[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 163 (2017), Part 6]
[House]
[Page 8300]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              {time}  1630
                 DHS STOP ASSET AND VEHICLE EXCESS ACT

  Mr. McCAUL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to take from the 
Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 366) to amend the Homeland Security Act 
of 2002 to direct the Under Secretary for Management of the Department 
of Homeland Security to make certain improvements in managing the 
Department's vehicle fleet, and for other purposes, with the Senate 
amendments thereto, and concur in the Senate amendments.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the Senate amendments.
  The Clerk read as follows:
  Senate amendments:

     (1)On page 6, line 17, insert shall after heads.
     (2)On page 12, strike line 16 through page 14, and insert: 

     SEC. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW.

       The Inspector General of the Department of Homeland 
     Security shall--
       (1) conduct a review of the implementation of subsection 
     (c)(4) of section 701 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 
     U.S.C. 341), as added by section 2 of this Act, for fiscal 
     year 2019, which shall include analysis of the effectiveness 
     of such subsection (c)(4) with respect to cost avoidance, 
     savings realized, and component operations; and
       (2) provide, upon request, to the Committee on Homeland 
     Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the 
     Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
     Representatives information regarding the review required 
     under paragraph (1).

  Mr. McCAUL (during the reading). Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent 
to dispense with the reading of the Senate amendments.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the original request 
of the gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________