[Senate Report 104-320]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



                                                       Calendar No. 496
104th Congress                                                   Report
                                 SENATE

   2d Session                                                   104-320
_______________________________________________________________________


 
         ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATION BILL, 1997

                                _______
                                

                 July 16, 1996.--Ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________


   Mr. Domenici, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                         [To accompany S. 1959]

    The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1959) 
making appropriations for energy and water development for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes, 
reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do 
pass.
    The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the 
bill (H.R. 0000) making appropriations for energy and water 
development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and 
for other purposes, reports the same to the Senate with 
amendments and recommends that the bill as amended do 
pass. deg.


Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 1997

Budget estimates considered by Senate................... $20,648,952,000
Amount of bill as reported to the Senate................  20,735,645,000
The bill as reported to the Senate--
    Over the budget estimate, 1997......................      86,693,000
    Over enacted bill, 1996.............................     799,991,000

                            C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              

                                TITLE I

Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
    Corps of Engineers--Civil:
                                                                   Page
        General investigations...................................     7
        Construction, general....................................    24
        Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries.........    41
        Operation and maintenance, general.......................    45
        Regulatory program.......................................    66
        Flood control and coastal emergencies....................    66
        Oilspill research........................................    67
        General expenses.........................................    67

                                TITLE II

Department of the Interior:
      Central Utah project completion account....................    69
    Bureau of Reclamation:
        General investigations...................................    69
        Construction Program.....................................    73
        Operation and maintenance................................    80
        Loan Program Account.....................................    81
        Central Valley project restoration fund..................    82
        General administrative expenses..........................    82

                               TITLE III

Department of Energy:
    Energy supply, research, and development activities..........    84
    Solar and renewable energy...................................    84
    Nuclear energy programs......................................    87
    Environment, safety, and health..............................    88
    Biological and environmental research........................    89
    Fusion Program...............................................    90
    Basic energy sciences........................................    90
    Other energy research programs...............................    91
    Energy support activities....................................    93
    Environmental restoration and waste management...............    94
    Uranium supply and enrichment activities.....................    95
    Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund..    96
    General science and research activities......................    96
    Nuclear waste disposal fund..................................    97
    Atomic energy defense activities.............................    98
    Weapons activities...........................................    98
    Defense environmental restoration and waste management.......   103
    Other defense activities.....................................   108
    Defense nuclear waste disposal...............................   112
    Departmental administration..................................   112
    Miscellaneous revenues.......................................   112
    Office of Inspector General..................................   113
    Power marketing administrations:
        Alaska Power Administration..............................   114
        Bonneville Power Administration fund.....................   115
        Southeastern Power Administration........................   118
        Southwestern Power Administration........................   118
        Western Area Power Administration........................   118
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.........................   119

                                TITLE IV

Independent Agencies:
    Appalachian Regional Commission..............................   140
    Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board......................   140
    Delaware River Basin Commission..............................   140
    Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.............   141
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission................................   141
    Office of Inspector General..................................   142
    Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.........................   142
    Susquehanna River Basin Commission...........................   142
    Tennessee Valley Authority...................................   143

                                TITLE V

General provisions...............................................   144
Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules 
  of the Senate..................................................   145
Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of 
  the Senate.....................................................   146
Budgetary impact statement.......................................   149
                                Purpose

    The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for 
the fiscal year 1997 beginning October 1, 1996, and ending 
September 30, 1997, for energy and water development, and for 
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources 
development programs and related activities of the Department 
of the Army, Civil Functions--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' 
Civil Works Program in title I; for the Department of the 
Interior's Bureau of Reclamation in title II; for the 
Department of Energy's energy research activities (except for 
fossil fuel programs and certain conservation and regulatory 
functions), including environmental restoration and waste 
management, and atomic energy defense activities in title III; 
and for related independent agencies and commissions, including 
the Appalachian Regional Commission and Appalachian regional 
development programs, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and 
the Tennessee Valley Authority in title IV.

                Summary of Estimates and Recommendations

    The fiscal year 1997 budget estimates for the bill total 
$20,648,952,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The 
recommendation of the Committee totals $20,735,645,000. This is 
$86,693,000 over the budget estimates and $799,991,000 over the 
enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year.

                     subcommittee budget allocation

    The Energy and Water Development Subcommittee allocation 
under section 602(b)(1) of the Budget Act totals $20,308,000 in 
budget authority and $20,202,000 in outlays for fiscal year 
1997. The bill as recommended by the Committee is within the 
subcommittee allocation for fiscal year 1997 in budget 
authority and outlays.

                            Bill Highlights

                    atomic energy defense activities

    The amount recommended in the bill includes $11,582,645,000 
for atomic energy defense activities. Major programs and 
activities include:

Stockpile stewardship...................................  $1,659,267,000
Stockpile management....................................   1,969,831,000
Verification and control technology.....................     470,248,000
Other defense programs..................................   1,136,585,000
Defense waste management and environmental restoration..   5,615,210,000

                energy supply, research, and development

    The bill recommended by the Committee provides a total of 
$2,749,043,000 for energy supply, research, development and 
demonstration programs including:

Solar and renewable energy..............................    $246,641,000
Environmental restoration and waste management 
    (nondefense)........................................     595,895,000
Nuclear fission R&D.....................................     229,734,000
Magnetic fusion.........................................     240,000,000
Basic energy sciences and other research................     863,438,000
Biological and environmental R&D........................     389,075,000

                      general science and research

    The Committee recommendation also provides a net 
appropriation of $1,000,626,000 for general science and 
research activities in life sciences, high energy physics, and 
nuclear physics. Major programs are:

High energy physics research............................    $672,921,000
Nuclear physics.........................................     318,425,000

               regulatory and other independent agencies

    Also recommended in the bill is $459,629,000 for various 
regulatory and independent agencies of the Federal Government. 
Major programs include:

Appalachian Regional Commission.........................    $165,000,000
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission....................     146,290,000
Nuclear Regulatory Commission...........................     471,800,000
Tennessee Valley Authority..............................     113,000,000

                      water resources development

General investigations..................................    $172,662,000
Construction............................................   1,478,316,000
Operations and maintenance..............................   1,981,234,000

Corps of Engineers, regulatory activities

                                                             101,000,000

    The Committee has also recommended appropriations totaling 
approximately $4,308,411,000 for Federal water resource 
development programs. This includes projects and related 
activities of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers--Civil and the 
Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior. The 
Federal water resource development program provides lasting 
benefits to the Nation in the area of flood control, municipal 
and industrial water supply, irrigation of agricultural lands, 
water conservation, commercial navigation, hydroelectric power, 
recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement.
    Water is our Nation's most precious and valuable resource. 
It is evident that water supply in the near future will be as 
important, if not more so, than energy. There is only so much 
water available. Water cannot be manufactured. Our Nation 
cannot survive without water, and economic prosperity cannot 
occur without a plentiful supply.
    While many areas of the country suffer from severe 
shortages of water, others suffer from the other extreme--an 
excess of water which threatens both rural and urban areas with 
floods. Because water is a national asset, and because the 
availability and control of water affect and benefit all States 
and jurisdictions, the Federal Government has historically 
assumed much of the responsibility for financing of water 
resource development.
    The existing national water resource infrastructure in 
America is an impressive system of dams, locks, harbors, 
canals, irrigation systems, reservoirs, and recreation sites 
with a central purpose--to serve the public's needs.
    Our waterways and harbors are an essential part of our 
national transportation system--providing clean, efficient, and 
economical transportation of fuels for energy generation and 
agricultural production, and making possible residential and 
industrial development to provide homes and jobs for the 
American people.
    Reservoir projects provide hydroelectric power production 
and downstream flood protection, make available recreational 
opportunities for thousands of urban residents, enhance fish 
and wildlife habitat, and provide our communities and 
industries with abundant and clean water supplies which are 
essential not only to life itself, but also to help maintain a 
high standard of living for the American people.
    When projects are completed, they make enormous 
contributions to America. The benefits derived from completed 
projects, in many instances, vastly exceed those contemplated 
during project development.

                         subcommittee hearings

    The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the 
Committee on Appropriations held three sessions in connection 
with the fiscal year 1997 appropriation bill. Witnesses 
included officials and representatives of the Federal agencies 
under the subcommittee's jurisdiction.
    In addition, the subcommittee received numerous statements 
and letters from Members of the U.S. Senate and House of 
Representatives, Governors, State and local officials and 
representatives, and hundreds of private citizens of all walks 
of life throughout the United States. Testimony, both for and 
against many items, was presented to the subcommittee. The 
recommendations for fiscal year 1997, therefore, have been 
developed after careful consideration of available data.

                         votes in the committee

    The subcommittee, by unanimous vote on July 11, 1996, 
recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the full 
Committee on Appropriations.
    By unanimous vote of 28 to 0 the Committee on July 16, 
1996, recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the 
Senate.
                 TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL

                         DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

                       Corps of Engineers--Civil

                         general investigations

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $121,767,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     142,500,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             154,557,000

    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:

                                                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS                                                       
                                                                  [Amounts in dollars]                                                                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                  Budget estimate            Committee recommendation   
Type of                   Project title                    Total Federal   Allocated to  ---------------------------------------------------------------
project                                                        cost            date       Investigations     Planning     Investigations     Planning   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                                        
                           ALABAMA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)ALABAMA RIVER BELOW CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL        2,406,000         356,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
    (N)DOG RIVER, AL                                           700,000         148,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                            ALASKA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)ANIAK, AK                                               550,000          37,000         113,000  ..............         113,000  ..............  
    (E)CHENA RIVER WATERSHED, AK                               980,000          74,000         223,000  ..............         223,000  ..............  
    (N)CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK                                   10,770,000         176,000  ..............          61,000  ..............          61,000  
       COSTAL STUDIES NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT            ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
   (FC)COOK INLET, AK                                        1,280,000  ..............  ..............         150,000  ..............         150,000  
    (N)DUTCH HARBOR, AK                                        900,000         752,000         148,000  ..............         148,000  ..............  
    (N)KENAI RIVER, AK                                  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (N)KUSKOKWIM RIVER, AK                                     750,000         130,000         238,000  ..............         238,000  ..............  
    (N)NOME HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS, AK                            670,000         208,000         160,000  ..............         160,000  ..............  
    (N)SAND POINT HARBOR, AK                                   726,000         326,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
    (N)SEWARD HARBOR, AK                                       432,000         172,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
    (N)SITKA LIGHTERING FACILITY AK                     ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............          90,000  ..............  
    (N)ST PAUL HARBOR, AK                                      731,000         716,000          15,000  ..............          15,000  ..............  
    (N)ST PAUL HARBOR, AK                                    8,800,000  ..............  ..............         150,000  ..............         150,000  
    (N)WRANGELL HARBOR, AK                                     700,000         130,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           ARIZONA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
  (RCP)ALAMO LAKE, AZ                                        1,030,000         580,000         257,000  ..............         257,000  ..............  
  (FDP)GILA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, N SCOTTSDALE              1,750,000         710,000         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
        DRAINAGE AREA,                                                                                                                                  
  (FDP)GILA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SANTA CRUZ RIVER            825,000         385,000         290,000  ..............         290,000  ..............  
        BASIN, AZ                                                                                                                                       
  (FDP)GILA RIVER, TORTOLITA DRAINAGE AREA, AZ               1,250,000         510,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
  (FDP)RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, AZ                            1,875,000         250,000         500,000  ..............         500,000  ..............  
    (E)RIO SALADO WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM, AZ                    2,045,000       1,099,000         500,000  ..............         500,000  ..............  
   (FC)TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, AZ                             18,000,000  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............         500,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           ARKANSAS                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR                              740,000         185,000         265,000  ..............         265,000  ..............  
  (FDP)MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX                             2,570,000         334,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
    (N)RED RIVER NAVIGATION, SOUTHWEST AR REEVALUATION       3,000,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         600,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          CALIFORNIA                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED, CA                        518,000,000      14,965,000  ..............       3,500,000  ..............       3,500,000  
  (SPE)CENTRAL BASIN GROUNDWATER PROJECT, CA                 1,900,000         900,000         363,000  ..............         363,000  ..............  
    (N)CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA                              1,300,000         165,000  ..............         495,000  ..............         495,000  
    (E)IMPERIAL COUNTY WATERSHED STUDY, CA                   1,250,000         225,000         389,000  ..............         389,000  ..............  
   (FC)KAWEAH RIVER, CA                                     29,500,000          50,000  ..............         600,000  ..............       1,000,000  
  (SPE)LACDA WATER CONS AND SUP(HANSEN AND LOPEZ             1,270,000         696,000         370,000  ..............         370,000  ..............  
        DAMS), CA                                                                                                                                       
  (SPE)LACDA WATER CONS AND SUP(WHITTIER NARROWS AND         1,360,000         741,000         430,000  ..............         430,000  ..............  
        SANTA FE  DAM                                                                                                                                   
    (N)MARINA DEL REY AND BALLONA CREEK, CA                    950,000         539,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (E)N CA STREAMS, CACHE CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL               1,250,000         520,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
        RESTORATION, C                                                                                                                                  
    (E)N CA STREAMS, SACRAMENTO RIVER FISH MIGRATION,        1,500,000         625,000         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
        CA                                                                                                                                              
   (FC)N CA STREAMS, WINTERS AND VICINITY, CA                  750,000  ..............  ..............         150,000  ..............         150,000  
  (FDP)N CA STREAMS, WINTERS AND VICINITY, CA                  781,000         751,000          30,000  ..............          30,000  ..............  
  (FDP)N CA STREAMS, YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA                    2,320,000       1,500,000         120,000  ..............         120,000  ..............  
   (FC)NAPA RIVER, CA                                       70,800,000      12,050,000  ..............         700,000  ..............         700,000  
    (E)NAPA RIVER, SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA                1,125,000         148,000         377,000  ..............         377,000  ..............  
    (E)NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA                                1,030,000         593,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (E)NORTHERN CALIFORNIA STREAMS, MIDDLE CREEK, CA         1,500,000         222,000         410,000  ..............         410,000  ..............  
   (FC)PAJARO RIVER AT WATSONVILLE, CA                      10,240,000         689,000  ..............         810,000  ..............         810,000  
   (SP)PENINSULA BEACH, CA                                     400,000         148,000         252,000  ..............         252,000  ..............  
    (N)PILLAR POINT HARBOR, CA                                 910,000         395,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
    (N)PORT HUENEME, CA                                        990,000         772,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (N)PORT OF LONG BEACH (DEEPENING), CA                   14,640,000         556,000  ..............         194,000  ..............         194,000  
    (E)PRADO BASIN WATER SUPPLY, CA                            790,000         100,000         350,000  ..............         350,000  ..............  
  (FDP)RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA                               1,230,000         910,000         270,000  ..............         270,000  ..............  
    (E)RUSSIAN RIVER, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA              1,125,000          74,000         386,000  ..............         386,000  ..............  
  (SPE)SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CA                      5,940,000       4,054,000         600,000  ..............         600,000  ..............  
    (E)SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, LITTLE HOLLAND          1,150,000         405,000         150,000  ..............         150,000  ..............  
        TRACT, CA                                                                                                                                       
    (E)SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, WESTERN DELTA           1,850,000         798,000         400,000  ..............         400,000  ..............  
        ISLANDS, C                                                                                                                                      
  (FDP)SAN ANTONIO CREEK, CA                                 1,125,000         460,000         128,000  ..............         128,000  ..............  
    (E)SAN JOAQUIN R BASIN, PINE FLAT DAM, F&WL              1,915,000         865,000         500,000  ..............         500,000  ..............  
        HABITAT RESTO                                                                                                                                   
  (FDP)SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, ARROYO PASAJERO              3,665,000       2,427,000       1,000,000  ..............       1,000,000  ..............  
        (FRESNO CO),                                                                                                                                    
  (FDP)SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, SOUTH SACRAMENTO             2,070,000       1,249,000         550,000  ..............         550,000  ..............  
        COUNTY STREA                                                                                                                                    
  (FDP)SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, STOCKTON METROPOLITAN        2,000,000         296,000         540,000  ..............         540,000  ..............  
        AREA, C                                                                                                                                         
  (FDP)SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, TULE RIVER, CA               1,469,000         869,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (E)SAN JUAN AND ALISO CREEKS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT,       1,250,000         225,000         365,000  ..............         365,000  ..............  
        CA                                                                                                                                              
  (FDP)SANTA BARBARA COUNTY STREAMS, LOWER MISSION           2,799,000       2,049,000         350,000  ..............         350,000  ..............  
        CREEK, CA                                                                                                                                       
   (FC)SEVEN OAKS AND PRADO DAMS WATER CONSERVATION,    ..............  ..............  ..............         250,000  ..............         250,000  
        CA                                                                                                                                              
  (FDP)SEVEN OAKS AND PRADO DAMS WATER CONSERVATION,         1,168,000       1,108,000          60,000  ..............          60,000  ..............  
        CA                                                                                                                                              
  (FDP)UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA                             2,974,000       2,395,000         579,000  ..............         579,000  ..............  
  (FDP)UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA                            1,815,000         415,000         450,000  ..............         450,000  ..............  
   (SP)VENTURA AND SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SHORELINE, CA          400,000         148,000         252,000  ..............         252,000  ..............  
  (FDP)WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CA                            2,080,000       1,168,000         430,000  ..............         430,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           DELAWARE                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)C&D CANAL--BALTIMORE HBR CONN CHANNELS, DE AND        2,615,000       2,570,000          45,000  ..............          45,000  ..............  
        MD (DEEP                                                                                                                                        
    (N)C&D CANAL--BALTIMORE HBR CONN CHANNELS, DE AND       76,100,000  ..............  ..............       1,210,000  ..............       1,210,000  
        MD (DEEP                                                                                                                                        
   (SP)DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DE AND NJ                     3,406,000       2,708,000         557,000  ..............         557,000  ..............  
   (SP)DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK          2,845,000       2,189,000         288,000  ..............         288,000  ..............  
        ISLAND, D                                                                                                                                       
    (N)DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, DE, NJ       263,040,000       9,844,000  ..............         156,000  ..............         156,000  
        AND PA                                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                                        
                           FLORIDA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)BIG BEND CHANNEL                                 ..............  ..............  ..............         250,000  ..............         250,000  
       BREVARD COUNTY, FL                               ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  
    (N)HILLSBORO INLET, FL                                   1,680,000         222,000  ..............         200,000  ..............         200,000  
    (N)INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL     ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000  ..............         200,000  
    (N)INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL            150,000         111,000          39,000  ..............          39,000  ..............  
    (N)JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL                               1,308,000         793,000         246,000  ..............         246,000  ..............  
   (SP)LIDO KEY SARASOTA COUNTY, FL                            100,000          74,000          26,000  ..............          26,000  ..............  
   (BE)NASSAU COUNTY, FL                                    11,622,000       1,282,000  ..............         400,000  ..............         400,000  
    (N)PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL                                 941,000         817,000         112,000  ..............         112,000  ..............  
    (N)PORT EVERGLADES, FL                                     425,000  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         175,000  
    (N)ST LUCIE INLET, FL                               ..............         296,000  ..............         300,000  ..............         300,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           GEORGIA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (E)ATLANTA WATERSHED, GA                                 1,600,000         275,000         325,000  ..............         325,000  ..............  
    (N)BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA                                  2,477,000       2,106,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
  (FDP)FLINT RIVER BASIN STUDY, GA                           1,400,000  ..............         260,000  ..............         260,000  ..............  
    (N)LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER, GA AND SC                       2,265,000         200,000  ..............         400,000  ..............         400,000  
    (N)SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA                         2,425,000         296,000         400,000  ..............         400,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                            HAWAII                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, OAHU, HI           1,243,000         523,000         350,000  ..............         350,000  ..............  
    (N)KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HI                 6,197,000         576,000  ..............         365,000  ..............         365,000  
    (N)MAUI SECOND HARBOR, MAUI, HI                            541,000          96,000         120,000  ..............         120,000  ..............  
  (FDP)WAILUPE STREAM FLOOD CONTROL STUDY, OAHU, HI          1,016,000         584,000         230,000  ..............         230,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           ILLINOIS                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)ALEXANDER AND PULASKI COUNTIES, IL                    1,247,000         855,000         175,000  ..............         175,000  ..............  
   (FC)DES PLAINES RIVER, IL                               113,000,000  ..............  ..............         350,000  ..............         350,000  
  (RDP)FREEPORT, IL                                          1,005,000         330,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
   (FC)NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL               9,940,000         186,000  ..............         100,000  ..............         100,000  
  (RCP)UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND ILLINOIS NAV STUDY, IL,        50,360,000      27,296,000       9,883,000  ..............      11,000,000  ..............  
        IA, MN, MO                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
                           INDIANA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)INDIANAPOLIS, WHITE RIVER (NORTH), IN            ..............          50,000  ..............         475,000  ..............         475,000  
  (FDP)WABASH RIVER BASIN (MIDDLE REACHES), IN AND IL        1,116,000       1,011,000         105,000  ..............         105,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                             IOWA                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                        
  (RCP)CORALVILLE LAKE, IA                                   1,100,000          65,000         235,000  ..............         235,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                            KANSAS                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
  (SPE)GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER, KS                                500,000         371,000         129,000  ..............         129,000  ..............  
  (RCP)KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS                                      913,000         250,000          25,000  ..............          25,000  ..............  
  (RCP)MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 AND           1,875,000         750,000         145,000  ..............         145,000  ..............  
        R460-471, KS                                                                                                                                    
  (RCP)SALINA, KS                                              850,000          23,000         302,000  ..............         302,000  ..............  
  (RCP)TOPEKA, KS                                              968,000           5,000         367,000  ..............         367,000  ..............  
   (FC)TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS AND MO                        22,000,000  ..............  ..............          25,000  ..............          25,000  
  (FDP)TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS AND MO                         1,770,000       1,691,000          79,000  ..............          79,000  ..............  
  (RCP)WILSON LAKE, KS                                         400,000           5,000         155,000  ..............         155,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           KENTUCKY                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS NAVIGATION DISPOSITION          430,000          50,000         380,000  ..............         380,000  ..............  
        STUDY,                                                                                                                                          
    (N)KENTUCKY LOCK, KY                                   235,000,000       6,500,000  ..............       3,000,000  ..............       3,000,000  
  (FDP)LEXINGTON, FAYETTE COUNTY, KY                         1,088,000         251,000         149,000  ..............         149,000  ..............  
  (FDP)METROPOLITAN CINCINNATI, NORTHERN KENTUCKY, KY        1,043,000         400,000         315,000  ..............         315,000  ..............  
  (FDP)METROPOLITAN LOUISVILLE, BEARGRASS CREEK, KY          1,310,000       1,230,000          80,000  ..............          80,000  ..............  
   (FC)METROPOLITAN LOUISVILLE, BEARGRASS CREEK, KY     ..............  ..............  ..............         150,000  ..............         150,000  
  (FDP)METROPOLITAN LOUISVILLE, SOUTHWEST, KY                1,508,000         500,000         262,000  ..............         262,000  ..............  
    (N)OHIO RIVER MAIN STEM SYSTEMS STUDY, KY, IL, IN,      38,400,000       7,993,000       7,719,000  ..............       7,719,000  ..............  
        PA, WV                                                                                                                                          
       PANTHER CREEK, KY                                ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          LOUISIANA                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LA                         200,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000  ..............  
  (FDP)BAYOU TIGRE, ERATH, LA                                1,285,000         185,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
  (FDP)BLACK BAYOU DIVERSION, LA                             1,442,000         342,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
   (FC)COMITE RIVER, LA                                     60,800,000       5,559,000  ..............         200,000  ..............         200,000  
   (FC)EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA                          91,000,000         667,000  ..............         400,000  ..............         400,000  
    (N)INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY LOCKS, LA                       4,796,000       2,414,000         600,000  ..............         600,000  ..............  
  (FDP)JEFFERSON PARISH, LA                                  4,710,000       2,403,000         593,000  ..............         593,000  ..............  
  (FDP)LAFAYETTE PARISH, LA                                  2,826,000         814,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (N)MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, LA       1,000,000         222,000         278,000  ..............         278,000  ..............  
  (FDP)ORLEANS PARISH, LA                                    2,700,000       1,397,000         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
  (FDP)ST TAMMANY PARISH, LA                                 2,407,000         507,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
   (FC)WEST BANK--EAST OF HARVEY CANAL, LA                  66,650,000       1,629,000  ..............          50,000  ..............          50,000  
  (FDP)WEST SHORE--LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA                    1,810,000         371,000         129,000  ..............         129,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           MARYLAND                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD AND DC            3,145,000       1,979,000         700,000  ..............         700,000  ..............  
    (E)ANACOSTIA RIVER FEDERAL WATERSHED IMPACT                600,000         148,000         442,000  ..............         442,000  ..............  
        ASSESSMENT, M                                                                                                                                   
    (N)BALTIMORE HARBOR ANCHORAGES AND CHANNELS, MD         24,000,000  ..............  ..............         338,000  ..............         338,000  
    (N)BALTIMORE HARBOR ANCHORAGES AND CHANNELS, MD          1,740,000       1,549,000         191,000  ..............         191,000  ..............  
  (FDP)BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES STUDY,         1,795,000         720,000         596,000  ..............         596,000  ..............  
        MD                                                                                                                                              
  (SPE)CHESAPEAKE BAY TIME VARIABLE MODEL, MD, VA, PA        3,000,000       2,478,000         522,000  ..............         522,000  ..............  
        AND DC                                                                                                                                          
   (FC)JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE--REALLOCATION, MD AND WV       1,900,000  ..............  ..............          37,000  ..............          37,000  
  (RCP)JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE--REALLOCATION, MD AND WV         712,000         678,000          34,000  ..............          34,000  ..............  
    (N)OCEAN CITY, MD AND VICINITY                           2,689,000       1,846,000         740,000  ..............         740,000         250,000  
  (FDP)PATUXENT RIVER WATER RESOURCES, MD                    2,350,000         650,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (E)SMITH ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, MD            1,750,000         150,000         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                        MASSACHUSETTS                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
    (E)BLACKSTONE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, MA AND        1,600,000         100,000         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
        RI                                                                                                                                              
    (N)BOSTON HARBOR, MA                                    20,400,000       2,010,000  ..............          90,000  ..............          90,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           MICHIGAN                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
       SAULT STE MARIE, MI                              ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         250,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          MINNESOTA                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)CROOKSTON, MN                                    ..............  ..............  ..............         190,000  ..............         190,000  
  (FDP)CROOKSTON, MN                                           995,000         939,000          56,000  ..............          56,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                         MISSISSIPPI                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MS                        67,326,000         355,000  ..............       2,790,000  ..............       2,790,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           MISSOURI                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO                     8,550,000           7,000  ..............         450,000  ..............         450,000  
  (FDP)CHESTERFIELD, MO                                      1,307,000         307,000         285,000  ..............         285,000  ..............  
  (RCP)FABIUS RIVER LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO          1,000,000          82,000         318,000  ..............         318,000  ..............  
  (FDP)FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MO                             906,000         306,000          50,000  ..............          50,000  ..............  
  (FDP)LOWER RIVER DES PERES, MO                             1,256,000         306,000          50,000  ..............          50,000  ..............  
  (FDP)SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO             585,000         234,000          55,000  ..............          55,000  ..............  
    (N)ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL                      ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         650,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           NEBRASKA                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE                             838,000         531,000         175,000  ..............         175,000  ..............  
  (FDP)LOWER PLATTE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NE                1,991,000         491,000         420,000  ..............         420,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                            NEVADA                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (E)LOWER LAS VEGAS WASH WETLANDS, NV                     1,300,000         350,000         210,000  ..............         210,000  ..............  
    (E)LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, PAIUTE, NV                       1,355,000         933,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
    (E)LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, WASHOE COUNTY, NV                  790,000         327,000         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
  (FDP)NORTH LAS VEGAS, CHANNEL ``A'', NV                    1,000,000  ..............         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
  (FDP)TRUCKEE MEADOWS, RENO, NV                             1,700,000          50,000         650,000  ..............         650,000  ..............  
    (N)TAHOE BASIN, NV AND CA                                  600,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          NEW JERSEY                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
       BARNEGAT BAY ESTUARY AND WATERSHED, NJ           ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         350,000  ..............  
       BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ    ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         300,000  ..............  
   (SP)BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ        1,717,000       1,485,000         160,000  ..............         160,000  ..............  
   (SP)LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS--CAPE MAY POINT, NJ            1,300,000       1,015,000         231,000  ..............         231,000  ..............  
       NEW JERSEY INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ             ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         375,000  ..............  
   (SP)RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY (CLIFFWOOD             1,120,000         295,000          25,000  ..............          25,000  ..............  
        BEACH), NJ                                                                                                                                      
   (SP)RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ                    3,189,000       1,682,000         590,000  ..............         590,000  ..............  
   (FC)RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ      186,000,000      21,219,000  ..............       2,781,000  ..............       2,781,000  
  (FDP)SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ                  2,800,000         697,000         400,000  ..............         400,000  ..............  
   (SP)TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ                 1,250,000       1,205,000          45,000  ..............          45,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          NEW MEXICO                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)LAS CRUCES, EL PASO AND VICINITY, NM                  4,600,000         193,000  ..............         207,000  ..............         207,000  
  (SPE)RIO CHAMA, ABIQUIU DAM TO ESPANOLA, NM                1,000,000         400,000         150,000  ..............         150,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           NEW YORK                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (RCP)ADDISON, NY                                           1,380,000         230,000          75,000  ..............          75,000  ..............  
    (N)ARTHUR KILL CHANNEL--HOWLAND HOOK MARINE             28,700,000       2,296,000  ..............       1,200,000  ..............       1,200,000  
        TERMINAL, NY                                                                                                                                    
   (SP)ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK, NY                        7,000,000       1,806,000       1,400,000  ..............       1,400,000  ..............  
       CHEMUNG RIVER BASIN, NY                                 500,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000  ..............  
    (N)HUDSON RIVER HABITAT RESTORATION, NY                  3,025,000         525,000         375,000  ..............         375,000  ..............  
   (SP)JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH, NY          3,000,000         903,000         600,000  ..............         600,000  ..............  
   (BE)LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY                                35,500,000         808,000  ..............         742,000  ..............         742,000  
    (N)NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY AND NJ        ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
  (SPE)ONONDAGA LAKE, NY                                       760,000         535,000         120,000  ..............         120,000  ..............  
       SOUTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, NY                   ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         300,000  ..............  
  (FDP)SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT, NY,         2,500,000         591,000         209,000  ..............         209,000  ..............  
        PA AND MD                                                                                                                                       
  (FDP)UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NY                      500,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         400,000  ..............  
   (SP)YONKERS SHORELINE, NY                                 2,000,000         475,000          25,000  ..............          25,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                        NORTH CAROLINA                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC                         25,100,000       2,592,000  ..............         500,000  ..............         500,000  
    (N)CAPE FEAR--NORTHEAST (CAPE FEAR) RIVER, NC          150,120,000  ..............  ..............       1,000,000  ..............       1,000,000  
   (SP)DARE COUNTY BEACHES, NC                               2,097,000       1,169,000         400,000  ..............         400,000  ..............  
    (N)WILMINGTON HARBOR--NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER,        25,729,000       1,880,000  ..............         100,000  ..............         100,000  
        NC                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                        
                         NORTH DAKOTA                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
  (SPE)DEVILS LAKE, ND                                       4,445,000       1,294,000       1,100,000  ..............       1,100,000  ..............  
  (FDP)GRAND FORKS, ND                                       1,560,000       1,119,000         361,000  ..............         361,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                            OREGON                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)COLUMBIA RIVER NAVIGATION CHANNEL DEEPENING, OR       4,228,000       2,225,000         600,000  ..............         600,000  ..............  
        AND WA                                                                                                                                          
    (E)MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE FISHERY RESTORATION, OR        1,450,000         271,000         179,000  ..............         179,000  ..............  
    (E)WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR AND WA                  856,000          74,000         230,000  ..............         230,000  ..............  
  (COM)WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN REVIEW, OR                     2,225,000         945,000         400,000  ..............         400,000  ..............  
   (MP)WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR             45,200,000       1,232,000  ..............       1,000,000  ..............       1,000,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                         PENNSYLVANIA                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
    (E)CONEMAUGH RVR BASIN, NANTY GLO ENVIRONMENTAL            753,000         703,000          50,000  ..............          50,000  ..............  
        RESTORATI                                                                                                                                       
  (FDP)JUNIATA RIVER BASIN, PA                               2,500,000         500,000         600,000  ..............         600,000  ..............  
  (FDP)LACKAWANNA RIVER, (GREEN RIDGE AND PLOT          ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         600,000  
        SECTIONS)                                                                                                                                       
       LOWER WEST BRANCH SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PA           540,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         300,000  ..............  
  (FDP)MILTON, PA                                            1,560,000         487,000          73,000  ..............          73,000  ..............  
  (FDP)SCHYULKILL RIVER BASIN, SCHUYLKILL HAVEN AREA,          630,000         200,000         175,000  ..............         175,000  ..............  
        PA                                                                                                                                              
       TIOGA RIVER WATERSHED, PA                        ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         250,000  ..............  
  (RCP)YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, STORAGE REALLOCATION,          600,000         200,000         175,000  ..............         175,000  ..............  
        PA AND MD                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                        
                         PUERTO RICO                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)RIO GUANAJIBO, PR                                    23,400,000  ..............  ..............         600,000  ..............         600,000  
   (FC)RIO NIGUA AT SALINAS, PR                             11,175,000  ..............  ..............         329,000  ..............         329,000  
    (N)SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR                                  43,000,000       3,223,000  ..............         150,000  ..............         150,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                         RHODE ISLAND                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
       RHODE ISLAND SOUTH COAST, HABITAT REST. AND             400,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         300,000  ..............  
        STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION, RI                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
                        SOUTH CAROLINA                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC                      500,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         225,000  ..............  
    (N)CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (DEEPENING AND WIDENING)       72,800,000  ..............  ..............         225,000  ..............         225,000  
    (N)GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC                                 1,397,000         205,000         207,000  ..............         207,000  ..............  
    (N)SANTEE, COOPER, CONGAREE RIVERS, SC                   1,828,000         204,000         254,000  ..............         254,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          TENNESSEE                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
       DUCK RIVER, TN                                   ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
  (FDP)EAST RIDGE, HAMILTON COUNTY, TN                       1,500,000  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  
  (FDP)EMILY AVE AND TIMOTHY ST., KNOXVILLE, TN                100,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         100,000  ..............  
       MEMPHIS METROPOLITAN AREA, TN AND MS             ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       1,200,000  ..............  
  (FDP)METRO CENTER LEVEE, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN                 990,000         660,000         330,000  ..............         330,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                            TEXAS                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)ALPINE, TX                                            1,150,000         222,000         178,000  ..............         178,000  ..............  
   (FC)BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX                            207,244,000       2,889,000  ..............       1,110,000  ..............       1,110,000  
  (SPE)COLONIAS ALONG U.S.-MEXICO BORDER, TX AND AZ            614,000         294,000         320,000  ..............         320,000  ..............  
    (N)CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX                       5,171,000         436,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
   (FC)CYPRESS CREEK, HOUSTON, TX                          104,874,000       1,722,000  ..............         400,000  ..............         400,000  
    (E)CYPRESS VALLEY WATERSHED, TX                          1,951,000       1,007,000          50,000  ..............          50,000  ..............  
   (FC)DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER, TX         25,000,000       2,150,000  ..............         930,000  ..............         930,000  
    (N)GIWW--ARANSAS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, TX           20,300,000         718,000  ..............         857,000  ..............         857,000  
  (RDP)GIWW--HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER, TX                 3,720,000         602,000       1,200,000  ..............       1,200,000  ..............  
   (FC)GRAHAM, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN)                       3,700,000  ..............  ..............          50,000  ..............          50,000  
   (FC)GREENS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX                           137,853,000       3,010,000  ..............         860,000  ..............         860,000  
    (N)HOUSTON--GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX          252,754,000      17,318,000  ..............       1,900,000  ..............       1,900,000  
    (N)NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES SALTWATER BARRIER,      17,955,000       1,848,000  ..............         520,000  ..............         520,000  
        TX                                                                                                                                              
  (FDP)NORTHWEST EL PASO, TX                                 1,080,000  ..............         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
  (FDP)PECAN BAYOU, BROWNWOOD, TX                              888,000         661,000         140,000  ..............         140,000  ..............  
    (E)PLAINVIEW, BRAZOS RIVER BASIN, TX                       773,000         473,000         100,000  ..............         100,000  ..............  
   (FC)SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX                              151,300,000       3,410,000  ..............         650,000  ..............         650,000  
  (FDP)UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX                         8,235,000       4,578,000       1,230,000  ..............       1,230,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                             UTAH                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                        
  (FDP)PROVO AND VICINITY, UT                                1,550,000         334,000         320,000  ..............         320,000  ..............  
    (E)UPPER JORDAN RIVER RESTORATION, UT                      600,000  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                        VIRGIN ISLANDS                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)CROWN BAY CHANNEL, VI                            ..............  ..............  ..............         100,000  ..............         100,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           VIRGINIA                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
    (N)AIWW BRIDGE AT GREAT BRIDGE, VA                      22,800,000       1,656,000  ..............         344,000  ..............         344,000  
   (SP)CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, POQUOSON, VA                  925,000          74,000         301,000  ..............         301,000  ..............  
  (RCP)JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA AND NC                           2,400,000         185,000         620,000  ..............         620,000  ..............  
  (SPE)NANSEMOND RIVER BASIN, SUFFOLK, VA                    1,450,000         274,000         226,000  ..............         226,000  ..............  
       NORFOLK VIRGNIA, VICINITY OF WILLOUGHBY SPIT,    ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         375,000  
        VA                                                                                                                                              
   (BE)SANDBRIDGE, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA                      205,840,000         967,000  ..............         283,000  ..............         283,000  
                                                                                                                                                        
                          WASHINGTON                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
  (SPE)CHIEF JOSEPH POOL RAISE, WA                           1,727,000         589,000         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
    (E)DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER, WA                            950,000         286,000         150,000  ..............         150,000  ..............  
  (RCP)HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA                                 2,225,000       1,789,000         320,000  ..............         320,000  ..............  
  (RCP)LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA                          770,000         279,000         140,000  ..............         140,000  ..............  
    (N)PUGET SOUND CONFINED DISPOSAL SITES, WA               1,350,000         411,000         330,000  ..............         330,000  ..............  
  (FDP)SKAGIT RIVER, WA                                      1,510,000         510,000         350,000  ..............         350,000  ..............  
    (E)STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA                               1,080,000          69,000         331,000  ..............         331,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                        WEST VIRGINIA                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
    (E)CHEAT R B, N BRANCH, LICK RUN ENVIRONMENTAL             945,000         445,000         350,000  ..............         350,000  ..............  
        RESTORATIO                                                                                                                                      
  (FDP)GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV                              550,000          50,000  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
    (N)KANAWHA RIVER NAVIGATION, WV                         11,700,000      11,129,000         400,000  ..............         400,000  ..............  
    (N)LONDON LOCKS AND DAM, WV                             12,500,000  ..............  ..............         366,000  ..............         366,000  
    (N)MARMET LOCKS AND DAM, WV                            166,000,000       7,850,000  ..............       1,850,000  ..............       1,850,000  
  (FDP)NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RVR ENVIRONMENTAL                1,875,000         703,000         550,000  ..............         550,000  ..............  
        RESTORATION, WV                                                                                                                                 
    (E)TYGART VALLEY R B, GRASSY RUN ENVIRONMENTAL           1,087,000         587,000         350,000  ..............         350,000  ..............  
        RESTORATIO                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
                          WISCONSIN                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                        
  (RCP)FOX RIVER, WI                                         1,496,000       1,309,000         187,000  ..............         187,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                           WYOMING                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                        
    (E)JACKSON HOLE RESTORATION, WY                          1,482,000         932,000         200,000  ..............         200,000  ..............  
                                                                                                                                                        
                        MISCELLANEOUS                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
       AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT             ..............  ..............         650,000  ..............         650,000  ..............  
       COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION                    ..............  ..............       1,500,000  ..............       1,500,000  ..............  
       COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES         ..............  ..............       8,540,000  ..............       8,040,000  ..............  
       FLOOD DAMAGE DATA                                ..............  ..............         250,000  ..............         250,000  ..............  
       FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES                  ..............  ..............      10,000,000  ..............       9,350,000  ..............  
       GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (SEC. 401)   ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............  
       HYDROLOGIC STUDIES                               ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............         500,000  ..............  
       INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES                      ..............  ..............         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
       NATIONAL DREDGING NEEDS STUDY OF PORTS AND       ..............  ..............         575,000  ..............         575,000  ..............  
        HARBORS                                                                                                                                         
       PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATEHER         ..............  ..............         500,000  ..............         500,000  ..............  
        SERVICE)                                                                                                                                        
       REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM     ..............  ..............         300,000  ..............         300,000  ..............  
        SUPPORT                                                                                                                                         
       RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT                         ..............  ..............      27,000,000  ..............      28,600,000  ..............  
       SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS     ..............  ..............         150,000  ..............         150,000  ..............  
       STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)           ..............  ..............         770,000  ..............         770,000  ..............  
       TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS                           ..............  ..............         950,000  ..............         950,000  ..............  
       REDUCTION FOR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE   ..............  ..............     -16,064,000  ..............     -18,364,000  ..............  
                                                       =================================================================================================
             TOTAL, GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS              ..............  ..............     103,760,000      38,740,000     112,367,000      42,190,000  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TYPE OF PROJECT:                                                                                                                                 
           (N)  NAVIGATION                                                                                                                              
           (BE)  BEACH EROSION CONTROL                                                                                                                  
           (FC)  FLOOD CONTROL                                                                                                                          
           (MP)  MULTIPURPOSE, INCLUDING POWER                                                                                                          
           (SP)  SHORELINE PROTECTION                                                                                                                   
           (FDP)  FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION                                                                                                               
           (RCP)  REVIEW OF COMPLETED PROJECT                                                                                                           
           (RDP)  REVIEW OF DEFERRED PROJECT                                                                                                            
           (COMP)  COMPREHENSIVE                                                                                                                        
           (SPEC)  SPECIAL                                                                                                                              

