[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 8]
[Senate]
[Pages 10669-10670]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. Cotton):
  S. 1707. A bill to designate the Federal building located at 617 
Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, as the ``Jacob Trieber Federal 
Building, United States Post Office, and United States Court House''; 
to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
  Mr. BOOZMAN. Mr. President, the Honorable Jacob Trieber, of Helena, 
AR, known as a ``genius lawyer and jurist,'' served as the first Jewish 
Federal judge in the United States. Born on October 6, 1853, in 
Raschkow, Prussia, a young Jacob Trieber and his family escaped the 
growing anti-Semitism in Prussia and moved to the United States. In a 
few short years they established their homestead and a family store in 
Helena, AR. In 1873, he began to study law, and 3 years later entered 
the Arkansas Bar. In 1897, he was appointed U.S. Attorney for the 
Eastern District of Arkansas in Little Rock. Three years later, on July 
26, 1900, President William McKinley appointed Jacob Trieber to the 
Federal bench, where for 27 years Judge Trieber served on the U.S. 
Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Judge Trieber was 
committed to equal justice for all, and ruled for equality for African 
Americans and women. Judge Trieber had astounding foresight. Many of 
his rulings were important to civil rights and wildlife conservation. 
Judge Trieber was also committed to his local Arkansas community and 
served as an elected official on the Helena City Council and as the 
Phillips County treasurer. Judge Trieber played an influential role in 
saving the Old State House and establishing the Arkansas State 
Tuberculosis Sanatorium. In honor of Judge Jacob Trieber, Senator 
Cotton and I are introducing this legislation that designates the 
Federal Building in Helena-West Helena, Arkansas, the ``Jacob Trieber 
Federal Building, United States Post Office, and Court House.'' Judge 
Trieber's name will appropriately mark this building and stand as a 
symbol of his significant work for not only the people of Arkansas, but 
for the entire United States.
  Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be 
printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                S. 1707

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. JACOB TRIEBER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES POST 
                   OFFICE, AND UNITED STATES COURT HOUSE.

       (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 617 
     Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, shall be known and 
     designated as the ``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United 
     States Post Office, and United States Court House''.
       (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
     document, paper, or other record of the United States to the 
     Federal building referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
     deemed to be a reference to the ``Jacob Trieber Federal 
     Building, United States Post Office, and United States Court 
     House''.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. McCain, Mr. King, and Ms. 
        Cantwell):
  S. 1709. A bill to reduce risks to the financial system by limiting 
banks' ability to engage in certain risky activities and limiting 
conflicts of interest, to reinstate certain Glass-Steagall Act 
protections that were repealed by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and for 
other purposes; to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
Affairs.

[[Page 10670]]


  Ms. WARREN. Mr. President, I rise today to speak in support of the 
21st Century Glass-Steagall Act. I am honored to join Senators McCain, 
Cantwell, and King in introducing this bill.
  Washington is a partisan place and this Congress has its share of 
partisan bills, but we have all joined together because we all want a 
more stable economy that works not just for those at the top but for 
everyone.
  Seven years ago, Wall Street's high-risk bets brought our economy to 
its knees. The Dallas Fed estimates that the total cost of the crash 
was $14 trillion. Millions of families lost their homes. Millions of 
people lost their savings. Millions of people lost their jobs. And even 
today, millions of hard-working, play-by-the-rules people are still 
struggling to survive.
  Over the past 7 years, we have made some real progress dialing back 
the risk of a future crisis. But despite that progress, the biggest 
banks continue to threaten the economy. The biggest banks are 
collectively much bigger today than they were 7 years ago. They 
continue to engage in dangerous, high-risk practices. And with each new 
headline and subsequent legal settlement, it becomes clearer that they 
keep chasing profits even if it means breaking the law.
  The big banks weren't always allowed to take on big risks while 
enjoying the benefits of taxpayer guarantees. Four years after the 1929 
Wall Street crash, Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act, which is 
best known for separating investment banks and their risk-taking from 
commercial banks that manage savings accounts, checking accounts, and 
offer other banking services.
  For 50 years, Glass-Steagall played a central role in keeping our 
country safe. Traditional banking stayed separate from high-risk Wall 
Street banking. There wasn't a single major financial crisis, and the 
financial sector helped contribute to a sustained, broad-based economic 
growth that helped build America's middle class. But the big 
traditional banks wanted the higher profits they could get from taking 
more risks, and investors in the big investment banks wanted access to 
the low-cost, insured deposits of traditional banks, so they teamed up 
to try to tear down Glass-Steagall's wall. Starting in the 1980s, 
regulators of the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of 
the Currency buckled under industry pressure and began poking bigger 
and bigger holes in the wall between investment and commercial banking, 
and, after 12 separate attempts, Congress repealed most of Glass-
Steagall in 1999.
  The 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act will rebuild the wall between 
commercial banks and investment banks, separating traditional banks 
that offer savings and checking accounts and that are insured by the 
FDIC from their riskier counterparts on Wall Street. Banks can choose: 
Take big risks using investors' money or be very careful using 
depositors' money--but no more mixing the two.
  The 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act also fills in the holes the 
regulators punched in the original Glass-Steagall, and it recognizes 
that the financial markets have become more complicated since the 
1930s, so it covers products that did not exist when Glass-Steagall was 
originally passed.
  By itself, the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act will not end too big 
to fail and implicit government subsidies, but it will make financial 
institutions smaller, safer, and move us in the right direction. By 
separating depository institutions from riskier activities, large 
financial institutions will shrink in size and won't be able to rely on 
FDIC insurance as a safety net for their high-risk activities. It will 
stop the game these banks have played for far too long--heads, the big 
banks win and take all the profits; tails, the taxpayers lose and get 
stuck with the bill.
  Our proposal has an added benefit--it is simple. It doesn't require 
thousands of pages of new rules. And better still, if we rebuilt the 
wall between commercial banks and investment banks, we could even cut 
back on some of the other rules we have in place to stop big banks from 
taking on too much risk.
  If financial institutions actually have to face the consequences of 
their business decisions, if they cannot rely on government insurance 
to subsidize their riskiest activities, then the investors in those 
institutions will have a stronger incentive to closely monitor those 
risks before they get out of hand and take down the entire economy. 
Government regulators could play a more limited role, and that is an 
outcome everyone should like.
  It has now been 7 years since the great financial crash. Most of the 
banks that were too big to fail in 2008 are even bigger now. Shortly 
after they were bailed out by the American taxpayers, these banks once 
again started raking in billions of dollars in profits. In fact, in 
2014 they posted two of their most profitable quarters in the last 20 
years. Between 2010 and 2013, the median compensation for a big-bank 
CEO was about $15 million a year while median household income in the 
United States during that same period--that is, income for the whole 
family--was barely above $50,000. The big banks and their executives 
have recovered handsomely from the crisis they helped create while too 
many other Americans are still scraping to get by.
  We weren't sent to Washington to work for the big banks. It is time 
for a banking system that serves the best interests of the American 
people, not just those few at the top. The 21st Century Glass-Steagall 
Act is an important step in the right direction, and I ask my 
colleagues to join me in supporting this bipartisan measure to 
strengthen our economy.

                          ____________________