[House Report 108-402]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    108-402

======================================================================



 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
              2673, CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004

                                _______
                                

  December 8, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 473]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 473, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2673, the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2004, and against its consideration. The 
rule further provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 220

    Date: December 8, 2003.
    Measure: Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 2673, 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004.
    Motion by: Mr. Frost.
    Summary of motion: To amend the rule to make in order a 
concurrent resolution that would direct the enrolling clerk to 
reinsert Senate language blocking the Labor Department from 
issuing rules taking away a worker's right to overtime pay.
    Results: Defeated 3 to 8.
    Vote by Members: Goss--Nay; Linder--Nay; Diaz-Balart--Nay; 
Hastings (WA)--Nay; Myrick--Nay; Sessions--Nay; Reynolds--Nay; 
Frost--Yea; Slaughter--Yea; McGovern--Yea; Dreier--Nay.

                                
