[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 15]
[Senate]
[Pages 21464-21467]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                     MAINTAINING AMERICA'S DEFENSE

  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, today I wish to pay tribute to a man who 
has dutifully served our Nation as a public servant for more than 30 
years--Mr. John B. Johns. John will retire from his role as the Deputy 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Maintenance Policy and Programs at 
the end of this year. We will miss his leadership, his tenacity in 
tackling the impossible, and his courage in the face of adversity.
  I have had the privilege of knowing John for several years and have 
always been amazed at his commitment to our country and his devotion to 
our military. In his current role, he is responsible for the oversight 
of the Department of Defense's maintenance program that exceeds an 
annual budget of $80 billion. During his distinguished career, John has 
been deployed twice--first to Iraq in 2010, where he served as the 
director of the training and advisory mission and the director of 
logistics for the Iraqi Security Forces; and second to Afghanistan in 
2013, where he served as the executive director of Afghan National 
Security Forces Sustainment for the International Security Assistance 
Force.
  One of John's primary duties in his current position is to host the 
annual Department of Defense Maintenance Symposium that recognizes 
excellence in maintenance activities within the Armed Services and the 
Coast Guard. During this event, the Department recognizes leaders and 
organizations for the superior service they render to promote the 
readiness of the U.S. military. I wanted to read the remarks that John 
offered at this year's symposium last week. The title of John's address 
is ``Maintaining America's Defense.'' His words are as follows:
  ``For seven years this community has been very kind to me; you have 
been gracious and patient as I spoke from this stage. I now ask you to 
indulge me one last time as I speak of maintaining America's defense.
  Brave warriors have fought and died, and their brothers and sisters 
stand watch today, in harm's way, to both secure and maintain peace, to 
deter and defeat forces that are committed to a future fundamentally 
different than the one you and I envision. The world is a complex, 
dangerous, and unstable place with evolving threats, both new and old. 
The reality is we are facing skilled, determined enemies that would 
just as soon strike at us as they would take a breath. They clearly do 
not share the same view on humanity, nor the value of life, as we do. 
This environment demands the flexibility, agility and lethality that 
only our United States Military can provide.
  From the first shots that signaled the birth of our country, men at 
arms have served as an instrument of state, and their strength, as 
individuals and as a force, have enabled and secured both victory and 
peace. Today, the presence of United States Forces, controlling the 
battle space, conducting

[[Page 21465]]

