[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 14]
[Senate]
[Pages 20244-20249]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                 HIGHER EDUCATION EXTENSION ACT OF 2015

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be 
allowed to enter into a colloquy with Senators Ayotte, Baldwin, Casey, 
and Portman.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. If it is agreeable to Senators, I will make a few 
remarks introducing the subject of the colloquy, and then the Senators 
will speak in that order. I am here today to talk about the Federal 
Perkins Loan Program Extension Act of 2015, which is a substitute to 
H.R. 3594. I have a bill which has been taken to the desk.
  The original sponsors of the bill, which I will ask to be considered 
at the conclusion of the colloquy, are Senators Ayotte, Baldwin, 
Johnson, Casey, Cochran, Boozman, and me. We have debated the Perkins 
loan several times on the floor of the Senate. Twice, I have objected 
to the House bill to extend the Perkins Loan Program. This is a program 
that was set to expire in 2012, since the 1998 reauthorization of the 
Higher Education Act.
  That date was not extended the last time we reauthorized the Higher 
Education Act. This is a program that, in 1998, the Congress and the 
President decided would expire in 2012. The expiration of the loan 
program should not have been a surprise to anybody. It has not received 
appropriations since 2004.
  The Department of Education reminded institutions that the program 
was expiring earlier this year. I objected to the extension on the 
grounds that the current Federal loan program--one that all students, 
not select students, are able to use--has a lower interest late and 
better repayment options than the Perkins Loan Program. I objected 
because I believed there should only be one Federal loan program for 
undergraduate students, as well as one for graduate students, and one 
for parents.
  That was the testimony we received in our education committee, the 
HELP Committee. Senator Bennet and I and a bipartisan group of Senators 
have introduced something called the FAST Act, which would, in a 
variety of ways, simplify the ability of students to apply for Federal 
student aid. One of those ways is to simplify the maze of student loans 
that are available to students today.
  Sometimes students end up with more loans than they even know they 
have. Then they have trouble paying them back. However, in recent 
weeks, I have had many conversations with Senators. Some of them are on 
the floor today and are Members of this colloquy, who have suggested to 
me they would like to have the Perkins Loan Program extended until we 
can address it in the Higher Education Reauthorization Act.
  Senator Ayotte, Senator Baldwin, Senator Collins, Senator Casey, 
Senator Johnson, Senator Portman, and Senator Blumenthal are some of 
the Senators who have eloquently made that case on the floor of the 
Senate. They came and argued the merits of the Perkins Loan Program. 
Most of the arguments relied on the use of these loans by students to 
provide for financing up to a student's full cost of attendance to meet 
a gap in funding that is above their direct Federal loan limits for the 
very neediest students; or they argued it was an important resource to 
students in urgent circumstances such as when a student's parent loses 
a job.
  I listened to these Senators. I have listened to university 
presidents and others who have talked with me about it. As a result, 
today I come here with what I believe is a fair compromise, cosponsored 
by the Senators that I mentioned, to address the specific issues 
raised.
  We propose a 2-year extension of the Perkins Loan Program while we 
work on a long-term solution for simplifying the student aid program. 
This extension will give us time to move forward on the Higher 
Education Act reauthorization next year, and come to a consensus on how 
to simplify the Federal student aid program, which has become so 
complicated that many students will not even apply for loans, and many 
of those who do don't realize the opportunities they have to pay the 
loans back according to very generous terms.
  That being said, I think it is important for me to say that I am 
still, frankly, skeptical of the merits of this duplicative loan 
program, which only serves 5 percent of all student loan borrowers and 
amounts to a little over one-half of 1 percent of all the outstanding 
federal student loans we have in the country today. The program 
provides an average loan of about $2,000 and illustrates the 
complicated mess our student loan system is in today.
  My colleagues, cosponsors, and I have worked on this compromise to 
extend the Perkins Loan Program for 2 years for all eligible 
undergraduates and 1 year for current graduate students who have 
already received a Perkins loan for the graduate degree they are 
pursuing.
  This is what the substitute does. It extends the Perkins Loan Program 
until September 30, 2017, for all eligible undergraduates. It provides 
1 year of additional Perkins loans to graduate students who have 
already received a Perkins loan.
  Under the Direct Grad PLUS Loan Program, graduate students have the 
ability to borrow up to the cost of attendance annually and have no 
aggregate or lifetime loan limits. In other words, you don't need the 
Perkins loan as a graduate student to meet costs because you can get as 
much money as you would need under the regular direct loan system.
  The bill requires that the institutions award the maximum annual 
limit of subsidized direct loans prior to awarding a Perkins loan for 
current undergraduate Perkins loan borrowers.
  It requires that institutions award the maximum annual limit of both 
subsidized and unsubsidized direct loans prior to awarding a Perkins 
loan for new undergraduate Perkins loan borrowers.
  It requires the institution to disclose to Perkins loan borrowers the 
following: that the program is ending; next, that this loan is not 
eligible for certain repayment and forgiveness benefits available to 
borrowers utilizing the Direct Loan Program.
  For an undergraduate, the interest rate is lower in the Direct Loan 
Program and they have a more generous way to repay the loan than under 
the Perkins loan. We want the Perkins loan borrowers to know that.
  We want them to know they may consolidate their Perkins loan into a 
Federal direct loan to receive the benefits of the Direct Loan Program; 
that is, the more generous repayment terms.
  We want them to know that Federal direct loans and Perkins loans have 
different interest rates.
  We want them to know that if they are receiving a Perkins loan as an 
undergraduate today and they have received one in the past, that their 
institution has already awarded all subsidized Federal direct loans for 
which they may be eligible for that year. In other words, the Perkins 
loan is their second loan.
  Many students borrow more than they should and then have trouble 
paying it back. We want them to know

