[House Report 106-298]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    106-298

======================================================================



 
                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

                 August 5, 1999.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______


 Mr. Shuster, from the committee of conference, submitted the following

                           CONFERENCE REPORT

                         [To accompany S. 507]

      The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses on the amendment of the House to the bill (S. 
507), to provide for the conservation and development of water 
and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army 
to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and 
harbors of the United States, and for other purposes, having 
met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend 
and do recommend to their respective Houses as follows:
      That the Senate recede from its disagreement to the 
amendment of the House to the text of the bill and agree to the 
same with an amendment as follows:
      In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the 
House amendment, insert the following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act 
is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
          environment.
Sec. 106. Small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Small flood control authority.
Sec. 202. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and disseminating 
          information on floods and flood damage.
Sec. 203. Contributions by States and political subdivisions.
Sec. 204. Sediment decontamination technology.
Sec. 205. Control of aquatic plants.
Sec. 206. Use of continuing contracts for construction of certain 
          projects.
Sec. 207. Water resources development studies for the Pacific region.
Sec. 208. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 209. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 210. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 211. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 212. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration program.
Sec. 213. Shore management program.
Sec. 214. Shore damage prevention or mitigation.
Sec. 215. Shore protection.
Sec. 216. Flood prevention coordination.
Sec. 217. Disposal of dredged material on beaches.
Sec. 218. Annual passes for recreation.
Sec. 219. Nonstructural flood control projects.
Sec. 220. Lakes program.
Sec. 221. Enhancement of fish and wildlife resources.
Sec. 222. Purchase of American-made equipment and products.
Sec. 223. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
          interests.
Sec. 224. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 225. Recreation user fees.
Sec. 226. Small storm damage reduction projects.
Sec. 227. Use of private enterprises.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway wildlife mitigation, Alabama and 
          Mississippi.
Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 303. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska.
Sec. 304. Loggy Bayou, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, 
          Oklahoma, and Texas.
Sec. 305. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 306. San Lorenzo River, California.
Sec. 307. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 308. Delaware River mainstem and channel deepening, Delaware, New 
          Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Sec. 309. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 310. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 311. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 312. Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida, periodic beach 
          nourishment.
Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida.
Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida.
Sec. 315. Miami Harbor channel, Florida.
Sec. 316. St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida.
Sec. 317. Milo Creek, Idaho.
Sec. 318. Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 319. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 320. Ogden Dunes, Indiana.
Sec. 321. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 322. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 323. Dubuque, Iowa.
Sec. 324. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
Sec. 326. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Louisiana.
Sec. 327. Twelve-Mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 328. West bank of the Mississippi River (east of Harvey Canal), 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 329. Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 331. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 332. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri.
Sec. 333. Meramec River basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri.
Sec. 334. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and 
          Nebraska.
Sec. 335. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska.
Sec. 336. Absecon Island, New Jersey.
Sec. 337. New York Harbor and adjacent channels, Port Jersey, New 
          Jersey.
Sec. 338. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 339. Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay channels, New York and New 
          Jersey.
Sec. 340. New York City watershed.
Sec. 341. New York State canal system.
Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York.
Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River basin, Oklahoma.
Sec. 344. Willamette River temperature control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
          Oregon.
Sec. 345. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 346. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Sec. 347. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 348. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 349. Nine Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 351. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 352. Fox Point hurricane barrier, Providence, Rhode Island.
Sec. 353. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.
Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas.
Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas.
Sec. 356. Dallas floodway extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah.
Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Sec. 359. Columbia River channel, Washington and Oregon.
Sec. 360. Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 361. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 362. Moorefield, West Virginia.
Sec. 363. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 364. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 365. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 366. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 367. Martin, Kentucky.
Sec. 368. Southern West Virginia pilot program.
Sec. 369. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Jackson, Alabama.
Sec. 370. Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada.
Sec. 371. Comite River, Louisiana.
Sec. 372. St. Marys River, Michigan.
Sec. 373. Charlevoix, Michigan.
Sec. 374. White River basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 375. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, water conveyance facilities.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Deep draft harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 402. Boydsville, Arkansas.
Sec. 403. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 404. Del Norte County, California.
Sec. 405. Frazier Creek, Tulare County, California.
Sec. 406. Mare Island Strait, California.
Sec. 407. Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California.
Sec. 408. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
Sec. 409. Whitewater River basin, California.
Sec. 410. Destin-Noriega Point, Florida.
Sec. 411. Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.
Sec. 412. Port Everglades, Broward County, Florida.
Sec. 413. Lake Allatoona, Etowah River, and Little River watershed, 
          Georgia.
Sec. 414. Boise, Idaho.
Sec. 415. Goose Creek watershed, Oakley, Idaho.
Sec. 416. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 417. Snake River, Lewiston, Idaho.
Sec. 418. Snake River and Payette River, Idaho.
Sec. 419. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
          Wisconsin.
Sec. 420. Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.
Sec. 421. Coastal Louisiana.
Sec. 422. Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana.
Sec. 423. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ecosystem, Chef Menteur to Sabine 
          River, Louisiana.
Sec. 424. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 425. Westport, Massachusetts.
Sec. 426. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 427. St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
Sec. 428. Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio.
Sec. 429. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.
Sec. 430. Tunica Lake weir, Mississippi.
Sec. 431. Yellowstone River, Montana.
Sec. 432. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
Sec. 433. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 434. Cayuga Creek, New York.
Sec. 435. Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont.
Sec. 436. Oswego River basin, New York.
Sec. 437. White Oak River, North Carolina.
Sec. 438. Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.
Sec. 439. Cleveland harbor, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sec. 440. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 441. Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.
Sec. 442. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 443. South Carolina coastal areas.
Sec. 444. Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina.
Sec. 445. Waccamaw River, South Carolina.
Sec. 446. Day County, South Dakota.
Sec. 447. Niobrara River and Missouri River, South Dakota.
Sec. 448. Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 449. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.
Sec. 450. Mouth of Colorado River, Texas.
Sec. 451. Santa Clara River, Utah.
Sec. 452. Mount St. Helens, Washington.
Sec. 453. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia.
Sec. 454. West Virginia ports.
Sec. 455. John Glenn Great Lakes basin program.
Sec. 456. Great Lakes navigational system.
Sec. 457. Nutrient loading resulting from dredged material disposal.
Sec. 458. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers levees and streambanks 
          protection.
Sec. 459. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 460. Susquehanna River and Upper Chesapeake Bay.

                    TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Corps assumption of NRCS projects.
Sec. 502. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 503. Contaminated sediment dredging technology.
Sec. 504. Dam safety.
Sec. 505. Great Lakes remedial action plans.
Sec. 506. Projects for improvement of the environment.
Sec. 507. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 508. Measurements of Lake Michigan diversions, Illinois.
Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 511. Water control management.
Sec. 512. Beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 513. Design and construction assistance.
Sec. 514. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 515. Irrigation diversion protection and fisheries enhancement 
          assistance.
Sec. 516. Innovative technologies for watershed restoration.
Sec. 517. Expedited consideration of certain projects.
Sec. 518. Dog River, Alabama.
Sec. 519. Levees in Elba and Geneva, Alabama.
Sec. 520. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.
Sec. 521. Beaver Lake, Arkansas, water supply storage reallocation.
Sec. 522. Beaver Lake trout production facility, Arkansas.
Sec. 523. Chino dairy preserve, California.
Sec. 524. Orange and San Diego Counties, California.
Sec. 525. Rush Creek, Novato, California.
Sec. 526. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 527. Lower St. Johns River Basin, Florida.
Sec. 528. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
Sec. 529. Comprehensive flood impact response modeling system, 
          Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
Sec. 530. Additional construction assistance in Illinois.
Sec. 531. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
Sec. 532. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 534. Snug Harbor, Maryland.
Sec. 535. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
          Maryland.
Sec. 536. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.
Sec. 537. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 538. Beaver branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
Sec. 539. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels, New York.
Sec. 540. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 541. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York.
Sec. 542. Woodlawn, New York.
Sec. 543. Floodplain mapping, New York.
Sec. 544. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.
Sec. 545. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
Sec. 546. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 547. Willamette River Basin, Oregon.
Sec. 548. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 549. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 550. Point Marion Lock and Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 551. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 553. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, watershed 
          management and restoration study.
Sec. 554. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 555. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, study.
Sec. 556. North Padre Island storm damage reduction and environmental 
          restoration project.
Sec. 557. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 558. Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 559. Coastal aquatic habitat management.
Sec. 560. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 561. Beneficial use of waste tire rubber.
Sec. 562. Site designation.
Sec. 563. Land conveyances.
Sec. 564. McNary Pool, Washington.
Sec. 565. Namings.
Sec. 566. Folsom Dam and Reservoir additional storage and additional 
          flood control studies.
Sec. 567. Wallops Island, Virginia.
Sec. 568. Detroit River, Michigan.
Sec. 569. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 570. Alaska.
Sec. 571. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 572. Sacramento Metropolitan Area watershed restoration, 
          California.
Sec. 573. Onondaga Lake, New York.
Sec. 574. East Lynn Lake, West Virginia.
Sec. 575. Eel River, California.
Sec. 576. North Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sec. 577. Upper Mississippi River, Mississippi Place, St. Paul, 
          Minnesota.
Sec. 578. Dredging of salt ponds in the State of Rhode Island.
Sec. 579. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 580. Cumberland, Maryland, flood project mitigation.
Sec. 581. City of Miami Beach, Florida.
Sec. 582. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake Rivers 
          salmon survival.
Sec. 583. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
Sec. 584. Holes Creek flood control project, Ohio.
Sec. 585. San Jacinto disposal area, Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 586. Water monitoring station.
Sec. 587. Overflow management facility, Rhode Island.
Sec. 588. Lower Chena River, Alaska.
Sec. 589. Numana Dam Fish passage, Nevada.
Sec. 590. Embrey Dam, Virginia.
Sec. 591. Environmental remediation, Front Royal, Virginia.
Sec. 592. Mississippi.
Sec. 593. Central New Mexico.
Sec. 594. Ohio.
Sec. 595. Rural Nevada and Montana.
Sec. 596. Phoenix, Arizona.
Sec. 597. National Harbor, Maryland.

TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND STATE 
        OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

Sec. 601. Definitions.
Sec. 602. Terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration.
Sec. 603. South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
          Fund.
Sec. 604. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
          Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.
Sec. 605. Transfer of Federal land to State of South Dakota.
Sec. 606. Transfer of Corps of Engineers land for Indian tribes.
Sec. 607. Administration.
Sec. 608. Study.
Sec. 609. Authorization of appropriations.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects 
for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports designated in 
this subsection:
            (1) Nome harbor improvements, alaska.--The project 
        for navigation, Nome Harbor improvements, Alaska: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1999, as 
        amended by the Chief of Engineers on August 2, 1999, at 
        a total cost of $25,651,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $20,192,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $5,459,000.
            (2) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for 
        navigation, Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $11,760,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $6,964,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $4,796,000.
            (3) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for 
        navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated June 8, 1999, at a total cost of 
        $12,240,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $4,089,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $8,151,000.
            (4) Rio salado (salt river), phoenix and tempe, 
        arizona.--The project for flood control and 
        environmental restoration, Rio Salado (Salt River), 
        Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated August 20, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $88,048,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $56,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $31,693,000.
            (5) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, and 
        recreation, Tucson drainage area, Arizona: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated May 20, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $29,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $16,768,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $13,132,000.
            (6) American and sacramento rivers, california.--
                    (A) In general.--The Folsom Dam 
                Modification portion of the Folsom Modification 
                Plan described in the United States Army Corps 
                of Engineers Supplemental Information Report 
                for the American River Watershed Project, 
                California, dated March 1996, as modified by 
                the report entitled ``Folsom Dam Modification 
                Report, New Outlets Plan,'' dated March 1998, 
                prepared by the Sacramento Area Flood Control 
                Agency, at an estimated cost of $150,000,000, 
                with an estimated Federal cost of $97,500,000 
                and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $52,500,000. The Secretary shall coordinate 
                with the Secretary of the Interior with respect 
                to the design and construction of modifications 
                at Folsom Dam authorized by this paragraph.
                    (B) Reoperation measures.--Upon completion 
                of the improvements to Folsom Dam authorized by 
                subparagraph (A), the variable space allocated 
                to flood control within the Reservoir shall be 
                reduced from the current operating range of 
                400,000-670,000 acre-feet to 400,000-600,000 
                acre-feet.
                    (C) Makeup of water shortages caused by 
                flood control operation.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior shall enter into, or modify, such 
                agreements with the Sacramento Area Flood 
                Control Agency regarding the operation of 
                Folsom Dam and reservoir as may be necessary in 
                order that, notwithstanding any prior agreement 
                or provision of law, 100 percent of the water 
                needed to make up for any water shortage caused 
                by variable flood control operation during any 
                year at Folsom Dam and resulting in a 
                significant impact on recreation at Folsom 
                Reservoir shall be replaced, to the extent the 
                water is available for purchase, by the 
                Secretary of the Interior.
                    (D) Significant impact on recreation.--For 
                the purposes of this paragraph, a significant 
                impact on recreation is defined as any impact 
                that results in a lake elevation at Folsom 
                Reservoir below 435 feet above sea level 
                starting on May 15 and ending on September 15 
                of any given year.
                    (E) Updated flood management plan.--The 
                Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of 
                the Interior, shall update the flood management 
                plan for Folsom Dam authorized by section 
                9159(f)(2) of the Department of Defense 
                Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1946), to 
                reflect the operational capabilities created by 
                the modification authorized by subparagraph (A) 
                and improved weather forecasts based on the 
                Advanced Hydrologic Prediction System of the 
                National Weather Service.
            (7) Oakland harbor, california.--The project for 
        navigation, Oakland Harbor, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total 
        cost of $252,290,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $128,081,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $124,209,000.
            (8) South sacramento county streams, california.--
        The project for flood control, environmental 
        restoration and recreation, South Sacramento County 
        streams, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $65,500,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $41,200,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $24,300,000.
            (9) Upper guadalupe river, california.--
        Construction of the locally preferred plan for flood 
        damage reduction and recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, 
        California, described as the Bypass Channel Plan of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated August 19, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $140,328,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $96,328,000.
            (10) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 25, 
        1998, at a total cost of $26,600,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $17,350,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $9,250,000.
            (11) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new 
        jersey-broadkill beach, delaware.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay 
        coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Broadkill Beach, 
        Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 
        17, 1998, at a total cost of $9,049,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $5,674,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,375,000, and at an estimated 
        average annual cost of $538,200 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated annual Federal cost of $349,800 and an 
        estimated annual non-Federal cost of $188,400.
            (12) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new 
        jersey-port mahon, delaware.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New 
        Jersey-Port Mahon, Delaware: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated September 28, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $7,644,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $4,969,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $2,675,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
        $234,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
        of $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $82,000.
            (13) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new 
        jersey-roosevelt inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--The 
        project for navigation mitigation and hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, 
        Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, 
        Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        February 3, 1999, at a total cost of $3,393,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $2,620,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $773,000, and at an 
        estimated average annual cost of $196,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated annual Federal cost of $152,000 and an 
        estimated annual non-Federal cost of $44,000.
            (14) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new 
        jersey-villas and vicinity, new jersey.--The project 
        for shore protection and ecosystem restoration, 
        Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Villas 
        and vicinity, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of 
        $7,520,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $4,888,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $2,632,000.
            (15) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick 
        island, bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--
        The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Delaware Coast from Cape Henelopen to Fenwick Island, 
        Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, Delaware: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total 
        cost of $22,205,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $7,772,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
        $1,584,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
        life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal 
        cost of $1,030,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal 
        cost of $554,000.
            (16) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer, florida.--
        The project for aquifer storage and recovery described 
        in the Corps of Engineers Central and Southern Florida 
        Water Supply Study, Florida, dated April 1989, and in 
        House Document 369, dated July 30, 1968, at a total 
        cost of $27,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $13,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $13,500,000.
            (17) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--The project for 
        navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total 
        cost of $26,116,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $9,129,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $16,987,000.
            (18) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The 
        project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, 
        Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 
        13, 1998, at a total cost of $12,356,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $6,235,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $6,121,000.
            (19) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for 
        navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $50,717,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $32,966,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $17,751,000.
            (20) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for 
        flood control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost 
        of $11,171,300, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $7,261,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,909,800.
            (21) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana, east 
        baton rouge parish watershed.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction and recreation, Amite River and 
        Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish 
        Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 23, 1996, at a total cost of $112,900,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $39,500,000.
            (22) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels, 
        maryland and virginia.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for 
                navigation, Baltimore Harbor Anchorages and 
                Channels, Maryland and Virginia, Report of the 
                Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1998, at a 
                total cost of $28,426,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $18,994,000 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $9,432,000.
                    (B) Credit or reimbursement.--If a project 
                cooperation agreement is entered into, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit toward, 
                or reimbursement of, the Federal share of 
                project costs for construction work performed 
                by the non-Federal interest before execution of 
                the project cooperation agreement if the 
                Secretary finds the work to be integral to the 
                project.
                    (C) Study of modifications.--During the 
                preconstruction engineering and design phase of 
                the project, the Secretary shall conduct a 
                study to determine the feasibility of 
                undertaking further modifications to the 
                Dundalk Marine Terminal access channels, 
                consisting of--
                            (i) deepening and widening the 
                        Dundalk access channels to a depth of 
                        50 feet and a width of 500 feet;
                            (ii) widening the flares of the 
                        access channels; and
                            (iii) providing a new flare on the 
                        west side of the entrance to the east 
                        access channel.
                    (D) Report.--
                            (i) In general.--Not later than 
                        March 1, 2000, the Secretary shall 
                        submit to Congress a report on the 
                        study under subparagraph (C).
                            (ii) Contents.--The report shall 
                        include a determination of--
                                    (I) the feasibility of 
                                performing the project 
                                modifications described in 
                                subparagraph (C); and
                                    (II) the appropriateness of 
                                crediting or reimbursing the 
                                Federal share of the cost of 
                                the work performed by the non-
                                Federal interest on the project 
                                modifications.
            (23) Red lake river at crookston, minnesota.--The 
        project for flood control, Red Lake River at Crookston, 
        Minnesota: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 
        20, 1998, at a total cost of $8,950,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $5,720,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,230,000.
            (24) Turkey creek basin, kansas city, missouri, and 
        kansas city, kansas.--The project for flood damage 
        reduction, Turkey Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, 
        and Kansas City, Kansas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of 
        $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $17,279,000.
            (25) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new 
        jersey.--The project for navigation mitigation, 
        ecosystem restoration, shore protection, and hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape May Meadows, 
        Cape May Point, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 5, 1999, at a total cost of 
        $15,952,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $12,118,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,834,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
        $1,114,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
        life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal 
        cost of $897,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal 
        cost of $217,000.
            (26) Townsends inlet to cape may inlet, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction, shore protection, and ecosystem restoration, 
        Townsends Inlet to Cape May Inlet, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 1998, at 
        a total cost of $56,503,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $36,727,000 and at an estimated non-Federal 
        cost of $19,776,000, and at an estimated average annual 
        cost of $2,000,000 for periodic nourishment over the 
        50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual 
        Federal cost of $1,300,000 and an estimated annual non-
        Federal cost of $700,000.
            (27) Guanajibo river, puerto rico.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for flood 
                control, Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico: Report 
                of the Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 
                1996, at a total cost of $27,031,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $20,273,250 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $6,757,750.
                    (B) Cost sharing.--Cost sharing for the 
                project shall be determined in accordance with 
                section 103(a) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as 
                in effect on October 11, 1996.
            (28) Rio grande de manati, barceloneta, puerto 
        rico.--The project for flood control, Rio Grande De 
        Manati, Barceloneta, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated January 22, 1999, at a total cost of 
        $13,491,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $8,785,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $4,706,000.
            (29) Rio nigua, salinas, puerto rico.--The project 
        for flood control, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1997, 
        at a total cost of $13,702,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $7,645,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
        cost of $6,057,000.
            (30) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for 
        flood control, environmental restoration, and 
        recreation, Salt Creek, Graham, Texas: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $10,080,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $6,560,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,520,000.
    (b) Projects Subject to a Final Report.--The following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and 
other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
subject to the conditions, recommended in a final report of 
theChief of Engineers if a favorable report of the Chief is completed 
not later than December 31, 1999:
            (1) Heritage harbor, wrangell, alaska.--The project 
        for navigation, Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska, at a 
        total cost of $24,556,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $14,447,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $10,109,000.
            (2) Arroyo pasajero, california.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Arroyo Pasajero, California, at 
        a total cost of $260,700,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $170,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $90,600,000.
            (3) Hamilton airfield, california.--The project for 
        environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, 
        California, at a total cost of $55,200,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $41,400,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $13,800,000.
            (4) Success dam, tule river basin, california.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction and water supply, 
        Success Dam, Tule River basin, California, at a total 
        cost of $17,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,635,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,265,000.
            (5) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new 
        jersey: oakwood beach, new jersey.--The project for 
        shore protection, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and 
        New Jersey: Oakwood Beach, New Jersey, at a total cost 
        of $3,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $2,184,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,176,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
        $81,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
        of $53,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $28,000.
            (6) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new 
        jersey: reeds beach and pierces point, new jersey.--The 
        project for shore protection and ecosystem restoration, 
        Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: Reeds 
        Beach and Pierces Point, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
        $4,057,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,420,000.
            (7) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--
        The project for hurricane and storm damage prevention 
        and shore protection, Little Talbot Island, Duval 
        County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,915,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $3,839,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $2,076,000.
            (8) Ponce de leon inlet, florida.--The project for 
        navigation and related purposes, Ponce de Leon Inlet, 
        Volusia County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,454,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $2,466,000.
            (9) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph 
                (B), the project for navigation, Savannah 
                Harbor expansion, Georgia, including 
                implementation of the mitigation plan, with 
                such modifications as the Secretary considers 
                appropriate, at a total cost of $230,174,000 
                (of which amount a portion is authorized for 
                implementation of the mitigation plan), with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $145,160,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $85,014,000.
                    (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by 
                subparagraph (A) may be carried out only 
                after--
                            (i) the Secretary, in consultation 
                        with affected Federal, State of 
                        Georgia, State of South Carolina, 
                        regional, and local entities, reviews 
                        and approves an environmental impact 
                        statement for the project that 
                        includes--
                                    (I) an analysis of the 
                                impacts of project depth 
                                alternatives ranging from 42 
                                feet through 48 feet; and
                                    (II) a selected plan for 
                                navigation and an associated 
                                mitigation plan as required 
                                under section 906(a) of the 
                                Water Resources Development Act 
                                of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)); 
                                and
                            (ii) the Secretary of the Interior, 
                        the Secretary of Commerce, the 
                        Administrator of the Environmental 
                        Protection Agency, and the Secretary 
                        approve the selected plan and determine 
                        that the associated mitigation plan 
                        adequately addresses the potential 
                        environmental impacts of the project.
                    (C) Mitigation requirements.--The 
                mitigation plan shall be implemented before or 
                concurrently with construction of the project.
            (10) Des plaines river, illinois.--The project for 
        flood control, Des Plaines River, Illinois, at a total 
        cost of $48,800,000 with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $31,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $17,100,000.
            (11) Reelfoot lake, kentucky and tennessee.--The 
        project for ecosystem restoration, Reelfoot Lake, 
        Kentucky and Tennessee, at a total cost of $35,287,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $23,601,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $11,686,000.
            (12) Brigantine inlet to great egg harbor, 
        brigantine island, new jersey.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction and shore 
        protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor, 
        Brigantine Island, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
        $4,970,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $3,230,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,740,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
        $465,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
        of $302,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $163,000.
            (13) Columbia river channel, oregon and 
        washington.--The project for navigation, Columbia River 
        Channel, Oregon and Washington, at a total cost of 
        $183,623,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $106,132,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $77,491,000.
            (14) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, 
        and recreation, Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas, at a 
        total cost of $20,300,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $8,300,000.
            (15) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project 
        for water supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard 
        Hanson Dam, Washington, at a total cost of $75,600,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $36,900,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $38,700,000.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (1) Eyak river, cordova, alaska.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska.
            (2) Salcha river and piledriver slough, fairbanks, 
        alaska.--Project for flood damage reduction to protect 
        against surface water flooding, lower Salcha River and 
        Piledriver Slough from its headwaters at the mouth of 
        the Salcha River to the Chena Lakes Flood Control 
        Project, Fairbanks, Alaska.
            (3) Lancaster, california.--Project for flood 
        control, Lancaster, California, westside stormwater 
        retention facility.
            (4) Magpie creek, california.--Project for flood 
        control, Magpie Creek, California, located within the 
        boundaries of McClellan Air Force Base.
            (5) Gateway triangle area, florida.--Project for 
        flood control, Gateway Triangle area, Collier County, 
        Florida.
            (6) Plant city, florida.--Project for flood 
        control, Plant City, Florida.
            (7) Stone island, lake monroe, florida.--Project 
        for flood control, Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida.
            (8) Ohio river, illinois.--Project for flood 
        control, Ohio River, Illinois.
            (9) Hamilton dam, michigan.--Project for flood 
        control, Hamilton Dam, Michigan.
            (10) Repaupo creek and delaware river, gloucester 
        county, new jersey.--Project for tidegate and levee 
        improvements for Repaupo Creek and the Delaware River, 
        Gloucester County, New Jersey.
            (11) Irondequoit creek, new york.--Project for 
        flood control, Irondequoit Creek watershed, New York.
            (12) Owasco lake seawall, new york.--Project for 
        flood control, Owasco Lake seawall, New York.
            (13) Port clinton, ohio.--Project for flood 
        control, Port Clinton, Ohio.
            (14) Abington township, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        flood control, Baeder and Wanamaker Roads, Abington 
        Township, Pennsylvania.
            (15) Port indian, west norriton township, 
        montgomery county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Port Indian, West Norriton Township, 
        Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
            (16) Port providence, upper providence township, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port 
        Providence, Upper Providence Township, Pennsylvania.
            (17) Springfield township, montgomery county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Springfield 
        Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
            (18) Tawney run creek, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        flood control, Tawney Run Creek, Allegheny County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (19) Wissahickon watershed, pennsylvania.--Project 
        for flood control, Wissahickon watershed, Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (20) Tioga county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Tioga River and Cowanesque River and their 
        tributaries, Tioga County, Pennsylvania.
            (21) First creek, knoxville, tennessee.--Project 
        for flood control, First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee.
            (22) Metro center levee, cumberland river, 
        nashville, tennessee.--Project for flood control, Metro 
        Center Levee, Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
    (b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.--
            (1) Maximum federal expenditure.--The maximum 
        amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
        project for flood control, Festus and Crystal City, 
        Missouri, is $10,000,000.
            (2) Revision of project cooperation agreement.--The 
        Secretary shall revise the project cooperation 
        agreement for the project described in paragraph (1) to 
        take into account the change in the Federal 
        participation in the project under paragraph (1).

SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under 
section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Arctic ocean, barrow, alaska.--Project for 
        storm damage reduction and coastal erosion, Barrow, 
        Alaska.
            (2) Saint joseph river, indiana.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Saint Joseph River, 
        Indiana.
            (3) Saginaw river, bay city, michigan.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Saginaw River, Bay City, 
        Michigan.
            (4) Big timber creek, new jersey.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Big Timber Creek, New 
        Jersey.
            (5) Lake shore road, athol springs, new york.--
        Project for streambank erosion control, Lake Shore 
        Road, Athol Springs, New York.
            (6) Marist college, poughkeepsie, new york.--
        Project for streambank erosion control, Marist College, 
        Poughkeepsie, New York.
            (7) Monroe county, ohio.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Monroe County, Ohio.
            (8) Green valley, west virginia.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Green Valley, West 
        Virginia.
    (b) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana.--The streambank 
protection project at Coulson Park, along the Yellowstone 
River, Billings, Montana, shall be eligible for assistance 
under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
701r).

SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).
            (1) Grand marais, arkansas.--Project for 
        navigation, Grand Marais, Arkansas.
            (2) Fields landing channel, humboldt harbor, 
        california.--Project for navigation, Fields Landing 
        Channel, Humboldt Harbor, California.
            (3) San mateo (pillar point harbor), california.--
        Project for navigation, San Mateo (Pillar Point 
        Harbor), California.
            (4) Agana marina, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Agana Marina, Guam.
            (5) Agat marina, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Agat Marina, Guam.
            (6) Apra harbor fuel piers, guam.--Project for 
        navigation, Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.
            (7) Apra harbor pier f-6, guam.--Project for 
        navigation, Apra Harbor Pier F-6, Guam.
            (8) Apra harbor seawall, guam.--Project for 
        navigation including a seawall, Apra Harbor, Guam.
            (9) Guam harbor, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Guam Harbor, Guam.
            (10) Illinois river near chautauqua park, 
        illinois.--Project for navigation, Illinois River near 
        Chautauqua Park, Illinois.
            (11) Whiting shoreline waterfront, whiting, 
        indiana.--Project for navigation, Whiting shoreline 
        waterfront, Whiting, Indiana.
            (12) Union river, ellsworth, maine.--Project for 
        navigation, Union River, Ellsworth, Maine.
            (13) Naraguagus river, machias, maine.--Project for 
        navigation, Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine.
            (14) Detroit river, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Detroit River, Michigan, including dredging 
        and removal of a reef.
            (15) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--
        Project for navigation, Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, 
        New Jersey.
            (16) Braddock bay, greece, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Braddock Bay, Greece, New York.
            (17) Buffalo and lasalle park, new york.--Project 
        for navigation, Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York.
            (18) Sturgeon point, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Sturgeon Point, New York.
            (19) Fairport harbor, ohio.--Project for 
        navigation, Fairport Harbor, Ohio, including a 
        recreation channel.

SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                    ENVIRONMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is appropriate, may carry out the project under 
section 1135(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2309a(a):
            (1) Illinois river in the vicinity of havana, 
        illinois.--Project for improvement of the quality of 
        the environment, Illinois River in the vicinity of 
        Havana, Illinois.
            (2) Knitting mill creek, virginia.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Knitting 
        Mill Creek, Virginia.
    (b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California.--Under 
authority of section 1135(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)), the Secretary shall carry out 
a project to construct a turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings 
River, California, in accordance with the project modification 
report and environmental assessment dated September 1996.

SEC. 106. SMALL AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the following 
projects under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Contra costa county, bay delta, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Contra Costa 
        County, Bay Delta, California.
            (2) Indian river, florida.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration and lagoon restoration, Indian 
        River, Florida.
            (3) Little wekiva river, florida.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration and erosion control, 
        Little Wekiva River, Florida.
            (4) Cook county, illinois.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration and lagoon restoration and 
        protection, Cook County, Illinois.
            (5) Grand batture island, mississippi.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grand Batture Island, 
        Mississippi.
            (6) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, 
        mississippi.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration 
        and reef restoration along the Gulf Coast, Hancock, 
        Harrison, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
            (7) Mississippi river and river des peres, st. 
        louis, missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and recreation, Mississippi River and River 
        Des Peres, St. Louis, Missouri.
            (8) Hudson river, new york.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Hudson River, New York.
            (9) Oneida lake, new york.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New 
        York.
            (10) Otsego lake, new york.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New 
        York.
            (11) North fork of yellow creek, ohio.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, North Fork of Yellow 
        Creek, Ohio.
            (12) Wheeling creek watershed, ohio.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wheeling Creek 
        watershed, Ohio.
            (13) Springfield millrace, oregon.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Springfield Millrace, 
        Oregon.
            (14) Upper amazon creek, oregon.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Upper Amazon Creek, 
        Oregon.
            (15) Lake ontelaunee reservoir, berks county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and distilling pond facilities, Lake 
        Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks County, Pennsylvania.
            (16) Blackstone river basin, rhode island and 
        massachusetts.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and fish passage facilities, Blackstone 
        River Basin, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking 
        ``construction of small projects'' and inserting 
        ``implementation of small structural and nonstructural 
        projects''; and
            (2) in the third sentence, by striking 
        ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$7,000,000''.

SEC. 202. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND DISSEMINATING 
                    INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD DAMAGE.

    Section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
709a(b)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting before 
the period at the end the following: ``, but the Secretary of 
the Army may accept funds voluntarily contributed by such 
entities for the purpose of expanding the scope of the services 
requested by the entities''.

SEC. 203. CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

    Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), is 
amended by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after 
``flood control''.

SEC. 204. SEDIMENT DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(33 U.S.C. 2239 note; Public Law 102-580) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 
        following:
            ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies 
        selected for demonstration at the pilot scale shall be 
        intended to result in practical end-use products.
            ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary 
        shall assist the project to ensure expeditious 
        completion by providing sufficient quantities of 
        contaminated dredged material to conduct the full-scale 
        demonstrations to stated capacity.'';
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking the first 
        sentence and inserting the following: ``There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
        $22,000,000 to complete technology testing, technology 
        commercialization, and the development of full scale 
        processing facilities within the New York/New Jersey 
        Harbor.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Support.--In carrying out the program under this 
section, the Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, 
cooperative agreements, and grants with colleges and 
universities and other non-Federal entities.''.

SEC. 205. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS.

    Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
610) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by 
        striking ``water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian 
        water milfoil, melaleuca, and other obnoxious aquatic 
        plant growths, from'' and inserting ``noxious aquatic 
        plant growths from'';
            (2) in the first sentence of subsection (b), by 
        striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000,000.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Support.--In carrying out the program under this 
section, the Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, 
cooperative agreements, and grants with colleges and 
universities and other non-Federal entities.''.

SEC. 206. USE OF CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN 
                    PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary shall not implement a fully allocated 
funding policy with respect to a water resource project if 
initiation of construction has occurred but sufficient funds 
are not available to complete the project.
    (b) Continuing Contracts.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
continuing contract for a project described in subsection (a).
    (c) Initiation of Construction Clarified.--For the purposes 
of this section, initiation of construction for a project 
occurs on the date of enactmentof an Act that appropriates 
funds for the project from 1 of the following appropriation accounts:
            (1) Construction, General.
            (2) Operation and Maintenance, General.
            (3) Flood Control, Mississippi River and 
        Tributaries.

SEC. 207. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC REGION.

    Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of 
navigation'' and inserting ``interests of water resources 
development including navigation, flood damage reduction, and 
environmental restoration''.

SEC. 208. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) Extension of Program.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) (110 Stat. 3769), by 
        striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(i) (110 Stat. 3769), by 
        striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''.
    (b) Credit and Reimbursement of Past and Future 
Activities.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3768) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Credit and reimbursement of past and 
                future activities.--The Secretary may provide 
                credit to or reimburse the non-Federal project 
                sponsor (using funds authorized by subparagraph 
                (C)) for the reasonable costs of any work that 
                has been performed or will be performed in 
                connection with a study or activity meeting the 
                requirements of subparagraph (A) if--
                            ``(i) the Secretary determines 
                        that--
                                    ``(I) the work performed by 
                                the non-Federal project sponsor 
                                will substantially expedite 
                                completion of a critical 
                                restoration project; and
                                    ``(II) the work is 
                                necessary for a critical 
                                restoration project; and
                            ``(ii) the credit or reimbursement 
                        is granted pursuant to a project-
                        specific agreement that prescribes the 
                        terms and conditions of the credit or 
                        reimbursement.''.
    (c) Caloosahatchee River Basin, Florida.--Section 528(e)(4) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) 
is amended in the first sentence by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ``if the Secretary determines that 
the acquisition is compatible with and an integral component of 
the Everglades and South Florida ecosystem restoration, 
including potential acquisition of land or interests in land in 
the Caloosahatchee River basin or other areas''.
    (d) In-Kind Work.--Section 528(e)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Regardless'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Land acquisition.--Regardless''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) In-kind work.--
                    ``(A) In general.--During the 
                preconstruction, engineering, and design phase 
                and the construction phase of the Central and 
                Southern Florida Project, the Secretary shall 
                allow credit against the non-Federal share of 
                the cost of activities described in subsection 
                (b) for work performed by non-Federal interests 
                at the request of the Secretary in furtherance 
                of the design of features included in the 
                comprehensive plan under that subsection.
                    ``(B) Audits.--In-kind work to be credited 
                under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to 
                audit.''.

