[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 2]
[House]
[Page 2100]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                    CONTINUED REMITTANCES TO SOMALIA

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
Minnesota (Mr. Ellison) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. ELLISON. Mr. Speaker, my question to all my colleagues today as I 
stand before this body is: If we could prevent a humanitarian disaster, 
would we? Should we?
  Right now, Somalia may be on the brink of a preventable humanitarian 
disaster. My district happens to be home to one of the largest Somali 
American communities in the world, and it is certainly the largest in 
the Western Hemisphere.
  My constituents have come to me and have explained in very detailed 
and moving ways that it is time for us to figure out this problem that 
we have in the United States with helping people remit money that they 
have earned to their loved ones in the Horn of Africa.
  Somali Americans in my district are proud of the progress Somalia has 
made, as I am and many people around the world are. This is a nation 
that, for over two decades, had civil war but now has a President, a 
legislature, and is planning for elections in 2016.
  This country is fighting off al Shabaab, a terrorist organization in 
league with al Qaeda, and this nation has successfully fought off 
famine and want of many kinds. Now, they are on another kind of 
problem, and this problem has to do with remittances and the ability of 
Somali Americans to send money to their loved ones.
  It is important to understand that the progress they have made is 
fragile. We, in the United States, don't need to worry about sending 
money there right now, although we should, and we have, and we are. We 
need to just get out of the way to allow Somali Americans to send money 
to their own loved ones, and our financial system is inhibiting that.
  Every year, Somali Americans send about $215 million to Somalia, a 
figure comparable to the entire U.S. aid package, which is 
approximately about $200 million a year. Individual Somali Americans 
send more money than the whole Government of the United States sends 
there, and that vital pipeline is lifesaving money that is shut off now 
as we speak.
  The bank that provided 60 percent of the remittances or funds sent to 
Somalia closed accounts of businesses that transfer money from the U.S. 
to Somalia, and this is catastrophic.
  Now, Somali Americans cannot send money to their loved ones, and 
Somalis can no longer receive money that they depend on for food, for 
school fees, for medical bills. Many of the financial institutions in 
the United States have chosen to avoid serving money services 
businesses that send money to vulnerable nations like Somalia, due to 
concern that the money could find its way into bank accounts of 
unsavory money launderers.
  The goal of the U.S. financial regulator is good. We want to keep 
money from the money launderers and the terrorists; but do we arrive at 
a point where our regulation is so tight that even the legitimate money 
that we want to flow is being cut off?
  I am calling on our government to get together--Treasury, the Office 
of the Comptroller of the Currency, State Department--and have a real 
conversation, how we can stop the bad money but also let the good money 
flow.
  As I said, Somalia depends upon this money. It is a very fragile 
state. It is emerging from being a failed state. If they cut the 
remittances off, we will see catastrophic results.
  One of those catastrophic results will be an opening to groups like 
al Shabaab, a terrorist group that argues that the United States and 
the West generally don't want to help Somalia.
  We need to stop them from using that recruiting message by figuring 
out how we can achieve our goals of stopping bad money from flowing and 
allowing good money to flow. For years, I have been asking for agencies 
to work with me to prevent this foreseeable tragedy. We need to be 
creative about finding a solution.
  The Federal Reserve Bank of New York could use its wire service to 
process transfers to east Africa; that is a possibility. We could 
follow the example of the United Kingdom and set up a safe corridors 
program for banks to safely transfer money while managing risk. We 
could provide proactive training and assistance for banks that want to 
serve east African communities. There is no shortage of ideas.
  I urge our government to sit down at a table and figure out a way to 
stop the money launderers and the bad money from flowing, but to 
certainly allow legitimate remittances to flow. We could prevent a 
catastrophe if we do.

                          ____________________