[Senate Report 105-176]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 348
105th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 105-176
_______________________________________________________________________
PETROGLYPH NATIONAL MONUMENT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT ACT
_______
April 29, 1998.--Ordered to be printed
_______________________________________________________________________
Mr. Murkowski, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
[To accompany S. 633]
The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was
referred the bill (S. 633) to amend the Petroglyph National
Monument Establishment Act of 1990 to adjust the boundary of
the monument, and for other purposes, having considered the
same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and
recommends that the bill, as amended, do pass.
The amendment is as follows:
Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu
thereof the following:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This act may be cited as the ``Petroglyph National Monument
Boundary Adjustment Act''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that--
(1) the purposes for which Petroglyph National Monument
(hereinafter ``the monument'') was established continue to be
valid;
(2) it is of mutual benefit to the trustee institutions of
the New Mexico State Trust lands and the National Park Service
for land exchange negotiations to be completed with all due
diligence, resulting in the transfer of all State Trust lands
within the boundaries of the monument to the United States in
accordance with State and Federal law;
(3) because the city of Albuquerque has acquired substantial
acreage within the monument boundaries, purchased with State
and municipal funds, the consolidation of land ownership and
jurisdiction under the National Park Service will require the
consent of the city of Albuquerque, and options for National
Park Service acquisition that are not currently available;
(4) corridors for the development of Paseo del Norte and
Unser Boulevard are depicted on the map referred to in section
102(a) of the Petroglyph National Monument Establishment Act of
1990 (Public Law 101-313; 16 U.S.C. 431 note), and the
alignment of the roadways was anticipated by Congress before
the date of enactment of the Act;
(5) it was the expectation of the principal proponents of
Petroglyph National Monument, including the cities of
Albuquerque and Rio Rancho, New Mexico, and the National Park
Service, that passage of the Petroglyph National Monument
Establishment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-313; 16 U.S.C 431
note) would allow the city of Alburquerque--
(A) to utilize the Paseo del Norte and Unser
Boulevard corridors through the monument; and
(B) to design and construct infrastructure within the
corridors with the cultural and natural resources of
the monument in mind;
(6) the city of albuquerque has not provided for the
establishment of rights-of-way for the Paseo del Norte and
Unser Boulevard corridors under the Joint Powers Agreement
(PANO 78-521.81-277A), which expanded the boundary of the
monument to include the Piedras Marcadas and Boca Negra units,
pursuant to section 104 of the Petroglyph National Monument
Establishment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-313; 16 U.S.C. 431
note);
(7) adequate planning and cooperation between the city of
Albuquerque and the National Park Service is essential to avoid
resource degradation within the monument resulting from storm
water runoff, and that drainage conveyances through the
monument should be designed and located to provide sufficient
capacity for effective runoff management; and
(8) Petroglyph National Monument will be best managed for the
benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations with
cooperation between the city of Albuquerque, the State of New
Mexico, and the National Park Service.
SEC. 3. STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.
(a) Storm Water Drainage.--Within 180 days of enactment of this
section, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of
the National Park Service, or a designee thereof, and the city of
Albuquerque, New Mexico, shall enter into negotiations to provide for
the management of storm water runoff and drainage within the monument,
including the design and construction of any storm water corridors,
conveyances, and easements within the monument boundaries.
(b) Technical Assistance.--At least 120 days before the initiation
of any construction within the corridor described in Exhibit B of the
document referred to in subsection (c), the city of Albuquerque, New
Mexico, shall provide to the Secretary of the Interior, acting through
the Director of the National Park Service, design specifications of the
construction project. Prior to, or upon receipt of such specifications,
the Secretary, or a designee thereof, may provide the city with
technical assistance in the design of any construction project within
such corridor. Technical assistance provided by the Secretary shall be
solely to advise the city on design.
(c) Document.--The document described in this section is the
document entitled ``Petroglyph National Monument Roadway/Utility
Corridors'', on file with the Secretary of the Interior and the mayor
of the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico.
SEC. 4. ACQUISITION AUTHORITY; BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT; ADMINISTRATION AND
MANAGEMENT OF THE MONUMENT.
