[Senate Report 106-74]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 150
106th Congress Report
SENATE
1st Session 106-74
======================================================================
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2000
_______
June 10, 1999.--Ordered to be printed
_______________________________________________________________________
Mr. Burns, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
[To accompany S. 1205]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1205)
making appropriations for military construction, family
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for
other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.
Total of bill as reported to Senate..................... $8,273,820,000
Amount of 2000 budget estimate.......................... 5,438,443,000
Amount of 1999 appropriations........................... 8,449,742,000
The bill as reported to the Senate:
Over the budget estimate, 2000...................... 2,835,377,000
Under appropriations for fiscal year 1999........... 175,922,000
C O N T E N T S
----------
Background:
Page
Purpose of the bill.......................................... 3
Comparative statement........................................ 3
Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act........ 8
Committee recommendation......................................... 8
Items of special interest........................................ 9
Military construction, Army...................................... 15
Military construction, Navy...................................... 16
Military construction, Air Force................................. 17
Military construction, Defense-wide.............................. 18
Military construction, Reserve components........................ 21
NATO Security Investment Program................................. 25
Family housing overview.......................................... 26
Family housing, Army............................................. 26
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps............................ 27
Family housing, Air Force........................................ 29
Family housing, Defense-wide..................................... 31
Family housing revitalization transfer fund...................... 31
Family housing improvement fund.................................. 31
Base realignment and closure account, part IV.................... 32
General provisions............................................... 33
Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 34
Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 35
Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 35
Project listing by location...................................... 36
BACKGROUND
Purpose of the Bill
The Military Construction appropriation bill provides
necessary funding for the planning, design, construction,
alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide,
both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the
construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and
maintenance of military family housing, including payments
against past housing mortgage indebtedness. Certain types of
community impact assistance may be provided, as well as
assistance to members of the military who face loss on the sale
of private residences due to installation realignments and
closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the
NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill
provides funding to implement base closures and realignments
authorized by law.
Comparative Statement
The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$8,273,820,000 for fiscal year 2000 military construction,
family housing, and base closure. The following table displays
the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current
fiscal year, and the President's fiscal year 2000 request.
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (+) or decrease (-) compared
Committee with--
Item 1999 adjusted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------------
1999 adjusted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military construction, Army......................... 865,726 656,003 1,067,422 +201,696 +411,419
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 118,000 .................. .................. -118,000 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 659,536 .................. .................. -659,536
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 983,726 1,315,539 1,067,422 +83,696 -248,117
Military construction, Navy......................... 602,593 319,786 884,883 +282,290 +565,097
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 5,860 .................. .................. -5,860 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 502,812 .................. .................. -502,812
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 608,453 822,598 884,883 +276,430 +62,285
Military construction, Air Force.................... 612,809 179,479 783,710 +170,901 +604,231
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 29,200 .................. .................. -29,200 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 379,867 .................. .................. -379,867
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 642,009 559,346 783,710 +141,701 +224,364
Military construction, Defense-wide................. 551,114 193,005 770,690 +219,576 +577,685
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 337,900 .................. .................. -337,900
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 551,114 530,905 770,690 +219,576 +239,785
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components...................... 2,785,302 3,228,388 3,506,705 +721,403 +278,317
Department of Defense Military Unaccompanied Housing -5,000 .................. .................. +5,000 ..................
Improvement Fund: Rescission (fiscal year 1997,
Public Law 104-196)................................
Military construction, Army National Guard.......... 148,803 16,045 226,734 +77,931 +210,689
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 2,500 .................. .................. -2,500 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 41,357 .................. .................. -41,357
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 151,303 57,402 226,734 +75,431 +169,332
Military construction, Air National Guard........... 169,801 21,319 238,545 +68,744 +217,226
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 15,900 .................. .................. -15,900 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 51,981 .................. .................. -51,981
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 185,701 73,300 238,545 +52,844 +165,245
Military construction, Army Reserve................. 102,119 23,120 105,817 +3,698 +82,697
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 54,506 .................. .................. -54,506
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 102,119 77,626 105,817 +3,698 +28,191
Military construction, Naval Reserve................ 31,621 4,933 31,475 -146 +26,542
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 10,020 .................. .................. -10,020
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 31,621 14,953 31,475 -146 +16,522
Military construction, Air Force Reserve............ 34,371 12,155 35,864 +1,493 +23,709
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 15,165 .................. .................. -15,165
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 34,371 27,320 35,864 +1,493 +8,544
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components..................... 505,115 250,601 638,435 +133,320 +387,834
Military construction transfer fund (emergency 475,000 .................. .................. -475,000 ..................
appropriations) (Public Law 106-31)................
===================================================================================================
Total, Military construction.................. 3,760,417 3,478,989 4,145,140 +384,723 +666,151
Appropriations............................ (3,118,957) (1,425,845) (4,145,140) (+1,026,183) (+2,719,295)
Rescissions............................... (-5,000) .................. .................. (+5,000) ..................
Emergency appropriations.................. (646,460) .................. .................. (-646,460) ..................
Advance appropriations.................... .................. (2,053,144) .................. .................. (-2,053,144)
===================================================================================================
NATO Security Investment Program.................... 155,000 191,000 100,000 -55,000 -91,000
Revised economic assumptions.................... -1,000 .................. .................. +1,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, NATO................................... 154,000 191,000 100,000 -54,000 -91,000
===================================================================================================
Family housing, Army:
New construction................................ 107,100 4,400 24,000 -83,100 +19,600
Construction improvements....................... 48,479 5,303 32,600 -15,879 +27,297
Planning and design............................. 6,350 4,300 4,300 -2,050 ..................
General reduction............................... -2,639 .................. .................. +2,639 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 43,991 .................. .................. -43,991
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 159,290 57,994 60,900 -98,390 +2,906
Operation and maintenance....................... 1,087,697 1,098,080 1,098,080 +10,383 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 5,200 .................. .................. -5,200 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Army................... 1,252,187 1,156,074 1,158,980 -93,207 +2,906
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
New construction................................ 58,504 15,182 115,589 +57,085 +100,407
Construction improvements....................... 227,791 31,708 165,050 -62,741 +133,342
Planning and design............................. 15,618 17,715 17,715 +2,097 ..................
General reduction and revised economic -7,323 .................. .................. +7,323 ..................
assumptions....................................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 171,167 .................. .................. -171,167
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 294,590 235,772 298,354 +3,764 +62,582
Operation and maintenance....................... 910,293 895,070 895,070 -15,223 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 10,599 .................. .................. -10,599 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Navy................... 1,215,482 1,130,842 1,193,424 -22,058 +62,582
Family housing, Air Force:
New construction................................ 175,099 50,418 187,611 +12,512 +137,193
Construction improvements....................... 104,108 34,280 129,952 +25,844 +95,672
Planning and design............................. 11,342 17,093 17,471 +6,129 +378
General reduction and revised economic -10,584 .................. .................. +10,584 ..................
assumptions....................................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 215,222 .................. .................. -215,222
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 279,965 317,013 335,034 +55,069 +18,021
Operation and maintenance....................... 780,204 821,892 821,892 +41,688 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-277)... 22,233 .................. .................. -22,233 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Air Force.............. 1,082,402 1,138,905 1,156,926 +74,524 +18,021
Family housing, Defense-wide:
Construction improvements....................... 345 50 50 -295 ..................
Operation and maintenance....................... 36,899 41,440 41,440 +4,541 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Defense-wide........... 37,244 41,490 41,490 +4,246 ..................
Family housing revitalization....................... .................. .................. 25,000 +25,000 +25,000
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement 2,000 78,756 25,000 +23,000 -53,756
Fund...............................................
===================================================================================================
Total, Family housing......................... 3,589,315 3,546,067 3,600,820 +11,505 +54,753
New construction................................ (340,703) (70,000) (327,200) (-13,503) (+257,200)
Construction improvements................. (380,723) (71,341) (327,652) (-53,071) (+256,311)
Planning and design....................... (33,310) (39,108) (39,486) (+6,176) (+378)
General reduction......................... (-20,546) .................. .................. (+20,546) ..................
Operation and maintenance................. (2,815,093) (2,856,482) (2,856,482) (+41,389) ..................
Family Housing Improvement Fund........... (2,000) (78,756) (25,000) (+23,000) (-53,756)
Emergency appropriations.................. (38,032) .................. .................. (-38,032) ..................
Advance appropriations.................... .................. (430,380) .................. .................. (-430,380)
===================================================================================================
Base realignment and closure accounts:
Part III........................................ 427,164 .................. .................. -427,164 ..................
Part IV......................................... 1,197,338 705,911 705,911 -491,427 ..................
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2001........ .................. 577,306 .................. .................. -577,306
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Base realignment and closure accounts.. 1,624,502 1,283,217 705,911 -918,591 -577,306
===================================================================================================
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps (fiscal year 6,000 .................. .................. -6,000 ..................
1999 Sec. 125).....................................
General Provisions
Contingency reduction (sec. 125).................... .................. .................. -278,051 -278,051 -278,051
===================================================================================================
Grand total: ..................
New budget (obligational) authority....... 9,134,234 8,499,273 8,273,820 -860,414 -225,453
Appropriations........................ (8,454,742) (5,438,443) (8,273,820) (-180,922) (+2,835,377)
Rescissions........................... (-5,000) .................. .................. (+5,000) ..................
Emergency appropriations.............. (684,492) .................. .................. (-684,492) ..................
Advance appropriations................ .................. (3,060,830) .................. .................. (-3,060,830)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance With Section 308 of the Budget Control Act
Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that the Committee include in
its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels
contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data
are reflected below:
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations
to its subcommittees of amounts for fiscal year 2000:
Subcommittee on Military Construction:
General purpose discretionary........................... 8,274 8,274 8,789 \1\ 8,789
Violent crime reduction fund............................ ........... ........... ........... ...........
Mandatory............................................... ........... ........... ........... ...........
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2000.................................................... ........... ........... ........... \2\ 2,473
2001.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 3,046
2002.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 1,608
2003.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 614
2004 and future year.................................... ........... ........... ........... 492
Financial assistance to State and local governments for 2000 NA ........... NA ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2000
appropriations of $8,273,820,000. This is $2,835,377,000 over
the budget request, and $175,922,000 under the appropriations
for fiscal year 1999. The basis for this recommendation is
contained in the following ``Items of special interest,'' and
under the discussions pertaining to each individual
appropriation. Complete project detail is provided in the
tables at the end of the report.
ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
COMPLIANCE WITH 302(b) ALLOCATION
The Appropriations Committee conformed fully to the budget
resolution for defense spending in its 302(b) allocation. This
allocation divided the budget authority and outlays among the
subcommittees with jurisdiction over discretionary spending. In
this recommended bill, the Appropriations Committee has
remained within the tight constraints of its 302(b) allocation
for military construction.
hearings
The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on
the fiscal year 2000 budget request during March 1999. The
subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the
military services and defense agencies concerning fiscal year
2000 budget priorities and base realignment and closure issues.
summary of committee recommendations
The budget request for fiscal year 2000 reflects a
reduction of $3,011,299,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal
year 1999. The Committee notes, with great concern, the
continuous under investment by the Department of Defense in
military facilities and infrastructure. This proposed level of
funding does not provide sufficient resources to continue the
Department's efforts to modernize, renovate, and improve aging
defense facilities.
The effects of sustained and structural inattention by the
Department and the military departments to basic infrastructure
are apparent on nearly every military installation. This will
continue to have long-term implications as facilities continue
to age disproportionately without a sustained level of
investment in maintenance and repair.
The requested funding level reflects a lack of commitment
by the administration to reduce the serious backlog of
readiness, revitalization and quality of life projects. The
Committee urges the Department to develop a comprehensive
funding strategy and plan to address these serious
infrastructure problems.
The Committee recommends an additional $2,835,377,000 above
the fiscal year 2000 budget request to fully fund the budget
request, as well as correct some of these deficiencies and
shortfalls. The total recommended appropriation for fiscal year
2000 is $8,273,820,000, a reduction of $175,922,000 from fiscal
year 1999 funding.
advance appropriations
The Committee is concerned that the President's fiscal year
2000 budget request for military construction recommended an
incremental funding approach for military construction and
family housing projects. The proposed use of ``advance
appropriations'' flies in the face of the Budget and
Impoundment Control Act of 1974 and the Administration's long
standing policy of fully funding military construction.
In reviewing the events that led to the decision to request
advance appropriations, the Committee is disturbed that such a
major financing policy change was instituted at such a late
date in the budget preparation process. It allowed almost no
discussion within the Administration about the considerable
risks that were being taken. The Committee also notes that no
precedent exists for the broad-based, incremental funding of
military construction as proposed by the Administration.
Although there has been tacit support within the Department
for the Administration's action, open discussions with the
civilian and military civil engineering community indicate
significant dangers to this approach for both cost and schedule
to complete the construction projects. To proceed in this
manner demonstrates poor financial stewardship and places the
fiscal year 2000 construction program in extreme jeopardy.
In addition to ``advance appropriations'', the
Administration requested the separation of funds for
supervision, overhead and inspection (SIOH) charges totaling
$154,281,000 from specific military construction projects and
to annualize those charges over a five-year period. The
Committee strongly opposes both changes to the management of
the Department's military construction and family housing
programs.