SEC. 209. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``cooperative 
        agreement in accordance with the requirements of 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970'' and 
        inserting ``binding agreement with the Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any 
project carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest 
may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of the 
affected local government.''.

SEC. 210. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2330) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Form.--Before October 1, 2003, the Federal 
        share of the cost of a project under this section may 
        be provided in the form of reimbursements of project 
        costs.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``Construction'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Construction''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 
        221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), for any project carried out under this section, a 
        non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity, 
        with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 211. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Section 503 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3756) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (10) and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(10) Regional Atlanta watershed, Atlanta, 
        Georgia, and Lake Lanier, Forsyth and Hall Counties, 
        Georgia.''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(14) Clear Lake watershed, California.
            ``(15) Fresno Slough watershed, California.
            ``(16) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay 
        watershed, California.
            ``(17) Kaweah River watershed, California.
            ``(18) Lake Tahoe watershed, California and Nevada.
            ``(19) Malibu Creek watershed, California.
            ``(20) Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
            ``(21) Illinois River watershed, Illinois.
            ``(22) Truckee River basin, Nevada.
            ``(23) Walker River basin, Nevada.
            ``(24) Bronx River watershed, New York.
            ``(25) Catawba River watershed, North Carolina.
            ``(26) Columbia Slough watershed, Oregon.
            ``(27) Cabin Creek basin, West Virginia.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection 
        (f); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the 
        following:
    ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) 
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
any project undertaken under this section, a non-Federal 
interest may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
the affected local government.''.

SEC. 212. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake a program for 
the purpose of conducting projects to reduce flood hazards and 
restore the natural functions and values of rivers throughout 
the United States.
    (b) Studies and Projects.--
            (1) Authority.--In carrying out the program, the 
        Secretary may conduct studies to identify appropriate 
        flood damage reduction, conservation, and restoration 
        measures and may design and implement projects 
        described in subsection (a).
            (2) Consultation and coordination.--The studies and 
        projects carried out under this section shall be 
        conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in 
        consultation and coordination with the Federal 
        Emergency Management Agency and other appropriate 
        Federal agencies, andin consultation and coordination 
with appropriate State and local agencies and tribes.
            (3) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and 
        projects shall emphasize, to the maximum extent 
        practicable and appropriate, nonstructural approaches 
        to preventing or reducing flood damages.
            (4) Participation.--The studies and projects shall 
        be conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in 
        cooperation with State and local agencies and tribes to 
        ensure the coordination of local flood damage reduction 
        or riverine and wetland restoration studies with 
        projects that conserve, restore, and manage hydrologic 
        and hydraulic regimes and restore the natural functions 
        and values of floodplains.
    (c) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
            (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section 
        shall be subject to cost sharing in accordance with 
        section 105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
            (2) Environmental restoration and nonstructural 
        flood control projects.--
                    (A) In general.--The non-Federal interests 
                shall pay 35 percent of the cost of any 
                environmental restoration or nonstructural 
                flood control project carried out under this 
                section.
                    (B) Items provided by non-federal 
                interests.--The non-Federal interests shall 
                provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, 
                dredged material disposal areas, and 
                relocations necessary for such projects.
                    (C) Credit.--The value of such land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, dredged material 
                disposal areas, and relocations shall be 
                credited toward the payment required under this 
                paragraph.
            (3) Structural flood control projects.--Any 
        structural flood control projects carried out under 
        this section shall be subject to cost sharing in 
        accordance with section 103(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)).
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
        interests shall be responsible for all costs associated 
        with operating, maintaining, replacing, repairing, and 
        rehabilitating all projects carried out under this 
        section.
    (d) Project Justification.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law or requirement for economic 
        justification established under section 209 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), the 
        Secretary may implement a project under this section if 
        the Secretary determines that the project--
                    (A) will significantly reduce potential 
                flood damages;
                    (B) will improve the quality of the 
                environment; and
                    (C) is justified considering all costs and 
                beneficial outputs of the project.
            (2) Establishment of selection and rating criteria 
        and policies.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary, in cooperation with State and local 
                agencies and tribes, shall--
                            (i) develop, and submit to the 
                        Committee on Transportation and 
                        Infrastructure of the House of 
                        Representatives and the Committee on 
                        Environment and Public Works of the 
                        Senate, criteria for selecting and 
                        rating projects to be carried out under 
                        this section; and
                            (ii) establish policies and 
                        procedures for carrying out the studies 
                        and projects undertaken under this 
                        section.
                    (B) Criteria.--The criteria referred to in 
                subparagraph (A)(i) shall include, as a 
                priority, the extent to which the appropriate 
                State government supports the project.
    (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall examine appropriate locations, including--
            (1) Pima County, Arizona, at Paseo De Las Iglesias 
        and Rillito River;
            (2) Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California;
            (3) Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, California;
            (4) Murrieta Creek, California;
            (5) Napa River Valley watershed, California, at 
        Yountville, St Helena, Calistoga, and American Canyon;
            (6) Santa Clara basin, California, at Upper 
        Guadalupe River and Tributaries, San Francisquito 
        Creek, and Upper Penitencia Creek;
            (7) Pond Creek, Kentucky;
            (8) Red River of the North, Minnesota, North 
        Dakota, and South Dakota;
            (9) Connecticut River, New Hampshire;
            (10) Pine Mount Creek, New Jersey;
            (11) Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico;
            (12) Upper Delaware River, New York;
            (13) Briar Creek, North Carolina;
            (14) Chagrin River, Ohio;
            (15) Mill Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio;
            (16) Tillamook County, Oregon,
            (17) Willamette River basin, Oregon;
            (18) Blair County, Pennsylvania, at Altoona and 
        Frankstown Township;
            (19) Delaware River, Pennsylvania;
            (20) Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania;
            (21) Providence County, Rhode Island;
            (22) Shenandoah River, Virginia; and
            (23) Lincoln Creek, Wisconsin.
    (f) Program Review.--
            (1) In general.--The program established under this 
        section shall be subject to an independent review to 
        evaluate the efficacy of the program in achieving the 
        dual goals of flood hazard mitigation and riverine 
        restoration.
            (2) Report.--Not later than April 15, 2003, the 
        Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate a report on the findings of 
        the review conducted under this subsection with any 
        recommendations concerning continuation of the program.
    (g) Maximum Federal Cost per Project.--Not more than 
$30,000,000 may be expended by the United States on any single 
project under this section.
    (h) Procedure.--
            (1) All projects.--The Secretary shall not 
        implement any project under this section until--
                    (A) the Secretary submits to the Committee 
                on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
                and the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                a written notification describing the project 
                and the determinations made under subsection 
                (d)(1); and
                    (B) 21 calendar days have elapsed after the 
                date on which the notification was received by 
                the committees.
            (2) Projects exceeding $15,000,000.--
                    (A) Limitation on appropriations.--No 
                appropriation shall be made to construct any 
                project under this section the total Federal 
                cost of construction of which exceeds 
                $15,000,000 if the project has not been 
                approved by resolutions adopted by the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives and the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
                the Senate.
                    (B) Report.--For the purpose of securing 
                consideration of approval under this paragraph, 
                the Secretary shall submit a report on the 
                proposed project, including all relevant data 
                and information on all costs.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There are authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out this section--
                    (A) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;
                    (B) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2002; and
                    (C) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2003 through 2005.
            (2)  Full funding.--All studies and projects 
        carried out under this section from Army Civil Works 
        appropriations shall be fully funded within the program 
        funding levels provided in this subsection.

SEC. 213. SHORE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary shall review the implementation 
of the Corps of Engineers shore management program, with 
particular attention to--
            (1) inconsistencies in implementation among the 
        divisions and districts of the Corps of Engineers; and
            (2) complaints by or potential inequities regarding 
        property owners in the Savannah District, including an 
        accounting of the number and disposition of complaints 
        in the Savannah District during the 5-year period 
        preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Report.--As expeditiously as practicable, but not later 
than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
report describing the results of the review under subsection 
(a).

SEC. 214. SHORE DAMAGE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION.

    Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 
426i) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
                inserting ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; 
                and
                    (B) by inserting after ``navigation works'' 
                the following: ``and shore damage attributable 
                to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the 
                Gulf Intracoastal Waterway'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The 
        costs'' and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The costs'';
            (3) in the third sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``No such'' and inserting 
                the following:
    ``(c) Requirement for Specific Authorization.--No such''; 
and
                    (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and 
                inserting ``$5,000,000''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall--
            ``(1) coordinate the implementation of the measures 
        under this section with other Federal and non-Federal 
        shore protection projects in the same geographic area; 
        and
            ``(2) to the extent practicable, combine mitigation 
        projects with other shore protection projects in the 
        same area into a comprehensive regional project.''.

SEC. 215. SHORE PROTECTION.

    (a) Periodic Nourishment.--Section 103(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(d)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Costs of constructing'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) Construction.--Costs of constructing''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of a project 
                authorized for construction after December 31, 
                1999, or for which a feasibility study is 
                completed after that date, the non-Federal cost 
                of the periodic nourishment of the project, or 
                any measure for shore protection or beach 
                erosion control for the project, that is 
                carried out--
                            ``(i) after January 1, 2001, shall 
                        be 40 percent;
                            ``(ii) after January 1, 2002, shall 
                        be 45 percent; and
                            ``(iii) after January 1, 2003, 
                        shall be 50 percent.
                    ``(B) Benefits to privately owned shores.--
                All costs assigned to benefits of periodic 
                nourishment projects or measures to privately 
                owned shores (where use of such shores is 
                limited to private interests) or to prevention 
                of losses of private land shall be borne by the 
                non-Federal interest.
                    ``(C) Benefits to federally owned shores.--
                All costs assigned to the protection of 
                federally owned shores for periodic nourishment 
                measures shall be borne by the United 
                States.''.
    (b) Outer Continental Shelf.--
            (1) Use of sand from outer continental shelf.--
        Section 8(k)(2)(B) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 
        Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended in the second 
        sentence by striking ``an agency of the Federal 
        Government'' and inserting ``a Federal, State, or local 
        government agency''.
            (2) Reimbursement of local interests.--Any amounts 
        paid by non-Federal interests for beach erosion 
        control, hurricane protection, shore protection, or 
        storm damage reduction projects as a result of an 
        assessment under section 8(k) of the Outer Continental 
        Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)) shall be fully 
        reimbursed.
    (c) Report on Shores of the United States.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        report to Congress on the state of the shores of the 
        United States.
            (2) Contents.--The report shall include--
                    (A) a description of--
                            (i) the extent of, and economic and 
                        environmental effects caused by, 
                        erosion and accretion along the shores 
                        of the United States; and
                            (ii) the causes of such erosion and 
                        accretion;
                    (B) a description of resources committed by 
                Federal, State, and local governments to 
                restore and renourish shores;
                    (C) a description of the systematic 
                movement of sand along the shores of the United 
                States; and
                    (D) recommendations regarding--
                            (i) appropriate levels of Federal 
                        and non-Federal participation in shore 
                        protection; and
                            (ii) use of a systems approach to 
                        sand management.
            (3) Use of specific location data.--In developing 
        the report, the Secretary shall use data from specific 
        locations on the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific 
        Ocean, Great Lakes, and Gulf of Mexico.
    (d) National Coastal Data Bank.--
            (1) Establishment of data bank.--Not later than 2 
        years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall establish a national coastal data bank 
        containing data on the geophysical and climatological 
        characteristics of the shores of the United States.
            (2) Content.--To the extent practicable, the 
        national coastal data bank shall include data regarding 
        current and predicted shore positions, information on 
        federally authorized shore protection projects, and 
        data on the movement of sand along the shores of the 
        United States, including impediments to such movement 
        caused by natural and manmade features.
            (3) Access.--The national coastal data bank shall 
        be made readily accessible to the public.

SEC. 216. FLOOD PREVENTION COORDINATION.

    Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
709a) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 
        subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the 
        following:
    ``(b) Flood Prevention Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
coordinate with the Director of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency and the heads of other Federal agencies to 
ensure that flood control projects and plans are complementary 
and integrated to the extent practicable and appropriate.''.

SEC. 217. DISPOSAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL ON BEACHES.

    (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is amended in the 
first sentence by striking ``50'' and inserting ``35''.
    (b) Great Lakes Basin.--The Secretary shall work with the 
State of Ohio, other Great Lakes States, and political 
subdivisions of the States to fully implement and maximize 
beneficial reuse of dredged material as provided under section 
145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 
426j).
    (c) Bolivar Peninsula, Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston 
Counties, Texas.--The Secretary may design and construct a 
shore protection project between the south jetty of the Sabine 
Pass Channel and the north jetty of the Galveston Harbor 
Entrance Channel in Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston 
Counties, Texas, including beneficial use of dredged material 
from Federal navigation projects as provided under section 145 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 
426j).
    (d) Galveston Beach, Galveston County, Texas.--The 
Secretary may design and construct a shore protection project 
between the Galveston South Jetty and San Luis Pass, Galveston 
County, Texas, using innovative nourishment techniques, 
including beneficial use of dredged material from Federal 
navigation projects as provided under section 145 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).
    (e) Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary 
may place dredged material from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
on the beaches along Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas, to 
stabilize beach erosion as provided under section 145 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).

SEC. 218. ANNUAL PASSES FOR RECREATION.

    Section 208(c)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3 note; 110 Stat. 3681) is amended by 
striking ``later of December 31, 1999, or the date of 
transmittal of the report under paragraph (3)'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2003''.

SEC. 219. NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) Analysis of Benefits.--Section 308 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2318) is amended--
            (1) in the heading of subsection (a), by inserting 
        ``Exclusion of Elements From'' before ``Benefit-Cost'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as 
        subsections (c) through (f), respectively;
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the 
        following:
    ``(b) Flood Damage Reduction Benefits.--
            ``(1) In general.--In calculating the benefits of a 
        proposed project for nonstructural flood damage 
        reduction, the Secretary shall calculate the benefits 
        of the nonstructural project using methods similar to 
        those used for calculating the benefits of structural 
        projects, including similar treatment in calculating 
        the benefits from losses avoided.
            ``(2) Avoidance of double counting.--In carrying 
        out paragraph (1), the Secretary should avoid double 
        counting of benefits.''; and
            (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``subsection 
        (b)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)''.
    (b) Reevaluation of Flood Control Projects.--At the request 
of a non-Federal interest for a flood control project, the 
Secretary shall conduct a reevaluation of a project authorized 
before the date of enactment of this Act to consider 
nonstructural alternatives in light of the amendments made by 
subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(1) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Non-federal contribution in excess of 35 
        percent.--At any time during construction of a project, 
        if the Secretary determines that the costs of land, 
        easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal 
        areas, and relocations for the project, in combination 
        with other costs contributed by the non-Federal 
        interests, will exceed 35 percent, any additional costs 
        for the project (not to exceed 65 percent of the total 
        costs of the project) shall be a Federal responsibility 
        and shall be contributed during construction as part of 
        the Federal share.''.

SEC. 220. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (14), by inserting ``and nutrient 
        monitoring'' after ``growth'';
            (2) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;
            (3) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at 
        the end and inserting a semicolon; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California, removal 
        of silt and aquatic growth and measures to address 
        excessive sedimentation and high nutrient 
        concentration;
            ``(18) Flints Pond, Hollis, Hillsborough County, 
        New Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and 
        measures to address excessive sedimentation; and
            ``(19) Osgood Pond, Milford, Hillsborough County, 
        New Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and 
        measures to address excessive sedimentation.''.

SEC. 221. ENHANCEMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.

    Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the 
second sentence the following: ``Not more than 80 percent of 
the non-Federal share of such first costs may be satisfied 
through in-kind contributions, including facilities, supplies, 
and services that are necessary to carry out the enhancement 
project.''.

SEC. 222. PURCHASE OF AMERICAN-MADE EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--It is the sense of Congress that, to the 
extent practicable, all equipment and products purchased with 
funds made available under this Act should be American made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing 
financial assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the 
greatest extent practicable, shall provide to each recipient of 
the assistance a notice describing the statement made in 
subsection (a).

SEC. 223. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                    INTERESTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 211(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Any non-Federal 
        interest that has received from the Secretary pursuant 
        to subsection (b) or (c)'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) Studies and design activities under 
                subsection (b).--
                            ``(i) In general.--A non-Federal 
                        interest may carry out construction for 
                        which studies and design documents are 
                        prepared under subsection (b) only if 
                        the Secretary approves the project for 
                        construction.
                            ``(ii) Criteria for approval.--The 
                        Secretary shall approve a project for 
                        construction if the Secretary 
                        determines that the project is 
                        technically sound, economically 
                        justified, and environmentally 
                        acceptable and meets the requirements 
                        for obtaining the appropriate permits 
                        required under the authority of the 
                        Secretary.
                            ``(iii) No unreasonable withholding 
                        of approval.--The Secretary shall not 
                        unreasonably withhold approval of a 
                        project for construction.
                            ``(iv) No effect on regulatory 
                        authority.--Nothing in this 
                        subparagraph affects any regulatory 
                        authority of the Secretary.
                    ``(B) Studies and design activities under 
                subsection (c).--Any non-Federal interest that 
                has received from the Secretary under 
                subsection (c)''; and
            (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2), by 
        inserting ``(other than paragraph (1)(A))'' after 
        ``this subsection''.
    (b) Reimbursement.--
            (1) In general.--Section 211(e)(1) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-
        13(e)(1)) is amended--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
                (A), by inserting after ``constructed pursuant 
                to this section'' the following: ``and provide 
                credit for the non-Federal share of the 
                project'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking 
                ``and'' at the end;
                    (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 
                period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) if the construction work is 
                substantially in accordance with plans prepared 
                under subsection (b).''.
            (2) Special rules.--Section 211(e)(2)(A) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
        701b-13(e)(2)(A)) is amended--
                    (A) in the subparagraph heading, by 
                inserting ``or credit'' after 
                ``Reimbursement'';
                    (B) by striking ``subject to amounts being 
                made available in advance in appropriations 
                Acts'' and inserting ``subject to the 
                availability of appropriations''; and
                    (C) by inserting after ``the cost of such 
                work'' the following: ``, or provide credit 
                (depending on the request of the non-Federal 
                interest) for the non-Federal share of such 
                work,''.
            (3) Schedule and manner of reimbursements.--Section 
        211(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
        (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)) is amended by adding at the end 
        the following:
            ``(6) Schedule and manner of reimbursement.--
                    ``(A) Budgeting.--The Secretary shall 
                budget and request appropriations for 
                reimbursements under this section on a schedule 
                that is consistent with a Federal construction 
                schedule.
                    ``(B) Commencement of reimbursements.--
                Reimbursements under this section may commence 
                on approval of a project by the Secretary.
                    ``(C) Credit.--At the request of a non-
                Federal interest, the Secretary may reimburse 
                the non-Federal interest by providing credit 
                toward future non-Federal costs of the project.
                    ``(D) Scheduling.--Nothing in this 
                paragraph affects the discretion of the 
                President to schedule new construction 
                starts.''.

SEC. 224. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(33 U.S.C. 1272) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``50'' 
                and inserting ``35''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 
                ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``non-Federal 
        responsibility'' and inserting ``shared as a cost of 
        construction''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the 
        following:
            ``(6) Passaic River and Newark Bay, New Jersey.
            ``(7) Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.
            ``(8) Willamette River, Oregon.''.

SEC. 225. RECREATION USER FEES.

    (a) Withholding of Amounts.--
            (1) In general.--During fiscal years 1999 through 
        2002, the Secretary may withhold from the special 
        account established under section 4(i)(1)(A) of the 
        Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 
        460l-6a(i)(1)(A)) 100 percent of the amount of receipts 
        above a baseline of $34,000,000 per each fiscal year 
        received from fees imposed at recreation sites under 
        the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of 
        the Army under section 4(b) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 
        460l-6a(b)).
            (2) Use.--The amounts withheld shall be retained by 
        the Secretary and shall be available, without further 
        Act of appropriation, for expenditure by the Secretary 
        in accordance with subsection (b).
            (3) Availability.--The amounts withheld shall 
        remain available until September 30, 2005.
    (b) Use of Amounts Withheld.--In order to increase the 
quality of the visitor experience at public recreational areas 
and to enhance the protection of resources, the amounts 
withheld under subsection (a) may be used only for--
            (1) repair and maintenance projects (including 
        projects relating to health and safety);
            (2) interpretation;
            (3) signage;
            (4) habitat or facility enhancement;
            (5) resource preservation;
            (6) annual operation (including fee collection);
            (7) maintenance; and
            (8) law enforcement related to public use.
    (c) Availability.--Each amount withheld by the Secretary 
shall be available for expenditure, without further Act of 
appropriation, at the specific project from which the amount, 
above baseline, is collected.

SEC. 226. SMALL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), 
is amended by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting 
``$3,000,000''.

SEC. 227. USE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall comply with the 
requirements of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 
1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note; Public Law 105-270).
    (b) Compliance With Other Law.--
            (1) Inventory and review.--In carrying out this 
        section, the Secretary shall inventory and review all 
        activities that are not inherently governmental in 
        nature in accordance with the Federal Activities 
        Inventory Reform Act of 1998.
            (2) Architectural and engineering services.--Any 
        review and conversion by the Secretary to performance 
        by private enterprise of an architectural or 
        engineering service (including a surveying or mapping 
        service) shall be carried out in accordance with title 
        IX of the Federal Property and Administrative Services 
        Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 541 et seq.).

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, ALABAMA AND 
                    MISSISSIPPI.

    The Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation 
Project, Alabama and Mississippi, authorized by section 601(a) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4138), is modified to authorize the Secretary to complete the 
project at a cost of $93,530,000, in accordance with the post 
authorization change report dated August 17, 1998.

SEC. 302. OUZINKIE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project for 
navigation, Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska, shall be $8,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
the project referred to in subsection (a) to take into account 
the change in the Federal participation in the project under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 303. ST. PAUL HARBOR, ST. PAUL, ALASKA.

    The project for navigation, St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, 
Alaska, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified to 
include the construction of additional features for a small 
boat harbor with an entrance channel and maneuvering area 
dredged to a 20-foot depth and appropriate wave protection 
features at an additional estimated total cost of $12,700,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $7,700,000.

SEC. 304. LOGGY BAYOU, RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, ARKANSAS, 
                    LOUISIANA, OKLAHOMA, AND TEXAS.

    The project for flood control on the Red River below 
Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, 
authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 
Stat. 647), is modified to direct the Secretary to conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of expanding the project to 
include mile 0.0 to mile 7.8 of Loggy Bayou between the Red 
River and Flat River.

SEC. 305. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Sacramento 
River, California, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled 
``An Act to provide for the control of the floods of the 
Mississippi River and of the Sacramento River, California, and 
for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 949), 
and modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 301(b)(3) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3110), 
and title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 1841), is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary--
            (1) to carry out the portion of the project at 
        Glenn-Colusa, California, at a total cost of 
        $26,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $20,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,000,000; and
            (2) to carry out bank stabilization work in the 
        riverbed gradient facility, particularly in the 
        vicinity of River Mile 208, if the Secretary determines 
        that such work is necessary to protect the overall 
        integrity of the project, on the condition that 
        additional environmental review of the project is 
        conducted.

SEC. 306. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, San Lorenzo River, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to include as a part of the project 
streambank erosion control measures to be undertaken 
substantially in accordance with the report entitled ``Bank 
Stabilization Concept, Laurel Street Extension'', dated April 
23, 1998, at a total cost of $4,800,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $3,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$1,700,000.

SEC. 307. TERMINUS DAM, KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Transfer of Title to Additional Land.--If the non-
Federal interests for the project for flood control and water 
supply, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California, authorized by 
section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3667), transfer to the Secretary without 
consideration title to perimeter lands acquired for the project 
by the non-Federal interests, the Secretary may accept the 
transfer of that title.
    (b) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Nothing in this 
section changes, modifies, or otherwise affects the 
responsibility of the non-Federal interests to provide land, 
easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material 
disposal areas necessary for the Terminus Dam project and to 
perform operation and maintenance for the project.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--On request by the non-
Federal interests, the Secretary shall carry out operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the 
project if the non-Federal interests enter into a binding 
agreement with the Secretary to reimburse the Secretary for 100 
percent of the costs of such operation, maintenance, repair, 
replacement, and rehabilitation, and any other expenses 
incurred by the Corps of Engineers under this section.
    (d) Hold Harmless.--The non-Federal interests shall hold 
the United States harmless for ownership, operation, and 
maintenance of lands and facilities of the Terminus Dam project 
title to which is transferred to the Secretary under this 
section.

SEC. 308. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, DELAWARE, NEW 
                    JERSEY, AND PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River Mainstem and 
Channel Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 101(6) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), is modified as follows:
            (1) Credit for engineering and design and 
        construction management work.--The Secretary may 
        provide the non-Federal interests credit, toward cash 
        contributions required for construction and subsequent 
        to construction, for the costs of engineering and 
        design and construction management work that is 
        performed by the non-Federal interests and that the 
        Secretary determines is necessary to implement the 
        project. Any such credit shall reduce the Philadelphia 
        District's private sector performance goals for 
        engineering work by the amount of the credit.
            (2) Credit for costs of construction.--The 
        Secretary may provide the non-Federal interests credit, 
        toward cash contributions required during construction 
        and subsequent to construction, for the costs of 
        construction performed by the non-Federal interests on 
        behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary 
        determines is necessary to implement the project.
            (3) Payment of disposal or tipping fees.--The 
        Secretary may enter into an agreement with a non-
        Federal interest for the payment of disposal or tipping 
        fees for dredged material from a Federal project, other 
        than for the construction or operation and maintenance 
        of the new deepening project as described in the 
        Limited Reevaluation Report dated May 1997, if the non-
        Federal interest has supplied the corresponding 
        disposal capacity.
            (4) Disposal area management plan.--The Secretary 
        may enter into an agreement with a non-Federal interest 
        under which--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest may carry out 
                or cause to have carried out on behalf of the 
                Secretary a disposal area management program 
                for dredged material disposal areas necessary 
                to construct, operate, and maintain the 
                project; and
                    (B) the Secretary shall reimburse the non-
                Federal interest for the costs of carrying out 
                the program.

SEC. 309. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The project for flood control, Potomac River, Washington, 
District of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Act of 
June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1574, chapter 688), and modified by 
section 301(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3707), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct the project at a Federal cost of $5,965,000, in 
accordance with the post authorization change report dated June 
29, 1998.

SEC. 310. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
non-Federal interest, shall complete a study of any damage to 
the project for shore protection, Brevard County, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), to determine whether 
the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project.
    (b) Conditions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall use the services of an independent coastal expert, who 
shall consider all relevant studies completed by the Corps of 
Engineers and the local sponsor of the project.
    (c) Mitigation of Damage.--After completion of the study, 
the Secretary shall mitigate any damage to the shore protection 
project that is the result of a Federal navigation project. The 
costs of the mitigation shall be allocated to the Federal 
navigation project as operation and maintenance costs.

SEC. 311. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and 
Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary, on execution of a contract to 
construct the project, to reimburse the non-Federal interest 
for the Federal share of the cost of preconstruction planning 
and design for the project, if the Secretary determines that 
the work is compatible with and integral to the project.

SEC. 312. LEE COUNTY, CAPTIVA ISLAND SEGMENT, FLORIDA, PERIODIC BEACH 
                    NOURISHMENT.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lee 
County, Captiva Island segment, Florida, authorized by section 
506(b)(3)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3758), is modified to direct the Secretary to enter 
into an agreement with the non-Federal interest to carry out 
the project in accordance with section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1).
    (b) Decision Document.--The design memorandum approved in 
1996 shall be the decision document supporting continued 
Federal participation in cost sharing of the project.

SEC. 313. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection and 
harbor mitigation, Fort Pierce, Florida, authorized by section 
301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) and 
section 506(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is modified to incorporate 1 additional 
mile into the project in accordance with a final approved 
general reevaluation report, at a total cost for initial 
nourishment for the entire project of $9,128,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $7,073,500 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $2,054,500, at an average annual cost of 
$556,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $431,000 and 
an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $125,000.
    (b) Periodic Beach Nourishment.--Periodic beach nourishment 
is authorized for the project in accordance with section 
506(a)(2) of Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3757).

SEC. 314. NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for beach erosion control, Nassau County 
(Amelia Island), Florida, authorized by section 3(a)(3) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a total cost of $17,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$13,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,700,000, at 
an average annual cost of $1,177,000 for periodic nourishment 
over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual 
Federal cost of $807,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal 
cost of $370,000.

SEC. 315. MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to 
include construction of artificial reefs and related 
environmental mitigation required by Federal, State, and local 
environmental permitting agencies for the project, if the 
Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 316. ST. AUGUSTINE, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection and storm damage 
reduction, St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida, authorized 
by section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4133) is modified to include navigation 
mitigation as a project purpose and to be carried by the 
Secretary substantially in accordance with the general 
reevaluation report dated November 18, 1998, at a total cost of 
$17,208,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,852,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,356,000, and at an 
estimated average annual cost of $1,360,000 for periodic 
nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
estimated annual Federal cost of $1,095,000 and an estimated 
annual non-Federal cost of $265,000.

SEC. 317. MILO CREEK, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interests for 
65 percent of the reasonable costs of flood control for the 
South Division Street Segment, Milo Creek Flood Control 
Project, Idaho, to be constructed by the State of Idaho as 
described in the provision entitled ``Add Alternative I'' in 
the Milo Creek Phase II plans and specifications dated April 
1999.

SEC. 318. LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for storm damage reduction and 
shore protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, 
Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by 
section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified to provide for reimbursement 
for additional project work undertaken by the non-Federal 
interest.
    (b) Credit or Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall credit or 
reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of 
project costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in 
designing, constructing, or reconstructing reach 2F (700 feet 
south of Fullerton Avenue and 500 feet north of Fullerton 
Avenue), reach 3M (Meigs Field), and segments 7 and 8 of reach 
4 (43rd Street to 57th Street), if the non-Federal interest 
carries out the work in accordance with plans approved by the 
Secretary, at an estimated total cost of $83,300,000.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the Federal share of project costs 
incurred by the non-Federal interest in reconstructing the 
revetment structures protecting Solidarity Drive in Chicago, 
Illinois, before the signing of the project cooperation 
agreement, at an estimated total cost of $7,600,000.

SEC. 319. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

    Section 417 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3743) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of assistance 
provided under this section before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this subsection shall be 50 percent.''.

SEC. 320. OGDEN DUNES, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of beach 
erosion in and around the town of Ogden Dunes, Indiana, to 
determine whether the damage is the result of a Federal 
navigation project.
    (b) Mitigation of Damage.--If the Secretary determines that 
the damage described in subsection (a) is the result of a 
Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall take 
appropriate measures to mitigate the damage.
    (c) Cost.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated to 
the Federal navigation project as an operation and maintenance 
cost.

SEC. 321. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

    (a) Maximum Total Expenditure.--The maximum total 
expenditure for the project for streambank erosion, recreation, 
and pedestrian access features, Saint Joseph River, South Bend, 
Indiana, shall be $7,800,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
the project referred to in subsection (a) to take into account 
the change in the Federal participation in the project under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 322. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of 
the White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizingthe construction of certain public 
works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', 
approved June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586, chapter 688), as modified by 
section 323 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3716), is modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake the 
riverfront alterations described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront 
Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Canal Development (Upper 
Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost not to 
exceed $25,000,000, of which $12,500,000 is the estimated Federal cost 
and $12,500,000 is the estimated non-Federal cost, except that no such 
alterations may be undertaken unless the Secretary determines that the 
alterations authorized by this section, in combination with the 
alterations undertaken under section 323 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), are economically justified.

SEC. 323. DUBUQUE, IOWA.

    The project for navigation, Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482), 
is modified to authorize the development of a wetland 
demonstration area of approximately 1.5 acres to be developed 
and operated by the Dubuque County Historical Society or a 
successor nonprofit organization.

SEC. 324. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to 
        determine the feasibility of constructing a pump 
        adjacent to each of the 4 proposed drainage structures 
        for the Saint Charles Parish feature of the project; 
        and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
        pumps, with a Federal cost of 65 percent, if the 
        Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
        technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
        economically justified.

SEC. 325. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane protection Larose to Golden 
Meadow, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to convert the Golden Meadow floodgate into a 
navigation lock if the Secretary determines that the conversion 
is technically feasible, environmentally acceptable, and 
economically justified.

SEC. 326. LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary may credit against the non-Federal share work 
performed in the project area of the Louisiana State 
Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4117).

SEC. 327. TWELVE-MILE BAYOU, CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Red River Below Denison Dam project, authorized by 
section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is 
modified to incorporate the Twelve-Mile Bayou and levee from 
its confluence with the Red River and levee approximately 26 
miles upstream to the vicinity of Black Bayou, Caddo Parish, 
Louisiana.

SEC. 328. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
                    LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The project to prevent flood damage and 
for hurricane damage reduction, west bank of the Mississippi 
River (east of Harvey Canal), Louisiana, authorized by section 
401(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4128) and section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to direct 
the Secretary to continue Federal operation and maintenance of 
the portion of the project included in the report of the Chief 
of Engineers dated May 1, 1995, referred to as ``Algiers 
Channel''.
    (b) Combination of Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out 
work authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal 
project, the East of Harvey Canal project, and the Lake 
Cataouatche modifications as a single project, to be known as 
the ``West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, Louisiana, Hurricane 
Protection Project'', with a combined total cost of 
$280,300,000.

SEC. 329. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
Maryland, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
straighten the Tolchester Channel S-turn as part of project 
maintenance.

SEC. 330. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa 
County, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) and modified 
by section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3717), is further modified to provide that the 
amount to be paid by non-Federal interests under section 101(a) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211(a)) and section 330(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 shall not include any interest payments.

SEC. 331. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Jackson 
County, Mississippi, authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) and 
modified by section 504 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to provide a credit, not to exceed $5,000,000, toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs 
incurred by the Jackson County Board of Supervisors since 
February 8, 1994, in constructing the project, if the Secretary 
determines that the work is compatible with and integral to the 
project.

SEC. 332. BOIS BRULE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be allocated for the project for flood 
control, Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri, 
authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
(33 U.S.C. 701s), is $15,000,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
the project referred to in subsection (a) to take into account 
the change in Federal participation in the project under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section affects any 
cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred to 
in subsection (a) under title I of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 333. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, Meramec River Basin, Valley 
Park Levee, Missouri, authorized by section 2(h) of the Act 
entitled ``An Act to deauthorize several projects within the 
jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers'' (Public Law 97-
128; 95 Stat. 1682) and modified by section 1128 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4246), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000, if the Secretary 
determines that the project as modified is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 334. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, KANSAS, IOWA, 
                    AND NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The project for mitigation of fish and 
wildlife losses, Missouri River Bank Stabilization and 
Navigation Project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, 
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143) is modified to increase by 118,650 
acres the amount of land and interests in land to be acquired 
for the project.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with 
        the States of Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, 
        shall conduct a study to determine the cost of 
        restoring, under the authority of the Missouri River 
        fish and wildlife mitigation project, a total of 
        118,650 acres of lost Missouri River fish and wildlife 
        habitat.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to 
        Congress on the results of the study.

