[Senate Report 105-213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 410
105th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 105-213
_______________________________________________________________________
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 1999
_______
June 11, 1998.--Ordered to be printed
_______________________________________________________________________
Mr. Burns, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the
following
R E P O R T
[To accompany S. 2160]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2160)
making appropriations for military construction, family
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for
other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.
Total of bill as reported to Senate..................... $8,480,574,000
Amount of 1999 budget estimate.......................... 7,784,074,000
Amount of 1998 appropriations........................... 9,183,248,000
The bill as reported to the Senate:
Over the budget estimate, 1999...................... 696,500,000
Under appropriations for fiscal year 1998........... 702,674,000
C O N T E N T S
----------
Background:
Page
Purpose of the bill.......................................... 3
Comparative statement........................................ 3
Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act........ 7
Committee recommendation......................................... 7
Items of special interest........................................ 8
Military construction, Army...................................... 14
Military construction, Navy...................................... 15
Military construction, Air Force................................. 17
Military construction, Defense-wide.............................. 18
Military construction, Reserve components........................ 20
NATO Security Investment Program................................. 23
Family housing overview.......................................... 24
Family housing, Army............................................. 24
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps............................ 25
Family housing, Air Force........................................ 26
Family housing, Defense-wide..................................... 27
Family housing improvement fund.................................. 27
Homeowners assistance fund....................................... 27
Base closure overview............................................ 27
Base realignment and closure account, part II.................... 30
Base realignment and closure account, part III................... 30
Base realignment and closure account, part IV.................... 30
General provisions............................................... 31
Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 32
Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 32
Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 33
Project listing by location...................................... 34
BACKGROUND
Purpose of the Bill
The Military Construction appropriation bill provides
necessary funding for the planning, design, construction,
alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide,
both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the
construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and
maintenance of military family housing, including payments
against past housing mortgage indebtedness. Certain types of
community impact assistance may be provided, as well as
assistance to members of the military who face loss on the sale
of private residences due to installation realignments and
closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the
NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill
provides funding to implement base closures and realignments
authorized by law.
Comparative Statement
The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$8,480,574,000 for fiscal year 1999 military construction,
family housing, and base closure. The following table displays
the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current
fiscal year, and the President's fiscal year 1999 request.
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (+) or decrease (-) compared
Committee with--
Item 1998 adjusted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------------
1998 adjusted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military construction, Army......................... $714,377,000 $790,876,000 $810,476,000 +$96,099,000 +$19,600,000
Military construction, Navy......................... 683,666,000 468,150,000 559,250,000 -124,416,000 +91,100,000
Military construction, Air Force.................... 701,855,000 454,810,000 627,874,000 -73,981,000 +173,064,000
Military construction, Defense-wide................. 646,342,000 491,675,000 571,485,000 -74,857,000 +79,810,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components...................... 2,746,240,000 2,205,511,000 2,569,085,000 -177,155,000 +363,574,000
===================================================================================================
Military construction, Army National Guard.......... 118,350,000 47,675,000 124,599,000 +6,249,000 +76,924,000
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-174)... 3,700,000 .................. .................. -3,700,000 ..................
Military construction, Air National Guard........... 190,444,000 34,761,000 163,161,000 -27,283,000 +128,400,000
Military construction, Army Reserve................. 74,167,000 71,287,000 114,349,000 +40,182,000 +43,062,000
Military construction, Naval Reserve................ 47,329,000 15,271,000 21,621,000 -25,708,000 +6,350,000
Military construction, Air Force Reserve............ 30,243,000 10,535,000 22,835,000 -7,408,000 +12,300,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components..................... 464,233,000 179,529,000 446,565,000 -17,668,000 +267,036,000
===================================================================================================
Total, Military construction.................. 3,210,473,000 2,385,040,000 3,015,650,000 -194,823,000 +630,610,000
===================================================================================================
NATO Security Investment Program.................... 152,600,000 185,000,000 152,600,000 .................. -32,400,000
===================================================================================================
Family housing, Army:
New construction................................ 101,650,000 70,100,000 70,100,000 -31,550,000 ..................
Construction improvements....................... 86,100,000 28,629,000 49,679,000 -36,421,000 +21,050,000
Planning and design............................. 9,550,000 6,350,000 6,350,000 -3,200,000 ..................
General reduction............................... .................. -1,639,000 -1,639,000 -1,639,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 197,300,000 103,440,000 124,490,000 -72,810,000 +21,050,000
Operation and maintenance....................... 1,140,568,000 1,104,733,000 1,104,733,000 -35,835,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Army................... 1,337,868,000 1,208,173,000 1,229,223,000 -108,645,000 +21,050,000
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
New construction................................ 175,196,000 59,504,000 59,504,000 -115,692,000 ..................
Construction improvements....................... 203,536,000 211,991,000 217,791,000 +14,255,000 +5,800,000
Planning and design............................. 15,100,000 15,618,000 15,618,000 +518,000 ..................
General reduction............................... .................. -6,323,000 -6,323,000 -6,323,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 393,832,000 280,790,000 286,590,000 -107,242,000 +5,800,000
Operation and maintenance....................... 976,504,000 915,293,000 915,293,000 -61,211,000 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-174)... 18,100,000 .................. .................. -18,100,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Navy................... 1,388,436,000 1,196,083,000 1,201,883,000 -186,553,000 +5,800,000
Family housing, Air Force:
New construction................................ 159,943,000 140,499,000 179,199,000 +19,256,000 +38,700,000
Construction improvements....................... 123,795,000 81,778,000 118,018,000 -5,777,000 +36,240,000
Planning and design............................. 11,971,000 11,342,000 11,342,000 -629,000 ..................
General reduction............................... .................. -7,584,000 -11,084,000 -11,084,000 -3,500,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 295,709,000 226,035,000 297,475,000 +1,766,000 +71,440,000
Operation and maintenance....................... 830,234,000 789,995,000 789,995,000 -40,239,000 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-174)... 2,400,000 .................. .................. -2,400,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Air Force.............. 1,128,343,000 1,016,030,000 1,087,470,000 -40,873,000 +71,440,000
Family housing, Defense-wide:
Construction improvements....................... 4,900,000 345,000 345,000 -4,555,000 ..................
Planning and design............................. 50,000 .................. .................. -50,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 4,950,000 345,000 345,000 -4,605,000 ..................
Operation and maintenance....................... 32,724,000 36,899,000 36,899,000 +4,175,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Defense-wide........... 37,674,000 37,244,000 37,244,000 -430,000 ..................
===================================================================================================
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement
Fund............................................... .................. 7,000,000 7,000,000 +7,000,000 ..................
Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense................. .................. 12,800,000 12,800,000 +12,800,000 ..................
===================================================================================================
Total, Family housing......................... 3,892,321,000 3,477,330,000 3,575,620,000 -316,701,000 +98,290,000
New construction.......................... (436,789,000) (270,103,000) (308,803,000) (-127,986,000) (+38,700,000)
Construction improvements................. (418,331,000) (322,743,000) (385,833,000) (-32,498,000) (+63,090,000)
Planning and design....................... (36,671,000) (33,310,000) (33,310,000) (-3,361,000) ..................
General reduction......................... .................. (-15,546,000) (-19,046,000) (-19,046,000) (-3,500,000)
Operation and maintenance................. (2,980,030,000) (2,846,920,000) (2,846,920,000) (-133,110,000) ..................
Family Housing Improvement Fund........... .................. (7,000,000) (7,000,000) (+7,000,000) ..................
Homeowners Assistance Fund................ .................. (12,800,000) (12,800,000) (+12,800,000) ..................
Emergency appropriations.................. (20,500,000) .................. .................. (-20,500,000) ..................
===================================================================================================
Base realignment and closure accounts:
Part II......................................... 116,754,000 .................. .................. -116,754,000 ..................
Part III........................................ 768,702,000 433,464,000 433,464,000 -335,238,000 ..................
Part IV......................................... 1,175,398,000 1,297,240,000 1,297,240,000 +121,842,000 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 105-174)... 1,020,000 .................. .................. -1,020,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Base realignment and closure accounts
(net)........................................ 2,061,874,000 1,730,704,000 1,730,704,000 -331,170,000 ..................
===================================================================================================
Paine Field authority (sec. 126).................... .................. 6,000,000 6,000,000 +6,000,000 ..................
Revised Economic Assumption (sec. 125).............. -108,800,000 .................. .................. +108,800,000 ..................
===================================================================================================
Grand total:
New budget (obligational) authority....... 9,208,468,000 7,784,074,000 8,480,574,000 -727,894,000 +696,500,000
Appropriations........................ (9,183,248,000) (7,784,074,000) (8,480,574,000) (-702,674,000) (+696,500,000)
Emergency appropriations.............. (25,220,000) .................. .................. (-25,220,000) ..................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance With Section 308 of the Budget Control Act
Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that the Committee include in
its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels
contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data
are reflected below:
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations
to its subcommittees of amounts for 1999: Subcommittee on
Military Construction:
Defense discretionary................................... 8,484 8,481 9,120 \1\ 9,120
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
1999.................................................... ........... ........... ........... \2\ 2,648
2000.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 2,837
2001.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 1,617
2002.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 822
2003 and future year.................................... ........... ........... ........... 417
Financial assistance to State and local governments for 1999
in bill.................................................... NA ........... NA ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee recommends new fiscal year 1999
appropriations of $8,480,574,000. This is $696,500,000 over the
budget request, and $702,674,000 under the appropriations for
fiscal year 1998. The basis for this recommendation is
contained in the following ``Items of special interest,'' and
under the discussions pertaining to each individual
appropriation. Complete project detail is provided in the
tables at the end of the report.
ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
COMPLIANCE WITH 302(b) ALLOCATION
The Appropriations Committee conformed fully to the budget
resolution for defense spending in its 302(b) allocation. This
allocation divided the budget authority and outlays among the
subcommittees with jurisdiction over discretionary spending. In
this recommended bill, the Appropriations Committee has
remained within the tight constraints of its 302(b) allocation
for military construction.
hearings
The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on
the fiscal year 1999 budget request beginning in March 1998 and
concluding in May 1998. The subcommittee heard testimony from
representatives of the military services and defense agencies
concerning fiscal year 1999 budget priorities and base
realignment and closure issues.
summary of committee recommendations
The budget request for fiscal year 1999 reflects a
reduction of $1,399,174,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal
year 1998. The Committee notes, with great concern, the
continuous under investment by the Department of Defense in
military facilities and infrastructure. This proposed level of
funding does not provide sufficient resources to continue the
Department's efforts to modernize, renovate, and improve aging
defense facilities.
With approximately 22 percent of the Department's military
construction budget request dedicated to the base realignment
and closure accounts, readiness and quality of life for the
Active and Reserve components remain in need of substantial
improvement and dedication of adequate resources. The effects
of sustained and structural inattention by the Department and
the military departments to basic infrastructure are apparent
on nearly every military installation. This will continue to
have long-term implications as facilities continue to age
disproportionately without a sustained level of investment in
maintenance and repair.
The requested funding level reflects a lack of commitment
by the administration to reduce the serious backlog of
readiness, revitalization and quality of life projects. The
Committee urges the Department to develop a comprehensive
funding strategy and plan to address these serious
infrastructure problems.
The Committee recommends an additional $696,500,000 above
the fiscal year 1999 budget request to correct some of these
deficiencies and shortfalls. The total recommended
appropriation for fiscal year 1999 is $8,480,574,000, a
reduction of $702,674,000 from fiscal year 1998 funding.
government performance and results act
The Committee has reviewed the Department of Defense's
performance plan for fiscal year 1999, and evaluated the review
done by the General Accounting Office [GAO] to assess
compliance with the Result's Act. The Committee commends the
assessment and recommendations presented by GAO in this area.
The Department does not clearly articulate how they intend
to modernize, renovate, and improve aging defense
infrastructure into the next century. The plan provides only a
partial picture of intended performance across the DOD. For
example, it does not include any performance measure and
associated target levels to help decisionmakers assess progress
toward DOD's goal to achieve a 21st century infrastructure by
reducing costs while maintaining military capabilities. The
plan notes, however, that total dollars spent on infrastructure
and infrastructure costs as a percentage of total defense
spending are metrics used to gauge success in infrastructure
reduction. DOD could improve its plan by using these metrics as
performance measure and establishing associated target
performance levels.
The Committee encourages the Department to establish
specific performance goals and measures in their fiscal year
2000 submission to Congress that address key indicators
concerning military infrastructure and construction. These
measures should include reduction of real property maintenance
backlogs, improvement of family housing, modernization of
unaccompanied personnel housing, and efforts to address
critical shortfalls of quality of life facilities.
quality of life initiative
The Department of Defense relies on highly trained and
disciplined people as the underlying foundation for its
military strategy. The success of this plan depends on the
Department's ability to recruit, train, and retain quality
people--ultimately, to provide a reasonable quality of life for
them and their families as they serve this Nation.
Quality of life tends to influence a service member's
decision to stay in or leave the service. The Committee
believes that quality of life has a positive impact on
retention, and accordingly is a vital element in ensuring our
military readiness. This year, the Committee is recommending an
additional $200,000,000 for critical quality of life projects
throughout the Department of Defense. These projects include
child care centers, modernization and replacement of barracks,
dining facilities, family housing projects, physical fitness
and recreation centers, health clinics, and family support
centers.
The Committee believes that these facilities are essential
to attracting and maintaining a quality force as well as
supporting service members and their families who live and work
at our military installations. The Committee urges the
Department to ensure that the military departments provide a
sustained level of investment in those facilities which enhance
quality of life.