strike operations with the ability to see but remain unseen, to 
dominate the land, sea, and air, to rain fire and destruction, provide 
clarity to all those that contemplate harm to us or our interests. That 
aggression will not be tolerated. But, as you know, we have not always 
acted properly, nor responded with appropriate speed, to events in the 
world that have demanded our attention. We make many mistakes, and it 
is true we are slow to anger. But, once our limit has been breached and 
restraint abandoned, there is nothing on this planet, nor has there 
ever been, like the hell unleashed from coiled fury of the United 
States Military.
  You should all be proud of the role you play in maintaining that 
capability--most recently, maintaining readiness of our forces over a 
decade of continuous combat, in two complex theaters, in unforgiving 
environments, while maintaining a credible presence throughout the rest 
of the world. You enabled this, and for that, you should be proud. All 
of you in this room know a ship not ready to sail, or an aircraft not 
ready to fly, has no value. And, since we have had the need for 
weapons, we have had the need for those that maintain them. This 
eternal bond is a covenant, a sacred promise, between those that 
generate readiness and those that apply it, and we seal this covenant 
with a commitment to excellence. All of you in this room, and those you 
represent, should be rightfully proud, an embodiment of this covenant 
and commitment, reminding any who mistakenly underestimate the power 
and will of our United States Military that we are capable of striking 
with speed and violence.
  So where, then, should we expect the approach of danger; what will be 
its origin? I suggest our greatest enemy, our greatest threat, is not 
Russia; our greatest enemy is not ISIS, ISIL, DEASH, or whatever we are 
calling them now; it's not China, it's not North Korea, and it's 
certainly not climate change. Yes, of course, they are all threats; I 
would never say they're not. But they are born of something much more 
fundamental. I suggest our greatest threat is the dangerous mix of 
mediocrity, poor judgment, and tolerance--here, on our ground.
  In his Lyceum address, Lincoln said, `Shall we expect some 
transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? 
Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all 
the treasure of the earth in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for 
a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio or make a 
track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point 
then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer--If it ever 
reach us, it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If 
destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author, and finisher. 
As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by 
suicide.'
  Our greatest enemy is the dangerous mix of tolerance and mediocrity--
mediocrity fueled by those lacking honor, judgment, courage and 
determination, and the tyranny of tolerance characterized by slumbering 
apathy, a comfortable denial of reality, and paralyzing bureaucracy. 
This toxic mix, this deadly combination, creates or fuels all other 
threats, allowing what would be a simple challenge to evolve into 
danger. Our enemies demand greatness of us; our partners in the world, 
to which we have made commitments, demand greatness of us; our 
soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, coastguardsmen demand greatness of 
us; those that have made the ultimate sacrifice demand greatness of us. 
And we should demand it from ourselves. But, absent clear and present 
danger, we approach greatness hesitantly and inefficiently, only when 
compelled, operating at the edge of greatness, at risk of losing it.
  We have many examples of those who have achieved greatness. Some we 
will recognize tonight just as we have in the past. And we should 
continue to recognize those that rise above and achieve truly uncommon 
things, but contemplate that word ``uncommon.'' It means some stand on 
the pinnacle of true greatness and others do not. As hard as that is to 
accept, we all know it to be true, and the slope to that pinnacle of 
greatness is steep. Many never make it to the top, and many can't find 
a way to stay there. It takes much to climb and takes even more to 
remain there. Those that stand at the top, however, are those that 
change the world. They set an uncommon path to achieve uncommon things, 
and we see this greatness through their achievements and their 
character.
  But let's be careful because they are not the only ones with claims 
on the future. Those at the bottom, and even those that occupy the 
middle ground, can also claim this power to change the world but, 
clearly, not in the same way as we desire. So what differentiates those 
that carry the banner of greatness? What allows those to scale that 
slope to the peak of performance? What robs those at the bottom from 
the ability to climb? What defines the middle ground of mediocrity? 
What do we need to know about standing on the pinnacle? And how do we 
avoid a fall from greatness?
  For this I refer to four words used so well by John F. Kennedy in a 
speech to the Massachusetts State Legislature one month before he was 
inaugurated as President of the United States. He said, `When the High 
Court of History sits in judgment of us all, no matter our station, our 
success or failure, will be measured by the answer to four questions. 
Were we truly men of honor? Were we truly men of judgment? Were we 
truly men of courage? And, were we truly men of determination?'
  Honor--to do the right thing and treat others with respect. 
Judgment--to see the future and the path to get there. Courage--to take 
action and speak the truth. Determination--to produce required results 
and finish what we start. These are the words that define greatness; 
words that serve as our test that guide our every thought, our every 
decision, our every action; words that should determine who we consider 
friends with whom we surround ourselves and how we choose leaders; 
words that should fill both our minds and our hearts. And where we fall 
on the scale defined by these words will determine not only our success 
or failure as individuals but also our contribution to our 
organizations, our country, and the world. Where we fall on this scale 
will determine our legacy.
  There is much at stake and we cannot afford to aspire to anything 
less than greatness. And we should remember our actions, or inaction, 
affect the strength of our military, the posture of our country, and 
the security of the world. I would not be speaking to you this way if 
they did not, if somehow the world spun on, immune to our words and 
behavior, but that is not the case. Every day we send soldiers, 
marines, sailors, airmen, and coastguardsmen into harm's way. We send 
them to defeat an enemy that tests the will of our United States 
Military. We send them to provide aid and comfort to those in need, and 
we send them to mature foreign security forces and governments 
struggling to shape their own destiny. In executing these missions they 
not only secure our liberty but also serve as the single greatest 
symbol of liberty in the world. Collectively, they are the most capable 
force that has ever existed. Every day they signal to a world at war 
that both the hand of compassion and the sword of justice extend across 
the world.
  There is great honor in this, and many have worn that badge. Many of 
those are still with us, but too many are not, having paid the ultimate 
price, made the ultimate sacrifice in the service of our country. But, 
after all we have done and the price we have paid, the world remains a 
chaotic, complex, and dangerous place. To see this all you have to do 
is pay even a little attention to the situations in Iraq, Syria, Iran, 
Afghanistan, Russia, Ukraine, Western Pacific, Nigeria, Libya, in our 
board rooms, on our production floors, in our class rooms, on our 
televisions, and in our governments.
  Now, I could say, let's just all work it out. Let's bring everybody 
together on any infinite number of problems, conflicts, disagreements, 
and just work through them. How simple that sounds. Surely that would 
work. But haven't we tried that before? How many times

