[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 162 (2016), Part 1]
[House]
[Pages 1348-1349]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




         RESEARCH EXCELLENCE AND ADVANCEMENTS FOR DYSLEXIA ACT

  Mr. SMITH of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to take from 
the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 3033) to require the President's 
annual budget request to Congress each year to include a line item for 
the Research in Disabilities Education program of the National Science 
Foundation and to require the National Science Foundation to conduct 
research on dyslexia, with the Senate amendment thereto, and concur in 
the Senate amendment.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the Senate amendment.
  The Clerk read as follows:
  Senate amendment:

       Strike section 4 of the bill and insert the following:

     SEC. 4. DYSLEXIA.

       (a) In General.--Consistent with subsection (c), the 
     National Science Foundation shall support multi-directorate, 
     merit-reviewed, and competitively awarded research on the 
     science of specific learning disability, including dyslexia,

[[Page 1349]]

     such as research on the early identification of children and 
     students with dyslexia, professional development for teachers 
     and administrators of students with dyslexia, curricula and 
     educational tools needed for children with dyslexia, and 
     implementation and scaling of successful models of dyslexia 
     intervention. Research supported under this subsection shall 
     be conducted with the goal of practical application.
       (b) Awards.--To promote development of early career 
     researchers, in awarding funds under subsection (a) the 
     National Science Foundation shall prioritize applications for 
     funding submitted by early career researchers.
       (c) Coordination.--To prevent unnecessary duplication of 
     research, activities under this Act shall be coordinated with 
     similar activities supported by other Federal agencies, 
     including research funded by the Institute of Education 
     Sciences and the National Institutes of Health.
       (d) Funding.--The National Science Foundation shall devote 
     not less than $5,000,000 to research described in subsection 
     (a), which shall include not less than $2,500,000 for 
     research on the science of dyslexia, for each of fiscal years 
     2017 through 2021, subject to the availability of 
     appropriations, to come from amounts made available for the 
     Research and Related Activities account or the Education and 
     Human Resources Directorate under subsection (e). This 
     section shall be carried out using funds otherwise 
     appropriated by law after the date of enactment of this Act.
       (e) Authorization.--For each of fiscal years 2016 through 
     2021, there are authorized out of funds appropriated to the 
     National Science Foundation, $5,000,000 to carry out the 
     activities described in subsection (a).

     SEC. 5. DEFINITION OF SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY.

       In this Act, the term ``specific learning disability''--
       (1) means a disorder in 1 or more of the basic 
     psychological processes involved in understanding or in using 
     language, spoken or written, which disorder may manifest 
     itself in the imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, 
     read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations;
       (2) includes such conditions as perceptual disabilities, 
     brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and 
     developmental aphasia; and
       (3) does not include a learning problem that is primarily 
     the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities, of 
     intellectual disability, of emotional disturbance, or of 
     environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.

  Mr. SMITH of Texas (during the reading). Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous 
consent that the reading be dispensed with.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the original request 
of the gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________