[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 163 (2017), Part 7]
[House]
[Pages 9177-9186]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                            VERIFY FIRST ACT

  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 378, I 
call up the bill (H.R. 2581) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
to require the provision of social security numbers as a condition of 
receiving the health insurance premium tax credit, and ask for its 
immediate consideration.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Mitchell). Pursuant to House Resolution 
378, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Ways and Means, printed in the bill, shall be considered 
as adopted, and the bill, as amended, is considered read.
  The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:

                               H.R. 2581

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Verify First Act''.

     SEC. 2. VERIFICATION OF STATUS IN UNITED STATES AS CONDITION 
                   OF RECEIVING ADVANCE PAYMENT OF HEALTH 
                   INSURANCE PREMIUM TAX CREDIT.

       (a) Application to Current Health Insurance Premium Tax 
     Credit.--Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 
     in effect for months beginning before January 1, 2020, is 
     amended by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h) and 
     by inserting after subsection (f) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(g) Verification of Status in United States for Advance 
     Payment.--No advance payment of the credit allowed under this 
     section with respect to any premium under subsection 
     (b)(2)(A) with respect to any individual shall be made under 
     section 1412 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
     Act unless the Secretary has received confirmation from the 
     Secretary of Health and Human Services that the Commissioner 
     of Social Security or the Secretary of Homeland Security has 
     verified under section 1411(c)(2) of such Act the 
     individual's status as a citizen or national of the United 
     States or an alien lawfully present in the United States 
     using a process that includes the appropriate use of 
     information related to citizenship or immigration status, 
     such as social security account numbers (but not individual 
     taxpayer identification numbers).''.
       (b) Application to New Health Insurance Premium Tax 
     Credit.--Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 
     amended by the American Health Care Act of 2017 and in effect 
     for months beginning after December 31, 2019, is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(h) Verification of Status in United States for Advance 
     Payment.--No advance payment of the credit allowed under this 
     section with respect to any amount under subparagraph (A) or 
     (B) of subsection (b)(1) with respect to any individual shall 
     be made under section 1412 of the Patient Protection and 
     Affordable Care Act unless the Secretary has received 
     confirmation from the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
     that the Commissioner of Social Security or the Secretary of 
     Homeland Security has verified under section 1411(c)(2) of 
     such Act the individual's status as a citizen or national of 
     the United States or a qualified alien (within the meaning of 
     section 431 of the Personal Responsibility and Work 
     Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1641)) using 
     a process that includes the appropriate use of information 
     related to citizenship or immigration status, such as social 
     security account numbers (but not individual taxpayer 
     identification numbers).''.
       (c) Conforming Amendment on Continuous Health Insurance 
     Coverage Provision.--Section 2710A(b)(1) of the Public Health 
     Service Act, as added by section 133 of the American Health 
     Care Act of 2017, is amended by adding after subparagraph (C) 
     the following:
     ``In the case of an individual who applies for advance 
     payment of a credit under section 1412 of the Patient 
     Protection and Affordable Care Act and for whom a 
     determination of eligibility for such advance payment is 
     delayed by reason of the requirement for verification of the 
     individual's status in the United States under section 
     1411(c)(2) of such Act, the period of days beginning with the 
     date of application for advance payment and ending with the 
     date of such verification shall not be taken into account in 
     applying subparagraph (B). The Secretary shall establish a 
     procedure by which information relating to this period is 
     provided to the individual.''.
       (d) Delay Permitted in Coverage Date in Case of Delay in 
     Verification of Status for Individuals Applying for Advance 
     Payment of Credit.--Section 1411(e) of the Patient Protection 
     and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18081(e)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting after ``applicant's 
     eligibility'' the following: ``(other than eligibility for 
     advance payment of a credit under section 1412)''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(5) Delay permitted in coverage date in case of delay in 
     verification of status for individuals applying for advance 
     payment of credit.--In the case of an individual whose 
     eligibility for advance payments is delayed by reason of the 
     requirement for verification under subsection (c)(2), if, for 
     coverage to be effective as of the date requested in the 
     individual's application for enrollment, the individual would 
     (but for this paragraph) be required to pay 2 or more months 
     of retroactive premiums, the individual shall be provided the 
     option to elect to postpone the effective date of coverage to 
     the date that is not more than 1 month later than the date 
     requested in the individual's application for enrollment.''.
       (e) Effective Dates.--
       (1) Application to current health insurance premium tax 
     credit.--The amendment made by subsection (a) is contingent 
     upon the enactment of the American Health Care Act of 2017 
     and shall apply (if at all) to months beginning after 
     December 31, 2017.

[[Page 9178]]

       (2) Application to new health insurance premium tax 
     credit.--The amendment made by subsection (b) is contingent 
     upon the enactment of the American Health Care Act of 2017 
     and shall apply (if at all) to months beginning after 
     December 31, 2019, in taxable years ending after such date.
       (3) Conforming amendment on continuous health insurance 
     coverage provision.--The amendment made by subsection (c) is 
     contingent upon the enactment of the American Health Care Act 
     of 2017 and shall take effect (if at all) as if included in 
     such Act.
       (4) Flexibility in coverage date in case of delay in 
     verification of status.--The amendment made by subsection (d) 
     is contingent upon the enactment of the American Health Care 
     Act of 2017 and shall apply (if at all) to applications for 
     advance payments for months beginning after December 31, 
     2017.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Texas (Mr. Brady) and the 
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Sanchez) each will control 30 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.


                             General Leave

  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all 
Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend 
their remarks and include extraneous material on the bill currently 
under consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself as much time as I may 
consume.
  Last month House Republicans took a significant step to return 
patient-centered healthcare to the American people. We passed the 
American Health Care Act. The American Health Care Act begins our step-
by-step process to repeal ObamaCare and replace this collapsing law 
with a 21st century healthcare system that truly works for American 
families, job creators, our States, and our taxpayers.
  Now, as work on the American Health Care Act moves forward in the 
Senate, we are moving forward on a parallel track to deliver more 
solutions for the American people. One of those is the Verify First 
Act, sponsored by Congressman Lou Barletta of Pennsylvania.
  This legislation takes important action to protect taxpayer dollars 
from waste, fraud, and abuse. It prevents the American Health Care 
Act's monthly tax credits and ObamaCare's current subsidies from being 
dispensed until the legal status of an eligible recipient can be 
verified.
  Under ObamaCare, people who are in the United States illegally are 
prohibited from receiving taxpayer-funded subsidies to help purchase 
health insurance; but like so many aspects of ObamaCare, there is a 
major defect. ObamaCare starts by assuming a person is a legal resident 
and sends the money right away even if the verification process is 
still incomplete.
  As we have seen with so many Federal programs, it is all but 
impossible to get fraudulently claimed money back after it is already 
out the door. This flaw of ObamaCare is no different. It has resulted 
in taxpayer-funded subsidies being spent on people who are not in the 
United States legally and, therefore, not eligible to receive them.
  My constituents in Texas and yours around the country work too hard 
to see their tax dollars wasted by Washington's carelessness. The best 
solution to protect taxpayer dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse is to 
stop it before it occurs, and that is what the Verify First Act by Mr. 
Barletta will do.
  This bill strengthens existing verification tools by making a 
commonsense change. Rather than sending the money first and confirming 
legal status later, it verifies legal status up front. So if you want 
to receive financial support for health insurance, this bill simply 
requires that you first provide a Social Security number or another 
form of acceptable information to validate citizenship or immigration 
status.
  This commonsense change will apply to ObamaCare beginning with next 
year's open enrollment period, and after ObamaCare is repealed, it will 
apply to the tax credits offered in the American Health Care Act when 
they take effect. This helps ensure that taxpayer-funded assistance for 
the purchase of health insurance is only distributed to people who are 
eligible, not to those who are in our country illegally.
  I want to thank Congressman Barletta for his leadership on this 
important legislation. The Verify First Act is a much-needed solution 
to safeguard taxpayer dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse both now and 
in the future, and that is crucial as we continue our efforts to repeal 
and replace the failing ObamaCare law. It is vital to improving 
America's health system for the long term.
  I urge all my colleagues to join me in supporting the passage of the 
Verify First Act, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I can't believe we are here today attempting to pass 
such a blatantly discriminatory bill. Under the guise of fighting 
fraud, Republicans are attempting to pass a bill that will put 
additional barriers to care for all Americans--all this in exchange for 
one Member's vote for TrumpCare, which guts healthcare for 23 million 
Americans, and the Republicans barely passed that bill out of the 
House.
  This bill fails to recognize the diversity of American families; 
instead, it forces a single approach for all those who need financial 
help to get the care that they need.
  I don't know if everyone on the other side of the aisle knows this, 
but there are already measures in place to prevent advanced premium tax 
credits from going to ineligible people. There is already a mechanism 
in place for Treasury to reconcile tax credits, and any undocumented 
individual found to have received a subsidy must repay them in full.
  The other side will also try to make the argument that this measure 
will help fight fraud in the healthcare system, that there is somehow 
overwhelming amounts of evidence that immigrants are the main 
perpetrators of fraud. Beneficiaries struggling to access care are not 
the perpetrators of fraud. These are good people trying to do right by 
their families and by their country.
  Of course, my colleagues over there are going to cite a Senate 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs report, written 
by a Republican majority, that found, ``a half a million illegal 
immigrants received $750 million in healthcare subsidies.''
  Well, I have that report right here in my hand, and nowhere does it 
say that 500,000 undocumented immigrants received millions of dollars 
in healthcare subsidies, as Mr. Barletta's press release claims. What 
the report says is 500,000 individuals, and not 500,000 undocumented 
individuals or any other term that Republicans like to use to disparage 
immigrants.