To ensure the integrity of the budget and appropriation
process and that such fiscal practices are not repeated, the
Committee directs the Department to fully fund all military
construction projects in future budget requests. Further, the
Committee directs the Department to adhere to the phase-funding
guidelines it had previously established in conjunction with
the Office of Management and Budget, prior to this budget
submission. Continued disregard of this direction will force
the Committee to review all military construction financing
policies and enact appropriate controls and restrictions.
environmental compliance projects
The Department has requested $244,910,000 for environmental
compliance project construction during fiscal year 2000. The
Committee recommends funding of $244,910,000 for these 25
projects, as follows:
[In thousands of dollars]
Alaska: State/Service/Installation/Project Recommended
Army: Fort Wainwright: Emissions Reduction Facility....... 15,500
Defense-Wide: DFSC Elmendorf AFB: Hydrant Fuel System..... 23,500
Defense-Wide: DESC Eielson AFB: Hydrant Fuel System....... 26,000
Colorado: Air Force: Schriever AFB: Sanitary Sewer Line....... 5,500
Florida: Air Force Reserve: Homestead ARB: Fire Fighter
Training Facility......................................... 2,000
Georgia: Air National Guard: Savannah IAP: Regional Fire
Training Facility......................................... 1,700
Hawaii:
Navy: Pearl Harbor NSY: Abrasive Blast & Paint Facility... 10,610
Air Force: Hickam AFB: Fire Training Facility............. 3,300
Kansas: Army: Fort Leavenworth: Water Treatment Plant......... 8,100
Maryland: Navy: Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Ctr: Sewage
Treatment Plant........................................... 10,070
North Carolina: Air Force: Pope AFB: Dangerous Cargo Pad...... 7,700
Pennsylvania: Naval Reserve: Willow Grove NAS: Hazardous/Matrl
Strg Facility............................................. 1,930
South Carolina:
Navy: Beaufort Marine Corps Air Station: Corrosion Control
Facil-
ity..................................................... 8,700
Air Force: Charleston AFB: C-17 Corrosion Control Facility 18,200
Tennessee: Air Force: Arnold Engineering Dev Center: Upgrade
Jet Eng Air Induct Sys Ph III............................. 7,800
Washington:
Army: Fort Lewis: Tank Trail Erosion Mitigation--Yakima Ph
V....................................................... 12,000
Defense-Wide: DESC Fairchild AFB: Add to Hydrant Fuel
System.................................................. 12,400
Guam:
Air Force: Andersen AFB: Landfill Closure................. 8,900
Defense-Wide: Def Fuel Support Point Guam: Replace Hydrant
Fuel System............................................. 24,300
Puerto Rico: Air National Guard: Puerto Rico IAP: C-130 Fuel
Cell Corrosion Control.................................... 5,600
Spain: Defense-Wide: DFSC Moron Air Base: Replace Hydrant Fuel
System.................................................... 15,200
United Kingdom:
Air Force: Feltwell: Wastewater Treatment Facility........ 3,000
Air Force: RAF Mildenhall: Hazmat Storage Facility........ 1,000
Air Force: RAF Mildenhall: Consolidate Corrision Control.. 10,200
Air Force: RAF Molesworth: Wastewater Treatement Facility. 1,700
--------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total................................................... 244,910
The Committee again directs the Department to devote the
maximum amount of resources to actual cleanups and to limit
resources expended on administration, support, studies, and
investigations, to the greatest extent possible.
REPROGRAMMING CRITERIA
The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements more than $2,000,000.
To provide the individual services the flexibility to proceed
with construction contracts without disruption or delay, the
costs associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in
prior years for which construction contracts have not been
completed.
base realignment and closure
The Committee has included $705,911,000 for the ``Base
realignment and closure'' account. The Committee has fully
funded the budget request for base closure and realignment.
This includes funding of the requirements for environmental
cleanup at closing and realigning bases.
The Committee again asks the General Accounting Office
[GAO] to continue its annual review of the base closure
accounts. The Committee requests GAO's review of and
recommendations on the validity of DOD's proposed budget
requests for base closure activities. The Committee expects the
Department of Defense and the military services to fully
cooperate with the GAO in all aspects of its review.
The Committee believes the annual GAO review will continue
to give the Congress a better foundation for approving future
requests. This report should be provided to the congressional
defense committees not later than May 15, 2000.
barracks construction
The Committee recommends $753,898,000 for 47 barracks
construction projects in fiscal year 2000, an increase of
$586,695,000 over the budget request. The projects are as
follows:
BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/location/project Request Change Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARMY
Alaska: Fort Richardson: Whole 2,200 12,400 14,600
Barracks Complex................
Georgia:
Fort Stewart: Whole Barracks 7,000 ........... 7,000
Complex.....................
Fort Benning: Whole Barracks 7,100 39,900 47,000
Complex.....................
Hawaii: Schofield Barracks: Whole 14,200 ........... 14,200
Barracks Complex................
Kansas:
Fort Riley: Whole Barracks ........... 27,000 27,000
Renovation..................
Fort Leavenworth: Whole 3,900 22,100 26,000
Barracks Complex............
Kentucky: Fort Campbell: Whole 4,800 27,200 32,000
Barracks Complex................
Maryland: Fort Meade: Whole 2,700 15,300 18,000
Barracks Complex................
New Jersey: Fort Monmouth: ........... 11,800 11,800
Barracks Improvement............
North Carolina:
Fort Bragg: Whole Barracks 16,508 ........... 16,508
Complex.....................
Fort Bragg: Upgrade Barracks. ........... 14,400 14,400
Pennsylvania: Carlisle Barracks: 750 4,250 5,000
Whole Barracks Complex..........
Texas: Fort Hood: Whole Barracks 4,350 24,650 29,000
Complex.........................
Virginia: Fort Eustis: Whole 5,800 33,200 39,000
Barracks Complex................
Germany:
Ansbach: Whole Barracks 3,150 17,850 21,000
Complex.....................
Bamberg: Whole Barracks 1,230 6,970 8,200
Complex.....................
Bamberg: Whole Barracks 860 4,840 5,700
Complex.....................
Mannheim: Whole Barracks 675 3,825 4,500
Complex.....................
Bamberg: Whole Barracks 1,400 7,900 9,300
Complex.....................
Korea: Camp Casey: Whole Barracks 4,650 26,350 31,000
Complex.........................
--------------------------------------
Army Total................. 81,273 299,935 381,208
======================================
NAVY/MARINE CORPS
California:
NMC San Diego: Bachelor 5,470 16,120 21,590
Enlisted Quarters...........
NavHospital 29 Palms: 1,930 5,710 7,640
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters..
MCAGCC 29 Palms: Bachelor 4,840 14,290 19,130
Enlisted Quarters...........
Camp Pendleton: Bachelor 2,390 7,350 9,740
Enlisted Quarters...........
Georgia: NAS Atlanta: Bachelor ........... 5,430 5,430
Enlisted Quarters...............
Hawaii: NS Pearl Harbor: Bachelor 4,720 13,880 18,600
Enlisted Quarters...............
Illinois:
NTC Great Lakes: Recruit In- 3,370 9,940 13,310
Process Barracks............
NTC Great Lakes: Bachelor 7,700 23,710 31,410
Enlisted Quarters...........
Maine: NAS Brunswick: Bachelor 4,270 12,620 16,890
Enlisted Quarters...............
Mississippi:
NCBC Gulfport: Bachelor 3,260 9,600 12,860
Enlisted Quarters...........
CTC Gulfport: Bachelor 1,600 4,710 6,310
Enlisted Quarters...........
Virginia:
FCTC Dam Neck: Bachelor 2,610 7,700 10,310
Enlisted Quarters...........
MCCDC Quantico: Bachelor 5,270 15,550 20,820
Enlisted Quarters...........
NSY Norfolk: Bachelor 4,460 13,170 17,630
Enlisted Quarters...........
Bahrain:
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters- 6,230 18,320 24,550
Transient...................
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters- 5,840 17,930 23,770
Security Force..............
--------------------------------------
Navy/MC Total.............. 63,960 196,030 259,990
======================================
AIR FORCE
Alabama: Maxwell AFB: Officer ........... 10,600 10,600
Transient Student Dormitory.....
Alaska: Elmendorf AFB: Dormitory. 3,727 12,073 15,800
Florida:
Eglin AFB: Dormitory......... 1,635 5,365 7,000
Eglin Aux. 9: Dormitory...... 2,161 6,939 9,100
Mississippi: Keesler AFB: Student 4,679 15,221 19,900
Dormitory.......................
Montana: Malmstrom AFB: Dormitory ........... 11,600 11,600
Nebraska: Offutt AFB: Dormitory.. 1,941 6,359 8,300
Oklahoma: Tinker AFB: Dormitory.. 1,602 5,198 6,800
Texas: Lackland AFB: Dormitory... 1,257 4,043 5,300
Virginia: Langley AFB: Dormitory. 1,486 4,814 6,300
Korea: Osan AB: Dormitory........ 3,482 8,518 12,000
--------------------------------------
Total Air Force............ 21,970 90,730 112,700
======================================
GRAND TOTAL................ 167,203 586,695 753,898
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingency funding.--The Committee believes that the
amount requested for construction contingencies, 5 percent for
new construction and 10 percent for alterations or additions,
is excessive. The Committee supports the requirement
established for unforeseen needs, such as environmental and
regulatory requirements, unanticipated subsurface conditions
and changes in the bid climate. However, the Committee has
learned that this contingency funding is being used to fund
upgrades on projects which have already been awarded and
satisfy the basic requirement. The Committee has included a
provision (Section 125) which reduces the funding available for
contingency within the Department.
Alkali silica reactivity.--The Corps of Engineers has
selected Fort Campbell, Kentucky as the initial defense
installation to mitigate/prevent the deleterious effects of
alkali silica reactivity (ASR) associated with concrete aprons,
taxiways, tarmacs. However, the Committee recommends that the
Corps, in conjunction with the Department of Defense, undertake
a broader investigation of ASR problems at all domestic defense
installations. Further, the Committee understands the Corps has
already developed a list of high priority sites where ASR
problems exist. The investigation should continue this
prioritization of sites and include the development of
specifications to prevent and mitigate ASR in new and existing
concrete structures as well as associated cost estimates per
installation. The Committee directs the Department to report to
congressional defense committees on its strategy to deal with
ASR no later than March 15, 2000.
Real Property Maintenance Reporting Requirement.--The
Committee recommends a continuation of the following general
rules for repairing a facility under Operations and Maintenance
account funding:
Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement,
and such replacement can be up to current standards or code.
Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as
repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional
conversions must be performed as military construction
projects.
Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects,
as long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete
and usable facility.
The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day
notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an
estimated cost in excess of $10,000,000.
Military Construction, Army
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $983,726,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 656,003,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,067,422,000
The Committee recommends $1,067,422,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 2000. This is an increase of $411,419,000 from the
budget request for fiscal year 2000. (See State tables at the
end of the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2000 as
practical:
Range improvements, Fort Knox, KY.--Of the $15,000,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
Construction'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,200,000 be made available to make range improvements at
the Pells Range, Fort Knox, KY.
Ready building, Fort Richardson, AK.--Of the $15,000,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the
``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $1,500,000 be made available to construct a
ready building at Fort Richardson, AK.
Fire-rescue station, Ft. Rucker, AL.--Of the $15,000,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the
``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $1,000,000 be made available to replace an
existing fire station located at Cairns Army Air Field, Ft.
Rucker, AL.
Armament Software Engineering Center, Picatinny Arsenal,
NJ.--Of the $65,114,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that up to $1,900,000 be made available for the design
of this facility to be located at Picatinny Arsenal, NJ.
Joint mobility complex, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of the
$65,114,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design
of a joint mobility complex to be located at either Fort
Wainwright or Eielson AFB, AK.
Military History Institute and Army Heritage Museum,
Carlisle, PA.--The Committee is aware of discussions between
the Secretary of the Army, officials representing the City of
Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
regarding the establishment of a Military History Institute and
Army Heritage Museum in Carlisle. The Committee understands
that the Secretary of the Army committed to making the proposed
institute a first class facility. The community and the
Commonwealth offered to provide 54 acres of land and $5,000,000
to establish the facility. The Committee applauds the
commitment made by the Army and the people of Pennsylvania, and
urges the Secretary of the Army to continue to work closely
with the Carlisle project coordinators to advance the
completion of the Military History Institute and Army Heritage
Museum.
Of the $65,114,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that up to $500,000 be made available for the design of
this facility.
Information assurance.--The Department of Defense currently
operates over two million separate computers and 25,000
distinct computer systems to conduct its mission. These
computer systems are integral parts of a wide variety of
defense programs. Many of these programs are critical to the
direct fulfillment of military and supporting intelligence
missions.
Attacks on these systems are capable of significantly
disrupting military operations and activities at all levels.
The Department of Defense is interested in developing an
effective control over the access to its information systems
through computers because its battle and communications systems
are becoming increasingly dependent on information networks.
The Committee understands that the Army is currently assessing
technologies to make man-machine interface more user friendly,
and is focusing on exploration and development of technologies
in the biometrics arena to meet its information assurance
requirements.
The Committee directs the Army to conduct a feasibility
study of its requirements for a facility to house the combined
activities of biometrics sensor and template repository,
biometrics security technology, and other Army information
assurance development and testing activities to accomplish a
more focused and effective information assurance effort. This
report should be provided to the congressional defense
committee not later than February 15, 2000.
Military Construction, Navy
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $608,453,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 319,786,000
Committee recommendation................................ 884,883,000
The Committee recommends $884,883,000 for Navy and Marine
Corps military construction for fiscal year 2000. This amount
is an increase of $565,097,000 from the fiscal year 2000 budget
request. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2000 as
practical:
Learning resource center, NAVSTA Pascagoula, MS.--Of the
$8,862,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $920,000 be made available to
construct a learning resource center at the NAVSTA, Pascagoula,
MS.
Apron modifications, NAS Whiting Field, FL.--Of the
$8,862,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $600,000 be made available to
construct a power check pad/apron modifications at the NAS
Whiting Field, FL.
Prepositioned equipment maintenance facilities, Blount
Island, Jacksonville, FL.--The Committee understands that the
Secretary of Defense recently approved a waiver of the current
moratorium on land acquisition for the purchase of the afloat
prepositioning maintenance facilities at Blount Island,
Jacksonville, FL. These facilities are critical to the
prepositioning support of the Marine Corps. The Committee
encourages the Secretary of the Navy to proceed with the
necessary actions required to initiate this land acquisition at
the earliest possible date.
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor, WA.--The Committee is
concerned over the unwillingness of the Navy and the Department
of Defense to address the need for an elementary special
education center to serve the Naval Submarine Base, Bangor,
Washington. In the Senate report accompanying the fiscal year
1999 Military Construction Appropriations Bill, the Department
was directed to make $1,000,000 available from the ``DOD
dependent school'' account for the design of such a facility to
serve the Bangor installation, and to award a contract for the
planning and design as early as practical in fiscal year 1999.
Despite this language, the Department has not proceeded with
this contract. The funds remain available, and the Committee
directs the Navy and the Department of Defense to proceed
immediately with design, planning, and site preparation
activities associated with this facility. The Committee further
urges the Department to address the requirement for this
construction project in the fiscal year 2001 budget.
Military Construction, Air Force
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $642,009,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 179,479,000
Committee recommendation................................ 783,710,000
The Committee recommends $783,710,000 for the Air Force in
fiscal year 2000. This is an increase of $604,213,000 to the
fiscal year 2000 budget request. (See State tables at the end
of the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2000 as
practical:
Child development center addition, Hill AFB, UT.--Of the
$14,126,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available to
expand the child care center at Hill AFB, Utah.
Youth center upgrade, Holloman AFB, NM.--Of the $14,126,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the
``Military Construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,100,000 be made available to
expand and upgrade the youth center at Holloman AFB, NM.
Wing headquarters, Goodfellow AFB, TX.--Of the $32,764,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
Construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design of a
wing headquarters at Goodfellow AFB, TX.
