[House Report 104-511]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



104th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 2d Session                                                     104-511
_______________________________________________________________________


 
      EXTENSION OF FEDERAL POWER ACT DEADLINE FOR PROJECT IN OHIO

                                _______


 March 28, 1996.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________


  Mr. Bliley, from the Committee on Commerce, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 2816]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

    The Committee on Commerce, to whom was referred the bill 
(H.R. 2816) to reinstate the license for, and extend the 
deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
construction of, a hydroelectric project in Ohio, and for other 
purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon 
without amendment and recommend that the bill do pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Purpose and Summary..............................................     1
Background and Need for Legislation..............................     2
Hearings.........................................................     3
Committee Consideration..........................................     3
Rollcall Votes...................................................     3
Committee Oversight Findings.....................................     3
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.....................     3
New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures........................     3
Committee Cost Estimate..........................................     4
Congressional Budget Office Estimate.............................     4
Inflationary Impact Statement....................................     4
Advisory Committee Statement.....................................     4
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation...................     5
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............     5

                          purpose and summary

    The purpose of H.R. 2816 is to extend the deadline for the 
commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project in the 
State of Ohio licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (FERC) until September 24, 1999.

                  background and need for legislation

    Section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 806 
(1988)) establishes time limits for commencement of 
construction of a hydroelectric project once FERC has issued a 
license. The licensee must begin construction not more than two 
years from the date the license is issued, unless FERC extends 
the initial deadline. However, section 13 permits FERC to grant 
only one extension of that deadline for ``not longer than two 
additional years * * * when not incompatible with the public 
interests.'' Accordingly, FERC lacks authority to extend the 
deadline beyond a maximum of two years from the original 
deadline for commencement of construction. Therefore, a license 
is subject to termination if a licensee fails to begin 
construction within four years of the date the license is 
issued.
    Lack of a power sales contract is the main reason 
construction of licensed hydroelectric projects has not 
commenced. It is very difficult for a hydroelectric project 
sponsor to secure financing until it has been granted a 
license, and once it has been granted a license the 
construction deadline begins to run. Without a power sales 
contract, a project generally cannot be financed. There are 
other obstacles to commencement of construction, such as 
protracted proceedings on a licensee's application for a dredge 
and fill permit from the Army Corps of Engineers under section 
404 of the Clean Water Act. FERC has testified that in such 
cases it has issued orders staying the license until matters 
are resolved, suggesting that extension legislation is not 
needed in order to address delays beyond the control of the 
licensee. However, this does not apply to delays that are 
subject to the control of the licensee, such as lack of a power 
sales contract.
    One reason it is difficult for project sponsors to obtain 
power sales contracts is the changing nature of the electric 
industry in the United States. As the industry has become more 
competitive, utilities are seeking to lower their costs and 
increase their flexibility. The terms of power sales contracts 
that finance hydroelectric projects range up to 25 to 30 years, 
and utilities are trying to avoid purchase agreements with long 
terms. In addition, the generating cost of these projects may 
not be as favorable as other alternatives.
    H.R. 2816 would extend the deadline for the commencement of 
construction for a 49.5 megawatt hydroelectric project (Project 
No. 3218) until September 24, 1999. This would extend the 
deadline to up to ten years after the date the license was 
issued. The deadline for commencement of construction for 
Project No. 3218 expired on April 15, 1993. The licensee did 
not seek an extension of the construction period, applied to 
FERC to surrender its license, and the agency accepted 
surrender on September 20, 1993. The licensee had invested 
about $500,000 in project development. H.R. 2816 does not ease 
the requirements of a hydroelectric license, but merely extends 
the period for commencement of project construction.

                                hearings

    The Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a hearing on the 
general subject of legislative extensions of hydroelectric 
construction deadlines, as well as specific bills to extend the 
deadline for individual projects on October 18, 1995. Testimony 
was received from Ms. Susan Tomasky, General Counsel, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission. There were no legislative 
hearings held on H.R. 2816, which was introduced after the 
hearing, but written comments on the bill were provided by 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chair Elizabeth A. Moler 
in a letter to the Subcommittee dated February 27, 1996.

                        committee consideration

    The Subcommittee on Energy and Power met in open markup 
session on March 5, 1996, and approved H.R. 2816, without 
amendment, for Full Committee consideration by a voice vote, a 
quorum being present. The Full Committee met in open markup 
session on March 13, 1996, and ordered H.R. 2816 reported to 
the House, without amendment, by a voice vote, a quorum being 
present.

                             rollcall votes

    Clause 2(l)(2)(B) of rule XI of the Rules of the House 
requires the Committee to list the recorded votes on the motion 
to report legislation and on amendments thereto. There were no 
recorded votes taken in connection with ordering H.R. 2816 
reported. A motion by Mr. Bliley to order H.R. 2816 reported to 
the House, without amendment, was agreed to by a voice vote.

                      committee oversight findings

    Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(A) of rule XI of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the Subcommittee on Energy and 
Power did not hold a legislative hearing on H.R. 2816. The 
Subcommittee held a legislative hearing on similar bills on 
October 18, 1995, received written comments on H.R. 2816 from 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in a letter to the 
Subcommittee dated February 27, 1996, and made findings that 
are reflected in this report.

              committee on government reform and oversight

    Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(D) of rule XI of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, no oversight findings have been 
submitted to the Committee by the Committee on Government 
Reform and Oversight.

               new Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures

    In compliance with clause 2(l)(3)(B) of rule XI of the 
Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee states 
that H.R. 2816 would result in no new or increased budget 
authority or tax expenditures or revenue.

                        committee cost estimate

    The Committee adopts as its own the cost estimate prepared 
by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to 
section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

                  congressional budget office estimate

    Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(C) of rule XI of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the following is the cost 
estimate provided by the Congressional Budget Office pursuant 
to section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974:

                                     U.S. Congress,
                               Congressional Budget Office,
                                    Washington, DC, March 18, 1996.
Hon. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr.,
Chairman, Committee on Commerce,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office has 
reviewed H.R. 2816, a bill to reinstate the license for, and 
extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to 
the construction of, a hydroelectric project in Ohio, and for 
other purposes, as ordered reported by the House Committee on 
Commerce on March 13, 1996. CBO estimates that enacting the 
bill would have no net effect on the federal budget. The bill 
does not contain any intergovernmental or private sector 
mandates, and would have no direct budgetary impact on state, 
local, or tribal governments.
    The bill would reinstate the license for, and extend the 
deadline for construction of a hydroelectric project currently 
subject to licensing by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (FERC). These provisions may have a minor impact on 
FERC's workload. Because FERC recovers 100 percent of its costs 
through user fees, any change in its administrative costs would 
be offset by an equal change in the fees that the commission 
charges. Hence, the bill's provisions would have no net 
budgetary impact.
    Because FERC's administrative costs are limited in annual 
appropriations, enactment of this bill would not affect direct 
spending or receipts. Therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would 
not apply to the bill.
    If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be 
pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Kim Cawley.
            Sincerely,
                                         June E. O'Neill, Director.

                     Inflationary Impact Statement

    Pursuant to clause 2(l)(4) of rule XI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the Committee finds that H.R. 2816 
would have no inflationary impact.

                      Advisory Committee Statement

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act are created by this 
legislation.

             Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation

Section 1. Reinstatement of license and extension deadline

    This section directs FERC, upon the request of the licensee 
for Project No. 3218, to reinstate the license effective 
September 25, 1993, and extend the time required for 
commencement of construction for such project until September 
24, 1999.

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

    In compliance with clause 3 of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the Committee finds that no 
changes in existing law are made by H.R. 2816.