OVERSEAS CONSTRUCTION
The U.S. military presence permanently stationed overseas
has significantly diminished over the past several years, as
our country has transitioned from a forward-based strategy to
one of forward presence. The nature of our overseas commitments
continues to change, causing uncertainty about the size,
location, and composition of our forces into the next century.
The Committee believes that there is a strong likelihood of
additional force structure reductions in the next few years.
The fiscal year 1999 budget request proposes $1,439,200,000 for
overseas military construction, almost 18 percent of the entire
military construction budget for the Department of Defense.
While these proposed projects support U.S. missions and
forces around the world, the Committee cautions that we must be
prepared for reductions from overseas deployments if force
levels decline further. While recognizing the importance of
providing improvements to those essential quality of life
facilities overseas, the Committee believes the Department
should be particularly conservative in making additional
construction commitments. The Department should consider every
opportunity to lease facilities or share infrastructure with
host nations, where possible. Accordingly, the Committee has
recommended funding only those most essential service
priorities overseas.
environmental compliance projects
The Department has requested $88,147,000 for environmental
compliance project construction during fiscal year 1999. The
Committee recommends funding of $96,767,000 for 15 projects, as
follows:
State/Service/Installation/Project Recommended
Alaska: DFSC: DFSC Elmendorf AFB: Replace hydrant fuel
sys- tem............................................ $19,500,000
Arkansas: Air Force: Little Rock AFB: Upgrade sewage
treatment plant..................................... 1,500,000
California: DMSA: San Diego Naval Hospital: Water
storage tank........................................ 1,350,000
Florida:
DLA:
Def fuel support Point Jax--Anx: Replace fuel
tanks Mayport................................. 11,020,000
Def fuel support Point Jacksonville: Replace
fuel tanks.................................... 11,000,000
Georgia: Navy: Submarine Base Kings Bay: MSF
sedimentation control system........................ 2,550,000
Hawaii:
Navy:
MCB Hawaii: Hazardous material/waste consolid.
fac........................................... 4,570,000
Pearl Harbor Navy Public Works Center: Sewer
outfall extension............................. 22,877,000
Michigan: Air National Guard: Alpena County Regional
Airport: Sanitary sewer lines....................... 3,900,000
Mississippi:
DLA: DFSC Camp Shelby: Replace bulk fuel fac........ 5,300,000
DMSA: Keesler AFB: Bioenvironmental eng fac repl.... 700,000
Oklahoma: DLA: Defense Fuel Support Point--Fort Sill:
Replace fuel storage facility....................... 3,500,000
Washington:
Army: Fort Lewis: Tank trail erosion mitigation--
Yakima............................................ 2,000,000
DMSA: Bangor NSB: Disease Vector Ecology and Control
Center............................................ 5,700,000
Worldwide various: DLA: Various locations: Conforming
storage facilities.................................. 1,300,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................... 96,767,000
The Committee again directs the Department to devote the
maximum amount of resources to actual cleanups and to limit
resources expended on administration, support, studies, and
investigations, to the greatest extent possible.
REPROGRAMMING CRITERIA
The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements more than $2,000,000.
To provide the individual services the flexibility to proceed
with construction contracts without disruption or delay, the
costs associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in
prior years for which construction contracts have not been
completed.
base realignment and closure
The Committee has included $1,730,704,000 for the ``Base
realignment and closure'' account. The Committee has fully
funded the budget request for base closure and realignment.
This includes full funding of the requirements for
environmental cleanup at closing and realigning bases.
The Committee again asks the General Accounting Office to
continue its annual review of the base closure accounts. The
Committee requests GAO's review of and recommendations on the
validity of DOD's proposed budget requests for base closure
activities. In particular, the Committee seeks GAO's assistance
in validating the requests for individual construction
projects, the operation and maintenance costs, and the
environmental cleanup costs associated with base closures and
realignments. The Committee believes the annual GAO review will
continue to give the Congress a better foundation for approving
future requests. This report should be provided to the
congressional defense committees not later than May 15, 1999.
In past years, the Committee directed that any transfer of
funds for construction projects, which deviated from the
approved projects for BRAC IV, should be treated like any other
reprogramming within the military construction appropriation.
The Committee also directs that any transfer of funds for
construction projects, which deviate from the projects
currently approved for BRAC III should be treated like any
other reprogramming within the military construction
appropriation.
single member housing
The Committee continues to recognize the requirement for
better barracks and dormitories for our service members. The
Committee remains concerned, however, that requiring all new
construction to meet the one-plus-one standard is unreasonable,
expensive, and may not be required to solve a critical
retention or morale problem. The Committee feels this
initiative should not be mandated for all services and across
the Department of Defense.
While this initiative promises to improve quality of life,
it does not make sense in today's constrained fiscal
environment. It will cost approximately $14,300,000,000 to
build barracks to this new standard over the next 20 years.
With the precipitous decline in military construction spending,
the issue becomes how the Department allocates scarce resources
between other meritorious requirements, such as family housing
and rebuilding aging infrastructure.
The majority of the occupants of these rooms will be the
most junior enlisted members of our military. There are other
ways to improve quality of life, retention and morale beyond
providing every unaccompanied service member a private room.
More importantly, putting an 18-year-old man or woman in a room
alone detracts from promoting unit cohesiveness and team
building. When young service members retire to their private
rooms, opportunities for interaction and mentoring are lost. It
is well documented that the more time members of a unit
associate together, the more cohesive and effective their team
becomes, particularly in combat.
However, the Committee strongly supports the requirement
for junior noncommissioned officers to have private rooms.
Their right to privacy should be a factor in determining the
types and number of facilities needed in each location.
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to report to
the congressional defense committees on the overall Department
analysis that supports the requirement to expend the funds
necessary to convert barracks to the new standard, timetable to
do so, associated costs and what morale, retention and
readiness problems will be solved by building and replacing all
barracks to this standard. The assessment should be provided no
later than March 15, 1999.
The Committee recommends $708,442,000 for 46 barracks
construction projects in fiscal year 1999, an increase of
$141,720,000 over the budget request. The projects are as
follows:
BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/service/installation/
project Request Change Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Air Force: Maxwell AFB:
OTS student dormitories......... 12,765 ........... 12,765
Alaska: Army: Fort Wainwright:
Whole barracks renewal.......... ........... +19,500 19,500
Arizona: Navy: Yuma MCAS:
Bachelor enlisted quarters...... 11,010 ........... 11,010
California:
Navy:
Camp Pendleton MCB:
Bachelor enlisted
quarters................ 12,400 ........... 12,400
Camp Pendleton MCB:
Bachelor enlisted
quarters................ 15,840 ........... 15,840
Miramar CA MCAS: Bachelor
enlisted quarters....... 29,570 ........... 29,570
Naval Facility San
Clemente: Bachelor
enlisted quarters....... 8,350 ........... 8,350
Florida: Air Force: Eglin AFB:
Dormitory....................... 7,866 ........... 7,866
Georgia:
Army: Fort Benning: Whole
barracks complex renewal.... 28,600 ........... 28,600
Navy: NAS Atlanta: BEQ
modernization............... ........... +2,250 2,250
Hawaii:
Army: Schofield barracks:
Whole barracks complex
renewal..................... 47,500 ........... 47,500
Navy:
Kaneohe Bay MCAS:
Bachelor enlisted
quarters................ 27,410 ........... 27,410
MCB Hawaii: Bachelor
enlisted quarters....... ........... +19,000 19,000
NSB Pearl Harbor: BEQ
modernization........... 8,060 ........... 8,060
Idaho: Air Force: Mountain Home
AFB: Dormitory.................. 8,897 ........... 8,897
Kansas: Army: Fort Riley: Whole
barracks complex renewal phase
II.............................. ........... +16,500 16,500
Kentucky:
Army:
Fort Campbell: Whole
barracks complex renewal 41,000 ........... 41,000
Fort Campbell: Whole
barracks complex renewal
phase II................ ........... +15,500 15,500
Maine: NAS Brunswick: Bachelor
enlisted quarters............... ........... +15,220 15,220
Maryland: Army: Fort Detrick:
Whole barracks complex renewal
phase II........................ ........... +7,100 7,100
Mississippi:
Air Force:
Columbus AFB: Bachelor
officers quarters....... ........... +5,700 5,700
Keesler AFB: Student
dormitories............. 29,770 ........... 29,770
Navy: Gulfport Naval
Construction Bn Ctr: BEQ
modernization............... 10,670 ........... 10,670
Montana: Air Force: Malmstrom
AFB: Replace dormitory.......... ........... +7,900 7,900
Nevada: Air Force: Nellis AFB:
Dormitory....................... 6,378 ........... 6,378
North Carolina:
Army: Fort Bragg: Whole
barracks complex renewal.... 47,000 ........... 47,000
Navy: Camp Lejeune MCB:
Bachelor enlisted quarters.. ........... +15,700 15,700
Oklahoma:
Air Force: Tinker AFB:
Dormitory................... 9,100 ........... 9,100
Army: Fort Sill: Whole
barracks complex renewal.... 20,500 ........... 20,500
Texas:
Air Force:
Goodfellow AFB: Student
dormitory............... ........... +7,300 7,300
Lackland AFB: Dormitory.. 6,800 ........... 6,800
Army: Fort Sam Houston: Whole
barracks complex renewal.... 21,800 ........... 21,800
Virginia:
Army:
Fort Eustis: Whole
barracks complex renewal 36,531 ........... 36,531
Fort Meyer: Whole
barracks complex renewal ........... +6,200 6,200
Wyoming: Air Force: F.E. Warren
AFB: Alter dormitories.......... ........... +3,850 3,850
Germany:
Army: Schweinfurt: Whole
barracks complex renewal.... 18,000 ........... 18,000
Air Force: Spangdahlem AB:
Dormitory................... 9,501 ........... 9,501
Greece: Navy: Souda Bay Crete
Naval support activity: Bachelor
enlisted quarters............... 5,260 ........... 5,260
Korea:
Army:
Camp Casey: Whole
barracks complex renewal 13,400 ........... 13,400
Camp Castle: Whole
barracks complex renewal 18,226 ........... 18,226
Camp Humphreys: Whole
barracks complex renewal 8,500 ........... 8,500
Camp Stanley: Whole
barracks complex renewal 5,800 ........... 5,800
Air Force:
Kunsan AB: Dormitory..... 5,958 ........... 5,958
Osan AB: Dormitory....... 7,496 ........... 7,496
United Kingdom:
Air Force:
RAF Lakenheath:
Dormitories............. 15,838 ........... 15,838
RAF Mildenhall:
Dormitories............. 10,926 ........... 10,926
--------------------------------------
Totals................. 566,722 +141,720 708,442
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Construction, Army
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $714,377,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 790,876,000
Committee recommendation................................ 810,476,000
The Committee recommends $810,476,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 1999. This is an increase of $19,600,000 from the
budget request for fiscal year 1999. (See State tables at the
end of the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 1999, as
practical:
Road improvement, Pohakuloa training area, Hawaii.--Of the
$46,819,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $2,200,000 be made available for the design
of the Saddle Road improvement at the Pohakuloa training area,
Hawaii.
Fort Hunter Liggett, CA.--The Committee is aware that the
Army is currently developing plans for the realignment of Fort
Hunter Liggett, CA, as mandated by the 1995 Defense Base
Realignment and Closure [BRAC] Commission. The Commission's
findings state in part: ``The realignment of this installation
ends the Active component presence while preserving the U.S.
Army Reserve Command garrison. The Army will license the
training facility and training area to the California National
Guard as part of the realignment.''
The Committee has learned that the Secretary of the Army's
plan for the realignment of Fort Hunter Liggett does not
include a requirement to grant a real estate license to the
California National Guard. Although the Committee does not
intend to intervene in the base closure process, the Committee
directs a report to the congressional defense committees
detailing the Army's intent regarding the granting of a real
estate license to the California National Guard.
Sabre Heliport, Fort Campbell, KY.--The Committee
recognizes the critical importance of the Sabre Heliport to
military operations at Fort Campbell, to include both the 101st
Airborne Division (Assault) and the special operations
community. However, this facility currently handles
approximately 76,800 operations each year, when it was
originally designed to support only several thousand annually.
The Committee understands that this heliport needs
essential renovations in order to operate both safely and
efficiently. The U.S. Army Aeronautical Services Agency
[USAASA] has issued a temporary waiver that allows the facility
to continue normal operations until April 2001. However, these
deficiencies decrease operational efficiency, increase the risk
of accidents, and limit the Army's ability to facilitate
necessary training and support to assigned aircraft.
The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to report
to the congressional defense committees not later than January
15, 1999, on their plan and timetable to make the necessary
airfield improvements. The Committee urges the Department to
assess the viability of reprogramming funds in order to
accomplish this work. These renovations should ensure that the
heliport continues to meet its mission requirements, complies
with the instrument flight rules [IFR], and no longer requires
a USAASA waiver.
Coal car preheat facility, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of the
$15,000,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,500,000 be made available to build a coal car preheat
facility at Fort Wainwright, AK.
North Fort athletic complex, Fort Lewis, WA.--Of the
$46,819,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $456,000 be made available for the design of
the North Fort athletic complex at Fort Lewis, WA.
Ammunition surveillance facility, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of
the $46,819,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $320,000 be made available for the design of
an ammunition surveillance facility at Fort Wainwright, AK.
Chicago Military Academy, Chicago, IL.--The Committee urges
the Department of the Army to assess the feasibility of
converting the Eighth Regiment Armory in Chicago, IL, into a
Chicago Military Academy for Junior Reserve Officer Training
Corps.