SEC. 335. WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, 
Nebraska, authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
Engineers dated June 29, 1998, at a total cost of $17,039,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $9,730,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $7,309,000.

SEC. 336. ABSECON ISLAND, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shore 
protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, Absecon 
Island, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), is 
modified to provide that if, after October 12, 1996, the non-
Federal interests carry out any work associated with the 
project that is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and 
approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may provide the non-
Federal interests credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project in an amount equal to the Federal share of 
the cost of the work, without interest.

SEC. 337. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, NEW 
                    JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, New York 
Harbor and Adjacent Channels, New York and New Jersey, 
authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to construct the portion of the project that is 
located between Military Ocean Terminal Bayonne and Global 
Terminal in Bayonne, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
$103,267,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $76,909,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $26,358,000.
    (b) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out 
work under the modification under subsection (a) until 
completion of a final report by the Chief of Engineers finding 
that the work is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, 
and economically justified.

SEC. 338. ARTHUR KILL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Arthur Kill, 
New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and 
modified by section 301(b)(11) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
Engineers dated July 23, 1999, at a total cost of $315,700,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $183,200,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $132,500,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary may provide non-Federal 
interests--
            (1) credit toward cash contributions required prior 
        to and during construction and subsequent to 
        construction for planning, engineering, and design and 
        construction management work that is performed by non-
        Federal interests and that the Secretary determines is 
        necessary to implement the project; and
            (2) credit toward cash contributions required 
        during construction and subsequent to construction for 
        the costs of construction carried out by the non-
        Federal interest on behalf of the Secretary and that 
        the Secretary determines is necessary to implement the 
        project.

SEC. 339. KILL VAN KULL AND NEWARK BAY CHANNELS, NEW YORK AND NEW 
                    JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay 
Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized by chapter IV of 
title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 
313), section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4095), and section 301(b)(12) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide the non-Federal 
interests credit toward cash contributions required--
            (1) before, during, and after construction for 
        planning, engineering and design, and construction 
        management work that is performed by the non-Federal 
        interests and that the Secretary determines is 
        necessary to implement the project; and
            (2) during and after construction for the costs of 
        the construction that the non-Federal interests carry 
        out on behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary 
        determines is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 340. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    Section 552 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``for the 
        project to be carried out with such assistance'' and 
        inserting ``, or a public entity designated by the 
        State director, to carry out the project with the 
        assistance, subject to the project's meeting the 
        certification requirement of subsection (c)(1)''; and
            (2) in subsection (i), by striking ``$22,500,000'' 
        and inserting ``$42,500,000''.

SEC. 341. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$18,000,000''.

SEC. 342. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK.

    The project for combined beach erosion control and 
hurricane protection, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, Long 
Island, New York, authorized by section 101(a) of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 483) and modified by the River and 
Harbor Act of 1962, the Water Resources Development Act of 
1974, and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is 
further modified to direct the Secretary, in coordination with 
the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, to 
complete all procedures and reviews expeditiously and to adopt 
and submit to Congress, not later than 120 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, a mutually acceptable shore erosion 
plan for the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the 
project.

SEC. 343. BROKEN BOW LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA.

    The project for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow 
Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by 
section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187), 
section 102(v) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4808), and section 338 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3720), is further modified 
to require the Secretary to make seasonal adjustments to the 
top of the conservation pool at the project, if the Secretary 
determines that the adjustments will be undertaken at no cost 
to the United States and will adequately protect affected water 
and related resources, as follows:
            (1) Maintain an elevation of 599.5 from November 1 
        through March 31.
            (2) Increase elevation gradually from 599.5 to 
        602.5 during April and May.
            (3) Maintain an elevation of 602.5 from June 1 to 
        September 30.
            (4) Decrease elevation gradually from 602.5 to 
        599.5 during October.

SEC. 344. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, 
                    OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
Oregon, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project substantially 
in accordance with the Feature Memorandum dated July 31, 1998, 
at a total cost of $64,741,000, if the Secretary determines 
that the project as modified is technically sound and 
environmentally acceptable.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report that--
            (1) states the reasons for the increase in the cost 
        of the project;
            (2) outlines the steps that the Corps of Engineers 
        is taking to control project costs, including the 
        application of value engineering and other appropriate 
        measures; and
            (3) includes a cost estimate for, and 
        recommendations on the advisability of, adding fish 
        screens to the project.

SEC. 345. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 562 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3784) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Recreation Facilities.--The Secretary--
            ``(1) may provide design and construction 
        assistance for recreational facilities at Curwensville 
        Lake; and
            ``(2) may require the non-Federal interest to 
        provide not more than 25 percent of the cost of 
        designing and constructing the recreational 
        facilities.''.

SEC. 346. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River, Philadelphia to 
Wilmington, Pennsylvania and Delaware, authorized by section 
3(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4014), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend 
the channel of the Delaware River at Camden, New Jersey, to 
within 150 feet of the existing bulkhead and to relocate the 
40-foot deep Federal navigation channel, eastward within 
Philadelphia Harbor, from the Ben Franklin Bridge to the Walt 
Whitman Bridge, into deep water, if the Secretary determines 
that the project as modified is technically sound, economically 
acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 347. MUSSERS DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 209 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4830) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection 
        (e).

SEC. 348. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 564(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3785) is amended by striking ``$2,700,000'' and 
inserting ``$4,000,000''.

SEC. 349. NINE MILE RUN, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    If the Secretary determines that the documentation is 
integral to the project, the Secretary shall credit against the 
non-Federal share such costs, not to exceed $1,000,000, as are 
incurred by the non-Federal interests in preparing the 
environmental restoration report, planning and design-phase 
scientific and engineering technical services documentation, 
and other preconstruction documentation for the habitat 
restoration project, Nine Mile Run, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 350. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Recreation Partnership Initiative.--Section 519(b) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2328 
note; 110 Stat. 3765) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
        (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Engineering and design services.--The 
        Secretary may perform engineering and design services 
        for project infrastructure expected to be associated 
        with the development of the site at Raystown Lake, 
        Hesston, Pennsylvania.''.
    (b) Construction Assistance.--
            (1) In general.--Consistent with the master plan 
        described in section 318 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4848), the Secretary 
        may provide a grant to Juniata College for the 
        construction of facilities and structures at Raystown 
        Lake, Pennsylvania, to interpret and understand 
        environmental conditions and trends. As a condition of 
        the receipt of financial assistance, officials at 
        Juniata College shall coordinate the construction with 
        the Baltimore District of the Army Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
        subsection $5,000,000.

SEC. 351. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 313(g)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846; 
110 Stat. 3723) is amended by striking ``$80,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$180,000,000''.
    (b) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Section 313(g) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Corps of engineers expenses.--10 percent of 
        the amounts appropriated to carry out this section for 
        each of fiscal years 2000 through 2002 may be used by 
        the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
        and implement projects under this section at 100 
        percent Federal expense.''.

SEC. 352. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Fox Point, 
Providence, Rhode Island, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 306), is modified to direct 
the Secretary to undertake the necessary repairs to the 
barrier, as identified in the Condition Survey and Technical 
Assessment dated April 1998, with Supplement dated August 1998, 
at a total cost of $3,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $1,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,050,000.

SEC. 353. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The project for rediversion, Cooper River, 
Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section 101 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731) and modified by 
title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
1992 (105 Stat. 517), is further modified to authorize the 
Secretary to pay to the State of South Carolina not more than 
$3,750,000 if the Secretary and the State enter into a binding 
agreement for the State to perform all future operation of the 
fish lift at St. Stephen, South Carolina, including performance 
of studies to assess the efficacy of the fish lift.
    (b) Contents of Agreement.--The agreement under subsection 
(a) shall specify--
            (1) the terms and conditions under which payment 
        will be made; and
            (2) the rights of, and remedies available to, the 
        Federal Government to recover all or a portion of the 
        payment if the State suspends or terminates operation 
        of the fish lift or fails to operate the fish lift in a 
        manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Maintenance.--Maintenance of the fish lift shall remain 
a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 354. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS.

    Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3789) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or nonstructural 
                actions'' after ``flood control works 
                constructed''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``or nonstructural 
                actions'' after ``construction of the 
                project''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' 
                at the end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the 
                period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the project for flood control, Clear Creek, 
        Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control 
        Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 742).''.

SEC. 355. CYPRESS CREEK, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cypress 
Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to carry out a nonstructural flood 
control project at a total cost of $5,000,000.
    (b) Reimbursement for Work.--The Secretary may reimburse 
the non-Federal interest for the Cypress Creek project for work 
done by the non-Federal interest on the nonstructural flood 
control project in an amount equal to the estimate of the 
Federal share, without interest, of the cost of the work--
            (1) if, after authorization and before initiation 
        of construction of the nonstructural project, the 
        Secretary approves the plans for construction of the 
        nonstructural project by the non-Federal interest; and
            (2) if the Secretary finds, after a review of 
        studies and design documents prepared to carry out the 
        nonstructural project, that construction of the 
        nonstructural project is economically justified and 
        environmentally acceptable.

SEC. 356. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway Extension, 
Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat.1091) and modified by section 351 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724), is 
further modified to add environmental restoration and recreation as 
project purposes.

SEC. 357. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UTAH.

    The project for flood control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, 
authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610) and modified by 
section 301(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to carry out the locally preferred project, entitled 
``Upper Jordan River Flood Control Project, Salt Lake County, 
Utah--Supplemental Information'' and identified in the document 
of Salt Lake County, Utah, dated July 30, 1998, at a total cost 
of $12,870,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,580,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,290,000, if the 
Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 358. ELIZABETH RIVER, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after September 
30, 1999, the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be 
obligated to make the annual cash contribution required under 
paragraph 1(9) of the Local Cooperation Agreement dated 
December 12, 1978, between the Government and the city for the 
project for navigation, southern branch of the Elizabeth River, 
Chesapeake, Virginia.

SEC. 359. COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL, WASHINGTON AND OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Columbia River 
between Vancouver, Washington, and The Dalles, Oregon, 
authorized by the first section of the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 
Stat. 637, chapter 595), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct an alternate barge channel to traverse the high 
span of the Interstate Route 5 bridge between Portland, Oregon, 
and Vancouver, Washington, to a depth of 17 feet, with a width 
of approximately 200 feet through the high span of the bridge 
and a width of approximately 300 feet upstream of the bridge.
    (b) Distance Upstream.--The channel shall continue upstream 
of the bridge approximately 2,500 feet to about river mile 107, 
then to a point of convergence with the main barge channel at 
about river mile 108.
    (c) Distance Downstream.--
            (1) Southern edge.--The southern edge of the 
        channel shall continue downstream of the bridge 
        approximately 1,500 feet to river mile 106+10, then 
        turn northwest to tie into the edge of the Upper 
        Vancouver Turning Basin.
            (2) Northern edge.--The northern edge of the 
        channel shall continue downstream of the bridge to the 
        Upper Vancouver Turning Basin.

SEC. 360. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' 
and inserting ``$47,000,000''.

SEC. 361. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4810) is amended by striking ``take such 
measures as are technologically feasible'' and inserting 
``implement Plan C/G, as defined in the Evaluation Report of 
the District Engineer dated December 1996,''.

SEC. 362. MOOREFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Effective October 1, 1999, the project for flood control, 
Moorefield, West Virginia, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610), 
is modified to provide that the non-Federal interest shall not 
be required to pay the unpaid balance, including interest, of 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project.

SEC. 363. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3790) is amended by striking subsection (a) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may design and construct--
            ``(1) flood control measures in the Cheat and 
        Tygart River basins, West Virginia, at a level of 
        protection that is sufficient to prevent any future 
        losses to communities in the basins from flooding such 
        as occurred in January 1996, but not less than a 100-
        year level of protection; and
            ``(2) structural and nonstructural flood control, 
        streambank protection, stormwater management, and 
        channel clearing and modification measures in the lower 
        Allegheny, lower Monongahela, West Branch Susquehanna, 
        and Juniata River basins, Pennsylvania, at a level of 
        protection that is sufficient to prevent any future 
        losses to communities in the basins from flooding such 
        as occurred in January 1996, but not less than a 100-
        year level of flood protection with respect to measures 
        that incorporate levees or floodwalls.''.

SEC. 364. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects is authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
economically justified, as appropriate:
            (1) Indian river county, florida.--The project for 
        shore protection, Indian River County, Florida, 
        authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4134) and 
        deauthorized under section 1001(b)(1) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        579a(b)(1)).
            (2) Lido key beach, sarasota, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for shore 
                protection, Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida, 
                authorized by section 101 of the River and 
                Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819) and 
                deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                579a(b)), at a total cost of $5,200,000, with 
                an estimated Federal cost of $3,380,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $1,820,000.
                    (B) Periodic nourishment.--The Secretary 
                may carry out periodic nourishment for the 
                project for a 50-year period at an estimated 
                average annual cost of $602,000, with an 
                estimated annual Federal cost of $391,000 and 
                an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
                $211,000.
            (3) Cass river, michigan (vassar).--The project for 
        flood protection, Cass River, Michigan (Vassar), 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1958 (72 Stat. 311) and deauthorized under section 
        1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
            (4) Saginaw river, michigan (shiawassee flats).--
        The project for flood control, Saginaw River, Michigan 
        (Shiawassee Flats), authorized by section 203 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) and 
        deauthorized under section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        579a(b)(2)).
            (5) Park river, grafton, north dakota.--The project 
        for flood control, Park River, Grafton, North Dakota, 
        authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4121) and 
        deauthorized under section 1001(a) of that Act (33 
        U.S.C. 579a(a)), at a total cost of $28,100,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $18,265,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $9,835,000.
            (6) Memphis harbor, memphis, tennessee.--The 
        project for navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis, 
        Tennessee, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4145) and 
        deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(a) of that Act 
        (33 U.S.C 579a(a)), is authorized to be carried out by 
        the Secretary.

SEC. 365. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of 
projects are not authorized after the date of enactment of this 
Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of 
        the project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2.4-
        acre anchorage area, 9 feet deep, and an adjacent 0.6-
        acre anchorage, 6 feet deep, located on the west side 
        of Johnsons River.
            (2) Clinton harbor, connecticut.--The portion of 
        the project for navigation, Clinton Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by section 2 of the Act of 
        March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13, chapter 19), and House 
        Document 240, 76th Congress, 1st Session, lying 
        upstream of a line designated by the points 
        N158,592.12, E660,193.92 and N158,444.58, E660,220.95.
            (3) Bass harbor, maine.--The following portions of 
        the project for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, 
        authorized on May 7, 1962, under section 107 of the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
                    (A) Beginning at a bend in the project, 
                N149040.00, E538505.00, thence running easterly 
                about 50.00 feet along the northern limit of 
                the project to a point N149061.55, E538550.11, 
                thence running southerly about 642.08 feet to a 
                point, N14877.64, E538817.18, thence running 
                southwesterly about 156.27 feet to a point on 
                the westerly limit of the project, N148348.50, 
                E538737.02, thence running northerly about 
                149.00 feet along the westerly limit of the 
                project to a bend in the project, N148489.22, 
                E538768.09, thence running northwesterly about 
                610.39 feet along the westerly limit of the 
                project to the point of origin.
                    (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly 
                limit of the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, 
                thence running southeasterly about 91.92 feet 
                to a point, N148041.43, E538739.07, thence 
                running southerly about 65.00 feet to a point, 
                N147977.86, E538725.51, thence running 
                southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a point on 
                the westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, 
                E538648.39, thence running northerly about 
                195.00 feet along the westerly limit of the 
                project to the point of origin.
            (4) Boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for 
        navigation, Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
        Act of July 25, 1912 (37 Stat. 201, chapter 253).
            (5) Bucksport harbor, maine.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bucksport Harbor, Maine, 
        authorized by the first section of the Act of June 13, 
        1902 (32 Stat. 331, chapter 1079), consisting of a 16-
        foot deep channel beginning at a point N268.748.16, 
        E423.390.76, thence running north 47 degrees 02 minutes 
        23 seconds east 51.76 feet to a point N268.783.44, 
        E423.428.64, thence running north 67 degrees 54 minutes 
        32 seconds west 1513.94 feet to a point N269.352.81, 
        E422.025.84, thence running south 47 degrees 02 minutes 
        23 seconds west 126.15 feet to a point N269.266.84, 
        E421.933.52, thence running south 70 degrees 24 minutes 
        28 seconds east 1546.79 feet to the point of origin.
            (6) Carvers harbor, vinalhaven, maine.--The portion 
        of the project for navigation, Carvers Harbor, 
        Vinalhaven, Maine, authorized by the Act of June 3, 
        1896 (commonly known as the ``River and Harbor 
        Appropriations Act of 1896'') (29 Stat. 202, chapter 
        314), consisting of the 16-foot anchorage beginning at 
        a point with coordinates N137,502.04, E895,156.83, 
        thence running south 6 degrees 34 minutes 57.6 seconds 
        west 277.660 feet to a point N137,226.21, E895,125.00, 
        thence running north 53 degrees, 5 minutes 42.4 seconds 
        west 127.746 feet to a point N137,302.92, E895022.85, 
        thence running north 33 degrees 56 minutes 9.8 seconds 
        east 239.999 feet to the point of origin.
            (7) East boothbay harbor, maine.--Section 364 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 is amended 
        by striking paragraph (9) (110 Stat. 3734) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for 
        navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
        the first section of the Act entitled `An Act making 
        appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
        preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
        harbors, and for other purposes', approved June 25, 
        1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter 382).''.
            (8) Searsport harbor, searsport, maine.--The 
        portion of the project for navigation, Searsport 
        Harbor, Searsport, Maine, authorized by section 101 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1173), 
        consisting of the 35-foot turning basin beginning at a 
        point with coordinates N225,008.38, E395,464.26, thence 
        running north 43 degrees 49 minutes 53.4 seconds east 
        362.001 feet to a point N225,269.52, E395,714.96, 
        thence running south 71 degrees 27 minutes 33.0 seconds 
        east 1,309.201 feet to a point N224,853.22, 
        E396,956.21, thence running north 84 degrees 3 minutes 
        45.7 seconds west 1,499.997 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (9) Wells harbor, maine.--The following portions of 
        the project for navigation, Wells Harbor, Maine, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
        of 1960 (74 Stat. 480):
                    (A) The portion of the 6-foot channel the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with 
                coordinates N177,992.00, E394,831.00, thence 
                running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 14.8 
                seconds west 10.38 feet to a point N177,990.91, 
                E394,820.68, thence running south 11 degrees 46 
                minutes 47.7 seconds west 991.76 feet to a 
                point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running 
                south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 
                10.00 feet to a point N177,018.00, E394,628.00, 
                thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.8 
                seconds east 994.93 feet to the point of 
                origin.
                    (B) The portion of the 6-foot anchorage the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with 
                coordinates N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence 
                running south 51 degrees 58 minutes 32.7 
                seconds west 15.49 feet to a point N177,768.53, 
                E394,324.76, thence running south 11 degrees 46 
                minutes 26.5 seconds west 672.87 feet to a 
                point N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence running 
                south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 
                10.00 feet to a point N177,107.78, E394,197.25, 
                thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 25.4 
                seconds east 684.70 feet to the point of 
                origin.
                    (C) The portion of the 10-foot settling 
                basin the boundaries of which begin at a point 
                with coordinates N177,107.78, E394,197.25, 
                thence running north 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 
                seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,109.82, 
                E394,187.46, thence running south 11 degrees 46 
                minutes 15.7 seconds west 300.00 feet to a 
                point N176,816.13, E394,126.26, thence running 
                south 78 degrees 12 minutes 21.4 seconds east 
                9.98 feet to a point N176,814.09, E394,136.03, 
                thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 29.1 
                seconds east 300.00 feet to the point of 
                origin.
                    (D) The portion of the 10-foot settling 
                basin the boundaries of which begin at a point 
                with coordinates N177,018.00, E394,628.00, 
                thence running north 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 
                seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,020.04, 
                E394,618.21, thence running south 11 degrees 46 
                minutes 44.0 seconds west 300.00 feet to a 
                point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running 
                south 78 degrees 12 minutes 30.3 seconds east 
                10.03 feet to a point N176,724.31, E394,566.79, 
                thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.4 
                seconds east 300.00 feet to the point of 
                origin.
            (10) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion 
        of the project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172) lying 
        southeasterly of a line commencing at a point 
        N199,286.41, E844,394.91, thence running north 66 
        degrees 52 minutes 3.31 seconds east 472.95 feet to a 
        point N199,472.21, E844,829.83, thence running north 43 
        degrees 9 minutes 28.3 seconds east 262.64 feet to a 
        point N199,633.80, E845,009.48, thence running north 21 
        degrees 40 minutes 11.26 seconds east 808.38 feet to a 
        point N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 32 
        degrees 25 minutes 29.01 seconds east 160.76 feet to a 
        point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence running north 24 
        degrees 56 minutes 42.29 seconds east 1,410.29 feet to 
        a point N201,829.48, E845,988.97.
            (11) Green harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of 
        the project for navigation, Green Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, undertaken pursuant to section 107 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
        consisting of the 6-foot deep channel beginning at a 
        point along the west limit of the existing project, 
        north 395990.43, east 831079.16, thence running 
        northwesterly about 752.85 feet to a point, north 
        396722.80, east 830904.76, thence running northwesterly 
        about 222.79 feet to a point along the west limit of 
        the existing project, north 396844.34, east 830718.04, 
        thence running southwesterly about 33.72 feet along the 
        west limit of the existing project to a point, north 
        396810.80, east 830714.57, thence running southeasterly 
        about 195.42 feet along the west limit of the existing 
        project to a point, north 396704.19, east 830878.35, 
        thence running about 544.66 feet along the west limit 
        of the existing project to a point, north 396174.35, 
        east 831004.52, thence running southeasterly about 
        198.49 feet along the west limit of the existing 
        project to the point of beginning.
            (12) New bedford and fairhaven harbor, 
        massachusetts.--The following portions of the project 
        for navigation, New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, 
        Massachusetts:
                    (A) A portion of the 25-foot spur channel 
                leading to the west of Fish Island, authorized 
                by section 3 of the Act of March 3, 1909 (35 
                Stat. 816, chapter 264), beginning at a point 
                with coordinates N232,173.77, E758,791.32, 
                thence running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 
                seconds west 38.2 feet to a point N232,139.91, 
                E758,773.61, thence running south 87 degrees 35 
                minutes 31.6 seconds west 196.84 feet to a 
                point N232,131.64, E758,576.94, thence running 
                north 47 degrees 47 minutes 48.4 seconds west 
                502.72 feet to a point N232,469.35, 
                E758,204.54, thence running north 10 degrees 10 
                minutes 20.3 seconds west 438.88 feet to a 
                point N232,901.33, E758,127.03, thence running 
                north 79 degrees 49 minutes 43.1 seconds east 
                121.69 feet to a point N232,922.82, 
                E758,246.81, thence running south 04 degrees 29 
                minutes 17.6 seconds east 52.52 feet to a point 
                N232,870.46, E758,250.92, thence running south 
                23 degrees 56 minutes 11.2 seconds east 49.15 
                feet to a point N323,825.54, E758,270.86, 
                thence running south 79 degrees 49 minutes 27.0 
                seconds west 88.19 feet to a point N232,809.96, 
                E758,184.06, thence running south 10 degrees 10 
                minutes 25.7 seconds east 314.83 feet to a 
                point N232,500.08, E758,239.67, thence running 
                south 56 degrees 33 minutes 56.1 seconds east 
                583.07 feet to a point N232,178.82, 
                E758,726.25, thence running south 85 degrees 33 
                minutes 16.0 seconds east to the point of 
                origin.
                    (B) A portion of the 30-foot west 
                maneuvering basin, authorized by the first 
                section of the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 
                918, chapter 847), beginning at a point with 
                coordinates N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence 
                running north 81 degrees 49 minutes 30.1 
                seconds east 160.76 feet to a point 
                N232,162.77, E758.932.74, thence running north 
                85 degrees 33 minutes 16.0 seconds west 141.85 
                feet to a point N232,173.77, E758,791.32, 
                thence running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 
                seconds west to the point of origin.
    (b) Anchorage Area, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut.--The 
portion of the Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, navigation project 
referred to in subsection (a)(2) beginning at a point with 
coordinates N158,444.58, E660,220.95, thence running north 79 
degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds east 833.31 feet to a point 
N158,594.72, E661,040.67, thence running south 80 degrees 51 
minutes 53 seconds east 181.21 feet to a point N158,565.95, 
E661,219.58, thence running north 57 degrees 38 minutes 04 
seconds west 126.02 feet to a point N158,633.41, E660,113.14, 
thence running south 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds west 
911.61 feet to a point N158,469.17, E660,216.44, thence running 
south 10 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds east 25 feet returning 
to a point N158,444.58, E660,220.95, is redesignated as an 
anchorage area.
    (c) Wells Harbor, Maine.--
            (1) Project modification.--The Wells Harbor, Maine, 
        navigation project referred to in subsection (a)(9) is 
        modified to authorize the Secretary to realign the 
        channel and anchorage areas based on a harbor design 
        capacity of 150 craft.
            (2) Redesignations.--
                    (A) 6-foot anchorage.--The following 
                portions of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation 
                project referred to in subsection (a)(9) shall 
                be redesignated as part of the 6-foot 
                anchorage:
                            (i) The portion of the 6-foot 
                        channel the boundaries of which begin 
                        at a point with coordinates 
                        N177,990.91, E394,820.68, thence 
                        running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 
                        40.8 seconds west 94.65 feet to a point 
                        N177,980.98, E394,726.55, thence 
                        running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 
                        22.4 seconds west 962.83 feet to a 
                        point N177,038.40, E394,530.10, thence 
                        running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 
                        45.7 seconds east 90.00 feet to a point 
                        N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence 
                        running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 
                        47.7 seconds east 991.76 feet to the 
                        point of origin.
                            (ii) The portion of the 10-foot 
                        inner harbor settling basin the 
                        boundaries of which begin at a point 
                        with coordinates N177,020.04, 
                        E394,618.21, thence running north 78 
                        degrees 13 minutes 30.5 seconds west 
                        160.00 feet to a point N177,052.69, 
                        E394,461.58, thence running south 11 
                        degrees 46 minutes 45.4 seconds west 
                        299.99 feet to a point N176,759.02, 
                        E394,400.34, thence running south 78 
                        degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 
                        160 feet to a point N176,726.36, 
                        E394,556.97, thence running north 11 
                        degrees 46 minutes 44.0 seconds east 
                        300.00 feet to the point of origin.
                    (B) 6-foot channel.--The following portion 
                of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project 
                referred to in subsection (a)(9) shall be 
                redesignated as part of the 6-foot channel: the 
                portion of the 6-foot anchorage the boundaries 
                of which begin at a point with coordinates 
                N178,102.26, E394,751.83, thence running south 
                51 degrees 59 minutes 42.1 seconds west 526.51 
                feet to a point N177,778.07, E394,336.96, 
                thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 26.6 
                seconds west 511.83 feet to a point 
                N177,277.01, E394,232.52, thence running south 
                78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 80.00 
                feet to a point N177,260.68, E394,310.84, 
                thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 24.8 
                seconds east 482.54 feet to a point 
                N177,733.07, E394,409.30, thence running north 
                51 degrees 59 minutes 41.0 seconds east 402.63 
                feet to a point N177,980.98, E394,726.55, 
                thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 27.6 
                seconds east 123.89 feet to the point of 
                origin.
            (3) Realignment.--The 6-foot anchorage area 
        described in paragraph (2)(B) shall be realigned to 
        include the area located south of the inner harbor 
        settling basin in existence on the date of enactment of 
        this Act beginning at a point with coordinates 
        N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running north 78 
        degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds west 160.00 feet to a 
        point N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south 11 
        degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds west 45 feet to a point 
        N176,714.97, E394,391.15, thence running south 78 
        degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds 160.00 feet to a point 
        N176,682.31, E394,547.78, thence running north 11 
        degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds east 45 feet to the 
        point of origin.
            (4) Relocation.--The Secretary may relocate the 
        settling basin feature of the Wells Harbor, Maine, 
        navigation project referred to in subsection (a)(9) to 
        the outer harbor between the jetties.
            (5) Additional actions.--In carrying out the 
        operation and the maintenance of the Wells Harbor, 
        Maine, navigation project referred to in subsection 
        (a)(9), the Secretary shall undertake each of the 
        actions of the Corps of Engineers specified in section 
        IV(B) of the memorandum of agreement relating to the 
        project dated January 20, 1998, including the actions 
        specified in section IV(B) that the parties agreed to 
        ask the Corps of Engineers to undertake.
            (6) Conservation easement.--The Secretary of the 
        Interior, acting through the Director of the United 
        States Fish and Wildlife Service, may accept a 
        conveyance of the right, but not the obligation, to 
        enforce a conservation easement to be held by the State 
        of Maine over certain land owned by the town of Wells, 
        Maine, that is adjacent to the Rachel Carson National 
        Wildlife Refuge.
    (d) Anchorage Area, Green Harbor, Massachusetts.--The 
portion of the Green Harbor, Massachusetts, navigation project 
referred to in subsection (a)(11) consisting of a 6-foot deep 
channel that lies northerly of a line the coordinates of which 
are North 394825.00, East 831660.00 and North 394779.28, East 
831570.64 is redesignated as an anchorage area.

SEC. 366. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
American and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by 
section 101(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663), is modified to direct the Secretary 
to include the following improvements as part of the overall 
project:
            (1) Raising the left bank of the non-Federal levee 
        upstream of the Mayhew Drain for a distance of 4,500 
        feet by an average of 2.5 feet.
            (2) Raising the right bank of the American River 
        levee from 1,500 feet upstream to 4,000 feet downstream 
        of the Howe Avenue bridge by an average of 1 foot.
            (3) Modifying the south levee of the Natomas Cross 
        Canal for a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the 
        south levee is consistent with the level of protection 
        provided by the authorized levee along the east bank of 
        the Sacramento River.
            (4) Modifying the north levee of the Natomas Cross 
        Canal for a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the 
        height of the levee is equivalent to the height of the 
        south levee as authorized by paragraph (3).
            (5) Installing gates to the existing Mayhew Drain 
        culvert and pumps to prevent backup of floodwater on 
        the Folsom Boulevard side of the gates.
            (6) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of 
        the American River from the east levee of the Natomas 
        east Main Drain upstream for a distance of 
        approximately 1.2 miles.
            (7) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of 
        the American River from 300 feet west of Jacob Lane 
        north for a distance of approximately 1 mile to the end 
        of the existing levee.
    (b) Cost Limitations.--Section 101(a)(1)(A) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662) is amended 
by striking ``at a total cost of'' and all that follows through 
``$14,225,000,'' and inserting the following: ``at a total cost 
of $91,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $68,925,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,975,000,''.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--For the purposes of section 103 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), the 
modifications authorized by this section shall be subject to 
the same cost sharing in effect for the project for flood 
damage reduction, American and Sacramento Rivers, California, 
authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662).

SEC. 367. MARTIN, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control, Martin, Kentucky, authorized 
by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to take all necessary measures to 
prevent future losses that would occur as a result of a flood 
equal in magnitude to a 100-year frequency event.

SEC. 368. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program under this 
section $40,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 
30, 1992. Such sums shall remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 369. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, JACKSON, ALABAMA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Black Warrior 
and Tombigbee Rivers, vicinity of Jackson, Alabama, authorized 
by section 106 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1987 (100 Stat. 3341-199), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to acquire land for mitigation of the 
habitat losses attributable to the project, including the 
navigation channel, dredged material disposal areas, and other 
areas directly affected by construction of the project.
    (b) Construction Before Acquisition of Mitigation Land.--
Notwithstanding section 906 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the Secretary may construct the 
project before acquisition of the mitigation land if the 
Secretary takes such actions as are necessary to ensure that 
any required mitigation land will be acquired not later than 2 
years after initiation of construction of the new channel and 
that the acquisition will fully mitigate any adverse 
environmental impacts resulting from the project.

SEC. 370. TROPICANA WASH AND FLAMINGO WASH, NEVADA.

    Any Federal costs associated with the Tropicana Wash and 
Flamingo Wash, Nevada, authorized by section 101(13) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), 
incurred by the non-Federal interest to accelerate or modify 
construction of the project, in cooperation with the Corps of 
Engineers, shall be eligible for reimbursement by the 
Secretary.

SEC. 371. COMITE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Comite River Diversion Project for flood control, 
authorized as part of the project for flood control, Amite 
River and Tributaries, Louisiana, by section 101(11) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802) and 
modified by section 301(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to include the costs of highway 
relocations to be cost shared as a project construction 
feature.

SEC. 372. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation, St. Marys River, Michigan, is 
modified to direct the Secretary to provide an additional foot 
of overdraft between Point Louise Turn and the Locks, Sault 
Sainte Marie, Michigan, consistent with the channels upstream 
of Point Louise Turn. The modification shall be carried out as 
operation and maintenance to improve navigation safety.

SEC. 373. CHARLEVOIX, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall review and, if consistent with 
authorized project purposes, reimburse the city of Charlevoix, 
Michigan, for the Federal share of costs associated with 
construction of the new revetment connection to the Federal 
navigation project at Charlevoix Harbor, Michigan.

SEC. 374. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the project for 
flood control, power generation, and other purposes at the 
White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 
4 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218, chapter 795), and 
modified by House Document 917, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and 
House Document 290, 77th Congress, 1st Session, approved August 
18, 1941, and House Document 499, 83d Congress, 2d Session, 
approved September 3, 1954, and by section 304 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide minimum flows 
necessary to sustain tail water trout fisheries by reallocating 
the following amounts of project storage: Beaver Lake, 1.5 
feet; Table Rock, 2 feet; Bull Shoals Lake, 5 feet; Norfork 
Lake, 3.5 feet; and Greers Ferry Lake, 3 feet.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--No funds may be obligated to carry 
        out work on the modification under subsection (a) until 
        completion of a final report by the Chief of Engineers 
        finding that the work is technically sound, 
        environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
            (2) Timing.--The Secretary shall submit the report 
        to Congress not later than July 30, 2000.
            (3) Contents.--The report shall include 
        determinations concerning whether--
                    (A) the modification under subsection (a) 
                adversely affects other authorized project 
                purposes; and
                    (B) Federal costs will be incurred in 
                connection with the modification.

SEC. 375. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA, WATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES.

    For the project for construction of the water conveyances 
authorized by the first section of Public Law 88-253 (77 Stat. 
841), the requirements for the Waurika Project Master 
Conservancy District to repay the $2,900,000 in costs 
(including interest) resulting from the October 1991 settlement 
of the claim before the United States Claims Court, and to make 
a payment of $595,000 of the final cost representing a portion 
of the difference between the 1978 estimate of cost and the 
actual cost determined after completion of the project in 1991, 
are waived.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. DEEP DRAFT HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of 
non-Federal cost-sharing requirements for the construction and 
operation and maintenance of deep draft harbor projects to 
determine whether--
            (1) cost sharing adversely affects United States 
        port development or domestic and international trade; 
        and
            (2) any revision of the cost-sharing requirements 
        would benefit United States domestic and international 
        trade.
    (b) Recommendations.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than May 30, 2001, the 
        Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives any recommendations that the Secretary 
        may have in light of the study under subsection (a).
            (2) Considerations.--In making recommendations, the 
        Secretary shall consider--
                    (A) the potential economic, environmental, 
                and budgetary impacts of any proposed revision 
                of the cost-sharing requirements; and
                    (B) the effect that any such revision would 
                have on regional port competition.

SEC. 402. BOYDSVILLE, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of the reservoir and associated improvements to 
provide for flood control, recreation, water quality, and fish 
and wildlife purposes in the vicinity of Boydsville, Arkansas.