                              {time}  1345

  There is no evidence to suggest that immigrants without authorization 
to be here would take the risk of signing on to a government website to 
fraudulently get healthcare coverage.
  So what are the unintended consequences of this bill?
  I hate to break it to my colleagues, but the people most impacted are 
U.S. citizens who were born abroad or naturalized, not undocumented 
individuals.
  This bill is yet another example that the Republican majority will do 
anything to demonize even the smallest subsection of immigrants in 
order to gut healthcare for Americans and get their billionaire buddies 
a big, fat tax break. Whether that means sowing fear in communities by 
raiding homes in order to hunt people down or denying access to care 
for legal immigrants who are entitled to care, no excuse is too 
ridiculous for Republicans to attack the immigrant community.
  Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record a letter signed by 226 
organizations in opposition to H.R. 2581.

                                                    June 12, 2017.
       Dear Member of Congress: As national, state, and local 
     organizations concerned about immigrant rights or access to 
     affordable health care, we are writing to strongly urge you 
     to VOTE NO on HR 2581, the ``Verify First'' Act. This bill is 
     an attack on people's ability to see a doctor and on 
     immigrants and people of color. It is not the ``common 
     sense'' taxpayer protection bill that its supporters would 
     have you believe.

[[Page 9179]]

       HR 2581 is a dangerous bill that puts up roadblocks for 
     both citizens and immigrants to obtain timely, affordable 
     health insurance. It would strip away provisions that provide 
     for a person to obtain subsidies for enrollment in an 
     Affordable Care Act (or the contemplated American Health Care 
     Act) plan while they work with Department of Health and Human 
     Services to verify their U.S. citizenship or immigration 
     status. The people most impacted are U.S. citizens who were 
     born abroad or naturalized. The bill also affects many 
     immigrants, especially those newly arrived or certain victims 
     of domestic violence and trafficking survivors.
       The fact is that when individuals are not able to 
     immediately verify their citizenship or immigration status on 
     an Affordable Care Act Marketplace, it begins an often months 
     long, strenuous process of sending in documents that must be 
     physically inspected. Health care assisters routinely say 
     these clients are the hardest cases they work on because the 
     process for verifying citizenship and immigration status is a 
     time-consuming exercise in dealing with inefficient 
     government processes.
       Rather than protect American taxpayers, HR 2581 would strip 
     from American taxpayers important protections that are needed 
     to overcome deficiencies in federal government databases. 
     Immigrants who are not lawfully present are categorically 
     barred from enrollment in health insurance on the Affordable 
     Care Act marketplaces, and for the subsidies that make that 
     insurance affordable. Moreover, safeguards protecting 
     taxpayers are already built into the ACA; individuals whose 
     citizenship or immigration status cannot be verified already 
     are required to pay back all of their subsidies when they 
     file their taxes and ``reconcile'' their premium tax credits.
       Supporters of this bill cite a sloppy Senate Homeland 
     Security and Government Affairs Committee report that arrived 
     at a made-up number of supposed ``fraud.'' It's just not 
     true. The committee assumed that every person who lost 
     coverage for failure to verify their citizenship and 
     immigration status was undocumented. In the experience of our 
     organizations and organizations we work with, this is false. 
     These reports describe the first year of the marketplaces, 
     and it is well documented that system outages and 
     understaffing, among other technical problems, contributed to 
     the federal Marketplace's failure to verify consumers' status 
     promptly. The Department of Health and Human Services 
     Inspector General reported in 2014 that a cause of the delay 
     in verification was the agency's lack of prioritization of 
     this issue.
       Despite huge gains since then, problems still persist. The 
     Social Security database holding many citizens' information 
     may not reflect common changes, such as when a person marries 
     and changes their last name, or when someone naturalizes and 
     gains U.S. citizenship. People lose their coverage because 
     they receive notices in languages they cannot read. 
     Immigrants are required to submit documents multiple times, 
     or wait while the Department of Homeland Security finds paper 
     files, a result of deficiencies in their databases affecting 
     groups like asylum applicants and some survivors of domestic 
     violence. These are among the many issues consumers face.
       Congress has already deprived undocumented immigrants from 
     the ability to buy coverage, even at full price, so they can 
     see a doctor when they are sick, but this bill would go a 
     step further to delay or put out of reach affordable health 
     insurance for many citizens and lawfully present immigrants. 
     Our organizations firmly believe that this would be 
     detrimental to the people we represent and to all of our 
     communities as a whole. We have seen that when health 
     insurance is unaffordable, people are effectively prevented 
     from obtaining access to the care they need to be healthy.
       This bill is not just an attack on our health care system, 
     it is also an attack on immigrants and people of color, which 
     our organizations stand firmly against. In his statements 
     when introducing this bill, Rep. Lou Barletta focused the 
     bill as part of his effort to ``stop illegal immigration.'' 
     Rep. Barletta has a long history of anti-immigrant rhetoric, 
     from trying to prevent immigrants from leasing a residence to 
     stating that they should be denied life-saving services in 
     hospital emergency rooms. This bill is simply a vehicle for 
     scapegoating immigrants and people of color and will keep 
     eligible people from accessing health care.
       We the undersigned organizations urge you to vote NO on HR 
     2581 and the continued assault on immigrants and the health 
     of our communities.
           Sincerely,


