[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 160 (2014), Part 6]
[House]
[Pages 8583-8736]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




HOWARD P. ``BUCK'' McKEON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL 
                               YEAR 2015


                             General Leave

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may 
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and 
insert extraneous material on H.R. 4435.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Forbes). Is there objection to the 
request of the gentleman from California?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 585 and rule 
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House 
on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill, H.R. 4435.
  The Chair appoints the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Stewart) to preside 
over the Committee of the Whole.

                              {time}  1924


                     In the Committee of the Whole

  Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 4435) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for 
military activities of the Department of Defense and for military 
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal 
year, and for other purposes, with Mr. Stewart in the chair.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The CHAIR. Pursuant to the rule, the bill is considered read the 
first time.
  The gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from 
Washington (Mr. Smith) each will control 30 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
  First, let me express my appreciation to Ranking Member Smith for his 
leadership and friendship. He has been an invaluable partner in 
upholding our committee's focus on providing for our men and women in 
uniform. I would also like to thank our colleagues on the Armed 
Services Committee for their professionalism and their hard work.
  I am incredibly proud of the bipartisan, transparent, and inclusive 
process our committee undertakes each year. The bill under 
consideration today is a strong reflection of the bipartisan priorities 
and concerns shared by members of the committee, and is the result of 
diligent oversight that has been conducted throughout the year. It 
contains 154 amendments that were adopted during markup, and it passed 
out of committee with unanimous support.
  The bill would authorize $521 billion for national defense and an 
additional $79 billion for overseas contingency operations, consistent 
with the 2013 bipartisan budget agreement and the House-passed budget.
  While we do not yet have the details of the OCO request, our 
committee, the House Budget Committee, and the administration, all 
agree that these funds will be required to support a residual U.S. 
presence in Afghanistan; other ongoing operations, including in Africa; 
and the reset and retrograde of equipment for the active, Guard, and 
Reserve forces.
  The bill contains no earmarks. It provides vital national security 
resources for our troops while also maintaining our stewardship over 
the taxpayer dollar.
  The bill provides our warfighters, veterans, and their families with 
the care and support that they need, deserve, and have earned. It 
continues to advance the substantial reforms introduced in last year's 
NDAA aimed at preventing sexual assault in the military, and it takes 
several steps aimed at improving the military's suicide prevention 
programs. The bill would increase troop pay while rejecting cuts to 
TRICARE, housing allowances, and commissary benefits that would 
increase out-of-pocket expenses for military families.
  The legislation would provide our warfighters with the resources and 
authorities they need to support an enduring mission in Afghanistan and 
to continue pressuring al Qaeda and its affiliates. It also maintains 
strong accountability and monitoring mechanisms for U.S. funds, ensures 
the development of sound plans tied to resources, and continues the 
prohibitions on the transfer of detainees to the United States.
  I recently visited Afghanistan and was encouraged by the progress of 
coalition forces and developments within the Afghan society. Nearly 8 
million kids are in school, and a large percentage of those are girls, 
compared to the 700,000 that were attending school

[[Page 8584]]

under Taliban rule. We need the President to signal his commitment and 
remove the uncertainty that persists among the Afghan people and our 
coalition partners, which al Qaeda and the Taliban continue to exploit. 
Afghanistan cannot return to being a safe haven for al Qaeda.
  In this era of declining resources, the committee was faced with 
difficult choices as we sought to preserve key capabilities and to 
ensure our Armed Forces could meet current threats and prepare for 
future challenges. The bill identifies savings in less critical areas 
that do not permanently damage the force or harm recruiting and 
retention.
  The legislation guards against achieving false short-term savings at 
the expense of vital long-term strategic capabilities.

                              {time}  1930

  For example, it supports the refueling of the USS George Washington--
an aircraft carrier with 25 years of service life remaining--and it 
prohibits the early retirement of Navy cruisers, dock landing ships, 
and the Air Force U-2 spy planes.
  These capabilities are vital to our commanders in the Pacific, as 
well as elsewhere across the globe. It also addresses shortfalls in 
readiness by resourcing several unmet requirements in equipment, 
training, and depot maintenance and by fully funding flying hour 
programs across the services.
  We must also get more defense for the dollar, which is why the 
committee has initiated a comprehensive defense reform effort. This 
bill begins that process with a series of provisions on institutional, 
acquisition, security, and strategy reforms.
  However, we must recognize that cost savings and reforms alone do not 
compensate for the significant cuts to defense in recent years. The 
Department of Defense has seen over $1 trillion cut from its budget. 
This year's budget request is over $30 billion less than last year's.
  The padding has been cut, and the Department is now cutting into the 
bone--cutting end strength, force structure, and readiness--which is 
increasing risk to our forces and their core missions. While this bill 
makes tough choices, Congress will be called upon to make impossible 
choices in the years ahead if sequestration is not addressed.
  For 52 straight years, the National Defense Authorization Act has 
been passed and signed into law. Congress has no higher responsibility 
than to provide for the common defense, and with that in mind, I look 
forward to passing this bill for the 53rd consecutive year, my last 
year as chairman and as a Member of Congress.
  Serving as chairman has been the great honor of my career. I am 
humbled by the many soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines whom I have 
met over the years and by the sacrifices that they and their families 
make to keep America safe. I am thankful for my colleagues on both 
sides of the aisle, and I am very appreciative of our staff.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I 
may consume.
  First of all, I want to join the chairman in thanking him for the 
working relationship that he and I have enjoyed now through 4 years and 
four national defense authorization acts. It is one of the main 
principles of our committee in that it is bipartisan, that we work 
together, and we produce a product every year--52 straight years, the 
National Defense Authorization Act.
  That doesn't happen as a starting point, unless the chair of the 
committee takes the responsibility very seriously to make sure that our 
committee remains bipartisan. We have had a whole series of chairmen 
during my tenure who have done that, and Mr. McKeon has followed that 
tradition just as well as his predecessors. He has worked very closely 
with us.
  We do not always agree, but we work closely together, understanding 
that, at the end of the day, we have to produce a bill. So I thank him 
for that, and I recognize that this will be his last NDAA. In fact, 
this is the Buck McKeon National Defense Authorization Act. Mr. 
Thornberry and I were proud to cosponsor the amendment in committee to 
name this after Buck, for his great service to our committee.
  As always, I also want to thank the staff. I can't thank them enough 
for the work that they do and for the hours that they put in. They 
spent yesterday going through 320 amendments.
  Their expertise that they bring to this process is invaluable, and 
someday, I hope that the House Administration Committee recognizes that 
and actually gives us the amount of money we need to keep them. That is 
just a little sidenote on a different piece of legislation.
  This is, by and large, a good bill with one significant problem, 
which I will get to in a minute.
  First of all, as the chairman notes, we are still at war in 
Afghanistan. I would say that I think, at this point, our continuing 
commitment to Afghanistan is up to the Afghan people and, most 
importantly, is up to the next Afghan President. We need the bilateral 
security agreement to be signed. It has been agreed to.
  President Karzai has refused to sign it, but hopefully, the next 
President will. We have troops in harm's way, and this bill prioritizes 
protecting them. Nothing is more important than what we do here today.
  I am also pleased that this bill prioritizes Special Operations 
Command and cyber warfare, recognizing, as we heard in the previous 
piece of legislation about Boko Haram, that the main threat that we 
face going forward is from terrorism and asymmetric threats.
  I think we reflect that in this bill by funding those portions in the 
Defense Department that deal with those issues, and I think that is 
incredibly important.
  However, we do have a budget problem, and put simply, we have a lot 
less money now than we thought we were going to have. So that means 
that 3 years ago, when the Pentagon was planning what they were going 
to spend over the course of a decade, they had a much larger number 
than they have now.
  There are a whole bunch of reasons that number has gotten smaller, 
but it has. It will get even smaller if 8 more years of sequestration 
come to pass.
  Now, the administration put out a plan 3 years ago when they looked 
out 10 years and said: What should our strategy be? Then they looked 
out 10 years and said: What are the likely resources?
  When they put that plan out, they said: we know we are going to have 
to live with, roughly, $500 billion less than we thought we were. We 
can do it. Here is the strategy. Here is the plan that fits that.
  Since then, the budget has been shredded. It has been cut by even 
more. The plan they put forward now recognizes the fact that it doesn't 
fund what they would like to fund because Congress passed a budget that 
cuts the Defense Department by more than they would like. In fact, the 
administration asked for an additional $28 billion this year and an 
additional $150 billion over 5 years, in order to fully fund that.
  That, apparently, is not forthcoming, so what they did is they put 
forward a series of proposals to try as best as they could to save 
money in a way that protects our force, and they did it in a number of 
different areas.
  They proposed a BRAC; they proposed about $2 billion in savings over 
5 years to various personnel accounts; they got rid of the A-10; they 
got rid of the U-2; they proposed laying up 14 ships. Those were the 
main proposals out.
  I am sorry. I forgot that they proposed shifting air assets in the 
Guard and Reserve to save $12 billion over 5 years. Those were the 
proposals they put on the table.
  The problem with this bill is that it rejects every single one of 
those proposals. How do we make the money work on that? Primarily by 
creative accounting; with the Guard and Reserve, for instance, we say 
no changes can be made in 2015.
  They weren't planning on making any changes in 2015 that were going 
to cost money, but if this stops them from

[[Page 8585]]

doing it going forward, they are put into a deep hole.
  On the 14 ships that they wanted to lay up, we raid the modernization 
account to pay for keeping those 14 ships operational. So we get 
creative about it, but next year, the reckoning will come, frankly, 
sequestration or no sequestration. If sequestration happens, it is 
going to be really bad; but even if it doesn't, we still will not have 
addressed the long-term needs of our budget.
  I will have a couple of amendments, one on BRAC and one on those 14 
ships, that will give us an opportunity to, I think, make a better 
choice because the other way that we are able to preserve those 
programs is that we cut from the President's budget about $1.8 billion 
in readiness.
  $1.2 billion is clear. The other 633 was to save the A-10, and it 
comes out of OCO. A good chunk of OCO goes to rebuild readiness; so 
basically, we take $1.8 billion out of readiness, which puts us down 
the path to a hollow force that none of us wants. As we go forward to 
conference, we are going to need to make some of those tougher choices.
  I do thank the chairman for his work and for what is contained in 
this bill. I look forward to debating the amendments, and I look 
forward to--knock on wood--passing for the 53rd straight year the 
National Defense Authorization Act, as is our primary responsibility.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. Thornberry), my friend and colleague, who is the vice 
chairman of the Armed Services Committee and who is the chairman of the 
Intelligence, Emerging Threats, and Capabilities Subcommittee.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. I thank the chairman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, I want to start by commending the leadership of 
Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith in getting this bill to the 
floor in such a timely way, especially after the President's budget was 
quite late, but also in getting this bill here on a unanimous vote by 
the committee.
  None of us agrees with every provision that is in this bill, but 
members of the committee were able to put aside personal preferences on 
individual issues to support a bill that benefits the Nation overall, 
and I hope that the House will do likewise.
  I think it is important to emphasize that it has been a bipartisan 
effort, working together with the chairman and the ranking member and 
also with the chairmen of the subcommittees and with the ranking 
members of the subcommittees, that has gotten us to this place.
  I think it is especially appropriate for this bill to be named for 
Chairman McKeon, not only in recognition for his leadership on this 
bill, but for his leadership of the committee during some very 
challenging circumstances throughout his tenure.
  Some of those challenges have included our own budget issues, as was 
just addressed by the ranking member, as well as a myriad of threats 
around the world, so this measure that does so much for our country's 
security will always be associated with the many contributions of 
Chairman McKeon to our country's security.
  Mr. Chairman, this bill meets the budget targets of the House-passed 
budget resolution and also of the Ryan-Murray budget agreement. I agree 
with the ranking member in that it does not solve our budget issues in 
the future--we still have to grapple with those--but this year, it 
meets those requirements, and it does so by making some difficult 
choices.
  In addition, among the many provisions of this bill, there are those 
that start to make a modest start on some defense reforms that are 
being worked on by both the House and the Senate in coordination with 
the Pentagon and with private industry.
  I think everyone recognizes that we have to find a way to get more 
defense out of the money we spend, and there are some small but 
important steps to enable us to make greater progress in that area in 
the future, both by reducing overhead and by improving the way we 
acquire goods and services.
  This bill is also active in all areas of responsibility for the 
Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats, and Capabilities, 
including military cyber, science and technology, information 
technology, defense intelligence, special operations, and 
counterterrorism and irregular warfare.
  I agree with the ranking member on the importance, especially, of 
cyber and special operations. In addition, we have coordinated with 
other subcommittees on a number of provisions that touch on the areas I 
have mentioned. In fact, I think the work among the subcommittees has 
been closer than I have ever seen it.
  In that regard, I want to express my appreciation for my partner on 
the IETC Subcommittee, the gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin), 
for all of his insights and cooperative spirit that make our work 
together so beneficial and rewarding. Like the chairman, I appreciate 
all of the work of the staffs of the subcommittee and the full 
committee.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin), the ranking member of the 
Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee.
  Mr. LANGEVIN. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
  I would like to begin by thanking Chairman McKeon for his leadership 
of the committee and for all of his years of dedication to national 
security. It is appropriate that this act is named after him.
  I want to thank and recognize the ranking member, Adam Smith, for his 
leadership on the committee as well. He deeply cares about national 
security, and I appreciate the work that he has done on this mark.
  I also want to thank Congressman Mac Thornberry, the chair of the 
Intelligence, Emerging Threats, and Capabilities Subcommittee. It has 
been a privilege working with him. As the ranking member of the IETC 
Subcommittee, I do appreciate his bipartisan work, and I am pleased 
with the bill that we have produced this year.
  Mr. Chairman, the IETC portion of the bill authorizes approximately 
$7.6 billion for the U.S. Special Operations Command. Authorities 
necessary for Special Operations Forces to combat terrorism are 
extended in the bill, which also provides an additional $20 million for 
the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office, which gives our 
Special Operations Forces the cutting-edge capabilities and 
technologies that they need.
  The IETC Subcommittee also made investments in emerging technologies 
like electrical weapons, and I want to commend especially the Navy's 
efforts to move technologies like directed energy and railguns, in 
particular, out of the labs and into the field.
  Getting this game-changing technology into the hands of the Nation's 
sailors and into the hands of all of our warfighters will ultimately 
serve to realize the promise of research investment.
  In addition to our focus on research and development efforts, we must 
also put investments into education programs, so that there is a 
qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics--or STEM--
talent pool to benefit the DOD.
  I am particularly pleased that the bill provides a total of $55.5 
million for the National Defense Education Program. Additionally, the 
IETC portion of the bill includes provisions to strengthen the 
oversight of the intelligence community while ensuring that combat and 
commander intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements 
are met.
  The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Rice of South Carolina). The time of the 
gentleman has expired.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield the gentleman an additional 1 
minute.
  Mr. LANGEVIN. I thank the ranking member.
  Mr. Chairman, last but certainly not least, the bill also supports 
cyber operations and U.S. Cyber Command, while reducing redundant 
programs and increasing transparency and oversight.

[[Page 8586]]



                              {time}  1945

  As recent revelations of cyber incidents demonstrate, a trained and 
ready cyber force and robust defensive capabilities have never been 
more integral to our national security.
  These are just but a few of the highlights in the bill. In the 
interest of time, I will end there. But I do want to again thank the 
chairman and the ranking member for their leadership, all the members 
of the Armed Services Committee, as well as the staff of the committee, 
for all the work that they have put into this mark.
  I urge my colleagues to support the bill.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Virginia (Mr. Forbes), my friend and colleague and a member of the 
Armed Services Committee and chairman of the Seapower and Projection 
Forces Subcommittee.
  Mr. FORBES. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. With the 
chairman's leadership and stewardship, I believe that this bill 
provides the right authorities within the budget limits provided.
  I continue to be impressed by Chairman McKeon's commitment to our 
national defense and particularly his leadership and zeal to complete 
the 54th annual National Defense Authorization Act. His inspirational 
determination and effort to provide for our national security will 
undoubtedly serve as a benchmark for our future.
  I also want to recognize my friend and ranking member of the Seapower 
and Projection Forces Subcommittee on the occasion of his retirement 
from the House of Representatives. Mike McIntyre has been a resolute 
supporter of the men and women in uniform. His departure after 
providing 18 years of support for our national defense and this 
institution will be sorely missed.
  As to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, I 
continue to be concerned about the trajectory of our national defense 
and believe that our national security will be irreparably harmed if we 
continue on our current path. History is full of examples of nation-
states that underestimate the value of national security and the severe 
consequences of their failure. Our inability to change these trend 
lines will be measured in the sweat and blood of the men and women whom 
we collectively hold in such high esteem.
  While we support these men and women in words, I fear that the real 
damage to our servicemembers is being caused by the benign neglect of 
this administration and, at times, Congress, in terms of funding and 
effort. We must not stand idly by watching the continued dismantling of 
the world's finest military.
  As to the Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee mark, I am 
pleased that we were successful in reversing the administration 
recommendation to eliminate an aircraft carrier. By restoring $796 
million for the long lead item procurement and detailed planning for 
the refueling and complex overhaul of the USS George Washington, we are 
taking the right steps to retain strategic options for future 
Presidents.
  I am also pleased that we funded two Arleigh Burke class destroyers, 
two Virginia class submarines, and two littoral combat ships. I want to 
especially highlight our incremental funding of the San Antonio class 
amphibious ship. This amphib will bring important support to our United 
States Marine Corps as we continue our strategic rebalance toward the 
Pacific.
  I remain very pleased with the direction of our projection forces. 
This bill provides strategic Air Force investments in terms of 
procuring 13 C-130J military transport variants, six KC-46A tankers, 
and significant research and development investments in the long-range 
strike bomber.
  While we have a long way to go to reverse some negative trends, I 
think this bill does a good job of supporting our forces within the 
budget constraints provided. However, we need to vigorously and 
resolutely seek another path to change our national security funding 
trajectory.
  I think this bill is another positive step on a long road to 
adequately support our national security, and I would urge my 
colleagues to support the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentlelady from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez), ranking member of the 
Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chair, I thank the ranking 
member and my colleague from California, Chairman McKeon, in 
particular, for all the work and guidance that he has given us as he 
leaves the Congress at the end of this year. I am sure we will fete you 
in better ways, but thank you for the work you have done.
  I want to thank the chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces 
Subcommittee, Chairman Mike Turner, for his leadership this year.
  We have worked in a bipartisan manner. We have had three critical 
goals in mind as we have done this: Supporting our troops with the 
equipment that they need, cutting wasteful spending, and investing in 
our future.
  The subcommittee's portion of H.R. 4435 supports all of the high-
priority acquisition programs in the President's budget.
  H.R. 4435 provides $8.3 billion for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, 
$3.8 billion for Army aviation upgrades, $1.4 billion for the Ospreys, 
and $997 million for U.S. Marine Corps ground equipment.
  However, our subcommittee didn't just rubberstamp everything. We 
actually took a very careful look at what programs were working, which 
ones were slow, and what wasn't getting done. We were able to identify 
more than $600 million in funding that we put in other places in the 
bill. They were used to increase funding in numerous areas in an effort 
to provide additional equipment for our military and preserve critical 
production capabilities for the future.
  Specifically, the bill provides an additional $450 million for the 
EA-18G Growler aircraft for the Navy, $340 million for additional 
ground combat vehicles for the Army, $80 million in additional funds 
for the procurement of body armor, $250 million in funding for the 
National Guard and Reserve equipment account, and numerous other 
investments.
  Finally, the chairman's mark includes important oversight legislation 
on numerous major DOD programs to ensure that the Congress has the 
information it needs to make future judgments.
  Mr. Chair, for the past year, the House Armed Services Committee has 
conducted an ``Oversight of the Asia Pacific Rebalance.'' This 
initiative was brought forth by the collective leadership of Chairman 
Buck McKeon and Ranking Member Adam Smith. I would also recognize 
Chairman Randy Forbes and Congresswoman Colleen Hanabusa for their 
great efforts on this critical committee engagement, culminating in 
their legislative contributions to the NDAA we consider here today.
  Without question, the Asia Pacific Rebalance constitutes one of 
America's most important military and security policies. The Chairman 
and I both represent districts in a state with vast ties to the Asia 
Pacific--whether political, security, military, economic, cultural, 
social and even people-to-people exchange. We also have a vibrant Asian 
American community in our state that is an embodiment of our 
relationship with this critically important region.
  It is within this context that I wish to raise an important issue and 
one that I feel is central to the Asia Pacific Rebalance. Let me be 
clear that I feel this issue is both germane to the jurisdiction of 
this committee and our consideration of the NDAA on the Floor.
  As you and our colleagues on this committee are well aware, more than 
200,000 young women and girls from throughout Asia and the Pacific, but 
mainly from Korea, were forced to become sex slaves during World War II 
by the Imperial Armed Forces of Japan. For over 70 years, these women 
endured unspeakable and nightmarish ordeals and have yet to receive a 
formal apology.
  There are those who believe that the Comfort Women issue is a 
controversial historical dispute that is not germane to our committee's

[[Page 8587]]

jurisdiction or the NDAA. I fundamentally disagree. As a case in point, 
during President Obama's recent Asia trip a couple of weeks ago, he 
specifically brought up the Comfort Women issue. At a joint press 
conference with Korean President Park Geun-Hye, President Obama stated 
that what happened to the Comfort Women was ``terrible and egregious,'' 
that these ``women deserved to be heard and respected'' and that 
``there should be an accurate and clear account of what happened.'' 
President Obama made these remarks in the context of U.S.-Korea-Japan 
relations and the Asia Rebalance.
  The Comfort Women survivors are dying by the day. Of the over 200,000 
survivors less than 100 are still alive today. As a matter of valuing 
women's rights and human rights, these Comfort Women survivors deserve 
the dignity of a formal apology by the Japanese Government. I further 
urge Japan to follow the recommendations set forth in H. Res. 121 that 
was authored by my friend and colleague, Representative Michael Honda 
and passed the House on June 30, 2007. Proper resolution to this issue 
yields the benefit of closer U.S.-Korea-Japan trilateral relations 
which is critical to countering the North Korean nuclear threat and 
enhancing security ties with our allies.
  Mr. Chair, I wish to reiterate the importance of this issue to our 
committee, our constituents, our state, our nation and our allies. I 
urge my colleagues to also offer expressions of support for the Comfort 
Women survivors.
  The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield the gentlelady an additional 1 
minute.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. This is a good government bill. 
Please vote for it.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
South Carolina (Mr. Wilson), my friend and colleague and a member of 
the Armed Services Committee and chairman of the Military Personnel 
Subcommittee.
  Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Thank you, Chairman McKeon, for your 
leadership. Congratulations on the deserved naming in your honor of the 
National Defense Authorization Act.
  Mr. Chair, the military personnel provisions of H.R. 4435 are a 
product of an open, bipartisan process. H.R. 4435 provides our 
warfighters, veterans, and military families the care and support they 
need, deserve, and have earned.
  Specifically, this year's proposal continues to refine the Department 
of Defense sexual assault and response program while at the same time 
actively monitoring the Department's implementation of the significant 
reforms enacted by Congress over the past 2 years.
  In particular, the mark requires performance evaluations for 
commanding officers to include assessments of the command climate 
pertaining to sexual assault.
  In addition, the mark would require the Secretary of Defense to 
conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent organization 
experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the defense commissary 
system and reverse some of the reductions to the commissary system.
  The mark would express the sense of Congress that the United States 
has a responsibility to continue to search for missing or captured 
members of the Armed Forces, leaving no one behind.
  Additionally, this would standardize the collection reporting and 
assessments of suicide data involving members of the Armed Forces and 
their family members.
  Although the mark follows the administration's request for annual end 
strength reductions, I have serious reservations about the end strength 
and force structure reduction of our military. America remains at war 
today, and will continue a global conflict with murderous illegal enemy 
combatants.
  We must not forget the attacks of September 11, 2001, and September 
11, 2012, in the global war on terrorism.
  This report does not include the administration's request for 
military retirees to pay more for health care. Congress established the 
Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission, and we 
need to be informed of their analysis before proceeding with changes 
impacting military families.
  In conclusion, I want to thank Ranking Member Susan Davis and her 
staff for their input in this process. We were joined by an active, 
informed, and dedicated group of subcommittee members supported by a 
professional staff in the tradition of the late John Chapla.
  I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McIntyre), the ranking member on the 
Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee.
  Mr. McINTYRE. Mr. Chairman, the Seapower and Projection Forces 
portion of this bill continues this subcommittee's tradition of strong 
bipartisan support for our men and women in uniform. I would like to 
thank Subcommittee Chairman Forbes for working together in such an open 
and bipartisan manner.
  This is a good bill. This is an extremely challenging time, we know, 
for the Department of Defense, given the fiscal constraints that it is 
being required to operate under.
  With this bill, the Armed Services Committee has attempted to strike 
the difficult balance of providing for the current force while also 
looking forward to the requirements of the future force.
  I am pleased in particular this bill includes provisions that restore 
funding for the refueling and complex overhaul of the USS George 
Washington, which is the first step needed to ensure we maintain the 
requirement of 11 aircraft carriers. This bill also authorizes two 
Virginia class submarines, two Arleigh Burke destroyers, and an 
additional 96 Tomahawk missiles.
  This bill creates a national sea-based deterrence fund that is 
designed to provide the Navy with some flexibility when it begins 
construction of the Ohio class replacement submarine.
  With this being my last defense bill before retiring at the end of 
this term, I want to thank my good friend Randy Forbes for his 
leadership as chairman of the subcommittee and his friendship through 
the years.
  I also want to thank my friend and my classmate, Adam Smith, for his 
great leadership, and our gracious chairman, Buck McKeon, for the 
leadership that he has given our committee overall and for his 
friendship as well. I wish him well on his retirement.
  I am glad that all of these gentleman that I have named and those 
that I have served with on the subcommittee and the full committee have 
together shared that position for making sure we do right by our men 
and women in uniform.
  With that, Mr. Speaker, I support the passage of this defense bill. I 
urge other Members here in the Congress to do the same.
  I pray God's blessings be upon all of those who serve and will 
benefit from this bill.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Ohio (Mr. Turner), my friend and colleague and a member of the Armed 
Services Committee and chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces 
Subcommittee.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of H.R. 4435, the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
  I want to begin by thanking Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith 
for their leadership in this committee and this being truly a 
bipartisan effort.
  This will be Chairman McKeon's last bill. He has not only been a 
leader for our committee and in Congress, but he has been a tremendous 
mentor for so many of us in Congress. His legacy will leave a lasting 
impact not only in legislation affecting the Department of Defense, our 
national security, and our men and women in uniform, but the Members of 
Congress who serve. And certainly, as we look to the future of the 
Armed Services Committee, his legacy will be in his mentoring of the 
other members of the committee.
  I serve as chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee 
as well as the cochair of the Military Sexual Assault Prevention 
Caucus. I first want to thank the subcommittee's ranking member, 
Loretta Sanchez from California, for her support in completing the 
markup of this bill.

[[Page 8588]]

  The committee's focus has been to support the men and women of the 
Armed Forces and their families, providing them the equipment they need 
and the support that they so deserve. This bill helps to retain defense 
technology superiority, sustains the defense industrial base, and 
maintains effective modernization for our military.
  The committee bill includes additional funding for Abrams Tanks, 
Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Stryker Combat Vehicles, Tactical Wheeled 
Vehicles, body armor, and unmanned aerial systems.
  I believe the committee bill strikes the appropriate balance between 
equipping our military to effectively carry out its mission while also 
providing aggressive oversight to ensure appropriate use of taxpayers' 
dollars.
  The bill again this year takes a significant step in combating the 
issue of sexual assault in the military by incorporating the FAIR 
Military Act of 2014, a bipartisan bill first introduced by myself and 
Representative Niki Tsongas.
  I would like to thank Representative Tsongas, Military Personnel 
Subcommittee Chairman Joe Wilson, and Representative Davis, ranking 
member on the Personnel Subcommittee, for their leadership on this 
issue. I want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for 
their leadership that has allowed a bipartisan solution on sexual 
assault.
  Under this bill, Congress limits the use of the ``good soldier 
defense,'' which allows a defendant to cite unrelated, subjective 
factors during trial, such as military record. It requires commanders 
be assessed on their ability to create a climate where a victim can 
report a crime without fear of retaliation. It ensures that the changes 
and provisions regarding military sexual assault prevention from the 
FY14 defense authorization apply to the military service academies.

                              {time}  2000

  Finally, this bill provides the child custody protections that our 
military men and women deserve.
  I, again, want to thank Chairman McKeon for his help on protecting 
the custody rights of our men and women in uniform. No longer will our 
men and women face deployment while having to worry whether or not they 
have the custody of their children upon return.
  I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this bill 
and to vote ``yes'' on H.R. 4435.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Davis), ranking member of the 
Military Personnel Subcommittee.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank Mr. Wilson 
and the committee staff for working in a bipartisan manner to develop 
this bill.
  The Buck McKeon NDAA continues the committee's focus on sexual 
assault and includes such provisions as requiring the judicial panel to 
assess the use of mental health records by the defense in preliminary 
hearings and to compare this with the civilian use of mental health 
records in criminal proceedings; clarifying that the service academies, 
including the Coast Guard Academy, are subject to the same sexual 
harassment and assault requirements; requiring an inspector general 
review of the separation records of servicemembers who made 
unrestricted reports and determining whether such separation was in 
retaliation for filing said report; requiring performance appraisals of 
a commanding officer to include whether a command climate has been 
established in which allegations of sexual assault are properly managed 
and victims feel free to report; and requiring the Secretary of Defense 
to modify rule 404 of the Military Rules of Evidence to clarify that 
general military character of an accused is not admissible, except in 
cases where the military character of the accused is relevant to the 
offense being charged.
  Mr. Chairman, oversight of sexual assault in the military remains a 
priority of the committee, and we will continue to identify gaps that 
need to be addressed and to enable the Department of Defense to reduce 
these numbers.
  We all want to get to the same place--safe working conditions and a 
harassment-free, sexual assault-free environment for all, and there are 
different views of how to get there; but the bill, as it is now, gives 
us the opportunity to create a military where change can and must 
occur.
  On other personnel matters, our bill does not include the proposed 
legislative changes to the commissary system, housing allowances, and 
the health care modifications requested by the Department of Defense.
  As a result of that, the Department will need to address the $1.5 
billion savings it already took in its fiscal year 2015 budget.
  The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield the gentlewoman an additional 30 
seconds.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. In addition, the restoration of the 1 
percent COLA reduction that was in the budget agreement and restored 
earlier this year left the Department with an additional hole of $500 
million for fiscal year 2015, and these savings will need to be paid 
for from other Department of Defense accounts.
  We must begin that discussion, and I hope that the Military 
Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission will be the start 
of that.
  We know these are difficult times, and difficult decisions need to be 
made to protect and sustain our All-Volunteer Force. It has already 
been stated that ignoring these issues will only lead the Department to 
take significant cuts to our end strength and readiness.
  Despite these concerns though, Mr. Chairman, this bill deserves 
passage.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Alabama (Mr. Rogers), my friend and colleague, a member of the Armed 
Services Committee and the chairman of the Strategic Forces 
Subcommittee.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in support of the 
Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2015.
  This is an important annual bill, not just because, as you have 
heard, it is the 53rd in a row; it is what is in the bill for our men 
and women in uniform and our national security that counts.
  For example, we fully support the Israeli Cooperative programs, 
including Iron Dome, while also continuing to make progress on U.S.-
based coproduction to strengthen our ally, Israel.
  We include increased resources for our GMD system, which is our only 
homeland missile defense capability.
  We support critical nuclear weapons capabilities, including programs 
the President promised to support as a part of the deal to ratify the 
New START treaty, which are $2 billion short of what was promised with 
several key programs years behind schedule.
  We have initiated in this bill the development of a competitively 
sourced next-generation rocket engine. We will not permit the 
kleptocrats in charge of Russia to hold our national security space 
programs hostage. It is past time that we reinvigorate our rocket motor 
industrial base.
  I am pleased that we also are able to begin a pilot program for a new 
and more commonsense public-private partnership acquisition approach 
for the procurement of commercial satellite communication services.
  We also begin the same public-private partnership process to deal 
with the scores of obsolete, decrepit, nonnuclear facilities in the 
NNSA.
  Mr. Chairman, in taking a look at the amendments that were filed with 
the Rules Committee, it is clear to me that plenty of our colleagues 
are not happy with the tough choices made by the 2-year budget deal 
reached last year, and I join them.
  As we debate these amendments over the next couple of days, I think 
Members will see what those of us on the Armed Services Committee have 
been warning for about a year. There are no more easy choices. We are 
not just cutting into the muscle and bone; we are amputating vital 
limbs.
  I have a warning for every Member of this body. If you think the 
choices that we made were tough this year, wait till next year, when 
sequestration returns.

[[Page 8589]]

  I wish to thank the ranking member, the gentleman, and my friend from 
Tennessee, for his outstanding leadership on this subcommittee.
  I wish to thank Chairman McKeon for all he has done over his long 
career for the men and women of our armed services. They may never know 
all he has done for them, but I know. If he had to do it here again, he 
would.
  Mr. Chairman, I thank you for your service, and I look forward to 
working with you to see that the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National 
Defense Authorization Act is signed into law later this year.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I now yield 2 minutes to the 
gentlewoman from Massachusetts (Ms. Tsongas), the ranking member of the 
Oversight and Investigation Subcommittee.
  Ms. TSONGAS. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 4435. I want to 
begin by thanking Chairman McKeon for his decades of service in the 
House and for his evenhanded tenure leading the Armed Services 
Committee.
  I also want to thank Ranking Member Smith for his leadership and his 
willingness to address the tough issues that face the United States 
military.
  This year's NDAA takes further necessary steps toward eliminating 
sexual assault in our military ranks. I appreciate the efforts of 
Congressman Wilson and Congresswoman Davis to ensure the inclusion of 
the FAIR Military Act into this bill.
  I would also like to thank my cochair of the Military Sexual Assault 
Prevention Caucus and coauthor of the FAIR Military Act, Congressman 
Mike Turner.
  The fiscal year '15 NDAA ensures servicemembers at all levels are 
held to the highest standard, and no more will the so-called ``good 
soldier defense'' allow criminal behavior to go unpunished and prevent 
justice from prevailing.
  This NDAA also makes strides toward addressing the epidemic of 
suicide surrounding our military. It requires the Department of Defense 
to establish a system to track all suicides and attempted suicides for 
Active Duty, Reserves, and Guard servicemembers, as well as military 
family members, so that we can better understand the full scope of this 
tragedy.
  I would also like to highlight the important work that his bill does 
with regard to research and development. In this era of increasingly 
capable enemies and constrained budgets, the DOD must rapidly take 
advantage of technological advancements and deliver these capabilities 
to the field.
  Key provisions in the NDAA will enhance the DOD's ability to recruit 
and retain the Nation's best talent, talent needed to develop the 
resources that are key to keeping servicemembers safe and successful 
around the globe.
  Similarly, I was encouraged that this bill incorporates language 
creating opportunities for investment in critical R&D programs like the 
Combat Feeding program at Natick Soldier Systems. This center finds 
ways to make sure our servicemembers are fed and fed well in some of 
the world's most unforgiving climates.
  Finally, I would like to thank the committee staff who worked closely 
with all of our staffs to include these important provisions in the 
bill.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Virginia (Mr. Wittman), my friend and colleague, a member of the Armed 
Services Committee and the chairman of the Readiness Subcommittee.
  Mr. WITTMAN. Mr. Chairman, and Ranking Member Smith, thank you so 
much for your leadership in leading this bill to the floor.
  I rise in support of the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense 
Authorization Act, which provides funding for ongoing operations in 
Afghanistan and, most critically, for our men and women on the front 
lines, where they continue to fight and die on our behalf each and 
every day.
  No one in this Chamber should forget that most of the decisions we 
make impact them first and foremost. It is our constitutional 
responsibility and should be our highest priority to ensure that they 
have the training and equipment they need to do their missions and come 
home safely. We must be committed to ensuring that our force is always 
ready to respond if a crisis arises.
  This bill attempts to limit operational risk, while also balancing 
present and future readiness requirements with an unrealistic and 
ultimately damaging topline.
  When we legislate to an arbitrary budget number rather than to a 
national security strategy, we inevitably make ill-advised choices that 
impact our capacity and capability to respond to global threats, such 
as the crisis in Ukraine, an emboldened and increasingly aggressive 
Russia, an increasingly aggressive China, and growing tensions in the 
Asia Pacific.
  If circumstances demand that we call up our forces to respond at this 
point in time, our military options would be limited.
  That is why I strongly oppose BRAC at this time. We just don't have 
the money to fund it, and we have higher priorities that directly 
impact the safety of our troops, and every effort and every dollar must 
be focused on them.
  This means funding the Marine Corps Air-Ground Task Forces, or 
MAGTAFs, in SOUTHCOM and CENTCOM, which are needed to secure embassy 
and military installations across the globe, a requirement made clear 
after the terrorist attack at Benghazi; funding flying hour programs, 
training, and depot maintenance across the services; ensuring robust 
steaming days critical to fleet training; and restoring CVN-73 funding 
to retain its viability as a fleet asset.
  These fixes, of course, don't alleviate my concerns about readiness 
shortfalls or risk to our warfighters. We here in Washington need to do 
all we can to decrease such risks.
  We ask a lot of our men and women who serve. We must not ask them to 
go into a fight without the training and equipment they need to 
succeed.
  When I took my oath of office to serve in Congress, I swore that I 
would abide by the principles laid out in the Constitution to ensure a 
robust national defense. While I believe this bill reflects that 
commitment, we cannot lose sight of the fact that FY16 is ominously 
looming, and sequestration remains the law of the land.
  The short-term and often shortsighted choices we have been forced to 
make will only exacerbate our readiness levels.
  We must continue to focus on restoring the readiness lost as a result 
of sequestration, but the fact remains that the national security 
requirements, as outlined in the defense strategy, far exceed the 
budget.
  I remain deeply concerned about the overall readiness of our force, 
not just the men and women that are fighting in Afghanistan, but those 
stationed around the globe. We must ensure they are properly trained, 
equipped, and prepared to meet the challenges on the horizon with 
overwhelming strength and superiority.
  It is time to fix sequestration and start budgeting to meet our 
defense strategy, not a senseless and arbitrary budget number.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Garamendi), a member of the committee.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, congratulations to the chair of the 
committee and the ranking member for putting together a unanimous 
bipartisan bill. There is much to say in this bill that is good, and I 
would like to say about two things. One, the ISR capabilities of the 
military, particularly the Air Force, are maintained in this bill. The 
U-2 and the Global Hawk will continue to operate and provide critical 
intelligence to our military, operating now in the Sahel of Africa, 
chasing off Boko Haram.
  This bill also provides us with the continuability to get to where we 
need to go. The KC-10 will remain in the force for the foreseeable 
future, until it is fully replaced by the KC-46s.
  All of this is good. You need to know what is going on around the 
world, and you need to be able to get there, and this bill provides for 
that.

[[Page 8590]]

  However, there are issues in this bill that we need to spend some 
time working on. It has been some 20 years since we have taken a hard 
look at the nuclear triad, an extraordinarily expensive and 
extraordinarily dangerous part of our military apparatus.
  We are talking nuclear weapons here and the triad--the bombers, the 
ICBMs, and the submarines.

                              {time}  2015

  How do they fit? What do we need? How much do we really need to spend 
upon them?
  Also, the nuclear weapons that go with them. The rebuilding of our 
nuclear weapons is a 20- to 30-year process, and we are talking about 
tens of billions of dollars. Too much? Enough? Maybe. Too much? 
Probably.
  We also have to dispose of some 43 tons of unnecessary plutonium. How 
is that going to be done at the Savannah facility? There is money in 
this budget to continue a dead-end process. We ought to take a new look 
at that. And there will be amendments that will be proposed.
  And finally, the big elephant in the room. We are talking about 
Afghanistan. $74 billion in this bill not debated, not discussed. We 
must do that. It is our obligation as Members of the House of 
Representatives and the representatives of the people of the United 
States to talk about what we are going to do in Afghanistan, and that 
needs to be done.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Nevada, Dr. Heck, my friend and colleague, who is a member of the Armed 
Services Committee and is the chairman of the Oversight and 
Investigations Subcommittee.
  Mr. HECK of Nevada. Mr. Chairman, I rise to thank the committee 
chairman, the gentleman from California, for his years of service to 
the Nation, this body, and for his mentorship, and also to voice my 
strong support for H.R. 4435, the National Defense Authorization Act of 
2014.
  The bill under consideration is the result of an open process that 
truly reflects the bipartisan nature of the House Armed Services 
Committee and the bipartisan support of our military men and women.
  Although fiscal realities and constrained resources have forced us to 
make difficult trade-offs, the committee maintained its commitment to 
those currently serving in uniform as well as to our veterans and their 
families.
  In last year's NDAA, Congress established the Military Compensation 
and Retirement Commission to evaluate and analyze potential reforms to 
pay and benefits. This report, expected to be delivered in February of 
2015, will inform the debate on the future of military and retiree 
compensation. As such, I am pleased that this bill rejects the 
Department's request to cut the pay and benefits of our troops, which 
would have included significant reforms to TRICARE and cuts to housing 
and commissary benefits.
  Any attempts to change pay and benefits before Congress receives the 
commission's report are premature and ill-advised, and I applaud the 
committee for rejecting these proposals and for remaining steadfast in 
its support of our servicemembers, our veterans, and their families.
  Mr. Chairman, H.R. 4435 also acknowledges the work that the Armed 
Services Committee has completed over the last year to address some of 
the deficiencies made evident by the tragedy in Benghazi. The 
Department of Defense has determined that being prepared for an 
uncertain, volatile, complex, and ambiguous security environment, 
especially at remote diplomatic outposts, is the new normal that 
confronts our Nation. This bill expresses concern that U.S. Africa 
Command does not have sufficient assigned military forces, including 
specialized military capabilities, which this new normal requires.
  As such, this legislation requires the Secretary of Defense, in 
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Chairman of the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff, to submit a report on how this evolving security 
environment has changed AFRICOM's force posture and force structure 
requirements. This provision will help ensure that AFRICOM receives the 
resources it needs to protect posts in high-risk, high-threat areas and 
the capability to respond to future crises.
  Mr. Chairman, H.R. 4435 is an important bill that strikes the 
appropriate balance between priorities in a fiscally constrained 
environment. I urge my colleagues to support the Howard P. ``Buck'' 
McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gallego), a member of the committee.
  Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. Chairman, I, too, would like to thank Chairman 
McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for their leadership. I am glad to have 
had the opportunity to work with and learn from each of them, and I 
certainly wish the chairman well in his future endeavors.
  This legislation marks more than 50 years of bipartisan agreements on 
national defense. Not many committees in the U.S. Congress can say 
that. As a new Member, I am proud to be part of that tradition.
  However, the bill only buys us a little time. Unless Congress 
provides relief from sequestration, next year's decisions will be 
exponentially more difficult. Yet we must do everything to be sure that 
our sons and daughters have what they need to be successful and safe, 
both at home and abroad. That means training or weapons or materials or 
supplies or equipment or machinery. Our sons and our daughters deserve 
the very best.
  Texas is extremely proud of its connection to our military. Important 
installations like Fort Bliss, Laughlin Air Force Base, and Joint Base 
San Antonio are core parts of our economy and our communities. Texas is 
home to many of our warfighters--soldiers, sailors, airmen, and 
marines--and both the civilian and military personnel who support them.
  I, too, am proud to support our men and women in uniform. Thus, I 
urge all of my colleagues to support this bill and, like today, work in 
a bipartisan fashion that ends sequestration tomorrow, and from here on 
out, work in that same bipartisan fashion.
  May God's blessings be upon all the men and women in uniform who are 
impacted by this bill and their families.
  I want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith. It was a 
pleasure working with them both on this bill.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentlelady from 
Indiana (Mrs. Walorski), my friend and colleague, who is a member of 
the Armed Services Committee.
  Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, we have the strongest and best military 
in the world.
  Thanks to the hard work of Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith, 
this year's defense bill works within budgetary constraints to ensure 
that our military continues to have the best people, the best training, 
and the best hardware. This bill guards against irresponsible cuts to 
pay and benefits. It improves readiness, and it provides our men and 
women in uniform with the vital aircraft, ships, and ground vehicles 
they need to fight and win today's increasingly complex battle space.
  We also included several bipartisan commonsense provisions that build 
on our important work last year to combat military sexual assault.
  We hold Russia accountable for its aggression against Ukraine and its 
treaty violations.
  Finally, we lay the groundwork for a comprehensive defense reform 
effort, including finding ways to stretch the taxpayer dollars for the 
defense of this Nation.
  I urge my colleagues to support this bill.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of 
my time.
  I just want to again thank the chairman for his leadership and thank 
all of the folks who have done so much hard work in pulling this bill 
together.
  I will make two other quick points. One, to sort of reemphasize, we 
have

[[Page 8591]]

heard a couple of times that this bill makes the tough choices. I can't 
see one at this point. You know, we have sort of dodged and bobbed and 
weaved. Some of that I actually support. Some of it made sense.
  One of the issues that we have to wrestle with on the committee is 
how do we preserve the industrial base? When you are talking about 
making submarines or tanks or jet fighters, if you don't keep making 
them, you can't say, well, we are going to shut it down for 3 years and 
then we are going to start making them again, because that workforce is 
gone, the plants are gone. Those decisions do have to be made.
  I just think at this point, on balance, in this instance, every 
single hard choice that the administration laid out on compensation--I 
know health care is difficult. I think that the men and women who serve 
in our military should have the best health care while they are serving 
and after of anyone in this country, and they will. But there is an 
important statistic.
  In 1996, your average servicemember paid 27 percent of the cost of 
his or her health care. This year, that number is 10 percent. Why? 
Because health care costs went through the ceiling, but we didn't raise 
a single penny in costs for anyone serving in the military. Is that 
sustainable?
  They also make cuts in some of the subsidies for the commissaries, 
subsidies for housing. They looked for places where they could save 
some money. Again, no BRAC. Again, the A-10 we keep. The ships we keep. 
I understand those decisions, but they are building up an awful bow 
wave.
  And the final thing I will say is that I will again bring my 
amendment on closing Guantanamo Bay. The one thing we are slowly 
learning is that as we, fortunately, get fewer and fewer inmates in 
Guantanamo, it becomes more and more expensive to maintain what was 
supposed to be a temporary facility. Aside from all the arguments about 
how the international community feels about Guantanamo, arguments that 
President George W. Bush made when he said he supported closing 
Guantanamo, it is the sheer cost of maintaining that prison in such an 
obscure place. So I will again offer that amendment, and again we will 
have a robust debate on it.
  But the one point I want to make on that amendment--we have heard 
people say, well, gosh, we can't release these people in the United 
States. We are not going to release them in the United States. We are 
going to lock them up, as we currently lock up over 300 terrorists, 
countless mass murderers, and some of the worst, most violent people 
this country knows. They are locked up in secure facilities. We can do 
the same with the dangerous inmates who remain at Guantanamo. But 
keeping Guantanamo open is not intelligent, both in terms of cost and 
in terms of our standing in the international community.
  With that, I look forward to seeing how many of those 320 amendments 
the Rules Committee is going to throw at us, and I look forward to a 
robust debate starting this evening into the next couple of days.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Chairman, this has been a great opportunity for an American to 
serve his community, to be able to come to the Capitol of this great 
land and serve in the House of Representatives. It is something I had 
never, ever contemplated growing up. It is something I never had 
thought about. But it has been a tremendous education and a tremendous 
opportunity to serve. It has been a tremendous opportunity to meet some 
really good people.
  You know, I have heard from the polls that the Congress has a rating 
of like 13 percent. That may be a little high. It may be lower than 
that. I heard somebody say that our rating was so low that it is just 
basically family and staff, and then after we cut the staff's health 
care, that it probably was just down to family. Fortunately, I have a 
large family.
  But I have mentioned to members of this committee--and those who are 
probably watching tonight have seen members of the committee that have 
talked about this bill that we have been working on, and I hope that 
they have felt of their strength, of their commitment, of their desire 
to do the things that their constituents sent them here to do.
  I told members of the committee recently that if people at home could 
sit in on the markup, if they could sit in on some of the discussions 
that members of the committee have had, I think our ratings would 
probably be much higher, because these things that we grapple with 
aren't easy. They are not simple ``yes'' and ``no'' answers to the 
things that we deal with.
  For instance, I know many of us a couple of years ago voted for the 
Budget Control Act, which brought us sequestration. It also kept the 
government open, because that was one of the parts of the vote. If we 
had voted against it, the government would have been shut down. I think 
it was a bad choice that we had to make, but I was assured that 
sequestration would never happen. Well, we found out it happened, and 
it is causing us a lot of problems with our national defense.
  You know, the beauty of being able to serve on this committee is we 
get to serve with men and women who really sacrifice much. The men and 
women and their families sacrifice much to look out for our interests 
both at home and abroad, and I want to thank them.
  I want to thank all of the members of the committee. I want to thank 
all of our staff for the tremendous work that they do. They spent hours 
last night just going through these amendments, and they have been 
there constantly. They are all people of great expertise and great 
understanding of the issues that we face.
  With that, Mr. Chairman, I would like to ask all of my colleagues to 
follow this debate closely and support this bill as we come to final 
passage.
  With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mrs. MILLER of Michigan. Mr. Chair, earlier this year, President 
Obama released his 2015 budget proposal that makes another attempt to 
eliminate the entire A-10 fleet, which is the most effective weapons 
system used to protect our combat forces on the ground. I know how 
effective the A-10s have been in support of our troops because the 
107th Fighter Squadron of the Michigan Air National Guard fly A-10s out 
of Selfridge Air National Guard Base in my district.
  This is not the first time that the Administration has attempted to 
eliminate the A-10s from the inventory. In 2012, the defense budget 
submitted by the Administration also included a proposal to retire 
several A10 units, particularly those flown by the Air Guard, without 
an acceptable alternative to provide the critical ground support 
mission. That proposal was beaten back by those of us who realize the 
value of the Warthog and, more importantly, by those who rely on its 
protection.
  Two weeks ago, when testifying before the Senate Armed Services 
Committee, U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno told members 
of the committee that our ground troops ``believe'' in the A-10 
``Warthog'' and have confidence in its ability, above any other 
aircraft, to protect them in combat.
  Throughout this debate, Members of the Senate and the House have 
reiterated their opposition to the proposed divestment by highlighting 
the cost efficiency of the A-10, which costs an estimated $17,000 per 
hour to operate compared to one of its proposed replacements, the B-1, 
which costs $54,000 per hour to fly, and most importantly, the support 
of those engaged in combat on the ground.
  I am very pleased that during the House Armed Services Committee 
markup of the bill we are considering today, a bipartisan majority of 
that committee reaffirmed the importance of these aircraft with the 
adoption of an amendment that will preserve the fleet through 2015.
  Our unwavering support for the A-10 is not based on a perceived 
reluctance to cut anything military, it is based on facts, the cost 
effective nature of these aircraft and the strong support of our 
soldiers who depend on the close air support provided by the Warthog.
  I hear it time and time again from our troops who have served in 
combat in defense of freedom as well as those that operate A-10s out of 
Selfridge. They all agree that it is the most dependable aircraft. They 
use words like ``proven, effective and reliable'' to describe it. They 
say that it is the only weapon system that can do what it does, and 
what it does, is protect them in combat.
  Our troops put their lives in harm's way for our liberty, and we need 
to make sure we do everything possible to protect them in battle. I

[[Page 8592]]

am glad that today a bi-partisan majority in the House agreed with me 
and so many across this nation about the importance of the A-10 to our 
national defense. It is my firm hope that the Senate will join us and 
pass similar protections as this process moves forward.
  Mr. McCAUL. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of H.R. 4435, the 2015 
National Defense Authorization Act. I especially want to thank Chairman 
McKeon for working with my staff and I to include section 1072 in his 
Manager Amendment.
  As we draw down our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, military 
equipment used in theater can be used to enhance border security at 
home, and in the process, save taxpayer dollars.
  Section 1072 modifies current law, last updated in 1996 before the 
creation of the Department of Homeland Security, which guides the 
transfer of excess military equipment to provide preference for 
``border security activities.''
  This change puts border security, and the Department of Homeland 
Security, on equal footing with the Department of Justice and the 
Office of National Drug Control Policy so the Department's border 
security components can readily tap into excess military equipment on a 
preferential basis.
  In the past, United States Customs and Border Protection has missed 
out on thousands of articles of DoD excess gear because the equipment 
is distributed on a first-come first-serve basis, notwithstanding 
statutory preference in under current law.
  Section 1072 will bring the law up to date and will allow the 
operators on the ground protecting our border to more effectively 
complete their mission.
  Again, I want to thank Chairman McKeon and the staff of the Armed 
Services Committee for working with me to include this important 
provision in this year's NDAA.
  Ms. BORDALLO. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of H.R. 4435, the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. The bill provides 
critical authorities to support our men and women in uniform.
  In particular, I appreciate the leadership of Readiness Chairman, Mr. 
Rob Wittman of Virginia, and the way we have worked together to address 
the readiness of our United States military. Our hearings this session 
have highlighted some serious challenges to readiness in the coming 
years if we do not solve the broader issue of sequestration, which I 
believe is achievable if we put everything on the table for discussion.
  The Readiness title of the bill recommends additional funds to 
address particular readiness shortfalls, such as Pacific Command's 
prepositioned munitions; corrosion control, prevention, and mitigation; 
Air Force training range improvements; depot-level maintenance; 
operational tempo; aviation readiness; and National Guard training, 
among other readiness priorities.
  Additionally, the bill addresses policy issues such as prepositioned 
stocks, crisis response elements, regionally aligned forces, ship 
homeport designations and overseas maintenance, readiness metrics, and 
the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region, including airlift and tanker 
capabilities in the Pacific.
  But as much as we do to enhance readiness by authorizing increased 
funding by some $1.6 billion in the areas mentioned earlier, I believe 
this bill goes too far in cutting the operation and maintenance 
accounts in order to find funding for items not requested in the 
President's Budget in other titles of the bill.
  The bill authorizes $164.3 billion in operations and maintenance 
funding, which is $1.4 billion below what the President's Budget 
requested. I am particularly concerned about the $2.5 billion in cuts 
from four areas: unobligated balances, civilian personnel, and 
contracts for facilities maintenance and for Other Services. The cuts 
in these areas far outstrip the $455 million targeted reductions 
adjudicated by the committee staff on a bipartisan basis after careful 
consideration of the services' operations and maintenance budgets.
  I am not a fan of using expensive contractors for functions that 
could, and should, have been performed by civilian personnel, 
contracting is a fact of life and we are nearing the end of 13 years of 
two wars where we were heavily dependent on contractor support for 
execution of those wars.
  The budget request had already reduced facility maintenance to 60-70% 
of the stated requirement in fiscal year 2015. A further reduction of 
$419 million in this bill means the military services would forego 
repairs and upgrades to airfield runways, taxiways, and aprons; and to 
mission-critical facilities and infrastructure such as electrical 
systems, heating and air conditioning systems, and roofs. It would mean 
delays in renovations, consolidations, conversions, and demolitions to 
more efficiently use space and reduce operations and maintenance costs; 
deferral of repairs and upgrades to alleviate life, health, and safety 
deficiencies, including fire protection systems upgrades. And it would 
mean postponement of repairs, replacements, or reconfigurations of 
gates and other installation security components.
  The $399 million cut to the Other Services account could impact the 
quality of life for servicemembers by reducing or eliminating food 
service, tuition assistance, general training, family support programs, 
library support, physical fitness services, laundry services, testing, 
general and employee training, professional credentialing for health 
professionals, and ROTC scholarships instructor pay and textbooks.
  Unlike the $1.4 billion in cuts to unobligated balances which are 
taken in an undistributed manner at the military service level, the 
cuts in facility maintenance and Other Services are levied in every 
budget sub-activity group. This means we have hit almost every 
readiness account in operations and maintenance, including maneuver 
units, force readiness operations, depot maintenance, base operations, 
combatant commander mission support, strategic mobility, prepositioned 
stocks, industrial preparedness, ROTC, specialized skill training, 
professional development education, training support, logistic support, 
ammunition management, service-wide communications, manpower 
management, and classified programs.
  Further, I would note that contracts for Other Services includes 
professional services the Pentagon purchases to research, compile, and 
publish the reports that this committee and others require each year, 
including the hundreds of new reports required in this bill alone!
  Because of hiring freezes, sequestration, furloughs, pay freezes, and 
legislative mandates, most Department of Defense components and defense 
agencies have been functioning at 80 percent of their authorized 
manpower for the past 2 to 3 years and were only starting to recover in 
this fiscal year. Along with the services contracts cuts, a $315 
million cut to civilian personnel funding in fiscal year 2015 makes a 
mockery of the Total Force Management concepts this committee adopted 
and endorsed just three years ago, as defense components have told me 
they could not shed people fast enough and would have to undertake 
arbitrary reductions in force without consideration of mission 
requirements.
  Compounding these cuts is the $2 billion military personnel-related 
funding hole the Department will have to fill resulting from other 
actions this committee is considering today. Those funds, most likely, 
will come out of the operations and maintenance accounts when the 
Department of Defense executes the fiscal year 2015 budget.
  At a time when only 50% of Air Force pilots have returned to 
appropriate training levels; when the Navy has been forced to propose 
Phased Modernization of cruisers and amphibious warships to extend 
their service life, when the Marine Corps is establishing crisis 
response task forces without programming the full funding needed to 
resource them, and when the Army has identified $1.7 billion in 
unfunded training needs, I believe it is unwise and extraordinarily 
risky to fund the readiness accounts at $1.4 billion below the 
President's budget request. These cuts essentially impose another level 
of sequestration on the operation and maintenance accounts.
  As noted in a Readiness hearing this year, our top priority should be 
to ensure that no soldier, sailor, airman, or marine ever enters a fair 
fight. Our subcommittee has highlighted and documented the operations 
and maintenance shortfalls for the past three years and it is our duty 
and responsibility to ensure our men and women who serve have the 
necessary resources to dominate in any operational environment.
  I am concerned that our bill does not address an issue that I and a 
number of other Members in the House of Representatives have concerns 
about regarding the transition of the Global Privately Owned Vehicle 
Contract (GPC) to a new contractor. The prior contractor performed well 
for the US government on the prior GPC contract. But a decision was 
made to change contractors to save some money, despite concerns being 
raised about the new contractor's ability to perform and questions 
about whether there were any real cost savings. I raised some of those 
concerns during a recent Military Personnel Subcommittee hearing, and 
my colleagues have also made inquiries regarding the contractor change.
  Guam receives a significant shipment of privately owned vehicles, and 
our service members rely on efficient and timely privately owned 
vehicle delivery to help integrate into their new units and to help 
their families cope with the difficulties associated with Permanent

[[Page 8593]]

Change in Station assignments. I ask that you work with me, along with 
others on the Committee who have expressed similar concerns, to closely 
monitor and provide greater oversight on the transition to the new 
contractor. The new contractor assumed responsibility on May 1, and I 
understand some facilities were still not fully operational at that 
time and the contractor's logistics IT network was not fully deployed. 
Unfortunately, it appears that many of our concerns regarding the new 
contractor's ability to perform may be coming into fruition.
  Going forward, I hope the Committee will monitor the transition and 
ensure that the best value decision was made with respect to this 
important contract and in support of our service members and their 
families.
  Finally, this bill continues a tradition of supporting the Department 
of Defense's efforts to support the Obama Administration's Asia-Pacific 
rebalance strategy. The bill fully funds military construction related 
to the realignment of Marines from Okinawa, Japan to Guam. The 
realignment is the most tangible aspect of the rebalance strategy and 
showing our commitment has a profoundly positive impact on the 
rebalance. Further, like the last several years, the bill eliminates 
restrictions on use of Government of Japan funds to support the 
realignment. Given the current budget constraints at the Department of 
Defense it is prudent that we free up Government of Japan direct 
contributions to support this endeavor.
  I am concerned that this bill cuts over $80 million requested in the 
President's Budget to support critical upgrades to civilian water and 
wastewater systems on Guam. I believe that these upgrades are needed to 
support a robust military presence on the island and are needed now. 
However, I appreciate that the bill does include language authorizing a 
$13 million civilian infrastructure project that was appropriated in 
Fiscal Year 2012. Specifically, the project is for the development of a 
cultural repository which is needed to meet federal standards for the 
preservation of artifacts that are discovered during military 
construction activities. This project was agreed to in the Programmatic 
Agreement signed several years ago by Governor Calvo and various 
federal entities. Authorizing funds for this project keeps the U.S. 
Government's commitment to the people of Guam.
  The bill also included an amendment adopted during full committee 
consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2015 that requires the Department of Defense and Department of State, 
working in coordination with other relevant federal agencies, to 
develop a clear strategy for the Asia-Pacific rebalance. I offered this 
amendment with Mr. Forbes of Virginia and Ms. Hanabusa of Hawaii. The 
provision outlines what the strategy should contain and is mirrored off 
Department of Defense East Asia Strategy Reviews from the 1990s. It is 
important that our allies clearly understand what the Asia-Pacific 
rebalance strategy is so that there are assurances about the United 
States' presence in this critical region of the world.
  Moreover, this provision would also require the National Security 
Council, working with the Office of Management and Budget, to use the 
strategy to develop an implementation plan for budget development. 
Another concern that has been articulated by a number of think tanks as 
well as allies in the region is about the commitment of the United 
States in putting real resources towards this rebalance strategy. It is 
important that the implementation plan give clear guidance to relevant 
agencies in what programs and projects they should fund to support the 
Asia-Pacific rebalance strategy. The rebalance to the Asia-Pacific is 
an important and wise strategic goal and the implementation plan should 
help to ensure that this effort lasts past any one Administration.
  Again, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 4435.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chair, I submit the following.