Military Construction, Navy
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $683,666,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 468,150,000
Committee recommendation................................ 559,250,000
The Committee recommends $559,250,000 for Navy and Marine
Corps military construction for fiscal year 1999. This amount
is an increase of $91,100,000 from the fiscal year 1999 budget
request. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early as fiscal year 1999, as
practical:
Naval Station, Annapolis, MD.--The Committee has provided
$4,200,000 for the design and demolition of the Navy radio
transmitting facility [NRTF] towers at the Naval Station,
Annapolis. The Committee encourages the Navy to maintain this
parcel of land as a permanent wildlife refuge with managed
public access. Additionally, the Committee directs the Navy to
report to the congressional defense committees the status of
this demolition effort and intended use of the land not later
than October 15, 1998.
Former Naval Ordinance Station, Louisville, KY.--The
Committee is concerned with the Navy's unwillingness to enter
into negotiations with the Louisville Jefferson County
Redevelopment Authority [LJCRA] regarding a long-term lease
agreement regarding the former Louisville Naval Ordinance
Station. Section 2833 of the Fiscal Year 1996 Defense
Authorization Act specifically grants the services the
authority to enter into longer term interim leases concerning
BRAC properties. In June 1996, the Principal Assistant Deputy
Under Secretary of Defense (Industrial Affairs and
Installations) urged each of the services ``to take full
advantage of this opportunity.''
As a result of the Navy's reluctance to do so, the Greater
Louisville Technology Park facility has been unable to maximize
economic redevelopment and thus lower the Navy's overhead
costs. The Committee strongly encourages the Department of the
Navy to begin negotiations with the LJCRA immediately. A 25-
year lease effort will allow the facility to successfully
recruit additional tenants, benefiting the local community as
well as the Navy. The Committee directs the Navy to report to
the congressional defense committees on the status of these
negotiations not later than October 15, 1998.
The Committee also understands that there are a number of
unresolved environmental conditions associated with the former
Naval Ordinance Station in Louisville which are delaying the
transition from government to private operations. The Committee
directs the Department of the Navy to review this matter and
report to the congressional defense committees by October 30,
1998, on the results of this assessment.
Aircraft platform interface facility, Lakehurst Naval Air
Warfare Center, New Jersey.--Of the $62,146,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Military construction, Navy''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,650,000 be
made available for the design of an aircraft platform interface
facility at Lakehurst Naval Air Warfare Center, New Jersey.
Fitness facility, NAVSUBASE, Bangor, WA.--Of the
$10,100,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,117,000 be provided for the construction of a fitness
facility at the lower base, NAVSUBASE, Bangor, WA.
Berthing pier replacement, Earle NWS, NJ.--Of the
$62,146,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Navy'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design
of a berthing pier replacement at Earle NWS, NJ.
Water conservation issues, Naval Air Station Fallon, NV.--
The Committee directs the Navy, to the maximum extent
practicable, to replace direct surface deliveries of water with
drain water and treated wastewater to irrigate the lands owned
by the United States associated with the Naval Air Station at
Fallon, NV. Of the $62,146,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Military construction, Navy'' account, the
Committee directs $1,150,000 be made available for treatment
design for these alternative sources of water. Further, upon
completion of the existing agricultural out leases on this
land, the Navy is encouraged to return the irrigated greenbelt
lands to their previous ecologically appropriate dryland
condition.
The Committee understands the Navy is considering building
a golf course on the Naval Air Station Fallon. The Committee
notes this intended land use appears inconsistent with the
intent of Public Law 101-618, section 206(c). No funds
appropriated by this act, and no actions otherwise should be
taken by the Navy to build a golf course in the vicinity of
U.S. Naval Station, Fallon, NV, without the further specific
approval of the Congress.
Naval security group activity, Sugar Grove, WV.--The
Committee understands there is a shortage of military family
housing and quality of life facilities at the naval security
group activity located at Sugar Grove, WV. The Committee
directs the Department of the Navy to report to the
congressional defense committees not later than January 15,
1999, on plans to reduce the housing deficit, upgrade existing
barracks and housing, as well as improve quality of life
facilities at this installation.
Military Construction, Air Force
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $701,855,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 454,810,000
Committee recommendation................................ 627,874,000
The Committee recommends $627,874,000 for the Air Force in
fiscal year 1999. This is an increase of $173,064,000 to the
fiscal year 1999 budget request. (See State table at the end of
the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 1999, as
practical:
Rhein Main Air Base.--The Committee understands that the
Air Force intends to close Rhein Mein Air Base and transition
the mission to Ramstein and Spangdahlem Air Bases. The Air
Force plans to significantly improve and expand existing
infrastructure and capabilities at these bases as part of this
relocation proposal. The Committee also understands that the
Air Force will receive payment-in-kind [PIK] for new facilities
at Ramstein Air Base and Spangdahlem Air Base in exchange for
existing U.S. infrastructure that will be returned to the
Government of Germany. Accordingly, the Committee has
disapproved the request for a mission-related military
construction project at Spangdahlem Air Base.
Airfield repair, Seymour Johnson AFB, NC.--Of the
$39,522,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $612,000 be made available for the
design of airfield repairs at Seymour Johnson AFB, NC.
Apron extension, Grand Forks AFB, ND.--Of the $39,522,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $820,000 be made available for the design of an
apron extension at Grand Forks AFB, ND.
Airfield repairs, Galena Air Station, AK.--Of the
$39,522,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $900,000 be made available for the
design of airfield repairs at Galena Air Station, AK.
Gibson Gate replacement, Kirtland AFB, NM.--Of the
$10,135,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,500,000 be made available to replace the Gibson Gate at
Kirtland AFB, NM.
Davis Highway intersection, Elmendorf AFB, AK.--Of the
$39,522,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $285,000 be made available for the
design of the Davis Highway intersection, Elmendorf AFB, AK.
Visitors quarters, Dover AFB, DE.--Of the $39,522,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design of a
visitors quarters at Dover AFB, DE.
Military Construction, Defense-wide
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $646,342,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 491,675,000
Committee recommendation................................ 571,485,000
The Committee recommends $571,485,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-wide'' account. The amount
recommended is an increase of $79,810,000 from the fiscal year
1999 budget request. (See State tables at the end of the report
for complete program recommendations.)
school facilities study
The Committee is concerned that the school facilities owned
by the Federal Government and the local school districts, such
as the Waynesville, Missouri School District, that support
military installations are in desperate need of repair,
renovation, and replacement. Additionally, because of base
closures, realignments, and corresponding changes in missions
impacting military bases across the United States, many
civilian school districts, such as the Central Kitsap School
District, Washington, have experienced tremendous enrollment
growth of dependent children of uniformed personnel. This has
caused overcrowding with some schools reaching their enrollment
capacity. This has been further aggravated by an increase in
the number of special need students.
Accordingly, the Committee directs the Secretary, in
consultation with the Secretary of Education, to provide the
Committee with a report prior to February 15, 1999, describing
the conditions, adequacy of such facilities, including an
estimate of the cost required to address the facilities
identified in the report, and finally the requirement for
additional schools to support military dependents.
The Committee is also concerned how family housing
privatization will impact school district funding. If during
the process of privatization, current base housing is changed
to non-Federal property, school districts will lose essential
Federal funding that is critical for quality educational
programs. The Committee encourages the Department to work with
the local school districts to ensure that impact aid funding is
not reduced as a result of any privatization initiative.
chemical demilitarization
The budget request identified a requirement of $137,500,000
for the construction of chemical weapon demilitarization
facilities in fiscal year 1999. The Committee recommends a
total of $87,500,000 for this program. This is a decrease of
$50,000,000 from the fiscal year 1999 budget because of delays
in obtaining the required construction and environmental
permits. The Committee does not support the Department's
transfer of the Chemical Demilitarization Program funds from
the Office of the Secretary of Defense to the Army Military
Construction Program. The Committee believes that the focus on
this program must remain at the Office of the Secretary of the
Defense rather than at the service level.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
facilities.--The Committee is concerned that the Uniformed
Services University of the Health Sciences [USUHS] has been
precluded from participating in the Military Construction
Program for the past 4 years. USUHS faces significant new space
requirements which were recently validated by the Department.
The Committee urges the Department to address the requirement
for a fifth building construction project in the fiscal year
2000 budget.
Naval submarine base, Bangor, WA.--Of the $1,000,000
provided for planning and design within the ``DOD dependent
school'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,000,000 be made available for the design of an elementary
school for the naval submarine base, Bangor, WA. The Committee
fully expects this contract to be awarded, as early in fiscal
year 1999, as practical.
Medical Facilities
The budget request included $204,782,000 for 23 projects
and for unspecified minor construction to provide hospital and
medical facilities, including treatment, training, and medical
research and development facilities. The Committee recommends
funding for these projects and five additional projects for a
total of $234,532,000. The following hospital and medical
projects are provided for fiscal year 1999:
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/service/installation/
project Request Change Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Air National Guard:
Dannelly Field: Replace medical
training and dining facility.... ........... +6,000 6,000
California:
DMSA:
Beale AFB: Physiological
support fac add/alt..... 3,500 ........... 3,500
Camp Pendleton MCB:
Medical/dental cl repl
(Margarita)............. 3,100 ........... 3,100
Camp Pendleton MCB:
Medical/dental cl repl
(San Mateo)............. 3,200 ........... 3,200
Edwards AFB: Aerospace
medical clinic add/alt.. 6,000 ........... 6,000
Travis AFB: Patient
movement items ops and
dist ctr................ 1,700 ........... 1,700
Florida: DMSA: Pensacola NAS:
Hospital addition/alteration/LSU 25,400 ........... 25,400
Georgia:
DMSA:
Fort Stewart: Medical/
dental clinic
replacement............. 10,400 ........... 10,400
Moody AFB: CMF alteration/
dental clinic addition.. 11,000 ........... 11,000
Illinois: DMSA: Great Lakes Naval
Station: Hospitalman ``A''
school addition................. 7,100 ........... 7,100
Indiana: Air National Guard: Fort
Wayne International Airport;
Replace dining hall and medical
tng facility.................... ........... +6,000 6,000
Louisana: DMSA: Barksdale AFB:
Clinic addition/alteration...... 3,450 ........... 3,450
Nebraska: Air National Guard:
Lincoln Municipal Airport: Joint
medical training facility....... ........... +3,350 3,350
North Carolina: DMSA: Fort Bragg:
44th Medical Brigade WRM
warehouse....................... 6,500 ........... 6,500
North Dakota: DMSA: Grand Forks
AFB: Medical/dental clinic add/
alt............................. 5,600 ........... 5,600
Pennsylvania: DMSA: Carlisle
Barracks: Health clinic addition 4,678 ........... 4,678
South Carolina: DMSA: MCAS
Beaufort: Medical/dental clinic
rep............................. ........... +11,000 11,000
Texas:
DMSA:
Fort Hood: Blood donor
center.................. 3,100 ........... 3,100
Fort Hood: Primary care
clinic.................. 11,000 ........... 11,000
Virginia:
DMSA:
Cheatham Annex: Fleet
hosp spt ops operational
warehouse............... 9,400 ........... 9,400
Cheatham Annex: Fleet
hosp support operation
admin office............ 1,900 ........... 1,900
Portsmouth Naval
Hospital: Hospital
replacement phase X..... 17,954 ........... 17,954
Washington:
Air Force: McChord AFB:
Consolidated medical
training facility........... ........... +3,400 3,400
DMSA:
Bangor NSB: Disease
vector ecology and
control center.......... 5,700 ........... 5,700
Bremerton Naval Hospital:
Hospital addition/
alteration.............. 28,000 ........... 28,000
McChord AFB: Clinic/wrm
warehouse replacement... 20,000 ........... 20,000
Italy: DMSA: Sigonella NAS:
Flight line dispensary.......... 5,300 ........... 5,300
United Kingdom: DMSA: RAF
Lakenheath: Hospital annex
replacement..................... 10,800 ........... 10,800
--------------------------------------
Totals..................... 204,782 +29,750 234,532
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingency construction.--The Committee has provided
$5,000,000 for the ``Contingency construction'' account. This
account provides funds which may be used by the Secretary of
Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The Committee
believes that the funding provided to the account is adequate
to meet the needs of the Department.
Military Construction, Reserve Components
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $464,233,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 179,529,000
Committee recommendation................................ 446,565,000
The Committee recommends $446,565,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components.
This amount is $267,036,000 above the fiscal year 1999 budget
request. This increase reflects the Committee's continued
strong support for the Guard and Reserve.
The Committee's recommended action on each Reserve
component project is reflected in the State list at the end of
this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve component as outlined in the following table:
RESERVE COMPONENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Component Request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard..................... $47,675,000 $124,599,000
Air National Guard...................... 34,761,000 163,161,000
Army Reserve............................ 71,287,000 114,349,000
Naval Reserve........................... 15,271,000 21,621,000
Air Force Reserve....................... 10,535,000 22,835,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 179,529,000 446,565,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee has added $17,302,000 for specific Reserve
component planning and design initiatives and minor
construction projects listed below. The Department is expected
to program the construction funds for these projects.
Planning and design.--The Committee recommendation provides
an additional $12,353,000 over the budget request for planning
and design activities for the Reserve components.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 1999, as
practical:
Camp Rowland, CT.--Of the $15,401,000 provided for planning
and design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,200,000 be made
available for the design of a leadership training academy at
Camp Rowland, NH.
Regional training center, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $150,000 be made available for the design of a regional
training center at Fort Harrison, MT.
Aviation support facility, Concord, NH.--Of the $15,401,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$350,000 be made available for the design of an aviation
support facility in Concord, NH.
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Sand Springs, OK.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $972,000 be made available for an Armed Forces Reserve
Center in Sand Springs, OK.
Armory, Juneau, AK.--Of the $15,401,000 provided for
planning and design with the ``Army National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $730,000 be made
available for the design of an armory in Juneau, AK.