                                National

       Advocates for Youth; African American Ministers In Action; 
     American Federation of Teachers (AFT); American Friends 
     Service Committee; American Intercession; American Society on 
     Aging; Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum; Asian 
     Americans Advancing Justice/AAJC; Asian Pacific Institute on 
     Gender-Based Violence; Asian Pacific Partners for 
     Empowerment, Advocacy & Leadership (APPEAL); Association of 
     Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations (AAPCHO); 
     Autistic Self Advocacy Network; Black Alliance for Just 
     Immigration; Breast Cancer Action; Center for Law and Social 
     Policy (CLASP); Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.; Child 
     Welfare League of America; Children's Advocacy Institute; 
     Children's Defense Fund; Church World Service (CWS);
       Coalition on Human Needs; Columban Center for Advocacy and 
     Outreach; Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good 
     Shepherd, US Provinces; Conscious Talk Radio; Detention Watch 
     Network; Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund; 
     Dominican Sisters; Dominicans of Sinsinawa; Family Equality 
     Council; Farmworker Justice; First Focus Campaign for 
     Children; Food Research & Action Center; Franciscan Sisters 
     of the Poor IJPC; Friends Committee on National Legislation; 
     Generations Inc.; GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBT 
     Equality; Immigrant Legal Resource Center; Indivisible; 
     Institute of the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas; Interfaith 
     Worker Justice;
       Irish Apostolate USA; Jobs With Justice; Justice in Aging; 
     Justice, Peace and Reconciliation Commission, Priests of the 
     Sacred Heart, US Province; Lambda Legal; Leadership Team of 
     the Felician Sisters of North America; League of United Latin 
     American Citizens (LULAC); Medical Mission Sisters; Mi 
     Familia Vota; MomsRising; NAACP; NAPAFASA; National Advocacy 
     Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd; National Asian 
     Pacific American Women's Forum; National Association of 
     County and City Health Officials; National Association of 
     Social Workers; National Black Justice Coalition; National 
     Center for Transgender Equality; National Council of Asian 
     Pacific Americans (NCAPA); National Council of Churches;
       National Council of La Raza (NCLR); National Education 
     Association; National Employment Law Project; National Health 
     Law Program; National Hispanic Medical Association; National 
     Immigrant Justice Center; National Immigration Law Center; 
     National Justice for Our Neighbors; National Latina Institute 
     for Reproductive Health; National Network of Abortion Funds; 
     National Organization for Women; National Women's Health 
     Network; Network for Environmental & Economic Responsibility 
     of United Church of Christ; NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social 
     Justice; NMAC; OCA--Asian Pacific American Advocates; Our 
     Revolution; Peace and Justice Office of the Congregation of 
     Notre Dame; Physicians for Reproductive Health; PICO 
     National;
       Planned Parenthood Federation of America; Poor People's 
     Economic Human Rights Campaign; Prevention Institute; Project 
     Inform; Racine Dominicans; Raising Women's Voices for the 
     Health Care We Need; Refuge Ministries; Sargent Shriver 
     National Center on Poverty Law; Service Employees 
     International Union; Sisters of Charity; Sisters of Charity 
     of Nazareth; Sisters of Mercy of the Americas--Institute 
     Justice Team; Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC); 
     The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights; United 
     Sikhs; United We Dream; Ursuline Sisters of Tildonk, U.S. 
     Province; We Belong Together; API Wellness;


                            State and Local

       Academy of Medical & Public Health Services; Advocates for 
     Children and Youth; AgeOptions; Almost Home, Inc.; Anti-
     Hunger & Nutrition Coalition; Arkansas Advocates for Children 
     and Families; Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing; 
     Asian Americans Advancing Justice--Los Angeles; Asian 
     Community Alliance--Cincinnati OH; Asian Law Alliance; Asian 
     Services In Action, Inc.; Baltimore Jewish Council; 
     California Health Professional Student Alliance; California 
     Immigrant Policy Center; California Latinas for Reproductive 
     Justice (CLRJ); California OneCare; California Pan-Ethnic 
     Health Network; California Partnership; California Physicians 
     Alliance; CASA;
       Center for Southeast Asians; Chicago Hispanic Health 
     Coalition; Child Care Resources of Rockland; Children Now; 
     Children's Defense Fund-CA; Chinatown Service Center; 
     Chinese-American Planning Council; Coalition for Humane 
     Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA); Collaborative Center for Justice; 
     Colorado Center on Law and Policy; Colorado Center on Law and 
     Policy; Columbia Legal Services; Community Health Councils; 
     D.C. Hunger Solutions; DuPage Federation on Human Services 
     Reform; Empower Missouri; Ensuring Opportunity Campaign to 
     End Poverty in Contra Costa; Erie Benedictines for Peace; 
     Esperanza Health Centers; EverThrive Illinois; Farmworker 
     Association of Florida;
       Florida Immigrant Coalition (FLIC); Give for a Smile; 
     Greater Kansas City Coalition to End Homelessness; Having Our 
     Say Coalition; Health Access California; Health Care for All-
     WA; Health Law Advocates; Healthy House Within A MATCH 
     Coalition; Hmong Ohio of Tomorrow; Hunger Action Los Angeles; 
     IHM Sisters, Immaculata, PA; IL Hunger Coalition; Illinois 
     Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights; Indivisible 
     Mountain Home, Idaho; Interfaith Movement for Human 
     Integrity; IRIS--Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services; 
     Islamic Civic Engagement Project; Jewish Family & Children's 
     Service; Kansas Appleseed; Kentucky Equal Justice Center; 
     Korean Community Services of Metropolitan NY; La Fe Policy 
     Research and Education Center;
       La Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program; Legal Council for 
     Health Justice; Legal

[[Page 9180]]

     Services of Southern Piedmont; Maine Consumers for Affordable 
     Health Care; Make the Road New York; Maryland CASH Campaign; 
     Maryland Hunger Solutions; Massachusetts Immigrant and 
     Refugee Advocacy Coalition (MIRA); Massachusetts Law Reform 
     Institute; Maternal and Child Health Access; Maternity Care 
     Coalition; National Association of Social Workers, CT 
     Chapter; National Tongan American Society; Nationalities 
     Service Center; NC Child; New Mexico Center on Law and 
     Poverty; New York Immigration Coalition; New York Legal 
     Assistance Group; NICOS Chinese Health Coalition; NJ State 
     Industrial Union Council; NOELA Community Health Center; 
     Northern NJ Chapter, National Organization for Women;
       Northwest Health Law Advocates; Northwest Immigrant Rights 
     Project; Office of the Health Care Advocate at Vermont Legal 
     Aid; OneAmerica; Pacific Islander Health Partnership; Pitkin 
     County Human Services; Public Justice Center; Puget Sound 
     Advocates for Retirement Action (PSARA); Rainbow Center; 
     Reformed Church of Highland Park; RESULTS-Santa Fe (NM); 
     Salaam Cleveland; Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education 
     Network (SIREN); Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, 
     Houston; Sisters of St. Dominic of Blauvelt, NY; Sisters of 
     the Most Precious Blood; Social Justice Committee St. Patrick 
     Church; South Asian Network; Southwest Women's Law Center; 
     St. Francis St Vincent de Paul Society; Tennessee Justice 
     Center; Thai Health And Information Service;
       The Children's Partnership; The Latino Health Insurance 
     Program, Inc.; Turning Points; United Way Bay Area; URI 
     Feinstein Center for a Hunger Free America; Vermont 
     Affordable Housing Coalition; Virginia Poverty Law Center; 
     Voices for Vermont's Children; Voz Hispana Cambio 
     Comunitario; Washington Community Action Network; Washington 
     Healthcare Access Alliance; Washington State Labor Council, 
     AFL-CIO; West Chester Food Cupboard; West Side Campaign 
     Against Hunger; Westlake Chinese Culture Association; 
     Wisconsin Council of Churches; Wisconsin Faith Voices for 
     Justice; Women's Action Movement Washtenaw County MI; 
     Worksite Wellness LA; Xaverian Brothers; Young Women United;