    Coastal studies of navigation improvements, Alaska.--An 
appropriation of $500,000 has been included for the Corps to 
initiate a regional reconnaissance study which will evaluate 
the navigation needs of Alaska's coastal communities. By 
combining several harbor and navigation studies into this one 
study, the Corps is expected to be able to continue significant 
work substantially below the cost to address each project 
separately.
    Red River navigation, southwest Arkansas, Arkansas, and 
Louisiana.--The Committee has included $600,000 for the Corps 
of Engineers to initiate a cost-shared feasibility study to 
extend navigation on the Red River from Shreveport, LA, into 
southwest Arkansas. The Committee recognizes that this region 
is economically depressed and that extending commercial 
navigation upstream of Shreveport-Bossier City, LA, into 
southwest Arkansas holds the potential to provide benefits to 
the Nation due to lower transportation costs and economic 
activity in the area. The Committee understands that a non-
Federal interest has offered to cost share the feasibility 
study on a 50-50 basis in order to expedite completion of the 
study. The Committee expects the Corps of Engineers to work 
closely with the local sponsor to control study costs, and plan 
and conduct an efficient expedited study.
    Kawaeh River, CA.--The Committee has provided an additional 
$400,000, over the $600,000 budget request for the Kawaeh 
River, CA, study for the Corps to initiate geotechnical 
studies, hydraulic and sedimentation analyses in order to allow 
completion of the planning and engineering design in fiscal 
year 1998 if possible.
    Port Everglades Harbor, FL.--The Committee has included 
$175,000 for the Corps of Engineers to initiate a feasibility 
study on the Port Everglade Harbor, FL, project. The study will 
address geotechnical, environmental, economic, design, and ship 
simulation efforts.
    Kaumalapau Harbor, HI.--In the past, this Committee 
appropriated over $900,000 toward the research and design of a 
new breakwater to replace the current breakwater which users 
regard as unsafe. The Committee is aware that Lanai's petroleum 
products supplier recently announced its intention to cancel 
all deliveries to the island due to the unsafe condition of the 
breakwater.
    The Committee recognizes that the standard procedures in 
determining a benefit/cost ratio may not fully take into 
consideration the unique requirements of an island State 
dependent on ocean traffic for the delivery of supplies. The 
Committee, therefore, expects the Army Corps of Engineers to 
work toward resolving concerns about the formula for 
establishing a benefit/cost ratio. Similarly, the Committee 
urges the Corps to work with residents and businesses on Lanai, 
the barge operators, the State of Hawaii, and this Committee to 
determine how best to resolve the safety problems at Kaumalapau 
Harbor. Any action on the part of the Corps of Engineers is 
contingent, however, upon the State of Hawaii taking over 
control of the harbor.
    Upper Mississippi and Illinois navigation study, Illinois, 
Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.--The Committee has 
included $11,000,000 for the Upper Mississippi and Illinois 
navigation study. This is the full capability of the Corps of 
Engineers for fiscal year 1997. The Committee directs the Corps 
to accelerate the execution of the feasibility study activities 
in accordance with the approved project study plan in such a 
manner that schedule recovery will be maximized and a final 
report will be completed as early as practicable. The Committee 
reaffirms the position taken on this project in the conference 
report on the Energy and Water Development Act for 1996.
    Kentucky lock and dam, Kentucky.--The Committee has 
provided the full budget request of $3,000,000 for the Kentucky 
lock and dam to continue preconstruction engineering and design 
activities. If additional funding is needed during the year to 
keep work on schedule, the Committee urges the Corps to take 
appropriate actions to reprogram additional funds into the 
project.
    Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana.--The recommendation 
includes an amount of $200,000 to reevaluate the benefit-cost 
analysis in connection with proposed flood control solutions in 
the Amite River basin and continued review of the previous 
studies of Darlington Reservoir.
    Ocean City, MD, and vicinity, (Assateague Island).--In 
addition to the budget request of $740,000, the Committee has 
recommended $250,000 for the Corps to initiate preconstruction 
engineering and design of measures to mitigate damages to 
Assateague Island National Seashore and vicinity impacted by 
Federal projects constructed to stabilize inlet conditions for 
navigation and protection of shoreline erosion.
    St. Louis Harbor, MO.--The Committee has included $650,000 
for the St. Louis Harbor, MO, project, to continue the general 
reevaluation, including the collection of basic physical and 
economic data, identification of potential harbor sites, and 
formulation and evaluation of alternative plans.
    Devils Lake, ND.--An appropriation of $1,100,000, the full 
budget request, has been included for the Corps to expedite 
work on the Devils Lake, ND, feasibility study for lake 
stabilization, including an inlet and outlet at the lake. The 
Committee urges the Corps to work cooperatively with the Bureau 
of Reclamation and the State of North Dakota in this effort. 
The Committee expects the study will address all aspects of the 
project set out in the study evaluation.
    Barnegat Bay, NJ.--The Committee had included $350,000 for 
the Corps to initiate a reconnaissance study to develop a 
comprehensive management plan for a variety of water resource 
problems in the Barnegat Bay area of New Jersey.
    New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway [NJIWW], NJ.--The bill 
includes $375,000 for the Corps to undertake a reconnaissance 
study to identify the ecosystem restoration opportunities along 
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in New Jersey, including the 
emphasis of techniques for the beneficial use of dredged 
material.
    Chemung River basin, Susquehanna River basin, New York and 
Pennsylvania.--An amount of $200,000 has been provided to 
undertake a reconnaissance study of the water resource 
improvements needs for streambank stabilization, flood damage 
reduction, environmental restoration, and other allied purposes 
in the Chemung River basin in New York upstream of the 
confluence with the mainstem Susquehanna River.
    Tahoe basin, Nevada and California.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $500,000 for the Tahoe basin study in 
Nevada and California. The study will examine flood control, 
water quality, wetland habitat, and other environmental 
restoration opportunities. The study is critical for restoring 
the health of Lake Tahoe and the Lake Tahoe basin.
    Willamette River temperature control, Oregon.--The 
Committee directs the Corps to remain on its present schedule 
for the Willamette River temperature control project at Cougar 
Lake in Oregon. In particular, the Committee directs the Corps 
to complete plans and specifications for the Cougar Lake 
project by December 1997.
    Lackawanna River, Scranton, PA, (Green Ridge and Plot 
sections).--The Committee has provided $300,000 each for the 
Lackawanna River, Green Ridge and Plot sections for the Corps 
of Engineers to undertake the cost-shared planning and design 
phase of the projects.
    Rhode Island, south coast, Rhode Island.--The Committee has 
provided $300,000 for the Corps to conduct a reconnaissance 
study of potential flood control and watershed improvements, 
frontal erosion prevention, coastal storm damage reduction, and 
habitat restoration along the Rhode Island south coast from 
Watch Hill to Narragansett, RI.
    Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway [AIWW], SC.--The Committee 
has included $225,000 for the Corps to initiate a 
reconnaissance study to develop a master plan for the 
maintenance and operation of the AIWW in South Carolina caused 
by significant changes along the waterway; including the 
development a long-range disposal plan, the feasibility of 
releasing excess easement areas, restoration of the 
environment, and development and protection of wildlife habitat 
in the existing easement areas consistent with disposal 
requirements.
    Memphis metro area, Tennessee and Mississippi.--The bill 
includes $1,200,000 for the Corps to initiate a reconnaissance 
study to evaluate the problems and opportunities for flood 
control, urban drainage, storm water management, water quality, 
environmental enhancement and protection, and other water 
resource problems in the Memphis metropolitan area in 
Tennessee.
    Cheat River basin, West Virginia, environmental 
restoration.--The Committee is aware of and supports efforts of 
the Corps of Engineers to identify environmental restoration 
problems in the Cheat River basin in West Virginia. However, 
the Committee feels that prior to proceeding with the Lick Run 
project, more detailed analysis and investigations of potential 
higher priority sites in the Cheat River basin is warranted. 
Therefore, the Committee directs the Corps to use the $350,000 
provided herein to further Cheat basin reconnaissance studies 
in an effort to identify the highest priority acid mine 
drainage projects in the basin. The Corps is to work closely 
with the State in this effort.
    Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.--The Committee has 
provided $500,000 for the Corps to resume feasibility studies 
in the Greenbrier River basin in West Virginia. The Committee 
is aware of the Corps' efforts to update hydrology and 
hydraulics in the basin to account for recent floods in the 
area. These studies will allow the Corps to evaluate a wide 
range of alternatives and recommend a specific plan for 
implementation.
    Research and development.--An appropriation of $28,600,000 
is recommended for research and development activities of the 
Corps of Engineers. The Committee believes it inappropriate to 
earmark funding for university research institutions given the 
limited resources and severe budget constraints.
    The Committee has provided $1,500,000 for zebra mussel 
research, which is the same as the fiscal year 1997 budget 
allocation. Given that this is a nationwide program and the 
limited funding available, the Committee believes it 
inappropriate to earmark the limited funds available. The 
Committee has been informed of the need to conduct activities 
in the Great Lakes region and Lake Champlain, VT. The Committee 
expects the Corps of Engineers to apply the funds to various 
regions geographically, and on varying technologies and 
applications in order to accomplish the highest-priority work.
    The Corps research and development program includes 
materials and structural engineering activities to provide 
improved techniques and technologies to significantly reduce 
construction costs and to improve structural durability, 
service life, and safety. As the Nation undertakes to 
rehabilitate its domestic infrastructure, it is becoming 
increasingly apparent that for reasons of both environmental 
protection and longevity, traditional construction methods and 
materials are not cost effective when compared to new designs 
and composite materials. In an effort to demonstrate the 
feasibility of advanced composite designs for application in a 
marine environment, the Committee has included $1,600,000 for 
cost-shared research and development and installation of 
composite pilings with the Greater New Orleans Expressway 
Commission at Lake Pontchartrain and the Waterways Experiment 
Station [WES] in Vicksburg.
    Coordination and studies with other agencies.--The 
Committee recommendation for coordination and studies with 
other agencies includes $450,000 for the Corps of Engineers to 
continue to participate as a stake holder in the interagency 
ecosystem management task force's Pacific Northwest forest case 
study with responsibility to restore, sustain, and develop 
coordinated watershed ecosystem management strategies for 
species viability on all public lands. These strategies will 
consider ecological, social, and economic principles to manage 
biological and physical systems in a manner that safeguards the 
long-term ecological sustainability, natural diversity, and 
productivity of the watershed and its landscapes. The 
strategies will include the evaluation, planning, design, and 
completion of restoration or demonstration projects and the 
development of coordinated directives for the management of 
aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. In as much as possible, 
these strategies will complete or complement State and local 
watershed restoration efforts on public and private lands or in 
conjunction with American Indian tribes.

                         construction, general

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $804,573,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     914,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           1,024,195,000

    An appropriation of $1,024,195,000 is recommended for 
ongoing construction activities.

                Budget Constraints and Program Execution

    The Committee has been faced with difficult choices in 
development of the budget for the Corps of Engineers for fiscal 
year 1997. Severe reductions in budgetary resources last year 
forced the Committee to ask the Corps to undertake more work 
than available funds could support. In addition, after several 
years of poor performance in utilizing the funding provided by 
the Congress, the Corps has responded by raising their 
execution rate from around 70 percent to over 95 percent. The 
Committee received testimony that during the first quarter of 
this year the actual utilization of construction funding was 
104 percent of that planned. This has severely limited the 
Corps ability to respond to changing construction needs and 
eliminated the flexibility within the construction program to 
meet the demands of Congress to provide critical flood control 
protection, essential commercial navigation improvements, and 
other infrastructure needs in a timely manner.
    The Committee expects the budgetary resources for non-
Defense discretionary programs to continue to decline. In 
response to Committee questions, the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army for Civil Works indicated that OMB budget planning 
allocations between now and the year 2000 for Corps of 
Engineers programs and activities are expected to decline by 
$600,000,000.

                        new construction starts

    With continued reductions in budgetary resources, increased 
performance by the Corps of Engineers, severely limited program 
flexibility, and the uncertainty of future funding allocations, 
the Committee has decided not to commit to new construction 
projects, but to apply available resources on ongoing 
construction work. In addition, budgetary constraints and lack 
of program flexibility have limited the number of requests 
which could be accommodated by the Committee.

                       new project authorizations

    Finally, the Committee is troubled with the prospects of 
another extended period of stalemate, dispute, and lack of 
cooperation in the area of water resource policy. A similar 
dispute occurred between 1970 and 1986, a period of 16 years, 
when the water resource infrastructure needs of the Nation were 
neglected. The ever increasing population of the United States 
will require larger and larger amounts of water, not only for 
human needs, but also to support industrial development in 
order to sustain employment and create new jobs. Therefore, it 
is vitally important to the Nation that the executive branch 
and the Congress work together to develop sound and realistic 
water resource policy.
    The Committee received numerous requests to include project 
authorizations in the Energy and Water Development 
appropriations bill. However, in an effort to support 
congressional authorizing committees desires to enact 
comprehensive water resource authorizing legislation, and to 
underscore the importance of enacting authorizing legislation 
on a regular schedule, the Committee has not included new 
project authorizations.
    The Committee has included minor provisions which increase 
the cost ceiling for ongoing projects in order to prevent 
construction delays and associated increased costs.
    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:

                                    CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL                                   
                                              [Amounts in dollars]                                              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of                                        Total Federal     Allocated to                       Committee   
project             Project title                   cost             date       Budget estimate   recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                
                     ALABAMA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
    (N)BAYOU LA BATRE, AL                         6,184,000        5,061,000        1,123,000        1,123,000  
    (N)BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS,       16,123,000        1,565,000          600,000          600,000  
        VICINITY OF JACKSO                                                                                      
    (N)TENNESSEE--TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY             87,300,000       83,019,000        4,281,000        4,281,000  
        WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL                                                                                 
   (MP)WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL          27,400,000  ...............          900,000          900,000  
        AND GA (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
                      ALASKA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
       DILLINGHAM, AK (SHORELINE EROSION)         4,123,000          500,000  ...............        3,302,000  
   (FC)BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK             16,133,000       12,333,000        3,800,000        3,800,000  
    (N)KAKE HARBOR, AK                           10,116,000        1,206,000        4,000,000  ...............  
                                                                                                                
                     ARIZONA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (FC)CLIFTON, AZ                               11,500,000       11,296,000          204,000          204,000  
   (FC)RILLITO RIVER, AZ                         25,000,000       20,594,000        4,406,000        4,406,000  
                                                                                                                
                     ARKANSAS                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (MP)DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM POWERHOUSE,       29,700,000        4,666,000        6,000,000        6,000,000  
        AR (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                        
    (N)MCCLELLAN--KERR ARKANSAS RIVER           632,500,000      599,465,000        1,414,000        1,714,000  
        NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR                                                                                   
    (N)MONTGOMERY POINT LOCK AND DAM, AR        200,000,000       18,614,000        5,886,000        5,886,000  
       RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK                 137,975,000      100,262,000  ...............        6,000,000  
        PROTECTION, AR &LA                                                                                      
                                                                                                                
                    CALIFORNIA                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
   (FC)COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA           44,000,000       30,787,000        2,400,000        2,400,000  
   (FC)GUADALUPE RIVER, CA                       63,300,000       37,678,000        5,000,000        7,500,000  
   (FC)LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA,        204,000,000       18,874,000       14,400,000       14,400,000  
        CA                                                                                                      
    (N)LOS ANGELES HARBOR, CA                   100,700,000        4,640,000          850,000       10,000,000  
   (FC)LOWER SACRAMENTO AREA LEVEE                3,450,000        1,002,000           50,000           50,000  
        RECONSTRUCTION, CA                                                                                      
   (FC)MARYSVILLE/YUBA CITY LEVEE                23,600,000        7,548,000        4,200,000        4,200,000  
        RECONSTRUCTION, CA                                                                                      
   (FC)MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA                 85,900,000       16,090,000          800,000          800,000  
   (FC)MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE                     25,700,000        3,355,000          100,000          100,000  
        RECONSTRUCTION, CA                                                                                      
    (N)OAKLAND HARBOR, CA                        56,025,000       51,719,000        4,306,000        4,306,000  
    (N)RICHMOND HARBOR, CA                       24,350,000        9,116,000        3,000,000        3,000,000  
   (FC)SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION         159,100,000       92,523,000        6,100,000        6,100,000  
        PROJECT, CA                                                                                             
   (FC)SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN COLUSA            10,650,000        2,893,000        2,000,000        2,000,000  
        IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA                                                                                 
    (N)SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA        172,250,000       65,417,000          500,000          500,000  
   (FC)SAN LORENZO RIVER, CA                      9,030,000          844,000          200,000  ...............  
   (FC)SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA             778,000,000      445,114,000       51,020,000       51,020,000  
   (FC)SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA                     20,300,000       10,606,000        4,200,000        4,200,000  
   (BE)SURFSIDE--SUNSET--NEWPORT BEACH, CA       43,200,000       16,460,000        5,604,000        5,604,000  
   (FC)UPPER SACRAMENTO AREA LEVEE                2,890,000        1,150,000          300,000          300,000  
        RECONSTRUCTION, CA                                                                                      
   (FC)WEST SACRAMENTO, CA                       15,700,000        4,347,000        5,700,000        5,700,000  
                                                                                                                
                     COLORADO                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)ALAMOSA, CO                                5,950,000        2,607,000          100,000          100,000  
                                                                                                                
                     DELAWARE                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (BE)DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE             12,800,000        4,480,000          214,000          214,000  
                                                                                                                
                     FLORIDA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (FC)CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL       1,366,000,000      415,172,000       17,237,000       17,237,000  
   (FC)DADE COUNTY, FL                          170,400,000       49,851,000        2,100,000        2,100,000  
   (FC)FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL                    181,000,000       72,585,000          580,000          580,000  
   (MP)JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM                 30,600,000          550,000        1,400,000        1,400,000  
        POWERHOUSE, FL AND GA (MAJOR R                                                                          
    (E)KISSIMMEE RIVER, FL                      255,600,000       31,371,000        3,000,000        3,000,000  
       LEE COUNTY, FL                       ...............  ...............  ...............        1,000,000  
    (N)MANATEE HARBOR, FL                        18,585,000        3,010,000        2,800,000        2,800,000  
   (BE)MARTIN COUNTY, FL                         26,000,000        4,508,000          109,000          109,000  
    (N)MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL, FL                  51,066,000       15,748,000          500,000          500,000  
   (BE)PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL                     34,100,000        8,345,000        1,919,000        1,919,000  
        (REIMBURSEMENT)                                                                                         
   (BE)PINELLAS COUNTY, FL                      129,000,000       23,405,000        5,865,000        5,865,000  
       SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (VENICE               55,200,000        7,035,000  ...............          900,000  
        SEGMENT)                                                                                                
                                                                                                                
                     GEORGIA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (MP)HARTWELL LAKE POWERHOUSE, GA AND SC       17,700,000        1,284,000        8,300,000        8,300,000  
        (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                           
   (MP)RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA       586,650,000      583,700,000        1,500,000        1,500,000  
        AND SC                                                                                                  
   (MP)THURMOND LAKE POWERHOUSE, GA AND SC       69,700,000        2,018,000        4,900,000        4,900,000  
        (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                           
                                                                                                                
                      HAWAII                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (FC)ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HI                10,670,000       10,170,000          500,000          500,000  
   (FC)IAO STREAM FLOOD CONTROL, MAUI, HI        12,112,000  ...............          345,000          345,000  
        (DEF CORR)                                                                                              
    (N)KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII,        6,178,000        3,940,000        2,238,000        2,238,000  
        HI                                                                                                      
    (N)MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI                   8,810,000        1,745,000          517,000          517,000  
                                                                                                                
                     ILLINOIS                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (BE)CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL                      8,100,000        1,015,000        1,300,000  ...............  
   (FC)EAST ST LOUIS, IL                         28,563,000       22,260,000        2,300,000        2,300,000  
    (N)LOCK AND DAM 24, MISSISSIPPI RIVER,       23,430,000          768,000        3,000,000        3,000,000  
        IL AND MO (MAJOR REH                                                                                    
    (N)LOCK AND DAM 25, MISSISSIPPI RIVER,       21,150,000        6,372,000        3,000,000        3,000,000  
        IL AND MO (MAJOR REH                                                                                    
   (FC)LOVES PARK, IL                            18,300,000        8,969,000        2,000,000        2,000,000  
    (N)MELVIN PRICE LOCK AND DAM, IL AND        738,932,000      719,658,000        4,000,000        4,000,000  
        MO                                                                                                      
   (FC)O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL                      24,600,000       22,682,000        1,918,000        1,918,000  
    (N)OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, IL AND KY       1,020,000,000      165,224,000       70,352,000       70,352,000  
   (FC)REND LAKE, IL (DEF CORR)                   5,880,000          275,000          500,000          500,000  
    (N)UPPER MISS RIVER SYSTEM ENV MGMT         222,737,000      127,678,000       15,694,000       15,694,000  
        PROG, IL, IA, MO, MN                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
                     INDIANA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
    (N)BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (MAJOR          13,600,000        6,265,000        4,000,000        4,000,000  
        REHAB)                                                                                                  
   (FC)FORT WAYNE METROPOLITAN AREA, IN          33,866,000        8,553,000        7,000,000        7,000,000  
       INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, IN  ...............  ...............  ...............        2,000,000  
   (FC)LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN                 109,000,000       40,018,000       11,000,000       11,000,000  
                                                                                                                
                       IOWA                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
    (N)LOCK AND DAM 14, MISSISSIPPI RIVER,       20,700,000          642,000        2,800,000        2,800,000  
        IA (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                        
    (N)MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE          75,700,000       29,087,000        1,600,000        5,000,000  
        MITIGATION, IA, NE, K                                                                                   
   (FC)MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA,         126,723,000       93,663,000          400,000          650,000  
        NE, KS AND MO                                                                                           
   (FC)MUSCATINE ISLAND, IA                       6,540,000        1,198,000          500,000          500,000  
   (FC)PERRY CREEK, IA                           41,644,000        9,893,000        5,363,000        5,363,000  
   (FC)WEST DES MOINES, DES MOINES, IA           14,600,000       11,786,000        2,814,000        2,814,000  
                                                                                                                
                      KANSAS                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (FC)ARKANSAS CITY, KS                         28,100,000        3,025,000           50,000        1,000,000  
   (FC)WINFIELD, KS                              10,300,000        1,987,000           50,000        1,000,000  
                                                                                                                
                     KENTUCKY                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (MP)BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY         157,299,000      147,966,000        4,400,000        4,400,000  
        AND TN                                                                                                  
   (FC)DEWEY LAKE, KY (DAM SAFETY)               18,300,000        1,155,000        2,000,000        2,000,000  
    (N)MCALPINE LOCKS AND DAMS, KY AND IN       255,000,000       10,513,000        7,501,000        7,501,000  
   (FC)METROPOLITAN LOUISVILLE, POND              8,471,000        1,153,000        3,089,000  ...............  
        CREEK, KY                                                                                               
                                                                                                                
                    LOUISIANA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)ALOHA--RIGOLETTE, LA                       7,333,000        3,421,000        1,600,000        1,600,000  
   (FC)LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA      504,000,000      329,497,000        4,025,000       18,525,000  
        (HURRICANE PROTECT                                                                                      
       LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER        ...............  ...............  ...............        3,500,000  
        DISCHARGE, LA                                                                                           
   (FC)LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA               79,100,000       69,309,000          517,000          517,000  
        (HURRICANE PROTECTION)                                                                                  
    (N)MISSISSIPPI RIVER--GULF OUTLET, LA       599,000,000      103,519,000        3,100,000        3,100,000  
    (N)MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL,          161,000,000       20,420,000          752,000          752,000  
        GULF TO BATON ROUGE, L                                                                                  
   (FC)NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA                166,000,000      136,791,000        2,300,000        2,300,000  
        (HURRICANE PROTECTION)                                                                                  
   (FC)OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA                 12,500,000       10,500,000  ...............        2,600,000  
       RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK                 134,975,000      100,262,000  ...............        4,400,000  
        PROTECTION, LA                                                                                          
    (N)RED RIVER WATERWAY, MISSISSIPPI        1,886,880,000    1,659,879,000        4,800,000        8,500,000  
        RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, L                                                                                  
   (FC)SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LA                   25,000,000        2,000,000       10,000,000       10,000,000  
   (FC)WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LA              61,800,000       22,034,000        4,206,000        5,706,000  
        (HURRICANE PROTECTION)                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
                     MARYLAND                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
    (E)CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD         2,500,000          632,000          206,000          206,000  
    (E)POPLAR ISLAND, MD                        287,000,000        1,561,000       22,000,000          500,000  
                                                                                                                
                  MASSACHUSETTS                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
   (FC)HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA (MAJOR             17,100,000  ...............        5,200,000        5,200,000  
        REHAB)                                                                                                  
   (FC)ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA                 7,930,000        1,779,000        2,663,000        2,663,000  
   (FC)TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE,         27,000,000       23,863,000        3,137,000        3,137,000  
        MA                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                
                    MINNESOTA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)CHASKA, MN                                29,100,000       27,491,000        1,609,000        1,609,000  
   (FC)MARSHALL, MN                               7,220,000        1,453,000          500,000        1,000,000  
    (N)PINE RIVER DAM, CROSS LAKE, MN (DAM       14,600,000          540,000          680,000          680,000  
        SAFETY)                                                                                                 
   (FC)ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN            8,700,000        2,400,000  ...............        1,000,000  
                                                                                                                
                     MISSOURI                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO      194,000,000       81,301,000        8,300,000       12,300,000  
   (FC)CAPE GIRARDEAU--JACKSON, MO               33,300,000       24,482,000        1,000,000        1,000,000  
   (FC)MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK          16,267,000        7,301,000        1,600,000        1,600,000  
        LEVEE, MO                                                                                               
    (N)MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO          214,000,000      180,434,000        3,400,000        3,400,000  
        RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO                                                                                  
   (MP)TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO AND AR (DAM           60,200,000          900,000          460,000          460,000  
        SAFETY)                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
                     NEBRASKA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL            21,000,000        1,974,000          100,000          100,000  
        RIVER, NE AND SD                                                                                        
   (FC)WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NE               5,900,000          850,000        1,000,000  ...............  
                                                                                                                
                      NEVADA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (FC)TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV        170,000,000       19,319,000       10,260,000       10,260,000  
                                                                                                                
                    NEW JERSEY                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
   (BE)CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP,         89,400,000       11,734,000        1,965,000        1,965,000  
        NJ                                                                                                      
   (BE)GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK          343,000,000       27,514,000          380,000          380,000  
        BEACH, NJ                                                                                               
   (FC)MOLLY ANN'S BROOK AT HALEDON,             23,500,000        5,260,000        8,150,000        8,150,000  
        PROSPECT PARK AND PATERS                                                                                
   (FC)RAMAPO RIVER AT OAKLAND, NJ                9,025,000        2,079,000          250,000          250,000  
   (BE)SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ       2,196,000,000       61,894,000       24,118,000       24,118,000  
                                                                                                                
                    NEW MEXICO                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
   (FC)ABIQUIU DAM EMERGENCY GATES, NM            4,200,000          470,000        1,000,000        1,000,000  
   (FC)ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM            63,900,000       11,740,000          300,000        1,300,000  
   (FC)ALAMOGORDO, NM                            34,800,000        3,425,000          100,000          100,000  
   (FC)GALISTEO DAM, NM (DAM SAFETY)              8,300,000          265,000          150,000          150,000  
   (FC)MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION,       35,700,000        6,874,000        3,700,000        3,700,000  
        BERNALILLO TO BELE                                                                                      
   (FC)RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO        56,000,000        3,575,000          100,000          100,000  
        BOSQUE DEL APACHE,                                                                                      
   (FC)TWO RIVERS DAM, NM (DAM SAFETY)            3,020,000          220,000          250,000          250,000  
                                                                                                                
                     NEW YORK                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (BE)EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY           61,470,000       38,237,000        1,298,000        1,298,000  
        INLET AND JAMAICA BAY,                                                                                  
       FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET,    ...............  ...............  ...............        4,471,000  
        NY                                                                                                      
   (BE)FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT,      519,400,000       31,525,000       13,900,000       13,900,000  
        NY                                                                                                      
    (N)KILL VAN KULL AND NEWARK BAY             326,200,000      195,038,000          600,000          600,000  
        CHANNEL, NY AND NJ                                                                                      
    (N)NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND           130,000,000       45,196,000          100,000          100,000  
        REMOVAL OF DRIFT, NY &                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
                  NORTH CAROLINA                                                                                
                                                                                                                
    (N)AIWW--REPLACEMENT OF FEDERAL              77,100,000       47,482,000        6,400,000        6,400,000  
        HIGHWAY BRIDGES, NC                                                                                     
   (BE)CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC          177,580,000       17,831,000        6,533,000        6,533,000  
                                                                                                                
                   NORTH DAKOTA                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
   (MP)GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND          36,100,000  ...............          337,000          337,000  
        (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                           
   (FC)HOMME LAKE, ND (DAM SAFETY)                8,190,000          783,000          450,000          450,000  
   (FC)LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND       15,800,000       11,746,000        1,450,000        1,450,000  
        (DAM SAFETY)                                                                                            
   (FC)LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND        7,000,000        3,900,000        1,200,000        1,200,000  
        (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                           
   (FC)SHEYENNE RIVER, ND                        32,230,000       21,758,000          500,000          500,000  
   (FC)SOURIS RIVER, ND                         101,387,000       99,687,000        1,700,000        1,700,000  
                                                                                                                
                       OHIO                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
   (FC)BEACH CITY LAKE, MUSKINGUM RIVER           3,380,000          221,000          220,000          220,000  
        LAKES, OH (DAM SAFETY                                                                                   
   (FC)HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OH           3,306,000        1,076,000          592,000          592,000  
   (FC)METROPOLITAN REGION OF CINCINNATI,         8,688,000        1,176,000          466,000  ...............  
        DUCK CREEK, OH                                                                                          
   (FC)WEST COLUMBUS, OH                         82,400,000       19,592,000       11,400,000       11,400,000  
                                                                                                                
                     OKLAHOMA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK                     13,650,000        4,501,000        5,000,000        5,000,000  
   (FC)MINGO CREEK, TULSA, OK                    72,000,000       57,568,000        5,100,000        5,100,000  
   (MP)TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK (DAM             32,800,000        1,356,000          690,000          690,000  
        SAFETY)                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
                      OREGON                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
   (MP)BONNEVILLE POWERHOUSE PHASE I, OR         24,040,000       23,540,000          500,000          500,000  
        AND WA (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                    
   (MP)BONNEVILLE POWERHOUSE PHASE II, OR        89,100,000        5,869,000        6,600,000        6,600,000  
        AND WA (MAJOR REHAB)                                                                                    
   (MP)BONNEVILLE SECOND POWERHOUSE, OR         678,714,000      678,114,000          600,000          600,000  
        AND WA                                                                                                  
   (MP)COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING             74,400,000        9,572,000        4,300,000        4,300,000  
        ACCESS SITES, OR AND WA                                                                                 
    (N)COOS BAY, OR                               8,352,000        3,307,000        4,900,000        4,900,000  
   (FC)ELK CREEK LAKE, OR                       174,000,000      108,552,000          500,000          500,000  
                                                                                                                
                   PENNSYLVANIA                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
    (N)GRAYS LANDING LOCK AND DAM,              181,000,000      173,800,000          100,000          100,000  
        MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA                                                                                   
   (FC)JOHNSTOWN, PA (MAJOR REHAB)               32,500,000        1,128,000        2,200,000        2,200,000  
   (FC)LACKAWANNA RIVER, OLYPHANT, PA            10,900,000        2,112,000          610,000          610,000  
   (FC)LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA            15,400,000        2,375,000          358,000          358,000  
    (N)LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4,               645,000,000       28,260,000       17,100,000       18,700,000  
        MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA                                                                                   
   (BE)PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, PA                63,035,000       15,094,000          485,000          485,000  
        (PERMANENT)                                                                                             
   (FC)SAW MILL RUN, PITTSBURGH, PA               7,050,000        2,034,000          500,000  ...............  
   (FC)WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING)       100,000,000       15,438,000       14,063,000       14,063,000  
                                                                                                                
                   PUERTO RICO                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
   (FC)ARECIBO RIVER, PR                         11,700,000        1,043,000          350,000  ...............  
   (FC)PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR          416,500,000      352,059,000        7,500,000        7,500,000  
   (FC)RIO DE LA PLATA, PR                       62,400,000        4,006,000          600,000          600,000  
   (FC)RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR                   89,050,000        2,679,000        2,540,000  ...............  
   (FC)RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR                     322,100,000       16,948,000        7,663,000        7,663,000  
                                                                                                                
                  SOUTH CAROLINA                                                                                
                                                                                                                
   (BE)MYRTLE BEACH, SC                         140,535,000       14,422,000       13,000,000       13,000,000  
                                                                                                                
                   SOUTH DAKOTA                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
   (FC)BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD          17,150,000        1,498,000        2,200,000  ...............  
                                                                                                                
                      TEXAS                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
   (FC)BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX                4,436,000        3,040,000        1,396,000        1,396,000  
    (N)CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX                   22,500,000        6,529,000        9,550,000        9,550,000  
   (FC)CLEAR CREEK, TX                           68,800,000       16,098,000        1,700,000        1,700,000  
   (FC)EL PASO, TX                              113,400,000       89,226,000        8,200,000        8,200,000  
    (N)GIWW--SARGENT BEACH, TX                   58,600,000       30,432,000       18,300,000       18,300,000  
   (FC)MCGRATH CREEK, WICHITA FALLS, TX           7,580,000        2,916,000          900,000          900,000  
   (FC)RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX                     317,450,000      314,446,000        3,004,000        3,004,000  
       RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX AND       225,000,000       40,818,000  ...............        4,500,000  
        OK                                                                                                      
   (MP)SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX         36,914,000       35,714,000        1,200,000        1,200,000  
        (DAM SAFETY)                                                                                            
   (FC)SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX      147,410,000      145,810,000        1,600,000        1,600,000  
   (FC)SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX                  203,600,000       35,484,000       11,200,000       11,200,000  
   (FC)WACO LAKE, TX (DAM SAFETY)                10,100,000          380,000          300,000          300,000  
       WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX                 ...............  ...............  ...............        5,000,000  
                                                                                                                
                       UTAH                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
   (FC)LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT                 ...............  ...............  ...............        4,000,000  
                                                                                                                
                     VIRGINIA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)JAMES R OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT,       34,500,000       16,242,000        6,800,000        6,800,000  
        VA                                                                                                      
    (N)NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS              137,400,000       18,226,000        1,200,000        1,200,000  
        (DEEPENING), VA                                                                                         
       RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA        ...............  ...............  ...............        3,500,000  
   (FC)ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN,                23,500,000        4,432,000        1,100,000        1,100,000  
        HEADWATERS AREA, VA                                                                                     
       VIRGINIA BEACH, VA                   ...............  ...............  ...............        6,000,000  
   (BE)VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (REIMBURSEMENT)         7,461,000        6,974,000          487,000          487,000  
                                                                                                                
                    WASHINGTON                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
   (MP)COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA,    1,382,217,000      294,113,000      107,000,000      107,000,000  
        OR AND ID                                                                                               
   (FC)HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA (DAM SAFETY)         1,760,000          360,000        1,400,000        1,400,000  
   (MP)LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE      232,000,000      220,810,000        3,600,000        3,600,000  
        COMPENSATION, WA, OR                                                                                    
   (MP)THE DALLES POWERHOUSE (UNITS 1-14),       86,000,000  ...............        3,000,000        3,000,000  
        WA AND OR (MAJOR REH                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
                  WEST VIRGINIA                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
   (FC)LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER         1,559,728,000      565,545,000        6,921,000       38,526,000  
        CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, V                                                                                 
   (FC)MOOREFIELD, WV                            18,000,000        8,939,000        6,385,000        6,385,000  
   (FC)PETERSBURG, WV                            17,900,000       13,384,000        4,516,000        4,516,000  
    (N)ROBERT C BYRD LOCKS AND DAM, WV AND      373,000,000      319,832,000       12,158,000       12,158,000  
        OH                                                                                                      
    (N)WINFIELD LOCKS AND DAM, WV               225,600,000      168,530,000       30,900,000       30,900,000  
                                                                                                                
                    WISCONSIN                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
   (FC)PORTAGE, WI                                6,620,000        2,148,000        1,700,000        1,700,000  
                                                                                                                
                  MISCELLANEOUS                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
       AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM        ...............  ...............        2,500,000        4,000,000  
       BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS       ...............  ...............        3,000,000        4,700,000  
        (SECTION 103)                                                                                           
       BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL  ...............  ...............        4,000,000        4,000,000  
        (SECTION 204)                                                                                           
       CLEARING AND SNAGGING PROJECT        ...............  ...............          500,000          500,000  
       DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE PROGRAM         ...............  ...............        2,000,000        2,000,000  
       EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE   ...............  ...............        7,500,000        8,500,000  
        PROTECTION (SEC. 14)                                                                                    
       EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION              ...............  ...............       18,892,000       18,892,000  
       FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION      ...............  ...............       24,500,000       32,650,000  
        205)                                                                                                    
       INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--BOARD  ...............  ...............           40,000           40,000  
        EXPENSES                                                                                                
       INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--CORPS  ...............  ...............          185,000          185,000  
        EXPENSES                                                                                                
       NAVIGATION MITIGATION PROJECT        ...............  ...............          500,000          500,000  
       NAVIGATION PROJECTS (SECTION 107)    ...............  ...............        5,000,000        9,632,000  
       PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR            ...............  ...............       15,000,000       17,280,000  
        IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONME                                                                            
       REDUCTION FOR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS    ...............  ...............      -46,716,000      -46,716,000  
        AND SLIPPAGE                                                                                            
                                           =====================================================================
             TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION GENERAL    ...............  ...............      914,000,000    1,024,195,000  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TYPE OF PROJECT:                                                                                         
           (N)  NAVIGATION                                                                                      
           (BE)  BEACH EROSION CONTROL                                                                          
           (FC)  FLOOD CONTROL                                                                                  
           (MP)  MULTIPURPOSE, INCLUDING POWER                                                                  