[[Page 21466]]

have we tried that before? And, yet, here we are still facing some of 
the most vexing problems we have ever faced. In fact, at times it seems 
that we are reliving some things we thought we had solved, only to see 
them re-emerge. Among many questions we must ask--why has it taken over 
a decade to develop the sustainment strategy for our new strike 
fighter, figure out the basic rules that govern a global spares pool, 
and appropriately budget to stand up supporting depot maintenance 
capability? Why, after diligent collaboration and full transparency, 
could the Department, Industry, and Congress, with all our might, find 
ourselves incapable of passing common-sense revisions to the depot 
maintenance-related statutes that would have benefited all of us? Why, 
after over half a decade and endless debate, could we not implement an 
enterprise, performance-based approach integrating a collection of 
individually executed contracts across the Military Departments that 
would have offered greatly improved supply availability and reduced 
cost? Why have we seen nearly a decade-long decline in naval aviation 
readiness with misleading and confusing explanations for root causes 
and corrective actions, from denial that there even is a problem to the 
use of false narratives underlying recovery strategies? Why, after a 
completely integrated, multi-service team approach, taking nearly half 
a decade, can we not make a much-needed unmanned air system software 
depot source of repair assignment? And why, after a decade long effort 
to develop the capability and capacity of the Iraqi and Afghan Security 
Forces, have we seen the near complete disintegration of those forces 
in Iraq and Afghanistan, defying all comprehension, a failed supply 
system, and a dysfunctional maintenance strategy that violates all 
reasonable logic?
  How is this possible? Why do we tolerate this? Some may think my 
thoughts lack sophistication or I simply don't understand. I'll 
acknowledge that we face complex situations, but I assure you, I 
understand all too well.
  The fact is we tolerate too much. We tolerate mediocrity or even 
incompetence. We tolerate lies and half-truths. We tolerate 
irresponsible self-interest. We tolerate political expediency. We 
tolerate any other innumerable demonstrations of misbehavior. But let's 
not confuse tolerance with much needed compassion, empathy, and 
flexibility. Certainly, we need to see other perspectives and accept 
alternative paths. And we know empathy and flexibility are key 
ingredients in collaboration, but that doesn't mean we need to tolerate 
things that are fundamentally wrong, things that will lead us down the 
path to ruin. I see no honor in this, no judgment, no courage.
  In these cases, we must have absolutely no tolerance--no tolerance 
for incompetence, no tolerance for those without integrity, and no 
tolerance for self-interest that overrides the greater good. And, just 
to be clear, this is purely and simply an issue of leadership. Some may 
not see it. And some may be misled, burdened with the inability to 
differentiate between true leadership and those impersonating leaders. 
But those that are tired of political correctness, the endless pursuit 
of consensus, unprofessional behavior, and paralyzing bureaucracy, they 
understand.
  And those that expect vision, those that expect strategy, those that 
expect executable plans, those that expect fairness, honor, judgment, 
courage, determination from our leaders, they understand. And we should 
certainly not tolerate the behaviors of the few with cavalier disregard 
of the facts, the few that masquerade as leaders, and those that can't 
recognize it or lack the will to deal with it as they should, those 
that are threatened by honesty and candor that send the signal that 
this is ok and that even reward it. Tolerance here is insidious and 
dangerous. It doesn't take many examples to poison a culture and affect 
generations. We cannot afford to let this happen. We cannot afford 
anything less than greatness. This is why I am speaking this way.
  We must have the courage to recognize good performance, regardless of 
whether it is politically correct, and deal appropriately with bad 
performance. We must have the courage to speak truth to those below us, 
around us, and above us. Ambiguity, half-truths, misleading messages, 
and lies demonstrate poor judgment and lack of courage. Tolerance of 
this, at best, creates inefficiency and weakness, and at its worst, 
danger. We all should have the judgment and courage to recognize this, 