(a) Acquisition Authority.--Section 103(a) of the Petroglyph
National Monument Establishment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-313, 16
U.S.C. 431 note) is amended by striking ``, exceptthat lands or
interests therein owned by the State or a political subdivision thereof
may be acquired only by donation or exchange'', and inserting in lieu
thereof'': Provided, That no lands or interests therein owned by the
State or a political subdivision thereof may be acquired by, purchase
prior to--
``(1) the State or political subdivision thereof holding
title to such land identifying it for disposal; and
``(2) either--
``(A) the acquisition of all private land within the
monument boundary for which there is a willing seller;
or
``(B) two years after a final offer (for which funds
are available) is made by the Secretary to acquire all
remaining private land, at fair market value.''.
(b) Boundary Adjustment.--Section 104(a) of the Petroglyph National
Monument Establishment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-313; 16 U.S.C. 431
note) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs
(A) and (B), respectively, and indenting appropriately;
(2) by striking ``(a) Upon'' and inserting the following:
``(a)(1) Upon''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(2)(A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), effective as of the
date of enactment of this subparagraph--
``(i) the boundary of the monument is adjusted to
exclude the Paseo Del Norte corridor in the Piedras
Marcadas Unit described in Exhibit B of the document
described in subparagraph (B); and
``(ii) the prior inclusion of the Paseo Del Norte
corridor within the boundary of the monument shall have
no effect on any future ownership, use, management of
such corridor.
``(B) The document described in this subparagraph is the
document entitled ``Petroglyph National Monument Roadway/
Utility Corridors,'' on file with the Secretary of the Interior
and the mayor of the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico.''.
(c) Administration and Management of the Monument.--Section 105 of
the Petroglyph National Monument Establishment Act of 1990 (Public Law
101-313, 16 U.S.C. 431 note) is amended by adding the following new
subsection--
``(f) In the event that the binding agreement providing for the
expansion of the monument pursuant to section 104 is amended, in
accordance with the terms of the agreement, such that responsibility
for operation, maintenance and repair of any or all property within the
Boca Negra or Piedras Marcadas units of the monument if transferred to
the National Park Service, the Secretary may employ, at a comparable
grade and salary within the National Park Service, any willing
employees of the city assigned to those units.''
SEC. 5. DOUBLE EAGLE II AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD.
The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall
allow the use of the existing access road to the Double Eagle II
Airport for visitor access to the monument.
Purpose of the Measure
The purpose of S. 633 is to amend the Petroglyph National
Monument Establishment Act of 1990 to exclude the 8\1/2\-acre
Paseo del Norte road corridor from the monument boundaries.
Background and Need
Petroglyph National Monument (Monument) is located west of
Albuquerque, New Mexico and was established by Public Law 101-
313 on June 27, 1990. The Monument contains more than 15,000
prehistoric and historic Native American and Hispanic
petroglyphs (which are images carved on rocks). These artifacts
date back as far as 12,000 years and are situated generally
along a 17 mile escarpment on Albuquerque's West Mesa. The
Monument is comprised of 671 federal and 4,517 non-federal
acres and is managed jointly between the National Park Service
(NPS), the State of New Mexico (State) and the City of
Albuquerque (city).
In accordance with the Monument's enabling legislation the
NPS, city and State entered into a joint powers agreement under
which the NPS managed the Atrisco Unit in the southern end of
the Monument, while the State-owned Boca Negra Unit and the
city-owned Piedras Marcada Unit would be managed by the city
pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement. The Atrisco Unit is
still directly managed by the NPS.
Over the years, residential development has grown at the
north end of the Monument, but some believe development has
been hampered because the Monument imposes a barrier to
vehicular traffic between Albuquerque and proposed western
suburbs. Proponents of S. 633 contend that Petroglyph National
Monument was intended to be an urban park and that a
transportation corridor known as Paseo Del Norte was always
intended to transect the Monument to link Albuquerque with any
future western neighborhood growth. Opponents of the
legislation are concerned that the Paseo Del Norte, if
developed, would damage artifacts and sever the continuity of
the Monument. Certain Native American groups maintain that
development of the road corridor would degrade the importance
of a culturally significant area.
