[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 3]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 3915-3916]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                   DEMOCRACY RESTORATION ACT OF 2015

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. JOHN CONYERS, JR.

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, March 19, 2015

  Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to introduce the Democracy 
Restoration Act of 2015. This legislation will serve to clarify and 
expand voting rights, as well as assist former felons with their 
reintegration into our democracy.
  The Sentencing Project reports that, since 1997, 23 states have 
amended felony disenfranchisement policies in an effort to reduce their 
restrictiveness and expand voter eligibility. These reforms have 
resulted in an estimate of 800,000 citizens regaining their voting 
rights. Yet, despite these reforms, an estimated 5.85 million people 
continue to be ineligible to vote in Federal elections, including more 
than 4 million who reside in the 35 states that still prohibit some 
combination of persons on probation, parole, and/or people who have 
completed their sentence from voting.
  I believe that there are three grave discrepancies in State laws 
regarding felony convictions that lead to unfairness in Federal 
elections. First, there is no uniform standard for voting in Federal 
elections, which leads to an egregious disparity and unequal 
participation in Federal elections based solely on where a person 
lives. Second, laws governing the restoration of voting rights after a 
felony conviction are unequal throughout the country and persons in 
some States can easily regain their voting rights while in other States 
persons effectively lose their right to vote permanently. Third, State 
disenfranchisement laws disproportionately impact ethnic minorities, 
thus adversely infringing upon citizens of these communities 
constitutional right to vote.
  These concerns about ex-offender disenfranchisement are not 
rhetorical. In the past two election cycles, flawed voter purges have 
deprived thousands of legitimate voters of their rights. For example, 
an erroneous interpretation of state law by the Ohio Secretary of State 
deprived thousands of ex-felons in that state of even the right to 
register. Only Federal law can conclusively resolve the ambiguities in 
this area plaguing our voting system.
  Like the States, Congress has recognized the need to address the 
barriers to full citizenship faced by ex-offenders. This voting 
legislation is the next step in restoring the ex-felon community to 
full citizenship. Denying voting rights to ex-offenders robs them of 
the opportunity to fully participate and contribute to their society. 
Disenfranchisement laws isolate and alienate ex-offenders, and have 
been shown to serve as one more obstacle in their attempt to 
successfully reintegrate into society. Moreover, these obstacles 
adversely impact the voting participation of their families, further 
undermining the effectiveness of our voting system.
  This legislation is a narrowly crafted effort to expand voting rights 
for ex-felons, while protecting State prerogatives to generally 
establish voting qualifications. This legislation would only apply to 
persons who have been released from prison, and it would only apply to 
federal elections. Consequently, the bill is fully consistent with 
Constitutional requirements established by the Supreme Court in a 
series of decisions upholding Federal voting rights laws.
  In past Congresses, voting restoration legislation has been supported 
by a broad coalition of groups interested in voting and civil rights, 
including the NAACP, ACLU, the National Council of Churches (National 
and Washington Office), the National Urban League, the Human Rights 
Watch and the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, among many others.
  The practice of many states denying voting rights to former felons 
represents a vestige from a time when suffrage was denied to whole 
classes of our population based on race, gender, religion, national 
origin, and property. Ex-felons who have been lawfully released from 
prisons have paid their debts to society. To continue denying them the 
ability to reclaim rights as citizens resurrects historic unenlightened 
practices of our society. Ultimately, I believe that we fail not only 
ex-offenders by denying them the right to vote, but

[[Page 3916]]

the rest of a society that has struggled throughout its history to be 
legitimate and inclusive. Just like poll taxes and literacy tests, it 
is long past time that these restrictions be relegated to unenlightened 
history.

                          ____________________