[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 163 (2017), Part 14]
[Senate]
[Pages 20229-20231]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




       TRAIN CRASH IN TACOMA, WASHINGTON, AND REPUBLICAN TAX PLAN

  Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, a tax bill is a fiscal document. It is 
a legal document. It is also a moral document. It involves choices, 
much as we make choices as families when we own a car that is unsafe or 
a house that has a front step that is about to collapse or when a 
college student needs money to pursue her education. A family can make 
choices. A parent can go to the casino and gamble and lose the money or 
spend it on luxuries that are unnecessary or unwise, and nations make 
those kinds of moral choices as well.
  This tax document is a moral document. It involves choices. Will it 
make our country safer, rebuild our infrastructure and our national 
defense or, instead, in effect, squander resources of $1.5 trillion or 
more on a giveaway to the very wealthiest in our country? It relates 
directly to the tragedy that this Nation experienced outside of Tacoma, 
WA, just yesterday.
  I want to extend, first of all, my thoughts and prayers to those 
families and loved ones who have suffered losses. The three deaths and 
injuries have taken their toll emotionally as well as physically. In 
these dark days, we are demanding answers.
  Unfortunately, the National Transportation Safety Board is there, 
beginning its investigation. We know now that the train apparently was 
traveling three times the limit on speed, 80 miles an hour in a 30-
mile-an-hour zone. That fact is absolutely stunning and scandalous, and 
the NTSB, no doubt, will present its results after its investigation.
  I call on the NTSB to finish that investigation as promptly and 
quickly as possible. As responsible an agency as it is, it often works 
much more slowly than taxpayers deserve. I call on it to produce its 
investigation, not in months or years but in days or weeks. We need to 
know the answers as to why this catastrophe occurred. We now know with 
certainty, apparently, that the train was traveling too fast.
  You may be forgiven for thinking it seems like deja vu. Didn't that 
happen also in Spuyten Duyvil, where four people were lost? Didn't it 
happen in Philadelphia, where eight were killed in 2015? Yes, again, 
three people were killed yesterday.
  Three hundred people have been killed in these accidents since 1970, 
when the NTSB first recommended impementing this new technology. It

[[Page 20230]]