[[Page 20245]]

that if they are receiving a Perkins loan for the first time, their 
institution has already awarded all subsidized and unsubsidized Federal 
direct loans for which they were eligible that year and that this is 
their third loan.
  If this whole Federal student aid system sounds complicated, it is.
  There are millions of students across our country who take advantage 
of generous Federal grants and loans--more than $30 billion in grants 
that they don't have to pay back every year. There is a total 
outstanding debt of federal student loans of $1.2 trillion, almost $100 
billion in new loans every year. However, it is such a maze and so 
complicated that many students don't understand how much they are 
borrowing. So that was my purpose in objecting to an automatic 
extension of the Perkins loan without thinking about it in terms of how 
we simplify it and make it easier for students to understand the 
tangled maze of loans in the Federal student aid system.
  I thank my colleagues who are here today for being so eloquent and so 
aggressive in pointing out the benefits of the Perkins Loan Program and 
for coming up with the suggestion that we find a fair compromise so 
that over the next 2 years the Perkins Loan Program will continue but 
that during that time, both our education committee and the full Senate 
and the House will have a chance to review and make simpler the Federal 
system of grants and loans for students who attend our 6,000 colleges 
and universities in the country.
  At this point, I recognize Senator Ayotte of New Hampshire, who was 
one of the first to come to the floor and very persuasively argue about 
the importance of some continuation of the Perkins Loan Program.
  Ms. AYOTTE. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Tennessee. The 
Perkins loan is a very important loan program to people in New 
Hampshire and to 5,000 students in New Hampshire who are current 
recipients.
  While I know my colleagues who are on the floor who have fought so 
hard for this--Senator Baldwin, Senator Casey, and Senator Portman--
would have preferred that the Senate take up and pass the House's 
Higher Education Extension Act prior to Perkins expiring, because all 
of us were on the floor on September 29 as well, I do very much 
appreciate the spirit of compromise that the Senator from Tennessee has 
shown in working with us to extend this very important loan program for 
2 years, and I thank him for that and for not letting this expire.
  I thank my colleagues on the floor who have fought so hard for the 
students in their States who, like the students in New Hampshire, the 
5,000 students who received a Perkins loan during the last academic 
year--this is very important to those students. I have heard from them, 
the colleges, universities, and financial aid administrators in New 
Hampshire, who have urged that it is very important, especially before 
we end the year with the Perkins Loan Program expired, that we pass 
this extension.
  Certainly I look forward to continuing to work to make sure that all 
of our student loan programs are easier for people to use; that they 
are simpler; and that we make sure young people in this country and 
those who are returning to education as well--perhaps in a change of 
career or a new course in their life--that they get the opportunity, no 
matter where they come from or their economic background, to reach 
their full potential in this country because that is the essence of the 
American dream.
  Again, this program is very important to my home State. This program 
is also important to half a million students across the country. It 
hits a lot of students.
  Unfortunately, in my home State of New Hampshire, we have the 
distinction of having the highest average student loan debt in the 
country. So every bit helps students. These 5,000 students in New 
Hampshire--I want them to know this program will continue, and I want 
to make sure the people of New Hampshire understand that I am going to 
continue to fight for access for all of our students in New Hampshire 
and those who want to have better educational opportunities to better 
their lives and reach their full potential.
  I thank the Senator from Tennessee, and certainly I thank the other 
Senators who are on the floor on a bipartisan basis who fought so hard 
for the Perkins loan extension.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from New Hampshire. 
She has been a passionate advocate for the Perkins loan recipients in 
New Hampshire and across this country and played a major role in 
developing this 2-year compromise that permits us to continue the 
program while we look at the future.
  Senator Baldwin of Wisconsin was one of the first on the floor to 
point out the importance of passing the House bill and dealing with 
this issue. She is a member of the Senate's education committee, what 
we call the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. Both she 
and her colleague from Wisconsin, Senator Johnson, have vigorously 
advocated for an extension of the Perkins Loan Program. I thank Senator 
Baldwin for her hard work and look forward to working with her not just 
on passing this bill but working in the committee to come to a proper 
resolution on student aid.
  Ms. BALDWIN. I thank the chairman for this colloquy and for the 
moment at which we have now arrived.
  Mr. President, I rise to speak about the Perkins Loan Program--a 
vital investment in students that has been successful in helping 
Americans access affordable higher education and pursue their dreams.
  Due to Senate inaction, the Perkins Loan Program lapsed at the end of 
September. I have twice come to the floor to urge my colleagues to take 
action and extend this critical student loan program which has helped 
literally millions of America's low-income students for more than half 
a century.
  I am proud to have earned the support of a strong bipartisan majority 
in the Senate to continue this investment. Since the program's 
expiration, a growing chorus of advocates, students, and colleges and 
universities have joined our bipartisan coalition in calling on the 
Senate to act.
  As has been well documented, my friend Chairman Alexander and I have 
had our differences on this issue. As he just shared, he has objected 
to my previous efforts to revive the Perkins Loan Program due to his 
concerns with the program that he wanted to address as a part of the 
discussion about reauthorizing the Higher Education Act--a discussion, 
by the way, I very much look forward to. But despite his prior 
objections, I have certainly remained firm in the belief that we must 
act now to help students, even as we look toward that future 
conversation on higher education starting at the education committee 
and then proceeding through the Congress.
  I continue to work with my Republican colleagues and Democratic 
colleagues--especially those Republican colleagues who had concerns 
with the program--in order to find an interim path forward.
  I am so pleased that we are here today with a bipartisan compromise 
that provides a 2-year extension of the Perkins Loan Program. The 
compromise before us today is not perfect, and this is not the 
legislation I would have written on my own. However, today we have 
found a bipartisan solution that breaks the gridlock and will revive 
the Perkins Loan Program, providing critical support to students across 
America who were left in the lurch when the program expired this fall.
  This extension provides current and new undergraduate borrowers with 
access to Perkins loans through September 30 of the year 2017, allowing 
them to complete both the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 academic years with 
the support of this important program. In addition, it provides current 
graduate students with a Perkins loan an additional year of eligibility 
through September 30, 2016, allowing them to complete the 2016-2017 
academic year with the support of Perkins. Like the 1-year extension 
measure which the House adopted by voice vote earlier this fall, this 
2-year extension is fully paid for.
  I thank Chairman Alexander for working with me and Ranking Member

[[Page 20246]]