  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman 
from Pennsylvania (Mr. Barletta), the author of the Verify First Act, 
and as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, I am proud to 
advance this bill.
  Mr. BARLETTA. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding and 
working with me on this important issue. I also thank leadership for 
recognizing this issue and working with me to fix the problem.
  I am proud to rise today in support of my bill, H.R. 2581, the Verify 
First Act.
  My bill is intended to stop fraud in the distribution of healthcare 
tax credits and protect taxpayer dollars. It is simple: the American 
people expect that we are verifying that someone qualifies for taxpayer 
money before that money goes out the door.
  This is about the Federal Government being good stewards of the money 
our constituents send to Washington. Every Federal dollar that goes to 
someone committing fraud is a dollar that is not going to a person who 
truly needs and deserves assistance.
  No one should be allowed to commit fraud at the taxpayers' expense. 
No business would give a refund without first verifying a receipt.
  Yet this is exactly what is happening under our current healthcare 
system. The law claims that taxpayer money will only go to people who 
qualify for it. Yet no one is being held responsible for making sure 
that that happens. My bill does that.
  Under current law, the Federal Government pays tax credits to 
individuals without first verifying that they qualify to receive them. 
If individuals cannot verify their legal status, the IRS is then forced 
to chase after the money.
  This pay-and-chase model of distributing tax credits has greatly 
increased costs to the taxpayers. A 2016 Senate report revealed that, 
under ObamaCare, $750 million in taxpayer-funded healthcare subsidies 
went to people who did not qualify for those benefits.
  We could fix this problem and save time and money so that IRS agents 
are helping people, instead of trying to recover improper payments by 
verifying legal status first.
  My bill simply requires the IRS to work with the relevant Federal 
agencies to verify that an individual is a citizen, national, or 
lawfully present in the United States before tax credits go out the 
door. This can be done by verifying an applicant's Social Security 
number or other immigration documents. Again, the American people 
expect that we are already doing this.
  Under my bill, everyone who applies for the advance premium tax 
credit will be verified for legal status. Most people won't even know 
that this is happening because the verification check is so quick.
  My bill also includes protections that ensure that individuals who 
are legally entitled to these tax credits are not penalized if there is 
a delay in verifying their documents. I first raised this issue last 
year with the previous administration. I am raising it again this year 
because there is no evidence that anything has been done to address it.
  Nobody wanted to take responsibility for mismanaging $750 million of 
taxpayer money. Everyone pointed fingers at other people. My bill holds 
people accountable.
  While I received assurances from the current administration that it 
would implement and follow a process to verify legal status, my bill 
would require it in law. This issue is too important to be left to the 
changing positions of unelected Federal bureaucrats. The American 
people deserve to know that their representatives are doing everything 
in their power to protect taxpayer money.
  The Verify First Act provides that certainty and upholds the 
integrity of the health insurance premium tax credit by putting an end 
to fraud and abuse.
  Mr. Speaker, I thank the cosponsors of my bill for their support. 
They include Diane Black, Mo Brooks, Jeff Duncan, Jimmy Duncan, Mike 
Kelly, Doug Lamborn, Mike McCaul, David McKinley, Kristi Noem, Jim 
Renacci, Mike Rogers, Lamar Smith, Jason Smith, G.T. Thompson, and Joe 
Wilson.
  Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record letters of support from 
NumbersUSA and FAIR, two groups that have been working with me to 
protect the interests of the American worker and legal immigrants.

                                                   NumbersUSA,

                                      Arlington, VA, May 23, 2017.
     Hon. Lou Barletta,
     House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Congressman Barletta: NumbersUSA, on behalf of our 
     more than 8 million activists, applauds you for introducing 
     the Verify First Act to ensure that health care tax credits 
     are not paid to illegal aliens or other disqualified aliens. 
     As you know, NumbersUSA opposed the ineffective verification 
     provisions in the Affordable Care Act because we knew they 
     would result in taxpayer-funded subsidies being sent to 
     illegal aliens. Our concerns, unfortunately, were confirmed 
     by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
     Affairs, which reported that more than $700 million in 
     Obamacare subsidies had been paid to ineligible aliens by 
     2015. Like you, we recognized that these same ineffective 
     verification procedures in the American Health Care Act 
     (AHCA) would result in the payment of health care tax credits 
     to illegal or otherwise ineligible aliens.
       The Verify First Act will require the Social Security 
     Administration (SSA) and the Department of Homeland Security 
     (DHS) to actually verify the citizenship or immigration 
     status of every applicant for a credit under the AHCA before 
     the Treasury Department issues the credit. Both SSA and DHS 
     have established, proven methods of verifying status in a 
     timely and efficient manner, including the E-Verify system, 
     which relies on data from these two agencies to verify work 
     authorization, and the Systematic Alien Verification for 
     Entitlements (SAVE) system, which uses DHS data to establish 
     welfare eligibility.
       Hard-working Americans and legal residents already are 
     struggling to pay for their own health care. There is simply 
     no excuse for the Federal government to force them to 
     subsidize health care for illegal aliens through taxpayer-
     funded credits.
       For this reason, NumbersUSA is delighted to support your 
     Verify First Act and we look forward to working with you to 
     make sure it is enacted into law. We also applaud House 
     Republican Leadership and the House Ways and Means Committee 
     for working with you to close this expensive loophole in our 
     health care system.
           Sincerely,
                                                     Anne Manetas,
                                       Vice President, NumbersUSA.

[[Page 9181]]

     
                                  ____
                                           Federation for American


                                           Immigration Reform,

                                     Washington, DC, May 24, 2017.
     Hon. Lou Barletta,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Congressman Barletta: On behalf of the Federation for 
     American Immigration Reform's (FAIR) nearly 1.5 million 
     members and supporters nationwide, I am writing to thank you 
     for introducing the Verify First Act. This important piece of 
     legislation would deny health care tax credits to illegal 
     aliens and ensure that Americans' hard-earned tax dollars 
     only go to those with a valid Social Security number (SSN).
       As you know, federal law explicitly prevents illegal aliens 
     from receiving tax credits. Despite this, a recent report by 
     the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 
     Committee found that nearly 500,000 illegal aliens received 
     approximately $750 million in taxpayer-funded health care 
     subsidies as of June 2015. Under Obamacare, the federal 
     government pays health care tax credits on a ``temporary 
     basis'' to individuals who are unable to verify their 
     citizenship. If an individual is ultimately unable to verify 
     their immigration status, the funding is suspended and the 
     Internal Revenue Service (IRS) attempts to recoup 
     overpayments from the individuals who were wrongly covered. 
     This challenging practice--known as ``pay and chase''--is 
     costing taxpayers millions.
       As a complement to the recently passed American Health Care 
     Act, your legislation ensures that the IRS has verified that 
     an individual is a citizen, national, or lawfully present in 
     the United States before the advance health insurance premium 
     tax credit is disbursed. This will be done by checking an 
     applicant's SSN or other immigration documents. Additionally, 
     your legislation prohibits the use of the Individual Taxpayer 
     Identification Number (ITIN), which are issued without 
     verification of legal status.
       For the aforementioned reasons, FAIR applauds you for 
     introducing the Verify First Act. When this important piece 
     of legislation is considered on the House floor, FAIR will 
     include the vote in our voting report.
           Sincerely,
                                                        Dan Stein,
                                                        President.

  Mr. BARLETTA. Additionally, this legislation is supported by Citizens 
Against Government Waste and Americans for Tax Reform.
  Finally, I include in the Record a Statement of Administration Policy 
noting that the President would sign this bill into law.

                   Statement of Administration Policy


   H.R. 2581--Verify First Act--Rep. Barletta, R-PA and 14 cosponsors

       The Administration supports H.R. 2581, the Verify First 
     Act. Under Obamacare, millions of dollars in advance payments 
     of the premium tax credit may have been paid on behalf of 
     individuals who were likely ineligible beneficiaries, 
     including illegal immigrants. By eliminating the practice of 
     providing advance payments while an applicant's immigration 
     status is being verified, this bill stems the flow of 
     payments to ineligible individuals under Obamacare and 
     strengthens the ability of the Administration to ensure 
     premium tax credits will be appropriately provided to 
     eligible individuals under the American Health Care Act of 
     2017 (AHCA). By protecting the integrity of Federal funds, 
     this bill furthers the President's vision of a more efficient 
     Federal Government that respects taxpayer dollars.
       H.R. 2581 would prohibit advance payments of premium tax 
     credits to individuals under current law and the AHCA, unless 
     the Secretary of the Treasury receives confirmation that the 
     individual is a citizen or a national of the United States, 
     or is lawfully present in the United States. H.R. 2581 would 
     also strengthen the AHCA, as passed by the House of 
     Representatives on May 4, 2017, which the Administration 
     continues to support strongly.
       If H.R. 2581 were presented to the President in its current 
     form, his advisors would recommend that he sign the bill into 
     law.