Upgrade airfield facilities, Stanly County Airport, NC.--Of
the $7,962,000 provided for unspecified minor construction with
the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,350,000 be made available to upgrade airfield
facilities at the Stanly County Airport, NC.
Advanced Technology Training Center, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of
the $8,546,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available for an
advanced technology training center at Fort Harrison, MT.
Aviation support hangar, Los Alamitos, CA.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,100,000 be made available for the design of an aviation
support hangar in Los Alamitos, CA.
Readiness center, Oxford, MS.--Of the $15,401,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Army National Guard''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $500,000 be
made available for the design of a readiness center in Oxford,
MS.
Regional maintenance and repair facility, Henderson, TN.--
Of the $15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $70,000 be made available for the design of a
regional maintenance and repair facility in Henderson, TN.
Organizational maintenance shop, Fair Haven, VT.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $200,000 be made available for the design of a
organizational maintenance shop in Fair Haven, VT.
Utilities upgrade, Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve
Center, CA.--Of the $15,401,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $710,000 be made available
for the design of a utilities upgrade for the Los Alamitos
Armed Forces Reserve Center, CA.
Organizational maintenance shop, Henderson, TN.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $203,000 be made available for the design of an
organizational maintenance shop in Henderson, TN.
Ammunition supply point, Camp Roberts, CA.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $640,000 be made available for the design of an ammunition
supply point at Camp Roberts, CA.
CSMS, phase II, Camp Ripley, MN.--Of the $15,401,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$250,000 be made available for the design of a CSMS, phase II
at Camp Ripley, MN.
Qualification training range, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$8,546,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,437,000 be made available for a qualification
training range at Fort Harrison, MT.
Army Scout armories, AK.--Of the $8,546,000 provided for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,200,000 be made available to construct Army National Guard
Scout armories in Kwigillingok, Napaskiak, and Craig.
Multipurpose range (phase III), Camp Shelby, MS.--This
range supports critical training for the National Guard
enhanced readiness brigades in the Southeastern United States.
Existing facilities are inadequate to meet new Army training
strategies for the 155th Separate Armored Brigade for tank crew
and gunnery platoon qualification. The final supplemental
environmental impact statement for the proposed project
construction was recently completed by the Army. The Committee
encourages the National Guard Bureau to incorporate this
readiness project into their long-range resourcing plan.
Dual-use training facility, Northfield, VT.--In the fiscal
year 1998 Military Construction bill, the Committee directed
that not less than $1,000,000 be made available from the ``Army
National Guard'' account for planning and design of the dual
use training facility in Northfield, VT. Of that amount, only
$300,000 has been obligated to date. The Committee urges the
Army National Guard to complete design work on this project.
219th Red Horse flight operation, training, and storage
facility, Malmstrom, AFB, MT.--Of the $8,546,000 provided for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Air National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,450,000 be made available for a flight operation, training,
and storage facility at Malmstrom AFB, MT.
National Guard Training and Community Center, Monticello,
MN.--Of the $8,546,000 provided for unspecified minor
construction within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,100,000 be made
available to build a training and community center in
Monticello, MN.
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Smyrna, TN.--Of the
$15,401,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,500,000 be made available for the design of an Armed
Forces Reserve Center in Smyrna, TN.
Control tower, Stanly County Airport, NC.--Of the
$7,962,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $690,000 be made available to upgrade the control
tower at the Stanly County Airport, NC.
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Salem, OR.--The Committee
urges the Army National Guard to review the requirement for the
Armed Forces Reserve Center located in Salem, OR, for inclusion
in the fiscal year 2000 budget request. In addition to housing
five Reserve component units, this facility will also serve as
the headquarters for emergency coordination for the Oregon
State Police.
C-12 aircraft hangar, AASF, Washoe County, NV.--Of the
$8,546,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,313,000 be made available to build a C-12
hangar in Washoe County, NV.
OMS, Camp Crowder, Neosho, MO.--Of the $8,546,000 provided
in unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs not less than $1,450,000
be made available to add and alter the organizational
maintenance shop [OMS] at Camp Crowder, Neosho, MO.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $152,600,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 185,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 152,600,000
The Committee has provided $152,600,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program
for fiscal year 1999. This amount is $32,400,000 below the
President's fiscal year 1999 budget request but equal to the
fiscal year 1998 appropriated level.
NATO Security Investment Program funds.--The Committee is
concerned that the Department intends to use NATO Security
Investment Program [NSIP] funds to help pay for initiatives
under the Partnership for Peace [PFP] Program for countries
outside of NATO. In fiscal year 1998, the Partnership for Peace
Program received $43,092,000 to pay for these type of
activities in non-NATO countries within Europe.
The NSIP was established to fund critical infrastructure
requirements within the NATO alliance. Every year, there are
many more requirements than available funds. With the addition
of three new member nations this year, there will be
significant funding challenges in the areas of logistics,
communications, and construction that must be addressed by
these limited funds. Accordingly, the Committee has included a
provision which prohibits the use of NSIP funds for any aspect
of the Partnership for Peace Program or support to non-NATO
countries.
Family Housing Overview
The Committee has provided $3,575,620,000 for family
housing construction, operations and maintenance, the
Department's new family housing improvements fund, and the
homeowners assistance program. This amount is $98,290,000 above
the fiscal year 1999 budget request but $316,701,000 below the
amount appropriated in fiscal year 1998.
housing privatization initiative
The Committee is concerned that the Department is delaying
the execution of family housing construction projects for which
funds have been appropriated, for possible transfer into the
family housing improvement fund. Funds that were appropriated
for specific construction projects should be executed as
justified to the Congress. The Committee strongly encourages
the Department to ensure the timely execution of military
family housing construction projects for which funds have been
appropriated by Congress in prior years. These projects must be
allowed to proceed in order to improve the quality of life for
service members and their families at the earliest possible
date.
The Committee has again recommended a provision which
requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the congressional
defense committees of all family housing privatization
solicitations and agreements which contain any clause providing
consideration for base realignment and closure, force
reductions, and extended deployments.
Family Housing, Army
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $1,337,868,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 1,208,173,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,229,223,000
The Committee recommends a total of $1,229,223,000 for
family housing, Army, in fiscal year 1999. This is $21,050,000
over the fiscal year 1999 budget request.
construction
The Committee recommends $70,100,000 for new construction
as shown below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Redstone Arsenal (118 units)... $14,000,000 $14,000,000
Hawaii: Schofield Barracks (64 units)... 14,700,000 14,700,000
North Carolina: Fort Bragg (170 units).. 19,800,000 19,800,000
Texas: Fort Hood (154 units)............ 21,600,000 21,600,000
-------------------------------
Total............................... 70,100,000 70,100,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction Improvements
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
additional amounts provided above the request for construction
improvements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of
Location/project units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska: Fort Richardson........................ 40 $7,400,000
Kentucky: Fort Campbell........................ 95 10,000,000
New Mexico: White Sands Missile Range.......... 36 3,650,000
------------------------
Total.................................... 171 21,050,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $1,388,436,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 1,196,083,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,201,883,000
The Committee recommends $1,201,883,000 for family housing,
Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 1999. This amount is
$5,800,000 over the fiscal year 1999 budget request.
construction
The Committee recommends $59,504,000 for new construction
as shown below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California: Lemoore NAS (162 units)..... $30,379,000 $30,379,000
Hawaii: Naval complex, Oahu (150 units). 29,125,000 29,125,000
-------------------------------
Total............................... 59,504,000 59,504,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following project is to be accomplished within the
additional amounts provided above the budget request for
construction improvements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project No. of units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington: Whidbey Island NAS.......... 80 $5,800,000
-------------------------------
Total............................... 80 5,800,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Air Force
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $1,128,343,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 1,016,030,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,087,470,000
The Committee recommends $1,087,470,000 for family housing,
Air Force, in fiscal year 1999, which is $71,440,000 over the
budget request.
construction
The Committee recommends $179,199,000 for new construction,
instead of $140,499,000 as requested, as shown below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Maxwell AFB (143 units)........ 16,300,000 16,300,000
Alaska: Eielson AFB (46 units).......... 12,932,000 12,932,000
California:
Edwards AFB (48 units).............. 12,580,000 12,580,000
Vandenberg AFB (95 units)........... 18,499,000 18,499,000
Delaware: Dover AFB (55 units).......... 8,998,000 8,998,000
Florida:
MacDill AFB (48 units).............. 7,609,000 7,609,000
Patrick AFB (46 units).............. 9,692,000 9,692,000
Tyndall AFB (122 units)............. 14,500,000 14,500,000
Mississippi:
Keesler AFB (52 units).............. .............. 6,800,000
Columbus AFB (52 units)............. .............. 6,800,000
Montana: Malmstrom AFB (62 units)....... .............. 12,300,000
Nebraska:
Offutt AFB (90 units)............... 12,212,000 12,212,000
Housing maintenance facility........ 900 900
Housing office...................... 870 870
New Mexico: Kirtland AFB (37 units)..... 6,400,000 6,400,000
Ohio: Wright Patterson AFB (40 units)... 5,600,000 5,600,000
Texas:
Dyess AFB (64 units)................ 9,415,000 9,415,000
Sheppard AFB (115 units)............ .............. 12,800,000
Washington:
Fairchild AFB (14 units)............ 2,300,000 2,300,000
Housing office/maintenance facility. 1,692 1,692
-------------------------------
Total............................... 140,499,000 179,199,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
construction improvements
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
additional amounts provided above the request for construction
improvements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of
Location/project units Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California: Travis AFB......................... 105 $10,500,000
New Jersey: McGuire AFB........................ 50 5,800,000
North Carolina: Seymour Johnson AFB............ 95 10,830,000
South Carolina: Charleston AFB................. 94 9,110,000
------------------------
Total.................................... 344 36,240,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Defense-wide
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $37,674,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 37,244,000
Committee recommendation................................ 37,244,000
The Committee recommends $37,244,000 for family housing,
defense-wide, in fiscal year 1999. This amount is equal to the
budget request. Specific details are included in the tables at
the end of the report.
Family Housing Improvement Fund
Appropriations, 1998....................................................
Budget estimate, 1999................................... $7,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,000,000
The Committee recommends $7,000,000 for the family housing
improvement fund in fiscal year 1999 as requested in the budget
request.
Homeowners Assistance Fund
Appropriations, 1998....................................................
Budget estimate, 1999................................... $12,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 12,800,000
The Committee recommends $12,800,000 for the homeowners
assistance fund [HAF]. This is equal to the budget request for
fiscal year 1999. This program benefits military personnel and
Federal civilian employee homeowners in locations where the
housing market becomes depressed due to an announcement of a
base closure or realignment of a military installation. The HAF
provides partial compensation to homeowners for their financial
losses incurred in the sale of their homes. The fund receives
funding from several sources: appropriations, borrowing
authority, revenue from sale of acquired properties,
reimbursable authorities, prior fiscal year unobligated
balances, and recovery of prior year obligations.
Base Closure Overview
The Committee has approved $1,730,704,000 for base closure
and realignment activities during fiscal year 1999. This amount
is $331,170,000 under the amount appropriated by Congress for
fiscal year 1998. A discussion of these activities is included
at the beginning of the report under the heading ``Base
Realignment and Closure.''
The Committee recommends providing full funding for these
important projects. To this end, the Committee provides the
following listing of the specific projects requested by the
Department and appropriated by the Committee for the BRAC
accounts. The Committee provides specific approval and
appropriated funds for the following construction projects:
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
[Fiscal year 1999 budget estimate, base realignment and closure, fiscal
year 1999 BRAC military construction projects]
[Dollars in thousands]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component/State/project description BRAC round Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navy BRAC III construction, fiscal year
1999:
Nevada: Naval Air Station, Fallon:
Bachelor Office Quarters Phase II
(P-XX1T)........................... III.............. 11,100
===============================
Army BRAC IV construction, fiscal year
1999:
Alaska: Fort Greely: Munitions IV............... 1,550
storage facility (PN 47461).
===============================
Colorado:
Fitzsimons Army Medical Center:
Warehouse addition (PN IV............... 1,550
47653).
Reserve Center (PN 50296)... IV............... 2,750
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Colorado.. ................. 4,300
===============================
Indiana: Crane Army ammunition
activity: Surveillance test
facility (PN 50057)............... IV............... 1,850
===============================
Maryland:
Fort Detrick: Physical Fitness IV............... 3,050
Center (PN 48153).
Fort Meade:
Administrative facility DIS IV............... 12,000
(PN 46307).
Administrative facility ESSD IV............... 2,900
renovation (PN 47770).
SDC-W renovation--Pershing IV............... 6,300
Hall (PN 47237).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Maryland.. 24,250
===============================
New York: Fort Totten: Storage IV............... 1,900
facility (PN 46258).
===============================
Pennsylvania: Letterkenny Army IV............... 1,150
Depot: Enclave fencing (PN 49714).
===============================
Virginia:
Fort Pickett: Reserve Center (PN- IV............... 3,100
46354).
Fort Lee: WAC museum (PN 50091). IV............... 2,400
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Army, Virginia...... ................. 5,500
===============================
Various locations: Program IV............... 2,350
management.
===============================
Total, Army BRAC IV construction, ................. 42,850
fiscal year 1999.
===============================
Army BRAC IV family housing
construction, fiscal year 1999:
Alaska: Fort Wainwright: Family IV............... 1,700
housing (PN 47530).
===============================
Navy BRAC IV construction, fiscal year
1999:
California:
Naval Air Weapons Station, Point
Mugu:
Aviation support facilities IV............... 1,500
(260U).
Maintenance and training IV............... 12,800
facilities (261U).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, California ................. 14,300
===============================
District of Columbia: Naval District
of Washington: NAVSEASYSCOM
headquarters building relocation
(009U)............................. IV............... 71,543
===============================
Hawaii: Naval Telecommunications
Center, Makalapa: Building addition
(411U)............................ IV............... 920
===============================
New Jersey: McGuire AFB: Defense IV............... 850
courier service building (935U).