                                         House of Representatives,


                                 Committee on Foreign Affairs,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, House Armed Services Committee, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: I write to confirm our mutual 
     understanding regarding H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, which contains 
     substantial matter that falls within the Rule X legislative 
     jurisdiction of the Foreign Affairs Committee. I appreciate 
     the cooperation that allowed us to work out mutually 
     agreeable text on numerous matters prior to your markup.
       Based on that cooperation and our associated 
     understandings, the Foreign Affairs Committee will not seek a 
     sequential referral or object to floor consideration of the 
     bill text approved at your Committee markup. However, this 
     decision in no way diminishes or alters the jurisdictional 
     interests of the Foreign Affairs Committee in this bill, any 
     subsequent amendments, or similar legislation. I request your 
     support for the appointment of House Foreign Affairs 
     conferees during any House-Senate conference on this 
     legislation.
       Finally, I respectfully request that you include this 
     letter and your response in your committee report on the bill 
     and in the Congressional Record during consideration of H.R. 
     4435 on the House floor.
           Sincerely,
                                                  Edward R. Royce,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Armed Services,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Edward R. Royce,
     Chairman, Foreign Affairs Committee, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Foreign Affairs Committee has valid 
     jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this important 
     legislation, and I am most appreciative of your decision not 
     to request a referral in the interest of expediting 
     consideration of the bill. I agree that by foregoing a 
     sequential referral, the Foreign Affairs Committee is not 
     waiving its jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters 
     will be included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                     Committee on Agriculture,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: Thank you for the opportunity to 
     review the relevant provisions of the text of H.R. 4435, the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. The 
     Agriculture Committee has a valid claim to jurisdiction over 
     H.R. 4435.
       I recognize and appreciate your desire to bring this 
     legislation before the House in an expeditious manner and, 
     accordingly, I agree to discharge H.R. 4435 from further 
     consideration by the Committee on Agriculture. I do so with 
     the understanding that by discharging the bill, the Committee 
     on Agriculture does not waive any future jurisdictional claim 
     on this or similar matters. Further, the Committee on 
     Agriculture reserves the right to seek the appointment of 
     conferees, if it should become necessary.
       I ask that you insert a copy of our exchange of letters 
     into both the Congressional Record and the Committee Report 
     during consideration of this measure on the House floor.
       Thank you for your courtesy in this matter, and I look 
     forward to continued cooperation between our respective 
     committees.
           Sincerely,
                                                   Frank D. Lucas,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Armed Services,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Frank D. Lucas,
     Chairman, Agriculture Committee, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Agriculture Committee has a valid 
     jurisdictional claim to a provision in this important 
     legislation, and I am most appreciative of your decision not 
     to request a referral in the interest of expediting 
     consideration of the bill. I agree that by foregoing a 
     sequential referral, the Agriculture Committee is not waiving 
     its jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters will be 
     included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Ways and Means,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. McKeon: I am writing to you concerning H.R. 4435, 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. 
     This legislation contains a provision requiring a strategy to 
     prioritize U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific region that is 
     within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means.
       In order to expedite floor consideration of this important 
     legislation, the Committee will waive consideration of the 
     bill. The Committee takes this action only with the 
     understanding that the Committee's jurisdictional interests 
     over this and similar legislation are in no way diminished or 
     altered.
       The Committee also reserves the right to seek appointment 
     to any House-Senate conference on this legislation and 
     requests your support if such a request is made. Finally, I

[[Page 8594]]

     would appreciate your including this letter in the 
     Congressional Record during consideration of H.R. 4435 on the 
     House Floor. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
           Sincerely,
                                                        Dave Camp,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Armed Services,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Dave Camp,
     Chairman, Committee on Ways and Means, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Ways and Means has a 
     valid jurisdictional claim to a provision in this important 
     legislation, and I am most appreciative of your decision not 
     to request a referral in the interest of expediting 
     consideration of the bill. I agree that by foregoing a 
     sequential referral, the Committee on Ways and Means is not 
     waiving its jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters 
     will be included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                             Committee on Energy and Commerce,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: I write concerning H.R. 4435, 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
       While the bill was referred to your Committee exclusively, 
     there are several provisions that fall within the Rule X 
     jurisdiction of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. 
     However, so that it may proceed expeditiously to the House 
     floor for consideration, the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
     will not request a sequential referral on the bill.
       This is done with our mutual understanding that the 
     Committee on Energy and Commerce is not waiving any of its 
     jurisdiction, will not be prejudiced with respect to the 
     appointment of conferees or its jurisdictional prerogatives 
     on H.R. 4435 or similar legislation, and will be consulted 
     and involved as the bill or similar legislation moves 
     forward. The Committee on Energy and Commerce also reserves 
     the right to seek the appointment of conferees to any House-
     Senate conference involving this or similar legislation, and 
     requests your support for such a request.
       Finally, I would appreciate your response to this letter, 
     confirming this understanding, and ask that a copy of our 
     exchange of letters on this matter be included in the 
     Congressional Record during consideration of H.R. 4435 on the 
     House floor.
           Sincerely,
                                                       Fred Upton,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Armed Services,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Fred Upton,
     Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Energy and Commerce has 
     valid jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this 
     important legislation, and I am most appreciative of your 
     decision not to request a referral in the interest of 
     expediting consideration of the bill. I agree that by 
     foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on Energy and 
     Commerce is not waiving its jurisdiction. Further, this 
     exchange of letters will be included in the committee report 
     on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

         House of Representatives, Committee on Education and the 
           Workforce,
                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman Committee on Armed Services, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to confirm our mutual 
     understanding with respect to H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. Thank you for 
     consulting with the Committee on Education and the Workforce 
     with regard to H.R. 4435 on those matters within the 
     committee's jurisdiction.
       In the interest of expediting the House's consideration of 
     H.R. 4435, the Committee on Education and the Workforce will 
     forgo further consideration of this bill. However, I do so 
     only with the understanding this procedural route will not be 
     construed to prejudice my committee's jurisdictional interest 
     and prerogatives on this bill or any other similar 
     legislation and will not be considered as precedent for 
     consideration of matters of jurisdictional interest to my 
     committee in the future.
       I respectfully request your support for the appointment of 
     outside conferees from the Committee on Education and the 
     Workforce should this bill or a similar bill be considered in 
     a conference with the Senate. I also request you include our 
     exchange of letters on this matter in the Committee Report on 
     H.R. 4435 and in the Congressional Record during 
     consideration of this bill on the House floor. Thank you for 
     your attention to these matters.
           Sincerely,
                                                       John Kline,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Armed Services,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. John Kline,
     Chairman Committee on Education and the Workforce, 
         Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Education and the 
     Workforce has valid jurisdictional claims to certain 
     provisions in this important legislation, and I am most 
     appreciative of your decision not to request a referral in 
     the interest of expediting consideration of the bill. I agree 
     that by foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on 
     Education and the Workforce is not waiving its jurisdiction. 
     Further, this exchange of letters will be included in the 
     committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
                                                         Chairman.

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chair, I ask that the following exchange of letters 
be included as part of the Record during consideration of H.R. 4435:
                                        Permanent Select Committee


                                              on Intelligence,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of 
         Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: In recognition of the importance of 
     expediting the passage of H.R. 4435, the ``Fiscal Year 2015 
     National Defense Authorization Bill,'' the Permanent Select 
     Committee on Intelligence hereby waives further consideration 
     of the bill. The Committee has jurisdictional interests in 
     H.R. 4435, including intelligence and intelligence-related 
     authorizations and provisions contained in the bill.
       The Committee takes this action only with the understanding 
     that this procedural route should not be construed to 
     prejudice the House Permanent Select Committee on 
     Intelligence's jurisdictional interest over this bill or any 
     similar bill and will not be considered as precedent for 
     consideration of matters of jurisdictional interest to the 
     Committee in the future, including in connection with any 
     subsequent consideration of the bill by the House. In 
     addition, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence will 
     seek conferees on any provisions of the bill that are within 
     its jurisdiction during any House-Senate conference that may 
     be convened on this legislation.
       Finally, I would ask that you include a copy of our 
     exchange of letters on this matter in the Congressional 
     Record during the House debate on H.R. 4435. I appreciate the 
     constructive work between our committees on this matter and 
     thank you for your consideration.
           Sincerely,
                                                      Mike Rogers,
                                                         Chairman.
                                  ____
                                  
                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Mike Rogers,
     Chairman, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 
         Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Permanent Select Committee on 
     Intelligence has valid jurisdictional claims to certain 
     provisions in this important legislation, and I am most 
     appreciative of your decision not to request a referral in 
     the interest of expediting consideration of the bill. I agree 
     that by foregoing a sequential referral, the Permanent Select 
     Committee on Intelligence is not waiving its jurisdiction. 
     Further, this exchange of letters will be included in the 
     committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
                                                         Chairman.
                                  ____
                                  
                                         House of Representatives,


                               Committee on Homeland Security,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, House Committee on Armed Services, Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: I write to you regarding H.R. 4435, 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. 
     There are certain provisions of this legislation that fall 
     within the Rule X jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland 
     Security.
       In the interest of permitting the Committee on Armed 
     Services to proceed expeditiously to the House floor, I will 
     not seek a sequential referral of H.R. 4435. However, I

[[Page 8595]]

     do so only with the mutual understanding that the 
     jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland Security over 
     matters contained in this or similar legislation is in no way 
     diminished or altered. I further request that you urge the 
     Speaker to name Members of this Committee to any conference 
     committee that is named to consider such provisions.
       Finally, I request you include this letter and your 
     response into the committee report on H.R. 4435 and into the 
     Congressional Record. Thank you for your consideration.
           Sincerely,
                                                Michael T. McCaul,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Michael T. McCaul,
     Chairman, Committee on Homeland Security,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I am most appreciative of your support and interest in 
     this important legislation. Further, this exchange of letters 
     will be included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                               Committee on Veterans' Affairs,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: I write to confirm our mutual 
     understanding regarding H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. This legislation 
     contains subject matter within the jurisdiction of the House 
     Committee on Veterans' Affairs, however in order to expedite 
     floor consideration of this important legislation, the 
     Committee waives consideration of the bill.
       The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs takes this action 
     only with the understanding that the committee's 
     jurisdictional interests over this and similar legislation 
     are in no way diminished or altered.
       The committee also reserves the right to seek appointment 
     to any House-Senate conference on this legislation and 
     requests your support if such a request is made. Finally, I 
     would appreciate your including this letter in the 
     Congressional Record during consideration of H.R. 4435 on the 
     House Floor. Thank you for your attention to these matters.
       With warm personal regards, I am
           Sincerely,
                                                      Jeff Miller,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Jeff Miller,
     Chairman, Committee on Veterans' Affairs,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Veterans' Affairs has 
     valid jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this 
     important legislation, and I am most appreciative of your 
     decision not to request a referral in the interest of 
     expediting consideration of the bill. I agree that by 
     foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on Veterans' 
     Affairs is not waiving its jurisdiction. Further, this 
     exchange of letters will be included in the committee report 
     on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                   Committee on the Judiciary,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: I am writing to you concerning the 
     jurisdictional interest of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
     matters being considered in H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
       Our committee recognizes the importance of H.R. 4435 and 
     the need for the legislation to move expeditiously. 
     Therefore, while we have a valid claim to jurisdiction over 
     the bill, I do not intend to request a sequential referral. 
     This, of course, is conditional on our mutual understanding 
     that nothing in this legislation or my decision to forego a 
     sequential referral waives, reduces, or otherwise affects the 
     jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee, and that a copy of 
     this letter and your response acknowledging our 
     jurisdictional interest will be included in the Committee 
     Report and as part of the Congressional Record during 
     consideration of this bill by the House.
       The Judiciary Committee also asks that you support our 
     request to be conferees on the provisions over which we have 
     jurisdiction during any House-Senate conference.
       Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
           Sincerely,
                                                    Bob Goodlatte,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Bob Goodlatte,
     Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on the Judiciary has valid 
     jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this important 
     legislation, and I am most appreciative of your decision not 
     to request a referral in the interest of expediting 
     consideration of the bill. I agree that by foregoing a 
     sequential referral, the Committee on the Judiciary is not 
     waiving its jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters 
     will be included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                               Committee on Natural Resources,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: I write to confirm our mutual 
     understanding regarding H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. This legislation 
     contains subject matter within the jurisdiction of the 
     Committee on Natural Resources, including:
       Sec. 602. No fiscal year 2015 increase in basic pay for 
     general and flag officers
       Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and 
     special pay authorities
       Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial, 
     La Jolla, California
       Sec. 2861, Memorial to the victims of the shooting attack 
     at the Washington Navy Yard
       Sec. 2864, Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross 
     National Memorial in Riverside, California
       Sec. 2865, Renaming site of Dayton Aviation Heritage 
     National Historical Park, Ohio
       Sec. 2866, Manhattan Project National Historical Park
       Title 29, Subtitle A--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada
       Sec. 2911, Redesignation of Johnson Valley Off-Highway 
     Vehicle Recreation Area, California
       Sec. 2921, Elimination of termination date for public land 
     withdrawals and reservations under Military Lands Withdrawal 
     Act of 1999
       Title 29, Subtitle D--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, 
     California
       Title 29, Subtitle D--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico
       Sec. xxx, National security considerations for inclusion of 
     federal property on National Register of Historic Places or 
     designation as National Historic Landmark under the National 
     Historic Preservation Act
       To expedite floor consideration of this important 
     legislation, and because of the extensive cooperation shown 
     by you and your staff, the Committee will forego seeking a 
     sequential referral of the bill. The Natural Resources 
     Committee takes this action only with the understanding that 
     the Committee's jurisdictional interests over this and 
     similar legislation are in no way diminished or altered.
       The Committee also reserves the right to seek appointment 
     to any House-Senate conference on this legislation and 
     requests your support if such a request is made. Finally, I 
     would appreciate your including this letter in the 
     Congressional Record during consideration of H.R. 4435 on the 
     House Floor.
       Thank you for your attention to these matters.
           Sincerely,
                                                     Doc Hastings,
     Chairman.
                                  ____



                                  Committee on Armed Services,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Doc Hastings,
     Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Natural Resources has 
     valid jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this 
     important legislation, and I am most appreciative of your 
     decision not to request a referral in the interest of 
     expediting consideration of the bill. I agree that by 
     foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on Natural 
     Resources is not waiving its jurisdiction. Further, this 
     exchange of letters will be included in the committee report 
     on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
                                                         Chairman.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of language 
Representative Doug Lamborn offered when the Committee on Armed 
Services marked-up the National Defense Authorization Act.
  Like most Americans, I remain concerned about Iran's state 
sponsorship of terrorism, its

[[Page 8596]]

horrendous human rights record, its efforts to destabilize its 
neighbors, its pursuit of intercontinental ballistic missiles, and its 
threats against our ally, Israel, as well as the fates of American 
citizens detained by Iran. I remain extremely alarmed by Iran's pursuit 
of uranium enrichment and plutonium separation efforts. In spite of 
Iran's statements to the contrary, I am concerned that these materials 
are in fact part of a nuclear weapons program. The pursuit of nuclear 
materials under the proclamation of peaceful energy initiatives raises 
some serious concerns when coming from a country with a terrible human 
rights record and ties to terrorist groups. It is both a necessity and 
a priority that the United States ensure that Iran does not have a 
nuclear weapon.
  On November 24, 2013, Iran accepted the terms of an international 
proposal to temporarily halt further expansion of its nuclear program, 
in return for relief from economic sanctions. While this proposal would 
in theory limit Iran's nuclear enrichment program, it does nothing to 
prevent Iran from pursuing a warhead or nuclear delivery system for a 
nuclear weapon or curtailing other issues that are threats to U.S. 
security and the security of our allies. That is why I am supportive of 
Representative Lamborn's amendment. This amendment makes it crystal 
clear, that it is the intent of the United States Congress that the 
U.S. should only agree to a comprehensive agreement on Iran's nuclear 
program if Iran ceases uranium enrichment, ceases all of their nuclear, 
chemical, biological, chemical weapon programs, ballistic missile 
program, and ballistic launch site technology and Iran has ceased 
providing support for international terrorist.
  The United States government must use every tool possible to deter 
threats from Iran. Economic sanctions remain an important and necessary 
tool to deterring aggressive actions. Should the United States provide 
any relief from these Congressional mandated sanctions, it is 
imperative that Iran halt all activities that are threatening to our 
national interests. Mr. Lamborn's amendment is an important and 
appropriate addition to the National Defense Authorization Act, and I 
look forward to seeing it included in law.
  Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Mr. Chair, I would like to thank Chairman 
McKeon and the Members of the House Armed Services Committee for the 
Committee's work on the Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization 
Act. As the Chairman of the House Small Business Committee, I know very 
well that efforts of this magnitude take leadership, thoughtfulness and 
compromise. I support the final bill, and thank the Committee for 
continuing to make our Nation's security a top priority.
  I want to draw attention to a key priority that the Committee helped 
address this year. Earlier this year, the United States Navy offered to 
the Committee its ``unfunded priority'' request of additional EA-18G 
Growlers, an electronic attack aircraft. Specifically, the Navy Chief 
of Naval Operations (CNO) Admiral Jonathan Greenert testified that 
there is an emerging requirement for more electronic attack, and he 
asked for 22 Growlers. The Growler is the only aircraft that can 
provide the full spectrum electronic attack that are needed for future 
operations.
  In addition to a specific warfighting capability that the Growler 
provides, the men and women that work on the aircraft are part of 
America's aerospace industry that has undergone significant change over 
the last several decades. A vital part of this industry are the small 
businesses that have kept our military force on the cutting edge, armed 
with technologies and programs no other nation can match. The 
production of the Growler is no exception to this rule as there are 340 
small businesses that are located across 32 states, including in my 
home state of Missouri, which support the program.
  At a time when the small business sector is regaining its footing in 
the recovering economy, there should be a way to preserve the military 
industrial base. This bill supports that effort by adding 5 Growlers 
above the President's Budget Request and encouraging the Navy to keep 
the manufacturing line open. Closing the line would not only upend many 
small businesses that sustain the program, but would also lead to less 
competition and fewer innovative technology breakthroughs in tactical 
aviation. The Committee bill represents a good first step at meeting 
the dual needs of the Navy's requirements and the defense industrial 
base.
  As the Fiscal Year 2015 bills move through the process, I look 
forward to working with the Committee to meet the needs of the 
warfighter and to protect the small businesses interests in our Nation.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chair, I ask that the following exchange of letters 
be included as part of the Record during consideration of H.R. 4435:

         Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, 
           Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of 
         Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing to you concerning the bill 
     H.R. 4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2015. There are certain provisions in the legislation 
     which fall within the Rule X jurisdiction of the Committee on 
     Oversight and Government Reform.
       In the interest of permitting your committee to proceed 
     expeditiously to floor consideration of this important bill, 
     I am willing to waive this committee's right to sequential 
     referral. I do so with the understanding that by waiving 
     consideration of the bill the Committee on Oversight and 
     Government Reform does not waive any future jurisdictional 
     claim over the subject matters contained in the bill which 
     fall within its Rule X jurisdiction. I request that you urge 
     the Speaker to name members of this committee to any 
     conference committee which is named to consider such 
     provisions.
       Please place this letter into the committee report on H.R. 
     4435 and into the Congressional Record during consideration 
     of the measure on the House floor. Thank you for the 
     cooperative spirit in which you have worked regarding this 
     matter and others between our respective committees.
           Sincerely,
                                                     Darrell Issa,
                                                         Chairman.
                                  ____
                                  
                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Darrell Issa,
     Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House 
         of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Oversight and Government 
     Reform has valid jurisdictional claims to certain provisions 
     in this important legislation, and I am most appreciative of 
     your decision not to request a referral in the interest of 
     expediting consideration of the bill. I agree that by 
     foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on Oversight 
     and Government Reform is not waiving its jurisdiction. 
     Further, this exchange of letters will be included in the 
     committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
                                                         Chairman.
                                  ____
                                  
                                         House of Representatives,


                                  Committee on Small Business,

                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of 
         Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: I am writing to you concerning the 
     bill H.R. 4435, the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. There are 
     certain provisions in the legislation which fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the Committee on Small Business pursuant to 
     Rule X(q) of the House of Representatives.
       In the interest of permitting the Committee on Armed 
     Services to proceed expeditiously to floor consideration of 
     this important bill, I am willing to waive the right of the 
     Committee on Small Business to sequential referral. I do so 
     with the understanding that by waiving consideration of the 
     bill, the Committee on Small Business does not waive any 
     future jurisdictional claim over the subject matters 
     contained in the bill which fall within its Rule X(q) 
     jurisdiction, including future bills that the Committee on 
     Armed Services will consider. I request that you urge the 
     Speaker to appoint members of this Committee to any 
     conference committee which is named to consider such 
     provisions.
       Please place this letter into the committee report on H.R. 
     4435 and into the Congressional Record during consideration 
     of the measure on the House floor. Thank you for the 
     cooperative spirit in which you have worked regarding this 
     issue and others between our respective committees.
           Sincerely,
                                                       Sam Graves,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Sam Graves,
     Chairman, Committee on Small Business, House of 
         Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Small Business has valid 
     jurisdictional claims to certain provisions in this important 
     legislation, and I am most appreciative of your decision not 
     to request a referral in the interest of expediting 
     consideration of the bill. I agree that by foregoing a 
     sequential referral, the Committee on Small Business is not 
     waiving

[[Page 8597]]

     its jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters will be 
     included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

         Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, 
           Committee on Science, Space, and Technology,
                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of 
         Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. McKeon: I write to confirm our mutual 
     understanding regarding H.R. 4435, the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. This legislation 
     contains subject matter within the jurisdiction of the 
     Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. However, in 
     order to expedite jurisdiction of the Committee on Science, 
     Space, and Technology. However, in order to expedite floor 
     consideration of this important legislation, the committee 
     waives consideration of the bill.
       The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology takes this 
     action only with the understanding that the committee's 
     jurisdictional interests over this and similar legislation 
     are in no way diminished or altered.
       The committee also reserves the right to seek appointment 
     to any conference on this legislation and requests your 
     support if such a request is made. Finally, I would 
     appreciate your including this letter in the Congressional 
     Record during consideration of H.R. 4435 on the House Floor. 
     Thank you for your attention in these matters.
           Sincerely,

                                                  Lamar Smith,

                                   Chairman, Committee on Science,
     Space, and Technology.
                                  ____

                                      Committee on Armed Services,


                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, May 12, 2014.
     Hon. Lamar Smith,
     Chairman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House 
         of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Science, Space, and 
     Technology has valid jurisdictional claims to certain 
     provisions in this important legislation, and I am most 
     appreciative of your decision not to request a referral in 
     the interest of expediting consideration of the bill. I agree 
     that by foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on 
     Science, Space, and Technology is not waiving its 
     jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters will be 
     included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

         Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of 
           Representatives,
                                      Washington, DC, May 9, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of 
         Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman McKeon: I write concerning H.R. 4435, the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, as 
     amended. There are certain provisions in the legislation that 
     fall within the Rule X jurisdiction of the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
       However, in order to expedite this legislation for floor 
     consideration, the Committee will forgo action on this bill. 
     This, of course, is conditional on our mutual understanding 
     that forgoing consideration of the bill does not prejudice 
     the Committee with respect to the appointment of conferees or 
     to any future jurisdictional claim over the subject matters 
     contained in the bill or similar legislation that fall within 
     the Committee's Rule X jurisdiction. I request you urge the 
     Speaker to name members of the Committee to any conference 
     committee named to consider such provisions.
       Please place a copy of this letter and your response 
     acknowledging our jurisdictional interest into the committee 
     report on H.R. 4435 and into the Congressional Record during 
     consideration of the measure on the House floor.
           Sincerely,
                                                     Bill Shuster,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

            Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives,
                                     Washington, DC, May 21, 2014.
     Hon. Bill Shuster,
     Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 
         House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 
     4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015. I agree that the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure has valid jurisdictional claims to certain 
     provisions in this important legislation, and I am most 
     appreciative of your decision not to request a referral in 
     the interest of expediting consideration of the bill. I agree 
     that by foregoing a sequential referral, the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure is not waiving its 
     jurisdiction. Further, this exchange of letters will be 
     included in the committee report on the bill.
           Sincerely,
                                        Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
                                                         Chairman.
  Mr. CALVERT. Mr. Chair, today I was proud to vote to approve H.R. 
4435, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 
2015. The NDAA is the key mechanism to provide necessary authorities 
and funding for America's military.
  Even in an era of constrained taxpayer resources, it is essential 
that we find ways to ensure our military has the funding necessary to 
carry out its mission. The FY15 NDAA provides a responsible fiscal 
balance and prioritizes the critical tools our troops need to maintain 
and perform as the finest fighting force in the world. The bill also 
provides our warfighters, and their families, with the support and care 
that we have promised them.
  One area that was minimally addressed was the size and growth of the 
civilian workforce at the Department of Defense (DoD). The NDAA tasks 
GAO to assess DoD's headquarter reduction efforts, building off its 
previous work conducted for the committee on examining growth in DOD 
headquarters. However, I believe Congress must go a step further in 
addressing the growth of the civilian workforce, especially as we draw 
down our uniformed personnel. It is important to note that:
  From FY01 to FY14, the civilian staff has grown by 15 percent while 
total active military has declined by 4 percent;
  The ratio of civilian workers to uniformed personnel is the highest 
in recent history despite the draw down in Iraq and Afghanistan;
  There are currently 718,000 civilian personnel versus 1.3 million 
active duty, a ratio that is out of balance.
  This imbalance is why I introduced the Rebalance for an Effective 
Defense Uniform and Civilian Employees Act (REDUCE Act, H.R. 4257). The 
REDUCE Act would require the Department of Defense to make necessary 
reductions in a systematic manner without compromising our ability to 
maintain a strong national defense over the long term.
  The REDUCE Act would:
  Reduce our defense civilian workforce by 15 percent by FY 2020. This 
percentage was recommended by the Defense Business Board, a trusted, 
authoritative, and independent source of expertise.
  The Department of Defense civilian workforce would remain at or below 
this established cap of a 15 percent reduction for Fiscal Years 2021 
through 2025.
  The Department of Defense civilian Senior Executive Service career 
appointee workforce will be reduced to 1,000 by 2020 and remain at or 
below 1,000 employees for Fiscal Years 2021 through 2025.
  Provide the Secretary of Defense the authority to use voluntary 
separation incentive payments and voluntary early retirement payments 
in order to achieve the required reductions in personnel.
  Provide the Secretary of Defense the authority to assign greater 
weight to the performance factor, rather than other factors such as 
tenure, in a Reduction in Force.
  There is no doubt that our DoD civilian workers play a vital role in 
numerous positions including logistics, acquisition, personnel 
management, and more. The mission of the civilian workforce at DoD is 
to support our uniformed personnel and their missions around the world. 
However, as we draw down our uniformed personnel, it makes no sense to 
not make commensurate reductions to the civilian workforce--a practice 
that has occurred in previous drawdowns.
  As Members of Congress, we should not let parochial interests prevent 
us from doing what is right for the country. Simply stated, it is 
inconceivable, defies logic and tramples the lessons of experience that 
a federal civilian job, once created, must live on forever. If our 
uniformed services are being reduced because the wars are ending, then 
a significant portion of the civilian jobs created to support those 
warfighters should be eliminated--not become contractor positions. 
Those jobs must be eliminated and done so at the legislative mandate of 
the Congress and at the executive discretion of the Secretary of 
Defense.
  In closing, I would like to mention that this was the last NDAA 
brought to the House floor by my good friend and the Chairman of the 
Armed Services Committee, Rep. Buck McKeon (CA-25). I want to thank 
Chairman McKeon for all of the hard work and dedication he has 
demonstrated on behalf of our troops and their families throughout his 
service here in the House.
  Mr. CLAY. Mr. Chair, I would like to commend the House Armed Services 
Committee and its Chairman, Honorable Buck McKeon, and Ranking Member, 
Honorable Adam Smith, on passage of the FY15 Defense Authorization Bill 
today that includes funding for additional Navy EA-18G ``Growler'' 
aircraft, as well

[[Page 8598]]

as language to continue the EA-18G and F/A-18 E/F lines in my district 
in St. Louis, Missouri.
  The United States Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Greenert, has 
testified to Congress numerous times this year about the growing need 
to control the electromagnetic spectrum to support the war fighter. He 
and the Navy have requested 22 additional EA-18G ``Growler'' aircraft, 
as part of an unfunded requirement, to meet these expanding electronic 
attack requirements.
  I have a number of constituents that work on the EA-18G and F/A-18 
production lines in St. Louis. Without additional aircraft from 
Congress this year, this production line will shut down, and we as a 
nation will lose a national asset--including thousands of dedicated and 
talented workers who make up this defense industrial base.
  I look forward to working with my colleagues in the coming weeks, 
especially on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, to help 
address this clear Navy requirement. We need to support our war 
fighter, and the EA-18G ``Growler'' is vital to operating and 
prevailing in the important and growing airborne electronic attack 
environment.
  Mr. CONNOLLY. Mr. Chair, I want to thank the Chairman and the Ranking 
Member of the Armed Services Committee and their staffs for working 
with me on several amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2015, H.R. 4435.
  This legislation reaffirms our commitment to our men and women in 
uniform, ensuring they have the necessary tools to support our national 
defense. In addition to my amendments, which will help create savings 
and improve department management, the bill before the House preserves 
essential benefits that are important to the thousands of active and 
retired military personnel and their families living in my Northern 
Virginia district. It also sustains the critical collaboration with the 
private sector in my district which partners with the Department on a 
wide variety of defense priorities, including cybersecurity, logistics, 
and information technology services.
  With respect to federal investments in IT, I was pleased to co-author 
a comprehensive reform proposal with Chairman Issa of the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform. It is based on our bipartisan bill, 
known as the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act, or 
FITARA, which passed the House with unanimous support earlier this 
year. I also want to thank our Committee's Ranking Member, Mr. 
Cummings, for his generosity and leadership on these issues.
  In the 21st century, effective governance is inextricably linked with 
how well government leverages technology to serve its citizens. Yet our 
current laws governing Federal IT procurement are antiquated, 
cumbersome, and out of step with technological change.
  Our bipartisan FITARA amendment addresses this by comprehensively 
streamlining and strengthening the Federal IT acquisition process. 
FITARA recognizes that effective Federal IT procurement reform must 
begin with leadership and accountability. It enhances CIO authorities 
to ensure agency heads have talented leaders to serve as their primary 
advisers on IT management; to recruit and retain talented IT staff; and 
to oversee critical IT investments across the organization.
  FITARA also accelerates data center optimization and strengthens the 
accountability and transparency of Federal IT programs. If enacted, 80 
percent of the approximately $80 billion spent annually on Federal IT 
investment would be required to be posted on the online IT Dashboard 
for the public to review, compared to the 50 percent or less that is 
available today. Fortunately, a bipartisan consensus is forming around 
the urgent need to streamline and strengthen how the Federal Government 
acquires and deploys information technology. Now is the time to ensure 
IT reforms are adopted government-wide and given the force of law.
  I also was pleased to offer an amendment that will permanently 
authorize the use of simplified acquisition procedures for certain 
commercial items, which has the support of Department of Defense and 
other agencies, as well as industry partners, such as the Professional 
Services Council. This activity was originally authorized as a 3-year 
test program under the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996. The program aimed to 
simplify the contracting process by providing contracting officers with 
additional discretion and flexibility for the acquisition of commercial 
items not exceeding $5 million. Since being enacted, Congress has 
extended this authority eight separate times, and it is now set to 
expire on January 1, 2015.
  Earlier this year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 
submitted a report to Congress, discussing the use of the test 
authority by the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and 
Interior. GAO found that the test program reduced contracting lead time 
and administrative burdens with manageable risks. In responding to the 
GAO report, DHS and DOI both stated that the temporary nature of the 
test program hindered its use and recommended the authority be made 
permanent.
  The Department of Defense offered the following comments in support 
of preserving this authority: ``The test program provides benefits in 
terms of reducing lead time and administrative workload and enables 
faster delivery of much needed supplies and equipment to the 
Warfighter. For example, the U.S. Army Contracting Command Rock Island 
Contracting Center, which provides reach-back support to the theater, 
used this authority to execute several contract requirements in direct 
support
of the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) theater of operations in 
FY 2011. Without this authority, the procurement lead time would have 
doubled. This could have led to mission failure in contingency 
operations, particularly those in the CENTCOM theater of operations. In 
addition, this authority is extremely beneficial in responding to 
domestic crises such as Hurricane Katrina, Midwest flooding, and recent 
tornados.''
  In addition, I offered an amendment to extend for five years a 
successful hiring authority to allow Federal retirees to be temporarily 
re-hired on a part-time basis to fill critical skills gaps, mentor and 
train younger workers, and stave off a ``brain drain'' as more and more 
Federal employees become eligible to retire. First adopted as part of 
the NDAA for FY2010, this authority allows the heads of federal 
agencies to bring back a limited number of Federal retirees for a 
limited time without them incurring a penalty on the annuity.
  Over the past five years, agency leaders report this has been a 
valuable tool in providing them with flexibility to address staffing 
needs as retirements have begun to increase. Nearly half of the 
management staff within some agencies is eligible to retire today, and 
agencies face further challenges as positions are being left vacant due 
to budget shortfalls and hiring freezes. Thanks to this re-hiring 
authority, agencies are able to bring back experienced staff to bridge 
knowledge gaps and help prepare future leaders. This program is limited 
in scope so as not to supplant the urgent need to hire and train new 
federal workers. I was pleased to have the support of the National 
Active and Retired Federal Employees Association and the Government 
Management Coalition, which called this a ``good-government 
initiative.''
  I also worked with the Armed Services Committee on two foreign 
affairs-related amendments. The first is a bipartisan amendment that I 
was pleased to introduce with my fellow co-chairs of the Congressional 
Taiwan Caucus Reps. Diaz-Balart (FL), Sires (NJ), and Carter (TX). Our 
amendment directs the President to sell F-16 C/D aircraft to Taiwan to 
modernize its aging air fleet. It is consistent with U.S. obligations 
to provide weapons for Taiwan's defense under the 1979 Taiwan Relations 
Act.
  The Obama administration said two years ago that it would ``seriously 
consider'' selling the newer fighter jets to Taiwan. During the 112th 
Congress, 181 Members of the House sent a letter to the Administration 
urging it to ``move quickly'' to address Taiwan's critical need. Yet 
since then, it has only sold retrofit packages for Taiwan's older 
fighter models, some of which are decades old. Taiwan is a key 
strategic ally in the Pacific. It is America's 9th largest trading 
partner. Our amendment is critical to America's strategic economic and 
defense partnerships with Taiwan, and it reinforces our commitment to 
support a democratic Taiwan given the growing military gap and cyber 
security threat across the Taiwan Strait.
  The other amendment builds on language already in the bill, the limit 
military contact and cooperation with the Russian Federation in the 
wake of its annexation of Crimea and its ongoing role in stoking unrest 
within eastern Ukraine. The bill already limits activity and funding 
under the Department of Defense and the National Security 
Administration with respect to Russia, including the purchase of 
Russian-made helicopters for the Afghanistan Security Force. My 
amendment would also prevent the integration of Russian missile systems 
into the missile defense systems of the United States if such 
integration undermines the security of the U.S. or NATO. It mirrors a 
similar prohibition already in the bill relating to the integration of 
Chinese missile defense systems.
  The situation in Ukraine continues to deteriorate. We are witnessing 
open and armed clashes in the streets and pro-Russian militants are 
usurping the authority of local governments. Russia's repeated attempts 
to undermine the sovereign governments of former Soviet Republics by 
stoking the discontent of

[[Page 8599]]

ethnic minorities now constitutes Russia's modus operandi on foreign 
subterfuge. For countries seeking to shed authoritarian institutions, 
Western economic prosperity and democratic freedoms can be like a moth 
to flame. Cold War era geopolitics dictated that the endgame for the 
USSR was to extinguish that flame. In the post-Cold War era, Russia has 
its sights set on the moth. The President already has leveled sanctions 
against Russian political leaders and banks, and further economic 
sanctions are possible. To further pressure Russia to cease this 
aggression action and to reverse course, the U.S. and its allies should 
seek to limit all collaboration with the Russian Federation until and 
unless it withdraws troops from Crimea and Ukraine's eastern border.
  Again, I thank the Chairman and the Ranking Member for working with 
me on these amendments. I am grateful for their inclusion in the final 
bill, and I urge my colleagues to support final passage.
  Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. Chair, I rise today in reluctant opposition to 
H.R. 4435, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
  For the last 53 years, Congress has passed--and the President has 
signed into law--the annual Defense Authorization bill, allowing us to 
provide the critical resources the Armed Forces need to maintain the 
best military in the world. The NDAA has also allowed Congress to have 
an open dialogue about many of the difficult choices with which we are 
confronted, including the significant financial constraints that our 
military is operating under. While I appreciate the House Armed 
Services Committee's continued support of our servicemembers and our 
national defense, I have serious concerns with a number of misguided 
provisions in this year's NDAA.
  This year's authorization bill authorizes $513.4 billion in budget 
authority, including $495.8 billion for the Department of Defense and 
$79.4 billion in overseas contingency operations (OCO). Unfortunately, 
it rejects many cost saving measures recommended by the Pentagon and 
would eliminate more than $50 billion in potential savings for our 
military over the next five years.
  Of particular concern, H.R. 4435 prioritizes unrequested weapons 
systems and parochial interests over our military readiness. It slashes 
military readiness by $1.2 billion from the President's FY15 request 
despite the fact that Secretary Hagel has consistently warned that if 
cuts to our military readiness persist, and we were confronted with an 
emerging threat, ``the United States may not have enough ready forces 
to respond.''
  This year's NDAA also includes a provision to continue funding 
restrictions on the construction or modification of detention 
facilities in the United States to house Guantanamo detainees. I was 
particularly disappointed that an amendment offered by Ranking Member 
Smith to provide a framework for closure of Guantanamo by the end of 
2016 was rejected. As the President made clear in his State of the 
Union Address earlier this year, we cannot wait any longer to close 
down this facility.
  I also share many of the other concerns that were outlined in the 
President's Statement of Administration Policy. This includes language 
that restricts the Pentagon from retiring the A-10 aircraft and a 
provision that authorizes $20 million in unrequested funding in FY15 
for the planning and design of a missile field on the East Coast. I 
also oppose sections 314, 315, 316, and 317, which would prohibit the 
Department of Defense from using alternative fuels and would limit the 
ability of our military from developing alternative energy sources that 
have the potential to save money and enhance our energy security.
  Despite my opposition to the overall legislation, I was pleased that 
a bipartisan amendment offered by Representative Patrick Murphy and 
Representative Mick Mulvaney to address the migration of base budget 
funding into the OCO budget was adopted. We have worked together to 
ensure that the OCO budget is no longer used as a mechanism to 
circumvent budget caps. I am also encouraged that this bill builds on a 
number of provisions passed in last year's NDAA and continues to 
address the problem of sexual assault in the military. In particular, 
it would eliminate the so-called ``good soldier defense'' in court-
martial proceedings, prohibiting a soldier from using good military 
character as a defense in a sexual assault case. These proceedings 
should be based on the specific evidence presented in the case.
  This bill does authorize much needed funding for our men and women in 
uniform but ultimately it ignores the current budget landscape that our 
military is facing. We have to budget based on reality, instead of 
writing a blank check and holding onto as ``much of the stuff and the 
training as possible'' and hoping that ``some miracle happens and we 
get money next year that we don't have now,'' as Chairman McKeon put it 
earlier this month. As a result of this line of thinking, this 
legislation avoids making many tough choices at the expense of our 
military readiness. It is my hope that many of my objections to this 
legislation will be resolved in Conference with the Senate and that I 
will be able to support its final passage.
  Mrs. WAGNER. Mr. Chair, I would like to thank Chairman McKeon and the 
Members of the House Armed Services Committee for the Committee's work 
on the Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Act. I support 
the final bill; it is crafted thoughtfully and carefully to reflect the 
needs of the warfighter while enjoying bipartisan support from this 
body. Its passage is a testament to the Committee's leadership and hard 
work to support our men and women in uniform.
  I am particularly thankful for the support of the United States 
Navy's ``unfunded priority'' request of additional EA-18G Growlers. 
Early in the budget cycle, following the release of the 
Administration's Department of Defense budget, the Navy Chief of Naval 
Operations (CNO) Admiral Jonathan Greenert testified that there is a 
growing demand for electronic attack capabilities. Specifically, he 
requested 22 additional EA-18G Growlers above the President's Budget 
request to meet that demand.
  The EA-18G Growler provides the Navy and all Department of Defense 
forces with the ability to control the entire electromagnetic spectrum, 
the only aircraft in the entire inventory with that capability. With 
warfare increasingly operating within the cyber, information and 
electronic domains, there is increasing importance in not just 
understanding, but dominating the electromagnetic spectrum. For this 
reason, CNO Greenert testified why he believes that the Growler is 
essential to the warfighter. From the Committee's work, we also 
understand that the Navy is undertaking further analysis this year to 
determine the final requirement for the airborne electronic attack 
(AEA) capability.
  Without additional aircraft, the EA-18G Growler manufacturing line is 
likely to be shuttered before the Navy can fulfill its requirements for 
additional electronic attack. If this scenario is allowed to occur, the 
Department of Defense would also lose its ability to produce F/A-18E/F 
Super Hornet strike fighters, which are manufactured alongside the 
Growler in the same production line. Such a loss would affect our 
Nation's ability to surge strike fighters, meet increasing demand in 
electronic warfare, and provide competition in tactical aviation. The 
Growler program has been a model defense acquisition program, meeting 
all of its cost targets and delivering ahead of the Navy's schedule 
deadlines. Moreover, the F/A-18 and EA-18G production lines support 
60,000 jobs, including 13,000 jobs in my home state of Missouri.
  I am pleased that the Committee included support for 5 EA-18G 
Growlers above the President's Budget Request. While this overall 
increase will not meet the Navy's total unfunded priority, it 
demonstrates the Committee's position that the Growler is an essential 
resource that our Nation requires. Further, the Committee urged the 
Navy to take steps to keep the manufacturing line solvent until the 
Department can meet the basic needs of the warfighter in electronic 
attack. I will continue my work with the House Appropriations Committee 
to ensure that the Navy receives a sufficient number of Growlers to 
meet its emerging requirements and keep the manufacturing line open 
throughout Fiscal Year 2015.
  My voice is not alone in trying to support the Navy's unfunded 
priority for additional Growlers. The request has strong support across 
Congress, as evidenced by a letter circulated earlier in the year that 
collected 109 House signatures in support of the Growler. This is a 
strong showing for any program, and one that received significant 
bipartisan validation. That letter is attached at the conclusion of my 
remarks.
  In closing, the Nation faces many challenges as we send our sons and 
daughters into harm's way to defend our freedom and liberty. The 
Committee's bill is always a statement about its judgment on how best 
to serve those warfighters. I am glad that they have made EA-18G 
Growlers a high priority, and I look forward to working with them over 
the course of Fiscal Year 2015.
  Additionally, I have included a support letter for the EA-18G Growler 
that I authored with Representative Lacy Clay that is signed by 109 
Members of Congress.


[[Page 8600]]




                                Congress of the United States,

                                   Washington, DC, April 11, 2014.
     Hon. Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
     Chairman, House Armed Services Committee, Washington, DC.
     Hon. Adam Smith,
     Ranking Member, House Armed Services Committee, Washington, 
         DC.
     Hon. Rodney Frelinghuysen,
     Chairman, House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, 
         Washington, DC.
     Hon. Peter Visclosky,
     Ranking Member, House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, 
         Washington, DC.
       Gentlemen: It has come to our attention the Fiscal Year 
     2015 Budget Request of the President does not include funding 
     for the United States Navy F/A-18 program, which includes the 
     EA-18G Growler. If accepted by Congress, the result would be 
     the premature end to this critical production line.
       As you know, the EA-18G Growler is the Nation's only full 
     spectrum airborne electronic attack (AEA) and protection 
     aircraft. It provides this capability not just for the Navy 
     but for joint forces as well. Deploying from both Navy 
     aircraft carriers and joint force land bases, it is 
     recognized as a key DoD element for our Nation's warfighting 
     capability. As the Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jonathan 
     Greenert has stated, control of the electromagnetic spectrum 
     is critical to the warfighting mission today and in the 
     future.
       Analysis demonstrates that additional Growlers would 
     increase operational mission effectiveness more than any 
     component of the Navy's carrier air wing, now and in the 
     future. Recognizing this, the Navy has submitted an `unfunded 
     priority' for 22 additional Growlers. The Growler is the only 
     DoD option for electronic attack, and limited capacity 
     significantly impacts mission effectiveness against current 
     and future threats.
       The Navy and other joint warfighters will not have the 
     opportunity to fulfill an emerging requirement, however, if 
     the F/A-18 production line is not funded in the Fiscal Year 
     2015 budget. Without additional aircraft, a shutdown decision 
     will need to be made this year. To avoid this, last year 
     Congress added $75 million in Advanced Procurement thuds for 
     the F/A-18 in the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense 
     Authorization Act (NDAA) and the Defense Appropriations Act, 
     Fiscal Year 2014--enough for 22 aircraft.
       Another critical consideration is the Nation's defense 
     industrial base for tactical aviation. Today, there are 
     multiple providers for tactical aviation, sophisticated 
     tactical radars, and strike fighter engines. With the end of 
     the F/A-18 production, however, DoD will be left with only a 
     single manufacturer in each one of these areas. This scenario 
     limits warfighting surge capacity, eliminates competition 
     that drives innovation and cost control, and imperils future 
     development programs. Moreover, the F/A-18 program supports 
     American manufacturing, including 60,000 jobs, 800 different 
     suppliers and vendors, and provides $3 billion in annual 
     economic impact.
       We ask you to support the Navy's unfunded priority of 22 
     additional EA-18G Growlers as you consider the Fiscal Year 
     2015 defense bills. If Congress does not support further 
     Growler production, we will lose the only full spectrum 
     electronic warfare aircraft production line.
       Thank you very much for your attention to this request.
           Sincerely,
       Ann Wagner; Blaine Luetkemeyer; Pat Meehan; Rodney Davis; 
     Wm. Lacy Clay; Cheri Bustos; William L. Enyart; Robert R. 
     Brady; Doug Lamborn; Paul Cook; Frank A. LoBiondo; Jason T. 
     Smith; Joseph R. Pitts; Chris Collins.
       Niki Tsongas; Carol Shea-Porter; Corrine Brown; Gerald E. 
     Connolly; Emanuel Cleaver; Matt Cartwright; Sam Graves; Adam 
     Kinzinger; Billy Long; Bill Posey; Gregg Harper; Leonard 
     Lance; Tony Cardenas; Sheila Jackson Lee.
       Grace F. Napolitano; Allyson Y. Schwartz; Grace Meng; 
     Bennie G. Thompson; Richard L. Hanna; Steve Chabot; Peter T. 
     King; David W. Jolly; Devin Nunes; Keith J. Rothfus; Michelle 
     Lujan Grisham; Louise McIntosh Slaughter; Marcia L. Fudge; 
     David Loebsack.
       Daniel Lipinski; Ann M. Kuster; George Holding; Michael K. 
     Simpson; David G. Reichert; Michele Bachmann; David G. 
     Valadao; Steve Stivers; John F. Tierney; Alan S. Lowenthal; 
     Rosa L. DeLauro; Rick Larsen; Bill Pascrell, Jr.; Robin L. 
     Kelly.
       Gary G. Miller; Rob Bishop; Tom Rice; Michael G. 
     Fitzpatrick; John J. Duncan, Jr.; Cory Gardner; Sanford D. 
     Bishop, Jr.; Colleen W. Hanabusa; Derek Kilmer; Sean Patrick 
     Maloney; Timothy H. Bishop; Steve Israel.
       Jim Bridenstine; Stevan Pearce; Jon Runyan; Scott R. 
     Tipton; Gus M. Bilirakis; Mike Rogers; John C. Carney, Jr.; 
     Daniel B. Maffei; Suzan K. DelBene; Tulsi Gabbard; Ann 
     Kirkpatrick, G.K. Butterfield.

                              {time}  2030

  The Acting CHAIR. All time for general debate has expired.
  Pursuant to the rule, the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the 5-minute rule.
  In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Committee on Armed Services, printed in the bill, an amendment in 
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee 
print 113-44 is adopted.
  The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill for 
the purpose of further amendment under the 5-minute rule and shall be 
considered as read.
  The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:

                               H.R. 4435

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Howard P. 
     `Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2015''.
       (b) References.--Any reference in this or any other Act to 
     the ``National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015'' shall be deemed to refer to the ``Howard P. `Buck' 
     McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2015''.

     SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF 
                   CONTENTS.

       (a) Divisions.--This Act is organized into four divisions 
     as follows:
       (1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations.
       (2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations.
       (3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security 
     Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
       (4) Division D--Funding Tables.
       (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act 
     is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.

            DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

                          TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 101. Authorization of Appropriations.

                       Subtitle B--Army Programs

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne 
              reconnaissance low aircraft.
Sec. 112. Plan on modernization of UH-60A aircraft of Army National 
              Guard.

                       Subtitle C--Navy Programs

Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for Tomahawk block IV 
              missiles.
Sec. 122. Construction of San Antonio class amphibious ship.
Sec. 123. Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility 
              acquisition program of the United States Special 
              Operations Command.
Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for moored training ship 
              program.
Sec. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for mission modules for 
              Littoral Combat Ship.
Sec. 126. Extension of limitation on availability of funds for Littoral 
              Combat Ship.

                     Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

Sec. 131.  Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics 
              modernization program for C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 132. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A-10 
              aircraft.
Sec. 133. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of U-2 
              aircraft.
Sec. 134. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment or 
              transfer of KC-10 aircraft.
Sec. 135. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment of E-3 
              airborne warning and control system aircraft.

       Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

Sec. 141. Comptroller General report on F-35 aircraft acquisition 
              program.

         TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 201. Authorization of Appropriations.

    Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 211. Preliminary design review of presidential aircraft 
              recapitalization program.
Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for armored multi-purpose 
              vehicle program.
Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for unmanned carrier-
              launched airborne surveillance and strike system.
Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne 
              reconnaissance systems.
Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for weather satellite 
              follow-on system.
Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared 
              systems space data exploitation.
Sec. 217. Limitation on availability of funds for hosted payload and 
              wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared 
              systems.

[[Page 8601]]

Sec. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for protected tactical 
              demonstration and protected military satellite 
              communications testbed of the advanced extremely high 
              frequency program.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 221. Revision to the service requirement under the Science, 
              Mathematics, and Research for Transformation Defense 
              Education Program.
Sec. 222. Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain 
              defense research facility records.
Sec. 223. Modification to cost-sharing requirement for pilot program to 
              include technology protection features during research 
              and development of certain defense systems.

                  TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.

                   Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

Sec. 311. Elimination of fiscal year limitation on prohibition of 
              payment of fines and penalties from the Environmental 
              Restoration Account, Defense.
Sec. 312. Biannual certification by commanders of the combatant 
              commands relating to the prohibition on the disposal of 
              waste in open-air burn pits.
Sec. 313. Exclusions from definition of ``chemical substance'' under 
              Toxic Substances Control Act and report on lead 
              ammunition.
Sec. 314. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel 
              procurement requirement.
Sec. 315. Congressional notice of bulk purchase of alternative fuels 
              for operational use.
Sec. 316. Limitation on procurement of biofuels.
Sec. 317. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of 
              biofuels refineries.

                 Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

Sec. 321. Additional requirement for strategic policy on prepositioning 
              of materiel and equipment.
Sec. 322. Comptroller General reports on Department of Defense 
              prepositioning strategic policy and plan for 
              prepositioned stocks.
Sec. 323. Pilot program on provision of logistic support for the 
              conveyance of excess defense articles to allied forces.

                          Subtitle D--Reports

Sec. 331. Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation 
              and financial support for military museums.
Sec. 332. Report on enduring requirements and activities currently 
              funded through amounts authorized to be appropriated for 
              overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 333. Army assessment of the regionally aligned force.
Sec. 334. Report on impacts of funding reductions on military 
              readiness.

          Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

Sec. 341. Limitation on authority to enter into a contract for the 
              sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 
              engine.

                       Subtitle F--Other Matters

Sec. 351. Clarification of authority relating to provision of 
              installation-support services through intergovernmental 
              support agreements.
Sec. 352. Sense of Congress on access to training ranges within United 
              States Pacific Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 353. Management of conventional ammunition inventory.

              TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

                       Subtitle A--Active Forces

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum 
              levels.

                       Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the 
              reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2015 limitation on number of non-dual status 
              technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on 
              active duty for operational support.

              Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 421. Military personnel.

                   TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

             Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

Sec. 501. Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by 
              selective retirement boards to particular warrant officer 
              year groups and specialties.
Sec. 502. Relief from limits on percentage of officers who may be 
              recommended for discharge during a fiscal year using 
              enhanced authority for selective early discharges.
Sec. 503. Repeal of requirement for submission to Congress of annual 
              reports on joint officer management and promotion policy 
              objectives for joint officers.
Sec. 504. Options for Phase II of joint professional military 
              education.
Sec. 505. Limitation on number of enlisted aides authorized for 
              officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.
Sec. 506. Required consideration of certain elements of command climate 
              in performance appraisals of commanding officers.

           Subtitle B--Reserve Component Personnel Management

Sec. 511. Retention on the reserve active-status list following 
              nonselection for promotion of certain health professions 
              officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior 
              grade) pursuing baccalaureate degrees.
Sec. 512. Chief of the National Guard Bureau role in assignment of 
              Directors and Deputy Directors of the Army and Air 
              National Guards.
Sec. 513. National Guard civil and defense support activities and 
              related matters.

                Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

Sec. 521. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel 
              decisions relating to correction of military records.
Sec. 522. Additional required elements of Transition Assistance 
              Program.
Sec. 523. Extension of authority to conduct career flexibility 
              programs.
Sec. 524. Provision of information to members of the Armed Forces on 
              privacy rights relating to receipt of mental health 
              services.
Sec. 525. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to 
              close a prayer outside of a religious service according 
              to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises 
              of the endorsing faith group.
Sec. 526. Department of Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism.
Sec. 527. Removal of artificial barriers to the service of women in the 
              Armed Forces.

  Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic 
                    Violence Prevention and Response

Sec. 531. Improved Department of Defense information reporting and 
              collection of domestic violence incidents involving 
              members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 532. Additional duty for judicial proceedings panel regarding use 
              of mental health records by defense during preliminary 
              hearing and court-martial proceedings.
Sec. 533. Applicability of sexual assault prevention and response and 
              related military justice enhancements to military service 
              academies.
Sec. 534. Consultation with victims of sexual assault regarding 
              victims' preference for prosecution of offense by court-
              martial or civilian court.
Sec. 535. Enforcement of crime victims' rights related to protections 
              afforded by certain Military Rules of Evidence.
Sec. 536. Minimum confinement period required for conviction of certain 
              sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed 
              Forces.
Sec. 537. Modification of Military Rules of Evidence relating to 
              admissibility of general military character toward 
              probability of innocence.
Sec. 538. Confidential review of characterization of terms of discharge 
              of members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual 
              offenses.
Sec. 539. Consistent application of rules of privilege afforded under 
              the Military Rules of Evidence.

                 Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

Sec. 545. Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to 
              transitional compensation for dependents of members 
              separated for dependent abuse.
Sec. 546. Improved consistency in data collection and reporting in 
              Armed Forces suicide prevention efforts.
Sec. 547. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are 
              members of the Armed Forces.

            Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities

Sec. 551. Authorized duration of foreign and cultural exchange 
              activities at military service academies.
Sec. 552. Pilot program to assist members of the Armed Forces in 
              obtaining post-service employment.

               Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

Sec. 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational 
              agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed 
              Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.

[[Page 8602]]

Sec. 562. Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in 
              Department of Defense overseas dependents' school system.
Sec. 563. Expansion of functions of the Advisory Council on Dependents' 
              Education to include domestic dependent elementary and 
              secondary schools.
Sec. 564. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and 
              transition of military dependent students.
Sec. 565. Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012.

                   Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

Sec. 571. Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees 
              of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded 
              in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist 
              organization.
Sec. 572. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge.
Sec. 573. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to 
              Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael 
              Peralta.

            Subtitle I--Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements

Sec. 581. Secretary of Defense review and report on prevention of 
              suicide among members of United States Special Operations 
              Forces.
Sec. 582. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of 
              separation of members of the Armed Forces who made 
              unrestricted reports of sexual assault.
Sec. 583. Comptroller General report regarding management of personnel 
              records of members of the National Guard.
Sec. 584. Study on gender integration in defense operation planning and 
              execution.
Sec. 585. Deadline for submission of report containing results of 
              review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal 
              Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.

                       Subtitle J--Other Matters

Sec. 591. Inspection of outpatient residential facilities occupied by 
              recovering service members.
Sec. 592. Working Group on Integrated Disability Evaluation System.
Sec. 593. Sense of Congress regarding fulfilling promise to leave no 
              member of the Armed Forces unaccounted in Afghanistan.

          TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

                     Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates 
              of basic allowance for housing under certain 
              circumstances.
Sec. 602. No fiscal year 2015 increase in basic pay for general and 
              flag officers.

           Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay 
              authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay 
              authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for 
              nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 
              consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus 
              authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of 
              other title 37 bonuses and special pays.

                 Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation

Sec. 621. Authority to enter into contracts for the provision of 
              relocation services.

    Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 
                        Benefits and Operations

Sec. 631. Authority of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to enter 
              into contracts with other Federal agencies and 
              instrumentalities to provide and obtain certain goods and 
              services.
Sec. 632. Review of management, food, and pricing options for defense 
              commissary system.
Sec. 633. Restriction on implementing any new Department of Defense 
              policy to limit, restrict, or ban the sale of certain 
              items on military installations.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 641. Anonymous survey of members of the Armed Forces regarding 
              their preferences for military pay and benefits.

                   TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

           Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits

Sec. 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 702. Clarification of provision of food to former members and 
              dependents not receiving inpatient care in military 
              medical treatment facilities.

                 Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

Sec. 711. Cooperative health care agreements between the military 
              departments and non-military health care entities.
Sec. 712. Surveys on continued viability of TRICARE Standard and 
              TRICARE Extra.
Sec. 713. Limitation on transfer or elimination of graduate medical 
              education billets.
Sec. 714. Review of military health system modernization study.

                 Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters

Sec. 721. Extension of authority for joint Department of Defense-
              Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility 
              Demonstration Fund.
Sec. 722. Designation and responsibilities of senior medical advisor 
              for Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 723. Research regarding Alzheimer's disease.
Sec. 724. Acquisition strategy for health care professional staffing 
              services.
Sec. 725. Pilot program on medication therapy management under TRICARE 
              program.
Sec. 726. Report on reduction of Prime Service Areas.
Sec. 727. Comptroller General report on transition of care for post-
              traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury.
Sec. 728. Briefing on hospitals in arrears in payments to Department of 
              Defense.

  TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED 
                                MATTERS

Subtitle A--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, 
                            and Limitations

Sec. 801. Extension to United States Transportation Command of 
              authorities relating to prohibition on contracting with 
              the enemy.
Sec. 802. Extension of contract authority for advanced component 
              development or prototype units.
Sec. 803. Amendment relating to authority of the Defense Advanced 
              Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype 
              projects.
Sec. 804. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available 
              for contract services.

                  Subtitle B--Industrial Base Matters

Sec. 811. Three-year extension of and amendments to test program for 
              negotiation of comprehensive small business 
              subcontracting plans.
Sec. 812. Improving opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned 
              small businesses.
Sec. 813. Plan for improving data on bundled and consolidated 
              contracts.
Sec. 814. Authority to provide education to small businesses on certain 
              requirements of Arms Export Control Act.
Sec. 815. Prohibition on reverse auctions for covered contracts.
Sec. 816. SBA surety bond guarantee.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 821. Certification of effectiveness for Air Force information 
              technology contracting.
Sec. 822. Airlift service.
Sec. 823. Compliance with requirements for senior Department of Defense 
              officials seeking employment with defense contractors.
Sec. 824. Procurement of personal protective equipment.
Sec. 825. Prohibition on funds for contracts violating Executive Order 
              No. 11246.
Sec. 826. Requirement for policies and standard checklist in 
              procurement of services.

      TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

              Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department 
              of the Navy and Marine Corps.
Sec. 902. Additional responsibility for Director of Operational Test 
              and Evaluation.
Sec. 903. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and 
              Environment.
Sec. 904. Requirement for congressional briefing before divesting of 
              Defense Finance and Accounting Service functions.
Sec. 905. Combatant command efficiency plan.
Sec. 906. Requirement for plan to reduce geographic combatant commands 
              to four by fiscal year 2020.
Sec. 907. Office of Net Assessment.
Sec. 908. Amendments relating to organization and management of the 
              Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 909. Periodic review of Department of Defense management 
              headquarters.

                   Subtitle B--Total Force Management

Sec. 911. Modifications to biennial strategic workforce plan relating 
              to senior management, functional, and technical workforce 
              of the Department of Defense.

[[Page 8603]]

Sec. 912. Repeal of extension of Comptroller General report on 
              inventory.
Sec. 913. Assignment of certain new requirements based on 
              determinations of cost-efficiency.
Sec. 914. Prohibition on conversion of functions performed by civilian 
              or contractor personnel to performance by military 
              personnel.
Sec. 915. Notification of compliance with section relating to 
              procurement of services.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 921. Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of 
              activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of 
              Defense regional centers for security studies.
Sec. 922. Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense 
              and Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine 
              Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis while 
              performing official travel.
Sec. 923. Single standard mileage reimbursement rate for privately 
              owned automobiles of Government employees and members of 
              the uniformed services.

                      TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                     Subtitle A--Financial Matters

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Repeal of limitation on Inspector General audits of certain 
              financial statements.
Sec. 1003. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security 
              Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization 
              and naval reactors.
Sec. 1004. Management of Defense information technology systems.

                  Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counterdrug and 
              counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Three-year extension of authority of Department of Defense 
              to provide additional support for counterdrug activities 
              of other governmental agencies.
Sec. 1013. Submittal of biannual reports on use of funds in the drug 
              interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide 
              account on the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 
              of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations 
              of the Senate.
Sec. 1014. National Guard drug interdiction and counter-drug 
              activities.
Sec. 1015.  Sense of Congress on Mexico and Central America.

                Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Sec. 1021. Definition of combatant and support vessel for purposes of 
              the annual plan and certification relating to budgeting 
              for construction of naval vessels.
Sec. 1022. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.
Sec. 1023. Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval 
              flight officer be in command of an inactivated nuclear-
              powered aircraft carrier before decommissioning.
Sec. 1024. Limitation on expenditure of funds until commencement of 
              planning of refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. 
              George Washington.
Sec. 1025. Sense of Congress recognizing the anniversary of the sinking 
              of U.S.S. Thresher.
Sec. 1026. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of 
              Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.

                      Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

Sec. 1031. Extension of authority to make rewards for combating 
              terrorism.
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify 
              facilities in the United States to house detainees 
              transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 
              Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1033. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release 
              of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, 
              Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

         Subtitle E--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

Sec. 1041. Modification of Department of Defense authority for 
              humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled 
              conventional munitions assistance programs.
Sec. 1042. Authority to accept voluntary services of law students and 
              persons studying to be paralegals.
Sec. 1043. Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the 
              Department of Defense reimbursement rate for 
              transportation services provided to certain non-
              Department of Defense entities.
Sec. 1044. Repeal of authority relating to use of military 
              installations by civil reserve air fleet contractors.
Sec. 1045. Certification and limitation on availability of funds for 
              aviation foreign internal defense program.
Sec. 1046. Submittal of procedures and report relating to sensitive 
              military operations.
Sec. 1047. Limitation on use of Russian-flagged airlift aircraft to 
              support the airlift movement requirements of the United 
              States Transportation Command.
Sec. 1048. Prohibition on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air 
              Force Base until completion of assessments by Secretary 
              of Defense and Government Accountability Office.
Sec. 1049. Limitation on removal of C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 1050. Conditions on Army National Guard and active Army force 
              structure changes pending Comptroller General report.

                    Subtitle F--Studies and Reports

Sec. 1061. Protection of defense mission-critical infrastructure from 
              electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems.
Sec. 1062. Response of the Department of Defense to compromises of 
              classified information.
Sec. 1063. Report and briefing to Congress on procurement and 
              inspection of armored commercial passenger-carrying 
              vehicles to transport civilian employees of the 
              Department of Defense.
Sec. 1064. Study on joint analytic capability of the Department of 
              Defense.

                       Subtitle G--Other Matters

Sec. 1071. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1072. Sale or donation of excess personal property for border 
              security activities.
Sec. 1073. Revision to statute of limitations for aviation insurance 
              claims.
Sec. 1074. Pilot program for the human terrain system.
Sec. 1075. Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace.
Sec. 1076. Sense of Congress on the life and achievements of Dr. James 
              R. Schlesinger.
Sec. 1077. Reform of quadrennial defense review.
Sec. 1078. Resubmission of 2014 quadrennial defense review.
Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress regarding counter-improvised explosive 
              devices.
Sec. 1080. Enhancing presence and capabilities and readiness posture of 
              United States military in Europe.
Sec. 1081. Determination and disclosure of transportation costs 
              incurred by the Secretary of Defense for congressional 
              trips outside the United States.

                  TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation 
              on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for 
              Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant 
              allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on 
              official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1103. Revision to list of Science and Technology Reinvention 
              Laboratories.
Sec. 1104. Permanent authority for experimental personnel program for 
              scientific and technical personnel.
Sec. 1105. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of 
              Defense research and engineering facilities.
Sec. 1106. Judicial review of Merit Systems Protection Board decisions 
              relating to whistleblowers.

             TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

                  Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

Sec. 1201. One-year extension of Global Security Contingency Fund.
Sec. 1202. Notice to Congress on certain assistance under authority to 
              conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign 
              countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of 
              mass destruction.
Sec. 1203. Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign 
              military liaison officers of foreign countries while 
              assigned to the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1204. Annual report on human rights vetting and verification 
              procedures of the Department of Defense.

        Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan

Sec. 1211. Extension of Commanders' Emergency Response Program in 
              Afghanistan.
Sec. 1212. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain 
              coalition nations for support provided to United States 
              military operations.
Sec. 1213. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign 
              forces supporting or participating with the United States 
              Armed Forces.
Sec. 1214. Report on progress toward security and stability in 
              Afghanistan under Operation Resolute Support.

[[Page 8604]]

Sec. 1215. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to 
              Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 150 percent of all 
              taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are 
              not reimbursed by Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National 
              Security Forces through the end of fiscal year 2018.
Sec. 1217. Sense of Congress on United States military commitment to 
              Operation Resolute Support in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1218. Extension of Afghan special immigrant program.

         Subtitle C--Matters Relating to the Russian Federation

Sec. 1221. Limitation on military contact and cooperation between the 
              United States and the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1222. Limitation on use of funds with respect to certification of 
              certain flights by the Russian Federation under the 
              Treaty on Open Skies.
Sec. 1223. Limitations on providing certain missile defense information 
              to the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds to transfer missile 
              defense information to the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1225. Report on non-compliance by the Russian Federation of its 
              obligations under the INF Treaty.
Sec. 1226. Sense of Congress regarding Russian aggression toward 
              Ukraine.
Sec. 1227. Annual report on military and security developments 
              involving the Russian Federation.

        Subtitle D--Matters Relating to the Asia-Pacific Region

Sec. 1231. Strategy to prioritize United States interests in the United 
              States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility and 
              implementation plan.
Sec. 1232. Modifications to annual report on military and security 
              developments involving the People's Republic of China.
Sec. 1233. Report on goals and objectives guiding military engagement 
              with Burma.
Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for 
              United States Pacific Command.
Sec. 1235. Missile defense cooperation.
Sec. 1236. Maritime capabilities of Taiwan and its contribution to 
              regional peace and stability.
Sec. 1237. Independent assessment on countering anti-access and area-
              denial strategies and capabilities in the Asia-Pacific 
              region.
Sec. 1238. Sense of Congress reaffirming security commitment to Japan.
Sec. 1239. Sense of Congress on opportunities to strengthen 
              relationship between the United States and the Republic 
              of Korea.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 1241. Extension of authority for support of special operations to 
              combat terrorism.
Sec. 1242. One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional 
              assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1243. Extension and modification of authority to support 
              operations and activities of the Office of Security 
              Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1244. Modification of national security planning guidance to deny 
              safe havens to al-Qaeda and its violent extremist 
              affiliates.
Sec. 1245. Enhanced authority to acquire goods and services of Djibouti 
              in support of Department of Defense activities in United 
              States Africa Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 1246. Strategic framework for United States security force 
              assistance and cooperation in the European and Eurasian 
              regions.
Sec. 1247. Requirement of Department of Defense to continue 
              implementation of United States Strategy to Prevent and 
              Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and 
              participation in Interagency Working Group.
Sec. 1248. Department of Defense situational awareness of economic and 
              financial activity.
Sec. 1249. Treatment of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the 
              Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and 
              Nationality Act.
Sec. 1250. Prohibition on integration of certain missile defense 
              systems.

          Subtitle F--Reports and Sense of Congress Provisions

Sec. 1261. Report on ``New Normal'' and general mission requirements of 
              United States Africa Command.
Sec. 1262. Report on contractors with the Department of Defense that 
              have conducted significant transactions with Iranian 
              persons or the Government of Iran.
Sec. 1263. Reports on nuclear program of Iran.
Sec. 1264. Sense of Congress on United States presence and cooperation 
              in the Arabian Gulf region to deter Iran.
Sec. 1265. Sense of Congress on modernization of defense capabilities 
              of Poland.

                TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs and 
              Funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding Allocations.
Sec. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat 
              Reduction activities with Russian Federation.

                    TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

                     Subtitle A--Military Programs

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program.

                 Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

Sec. 1411. Revisions to previously authorized disposals from the 
              National Defense Stockpile.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of 
              Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility 
              Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health 
              Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement 
              Home.

   TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS 
                         CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1504. Military personnel.
Sec. 1505. Other appropriations.

                     Subtitle B--Financial Matters

Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority.

          Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters

Sec. 1521. Continuation of existing limitations on the use of funds in 
              the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1522. Use of and transfer of funds from Joint Improvised Explosive 
              Device Defeat Fund.

     TITLE XVI--STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, CYBER, AND INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

                      Subtitle A--Space Activities

Sec. 1601. Department of Defense Space Security and Defense Program.
Sec. 1602. Evolved expendable launch vehicle notification.
Sec. 1603. Satellite communications responsibilities of Executive Agent 
              for Space.
Sec. 1604. Liquid rocket engine development program.
Sec. 1605.  Pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite 
              communication services.

  Subtitle B--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

Sec. 1611. Assessment and limitation on availability of funds for 
              intelligence activities and programs of United States 
              Special Operations Command and special operations forces.
Sec. 1612. Annual briefing on the intelligence, surveillance, and 
              reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands.
Sec. 1613. One-year extension of report on imagery intelligence and 
              geospatial information support provided to regional 
              organizations and security alliances.
Sec. 1614. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive 
              Agent.
Sec. 1615. Air Force intelligence organization.
Sec. 1616. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation.

                 Subtitle C--Cyberspace-Related Matters

Sec. 1621. Executive agent for cyber test and training ranges.

                       Subtitle D--Nuclear Forces

Sec. 1631. Preparation of annual budget request regarding nuclear 
              weapons.
Sec. 1632. Independent review of the personnel reliability program of 
              the Department of Defense and the human reliability 
              program of the Department of Energy.
Sec. 1633. Assessment of nuclear weapon secondary requirement.
Sec. 1634. Retention of missile silos.
Sec. 1635. Certification on nuclear force structure.

                  Subtitle E--Missile Defense Programs

Sec. 1641. Theater air and missile defense of allies of the United 
              States.
Sec. 1642. Sense of Congress on procurement and deployment of 
              capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle.

   TITLE XVII--DEFENSE AUDIT ADVISORY PANEL ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                              AUDITABILITY

Sec. 1701. Findings and purposes.
Sec. 1702. Establishment of Advisory Panel on Department of Defense 
              Audit Readiness.
Sec. 1703. Duties of the Advisory Panel.
Sec. 1704. Powers of the Advisory Panel.

[[Page 8605]]

Sec. 1705. Advisory Panel personnel matters.
Sec. 1706. Termination of the Advisory Panel.

            DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be 
              specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.

                 TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2004 project.
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2013 projects.
Sec. 2106. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 
              project.
Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 
              projects.

                 TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2012 projects.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2014 project.
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 
              projects.
Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 
              projects.

              TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition 
              projects.
Sec. 2302. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2008 project.
Sec. 2304. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 
              project.
Sec. 2305. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 
              projects.

           TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

               Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2404. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 
              projects.
Sec. 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 
              projects.
Sec. 2406. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain 
              fiscal year 2015 projects pending submission of required 
              reports.

          Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization 
              construction, defense-wide.
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2000 project.

   TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT 
                                PROGRAM

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.

            TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

 Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition 
              projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
              construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.

                       Subtitle B--Other Matters

Sec. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain 
              fiscal year 2012 projects.
Sec. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2013 project.
Sec. 2613. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 
              project.

          TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and 
              closure activities funded through Department of Defense 
              base closure account.

            Subtitle B--Prohibition on Additional BRAC Round

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and 
              Closure (BRAC) round.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 2721. Force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory and 
              assessment of infrastructure necessary to support the 
              force structure.
Sec. 2722. Modification of property disposal procedures under base 
              realignment and closure process.
Sec. 2723. Final settlement of claims regarding caretaker agreement for 
              former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah.

         TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

 Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 
                                Changes

Sec. 2801. Prevention of circumvention of military construction laws.
Sec. 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor 
              military construction.
Sec. 2803. Use of one-step turn-key contractor selection procedures for 
              additional facility projects.
Sec. 2804. Extension of limitation on construction projects in European 
              Command area of responsibility.

        Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

Sec. 2811. Consultation requirement in connection with Department of 
              Defense major land acquisitions.
Sec. 2812. Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial 
              institutions operating on military installations.
Sec. 2813. Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority.
Sec. 2814. Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses 
              relating to certain real property transactions.
Sec. 2815. Special easement acquisition authority, Pacific Missile 
              Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii.
Sec. 2816. National security considerations for inclusion of Federal 
              property on National Register of Historic Places or 
              designation as National Historic Landmark under the 
              National Historic Preservation Act.

  Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

Sec. 2831. Repeal or modification of certain restrictions on 
              realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific 
              Region.

                      Subtitle D--Land Conveyances

Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial, La Jolla, 
              California.
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, former Walter Reed Army Hospital, District 
              of Columbia.
Sec. 2843. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. 
              Merrill and Lake Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
Sec. 2845. Modification of conditions on land conveyance, Joliet Army 
              Ammunition Plant, Illinois.
Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, Robert H. Dietz Army Reserve Center, 
              Kingston, New York.
Sec. 2847. Exercise of reversionary interest, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma.
Sec. 2848. Land conveyance, Hanford Site, Washington.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 2861. Memorial to the victims of the shooting attack at the 
              Washington Navy Yard.
Sec. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security 
              Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 
              Security Studies.
Sec. 2863. Redesignation of Pohakuloa Training Area in Hawaii as 
              Pohakuloa Training Center.
Sec. 2864. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial 
              in Riverside, California.
Sec. 2865. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National 
              Historical Park, Ohio.
Sec. 2866. Manhattan Project National Historical Park.

    TITLE XXIX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT 
                         READINESS AND SECURITY

              Subtitle A--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

Sec. 2901. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station 
              Fallon, Nevada.
Sec. 2902. Water rights.
Sec. 2903. Withdrawal.

[[Page 8606]]

  Subtitle B--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, 
                               California

Sec. 2911. Redesignation of Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle 
              Recreation Area, California.

    Subtitle C--Bureau of Land Management Withdrawn Military Lands 
                         Efficiency and Savings

Sec. 2921. Elimination of termination date for public land withdrawals 
              and reservations under Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 
              1999.

      Subtitle D--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air 
              Weapons Station China Lake, California.

           Subtitle E--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

Sec. 2941. Additional withdrawal and reservation of public land to 
              support White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico.

 DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND 
                          OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

      TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

         Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other Defense Activities.
Sec. 3104. Energy Security and Assurance.

   Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 3111. Design and use of prototypes of nuclear weapons for 
              intelligence purposes.
Sec. 3112. Authorized personnel levels of National Nuclear Security 
              Administration.
Sec. 3113. Cost containment for Uranium Capabilities Replacement 
              Project.
Sec. 3114. Plutonium pit production capacity.
Sec. 3115. Definition of baseline and threshold for stockpile life 
              extension project.
Sec. 3116. Production of nuclear warhead for long-range standoff 
              weapon.
Sec. 3117. Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium.
Sec. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the 
              Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3119. Additional limitation on availability of funds for Office of 
              the Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3120. Limitation on availability of funds for nonproliferation 
              activities between the United States and the Russian 
              Federation.
Sec. 3121. Limitation on availability of funds for defense nuclear 
              nonproliferation activities at sites in the Russian 
              Federation.

                     Subtitle C--Plans and Reports

Sec. 3131. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear 
              Security Administration.
Sec. 3132. Analysis and report on W88 Alt 370 program high explosives 
              options.
Sec. 3133. Analysis of existing facilities.

                       Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 3141. Technical corrections to Atomic Energy Defense Act.
Sec. 3142. Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security 
              Administration Act.

          TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Sec. 3202. Inspector General of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
              Board.
Sec. 3203. Number of employees of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
              Board.

                 TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.

                  TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security 
              aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2015.
Sec. 3502. Special rule for DD-17.
Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress on the role of domestic maritime industry 
              in national security.

                       DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.

                         TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

Sec. 4101. Procurement.

        TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.

                 TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.

                     TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

Sec. 4401. Military personnel.

                    TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.

                   TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 4601. Military construction.

      TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.

     SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.

       In this Act, the term ``congressional defense committees'' 
     has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of 
     title 10, United States Code.

            DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

                          TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the 
     Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4101.

                       Subtitle B--Army Programs

     SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIRBORNE 
                   RECONNAISSANCE LOW AIRCRAFT.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for aircraft 
     procurement, Army, for the modernization of the 
     communications intelligence subsystem of airborne 
     reconnaissance low aircraft may be obligated or expended 
     until the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional 
     defense committees a report that--
       (1) specifies which such subsystem will be used to 
     modernize such aircraft;
       (2) explains how such subsystem was selected;
       (3) identifies the alternatives to such subsystem that the 
     Secretary considered during such selection; and
       (4) details how such subsystem will be integrated into the 
     signals intelligence modernization plan of the Army.

     SEC. 112. PLAN ON MODERNIZATION OF UH-60A AIRCRAFT OF ARMY 
                   NATIONAL GUARD.

       (a) Plan.--Not later than March 15, 2015, the Secretary of 
     the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
     a prioritized plan for modernizing the entire fleet of UH-60A 
     aircraft of the Army National Guard.
       (b) Additional Elements.--The plan under subsection (a) 
     shall set forth the following:
       (1) A detailed timeline for the modernization of the entire 
     fleet of UH-60A aircraft of the Army National Guard.
       (2) The number of UH-60L, UH-60L Digital, and UH-60M 
     aircraft that the Army National Guard will possess upon 
     completion of such modernization plan.
       (3) The cost, by year, associated with such modernization 
     plan.

                       Subtitle C--Navy Programs

     SEC. 121. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR TOMAHAWK BLOCK 
                   IV MISSILES.

       (a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to section 2306b of title 10, 
     United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into 
     one or more multiyear contracts for a period of not more than 
     five years, beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year, 
     for the procurement of Tomahawk block IV missiles.
       (2) Submission of written certification by secretary of 
     defense.--For purposes of carrying out subsection (i)(1) of 
     such section 2306b with respect to a contract entered into 
     under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall substitute ``the 
     date that is 45 days before the date on which the Secretary 
     enters into a contract under section 121 of the Howard P. 
     `Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2015'' for ``March 1 of the year in which the Secretary 
     requests legislative authority to enter into such contract''.
       (b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract 
     entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any 
     obligation of the United States to make a payment under the 
     contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is subject 
     to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for 
     such later fiscal year.

     SEC. 122. CONSTRUCTION OF SAN ANTONIO CLASS AMPHIBIOUS SHIP.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a 
     contract beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year for 
     the procurement of one San Antonio class amphibious ship. The 
     Secretary may employ incremental funding for such 
     procurement.
       (b) Condition on Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract 
     entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any 
     obligation of the United States to make a payment under such 
     contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is 
     subject to the availability of appropriations for that 
     purpose for such fiscal year.

     SEC. 123. ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UNDERSEA 
                   MOBILITY ACQUISITION PROGRAM OF THE UNITED 
                   STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.

       (a) Limitation on Milestone B Decision.--The Commander of 
     the United States Special Operations Command may not make any 
     Milestone B acquisition decisions with respect to a covered 
     element unless--
       (1) the Commander has submitted to the congressional 
     defense committees the transition plan under subsection 
     (b)(2);
       (2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
     Technology, and Logistics has submitted to such committees 
     the certification under subsection (c)(1); and
       (3) the Secretary of the Navy has completed the review 
     under subsection (d)(1).
       (b) Transition Plan.--
       (1) In general.--The Commander shall develop a transition 
     plan for undersea mobility capabilities that includes the 
     following:
       (A) A description of the current capabilities provided by 
     covered elements as of the date of the plan.

[[Page 8607]]

       (B) An identification and description of the requirements 
     of the Commander for future undersea mobility platforms.
       (C) An identification of resources necessary to fulfill the 
     requirements identified in subparagraph (B).
       (D) A description of the technology readiness levels of any 
     covered element currently under development as of the date of 
     the plan.
       (E) An identification of any potential gaps or projected 
     shortfall in capability, along with steps to mitigate any 
     such gap or shortfall.
       (F) Any other matters the Commander determines appropriate.
       (2) Submission.--The Commander shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees the transition plan under 
     paragraph (1).
       (c) Certification.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (2), the 
     Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 
     Logistics shall certify an acquisition strategy for covered 
     elements developed by the Commander if such strategy--
       (A) is based on reasonable cost and schedule estimates to 
     execute the product development and production plan;
       (B) the technology in the program has been demonstrated in 
     a relevant environment; and
       (C) the program complies with all relevant policies, 
     regulations, and directives of the Secretary of Defense.
       (2) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
     certification requirement in paragraph (1) if the Secretary--
       (A) determines that such certification is not in the 
     interests of the United States; and
       (B) notifies the congressional defense committees of such 
     determination, including justifications for making the 
     waiver.
       (d) Review.--The Secretary of the Navy shall--
       (1) review the transition plan under subsection (b)(1) and 
     the acquisition strategy described in subsection (c)(1); and
       (2) ensure that the development of requirements for the 
     Navy and the acquisition plans of the Navy take into account 
     such transition plan and acquisition strategy.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``covered element'' means any of the following 
     elements of the undersea mobility acquisition program of the 
     United States Special Operations Command:
       (A) The dry combat submersible-light program.
       (B) The dry combat submersible-medium program.
       (C) The next-generation submarine shelter program.
       (D) Any new dry combat submersible developed under the 
     undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States 
     Special Operations Command after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act.
       (2) The term ``Milestone B approval'' has the meaning given 
     that term in section 2366(e) of title 10, United States Code.
       (f) Conforming Repeal.--Section 144 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1325) is repealed.

     SEC. 124. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MOORED 
                   TRAINING SHIP PROGRAM.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for 
     shipbuilding and construction, Navy, for design, conversion, 
     modification, or construction relating to the moored training 
     ship program of the Navy, not more than 80 percent may be 
     obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed 
     following the date on which the Secretary of Defense 
     certifies to the congressional defense committees that--
       (1) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 
     Council has reviewed and approved the need for two additional 
     moored training ships;
       (2) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation 
     has reviewed and certified the cost estimates of the moored 
     training ship program; and
       (3) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
     Technology, and Logistics has reviewed and approved the 
     budget, schedule, and construction plans for such two 
     additional moored training ships.

     SEC. 125. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MISSION 
                   MODULES FOR LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the 
     procurement of additional mission modules for the Littoral 
     Combat Ship program may be obligated or expended until the 
     Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense 
     committees each of the following:
       (1) The Milestone B program goals for cost, schedule, and 
     performance for each increment.
       (2) Certification by the Director of Operational Test and 
     Evaluation with respect to the total number for each module 
     type that is required to perform all necessary operational 
     testing.

     SEC. 126. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS 
                   FOR LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.

       Section 124(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 693) is 
     amended by striking ``this Act or otherwise made available 
     for fiscal year 2014'' and inserting ``this Act, the Howard 
     P. `Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2015, or otherwise made available for fiscal 
     years 2014 or 2015''.

                     Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

     SEC. 131. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF 
                   AVIONICS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C-130 
                   AIRCRAFT.

       (a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to--
       (1) take any action to cancel or modify the avionics 
     modernization program of record for C-130 aircraft; or
       (2) initiate an alternative communication, navigation, 
     surveillance, and air traffic management program for C-130 
     aircraft that is designed or intended to replace the avionics 
     modernization program described in paragraph (1).
       (b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary 
     of the Air Force, not more than 75 percent may be obligated 
     or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following 
     the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to 
     the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has 
     obligated the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal years prior to fiscal 
     year 2015 for the avionics modernization program of record 
     for C-130 aircraft.

     SEC. 132. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT 
                   OF A-10 AIRCRAFT.

       (a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be 
     obligated or expended to retire A-10 aircraft.
       (b) Comptroller General Study.--
       (1) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States 
     shall conduct a study evaluating the platforms of the Air 
     Force used, as of the date of the study, to conduct close air 
     support missions.
       (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a report on the study 
     under paragraph (1), including--
       (A) the cost per airframe carrying out the close air 
     support missions described in such paragraph;
       (B) the capabilities of each platform evaluated under such 
     study; and
       (C) a determination by the Comptroller General with respect 
     to whether such airframes other than A-10 aircraft are able 
     to successfully carry out such close air support missions.

     SEC. 133. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT 
                   OF U-2 AIRCRAFT.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make 
     significant changes to retire, prepare to retire, or place in 
     storage U-2 aircraft.

     SEC. 134. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DIVESTMENT 
                   OR TRANSFER OF KC-10 AIRCRAFT.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air 
     Force may be obligated or expended during such fiscal year to 
     divest or transfer, or prepare to divest or transfer, KC-10 
     aircraft.

     SEC. 135. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DIVESTMENT 
                   OF E-3 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM 
                   AIRCRAFT.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to divest 
     more than four E-3 airborne warning and control system 
     aircraft, or disestablish any units of the active or reserve 
     components associated with such aircraft, until a period of 
     15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary 
     of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense 
     committees a report consisting of--
       (1) a certification that the Secretary is able to meet all 
     priority requirements of the commanders of the combatant 
     commands relating to such aircraft with a planned force of 24 
     such aircraft; and
       (2) a detailed explanation how the Secretary will meet such 
     requirements with such planned force.

       Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

     SEC. 141. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON F-35 AIRCRAFT 
                   ACQUISITION PROGRAM.

       (a) Annual Report.--Not later than April 15, 2015, and each 
     year thereafter until the F-35 aircraft acquisition program 
     enters into full-rate production, the Comptroller General of 
     the United States shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report reviewing such program.
       (b) Matters Included.--Each report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) The extent to which the F-35 aircraft acquisition 
     program is meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals.
       (2) The progress and results of developmental and 
     operational testing.
       (3) The progress of the procurement and manufacturing of F-
     35 aircraft.
       (4) An assessment of any plans or efforts of the Secretary 
     of Defense to improve the efficiency of the procurement and 
     manufacturing of F-35 aircraft.

[[Page 8608]]



         TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for 
     research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in 
     the funding table in section 4201.

    Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

     SEC. 211. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW OF PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT 
                   RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM.

       The milestone decision authority (as defined in section 
     2366b(g) of title 10, United States Code) may not make a 
     waiver under section 2366b(d) of title 10, United States 
     Code, with respect to the presidential aircraft 
     recapitalization program of the Air Force.

     SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ARMORED 
                   MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE PROGRAM.

       (a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for 
     the armored multi-purpose vehicle program, not more than 80 
     percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which 
     the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional 
     defense committees the report under subsection (b)(1).
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the 
     Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committee a report on the armored multi-purpose 
     vehicle program.
       (2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
     include the following:
       (A) An identification of the existing capability gaps of 
     the M-113 family of vehicles assigned, as of the date of the 
     report, to units outside of combat brigades.
       (B) An identification of the mission roles that are in 
     common between--
       (i) such vehicles assigned to units outside of combat 
     brigades; and
       (ii) the vehicles examined in the armor brigade combat team 
     during the armored multi-purpose vehicle analysis of 
     alternatives.
       (C) The estimated timeline and the rough order of magnitude 
     of funding requirements associated with complete M-113 family 
     of vehicles divestiture within the units outside of combat 
     brigades and the risk associated with delaying the 
     replacement of such vehicles.
       (D) A description of the requirements for force protection, 
     mobility, and size, weight, power, and cooling capacity for 
     the mission roles of M-113 family of vehicles assigned to 
     units outside of combat brigades.
       (E) A discussion of the mission roles of the M-113 family 
     of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades that 
     are comparable to the mission roles of the M-113 family of 
     vehicles assigned to armor brigade combat teams.
       (F) A discussion of whether a one-for-one replacement of 
     the M-113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of 
     combat brigades is likely.
       (G) With respect to mission roles, a discussion of any 
     substantive distinctions that exist in the capabilities of 
     the M-113 family of vehicles that are needed based on the 
     level of the unit to which the vehicle is assigned (not 
     including combat brigades).
       (H) A discussion of the relative priority of fielding among 
     the mission roles.
       (I) An assessment for the feasibility of incorporating 
     medical wheeled variants within the armor brigade combat 
     teams.

     SEC. 213. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR UNMANNED 
                   CARRIER-LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND 
                   STRIKE SYSTEM.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and 
     evaluation, Navy, for the unmanned carrier-launched airborne 
     surveillance and strike system may be obligated or expended 
     to award a contract for air vehicle segment development until 
     a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which 
     the Secretary of Defense submits the report under subsection 
     (b).
       (b) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2014, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report that--
       (1) certifies that a review of the requirements for air 
     vehicle segments of the unmanned carrier-launched 
     surveillance and strike system is complete; and
       (2) includes the results of such review.

     SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIRBORNE 
                   RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS.

       (a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, 
     for imaging and targeting support of airborne reconnaissance 
     systems, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or 
     expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air 
     Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees--
       (1) a detailed plan regarding using such funds for such 
     purpose during fiscal year 2015; and
       (2) a strategic plan for the funding of advanced airborne 
     reconnaissance technologies supporting manned and unmanned 
     systems.
       (b) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
     House of Representatives and the Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the Senate.

     SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR WEATHER 
                   SATELLITE FOLLOW-ON SYSTEM.

       (a) Manifest.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall--
       (1) place the last remaining satellite of the defense 
     meteorological satellite program on the launch manifest for 
     the evolved expendable launch vehicle program; and
       (2) establish an additional launch, for acquisition during 
     fiscal year 2015, under the evolved expendable launch vehicle 
     program using full and open competition among certified 
     providers.
       (b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, 
     for the weather satellite follow-on system, not more than 25 
     percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which 
     the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional 
     defense committees the plan under subsection (c).
       (c) Plan Required.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall 
     develop a plan to meet the meteorological and oceanographic 
     collection requirements of the Joint Requirements Oversight 
     Council. The plan shall include the following:
       (1) How the Secretary will launch and use existing assets 
     of the defense meteorological satellite program.
       (2) How the Secretary will use other sources of data, such 
     as civil, commercial satellite weather data, and 
     international partnerships, to meet such requirements.
       (3) An explanation of the relevant costs and schedule.
       (4) The requirements of the weather satellite follow-on 
     system.

     SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SPACE-BASED 
                   INFRARED SYSTEMS SPACE DATA EXPLOITATION.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, 
     development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for data 
     exploitation under the space-based infrared systems, not more 
     than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date 
     on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the 
     congressional defense committees certification that--
       (1) such funds will be used in support of data exploitation 
     of the current space-based infrared systems program of 
     record, including the scanning and staring sensor; or
       (2) the data from such program of record, including such 
     scanning and starring sensor, is being fully exploited and no 
     further efforts are warranted.

     SEC. 217. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOSTED 
                   PAYLOAD AND WIDE FIELD OF VIEW TESTBED OF THE 
                   SPACE-BASED INFRARED SYSTEMS.

       (a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, 
     for the hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the 
     space-based infrared systems program, not more than 50 
     percent may be obligated or expended on alternative 
     approaches to the program of record of such program until--
       (1) the completion of the ongoing analysis of alternatives 
     for such program of record; and
       (2) a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the 
     United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the 
     findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander 
     under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost 
     evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
     Evaluation.
       (b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not 
     apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion 
     opportunities for the program of record specified in 
     subsection (a).
       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means the following:
       (1) The congressional defense committees.
       (2) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
     House of Representatives.
       (3) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

     SEC. 218. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROTECTED 
                   TACTICAL DEMONSTRATION AND PROTECTED MILITARY 
                   SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS TESTBED OF THE 
                   ADVANCED EXTREMELY HIGH FREQUENCY PROGRAM.

       (a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, 
     for the protected tactical demonstration and protected 
     military satellite communications testbed of the advanced 
     extremely high frequency program, not more than 50 percent 
     may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the 
     program of record for such program until--
       (1) the completion of the ongoing analysis of alternatives 
     for such program of record; and
       (2) a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the 
     United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the 
     congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings 
     and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such 
     analysis of alternatives,

[[Page 8609]]

     including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost 
     Assessment and Program Evaluation.
       (b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not 
     apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion 
     opportunities for the program of record specified in 
     subsection (a).

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 221. REVISION TO THE SERVICE REQUIREMENT UNDER THE 
                   SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND RESEARCH FOR 
                   TRANSFORMATION DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM.

       Subparagraph (B) of section 2192a(c)(1) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(B) in the case of a person not an employee of the 
     Department of Defense, the person shall enter into a written 
     agreement to accept and continue employment for the period of 
     obligated service determined under paragraph (2)--
       ``(i) with the Department of Defense; or
       ``(ii) with a public or private entity or organization 
     outside the Department if the Secretary of Defense determines 
     that employment of the person with such entity or 
     organization for the purpose of such obligated service would 
     provide a benefit to the Department.''.

     SEC. 222. REVISION OF REQUIREMENT FOR ACQUISITION PROGRAMS TO 
                   MAINTAIN DEFENSE RESEARCH FACILITY RECORDS.

       (a) Revision of Functions of Defense Research Facilities.--
     Subsection (b) of section 2364 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (3), by adding ``and'' after the 
     semicolon;
       (2) in paragraph (4)--
       (A) by adding ``and issue'' between ``position'' and 
     ``papers'';
       (B) by striking ``combatant commands'' and inserting 
     ``components of the Department of Defense''; and
       (C) by striking ``; and'' and inserting a period; and
       (3) by striking paragraph (5).
       (b) Definitions.--Subsection (c) of such section is amended 
     to read as follows:
       ``(c) Defense Research Facility Defined.--In this section, 
     the term `defense research facility' means a Department of 
     Defense facility which performs or contracts for the 
     performance of--
       ``(1) basic research; or
       ``(2) applied research known as exploratory development.''.

     SEC. 223. MODIFICATION TO COST-SHARING REQUIREMENT FOR PILOT 
                   PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION 
                   FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF 
                   CERTAIN DEFENSE SYSTEMS.

       Section 243(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) 
     is amended in the matter following paragraph (2) by striking 
     ``at least one-half of the cost of such activities'' and 
     inserting ``an appropriate share of the cost of such 
     activities, as determined by the Secretary''.

                  TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and 
     maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 
     4301.

                   Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

     SEC. 311. ELIMINATION OF FISCAL YEAR LIMITATION ON 
                   PROHIBITION OF PAYMENT OF FINES AND PENALTIES 
                   FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ACCOUNT, 
                   DEFENSE.

       Section 2703(f) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``for fiscal years 1995 through 2010,''; 
     and
       (2) by striking ``for fiscal years 1997 through 2010''.

     SEC. 312. BIANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY COMMANDERS OF THE 
                   COMBATANT COMMANDS RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION 
                   ON THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS.

       Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of section 317 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
     (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) is amended to read 
     as follows:
       ``(2) Compliance.--
       ``(A) Certification of compliance.--Except as provided 
     under subparagraph (B), the commander of each combatant 
     command that is engaged in a contingency operation shall 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     House of Representatives biannual certifications that covered 
     waste under the jurisdiction of the commander has not been 
     disposed of in violation of the regulations prescribed 
     pursuant to paragraph (1) during the period covered by the 
     certification.
       ``(B) Notice of noncompliance.--If a commander determines 
     that certification cannot be made under subparagraph (A) 
     because, with respect to covered waste under the jurisdiction 
     of the commander, no alternative disposal method was feasible 
     for an open-air burn pit pursuant to regulations prescribed 
     under paragraph (1), the commander shall notify the Secretary 
     of Defense of such determination and the Secretary shall--
       ``(i) not later than 30 days after such determination is 
     made, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and House of Representatives notice of such 
     determination, including the circumstances, reasoning, and 
     methodology that led to such determination; and
       ``(ii) after notice is given under clause (i), for each 
     subsequent 180-day-period during which covered waste is 
     disposed of in the open-air burn pit covered by such notice, 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     House of Representatives the justifications of the Secretary 
     for continuing to operate such open-air burn pit.''.

     SEC. 313. EXCLUSIONS FROM DEFINITION OF ``CHEMICAL 
                   SUBSTANCE'' UNDER TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT 
                   AND REPORT ON LEAD AMMUNITION.

       (a) In General.--Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances 
     Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking 
     ``, and'' and inserting ``and any component of such an 
     article (including, without limitation, shot, bullets and 
     other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used 
     in such an article, and primers), and''.
       (b) Assessment and Report.--Not later than September 30, 
     2015, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the 
     Secretaries of the other military departments, shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a report containing 
     the results of an assessment conducted by the Secretary of 
     each of the following:
       (1) The total costs associated with the procurement of non-
     lead alternatives for small arms, broken down by type.
       (2) The total costs associated with the qualification of 
     non-lead alternatives for small arms, broken down by type.
       (3) An assessment of the extent to which non-lead variants 
     of ammunition exist for small arms, and to the extent such 
     variants exist, the extent to which such variants meet 
     service requirements and specifications.

     SEC. 314. EXEMPTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FROM ALTERNATIVE 
                   FUEL PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENT.

       Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 
     2007 (Public Law 110-140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following: ``This section shall not 
     apply to the Department of Defense.''.

     SEC. 315. CONGRESSIONAL NOTICE OF BULK PURCHASE OF 
                   ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR OPERATIONAL USE.

       Not later than 60 days before making a bulk purchase of 
     alternative fuels intended for operational use, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees notice of the intent to make such a purchase. Such 
     notice shall include the total quantity of fuel, the cost, 
     and the type of funding intended to be used to make the 
     purchase.

     SEC. 316. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF BIOFUELS.

       (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), none 
     of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be 
     used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the 
     following dates:
       (1) The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to 
     the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department.
       (2) The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011 
     (Public Law 112-25), and the sequestration in effect by 
     reason of such Act, are no longer in effect.
       (b) Exceptions.--The limitation under subsection (a) shall 
     not apply to biofuels purchased--
       (1) in limited quantities necessary to complete test and 
     certification; or
       (2) for the biofuel research and development efforts of the 
     Department.

     SEC. 317. LIMITATION ON PLAN, DESIGN, REFURBISHING, OR 
                   CONSTRUCTION OF BIOFUELS REFINERIES.

       The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for 
     the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a 
     biofuels refinery any other facility or infrastructure used 
     to refine biofuels unless such planning, design, 
     refurbishing, or construction is specifically authorized by 
     law.

                 Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

     SEC. 321. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGIC POLICY ON 
                   PREPOSITIONING OF MATERIEL AND EQUIPMENT.

       Section 2229(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by inserting ``support for crisis response 
     elements,'' after ``service requirements,''.

     SEC. 322. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORTS ON DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE PREPOSITIONING STRATEGIC POLICY AND 
                   PLAN FOR PREPOSITIONED STOCKS.

       Subsection (c) of section 321 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66) is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(c) Comptroller General Reports.--
       ``(1) Initial report.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of 
     the United States shall review the implementation plan 
     submitted under subsection (b) and the prepositioning 
     strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of title 10, 
     United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), and submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a report describing 
     the findings of such review and including any additional 
     information relating to the prepositioning strategic policy 
     and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.
       ``(2) Follow-up reports.--Following the submittal of the 
     initial report required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller 
     General shall conduct

[[Page 8610]]

     annual reviews, for each of the subsequent three years, of 
     the progress of the Department of Defense in implementing the 
     strategic policy and the Department plan for prepositioned 
     stocks, and submit to the congressional defense committees a 
     report containing an assessment of such progress, including 
     any additional information related to the management of 
     prepositioned stocks that the Comptroller General determines 
     appropriate.''.

     SEC. 323. PILOT PROGRAM ON PROVISION OF LOGISTIC SUPPORT FOR 
                   THE CONVEYANCE OF EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES TO 
                   ALLIED FORCES.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense may establish a 
     pilot program to provide logistic support for the conveyance 
     of excess defense articles to allied forces participating in 
     bilateral or multilateral training activities with the Armed 
     Forces of the United States.
       (b) Limitation.--In carrying out the pilot program under 
     this section, the Secretary may only provide logistic 
     support--
       (1) in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act and 
     other relevant export control laws of the United States;
       (2) in accordance with section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign 
     Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j);
       (3) in direct support of training activities--
       (A) carried out in support of a contingency operation or a 
     noncombat operation (including an operation in support of the 
     provision of humanitarian or foreign disaster assistance, a 
     country stabilization operation, or a peacekeeping operation 
     under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United 
     Nations); or
       (B) if the Secretary determines that the provision of such 
     support is in the best interest of the Armed Forces of the 
     Unites States.
       (c) Limitation.--The total value of logistic support 
     provided under subsection (a)(1) in any fiscal year may not 
     exceed $10,000,000.
       (d) Termination.--The authority to carry out the pilot 
     program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 
     2016.
       (e) Report.--Not later than December 31 of each year during 
     which the Secretary carried out a pilot program under this 
     section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed 
     Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 
     and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on 
     the pilot program under this section during the fiscal year 
     preceding the fiscal year during which the report is 
     submitted. Each such report shall contain each of the 
     following for the fiscal year covered by the report:
       (1) Each nation for which logistic support was provided 
     under the pilot program.
       (2) For each such nation, a description of the type and 
     value of logistic support, and the excess defense article or 
     articles conveyed.
       (f) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``logistics support'' means--
       (A) the use of military transportation and cargo-handling 
     assets, including aircraft;
       (B) materiel support in the form of fuel, petroleum, oil, 
     or lubricants; and
       (C) commercially contracted transportation.
       (2) The term ``excess defense article'' has the meaning 
     given such term in section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign 
     Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j).

                          Subtitle D--Reports

     SEC. 331. REPEAL OF ANNUAL REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   OPERATION AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR MILITARY 
                   MUSEUMS.

       (a) In General.--Section 489 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is repealed.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking 
     the item relating to section 489.

