Senate Report 105-52 - MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 1998

[Senate Report 105-52]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Calendar No. 117
105th Congress Report
SENATE

1st Session 105-52
_______________________________________________________________________

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 1998

_______

July 17, 1997.--Ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

Mr. Burns, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the
following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H.R. 2016]

The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the
bill (H.R. 2016) making appropriations for military
construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure
for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 1998, and for other purposes, reports the same to
the Senate with amendments and recommends that the bill as
amended do pass.

Amount of bill passed by House.......................... $9,183,000,000
Amount of Senate bill under the House................... 100,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total of bill as reported to Senate............... 9,182,900,000
Amount of 1998 budget estimate.......................... 8,383,248,000
Amount of 1997 appropriations........................... 9,793,309,000
The bill as reported to the Senate:
Over the budget estimate, 1998...................... 799,652,000
Under appropriations for fiscal year 1997........... 610,409,000

C O N T E N T S

----------
Background:
Page
Purpose of the bill.......................................... 3
Comparative statement........................................ 3
Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act........ 7
Committee recommendation......................................... 7
Items of special interest........................................ 8
Military construction, Army...................................... 16
Military construction, Navy...................................... 18
Military construction, Air Force................................. 19
Military construction, Defense-wide.............................. 20
Military construction, Reserve components........................ 22
NATO Security Investment Program................................. 26
Family housing overview.......................................... 27
Family housing, Army............................................. 28
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps............................ 28
Family housing, Air Force........................................ 28
Family housing, Defense-wide..................................... 28
Family housing improvement fund.................................. 29
Homeowners assistance fund....................................... 29
Base closure overview............................................ 29
Base realignment and closure account, part I..................... 33
Base realignment and closure account, part II.................... 34
Base realignment and closure account, part III................... 34
Base realignment and closure account, part IV.................... 34
General provisions............................................... 35
Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 35
Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 35
Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 36
Project listing by location...................................... 37

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the Bill

The Military Construction appropriation bill provides
necessary funding for the planning, design, construction,
alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide,
both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the
construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and
maintenance of military family housing, including payments
against past housing mortgage indebtedness. Certain types of
community impact assistance may be provided, as well as
assistance to members of the military who face loss on the sale
of private residences due to installation realignments and
closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the
NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill
provides funding to implement base closures and realignments
authorized by law.

Comparative Statement

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$9,182,900,000 for fiscal year 1998 military construction,
family housing, and base closure. The following table displays
the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current
fiscal year, the President's fiscal year 1998 request, and the
House allowance:

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (+) or decrease (-) compared with--
Item 1997 adjusted Budget estimate House allowance Committee -----------------------------------------------------------
recommendation 1997 adjusted Budget estimate House allowance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military construction, Army......................... $565,688,000 $595,277,000 $721,027,000 $652,046,000 +$86,358,000 +$56,769,000 -$68,981,000
Rescissions..................................... -3,028,000 .................. .................. .................. +3,028,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military construction, Army (net)...... 562,660,000 595,277,000 721,027,000 652,046,000 +89,386,000 +56,769,000 -68,981,000
Military construction, Navy......................... 707,094,000 540,106,000 685,306,000 605,756,000 -101,338,000 +65,650,000 -79,550,000
Rescissions..................................... -19,780,000 .................. .................. .................. +19,780,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military construction, Navy (net)...... 687,314,000 540,106,000 685,306,000 605,756,000 -81,558,000 +65,650,000 -79,550,000
Military construction, Air Force.................... 754,064,000 495,782,000 662,305,000 662,305,000 -91,759,000 +166,523,000 ..................
Rescissions..................................... -5,100,000 .................. .................. .................. +5,100,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military construction, Air Force (net). 748,964,000 495,782,000 662,305,000 662,305,000 -86,659,000 +166,523,000 ..................
Military construction, Defense-wide................. 763,922,000 673,633,000 613,333,000 690,889,000 -73,033,000 +17,256,000 +77,556,000
Rescissions..................................... -51,000,000 .................. .................. .................. +51,000,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military construction, Defense-wide
(net)........................................ 712,922,000 673,633,000 613,333,000 690,889,000 -22,033,000 +17,256,000 +77,556,000
===========================================================================================================================================
Total, Active components...................... 2,711,860,000 2,304,798,000 2,681,971,000 2,610,996,000 -100,864,000 +306,198,000 -70,975,000
===========================================================================================================================================
Department of Defense Military Unaccompanied Housing
Improvement Fund................................... 5,000,000 .................. .................. .................. -5,000,000 .................. ..................
===========================================================================================================================================
Military construction, Army National Guard.......... 78,086,000 45,098,000 45,098,000 234,614,000 +156,528,000 +189,516,000 +189,516,000
Military construction, Air National Guard........... 189,855,000 60,225,000 137,275,000 185,115,000 -4,740,000 +124,890,000 +47,840,000
Rescission...................................... -5,000,000 .................. .................. .................. +5,000,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military construction, Air National
Guard (net).................................. 184,855,000 60,225,000 137,275,000 185,115,000 +260,000 +124,890,000 +47,840,000
Military construction, Army Reserve................. 55,543,000 39,112,000 77,731,000 96,079,000 +40,536,000 +56,967,000 +18,348,000
Military construction, Naval Reserve................ 37,579,000 13,921,000 40,561,000 21,111,000 -16,468,000 +7,190,000 -19,450,000
Military construction, Air Force Reserve............ 52,805,000 14,530,000 27,143,000 31,830,000 -20,975,000 +17,300,000 +4,687,000
===========================================================================================================================================
Total, Reserve components..................... 408,868,000 172,886,000 327,808,000 568,749,000 +159,881,000 +395,863,000 +240,941,000
===========================================================================================================================================
Total, Military construction.................. 3,125,728,000 2,477,684,000 3,009,779,000 3,179,745,000 +54,017,000 +702,061,000 +169,966,000
Appropriations............................ (3,209,636,000) (2,477,684,000) (3,009,779,000) (3,179,745,000) (-29,891,000) (+702,061,000) (+169,966,000)
Rescissions............................... (-83,908,000) .................. .................. .................. (+83,908,000) .................. ..................
===========================================================================================================================================
NATO Security Investment Program.................... 172,000,000 176,300,000 166,300,000 152,600,000 -19,400,000 -23,700,000 -13,700,000
===========================================================================================================================================
Family housing, Army:
Construction.................................... 158,503,000 143,000,000 202,131,000 167,100,000 +8,597,000 +24,100,000 -35,031,000
Operation and Maintenance....................... 1,212,466,000 1,148,937,000 1,148,937,000 1,149,937,000 -62,529,000 +1,000,000 +1,000,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Army................... 1,370,969,000 1,291,937,000 1,351,068,000 1,317,037,000 -53,932,000 +25,100,000 -34,031,000
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
Construction.................................... 499,886,000 278,933,000 409,178,000 362,619,000 -137,267,000 +83,686,000 -46,559,000
Operation and Maintenance....................... 1,020,721,000 976,504,000 976,504,000 976,504,000 -44,217,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Navy................... 1,520,607,000 1,255,437,000 1,385,682,000 1,339,123,000 -181,484,000 +83,686,000 -46,559,000
Family housing, Air Force:
Construction.................................... 317,507,000 253,128,000 341,409,000 296,633,000 -20,874,000 +43,505,000 -44,776,000
Operation and Maintenance....................... 816,509,000 830,234,000 830,234,000 830,234,000 +13,725,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Air Force.............. 1,134,016,000 1,083,362,000 1,171,643,000 1,126,867,000 -7,149,000 +43,505,000 -44,776,000
Family housing, Defense-wide:
Construction.................................... 4,371,000 4,950,000 4,950,000 4,950,000 +579,000 .................. ..................
Operation and Maintenance....................... 30,963,000 32,724,000 32,724,000 32,724,000 +1,761,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Defense-wide........... 35,334,000 37,674,000 37,674,000 37,674,000 +2,340,000 .................. ..................
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement
Fund............................................... 25,000,000 .................. .................. .................. -25,000,000 .................. ..................
Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense................. 36,181,000 .................. .................. .................. -36,181,000 .................. ..................
===========================================================================================================================================
Total, Family housing......................... 4,122,107,000 3,668,410,000 3,946,067,000 3,820,701,000 -301,406,000 +152,291,000 -125,366,000
Construction.............................. (980,267,000) (680,011,000) (957,668,000) (831,302,000) (-148,965,000) (+151,291,000) (-126,366,000)
Operation and Maintenance................. (3,080,659,000) (2,988,399,000) (2,988,399,000) (2,989,399,000) (-91,260,000) (+1,000,000) (+1,000,000)
Family Housing Improvement Fund........... (25,000,000) .................. .................. .................. (-25,000,000) .................. ..................
Homeowners Assistance Fund................ (36,181,000) .................. .................. .................. (-36,181,000) .................. ..................
===========================================================================================================================================
Base realignment and closure accounts:
Part II......................................... 352,800,000 116,754,000 116,754,000 116,754,000 -236,046,000 .................. ..................
Rescissions................................. -35,391,000 .................. .................. .................. +35,391,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.................................. 317,409,000 116,754,000 116,754,000 116,754,000 -200,655,000 .................. ..................
Part III........................................ 971,925,000 768,702,000 768,702,000 768,702,000 -203,223,000 .................. ..................
Rescissions................................. -75,638,000 .................. .................. .................. +75,638,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.................................. 896,287,000 768,702,000 768,702,000 768,702,000 -127,585,000 .................. ..................
Part IV......................................... 1,182,749,000 1,175,398,000 1,175,398,000 1,175,398,000 -7,351,000 .................. ..................
Rescissions................................. -22,971,000 .................. .................. .................. +22,971,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.................................. 1,159,778,000 1,175,398,000 1,175,398,000 1,175,398,000 +15,620,000 .................. ..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Base realignment and closure
accounts (net)........................... 2,373,474,000 2,060,854,000 2,060,854,000 2,060,854,000 -312,620,000 .................. ..................
===========================================================================================================================================
Revised Economic Assumption (sec. 125).............. .................. .................. .................. -31,000,000 -31,000,000 -31,000,000 -31,000,000
===========================================================================================================================================
Grand total:
New budget (obligational) authority....... 9,793,309,000 8,383,248,000 9,183,000,000 9,182,900,000 -610,409,000 +799,652,000 -100,000
Appropriations........................ (10,011,217,000) (8,383,248,000) (9,183,000,000) (9,182,900,000) (-828,317,000) (+799,652,000) (-100,000)
Rescissions........................... (-217,908,000) .................. .................. .................. (+217,908,000) .................. ..................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compliance With Section 308 of the Budget Control Act

Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that the Committee include in
its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels
contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data
are reflected below:

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations
to its subcommittees of amounts in the First Concurrent
Resolution for 1998: Subcommittee on Military Construction:
Defense discretionary................................... 9,183 9,183 9,920 \1\ 9,902
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
1998.................................................... ........... ........... ........... \2\ 3,064
1999.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 2,841
2000.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 1,731
2001.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 916
2002 and future year.................................... ........... ........... ........... 504
Financial assistance to State and local governments for 1998
in bill.................................................... NA ........... NA ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

Committee Recommendation

The Committee recommends new fiscal year 1998
appropriations of $9,182,900,000. This is $799,652,000 over the
budget request, $100,000 under the House appropriations, and
$610,409,000 under the appropriations for fiscal year 1997. The
basis for this recommendation is contained in the following
``Items of special interest,'' and under the discussions
pertaining to each individual appropriation. Complete project
detail is provided in the tables at the end of the report.

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

compliance with 602(b) allocation

The Appropriations Committee conformed fully to the budget
resolution for defense spending in its 602(b) allocation. This
allocation divided the budget authority and outlays among the
subcommittees with jurisdiction over discretionary spending. In
this recommended bill, the Appropriations Committee has
remained within the constraints of its 602(b) allocation for
military construction.

conformance with authorization bill

The Committee supports the authorization appropriation
process. Therefore, the Committee has provided construction
funds only for specific projects included in either the Senate-
or House-passed versions of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1998 or for projects specifically
authorized in prior years. No unauthorized projects have been
approved.

hearings

The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on
the fiscal year 1998 budget request in March and May 1997. The
subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the
military services and defense agencies.

summary of committee recommendation

The budget request for fiscal year 1998 reflects a
reduction of $1,410,061,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal
year 1997. This proposed level of funding does not provide
sufficient resources to continue the Department's efforts to
modernize, renovate, and improve aging defense facilities. With
approximately 22 percent of the Department's military
construction budget request dedicated to the base realignment
and closure accounts, readiness, and quality of life for the
Active and Reserve components remain in need of substantial
improvement and dedication of adequate resources. The requested
funding level reflects a lack of commitment by the
administration to reduce the serious backlog of readiness,
revitalization and quality of life projects.
The Committee recommends an additional $799,652,000 above
the administrations's fiscal year 1998 budget request to
correct some of these deficiencies. The total recommended
appropriation for fiscal year 1998 is $9,182,900,000, a
reduction of $610,409,000 from fiscal year 1997 funding.

government performance and results act

The Committee considers the full and effective
implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act
[GPRA], Public Law 103-62, to be a priority for all agencies of
Government.
Starting with fiscal year 1999, the Results Act requires
each agency to prepare an annual performance plan covering each
program activity set forth in the budget of such agency.
Specifically, for each program activity the agency is required
to establish performance goals to define performance to be
achieved by a program activity and performance indicators to be
used in assessing the relevant outputs, service levels, and
outcomes of each program activity.
The Department of Defense is pursuing accomplishment of the
GPRA through the ``Quadrennial Defense Review'' [QDR], which
was completed on May 15, 1997. The Secretary of Defense
transmitted that report to Congress and it has served as a
central vehicle for hearings and deliberations over future
Department of Defense and military priorities, organizational
structure, and resource allocation. The Secretary recently
indicated that the QDR meets the strategic plan requirements of
the act. In his letter to the chairman of the Senate
Appropriations Committee he stated that: ``the QDR involved a
comprehensive reexamination of defense strategy, the force
structure of the Active, Guard, and Reserve components and
policies to determine and express the defense strategy of the
United States and to establish a revised defense program
through the year 2003.''
The Department of Defense has begun to incorporate the GPRA
into the Department's planning, programming, and budgeting
system [PPBS]. It will conduct GPRA evaluations annually in the
PPBS, which will take place in September and early October of
this year.
The Committee expects the Department to monitor closely
other agency plans and initiatives that could achieve
significant improvements in military construction activities.
In such areas as family housing operations, the base
realignment and closure accounts, and overseas construction
priorities, the Department can use the guidelines applied under
the Results Act to achieve qualitative improvements.

revised economic assumptions

The following table reflects the reestimation of inflation
undertaken by the Office of Management and Budget in June. The
Committee recommends reductions to the specific appropriations
identified in the table in those amounts, for a total of
$31,000,000. Because of existing shortfalls in the family
housing accounts, the Committee directs that these savings be
applied to these deficits. The Committee has included a
provision which directs the Department to distribute these
reductions against each project, program and activity on a pro
rata basis.

