[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 162 (2016), Part 9]
[Senate]
[Pages 12847-12848]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                   UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUEST--S. 2979

  Mr. WYDEN. Madam President and colleagues, I come to the Senate floor 
today to discuss S. 2979, the Presidential Tax Transparency Act. I am 
very pleased to see that my colleague on the Finance Committee who is 
such a valuable Member, Senator Cardin, is here as well.
  In America, nobody forces you to run for President. You volunteer to 
run for President, and this year we have had a bumper crop of 
volunteers. Since Watergate, there has been a bipartisan tradition 
honored by all candidates that they would release their tax returns. 
Every Democrat, every Republican, every liberal, every conservative has 
subscribed to honoring this particular tradition. Why is it so 
important? Tax returns say so much about a candidate for the world's 
most demanding job. Rather than the spin and deception that counts as 
messaging in a Presidential campaign, the tax returns are legally 
required to be an accounting in black and white of a candidate's 
honesty, integrity, and their personal priorities.
  A return can show whether a nominee has intimate connections to 
powerful interests in foreign governments whose priorities run contrary 
to the interests of typical Americans. A return highlights important 
questions about integrity. Are you the person giving to charity or, as 
some have wondered, are you converting another donor's gift into your 
own? Are you using charities for personal gain?
  A return shows if you pay any taxes at all or if you use the 
complexity of this Byzantine Tax Code to hide your income while working 
Americans have their taxes taken out of their paycheck.
  Today--and I made it clear I am going to shortly try to get support 
for the Presidential Tax Transparency Act. Today honest taxpayers who 
dot every ``i'' and cross every ``t'' are faced with a major 
Presidential candidate who refuses to show even one single page of his 
tax return. This flouting of a tradition honored by every candidate 
since Watergate is just too dangerous to ignore.
  So shortly I will ask unanimous consent that the Senate pass S. 2979, 
the Presidential Tax Transparency Act. It is a straightforward 
proposal. It says within just over 2 weeks of becoming a nominee, at a 
party convention nominees are required to release at least 3 years of 
tax returns. If they refuse, the Treasury Secretary provides the 
returns to the Federal Election Commission and they are put online 
automatically.
  Since I introduced this bill in the spring, I was asked again and 
again what was behind my thinking. I remember talking to Senator 
Cardin, my colleague on the Finance Committee, about it. I said at 
home, through town meetings, and to colleagues here: Oh, how I wish 
this bill was not necessary. I think certainly millions of Americans 
say: Hey, there are lots of laws already. Why do we need more laws? I 
think we all could feel very proud of this 40-year, bipartisan 
voluntary tradition that all the candidates have honored. I have waited 
to bring this bill up in front of the Senate, until it was clear the 
tradition would not be honored this year.
  I believe it is time for the United States Senate to act on S. 2979, 
the Presidential Tax Transparency Act, to protect honesty, 
accountability, and transparency in our Presidential election process.
  Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Rules 
and Administration be discharged from further consideration of S. 2979; 
that the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration; that the bill 
be read a third time and passed, and the motion to reconsider be 
considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or 
debate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  The majority whip.
  Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, reserving the right to object--if my 
friend from Oregon wants to discuss transparency and bring the 
Presidential election to the floor of the U.S. Senate, I think the 
person we should start with is the former Secretary of State. She has 
had, to put it charitably, innumerable challenges on the topic of 
transparency.
  Let's just look at one. All we need to do is look at the way she 
exposed some of our Nation's most highly classified information by 
setting up a private email server in her home. The ensuing 
investigation produced nothing but stonewalling, obfuscation, and 
misleading statements she made to the American public.
  When FBI Director James Comey announced the agency was closing the 
investigation, his statements made clear that Hillary Clinton had not 
been telling the truth. She did send and she did receive classified 
information, again, at some of the various highest levels. Director 
Comey said she and her staff who aided and abetted her were ``extremely 
careless in their handling of this highly sensitive information.''
  In response, I have introduced legislation with the junior Senator 
from Colorado, Senator Gardner, to help hold her and her staff 
accountable. The bill is called the Trust Act and it would revoke the 
security clearance of any person found to have been extremely careless 
in the handling of classified information, and it would keep them from 
receiving a security clearance in the future. It would also clarify 
that when someone has been found by investigators to have been 
extremely careless in handling classified information, that is 
tantamount to gross negligence.
  So I would ask the Senator from Oregon to modify his request so S. 
2979 and S. 3135 be discharged from their respective committees and the 
Senate

