[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 8]
[Senate]
[Pages 10378-10379]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                         TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, our great country faces yet another 
manufactured crisis. In just a few weeks from now, the end of July--and 
that is coming quickly--on July 31, the authority for the recent 
extension of the highway trust fund will expire. The U.S. Department of 
Transportation will not be able to make payments to our States for 
highways, bridges, railways. All transportation agencies will likely 
postpone or cancel roadwork during the busy summer construction season. 
Why? Because they have no money. They know the highway Surface 
Transportation Program has been stymied as a result of 33 short-term 
extensions forced upon us by the Republicans in the Senate--33. How can 
these agencies plan ahead? They can't.
  Before this crisis becomes full-blown, Democrats want to work with 
Republicans on a long-term reauthorization of the highway program. I 
know there are Members of the majority who want to do something about 
this.
  The Presiding Officer has a plan to take care of highways. Is it a 
perfect plan? Of course it is not perfect, but it sure is a good step 
forward to do something about this program, something that is long 
term.
  This crisis is about jobs, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of 
high-paying construction jobs throughout the country. That is why we 
challenged the Republican leader to move forward with a robust, long-
term surface transportation bill ahead of that deadline.
  I am pleased Republicans have joined with Democrats to schedule a 
markup--in fact, it is going on right now in the Environment and Public 
Works Committee--on a 6-year surface transportation bill. This, of 
course, is an authorization only, but what terrific work done by 
Senators Boxer and Inhofe. They are an unmatched pair usually in all 
issues that come before this body, but on this legislation they are a 
matched pair. I admire and appreciate what they are going to mark up in 
just a few minutes. It is an authorization but a big step forward.
  But next comes the need for funding what they authorize and maybe a 
little more. Their legislation will modernize our Nation's crumbling 
infrastructure. The bill the EPW Committee will consider is $275 
billion. That includes modest increases of funding over the next 6 
years. But modest increases, while important, will not allow us to make 
the investments our transportation system really needs. Every day we 
learn of new examples about the state of disrepair of our roads, 
bridges, our highways, and of course our transit systems.
  The highway trust fund is no longer sufficient to fund the 
investments we so desperately need to rebuild them. Why? Because 
people's habits have changed. Vehicles have changed. People don't 
drive--every car they have is not a gas guzzler. We have a lot of 
electric cars. We have cars that run sometimes on gasoline, sometimes 
on electricity. We have cars that run on gasoline all the time, but 
they don't burn much gasoline.
  So the trust fund, which was set to take care of all the road needs 
we have, surface transportation needs--we simply don't have the 
resources anymore, so we have to look for other resources because, I 
repeat, the highway trust fund is no longer sufficient to fund these 
investments we so desperately need to rebuild them. We know this 
because over the past few years Congress has transferred billions of 
dollars to make up the shortfall in the trust fund revenues.
  Today, it is important to thank again Senators Inhofe and Boxer for 
their leadership in marking up this bill.
  I hope the new chairmen of the Banking, Commerce, and Finance 
Committees will demonstrate the same sense of urgency and schedule 
markups for their portion of the surface transportation legislation. 
Despite the common knowledge about the expiration of surface 
transportation funding, Republicans have delayed the important work of 
writing a bipartisan bill for far too long.
  Our good citizens don't deserve another exercise in crisis management 
like we are seeing this week in the Export-Import Bank. Democrats have 
laid out a clear timetable and process for bipartisan negotiations. A 
long-term, robust bill can pass before the August recess.
  To recap, we requested a number of things, but let me mention a few 
of them: hearings in each of the authorizing committees by June 23--we 
know how that has already passed--bipartisan markups in all authorizing 
committees by July 10 that include robust increases for highways, 
transit, passenger rail, and of course all kinds of new safety programs 
and maintain those we have; and basically a long-term bill on the 
Senate floor by July 20.
  If the Republican leader continues to avoid conducting business on 
Fridays, we have only 15 session days in the month of July; that is, 15 
days to address our country's major surface

[[Page 10379]]

transportation needs and help our struggling economy by providing lots 
and lots of jobs. The clock is ticking.
  At a hearing on the funding gap last week, Senator Hatch said: ``As 
chairman of the [Finance] committee, I intend to solve this problem.''
  Well, I appreciate that very much. I am taking him at his word. 
Senate Democrats are ready to work with Republicans to grow, not cut, 
our transportation funding. But I say to my friend the senior Senator 
from Utah, please, please do something that is more than another short-
term extension. We need a 6-year bill. Every State in the Union needs 
that. We have had them in the past, but now the Republicans, learning 
how to filibuster--they have stopped, basically, everything we have 
tried to do in this regard.
  We cannot--I say to my friend from Utah--we cannot have another 
extension. I repeat, this would be the 34th short-term extension. 
Enough is enough. We need to move forward with a plan that funds our 
Nation's infrastructure, supports jobs, and grows our economy, creating 
hundreds of thousands of jobs. Americans rely on a strong 
transportation system to travel. They do this to commute and also, of 
course, to move goods across the country.
  This program was the brainchild of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the 
President of the United States, when he called upon his experience as a 
young military officer in trying to bring military equipment and men 
across the country. It was very difficult. As a young military officer 
he said: Someday, if I have any ability to change this, I will--and he 
did. The National Highway System is Eisenhower's highway system. This 
is not a program that was developed by anyone other than Dwight 
Eisenhower.
  So temporary funding for the highway trust fund leads only to 
uncertainty, slowing construction, and of course hurting economic 
development in every State of our Nation. The Republican leadership 
should act now to avoid this looming deadline and support long-term 
investment into our Nation's crumbling infrastructure.
  Mr. President, I see no one on the floor so I would ask what the 
business of the day is.

                          ____________________