Murray to address his concerns and to reach this compromise which we 
expect the Senate to pass in short order.
  I also thank my strong allies in this fight: Senator Murray, Senator 
Casey, Senator Portman, Senator Ayotte, Senator Collins, and many other 
supporters of the Perkins Loan Program in the Senate.
  I also thank our partners on the House Education and the Workforce 
Committee, Chairman Kline and Ranking Member Scott, who supported 
extending the Perkins Program. I am hopeful they will push this 
legislation across the finish line before Congress leaves for the year.
  Since 1958, the Federal Perkins Loan Program has been successfully 
helping Americans access affordable higher education with low-interest 
loans for students who cannot borrow or afford more expensive private 
student loans.
  In Wisconsin, the program provides more than 20,000 low-income 
students with more than $41 million in aid, students such as Andrew, a 
current student at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point campus. 
Without the support of his Perkins loan, Andrew said he would not have 
had the means to attend college with the little to no income at his 
disposal. Today, not only is Andrew making the dean's list every 
semester, but he also has his sights set on attending the law school at 
the University of Wisconsin. Andrew said: ``Without the assistance I 
get from the Perkins Loan I would be forced to either take out other 
high-interest loans, delay my graduation rate, or drop out--which is 
the last thing I want to do.''
  I am pleased that we have reached an agreement to extend this program 
for 2 years to help students just like Andrew. I look forward to 
working with my colleagues on the HELP Committee to ensure that campus-
based programs like Perkins are a part of the future of Federal support 
for higher education.
  Again, I thank the chairman for his colloquy and his hard work on 
reaching this resolution for the moment and look forward to the larger 
debate in the Education Committee when we reconvene next year.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Wisconsin. 
This is the second time in 2 weeks that she has played a role in an 
important bipartisan decision on the floor of the Senate regarding 
education. She has made a major contribution to our Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act, and through her willingness to work in a 
bipartisan way with other Senators who she mentioned, we have been able 
to get a bipartisan result. Hopefully, it will be passed by the end of 
the year, and then we will work together in committee to find the right 
solution.
  No Member came more quickly to me to talk about the Perkins Loan 
Program than did the Senator from Ohio, Rob Portman, who has an eye for 
the budget with his broad experience as Director of the budget and with 
a large number of colleges and universities in Ohio. He is here today 
to discuss the Perkins Loan Program, along with Senator Baldwin, 
Senator Ayotte, and Senator Casey.
  Mr. PORTMAN. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Tennessee. I 
appreciate his work and help to ensure these kids are not going to be 
left in the lurch. There are kids in the State of Ohio who are 
expecting to get their Perkins loans this January as they go into the 
next semester, and there were certainly thousands of young people who 
were hoping in the fall that they were going to be able to take 
advantage of it, and they were very uncertain.
  It is a big program in Ohio. We actually have over 25,000 Ohio 
students who receive financial aid through Perkins. In one school 
alone, Kent State, 3,000 students.
  By the way, I got lobbied on this very directly. A young woman named 
Keri Richmond interned in my office last summer. Keri is a classic 
example of someone who needs Perkins because it fills in the gaps for 
her. In her case, she has a Pell. Yet as a young woman who has been in 
and out of foster homes her entire life--and, by the way, is a 
wonderful advocate and spokesperson for that program and how it helps 
foster kids to get on their feet--she does not have the help at home 