Account Amount

Military construction:
Army................................................ -$2,000,000
Navy................................................ -3,000,000
Air Force........................................... -4,000,000
Defense-wide........................................ -5,000,000
NATO infrastructure..................................... -1,000,000
Base realignment and closure............................ -16,000,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. -31,000,000

use of prior-year savings

The budget request proposed the use of prior-year savings
to finance fiscal year 1998 projects and programs as follows:

Account Amount

Military construction:
Air Force........................................... $23,858,000
Army Reserve........................................ 7,900,000
Family housing, Navy................................ 8,463,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. 40,221,000

The Committee does not approve of this method of financing
and reminds the Department that they should request rescissions
of these funds by account and by fiscal year. The Committee
rejects the proposed use of these funds for fiscal year 1998
activities and projects and has determined that these funds are
necessary to complete ongoing projects within the Military
Construction appropriations. Their proposed use for fiscal year
1998 projects and programs could jeopardize the successful
completion of projects appropriated in prior years.

defense finance and accounting service

The Defense Finance and Accounting Service [DFAS] is
consolidating more than 300 accounting offices into five large
existing finance centers and 15 operating locations. This
effort is aimed at reducing the number of accounting and
finance personnel and streamlining the Department of Defense's
financial operations. However, the Committee is concerned that
the number of operating locations is excessive to the
Department's overall finance and accounting requirements. Many
of these proposed centers require extensive alterations and
construction, diverting scarce military construction funding
from higher priority requirements. The Committee directs the
Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller, to review the total
DFAS infrastructure requirement, including justification for
each operating location, and report to the congressional
defense committees on the results by October 15, 1997. This
review should encompass how finance and accounting operations
within the Department of Defense could be more effectively
streamlined with fewer operating locations.

historic preservation

The Committee continues to be concerned that maintaining
historic quarters is overburdening the military housing
accounts. Last year, the Committee directed each military
service to review current inventories of historic quarters and
to report on specific plans to remove all but the most
significant historic homes.
The services researched the legal mandates and determined
that they were unable to remove facilities from the National
Register as recommended by the Marsh Panel. They found that
legal mandates prevented the removal from the National Register
and that the eligibility criterion needs to be revised before
action can be taken. This revision includes a formula for
determining levels of historic significance, the development of
stratified maintenance standards, and an amendment to 36 CFR
part 60.15 to incorporate levels of significance in the
criteria for removing a resource from the National Register.
The Committee directs that the Department of Defense work with
the appropriate Federal agencies to initiate these changes in
the National Register eligibility criteria.

single member housing

The Committee continues to recognize the requirement for
better barracks and dormitories for our service members. The
Committee supports the Department's initiative to renovate
barracks from the ``Real property maintenance'' account of the
Defense Appropriation Act. This effort is critical at a time
when resources are limited. The Committee, however, is
concerned that requiring all new construction to meet the one
plus one standard is unrealistic and should not be mandated
across the Department of Defense.
The fiscal year 1998 budget request reflects that the Army,
Navy, nor the Marine Corps cannot meet the one plus one
standard in the near future. The Committee recommends that the
Department review the overall allocation of barracks/
dormitories funding among the services to ensure some degree of
parity is reached in the next 10 years.
The Committee recommends $659,891,000 for barracks
construction in fiscal year 1998, an increase of $17,190,000
over the budget request. The projects are as follows:

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army:
Fort Huachuca, AZ................... $20,000,000 $20,000,000
Fort Gordon, GA..................... 22,000,000 22,000,000
Schofield Barracks, HI.............. 44,000,000 44,000,000
Fort Riley, KS...................... 18,500,000 18,500,000
Fort Campbell, KY................... 37,000,000 37,000,000
Fort Knox, KY....................... 22,000,000 22,000,000
Fort Sill, OK....................... .............. 8,000,000
Fort Sam Houston, TX................ 16,000,000 16,000,000
Fort Myer, VA....................... 8,200,000 8,200,000
Fort Lewis, WA...................... 31,000,000 31,000,000
Ansbach, Germany.................... 22,000,000 22,000,000
Heidelberg, Germany................. 8,800,000 8,800,000
Kaiserslautern, Germany............. 6,000,000 6,000,000
Mannheim, Germany................... 6,200,000 ..............
Camp Casey, Korea................... 5,100,000 5,100,000
Camp Castle, Korea.................. 8,400,000 8,400,000
Camp Humphreys, Korea............... 32,000,000 32,000,000
Camp Red Cloud, Korea............... 23,600,000 23,600,000
Camp Stanley, Korea................. 7,000,000 ..............
Navy/Naval Reserve:
Camp Pendleton MCB, CA.............. 12,000,000 12,000,000
Kaneohe Bay MCAS, HI................ 19,000,000 19,000,000
Washington NAF, DC.................. 4,640,000 4,640,000
Great Lakes NH, IL.................. 5,200,000 5,200,000
Great Lakes NTC, IL................. 26,690,000 26,690,000
Gulfport, MS........................ .............. 22,440,000
Meridian NAS, MS.................... .............. 7,050,000
New River MCAS, NC.................. 10,600,000 10,600,000
Dam Neck FCTC, VA................... 7,000,000 7,000,000
Oceana NAS, VA...................... 20,900,000 20,900,000
Bahrain Island...................... 25,000,000 25,000,000
Sigonella NAS, Italy................ 21,440,000 21,440,000
Roosevelt Roads NS, Puerto Rico..... 24,100,000 24,100,000
Air Force:
Clear AFS, AK....................... 20,285,000 20,285,000
Peterson AFB, CO.................... 4,081,000 4,081,000
Eglin AFB, FL:
Auxiliary field 9............... 6,470,000 6,470,000
Auxiliary field 3............... .............. 7,300,000
Mountain Home AFB, ID............... 8,959,000 8,959,000
Keesler AFB, MS..................... 30,855,000 30,855,000
Offutt AFB, NE...................... .............. 6,900,000
Pope AFB, NC........................ 8,356,000 8,356,000
Spangdahelm AB, Germany............. 18,500,000 ..............
Kunsan AB, Korea.................... 8,325,000 8,325,000
Osan AB, Korea...................... 11,100,000 ..............
RAF Lakenheath, UK.................. 11,400,000 11,400,000
Defense-wide: Fort Bragg, NC............ .............. 8,300,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 642,701,000 659,891,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS CONSTRUCTION

The U.S. military presence overseas has significantly
diminished over the past several years, as our country has
transitioned from a forward-based strategy to one of forward
presence. The complexion of our overseas commitments continues
to change, causing uncertainty about the size, location, and
composition of our forces into the next century. The
``Quadrennial Defense Review'' [QDR] recently noted that
proposed force reductions may lead to reductions in overseas
presence and forward deployments in order to avoid additional
increases in operating optempo.
The Committee believes that there is a strong likelihood
for additional force structure reductions in the next few
years. The fiscal year 1998 budget request proposes over
$600,000,000 for overseas military construction, almost 24
percent of the construction budget for the Department of
Defense.
While these proposed projects support U.S. missions and
forces around the world, the Committee cautions that we must be
prepared for reductions from overseas deployments if force
levels decline further. While recognizing the importance of
providing improvements to those essential quality of life
facilities overseas, the Committee believes the Department
should be particularly conservative in committing to additional
construction requirements. The Department should consider every
opportunity to lease facilities or share infrastructure with
host nations, where possible. Accordingly, the Committee has
recommended funding only those most essential service
priorities overseas.

environmental compliance projects

The Department has requested $103,581,000 for environmental
compliance project construction during fiscal year 1998. This
Committee recommends funding for 24 class I violation projects,
as follows:

Installation/project title Recommended

Fort Lewis, WA, tank trail erosion mitigation........... $2,000,000
Fort A.P. Hill, VA, central vehicle wash facility....... 5,400,000
Camp Pendleton, CA, emergency spill control............. 2,840,000
Pearl Harbor Naval Station, HI, oily waste collection
treatment facility.................................. 25,000,000
Norfolk Naval Shipyard, VA, oily waste collection system 9,500,000
Indian Mountain, AK, upgrade POL system................. 1,991,000
Edwards Air Force Base, CA:
Add/alter sewer line................................ 1,394,000
Upgrade wastewater treatment plant.................. 1,493,000
MacDill Air Force Base, FL, remediate small arms range.. 1,543,000
Arnold Air Force Base, TN, wastewater treatment
facilities.......................................... 10,750,000
Aviano Air Base, Italy, wastewater disposal system areas 7,900,000
Kunsan Air Base, Korea, fire training facility.......... 2,000,000
Lajes Field, Portugal, water treatment plant............ 4,800,000
Westover Air Reserve Base, MA, fire training facility... 1,800,000
Minneapolis/St. Paul IAP, MN:
Add/alter aircraft corrosion control facility....... 1,550,000
Vehicle wash facility............................... 360,000
Gulfport IAP, MS, regional fire training facility....... 900,000
Schenectady ANG, NY, fuel cell/corrosion control hangar. 5,700,000
Charlotte/Douglas IAP, NC, alter fuel cell/corrosion
control facil- ity.................................. 2,550,000
Klamath Falls, IAP, OR, vehicle refueling shop and paint
bay................................................. 520,000
Quonset State Airport, RI, add to corrosion control
facility............................................ 355,000
McEntire ANGB, SC, add/alter fuel and corrosion control
facility............................................ 1,500,000
Salt Lake City IAP, UT, add/alter vehicle wash and
corrosion control facility.......................... 460,000
Various locations, Defense Logistics Agency conforming
storage (for hazardous materials)................... 11,275,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. 103,581,000

The Committee again directs the Department to devote the
maximum amount of resources to actual cleanups and to limit
resources expended on administration, support, studies, and
investigations, to the greatest extent possible.

UNIFIED DESIGN GUIDANCE

While the Committee agrees with the House that more
progress could be made in eliminating redundant design criteria
systems, it seems premature to mandate creation of a new or
expanded organization within the Office of the Secretary of
Defense to consolidate design criteria. The Committee is aware
that the services have already jointly developed uniform
criteria in areas such as specifications (in conjunction with
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration), computer
aided design and drafting, geographical information systems,
design and technical manuals (except those for service unique
requirements), and construction cost estimating.
In the interest of achieving further uniformity and
efficiency, the Committee directs the Department and the
services to submit a joint report to the congressional defense
committees by March 31, 1998, which addresses: (1) areas where
uniform procedures, systems, and/or criteria are already in
use; (2) other possible areas where it may be practical to
create more uniformity; and (3) the most cost effective system
for implementing improvements either through a greater use of
tri-service groups; centralized development and management
under one of the services with design and construction
authorities; or centralizing the development and management of
design guidance under the Secretary of Defense.

military construction standards

The Committee recognizes the value of predisaster
construction techniques and the positive results they have in
saving lives and protecting facilities and property in the
event of a natural disaster. The Committee acknowledges that
other Government agencies, such as FEMA and HUD, are working
toward increasing research to best minimize property damage
during disasters. The Committee, therefore, encourages the
Department of Defense to consider using construction techniques
that minimize destruction during disasters and follow local
building codes that address such requirements.

REPROGRAMMING CRITERIA

The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements more than $2,000,000.
To provide the individual services the flexibility to proceed
with construction contracts without disruption or delay, the
costs associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in
prior years for which construction contracts have not been
completed.

base realignment and closure

The Committee has included $2,060,854,000 for the ``Base
realignment and closure'' account. The Committee has fully
funded the budget request for base closure and realignment.
This includes full funding of the requirements for
environmental cleanup at closing and realigning bases.
The Committee again asks the General Accounting Office to
continue its annual review of the base closure accounts. The
Committee requests GAO's review of and recommendations on the
validity of DOD's proposed budget requests for base closure
activities. In particular, the Committee seeks GAO's assistance
in validating the requests for individual construction
projects, the operation and maintenance costs, and the
environmental cleanup costs associated with base closures and
realignments. The Committee believes the annual GAO review will
continue to give the Congress a better foundation for approving
future requests. This report should be provided to the
congressional defense committees not later than May 15, 1998.
In past years, the Committee directed that any transfer of
funds for construction projects, which deviated from the
approved projects for BRAC IV, should be treated like any other
reprogramming within the military construction appropriation.
The Committee also directs that any transfer of funds for
construction projects, which deviate from the projects
currently approved for BRAC II and BRAC III should be treated
like any other reprogramming within the military construction
appropriation.

Military Construction, Army

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $565,688,000
Rescission.......................................... -3,028,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 562,660,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 595,277,000
House allowance......................................... 721,027,000
Committee recommendation................................ 652,046,000

The Committee is recommending $652,046,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 1998. This is an increase of $56,769,000 from the
budget request for fiscal year 1998 and $68,981,000 below the
House allowance. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
U.S. Southern Command senior officer housing, Miami, FL.--
The Army plans to move the U.S. Southern Command from Panama to
the Miami, FL, area. The Army's budget request recommended
$2,300,000 to purchase eight units of family housing for senior
officers assigned to headquarters, U.S. Southern Command. The
average price of each housing unit is approximately $287,500.
Five of the eight units are designated for general/flag
officers. The Committee believes that all actions relating to
the relocation of Southern Command should be accomplished by
lease, rather than by military construction. Further, the
Committee continues strongly to support the need to provide
adequate housing for enlisted members of the Armed Forces. This
concern takes precedent over housing for more senior personnel.
The Army recently informed the Committee that they support the
House position, that this requirement should be satisfied
through leasing. Accordingly, the Committee has provided
additional leasing funds with the ``Army family housing''
account to continue the current leasing arrangement.
Road improvement, Pohakuloa training range, Hawaii.--Of the
$57,646,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design
of the Saddle Road improvement, Pohakuloa training range,
Hawaii. The Committee fully expects this contract to be awarded
as early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Centralized vehicle wash facility, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of
the $57,646,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $300,000 be made available for the design of
a centralized vehicle wash facility, Fort Wainwright. The
Committee fully expects this contract to be awarded as early in
fiscal year 1998 as practical.
National Ground Intelligence Center, Charlottesville, VA.--
The budget request included $3,100,000 for planning and design
of the National Ground Intelligence Center in Charlottesville,
VA. This project should have been shown as a component within
the total amount requested for planning and design. The
Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to use $3,100,000
for the planning and design of this project from the additional
amount provided to the Army for this purpose.
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ.--The Army's embedded software
mission for weapons and munitions systems at Picatinny Arsenal
is in serious need of consolidation. In 1993, the Army approved
the initial design for a new Armament Software Engineering
Center, estimated to save the Army $5,000,000 per year in
operation and maintenance costs. Realizing the workload for
this mission will increase significantly in the near future,
the surface area needed for that increase is inadequate to meet
the needs of the anticipated 150-percent increase in personnel
by the year 2000. The Committee encourages the Army to
incorporate the Armament Software Engineering Center in its
fiscal year 1999 budget request.
Of the $57,646,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,300,000 be made available for the
design of this center at Picatinny Arsenal, NJ. The Committee
fully expects this contract to be awarded as early in fiscal
year 1998 as practical.
Gymnasium, West Point, NY.--Of the $57,646,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Military construction, Army''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,000,000 be
made available for the design of a gymnasium at West Point, NY.
The Committee fully expects this contract to be awarded as
early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
MWR facility, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of the $11,900,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the Army
account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,400,000 be
made available to provide refrigeration equipment and
improvements at the Fort Wainwright skating facility. The
Committee fully expects these contracts to be awarded as early
in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Emergency services center, Fort Meade, MD.--Of the
$57,646,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $450,000 be made available for the design of
an emergency services center for the provost marshall, and fire
prevention and protection, including ambulance service at Fort
Meade, MD. The Committee fully expects this contract to be
awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Camp Bonneville, Vancouver, WA.--The 1995 Base Realignment
and Closure Commission recommended the closure of Camp
Bonneville in Vancouver, WA. This closure was done in an effort
to save base operations and maintenance funds and provide reuse
opportunities. The closure of Camp Bonneville will provide the
local community with an opportunity to expand recreation and
foster economic growth in the region.
However, significant questions regarding the status of this
facility must be addressed before eventual disposition of the
property. The Committee directs the Army to provide a report to
the congressional defense committees on the following issues:
(1) the threat to public safety by unexploded ordnance on site,
and (2) the need for the Army to fence the site in the interest
of protecting public safety. This report is to be provided not
later than November 1, 1997.
MOUT facility, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of the $57,646,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $1,200,000 be made available for the design of a MOUT
collective training facility at Fort Wainwright. The Committee
fully expects this contract to be awarded as early in fiscal
year 1998 as practical.

Military Construction, Navy

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $707,094,000
Rescission.......................................... -19,780,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 687,314,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 540,106,000
House allowance......................................... 685,306,000
Committee recommendation................................ 605,756,000

The Committee is recommending $605,756,000 for Navy and
Marine Corps military construction for fiscal year 1998. This
amount is an increase of $65,650,000 from the fiscal year 1998
budget request and $79,550,000 below the House allowance. (See
State tables at the end of the report for complete program
recommendations.)
F/A-18 relocation.--The Committee directs the Navy to
conduct an independent study of the decision to relocate F/A-18
aircraft from Cecil Field Naval Air Station. This study shall
provide a weighted comparison of the pros and cons of all
scenarios in order to determine the optimal solution for
relocation. The study shall cover all issues related to
readiness, environmental, noise, and other applicable matters.
The results of this study should be provided to the Committee
not later than November 15, 1997.
Warfighting center, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.--Of
the $46,489,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Navy'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $437,000 to be made available for the design
of a warfighting center at the Stennis Space Center,
Mississippi. The Committee fully expects this contract to be
awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Puget Sound Naval Ship Yard enlisted dining expansion,
Bremerton, WA.--The Navy has completed design for an addition
to the enlisted dining facility at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.
This addition is urgently needed to accommodate the increased
demand resulting from the construction of two new bachelor
enlisted quarters. In addition to seating shortfalls, food
space is seriously inadequate and there are no restroom
facilities. Of the $13,860,000 provided to the Navy for minor
construction, the Committee recommends that no less than
$1,500,000 be provided to complete this project. The Committee
expects this contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year
1998 as practical.
Bangor Special Education Center.--The Committee is
concerned about an impending situation affecting children of
military personnel stationed at Bangor Submarine Base. The
school district which serves these dependents, the Central
Kitsap School District, and the State of Washington, have
consistently supported the needs of children and military
families. However, because of the large influx of military
family members due to base realignment actions and a shift in
military housing locations, the school district is unable to
provide appropriate educational facilities.
The problem is particularly acute for special education
dependents. Bangor has been designated as a preferred
assignment for military personnel with special needs children,
including children with severe handicap conditions. The school
district must currently transport these children to facilities
some distance from the base because no facilities exist on base
to meet the educational demands caused by these additional
students.
Accordingly, the Committee directs the Department of
Defense to review the plan for a special need and education
center that has been developed by the school district. The
Committee further directs the Department to provide a report on
the viability of this plan to the congressional defense
committees not later than 60 days after enactment of the bill.