Fire/crash rescue station, Offutt AFB, NE.--Of the
$32,764,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military Construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $760,000 be made available for the
design of a fire/crash rescue station at Offutt AFB, NE.
Vehicle maintenance corrosion control facility, Minot AFB,
ND.--Of the $32,764,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Military Construction, Air Force'', the Committee directs
that not less than $280,000 be made available for the design of
a vehicle maintenance corrosion control facility at Minot AFB,
ND.
McClellan Nuclear Radiation Center, CA.--During fiscal year
2000, the Committee fully expects the Department of the Air
Force to reprogram $17,593,000, from within the Base
Realignment and Closure Account contained in this bill, to
accomplish the transfer of the McClellan Nuclear Radiation
Center, CA., to the University of California.
Weapons' storage area, Malmstrom AFB, MT.--The Committee
understands that the weapons' storage area on the base is more
than thirty years old, does not meet today's high standards for
weapons' storage, and requires an intensive manpower effort in
loading and unloading munitions. The costs to maintain this
facility are in the range of $7,000,000 to $8,000,000 each
year. The Committee strongly believes this facility must be
replaced expeditiously and resited to a location that takes
into consideration current safety standards.
Accordingly, of the $32,764,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Military Construction, Air Force'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $2,000,000 be made
available for the design of a new weapons' storage area at
Malmstrom AFB during fiscal year 2000. The Committee further
directs the Secretary of the Air Force to report to the
Committee on the status of these design efforts quarterly
throughout the year, beginning with December 15, 1999.
Military Construction, Defense-wide
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $551,114,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 193,005,000
Committee recommendation................................ 770,690,000
The Committee recommends $770,690,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-wide'' account. The amount
recommended is an increase of $577,685,000 from the fiscal year
2000 budget request. (See State tables at the end of the report
for complete program recommendations.)
chemical demilitarization
The budget request identified a requirement of $256,200,000
for the construction of chemical weapon demilitarization
facilities in fiscal year 1999. The Committee recommends a
total of $261,300,000 for this program.
The following chemical demilitarization projects are
provided for fiscal year 2000:
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/location/project Request Change Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Anniston AD: Ammunition 7,000 ......... 7,000
Demilitarization Facility. Ph VII...
Arkansas: Pine Bluff Arsenal: 61,800 ......... 61,800
Ammunition Demilitarization
Facility. Ph IV.....................
Indiana: Newport AD: Ammunition 61,200 ......... 61,200
Demilitarization Facility, Ph II....
Kentucky: Blue Grass AD: Ammuniton 11,800 ......... 11,800
Demilitarization Facility, Ph I.....
Kentucky: Blue Grass AD: Ammunition 11,000 ......... 11,000
Demilitarization Support............
Kentucky: Blue Grass AD: Ammunition 900 5,100 6,000
Surveillance Facility...............
Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Ground: 66,600 ......... 66,600
Ammunition Demilitarization
Facility, Ph I......................
Oregon: Umatilla DA: Ammuniton 35,900 ......... 35,900
Demilitarization Facility, Ph V.....
----------------------------------
Total.......................... 256,200 5,100 261,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee does not support the Department's transfer of
the Chemical Demilitarization Program funds from the Office of
the Secretary of Defense to the Army Military Construction
Program. The Committee believes that the focus on this program
must remain at the Office of the Secretary of the Defense
rather than at the service level and directs the Department to
submit the fiscal year 2001 budget accordingly.
Medical construction program
The budget request included $161,750,000 for 23 projects
and for unspecified minor construction to provide hospital and
medical facilities, including treatment, training, and medical
research and development facilities. The Committee recommends
funding for these projects and two additional projects for a
total of $174,950,000.
The fiscal year 2000 program of $174,950,000 represents a
decrease of $35,650,000 from the amount appropriated for
medical construction projects in fiscal year 1999.
The following hospital and medical projects are provided
for fiscal year 2000:
[In thousands of dollars]
Location/Project Recommended
Training Facilities:
Florida: Pensacola Naval Air Station: Aircrew Water
Survival Training Facility.............................. 4,300
Maryland: Patuxent River NAS: Aircrew Water Survival
Training Facility....................................... 4,150
North Carolina: Cherry Point: Aircrew Water Survival
Training Facility....................................... 3,500
Texas: Fort Sam Houston: Veterinary Instructional Facility 5,800
Virginia: Norfolk NAS: Aircrew Water Survival Training
Facility................................................ 4,050
Washington: Whidbey Island NAS: Aircrew Water Survival
Training Facility....................................... 4,700
Hospital and Medical Facilities:
Alabama: Dannelly Field: Medical Training and Dining
Facility................................................ 6,000
Alaska: Ft. Wainwright: Hospital Replacement (Phase I).... 18,000
Arizona: Davis Monthan AFB: Ambulatory Health Care Center
Addition................................................ 10,000
California: Los Angeles AFB: Medical/Dental Clinic
Replacement............................................. 13,600
California: Travis AFB: War Readiness Materials Warehouse
& Engineering Support Facility.......................... 7,500
Florida: Jacksonville NAS: Branch Medical/Dental Clinic
Addition................................................ 3,780
Florida: Patrick AFB: Medical Logistics Facility
Replacement............................................. 1,750
Georgia: Moody AFB: War Readiness Materials Warehouse/
Bioenvironmental Engineering Facility................... 1,250
Indiana: Ft. Wayne: Medical Training and Dining Facility.. 7,200
Kansas: Fort Riley: Consolidated Troop Medical Clinic..... 6,000
Maryland: Andrews AFB: Medical Logistics Facility Addition 3,000
Ohio: Wright-Patterson AFB: Occupational Health Clinic,
Bioenvironmental Engineering Lab Replacement............ 3,900
Virginia: Cheatham Annex: Fleet Hospital Support Office
Container Holding Yard.................................. 1,650
Washington: Ft. Lewis: North Ft. Lewis Dental Clinic
Replacement............................................. 5,500
Germany: Ramstein Air Base: Dental Clinic Addition........ 7,100
Korea: Yongsan: Hospital Addition......................... 38,570
Korea: Yongsan: Medical Supply/Equipment Storage Warehouse
Replacement............................................. 2,550
Puerto Rico: Naval Security Group Activity: Medical/Dental
Clinic Replacement...................................... 4,000
United Kingdom: Royal Air Force Lakenheath: Dental Clinic
Addition................................................ 7,100
--------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total................................................. 174,950
Contingency construction.--The Committee has provided
$938,000 for the Secretary of Defense ``Contingency
construction'' account in accordance with the budget request.
This account provides funds which may be used by the Secretary
of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The Committee
believes that the funding provided to the account is adequate
to meet the needs of the Department.
Forward operating locations.--The fiscal year 2000 budget
submission requested $42,800,000 for the acquisition and
construction of three forward deployment sites for drug
interdiction and counter-drug activities. The proposal was to
construct three bases in Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Curacao,
Netherlands Antilles using funds from the ``Drug Interdiction
and Counter-drug Activities, Defense'' appropriation.
The Committee recognizes the importance of the Department's
counter-narcotics mission, and supports the high priority that
it places on this mission. However, the Committee is concerned
that the proposal to construct these new bases was developed
outside the military construction process and budgetary
guidelines without adequate consensus among the services and
Congress as to the overall requirements for the counter-
narcotics mission in the region. The Committee believes it is
premature to appropriate funds for these bases until the
Congress has been provided a long-range master plan for each
location, combined with justification, detailed data, and costs
for each of the projects that the Department anticipates
building at these sites. The Department must also determine
which military service has the responsibility for building and
maintaining these bases.
The Committee also directs the Department to submit future
requests for specific military construction projects in support
of drug interdiction and counter-drug activities of the
Department of Defense on a line-item basis, as part of the
budget request for military construction. Accordingly, the
Committee did not recommend construction funding for these
forward operating locations, but rather provided $5,000,000 of
planning and design funds that will facilitate the detailed
planning and design work for these facilities over the next
fiscal year. The Committee directs that none of the fund
appropriated in the 1999 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations
Act (Public law 106-31) be used to fund these bases. However,
the Committee urges the Department to develop its long-range
master plan as quickly as possible. In the interim, the
Committee urges the Department to continue aggressive counter-
drug operations using existing facilities in the region.
SCHOOL FACILITIES STUDY
The Committee is concerned about the adequacy of special
education services available to the dependent children of
uniformed personnel, particularly on those installations
identified as compassionate assignment posts. The Committee is
also concerned about the impact of special education needs on
civilian school districts, such as the Central Kitsap School
District, Washington, that support military installations
identified as compassionate assignment posts. Consolidation and
base realignment have greatly increased the number of personnel
assigned to certain installations, such as the Bangor Submarine
Base, Washington, overburdening the capacity of local school
districts and jeopardizing the quality of educational services,
particularly special education services, to both the affected
civilian and military populations.
Accordingly, the Committee has included a provision
(section 126) which directs the Secretary to provide the
Committee with a report, by April 30, 2000, detailing the
following: (1) a survey of schools on military installations in
the United States that are operated by either the Department of
Defense or local school districts; (2) a survey of school
districts in the continental United States that have
experienced an increase in enrollment of 20 percent or more in
the past five years resulting from base realignments or
consolidations; and (3) an assessment of the impact of
increased special education requirements on school districts in
areas designated by the military departments as compassionate
assignments posts. The Committee further directs the Secretary
to assess the adequacy of special education services and
facilities for dependent children of uniformed personnel within
the United States, particularly at compassionate assignment
posts, and to recommend corrective measures where necessary to
adequately support military personnel, including such
improvements as the renovation of existing schools or the
construction of new schools, a cost estimate of needed
improvements, and a recommended source of funding within the
Department of Defense.
Given the importance of providing quality education to
dependent children of military personnel and maintaining the
educational standards of the school districts that support
military installations, the Committee expresses great
disappointment that this study was not initiated in compliance
with the reporting requirements that accompanied the fiscal
year 1999 Military Construction Appropriations Bill, and
directs the Secretary to initiate the study outlined above
without further delay.
Military Construction, Reserve Components
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $505,115,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 77,572,000
Committee recommendation................................ 638,435,000
The Committee recommends $638,435,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components.
This amount is $560,863,000 above the fiscal year 2000 budget
request. This increase reflects the Committee's continued
strong support for the Guard and Reserve.
The Committee's recommended action on each Reserve
component project is reflected in the State list at the end of
this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve component as outlined in the following table:
RESERVE COMPONENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Component Request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard..................... $16,045,000 $226,734,000
Air National Guard...................... 21,319,000 238,545,000
Army Reserve............................ 23,120,000 105,817,000
Naval Reserve........................... 4,933,000 31,475,000
Air Force Reserve....................... 12,155,000 35,864,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 77,572,000 638,435,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapid Assessment and Initial Detection (RAID) Teams.--The
Committee notes the continued implementation of the Defense
Reform Initiative Directive Number 25, which address the
integration of National Guard and reserve components in
responding to weapons of mass destruction. The Committee
supports the continued establishment of National Guard RAID
teams as a critical component of this program.
However, as the National Guard assumes this new mission,
many of these teams do not have adequate facilities from which
to train, to coordinate with other federal and state agencies,
and to store decontamination and reconnaissance equipment. Any
outstanding requirements in this area must be fully integrated
into the overall resourcing strategy for responding to weapons
of mass destruction.
Accordingly, the Committee directs the Secretary of the
Army, in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard
Bureau, to review the overall RAID teams' infrastructure
requirements. This study should provide a master plan on RAID
teams facility requirements, identify existing shortfalls,
provide prioritization of any needed facilities, and identify
proposed sources of funding and the associated budgetary time
line. This assessment should be provided to the congressional
defense committees not later than February 15, 2000.
The Committee has added $35,446,000 for specific Reserve
component planning and design initiatives and minor
construction projects listed below. The Department is expected
to program the construction funds for these projects.
Planning and design.--The Committee recommendation provides
an additional $15,081,000 over the budget request for planning
and design activities for the Reserve components.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 1999 as
practical:
Armed Forces Reserve Center/organizational maintenance
shop, Glen Jean, WV.--Of the $29,667,000 provided for planning
and design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,200,000 be made
available for the design of an armed forces reserve center and
organizational maintenance shop at Glen Jean, WV.
Army aviation support facility, Bangor, ME.--Of the
$29,667,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,340,000 be made available for the design of an Army
aviation support facility located at Bangor, ME.
Regional training institute dormitory, Gowen Field, ID.--Of
the $20,771,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,220,000 be made available to
construct a regional training institute dormitory at Gowen
Field, ID.
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Smyrna, TN.--Of the
$29,667,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,500,000 be made available for the design of an armed
forces reserve center at Smyrna, TN.
Readiness center, Williamstown, WV.--Of the $29,667,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$500,000 be made available for the design of a readiness center
in Wood County, WV.
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Sand Springs, OK.--The
Committee directs the Army National Guard to include the Armed
Forces Reserve Center, Sand Springs, Oklahoma in its fiscal
year 2001 budget request. The Committee further requests that
the National Guard Bureau periodically update the Committee on
the status of this project.
Regional training center, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$20,771,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,500,000 be made available to construct a
regional training institute at Fort Harrison, MT.
Organizational maintenance shop, Fair Haven, VT.--Of the
$20,771,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,400,000 be made available to construct an
organizational maintenance shop at Fair Haven, VT.
Readiness center, Bryan, TX.--Of the $20,771,000 provided
for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,500,000 be made available to construct a readiness center in
Bryan, TX.
Combat arms educational facility, Fort Bragg, NC.--The
Committee notes the urgent requirement for the construction of
an Army National Guard combat arms educational facility located
at Fort Bragg, NC. This facility was identified by the Army
Chief of Staff to serve as part of the Total Army School System
and will provide standard individual training and education to
active component, Army National Guard and Army Reserve
soldiers. The Committee directs the Army National Guard to
include funding for this project in its fiscal year 2001 budget
submission.
MOUT assault course, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the $20,771,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,500,000 be made available to construct a MOUT assault
course at Fort Harrison, MT.
Shoreline protection, Camp Grafton, ND.--Of the $20,771,000
provide for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,500,000 be made available for shoreline protection at
Camp Grafton, ND.
Utility expansion, Camp Dawson, WV.--Of the $20,771,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $650,000 be made available to expand utilities at Camp
Dawson, WV.
Readiness center, Westfield, MA.--Of the $20,771,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,233,000 be made available to construct a temporary
readiness support facility in Westfield, MA.
Readiness center, Yakima, WA.--Of the $29,667,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Army National Guard''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $600,000 be
made available for the design of an armory in Yakima, WA.
Further, the Committee directs that the National Guard Bureau
include this project in the fiscal year 2001 budget request.