that many students do. So even for the small things, she needs that 
Perkins loan. She is very grateful today that we are extending this 
program, of course; but, more importantly, she is grateful for all her 
other colleagues at Kent State and around the State of Ohio.
  I was with some Ohio State students a couple weeks ago for a holiday 
party with the president of Ohio State, who is very pleased this has 
been finally handled because he was trying to plan. As we know, schools 
play a big role in Perkins. It is essentially like a revolving loan 
program. With the interest, they are able to come up with new loans for 
the next year. So the colleges and universities in Ohio are very 
involved. We have 1,700 students at Ohio State; overall, we have 60 
schools in the Buckeye State--colleges and universities--taking 
advantage of this. So this is a big deal for us.
  I appreciate the fact that the chairman has been willing to sit down 
and work with us on this and come up with a way for us to move forward 
to give these young people the certainty that they need at a time when 
it is more expensive to go to college. This is a barrier for a lot of 
young people to be able to get that degree, to get the experience, to 
have the ability to be able to go out in this tough job market and be 
able to find work and find their place in the workforce. I am happy we 
have come to this point.
  I will say I am very eager to work with the chairman, Ranking Member 
Murray, and others over the next period of time while we extend this 
program to come up with a better way to deal with our student loan 
program generally. I think the chairman makes a good point about the 
complexity. I think he is probably right that it is so complex that 
some parents and students are turned off by it, and we can simplify it. 
Certainly, we can, but I also want to make it clear that we need to be 
sure that we are providing maximum flexibility for students who might 
otherwise get left behind and wouldn't be able to take advantage of the 
opportunity to go to college and get a degree. We should be doing 
everything in our power to provide more students in my home State of 
Ohio and around the country the chance to get the tools they need in 
order to be able to be successful.
  I thank Senator Ayotte, Senator Casey, and Senator Baldwin. We have 
been at this for a while. We have been out here on the floor a few 
times talking about this. I think this is a result that lets us say to 
the people we represent back home: We are going to give you that 
certainty, that confidence to know this is not going to be pulled away.
  On the other hand, we are going to work hard over the next couple of 
years to ensure that this program is viable for the longer term--along 
with other programs--and simplify these programs so they do work better 
for all the parents and all the students whom we represent.
  I thank the chairman. This is one of the good results at the end of 
the year. In a way, going into the Christmas season, it is appropriate 
that we have this little package that is now wrapped up and has a 
ribbon on it. But it does expire, so our work is not done, and we will 
only redouble our efforts to ensure that we can come up with a program 
that does provide the flexibility and important safety net that Perkins 
does.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Ohio. He is 
exactly right. I know of no State that has more small colleges of the 
kind that would take advantage of Perkins loan probably than the State 
of Ohio. It is important to say that Senator Baldwin, Senator Casey, 
and Senator Ayotte have been urgently making their case on the floor 
over the last several weeks and have done so in such an effective way 
that we have been able to come up with a bipartisan compromise. The 
more of that we are able to do, I think the more confidence the 
American people will have in their Senators. So I appreciate his 
leadership in making this possible.
  Another Senator who is a member of the Senate's committee that 
oversees education is the Senator from Pennsylvania, Mr. Casey. He, 
too, has just