===============================
Tennessee: Naval support activity, IV............... 4,200
Memphis: Building renovation (329U).
===============================
Texas: Naval Air Station, Corpus
Christi: Sled ramp facility and
land acquisition (421U)............ IV............... 13,313
===============================
Virginia:
Naval Station, Norfolk: Building IV............... 3,970
renovations and alterations
(317U).
Naval Air Station, Oceana:
Strike Fighter Weapons School
additions (163U)............... IV............... 4,073
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Navy, Virginia.... ................. 8,043
===============================
Total, Navy BRAC IV ................. 113,169
construction, fiscal year
1999.
===============================
Air Force BRAC IV construction, fiscal
year 1999:
New York; Stewart International
Airport: Communications training
complex (WHAY 959635).............. IV............... 6,000
===============================
Oklahoma:
Tinker AFB:
Alter product management IV............... 2,300
(WWYK990032).
Alter engine test cell IV............... 3,800
(WWYK993200).
ADAL fuel air facility IV............... 1,300
(WWYK993201A).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, ................. 7,400
Oklahoma.
===============================
Texas:
Kelly AFB:
Security fence/gates (MBPB IV............... 400
993205R1).
Vehicle OPS/maintenance IV............... 6,200
complex (MBPB 993213R1).
Fuel operations facility IV............... 1,200
(MBPB 993214R1).
Reconfigure utility systems IV............... 2,500
(MBPB 993230).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, Texas ................. 10,300
===============================
Utah:
Hill AFB:
GTE Test Cell (KRSM 993009). IV............... 2,100
Alter Product Management/ IV............... 5,300
Composites (KRSM983102).
F-117 Radar Facility (KRSM IV............... 1,100
983002).
-------------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force, Utah. ................. 8,500
===============================
Various Locations: Planning and IV............... 700
design (BCL 99RD4).
===============================
Total, Air Force BRAC IV ................. 32,900
construction, fiscal year 1999.
===============================
Defense Logistics Agency BRAC IV
construction, fiscal year 1999:
Utah: Defense distribution region
west Defense Depot Hill, UT:
Deployable medical systems
warehouse.......................... IV............... 31,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Defense Logistics Agency and Defense Information Systems Agency
BRAC III and IV Construction, Fiscal Year 1998. Defense Logistics
Agency and Defense Information Systems Agency have no construction
projects relating to any BRAC round requested in fiscal year 1998.
Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part II
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $116,754,000
The Committee recognizes that fiscal year 1998 was the last
year for appropriations into this account.
Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part III
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $768,702,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 433,464,000
Committee recommendation................................ 433,464,000
The Committee recommends $433,464,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part III as authorized. This
is a decrease of $335,238,000 below the amount appropriated for
fiscal year 1998.
Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part IV
Appropriations, 1998.................................... $1,175,398,000
Budget estimate, 1999................................... 1,297,240,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,297,240,000
The Committee recommends $1,297,240,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part IV as authorized. This is
an increase of $121,842,000 above the amount appropriated for
fiscal year 1998.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense
Department, and new provisions. The Committee recommendations
are as follows:
Sec. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee
contract for work, except in cases of contracts for
environmental restoration at base closure sites.
Sec. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor
vehicles.
Sec. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.
Sec. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the
continental United States for which specific appropriations
have not been made.
Sec. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or
land easements.
Sec. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land,
prepare a site, or install utilities for any family housing
except housing for which funds have been made available.
Sec. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to
transfer or relocate activities among installations.
Sec. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless
American producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been
allowed to compete.
Sec. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in
foreign nations.
Sec. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas
without prior notification.
Sec. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference
of $500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.
Sec. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors
for military construction in the United States territories and
possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the
Arabian Gulf.
Sec. 113. Requires notification of military exercises
involving construction in excess of $100,000.
Sec. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of
the year.
Sec. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be
available for construction authorized during the current
session of Congress.
Sec. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay
the cost of supervision for any project being completed with
lapsed funds.
Sec. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1
fiscal year to execute a construction project, provided that
the total obligation for such project is consistent with the
total amount appropriated for the project.
Sec. 118. Allows expired funds to be transferred to the
``Foreign currency fluctuations, construction, defense''
account.
Sec. 119. Directs the Department to report annually on
actions taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater
share of the common defense budget.
Sec. 120. Allows transfer of proceeds from ``Base
realignment and closure accounts, part I'' to the continuing
base realignment and closure accounts.
Sec. 121. States that the Department of Defense family
improvement fund shall be the sole source of funds available
for administrative costs relating to military family housing
privatization initiatives.
Sec. 122. Permits transfer of funds from the base
realignment and closure accounts to the homeowners assistance
fund, defense.
Sec. 123. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership
for Peace Program.
Sec. 124. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the
congressional defense committees of all family housing
privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any
clause providing consideration for base realignment and
closure, force reductions and extended deployments.
Sec. 125. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners
Assistance Program.
Sec. 126. Provides authority to the Secretary of the Navy
to purchase land at Paine Field, WA.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
Due to the early Committee action on the fiscal year 1999
Military Construction appropriations bill, an original Senate
bill was reported by the Appropriations Committee to the
Senate.
At the point when the Committee reports this measure, the
Congress has not completed action on S. 2057, the Fiscal Year
1999 Defense Authorization Act. As a consequence, the Committee
has acted in good faith in its attempt to comply fully with
requirements stipulated under paragraph 7, rule XVI.
The Committee anticipates that Congress will authorize the
amounts appropriated in this act.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, the Committee
ordered reported en bloc, S. 2159, an original Agriculture,
Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related
Agencies appropriations bill, 1999, S. 2160, an original
Military Construction appropriations bill, 1999, and an
original Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban
Development, and Independent Agencies appropriations bill,
1999, each subject to amendment and each subject to its budget
allocations, by a recorded vote of 27-0, a quorum being
present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Stevens
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Domenici
Mr. Bond
Mr. Gorton
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Burns
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mr. Campbell
Mr. Craig
Mr. Faircloth
Mrs. Hutchison
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Inouye
Mr. Hollings
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Bumpers
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Reid
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray
Mr. Dorgan
Mrs. Boxer
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the committee.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee Change from
Installation and project Budget recommen- budget
request dation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ARMY:
ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT:
AMMUNITION CONTAINERIZATION
COMPLEX.................... 3,550 3,550 ..............
FORT RUCKER: AVIATION
WARFIGHTING SIMULATION
CENTER..................... .......... 10,000 +10,000
REDSTONE ARSENAL: MISSILE
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ANNEX
(PHASE II)................ 13,600 13,600 ..............
AIR FORCE:
MAXWELL AFB:
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.. 1,837 1,837 ..............
OFFICER TRAINING SCHOOL
DINING FACILITY........ 4,796 4,796 ..............
OFFICER TRAINING SCHOOL
STUDENT DORMITORIES.... 12,765 12,765 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DANNELLY
FIELD: REPLACE MEDICAL TRAINING
AND DINING FACILITY............ .......... 6,000 +6,000
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MAXWELL AFB:
CONSOLIDATED AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE FACILITY........... 5,200 5,200 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA............ 41,748 57,748 +16,000
=======================================
ALASKA
ARMY:
FORT WAINWRIGHT:
CENTRALIZED VEHICLE WASH
FACILITY............... .......... 3,100 +3,100
WHOLE BARRACKS RENEWAL.. .......... 19,500 +19,500
AIR FORCE:
EIELSON AFB:
CONSOLIDATED MUNITIONS
FACILITY............... 4,352 4,352 ..............
WEAPONS AND RELEASE
SYSTEMS SHOP........... .......... 6,200 +6,200
DEFENSE-WIDE: ELMENDORF AFB:
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM
(PHASE I)...................... 19,500 19,500 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: KULIS ANGB
(ANCHORAGE): VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE/FIRE STATION
COMPLEX........................ .......... 10,400 +10,400
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA............. 23,852 63,052 +39,200
=======================================
ARIZONA
NAVY:
FLAGSTAFF NAVAL OBSERVATORY:
OPTIC INTERFEROMETER
SUPPORT FACILITY........... 990 990 ..............
YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS................... 11,010 11,010 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: PAPAGO
MILITARY RESERVATION (PHOENIX):
COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE
SHOP........................... 10,640 10,640 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA............ 22,640 22,640 ..............
=======================================
ARKANSAS
ARMY: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL:
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE III)........... 16,500 .......... -16,500
AIR FORCE: LITTLE ROCK AFB:
UPGRADE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. .......... 1,500 +1,500
DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF
ARSENAL: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE III).................... .......... 10,000 +10,000
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS........... 16,500 11,500 -5,000
=======================================
CALIFORNIA
ARMY: FORT IRWIN: HELIPORT
(PHASE III).................... 7,000 7,000 ..............
NAVY:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS
BASE:
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS............... 12,400 12,400 ..............
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS............... 15,840 15,840 ..............
CHINA LAKE NAVAL AIR WARFARE
CENTER WEAPONS DIVISION:
MISSILE MAGAZINES.......... 3,240 3,240 ..............
LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION:
AIRFRAMES FACILITY
MODIFICATIONS.......... 1,510 1,510 ..............
HANGAR RENOVATIONS...... 5,430 5,430 ..............
TRAINING FACILITY
ADDITION............... 4,270 4,270 ..............
WEAPONS ASSEMBLY
FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS.. 9,430 9,430 ..............
MIRAMAR MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS................... 29,570 29,570 ..............
NAVAL FACILITY SAN CLEMENTE
ISLAND: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS................... 8,350 8,350 ..............
SAN DIEGO NAVAL SUBMARINE
BASE: SUBMARINE SUPPORT
FACILITY................... 11,400 11,400 ..............
AIR FORCE:
EDWARDS AFB: RENOVATE
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
FACILITY................... 10,361 10,361 ..............
TRAVIS AFB: CONTROL TOWER... .......... 4,250 +4,250
VANDENBERG AFB:
ADD/ALTER MISSILE
MAINTENANCE FACILITY... 9,500 9,500 ..............
SPACE INITITAL
QUALIFICATION TRAINING
ACADEMIC FAC........... 9,209 9,209 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BEALE AFB: ADD/ALTER
PHYSIOLOGICAL SUPPORT
FACILITY................... 3,500 3,500 ..............
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS
BASE:
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC
REPLACEMENT (MARGARITA) 3,100 3,100 ..............
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC
REPLACEMENT (SAN MATEO) 3,200 3,200 ..............
EDWARDS AFB: ADD/ALTER
AEROSPACE MEDICAL CLINIC... 6,000 6,000 ..............
NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE,
CORONADO: SOF AMPHIBIOUS
OPERATIONS FACILITY........ 3,600 3,600 ..............
SAN DIEGO NAVAL HOSPITAL:
WATER STORAGE TANK......... 1,350 1,350 ..............
TRAVIS AFB: PATIENT MOVEMENT
ITEMS/OPERATIONS AND DIST
CENTER..................... 1,700 1,700 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA......... 159,960 164,210 +4,250
=======================================
COLORADO
AIR FORCE:
FALCON AFS:
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT
FACILITY............... 9,601 9,601 ..............
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER .......... 5,800 +5,800
US AIR FORCE ACADEMY
(COLORADO SPRINGS): ADD/
ALTER PREP SCHOOL BUILDINGS 4,413 4,413 ..............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT CARSON: ADD/
ALTER ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/EQUIPMENT
CONCENTRATION SITE............. 1,101 1,101 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO........... 15,115 20,915 +5,800
=======================================
CONNECTICUT
NAVY: NSB NEW LONDON: WATERFRONT
IMPROVEMENTS................... .......... 12,510 +12,510
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ORANGE ANG
STATION: AIR CONTROL SQUADRON
COMPLEX........................ .......... 11,000 +11,000
ARMY RESERVE: WEST HARTFORD:
LAND ACQUISITION............... 1,491 1,491 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONNECTICUT........ 1,491 25,001 +23,510
=======================================
DELAWARE
AIR FORCE: DOVER AFB: AIRMAN
LEADERSHIP SCHOOL.............. .......... 1,600 +1,600
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: DAGSBORO:
READINESS CENTER............... .......... 3,609 +3,609
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, DELAWARE........... .......... 5,209 +5,209
=======================================
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NAVY: COMMANDANT, NAVAL DISTRICT
(WASHINGTON, DC): FITNESS
CENTER......................... 790 790 ..............
AIR FORCE: BOLLING AFB: HONOR
GUARD TECHNICAL SCHOOL......... 2,948 2,948 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA................. 3,738 3,738 ..............
=======================================
FLORIDA
ARMY: MIAMI: SOUTHCOM
HEADQUARTERS AND LAND
ACQUISITION.................... 26,700 .......... -26,700
NAVY:
KEY WEST NAVAL AIR STATION:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER... 3,730 3,730 ..............
MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: FLEET
RECREATION CENTER.......... .......... 3,400 +3,400
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR
STATION: AIRFIELD
ALTERATIONS................ .......... 1,400 +1,400
AIR FORCE:
EGLIN AFB:
DORMITORY............... 7,866 7,866 ..............
SANTA ROSA ISLAND TEST
SITES.................. 12,571 12,571 ..............
EGLIN AFB AUXILIARY FIELD 9
(HURLBURT FIELD):
CONTROL TOWER........... 2,014 2,014 ..............
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.. 1,823 1,823 ..............
MACDILL AFB:
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.. 2,494 2,494 ..............