  Mr. BARLETTA. Mr. Speaker, I strongly urge passage of my bill.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I would like to remind the majority that 
the IRS would be able to do their job if they didn't spend the last 8 
years demonizing the IRS and cutting their budget year after year.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman 
from Michigan (Mr. Levin), my colleague on the Ways and Means 
Committee.
  Mr. LEVIN. Mr. Speaker, this act jeopardizes American families' 
ability to afford health insurance.
  The so-called Verify First Act would require a new verification 
process of an individual's Social Security number before he or she can 
receive any tax credit for health coverage, either under the ACA or 
under the disastrous House-passed TrumpCare bill.
  This bill does nothing to address the reality that more than 23 
million Americans would lose health insurance under the Republican 
healthcare legislation; nor does it address the harm caused by cutting 
$800 billion from Medicaid by eliminating the expansion for moderate-
income workers and by imposing per capita caps on program spending; and 
it does nothing to address higher premiums for older workers and 
discrimination against Americans with preexisting conditions that will 
occur under the TrumpCare bill that this legislation is amending.
  Instead, this bill takes that one step further by making it harder 
for children, including newborns and survivors of domestic violence and 
sex trafficking, to obtain a tax credit for purchasing their own health 
coverage. Under the legislation, Social Security numbers would be 
required before receiving a tax credit, and it prohibits the use of an 
individual taxpayer identification number, which those without a Social 
Security number use to file their tax returns.
  Mr. Speaker, as has already been said, there are already protections 
built into the law to ensure that tax credits are issued to qualifying 
individuals. Under current law, eligibility for tax credits is verified 
when an individual applies to enroll in coverage. The eligibility is 
then subject to a secondary verification process that identifies 
ineligible individuals and terminates their coverage. This system 
strikes a balance between rigorously verifying eligibility, while also 
ensuring that eligible individuals are not subject to financial 
hardship because of red tape.
  Mr. Speaker, this bill would make it more difficult for American 
families to access affordable healthcare. I oppose this bill, and I 
urge my colleagues to do the same.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman 
from Pennsylvania (Mr. Kelly), a key member of the Ways and Means 
Committee.
  Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I have a chart that I am 
going to put up here in a minute, but there is something that I think 
we all need to realize: Our positions here not only are as 
representatives but also stewards of taxpayer money.
  Now, a lot of people sometimes become confused as to whose money it 
is that we are talking about, and what we are talking about is 
hardworking American taxpayers.
  The definition of a steward is pretty simple: It is someone who 
manages another's property or financial affairs; one who administers 
anything as the agent of another or others.
  The oath we take makes us responsible for every single penny that we 
spend or allocate because it came out of the pocket of a hardworking 
American taxpayer.
  So it just seems to me that Mr. Barletta's idea makes sense: this 
idea that somehow actually making sure that people qualify for a 
subsidy is somehow being mean-hearted and not being actually a steward 
of these dollars.
  I just wanted to point this out. This is H.R. 3590, the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act. It was the final vote on March 21, 
2010. And I would just tell some of my colleagues: Take a look because 
some of your names are very prominent there--and you can see it. The 
piece that we are talking about is the piece that was included in the 
Affordable Care Act. This isn't something that we dreamed up overnight; 
this is something that was actually part of the Affordable Care Act.
  And now we are saying: My goodness, we are allowing these subsidies 
to be out there. And then what we are saying is: Well, we are going to 
presume that whoever it is who applied for these subsidies actually is 
entitled to them.
  Now, that only works in Washington, D.C. In the private sector, you 
usually have to verify before you do anything, as opposed to saying: 
Well, do you know what, somebody said that they were entitled to this, 
so we ought to just go ahead and pass this on.
  I have got to tell you: It is a lot easier when it doesn't come out 
of your pocket. But, when it comes out of hardworking American 
taxpayers' pockets, I think it is incumbent upon us, as elected 
representatives, to say that

[[Page 9182]]

there is something that doesn't make sense here.
  When over half a million people receive over $750 million in 
subsidies, somebody, somewhere, should be saying: How did this happen?
  I think it is interesting that neither HHS or the IRS has any method 
in place to actually go out and recoup these dollars that were 
wrongfully awarded. This just doesn't make sense. Mr. Barletta is doing 
something that is common sense.
  And I know that when the act was passed, the most famous quote of all 
is: We have to pass it to find out what is in it.
  Well, we did pass it. I wasn't here. I was in the private sector. But 
these are all of the folks who passed it. This is actually your policy. 
This is Lou Barletta's policy. This isn't a Republican policy. This is 
a policy that was part of the Affordable Care Act.
  Why in the world would we ever, as taxpayers, expect people to verify 
this type of activity?
  We should just say: Listen, they seem like pretty good folks, and 
they are going to eventually get back to us.
  We have no way of recouping this money.
  Now, we can rail about people not having hearts; we can rail about 
people who don't like immigrants; and we can rail about taking this out 
on hardworking families and making it difficult for them to get by.
  I would just say this: We are trying to protect taxpayer money. We 
are trying to protect something that is so basic. We are trying to 
protect something that is actually part of the law that was passed as 
part of the Affordable Care Act. This isn't a foreign idea. This just 
makes sense.
  So I would just ask my friends: Listen, please go to H.R. 3590, the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and go to section 1411--
this is your language, by the way. As I said, I wasn't here at the 
time. I did read it, and I am still scratching my head to say: Do you 
know what, this is probably a good policy; you should probably read it 
before you pass it.
  But it says exactly what it is that you expect people receiving these 
subsidies to go through.
  It is amazing me today that, all of a sudden, this is Potomac 
amnesia: I don't remember that part of the law.
  So, look, there could be nothing more sensible--commonsensical--than 
making sure that before we issue subsidies, that are funded by 
hardworking American taxpayers, that we actually verify who it is that 
is getting them; rather than going ahead and putting it out there and 
then saying: Do you know what, maybe they don't qualify.
  Well, how do you get the money back?
  This pay-and-chase idea, to me, would never work in the private 
sector because we actually have to be responsible for what we do.
  Now, I don't want you to get all wrapped around the axle and think 
that somehow we are coming after people in a way that doesn't make 
sense.
  Here is what I want you to think about: I want you to think about the 
people who actually pay the tab, the people who actually pick up the 
check, the people who actually pay taxes, the people to who we are the 
most responsible.
  And to somehow come up with an idea that it is mean-hearted to verify 
who is getting these subsidies, to me, is tomfoolery. If you want to do 
something, and you want to make it hard for people to understand what 
we are doing, do this: I would love to go back home and tell people 
what you folks just don't understand. You sent the money to us, we 
decided how we are going to spend it, we decided that we can give it to 
anybody we want, and, by the way, if they don't qualify, that shouldn't 
bother you.
  Now, let's just do something that makes sense.