[[Page 20247]]

completed work on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which 
many people thought we had no chance of passing this year and which we 
passed by a very large margin. I thank him, as I did Senator Baldwin, 
for working in such a constructive way.
  Some people look at the Senate and say: Well, you all are always 
arguing. Of course we are. That is what we do. That is like looking at 
the Grand Ole Opry and saying: You all are always singing. We have 
different points of view--and we do on the Perkins loan. But once we 
make our points of view known, we then do our jobs and we say: OK. Now 
we need to get a result. If all we wanted to do was to make a speech or 
make a point, we could stay home or get our own radio show. But we are 
Senators, and our job, having had our say, is to get a result.
  So I thank Senator Casey, the Senator from Pennsylvania not only for 
his work on this compromise on Perkins loans but also for his work on 
our efforts to fix No Child Left Behind. I look forward to his 
comments.
  Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, I thank the chairman for his work in 
helping us get to this point today. It is an important moment at the 
end of an important year, and we are grateful for his leadership. Even 
when we have had a basic disagreement to get this compromise worked 
out, it would not have happened, it could not have happened without his 
leadership and working with Democrats on our side of the aisle, Senator 
Murray, as the ranking member of the Health, Education, Labor, and 
Pensions Committee, working with Chairman Alexander. I thank Senator 
Baldwin for her work in leading this effort on our side and leading our 
team.
  This is a compromise, which, as Senator Alexander noted, some people 
don't think we do enough of. I think it is an important example of why 
we must work together.
  When we consider the compromise that I worked on and the other 
Senators who are here and others who are not here, along with our 
staffs--I mentioned Jared and Lauren on my staff, who did a lot of work 
on this, and we are grateful for that.
  But we can report today some good news for more than 150,000 current 
freshmen Perkins loan recipients whose eligibility was cut off when the 
program expired on the 30th of September of this year. This bipartisan 
agreement provides for a 2-year extension of the Perkins Loan Program 
and provides some certainty for students and their families as we 
debate a longer term solution. We have more to do. Simply put, what 
students tell us they need is that basic certainty.
  One of the reasons we are happy we have reached a compromise at this 
stage is that I think most of us believe what have I often said--that 
early education applies to higher education. If young people learn more 
when they are in their college years, they are going to earn more 
later. One of the ways to learn more when you are at that age is to 
have the resources and help of a loan program such as Perkins.
  Perkins loans are critically important in a State such as 
Pennsylvania. Forty thousand students in Pennsylvania receive these 
loans at more than 100 schools. As many people know, these loans are 
fixed rate and they are low interest. Unlike traditional subsidized 
loans, they don't accrue interest when the student is in school. They 
have significant robust forgiveness opportunities for borrowers who, 
for example, become high school teachers or first responders or 
librarians or nurses or Peace Corps volunteers, among so many other 
professions. The loans can be consolidated to qualify for income-based 
repayment and other loan-forgiveness options.
  This agreement ensures that those with the least financial resources 
will be able to continue to receive this important source of financial 
aid. Because of this compromise, freshmen and students across the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will not have to choose between dropping 
out and taking out unaffordable, high-interest private loans in order 
to secure their degree.
  I would like to give two examples before I conclude.
  Abigail Anderson, a freshman at Immaculata University, currently 
receives a Perkins loan of $2,000. She said she had it all figured out, 
but with this program expiring on September 30, she said: It changes 
everything. She said she didn't know how she was going to pay for 
school next year because her parents couldn't afford to pay any more. 
About the Perkins Loans, Abigail Anderson said, ``Every little amount 
counts. It makes a difference.''
  Here is another example. Amber Gunn, a freshman at Temple University, 
is from Hazelton, PA, near my hometown of Scranton. Amber did not have 
enough money to pay her tuition bill even for this year. Her mother 
wasn't able to cosign her loans, but she was able to get a Perkins loan 
in the amount of $5,000 from the help of Temple University's financial 
aid office. Amber Gunn said as follows:

       Without the Perkins Loan I probably wouldn't have been able 
     to enroll for my first semester of school. I'm not sure what 
     I'll do next year without the loan, I'm kind of in a 
     predicament.

  For some, that might be an understatement.
  So now, with this bipartisan agreement, neither Abigail nor Amber and 
so many others will have to worry. They can focus their attention on 
the end of the semester, their exams--and whatever else they are having 
to focus on--instead of wondering whether they will be able to afford 
to return to campus for their sophomore years.
  Even with this compromise, we have lots of work to do--more work to 
do to come together on reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. But 
this is a good moment for the Senate, and it is especially a good 
moment for students and families across the country, and in my case for 
the some 40,000 in the State of Pennsylvania.
  I thank the chairman for his leadership and again thank Senator 
Baldwin.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Tennessee.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I once again thank the Senator from 
Pennsylvania for being both a passionate advocate and skilled 
legislator in helping us come to a result here that meets most of the 
goals of the Senators who spoke about this, at least for the next 2 
years, and gives us a chance in our committee to continue to work on 
it.


                          BUDGETARY REVISIONS

  Mr. ENZI. Mr. President, section 4313 of S. Con. Res. 11, the 
Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2016, allows the 
chairman of the Senate Budget Committee to revise the allocations, 
aggregates and levels in the budget resolution for legislation that 
would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. The authority to adjust 
is contingent on the legislation not increasing the deficit over either 
the period of the total of fiscal years 2016-2020 or the period of the 
total of fiscal years 2016-2025.
  I find that amendment No. 2929 fulfills the conditions of deficit 
neutrality found in section 4313 of S. Con. Res. 11. Accordingly, I am 
revising the allocation to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 
and Pensions and the budgetary aggregates to account for the budget 
effects of the legislation.
  I ask unanimous consent that the accompanying tables, which provide 
details about the adjustment, be printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

             BUDGET AGGREGATES--BUDGET AUTHORITY AND OUTLAYS
  (Pursuant to Section 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and
Section 4313 of S. Con. Res. 11, the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget
                          for Fiscal Year 2016)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 $s in millions                            2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Aggregates:
    Budget Authority...........................                3,009,288
    Outlays....................................                3,067,674
Adjustments:
    Budget Authority...........................                      269
    Outlays....................................                      269
Revised Aggregates:
    Budget Authority...........................                3,009,557
    Outlays....................................                3,067,943
------------------------------------------------------------------------