In the Spring of 1992, the city issued the draft Unser
Middle Transportation Corridor Study Environmental Impact
Statement, with a public hearing in April of 1992. The final
EIS was released November, 1992. Among its contents were
provisions for realignment of Unser Boulevard (which currently
runs through the Monument), and for development of Paseo Del
Norte road corridor, which would transect the Monument for
about 1270 feet at a narrow point in the Monument, north of the
Unser Boulevard Crossing.
In June 1992, the Albuquerque City Council approved the
final EIS with a provision that road construction through the
Monument could not begin until the City Attorney indicated ``no
credible legal barriers'' prevented such construction.
During the public review stage of the EIS, the NPS had
recommended three alternative routes for Paseo Del Norte that
would not transect the Monument, but would contour the route
around the north boundary. The NPS did not oppose the
realignment of Unser Boulevard.
The NPS has opposed the Paseo Del Norte route because it
does not facilitate ``park purposes.'' Conversely, the NPS has
taken the position that the Unser Boulevard route (and its
proposed realignment route) does promote park purposes. One of
the NPS alternative routes to Paseo Del Norte, called the
Calabacillas alternative, accomplished the same transportation
purposes as Paseo Del Norte from the NPS perspective, but is
considered economically impracticable by the city. The northern
routes are also resisted by many who live in neighborhoods
north of the Monument, who feel the increased traffic will have
negative effects on their neighborhoods.
S. 366 would also allow the City of Albuquerque to either
construct Paseo del Norte through the Monument or not,
depending on local preference and would withdraw the corridor
from Monument boundaries. According to the Middle Unser
Transportation Corridor Study, Final Environmental Impact
Statement, the Paseo Del Norte Middle Alignment will directly
impact no petroglyphs within the right of way. The study notes
``potential impacts'' of up to 330, with the majority of those
(over 260), outside of the right of way.
Legislative History
S. 633 was introduced by Senator Domenici on April 23, 1997
and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The Subcommittee on National Parks, Historic Preservation, and
Recreation held a hearing on S. 633 on October 23, 1997.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, in open
business session on March 12, 1998, by voice vote of a quorum
present, recommendsthat the Senate pass S. 633, if amended as
described herein.
Committee Amendment
During the consideration of S. 633, the Committee adopted
an amendment in the nature of substitute, which added
provisions affecting storm water damage, technical assistance,
acquisition authority, boundary adjustment, management and the
Double Eagle II Airport Access Road.
Specifically, the amendment directs the NPS and the city of
begin negotiations on the management of storm water drainage
through the Monument; directs the city of submit design
specifications for projects in the Paseo del Norte corridor to
the National Park service, and allows the NPS to provide
technical assistance, in an advisory capacity, in the design of
the projects; authorizes the Park Service to purchase land
acquired by the city, if the city agrees, and the NPS first
acquires the remaining private land within the Monument; amends
section 104(a) of the Petroglyph National Monument Established
Act of 1990, adjusting the boundary of the Monument to exclude
the corridor for the possible extension of Paseo del Norte;
provides that if the Park Service assumes management for
additional units in the monument, that city employees could be
hired by the Park Service; and provides for the use of the FAA
road to Double Eagle II Airport to be used to improve access to
the west side of the monument.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 1 designates the short title as the ``Petroglyph
National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act''.
Section 2 presents Congressional findings as noted in the
six following paragraphs:
Paragraph (1) reaffirming that the purposes for which
the Monument was established continue to be valid;
Paragraph (2) states that the Monument will best be
managed under a cooperative relationship between the
city, the State and the NPS;
Paragraph (3) states that the consolidation of land
ownership under the jurisdiction of the National Park
Service will require the consent of the city. However,
options for the acquisition of City and State owned
lands are not currently available.
Paragraph (4) states that the corridors for Under
Boulevard and Paseo del Norte were anticipated by
Congress before enactment of the Monument;
Paragraph (5) states that it was the intent of the
principal proponents of the Monument to allow the city
to utilize the Paseo del Norte and Under Boulevard
corridors through the Monument and to coordinate
construction with protection of natural and cultural
resources of the Monument;
Paragraph (6) finds that the city has not provided for
the establishment of rights-of-way for Paseo del Norte
and Under Boulevard under the Joint Powers Agreement
which expanded Petroglyph National Monument.
