[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 162 (2016), Part 6]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page 8752]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JARED HUFFMAN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, June 14, 2016

  Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Speaker, on Tuesday, June 7, and Wednesday, June 8, 
2016, I was absent for roll call votes 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, & 
275.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 269, H. Con. Res. 129--
Expressing support for the goal of ensuring that all Holocaust victims 
live with dignity, comfort, and security in their remaining years, and 
urging the Federal Republic of Germany to reaffirm its commitment to 
this goal through a financial commitment to comprehensively address the 
unique health and welfare needs of vulnerable Holocaust victims, 
including home care and other medically prescribed needs, as amended, I 
would have voted ``yes''.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 270, H.R. 4906--To amend title 
5, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of employees of a 
land management agency in a time-limited appointment to compete for a 
permanent appointment at any Federal agency, and for other purposes, I 
would have voted ``yes''.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 271, H.R. 4904--MEGABYTE Act of 
2016, I would have voted ``yes''.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 272, H.R. 1815--Eastern Nevada 
Land Implementation Improvement Act, I would have voted ``yes''.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 273, motion on Ordering the 
Previous Question on the Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 4775, 
H. Con. Res. 89 and H. Con. Res 112, I would have voted ``no''.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 274, H. Res. 767--Rule 
providing for consideration of H.R. 4775--Ozone Standards 
Implementation Act of 2016, H. Con. Res. 89--Expressing the sense of 
Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States 
economy, and H. Con. Res. 112--Expressing the sense of Congress 
opposing the President's proposed $10 tax on every barrel of oil, I 
would have voted ``no''.
  Had I been present for roll call vote 275, HR. 3826--Mount Hood 
Cooper Spur Land Exchange Clarification Act, I would have voted 
``yes''.

                          ____________________