              REVISION TO THE ALLOCATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR AND PENSIONS
    (Pursuant to Section 302 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and Section 4313 of S. Con. Res. 11, the
                            Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2016)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         $s in millions                                2016          2016-2020       2016-2025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Allocation:
    Budget Authority............................................          12,137          83,101         160,672

[[Page 20248]]

 
    Outlays.....................................................          14,271          85,383         171,731
Adjustments:
    Budget Authority............................................             269             -14             -13
    Outlays.....................................................             269             -14             -13
Revised Allocation:
    Budget Authority............................................          12,406          83,087         160,659
    Outlays.....................................................          14,540          85,369         171,718
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
now proceed to the consideration of H.R. 3594, which was received from 
the House.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
  The bill clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 3594) to extend temporarily the Federal 
     Perkins Loan program, and for other purposes.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. I ask unanimous consent that the Alexander substitute 
amendment, which is at the desk, be agreed to, and that the bill, as 
amended, be read a third time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The amendment (No. 2929) in the nature of a substitute was agreed to, 
as follows:

                (Purpose: In the nature of a substitute)

       Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
     following:

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Perkins Loan Program 
     Extension Act of 2015''.

     SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAM.

       (a) Authority to Make Loans.--
       (1) In general.--Section 461 of the Higher Education Act of 
     1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087aa) is amended--
       (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``of stimulating and 
     assisting in the establishment and maintenance of funds at 
     institutions of higher education for the making of low-
     interest loans to students in need thereof'' and inserting 
     ``assisting in the maintenance of funds at institutions of 
     higher education for the making of loans to undergraduate 
     students in need'';
       (B) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
       ``(b) Authority to Make Loans.--
       ``(1) In general.--
       ``(A) Loans for new undergraduate federal perkins loan 
     borrowers.--Through September 30, 2017, an institution of 
     higher education may make a loan under this part to an 
     eligible undergraduate student who, on the date of 
     disbursement of a loan made under this part, has no 
     outstanding balance of principal or interest on a loan made 
     under this part from the student loan fund established under 
     this part by the institution, but only if the institution has 
     awarded all Federal Direct Loans, as referenced under 
     subparagraphs (A) and (D) of section 455(a)(2), for which 
     such undergraduate student is eligible.
       ``(B) Loans for current undergraduate federal perkins loan 
     borrowers.--Through September 30, 2017, an institution of 
     higher education may make a loan under this part to an 
     eligible undergraduate student who, on the date of 
     disbursement of a loan made under this part, has an 
     outstanding balance of principal or interest on a loan made 
     under this part from the student loan fund established under 
     this part by the institution, but only if the institution has 
     awarded all Federal Direct Stafford Loans as referenced under 
     section 455(a)(2)(A) for which such undergraduate student is 
     eligible.
       ``(C) Loans for certain graduate borrowers.--Through 
     September 30, 2016, with respect to an eligible graduate 
     student who has received a loan made under this part prior to 
     October 1, 2015, an institution of higher education that has 
     most recently made such a loan to the student for an academic 
     program at such institution may continue making loans under 
     this part from the student loan fund established under this 
     part by the institution to enable the student to continue or 
     complete such academic program.
       ``(2) No additional loans.--An institution of higher 
     education shall not make loans under this part after 
     September 30, 2017.
       ``(3) Prohibition on additional appropriations.--No funds 
     are authorized to be appropriated under this Act or any other 
     Act to carry out the functions described in paragraph (1) for 
     any fiscal year following fiscal year 2015.''; and
       (C) by striking subsection (c).
       (2) Rule of construction.--Notwithstanding the amendments 
     made under paragraph (1) of this subsection, an eligible 
     graduate borrower who received a disbursement of a loan under 
     part E of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
     U.S.C. 1087aa et seq.) after June 30, 2016 and before October 
     1, 2016, for the 2016-2017 award year, may receive a 
     subsequent disbursement of such loan by June 30, 2017, for 
     which the borrower received an initial disbursement after 
     June 30, 2016 and before October 1, 2016.
       (b) Distribution of Assets From Student Loan Funds.--
     Section 466 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
     1087ff) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
     ``After September 30, 2003, and not later than March 31, 
     2004'' and inserting ``Beginning October 1, 2017''; and
       (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``September 30, 2003'' 
     and inserting ``September 30, 2017'';
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) by striking ``After October 1, 2012'' and inserting 
     ``Beginning October 1, 2017''; and
       (B) by striking ``September 30, 2003'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2017''; and
       (3) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``October 1, 2004'' 
     and inserting ``October 1, 2017''.
       (c) Additional Extensions Not Permitted.--Section 422 of 
     the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1226a) shall 
     not apply to further extend the duration of the authority 
     under paragraph (1) of section 461(b) of the Higher Education 
     Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087aa(b)), as amended by subsection 
     (a)(1) of this section, beyond September 30, 2017, on the 
     basis of the extension under such subsection.