KC-135 SIMULATOR
FACILITY............... 2,514 2,514 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE
DEF FUEL SUPPORT POINT
JACKSONVILLE-MAYPORT ANNEX:
REPLACE FUEL TANKS......... 11,020 11,020 ..............
DEFENSE FUEL SUPPORT POINT
JACKSONVILLE: REPLACE FUEL
TANKS...................... 11,000 11,000 ..............
EGLIN AFB: CENTRAL ENERGY
PLANT (EGLIN HOSPITAL)..... 9,200 9,200 ..............
EGLIN AFB AUXILIARY FIELD 9
(HURLBURT FIELD): CLEAR
WATER AIRCRAFT RINSE....... 2,400 2,400 ..............
EGLIN AFB AUXILIARY FIELD 3
(DUKE FIELD): GENERAL
PURPOSE AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE SHOP........... 2,210 2,210 ..............
MACDILL AFB: RENOVATE
COMMAND AND CONTROL
FACILITY................... 8,400 8,400 ..............
PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION:
ADD/ALTER HOSPITAL/LIFE
SAFETY UPGRADES............ 25,400 25,400 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: PENSACOLA:
READINESS CENTER............... .......... 3,975 +3,975
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA............ 129,342 111,417 -17,925
=======================================
GEORGIA
ARMY:
FORT BENNING: WHOLE BARRACKS
COMPLEX RENEWAL............ 28,600 28,600 ..............
FORT STEWART: GENERAL
PURPOSE WAREHOUSE.......... .......... 17,000 +17,000
NAVY: KINGS BAY NAVAL SUBMARINE
BASE: MAGNETIC SILENCING
FACILITY MODIFICATIONS......... .......... 2,550 +2,550
AIR FORCE:
ROBINS AFB:
DEPOT PLANT SERVICES
FACILITY............... 11,894 11,894 ..............
JSTARS DINING FACILITY.. .......... 6,000 +6,000
DEFENSE-WIDE:
MOODY AFB: ALTER CENTRAL
MEDICAL FACILITY/ADD DENTAL
CLINIC..................... 11,000 11,000 ..............
FORT STEWART: MEDICAL/DENTAL
CLINIC REPLACEMENT......... 10,400 10,400 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ROBINS AFB:
B-1 WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEMS/
LOAD CREW TRAINING FAC......... 3,250 3,250 ..............
NAVY RESERVE:
NAS ATLANTA:
HANGAR ADDITION......... .......... 4,100 +4,100
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS MODERNIZATION. .......... 2,250 +2,250
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA........ 65,144 97,044 +31,900
=======================================
HAWAII
ARMY:
SCHOFIELD BARRACKS:
LAND ACQUISITION, KAHUKU
TRAINING AREA.......... .......... 23,500 +23,500
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 47,500 47,500 ..............
NAVY:
KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS................... 27,410 27,410 ..............
MCB HAWAII:
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS............... .......... 19,000 +19,000
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL/WASTE
CONSOLIDATION FAC...... .......... 4,570 +4,570
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL SUBMARINE
BASE: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS MODERNIZATION..... 8,060 8,060 ..............
PEARL HARBOR FLEET AND
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER:
CENTRAL RECEIVING FACILITY. 9,730 9,730 ..............
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL STATION:
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM UPGRADES............ 18,180 18,180 ..............
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL SHIPYARD:
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
BUILDING................... 11,400 11,400 ..............
PEARL HARBOR NAVY PUBLIC
WORKS CENTER:
SEWER OUTFALL EXTENSION. 22,877 22,877 ..............
STEAM CONDENSATE RETURN
SYSTEM................. 6,090 6,090 ..............
WAHIAWA NAVAL COMPUTER AND
TELECOM AREA MASTER STATION
(EASTERN PACIFIC): FIRE
STATION.................... 1,970 1,970 ..............
AIR FORCE: HICKAM AFB: REPAIR
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT.............. 5,890 5,890 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: HICKMAN AFB:
REPLACE BASE CIVIL ENG. NMAINT.
FACILITY....................... .......... 5,100 +5,100
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII............. 159,107 211,277 +52,170
=======================================
IDAHO
AIR FORCE:
MOUNTAIN HOME AFB:
B1-B CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS SHOP......... .......... 4,100 +4,100
B1-B MUNITIONS STORAGE
IGLOOS................. .......... 1,500 +1,500
DORMITORY............... 8,897 8,897 ..............
LAND ACQUISITION........ 1,000 1,000 ..............
RANGE IMPROVEMENTS...... 2,400 2,400 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN FIELD
(BOISE): ADD/ALTER READINESS
CEN- TER...................... 4,224 4,224 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BOISE AIR
TERMINAL: ADD/ALT BASE SUPPLY
COMPLEX........................ .......... 3,000 +3,000
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO.............. 16,521 25,121 +8,600
=======================================
ILLINOIS
ARMY: ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL:
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. 5,300 5,300 ..............
NAVY:
GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING
CENTER:
APPLIED INSTRUCTION
BUILDING MODIFICATIONS. 5,750 5,750 ..............
GAS TURBINE TRAINING
FACILITY............... 7,410 7,410 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: GREAT LAKES NAVAL
STATION: HOSPITALMAN SCHOOL
ADDI- TION.................... 7,100 7,100 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS........... 25,560 25,560 ..............
=======================================
INDIANA
ARMY:
CRANE ARMY AMMUNITION
ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION
CONTAINERIZATION COMPLEX
(PHASE II)................. 7,100 7,100 ..............
NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION
PLANT:
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I)..... 27,500 .......... -27,500
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
SUPPORT................ 2,000 .......... -2,000
NAVY:
DEFENSE-WIDE:
NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION
PLANT:
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I)..... .......... 15,000 +15,000
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
SUPPORT................ .......... 2,000 +2,000
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
HULMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT:
FUEL CELL CORROSION CONTROL
AND FIRE STATION........... .......... 6,000 +6,000
FORT WAYNE INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT: REPLACE DINING
HALL AND MEDICAL TRAINING
FACILITY................... .......... 6,000 +6,000
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA.......... 36,600 36,100 -500
=======================================
IOWA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP DODGE: FUEL DISPENSING
FACILITY................... 737 737 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
DES MOINES: REPLACE SECURITY
POLICE OPERATION FACILITY.. .......... 4,000 +4,000
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, IOWA............... 737 4,737 +4,000
=======================================
KANSAS
ARMY:
FORT LEAVENWORTH: US
DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS
(PHASE II)................. 29,000 29,000 ..............
FORT RILEY: WHOLE BARRACKS
COMPLEX RENEWAL PHASE II... .......... 16,500 +16,500
AIR FORCE: MCCONNELL AFB: ADD TO
CENTRAL DEPLOYMENT CENTER...... .......... 2,900 +2,900
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
FORBES FIELD: KC-135
MAINTENANCE HANGAR UPGRADE. .......... 9,800 +9,800
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS............. 29,000 58,200 +29,200
=======================================
KENTUCKY
ARMY:
BLUEGRASS ARMY DEPOT
(RICHMOND): AMMUNITION
CONTAINERIZATION COMPLEX... 5,300 5,300 ..............
FORT CAMPBELL:
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 41,000 41,000 ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL PHASE II....... .......... 15,500 +15,500
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT CAMPBELL:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.... 15,000 15,000 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: WESTERN
KENTUCKY TRAINING SITE
(GREENVILLE): TRAINING COMPLEX
(PHASES IV AND V).............. 5,435 5,435 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: STANDIFORD
FIELD, LOUISVILLE: REP
COMPOSITE AERIAL POST/ALCE TRG.
FACILITY....................... .......... 4,100 +4,100
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY........... 66,735 86,335 +19,600
=======================================
LOUISIANA
ARMY: FORT POLK: CONSOLIDATED
RAIL COMPLEX................... .......... 8,300 +8,300
AIR FORCE: BARKSDALE AFB:
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER........ .......... 9,300 +9,300
DEFENSE-WIDE: BARKSDALE AFB: ADD/
ALTER MEDICAL CLINICS.......... 3,450 3,450 ..............
NAVY RESERVE: NEW ORLEANS NAVAL
AIR STATION: ENGINE TEST CELL
MODIFICATIONS.................. 2,200 2,200 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, LOUISIANA.......... 5,650 23,250 +17,600
=======================================
MAINE
NAVY: NAS BRUNSWICK: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS.............. .......... 15,220 +15,220
=======================================
MARYLAND
ARMY:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I)..... 26,500 .......... -26,500
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
SUPPORT................ 1,850 .......... -1,850
FORT DETRICK:
PHYSICAL FITNESS
TRAINING CENTER........ 3,550 3,550 ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL (PHASE I)...... .......... 7,100 +7,100
FORT MEADE: EMERGENCY
SERVICE CENTER............. .......... 5,300 +5,300
NAVY: INDIAN HEAD NAVAL SURFACE
WARFARE CENTER DIVISION:
ANNEALING OVEN FACILITY........ 6,680 6,680 ..............
U.S. NAVAL ACADEMY: DEMOLISH
NTRF TOWERS................ .......... 4,300 +4,300
AIR FORCE: ANDREWS AFB: CHILD
DEVELOPMENT CENTER............. 4,448 4,448 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:....
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE I)..... .......... 15,000 +15,000
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION
SUPPORT................ .......... 1,850 +1,850
FORT MEADE: PERIMETER FENCE
(WEST)..................... 668 668 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND........... 43,696 48,896 +5,200
=======================================
MASSACHUSETTS
AIR FORCE: HANSCOM AFB: RENOVATE
ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT FACILITY .......... 10,000 +10,000
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DEVENS:
RESERVE REGIONAL SUPPORT
COMMAND HEADQUARTERS FAC....... 3,335 3,335 ..............
NAVY RESERVE: FORT DEVENS:
RESERVE CENTER RENOVATIONS..... 840 840 ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: WESTOVER
AFRB: CONTROL TOWER............ .......... 5,000 +5,000
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS...... 4,175 19,175 +15,000
=======================================
MICHIGAN
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ALPENA COUNTY REGIONAL
AIRPORT (ALPENA):
FIRE STATION............ .......... 5,100 +5,100
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM... 3,900 3,900 ..............
SELFRIDGE ANGB (MT CLEMENS):
REPLACE CONTROL TOWER/
RADAR APPROACH CONTROL
CTR.................... 5,200 5,200 ..............
INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADE.. .......... 9,800 +9,800
ARMY RESERVE: WALKER: US ARMY
RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINT SHOP..................... 9,439 9,439 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MICHIGAN........... 18,539 33,439 +14,900
=======================================
MINNESOTA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP
RIPLEY: MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE
GUN/SNIPER RANGE............... 1,023 1,023 ..............
NAVY RESERVE: NAVAL RESERVE
READINESS COMMAND
(MINNEAPOLIS): ADMINISTRATIVE
HEADQUARTERS BUILDING.......... 3,630 3,630 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MINNESOTA.......... 4,653 4,653 ..............
=======================================
MISSISSIPPI
NAVY: GULFPORT NAVAL
CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
REPLACEMENT.................... 10,670 10,670 ..............
AIR FORCE:
COLUMBUS AFB:
BACHELOR OFFICERS
QUARTERS............... .......... 5,700 +5,700
CORROSION CONTROL
FACILITY............... .......... 2,500 +2,500
KEESLER AFB:
STUDENT DORMITORIES (2). 29,770 29,770 ..............
TRAINING SUPPORT
FACILITY............... 5,756 5,756 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: CAMP SHELBY:
REPLACE BULK FUEL FACILITY..... 5,300 5,300 ..............
KEESLER AFB:
BIOENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING FACILITY....... 700 700 ..............
STENNIS SPACE CENTER: SOF
OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY .......... 5,500 +5,500
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BROOKHAVEN:
REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER/OMS... .......... 5,247 +5,247
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI........ 52,196 71,143 +18,947
=======================================
MISSOURI
ARMY: FORT LEONARD WOOD:
ENGINEER QUALIFICATION RANGE... 5,200 5,200 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ROSECRANS
MEMORIAL AIRPORT: UPGRADE
AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON PHASE I. .......... 9,600 +9,600
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI........... 5,200 14,800 +9,600
=======================================
MONTANA
AIR FORCE:
MALMSTROM AFB:
MISSILE OPERATIONS SHOP. .......... 5,300 +5,300
REPLACE DORMITORY....... .......... 7,900 +7,900
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HELENA:
RESERVE CENTER................. .......... 21,690 +21,690
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA............ .......... 34,890 +34,890
=======================================
NEBRASKA
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: LINCOLN
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT: JOINT
MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY...... .......... 3,350 +3,350
=======================================
NEVADA
AIR FORCE:
INDIAN SPRINGS AUXILIARY AIR
FIELD:
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE
LOGISTICS AND TRAINING
FAC.................... 3,965 3,965 ..............
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
UNIT................... 7,059 7,059 ..............
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE
COMMUNICATION
MAINTENANCE FACILITY/
INFRASTRUCTURE/
UTILITIES.............. 3,989 3,989 ..............