     SEC. 332. REPORT ON ENDURING REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIVITIES 
                   CURRENTLY FUNDED THROUGH AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED TO 
                   BE APPROPRIATED FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 
                   OPERATIONS.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than the date of the 
     submission of the President's budget for a fiscal year under 
     section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 
     2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report that includes each 
     of the following:
       (1) A list of enduring mission requirements, equipping, 
     training, sustainment, and other operation and maintenance 
     activities of the military departments, combat support 
     agencies, and Department of Defense that are funded through 
     amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas 
     contingency operations.
       (2) The amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     activities described in paragraph (1).
       (3) The amounts provided in the budget for fiscal year 2015 
     submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) 
     of title 31, United States Code.
       (4) A three-year plan to migrate the requirements and 
     activities on the list described in paragraph (1) to be 
     funded other than through amounts authorized to be 
     appropriated for overseas contingency operations.
       (b) Definition of Enduring.--For purposes of this section, 
     the term ``enduring'' means planned to continue to exist 
     beyond the last day of the period covered by the future-years 
     defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States 
     Code, in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 333. ARMY ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONALLY ALIGNED FORCE.

       At the same time as the President transmits to Congress the 
     budget for fiscal 2016 year under section 1105 of title 31, 
     United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees an assessment of how the 
     Army has--
       (1) captured and incorporated lessons learned through the 
     initial employment of the regionally aligned force in the 
     United States Africa Command area of responsibility;
       (2) institutionalized and improved predeployment training;
       (3) improved the coordination of activities between special 
     operations forces, Army regionally aligned units, contractors 
     of the Department of State, contractors of the Department of 
     Defense, the geographic combatant commands, the Joint Staff, 
     and international partners;
       (4) accounted for all the various funding streams used to 
     fund regionally aligned force activities, including the 
     amount of funds expended from each account;
       (5) assessed the impacts associated with long-term 
     commitments of regionally aligned forces to meet security 
     cooperation requirements;
       (6) maintained high levels of core mission readiness while 
     supporting geographic combatant commander requirements 
     through regionally aligned force activities;
       (7) planned for expansion of the regionally aligned force 
     model; and
       (8) planned to retain regional expertise within units 
     habitually aligned to a specific region.

     SEC. 334. REPORT ON IMPACTS OF FUNDING REDUCTIONS ON MILITARY 
                   READINESS.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense 
     (Comptroller) shall report to the congressional defense 
     committees on the readiness and cost impacts, both immediate 
     and long-term, for the military services, the Office of the 
     Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the 
     Defense Agencies, of the reductions in funding required in 
     section 4301 of this Act. Such report shall address each of 
     the following categories:
       (1) Reduction in contracts for Other Services, including--
       (A) impacts on mission execution and effectiveness
       (B) subsistence and support of persons, including submarine 
     galley maintenance in support of the Navy fleets;
       (C) the credentialing of health, legal, engineering, and 
     acquisition professionals, including licenses, 
     certifications, and national board examinations;
       (D) continuing education for military service members and 
     their families, including tuition assistance and completion 
     of graduate degrees, including correspondence courses;
       (E) scholarships, instructor pay, and textbooks for Reserve 
     Officer Training Corps and Junior Reserve Officer Training 
     Corps programs;
       (F) installation family support programs;
       (G) general training, including training outside normal 
     occupational specialties such as cultural and language 
     training for deploying forces;
       (H) physical fitness services;
       (I) the annual audit of financial records and annual review 
     of acquisition programs;
       (J) drivers for security details;
       (K) foreign national indirect hires;
       (L) port visit costs and port visit security;
       (M) Defense Travel System afloat support;
       (N) engineering readiness assessment teams;
       (O) sexual assault and suicide prevention and response 
     programs;
       (P) student meal programs and educational assistance 
     purchases;
       (Q) employer support to the National Guard and Reserve;
       (R) Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program; and
       (S) network programming activities, database sustainment, 
     and improvement.
       (2) Reductions in contracts for facility sustainment, 
     restoration, and modernization, including--
       (A) impacts to mission execution and effectiveness;
       (B) impacts to life, health and safety, including fire and 
     emergency services;
       (C) impacts to training;
       (D) deferrals of repairs or upgrades to mission-critical 
     infrastructure, including roads, electrical systems, heating 
     and air conditioning systems, and buildings;
       (E) deferrals of repairs or upgrades to airfield runways, 
     taxiways and aprons;
       (F) installation security through the deferrals of repairs, 
     replacements or reconfigurations of gates or other 
     installation security components;
       (G) base operations due to deferral of facility 
     renovations, consolidations, conversions, or demolitions;
       (H) operation of dining facilities;
       (I) utility privatization;
       (J) deferrals of repair and renovation of barracks;
       (K) facilities engineering services;
       (L) dredging of navigation channels;
       (M) execution of the minimum six percent capital investment 
     program required under section 2476 of title 10, United 
     States Code; and
       (N) maintenance, repairs, and modernization of Department 
     of Defense dependent schools in Europe and the Pacific and 
     defense domestic dependent elementary schools.
       (3) Reductions in civilian personnel, including--
       (A) mission execution and effectiveness;
       (B) the ability to recruit, hire, and train civilian 
     employees;
       (C) the cost of overtime that will be generated as a result 
     of unfilled civilian personnel billets;
       (D) the morale of the civilian workforce; and

[[Page 8611]]

       (E) the ability to execute reductions in force within the 
     fiscal year.
       (4) Reductions in unobligated balances of prior-year 
     funding, including:
       (A) mission execution and effectiveness; and
       (B) the ability to execute reductions within the fiscal 
     year.
       (5) Any other information that the Under Secretary 
     determines is relevant to enhancing the committees' 
     understanding of the impacts of the required reductions in 
     funding.
       (b) Form of Report.--The Comptroller General may report to 
     the congressional defense committees, as required by 
     subsection (a), either by providing a briefing or a written 
     report.

          Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

     SEC. 341. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT 
                   FOR THE SUSTAINMENT, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OR 
                   OVERHAUL OF THE F117 ENGINE.

       The Secretary of the Air Force may not enter into a 
     contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or 
     overhaul of the F117 engine until the Under Secretary of 
     Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies 
     to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of 
     the Air Force has structured the contract in such a way that 
     provides the Secretary of the Air Force the required insight 
     into all aspects of F117 system, subsystem, components, and 
     subcomponents regarding historical usage rates, cost, price, 
     expected and actual service-life, and supply chain management 
     data sufficient to determine that the Secretary of the Air 
     Force is paying a fair and reasonable price for F117 
     sustainment, maintenance, repair, and overhaul as compared to 
     the PW2000 commercial-derivative engine sustainment price for 
     sustainment, maintenance, repair, and overhaul in the private 
     sector. The Secretary may waive the limitation in the 
     preceding sentence to enter into a contract if the Secretary 
     determines that such a waiver is in the interest of national 
     security.

                       Subtitle F--Other Matters

     SEC. 351. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY RELATING TO PROVISION OF 
                   INSTALLATION-SUPPORT SERVICES THROUGH 
                   INTERGOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT AGREEMENTS.

       (i) Transfer of Section 2336 to Chapter 159.--
       (1) Transfer and redesignation.--Section 2336 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is transferred to chapter 159 of such 
     title, inserted after section 2678, and redesignated as 
     section 2679.
       (2) Revised section heading.--The heading of such section, 
     as so transferred and redesignated, is amended to read as 
     follows:

     ``Sec. 2679. Installation-support services: intergovernmental 
       support agreements''.

       (b) Clarifying Amendments.--Such section, as so transferred 
     and redesignated, is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Secretary 
     concerned'' and inserting ``Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary concerned''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2)--
       (i) by striking ``Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, an'' and inserting ``An'';
       (ii) by striking subparagraph (A); and
       (iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
     subparagraphs (A) and (B) respectively; and
       (2) by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(4) The term `intergovernmental support agreement' means 
     a legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the 
     Secretary concerned and a State or local government that 
     contains such terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned 
     considers appropriate for the purposes of this section and 
     necessary to protect the interests of the United States.''.
       (c) Clerical Amendments.--
       (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 
     of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
     section 2336.
       (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 
     of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating 
     to section 2678 the following new item:

``2679. Installation-support Services: intergovernmental support 
              agreements.''.

     SEC. 352. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ACCESS TO TRAINING RANGES 
                   WITHIN UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND AREA OF 
                   RESPONSIBILITY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) Reliable access to military training ranges is an 
     essential component of military readiness.
       (2) The training opportunities provided by military 
     training ranges are critical to maintaining the technical and 
     operational superiority of the Armed Forces.
       (3) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review states that the 
     operational readiness of the Armed Forces hinges on unimpeded 
     access to land, air, and sea training and test space.
       (4) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review states that United 
     States forces in the Asia-Pacific region ``will resume 
     regular bilateral and multilateral training exercises, pursue 
     increased training opportunities to improve capabilities and 
     capacity of partner nations, as well as support humanitarian, 
     disaster relief, counterterrorism, and other operations that 
     contribute to the stability of the region''.
       (5) A number of critical military training ranges, 
     including the Pohakuloa Training Center in Hawaii, are 
     located within the United States Pacific Command area of 
     responsibility providing units from all the military 
     services, as well as allied and partner militaries with 
     realistic joint and combined arms training opportunities.
       (6) Due to the ``tyranny of distance'' in the Asia-Pacific 
     region, there are significant challenges in transporting 
     equipment and personnel to the various military training 
     ranges within the United States Pacific Command area of 
     responsibility.
       (7) The Department of Defense continues a number of efforts 
     aimed at preserving military training ranges, while also 
     minimizing the environmental effects of training activities.
       (8) The Department of Defense has a variety of authorities 
     that may be used to mitigate encroachment on military testing 
     and training missions.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--In light of the findings specified 
     in subsection (a), it is the sense of Congress that the 
     Secretary of Defense should--
       (1) ensure that members of the Armed Forces continue to 
     have reliable access to military training ranges;
       (2) optimize the use of multilateral, joint training 
     facilities overseas in order to increase readiness and 
     interoperability with allies and partners of the United 
     States;
       (3) utilize a full range of assets, including both air- and 
     sea-based assets, including inactive Joint High Speed 
     Vessels, to improve accessibility to military training areas 
     within the United States Pacific Command area of 
     responsibility;
       (4) provide stable budget authority for long-term 
     investments in range and test center infrastructure to lower 
     the cost of access to the ranges and training centers;
       (5) take appropriate action to identify and leverage 
     existing authorities and programs, as well as work with State 
     and municipalities to leverage their authorities, to mitigate 
     encroachment or other challenges that have the potential to 
     impact future access or operations on military training 
     ranges;
       (6) maximize the use of the United States Pacific Command 
     training ranges, including Pohakuloa Training Center in 
     Hawaii, by the military departments and increase the use of 
     such training ranges for bilateral and multilateral exercises 
     with regional allies and partners; and
       (7) take appropriate action to leverage existing 
     authorities and programs, as well as work with local 
     governments to leverage their authorities, to address any 
     challenges that have the potential to impede future access to 
     or operations on military training ranges.

     SEC. 353. MANAGEMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AMMUNITION INVENTORY.

       (a) Consolidation of Data.--Not later than 90 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of 
     Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in 
     conjunction with the Secretaries of the Army, Air Force, and 
     Navy, shall issue Department-wide guidance and designate an 
     authoritative database on conventional ammunition. Not later 
     than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
     Under Secretary shall notify the congressional defense 
     committees on what database has been designated under this 
     subsection.
       (b) Annual Report.--The Secretary of the Army will include 
     in its annual ammunition inventory reports information on all 
     available ammunition for use during the redistribution 
     process, including ammunition that was unclaimed in a during 
     a year before the year during which the report is submitted 
     by another service and categorized for disposal.

              TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

                       Subtitle A--Active Forces

     SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES.

       The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty 
     personnel as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
       (1) The Army, 490,000.
       (2) The Navy, 323,600.
       (3) The Marine Corps, 184,100.
       (4) The Air Force, 311,220.

     SEC. 402. REVISIONS IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH 
                   MINIMUM LEVELS.

       Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the 
     following new paragraphs:
       ``(1) For the Army, 490,000.
       ``(2) For the Navy, 323,600.
       ``(3) For the Marine Corps, 184,100.
       ``(4) For the Air Force, 310,900.''.

                       Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

     SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE.

       (a) In General.--The Armed Forces are authorized strengths 
     for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as 
     of September 30, 2015, as follows:
       (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 350,200.
       (2) The Army Reserve, 202,000.
       (3) The Navy Reserve, 57,300.
       (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,200.
       (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,000.
       (6) The Air Force Reserve, 67,100.
       (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000.
       (b) End Strength Reductions.--The end strengths prescribed 
     by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve 
     component shall be proportionately reduced by--
       (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to 
     serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component 
     which are on active duty (other

[[Page 8612]]

     than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and
       (2) the total number of individual members not in units 
     organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such 
     component who are on active duty (other than for training or 
     for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their 
     consent at the end of the fiscal year.
       (c) End Strength Increases.--Whenever units or individual 
     members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are 
     released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end 
     strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected 
     Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased 
     proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such 
     units and by the total number of such individual members.

     SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN 
                   SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES.

       Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the 
     reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of 
     September 30, 2015, the following number of Reserves to be 
     serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the 
     case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of 
     organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or 
     training the reserve components:
       (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 31,385.
       (2) The Army Reserve, 16,261.
       (3) The Navy Reserve, 9,973.
       (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
       (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,704.
       (6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,830.

     SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL 
                   STATUS).

       The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as 
     of the last day of fiscal year 2015 for the reserve 
     components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding 
     section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the 
     following:
       (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 
     27,210.
       (2) For the Army Reserve, 7,895.
       (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 
     21,792.
       (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 9,789.

     SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2015 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL 
                   STATUS TECHNICIANS.

       (a) Limitations.--
       (1) National guard.--Within the limitation provided in 
     section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the 
     number of non-dual status technicians employed by the 
     National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the 
     following:
       (A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 
     1,600.
       (B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
       (2) Army reserve.--The number of non-dual status 
     technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 
     2015, may not exceed 595.
       (3) Air force reserve.--The number of non-dual status 
     technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 
     30, 2015, may not exceed 90.
       (b) Non-Dual Status Technicians Defined.--In this section, 
     the term ``non-dual status technician'' has the meaning given 
     that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States 
     Code.

     SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO 
                   BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT.

       During fiscal year 2015, the maximum number of members of 
     the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving 
     at any time on full-time operational support duty under 
     section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the 
     following:
       (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
       (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000.
       (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
       (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
       (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
       (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.

              Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the 
     use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of 
     the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 
     provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4401.
       (b) Construction of Authorization.--The authorization of 
     appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other 
     authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for 
     such purpose for fiscal year 2015.

                   TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

             Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

     SEC. 501. AUTHORITY TO LIMIT CONSIDERATION FOR EARLY 
                   RETIREMENT BY SELECTIVE RETIREMENT BOARDS TO 
                   PARTICULAR WARRANT OFFICER YEAR GROUPS AND 
                   SPECIALTIES.

       Section 581(d) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
       (2) by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as 
     paragraph (2); and
       (3) in paragraph (2), as so designated--
       (A) by striking ``the list shall include each'' and 
     inserting ``the list shall include--
       ``(A) the name of each'';
       (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
     or''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(B) with respect to a group of warrant officers 
     designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a particular 
     grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers 
     in that grade and competitive category who are also in a 
     particular year group or specialty, or any combination 
     thereof determined by the Secretary.''.

     SEC. 502. RELIEF FROM LIMITS ON PERCENTAGE OF OFFICERS WHO 
                   MAY BE RECOMMENDED FOR DISCHARGE DURING A 
                   FISCAL YEAR USING ENHANCED AUTHORITY FOR 
                   SELECTIVE EARLY DISCHARGES.

       Section 638a(d) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking paragraph (3); and
       (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
     (3) and (4), respectively.

     SEC. 503. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS OF 
                   ANNUAL REPORTS ON JOINT OFFICER MANAGEMENT AND 
                   PROMOTION POLICY OBJECTIVES FOR JOINT OFFICERS.

       (a) Repeal of Annual Reports.--
       (1) Joint officer management.--Section 667 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is repealed.
       (2) Promotion policy objectives for joint officers.--
     Section 662 of such title is amended--
       (A) by striking ``(a) Qualifications.--''; and
       (B) by striking subsection (b).
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 38 of such title is amended by striking 
     the item relating to section 667.

     SEC. 504. OPTIONS FOR PHASE II OF JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY 
                   EDUCATION.

       Section 2154(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``consisting of a joint professional 
     military education curriculum'' and all that follows through 
     the period at the end and inserting the following: 
     ``consisting of--
       ``(A) a joint professional military education curriculum 
     taught in residence at the Joint Forces Staff College or a 
     senior level service school that has been designated and 
     certified by the Secretary of Defense as a joint professional 
     military education institution; or
       ``(B) a senior level service course of at least ten months 
     that has been designated and certified by the Secretary of 
     Defense as a joint professional military education course.''.

     SEC. 505. LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF ENLISTED AIDES AUTHORIZED 
                   FOR OFFICERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, AND 
                   MARINE CORPS.

       (a) Modification of Current Limitation.--Section 981 of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the sum of (1)'' and 
     all that follows through the period at end of the subsection 
     and inserting the following: ``the sum of--
       ``(1) two times the number of officers serving on active 
     duty at the end of the preceding fiscal year in the grade of 
     general or admiral; and
       ``(2) the number of officers serving on active duty at the 
     end of the preceding fiscal year in the grade of lieutenant 
     general or vice admiral.''; and
       (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``Not more than 300 
     enlisted members'' and inserting ``Not more than the lesser 
     of 300 enlisted members or the number of enlisted members 
     determined for a fiscal year under subsection (a)''.
       (b) Annual Report.--Such section is further amended by 
     adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 
     the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 
     specifying--
       ``(1) the total number of enlisted members assigned to duty 
     at any time during the previous fiscal year as enlisted aides 
     for officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps; 
     and
       ``(2) the number of authorized enlisted aides by each 
     general officer and flag officer position during the previous 
     fiscal year.''.

     SEC. 506. REQUIRED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN ELEMENTS OF 
                   COMMAND CLIMATE IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS OF 
                   COMMANDING OFFICERS.

       The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that 
     the performance appraisal of a commanding officer in an Armed 
     Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary indicates the 
     extent to which the commanding officer has or has not 
     established a command climate in which--
       (1) allegations of sexual assault are properly managed and 
     fairly evaluated; and
       (2) a victim of criminal activity, including sexual 
     assault, can report the criminal activity without fear of 
     retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from 
     other members of the command.

           Subtitle B--Reserve Component Personnel Management

     SEC. 511. RETENTION ON THE RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST 
                   FOLLOWING NONSELECTION FOR PROMOTION OF CERTAIN 
                   HEALTH PROFESSIONS OFFICERS AND FIRST 
                   LIEUTENANTS AND LIEUTENANTS (JUNIOR GRADE) 
                   PURSUING BACCALAUREATE DEGREES.

       (a) Retention of Certain First Lieutenants and Lieutenants 
     (Junior Grade) Following Nonselection for Promotion.--
     Subsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``A reserve officer of'' and inserting 
     ``(A) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy,

[[Page 8613]]

     Air Force, or Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who 
     is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list 
     under section 14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of'';
       (2) by striking ``of this title may, subject to the needs 
     of the service and to section 14509 of this title,'' and 
     inserting ``of this title, may'';
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
       ``(B) A reserve officer covered by this subparagraph is a 
     reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps who 
     holds the grade of first lieutenant, or a reserve officer of 
     the Navy who holds the grade of lieutenant (junior grade), 
     and who--
       ``(i) is a health professions officer; or
       ``(ii) is actively pursuing an undergraduate program of 
     education leading to a baccalaureate degree.
       ``(C) The consideration of a reserve officer for 
     continuation on the reserve active-status list pursuant to 
     this paragraph is subject to the needs of the service and to 
     section 14509 of this title.''.
       (b) Retention of Health Professions Officers.--Such section 
     is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsection (b):
       ``(b) Continuation of Health Professions Officers.--(1) 
     Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions 
     officer obligated to a period of service incurred under 
     section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed 
     from the reserve active-status list under section 14504, 
     14505, 14506, or 14507 of this title and who has not 
     completed a service obligation incurred under section 16201 
     of this title shall be retained on the reserve active-status 
     list until the completion of such service obligation and then 
     discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another 
     provision of law.
       ``(2) The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability 
     of paragraph (1) to any officer if the Secretary determines 
     that completion of the service obligation of that officer is 
     not in the best interest of the service.
       ``(3) A health professions officer who is continued on the 
     reserve active-status list under this subsection who is 
     subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of officers 
     recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not 
     required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the 
     officer's service obligation. Such officer may continue on 
     the reserve active-status list as other officers of the same 
     grade unless separated under another provision of law.''.

     SEC. 512. CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU ROLE IN 
                   ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECTORS AND DEPUTY DIRECTORS OF 
                   THE ARMY AND AIR NATIONAL GUARDS.

       (a) Recommendation by Chief of the National Guard Bureau.--
     Paragraph (1) of section 10506(a) of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``selected by the 
     Secretary of the Army'' and inserting ``recommended by the 
     Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of the Army,''; and
       (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``selected by the 
     Secretary of the Air Force'' and inserting ``recommended by 
     the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with 
     the Secretary of the Air Force,''.
       (b) Assistance to Chief of the National Guard Bureau.--
     Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by striking ``The 
     officers so selected'' and inserting ``The Director and 
     Deputy Director, Army National Guard, and the Director and 
     Deputy Director, Air National Guard,''.
       (c) Condition on Assignment and Conforming Amendments.--
     Paragraph (3) of such section is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``The President'' and 
     inserting ``Consistent with paragraph (1), the President'';
       (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``the Secretary of the 
     military department concerned'' and inserting ``the Chief of 
     the National Guard Bureau as provided in paragraph (1)'';
       (3) by striking subparagraph (D); and
       (4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (D).

     SEC. 513. NATIONAL GUARD CIVIL AND DEFENSE SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 
                   AND RELATED MATTERS.

       (a) Operational Use of the National Guard.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 116. OPERATIONAL USE OF THE NATIONAL GUARD.

       ``(a) In General.--This section authorizes the operational 
     use of the National Guard and recognizes that the basic 
     premise of both the National Incident Management System and 
     the National Response Framework is that--
       ``(1) incidents are typically managed at the local level 
     first; and
       ``(2) local jurisdictions retain command, control, and 
     authority over response activities for their jurisdictional 
     areas.
       ``(b) Assistance to Civilian Firefighting Organizations.--
       ``(1) Assistance authorized.--Members and units of the 
     National Guard shall be authorized to support firefighting 
     operations, missions, or activities, including aerial 
     firefighting employment of the Modular Airborne Firefighting 
     System (MAFFS), undertaken in support of a civilian authority 
     or a State or Federal agency.
       ``(2) Role of governor and state adjutant general.--For the 
     purposes of paragraph (1)--
       ``(A) the Governor of a State shall be the principal 
     civilian authority; and
       ``(B) the adjutant general of the State shall be the 
     principal military authority, when acting in his or her State 
     capacity, and has the primary authority to mobilize members 
     and units of the National Guard of the State in any duty 
     status under this title the adjutant general deems 
     appropriate to employ necessary forces when funds to perform 
     such operations, missions, or activities are reimbursed.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``116. Operational use of the National Guard.''.

       (b) Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) Support.--Section 328(b) 
     of title 32, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``duty as specified in section 116(b) of 
     this title or may perform'' after ``subsection (a) may 
     perform''; and
       (2) by inserting ``(A) and (B)'' after `` specified in 
     section 502(f)(2)''.
       (c) Federal Technicians Support.--Section 709(a)(3) of 
     title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``duty 
     as specified in section 116(b) of this title or'' after ``(3) 
     the performance of''.

                Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

     SEC. 521. PROCEDURES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MILITARY 
                   PERSONNEL DECISIONS RELATING TO CORRECTION OF 
                   MILITARY RECORDS.

       (a) Availability of Judicial Review; Limitations.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 79 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     section:

     ``Sec. 1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to 
       correction of military records

       ``(a) Availability of Judicial Review.--
       ``(1) In general.--Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of 
     title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5, any person adversely 
     affected by a records correction final decision may obtain 
     judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction 
     to hear the matter.
       ``(2) Records correction final decision defined.--In this 
     section, the term `records correction final decision' means 
     any of the following decisions:
       ``(A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned 
     pursuant to section 1552 of this title.
       ``(B) A final decision issued by the Secretary of a 
     military department or the Secretary of Homeland Security 
     pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title.
       ``(C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense 
     pursuant to section 1034(h) of this title.
       ``(D) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned 
     pursuant to section 1554a of this title.
       ``(b) Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies.--
       ``(1) General rule.--Except as provided in paragraphs (3) 
     and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to 
     correction under a provision of law specified in subsection 
     (a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other 
     provision of law unless--
       ``(A) the petitioner has requested a correction under 
     sections 1552 or 1554a of this title (including such a 
     request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this 
     title); and
       ``(B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision 
     denying that correction in whole or in part.
       ``(2) Whistleblower cases.--When the final decision of the 
     Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of 
     Defense under section 1034(h) of this title, the petitioner 
     is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial 
     review, but if the petitioner seeks such review, judicial 
     review may not be sought until the earlier of the following 
     occurs:
       ``(A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the 
     matter.
       ``(B) The period specified in section 1034(h) of this title 
     for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires.
       ``(3) Class actions.--If judicial review of a records 
     correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for 
     such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with 
     respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a 
     correction under section 1552 of this title (including a 
     request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title) 
     and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case, 
     paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the 
     certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to 
     any matter covered by a claim for which the class is 
     certified.
       ``(4) Timeliness.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the 
     records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned 
     is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on 
     which the petitioner requests a correction.
       ``(c) Statutes of Limitation.--
       ``(1) Six years from final decision.--A records correction 
     final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2) 
     applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section 
     or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition 
     for such review is filed in a court not later than six years 
     after the date of the records correction final decision.
       ``(2) Six years for certain claims that may result in 
     payment of money.--(A) In a case of a records correction 
     final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records 
     correction final decision (or the portion of such decision 
     described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial 
     review under this section or otherwise subject to review in 
     any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court 
     before the end of the six-year period that began on the date 
     of

[[Page 8614]]

     discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death 
     while on active duty, of the person whose military records 
     are the subject of the correction request. Such period does 
     not include any time between the date of the filing of the 
     request for correction of military records leading to the 
     records correction final decision and the date of the final 
     decision.
       ``(B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction 
     final decision or portion of the decision that involves a 
     denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the 
     court, would support, or result in, the payment of money 
     either under a court order or under a subsequent 
     administrative determination, other than payments made 
     under--
       ``(i) chapter 61 of this title to a claimant who prior to 
     such records correction final decision, was not the subject 
     of a decision by a physical evaluation board or by any other 
     board authorized to grant disability payments to the 
     claimant; or
       ``(ii) chapter 73 of this title.
       ``(d) Habeas Corpus.--This section does not affect any 
     cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``1560. Judicial review of decisions.''.
       (b) Effect of Denial of Request for Correction of Records 
     When Prohibited Personnel Action Alleged.--
       (1) Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review.--
     Subsection (g) of section 1034 of such title is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(7) In any case in which the final decision of the 
     Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, 
     of any requested correction of the record of the member or 
     former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the 
     member or former member--
       ``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(B) a written notification of the availability of 
     judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of 
     this title and the time period for obtaining such review in 
     accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.''.
       (2) Secretary of defense review; notice of denial.--
     Subsection (h) of such section is amended--
       (A) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Upon the completion of 
     all''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense 
     by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be 
     made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former 
     member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military 
     department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the 
     final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial, 
     in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the 
     record of the member or former member, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall provide the member or former member--
       ``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(B) a written notification of the availability of 
     judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of 
     this title and the time period for obtaining such review in 
     accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.''.
       (3) Sole basis for judicial review.--Such section is 
     further amended--
       (A) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j) as subsections 
     (j) and (k), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 
     subsection (i):
       ``(i) Judicial Review.--(1) A decision of the Secretary of 
     Defense under subsection (h) shall be subject to judicial 
     review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.
       ``(2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense 
     under subsection (h) was not sought, a decision of the 
     Secretary of a military department under subsection (g) shall 
     be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 
     1560 of this title.
       ``(3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security 
     under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial review only 
     as provided in section 1560 of this title.''.
       (c) Effect of Denial of Other Requests for Correction of 
     Military Records.--Section 1552 of such title is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new subsections:
       ``(h) In any case in which the final decision of the 
     Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, 
     of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall 
     provide the claimant--
       ``(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(2) a written notification of the availability of 
     judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of 
     this title and the time period for obtaining such review in 
     accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.
       ``(i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this 
     section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided 
     in section 1560 of this title.''.
       (d) Judicial Review of Corrections Recommended by the 
     Physical Disability Board of Review.--Section 1554a of such 
     title is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (h); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
     subsections (f) and (g):
       ``(f) Record of Decision and Notification.--In any case in 
     which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results 
     in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction 
     of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary 
     shall provide to the member or former member--
       ``(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(2) a written notification of the availability of 
     judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of 
     this title and the time period for obtaining such review in 
     accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.
       ``(g) Judicial Review.--A decision by the Secretary 
     concerned under this section shall be subject to judicial 
     review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.''.
       (e) Effective Date and Application.--
       (1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall 
     take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, and shall apply to all final decisions of the Secretary 
     of Defense under section 1034(h) of title 10, United States 
     Code, and of the Secretary of a military department and the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security under sections 1034(g), 1552, 
     or 1554a of such title rendered on or after such date.
       (2) Treatment of existing cases.--This section and the 
     amendments made by this section do not affect the authority 
     of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was 
     properly before the court before the effective date specified 
     in paragraph (1).
       (f) Implementation.--The Secretary of the military 
     department concerned and, in the case of the Coast Guard, the 
     Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating may prescribe regulations, and interim guidance 
     before prescribing such regulations, to implement the 
     amendments made by this section. Regulations or interim 
     guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military department 
     may not take effect until approved by the Secretary of 
     Defense.

     SEC. 522. ADDITIONAL REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF TRANSITION 
                   ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

       (a) Information on Educational Assistance and Other 
     Available Benefits.--Section 1144 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as 
     subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
     subsection (c):
       ``(c) Additional Elements of Program.--The mandatory 
     program carried out by this section also shall include the 
     following:
       ``(1) For any such member who plans to use the member's 
     entitlement to educational assistance under title 38--
       ``(A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such 
     entitlement; and
       ``(B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for 
     the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible 
     with the member's education goals, and instruction on how to 
     finance the member's post-secondary education.
       ``(2) Instruction in the benefits under laws administered 
     by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects 
     determined to be appropriate by the Secretary concerned.''.
       (b) Deadline for Implementation.--The program carried out 
     under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall 
     comply with the requirements of subsection (c) of such 
     section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than April 
     1, 2016.

     SEC. 523. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT CAREER 
                   FLEXIBILITY PROGRAMS.

       (a) Duration of Program Authority.--Subsection (m) of 
     section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 
     10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note), as amended by section 531(a) of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1403) and redesignated by 
     section 522(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1722), is 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2015'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2019''.
       (b) Conforming Amendments to Reporting Requirements.--
     Subsection (k) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, as amended by 
     section 531(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2012, is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and 2017'' and 
     inserting ``, 2017, and 2019''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``March 1, 2019'' and 
     inserting ``March 1, 2020''.

     SEC. 524. PROVISION OF INFORMATION TO MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES ON PRIVACY RIGHTS RELATING TO RECEIPT OF 
                   MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES.

       (a) Provision of Information Required.--The Secretaries of 
     the military departments shall ensure that the information 
     described in subsection (b) is provided--
       (1) to each officer candidate during initial training;
       (2) to each recruit during basic training; and
       (3) to other members of the Armed Forces at such times as 
     the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
       (b) Required Information.--The information required to be 
     provided under subsection (a) shall include information on 
     the applicability of Department of Defense Directive 6025.18 
     and other regulations regarding privacy prescribed pursuant 
     to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 
     1996 (Public Law 104-191) to records regarding a member of 
     the Armed Forces seeking and receiving mental health 
     services.

[[Page 8615]]



     SEC. 525. PROTECTION OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF MILITARY 
                   CHAPLAINS TO CLOSE A PRAYER OUTSIDE OF A 
                   RELIGIOUS SERVICE ACCORDING TO THE TRADITIONS, 
                   EXPRESSIONS, AND RELIGIOUS EXERCISES OF THE 
                   ENDORSING FAITH GROUP.

       (a) United States Army.--Section 3547 of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new subsection:
       ``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (b) United States Military Academy.--Section 4337 of such 
     title is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (c) United States Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6031 of 
     such title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (d) United States Air Force.--Section 8547 of such title is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (e) United States Air Force Academy.--Section 9337 of such 
     title is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.

     SEC. 526. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR ADVISOR ON 
                   PROFESSIONALISM.

       (a) Initial Congressional Oversight.--In the development of 
     the roles, responsibilities, and goals of the Department of 
     Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism to strengthen 
     professionalism programs in the Department of Defense, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall communicate with the Committees on 
     Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
     regarding the mission, goals, and metrics for the Senior 
     Advisor on Professionalism.
       (b) Initial Review by Senior Advisor on Professionalism.--
     Upon appointment of the Senior Advisor on Professionalism, 
     the Senior Advisor on Professionalism shall--
       (1) conduct a preliminary review of the effectiveness of 
     current programs and controls of the Department of Defense 
     and the military departments regarding professionalism; and
       (2) submit, not later than September 1, 2015, to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives recommendations to strengthen professionalism 
     programs in the Department of Defense.

     SEC. 527. REMOVAL OF ARTIFICIAL BARRIERS TO THE SERVICE OF 
                   WOMEN IN THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Validation and Oversight of Gender-neutral Occupational 
     Standards.--
       (1) Validation; purpose.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     direct the Secretary of each military department to validate 
     the gender-neutral occupational standards used by the Armed 
     Forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary for the 
     purpose of ensuring that the standards--
       (A) are consistent with section 543 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160; 
     10 U.S.C. 113 note), as amended by section 523 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 
     (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 756), which requires gender-
     neutral occupational standards, requiring performance 
     outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of 
     the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the 
     qualifications and duties performed;
       (B) accurately predict performance of actual, regular, and 
     recurring duties of a military occupation; and
       (C) are applied equitably to measure individual 
     capabilities.
       (2) Role of independent research entity.--To comply with 
     paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments 
     shall work with an independent research entity identified by 
     the Secretaries.
       (b) Infantry Training Courses.--Not later than 60 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     the Navy shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of 
     the Senate and the House of Representatives with a briefing 
     on the Marine Corps research involving female members of the 
     Marine Corps who volunteer for the Infantry Officers Course 
     (IOC), the enlisted infantry training course (ITB), and the 
     Ground Combat Element Experimental Task-Force (GCEXTF) for 
     the purpose of--
       (1) determining what metrics the Marine Corps used to 
     develop the research requirements and elements for the Marine 
     Corps Expanded Entry-Level Training Research;
       (2) indicating what is being evaluated during these 
     research studies, along with how long both research studies 
     will last; and
       (3) identifying how data gathered during the research 
     studies will be used to open infantry and other closed 
     occupations.
       (c) Female Personal Protection Gear.--The Secretary of 
     Defense shall direct each Secretary of a military department 
     to take immediate steps to ensure that properly designed and 
     fitted combat equipment is available and distributed to 
     female members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of 
     that Secretary.
       (d) Review of Outreach and Recruitment Efforts Focused on 
     Officers.--
       (1) Review required.--The Comptroller General of United 
     States shall conduct a review of Services' Outreach and 
     Recruitment Efforts gauged toward women representation in the 
     officer corps.
       (2) Elements of review.--In conducting the review under 
     this subsection, the Comptroller General shall--
       (A) identify and evaluate current initiatives the Armed 
     Forces are using to increase accession of women into the 
     officer corps;
       (B) identify new recruiting efforts to increase accessions 
     of women into the officer corps specifically at the military 
     service academies, Officer Candidate Schools, Officer 
     Training Schools, the Academy of Military Science, and 
     Reserve Officer Training Corps; and
       (C) identify efforts, resources, and funding required to 
     increase military service academy accessions by women by an 
     additional 20 percent.
       (3) Submission of results.--Not later than April 1, 2015, 
     the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report 
     containing the results of the review under this subsection.

  Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic 
                    Violence Prevention and Response

     SEC. 531. IMPROVED DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INFORMATION 
                   REPORTING AND COLLECTION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 
                   INCIDENTS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES.

       (a) Data Reporting and Collection Improvements.--Not later 
     than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
     the Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive 
     management plan to address deficiencies in the reporting of 
     information on incidents of domestic violence involving 
     members of the Armed Forces for inclusion in the Department 
     of Defense database on domestic violence incidents required 
     by section 1562 of title 10, United States Code, to ensure 
     that the database provides an accurate count of domestic 
     violence incidents and any consequent disciplinary action.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 543(a) of the Ike 
     Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1562 note) is amended by 
     striking paragraph (1).

     SEC. 532. ADDITIONAL DUTY FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PANEL 
                   REGARDING USE OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS BY 
                   DEFENSE DURING PRELIMINARY HEARING AND COURT-
                   MARTIAL PROCEEDINGS.

       (a) Review Required.--The independent panel established by 
     the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(2) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the ``judicial 
     proceedings panel'', shall conduct a review and assessment 
     of--
       (1) the impact of the use of mental health records by the 
     defense during the preliminary hearing conducted under 
     section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of 
     the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and during court-
     martial proceedings; and
       (2) the use of mental health records in civilian criminal 
     legal proceedings in order to identify any significant 
     discrepancies between the two legal systems.
       (b) Submission of Results.--The judicial proceedings panel 
     shall include the results of the review and assessment in one 
     of the reports required by section 576(c)(2)(B) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

     SEC. 533. APPLICABILITY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND 
                   RESPONSE AND RELATED MILITARY JUSTICE 
                   ENHANCEMENTS TO MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMIES.

       The Secretary of the military department concerned and, in 
     the case of the Coast Guard Academy, the Secretary of the 
     Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure 
     that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title, 
     apply to the United States Military Academy, the Naval 
     Academy, the Air Force Academy, and the Coast Guard Academy.

     SEC. 534. CONSULTATION WITH VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 
                   REGARDING VICTIMS' PREFERENCE FOR PROSECUTION 
                   OF OFFENSE BY COURT-MARTIAL OR CIVILIAN COURT.

       (a) Legal Consultation Between Special Victims' Counsel and 
     Victim of Sexual Assault.--Subsection (b) of section 1044e of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9) as 
     paragraphs (7), (8), (9), and (10), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
     paragraph (6):
       ``(6) Legal consultation regarding the advantages and 
     disadvantages of prosecution of the

[[Page 8616]]

     alleged sex-related offense by court-martial or by a civilian 
     court with jurisdiction over the offense before the victim 
     expresses a preference as to the prosecution authority 
     pursuant to the process required by subsection (e)(3).''.
       (b) Process to Discern Victim Preference.--Subsection (e) 
     of such section is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(3) The Secretary concerned shall establish a process to 
     ensure consultation with a victim of an alleged sex-related 
     offense that occurs in the United States to discern the 
     victim's preference regarding prosecution authority, 
     regardless of whether the report of that offense is 
     restricted or unrestricted.''.

     SEC. 535. ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS RELATED TO 
                   PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY CERTAIN MILITARY RULES 
                   OF EVIDENCE.

       Section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of 
     the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding 
     at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(e) Enforcement by Court of Criminal Appeals.--(1) If the 
     victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a 
     court-martial ruling violates the victim's rights afforded by 
     a Military Rule of Evidence specified in paragraph (2), the 
     victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ 
     of mandamus to require the court-martial to comply with the 
     Military Rule of Evidence. The Court of Criminal Appeals may 
     issue the writ on the order of a single judge and shall take 
     up and decide the petition within 72 hours after the petition 
     has been filed.
       ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to the protections 
     afforded by the following:
       ``(A) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the 
     psychotherapist-patient privilege.
       ``(B) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the 
     admission of evidence regarding a victim's sexual background.
       ``(3) Court-martial proceedings may not be stayed or 
     subject to a continuance of more than five days for purposes 
     of enforcing this subsection. If the Court of Criminal 
     Appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the denial 
     shall be clearly stated on the record in a written 
     opinion.''.

     SEC. 536. MINIMUM CONFINEMENT PERIOD REQUIRED FOR CONVICTION 
                   OF CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES COMMITTED BY 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Mandatory Punishments.--Section 856(b)(1) of title 10, 
     United States Code (article 56(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice) is amended by striking ``at a minimum'' and 
     all that follows through the period at the end of the 
     paragraph and inserting the following: ``at a minimum except 
     as provided for in section 860 of this title (article 60)--
       ``(A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and
       ``(B) confinement for two years.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of 
     section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) 
     of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by 
     subsection (a), shall apply to offenses specified in 
     paragraph (2) of such section committed on or after the date 
     that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 537. MODIFICATION OF MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE RELATING 
                   TO ADMISSIBILITY OF GENERAL MILITARY CHARACTER 
                   TOWARD PROBABILITY OF INNOCENCE.

       (a) Modification Generally.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     modify the Military Rules of Evidence to clarify that the 
     general military character of an accused is not admissible 
     for the purpose of showing the probability of innocence of 
     the accused, except when evidence of a trait of the military 
     character of an accused is relevant to an element of an 
     offense for which the accused has been charged.
       (b) Revision of Rule 404(a) by Operation of Law.--Effective 
     on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 
     404(a) of the Military Rules of Evidence does not authorize 
     the admissibility of evidence regarding the good military 
     character of an accused in the findings phase of courts-
     martial, except in the instance of the following military-
     specific offenses:
       (1) Article 84 effecting unlawful enlistment, appointment, 
     separation.
       (2) Article 85 desertion.
       (3) Article 86 absent without leave.
       (4) Article 87 missing movement.
       (5) Article 88 contempt towards officials.
       (6) Article 89 disrespect toward superior commissioned 
     officer.
       (7) Article 90 assaulting, willfully disobeying superior 
     commissioned officer.
       (8) Article 91 insubordinate conduct toward warrant, 
     noncommissioned, petty officer.
       (9) Article 92 failure to obey order or regulation.
       (10) Article 93 cruelty and maltreatment of subordinates.
       (11) Article 94 mutiny and sedition.
       (12) Article 95 resisting apprehension, flight, breach of 
     arrest, escape.
       (13) Article 96 releasing a prisoner without proper 
     authority.
       (14) Article 97 unlawful detention.
       (15) Article 98 noncompliance with procedural rules.
       (16) Article 99 misbehavior before enemy.
       (17) Article 100 subordinate compelling surrender.
       (18) Article 101 improper use of countersign.
       (19) Article 102 forcing safeguard.
       (20) Article 103 captured, abandoned property.
       (21) Article 104 aiding the enemy.
       (22) Article 105 misconduct as prisoner.
       (23) Article 106a espionage.
       (24) Article 107 false official statements.
       (25) Article 108 loss, damage, destruction, disposition of 
     military property.
       (26) Article 109 loss, damage, destruction, disposition of 
     property other than military property of the United States.
       (27) Article 110 improper hazarding of vessel.
       (28) Article 111 drunk or reckless operation of vehicle, 
     aircraft, or vessel.
       (29) Article 112 wrongful use, possession, manufacture or 
     introduction of controlled substance.
       (30) Article 113 misbehavior of sentinel or lookout.
       (31) Article 114 dueling.
       (32) Article 115 malingering.
       (33) Article 116 riot.
       (34) Article 117 provoking, speech, gestures.
       (35) Article 133 conduct unbecoming an officer.
       (36) Article 134 general article of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice.
       (37) Attempts, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit such 
     offenses.

     SEC. 538. CONFIDENTIAL REVIEW OF CHARACTERIZATION OF TERMS OF 
                   DISCHARGE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO 
                   ARE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL OFFENSES.

       (a) Confidential Appeal Process Through Boards for 
     Correction of Military Records.--The Secretaries of the 
     military departments shall each establish a confidential 
     process by which an individual who was the victim of a sex-
     related offense during service in the Armed Forces may 
     appeal, through boards for the correction of military records 
     of the military department concerned, the terms or 
     characterization of the discharge or separation of the 
     individual from the Armed Forces on the grounds that the 
     terms or characterization were adversely affected by the 
     individual being the victim of such an offense.
       (b) Consideration of Individual Experiences in Connection 
     With Offenses.--In deciding whether to modify the terms or 
     characterization of an individual's discharge or separation 
     pursuant to the process required by subsection (a), the 
     Secretary of the military department concerned shall instruct 
     boards for the correction of military records to give due 
     consideration to--
       (1) the psychological and physical aspects of the 
     individual's experience in connection with the sex-related 
     offense; and
       (2) what bearing such experience may have had on the 
     circumstances surrounding the individual's discharge or 
     separation from the Armed Forces.
       (c) Preservation of Confidentiality.--Documents considered 
     and decisions rendered pursuant to the process required by 
     subsection (a) shall not be made available to the public, 
     except with the consent of the individual concerned.
       (d) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``sex-related offense'' means any of the following:
       (1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of 
     section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of 
     the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
       (2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of title 10, United 
     States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military 
     Justice).
       (3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 
     (1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of title 10, 
     United States Code (article 80 of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice).

     SEC. 539. CONSISTENT APPLICATION OF RULES OF PRIVILEGE 
                   AFFORDED UNDER THE MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE.

       (a) Elimination of Exception to Psychotherapist-patient 
     Privilege.--Effective on and after the date of the enactment 
     of this Act, the exception granted by subparagraph (d)(8) of 
     Military Rule of Evidence 513 to the privilege afforded to 
     the patient of a psychotherapist to refuse to disclose, and 
     to prevent any other person from disclosing, a confidential 
     communication made between the patient and a psychotherapist 
     or an assistant to the psychotherapist in a case arising 
     under the Uniform Code of Military Justice shall be deemed to 
     no longer apply or exist as a matter of law.
       (b) Conforming Amendment Required.--As soon as practicable 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint 
     Service Committee on Military Justice of the Department of 
     Defense shall amend Military Rule of Evidence 513 to reflect 
     the elimination of the exception referred to in subsection 
     (a) pursuant to such subsection.

                 Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

     SEC. 545. EARLIER DETERMINATION OF DEPENDENT STATUS WITH 
                   RESPECT TO TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR 
                   DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR DEPENDENT 
                   ABUSE.

       Section 1059(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``as of the date on which the individual 
     described in subsection (b) is separated from active duty'' 
     and inserting ``as of the date on which the separation action 
     is initiated by a commander of the individual described in 
     subsection (b)''.

     SEC. 546. IMPROVED CONSISTENCY IN DATA COLLECTION AND 
                   REPORTING IN ARMED FORCES SUICIDE PREVENTION 
                   EFFORTS.

       (a) Policy for Standard Suicide Data Collection, Reporting, 
     and Assessment.--The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a 
     policy for the development of a standard method for 
     collecting, reporting, and assessing suicide data and 
     suicide-attempt data involving members of the Armed Forces, 
     including reserve components thereof, and their dependents in 
     order to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness of--

[[Page 8617]]

       (1) the suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to 
     section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note); 
     and
       (2) the suicide prevention and resilience program for the 
     National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section 
     10219 of title 10, United States Code.
       (b) Submission of Policy and Congressional Briefing.--Not 
     later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the policy 
     developed under subsection (a) to the Committees on Armed 
     Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. At 
     the request of the committees, the Secretary also shall brief 
     such committees on the policy and the implementation status 
     of the standardized suicide data collection, reporting and 
     assessment method.
       (c) Consultation and Implementation.--In the case of the 
     suicide prevention and resilience program for the National 
     Guard and Reserves--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense shall develop the policy 
     required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Chief of 
     the National Guard Bureau; and
       (2) the adjutants general of the States, the Commonwealth 
     of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the 
     Virgin Islands shall implement the policy within 180 days 
     after the date of the submission of the policy under 
     subsection (b).
       (d) Dependent Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``dependent'', with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, 
     means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10, 
     United States Code, except that, in the case of a parent or 
     parent-in-law of the member, the income requirements of 
     subparagraph (E) of such section do not apply.

     SEC. 547. PROTECTION OF CHILD CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS FOR 
                   PARENTS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Child Custody Protection.--Title II of the 
     Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 208. CHILD CUSTODY PROTECTION.

       ``(a) Restriction on Temporary Custody Order.--If a court 
     renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a 
     child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment 
     of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall 
     require that, upon the return of the servicemember from 
     deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately 
     preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the 
     court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best 
     interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be 
     subject to subsection (b).
       ``(b) Limitation on Consideration of Member's Deployment in 
     Determination of Child's Best Interest.--If a motion or a 
     petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the 
     custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may 
     consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of 
     deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole 
     factor in determining the best interest of the child.
       ``(c) No Federal Jurisdiction or Right of Action or 
     Removal.--Nothing in this section shall create a Federal 
     right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal 
     jurisdiction or create a right of removal.
       ``(d) Preemption.--In any case where State law applicable 
     to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as 
     contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of 
     protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying 
     servicemember than the rights provided under this section 
     with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court 
     shall apply the higher State standard.
       ``(e) Deployment Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `deployment' means the movement or mobilization of a 
     servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 
     days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or 
     permanent official orders--
       ``(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;
       ``(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or
       ``(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family 
     members to that location.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 
     1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items 
     relating to title II the following new item:

``208. Child custody protection.''.

            Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities

     SEC. 551. AUTHORIZED DURATION OF FOREIGN AND CULTURAL 
                   EXCHANGE ACTIVITIES AT MILITARY SERVICE 
                   ACADEMIES.

       (a) United States Military Academy.--Section 4345a(a) of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``two 
     weeks'' and inserting ``four weeks''.
       (b) Naval Academy.--Section 6957b(a) of such title is 
     amended by striking ``two weeks'' and inserting ``four 
     weeks''.
       (c) Air Force Academy.--Section 9345a(a) of such title is 
     amended by striking ``two weeks'' and inserting ``four 
     weeks''.

     SEC. 552. PILOT PROGRAM TO ASSIST MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
                   IN OBTAINING POST-SERVICE EMPLOYMENT.

       (a) Program Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     conduct the program described in subsection (c) to enhance 
     the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job 
     placement assistance and related employment services to 
     eligible members of the Armed Forces described in subsection 
     (b) for the purposes of--
       (1) assisting such members in obtaining post-service 
     employment; and
       (2) reducing the amount of ``Unemployment Compensation for 
     Ex-Servicemembers'' that the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating pays into the Unemployment Trust Fund.
       (b) Eligible Members.--Employment services provided under 
     the program are limited to members of the Armed Forces, 
     including members of the reserve components, who are being 
     separated from the Armed Forces or released from active duty.
       (c) Evaluation of Use of Civilian Employment Staffing 
     Agencies.--
       (1) Program described.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     execute a program to evaluate the feasibility and cost-
     effectiveness of utilizing the services of civilian 
     employment staffing agencies to assist eligible members of 
     the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment.
       (2) Program management.--The program required by this 
     subsection shall be managed by an civilian organization (in 
     this section referred to as the ``program manager'') whose 
     principal members have experience--
       (A) administering pay-for-performance programs; and
       (B) within the employment staffing industry.
       (3) Exclusion.--The program manager may not be a staffing 
     agency.
       (d) Eligible Civilian Employment Staffing Agencies.--The 
     Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the program 
     manager shall establish the eligibility requirements to be 
     used by the program manager for the selection of civilian 
     employment staffing agencies to participate in the program.
       (e) Payment of Staffing Agency Fees.--To encourage 
     employers to employ an eligible member of the Armed Forces 
     under the program, the program manager shall pay a 
     participating civilian employment staffing agency a portion 
     of its agency fee (not to exceed 50 percent above the 
     member's hourly wage). Payment of the agency fee will only be 
     made after the member has been employed and paid by the 
     private sector and the hours worked have been verified by the 
     program manager. The staffing agency shall be paid on a 
     weekly basis only for hours the member worked, but not to 
     exceed a total of 800 hours.
       (f) Oversight Requirements.--In conducting the program, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall establish--
       (1) program monitoring standards; and
       (2) reporting requirements, including the hourly wage for 
     each eligible member of the Armed Forces obtaining employment 
     under the program, the numbers of hours worked during the 
     month, and the number of members who remained employed with 
     the same employer after completing the first 800 hours of 
     employment.
       (g) Limitation on Total Program Obligations.--The total 
     amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense for the program 
     may not exceed $35,000,000 during a fiscal year.
       (h) Reporting Requirements.--
       (1) Report required.--Not later than January 15, 2019, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate 
     congressional committees a report describing the results of 
     the program, particularly whether the program achieved the 
     purposes specified in subsection (a).
       (2) Comparison with other programs.--The report shall 
     include a comparison of the results of the program conducted 
     under this section and the results of other employment 
     assistant programs utilized by the Department of Defense. The 
     comparison shall include the number of members of the Armed 
     Forces obtaining employment through each program and the cost 
     to the Department per member.
       (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means the congressional defense committees, the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
     Transportation of the Senate.
       (i) Duration of Authority.--The authority of the Secretary 
     of Defense to carry out programs under this section expires 
     on September 30, 2018.

               Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

     SEC. 561. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL 
                   EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.

       (a) Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of 
     Military Dependent Students.--Of the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and 
     available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide 
     activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, 
     $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of 
     providing assistance to local educational agencies under 
     subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-163; 
     20 U.S.C. 7703b).
       (b) Local Educational Agency Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``local educational agency'' has the meaning given that 
     term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary 
     Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

     SEC. 562. AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY NON-UNITED STATES CITIZENS AS 
                   TEACHERS IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS 
                   DEPENDENTS' SCHOOL SYSTEM.

       Section 2(2)(A) of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers 
     Pay and Personnel Practices Act (20 U.S.C. 901(2)(A)) is 
     amended by inserting

[[Page 8618]]

     before the comma at the end the following: ``or, in the case 
     of a teaching position that involves instruction in the host-
     nation language, a local national when a citizen of the 
     United States is not reasonably available to provide such 
     instruction''.

     SEC. 563. EXPANSION OF FUNCTIONS OF THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON 
                   DEPENDENTS' EDUCATION TO INCLUDE DOMESTIC 
                   DEPENDENT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS.

       (a) Expansion of Functions.--Subsection (c) of section 1411 
     of the Defense Dependents' Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 
     929) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, and of the domestic 
     dependent elementary and secondary school system established 
     under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code,'' after 
     ``of the defense dependents' education system''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and in the domestic 
     dependent elementary and secondary school system'' before the 
     comma at the end.
       (b) Membership of Council.--Subsection (a)(1)(B) of such 
     section is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``and the domestic dependent elementary 
     and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title 
     10, United States Code'' after ``the defense dependents' 
     education system''; and
       (2) by inserting ``either'' before ``such system''.

     SEC. 564. SUPPORT FOR EFFORTS TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT 
                   AND TRANSITION OF MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.