    Dillingham, AK, shoreline erosion.--The Committee has 
included $3,302,000 for the Corps of Engineers to continue the 
Dillingham, AK, shoreline erosion control project in the 
vicinity of Snag Point. The Committee understands that serious 
erosion is endangering sewer lines, homes and businesses along 
a 1,500 foot section of shoreline near Snag Point.
    McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation system (Montgomery 
Point lock and dam), Arkansas.--The bill includes $5,886,000 
for the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project, as 
proposed in the budget request.
    Red River emergency bank protection, Arkansas.--An 
appropriation of $6,000,000 is included in the bill for the 
Corps of Engineers to initiate and complete construction of the 
Dickson revetment feature of the Red River emergency bank 
protection project in Arkansas.
    Los Angeles Harbor, CA.--An appropriation of $10,000,000 is 
recommended for the Los Angeles Harbor project in California. 
This is $9,150,000 over the budget for fiscal year 1997. This 
is a good example for the impact of current and future budget 
constraints have on providing for the infrastructure needs of 
the nation. The Committee understands that the Corps of 
Engineers could utilize nearly $30,000,000 to maintain 
efficient progress on this project which contributes billions 
of dollars to the national economy through export and import of 
goods, direct and indirect employment, and associated economic 
activity generated in the region. Yet, the Committee is unable 
to provided the full amount required for 1997, and budget 
profiles for the next several years project a continued decline 
in available resources to support projects such as the Los 
Angeles Harbor that contribute so much to the national economy.
    Sacramento River flood control project, (Glenn-Colusa 
irrigation district), California.--The Committee has provided 
$2,000,000, the same as the budget request for the Corps of 
Engineers to continue construction on the riffle restoration 
project.
    Kissimmee River restoration, Florida.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $3,000,000 for the Corps of Engineers 
to continue the Kissimmee River restoration project in Florida. 
This is the same amount as included in the budget request.
    Lee County, FL, (Captiva Island).--An amount of $1,000,000 
has been included in the Committee recommendation to reimburse 
the Federal share of costs for the renourishment of the beach 
at Captiva Island, FL.
    McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL.--While the budget 
request for the McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL, project 
does not include a request for new funding, the Committee 
understands that $6,655,000 of previously appropriated funding 
is available and adequate to undertake scheduled activities in 
fiscal year 1997.
    Arkansas City, KS, and Winfield, KS.--The Committee is 
aware of the severe flooding problems in Arkansas City and 
Winfield, KS, and the urgent need to provide flood protection 
in those areas. Therefore, the Committee has provided 
$1,000,000 for each of these projects to accelerate 
construction. The Secretary of the Army is directed to initiate 
construction on the first of two contracts for each project on 
an accelerated basis if the non-Federal sponsor is able to 
acquire necessary lands by the second quarter of fiscal year 
1997.
    The Committee has recommended a provision in the bill to 
increase the cost ceiling for this project.
    Lake Pontchartrain storm water discharge, Louisiana.--The 
Committee has included $3,500,000 to continue the development 
of the Lake Pontchartrain storm water discharge project in 
Louisiana.
    Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, Louisiana.--The Committee 
has provided an additional $14,300,000 for this project of 
which is to be used by the Corps of Engineers to continue 
construction of parallel protection along the Orleans Avenue 
and London Avenue Outfall canals.
    Ouachita River levees, Louisiana.--The Committee recommends 
an appropriation of $2,600,000 for the Corps of Engineers to 
award and complete construction of levee raising from Bastrop 
to Monroe items 1 and 2 in Louisiana.
    Red River Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA.--
An appropriation of $8,500,000 is recommended for the Red River 
Waterway, LA, project. The Committee recognizes the economic 
tourism development of the waterway region is critical to 
provide the full value to the Nation. Therefore, an additional 
$3,700,000 has been provided for the design and construction of 
the visitor center and interpretive displays and exhibits, and 
to subsequently initiate continuing contracts, not to be 
considered fully funded, for a regional visitor center at 
Shreveport, LA, as specified by Public Law 104-46, and an 
enhanced recreation site with appropriate project oriented 
exhibits and displays at Grand Ecore, near Nachitoches, LA, as 
specified in the Red River Waterway master plan for recreation.
    Both center and site are to be constructed at full Federal 
expense. Engineering, design, and construction need not await 
completion of the recreation master plan supplement and project 
cooperation agreement for pools 3-5 recreation development. The 
center will provide educational information to the public on 
the Red River Waterway project, the Red River basin, and 
national and local water resources development by the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.
    Red River emergency bank protection, Louisiana.--The 
Committee recommendation for the Red River emergency bank 
protection project in Louisiana includes $3,900,000 for the 
Corps to design and construct the Cat Island revetment, and 
$500,000 for the Corps to undertake a sediment transport study 
on the stretch of the Red River from Denison Dam to Index, AR. 
The sediment transport study is needed to determine if bank 
erosion sediment entering the river above Index, AR, is being 
transported into the navigation channel at Shreveport, thereby 
increasing the maintenance dredging costs associated with the 
Red River Waterway project.
    Missouri River levee system, L-385, Missouri.--The 
Committee directs the Corps to proceed with completion of 
engineering and design on the L-385, Riverside/Quindaro Bend 
levee project.
    St. Charles County flood control project, Missouri.--The 
Committee is aware of the severe flood damages suffered during 
the floods of 1993 and 1995 in the St. Charles County, MO, 
peninsual affecting homes, businesses, critical infrastructure, 
and cropland. The Committee has added $250,000 to the Missouri 
River levee system, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri 
project to initiate detailed engineering and design including 
preparation of the general reevaluation report and related NEPA 
compliance documentation for the L-15 levee unit of the 
Missouri River levee system project.
    North Jefferson City, MO.--The Committee understands that 
there have been delays on the L-142, North Jefferson City levee 
and encourage the Corps to proceed expeditiously to complete 
the economic analysis and feasibility study.
    Poplar Island, MD, (sec. 204).--The Committee understands 
that use of the $22,000,000 budget request for the Poplar 
Island, MD, project is contingent upon enactment of authorizing 
legislation which would resolve significant policy issues and 
provide an assured funding stream for the project. The 
Committee has reduced, without prejudice, the recommended 
funding to $500,000. The $500,000 has been provided under the 
authority of section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992, in an effort to keep the project moving forward until 
authorizing legislation is in place. The Corps of Engineers is 
directed to use the funding to continue essential activities 
related to water quality certification requirements, coordinate 
with the non-Federal project sponsor and various interested 
parties, and to evaluate alternative construction sequences 
(phases versus nonphased) to determine associated impacts on 
project costs, financing, and construction activities.
    Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation, Iowa, 
Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri.--The Committee has provided 
$5,000,000 for the Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation 
project. The Corps is directed to use the additional funds to 
expedite those elements which are ready for construction 
funding.
    Acequias irrigation system, New Mexico.--The Committee has 
provided $1,300,000 for the acequias irrigation system in New 
Mexico in order to continue progress on this important project.
    Red River basin chloride control, Texas.--The Committee 
believes that there is an urgent need to accelerate 
construction of the Red River basin chloride control project. 
Therefore, the Committee has provided $4,500,000 for the award 
and first year's execution of a contract for construction of 
the Crowell Brine Lake embankment, spillway, and access roads. 
In addition, the Committee is aware that the Army Corps of 
Engineers will carry over $5,400,000 into fiscal year 1997 
which will be used to continue engineering and design and award 
construction contracts of the collection facilities at areas 
VII and IX.
    Columbia River juvenile fish mitigation, Washington, 
Oregon, and Idaho.--The Committee continues to support the 
Columbia River juvenile fish mitigation program and has 
provided the full budget request of $107,000,000 to continue 
the project in fiscal 1997. A significant portion of the funds 
will be used to investigate new technologies and approaches to 
improve juvenile fish survival at the Federal projects on the 
Columbia and Snake Rivers. In particular, the Committee 
supports the testing and installation of surface bypass 
facilities at several of the projects and understands that they 
may hold great promise for improving fish survival in the 
system.
    The Corps is directed to continue its work on gas abatement 
measures, including the construction of spillway flip lips at 
Ice Harbor and John Day Dams. The Committee encourages efforts 
to continue improving monitoring of dissolved gas levels at the 
projects, and directs the Corps to work with the National 
Marine Fisheries Service, the Northwest Power Planning Council, 
States, and tribes to further improve the current physical gas 
monitoring and reporting system.
    In addition, the Committee supports the construction of 
passive integrated transponder [PIT] tag detectors at the John 
Day and Bonneville projects. The Committee understands that the 
Corps' cost estimate for the construction of the John Day PIT 
tag facility has been revised upward due to recently discovered 
problems at the construction site. The Committee considers this 
facility to be a high priority, and directs the Corps to 
allocate sufficient funds within the overall program to ensure 
that the facility is completed no later than October 1997.
    The Committee strongly encourages the Corps to carry out 
all its activities associated with the program in a manner that 
is based upon the best available science, and fosters consensus 
among the affected States, Indian tribes, Federal agencies, and 
the council. The Corps should pursue procedures for reaching 
technical consensus, including dispute resolution procedures, 
that have been used to address other anadromous fish-related 
issues in the Columbia basin. In consultation with affected 
States, the council, Indian tribes, and Federal agencies, the 
Corps shall report to the Committee prior to the Committee's 
hearings on the fiscal year 1998 budget regarding these 
efforts. The report should take into consideration the views of 
all participants.
    The Committee is aware that the Corps has generally had 
difficulty contracting with Indian tribes to carry out fish and 
wildlife actions, such as evaluation of water temperature 
conditions in the Snake River in relation to adult migration of 
salmon, or in the protection of tribal cultural resources. In 
the past, research proposals submitted by the tribes, fully 
peer reviewed, and accepted by the region for scientific merit 
have not been funded by the Corps apparently due to limitations 
in the Corps' authorities. The Committee directs the Corps to 
establish contract mechanisms under its existing authorities to 
carry out such work expeditiously with affected Indian tribes, 
or report to the appropriate committees of Congress on the 
changes in authority which are necessary to initiate the 
contracts.
    In prior years, the Committee has encouraged the Corps to 
investigate the efficacy of underwater sound generating 
acoustic guidance systems and underwater strobe lighting 
guidance systems to help decrease fish mortality at the 
Columbia and Snake River projects. The Committee is not aware, 
however, of any significant tests or studies that the Corps has 
initiated at the projects themselves. Recent improvements have 
been made in both technologies, and the Committee directs the 
Corps to fully investigate the feasibility of both guidance 
technologies, with additional laboratory research, at one or 
more of its projects on the Columbia or Snake Rivers.
    The Committee is concerned that the Corps continues to be 
unable to meet critical milestones for completion of important 
components of salmon recovery program. The Committee cannot 
over emphasize the importance and need for the Corps to meet 
deadlines on critical features and urges the Corps to take 
appropriate actions to ensure future critical milestones are 
met.
    Finally, the Committee is very disappointed the Secretary 
of the Army and the Corps of Engineers has not responded to 
language contained in the conference report on the fiscal year 
1996 Energy and Water Development appropriations bill which 
directed the development of a set of recommendations for 
improving the system by which fish passage improvements in the 
Columbia River power system are designed, tested, and 
implemented. Recent issues involving the installation of a 
prototype surface collectors at lower Granite Dam and the 
installation of the John Day juvenile fish sampling and 
monitoring facility have heightened the concerns of the 
Committee.
    The Committee believes it appropriate to have an 
independent entity that has engineering experience and 
familiarity with current practices of the Army Corps of 
Engineers, the Bonneville Power Administration, the National 
Marine Fisheries Service, and other Federal agencies and the 
private sector to develop an objective independent report to 
identify specific recommendations that, if implemented, would 
shorten the time requirements, reduce the costs, and improve 
the biological success of fish passage projects. The report 
should include an evaluation of how projects are identified, 
moved through the Federal and regional review process, and 
ultimately selected for construction. The report shall include 
not only Corps, BPA, NMFS, and other Federal agencies, but also 
State and tribal elements that combine to result in the 
development and installation of fish facilities along the 
entire Columbia River power system. Further, the Committee 
believes that the involvement of a variety of interests is 
essential in developing this report and should consider the 
views of States, tribes, utilities, and environmental 
interests. The Committee expects all parties to work closely 
and collaboratively in this effort.
    Elk Creek Dam, OR.--The Committee is aware that the Elk 
Creek Dam in southern Oregon was authorized as part of a three 
dam system for flood control in the Rogue River basin, and that 
two of the three dams have been completed and that Elk Creek 
Dam is over one-half completed. Despite completion of several 
NEPA documents on the Elk Creek project, construction was 
enjoined by a Federal district court in 1987. This injunction 
was upheld recently by the ninth circuit court of appeals which 
directed that another supplemental EIS be completed. The 
Committee is informed by the Corps of Engineers that 
significant funding and effort would be required to address 
issues raised by the court without certainty of success in 
future court decisions.
    In light of this fact, the Committee had included language 
in the bill to enable the Corps to utilize $2,500,000 of funds 
previously appropriated for the Elk Creek project to undertake 
appropriate engineering, biological, and environmental studies 
of options to manage the project in its uncompleted state.
    Little Dell Lake, UT.--The Committee has included an 
appropriation of $4,000,000 to complete construction of 
recreation facilities at the Little Dell Lake, UT, project, and 
reimbursement to the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake 
City consistent with supplement No. 3 to design memorandum No. 
4 titled ``Little Dell Lake-Recreation, Salt Lake City Streams, 
Utah'' dated September 1995. The cost allocation and cost 
apportionment shall be consistent with Public Law 99-662 and 
the figures shown in supplement No. 3.
    Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Upper 
Cumberland River, WV-KY-VA.--The Committee has provided a total 
of $38,521,000 for the Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy 
River and Upper Cumberland River project.
    In addition to amounts provided in the budget request, the 
bill includes $10,000,000 to continue the Harlan, KY, element 
of the project; $4,700,000 for the Williamsburg, KY, element of 
the project; $3,000,000 for the Pike County (Tug Fork) element; 
and $4,00,000 for continuation of flood proofing on the 
Middlesboro, KY, element of the project. In addition, the Corps 
is directed to continue construction of the Pike County, KY, 
element using funds previously appropriated.
    The Committee recommendation also includes $4,000,000 for 
the Upper Mingo County, WV, element; $4,200,000 for the Lower 
Mingo (Kermit), WV, element and $1,600,000 for the Hatfield 
Bottom, WV, nonstructural element of the Levisa and Tug Forks 
of the Big Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River, (sec. 202) 
project, and $105,000 for the Lower Mingo, WV, tributaries 
supplement to the detail project report.
    Aquatic plant control program.--The Committee has included 
$4,000,000 to continue the aquatic plant control program. In 
light of severe budget constraints and the fact that this is a 
nationwide program, the Committee believes it inappropriate to 
earmark the small amount of funding available for fiscal year 
1997. The appropriations are to undertake the highest priority 
activities.
    Small flood control projects, (sec. 205).--The Committee 
recommendation for section 205 small flood control projects is 
$32,650,000.
    The Committee recommendation includes $3,900,000 to 
complete construction of the Muscle Shoals, AL, project; 
$150,000 each for the Elba and Geneva, AL, levee rehabilitation 
projects; $2,950,000 for the Corps to initiate construction of 
the St. Peters, MO, Old Town levee project; $100,000 to 
initiate and complete a feasibility study of nonstructural 
solutions to flooding in Lincoln County, MT; an additional 
$3,100,000 over the $270,000 included in the budget for the 
Cedar River, Renton, WA, project to complete plans and 
specifications and initiate construction; and $500,000 each for 
the Corps to plan and install early flood warning systems for 
the Cheat River and Greenbrier River basins in West Virginia 
which the Committee understands will be done at full Federal 
expense. Further, the Corps is directed to use $25,000 of funds 
provided to perform a combined reconnaissance/feasibility study 
to further assess the flood control problems along the Mahoning 
River in the vicinity of Struthers, OH.
    Small navigation projects, (sec. 107).--An appropriation of 
$9,632,000 is recommended for small navigation projects, 
section 107, projects. The Committee recommendation includes 
$2,000,000 for construction of Ouzinkie Harbor, AK; $2,000,000 
for construction of Larsen Bay Harbor, AK; $120,000 for 
initiation of plans and specification for the King Cove Harbor, 
AK, project; $212,000 to complete the feasibility report and 
initiate plans and specification on the Whittier Harbor, AK, 
project; $124,000 to complete the feasibility study on the 
Tatitlik Harbor, AK, project; and $176,000 to complete the 
feasibility report and initiate plans and specifications for 
the Tamgas Harbor, AK, project.
    Emergency streambank and shoreline protection, (sec. 14).--
The Committee recommendation for section 14, emergency 
streambank and shoreline protection projects is $8,500,000. The 
recommendation includes the full budget request of $278,000 for 
the Wash-on-the-Brazos, TX, project; $310,000 for the Manitou 
Beach Drive and Murden Cove Road bulkhead repair in Bainbridge 
Island, WA; and $400,000 to initiate and complete the Emmonak, 
AK project.
    Beach erosion control, (sec. 103).--An appropriation of 
$4,700,000 is recommended for beach erosion control, section 
103 projects for fiscal year 1997. The Committee has included 
$1,700,000 to complete the Lummi Shore Road, Lumi Indian 
Reservation, WA, project.
    Projects modifications for improvement of the environment, 
(sec. 1135).--The Committee has provided a total of $17,280,000 
for section 1135, projects modifications for improvements of 
the environment. The recommendation includes $1,000,000 for the 
Valdez Harbor, AK, intertidal water retention project; 
$1,700,000 for the Amazon Creek restoration project in Oregon; 
$100,000 for the Numana Dam fish passage project in Nevada; and 
$180,000 for the Bernado Waterfowl Management Area in New 
Mexico.
    Shoreline protection policy.--The Committee is equally 
troubled by the administration's proposals to terminate the 
Federal role in shore protection projects and smaller 
navigation projects. While these proposals would only directly 
affect the coastal States, including the Great Lakes States, 
the impacts of terminating the Federal Government's role in 
protecting our shorelines and maintaining small boat harbors 
would be felt throughout the Nation. The Committee also 
strongly rejects these proposals.

 Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries Arkansas, Illinois, 
       Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $307,885,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     292,500,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             312,513,000

    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:

                                          CORPS OF ENGINEERS--FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES                                          
                                                                  [Amounts in dollars]                                                                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Benefit                                                                                      
Type of                   Project title                      cost     Total Federal     Allocated to     Current year   Budget estimate     Committee   
project                                                     ratio          cost             date          allocation                      recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                                        
                    GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                        
       SURVEYS:                                                                                                                                         
           GENERAL STUDIES:                                                                                                                             
  (FDP)        MORGANZA, LA TO THE GULF OF MEXICO       .........       4,805,000        1,718,000          500,000          965,000          965,000   
  (FDP)        MISSISSIPPI DELTA, MS                    .........       7,377,000        7,039,000          990,000          338,000          338,000   
  (FDP)        REELFOOT LAKE, TN                        .........       2,092,000        1,305,000          221,000          350,000          350,000   
  (FDP)        WOLF RIVER, MEMPHIS, TN                  .........       2,130,000          475,000   ...............         130,000          130,000   
           COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA           .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         335,000          335,000   
       PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN:                                                                                                          
   (FC)    EASTERN ARKANSAS REGION (COMPREHENSIVE            1.15     204,750,000        9,212,000        2,104,000          788,000          788,000   
            STUDY), AR                                                                                                                                  
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             SUBTOTAL, GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS           .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       2,906,000        2,906,000   
                                                       =================================================================================================
                         CONSTRUCTION                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO AND      33.30   3,570,000,000    2,398,957,000       48,136,000       50,800,000       50,800,000   
        TN                                                                                                                                              
   (FC)EIGHT MILE CREEK, AR                                  2.30       8,570,000        2,262,000          198,000          841,000          841,000   
   (FC)HELENA AND VICINITY, AR                               2.00       7,700,000        2,025,000   ...............         150,000   ...............  
   (FC)MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS,        33.30   1,452,000,000      775,385,000       30,741,000       24,369,000       26,669,000   
        MO AND TN                                                                                                                                       
   (FC)ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO                           1.20     381,000,000      343,435,000        8,300,000        8,900,000        8,900,000   
   (FC)WHITEMAN'S CREEK, AR                                  6.90       3,300,000          869,000          325,000        1,000,000        1,000,000   
   (FC)ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA               33.30     172,000,000       47,629,000        4,701,000        5,020,000        5,020,000   
   (FC)ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA                                33.30   1,650,000,000      781,790,000       21,948,000       18,600,000       18,600,000   
   (FC)MISSISSIPPI AND LOUISIANA ESTUARINE AREAS, LA         1.70      59,000,000        6,933,000          500,000          800,000          800,000   
        AND MS                                                                                                                                          
   (FC)MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA                          5.30      93,700,000       44,393,000       11,296,000       11,800,000       11,800,000   
   (FC)TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA                 2.00     167,428,000       88,597,000        9,355,000       11,393,000       11,393,000   
       YAZOO BASIN, MS:                                 .........  (1,320,271,000)    (608,867,000)     (43,670,000)     (33,164,000)     (33,164,000)  
   (FC)    BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU, MS                    1.30     214,115,000       59,071,000   ...............          20,000           20,000   
   (FC)    BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS                           1.30     100,215,000       76,584,000        6,063,000        6,807,000       11,000,000   
   (FC)    DEMONSTRATION EROSION CONTROL, MS                 1.30     206,701,000      194,001,000       21,169,000       12,700,000       20,000,000   
   (FC)    F&WL MITIGATION LANDS, MS                         1.30       7,304,000        5,803,000          232,000          480,000          480,000   
   (FC)    MAIN STEM, MS                                     1.30     203,200,000       34,494,000           22,000           25,000           25,000   
   (FC)    REFORMULATION UNIT, MS                            1.30      32,408,000       20,540,000        1,323,000        3,459,000        3,459,000   
   (FC)    TRIBUTARIES, MS                                   1.30     244,228,000      106,800,000        2,867,000          904,000          904,000   
   (FC)    UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS                          1.30     312,100,000      111,574,000       11,994,000        8,769,000       14,000,000   
   (FC)NONCONNAH CREEK, FLOOD CONTROL FEATURE, TN AND        4.80      18,400,000        9,893,000          662,000        4,000,000        4,000,000   
        MS                                                                                                                                              
   (FC)WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN                          80     131,000,000       47,558,000        1,120,000        3,024,000        3,024,000   
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION                     .........  ...............  ...............  ...............     173,861,000      192,735,000   
                                                       =================================================================================================
                         MAINTENANCE                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                        
   (FC)CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO AND  .........  ...............  ...............  ...............      65,101,000       65,101,000   
        TN                                                                                                                                              
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         475,000          475,000   
   (FC)LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER--NORTH BANK, AR             .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         156,000          156,000   
   (FC)LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER--SOUTH BANK, AR             .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         121,000          121,000   
   (FC)MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS,    .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       5,458,000        5,458,000   
        MO AND TN                                                                                                                                       
   (FC)ST FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, AR AND MO                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       9,815,000        9,815,000   
   (FC)TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR AND    .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       2,631,000        2,631,000   
        LA                                                                                                                                              
   (FC)WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR                        .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       1,300,000        1,300,000   
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............          50,000           50,000   
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............          28,000           28,000   
   (FC)ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA            .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         150,000          150,000   
   (FC)ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA                            .........  ...............  ...............  ...............      12,223,000       12,223,000   
   (FC)BATON ROUGE HARBOR--DEVIL SWAMP, LA              .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         172,000          172,000   
   (FC)BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA               .........  ...............  ...............  ...............          92,000           92,000   
   (FC)BONNET CARRE, LA                                 .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       1,228,000        1,228,000   
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         415,000          415,000   
   (FC)LOWER RED RIVER--SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA           .........  ...............  ...............  ...............          56,000           56,000   
   (FC)MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA         .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         261,000          261,000   
   (FC)OLD RIVER, LA                                    .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       5,025,000        5,025,000   
   (FC)TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA            .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       2,849,000        2,849,000   
    (N)GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS                            .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         239,000          239,000   
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         195,000          195,000   
    (N)VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS                             .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         122,000          122,000   
       YAZOO BASIN, MS:                                 .........  ...............  ...............  ...............     (18,658,000)     (18,658,000)  
   (FC)    ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS                           .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       2,838,000        2,838,000   
   (FC)    BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS                      .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         668,000        1,700,000   
   (FC)    ENID LAKE, MS                                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       2,821,000        2,821,000   
   (FC)    GREENWOOD, MS                                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         751,000          751,000   
   (FC)    GRENADA LAKE, MS                             .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       3,783,000        3,783,000   
   (FC)    MAIN STEM, MS                                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         936,000          936,000   
   (FC)    SARDIS LAKE, MS                              .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       3,946,000        3,946,000   
   (FC)    TRIBUTARIES, MS                              .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       1,287,000        1,287,000   
   (FC)    WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS              .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         485,000          485,000   
   (FC)    YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS                     .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         393,000          500,000   
   (FC)    YAZOO CITY, MS                               .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         750,000          750,000   
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         223,000          223,000   
   (FC)WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO                              .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       3,545,000        3,545,000   
   (FC)INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN                .........  ...............  ...............  ...............         129,000          129,000   
    (N)MEMPHIS HARBOR (MCKELLAR LAKE), TN               .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       1,700,000        1,700,000   
   (FC)MAPPING                                          .........  ...............  ...............  ...............       1,064,000        1,064,000   
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             SUBTOTAL, MAINTENANCE                      .........  ...............  ...............  ...............     133,481,000      134,620,000   
                                                       =================================================================================================
       REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE               .........  ...............  ...............  ...............     -17,748,000      -17,748,000   
                                                       =================================================================================================
             TOTAL, FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER    .........  ...............  ...............  ...............     292,500,000      312,513,000   
              AND TRIBUTAR-  IES                                                                                                                        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TYPE OF PROJECT:                                                                                                                                 
           (N)  NAVIGATION                                                                                                                              
           (FC)  FLOOD CONTROL                                                                                                                          

    Big Black River, MS.--The Committee is informed that 
recurring flooding of the Big Black River south of Vaiden, MS, 
has resulted in decreased economic opportunities for residents 
of that region. The Corps shall provide the Committee with a 
report not later than January 31, 1997, which provides details 
on the nature of the problem, options to solve the flooding 
problem and associated costs for each option, and statutory 
authority for the Corps to do the work necessary to resolve the 
problem.
    Mississippi River levees, MR&T.--The Committee has included 
an additional $2,300,000 for the Corps to undertake additional 
work in Mississippi including Wilson Point-Lookout Point item 
489R, State line-Wilson Point item 506R, and item 501L.
    Yazoo basin projects, Mississippi.--The Committee notes the 
reduction in funding for many Yazoo basin projects from last 
year's planned levels and is concerned that these reductions 
could result in schedule slippages, thus increasing the risks 
of flood damages in this region. Accordingly, the Committee 
requests a report from the Corps of Engineers not later than 
January 31, 1997, which provides information on the effects of 
reduced funding for the Mississippi River levee enlargement 
projects and all Yazoo basin construction and operations and 
maintenance projects. This report shall include, but not be 
limited to, the effect of the reduced funding on project 
schedules.
    Demonstration erosion control, MR&T.--The Committee is very 
concerned by the significant decrease in funding for the 
demonstration erosion control project, and does not endorse 
plans by the Corps of Engineers to eliminate this funding 
entirely in fiscal year 1998. Accordingly, the Committee has 
added an additional $7,300,000 for the Demonstration Erosion 
Control Program, and directs that from the funds provided the 
Corps immediately initiate maintenance procedures to alleviate 
the backwater flooding on the Yalobusha River in Calhoun 
County, MS.
    Yazoo basin, MS, Big Sunflower River, including Steele 
Bayou.--The Committee has included an additional $4,193,000 for 
the Corps to undertake additional work including, Steele Bayou 
item 66A/B phase III, Robert Shaw ditch, and main canal item 2 
channel.
    Yazoo basin, Upper Yazoo projects, MS.--The bill includes 
$14,000,000 for the Upper Yazoo projects to continue items 3A-2 
and item 3B in Yazoo River, Alligator-Catfish Bayou water 
control structure and other related work.
    The Committee has included language in the bill to direct 
that the variable cost recovery rate be used to establish the 
rates charged for the Mississippi River Commission aircraft in 
accordance with OMB Circular A-126, appendix A. The Committee 
understands that use of the variable cost recovery rate in 
accordance with OMB Circular A-126 will result in more use of 
the aircraft by other agencies and offices of the Corps when 
operations costs are less than the cost of commercial travel, 
therefore, providing net saving in the cost of Government 
travel.

                   operation and maintenance, general

Appropriations, 1996....................................  $1,703,697,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................   1,663,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           1,700,358,000

    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:

         CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL         
                          [Amounts in dollars]                          
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Budget         Committee  
              Project title                  estimate     recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        
                 ALABAMA                                                
                                                                        
ALABAMA--COOSA RIVER, AL................       5,839,000       5,839,000
BAYOU CODEN, AL.........................           5,000           5,000
BAYOU LA BATRE, AL......................           5,000           5,000
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL..      16,693,000      16,693,000
DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL.................         550,000         550,000
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL..........       3,054,000       3,054,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL.......          35,000          35,000
MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM--WILLIAM                                     
 ``BILL'' DANNELLY LAKE.................       6,647,000       6,647,000
MOBILE HARBOR, AL.......................      17,918,000      17,918,000
PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL................         899,000         899,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL...........         392,000         392,000
ROBERT F HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL.........       4,491,000       4,491,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL.....          90,000          90,000
TENNESSEE--TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS      19,192,000      19,192,000
WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA.       5,972,000       5,972,000
                                                                        
                 ALASKA                                                 
                                                                        
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK....................       1,200,000       1,200,000
BETHEL HARBOR, AK.......................         325,000         325,000
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK...................       1,726,000       1,726,000
CRESCENT BAY HARBOR, SITKA, AK..........          70,000          70,000
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK...................         551,000         551,000
DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK......................         396,000         396,000
DRY PASS, AK............................         345,000         345,000
HOMER HARBOR, AK........................         233,000         233,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK.......          24,000          24,000
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK....................         181,000         181,000
NOME HARBOR, AK.........................         260,000         260,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK...........         565,000         565,000
                                                                        
                 ARIZONA                                                
                                                                        
ALAMO LAKE, AZ..........................       1,069,000       1,069,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ.......          72,000          72,000
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ....................       1,136,000       1,136,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ.....          70,000          70,000
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ...................         112,000         112,000
                                                                        
                ARKANSAS                                                
                                                                        
BEAVER LAKE, AR.........................       3,961,000       3,961,000
BLAKELY MT DAM--LAKE OUACHITA, AR.......       4,595,000       4,595,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..................       1,088,000       1,088,000
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR....................       4,416,000       4,416,000
DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM, AR.............       5,793,000       5,793,000
DEGRAY LAKE, AR.........................       4,088,000       4,088,000
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR........................       1,051,000       1,051,000
DIERKS LAKE, AR.........................       1,034,000       1,034,000
GILLHAM LAKE, AR........................         995,000         995,000
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR...................       4,264,000       4,264,000
HELENA HARBOR, AR.......................         455,000         455,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......         209,000         209,000
MCCLELLAN--KERR ARKANSAS RIVER                                          
 NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR..................      24,155,000      24,155,000
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR.......................       1,743,000       1,743,000
NARROWS DAM--LAKE GREESON, AR...........       3,614,000       3,614,000
NIMROD LAKE, AR.........................       1,295,000       1,295,000
NORFORK LAKE, AR........................       3,505,000       3,505,000
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR......................         426,000         426,000
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA....       5,763,000       5,763,000
OZARK--JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM, AR.....       3,986,000       3,986,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR...........           5,000           5,000
WHITE RIVER, AR.........................       2,257,000       2,257,000
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR....................         113,000         113,000
                                                                        
               CALIFORNIA                                               
                                                                        
BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA....................       1,576,000       1,576,000
BUCHANAN DAM--H V EASTMAN LAKE, CA......       1,376,000       1,376,000
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA..............       2,000,000       2,000,000
COYOTE VALLEY DAM (LAKE MENDOCINO), CA..       2,432,000       2,432,000
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND                                       
 CHANNEL, CA............................       3,177,000       3,177,000
FARMINGTON DAM, CA......................         192,000         192,000
HIDDEN DAM--HENSLEY LAKE, CA............       1,446,000       1,446,000
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA.............       3,155,000       3,155,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA.......       1,224,000       1,224,000
ISABELLA LAKE, CA.......................       1,125,000       1,125,000
LOS ANGELES--LONG BEACH HARBOR MODEL, CA         165,000         165,000
LOS ANGELES--LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA.....         100,000         100,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA....       3,729,000       3,729,000
MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA..........         291,000         291,000
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA....................         222,000         222,000
MOSS LANDING HARBOR, CA.................       1,130,000       1,130,000
NAPA RIVER, CA..........................       2,056,000       2,056,000
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA......................       1,651,000       1,651,000
NEW MELONES LAKE (DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL),                                  
 CA.....................................         910,000         910,000
NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA..................          40,000          40,000
NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA...............         736,000         736,000
OAKLAND HARBOR, CA......................       2,625,000       2,625,000
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA....................         680,000         680,000
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA......................       2,721,000       2,721,000
PORT HUENEME, CA........................         399,000         399,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA...........       1,415,000       1,415,000
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA.....................       3,025,000       3,025,000
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA..       2,099,000       2,099,000
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS                                
 CONTROL), CA...........................         897,000         897,000
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL,                                 
 CA.....................................         105,000         105,000
SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA....................         175,000         175,000
SAN DIEGO RIVER--MISSION BAY, CA........          35,000          35,000
SAN FRANCISCO BAY--DELTA MODEL                                          
 STRUCTURE, CA..........................       2,030,000       2,030,000
SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT                                  
 STRATEGY, CA...........................         100,000         100,000
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY (DRIFT                                     
 REMOVAL), CA...........................       2,290,000       2,290,000
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA................       2,365,000       2,365,000
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA...................       1,960,000       1,960,000
SAN LEANDRO MARINA (JACK D MALTESTER                                    
 CHANNEL), CA...........................       1,450,000       1,450,000
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA       1,410,000       1,410,000
SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CA....................       2,515,000       2,515,000
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA...............       2,739,000       2,739,000
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA................       1,265,000       1,265,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA.....         739,000         739,000
SUCCESS LAKE, CA........................       1,610,000       1,610,000
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA..................         745,000         745,000
TERMINUS DAM (LAKE KAWEAH), CA..........       1,569,000       1,569,000
VENTURA HARBOR, CA......................       2,300,000       2,300,000
YUBA RIVER, CA..........................          48,000          48,000
                                                                        
                COLORADO                                                
                                                                        
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO.....................         423,000         423,000
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO......................         793,000         793,000
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO...................       1,084,000       1,084,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO.......          63,000          63,000
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO...............       1,415,000       1,415,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO.....         330,000         330,000
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO.......................         632,000         632,000
                                                                        
               CONNECTICUT                                              
                                                                        
BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT.....................         396,000         396,000
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT................         419,000         419,000
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT..................         469,000         469,000
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT......................         868,000         868,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT.......           3,000           3,000
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT...............         470,000         470,000
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT...............         415,000         415,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT...........       1,210,000       1,210,000
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT..........         402,000         402,000
THOMASTON DAM, CT.......................         477,000         477,000
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT..................         426,000         426,000
                                                                        
                DELAWARE                                                
                                                                        
CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL--ST                                       
 GEORGE'S BRIDGE REP....................      14,000,000      14,000,000
INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE..........         100,000         100,000
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO                                    
 CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE.....................      11,602,000      11,602,000
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO                                  
 DELAWARE BAY, DE.......................          42,000          42,000
MURDERKILL RIVER, DE....................         265,000         265,000
WATERWAY INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH                                 
 BAY, DE................................         315,000         315,000
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE...................       4,810,000       4,810,000
                                                                        
          DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA                                          
                                                                        
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC.......           7,000           7,000
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS (DRIFT                                     
 REMOVAL), DC...........................         829,000         829,000
POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC......          62,000          62,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC...........          30,000          30,000
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC...................          34,000          34,000
                                                                        
                 FLORIDA                                                
                                                                        
AIWW, NORFOLK TO ST JOHNS RIVER, FL, GA,                                
 SC, NC AND VA..........................       1,436,000       1,436,000
APALACHICOLA BAY, FL....................         150,000         150,000
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL....................       3,545,000       3,545,000
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........       9,513,000       9,513,000
CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL....................          35,000       4,830,000
EAST PASS CHANNEL, FL...................         886,000         886,000
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL.........         136,000         136,000
FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL...................       1,848,000       1,848,000
FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL..................         696,000         696,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL.......          50,000          50,000
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE R                                 
 TO ANCLOTE R,..........................         209,000         209,000
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO                                  
 MIAMI, FL..............................       3,538,000       3,538,000
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.................       2,965,000       7,000,000
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE                                         
 SEMINOLE, FL, AL AND GA................       5,040,000       5,040,000
JOHNS PASS, PINELLAS COUNTY, FL.........          40,000          40,000
LA GRANGE BAYOU, FL.....................          80,000          80,000
LONG BOAT PASS, FL......................          40,000          40,000
MIAMI HARBOR, FL........................         343,000         343,000
NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL..................          30,000          30,000
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL.................       4,276,000       4,276,000
OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL......................         155,000         155,000
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL...................       2,233,000       2,233,000
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL..................          35,000          35,000
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL....................         120,000         120,000
PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL.................         113,000         113,000
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL..............          55,000          55,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL...........         500,000         500,000
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL...........       3,980,000       3,980,000
ST AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL.................          10,000          10,000
ST LUCIE INLET, FL......................          68,000          68,000
ST PETERSBURG HARBOR, FL................          13,000          13,000
TAMPA HARBOR, FL........................       4,068,000       4,068,000
WITHLACOOCHIE RIVER, FL.................          41,000          41,000
                                                                        
                 GEORGIA                                                
                                                                        
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA......................       4,514,000       4,514,000
APALACHICOLA CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT                                    
 RIVERS, GA, AL &.......................       4,109,000       4,109,000
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA......       1,710,000       1,710,000
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA....................       2,883,000       2,883,000
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA...       6,649,000       6,649,000
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA................       4,324,000       4,324,000
HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC................       9,441,000       9,441,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA.......          40,000          40,000
J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA AND SC........      10,378,000      10,378,000
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND                                  
 SC.....................................       6,357,000       6,357,000
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA.....................      14,714,000      14,714,000
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA........         277,000       1,777,000
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA AND AL......       4,911,000       4,911,000
                                                                        
                 HAWAII                                                 
                                                                        
BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI................         150,000         150,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI.......         200,000         200,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI...........         275,000         275,000
                                                                        
                  IDAHO                                                 
                                                                        
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID....................       4,535,000       4,535,000
DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID..........       7,939,000       7,939,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID.......         114,000         114,000
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID.....................       1,151,000       1,151,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID.....         272,000         272,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, ID.............................          45,000          45,000
                                                                        
                ILLINOIS                                                
                                                                        
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN.....       1,258,000       1,258,000
CARLYLE LAKE, IL........................       4,497,000       4,497,000
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL......................       3,528,000       3,528,000
CHICAGO RIVER, IL.......................         507,000         507,000
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL...............         257,000         257,000
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (LMVD PORTION), IL....         881,000         881,000
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (NCD PORTION), IL AND                                 
 IN.....................................      23,726,000      23,726,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......         712,000         712,000
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL..........       1,556,000       1,556,000
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL.............         498,000         498,000
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL....................       5,763,000       5,763,000
MISS R BETWEEN MO R AND MINNEAPOLIS                                     
 (LMVD PORTION), IL.....................      13,081,000      13,081,000
MISS R BETWEEN MO R AND MINNEAPOLIS, IL,                                
 IA, MN, MO &...........................      79,423,000      79,423,000
NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL..........         150,000         150,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL...........         105,000         105,000
REND LAKE, IL...........................       3,568,000       3,568,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, IL.............................         191,000         191,000
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL.....................       1,167,000       1,167,000
                                                                        
                 INDIANA                                                
                                                                        
BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN.....................         815,000         815,000
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN...............       1,193,000       1,193,000
BURNS WATERWAY SMALL BOAT HARBOR, IN....           5,000           5,000
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN....................         661,000         661,000
CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN.................         739,000         739,000
HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN.....................         733,000         733,000
INDIANA HARBOR, IN......................         458,000         458,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN.......         117,000         117,000
MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN................          62,000          62,000
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN...................         993,000         993,000
MONROE LAKE, IN.........................         749,000         749,000
PATOKA LAKE, IN.........................         605,000         605,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN...........          26,000          26,000
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN......................         799,000         799,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, IN.............................         110,000         110,000
                                                                        
                  IOWA                                                  
                                                                        
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA.....................       2,726,000       2,726,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA.......         874,000         874,000
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO                                    
 SIOUX CITY, IA.........................          64,000          64,000
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO MOUTH, IA,                                
 NE, KS AND MO..........................       6,210,000       6,210,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IA...........          61,000          61,000
RATHBUN LAKE, IA........................       1,884,000       1,884,000
RED ROCK DAM--LAKE RED ROCK, IA.........       3,518,000       3,518,000
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA....................       3,635,000       3,635,000
                                                                        
                 KANSAS                                                 
                                                                        
CLINTON LAKE, KS........................       1,473,000       1,473,000
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS..................       1,032,000       1,032,000
EL DORADO LAKE, KS......................         489,000         489,000
ELK CITY LAKE, KS.......................         723,000         723,000
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS.....................         737,000         737,000
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS......................         807,000         807,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS.......          78,000          78,000
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS......       4,054,000       4,054,000
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS......................       1,395,000       1,395,000
MARION LAKE, KS.........................       1,038,000       1,038,000
MELVERN LAKE, KS........................       1,580,000       1,580,000
MILFORD LAKE, KS........................       1,759,000       1,759,000
PEARSON--SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS......         798,000         798,000
PERRY LAKE, KS..........................       1,798,000       1,798,000
POMONA LAKE, KS.........................       1,720,000       1,720,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS.....          56,000          56,000
TORONTO LAKE, KS........................         357,000         357,000
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS...................       2,031,000       2,031,000
WILSON LAKE, KS.........................       1,715,000       1,715,000
                                                                        
                KENTUCKY                                                
                                                                        
BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY AND TN.       8,429,000       8,429,000
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY...................       1,968,000       1,968,000
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY....................       1,080,000       1,080,000
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY.......................       1,232,000       1,232,000
CARR FORK LAKE, KY......................       1,397,000       1,397,000
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY.......................         964,000         964,000
DEWEY LAKE, KY..........................       1,330,000       1,330,000
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY........         420,000         420,000
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY.......................       1,944,000       1,944,000
GRAYSON LAKE, KY........................       1,249,000       1,249,000
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.............       1,835,000       1,835,000
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY....................       1,791,000       1,791,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......         153,000         153,000
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY......................       1,148,000       1,148,000
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY...................       1,235,000       1,235,000
LICKING RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY.....          23,000          23,000
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY...................         692,000         692,000
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY..          83,000          83,000
NOLIN LAKE, KY..........................       1,725,000       1,725,000
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN,                                  
 OH, PA AND WV..........................      52,146,000      52,146,000
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL,                                   
 IN, OH, PA AND WV......................       6,533,000       6,533,000
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY....................       1,041,000       1,041,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY...........           5,000           5,000
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY....................       1,790,000       1,790,000
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY...................       1,015,000       1,015,000
WOLF CREEK DAM--LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY.....       5,996,000       5,996,000
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY.....................       1,067,000       1,067,000
                                                                        
                LOUISIANA                                               
                                                                        
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE,                                     
 BOEUF AND BLACK, LA....................       8,281,000       8,281,000
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA..............         497,000         497,000
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA..............         520,000         520,000
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP                                      
 WATERWAY, LA...........................          10,000          10,000
BAYOU PIERRE, LA........................          25,000          25,000
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA.....          25,000          25,000
BAYOU TECHE, LA.........................         119,000         119,000
CADDO LAKE, LA..........................         138,000         138,000
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA............       4,535,000       4,535,000
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA....................       1,947,000       1,947,000
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA AND TX...      16,603,000      16,603,000
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA..............       2,321,000       2,321,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......         418,000         418,000
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA..............         321,000         321,000
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA.................          38,000          38,000
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA.....................       1,000,000       1,000,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER--BATON ROUGE TO GULF                                  
 OF MEXICO, LA..........................      46,155,000      46,155,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER--GULF OUTLET, LA......      12,828,000      12,828,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA.       2,190,000       2,190,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA...........         144,000         144,000
RED RIVER WATERWAY, MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO                                
 SHREVEPORT, L..........................       9,853,000      10,853,000
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA...........       1,890,000       1,890,000
TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA....................         150,000         150,000
WALLACE LAKE, LA........................         165,000         165,000
WATERWAY--EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA........         115,000         115,000
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO B                                
 DULAC, LA..............................         225,000         225,000
                                                                        
                  MAINE                                                 
                                                                        
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME...........       1,131,000       1,131,000
SCARBOROUGH RIVER, ME...................       1,167,000       1,167,000
YORK HARBOR, ME.........................         714,000         714,000
                                                                        
                MARYLAND                                                
                                                                        
BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD (50                                   
 FT)....................................      10,711,000      10,711,000
BALTIMORE HARBOR (DRIFT REMOVAL), MD....         420,000         420,000
BALTIMORE HARBOR (PREVENTION OF                                         
 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS),.................         550,000         550,000
CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD....................         478,000         478,000
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV.........         108,000         108,000
FISHING BAY, MD.........................         695,000         695,000
HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD.............          65,000          65,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD.......          32,000          32,000
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV.......       1,600,000       1,600,000
NORTHEAST RIVER, MD.....................         117,000         117,000
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND                                         
 SINEPUXENT BAY, MD.....................         582,000         582,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD...........         300,000         300,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD.....         119,000         119,000
TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD..............          50,000          50,000
TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE RIVER, MD.         744,000         744,000
WICOMICO RIVER, MD......................          70,000          70,000
                                                                        
              MASSACHUSETTS                                             
                                                                        
ANDREWS RIVER, MA.......................         165,000         165,000
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA.....................         324,000         324,000
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA......................         451,000         451,000
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA....................         348,000         348,000
CAPE COD CANAL, MA......................       8,191,000       8,191,000
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE                                    
 AREA, MA...............................         378,000         378,000
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA...................         168,000         168,000
CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA....................         101,000         101,000
DUXBURY HARBOR, MA......................       1,882,000       1,882,000
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA.................         294,000         294,000
GREEN HARBOR, MA........................         262,000         262,000
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA..................         339,000         339,000
HYANNIS HARBOR, MA......................         358,000         358,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA.......         112,000         112,000
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA.....................         371,000         371,000
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA....................         338,000         338,000
NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET                                      
 HURRICANE BARRIER,.....................         595,000         595,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA...........         971,000         971,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, MA.............................          16,000          16,000
TULLY LAKE, MA..........................         376,000         376,000
WEST HILL DAM, MA.......................         521,000         521,000
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA......................         387,000         387,000
                                                                        
                MICHIGAN                                                
                                                                        
ALPENA HARBOR, MI.......................         254,000         254,000
ARCADIA HARBOR, MI......................         293,000         293,000
AU SABLE HARBOR, MI.....................          22,000          22,000
BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI............          23,000          23,000
CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI....................         124,000         124,000
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI...........         125,000         125,000
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI...................          80,000          80,000
CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI....................         105,000         105,000
CLINTON RIVER, MI.......................         113,000         113,000
DETROIT RIVER, MI.......................       3,466,000       3,466,000
FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI....................          38,000          38,000
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI..................       1,278,000       1,278,000
HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI.................         112,000         112,000
HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI..................         368,000         368,000
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI......................         614,000         614,000
INLAND ROUTE, MI........................          23,000          23,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI.......         205,000         205,000
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI...................         302,000         302,000
LAC LA BELLE, MI........................          82,000          82,000
LELAND HARBOR, MI.......................         306,000         306,000
LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI....................         225,000         225,000
LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI..................          94,000          94,000
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI....................         166,000         166,000
MACKINAW CITY HARBOR MI.................          22,000          22,000
MANISTEE HARBOR, MI.....................          60,000          60,000
MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI...................         323,000         323,000
MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI AND WI.............         484,000         484,000
MONROE HARBOR, MI.......................         717,000         717,000
MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI.....................         126,000         126,000
NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI..................          25,000          25,000
ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI....................         496,000         496,000
PENTWATER HARBOR, MI....................       1,719,000       1,719,000
PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI.....................         163,000         163,000
POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI................         298,000         298,000
PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI..................         163,000         163,000
PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI.................         218,000         218,000
PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI.................         255,000         255,000
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI.................          82,000          82,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI...........         169,000         169,000
ROUGE RIVER, MI.........................         502,000         502,000
SAGINAW RIVER, MI.......................       1,729,000       1,729,000
SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI....................       1,926,000       1,926,000
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI.....................         538,000         538,000
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI..................          35,000          35,000
ST CLAIR RIVER, MI......................         767,000         767,000
ST JOSEPH HARBOR, MI....................         671,000         671,000
ST MARYS RIVER, MI......................      16,557,000      16,557,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, MI.............................       2,301,000       2,301,000
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI...................       1,688,000       1,688,000
WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI..............          22,000          22,000
                                                                        