[[Page 12848]]

proceed to their immediate consideration. I would ask unanimous consent 
that the bills be read a third time and passed and that the motions to 
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Will the Senator so modify his request?
  Mr. WYDEN. Reserving the right to object----
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon.
  Mr. WYDEN. Thank you, Madam President.
  First of all, it is with great disappointment and regret that I note 
that Senate Republicans are willing to throw aside a 40-year tradition 
of honesty and openness in our Presidential elections by blocking the 
Presidential Tax Transparency Act.
  With respect to their own proposal, I want to be clear on this point. 
The bill that I have authored, S. 2979, the Presidential Tax 
Transparency Act, affects all the candidates for President in an 
attempt to preserve the tradition of openness and accountability that 
is no longer being honored. The proposal offered by my colleague from 
Texas, on behalf of Senate Republicans, responds with a bill targeted 
at one candidate, a proposal that all our true national security 
experts have said would harm America's security. The briefing of our 
Presidential candidates is not just for their benefit, it is for the 
benefit of the American people so we have a smooth, democratic 
transition of power without risk to our national security.
  This attempt to hide the violation of a tradition of openness and 
accountability behind a political witch hunt ought to tell Americans 
all they need to know about Senate Republicans at this point. For that 
reason, I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
  Is there objection to the original request?
  Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
  The Senator from Maryland.
  Mr. CARDIN. Madam President, I join with Senator Wyden in my deep 
disappointment that the Republicans have objected to the continuation 
of a policy that has voluntarily been done for 40 years; that is, those 
who are running for President of the United States release their tax 
returns. I want to underscore a couple of points that were made by 
Senator Wyden. I thank him very much for his leadership on this issue.
  I just came from a hearing at the Senate Foreign Relations 
Committee--where I have the privilege of being the ranking Democrat--on 
Afghanistan. A large part of that hearing dealt with transparency, good 
governance, corruption, and anti-corruption. That is a key fundamental 
for Afghans' success. This morning I also had a chance to meet with the 
new leader of Burma. She has tremendous challenges in that emerging 
country. Transparency and anti-corruption are critically important to 
the success of that democracy.
  When the United States stands internationally for good governance, 
anti-corruption, and transparency, we first have to deal with our 
issues at home. It is hard for us to demand transparency globally when 
we ourselves fall victim to the failure to make information available 
to the public that they desperately need. Let me tell you why that is 
important. This is not theoretical. The Panama Papers indicate that 
heads of state--current heads of state and former heads of state--have 
used ways to avoid public disclosure of the gains of their office, the 
connections they have had.
  There is a reason why for 40 years we have seen the release of tax 
returns by those running for President. Before they vote, the public 
has a right to know about the potential conflicts that individual 
brings to the Office of the Presidency, the highest office in the land.
  Senator Wyden pointed out accurately that that tax return could very 
well show international contacts, international business, and offshore 
activity that the public has a right to have debated during the course 
of the campaign. It may show a Presidential candidate's use of the 
provisions within our Tax Code to pay a different tax rate or no taxes 
at all. The public has a right to know that before they cast their vote 
so they can ask questions about that. The tax return may show that 
certain statements made in regard to the use of charities are either 
appropriate or not appropriate. They have the right to debate that 
before they cast their vote.
  Senator Wyden's bill carries out current practice. I don't think 
anyone thought 6 months ago that someone would step forward to run for 
the Presidency of the United States and accept the nomination of a 
major political party without disclosing their tax returns. I don't 
think any of us thought that was at issue.
  Senator Wyden has been very patient with this bill. We have given all 
the Presidential candidates that opportunity. Secretary Clinton has 
disclosed her tax returns. Secretary Clinton has made available her 
emails through appropriate channels. That has been done. That 
transparency has been made. But there is a person running on the 
Republican side who has refused to disclose his tax returns. That is 
wrong. That denies the American people the transparency they need to 
judge the candidates and to engage in political discourse during the 
campaign, which is critically important to their decision as to who the 
next President of the United States should be.
  I am extremely disappointed that there has been an objection to 
Senator Wyden's request that we require those who want to be President 
of the United States--the highest office in this land, the highest 
office in the free world--to disclose their tax returns.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Ms. WARREN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________