       The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit 
     organizations that provide services to improve the academic 
     achievement of military dependent students, including those 
     nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the 
     civic responsibility of military dependent students and their 
     understanding of the Federal Government through direct 
     exposure to the operations of the Federal Government.

     SEC. 565. AMENDMENTS TO THE IMPACT AID IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 
                   2012.

       Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1748; 20 
     U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``4-year''; and
       (B) by inserting before the period at the end the 
     following, ``, except that amendment made by subsection (b) 
     to subparagraph (B) of section 8002(b)(3) of the Elementary 
     and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) 
     shall be effective for a 2-year period beginning on the date 
     of enactment of this Act''; and
       (2) in paragraph (4)--
       (A) by striking ``The amendments'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(A) In general.--The amendments'';
       (B) by inserting ``and subparagraph (B) of this paragraph'' 
     after ``subsection (b)'';
       (C) by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``4-year'';
       (D) by inserting ``and such subparagraph'' after ``such 
     subsection'' each place it appears; and
       (E) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Special rule.--For the period beginning January 3, 
     2015, and ending January 2, 2017, subparagraph (B) of section 
     8002(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
     1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
       ```(B) Special rule.--In the case of Federal property 
     eligible under this section that is within the boundaries of 
     two or more local educational agencies that are eligible 
     under this section, any of such agencies may ask the 
     Secretary to calculate (and the Secretary shall calculate) 
     the taxable value of the eligible Federal property that is 
     within its boundaries by--
       ```(i) first calculating the per-acre value of the eligible 
     Federal property separately for each eligible local 
     educational agency that shares the Federal property, as 
     provided in subparagraph (A)(ii);
       ```(ii) then averaging the resulting per-acre values of the 
     eligible Federal property from each eligible local 
     educational agency that shares the Federal property; and
       ```(iii) then applying the average per-acre value to 
     determine the total taxable value of the eligible Federal 
     property under subparagraph (A)(iii) for the requesting local 
     educational agency.'.''.

                   Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

     SEC. 571. MEDALS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND CIVILIAN 
                   EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WHO WERE 
                   KILLED OR WOUNDED IN AN ATTACK INSPIRED OR 
                   MOTIVATED BY A FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.

       (a) Purple Heart.--
       (1) Award.--
       (A) In general.--Chapter 57 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in 
       attacks inspired or motivated by foreign terrorist 
       organizations

       ``(a) In General.--For purposes of the award of the Purple 
     Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the 
     armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner 
     as a member who is killed or wounded as a result of an 
     international terrorist attack against the United States.
       ``(b) Covered Members.--A member described in this 
     subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or 
     wounded in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign 
     terrorist organization in circumstances where the death or 
     wound is the result of an attack targeted on the member due 
     to such member's status as a member of the armed forces, 
     unless the death or wound is the result of willful misconduct 
     of the member.
       ``(c) Foreign Terrorist Organization Defined.--In this 
     section, the term `foreign terrorist organization' means an 
     entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the 
     Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration 
     and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).''.
       (B) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting 
     after the item relating to section 1129 the following new 
     item:

``1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks inspired or 
              motivated by foreign terrorist organizations.''.

       (2) Retroactive effective date and application.--
       (A) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
     shall take effect as of September 11, 2001.
       (B) Review of certain previous incidents.--The Secretaries 
     concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding 
     of a member of the Armed Forces that occurred between 
     September 11, 2001, and the date of the enactment of this Act 
     under circumstances that could qualify as being the result of 
     an attack described in section 1129a of title 10, United 
     States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), to determine whether 
     the death or wounding qualifies as a death or wounding 
     resulting an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign 
     terrorist organization for purposes of the award of the 
     Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added).
       (C) Actions following review.--If the death or wounding of 
     a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B) 
     is determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting 
     from an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist 
     organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, 
     United States Code (as so added), the Secretary concerned 
     shall take appropriate action under such section to award the 
     Purple Heart to the member.
       (D) Secretary concerned defined.--In this paragraph, the 
     term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given that term 
     in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.
       (b) Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of 
     Freedom.--
       (1) Review of the november 5, 2009, attack at fort hood, 
     texas.--If the Secretary concerned determines, after a review 
     under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the attack that occurred 
     at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the death or 
     wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack 
     qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack 
     inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization as 
     described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code 
     (as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall 
     make a determination as to whether the death or wounding of 
     any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or 
     civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility 
     criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for 
     the Defense of Freedom.
       (2) Award.--If the Secretary of Defense determines under 
     paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any civilian 
     employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor 
     in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 
     5, 2009, meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the 
     Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, the 
     Secretary shall take appropriate action to award the 
     Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the 
     employee or contractor.

     SEC. 572. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

       (a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of 
     the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of 
     the Army Letter 600-05-1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person 
     who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat 
     during which the person personally engaged, or was personally 
     engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning 
     on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the 
     date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity 
     for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary 
     determines that the person has not been previously recognized 
     in an appropriate manner for such participation.
       (b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action 
     Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action 
     Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge 
     directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least 
     substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to 
     carry out this section.

     SEC. 573. REPORT ON NAVY REVIEW, FINDINGS, AND ACTIONS 
                   PERTAINING TO MEDAL OF HONOR NOMINATION OF 
                   MARINE CORPS SERGEANT RAFAEL PERALTA.

       Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 
     Representatives a report describing the Navy review, 
     findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor 
     nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The 
     report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard 
     to the case.

[[Page 8619]]



            Subtitle I--Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements

     SEC. 581. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REVIEW AND REPORT ON 
                   PREVENTION OF SUICIDE AMONG MEMBERS OF UNITED 
                   STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES.

       (a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense, acting 
     through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
     Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special 
     Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, shall conduct a review 
     of Department of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of 
     suicide among members of United States Special Operations 
     Forces and their dependents.
       (b) Consultation.--In conducting the review under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, 
     and consider the recommendations of, the Office of Suicide 
     Prevention, the Secretaries of the military departments, the 
     Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low 
     Intensity Conflict, and the United States Special Operations 
     Command regarding the feasibility of implementing, for 
     members of United States Special Operations Forces and their 
     dependents, particular elements of the Department of Defense 
     suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 533 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) and section 582 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (Public Law 112-239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
       (c) Elements of Review.--The review conducted under 
     subsection (a) shall specifically include an assessment of 
     each of the following:
       (1) Current Armed Forces and United States Special 
     Operations Command policy guidelines on the prevention of 
     suicide among members of United States Special Operations 
     Forces and their dependents.
       (2) Current and direct Armed Forces and United States 
     Special Operations Command suicide prevention programs and 
     activities for members of United States Special Operations 
     Forces and their dependents, including programs provided by 
     the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide 
     Prevention and programs supporting family members.
       (3) Current Armed Forces and United States Special 
     Operations Command strategies to reduce suicides among 
     members of United States Special Operations Forces and their 
     dependents, including the cost of such strategies across the 
     future years defense program.
       (4) Current Armed Forces and United States Special 
     Operations Command standards of care for suicide prevention 
     among members of United States Special Operations Forces and 
     their dependents, including training standards for behavioral 
     health care providers to ensure that such providers receive 
     training on clinical best practices and evidence-based 
     treatments as information on such practices and treatments 
     becomes available.
       (5) The integration of mental health screenings and suicide 
     risk and prevention efforts for members of United States 
     Special Operations Forces and their dependents into the 
     delivery of primary care for such members and dependents.
       (6) The standards for responding to attempted or completed 
     suicides among members of United States Special Operations 
     Forces and their dependents, including guidance and training 
     to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or 
     completed suicide within their units.
       (7) The standards regarding data collection for individual 
     members of United States Special Operations Forces and their 
     dependents, including related factors such as domestic 
     violence and child abuse.
       (8) The means to ensure the protection of privacy of 
     members of United States Special Operations Forces and their 
     dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide 
     prevention.
       (9) The need to differentiate members of United States 
     Special Operations Forces and their dependents from members 
     of conventional forces and their dependents in the 
     development and delivery of the Department of Defense suicide 
     prevention program.
       (10) Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense 
     considers appropriate in connection with the prevention of 
     suicide among members of United States Special Operations 
     Forces and their dependents.
       (d) Submission of Report.--Not later than 90 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing 
     the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).

     SEC. 582. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   REVIEW OF SEPARATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES WHO MADE UNRESTRICTED REPORTS OF SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULT.

       (a) Review Required.--The Inspector General of the 
     Department of Defense shall conduct a review--
       (1) to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since 
     January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after 
     making an unrestricted report of sexual assault;
       (2) to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each 
     such separation, including--
       (A) whether the separation was in retaliation for or 
     influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted 
     report of sexual assault; and
       (B) whether the identified member requested an appeal; and
       (3) if an identified member was separated on the grounds of 
     having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine 
     whether the separation was carried out in compliance with 
     Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any other 
     applicable Department of Defense regulations, directives, and 
     policies.
       (b) Submission of Results and Recommendations.--Not later 
     than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
     the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     the House of Representatives the results of the review 
     conducted under subsection (a), including such 
     recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of 
     Defense considers necessary.

     SEC. 583. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF 
                   PERSONNEL RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL 
                   GUARD.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the 
     Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives a report regarding the management of 
     personnel records of members of the National Guard.
       (b) Elements of Report.--In preparing the report under 
     subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall consider, at a 
     minimum, the following:
       (1) The appropriate Federal role and responsibility in the 
     management of the records of National Guard members.
       (2) The extent to which selected States have digitized the 
     records of National Guard members.
       (3) The extent to which those States and Federal agencies 
     have entered into agreements to share the digitized records.
       (4) The extent to which Federal agencies face any 
     constraints in their ability to effectively manage National 
     Guard records.

     SEC. 584. STUDY ON GENDER INTEGRATION IN DEFENSE OPERATION 
                   PLANNING AND EXECUTION.

       (a) Study Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint 
     Chiefs of Staff shall conduct a study concerning the 
     integration of gender into the planning and execution of 
     foreign operations of the Armed Forces at all levels.
       (b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the study under 
     subsection (a), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
     shall--
       (1) identify those elements of defense doctrine, if any, 
     that should be revised to address attention to women and 
     gender;
       (2) evaluate the need for a gender advisor training 
     program, including the length of training, proposed 
     curriculum, and location of training;
       (3) determine how to best equip military leadership to 
     integrate attention to women and gender across all lines of 
     effort;
       (4) determine the extent to which personnel qualified to 
     advise on women and gender are available within the 
     Department of Defense, including development of a billet 
     description for gender advisors; and
       (5) evaluate where to assign gender advisors within 
     operational commands from the strategic to tactical levels, 
     with particular attention paid to assigning advisors to 
     combatant commanders and service chiefs.
       (c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 270 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the 
     Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report containing the results of the 
     study conducted under subsection (a). The report shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.

     SEC. 585. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORT CONTAINING 
                   RESULTS OF REVIEW OF OFFICE OF DIVERSITY 
                   MANAGEMENT AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL 
                   HARASSMENT CASES.

       Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     the House of Representatives a report containing the results 
     of the review conducted pursuant to section 1735 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 
     (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 976).

                       Subtitle J--Other Matters

     SEC. 591. INSPECTION OF OUTPATIENT RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES 
                   OCCUPIED BY RECOVERING SERVICE MEMBERS.

       Section 1662(a) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of 
     Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by 
     striking ``inspected on a semiannual basis for the first two 
     years after the enactment of this Act and annually 
     thereafter'' and inserting ``inspected at least once every 
     two years''.

     SEC. 592. WORKING GROUP ON INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION 
                   SYSTEM.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established within the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint 
     Executive Committee under section 320 of title 38, United 
     States Code, a Working Group (in this section referred to as 
     the ``Working Group'') to evaluate and reform the Integrated 
     Disability Evaluation System of the Department of Defense and 
     the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Working Group shall 
     be established under the Disability Evaluation System Working 
     Group of the Joint Executive Committee.
       (b) Pilot Program.--
       (1) In general.--The Working Group shall carry out a pilot 
     program that will co-locate the services and personnel of the 
     Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs 
     to create an integrated model that continues the

[[Page 8620]]

     improvement of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System 
     process through--
       (A) increased process efficiencies, as determined by the 
     Working Group;
       (B) the creation of a standardized form set described in 
     subsection (c)(3);
       (C) the elimination of redundancies;
       (D) the improvement of existing process timelines of the 
     Integrated Disability Evaluation System;
       (E) increased service member satisfaction; and
       (F) the establishment of an information technology bridging 
     solution described in subsection (c)(4).
       (2) Duration.--The pilot program under paragraph (1) shall 
     be carried for a period not exceeding three years.
       (c) Goals of Pilot Program.--In carrying out the pilot 
     program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall ensure 
     the following:
       (1) The period beginning on the date on which an eligible 
     member begins to participate in the pilot program and ending 
     on the date on which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
     determines the disability rating of the member is not more 
     than 295 days.
       (2) Employees of the Department of Defense and the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs who carry out the pilot 
     program are co-located in the same facility, to the extent 
     practicable, to determine the efficiencies provided by 
     locating services of the Departments in the same location.
       (3) The elimination of redundant forms by creating and 
     using a standardized electronic form set with respect to 
     information that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
     of Veterans Affairs both require for an eligible member 
     participating in the pilot program.
       (4) The establishment of an information technology bridging 
     solution between the existing E-benefits program and the 
     MYIDES dashboard to ensure that both such programs contain 
     the information that is added to the claim of an eligible 
     member participating in the pilot program.
       (5) Using the solution established under paragraph (4), 
     eligible members participating in the pilot program are able 
     to use the existing identification number of the member used 
     by the Department of Defense to--
       (A) automatically track the status of the claim of the 
     member, including with respect to the office of the 
     Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs 
     that is responsible for the evaluation as of the date of 
     accessing such solution; and
       (B) be informed of the estimated timeline of the evaluation 
     of the claim.
       (6) Using the solution established under paragraph (4), the 
     Working Group and the Secretaries may--
       (A) identify the office and employee of the Department of 
     Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs who are 
     responsible for the evaluation of a claim at any given time; 
     and
       (B) track individual employees of the Department of Defense 
     and the Department of Veterans Affairs with respect to 
     statistics measuring quality and accuracy at the case level.
       (7) Eligible members who participate in the pilot program 
     have the opportunity to use an exit survey (approved by the 
     Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs) 
     that informs the Working Group of the satisfaction of the 
     member with respect to the pilot program.
       (d) Eligible Members.--A member of the Armed Forces who is 
     being separated or retired from the Armed Forces for 
     disability under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is eligible to participate in the pilot program under 
     subsection (b) if--
       (1) the member is referred to the Integrated Disability 
     Evaluation System beginning on or after the date of the 
     commencement of the pilot program by the specific medical 
     authority of a military department; and
       (2) the evaluation of the member under the Integrated 
     Disability Evaluation System is processed at the disability 
     rating activity site in Providence, Rhode Island.
       (e) Timeline.--By not later than 120 days after the date of 
     the first meeting of the Working Group, the Working Group 
     shall--
       (1) establish the pilot program under subsection (b); and
       (2) establish standards for the products, software, 
     personnel, approved standardized electronic form set 
     described in subsection (c)(3), and other matters required to 
     carry out the pilot program; and
       (3) identify the security required for the information 
     systems of the pilot program.
       (f) Location.--The pilot program established under 
     subsection (b) shall be located at Walter Reed National 
     Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.
       (g) Cooperation.--
       (1) Assignment.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
     of Veterans Affairs shall assign employees of both 
     Departments to the location specified in subsection (f) 
     during the period in which the pilot program is carried out.
       (2) Prioritization.--As determined appropriate by the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint 
     Executive Committee, employees of the Veterans Benefits 
     Administration who rate claims for disability may be assigned 
     to the pilot program under subsection (b) in a sufficient 
     number to ensure that claims for disability that are approved 
     are processed--
       (A) for proposed rating decision not later than 15 days 
     after such approval; and
       (B) for notification of benefits and authorization of award 
     not later than 30 days after separation from the Armed 
     Forces.
       (h) Treatment in Current IDES.--If an eligible member who 
     is participating in the pilot program under subsection (b) 
     elects to instead participate in the Integrated Disability 
     Evaluation System, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
     of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate the eligible member under 
     the Integrated Disability Evaluation System by recognizing 
     the date of the original claim of the member and without any 
     penalty with respect to the priority of the member in such 
     system.
       (i) Reports.--
       (1) Quarterly reports.--During each 90-day period during 
     the period in which the Working Group carries out the pilot 
     program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall submit 
     to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans 
     Affairs, and the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of 
     Defense Joint Executive Committee a report on the status of 
     the pilot program. The report shall include--
       (A) the average number of days that an eligible member 
     participates in the pilot program before the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs determines the disability rating of the 
     member;
       (B) the extent to which forms have been eliminated pursuant 
     to subsection (c)(3);
       (C) the extent to which the information technology bridging 
     solution established pursuant to subsection (c)(4) has 
     improved information sharing between the Departments;
       (D) the results of exit surveys described in subsection 
     (c)(7);
       (E) the extent to which employees of the Department of 
     Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been co-
     located in the same facility under the pilot program; and
       (F) the determination of the Working Group, based on data 
     collected during the course of the pilot program, with 
     respect to the feasibility of increasing the efficiency of 
     the program to decrease the number of days of the goal 
     described in subsection (c)(1).
       (2) Submission of quarterly reports.--Not later than 30 
     days after the date on which the Working Group submits a 
     report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees such report.
       (3) Final report.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
     on which the pilot program under subsection (b) is completed, 
     the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, 
     the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of 
     Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive 
     Committee a report on the pilot program, including an 
     analysis of the pilot program and any recommendations 
     regarding whether the pilot program should be expanded.
       (4) Submission of final report.--Not later than 30 days 
     after the date on which the Working Group submits the report 
     under paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees such report.
       (j) Membership.--
       (1) Number and appointment.--The Working Group shall be 
     composed of 15 members appointed by the Department of 
     Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive 
     Committee from among individuals who have subject matter 
     expertise or other relevant experience in government, the 
     private sector, or academia regarding--
       (A) health care;
       (B) medical records;
       (C) logistics;
       (D) information technology; or
       (E) other relevant subjects.
       (2) Disqualification.--An individual may not be appointed 
     to the Working Group if the individual has served on the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint 
     Executive Committee or any working group thereof.
       (3) Employees of departments.--Not more than a total of 
     four individuals who are employed by either the Department of 
     Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be 
     appointed to the Working Group to ensure that the 
     efficiencies and best practices of the pilot program do not 
     violate the policies of the Departments. Such an individual 
     who is appointed may not serve as chairman of the Working 
     Group or serve in any other supervisory or leadership role.
       (4) Advisors.--The Working Group shall seek advice from 
     experts from nongovernmental organizations (including 
     veterans service organizations, survivors of members of the 
     Armed Forces or veterans, and military organizations), the 
     Internet technology industry, private sector hospital 
     administrators, and other entities the Working Group 
     determines appropriate.
       (5) Chairman.--Except as provided by paragraph (3), the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint 
     Executive Committee shall designate a member of the Working 
     Group to serve as chairman of the Working Group.
       (6) Period of appointment.--Members of the Working Group 
     shall be appointed for the life of the Working Group. A 
     vacancy shall not affect its powers.
       (7) Vacancy.--A vacancy on the Working Group shall be 
     filled in the manner in which the original appointment was 
     made.
       (8) Appointment deadline.--The appointment of members of 
     the Working Group established in this section shall be made 
     not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act.
       (9) Compensation of members.--Each member of the Working 
     Group who is not an officer or employee of the United States 
     shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent

[[Page 8621]]

     of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV of 
     the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United 
     States Code, for each day (including travel time) during 
     which the member is engaged in the performance of the duties 
     of the Working Group. All members of the Working Group who 
     are officers or employees of the United States shall serve 
     without compensation in addition to that received for their 
     services as officers or employees of the United States.
       (k) Meetings.--
       (1) Initial meeting.--The Working Group shall hold its 
     first meeting not later than 15 days after the date on which 
     a majority of the members are appointed.
       (2) Minimum number of meetings.--The Working Group shall 
     meet not less than twice each year regarding the pilot 
     program under subsection (b), including the progress, status, 
     implementation, and execution of the pilot program.
       (l) Termination of Working Group.--The Working Group shall 
     terminate on the date on which the Working Group submits the 
     report under subsection (i)(3).
       (m) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
     the following:
       (A) The Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives and the Senate.
       (B) The Committees on Armed Services of the House of 
     Representatives and the Senate.
       (2) The term ``Integrated Disability Evaluation System'' 
     means the disability evaluation system used jointly by the 
     Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

     SEC. 593. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FULFILLING PROMISE TO 
                   LEAVE NO MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES UNACCOUNTED 
                   IN AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) The United States is a country of great honor and 
     integrity.
       (2) The United States has made a sacred promise to members 
     of the Armed Forces deployed overseas in defense of the 
     United States that their sacrifice and service will never be 
     forgotten.
       (3) The United States can never thank the proud members of 
     the Armed Forces enough for their sacrifice and service on 
     behalf of the United States.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) abandoning the search efforts for members of the Armed 
     Forces who are missing or captured in the line of duty now or 
     in the future is unacceptable;
       (2) the United States has a responsibility to keep the 
     promises made to members of the Armed Forces deployed 
     overseas in defense of the United States, including the 
     promise of the United States Soldier's Creed and the Warrior 
     Ethos, which state that ``I will never leave a fallen 
     comrade''; and
       (3) while the United States continues to transition 
     leadership roles in combat operations in Afghanistan to the 
     people of Afghanistan, the United States must continue to 
     fulfill these important promises to any member of the Armed 
     Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a result of 
     service in Afghanistan now or in the future.

          TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

                     Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

     SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY 
                   INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR 
                   HOUSING UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

       Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2015''.

     SEC. 602. NO FISCAL YEAR 2015 INCREASE IN BASIC PAY FOR 
                   GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS.

       Section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be 
     applied for rates of basic pay payable for commissioned 
     officers in the uniformed services in pay grades O-7 through 
     O-10 during calendar year 2015 by using the rate of pay for 
     level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014.

           Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

     SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2015'':
       (1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve 
     reenlistment bonus.
       (2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve 
     affiliation or enlistment bonus.
       (3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted 
     members assigned to certain high-priority units.
       (4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve 
     enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
       (5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 
     and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
       (6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve 
     enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior 
     service.
       (7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel 
     expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal 
     commuting distance.
       (8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments 
     for reserve component members experiencing extended and 
     frequent mobilization for active duty service.

     SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS.

       (a) Title 10 Authorities.--The following sections of title 
     10, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December 
     31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015'':
       (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer 
     candidate accession program.
       (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education 
     loans for certain health professionals who serve in the 
     Selected Reserve.
       (b) Title 37 Authorities.--The following sections of title 
     37, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December 
     31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015'':
       (1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention 
     bonuses for psychologists.
       (2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for 
     registered nurses.
       (3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay 
     for nurse anesthetists.
       (4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected 
     Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime 
     specialties.
       (5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for 
     dental officers.
       (6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for 
     pharmacy officers.
       (7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for 
     medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
       (8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental 
     specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

     SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2015'':
       (1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-
     qualified officers extending period of active service.
       (2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession 
     bonus.
       (3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual 
     incentive bonus.

     SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 
                   37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND 
                   BONUS AUTHORITIES.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2015'':
       (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for 
     enlisted members.
       (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for 
     officers.
       (3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive 
     pay authorities for nuclear officers.
       (4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive 
     pay and bonus authorities for officers.
       (5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive 
     pay authorities for officers in health professions.
       (6) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for 
     cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve 
     Officers' Training Corps.
       (7) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
       (8) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special 
     duty pay.
       (9) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or 
     proficiency bonus.
       (10) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for 
     members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to 
     high priority units.

     SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO 
                   PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL 
                   PAYS.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2015'':
       (1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention 
     bonus.
       (2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
       (3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for 
     active members.
       (4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
       (5) Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members 
     of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language 
     proficiency.
       (6) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new 
     officers in critical skills.
       (7) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for 
     conversion to military occupational specialty to ease 
     personnel shortage.
       (8) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for 
     transfer between branches of the Armed Forces.
       (9) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer 
     candidates.

                 Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation

     SEC. 621. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS FOR THE PROVISION 
                   OF RELOCATION SERVICES.

       The Secretary of Defense may authorize the commander of a 
     military base to enter into a contract with an appropriate 
     entity for the provision of relocation services to members of 
     the Armed Forces.

    Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 
                        Benefits and Operations

     SEC. 631. AUTHORITY OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES 
                   TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS WITH OTHER FEDERAL 
                   AGENCIES AND INSTRUMENTALITIES TO PROVIDE AND 
                   OBTAIN CERTAIN GOODS AND SERVICES.

       Section 2492 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     striking ``Federal department,

[[Page 8622]]

     agency, or instrumentality'' and all that follows through the 
     period at the end of the section and inserting the following: 
     ``Federal department, agency, or instrumentality--
       ``(1) to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to 
     the efficient management and operation of the exchange system 
     or that morale, welfare, and recreation system; or
       ``(2) to provide or obtain food services beneficial to the 
     efficient management and operation of the dining facilities 
     on military installations offering food services to members 
     of the armed forces.''.

     SEC. 632. REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT, FOOD, AND PRICING OPTIONS FOR 
                   DEFENSE COMMISSARY SYSTEM.

       (a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent 
     organization experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the 
     defense commissary system to determine the qualitative and 
     quantitative effects of--
       (1) using variable pricing in commissary stores to reduce 
     the expenditure of appropriated funds to operate the defense 
     commissary system;
       (2) implementing a program to make available more private 
     label products in commissary stores;
       (3) converting the defense commissary system to a 
     nonappropriated fund instrumentality, and
       (4) eliminating or at least reducing second-destination 
     funding.
       (b) Additional Elements of Review.--The review required by 
     this section also shall consider the following:
       (1) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense 
     commissary system on commissary patrons, in particular junior 
     enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, 
     that would result from displacing current value and name-
     brand products with private-label products.
       (2) The sensitivity of commissary patrons to pricing 
     changes.
       (3) The feasibility of generating net revenue from pricing 
     and stock assortment changes.
       (4) The relationship of higher prices and reduced patron 
     savings to patron usage and accompanying sales, both on a 
     national and regional basis.
       (5) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense 
     commissary system on industry support; such as vendor 
     stocking, promotions, discounts, and merchandising activities 
     and programs.
       (6) The ability of the current commissary management and 
     information technology systems to accommodate changes to the 
     existing pricing and management structure.
       (7) The product category management systems and expertise 
     of the Defense Commissary Agency.
       (8) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense 
     commissary system on military exchanges and other morale, 
     welfare, and recreation programs for members of the Armed 
     Forces.
       (9) The identification of management and legislative 
     changes that would be required in connection with changes to 
     the defense commissary system.
       (10) An estimate of the time required to implement 
     recommended changes to the current pricing and management 
     model of the defense commissary system.
       (c) Submission.--Not later than February 1, 2015, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 
     Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a 
     report containing the results of the review required by this 
     section.

     SEC. 633. RESTRICTION ON IMPLEMENTING ANY NEW DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE POLICY TO LIMIT, RESTRICT, OR BAN THE 
                   SALE OF CERTAIN ITEMS ON MILITARY 
                   INSTALLATIONS.

       The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the 
     military departments may not take any action to implement any 
     new policy that would limit, restrict, or ban the sale of any 
     legal consumer product category sold as of January 1, 2014, 
     in the defense commissary system or exchange stores system on 
     any military installation, domestically or overseas, or on 
     any Department of Defense vessel at sea.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

     SEC. 641. ANONYMOUS SURVEY OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
                   REGARDING THEIR PREFERENCES FOR MILITARY PAY 
                   AND BENEFITS.

       (a) Survey Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry 
     out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces 
     regarding military pay and benefits for the purpose of 
     soliciting information on the following:
       (1) The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the 
     following forms of compensation relative to one another:
       (A) Basic pay.
       (B) Allowances for housing and subsistence.
       (C) Bonuses and special pays.
       (D) Dependent healthcare benefits.
       (E) Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old.
       (F) Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees.
       (G) Retirement pay.
       (2) How the members value different levels of pay or 
     benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles 
     on the value of benefits.
       (3) Any other issues related to military pay and benefits 
     as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
       (4) How information collected pursuant to a previous 
     paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and such 
     other factors as the Secretary of Defense considers 
     appropriate.
       (b) Submission of Results.--Not later than March 1, 2015, 
     the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make 
     publicly available a report containing the results of the 
     survey, including both the analyses and the raw data 
     collected.

                   TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

           Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits

     SEC. 701. MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES.

       (a) In General.--Section 1074m of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
       (A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as 
     subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
       ``(B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member 
     is deployed.''; and
       (2) in subsection (c)(1)(A)--
       (A) in clause (i), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
     semicolon;
       (B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
       (C) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
       ``(ii) by personnel in deployed units whose 
     responsibilities include providing unit health care services 
     if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel 
     for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such 
     personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended by striking ``subparagraph (B) 
     and (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (C) and (D)''.

     SEC. 702. CLARIFICATION OF PROVISION OF FOOD TO FORMER 
                   MEMBERS AND DEPENDENTS NOT RECEIVING INPATIENT 
                   CARE IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES.

       Section 1078b of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``A member'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``A member or former member''; and
       (2) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking ``member or 
     dependent'' and inserting ``member, former member, or 
     dependent''.

                 Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

     SEC. 711. COOPERATIVE HEALTH CARE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE 
                   MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND NON-MILITARY HEALTH 
                   CARE ENTITIES.

       Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 
     2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary of Defense'' 
     and inserting ``Secretary concerned'';
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) by striking ``Secretary shall'' and inserting 
     ``Secretary concerned shall'';
       (B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``if the Secretary 
     establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense'' 
     before the semicolon; and
       (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or the military 
     department concerned'' after ``the Department of Defense''; 
     and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(e) Secretary Concerned Defined.--In this section, the 
     term `Secretary concerned' means--
       ``(1) the Secretary of a military department; or
       ``(2) the Secretary of Defense.''.

     SEC. 712. SURVEYS ON CONTINUED VIABILITY OF TRICARE STANDARD 
                   AND TRICARE EXTRA.

       Section 711(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended in the 
     matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
       (1) by striking ``on a biennial basis''; and
       (2) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting the 
     following: ``paragraph (1) during 2017 and 2020, and at such 
     others times as requested by such committees or as the 
     Comptroller General determines appropriate''.

     SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON TRANSFER OR ELIMINATION OF GRADUATE 
                   MEDICAL EDUCATION BILLETS.

       The Secretary of Defense may not transfer or eliminate a 
     graduate medical education billet from the military medical 
     treatment facility to which the billet is assigned as of the 
     date of the enactment of this Act unless the Secretary--
       (1) conducts a Department-wide review of the implementation 
     of the plan required by section 731 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     10 U.S.C. 1071 note) that is based on not less than two years 
     of carrying out such implementation;
       (2) conducts an examination of the most successful 
     incentives for recruiting and retaining medical professionals 
     to participate in the graduate medical education programs of 
     the military departments;
       (3) determines the assignment of such billets based on the 
     review and examination conducted under paragraphs (1) and 
     (2), respectively; and
       (4) after the Secretary makes the determination under 
     paragraph (3), certifies to the congressional defense 
     committees that any proposed transfer or elimination of such 
     billets--
       (A) meets the needs of the military departments and the 
     patient population; and
       (B) takes into account the assignment interests of the 
     members of the Armed Forces who are participating (or who 
     will participate) in the graduate medical education programs 
     of the military departments.

     SEC. 714. REVIEW OF MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM MODERNIZATION 
                   STUDY.

       (a) Limitation.--

[[Page 8623]]

       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may not 
     restructure or realign a military medical treatment facility 
     until a 120-day period has elapsed following the date on 
     which the Comptroller General of the United States is 
     required to submit to the congressional defense committees 
     the report under subsection (b)(3).
       (2) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report that includes the 
     following:
       (A) During the period from 2001 to 2012, for each military 
     medical treatment facility considered under the modernization 
     study directed by the Resource Management Decision of the 
     Department of Defense numbered MP-D-01--
       (i) the average daily inpatient census;
       (ii) the average inpatient capacity;
       (iii) the top five inpatient admission diagnoses;
       (iv) each medical specialty available;
       (v) the average daily percent of staffing available for 
     each medical specialty;
       (vi) the beneficiary population within the catchment area;
       (vii) the budgeted funding level;
       (viii) whether the facility has a helipad capable of 
     receiving medical evacuation airlift patients arriving on the 
     primary evacuation aircraft platform for the military 
     installation served;
       (ix) a determination of whether the civilian hospital 
     system in which the facility resides is a Federally-
     designated underserved medical community and the effect on 
     such community from any reduction in staff or functions or 
     downgrade of the facility;
       (x) if the facility serves a training center, a 
     determination, made in consultation with the appropriate 
     training directorate, training and doctrine command, and 
     forces command of each military department, of the risk with 
     respect to high tempo, live-fire military operations, and the 
     potential for a mass casualty event if the facility is 
     downgraded to a clinic or reduced in personnel or 
     capabilities;
       (xi) a site assessment by TRICARE to assess the network 
     capabilities of TRICARE providers in the local area;
       (xii) the inpatient mental health availability; and
       (xiii) the average annual inpatient care directed to 
     civilian medical facilities.
       (B) For each military medical treatment facility considered 
     under such modernization study--
       (i) the civilian capacity by medical specialty in each 
     catchment area;
       (ii) the distance in miles to the nearest civilian 
     emergency care department;
       (iii) the distance in miles to the closest civilian 
     inpatient hospital, listed by level of care and whether the 
     facility is designated a sole community hospital;
       (iv) the availability of ambulance service on the military 
     installation and the distance in miles to the nearest 
     civilian ambulance service, including the average response 
     time to the military installation;
       (v) an estimate of the cost to restructure or realign the 
     military medical treatment facility, including with respect 
     to bed closures and civilian personnel reductions; and
       (vi) if the military medical treatment facility is 
     restructured or realigned, an estimate of--

       (I) the number of civilian personnel reductions, listed by 
     series;
       (II) the number of local support contracts terminated; and
       (III) the increased cost of purchased care.

       (C) The results of the study with respect to the 
     recommendations of the Secretary to restructure or realign 
     military medical treatment facilities.
       (b) Comptroller General Review.--
       (1) Review.--The Comptroller General of the United States 
     shall review the report under subsection (a)(2).
       (2) Elements.--The review under paragraph (1) shall include 
     the following:
       (A) An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary 
     of Defense in conducting the study.
       (B) An assessment of the adequacy of the data used by the 
     Secretary with respect to such study.
       (3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date on 
     which the Secretary submits the report under subsection 
     (a)(2), the Comptroller General shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the review under 
     paragraph (1).

                 Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters

     SEC. 721. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 
                   FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND.

       Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2573) is 
     amended by striking ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2016''.

     SEC. 722. DESIGNATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SENIOR MEDICAL 
                   ADVISOR FOR ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME.

       (a) Designation of Senior Medical Advisor.--Subsection (a) 
     of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 
     1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Deputy Director of the 
     TRICARE Management Activity'' and inserting ``Deputy Director 
     of the Defense Health Agency''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Deputy Director of the 
     TRICARE Management Activity'' both places it appears and 
     inserting ``Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency''.
       (b) Clarification of Responsibilities and Duties of Senior 
     Medical Advisor.--Subsection (c)(2) of such section is 
     amended by striking ``health care standards of the Department 
     of Veterans Affairs'' and inserting ``nationally recognized 
     health care standards and requirements''.

     SEC. 723. RESEARCH REGARDING ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE.

       The Secretary of Defense may carry out research, 
     development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to 
     Alzheimer's disease.

     SEC. 724. ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL 
                   STAFFING SERVICES.

       (a) Acquisition Strategy.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop and 
     carry out an acquisition strategy with respect to entering 
     into contracts for the services of health care professional 
     staff at military medical treatment facilities.
       (2) Elements.--The acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) 
     shall include the following:
       (A) Identification of the responsibilities of the military 
     departments and elements of the Department of Defense in 
     carrying out such strategy.
       (B) Methods to analyze, using reliable and detailed data 
     covering the entire Department, the amount of funds expended 
     on contracts for the services of health care professional 
     staff.
       (C) Methods to identify opportunities to consolidate 
     requirements for such services and reduce cost.
       (D) Methods to measure cost savings that are realized by 
     using such contracts instead of purchased care.
       (E) Metrics to determine the effectiveness of such 
     strategy.
       (b) Report.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     on the status of implementing the acquisition strategy under 
     paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including how each element 
     under subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (2) of such 
     subsection are being carried out.

     SEC. 725. PILOT PROGRAM ON MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT 
                   UNDER TRICARE PROGRAM.

       (a) Establishment.--In accordance with section 1092 of 
     title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     carry out a pilot program to evaluate the feasibility and 
     desirability of including medication therapy management as 
     part of the TRICARE program.
       (b) Elements of Pilot Program.--In carrying out the pilot 
     program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure the 
     following:
       (1) Patients who participate in the pilot program are 
     patients who--
       (A) have more than one chronic condition; and
       (B) are prescribed more than one medication.
       (2) Medication therapy management services provided under 
     the pilot program are focused on improving patient use and 
     outcomes of prescription medications.
       (3) The design of the pilot considers best commercial 
     practices in providing medication therapy management 
     services, including practices under the prescription drug 
     program under part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 
     Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-101 et seq.).
       (4) The pilot program includes methods to measure the 
     effect of medication therapy management services on--
       (A) patient use and outcomes of prescription medications; 
     and
       (B) the costs of health care.
       (c) Locations.--
       (1) Selection.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot 
     program under subsection (a) in not less than three 
     locations.
       (2) First location criteria.--Not less than one location 
     selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following 
     criteria:
       (A) The location is a pharmacy at a military medical 
     treatment facility.
       (B) The patients participating in the pilot program at such 
     location generally receive primary care services from health 
     care providers at such facility.
       (3) Second location criteria.--Not less than one location 
     selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following 
     criteria:
       (A) The location is a pharmacy at a military medical 
     treatment facility.
       (B) The patients participating in the pilot program at such 
     location generally do not receive primary care services from 
     health care providers at such facility.
       (4) Third location criterion.--Not less than one location 
     selected under paragraph (1) shall be a pharmacy located at a 
     location other than a military medical treatment facility.
       (d) Duration.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot 
     program under subsection (a) for a period determined 
     appropriate by the Secretary that is not less than two years.
       (e) Report.--Not later than 30 months after the date on 
     which the Secretary commences the pilot program under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the pilot 
     program that includes--
       (1) information on the effect of medication therapy 
     management services on--
       (A) patient use and outcomes of prescription medications; 
     and
       (B) the costs of health care;
       (2) the recommendations of the Secretary with respect to 
     incorporating medication therapy management into the TRICARE 
     program; and
       (3) such other information as the Secretary determines 
     appropriate.

[[Page 8624]]

       (f) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``medication therapy management'' means 
     professional services provided by qualified pharmacists to 
     patients to improve the effective use and outcomes of 
     prescription medications provided to the patients.
       (2) The term ``TRICARE program'' has the meaning given that 
     term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

     SEC. 726. REPORT ON REDUCTION OF PRIME SERVICE AREAS.

       (a) In General.--Section 732 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1816), as amended by section 701 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 
     113-66), is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
     (c) and (d), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsection (b):
       ``(b) Additional Report.--
       ``(1) Implementation.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the status of 
     reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions 
     described in subsection (d)(1)(B).
       ``(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) 
     shall include the following:
       ``(A) Details regarding the impact to affected eligible 
     beneficiaries with respect to the reduction of the 
     availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in 
     subsection (d)(1)(B), including, with respect to each State--
       ``(i) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, as 
     of the date of the report, are enrolled in TRICARE Standard;
       ``(ii) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, 
     as of the date of the report; changed residences to remain 
     eligible for TRICARE Prime in a new region; and
       ``(iii) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, 
     as of the date of the report, have made an election described 
     in subsection (c)(1).
       ``(B) The estimated increase in annual costs per each 
     affected eligible beneficiary counted under subparagraph (A) 
     as compared to the estimated annual costs if a contract 
     described in subsection (a)(2)(A) did not affect the 
     eligibility of the beneficiary for TRICARE Prime.
       ``(C) A description of the efforts of the Secretary to 
     assess--
       ``(i) the impact on access to health care for affected 
     eligible beneficiaries; and
       ``(ii) the satisfaction of such beneficiaries with respect 
     to access to health care under TRICARE Standard.
       ``(D) A description of the estimated cost savings realized 
     by reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions 
     described in subsection (d)(1)(B).''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b)(3)(A) of such 
     section is amended by striking ``subsection (c)(1)(B)'' and 
     inserting ``subsection (d)(1)(B)''.

     SEC. 727. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON TRANSITION OF CARE 
                   FOR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER OR TRAUMATIC 
                   BRAIN INJURY.

       (a) Report.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the Comptroller 
     General of the United States shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees and Committees on Veterans' 
     Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 
     report that assesses the transition of care for post-
     traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) The programs, policies, and regulations that affect the 
     transition of care, particularly with respect to individuals 
     who are taking or have been prescribed antidepressants, 
     stimulants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytic, 
     depressants, or hallucinogens.
       (2) Upon transitioning to care furnished by the Secretary 
     of Veterans Affairs, the extent to which the pharmaceutical 
     treatment plan of an individual changes, and the factors 
     determining such changes.
       (3) The extent to which the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs have worked together to 
     identify and apply best pharmaceutical treatment practices.
       (4) A description of the off-formulary waiver process of 
     the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the extent to which 
     the process is applied efficiently at the treatment level.
       (5) The benefits and challenges of combining the 
     formularies across the Department of Defense and the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs.
       (6) Any other issues that the Comptroller General 
     determines appropriate.
       (c) Transition of Care Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``transition of care'' means the transition of an individual 
     from receiving treatment furnished by the Secretary of 
     Defense to treatment furnished by the Secretary of Veterans 
     Affairs.

     SEC. 728. BRIEFING ON HOSPITALS IN ARREARS IN PAYMENTS TO 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
     and the Senate a briefing on the process used by the Defense 
     Health Agency to collect payments from non-Department of 
     Defense hospitals. Such briefing shall include a list of each 
     hospital that is more than 90 days in arrears in payments to 
     the Secretary, including the amount of arrears (by 30-day 
     increments) for each such hospital.

  TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED 
                                MATTERS

Subtitle A--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, 
                            and Limitations

     SEC. 801. EXTENSION TO UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND 
                   OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROHIBITION ON 
                   CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY.

       Section 831(i)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 813) is 
     amended by inserting ``United States Transportation 
     Command,'' after ``United States Southern Command,''.

     SEC. 802. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCED 
                   COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT OR PROTOTYPE UNITS.

       (a) Extension of Termination.--Subsection (b)(4) of section 
     819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by 
     striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30, 
     2019''.
       (b) Extension of Report Requirement.--Subsection (c) of 
     such section is amended by striking ``March 1, 2013'' and 
     inserting `` March 1, 2018''.

     SEC. 803. AMENDMENT RELATING TO AUTHORITY OF THE DEFENSE 
                   ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY TO CARRY OUT 
                   CERTAIN PROTOTYPE PROJECTS.

       Section 845(a)(1) of Public Law 103-160 (10 U.S.C. 2371 
     note) is amended by striking ``weapons or weapon systems 
     proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of 
     Defense, or to improvement of weapons or weapon systems in 
     use by the Armed Forces'' and inserting the following: 
     ``enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel 
     and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or 
     materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the 
     Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, 
     systems, components, or materials in use by the Armed 
     Forces''.

     SEC. 804. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL AMOUNT 
                   AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES.

       Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489), as 
     amended by section 802 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 804) 
     is further amended--
       (1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ``or 2014'' and 
     inserting ``2014, or 2015'';
       (2) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ``and 2014'' and 
     inserting ``2014, and 2015'';
       (3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``or 2014'' and 
     inserting ``2014, or 2015''; and
       (4) in subsection (e), by striking ``2014'' and inserting 
     ``2015''.

                  Subtitle B--Industrial Base Matters

     SEC. 811. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AND AMENDMENTS TO TEST 
                   PROGRAM FOR NEGOTIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE SMALL 
                   BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLANS.

       (a) Three-year Extension.--Subsection (e) of section 834 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 
     and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking 
     ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2017''.
       (b) Additional Requirements for Comprehensive 
     Subcontracting Plans.--Subsection (b) of section 834 of such 
     Act is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (3)'' and 
     inserting ``paragraph (4)'';
       (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and in 
     that paragraph by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$100,000,000''; and
       (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
     paragraph (3):
       ``(3) Each comprehensive subcontracting plan of a 
     contractor shall require that the contractor report to the 
     Secretary of Defense on a semi-annual basis the following 
     information:
       ``(A) The amount of first-tier subcontract dollars awarded 
     during the six-month period covered by the report to covered 
     small business concerns, with the information set forth 
     separately--
       ``(i) by North American Industrial Classification System 
     code;
       ``(ii) by major defense acquisition program, as defined in 
     section 2430(a) of title 10, United States Code;
       ``(iii) by contract, if the contract is for the 
     maintenance, overhaul, repair, servicing, rehabilitation, 
     salvage, modernization, or modification of supplies, systems, 
     or equipment and the total value of the contract, including 
     options, exceeds $100,000,000; and
       ``(iv) by military department.
       ``(B) The total number of subcontracts active under the 
     test program during the six-month period covered by the 
     report that would have otherwise required a subcontracting 
     plan under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small 
     Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).
       ``(C) Costs incurred in negotiating, complying with, and 
     reporting on comprehensive subcontracting plans.
       ``(D) Costs avoided by adoption of a comprehensive 
     subcontracting plan.
       ``(E) Any other information required by the Department of 
     Defense to complete the study required by subsection (f).''.
       (c) Additional Consequence for Failure to Make Good Faith 
     Effort to Comply.--
       (1) Amendments.--Subsection (d) of section 834 of such Act 
     is amended--
       (A) by striking ``Company-wide'' and inserting 
     ``Comprehensive'' in the heading;

[[Page 8625]]

       (B) by striking ``company-wide'' and inserting 
     ``comprehensive subcontracting''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following: ``In addition, any 
     such failure shall be a factor considered as part of the 
     evaluation of past performance of an offeror.''.
       (2) Repeal of suspension of subsection (d).--Section 402 of 
     Public Law 101-574 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is repealed.
       (d) Additional Report.--
       (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 834(f) of such 
     Act is amended by striking ``March 1, 1994, and March 1, 
     2012'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.
       (2) Correction of reference to committee.--Such paragraph 
     is further amended by striking ``Committees'' and all that 
     follows through the end of such paragraph and inserting the 
     following: ``Committees on Armed Services and on Small 
     Business of the House of Representatives and the Committees 
     on Armed Services and on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 
     of the Senate''.
       (e) Additional Definitions.--
       (1) Covered small business concern.--Subsection (g) of 
     section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows:
       ``(g) Definitions.--In this section, the term `covered 
     small business concern' includes each of the following:
       ``(1) A small business concern, as that term is defined 
     under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
     632(a));
       ``(2) A small business concern owned and controlled by 
     veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(3) of such 
     Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(3)).
       ``(3) A small business concern owned and controlled by 
     service-disabled veterans, as that term is defined in section 
     3(q)(2) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)).
       ``(4) A qualified HUBZone small business concern, as that 
     term is defined under section 3(p)(5) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 
     632(p)(5)).
       ``(5) A small business concern owned and controlled by 
     socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as that 
     term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 
     637(d)(3)(C)).
       ``(6) A small business concern owned and controlled by 
     women, as that term is defined under section 3(n) of such Act 
     (15 U.S.C. 632(n)).''.
       (2) Conforming amendment.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 834 
     of such Act is amended by striking ``small business concerns 
     and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially 
     and economically disadvantaged individuals'' and inserting 
     ``covered small business concerns''.

     SEC. 812. IMPROVING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SERVICE-DISABLED 
                   VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES.

       (a) Small Business Definition of Small Business Concern 
     Consolidated.--Section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 
     U.S.C. 632(q)) is amended--
       (1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
       ``(2) Small business concern owned and controlled by 
     service-disabled veterans.--The term `small business concern 
     owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans' means a 
     small business concern--
       ``(A)(i) not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one 
     or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any 
     publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the 
     stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled 
     veterans; and
       ``(ii) the management and daily business operations of 
     which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans 
     or, in the case of a veteran with permanent and severe 
     disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such 
     veteran; or
       ``(B)(i) not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one 
     or more veterans with service-connected disabilities that are 
     permanent and total who are unable to manage the daily 
     business operations of such concern or, in the case of a 
     publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the 
     stock of which is owned by one or more such veterans; and
       ``(ii) is included in the database described in section 
     8127(f) of title 38, United States Code.''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(6) Treatment of businesses after death of veteran-
     owner.--
       ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (C), if the 
     death of a service-disabled veteran causes a small business 
     concern to be less than 51 percent owned by one or more such 
     veterans, the surviving spouse of such veteran who acquires 
     ownership rights in such small business concern shall, for 
     the period described in subparagraph (B), be treated as if 
     the surviving spouse were that veteran for the purpose of 
     maintaining the status of the small business concern as a 
     small business concern owned and controlled by service-
     disabled veterans.
       ``(B) Period described.--The period referred to in 
     subparagraph (A) is the period beginning on the date on which 
     the service-disabled veteran dies and ending on the earliest 
     of the following dates:
       ``(i) The date on which the surviving spouse remarries.
       ``(ii) The date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes 
     an ownership interest in the small business concern.
       ``(iii) The date that is ten years after the date of the 
     veteran's death.
       ``(C) Application to surviving spouse.--Subparagraph (A) 
     only applies to a surviving spouse of a veteran with a 
     service-connected disability if--
       ``(i) the veteran had a service-connected disability rated 
     as 100 percent disabling or died as a result of a service-
     connected disability; and
       ``(ii) prior to the death of the veteran and during the 
     period in which the surviving spouse seeks to qualify under 
     this paragraph, the small business concern is included in the 
     database described in section 8127(f) of title 38, United 
     States Code.''.
       (b) Veterans Affairs Definition of Small Business Concern 
     Consolidated.--Section 8127 of title 38, United States Code, 
     is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (h); and
       (2) in subsection (l)(2), by striking ``means'' and all 
     that follows through the period at the end and inserting the 
     following: ``has the meaning given that term under section 
     3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)).''.
       (c) SBA to Assume Control of Verification of Ownership and 
     Control Status of Applicants for Inclusion in the Database of 
     Small Businesses Owned and Controlled by Service Disabled 
     Veterans and Veterans.--The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 
     et seq.), as amended by section 815, is further amended by 
     adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 49. VETS FIRST PROGRAM.

       ``In order to increase opportunities for small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans 
     and small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans 
     in the Federal marketplace, not later than 180 days after the 
     effective date of this section, the Administrator shall enter 
     into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs that transfers control and administration of 
     the program under subsections (e) through (g) of section 8127 
     of title 38, United States Code, to the Administrator, 
     consistent with the following:
       ``(1) Not later than 270 days after completing the 
     memorandum of understanding, the Administrator shall make 
     rules to carry out the memorandum. If the Administrator does 
     not make such rules by such date, the Administrator may not 
     exercise the authority under section 7(a)(25)(A) until such 
     time as those rules are made.
       ``(2) The Administrator shall assume authority and 
     responsibility for maintenance and operation of the database 
     and for verifications under the program. Any verifications 
     undertaken by the Administrator shall employ fraud prevention 
     measures at the time of the initial application, through 
     detection and monitoring processes after initial acceptance, 
     by investigating allegations of potential fraud, removing 
     firms that do not quality from the database, and referring 
     cases for prosecution when appropriate.
       ``(3) Any appeal by a small business concern, at the time 
     that verification is denied or a contract is awarded, of any 
     determination under the program shall be heard by the Office 
     of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration.
       ``(4)(A) The Secretary shall, for a period of 6 years 
     commencing on a date agreed to in the completed memorandum, 
     reimburse to the Administrator of the Small Business 
     Administration any costs incurred by the Administrator for 
     actions undertaken pursuant to the memorandum from fees 
     collected by the Secretary of Veteran Affairs under multiple-
     award schedule contracts. The Administrator and the Secretary 
     shall endeavor to ensure maximum efficiency in such actions. 
     Any disputes between the Secretary and the Administrator 
     shall be resolved by the Director of the Office of Management 
     and Budget.
       ``(B) The Secretary and the Administrator may extend the 
     term of the memorandum of understanding, except for the 
     reimbursement requirement under subparagraph (A). The 
     Secretary and the Administrator may in a separate memorandum 
     of understanding provide for an extension of such 
     reimbursement.
       ``(5) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
     of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary 
     and the Administrator shall--
       ``(A) meet to discuss ways to improve collaboration under 
     the memorandum to increase opportunities for service-disabled 
     veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small 
     businesses; and
       ``(B) consult with congressionally chartered Veterans 
     Service Organizations to discuss ways to increase 
     opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned small 
     businesses and veteran-owned small businesses.
       ``(6) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
     of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary 
     and the Administrator shall report to the Committee on Small 
     Business and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the House 
     of Representatives, and the Committee on Small Business and 
     Entrepreneurship and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of 
     the Senate on the progress made by the Secretary and the 
     Administrator implementing this section.
       ``(7) In any meeting required under paragraph (5), the 
     Secretary and the Administrator shall include in the 
     discussion of ways to improve collaboration under the 
     memorandum to increase opportunities for small businesses 
     owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans who are 
     women or minorities and small business concerns owned and 
     controlled by veterans who are women or minorities.''.
       (d) Memorandum of Understanding.--Section 8127(f) of title 
     38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(7) Not later than 180 days after the effective date of 
     this paragraph, the Secretary shall enter into a memorandum 
     of understanding with the

[[Page 8626]]

     Administrator of the Small Business Administration consistent 
     with section 48 of the Small Business Act, which shall 
     specify the manner in which the Secretary shall notify the 
     Administrator as to whether an individual is a veteran and if 
     that veteran has a service-connected disability.''.

     SEC. 813. PLAN FOR IMPROVING DATA ON BUNDLED AND CONSOLIDATED 
                   CONTRACTS.

       Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(s) Data Quality Improvement Plan.--
       ``(1) In general.--Not later than the first day of fiscal 
     year 2016, the Administrator of the Small Business 
     Administration, in consultation with the Small Business 
     Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal 
     Procurement Policy, and the Administrator of the General 
     Services Administration shall develop a plan to improve the 
     quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated 
     contracts in the Federal procurement data system.
       ``(2) Plan requirements.--The plan shall--
       ``(A) describe the roles and responsibilities of the 
     Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the 
     Directors of the Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business 
     Utilization, the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, 
     the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the 
     Administrator of the General Services Administration, the 
     senior procurement executives, and Chief Acquisition Officers 
     in implementing the plan described in paragraph (1) and 
     contributing to the annual report required by subsection 
     (p)(4);
       ``(B) make necessary changes to policies and procedures on 
     proper identification and mitigation of contract bundling and 
     consolidation, and to training procedures of relevant 
     personnel on proper identification and mitigation of contract 
     bundling and consolidation;
       ``(C) establish consequences for failure to properly 
     identify contracts as bundled or consolidated;
       ``(D) establish requirements for periodic and statistically 
     valid data verification and validation; and
       ``(E) assign clear data verification responsibilities.
       ``(3) Committee briefing.--Once finalized and by not later 
     than 90 days prior to implementation, the plan described in 
     this subsection shall be presented to the Committee on Small 
     Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
     Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate.
       ``(4) Implementation.--Not later than the first day of 
     fiscal year 2017, the Administrator of the Small Business 
     Administration shall implement the plan described in this 
     subsection.
       ``(5) Certification.--The Administrator shall annually 
     provide to the Committee on Small Business of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and 
     Entrepreneurship of the Senate certification of the accuracy 
     and completeness of data reported on bundled and consolidated 
     contracts.
       ``(6) GAO study and report.--
       ``(A) Study.--Not later than the first day of fiscal year 
     2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 
     initiate a study on the effectiveness of the plan described 
     in this subsection that shall assess whether contracts were 
     accurately labeled as bundled or consolidated.
       ``(B) Contracts evaluated.--For the purposes of conducting 
     the study described in subparagraph (A), the Comptroller 
     General of the United States--
       ``(i) shall evaluate, for work in each of sectors 23, 33, 
     54, and 56 (as defined by the North American Industry 
     Classification System), not fewer than 100 contracts in each 
     sector;
       ``(ii) shall evaluate only those contracts--

       ``(I) awarded by an agency listed in section 901(b) of 
     title 31, United States Code; and
       ``(II) that have a Base and Exercised Options Value, an 
     Action Obligation, or a Base and All Options Value exceeding 
     $10,000,000; and

       ``(iii) shall not evaluate contracts that have used any set 
     aside authority.
       ``(C) Report.--Not later than 12 months after initiating 
     the study required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller 
     General of the United States shall report to the Committee on 
     Small Business of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the 
     Senate on the results from such study and, if warranted, any 
     recommendations on how to improve the quality of data 
     reported on bundled and consolidated contracts.
       ``(7) Definitions.--In this subsection the following 
     definitions shall apply:
       ``(A) Chief acquisition officer; senior procurement 
     executive.--The terms `Chief Acquisition Officer' and `senior 
     procurement executive' have the meanings given such terms in 
     section 44 of this Act.
       ``(B) Federal procurement data system definitions.--The 
     terms `Base and Exercised Options Value', `Action 
     Obligation', `Base and All Options Value', and `set aside 
     authority' have the meanings given such terms by the 
     Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in the Federal 
     procurement data system on October 1, 2013, or subsequent 
     equivalent terms.''.

     SEC. 814. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE EDUCATION TO SMALL BUSINESSES 
                   ON CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF ARMS EXPORT CONTROL 
                   ACT.

       (a) Assistance at Small Business Development Centers.--
     Section 21(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
     648(c)(1)) is amended by inserting at the end the following: 
     ``Applicants receiving grants under this section shall also 
     assist small businesses by providing, where appropriate, 
     education on the requirements applicable to small businesses 
     under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms 
     Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with 
     those requirements.''.
       (b) Procurement Technical Assistance.--Section 2418 of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
     the following new subsection:
       ``(c) An eligible entity assisted by the Department of 
     Defense under this chapter also may furnish education on the 
     requirements applicable to small businesses under the 
     regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export 
     Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those 
     requirements.''.

     SEC. 815. PROHIBITION ON REVERSE AUCTIONS FOR COVERED 
                   CONTRACTS.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that, 
     when used appropriately, reverse auctions may improve the 
     Federal Government's procurement of commercially available 
     commodities by increasing competition, reducing prices, and 
     improving opportunities for small businesses.
       (b) Use of Reverse Auctions.--The Small Business Act (15 
     U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating section 47 as section 48; and
       (2) by inserting after section 46 the following:

     ``SEC. 47. REVERSE AUCTIONS PROHIBITED FOR COVERED CONTRACTS.

       ``(a) In General.--In the case of a covered contract 
     described in subsection (c), reverse auction methods may not 
     be used--
       ``(1) if the covered contract is suitable for award to a 
     small business concern; or
       ``(2) if the award is to be made under--
       ``(A) section 8(a);
       ``(B) section 8(m);
       ``(C) section 15(a);
       ``(D) section 15(j);
       ``(E) section 31;
       ``(F) section 36; or
       ``(G) section 8127 of title 38, United States Code.
       ``(b) Limitations on Using Reverse Auctions.--
       ``(1) Number of offers; revisions to bids.--A Federal 
     agency may not award a covered contract using a reverse 
     auction method if only one offer is received or if offerors 
     do not have the ability to submit revised bids throughout the 
     course of the auction.
       ``(2) Other procurement authority.--A Federal agency may 
     not award a covered contract under a procurement provision 
     other than those provisions described in subsection (a)(2) if 
     the justification for using such procurement provision is to 
     use reverse auction methods.
       ``(c) Definitions.--In this section the following 
     definitions apply:
       ``(1) Covered contract.--The term `covered contract' means 
     a contract--
       ``(A) for services, including design and construction 
     services; and
       ``(B) for goods in which the technical qualifications of 
     the offeror constitute part of the basis of award.
       ``(2) Design and construction services.--The term `design 
     and construction services' means--
       ``(A) site planning and landscape design;
       ``(B) architectural and interior design;
       ``(C) engineering system design;
       ``(D) performance of construction work for facility, 
     infrastructure, and environmental restoration projects;
       ``(E) delivery and supply of construction materials to 
     construction sites;
       ``(F) construction, alteration, or repair, including 
     painting and decorating, of public buildings and public 
     works; and
       ``(G) architectural and engineering services as defined in 
     section 1102 of title 40, United States Code.
       ``(3) Reverse auction.--The term `reverse auction' means, 
     with respect to procurement by an agency, a real-time auction 
     conducted through an electronic medium between a group of 
     offerors who compete against each other by submitting offers 
     for a contract or task order with the ability to submit 
     revised offers throughout the course of the auction.''.
       (c) Contracts Awarded by Secretary of Veterans Affairs.--
     Section 8127(j) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) The provisions of section 47(a) of the Small Business 
     Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) (relating to the prohibition on 
     using reverse auction methods to award a contract) shall 
     apply to a contract awarded under this section.''.

     SEC. 816. SBA SURETY BOND GUARANTEE.

       Section 411(c)(1) of the Small Business Investment Act of 
     1958 (15 U.S.C. 694b(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``70'' and 
     inserting ``90''.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 821. CERTIFICATION OF EFFECTIVENESS FOR AIR FORCE 
                   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTING.

       (a) Review Required.--The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
     Staff shall conduct a review of the Air Force Network-Centric 
     Solutions II (NETCENTS II) contract to ensure that it can 
     effectively meet the requirements of the joint force when 
     providing time- and task-critical information technology 
     resources for hardware, applications, and services related to 
     the warfighting mission area. The review shall examine--
       (1) the effectiveness of contracting for warfighting 
     mission areas, such as nuclear command and control, space 
     situational awareness, or integrated threat warning, with 
     effectiveness

[[Page 8627]]

     determined by the ability to consistently access domain 
     experts and respond to emerging requirements in a timely 
     manner; and
       (2) the efficiency of contracting for the warfighting 
     mission area, with efficiency measured by the amount of time 
     to get new task orders on contract.
       (b) Certification.--Based on the findings of the review 
     required by subsection (a), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
     of Staff shall provide a certification to the Committees on 
     Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
     that the Air Force's NETCENTS II contract is effective in 
     delivering information technology capabilities for the joint 
     force. In providing this certification, the Chairman of the 
     Joint Chiefs of Staff shall also provide the complete 
     findings of the review required by subsection (a).

     SEC. 822. AIRLIFT SERVICE.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 157 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 2631b. Airlift service

       ``(a) Requirement.--Except as provided in subsections (b) 
     and (c), the transportation of passengers or property by 
     CRAF-eligible aircraft obtained by the Secretary of Defense 
     or the Secretary of a military department through a contract 
     for airlift service may only be provided by a covered air 
     carrier.
       ``(b) Applicability.--The requirement under subsection (a) 
     applies with respect to transportation that is--
       ``(1) interstate in the United States;
       ``(2) between a place in the United States and a place 
     outside the United States; or
       ``(3) between two places outside the United States.
       ``(c) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     the requirement under subsection (a) if the Secretary 
     determines that--
       ``(1) no covered air carrier is capable of providing, and 
     willing to provide, the relevant transportation; or
       ``(2) use of a covered air carrier is otherwise 
     unreasonable.
       ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       ``(1) Covered air carrier.--The term `covered air carrier' 
     means an air carrier that--
       ``(A) has aircraft in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet or offers 
     to place CRAF-eligible aircraft in that fleet; and
       ``(B) holds a certificate issued under section 41102 of 
     title 49.
       ``(2) CRAF-eligible aircraft.--The term `CRAF-eligible 
     aircraft' means an aircraft of a type that the Secretary of 
     Defense has determined to be eligible to participate in the 
     Civil Reserve Air Fleet.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 2631a the following new item:

``2631b. Airlift service.''.

     SEC. 823. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR SENIOR DEPARTMENT 
                   OF DEFENSE OFFICIALS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT WITH 
                   DEFENSE CONTRACTORS.

       Section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
     subsection (d):
       ``(d) Compliance.--
       ``(1) Official.--The Secretary of Defense shall designate 
     an official of the Department of Defense to ensure the 
     compliance of this section.
       ``(2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this subsection, such designated official 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     on the compliance of this section.''.

     SEC. 824. PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT.

       (a) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall use best 
     value tradeoff source selection methods to the maximum extent 
     practicable when procuring an item of personal protective 
     equipment or critical safety items.
       (b) Personal Protective Equipment Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``personal protective equipment'' includes 
     the following:
       (1) Body armor components.
       (2) Combat helmets.
       (3) Combat protective eyewear.
       (4) Environmental and fire resistant clothing.
       (5) Footwear.
       (6) Organizational clothing and individual equipment.
       (7) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

     SEC. 825. PROHIBITION ON FUNDS FOR CONTRACTS VIOLATING 
                   EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 11246.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 
     be used to enter into any contract with any entity if such 
     contract would violate Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to 
     nonretaliation for disclosure of compensation information), 
     as amended by the announcement of the President on April 8, 
     2014.

     SEC. 826. REQUIREMENT FOR POLICIES AND STANDARD CHECKLIST IN 
                   PROCUREMENT OF SERVICES.

       (a) Requirement.--Section 2330a of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j) as 
     subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new 
     subsection (g):
       ``(g) Request for Service Contract Approval.--The Under 
     Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall--
       ``(1) issue policies implementing a standard checklist to 
     be completed before the issuance of a solicitation for any 
     new contract for services or exercising an option under an 
     existing contract for services, including services provided 
     under a contract for goods; and
       ``(2) ensure such policies and checklist are incorporated 
     into the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal 
     Acquisition Regulation.''.
       (b) Army Model.--In implementing section 2330a(g) of title 
     10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Under 
     Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall model, 
     to the maximum extent practicable, its policies and checklist 
     on the policies and checklist relating to services contract 
     approval established and in use by the Department of the Army 
     (as set forth in the request for services contract approval 
     form updated as of August 2012, or any successor form).
       (c) Deadline.--The policies required under such section 
     2230a(g) shall be issued within 120 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act.
       (d) Report.--The Comptroller General of the United States 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     on the implementation of the standard checklist required 
     under such section 2330a(g) for each of fiscal years 2015, 
     2016, and 2017 within 120 days after the end of each such 
     fiscal year.

      TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

              Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

     SEC. 901. REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AS THE 
                   DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.

       (a) Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the 
     Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.--
       (1) Redesignation of military department.--The military 
     department designated as the Department of the Navy is 
     redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
       (2) Redesignation of secretary and other statutory 
     offices.--
       (A) Secretary.--The position of the Secretary of the Navy 
     is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine 
     Corps.
       (B) Other statutory offices.--The positions of the Under 
     Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the 
     Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy 
     are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and 
     Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and 
     Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of 
     the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively.
       (b) Conforming Amendments to Title 10, United States 
     Code.--
       (1) Definition of ``military department''.--Paragraph (8) 
     of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     to read as follows:
       ``(8) The term `military department' means the Department 
     of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and 
     the Department of the Air Force.''.
       (2) Organization of department.--The text of section 5011 
     of such title is amended to read as follows: ``The Department 
     of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under 
     the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.''.
       (3) Position of secretary.--Section 5013(a)(1) of such 
     title is amended by striking ``There is a Secretary of the 
     Navy'' and inserting ``There is a Secretary of the Navy and 
     Marine Corps''.
       (4) Chapter headings.--
       (A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to 
     read as follows:

       ``CHAPTER 503--DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS''.

       (B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to 
     read as follows:

  ``CHAPTER 507--COMPOSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE 
                                CORPS''.

       (5) Other amendments.--
       (A) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
     ``Department of the Navy'' and ``Secretary of the Navy'' each 
     place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1), 
     (2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection 
     captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and 
     inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and 
     ``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively, in 
     each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface 
     and typestyle as the matter stricken.
       (B)(i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 
     5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking 
     ``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy'' and inserting 
     ``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps''.
       (ii) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the 
     item relating to such section in the table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by 
     inserting ``and Marine Corps'' after ``of the Navy'', with 
     the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface 
     and typestyle as the matter amended.
       (c) Other Provisions of Law and Other References.--

[[Page 8628]]

       (1) Title 37, united states code.--Title 37, United States 
     Code, is amended by striking ``Department of the Navy'' and 
     ``Secretary of the Navy'' each place they appear and 
     inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and 
     ``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively.
       (2) Other references.--Any reference in any law other than 
     in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any 
     regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 
     States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to 
     be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine 
     Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in 
     subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to 
     that office as redesignated by that section.
       (d) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made 
     by this section shall take effect on the first day of the 
     first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 902. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DIRECTOR OF 
                   OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION.

       (a) Additional Responsibility.--Section 139 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), 
     (h), (i), (j), and (k) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), 
     (h), (i), (j), (k), and (l), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
     subsection (c):
       ``(c) The Director shall consider the potential for 
     increases in program cost estimates or delays in schedule 
     estimates in the implementation of policies, procedures, and 
     activities related to operational test and evaluation and 
     shall take appropriate action to ensure that operational test 
     and evaluation activities do not unnecessarily increase 
     program costs or impede program schedules.''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 196(c)(1)(A)(ii) of such 
     title is amended by striking ``section 139(i)'' and inserting 
     ``section 139(k)''.

     SEC. 903. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INSTALLATIONS 
                   AND ENVIRONMENT.

       (a) Establishment of Position.--Section 138(b) of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new paragraph:
       ``(11) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant 
     Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. In 
     addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph 
     (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and 
     Environment shall have the duties specified in section 138e 
     of this title.''.
       (b) Duties.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 4 of such title is amended by 
     inserting after section 138d the following new section:

     ``Sec. 138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations 
       and Environment

     ``(a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations 
     and Environment shall--
       ``(1) provide leadership and facilitate communication 
     regarding, and conduct oversight to manage and be accountable 
     for, military construction and environmental programs within 
     the Department of Defense and the Army, Navy, Air Force, and 
     Marine Corps;
       ``(2) coordinate and oversee planning and programming 
     activities of the Department of Defense and the Army, Navy, 
     Air Force, and Marine Corps;
       ``(3) establish policies and guidance, in coordination with 
     the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, regarding 
     installation assets and services that are required to support 
     defense missions.
       ``(b) The Assistant Secretary may communicate views on 
     issues within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary 
     directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary 
     of Defense without obtaining the approval or concurrence of 
     any other official within the Department of Defense.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 
     4 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
     relating to section 138c the following new item:

``138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and 
              Environment.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendments.--
       (1) In general.--
       (A) Section 2701(k)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Installations and Environment'' and inserting ``Assistant 
     Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment''.
       (B) Section 2885(a)(3) of such title is amended by striking 
     ``Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and 
     Environment)'' and inserting ``Assistant Secretary of Defense 
     for Installations and Environment''.
       (2) References in other laws.--Any reference in any law, 
     regulation, document, or other record of the United States to 
     the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and 
     Environment shall be treated as referring to the Assistant 
     Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment.
       (d) No Additional Funds Authorized.--No additional funds 
     are authorized by this Act to accomplish the mission of the 
     Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and 
     Environment. Such mission shall be carried out using amounts 
     otherwise authorized or appropriated.
       (e) Restriction on Personnel.--The number of positions for 
     military and civilian personnel and the number of full-time 
     equivalent positions for contractor personnel associated with 
     the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
     Installations and Environment shall not exceed the number of 
     such positions that were associated with the Deputy Under 
     Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment as of 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (f) Construction.--Nothing in this section or the 
     amendments made by this section shall be construed as 
     exempting the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
     for Installations and Environment from further reductions as 
     part of headquarters efficiencies initiatives of the 
     Department of Defense.

     SEC. 904. REQUIREMENT FOR CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING BEFORE 
                   DIVESTING OF DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 
                   SERVICE FUNCTIONS.

       No plan may be implemented by the Secretary of Defense, the 
     Secretary of a military department, the Director of the 
     Defense Finance and Accounting Service, or any other person 
     to transfer financial management, bill paying, or accounting 
     services functions from the Defense Finance and Accounting 
     Service to another entity until the Secretary of Defense 
     provides the congressional defense committees a briefing on 
     the plan and the Secretary certifies to such committees that 
     the plan would reduce costs, increase efficiencies, maintain 
     the timeline for auditability of financial statements, and 
     maintain the roles and missions of the Defense Finance and 
     Accounting Service.

     SEC. 905. COMBATANT COMMAND EFFICIENCY PLAN.

       (a) Plan Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop 
     a plan to combine the back office functions of the 
     headquarters of two or more combatant commands, including the 
     subordinate component commands.
       (b) Matters to Be Considered.--The plan required by 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) A detailed discussion of combining or otherwise sharing 
     in whole or in part similar back office functions between two 
     or more combatant command headquarters located in the same 
     country.
       (2) A detailed discussion of combining or otherwise sharing 
     in whole or in part similar back office functions of the 
     Joint Staff and some or all combatant command headquarters.
       (3) A detailed discussion of establishing a new 
     organization to manage similar back office functions of two 
     or more combatant command headquarters located in the same 
     country.
       (4) A detailed discussion of the risks and capabilities 
     lost by implementing such consolidations and efficiencies.
       (5) A detailed discussion of how the efficiencies and 
     consolidations in assigned personnel and resources are in 
     support of the quadrennial defense review and the strategic 
     choices and management review of the Department of Defense.
       (6) Any other arrangements that the Secretary considers 
     appropriate.
       (c) Report Required.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a report containing--
       (1) a summary of the plan required by subsection (a); and
       (2) the potential cost savings of any arrangements the 
     Secretary considers in conducting the study.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Back office functions.--The term ``back office 
     functions'' means the administration and support functions of 
     a headquarters of a combatant command, including human 
     resources or other personnel functions, budgeting, and 
     information technology support.
       (2) Combatant command.--The term ``combatant command'' 
     means a combatant command established pursuant to section 161 
     or 167 of title 10, United States Code.
       (e) Limitation.--Of the amounts authorized to be 
     appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of 
     Defense for operations and maintenance, defense-wide, Joint 
     Chiefs of Staff, as specified in the funding table for 
     section 4301, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or 
     expended until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with 
     the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provides the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
     the briefing on combatant command headquarters personnel and 
     resources requirements as directed in the Report of the 
     Committee on Armed Services on H.R. 1960 of the 113th 
     Congress (House Report 113-102) under title X.

     SEC. 906. REQUIREMENT FOR PLAN TO REDUCE GEOGRAPHIC COMBATANT 
                   COMMANDS TO FOUR BY FISCAL YEAR 2020.

       (a) Plan Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop 
     a plan for reducing the number of geographic combatant 
     commands to no more than four by the end of fiscal year 2020.
       (b) Matters Covered.--The plan required by subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) A detailed discussion of the required reductions and 
     consolidations in assigned personnel, resources, and 
     infrastructure of the various geographic combatant commands, 
     set forth separately by fiscal year, to achieve the goal of 
     no more than four such commands by the end of fiscal year 
     2020.
       (2) A detailed discussion of the changes to the Unified 
     Command Plan if such reductions and consolidations are 
     implemented.
       (3) A detailed discussion and recommendations on the 
     feasibility, risks, and capabilities lost by implementing 
     such reductions and consolidations.
       (c) Functional Commands Not Included.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed as requiring the Department of 
     Defense to include

[[Page 8629]]

     changes to the functional combatant commands or reductions in 
     the functional combatant commands in the plan required by 
     subsection (a).
       (d) Use of Previous Studies and Outside Experts.--In 
     developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Secretary 
     may--
       (1) use and incorporate previous plans or studies of the 
     Department of Defense; and
       (2) consult with and incorporate views of defense experts 
     from outside the Department.
       (e) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report containing the plan required by subsection (a), 
     including the feasibility and risks of such plan, and any 
     recommendations to implement the plan as the Secretary 
     considers appropriate.
       (f) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed as requiring the Secretary to develop a binding 
     plan.

     SEC. 907. OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT.

       (a) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States to 
     maintain an independent organization within the Department of 
     Defense to develop and coordinate net assessments of the 
     standing, trends, and future prospects of the military 
     capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison 
     with the military capabilities and potential of other 
     countries or groups of countries so as to identify emerging 
     or future threats or opportunities for the United States.
       (b) Establishment.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 145. OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT.

       ``(a) In General.--There is in the Office of the Secretary 
     of Defense an office known as the Office of Net Assessment.
       ``(b) Head.--(1) The head of the Office of Net Assessment 
     shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense. The head 
     shall be a member of the Senior Executive Service.
       ``(2) The head of the Office of Net Assessment may 
     communicate views on matters within the responsibility of the 
     head directly to the Secretary without obtaining the approval 
     or concurrence of any other official within the Department of 
     Defense.
       ``(3) The head of the Office of Net Assessment shall report 
     directly to the Secretary.
       ``(4) The Office is subject to the authority, direction, 
     and control of the Secretary. The Secretary may not delegate 
     the responsibility to exercise such authority, direction, and 
     control over the Office.
       ``(c) Responsibilities.--The Office of Net Assessment shall 
     develop and coordinate net assessments with respect to the 
     standing, trends, and future prospects of the military 
     capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison 
     with the military capabilities and potential of other 
     countries or groups of countries to identify emerging or 
     future threats or opportunities for the United States.
       ``(d) Budget.--In the budget materials submitted to the 
     President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the 
     submittal to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, 
     of the budget for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014, the 
     Secretary shall ensure that a separate, dedicated program 
     element is assigned for the Office of Net Assessment.
       ``(e) Net Assessment Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `net assessment' means the comparative analysis of military, 
     technological, political, economic, and other factors 
     governing the relative military capability of nations.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by adding at 
     the end the following new item:

``145. Office of Net Assessment.''.

     SEC. 908. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 
                   OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.

       (a) Deputy Chief Management Officer.--Subsection (b) of 
     section 132a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 
     read as follows:
       ``(b) Responsibilities.--Subject to the authority, 
     direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the 
     Deputy Chief Management Officer shall perform such duties and 
     exercise such powers as the Secretary may prescribe. The 
     Deputy Chief Management Officer shall--
       ``(1) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy 
     Secretary's capacity as Chief Management Officer of the 
     Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title and 
     perform those duties assigned by the Secretary of Defense or 
     delegated by the Deputy Secretary pursuant to section 
     904(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 132 note);
       ``(2) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy 
     Secretary's capacity as the Chief Operating Officer of the 
     Department of Defense under section 1123 of title 31;
       ``(3) establish policies for the strategic management and 
     integration of the Department of Defense business operations 
     and activities;
       ``(4) have the responsibilities specified for the Deputy 
     Chief Management Officer for the purposes of section 2222 of 
     this title; and
       ``(5) be the Performance Improvement Officer of the 
     Department of Defense for the purposes of section 1124(a)(1) 
     of title 31.''.
       (b) Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Defense.--
       (1) Statutory establishment of position.--Chapter 4 of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
     section 141 the following new section:

     ``Sec. 142. Chief information officer

       ``(a) There is a Chief Information Officer of the 
     Department of Defense.
       ``(b)(1) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Defense--
       ``(A) is the Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Defense for the purposes of sections 3506(a)(2) and 
     3544(a)(3) of title 44;
       ``(B) has the responsibilities and duties specified in 
     section 11315 of title 40; and
       ``(C) has the responsibilities specified for the Chief 
     Information Officer in sections 2222, 2223(a), and 2224 of 
     this title.
       ``(2) The Chief Information Officer shall perform such 
     additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary 
     of Defense may prescribe.
       ``(c) The Chief Information Officer takes precedence in the 
     Department of Defense with the officials serving in positions 
     specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title. The officials 
     serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) and the 
     Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense take 
     precedence among themselves in the order prescribed by the 
     Secretary of Defense.''.
       (2) Placement in the office of the secretary of defense.--
     Section 131(b) of such title is amended--
       (A) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (8) as 
     paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 
     paragraph (5):
       ``(5) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Defense.''.
       (c) Repeal of Requirement for Defense Business System 
     Management Committee.--Section 186 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is repealed.
       (d) Assignment of Responsibility for Defense Business 
     Systems.--Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1);
       (B) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (2) and 
     inserting a period; and
       (C) by striking paragraph (3);
       (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``Defense Business 
     Systems Management Committee'' and inserting ``investment 
     review board established under subsection (g)''; and
       (3) in subsection (g)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, not later than March 
     15, 2012,'';
       (B) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``each'' the first 
     place it appears and inserting ``the''; and
       (C) in paragraph (2)(F), by striking ``and the Defense 
     Business Systems Management Committee, as required by section 
     186(c) of this title,''.
       (e) Deadline for Establishment of Investment Review Board 
     and Investment Management Process.--The investment review 
     board and investment management process required by section 
     2222(g) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by 
     subsection (d)(3), shall be established not later than March 
     15, 2015.
       (f) Amendments Relating to Certain Prescribed Assistant 
     Secretary of Defense Positions.--Chapter 4 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is further amended as follows:
       (1) Assistant secretary of defense for logistics and 
     materiel readiness.--Paragraph (7) of section 138(b) is 
     amended--
       (A) by inserting after ``Readiness'' in the first sentence 
     the following: ``, who shall be appointed from among persons 
     with an extensive background in the sustainment of major 
     weapons systems and combat support equipment'';
       (B) by striking the second sentence;
       (C) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as 
     amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of subsection (b) of 
     section 138a of such title;
       (D) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as 
     amended by subparagraph (C)) the text of subsection (c) of 
     section 138a of such title; and
       (E) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) in the text 
     transferred by subparagraph (D) of this paragraph as 
     subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.
       (2) Assistant secretary of defense for research and 
     engineering.--Paragraph (8) of such section is amended--
       (A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text 
     of subsection (a) of section 138b;
       (B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) 
     of this paragraph the following: ``The Assistant Secretary, 
     in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
     Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall--'';
       (C) by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
     (b) of section 138b to the end of that paragraph (as amended 
     by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph), indenting 
     those paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and 
     redesignating those paragraphs as subparagraphs (A) and (B), 
     respectively;
       (D) in subparagraph (A) (as so transferred and 
     redesignated)--
       (i) by striking ``The Assistant Secretary'' and all that 
     follows through ``Test and Evaluation, shall''; and
       (ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
     and''; and
       (E) in subparagraph (B) (as so transferred and 
     redesignated), by striking ``The Assistant Secretary'' and 
     all that follows through ``Test and Evaluation, shall''.
       (3) Assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, 
     and biological defense programs.--Paragraph (10) of such 
     section is amended--

[[Page 8630]]

       (A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text 
     of subsection (b) of section 138d; and
       (B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) 
     of this paragraph the text of subsection (a) of such section 
     and in that text as so inserted--
       (i) by striking ``of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and 
     Biological Defense Programs'' and
       (ii) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as 
     subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.
       (4) Repeal of separate sections.--Sections 138a, 138b, and 
     138d are repealed.
       (g) Codification of Restrictions on Use of the Deputy Under 
     Secretary of Defense Title.--
       (1) Codification.--Section 137a(a) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(3) The officials authorized under this section shall be 
     the only Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.''.
       (2) Conforming repeal.--Section 906(a)(2) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
     111-84; 123 Stat. 2426; 10 U.S.C. 137a note) is repealed.
       (3) Conforming amendment for the vacancy reform act of 
     1998.--Section 137a(b) of such title is amended by striking 
     ``is absent or disabled'' and inserting ``dies, resigns, or 
     is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of 
     the office''.
       (h) Clarification of Order of Precedence for the Principal 
     Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense and the Assistant 
     Secretaries of Defense.--
       (1) Subsection (d) of section 137a of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by striking ``and the Deputy Chief 
     Management Officer of the Department of Defense'' and 
     inserting ``the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the 
     Department of Defense, and the officials serving in the 
     positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title and 
     the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense''.
       (2) Subsection (d) of section 138 of such title is amended 
     by inserting ``and the Chief Information Officer of the 
     Department of Defense'' after ``section 131(b)(4) of this 
     title''.
       (i) Conforming Amendment to Prior Reduction in the Number 
     of Assistant Secretaries of Defense.--Section 5315 of title 
     5, United States Code, is amended by striking ``Assistant 
     Secretaries of Defense (16)'' and inserting ``Assistant 
     Secretaries of Defense (14)''.
       (j) Clerical and Conforming Amendments.--Title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended as follows:
       (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 is 
     amended--
       (A) by striking the items relating to sections 138a, 138b, 
     and 138d; and
       (B) by inserting after the item relating to section 141 the 
     following new item:

``142. Chief Information Officer.''.
       (2) Section 131(b)(8), as redesignated by subsection 
     (b)(2)(A), is amended--
       (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (H) as 
     subparagraphs (B) through (I), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated 
     by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the following new 
     subparagraph (A):
       ``(A) The two Deputy Directors within the Office of the 
     Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation under 
     section 139a(c) of this title.''.
       (3) Section 132(b) is amended by striking ``is disabled or 
     there is no Secretary of Defense'' and inserting ``dies, 
     resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and 
     duties of the office''.
       (4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 186.

     SEC. 909. PERIODIC REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 
                   HEADQUARTERS.

       (a) Plan Required.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     develop a plan for implementing a periodic review and 
     analysis of the Department of Defense personnel requirements 
     for management headquarters.
       (b) Elements of Plan.--The plan required by subsection (a) 
     shall include the following for each covered organization:
       (1) A list of the key Department of Defense strategic 
     guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the 
     quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the 
     strategic choices and management review.
       (2) A description of how current management headquarters 
     are structured to execute the Department of Defense strategic 
     guidance, policy, and mission requirements listed under 
     paragraph (1).
       (3) A description of the critical capabilities and 
     skillsets required by management headquarters to execute 
     Department of Defense strategic guidance in order to fulfill 
     mission objectives.
       (4) An identification and analysis of the factors that 
     directly or indirectly influence or contribute to the expense 
     of Department of Defense management headquarters
       (5) A description of the proposed timeline and required 
     resources necessary to implement a permanent periodic review 
     and analysis of Department of Defense personnel requirements 
     for management headquarters.
       (c) Covered Organization.--In this section, the term 
     ``covered organization'' includes each of the following:
       (1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense.
       (2) The Joint Staff.
       (3) The Defense Agencies.
       (4) The Department of Defense field activities.
       (5) The headquarters of the combatant commands.
       (6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the 
     Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief 
     of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.
       (7) The major command headquarters of the Army.
       (8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of 
     the Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United 
     States Marine Corps.
       (9) The major command headquarters of the Navy and the 
     Marine Corps.
       (10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including 
     the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of 
     the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff.
       (11) The major command headquarters of the Air Force.
       (12) The National Guard Bureau.
       (d) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees the plan required by 
     subsection (a).
       (e) Amendments.--Section 904(d)(2) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 816; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``2016'' and inserting ``2017'';
       (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``, consolidations,'' 
     after ``through changes'';
       (3) in subparagraph (C)--
       (A) by inserting ``, consolidations,'' after ``through 
     changes''; and
       (B) by inserting ``, or other associated cost drivers, 
     including a discussion of how the changes, consolidations, or 
     reductions were prioritized,'' after ``programs and 
     offices'';
       (4) in subparagraph (E), by inserting ``, including the 
     risks of, and capabilities gained or lost by implementing, 
     such modifications'' before the period; and
       (5) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
       ``(F) A description of how the plan supports or affects 
     current Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and 
     mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense 
     review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices 
     and management review.
       ``(G) A description of the associated costs specifically 
     addressed by the savings.''.

                   Subtitle B--Total Force Management

     SEC. 911. MODIFICATIONS TO BIENNIAL STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN 
                   RELATING TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT, FUNCTIONAL, AND 
                   TECHNICAL WORKFORCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE.

       (a) Senior Management Workforce.--Subsection (c) of section 
     115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
       ``(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) 
     shall--
       ``(A) include a separate chapter to specifically address 
     the shaping and improvement of the senior management 
     workforce of the Department of Defense; and
       ``(B) include an assessment of the senior functional and 
     technical workforce of the Department of Defense within the 
     appropriate functional community.''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``such senior management, 
     functional, and technical workforce'' and inserting ``such 
     senior management workforce and such senior functional and 
     technical workforce''.
       (b) Highly Qualified Experts.--Such section is further 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``subsection (f)(1)'' 
     in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting ``subsection 
     (h)(1) or (h)(2)'';
       (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
     (g) and (h), respectively; and
       (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
     subsection (f):
       ``(f) Highly Qualified Experts.--
       ``(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) 
     shall include an assessment of the workforce of the 
     Department of Defense comprised of highly qualified experts 
     appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this 
     subsection referred to as the `HQE workforce').
       ``(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall 
     include, with respect to the HQE workforce--
       ``(A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies 
     of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that 
     workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and 
     other attrition;
       ``(B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and 
     motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the 
     program objectives of the Department to be achieved through 
     such strategies and the funding needed to implement such 
     strategies;
       ``(C) any incentives necessary to attract or retain HQE 
     personnel;
       ``(D) any changes that may be necessary in resources or in 
     the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure the Department 
     has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and
       ``(E) any legislative changes that may be necessary to 
     achieve HQE workforce goals.''.
       (c) Definitions.--Subsection (h) of such section (as 
     redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as 
     follows:
       ``(h) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `senior management workforce of the 
     Department of Defense' includes the following categories of 
     Department of Defense civilian personnel:
       ``(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under 
     section 3131 of title 5.

[[Page 8631]]

       ``(B) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior 
     Executive Service under section 1606 of this title.
       ``(2) The term `senior functional and technical workforce 
     of the Department of Defense' includes the following 
     categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:
       ``(A) Persons serving in positions described in section 
     5376(a) of title 5.
       ``(B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to 
     section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337; 108 Stat. 2721), as 
     amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted 
     into law by Public Law 106-398 (114 Stat. 1654A-315)).
       ``(C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to 
     section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).
       ``(D) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level 
     positions under section 1607 of this title.
       ``(3) The term `acquisition workforce' includes individuals 
     designated under section 1721 of this title as filling 
     acquisition positions.''.
       (d) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of subsection (c) of 
     such section is amended to read as follows: ``Senior 
     Management Workforce; Senior Functional and Technical 
     Workforce.--''.

     SEC. 912. REPEAL OF EXTENSION OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT 
                   ON INVENTORY.

       Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2402), as 
     amended by section 951(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 839), is amended by striking ``2013, 2014, and 
     2015'' and inserting ``and 2013''.

     SEC. 913. ASSIGNMENT OF CERTAIN NEW REQUIREMENTS BASED ON 
                   DETERMINATIONS OF COST-EFFICIENCY.

       (a) Amendment.--Chapter 146 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 2463 the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on 
       determinations of cost-efficiency

       ``(a) Assignments Based on Determinations of Cost-
     efficiency.--(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) and 
     subject to subsection (b), the assignment of performance of a 
     new requirement by the Department of Defense to military 
     personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel shall 
     be based on a determination of which sector of the 
     Department's workforce can perform the services in the most 
     cost-efficient manner, based on an analysis of the costs to 
     the Federal Government in accordance with Department of 
     Defense Instruction 7041.04 (`Estimating and Comparing the 
     Full Costs of Civilian and Active Duty Military Manpower and 
     Contract Support') or successor guidance.
       ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a new 
     requirement that is inherently governmental, closely 
     associated with inherently governmental functions, critical, 
     or required by law to be performed by military personnel or 
     civilian personnel.
       ``(3) Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting 
     the requirements of the Department of Defense under policies 
     and procedures established by the Secretary of Defense under 
     section 129a of this title for determining the most 
     appropriate and cost-efficient mix of military, civilian, and 
     contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department 
     of Defense.
       ``(b) Waiver Authority.--(1) Notwithstanding subsection 
     (a), the Secretary of a military department, the commander of 
     a combatant command, or the head of a Defense Agency or 
     activity may waive such subsection and assign performance of 
     a new requirement without a determination of cost-efficiency 
     as required by such subsection if--
       ``(A) the Secretary, commander, or head certifies in 
     writing to the congressional defense committees that the time 
     required to conduct the determination of cost-efficiency 
     would result in a gap in service that would significantly 
     undermine performance of the mission of the Department of 
     Defense or pose an unacceptable risk; and
       ``(B) a period of 30 days has expired after such 
     certification is so submitted to the committees.
       ``(2) A waiver of subsection (a) may be in effect for a 
     period of not greater than 180 days.
       ``(3) The waiver authority under this subsection may not be 
     exercised after September 30, 2015.
       ``(c) Provisions Relating to Assignment of Civilian 
     Personnel.--If a new requirement is assigned to civilian 
     personnel consistent with the requirements of this section--
       ``(1) the Secretary of Defense may not--
       ``(A) impose any constraint or limitation on the size of 
     the civilian workforce in terms of man years, end strength, 
     full-time equivalent positions, or maximum number of 
     employees; or
       ``(B) require offsetting funding for civilian pay or 
     benefits or require a reduction in civilian full-time 
     equivalents or civilian end-strengths; and
       ``(2) the Secretary may assign performance of such 
     requirement without regard to whether the employee is a 
     temporary, term, or permanent employee.
       ``(d) New Requirement Described.--For purposes of this 
     section, a new requirement is an activity or function that is 
     not being performed, as of the date of consideration for 
     assignment of performance under this section, by military 
     personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel at a 
     Department of Defense component, organization, installation, 
     or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an 
     activity or function that is performed at such an entity and 
     that is re-engineered, reorganized, modernized, upgraded, 
     expanded, or changed to become more efficient but is still 
     essentially providing the same service shall not be 
     considered a new requirement.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 2463 the following new item:

``2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations 
              of cost-efficiency.''.

     SEC. 914. PROHIBITION ON CONVERSION OF FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY 
                   CIVILIAN OR CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO PERFORMANCE 
                   BY MILITARY PERSONNEL.

       Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(g) Prohibition on Performance of Certain Functions by 
     Military Personnel.--(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
     no functions performed by civilian personnel or contractors 
     may be converted to performance by military personnel 
     unless--
       ``(A) there is a direct link between the functions to be 
     performed and a military occupational specialty; and
       ``(B) the conversion to performance by military personnel 
     is cost effective, based on Department of Defense instruction 
     7041.04 (or any successor administrative regulation, 
     directive, or policy).
       ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following 
     functions:
       ``(A) Functions required by law or regulation to be 
     performed by military personnel.
       ``(B) Functions related to--
       ``(i) missions involving operation risks and combatant 
     status under the Law of War;
       ``(ii) specialized collective and individual training 
     requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on 
     recent operational experience;
       ``(iii) independent advice to senior civilian leadership in 
     the Department of Defense requiring military-unique knowledge 
     and skills based on recent operational experience; and
       ``(iv) command and control arrangements under chapter 47 of 
     this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).''.

     SEC. 915. NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION RELATING TO 
                   PROCUREMENT OF SERVICES.

       (a) Notification.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
     compliance with section 2330a of title 10, United States 
     Code, and shall provide, in writing, notification of such 
     compliance to the congressional defense committees not later 
     than March 1, 2015.
       (b) Review by Comptroller General.--The Comptroller General 
     of the United States shall review the notification of 
     compliance required by subsection (a) and report any findings 
     or recommendations to the congressional defense committees 
     not later than 120 days after the date on which the 
     notification is provided.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 921. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF 
                   COSTS OF ACTIVITIES FOR NONGOVERNMENTAL 
                   PERSONNEL AT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REGIONAL 
                   CENTERS FOR SECURITY STUDIES.

       Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) 
     is amended by striking ``through 2014'' and inserting 
     ``through 2019''.

     SEC. 922. AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE AND MEMBERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR 
                   FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS TO OCCUPY QUARTERS ON A 
                   RENTAL BASIS WHILE PERFORMING OFFICIAL TRAVEL.

       (a) Definition.--Section 5911(a)(5) of title 5, United 
     States Code, is amended by striking ``Government; and'' and 
     inserting ``Government or commercial lodging arranged through 
     a Government lodging program; and''.
       (b) Authority.--Section 5911(e) of title 5, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``(e) The'' and inserting ``(e)(1) Except 
     as provided in paragraph (2), the''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2)(A) The Secretary of Defense may require an employee 
     of the Department of Defense or a member of the uniformed 
     services under the Secretary's jurisdiction performing duty 
     on official travel to occupy adequate quarters on a rental 
     basis when available.
       ``(B) A requirement under subparagraph (A) with respect to 
     an employee of the Department of Defense may not be construed 
     to be subject to negotiation under chapter 71 or any other 
     provision of this title.''.

     SEC. 923. SINGLE STANDARD MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RATE FOR 
                   PRIVATELY OWNED AUTOMOBILES OF GOVERNMENT 
                   EMPLOYEES AND MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED 
                   SERVICES.

       (a) In General.--Section 5704(a)(1) of title 5, United 
     States Code, is amended in the last sentence by striking all 
     that follows: ``the rate per mile'' and inserting ``shall be 
     the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal 
     Revenue Service.''.
       (b) Regulations and Reports.--
       (1) Provisions relating to privately owned airplanes and 
     motorcycles.--Paragraph (1)(A) of section 5707(b) of title 5, 
     United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

[[Page 8632]]

       ``(1)(A) The Administrator of General Services shall 
     conduct periodic investigations of the cost of travel and the 
     operation of privately owned airplanes and privately owned 
     motorcycles by employees while engaged on official business, 
     and shall report the results of such investigations to 
     Congress at least once a year.''.
       (2) Provisions relating to privately owned automobiles.--
     Clause (i) of section 5707(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States 
     Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(i) shall provide that the mileage reimbursement rate for 
     privately owned automobiles, as provided in section 
     5704(a)(1), is the single standard mileage rate established 
     by the Internal Revenue Service referred to in that section, 
     and''.

                      TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                     Subtitle A--Financial Matters

     SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

       (a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
       (1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of 
     Defense that such action is necessary in the national 
     interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of 
     authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in 
     this division for fiscal year 2015 between any such 
     authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions 
     thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be 
     merged with and be available for the same purposes as the 
     authorization to which transferred.
       (2) Limitation.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 
     total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may 
     transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed 
     $4,000,000,000.
       (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel 
     authorizations.--A transfer of funds between military 
     personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted 
     toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
       (b) Limitations.--The authority provided by subsection (a) 
     to transfer authorizations--
       (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that 
     have a higher priority than the items from which authority is 
     transferred; and
       (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that 
     has been denied authorization by Congress.
       (c) Effect on Authorization Amounts.--A transfer made from 
     one account to another under the authority of this section 
     shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the 
     account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal 
     to the amount transferred.
       (d) Notice to Congress.--The Secretary shall promptly 
     notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

     SEC. 1002. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDITS 
                   OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

       Section 1008 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107; 115 Stat. 1204; 10 
     U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking subsection (d).

     SEC. 1003. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL 
                   NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN 
                   NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION AND NAVAL 
                   REACTORS.

       (a) Transfer Authorized.--If the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated for the weapons activities of the National 
     Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 is less than 
     $8,700,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such 
     activities in fiscal year 2015 as specified in the report 
     under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2549)), 
     the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts 
     authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense 
     for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary 
     of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be 
     available only for naval reactors or weapons activities of 
     the National Nuclear Security Administration.
       (b) Notice to Congress.--In the event of a transfer under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly 
     notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such 
     notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from 
     which funds are transferred.
       (c) Transfer Mechanism.--Any funds transferred under this 
     section shall be transferred in accordance with established 
     procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor 
     provisions of law.
       (d) Construction of Authority.--The transfer authority 
     provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other 
     transfer authority provided under this Act.

     SEC. 1004. MANAGEMENT OF DEFENSE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
                   SYSTEMS.

       (a) In General.--Section 2222 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 2222. Management of Defense information technology 
       systems

       ``(a) Conditions for Obligation of Funds for Covered 
     Defense Information Technology System Programs.--Funds 
     available to the Department of Defense, whether appropriated 
     or non-appropriated, may not be obligated for a defense 
     information technology system program that will have a total 
     cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of the current 
     future-years defense program submitted to Congress under 
     section 221 of this title unless--
       ``(1) the appropriate pre-certification authority for the 
     covered defense information technology system program has 
     determined that--
       ``(A) the defense information technology system program is 
     in compliance with the enterprise architecture developed 
     under subsection (b) and appropriate business process re-
     engineering efforts have been undertaken to ensure that--
       ``(i) the business process supported by the defense 
     information technology system program is or will be as 
     streamlined and efficient as practicable; and
       ``(ii) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems 
     to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique 
     requirements or incorporate unique interfaces has been 
     eliminated or reduced to the maximum extent practicable;
       ``(B) the defense information technology system program is 
     necessary to achieve a critical national security capability 
     or address a critical requirement in an area such as safety 
     or security; or
       ``(C) the defense information technology system program is 
     necessary to prevent a significant adverse effect on a 
     project that is needed to achieve an essential capability, 
     taking into consideration the alternative solutions for 
     preventing such adverse effect; and
       ``(2) the covered defense information technology system 
     program has been reviewed and certified by the investment 
     review board established under subsection (e).
       ``(b) Enterprise Architecture for Defense Information 
     Technology Systems.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall 
     develop an enterprise architecture, known as the joint 
     information technology enterprise architecture, to cover all 
     defense information technology systems, and the functions and 
     activities supported by defense information technology 
     systems, which shall be sufficiently defined to effectively 
     guide, constrain, and permit implementation of interoperable 
     defense information technology system solutions and 
     consistent with the policies and procedures established by 
     the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
       ``(2) The Secretary of Defense shall delegate 
     responsibility and accountability for the defense information 
     technology enterprise architecture content, including 
     unambiguous definitions of functional processes, business 
     rules, and standards, as follows:
       ``(A) For the warfighting mission area, the Joint Staff 
     shall be responsible and accountable for the content of those 
     portions of the defense information systems enterprise 
     architecture.
       ``(B) For the business systems mission area, the Deputy 
     Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall 
     be responsible and accountable for the content of those 
     portions of the defense information technology enterprise 
     architecture.
       ``(C) For the Enterprise Information environment mission 
     area, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Defense shall be responsible and accountable for the content 
     of those portions of the defense information technology 
     enterprise architecture.
       ``(c) Composition of Enterprise Architecture.--The defense 
     information technology enterprise architecture developed 
     under subsection (b)(1)(A) shall include the following:
       ``(1) An information infrastructure that, at a minimum, 
     would enable the Department of Defense to comply with all 
     applicable law.
       ``(2) Policies, procedures, data standards, performance 
     measures, and system interface requirements that are to apply 
     uniformly throughout the Department of Defense.
       ``(3) A target defense information technology systems 
     computing environment, compliant with the defense information 
     technology enterprise architecture, as determined by the 
     Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.
       ``(d) Designation of Appropriate Pre-certification 
     Authorities and Senior Officials.--For purposes of 
     subsections (a) and (e), the appropriate pre-certification 
     authority for a defense information technology system program 
     is as follows:
       ``(1) In the case of an Army program, the Secretary of the 
     Army.
       ``(2) In the case of a Navy program, the Secretary of the 
     Navy.
       ``(3) In the case of an Air Force program, the Secretary of 
     the Air Force.
       ``(4) In the case of a program of a Defense Agency, the 
     Director, or equivalent, of such Defense Agency, unless 
     otherwise approved by the Secretary of Defense.
       ``(5) In the case of a program that will support the 
     business processes of more than one military department or 
     Defense Agency, an appropriate pre-certification authority 
     designated by the Secretary of Defense.
       ``(e) Defense Information Technology System Investment 
     Review.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish an 
     investment review board and investment management process to 
     review and certify the planning, design, acquisition, 
     development, deployment, operation, maintenance, 
     modernization, and project cost benefits and risks of covered 
     defense information technology systems programs. The 
     investment review board and investment management process so 
     established shall specifically address the requirements of 
     subsection (a).
       ``(2) The review of defense information technology systems 
     programs under the investment management process shall 
     include the following:
       ``(A) Review and approval by an investment review board of 
     each covered defense information technology system program 
     before the obligation of funds on the system in accordance 
     with the requirements of subsection (a).
       ``(B) Periodic review of all covered defense information 
     technology system programs, grouped in mission areas.
       ``(C) Representation on each investment review board by 
     appropriate officials from among

[[Page 8633]]

     the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the armed forces, the 
     combatant commands, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the 
     Defense Agencies, including representation from each of the 
     following:
       ``(i) The appropriate pre-certification authority for the 
     defense information technology system under review.
       ``(ii) The appropriate senior official of the Department of 
     Defense for the functions and activities supported by the 
     defense information technology system under review.
       ``(iii) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Defense.
       ``(D) Use of threshold criteria to ensure an appropriate 
     level of review within the Department of Defense of, and 
     accountability for, defense information technology system 
     programs depending on scope, complexity, and cost.
       ``(E) Use of procedures for making certifications in 
     accordance with the requirements of subsection (a).
       ``(f) Budget Information.--In the materials that the 
     Secretary submits to Congress in support of the budget 
     submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for 
     fiscal year 2015 and fiscal years thereafter, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall include the following information:
       ``(1) Identification of each defense information technology 
     system program for which funding is proposed in that budget.
       ``(2) Identification of all funds, by appropriation, 
     proposed in that budget for each such program, including--
       ``(A) funds for current services (to operate and maintain 
     the system covered by such program); and
       ``(B) funds for information technology systems 
     modernization, identified for each specific appropriation.
       ``(3) For each such program, identification of the 
     appropriate pre-certification authority and senior official 
     of the Department of Defense designated under subsection (d).
       ``(4) For each such program, a description of each approval 
     made under subsection (a)(3) with regard to such program, 
     including--
       ``(A) specific milestones and actual performance against 
     specified performance measures, and any revision of such 
     milestones and performance measures; and
       ``(B) specific actions on the defense information 
     technology system programs submitted for certification under 
     such subsection.
       ``(5) Identification of any covered defense information 
     technology system program during the preceding fiscal year 
     that was not approved under subsection (a), and the reasons 
     for the lack of approval.
       ``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `enterprise architecture' has the meaning 
     given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44.
       ``(4) The terms `information system' and `information 
     technology' have the meanings given those terms in section 
     11101 of title 40.
       ``(5) The term `national security system' has the meaning 
     given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The item relating to section 2222 
     in the table of chapters at the beginning of chapter 131 of 
     such title is amended to read as follows:

``2222. Management of Defense information technology systems.''.

                  Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

     SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED 
                   COUNTERDRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN 
                   COLOMBIA.

       (a) Extension.--Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 
     (Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently 
     amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66), is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2014'' and inserting 
     ``2015''; and
       (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``2014'' and inserting 
     ``2015''.
       (b) Notice to Congress on Assistance.--Not later than 15 
     days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the 
     Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds 
     available for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice 
     setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the 
     types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and 
     the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision 
     of such assistance.

     SEC. 1012. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR 
                   COUNTERDRUG ACTIVITIES OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL 
                   AGENCIES.

       Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510;10 
     U.S.C. 374 note), as most recently amended by section 1005 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81), is amended by striking ``During fiscal 
     years 2012 through 2014'' and inserting ``During fiscal years 
     2014 through 2017''.

     SEC. 1013. SUBMITTAL OF BIANNUAL REPORTS ON USE OF FUNDS IN 
                   THE DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG 
                   ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE ACCOUNT ON THE 
                   COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE HOUSE OF 
                   REPRESENTATIVES AND THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN 
                   RELATIONS OF THE SENATE.

       Consistent with section 481(b) of the Foreign Assistance 
     Act (22 U.S.C. 2291b), section 1009(a) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 1906) is amended by inserting ``, the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, 
     and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate'' after 
     ``congressional defense committees''.

     SEC. 1014. NATIONAL GUARD DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG 
                   ACTIVITIES.

       Section 112 of title 32, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(4) The operation of regionally located National Guard 
     Counter-drug Training Centers within the United States for 
     the purposes of providing counter-drug related training to 
     Federal, State, and local law enforcement personnel, as well 
     as for foreign law enforcement personnel participating in the 
     National Guard State Partnership Program.''; and
       (2) in subsection (h)(1), by inserting ``and activities 
     that counter threats posed by local, State, and transnational 
     criminal organizations drug smuggling and associated illicit 
     activities within and on their borders, as'' after ``drug 
     demand reduction activities''.

     SEC. 1015. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) The stability and security of Mexico and the nations of 
     Central America have a direct impact on the stability and 
     security of the United States.
       (2) Over the past decade, a ``balloon effect'' has pushed 
     increased violence and instability into Central America and 
     Mexico from South America.
       (3) Drug cartels and transnational criminal organizations 
     have spread throughout the region, causing instability and 
     lack of rule of law in many nations.
       (4) Illicit networks are used in a variety of illegal 
     activities including the movement of narcotics, humans, 
     weapons, and money.
       (5) According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and 
     Crime, Honduras has the highest murder rate in the world with 
     92 murders per 100,000 people.
       (6) Currently, Mexico is working to reduce violence created 
     by transnational criminal organizations and address issues 
     spurred by the emergence of internal self defense groups.
       (7) United States Northern Command and United States 
     Southern Command lead the efforts of the Department of 
     Defense in combating illicit networking in Mexico and Central 
     America.
       (8) To combat these destabilizing threats, through a 
     variety of authorities, the Department of Defense advises, 
     trains, educates, and equips vetted troops in Mexico and many 
     of the nations of Central America to build their militaries 
     and police forces, with an emphasis on human rights and 
     building partnership capacity.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Department of Defense should continue to focus on 
     combating illicit networking routes in Mexico and Central 
     America;
       (2) United States Northern Command and United States 
     Southern Command should continue to work together to combat 
     the transnational nature of these threats; and
       (3) the Department of Defense should increase its maritime, 
     aerial and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
     assets in the region in order to reduce the amount of illicit 
     networking flowing into the United States.

                Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

     SEC. 1021. DEFINITION OF COMBATANT AND SUPPORT VESSEL FOR 
                   PURPOSES OF THE ANNUAL PLAN AND CERTIFICATION 
                   RELATING TO BUDGETING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL 
                   VESSELS.