Scout armories, AK.--Of the $20,771,000 provided for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,500,000 be made available for the construction of Scout
armories in Nightmute, Tuntutliak, and Petersburg, AK.
Training site maintenance facility, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of
the $20,771,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available to
construct a training site maintenance facility at Fort
Harrison, MT.
Armory, Sedalia, MO.--Of the $29,667,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Army National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $300,000 be made
available for the design of an armory to be located in Sedalia,
MO.
Mobilization and Training Equipment Site/Combined Support
Maintenance Shop, Fort Drum, NY.--Of the $29,667,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Army National Guard''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,600,000 be
made available for the design of these facilities at Fort Drum
NY.
Repair taxiway/apron, Reno-Stead Airport, NV.--Of the
$20,771,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,490,000 be made available to reconstruct the
apron and taxiway located at the Reno-Stead Airport, NV.
Readiness center, Bozeman, MT.--Of the $29,667,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Army National Guard''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $500,000 be
made available for the design of a readiness center at Bozeman,
MT.
Public safety training center, Spokane, WA.--Of the
$29,667,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $2,215,000 be made available for the design of a public
safety training center to be located in Spokane, WA.
Water storage tank, NAS Memphis, TN.--Of the $4,036,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the
``Military Construction, Naval Reserve'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,050,000 be made available to
construct an elevated water storage tank at the NAS, Memphis,
TN.
Army Reserve Center, Lincoln, NE.--Of the $2,716,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
Reserve'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,300,000 be made available for the construction of a Reserve
Center in Lincoln, NE.
Aircraft apron additions, General Mitchell IAP, WI.--Of the
$5,467,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Air Force Reserve'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $972,000 be made available to construct an
aircraft apron addition at the General Mitchell IAP Air Reserve
Station, WI, in support of the 440th Airlift Wing. Further, of
the $7,000,000 provided for unspecified minor construction with
the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,410,000 be made available to construct an
aircraft apron addition in support of the 128th Air Refueling
Wing located at the General Mitchell IAP, WI.
Arm/dearm area, Great Falls, MT.--Of the $17,871,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Air National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$150,000 be made available for the design of an arm/dearm area
for Gore Hill, Great Falls, MT.
Aircraft corrosion control facility, Kulis ANGB, AK.--Of
the $17,871,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $955,000 be made available for the design of a
corrosion control facility at Kulis ANGB, AK.
Consolidated aircraft maintenance hangar, McGuire AFB,
NJ.--Of the $17,871,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,500,000 be made available for the design of a
consolidated aircraft maintenance hangar for the Air National
Guard at McGuire AFB, NJ.
Weapons release shop, Hector Field, ND.--Of the $17,781,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Air National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$300,000 be made available for the design on a weapons release
shop at Hector Field, Fargo, ND.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $154,000,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 191,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 100,000,000
The Committee has provided $100,000,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program
for fiscal year 2000. This amount is $91,000,000 below the
President's fiscal year 2000 budget request. However, the
Committee expects the Department to use funds that were
appropriated in the 1999 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations
Act (Public Law 106-31) to provide adequate funding for this
account in accordance with the amount authorized for fiscal
year 2000.
NATO Security Investment Program funds.--The Committee
continues to be concerned that the Department would like to use
NATO Security Investment Program [NSIP] funds to help pay for
initiatives under the Partnership for Peace Program [PFP] for
countries outside of NATO.
The NSIP was established to fund critical infrastructure
requirements within the NATO alliance. Every year, there are
many more requirements than available funds. There continues to
be significant funding challenges in the areas of logistics,
communications, and construction that must be addressed by
these limited funds. Accordingly, the Committee has again
included a provision which prohibits the use of NSIP funds for
any aspect of the Partnership for Peace Program or support to
non-NATO countries.
Family Housing Overview
The Committee has provided $3,600,820,000 for family
housing construction, operations and maintenance, the
Department's family housing improvements fund, and the new
Family Housing Revitalization Transfer Fund. This amount is
$484,735,000 above the fiscal year 2000 budget request and
$11,505,000 above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 1999.
Family Housing, Army
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $1,252,187,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 1,112,083,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,158,980,000
The Committee recommends a total of $1,158,980,000 for
family housing, Army, in fiscal year 2000. This is $46,897,000
over the fiscal year 2000 budget request.
Family housing, Dugway Proving Ground, UT.--The Committee
notes the importance of the chemical and biological test and
evaluation mission at Dugway Proving Ground. This mission makes
a significant impact on the chem-bio readiness for the soldier
on the ground. The Army's inconsistent support of family
housing at Dugway, negatively impacts the mission due to the
difficulty in recruiting and maintaining a workforce at such an
isolated location. The Committee directs the Army to provide
adequate family housing support at Dugway Proving Ground.
Further, the Committee directs the Army to report to the
Congressional Defense Committee within 180 days of enactment of
this act, on the implementation of this directive. This report
should also include the strategy the Army will take to provide
adequate family housing resources in the out years.
construction
The Committee recommends $24,000,000 for new construction
as shown below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Korea: Camp Humphreys (60 units)........ $4,400,000 $24,000,000
-------------------------------
Total............................... 4,400,000 24,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction Improvements
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of
Location/project units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany:
Weisbaden.................................. 198 $8,100,000
Baumholder................................. 162 17,500,000
Hanau...................................... 64 7,000,000
------------------------
Total.................................... ....... 32,600,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $1,215,482,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 959,675,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,193,424,000
The Committee recommends $1,193,424,000 for family housing,
Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2000. This amount is
$233,749,000 over the fiscal year 2000 budget request.
Naval Flag Officer Quarters
The Committee understands that the Navy has spent a total
of $5,500,000 from the ``Operation and Maintenance, Navy''
appropriation to maintain, repair and preserve three flag
officer quarters from fiscal years 1992 through 1999. In
addition, ``Family Housing, Navy'' appropriation funding was
used to supplement these major renovation initiatives.
The use of the ``Operation and Maintenance, Navy''
appropriation for family housing renovation is totally
inappropriate, irrespective of the rank of the individual who
occupies these quarters. ``Family Housing, Navy'' funding is
the correct appropriation for all family housing expenses, to
include maintenance and repair. The Navy's designation of
senior flag officers' quarters as representational, appears to
be an attempt to circumvent the Congressional controls
regarding limits on expenditures on flag and general officers'
quarters. Further, the Navy has systematically failed to notify
the Congress that these renovations and other family housing
improvements were planned and ongoing, as well as that some of
these projects exceeded cost variation guidelines. Accordingly,
the Committee has included a new provision (section 124) which
requires congressional notification of any expenditure of
$25,000 or more for repair and maintenance of flag and general
officers' quarters.
The Committee directs that the General Accounting Office
review the Department of Defense spending on general and flag
officers' quarters and report to the congressional defense
committees on their findings not later than March 15, 2000.
In its fiscal year 2000 budget submission, the Navy has
requested funding for 41 units of senior officer housing. The
Committee disapproves funding for the following projects and
instead directs that these funds be applied to the
revitalization of junior enlisted Navy housing at these bases:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of
Location/project units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California: CNB-San Diego-Point Loma........... 8 -$3,185,000
Hawaii: CNB Pearl Harbor-Makalapa.............. 25 -4,582,000
Japan:
NAF Atsugi................................. 7 -1,117,000
CNFJ Yokosuka.............................. 1 -1,428,000
------------------------
Total.................................... 41 -10,312,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
construction
The Committee recommends $115,589,000 for new construction
as shown below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona: Yuma MCAS (100 units).......... .............. $17,000,000
Hawaii:
Kaneohe Bay MCAS (100 units)........ $5,320,000 26,615,000
Marine Corps Base (84 units)........ .............. 22,639,000
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex (133 6,031,000 30,168,000
units).............................
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex (96 3,831,000 19,167,000
units).............................
-------------------------------
Total............................. 15,182,000 115,589,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project No. of units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California:
NB San Diego........................ 8 $3,185,000
NAWC China Lake..................... 104 4,139,000
Hawaii:
NB Pearl Harbor..................... 28 3,730,000
NB Pearl Harbor..................... 19 4,156,000
NB Pearl Harbor..................... 112 18,055,000
NB Pearl Harbor..................... 25 4,582,000
North Carolina:
Camp Lejeune MCB.................... 91 9,100,000
Cherry Point MCAS................... .............. 2,700,000
Iceland: NAS Keflavik................... 101 15,977,000
Japan:
NAF Atsugi.......................... 7 1,117,000
NAF Atsugi.......................... 96 10,520,000
NAF Atsugi.......................... 36 2,955,000
NOF Saesbo.......................... 88 692,000
NOF Saesbo.......................... 272 447,000
PWC Yokosuka........................ 104 11,374,000
PWC Yokosuka........................ 46 4,588,000
PWC Yokosuka........................ 7 1,428,000
Puerto Rico: NS Roosevelt Roads......... 294 29,440,000
Guam: PWC Guam.......................... 72 13,314,000
Arizona: MCAS Yuma...................... 113 14,364,000
California: MCB Camp Pendleton.......... 100 4,441,000
District of Columbia:
Marine Barracks..................... 1 181,000
Marine Barracks..................... 1 158,000
Hawaii: MCB Kaneohe Bay................. 1 191,000
North Carolina: MCAS Cherry Point....... 103 2,024,000
Japan:
MCAS Iwakuni........................ 44 310,000
MCAS Iwakuni........................ 44 1,882,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. .............. 165,050,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Air Force
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $1,082,402,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 923,683,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,156,926,000
The Committee recommends $1,156,926,000 for family housing,
Air Force, in fiscal year 2000, which is $233,243,000 over the
budget request.
construction
The Committee recommends $187,611,000 for new construction,
instead of $50,418,000 as requested, as shown below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona: Davis-Monthan AFB (64 units)... $2,707,000 $10,000,000
California:
Beale AFB (60 units)................ 2,301,000 8,500,000
Edwards AFB (98 units).............. 4,404,000 16,270,000
Edwards AFB (90 units).............. 4,472,000 16,520,000
Vandenburg AFB (91 units)........... 4,548,000 16,800,000
District of Columbia: Bolling AFB (72 2,537,000 9,375,000
units).................................
Florida:
Eglin AFB (130 units)............... 3,812,000 14,080,000
MacDill AFB (54 units).............. 2,446,000 9,034,000
Kansas: McConnell AFB................... .............. 1,363,000
Mississippi: Columbus AFB (100 units)... 3,327,000 12,290,000
Montana: Malmstrom AFB (34 units)....... 2,050,000 7,570,000
Nebraska: Offutt AFB (72 units)......... 3,343,000 12,352,000
North Carolina: Seymour Johnson AFB (78 3,300,000 12,187,000
units).................................
North Dakota:
Grand Forks AFB (42 units).......... 2,720,000 10,050,000
Minot AFB (72 units)................ 2,912,000 10,756,000
Texas: Lackland AFB (48 units).......... 2,030,000 7,500,000
Portugal: Lajes AFB (Azores) (75 units). 3,509,000 12,964,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 50,418,000 187,611,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
construction improvements
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of
Location/project units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska: Elmendorf AFB.......................... 76 $10,536,000
Arkansas: Little Rock AFB...................... 83 4,196,000
Colorado: USAF Academy......................... ....... 650,000
District of Columbia: Bolling AFB.............. 6 455,000
Florida: Eglin Aux Field 9..................... ....... 650,000
Hawaii:
Hickam AFB................................. 87 16,900,000
Hickam AFB................................. 62 12,450,000
Maryland:
Andrews AFB................................ 54 5,791,000
Andrews AFB................................ 80 8,635,000
Montana: Malmstrom AFB......................... 46 5,810,000
Nebraska: Offutt AFB........................... 352 1,541,000
New Jersey: McGuire AFB........................ 34 4,100,000
South Carolina: Charleston AFB................. 50 5,500,000
Virginia: Langley AFB.......................... 23 4,000,000
Germany:
Ramstein AB................................ 62 8,500,000
Ramstein AB................................ 65 8,910,000
Ramstein AB................................ 102 5,100,000
Ramstein AB................................ 96 11,650,000
Spangdahlem AB............................. 20 3,144,000
Spangdahlem AB............................. 20 3,134,000
United Kingdom:
RAF Lakenheath............................. 42 4,600,000
RAF Midenhall.............................. 24 3,700, 000
------------------------
Total.................................... 1,334 129,952,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Housing Shortfall at Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID.--The
Committee is concerned about a severe shortage of quality
housing for airmen and families assigned to the 366th Wing,
Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID. This shortage is exacerbated
by the Air Force's decision not to proceed with housing
privatization. The family housing deficit will only worsen with
the increase in manpower from the new B-1B squadron. Local
rentals are limited and utilities are expensive, causing
financial hardship for junior enlisted personnel forced to
reside off base. The closest rental market is Boise, more than
50 miles from the installation.
It is unclear how the future housing needs of the 366th
Wing will be met. At the current rate of replacement for
housing at the base, new on-base housing will have to be
destroyed before the oldest units will be replaced. The
situation is unacceptable.
The Air Force has made quality-of-life a top priority. In
order to ensure that the Air Force fulfills this obligation,
the committee directs the Air Force to review the housing plan
for Mountain Home Air Force Base and provide a report to the
Congress that specifies how the family housing requirements
will be met over the future year defense plan. This report
should be provided to the congressional defense committees no
later than December 15, 1999.
Family Housing, Defense-wide
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $37,244,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 41,490,000
Committee recommendation................................ 41,490,000
The Committee recommends $41,490,000 for family housing,
defense-wide, in fiscal year 2000. This amount is equal to the
budget request. Specific details are included in the tables at
the end of the report.
Family Housing Revitalization Transfer Fund
Appropriation to date...................................................
Budget estimate, 2000...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ $25,000,000
The Committee recognizes that the readiness and retention
of the all volunteer force are largely related to the quality
of life which military personnel and their families enjoy. A
major component of this equation is the condition and
availability of military family housing. Many installations
lack sufficient funding to make small but significant
improvements to family housing. For example, several bases have
family quarters with serious safety concerns because of funding
shortfalls. Others installations have family quarters with
kitchens and bathrooms that require renovation. Some family
housing areas desperately need playground equipment and
landscaping. Other quarters need to be rewired to accommodate
today's electrical requirements and reduce the risk of fire
from out-of-code and outdated wiring.
In view of these continuing requirements and backlog of
projects, the Committee has provided $25,000,000 in a new
account in fiscal year 2000, the Family Housing Revitalization
Transfer Fund. This account is to fund military family housing
improvement projects within the United States, such as those
highlighted above. The funding should not be distributed on a
pro-rata share among the military services, but should be
allocated based on the conditions and outstanding requirements
of family housing units. Further, these funds shall not be
transferred to the Department of Defense Family Housing
Improvement Fund or used in conjunction with any housing
privatization initiative ongoing or anticipated.
The Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller) to provide a report to the congressional defense
committees on all additional projects to be funded prior to the
release of these funds and not later than October 31, 1999.
This report should include location, estimated cost and
projected commencement and completion dates.
Family Housing Improvement Fund
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $2,000,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 78,756,000
Committee recommendation................................ 25,000,000
The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for the family housing
privatization fund in fiscal year 2000 rather than $75,000,000
as requested in the budget. This reduction in funding is based
on an adjusted estimate of the number and timing of those
housing privatization projects that are likely to commence over
the next year.
The Committee is concerned that the Military Housing
Privatization Initiative is being regarded by the military
departments as a substitute for military family housing
construction. For example, in the fiscal year 2000 budget
submission, the Army requested no family housing construction
nor improvement projects for any military installation within
the United States. The Army's total family housing program
consists of four projects in Korea and Germany for a total
amount of $9,703,000. Further, the Army dropped all family
housing improvement and construction projects from the
Department's long-range plan.
It appears that the Department is scrambling to use the
family housing privatization authorities as a means to solve
all of their housing problems and deficits. With such limited
success to date, the Department must allow sufficient time to
fully capture lessons learned in all aspects of the process
before proceeding to a nationwide program. The Committee
insists that there must be several successful privatization
efforts from each service before this program proceeds on a
broader scale. There are simply many locations where housing
privatization is not economically feasible nor in the long-term
interest of the Department of Defense.
The Committee directs that the services execute those
family housing construction projects for which funds have been
appropriated rather than holding the funding as a potential
down payment for future housing privatization efforts. Further,
the Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to ensure that
future budget requests for the military family housing programs
of the military departments adequately address current and
anticipated requirements.
Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part IV
Appropriations, 1999.................................... $1,197,338,000
Budget estimate, 2000................................... 705,911,000
Committee recommendation................................ 705,911,000
The Committee recommends $705,911,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part IV. This is a decrease of
$918,591,000 from the amount appropriated for fiscal year 1999
but equal to the budget request.
The Committee notes the assurances of the Department of
Defense that the requested amount of $705,911,000 is adequate
to address requirements in fiscal year 2000. Consistent with
those assurances, the Committee expects no delay in the timely
environmental remediation of realigning or closing
installations and no deferral in the reuse of affected military
installations.-
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense
Department, and new provisions. The Committee recommendations
are as follows:
Sec. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee
contract for work, except in cases of contracts for
environmental restoration at base closure sites.
Sec. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor
vehicles.
Sec. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.
Sec. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the
continental United States for which specific appropriations
have not been made.
Sec. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or
land easements.
Sec. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land,
prepare a site, or install utilities for any family housing
except housing for which funds have been made available.
Sec. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to
transfer or relocate activities among installations.
Sec. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless
American producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been
allowed to compete.
Sec. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in
foreign nations.
Sec. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas
without prior notification.
Sec. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference
of $500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.
Sec. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors
for military construction in the United States territories and
possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the
Arabian Gulf.
Sec. 113. Requires notification of military exercises
involving construction in excess of $100,000.
Sec. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of
the year.
Sec. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be
available for construction authorized during the current
session of Congress.
Sec. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay
the cost of supervision for any project being completed with
lapsed funds.
Sec. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1
fiscal year to execute a construction project, provided that
the total obligation for such project is consistent with the
total amount appropriated for the project.
Sec. 118. Allows expired funds to be transferred to the
``Foreign currency fluctuations, construction, defense''
account.
Sec. 119. Directs the Department to report annually on
actions taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater
share of the common defense budget.
Sec. 120. Allows transfer of proceeds from ``Base
realignment and closure accounts, part I'' to the continuing
base realignment and closure accounts.
Sec. 121. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership
for Peace Program.
Sec. 122. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the
congressional defense committees of all family housing
privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any
clause providing consideration for base realignment and
closure, force reductions and extended deployments.
Sec. 123. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners
Assistance Program.
Sec. 124. Requires congressional notification of any
expenditure of $25,000 or more for repair and maintenance of
flag/general officers' quarters.
Sec. 125. Provides a 5-percent reduction of the
construction contingency account.
Sec. 126. Requires the Secretary of Defense to report on
the adequacy of special education facilities for Department of
Defense family members.
Sec. 127. Amends the 1999 Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act to allow the Department of Defense to
transfer military construction funding to the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.
Sec. 128. Restricts the conveyance of land at the former
Fort Sheridan, IL.
Sec. 129. Restricts construction of chemical
demilitarization facilities at the Bluegrass Army Depot, KY.,
until reporting requirements have been met by the Secretary of
Defense.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
Due to the early Committee action on the fiscal year 2000
Military Construction appropriations bill, an original Senate
bill was reported by the Appropriations Committee to the
Senate.
The Committee has acted in good faith in its attempt to
comply fully with requirements stipulated under paragraph 7,
rule XVI.
The Committee anticipates that Congress will authorize the
amounts appropriated in this act.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, the Committee
ordered reported en bloc, S. 1205, an original fiscal year 2000
Military Construction Appropriations bill, and S. 1206, an
original fiscal year 2000 Legislative Branch Appropriations
bill, and an original fiscal year 2000 Commerce, Justice,
State, and the Judiciary Appropriations bill, all subject to
amendment and subject to the section 302 budget allocations, by
a recorded vote of 28-0, a quorum being present.
Yeas Nays
Chairman Stevens
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Specter
Mr. Domenici
Mr. Bond
Mr. Gorton
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Burns
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mr. Campbell
Mr. Craig
Mrs. Hutchison
Mr. Kyl
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Inouye
Mr. Hollings
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Reid
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray
Mr. Dorgan
Mrs. Feinstein
Mr. Durbin
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the committee.''
1999 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 106-31
TITLE II--EMERGENCY NATIONAL SECURITY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS
CHAPTER 1
* * * * * * *
CHAPTER 6
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION TRANSFER FUND
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
For emergency expenses incurred by United States military
forces in support of overseas operations; $475,000,000, to
remain available for transfer until September 30, 2003:
Provided, That the Secretary of Defense may transfer these
funds only to military construction accounts and to the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as
provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code:
Provided further, That the transfer authority provided in this
paragraph is in addition to any other transfer authority
contained in this or any other Act: Provided further, That
notwithstanding any other provision of law, such funds may be
obligated or expended to carry out military construction
projects not otherwise authorized by law: Provided further,
That the entire amount made available under this heading is
designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant
to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1995, as amended: Provided further, That
this amount shall be available only to the extent that the
President transmits to the Congress an official budget request
that includes designation of the entire amount of the request
as an emergency requirement as defined in the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1995, as amended.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee Change from
Installation and project Budget recommen- budget
request dation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ARMY: ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT: 7,000 .......... -7,000
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE VII)...........
AIR FORCE: MAXWELL AFB: OTS .......... 10,600 +10,600
CADET DORMITORY................
DEFENSE-WIDE: ANNISTON ARMY .......... 7,000 +7,000
DEPOT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE VII)....................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: REDSTONE .......... 8,916 +8,916
ARSENAL: UNIT TRAINING
EQUIPMENT SITE................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DANNELLY .......... 6,000 +6,000
FIELD: MEDICAL TRAINING AND
DINING FACILITY................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA............ 7,000 32,516 +25,516
=======================================
ALASKA
ARMY:
FORT RICHARDSON: WHOLE 2,200 14,600 +12,400
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL...
FORT WAINWRIGHT:
EMISSION REDUCTION 2,300 15,500 +13,200
FACILITY...............
MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING .......... 17,000 +17,000
FACILITY...............
AMMUNITION SURVEILLANCE .......... 2,300 +2,300
FACILITY...............
AIR FORCE:
EIELSON AFB:
REPAIR KC-135 PARKING 941 4,000 +3,059
RAMP...................
REPAIR RUNWAY........... 3,334 14,000 +10,666
WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEM 1,451 6,100 +4,649
FACILITY...............
ELMENDORF AFB:
ALTER ROADWAY DAVIS HWY. .......... 9,500 +9,500
CONSTRUCT C-130 PARKING 3,995 17,000 +13,005
RAMP...................
DORMITORY............... 3,727 15,800 +12,073
DEFENSE-WIDE:
EIELSON AFB: HYDRANT FUEL 9,000 26,000 +17,000
SYSTEM.....................
ELMENDORF AFB HYDRANT FUEL 4,700 23,500 +18,800
SYSTEM.....................
FORT WAINWRIGHT: HOSPITAL 18,000 18,000 ..............
REPLACEMENT (PHASE I)......
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT 2,940 13,850 +10,910
RICHARDSON: CSMS/MATES.........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: KULIS ANGB: 2,170 10,000 +7,830
COMPOSITE SUPPORT COMPLEX......
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA............. 54,758 207,150 +152,392
=======================================
ARIZONA
NAVY:
CAMP NAVAJO NAVY DETACHMENT: 1,910 7,560 +5,650
MAGAZINES MODERNIZATION....
YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 640 2,620 +1,980
ADDITION...............
LAND ACQUISITION........ 3,650 14,400 +10,750
AIR FORCE: DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB: 1,847 7,800 +5,953
AIRCRAFT PROCESSING RAMP.......
DEFENSE-WIDE: DAVIS MONTHAN AFB: 2,400 10,000 +7,600
ADD/ALTER AMBULATORY HEALTH
CARE CENTER....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA............ 10,447 42,380 +31,933
=======================================
ARKANSAS
ARMY:
PINE BLUFF ARSENAL:
AMMUNITION 61,800 .......... -61,800
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE IV)....
CHEMICAL DEFENSE .......... 18,000 +18,000
QUALIFICATION FACILITY.
DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF .......... 61,800 +61,800
ARSENAL: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE IV).....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: LITTLE ROCK 1,881 8,699 +6,818
AFB: VEHICLE/BASE ENGINE
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: LITTLE ROCK 209 800 +591
AFB: ALTER AERIAL PORT TRAINING
FACIL- ITY....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS........... 63,890 89,299 +25,409
=======================================
CALIFORNIA
ARMY: FORT IRWIN: ROTATIONAL 3,300 13,400 +10,100
UNIT FACILITY MAINTENANCE AREA.
NAVY:
BARSTOW MARINE CORPS 1,150 4,670 +3,520
LOGISTICS BASE: TEST TRACK/
TEST POND FACILITY.........
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS
BASE:
ARMORY.................. 660 2,620 +1,960
BACHELOR ENLISTED 2,390 9,740 +7,350
QUARTERS...............
INTEGRATED 960 3,810 +2,850
COMMUNICATIONS HUB.....
STAFF NON-COMMISSIONED 1,640 6,480 +4,840
OFFICER'S ACADEMY......
TACTICAL VEHICLE 2,210 9,010 +6,800
MAINTENANCE FACILITY...
LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION:
AIRCRAFT ORDNANCE 3,010 11,900 +8,890
LOADING FACILITIES.....
AVIATION ARMAMENT 1,460 5,800 +4,340
FACILITY...............
ENGINE MAINTENANCE SHOP 600 2,360 +1,760
ADDITION...............
STRIKE FIGHTER WEAPONS 1,000 3,960 +2,960
TRAINING FACILITY......
NORTH ISLAND NAVAL AIR 40,760 54,420 +13,660
STATION: BERTHING WHARF
(PHASE I)..................
SAN DIEGO NAVAL MEDICAL 5,470 21,590 +16,120
CENTER: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS MODERNIZATION.....
SAN DIEGO MARINE CORPS 810 3,200 +2,390
RECRUIT DEPOT: PHYSICAL
FITNESS CENTER ADDITION....
TWENTYNINE PALMS MARINE
CORPS BASE:
BACHELOR ENLISTED 4,840 19,130 +14,290
QUARTERS...............
CAST TRAINER ADDITION... 420 1,670 +1,250
TACTICAL VEHICLE 3,420 13,960 +10,540
MAINTENANCE FACILITY...
TWENTYNINE PALMS NAVAL 1,930 7,640 +5,710
HOSPITAL: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS...................
AIR FORCE:
BEALE AFB: FLIGHTLINE FIRE 2,086 8,900 +6,814
STATION....................
TRAVIS AFB: ADD TO PHYSICAL 1,754 7,500 +5,746
FITNESS CENTER.............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS 2,272 6,000 +3,728
BASE: NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE
C\2\ ADDITION..............
LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE: 2,400 13,600 +11,200
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC
REPLACEMENT................
PRESIDIO, MONTEREY DOD 6,712 28,000 +21,288
CENTER RENOVATION..........
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE: WAR 2,000 7,500 +5,500
READINESS MATERIALS
WAREHOUSE/ENGINEERING SUPP.
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
FRESNO ANGS OPS TRNG AND .......... 9,100 +9,100
DINING FACILITY............
MOFFETT FIELD: REPLACE 3,033 14,000 +10,967
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR
NAVY RESERVE: CAMP PENDLETON 1,649 9,940 +8,291
MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER:
RESERVE TRAINING COMPLEX.......
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA......... 97,936 299,900 +201,964
=======================================
COLORADO
ARMY:
PETERSON AFB: US ARMY SPACE 3,700 25,000 +21,300
COMMAND HEADQUARTERS.......
PUEBLO DEPOT ACTIVITY: 11,800 .......... -11,800
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I).........
AIR FORCE:
PETERSON AFB: USSPACECOM/ 7,887 33,000 +25,113
NORAD HEADQUARTERS.........
SCHRIEVER AFB:
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER. 929 3,900 +2,971
SANITARY SEWER LINE..... 1,296 5,500 +4,204
US AIR FORCE ACADEMY: 4,056 17,500 +13,444
UPGRADE ACADEMIC FACILITY..
DEFENSE-WIDE: PUEBLO ARMY DEPOT: .......... 11,800 +11,800
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I).............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO........... 29,668 96,700 +67,032
=======================================
CONNECTICUT
ARMY RESERVE: WEST HARTFORD: .......... 17,525 +17,525
ADAL RESERVE CENTER............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ORANGE ANGS: .......... 11,000 +11,000
AIR CONTROL SQD COMPLEX........
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONNECTICUT........ .......... 28,525 +28,525
=======================================
DELAWARE
AIR FORCE: DOVER AFB: VISITORS .......... 12,000 +12,000
QUARTERS.......................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SMYRNA: .......... 4,381 +4,381
READINESS CENTER...............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, DELAWARE........... .......... 16,381 +16,381
=======================================
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ARMY:
FORT MCNAIR: CHAPEL......... 380 1,250 +870
WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL 1,020 6,800 +5,780
CENTER: PHYSICAL FITNESS
TRAINING CENTER............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF 1,400 8,050 +6,650
COLUMBIA...............