                              {time}  1400

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield the gentleman an additional 
1 minute.
  Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania. Well, you know what? I really don't need a 
full minute to talk about something that is common sense, but I have 
been here now a little bit over 6 years, and it is hard for me to 
believe that this act was passed back on March 21, 2010, and the 
language we are talking about today is the actual language that was in 
the bill that we had to pass before we could find out what was in it.
  Maybe at that time somebody should have read this, and it was a good 
idea to actually verify these things. That would have saved a whole lot 
of time, a whole lot of money, and a whole lot of irresponsible 
spending.
  Again, whether you want to agree with the study or not agree with the 
study, when half a million people receive over $750 million in 
hardworking American taxpayer money, and then we are told: Geez, I 
can't believe you are that mean that you want to go back and recoup 
money from people who didn't deserve it--no. What we are saying is 
let's verify first. Let's make sure of every single penny that goes out 
of this House--the people's House, by the way--and let's do what is the 
responsible thing to do as stewards of every single taxpayer penny.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I would just remind my colleagues that 
under the ACA, there is also a verification process for subsidies. But 
I would just raise the issue that for newborn children, most of whom 
don't have a Social Security number when they are newborn--and this 
includes children of our military members serving overseas--if they 
have a severe health problem, then delaying verification, which can be 
up to 6 weeks for them, can mean the difference between life and death. 
And I am talking about a situation such as that experienced by Jimmy 
Kimmel, if you take the time to see his response to what happened with 
his newborn.
  With that, Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 4 minutes to the 
distinguished gentleman from Texas (Mr. Doggett), also a member of the 
Ways and Means Committee.
  Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, this so-called American Health Care bill is 
a real Titanic of a sorry piece of legislation: It would sink 23 
million Americans losing their health coverage; millions more who have 
a preexisting condition would face great barriers; it would undermine 
Medicare; it would provide price-gouging, Big Pharma manufacturers with 
a huge tax windfall, all as part of almost a trillion dollars in a tax 
cut--which is what their bill is really all about, not healthcare--
those benefits going to a few corporations and the superrich among us.
  Most every healthcare professional group in the country along with 
the AARP and the vast majority of Americans reject this bill. We would 
have even more people rejecting if it hadn't been hidden, if even one 
administration official had had the courage to come and be held 
accountable for this bill in a public hearing. But, apparently, we will 
not have that anywhere in this Congress before this huge bill is 
approved.
  The American people are locked on board this sinking ship. Our 
insurance markets are already taking on water from Trump sabotage, and 
disaster looms in front of us.
  This is not a Verify First bill that we take up today; it is a patch 
on this sinking Titanic ship.
  It is not a Verify First; it is a ``Vilify First'' our immigrants, 
and it is really just the next chapter in Trump's anti-immigrant 
crusade, which he tweets about on a regular basis.
  Our Republican colleagues celebrate this Immigrant Heritage Month, 
June. They celebrate the fourth anniversary of 68 Members of the United 
States Senate, in a bipartisan way, approving comprehensive immigration 
reform. They do it with this ``Vilify First Act.''
  And while I want to protect taxpayers and think we have a 
responsibility to ferret out and prevent every dime of fraud that might 
be out there, I also feel a responsibility to struggling families that 
I represent who already have so many barriers in the way of getting 
medical coverage to their children.
  Not everyone is as fortunate as Jimmy Kimmel, although he had the 
misfortune of a child born with serious

[[Page 9183]]

medical needs, he at least had the ability to do something about it. 
And folks need to be able to access promptly and immediately, 
sometimes, a family doctor.
  We should fight fraud wherever it occurs. I do wish we had the same 
level of enthusiasm about protecting taxpayers from Medicaid fraud by 
big pharmaceutical manufacturers, for offshore tax dodging that denies 
us billions of dollars, as they voice for taking on the poor. We don't 
have that, but we do need to analyze carefully what the Government 
Accountability Office that provides the basis for this legislation 
really said.
  They found a need to address $750 million. Under the program, they 
did not find one dollar, one red cent that an immigrant had taken 
improperly from this program. They did not document any immigrant 
fraud. There may be some out there, but you can't rely on this study to 
find it.
  We were asked: Well, why do you think this has anything to do with 
immigrants? Well, I can tell you why. Because the sponsor of the 
amendment, who is here on the floor, when he introduced this piece of 
legislation, said he was after what he called illegal immigrants; and 
he said that he would not vote for TrumpCare, that sorry Titanic of a 
bill, he would not vote for it unless this provision was adopted.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. I yield the gentleman an additional 1 minute.
  Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, I personally represent San Antonio, San 
Marcus, Lockhart, and Austin families that already face barriers to 
getting their children medical coverage, and adding an additional 
requirement just means they are that much less likely, in the event of 
an emergency, to be able to get coverage. We need to prevent fraud. 
This is not the way to do it.
  What we need is comprehensive immigration reform to deal with these 
immigration issues just like the Senate approved 4 years ago--make 
improvements on it; debate it; consider it--sink this sorry piece of 
legislation, try to raise up the antifraud provisions and the 
comprehensive immigration reform that we so desperately need, and to 
grow this economy.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis).
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2581, the 
Verify First Act. This legislation is part of our continued focus on 
improving the Nation's healthcare system beyond the passage of the 
American Health Care Act. The bill ensures those who receive help to 
purchase health insurance are truly eligible. What is wrong with that?
  Under the Obama administration, an estimated $750 million in tax 
credits have been awarded to over 500,000 individuals who were later 
determined to be ineligible. For the sake of hardworking Americans 
everywhere, we need to be better stewards of taxpayer dollars. That 
means verify first.
  Why not? The Verify First Act protects taxpayer dollars from waste, 
fraud, and abuse under ObamaCare and, in the future, under the American 
Health Care Act. This bill is good for taxpayers and good for America's 
healthcare future. It is as simple as that.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, it is now my pleasure to yield 3 minutes to 
the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Judy Chu), a colleague from the 
Ways and Means Committee.
  Ms. JUDY CHU of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition 
to this misguided bill. This bill will prevent people who have a 
legitimate right to healthcare from accessing it and will harm them, 
and it is for reasons that are completely unjustified.
  Currently, taxpayers must provide a Social Security number or tax 
I.D. number in order to qualify for a premium tax credit for 
healthcare. While the taxpayer's citizenship and immigration status are 
verified, they are given a 90-day grace period in which to prove their 
legal status.
  This grace period was put into place to ensure that people do not 
lose critical healthcare coverage and continue to have it while their 
paperwork is cleared. This bill would remove this safeguard and make it 
more difficult for numerous people to obtain health insurance. That 
could be a matter of life or death.
  This bill would certainly create barriers for immigrants who are here 
legally. It would also create barriers for U.S. citizens who have 
complications with their Social Security numbers. This includes people 
who recently change their name after marriage, have an error in their 
records, were born abroad, or were victims of human trafficking. It 
would also affect newborns, who do not get their Social Security number 
right away.
  Republicans claim that reports released by the GAO and the Senate 
Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee were proof of 
immigrants defrauding the government, but neither of these reports back 
up this claim.
  First of all, the GAO report was actually a test to identify 
vulnerabilities for fraud in the system. They did not find instances of 
immigrants committing fraud for healthcare subsidies. The Senate report 
found that 500,000 individuals did not complete their verification 
process and were, thus, deemed ineligible for subsidies.
  The author of today's bill takes this information and leaps to the 
conclusion that all those who did not complete the process were 
undocumented immigrants and were attempting to commit fraud, but there 
is nothing in either report to substantiate this. In fact, the ACA 
requires undocumented immigrants or anybody who does receive subsidies 
in error to pay back every cent on their tax return at the end of the 
year.
  This bill seeks to address a problem that does not exist. Instead, it 
would harm people by denying or delaying health insurance subsidies to 
people who need them. This is wrong. I urge my colleagues to vote 
``no.''
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Marino).
  Mr. MARINO. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2581, the 
Verify First Act, which was introduced by my colleague, good friend, 
and fellow Pennsylvanian Lou Barletta. This is a simple piece of 
legislation that ensures no American taxpayer dollars are used to fund 
healthcare for those who are here undocumented.
  Congress, the American people, and my constituents were told that, 
under ObamaCare, illegal immigrants would not be eligible for tax 
credits. Instead, the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs 
Committee issued a report detailing that, as of June 2015, over half a 
million people without legal status have received up to $750 million in 
taxpayer-funded subsidies. No record can be found if any of this was 
ever recovered.
  It is time that we ensure our taxpayers that their dollars are only 
going to those with legal status. I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' 
on this legislation.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased at this time to yield 3 
minutes to the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer), my colleague on 
the Ways and Means Committee.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, it is always a privilege to share the 
Chamber with my fellow Northwesterner.
  We have gone through this in the Ways and Means Committee with one of 
the least productive hearings I can remember, and that says a lot in my 
10 years on the committee. We do it good natured, but, frankly, it is 
beside the point. And my friends from the Ways and Means Committee have 
documented the fact that this is a solution in search of a problem.
  The real outrage ought to be what is happening now behind closed 
doors to take a flawed bill that came from the House, was actually made 
worse in order to get the votes for it, and passed through on a narrow 
party-line vote--actually, a number of Republicans voted against it--
lodged in the Senate, no public hearings. In fact, we are told that 
they are not enabling people to actually get ahold of the documents to 
know what is going on.

[[Page 9184]]

  You know, it is stunning to me to have heard some of my Republican 
friends complain about the process of the Affordable Care Act. I was in 
the middle of that. We took a year. Three committees in the House had 
multiple hearings, work sessions. There were actually some Republican 
amendments adopted out in the open. CBO scored the bill so people knew. 
Now we are on the verge of, we are told, having that sneak through the 
Senate without the glare of publicity, without an open public process, 
which will deny healthcare to millions of people--millions of people--
and shred much of the good work that has been done through the 
Affordable Care Act.

