[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 4]
[Senate]
[Pages 4990-4991]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




              HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGISLATION AND THE BUDGET

  Mr. REID. The Republican leader talked about two issues: one, sexual 
trafficking, and, two, the budget. His statements regarding the two are 
illogical as anything can be. Illogical.
  First of all, let's talk about sexual trafficking. Senators on this 
side of the aisle, with rare exception, are not wild about the Hyde 
amendment, but it has been the law of the land for some 30 years. And 
why is it the law of the land? Because it has been put in 
appropriations bills over these many years. But what my friend the 
Republican leader failed to mention is that if the Cornyn amendment or 
the Cornyn language were adopted, it would change women's reproduction 
rights permanently. You see, the Hyde amendment has always applied to 
taxpayer-funded money. But what Senator Cornyn, the author of this bill 
and this amendment, wants to do is direct this to private money. They 
are two totally different things. Hyde has never, ever in the past 
applied to private money--nontaxpayer dollars. So that is why my 
friend's argument is totally illogical. Illogical. It has no basis in 
fact. We are not going to stand by to enlarge this so-called Hyde 
amendment to private money.
  Now we have tried. We have tried. Ten different offers have been made 
to Senator Cornyn and Senator McConnell to work our way through this. 
There are many ways we can handle this. But they feel--my friend the 
Republican leader and the assistant Republican leader feel this is 
their opportunity to broaden Hyde. We are not going to allow that to 
happen. It would be wrong. We have made 10 separate offers of ways to 
get to yes, but Republicans appear unwilling to compromise about the 
Hyde language, and that is unfortunate.
  To carry on the illogic of the Republican leader, every organization 
has a mission statement, a summary of their goals and values. Congress 
is no different. There are mission statements that are done every year 
and they are called a budget. We have our mission statement; the 
Republicans have theirs. The budget sets forth our core values as a 
party, a statement of our values that tells the American people what we 
really care about and whose side we are on. We are committed to a 
budget that puts the middle class first, a budget that supports hard-
working families, creates jobs, and invests in our future. The 
Republicans, by contrast, are hell-bent on passing a budget that 
creates a war on the middle class and serves the interests of special 
interests and the superwealthy.
  Let's take a look at what the Senate Republican budget does. 
Remember, this is their statement of core values, and their war on the 
average American from Reno to Las Vegas to Chicago to Louisville--it 
doesn't matter where you go--is an attack on the middle class. Why do I 
say that? It deprives more than 16 million Americans of health 
coverage. That is the first thing their budget does. It devastates 
Medicare. It makes Medicare something we would not recognize, and they 
do it, of course, at the expense of America's seniors. It cuts Medicaid 
and hurts millions of families who are not able to pay for their care.
  Everyone thinks Medicaid is just for poor people. Some people don't 
think they have much value in our society and Medicaid is something 
that shouldn't get much of our attention. But a significant amount of 
Medicaid money goes to people who are in rest homes and convalescent 
centers. So the money they are whacking from Medicaid hurts not only 
the young but the old. It guts nutrition assistance. It guts food that 
can go to people who are hungry. It undermines job training and 
employment services for millions of American families. It cuts billions 
in financial aid for college students.
  The Republicans not only want to cut aid to families as it relates to 
education, but then the debts they have accumulated, which are larger 
than credit card debt--they don't want to cut them any relief 
whatsoever. We have tried that lots of times. Our budget reflects that; 
theirs doesn't.
  While the middle class is decimated by Senate Republicans--and who 
benefits? Special interests and the superrich. They are protected more 
than ever. The Republicans refuse to close a single loophole to reduce 
this deficit.
  A single tax loophole they will not touch. They will not end tax 
breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. They will not close 
loopholes for the wealthy, including hedge fund managers. They will not 
take away wasteful and unneeded tax breaks for the very powerful oil 
and gas industry. They are attacking the middle class while protecting 
the super wealthy. That is wrong.
  Now, the Republican budget is also dishonest. I heard the Republican 
leader come here and boast. He boasted about the balanced budget they 
have. That is absolutely not true. Their budget does not balance the 
budget. It is simply dishonest to say so. The Republican budget claims 
to add more money for defense, but it does not.
  It is no wonder that the New York Times called the Republican budget 
``a trillion dollar con job.'' ``A trillion dollar con job'' is the 
Republican budget. I agree with the New York Times. In the coming days, 
as we move forward toward a conference--now remember moving forward 
toward conference has become kind of a joke around here because we do 
not have conferences like we used to. That is too bad.
  There will be no meeting of the conferees. There will be no debate in 
open session as to how the budget should be changed. The Republicans 
will get to conference. There will be meetings held by the Republicans. 
Democrats will not be invited. If they are invited, it is pro forma: 
Here is what we have decided to do. The conferences, as we used to do 
them around here, do not exist. It is a rare occasion when they do.
  We will not be looking into our efforts to try to improve the budget. 
We are not looking to obstruct the process to force another all-night 
vote-arama. We could. Under the rules we could offer endless, endless 
motions to instruct: 5, 6, 50, 100, 200. We could do that. We are not 
going to do that. But we will be offering a few motions to make clear 
where we stand on important issues.
  For example, there will be an amendment that men and women who do the 
same work should be paid the same money. If my daughter works here and 
a man works here and they do the same job, they should be paid the same 
amount of money. We have tried to do that. The Republicans have 
filibustered this five times over the last few years.
  We are going to offer an amendment to provide sick leave to help 
families get through tough times. We are going to offer an amendment to 
ensure that same sex spouses have equal access to Social Security and 
veterans' benefits. We are going to offer an amendment to relieve the 
crushing burden of costly student loans. No one has worked harder on 
this issue than the assistant Democratic leader. I heard him yesterday 
talk about this at a meeting we had--the crushing, crushing costly 
student loans. We are going to offer an amendment to address the 
economic and national security threats posed by climate change.
  In the West, we are in the midst of a 15-year drought. This is the 
15th year. Lake Powell, the largest manmade lake in America, could go 
dry very quickly. Hundreds of thousands of acre feet of water will not 
go into that lake this year because of what is happening up in 
Colorado.
  So when we are done offering what we feel should be ways to improve 
this dishonest budget that the Republicans put forward, the American 
people will have no doubt which party stands with the middle class and 
which stands with the special interests and billionaires. Yes, we have 
set forth what we believe

[[Page 4991]]

are our core values, and we believe our core values are what the 
American people need.

                          ____________________