                MINNESOTA                                               
                                                                        
BIGSTONE LAKE WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD         179,000         179,000
DULUTH--SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI......       2,665,000       2,665,000
GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN.................          22,000          22,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN.......           9,000           9,000
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN         835,000         835,000
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN.....................         145,000         145,000
ORWELL LAKE, MN.........................       2,909,000       2,909,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN...........          59,000          59,000
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN..................          87,000          87,000
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI                                 
 RIVER, MN..............................       2,397,000       2,397,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, MN.............................         231,000         231,000
TWO HARBORS, MN.........................         157,000         157,000
                                                                        
               MISSISSIPPI                                              
                                                                        
BILOXI HARBOR, MS.......................         800,000         800,000
CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS...............           3,000           3,000
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS..........         200,000         200,000
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS.....................       2,999,000       2,999,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......         114,000         114,000
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS................          78,000          78,000
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS......................       1,693,000       1,693,000
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS...................       3,001,000       3,001,000
PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA..................       1,983,000       1,983,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS...........           5,000           5,000
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS.....................         348,000         348,000
YAZOO RIVER, MS.........................          15,000          15,000
                                                                        
                MISSOURI                                                
                                                                        
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO...............         315,000         315,000
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE,                                
 MO.....................................       5,197,000       5,197,000
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO.....................       2,025,000       2,025,000
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO....       8,418,000       8,418,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......         203,000         203,000
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO.............         878,000         878,000
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO....................         747,000         747,000
MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS                                  
 (REG WORKS), MO........................      14,299,000      14,299,000
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO...................         265,000         265,000
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO.................       1,845,000       1,845,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO...........           5,000           5,000
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO.....................       1,046,000       1,046,000
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSISSIPPI                                    
 RIVER, MO..............................         101,000         101,000
STOCKTON LAKE, MO.......................       3,391,000       3,391,000
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO.....................       5,501,000       5,501,000
UNION LAKE, MO..........................          16,000          16,000
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO.....................          20,000          20,000
                                                                        
                 MONTANA                                                
                                                                        
FT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT................       3,684,000       3,684,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT.......          16,000          16,000
LIBBY DAM, LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT...........       8,127,000       8,127,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT.....          47,000          47,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, MT.............................          14,000          14,000
                                                                        
                NEBRASKA                                                
                                                                        
GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE,                                 
 NE AND SD..............................       6,193,000       6,193,000
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE..................       1,382,000       1,382,000
MISSOURI R MASTER WTR CONTROL MANUAL,                                   
 NE, IA, KS, MO,........................       1,000,000       1,000,000
MISSOURI NATIONAL RECEATIONAL RIVER, NE,                                
 SD.....................................  ..............         200,000
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN COLLABORATIVE WATER                                
 PLANNING, NE...........................         500,000         500,000
PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES,                                  
 NE.....................................         736,000         736,000
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE..........         928,000         928,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NE.....         442,000         442,000
                                                                        
                 NEVADA                                                 
                                                                        
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV AND CA............         483,000         483,000
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV......         164,000         164,000
                                                                        
              NEW HAMPSHIRE                                             
                                                                        
BLACKWATER DAM, NH......................         415,000         415,000
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH...............         468,000         468,000
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH..................         731,000         731,000
HOPKINTON--EVERETT LAKES, NH............       1,887,000       1,887,000
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH....................         489,000         489,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH...........         355,000         355,000
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH.................         532,000         532,000
                                                                        
               NEW JERSEY                                               
                                                                        
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ......................       1,275,000       1,275,000
CHEESEQUAKE CREEK, NJ...................         430,000         430,000
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ...................         500,000         500,000
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ............          20,000          20,000
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA,                                
 NJ, PA AND DE..........................      15,195,000      15,195,000
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO                                     
 TRENTON, NJ............................       1,445,000       1,445,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ.......         293,000         293,000
KEYPORT HARBOR, NJ......................          50,000          50,000
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ.....................       2,300,000       2,300,000
MATAWAN CREEK, NJ.......................          50,000          50,000
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ....       2,079,000       2,079,000
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC                                      
 RIVERS, NJ.............................       1,190,000       1,190,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ...........         354,000         354,000
SHARK RIVER, NJ.........................         420,000         420,000
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ......         375,000         375,000
                                                                        
               NEW MEXICO                                               
                                                                        
ABIQUIU DAM, NM.........................       1,340,000       1,340,000
COCHITI LAKE, NM........................       1,987,000       1,987,000
CONCHAS LAKE, NM........................       1,105,000       1,105,000
GALISTEO DAM, NM........................         356,000         356,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM.......         109,000         109,000
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM....................         425,000         425,000
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM.............         966,000         966,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM.....          66,000          66,000
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM......................         455,000         455,000
UPPER RIO GRANDE, WATER OPERATIONS MODEL  ..............         210,000
                                                                        
                NEW YORK                                                
                                                                        
ALMOND LAKE, NY.........................         525,000         525,000
ARKPORT DAM, NY.........................         259,000         259,000
BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, NY.....         465,000         465,000
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR,                                
 NY.....................................       3,906,000       3,906,000
BRONX RIVER, NY.........................         365,000         365,000
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY......................       1,476,000       1,476,000
DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY......................         263,000         263,000
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY.................          90,000          90,000
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY....................         466,000         466,000
EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................         625,000         625,000
FIRE ISLAND INLET, NY...................         120,000         120,000
FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY..........         900,000         900,000
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY..............         380,000         380,000
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY................         925,000         925,000
HUDSON RIVER, NY........................       2,215,000       2,215,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY.......         540,000         540,000
JAMAICA BAY, NY.........................       1,300,000       1,300,000
JONES INLET, NY.........................       1,005,000       1,005,000
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.................          85,000          85,000
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY....................         100,000         100,000
MORICHES INLET, NY......................          80,000          80,000
MT MORRIS LAKE, NY......................       2,361,000       2,361,000
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY....       1,750,000       1,750,000
NEW YORK HARBOR (DRIFT REMOVAL), NY AND                                 
 NJ.....................................       4,273,000       4,273,000
NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF                                          
 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS),.................         730,000         730,000
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY.....................       5,798,000       9,298,000
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY.......................         285,000         285,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY...........         109,000         109,000
ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY....................         918,000         918,000
RONDOUT HARBOR, NY......................         740,000         740,000
SHINNECOCK INLET, NY....................         500,000         500,000
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL                                         
 PROJECTS, NY...........................         900,000         900,000
STURGEON POINT HARBOR, NY...............          15,000          15,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, NY.............................         527,000         527,000
WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................         500,000         500,000
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY..................         510,000         510,000
                                                                        
             NORTH CAROLINA                                             
                                                                        
ATLANTIC BEACH CHANNELS, NC.............          20,000          20,000
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC......       5,328,000       5,328,000
AVON HARBOR, NC.........................          20,000          20,000
B EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.......       1,128,000       1,128,000
BEAUFORT HARBOR, NC.....................          20,000          20,000
BELHAVEN HARBOR, NC.....................          90,000          90,000
BOGUE INLET AND CHANNEL, NC.............         655,000         655,000
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC....         686,000         686,000
CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC................         852,000         852,000
CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT                                      
 BIGHT, NC..............................          20,000          20,000
DRUM INLET, NC..........................       2,000,000       2,000,000
FALLS LAKE, NC..........................       1,043,000       1,043,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC.......          22,000          22,000
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC...............         857,000         857,000
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC.............       6,171,000       7,552,000
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS,                                
 NC.....................................         890,000         890,000
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC................       2,748,000       2,748,000
NEW RIVER INLET, NC.....................       1,595,000       1,595,000
NEW TOPSAIL INLET AND CONNECTING                                        
 CHANNELS, NC...........................         840,000         840,000
PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, NC..............         125,000         125,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC...........          59,000          59,000
ROANOKE RIVER, NC.......................         125,000         125,000
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC...................          20,000          20,000
STUMPY POINT BAY, NC....................          20,000          20,000
W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC......       1,904,000       1,904,000
WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND                                   
 BEAUFORT HARBOR,.......................          20,000          20,000
WATERWAY CONNECTING SWANQUARTER BAY AND                                 
 DEEP BAY, NC...........................          20,000          20,000
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...................       5,757,000       5,757,000
                                                                        
              NORTH DAKOTA                                              
                                                                        
BOWMAN--HALEY LAKE, ND..................         229,000         229,000
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND........       8,445,000       8,445,000
HOMME LAKE, ND..........................         150,000         150,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND.......         104,000         104,000
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND.....         933,000         933,000
MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM, MT                                 
 AND GAVINS PT. DAM, SD AND NE, BTID                                    
 (SEC. 33)..............................  ..............         750,000
LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND (MOSQUITO CONTROL)...  ..............          50,000
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.......................         418,000         418,000
SOURIS RIVER, ND........................         261,000         261,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, ND.............................          33,000          33,000
                                                                        
                  OHIO                                                  
                                                                        
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH.....................         693,000         693,000
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH....................         718,000         718,000
BERLIN LAKE, OH.........................       1,429,000       1,429,000
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH...................       1,142,000       1,142,000
CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH................         808,000         808,000
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH....................      17,938,000      17,938,000
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH.....................         628,000         628,000
DELAWARE LAKE, OH.......................         671,000         671,000
DILLON LAKE, OH.........................         503,000         503,000
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH.....................         866,000         866,000
HURON HARBOR, OH........................       1,030,000       1,030,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH.......         335,000         335,000
LORAIN HARBOR, OH.......................         445,000         445,000
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH..          25,000          25,000
MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH..         887,000         887,000
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH.................         899,000         899,000
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH...............       5,793,000       5,793,000
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH....         312,000         312,000
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH....................       1,664,000       1,664,000
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR, OH...................          15,000          15,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH...........          26,000          26,000
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH..          30,000          30,000
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH.....................       1,013,000       1,013,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, OH.............................         283,000         283,000
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH.......................       3,340,000       3,340,000
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH.....................         367,000         367,000
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH........         558,000         558,000
WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE, OH...............         802,000         802,000
                                                                        
                OKLAHOMA                                                
                                                                        
ARCADIA LAKE, OK........................         295,000         295,000
BIRCH LAKE, OK..........................         812,000         812,000
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK.....................       1,691,000       1,691,000
CANDY LAKE, OK..........................          39,000          39,000
CANTON LAKE, OK.........................       1,848,000       1,848,000
COPAN LAKE, OK..........................         916,000         916,000
EUFAULA LAKE, OK........................       3,522,000       3,522,000
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK....................       3,269,000       3,269,000
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK....................         802,000         802,000
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK..............         330,000         330,000
HEYBURN LAKE, OK........................         764,000         764,000
HUGO LAKE, OK...........................       1,619,000       1,619,000
HULAH LAKE, OK..........................         424,000         424,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK.......          84,000          84,000
KAW LAKE, OK............................       1,781,000       1,781,000
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK.......................       3,545,000       3,545,000
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK........................       1,326,000       1,326,000
OPTIMA LAKE, OK.........................         247,000         247,000
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR--LAKE OF THE                                        
 CHEROKEES, OK..........................          10,000          10,000
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK.....................       1,182,000       1,182,000
ROBERT S KERR LOCK AND DAM AND                                          
 RESERVOIRS, OK.........................       3,546,000       3,546,000
SARDIS LAKE, OK.........................         932,000         932,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK.....         474,000         474,000
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK.......................         922,000         922,000
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK................       3,554,000       3,554,000
WAURIKA LAKE, OK........................       1,521,000       1,521,000
WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK..........       2,902,000       2,902,000
WISTER LAKE, OK.........................         856,000         856,000
                                                                        
                 OREGON                                                 
                                                                        
APPLEGATE LAKE, OR......................         699,000         699,000
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR.....................         273,000         273,000
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR.............      17,109,000      17,109,000
CHETCO RIVER, OR........................         530,000         530,000
COLUMBIA AND LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW                                       
 VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLA...............      11,739,000      14,139,000
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA..       8,021,000       8,021,000
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA AND                                
 THE DALLES, OR.........................         344,000         344,000
COOS BAY, OR............................       4,433,000       4,433,000
COQUILLE RIVER, OR......................         559,000         559,000
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR..................         756,000         756,000
COUGAR LAKE, OR.........................       1,466,000       1,466,000
DEPOE BAY, OR...........................           3,000           3,000
DETROIT LAKE, OR........................       2,217,000       2,217,000
DORENA LAKE, OR.........................         597,000         597,000
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR.....................         551,000         551,000
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR.....................         964,000         964,000
GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR...........       2,549,000       2,549,000
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR....................         764,000         764,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR.......         184,000         184,000
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR AND WA........      14,558,000      14,558,000
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR..................       4,138,000       4,138,000
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR.....................       4,021,000       4,021,000
MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR AND WA..........      11,242,000      11,242,000
PORT ORFORD, OR.........................         396,000         396,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR...........         154,000         154,000
ROGUE RIVER, OR.........................       1,153,000       1,153,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR.....         102,000         102,000
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR.......................         753,000         753,000
SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR....................          17,000          17,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, OR.............................          56,000          56,000
TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR...............          13,000          13,000
UMPQUA RIVER, OR........................       1,228,000       1,228,000
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR       1,201,000       1,201,000
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR....          60,000          60,000
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR...................         603,000         603,000
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR..............       2,192,000       2,192,000
                                                                        
              PENNSYLVANIA                                              
                                                                        
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.....................       7,586,000       7,586,000
ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA....................         635,000         635,000
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA...............         219,000         219,000
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA.....................         830,000         830,000
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA.....................       2,194,000       2,194,000
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA................       2,252,000       2,252,000
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA.....................       2,076,000       2,076,000
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA..................       1,301,000       1,301,000
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA...................         754,000         754,000
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA......       1,071,000       1,071,000
ERIE HARBOR, PA.........................          25,000          25,000
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA............         744,000         744,000
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA................         818,000         818,000
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR,                                 
 PA.....................................         587,000         587,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA.......         181,000         181,000
JOHNSTOWN, PA...........................         222,000         222,000
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA..       1,399,000       1,399,000
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA.....................       1,138,000       1,138,000
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA.................       1,317,000       1,317,000
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA...................      16,940,000      16,940,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA...........       1,228,000       1,228,000
PROMPTON LAKE, PA.......................         586,000         586,000
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA........................          12,000          12,000
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA.......................       3,690,000       3,690,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA.....          60,000          60,000
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA....................         350,000         350,000
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA.................       2,418,000       2,418,000
STILLWATER LAKE, PA.....................         345,000         345,000
TIOGA--HAMMOND LAKES, PA................       2,577,000       2,577,000
TIONESTA LAKE, PA.......................       1,231,000       1,231,000
UNION CITY LAKE, PA.....................         297,000         297,000
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA.................         919,000         919,000
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA................       1,297,000       1,297,000
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA AND MD......       2,154,000       2,154,000
                                                                        
              RHODE ISLAND                                              
                                                                        
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI...........         444,000         444,000
                                                                        
             SOUTH CAROLINA                                             
                                                                        
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC......       2,589,000       3,189,000
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC...................       4,609,000       4,859,000
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC.....       3,287,000       4,112,000
FOLLY RIVER, SC.........................         392,000         604,000
GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC...................       3,088,000       3,088,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC.......          27,000          27,000
LITTLE RIVER INLET, SC AND NC...........          40,000          40,000
MURRELLS INLET, SC......................          42,000          42,000
PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC...................          81,000         151,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC...........          23,000          23,000
SHIPYARD RIVER, SC......................         395,000         545,000
TOWN CREEK, SC..........................         488,000         588,000
                                                                        
              SOUTH DAKOTA                                              
                                                                        
BIG BEND DAM--LAKE SHARPE, SD...........       6,457,000       6,457,000
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD.....................         201,000         201,000
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD.............         186,000         186,000
FT RANDALL DAM--LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD...       8,041,000       8,041,000
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD AND MN................         430,000         430,000
OAHE DAM--LAKE OAHE, SD AND ND..........       9,911,000       9,911,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD.....         311,000         311,000
                                                                        
                TENNESSEE                                               
                                                                        
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN....................       4,938,000       4,938,000
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN...............       5,559,000       5,559,000
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN......       4,694,000       4,694,000
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN....................       3,908,000       3,908,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......         130,000         130,000
J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN....       4,039,000       4,039,000
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN............       6,833,000       6,833,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN...........           7,000           7,000
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN.....................      13,612,000      13,612,000
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN...................         650,000         650,000
                                                                        
                  TEXAS                                                 
                                                                        
AQUILLA LAKE, TX........................         627,000         627,000
ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE                                     
 CONTROL--AREA VI.......................       1,162,000       1,162,000
BARDWELL LAKE, TX.......................       1,344,000       1,344,000
BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX................       1,160,000       1,160,000
BELTON LAKE, TX.........................       2,325,000       2,325,000
BENBROOK LAKE, TX.......................       1,572,000       1,572,000
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX................       3,328,000       3,328,000
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.......       3,413,000       3,413,000
CANYON LAKE, TX.........................       2,001,000       2,001,000
CEDAR BAYOU, TX.........................         600,000         600,000
CHANNEL TO PORT MANSFIELD, TX...........         160,000         160,000
COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX............         951,000         951,000
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.........       4,360,000       4,360,000
DENISON DAM--LAKE TEXOMA, TX............       5,275,000       5,275,000
DOUBLE BAYOU, TX........................         510,000         510,000
ESTELLINE SPRINGS, TX...................          12,000          12,000
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM--LAKE O'THE PINES,                                  
 TX.....................................       2,182,000       2,182,000
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX.....................       3,140,000       3,140,000
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX........       3,693,000       3,693,000
GIWW--CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX...........         620,000         620,000
GIWW--CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX...............         300,000         300,000
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX................       1,416,000       1,416,000
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX......................       1,968,000       1,968,000
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX..........      19,138,000      19,138,000
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX....................       1,004,000       1,004,000
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX................       4,323,000       4,323,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX.......         590,000         590,000
JOE POOL LAKE, TX.......................         774,000         774,000
LAKE KEMP, TX...........................         235,000         235,000
LAVON LAKE, TX..........................       2,180,000       2,180,000
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX......................       2,589,000       2,589,000
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX..............       1,490,000       1,490,000
MOUTH OF THE COLORADO RIVER, TX.........       1,165,000       1,165,000
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX..................       1,380,000       1,380,000
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE                                          
 GEORGETOWN, TX.........................       1,539,000       1,539,000
O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX.............         792,000         792,000
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX......................         796,000         796,000
PROCTOR LAKE, TX........................       1,543,000       1,543,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX...........          60,000          60,000
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX....................         711,000         711,000
SABINE--NECHES WATERWAY, TX.............      10,050,000      10,050,000
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX.......       3,462,000       3,462,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX.....          77,000          77,000
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX.....................       2,385,000       2,385,000
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX...............       1,567,000       1,567,000
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............       1,250,000       1,250,000
TOWN BLUFF DAM--B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX.       1,571,000       1,571,000
TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.......          35,000          35,000
WACO LAKE, TX...........................       1,901,000       1,901,000
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX....................         449,000         449,000
WHITNEY LAKE, TX........................       3,326,000       3,326,000
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX..........       2,295,000       2,295,000
                                                                        
                  UTAH                                                  
                                                                        
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT.......          41,000          41,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT.....         159,000         159,000
                                                                        
                 VERMONT                                                
                                                                        
BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT..................         854,000         854,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT.......         133,000         133,000
NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT AND NY....          46,000          46,000
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT.................         555,000         555,000
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT..............         668,000         668,000
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT......................         592,000         592,000
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT...................         392,000         392,000
                                                                        
                VIRGINIA                                                
                                                                        
APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA....................           5,000           5,000
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, VA......       2,290,000       2,290,000
BROAD CREEK, VA.........................           1,000           1,000
CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA.............          50,000          50,000
CHINCOTEAGUE BAY CHANNEL, VA............         125,000         125,000
CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA.......         144,000         144,000
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA..................         887,000         887,000
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA.......       1,481,000       1,481,000
HAMPTON CREEK, VA.......................         210,000         210,000
HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS                                   
 HBR, VA (DRIFT REM.....................         700,000         700,000
HORN HARBOR, VA.........................         125,000         125,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA.......          84,000          84,000
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA.................       2,567,000       2,567,000
JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA AND NC.............       6,652,000       6,652,000
JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA..       1,498,000       1,498,000
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA.....................         712,000         712,000
NEABSCO CREEK, VA.......................         137,000         137,000
NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF                                           
 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS), VA..............         232,000         232,000
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA......................       5,000,000       5,000,000
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA......         337,000         337,000
PARKER CREEK, VA........................         113,000         113,000
PARROTTS CREEK, VA......................         234,000         234,000
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA.......................       2,203,000       2,203,000
POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA.........          41,000          41,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA...........         711,000         711,000
RUDEE INLET, VA.........................         608,000         608,000
THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA...............         152,000         152,000
TYLERS BEACH, VA........................         170,000         170,000
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA...       1,246,000       1,246,000
                                                                        
               WASHINGTON                                               
                                                                        
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA....................      12,830,000      12,830,000
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA AND OR..          44,000          44,000
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND                                 
 ISLAND, WA.............................          38,000          38,000
EDIZ HOOK, WA...........................         746,000         746,000
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA..         853,000         853,000
FRIDAY HARBOR, WA.......................          52,000          52,000
GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA.....       7,479,000       8,009,000
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA...................       1,198,000       1,198,000
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA.............       7,689,000       7,689,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA.......         116,000         116,000
LAKE CROCKETT (KEYSTONE HARBOR), WA.....          34,000          34,000
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA..........       6,833,000       6,833,000
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA...........       5,187,000       5,187,000
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA..........       7,541,000       7,541,000
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.......       5,876,000       5,876,000
MILL CREEK LAKE, VIRGIL B BENNINGTON                                    
 LAKE, WA...............................         737,000         737,000
MT ST HELENS, WA........................         414,000         414,000
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA....................       1,860,000       1,860,000
OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA......................           9,000           9,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA...........         282,000         282,000
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA....       1,100,000       1,100,000
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA....................         769,000         769,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA.....         421,000         421,000
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA......................         265,000         265,000
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA.................  ..............         185,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, WA.............................          87,000          87,000
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA...................         365,000         365,000
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA..............          66,000          66,000
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA AND OR......      10,820,000      10,820,000
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA............       1,002,000       1,002,000
                                                                        
              WEST VIRGINIA                                             
                                                                        
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV.....................       1,069,000       1,069,000
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV......................       1,647,000       1,647,000
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV.....................       1,427,000       1,427,000
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV......................       1,520,000       1,520,000
ELK RIVER HARBOR, WV....................           3,000           3,000
ELKINS, WV..............................          11,000          11,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV.......          73,000          73,000
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV........       8,759,000       8,759,000
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV.....................       1,504,000       1,504,000
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV..............         940,000         940,000
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV...................       1,512,000       1,512,000
SUTTON LAKE, WV.........................       1,481,000       1,481,000
TYGART LAKE, WV.........................         780,000         780,000
                                                                        
                WISCONSIN                                               
                                                                        
ASHLAND HARBOR, WI......................         276,000         276,000
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI................         585,000         585,000
FOX RIVER, WI...........................       2,602,000       2,902,000
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI....................       1,018,000       1,018,000
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (DIKE DISPOSAL)....       3,793,000       3,793,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI.......          46,000          46,000
KENOSHA HARBOR, WI......................         465,000         465,000
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI.....................         329,000         329,000
LA FARGE LAKE, WI.......................         120,000         120,000
LA POINTE HARBOR, WI....................          22,000          22,000
MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI....................         187,000         187,000
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI....................       2,673,000       2,673,000
OCONTO HARBOR, WI.......................          58,000          58,000
PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI..............          40,000          40,000
PORT WING HARBOR, WI....................         109,000         109,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI...........          78,000          78,000
SAXON HARBOR, WI........................         188,000         188,000
SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI....................         560,000         560,000
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN                                   
 SHIP CANAL, WI.........................         299,000         299,000
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                                       
 WATERS, WI.............................         424,000         424,000
TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI...................          29,000          29,000
                                                                        
                 WYOMING                                                
                                                                        
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY.................       1,041,000       1,041,000
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY.....          36,000          36,000
                                                                        
              MISCELLANEOUS                                             
                                                                        
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM..........       2,000,000       2,000,000
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION)....       2,000,000       2,000,000
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE                                      
 MONITORING SYSTEM......................         480,000         480,000
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL                                   
 RESEARCH (DOER)........................       1,000,000       3,000,000
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS PROGRAM FOR BUILDINGS                                
 AND LIFELINES..........................         700,000         700,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN MAINSTEM MODEL                                  
 DEVELOPMENT............................         500,000         500,000
MONITORING OF COMPLETED COASTAL PROJECTS       1,900,000       1,900,000
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.............          20,000          20,000
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMS                                
 (NEPP).................................       5,500,000       5,500,000
OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT............       2,650,000       2,650,000
PEER REVIEW PROGRAM.....................         200,000         200,000
PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS                                  
 (SECTION 3)............................          50,000          50,000
RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR                                    
 REHABILITATION.........................         500,000         500,000
REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS...............         500,000         500,000
REPAIR EVALUATION MAINTENANCE RESEARCH                                  
 (REMR II)..............................       2,000,000       2,000,000
RIVER CONFLUENCE ICE RESEARCH...........         500,000         500,000
UNFORSEEN CRITICAL MAINTENANCE DREDGING.  ..............      12,500,000
WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS..........       4,000,000       4,000,000
REDUCTION FOR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS AND                                   
 SLIPPAGE...............................     -32,216,000     -32,216,000
                                         -------------------------------
      TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE..   1,663,000,000   1,700,358,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF PROJECT:                                                        
    (N)  NAVIGATION                                                     
    (BE)  BEACH EROSION CONTROL                                         
    (FC)  FLOOD CONTROL                                                 
    (MP)  MULTIPURPOSE, INCLUDING POWER                                 

    The Committee continues to believe that it is essential to 
provide adequate resources and attention to operation and 
maintenance requirements in order to protect the large Federal 
investment. Yet current and projected budgetary constraints 
require the Committee to limit the amount of work that can be 
accomplished in the fiscal year. In order to cope with the 
current situation, the Corps has had to defer or delay 
scheduled maintenance activities.
    Much of the backlog is essential maintenance dredging 
needed to keep the Nation's ports, harbors, and waterways open 
and able to efficiently handle international trade activities. 
Yet the Committee is aware that out-year budget planning 
guidance for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects that the 
current appropriation for their critical operation and 
maintenance activities will decline from $1,703,000,000 in 1996 
to around $1,400,000,000 in the year 2000. If additional 
resources are not available, the Committee will be forced to 
begin terminating or closing many activities and projects.
    The Committee is aware of the Corps' efforts to stretch the 
limited resources to cover all of its projects and to effect 
savings through a variety of means. As more and more projects 
enter the inventory and budgetary constraints continue, it is 
clear that the Corps will need to find innovated ways to 
accomplish required O&M work nationwide. Adjustment in lower 
priority programs and noncritical work should be made in 
conjunction with efforts to optimize the use of the limited 
resources in order to maximize the public benefit.
    Charlotte Harbor, FL.--The Committee understands that 
shoaling has severely restricted operations at Charlotte 
Harbor, FL. An additional $4,795,000 has been added for the 
Corps to advertise and award a dredging contract to address 
this unforeseen maintenance problem.
    Jacksonville Harbor, FL.--An additional $4,035,000 has been 
added over the budget request for the Corps to award a second 
training wall contract and undertake additional maintenance 
dredging.
    Savannah River below Augusta, GA (New Savannah Bluff Lock 
and Dam).--The Committee is aware of a decision by the Corps of 
Engineers to close the New Savannah Bluff lock and dam because 
of structural problems and that this action has severely 
impacted water travel from Augusta, GA, to the Atlantic Ocean. 
The Committee has provided an additional $1,500,000 for the 
Corps to dewater and accomplish the necessary repairs to the 
lock and dam.
    Red River Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA.--
The Committee is aware that very high rates of sedimentation 
have occurred in oxbow lakes formed by realignment of the 
navigation channel primarily as a result of flooding. The 
Committee notes that project documents projected that the 
environmental values of the oxbow lakes would be maintained 
over the life of the navigation project in order to attain the 
project's annual benefits. Therefore, the Committee has 
included an additional $1,000,000 over the budget request for 
the Corps to conduct maintenance dredging and other related 
work for recreation and environmental purposes.
    Upper Rio Grande water operation model, New Mexico.--The 
Committee has provide $210,000 for scheduling reservoir 
operations for the Corps to continue joint activities with 
other Federal agencies related to the need for an Upper Rio 
Grande water operations model to help water managers in flood 
control operations, water accounting, and evaluation of water 
operations alternatives.
    New York Harbor, NY-NJ.--An additional $3,500,000 over the 
budget request of $5,798,000 has been included for the Corps to 
perform the remaining dredge material management plan study 
activities, and to implement short-term disposal alternatives 
which have been determined to be feasibility and quickly 
implementable, and to investigate methods to reduce sediment 
contamination within the harbor.
    Lake Sakakawea, ND.--The Corps is directed to use $50,000 
of available resources to continue mosquito control measures at 
Lake Sakakawea, ND, in fiscal year 1996.
    Columbia and Lower Willamette River below Vancouver, WA, 
and Portland, OR.--The Committee is informed that for several 
years the Columbia River pilots and the lower Columbia River 
ports have been reviewing navigation concerns in the 
Brookfield/Pillar Rock stretch of the Columbia River. In view 
of these concerns, the Committee has included an additional 
$400,000 for the Corps to undertake a simulation study to 
address the problem and determine the most appropriate 
solution. The Committee has also provided $2,000,000 for the 
Corps to correct the situation when the appropriate solution in 
determined.
    The Committee is aware that the authorized 40-foot Columbia 
River channel is subject to shoaling at a number of locations 
in the river, causing restrictions in channel draft. The 
Committee directs the Corps to use its existing authorities to 
dredge a 5-foot overdraft; and, when appropriate, to conduct 
advanced maintenance dredging to assure that project depth of 
40 feet is maintained to the maximum extent possible.
    Pipestem Dam and Lake, SD-ND.--The Committee understands 
that serious flooding in 1993, 1995, and 1996 indicates that 
there may be significant impacts in South Dakota, including 
channel capacity that is less than the minimum flood control 
release. The Committee recommendation includes $52,000, the 
same amount included in the budget, for the Corps to evaluate 
the South Dakota impacts along the James River in South Dakota, 
including the evaluation of the water control plan.
    Jamaica, VT.--The Committee understands that the Corps of 
Engineers will reach a final plan in the near future on how to 
protect against accidental sediment releases from Ball Mountain 
Lake Dam. To the extent feasible, the Corps should expedite the 
process of selecting a final plan and move toward 
implementation. Once a final decision is approved, the Corps 
should use available funds to undertake the plan which will 
ensure long-term protection of water quality and habitat 
downstream of the dam.
    Grays Harbor, Chehalis River, WA.--Funding in the amount of 
$530,000 has been included in the bill for the Corps to 
complete studies to determine the most appropriate long-term 
solution to the erosion problems with the Federal navigation 
project at Grays Harbor, and to initiate final design and 
environmental documentation for the selected measures.
    Fox River (Appleton Dam), WI.--The Committee has provided 
an additional $300,000 for the Corps to finalize plans and 
proceed with construction of a seepage barrier Appleton Dam, 
Fox River, WI.
    In addition, the attention of the Corps of Engineers is 
directed to the following projects in need of maintenance or 
review and for which the Committee has received requests: 
Brunswick Harbor, GA.

                           regulatory program

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $101,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     112,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             101,000,000

    An appropriation of $101,000,000 is recommended for 
regulatory programs of the Corps of Engineers.
    This appropriation provides for salaries and related costs 
to administer laws pertaining to regulation of navigable waters 
and wetlands of the United States in accordance with the Rivers 
and Harbors Act of 1899, the Clean Water Act of 1977, and the 
Marine Protection Act of 1972.
    The Committee is aware of the Corps desire to undertake an 
administrative appeal process related to their permit decisions 
and jurisdiction determinations which allows the public to 
challenge permit decisions without costly and lengthy court 
actions. The Committee urges the Corps to explore ways to 
implement this appeals process within the recommended program 
resources.

                 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $10,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      15,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              10,000,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,000,000 
for flood control and coastal emergencies. This is $5,000,000 
below the budget request.
    This activity provides for flood emergency preparation, 
flood fighting and rescue operations, and repair of flood 
control and Federal hurricane or shore protection works. It 
also provides for emergency supplies of clean drinking water 
where the source has been contaminated and in drought 
distressed areas, provision of adequate supplies of water for 
human and livestock consumption.

                           oilspill research

Appropriations, 1996....................................        $850,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................         850,000

Committee recommendation

                                                                 850,000

    An appropriation of $850,000 is recommended for oilspill 
research for fiscal year 1997, which is the same as the budget 
request and the funding level for the current fiscal year.
    Section 7001 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 established 
an Interagency Coordinating Committee on Oil Pollution Research 
to develop a plan for, and coordinate the implementation of an 
oil pollution research, development, and demonstration program. 
Title VII of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 also authorizes use 
of the oilspill liability trust fund to perform oil pollution 
research.
    As a member of the Interagency Coordinating Committee, the 
Corps of Engineers participates in the research program through 
the development of advanced displays, maps, and data management 
utilizing satellite and/or aircraft imaging data. These 
management tools will be developed for the on-the-scene spill 
coordinator's use for optimal allocation of resources and 
timely response to the specific oilspill situation.

                            general expenses

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $151,500,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     153,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             153,000,000

    This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office, 
Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research 
and statistical functions of the Corps of Engineers. The 
Committee recommends an appropriation of $153,000,000 which is 
the same as the budget request.

                           GENERAL PROVISION

    Corps hopper dredges, (sec. 107).--For the past 4 fiscal 
years, Congress has made available to the private dredge fleet 
7.5 million cubic yards of work which had been accomplished in 
earlier years by the Federal hopper dredge fleet. The Committee 
recommendation continues the 7.5 million cubic yard set-aside 
in fiscal year 1997. During the period in which any of the 
Federal hopper dredges is out of service for lengthy repair or 
rehabilitation, reallocating this entire 7.5 million cubic 
yards among the three remaining Federal dredges would require 
further reduction in their days of service, thus making their 
operation more costly and less competitive. If any of the four 
Federal dredges is removed from service for repair or 
rehabilitation and is prevented from accomplishing the level of 
work it has carried out during the past 3 fiscal years, the 
Committee directs the Corps to reduce the 7.5 million cubic 
yards amount contained in subsection (a) by the share allocated 
to that dredge over the past 3 fiscal years which has been put 
out for bid for the private industry.
    Authority to reprogram, obligate, and expend funds on 
ongoing construction projects.--The Committee has included a 
provision in the bill which will prevent the unintentional 
slowing or shutting down of contract work at specifically 
funded ongoing construction projects because of insufficient 
funding.
    The language in the bill, similar to that contained in 
Public Law 103-50, the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1993, 
and Public Law 103-126, the Energy and Water Development Act of 
1994, permits the Corps of Engineers to continue work, within 
established reprogramming authority, until additional funding 
is provided, and if appropriate, remedial bill language is 
enacted. The Committee expects this authority to be used 
sparingly and only after other measures allowed by statute or 
regulation have been exhausted.
    When exercising this authority, the Assistant Secretary of 
the Army for Civil Works will notify the Committees on 
Appropriations of the House and Senate as to the circumstances 
by which it becomes necessary to use the authority and explain 
what corrective actions have, will, or should be taken to 
preclude recurrence.
                  TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

                Central Utah Project Completion Account

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $44,139,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      43,627,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              43,627,000

    The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 1997 to carry 
out the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act 
is $43,627,000, the same as the budget request.
    The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II-VI of 
Public Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the central 
Utah project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District. 
The act also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish, 
wildlife, and recreation mitigation and conservation; 
establishes an account in the Treasury for the deposit of these 
funds and of other contributions for mitigation and 
conservation activities; and establishes a Utah Reclamation 
Mitigation and Conservation Commission to administer funds in 
that account. The act further assigns responsibilities for 
carrying out the act to the Secretary of the Interior and 
prohibits delegation of those responsibilities to the Bureau of 
Reclamation.

                         Bureau of Reclamation

                         general investigations

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $12,684,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      15,095,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              18,105,000

    An appropriation of $18,105,000 is recommended by the 
Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of 
Reclamation.
    The recommended amounts provided under this account for 
surveys and planning activities are shown in the following 
table, with Committee comments following immediately after the 
tabulation.

                                  BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS                                 
                                              [Amounts in dollars]                                              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Total Federal   Allocated to       Budget         Committee  
                  Project title                        cost            date          estimate     recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                
                     ARIZONA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
HOPI WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY.....................         900,000  ..............          80,000          80,000
NAVAJO WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY...................         900,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
SOUTHERN ARIZONA REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY         500,000  ..............         150,000         150,000
WEST SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER RESOURCES MGMT                                                                     
 STUDY..........................................  ..............  ..............  ..............         100,000
                                                                                                                
                   CALIFORNIA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
DELTA MODEL DEVELOPMENT GROUP...................         490,000  ..............          90,000          90,000
FRIANT UPPER BASIN OPTIMIZATION AND REUSE STUDY.         100,000  ..............          75,000          75,000
IMPERIAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION...............         500,000         250,000         175,000         175,000
LOWER OWENS RIVER STUDY.........................         300,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
MYSTIC LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT INVESTIGATION..         550,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
NEW MELONES TEMPERTURE CONTROL EVALUATION.......          90,000  ..............          90,000          90,000
SAN FRANCISCO AREA RECLAMATION STUDY............       3,790,000       1,915,000       1,500,000       1,500,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER SUPPLY STUDY..         750,000          50,000         250,000         250,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE WATER STUDY...       3,097,000       1,578,000         750,000         750,000
VERDE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STUDY..............         500,000         250,000         125,000         125,000
                                                                                                                
                    COLORADO                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
DOLORES RIVER BASIN RUNOFF MODEL................         225,000  ..............          75,000          75,000
UPPER ARKANSAS RIVER NEEDS ASSESSMENT...........         200,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
                                                                                                                
                      IDAHO                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
IDAHO RIVER SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT..................       1,900,000         750,000         250,000         250,000
UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN SALMON MIGRATION WATER                                                                  
 STUDY..........................................       1,552,000         652,000         300,000         300,000
UPPER SALMON RIVER WATER OPTIMIZATION STUDY.....         504,000         254,000         150,000         150,000
                                                                                                                
                     KANSAS                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
CHENEY RESERVOIR WATER QUALITY INVESTIGATION....         900,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
                                                                                                                
                     MONTANA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
COLD CLIMATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT...............         875,000  ..............          35,000          35,000
FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION....................  ..............  ..............  ..............         210,000
JEFFERSON RIVER BASIN RETURN FLOW STUDY.........         400,000  ..............          80,000          80,000
MONTANA RIVER SYSTEMS STUDY.....................       1,275,000  ..............         150,000         150,000
WESTERN MONTANA WATER CONSERVATION STUDY........         729,000         579,000         150,000         150,000
YELLOWSTONE RIVER BASIN STUDY...................         320,000         120,000         100,000         100,000
                                                                                                                
                    NEBRASKA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
NEBRASKA WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT................         300,000          75,000         100,000         100,000
                                                                                                                
                     NEVADA                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
CARSON RIVER BASIN..............................  ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000
WALKER RIVER BASIN..............................  ..............  ..............  ..............         250,000
                                                                                                                
                   NEW MEXICO                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE WATER CONVEYANCE PLAN.........         200,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
RIO GRANDE/LOW FLOW CONVEYANCE CHANNEL STUDY....         480,000          75,000         200,000         200,000
SAN JUAN GALLUP-NAVAJO PIPELINE.................  ..............  ..............  ..............         150,000
                                                                                                                
                    OKLAHOMA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
OKLAHOMA WATER SUPPLY STUDY.....................         375,000          75,000         125,000         125,000
                                                                                                                
                     OREGON                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSERVATION                                                                   
 FEASIBIL.......................................         900,000         275,000         250,000         250,000
GRANDE RONDE WATER OPTIMIZATION STUDY...........         996,000         696,000         150,000         150,000
NORTHWEST OREGON REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY STUDY....         878,000         678,000         200,000         200,000
OREGON STREAM RESTORATION PLANNING STUDY........         944,000         644,000         150,000         150,000
OREGON SUBBASIN CONSERVATION PLANNING...........         887,000         687,000         100,000         100,000
OREGON WATER CONSERVATION PROJECTS..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       2,000,000
SOUTHERN OREGON COASTAL RIVER BASINS............         800,000         100,000         200,000         200,000
UMATILLA BASIN PROJECT, PHASE III...............         275,000  ..............         100,000         200,000
                                                                                                                
                  SOUTH DAKOTA                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
BLACK HILLS REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY.....         725,000         442,000          75,000          75,000
                                                                                                                
                      TEXAS                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
EDWARDS AQUIFER REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES AND                                                                    
 MANAGEMEN......................................         896,000         706,000         190,000         190,000
RINCON BAYOU-NUECES MARCH WETLANDS RESTORATION/                                                                 
 ENHANCE........................................         875,000         604,000         100,000         100,000
RIO GRANDE/RIO BRAVO INTERNATIONAL BASIN                                                                        
 ASSESSMENT.....................................         600,000         150,000         200,000         200,000
RIO GRANDE CONVEYANCE CANAL/PIPELINE............  ..............  ..............  ..............         200,000
                                                                                                                
                      UTAH                                                                                      
                                                                                                                
ASHLEY/BRUSH CREEK OPTIMIZATION STUDY...........         475,000          75,000         200,000         200,000
CARBON/EMERY COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.......         500,000  ..............         100,000         100,000
OGDEN RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT                                                                      
 INVESTIGATI....................................         450,000  ..............          50,000          50,000
                                                                                                                
                   WASHINGTON                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
WASHINGTON RIVER BASIN PLANNING.................         500,000          75,000         125,000         125,000
                                                                                                                
                     VARIOUS                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM      58,914,000      56,694,000         360,000         360,000
ENVIRONMENTAL AND INTERAGENCY COORDINATION                                                                      
 ACTIVITIES.....................................  ..............  ..............       1,745,000       1,745,000
GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES........................  ..............  ..............       1,985,000       1,785,000
INVESTIGATION OF EXISTING PROJECTS..............  ..............  ..............         705,000         705,000
MINOR WORK ON COMPLETED PROJECTS................  ..............  ..............         145,000         145,000
MISSOURI RIVER BASIN TRIBES IN ND/SD WATER                                                                      
 RESOURCES M....................................       1,250,000         610,000         250,000         250,000
PALLID STURGEON RECOVERY DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM         350,000         140,000         140,000         140,000
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO STATES..................  ..............  ..............       1,925,000       1,925,000
UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN STORAGE OPTIMIZATION....       1,164,000       1,114,000          50,000          50,000
                                                 ===============================================================
      TOTAL, GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.............  ..............  ..............      15,095,000      18,105,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    West Salt River Valley, AZ.--Funding in the amount of 
$100,000 has been provided for the Bureau of Reclamation to 
initiate phase I appraisal level studies of alternatives for 
water resource management of the different water sources, 
infrastructure development, and economic and environmental 
issues in the west Phoenix metropolitan area.
    San Juan River Gallup, Navajo water supply project, New 
Mexico.--The Committee has included $150,000 for the Bureau of 
Reclamation to continue activities related to the San Juan 
River Gallup, Navajo water supply project, New Mexico.
    Oregon water conservation projects, Oregon.--The Committee 
has provided $2,000,000 for the Bureau of Reclamation to 
undertake formal feasibility studies for water conservation 
projects in the Deschutes, Rogue, Umpqua, and Malheur River 
basins in Oregon. The Committee understands that the Bureau has 
not completed necessary assessments required for project 
authorization. The proposed projects would address water 
conservation measures to improve irrigation efficiencies, 
streamflow enhancements, and improvements to fish and wildlife 
habitat.