       Section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(4) The term `combatant and support vessel' means any 
     commissioned ship built or armed for naval combat or any 
     naval ship designed to provide support to combatant ships and 
     other naval operations. Such term does not include patrol 
     coastal ships, non-commissioned combatant craft specifically 
     designed for combat roles, or ships that are designated for 
     potential mobilization.''.

     SEC. 1022. NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND.

       (a) In General.--
       (1) Establishment of fund.--Chapter 131 of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund

       ``(a) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury 
     a fund to be known as the `National Sea-Based Deterrence 
     Fund'.
       ``(b) Administration of Fund.--The Secretary of Defense 
     shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of 
     this section.
       ``(c) Fund Purposes.--(1) Funds in the Fund shall be 
     available for obligation and expenditure only for the 
     advanced procurement or construction of nuclear-powered 
     strategic ballistic missile submarines.
       ``(2) Funds in the Fund may not be used for a purpose or 
     program unless the purpose or program is authorized by law.
       ``(d) Deposits.--There shall be deposited in the Fund all 
     funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal 
     years after fiscal year

[[Page 8634]]

     2016 for the advanced procurement or construction of nuclear-
     powered strategic ballistic missile submarines.
       ``(e) Expiration of Funds After 10 Years.--No part of an 
     appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to 
     subsection (d) shall remain available for obligation more 
     than 10 years after the end of the fiscal year for which 
     appropriated except to the extent specifically provided by 
     law.
       ``(f) Budget Requests.--Budget requests submitted to 
     Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount 
     requested for programs, projects, and activities for the 
     construction (including the design of vessels) of nuclear-
     powered strategic ballistic missile submarines.
       ``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `Fund' means the National Sea-Based 
     Deterrence Fund established by subsection (a).
       ``(2) The term `nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile 
     submarine' means any nuclear-powered submarine owned, 
     operated, or controlled by the Department of Defense with the 
     primary mission of launching nuclear-armed ballistic 
     missiles.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 2218 the following new item:

       ``2218a. National sea-based deterrence fund.''.

       (b) Transfer Authority.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), and to the 
     extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of 
     Defense may transfer to the National Sea-Based Deterrence 
     Fund established by section 2218a of title 10, United States 
     Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), amounts not to exceed 
     $3,500,000,000 from unobligated funds authorized to be 
     appropriated for fiscal years 2014, 2015, or 2016 for the 
     Navy for shipbuilding and conversion, Navy, for the advanced 
     procurement or construction, purchase, or alteration of 
     nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines. The 
     transfer authority provided under this paragraph is in 
     addition to any other transfer authority provided to the 
     Secretary of Defense by law.
       (2) Availability.--Funds transferred to the National Sea-
     Based Deterrence Fund pursuant to paragraph (1) shall remain 
     available for the same period for which the transferred funds 
     were originally appropriated.

     SEC. 1023. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT THAT A QUALIFIED 
                   AVIATOR OR NAVAL FLIGHT OFFICER BE IN COMMAND 
                   OF AN INACTIVATED NUCLEAR-POWERED AIRCRAFT 
                   CARRIER BEFORE DECOMMISSIONING.

       Section 5942(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-
     powered aircraft carrier that has been inactivated for the 
     purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal.''.

     SEC. 1024. LIMITATION ON EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS UNTIL 
                   COMMENCEMENT OF PLANNING OF REFUELING AND 
                   COMPLEX OVERHAUL OF THE U.S.S. GEORGE 
                   WASHINGTON.

       Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated or otherwise made available under section 301 of 
     this Act for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for 
     fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended until the 
     Secretary of Defense obligates funds to commence the planning 
     and long lead time material procurement associated with the 
     refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George 
     Washington (CVN-73).

     SEC. 1025. SENSE OF CONGRESS RECOGNIZING THE ANNIVERSARY OF 
                   THE SINKING OF U.S.S. THRESHER.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) U.S.S. Thresher was first launched at Portsmouth Naval 
     Shipyard on July 9, 1960.
       (2) U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for 
     her final voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew of 16 
     officers, 96 sailors, and 17 civilians.
       (3) The mix of that crew reflects the unity of the naval 
     submarine service, military and civilian, in the protection 
     of the United States.
       (4) At approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while in 
     communication with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, and 
     approximately 220 miles off the coast of New England, U.S.S. 
     Thresher began her final descent.
       (5) U.S.S. Thresher was declared lost with all hands on 
     April 10, 1963.
       (6) In response to the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, the United 
     States Navy instituted new regulations to ensure the health 
     of the submariners and the safety of the submarines of the 
     United States.
       (7) Those regulations led to the establishment of the 
     Submarine Safety and Quality Assurance program (SUBSAFE), now 
     one of the most comprehensive military safety programs in the 
     world.
       (8) SUBSAFE has kept the submariners of the United States 
     safe at sea ever since as the strongest, safest submarine 
     force in history.
       (9) Since the establishment of SUBSAFE, no SUBSAFE-
     certified submarine has been lost at sea, which is a legacy 
     owed to the brave individuals who perished aboard U.S.S. 
     Thresher.
       (10) From the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, there arose in the 
     institutions of higher education in the United States the 
     ocean engineering curricula that enables the preeminence of 
     the United States in submarine warfare.
       (11) The crew of U.S.S. Thresher demonstrated the ``last 
     full measure of devotion'' in service to the United States, 
     and this devotion characterizes the sacrifices of all 
     submariners, past and present.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
       (1) recognizes the 51st anniversary of the sinking of 
     U.S.S. Thresher;
       (2) remembers with profound sorrow the loss of U.S.S. 
     Thresher and her gallant crew of sailors and civilians on 
     April 10, 1963; and
       (3) expresses its deepest gratitude to all submariners on 
     ``eternal patrol'', who are forever bound together by 
     dedicated and honorable service to the United States of 
     America.

     SEC. 1026. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR 
                   INACTIVATION OF TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR 
                   DOCK LANDING SHIPS.

       (a) Limitation on the Availability of Funds.--Except as 
     otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 
     available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 
     may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, 
     inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing 
     ship.
       (b) Cruiser Upgrades.--As provided by section 8107 of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76), 
     the Secretary of the Navy shall begin the upgrade of two 
     cruisers during fiscal year 2015, including--
       (1) hull, mechanical, and electrical upgrades; and
       (2) combat systems modernizations.

                      Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

     SEC. 1031. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE REWARDS FOR 
                   COMBATING TERRORISM.

       Section 127b(c)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2015''.

     SEC. 1032. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY 
                   FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE 
                   DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 
                   STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

       (a) In General.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated 
     or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 
     be used during the period beginning on the date of the 
     enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to 
     construct or modify any facility in the United States, its 
     territories, or possessions to house any individual detained 
     at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment 
     in the custody or under the control of the Department of 
     Defense unless authorized by Congress.
       (b) Exception.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not 
     apply to any modification of facilities at United States 
     Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
       (c) Individual Detained at Guantanamo Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' means 
     any individual located at United States Naval Station, 
     Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who--
       (1) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of 
     the Armed Forces of the United States; and
       (2) is--
       (A) in the custody or under the control of the Department 
     of Defense; or
       (B) otherwise under detention at United States Naval 
     Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

     SEC. 1033. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER 
                   OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 
                   STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

       No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available to the Department of Defense may be used during the 
     period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
     ending on December 31, 2015, to transfer, release, or assist 
     in the transfer or release to or within the United States, 
     its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or 
     any other detainee who--
       (1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed 
     Forces of the United States; and
       (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United 
     States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department 
     of Defense.

         Subtitle E--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

     SEC. 1041. MODIFICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY 
                   FOR HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ASSISTANCE AND 
                   STOCKPILED CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ASSISTANCE 
                   PROGRAMS.

       (a) Inclusion of Information About Insufficient Funding in 
     Annual Report.--Subsection (d)(3) of section 407 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended by inserting ``or insufficient 
     funding'' after ``such activities'';
       (b) Definition of Stockpiled Conventional Munitions 
     Assistance.--Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended--
       (1) by striking ``and includes'' and inserting the 
     following: ``small arms, and light weapons, including man-
     portable air-defense systems. Such term includes''; and
       (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
     following: ``, small arms, and light weapons, including man-
     portable air-defense systems''.

     SEC. 1042. AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT VOLUNTARY SERVICES OF LAW 
                   STUDENTS AND PERSONS STUDYING TO BE PARALEGALS.

       Section 1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(10) Internship or externship services provided by law 
     students or persons studying to be

[[Page 8635]]

     a paralegal, when such services are provided under the direct 
     supervision of an attorney.''.

     SEC. 1043. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO 
                   USE THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REIMBURSEMENT 
                   RATE FOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROVIDED TO 
                   CERTAIN NON-DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENTITIES.

       (a) Eligible Categories of Transportation.--Subsection (a) 
     of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
     ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``Subject to subsection (b), 
     the Secretary'';
       (2) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) by striking ``During the period beginning on October 
     28, 2009, and ending on September 30, 2019, for'' and 
     inserting ``For'';
       (B) by striking ``of Defense'' the first place it appears 
     and all that follows through ``military sales'' and inserting 
     ``of Defense''; and
       (C) by striking ``, but only if'' and all that follows 
     through ``commercial transportation industry''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
       ``(4) For military transportation services provided in 
     support of foreign military sales.
       ``(5) For military transportation services provided to a 
     State, local, or tribal agency (including any organization 
     composed of State, local, or tribal agencies).
       ``(6) For military transportation services provided to a 
     Department of Defense contractor when transporting supplies 
     that are for, or destined for, a Department of Defense 
     entity.''.
       (b) Termination of Authority for Certain Categories of 
     Transportation.--Such section is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsection (b):
       ``(b) Termination of Authority for Certain Categories of 
     Transportation.--The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), 
     and (6) of subsection (a) shall apply only to military 
     transportation services provided before October 1, 2024.''.
       (c) Clerical Amendments.--
       (1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is 
     amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-
       Department of Defense agencies and entities: Use of 
       Department of Defense reimbursement rate''.

       (2) Table of sections.--The item relating to such section 
     in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of 
     such title is amended to read as follows:

``2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of 
              Defense agencies and entities: Use of Department of 
              Defense reimbursement rate.''.

     SEC. 1044. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY RELATING TO USE OF MILITARY 
                   INSTALLATIONS BY CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET 
                   CONTRACTORS.

       (a) Repeal.--Section 9513 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is repealed.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 931 of such title is amended by striking 
     the item relating to section 9513.

     SEC. 1045. CERTIFICATION AND LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF 
                   FUNDS FOR AVIATION FOREIGN INTERNAL DEFENSE 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) Certification.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a 
     certification regarding the aviation foreign internal defense 
     program that includes each of the following:
       (A) An overall description of the program, included 
     validated requirements from each of the geographic combatant 
     commands and the Joint Staff, and statutory authorities used 
     to support fixed and rotary wing aviation foreign internal 
     defense programs within the Department of Defense.
       (B) Program goals, proposed metrics of performance success, 
     and anticipated procurement and operation and maintenance 
     costs across the Future Years Defense Program.
       (C) A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying 
     contributing commands and units for program execution, 
     including the use of Air Force, Special Operations Command, 
     Reserve, and National Guard forces and components.
       (D) The results of any analysis of alternatives and 
     efficiencies reviews for any contracts awarded to support the 
     aviation foreign internal defense program.
       (E) Any other items the Secretary of Defense determines 
     appropriate.
       (2) Form.--The certification required under paragraph (1) 
     shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.
       (b) Limitations.--
       (1) Limitations on the use of funds.--None of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 
     available for fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended 
     to support the aviation foreign internal defense program, or 
     to retire, transfer, or divest any asset of such program, 
     until the date that is 45 days after the date on which the 
     Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense 
     committees the certification required under subsection (a).
       (2) Limitation on disposition of aircraft.--No aircraft 
     that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is part of 
     the aviation foreign internal defense program may be 
     transferred into or maintained in a status that is considered 
     excess to the requirements of the possessing command and 
     awaiting disposition instructions.

     SEC. 1046. SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES AND REPORT RELATING TO 
                   SENSITIVE MILITARY OPERATIONS.

       Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Office 
     of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations 
     and Low Intensity Conflict, not more than 75 percent may be 
     obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits 
     to the congressional defense committees--
       (1) the procedures required to be submitted by section 
     130f(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code; and
       (2) the report required to be submitted under section 1043 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 857).

     SEC. 1047. LIMITATION ON USE OF RUSSIAN-FLAGGED AIRLIFT 
                   AIRCRAFT TO SUPPORT THE AIRLIFT MOVEMENT 
                   REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES 
                   TRANSPORTATION COMMAND.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available to the Secretary of Defense for 
     fiscal year 2015 may be used to fly any Russian-flagged 
     airlift aircraft to support any airlift movement requirement 
     of the United States Transportation Command until the 
     commander of the United States Transportation Command 
     certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 
     and House of Representatives that with respect to the airlift 
     movement requirement, using the Russian-flagged airlift 
     aircraft is the only means available to the commander to 
     execute the requirement.

     SEC. 1048. PROHIBITION ON REDUCTION OF FORCE STRUCTURE AT 
                   LAJES AIR FORCE BASE UNTIL COMPLETION OF 
                   ASSESSMENTS BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND 
                   GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE.

       The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force 
     structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, Portugal, below 
     the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 
     2013, until 30 days after the following occur:
       (1) The Secretary of Defense concludes the European 
     Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the 
     Secretary on January 25, 2013.
       (2) The Secretary briefs the congressional defense 
     committees regarding such Assessment, including a specific 
     assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base in 
     supporting the United States overseas force posture.
       (3) The Comptroller General of the United States reviews 
     and validates the results of such Assessment and conducts an 
     independent assessment of the possible operational 
     capabilities of Lajes Air Force Base.

     SEC. 1049. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL OF C-130 AIRCRAFT.

       The Secretary of the Air Force may not remove C-130 
     aircraft from a unit of the regular or reserve components of 
     the Air Force that is tasked with the modular airborne fire 
     fighting system mission, or from a unit that is formally 
     associated with a unit that is tasked with such mission, 
     until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force 
     certifies to the congressional defense committees that such 
     mission will not be negatively affected by the removal of 
     such aircraft.

     SEC. 1050. CONDITIONS ON ARMY NATIONAL GUARD AND ACTIVE ARMY 
                   FORCE STRUCTURE CHANGES PENDING COMPTROLLER 
                   GENERAL REPORT.

       (a) Certain Reductions Prohibited.--During fiscal year 
     2015, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army 
     may not carry out any of the following actions:
       (1) Reduce the end strength for active duty personnel of 
     the Army for a fiscal year below 490,000.
       (2) Reduce the end strength for Selected Reserve personnel 
     of the Army National Guard of the United States for a fiscal 
     year below 350,000.
       (3) Transfer AH-64 Attack helicopters from the Army 
     National Guard to the regular Army.
       (b) Report Required.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the 
     Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report containing a review 
     of the analyses of any counter-proposals submitted to the 
     Army by the Chief of the National Guard and conducted by the 
     Army and the Department of Defense Cost Assessment Program 
     Evaluation Office as the basis for the decision to determine 
     the future force structure of the Army, including the 
     appropriate mix between regular Army, the National Guard, and 
     the Army Reserve.
       (c) Elements of Report.--The report required by subsection 
     (b) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
       (1) An assessment of the force structure model used to 
     conduct the analysis and determination of whether proper 
     assumptions were made based on the current budget program, 
     the National Military Strategy, and Combatant Commanders' 
     operational requirements for the Army.
       (2) An assessment of the cost analysis models used to make 
     the determinations regarding which Army aviation platforms 
     should be retained and in which component, including the 
     projected costs and savings associated with the 
     determinations.
       (3) A comparison of the operational readiness rates for the 
     past five years for the equipment platforms that comprise 
     aviation brigades of the regular Army and the Army National 
     Guard.

[[Page 8636]]

       (4) An assessment of the manning levels required for combat 
     aviation brigades in the regular Army and the Army National 
     Guard, including whether the resources to fund full-time 
     support of military technicians was properly applied to fill 
     the authorized positions in States with aviation brigades.
       (d) No Limitation on Aviation Training.--Nothing in 
     subsection (a) shall be construed--
       (1) to limit the provision of qualification training for 
     military occupational specialties related to Army Aviation; 
     or
       (2) to prevent the Secretary of the Army from continuing 
     flight training and advanced qualification courses for 
     selected National Guard AH-64 personnel in accordance with 
     current force structure and Army readiness requirements.
       (e) Sense of Congress Regarding Additional Funding for the 
     Army National Guard.--Congress is concerned with the planned 
     reductions and realignments the Army has proposed with 
     respect to aviation realignment of combat aviation aircraft 
     in the Army National Guard as well as greater reductions in 
     active component end strength and brigade combat teams.

                    Subtitle F--Studies and Reports

     SEC. 1061. PROTECTION OF DEFENSE MISSION-CRITICAL 
                   INFRASTRUCTURE FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE AND 
                   HIGH-POWERED MICROWAVE SYSTEMS.

       (a) Certification Required.--Not later than June 1, 2015, 
     the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees certification that defense mission-
     critical infrastructure requiring electromagnetic pulse 
     protection that receives power supply from commercial or 
     other non-military sources is protected from the adverse 
     effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic 
     pulse and high-powered microwave weapons.
       (b) Form of Submission.--The certification required by 
     subsection (a) shall be submitted in classified form.
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``defense mission-critical infrastructure'' 
     means Department of Defense infrastructure of defense 
     critical systems essential to project, support, and sustain 
     the Armed Forces and military operations worldwide.
       (2) The term ``defense critical system'' means a primary 
     mission system or an auxiliary or supporting system--
       (A) the operational effectiveness and operational 
     suitability of which are essential to the successful mission 
     completion or to aggregate residual combat capability; and
       (B) the failure of which would likely result in the failure 
     to complete a mission.

     SEC. 1062. RESPONSE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO 
                   COMPROMISES OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) Compromises of classified information cause 
     indiscriminate and long-lasting damage to United States 
     national security and often have a direct impact on the 
     safety of warfighters.
       (2) In 2010, hundreds of thousands of classified documents 
     were illegally copied and disclosed across the Internet.
       (3) Classified information has been disclosed in numerous 
     public writings and manuscripts endangering current 
     operations.
       (4) In 2013, nearly 1,700,000 files were downloaded from 
     United States Government information systems, threatening the 
     national security of the United States and placing the lives 
     of United States personnel at extreme risk. The majority of 
     the information compromised relates to the capabilities, 
     operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures of the Armed 
     Forces of the United States, and is the single greatest 
     quantitative compromise in the history of the United States.
       (5) The Department of Defense is taking steps to mitigate 
     the harm caused by these leaks.
       (6) Congress must be kept apprised of the progress of the 
     mitigation efforts to ensure the protection of the national 
     security of the United States.
       (b) Reports Required.--
       (1) Initial report.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
     actions taken by the Secretary in response to significant 
     compromises of classified information. Such report shall 
     include each of the following:
       (A) A description of any changes made to Department of 
     Defense policies or guidance relating to significant 
     compromises of classified information, including regarding 
     security clearances for employees of the Department, 
     information technology, and personnel actions.
       (B) An overview of the efforts made by any task force 
     responsible for the mitigation of such compromises of 
     classified information.
       (C) A description of the resources of the Department that 
     have been dedicated to efforts relating to such compromises.
       (D) A description of the plan of the Secretary to continue 
     evaluating the damage caused by, and to mitigate the damage 
     from, such compromises.
       (E) A general description and estimate of the anticipated 
     costs associated with mitigating such compromises.
       (2) Updates to report.--During calendar years 2015 through 
     2018, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees semiannual updates to the report required by 
     paragraph (1). Each such update shall include information 
     regarding any changes or progress with respect to the matters 
     covered by such report.

     SEC. 1063. REPORT AND BRIEFING TO CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT AND 
                   INSPECTION OF ARMORED COMMERCIAL PASSENGER-
                   CARRYING VEHICLES TO TRANSPORT CIVILIAN 
                   EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) civilian employees of the Department of Defense should 
     be provided all reasonable protection while such employees 
     are in hostile foreign areas, and such protection should 
     include adequate armored commercial passenger-carrying 
     vehicle transportation; and
       (2) to ensure adequate protection of civilian employees, 
     the Department of Defense should employ stringent, uniform 
     standards for the procurement and inspection upon delivery of 
     armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles for use by 
     civilian employees overseas.
       (b) Report Required.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 
     in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the policies and 
     procedures of the Department of Defense for procuring and 
     inspecting upon delivery armored commercial passenger-
     carrying vehicles for transporting civilian employees. Such 
     report shall include--
       (1) a description of the policies and procedures of the 
     Department of Defense at the time of the report for procuring 
     and inspecting upon delivery armored commercial passenger-
     carrying vehicles for transporting civilian employees in 
     hostile or potentially hostile locations overseas;
       (2) recommendations for any changes to such policies and 
     procedures of the Department of Defense that the Secretary 
     determines would increase the safety of civilian employees in 
     hostile or potentially hostile locations overseas; and
       (3) any other relevant matter the Secretary determines 
     appropriate.
       (c) Briefing Required.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 
     in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall provide to the 
     congressional defense committees a detailed briefing on the 
     report required by subsection (b).

     SEC. 1064. STUDY ON JOINT ANALYTIC CAPABILITY OF THE 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

       (a) Independent Assessment.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     commission an independent assessment of the joint analytic 
     capabilities of the Department of Defense to support 
     strategy, plans, and force development and their link to 
     resource decisions.
       (b) Conduct of Assessment.--The assessment required by 
     subsection (a) may, at the election of the Secretary, be 
     conducted by an independent, non-governmental institute which 
     is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue 
     Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such 
     Code, and has recognized credentials and expertise in 
     national security and military affairs appropriate for the 
     assessment.
       (c) Elements.--The assessment required by subsection (a) 
     should include, but not be limited to, the following:
       (1) An assessment of the analytical capability of the 
     Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff to 
     support force planning, defense strategy development, program 
     and budget decisions, and the review of war plans.
       (2) Recommendations on improvements to such capability as 
     required, including changes to processes or organizations 
     that may be necessary
       (d) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of 
     the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to 
     the Secretary an unclassified report, with a classified annex 
     (if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the 
     assessment. Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt 
     of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the 
     congressional defense committees, together with such comments 
     on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate.

                       Subtitle G--Other Matters

     SEC. 1071. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.

       (a) Amendments To Title 10, United States Code, to Reflect 
     Enactment of Title 41, United States Code.--Title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended as follows:
       (1) Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking ``section 
     6101(b)-(d) of title 41'' and inserting ``section 6101 of 
     title 41''.
       (2) Section 2302 is amended--
       (A) in paragraph (7), by striking ``section 4 of such Act'' 
     and inserting ``such section''; and
       (B) in paragraph (9)(A)--
       (i) by striking ``section 26 of the Office of Federal 
     Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)'' and inserting 
     ``chapter 15 of title 41''; and
       (ii) by striking ``such section'' and inserting ``such 
     chapter''.
       (3) Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking ``section 
     4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act 
     (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i))'' and inserting ``section 103(3)(A) 
     of title 41''.
       (4) Section 2314 is amended by striking ``Sections 6101(b)-
     (d)'' and inserting ``Sections 6101''.
       (5) Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking ``section 
     35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 
     U.S.C. 431(c))'' and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''.
       (6) Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking ``section 
     4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     403)'' and inserting ``section 110 of title 41''.

[[Page 8637]]

       (7) Section 2379 is amended--
       (A) in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i), 
     by striking ``section 4(12) of the Office of Federal 
     Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))'' and inserting 
     ``section 103 of title 41''; and
       (B) in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking ``section 
     35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 
     U.S.C. 431(c))'' and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''.
       (8) Section 2410m(b)(1) is amended--
       (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``section 7 of such 
     Act'' and inserting ``section 7104(a) of such title''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``section 7 of the 
     Contract Disputes Act of 1978'' and inserting ``section 
     7104(a) of title 41''.
       (9) Section 2533(a) is amended by striking ``such Act'' in 
     the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting ``chapter 83 
     of such title''.
       (10) Section 2533b is amended--
       (A) in subsection (h)--
       (i) in paragraph (1), by striking ``sections 34 and 35 of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430 
     and 431)'' and inserting ``sections 1906 and 1907 of title 
     41''; and
       (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ``section 35(c) of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))'' 
     and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''; and
       (B) in subsection (m)--
       (i) in paragraph (2), by striking ``section 4 of the Office 
     of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)'' and 
     inserting ``section 105 of title 41'';
       (ii) in paragraph (3), by striking ``section 4 of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)'' 
     and inserting ``section 131 of title 41''; and
       (iii) in paragraph (5), by striking ``section 35(c) of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))'' 
     and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''.
       (11) Section 2545(1) is amended by striking ``section 4(16) 
     of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     403(16))'' and inserting ``section 131 of title 41''.
       (12) Section 7312(f) is amended by striking ``Section 3709 
     of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)'' and inserting 
     ``Section 6101 of title 41''.
       (b) Amendments to Other Defense-related Statutes to Reflect 
     Enactment of Title 41, United States Code.--
       (1) The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) is amended as follows:
       (A) Section 846(a) (10 U.S.C. 2534 note) is amended--
       (i) by striking ``the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et 
     seq.)'' and inserting ``chapter 83 of title 41, United States 
     Code''; and
       (ii) by striking ``that Act'' and inserting ``that 
     chapter''.
       (B) Section 866 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended--
       (i) in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking ``section 26 of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     422)'' and inserting ``chapter 15 of title 41, United States 
     Code''; and
       (ii) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking ``section 4(13) 
     of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     403(13))'' and inserting ``section 110 of title 41, United 
     States Code''.
       (C) Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by 
     striking ``section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement 
     Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)'' and inserting ``chapter 15 of 
     title 41, United States Code''.
       (2) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2008 (Public Law 110-181) is amended as follows:
       (A) Section 805(c)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended--
       (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``section 4(12)(E) of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     403(12)(E))'' and inserting ``section 103(5) of title 41, 
     United States Code''; and
       (ii) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking ``section 4(12)(F) 
     of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     403(12)(F))'' and inserting ``section 103(6) of title 41, 
     United States Code''.
       (B) Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by 
     striking ``section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement 
     Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))'' and inserting ``section 103 
     of title 41, United States Code''.
       (C) Section 847 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended--
       (i) in subsection (a)(5), by striking ``section 27(e) of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     423(e))'' and inserting ``section 2105 of title 41, United 
     States Code'';
       (ii) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``section 4(16) of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act'' and inserting 
     ``section 131 of title 41, United States Code''; and
       (iii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``section 27 of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)'' 
     and inserting ``chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code''.
       (D) Section 862 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended--
       (i) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``section 25 of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421)'' 
     and inserting ``section 1303 of title 41, United States 
     Code''; and
       (ii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``section 6(j) of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     405(j))'' and inserting ``section 1126 of title 41, United 
     States Code''.
       (3) The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364) is amended as follows:
       (A) Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by 
     striking ``section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965 
     (41 U.S.C. 357(b))'' and inserting ``section 6701(3) of title 
     41, United States Code''.
       (B) Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is 
     amended by striking ``section 4(12) of the Office of Federal 
     Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))'' and inserting 
     ``section 103 of title 41, United States Code''.
       (4) Section 8118 of the Department of Defense 
     Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-287; 10 U.S.C. 2533a 
     note), is amended by striking ``section 34 of the Office of 
     Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430)'' and 
     inserting ``section 1906 of title 41, United States Code''.
       (5) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2004 (Public Law 108-136) is amended as follows:
       (A) Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by 
     striking ``section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal 
     Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A))'' and 
     inserting ``section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States 
     Code''.
       (B) Subsection (c) of section 1601 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is 
     amended--
       (i) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``section 32A of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section 
     1443 of this Act'' and inserting ``section 1903 of title 41, 
     United States Code''; and
       (ii) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``Subsections (a) and 
     (b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 
     57(a) and (b))'' and inserting ``Section 8703(a) of title 41, 
     United States Code''.
       (6) Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense 
     Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-87; 10 U.S.C. 2410d 
     note), is amended by striking ``the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act 
     (41 U.S.C. 46-48)'' and inserting ``chapter 85 of title 41, 
     United States Code''.
       (7) Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314; 
     10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking ``section 
     26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act 
     (41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B))'' and inserting ``section 
     1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code''.
       (8) Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107; 10 U.S.C. 2330 
     note) is amended by striking ``section 16(3) of the Office of 
     Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))'' and 
     inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41, United States 
     Code''.
       (9) Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261; 
     10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking ``subsection 
     (b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and 
     Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b)'' and 
     inserting ``section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States 
     Code''.
       (10) Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 10 
     U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking ``section 32 of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428)'' 
     and inserting ``section 1902 of title 41, United States 
     Code''.
       (11) Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104-201; 
     10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking ``section 25(c) 
     of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     421(c))'' and inserting ``section 1303(a) of title 41, United 
     States Code''.
       (12) Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106, 10 U.S.C. 7420 
     note) is amended by striking ``section 303(c) of the Federal 
     Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 
     253(c))'' and inserting ``section 3304(a) of title 41, United 
     States Code''.
       (13) Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 
     note) is amended--
       (A) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking ``section 16(c) of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     414(c))'' and inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41, United 
     States Code,'';
       (B) in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking ``section 
     16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 
     U.S.C. 414(3))'' and inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41, 
     United States Code'';
       (C) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking ``section 4(12) of 
     the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     403(12))'' and inserting ``section 103 of title 41, United 
     States Code''; and
       (D) in subsection (h), by striking ``section 27 of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)'' 
     and inserting ``chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code''.
       (14) Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484; 
     10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking ``section 25(c) 
     of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
     421(c))'' and inserting ``section 1303(a) of title 41, United 
     States Code''.
       (15) Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102-190; 10 U.S.C. 
     2302 note) is amended--
       (A) in subsection (b), by striking ``section 4(12) of the 
     Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act'' and inserting 
     ``section 103 of title 41, United States Code''; and
       (B) in subsection (c)--
       (i) by striking ``section 25(a) of the Office of Federal 
     Procurement Policy Act'' and inserting ``section 1302(a) of 
     title 41, United States Code''; and
       (ii) by striking ``section 25(c)(1) of the Office of 
     Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.

[[Page 8638]]

     421(c)(1))'' and inserting ``section 1303(a)(1) of such title 
     41''.
       (16) Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510, 10 U.S.C. 2302 
     note) is amended--
       (A) by designating the subsection after subsection (k), 
     relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and
       (B) in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking ``the 
     first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46; 
     popularly known as the `Wagner-O'Day Act')'' and inserting 
     ``section 8502 of title 41, United States Code''.
       (c) Amendments to Title 10, United States Code, To Reflect 
     Reclassification of Provisions of Law Codified in Title 50, 
     United States Code.--Title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     as follows:
       (1) Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by 
     striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 
     3002)''.
       (2) Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1), 
     153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), 231a(c)(1), and 2501(a)(1)(A) are 
     amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 404a)'' and inserting ``(50 
     U.S.C. 3043)''.
       (3) Sections 167(g), 421(c), and 2557(c) are amended by 
     striking ``(50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.)'' and inserting ``(50 
     U.S.C. 3091 et seq.)''.
       (4) Section 201(b)(1) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 
     403-6(b))'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3041(b))''.
       (5) Section 429 is amended--
       (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``Section 102A of the 
     National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403-1)'' and 
     inserting ``section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 
     (50 U.S.C. 3024)''; and
       (B) in subsection (e), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))'' 
     and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))''.
       (6) Section 442(d) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 
     404e(a))'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3045(a))''.
       (7) Section 444 is amended--
       (A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 403o)'' 
     and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3515)''; and
       (B) in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 403a 
     et seq.)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)''.
       (8) Section 457 is amended--
       (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 431)'' and 
     inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3141)''; and
       (B) in subsection (c), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 431(b))'' 
     and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3141(b))''.
       (9) Sections 462, 1599a(a), and 1623(a) are amended by 
     striking ``(50 U.S.C. 402 note)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 
     3614)''.
       (10) Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), 496(a)(1), 2409(e)(1) 
     are amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))'' and inserting 
     ``(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))''.
       (11) Section 1605(a)(2) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 
     403r)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3518)''.
       (12) Section 2723(d)(2) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 
     413)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3091)''.
       (d) Amendments to Other Defense-Related Statutes To Reflect 
     Reclassification of Provisions of Law Codified in Title 50, 
     United States Code.--
       (1) The following provisions of law are amended by striking 
     ``(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 
     3003(4))'':
       (A) Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     10 U.S.C. 2271 note).
       (B) Sections 801(b)(3) and 911(e)(2) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 
     110-181; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note; 2271 note).
       (C) Section 812(e) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 10 U.S.C. 2501 
     note).
       (2) Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314; 
     10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401 
     et seq.)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.)''.
       (e) Date of Enactment References.--Title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended as follows:
       (1) Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking ``on the date 
     that is five years after the date of the enactment of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010'' and 
     inserting ``on October 28, 2014''.
       (2) Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking ``Not later 
     than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under'' 
     and inserting ``Under''.
       (3) Section 2275(d) is amended--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``before the date of the 
     enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013'' and inserting ``before January 2, 2013''; 
     and
       (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``on or after the date of 
     the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013'' and inserting ``on or after January 2, 
     2013''.
       (4) Section 2601a(e) is amended by striking ``after the 
     date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2012'' and inserting ``after December 31, 
     2011,''.
       (5) Section 6328(c) is amended by striking ``on or after 
     the date of the enactment of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010'' and inserting ``on 
     or after October 28, 2009,''.
       (f) Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code.--
     Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
       (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 130f and 
     inserting the following new item:

``130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.''.
       (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is 
     amended by inserting a period at the end of the item relating 
     to section 189.
       (3) Section 189(c)(1) is amended by striking ``139c'' and 
     inserting ``2430(a)''.
       (4) Section 407(a)(3)(A) is amended by striking the comma 
     after ``as applicable''.
       (5) Section 429 is amended--
       (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``Section'' in the 
     second sentence and inserting ``section''; and
       (B) in subsection (c), by striking ``act'' and inserting 
     ``law''.
       (6) Section 674(b) is amended by striking ``afer'' and 
     inserting ``after''.
       (7) Section 949i(b) is amended by striking ``,,'' and 
     inserting a comma.
       (8) Section 950b(B)(2)(A) is amended by striking ``give'' 
     and inserting ``given''.
       (9) Section 1040(a)(1) is amended by striking ``..'' and 
     inserting a period.
       (10) Section 1044(d)(2) is amended by striking ``..'' and 
     inserting a period.
       (11) Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking 
     ``subparagraph'' in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and 
     inserting ``subparagraphs''.
       (12) Section 1154(a)(2)(A)(ii) is amended by striking 
     ``U.S.C.1411'' and inserting ``U.S.C. 1411''.
       (13) Section 2222(g)(3) is amended by striking ``(A)'' 
     after ``(3)''.
       (14) Section 2335(d) is amended--
       (A) by designating the last sentence of paragraph (2) as 
     paragraph (3); and
       (B) in paragraph (3), as so designated--
       (i) by inserting before ``each of'' the following paragraph 
     heading: ``Other terms.--''.
       (ii) by striking ``the term'' and inserting ``that term''; 
     and
       (iii) by striking ``Federal Campaign'' and inserting 
     ``Federal Election Campaign''.
       (15) Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking ``section 
     2366a(a)(4)'' and inserting ``section 2366a(a)(6)''.
       (16) Section 2601a is amended--
       (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``issue'' and 
     inserting ``prescribe''; and
       (B) in subsection (d), by striking ``issued'' and inserting 
     ``prescribed''.
       (17) Section 2853(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking ``can be 
     still be'' and inserting ``can still be''.
       (18) Section 2866(a)(4)(A) is amended by striking 
     ``repayed'' and inserting ``repaid''.
       (19) Section 2884(c) is amended by striking ``on 
     evaluation'' in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and 
     inserting ``an evaluation''.
       (20) Section 7292(d)(2) is amended by striking ``section 
     1024(a)'' and inserting ``section 1018(a)''.
       (g) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2014.--Effective as of December 23, 2013, and as if included 
     therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66) is amended as 
     follows:
       (1) Section 2712 (127 Stat. 1004) is repealed.
       (2) Section 2809(a) (127 Stat. 1013) is amended by striking 
     ``subjection'' and inserting ``subsection''.
       (3) Section 2966 (127 Stat. 1042) is amended in the section 
     heading by striking ``TITLE'' and inserting ``ADMINISTRATIVE 
     JURISDICTION''.
       (4) Section 2971(a) (127 Stat. 1044) is amended--
       (A) by striking ``the map'' and inserting ``the maps''; and
       (B) by striking ``the mineral leasing laws, and the 
     geothermal leasing laws'' and inserting ``and the mineral 
     leasing laws''.
       (5) Section 2972(d)(1) (127 Stat. 1045) is amended--
       (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``public'' before 
     ``land''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``public''.
       (6) Section 2977(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1047) is amended by 
     striking ``; and'' and inserting a period.
       (h) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013.--Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included 
     therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking ``on the date of the 
     enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013'' and inserting ``on January 2, 2013,''.
       (i) Coordination With Other Amendments Made by This Act.--
     For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of 
     this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this 
     section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately 
     before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

     SEC. 1072. SALE OR DONATION OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR 
                   BORDER SECURITY ACTIVITIES.

       Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``counter-drug and 
     counter-terrorism activities'' and inserting ``counterdrug, 
     counterterrorism, and border security activities''
       (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``the Attorney General 
     and the Director of National Drug Control Policy'' and 
     inserting ``the Attorney General, the Director of National 
     Drug Control Policy, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, 
     as appropriate.''; and
       (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``counter-drug and 
     counter-terrorism activities'' and inserting ``counterdrug, 
     counterterrorism, or border security activities''.

     SEC. 1073. REVISION TO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR AVIATION 
                   INSURANCE CLAIMS.

       (a) In General.--Section 44309 of title 49, United States 
     Code, is amended--

[[Page 8639]]

       (1) in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the 
     following new sentence: ``A civil action shall not be 
     instituted against the United States under this chapter 
     unless the claimant first presents the claim to the Secretary 
     of Transportation and such claim is finally denied by the 
     Secretary in writing and notice of the denial of such claim 
     is sent by certified or registered mail.''.
       (2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following 
     new subsection (c):
       ``(c) Time Requirements.--(1) Except as provided under 
     paragraph (2), an insurance claim made under this chapter 
     against the United States shall be forever barred unless it 
     is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation 
     within two years after the date on which the loss event 
     occurred. Any civil action arising out of the denial of such 
     a claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the 
     date of the mailing, by certified or registered mail, of 
     notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.
       ``(2)(A) For claims based on liability to persons with whom 
     the insured has no privity of contract, an insurance claim 
     made under the authority of this chapter against the United 
     States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in 
     writing to the Secretary of Transportation by not later than 
     the earlier of--
       ``(i) the date that is 60 days after the date on which 
     final judgment is entered by a tribunal of competent 
     jurisdiction; or
       ``(ii) the date that is six years after the date on which 
     the loss event occurred.
       ``(B) Any civil action arising out of the denial of such 
     claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the 
     date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice 
     of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.
       ``(3) A claim made under this chapter shall be deemed to be 
     administratively denied if the Secretary fails to make a 
     final disposition of the claim before the date that is 6 
     months after the date on which the claim is presented to the 
     Secretary, unless the Secretary makes a different agreement 
     with the claimant when there is good cause for an 
     agreement.''.
       (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
     shall apply with respect to a claim arising after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1074. PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE HUMAN TERRAIN SYSTEM.

       (a) Pilot Program Required.--The Secretary of the Army 
     shall carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary 
     uses the Human Terrain System assets in the Pacific Command 
     area of responsibility to support phase 0 shaping operations 
     and the theater security cooperation plans of the Commander 
     of the Pacific Command.
       (b) Limitation.--Not more than 12 full-time equivalent 
     personnel, or 12 full-time equivalent personnel for reach 
     back support, may be deployed into the Pacific command area 
     of responsibility to support the pilot program required by 
     subsection (a). The limitation under the preceding sentence 
     shall not apply to training or support functions required to 
     prepare personnel for participation in the pilot program.
       (c) Reports.--
       (1) Briefing.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall 
     provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on 
     the plan of the Secretary to carry out the program required 
     by subsection (a), including the milestones, metrics, 
     deliverables, and resources needed to execute such a pilot 
     program. In establishing the metrics for the pilot program, 
     the Secretary shall include the ability to measure the value 
     of the program in comparison to other analytic tools and 
     techniques.
       (2) Initial report.--Not later than one year after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
     the status of the pilot program. Such report shall include 
     the independent analysis and recommendations of the Commander 
     of the Pacific Command regarding the effectiveness of the 
     program and how it could be improved.
       (3) Final report.--Not later than December 1, 2016, the 
     Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a final report on the pilot program. Such 
     report shall include an analysis of the comparative value of 
     human terrain information relative to other analytic tools 
     and techniques, recommendations regarding expanding the 
     program to include other combatant commands, and any 
     improvements to the program and necessary resources that 
     would enable such an expansion.
       (d) Termination.--The authority to carry out a pilot 
     program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 
     2016.

     SEC. 1075. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND NATIONAL AIRSPACE.

       (a) Memoranda of Understanding.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a 
     memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense 
     entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized 
     under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 
     of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access 
     nonregulatory special use airspace if such access--
       (1) is used by the entity as part of such test range 
     program; and
       (2) does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary 
     or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the 
     Department of Defense.
       (b) Established Procedures.--The Secretary shall carry out 
     subsection (a) using the established procedures of the 
     Department of Defense with respect to entering into a 
     memorandum of understanding.
       (c) Construction.--A memorandum of understanding entered 
     into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-
     Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as 
     establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team 
     member of such entity in the test range program specified in 
     such subsection.

     SEC. 1076. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIFE AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF 
                   DR. JAMES R. SCHLESINGER.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) The Honorable Dr. James R. Schlesinger was born in New 
     York, New York, on February 15, 1929, graduated summa cum 
     laude from Harvard College in 1950 where he was elected Phi 
     Beta Kappa and awarded the Frederick Sheldon Travel 
     Fellowship, and subsequently received from Harvard University 
     his master's degree in 1952 and doctoral degree in 1956.
       (2) Dr. Schlesinger married Rachel Line Mellinger in 1954 
     and had eight children with her before she passed away in 
     1995.
       (3) Dr. Schlesinger is survived by his children Cora 
     Schlesinger, Charles Schlesinger, Ann Schlesinger, William 
     Schlesinger, Emily Schlesinger, Thomas Schlesinger, Clara 
     Schlesinger, and James Schlesinger, Jr., and eleven 
     grandchildren.
       (4) Dr. Schlesinger was a generous patron of the arts, 
     including helping significantly to establish the Rachel M. 
     Schlesinger Concert Hall and Arts Center in Arlington, 
     Virginia.
       (5) Dr. Schlesinger was a generous sponsor of higher 
     education, serving on the International Council at Harvard 
     University's Belfer Center, endowing the Julius Schlesinger 
     Professorship of Operations Management at New York 
     University's Stern School of Business and the James R. 
     Schlesinger Distinguished Professorship at the Miller Center 
     of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, and 
     sponsoring an ongoing music scholarship at Harvard College in 
     honor of his beloved wife.
       (6) Dr. Schlesinger was a distinguished statesman-scholar 
     of great integrity, intellect, and insight who dedicated his 
     life to protecting the security of the United States and 
     Western civilization and the liberty of all the people of the 
     United States throughout his highly-decorated and 
     distinguished career spanning seven decades--
       (A) serving as a professor of economics at the University 
     of Virginia from 1955 until 1963;
       (B) authoring numerous important scholarly and policy-
     related publications, including The Political Economy of 
     National Security: A Study of the Economic Aspect of the 
     Contemporary Power Struggle (1960), Defense Planning and 
     Budgeting: The Issue of Centralized Control (1968), American 
     Security and Energy Policy (1980), America at Century's End 
     (1989), and most recently, Minimum Deterrence: Examining the 
     Evidence (2013);
       (C) serving at the RAND Corporation from 1963 until 1969, 
     including as the director of strategic studies;
       (D) beginning service in the Federal Government in 1969, 
     leading on defense matters as the assistant director and 
     acting deputy director of the United States Bureau of the 
     Budget;
       (E) serving as a member and chairman of the Atomic Energy 
     Commission from 1971 until 1973, working tirelessly to 
     introduce extensive organization and management changes to 
     strengthen the regulatory performance of the Commission;
       (F) serving as Director of Central Intelligence in 1973, 
     focusing on the agency's adherence to its legislative 
     charter; and
       (G) becoming the Secretary of Defense in 1973 at age 44, a 
     position Dr. Schlesinger held until 1975, during which time 
     he--
       (i) authored the ``Schlesinger Doctrine'' that instituted 
     important reforms to strengthen the flexibility and 
     credibility of the United States nuclear deterrent to prevent 
     war, assure United States allies, and protect the liberties 
     all Americans enjoy; ensuring that the United States 
     maintained ``essential equivalence'' with the Soviet Union's 
     conventional military forces and surging nuclear 
     capabilities;
       (ii) lead the successful development of the A-10 close-air 
     support aircraft and the F-16 fighter; leading the Department 
     of Defense with great skill and prescience during the 1973 
     Yom Kippur War in which he was key to the United States 
     airlift that, according to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, 
     ``meant life for our people'';
       (iii) led the Department of Defense during the 1974 Cyprus 
     Crisis, the closing phase of the Indochina conflict, and the 
     1975 Mayaguez incident in which his actions helped save the 
     lives of captured Americans,
       (iv) consulted regularly with and was highly-regarded by 
     the uniformed military; and working tenaciously to strengthen 
     the morale of the military following the United States 
     withdrawal from Vietnam and to stem the defense budget cuts 
     in that challenging period.
       (7) In light of his realistic views of the Soviet Union's 
     power and intentions, Dr. Schlesinger was invited to China as 
     a private citizen in 1975 at the personal request of Mao 
     Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, and upon 
     Mao's death, was the only foreigner invited by the Chinese 
     leadership to lay a wreath at Mao's bier.
       (8) In 1976, President-elect Jimmy Carter invited Dr. 
     Schlesinger to serve as his special advisor on energy during 
     the difficult period of oil embargoes and fuel shortages to 
     establish a national energy policy and create the charter for

[[Page 8640]]

     the Department of Energy and subsequently to serve President 
     Carter as the first Secretary of Energy, successfully 
     initiating new conservation standards, gradual oil and 
     natural gas deregulation, and unifying the nation's approach 
     to energy policy with national security considerations.
       (9) Following his return to private life in 1979, Dr. 
     Schlesinger continued serving tirelessly to the end of his 
     life in a wide array of public service and civic positions, 
     including as a member of President Ronald Reagan's Commission 
     on Strategic Forces, a member of Virginia Governor Charles 
     Robb's Commission on Virginia's Future, Chairman of the Board 
     of Trustees for the Mitre Corporation, a member of the 
     Defense Policy Board and co-chair of studies for the Defense 
     Science Board, Chairman of the National Space-Based 
     Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Board, a Director of 
     Sandia Corporation, a Trustee of the Atlantic Council, Nixon 
     Center, and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, and an original 
     member of the Secretary of State's International Security 
     Advisory Board.
       (10) In the recent past, Dr. Schlesinger was appointed by 
     President George W. Bush to the Homeland Security Advisory 
     Board, invited by Secretary Robert Gates to lead the 
     ``Schlesinger Task Force'' to recommend measures to ensure 
     the highest levels of competence and control of the Nation's 
     nuclear forces, and invited by Congress to serve as the Vice 
     Chairman of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic 
     Posture of the United States to produce the 2009 study, 
     entitled ``America's Strategic Posture'', which served as the 
     blueprint for the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review of the 
     Department of Defense.
       (11) In addition to Dr. Schlesinger's earned doctorate from 
     Harvard University, he was awarded 13 honorary doctorates, 
     and was the recipient of numerous prestigious medals and 
     awards, including inter alia, the National Security Medal 
     presented by President Carter, the Defense Science Board's 
     Eugene G. Fubini Award, the United States Army Association's 
     George Catlett Marshall Medal, the Air Force Association's H. 
     H. Arnold Award, the Navy League's National Meritorious 
     Citation, the Society of Experimental Test Pilots' James H. 
     Doolittle Award, the Military Order of World Wars' 
     Distinguished Service Medal, the Air Force Association's 
     Lifetime Achievement Award, and the Henry M. Jackson 
     Foundation's Henry M. Jackson Award for Distinguished Public 
     Service.
       (12) Dr. Schlesinger's monumental contributions to the 
     security and liberty of the nation and Western civilization, 
     and to the betterment of his local community should serve as 
     an example to all people of the United States.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
       (1) has learned with profound sorrow and deep regret the 
     announcement of the death of the Honorable Dr. James R. 
     Schlesinger, former Secretary of Defense, Secretary of 
     Energy, and Director of Central Intelligence;
       (2) honors the legacy of Dr. Schlesinger's commitment to 
     the liberty and security of this Nation and the Western 
     community of nations, the betterment of his local community, 
     and his loving family;
       (3) extends its deepest condolences and sympathy to the 
     family, friends, and colleagues of Dr. Schlesinger who have 
     lost a beloved father, grandfather, and thoughtful leader;
       (4) honors Dr. Schlesinger's wisdom, discernment, 
     scholarship, and dedication to a life of public service that 
     greatly benefitted his community, country, and Western 
     civilization;
       (5) recognizes with great appreciation that while serving 
     as public servant under Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter, 
     Dr. Schlesinger contributed significantly, thoughtfully, and 
     directly to the betterment of United States policies and 
     practices in the areas of national defense, energy, and 
     intelligence;
       (6) recognizes with great appreciation that after returning 
     to private life, Dr. Schlesinger continued to serve the 
     Nation selflessly until his passing through his numerous 
     bipartisan contributions to the reasoned public discourse of 
     issues and his leadership on numerous high-level studies 
     sponsored by the White House, the Department of Defense, the 
     Department of State, and the United States Congress;
       (7) recognizes with great appreciation Dr. Schlesinger's 
     exemplary life guided by his commitment to the continuing 
     security and liberty of the United States, and by his honor, 
     duty, and devotion to country and family, scholarship, and 
     personal moral integrity; and
       (8) expresses profound respect and admiration for Dr. 
     Schlesinger and his exemplary legacy of commitment to the 
     people of the United States, members of the Armed Forces, and 
     all those who help safeguard the Nation.

     SEC. 1077. REFORM OF QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.

       (a) In General.--
       (1) Reform.--Section 118 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 118. Defense Strategy Review

       ``(a) Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends 
     Report.--
       ``(1) Report required.--Each year following a year evenly 
     divisible by four, on the date on which the President submits 
     the budget for the next fiscal year to Congress under section 
     1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees a report (to be known as 
     the `Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends 
     Report') on United States national security interests and 
     threats and trends that could affect those interests. The 
     report shall be developed in full consultation with the 
     Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
       ``(2) Timeframes.--The report shall consider the following 
     three general timeframes:
       ``(A) Near-term (5 years).
       ``(B) Mid-term (10 to 15 years).
       ``(C) Far-term (20 years).
       ``(3) Contents of the report.--
       ``(A) The report required under this subsection shall 
     include a discussion of United States national security 
     interests consistent with the President's most recently 
     submitted National Security Strategy prescribed by the 
     President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security 
     Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043).
       ``(B) The report required under this subsection shall 
     include a discussion of the current and future security 
     environment, including assessed threats, trends, and possible 
     developments that could affect the national security 
     interests of the United States. Such areas of discussion 
     shall include, at a minimum--
       ``(i) geopolitical changes;
       ``(ii) military capabilities;
       ``(iii) technology developments;
       ``(iv) demographic changes; and
       ``(v) other trends the Secretary considers to be 
     significant.
       ``(C) The report required under this subsection shall 
     include a list of current and possible future threats to 
     United States national security interests. The threats 
     included in the list shall be categorized by their 
     likelihood, imminence, and potential severity, and shall 
     include only those threats the Department of Defense would 
     likely have a role in preventing, combating, or otherwise 
     addressing.
       ``(4) Form.--The report required under this subsection 
     shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.
       ``(b) National Defense Panel.--
       ``(1) Establishment.--Not later than February 1 of a year 
     following a year evenly divisible by four, there shall be 
     established an independent panel to be known as the National 
     Defense Panel (in this subsection referred to as the 
     `Panel'). The Panel shall have the duties set forth in this 
     subsection.
       ``(2) Membership.--The Panel shall be composed of ten 
     members from private civilian life who are recognized experts 
     in matters relating to the national security of the United 
     States. Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows:
       ``(A) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the House of Representatives.
       ``(B) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate.
       ``(C) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the House of Representatives.
       ``(D) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate.
       ``(3) Co-chairs of the panel.--In addition to the members 
     appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall 
     appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as 
     co-chairs of the panel.
       ``(4) Period of appointment; vacancies.--Members shall be 
     appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the Panel 
     shall be filled in the same manner as the original 
     appointment.
       ``(5) Duties.--
       ``(A) Quadrennial national security threats and trends 
     report.--The Panel shall have the following duties with 
     respect to a quadrennial national security threats and trends 
     report submitted under subsection (a):
       ``(i) Review the report and suggest additional threats, 
     trends, developments, opportunities, and challenges that 
     should be addressed in the Defense Strategy Review required 
     under subsection (c).
       ``(ii) Discuss the role of the United States in the world, 
     with particular attention to the role of the United States 
     military and the Department of Defense, including a 
     prioritized list of United States national security 
     interests.
       ``(iii) Outline a defense strategy to address the threats, 
     trends, developments, opportunities, and challenges suggested 
     under clause (i), in particular discussing prioritized ends 
     and ways and means to address the threats so outlined.
       ``(iv) Determine the kind and degree of risk that is 
     acceptable to the United States in undertaking the various 
     military missions under the strategy outlined in clause (iii) 
     and discuss ways of mitigating such risk.
       ``(v) Provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in 
     the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it 
     considers appropriate for their consideration.
       ``(B) Defense strategy review.--The Panel shall have the 
     following duties with respect to a Defense Strategy Review 
     conducted under subsection (c):
       ``(i) Assess the report on the Defense Strategy Review 
     submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 
     (c)(3).
       ``(ii) Assess the assumptions, strategy, findings, and 
     risks of the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted 
     under subsection (c)(3).
       ``(iii) Consider alternative defense strategies.
       ``(iv) Consider alternatives in force structure and 
     capabilities, presence, infrastructure, readiness, personnel 
     composition and skillsets, organizational structures, budget 
     plans, and other elements of the defense program of the 
     United States to execute successfully the full range of 
     missions called for in the Defense Strategy Review and in the 
     alternative strategies considered under clause (iii).
       ``(v) Provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in 
     the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it 
     considers appropriate for their consideration.