SEC. 403. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of constructing water intake facilities at Greers 
Ferry Lake, Arkansas.

SEC. 404. DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of designating a permanent disposal site for 
dredged material from Federal navigation projects in Del Norte 
County, California.

SEC. 405. FRAZIER CREEK, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
            (1) the feasibility of restoring Frazier Creek, 
        Tulare County, California; and
            (2) the Federal interest in flood control, 
        environmental restoration, conservation of fish and 
        wildlife resources, recreation, and water quality of 
        the creek.

SEC. 406. MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a general 
reevaluation to determine the Federal interest in reconfiguring 
the Mare Island Strait channel.
    (b) Considerations.--In determining the Federal interest, 
the Secretary shall consider the benefits of economic activity 
associated with potential future uses of the channel and any 
other benefits that could be realized by increasing the width 
and depth of the channel to accommodate both current and 
potential future uses of the channel.

SEC. 407. STRAWBERRY CREEK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
            (1) the feasibility of restoring Strawberry Creek, 
        Berkeley, California; and
            (2) the Federal interest in environmental 
        restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife 
        resources, recreation, and water quality of the creek.

SEC. 408. SWEETWATER RESERVOIR, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the potential water 
quality problems and pollution abatement measures in the 
watershed in and around Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, 
California.

SEC. 409. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall complete a study to determine the 
feasibility of a flood damage reduction project in the 
Whitewater River basin (also known as ``Thousand Palms''), 
California.

SEC. 410. DESTIN-NORIEGA POINT, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of--
            (1) restoring Noriega Point, Florida, to serve as a 
        breakwater for Destin Harbor; and
            (2) including Noriega Point as part of the East 
        Pass, Florida, navigation project.

SEC. 411. LITTLE ECONLACKHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of pollution abatement 
measures in the Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.

SEC. 412. PORT EVERGLADES, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of constructing a sand bypassing project at the 
Port Everglades Inlet, Florida.

SEC. 413. LAKE ALLATOONA, ETOWAH RIVER, AND LITTLE RIVER WATERSHED, 
                    GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may carry 
out the following water-related environmental restoration and 
resource protection investigations into restoring Lake 
Allatoona, the Etowah River, and the Little River watershed, 
Georgia:
            (1) Lake allatoona/etowah river shoreline 
        restoration investigation.--Feasibility phase 
        investigation to identify and recommend to Congress 
        structural and nonstructural measures to alleviate 
        shore erosion and sedimentation problems along the 
        shores of Lake Allatoona and the Etowah River.
            (2) Little river environmental restoration 
        investigation.--Feasibility phase investigation to 
        evaluate environmental problems and recommend 
        environmental restoration measures (including 
        appropriate environmental structural and nonstructural 
        measures) for the Little River watershed, Georgia.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated for the period beginning with fiscal year 
2000--
            (1) $850,000 to carry out subsection (a)(1); and
            (2) $500,000 to carry out subsection (a)(2).

SEC. 414. BOISE, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking flood control on the Boise River in 
Boise, Idaho.

SEC. 415. GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED, OAKLEY, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking flood damage reduction, water 
conservation, ground water recharge, ecosystem restoration, and 
related activities along the Goose Creek watershed near Oakley, 
Idaho.

SEC. 416. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of restoring and repairing the Lava Rock Little 
Wood River Containment System to prevent flooding in the city 
of Gooding, Idaho.

SEC. 417. SNAKE RIVER, LEWISTON, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking bank stabilization and flood control 
on the Snake River at Lewiston, Idaho.

SEC. 418. SNAKE RIVER AND PAYETTE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a flood control project along the 
Snake River and Payette River, in the vicinity of Payette, 
Idaho.

SEC. 419. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS AND 
                    WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
Wisconsin, upstream of the confluence with Salt Creek at 
Riverside, Illinois, to determine the feasibility of 
improvements in the interests of flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration and protection, water quality, recreation, and related 
purposes.
    (b) Special Rule.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
may not exclude from consideration and evaluation flood damage 
reduction measures based on restrictive policies regarding the 
frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of 
runoff.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out 
this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State 
        agencies; and
            (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the 
        date of enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and 
        efforts of Federal agencies and States.

SEC. 420. CAMERON PARISH WEST OF CALCASIEU RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a storm damage reduction and 
ecosystem restoration project for Cameron Parish west of 
Calcasieu River, Louisiana.

SEC. 421. COASTAL LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of using dredged material from maintenance 
activities at Federal navigation projects in coastal Louisiana 
to benefit coastal areas in the State.

SEC. 422. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LOUISIANA.

    In carrying out a study of the storm damage reduction 
benefits to Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, the Secretary 
shall include benefits that a storm damage reduction project 
for Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, may have on the 
mainland coast of Louisiana as project benefits attributable to 
the Grand Isle project.

SEC. 423. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ECOSYSTEM, CHEF MENTEUR TO SABINE 
                    RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration 
and protection measures along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
from Chef Menteur to Sabine River, Louisiana.
    (b) Matters To Be Addressed.--The study shall address 
saltwater intrusion, tidal scour, erosion, compaction, 
subsidence, wind and wave action, bank failure, and other 
problems relating to ecosystem restoration and protection.

SEC. 424. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the January 
1999 study commissioned by the Boston Parks and Recreation 
Department, Boston, Massachusetts, and entitled ``The Emerald 
Necklace Environmental Improvement Master Plan, Phase I Muddy 
River Flood Control, Water Quality and Habitat Enhancement'', 
to determine whether the plans outlined in the study for flood 
control, water quality, habitat enhancements, and other 
improvements to the Muddy River in Brookline and Boston, 
Massachusetts, are cost-effective, technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and in the Federal interest.
    (b) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2000, the Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
evaluation.

SEC. 425. WESTPORT, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of undertaking a navigation project 
for the town of Westport, Massachusetts.
    (b) Considerations.--In determining the benefits of the 
project, the Secretary shall include the benefits derived from 
using dredged material for shore protection and storm damage 
reduction.

SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Plan.--The Secretary, in coordination with State and 
local governments and appropriate Federal and provincial 
authorities of Canada, shall develop a comprehensive management 
plan for St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair.
    (b) Elements.--The plan shall include the following 
elements:
            (1) Identification of the causes and sources of 
        environmental degradation.
            (2) Continuous monitoring of organic, biological, 
        metallic, and chemical contamination levels.
            (3) Timely dissemination of information of 
        contamination levels to public authorities, other 
        interested parties, and the public.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report that includes the plan developed under subsection (a) 
and recommendations for potential restoration measures.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $400,000.

SEC. 427. ST. CLAIR SHORES, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of constructing a flood control project at St. 
Clair Shores, Michigan.

SEC. 428. WOODTICK PENINSULA, MICHIGAN, AND TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of using dredged material from Toledo Harbor, Ohio, 
to provide erosion reduction, navigation, and ecosystem 
restoration at Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan.

SEC. 429. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine an alternative plan for dredged material management 
for the Pascagoula River portion of the project for navigation, 
Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4094).
    (b) Contents.--The study under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include an analysis of the feasibility of 
        expanding the Singing River Island Disposal Area or 
        constructing a new dredged material disposal facility; 
        and
            (2) identify methods of managing and reducing 
        sediment transport into the Federal navigation channel.

SEC. 430. TUNICA LAKE WEIR, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of constructing an outlet weir at 
Tunica Lake, Tunica County, Mississippi, and Lee County, 
Arkansas, for the purpose of stabilizing water levels in the 
lake.
    (b) Economic Analysis.--In carrying out the study, the 
Secretary shall include as part of the economic analysis the 
benefits derived from recreation uses at Tunica Lake and 
economic benefits associated with restoration of fish and 
wildlife habitat.

SEC. 431. YELLOWSTONE RIVER, MONTANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive 
study of the Yellowstone River from Gardiner, Montana, to the 
confluence of the Missouri River to determine the hydrologic, 
biological, and socioeconomic cumulative impacts on the river.
    (b) Consultation and Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
conduct the study in consultation with the United States Fish 
and Wildlife Service, the United States Geological Survey, and 
the Natural Resources Conservation Service and with the full 
participation of the State of Montana and tribal and local 
entities, and provide for public participation.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study.

SEC. 432. LAS VEGAS VALLEY, NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
comprehensive study of water resources in the Las Vegas Valley, 
Nevada.
    (b) Objectives.--The study shall identify problems and 
opportunities related to ecosystem restoration, water quality 
(particularly the quality of surface runoff), and flood 
control.

SEC. 433. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project for flood damage reduction 
in the Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

SEC. 434. CAYUGA CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project for flood control for 
Cayuga Creek, New York.

SEC. 435. LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NEW YORK AND VERMONT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of restoring Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont, 
to improve water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and 
navigation.

SEC. 436. OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of establishing a flood forecasting system in the 
Oswego River basin, New York.

SEC. 437. WHITE OAK RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether 
there is a Federal interest in a project for water quality, 
environmental restoration and protection, and related purposes 
on the White Oak River, North Carolina.

SEC. 438. ARCOLA CREEK WATERSHED, MADISON, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project to provide environmental 
restoration and protection for the Arcola Creek watershed, 
Madison, Ohio.

SEC. 439. CLEVELAND HARBOR, CLEVELAND, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking repairs and related navigation 
improvements at Dike 14, Cleveland, Ohio.

SEC. 440. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking navigation improvements on the 
Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.

SEC. 441. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OHIO, INDIANA, AND MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
develop measures to improve flood control, navigation, water 
quality, recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat in a 
comprehensive manner in the western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, 
Indiana, and Michigan, including watersheds of the Maumee, 
Ottawa, and Portage Rivers.
    (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) cooperate with interested Federal, State, and 
        local agencies and nongovernmental organizations; and
            (2) consider all relevant programs of the agencies.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study, including findings and 
recommendations.

SEC. 442. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project for flood control for the 
Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 443. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review pertinent 
reports and conduct other studies and field investigations to 
determine the best available science and methods for management 
of contaminated dredged material and sediments in the coastal 
areas of South Carolina.
    (b) Focus.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall place particular focus on areas where the Corps of 
Engineers maintains deep draft navigation projects, such as 
Charleston Harbor, Georgetown Harbor, and Port Royal, South 
Carolina.
    (c) Cooperation.--The studies shall be conducted in 
cooperation with the appropriate Federal and State 
environmental agencies.

SEC. 444. SANTEE DELTA FOCUS AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall complete a comprehensive study of 
the ecosystem in the Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina, 
to determine the feasibility of undertaking a project to 
enhance wetland habitat and public recreational opportunities 
in the area.

SEC. 445. WACCAMAW RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a flood control project for the 
Waccamaw River in Horry County, South Carolina.

SEC. 446. DAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct--
            (1) an investigation of flooding and other water 
        resources problems between the James River and Big 
        Sioux watersheds, South Dakota; and
            (2) an assessment of flood damage reduction needs 
        of the area.

SEC. 447. NIOBRARA RIVER AND MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Niobrara River 
watershed and the operations of Fort Randall Dam and Gavins 
Point Dam on the Missouri River, South Dakota, to determine the 
feasibility of alleviating the bank erosion, sedimentation, and 
related problems in the lower Niobrara River and the Missouri 
River below Fort Randall Dam.

SEC. 448. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall include, as part of the study 
authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Public Works and 
Transportation of the House of Representatives dated August 1, 
1990, a review of two 175-foot-wide barge shelves on either 
side of the navigation channel at the Port of Corpus Christi, 
Texas.

SEC. 449. MITCHELL'S CUT CHANNEL (CANEY FORK CUT), TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project for navigation, Mitchell's 
Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.

SEC. 450. MOUTH OF COLORADO RIVER, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project for navigation at the 
mouth of the Colorado River, Texas, to provide a minimum draft 
navigation channel extending from the Colorado River through 
Parkers Cut (also known as ``Tiger Island Cut''), or an 
acceptable alternative, to Matagorda Bay.

SEC. 451. SANTA CLARA RIVER, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to alleviate 
damage caused by flooding, bank erosion, and sedimentation 
along the watershed of the Santa Clara River, Utah, above the 
Gunlock Reservoir.
    (b) Contents.--The study shall include an analysis of 
watershed conditions and water quality, as related to flooding 
and bank erosion, along the Santa Clara River in the vicinity 
of Gunlock, Utah.

SEC. 452. MOUNT ST. HELENS, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration 
improvements throughout the Cowlitz and Toutle River basins, 
Washington, including the 6,000 acres of wetland, riverine, 
riparian, and upland habitats lost or altered due to the 
eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 and subsequent emergency 
actions.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) work in close coordination with local 
        governments, watershed entities, the State of 
        Washington, and other Federal agencies; and
            (2) place special emphasis on--
                    (A) conservation and restoration strategies 
                to benefit species that are listed or proposed 
                for listing as threatened or endangered species 
                under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
                U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (B) other watershed restoration objectives.

SEC. 453. KANAWHA RIVER, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of developing a public port along the Kanawha River 
in Fayette County, West Virginia, at a site known as 
``Longacre''.

SEC. 454. WEST VIRGINIA PORTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of expanding public port development in West 
Virginia along the Ohio River and the navigable portion of the 
Kanawha River from its mouth to river mile 91.0.

SEC. 455. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

    (a) Strategic Plans.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
        comprehensive study of the Great Lakes region to ensure 
        the future use, management, and protection of water 
        resources and related resources of the Great Lakes 
        basin.
            (2) Report.--
                    (A) In general.--As expeditiously as 
                possible, but not later than 3 years after the 
                date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 
                years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                and the Committee on Environment and Public 
                Works of the Senate a report outlining a 
                strategic plan for Corps of Engineers programs 
                and proposed Corps of Engineers projects in the 
                Great Lakes basin.
                    (B) Contents.--The plan shall include--
                            (i) details of projects in the 
                        Great Lakes region relating to--
                                    (I) navigation 
                                improvements, maintenance, and 
                                operations for commercial and 
                                recreational vessels;
                                    (II) environmental 
                                restoration activities;
                                    (III) water level 
                                maintenance activities;
                                    (IV) technical and planning 
                                assistance to States and 
                                remedial action planning 
                                committees;
                                    (V) sediment transport 
                                analysis, sediment management 
                                planning, and activities to 
                                support prevention of excess 
                                sediment loadings;
                                    (VI) flood damage reduction 
                                and shoreline erosion 
                                prevention; and
                                    (VII) all other relevant 
                                activities of the Corps of 
                                Engineers; and
                            (ii) an analysis of factors 
                        limiting use of programs and 
                        authorities of the Corps of Engineers 
                        in existence on the date of enactment 
                        of this Act in the Great Lakes basin, 
                        including the need for new or modified 
                        authorities.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
        $1,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2000 through 
        2003.
    (b) Great Lakes Biohydrological Information.--
            (1) Inventory.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 90 days 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall request each Federal agency 
                that may possess information relevant to the 
                Great Lakes biohydrological system to provide 
                an inventory of all such information in the 
                possession of the agency.
                    (B) Relevant information.--For the purpose 
                of subparagraph (A), relevant information 
                includes information on--
                            (i) ground and surface water 
                        hydrology;
                            (ii) natural and altered tributary 
                        dynamics;
                            (iii) biological aspects of the 
                        system influenced by and influencing 
                        water quantity and water movement;
                            (iv) meteorological projections and 
                        the impacts of weather conditions on 
                        Great Lakes water levels; and
                            (v) other Great Lakes 
                        biohydrological system data relevant to 
                        sustainable water use management.
            (2) Report.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 18 months 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary, in consultation with the States, 
                Indian tribes, and Federal agencies, and after 
                requesting information from the provinces and 
                the federal government of Canada, shall--
                            (i) compile the inventories of 
                        information;
                            (ii) analyze the information for 
                        consistency and gaps; and
                            (iii) submit to Congress, the 
                        International Joint Commission, and the 
                        Great Lakes States a report that 
                        includes recommendations on ways to 
                        improve the information base on the 
                        biohydrological dynamics of the Great 
                        Lakes ecosystem as a whole, so as to 
                        support environmentally sound decisions 
                        regarding diversions and consumptive 
                        uses of Great Lakes water.
                    (B) Recommendations.--The recommendations 
                in the report under subparagraph (A) shall 
                include recommendations relating to the 
                resources and funds necessary for implementing 
                improvement of the information base.
                    (C) Considerations.--In developing the 
                report under subparagraph (A), the Secretary, 
                in cooperation with the Secretary of State, the 
                Secretary of Transportation, and the heads of 
                other agencies as appropriate, shall consider 
                and report on the status of the issues 
                described and recommendations made in--
                            (i) the Report of the International 
                        Joint Commission to the Governments of 
                        the United States and Canada under the 
                        1977 reference issued in 1985; and
                            (ii) the 1993 Report of the 
                        International Joint Commission to the 
                        Governments of Canada and the United 
                        States on Methods of Alleviating 
                        Adverse Consequences of Fluctuating 
                        Water Levels in the Great Lakes St. 
                        Lawrence Basin.
    (c) Great Lakes Recreational Boating.--Not later than 18 
months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, 
using information and studies in existence on the date of 
enactment of this Act to the extent practicable, and in 
cooperation with the Great Lakes States, shall submit to 
Congress a report detailing the economic benefits of 
recreational boating in the Great Lakes basin, particularly at 
harbors benefiting from operation and maintenance projects of 
the Corps of Engineers.
    (d) Cooperation.--In undertaking activities under this 
section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) encourage public participation; and
            (2) cooperate, and, as appropriate, collaborate, 
        with Great Lakes States, tribal governments, and 
        Canadian federal, provincial, and tribal governments.
    (e) Water Use Activities and Policies.--The Secretary may 
provide technical assistance to the Great Lakes States to 
develop interstate guidelines to improve the consistency and 
efficiency of State-level water use activities and policies in 
the Great Lakes basin.
    (f) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary may seek and accept funds 
from non-Federal entities to be used to pay up to 25 percent of 
the cost of carrying out subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).

SEC. 456. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM.

    In consultation with the St. Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation, the Secretary shall review the Great Lakes 
Connecting Channel and Harbors Report dated March 1985 to 
determine the feasibility of undertaking any modification of 
the recommendations made in the report to improve commercial 
navigation on the Great Lakes navigation system, including 
locks, dams, harbors, ports, channels, and other related 
features.

SEC. 457. NUTRIENT LOADING RESULTING FROM DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of nutrient 
loading that occurs as a result of discharges of dredged 
material into open-water sites in the Chesapeake Bay.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study.

SEC. 458. UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND ILLINOIS RIVERS LEVEES AND STREAMBANKS 
                    PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of erosion damage to 
levees and other flood control structures on the upper 
Mississippi and Illinois Rivers and the impact of increased 
barge and pleasure craft traffic on deterioration of the levees 
and other flood control structures.

SEC. 459. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall develop a plan to 
address water resource and related land resource problems and 
opportunities in the upper Mississippi and Illinois River 
basins, from Cairo, Illinois, to the headwaters of the 
Mississippi River, in the interest of systemic flood damage 
reduction by means of--
            (1) structural and nonstructural flood control and 
        floodplain management strategies;
            (2) continued maintenance of the navigation 
        project;
            (3) management of bank caving and erosion;
            (4) watershed nutrient and sediment management;
            (5) habitat management;
            (6) recreation needs; and
            (7) other related purposes.
    (b) Contents.--The plan under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) contain recommendations on management plans and 
        actions to be carried out by the responsible Federal 
        and non-Federal entities;
            (2) specifically address recommendations to 
        authorize construction of a systemic flood control 
        project for the upper Mississippi River; and
            (3) include recommendations for Federal action 
        where appropriate and recommendations for follow-on 
        studies for problem areas for which data or current 
        technology does not allow immediate solutions.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out 
this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State 
        agencies; and
            (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the 
        date of enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and 
        efforts of Federal agencies and States in developing 
        the plan under subsection (a).
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Development.--Development of the plan under 
        subsection (a) shall be at Federal expense.
            (2) Feasibility studies.--Feasibility studies 
        resulting from development of the plan shall be subject 
        to cost sharing under section 105 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
    (e) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate a report that includes the plan under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 460. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of 
controlling and managing waterborne debris in the interest of 
navigation, flood control, environmental restoration, and other 
purposes in the Susquehanna River Basin, New York, 
Pennsylvania, and Maryland, and the upper Chesapeake Bay, 
Maryland.
    (b) Evaluation of Technologies and Practices.--The study 
shall include an evaluation of technologies and practices 
currently available, in use, or in development in the United 
States for debris removal programs at various dams and harbors 
and recommendations for applying those techniques and practices 
in the Susquehanna River and the upper Chesapeake Bay.
    (c) Cooperation.--The study shall be conducted in 
cooperation with State agencies and other Federal agencies, the 
Susquehanna River Basin Commission, and owners of major dams.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. CORPS ASSUMPTION OF NRCS PROJECTS.

    (a) Llagas Creek, California.--The Secretary may complete 
the remaining reaches of the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service flood control project at Llagas Creek, California, 
undertaken pursuant to section 5 of the Watershed Protection 
and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1005), substantially in 
accordance with the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
watershed plan for Llagas Creek, Department of Agriculture, and 
in accordance with the requirements of local cooperation as 
specified in section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1004), at a total 
cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$21,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,200,000.
    (b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.--
            (1) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir project, an 
        element of the project for flood control, Chicagoland 
        Underflow Plan, Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
        Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
        include additional permanent flood control storage 
        attributable to the Natural Resources Conservation 
        Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 84), Little 
        Calumet River Watershed, Illinois, approved under the 
        Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 
        U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
            (2) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry 
        out work under the modification under paragraph (1) 
        until completion and approval by the Secretary of a 
        final report by the Chief of Engineers finding that the 
        work is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, 
        and economically justified.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton Reservoir 
        project shall be shared in accordance with section 103 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2213).
            (4) Transitional storage.--The Secretary of 
        Agriculture may cooperate with non-Federal interests to 
        provide, on a transitional basis, flood control storage 
        for the Natural Resources Conservation Service Thornton 
        Reservoir (Structure 84) project in the west lobe of 
        the Thornton quarry.
            (5) Credit toward non-federal share.--The Secretary 
        may credit toward the non-Federal share of the costs of 
        the Thornton Reservoir project all design and 
        construction costs incurred by the non-Federal 
        interests before the date of signing of the project 
        cooperation agreement.
            (6) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary shall 
        determine the credits authorized by paragraph (5) that 
        are integral to the Thornton Reservoir project and the 
        current total project costs based on a limited 
        reevaluation report.

SEC. 502. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is 
amended by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(5) $25,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(2);
            ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(9);
            ``(7) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(16); and
            ``(8) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(17).''.
    (b) Additional Assistance.--Section 219 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(f) Additional Assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance under subsection (a) and assistance for construction 
for the following:
            ``(1) Atlanta, georgia.--The project described in 
        subsection (c)(2), modified to include $25,000,000 for 
        watershed restoration and development in the regional 
        Atlanta watershed, including Big Creek and Rock Creek.
            ``(2) Paterson, passaic county, and passaic valley, 
        new jersey.--The project described in subsection 
        (c)(9), modified to include $20,000,000 for drainage 
        facilities to alleviate flooding problems on Getty 
        Avenue in the vicinity of St. Joseph's Hospital for the 
        city of Paterson, New Jersey, and Passaic County, New 
        Jersey, and innovative facilities to manage and treat 
        additional flows in the Passaic Valley, Passaic River 
        basin, New Jersey.
            ``(3) Nashua, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Nashua, New Hampshire.
            ``(4) Fall river and new bedford, massachusetts.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control 
        combined sewer overflows in the cities of Fall River 
        and New Bedford, Massachusetts.
            ``(5) Findlay township, pennsylvania.--$11,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure in Findlay 
        Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(6) Dillsburg borough authority, pennsylvania.--
        $2,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Franklin Township, York County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(7) Hampden township, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 
        for water, sewer, and storm sewer improvements in 
        Hampden Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(8) Towamencin township, pennsylvania.--
        $1,500,000 for sanitary sewer and water and wastewater 
        infrastructure in Towamencin Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(9) Dauphin county, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for 
        a project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows and water system rehabilitation for the city 
        of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(10) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--
        $20,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure projects in the counties of Accomac, 
        Northampton, Lee, Norton, Wise, Scott, Russell, 
        Dickenson, Buchanan, and Tazewell, Virginia.
            ``(11) Northeast pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in the counties of 
        Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, 
        Wayne, Sullivan, Bradford, and Monroe, Pennsylvania, 
        including assistance for the Mountoursville Regional 
        Sewer Authority, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(12) Calumet region, indiana.--$10,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure projects in the counties 
        of Lake and Porter, Indiana.
            ``(13) Clinton county, pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 
        for water related infrastructure in Clinton County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(14) Patton township, pennsylvania.--$1,400,000 
        for water related infrastructure in Patton Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(15) North fayette township, allegheny county, 
        pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water related 
        infrastructure in North Fayette Township, Allegheny 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(16) Springdale borough, pennsylvania.--$500,000 
        for water related infrastructure in Springdale Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(17) Robinson township, pennsylvania.--$1,200,000 
        for water related infrastructure in Robinson Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(18) Upper allen township, pennsylvania.--
        $3,400,000 for water related infrastructure in Upper 
        Allen Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(19) Jefferson township, greene county, 
        pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure in Jefferson Township, Greene County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(20) Lumberton, north carolina.--$1,700,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure projects in 
        Lumberton, North Carolina.
            ``(21) Baton rouge, louisiana.--$10,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure for the parishes of East 
        Baton Rouge, Ascension, and Livingston, Louisiana.
            ``(22) East san joaquin county, california.--
        $25,000,000 for ground water recharge and conjunctive 
        use projects in Stockton East Water District, 
        California.
            ``(23) Sacramento area, california.--$25,000,000 
        for regional water conservation and recycling projects 
        in Placer and El Dorado Counties and the San Juan 
        Suburban Water District, California.
            ``(24) Cumberland county, tennessee.--$5,000,000 
        for water supply projects in Cumberland County, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(25) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--
        $5,000,000 for water supply treatment and distribution 
        projects in the counties of Calhoun, Clarendon, 
        Colleton, Dorchester, Orangeberg, and Sumter, South Carolina.
            ``(26) Bridgeport, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Bridgeport, Connecticut.
            ``(27) Hartford, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Hartford, Connecticut.
            ``(28) New haven, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of New Haven, Connecticut.
            ``(29) Oakland county, michigan.--$20,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the cities of Berkley, Ferndale, Madison 
        Heights, Royal Oak, Birmingham, Hazel Park, Oak Park, 
        Southfield, Clawson, Huntington Woods, Pleasant Ridge, 
        and Troy, and the village of Beverly Hills, and the 
        Charter Township of Royal Oak, Michigan.
            ``(30) Desoto county, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for 
        a wastewater treatment project in the county of DeSoto, 
        Mississippi.
            ``(31) Kansas city, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Kansas City, Missouri.
            ``(32) St. louis, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of St. Louis, Missouri.
            ``(33) Elizabeth, new jersey.--$20,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey.
            ``(34) North hudson, new jersey.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of North Hudson, New Jersey.
            ``(35) Inner harbor project, new york, new york.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control 
        combined sewer overflows for the inner harbor project, 
        New York, New York.
            ``(36) Outer harbor project, new york, new york.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control 
        combined sewer overflows for the outer harbor project, 
        New York, New York.
            ``(37) Lebanon, new hampshire.--$8,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Lebanon, New Hampshire.
            ``(38) Astoria, oregon.--$5,000,000 for a project 
        to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the 
        city of Astoria, Oregon.
            ``(39) Cache county, utah.--$5,000,000 for a 
        wastewater infrastructure project for Cache County, 
        Utah.
            ``(40) Lawton, oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for a 
        wastewater infrastructure project for the city of 
        Lawton, Oklahoma.
            ``(41) Lancaster, california.--$1,500,000 for a 
        project to provide water facilities for the Fox Field 
        Industrial Corridor, Lancaster, California.
            ``(42) San ramon valley, california.--$15,000,000 
        for a project for recycled water for San Ramon Valley, 
        California.
            ``(43) Harbor/south bay, california.--$15,000,000 
        for an industrial water reuse project for the Harbor/
        South Bay area, California.''.

SEC. 503. CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT DREDGING TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Review of Innovative Dredging Technologies.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than June 1, 2001, the 
        Secretary shall complete a review of innovative 
        dredging technologies designed to minimize or eliminate 
        contamination of a water column upon removal of 
        contaminated sediments.
            (2) Testing.--
                    (A) Selection of technology.--After 
                completion of the review under paragraph (1), 
                the Secretary shall select, from among the 
                technologies reviewed, the technology that the 
                Secretary determines will best increase the 
                effectiveness of removing contaminated 
                sediments and significantly reduce 
                contamination of the water column.
                    (B) Agreement.--Not later than December 31, 
                2001, the Secretary shall enter into an 
                agreement with a public or private entity to 
                test the selected technology in the vicinity of 
                Peoria Lakes, Illinois.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
        subsection $2,000,000.
    (b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies.--
Section 8 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 
U.S.C. 2314) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 
        subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the 
        following:
    ``(b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies for 
Management of Contaminated Sediments.--
            ``(1) Test projects.--The Secretary shall approve 
        an appropriate number of projects to test, under actual 
        field conditions, innovative technologies for 
        environmentally sound management of contaminated 
        sediments.
            ``(2) Demonstration projects.--The Secretary may 
        approve an appropriate number of projects to 
        demonstrate innovative technologies that have been 
        pilot tested under paragraph (1).
            ``(3) Conduct of projects.--Each pilot project 
        under paragraph (1) and demonstration project under 
        paragraph (2) shall be conducted by a university with 
        proven expertise in the research and development of 
        contaminated sediment treatment technologies and 
        innovative applications using waste materials.
            ``(4) Location.--At least 1 of the projects under 
        this subsection shall be conducted in New England by 
        the University of New Hampshire.''.

SEC. 504. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to 
enhance dam safety at the following locations:
            (1) Healdsburg Veteran's Memorial Dam, California.
            (2) Kehly Run Dam, Pennsylvania.
            (3) Sweet Arrow Lake Dam, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $6,000,000.

SEC. 505. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS.

    Section 401(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (33 U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 110 Stat. 3763) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Contributions by entities.--Nonprofit 
                public or private entities may contribute all 
                or a portion of the non-Federal share.''.

SEC. 506. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``If the Secretary'' and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(1) In general.--If the Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Control of sea lamprey.--Congress finds 
        that--
                    ``(A) the Great Lakes navigation system has 
                been instrumental in the spread of sea lamprey 
                and the associated impacts on its fishery; and
                    ``(B) the use of the authority under this 
                subsection for control of sea lamprey at any 
                Great Lakes basin location is appropriate.''.

SEC. 507. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(12) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.
            ``(13) Contraband Bayou, Louisiana, as part of the 
        Calcasieu River and Pass Ship Channel.
            ``(14) Lake Wallula Navigation Channel, Washington.
            ``(15) Wadley Pass (also known as `McGriff Pass'), 
        Suwanee River, Florida.''.

SEC. 508. MEASUREMENTS OF LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSIONS, ILLINOIS.

    Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4253) is amended by striking ``$250,000 per 
fiscal year for each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 
1986,'' and inserting ``$1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 
1999 through 2003''.

SEC. 509. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Authorized Activities.--Section 1103(e) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended 
by striking ``(e)(1)'' and all that follows through the end of 
paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
    ``(e) Program Authority.--
            ``(1) Authority.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, in 
                consultation with the Secretary of the Interior 
                and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, 
                Missouri, and Wisconsin, may undertake, as 
                identified in the master plan--
                            ``(i) a program for the planning, 
                        construction, and evaluation of 
                        measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                        rehabilitation and enhancement; and
                            ``(ii) implementation of a long-
                        term resource monitoring, computerized 
                        data inventory and analysis, and 
                        applied research program.
                    ``(B) Advisory committee.--In carrying out 
                subparagraph (A)(i), the Secretary shall 
                establish an independent technical advisory 
                committee to review projects, monitoring plans, 
                and habitat and natural resource needs 
                assessments.''.
    (b) Reports.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by 
striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2004, 
        and not later than December 31 of every sixth year 
        thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, 
        Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, shall submit 
        to Congress a report that--
                    ``(A) contains an evaluation of the 
                programs described in paragraph (1);
                    ``(B) describes the accomplishments of each 
                of the programs;
                    ``(C) provides updates of a systemic 
                habitat needs assessment; and
                    ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in 
                the authorization of the programs.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 1103(e) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1)(A)'' and inserting 
                ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' 
                and all that follows before the period at the 
                end and inserting ``Secretary $22,750,000 for 
                fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year 
                thereafter'';
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1)(B)'' and inserting 
                ``(1)(A)(ii)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' 
                and all that follows before the period at the 
                end and inserting ``Secretary $10,420,000 for 
                fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year 
                thereafter''; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out paragraph 
        (1)(A)(i) $350,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 
        through 2009.''.
    (d) Transfer of Amounts.--Section 1103(e) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended 
by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:
            ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--For fiscal year 1999 
        and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary, in 
        consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the 
        States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and 
        Wisconsin, may transfer not to exceed 20 percent of the 
        amounts appropriated to carry out clause (i) or (ii) of 
        paragraph (1)(A) to the amounts appropriated to carry 
        out the other of those clauses.''.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--Section 1103(e)(7)(A) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(7)(A)) is 
amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``and, in the case of any project requiring non-
Federal cost sharing, the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 35 percent''.
    (f) Habitat Needs Assessment.--Section 1103(h)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(h)(2)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2) The Secretary'' and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(2) Determination.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Requirements.--The Secretary shall--
                            ``(i) complete the ongoing habitat 
                        needs assessment conducted under this 
                        paragraph not later than September 30, 
                        2000; and
                            ``(ii) include in each report under 
                        subsection (e)(2) the most recent 
                        habitat needs assessment conducted 
                        under this paragraph.''.
    (g) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1103 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(7)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 
                ``(1)(A)'' and inserting ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 
                ``paragraphs (1)(B) and (1)(C)'' and inserting 
                ``paragraph (1)(A)(ii)''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``(2)(A)'' and inserting 
                ``(2)''; and
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 510. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    Section 404(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended in the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``is'' and inserting ``are''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``1997'' the following: ``, 
        and an additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years 
        thereafter''.

SEC. 511. WATER CONTROL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--In evaluating potential improvements for 
water control management activities and consolidation of water 
control management centers, the Secretary may consider a 
regionalized water control management plan but may not 
implement such a plan until the date on which a report is 
submitted under subsection (b).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works and the Committee 
on Appropriations of the Senate a report containing--
            (1) a description of the primary objectives of 
        streamlining water control management activities;
            (2) a description of the benefits provided by 
        streamlining water control management activities 
        through consolidation of centers for those activities;
            (3) a determination whether the benefits to users 
        of establishing regional water control management 
        centers will be retained in each district office of the 
        Corps of Engineers that does not have a regional 
        center;
            (4) a determination whether users of regional 
        centers will receive a higher level of benefits from 
        streamlining water control management activities; and
            (5) a list of the members of Congress who represent 
        a district that includes a water control management 
        center that is to be eliminated under a proposed 
        regionalized plan.

SEC. 512. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    The Secretary may carry out the following projects under 
section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326):
            (1) Bodega bay, california.--A project to make 
        beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
        navigation project in Bodega Bay, California.
            (2) Sabine refuge, louisiana.--A project to make 
        beneficial use of dredged material from Federal 
        navigation projects in the vicinity of Sabine Refuge, 
        Louisiana.
            (3) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, 
        mississippi.--A project to make beneficial use of 
        dredged material from a Federal navigation project in 
        Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
            (4) Rose city marsh, orange county, texas.--A 
        project to make beneficial use of dredged material from 
        a Federal navigation project in Rose City Marsh, Orange 
        County, Texas.
            (5) Bessie heights marsh, orange county, texas.--A 
        project to make beneficial use of dredged material from 
        a Federal navigation project in Bessie Heights Marsh, 
        Orange County, Texas.