                              {time}  1415

  We have been told and we acknowledge there are little things that we 
could do to fine-tune it, but in 7 years of Republican crow and crow, 
we have never had an opportunity to do that. Instead, this 
administration and my Republican friends consistently made it worse, 
destabilized, sent conflicting signals to the healthcare industry, to 
the insurance companies. And you don't have to take my word for it. 
News accounts quote people in the industry about what the Republicans 
have done to destabilize it and try to make it fail.
  There was a reason that virtually everybody in the healthcare space 
was opposed to the Republican approach. It is not thoughtful. It is not 
fair. It is not effective. It is not necessary. But today we are 
looking at some provisions that will make it a little more burdensome.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Simpson). The time of the gentleman has 
expired.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Oregon.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, there may be some people that will be 
swept up who had gotten care that they didn't, but there will be people 
who will be swept up who were entitled to care who could not jump 
through the hurdles or, at a minimum, had their care delayed. We 
haven't properly analyzed that. But as I say, it is beside the point.
  There are tremendous opportunities for us to work together on a 
bipartisan agenda that we have in the Ways and Means Committee, of 
things that we could move forward and agree upon to make healthcare 
better, that doesn't depend on shredding the guarantees of the ACA; 
that doesn't depend on gutting Medicaid, which more Americans rely upon 
for their healthcare than any other program in the country. We wouldn't 
have to mess with that.
  Instead, we are having a sideshow. I don't know that it goes 
anywhere, but it certainly isn't the issue that Americans could focus 
on, should focus on, that is going to imperil their healthcare for tens 
of millions of Americans if the Republicans have their way.
  That is exactly why we are debating this today, to deflect attention, 
occupy time, and prevent doing the job that we should have done right 
here, and allow the Senate to be able to continue this unfortunate 
process.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to yield 3 minutes to the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Renacci), a colleague of mine on the Ways and 
Means Committee.
  Mr. RENACCI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2581, the 
Verify First Act, introduced by my good friend and colleague, 
Congressman Lou Barletta. This legislation seeks to remedy one of the 
many oversights of the ACA that it failed to address--an oversight at 
the expense of the American taxpayer.
  Under the current system, the Treasury disburses credits to 
individuals before their application has been verified. In the real 
world, where I come from, that just doesn't happen. If the IRS then 
finds out that this individual is not eligible, they have to try to get 
the money back. It is almost impossible to recover that money.
  This legislation closes a loophole simply by requiring an individual 
be verified as lawfully present before the Treasury releases the money. 
It is important to understand that the issue at hand is about poor 
stewardship of hard-earned tax dollars. That is what the American 
people sent us down here for. The sole intent of this credit was for 
the credits to be used lawfully, and this legislation helps ensure just 
that.
  At a time when our national debt is $19 trillion and counting, it 
makes no sense for the Federal Government to continue to write these 
checks. My constituents in Ohio depend on me to ensure responsible 
stewardship of their hard-earned tax dollars.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to commit to the same 
responsibility and support the Verify First Act.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  My colleagues on the other side of the aisle are calling this bill 
and the two other healthcare bills on the floor this week ``fixes'' for 
TrumpCare. But what exactly is it that you are fixing?
  This bill does nothing to address the more than 23 million 
individuals who will lose their coverage or the $800 billion cut to 
Medicaid under TrumpCare. Nothing in this bill will do anything to fix 
the waiver allowing insurers to discriminate against individuals with 
preexisting conditions by jacking up their rates, and nothing in this 
bill will do anything to roll back the massive tax cut that they are 
handing out to the top 400 households in America.
  Instead of addressing the real issues with our healthcare system, you 
bring a racist bill to the floor that you use to buy a vote, literally, 
for your TrumpCare bill.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, the rules of the House are very 
clear about imputing the character of lawmakers, and I would warn the 
gentlewoman, she is treading on the rules.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentleman attempting to raise a 
parliamentary inquiry?
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. I am considering.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from California has the 
time.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. I will monitor the remainder of the remarks.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I was addressing a racist piece of 
legislation that was used to buy a vote for the TrumpCare bill. But the 
problem is that this bill doesn't do anything that it says it does. It 
is based on a blatantly partisan Senate report that doesn't even say 
what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle claim that it says.
  It is baffling how many of my Republican colleagues believe that this 
report that they keep citing actually said anything about undocumented 
immigrants. Did you ``read'' this report in the same way that you 
``read'' the AHCA and all of its amendments?
  If you actually read the report, you would know that it does not 
state that these individuals were undocumented immigrants, but only 
that they did not complete the verification process. The hurdles might 
have been too big, it might have taken too much time or too much 
effort, and they dropped out of the verification process without 
completing it.
  The report also doesn't say that hundreds of thousands of 
undocumented immigrants enrolled and received premium credits. The 
report states that ``as of September 30, 2015, CMS awarded 
approximately $750 million in advance premium tax credits to 
individuals enrolled through healthcare.gov who CMS later determined to 
be ineligible. . . .''
  It is funny that the daughter of Mexican American immigrants is able 
to read and understand the distinctions made in this report better than 
some of my native-born colleagues can.
  Mr. Speaker, I want to close by begging my Republican colleagues to 
prove to me that this bill isn't about shutting out immigrants from 
access to care: legal immigrants or children of those born overseas to 
our military or newborn children or victims of domestic violence or 
victims of human trafficking.
  Prove to me that you care about the health and wellbeing of all 
Americans, regardless of the color of their skin or their economic 
circumstances.
  I am actually in agreement with you that ineligible individuals 
should not

[[Page 9185]]

