[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 161 (2015), Part 14]
[House]
[Pages 19429-19430]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                      JUST ANOTHER DAY IN AMERICA

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 6, 2015, the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Larson) is 
recognized for the remainder of the hour as the designee of the 
minority leader.
  Mr. LARSON of Connecticut. Mr. Speaker, may I inquire how much time I 
have.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman has 25 minutes remaining.
  Mr. LARSON of Connecticut. Mr. Speaker, today, like so many 
Americans, we are in utter disbelief that our country is once again 
left reeling after yet another horrific massacre of innocent Americans. 
There is grave concern that this has become the norm.
  In fact, this is how the BBC characterized the shootings in 
California yesterday:

       Just another day in the United States of America--another 
     day of gunfire, panic, and fear. This time in California.

  But it could have been, as it was last week, in Colorado, or in 
Arizona, or Oregon, or South Carolina, or Nevada, or Wisconsin, or 
D.C., or in Georgia, where it also transpired.
  In the capital city of Connecticut, in Hartford alone, there have 
been 28 deaths this year as a result of gun violence.
  In 11 days, we will be passing and observing the third anniversary of 
the mass murder of schoolchildren and their teachers at Sandy Hook 
Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
  In the 3 years since that tragic day in 2012, when many thought, 
``Well now, finally now, this innocence, this slaughter of innocent 
children, surely there will be change. Surely the United States 
Congress will take a vote. Surely Congress will respond. They will take 
a vote. They will take action,'' but as we did then, we will do next 
week. We will stand in silence, a respectful and heartfelt silence, for 
victims of what happened in California and Georgia just yesterday. It 
is something this Congress repeats in such a way that the BBC 
characterizes it as just another day in America.
  In the 3 years since that tragic day
in December, in fact, there have been
an additional--additional--1,000 mass shootings in the United States of 
America. One thousand mass shootings

[[Page 19430]]

in the United States of America--that averages almost a mass shooting 
per day--and yet not a single vote, not a vote. Irrespective of where 
you stand on the issue, in the great Chamber where the country looks to 
for leadership, not a single vote.
  Mr. Speaker, I want to put up this chart that I think graphically 
displays what has been going on in this country to illustrate a point--
a sad point, no matter how you view this chart.
  Between 2001 and 2013, guns killed more people in the United States 
of America than AIDS, illegal drug overdoses, wars, and terrorism 
combined. Gun violence has taken more individuals than all these other 
tragedies and calamities combined.
  Far more Americans have faced and, as the families of victims, they 
hear the remorse, they hear the platitudes, they observe the moments of 
silence and the laying of wreaths, but there is no action that comes 
from the United States Congress. These statistics should stagger anyone 
who reads them and compel Congress to take action, any action, to 
address this epidemic of gun violence.
  Now, I say ``any action.'' Whether you believe, as I do, that we 
should have commonsense, universal background checks so that we keep 
guns out of the hands of criminals, the mentally ill, and terrorists on 
a watch list, this is common sense. This is what I believe the Nation 
should be doing, and I believe, frankly, so do a majority of people in 
this Chamber and throughout this country, but we have yet to take a 
vote. We have yet, though there are bills on the floor, though they are 
bipartisan. At least the Senate, in a bill sponsored by Senator Joe 
Manchin, Senator Pat Toomey, put forward a reasonable proposition.
  Whether you believe that it is a panacea or not or that it will 
somehow help, or maybe not, aren't the citizens of this country, aren't 
the families of the victims entitled to a vote? What do we owe our 
constituents if not a vote?
  If the United States Congress continues to remain silent, as it has, 
I submit, we are complicit in these deaths every time we remain silent 
and every time we take no action.
  It doesn't take a lot of courage, frankly, to vote. We are protected 
in this building by police. We are surrounded by armed guards. There is 
nothing that threatens any Member of Congress from doing his 
constitutional responsibility to vote.
  What takes courage is what Officer Garrett Swasey did just last week, 
giving his life in the line of duty, defending and protecting people 
under siege.

                              {time}  1445

  Mr. Speaker, do you want to talk about terrorist threats? There is 
real terrorism happening in America every day: more than 1,000 mass 
shootings since Sandy Hook, deaths on our streets due to gun violence.
  We could rush in a matter of days to this floor when an outrage 
occurred in Paris, rush to this floor in days with legislation to deal 
with refugees, and yet, in our own country, in our own cities across 
this Nation and throughout our States, can we not have a vote in 
Congress?
  I recognize and respect the fact that people will disagree and 
perhaps think that background checks are not necessary or won't solve 
the problem. Maybe that is true. I don't believe so. But aren't we 
entitled to a vote? Aren't those victims of those families entitled to 
a vote? Do their voices mean anything?
  If the vote fails, the body will have spoken, and if the vote 
succeeds, this body will have spoken also and will have an opportunity 
to see its results and observe it.
  Mr. Speaker, that is how this great body works. To be denied the 
opportunity to vote only, in my mind, makes us further complicit to the 
tragedies that are happening all across this country.
  Another day in America, another day of gunfire, panic, and fear. How 
about a day where Congress actually votes, where Members actually stand 
up and are accountable for what they say they believe in so no matter 
how you feel on this issue--and I truly respect people who disagree 
with me.
  But I would like to have the opportunity to vote the conscience of my 
constituency and the beliefs that I deeply hold. It would seem to me 
that, in this day and age, in this body, we ought to be able to do 
that.
  I recognize that there are probably not many people listening to my 
remarks right now, and I realize that Americans are incredibly 
frustrated with the United States Congress in general because of its 
inaction on so many levels.
  But I urge anyone who is listening across America, whether you are 
opposed to universal background checks or you are in favor of them, to 
call their Representatives and demand of them before they go home to 
enjoy the Christmas holidays, before we adjourn, that we take a vote on 
this issue. Demand that we show you where we stand on commonsense 
background checks.
  If you really believe in your position, what is there to hide from? 
We need to take a vote. Americans need to know where we stand. This 
isn't a profile in courage; this is our responsibility.
  This issue has been looked at, it has been studied, and it has 
supporters on both sides. There is a discharge petition on the floor, 
but, frankly, this bill ought to be brought to the floor and voted on.
  It should be voted on in the Senate Chamber. It is my understanding 
that Harry Reid will include it as an amendment. The Senate then will 
have voted twice, and the House remains silent. We need to vote.
  In this body, in this great Chamber, I would much rather be known by 
the votes I have taken than the speeches I have made, the press 
releases that have gone out, and the 30-second sound bites that will 
follow. I would like to be known, as I believe all Members of this body 
would, for the votes I have taken standing up on behalf of my 
constituents.
  Above the podium of the Speaker, there is a famous quote from Daniel 
Webster, and I paraphrase that quote. Webster asked aloud of all 
Members of this body whether, in our day and generation, we will 
perform something for which we will be remembered. I ask this body for 
a vote for which we will be remembered.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to address their 
remarks to the Chair and not to a perceived viewing audience.

                          ____________________