SEC. 513. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

    Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3758) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and 
inserting the following:
            ``(2) Expansion and improvement of Long Pine Run 
        Dam, Pennsylvania, and associated water infrastructure, 
        in accordance with subsections (b) through (e) of 
        section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1992 (106 Stat. 4845), at a total cost of 
        $20,000,000.''.

SEC. 514. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Middle mississippi river.--The term ``middle 
        Mississippi River'' means the reach of the Mississippi 
        River from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0, 
        upper Mississippi River) to the mouth of the Missouri 
        River (river mile 195).
            (2) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River'' 
        means the main stem and floodplain of the Missouri 
        River (including reservoirs) from its confluence with 
        the Mississippi River at St. Louis, Missouri, to its 
        headwaters near Three Forks, Montana.
            (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means the 
        project authorized by this section.
    (b) Protection and Enhancement Activities.--
            (1) Plan.--
                    (A) Development.--Not later than 180 days 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall develop a plan for a project to 
                protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat 
                of the Missouri River and the middle 
                Mississippi River.
                    (B) Activities.--
                            (i) In general.--The plan shall 
                        provide for such activities as are 
                        necessary to protect and enhance fish 
                        and wildlife habitat without adversely 
                        affecting--
                                    (I) the water-related needs 
                                of the region surrounding the 
                                Missouri River and the middle 
                                Mississippi River, including 
                                flood control, navigation, 
                                recreation, and enhancement of 
                                water supply; and
                                    (II) private property 
                                rights.
                            (ii) Required activities.--The plan 
                        shall include--
                                    (I) modification and 
                                improvement of navigation 
                                training structures to protect 
                                and enhance fish and wildlife 
                                habitat;
                                    (II) modification and 
                                creation of side channels to 
                                protect and enhance fish and 
                                wildlife habitat;
                                    (III) restoration and 
                                creation of island fish and 
                                wildlife habitat;
                                    (IV) creation of riverine 
                                fish and wildlife habitat;
                                    (V) establishment of 
                                criteria for prioritizing the 
                                type and sequencing of 
                                activities based on cost-
                                effectiveness and likelihood of 
                                success; and
                                    (VI) physical and 
                                biological monitoring for 
                                evaluating the success of the 
                                project, to be performed by the 
                                River Studies Center of the 
                                United States Geological Survey 
                                in Columbia, Missouri.
            (2) Implementation of activities.--
                    (A) In general.--Using funds made available 
                to carry out this section, the Secretary shall 
                carry out the activities described in the plan.
                    (B) Use of existing authority for 
                unconstructed features of the project.--Using 
                funds made available to the Secretary under 
                other law, the Secretary shall design and 
                construct any feature of the project that may 
                be carried out using the authority of the 
                Secretary to modify an authorized project, if 
                the Secretary determines that the design and 
                construction will--
                            (i) accelerate the completion of 
                        activities to protect and enhance fish 
                        and wildlife habitat of the Missouri 
                        River or the middle Mississippi River; 
                        and
                            (ii) be compatible with the project 
                        purposes described in this section.
    (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the activities 
        described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
        integrate the activities with other Federal, State, and 
        tribal activities.
            (2) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers 
        any new regulatory authority on any Federal or non-
        Federal entity that carries out any activity authorized 
        by this section.
    (d) Public Participation.--In developing and carrying out 
the plan and the activities described in subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall provide for public review and comment in 
accordance with applicable Federal law, including--
            (1) providing advance notice of meetings;
            (2) providing adequate opportunity for public input 
        and comment;
            (3) maintaining appropriate records; and
            (4) compiling a record of the proceedings of 
        meetings.
    (e) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the 
plan and the activities described in subsections (b) and (c), 
the Secretary shall comply with any applicable Federal law, 
including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (f) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the project shall be 35 percent.
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of any 1 activity described in subsection (b) shall not 
        exceed $5,000,000.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and 
        maintenance of the project shall be a non-Federal 
        responsibility.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of 
carrying out this section $30,000,000 for the period of fiscal 
years 2000 and 2001.

SEC. 515. IRRIGATION DIVERSION PROTECTION AND FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT 
                    ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical 
planning and design assistance to non-Federal interests and may 
conduct other site-specific studies to formulate and evaluate 
fish screens, fish passages devices, and other measures to 
decrease the incidence of juvenile and adult fish inadvertently 
entering irrigation systems.
    (b) Cooperation.--Measures under subsection (a)--
            (1) shall be developed in cooperation with Federal 
        and State resource agencies; and
            (2) shall not impair the continued withdrawal of 
        water for irrigation purposes.
    (c) Priority.--In providing assistance under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall give priority based on--
            (1) the objectives of the Endangered Species Act of 
        1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
            (2) cost-effectiveness; and
            (3) the potential for reducing fish mortality.
    (d) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of measures under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
            (2) In-kind contributions.--Not more than 50 
        percent of the non-Federal contribution may be made 
        through the provision of services, materials, supplies, 
        or other in-kind contributions.
    (e) No Construction Activity.--This section does not 
authorize any construction activity.
    (f) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on--
            (1) fish mortality caused by irrigation water 
        intake devices;
            (2) appropriate measures to reduce fish mortality;
            (3) the extent to which those measures are 
        currently being employed in arid States;
            (4) the construction costs associated with those 
        measures; and
            (5) the appropriate Federal role, if any, to 
        encourage the use of those measures.

SEC. 516. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR WATERSHED RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall examine using, and, if appropriate, 
encourage the use of, innovative treatment technologies, 
including membrane technologies, for watershed and 
environmental restoration and protection projects involving 
water quality.

SEC. 517. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports for 
the following projects and, if justified, proceed directly to 
project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
            (1) Sluice Creek, Guilford, Connecticut, and 
        Lighthouse Point Park, New Haven, Connecticut.
            (2) Alafia Channel, Tampa Harbor, Florida, project 
        for navigation.
            (3) Little Calumet River, Indiana.
            (4) Ohio River Greenway, Indiana, project for 
        environmental restoration and recreation.
            (5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, 
        Louisiana, project for waterfront and riverine 
        preservation, restoration, and enhancement 
        modifications.
            (6) Extension of locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on 
        the upper Mississippi River and the La Grange and 
        Peoria locks on the Illinois River, project to provide 
        lock chambers 110 feet in width and 1,200 feet in 
        length.

SEC. 518. DOG RIVER, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary shall provide $1,500,000 for environmental 
restoration for a pilot project, in cooperation with non-
Federal interests, to restore natural water depths in the Dog 
River, Alabama.

SEC. 519. LEVEES IN ELBA AND GENEVA, ALABAMA.

    (a) Elba, Alabama.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and 
        rehabilitate a levee in the city of Elba, Alabama, at a 
        total cost of $12,900,000.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of repair and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) 
        shall be 35 percent.
    (b) Geneva, Alabama.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and 
        rehabilitate a levee in the city of Geneva, Alabama, at 
        a total cost of $16,600,000.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of repair and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) 
        shall be 35 percent.

SEC. 520. NAVAJO RESERVATION, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH.

    (a) In General.--In cooperation with other appropriate 
Federal and local agencies, the Secretary shall undertake a 
survey of, and provide technical, planning, and design 
assistance for, watershed management, restoration, and 
development on the Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona, New 
Mexico, and Utah.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of 
activities carried out under this section shall be 75 percent. 
Funds made available under the Indian Self-Determination and 
Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) may be used by 
the Navajo Nation in meeting the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the activities.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 521. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS, WATER SUPPLY STORAGE REALLOCATION.

    The Secretary shall reallocate approximately 31,000 
additional acre-feet at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, to water supply 
storage at no cost to the Beaver Water District or the Carroll-
Boone Water District, except that at no time shall the bottom 
of the conservation pool be at an elevation that is less than 
1,076 feet, NGVD.

SEC. 522. BEAVER LAKE TROUT PRODUCTION FACILITY, ARKANSAS.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary, in conjunction with the State of Arkansas, 
shall prepare a plan for the mitigation of effects of the 
Beaver Dam project on Beaver Lake, including the benefits of 
and schedule for construction of the Beaver Lake trout 
production facility and related facilities.

SEC. 523. CHINO DAIRY PRESERVE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary, in coordination 
with the heads of other Federal agencies, shall provide 
technical assistance to State and local agencies in the study, 
design, and implementation of measures for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration and protection in the 
Santa Ana River watershed, California, with particular emphasis 
on structural and nonstructural measures in the vicinity of the 
Chino Dairy Preserve.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
activities assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
feasibility study to determine the most cost-effective plan for 
flood damage reduction and environmental restoration and 
protection in the vicinity of the Chino Dairy Preserve, Santa 
Ana River watershed, Orange County and San Bernardino County, 
California.

SEC. 524. ORANGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with local 
governments, may prepare special area management plans for 
Orange and San Diego Counties, California, to demonstrate the 
effectiveness of using the plans to provide information 
regarding aquatic resources.
    (b) Use of Plans.--The Secretary may--
            (1) use plans described in subsection (a) in making 
        regulatory decisions; and
            (2) issue permits consistent with the plans.

SEC. 525. RUSH CREEK, NOVATO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood control 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s) at Rush Creek, Novato, California, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 526. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary may--
            (1) modify the cooperative agreement with the Santa 
        Cruz Port District, California, to reflect 
        unanticipated additional dredging effort; and
            (2) extend the agreement for 10 years.

SEC. 527. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    (a) Computer Model.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may apply the 
        computer model developed under the St. Johns River 
        basin feasibility study to assist non-Federal interests 
        in developing strategies for improving water quality in 
        the Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of activities assisted under paragraph (1) shall 
        be 50 percent.
    (b) Topographic Survey.--The Secretary may provide 1-foot 
contour topographic survey maps of the Lower St. Johns River 
basin, Florida, to non-Federal interests for analyzing 
environmental data and establishing benchmarks for subbasins.

SEC. 528. MAYO'S BAR LOCK AND DAM, COOSA RIVER, ROME, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical 
assistance (including planning, engineering, and design 
assistance) for the reconstruction of the Mayo's Bar Lock and 
Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of activities assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 
percent.

SEC. 529. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT RESPONSE MODELING SYSTEM, 
                    CORALVILLE RESERVOIR AND IOWA RIVER WATERSHED, 
                    IOWA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
University of Iowa, shall conduct a study and develop a 
comprehensive flood impact response modeling system for 
Coralville Reservoir and the Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
    (b) Study.--The study shall include--
            (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic, 
        geomorphic, environmental, economic, social, and 
        recreational impacts of operating strategies within the 
        watershed;
            (2) creation of an integrated, dynamic flood impact 
        model; and
            (3) the development of a rapid response system to 
        be used during flood and emergency situations.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 5 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a 
report to Congress on the results of the study and modeling 
system and such recommendations as the Secretary determines to 
be appropriate.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 530. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE IN ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary may carry out the project for Georgetown, 
Illinois, and the project for Olney, Illinois, referred to in 
House Report Number 104-741, accompanying the Safe Drinking 
Water Act Amendments of 1996 (Public Law 104-182).

SEC. 531. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.

    (a) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall offer to the State 
of Kansas the right to purchase water storage in Kanopolis 
Lake, Kansas, at the average of--
            (1) the cost calculated in accordance with the 
        terms of the memorandum of understanding entitled 
        ``Memorandum of Understanding Between the State of 
        Kansas and the U.S. Department of the Army Concerning 
        the Purchase of Municipal and Industrial Water Supply 
        Storage'', dated December 11, 1985; and
            (2) the cost calculated in accordance with 
        procedures established as of the date of enactment of 
        this Act by the Secretary to determine the cost of 
        water storage at other projects under the Secretary's 
        jurisdiction.
    (b) Effective Date.--For the purposes of this section, the 
effective date of the memorandum of understanding referred to 
in subsection (a)(1) shall be deemed to be the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 532. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3773) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``and surface'' and 
                inserting ``surface''; and
                    (B) by striking ``development.'' and 
                inserting ``development, and small stream 
                flooding, local storm water drainage, and 
                related problems.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following: ``Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
        any project undertaken under this section, with the 
        consent of the affected local government, a non-Federal 
        interest may include a nonprofit entity.''; and
            (3) in subsection (h), by striking ``$10,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 533. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

    Section 533(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3775) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' 
and inserting ``$250,000,000''.

SEC. 534. SNUG HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, may--
            (1) provide technical assistance to the residents 
        of Snug Harbor, in the vicinity of Berlin, Maryland, 
        for the purpose of flood damage reduction;
            (2) conduct a study of a project consisting of 
        nonstructural measures for flood damage reduction in 
        the vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland, taking into 
        account the relationship of both the Ocean City Inlet 
        and Assateague Island to the flooding; and
            (3) after completion of the study, carry out the 
        project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) FEMA Assistance.--The Director, in coordination with 
the Secretary and under the authorities of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), may provide technical assistance and 
nonstructural measures for flood damage mitigation in the 
vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of assistance under this section shall not exceed 
        $3,000,000.
            (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of assistance under this section shall be 
        determined in accordance with title I of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et 
        seq.) or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
        Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as 
        appropriate.

SEC. 535. WELCH POINT, ELK RIVER, CECIL COUNTY, AND CHESAPEAKE CITY, 
                    MARYLAND.

    (a) Spillage of Dredged Materials.--The Secretary shall 
carry out a study to determine whether the spillage of dredged 
materials that were removed as part of the project for 
navigation, Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake 
Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of 
the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1030, chapter 831), is a 
significant impediment to vessels transiting the Elk River near 
Welch Point, Maryland. If the Secretary determines that the 
spillage is an impediment to navigation, the Secretary may 
conduct such dredging as may be required to permit navigation 
on the river.
    (b) Damage to Water Supply.--The Secretary shall carry out 
a study to determine whether additional compensation is 
required to fully compensate the city of Chesapeake, Maryland, 
for damage to the city's water supply resulting from dredging 
of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal project. If the Secretary 
determines that such additional compensation is required, the 
Secretary may provide the compensation to the city of 
Chesapeake.

SEC. 536. CAPE COD CANAL RAILROAD BRIDGE, BUZZARDS BAY, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) Alternative Transportation.--The Secretary may provide 
up to $300,000 for meeting the need for alternative 
transportation that may arise as a result of the operation, 
maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of the Cape Cod Canal 
Railroad Bridge.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Contract Renegotiation.--Not 
later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall enter into negotiation with the owner of the 
railroad right-of-way for the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge 
for the purpose of establishing the rights and responsibilities 
for the operation and maintenance of the Bridge. The Secretary 
may include in any new contract the termination of the prior 
contract numbered ER-W175-ENG-1.

SEC. 537. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary, in consultation 
with local officials, shall conduct a demonstration project to 
improve water quality in the vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $1,700,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 538. BEAVER BRANCH OF BIG TIMBER CREEK, NEW JERSEY.

    At the request of the State of New Jersey or a political 
subdivision of the State, using authority under law in effect 
on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may--
            (1) compile and disseminate information on floods 
        and flood damage, including identification of areas 
        subject to inundation by floods; and
            (2) provide technical assistance regarding 
        floodplain management for the Beaver Branch of Big 
        Timber Creek, New Jersey.

SEC. 539. LAKE ONTARIO AND ST. LAWRENCE RIVER WATER LEVELS, NEW YORK.

    On request, the Secretary may provide technical assistance 
to the International Joint Commission and the St. Lawrence 
River Board of Control in undertaking studies on the effects of 
fluctuating water levels on the natural environment, 
recreational boating, property flooding, and erosion along the 
shorelines of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River in New 
York. The Commission and the Board are encouraged to conduct 
such studies in a comprehensive and thorough manner before 
implementing any change to Water Regulation Plan 1958-D.

SEC. 540. NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
analyze the economic and environmental benefits and costs of 
potential sediment management and contaminant reduction 
measures.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with non-
Federal interests to investigate, develop, and support measures 
for sediment management and reduction of sources of contaminant 
that affect navigation in the Port of New York-New Jersey and 
the environmental conditions of the New York-New Jersey Harbor 
estuary.

SEC. 541. SEA GATE REACH, CONEY ISLAND, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary may construct a project for shoreline 
protection that includes a beachfill with revetment and T-groin 
for the Sea Gate Reach on Coney Island, New York, as identified 
in the March 1998 report prepared for the Corps of Engineers, 
New York District, entitled ``Field Data Gathering, Project 
Performance Analysis and Design Alternative Solutions to 
Improve Sandfill Retention'', at a total cost of $9,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $5,850,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $3,150,000.

SEC. 542. WOODLAWN, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide planning, 
design, and other technical assistance to non-Federal interests 
for identifying and mitigating sources of contamination at 
Woodlawn Beach in Woodlawn, New York.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

SEC. 543. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
inundation areas in the State of New York.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
accurately show the flood inundation of each property by flood 
risk in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a high 
resolution format and shall be made available to all flood 
prone areas in the State of New York in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
Federal interests for the project shall work with the Director 
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure the 
validity of the maps developed under the project for flood 
insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 544. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OTTAWA COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary may provide technical assistance for the 
removal of military ordnance from the Toussaint River, Carroll 
Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.

SEC. 545. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State 
of Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, determined 
under subsection (b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the water 
supply cost obligation of the State under Contract No. DACW56-
74-JC-0314 for water supply storage at Sardis Reservoir, 
Oklahoma.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the 
State of Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to 
adjustment in accordance with accepted discount purchase 
methods for Federal Government properties as determined by an 
independent accounting firm designated by the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget. The cost of the determination 
shall be paid for by the State of Oklahoma or an agent of the 
State.
    (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section affects any of the 
rights or obligations of the parties to the contract referred 
to in subsection (a).

SEC. 546. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
south bank of the Willamette River, in the area of Skinner 
Butte Park from Ferry Street Bridge to the Valley River 
footbridge, to determine the feasibility of carrying out a 
project to stabilize the river bank, and to restore and enhance 
riverine habitat, using a combination of structural and 
bioengineering techniques.
    (b) Federal Participation.--If, on completion of the study, 
the Secretary determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified, the 
Secretary may participate with non-Federal interests in the 
project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 35 percent.
    (d) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        provide land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, 
        and dredged material disposal areas necessary for 
        construction of the project.
            (2) Credit toward non-federal share.--The value of 
        the land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
        dredged material disposal areas provided by the non-
        Federal interests shall be credited toward the non-
        Federal share.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the 
period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 547. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, and the heads of other 
appropriate Federal agencies shall, using authorities under law 
in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, assist the 
State of Oregon in developing and implementing a comprehensive 
basin-wide strategy in the Willamette River basin, Oregon, for 
coordinated and integrated management of land and water 
resources to improve water quality, reduce flood hazards, 
ensure sustainable economic activity, and restore habitat for 
native fish and wildlife.
    (b) Technical Assistance, Staff, and Financial Support.--
The heads of the Federal agencies may provide technical 
assistance, staff, and financial support for development of the 
basin-wide management strategy.
    (c) Flexibility.--The heads of the Federal agencies shall 
exercise flexibility to reduce barriers to efficient and 
effective implementation of the basin-wide management strategy.

SEC. 548. BRADFORD AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may provide assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development projects in Bradford and Sullivan Counties, 
Pennsylvania, using the funds and authorities provided in title 
I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999 
(Public Law 105-245), under the heading ``Construction, 
General'' (112 Stat. 1840) for similar projects in Lackawanna, 
Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, and Monroe Counties, 
Pennsylvania.

SEC. 549. ERIE HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may reimburse the appropriate non-Federal 
interest not more than $78,366 for architectural and 
engineering costs incurred in connection with the Erie Harbor 
basin navigation project, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 550. POINT MARION LOCK AND DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Point Marion 
Lock and Dam, borough of Point Marion, Pennsylvania, authorized 
by section 301(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4110), is modified to direct the Secretary, in 
the operation and maintenance of the project, to mitigate 
damages to the shoreline, at a total cost of $2,000,000.
    (b) Allocation.--The cost of the mitigation shall be 
allocated as an operation and maintenance cost of a Federal 
navigation project.

SEC. 551. SEVEN POINTS' HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may, at full Federal 
expense, construct a breakwater at the entrance to Seven 
Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Costs.--All operation and 
maintenance costs associated with the facility constructed 
under this section shall be the responsibility of the lessee of 
the marina complex at Seven Points' Harbor.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $850,000.

SEC. 552. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 566(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3786) is amended by inserting ``environmental 
restoration,'' after ``water supply and related facilities,''.

SEC. 553. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA-LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA, WATERSHED 
                    MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of a comprehensive floodplain 
management and watershed restoration project for the Upper 
Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Geographic Information System.--In conducting the 
study, the Secretary shall use a geographic information system.
    (c) Plans.--The study shall formulate plans for 
comprehensive floodplain management and environmental 
restoration.
    (d) Credit Toward Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal interests 
may receive credit toward the non-Federal share for in-kind 
services and materials that contribute to the study. The 
Secretary may credit non-Corps Federal assistance provided to 
the non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of the 
costs of the study to the maximum extent authorized by law.

SEC. 554. AGUADILLA HARBOR, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether 
erosion and additional storm damage risks that exist in the 
vicinity of Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico, are the result of a 
Federal navigation project. If the Secretary determines that 
such erosion and additional storm damage risks are the result 
of the project, the Secretary shall take appropriate measures 
to mitigate the erosion and storm damage.

SEC. 555. OAHE DAM TO LAKE SHARPE, SOUTH DAKOTA, STUDY.

    Section 441 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3747) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) Investigation.--'' before 
        ``The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 1999, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the investigation under this section. The report shall include 
the examination of financing options for regular maintenance 
and preservation of the lake. The report shall be prepared in 
coordination and cooperation with the Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, other Federal agencies, and State and 
local officials.''.

SEC. 556. NORTH PADRE ISLAND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL 
                    RESTORATION PROJECT.

    The Secretary is directed to carry out a project for 
ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction at North Padre 
Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, at a total estimated cost of 
$30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000, if the Secretary 
determines that the work is technically sound and 
environmentally acceptable. The Secretary shall make such a 
determination not later than 270 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 557. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The projects described in the following reports are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, 
recommended in the reports, and subject to a favorable report 
of the Chief of Engineers:
            (1) Parkersburg, west virginia.--Report of the 
        Corps of Engineers entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna 
        Riverfront Park Feasibility Study'', dated June 1998, 
        at a total cost of $8,400,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $4,200,000, and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $4,200,000.
            (2) Weirton, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
        Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for 
        Weirton Port and Industrial Center, West Virginia 
        Public Port Authority'', dated December 1997, at a 
        total cost of $18,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $9,000,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $9,000,000.
            (3) Erickson/wood county, west virginia.--Report of 
        the Corps of Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master 
        Plan for Erickson/Wood County Port District, West 
        Virginia Public Port Authority'', dated July 7, 1997, 
        at a total cost of $28,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $14,000,000, and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $14,000,000.

SEC. 558. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    Section 8 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702h; 45 
Stat. 537, chapter 569) (commonly known as the ``Flood Control 
Act of 1928)''), is amended by striking ``$7,500'' and 
inserting ``$21,500''.

SEC. 559. COASTAL AQUATIC HABITAT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with the 
Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior, the Administrators 
of the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration, other appropriate Federal, 
State, and local agencies, and affected private entities, in 
the development of a management strategy to address problems 
associated with toxic microorganisms and the resulting 
degradation of ecosystems in the tidal and nontidal wetlands 
and waters of the United States.
    (b) Assistance.--As part of the management strategy, the 
Secretary may provide planning, design, and other technical 
assistance to each participating State in the development and 
implementation of nonregulatory measures to mitigate 
environmental problems and restore aquatic resources.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of 
measures undertaken under this section shall not exceed 65 
percent.
    (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000 for the 
period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 560. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, 
planning, and design assistance to Federal and non-Federal 
interests for carrying out projects to address water quality 
problems caused by drainage and related activities from 
abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under 
subsection (a) may be in support of projects for the purposes 
of--
            (1) managing drainage from abandoned and inactive 
        noncoal mines;
            (2) restoring and protecting streams, rivers, 
        wetlands, other waterbodies, and riparian areas 
        degraded by drainage from abandoned and inactive 
        noncoal mines; and
            (3) demonstrating management practices and 
        innovative and alternative treatment technologies to 
        minimize or eliminate adverse environmental effects 
        associated with drainage from abandoned and inactive 
        noncoal mines.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of assistance under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent, except 
that the Federal share with respect to projects located on land 
owned by the United States shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--
Nothing in this section affects the authority of the Secretary 
of the Interior under titleIV of the Surface Mining Control and 
Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.).
    (e) Technology Database for Reclamation of Abandoned 
Mines.--The Secretary may provide assistance to non-Federal and 
nonprofit entities to develop, manage, and maintain a database 
of conventional and innovative, cost-effective technologies for 
reclamation of abandoned and inactive noncoal mine sites. Such 
assistance shall be provided through the Rehabilitation of 
Abandoned Mine Sites Program managed by the Sacramento District 
Office of the Corps of Engineers.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 561. BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE TIRE RUBBER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall, when appropriate, 
encourage the beneficial use of waste tire rubber (including 
crumb rubber and baled tire products) recycled from tires.
    (b) Included Beneficial Uses.--Beneficial uses under 
subsection (a) may include marine pilings, underwater framing, 
floating docks with built-in flotation, utility poles, and 
other uses associated with transportation and infrastructure 
projects receiving Federal funds.
    (c) Use of Waste Tire Rubber.--The Secretary shall 
encourage the use, when appropriate, of waste tire rubber 
(including crumb rubber) in projects described in subsection 
(b).

SEC. 562. SITE DESIGNATION.

    Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended in 
the third sentence by striking ``January 1, 2000'' and 
inserting ``January 1, 2003''.

SEC. 563. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Toronto Lake and El Dorado Lake, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the 
        State of Kansas, by quitclaim deed and without 
        consideration, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to the 2 parcels of land described 
        in paragraph (2) on which correctional facilities 
        operated by the Kansas Department of Corrections are 
        situated.
            (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred 
        to in paragraph (1) are--
                    (A) the parcel located in Butler County, 
                Kansas, adjacent to the El Dorado Lake Project, 
                consisting of approximately 32.98 acres; and
                    (B) the parcel located in Woodson County, 
                Kansas, adjacent to the Toronto Lake Project, 
                consisting of approximately 51.98 acres.
            (3) Conditions.--
                    (A) Use of land.--A conveyance of a parcel 
                under paragraph (1) shall be subject to the 
                condition that all right, title, and interest 
                in and to the parcel shall revert to the United 
                States if the parcel is used for a purpose 
                other than that of a correctional facility.
                    (B) Costs.--The Secretary may require such 
                additional terms, conditions, reservations, and 
                restrictions in connection with the conveyance 
                as the Secretary determines are necessary to 
                protect the interests of the United States, 
                including a requirement that the State pay all 
                reasonable administrative costs associated with 
                the conveyance.
    (b) Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and 
        (4), at such time as Holnam Inc. conveys all right, 
        title, and interest in and to the parcel of land 
        described in paragraph (2)(A) to the United States, the 
        Secretary shall convey all right, title, and interest 
        in the parcel of land described in paragraph (2)(B) to 
        Holnam Inc.
            (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred 
        to in paragraph (1) are the following:
                    (A) Non-federal land.--152.45 acres with 
                existing flowage easements situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, described as a portion of 
                Government Tract Number FM-9 and all of 
                Government Tract Numbers FM-11, FM-10, FM-12, 
                FM-13, and FM-16, owned and administered by 
                Holnam Inc.
                    (B) Federal land.--152.61 acres situated in 
                Pike County, Missouri, known as Government 
                Tract Numbers FM-17 and a portion of FM-18, 
                administered by the Corps of Engineers.
            (3) Conditions.--The exchange of land under 
        paragraph (1) shall be subject to the following 
        conditions:
                    (A) Deeds.--
                            (i) Non-federal land.--The 
                        conveyance of the land described in 
                        paragraph (2)(A) to the Secretary shall 
                        be by a warranty deed acceptable to the 
                        Secretary.
                            (ii) Federal land.--The instrument 
                        of conveyance used to convey the land 
                        described in paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam 
                        Inc. shall contain such reservations, 
                        terms, and conditions as the Secretary 
                        considers necessary to allow the United 
                        States to operate and maintain the 
                        Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation 
                        Project.
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--Holnam Inc. 
                may remove any improvements on the land 
                described in paragraph (2)(A). The Secretary 
                may require Holnam Inc. to remove any 
                improvements on the land described in paragraph 
                (2)(A). In either case, Holnam Inc. shall hold 
                the United States harmless from liability, and 
                the United States shall not incur cost 
                associated with the removal or relocation of 
                any of the improvements.
                    (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land 
                exchange under paragraph (1) shall be completed 
                not later than 2 years after the date of 
                enactment of this Act.
                    (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall 
                provide the legal description of the land 
                described in paragraph (2). The legal 
                description shall be used in the instruments of 
                conveyance of the land.
                    (E) Administrative costs.--The Secretary 
                shall require Holnam Inc. to pay reasonable 
                administrative costs associated with the 
                exchange.
            (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair 
        market value, as determined by the Secretary, of the 
        land conveyed to Holnam Inc. by the Secretary under 
        paragraph (1) exceeds the appraised fair market value, 
        as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed to 
        the United States by Holnam Inc. under paragraph (1), 
        Holnam Inc. shall make a payment equal to the excess in 
        cash or a cash equivalent to the United States.
    (c) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    (A) Fair market value.--The term ``fair 
                market value'' means the amount for which a 
                willing buyer would purchase and a willing 
                seller would sell a parcel of land, as 
                determined by a qualified, independent land 
                appraiser.
                    (B) Previous owner of land.--The term 
                ``previous owner of land'' means a person 
                (including a corporation) that conveyed, or a 
                descendant of a deceased individual who 
                conveyed, land to the Corps of Engineers for 
                use in the Candy Lake project in Osage County, 
                Oklahoma.
            (2) Conveyances.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall convey 
                all right, title, and interest of the United 
                States in and to the land acquired by the 
                United States for the Candy Lake project in 
                Osage County, Oklahoma.
                    (B) Previous owners of land.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary 
                        shall give a previous owner of land the 
                        first option to purchase the land 
                        described in subparagraph (A).
                            (ii) Application.--
                                    (I) In general.--A previous 
                                owner of land that desires to 
                                purchase the land described in 
                                paragraph (1) that was owned by 
                                the previous owner of land, or 
                                by the individual from whom the 
                                previous owner of land is 
                                descended, shall file an 
                                application to purchase the 
                                land with the Secretary not 
                                later than 180 days after the 
                                official date of notice to the 
                                previous owner of land under 
                                paragraph (3).
                                    (II) First to file has 
                                first option.--If more than 1 
                                application is filed to 
                                purchase a parcel of land 
                                described in subparagraph (A), 
                                the first option to purchase 
                                the parcel of land shall be 
                                determined in the order in 
                                which applications for the 
                                parcel of land were filed.
                            (iii) Identification of previous 
                        owners of land.--As soon as practicable 
                        after the date of enactment of this 
                        Act, the Secretary shall, to the extent 
                        practicable, identify each previous 
                        owner of land.
                            (iv) Consideration.--Consideration 
                        for land conveyed under this subsection 
                        shall be the fair market value of the 
                        land.
                    (C) Disposal.--Any land described in 
                subparagraph (A) for which an application to 
                purchase the land has not been filed under 
                subparagraph (B)(ii) within the applicable time 
                period shall be disposed of in accordance with 
                law.
                    (D) Extinguishment of easements.--All 
                flowage easements acquired by the United States 
                for use in the Candy Lake project in Osage 
                County, Oklahoma, are extinguished.
            (3) Notice.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                notify--
                            (i) each person identified as a 
                        previous owner of land under paragraph 
                        (2)(B)(iii), not later than 90 days 
                        after identification, by United States 
                        mail; and
                            (ii) the general public, not later 
                        than 90 days after the date of 
                        enactment of this Act, by publication 
                        in the Federal Register.
                    (B) Contents of notice.--Notice under this 
                paragraph shall include--
                            (i) a copy of this subsection;
                            (ii) information sufficient to 
                        separately identify each parcel of land 
                        subject to this subsection; and
                            (iii) specification of the fair 
                        market value of each parcel of land 
                        subject to this subsection.
                    (C) Official date of notice.--The official 
                date of notice under this subsection shall be 
                the later of--
                            (i) the date on which actual notice 
                        is mailed; or
                            (ii) the date of publication of the 
                        notice in the Federal Register.
    (d) Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, Area Land Conveyance.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        convey at fair market value to Choctaw County 
        Industrial Authority, Oklahoma, the parcels of land 
        described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Land description.--
                    (A) In general.--The parcel of land to be 
                conveyed under paragraph (1) is the parcel 
                lying above elevation 445.2 feet (NGVD) located 
                in the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ and the S\1/2\SW\1/
                4\ of Section 13 and the N\1/2\NW\1/4\ of 
                Section 24, T 6 S, R 18 E, of the Indian 
                Meridian, in Choctaw County, Oklahoma, the 
                parcel also being part of the Sawyer Bluff 
                Public Use Area and including parts of Hugo 
                Lake Tracts 134 and 139, and more particularly 
                described as follows: Beginning at a point on 
                the east line of Section 13, the point being 
                100.00 feet north of the southeast corner of 
                S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; thence S 01+ 
                36, 24" 100.00 to a Corps of Engineers brass-
                capped monument at the southeast corner of S\1/
                2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; thence S 88+ 16, 
                57" W, along the south line of the S\1/2\N\1/
                2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or 
                less, to a Corps of Engineers brass-capped 
                monument on the centerline of Section 13; 
                thence S 01+ 20, 53" E, along the centerline of 
                Section 13, 1316.632 feet to a Corps of 
                Engineers brass-capped monument; thence S 00+ 
                41, 35" E, along the centerline of Section 24, 
                1000.00 feet, more or a less, to a point lying 
                50.00 feet north and 300.00 feet, more or less, 
                east of Road B of the Sawyer Bluff Public Use 
                Area; thence westerly and northwesterly, 
                parallel to Road B, to the approximate location 
                of the 445.2-foot contour; thence meandering 
northerly along the 445.2-foot contour to a point approximately 100.00 
feet west and 100.00 feet north of the southwest corner of the S\1/
2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; thence east, paralleling the south line 
of the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or less, 
to the point of beginning.
                    (B) Survey.--The exact description and 
                acreage of the parcel shall be determined by a 
                metes and bounds survey provided by the Choctaw 
                County Industrial Authority.
    (e) Conveyance of Property in Marshall County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the 
        State of Oklahoma all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to real property located in 
        Marshall County, Oklahoma, and included in the Lake 
        Texoma (Denison Dam), Oklahoma and Texas, project, 
        consisting of approximately 1,580 acres and leased to 
        the State of Oklahoma for public park and recreation 
        purposes.
            (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the 
        conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be the fair market 
        value of the real property, as determined by the 
        Secretary. All costs associated with the conveyance 
        under paragraph (1) shall be paid by the State of 
        Oklahoma.
            (3) Description.--The exact acreage and legal 
        description of the real property to be conveyed under 
        paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey 
        satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey 
        shall be paid by the State of Oklahoma.
            (4) Environmental compliance.--Before making the 
        conveyance under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) conduct an environmental baseline 
                survey to determine whether there are levels of 
                contamination for which the United States would 
                be responsible under the Comprehensive 
                Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
                Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.); 
                and
                    (B) ensure that the conveyance complies 
                with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
                1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
            (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance 
        under paragraph (1) shall be subject to such other 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate to protect the interests of the United 
        States, including reservation by the United States of a 
        flowage easement over all portions of the real property 
        to be conveyed that are at or below elevation 645.0 
        NGVD.
    (f) Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        transfer to the Summerfield Cemetery Association, 
        Oklahoma, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to the land described in paragraph (3) 
        for use as a cemetery.
            (2) Reversion.--If the land to be transferred under 
        this subsection ever ceases to be used as a not-for-
        profit cemetery or for another public purpose, the land 
        shall revert to the United States.
            (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under 
        this subsection is the approximately 10 acres of land 
        located in Leflore County, Oklahoma, and described as 
        follows:


                         indian basin meridian


              Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 23 East

            SW SE SW NW
            NW NE NW SW
            N\1/2\ SW SW NW.
            (4) Consideration.--The conveyance under this 
        subsection shall be without consideration. All costs 
        associated with the conveyance shall be paid by the 
        Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma.
            (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance 
        under this subsection shall be subject to such other 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        necessary to protect the interests of the United 
        States.
    (g) Dexter, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the 
        Dexter Sanitary District all right, title, and interest 
        of the United States in and to a parcel of land 
        consisting of approximately 5 acres located at Dexter 
        Lake, Oregon, under lease to the Dexter Sanitary 
        District.
            (2) Consideration.--Land to be conveyed under this 
        subsection shall be conveyed without consideration. If 
        the land is no longer held in public ownership or no 
        longer used for wastewater treatment purposes, title to 
        the land shall revert to the Secretary.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the 
        United States shall be subject to such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
        protect the interests of the United States.
            (4) Surveys.--The exact acreage and description of 
        the land to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be 
        determined by such surveys as the Secretary considers 
        necessary. The cost of the surveys shall be borne by 
        the Dexter Sanitary District.
    (h) Charleston, South Carolina.--The Secretary may convey 
the property of the Corps of Engineers known as the ``Equipment 
and Storage Yard'', located on Meeting Street in Charleston, 
South Carolina, in as-is condition for fair market value, with 
all proceeds from the conveyance to be applied by the Corps of 
Engineers, Charleston District, to offset a portion of the 
costs of moving or leasing an office facility in the city of 
Charleston, South Carolina.
    (i) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
            (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in 
        this subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the 
        State of South Carolina all right, title, and interest 
        of the United States in and to the parcels of land 
        described in paragraph (2)(A) that are being managed, 
        as of the date of enactment of this Act, by the South 
        Carolina Department of Natural Resources for fish and 
        wildlife mitigation purposes for the Richard B. Russell 
        Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project authorized by 
        section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 
        1420) and modified by section 601(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4140).
            (2) Land description.--
                    (A) In general.--The parcels of land to be 
                conveyed are described in Exhibits A, F, and H 
                of Army Lease No. DACW21-1-93-0910 and 
                associated supplemental agreements or are 
                designated in red in Exhibit A of Army License 
                No. DACW21-3-85-1904, excluding all designated 
                parcels in the license that are below elevation 
                346 feet mean sea level or that are less than 
                300 feet measured horizontally from the top of 
                the power pool.
                    (B) Management of excluded parcels.--
                Management of the excluded parcels shall 
                continue in accordance with the terms of Army 
                License No. DACW21-3-85-1904 until the 
                Secretary and the State enter into an agreement 
                under paragraph (6).
                    (C) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal 
                description of the land shall be determined by 
                a survey satisfactory to the Secretary, with 
                the cost of the survey borne by the State.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--The State shall be 
        responsible for all costs, including real estate 
        transaction and environmental compliance costs, 
        associated with the conveyance.
            (4) Perpetual status.--
                    (A) In general.--All land conveyed under 
                this subsection shall be retained in public 
                ownership and shall be managed in perpetuity 
                for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in 
                accordance with a plan approved by the 
                Secretary.
                    (B) Reversion.--If any parcel of land is 
                not managed for fish and wildlife mitigation 
                purposes in accordance with the plan, title to 
                the parcel shall revert to the United States.
            (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary 
        may require such additional terms and conditions in 
        connection with the conveyance under this subsection as 
        the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 
        interests of the United States.
            (6) Fish and wildlife mitigation agreement.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may pay the 
                State of South Carolina not more than 
                $4,850,000, subject to the Secretary and the 
                State entering into a binding agreement for the 
                State to manage for fish and wildlife 
                mitigation purposes in perpetuity the parcels 
                ofland conveyed under this subsection and 
excluded parcels designated in Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-
85-1904.
                    (B) Failure of performance.--The agreement 
                shall specify the terms and conditions under 
                which payment will be made and the rights of, 
                and remedies available to, the Federal 
                Government to recover all or a portion of the 
                payment if the State fails to manage any parcel 
                in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (j) Clarkston, Washington.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the 
        Port of Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States in and to a portion of 
        the land described in the Department of the Army lease 
        No. DACW68-1-97-22, consisting of approximately 31 
        acres, the exact boundaries of which shall be 
        determined by the Secretary and the Port of Clarkston.
            (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to 
        the Port of Clarkston, Washington, such additional land 
        located in the vicinity of Clarkston, Washington, as 
        the Secretary determines to be excess to the needs of 
        the Columbia River Project and appropriate for 
        conveyance.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made 
        under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to such 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        necessary to protect the interests of the United 
        States, including a requirement that the Port of 
        Clarkston pay all administrative costs associated with 
        the conveyances, including the cost of land surveys and 
        appraisals and costs associated with compliance with 
        applicable environmental laws (including regulations).
            (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be 
        required to pay the fair market value, as determined by 
        the Secretary, of any land conveyed under paragraphs 
        (1) and (2) that is not retained in public ownership 
        and used for public park or recreation purposes, except 
        that the Secretary shall have a right of reverter to 
        reclaim possession and title to any such land.
    (k) Matewan, West Virginia.--
            (1) In general.--The United States shall convey by 
        quitclaim deed to the town of Matewan, West Virginia, 
        all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to 4 parcels of land that the Secretary determines 
        to be excess to the structural project for flood 
        control constructed by the Corps of Engineers along the 
        Tug Fork River under section 202 of the Energy and 
        Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
        1339).
            (2) Property description.--The parcels of land 
        referred to in paragraph (1) are as follows:
                    (A) A certain parcel of land in the State 
                of West Virginia, Mingo County, town of 
                Matewan, being more particularly bounded and 
                described as follows:
                            Beginning at a point on the 
                        southerly right-of-way line of a 40-
                        foot-wide street right-of-way (known as 
                        McCoy Alley), having an approximate 
                        coordinate value of N228,695, 
                        E1,662,397, in the line common to the 
                        land designated as U.S.A. Tract No. 
                        834, and the land designated as U.S.A. 
                        Tract No. 837, said point being South 
                        51+52, East 81.8 feet from an iron pin 
                        and cap marked M-12 on the boundary of 
                        the Matewan Area Structural Project, on 
                        the north right-of-way line of said 
                        street, at a corner common to 
                        designated U.S.A. Tracts Nos. 834 and 
                        836; thence, leaving the right-of-way 
                        of said street, with the line common to 
                        the land of said Tract No. 834, and the 
                        land of said Tract No. 837.
                            South 14+37, West 46 feet to the 
                        corner common to the land of said Tract 
                        No. 834, and the land of said Tract No. 
                        837; thence, leaving the land of said 
                        Tract No. 837, severing the lands of 
                        said Project.
                            South 14+37, West 46 feet.
                            South 68+07, East 239 feet.
                            North 26+05, East 95 feet to a 
                        point on the southerly right-of-way 
                        line of said street; thence, with the 
                        right-of-way of said street, continuing 
                        to sever the lands of said Project.
                            South 63+55, East 206 feet; thence, 
                        leaving the right-of-way of said 
                        street, continuing to sever the lands 
                        of said Project.
                            South 26+16, West 63 feet; thence, 
                        with a curve to the left having a 
                        radius of 70 feet, a delta of 33+58,, 
                        an arc length of 41 feet, the chord 
                        bearing.
                            South 09+17, West 41 feet; thence, 
                        leaving said curve, continuing to sever 
                        the lands of said Project.
                            South 07+42, East 31 feet to a 
                        point on the right-of-way line of the 
                        floodwall; thence, with the right-of-
                        way of said floodwall, continuing to 
                        sever the lands of said Project.
                            South 77+04, West 71 feet.
                            North 77+10, West 46 feet.
                            North 67+07, West 254 feet.
                            North 67+54, West 507 feet.
                            North 57+49, West 66 feet to the 
                        intersection of the right-of-way line 
                        of said floodwall with the southerly 
                        right-of-way line of said street; 
                        thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                        said floodwall and with the southerly 
                        right-of-way of said street, continuing 
                        to sever the lands of said Project.
                            North 83+01, East 171 feet.
                            North 89+42, East 74 feet.
                            South 83+39, East 168 feet.
                            South 83+38, East 41 feet.
                            South 77+26, East 28 feet to the 
                        point of beginning, containing 2.59 
                        acres, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this 
                subparagraph are referenced to the West 
                Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, South 
                Zone.
                    (B) A certain parcel of land in the State 
                of West Virginia, Mingo County, town of 
                Matewan, being more particularly bounded and 
                described as follows:
                            Beginning at an iron pin and cap 
                        designated Corner No. M2-2 on the 
                        southerly right-of-way line of the 
                        Norfolk and Western Railroad, having an 
                        approximate coordinate value of 
                        N228,755 E1,661,242, and being at the 
                        intersection of the right-of-way line 
                        of the floodwall with the boundary of 
                        the Matewan Area Structural Project; 
                        thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                        said floodwall and with said Project 
                        boundary, and the southerly right-of-
                        way of said Railroad.
                            North 59+45, East 34 feet.
                            North 69+50, East 44 feet.
                            North 58+11, East 79 feet.
                            North 66+13, East 102 feet.
                            North 69+43, East 98 feet.
                            North 77+39, East 18 feet.
                            North 72+39, East 13 feet to a 
                        point at the intersection of said 
                        Project boundary, and the southerly 
                        right-of-way of said Railroad, with the 
                        westerly right-of-way line of State 
                        Route 49/10; thence, leaving said 
                        Project boundary, and the southerly 
                        right-of-way of said Railroad, and with 
                        the westerly right-of-way of said road.
                            South 03+21, East 100 feet to a 
                        point at the intersection of the 
                        westerly right-of-way of said road with 
                        the right-of-way of said floodwall; 
                        thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                        said road, and with the right-of-way 
                        line of said floodwall.
                            South 79+30, West 69 feet.
                            South 78+28, West 222 feet.
                            South 80+11, West 65 feet.
                            North 38+40, West 14 feet to the 
                        point of beginning, containing 0.53 
                        acre, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this 
                subparagraph are referenced to the West 
                Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, South 
                Zone.
                    (C) A certain parcel of land in the State 
                of West Virginia, Mingo County, town of 
                Matewan, being more particularly bounded and 
                described as follows:
                            Beginning at a point on the 
                        southerly right-of-way line of the 
                        Norfolk and Western Railroad, having an 
                        approximate coordinate value of 
                        N228,936 E1,661,672, and being at the 
                        intersection of the easterly right-of-
                        way line of State Route 49/10 with the 
                        boundary of the Matewan Area Structural 
                        Project; thence, leaving the right-of-
                        way of said road, and with said Project 
                        boundary, and the southerly right-of-
                        way of said Railroad.
                            North 77+49, East 89 feet to an 
                        iron pin and cap designated as U.S.A. 
                        Corner No. M-4.
                            North 79+30, East 74 feet to an 
                        iron pin and cap designated as U.S.A. 
                        Corner No. M-5-1; thence, leaving the 
                        southerly right-of-way of said 
                        Railroad, and continuing with the 
                        boundary of said Project.
                            South 06+33, East 102 to an iron 
                        pipe and cap designated U.S.A. Corner 
                        No. M-6-1 on the northerly right-of-way 
                        line of State Route 49/28; thence, 
                        leaving the boundary of said Project, 
                        and with the right-of-way of said road, 
                        severing the lands of said Project.
                            North 80+59, West 171 feet to a 
                        point at the intersection of the 
                        Northerly right-of-way line of said 
                        State Route 49/28 with the easterly 
                        right-of-way line of said State Route 
                        49/10; thence, leaving the right-of-way 
                        of said State Route 49/28 and with the 
                        right-of-way of said State Route 49/10.
                            North 03+21, West 42 feet to the 
                        point of beginning, containing 0.27 
                        acre, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this 
                subparagraph are referenced to the West 
                Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, South 
                Zone.
                    (D) A certain parcel of land in the State 
                of West Virginia, Mingo County, town of 
                Matewan, being more particularly bounded and 
                described as follows:
                            Beginning at a point at the 
                        intersection of the easterly right-of-
                        way line of State Route 49/10 with the 
                        right-of-way line of the floodwall, 
                        having an approximate coordinate value 
                        of N228,826 E1,661,679; thence, leaving 
                        the right-of-way of said floodwall, and 
                        with the right-of-way of said State 
                        Route 49/10.
                            North 03+21, West 23 feet to a 
                        point at the intersection of the 
                        easterly right-of-way line of said 
                        State Route 49/10 with the southerly 
                        right-of-way line of State Route 49/28; 
                        thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                        said State Route 49/10 and with the 
                        right-of-way of said State Route 49/28.
                            South 80+59, East 168 feet.
                            North 82+28, East 45 feet to an 
                        iron pin and cap designated as U.S.A. 
                        Corner No. M-8-1 on the boundary of the 
                        Western Area Structural Project; 
                        thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                        said State Route 49/28, and with said 
                        Project boundary.
                            South 08+28, East 88 feet to an 
                        iron pin and cap designated as U.S.A. 
                        Corner No. M-9-1 point on the northerly 
                        right-of-way line of a street (known as 
                        McCoy Alley); thence, leaving said 
                        Project boundary and with the northerly 
                        right-of-way of said street.
                            South 83+01, West 38 feet to a 
                        point on the right-of-way line of said 
                        floodwall; thence, leaving the right-
                        of-way of said street, and with the 
                        right-of-way of said floodwall.
                            North 57+49, West 180 feet.
                            South 79+30, West 34 feet to a 
                        point of beginning, containing 0.24 
                        acre, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this 
                subparagraph are referenced to the West 
                Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, South 
                Zone.
    (l) McNary National Wildlife Refuge.--
            (1) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.--
        Administrative jurisdiction over the McNary National 
        Wildlife Refuge is transferred from the Secretary to 
        the Secretary of the Interior.
            (2) Land exchange with the port of walla walla, 
        washington.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 1 year 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary of the Interior may exchange 
                approximately 188 acres of land located south 
                of Highway 12 and comprising a portion of the 
                McNary National Wildlife Refuge for 
                approximately 122 acres of land owned by the 
                Port of Walla Walla, Washington, and located at 
                the confluence of the Snake River and the 
                Columbia River.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--The land 
                exchange under subparagraph (A) shall be 
                carried out in accordance with such terms and 
                conditions as the Secretary of the Interior 
                determines to be necessary to protect the 
                interests of the United States, including a 
                requirement that the Port pay--
                            (i) reasonable administrative costs 
                        (not to exceed $50,000) associated with 
                        the exchange; and
                            (ii) any excess (as determined by 
                        the Secretary of the Interior) of the 
                        fair market value of the parcel 
                        conveyed by the Secretary of the 
                        Interior over the fair market value of 
                        the parcel conveyed by the Port.
                    (C) Use of funds.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior may retain any funds received under 
                subparagraph (B)(ii) and, without further Act 
                of appropriation, may use the funds to acquire 
                replacement habitat for the Mid-Columbia River 
                National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
            (3) Management.--The McNary National Wildlife 
        Refuge and land conveyed by the Port of Walla Walla, 
        Washington, under paragraph (2) shall be managed in 
        accordance with applicable laws, including section 
        120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
        Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 
        9620(h)) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 
        1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

SEC. 564. MCNARY POOL, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
Restrictions.--With respect to each deed listed in subsection 
(b)--
            (1) the reversionary interests and the use 
        restrictions relating to port or industrial purposes 
        are extinguished;
            (2) the human habitation or other building 
        structure use restriction is extinguished in each area 
        where the elevation is above the standard project flood 
        elevation; and
            (3) the use of fill material to raise low areas 
        above the standard project flood elevation is 
        authorized, except in any low area constituting wetland 
        for which a permit under section 404 of the Federal 
        Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) would be 
        required.
    (b) Affected Deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
auditor's file numbers are referred to in subsection (a):
            (1) Auditor's File Numbers 521608 and 529071 of 
        Benton County, Washington.
            (2) Auditor's File Numbers 262980, 263334, 318437, 
        and 404398 of Franklin County, Washington.
            (3) Auditor's File Numbers 411133, 447417, 447418, 
        462156, 563333, and 569593 of Walla Walla County, 
        Washington.
            (4) Auditor's File Number 285215 of Umatilla 
        County, Oregon, executed by the United States.
    (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section 
affects the remaining rights and interests of the Corps of 
Engineers for authorized project purposes.

SEC. 565. NAMINGS.

    (a) Francis Bland Floodway Ditch, Arkansas.--
            (1) Designation.--8-Mile Creek in Paragould, 
        Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the 
        ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.
            (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the 
        United States to the creekreferred to in paragraph (1) 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Francis Bland Floodway 
Ditch''.
    (b) Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge, Arkansas.--
            (1) Designation.--The bridge over lock and dam 
        numbered 4 on the Arkansas River, Arkansas, constructed 
        as part of the project for navigation on the Arkansas 
        River and tributaries, shall be known and designated as 
        the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge''.
            (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the 
        United States to the bridge referred to in paragraph 
        (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
        Blackwell Memorial Bridge''.
    (c) John H. Chafee National Wildlife Refuge.--Title II of 
Public Law 100-610 (16 U.S.C. 668dd note; 102 Stat. 3176) is 
amended--
            (1) in the title heading, by striking 
        ``PETTAQUAMSCUTT COVE'' and inserting ``JOHN H. 
        CHAFEE'';
            (2) in section 201--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' 
                at the end;
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the 
                period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) John H. Chafee has been a steadfast champion 
        for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and natural 
        resources throughout a distinguished career of public 
        service to the people of Rhode Island and the United 
        States.'';
            (3) in section 202, by striking ``Pettaquamscutt 
        Cove'' and inserting ``John H. Chafee''; and
            (4) in section 203(1), by striking ``Pettaquamscutt 
        Cove'' and inserting ``John H. Chafee''.

SEC. 566. FOLSOM DAM AND RESERVOIR ADDITIONAL STORAGE AND ADDITIONAL 
                    FLOOD CONTROL STUDIES.

    (a) Folsom Flood Control Studies.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the State of California and local water resources 
        agencies, shall undertake a study of increasing 
        surcharge flood control storage at the Folsom Dam and 
        Reservoir.
            (2) Limitations.--The study of the Folsom Dam and 
        Reservoir undertaken under paragraph (1) shall assume 
        that there is to be no increase in conservation storage 
        at the Folsom Reservoir.
            (3) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2000, the 
        Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
        results of the study under this subsection.
    (b) American and Sacramento Rivers Flood Control Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall undertake a 
        study of all levees on the American River and on the 
        Sacramento River downstream and immediately upstream of 
        the confluence of such Rivers to access opportunities 
        to increase potential flood protection through levee 
        modifications.
            (2) Deadline for completion.--Not later than March 
        1, 2000, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
        report on the results of the study undertaken under 
        this subsection.

SEC. 567. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Emergency Action.--The Secretary shall take emergency 
action to protect Wallops Island, Virginia, from damaging 
coastal storms, by improving and extending the existing 
seawall, replenishing and renourishing the beach, and 
constructing protective dunes.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary may seek reimbursement 
from other Federal agencies whose resources are protected by 
the emergency action taken under subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $8,000,000.

SEC. 568. DETROIT RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Greenway Corridor Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of a project for shoreline 
protection, frontal erosion, and associated purposes in the 
Detroit River shoreline area from the Belle Isle Bridge to the 
Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, Michigan.
    (b) Potential Modifications.--As part of the study, the 
Secretary shall review potential project modifications to any 
Corps of Engineers project within the Detroit River shoreline 
area.
    (c) Repair and Rehabilitation.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and 
        rehabilitate the seawalls on the Detroit River in 
        Detroit, Michigan, if the Secretary determines that 
        such work is technically sound, environmentally 
        acceptable, and economically justified.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out paragraph 
        (1) $1,000,000 for the period beginning with fiscal 
        year 2000.

SEC. 569. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) Definition of Northeastern Minnesota.--In this section, 
the term ``northeastern Minnesota'' means the counties of Cook, 
Lake, St. Louis, Koochiching, Itasca, Cass, Crow Wing, Aitkin, 
Carlton, Pine, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Benton, 
Sherburne, Isanti, and Chisago, Minnesota.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in northeastern Minnesota.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in northeastern Minnesota, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water 
supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for 
        the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of 
                project costs under each local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
                for a project. The credit for the design work 
                shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way 
                credit.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the pilot program carried out under this section, including 
recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 570. ALASKA.

    (a) Definition of Native Corporation.--In this section, the 
term ``Native Corporation'' has the meaning given the term in 
section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1602).
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in Alaska.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in Alaska, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and 
related facilities, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirements.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned or is owned by a Native Corporation.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for 
        the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                project costs under each local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
                for a project. The credit for the design work 
                shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of a project that is the subject of an 
                agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal 
                share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way 
                credit.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the pilot program carried out under this section, including a 
recommendation concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 571. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Definition of Central West Virginia.--In this section, 
the term ``central West Virginia'' means the counties of Mason, 
Jackson, Putnam, Kanawha, Roane, Wirt, Calhoun, Clay, Nicholas, 
Braxton, Gilmer, Lewis, Upshur, Randolph, Pendleton, Hardy, 
Hampshire, Morgan, Berkeley, and Jefferson, West Virginia.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in central West Virginia.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in central West Virginia, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water 
supply and related facilities, and surface water resource 
protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for 
        the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the 
                project costs under each local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
                for a project. The credit for the design work 
                shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of a project that is the subject of an 
                agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal 
                share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way 
                credit.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the pilot program carried out under this section, including a 
recommendation concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 572. SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AREA WATERSHED RESTORATION, 
                    CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Limitation.--The Secretary may undertake studies to 
determine the extent of ground water contamination and the 
feasibility of prevention and cleanup of such contamination 
resulting from the acts of a Federal department or agency--
            (1) at or in the vicinity of McClellan Air Force 
        Base, Mather Air Force Base, or Sacramento Army Depot, 
        California; or
            (2) at any place in the Sacramento metropolitan 
        area watershed where the Federal Government would be a 
        responsible party under any Federal environmental law.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the 
period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 573. ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) plan, design, and construct projects that are 
        consistent with the Onondaga Lake Management Plan and 
        comply with the amended consent judgment and the 
        project labor agreement for the environmental 
        restoration, conservation, and management of Onondaga 
        Lake, New York; and
            (2) provide, in coordination with the Administrator 
        of the Environmental Protection Agency, financial 
        assistance, including grants to the State of New York 
        and political subdivisions of the State, for the 
        development and implementation of projects to restore, 
        conserve, and manage the lake.
    (b) Partnership.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall establish and lead a partnership with 
        appropriate Federal agencies (including the 
        Environmental Protection Agency) and the State of New 
        York and political subdivisions of the State for the 
        purpose of development and implementation of the 
        projects.
            (2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
                    (A) In general.--The partnership shall 
                coordinate the actions taken under this section 
                with actions to restore and conserve Onondaga 
                Lake taken under other provisions of Federal or 
                State law.
                    (B) No effect on other law.--Except as 
                provided in subsection (g), this section does 
                not alter, modify, or affect any other 
                provision of Federal or State law.
            (3) Termination.--Unless the Secretary and the 
        Governor of the State of New York agree otherwise, the 
        partnership established under this subsection shall 
        terminate not later than the date that is 15 years 
        after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Revisions to the Onondaga Lake Management Plan.--
            (1) In general.--In consultation with the 
        partnership established under subsection (b) and after 
        providing for public review and comment, the Secretary 
        and the Administrator of the Environmental 
ProtectionAgency shall approve revisions to the Onondaga Lake 
Management Plan if the Governor of the State of New York concurs in the 
approval.
            (2) No effect on modification of amended consent 
        judgment.--Paragraph (1) has no effect on the 
        conditions under which the amended consent judgment 
        referred to in subsection (a)(1) may be modified.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of a project constructed under subsection (a) 
        shall be not less than 30 percent of the total cost of 
        the project and may be provided through the provision 
        of in-kind services.
            (2) Administration and management.--The Secretary's 
        administration and management of the project shall be 
        at full Federal expense.
    (e) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of financial 
assistance under this section shall not relieve from liability 
any person that would otherwise be liable under Federal or 
State law for damages, response costs, natural resource 
damages, restitution, equitable relief, or any other relief.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
    (g) Repeal.--Title IV of the Great Lakes Critical Programs 
Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 3010) and section 411 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4648) are repealed 
effective on the date that is 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 574. EAST LYNN LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall defer any decision relating to the 
leasing of mineral resources underlying East Lynn Lake, West 
Virginia, project lands to the Federal entity vested with such 
leasing authority.

SEC. 575. EEL RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine whether flooding in the city of Ferndale, California, 
is the result of the Federal flood control project on the Eel 
River.
    (b) Mitigation Measures.--If the Secretary determines that 
the flooding is the result of the project, the Secretary shall 
take appropriate measures (including dredging of the Salt River 
and construction of sediment ponds at the confluence of 
Francis, Reas, and Williams Creeks) to mitigate the flooding.

SEC. 576. NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary--
            (1) shall review a report prepared by the non-
        Federal interest concerning flood protection for the 
        Dark Hollow area of North Little Rock, Arkansas; and
            (2) if the Secretary determines that the report 
        meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps 
        of Engineers and that the project is economically 
        justified, technically sound, and environmentally 
        acceptable, may carry out the project.

SEC. 577. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSISSIPPI PLACE, ST. PAUL, 
                    MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may enter into a cooperative 
agreement to participate in a project for the planning, design, 
and construction of infrastructure and other improvements at 
Mississippi Place, St. Paul, Minnesota.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        the project shall be 50 percent. The Federal share may 
        be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
        project costs.
            (2) Credit for non-federal work.--The non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project for reasonable costs 
        incurred by the non-Federal interest as a result of 
        participation in the planning, design, and construction 
        of the project.
            (3) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project for land, 
        easements, rights-of-way, and relocations provided by 
        the non-Federal interest with respect to the project.
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
        share of operation and maintenance costs for the 
        project shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 578. DREDGING OF SALT PONDS IN THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary may acquire for the State of Rhode Island a 
dredge and associated equipment with the capacity to dredge 
approximately 100 cubic yards per hour for use by the State in 
dredging salt ponds in the State.

SEC. 579. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    Section 567(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3787) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) The Chemung River watershed, New York, at an 
        estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000.''.

SEC. 580. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, FLOOD PROJECT MITIGATION.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and other 
purposes, Cumberland, Maryland, authorized by section 5 of the 
Act of June 22, 1936 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act 
of 1936'') (49 Stat. 1574, chapter 688), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to undertake, as a separate part of the 
project, restoration of the historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal 
substantially in accordance with the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal 
National Historic Park, Cumberland, Maryland, Rewatering Design 
Analysis, dated February 1998, at a total cost of $15,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $9,750,000 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.
    (b) In-Kind Services.--The non-Federal interest for the 
restoration project under subsection (a)--
            (1) may provide all or a portion of the non-Federal 
        share of project costs in the form of in-kind services; 
        and
            (2) shall receive credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of project costs for design and construction work 
        performed by the non-Federal interest before execution 
        of a project cooperation agreement and for land, 
        easements, and rights-of-way required for the 
        restoration and acquired by the non-Federal interest 
        before execution of such an agreement.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation and 
maintenance of the restoration project under subsection (a) 
shall be the full responsibility of the National Park Service.

SEC. 581. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.

    Section 5(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426h), is amended by inserting before the semicolon the 
following: ``, including the city of Miami Beach, Florida''.

SEC. 582. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
                    RIVERS SALMON SURVIVAL.

    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(16 U.S.C. 3301 note; Public Law 104-303) is amended by 
striking subsection (a) and all that follows and inserting the 
following:
    ``(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
            ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the 
        Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of the Interior, 
        the Secretary shall accelerate ongoing research and 
        development activities, and may carry out or 
        participate in additional research and development 
        activities, for the purpose of developing innovative 
        methods and technologies for improving the survival of 
        salmon, especially salmon in the Columbia/Snake River 
        Basin.
            ``(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research 
        and development activities referred to in paragraph (1) 
        may include research and development related to--
                    ``(A) impacts from water resources projects 
                and other impacts on salmon life cycles;
                    ``(B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
                    ``(C) light and sound guidance systems;
                    ``(D) surface-oriented collector systems;
                    ``(E) transportation mechanisms; and
                    ``(F) dissolved gas monitoring and 
                abatement.
            ``(3) Additional activities.--Additional research 
        and development activities referred to in paragraph (1) 
        may include research and development related to--
                    ``(A) studies of juvenile salmon survival 
                in spawning and rearing areas;
                    ``(B) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and 
                adult salmon survival;
                    ``(C) impacts on salmon life cycles from 
                sources other than water resources projects;
                    ``(D) cryopreservation of fish gametes and 
                formation of a germ plasma repository for 
                threatened and endangered populations of native 
                fish; and
                    ``(E) other innovative technologies and 
                actions intended to improve fish survival, 
                including the survival of resident fish.
            ``(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate 
        any activities carried out under this subsection with 
        appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, 
        affected Indian tribes, and the Northwest Power 
        Planning Council.
            ``(5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the 
        date of enactment of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1999, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
        report on the research and development activities 
        carried out under this subsection, including any 
        recommendations of the Secretary concerning the 
        research and development activities.
            ``(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out 
        research and development activities under paragraph 
        (3).
    ``(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
            ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the 
        Secretary of Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate 
        efforts toward developing and installing in Corps of 
        Engineers-operated dams innovative, efficient, and 
        environmentally safe hydropower turbines, including 
        design of fish-friendly turbines, for use on the 
        Columbia/Snake River hydrosystem.
            ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated $35,000,000 to carry out 
        this subsection.
    ``(c) Management of Predation on Columbia/Snake River 
System Native Fishes.--
            ``(1) Nesting avian predators.--In conjunction with 
        the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the 
        Interior, and consistent with a management plan to be 
        developed by the United States Fish and Wildlife 
        Service, the Secretary shall carry out methods to 
        reduce nesting populations of avian predators on dredge 
        spoil islands in the Columbia River under the 
        jurisdiction of the Secretary.
            ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out 
        research and development activities under this 
        subsection.
    ``(d) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the 
authority of the Secretary to implement the results of the 
research and development carried out under this section or any 
other law.''.

SEC. 583. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall work with the Secretary of 
Transportation on a proposed solution to carry out the project 
to maintain the Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California, 
authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).

SEC. 584. HOLES CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the non-Federal share of project costs for the project for 
flood control, Holes Creek, Ohio, shall not exceed the sum of--
            (1) the total amount projected as the non-Federal 
        share as of September 30, 1996, in the Project 
        Cooperation Agreement executed on that date; and
            (2) 100 percent of the amount of any increases in 
        the cost of the locally preferred plan over the cost 
        estimated in the Project Cooperation Agreement.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
Federal interest any amount paid by the non-Federal interest in 
excess of the non-Federal share.

SEC. 585. SAN JACINTO DISPOSAL AREA, GALVESTON, TEXAS.

    Section 108 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1994 (107 Stat. 1320), is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by 
        inserting ``all or any part of'' after ``absolute title 
        to'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(b) Compensation for Conveyance.--
            ``(1) In general.--Upon receipt of compensation 
        from the City of Galveston, the Secretary shall convey 
        the parcel, or any part of the parcel, as described in 
        subsection (a).
            ``(2) Full parcel.--If the full 605-acre parcel is 
        conveyed, the compensation shall be--
                    ``(A) conveyance to the Department of the 
                Army of fee simple absolute title to a parcel 
                of land containing approximately 564 acres on 
                Pelican Island, Texas, in the Eneas Smith 
                Survey, A-190, Pelican Island, city of 
                Galveston, Galveston County, Texas, adjacent to 
                property currently owned by the United States, 
                with the fair market value of the parcel being 
                determined in accordance with subsection (d); 
                and
                    ``(B) payment to the United States of an 
                amount equal to the difference between the fair 
                market value of the parcel to be conveyed under 
                subsection (a) and the fair market value of the 
                parcel to be conveyed under subparagraph (A).
            ``(3) Partial parcel.--If the conveyance is 125 
        acres or less, compensation shall be an amount equal to 
        the fair market value of the parcel to be conveyed, 
        with the fair market value of the parcel being 
        determined in accordance with subsection (d).''; and
            (3) in the second sentence of subsection (c)--
                    (A) by inserting ``, or any part of the 
                parcel,'' after ``parcel''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, if any,'' after 
                ``LCA''.

SEC. 586. WATER MONITORING STATION.

    Section 584(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and 
inserting ``$100,000''.

SEC. 587. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY, RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 585 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3791) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``river'' and 
        inserting ``sewer''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$30,000,000'' 
        and inserting ``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 588. LOWER CHENA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary may expend up to $500,000 in fiscal year 2000 
to complete the dredging project initiated on the Lower Chena 
River, Alaska.

SEC. 589. NUMANA DAM FISH PASSAGE, NEVADA.

    After the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall complete planning, design, and construction of the Numana 
Dam Fish Passage Project, currently being evaluated under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a), under section 906(b) of that Act (33 U.S.C. 
2283(b)).

SEC. 590. EMBREY DAM, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall remove the Embrey Dam 
on the Rappahannock River at Fredericksburg, Virginia, at full 
Federal expense.
    (b) Use of Existing Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite 
the feasibility study and preconstruction, engineering, and 
design of the project by using, to the maximum extent 
practicable, existing studies prepared by the State and non-
Federal interests.
    (c) Authorization.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 591. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Participation of Secretary.--
            (1) Authorization.--The Secretary shall participate 
        with other Federal departments and agencies in 
        environmental restoration and remediation activities 
        (including the demolition of contaminated buildings)at 
the Avtex Fibers facility in Front Royal, Virginia, at full Federal 
expense.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
        $12,000,000.
    (b) Participation of Secretary of Defense.--
            (1) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
        make available $5,000,000 for environmental restoration 
        and remediation activities (including the demolition of 
        contaminated buildings) at the Avtex Fibers facility in 
        Front Royal, Virginia.
            (2) Source of funds.--The amount made available 
        under paragraph (1) shall be derived from amounts in 
        the Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used 
        Defense Sites, established by section 2703 of title 10, 
        United States Code.