Military Construction, Air Force

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $754,064,000
Rescission.......................................... -5,100,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 748,964,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 495,782,000
House allowance......................................... 662,305,000
Committee recommendation................................ 662,305,000

The Committee recommends $662,305,000 for the Air Force in
fiscal year 1998. This is an increase of $166,523,000 to the
fiscal year 1998 budget request and equal to the House
allowance. (See State table at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
Aviano AB, Italy.--The Committee recognizes the importance
of maintaining a U.S. fighter presence in the southern region
of NATO and that Aviano Air Base meets that requirement.
Approximately $412,000,000 is required for capital facility
investment to convert the base from a forward operating
location to a main operating base with a permanent flying
mission assigned. The Committee is concerned that the Air Force
does not have a formal lease agreement with the Italian
Government for Aviano Air Base, but rather a series of leasing
arrangements throughout the Aviano area. With significant
infrastructure investments being made and planned for the base,
it is prudent for the Department of Defense to seek some
guarantee of a long-term presence at the base. The Committee
believes that transitioning from the current informal
arrangement to a more formal, legal agreement is necessary. The
Committee directs the Department of the Air Force to report to
the congressional defense committees on the status of
negotiations with the Government of Italy and lease
arrangements no later than January 15, 1998.
Dangerous cargo pads, Pope AFB, NC.--Of the $48,880,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $2,400,000 to be made available for the design of
a remote apron area for the loading and unloading of
explosives/dangerous cargo at Pope Air Force Base. The
Committee fully expects this contract to be awarded as early in
fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Taxiway extension, Pope AFB, NC.--Of the $48,880,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $260,000 be made available for the design of a
taxiway extension at Pope Air Force Base. The Committee fully
expects this contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year
1998 as practical.
Library and adult education center, Seymour Johnson AFB,
NC.--Of the $48,880,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Military construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $550,000 be made available for the
planning and design of a library and adult education center at
Seymour Johnson AFB, NC. The Committee fully expects this
contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.

Military Construction, Defense-wide

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $763,922,000
Rescission.......................................... -51,000,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 712,922,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 673,633,000
House allowance......................................... 613,333,000
Committee recommendation................................ 690,889,000

The Committee recommends $690,889,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-wide'' account. The amount
recommended is an increase of $17,256,000 from the fiscal year
1998 budget request and $77,556,000 above the House allowance.
(See State tables at the end of the report for complete program
recommendations.)

chemical demilitarization

The budget request identified a requirement of $120,527,000
for chemical weapons demilitarization facility construction in
fiscal year 1998. The Committee recommends a total of
$76,527,000 for this program. This is a decrease of $44,000,000
from the fiscal year 1998 budget request and $19,000,000 from
the House allowance. The Committee finds that phase II of the
ammunition demilitarization facility at Pine Bluff, AR, will
not be ready for award in fiscal year 1998. This slippage is
based on delays in receipt of required environmental permits.
The Committee defers funding for this project at this time.
The Committee notes that adequate funds are available from
prior years to start construction of the Pine Bluff facility
once the required permits are issued. Future Army budgets
should ensure that the rest of the construction and
demilitarization programs can be carried out without break.

Establishment of DOD Schools in Guam

The Committee understands that there are emerging military
construction and operation and maintenance requirements for a
DOD elementary and secondary school in Guam. These proposed
schools will help meet the educational requirements of family
members of eligible military and civilian personnel assigned to
Guam. The Committee encourages the Department to work with the
Congress on clearly establishing those requirements in the
fiscal year 1999 budget process.

Medical Facilities

The budget request included $140,875,000 for 15 projects
and for unspecified minor construction to provide hospital and
medical facilities, including treatment, training, and medical
research and development facilities. The Committee recommends
funding for these projects and five additional projects for a
total of $208,525,000. The following hospital and medical
projects are provided for fiscal year 1998:

Installation/project title Recommended

San Diego NS, CA, add/alter environmental preventive
unit................................................ $2,100,000
Naval submarine base, New London, CT, add/alter Naval
Undersea Medical Institute.......................... 2,300,000
New Castle Airport, DE, replace squadron OPS/aeromedical
evacuation facility................................. 7,000,000
Pensacola NAS, FL, medical clinic addition.............. 2,750,000
Robins AFB, GA, add/alter ambulatory health care center. 19,000,000
Fort Wayne IAP, IN, replace dining hall/medical training
facility............................................ 5,900,000
Fort Campbell, KY, consolidated troop medical/dental
clinic.............................................. 13,600,000
Forest Glen [WRAIR], MD, Army Institute of Research,
phase V............................................. 20,000,000
Fort Detrick, MD, health/dental clinic.................. 4,650,000
McGuire AFB, NJ, ambulatory health care center
replacement......................................... 35,217,000
Holloman AFB, NM, dental clinic replacement............. 3,000,000
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, alter composite medical
facility............................................ 2,750,000
Will Rogers IAP, OK, replace aeromedical evacuation
training facility................................... 3,100,000
McEntire ANGB, SC, dining facility/joint medical
training faci- lity................................. 7,000,000
Lackland AFB, TX, blood donor center.................... 3,000,000
Hill AFB, UT, clinic addition........................... 3,100,000
Portsmouth Naval Hospital, VA, hospital replacement
(phase IX).......................................... 34,600,000
Quantico MCB, VA, medical/dental clinic replacement..... 19,000,000
Everett NS, WA, medical/dental clinic................... 7,500,000
Fort Lewis, WA, troop medical clinic.................... 5,000,000
Various locations, worldwide, unspecified minor
construction........................................ 7,958,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. 208,525,000

Contingency construction.--The Committee has provided
$4,000,000 for the ``Contingency construction'' account. This
account provides funds which may be used by the Secretary of
Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The Committee
believes that the funding provided to the account is adequate
to meet the needs of the Department.
Southwest Asia prepositioning.--The Committee acknowledges
the requirement for prepositioning equipment in Southwest Asia.
These supplies and equipment will provide logistical support in
the region, in the event of hostilities that involve the United
States. The Committee notes that the Army has stated that Qatar
has offered to make a financial contribution toward the
American defense effort in that country. The Committee strongly
encourages the Secretary of Defense to execute a burdensharing
agreement, whereby there is an equal sharing of financial
resources involved in this project. The Committee directs that
$10,000,000 of the amount provided for this program in fiscal
year 1998, may not be obligated in any way, or expended,
pending the delivery of a report from the Secretary as to his
success in completing such a burdensharing agreement with the
Government of Qatar. The report is requested not later than
March 1, 1998.

Military Construction, Reserve Components

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $413,868,000
Rescission.......................................... -5,000,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 408,868,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 172,886,000
House allowance......................................... 327,808,000
Committee recommendation................................ 568,749,000

The Committee recommends $568,749,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components.
This amount is $395,863,000 above the fiscal year 1998 budget
request and $240,941,000 above the House allowance. This
increase reflects the Committee's continued strong support for
the Guard and Reserve.
The Committee's recommended action on each Reserve
component project is reflected in the State list at the end of
this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve component as outlined in the following table:

RESERVE COMPONENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
House Committee
Component Request allowance recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard............................................. $45,098,000 $45,098,000 $234,614,000
Air National Guard.............................................. 60,225,000 137,275,000 185,115,000
Army Reserve.................................................... 39,112,000 77,731,000 96,079,000
Naval Reserve................................................... 13,921,000 40,561,000 21,111,000
Air Force Reserve............................................... 14,530,000 27,143,000 31,830,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 172,886,000 327,808,000 568,749,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last year the Committee directed that the Army program
request at least $75,000,000 in the fiscal year 1998 request
for the Army National Guard. Instead, the budget request
contained only $45,098,000, almost $30,000,000 less than the
amount specified. The Committee understands that the recent
offsite agreement between the Army and the Army National Guard
resulted in an agreed military construction annual budget
request level of $50,000,000 for the Army National Guard.
Accordingly, the Committee directs that no Army funding for
overseas classified locations may be expended until at least
$50,000,000 is requested for the construction of Army National
Guard projects in both the fiscal year 1999 budget request and
the future years defense plan [FYDP].

Army National Guard installation philosophy

The Committee commends the Army National Guard for
establishing a vision as to how their installations should
appear and function as they transition to the next century.
This philosophy is focused on the future and those investments
necessary to provide efficiencies and long-term savings. The
key tenets of this plan are education, data analysis,
computerized maintenance management, energy management, master
planning, and leadership. The Committee encourages the Army
National Guard to create linkages with this philosophy and the
resource prioritization and allocation process.
The Committee commends the Department of Defense for
developing a long-term plan and program for replacement and
rehabilitation of National Guard armories. The Committee
directs that the National Guard Bureau develop and provide a
future years defense plan to the appropriate committees not
later than March 30, 1998.
The Committee has added $14,571,000 for specific Reserve
component planning and design initiatives and minor
construction projects listed below. The Department is expected
to program the construction funds for these projects.
Base infrastructure improvements.--Of the $8,800,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,200,000 be made available for base infrastructure
improvements at the 120th FG ANG, Great Falls IAP, MT. The
Committee fully expects these contracts to be awarded as early
in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Readiness center, Dagsboro, DE.--Of the $33,000,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,300,000 be made available for the design of a readiness
center, Dagsboro, DE. The Committee fully expects this design
contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Tafuna, American Samoa.--Of the $7,100,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Army Reserve'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $2,000,000 be made
available for the design of alterations/additions to the Army
Reserve Center in Tafuna, American Samoa. The Committee fully
expects this design contract to be awarded as early in fiscal
year 1998 as practical.
Regional training center, Camp Dawson, WV.--The Committee
urges the Army National Guard to accelerate the planning and
design at Camp Dawson and for which planning funds were
provided in fiscal year 1997. The Committee expects that this
project will be included in the National Guard 5-year plan and
the President's fiscal year 1999 budget request.
Combat pistol course, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$40,900,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $800,000 be made available for a combat pistol
qualification course. The Committee fully expects this contract
to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Troop medical clinic/military entrance processing station,
Camp Dodge, IA.--Of the $33,000,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $427,000 be made available
for the design of a troop medical clinic/military entrance
processing station at Camp Dodge, IA. The Committee fully
expects this design contract to be awarded as early in fiscal
year 1998 as practical.
Mobilization and training equipment site, Yakima Training
Center, WA.--Of the $33,000,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,184,000 for the design
of a mobilization and training equipment site [MATES], Yakima
Training Center, WA. The Committee fully expects this design
contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Reserve center, Great Falls, MT.--Of the $33,000,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$360,000 be made available for the design of a Reserve center,
Great Falls, MT. The Committee fully expects this design
contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Command support maintenance shop/Armed Forces Reserve
center, Eleanor, WV.--Of the $33,000,000 provided for planning
and design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $2,000,000 be made
available for the design of a command support maintenance shop
and associated Armed Forces Reserve center in Eleanor, WV. The
Committee fully expects this design contract to be awarded as
early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Armed Forces Reserve center, Los Alamitos, CA.--Of the
$33,000,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $710,000 be made available for the design of an Armed
Forces Reserve center, Los Alamitos, CA. The Committee fully
expects this design contract to be awarded as early in fiscal
year 1998 as practical.
Armed forces reserve center, Billings, MT.--Of the
$14,950,000 provided for construction, the Committee directs
that not less than $550,000 be made available to support
construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalk, adjacent street
paving, and water recycle systems associated with this project.
Dual-use training facility, Northfield, VT.--The Committee
is aware that the Army National Guard is working with the
Vermont National Guard and Norwich University to develop a new
type of training facility. They envision constructing a dual-
use facility that would meet the needs of five Army National
Guard detachments and Norwich University ROTC while
simultaneously providing a vital link to various community
organizations such as FEMA, firefighters, and police. This new
facility will be unique in its provision of the four domains of
training (distance learning, virtual training systems,
constructive simulation, and live simulation) to both military
personnel and civilians.
Of the $33,000,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design of
this dual-use training facility. The Committee fully expects
this design contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998
as practical.
Readiness center, Bryan, TX.--The Committee is aware of a
requirement to renovate the readiness center in Bryan, TX. The
existing facility was built over 40 years ago and is inadequate
for the current mission and training requirements of the unit.
The individuals assigned to this facility drill in an
overcrowded and substandard readiness center. The Committee
strongly urges the Army National Guard to include funding in
the fiscal year 1999 budget request to renovate this readiness
center.
Organizational maintenance shop, Fort Huachuca, AZ.--Of the
$33,000,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $350,000 be made available for the design of an
organizational maintenance shop, Fort Huachuca, AZ. The
Committee fully expects this design contract to be awarded as
early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Base supply complex, Will Rogers ANG Base, OK.--The
Committee is aware of the requirement for a base supply complex
at this installation given the condition and inefficiency of
the present facilities. Of the $15,650,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Air National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $350,000 be made
available for the design of a base supply complex, Will Rogers
ANG Base, OK. The Committee fully expects this design contract
to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Medical clinic addition, Eielson AFB, AK.--Of the
$8,800,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,400,000 be made available for a medical clinic
addition at Eielson AFB, AK. The Committee fully expects this
contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Base supply complex, Burlington IAP, VT.--Of the
$15,650,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $550,000 be made available for the design of a base supply
complex, Burlington IAP, VT. The Committee fully expects this
design contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Readiness center, Oklahoma City, OK.--Of the $15,650,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Air National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$497,000 be made available for the design of a readiness
center, Oklahoma City, OK. The Committee fully expects this
design contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Advanced technology training center, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of
the $33,000,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $163,000 be made available for the design of an
advanced technology training center at Fort Harrison, MT. The
Committee fully expects this design contract to be awarded as
early in fiscal year 1998 as practical.
Communications training squadron facility, Coraopolis,
PA.--Of the $2,116,000 provided for planning and design with
the ``Air Force Reserve'' account, the Committee directs not
less than $280,000 be made available for the design of a
communications squadron training facility for the 911th Air
Wing, Coraopolis, PA. The Committee fully expects the design
contract to be awarded as early in fiscal year 1998 as
practical.
Planning and design.--The Committee recommendation provides
an additional $41,921,000 over the budget request for planning
and design activities for the Reserve components. The Army
continues to ignore the future needs of the Reserve components.
In anticipation of increased congressional support in the
appropriations process, the Army has continued to underfund
Reserve component planning and design funding.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $172,000,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 176,300,000
House allowance......................................... 166,300,000
Committee recommendation................................ 152,600,000

The Committee has provided $152,600,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program for
fiscal year 1998. This amount is $23,700,000 below the
President's fiscal year 1998 budget request and $13,700,000
below the House allowance. The Committee understands that
approximately $23,700,000 is expected to be available from
recoupments from prior-year U.S.-funded work, and from
deobligation of NATO funds for previously obligated projects
that were reduced in scope or canceled. The Committee directs
the Department to continue to work with the member nations to
reduce the U.S. share of the overall construction program costs
associated with this program.