Section 3 directs the NPS and the city, within 180 days of
enactment of this section, to enter into negotiations to
provide for the management of storm water runoff and drainage
within the Monument. Directs the city to provide the NPS design
specifications of the construction project at least 120 days
before beginning construction. The NPS may provide the city
technical assistance in the design of the construction project.
The section further describes the document described in this
section as the ``Petroglyph National Monument Roadway/Utility
Corridors''.
Section 4 amends section 103(a) of the Petroglph National
Monument Act to authorize the NPS to purchase lands owned by
the State or the city, but not prior to such lands being
identified for disposal, and not until either the acquisition
of all private land from willing sellers takes place or until
two years after a final officer is made by the NPS to acquire
the remaining private lands at fair market value, whichever
occurs first.
The section also adjusts the boundary of the Monument to
exclude the Paseo Del Norte corridor in the Piedras Macadam
Unit and directs that the corridor be managed as if it had
never been within the boundary of the Monument.
Finally, in the event that the Boca Negra or Piedras
Marcadas units are transferred to the NPS, the Service may
employ any willing employees of the city, assigned to those
sites, at a comparable grade and salary.
Section 5 directs the Federal Aviation Administration to
allow the use of the existing access road to the Double Eagle
II Airport for visitor access to the monument.
Cost and Budgetary Considerations
The following estimate of costs of this measure has been
provided by the Congressional Budget Office:
U.S. Congress,
Congressional Budget Office,
Washington, DC, April 2, 1998.
Hon. Frank H. Murkowski,
Chairman, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,
U.S. Senate, Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Chairman. The Congressional Budget Office has
prepared the enclosed cost estimate for S. 633, the Petroglyph
National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act.
If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be
pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contacts for this
estimate are Deborah Reis (for federal costs) and Marjorie
Miller (for the state and local impact).
Sincerely,
James L. Blum,
(for June E. O'Neill, Director).
Enclosure.
congressional budget office cost estimate
S. 633--Petroglyph National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act
S. 633 would authorize the National Park Service (NPS) to
purchase state- and city-owned land within the boundaries of
Petroglyph National Monument in New Mexico. Under existing law,
land within the monument that is owned by state or local
governments may only be acquired by donation or exchange. The
bill also would remove from the monument's boundaries about 8.5
acres of land owned by the city of Albuquerque. Finally, the
bill would give the NPS 180 days to begin negotiations with the
city to address problems involving storm water runoff within
the monument.
Assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO
estimates that implementing S. 633 would cost the federal
government between $40 million and $90 million over the next
three or four years. Most of the potential costs would be for
acquiring up to nearly 4,300 acres of land. The land
acquisition costs are very uncertain because they depend on the
future decisions of the NPS, the state of New Mexico, and the
city of Albuquerque. Assuming that the NPS decides--under S.
633--that it must acquire all land owned by the city and state,
and that those governments are not willing to donate any of the
property, the federal government would likely spend between $30
million and $70 million to buy up to 4,000 acres of public
land. (CBO expects that another 640 acres of state trust lands
and several tracts of city property would probably be exchanged
for federal land under existing authority.) In addition, the
NPS would probably but about 300 acres of private land within
the two units of the monument that the city and state currently
manage, at a cost of $10 million to $20 million. The city and
state were planning to purchase this acreage, but it is
unlikely that they would do so if the NPS assumes their
management responsibilities.
The wide range of possible costs reflects the difficulty of
valuing public recreational land and of predicting future
negotiations between the sellers and buyer. On the one hand, it
is possible that the city and state would be willing to sell
their land for what they have spent to date (about $30 million)
or donate some holdings. On the other hand, it is possible that
the sellers would insist on a price that reflects their
property's current market value, which would be difficult to
establish for public park land. This estimate is based on
information providedby the NPS, state and city officials, and
other affected parties. Other provisions of the bill would have no
impact on the federal budget.