was new technology in 1970 called positive train control. Now it is old 
technology, but it still has not been installed in many of the Nation's 
railroads. The deadline for installing it was postponed from 2015--over 
my vehement protests and those of others on our side of the aisle in 
the Commerce Committee and on the floor of the U.S. Senate--until 2018. 
Even now, the railroads are seeking an extension to that time, saying 
that the resources aren't available.
  Well, the costs of those 300 lives lost and of the crashes that have 
resulted from derailments and other kinds of very severe mishaps due to 
excessive speed are way in excess of the costs of installing positive 
train control since 1970, since 2015, and if it is postponed again, the 
costs will exceed the expenses that we saw in the system.
  It is available now. It is fully ready for installation on railroads 
across the country. The resources aren't preventing its installation; 
it is the will and determination to do so.
  The failure of Federal authorities to require and provide support for 
positive train control is a moral choice this Nation has made. It is 
not only about dollars and cents; it is about basic moral choices, and 
those choices are a factor in those three deaths outside of Tacoma, WA. 
We know excessive speed was a factor. We know positive train control 
slows down trains when they are going too fast in zones where the limit 
is 30 miles an hour rather than the 80 miles an hour that this train 
was traveling. Regardless of driver fatigue or distraction, regardless 
of any of the other contributing sources, positive train control is 
there to stop or slow down trains when human error may lead to crashes.
  The new deadline is now 1 year away. If we do nothing else in this 
Congress, let us insist that this deadline be met without additional 
delay. Our failure to do so would be a moral failure.
  The dollars and cents required to install positive train control and 
to repair our aging and decrepit roads and bridges involve investment.
  To show you what is happening in Connecticut, very much like the rest 
of the country, we know that 78 percent of our roads are in poor or 
mediocre condition. That is a moral choice, not just a physical choice. 
It has the same kinds of consequences as failure to install positive 
train control. The cost per motorist annually is $864, which is needed 
for vehicle repairs from driving on roads that are in disrepair.
  Now, as a result of this so-called tax cut, a lot of people in 
Connecticut are going to, perhaps, see a few crumbs, a few sweeteners--
very minor deductions in their tax bill. It is nowhere near the $864 
that they are now paying because of inadequate roads and bridges. That 
is a hidden cost. It is a moral choice because it not only creates 
costs in vehicle wear and tear, it also leads to crashes that, in turn, 
take lives and cause injury.
  This legislation will put America in debt by $1.5 trillion. That is a 
moral choice because it shifts the burden of tax breaks and giveaways 
now to future generations. It also deprives us right now of funds that 
could be applied to infrastructure--rebuilding roads and bridges.
  Lest you think the Connecticut situation is an anomaly or an 
exception, the grade for our Nation as a whole in infrastructure is a 
resounding D-plus.
  I know this may seem to many of my colleagues like an 
oversimplification. Yes, it is, but it is an oversimplification with 
real facts that support it and with real consequences to the American 
people.
  When the President of the United States suggests in a tweet, as he 
did yesterday after the Tacoma tragedy, that his infrastructure program 
will be ready ``soon,'' that is ducking responsibility. It is a moral 
choice because ``soon'' has meant delays, month after month, into the 
first year of his Presidency. He can take action today. He can disavow 
this shameful program that he has supported--the tax cut that slashes 
resources for the Federal Government--and, instead, decide that 
investment is the right course--investment in roads, bridges, rail, 
broadband, VA facilities, ports, and airports. That is a moral choice 
that this tax scam makes.
  It is a tax scam with moral consequences in terms of inequality in 
this Nation. It tilts the benefits in favor of corporations and the 
wealthiest who will receive permanent tax cuts. It will hurt working 
families, students, public schools, firefighters, police officers, 
local government, and sick people, who will receive nothing but crumbs 
by comparison.
  It will desperately hurt States like Connecticut. Our State and local 
taxes will no longer be deductible above set limits; $10,000 will 
barely cover and, in fact, will fail to cover many, many of the tax 
bills that formerly could be deducted. It will impose limits on 
mortgage interest deductions that will harm our real estate industry in 
Connecticut and many other States across the country.
  Yes, there are crumbs and sweeteners, and they are temporary. They 
pale in comparison to the tremendous benefits that will go to 
corporations and the wealthiest.
  It narrows our tax base, shifting the burden, in fact, from 
corporations to individuals. It makes the Tax Code more complicated, 
not less so. It grossly increases inequality, and it steals $1.5 
trillion from our children and from us insofar as it deprives our 
national defense, as well as our infrastructure, of resources that are 
needed.
  I am a member of the Armed Services Committee, and I remember very 
well the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mike Mullen, 
saying, ``The most significant threat to our national security is our 
debt,'' which surprised me at the time. For the Chairman of the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff to say that the biggest threat to our national security 
is our national debt--how could that be? Well, having watched the 
National Defense Authorization Act year after year, constrained by 
resources that are now going to be less available because of this $1.5 
trillion debt--and larger, probably--that is created by this tax plan, 
I better understand what he meant.
  The Republicans are essentially pursuing two inherently 
irreconcilable objectives. The chairman of the Senate Armed Services 
Committee, a man whom I respect as much as anybody in this Chamber, has 
called for an additional $430 billion over the next 5 years to build up 
our military and rebuild it. I can tell you without doubt that there is 
no way to increase defense spending by $86 billion every year, as the 
chairman has said we need, while slashing Federal revenue $150 billion 
every year. The math fails. It will not work.
  So for my Republican colleagues to say that we need to rebuild, we 
need to invest in our national defense and in our military and in the 
skill training of our warriors is a fiction. It is blatant deception, 
and it is a disservice to the brave men and women who have enlisted and 
serve us in uniform now and others who will join them in the future. We 
cannot have the most advanced and strongest military in the world if we 
use the same tax code as the Cayman Islands.
  This year, our country experienced a tragic loss of life--in fact, 
the loss of more than life, needlessly, preventably. Seventeen sailors 
perished on the USS John S. McCain and the USS Fitzgerald. Two of them 
were from Connecticut. I attended ceremonies in their honor. Those 
deaths are largely attributable to a lack of resources. There may have 
been other causes, but this tax bill is a moral choice about our 
military. The failure to invest in those ships, in the training and 
necessary rest that is required for our men and women in those 
positions, will be aggravated by the debt we see here.
  Our national security is more than just military spending in the face 
of Russian cyber attacks in our elections, horrific hurricanes hitting 
Puerto Rico and Texas and Florida, and fires still burning in Western 
States. We know our military alone is not enough to keep us safe and 
secure. Those natural disasters and those challenges from our 
adversaries require investment as well, and, again, the loss of this 
$1.5 trillion to debt that will be paid largely by future generations 
is something that hobbles our ability to make our Nation safe and 
secure.
  This tax scam is morally reprehensible. It cuts taxes for the 
wealthiest