=======================================
FLORIDA
NAVY: WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR 1,200 4,750 +3,550
STATION: JPATS T-6A TRAINER
FACILITY.......................
AIR FORCE:
EGLIN AFB:
DORMITORY............... 1,635 7,000 +5,365
SQUADRON OPERATIONS 1,566 6,600 +5,034
FACILITY...............
EGLIN AFB AUXILIARY FIELD 9:
DORMITORY............... 2,161 9,100 +6,939
REPAIR RUNWAY/TAXIWAY... 2,269 9,700 +7,431
MACDILL AFB: ADD/ALTER 1,302 5,500 +4,198
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER....
PATRICK AFB:
AIR FREIGHT/PASSENGER 1,967 8,300 +6,333
TERMINAL FACILITY......
BASE SUPPLY/TRAFFIC 2,238 9,500 +7,262
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX....
DEFENSE-WIDE:
JACKSONVILLE NAVAL AIR 780 3,780 +3,000
STATION: ADD/ALTER BRANCH
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC......
PATRICK AFB: MEDICAL 200 1,750 +1,550
LOGISTICS FACILITY
REPLACEMENT................
PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION: 1,300 4,300 +3,000
AIRCREW WATER SURVIVAL
TRAINING FACILITY..........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: PENSACOLA: .......... 4,628 +4,628
READINESS CENTER...............
ARMY RESERVE: ORLANDO: LAND 690 690 ..............
ACQUISITION, JOINT RESERVE
COMPLEX........................
AIR FORCE RESERVE: HOMESTEAD 524 2,000 +1,476
ARB: FIRE FIGHTER TRAINING
FACILITY.......................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA............ 17,832 77,598 +59,766
=======================================
GEORGIA
ARMY:
FORT BENNING:
AMMUNITION HOLDING AREA. 420 1,400 +980
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 7,100 47,000 +39,900
RENEWAL................
FORT STEWART:
CONTINGENCY LOGISTICS .......... 19,000 +19,000
FACILITY...............
MULTI-PURPOSE TRAINING 1,100 7,200 +6,100
RANGE..................
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 7,000 7,000 ..............
RENEWAL W/DINING.......
NAVY: ALBANY MARINE CORPS 1,540 6,260 +4,720
LOGISTICS BASE: FIELD
MAINTENANCE SHOP...............
NAVY RESERVE: NAS ATLANTA: BEQ-A .......... 5,430 +5,430
AIR FORCE:
FORT BENNING: AIR SUPPORT 911 3,900 +2,989
OPERATIONS SQUADRON
FACILITY...................
MOODY AFB: SQUADRON 763 3,200 +2,437
OPERATIONS FACILITY........
ROBINS AFB KC-135 FLIGHT 789 3,350 +2,561
SIMULATOR FACILITY.........
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BENNING: REGIMENTAL 2,272 10,200 +7,928
COMMAND AND CONTROL
FACILITY...................
MOODY AFB: WAR READINESS 200 1,250 +1,050
MATERIALS WAREHOUSE/
BIOENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING FACILITY.......
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
SAVANNAH INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT:
COMPOSITE SUPPORT 2,116 9,800 +7,684
COMPLEX................
REGIONAL FIRE TRAINING 368 1,700 +1,332
FACILITY...............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT GILLEM: USAR 3,610 22,121 +18,511
CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/DIRECT SUPPORT/
WAREHOUSE......................
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
DOBBINS AFB: ADD/ALTER 558 2,130 +1,572
FACILITY FOR C130-H AIRCREW
TRAINING...................
ROBINS AFB: ADD/ALTER AIR 3,666 14,000 +10,334
FORCE RESERVE COMMAND
HEADQUARTERS AND ALTERNATE
TANKER AIRLIFT CONTROL
CENTER.....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA.......... 32,413 164,941 +132,528
=======================================
HAWAII
ARMY: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: WHOLE 14,200 14,200 ..............
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.......
NAVY:
CAMP H.M. SMITH: CINCPAC 15,870 15,870 ..............
HEADQUARTERS (PHASE I).....
KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS AIR 1,460 5,790 +4,330
STATION: CONTROL TOWER AND
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
FACILITY...................
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL SHIPYARD: 2,690 10,610 +7,920
ABRASIVE BLAST AND PAINT
FACILITY...................
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL STATION: 4,720 18,600 +13,880
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
MODERNIZATION..............
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL SUBMARINE 7,470 29,460 +21,990
BASE: BERTHING WHARF.......
AIR FORCE: HICKAM AFB: FIRE 785 3,300 +2,515
TRAINING FACILITY..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BELLOWS AFS: .......... 12,105 +12,105
REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE
(PHASE II)....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII............. 47,195 109,935 +62,740
=======================================
IDAHO
NAVY: BAYVIEW NAVAL SURFACE 2,540 10,040 +7,500
WEAPONS CENTER: UNDERWATER
EQUIPMENT LABORATORY...........
AIR FORCE:
MOUNTAIN HOME AFB:
DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD..... 564 2,400 +1,836
ENHANCED TRAINING RANGE 3,487 14,600 +11,113
(PHASE II).............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
GOWEN FIELD:
A-10 EXPAND ARM/DISARM 350 1,600 +1,250
APRON..................
FUEL CELL AND CORROSION .......... 2,300 +2,300
CONTROL HANGER.........
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO.......... 6,941 30,940 +23,999
=======================================
ILLINOIS
NAVY:
GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING
CENTER:
ALL WEATHER RUNNING 354 1,380 +1,026
TRACK..................
BACHELOR ENLISTED 7,700 31,410 +23,710
QUARTERS (``A'' SCHOOL)
DRILL HALL REPLACEMENT.. 2,830 11,190 +8,360
RECRUIT IN-PROCESS 3,370 13,310 +9,940
BARRACK................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MARSEILLES: 2,325 10,952 +8,627
BATTALION TRAINING COMPLEX.....
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS........... 16,579 68,242 +51,663
=======================================
INDIANA
ARMY: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION 61,200 .......... -61,200
PLANT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE II).....................
DEFENSE-WIDE: NEWPORT ARMY .......... 61,200 +61,200
AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE II).....................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT WAYNE: .......... 7,200 +7,200
MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY/
DINING HALL....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA............ 61,200 68,400 +7,200
=======================================
IOWA
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SIOUX CITY: .......... 3,600 +3,600
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX....
=======================================
KANSAS
ARMY:
FORT LEAVENWORTH:
US DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS 18,800 18,800 ..............
(PHASE III)............
WATER TREATMENT PLANT... 1,200 8,100 +6,900
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 3,900 26,000 +22,100
RENEWAL................
FORT RILEY: WHOLE BARRACKS .......... 27,000 +27,000
RENOVATION.................
AIR FORCE: MCCONNELL AFB; KC-135 2,280 9,600 +7,320
SQUAD OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE UNIT...............
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT RILEY: 1,060 6,000 +4,940
CONSOLIDATED TROOP MEDICAL
CLINIC.........................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS............. 27,240 95,500 +68,260
=======================================
KENTUCKY
ARMY:
BLUEGRASS ARMY DEPOT:
AMMUNITION 11,800 .......... -11,800
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I).....
AMMUNITION 11,000 .......... -11,000
DEMILITARIZATION
SUPPORT................
FORT CAMPBELL:
MOUT TRAINING COMPLEX... 2,150 14,400 +12,250
PHYSICAL FITNESS 900 6,000 +5,100
TRAINING CENTER........
SABRE HELIPORT 2,475 19,500 +17,025
IMPROVEMENTS...........
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 4,800 32,000 +27,200
RENEWAL (PHASE II).....
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE .......... 17,000 +17,000
FACILITY...............
FORT KNOX: MULTI-PURPOSE 2,400 2,400 ..............
DIGITAL TRAINING RANGE
(PHASE II).................
AIR FORCE: FORT CAMPBELL: AIR 1,472 6,300 +4,828
SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON
FACILITY.......................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT:
AMMUNITION .......... 11,800 +11,800
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I).....
AMMUNITION .......... 11,000 +11,000
DEMILITARIZATION
SUPPORT................
AMMUNITION SURVEILLANCE 900 6,000 +5,100
FACILITY...............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY....... 37,897 126,400 +88,503
=======================================
LOUISIANA
ARMY RESERVE: FORT POLK: .......... 4,309 +4,309
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP
NAVY RESERVE: LAFAYETTE: MARINE .......... 3,330 +3,330
CORPS RESERVE CENTER...........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NAS BELLE .......... 1,350 +1,350
CHASSE: AMMUNITION STORAGE
IGLOO..........................
=======================================
MAINE
NAVY: BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR 4,270 16,890 +12,620
STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS REPLACEMENT...........
=======================================
MARYLAND
ARMY:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: 66,600 .......... -66,600
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE II)........
FORT MEADE:
MILITARY ENTRANCE 1,350 4,450 +3,100
PROCESSING STATION.....
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 2,700 18,000 +15,300
RENEWAL................
NAVY: INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE 2,550 10,070 +7,520
WARFARE CENTER: SEWAGE
TREATMENT PLANT................
AIR FORCE: ANDREWS AFB: SQUADRON .......... 9,900 +9,900
OPERATIONS FACILITY............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: .......... 66,600 +66,600
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE II)........
ANDREWS AFB: ADD/ALTER 2,000 3,000 +1,000
MEDICAL LOGISTICS FACILITY.
FORT MEADE:
PERIMETER FENCE (EAST).. 903 903 ..............
RECONFIGURE OPS1 CHILLED 2,043 2,043 ..............
WATER..................
PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR 1,200 4,150 +2,950
STATION: AIRCREW WATER
SURVIVAL TRAINING FACILITY.
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND......... 79,346 119,116 +39,770
=======================================
MASSACHUSETTS
ARMY: WESTOVER AFB: MILITARY 1,200 4,000 +2,800
ENTRANCE PROCESSING STATION....
AIR FORCE: HANSCOM AFB: .......... 16,000 +16,000
ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT FACILITY
RENOVATION.....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS...... 1,200 20,000 +18,800
=======================================
MICHIGAN
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP .......... 5,800 +5,800
GRAYLING: AIR GROUND RANGE
SUPPORT FACIL- ITY............
=======================================
MINNESOTA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP .......... 10,368 +10,368
RIPLEY: COMBINED SUPPORT
MAINTENANCE SHOP..............
=======================================
MISSISSIPPI
NAVY:
GULFPORT NAVAL CONSTRUCTION 3,260 12,860 +9,600
BATTALION CENTER: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS
MODERNIZATION..............
GULFPORT NAVAL CONSTRUCTION 1,600 6,310 +4,710
TRAINING CENTER: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS
RENOVATION.................
AIR FORCE:
COLUMBUS AFB: ADD TO T-1A .......... 2,600 +2,600
HANGAR.....................
KEESLER AFB:
C-130J SIMULATOR .......... 8,900 +8,900
FACILITY...............
STUDENT DINING FACILITY. 1,686 7,100 +5,414
STUDENT DORMITORY....... 4,679 19,900 +15,221
DEFENSE-WIDE: MISSISSIPPI ARMY
AMMUNITION PLANT:
SMALL CRAFT TRAINING COMPLEX 9,600 9,600 ..............
LAND/WATER RANGES........... .......... 3,300 +3,300
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP SHELBY: MULTI-PURPOSE .......... 14,900 +14,900
RANGE COMPLEX (PHASE III)..
VICKSBURG: READINESS CENTER. .......... 5,914 +5,914
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: JACKSON .......... 3,600 +3,600
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: C-17
SIMULATOR BUILDING.............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI........ 20,825 94,984 +74,159
=======================================
MISSOURI
ARMY: FORT LEONARD WOOD: 1,600 10,600 +9,000
WOLVERINE/GRIZZLY SIMULATOR
FACILITY.......................
AIR FORCE: WHITEMAN AFB:
B-2 LOW OBSERVABLE 5,428 23,000 +17,572
RESTORATION FACILITY.......
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER..... 447 1,900 +1,453
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ROSENCRANS .......... 9,000 +9,000
MEM APT: UPGRADE AIRCRAFT
PARKING APRON (PHASE II).......
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI........... 7,475 44,500 +37,025
=======================================
MONTANA
AIR FORCE: MALMSTROM AFB: .......... 11,600 +11,600
DORMITORY......................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: GREAT FALLS .......... 1,400 +1,400
IAP: BASE SUPPLY WAREHOUSE.....
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA............ .......... 13,000 +13,000
=======================================
NEBRASKA
AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AFB: DORMITORY 1,941 8,300 +6,359
=======================================
NEVADA
ARMY: HAWTHORNE ARMY DEPOT: .......... 1,700 +1,700
CONTAINER REPAIR FACILITY......
AIR FORCE: NELLIS AFB:
F-22 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 1,859 7,800 +5,941
HANGAR.....................
F-22 COMPOSITE AND 1,756 7,500 +5,744
FABRICATION SHOP...........
F-22 PARTS WAREHOUSE AND 773 3,300 +2,527
OPERATIONS ADDITION........
LAND ACQUISITION............ .......... 11,600 +11,600
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA............. 4,388 31,900 +27,512
=======================================
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NAVY: PORTSMOUTH: WATERFRONT .......... 3,850 +3,850
CRANE..........................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE TRADE .......... 9,600 +9,600
PORT: UPGRADE KC-135 PARKING
APRON..........................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE...... .......... 13,450 +13,450
=======================================
NEW JERSEY
ARMY: FORT MONMONTH: BARRACKS .......... 11,800 +11,800
IMPROVEMENT....................
NAVY: LAKEHURST NAVAL AIR 3,970 15,710 +11,740
WARFARE CENTER: AIRCRAFT/
PLATFORM INTERFACE LABORATORY..
AIR FORCE: MCGUIRE AFB: VISITING 2,765 11,800 +9,035
QUARTERS.......................
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DIX: 1,607 5,624 +4,017
CENTRALIZED TACTICAL VEHICLE
WASH FACILITY..................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY......... 8,342 44,934 +36,592
=======================================
NEW MEXICO
AIR FORCE:
KIRTLAND AFB: COMPOSITE .......... 9,700 +9,700
SUPPORT COMPLEX............
CANNON AFB:
CONTROL TOWER........... .......... 4,000 +4,000
REPAIR RUNWAY #2204..... .......... 8,100 +8,100
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO..... .......... 21,800 +21,800
=======================================
NEW YORK
ARMY: UNITED STATES MILITARY 28,500 28,500 ..............
ACADEMY: CADET PHYSICAL
DEVELOPMENT CENTER (PHASE II)..
