[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 162 (2016), Part 7]
[Senate]
[Pages 10096-10097]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           INTERNET GAMBLING

  Mr. GRAHAM. Mr. President, in 2011, the Department of Justice's 
Office of Legal Counsel, OLC, issued a legal opinion reversing 50 years 
of interpretation of the Wire Act. Lawyers there concluded the act does 
not ban gambling over the Internet, as long as the betting is not on 
the outcome of a sporting event.
  In effect, this opinion means the Justice Department has stopped 
enforcing a law it had consistently enforced for five decades. Left on 
its own, the DOJ opinion could usher in the most fundamental change in 
gambling in our lifetimes by turning every smartphone, tablet, and 
personal computer in our country into casinos available 24/7.
  The FBI has warned online casinos are susceptible to use for money 
laundering and other criminal activity, and online casinos are bound to 
prey on children and society's most vulnerable.
  It took Congress a decade to develop the Wire Act. It took Congress 7 
additional years to enact the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement 
Act, the 2006 law giving law enforcement new tools to shut down online 
casinos. DOJ's opinion gutted both laws.
  Despite the wide-ranging implications of this opinion, there was no 
solicitation of public comment, nor any input sought from State and 
local officials. There is also no indication the Department considered 
the very significant law enforcement, social, and economic issues 
raised by Internet gambling.
  We note that a number of States have authorized Internet gambling, 
despite the fact the DOJ opinion does not carry the force of law, a 
fact confirmed by our Attorney General, who, in response to questions 
posed during her confirmation proceedings, wrote, ``I am not aware of 
any statute or regulation that gives OLC opinions the force of law.''
  The Attorney General is absolutely correct. Only Congress can change 
the Wire Act, and only the courts can interpret the act's reach.
  To make clear that the Wire Act still bans all Internet gambling, the 
committee report accompanying the CJS appropriations bill includes the 
following statement:

       Internet Gambling.--Since 1961, the Wire Act has prohibited 
     nearly all forms of gambling over interstate wires, including 
     the Internet. However, beginning in 2011, certain States 
     began to permit Internet gambling.

[[Page 10097]]

     The Committee notes that the Wire Act did not change in 2011. 
     The Committee also notes that the Supreme Court of the United 
     States has stated that ``criminal laws are for courts, not 
     for the Government, to construe.'' Abramski v. U.S., 134 
     S.Ct. 2259, 2274, 2014, internal citation omitted.

  I was pleased to join with my colleague from California, Mrs. 
Feinstein, in offering this language. I appreciate the chairman and the 
ranking member having agreed to have it included with this legislation.
  Any jurisdiction considering authorizing Internet gambling--and any 
entity seeking to participate in offering online casinos in this 
country--is well advised to consider that the Justice Department 
decision of 2011 did not change the Wire Act.
  The question of whether there should be online casinos in this Nation 
has been polled widely over the past few years. It seems that no matter 
where one goes, Internet gambling is opposed by the public by wide 
margins, even in States where there is significant support for land-
based casinos.
  The public recognizes that there is something fundamentally different 
between having to go to a destination to place a bet and having a 
casino come to you, in your own home or office on an electronic device.
  Regardless of how Senators may feel about this issue, I hope we can 
all agree that whether Internet gambling should be permitted in this 
country is a question for Congress to determine, not unelected Federal 
bureaucrats.

                          ____________________