Enacting S. 633 would not affect direct spending or
receipts; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would not apply.
S. 633 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates
as defined in Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 and would
impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. As
explained above, CBO estimates that the state of New Mexico and
the city of Albuquerque together would receive between $30
million and $70 million for the sale of lands to the National
Park Service, if the parties can agree on the terms of a sale
and if the necessary funds are appropriated. State and local
governments would also be affected by the provision removing
the Paseo del Norte corridor from the monument. This provision
would facilitate the construction of a new roadway through this
corridor, but the decision to build such a roadway would be
left to state and local authorities.
The CBO staff contacts for this estimate are Deborah Reis
(for federal costs), and Marjorie Miller (for the state and
local impact). This estimate was approved by Robert A.
Sunshine, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.
Regulatory Impact Evaluation
In compliance with paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the
Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee makes the following
evaluation of the regulatory impact which would be incurred in
carrying out S. 633. The bill is not a regulatory measure in
the sense of imposing Government-established standards or
significant economic responsibilities on private individuals
and businesses.
No personal information would be collected in administering
the program. Therefore, there would be no impact on personal
privacy.
Little, if any, additional paperwork would result from
enactment of S. 633, as ordered reported.
Executive Communications
On March 11, 1998, the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources requested legislative reports from the Department of
the Interior and the Office of Management and Budget setting
forth Executive agency recommendations on S. 633. These reports
had not been received at the time the report on S. 633 was
filed. When these reports become available, the Chairman will
request that they be printed in the Congressional Record for
the advice of the Senate. The testimony of the Department of
the Interior at the Subcommittee hearing follows:
Statement by Denis P. Galvin, Deputy Director, National Park Service,
Department of the Interior
Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for
the opportunity to appear before you to address S. 633, the
``Petroglyph National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act.'' S.
633, if enacted, would remove approximately 8.5 acres of land
from within the present boundary of Petroglyph National
Monument in order to facilitate the construction of a four to
six-lane extension of an arterial roadway, known as the Paseo
del Norte. We are strongly opposed to the passage of this
legislation. Should the bill, as currently written, be passed
by Congress, the Secretary will recommend a Presidential veto.
Petroglyph National Monument was established by Congress in
1990 to preserve and protect over 15,000 historic and
prehistoric petroglyphs (rock drawings) and other significant
natural and cultural resources. It was the first National Park
System area specifically established to protect and interpret
petroglyphs and their setting. The monument, which encompasses
approximately 7,000 acres on the west side of Albuquerque, New
Mexico, is dominated by the West Mesa. The West Mesa was
created by volcanic eruptions and lava flows 110,000 years ago
and serves as a backdrop or canvas for the monument's cultural
resources. Nearly 400 archaeological sites on the mesa top and
along the base of the black volcanic escarpment preserve the
story of prehistoric and historic habitation of the Rio Grande
Valley. The lands within the monument remain culturally
significant to the Pueblo community. Petroglyph National
Monument was established to help protect these vulnerable
cultural and natural resources from vandalism and urbanization,
and to provide for their interpretation and enjoyment for
present and future generations.
Any use, including construction, within a unit of the
National Park system must be consistent with and serve park
purposes according to the National Park Service Organic Act.
Furthermore, any such use cannot be in derogation of the
resources for which the monument was established, except as may
have been or shall be directly and specifically provided by
Congress. Although section 2 of S. 633 states that it was the
intent of Congress to utilize the Paseo del Norte corridor
through the monument, the official hearing transcripts,
committee reports and public law establishing the monument make
no reference to the construction of any roadway along the Paseo
del Norte corridor. No legitimate park purpose exists for the
50 m.p.h. freeway-type extension route of Paseo del Norte
across Petroglyph National Monument.
The proposed route for the Paseo del Norte extension would
cross a portion of culturally significant land designated as a
National Register district, and would disturb lands that have
not been previously disturbed, and would intrude on the quality
of the visitor experience to portions of the Piedras Marcadas
Canyon by affecting the natural quiet of the inner canyon.