NATO EXPANSION

The Committee is concerned that the amount requested
annually by the Department for the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment Program continues to increase.
This continuous investment in NATO infrastructure each year
seems redundant and excessive with the end of the cold war and
the dramatic reshaping of Europe that is taking place.
In light of the recent NATO meeting in Madrid, the
Committee is particularly apprehensive about the increased
costs that would be associated with the incorporation of three
new member States into the alliance. With future defense
spending constrained, this expansion has the potential to
seriously degrade U.S. military construction and defense
programs.
In the report accompanying the fiscal year 1997 Senate
report on the Military Construction appropriations bill, the
Committee directed that the Secretary of Defense provide a
report by May 1, 1997, to the congressional defense committees
on new organization and infrastructure requirements that would
be required as a result of this expansion. The Department's
initial response was preliminary and sketchy. In light of the
decisions taken at the NATO summit in Madrid on July 9, 1997,
to include three new member nations, the Committee now directs
the Secretary to provide a comprehensive report which provides
in detail the additional funding requirements associated with
the expansion, including logistical, communications,
construction, and all other additional requirements anticipated
for the NATO infrastructure account. Such projections should be
accompanied by a detailed summary of the costs expended to date
for this purpose. The Congress must have pertinent cost
information available on this matter when the Senate considers
the administration's proposal on NATO expansion. Therefore, the
Committee directs that this report be provided no later than
October 15, 1997. Further, the Committee directs that
$20,000,000 of the amount provided for the NATO infrastructure
account may not be obligated in any way, or expended, until 60
days after the receipt of the report.

Family Housing Overview

The Committee has provided $3,820,701,000 for family
housing construction, operations and maintenance, the
Department's new family housing improvements fund, and the
homeowners assistance program. This amount is $152,291,000
above the fiscal year 1998 budget request and $125,366,000
under the House allowance.
General and flag officer quarters.--The Committee agrees
with House report language concerning general and flag officer
quarters. The Committee further concurs with House report
language concerning all reporting requirements and
notifications for these type of quarters.

housing privatization initiative

The Committee notes the Department's efforts to develop new
privatization initiatives to meet the shortfall in adequate
family housing. Several projects are underway and many others
are under consideration. However, the Committee is concerned
that the Department is attempting to accelerate the program
without allowing time to assimilate lessons from the earlier
projects. The financial underpinnings of these authorities are
complex and require a shift of attitudes, which cannot be
accomplished in a matter of months.
The Secretary of Defense requested that the Congress
authorize an additional two rounds of base realignment and
closure (BRAC) with the first round beginning as early as 1999.
Both the House of Representatives and the Senate rejected this
proposal because of continuing concerns regarding the process,
costs, and need to complete closure actions from the previous
rounds. However, the Department of Defense may well be given
authority to conduct additional round(s) of base realignment
and closure sometime in the future.
When the Department assesses bases for closure, they
measure each installation against well-established selection
criteria. The Cost of Base Realignment Actions [COBRA] model
was used to evaluate installations during the past four BRAC
rounds. COBRA is heavily weighted to consider costs and return
on investment resulting from the closure.
Many of these proposed privatization initiatives contain
various mechanisms that shift financial risk and liability from
the private sector entity to the Government, mitigating
potential benefits from this initiative to the taxpayer. These
guarantees or considerations cover mortgage payments or
insulate private interests against future BRAC actions, force
reductions or extended deployments. The Department of Defense
can also provide guarantees for rent and occupancy levels if
necessary to secure private sector financing.
Housing privatization projects with these type of
guarantees raise troubling questions concerning Government
liability and budget implications in a BRAC environment. More
importantly, they could advantage those bases with these types
of projects because BRAC guarantees make them more expensive to
close or realign. It is conceivable that if two similar bases
are under consideration, the installation with the
privatization initiative, would score more favorably than the
base without a public/private housing venture.
Accordingly, the Committee has added a provision which
requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the congressional
defense committees of all family housing privatization
solicitations and agreements which contain any clause providing
consideration for base realignment and closure, force
reductions, and extended deployments.

Family Housing, Army

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $1,370,969,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 1,291,937,000
House allowance......................................... 1,351,068,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,317,037,000

The Committee recommends a total of $1,317,037,000 for
family housing, Army, in fiscal year 1998. This is $25,100,000
over the fiscal year 1998 budget request and $34,031,000 under
the House allowance. Specific details are included in the
tables at the end of the report.

Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $1,520,607,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 1,255,437,000
House allowance......................................... 1,385,682,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,339,123,000

The Committee recommends $1,339,123,000 for family housing,
Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 1998. This amount is
$83,686,000 over the fiscal year 1998 budget request and
$46,559,000 under the House allowance. Specific details are
included in the tables at the end of the report.

Family Housing, Air Force

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $1,134,016,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 1,083,362,000
House allowance......................................... 1,171,643,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,126,867,000

The Committee recommends $1,126,867,000 for family housing,
Air Force, in fiscal year 1998, which is $43,505,000 over the
budget request, and $44,776,000 under the House allowance.
Specific details are included in the tables at the end of the
report.

Family Housing, Defense-wide

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $35,334,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 37,674,000
House allowance......................................... 37,674,000
Committee recommendation................................ 37,674,000

The Committee recommends $37,674,000 for family housing,
defense-wide, in fiscal year 1998. This amount is equal to the
budget request and the House allowance. Specific details are
included in the tables at the end of the report.

Family Housing Improvement Fund

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $25,000,000
Budget estimate, 1998...................................................
House allowance.........................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

The Committee recommends no appropriation for the family
housing improvement fund in fiscal year 1998. No funds were
requested in the budget request. The House did not appropriate
funding for this initiative.
Additionally, the Committee has included a provision which
designates the family housing improvement fund as the sole
source of funds to finance the administrative costs for
military family and unaccompanied housing privatization
initiatives.

Homeowners Assistance Fund

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $36,181,000
Budget estimate, 1998...................................................
House allowance.........................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

The Committee recommends no appropriation for the
homeowners assistance fund [HAF]. This is equal to the budget
request for fiscal year 1998 and the House allowance. This
represents a decrease of $36,181,000 below the appropriations
for fiscal year 1997. This program benefits military personnel
and Federal civilian employee homeowners in locations where the
housing market becomes depressed due to an announcement of a
base closure or realignment of a military installation. The HAF
provides partial compensation to homeowners for their financial
losses incurred in the sale of their homes. The fund receives
funding from several sources: appropriations, borrowing
authority, revenue from sale of acquired properties,
reimbursable authorities, prior fiscal year unobligated
balances, and recovery of prior year obligations. Anticipated
expenditures for fiscal year 1998 are expected to be covered by
available prior-year funds and proceeds from the resale of
homes.

Base Closure Overview

The Committee has approved $2,060,854,000 for base closure
and realignment activities during fiscal year 1998. This amount
is $312,620 under the amount appropriated by Congress for
fiscal year 1997. A discussion of these activities is included
at the beginning of the report under the heading ``Base
Realignment and Closure.''
The Committee recommends providing full funding for these
important projects. To this end, the Committee provides the
following listing of the specific projects requested by the
Department and appropriated by the Committee for the BRAC
accounts. The Committee provides specific approval and
appropriated funds for the following construction projects:

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
[Fiscal year 1998 budget estimate, base realignment and closure, fiscal
year 1998 BRAC military construction projects]
[Dollars in thousands]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component/State/project description BRAC round Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army BRAC III construction, fiscal year
1998:
Texas: Fort Bliss: Repair aircraft III.............. $3,650
hangar (46865).
-------------------------------
Total for Army BRAC III ................. 3,650
construction, fiscal year 1998.
===============================
Army BRAC IV construction, fiscal year
1998:
Alaska: Fort Wainwright: Missile IV............... 600
test facility (46159).
===============================
California:
Camp Parks: Army Reserve center IV............... 9,500
facility (46206).
Sierra Army Depot: Consolidated IV............... 900
security (45872).
Travis AFB: Administrative IV............... 2,250
facility (47187).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, California.. ................. 12,650
===============================
Colorado:
Fitzsimmons Army Medical Center: IV............... 2,100
Sanitary sewer (46341).
Fort Carson: Readiness group IV............... 2,500
administrative facility (46413).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Colorado...... ................. 4,600
===============================
District of Columbia: Walter Reed
Army Medical Center: Nurse training
facility (463342).................. IV............... 1,500
===============================
Maryland:
Fort Detrick: Health clinic IV............... 650
(46329).
Fort Meade: Administrative IV............... 6,300
facility (47237).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Maryland...... ................. 6,950
===============================
Michigan: Detroit arsenal: Storage IV............... 5,900
facility (46300).
===============================
Missouri:
Fort Leonard Wood:
Range modifications (46094). IV............... 17,500
Military operations in IV............... 6,900
urbanized terrain facility
(45892).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Missouri.. ................. 24,400
===============================
Nevada:
Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant: IV............... 1,550
Warehouse (46217).
Nellis AFB: Administrative IV............... 3,850
facility (46291).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Nevada........ ................. 5,400
===============================
New York: Fort Totten: Storage IV............... 1,900
facility (46258).
===============================
South Carolina: Fort Jackson: DOD IV............... 4,600
polygraph instructional facility
(45839).
===============================
Virginia: Fort Pickett: Reserve IV............... 3,100
center building (46354).
===============================
Washington: Fort Lewis: Center for IV............... 3,150
health promotion (46056).
===============================
Various locations: Program IV............... 3,750
management.
-------------------------------
Total for Army BRAC IV ................. 78,500
construction, fiscal year 1998.
===============================
Navy BRAC III construction, fiscal year
1998:
California:
Naval Air Station Lemoore: III.............. 2,586
Administrative office (186T).
Marine Corps Air Station, III.............. 48,773
Miramar: Support facilities
(007T).
Pacific Fleet Antisubmarine
Warfare Training Center, San
Diego: Gymnasium (387T)........ III.............. 3,501
Naval Submarine Base, San Diego: III.............. 891
Pier renovation (124T).
Public works center, San Diego: III.............. 1,821
Public works shop (175T).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, California.... ................. 57,572
===============================
Florida:
Naval Aviation Depot, III.............. 5,074
Jacksonville: Administrative
building (220T).
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville:
Aviation physiology training
building (831T)................ III.............. 3,383
Naval Training Center, Orlando: III.............. 2,686
Facility modifications (001T).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, Florida....... ................. 11,143
===============================
Georgia: Naval Air Station, Atlanta: III.............. 9,053
Marine Reserve training facility
(906T).
===============================
Hawaii:
Pacific Missile Range Facility,
Barking Sands: Ordnance
facilities (297T)............. III.............. 612
Marine Corps Station, Kaneohe
Bay:
Aviation supply facilities III.............. 1,491
(274T).
Utilities upgrade (504T).... III.............. 2,168
Ordnance facilities (508T).. III.............. 1,160
Naval Station, Pearl Harbor: III.............. 1,005
Fleet Imaging Center (524T).
Public Works Center, Pearl III.............. 1,492
Harbor: Utility system
modifications (539T).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, Hawaii........ ................. 7,928
===============================
Virginia: Naval Station, Norfolk: III.............. 995
Administrative facility (360T).
===============================
Washington: Naval Hospital, III.............. 10,409
Bremerton: Outpatient clinic (019T).
===============================
Wisconsin: Fort McCoy: Equipment III.............. 2,295
maintenance facility (701T).
===============================
Total for Navy BRAC III ................. 99,395
construction, fiscal year 1998.
===============================
Navy BRAC IV construction, fiscal year
1998:
California:
Marine Corps Air Station,
Miramar: Administrative/
training spaces (020U)........ IV............... 1,403
Naval Air Station, North Island:
Operational facility and IV............... 28,750
parking (820U).
Intermediate maintenance IV............... 1,273
facility (822U).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, California ................. 31,426
===============================
District of Columbia: Commandant
Naval District, Washington: Naval
Sea Systems Command headquarters
relocation (088U).................. IV............... 86,045
===============================
Florida:
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville: IV............... 2,985
Medical/dental additions (231U).
S-3 Naval maintenance training IV............... 1,329
group: Modifications (239U).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, Florida....... ................. 4,314
===============================
Guam: Naval activities: Building IV............... 597
renovation (416U).
===============================
Pennsylvania: Naval Surface Warfare
Center, Philadelphia: Acoustics R&D
Facility (185U).................... IV............... 6,151
===============================
Virginia:
Naval Air Station, Oceana:
Flight simulator building IV............... 8,998
addition (160U).
Corrosion control hangar IV............... 4,775
(576U).
Hangar utilities IV............... 1,244
improvements (165U).
F/A 18 aviation maintenance IV............... 2,686
additions (164U).
Renovate/addition training IV............... 5,671
facility (161U).
Fleet Industrial Supply Center,
Williamsburg:
Building renovation (028U).. IV............... 2,437
Cargo staging area (029U)... IV............... 1,443
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, Virginia.. ................. 27,254
===============================
Total for Navy BRAC IV ................. 155,787
construction, fiscal year
1998.
===============================
Air Force BRAC III construction, fiscal
year 1998:
California: Travis AFB: Land III.............. 2,050
purchase (XDZT973300).
-------------------------------
Total for Air Force BRAC III ................. 2,050
construction, fiscal year 1998.
===============================
Air Force BRAC III family housing,
fiscal year 1998:
California: Travis AFB: Improve III.............. 46,010
family housing, 375 units
(XDAT950000).
-------------------------------
Total for Air Force BRAC III ................. 46,010
family housing, fiscal year 1998.
===============================
Air Force BRAC IV construction, fiscal
year 1998:
California:
Beale AFB:
Dining facility IV............... 2,100
(PRJ891009R1).
938 Engineering Installation IV............... 8,100
Squadron (PRJY911023R2).
Enlisted dormitory IV............... 9,000
(PRJY93103R2).
Add to child development IV............... 2,100
center (PRJY95301R1).
Vehicle maintenance facility IV............... 1,450
(PRJY953009R1).
Air Force Reserve KC-135 IV............... 1,700
flight simulator
(PRJY953046R1).
Palmdale Plant 42: Add/alter IV............... 580
secure warehouse (PRJY953008R2).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, ................. 25,030
California.
===============================
Colorado:
Falcon AFB:
Satellite control facility IV............... 16,000
(GLEN973008A).
Add to dining facility IV............... 500
(GLEN973009).
Technical support facility IV............... 6,400
(GLEN973010).
Alter operations support IV............... 760
facility (GLEN973020).
Add to fitness center IV............... 300
(GLEN973023).
Peterson AFB: Enlisted dormitory IV............... 1,200
(TDKA963004).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, ................. 25,160
Colorado.
===============================
New York:
Fort Drum:
Vehicle operations heated IV............... 1,700
parking (WOXG959613).
Add to fire station IV............... 300
(FPBB969510).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, New ................. 2,000
York.
===============================
Ohio: Wright-Patterson AFB: Renovate IV............... 2,500
support facility (PRJY921012R1).
===============================
Oklahoma: Vance AFB: Add to child IV............... 330
development center (XTLF983303).
===============================
Texas:
Brooks AFB: Add/alter life IV............... 3,900
sciences/textile laboratory
(CNBC993000).
Kelly AFB: Communications IV............... 2,500
infrastructure support
(MBPB993225R1).
Lackland AFB:
838th Engineer Installation IV............... 5,600
Squadron (MBPB993201R1).
Child development center IV............... 480
(MBPB993209R2).
Add to auto hobby shop IV............... 1,100
(MBPB993222R1).
Laughlin AFB: Engine staging IV............... 2,950
facility (MXDP973004R2).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, Texas.... ................. 16,530
===============================
Various locations: Planning and IV............... 4,157
design (BCL98RD4).
-------------------------------
Total for Air Force BRAC IV ................. 75,707
construction, fiscal year
1998.
===============================
Air Force BRAC IV family housing, fiscal
year 1998:
Texas: Lackland AFB: General IV............... 790
officers quarters (MBPB99203R2).
-------------------------------
Total for Air Force BRAC IV family ................. 790
housing, fiscal year 1998.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Defense Logistics Agency and Defense Information Systems Agency
BRAC III and IV Construction, Fiscal Year 1998. Defense Logistics
Agency and Defense Information Systems Agency have no construction
projects relating to any BRAC round requested in fiscal year 1998.

Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part I

The Committee recognizes that fiscal year 1995 was the last
year for appropriations into this account.

Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part II

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $352,800,000
Rescission.......................................... -35,391,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 317,409,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 116,754,000
House allowance......................................... 116,754,000
Committee recommendation................................ 116,754,000

The Committee recommends $116,754,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part II as authorized and
provided by the House allowance. This is a decrease of
$200,655,000 below the net amount appropriated for fiscal year
1997.

Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part III

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $971,925,000
Rescission.......................................... -75,638,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 896,287,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 768,702,000
House allowance......................................... 768,702,000
Committee recommendation................................ 768,702,000

The Committee recommends $768,702,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part III as authorized and
provided by the House allowance. This is a decrease of
$127,585,000 below the net appropriated for fiscal year 1997.

Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part IV

Appropriations, 1997.................................... $1,182,749,000
Rescission.......................................... -22,971,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Net............................................... 1,159,778,000
Budget estimate, 1998................................... 1,175,398,000
House allowance......................................... 1,175,398,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,175,398,000

The Committee recommends $1,175,398,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part IV as authorized and
provided by the House allowance. This is an increase of
$15,620,000 above the net amount appropriated for fiscal year
1997.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Committee has made no changes to sections 101-120 as
recommended by the House, sections 121-123 have been deleted by
the Committee.

committee recommended provisions

The Committee has added four general provisions to the
House-passed bill as follows:
Section 125 provides a reduction of $31,000,000 to the
Military Construction accounts of the Army, Navy, Air Force,
and Defense-wide, as well as to the ``NATO infrastructure'' and
``Base realignment and closure'' accounts. This reduction
reflects a reestimation of fiscal year 1998 inflation
undertaken by the Office of Management and Budget in June 1997.
Section 126 provides the Secretary of the Army authority to
complete a diver training facility at Key West Naval Air
Station, using an unspecified minor construction project.
Section 127 provides the Secretary of the Navy
discretionary authority to lease property in Hawaii to the city
and county of Honolulu.
Section 128 requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the
congressional defense committees of all family housing
privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any
clause providing consideration for base realignment and
closure, force reductions, and extended deployments.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
All projects for which appropriations are provided by the
Committee are anticipated to be authorized.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, the Committee
ordered reported en bloc H.R. 2016, Military Construction
appropriations bill, 1998, and S. 1033, an original
Agriculture, Rural Development appropriations bill, 1998,
subject to amendment and subject to their budget allocations,
and S. 1034, an original VA-HUD appropriations bill, subject to
amendment and subject to appropriate scoring, by a recorded
vote of 28-0, a quorum being present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Stevens
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Specter
Mr. Domenici
Mr. Bond
Mr. Gorton
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Burns
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mr. Campbell
Mr. Craig
Mr. Faircloth
Mrs. Hutchison
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Inouye
Mr. Hollings
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Bumpers
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Reid
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray
Mr. Dorgan
Mrs. Boxer

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the committee.''
In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is
proposed is shown in roman.
No change in existing statutes has been proposed.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate compared to--
House Committee -------------------------------
Installation and project Budget request allowance recommendation House
Budget request allowance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALABAMA

ARMY: REDSTONE ARSENAL: MICOM MISSILE READINESS SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
ANNEX.................................................................. .............. .............. 27,000 +27,000 +27,000
AIR FORCE:
MAXWELL AFB:
OTS ACADEMIC FACILITY........................................... 4,479 4,479 4,479 .............. ..............
OTS PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER..................................... 1,095 1,095 1,095 .............. ..............
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY................... .............. 9,300 .............. .............. -9,300
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ANNISTON CHEMICAL ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY.... 9,900 9,900 9,900 .............. ..............
REDSTONE ARSENAL, HUNTSVILLE: MISSILE SPACE INTELLIGENCE CENTER
(DIA).............................................................. 32,700 32,700 32,700 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DANNELLY FIELD: MUNITIONS COMPLEX/AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
SHOP................................................................... .............. .............. 4,800 +4,800 +4,800
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MAXWELL AFB: DATED AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE FACILITY..... .............. .............. 5,200 +5,200 +5,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA.................................................... 48,174 57,474 85,174 +37,000 +27,700

ALASKA

AIR FORCE:
CLEAR AFS:
ALTER DORMITORIES............................................... 20,285 20,285 20,285 .............. ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FACILITY................. 46,784 46,784 46,784 .............. ..............
EIELSON AFB:
A-10 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT.............. 7,764 7,764 7,764 .............. ..............
POTABLE WATER STORAGE UPGRADE................................... .............. .............. 6,000 +6,000 +6,000
ELMENDORF: ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS UPGRADE............................... .............. .............. 6,100 +6,100 +6,100
INDIAN MOUNTAIN: UPGRADE PETROLEUM, OIL, AND LUBRICANT SYSTEM....... 1,991 1,991 1,991 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: ELMENDORF AFB: REPLACE FUEL TANKAGE (DLA)................. 21,700 21,700 21,700 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BETHEL: ARMY GUARD AVIATION OPS FACILITY........... .............. .............. 4,600 +4,600 +4,600
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA..................................................... 98,524 98,524 115,224 +16,700 +16,700

ARIZONA

ARMY: FORT HUACHUCA: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL..................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 .............. ..............
NAVY:
CAMP NAVAJO NAVY DETACHMENT: MAGAZINE MODIFICATIONS (PHASE II)...... 11,426 11,426 11,426 .............. ..............
YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS........... .............. 12,250 .............. .............. -12,250
AIR FORCE: LUKE AFB: LAND PURCHASE, GOLDWATER RANGE..................... .............. 10,000 .............. .............. -10,000
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: PAPAGO MILITARY RESERVATION: COMBINED SUPPORT
MAINTENANCE SHOPS...................................................... .............. .............. 11,000 +11,000 +11,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA.................................................... 31,426 53,676 42,426 +11,000 -11,250

ARKANSAS

ARMY: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION SUPPORT FACILITY.. .............. 15,000 .............. .............. -15,000
AIR FORCE: LITTLE ROCK AFB: CONTROL TOWER............................... .............. 3,400 3,400 +3,400 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF CHEMICAL ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY............................................................... 44,000 .............. .............. -44,000 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
HAZEN:
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP................................. 1,345 1,345 1,345 .............. ..............
READINESS CENTER................................................ 2,261 2,261 2,261 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS............................................... 47,606 22,006 7,006 -40,600 -15,000

CALIFORNIA

ARMY: CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION: ORDNANCE SUPPORT FACILITY.......... 23,000 23,000 23,000 .............. ..............
FORT IRWIN:
LIVE FIRE COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY.......................... .............. 2,650 .............. .............. -2,650
ROTATIONAL WASH POINT........................................... .............. 8,500 .............. .............. -8,500
NAVY:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY.......................... 4,300 4,300 4,300 .............. ..............
AVIATION TRAINING AREA.......................................... .............. 10,130 .............. .............. -10,130
EMERGENCY SPILL CONTROL......................................... 2,840 2,840 2,840 .............. ..............
HIGHBAY WAREHOUSE............................................... 6,880 6,880 6,880 .............. ..............
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS...................................... 12,000 12,000 12,000 .............. ..............
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS...................................... .............. 16,120 .............. .............. -16,120
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT.............................................. 5,600 5,600 5,600 .............. ..............
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER........................................ .............. 4,480 .............. .............. -4,480
RIVER FLOOD CONTROL (SANTA MARGARITA)........................... 21,869 21,869 21,869 .............. ..............
CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE: WATERFRONT OPERATIONS BUILDING...... .............. 10,100 .............. .............. -10,100
EL CENTRO NAVAL AIR FACILITY: ORDNANCE FACILITIES................... 11,000 11,000 11,000 .............. ..............
MIRAMAR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: ENLISTED DINING FACILITY.......... 8,700 8,700 8,700 .............. ..............
NORTH ISLAND NAVAL AIR STATION:
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT FACILITIES.................................. 15,300 15,300 15,300 .............. ..............
SEAWALL UPGRADE................................................. 2,900 2,900 2,900 .............. ..............
VISUAL SYSTEM TRAINER BUILDING ADDITION......................... 1,400 1,400 1,400 .............. ..............
PORT HUENEME NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATALLION CENTER: STORMWATER RUNOFF
IMPROVEMENTS....................................................... .............. 3,200 .............. .............. -3,200
TWENTYNINE PALMS MARCORP AIR-GRND COMB CTR: COMMUNICATION/
ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY....................... 3,810 3,810 3,810 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
EDWARDS AFB:
ADD/ALTER SEWER LINE............................................ 1,394 1,394 1,394 .............. ..............
UPGRADE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.............................. 1,493 1,493 1,493 .............. ..............
VANDENBERG AFB: LAUNCH OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER.................... 26,876 26,876 26,876 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
NAVAL AIR STATION (NORTH ISLAND): WATERFRONT OPERATIONS SUPPORT
FACILITY........................................................... 7,400 7,400 7,400 .............. ..............
SAN DIEGO NAVAL STATION: ADD/ALTER ENVIRONMNETAL PREVEN MEDICAL UNIT 2,100 2,100 2,100 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FRESNO AIR TERMINAL: BASE SUPPLY COMPLEX............ .............. 7,000 .............. .............. -7,000
ARMY RESERVE: SACRAMENTO: US ARMY RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/AREA MAINTENANCE SUPPORT ACTIVITY..................... 20,972 20,972 20,972 .............. ..............
NAVAL RESERVE:
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION (SEAL BEACH): MARINE CORPS RESERVE TRAINING
CENTER............................................................. 6,104 6,104 6,104 .............. ..............
PASADENA: MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER............................... .............. .............. 6,690 +6,690 +6,690
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA................................................. 185,938 248,118 192,628 +6,690 -55,490

COLORADO

ARMY:
FORT CARSON:
CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER BUILDING.......................... 7,300 7,300 7,300 .............. ..............
RAIL YARD EXPANSION (PHASE I)................................... .............. 16,000 .............. .............. -16,000
AIR FORCE:
BUCKLEY ANG BASE:
ADD TO SECURITY POLICE FACILITY................................. 348 348 348 .............. ..............
ADMINISTRATION FACILITY......................................... 6,370 6,370 6,370 .............. ..............
FALCON AFS: DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD..................................... 10,551 10,551 10,551 .............. ..............
PETERSON AFB: ADD/ALTER DORMITORY................................... 4,081 4,081 4,081 .............. ..............
US AIR FORCE ACADEMY:
ADD/ALTER FITNESS CENTER........................................ 5,375 5,375 5,375 .............. ..............
UPGRADE ACADEMIC FACILITY....................................... 9,854 9,854 9,854 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT CARSON: MATES EXPANSION (PHASE I)............. .............. .............. 2,863 +2,863 +2,863
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
BUCKLEY ANGB: UPGRADE BASE INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS................... 12,800 12,800 12,800 .............. ..............
GREELEY ANGS: MOBILE GROUNDS STATION MAINTENANCE COMPLEX............ .............. 4,700 4,700 +4,700 ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO................................................... 56,679 77,379 64,242 +7,563 -13,137

CONNECTICUT

NAVY:
NEW LONDON NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER........................................ .............. .............. 3,660 +3,660 +3,660
CONTROLLED INDUSTRIAL FACILITY.................................. 18,300 18,300 18,300 .............. ..............
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM.......................................... .............. .............. 1,600 +1,600 +1,600
DEFENSE-WIDE: NAVAL SUB BASE NEW LONDON: ADD/ALTER NAVAL UNDERSEA MED
INSTITUTE.............................................................. 2,300 2,300 2,300 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONNECTICUT................................................ 20,600 20,600 25,860 +5,260 +5,260

DELAWARE

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NEW CASTLE AIRPORT: REPLACE SQUADRON OPS/AEROMED
EVAC FACILITY.......................................................... .............. .............. 7,000 +7,000 +7,000

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEFENSE-WIDE: BOLLING AFB: RECONFIGURATION DIAC......................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 .............. ..............
NAVAL RESERVE: NAVAL AIR FACILITY, WASHINGTON, DC (ANDREWS AFB):
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS............................................. 4,640 4,640 4,640 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA....................................... 11,640 11,640 11,640 .............. ..............

FLORIDA

NAVY:
JACKSONVILLE NAVAL AIR STATION:
ORDNANCE LOADING APRON.......................................... 1,330 1,330 1,330 .............. ..............
TACTICAL SUPPORT CENTER......................................... 2,150 2,150 2,150 .............. ..............
MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: PIER IMPROVEMENTS............................ .............. 17,940 .............. .............. -17,940
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION: RUNWAY UPGRADES.................... .............. 1,300 .............. .............. -1,300
AIR FORCE:
EGLIN AFB AUXILIARY FIELD #9 (HURLBURT FIELD): DORMITORY............ 6,470 6,470 6,470 .............. ..............
MACDILL AFB:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER........................................ .............. 3,350 .............. .............. -3,350
EDUCATION CENTER AND LIBRARY.................................... .............. 4,750 .............. .............. -4,750
REMEDIATE SMALL ARMS RANGE...................................... 1,543 1,543 1,543 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
EGLIN AFB: ASSAULT STRIP RUNWAY..................................... .............. .............. 5,100 +5,100 +5,100
EGLIN AFB AUXILIARY FIELD #9 (HURLBURT FIELD):
SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS........................................... 2,450 2,450 2,450 .............. ..............
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMU AC-130.................................. 6,100 6,100 6,100 .............. ..............
NAS JACKSONVILLE: REPLACE FUEL TANKAGE.............................. 9,800 9,800 9,800 .............. ..............
PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION: MEDICAL CLINIC ADDITION (NAMI)......... 2,750 2,750 2,750 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ELLYSON FIELD: READINESS CENTER.................... .............. .............. 3,800 +3,800 +3,800
AIR FORCE RESERVE: EGLIN AFB, AUXILIARY FIELD #3 (DUKE FIELD): RENOVATE
VISITING AIRMEN DORMITORY.............................................. .............. .............. 7,300 +7,300 +7,300
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA.................................................... 32,593 59,933 48,793 +16,200 -11,140

GEORGIA

ARMY:
FORT GORDON: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL......................... 22,000 22,000 22,000 .............. ..............
FORT STEWART (HUNTER ARMY AIR FIELD): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL
(PHASE I)......................................................... .............. 17,500 .............. .............. -17,500
AIR FORCE:
MOODY AFB:
DORMITORIES..................................................... .............. 9,100 .............. .............. -9,100
HH-60 RESCUE OPERATIONS FACILITY................................ .............. .............. 6,800 +6,800 +6,800
ROBINS AFB:
JSTARS:
ADD/ALTER SUPPLY WAREHOUSE.................................. 2,538 2,538 2,538 .............. ..............
ADD/ALTER UTILITIES......................................... 1,891 1,891 1,891 .............. ..............
ADD/ALTER WING COMMAND POST................................. 498 498 498 .............. ..............
AGE STORAGE/SHOP FACILITY................................... 5,972 5,972 5,972 .............. ..............
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR................................. 7,764 7,764 7,764 .............. ..............
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER......................................... .............. 9,100 .............. .............. -9,100
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BENNING: BATTALION AND COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY............. 9,814 9,814 9,814 .............. ..............
FORT STEWART/HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD: COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 .............. ..............
ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE: ADD/ALTER AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE CENTER...... 19,000 19,000 19,000 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ROBINS AFB:
B-1:
AIRCRAFT ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOPS................... 520 520 520 .............. ..............
COMPOSITE SQUADRON OPERATIONS COMPLEX....................... 5,300 5,300 5,300 .............. ..............
POWER CHECK PAD AND SOUND SUPPRESSER........................ 1,000 1,000 1,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA............................................ 78,797 114,497 85,597 +6,800 -28,900

HAWAII

ARMY: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL................ 44,000 44,000 44,000 .............. ..............
NAVY:
FORT DERUSSEY: ASIAN PACIFIC CENTER................................. .............. .............. 9,500 +9,500 +9,500
KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS.... 19,000 19,000 19,000 .............. ..............
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL STATION: OILY WASTE COLLECTION TREATMENT FACILITY 25,000 25,000 25,000 .............. ..............
WAHIAWA NAVAL COMMUNICATION AREA MASTER STA EASTPAC: FITNESS CENTER
ADDITION AND RENOVATION............................................ 3,900 3,900 3,900 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
PEARL HARBOR (FORD ISLAND): DFAS--REGIONAL FINANCE CENTER........... 10,000 10,000 10,000 .............. ..............
PEARL HARBOR NS: ADVANCED SEAL DELIVERY SYSTEM FACILITY (PHASE II).. .............. .............. 7,400 +7,400 +7,400
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BELLOWS AFB: ADD/ALT ADMIN/TRAINING FACILITY........................ .............. .............. 5,184 +5,184 +5,184
WHEELER ARMY AIRFIELD (WAHIAWA): AVIATION, FIXED WING HANGAR........ 2,100 2,100 2,100 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: HICKMAN AFB: REPLACE BASE CIVIL ENGINEER MAINENANCE
COMPLEX................................................................ .............. .............. 4,500 +4,500 +4,500
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII..................................................... 104,000 104,000 130,584 +26,584 +26,584

IDAHO

AIR FORCE:
MOUNTAIN HOME AFB:
B-1B:
ARMAMENT SHOP............................................... 2,688 2,688 2,688 .............. ..............
AVIONICS BLDG............................................... .............. .............. 9,200 +9,200 +9,200
DORMITORY................................................... 8,959 8,959 8,959 .............. ..............
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT............... 6,072 6,072 6,072 .............. ..............
F-15C SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY.............................. .............. .............. 3,750 +3,750 +3,750
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN FIELD: ADD/ALT AVIATION READINESS CENTER..... .............. .............. 3,673 +3,673 +3,673
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
BOISE AIR TERMINAL (GOWEN FIELD):
C-130:
COMPOSITE HANGAR AND MAINTENANCE SHOPS...................... 12,000 12,000 12,000 .............. ..............
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AERIAL PORT TRAINING FAC................ .............. .............. 8,800 +8,800 +8,800
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO.............................................. 29,719 29,719 55,142 +25,423 +25,423

ILLINOIS

NAVY:
GREAT LAKES NAVAL HOSPITAL: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS (PHASE II)... 5,200 5,200 5,200 .............. ..............
GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING CENTER:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS...................................... 26,690 26,690 26,690 .............. ..............
COMBAT TRAINING POOL............................................ 9,930 9,930 9,930 .............. ..............
FIRE STATION.................................................... 2,600 2,600 2,600 .............. ..............
RECREATION CENTER............................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS............................................... 46,420 46,420 46,420 .............. ..............