AIR FORCE: ROME RESEARCH SITE: 3,002 12,800 +9,798
CONSOLIDATE INTELLIGENCE AND
RECONNAISSANCE LAB.............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT WADSWORTH: 2,066 5,786 +3,720
ADD/ALTER USAR CENTER/
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP/
AREA MAINT SUPPORT ACTIVITY
(PHASE II).....................
AIR FORCE RESERVE: NIAGARA .......... 6,300 +6,300
FALLS: VISITING OFFICERS
QUARTERS.......................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK........... 33,568 53,386 +19,818
=======================================
NORTH CAROLINA
ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
HEAVY DROP RIGGING 4,500 30,000 +25,500
FACILITY...............
MOUT TRAINING COMPLEX 5,600 7,000 +1,400
(PHASE II).............
UPGRADE BARRACKS D-AREA. .......... 14,400 +14,400
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 16,508 16,508 ..............
RENEWAL................
SUNNY POINT MILITARY OCEAN 550 3,800 +3,250
TERMINAL: AMMUNITION
SURVEILLANCE FACILITY......
NAVY:
CAMP LEJEUNE:
MARINE CORPS BASE 2,120 8,400 +6,280
MAINTENANCE AND
OPERATIONS FACILITY....
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER. 1,070 4,230 +3,160
ROAD AND UTILITY 2,140 8,750 +6,610
CONSTRUCTION...........
NEW RIVER MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
AIRCRAFT TAXIWAY 130 520 +390
ADDITION...............
FAMILY SERVICES CENTER.. 330 1,340 +1,010
PROPERTY CONTROL 910 3,610 +2,700
FACILITY...............
AIR FORCE:
FORT BRAGG: AIR SUPPORT 1,076 4,600 +3,524
OPERATIONS GROUP FACILITY..
POPE AFB: DANGEROUS CARGO 1,802 7,700 +5,898
PAD........................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP LEJUNE MCB: TARAWA 2,387 10,570 +8,183
TERRACE II ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL.....................
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS 1,000 3,500 +2,500
AIR STATION: AIRCREW WATER
SURVIVAL TRAINING FACILITY.
FORT BRAGG:
BATTALION OPERATIONS 2,272 18,600 +16,328
COMPLEX................
DEPLOYABLE EQUIPMENT 1,500 1,500 ..............
FACILITY...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CHARLOTTE:
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE 912 4,297 +3,385
SHOP.......................
READINESS CENTER............ 1,504 7,087 +5,583
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA..... 46,311 156,412 +110,101
=======================================
NORTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE: GRAND FORKS AFB: .......... 9,500 +9,500
PARKING APRON EXTENSION........
=======================================
OHIO
AIR FORCE: WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB:
CONSOLIDATE AVIONICS 3,230 13,600 +10,370
RESEARCH LABORATORY........
CONTROL TOWER............... 934 4,000 +3,066
CONVERT TO PHYSICAL FITNESS .......... 4,600 +4,600
CENTER.....................
DEFENSE-WIDE: WRIGHT-PATTERSON 2,800 3,900 +1,100
AFB: OCCUPATIONAL HEATH CLINIC/
BIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REPLACEMENT....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SPRINGFIELD .......... 1,770 +1,770
F-16 SQD OPS FLT TNG COMPLEX...
NAVY RESERVE: COLUMBUS AFB: .......... 3,541 +3,541
RESERVE CENTER ADDITION........
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO............... 6,964 31,411 +24,447
=======================================
OKLAHOMA
ARMY:
MCALESTER ARMY AMMUNITION
PLANT:
AMMUNITION ROAD 1,020 6,800 +5,780
INFRASTRUCTURE.........
FIRE STATION............ 900 3,000 +2,100
RAILYARD INFRASTRUCTURE. 2,000 6,800 +4,800
FORT SILL: RAIL AND 2,000 13,200 +11,200
CONTAINERIZATION FACILITY..
AIR FORCE:
TINKER AFB:
AIR DRIVEN ACCESS 4,001 17,000 +12,999
OVERHAUL AND TEST
FACILITY...............
DORMITORY............... 1,602 6,800 +5,198
REPAIR AND UPGRADE .......... 11,000 +11,000
RUNWAY.................
VANCE AFB: UPGRADE CENTER .......... 12,600 +12,600
RUNWAY.....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: TULSA IAP: .......... 10,800 +10,800
COMPOSITE SUPPORT COMPLEX......
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA........... 11,523 88,000 +76,477
=======================================
OREGON
ARMY: UMATILLA ARMY DEPOT: 35,900 .......... -35,900
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE V).............
DEFENSE-WIDE: UMATILLA ARMY .......... 35,900 +35,900
DEPOT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE V)......................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SALEM ARMED .......... 15,255 +15,255
FORCES RESERVE CENTER..........
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, OREGON............. 35,900 51,155 +15,255
=======================================
PENNSYLVANIA
ARMY:
CARLISLE BARRACKS: WHOLE 750 5,000 +4,250
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL...
LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT: 570 3,650 +3,080
AMMUNITION CONTAINERIZATION
COMPLEX....................
NAVY:
MECHANICSBURG NAVAL 760 2,990 +2,230
INVENTORY CONTROL POINT:
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS...............
NORFOLK NSY DETACHMENT .......... 13,320 +13,320
(PHILADELPHIA): CASTING
PITS MODERNIZATION.........
DEFENSE-WIDE: DEF DIST DEPOT NEW 867 5,000 +4,133
CUMBERLAND-DDSP PUBLIC SAFETY
CENTER.........................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: JOHNSTOWN .......... 6,200 +6,200
ANGS: AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
FACILITY.......................
NAVY RESERVE: WILLOW GROVE NAVAL
AIR STATION:
GROUND EQUIPMENT SHOP....... .......... 600 +600
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE 320 1,930 +1,610
FACILITY...................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA....... 3,267 38,690 +35,423
=======================================
RHODE ISLAND
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: QUONSET: .......... 16,500 +16,500
MAINTENANCE HANGER AND SHOPS...
=======================================
SOUTH CAROLINA
ARMY: FORT JACKSON: EMERGENCY 1,100 7,400 +6,300
SERVICES CENTER................
NAVY:
BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
ARMORY FACILITY......... 450 1,790 +1,340
CORROSION CONTROL 2,200 8,700 +6,500
FACILITY...............
CHARLESTON NAVAL WEAPONS 1,930 7,640 +5,710
STATION: AIR TRAFFIC
CONTROL ENGINEERING
FACILITY...................
AIR FORCE: CHARLESTON AFB: C-17 4,389 18,200 +13,811
CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY.....
DEFENSE-WIDE: LAUREL BAY ISLAND: 642 2,874 +2,232
INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL ADDITION...
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: MCENTIRE .......... 8,000 +8,000
ANGS: CONTROL TOWER............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA..... 10,711 54,604 +43,893
=======================================
SOUTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: .......... 10,200 +10,200
EDUCATION/LIBRARY CENTER.......
=======================================
TENNESSEE
AIR FORCE: ARNOLD AFB: UPGRADE 1,851 7,800 +5,949
JET ENGINE AIR INDUCT SYSTEM
(PHASE III)....................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HENDERSON: .......... 1,976 +1,976
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, TENNESSEE.......... 1,851 9,776 +7,925
=======================================
TEXAS
ARMY:
FORT BLISS:
AIR DEPLOYMENT FACILITY 2,550 17,000 +14,450
COMPLEX................
AIRCRAFT LOADING APRON.. 3,300 22,000 +18,700
AMMUNITION HOT LOAD 1,700 11,400 +9,700
FACILITY...............
FORT HOOD:
DEPLOYMENT READY 2,000 8,000 +6,000
REACTIVE FIELD AND
TRAILS.................
FIXED WING AIRCRAFT 4,600 31,000 +26,400
PARKING APRON..........
FORCE XXI, SOLDIER 14,000 14,000 ..............
DEVELOPMENT CENTER
(PHASE II).............
RAIL HEAD FACILITY 14,800 14,800 ..............
(PHASE II).............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 4,350 29,000 +24,650
RENEWAL................
AIR FORCE:
DYESS AFB: CHILD DEVELOPMENT .......... 5,400 +5,400
CENTER.....................
LACKLAND AFB:
DORMITORY............... 1,257 5,300 +4,043
SECURITY FORCES CENTER.. 1,893 8,100 +6,207
LAUGHLIN AFB: ADD/ALTER 766 3,250 +2,484
JPATS BEDDOWN VARIOUS
FACILITIES.................
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT SAM HOUSTON: 600 5,800 +5,200
VETERINARY INSTRUCTIONAL
FACILITY.......................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: LACKLAND .......... 9,700 +9,700
AFB: F-16 SQUADRON OPS FLIGHT
TRNG COMPLEX...................
ARMY RESERVE: FORT HOOD: AREA 2,684 9,431 +6,747
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT ACTIVITY/
EQUIPMENT CONCENTRATION SITE...
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS.............. 54,500 194,181 +139,681
=======================================
UTAH
ARMY: SALT LAKE: RED BUTTE DAM.. .......... 8,000 +8,000
AIR FORCE: HILL AFB: CAD/PAD 1,081 4,600 +3,519
SPARES STORAGE FACILITY........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SALT LAKE .......... 9,700 +9,700
CITY IAP: UPGRADE AIRCRAFT
MAINTE- NANCE.................
NAVY RESERVE: CAMP WILLIAMS: 150 890 +740
MARINE CORPS RESERVE TRAINING
CENTER ADDITION................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH............... 1,231 23,190 +21,959
=======================================
VERMONT
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: NORTHFIELD: .......... 8,652 +8,652
MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING FACILITY.
=======================================
VIRGINIA
ARMY:
FORT BELVOIR:
FIRE STATION............ 500 1,700 +1,200
MILITARY POLICE STATION. 640 2,150 +1,510
FORT EUSTIS: WHOLE BARRACKS 5,800 39,000 +33,200
COMPLEX RENEWAL............
FORT MYER: PUBLIC SAFETY 870 2,900 +2,030
CENTER.....................
NAVY:
DAM NECK FLEET COMBAT 2,610 10,310 +7,700
TRAINING CENTER: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS..........
NORFOLK NAVAL STATION:
BERTHING PIER (PHASE II) 12,690 12,690 ..............
PIER ELECTRICAL UPGRADES 4,720 18,660 +13,940
(PHASE II).............
PIER REPLACEMENT........ 8,600 40,000 +31,400
WATERFRONT ATHLETIC 2,760 10,890 +8,130
COMPLEX................
NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD: 4,460 17,630 +13,170
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
REPLACEMENT................
OCEANA NAVAL AIR STATION: 2,910 11,490 +8,580
AIRCRAFT ACOUSTICAL
ENCLOSURE..................
QUANTICO MARINE CORPS COMBAT 5,270 20,820 +15,550
DEVELOPMENT COMMAND:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS.
YORKTOWN NAVAL WEAPONS 6,330 25,040 +18,710
STATION: TRESTLE
REPLACEMENT AND PIER
UPGRADE....................
AIR FORCE: LANGLEY AFB: 1,486 6,300 +4,814
DORMITORY......................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CHEATHAM ANNEX: FLEET 500 1,650 +1,150
HOSPITAL SUPPORT OFC
CONTAINER HOLDING YARD.....
DAM NECK: MISSION SUPPORT 2,273 4,700 +2,427
FACILITY...................
NORFOLK NAVAL AIR STATION: 1,150 4,050 +2,900
AIRCREW WATER SURVIVAL
TRAINING FACILITY..........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT .......... 13,500 +13,500
PICKETT: MULTIPURPOSE RANGE....
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA........... 63,569 243,480 +179,911
=======================================
WASHINGTON
ARMY: FORT LEWIS:
AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT..... 1,560 5,200 +3,640
PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING 1,850 6,200 +4,350
CENTER.....................
TANK TRAIL EROSION 2,000 12,000 +10,000
MITIGATION--YAKIMA (PHASE
V).........................
NAVY:
BANGOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS 1,600 6,300 +4,700
FACILITY: D5 MISSILE
SUPPORT FACILITY...........
PORT HADLOCK NAVAL ORDNANCE 870 3,440 +2,570
CENTER (PACIFIC): TOMAHAWK
MAGAZINE...................
PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD: 3,950 15,610 +11,660
DREDGING...................
AIR FORCE:
FAIRCHILD AFB:
FLIGHTLINE SUPPORT .......... 9,100 +9,100
FACILITY...............
SURVIVAL TRAINING 1,071 4,500 +3,429
LOGISTICS COMPLEX......
MCCHORD AFB: C-17 SQUADRON 1,858 7,900 +6,042
OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE UNIT...........
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FAIRCHILD AFB: ADD TO 1,500 12,400 +10,900
HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM........
FORT LEWIS: NORTH DENTAL 4,950 5,500 +550
CLINIC REPLACEMENT.........
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR 1,300 4,700 +3,400
STATION: AIRCREW WATER
SURVIVAL TRAINING FACILITY.
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: YAKIMA: 3,464 16,316 +12,852
MANEUVER AREA TRAINING
EQUIPMENT SITE (PHASE I).......
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FAIRCHILD .......... 9,800 +9,800
AFB: COMPOSITE SUPPORT COMPLEX.
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MCCHORD AFB: 864 3,300 +2,436
ADD/ALTER C-17 SQUADRON
OPERATIONS AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
UNIT FACILITY..................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON......... 26,837 122,266 +95,429
=======================================
WEST VIRGINIA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ELEANOR:
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX......... .......... 18,521 +18,521
READINESS CENTER............ .......... 9,583 +9,583
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA...... .......... 28,104 +28,104
=======================================
WISCONSIN
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: VOLK FIELD: 1,923 8,900 +6,977
REPLACE TROOP TRAINING QUARTERS
=======================================
CONUS CLASSIFIED
ARMY: CLASSIFIED LOCATIONS: 36,400 36,400 ..............
CLASSIFIED PROJECT.............
AIR FORCE:
CLASSIFIED LOCATION:
AIR CONTROL SQUADRON 1,200 5,100 +3,900
OPERATIONS COMPLEX.....
CLASSIFIED PROJECT...... 1,093 1,093 ..............
CLASSIFIED PROJECT...... 9,700 9,700 ..............
SPECIAL TACTICAL UNIT 244 977 +733
DETACHMENT FACILITY....
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONUS 48,637 53,270 +4,633
CLASSIFIED...........
=======================================
ASCENSION ISLAND
AIR FORCE: ASCENSION ISLAND 512 2,150 +1,638
AUXILIARY AIR FIELD: GPS
SATELLITE CONTROL STATION......