call it for what it is, and dedicate ourselves to eliminating it.
  In this moment we require leaders. We require leaders that are 
capable of seeing new patterns in complexity and conflict and applying 
new methods to achieve unconventional and uncommon outcomes. We need 
leaders at all levels that have no tolerance for status quo and 
mediocrity. We need leaders with competence and courage, with the 
ability to learn and adapt quickly. We need leaders that are 
comfortable making decisions and taking action in the face of 
significant ambiguity, unclear guidance, and near impossible timelines. 
We need leaders that know how to generate both unity of command and 
unity of effort. It remains all our duty to recognize and contribute to 
the greater good. We must be able to understand the interests of others 
and exercise the flexibility and skill in accommodating those interests 
while protecting our own.
  And just because we can see the need for collaboration doesn't mean 
we can just wish it into being. There is a science to collaboration and 
we must be well practiced at it. In fact, we should all be experts 
because we must accept the simple fact that no truly great thing is 
achievable without others. No great accomplishment was, or ever will 
be, possible without collaborative effort. In fact, the more complex a 
thing, the more challenges we face, the more disciplines are involved, 
the more integration is required, and the more collaboration is 
demanded. It is time for collaboration based on respect--respect for 
well-argued positions, respect for expertise, respect for remarkable 
performance. It is time for collaboration rooted in both art and 
science. It is time to put in place principles that bind us by 
covenants and not just contracts or legal documents. It is time to 
evolve from practitioners to experts and evangelists.
  There is clearly science in this, but science is not enough. We need 
the `artist.' We need the artist to apply the principals of this 
science. Like any great piece of art, it is not simply a collection of 
canvas and paint applied in the correct order. There is an ingredient 
that only the artist can provide, an ingredient that differentiates a 
common work from one that is uncommon. And what makes relationships so 
difficult is that more than one person is painting on the canvas at the 
same time and, still, the result must look as though only one artist 
held the brush. We need the artists; we need the leaders that know this 
and have the skill to execute it.
  It is time, it is always the time, to carefully and ruthlessly choose 
these leaders--leaders that understand what I have just said; leaders 
that demonstrate extraordinary courage, honor, determination, and 
judgment; leaders that understand how to nurture and protect 
innovation; leaders that understand and can enable collaboration. For 
it will be only those leaders that will take us to new heights of 
performance and to deeper connections between all parties necessary to 
solve the most complex problems of our time. It will be only those 
leaders that will move us aggressively forward in the right direction, 
intolerant of misbehavior and relentless in the pursuit of excellence.
  For us, we see this as our duty. We are determined to the produce 
results that are required by our military and our country--to fight and 
win on any battlefield, of any kind, at any time. The future is ours to 
shape. And make no mistake, the high court of history will hold each of 
us accountable with the lives of those we send to stand on future 
battlefields. I ask you to consider what I have just said.
  In this job I have had the honor to see the work of patriots, those 
that generate readiness for those that apply it, to support and serve 
beside those

[[Page 21467]]

that stand in harm's way, and to place coins in the hands of thousands 
that embody the words honor, judgment, courage, and determination. And 
what is left for me to do now is simply say thank you. Thank you to 
those that secure our freedom, no matter their position. Thank you to 
those for which I have great admiration and to which I will always be 
in debt.''
  John's speech is a lesson to us all. I personally will strive to 
answer the call and live up to the virtues he praises: honor, judgment, 
courage, and determination. As I stated in a video message to this 
year's symposium attendees, I count myself fortunate and blessed to 
call John a friend and wish him continued success in his future 
endeavors.
  Thank you.

                          ____________________