                          construction program

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $411,046,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     392,524,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             410,499,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $410,499,000 
for construction programs of the Bureau of Reclamation.
    The amounts recommended by the Committee are shown on the 
following table along with the budget request.

                                   BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM                                  
                                              [Amounts in dollars]                                              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Total Federal   Allocated to       Budget         Committee  
                  Project title                        cost            date          estimate     recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                
  CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION AND COLORADO                                                                  
                                                                                                                
                     ARIZONA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
CRBSCP, TITLE I DIVISION........................     459,038,000     402,316,000       2,300,000       2,300,000
SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT....      35,795,000  ..............       7,000,000       7,000,000
                                                                                                                
                   CALIFORNIA                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT:                                                                                         
    AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION.....................     161,961,000     141,961,000      11,000,000      11,000,000
    AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT....................   2,394,762,000     358,025,000       2,500,000       2,500,000
    DELTA DIVISION..............................     394,940,000     177,656,000       8,850,000       8,850,000
    MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS..............     543,459,000     235,937,000      14,200,000      14,200,000
    SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION...................     550,765,000     361,299,000       7,200,000       7,200,000
    SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION........................     220,561,000      41,821,000       4,737,000       4,737,000
    SAN LUIS UNIT...............................   1,509,164,000     566,252,000       2,900,000       2,900,000
    SHASTA DIVISION.............................     343,310,000     249,395,000         500,000         500,000
    TRINITY RIVER RESTORATION PROGRAM...........     326,407,000     309,728,000       5,000,000       5,000,000
LOS ANGELES AREA WATER RECLAMATION/REUSE PROGRAM      69,970,000      24,285,000      14,300,000      14,300,000
SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE                                                                      
 PROGRAM........................................     172,590,000       5,567,000       9,340,000       9,340,000
SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT, WATER RECLAMATION AND                                                                
 REUSE..........................................      38,090,000      16,403,000       5,800,000       5,800,000
SAN JOSE WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM....     109,959,000       3,164,000       2,760,000       2,760,000
                                                                                                                
                      IDAHO                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
MINIDOKA NORTH SIDE DRAINWATER PROJECT..........       1,830,000          60,000         180,000         180,000
                                                                                                                
                  NORTH DAKOTA                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
GARRISON DIVERSION UNIT, P-SMBP.................   1,483,255,000     571,622,000      21,600,000      25,000,000
                                                                                                                
                     OREGON                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
UMATILLA BASIN PROJECT..........................      57,362,000      45,062,000       4,900,000       6,100,000
                                                                                                                
                  SOUTH DAKOTA                                                                                  
                                                                                                                
BELLE FOURCHE UNIT, P-SMBP......................      62,076,000      55,173,000       5,100,000       5,100,000
MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER SYSTEM...................     119,417,000      16,001,000       2,500,000       7,500,000
MNI WICONI PROJECT..............................     250,341,000      53,157,000      28,350,000      28,350,000
                                                                                                                
                      TEXAS                                                                                     
                                                                                                                
NORTHWEST WASTEWATER REUSE PROJECT..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       2,000,000
                                                                                                                
                   WASHINGTON                                                                                   
                                                                                                                
COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT, IRRIGATION FACILITIES...   1,768,993,000   1,702,403,000       2,590,000       2,590,000
YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT....     150,327,000       1,886,000       4,475,000       4,475,000
                                                                                                                
                     VARIOUS                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
COLUMBIA/SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT....     108,504,000      22,387,000      15,000,000      15,000,000
CRBSCP, TITLE II DIVISION.......................     331,878,000     151,652,000      10,500,000      10,500,000
DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE....................  ..............  ..............  ..............       2,500,000
EFFICIENCY INCENTIVES PROGRAM...................  ..............  ..............       4,350,000       4,350,000
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION......      89,744,000      15,639,000      14,511,000      14,511,000
NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM.................      64,769,000      18,317,000       6,759,000       6,759,000
NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION...........  ..............       1,500,000       2,500,000       5,000,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, REGULAR CONSTRUCTION............  ..............  ..............      53,620,000      58,620,000
DRAINAGE AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION:                                                                                
    BOISE PROJECT, ID...........................      35,196,000      34,996,000         200,000         200,000
    BRANTLEY PROJECT, NM........................     198,703,000     144,622,000         700,000         700,000
    COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM,                                                                 
     AZ, CA,....................................     183,158,000      88,309,000       2,100,000       2,100,000
    CRSP, DALLAS CREEK PROJECT, CO..............     121,631,000     121,331,000         300,000         300,000
    KLAMATH PROJECT, OR, CA.....................      62,925,000      54,254,000       2,245,000       2,245,000
    LAKE MEREDITH SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, NM,                                                                 
     TX.........................................       3,500,000       2,919,000         100,000         100,000
    LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY PROJECT,                                                                  
     CO.........................................      21,195,000      18,595,000         650,000         650,000
    MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT, OK...................      45,459,000      43,759,000       1,700,000       1,700,000
    NEWLANDS PROJECT, CA, NV....................      73,143,000      22,214,000       6,550,000       6,550,000
    PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM:                                                                          
        NORTH LOUP DIVISION, NE.................     361,179,000     349,851,000         900,000         900,000
        OAHE UNIT, SD...........................     490,000,000      44,774,000          85,000          85,000
    RECLAMATION RECREATION MANAGEMENT ACT--TITLE                                                                
     28, VARI...................................      31,425,000      10,391,000       3,515,000       3,515,000
    RIO GRANDE PROJECT, NM, TX..................       2,000,000       1,000,000       1,000,000       1,000,000
    SAN LUIS VALLEY, CLOSED BASIN DIVISION, CO..      95,249,000      94,849,000         400,000         400,000
    TRES RIOS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION, AZ........       6,025,000       1,000,000         500,000         500,000
    VELARDE COMMUNITY DITCH, NM.................      30,550,000      14,035,000       2,000,000       3,200,000
    WETLANDS DEVELOPMENT, VARIOUS...............      51,483,840      16,224,000       3,938,000       3,938,000
    YAKIMA FISH PASSAGE/PROTECTIVE FACILITIES,                                                                  
     WA.........................................      47,351,000      46,981,000         370,000         370,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, DRAINAGE AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION.  ..............  ..............      27,253,000      28,453,000
SAFETY OF DAMS PROGRAM:                                                                                         
    CROOKED RIVER PROJECT, OCHOCO DAM, OR.......      14,605,000      13,705,000         900,000         900,000
    CVP, FOLSOM DAM (MORMON ISLAND), CA.........      29,930,000      22,913,000       1,750,000       1,750,000
    DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM, VARIOUS......      16,151,000      10,151,000       1,200,000       1,200,000
    INITIATE SAFETY OF DAMS CORRECTIVE ACTION...     483,335,000      75,773,000      25,050,000      25,050,000
    SAFETY OF DAMS CORRECTIVE ACTION STUDIES....      57,699,000      47,870,000       2,500,000       2,500,000
    SALT RIVER PROJECT, BARTLETT DAM, AZ........      35,167,000      31,870,000       3,097,000       3,097,000
    SALT RIVER PROJECT, HORSESHOE DAM, AZ.......      22,773,000      22,148,000         403,000         403,000
    SAN ANGELO PROJECT, TWIN BUTTES DAM, TX.....      60,000,000      14,817,000      23,000,000      23,000,000
    SAN CARLOS IRRIGATION PROJECT, COOLIDGE DAM,                                                                
     AZ.........................................      48,203,000      47,981,000         221,000         221,000
    SCOFIELD PROJECT, SCOFIELD DAM, UT..........       2,500,000       2,000,000         500,000         500,000
    YAKIMA PROJECT, BUMPING LAKE DAM, WA........       5,086,000       4,446,000         640,000         640,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, SAFEY OF DAMS PROGRAM...........  ..............  ..............      59,261,000      59,261,000
REHABILITATION AND BETTERMENT:                                                                                  
    SHOSHONE PROJECT, WY........................       7,500,000       6,040,000       1,459,000       1,459,000
    WEBER BASIN PROJECT, UT.....................      19,639,000      14,201,000       1,700,000       1,700,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, REHABILITATION AND BETTERMENT...  ..............  ..............       3,159,000       3,159,000
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY:                                                                                         
    GROUNDWATER RECHARGE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM..      25,081,000      24,249,000         540,000       1,415,000
    IMPROVED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT CONTROL                                                                     
     SYSTEM (PHAS...............................       1,200,000  ..............         400,000         400,000
    TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT......................       2,002,000         282,000         400,000         400,000
    WATERSHED RIVER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROGRAM...       4,000,000       1,897,000       1,000,000       1,000,000
    WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY..................      17,176,000       7,166,000       2,000,000       1,300,000
    WATER TECHNOLOGY/ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH.....     134,962,000      37,712,000       3,800,000       3,800,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY..........  ..............  ..............       8,140,000       8,315,000
                                                 ===============================================================
      TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION AND                                                                
       COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL                                                                    
       PROJECTS.................................  ..............  ..............     319,515,000     337,490,000
                                                 ===============================================================
         COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT                                                                         
                                                                                                                
       UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN FUND AND                                                                      
             PARTICIPATING PROJECTS                                                                             
                                                                                                                
                    COLORADO                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
ANIMAS-LA PLATA PARTICIIPATING PROJECT..........     437,744,000     629,980,000       9,500,000       9,500,000
DOLORES PARTICIPATING PROJECT...................     549,262,000     530,820,000       6,115,000       6,115,000
                                                                                                                
                      UTAH                                                                                      
                                                                                                                
CENTRAL UTAH PARTICIPATING PROJECT, BONNEVILLE                                                                  
 UNIT...........................................   1,231,301,000   1,218,744,000       7,495,000       7,495,000
RECREATIONAL AND FISH AND WILDLIFE FACILITIES...      80,694,000      18,624,000       2,440,000       2,440,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT.....  ..............  ..............      25,550,000      25,550,000
                                                                                                                
          COLORADO RIVER BASIN PROJECT                                                                          
                                                                                                                
             CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT                                                                            
                                                                                                                
                     ARIZONA                                                                                    
                                                                                                                
CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT, WATER DEVELOPMENT                                                                      
 (LCRBDF).......................................   4,190,701,000   3,235,672,000      71,728,000      71,728,000
CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT, SAFETY OF DAMS.........     138,487,000     130,205,000       4,918,000       4,918,000
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, COLORADO RIVER BASIN PROJECT.......  ..............  ..............      76,646,000      76,646,000
                                                                                                                
                ASSOCIATED ITEMS                                                                                
                                                                                                                
UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION BASED ON ANTICIPATED                                                                    
 DELAYS.........................................  ..............  ..............     -29,187,000     -29,187,000
                                                 ===============================================================
      TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM...............  ..............  ..............     392,524,000     410,499,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Animas-La Plata [ALP] project, Colorado.--It is the desire 
of this Committee that the Secretary comply with the directive 
issued by Congress last year and proceed without delay to 
construct those portions of the Animas-La Plata project (stage 
A) which were approved by the Fish and Wildlife Service under 
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. section 1531 
et seq. In the event that the funding provided to the Bureau is 
inadequate for the tasks to be accomplished this year, the 
Committee expects the Bureau to reprogram any available funds 
to the project for construction. When it passed the Colorado 
Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988, Congress 
endorsed the project as the vehicle for settlement of the water 
rights of the two Colorado Ute Indian Tribes. Congress intended 
that by the year 2000, the project would provide the tribes 
with substantial quantities of water for their future use. The 
need for environmental compliance does not mean that the terms 
of that agreement may be rewritten.
    As a result of the section 7 process, the final 
configuration of the project remains uncertain. The Committee 
understands that the Bureau of Reclamation has done a superb 
job in describing the various stages through which the project 
may progress, the impacts and required mitigation for each 
stage, and the utility associated with each stage. In addition, 
the State of Colorado has always supported this project and has 
committed $42,600,000 (plus interest) to the project. For 
purpose of initiating construction of stage A, the existing 
repayment obligations of the parties contracting for water, 
along with the commitments of the States of Colorado and New 
Mexico, provide adequate assurances that the United States will 
be repaid in connection with the construction of those 
facilities.
    The Committee is aware that the San Juan River and its 
tributaries do not consistently meet New Mexico's newly adopted 
water quality standards for selenium and that there is concern 
over the potential effect of the operations of the ALP 
facilities in Colorado on this existing problem. The Secretary 
should take reasonable steps to assist Colorado and New Mexico 
in improving the quality of surface flows by addressing the 
problems caused by nonpoint sources.
    The Committee is also aware that the ESA has the potential 
to limit water development in the San Juan basin, including the 
completion of ALP and the Navajo Indian irrigation project. The 
Committee remains confident that the San Juan River Recovery 
Implementation Program will achieve its stated objectives of: 
(1) recovering the endangered fish and (2) permitting water 
development to proceed. Although the precise level of 
development that will ultimately be allowed cannot be 
determined at this time, the immediate construction of stage A 
is required if the United States is to meet the terms of the 
Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988. The 
present documentation is fully informative of these issues and 
construction of the first stage of the project may proceed 
without adversely affecting any other water users on the San 
Juan system.
    The Committee notes that the section 404(b)(1) analysis 
required by 33 U.S.C. 1344(r) has been received by the 
Congress.
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.--The recommendation 
for the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation includes 
$2,500,000 for a wetland restoration project to be carried out 
jointly between the foundation, Bureau of Reclamation, Fish and 
Wildlife Service, the Department of Agriculture National 
Conservation Service, and non-Federal interest along the 
Williamson River, in Klamath County, OR.
    The Committee understands that the legislation authorizing 
appropriations to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 
requires that non-Federal sources match one for one each 
Federal fish and wildlife dollar. The Committee supports this 
level of matching funding as a minimum. But in this time of 
serious budget constraints, the Committee feels that more can 
and should be provided through non-Federal sources, who in many 
cases benefit just as much or more than Federal reclamation 
activities. Therefore, it is the Committee's expectation that, 
while not required by law, the foundation will make every 
effort to secure a two or three to one non-Federal contribution 
on projects and activities undertaken through these 
appropriations. Further, the Committee directs the Bureau of 
Reclamation to submit to the Committee as soon as practical 
after the end of the fiscal year a status report on how the 
funding for the previous year has been allocated by project, 
the level and source of funding both Federal and non-Federal, a 
completion schedule for each project, and an analysis of the 
unobligated and unexpended balances related to these 
appropriations.
    Garrison diversion project, North Dakota.--The Committee 
recommendation for the Garrison diversion project is 
$25,000,000, an increase of $3,400,000 over the budget request 
for the Bureau of Reclamation to continue development of rural 
and municipal water systems, Indian water systems, wetland 
mitigation, and wildlife enhancement activities.
    Umatilla basin project, Oregon.--An additional $1,200,000 
has been provided for the Umatilla basin project in Oregon for 
the Bureau of Reclamation to complete phases I and II of the 
project. The Committee has also included language in the bill 
increasing the project cost ceiling so the project can proceed 
through completion without having to terminate ongoing contract 
work.
    Central Utah project, Utah.--The Committee is aware that 
beginning in fiscal 1996, the repayment credit provisions of 
section 206 of the Energy and Water Development Act for 1996 
(Public Law 99-591) became effective. The Bureau of Reclamation 
has incorrectly interpreted the substantially complete 
declaration provision of section 206 to be applicable only to 
its own activities and not to the Bonneville unit. The 
Committee directs the Bureau to apply the provisions of section 
206 of Public Law 99-591 until such time as the Bonneville unit 
is declared to be substantially complete, as determined by the 
Secretary of the Interior, but in no case beyond fiscal year 
2000.
    Endangered species recovery implementation.--The Committee 
has provided funding for reclamation's participation in the 
development and implementation of the multi-State basinwide 
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program. It is the 
Committee's intent that these funds may be used for program 
development and implementation, including habitat conservation, 
water conservation, and program administration.
    Ground Water Recharge Demonstration Program.--The Committee 
recommendation for the Ground Water Recharge Demonstration 
Program includes $875,000 for the Bureau of Reclamation to 
continue the Equus beds recharge project in Kansas. The 
Committee understands that the project is being cost shared on 
a 50-50 basis.
    In situ copper mining research.--The in situ copper mining 
research project has been transferred to the Bureau of 
Reclamation from the Bureau of Mines. It is the understanding 
of the Committee that sufficient funds were transferred with 
the project to support the Bureau of Reclamation's in-house 
research and oversight responsibility through the conclusion of 
the program. Sufficient fiscal year 1997 funds should also be 
available for the field test. Any funds transferred from the 
in-house oversight amount to cover field test shortfalls must 
be cost shared by the private sector partner as stipulated in 
project contracts. The Bureau of Reclamation should also 
examine the research data to explore the application of the 
technology to other Bureau programs.
    Drought emergency assistance.--The Committee is aware of 
the severe drought condition in New Mexico and several other 
Western States and that authority for appropriations under the 
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991, Public 
Law 102-250, expires at the end of fiscal year 1996. In 
response to the current emergency conditions, the Committee has 
recommended a provision in the bill to extend the authority to 
make appropriations through 1997, and has included $2,500,000 
for the Bureau of Reclamation to undertake emergency measures 
as provide under Public Law 102-250.

                       operation and maintenance

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $273,076,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     292,876,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             280,876,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $280,876,000. 
This is $12,000,000 below the budget request. This reduction is 
necessary because of the severe budgetary limitations for non-
Defense discretionary programs.
    The appropriation recommended under this heading provides 
for the maintenance, reliability, and operational readiness of 
348 storage reservoirs and 254 diversion dams, thousands of 
miles of canals, water distribution systems, and drains; more 
than 260 pumping plants; 58 powerplants; and recreation 
facilities so that protection of the Federal investment is 
maintained. The operation and maintenance program also provides 
for the management and protection of the waters, lands, and 
other natural resources associated with reclamation 
developments.
    The Committee recommendation includes $450,000 for the 
upper Rio Grande water operation model study in New Mexico. The 
additional funding over the budgeted amount will allow 
acceleration of the model to be responsive to current drought 
conditions and other current water resource management issues.
    The Committee is concerned that the scope of the long-term 
monitoring and research program authorized in section 1805 of 
the Grand Canyon Protection Act is being expanded beyond the 
parameters established in the act and intended by Congress. The 
Committee believes the purpose of the monitoring and research 
program is to ensure that Glen Canyon Dam is operated in a 
manner consistent with that of section 1802 and is meeting the 
objectives established in the Glen Canyon environmental impact 
statement. It is not intended to be a basic science research 
program or to permit studies on issues not directly related to 
the operation of the dam. To prevent the unauthorized expansion 
of the monitoring and research program and overspending, the 
Committee directs the Secretary to include in the annual budget 
justification for the Bureau of Reclamation, a detailed work 
program and budget information that includes staffing, 
overhead, tasks, and an explanation of the role the Glen Canyon 
Environmental Studies Program will play in the monitoring and 
research program. That budget justification shall also include 
a projection for the monitoring and research program costs for 
the following 5 out-years. The Secretary shall submit this 
information to this Committee, to the Senate Energy and Natural 
Resources Committee, and to the House Appropriation and 
Resources Committes.

               bureau of reclamation loan program account

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $11,668,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      12,715,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              12,715,000

    The Committee concurs with the House in recommending an 
appropriation of $12,715,000, the same as the budget request, 
for the small reclamation program of the Bureau of Reclamation.
    Under the Small Reclamation Projects Act (43 U.S.C. 422a-
422l), loans and/or grants can be made to non-Federal 
organizations for construction or rehabilitation and betterment 
of small water resource projects.
    As required by the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, this 
account records the subsidy costs associated with the direct 
loans, as well as administrative expenses of this program.
    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:
    Offset folio 00 Bureau of Reclamation loan program table 
inserts here




                                                  LOAN PROGRAM                                                  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total                                             
                      Project title                          Federal     Allocated      Budget       Committee  
                                                               cost       to date      estimate   recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         ARIZONA                                                                                
                                                                                                                
Tohono O'Odham Nation--Schuk Toak District...............   $5,353,000   $3,543,000   $1,810,000     $1,810,000 
                                                                                                                
                        CALIFORNIA                                                                              
                                                                                                                
Castroville irrigation water supply project..............   13,813,000    2,564,000    2,000,000      2,000,000 
Chino basin desalination project, Santa Ana Watershed....    8,200,000    2,000,000    1,650,000      1,650,000 
Eastern Municipal Water District No. 3...................   13,650,000   12,620,000    1,030,000      1,030,000 
Salinas Valley water reclamation facility for crop                                                              
 irrigation..............................................    8,973,000    2,000,000    1,500,000      1,500,000 
Temescal Valley project, Elsinore Valley municipal water.    5,268,000    1,050,000    1,650,000      1,650,000 
                                                                                                                
                          OREGON                                                                                
                                                                                                                
Milltown Hill project, Douglas County....................   16,899,000      100,000    2,650,000      2,650,000 
                                                                                                                
                         VARIOUS                                                                                
                                                                                                                
Loan administration......................................  ...........  ...........      425,000        425,000 
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
      Total, loan program................................  ...........  ...........   12,715,000     12,715,000 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                central valley project restoration fund

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $43,579,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      38,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              38,000,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $38,000,000, 
the same as the budget request.
    The Central Valley project restoration fund was authorized 
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of 
Public Law 102-575. This fund was established to provide 
funding from project beneficiaries for habitat restoration, 
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife 
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of 
California. Revenues are derived from payments by project 
beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project 
beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant 
Division surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to 
non-CVP users, and tiered water prices) and, to the extent 
required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation 
and restoration payments.
    The Committee recommendation includes funding to undertake 
the Rock Slough fish screen project.

                    general administrative expenses

Appropriation, 1995.....................................     $48,150,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      48,971,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              48,971,000

    The Committee recommendation for general administrative 
expenses is $48,971,000. This is the same as the budget 
request.
    The general administrative expenses program provides for 
the executive direction and management of all reclamation 
activities, as performed by the Commissioner's offices in 
Washington, DC, Denver, CO, and five regional offices. The 
Denver office and regional offices charge individual projects 
or activities for direct beneficial services and related 
administrative and technical costs. These charges are covered 
under other appropriations.
    The Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000 to support 
the final activities of the Western Water Policy Review 
Commission.
                    TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    Funds recommended in title III provide for Department of 
Energy programs relating to: energy supply, research and 
development activities; uranium supply and enrichment 
activities; the uranium enrichment decontamination and 
decommissioning fund; general science and research activities; 
the nuclear waste disposal fund; atomic energy defense 
activities; departmental administration; the Office of 
Inspector General; power marketing administrations; and the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

                        committee recommendation

    As was the case with the Committee's recommendation for 
fiscal year 1996, funding recommendations for Department of 
Energy programs in fiscal year 1997 are significantly below the 
Department's fiscal year 1997 budget request in many areas. 
Because this trend can be expected to continue, the Department 
should not delay efforts to reduce the scope of certain 
programs and the number of Federal employees at headquarters 
and in the field. Any delay, as occurred in fiscal year 1996, 
will simply increase reductions that will have to be made at a 
later date.
    Reductions in Federal employees are necessary for 
programmatic as well as budgetary reasons. The Department's 
administration has become too cumbersome and, partially as a 
result of its size, the Department has lost its programmatic 
focus. Management has devoted its attention to process issues 
such as the openness initiative, strategic alignment 
initiative, and contract reform, instead of on defining and 
achieving programmatic goals.
    The Department's missions in energy supply and research, 
the environment, and national security are compelling and 
justify a significant Federal commitment. Unfortunately, the 
Department's system of administration has increased costs and 
reduced output. If this trend is not reversed it will seriously 
jeopardize the future of the Department and may lead to its 
replacement with an organization better suited to the 
management of the Department's resources. The Committee has 
modified the Department's budget request to address these and 
other issues.
    For guidance on implementing the reductions proposed by the 
Committee, the Committee recommends its fiscal year 1996 report 
and particularly the references to the findings of the Galvin 
Commission.

                         laboratory management

    The Committee concurs with the insights of the Galvin task 
force regarding the management of Department laboratories. The 
Committee is frustrated by the Department's lack of progress in 
either implementing the far-reaching solutions proposed by the 
Galvin report or proposing alternative solutions to the 
inefficient and oppressive oversight and regulation endured by 
the laboratories. The Department's inability to make meaningful 
reforms in these areas has resulted in increased cost and 
reduced productivity at the national laboratories that, if 
allowed to continue, could jeopardize the laboratories' ability 
to fulfill their missions.
    The Committee is encouraged by DOE's ongoing consideration 
of moving to outside regulation of the laboratories and 
strongly endorses any approach that removes the duplication of 
oversight that currently exists between DOE and outside 
regulators.

                            control of funds

    The Committee is aware that the Department imposes strict 
reporting and cost control requirements on funds allocated to 
contractors. Such requirements are sometimes necessary. 
However, in cases involving experienced contractors with 
demonstrated accounting systems, these requirements may result 
in a greater cost than benefit to Federal and contractor 
managers. The Committee encourages the Department to identify 
experienced contractors with demonstrated accounting systems 
with which the Department will devise less burdensome reporting 
and control requirements.

                            aging facilities

    The time and expense required for the Department to design 
and construct nonnuclear and nonscientific facilities is 
substantially greater than that for non-Federal entities. The 
Committee recommends the Department implement facilities 
procurement guidelines that match best business practices and 
provide contractors increased flexibility in the procurement of 
nonnuclear and nonscientific facilities. In particular, the 
Committee recommends that the Department and its contractors 
design and construct nonnuclear facilities to State and local 
building codes.

          energy supply, research, and development activities

Appropriations, 1996....................................  $2,727,407,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................   3,020,497,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           2,749,043,000

    The appropriations recommended for energy supply, research, 
and development activities provide for the Department of 
Energy's solar and renewable energy programs; environment, 
safety, and health; nuclear energy programs; energy research 
programs including fusion, biological and environmental 
research, and basic energy sciences; and environmental 
restoration programs.
    The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 1997 supports 
to the extent possible the role of Federal participation in 
basic research and development programs in energy supply 
activities. Due to budget constraints, significant reductions 
in certain of the Department's programs are necessary.

                       SOLAR AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $275,213,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     363,245,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             246,641,000

    Solar energy.--Funding for fiscal year 1997 is $159,800,000 
and will support both basic and applied research and technology 
development. The Committee supports the National Renewable 
Energy Laboratory's work in association with other national 
laboratories in renewable energy technology development. While 
current budget constraints prevent the Committee from funding 
the solar programs at higher levels, the Committee believes 
that the resources provided will be sufficient to maintain the 
program at a level which will result in continuing advances in 
solar technologies.
    Photovoltaics.--The Committee has provided $65,000,000, the 
same as the amount provided in fiscal year 1996, for 
photovoltaic energy systems. From within such available funds, 
$2,000,000 shall be made available to support the ongoing 
research in photovoltaics being conducted by the Southeast and 
Southwest Regional Photovoltaic Experiment Station.
    The Committee is concerned that the Utility Photovoltaic 
Group [UPVG] provides funding for cost-shared projects in which 
the total cost per watt is many times the cost at which 
photovoltaic technologies will ever be commercially 
competitive. The Committee urges the Department to review UPVG 
projects to determine if projects that exceed $10 per watt 
should be funded.
    The Committee supports the development of integrated 
roofing materials and other technologies which blend 
photovoltaic systems and architectural components. The 
Committee encourages the Department to continue its support for 
such technologies.
    Biofuels.--The Committee recommendation includes 
$55,300,000 for biofuels energy systems, an amount equal to the 
amount provided in fiscal year 1996. An amount of $27,650,000 
is allocated for the category of biochemical conversion, of 
which $3,000,000 is for the Federal share of a 50/50 cost-
shared biomass ethanol production plant in Gridley, CA, and 
$24,650,000 is for biochemical conversion research converting 
biomass to ethanol. Within the remaining funds, the Committee 
has provided the amount of the budget request to complete 
technology development of a hot-gas filtration system, with 
demonstration on the Hawaii gasifier. This funding will 
complete the project. Also, funding has been included for the 
wood burning gasifier in Burlington, VT. Within the remaining 
funds, the Committee has provided funds for feedstock 
development at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and has provided 
$3,000,000 for the regional biomass program.
    The Committee urges the Department to continue funding for 
high-quality, peer-reviewed, university-based research with 
practical applications in the Biofuels Program.
    Wind.--Advances in wind energy technologies have reduced 
the price of newly installed wind generated electricity from 35 
cents/kWh in 1980 to 4 cents/kWh today. While the Department's 
goal to reduce that cost to 2.5 cents/kWh by the year 2000 is 
laudable, the technology is now sufficiently competitive in 
select markets that the private sector should substantially 
replace the Federal Government as a funding source for 
additional technology development. For that reason, and due to 
significant budget constraints, the Committee recommends 
$15,000,000 for wind energy systems, a reduction of $17,500,000 
from the amount provided in fiscal year 1996.
    Geothermal.--The Committee recommendation is $30,500,000, a 
$608,000 increase over the amount provided in fiscal year 1996.
    The Geothermal Energy Program addresses the use of heat 
from the Earth for electricity generation, direct heating of 
facilities, and for geothermal heat pumps. State-of-the-art, 
properly designed geothermal installations need relatively 
little surface area, do not contaminate ground water supplies, 
and are benign to the atmosphere. The purpose of the geothermal 
program is to reduce economic and technological barriers to 
expanded use of this technology through Government-industry 
cost-shared efforts involving research, development, and 
demonstration.
    The Committee recommendation includes the full amount of 
the budget request to implement the Lake County, CA, project to 
inject treated wastewater effluent into the Geysers steamfield 
and to complete the feasibility study for piping effluents from 
Santa Rosa to the Geysers steamfield.
    The Committee has provided $300,000, the same as the budget 
request, for the Geo-Heat Center at the Oregon Institute of 
Technology.
    Hydrogen research.--The Committee proposes to fund hydrogen 
research at $9,000,000. The reduction from the requested amount 
of $11,012,000 is necessitated by budget pressures.
    Hydropower.--The Committee has provided $1,500,000, equal 
to the amount provided in fiscal year 1996, to continue the 
cost-shared, fish friendly turbine program.
    Electric energy systems and storage.--The Committee 
recommendation for electric energy systems and storage is 
$32,000,000, an increase of $1,691,000 over the amount provided 
in fiscal year 1996.
    The Committee recommendation includes $8,000,000, the 
requested amount, for the final year of the electric and 
magnetic fields research and development program.
    The Committee is aware of the success of the Defense 
Advanced Research Project Agency in the development of aluminum 
continuous fiber reinforced metal matrix composites which are 
economically affordable. These composites appear to have 
substantial potential for improving the efficiency of electric 
power transmission through the substitution of metal matrix 
composites for the steel cores now included in electric 
transmission wire. Improvements of over 60 percent to 180 
percent have been projected.
    The Committee encourages the Department to budget funds for 
fiscal year 1998 to evaluate the application of metal matrix 
composites for this purpose and would expeditiously review an 
appropriate reprogramming of fiscal year 1997 funds to begin 
evaluation of this project immediately. The Department is 
directed to report to the Committee on plans for this 
evaluation not later than March 15, 1997.
    Renewable energy production incentive.--Within funds 
otherwise available for solar and renewable energy utility 
sector, $1,000,000 is provided to continue the renewable energy 
production incentive program, and the Committee recommends the 
Department give priority to funding applications for the Short 
Mountain and Coffin Butte landfill methane projects.
    Renewable energy utilization.--The Committee is concerned 
that current economic considerations are not favorable for the 
widespread utilization of renewable energy technologies if the 
electricity generation and distribution markets are 
restructured. Therefore, the Committee agrees that the 
Department may use funds, not to exceed $3,000,000, from within 
amounts otherwise made available for solar and renewable energy 
utility sector programs and activities, to conduct research 
involving electric industry restructuring and its impacts on 
renewable energy utilization. These funds shall not be used for 
support services contractors or for policy advocacy, but rather 
shall be used for objective research of use to State and 
Federal decisionmakers.
    Program direction.--The Committee recommendation for solar 
and renewable program direction is $13,841,000, a 20-percent 
reduction from the amount requested.

                        nuclear energy programs

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $230,973,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     248,054,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             229,734,000

    Due to budget pressures, the Committee recommends a number 
of changes to the Department's request for nuclear energy 
programs.
    Advanced light water reactor programs.--These programs 
include a broad range of activities designed to ensure the 
availability of a viable nuclear powerplant option to serve the 
electric energy requirements in the next century. Program 
activities are concentrated on achieving Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission [NRC] certification of evolutionary and advanced 
light water reactor [ALWR] plant designs, promoting commercial 
standardization of plant equipment and systems, and supporting 
the continued operation of existing nuclear powerplants for as 
long as they are safe, reliable, and economical.
    The Committee recommends $22,000,000 for the advanced light 
water reactor program, a reduction of $18,000,000. No funds are 
provided under this program for the first-of-a-kind engineering 
program. Completing design certification for evolutionary and 
passive nuclear powerplants requires satisfying the new NRC 
design and certification process provided under 10 CFR Part 52 
as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 1992. Funds provided are 
the minimum necessary to meet the Department's obligation to 
the cost-shared program with utilities and industry and to 
bring the activities to an orderly completion.
    Advanced radioisotope power systems.--Radioisotope 
thermoelectric generators [RTG's] provide electrical power for 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] spacecraft 
and to power important national security systems. Work is 
continuing to design, fabricate, and assemble RTG's and 
radioisotope heat generators for delivery to NASA for use on 
the Cassini mission in late 1997. The Committee recommends 
$38,810,000 for fiscal year 1997, a reduction of $1,190,000 
from the amount provided in fiscal year 1996.
    Nuclear technology research and development.--This program 
supports research and development of technologies on high-
priority electrometallurgical treatment of spent nuclear fuel 
for safe storage and ultimate disposition. Due to budget 
constraints, the Committee recommends $20,000,000 for this 
program and defers without prejudice the establishment and 
operation of an international nuclear safety center as proposed 
until better budget allocations permit the Committee to provide 
sufficient funds.
    Other nuclear energy programs.--The Committee has 
reluctantly reduced funds available for university reactor fuel 
assistance and support, landlord activities at the Oak Ridge 
National Laboratory, and test reactor area landlord costs.
    Termination costs.--The Committee has provided $97,100,000 
for termination costs within the nuclear energy program. This 
includes final closeout costs for the first-of-a-kind 
engineering program which the Committee directs be terminated 
ahead of schedule.
    Isotope support.--The Committee recommendation for isotope 
support is $17,704,000 which includes $5,000,000 to implement 
the Department's record of decision on the production of moly-
99.
    Program direction.--The Committee has provided $14,800,000 
for nuclear energy program direction, a 20-percent reduction 
from the amount requested.

                    environment, safety, and health

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $128,433,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     112,206,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              94,437,000

    The Environmental, Safety, and Health Program [ES&H] was 
established to assure protection of the environment, safety, 
and health of DOE workers, the public, and DOE property. The 
ES&H Program implements these goals by defining DOE policy, 
providing guidance and technical assistance, performing safety-
related research of a generic nature, and performing 
independent overview and assessment.
    Much criticism has been heard regarding excessive 
compliance reviews and audits of field facilities and 
laboratories. With the reduction in funding resources, the 
Committee expects the Department to make every effort to 
coordinate reviews and eliminate excessive oversight by 
headquarters and field organizations, and to reduce the use of 
support service contract employees to perform Federal 
functions.
    Radiation Effects Research Foundation.--The Committee is 
aware of and pleased with the findings of the blue ribbon panel 
appointed by the Secretary to review the Radiation Effects 
Research Foundation. The panel's findings are a strong 
endorsement of the National Academy of Sciences as manager of 
the foundation.
    In light of the Department's recent commitment to a revised 
5-year funding agreement for the Radiation Effects Research 
Foundation and to maintain the current role of the National 
Academy of Sciences, the Committee has provided the full amount 
of the budget request for the Radiation Effects Research 
Foundation.
    Program direction.--The Committee recommendation for 
environment, safety, and health program direction is 
$31,237,000, a 20-percent reduction from the amount requested.

                        energy research programs

                 biological and environmental research

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $419,486,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     379,075,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             389,075,000

    This program has two main objectives: (1) to develop the 
knowledge base necessary to identify, understand, and 
anticipate the long-term health and environmental consequences 
of energy use and development; and (2) to utilize the 
Department's unique scientific and technological capabilities 
to solve major scientific problems in medicine and biology.
    The Committee is aware of the serious environmental threats 
facing the Arctic and Bering Sea ecosystem that supports the 
fishery resources of great importance to the Nation. 
Accordingly, the Committee strongly supports the atmospheric 
radiation measurement [ARM] program and the establishment of 
the third ARM site on the North Slope of Alaska. The Committee 
recommendation includes the amount of the budget request, 
$54,267,000, for climate and hydrology to ensure the timely 
completion of the ARM site on the North Slope of Alaska.
    The Committee recommendation includes $10,000,000 for the 
final phase of the Biomedical Information Communication Center 
at the Oregon Health Sciences University. The data base 
resulting from the project will be used to track the efficacy 
and effect of medical treatments, and assist in research 
efforts associated with the long-term effects of low-level 
exposure to potential environmental hazards such as radiation 
or electromagnetic fields.
    The Human Genome Program represents one of the most 
important and ambitious biological research efforts being 
pursued by the Department of Energy. The human genome contains 
about 3 billion DNA bases and some 80,000 genes, of which 
approximately 2 million DNA bases have already been sequenced. 
Considering the long-term benefits of this research project on 
human health and the development of new medical applications, 
the Committee continues its strong support of this program, and 
has provided the full budget request in the Committee's 
recommendation.
    The Committee fully supports the important work conducted 
at the Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute and the efforts 
by the Department to privatize the Institute in a manner that 
preserves its important capability, reduces costs to the 
Government, and enhances the Institute's long-term availability 
to meet Federal and non-Federal research needs. The Committee 
encourages the Department to complete the privatization in 
fiscal year 1997.
    The Committee recommendation includes the amount requested, 
$35,113,000, to complete the Environmental and Molecular 
Sciences Laboratory at the Pacific Northwest Laboratory.
    The Committee recommendation includes the amount requested 
for the Ocean Margins and the Ocean Carbon Dioxide Survey, 
$4,728,000 and $1,811,000, respectively, and directs that these 
funds be used only for these programs.
    The Committee notes that the Albert Einstein Medical Center 
in Philadelphia, PA, is establishing a new Women's Cancer 
Center as a focal point of care for its own patients and those 
of community hospitals by introducing new technologies and 
promoting and facilitating biomedical research. The Committee 
further notes that the Einstein Center is located in an area 
with nearly twice the national proportion of households with 
incomes under $15,000 per year and that cancer is a particular 
problem for the poor, who often neglect their health for 
financial reasons. The Committee directs the Department to 
consider a proposal from the Einstein Center for a research and 
health care delivery project to determine whether it meets the 
objective of using the Department's unique scientific and 
technical capabilities to solve major problems in medicine and 
biology.

                             fusion program

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $244,144,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     255,600,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             240,000,000

    The fiscal year 1996 Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act provided $244,144,000, a reduction of 
$128,419,000 or 34 percent from the amount requested, for the 
fusion energy program. In the conference report accompanying 
the act, the conferees instructed the Department to prepare, 
with the participation of the fusion community and the Fusion 
Energy Advisory Committee, a strategic plan to implement the 
necessarily restructured program. The conferees directed that 
the plan should assume a constant level of funding in the base 
program for the next several years; as appropriate, it should 
be integrated with the plans of the international fusion 
program; and it should address the institutional makeup of a 
domestic program consistent with the funding assumptions.
    The Committee is impressed by the balanced plan developed 
with the assistance of the Fusion Energy Advisory Committee and 
is pleased that the Department has incorporated the 
recommendations of the plan into the program. As a result, the 
Committee has provided $240,000,000, as close to level funding 
as possible given budget constraints, for the fusion energy 
program. Such amount includes $6,720,000 for program direction, 
a 20-percent reduction of the $8,400,000 the Department 
proposed to fund for fusion energy-related program direction in 
other energy research program direction and $8,000,000 for 
fusion energy-related computing the Department had proposed to 
fund in other energy research computational and technology 
research. The recommendation includes the amount requested to 
continue the U.S. participation in the engineering design 
activities phase of the international thermonuclear 
experimental reactor [ITER] project, to which the United States 
is committed through fiscal year 1998.