[[Page 20231]]

while jeopardizing programs that are essential to the safety and 
security of many in our Nation who are most vulnerable.
  Under current law, the GOP tax plan will trigger $25 billion in 
Medicare cuts next year alone. With this self-inflicted $1.5 trillion 
hole in our Federal deficit, we know what will come next: savage 
attacks on Social Security as well as Medicaid and Medicare. This 
assault on healthcare doesn't end with these programs. The repeal of 
the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate will raise premiums and 
eventually lead to $13 million--13 million--more uninsured Americans.
  Republicans are sabotaging these critical programs that provide care 
to the most vulnerable Americans so those at the top can avoid paying 
their fair share.
  What corporations benefit the most? There is a very simple answer. 
The ones that benefit the most with foreign cash that will be 
distributed almost certainly to their shareholders and to their CEOs 
are listed right here. In the red is the foreign cash, and the total is 
listed as well. They are the ones who are going to benefit. Apple has 
been singled out as the single largest beneficiary, but many other 
corporations around the country will benefit as well.
  The picture that I think was most powerful in assessing how these 
corporations will use this money occurred when the President's chief 
economic adviser asked a room of CEOs: How many of you will spend these 
additional resources on creating jobs? There were no more than a few 
hands raised in that room. This money will go to shareholders.
  These corporations have zero incentive to provide new jobs if there 
is no increase in demand and sales. The failure to provide real tax 
cuts--real benefits to middle-class families and to our working 
families--means that sales and demand will not lead to more jobs 
because there will be no increase in demand with the crumbs and 
pittance tax cuts that are complicated.
  So Republicans, let me say finally, are borrowing $1.5 trillion, and 
they are putting it on a credit card.
  Sometimes pictures are worth a thousand words. Here is the ``American 
Excess'' tax scam card. It will not buy you much because it is debt. 
With sincere apologies to American Express, the ``American Excess'' tax 
scam card can be used by our children--my children and your children--
as a symbol of what they are losing in opportunity costs, including the 
roads and bridges and rail that remain unrepaired; the new schools and 
airports that are unbuilt; the national defense that becomes far less 
adequate because the investment can't be made; the government programs, 
whether it is Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid that are in peril--
deeply in jeopardy because of this tax scam--and positive train control 
that can save lives and could have saved lives, in fact, in Tacoma when 
that train was traveling 80 miles an hour when the speed limit was 30. 
These opportunity costs are real. The choices to incur them are moral, 
and the debt that will have to be paid by future generations is equally 
real, and it is immoral.
  Thank you.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Connecticut.

                          ____________________