[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 163 (2017), Part 2]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page 2708]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]


                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. PETER J. VISCLOSKY

                               of indiana

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, February 15, 2017

  Mr. VISCLOSKY. Mr. Speaker, on February 14, 2017, I was absent from 
the House and missed Roll Call Votes 88 through 92.
  Had I been present for Roll Call Vote 88, on ordering the previous 
question, I would have voted ``No.''
  Had I been present for Roll Call Vote 89, on agreeing to the 
resolution, H.Res. 99, providing for consideration of H.R. 428, the Red 
River Gradient Boundary Survey Act, and H.J. Res. 42, Disapproving the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug testing of 
unemployment compensation applicants, I would have voted ``No.''
  Had I been present for Roll Call Vote 90, on ordering the previous 
question, I would have voted ``No.''
  Had I been present for Roll Call Vote 91, on agreeing to the 
resolution, H.Res. 116, providing for consideration of H.J. Res. 66, 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental 
employees and H.J. Res. 67, Disapproving the rule submitted by the 
Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by 
qualified State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees, 
I would have voted ``No.''
  Had I been present for Roll Call Vote 92, on passage of H.R. 428--Red 
River Gradient Boundary Survey Act, I would have voted ``No.''

                          ____________________