NELLIS AFB: DORMITORY....... 6,378 6,378 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CARSON
CITY: READINESS CENTER......... .......... 5,860 +5,860
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA............. 21,391 27,251 +5,860
=======================================
NEW JERSEY
AIR FORCE: MCGUIRE AFB: DINING
FACILITY....................... 6,044 6,044 ..............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DIX:
AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT........ .......... 8,731 +8,731
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY......... 6,044 14,775 +8,731
=======================================
NEW MEXICO
AIR FORCE:
CANNON AFB: REPAIR RUNWAY
KEEL SECTION 2............. .......... 6,500 +6,500
KIRTLAND AFB:
REP NUCLEAR WEAPON
INTEGRATION BUILDING... .......... 6,800 +6,800
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.. 1,774 1,774 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: HOLLOMAN AFB: WAR
READINESS MATERIAL WAREHOUSE... 1,300 1,300 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: TAOS:
READINESS CENTER............... .......... 3,300 +3,300
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO......... 3,074 19,674 +16,600
=======================================
NEW YORK
ARMY:
FORT DRUM:
CONSOLIDATED SOLDIER AND
FAMILY SUPPORT CTR
(PHASE I............... .......... 7,000 +7,000
INCLEMENT WEATHER
WEAPONS TRNG FAC....... .......... 4,650 +4,650
U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY (WEST
POINT): CADET PHYSICAL
DEVELOPMENT CTR (PHASE I).. 12,000 12,000 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: U.S. MILITARY
ACADEMY (WEST POINT):
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION/
RENOVATION..................... 2,840 2,840 ..............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT WADSWORTH:
ADD/ALTER US ARMY RESERVE
CENTER (PHASE I)............... 6,424 6,424 ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: NIAGARA FALLS
ARS: CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE
FACILITY....................... .......... 3,900 +3,900
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK........... 21,264 36,814 +15,550
=======================================
NORTH CAROLINA
ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
DEPLOYMENT STAGING
COMPLEX................ 30,000 30,000 ..............
FORCE PROTECTION
FACILITIES............. .......... 8,300 +8,300
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 47,000 47,000 ..............
NAVY:
CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS
BASE:
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS............... .......... 15,700 +15,700
FIRE STATION............ 1,830 1,830 ..............
INFRASTRUCTURE PHYSICAL
SECURITY............... 12,770 12,770 ..............
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS
AIR STATION:
AIRCRAFT FIRE AND RESCUE
STATION ADDITION....... 1,620 1,620 ..............
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 4,420 4,420 ..............
AIR FORCE: SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB:
EDUCATION CENTER AND LIBRARY... .......... 6,100 +6,100
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BRAGG: WAR READINESS
MATERIAL WAREHOUSE......... 6,500 6,500 ..............
CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS
BASE: BREWSTER MIDDLE
SCHOOL..................... 16,900 16,900 ..............
POPE AFB: HYDRANT FUEL
SYSTEM..................... 4,100 4,100 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA..... 125,140 155,240 +30,100
=======================================
NORTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE:
GRAND FORKS AFB:
ADD TO PHYSICAL FITNESS
CENTER................. .......... 8,800 +8,800
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.. 2,686 2,686 ..............
MINOT AFB: TAXIWAY REPAIR... .......... 8,500 +8,500
DEFENSE-WIDE: GRAND FORKS AFB:
ADD/ALTER MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC 5,600 5,600 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BISMARCK:
ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FAC/
READINESS CTR EXPANSION........ 6,240 6,240 ..............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
HECTOR FIELD (FARGO):
ADD/ALTER BASE SUPPLY
COMPLEX................ .......... 3,650 +3,650
REGIONAL FIRE TRAINING
FACILITY............... 800 800 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA... 15,326 36,276 +20,950
=======================================
OHIO
AIR FORCE:
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB:
ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT
COMPLEX (PHASE IV-A)... 22,000 22,000 ..............
ADAL PHYSICAL FITNESS
CENTER................. .......... 4,600 +4,600
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SPRINGFIELD-
BECKLEY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT: BASE
CIVIL ENGINEER/SECURITY FORCES
COMPLEX........................ .......... 5,000 +5,000
ARMY RESERVE: GAHANNA: US ARMY
RESERVE CENTER PURCHASE........ 3,115 3,115 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO............... 25,115 34,715 +9,600
=======================================
OKLAHOMA
ARMY:
MCALESTER ARMY AMMUNITION
PLANT: AMMUNITION
CONTAINERIZATION COMPLEX... 10,800 10,800 ..............
FORT SILL:
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT SHOP
(PHASE I).............. 13,800 13,800 ..............
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 20,500 20,500 ..............
AIR FORCE:
ALTUS AFB: CONTROL TOWER.... .......... 4,000 +4,000
TINKER AFB:
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
SQUADRON OPERATIONS
FACILITY............... 5,085 5,085 ..............
SQUADRON OPERATION AND
MOBILITY CENTER........ .......... 10,800 +10,800
DORMITORY............... 9,100 9,100 ..............
VANCE AFB:
ADD/ALTER PHYSICAL
FITNESS CENTER......... .......... 4,400 +4,400
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY.. 1,823 1,823 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT SILL: REPLACE
FUEL STORAGE FACILITY.......... 3,500 3,500 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: LEXINGTON:
ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY
EXPANSION...................... 7,382 7,382 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA........... 71,990 91,190 +19,200
=======================================
OREGON
ARMY: UMATILLA ARMY DEPOT:
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE IV)............ 50,950 .......... -50,950
DEFENSE-WIDE: UMATILLA ARMY
DEPOT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE IV)..................... .......... 30,950 +30,950
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, OREGON............. 50,950 30,950 -20,000
=======================================
PENNSYLVANIA
NAVY:
NAVICP MECHANICSBURG: CHILD
DEVELOPMENT CENTER......... .......... 1,600 +1,600
NAVICP PHILADELPHIA: CHILD
DEVELOPMENT CENTER......... .......... 1,550 +1,550
DEFENSE-WIDE: CARLISLE BARRACKS:
HEALTH CLINIC ADDITION......... 4,678 4,678 ..............
ARMY RESERVE: U.S. ARMY RESERVE
CENTER: 99TH REGIONAL SUPPORT
COMMAND PH II.................. .......... 19,512 +19,512
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA....... 4,678 27,340 +22,662
=======================================
RHODE ISLAND
NAVY:
NEWPORT NAVAL EDUCATION AND
TRAINING CENTER: BOILER
PLANT MODIFICATIONS........ 5,630 5,630 ..............
NEWPORT NAVAL UNDERWATER
SYSTEMS CENTER: UNDERSEA
WARFARE FACILITY........... 9,140 9,140 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND....... 14,770 14,770 ..............
=======================================
SOUTH CAROLINA
NAVY:
BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION: MISSILE MAGAZINES. 1,770 1,770 ..............
CHARLESTON NAVAL WEAPONS
STATION: ORDNANCE RAILROAD
REALIGNMENT................ 9,737 9,737 ..............
PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS
RECRUIT DEPOT: WEAPONS
BATTALLION MESSHALL........ 7,960 7,960 ..............
AIR FORCE:
CHARLESTON AFB:
C-17 LIFE SUPPORT
FACILITY............... 4,701 4,701 ..............
C-17 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT.... 7,639 7,639 ..............
C-17 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT.... 6,769 6,769 ..............
DINING FACILITY......... 5,221 5,221 ..............
SHAW AFB: EDUCATIONAL CENTER
AND LIBRARY................ .......... 8,500 +8,500
DEFENSE-WIDE: BEAUFORT MARINE
CORPS AIR STATION: MEDICAL/
DENTAL CLINIC REP.............. .......... 11,000 +11,000
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
SPARTANBURG: READINESS CENTER.. .......... 5,260 +5,260
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA..... 43,797 68,557 +24,760
=======================================
SOUTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: ADD/
ALTER SQUADRON OPERATIONS
FACILITY....................... .......... 6,500 +6,500
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: JOE FOSS
FIELD: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND
ASE FACILITY................... .......... 5,200 +5,200
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA....... .......... 11,700 +11,700
=======================================
TEXAS
ARMY:
FORT BLISS: TACTICAL VEHICLE
OVERPASS................... .......... 4,100 +4,100
FORT HOOD: RAILHEAD FACILITY
(PHASE I).................. 17,500 17,500 ..............
FORT SAM HOUSTON:
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 21,800 21,800 ..............
DINING FACILITY......... .......... 5,500 +5,500
AIR FORCE:
DYESS AFB: B-1B SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT SHOP ADDITION.... .......... 1,400 +1,400
LACKLAND AFB:...............
DORMITORY............... 6,800 6,800 ..............
OPERATIONS FACILITY..... 8,130 8,130 ..............
RANDOLPH AFB: BASE
OPERATIONS FACILITY........ 3,166 3,166 ..............
GOODFELLOW AFB: STUDENT
DORMITORY.................. .......... 7,300 +7,300
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT HOOD:
BLOOD DONOR CENTER...... 3,100 3,100 ..............
PRIMARY CARE CLINIC..... 11,000 11,000 ..............
NAVY RESERVE: GALVESTON: MARINE
RESERVE TRAINING CENTER........ 4,090 4,090 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS.............. 75,586 93,886 +18,300
=======================================
UTAH
ARMY: TOOELE ARMY DEPOT:
AMMUNITION CONTAINERIZATION
COMPLEX........................ 3,900 3,900 ..............
AIR FORCE:
HILL AFB:
ADD TO CHILD DEVELOPMENT
CENTER................. .......... 1,500 +1,500
WAR READINESS ASSET
WAREHOUSE.............. .......... 2,600 +2,600
ARMY RESERVE:
SALT LAKE CITY: US ARMY
RESERVE CENTER/
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE
SHOP/DIRECT SUPPORT--
GENERAL SUPPORT/EQUIPMENT
CONCENTRATION SITE......... 13,200 17,306 +4,106
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH............. 17,100 25,306 +8,206
=======================================
VERMONT
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BURLINGTON
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: BASE
SUPPLY COMPLEX................. .......... 5,500 +5,500
=======================================
VIRGINIA
ARMY:
CHARLOTTESVILLE: NATIONAL
GROUND INTELLIGENCE CENTER
FACILITY................... 46,200 46,200 ..............
FORT EUSTIS:
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER. .......... 4,650 +4,650
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 36,531 36,531 ..............
FORT MEYER: BARRACKS
RENOVATION................. .......... 6,200 +6,200
NAVY:
DAHLGREN NAVAL SURFACE
WARFARE CENTER: WEAPONS
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
LABORATORY ADDITION........ 5,130 5,130 ..............
DAM NECK TACTICAL TRAINING
GROUP (ATLANTIC): TRAINING
BUILDING ADDITION.......... 2,430 2,430 ..............
NORFOLK FLEET INDUSTRIAL
SUPPLY CENTER: FIRE STATION 1,770 1,770 ..............
NORFOLK FLEET TRAINING
CENTER: ENGINEERING
TRAINING FAC ADDITION AND
RENOVATION................. 5,700 5,700 ..............
NORFOLK NAVAL STATION:
BERTHING PIER (PHASE I).... 32,030 32,030 ..............
NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD
(PORTSMOUTH): DREDGING..... 6,180 6,180 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CHEATHAM ANNEX:
FLEET HOSPITAL SUPPORT
OFFICE--OPERATIONAL
WAREHOUSE.............. 9,400 9,400 ..............
FLEET HOSPITAL SUPPORT
OFFICE--ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICE................. 1,900 1,900 ..............
DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER
(RICHMOND): CONVERT
WAREHOUSE TO ADMINISTRATIVE
SPACE...................... 10,500 10,500 ..............
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL HOSPITAL:
HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE
X)......................... 17,954 17,954 ..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: POWHATAN:
READINESS CENTER............... 2,435 2,435 ..............
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT BELVOIR: US ARMY
RESERVE CENTER/
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE
SHOP/AREA MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT ACTIVITY........... 10,314 10,314 ..............
FORT EUSTIS: AVIATION
SUPPORT FACILITY........... 11,618 11,618 ..............
NAVY RESERVE: NORFOLK NAVAL AIR
RESERVE CENTER: HANGAR ALTERA-
TIONS.......................... 1,660 1,660 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA........... 201,752 212,602 +10,850
=======================================
WASHINGTON
ARMY:
FORT LEWIS:
CENTRAL VEHICLE WASH
FACILITY............... 4,650 4,650 ..............
CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL
TRAINER BUILDING....... 7,600 7,600 ..............
CONSOLIDATED FUEL
FACILITY............... 3,950 3,950 ..............
TANK TRAIL EROSION
MITIGATION (YAKIMA).... 2,000 2,000 ..............
NAVY:
BREMERTON STRATEGIC WEAPONS
FACILITY (PACIFIC):
SECURITY FACILITY UPGRADES. 2,750 2,750 ..............
PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD
(BREMERTON): COMMUNITY
SUPPORT FACILITY........... .......... 4,300 +4,300
AIR FORCE:
FAIRCHILD AFB:
KC-135 SQUADRON
OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINT UNIT............. 7,620 7,620 ..............
SURVIVAL ACADEMIC
TRAINING SUPPORT CENTER .......... 3,900 +3,900
MCCHORD AFB:
C-17 ADD/ALTER AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE SHOP....... 2,321 2,321 ..............
C-17 ADD/ALTER SIMULATOR
FACILITY............... 1,823 1,823 ..............
C-17 ADD/ALTER AEROSPACE
GROUND EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE FACILITY... 2,110 2,110 ..............
C-17 ALTER COMPOSITE
SHOP................... 1,630 1,630 ..............
C-17 ALTER MAINTENANCE
HANGARS................ 6,427 6,427 ..............
C-17 FLIGHTLINE SUPPORT
FACILITY............... 4,029 4,029 ..............
C-17 LIFE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT FACILITY..... 4,413 4,413 ..............
C-17 RAMP/HYDRANT FUELS
SYSTEM................. 18,025 18,025 ..............
C-17 REPAIR BASE ROADS.. 2,224 2,224 ..............
C-17 SHORTFIELD ASSAULT
STRIP.................. 2,321 2,321 ..............
C-17 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
UNIT................... 6,524 6,524 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BANGOR NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE:
DISEASE VECTOR ECOLOGY AND
CONTROL CENTER............. 5,700 5,700 ..............
BREMERTON NAVAL HOSPITAL:
ADD/ALTER HOSPITAL......... 28,000 28,000 ..............
