[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 14]
[Senate]
[Pages 20004-20006]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                         SENATE ACCOMPLISHMENTS

  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, it is December 10, and Congress is working 
its way through some final items of business, including a giant 
spending bill called an omnibus--some might call it an ``ominous''--
bill because it is so big it takes all of the discretionary spending 
that Congress makes for the entire year and wraps it up into one big 
package. I have to say it did not have to be that way. It shouldn't 
have been that way.
  In the 114th Congress, under new leadership, we actually did 
something that hadn't been done in 6 years. We actually passed a 
budget. The purpose of the budget in part is to set caps on spending 
levels for the Appropriations Committee and for the 12 appropriations 
bills that should come out--and in fact did come out--of the 
Appropriations Committee. But the reason we find ourselves here at the 
end of the year with this ominous Omnibus appropriations process is 
that our Democratic colleagues filibustered all of those individual 
appropriations bills.
  It would have been so much better to take those up one at a time so 
the American people and Members of the Senate could read them and 
understand them. We could debate them, we could offer amendments to try 
to improve them, and then we could finally pass them and send them on 
to the President. But because of the desire to force the majority to 
agree to higher spending levels, our colleagues across the aisle 
filibustered those appropriations bills. So here we are, at the end of 
the year, with a few huge pieces of legislation left to consider.
  I think most people looking at Washington, DC, these days are tempted 
to want to look the other way because so much that happens here seems 
to be so contentious and, frankly, a reflection of our polarized 
politics in America. But despite all of the challenges we have--and I 
know the Democratic leader the other day actually claimed this was one 
of the most unproductive Senates in recent memory, only to be given 
three Pinocchios by the Fact Checker at The Washington Post. So I would 
like to remind the Democratic leader about some of the things we have 
actually done, working in a bipartisan fashion, to get legislation 
through the Senate, through the House, and to the President's desk.
  Sometimes I think we need a bit of a refresher course on what the 
Constitution provides in terms of the division of responsibilities in 
government. The Founders of our great Nation made it hard--not easy. 
They made it hard to pass laws, and appropriately so, because they 
viewed the concentration of power and the ability to push through 
legislation as a potential threat to their individual liberties. So not 
only did they divide the legislative power between the House and the 
Senate, but they also created a Presidency that has the ability to veto 
that legislation.
  Sometimes in their enthusiasm for certain policies, some of our own 
constituents get frustrated and they say: Why couldn't you pass this 
bill or that bill? Well, the truth is the only way this happens is when 
there is, first of all, some leadership on the part of the majority 
party because it is the majority leader and the Speaker, the majority 
leader in the House, who actually set the agenda. So that is pretty 
important. A lot of the legislation we considered this year would not 
have even come up if our Democratic friends had been in charge. But 
once we have the bill on the floor, it literally takes bipartisan 
consensus building in order to actually get something done.
  I would like to talk about a few of those things that we have been 
able to get done this year because I don't want them to get lost amidst 
all of the contentiousness that people read about and watch on their 
television. It is important that the people we work for understand we 
have actually been trying very hard to get some important things done.
  After the House of Representatives passed the Every Student Succeeds 
Act with a strong bipartisan vote last week, yesterday the Senate 
followed suit by passing that legislation with 85 votes. It obviously 
wasn't perfect because 15 of our colleagues did not vote for it, but 
that was about as strong a bipartisan vote as you get in the Senate 
these days.
  I think it is important to highlight the time and effort it took many 
Members of this body to create and ultimately pass this bill. Of 
course, it took the leadership of Chairman Alexander of the Health, 
Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. But the fact is--and I know 
he would say this if he were standing here on the floor--he could not 
have done it if it weren't for the partnership of the senior Senator 
from Washington, Mrs. Murray, a member of the other political party. 
What they showed us is how working together in a bipartisan way can 
achieve real reform and positive change for the American people. That 
is the way the process is supposed to work.
  Sometimes, though, policies are so bad that the best response is 
simply to stop it. I don't think we should diminish or deprecate the 
merits of stopping bad legislation, but where there is an area of 
common interest, where consensus can be built on what the appropriate 
legislative response is, that is how it is done--the way Senator 
Alexander and Senator Murray did.

[[Page 20005]]