The stated purpose for Paseo del Norte is to provide
improved transportation service on the west side of Albuquerque
and to relieve existing and future traffic congestion on
present roads. Based on this rationale, the National Park
Service has consistently oposed the road as presently planned.
The current proposed extension route of Paseo del Norte across
the monument serves no monument or visitor-related purpose and
will damage the monument's overall integrity. As is noted in
the monument's general management plan, the National Park
Service, the state historic preservation officer, the state
attorney general, and numerous other national and local groups
have recognized the monument's resources would be significantly
impacted.
No Federal funds are proposed for construction of the Paseo
del Norte, however, we note that section 4(f) of the Department
of Transportation Act of 1966 states a policy that ``special
effort should be made to preserve the natural beauty of the
countryside and public park and recreation lands; wildlife and
waterfowl refuges, and historic sites.'' If Federal funds are
requested for this project, section 4(f) would require the
Department of Transportation to determine whether there is no
feasible and prudent alternative and that the program includes
all possible planning to minimize harm to the resources
protected by the statute. This protection applies to properties
of historic significance, which is a technical determination
based on the historic attributes of the sites and the historic
structures.
Removing land from an area that has been recognized as
important to this nation's heritage for construction of a
freeway or other use to accommodate strictly local needs
creates a precedent that could become costly within the context
of our National Park System. It sets us at odds with the
original intent for establishing these areas--the determination
that these resources are nationally significant.
That completes my remarks Mr. Chairman. I would be happy to
answer any questions that you may have.
Changes in Existing Law
In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the
Standing Rules of the Senate, changes in existing law made by
the bill S. 633, as ordered reported, are shown as follows
(existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black
brackets, new matter is printed in italic, existing law in
which no change is proposed is shown in roman);
(Public Law 101-313--June 27, 1990)
SEC. 103. LAND ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.
(a) The Secretary is authorized to acquire lands and
interests therein within the monument boundary by donation,
purchase with donated or appropriated funds, exchange, or
transfer from any other Federal agency[, except that lands or
interests therein owned by the State or a political subdivision
thereof may be acquired only by donation or exchange] Provided,
that no lands or interests therein owned by the State or a
political subdivision thereof may be acquired by purchase prior
to--
(1) the State or political subdivision thereof
holding title to such land identifying it for disposal:
and,
(2) either--
(A) the acquisition of all private land
within the monument boundary for which there is
a willing seller: or
(B) two years after a final offer (for which
funds are available) is made by the Secretary
to acquire all remaining private land, at fair
market value.
SEC. 104. EXPANSION OF THE MONUMENT.
[(a) Upon](a)(1) Upon the execution of a binding agreement
between the Secretary, the State, and the city that the lands
identified in this subsection shall be perpetually managed in
accordance with section 105, the Secretary shall include such
lands, totaling approximately 1,994 acres, within the monument
boundary. The lands referred to in this subsection are:
[(1)](A) the approximately 1,779 acres generally
known as the Piedras Macadam Unit, as depicted on the
map referred to in section 102(a); and
[(2)](B) the approximately 215 acres generally known
as the Boca Negro Unit, as depicted on the map referred
to in section 102(a).
(2)(A) Nothwithstanding paragraph (1), effective as of the
date of enactment of this subparagraph--
(i) the boundary of the monument is adjusted to
exclude the Paseo del Norte corridor in the Piedras
Macadam Unit described in Exhibit B of the document
described in subparagraph (B); and
(ii) the prior inclusion of the Paseo del Norte
corridor within the boundary of the monument shall have
no effect on any future ownership, use, or management
of such corridor.
(B) The document described in this subparagraph is the
document entitled `Petroglyph National Monument Roadway/Utility
Corridors', on file with the Secretary of the Interior and the
mayor of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 105. ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE MONUMENT
* * * * * * *
(f) In the event that the binding agreement providing for
the expansion of the monument pursuant to section 104 is
amended, in accordance with the terms of the agreement, such
that responsibility for operation, maintenance and repair of
any or all property within the Boca Negro or Piedras Macadam
units of the monument is transferred to the National Park
Service, the Secretary may employ, at a comparable grade and
salary within the National Park service, any willing employees
of the City assigned to those units.
* * * * * * *