INDIANA

ARMY: CRANE ARMY AMMUNITION ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION CONTAINERIZATION
COMPLEX (PHASE I)..................................................... 7,700 7,700 7,700 .............. ..............
NAVY: CRANE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER: CHEM-BIO WARFARE DETECTION
CENTER................................................................. .............. 4,120 .............. .............. -4,120
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP ATTERBURY RESERVE FORCES TRNG AREA
(EDINBURGH): MULTI-PURPOSE TRAINING RANGE (MPTR)....................... 10,229 10,229 10,229 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT WAYNE IAP: REPLACE DINING HALL/MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY....... .............. .............. 5,900 +5,900 +5,900
HULMAN AIRPORT: REPLACE FUEL CELL/CORRISON CONTROL FACILITY AND FIRE .............. .............. 5,400 +5,400 +5,400
AIR FORCE RESERVE: GRISSOM AIR RESERVE BASE: BASE CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX .............. 8,913 .............. .............. -8,913
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA.................................................... 17,929 30,962 29,229 +11,300 -1,733

IOWA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP DODGE (JOHNSTON): BATALLION COMPLEX (PHASE IV) 4,529 4,529 4,529 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: REPLACE SECURITY
POLICE OPERATIONS FACILITY............................................. .............. 3,900 .............. .............. -3,900
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, IOWA....................................................... 4,529 8,429 4,529 .............. -3,900

KANSAS

ARMY:
FORT LEAVENWORTH: U.S. DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS (PHASE I).............. 63,000 20,000 36,500 -26,500 +16,500
FORT RILEY:
CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER BUILDING.......................... 7,300 7,300 7,300 .............. ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.................................. 18,500 18,500 18,500 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
MCCONNELL AFB:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER........................................ .............. 5,000 .............. .............. -5,000
KC-135:
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT #3.................. 6,669 6,669 6,669 .............. ..............
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIR MAINTENANCE UNIT #4................. .............. .............. 9,700 +9,700 +9,700
TRANSPORTATION COMPLEX.......................................... .............. .............. 2,850 +2,850 +2,850
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: IOLA: ADD/ALTER READINESS CENTER................... 1,454 1,454 1,454 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: MCCONNELL AFB: ALTER BASE CIVIL ENGINEER MAINTENANCE
SHOP................................................................... .............. 2,000 2,000 +2,000 ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS..................................................... 96,923 60,923 84,973 -11,950 +24,050

KENTUCKY

ARMY:
FORT CAMPBELL:
EDUCATION CENTER (PHASE II)..................................... .............. 6,700 6,700 +6,700 ..............
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT SHOP (PHASE II).............................. .............. .............. 9,900 +9,900 +9,900
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.................................. 37,000 37,000 37,000 .............. ..............
FORT KNOX:
QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE (QTR).............................. .............. 7,200 7,200 +7,200 ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.................................. 22,000 22,000 22,000 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT CAMPBELL: CONSOLIDATED TROOP MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC... 13,600 13,600 13,600 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GREENVILLE: WEST KENTUCKY TRAINING RANGE (PHASE
III)................................................................... .............. .............. 9,321 +9,321 +9,321
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY................................................... 72,600 86,500 105,721 +33,121 +19,221

LOUISIANA

AIR FORCE:
BARKSDALE AFB:
CONVENTIONAL AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE INTEGRATED MAINTENANCE
COMPLEX........................................................ 11,148 11,148 11,148 .............. ..............
CONVENTIONAL AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE STORAGE IGLOOS........... 8,262 8,262 8,262 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP BEAUREGARD: MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE..................... .............. .............. 1,292 +1,292 +1,292
JACKSON BARRACKS (NEW ORLEANS): ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP
(OMS).............................................................. 1,516 1,516 1,516 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR STATION: BASE CIVIL ENGINEER
AND COMMUNICATIONS COMPLEX............................................. .............. 5,900 .............. .............. -5,900
NAVAL RESERVE:
NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR STATION:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS (PHASE II)........................... .............. 4,520 .............. .............. -4,520
PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITY....................................... .............. 3,550 .............. .............. -3,550
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, LOUISIANA.............................................. 20,926 34,896 22,218 +1,292 -12,678

MAINE

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BANGOR IAP: UPGRADE BASE FACILITIES................. .............. .............. 6,500 +6,500 +6,500

MARYLAND

NAVY:
PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER/AIRCRAFT DIV ADVANCED SYSTEM
INTEGRATION FACILITY (PHASE V)..................................... 9,000 9,000 9,000 .............. ..............
ST INIGOES NAVAL ELEC SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ACTIVITY MAINTENANCE
HANGAR............................................................. .............. 2,610 .............. .............. -2,610
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT DETRICK: HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC.................................. 4,650 4,650 4,650 .............. ..............
FOREST GLEN (WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH): ARMY INSTITUTE
OF RESEARCH (PHASE V).............................................. 20,000 20,000 20,000 .............. ..............
FORT MEADE:
FANX III PURCHASE............................................... 25,200 25,200 25,200 .............. ..............
VEHICLE AND CARGO INSPECTION FACILITY........................... 4,000 4,000 4,000 .............. ..............
VISITOR CONTROL CENTERS......................................... 600 600 600 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ANNAPOLIS: ADD/ALT READINESS CENTER................ .............. .............. 2,947 +2,947 +2,947
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND................................................... 63,450 66,060 66,397 +2,947 +337

MASSACHUSETTS

DEFENSE-WIDE: WESTOVER ARB: JET FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX.................... 4,700 4,700 4,700 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BARNES ANGB: REPLACE DINING HALL.................... .............. 3,050 3,050 +3,050 ..............
NAVAL RESERVE: WESTOVER ARB: BUILDING RENOVATION........................ .............. 4,090 .............. .............. -4,090
AIR FORCE RESERVE: WESTOVER ARB: FIRE TRAINING FACILITY................. 1,800 1,800 1,800 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS.............................................. 6,500 13,640 9,550 +3,050 -4,090

MICHIGAN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: AUGUSTA: READINESS CENTER.......................... .............. .............. 6,356 +6,356 +6,356
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ALPENA COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT (ALPENA): AIRCREW
COMBAT TRAINING SYSTEM RANGE SUPPORT AND RADAR APPROACH CONTROL
FACILITY............................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SELFRIDGE AGB: REPLACE VEHICLE MAINT/COMMUNICATIONS
COMPLEX................................................................ .............. .............. 9,000 +9,000 +9,000
ARMY RESERVE: WALKER: READINESS CENTER/OMS.............................. .............. .............. 9,439 +9,439 +9,439
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MICHIGAN................................................... 5,000 5,000 29,795 +24,795 +24,795

MINNESOTA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
REPLACE BASE CIVIL ENGINEER MAINTENANCE COMPLEX................. .............. 4,600 .............. .............. -4,600
VEHICLE WASH FACILITY........................................... 360 360 360 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: ADD/ALTER
AIRCRAFT CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY.................................... 1,550 1,550 1,550 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MINNESOTA.................................................. 1,910 6,510 1,910 .............. -4,600

MISSISSIPPI

NAVY:
GULFPORT: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS (PHASE I AND II)............... .............. .............. 22,440 +22,440 +22,440
MERIDIAN NAVAL AIR STATION: RENOVATE THREE BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS........................................................... .............. 7,050 7,050 +7,050 ..............
AIR FORCE: KEESLER AFB: STUDENT DORMITORIES............................. 30,855 30,855 30,855 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: MISSISSIPPI ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT: ON AND MAINTENANCE
FACILITY............................................................... .............. .............. 9,900 +9,900 +9,900
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SENATOBIA: READINESS CENTER........................ .............. .............. 4,425 +4,425 +4,425
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
GULFPORT-BILOXI REGIONAL AIRPORT:
REGIONAL FIRE TRAINING FACILITY................................. 900 900 900 .............. ..............
REPLACE TROOP TRAINING QUARTERS/DINING HALL..................... .............. 9,500 9,500 +9,500 ..............
KEY FIELD:
REGIONAL KC-135 SIMULATION TRAINING FACILITY.................... .............. 2,000 2,000 +2,000 ..............
REPLACE DINING HALL............................................. .............. 3,200 3,200 +3,200 ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI............................................ 31,755 53,505 90,270 +58,515 +36,765

MISSOURI

ARMY: FORT LEONARD WOOD: FIRE STATION................................... .............. 3,200 .............. .............. -3,200
AIR FORCE:
WHITEMAN AFB:
B-2:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE DOCKS.................................. 17,419 17,419 17,419 .............. ..............
LOW OBSERVABILITY RESTORATION FAC (PHASE I)................. .............. 12,000 .............. .............. -12,000
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MACON: ARMORY...................................... .............. .............. 3,210 +3,210 +3,210
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI................................................... 17,419 32,619 20,629 +3,210 -11,990

MONTANA

AIR FORCE: MALMSTROM AFB: ADD/ALT AIRMEN DINING FACILITY................ .............. .............. 4,500 +4,500 +4,500
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BILLINGS: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER.............. .............. .............. 14,950 +14,950 +14,950
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA.................................................... .............. .............. 19,450 +19,450 +19,450

NEBRASKA

AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AFB: DORMITORIES...................................... .............. .............. 6,900 +6,900 +6,900

NEVADA

AIR FORCE:
NELLIS AFB:
LAND ACQUISITION................................................ .............. .............. 5,900 +5,900 +5,900
MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY.................................. .............. 1,950 .............. .............. -1,950
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: RENO/TAHOE IAP: C-130 AERIAL PORT TRAINING FACILITY. .............. .............. 2,950 +2,950 +2,950
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA..................................................... .............. 1,950 8,850 +8,850 +6,900

NEW JERSEY

ARMY: FORT MONMOUTH: FIRE STATION....................................... .............. 2,050 .............. .............. -2,050
AIR FORCE:
MCGUIRE AFB:
AIR MOBILITY GROUP (AMOG) WAREHOUSE............................. 9,954 9,954 9,954 .............. ..............
FIRE STATION.................................................... .............. 8,800 .............. .............. -8,800
DEFENSE-WIDE: MCGUIRE AFB: AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE CENTER REPLACEMENT.... 35,217 35,217 35,217 .............. ..............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DIX: AMMUNITION SUPPLY FACILITY...................... .............. 9,031 .............. .............. -9,031
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY................................................. 45,171 65,052 45,171 .............. -19,881

NEW MEXICO

ARMY:
WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE:
LAUNCH COMPLEX REVITALIZATION................................... .............. 6,900 .............. .............. -6,900
NATIONAL RANGE CONTROL CENTER (PHASE II)........................ 18,000 18,000 18,000 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
CANNON AFB: F-16 MISSILE MAINTENANCE SHOP........................... .............. .............. 2,900 +2,900 +2,900
KIRKLAND AFB:
FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING FACILITY............................. .............. .............. 14,000 +14,000 +14,000
REPLACE MANZANO BRIDGE.......................................... .............. .............. 6,300 +6,300 +6,300
DEFENSE-WIDE: HOLLOMAN AFB: DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: TAOS: READINESS CENTER............................. .............. .............. 3,225 +3,225 +3,225
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
KIRKLAND AFB:
COMPOSITE SUPPORT FACILITY...................................... .............. .............. 3,100 +3,100 +3,100
ADD/ALT SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY............................ .............. .............. 2,800 +2,800 +2,800
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO............................................. 21,000 27,900 53,325 +32,325 +25,425

NEW YORK

ARMY:
FORT DRUM:
AERIAL GUNNERY RANGE............................................ .............. 17,500 .............. .............. -17,500
MILITARY TRAINING AND EDUCATION CENTER.......................... .............. 6,900 .............. .............. -6,900
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
GABRESKI AIRPORT: REPLACE VEHICLE AND AGE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX....... .............. .............. 4,250 +4,250 +4,250
NIAGARA FALLS IAP: CONSOLIDATED TRAINING FACILITY................... .............. .............. 2,100 +2,100 +2,100
SCHENECTADY COUNTY AIRPORT: FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR.. 5,700 5,700 5,700 .............. ..............
STRATTON ANGB (SCHENECTADY): COMPOSITE SUPPORT COMPLEX.............. .............. 7,500 .............. .............. -7,500
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK................................................... 5,700 37,600 12,050 +6,350 -25,550

NORTH CAROLINA

ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
MOUT TRAINING COMPLEX (PHASE I)................................. .............. 7,900 7,900 +7,900 ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL (PHASE I)........................ .............. 9,800 .............. .............. -9,800
NAVY:
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
FACILITIES......................................................... 8,800 8,800 8,800 .............. ..............
NEW RIVER MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:
AVIATION MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY.......................... 6,600 6,600 6,600 .............. ..............
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS...................................... 10,600 10,600 10,600 .............. ..............
TACTICAL SUPPORT VAN PADS....................................... 2,700 2,700 2,700 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
POPE AFB:
DORMITORIES..................................................... 8,356 8,356 8,356 .............. ..............
DORMITORIES..................................................... .............. 9,700 .............. .............. -9,700
FAMILY SERVICES CENTER.......................................... .............. 2,600 .............. .............. -2,600
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BRAGG:
ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE FACILITY................................ 1,000 1,000 1,000 .............. ..............
SECURITY UPGRADES............................................... 500 500 500 .............. ..............
SOF MEDICAL TRAINING BARRACKS................................... .............. .............. 8,300 +8,300 +8,300
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CHARLOTTE/DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: ALTER FUEL
SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE AND CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY..................... 2,550 2,550 2,550 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA............................................. 41,106 71,106 57,306 +16,200 -13,800

NORTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE:
GRAND FORKS AFB:
KC-135:
ADD/ALTER FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY......................... 1,493 1,493 1,493 .............. ..............
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT..................... 7,067 7,067 7,067 .............. ..............
MINOT AFB: FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION................................ .............. 5,200 5,200 +5,200 ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA............................................... 8,560 13,760 13,760 +5,200 ..............