  Of course, we are in a political environment where people like to 
focus on the partisan bickering and gridlock. But passage of this bill 
serves as just one example of a Senate that has been back to work under 
new leadership since the last election about a year ago, and we 
appreciate the willingness of our friends on the other side of the 
aisle to work with us on a number of areas to try to make those 
accomplishments a reality.
  Another example is in the area of transportation funding. Last week, 
for the first time in more than a decade, Congress passed a multiyear 
transportation bill. I think it was more than 30 different times before 
that Congress had passed short-term patches to those spending bills for 
transportation, and you can imagine how difficult it was for States to 
actually plan and then to implement some of their construction projects 
to improve their transportation infrastructure. In that case, it was 
the hard work of the senior Senator from Oklahoma, Mr. Inhofe, who 
chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, as well as the 
junior Senator from California, Mrs. Boxer, working together as a team; 
then, of course, Senator Hatch, chairman of the Senate Finance 
Committee, and Senator Wyden, the ranking member, a Democrat, working 
together to try to come up with some of the funding mechanisms. But as 
the majority leader said last week, it would not have been possible to 
pass this multiyear highway bill for the first time in a decade if it 
weren't for the bipartisan cooperation we saw and, particularly on the 
Democratic side, the leadership of Senator Boxer.
  Now, with this legislation, States like mine, Texas--growing States 
can plan and build projects that strengthen our Nation's infrastructure 
and make our transportation system safer. They can avoid some of that 
churning, uncertainty, and inefficiency that comes from temporary 
patches. President Obama signed that legislation last week, and now it 
is the law of the land.
  Like the education bill I mentioned a moment ago, the transportation 
funding bill, which was called the Fixing America's Surface 
Transportation, or FAST, Act, passed this Chamber with more than 80 
votes--80 votes. With 54 Republicans and 46 affiliated with the 
Democrats, the minority, the Transportation bill got 80 votes. 
Obviously this was a strong bipartisan vote and a testament to the 
bipartisan spirit this year in a Senate that has allowed us to make 
some progress on long neglected and long overdue goals like 
transportation funding.
  Then I think about other topics we have worked together on, such as 
trade. When the President said he wanted us to pass the Trade Promotion 
Authority legislation, only 13 Democrats voted for it. So it was up to 
the majority--the Republicans, the other party--to provide the votes to 
pass Trade Promotion Authority.
  Not everybody thought it was a good idea, sure. But in my State, one 
reason our economy continues to do better than most of the rest of the 
country is that we are the No. 1 exporting State in the Nation. We 
believe it is good for our economy and for job creation to be able to 
sell things that we make, agricultural goods we grow, and livestock we 
raise to markets around the world. That is what Trade Promotion 
Authority will allow. It will help Texas farmers, ranchers, and 
manufacturers get the best deal possible out of pending trade 
agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is focused on 
40 percent of the world's gross domestic product in Asia. It is very 
important that we stay engaged in Asia because the default is for China 
to fill that void and set the rules.
  The Trade Promotion Authority, which was an important priority for 
the President, happened to be something that Republicans by and large 
agreed with and his own party disagreed with. As I said, only 13 
Democrats voted for it.
  The trade promotion authority legislation is really the first step to 
opening up the doors of opportunity to our country's businesses 
worldwide, but particularly in Asia. Like the other bills I mentioned, 
trade promotion authority was the result of the tireless effort of a 
bipartisan partnership. In this case, the senior Senator from Utah, Mr. 
Hatch, chairman of the Finance Committee, and the ranking member of the 
Finance Committee, Ron Wyden, the Senator from Oregon, spent countless 
hours negotiating and renegotiating the legislation to bring it to the 
floor and ultimately to be signed into law by the President.
  Another example happened to be the way we pay physicians under the 
Medicare program that our seniors rely upon. Year after year, we would 
come up with short-term patches to the so-called doc fix. But this year 
we passed a permanent fix in a negotiation between Speaker Boehner and 
the Democratic leader in the House, Congresswoman Pelosi, that actually 
preserves seniors' access to care under the Medicare program--a 
noteworthy accomplishment.
  Another subject I am particularly proud of is that we passed the 
Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act, a bill this Chamber passed with 
99 votes. This law will help victims of modern-day slavery recover and 
rebuild their lives and will make sure these survivors--some of whom 
are children--are not treated like criminals but given the help they 
need to heal and to get on with their lives.
  We have also passed critical bills to protect our country from cyber 
attacks--something we saw happen at the IRS, where 100,000 records of 
taxpayers was hacked in a cyber attack and stolen and compromised. We 
also saw millions of people's records compromised at the Office of 
Management and Budget.
  Congress has passed legislation, which is now being reconciled with a 
different House bill to be able to get that to the President, to 
provide that security that we all need when we are online. And as I 
said, we passed the first budget that has been passed in 6 years. The 
point I am trying to convey is that not everything up here is fighting 
like cats and dogs. It is not the shirts versus the skins. It is not 
like the Democrats and Republicans can never find anything that we 
agree on. Sure, there is there is a lot that we disagree on, and that 
is fine. It is fine to have policy differences. This is the forum where 
those policy differences are debated and where, if possible, if common 
ground can be found, we can find that common ground.
  I have told this story, and I am going to conclude here since I see 
our colleague from Georgia waiting to speak. When I came to the Senate, 
Ted Kennedy, from Massachusetts, the ``liberal lion of the Senate,'' 
who had been here for so long, was working with one of the most 
conservative Members of the Senate, the Senator from Wyoming, on the 
HELP Committee--the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. I 
asked Mr. Enzi, the Senator from Wyoming: How is it that you and 
Senator Kennedy, who are polar opposites, can find common ground and 
actually work productively on the HELP Committee? I have never 
forgotten it. Senator Enzi told me: It is simple; it is the 80-20 rule. 
We look for the 80 percent, if possible, that we can find common ground 
and agree on, and the 20 percent we can't agree on, we leave for 
another fight another day.
  That always stuck with me as a very constructive way to work in a 
highly polarized environment where many of us share completely 
different views about public policy. But we owe it to our constituents, 
to this institution, and to the American people to try to find common 
ground where we can and offer them constructive solutions, as we have 
done time and again this Congress.
  While there are some who want to distract or misconstrue or deny the 
fact, the fact is there has been bipartisan accomplishment this year. 
But it takes leadership, and it appeared to take a new majority and a 
new majority leader after this last election to get the Senate back on 
track.
  Even many of our Democratic friends who served in the majority 
previously couldn't even get votes on amendments, on legislation they 
wanted to offer, because the Senate was basically shut down. But now we 
are back to work, and the Senate is functioning the way it should.

[[Page 20006]]

  I wanted to say a few words to note these accomplishments but also to 
say thank you to those who have worked together to make it possible, 
who put the American people ahead of party to deliver real results in 
the Senate this year.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Georgia.

                          ____________________