                         basic energy sciences

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $791,661,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     653,675,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             649,675,000

    The Committee acknowledges the important and essential 
contributions of the Department in the Nation's basic science 
and research programs. The collaboration between the national 
laboratories and the university community has provided the 
foundation for scientific breakthroughs and achievements in 
energy-related research. To continue this progress, the 
Committee recommendation strongly supports the budget request 
to enhance the utilization of the Department's fundamental 
science and user facilities.
    The Committee recommendation includes $9,000,000 to 
continue the Department's Experimental Program to Stimulate 
Competitive Research [EPSCoR] Program. Also, the Midwest 
superconductivity consortium is continued at the current level.
    Energy bioscience program.--There exists a substantial need 
to discover and develop the appropriate technology to aid in 
environmental restoration initiatives. The Committee believes 
that more basic research must be conducted if the United States 
is to successfully surmount the numerous environmental cleanup 
and waste treatment challenges the Nation currently faces. The 
Committee notes the success the Division of Energy Biosciences 
has had in support of other energy-related fields, such as 
energy production, and is encouraged by current research 
initiatives involving bioremediation. Accordingly, the 
Committee has included the budget request for this program.
    Scientific users facility initiative.--The Committee 
commends the Department for its support of the scientific users 
facilities initiative which has substantially increased 
operating hours and funded state-of-the-art instrumentation at 
the Department's user facilities. The Committee has included 
the full amount of the request, $277,636,000, for the 
initiative.
    Spallation neutron source.--In the conference report 
accompanying the Fiscal Year 1996 Energy and Water Development 
Act, the conferees provided funds for research and development 
and conceptual design activities for a new spallation neutron 
source. The Committee also directed the Department to evaluate 
opportunities to upgrade existing reactors and spallation 
sources as cost-effective means of providing neutrons in the 
near term for the scientific community while the next 
generation source is developed.
    After reviewing the interim report of the Basic Energy 
Sciences Advisory Committee on this matter, which strongly 
recommended that the upgrades and construction projects under 
consideration not come at the expense of other research 
activities of the Office of Basic Energy Science, the Committee 
is concerned that upgrades may be the only affordable option 
for the foreseeable future. However, because of the investment 
already made in conceptual design, environmental impact 
studies, and preconstruction research and development, and 
because the Committee intends that a final decision on the next 
generation spallation source be made on the basis of complete 
information, the Committee has included $8,000,000, the same as 
the request, for those activities in fiscal year 1997. The 
results of those activities, and any recommendations concerning 
upgrades, should be included in the Department's fiscal year 
1998 budget request.

                     other energy research programs

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $63,256,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     231,182,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             213,763,000

    Other energy research programs such as energy research 
analyses, laboratory technology transfer, advisory and 
oversight, multiprogram energy laboratory support, and program 
direction are funded in this section.
    Technology transfer.--The Committee strongly supports 
technology transfer which facilitates technologies and 
capabilities developed at public expense to enter the 
marketplace to benefit the Nation. The Committee is willing to 
concur with the Department's request that technology transfer 
not be provided a separate appropriation with the understanding 
that the Department's commitment to technology transfer will 
continue and that programmatic funding will continue to support 
technology transfer at the current level, as was intended by 
the original legislation authorizing the Department's 
participation in technology transfer activities.
    Indian energy resource program.--The Committee recognizes 
the unique challenge of providing power to rural Alaska; many 
parts of which are not accessible by road and characterized by 
severe climate, poverty, and dispersed populations. The 
Committee is willing to undertake a significant effort to 
address these issues.
    The Committee recommendation for energy supply research and 
development includes $5,000,000 to fund and implement Indian 
energy resource programs authorized under section 2603 of the 
Energy Policy Act of 1992. Within this amount, the Committee 
directs that $1,000,000 be provided for the Haida Alaska Native 
Village Corp.'s Reynolds Creek hydroelectric project; 
$3,000,000 be provided for the Eyak Native Corp. Power Creek 
hydroelectric project in Cordova, AK; and $1,000,000 be 
provided for the Klawock-Thorne Bay-Kasaan electrical intertie 
on Prince of Wales Island, AK.
    Energy and environmental technologies.--The Committee 
recommendation for other energy research includes $10,000,000 
for the establishment of the energy and environmental 
technologies applications project at the University of 
Southwestern Louisiana. The project will enhance fundamental 
automation research in areas designed to improve the Nation's 
global competitiveness and energy efficiency. The project 
includes automation for energy and environmental 
responsibility, computer integrated manufacturing, intelligent 
material handling systems, advanced computer and communications 
technology and data dissemination systems. These funds will 
augment cost-sharing commitments from non-Federal sources, the 
State of Louisiana, and the University of Southwestern 
Louisiana.
    Computational chemistry.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $760,000 for computational chemistry and molecular 
modeling. The Committee supports the broad application of the 
capabilities at the computational chemistry center in 
combustion and energy technologies.
    Program direction.--The Committee has included $27,003,000 
for other energy research program direction which is 20 percent 
below the request once the request is reduced by $8,400,000. 
The $8,400,000 reduction results from the Committee's action to 
include funding for fusion energy-related program direction in 
the fusion energy account.

                       energy support activities

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $32,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     174,223,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             138,000,000

    University and science education.--Due to severe budget 
constraints, the Committee recommends the amount of $15,000,000 
for the university and science education programs. To increase 
flexibility, the Committee has merged funding for the 
laboratory cooperative science centers and for university 
programs.
    The Committee recommendation for university and science 
education includes $3,000,000 to support one Hispanic 
collaborative for research and education in science and 
technology consortium effort, with a Hispanic institution 
serving as the lead institution.
    Since 1981, the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, the Ana G. 
Mended University system, and Jackson State University have 
enjoyed a productive relationship intended to promote minority 
participation in the sciences and have enhanced computer 
science and scientific research at all three institutions. The 
Committee is encouraged by the success of this effort and 
directs the Department to continue the collaboration at the 
current year level.
    The Energy and Water Development Act for Fiscal Year 1996 
provided $500,000 to support the Nebraska math and science 
initiative in cooperation with the National Renewable Energy 
Laboratory as authorized by Public Law 104-46. The Committee is 
concerned that the Department did not follow the recommendation 
of the Committee in this regard. The Committee has again 
included $500,000 for this purpose.
    In-house energy management.--The Committee is strongly 
committed to reducing the Department's energy consumption. 
Those savings can and should be accomplished at no cost to the 
Department; energy service companies which contract to install 
energy saving devices in non-Federal buildings have 
demonstrated a willingness to make such installations and 
receive payment exclusively from the resultant energy cost 
savings.
    Despite the Committee's elimination of funding for in-house 
energy management in the Fiscal Year 1996 Energy and Water 
Development Act, the Department has continued some in-house 
energy management activities in fiscal year 1996. The 
Department justifies its continued activities on the grounds 
that the Department does not have the ability to procure energy 
savings devices and services like those provided to non-Federal 
entities by energy services companies. The Committee recognizes 
this problem. As a result, the Committee recommendation 
includes $1,000,000 to establish an in-house, centralized 
energy efficiency procurement and contracting expertise to 
assist the Department's procurement and contracting officers
    The Committee further recommends that, to the extent the 
Department has not already done so, the Department conform its 
procurement regulations to the procurement authorities provided 
by subsections (a) and (c) of section 546 of the National 
Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8256). These steps 
will enable the Department to become a leader within the 
Federal Government in the procurement of energy saving devices 
and services. The Committee strongly supports this needed 
reform.

             environmental restoration and waste management

                              (nondefense)

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $621,541,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     651,414,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             595,895,000

    The Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Program 
funds activities necessary to meet milestones and legal 
requirements included in compliance agreements, consent orders, 
and Federal and State statutes and regulations, and provides 
for implementation of all DOE orders and highest priority 
discretionary activities including those relating to reducing 
risk to the environment, safety, and health. The budget request 
is submitted under two appropriation accounts--``Energy supply, 
research, and development'' and the ``Defense environmental 
restoration and waste management'' accounts.
    Due to budget constraints, the Committee recommendation for 
nondefense environmental restoration and waste management is 
$595,895,000, a reduction of $25,646,000 from the amount 
provided in fiscal year 1996. Within that amount, the Committee 
has increased funding for waste management to $186,224,000, a 
$4,183,000 increase over the amount provided in fiscal year 
1996, to emphasize the Committee's commitment to reducing 
future environmental restoration costs.
    The recommendation includes funding to expedite the cleanup 
of the Wayne, NJ, interim storage site under the formerly 
utilized sites remedial action program [FUSRAP].
    From within available funds, the Committee recommendation 
is to continue the support of the University Research Program 
in Robotics at $3,500,000.
    Due to a limited competitive market and the extensive use 
by the Department of Defense, the Committee directs that the 
Department's national low-level radioactive waste management 
program shall conduct a study of the costs of operating a low-
level radioactive waste disposal facility such as the 
commercial low-level radioactive waste disposal facility at 
Barnwell, SC. This study is to ensure that the Department of 
Defense, the Veteran's Administration, and any other waste 
generators are paying equitable disposal fees.
    The Committee is aware that in 1975, a consortium formed by 
the Atomic Energy Commission and consisting of investor-owned 
utilities, General Electric, and the West German Government 
transferred ownership of the Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide 
Reactor [SEFOR] to the University of Arkansas. The university 
is now concerned by the significant cost it may face for the 
eventual decontamination and decommissioning of SEFOR. The 
Senate is considering legislation that would establish a 
decommissioning pilot program to decommission and decontaminate 
the SEFOR at the Department's expense. The Committee 
understands the project could cost from tens of millions of 
dollars to hundreds of millions of dollars.
    Because of the substantial cost that may be involved, the 
Committee strongly recommends the Department evaluate any legal 
obligation the Department may maintain regarding SEFOR and 
identify and evaluate any obligations that may exist from 
similar reactors or nuclear facilities which have transferred 
to non-Federal ownership. The Committee directs the Department 
to report its findings to the Committee within 180 days of 
enactment of this act.
    Formally utilized sites remedial action program.--The 
Committee realizes that St. Louis City and St. Louis County 
bear a substantial radioactive waste burden from cold war 
uranium refining operations in the 1940's and 1950's and also 
from the Manhattan project uranium operations. The waste 
continues to be moved and spread and there are more than 100 
properties contaminated above DOE's cleanup standards. In St. 
Louis there are more offsite contaminated properties above 
DOE's standards than at Rocky Flats, INEL, Los Alamos, and 
Sandia combined. The owners of the contaminated properties were 
not AEC or DOE contractors and did not cause the contamination.
    The Committee directs the DOE to cooperate with the 
citizens of St. Louis City and County in moving forward with a 
cost-effective cleanup of these sites. The Department is 
directed to report to the Committee on the proposed course of 
action the Department is pursuing no later than 90 days after 
enactment of this act.

                         recommendation summary

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

                Uranium Supply and Enrichment Activities

                          Gross Appropriation

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $89,900,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      87,266,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              59,466,000

                                Revenues

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $60,606,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      59,466,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              59,466,000

    The Uranium Supply and Enrichment Activities Program funds 
the Department's efforts in overseeing the Government's 
continuing interest in the operation of the gaseous diffusion 
plants managed by the United States Enrichment Corp. [USEC]; 
developing means for using or disposing of depleted uranium; 
monitoring Russian uranium processing facilities to ensure that 
low-enriched uranium being purchased by USEC is derived from 
Russian highly enriched uranium removed from dismantled nuclear 
weapons; transferring enrichment-related technologies to the 
private sector; and leading the Department's uranium 
revitalization efforts.
    The budget request for fiscal year 1997 includes a gross 
appropriation of $87,266,000. Once reductions are taken for 
revenues and use of prior-year balances, the Department 
requested a net appropriation of $27,800,000. Due to severe 
budget constraints, the Committee has provided a gross 
appropriation of $59,466,000 and a net appropriation of zero.

                        summary recommendations

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

      Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $278,807,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     240,200,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             220,200,000

    The uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning 
fund was established in accordance with title XI of Public Law 
102-486, the National Energy Policy Act of 1992. The funds 
provide for the environmental cleanup of the Department's 
uranium enrichment plants, two of which are currently leased to 
the USEC, and the cleanup of uranium mill tailings and thorium 
piles resulting from production and sales to the Federal 
Government for the Manhattan project and other national 
security purposes.
    Due to severe budget constraints, the Committee 
recommendation includes a reduction of $20,000,000 from the 
budget request of $240,200,000. The Committee recommends the 
entire reduction be taken from activities under title IX of 
Public Law 102-486.

                General Science and Research Activities

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $981,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................   1,009,150,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           1,000,626,000

    The general science and research activities programs are 
concerned with understanding the nature of matter and energy 
and the fundamental forces and particles of nature. The 
knowledge acquired in this basic research is an essential part 
of the intellectual foundation of other scientific disciplines 
and technical permits. Deeper understanding correspondingly 
contributes to all of the scientific disciplines and to our 
Nation's technological base. The general science and research 
activities programs are organized into two interrelated 
scientific programs, high-energy physics, and nuclear physics. 
These programs support basic research which is aimed to provide 
new knowledge which is expected to have long-term scientific 
and technological impacts on energy development and utilization 
and on other aspects of our society.
    The Department's general science and research support some 
of the most important research conducted by the Federal 
Government. As a result, the Committee has sought to minimize 
any reductions in these programs.
    High-energy physics.--The Committee recommendation for 
high-energy physics is $672,921,000, a $5,921,000 reduction 
from the amount provided in fiscal year 1996 and a $6,204,000 
reduction from the amount requested.
    The Committee encourages the Department to participate in 
international collaborations to increase access of U.S. 
researchers to world class research facilities. However, the 
Committee strongly cautions the Department that, due to budget 
constraints, it should anticipate, at best, current level 
funding for the high-energy physics program for the foreseeable 
future. Any funds committed to the LHC must be derived from the 
base high-energy physics budget.
    Nuclear physics.--The recommendation for nuclear energy 
physics is $318,425,000, a $13,925,000 increase over the amount 
provided in fiscal year 1996 and equal to the amount requested.

                        summary recommendations

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

                      Nuclear Waste Disposal Fund

    The Nuclear Waste Policy Act requires the Department to 
determine whether Yucca Mountain, NV, is a suitable site for 
the Nation's nuclear waste repository, and, if it is, to build 
the repository there. The repository is needed to dispose of 
84,000 metric tons of nuclear waste that is being produced at 
the Nation's 110 nuclear powerplants and thousands of 
additional tons of nuclear wastes produced by the Nation's 
national security programs. Since the Nuclear Waste Policy Act 
was passed in 1982, the Department has collected nearly 
$8,000,000,000 from the utilities and their ratepayers and has 
spent about $5,000,000,000 for this purpose.
    Funding for the nuclear waste program was cut sharply in 
fiscal year 1996. The program received only one-half the funds 
requested by the President and 40 percent less that in fiscal 
year 1995. The Department was directed to refocus its efforts 
on completing the core scientific activities needed to 
determine whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable and to 
complete a conceptual design for the repository waste package.
    The Committee recommends $400,028,000 for the program in 
fiscal year 1997. Of this amount, $200,028,000 is to be derived 
from the nuclear waste fund collected from the ratepayers, and 
$200,000,000 from the defense account. These funds are to be 
used to continue the existing scientific work at Yucca Mountain 
in order to determine the ultimate feasibility and 
licensibility of the permanent repository at Yucca Mountain. 
This work should proceed in accordance with the Civilian 
Radioactive Waste Management Draft Program plan issued by the 
Department in May 1996. No later than June 30, 1998, the 
Secretary shall provide to the President and to the Congress a 
viability assessment of the Yucca Mountain site. The viability 
assessment shall include: the preliminary design concept for 
the critical elements for the repository and waste package; a 
total system performance assessment, based upon the design 
concept and the scientific data and analysis available by June 
30, 1998, describing the probable behavior of the repository in 
the Yucca Mountain geological setting relative to the overall 
system performance standards; a plan and cost estimate for the 
remaining work required to complete a license application; and 
an estimate of the costs to construct and operate the 
repository in accordance with the design.
    The Environmental Protection Agency is now developing 
radiation protection standards that will determine whether the 
Yucca Mountain repository can be licensed to receive nuclear 
waste. While those standards should provide adequate protection 
of the health and safety of the public, they should not set 
dose limits or compliance periods at arbitrary and unrealistic 
levels that require a degree of proof that science is unable to 
provide. The standards should reflect the scientific 
uncertainty inherent in human and geophysical behavior 
thousands of years in the future. The standards should be used 
to determine whether deep geologic disposal at Yucca Mountain 
provides adequate protection of the public compared to other 
management options. They should not be designed to defeat the 
Nation's considered policy of deep geologic disposal by 
requiring a degree of proof that science cannot provide.
    Any radiation protection standard proposed by the 
Environmental Protection Agency for the Yucca Mountain 
repository should consider specific alternatives to deep 
geologic disposal at Yucca Mountain and should include an 
analysis of the comparative risk to the public from each 
alternative. The alternatives considered should include the 
permanent storage of nuclear waste at the sites where it is now 
stored and one or more centralized storage sites recommended by 
the administration for the above-ground, managed storage. The 
Agency should evaluate each of these alternatives against the 
standards proposed for deep geologic disposal at Yucca 
Mountain.

                    Atomic Energy Defense Activities

    The atomic energy defense activities programs of the 
Department of Energy are divided into four separate 
appropriation accounts: weapons activities; defense 
environmental restoration and waste management; other defense 
programs; and defense nuclear waste disposal. Descriptions of 
each of these accounts are provided below.

                           Weapons Activities

Appropriations, 1996....................................  $3,460,314,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................   3,710,002,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           3,978,602,000

    Weapons activities support the Nation's national security 
mission of nuclear deterrence by preserving nuclear weapons 
technology and competence in the laboratories and maintaining 
the reliability and safety of the weapons in the enduring 
nuclear stockpile. The United States continues to retain 
strategic nuclear forces sufficient to deter future hostile 
countries from seeking a nuclear advantage. In the past, 
confidence in the nuclear weapons stockpile was assured through 
a combination of underground nuclear and laboratory testing. 
Since October 1992, the United States has maintained a 
moratorium on underground nuclear testing and has explored 
other means to assure confidence in the safety, reliability, 
and performance of nuclear weapons.
    The mission of defense programs is to maintain the safety, 
security, and reliability of the Nation's enduring nuclear 
weapons stockpile within the constraints of a comprehensive 
test ban, utilizing a science-based approach to stockpile 
stewardship and management in a smaller, more efficient weapons 
complex infrastructure. The future weapons complex will rely on 
scientific understanding and expert judgment, rather than on 
underground nuclear testing and the development of new weapons, 
to predict, identify, and correct problems affecting the safety 
and reliability of the stockpile. Enhanced experimental 
capabilities and new tools in computation, surveillance, and 
advanced manufacturing will become necessary to recertify 
weapon safety, performance, and reliability without underground 
nuclear testing. Weapons will be maintained, modified, or 
retired and dismantled as needed to meet arms control 
objectives or remediate potential safety and reliability 
issues. As new tools are developed and validated, they will be 
incorporated into a smaller, more flexible and agile weapons 
complex infrastructure for the future.
    The Stockpile Stewardship and Management Program is a 
single, highly integrated technical program for maintaining the 
safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile in an era 
without underground nuclear testing and without new nuclear 
weapons development and production. Traditionally, the 
activities of the three weapons laboratories and the Nevada 
test site have been regarded separately from those of the 
weapons production plants. However, although there remain 
separate budget items within defense programs, all stockpile 
stewardship and management activities have achieved a new, 
closer linkage to each other.
    There are three primary goals of the Stockpile Stewardship 
and Management Program: (1) provide high confidence in the 
safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. stockpile to 
ensure the continuing effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear 
deterrent while simultaneously supporting U.S. arms control and 
nonproliferation policy; (2) provide a small, affordable, and 
effective production complex to provide component and weapon 
replacements when needed, including limited lifetime components 
and tritium; and (3) provide the ability to reconstitute U.S. 
nuclear testing and weapon production capacities, consistent 
with Presidential directives and the ``Nuclear Posture 
Review,'' should national security so demand in the future.
    The Committee continues to view laboratory directed 
research and development [LDRD] as an integral, essential 
component of the Department's ability to respond to changing 
needs and requirements, and maintaining the preeminence of the 
national laboratories in the areas of science and engineering. 
The Committee directs DOE to continue current guidelines for 
managing laboratory directed research and development.
    The Committee's recommendation for weapons activities is 
$3,976,102,000, an increase of $266,100,000 over the budget 
request. Details of the recommended funding levels follow.

                         stockpile stewardship

    An appropriation of $1,659,267,000 is recommended for the 
stockpile stewardship activities of the Department of Energy.
    The stockpile stewardship program addresses issues of 
maintaining confidence in weapons stockpile safety and 
reliability without underground nuclear testing through a 
technically challenging science-based stockpile stewardship 
program utilizing upgraded or new experimental and 
computational capabilities.
    Core stockpile stewardship.--The Core Stockpile Stewardship 
Program provides the physical, technical, and intellectual 
infrastructure necessary to support a reliable, safe, and 
secure nuclear weapons stockpile. The Committee has recommended 
a total of $1,230,907,000 for core stockpile stewardship 
programs. This is $80,000,000 more than the budget request.
    The Committee is concerned that the funding level proposed 
for fiscal year 1997 and future budget planning projections of 
the Department of Energy may not be sufficient to address the 
critical needs of an aging stockpile. The Committee believes 
that preservation of core intellectual, scientific, and 
technical competencies and the continued ability of the weapons 
complex to respond to changing world situations is critically 
important. The Department is to be commended on the progress 
made over the past year in continuing to focus on stockpile 
stewardship activities.
    An additional $20,000,000 is recommended for enhanced 
surveillance. Enhanced surveillance is an integrated program 
among the nuclear weapons laboratories and the production 
plants to develop modern technologies for detecting and 
predicting defects in nuclear weapons and their components that 
will arise from the longer lifetimes required of the enduring 
stockpile. The additional funding will provide for research and 
development in chemistry and materials; engineering and design 
assessment for aged or replaced weapons; characterization of 
device components; and modeling and simulation of aging-induced 
changes among other activities.
    An increase of $40,000,000 is included for the accelerated 
strategic computing initiative [ASCI], including additional 
high end hardware development. The additional funding will 
allow increased cooperative activities with universities on new 
theory and computer models for key weapon physics, additional 
simulation code development, and common programming 
environment. An increase of $10,000,000 is provided for 
simulation and computer models to better understand primary and 
secondary sequences such as implosion or boost.
    The Committee has included an additional $10,000,000 for 
advanced manufacturing and infrastructure activities to develop 
and evaluate technologies and processes to meet present and 
future stockpile needs. Funding provided in this area allows 
DOE to explore such things as agile manufacturing and 
enterprise integration for optimization of the complex's 
responsiveness; and advanced laser cutting, drilling, and 
machining techniques for materials and production processes 
that lead to cleaner, cheaper, and higher quality component 
manufacturing.
    Los Alamos Neutron Science Center [LANSCE].--The Committee 
has provided $34,160,000 for the Los Alamos Neutron Science 
Center [LANSCE]. The LANSCE facility provides a new source of 
critical data in the detection of small defects which might 
serve as indicators of weapons component aging and the 
prediction of material performance. It is, therefore, an 
essential element in the Department's science-based stockpile 
stewardship program.
    Testing capabilities and readiness.--An appropriation of 
$162,525,000 is recommended for testing capabilities and 
readiness activities. Current Presidential direction is to 
maintain a readiness capability to conduct an underground 
nuclear test at the Nevada test site. Therefore, infrastructure 
and other measures are to be maintained to support this 
requirement. Presidential direction also indicates that 
resources should be included that are necessary to conduct 
experimental activities planned by the nuclear weapons design 
laboratories and appropriate to the national nuclear testing 
policy.
    Construction projects.--An appropriation of $88,337,000 is 
recommended for construction projects under core stockpile 
stewardship activities for fiscal year 1997. This is the same 
as the budget request.
    Inertial confinement fusion [ICF].--An appropriation of 
$366,460,000 is recommended for the Inertial Confinement Fusion 
Program. The ICF Program continues to be a major contributor to 
the science and technology base supporting the nuclear 
deterrent through improved understanding of the underlying 
physics of nuclear weapons and computational modeling that will 
provide the future basis for ensuring safety, reliability, and 
performance on nuclear components.
    The Committee recommendation supports the cooperative 
agreement between DOE and the University of Rochester's 
Laboratory of Laser Energetics.
    Project 96-D-111, national ignition facility [NIF].--The 
NIF is a key facility in maintaining nuclear weapons science 
expertise required for the stockpile stewardship program, and 
to supporting weapons effects testing. An appropriation of 
$131,900,000 is recommended for the NIF project, which is the 
same as the budget request. The funding will enable DOE to 
undertake title II final detailed design and preconstruction, 
site specific preparation activities.
    Technology transfer and education.--The technology transfer 
and education program directly supports core competencies 
through the development of technologies and intellectual 
capabilities to meet current and future defense mission needs.
    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $61,900,000 
for these activities for fiscal year 1997 to support existing 
cooperative research and development agreements and education 
activities.

                          stockpile management

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,969,831,000 
for stockpile management activities.
    The stockpile management mission is to provide for 
maintenance, evaluation, dismantlement, transportation, and 
disposal of nuclear weapons in accordance with quality, 
quantity, and schedule requirements approved by the President 
in the nuclear weapons stockpile plan. The program addresses 
issues of near-term and long-range support for the enduring 
stockpile, and for ensuring an adequate supply of tritium. 
Along with routine stockpile surveillance, this includes 
corrective maintenance and system replacement, as well as 
weapon dismantlement. The goal is to support the national 
security of the United States by maintaining a safe and 
reliable nuclear deterrent.
    The Committee has provided an additional $15,000,000 over 
the budget request for integrated enhanced surveillance 
activities at the four production plants to assess the 
reliability and safety of the weapons stockpile.
    An additional $100,000,000 is recommended for the 
manufacturing and infrastructure needs of the weapon production 
plants. It is critical that the evaluation, surveillance, 
maintenance, repair, and dismantlement capabilities in the 
production complex be maintained; along with improving the 
manufacturing technologies needed to support the stockpile. In 
addition, these funds are intended to address aging processing 
equipment, information system upgrades, and funding deficits 
for ongoing production activities. The Committee expects that 
the additional funding will be allocated equitably across the 
productions plants and with recognition that the weapons 
laboratories must be involved in this effort.
    The Committee recommendation includes $6,000,000 in 
operating funds for the Department to undertake upgrades to the 
existing tritium recycling facility.
    Tritium source.--An appropriation of $150,000,000 is 
recommended for activities related to providing a new tritium 
source. Tritium is a key element used in nuclear weapons which 
must be replaced periodically in order for the weapon to 
operate as designed. Currently, there is no capability to 
produce tritium and, therefore, it is essential that activities 
related to providing a new source of tritium proceed as quickly 
as possible and requirements dictate. The Committee continues 
to support the dual-track program being developed by the 
Department.
    The Committee understands that the Department has 
identified additional requirements, above those included in the 
fiscal year 1997 budget request, based on a review by the 
Tritium Executive Committee. Therefore, the Committee has 
recommended an additional $40,000,000 for accelerator 
production technology and $10,000,000 for light water reactor-
related activities. The Committee directs that the activities 
related to the light water reactor be strictly limited to out-
of-reactor work. The Committee expects the Department to assure 
that the new tritium source will not in any way jeopardize the 
schedule for providing tritium in the necessary timeframe, and 
that the operational regime does not compromise the ability of 
the Department of Energy to meet the tritium requirements of 
the Department of Defense.
    Construction projects.--An appropriation of $94,361000 is 
recommended for line item construction projects under core 
stockpile management for fiscal year 1997. This is the same as 
the budget request.

                           program direction

    An appropriation of $349,504,000 is recommended for program 
direction activities. The Committee recommendation provides 
$22,600,000 for the community assistance program at Los Alamos.
    The Committee is aware that the Depart of Energy, pursuant 
to the National Defense Authorization Act of 1996, has 
recommended that the historically paid annual assistance to the 
incorporated county of Los Alamos should not continue 
indefinitely and that termination of financial assistance to 
the county could best be accomplished by a final settlement, 
the transfer to the county of installations and functions owned 
and operated by the Federal Government and the transfer to the 
county of certain undeveloped land. The Committee further 
understands that DOE does not believe that any extension of 
authorities under the Community Act are required to implement 
the proposed recommendation.
    Therefore, the Committee has included $22,600,000 for DOE 
to carry out the recommendations for final settlement payment, 
and directs the Department to carry out the recommendations as 
set forth in the report to Congress concerning assistance 
payments for the incorporated county of Los Alamos, NM, dated 
June 1996.
    The Committee notes that the fiscal year 1997 assistance 
payments to the School Board of Los Alamos, NM, under its 
existing contract with the Department shall be the last such 
payment under the Atomic Energy Communities Act of 1955 (42 
U.S.C. 2391); and beginning in fiscal year 1998, the School 
Board of Los Alamos is eligible for payments in lieu of taxes 
under section 168 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 
2088) and other assistance as necessary under existing 
authority of the Department.

                        recommendation summaries

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

         Defense Environmental Restoration and Waste Management

Appropriations, 1996....................................  $5,557,532,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................   5,409,310,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           5,615,210,000

    The Department's environmental management program is 
responsible for identifying and reducing health and safety 
risks, and managing waste at sites where the Department carried 
out nuclear energy or weapons research and production 
activities which resulted in radioactive, hazardous, and mixed 
waste contamination. The environmental management program goals 
are to eliminate and manage the urgent risk in the system; 
emphasize health and safety for workers and the public; 
establish a system that increases managerial and financial 
control; and establish a stronger partnership between DOE and 
its stakeholders. Environmental management activities of the 
Department of Energy are budgeted under three appropriation 
accounts: defense environmental restoration and waste 
management; energy supply, research, and development; and the 
uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund.
    This ``Defense environmental restoration and waste 
management'' account includes waste management functions, 
environmental restoration activities, science and technology 
activities, nuclear materials and facilities stabilization 
functions, and a variety of other crosscutting and program 
support activities, such as policy and management, analysis, 
education and risk management, and a new privatization 
initiative.
    The recommended funding for defense environmental 
restoration and waste management is $5,615,210,000, an increase 
of $205,900,000 over the budget request.
    The Committee believes that the environmental management 
program of the Department of Energy is at a critical juncture. 
The trend of large budget increases has been reversed, and for 
the first time in several years the budget request for fiscal 
year 1997 is below the enacted amount for 1996. However, the 
Committee feels that additional funding is warranted and that 
it is critical to future program success to have a stable and 
predictable stream of funding. Large swings in appropriations 
can cause waste and inefficiencies if too high; and conversely 
if too low, result in unacceptable response to critical 
problems and requirements. The Committee believes that the 
program recommended for fiscal year 1997 is within the 
acceptable range and will meet all legal requirements and other 
agreements.
    Budget constraints will continue to check future increases 
and additional efficiencies will be required. However, even 
with these constraints, tremendous progress has been made both 
in tangible, on-the-ground results and in the business 
practices within the program. The Committee expects the 
Department to continue to seek every opportunity to bring about 
more efficiencies and tough businesslike approaches to program 
execution, including reductions in headquarters staffing. The 
Department should critically review the need and requirement 
for each individual support service contract, duplicative and 
overlapping organizational arrangements, and employees 
performing functions which duplicate other headquarters 
functions.
    While it is imperative that the Department's cleanup costs 
be brought down, there are instances where relative small 
amounts of additional funding invested in the near-term offer 
the potential for significant reductions in long-term budgetary 
requirements. The Committee continues to be concerned with 
growing landlord costs required to maintaining buildings and 
facilities that are ready for demolition, and the high costs 
associated with temporarily storing and monitoring wastes that 
are ready for permanent disposal. In order to reduce these 
costs in the future, it is important that the Department 
expedite demolition work, waste shipments, and permanent 
storage whenever possible. Therefore, in prioritizing spending 
for environmental management work, the Secretary should 
continue to give special attention to those sites or portions 
of sites where increased near-term funding for actual physical 
remediation work and permanent waste disposal can save 
substantial future dollars.

                       environmental restoration

    An appropriation of $1,777,194,000 is recommended for 
environmental restoration programs, an increase of $15,000,000 
over the budget request for fiscal year 1997. The Environmental 
Restoration Program conducts cleanup activities to stabilize 
radioactive waste, carries out remediation efforts, and 
performs decommissioning and decontamination work at 
contaminated DOE sites. Other activities include performing 
assessments and characterizations to determine potential 
radioactive and hazardous waste releases and to reduce and 
remove the potential risks to the environment, human health, 
and safety resulting from past defense-related Department 
activities.
    The Committee has provided an additional $15,000,000 for 
the Department to undertake accelerate efforts to reduce 
growing landlord costs as discussed earlier in this report, and 
to address high priority removal and remedial actions. The 
Committee directs that increased funding be applied to those 
sites where remediation occurs. The Committee recommendation 
would provide resources to sites such as Savannah River, 
Hanford, Rocky Flats, and Oak Ridge where additional resources 
can be used to significantly reduce life cycle costs.

                            waste management

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,675,053,000 
for the Waste Management Program. This is $138,400,000 over the 
budget request. The Waste Management Program seeks to protect 
the public and workers by seeking to minimize, treat, store, 
and dispose of radioactive, hazardous, mixed, and sanitary 
waste generated by past and ongoing operations at DOE 
facilities.
    The Committee is concerned with the approach taken by DOE 
in development of the fiscal year 1997 budget request for waste 
management activities, specifically the reductions required in 
ongoing program activities such as reducing large mortgages, 
safety and compliance monitoring, cleanup of surface 
contamination, and tank monitoring upgrades and maintenance at 
Hanford tank farms, in order to undertake DOE's new 
environmental management privatization initiative.
    The Committee recommendation provides significant 
additional resources to continue critical ongoing activities in 
an effort to mitigate the impact of proposed budget reductions 
for fiscal year 1997. Stable and predictable funding levels for 
ongoing cleanup work are essential in order to sustain the 
excellent progress being made. The Committee action seeks to 
support the privatization initiative while adding significant 
resources to mitigate the impact on waste management 
activities.
    The Department is directed to accelerate defense waste 
processing facility [DWPF] operations and associated high-level 
waste treatment. The Committee understands that the facility 
was only recently activated and that additional operating 
funding may be warranted. The DWPF is critical to the 
credibility and success of DOE's Waste Management Program.
    Review and comment by State of Oregon at Hanford.--The 
Committee understands that language was included by the Senate 
in the Department of Defense authorization bill (S. 1745, title 
XXXI, subtitle D, secs. 3161-3162) which gives the State of 
Oregon an opportunity to review and comment on certain remedial 
actions at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the State of 
Washington. While the amendment would enhance the information 
available to the State of Oregon in the decisionmaking process 
at Hanford, it will not slow cleanup of the site and will not 
give Oregon the right to participate in Tri-Party Agreement 
negotiations. Because of Hanford's location on the Columbia 
River and the effects of past radiation releases on the State 
of Oregon, the Committee recognizes the State's desire to 
participate in future decisions made about cleanup at the site. 
The Department of Energy is encouraged to fully comply with the 
direction contained in the Defense authorization bill.
    Construction projects.--An amount of $88,327,000 is 
provided for waste management construction activities for 
fiscal year 1997. This is the same as the budget request.

             nuclear materials and facilities stabilization

    The Committee recommendation for nuclear material and 
facility stabilization is $1,333,290,000, an increase of 
$429,469,000 over the budget request. The Nuclear Material and 
Facility Stabilization Program reflects the change in the 
Department's mission from production of nuclear weapons to the 
cleanup of the former production complex. The activities of 
this program reduce the level of potential risk to people and 
the environment and drive down the cost of maintaining surplus 
facilities. Nuclear material and facility stabilization 
activities that reduce risk include stabilizing nuclear 
materials and deactivating surplus production facilities. As 
stabilization and deactivation work is completed, the cost of 
implementing other environmental management activities should 
decrease.
    The recommendation includes an increase of $100,000,000 for 
nuclear material and facility stabilization activities, such as 
acceleration of Hanford deactivation and mortgage reduction 
activities associated with Hanford's plutonium finishing plant, 
B plant, and the 300 area fuel supply shut down nuclear 
materials stabilization and site operations at Savannah River F 
and H Canyons; augmented facility decontamination and 
stabilization activities; and increased emphasis in support of 
spent nuclear fuels movements and efforts to resolve spent 
nuclear fuel vulnerabilities.
    The Committee is aware that the Idaho National Engineering 
Laboratory has been designated the lead lab under DOE's 
National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program and that the Department has 
acknowledged that increased funding will be needed to carry out 
the additional responsibilities. The Committee recommendation 
is consistent with the Senate authorizing committee action for 
this activity.
    Site operations office.--The Committee has not adopted the 
proposal included in the budget request to create a new office 
of site operations as a separate budget function. The Committee 
is concerned that the Department is unnecessarily reducing its 
management flexibility by creating this new budget category. 
Committee action moves all funding and construction projects 
back under nuclear material and facility stabilization as in 
past years. The budget request totaling $324,969,000 has also 
been transferred back into that account.

                         technology development

    The Committee recommendation for technology development 
activities is $303,771,000, the same as the budget request.
    The mission of the Office of Technology Development is to 
develop new technologies or improve existing technologies that 
reduce risks and the cost of cleanup at the Department's 
facilities and contaminated areas. The Committee again states 
its belief that advanced technology development is key to a 
successful restoration and waste management program, and to 
significantly reducing costs.
    There is continued concern that the Department's efforts to 
develop appropriate and effective technologies to facilitate 
the cleanup are meeting with limited success. The Committee is 
seriously concerned with the Department's reluctance to fully 
integrate Office of Energy Research expertise and capabilities 
into the technology development effort to address mid- and 
long-term environmental management needs. The Secretary is 
urged to address this problem and take appropriate action to 
ensure energy research capabilities are more fully utilized. 
The Committee believes that strengthened ties between 
environmental management and the Office of Energy Research can 
only enhance the ability to the Department to succeed in its 
complex cleanup effort.
    The Committee understands that chemical decontamination 
technology could have the potential to accelerate waste cleanup 
work at nuclear production facilities and to reduce the costs 
and risks to the environment. The Committee encourages the 
Department to explore and demonstrate this new technology if 
appropriate.
    The Department has a large stockpile (550M kg) of depleted 
uranium, a byproduct of the uranium enrichment process. The 
Committee is advised that using innovative technology, depleted 
uranium can be recycled into environmentally stable uranium 
compounds and commercial products: anhydrous hydrogen fluoride 
[HF], which is used in uranium processing and in the 
manufacture of nonchlorofluorcarbon refrigerants; and depleted 
uranium oxides (UO2) and metals, which can be used to 
fashion radiation shielding, waste containers, counterweights, 
flywheels, and other devices requiring dense materials.
    The Committee understands the Department is interested in 
producing a stable uranium oxide that could be reused. It has 
identified a potential use for UO2 in the manufacturing of 
ducrete, a concrete-like material that could serve as a 
multipurpose cask to store and transport radioactive waste. 
Ducrete is a highly efficient shield with the capacity of steel 
and the relatively inexpensive construction cost of poured 
concrete. Although high quality UO2 has been manufactured 
from depleted uranium, the process needs refinement to recycle 
applications such as shielding and containers. Upon the 
Department's approval, funds appropriated herein may be used 
for this purpose.

                         Policy and Management

    The Committee recommendation provides an appropriation of 
$33,155,000 for policy and management activities. The reduction 
recommended reflects Committee concern that many activities 
funded under this account are duplicative of activities 
elsewhere in the Department and the need to concentrate 
available funding on cleanup work.

                     Environmental Science Program

    A total of $62,136,000, an increase of $10,000,000 over the 
budget request, is provided for the Environmental Science 
Program. The goal of this program is to strengthen the 
Department's environmental management basic science activities 
through a competitive process between DOE's national 
laboratories, academic, and industrial organizations. This 
program was initiated by Congress in fiscal year 1996 in 
response to the Galvin Commission report.
    As stated under technology development, the Committee is 
concerned about the Department's efforts to integrate basic 
science research of the Office of Energy Research and the 
activities of the Office of Technology Development. The 
Committee strongly urges the Secretary of Energy to ensure that 
the Office of Energy Research have full management 
responsibility over the funding provided herein.

                 Environmental Management Privatization

    An appropriation of $150,000,000 is recommended for the 
environmental management privatization initiative. The 
Committee action is taken without prejudice. The Committee 
supports Department's efforts to explore innovative options to 
reduce environmental management costs, but is concerned that 
response to DOE's recent bid solicitation raises serious 
questions regarding the Department's current approach to 
privatization. The Committee directs the Department to report 
to the Committee no later than December 31, 1996, on the impact 
recent interest in DOE's privatization proposal will have on 
projected cost savings, the extent of commercial competition 
and participation in the initiative, and recommendations on any 
changes, or new approaches which would make this initiative 
more effective.

                           Program Direction

    The Committee recommendation for program direction totals 
$439,011,000. Program direction provides the overall direction 
and administrative support for the environmental management 
programs of the Department of Energy.

                        Fixed Asset Acquisition

    The Committee has included $182,000,000, the full amount 
requested in the budget, for the Department of Energy to 
establish a new asset acquisition and privatization program. 
The Committee understands that program seeks to bring 
commercial practices and expertise into the DOE cleanup 
process. The Committee endorses this initiative and the 
activities proposed in the request, including the advanced 
mixed waste treatment facility at the Idaho National 
Engineering Laboratory. This facility demonstrates the Federal 
commitment to prepare waste for final disposition.

                        recommendation summaries

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

                        Other Defense Activities

Appropriations, 1996....................................  $1,388,212,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................   1,547,700,000

Committee recommendation

                                                           1,606,833,000

    An appropriation of $1,606,833,000 is recommended by the 
Committee for other defense activities.
    This account includes the following programs: verification 
and control technology, nuclear safeguards and security, 
security investigations, security evaluations, the Office of 
Nuclear Safety, Worker, and Community Transition Assistance, 
fissile materials control and disposition, emergency 
management, international nuclear safety and security 
activities, and naval reactors. Descriptions of each account 
are provided below.

                 Nonproliferation and National Security

    Verification and control technology.--The Verification and 
Control Technology Program includes activities related to 
nonproliferation and verification research and development, 
arms control, and intelligence. The Department is engaged in an 
active nuclear nonproliferation program through research and 
development activities performed at the national laboratories, 
by providing technical and analytical support to treaty 
development and implementation, and by providing intelligence 
support to these efforts. The Committee recommendation totals 
$470,248,000.
    The Committee recommendation for verification and control 
technology research and development includes an increase of 
$10,000,000 for DOE to undertake a cooperative technology 
effort on the verifiable dismantlement and conversion of 
plutonium from former Soviet Union weapons. This effort will 
use new ARIES technology to verifiably transform weapons grade 
plutonium removed from Russian weapons into plutonium oxide or 
hydride which is unsuitable for weapons use.
    In addition, the Committee has provided $17,000,000 to the 
Department to undertake a research and development program to 
address the technical means for detecting the presence, 
transportation, production, and use of materials to make 
biological and chemical weapons. The national laboratories have 
long been involved in the detection of potential nuclear 
threats, and this program will focus the capabilities which 
exists in the national laboratories on the chemical and 
biological threat.
    Arms control.--The arms control program supports the 
development and implementation of U.S. and international 
policies aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and 
other weapons of mass destruction. It also promotes effective 
international safeguards and physical protection of nuclear 
materials and control of the export of nuclear-related 
equipment, technologies, and materials.
    The Committee recommendation includes $214,144,000 for arms 
control activities. The recommendation provides an additional 
$30,000,000, consistent with Senate action on the Defense 
authorization bill, for material protection, control, and 
accounting [MPC&A] activities, including assistance to secure 
from theft or unauthorized diversion special nuclear materials 
in the former Soviet Union; and additional funding to support 
cooperation under laboratory-to-laboratory agreements along 
with government-to-government activities with the former Soviet 
Union to improve security of highly enriched uranium used for 
propulsion of Russian naval vessels. The Committee is aware 
that highly enriched uranium intended for naval propulsion can 
be used in nuclear weapons. To date, MPC&A efforts have focused 
on the nuclear weapons materials problem. Funding is included 
to expand DOE activities to secure nuclear materials used in 
naval propulsion.
    A total of $7,900,000 is included for the Department of 
Energy to complete the canning of spent fuel rods in North 
Korea, pursuant to the agreed framework, and to initiate 
postcanning technology activities.
    Intelligence.--The Office of Intelligence provides 
information and technical analyses on international arms 
proliferation, foreign nuclear programs, and other energy-
related matters to policymakers in the Department and other 
U.S. Government agencies. The focus of the Department's 
intelligence analysis and reporting is on emerging proliferant 
nations, nuclear technology transfers, foreign nuclear 
materials production, and proliferation implications of the 
breakup of the former Soviet Union. The Committee is aware of 
concerns expressed by GAO, the Senate Intelligence Committee, 
and senior DOE officials of the increased threat posed by 
foreign visitors visiting U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories. 
Increased openness at the weapons laboratories creates an 
inviting target for foreign countries seeking to obtain nuclear 
weapons-related information. Based on these concerns, the 
Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 to expand 
counterintelligence activities at the nuclear weapons 
laboratories and other high-risk facilities. The Committee 
recommendation also supports expanded analysis of the Russian 
and Chinese nuclear weapons programs.
    Emergency management.--The Committee has provided the full 
budget request of $16,794,000 for emergency management 
activities, which includes a $1,600,000 hazardous material 
spill facility. The Office of Emergency Management serves as 
the single point of contact and control for all DOE emergency 
and threat assessment-related activities, and ensures an 
integrated response to emergencies affecting the departmental 
operations and activities or requiring departmental assistance.
    Nuclear safeguards and security.--This program includes 
activities to assure adequate protection of nuclear weapons, 
nuclear materials, facilities, and classified information 
against theft, sabotage, espionage, and terrorist activities. 
As departmental sites and facilities are decommissioned, 
safeguards and security costs are expected to decrease 
Departmentwide. The Committee concurs with the budget request 
of $47,208,000.
    Security investigations.--This program includes those 
activities necessary for granting appropriate security 
clearances to agency and Government contractor personnel who 
must in the performance of their work have access to restricted 
data, national security information, or special nuclear 
material, or who occupy a designated critical sensitive 
position.
    An appropriation of $20,000,000 is recommended by the 
Committee. This is a reduction of $2,000,000 from the budget 
request and reflects continuing large uncosted balances in this 
account.