SEC. 592. MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in Mississippi.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in Mississippi, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, elimination or 
control of combined sewer overflows, water supply and related 
facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water 
resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for 
        the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of 
                project costs under each local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
                for a project. The credit for the design work 
                shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way 
                credit.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                theproject on publicly owned or controlled 
land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the pilot program carried out under this section, including 
recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 593. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Definition of Central New Mexico.--In this section, the 
term ``central New Mexico'' means the counties of Bernalillo, 
Sandoval, and Valencia, New Mexico.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in central New Mexico.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in central New Mexico, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water 
supply, conservation, and related facilities, stormwater 
retention and remediation, environmental restoration, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for 
        the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of 
                project costs under each local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
                for a project. The credit for the design work 
                shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shallreceive credit for 
reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share of the 
project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way 
                credit.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
                project costs (including all reasonable costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
                the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the pilot program carried out under this section, including 
recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for 
the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 594. OHIO.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
establish a program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in Ohio.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in Ohio, including projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
        treatment, and related facilities;
            (3) mine drainage;
            (4) environmental restoration; and
            (5) surface water resource protection and 
        development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is publicly owned.
    (d) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a project 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each project cooperation 
        agreement entered into under this subsection shall 
        provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities development plan or 
                resource protection plan, including appropriate 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of 
                project costs under each project cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                project cooperation agreement with the 
                Secretary.
                    (C) Credit for certain financing costs.--In 
                case of a delay in the reimbursement of the 
                non-Federal share of the costs of a project, 
                the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest and other associated 
                financing costs necessary for the non-Federal 
                interest to provide the non-Federal share of 
                the project costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations.--The non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for land, easements, rights-of-
                way, and relocations provided by the non-
                Federal interest toward the non-Federal share 
                of project costs (including costs associated 
                with obtaining permits necessary for the 
                placement of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed under an 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the program carried out under this section, including 
recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000.

SEC. 595. RURAL NEVADA AND MONTANA.

    (a) Definition of Rural Nevada.--In this section, the term 
``rural Nevada'' means--
            (1) the counties of Lincoln, White Pine, Nye, 
        Eureka, Elko, Humboldt, Pershing, Churchill, Storey, 
        Lyon, Carson, Douglas, Mineral, Esmeralda, and Lander, 
        Nevada;
            (2) the portions of Washoe County, Nevada, that are 
        located outside the cities of Reno and Sparks; and
            (3) the portions of Clark County, Nevada, that are 
        located outside the cities of Las Vegas, North Las 
        Vegas, and Henderson and the unincorporated portion of 
        the county in the Las Vegas Valley.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
a program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in rural Nevada and Montana.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in rural Nevada and Montana, including 
projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) water supply and related facilities;
            (3) environmental restoration; and
            (4) surface water resource protection and 
        development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the 
project is publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to 
        provide for design and construction of the project to 
        be carried out with the assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for 
        the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource 
                protection and development plan, including 
                appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of 
                project costs under each local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this subsection 
                shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by 
                the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
                for a project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a 
                delay in the funding of the non-Federal share 
                of the costs of a project that is the subject 
                of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the 
                non-Federal share of the project costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations.--The non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for land, easements, rights-of 
                way, and relocations provided by the non-
                Federal interest toward the non-Federal share 
                of project costs (including all reasonable 
                costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent 
                of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-
                Federal share of operation and maintenance 
                costs for projects constructed with assistance 
                provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the program carried out under this section, including 
recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2001--
            (1) $25,000,00 for rural Nevada; and
            (2) $25,000,000 for Montana;
to remain available until expended.

SEC. 596. PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

    Section 1608 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-6) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) The Secretary, in cooperation with the city of 
Phoenix, Arizona, shall participate in the planning, design, 
and construction of the Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation 
and Reuse Project to utilize fully wastewater from the regional 
wastewater treatment plant for direct municipal, industrial, 
agricultural and environmental purposes, groundwater recharge 
and indirect potable reuse in the Phoenix metropolitan area.'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking the first 
        sentence; and
            (3) by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 597. NATIONAL HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The first section of Public Law 99-215 (99 
Stat. 1724) is amended in the first sentence of subsection 
(a)(2) by striking ``solely'' and inserting ``for 
transportation or''.
    (b) Revision of Quitclaim Deed.--Not later than 30 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall--
            (1) with the consent of the grantee, withdraw and 
        revise any terms or conditions in the quitclaim deed of 
        December 16, 1986, between the United States and the 
        Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 
        that limit the authority of the Maryland-National 
        Capital Park and Planning Commission to use the 
        property for transportation purposes; and
            (2) prepare, execute, and record a deed that is 
        consistent with this section and the amendment made by 
        subsection (a).
    (c) Effect on Environmental Law.--Nothing in this section 
abrogates any requirement of any environmental law.

  TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
     STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

SEC. 601. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the 
        South Dakota Cultural Resources Advisory Commission 
        established by section 605(j).
            (2) Restoration.--The term ``restoration'' means 
        mitigation of the habitat of wildlife.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the 
        Secretary of the Army.
            (4) Terrestrial wildlife habitat.--The term 
        ``terrestrial wildlife habitat'' means a habitat for a 
        wildlife species (including game and nongame species) 
        that existed or exists on an upland habitat (including 
        a prairie grassland, woodland, bottom land forest, 
        scrub, or shrub) or an emergent wetland habitat.
            (5) Wildlife.--The term ``wildlife'' has the 
        meaning given the term in section 8 of the Fish and 
        Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 666b).

SEC. 602. TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION.

    (a) Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Plans.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with this subsection 
        and in consultation with the Secretary and the 
        Secretary of the Interior, the State of South Dakota, 
        the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe shall, as a condition of the receipt of 
        funds under this title, each develop a plan for the 
        restoration of terrestrial wildlife habitat loss that 
        occurred as a result of flooding related to the Big 
        Bend and Oahe projects carried out as part of the Pick-
        Sloan Missouri River Basin program.
            (2) Submission of plan to secretary.--On completion 
        of a plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, 
        the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux 
        Tribe, and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall submit the 
        plan to the Secretary.
            (3) Review by secretary and submission to 
        committees.--The Secretary shall review the plan and 
        submit the plan, with any comments, to the appropriate 
        committees of the Senate and the House of 
        Representatives.
            (4) Funding for carrying out plans.--
                    (A) State of south dakota.--
                            (i) Notification.--On receipt of 
                        the plan for terrestrial wildlife 
                        habitat restoration submitted by the 
                        State of South Dakota, each of the 
                        Committees referred to in paragraph (3) 
                        shall notify the Secretary of the 
                        receipt of the plan.
                            (ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause 
                        (i), the Secretary shall make available 
                        to the State of South Dakota funds from 
                        the South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife 
                        Habitat Restoration Trust Fund 
                        established under section 603, to be 
                        used to carry out the plan for 
                        terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration submitted by the State and 
                        only after the Trust Fund is fully 
                        capitalized.
                    (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower 
                brule sioux tribe.--
                            (i) Notification.--On receipt of 
                        the plan for terrestrial wildlife 
                        habitat restoration submitted by the 
                        Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the 
                        Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, each of the 
                        Committees referred to in paragraph (3) 
                        shall notify the Secretary of the 
                        Treasury of the receipt of each of the 
                        plans.
                            (ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause 
                        (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                        shall make available to the Cheyenne 
                        River Sioux Tribe and the LowerBrule 
Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Terrestrial 
Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund, respectively, 
established under section 604, to be used to carry out the plan for 
terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the Cheyenne 
River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, respectively, and 
only after the Trust Fund is fully capitalized.
                    (C) Transition period.--
                            (i) In general.--During the period 
                        described in clause (ii), the Secretary 
                        shall--
                                    (I) fund the terrestrial 
                                wildlife habitat restoration 
                                programs being carried out on 
                                the date of enactment of this 
                                Act on Oahe and Big Bend 
                                project land and the plans 
                                established under this section 
                                at a level that does not exceed 
                                the highest amount of funding 
                                that was provided for the 
                                programs during a previous 
                                fiscal year; and
                                    (II) fund the activities 
                                described in sections 603(d)(3) 
                                and 604(d)(3).
                            (ii) Period.--Clause (i) shall 
                        apply during the period--
                                    (I) beginning on the date 
                                of enactment of this Act; and
                                    (II) ending on the date on 
                                which funds are made available 
                                for use from the South Dakota 
                                Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
                                Restoration Trust Fund under 
                                section 603(d)(3)(A)(i) and the 
                                Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
                                Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
                                Restoration Trust Fund and the 
                                Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
                                Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
                                Restoration Trust Fund under 
                                section 604(d)(3)(A)(i).
    (b) Programs for the Purchase of Wildlife Habitat Leases.--
            (1) In general.--The State of South Dakota may use 
        funds made available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to 
        develop a program for the purchase of wildlife habitat 
        leases that meets the requirements of this subsection.
            (2) Development of a plan.--
                    (A) In general.--If the State of South 
                Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the 
                Lower Brule Sioux Tribe elects to conduct a 
                program under this subsection, the State of 
                South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 
                or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (in consultation 
                with the United States Fish and Wildlife 
                Service and the Secretary and with an 
                opportunity for public comment) shall develop a 
                plan to lease land for the protection and 
                development of wildlife habitat, including 
                habitat for threatened and endangered species, 
                associated with the Missouri River ecosystem.
                    (B) Use for program.--The plan shall be 
                used by the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne 
                River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule Sioux 
                Tribe in carrying out the program carried out 
                under paragraph (1).
            (3) Conditions of leases.--Each lease covered under 
        a program carried out under paragraph (1) shall specify 
        that the owner of the property that is subject to the 
        lease shall provide--
                    (A) public access for sportsmen during 
                hunting season; and
                    (B) public access for other outdoor uses 
                covered under the lease, as negotiated by the 
                landowner and the State of South Dakota, the 
                Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule 
                Sioux Tribe.
            (4) Use of assistance.--
                    (A) State of south dakota.--If the State of 
                South Dakota conducts a program under this 
                subsection, the State may use funds made 
                available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to--
                            (i) acquire easements, rights-of-
                        way, or leases for management and 
                        protection of wildlife habitat, 
                        including habitat for threatened and 
                        endangered species, and public access 
                        to wildlife on private property in the 
                        State of South Dakota;
                            (ii) create public access to 
                        Federal or State land through the 
                        purchase of easements or rights-of-way 
                        that traverse such private property; or
                            (iii) lease land for the creation 
                        or restoration of a wetland on such 
                        private property.
                    (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower 
                brule sioux tribe.--If the Cheyenne River Sioux 
                Tribe or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe conducts a 
                program under this subsection, the Tribe may 
                use funds made available under section 
                604(d)(3)(A)(iii) for the purposes described in 
                subparagraph (A).
    (c) Federal Obligation for Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
Mitigation for the Big Bend and Oahe Projects in South 
Dakota.--The establishment of the trust funds under sections 
603 and 604 and the development and implementation of plans for 
terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration developed by the State 
of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the Lower 
Brule Sioux Tribe in accordance with this section shall be 
considered to satisfy the Federal obligation under the Fish and 
Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) for 
terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation for the State of South 
Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the Lower Brule 
Sioux Tribe for the Big Bend and Oahe projects carried out as 
part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program.

SEC. 603. SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION TRUST 
                    FUND.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury of 
the United States a fund to be known as the ``South Dakota 
Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' (referred 
to in this section as the ``Fund'').
    (b) Funding.--For the fiscal year during which this Act is 
enacted and each fiscal year thereafter until the aggregate 
amount deposited in the Fund under this subsection is equal to 
at least $108,000,000, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
transfer $10,000,000 from the general fund of the Treasury to 
the Fund.
    (c) Investments.--
            (1) In general.--At the request of the Secretary, 
        the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the amounts 
        deposited under subsection (b) only in interest-bearing 
        obligations of the United States or in obligations 
        guaranteed by the United States as to both principal 
        and interest.
            (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall invest amounts in the fund in obligations that 
        carry the highest rate of interest among available 
        obligations of the required maturity.
    (d) Payments.--
            (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest 
        under subsection (c) shall be available, without fiscal 
        year limitation, to the State of South Dakota for use 
        in accordance with paragraph (3) after the Fund has 
        been fully capitalized.
            (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to 
        section 602(a)(4)(A), the Secretary shall withdraw 
        amounts credited as interest under paragraph (1) and 
        transfer the amounts to the State of South Dakota for 
        use as State funds in accordance with paragraph (3) 
        after the Fund has been fully capitalized.
            (3) Use of transferred funds.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph 
                (B), the State of South Dakota shall use the 
                amounts transferred under paragraph (2) only 
                to--
                            (i) fully fund the annually 
                        scheduled work described in the 
                        terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration plan of the State developed 
                        under section 602(a); and
                            (ii) with any remaining funds--
                                    (I) protect archaeological, 
                                historical, and cultural sites 
                                located along the Missouri 
                                River on land transferred to 
                                the State;
                                    (II) fund all costs 
                                associated with the ownership, 
                                management, operation, 
                                administration, maintenance, 
                                and development of recreation 
                                areas and other lands that are 
                                transferred to the State of 
                                South Dakota by the Secretary;
                                    (III) purchase and 
                                administer wildlife habitat 
                                leases under section 602(b);
                                    (IV) carry out other 
                                activities described in section 
                                602; and
                                    (V) develop and maintain 
                                public access to, and protect, 
                                wildlife habitat and recreation 
                                areas along the Missouri River.
                    (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred 
                under paragraph (2) shall not be used for the 
                purchase of land in fee title.
    (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in 
subsection (d), the Secretary may not transfer or withdraw any 
amount deposited under subsection (b).
    (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as are 
necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.

SEC. 604. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE AND LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE 
                    TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION TRUST 
                    FUNDS.

    (a) Establishment.--There are established in the Treasury 
of the United States 2 funds to be known as the ``Cheyenne 
River Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund'' 
and the ``Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
Restoration Trust Fund'' (each of which is referred to in this 
section as a ``Fund'').
    (b) Funding.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), for the 
        fiscal year during which this Act is enacted and each 
        fiscal year thereafter until the aggregate amount 
        deposited in the Funds under this subsection is equal 
        to at least $57,400,000, the Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall transfer $5,000,000 from the general fund of the 
        Treasury to the Funds.
            (2) Allocation.--Of the total amount of funds 
        deposited in the Funds for a fiscal year, the Secretary 
        of the Treasury shall deposit--
                    (A) 74 percent of the funds into the 
                Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
                Restoration Trust Fund; and
                    (B) 26 percent of the funds into the Lower 
                Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
                Restoration Trust Fund.
    (c) Investments.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall invest the amounts deposited under subsection (b) 
        only in interest-bearing obligations of the United 
        States or in obligations guaranteed as to both 
        principal and interest by the United States.
            (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall invest amounts in the Funds in obligations that 
        carry the highest rate of interest among available 
        obligations of the required maturity.
    (d) Payments.--
            (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest 
        under subsection (c) shall be available after the Trust 
        Funds are fully capitalized, without fiscal year 
        limitation, to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the 
        Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for their use in accordance 
        with paragraph (3).
            (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to 
        section 602(a)(4)(B), the Secretary of the Treasury 
        shall withdraw amounts credited as interest under 
        paragraph (1) and transfer the amounts to the Cheyenne 
        River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for 
        use in accordance with paragraph (3).
            (3) Use of transferred funds.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph 
                (B), the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the 
                Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall use the amounts 
                transferred under paragraph (2) only to--
                            (i) fully fund the annually 
                        scheduled work described in the 
                        terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration plan of the respective 
                        Tribe developed under section 602(a); 
                        and
                            (ii) with any remaining funds--
                                    (I) protect archaeological, 
                                historical, and cultural sites 
                                located along the Missouri 
                                River on land transferred to 
                                the respective Tribe;
                                    (II) fund all costs 
                                associated with the ownership, 
                                management, operation, 
                                administration, maintenance, 
                                and development of recreation 
                                areas and other lands that are 
                                transferred to the respective 
                                Tribe by the Secretary;
                                    (III) purchase and 
                                administer wildlife habitat 
                                leases under section 602(b);
                                    (IV) carry out other 
                                activities described in section 
                                602; and
                                    (V) develop and maintain 
                                public access to, and protect, 
                                wildlife habitat and recreation 
                                areas along the Missouri River.
                    (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred 
                under paragraph (2) shall not be used for the 
                purchase of land in fee title.
    (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in 
subsection (d), the Secretary of the Treasury may not transfer 
or withdraw any amount deposited under subsection (b).
    (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as are 
necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.

SEC. 605. TRANSFER OF FEDERAL LAND TO STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Transfer.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                transfer to the Department of Game, Fish and 
                Parks of the State of South Dakota (referred to 
                in this section as the ``Department'') the land 
                and recreation areas described in subsections 
                (b) and (c) for fish and wildlife purposes, or 
                public recreation uses, in perpetuity.
                    (B) Permits, rights-of-way, and 
                easements.--All permits, rights-of-way, and 
                easements granted by the Secretary to the 
                Oglala Sioux Tribe for land on the west side of 
                the Missouri River between the Oahe Dam and 
                Highway 14, and all permits, rights-of-way, and 
                easements on any other land administered by the 
                Secretary and used by the Oglala Sioux Rural 
                Water Supply System, are granted to the Oglala 
                Sioux Tribe in perpetuity to be held in trust 
                under section 3(e) of the Mni Wiconi Project 
                Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2568).
            (2) Uses.--The Department shall maintain and 
        develop the land outside the recreation areas for fish 
        and wildlife purposes in accordance with--
                    (A) fish and wildlife purposes in effect on 
                the date of enactment of this Act; or
                    (B) a plan developed under section 602.
            (3) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not 
        interfere with the Corps of Engineers operation of a 
        project under this section for an authorized purpose of 
        the project under the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
        Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.), or 
        other applicable law.
            (4) Secretary.--The Secretary shall retain the 
        right to inundate with water the land transferred to 
        the Department under this section or draw down a 
        project reservoir, as necessary to carry out an 
        authorized purpose of a project.
    (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this 
subsection is land that--
            (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood 
        pool of the Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's 
        Point projects of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
        program;
            (2) was acquired by the Secretary for the 
        implementation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
        program;
            (3) is located outside the external boundaries of a 
        reservation of an Indian Tribe; and
            (4) is located within the State of South Dakota.
    (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area 
described in this section includes the land and facilities 
within a recreation area that--
            (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the 
        transfer, is a recreation area classified for 
        recreation use by the Corps of Engineers on the date of 
        enactment of this Act;
            (2) is located outside the external boundaries of a 
        reservation of an Indian Tribe;
            (3) is located within the State of South Dakota;
            (4) is not the recreation area known as 
        ``Cottonwood'', ``Training Dike'', or ``Tailwaters''; 
        and
            (5) is located below Gavin's Point Dam in the State 
        of South Dakota in accordance with boundary agreements 
        and reciprocal fishing agreements between the State of 
        South Dakota and the State of Nebraskain effect on the 
date of enactment of this Act, which agreements shall continue to be 
honored by the State of South Dakota as the agreements apply to any 
land or recreation areas transferred under this title to the State of 
South Dakota below Gavin's Point Dam and on the waters of the Missouri 
River.
    (d) Map.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the Department, shall prepare a map of the land 
        and recreation areas transferred under this section.
            (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
                    (A) land reasonably expected to be required 
                for project purposes during the 20-year period 
                beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; 
                and
                    (B) dams and related structures;
        which shall be retained by the Secretary.
            (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the 
        appropriate offices of the Secretary.
    (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
        Army and the Secretary of the Department shall jointly 
        develop a schedule for transferring the land and 
        recreation areas under this section.
            (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation 
        areas shall be transferred not later than 1 year after 
        the full capitalization of the Trust Fund described in 
        section 603.
    (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas 
described in subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred in 
fee title to the Department on the following conditions:
            (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall 
        not be responsible for any damage to the land caused by 
        flooding, sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the 
        land caused by the operation of any project of the 
        Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program (except as 
        otherwise provided by Federal law).
            (2) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-
        sharing agreements.--The Department shall maintain all 
        easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
        agreements that are in effect as of the date of the 
        transfer.
    (g) Hunting and Fishing.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in this 
        section, nothing in this title affects jurisdiction 
        over the waters of the Missouri River below the water's 
        edge and outside the exterior boundaries of an Indian 
        reservation in South Dakota.
            (2) Jurisdiction.--
                    (A) Transferred land.--On transfer of the 
                land under this section to the State of South 
                Dakota, jurisdiction over the land shall be the 
                same as that over other land owned by the State 
                of South Dakota.
                    (B) Land between the missouri river water's 
                edge and the level of the exclusive flood 
                pool.--Jurisdiction over land between the 
                Missouri River water's edge and the level of 
                the exclusive flood pool outside Indian 
                reservations in the State of South Dakota shall 
                be the same as that exercised by the State on 
                other land owned by the State, and that 
                jurisdiction shall follow the fluctuations of 
                the water's edge.
                    (C) Federal land.--Jurisdiction over land 
                and water owned by the Federal Government 
                within the boundaries of the State of South 
                Dakota that are not affected by this title 
                shall remain unchanged.
            (3) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall 
        provide the State of South Dakota with easements and 
        access on land and water below the level of the 
        exclusive flood pool outside Indian reservations in the 
        State of South Dakota for recreational and other 
        purposes (including for boat docks, boat ramps, and 
        related structures), so long as the easements would not 
        prevent the Corps of Engineers from carrying out its 
        mission under the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
        construction of certain public works on rivers and 
        harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
        approved December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the 
        ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887)).
    (h) Applicability of Law.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this Act, the following provisions of law shall 
apply to land transferred under this section:
            (1) The National Historic Preservation Act (16 
        U.S.C. 470 et seq.), including sections 106 and 304 of 
        that Act (16 U.S.C. 470f, 470w-3).
            (2) The Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 
        1979 (16 U.S.C. 470aa et seq.), including sections 4, 
        6, 7, and 9 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 470cc, 470ee, 470ff, 
        470hh).
            (3) The Native American Graves Protection Act and 
        Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), including 
        subsections (a) and (d) of section 3 of that Act (25 
        U.S.C. 3003).
    (i) Impact Aid.--The land transferred under subsection (a) 
shall be deemed to continue to be owned by the United States 
for purposes of section 8002 of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702).

SEC. 606. TRANSFER OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAND FOR INDIAN TRIBES.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Transfer.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
        transfer to the Secretary of the Interior the land and 
        recreation areas described in subsections (b) and (c) 
        for the use of the Indian Tribes in perpetuity.
            (2) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not 
        interfere with the Corps of Engineers operation of a 
        project under this section for an authorized purpose of 
        the project under the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
        Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.), or 
        other applicable law.
            (3) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the 
        Army shall retain the right to inundate with water the 
        land transferred to the Secretary of the Interior under 
        this section or draw down a project reservoir, as 
        necessary to carry out an authorized purpose of a 
        project.
            (4) Trust.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        hold in trust for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe the land transferred under 
        this section that is located within the external 
        boundaries of the reservation of the Indian Tribes.
    (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this 
subsection is land that--
            (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood 
        pool of the Big Bend and Oahe projects of the Pick-
        Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
            (2) was acquired by the Secretary of the Army for 
        the implementation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River 
        Basin program; and
            (3) is located within the external boundaries of 
        the reservation of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe.
    (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area 
described in this section includes the land and facilities 
within a recreation area that--
            (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the 
        transfer, is a recreation area classified for 
        recreationuse by the Corps of Engineers on the date of 
enactment of this Act;
            (2) is located within the external boundaries of a 
        reservation of an Indian Tribe; and
            (3) is located within the State of South Dakota.
    (d) Map.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the governing bodies of the Cheyenne River Sioux 
        Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, shall prepare a 
        map of the land transferred under this section.
            (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
                    (A) land reasonably expected to be required 
                for project purposes during the 20-year period 
                beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; 
                and
                    (B) dams and related structures;
        which shall be retained by the Secretary.
            (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the 
        appropriate offices of the Secretary.
    (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the 
        Chairmen of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the 
        Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall jointly develop a 
        schedule for transferring the land and recreation areas 
        under this section.
            (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation 
        areas shall be transferred not later than 1 year after 
        the full capitalization of the State and tribal Trust 
        Fund described in section 604.
    (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas 
described in subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred to, 
and held in trust by, the Secretary of the Interior on the 
following conditions:
            (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall 
        not be responsible for any damage to the land caused by 
        flooding, sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the 
        land caused by the operation of any project of the 
        Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program (except as 
        otherwise provided by Federal law).
            (2) Hunting and fishing.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in this 
                section, nothing in this title affects 
                jurisdiction over the waters of the Missouri 
                River below the water's edge and within the 
                exterior boundaries of the Cheyenne River Sioux 
                and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe reservations.
                    (B) Jurisdiction.--
                            (i) In general.--On transfer of the 
                        land to the respective tribes under 
                        this section, jurisdiction over the 
                        land and on land between the water's 
                        edge and the level of the exclusive 
                        flood pool within the respective 
                        Tribe's reservation boundaries shall be 
                        the same as that over land held in 
                        trust by the Secretary of the Interior 
                        on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation 
                        and the Lower Brule Sioux Reservation, 
                        and that jurisdiction shall follow the 
                        fluctuations of the water's edge.
                            (ii) Jurisdiction unaffected.--
                        Jurisdiction over land and water owned 
                        by the Federal Government and held in 
                        trust for the Cheyenne River Sioux 
                        Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe that 
                        is not affected by this title shall 
                        remain unchanged.
                    (C) Easements and access.--The Secretary 
                shall provide the Tribes with such easements 
                and access on land and water below the level of 
                the exclusive flood pool inside the respective 
                Indian reservations for recreational and other 
                purposes (including for boat docks, boat ramps, 
                and related structures), so long as the 
                easements would not prevent the Corps of 
                Engineers from carrying out its mission under 
                the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
                construction of certain public works on rivers 
                and harbors for flood control, and for other 
                purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 
                (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 
                1944'') (58 Stat. 887)).
            (3) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-
        sharing agreements.--
                    (A) Maintenance.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior shall maintain all easements, rights-
                of-way, leases, and cost-sharing agreements 
                that are in effect as of the date of the 
                transfer.
                    (B) Payments to county.--The Secretary of 
                the Interior shall pay any affected county 100 
                percent of the receipts from the easements, 
                rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
                agreements described in subparagraph (A).
    (g) Exterior Indian Reservation Boundaries.--Nothing in 
this section diminishes, changes, or otherwise affects the 
exterior boundaries of a reservation of an Indian Tribe.

SEC. 607. ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Nothing in this title diminishes or 
affects--
            (1) any water right of an Indian Tribe;
            (2) any other right of an Indian Tribe, except as 
        specifically provided in another provision of this 
        title;
            (3) any treaty right that is in effect on the date 
        of enactment of this Act;
            (4) any external boundary of an Indian reservation 
        of an Indian Tribe;
            (5) any authority of the State of South Dakota that 
        relates to the protection, regulation, or management of 
        fish, terrestrial wildlife, and cultural and 
        archaeological resources, except as specifically 
        provided in this title; or
            (6) any authority of the Secretary, the Secretary 
        of the Interior, or the head of any other Federal 
        agency under a law in effect on the date of enactment 
        of this Act, including--
                    (A) the National Historic Preservation Act 
                (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.);
                    (B) the Archaeological Resources Protection 
                Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470aa et seq.);
                    (C) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 
                (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.);
                    (D) the Act entitled ``An Act for the 
                protection of the bald eagle'', approved June 
                8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.);
                    (E) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 
                U.S.C. 703 et seq.);
                    (F) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
                U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
                    (G) the Native American Graves Protection 
                and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
                    (H) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (commonly known as the ``Clean Water Act'') (33 
                U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
                    (I) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 
                300f et seq.); and
                    (J) the National Environmental Policy Act 
                of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (b) Federal Liability for Damage.--Nothing in this title 
relieves the Federal Government of liability for damage to 
private property caused by the operation of the Pick-Sloan 
Missouri River Basin program.
    (c) Flood Control.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this title, the Secretary shall retain the authority to operate 
the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program for purposes of 
meeting the requirements of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.).

SEC. 608. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall arrange for the United 
States Geological Survey, in consultation with the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs and other appropriate Federal agencies, to 
complete, not later than October 31, 1999, a comprehensive 
study of the potential impacts of the transfer of land under 
sections 605(b) and 606(b), including potential impacts on 
South Dakota Sioux Tribes having water claims within the 
Missouri River Basin, on water flows in the Missouri River.
    (b) No Transfer Pending Determination.--No transfer of land 
under section 605(b) or 606(b) shall occur until the Secretary 
determines, based on the study, that the transfer of land under 
either section will not significantly reduce the amount of 
water flow to the downstream States of the Missouri River.
    (c) State Water Rights.--The results of the study shall not 
affect, and shall not be taken into consideration in, any 
proceeding to quantify the water rights of any State.
    (d) Indian Water Rights.--The results of the study shall 
not affect, and shall not be taken into consideration in, any 
proceeding to quantify the water rights of any Indian Tribe or 
tribal nation.

SEC. 609. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Secretary.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
the Secretary such sums as are necessary--
            (1) to pay the administrative expenses incurred by 
        the Secretary in carrying out this title;
            (2) to fund the implementation of terrestrial 
        wildlife habitat restoration plans under section 602(a) 
        and other activities under sections 603(d)(3) and 
        604(d)(3); and
            (3) to fund the annual expenses (not to exceed the 
        Federal cost as of the date of enactment of this Act) 
        of operating recreation areas to be transferred under 
        sections 605(c) and 606(c) or leased by the State of 
        South Dakota or Indian Tribes, until such time as the 
        trust funds under sections 603 and 604 are fully 
        capitalized.
    (b) Secretary of the Interior.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as are 
necessary to pay the administrative expenses incurred by the 
Secretary of the Interior in carrying out this title.
      And the House agree to the same.

                                   Bud Shuster,
                                   Don Young,
                                   Sherwood Boehlert,
                                   Richard H. Baker,
                                   John T. Doolittle,
                                   Don Sherwood,
                                   James L. Oberstar,
                                   Robert A. Borski,
                                   Ellen Tauscher,
                                   Brian Baird,
                                 Managers on the Part of the House.

                                   John H. Chafee,
                                   John Warner,
                                   Bob Smith,
                                   George V. Voinovich,
                                   Max Baucus,
                                   Daniel Moynihan,
                                Managers on the Part of the Senate.

       JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE

      The Managers on the part of the House and Senate at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the 
amendment of the House to the bill (S. 507), to provide for the 
conservation and development of water and related resources, to 
authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
projects for other purposes, submit the following joint 
statement to the House and Senate in explanation of the effect 
of the action agreed upon by the managers and recommended in 
the accompanying conference report:
      The House amendment struck all of the Senate bill after 
the enacting clause and inserted a substitute text.
      The Senate recedes from its disagreement to the amendment 
of the House with an amendment that is a substitute for the 
Senate bill and the House amendment. The differences between 
the Senate bill, the House amendment, and the substitute agreed 
to in conference are noted below, except for clerical 
corrections, conforming changes made necessary by agreements 
reached by the conferees, and minor drafting and clerical 
changes.

                   Title I--Water Resources Projects

                  section 101. project authorizations.

101(a) Projects with Chief's Reports
      101(a)(1) Nome Harbor Improvements, Alaska. House 
Sec. 101(b)(1), Senate Sec. 101(b)(1).--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.
      101(a)(2) Sand Point Harbor, Alaska. House 
Sec. 101(a)(1), Senate Sec. 101(a)(1).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(3) Seward Harbor, Alaska. House Sec. 101(b)(2), 
Senate Sec. 101(b)(2).--Senate recedes with an amendment.
      101(a)(4) Rio Salado, Salt River, Phoenix and Tempe, 
Arizona. House Sec. 101(a)(2), Senate Sec. 101(a)(2).--Senate 
recedes.
      101(a)(5) Tucson Drainage Area, Arizona. House 
Sec. 101(a)(3), Senate Sec. 101(a)(3).--House recedes.
      101(a)(6) American and Sacramento Rivers, California. 
House Sec. 101(a)(4), Senate Sec. 101(a)(4).--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.
      101(a)(7) Oakland Harbor, California. House 
Sec. 101(a)(5), Senate Sec. 101(b)(5).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(8) South Sacramento County Streams, California. 
House Sec. 101(a)(6), Senate Sec. 101(a)(6).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(9) Upper Guadalupe River, California. House 
Sec. 101(a)(7), Senate Sec. 101(a)(7).--House recedes.
      101(a)(10) Yuba River Basin, California. House 
Sec. 101(a)(8), Senate Sec. 101(a)(8).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(11) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
Jersey-Broadkill Beach, Delaware. House Sec. 101(a)(9), Senate 
Sec. 101(a)(9).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(12) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
Jersey-Port Mahon, Delaware. House Sec. 101(a)(10), Senate 
Sec. 101(a)(10).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(13) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware. House 
Sec. 101(a)(11), Senate Sec. 101(b)(7).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(14) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
Jersey: Villas and Vicinity, New Jersey. House Sec. 101(a)(12), 
Senate Sec. 101(b)(16).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(15) Delaware Coast from Cape Henelopen to Fenwick 
Island, Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, Delaware. House 
Sec. 101(a)(13), Senate Sec. 101(b)(8).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(16) Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida. 
Senate Sec. 101(a)(11). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      101(a)(17) Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. House 
Sec. 101(a)(14), Senate Sec. 101(b)(9).--House recedes.
      The conferees understand the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers for the navigation project at Jacksonville Harbor, 
Florida, recognizes that a re-evaluation of the project based 
on a potential change in the commercial navigation fleet could 
result in redesignation of the locally preferred plan as the 
National Economic Development Plan. Furthermore, if the locally 
preferred plan is redesignated as the National Economic 
Development Plan, cost sharing for the recommended plan shall 
be in accordance with section 101 of the Water Development Act 
of 1986.
      101(a)(18) Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida. House 
Sec. 101(a)(15), Senate Sec. 101(a)(14).--House recedes.
      101(a)(19) Brunswick Harbor, Georgia. House 
Sec. 101(a)(16), Senate Sec. 101(a)(15).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(20) Beargrass Creek, Kentucky. House 
Sec. 101(a)(17), Senate Sec. 101(a)(16).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(21) Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East 
Baton Rouge Parish Watershed. House Sec. 101(a)(18), Senate 
Sec. 101(a)(17).--House recedes.
      101(a)(22) Baltimore Harbor Anchorages and Channels, 
Maryland and Virginia. House Sec. 101(a)(19), Senate 
Sec. 101(a)(18).--House recedes.
      101(a)(23) Red River Lake at Crookston, Minnesota. House 
Sec. 101(a)(20), Senate Sec. 101(a)(19).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(24) Turkey Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and 
Kansas City, Kansas. House Sec. 101(a)(21), Senate 
Sec. 101(b)(13).--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(25) Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New 
Jersey. House Sec. 101(a)(22), Senate Sec. 101(b)(17).--House 
recedes with an amendment.
      101(a)(26) Townsends Inlet to Cape May Inlet, New Jersey. 
House Sec. 101(a)(23), Senate Sec. 101(a)(20).--House recedes 
with an amendment.
      101(a)(27) Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico. House 
Sec. 101(a)(24). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(28) Rio Grande de Manati, Barceloneta, Puerto 
Rico. House Sec. 101(a)(25). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      101(a)(29) Rio Nigua at Salinas, Puerto Rico. House 
Sec. 101(a)(26). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      101(a)(30) Salt Creek, Graham, Texas. House 
Sec. 101(a)(27), Senate Sec. 101(a)(22).--Senate recedes.
101(b) Projects subject to report
      The conference report includes project authorizations for 
which the Chief of Engineers has not yet completed a final 
report, but for which such reports are anticipated by December 
31, 1999. These projects have been included in order to assure 
that projects anticipated to satisfy the necessary technical 
documentation by December 31, 1999 are not delayed in each case 
that the final reports can be completed by the end of 1999.
      101(b)(1) Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      101(b)(2) Arroyo Pasajero, California. House Sec. 518(1), 
Senate Sec. 101(b)(3).--House recedes.
      The conferees understand that there may be potentially 
significant impacts on endangered species and state ecological 
reserve lands. Consequently, the conferees believe that a full 
range of reasonable alternatives should be considered.
      101(b)(3) Hamilton Airfield, California. House 
Sec. 101(b)(3), Senate Sec. 101(b)(4).--House recedes.
      In the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Congress 
provided that publicly or privately owned upland sites may be 
considered for dredged material disposal. The Secretary should 
consider developing a management plan that addresses the 
equitable distribution of the dredged material in the San 
Francisco Bay area to various upland sites in cases where 
dredged material from Corps of Engineers construction or 
maintenance dredging is available for beneficial use or other 
upland disposal methods. In comparing the costs and benefits of 
public and private disposal options, the Secretary shall 
consider all costs and benefits, including all publicly funded 
costs, to ensure that an objective and equitable comparison of 
private and public facilities occurs.
      101(b)(4) Success Dam, Tule River Basin, California. 
House Sec. 518(2), Senate Sec. 101(b)(6).--House recedes with 
an amendment.
      101(b)(5) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
Jersey: Oakwood Beach, New Jersey. House Sec. 101(b)(4), Senate 
Sec. 101(b)(14).--House recedes with an amendment.
      101(b)(6) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
Jersey: Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New Jersey. House 
Sec. 101(b)(5), Senate Sec. 101(b)(15).--Senate recedes.
      101(b)(7) Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida. 
House Sec. 101(b)(6), Senate Sec. 101(b)(10).--Senate recedes.
      101(b)(8) Ponce de Leon Inlet, Florida. House 
Sec. 101(b)(7), Senate Sec. 101(b)(11).--Senate recedes.
      101(b)(9) Savannah Harbor Expansion, Georgia. House 
Sec. 101(b)(8), Senate Sec. 101(b)(12).--Senate recedes.
      101(b)(10) Des Plaines River, Illinois. House 
Sec. 101(b)(9). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.
      101(b)(11) Reelfoot Lake, Kentucky and Tennessee. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      101(b)(12) Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor, 
Brigantine Island, New Jersey. House Sec. 101(b)(10), Senate 
Sec. 101(b)(18).--Senate recedes with an amendment.
      101(b)(13) Columbia River Channel, Oregon and Washington. 
House Sec. 101(b)(11), Senate Sec. 101(b)(19).--Senate recedes.
      101(b)(14) Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. House 
Sec. 101(b)(12), Senate Sec. 101(b)(21).--Senate recedes.
      101(b)(15) Howard Hanson Dam, Washington. House 
Sec. 101(b)(13), Senate Sec. 101(b)(22).--House recedes.
      The managers recognize that the cost sharing for the 
Howard Hanson Dam project could appropriately be affected by 
the recent listing of the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon as a 
protected species under the Endangered Species Act. The United 
States Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries 
Service, has stated its intent to consult with both the Army 
Corps of Engineers and the City of Tacoma concerning 
responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act as it relates 
to the Howard Hanson Dam project and the City of Tacoma water 
diversion project. One of the purposes of the project being 
authorized is to develop a fish passage for downstream 
migration of salmon. When this consultation process is 
completed, the appropriate cost sharing allocation for the 
project may be different from that stated in the report of the 
Chief of Engineers. Therefore, it is the understanding of the 
managers that the Secretary, after consultation with the 
Secretary of Commerce, will, if appropriate, revise the 
allocation of cost sharing found in the final report of the 
Chief of Engineers to reflect the responsibilities under the 
Endangered Species Act for the protection of the threatened 
Puget Sound Chinook Salmon.