MCCHORD AFB: CLINIC/WAR
READINESS MATERIAL WAREHSE
REPLACEMENT................ 20,000 20,000 ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MCCHORD AFB:
CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL TRAINING
FACILITY....................... .......... 3,400 +3,400
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FAIRCHILD
AFB: COMPOSITE SUPPORT COMPLEX. .......... 9,800 +9,800
ARMY RESERVE: FORT LAWTON: USAR/
OMS/MEP, PH II................. .......... 10,713 +10,713
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON......... 134,117 166,230 +32,113
=======================================
WEST VIRGINIA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP DAWSON (KINGWOOD):
READINESS CENTER........ 4,465 .......... -4,465
REGIONAL TRAINING
INSTITUTE.............. .......... 13,595 +13,595
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA.. 4,465 13,595 +9,130
=======================================
WISCONSIN
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: VOLK FIELD
(CAMP DOUGLAS): UPGRADE RUNWAY
AND TAXIWAY.................... 9,600 9,600 ..............
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT MCCOY:
CRASH RESCUE STATION.... 1,850 1,850 ..............
MACHINE GUN RANGE....... 2,032 2,032 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WISCONSIN...... 13,482 13,482 ..............
=======================================
WYOMING
AIR FORCE: F.E. WARREN AFB:
ALTER DORMITORIES.............. .......... 3,850 +3,850
=======================================
CONUS CLASSIFIED
ARMY: CLASSIFIED LOCATIONS:
CLASSIFIED PROJECT............. 4,600 4,600 ..............
BELGIUM
ARMY: BELGIUM: CHILD DEVELOPMENT
CENTER......................... 6,300 6,300 ..............
=======================================
GERMANY
ARMY:
CONN BARRACKS (SCHWEINFURT):
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX RE-
NEWAL...................... 18,000 18,000 ..............
KITZINGEN FAMILY HOUSING
(WUERZBURG): CHILD
DEVELOPMENT CEN- TER...... 4,250 4,250 ..............
AIR FORCE:
SPANGDAHLEM AB:
CONSOLIDATED AIR CONTROL
SQUADRON OPERATIONS FAC 4,466 .......... -4,466
DORMITORY............... 9,501 9,501 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY........ 36,217 31,751 -4,466
=======================================
GREECE
NAVY: SOUDA BAY CRETE NAVAL
SUPPORT ACTIVITY: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS.............. 5,260 5,260 ..............
=======================================
GUAM
NAVY:
NAVAL ACTIVITIES (GUAM):
SPECIAL WARFARE UNIT
FACILITY............... 5,500 5,500 ..............
WATERFRONT CONSOLIDATION
FACILITIES............. 4,810 4,810 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
NAVAL ACTIVITIES (GUAM):
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDITION AND RENOVATION 8,600 8,600 ..............
HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND
CONVERSION............. 4,500 4,500 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM........... 23,410 23,410 ..............
=======================================
ITALY
NAVY: NAPLES NAVAL SUPPORT
ACTIVITY: PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
(CAPODICHINO).................. 18,270 18,270 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: SIGONELLA NAVAL
AIR STATION: FLIGHT LINE
DISPENSARY..................... 5,300 5,300 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY.............. 23,570 23,570 ..............
=======================================
KOREA
ARMY:
CAMP CASEY:
WHOLE BARRACKS COMPLEX
RENEWAL................ 13,400 13,400 ..............
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER. .......... 8,000 +8,000
CAMP CASTLE: WHOLE BARRACKS
COMPLEX RENEWAL............ 18,226 18,226 ..............
CAMP HUMPHREYS: WHOLE
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL... 8,500 8,500 ..............
CAMP STANLEY: WHOLE BARRACKS
COMPLEX RENEWAL............ 5,800 5,800 ..............
AIR FORCE:
KUNSAN AB: DORMITORY........ 5,958 5,958 ..............
OSAN AB: DORMITORY.......... 7,496 7,496 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA.............. 59,380 67,380 +8,000
=======================================
KWAJALEIN
ARMY: KWAJALEIN ATOLL: POWER
PLANT (ROI NAMUR ISLAND) (PHASE
I)............................. 12,600 .......... -12,600
DEFENSE-WIDE: MISSILE RANGE:
MULTI PURPOSE MISSILE TEST
FACILITIES..................... 4,600 .......... -4,600
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, KWAJALEIN.......... 17,200 .......... -17,200
=======================================
PORTUGAL
DEFENSE-WIDE: LAJES FIELD
(AZORES): FUEL PUMPHOUSE AND
TANKS.......................... 7,700 7,700 ..............
=======================================
PUERTO RICO
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BUCHANAN: ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL..................... 8,805 8,805 ..............
ROOSEVELT ROADS NAVAL
STATION: OPERATIONS
FACILITY................... 9,600 9,600 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, PUERTO RICO........ 18,405 18,405 ..............
=======================================
TURKEY
AIR FORCE: INCIRLIK AB: CENTRAL
SECURITY CONTROL FACILITY...... 2,949 2,949 ..............
=======================================
UNITED KINGDOM
NAVY: ST MAWGAN JOINT MARITIME
COMMUNICATION CENTER: EDUCATION
CENTER ADDITION................ 2,010 2,010 ..............
AIR FORCE:
RAF LAKENHEATH: DORMITORIES
(2)........................ 15,838 15,838 ..............
RAF MILDENHALL:
DORMITORY............... 10,926 10,926 ..............
KC-135 SQUADRON
OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINT UNIT............. 14,034 14,034 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: RAF LAKENHEATH:
HOSPITAL ANNEX REPLACEMENT..... 10,800 10,800 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM..... 53,608 53,608 ..............
=======================================
NATO
NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 185,000 152,600 -32,400
WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED
ARMY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
HOST NATION SUPPORT..... 20,450 20,450 ..............
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 41,819 46,819 +5,000
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 10,000 15,000 +5,000
NAVY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 58,346 62,146 +3,800
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 8,900 10,100 +1,200
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 7,135 10,135 +3,000
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 35,592 39,522 +3,930
DEFENSE-WIDE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
ENERGY CONSERVATION
INVESTMENT PROGRAM..... 46,950 46,950 ..............
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION 9,390 5,000 -4,390
PLANNING AND DESIGN:
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND............ 1,450 4,150 +2,700
DEF THREAT REDUCTION/
TREATY COMPLIANCE
AGENCY............. 100 100 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION....... 12,561 9,061 -3,500
DOD DEPENDENT
SCHOOLS............ .......... 1,000 +1,000
DEFENSE LEVEL
ACTIVITIES......... 2,200 2,200 ..............
DEFENSE MEDICAL
SUPPORT ACTIVITY... 8,555 8,555 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PLANNING
AND DESIGN....... 24,866 25,066 +200
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION:
SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND................ 4,200 1,500 -2,700
DEFENSE FINANCE AND
ACCOUNTING SERVICE..... 1,500 1,500 ..............
DEF THREAT REDUCTION/
TREATY COMPLIANCE
AGENCY................. 900 900 ..............
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF... 3,595 3,595 ..............
DOD DEPENDENT SCHOOLS... 999 999 ..............
DEFENSE MEDICAL SUPPORT
ACTIVITY............... 1,900 1,900 ..............
DEFENSE MANPOWER AND
PERSONNEL CENTER....... 15,000 15,000 ..............
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES 3,000 3,000 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED
MINOR CONSTRUCTION... 31,094 28,394 -2,700
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 4,548 15,401 +10,853
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 546 8,546 +8,000
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 8,549 10,049 +1,500
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 3,462 7,962 +4,500
ARMY RESERVE: UNSPECIFIED
WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: PLANNING
AND DE- SIGN.................. 7,368 7,368 ..............
NAVY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 1,974 1,974 ..............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 877 877 ..............
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN..... 2,432 2,432 ..............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION........... 2,903 2,903 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE
UNSPECIFIED.......... 327,201 367,094 +39,893
=======================================
WORLDWIDE VARIOUS
DEFENSE-WIDE: VARIOUS LOCATIONS:
CONFORMING STORAGE FACILITIES
(CAMP LEJEUNE, NC)............. 1,300 1,300 ..............
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY
ALABAMA: REDSTONE ARSENAL (118
UNITS)......................... 14,000 14,000 ..............
HAWAII: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS (64
UNITS)......................... 14,700 14,700 ..............
NORTH CAROLINA: FORT BRAGG (170
UNITS)......................... 19,800 19,800 ..............
TEXAS: FORT HOOD (154 UNITS).... 21,600 21,600 ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS....... 28,629 49,679 +21,050
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 6,350 6,350 ..............
GENERAL REDUCTION............... -1,639 -1,639 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 103,440 124,490 +21,050
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
INTEREST PAYMENTS........... 3 3 ..............
LEASING..................... 202,155 202,155 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT....... 415 415 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 467,914 467,914 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........... 250,407 250,407 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT............ 52,222 52,222 ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.......... 87,125 87,125 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT......... 44,492 44,492 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE.............. 1,104,733 1,104,733 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING,
ARMY..................... 1,208,173 1,229,223 +21,050
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE
CORPS
CALIFORNIA: LEMOORE NAVAL AIR
STATION (162 UNITS)............ 30,379 30,379 ..............
HAWAII: PEARL HARBOR PUBLIC
WORKS CENTER (150 UNITS)....... 29,125 29,125 ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS....... 211,991 217,791 +5,800
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 15,618 15,618 ..............
GENERAL REDUCTION............... -6,323 -6,323 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 280,790 286,590 +5,800
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 414,967 414,967 ..............
LEASING..................... 135,079 135,079 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT....... 293 293 ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.......... 82,331 82,331 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT......... 33,199 33,199 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........... 184,519 184,519 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT............ 64,829 64,829 ..............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS. 76 76 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE.............. 915,293 915,293 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING,
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.... 1,196,083 1,201,883 +5,800
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE
ALABAMA: MAXWELL AFB (143 UNITS) 16,300 16,300 ..............
ALASKA: EIELSON AFB (46 UNITS).. 12,932 12,932 ..............
CALIFORNIA:
EDWARDS AFB (48 UNITS)...... 12,580 12,580 ..............
VANDENBERG AFB (95 UNITS)... 18,499 18,499 ..............
DELAWARE: DOVER AFB (55 UNITS).. 8,998 8,998 ..............
FLORIDA:
MACDILL AFB (48 UNITS)...... 7,609 7,609 ..............
PATRICK AFB (46 UNITS)...... 9,692 9,692 ..............
TYNDALL AFB (122 UNITS)..... 14,500 14,500 ..............
MISSISSIPPI:
KEESLER AFB (52 UNITS)...... .......... 6,800 +6,800
COLUMBUS AFB (52 UNITS)..... .......... 6,800 +6,800
MONTANA: MALMSTROM AFB (62
UNITS)......................... .......... 12,300 +12,300
NEBRASKA:
OFFUTT AFB (HOUSING
MAINTENANCE FACILITY)...... 900 900 ..............
OFFUTT AFB (HOUSING OFFICE). 870 870 ..............
OFFUTT AFB (90 UNITS)....... 12,212 12,212 ..............
NEW JERSEY:..................... .......... .......... ..............
NEW MEXICO: KIRTLAND AFB (37
UNITS)......................... 6,400 6,400 ..............
OHIO: WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB (40
UNITS)......................... 5,600 5,600 ..............
TEXAS:
DYESS AFB (64 UNITS)........ 9,415 9,415 ..............
SHEPPARD AFB (115 UNITS).... .......... 12,800 +12,800
WASHINGTON:
FAIRCHILD AFB (HOUSING
OFFICE/MAINTENANCE
FACILITY).................. 1,692 1,692 ..............
FAIRCHILD AFB (14 UNITS).... 2,300 2,300 ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS....... 81,778 118,018 +36,240
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 11,342 11,342 ..............
GENERAL REDUCTION............... -7,584 -11,084 -3,500
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 226,035 297,475 +71,440
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS. 32 32 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 388,659 388,659 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT....... 5,240 5,240 ..............
LEASING..................... 118,071 118,071 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT......... 37,218 37,218 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........... 152,214 152,214 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT............ 36,066 36,066 ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.......... 52,495 52,495 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE.............. 789,995 789,995 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR
FORCE.................... 1,016,030 1,087,470 +71,440
=======================================
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (NSA)
(MENWITH HILL, UNITED KINGDOM)
(27 UNITS)..................... 50 50 ..............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (DLA)
(RICHMOND, VA CARPORTS AND
SHELTERS; LATHROP, CA FENCING). 295 295 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.... 345 345 ..............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA)... 126 126 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA)... 2,153 2,153 ..............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA)... 125 125 ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA).... 70 70 ..............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA).... 244 244 ..............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA). 735 735 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA)...... 355 355 ..............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA)...... 51 51 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA)..... 450 450 ..............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA)..... 424 424 ..............
LEASING (NSA)............... 12,292 12,292 ..............
LEASING (DIA)............... 18,847 18,847 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY
(NSA)...................... 496 496 ..............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY
(DLA)...................... 531 531 ..............
---------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE.............. 36,899 36,899 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING,
DEFENSE-WIDE............. 37,244 37,244 ..............
=======================================
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND....... 7,000 7,000 ..............
=======================================
HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND
HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND...... 12,800 12,800 ..............
=======================================
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART III
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART III.............. 433,464 433,464 ..............
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART IV
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART IV............... 1,297,240 1,297,240 ..............
---------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASE REALIGNMENT
AND CLOSURE.............. 1,730,704 1,730,704 ..............
=======================================
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 126 (FAMILY HOUSING,
PAINE FIELD)................... 6,000 6,000 ..............
=======================================
GRAND TOTAL............... 7,784,074 8,480,574 +696,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------