               Environment, Safety, and Health (Defense)

    The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health is the 
departmental resource that provides oversight in the areas of 
environment, safety, health, and safeguards and security 
performance. The Committee recommends an appropriation of 
$63,800,000, which is the same as the budget request for fiscal 
year 1997. Included in the Committee recommendation is 
$6,800,000 to continue the Marshall Island studies, funding to 
support commitments under State health agreements, continued 
epidemiologic studies conducted under the memorandum of 
understanding with the Department of Health and Human Services, 
and the Hanford thyroid study.
    The Committee urges the Department to continue the 
biological diversity inventory and analysis at the Hanford site 
and to provide adequate funds to undertake the work anticipated 
to be accomplished in fiscal year 1997. Also, the Committee 
understands that the delivery of public occupational health 
services is an important function at Hanford. The Committee 
urges the Department to seek such services from contractors 
that have experience and expertise providing onsite medical 
surveillance services.
    The Committee recommends the Department continue the long-
term health study of plutonium workers exposed in 1944-45. 
Eight of the original 26 participants in the study are still 
alive and are due for a 5-year examination in 1996 or 1997. The 
ongoing study has produced the longest record of dosimetry data 
of plutonium exposed workers and should be considered a high 
priority.

               WORKER AND COMMUNITY TRANSITION ASSISTANCE

    In accordance with section 3161 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act of 1993 and as a result of a change in the 
work force at defense nuclear facilities, defense employees of 
the Department may be provided various options to minimize 
impacts of these work force structure changes. These options 
include retraining, early retirement incentives, preference in 
hiring, outplacement assistance, and relocation assistance. In 
addition, this program funds contractor employment reduction 
requirements for severance and separation payments. The 
Committee recommendation is $67,000,000, the same as the budget 
request.

               FISSILE MATERIALS CONTROL AND DISPOSITION

    The Fissile Materials Control and Disposition Program is 
responsible for the technical and management activities to 
assess, plan, and direct efforts to provide for the safe, 
secure, environmentally sound long-term storage of all weapons-
usable fissile materials and the disposition of fissile 
materials declared surplus to national defense needs. The 
Committee recommendation is $93,796,000, the same as the budget 
request. This includes $17,000,000 for project 97-D-140, the 
Consolidated Special Nuclear Materials Storage Plant.

                 International Nuclear Safety (Defense)

    An appropriation of $72,200,000 is recommended by the 
Committee for international nuclear safety and nuclear security 
programs of DOE.
    The collapse of the former Soviet Union left many Russian 
nuclear reactors without the technical and financial support 
necessary to operate safely. Since 1992, the Department of 
Energy has undertaken efforts to develop a nuclear safety 
infrastructure and establish a safety culture at powerplants in 
the former Soviet Union and other central and Eastern European 
countries. The immediate effort is to support the conversion of 
the current reactor cores to nonweapons-grade plutonium 
producing cores. Other activities are designed to alleviate 
proliferation concerns related to the use of nuclear reactors 
by nations of the former Soviet Union.

                             NAVAL REACTORS

    The Naval Reactors Program provides for the design, 
development, testing, and evaluation of improved naval nuclear 
propulsion plants and reactor cores having long fuel life, high 
reliability, improved performances, and simplified operating 
and maintenance requirements. The nuclear propulsion plants and 
cores cover a wide range of configurations and power ratings 
suitable for installation in naval combatants varying in size 
from small submarines to large surface ships. The Committee 
recommendation is $663,932,000, the same as the budget request.

                        RECOMMENDATION SUMMARIES

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

                     Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $248,400,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     200,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             200,000,000

    The Committee recommends $200,000,000 for defense nuclear 
waste disposal.
    Since passage of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as 
amended, the nuclear waste fund has incurred costs for 
activities related to disposal of high-level waste generated 
from the atomic energy defense activities of the Department of 
Energy. At the end of fiscal year 1994, the balance owed by the 
Federal Government to the nuclear waste fund was $1,098,000,000 
(including principal and interest). The ``Defense nuclear waste 
disposal'' appropriation was established to ensure payment of 
the Federal Government's contribution to the nuclear waste 
fund.

                      Departmental Administration

                           net appropriations

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $244,391,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     119,475,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              92,629,000

                         miscellaneous revenues

Appropriation, 1996.....................................    $122,306,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     125,388,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             125,388,000

    The funding recommended for departmental administration 
provides for general management and program support functions 
benefiting all elements of the Department of Energy. The 
account funds a wide array of activities not directly 
associated with program execution such as: salaries, travel, 
and other costs associated with the management and support of 
the Department; development and analysis of energy policy 
proposals, legislation, and evaluation of programs; 
coordination of policies and programs for communicating with 
the news media and the general public; support for training and 
education programs; development of international energy policy 
and international cooperation in energy matters; performance of 
work for non-Federal entities; and revenues from the sale of 
products and services and their related costs.
    As stated earlier in the report, the Committee is concerned 
that the Department is failing to define and accomplish 
strategic objectives and has instead devoted its attention to 
process issues. This is a general shortcoming of the 
Department's administration which has become cumbersome and 
lost its focus.
    As a result, the Committee recommendation includes a gross 
appropriation for departmental administration of $218,017,000, 
a $26,846,000 or 11-percent reduction from the request. That 
gross appropriation is offset by $125,388,000 in miscellaneous 
revenues resulting in a net appropriation of $92,629,000.
    The Committee has generally reduced accounts within 
departmental administration by 16 percent from the amount 
requested. The exceptions are general management which was 
reduced only 10 percent and provides funding for rent, 
telephone service, copiers, contract audits, and other 
essential overhead costs; policy analysis and systems studies 
which was reduced 40 percent because of the Committee's concern 
that the maintenance of a policy structure separate from the 
programmatic offices contributes to the lack of integrated 
strategic planning; consumer affairs and public affairs which 
together total only $90,000; and environmental policy studies 
which was reduced 50 percent and appears to overlap 
significantly with policy analysis and system studies.
    The Committee recommendation includes $6,000,000 which is 
available only for severance, termination, and related costs 
resulting from the reduction in personnel in departmental 
administration.

                                revenues

    The revenue estimate for fiscal year 1997 is $125,388,000, 
an amount equal to the budget request, an increase of 
$3,082,000 from the revenues estimated for fiscal year 1996.

                        summary recommendations

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

                      Office of Inspector General

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $25,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      29,605,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              23,103,000

    The Office of Inspector General provides agencywide audit, 
inspection, and investigative functions to identify and correct 
management and administrative deficiencies which create 
conditions for existing or potential instances of fraud, waste, 
and mismanagement. The audit function provides financial and 
performance audits of programs and operations. The inspection 
function provides independent inspections and analyses of the 
effectiveness, efficiency, and economy of programs and 
operations. The investigative function provides for the 
detection and investigation of improper and illegal activities 
involving programs, personnel, and operations.
    Due to severe budget constraints and the proposed 
downsizing of the Department of Energy, the Committee 
recommendation is $23,103,000. This is a reduction of 
$1,897,000 from the amount provided in fiscal year 1996 and 
$6,502,000 below the budget request.

                    Power Marketing Administrations

    Public Law 95-91 transferred to the Department of Energy 
the power marketing functions under section 5 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1944 and all other functions of the Department 
of the Interior with respect to the Alaska Power 
Administration, Bonneville Power Administration, Southeastern 
Power Administration, Southwestern Power Administration, and 
the power marketing functions of the Bureau of Reclamation, now 
included in the Western Area Power Administration.
    All power marketing administrations except Bonneville are 
funded annually with appropriations, and related receipts are 
deposited in the Treasury. Bonneville operations are self-
financed under authority of Public Law 93-454, the Federal 
Columbia River Transmission System Act of 1974, which 
authorizes Bonneville to use its revenues to finance operating 
costs, maintenance and capital construction, and sell bonds to 
the Treasury if necessary to finance any remaining capital 
program requirements.

         operation and maintenance, Alaska power administration

Appropriations, 1996....................................      $4,260,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................       4,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                               4,000,000

    The Alaska Power Administration [APA] is responsible for 
operation, maintenance, and marketing of power for Alaska's two 
Federal hydroelectric projects. The operating projects are the 
30 megawatt Eklutna project near Anchorage and the 78 megawatt 
Snettisham project near Juneau. Project facilities include 
dams, reservoirs, powerplants, transmission systems, and 
necessary maintenance facilities.
    Public Law 104-58 authorizes the sale of the Alaska Power 
Administration assets. The Snettisham project will be sold to 
the State of Alaska and Eklutna project to the three current 
power customers, Municipal Light & Power, Chugach Electric 
Association, Inc., and Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. 
While the Department and the APA expect to complete sale of the 
Eklutna project by early 1997 and continue to pursue the 
financing arrangements for completion of the sale of the 
Snettisham project to the State of Alaska, continued operation 
and maintenance are required for a portion of fiscal year 1997. 
As such, the Committee recommendation is $4,000,000, the same 
as the budget. If the sales occur before the end of fiscal year 
1997, any unobligated appropriations will be returned to the 
Treasury of the United States.

                  bonneville power administration fund

    The Bonneville Power Administration is the Federal electric 
power marketing agency in the Pacific Northwest, a 300,000-
square-mile service area that encompasses Oregon, Washington, 
Idaho, western Montana, and small portions of adjacent Western 
States in the Columbia River drainage basin. Bonneville markets 
hydroelectric power from 30 Corps of Engineers and Bureau of 
Reclamation projects, as well as thermal energy from non-
Federal generating facilities in the region. Bonneville also 
markets and exchanges surplus electric power interregionally 
over the Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest Intertie with 
California, and in Canada over interconnections with utilities 
in British Columbia.
    Bonneville constructs, operates and maintains the Nation's 
largest high-voltage transmission system, consisting of 14,800 
circuit-miles of transmission line and 390 substations with an 
installed capacity of 22,279 megawatts.
    Public Law 93-454, the Federal Columbia River Transmission 
System Act of 1974, placed Bonneville on a self-financed basis. 
With the passage in 1980 of Public Law 96-501, the Pacific 
Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, 
Bonneville's responsibilities were expanded to include meeting 
the net firm load growth of the region, investing in cost-
effective, regionwide energy conservation, and acquiring 
generating resources to meet these requirements.
    Borrowing authority.--A total of $3,750,000 has been made 
available to Bonneville as permanent borrowing authority. Each 
year the Committee reviews the budgeted amounts Bonneville 
plans to use of this total and reports a recommendation on 
these borrowing requirements. For fiscal year 1996, the 
Committee recommends an additional increment of $287,000,000 in 
new borrowing authority, the same as the budget request, for 
transmission system construction, system replacement, energy 
resources, fish and wildlife, and capital equipment programs.
    The Committee continues to support the concept of financing 
a portion of capital investments from revenues and alternatives 
such as the use of third-party financing to extend the 
availability of the current total borrowing authority. The 
Committee commends Bonneville's efforts to date to review 
current spending programs. With the severe budget constraints 
expected to continue in the future, appropriating additional 
funds to replenish Bonneville's borrowing authority will be 
very difficult.
    Budget revisions and notification.--The Committee expects 
Bonneville to adhere to the borrowing authority estimates 
recommended by the Congress and promptly inform the Committee 
of any exceptional circumstances which would necessitate the 
need for Bonneville to obligate borrowing authority in excess 
of such amounts.
    Eastern Canadian Intertie.--The Committee has not included 
language for the eastern Canadian Intertie. While the Committee 
believes it may be necessary to include such language to ensure 
that the Untied States will be able to construct the 
transmission facilities necessary to return the Canadian 
entitlement in 2003, the Committee has deferred action to allow 
some additional time for consultations about the line with 
interested parties.
    Repayment.--During fiscal year 1997, Bonneville plans to 
pay the Treasury $835,000,000, of which $278,000,000 is to 
repay principal on the Federal investment in these facilities.
    Fish and wildlife agreement.--Last fall Bonneville agreed 
to a 6-year fixed budget for its fish and wildlife expenditures 
that will provide $252,000,000 per year in program funding, 
plus $90,000,000 to $280,000,000 per year for hydro system 
operating costs. The budget is comprised of several categories 
including direct expenditures on fish and wildlife projects, 
reimbursement to other Federal agencies and the Federal 
Treasury, the cost of purchase replacement power, and foregone 
hydro systems revenues. In fiscal year 1997, the direct 
expenditure portion of the budget is expected to be 
$127,000,000. In fiscal year 1997, and each subsequent fiscal 
year, the Administrator shall use the funding available under 
the direct program portion of the fish and wildlife budget 
first to fund those measures, including reasonable and prudent 
alternatives, that are identified as mandatory Bonneville 
responsibilities for that fiscal year pursuant to the 
biological opinions issued under the Endangered Species Act. 
The remainder of the funding available under the direct program 
portion shall be used in a manner consistent with the Northwest 
Power Planning Council Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife 
Program.
    Renewable resource development.--The Committee understands 
that the BPA, in keeping with the goals of the 1980 Northwest 
Power Planning and Conservation Act, is involved in four 
renewable resource demonstration projects in the region. The 
Committee supports BPA's efforts to confirm and expand the 
supply of renewable resources in the Northwest, and expects BPA 
to complete the two wind and two geothermal projects it has 
underway. Completing these projects will lay the foundation for 
building a renewable marketplace in the region, and will 
benefit both the environment and the local economy. The 
Committee understands that BPA may spend up to $40,000,000 each 
year on these projects once they are all in service, and 
encourages BPA to move forward expeditiously on their 
completion. The Committee directs BPA to prepare a report on 
the progress of this program by March 1, 1997.
    Renewable and conservation resources.--The Committee 
continues to strongly support conservation and renewable energy 
resources. These resources remain the foundation for a 
sustainable energy future in the Pacific Northwest as the 
region approaches the new century. The Committee strongly 
encourages the Bonneville Power Administration, the Northwest 
Power Planning Council, and other participants in the regional 
review being conducted by the Governors of the four Northwest 
States, to explore all innovative measures to assure 
achievement of pace-setting energy conservation and renewable 
resource targets in the coming decade. The Committee urges that 
new mechanisms be defined to assure adequate funding to sustain 
and substantially expand energy conservation and renewable 
resources as the electric power industry transitions to a more 
deregulated energy marketplace. While the Committee recognizes 
the BPA's need to remain competitive and assure its payments to 
the U.S. Treasury, BPA should make every effort to fulfill the 
commitments it has made to renewable energy and energy 
conservation resources.
    Energy services businesses.--The Committee understands that 
there are concerns regarding whether BPA should engage in 
energy service business activities and the financial magnitude 
of the activities. The Committee also understands that BPA has 
committed to present the energy services business to the 
comprehensive review initiated by the four Governors for the 
their consideration. The Committee believes it is important 
that the region make recommendations as to whether BPA should 
expand its activities into energy services and that BPA limit 
its activities until those recommendations are forthcoming. The 
Committee directs that BPA limit any new energy service 
business contracts to $7,000,000 between now and January 1, 
1997, in order to allow adequate time for the regional review 
to consider the appropriate role for BPA in these activities. 
Such contracts should also assure that cost recovery will not 
be borne by other BPA customers.
    Direct loans for energy conservation.--The Committee has 
included bill language relating to new direct loans for energy 
conservation under Public Law 96-501, the Pacific Northwest 
Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act.
    Voluntary separation incentives.--The Committee rejects the 
House provision repealing BPA's ratepayer funded voluntary 
separation incentives [VSI's] program. Permanent authority for 
VSI's were provided by Congress in the fiscal year 1996 Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act. The BPA Administrator 
recently announced new staff reduction targets of approximately 
500 BPA employees and approximately 400 contractors by 1999. 
The Committee recognizes that continued BPA acccss to ratepayer 
funded VSI's: (1) is an important component of the agency's 
overall strategy to maintain a high probability of making its 
annual Treasury payment; and (2) will be critical to the 
success of this 3-year effort by which Bonneville expects to 
save about $70,000,000 annually.
    Mid-Columbia hydroelectric plants.--The Committee is aware 
that there are significant costs for the mid-Columbia 
hydroelectric projects associated with fish and wildlife 
mitigation. In particular, there are costs being incurred as a 
result of water releases from upstream Federal facilities which 
the mid-Columbia projects cannot control because they have 
limited storage capability. The Committee is also aware that 
the Bonneville Power Administration has incurred significant 
costs for fish and wildlife mitigation and has worked hard to 
remain in a position where its power is competitively priced. 
The Committee believes, however, that the Bonneville system has 
more flexibility than the mid-Columbias, including greater 
system capacity and refined marketing authority, to operate in 
a manner consistent with regionwide fish and wildlife needs. 
The Committee, therefore, urges Bonneville to enter into 
equitable energy exchange agreements with the mid-Columbia 
project owners. Such agreement should benefit mid-Columbia 
project owners while not increasing costs for Bonneville Power 
Administration.

      operation and maintenance, southeastern power administration

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $19,843,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      20,900,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              13,859,000

    The Southeastern Power Administration markets hydroelectric 
power produced at Corps of Engineers projects in 10 
Southeastern States. There are 23 projects now in operation 
with an installed capacity of 3,092 megawatts. Southeastern 
does not own or operate any transmission facilities and carries 
out its marketing program by utilizing the existing 
transmission systems of the power utilities in the area. This 
is accomplished through wheeling arrangements between 
Southeastern and each of the area utilities with transmission 
lines connected to the projects. The utility agrees to deliver 
specified amounts of Federal power to customers of the 
Government, and Southeastern agrees to compensate the utility 
for the wheeling service performed.
    The Committee recommendation of $13,859,000 is $7,041,000 
below the budget request. The reduction from the amount is 
possible because $13,586,000 of prior-year balances are 
available for use in fiscal year 1997.

      operation and maintenance, southwestern power administration

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $29,778,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      26,900,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              25,210,000

    The Southwestern Power Administration is the marketing 
agent for the power generated at Corps of Engineers' 
hydroelectric plants in the six-State area of Kansas, Oklahoma, 
Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana with a total installed 
capacity of 2,158 megawatts. It operates and maintains some 
1,380 miles of transmission lines, 24 generating projects, and 
24 substations, and sells its power at wholesale primarily to 
publicly and cooperatively owned electric distribution 
utilities.
    The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 1997 is 
$25,210,000, a reduction of $1,690,000 from the amount of the 
request.

 construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance western area 
                          power administration

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $257,652,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     217,891,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             201,582,000

    The Western Area Power Administration is responsible for 
marketing electric power generated by the Bureau of 
Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, and the International 
Boundary and Water Commission which operate hydropower 
generating plants in 15 Central and Western States encompassing 
a 1.3-million-square-mile geographic area. Western is also 
responsible for the operation and maintenance of 16,727 miles 
of high-voltage transmission lines with 257 substations. 
Western distributes power generated by 55 plants with a maximum 
operating capacity of 10,576 megawatts.
    Western, through its power marketing program, must secure 
revenues sufficient to meet the annual costs of operation and 
maintenance of the generating and transmission facilities, 
purchased power, wheeling, and other expenses, in order to 
repay all of the power investment with interest, and to repay 
that portion of the Government's irrigation and other nonpower 
investments which are beyond the water users' repayment 
capability. Under the Colorado River basin power marketing 
fund, which encompasses the Colorado River basin, Fort Peck, 
and Colorado River storage facilities, all operation and 
maintenance and power marketing expenses are financed from 
revenues.

                             recommendation

    The Committee recommendation for Western for fiscal year 
1997 is $201,582,000, a decrease of $16,309,000 from the budget 
request of $217,891,000.
    The amount to be derived from the Department of the 
Interior reclamation fund is $3,774,000, the same amount as the 
request.

           falcon and amistad operating and maintenance fund

    Creation of the Falcon and Amistad operating and 
maintenance fund was directed by the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994-95. This legislation also 
directed that the fund be administered by the Administrator of 
the Western Area Power Administration for use by the 
Commissioner of the United States Section of the International 
Boundary and Water Commission to defray operation, maintenance, 
and emergency costs for the hydroelectric facilities at the 
Falcon and Amistad Dams in Texas. Funds for these costs were 
previously included in the appropriations of the Department of 
State.
    The Committee recommendation is $970,000, the same as the 
budget request.

                        recommendation summaries

    Details of the Committee's recommendations are included in 
the table at the end of this title.

                  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

                         salaries and expenses

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $131,290,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     159,397,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             146,290,000

                salaries and expenses--revenues applied

Appropriations, 1996....................................   -$131,290,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................    -159,397,000

Committee recommendation

                                                            -146,290,000

    The Committee provides $146,290,000 for the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission. Revenues are established at a rate equal 
to the amount provided for program activities, resulting in a 
net appropriation of zero.

                                              DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY                                              
                                            [In thousands of dollars]                                           
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Current year                          Committee   
                       Project title                             enacted       Budget estimate   recommendation 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                
          ENERGY SUPPLY, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT                                                               
                                                                                                                
SOLAR AND RENEWABLE ENERGY:                                                                                     
    Solar energy:                                                                                               
        Solar building technology research................            2,000             5,000             3,000 
        Photovoltaic energy systems.......................           65,000            86,994            65,000 
        Solar thermal energy systems......................           25,000            23,750            21,500 
        Biofuels energy systems...........................           55,300            80,890            55,300 
        Wind energy systems...............................           32,500            49,650            15,000 
        Renewable energy production incentive program.....  ................            3,489   ................
        International solar energy program................            4,000   ................  ................
        Solar technology transfer.........................            4,300   ................  ................
        National renewable energy laboratory..............              500             2,200   ................
            Construction:                                                                                       
                96-E-100 FTLB renovation and expansion,                                                         
                 Golden, CO...............................            1,500             2,800   ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, National renewable energy                                                           
                   laboratory.............................            2,000             5,000   ................
        Resource assessment...............................            2,000   ................  ................
        Solar and renewable energy deployment.............  ................            8,509   ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
            Subtotal, Solar Energy........................          192,100           263,282           159,800 
        Use of prior year balances........................           -4,888   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
            Total, Solar Energy...........................          187,212           263,282           159,800 
                                                           =====================================================
    Geothermal:                                             ................                                    
        Geothermal technology development.................           30,447            35,600            30,500 
        Use of prior year balances........................             -555   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
            Total, Geothermal.............................           29,892            35,600            30,500 
                                                           =====================================================
    Hydrogen research.....................................           14,500            11,012             9,000 
                                                           =====================================================
    Hydropower:                                                                                                 
        Small scale hydropower development................            1,500   ................            1,500 
                                                           =====================================================
    Electric energy systems and storage:                                                                        
        Electric energy systems:                                                                                
            Electric field effects research...............            9,924   ................  ................
            System and materials research.................           19,000   ................  ................
            Use of prior year balances....................             -615   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                Subtotal, Electric energy systems.........           28,309   ................  ................
        Energy storage systems:                             ................                                    
            Battery storage...............................            2,000   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                Subtotal, Energy storage systems..........            2,000   ................  ................
        Electric and magnetic fields R&D..................  ................            8,000             8,000 
        High temperature superconducting R&D..............  ................           23,050            20,000 
        Energy storage systems............................  ................            4,000             4,000 
        Climate challenge.................................  ................            1,000   ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
            Total, Electric energy systems and storage....           30,309            36,050            32,000 
                                                           =====================================================
    Program direction.....................................           11,800            17,301            13,841 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, SOLAR AND RENEWABLE ENERGY...................          275,213           363,245           246,641 
                                                           =====================================================
NUCLEAR ENERGY:                                                                                                 
    Nuclear energy R&D:                                                                                         
        Light water reactor...............................           40,000            40,000            22,000 
        Advanced radioisotope power system................           48,512            40,000            38,810 
        Nuclear technology R&D............................  ................           30,000            20,000 
        Program direction.................................            8,000   ................  ................
        Policy and management.............................            5,000   ................  ................
        Oak Ridge landlord................................           14,400            16,000            11,520 
        Test reactor area landlord........................            2,000             3,000             2,000 
            Construction:                                                                                       
                95-E-201 Test reactor area fire and life                                                        
                 safety improvements, Idaho National                                                            
                 Engineering Laboratory, ID...............            1,900             1,000             1,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                    Subtotal, Test reactor area landlord..            3,900             4,000             3,000 
        Advanced test reactor fusion irradiation..........            2,303               800               800 
        University reactor fuel assistance and support....            3,500             6,950             4,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Nuclear energy R&D.......................          125,615           137,750           100,130 
                                                           =====================================================
    Termination costs.....................................           79,000            76,900            94,900 
        Construction:                                                                                           
            97-E-200 Modifications to reactors, sodium                                                          
             system drain and closure, Argonne National                                                         
             Lab--West, ID................................  ................            1,200             1,200 
            97-E-201 Modifications to reactors, hot fuel                                                        
             examination facility equipment upgrades, ANL-                                                      
             W............................................  ................            1,000             1,000 
            95-E-207 Modifications to reactors,                                                                 
             experimental breeder reactor--II sodium                                                            
             processing facility Argonne National                                                               
             Laboratory--West, ID.........................            1,700   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                Subtotal, Construction....................            1,700             2,200             2,200 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                Total, Termination costs..................           80,700            79,100            97,100 
                                                           =====================================================
    Isotope support.......................................           24,658            12,704            17,704 
    Program direction.....................................  ................           18,500            14,800 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY...............................          230,973           248,054           229,734 
                                                           =====================================================
ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH:                                                                                 
    Environment, safety and health........................          114,933            73,160            63,200 
    Nuclear safety policy.................................           13,500   ................  ................
    Program direction.....................................  ................           39,046            31,237 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH...............          128,433           112,206            94,437 
                                                           =====================================================
ENERGY RESEARCH:                                                                                                
    Biological and environmental research:                                                                      
        Biological and environmental research R&D.........          349,891           342,962           352,962 
            Construction:                                                                                       
                94-E-337 Advanced light source structural                                                       
                 biology support facility, LBL............            2,600   ................  ................
                94-E-338 Structural biology center, ANL...            4,295   ................  ................
                94-E-339 Human genome lab, LBL............            5,700             1,000             1,000 
                91-EM-100 Environmental & molecular                                                             
                 sciences laboratory, PNL, Richland, WA...           50,000            35,113            35,113 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Construction..................           62,595            36,113            36,113 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Biological & environ. research                                                      
                   R&D....................................          412,486           379,075           389,075 
        BER program direction.............................            7,000   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Biological and environmental research....          419,486           379,075           389,075 
                                                           =====================================================
    Fusion energy.........................................          244,144           255,600           240,000 
                                                           =====================================================
    Basic energy sciences:                                                                                      
        Materials sciences................................          367,400           334,560           332,060 
        Chemical sciences.................................          198,400           173,370           171,870 
        Applied mathematical sciences.....................          116,500   ................  ................
        Engineering and geosciences.......................           41,700            41,250            41,250 
        Advanced energy projects..........................           12,300   ................  ................
        Energy biosciences................................           30,200            28,185            28,185 
        Program direction.................................            9,500   ................  ................
        Capital equipment.................................  ................           45,695            45,695 
        Construction:                                                                                           
            GPE-400 General plant projects................  ................            9,275             9,275 
            97-E-305 Accelerator and reactor improvements                                                       
             and modifications, various locations.........  ................            2,500             2,500 
            96-E-305 Accelerator and reactor improvements                                                       
             and modifications, various locations.........           10,475   ................  ................
            95-E-305 Accelerator improvement projects.....  ................            9,840             9,840 
            89-R-402 6-7 GeV syn. radiation source, ANL...            3,186   ................  ................
            96-E-300 Combustion research facility, Phase                                                        
             II, SNL/L....................................            2,000             9,000             9,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction......................           15,661            30,615            30,615 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Total, Basic energy sciences................          791,661           653,675           649,675 
                                                           =====================================================
    Other energy research:                                                                                      
        Computational and technology research.............  ................          158,143           158,500 
        Energy research analyses..........................            3,463             2,000             2,000 
        Laboratory technology transfer....................           18,000   ................  ................
        Advisory and oversight............................            6,200   ................  ................
        Policy and management.............................            2,200   ................  ................
        Program direction.................................  ................           42,154            27,003 
        Multiprogram energy labs--facility support:                                                             
            Multiprogram general purpose facilities.......  ................            7,625             5,000 
                Construction:                                                                                   
                    MEL-001 Multiprogram energy laboratory                                                      
                   infrastructure projects, various                                                             
                   locations..............................  ................           21,260   ................
                    95-E-301 Central heating plant                                                              
                   rehabilitation, Phase I (ANL)..........            2,500   ................            2,500 
                    95-E-302 Applied science center, phase                                                      
                   I (BNL)................................            3,270   ................  ................
                    95-E-303 Electrical safety rehab (PNL)            1,500   ................            1,500 
                    95-E-310 Multiprogram laboratory                                                            
                   rehabilitation, phase I (PNL)..........            2,740   ................            2,960 
                    94-E-351 Fuel storage and transfer                                                          
                   facility upgrade (BNL).................              440   ................  ................
                    94-E-363 Roofing improvements (ORNL)..            2,038   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                      Subtotal, Construction..............           12,488            21,260             6,960 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                      Subtotal, Multiprogram gen. purpose                                                       
                   facilities.............................           12,488            28,885            11,960 
            Environment, safety and health................            6,656   ................  ................
                Construction:                                                                                   
                    96-E-333 Multiprogram energy                                                                
                   laboratories upgrades, various                                                               
                   locations..............................            4,400   ................            7,424 
                    95-E-307 Fire Safety imp. III (ANL)...            1,000   ................            1,000 
                    95-E-308 Sanitary system mods. II                                                           
                   (BNL)..................................            1,540   ................            1,032 
                    95-E-309 Loss prevention upgrades                                                           
                   (BNL)..................................            2,480   ................            4,620 
                    93-E-320 Fire and safety improvements,                                                      
                   phase II (ANL).........................            2,411   ................              224 
                    93-E-323 Fire and safety systems                                                            
                   upgrade phase I (LBL)..................            1,130   ................  ................
                    93-E-324 Hazardous materials                                                                
                   safeguards, phase I (LBL)..............            1,288   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                      Subtotal, Construction..............           14,249   ................           14,300 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                      Subtotal, Environment, safety and                                                         
                   health.................................           20,905   ................           14,300 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                      Subtotal, Multiprogram energy labs--                                                      
                   fac. suppor............................           33,393            28,885            26,260 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                      Total, Other energy research........           63,256           231,182           213,763 
                                                           =====================================================
                      TOTAL, ENERGY RESEARCH..............        1,518,547         1,519,532         1,492,513 
                                                           =====================================================
ENERGY SUPPORT ACTIVITIES:                                                                                      
    University and science education programs.............           20,000            19,900            15,000 
    Technical information management program..............           11,000             2,300             2,300 
        Program direction.................................  ................            8,700             8,700 
        Construction......................................            1,000             1,000             1,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Technical information management program.           12,000            12,000            12,000 
                                                           =====================================================
    Field offices and management..........................  ................          121,723           110,000 
    Information systems investment........................  ................           14,900   ................
                                                           =====================================================
    In-house energy management............................  ................            3,941             1,000 
    Construction:                                                                                               
        IHE--500 Modifications for energy mgmt............  ................            1,759   ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, In-house energy management...............  ................            5,700             1,000 
                                                           =====================================================
          TOTAL, ENERGY SUPPORT ACTIVITIES................           32,000           174,223           138,000 
                                                           =====================================================
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION & WASTE MGMT. (NON-DEFENSE):                                                          
    Environmental restoration.............................          366,400           358,239           330,000 
                                                           =====================================================
    Waste management......................................          171,896           192,799           180,000 
    Construction:                                                                                               
        GP-E-600 ANL waste handling facility, INEL........  ................              360               360 
        94-E-602 Bethel Valley federal facility agreement                                                       
         upgrades, ORNL...................................              300             1,106             1,106 
        93-E-900 Long-term storage of TMI-2 fuel, INEL....            4,048   ................  ................
        92-E-601 Melton Valley liquid low level waste                                                           
         collection and transfer system upgrade, ORNL.....              339   ................  ................
        91-E-600 Rehabilitation of waste management                                                             
         building 306, ANL................................              787             2,066             2,066 
        88-R-812 Hazardous waste handling facility, LBL...              671   ................  ................
        88-R-830 Liquid low-level waste collection and                                                          
         transfer system upgrade, ORNL....................            4,000             2,692             2,692 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction..........................           10,145             6,224             6,224 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Waste management.........................          182,041           199,023           186,224 
                                                           =====================================================
    Nuclear materials and facilities stabilization........           73,100            84,782            73,100 
    Construction:                                                                                               
        93-E-900 Long-term storage of TMI-2 fuel, INEL....  ................            6,571             6,571 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Nuclear materials and fac stabilization..           73,100            91,353            79,671 
                                                           =====================================================
    Site operations.......................................  ................            2,799   ................
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MGMT.....          621,541           651,414           595,895 
                                                           =====================================================
      Subtotal, Energy supply, research and development...        2,806,707         3,068,674         2,801,220 
                                                           =====================================================
Use of prior year balances................................          -79,300   ................          -48,177 
General reduction, ESR&D..................................  ................          -48,177   ................
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, ENERGY SUPPLY, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT......        2,727,407         3,020,497         2,749,043 
                                                           =====================================================
         URANIUM SUPPLY AND ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES                                                               
                                                                                                                
Uranium program activities................................           83,500            77,594            52,466 
    Program direction.....................................  ................            5,672             4,000 
    Construction:                                                                                               
        96-U-201 depleted UF6 cylinder storage yards,                                                           
         Paducah, Kentucky gaseous diffusion plant........            3,000             4,000             3,000 
        93-U-200 UF6 cylinders and storage yards, Paducah,                                                      
         KY and Portsmouth, OH gaseous diffusion plants...            3,400   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction..........................            6,400             4,000             3,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Uranium supply & enrichment activities           89,900            87,266            59,466 
                                                           =====================================================
Revenues--Sales...........................................          -34,903           -42,200           -42,200 
Use of prior year balances................................          -25,703           -17,266           -17,266 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, URANIUM SUPPLY AND ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES.....           29,294            27,800   ................
                                                           =====================================================
  URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING                                                        
                           FUND                                                                                 
                                                                                                                
Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund..................          278,807           240,200           220,200 
                                                           =====================================================
               GENERAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH                                                                     
                                                                                                                
High energy physics:                                                                                            
    Physics research......................................          141,000           141,290           141,000 
    Facility operations...................................          353,077           362,955           359,998 
        Construction:                                                                                           
            97-G-303 Master substation upgrade, SLAC......  ................            3,000             3,000 
            94-G-304 B-Factory, SLAC......................           52,000            45,000            45,000 
            92-G-302 Fermilab main injector, Fermilab.....           52,000            52,000            52,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction......................          104,000           100,000           100,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Facility operations...............          457,077           462,955           459,998 
    High energy technology................................           68,923            74,880            71,923 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, High energy physics..........................          667,000           679,125           672,921 
                                                           =====================================================
Nuclear physics...........................................          236,925           253,425           253,425 
    Construction:                                                                                               
        96-G-302 Accelerator improvements and                                                                   
         modifications, various locations.................            2,575   ................  ................
        91-G-300 Relativistic heavy ion collider, BNL.....           65,000            65,000            65,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction..........................           67,575            65,000            65,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Nuclear physics..........................          304,500           318,425           318,425 
                                                           =====================================================
General science program direction.........................            9,500            11,600             9,280 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, General science...........................          981,000         1,009,150         1,000,626 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, GENERAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH.................          981,000         1,009,150         1,000,626 
                                                           =====================================================
                DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION                                                                     
                                                                                                                
Administrative operations:                                                                                      
    Office of the Secretary--salaries and expenses........            2,500             2,850             2,280 
    General management--personnel compensation and                                                              
     benefits.............................................          185,000           119,647           100,695 
    Severance, termination and related cost...............  ................  ................            6,000 
    General management--other expenses....................          157,000            83,604            74,900 
    Program support:                                                                                            
        Minority economic impact..........................            2,900             2,900             2,320 
        Policy analysis and system studies................            2,900             3,493             2,096 
        Consumer affairs..................................               40                40                40 
        Public affairs....................................               50                65                50 
        Environmental policy studies......................            4,000             4,928             2,500 
        Scientific and technical training.................            1,000             1,000               800 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Program support.......................           10,890            12,426             7,806 
    General reduction.....................................  ................  ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Administrative operations....................          355,390           218,527           191,681 
                                                           =====================================================
Cost of work for others...................................           22,826            26,336            26,336 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Departmental Administration...............          378,216           244,863           218,017 
Use of unobligated balances and other adjustments.........          -11,519   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Total, Departmental administration (gross)..........          366,697           244,863           218,017 
Miscellaneous revenues....................................         -122,306          -125,388          -125,388 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net)............          244,391           119,475            92,629 
                                                           =====================================================
                OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL                                                                     
                                                                                                                
Office of Inspector General...............................           26,915            30,502            24,000 
Use of prior year balances................................           -1,915              -897              -897 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL..................           25,000            29,605            23,103 
                                                           =====================================================
             ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES                                                                   
                                                                                                                