see a single penny of the subsidies provided by both the ACA and the 
AHCA, but there are protections already in place where only citizens 
and people lawfully present in the United States can enroll in 
marketplace coverage and get subsidies to help them pay their premiums 
and cost-sharing charges.
  This bill doesn't fix anything. It just seeks to further demonize 
immigrants as criminals and people with my last name out of the 
healthcare system.
  Instead of wasting our time on a bill that is in search of a problem 
to solve, a problem that doesn't even exist, let's work together to 
make sure that other Americans are not caught up in the unintended 
consequences of this bill and aren't denied coverage when they are 
actually eligible for those subsidies and that coverage.
  Let's actually work on a better way for the American people.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Let's make sure we fact-check some things here. Nothing in this bill 
changes the eligibility of the Affordable Care Act and who is eligible 
for it. In fact, the Republican healthcare bill that passed the House, 
according to the American Action Network, there will be roughly 5.3 
million more Americans that will be eligible for help for their 
healthcare under the Republican plan than under the Affordable Care 
Act.
  Let's fact-check a couple of other issues. We are told that this has 
all come about because the IRS has not funded properly, but I would 
remind our Democrat colleagues that the majority of our Democrat 
colleagues supported the spending levels, which President Obama signed 
into law regarding the Internal Revenue Service.
  Secondly, they have raised the issue that there are no Social 
Security numbers available. But in truth, nearly 96 percent of children 
born in America receive their Social Security numbers within 2 weeks. 
There is an expedited process going forward to achieve the others as 
well.
  We are told, listening today: there is no fraud in ObamaCare; there 
is no fraud to worry about; there is no need for this bill by Mr. 
Barletta.
  But I remind our colleagues that twice the Government Accountability 
Office looked at eligibility within the Affordable Care Act. In 2014, 
they used fake identities to see if they could obtain ObamaCare 
coverage on the exchange, and in 11 out of 12 applications--some with 
no data at all--the GAO was granted subsidies for people who don't even 
exist.
  So you say: Well, that is 2014. Certainly, things got better.
  Well, last year, they ran it again in the special enrollment period, 
and in this test, the GAO was able to obtain coverage for imaginary 
people in 9 out of 12 cases.
  We are told today that our taxpayer dollars aren't being wasted. 
Well, the American public knows better, and they know this because we 
have worked for 7 years to oppose what we knew would be a failing law. 
We held more than 200 congressional hearings. We had 65-plus hours of 
open debate on the American Health Care Act, and 37 bills passed the 
House that were ultimately, in one form or another, included in the 
Republican bill.
  The bottom line is this, Mr. Speaker: Our Democrat friends are in 
denial. ObamaCare is collapsing. Prices have more than doubled. They 
haven't gone down. They have more than doubled for most Americans; in 
some States more than tripled, and those rates aren't going down. They 
are skyrocketing. People aren't getting more choices of healthcare 
plans. They are disappearing.
  Texas has seen nine insurers abandon our State--I think more than any 
other State--and it is getting fewer and fewer. It is occurring across 
the country.
  You are not able to see more local doctors and go to more local 
hospitals; just the opposite. It is fewer, and that is hurting everyone 
in America. ObamaCare is a sinking ship, and it is taking some very 
good Americans down with it.
  The question is: Do we begin to give people a lifeline to truly 
affordable care?
  With this bill, Mr. Barletta insists in a commonsense way that your 
tax dollars go to those we are trying to help: those who can't get 
healthcare at work; those who don't get it through government programs 
like Medicare or the VA; those small-business people; those folks 
coming out of college; those entrepreneurs who are at home starting a 
new business or raising their families; even those early retirees. 
Those are the people we are trying to help, and every dollar counts.
  Mr. Barletta's bill, which I am proud as chairman of the Ways and 
Means Committee to bring to you, makes a commonsense requirement: that 
you be verified to get those subsidies before you receive them; to make 
sure those precious dollars actually go to the Americans we are trying 
to help.
  I strongly support the Verify First Act. If you stand for stopping 
waste, and fraud, and abuse in protection of your tax dollars, I would 
urge your support for this bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BABIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 2581, the Verify 
First Act, which will put important safeguards in place to ensure that 
federal tax dollars are not fraudulently used to pay for illegal 
immigrants to enroll in Obamacare.
  Right now, the federal government provides Obamacare premium tax 
credits to individuals before fully making sure that these individuals 
rightfully qualify for these benefits.
  For example, the federal government has wrongfully issued hundreds of 
millions of dollars in tax credits to individuals without first 
verifying their immigration status. After the money goes out the door, 
the Internal Revenue Service must attempt to track down these 
individuals to recoup the money.
  Last year the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government 
Affairs reported that more than $750 million in taxpayer dollars went 
to 500,000 people who did not meet the qualifications for those 
benefits.
  H.R. 2581 addresses this issue by requiring that the Social Security 
Administration, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department 
of Health and Human Services to certify that an individual is a 
citizen, national, or legal immigrant before they receive a health care 
tax credit.
  Given that our nation is nearly $20 trillion in debt, we cannot 
afford to hand out hundreds of millions of dollars in Obamacare tax 
credits to individuals who do not qualify.
  This bill is a common-sense measure that puts the interests of 
hardworking taxpayers first and ensures that health care dollars will 
be directed only at those who are eligible.
  I hope that the Senate will soon take up and pass this commonsense 
bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 378, the previous question is ordered on 
the bill, as amended.
  The question is on the engrossment and third reading of the bill.
  The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, and was 
read the third time.

                              {time}  1430


                           Motion to Recommit

  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, I have a motion to recommit at the desk.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentlewoman opposed to the bill?
  Ms. SANCHEZ. I am opposed to the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to 
recommit.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       Ms. Sanchez moves to recommit the bill H.R. 2581 to the 
     Committee on Ways and Means with instructions to report the 
     same back to the House forthwith with the following 
     amendment:
       Page 4, line 5, insert after the first period the 
     following: ``The preceding sentence shall not apply in the 
     case of a delay in verification of such status of an 
     individual who has not attained the age of 1.''.
       Page 5, line 4, insert after the first period the 
     following: ``The preceding sentence shall not apply in the 
     case of a delay in verification of such status of an 
     individual who has not attained the age of 1.''.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from 
California is recognized for 5 minutes in support of her motion.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, this is the final amendment to the bill, 
which will not kill the bill.

[[Page 9186]]

  If adopted, the Verify First Act will proceed to final passage as 
amended.
  The Democratic motion to recommit simply amends the Verify First Act 
to ensure that our most vulnerable--newborns and infants--do not 
experience a delay in health coverage.
  We know that the citizenship of newborns can't be verified 
electronically because they don't have Social Security numbers yet when 
they are born. In order to verify their child's status, parents have to 
send a copy of their child's birth certificate, which can take anywhere 
from 1 to 6 weeks to obtain, depending on the State, and that is the 
best-case scenario if the parents throw a perfect game in documenting 
and planning for the arrival of their newborn. Just like any perfect 
game, a little luck is involved in that.
  That luck includes having the Social Security Administration process 
your child's Social Security number as soon as they receive it, that 
the Administration doesn't make a mistake in the spelling of your 
child's name, and that you have the financial resources and education 
to know exactly what steps you need to take to ensure that your newborn 
has coverage the moment they come out of your womb.
  When most people are anticipating the birth of a child, that is not 
what they are thinking about. The birth of a child is one of life's 
most precious moments. The joy you feel when you hold your child for 
the first time should be the only feeling going through your mind. 
Filling the paperwork out to ensure that your child is covered 
shouldn't even be something that you should have to worry about.
  But the Verify First Act, as currently drafted, would give you 
another thing to worry about and add an unnecessary barrier for 
newborns to receive the care they need. God forbid if your child needs 
extra care after they are born but doesn't have coverage because your 
plan is waiting to verify your child's status.
  A child's life should not hang in the balance because of paperwork 
and red tape. For all the claims that Republicans are the pro-life 
party, they sure know how to make life difficult for a newborn as soon 
as they are out of the womb. They claim to protect the lives of the 
unborn and crusade against lifesaving institutions such as Planned 
Parenthood. But where are their morals and love of life after the child 
is born? It somehow magically disappears, and they will throw every 
obstacle up to ensure that newborns don't receive the care that they 
need and that they are entitled to.
  Whether it is through the unintended consequences of a poorly drafted 
bill such as this one, or gutting the program that covers half the 
births in the U.S., Republicans will do everything to gut access to 
care or place obstacles in struggling people's paths. That's right, by 
cutting over $800 billion out of Medicaid, Republicans are endangering 
the health and welfare of all newborn children.
  Earlier I asked my Republican colleagues to prove to me that they 
care about the health and well-being of all Americans regardless of the 
color of their skin or their economic circumstances. Well, I am asking 
them now to prove to me that they care about the well-being of newborn 
children.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote for the Democratic motion 
to recommit, and let us write a bill that will actually help all U.S. 
citizens get the coverage that they need and are entitled to.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the motion 
to recommit.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, this isn't about verifying for 
infants. Ninety-six percent of children receive their Social Security 
numbers within 2 weeks after they are born in a hospital, and many of 
them have parents who are eligible for these credits as well, so it is 
immediate care. Even without all that, they can achieve and receive 
healthcare immediately as they process the premium support.
  In the American Health Care Act that passed the House, there are more 
than $1 billion set aside to help further the verification process to 
make sure that we are providing timely credits--but for those who are 
eligible. In truth, our friends across the aisle want to detract from 
the challenge today, which is that ObamaCare is a sinking ship.
  Today's bill is about the taxpayers. Congress has to do all in its 
power to ensure the money taken from hardworking taxpayers is actually 
used for programs that improve their lives in this country and are not 
frittered away on fraud and abuse.
  That is why this bill is so critical. It doesn't change eligibility. 
It simply says that we are not going to pay first and chase later, 
which always is a losing approach for taxpayers. Not a dollar of 
taxpayer money should go out the door until citizenship or legal status 
is verified, period.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to defeat the Democrats' motion to 
recommit and stand on behalf of taxpayers who want those dollars to go 
to Americans we are truly trying to help for the first time get truly 
affordable healthcare.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the previous question is 
ordered on the motion to recommit.
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion to recommit.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the noes appeared to have it.
  Ms. SANCHEZ. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further 
proceedings on this question will be postponed.

                          ____________________