OHIO

AIR FORCE:
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB:
ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT COMPLEX (PHASE IVA)...................... .............. .............. 22,000 +22,000 +22,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER........................................ .............. 8,600 .............. .............. -8,600
RENOVATE ACQUISITION SUPPORT FACILITY........................... 10,750 10,750 10,750 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
COLUMBUS CENTER: DFAS--REGIONAL FINANCE CENTER...................... 23,922 23,922 23,922 .............. ..............
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB: ALTER COMPOSITE MEDICAL FACILITY.............. 2,750 2,750 2,750 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
RICKENBACKER ANGB: FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY......... .............. 5,500 5,700 +5,700 +200
SPRINGFIELD ANGB: BASE SUPPLY COMPLEX............................... .............. 4,350 4,350 +4,350 ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
YOUNGSTOWN ARS:
ADD/ALTER BASE SUPPLY........................................... 2,800 2,800 2,800 .............. ..............
ADD/ALTER MISCELLANEOUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY.................... 1,000 1,000 1,000 .............. ..............
ADD/ALTER SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY.......................... 1,400 1,400 1,400 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO................................................... 42,622 61,072 74,672 +32,050 +13,600

OKLAHOMA

ARMY: FORT SILL: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL......................... .............. 8,000 8,000 +8,000 ..............
AIR FORCE:
ALTUS AFB: LAND PURCHASE CLEAR ZONE................................. .............. .............. 11,000 +11,000 +11,000
TINKER AFB: B-2 ADD/ALTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FACILITY............. 9,655 9,655 9,655 .............. ..............
VANCE AFB: BASE ENGINEERING COMPLEX................................. .............. 6,700 7,700 +7,700 +1,000
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: WILL ROGERS WORLD AIRPORT: REPLACE AEROMEDICAL
EVACUATION TRAINING FACILITY........................................... .............. .............. 3,100 +3,100 +3,100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA................................................... 9,655 24,355 39,455 +29,800 +15,100

OREGON

DEFENSE-WIDE: UMATILLA CHEMICAL DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE III).................................................. 57,427 57,427 57,427 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SALEM: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER................. .............. .............. 11,807 +11,807 +11,807
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: KLAMATH FALLS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: VEHICLE
REFUELING SHOP AND PAINT BAY........................................... 520 520 520 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OREGON..................................................... 57,947 57,947 69,754 +11,807 +11,807

PENNSYLVANIA

DEFENSE-WIDE: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT (NEW CUMBERLAND): ADDITION TO
DISTRIBUTION CENTER.................................................... 15,500 15,500 15,500 .............. ..............
ARMY RESERVE: OAKDALE: RESERVE CENTER/ORGAN MAINT/AREA MAINT SPT........ .............. .............. 24,914 +24,914 +24,914
NAVAL RESERVE: JOHNSTOWN: RESERVE HANGAR AND TRAINING CENTER............ .............. 13,980 .............. .............. -13,980
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA............................................... 15,500 29,480 40,414 +24,914 +10,934

RHODE ISLAND

NAVY: NEWPORT NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER DIVISION: UNDERWATER WEAPON
SYSTEM LABORATORY...................................................... 8,900 8,900 8,900 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: QUONSET STATE AIRPORT (N KINGSTON): ADD TO FUEL
SYSTEM/CORROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE FACILITY.......................... 355 355 355 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND............................................... 9,255 9,255 9,255 .............. ..............

SOUTH CAROLINA

ARMY:
CHARLESTON NAVAL WEAPONS STATION: ARMY STRATEGIC MAINTENANCE COMPLEX
(PHASE III)........................................................ 7,700 7,700 7,700 .............. ..............
FORT JACKSON: EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTER............................. .............. 5,400 .............. .............. -5,400
NAVY:
BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS...................................... .............. 15,330 .............. .............. -15,330
COMBAT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP................................. .............. 2,400 .............. .............. -2,400
PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT: INDOOR SIMULATOR
MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING FACILITY..................................... 3,200 3,200 3,200 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE: SHAW AFB: INFORMATION WARFARE SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY... 6,072 6,072 6,072 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: LEESBURG TRAINING SITE: REGIONAL SIMULATION CENTER. .............. .............. 3,823 +3,823 +3,823
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MCENTIRE ANGB:
DINING FACILITY/JOINT MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY................. .............. .............. 7,000 +7,000 +7,000
ADD/ALTER FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY.............. 1,500 1,500 1,500 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA......................................... 18,472 41,602 29,295 +10,823 -12,307

SOUTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION..................... .............. 6,600 6,600 +6,600 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: RAPID CITY: AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY.............. .............. .............. 5,200 +5,200 +5,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA............................................... .............. 6,600 11,800 +11,800 +5,200

TENNESSEE

AIR FORCE:
ARNOLD AFB:
ATMOSPHERIC AIR DRYER FACILITY.................................. .............. 9,900 .............. .............. -9,900
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY................................... 10,750 10,750 10,750 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: MILLINGTON NAVAL AIR STATION: DFAS--REGIONAL FINANCE
CENTER................................................................. 6,906 6,906 6,906 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NASHVILLE METRO AIRPORT: REPLACE BASE CIVIL ENGINEER
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX.................................................... .............. 3,350 .............. .............. -3,350
ARMY RESERVE: KNOXVILLE: USARC/OMS/AMSA................................. .............. 8,291 .............. .............. -8,291
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TENNESSEE.................................................. 17,656 39,197 17,656 .............. -21,541

TEXAS

ARMY:
FORT BLISS: AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT EXPANSION (PHASE II)............ .............. 7,700 .............. .............. -7,700
FORT HOOD: FORCE XXI SOLDIER DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL (PHASE I)........... .............. 12,800 12,800 .............. ..............
FORT SAM HOUSTON: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.................... 16,000 16,000 16,000 .............. ..............
NAVY: CORPUS CHRISTI NAVAL AIR STATION: BOILER PLANT REPLACEMENT........ .............. 800 .............. .............. -800
AIR FORCE:
DYESS AFB: B-1 SQUADRON OPS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT............... .............. 10,000 10,000 +10,000 ..............
LAUGHLIN AFB: CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY............................ .............. 4,800 .............. .............. -4,800
RANDOLPH AFB: JOINT PRIMARY AIRCRAFT TRAINING SYSTEM--ADD/ALTER
VARIOUS FACILITIES................................................. 2,488 2,488 2,488 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: LACKLAND AFB: BLOOD DONOR CENTER.......................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SAN ANTONIO: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP (OMS). 2,475 2,475 2,475 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS...................................................... 23,963 60,063 46,763 +22,800 -13,300

UTAH

AIR FORCE: HILL AFB: PEACEKEEPER STORAGE FACILITIES..................... 6,470 6,470 6,470 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: HILL AFB: CLINIC ADDITION................................. 3,100 3,100 3,100 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
OREM: READINESS CENTER.............................................. 5,746 5,746 5,746 .............. ..............
RICHFIELD: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP.......................... 1,045 1,045 1,045 .............. ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
COMPOSITE OPS/TRNG SQUADRON OPERATIONS COMPLEX.................. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
VEHICLE WASHING AND CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY.................. 460 460 460 .............. ..............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DOUGLAS: USARC/OMS................................... .............. 12,714 12,714 +12,714 ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH....................................................... 16,821 29,535 29,535 +12,714 ..............

VERMONT

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP JOHNSON: COMBINED SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE SHOP .............. .............. 6,719 +6,719 +6,719

VIRGINIA

ARMY:
CHARLOTTESVILLE: NATIONAL GROUND INTELLIGENCE CENTER PLANNING AND
DESIGN............................................................. 3,100 .............. .............. -3,100 ..............
FT A P HILL: CENTRAL VEHICLE WASH FACILITY.......................... 5,400 5,400 5,400 .............. ..............
FORT MYER: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL........................... 8,200 8,200 8,200 .............. ..............
FORT STORY: POST CHAPEL............................................. .............. 2,050 .............. .............. -2,050
NAVY:
DAHLGREN NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER DIVISION:
AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEM SUPPORT FACILITY............................ 6,600 6,600 6,600 .............. ..............
ELECTRICAL WARFARE INTEGRATED FACILITY ADDITION................. 7,320 7,320 7,320 .............. ..............
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE TRNG FACILITY ADDITION............... 6,560 6,560 6,560 .............. ..............
DAM NECK FLEET COMBAT TRAINING CENTER (ATLANTIC): BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS RENOVATION................................................ 7,000 7,000 7,000 .............. ..............
LITTLE CREEK NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE: LANDING CRAFT AIR CUSHION
COMPLEX (PHASE IV)................................................ 8,685 8,685 8,685 .............. ..............
NORFOLK NAVAL AIR STATION:
AIR OPERATIONS BUILDING......................................... .............. 4,000 .............. .............. -4,000
AIR PASSENGER TERMINAL.......................................... 14,240 14,240 14,240 .............. ..............
NORFOLK NAVAL STATION:
BERTHING PIER................................................... .............. .............. 13,500 +13,500 +13,500
CONSOLIDATED SUPPORT CENTER..................................... 6,100 6,100 6,100 .............. ..............
DEPERMING PIERS................................................. 12,750 12,750 12,750 .............. ..............
NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD:
OILY WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM.................................... 9,500 9,500 9,500 .............. ..............
WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENTS......................................... .............. 19,910 .............. .............. -19,910
OCEANA NAVAL AIR STATION:
AIR OPERATIONS CONTROL TOWER.................................... 2,100 2,100 2,100 .............. ..............
AIRCRAFT ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE (PHASE I)......................... .............. 6,000 .............. .............. -6,000
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS REPLACEMENT.......................... 20,900 20,900 20,900 .............. ..............
JET ENGINE TEST CELL............................................ 5,000 5,000 5,000 .............. ..............
YORKTOWN NAVAL WEAPONS STATION:
GYMNASIUM....................................................... 5,400 5,400 5,400 .............. ..............
TOMAHAWK MAGAZINE............................................... .............. 3,290 .............. .............. -3,290
TORPEDO MAGAZINE................................................ 5,857 5,857 5,857 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE: LANGLEY AFB: FIRE STATION (PHASE II)......................... 4,031 4,031 4,031 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CINCLANTFLT NORFOLK: DFAS--REGIONAL FINANCE CENTER.................. 12,800 12,800 12,800 .............. ..............
DEF FUEL SUPPORT POINT CRANEY ISLAND: REPLACE FUEL TANKAGE.......... 22,100 22,100 22,100 .............. ..............
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT (NORFOLK): REPLACE GENERAL PURPOSE
WAREHOUSE.......................................................... 16,656 16,656 16,656 .............. ..............
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER (RICHMOND):
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER........................................ 2,100 2,100 2,100 .............. ..............
GAS CYLINDER FACILITY........................................... 3,100 3,100 3,100 .............. ..............
FT LEE: DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY HEADQUARTERS ADDITION............. 9,300 9,300 9,300 .............. ..............
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL HOSPITAL: HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE IX).......... .............. .............. 34,600 +34,600 +34,600
QUANTICO MARINE CORPS BASE: MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT....... 19,000 19,000 19,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA................................................... 223,799 255,949 268,799 +45,000 +12,850

WASHINGTON

ARMY:
FORT LEWIS:
TANK TRAIL EROSION MITIGATION (YAKIMA) (PHASE III).............. 2,000 2,000 2,000 .............. ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.................................. 31,000 31,000 31,000 .............. ..............
NAVY:
BREMERTON PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD: CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER...... 4,400 4,400 4,400 .............. ..............
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR STATION: ELECTRONIC WARFARE TRAINING
FACILITY........................................................... 1,100 1,100 1,100 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
FAIRCHILD AFB:
ADD/ALT FIRE STATION............................................ .............. .............. 4,750 +4,750 +4,750
EDUCATION CENTER LIBRARY........................................ .............. .............. 8,200 +8,200 +8,200
KC-135 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT.................. 7,366 7,366 7,366 .............. ..............
SURVIVAL TRAING ACADEMY SUPPORT FACILITY (PH I)................. .............. .............. 3,700 +3,700 +3,700
MCCHORD AFB:
C-17:
ALTER MAINTENANCE HANGARS................................... 6,470 6,470 6,470 .............. ..............
ENGINE TEST CELL FACILITY................................... 3,185 .............. .............. -3,185 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
EVERETT NAVAL STATION: MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC........................ 7,500 7,500 7,500 .............. ..............
FORT LEWIS: TROOP MEDICAL CLINIC.................................... .............. 5,000 5,000 +5,000 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FAIRCHILD AFB: UPGRADE KC-135 FLIGHTLINE FACILITIES. .............. 9,500 .............. .............. -9,500
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MCCHORD AFB: CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY.. .............. 3,100 .............. .............. -3,100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON................................................. 63,021 77,436 81,486 +18,465 +4,050

WEST VIRGINA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP DAWSON: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER........... .............. .............. 6,828 +6,828 +6,828

WISCONSIN

DEFENSE-WIDE: TRUAX FIELD (MADISON): JET FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX........... 4,500 4,500 4,500 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HAYWARD: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP (OMS)..... 2,900 2,900 2,900 .............. ..............
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT MCCOY (SPARTA):
ARMY RESERVE READINESS TRAINING CENTER (PHASE II)............... 14,856 14,856 14,856 .............. ..............
COMBAT PISTOL RANGE............................................. 1,500 1,500 1,500 .............. ..............
ELECTRIC POWER TO RANGES........................................ 2,611 2,611 2,611 .............. ..............
MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE...................................... 1,973 1,973 1,973 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MITCHELL ARS: AERIAL PORT TRAINING FACILITY.......... .............. .............. 4,200 +4,200 +4,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WISCONSIN.................................................. 28,340 28,340 32,540 +4,200 +4,200

WYOMING

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP GUERNSEY: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP/CSMS/OMT/
VTES................................................................... .............. .............. 13,891 +13,891 +13,891

CONUS CLASSIFIED

ARMY: CLASSIFIED LOCATIONS: CLASSIFIED PROJECT.......................... 6,500 6,500 6,500 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
CLASSIFIED LOCATION:
SPECIAL TACTICAL UNIT DETACHMENT FACILITY....................... 1,875 1,875 1,875 .............. ..............
VISITOR CONTROL CENTER AND SECURITY UPGRADE..................... 4,300 4,300 4,300 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONUS CLASSIFIED....................................... 12,675 12,675 12,675 .............. ..............

BAHRAIN ISLAND

NAVY:
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT UNIT (SOUTHWEST ASIA):
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS...................................... 25,000 25,000 25,000 .............. ..............
UTILITIES UPGRADE............................................... 5,100 5,100 5,100 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BAHRAIN ISLAND......................................... 30,100 30,100 30,100 .............. ..............

GERMANY

ARMY:
KATTERBACH KASERNE (ANSBACH): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL........ 22,000 22,000 22,000 .............. ..............
TOMPKINS BARRACKS (HEIDELBERG): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL...... 8,800 8,800 8,800 .............. ..............
RHINE ORDNANCE BARRACKS (KAISERSLAUTERN): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL............................................................ 6,000 6,000 6,000 .............. ..............
TAYLOR BARRACKS (MANNHEIM): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.......... 6,200 6,200 .............. -6,200 -6,200
AIR FORCE: SPANGDAHLEM AB: DORMITORIES.................................. 18,500 18,500 .............. -18,500 -18,500
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY.................................................... 61,500 61,500 36,800 -24,700 -24,700

GUAM

NAVY: NAVAL COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS AREA MASTER STATION (WESTERN
PACIFIC): FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS.......................... 4,050 4,050 4,050 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: ANDERSEN AFB: REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE....................... 16,000 16,000 16,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM....................................................... 20,050 20,050 20,050 .............. ..............

ITALY

NAVY:
NAPLES NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: AIR PASSENGER TERMINAL............... 8,200 8,200 8,200 .............. ..............
SIGONELLA NAVAL AIR STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS REPLACEMENT. 21,440 21,440 21,440 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE:
AVIANO AB:
ROADS/UTILITIES SYSTEM.......................................... 7,320 7,320 7,320 .............. ..............
WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM AREAS................................ 7,900 7,900 7,900 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY.................................................. 44,860 44,860 44,860 .............. ..............

KOREA

ARMY:
CAMP CASEY: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.......................... 5,100 5,100 5,100 .............. ..............
EASTERN CORRIDOR (CAMP CASTLE): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL...... 8,400 8,400 8,400 .............. ..............
CAMP HUMPHREYS: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL...................... 32,000 32,000 32,000 .............. ..............
CAMP RED CLOUD: WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL...................... 23,600 23,600 23,600 .............. ..............
COMBINED FIELD ARMY (CAMP STANLEY): WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL.. 7,000 7,000 .............. -7,000 -7,000
AIR FORCE:
KUNSAN AB:
DORMITORY....................................................... 8,325 8,325 8,325 .............. ..............
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.......................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 .............. ..............
OSAN AB: DORMITORY.................................................. 11,100 11,100 .............. -11,100 -11,100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA...................................................... 97,525 97,525 79,425 -18,100 -18,100

KWAJALEIN

DEFENSE-WIDE: US ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL (USAKA): CONSTRUCT/ALTER THEATER
HIGH ALTITUDE AREA DEFENSE (THAAD) TEST FACILITIES..................... 4,565 4,565 4,565 .............. ..............

PORTUGAL

AIR FORCE: LAJES FIELD (AZORES): WATER TREATMENT PLANT.................. 4,800 4,800 4,800 .............. ..............

PUERTO RICO

NAVY: ROOSEVELT ROADS NAVAL STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS......... 24,100 24,100 24,100 .............. ..............

SPAIN

DEFENSE-WIDE: MORON AIR BASE: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM (PHASE II).... 14,400 14,400 14,400 .............. ..............