=======================================
BAHRAIN ISLAND
NAVY:
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT UNIT
(SOUTHWEST ASIA):
BACHELOR ENLISTED 6,230 24,550 +18,320
QUARTERS (SECURITY
FORCE).................
BACHELOR ENLISTED 5,840 23,770 +17,930
QUARTERS (TRANSIENT)...
OPERATIONS CONTROL 8,550 34,770 +26,220
CENTER.................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, BAHRAIN ISLAND. 20,620 83,090 +62,470
=======================================
DIEGO GARCIA
NAVY: DIEGO GARCIA NAVY SUPPORT 2,070 8,150 +6,080
FACILITY: AIRCRAFT INTERMEDIATE
MAINTENANCE FACILITY...........
=======================================
GERMANY
ARMY:
ANSBACH: WHOLE BARRACKS 3,150 21,000 +17,850
COMPLEX RENEWAL............
BAMBERG:
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 860 5,700 +4,840
RENEWAL................
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 1,400 9,300 +7,900
RENEWAL................
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX 1,230 8,200 +6,970
RENEWAL................
MANNHEIM: WHOLE BARRACKS 675 4,500 +3,825
COMPLEX RENEWAL............
DEFENSE-WIDE: RAMSTEIN AIR 2,550 7,100 +4,550
BASE: ADD/ALTER DENTAL
CLINIC.....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY............ 9,865 55,800 +45,935
=======================================
GREECE
NAVY: SOUDA BAY CRETE NAVAL 1,620 6,380 +4,760
SUPPORT ACTIVITY: OPERATIONAL
SUPPORT FACILITIES.............
=======================================
GUAM
AIR FORCE: ANDERSEN AFB: 2,097 8,900 +6,803
LANDFILL CLOSURE...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ANDERSEN AFB: ANDERSEN 10,026 44,170 +34,144
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL..........
DEF FUEL SUPPORT POINT GUAM: 2,600 24,300 +21,700
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM
ARMY RESERVE: BARRIGADA: USAR 1,116 17,546 +16,430
CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/AREA
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT ACTIVITY...
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM............... 15,839 94,916 +79,077
=======================================
ITALY
NAVY: NAPLES NAVAL SUPPORT 7,370 26,750 +19,380
ACTIVITY: OPERATIONAL SUPPORT
FACILITY.......................
AIR FORCE: AVIANO AB: RADAR 966 3,700 +2,734
APPROACH CONTROL FACILITY......
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY.............. 8,336 30,450 +22,114
=======================================
KOREA
ARMY:
CAMP CASEY: WHOLE BARRACKS 4,650 31,000 +26,350
COMPLEX RENEWAL............
CAMP HOWZE: WATER SYSTEM 920 3,050 +2,130
UPGRADE....................
CAMP STANLEY: ELECTRICAL 1,100 3,650 +2,550
SYSTEM UPGRADE.............
AIR FORCE:
OSAN AB:
ADD/ALTER PHYSICAL 2,229 7,600 +5,371
FITNESS CENTER.........
DORMITORY............... 3,482 12,000 +8,518
DEFENSE-WIDE YONGSAN:
ADD/ALTER HOSPITAL.......... 9,570 38,570 +29,000
MEDICAL SUPPLY/EQUIP STORAGE 2,300 2,550 +250
WAREHOUSE REPLACEMENT......
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA.............. 24,251 98,420 +74,169
=======================================
KWAJALEIN
ARMY: KWAJALEIN ATOLL: POWER 35,400 35,400 ..............
PLANT--ROI NAMUR ISLAND (PHASE
II)............................
=======================================
PORTUGAL
AIR FORCE: LAJES FIELD (AZORES): 479 1,800 +1,321
APRON SECURITY LIGHTING........
=======================================
PUERTO RICO
DEFENSE-WIDE: NSGA SABANA SECA: 1,120 4,000 +2,880
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC
REPLACEMENT....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
PUERTO RICO INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
C-130 ADD TO AIRCRAFT 490 2,250 +1,760
PARKING APRON..........
C-130 FUEL CELL AND 1,212 5,600 +4,388
CORROSION CONTROL
FACILITY...............
C-130 UPGRADE AIRCRAFT 825 3,800 +2,975
MAINTENANCE HANGAR.....
ARMY RESERVE: FORT BUCHANAN: 1,431 10,101 +8,670
USAR CENTER....................
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, PUERTO RICO........ 5,078 25,751 +20,673
=======================================
SPAIN
DEFENSE-WIDE:
MORON AIR BASE: REPLACE 4,100 15,200 +11,100
HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM........
ROTA NAVAL STATION: ROTA 3,854 17,020 +13,166
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL..........
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPAIN.............. 7,954 32,220 +24,266
=======================================
UNITED KINGDOM
AIR FORCE:
ROYAL AIR FORCE FELTWELL: 786 3,000 +2,214
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.
ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 1,519 5,800 +4,281
CONSOLIDATED SUPPORT 3,221 12,400 +9,179
COMPLEX................
ROYAL AIR FORCE MILDENHALL:
CONSOLIDATE CORROSION 2,693 10,200 +7,507
CONTROL/MAINTENANCE
COMPLEX................
OPERATIONS FACILITY..... 1,076 4,100 +3,024
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 267 1,000 +733
STORAGE FACILITY.......
KC-135 FLIGHT SIMULATOR 600 2,300 +1,700
FACILITY...............
ROYAL AIR FORCE MOLESWORTH: 445 1,700 +1,255
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ROYAL AIR FORCE FELTWELL: 1,023 4,570 +3,547
CONSTRUCT MULTIPURPOSE
FACILITY...................
LAKENHEATH MIDDLE SCHOOL: 841 3,770 +2,929
CONSTRUCT GYMNASIUM
BUILDING...................
MENWITH HILL STATION: 500 500 ..............
MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION...
ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH: 1,000 7,100 +6,100
ADD/ALTER DENTAL CLINIC....
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM..... 13,971 56,440 +42,469
=======================================
NATO
NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 191,000 100,000 -91,000
=======================================
WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED
ARMY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
HOST NATION SUPPORT..... 21,300 21,300 ..............
MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 9,500 15,000 +5,500
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 60,705 65,114 +4,409
GENERAL REDUCTION....... .......... .......... ..............
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION 30,689 .......... -30,689
AND OVERHEAD...........
FINANCING ENTRY......... -30,689 .......... +30,689
NAVY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE 65,630 66,581 +951
LOCATIONS: PLANNING AND
DESIGN.....................
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 7,342 8,862 +1,520
CONSTRUCTION...............
GENERAL REDUCTION....... .......... .......... ..............
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION 6,178 .......... -6,178
AND OVERHEAD...........
FINANCING ENTRY......... -6,178 .......... +6,178
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 8,741 14,126 +5,385
CONSTRUCTION...........
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 28,004 32,764 +4,760
GENERAL REDUCTION....... .......... .......... ..............
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION 3,376 .......... -3,376
AND OVERHEAD...........
FINANCING ENTRY......... -3,376 .......... +3,376
DEFENSE-WIDE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
ENERGY CONSERVATION 6,558 .......... -6,558
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM....
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION 938 938 ..............
GENERAL REDUCTION........... .......... .......... ..............
PLANNING AND DESIGN:
TRI-CARE MANAGEMENT 9,500 9,500 ..............
ACTIVITY...............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS 5,700 6,040 +340
COMMAND................
BALLISTIC MISSILE 124 15,124 +15,000
DEFENSE ORGANIZATION...
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES 18,000 3,000 -15,000
TRANSFER FROM RDT&E..... .......... .......... ..............
FORWARD OPERATING .......... 5,000 +5,000
LOCATIONS..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND 33,324 38,664 +5,340
DESIGN...............
=======================================
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 1,000 1,000 ..............
DEPENDENTS EDUCATION...
TRI-CARE MANAGEMENT 3,587 3,587 ..............
ACTIVITY...............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS 2,300 2,300 ..............
COMMAND................
DEFENSE FINANCE AND 1,500 1,500 ..............
ACCOUNTING SERVICE.....
BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,248 1,248 ..............
DEFENSE ORGANIZATION...
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES 2,900 2,900 ..............
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF... 6,083 6,083 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED 18,618 18,618 ..............
MINOR CONSTRUCTION...
=======================================
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 4,129 29,667 +25,538
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 771 20,771 +20,000
CONSTRUCTION...........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 4,951 17,871 +12,920
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 2,000 7,000 +5,000
CONSTRUCTION...........
ARMY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 8,500 9,968 +1,468
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 1,416 2,716 +1,300
CONSTRUCTION...........
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION 712 .......... -712
AND OVERHEAD...........
FINANCING ENTRY......... -712 .......... +712
NAVY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 1,778 1,778 ..............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 1,036 4,036 +3,000
CONSTRUCTION...........
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION 32 .......... -32
AND OVERHEAD...........
FINANCING ENTRY......... -32 .......... +32
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 1,867 1,867 ..............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 4,467 5,467 +1,000
CONSTRUCTION...........
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION 407 .......... -407
AND OVERHEAD...........
FINANCING ENTRY......... -407 .......... +407
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE 291,575 383,108 +91,533
UNSPECIFIED..........
=======================================
WORLDWIDE VARIOUS
DEFENSE-WIDE: VARIOUS LOCATIONS: 1,300 8,900 +7,600
POLLUTION ABATEMENT FACILITIES.
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY
KOREA: CAMP HUMPHREYS (60 UNITS) 4,400 24,000 +19,600
FINANCING ENTRY................. -286 .......... +286
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS....... 5,303 32,600 +27,297
FINANCING ENTRY................. -345 .......... +345
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 4,300 4,300 ..............
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND 631 .......... -631
OVERHEAD.......................
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 14,003 60,900 +46,897
=======================================
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.......... 92,453 92,453 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT............ 47,715 47,715 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........... 220,952 220,952 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT......... 44,970 44,970 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT....... 482 482 ..............
LEASING..................... 222,294 222,294 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 469,211 469,211 ..............
INTEREST PAYMENTS........... 3 3 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 1,098,080 1,098,080 ..............
MAINTENANCE..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,112,083 1,158,980 +46,897
ARMY.....................
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE
CORPS
ARIZONA: MARINE CORPS AIR .......... 17,000 +17,000
STATION (YUMA) (100 UNITS).....
HAWAII:
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION 5,320 26,615 +21,295
(KANEOHE BAY) (100 UNITS)..
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII .......... 22,639 +22,639
FAMILY HOUSING (84 UNITS)..
NAVAL COMPLEX (PEARL HARBOR) 6,031 30,168 +24,137
(133 UNITS)................
NAVAL COMPLEX (PEARL HARBOR) 3,831 19,167 +15,336
(96 UNITS).................
FINANCING ENTRY................. -908 .......... +908
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS....... 31,708 165,050 +133,342
FINANCING ENTRY................. -1,897 .......... +1,897
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 17,715 17,715 ..............
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND 2,805 .......... -2,805
OVERHEAD.......................
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 64,605 298,354 +233,749
=======================================
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.......... 82,925 82,925 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT............ 63,589 63,589 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........... 170,991 170,991 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT......... 32,636 32,636 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT....... 1,180 1,180 ..............
LEASING..................... 145,953 145,953 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 397,723 397,723 ..............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS. 73 73 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 895,070 895,070 ..............
MAINTENANCE..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 959,675 1,193,424 +233,749
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS....
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE
ARIZONA: DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB (64 2,707 10,000 +7,293
UNITS).........................
CALIFORNIA:
BEALE AFB (60 UNITS)........ 2,301 8,500 +6,199
EDWARDS AFB (98 UNITS)...... 4,404 16,270 +11,866
EDWARDS AFB (90 UNITS)...... 4,472 16,520 +12,048
VANDENBERG AFB (91 UNITS)... 4,548 16,800 +12,252
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: BOLLING 2,537 9,375 +6,838
AFB (72 UNITS).................
FLORIDA:
EGLIN AFB (130 UNITS)....... 3,812 14,080 +10,268
MACDILL AFB (54 UNITS)...... 2,446 9,034 +6,588
KANSAS: MCCONNELL AFB........... .......... 1,363 +1,363
MISSISSIPPI: COLUMBUS AFB (100 3,327 12,290 +8,963
UNITS).........................
MONTANA: MALMSTROM AFB (34 2,050 7,570 +5,520
UNITS).........................
NEBRASKA: OFFUTT AFB (72 UNITS). 3,343 12,352 +9,009
NORTH CAROLINA: SEYMOUR JOHNSON 3,300 12,187 +8,887
AFB (78 UNITS).................
NORTH DAKOTA:
GRAND FORKS AFB (42 UNITS).. 2,720 10,050 +7,330
MINOT AFB (72 UNITS)........ 2,912 10,756 +7,844
TEXAS: LACKLAND AFB (48 UNITS).. 2,030 7,500 +5,470
PORTUGAL: LAJES AFB (AZORES) (75 3,509 12,964 +9,455
UNITS).........................
FINANCING ENTRY................. -1,033 .......... +1,033
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS....... 34,280 129,952 +95,672
FINANCING ENTRY................. -128 .......... +128
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 17,093 17,471 +378
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND 1,161 .......... -1,161
OVERHEAD.......................
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 101,791 335,034 +233,243
=======================================
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.......... 56,413 56,413 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT............ 31,450 31,450 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........... 160,117 160,117 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT......... 36,997 36,997 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT....... 2,640 2,640 ..............
LEASING..................... 118,509 118,509 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 415,733 415,733 ..............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS. 33 33 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 821,892 821,892 ..............
MAINTENANCE..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR 923,683 1,156,926 +233,243
FORCE....................
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (NSA). 50 50 ..............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA).... 67 67 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA)...... 265 265 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA)..... 515 515 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA)... 132 132 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA). 50 50 ..............
LEASING (NSA)............... 13,374 13,374 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 244 244 ..............
(NSA)......................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA)... 3,401 3,401 ..............
LEASING (DIA)............... 22,265 22,265 ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA).... 247 247 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA)...... 75 75 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA)..... 414 414 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA)... 21 21 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 370 370 ..............
(DLA)......................
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 41,440 41,440 ..............
MAINTENANCE..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 41,490 41,490 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE.............
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING REVITALIZATION
FAMILY HOUSING REVITALIZATION... .......... 25,000 +25,000
=======================================
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY 78,756 25,000 -53,756
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND.......
=======================================
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART IV
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 705,911 705,911 ..............
ACCOUNT, PART IV...............
=======================================
GENERAL PROVISIONS
CONTINGENCY REDUCTION........... .......... -278,051 -278,051
=======================================
GRAND TOTAL............... 5,438,443 8,273,820 +2,835,377
------------------------------------------------------------------------