                 Sec. 102. Small Flood Control Projects

      102(a)(1) Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska. Senate Sec. 322. 
No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      102(a)(2) Salcha River and Piledriver Slough, Fairbanks, 
Alaska. Senate Sec. 321. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      102(a)(3) Lancaster, California. House Sec. 102(a)(1). No 
comparable Senate Section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(4) Magpie Creek. California. No comparable House 
or Senate section.
      102(a)(5) Gateway Triangle Area, Collier County, Florida. 
House Sec. 102(a)(2), Senate Sec. 104(1).--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(6) Plant City, Florida. House Sec. 102(a)(3), 
Senate Sec. 104(m).--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(7) Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida. House 
Sec. 102(a)(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(8) Ohio River, Illinois. House Sec. 102(a)(5). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(9) Hamilton Dam, Michigan. Senate Sec. 327. No 
comparable House section.--House recedes.
      102(a)(10) Repaupo Creek, New Jersey. House 
Sec. 102(a)(6), Senate Sec. 303(2).--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.
      102(a)(11) Irondequoit Creek, New York. Senate 
Sec. 303(3). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      102(a)(12) Owasco Lake Seawall, New York. House 
Sec. 102(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(13) Port Clinton, Ohio. House Sec. 102(a)(8). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(14) Abington Township, Pennsylvania. House 
Sec. 102(a)(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(15) Port Indian, West Norriton Township, 
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. House Sec. 102(a)(11). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(16) Port Providence, Upper Providence Township, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 102(a)(12). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(17) Springfield Township, Montgomery County, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 102(a)(13). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(18) Tawney Run Creek, Pennsylvania. No comparable 
House or Senate section.
      102(a)(19) Wissahickon Watershed, Pennsylvania. No 
comparable House or Senate section.
      102(a)(20) Tioga County, Pennsylvania. Senate 
Sec. 303(3). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      102(a)(21) First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee. House 
Sec. 102(a)14. No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(a)(22) Metro Center Levee, Cumberland River, 
Nashville, Tennessee. House Sec. 102(a)15). No comparable 
Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      102(b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. House 
Sec. 102(b). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.
      102(b) Subsection (b) provides that the maximum Federal 
expenditure for the Festus and Crystal City, Missouri flood 
control project shall be $10,000,000 and directs the Secretary 
to make corresponding changes to the project cooperation 
agreement. Nothing in this subsection affects any applicable 
cost sharing requirements under the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986.

              Sec. 103. Small Bank Stabilization Projects

      103(a)(1) Arctic Ocean, Barrow, Alaska. Senate 
Sec. 305(a). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      103(a)(2) Saint Joseph River Indiana. House Sec. 103(1). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      103(a)(3) Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan. House 
Sec. 103(2), Senate Sec. 305(b).--Senate recedes.
      103(a)(4) Big Timber Creek, New Jersey. House 
Sec. 103(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      103(a)(5) Lake Shore Road, Athol Springs, New York. House 
Sec. 103(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      103(a)(6) Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York. House 
Sec. 101(5). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      103(a)(7) Monroe County, Ohio. House Sec. 103(6). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      103(a)(8) Green Valley, West Virginia. House Sec. 103(7). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      103(b) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana. Senate 
Sec. 305(c). No comparable House section.--House recedes.

                  Sec. 104. Small Navigation Projects

      104(1) Grand Marais, Arkansas. House Sec. 104(1). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(2) Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor, 
California. House Sec. 104(2), Senate Sec. 104(e).--Senate 
recedes.
      104(3) San Mateo (Pillar Point Harbor), California. House 
Sec. 104(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(4) Agana Marina, Guam. House Sec. 104(4), Senate 
Sec. 104(yy).--Senate recedes.
      104(5) Agat Marina, Guam. House Sec. 104(5), Senate 
Sec. 104(vv).--Senate recedes.
      104(6) Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam. House Sec. 104(6), 
Senate Sec. 104(xx).--Senate recedes.
      104(7) Apra Harbor Pier F-6, Guam. House Sec. 104(7). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(8) Apra Harbor Seawall, Guam. House Sec. 104(8), 
Senate Sec. 104(ww).--Senate recedes.
      104(9) Guam Harbor, Guam. House Sec. 104(9). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(10) Illinois River Near Chautauqua Park, Illinois. 
House Sec. 104(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      104(11) Whiting Shoreline Waterfront, Whiting, Indiana. 
House Sec. 104(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      104(12) Union River, Ellsworth, Maine. House 
Sec. 104(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(13) Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine. House 
Sec. 104(12). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(14) Detroit Waterfront, Michigan. House Sec. 104(14). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(15) Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey. House 
Sec. 104(15), Senate Sec. 304(9).--Senate recedes.
      104(16) Braddock Bay, Greece, New York. Senate 
Sec. 304(10). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
      104(17) Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York. House 
Sec. 104(16). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(18) Sturgeon Point, New York. House Sec. 104(17). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      104(19) Fairpoint Harbor, Ohio. House Sec. 104(18). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

      Sec. 105. Small Projects for Improvement of the Environment

      House Sec. 105(a). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.
      105(b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California. House 
Sec. 105(b), Senate Sec. 332.--House recedes.

         Sec. 106. Small Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Projects

      106(1) Contra Costa County, Bay Delta, California. House 
Sec. 106(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(2) Indian River, Florida. House Sec. 106(2). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(3) Little Wekiva River, Florida. House Sec. 106(3). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(4) Cook County, Illinois. House Sec. 106(4). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(5) Grand Batture Island, Mississippi. House 
Sec. 106(5). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(6) Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
Mississippi. House Sec. 106(6). No comparable Senate section.--
Senate recedes.
      106(7) Mississippi River and River Des Peres, St. Louis, 
Missouri. House Sec. 106(7), Senate Sec. 201(e)(3).--Senate 
recedes.
      106(8) Hudson River, New York. House Sec. 106(8). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(9) Oneida Lake, New York. House Sec. 106(9). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(10) Otsego Lake, New York. House Sec. 106(10). No 
comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(11) North Fork of Yellow Creek, Ohio. House 
Sec. 106(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(12) Wheeling Creek Watershed, Ohio. House 
Sec. 106(12). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(13) Springfield Millrace, Oregon. House Sec. 106(13), 
Senate Sec. 306.--Senate recedes.
      106(14) Upper Amazon Creek, Oregon. House Sec. 106(14). 
No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
      106(15) Lake Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks County, 
Pennsylvania. House Sec. 106(15). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.
      106(16) Blackstone River Basin, Rhode Island and 
Massachusetts. House Sec. 106(16). No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes.

                      Title II--General Provisions

                Sec. 201. Small Flood Control Authority.

      House Sec. 201, Senate Sec. 203.--House recedes.

  Sec. 202. Use of Non-Federal Funds for Compiling and Disseminating 
                Information on Floods and Flood Damages

      House Sec. 202, Senate Sec. 204.--House recedes.

      Sec. 203. Contributions by States and Political Subdivisions

      House Sec. 203, Senate Sec. 207.--House recedes.

             Sec. 204. Sediment Decontamination Technology

      House Sec. 204, Senate Sec. 218.--Senate recedes.

                  Sec. 205. Control of Aquatic Plants

      House Sec. 205, Senate Sec. 214.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

  Sec. 206. Use of Continuing Contracts Required for Construction of 
                            Certain Projects

      House Sec. 206. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

  Sec. 207. Water Resources Development Studies for the Pacific Region

      House Sec. 208, Senate Sec. 209.--Senate recedes.

      Sec. 208. Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration

      House Sec. 209, Senate Sec. 331, Senate Sec. 102(k) and 
Senate Sec. 309.--Senate recedes to the House with an amendment 
to subsections (a) and (b) and a new subsection (d).

             Sec. 209. Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material

      House Sec. 210, Senate Sec. 206.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

                Sec. 210. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration

      House Sec. 212, Senate Sec. 205.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

      Sec. 211. Watershed Management, Restoration, and Development

      House Sec. 213, Senate Sec. 216.--House recedes with 
amendments at subsections (1) and (3).
      Under this section, the managers support providing 
technical assistance to the non-Federal interests in the 
communities of Springfield and Decatur, Illinois in the 
Illinois River Watershed for the purpose of identifying high 
nitrate levels in water supplies and assisting with methods for 
reducing such levels.

   Sec. 212. Flood Mitigation and Riverine Restoration Pilot Program

      House Sec. 214, Senate Sec. 201.--Senate recedes to the 
House with amendments at subsections (b), (e), (g), and (h).

                   Sec. 213. Shore Management Program

      House Sec. 215. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

            Sec. 214. Shore Damage Prevention or Mitigation

      House Sec. 217, Senate Sec. 228.--House recedes with 
amendment.

                       Sec. 215. Shore Protection

      House Sec. 218(a), Senate Sec. 202.--House recedes with 
an amendment.
      House Sec. 218(b), Senate Sec. 211(a).--Senate recedes.
      Senate Sec. 211(b). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.
      House Sec. 218(c). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.
      House Sec. 218(d). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                Sec. 216. Flood Prevention Coordination

      House Sec. 219. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           Sec. 217. Disposal of Dredged Material on Beaches

      Senate Sec. 219. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

                 Sec. 218. Annual Passes for Recreation

      House Sec. 220. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             Sec. 219. Nonstructural Flood Control Projects

      House Sec. 222, Senate Sec. 213.--Senate recedes.

                        Sec. 220. Lakes Program

      House Sec. 223, Senate Sec. 217.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

          Sec. 221. Enhancement of Fish and Wildlife Resources

      House Sec. 225, Senate Sec. 220.--Senate recedes.

       Sec. 222. Purchase of American-made Equipment and Products

      House Sec. 226. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    Sec. 223. Construction of Flood Control Projects by non-Federal 
                                Interest

      House Sec. 224, Senate Sec. 221.--Senate recedes with 
amendments.

                    Sec. 224. Environmental Dredging

      House Sec. 228, Senate Sec. 212.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

                    Sec. 225. Recreational User Fees

      Senate Sec. 208. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

            Sec. 226. Small Storm Damage Reduction Projects

      Senate Sec. 227. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                  Sec. 227. Use of Private Enterprises

      Senate Sec. 232. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

                 Title III--Project Related Provisions

Sec. 301. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, Alabama and 
                              Mississippi

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                   Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska

      House Sec. 302. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes to House with an amendment.

              Sec. 303. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska

      No comparable House or Senate section.

     Sec. 304. Loggy Bayou, Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, 
                     Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas

      House Sec. 305. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes to House with an amendment.

          Sec. 305. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California

      House Sec. 306. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 306. San Lorenzo River, California

      House Sec. 307, Senate Sec. 102(a)(1).--House recedes 
with an amendment.

            Sec. 307. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California

      House Sec. 308. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

Sec. 308. Delaware River, Mainstem and Channel Deepening, Delaware, New 
                        Jersey, and Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 309. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       Sec. 309. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia

      House Sec. 310. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                   Sec. 310. Brevard County, Florida

      House Sec. 311. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

         Sec. 311. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida

      House Sec. 312. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 Sec. 312. Lee County, Captiva Island Segment, Florida, Periodic Beach 
                              Nourishment

      House Sec. 227(a), Senate Sec. 102(u).--House recedes.

                     Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida

      House Sec. 313, Senate Sec. 102(b)(1).--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.

                    Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida

      House Sec. 314. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 315. Miami Harbor Channel, Florida

      House Sec. 315. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                    Sec. 316. St. Augustine, Florida

      House Sec. 363(d), Senate Sec. 102(a)(2).--Senate 
recedes.

                      Sec. 317. Milo Creek, Idaho

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                   Sec. 318. Lake Michigan, Illinois

      House Sec. 316, Senate Sec. 102(l).--House recedes.

                    Sec. 319. Springfield, Illinois

      House Sec. 317. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     Sec. 320. Ogden Dunes, Indiana

      House Sec. 319. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

           Sec. 321. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana

      House Sec. 320. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     Sec. 322. White River, Indiana

      House Sec. 321, Senate Sec. 102(s).--House recedes.

                        Sec. 323. Dubuque, Iowa

      Senate Sec. 102(n). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                Sec. 324. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana

      House Sec. 322, Senate Sec. 104(y).--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.

              Sec. 325. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana

      House Sec. 323, Senate Sec. 104(w).--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.

         Sec. 326. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Lousiana

      House Sec. 324, Senate Sec. 102(o).--House recedes.

          Sec. 327. Twelve-Mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana

      House Sec. 325, Senate Sec. 104(a).--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.

 Sec. 328. West Bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
                               Louisiana

      House Sec. 326. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

        Sec. 329. Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland

      House Sec. 327, Senate Sec. 102(d).--House recedes.

        Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan

      House Sec. 328. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 Sec. 331. Jackson County, Mississippi

      House Sec. 329, Senate Sec. 102(p).--House recedes.

       Sec. 332. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri

      House Sec. 331. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       Sec. 333. Meramec River Basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri

      House Sec. 332. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 Sec. 334. Missouri River Mitigation Project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, 
                              and Nebraska

      House Sec. 333. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              Sec. 335. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska

      House Sec. 334, Senate Sec. 102(a)(3).--Senate recedes.

                  Sec. 336. Absecon Island, New Jersey

      House Sec. 335, Senate Sec. 102(a)(4).--Senate recedes.

   Sec. 337. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey, New 
                                 Jersey

      House Sec. 336, Senate Sec. 102(b)(4).--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.

             Sec. 338. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey

      House Sec. 339, Senate Sec. 102(a)(5).--House recedes 
with an amendment.

   Sec. 339. Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and New 
                                 Jersey

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                   Sec. 340. New York City Watershed

      House Sec. 340, Senate Sec. 325.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

                 Sec. 341. New York State Canal System

      House Sec. 341. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York

      House Sec. 342. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

          Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma

      House Sec. 343. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  Sec. 344. Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
                                 Oregon

      House Sec. 344, Senate Sec. 102(b)(5).--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.

               Sec. 345. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 346. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

          Sec. 346. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware

      House Sec. 347. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                  Sec. 347. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 348. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  Sec. 348. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

      No comparable House or Senate section.

        Sec. 349. Nine-Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 349, Senate Sec. 316.--House recedes.

                 Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 350. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                 Sec. 351. South Central, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 351. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     Sec. 352. Foxpoint Hurricane Barrier, Providence, Rhode Island

      Senate Sec. 102(t). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

       Sec. 353. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina

      House Sec. 352, Senate Sec. 102(f).--House recedes.

                      Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas

      House Sec. 354. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                     Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas

      House Sec. 355. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           Sec. 356. Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas

      House Sec. 356, Senate Sec. 102(g).--Senate recedes.

                   Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah

      House Sec. 357. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

            Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia

      House Sec. 358, Senate Sec. 102(i).--House recedes.

        Sec. 359. Columbia River Channel, Washington and Oregon

      Senate Sec. 102(v). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

               Sec. 360. Greenbrier Basin, West Virginia

      House Sec. 360. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

       Sec. 361. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia

      House Sec. 359. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  Sec. 362. Moorefield, West Virginia

      House Sec. 361, Senate Sec. 102(j).--Senate recedes.

         Sec. 363. West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control

      House Sec. 362. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   Sec. 364. Project Reauthorizations

      House Sec. 363(b), (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), Senate 
Sec. 101(a)(12), (13), (21) and (b)(20).--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.

                   Sec. 365. Project Deauthorizations

      House Sec. 364(a)(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), 
(9), (10), (11), (12), (b), (c), Senate Sec. 103(a), (b), (c), 
(d), (e), (f), and 102(b)(3).--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

          Sec. 366. American and Sacramento Rivers, California

      House Sec. 365. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                       Sec. 367. Martin, Kentucky

      House Sec. 366. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             Sec. 368. Southern West Virginia Pilot Program

      House Sec. 367. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     Sec. 369. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Jackson, Alabama

      House Sec. 368. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

           Sec. 370. Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada

      House Sec. 369, Senate Sec. 102(e).--House recedes.

                   Sec. 371. Comite River, Louisiana

      House Sec. 370. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  Sec. 372. St. Marys River, Michigan

      House Sec. 371. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     Sec. 373. Charlevoix, Michigan

      House Sec. 372, Senate Sec. 326.--House recedes.

           Sec. 374. White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri

      Senate Sec. 104(d). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

     Sec. 375. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, Water Conveyance Facilities

      House Sec. 555, Senate Sec. 102(a)(6).--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.

                           Title IV--Studies

                Sec. 401. Deep Draft Harbor Cost Sharing

      House Sec. 211. No comparable Senate section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

                     Sec. 402. Boydsville, Arkansas

      Senate Sec. 104(b). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 Sec. 403. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas

      House Sec. 303. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                 Sec. 404. Del Norte County, California

      House Sec. 428. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           Sec. 405. Frazier Creek, Tulare County, California

      Senate Sec. 104(f). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                Sec. 406. Mare Island Strait, California

      No comparable House or Senate section.

            Sec. 407. Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California

      Senate Sec. 104(g). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

      Sec. 408. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California

      House Sec. 404. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              Sec. 409. Whitewater River Basin, California

      House Sec. 405. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 410. Destin-Noriega Point, Florida

      Senate Sec. 104(k). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         Sec. 411. Little Econlackhatchee River Basin, Florida

      House Sec. 406. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                Sec. 412. Port Everglades Inlet, Florida

      House Sec. 407, Senate Sec. 104(j).--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.

  Sec. 413. Lake Allatoona, Etowah River, and Little River Watershed, 
                                Georgia

      House Sec. 533. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                         Sec. 414. Boise, Idaho

      Senate Sec. 104(n). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

             Sec. 415. Goose Creek Watershed, Oakley, Idaho

      Senate Sec. 104(o). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

              Sec. 416. Little Wood River, Goodling, Idaho

      Senate Sec. 104(p). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 Sec. 417. Snake River, Lewiston, Idaho

      Senate Sec. 104(q). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

             Sec. 418. Snake River and Payette River, Idaho

      Senate Sec. 104(r). No comparable House Section.--House 
recedes.

    Sec. 419. Upper Des Plaines River and Tributaries, Illinois and 
                               Wisconsin

      House Sec. 408. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

      Sec. 420. Cameron Parish West of Calcasieu River, Louisiana

      House Sec. 409, Senate Sec. 104(t).--House recedes.

                      Sec. 421. Coastal Louisiana

      Senate Sec. 104(u). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

              Sec. 422. Grand Isle and Vicinity, Louisiana

      House Sec. 410. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

Sec. 423. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Ecosystem, Chef Menteur to Sabine 
                            River, Louisiana

      Senate Sec. 104(x). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

       Sec. 424. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts

      Senate Sec. 104(aa). No comparable House section Section 
recedes with an amendment.

                   Sec. 425. Westport, Massachusetts

      House Sec. 412. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

         Sec. 426. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan

      House Sec. 429. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  Sec. 427. St. Clair Shores, Michigan

      Senate Sec. 104(cc). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

    Sec. 428. Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio

      Senate Sec. 104(dd). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                Sec. 429. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi

      Senate Sec. 104(ee). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                Sec. 430. Tunica Lake, Weir, Mississippi

      House Sec. 330, Senate Sec. 104(ff).--House recedes.

                  Sec. 431. Yellowstone River, Montana

      Senate Sec. 104(hh). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   Sec. 432. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada

      Senate Sec. 104(ii). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

          Sec. 433. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico

      House Sec. 413. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    Sec. 434. Cayuga Creek, New York

      House Sec. 414. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             Sec. 435. Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                 Sec. 436. Oswego River Basin, New York

      Senate Sec. 104(jj). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

               Sec. 437. White Oak River, North Carolina

      House Sec. 552. No comparable House or Senate section.--
Senate recedes with an amendment.

            Sec. 438. Arcola Creek Watershed, Madison, Ohio

      House Sec. 415. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              Sec. 439. Cleveland Harbor, Cleveland, Ohio

      Senate Sec. 104(ll). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

           Sec. 440. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio

      House Sec. 553, Senate Sec. 104(nn).--House recedes.

     Sec. 441. Western Lake Erie Basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan

      House Sec. 416, Senate Sec. 225.--Senate recedes.

          Sec. 442. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 417. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                 Sec. 443. South Carolina Coastal Areas

      Senate Sec. 104(rr). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

           Sec. 444. Santee Delta Focus Area, South Carolina

      House Sec. 427, Senate Sec. 104(oo).--House recedes.

                Sec. 445. Waccamaw River, South Carolina

      Senate Sec. 104(pp). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                   Sec. 446. Day County, South Dakota

      House Sec. 419. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       Sec. 447. Niobrara River and Missouri River, South Dakota

      Senate Sec. 104(ss). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                    Sec. 448. Corpus Christi, Texas

      House Sec. 420. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        Sec. 449. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas

      House Sec. 421. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              Sec. 450. Mouth of the Colorado River, Texas

      House Sec. 422. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   Sec. 451. Santa Clara River, Utah

      Senate Sec. 104(tt). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 Sec. 452. Mount St. Helens, Washington

      Senate Sec. 104(uu). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         Sec. 453. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia

      House Sec. 423. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     Sec. 454. West Virginia Ports

      House Sec. 424. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             Sec. 455. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program

      House Sec. 425, Senate Sec. 223.--House recedes with an 
amendment.

               Sec. 456. Great Lakes Navigational System

      Senate Sec. 104(aaa). No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

  Sec. 457. Nutrient Loading Resulting from Dredged Material Disposal

      House Sec. 426. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

Sec. 458. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers Levees and Streambanks 
                               Protection

      House Sec. 401. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.-

          Sec. 459. Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Plan

      House Sec. 402, Senate Sec. 338.--House recedes with an 
amendment.

          Sec. 460. Susquehanna River and Upper Chesapeake Bay

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                         Title V--Miscellaneous

              sec. 501. corps assumption of nrcs projects

501(a) Llagas Creek, California. House Sec. 501(a), Senate 
        Sec. 101(a)(5).--Senate recedes.
501(b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois. House Sec. 501(b), 
        Senate Sec. 102(b)(2).--House recedes.

                 Sec. 502. Environmental Infrastructure

      House Sec. 502 and Sec. 517. No comparable Senate 
section.--Senate recedes with an amendment.

          Sec. 503. Contaminated Sediment Dredging Technology

      House Sec. 503, Senate Sec. 230.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

                          Sec. 504. Dam Safety

      House Sec. 504. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

              Sec. 505. Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans

      House Sec. 505. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       Sec. 506. Projects for the improvement of the Environment

      House Sec. 506, Senate Sec. 224.--House recedes.

              Sec. 507. Maintenance of Navigation Channels

      House Sec. 507, Senate Sec. 104(s) and Sec. 104(v).--
Senate recedes with an amendment.

           Sec. 508. Measurement of Lake Michigan Diversions

      House Sec. 508, Senate Sec. 102(m).--House recedes.

   Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program

      House Sec. 509, Senate Sec. 314.--House recedes with an 
amendment.

            Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York Monitoring

      House Sec. 510, Senate Sec. 229.--House recedes.

                   Sec. 511. Water Control Management

      House Sec. 511. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              Sec. 512. Beneficial Use of Dredged Material

      House Sec. 512. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

              Sec. 513. Design and Construction Assistance

      House Sec. 513. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  Sec. 514. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers Enhancement Project

      House Sec. 514, Senate Sec. 210.--House recedes.

  Sec. 515. Irrigation Diversion Protection and Fisheries enhancement 
                               Assistance

      House Sec. 515, Senate Sec. 226.--House recedes with an 
amendment.

      Sec. 516. Innovative Technologies for Watershed Restoration

      House Sec. 516. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

         Sec. 517. Expedited Consideration of Certain Projects.

      House Sec. 318, Sec. 518 and Sec. 574, Senate Sec. 307 
and Sec. 313.--Senate recedes with an amendment.

                      Sec. 518. Dog River, Alabama

      House Sec. 519. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

              Sec. 519. Levees in Elba and Geneva, Alabama

      House Sec. 520 and 521, Senate Sec. 333.--House recedes.

      Sec. 520. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah

      House Sec. 522. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    Sec. 521. Beaver Lake, Arkansas

      House Sec. 524, Senate Sec. 102(c).--House recedes.

       Sec. 522. Beaver Lake Trout Production Facility, Arkansas

      House Sec. 525. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

               Sec. 523. Chino Dairy Preserve, California

      House Sec. 526. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

          Sec. 524. Orange and San Diego Counties, California

      House Sec. 528. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 525. Rush Creek, Novato, California

      House Sec. 527. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 526. Santa Cruz Harbor, California

      House Sec. 530. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

             Sec. 527. Lower St. Johns River Basin, Florida

      House Sec. 532. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     Sec. 528. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia

      House Sec. 534. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    Sec. 529. Comprehensive Flood Impact Response Modeling System, 
          Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River Watershed, Iowa

      House Sec. 535, Senate Sec. 318.--House recedes with an 
amendment.

        Sec. 530. Additional Construction Assistance in Illinois

      House Sec. 536. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    Sec. 531. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas

      House Sec. 537, Senate Sec. 324.--House recedes with an 
amendment.

                Sec. 532. Southern and Eastern Kentucky

      House Sec. 538. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                     Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana

      House Sec. 539. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.
      Because the Corps of Engineers has entered into project 
cooperation agreements (PCA's) with respect to the projects 
identified in the Southeast Louisiana Project Technical 
Reports, dated April 1996, May 1996, and May 1996, the 
conferees understand that these projects meet the requirements 
of section 533(d) of WRDA 1996. This determination could only 
be modified by a subsequent determination made by the Chief of 
Engineers at his sole discretion.

                    Sec. 534. Snug Harbor, Maryland

      House Sec. 540. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 Sec. 535. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
                                Maryland

      House Sec. 541. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

 Sec. 536. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts

      House Sec. 544. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                     Sec. 537. St. Louis, Missouri

      House Sec. 545. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

        Sec. 538. Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey

      House Sec. 546. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

  Sec. 539. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels, New York

      House Sec. 547. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

     Sec. 540. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey

      House Sec. 548. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

       Sec. 541. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York

      House Sec. 549. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                      Sec. 542. Woodlawn, New York

      House Sec. 550. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 Sec. 543. Floodplain Mapping, New York

      House Sec. 551. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

    Sec. 544. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio

      House Sec. 553, Senate Sec. 104(nn).--Senate recedes.

                  Sec. 545. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma

      House Sec. 554, Senate Sec. 312.--Senate recedes.
      The conferees understand the State of Oklahoma may use a 
portion of the savings from the buy-out to reduce the loan 
necessary to build a water distribution system for the 
surrounding area residents. The conferees also understand that 
the Sardis Lake Authority, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, and 
the State of Oklahoma may form an entity to benefit equally 
from the sale of surplus water from the appropriate agreed upon 
lake level of Sardis Lake.

              Sec. 546. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon

      House Sec. 556. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 547. Willamette River Basin, Oregon

      House Sec. 557, Senate Sec. 201(e)(7).--Senate recedes 
with an amendment.

         Sec. 548. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 558. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                  Sec. 549. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 559. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

           Sec. 550. Point Marion Lock and Dam, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 560, Senate Sec. 305(d).--Senate recedes.

              Sec. 551. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 561. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                  Sec. 552. Southeastern Pennsylvania

      House Sec. 562. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

    Sec. 553. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, Watershed 
                    Management and Restoration Study

      House Sec. 563, Senate Sec. 104(qq).--House recedes.

                Sec. 554. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico

      House Sec. 564. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

         Sec. 555. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, Study

      House Sec. 565. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

Sec. 556. North Padre Island Storm Drainage Reduction and Environmental 
                          Restoration Project

      House Sec. 569, Senate Sec. 323.--House recedes with an 
amendment.
      The conferees understand the authorized project is 
described in the Nueces County Commissioners Court report dated 
March 31, 1997.

                    Sec. 557. Northern West Virginia

      House Sec. 570. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                 Sec. 558. Mississippi River Commission

      House Sec. 572, Senate Sec. 231.--Senate recedes.

              Sec. 559. Coastal Aquatic Habitat Management

      House Sec. 573. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

       Sec. 560. Abandoned and Inactive Noncoal Mine Restoration

      House Sec. 575. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

             Sec. 561. Beneficial Use of Waste Tire Rubber

      House Sec. 576. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                       Sec. 562. Site Designation

      House Sec. 577. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                       Sec. 563. Land Conveyances

      House Sec. 578, Senate Sec. 334, Sec. 320, Sec. 102(q), 
Sec. 102(r), Sec. 339, Sec. 340.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

                   Sec. 564. McNary Pool, Washington

      Senate Sec. 339. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

                           Sec. 565. Namings

      House Sec. 579, Senate Sec. 308.--Senate recedes with an 
amendment.

Sec. 566. Folsom Dam and Reservoir Additional Storage and Water Supply 
                                Studies.

      House Sec. 580. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                   Sec. 567. Wallops Island, Virginia

      House Sec. 581. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

               Sec. 568. Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan

      House Sec. 582, Senate Sec. 104(bb).--Senate recedes with 
an amendment.

                    Sec. 569. Northeastern Minnesota

      House Sec. 583. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                            Sec. 570. Alaska

      House Sec. 584. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    Sec. 571. Central West Virginia

      House Sec. 585. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     Sec. 572. Sacramento Metropolitan Area Watershed Restoration, 
                              California.

      House Sec. 586. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                        Sec. 573. Onondaga Lake

      House Sec. 587. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

                Sec. 574. East Lynn Lake, West Virginia

      House Sec. 588. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                    Sec. 575. Eel River, California

      House Sec. 589. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

                 Sec. 576. North Little Rock, Arkansas

      House Sec. 590. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes with an amendment.

    Sec. 577. Upper Mississippi River, Mississippi Place, St. Paul, 
                               Minnesota

      House Sec. 591. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
recedes.

     Sec. 578. Dredging of Salt Ponds in the State of Rhode Island.

      Senate Sec. 301. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

            Sec. 579. Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania

      Senate Sec. 302. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

        Sec. 580. Cumberland, Maryland, Flood Project Mitigation

      Senate Sec. 310. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                 Sec. 581. City of Miami Beach, Florida

      Senate Sec. 311. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

   Sec. 582. Research and Development Program for Columbia and Snake 
                         Rivers Salmon Survival

      Senate Sec. 315. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

              Sec. 583. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California

      Senate Sec. 317. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

           Sec. 584. Holes Creek Flood Control Project, Ohio

      Senate Sec. 328. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

         Sec. 585. San Jacinto Disposal Area, Galveston, Texas

      Senate Sec. 335. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.

                   Sec. 586. Water Monitoring Station

      Senate Sec. 337. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

          Sec. 587. Overflow Management Facility, Rhode Island

      Senate Sec. 329. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes.

                  Sec. 588. Lower Chena River, Alaska

      No comparable House or Senate section.

               Sec. 589. Numana Dam Fish Passage, Nevada

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                     Sec. 590. Embrey Dam, Virginia

      No comparable House or Senate section.

       Sec. 591. Environmental Remediation, Front Royal, Virginia

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                         Sec. 592. Mississippi

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                      Sec. 593. Central New Mexico

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                             Sec. 594. Ohio

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                   Sec. 595. Rural Nevada and Montana

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                       Sec. 596. Phoenix, Arizona

      No comparable House or Senate section.

                  Sec. 597. National Harbor, Maryland

      No comparable House or Senate section.

  Title VI. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
    State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration.

      Senate Sec. 401. No comparable House section.--House 
recedes with an amendment.
Miscellaneous

                       Passaic River, New Jersey

      House Sec. 337. No comparable Senate section.--House 
recedes to Senate.
      The conferees understand that the Transportation Equity 
Act for the 21st Century (P.L. 105-206) included funding for 
the design and construction of a facility for safe pedestrian 
access, specifically an esplanade in the vicinity of Joseph G. 
Minish Waterfront Park, Newark, New Jersey. The conferees 
understand it is the intent of the local proponents that the 
esplanade is to have an overall width of 600 feet. The 
conferees encourage the Corps of Engineers to provide 
appropriate technical assistance in the planning of such 
project to ensure its coordination with existing Corps' 
projects and activities along the Passaic River.

                                   Bud Shuster,
                                   Don Young,
                                   Sherwood Boehlert,
                                   Richard H. Baker,
                                   John T. Doolittle,
                                   Don Sherwood,
                                   James L. Oberstar,
                                   Robert A. Borski,
                                   Ellen Tauscher,
                                   Brian Baird,
                                 Managers on the Part of the House.

                                   John H. Chafee,
                                   John Warner,
                                   Bob Smith,
                                   George V. Voinovich,
                                   Max Baucus,
                                   Daniel Moynihan,
                                Managers on the Part of the Senate.

                                  