UNITED KINGDOM

NAVY: ST MAWGAN JOINT MARITIME FACILITY: RELIGIOUS EDUCATION FACILITY... 2,330 2,330 2,330 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE: ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH: DORMITORIES...................... 11,400 11,400 11,400 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM............................................. 13,730 13,730 13,730 .............. ..............

OVERSEAS CLASSIFIED

AIR FORCE:
CLASSIFIED--OVERSEAS:
SPACED BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS)--RELAY GROUND STATION
(PACIFIC)...................................................... 7,600 7,600 7,600 .............. ..............
SPACED BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS)--RELAY GROUND STATION
(ATLANTIC)..................................................... 6,400 6,400 6,400 .............. ..............
OVERSEAS CLASSIFIED:
INTOWN WAREHOUSE................................................ 1,800 1,800 1,800 .............. ..............
OPERATIONS BUILDING EXPANSION................................... 12,200 12,200 12,200 .............. ..............
WAR READINESS MATERIAL WAREHOUSE................................ 2,000 2,000 .............. -2,000 -2,000
WAR READINESS MATERIAL COMMUNICATIONS MAINTENANCE SHOP/
MANAGEMENT FACILITY............................................ 1,100 1,100 1,100 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OVERSEAS CLASSIFIED.................................. 31,100 31,100 29,100 -2,000 -2,000

NATO

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM........................................ 176,300 166,300 152,600 -23,700 -13,700

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED

ARMY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
HOST NATION SUPPORT............................................. 20,000 20,000 20,000 .............. ..............
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 43,477 51,577 57,646 +14,169 +6,069
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 6,000 6,000 11,900 +5,900 +5,900
NAVY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 42,489 46,659 46,489 +4,000 -170
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 9,960 9,960 13,860 +3,900 +3,900
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 40,880 45,880 48,880 +8,000 +3,000
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 8,545 8,545 10,545 +2,000 +2,000
REDUCTION FOR PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS................................ -23,858 .............. .............. +23,858 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
ENERGY CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM......................... 25,000 25,000 25,000 .............. ..............
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION........................................ 9,844 9,844 4,000 -5,844 -5,844
GENERAL REDUCTION (NSA)......................................... .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
PLANNING AND DESIGN:
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION...................... 540 540 540 .............. ..............
CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM........................... 9,200 9,200 9,200 .............. ..............
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE...................... 1,400 1,400 1,400 .............. ..............
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES.................................... 30,300 9,000 19,600 -10,700 +10,600
DEFENSE MEDICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY............................ 10,500 10,500 18,000 +7,500 +7,500
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.................................. 3,710 3,710 3,710 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN............................. 55,650 34,350 52,450 -3,200 +18,100
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION:
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.................................. 4,100 4,100 4,100 .............. ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION...................... 1,965 1,965 1,965 .............. ..............
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES.................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 .............. ..............
DEFENSE MEDICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY............................ 7,958 7,958 7,958 .............. ..............
DOD DEPENDENT SCHOOLS....................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 .............. ..............
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF....................................... 6,234 6,234 6,234 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................. 25,257 25,257 25,257 .............. ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 2,800 2,800 33,000 +30,200 +30,200
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 6,698 6,698 40,900 +34,202 +34,202
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 7,029 8,029 15,650 +8,621 +7,621
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 4,231 4,231 8,800 +4,569 +4,569
ARMY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 5,100 5,783 7,100 +2,000 +1,317
REDUCTION FOR PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS................................ -7,900 .............. .............. +7,900 ..............
NAVAL RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 2,527 3,027 3,027 +500 ..............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 650 650 650 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN............................................. 1,516 2,116 2,116 +600 ..............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.................................. 4,464 4,464 4,464 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED.................................. 290,359 320,870 431,734 +141,375 +110,864

WORLDWIDE VARIOUS

ARMY: OVERSEAS VARIOUS LOCATIONS: STRATEGIC LOGISTICAL PREPOSITIONING
COMPLEX (PHASE III).................................................... 37,000 37,000 37,000 .............. ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: VARIOUS LOCATIONS: POLLUTION ABATEMENT FACILITIES
(CONFORMING STOR- AGE)................................................ 11,275 11,275 11,275 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE VARIOUS.......................................... 48,275 48,275 48,275 .............. ..............

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

ALASKA:.................................................................
FORT RICHARDSON (52 UNITS).......................................... .............. .............. 9,600 +9,600 +9,600
FORT WAINWRIGHT (32 UNITS).......................................... .............. .............. 8,300 +8,300 +8,300
ARIZONA: FORT HUACHUCA (55 UNITS)....................................... .............. 8,000 .............. .............. -8,000
FLORIDA: MIAMI (US SOUTHERN COMMAND HEADQUARTERS) (8 UNITS)............. 2,300 .............. .............. -2,300 ..............
HAWAII: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS (132 UNITS).................................. 26,600 26,600 26,600 .............. ..............
KENTUCKY: FORT CAMPBELL (86 UNITS)...................................... .............. .............. 8,500 +8,500 +8,500
MARYLAND: FORT MEADE (56 UNITS)......................................... 7,900 7,900 7,900 .............. ..............
NEW JERSEY: PICATINNY ARSENAL (35 UNITS)................................ .............. 7,300 .............. .............. -7,300
NORTH CAROLINA:
FORT BRAGG (142 UNITS).............................................. 16,800 16,800 16,800 .............. ..............
FORT BRAGG (32 UNITS)............................................... 3,350 3,350 3,350 .............. ..............
TEXAS:
FORT BLISS (91 UNITS)............................................... 12,900 12,900 12,900 .............. ..............
FORT HOOD (130 UNITS)............................................... 18,800 18,800 18,800 .............. ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS............................................... 44,800 90,931 44,800 .............. -46,131
PLANNING AND DESIGN..................................................... 9,550 9,550 9,550 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION............................................ 143,000 202,131 167,100 +24,100 -35,031
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT................................................. 47,404 47,404 47,404 .............. ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.................................................. 80,089 80,089 80,089 .............. ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT............................................... 327 327 327 .............. ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.................................................... 52,936 52,936 52,936 .............. ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT................................................... 265,732 265,732 265,732 .............. ..............
LEASING............................................................. 234,053 234,053 235,053 +1,000 +1,000
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY........................................ 468,393 468,393 468,393 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............................... 1,148,934 1,148,934 1,149,934 +1,000 +1,000
INTEREST PAYMENTS................................................... 3 3 3 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY....................................... 1,291,937 1,351,068 1,317,037 +25,100 -34,031
===============================================================================

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY

CALIFORNIA:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE (171 UNITS)........................ 22,518 22,518 22,518 .............. ..............
LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION (128 UNITS)............................... 23,226 23,226 23,226 .............. ..............
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION (MIRAMAR) (166 UNITS)...................... 28,881 28,881 28,881 .............. ..............
SAN DIEGO NAVAL COMPLEX (94 UNITS).................................. .............. 13,500 .............. .............. -13,500
TWENTYNINE PALMS MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT CENTER (132 UNITS).. 23,891 23,891 23,891 .............. ..............
HAWAII: PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX (84 UNITS)........................... .............. 17,900 17,900 +17,900 ..............
LOUISIANA: NEW ORLEANS NAVAL COMPLEX (100 UNITS)........................ .............. 11,930 .............. .............. -11,930
NORTH CAROLINA: CAMP LEJEUNE (37 UNITS)................................. .............. .............. 2,863 +2,863 +2,863
TEXAS:
CORPUS CHRISTI NAS (57 UNITS)....................................... .............. .............. 6,470 +6,470 +6,470
KINGSVILLE/CORPUS CHRISTI NAVAL COMPLEX (212 UNITS)................. .............. 22,250 .............. .............. -22,250
WASHINGTON:
BANGOR NAVAL COMPLEX (118 UNITS).................................... .............. 15,700 15,700 +15,700 ..............
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS (198 UNITS)...................................... .............. .............. 32,290 +32,290 +32,290
WORLDWIDE VARIOUS: REDUCTION FOR PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS..................... -8,463 .............. .............. +8,463 ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS............................................... 173,780 214,282 173,780 .............. -40,502
PLANNING AND DESIGN..................................................... 15,100 15,100 15,100 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION............................................ 278,933 409,178 362,619 +83,686 -46,559
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT................................................. 34,211 34,211 34,211 .............. ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.................................................. 87,731 87,731 87,731 .............. ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT............................................... 806 806 806 .............. ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.................................................... 66,968 66,968 66,968 .............. ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT................................................... 199,776 199,776 199,776 .............. ..............
LEASING............................................................. 124,507 124,507 124,507 .............. ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY........................................ 462,427 462,427 462,427 .............. ..............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS......................................... 78 78 78 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............................... 976,504 976,504 976,504 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY....................................... 1,255,437 1,385,682 1,339,123 +83,686 -46,559
===============================================================================
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FIRCE

ARIZONA: DAVIS-MOTHAN AFB (70 UNITS).................................... .............. 9,800 .............. .............. -9,800
CALIFORNIA:
EDWARDS AFB (51 UNITS).............................................. 8,500 8,500 8,500 .............. ..............
EDWARDS AFB (44 UNITS).............................................. .............. 8,300 .............. .............. -8,300
TRAVIS AFB (70 UNITS)............................................... 9,714 9,714 9,714 .............. ..............
VANDENBERG AFB (108 UNITS).......................................... 17,100 17,100 17,100 .............. ..............
DELAWARE: DOVER AFB (HOUSING MAINTENANCE FACILITY)...................... 831 831 831 .............. ..............
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: BOLLING AFB (46 UNITS)............................ 5,100 5,100 5,100 .............. ..............
FLORIDA:
MACDILL AFB (58 UNITS).............................................. 10,000 10,000 10,000 .............. ..............
TYNDALL AFB (32 UNITS).............................................. 4,200 4,200 4,200 .............. ..............
GEORGIA:
ROBINS AFB (60 UNITS)............................................... 6,800 6,800 6,800 .............. ..............
ROBINS AFB (46 UNITS)............................................... .............. .............. 5,200 +5,200 +5,200
IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB (60 UNITS)..................................... 11,032 11,032 11,032 .............. ..............
KANSAS:
MCCONNELL AFB (19 UNITS)............................................ 2,951 2,951 2,951 .............. ..............
MCCONNELL AFB (FAMILY HOUSING MANAGEMENT OFFICE).................... .............. 581 .............. .............. -581
MISSISSIPPI:
COLUMBUS AFB (50 UNITS)............................................. 6,200 6,200 6,200 .............. ..............
KEESLER AFB (40 UNITS).............................................. 5,000 5,000 5,000 .............. ..............
MONTANA:
MALMSTROM AFB (28 UNITS)............................................ 4,842 4,842 4,842 .............. ..............
MALMSTROM AFB (PHASE II) (92 UNITS)................................. .............. .............. 16,605 +16,605 +16,605
NEW MEXICO: KIRTLAND AFB (180 UNITS).................................... 20,900 20,900 20,900 .............. ..............
NORTH DAKOTA: GRAND FORKS AFB (42 UNITS)................................ 7,936 7,936 7,936 .............. ..............
SOUTH CAROLINA: CHARLESTON AFB.......................................... .............. .............. 14,300 +14,300 +14,300
TEXAS:
DYESS AFB (70 UNITS)................................................ 10,503 10,503 10,503 .............. ..............
GOODFELLOW AFB (3 UNITS)............................................ 500 500 500 .............. ..............
LACKLAND AFB (50 UNITS)............................................. .............. 7,400 7,400 +7,400 ..............
SHEPPARD AFB (40 UNITS)............................................. .............. 7,400 .............. .............. -7,400
WYOMING: F E WARREN AFB (52 UNITS)...................................... 6,853 6,853 6,853 .............. ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS............................................... 102,195 156,995 102,195 .............. -54,800
PLANNING AND DESIGN..................................................... 11,971 11,971 11,971 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION............................................ 253,128 341,409 296,633 +43,505 -44,776
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT................................................. 36,427 36,427 36,427 .............. ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.................................................. 48,712 48,712 48,712 .............. ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT............................................... 5,661 5,661 5,661 .............. ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.................................................... 35,849 35,849 35,849 .............. ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT................................................... 154,556 154,556 154,556 .............. ..............
LEASING............................................................. 116,716 116,716 116,716 .............. ..............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS......................................... 31 31 31 .............. ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY........................................ 432,282 432,282 432,282 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............................... 830,234 830,234 830,234 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE.................................. 1,083,362 1,171,643 1,126,867 +43,505 -44,776
===============================================================================
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (NSA) (2 UNITS, MENWITH HILL, UNITED KINGDOM). 50 50 50 .............. ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (DLA) (48 UNITS, NEW CUMBERLAND, PA).......... 4,850 4,850 4,850 .............. ..............
PLANNING AND DESIGN (DLA)............................................... 50 50 50 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION............................................ 4,950 4,950 4,950 .............. ..............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA)........................................... 126 126 126 .............. ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA)........................................... 2,328 2,328 2,328 .............. ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA)........................................... 118 118 118 .............. ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA)............................................ 70 70 70 .............. ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA)............................................ 235 235 235 .............. ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA)......................................... 35 35 35 .............. ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA).............................................. 355 355 355 .............. ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA).............................................. 66 66 66 .............. ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA)............................................. 425 425 425 .............. ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA)............................................. 318 318 318 .............. ..............
LEASING (NSA)....................................................... 11,169 11,169 11,169 .............. ..............
LEASING (DIA)....................................................... 16,504 16,504 16,504 .............. ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (NSA).................................. 490 490 490 .............. ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (DLA).................................. 485 485 485 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............................... 32,724 32,724 32,724 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE............................... 37,674 37,674 37,674 .............. ..............
===============================================================================
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART II

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART II........................... 116,754 116,754 116,754 .............. ..............

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART III

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART III.......................... 768,702 768,702 768,702 .............. ..............

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV........................... 1,175,398 1,175,398 1,175,398 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT....................... 2,060,854 2,060,854 2,060,854 .............. ..............
===============================================================================
REVISED ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS (SEC. 125)................................. .............. .............. -31,000 -31,000 -31,000
===============================================================================
GRAND TOTAL....................................................... 8,383,248 9,183,000 9,182,900 +799,652 -100
===============================================================================
RECAPITULATION

ARMY.................................................................... 595,277 721,027 652,046 +56,769 -68,981
NAVY.................................................................... 540,106 685,306 605,756 +65,650 -79,550
AIR FORCE............................................................... 495,782 662,305 662,305 +166,523 ..............
DEFENSE AGENCIES........................................................ 673,633 613,333 690,889 +17,256 +77,556
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD..................................................... 45,098 45,098 234,614 +189,516 +189,516
AIR NATIONAL GUARD...................................................... 60,225 137,275 185,115 +124,890 +47,840
ARMY RESERVE............................................................ 39,112 77,731 96,079 +56,967 +18,348
NAVAL RESERVE........................................................... 13,921 40,561 21,111 +7,190 -19,450
AIR FORCE RESERVE....................................................... 14,530 27,143 31,830 +17,300 +4,687
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION....................................... 2,477,684 3,009,779 3,179,745 +702,061 +169,966
NATO INFRASTRUCTURE..................................................... 176,300 166,300 152,600 -23,700 -13,700
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY.................................................... 1,291,937 1,351,068 1,317,037 +25,100 -34,031
(CONSTRUCTION)...................................................... (143,000) (202,131) (167,100) (+24,100) (-35,031)
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)......................................... (1,148,937) (1,148,937) (1,149,937) (+1,000) (+1,000)
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY.................................................... 1,255,437 1,385,682 1,339,123 +83,686 -46,559
(CONSTRUCTION)...................................................... (278,933) (409,178) (362,619) (+83,686) (-46,559)
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)......................................... (976,504) (976,504) (976,504) .............. ..............
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE............................................... 1,083,362 1,171,643 1,126,867 +43,505 -44,776
(CONSTRUCTION)...................................................... (253,128) (341,409) (296,633) (+43,505) (-44,776)
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)......................................... (830,234) (830,234) (830,234) .............. ..............
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE............................................ 37,674 37,674 37,674 .............. ..............
(CONSTRUCTION)...................................................... (4,950) (4,950) (4,950) .............. ..............
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)......................................... (32,724) (32,724) (32,724) .............. ..............
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT.................................... 2,060,854 2,060,854 2,060,854 .............. ..............
REVISED ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS (SEC. 125)................................. .............. .............. -31,000 -31,000 -31,000
===============================================================================
GRAND TOTAL....................................................... 8,383,248 9,183,000 9,182,900 +799,652 -100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------