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES:                                                                                             
    Stockpile stewardship:                                                                                      
        Core stockpile stewardship........................        1,078,403         1,062,570         1,142,570 
            Construction:                                                                                       
                96-D-102 Stockpile stewardship facilities                                                       
                 revitalization, Phase VI, various                                                              
                 locations................................            2,520            19,250            19,250 
                96-D-103 ATLAS, Los Alamos National                                                             
                 Laboratory...............................            8,400            15,100            15,100 
                96-D-104 Process and environmental                                                              
                 technology laboratory, SNL...............            1,800            14,100            14,100 
                96-D-105 Contained firing facility                                                              
                 addition, LLNL...........................            6,600            17,100            17,100 
                95-D-102 Chemistry and metallurgy research                                                      
                 (CMR) upgrades project, LANL.............            9,940            15,000            15,000 
                94-D-102 Nuclear Weapons Research,                                                              
                 development and testing facilities                                                             
                 revitalization, Phase V, various                                                               
                 locations................................           12,200             7,787             7,787 
                93-D-102 Nevada support facility, NV......           15,650   ................  ................
                90-D-102 Nuclear Weapons Research,                                                              
                 Development and testing facilities                                                             
                 revitalization, Phase III, various                                                             
                 locations................................            6,200   ................  ................
                88-D-106 Nuclear weapons research,                                                              
                 development and testing facilities                                                             
                 revitalization, Phase II, various                                                              
                 locations................................           17,995   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                    Subtotal, Construction................           81,305            88,337            88,337 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                    Subtotal, Core stockpile stewardship..        1,159,708         1,150,907         1,230,907 
        Inertial fusion...................................          203,267           234,560           234,560 
            Construction:                                                                                       
                96-D-111 National ignition facility, TBD..           37,400           131,900           131,900 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Inertial fusion...............          240,667           366,460           366,460 
        Technology transfer/education:                                                                          
            Technology transfer...........................          150,000            49,400            51,900 
            Education.....................................           10,000            10,000            10,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Technology transfer/education.....          160,000            59,400            61,900 
        Marshall Island/Dose reconstruction...............            6,800   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Stockpile stewardship....................        1,567,175         1,576,767         1,659,267 
                                                           =====================================================
    Stockpile management..................................        1,911,458         1,704,470         1,875,470 
        Construction:                                                                                           
            Production base:                                                                                    
                88-D-122 Facilities capability assurance                                                        
                 program (FCAP), various locations........            8,660            21,940            21,940 
                96-D-126 Tritium loading line                                                                   
                 modifications, Savannah River Site, SC...           12,200   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Production base...............           20,860            21,940            21,940 
            Environmental, safety and health:                                                                   
                97-D-121 Consolidated pit packaging                                                             
                 system, Pantex plant, Amarillo, TX.......  ................              870               870 
                97-D-122 Nuclear materials storage                                                              
                 facility renovation, LANL, Los Alamos, NM  ................            4,000             4,000 
                97-D-123 Structural upgrades, Kansas City                                                       
                 plant, Kansas City, KS...................  ................            1,400             1,400 
                97-D-124 Steam plant waste water treatment                                                      
                 facility, upgrade, Y-12 plant, Oak Ridge,                                                      
                 TN.......................................  ................              600               600 
                96-D-122 Sewage treatment quality upgrade                                                       
                 (STQU) Pantex plant......................              600               100               100 
                96-D-123 Retrofit HVAX and chillers, for                                                        
                 Ozone protection Y-12 plant..............            3,100             7,000             7,000 
                95-D-122 Sanitary sewer upgrade, Y-12                                                           
                 plant....................................            6,300            10,900            10,900 
                94-D-124 Hydrogen fluoride supply system,                                                       
                 Y-12 plant...............................            8,700             4,900             4,900 
                94-D-125 Upgrade life safety, Kansas City                                                       
                 plant....................................            5,500             5,200             5,200 
                94-D-127 Emergency notification system,                                                         
                 Pantex plant.............................            2,000             2,200             2,200 
                94-D-128 Environmental safety and health                                                        
                 analytical laboratory, Pantex plant......            4,000   ................  ................
                93-D-122 Life safety upgrades, Y-12 plant.            7,200             7,200             7,200 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Environmental, safety and                                                           
                   health.................................           37,400            44,370            44,370 
            Safeguards and security:                                                                            
                88-D-123 Security enhancement, Pantex                                                           
                 plant....................................           13,400             9,739             9,739 
            Nuclear weapons incident response:                                                                  
                96-D-125 Washington measurement operations                                                      
                 facility, Andrews Air Force Base, MD.....              900             3,825             3,825 
            Reconfiguration:                                                                                    
                93-D-123 Non-nuclear reconfiguration,                                                           
                 various locations........................           41,065            14,487            14,487 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Construction..................          113,625            94,361            94,361 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Total, Stockpile management.............        2,025,083         1,798,831         1,969,831 
                                                           =====================================================
    Program direction.....................................          115,000           334,404           349,504 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Weapons activities........................        3,707,258         3,710,002         3,978,602 
                                                           =====================================================
    Use of prior year balances............................         -209,744   ................  ................
    Streamline DOE contractors (undistributed)............          -37,200   ................  ................
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES...........................        3,460,314         3,710,002         3,978,602 
                                                           =====================================================
DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MGMT:                                                               
    Corrective activities:                                                                                      
        Construction:                                                                                           
            90-D-103 Environment, safety and health                                                             
             improvements, weapons R&D complex, LANL......            3,406   ................  ................
                                                           =====================================================
    Environmental restoration.............................        1,635,973         1,385,546         1,400,546 
        Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution..........  ................          376,648           376,648 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
            Total, Environmental restoration..............        1,635,973         1,762,194         1,777,194 
                                                           =====================================================
    Waste management......................................        2,295,994         1,448,326         1,586,726 
        Construction:                                                                                           
            97-D-402 Tank farm restoration and safe                                                             
             operations, Richland, WA.....................  ................            7,584             7,584 
            96-D-406 Spent nuclear fuels canister storage                                                       
             and stabilization facility, Richland, WA.....           42,000   ................  ................
            96-D-407 Mixed waste low level waste treatment                                                      
             project, Rocky Flats.........................            2,900   ................  ................
            96-D-408 Waste mgmt upgrades, various                                                               
             locations....................................            5,615            11,246            11,246 
            95-D-402 Install permanent electrical service                                                       
             WIPP, AL.....................................            4,314               752               752 
            95-D-405 Industrial landfill V and                                                                  
             construction/demolition landfill VII, Y-12                                                         
             Plant, Oak Ridge, TN.........................            4,600               200               200 
            95-D-406 Road 5-01 reconstruction, area 5, NV.            1,023   ................  ................
            95-D-407 219-S Secondary containment upgrade,                                                       
             Richland, WA.................................            1,000   ................  ................
            94-D-400 High explosive wastewater treatment                                                        
             system, LANL.................................            4,445   ................  ................
            94-D-402 Liquid waste treatment system, NTS...              282   ................  ................
            94-D-404 Melton Valley storage tank capacity                                                        
             increase, ORNL...............................           11,000             6,345             6,345 
            94-D-407 Initial tank retrieval systems,                                                            
             Richland, WA.................................           12,000            12,600            12,600 
            94-D-411 Solid waste operation complex                                                              
             Richland, WA.................................            6,606   ................  ................
            93-D-178 Building 374 liquid waste treatment                                                        
             facility, Rocky Flats Plant, CO..............            3,900   ................  ................
            93-D-181 Radioactive liquid waste line                                                              
             replacement, Richland, WA....................            5,000   ................  ................
            93-D-182 Replacement of cross-site transfer                                                         
             system, Richland, WA.........................           19,795             8,100             8,100 
            93-D-187 High level waste removal from filled                                                       
             waste tanks, Savannah River, SC..............           19,700            20,000            20,000 
            92-D-171 Mixed waste receiving and storage                                                          
             facility, LANL...............................            1,105   ................  ................
            92-D-188 Waste management ES&H, and compliance                                                      
             activities, various locations................            1,100   ................  ................
            90-D-172 Aging waste transfer line, Richland,                                                       
             WA...........................................            2,000   ................  ................
            90-D-177 RWMC transuranic (TRU) waste                                                               
             characterization and storage facility, ID....            1,428   ................  ................
            90-D-178 TSA retrieval enclosure, ID..........            2,606   ................  ................
            89-D-173 Tank farm ventilation upgrade,                                                             
             Richland, WA.................................              800   ................  ................
            89-D-174 Replacement high level waste                                                               
             evaporator, Savannah River, SC...............           11,500            11,500            11,500 
            86-D-103 Decontamination and waste treatment                                                        
             facility, LLNL, Livermore, CA................            8,885            10,000            10,000 
            83-D-148 Non-radioactive hazardous waste                                                            
             management, Savannah River, SC...............            1,000   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction......................          174,604            88,327            88,327 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Total, Waste management.....................        2,470,598         1,536,653         1,675,053 
                                                           =====================================================
    Nuclear materials and facilities stabilization........        1,447,108           818,664         1,215,718 
        Construction:                                                                                           
            97-D-450 Actinide packaging and storage                                                             
             facility, Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC.....  ................            7,900             7,900 
            97-D-451 B-Plant safety class ventilation                                                           
             upgrades, Richland, WA.......................  ................            1,500             1,500 
            96-D-406 Spent nuclear fuels canister storage                                                       
             and stabilization facility, Richland, WA.....  ................           60,672            60,672 
            96-D-457 Thermal treatment system, Richland,                                                        
             WA...........................................            1,000   ................  ................
            96-D-458 Site drainage control, Mound Plant,                                                        
             Miamisburg, OH...............................              885   ................  ................
            96-D-461 Electrical distribution upgrade,                                                           
             Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, ID....            1,539   ................            6,790 
            96-D-464 Electrical & utility systems upgrade,                                                      
             Idaho Chemical Processing Plant, Idaho                                                             
             National Engineering Laboratory, ID..........            4,952            10,440            10,440 
            96-D-468 Residue elimination project, Rocky                                                         
             Flats Plant, Golden, Co......................           33,100   ................  ................
            97-D-470 Environment monitoring laboratory,                                                         
             Savannah River, Aiken, SC....................  ................  ................            2,500 
            96-D-471 CFC HVAC/chiller retrofit, Savannah                                                        
             River Site, Aiken, SC........................            1,500   ................            8,541 
            97-D-473 Health physics site support facility,                                                      
             Savannah River, Aiken, SC....................  ................  ................            2,000 
            95-E-600 Hazardous materials training center,                                                       
             Richland, WA.................................  ................  ................            7,900 
            95-D-155 Upgrade site road infrastructure,                                                          
             Savannah River, South Carolina...............            2,900   ................            4,137 
            95-D-156 Radio trunking system, Savannah                                                            
             River, SC....................................            6,000   ................  ................
            95-D-454 324 Facility compliance/renovation,                                                        
             Richland, WA.................................            3,500   ................  ................
            95-D-456 Security facilities consolidation,                                                         
             Idaho Chemical Processing Plant, INEL, Idaho.            8,382             4,645             4,645 
            94-D-122 Underground storage tanks, Rocky                                                           
             Flats Plant, CO..............................            5,000   ................  ................
            94-D-401 Emergency response facility, INEL, ID            5,074   ................              547 
            94-D-412 300 area process sewer piping system                                                       
             upgrade, Richland, WA........................            1,000   ................  ................
            94-D-415 Idaho National Engineering Laboratory                                                      
             medical facilities, INEL, ID.................            3,601   ................  ................
            94-D-451 Infrastructure replacement, Rocky                                                          
             Flats Plant, CO..............................            2,940   ................  ................
            93-D-147 Domestic water system upgrade, Phase                                                       
             I & II, Savannah River, South Carolina.......            7,130   ................  ................
            92-D-123 Plant fire/security alarm system                                                           
             replacement, Rocky Flats Plant, Golden, CO...            9,560   ................  ................
            92-D-125 Master safeguards and security                                                             
             agreement/materials surveillance task force                                                        
             security upgrades, Rocky Flats Plant, CO.....            7,000   ................  ................
            92-D-181 Idaho national engineering laboratory                                                      
             fire and life safety improvements, INEL, ID..            6,883   ................  ................
            91-D-127 Criticality alarm & plant                                                                  
             annunciation utility replacement, Rocky Flats                                                      
             plant, Golden, CO............................            2,800   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction......................          114,746            85,157           117,572 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Total, Nuclear materials & fac.                                                                   
               stabilization..............................        1,561,854           903,821         1,333,290 
                                                           =====================================================
    Compliance and program coordination...................           31,251   ................  ................
        Construction:                                                                                           
            95-E-600 Hazardous materials training center,                                                       
             Richland, Washington.........................           15,000   ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Total, Compliance and program coordination..           46,251   ................  ................
                                                           =====================================================
    Site operations.......................................  ................          297,054   ................
        Construction:                                                                                           
            96-D-461 Electrical distribution upgrade,                                                           
             Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, ID....  ................            6,790   ................
            97-D-470 Environment monitoring laboratory,                                                         
             Savannah River, Aiken, SC....................  ................            2,500   ................
            96-D-471 CFC HVAC/chiller retrofit, Savannah                                                        
             River Site, Aiken, SC........................  ................            8,541   ................
            97-D-473 Health physics site support facility,                                                      
             Savannah River, Aiken, SC....................  ................            2,000   ................
            95-E-600 Hazardous materials management and                                                         
             emergency response training center, Richland,                                                      
             WA...........................................  ................            7,900   ................
            95-D-155 Upgrade site road infrastructure,                                                          
             Savannah River, SC...........................  ................            4,137   ................
            94-D-401 Emergency response facility, INEL, ID  ................              547   ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Total, Site operations......................  ................          329,469   ................
                                                           =====================================================
    Technology development................................          440,510           303,771           303,771 
    Transportation management.............................           13,158   ................  ................
    Analysis, education and risk management...............           90,022   ................  ................
    Policy and management.................................  ................           48,155            33,155 
    Environmental science program.........................  ................           52,136            62,136 
    Environmental management privatization................  ................          185,000           150,000 
    Program direction.....................................  ................          446,511           439,011 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Defense environmental management..........        6,261,772         5,567,710         5,773,610 
                                                           =====================================================
    Savannah river pension refund.........................          -37,000            -8,000            -8,000 
    Use of prior year balances............................         -667,240          -150,400          -150,400 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRON. RESTORATION AND WASTE MGMT..        5,557,532         5,409,310         5,615,210 
                                                           =====================================================
FIXED ASSET ACQUISITIONS (SEC. 621):                                                                            
    Defense Environmental Restoration & Waste Management                                                        
     Privatization initiative, various locations..........  ................          182,000           182,000 
                                                           =====================================================
OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES:                                                                                       
    Other national security programs:                                                                           
        Nonproliferation and national security:                                                                 
            Verification and control technology:                                                                
                Nonproliferation and verification, R&D....          246,142           194,919           221,919 
                Arms control..............................          160,964           181,244           214,144 
                Intelligence..............................           42,336            29,185            34,185 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Verification and control                                                            
                   technology.............................          449,442           405,348           470,248 
            Emergency management..........................           23,321            16,794            16,794 
            Nuclear safeguards and security...............           83,395            47,208            47,208 
            Security investigations.......................           20,000            22,000            20,000 
            Program direction--NN.........................  ................           95,622            95,622 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Nonproliferation and national                                                           
               security...................................          576,158           586,972           649,872 
        Environment, safety and health (Defense)..........  ................           53,094            53,094 
            Security evaluations..........................           14,707   ................  ................
            Nuclear safety................................           17,679   ................  ................
            Program direction--EH.........................  ................           10,706            10,706 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Environment, safety & health                                                            
               (Defense)..................................           32,386            63,800            63,800 
        Worker and community transition...................           82,500            62,659            62,659 
            Program direction--WT.........................  ................            4,341             4,341 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Worker and community transition...           82,500            67,000            67,000 
        Fissile materials disposition.....................           70,000            73,163            73,163 
            Program direction--MD.........................  ................            3,633             3,633 
            Construction:                                                                                       
                97-D-140 Consolidated special nuclear                                                           
                 materials storage plant, site TBD........  ................           17,000            17,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Fissile materials control/                                                          
                   disposition............................           70,000            93,796            93,796 
        Nuclear energy (Defense):                                                                               
            International nuclear safety..................  ................           66,200            66,200 
            Nuclear security..............................  ................            6,000             6,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Nuclear energy (Defense)..........  ................           72,200            72,200 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
              Total, Other national security programs.....          761,044           883,768           946,668 
                                                           =====================================================
    Naval reactors:                                                                                             
        Naval reactors development........................          652,568           623,130           623,130 
            Construction:                                                                                       
                GPN-101 General plant projects, various                                                         
                 locations................................            6,600             8,200             8,200 
                97-D-201 Advanced test reactor secondary                                                        
                 coolant system refurbishment, INEL, ID...  ................              400               400 
                95-D-200 Laboratory systems and hot cell                                                        
                 upgrades, various locations..............           11,300             4,800             4,800 
                95-D-201 Advanced test reactor radioactive                                                      
                 waste system upgrades, Idaho National                                                          
                 Engineering Laboratory, ID...............            4,800               500               500 
                93-D-200 Engineering services facilities                                                        
                 Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory,                                                                
                 Niskayuna, NY............................            3,900   ................  ................
                90-N-102 Expended core facility dry cell                                                        
                 project, Naval Reactors Facility, ID.....            3,000             8,000             8,000 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Construction..................           29,600            21,900            21,900 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Naval reactors development....          682,168           645,030           645,030 
        Program direction.................................  ................           18,902            18,902 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Total, Naval reactors...........................          682,168           663,932           663,932 
                                                           =====================================================
          Subtotal, Other defense activities..............        1,443,212         1,547,700         1,610,600 
                                                           =====================================================
    Use of prior year balances............................          -70,000   ................           -3,767 
    Fiscal year 1996 supplemental appropriations (Public                                                        
     Law 104-134).........................................           15,000   ................  ................
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.....................        1,388,212         1,547,700         1,606,833 
                                                           =====================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL:                                                                                 
    Defense nuclear waste disposal........................          248,400           200,000           200,000 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.............       10,654,458        11,049,012        11,582,645 
                                                           =====================================================
              POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS                                                                   
                                                                                                                
ALASKA POWER ADMINISTRATION:                                                                                    
    Operation and maintenance/program direction...........            4,260             4,000             4,000 
    Fiscal year 1996 Supplemental (by transfer) (Public                                                         
     Law 104-134).........................................           (5,500)  ................  ................
                                                           =====================================================
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:                                                                              
    Operation and maintenance:                                                                                  
        Operation and maintenance/program direction.......            3,472             3,989             3,989 
        Purchase power and wheeling.......................           26,430            23,456            23,456 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Operation and maintenance.............           29,902            27,445            27,445 
    Use of prior year balances............................          -10,059            -6,545           -13,586 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION............           19,843            20,900            13,859 
                                                           =====================================================
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:                                                                              
    Operation and maintenance:                                                                                  
        Operating expenses................................           20,897             2,793             2,793 
        Purchase power and wheeling.......................            1,464             1,095             1,095 
        Program direction.................................  ................           17,862            17,862 
        Construction......................................            7,931             6,054             6,054 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Operation and maintenance.............           30,292            27,804            27,804 
    Use of prior year balances............................             -514              -904            -2,594 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION............           29,778            26,900            25,210 
                                                           =====================================================
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION:                                                                              
    Operation and maintenance:                                                                                  
        Construction and rehabilitation...................           51,125            29,764            29,764 
        System operation and maintenance..................          125,255            33,453            33,453 
        Purchase power and wheeling.......................           93,709            74,235            74,235 
        Program direction.................................  ................          105,807           105,807 
        Utah mitigation and conservation..................            5,283             5,432             5,432 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Operation and maintenance.............          275,372           248,691           248,691 
    Use of prior year balances............................          -17,720           -30,800           -47,109 
    Transfer of authority from Department of Interior.....           (4,556)           (3,774)           (3,774)
    Fiscal year 1996 Supplemental (transfer out) (Public                                                        
     Law 104-134).........................................          (-5,500)  ................  ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION............          257,652           217,891           201,582 
                                                           =====================================================
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND:                                                              
    Operation and maintenance.............................            1,000               970               970 
                                                           =====================================================
      TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS..............          312,533           270,661           245,621 
                                                           =====================================================
           FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                                 
                                                                                                                
Federal energy regulatory commission......................          146,290           159,397           152,290 
Use of prior year balances (FERC).........................          -15,000   ................           -6,000 
FERC revenues.............................................         -131,290          -159,397          -146,290 
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION.........  ................  ................  ................
                                                           =====================================================
            FIXED ASSET ACQUISITIONS (SEC. 621)                                                                 
                                                                                                                
Energy Supply, Research and Development:                                                                        
    Basic sciences:                                                                                             
        96-E-300, Combustion research facility, Phase II,                                                       
         SNL/L............................................  ................           13,000   ................
General Science and Research Activities:                                                                        
    High energy physics:                                                                                        
        94-G-304, B-factory, SLAC.........................  ................           35,100   ................
        92-G-302, Fermilab main injector, Fermilab........  ................           36,750   ................
    Nuclear physics:                                                                                            
        91-G-300, Relativistic heavy ion collider, BNL....  ................          131,216   ................
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, General Science and Research                                                                
           Activities.....................................  ................          203,066   ................
                                                           =====================================================
          TOTAL, FIXED ASSET ACQUISITIONS (SEC. 621)......  ................          216,066   ................
                                                           =====================================================
                NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL FUND                                                                     
                                                                                                                
Discretionary funding.....................................          151,600           200,028           200,028 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

                    Appalachian Regional Commission

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $170,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     170,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             165,000,000

    The Appalachian Regional Commission [ARC] is a regional 
economic development agency established in 1965. It is composed 
of the Governors of the 13 Appalachian States and a Federal 
cochairman who is appointed by the President.
    The Committee recommendation for the Appalachian Regional 
Commission totals $165,000,000, a reduction of $5,000,000 below 
the budget request of fiscal year 1997. An appropriation of 
$104,000,000 is recommended for ARC highways.

                Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

                         salaries and expenses

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $17,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      17,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              17,000,000

    An appropriation of $17,000,000 is recommended for fiscal 
year 1997. This is the same as the budget request.
    The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board was created by 
the fiscal year 1989 National Defense Authorization Act. The 
Board, composed of five members appointed by the President, 
provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy 
regarding public health and safety issues at the Department's 
defense nuclear facilities. The Board is responsible for 
reviewing and evaluating the content and implementation of the 
standards relating to the design, construction, operation, and 
decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities of the Department 
of Energy.

                    Delaware River Basin Commission

                         salaries and expenses

Appropriations, 1996....................................        $343,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................         342,000

Committee recommendation

                                             ...........................

    Consistent with action taken last year on the Energy and 
Water Development Act, the Committee recommends termination of 
the Office of the U.S. Commissioner of the Delaware River Basin 
Commission. The Committee expresses its confidence in the 
ability of compact States to work cooperatively to develop 
water and related resources of the region drained by the 
Delaware River and its tributaries without the Office of the 
Federal Cochairman.

            contribution to delaware river basin commission

Appropriations, 1996....................................        $428,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................         534,000

Committee recommendation

                                                                 500,000

    An appropriation of $500,000 is recommended by the 
Committee for the fiscal year 1997 contribution to the Delaware 
River Basin Commission. This appropriation provides the Federal 
contribution to the annual expenses of the Commission.
    Due to the severe budgetary limitations, the Committee has 
recommended that the contribution to the Delaware River Basin 
Commission be held at the current year's level.

            Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin

    contribution to interstate commission on the potomac river basin

Appropriations, 1996....................................        $511,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................         508,000

Committee recommendation

                                                                 508,000

    The Committee recommendation includes $508,000 for the 
contribution to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River 
Basin. This is the same as the budget request.
    The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin was 
created by compact among the States in the basin: Maryland, 
West Virginia, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Commonwealth 
of Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia. The Commission 
has the responsibility for basinwide water quality, planning, 
program coordination, and assistance.

                     Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                         salaries and expenses

                          gross appropriation

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $468,300,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     475,300,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             471,800,000

                                revenues

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $457,300,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     457,800,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             457,300,000

                           net appropriation

Appropriations, 1996....................................     $11,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................      17,500,000

Committee recommendation

                                                              14,500,000

    The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, 
requires that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission recover 100 
percent of its budget authority, less the appropriation from 
the nuclear waste fund, by assessing licenses and annual fees. 
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $471,800,000 for 
fiscal year 1997, a reduction from both the administration's 
budget request and the fiscal year 1996 level.
    The reduction recommended by the Committee for activities 
of the NRC reflect the ongoing budgetary constraints and the 
need to restrain the growth in Government.
    The Committee also encourages the NRC to continue to give 
special attention to replacing unnecessary prescriptive 
requirements and guidance with performance-based requirements 
and guidance. The Committee believes that a performance-based 
regulatory approach can substantially improve the regulatory 
process and result in a more effective and efficient use of 
both the NRC and licensee resources.

                      Office of Inspector General

                          gross appropriation

Appropriations, 1996....................................      $5,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................       5,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                               5,000,000

                                revenues

Appropriations, 1996....................................      $5,000,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................       5,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                               5,000,000

    This appropriation provides for the Office of Inspector 
General of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Pursuant to law, 
budget authority appropriated to the inspector general must be 
recovered through the assessment of license and annual fees. 
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,000,000 for 
fiscal year 1997.

                  Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board

Appropriations, 1996....................................      $2,531,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................       3,214,000

Committee recommendation

                                                               2,531,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,531,000 for 
the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. This is the same as 
provided for the current fiscal year.
    The Committee recommendation provides continued funding for 
the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. The Nuclear Waste 
Policy Amendments Act of 1987 directed the Board to evaluate 
the technical and scientific validity of the activities of the 
Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal program. The 
Board must report its findings not less than two times a year 
to the Congress and the Secretary of Energy.

                   Susquehanna River Basin Commission

                         salaries and expenses

Appropriations, 1996....................................        $318,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................         322,000

Committee recommendation

                                             ...........................

    Consistent with action taken last year on the Energy and 
Water Development Act, the Committee recommends termination of 
the Office of the U.S. Commissioner of the Susquehanna River 
Basin Commission. The Committee expresses its confidence in the 
ability of compact States to work cooperatively to develop 
water and related resources of the region drained by the 
Susquehanna River and its tributaries without the Office of the 
Federal Cochairman.
    The Susquehanna River Basin Commission was created by 
compact under Public Law 91-575 among the States of Maryland, 
New York, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Federal 
Government. The compact enables the Commission members to 
participate jointly in the development of water and related 
resources of the region drained by the Susquehanna River and 
its tributaries.

           contribution to susquehanna river basin commission

Appropriations, 1996....................................        $250,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................         380,000

Committee recommendation

                                                                 300,000

    An appropriation of $300,000 is recommended by the 
Committee for the Federal contribution to the Susquehanna River 
Basin Commission for fiscal year 1997. This appropriation 
provides the Federal contribution of the annual expenses of the 
Commission.

                       Tennessee Valley Authority

Appropriations, 1996....................................    $109,169,000
Budget estimate, 1997...................................     120,000,000

Committee recommendation

                                                             113,000,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $113,000,000 
for the Tennessee Valley Authority. This is $7,000,000 below 
the budget request for fiscal year 1997.
    The Committee recommendation provides $72,000,000 for 
stewardship, land and water, $8,000,000 for land between the 
lakes [LBL], $9,000,000 for economic development, and 
$20,000,000 for TVA's Environmental Research Center.
    The Committee is aware of efforts by the city of Sardis, 
MS, to implement phase III of its master plan for economic 
development of the area around Sardis Lake, a reservoir 
constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide 
flood control and recreational benefits for the region. The 
Committee is also aware of the city's efforts to obtain 
appropriate grant program assistance from the Tennessee Valley 
Authority. The Committee is satisfied that grant funds provided 
to the city to implement phase III of its master plan would fit 
within the TVA's definition of economic development for such 
purposes, and it urges TVA to give strong consideration to the 
city's application.
    The Committee approves of the decision by TVA to diversify 
its power generation base by entering into a contract to 
purchase power from a lignite fuel power generating plant in 
Mississippi. Such diversification will help TVA meet its power 
generating needs for the future.
    Environmental Research Center.--The Committee directs TVA 
to continue the transition of funding to other than 
appropriations. TVA will immediately focus the research of the 
Center in those areas of greatest need for the country and 
areas that will leverage and attract funding from outside 
sources. The Committee believes that an orderly transition in 
the financing of its activities is warranted in order to 
protect the previous research investment and to allow the 
development of a solid customer base.
                      TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    The Committee recommendation includes several general 
provisions carried in previous appropriations bills.
    The Committee has included language in the act clarifying 
that funds made available by this act to the Department of 
Energy shall be used only for the purposes for which they have 
been provided and only in accordance with the Committee 
recommendations included in this report.
    In addition, the Committee has included a new general 
provision which extends current construction repayment and 
water service contracts for the Bostwick District in Kansas and 
Nebraska; and the Frenchman-Cambridge District in Nebraska. The 
Committee understands that the three 40-year contracts will 
expire on December 31, 1996, and, if not extended, will cause 
unacceptable impacts on the districts involved. The Committee 
has reluctantly included this provision with the understanding 
and expectation that comprehensive authorizing legislation will 
be enacted to address this issue. The Committee will not carry 
this provision on an annual basis if the authorizing committees 
cannot complete action to extend or renew construction 
repayment and water service contracts for these and other 
contracts which will expire in the near future.
    In addition, the Committee has included a new general 
provision regarding scientific review of the Bonneville Power 
Administration's fish and wildlife programs. The Committee 
believes that successful implementation of the Northwest Power 
Planning Council's fish and wildlife program would be benefited 
by the advice of independent scientists with expertise on the 
enhancement of Columbia River fish and wildlife. The Committee 
believes that the National Academy of Sciences is best suited 
to recommend such individuals to the council for its 
appointment, and that scientists should have expertise in 
Columbia River basin issues.
    The Bonneville Power Administration's [BPA] annual fish and 
wildlife budget for the council's program totals well over 
$100,000,000. Its purpose is to protect, mitigate, and enhance 
fish and wildlife populations along the Columbia an Snake River 
system. The Committee recognizes that the Columbia Basin Fish 
and Wildlife Authority [CBFWA] is presently responsible for 
prioritizing council program measures and making 
recommendations to the council on projects to be funded through 
BPA's annual fish and wildlife budget. CBFWA's advice is 
important. CBFWA members, however, are also the Federal and 
State fish and wildlife agencies and the tribes that 
financially benefit from the program. The Committee believes 
that independent scientific review would remove any suggestion 
of conflict of interest in prioritizing programs, and add an 
important element of scientific review to the council 
decisionmaking process.
    The bill language seeks to ensure that Northwest ratepayer 
dollars are being well spent in a cost-effective and objective 
manner. The bill language requires that the panel review 
projects to ensure that projects are funded that benefit fish 
and wildlife in the region; have a clearly defined objective 
and outcome; are based on sound science principles; and employ 
cost-effective measures. The Committee intends that the panel 
will take the recommendations of CBFWA and carefully review 
those recommendations based upon these criteria. The panel 
shall, in turn, make its own recommendations to the council on 
whether or not specific projects should be funded. If the 
council does not follow the advice of the panel, it is to 
explain in writing the basis for its decision. The Committee 
understands that ocean conditions are a contributing factor to 
the health of fish and wildlife populations in the region, and 
has directed the council to consider the impacts of ocean 
conditions in making its recommendations to BPA to fund 
projects. The bill language expressly state the council, after 
review of CBFWA and panel recommendations, has the authority to 
make final recommendations to BPA on project(s) to be funded 
through BPA's annual fish and wildlife budget.

  COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on 
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment 
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation 
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing 
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously 
passed by the Senate during that session.''
    The recommended appropriations in title III, Department of 
Energy, generally are subject to annual authorization. However, 
the Congress has not enacted an annual Department of Energy 
authorization bill for several years, with the exception of the 
programs funded within the atomic energy defense activities 
which are authorized in annual defense authorization acts. The 
authorization for the atomic energy defense activities, 
contained in the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal 
Year 1997, has passed the Senate.
    Also, contained in title III, Department of Energy, in 
connection with the appropriation under the heading ``Nuclear 
Waste Disposal Fund,'' the recommended item of appropriation is 
brought to the attention of the Senate.
    In title IV, independent agencies, the recommended 
appropriation for the Appalachian Regional Commission is 
$165,000,000.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, the accompanying 
bill was ordered reported from the Committee, subject to 
amendment and subject to the subcommittee allocation, by 
recorded vote of 28-0.
        Yeas                          Nays
Chairman Hatfield
Mr. Stevens
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Specter
Mr. Domenici
Mr. Bond
Mr. Gorton
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Mack
Mr. Burns
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Jeffords
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mr. Campbell
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Inouye
Mr. Hollings
Mr. Johnston
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Bumpers
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Reid
Mr. Kerrey
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray

 COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports 
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute 
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or 
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a 
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution 
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof 
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and 
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical 
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the 
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by 
the committee.''
    In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law 
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing 
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is 
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is 
proposed is shown in roman.

    Section 101 amends section 401(a) of Public Law 99-662 as 
follows:

                        TITLE IV--FLOOD CONTROL

SEC. 401. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS.

    (a) Authorization of Construction.--The following works of 
improvement for the control of destructive floodwaters are 
adopted and authorized to be prosecuted by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans and subject to the 
conditions recommended in the respective reports designated in 
this subsection, except as otherwise provided in this 
subsection:
          * * * * * * *


                         arkansas city, kansas


    The project for flood control, Arkansas City, Kansas: 
Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 9, 1985, at a 
total cost of [$14,500,000] $38,500,000, with an estimated 
first Federal cost of [$10,880,000] $19,250,000, and an 
estimated first non-Federal cost of [$3,620,000] $19,250,000.

    Section 103 amends section 101(a)(25) of Public Law 101-640 
as follows:

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Report of the Chief of Engineers.--Except 
as provided in this subsection, the following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes 
are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially 
in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, 
recommended in the respective reports designated in this 
subsection:
          * * * * * * *
    (25) Moorefield, west virginia.--The project for flood 
control, Moorefield, West Virginia: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers, dated July 23, 1990, at a total cost of 
[$16,260,000] $26,200,000, with an estimated first Federal cost 
of [$11,675,000] $20,300,000 and an estimated first non-Federal 
cost of [$4,585,000] $5,900,000.

    Section 104 amends section 301(a)(25) of Public Law 99-662 
as follows:

            TITLE III--INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS.

    (a) Authorization of Construction.-- The following works of 
improvement for the benefit of navigation are authorized to be 
prosecuted by the Secretary substantially in accordance with 
the plans and subject to the conditions recommended in the 
respective reports designated in this subsection, except as 
otherwise provided in this subsection:
          * * * * * * *


      lock and dam 7 replacement, monongahela river, pennsylvania


    The project for navigation, lock and dam 7 replacement, 
Monongahela River, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of 
Engineers, dated September 24, 1984, with such modifications 
(including acquisition of lands for fish and wildlife 
mitigation) as the Secretary determines are advisable, at a 
total cost of [$123,000,000] $181,000,000, with a first Federal 
cost of [$123,000,000] $181,000,000.

    The proviso under ``Construction Program'' of title II, 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation amends 
section 301 of Public Law 102-250 as follows:

            TITLE III--GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in section 303 of this act 
(relating to temperature control devices at Shasta Dam, 
California), there is authorized to be appropriated not more 
than $90,000,000 in total for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 
1995, [and 1996] 1996, and 1997.

    Section 504 of title V amends the Northwest Power Planning 
and Conservation Act, Public Law 96-501, by adding the 
following:

    ``(4)(g)(4) Independent Scientific Review Panel.--(i) The 
Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) shall appoint an 
Independent Scientific Review Panel (Panel), which shall be 
comprised of five members, to review projects proposed to be 
funded through that portion of the Bonneville Power 
Administration's (BPA) annual fish and wildlife budget that 
implements the Council's annual fish and wildlife program. 
Members shall be appointed from a list submitted by the 
National Academy of Sciences, provided that Pacific Northwest 
scientists with expertise in Columbia river anadramous and 
nonanadramous fish and wildlife and ocean experts shall be 
represented on the Panel. The Council shall appoint members to 
the Panel that do not have a financial interest in the projects 
to be reviewed, other than any compensation that may be 
provided for performing its functions on the Panel. Panel 
employees may be compensated and shall be considered as special 
government employees subject to 45 CFR 684.10 through 684.22.
    ``(ii) The Panel shall review projects proposed to be 
funded through BPA's annual fish and wildlife budget and make 
recommendations on matters related to each project to the 
Council. Project recommendations shall be based on a 
determination that each project: is based on sound science 
principles; benefits fish and wildlife; has a clearly defined 
objective and outcome with provisions for monitoring and 
evaluation of results; and employs cost-effective measures to 
achieve its objective. The Panel shall review, on an annual 
basis, prior year expenditures based upon these criteria and 
submit its findings to the Council for its review.
    ``(iii) The Council shall fully consider the findings of 
the Panel when making its final recommendations for projects to 
be funded through BPA's annual fish and wildlife budget, and if 
the Council does not incorporate a recommendation of the Panel, 
the Council shall explain in writing its reasons for not 
accepting the Panel's recommendations. The Council shall also 
take into consideration the impact of ocean conditions on fish 
and wildlife populations in making its recommendations to the 
BPA. The Council, after consideration of the recommendations of 
the Panel and other entities, shall be responsible for making 
the final recommendations of projects to be funded through 
BPA's annual fish and wildlife budget.''.

                                            BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL                                            
  PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS  
                                                     AMENDED                                                    
                                            [In millions of dollars]                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Budget authority               Outlays        
                                                             ---------------------------------------------------
                                                               Committee    Amount  of   Committee    Amount  of
                                                               allocation      bill      allocation      bill   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations                                                    
 to its subcommittees of amounts in the First Concurrent                                                        
 Resolution for 1997: Subcommittee on Energy and Water                                                          
 Development:                                                                                                   
    Defense discretionary...................................       11,600       11,600       11,233   \1\ 10,928
    Nondefense discretionary................................        8,708        8,708        8,969        8,956
    Violent crime reduction fund............................  ...........  ...........  ...........  ...........
    Mandatory...............................................  ...........  ...........  ...........  ...........
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:                                                      
    1997....................................................  ...........  ...........  ...........   \2\ 13,051
    1998....................................................  ...........  ...........  ...........        5,929
    1999....................................................  ...........  ...........  ...........          861
    2000....................................................  ...........  ...........  ...........           74
    2001 and future year....................................  ...........  ...........  ...........           51
Financial assistance to State and local governments for 1997                                                    
 in bill....................................................           NA          160           NA            7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.                                                          
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.                                                          
                                                                                                                
NA: Not applicable.                                                                                             


  COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL 
                                                                        YEAR 1997                                                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                       Senate Committee recommendation  
                                                                                                                           compared with (+ or -)       
                           Item                                   1996         Budget estimate       Committee     -------------------------------------
                                                             appropriation                         recommendation          1996                         
                                                                                                                      appropriation     Budget estimate 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                                        
          TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                        
                  DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                                        
                Corps of Engineers--Civil                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                        
General investigations...................................      $121,767,000       $142,500,000       $154,557,000       +$32,790,000       +$12,057,000 
Construction, general....................................       804,573,000        914,000,000      1,024,195,000       +219,622,000       +110,195,000 
Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries,                                                                                                       
 Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi,                                                                                                  
 Missouri, and Tennessee.................................       307,885,000        292,500,000        312,513,000         +4,628,000        +20,013,000 
Operation and maintenance, general.......................     1,703,697,000      1,663,000,000      1,700,358,000         -1,339,000        +37,358,000 
    Emergency appropriations (Public Law 104-134)........        30,000,000   .................  .................       -30,000,000   .................
Regulatory program.......................................       101,000,000        112,000,000        101,000,000   .................       -11,000,000 
Flood control and coastal emergencies....................        10,000,000         15,000,000         10,000,000   .................        -5,000,000 
    Emergency appropriations (Public Law 104-134)........       135,000,000   .................  .................      -135,000,000   .................
General expenses.........................................       151,500,000        153,000,000        153,000,000         +1,500,000   .................
Oil spill research.......................................           850,000            850,000   .................          -850,000           -850,000 
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil.......     3,366,272,000      3,292,850,000      3,455,623,000        +89,351,000       +162,773,000 
                                                          ==============================================================================================
           TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                        
         Central Utah Project Completion Account                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
Central Utah project construction........................        18,905,000         25,827,000         25,827,000         +6,922,000   .................
Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation and                                                                                                           
 conservation............................................        18,503,000         11,700,000         11,700,000         -6,803,000   .................
Utah reclamation mitigation and conservation account.....         5,485,000          5,000,000          5,000,000           -485,000   .................
Program oversight and administration.....................         1,246,000          1,100,000          1,100,000           -146,000   .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Central Utah project completion account.....        44,139,000         43,627,000         43,627,000           -512,000   .................
                                                                                                                                                        
                  Bureau of Reclamation                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                        
General investigations...................................        12,684,000         15,095,000         18,105,000         +5,421,000         +3,010,000 
Construction program.....................................       411,046,000        392,524,000        410,494,000           -552,000        +17,970,000 
    Emergency appropriations (Public Law 104-134)........         9,000,000   .................  .................        -9,000,000   .................
Operation and maintenance................................       273,076,000        292,876,000        280,876,000         +7,800,000        -12,000,000 
Loan program.............................................        11,668,000         12,715,000         12,715,000         +1,047,000   .................
    (Limitation on direct loans).........................       (37,000,000)       (37,000,000)       (37,000,000)  .................  .................
General administrative expenses..........................        48,150,000         48,971,000         48,971,000           +821,000   .................
Colorado River Dam fund (by transfer, permanent                                                                                                         
 authority)..............................................       (-4,556,000)       (-3,774,000)       (-3,774,000)         (+782,000)  .................
Central Valley project restoration fund..................        43,579,000         38,000,000         38,000,000         -5,579,000   .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Bureau of Reclamation.......................       809,203,000        800,181,000        809,161,000            -42,000         +8,980,000 
                                                          ==============================================================================================
      Total, title II, Department of the Interior........       853,342,000        843,808,000        852,788,000           -554,000         +8,980,000 
          (By transfer)..................................       (-4,556,000)       (-3,774,000)       (-3,774,000)         (+782,000)  .................
                                                          ==============================================================================================
             TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                        
Energy Supply, Research and Development Activities.......     2,727,407,000      3,020,497,000      2,749,043,000        +21,636,000       -271,454,000 
Uranium Supply and Enrichment Activities.................        64,197,000         70,000,000         42,200,000        -21,997,000        -27,800,000 
    Gross revenues.......................................       -34,903,000        -42,200,000        -42,200,000         -7,297,000   .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Net appropriation..................................        29,294,000         27,800,000   .................       -29,294,000        -27,800,000 
Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning                                                                                                  
 fund....................................................       278,807,000        240,200,000        220,200,000        -58,607,000        -20,000,000 
General Science and Research Activities..................       981,000,000      1,009,150,000      1,000,626,000        +19,626,000         -8,524,000 
Nuclear Waste Disposal Fund..............................       151,600,000        200,028,000        200,028,000        +48,428,000   .................
Departmental Administration..............................       366,697,000        244,863,000        218,017,000       -148,680,000        -26,846,000 
    Miscellaneous revenues...............................      -122,306,000       -125,388,000       -125,388,000         -3,082,000   .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Net appropriation..................................       244,391,000        119,475,000         92,629,000       -151,762,000        -26,846,000 
Office of the Inspector General..........................        25,000,000         29,605,000         23,103,000         -1,897,000         -6,502,000 
Environmental Restoration and Waste Management:                                                                                                         
    Defense function.....................................    (5,557,532,000)    (5,591,310,000)    (5,543,810,000)      (-13,722,000)      (-47,500,000)
    Non-defense function.................................      (900,348,000)      (891,614,000)      (822,346,000)      (-78,002,000)      (-69,268,000)
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total..............................................    (6,457,880,000)    (6,482,924,000)    (6,366,156,000)      (-91,724,000)     (-116,768,000)
                                                                                                                                                        
             Atomic Energy Defense Activities                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                                        
Weapons Activities.......................................     3,460,314,000      3,710,002,000      3,978,602,000       +518,288,000       +268,600,000 
Defense Environmental Restoration and Waste Management...     5,557,532,000      5,409,310,000      5,615,210,000        +57,678,000       +205,900,000 
Fixed asset acquisitions (sec. 621)......................  .................       182,000,000        182,000,000       +182,000,000   .................
Other Defense Activities.................................     1,388,212,000      1,547,700,000      1,606,833,000       +218,621,000        +59,133,000 
Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal...........................       248,400,000        200,000,000        200,000,000        -48,400,000   .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities............    10,654,458,000     11,049,012,000     11,582,645,000       +928,187,000       +533,633,000 
                                                                                                                                                        
             Power Marketing Administrations                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                        
Operation and maintenance, Alaska Power Administration...         4,260,000          4,000,000          4,000,000           -260,000   .................
    (By transfer)........................................        (5,500,000)  .................  .................       (-5,500,000)  .................
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power                                                                                                           
 Administration..........................................        19,843,000         20,900,000         13,859,000         -5,984,000         -7,041,000 
Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power                                                                                                           
 Administration..........................................        29,778,000         26,900,000         25,210,000         -4,568,000         -1,690,000 
Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance,                                                                                                
 Western Area Power Administration.......................       257,652,000        217,891,000        201,582,000        -56,070,000        -16,309,000 
    (Transfer out).......................................       (-5,500,000)  .................  .................       (+5,500,000)  .................
    (By transfer, permanent authority)...................        (4,556,000)        (3,774,000)        (3,774,000)         (-782,000)  .................
    Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund....         1,000,000            970,000            970,000            -30,000   .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Power Marketing Administrations.............       312,533,000        270,661,000        245,621,000        -66,912,000        -25,040,000 
                                                                                                                                                        
           Federal Energy Regulatory Commission                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                        
Salaries and expenses....................................       131,290,000        159,397,000        146,290,000        +15,000,000        -13,107,000 
    Revenues applied.....................................      -131,290,000       -159,397,000       -146,290,000        -15,000,000        +13,107,000 
Fixed asset acquisitions (sec. 621)......................  .................       216,066,000   .................  .................      -216,066,000 
                                                          ==============================================================================================
      Total, title III, Department of Energy.............    15,404,490,000     16,182,494,000     16,113,895,000       +709,405,000        -68,599,000 
          (By transfer)..................................       (10,056,000)        (3,774,000)        (3,774,000)       (-6,282,000)  .................
                                                          ==============================================================================================
              TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                        
Appalachian Regional Commission..........................       170,000,000        170,000,000        165,000,000         -5,000,000         -5,000,000 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board..................        17,000,000         17,000,000         17,000,000   .................  .................
Delaware River Basin Commission:                                                                                                                        
    Salaries and expenses................................           343,000            342,000   .................          -343,000           -342,000 
    Contribution to Delaware River Basin Commission......           428,000            534,000            500,000            +72,000            -34,000 
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total..............................................           771,000            876,000            500,000           -271,000           -376,000 
Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin:                                                                                                       
    Contribution to Interstate Commission on the Potomac                                                                                                
     River Basin.........................................           511,000            508,000            508,000             -3,000   .................
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:                                                                                                                          
    Salaries and expenses................................       468,300,000        475,300,000        471,800,000         +3,500,000         -3,500,000 
    Revenues.............................................      -457,300,000       -457,800,000       -457,300,000   .................          +500,000 
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...........................................        11,000,000         17,500,000         14,500,000         +3,500,000         -3,000,000 
    Office of Inspector General..........................         5,000,000          5,000,000          5,000,000   .................  .................
    Revenues.............................................        -5,000,000         -5,000,000         -5,000,000   .................  .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal...........................................  .................  .................  .................  .................  .................
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total..............................................        11,000,000         17,500,000         14,500,000         +3,500,000         -3,000,000 
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.....................         2,531,000          3,214,000          2,531,000   .................          -683,000 
Susquehanna River Basin Commission:                                                                                                                     
    Salaries and expenses................................           318,000            322,000   .................          -318,000           -322,000 
    Contribution to Susquehanna River Basin Commission...           250,000            380,000            300,000            +50,000            -80,000 
                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total..............................................           568,000            702,000            300,000           -268,000           -402,000 
Tennessee Valley Authority: Tennessee Valley Authority                                                                                                  
 Fund....................................................       109,169,000        120,000,000        113,000,000         +3,831,000         -7,000,000 
                                                          ==============================================================================================
      Total, title IV, Independent agencies..............       311,550,000        329,800,000        313,339,000         +1,789,000        -16,461,000 
                                                          ==============================================================================================
      Grand total:                                                                                                                                      
          New budget (obligational) authority............    19,935,654,000     20,648,952,000     20,735,645,000       +799,991,000        +86,693,000 
          (By transfer)..................................        (5,500,000)  .................  .................       (-5,500,000)  .................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