     SEC. 3. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISBURSEMENT.

       Section 463A(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
     U.S.C. 1087cc-1(a)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (12), by striking ``and'' after the 
     semicolon;
       (2) in paragraph (13), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(14) a notice and explanation regarding the end to future 
     availability of loans made under this part;
       ``(15) a notice and explanation that repayment and 
     forgiveness benefits available to borrowers of loans made 
     under part D are not available to borrowers participating in 
     the loan program under this part;
       ``(16) a notice and explanation regarding a borrower's 
     option to consolidate a loan made under this part into a 
     Federal Direct Loan under part D, including any benefit of 
     such consolidation;
       ``(17) with respect to new undergraduate Federal Perkins 
     loan borrowers, as described in section 461(b)(1)(A), a 
     notice and explanation providing a comparison of the interest 
     rates of loans under this part and part D and informing the 
     borrower that the borrower has reached the maximum annual 
     borrowing limit for which the borrower is eligible as 
     referenced under subparagraphs (A) and (D) of section 
     455(a)(2); and
       ``(18) with respect to current undergraduate Federal 
     Perkins loan borrowers, as described in section 461(b)(1)(B), 
     a notice and explanation providing a comparison of the 
     interest rates of loans under this part and part D and 
     informing the borrower that the borrower has reached the 
     maximum annual borrowing limit for which the borrower is 
     eligible on Federal Direct Stafford Loans as referenced under 
     section 455(a)(2)(A).''.

  The bill was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading and was read 
the third time.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I know of no further debate on this 
measure.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Hearing no further debate, the bill having 
been read the third time, the question is, Shall it pass?
  The bill (H.R. 3594), as amended, was passed.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. I ask unanimous consent that the motion to reconsider 
be considered made and laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. ALEXANDER. Once again, I thank Senator Baldwin, Senator Casey, 
and the other Senators who participated in our colloquy, Senator Ayotte 
and Senator Portman. They have all pushed hard to see that we get a 
result on the Perkins loan extension. They have been effective 
advocates and skilled legislators, and I am grateful for their hard 
work.
  There have been other Senators who have spoken on the floor and have 
been very passionate advocates. I don't think I have a list of all of 
them, but I know, for example, Senator Collins made her case here on 
the floor and in the conference on our elementary and secondary 
education bill for the students of Maine who receive Perkins Loans. I 
know Senator Blumenthal was here on a day when I was here as well 
making his case for students in Connecticut. I know the Senator from 
Wisconsin, Mr. Johnson, was here making a vigorous case for the 
students from Wisconsin, as did Senator Baldwin. Senator Boozman of 
Arkansas and Senator Cochran of Mississippi have

[[Page 20249]]

also been advocates as well as those who participated in the colloquy.
  We have had a broad group of Senators involved both on the floor and 
in the negotiations. We now have passed a bill in the Senate. It will 
go to the House. Hopefully, it will be considered and become a law by 
the end of the year.
  I look forward to working with my two colleagues on the education 
committee to reauthorize the Higher Education Act, with the goal of 
simplifying and making more effective the Federal Student Aid Program 
so American students can afford and can attend college or university.
  Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. HOEVEN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Tillis). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________