[[Page 8641]]

       ``(6) First meeting.--If the Secretary of Defense has not 
     made the Secretary's appointments to the Panel under 
     paragraph (3) by March 1 of a year in which a quadrennial 
     national security threats and trends report is submitted 
     under this section, the Panel shall convene for its first 
     meeting with the remaining members.
       ``(7) Reports.--
       ``(A) Not later than July 1 of a year in which a Panel is 
     established under paragraph (1), the Panel shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees a report on the Panel's 
     review of the quadrennial national security threats and 
     trends report, as required by paragraph (5)(A).
       ``(B) Not later than three months after the date on which 
     the report on a Defense Strategy Review is submitted under 
     subsection (c), the Panel shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report on the Panel's assessment of such 
     Defense Strategy Review, as required by paragraph (5)(B).
       ``(8) Administrative provisions.--
       ``(A) The Panel may request directly from the Department of 
     Defense and any of its components such information as the 
     Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this 
     subsection. The head of the department or agency concerned 
     shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure that information 
     requested by the Panel under this paragraph is promptly 
     provided to the maximum extent practical.
       ``(B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall make available to the Panel the services of any 
     federally funded research and development center that is 
     covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Department of 
     Defense.
       ``(C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided in 
     section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the 
     conditions set forth in such section.
       ``(D) Funds for activities of the Panel shall be provided 
     from amounts available to the Department of Defense.
       ``(9) Termination.--A Panel established under paragraph (1) 
     shall terminate 45 days after the date on which the Panel 
     submits its report on a Defense Strategy Review under 
     paragraph (7)(B).
       ``(c) Defense Strategy Review.--
       ``(1) Review required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     every four years, during a year following a year evenly 
     divisible by four, conduct a comprehensive examination (to be 
     known as a `Defense Strategy Review') of the national defense 
     strategy, force structure, force modernization plans, 
     infrastructure, budget plan, and other elements of the 
     defense program and policies of the United States with a view 
     toward determining and expressing the defense strategy of the 
     United States and establishing a defense program. Each such 
     Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted in consultation 
     with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
       ``(2) Conduct of review.--Each Defense Strategy Review 
     shall be conducted so as to--
       ``(A) delineate a national defense strategy consistent with 
     the most recent National Security Strategy prescribed by the 
     President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security 
     Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);
       ``(B) provide the mechanism for--
       ``(i) setting priorities, shaping the force, guiding 
     capabilities and resources, and adjusting the organization of 
     the Department of Defense to respond to changes in the 
     strategic environment;
       ``(ii) ensuring that entities within the Department of 
     Defense are working toward common goals; and
       ``(iii) engaging Congress, other United States Government 
     stakeholders, allies and partners, and the private sector on 
     such strategy;
       ``(C) provide a bridge between higher-level policy and 
     strategy and other Department of Defense guidance and 
     activities;
       ``(D) consider three general timeframes of the near-term 
     (associated with the future-years defense program), mid-term 
     (10 to 15 years), and far-term (20 years);
       ``(E) address the security environment, threats, trends, 
     opportunities, and challenges;
       ``(F) define the force structure and capabilities, force 
     modernization plans, presence, infrastructure, readiness, 
     personnel composition and skillsets, organizational 
     structures, and other elements of the defense program of the 
     United States associated with that national defense strategy 
     that would be required to execute successfully the full range 
     of missions called for in that national defense strategy;
       ``(G) identify the budget plan that would be required to 
     provide sufficient resources to execute successfully the full 
     range of missions called for in that national defense 
     strategy;
       ``(H) define the nature and magnitude of the strategic and 
     operational risks associated with executing the national 
     defense strategy; and
       ``(I) understand the relationships and tradeoffs between 
     missions, risks, and resources.
       ``(3) Submission of report on defense strategy review to 
     congressional committees.--The Secretary shall submit a 
     report on each Defense Strategy Review to the Committees on 
     Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives. The report shall be submitted not later than 
     March 1 of the year following the year in which the review is 
     conducted. If the year in which the review is conducted is in 
     the second term of a President, the Secretary may submit an 
     update to the Defense Strategy Review report submitted during 
     the first term of that President.
       ``(4) Elements.--The report shall provide a comprehensive 
     discussion of the Review, including the following:
       ``(A) The national defense strategy of the United States.
       ``(B) The assumed or defined prioritized national security 
     interests of the United States that inform the national 
     defense strategy defined in the Review.
       ``(C) The assumed strategic environment, including the 
     threats, developments, trends, opportunities, and challenges 
     that affect the assumed or defined national security 
     interests of the United States, including those that were 
     examined for the purposes of the Review and those that were 
     considered in the development of the Quadrennial National 
     Security Threats and Trends Report required under subsection 
     (a).
       ``(D) The assumed steady state activities, crisis and 
     conflict scenarios, military end states, and force planning 
     construct examined in the review.
       ``(E) The prioritized missions of the armed forces under 
     the strategy and a discussion of the roles and missions of 
     the components of the armed forces to carry out those 
     missions.
       ``(F) The assumed roles and capabilities provided by other 
     United States Government agencies and by allies and partners.
       ``(F) The force structure and capabilities, presence, 
     infrastructure, readiness, personnel composition and 
     skillsets, organizational structures, and other elements of 
     the defense program that would be required to execute 
     successfully the full range of missions called for in the 
     strategy.
       ``(G) An assessment of the gaps and shortfalls between the 
     force structure, capabilities, and additional elements as 
     required by subparagraph (F) and the current elements in the 
     Department's existing program of record, and a prioritization 
     of those gaps and shortfalls.
       ``(H) An assessment of the risks assumed by the strategy, 
     including--
       ``(i) how the Department defines, categorizes, and measures 
     risk, such as strategic and operational risk; and
       ``(ii) the plan for mitigating major identified risks, 
     including the expected timelines for, and extent of, any such 
     mitigation, and the rationale for where greater risk is 
     accepted.
       ``(I) A sensitivity analysis, specifically to understand 
     the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and 
     resources.
       ``(J) Any other key assumptions and elements addressed in 
     the review or that the Secretary considers necessary to 
     include.
       ``(5) CJCS review.--(A) Upon the completion of each Review 
     under this subsection, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
     Staff shall prepare and submit to the Secretary of Defense 
     the Chairman's assessment of risks under the defense strategy 
     developed by the Review and a description of the capabilities 
     needed to address such risk. In preparing such assessment, 
     the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall consider the 
     threats and trends contained in the Quadrennial National 
     Security Threats and Trends Report required by subsection 
     (a), any additional threats considered as part of the Review 
     under this subsection (particularly those that are 
     categorized as likely, imminent, or severe), and any 
     additional threats the Chairman considers appropriate.
       ``(B) The Chairman's assessment shall be submitted to the 
     Secretary in time for the inclusion of the assessment in the 
     report on the Review under this subsection. The Secretary 
     shall include the Chairman's assessment, together with the 
     Secretary's comments, in the report in its entirety.
       ``(6) Form.--The report required under this subsection 
     shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The item relating to section 118 
     at the beginning of chapter 2 of such title is amended to 
     read as follows:
       ``118. Defense Strategy Review.''.
       (b) Repeal of Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review.--
       (1) Repeal.--Chapter 2 of such title is amended by striking 
     section 118b.
       (2) Conforming amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item 
     relating to section 118b.
       (c) Effective Date.--Section 118 of such title, as amended 
     by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section, 
     shall take effect on October 1, 2015.

     SEC. 1078. RESUBMISSION OF 2014 QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.

       (a) Requirement to Resubmit 2014 QDR.--Not later than 
     October 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 
     with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall, in 
     accordance with this section, resubmit to the Committees on 
     Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
     the report on the 2014 quadrennial defense review that was 
     submitted to such committees as required by section 118(d) of 
     title 10, United States Code,
       (b) Matters Covered.--The resubmitted report shall fully 
     address the elements required in subsections (a), (b)(3), and 
     (b)(4) of section 118 of such title, which specifically 
     include the following:
       (1) An articulation of a defense program for the next 20 
     years, consistent with the national defense strategy of the 
     United States determined and expressed in the 2014 
     quadrennial defense review.
       (2) An identification of (A) the budget plan that would be 
     required to provide sufficient resources to execute 
     successfully the full range of missions called for in that 
     national defense strategy at a low-to-moderate level of risk, 
     and (B) any additional resources (beyond those programmed in 
     the current future-years defense program) required to achieve 
     such a level of risk.

[[Page 8642]]

       (3) Recommendations that are not constrained to comply with 
     and are fully independent of the budget submitted to Congress 
     by the President pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 
     States Code.
       (c) Limitation on Funds.--Of the amounts authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for the Office of the Under Secretary of 
     Defense for Policy, not more than 75 percent may be obligated 
     or expended until the Secretary of Defense resubmits to the 
     congressional defense committees the 2014 quadrennial defense 
     report in accordance with this section.

     SEC. 1079. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING COUNTER-IMPROVISED 
                   EXPLOSIVE DEVICES.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) counter-improvised explosive device tactics, 
     techniques, and procedures used in Iraq and Afghanistan have 
     produced important technical data, lessons learned, and 
     enduring technology critical to mitigating the devastating 
     effects of improvised explosive devices, which have been the 
     leading cause of combat fatalities in the United States 
     Central Command area of operations since 2002, and whose use 
     are now expanding to other Global Combatant Commands area of 
     operations;
       (2) without the preservation of knowledge about counter-
     improvised explosive devices, the Nation could fail to take 
     full advantage of the hard earned lessons and investments of 
     the past decade of counter-improvised explosive device 
     operations to enhance warfighter readiness; and
       (3) the Department of Defense should remain dedicated to 
     retaining a knowledge base relating to counter-improvised 
     explosive devices to ensure lessons learned and investments 
     are maximized for future benefits.

     SEC. 1080. ENHANCING PRESENCE AND CAPABILITIES AND READINESS 
                   POSTURE OF UNITED STATES MILITARY IN EUROPE.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a plan that--
       (1) identifies the capabilities and capacities, including 
     with respect to cyber, special operations, and intelligence, 
     required by the Armed Forces of the United States to counter 
     or mitigate conventional, unconventional, and subversive 
     activities of the Russian Federation within the area of 
     responsibility of the United States European Command;
       (2) identifies the required capabilities and capacities 
     needed by the Armed Forces of the United States to meet 
     operations plan requirements for a response under Article 5 
     of the North Atlantic Treaty;
       (3) identifies any deficiencies in the readiness of the 
     Armed Forces of the United States in the area of the 
     responsibility of the United States European Command; and
       (4) recommends actions, resources, and timelines with 
     respect to correcting any deficiency identified under 
     paragraphs (1), (2), or (3).

     SEC. 1081. DETERMINATION AND DISCLOSURE OF TRANSPORTATION 
                   COSTS INCURRED BY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR 
                   CONGRESSIONAL TRIPS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

       (a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary.--In 
     the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of 
     the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out 
     official duties outside the United States for which the 
     Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall--
       (1) determine the cost of the transportation provided with 
     respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
       (2) not later than 10 days after completion of the trip 
     involved, provide a written statement of the cost--
       (A) to the Member, officer, or employee involved, and
       (B) to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
     Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, 
     officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a 
     Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
       (3) upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), 
     make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary's 
     official public website until the expiration of the 4-year 
     period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
       (b) Exceptions.--This section does not apply with respect 
     to any trip the sole purpose of which is to visit one or more 
     United States military installations or to visit United 
     States military personnel in a war zone (or both).
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Member.--The term ``Member'', with respect to the House 
     of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident 
     Commissioner to the Congress.
       (2) United states.--The term ``United States'' means the 
     several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of 
     Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
     Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any 
     other territory or possession of the United States.
       (d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect 
     to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to 
     any trip which began prior to such date.

                  TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

     SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 
                   LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE 
                   LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN 
                   EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS.

       Effective January 1, 2015, section 1101(a) of the Duncan 
     Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently 
     amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66), is further 
     amended by striking ``through 2014'' and inserting ``through 
     2015''.

     SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO 
                   GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO 
                   PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE.

       Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency 
     Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War 
     on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234; 
     120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 
     (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently 
     amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66), is further 
     amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2016''.

     SEC. 1103. REVISION TO LIST OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 
                   REINVENTION LABORATORIES.

       Section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2487; 10 
     U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(18) The Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and 
     Social Sciences.
       ``(19) The Space and Missile Defense Command Technical 
     Center.''.

     SEC. 1104. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR EXPERIMENTAL PERSONNEL 
                   PROGRAM FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

       (a) In General.--Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 
     (Public Law 105-261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by 
     striking subsections (e), (f) and (g).
       (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section is further 
     amended--
       (1) in the section heading, by striking ``experimental'' 
     and inserting ``alternative'';
       (2) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by striking ``During the program period specified in 
     subsection (e)(1), the'' and inserting ``The''; and
       (B) by striking ``experimental''; and
       (3) in subsection (d)(1)--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
     ``12-month period'' and inserting ``calendar year''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (A), striking ``fiscal year'' and 
     inserting ``calendar year''.

     SEC. 1105. TEMPORARY AUTHORITIES FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS AT 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING 
                   FACILITIES.

       Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) Students enrolled in scientific and engineering 
     programs.--The director of any STRL may appoint qualified 
     candidates enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate 
     instruction leading to a bachelor's or master's degree in a 
     scientific, technical, engineering or mathematical course of 
     study at an institution of higher education (as that term is 
     defined in section 101 and 102 of the Higher Education Act of 
     1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to positions described in paragraph 
     (3) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory 
     described in that paragraph without regard to the provisions 
     of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code 
     (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title).'';
       (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) Candidates enrolled in scientific and engineering 
     programs.--The positions described in this paragraph are 
     scientific and engineering positions that may be temporary or 
     term in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
     (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a 
     Department of Defense science and technology reinvention 
     laboratory.''; and
       (3) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection 
     (b)(3), with respect to appointment authority under 
     subsection (a)(3), the number equal to 5 percent of the total 
     number of scientific and engineering positions in such 
     laboratory that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year 
     last ending before the start of such calendar year.''.

     SEC. 1106. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 
                   DECISIONS RELATING TO WHISTLEBLOWERS.

       (a) In General.--Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United 
     States Code, is amended by striking ``2-year'' and inserting 
     ``5-year''.
       (b) Director Appeal.--Section 7703(d)(2) of such title is 
     amended by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.

[[Page 8643]]



             TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

                  Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

     SEC. 1201. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY 
                   FUND.

       (a) Revisions to Global Security Contingency Fund.--
     Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by striking 
     ``the provision of equipment, supplies, and training.'' and 
     inserting the following: ``the provision of the following:
       ``(A) Equipment.
       ``(B) Supplies.
       ``(C) With respect to amounts in the Fund appropriated or 
     transferred into the Fund after the date of the enactment of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, 
     small-scale construction not exceeding $750,000 on a per-
     project basis.
       ``(D) Training.''.
       (b) Availability of Funds.--Subsection (i) of such section 
     is amended--
       (1) by striking ``Amounts'' and inserting the following:
       ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
     amounts'';
       (2) by striking ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2016''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Exception.--Amounts appropriated or transferred to 
     the Fund before the date of the enactment of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 shall remain 
     available for obligation and expenditure after September 30, 
     2015, only for activities under programs commenced under 
     subsection (b) before September 30, 2015.''.
       (c) Expiration.--Subsection (p) of such section, as amended 
     by section 1202(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 894), is 
     further amended--
       (1) by striking ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2016'';
       (2) by striking ``fiscal years 2012 through 2015'' and 
     inserting ``fiscal years 2012 through 2016''; and
       (3) by adding at the end before the period the following: 
     ``and subject to the requirements contained in paragraphs (1) 
     and (2) of subsection (i)''.

     SEC. 1202. NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON CERTAIN ASSISTANCE UNDER 
                   AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE 
                   CAPABILITY OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO RESPOND TO 
                   INCIDENTS INVOLVING WEAPONS OF MASS 
                   DESTRUCTION.

       Section 1204(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 896; 10 
     U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by inserting after 
     ``congressional defense committees'' the following: ``and the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives''.

     SEC. 1203. ENHANCED AUTHORITY FOR PROVISION OF SUPPORT TO 
                   FOREIGN MILITARY LIAISON OFFICERS OF FOREIGN 
                   COUNTRIES WHILE ASSIGNED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE.

       (a) Eligibility.--Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``involved in 
     a military operation'' and all that follows and inserting 
     ``while such liaison officer is assigned temporarily to the 
     headquarters of a combatant command, component command, or 
     subordinate operational command of the United States.''.
       (b) Limitations.--Such section, as so amended, is further 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (f); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
     subsection (d):
       ``(d) Limitations.--The number of liaison officers 
     supported under subsection (b)(1) may not exceed 60 at any 
     one time, and the amount of unreimbursed support for any such 
     liaison officer under that subsection in any fiscal year may 
     not exceed $200,000 (in fiscal year 2014 constant 
     dollars).''.
       (c) Secretary of State Concurrence.--Such section, as so 
     amended, is further amended by inserting after subsection 
     (d), as added by subsection (b)(2) of this section, the 
     following new subsection (e):
       ``(e) Secretary of State Concurrence.--The authority of the 
     Secretary of Defense to provide administrative services and 
     support under subsection (a) for the performance of duties by 
     a liaison officer of another nation may be exercised only 
     with respect to a liaison officer of another nation whose 
     assignment as described in that subsection is accepted by the 
     Secretary of Defense with the concurrence of the Secretary of 
     State.''.
       (d) Definition.--Subsection (f) of such section, as 
     redesignated by subsection (d)(1) of this section, is further 
     amended by inserting ``training programs conducted to 
     familiarize, orient, or certify liaison officers regarding 
     unique aspects of the assignments of the liaison officers,'' 
     after ``police protection,''.
       (e) Annual Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later January 31, 2016, January 31, 
     2017, and January 31, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report that 
     includes a summary of the expenses, by command and associated 
     countries, incurred by the United States for those liaison 
     officers of a developing country in connection with the 
     assignment of that officer as described in subsection (a) of 
     section 1051(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 
     by subsection (a) of this section.
       (2) Definition.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall 
     also include the definition of and criteria established to 
     designate a country as a ``developing country'' for purposes 
     of such paragraph.
       (3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 
     submitted in an unclassified form, but may contain a 
     classified annex.

     SEC. 1204. ANNUAL REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS VETTING AND 
                   VERIFICATION PROCEDURES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE.

       (a) Report Required.--The Secretary of Defense, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees for each of the fiscal 
     years 2015 through 2019 a report on human rights vetting and 
     verification procedures used to comply with the requirements 
     of section 8057 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 
     (Public Law 113-76) or any successor requirements.
       (b) Matters to Be Included.--The report required by 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) An accounting and description of all training, 
     equipment, or other assistance that was approved or provided 
     to foreign security forces for the prior fiscal year for 
     which such vetting and verification procedures were required, 
     itemized by country and event.
       (2) An accounting and description of all training, 
     equipment, or other assistance that was not approved or 
     provided to foreign security forces for the prior fiscal year 
     by reason of not complying with such vetting and verification 
     procedures, itemized by country and event, including the 
     reasons for such non-compliance.
       (3) A description of any human rights, rule of law 
     training, or other assistance that was provided to foreign 
     security forces described in paragraph (2) for the prior 
     fiscal year for purposes of seeking to comply with such 
     vetting and verification procedures in the future, itemized 
     by country and event.
       (4) A description of any interagency processes that were 
     used to evaluate compliance with the requirements of section 
     8057 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 or any 
     successor requirements.
       (5) In the event the Secretary of Defense exercises the 
     authority under subsection (b) or (c) of section 8057 of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 or any successor 
     authority, a justification for the exercise of such authority 
     and an explanation of the specific benefits derived from the 
     exercise of such authority.
       (6) Any additional items the Secretary of Defense 
     determines to be appropriate.
       (c) Submission Requirements.--
       (1) In general.--The report required by subsection (a) 
     shall be submitted to the appropriate congressional 
     committees at the same time as the budget of the President is 
     submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United 
     States Code.
       (2) Form.--The report shall be submitted in unclassified 
     form and may include a classified annex if necessary.
       (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``appropriate 
     congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

        Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan

     SEC. 1211. EXTENSION OF COMMANDERS' EMERGENCY RESPONSE 
                   PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) One Year Extension.--Section 1201 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 
     1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 904), is further 
     amended by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' each place it 
     appears and inserting ``fiscal year 2015''.
       (b) Funds Available During Fiscal Year 2015.--Subsection 
     (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by 
     striking ``for operation and maintenance'' and inserting ``by 
     section 1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2015''.

     SEC. 1212. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF 
                   CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED 
                   TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS.

       (a) Extension of Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1233 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently 
     amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 905), 
     is further amended by striking ``fiscal year 2014 for 
     overseas contingency operations'' and inserting ``by section 
     1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2015''.
       (b) Extension of Notice Requirement Relating to 
     Reimbursement of Pakistan for Support Provided by Pakistan.--
     Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently 
     amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking ``September 
     30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.
       (c) Extension of Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan 
     Pending Certification on Pakistan.--Subsection (d) of section 
     1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended--

[[Page 8644]]

       (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``in Fiscal Year 
     2013''; and
       (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Effective as of the 
     date of the enactment of this Act,'' and all that follows 
     through ``remain available for obligation'' and inserting 
     ``No amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department 
     of Defense for fiscal year 2015 or any prior fiscal year''.

     SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN AUTHORITIES FOR SUPPORT OF 
                   FOREIGN FORCES SUPPORTING OR PARTICIPATING WITH 
                   THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Logistical Support for Coalition Forces Supporting 
     United States Military Operations in Afghanistan.--Section 
     1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 394), as most 
     recently amended by section 1217(a) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 909), is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and 
     inserting ``fiscal year 2015'';
       (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``December 31, 2014'' 
     and inserting ``December 31, 2015''; and
       (3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``December 31, 2014'' 
     and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
       (b) Use of Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements To 
     Lend Certain Military Equipment to Certain Foreign Forces for 
     Personnel Protection and Survivability.--Section 1202(e) of 
     the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most 
     recently amended by section 1217(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 909), is further amended by striking ``December 31, 
     2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.

     SEC. 1214. REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD SECURITY AND STABILITY 
                   IN AFGHANISTAN UNDER OPERATION RESOLUTE 
                   SUPPORT.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2015, and 
     every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a report on progress 
     toward security and stability in Afghanistan under the North 
     Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Operation Resolute 
     Support.
       (b) Matters to Be Included: Strategic Direction of United 
     States Activities Relating to Security and Stability in 
     Afghanistan Under Operation Resolute Support.--The report 
     required under subsection (a) shall include a description of 
     the mission and a comprehensive strategy of the United States 
     for security and stability in Afghanistan during Operation 
     Resolute Support, including any changes to the mission and 
     strategy over time. The description of such strategy shall 
     consist of a general overview and a separate detailed section 
     for each of the following:
       (1) NATO.--The status of the train, advise, and assist 
     mission under NATO's Operation Resolute Support.
       (2) ANSF.--A description of the following:
       (A) The strategy and budget, with defined objectives, for 
     activities relating to strengthening and sustaining the 
     resources, capabilities, and effectiveness of the Afghanistan 
     National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) 
     of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF), with the 
     goal of ensuring that a strong and fully-capable ANSF is able 
     to independently and effectively conduct operations and 
     maintain security and stability in Afghanistan by the end of 
     Operation Resolute Support.
       (B) Any actions of the United States and the Government of 
     Afghanistan to achieve the following goals relating to 
     sustaining the capacity of the ANSF and the results of such 
     actions:
       (i) Improve and sustain ANSF recruitment and retention, 
     including through vetting and salaries for the ANSF.
       (ii) Improve and sustain ANSF training and mentoring.
       (iii) Strengthen the partnership between the Government of 
     the United States and the Government of Afghanistan.
       (iv) Ensure international commitments to support the ANSF.
       (3) NATO bases in afghanistan.--A description of the 
     following:
       (A) The access arrangements, the specific locations, and 
     the force protection requirements for bases that the United 
     States has access to in Afghanistan.
       (B) A summary of attacks against NATO bases or facilities 
     and any challenges to force protection, such as ``green-on-
     blue'' attacks.
       (4) Public corruption and rule of law.--A description of 
     any actions, and the results of such actions, by the United 
     States, NATO, and the Government of Afghanistan to fight 
     public corruption and strengthen governance and the rule of 
     law at the local, provincial, and national levels.
       (5) Regional considerations.--A description of any actions 
     by the Government of Afghanistan to increase cooperation with 
     countries geographically located around Afghanistan's border, 
     with a particular focus on improving security and stability 
     in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border areas, and the status of 
     such actions.
       (c) Matters to Be Included: Performance Indicators, 
     Measures of Progress, and Any Unfulfilled Requirements Toward 
     Sustainable Long-term Security and Stability in Afghanistan 
     Under Operation Resolute Support.--
       (1) In general.--The report required under subsection (a) 
     shall set forth a comprehensive set of performance 
     indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled 
     requirements toward sustainable long-term security and 
     stability in Afghanistan, as specified in paragraph (2), and 
     shall include performance standards and goals, together with 
     a notional timetable for achieving such goals.
       (2) Performance indicators, measures of progress, and any 
     unfulfilled requirements specified.--The performance 
     indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled 
     requirements specified in this paragraph shall include, at a 
     minimum, the following:
       (A) An assessment of NATO train, advise, and assist mission 
     requirements. Such assessments shall include--
       (i) indicators of the efficacy of the train, advise, and 
     assist mission, such as number of engagements with the ANSF 
     per day, a description of the engagements with the ANSF, and 
     trends in the marginal improvements in the functional areas 
     of the ANSF support structure from the tactical to the 
     ministerial level;
       (ii) contractor support requirements for the train, advise, 
     and assist mission and for the ANSF; and
       (iii) any unfulfilled requirements.
       (B) For the ANA, and separately for the ANP, an assessment 
     and any changes over time for the following:
       (i) Recruitment and retention numbers, rates of 
     absenteeism, rates and overall number of any desertions, ANSF 
     vetting procedures, and salary scale.
       (ii) Numbers ANSF being trained and the type of training 
     and mentoring.
       (iii) Operational readiness status of ANSF units, including 
     any changes to the type, number, size, and organizational 
     structure of ANA and ANP units.
       (iv) A description of any gaps in ANSF capacity and 
     capability.
       (v) Effectiveness of ANA and ANP senior officers and the 
     ANA and ANP chain of command.
       (vi) An assessment of the extent to which insurgents have 
     infiltrated the ANA and ANP.
       (vii) An assessment of the ANSF's ability to hold terrain 
     in Afghanistan and any posture changes in the ANSF such that 
     they no longer are providing coverage of certain areas in 
     Afghanistan that the ANSF was providing coverage of prior to 
     the reporting period.
       (C) An assessment of the relative strength of the 
     insurgency in Afghanistan and the extent to which it is 
     utilizing weapons or weapons-related materials from countries 
     other than Afghanistan.
       (D) A description of all terrorist and insurgent groups 
     operating in Afghanistan, including the number, size, 
     equipment strength, military effectiveness, and sources of 
     support.
       (E) An assessment of security and stability, including 
     terrorist and insurgent activity, in Afghanistan-Pakistan 
     border areas and in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal 
     Areas from groups, including, al-Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, 
     and the Quetta Shura Taliban, and any attacks on NATO supply 
     lines.
       (F) A description of the counterterrorism mission and an 
     assessment of the counterterrorism campaign within Operation 
     Resolute Support, including--
       (i) the ability of NATO and the ANSF to detain individuals 
     for intelligence purposes and to prevent high-value detainees 
     from returning to the battlefield; and
       (ii) an assessment of whether the Government of Afghanistan 
     is partnering effectively and conducting operations based on 
     NATO intelligence information.
       (G) An assessment of United States military requirements 
     for the NATO train, advise, and assist mission, 
     counterterrorism, and force protection requirements under 
     Operation Resolute Support, including planned personnel 
     rotations and the associated time period of deployment for 
     the 1-year period beginning on the date of the submission of 
     the report required under subsection (a).
       (d) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
     be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex, if necessary.
       (e) Congressional Briefings.--The Secretary of Defense 
     shall supplement the report required under subsection (a) 
     with regular briefings to the appropriate congressional 
     committees on the subject matter of the report.
       (f) Three-month Extension of Report on Progress Toward 
     Security and Stability in Afghanistan.--Section 1230(a) of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 
     (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended 
     by section 1218(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1632), is 
     further amended by striking ``the end of fiscal year 2014'' 
     and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
       (g) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1215. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT 
                   TO 150 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY 
                   AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH TAXES ARE NOT 
                   REIMBURSED BY AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) Requirement to Withhold Assistance to Afghanistan.--An 
     amount equivalent to 150 percent of the total taxes assessed 
     during fiscal year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on 
     all Department of Defense assistance in violation of the 
     status of forces agreement between the United States and 
     Afghanistan (entered in

[[Page 8645]]

     force May 28, 2003) shall be withheld by the Secretary of 
     Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for such 
     assistance for fiscal year 2015 to the extent that the 
     Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the 
     appropriate congressional committees that such taxes have not 
     been reimbursed by the Government of Afghanistan to the 
     Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or 
     subcontractor concerned.
       (b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines 
     that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States 
     goals in Afghanistan.
       (c) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
     committees a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal 
     year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on any Department 
     of Defense assistance.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
     ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
       (2) Department of defense assistance.--The term 
     ``Department of Defense assistance'' means funds provided in 
     a fiscal year to Afghanistan by the Department of Defense, 
     either directly or through grantees, contractors, or 
     subcontractors.
       (e) Termination.--This section shall terminate at the close 
     of the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a notification that the 
     United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral 
     security agreement and such agreement has entered into force.

     SEC. 1216. UNITED STATES PLAN FOR SUSTAINING THE AFGHANISTAN 
                   NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES THROUGH THE END OF 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2018.

       (a) Plan Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a 
     detailed plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Army 
     (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the 
     Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) through the end 
     of fiscal year 2018, with the objective of ensuring that a 
     strong and fully-capable ANSF will be able to independently 
     and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and 
     stability in Afghanistan.
       (b) Matters to Be Included.--The plan contained in the 
     report required under subsection (a) shall include a 
     description of the following matters:
       (1) A comprehensive and effective strategy and budget, with 
     defined objectives.
       (2) A description of the commitment for contributions from 
     the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and non-NATO 
     nations, including the plan to achieve such commitments for 
     the ANSF.
       (3) A mechanism for tracking funding, equipment, training, 
     and services provided for the ANSF by the United States, 
     countries participating in NATO, and other coalition forces 
     that are not part of Operation Resolute Support.
       (4) Any actions to assist the Government of Afghanistan or 
     on its behalf to achieve the following goals and the results 
     of such actions:
       (A) Improve and sustain effective Afghan security 
     institutions with fully capable senior leadership and staff, 
     including logistics, intelligence, medical, and recruiting 
     units.
       (B) Any additional train and equip efforts, including for 
     the Afghan Air Force, as necessary, and Afghan Special 
     Mission Wing, such that these entities are fully-capable of 
     conducting operations independently and in sufficient 
     numbers.
       (C) Establish strong ANSF-readiness assessment tools and 
     metrics.
       (D) Improve and sustain strong, professional ANSF officers 
     at the junior-, mid-, and senior-levels
       (E) Further strong ANSF communication and control between 
     central command and regions, provinces, and districts.
       (F) Develop and improve mechanisms for incorporating 
     lessons learned and best practices into ANSF operations.
       (G) Improve ANSF oversight mechanisms, including a strong 
     record-keeping system to track ANSF equipment and personnel.
       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1217. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON UNITED STATES MILITARY 
                   COMMITMENT TO OPERATION RESOLUTE SUPPORT IN 
                   AFGHANISTAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States continues to have vital national 
     security interests in ensuring that Afghanistan remains a 
     stable, sovereign country and that groups like Al Qaeda, the 
     Haqqani Network, and the Quetta Shura Taliban are not able to 
     use Afghanistan as a safe haven from which to launch attacks;
       (2) the United States should have a residual presence in 
     Afghanistan to train, advise, and assist the ANSF, conduct 
     counterterrorism operations, and support force protection 
     requirements in order to maintain the gains achieved in 
     Afghanistan;
       (3) it is in the interests of both the United States and 
     Afghanistan to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement as soon 
     as practicable after the new President of Afghanistan is 
     sworn in;
       (4) the United States should provide financial, advisory, 
     and other necessary support to the ANSF, at the authorized 
     end-strength of 352,000 personnel, through 2018;
       (5) the train, advise, and assist mission, following the 
     end of the NATO mission on December 31, 2014, should be able 
     to assist the ANSF in all parts of Afghanistan;
       (6) uncertainty with the signing of the Bilateral Security 
     Agreement with Afghanistan is threatening the gains achieved 
     by the United States and coalition forces and the United 
     States' enduring vital national security interests in 
     Afghanistan and the region;
       (7) the President should announce the United States 
     residual presence for Operation Resolute Support to reassure 
     the people of Afghanistan and to provide a tangible statement 
     of support for the future of Afghanistan;
       (8) the United States should aggressively work with NATO 
     and the Government of Afghanistan to achieve a status of 
     forces agreement for NATO forces in support of the post-2014 
     mission; and
       (9) NATO member countries pledged their support and long-
     term commitment to Afghanistan at the Lisbon, Chicago, and 
     Tokyo conferences and should honor their commitments to 
     Afghanistan and the ANSF.

     SEC. 1218. EXTENSION OF AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT PROGRAM.

       Section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 
     2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(E) Fiscal year 2015.--
       ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (D), 
     for fiscal year 2015, the total number of principal aliens 
     who may be provided special immigrant status under this 
     section may not exceed 1,075. For purposes of status provided 
     under this subparagraph--

       ``(I) the period during which an alien must have been 
     employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) must 
     terminate on or before December 31, 2015;
       ``(II) the principal alien seeking special immigrant status 
     under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission 
     in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than September 
     30, 2015; and
       ``(III) the authority to provide such status shall 
     terminate on September 30, 2016.

       ``(ii) Construction.--Clause (i) shall not be construed to 
     affect numerical limitations, or the terms for provision of 
     status, under subparagraph (D).''.

         Subtitle C--Matters Relating to the Russian Federation

     SEC. 1221. LIMITATION ON MILITARY CONTACT AND COOPERATION 
                   BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE RUSSIAN 
                   FEDERATION.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral 
     military-to-military contact or cooperation between the 
     Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation 
     until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate 
     congressional committees that--
       (1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no 
     longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
       (2) the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of 
     all Ukrainian territory;
       (3) the Russian Federation is no longer taking actions that 
     are inconsistent with the INF Treaty;
       (4) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE 
     Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of 
     its treaty obligations; and
       (5) the Russian Federation has not sold or otherwise 
     transferred the Club-K land attack cruise missile system to 
     any foreign country or foreign person during fiscal year 
     2014.
       (b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
     limitation in subsection (a) with respect to a certification 
     requirement specified in paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) if--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the 
     Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional 
     committees--
       (A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national 
     security interest of the United States and a description of 
     the national security interest covered by the waiver; and
       (B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot 
     make the certification under subsection (a); and
       (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the 
     report under subparagraph (B).
       (c) Additional Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     the limitation required by subsection (a)(5) with respect to 
     the sale or other transfer of the Club-K land attack cruise 
     missile system if--
       (1) the United States has imposed sanctions against the 
     manufacturer of such system by reason of such sale or other 
     transfer; or
       (2) the Secretary has developed and submitted to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a plan to prevent the 
     sale or other transfer of such system in the future.
       (d) Exception for Certain Military Bases.--The 
     certification requirement specified

[[Page 8646]]

     in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to 
     military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine's Crimean 
     peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on 
     the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing 
     on the Territory of Ukraine.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
     ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
       (2) Bilateral military-to-military contact or 
     cooperation.--The term ``bilateral military-to-military 
     contact or cooperation''--
       (A) means--
       (i) reciprocal visits and meetings by high-ranking 
     delegations;
       (ii) information sharing, policy consultations, security 
     dialogues or other forms of consultative discussions;
       (iii) exchanges of military instructors, training 
     personnel, and students;
       (iv) exchanges of information;
       (v) defense planning; and
       (vi) military training or exercises; but
       (B) does not include any contact or cooperation that is in 
     support of United States stability operations.
       (3) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris 
     November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
       (4) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet 
     Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-
     Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the 
     Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at 
     Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 
     1988.
       (f) Effective Date.--This section takes effect on the date 
     of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to 
     funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of 
     such date of enactment.

     SEC. 1222. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS WITH RESPECT TO 
                   CERTIFICATION OF CERTAIN FLIGHTS BY THE RUSSIAN 
                   FEDERATION UNDER THE TREATY ON OPEN SKIES.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or any other Act may be used to 
     authorize or permit a certification by the United States of a 
     proposal by the Russian Federation to change any sensor 
     package of an aircraft for a flight by the Russian Federation 
     under the Open Skies Treaty, unless--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint 
     Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of National Intelligence 
     jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees 
     that such proposal will not enhance the capability or 
     potential of the Russian Federation to gather intelligence 
     that poses an unacceptable risk to the national security of 
     the United States or is not designed to be collected under 
     such Treaty; and
       (2) the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate 
     congressional committees that--
       (A) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no 
     longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
       (B) the Russian Federation is no longer violating the INF 
     Treaty; and
       (C) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE 
     Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of 
     its treaty obligations.
       (b) Waiver.--The President may waive the requirement of the 
     Secretary of State to make a certification described in 
     subsection (a)(2) with respect to a proposal by the Russian 
     Federation if the President determines that it is in the 
     national security interests of the United States to do so and 
     submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report 
     that contains the reasons for such determination.
       (c) Notice and Wait Requirement.--The President may not 
     authorize or permit a certification by the United States for 
     which the certifications required by paragraphs (1) and (2) 
     of subsection (a) are made until the expiration of a 90-day 
     period beginning on the date on which the certification 
     required by such paragraph (1) or the certification required 
     by such paragraph (2) is submitted to the appropriate 
     congressional committees, whichever occurs later.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
     ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the congressional defense committees;
       (B) the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee 
     on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (C) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
       (2) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris 
     November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
       (3) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet 
     Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-
     Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the 
     Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at 
     Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 
     1988.
       (4) Open skies treaty.--The term ``Open Skies Treaty'' 
     means the Treaty on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 
     1992, and entered into force January 1, 2002.

     SEC. 1223. LIMITATIONS ON PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE 
                   INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

       (a) In General.--Section 1246(c) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 923) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2016'' and inserting 
     ``2017'';
       (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``2014'' the 
     following: ``or 2015''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign 
     Affairs of the House of Representatives'' after 
     ``congressional defense committees''.
       (b) Limitations on Providing Other Information.--No funds 
     authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for 
     each of fiscal years 2015 through 2017 for the Department of 
     Defense may be used to provide the Government of the Russian 
     Federation or any Russian person with information relating to 
     the velocity at burnout of United States missile defense 
     interceptors or missile defense targets or related 
     information.

     SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER 
                   MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN 
                   FEDERATION.

       (a) In General.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 
     or any subsequent fiscal year for the Department of Defense 
     may be obligated or expended to transfer missile defense 
     information to the Russian Federation unless, with respect to 
     such fiscal year, the President submits to the congressional 
     defense committees not later than October 31 of such fiscal 
     year a report on discussions between the Russian Federation 
     and the United States on missile defense matters during the 
     immediately preceding fiscal year, including any discussions 
     for cooperation between the two countries on missile defense 
     matters.
       (b) Fiscal Year 2015 Report.--The report submitted pursuant 
     to subsection (a) with respect to fiscal year 2015 shall, in 
     addition to including the information described in subsection 
     (a) with respect to fiscal year 2014, include the information 
     described in subsection (a) with respect to fiscal years 2007 
     through 2013.

     SEC. 1225. REPORT ON NON-COMPLIANCE BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
                   OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INF TREATY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) the Russian Federation is in material breach of its 
     obligations under the Treaty Between the United States of 
     America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the 
     Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range 
     Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range 
     Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 
     1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988; and
       (2) such behavior poses a threat to the United States, its 
     deployed forces, and its allies.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the President should hold the Russian Federation 
     accountable for being in material breach of its obligations 
     under the INF Treaty;
       (2) the President should demand the Russian Federation 
     completely and verifiably eliminate the military systems that 
     constitute the material breach of its obligations under the 
     INF Treaty;
       (3) the President should seriously consider not engaging in 
     further reductions of United States nuclear forces generally 
     and should seriously consider not engaging in nuclear arms 
     reduction negotiations with the Russian Federation 
     specifically until such complete and verifiable elimination 
     of the military systems has occurred; and
       (4) the President, in consultation with United States 
     allies, should consider whether it is in the national 
     security interests of the United States to unilaterally 
     remain a party to the INF Treaty if the Russian Federation is 
     still in material breach of the INF Treaty beginning one year 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the 
     President shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
     committees an unclassified report that includes the 
     following:
       (1) The status of the President's efforts, in cooperation 
     with United States allies, to hold the Russian Federation 
     accountable for being in material breach of its obligations 
     under the INF Treaty and obtain the complete and verifiable 
     elimination of its military systems that constitute the 
     material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty.
       (2) The President's assessment as to whether it remains in 
     the national security interests of the United States to 
     remain a party to the INF Treaty, and other related treaties 
     and agreements, while the Russian Federation is in material 
     breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty.
       (d) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section, 
     the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees;
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select 
     Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
       (3) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent 
     Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1226. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING RUSSIAN AGGRESSION 
                   TOWARD UKRAINE.

       It is the sense of the Congress that--

[[Page 8647]]

       (1) the continuing and long-standing pattern and practice 
     by the Government of the Russian Federation of physical, 
     diplomatic, and economic aggression toward neighboring 
     countries is clearly intended to exert undue influence on the 
     free will of sovereign nations and peoples to determine their 
     own future;
       (2) the Russian military build-up and aggressive posture on 
     the eastern border of Ukraine represent a deliberate intent 
     to intimidate Ukraine and to force its citizens to submit to 
     Russian control;
       (3) the Russian Federation should immediately cease all 
     improper and illegal activities in Ukraine;
       (4) the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, 
     which was executed jointly with the Russian Federation, 
     Ukraine, and the United Kingdom, represents a commitment to 
     respect the independence, sovereignty, and territorial 
     integrity and borders of Ukraine, and Russian actions clearly 
     violate the commitment made by the Russian Federation in that 
     memorandum;
       (5) the security cooperation with the Ukrainian military by 
     the United States military is an important opportunity to 
     support the continued professionalization of the Ukrainian 
     military;
       (6) an enhanced military presence and readiness posture of 
     the United States military in Europe is key to deterring 
     further Russian aggression and assuring allies and partners; 
     and
       (7) the treaty commitments under Article 5 of the North 
     Atlantic Treaty signed at Washington, April 4, 1949, and 
     entered into force August 24, 1949, are important and a 
     cornerstone to international security.

     SEC. 1227. ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY 
                   DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

       (a) Report.--Not later than June 1 of each year, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate 
     congressional committees a report, in both classified and 
     unclassified form, on the current and future military power 
     of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as 
     ``Russia''). The report shall address the current and 
     probable future course of military-technological development 
     of the Russian military, the tenets and probable development 
     of Russian security strategy and military strategy, and 
     military organizations and operational concepts, for the 20-
     year period following submission of such report.
       (b) Matters to Be Included.--A report required under 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) An assessment of the security situation in regions 
     neighboring Russia.
       (2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy 
     and military strategy.
       (3) Trends in Russian security and military behavior that 
     would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with, 
     the goals described in paragraph (2).
       (4) An assessment of Russia's global and regional security 
     objectives, including objectives that would affect NATO, the 
     Middle East, and the People's Republic of China.
       (5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and 
     capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land, 
     sea, and air forces.
       (6) Developments in Russian military doctrine and training.
       (7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia 
     and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, 
     technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or 
     other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
       (8) Developments in Russia's asymmetric capabilities, 
     including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy 
     cyber warfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on 
     the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from 
     Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and 
     associated activities originating or suspected of originating 
     from Russia.
       (9) The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and 
     counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional 
     activities, the involvement of military and civilian 
     organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic 
     institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to 
     develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies 
     that would enhance Russian military capabilities.
       (10) Developments in Russia's nuclear program, including 
     the size and state of Russia's stockpile, its nuclear 
     strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military 
     production capacities, and projections of its future 
     arsenals.
       (11) A description of Russia's anti-access and area denial 
     capabilities.
       (12) A description of Russia's command, control, 
     communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and 
     reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for 
     Russia's precision guided weapons.
       (13) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the 
     Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-
     Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
       (14) The current state of United States military-to-
     military contacts with the Russian Federation armed forces, 
     which shall include the following:
       (A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such 
     military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy.
       (B) A summary of all such military-to-military contacts 
     during the one-year period preceding the report, including a 
     summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the 
     Russian participants in those contacts.
       (C) A description of such military-to-military contacts 
     scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and 
     the plan for future contacts.
       (D) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Russians 
     expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts.
       (E) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the 
     Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-
     military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts.
       (F) The Secretary's assessment of how such military-to-
     military contacts fit into the larger security relationship 
     between the United States and the Russian Federation.
       (15) A description of Russian military-to-military 
     relationships with other countries, including the size and 
     activity of military attache offices around the world and 
     military education programs conducted in Russia for other 
     countries or in other countries for the Russians.
       (16) Other military and security developments involving 
     Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to 
     United States national security.
       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
       (d) Repeal of Superseded Authority.--Section 10 of the 
     Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and 
     Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-95) 
     is repealed.
       (e) Sunset.--This section shall terminate on June 1, 2021.

        Subtitle D--Matters Relating to the Asia-Pacific Region

     SEC. 1231. STRATEGY TO PRIORITIZE UNITED STATES INTERESTS IN 
                   THE UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND AREA OF 
                   RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.

       (a) Strategy.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
     with the Secretary of State and the heads of other Federal 
     departments and agencies specified in paragraph (4), shall 
     develop a strategy to prioritize United States interests in 
     the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility.
       (2) Matters to be included.--The strategy required by 
     paragraph (1) shall address the following:
       (A) Strengthening bilateral security alliances.
       (B) Improving relationships with countries that are 
     emerging powers.
       (C) Engaging with regional multilateral institutions.
       (D) Expanding trade and investment.
       (E) Bolstering a capable military presence.
       (F) Promoting democracy and human rights.
       (G) Coordinating efforts to counter transnational threats.
       (H) Maintaining a rules-based structure.
       (I) Improving the current and future security environment.
       (J) Prioritizing United States military and diplomatic 
     missions within respective Federal department or agency 
     planning and budgeting guidance.
       (K) Coordinating a response framework to prepare for, 
     respond to, and recover from emergencies.
       (L) Prioritizing security cooperation initiatives, 
     including military-to-military and military-to-civilian 
     engagements.
       (3) Asia rebalancing strategy.--The strategy required by 
     paragraph (1) shall be informed by the results of the 
     integrated, multi-year planning and budget strategy for a 
     rebalancing of United States policy in Asia submitted to 
     Congress pursuant to section 7043(a) of the Department of 
     State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
     Appropriations Act, 2014 (division K of the Consolidated 
     Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76)).
       (4) Federal departments and agencies specified.--The 
     Federal departments and agencies specified in this paragraph 
     are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of 
     Transportation, the Department of Commerce, the Department of 
     the Interior, the Office of the United States Trade 
     Representative, and any other relevant department or agency 
     as specified by the Secretary of Defense.
       (b) Implementation Plan.--
       (1) In general.--The President, acting through the National 
     Security Council and in coordination with the Director of the 
     Office of Management and Budget, shall develop an 
     implementation plan for the Department of Defense, the 
     Department of State, and each Federal department and agency 
     specified in subsection (a)(4) to support the strategy 
     required by subsection (a). The implementation plan shall 
     provide specific goals and areas of focus for each department 
     and agency to prioritize funding in its annual budget 
     submissions.
       (2) Relation to agency priority goals and annual budget.--
       (A) Agency priority goals.--In identifying agency priority 
     goals under section 1120(b) of title 31, United States Code, 
     for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and 
     each Federal department and agency specified in subsection 
     (a)(4), the President, acting through the Director of the 
     Office of Management and Budget, shall take into 
     consideration the strategy required by subsection (a) and the 
     implementation plan of the department or agency required by 
     paragraph (1).

[[Page 8648]]

       (B) Annual budget.--The President, acting through the 
     Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure 
     that the annual budget submitted to Congress under section 
     1105 of title 31, United States Code, includes a separate 
     section that clearly highlights programs and projects that 
     are being funded in the annual budget that relate to the 
     strategy required by subsection (a) and the implementation 
     plan of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, 
     and each Federal department and agency specified in 
     subsection (a)(4).
       (c) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the 
     National Security Council, shall submit to Congress a report 
     than contains the strategy required by subsection (a) and 
     each implementation plan required by subsection (b).
       (2) Form.--The report shall be submitted in unclassified 
     form but may contain a classified annex if necessary.

     SEC. 1232. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND 
                   SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE'S 
                   REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

       (a) Matters To Be Included.--Subsection (b) of section 1202 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2000 (Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) 
     is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (20) as 
     paragraphs (11) through (21), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
       ``(10) The developments in maritime law enforcement 
     capabilities and organization of the People's Republic of 
     China, focusing on activities in contested maritime areas in 
     the South China Sea and East China Sea. Such analyses shall 
     include an assessment of the nature of China's maritime law 
     enforcement activities directed against United States allies 
     and partners. Such maritime activities shall include 
     activities originating or suspect of originating from China 
     and shall include government and nongovernment activities 
     that are believed to be sanctioned or supported by the 
     Chinese government.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
     apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under 
     subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as so amended, on or 
     after that date.

     SEC. 1233. REPORT ON GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GUIDING MILITARY 
                   ENGAGEMENT WITH BURMA.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than December 1, 2014, the 
     Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of 
     State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
     committees a report on the goals and objectives guiding 
     military-to-military engagement between the United States and 
     the Union of Burma.
       (b) Matters to Be Included.--The report required under 
     subsection (a) shall include--
       (1) a description of the specific goals and objectives of 
     the United States that military-to-military engagement 
     between the United States and Burma would facilitate;
       (2) a description of how the United States measures 
     progress toward such goals and objectives, and the 
     implications of failing to achieve such goals and objectives;
       (3) a description of the specific military-to-military 
     engagement activities between the United States and Burma 
     conducted during the period beginning on March 1, 2011, and 
     ending on the close of the day before the date of the 
     submission of the report, and of any planned military-to-
     military engagement activities between the United States and 
     Burma that will be conducted during the period beginning on 
     the date of the submission of the report and ending on the 
     close of February 29, 2020, including descriptions of 
     associated goals and objectives, estimated costs, timeframes, 
     and United States military organizations or personnel 
     involved;
       (4) a description and assessment of the political, 
     military, economic, and civil society reforms being 
     undertaken by the Government of Burma, including--
       (A) protecting the individual freedoms and human rights of 
     the Burmese people, including for all ethnic and religious 
     minorities and internally displaced populations;
       (B) establishing civilian control of the armed forces;
       (C) implementing constitutional and electoral reforms;
       (D) allowing access to all areas in Burma; and
       (E) increasing governmental transparency and 
     accountability; and
       (5) a description and assessment of relationships of the 
     Government of Burma with unlawful or sanctioned entities.
       (c) Update.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
     with the Secretary of State, shall submit on an annual basis 
     to the appropriate congressional committees an update of the 
     matters described in subsection (b)(4) and included in the 
     report required under subsection (a).
       (2) Sunset.--The requirement to submit updates under 
     paragraph (1) shall terminate at the end of the 5-year period 
     beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (d) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
     be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex, if necessary.
       (e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1234. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MUNITIONS STRATEGY 
                   FOR UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report on the munitions strategy for the 
     United States Pacific Command, including an identification of 
     munitions requirements, an assessment of munitions gaps and 
     shortfalls, and necessary munitions investments. Such 
     strategy shall cover the 10-year period beginning with 2015.
       (b) Elements.--The report on munitions strategy required by 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) An identification of current and projected munitions 
     requirements, by class or type.
       (2) An assessment of munitions gaps and shortfalls, 
     including a census of current munitions capabilities and 
     programs, not including ammunition.
       (3) A description of current and planned munitions 
     programs, including with respect to procurement, research, 
     development, test and evaluation, and deployment activities.
       (4) Schedules, estimated costs, and budget plans for 
     current and planned munitions programs.
       (5) Identification of opportunities and limitations within 
     the associated industrial base.
       (6) Identification and evaluation of technology needs and 
     applicable emerging technologies, including with respect to 
     directed energy, rail gun, and cyber technologies.
       (7) An assessment of how current and planned munitions 
     programs, and promising technologies, may affect existing 
     operational concepts and capabilities of the military 
     departments or lead to new operational concepts and 
     capabilities.
       (8) An assessment of programs and capabilities by other 
     countries to counter the munitions programs and capabilities 
     of the Armed Forces of the United States, not including with 
     respect to ammunition, and how such assessment affects the 
     munitions strategy of each military department.
       (9) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
       (c) Form.--The report under subsection (a) may be submitted 
     in classified or unclassified form.

     SEC. 1235. MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) Admiral Samuel Locklear, Commander of the United States 
     Pacific Command, testified before the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the House of Representatives on March 5, 2014, 
     that in the spring of 2013, North Korea ``conducted another 
     underground nuclear test, threatened the use of a nuclear 
     weapon against the United States, and concurrently conducted 
     a mobile missile deployment of an Intermediate Range 
     Ballistic Missile, reportedly capable of ranging our western 
     most U.S. territory in the Pacific.'';
       (2) General Curtis Scaparrotti, Commander of the United 
     States Forces Korea, testified before such committee on April 
     2, 2014, that ``CFC [Combined Forces Command] is placing 
     special emphasis on missile defense, not only in terms of 
     systems and capabilities, but also with regard to 
     implementing an Alliance counter-missile strategy required 
     for our combined defense.''; and
       (3) increased emphasis and cooperation on missile defense 
     among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, 
     enhances the security of allies of the United States in 
     Northeast Asia, increases the defense of forward-based forces 
     of the United States, and enhances the protection of the 
     United States.
       (b) Assessment Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     conduct an assessment to identify opportunities for 
     increasing missile defense cooperation among the United 
     States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, and to evaluate 
     options for short-range missile, rocket, and artillery 
     defense capabilities.
       (c) Elements.--The assessment under subsection (b) shall 
     include the following:
       (1) Candidate areas for increasing missile defense 
     cooperation, including greater information sharing, systems 
     integration, and joint operations.
       (2) Potential challenges and limitations to enabling such 
     cooperation and plans for mitigating such challenges and 
     limitations.
       (3) An assessment of the utility of short-range missile 
     defense and counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar system 
     capabilities, including with respect to--
       (A) the requirements for such capabilities to meet 
     operational and contingency plan requirements in Northeast 
     Asia;
       (B) cost, schedule, and availability;
       (C) technology maturity and risk; and
       (D) consideration of alternatives.
       (d) Briefing Required.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall provide to the congressional defense committees a 
     briefing on the assessment under subsection (b).

     SEC. 1236. MARITIME CAPABILITIES OF TAIWAN AND ITS 
                   CONTRIBUTION TO REGIONAL PEACE AND STABILITY.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2016, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Chairman 
     of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional 
     defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
     Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives a report that contains the following:

[[Page 8649]]

       (1) A description and assessment of the posture and 
     readiness of elements of the Chinese People's Liberation Army 
     expected or available to threaten the maritime or territorial 
     security of Taiwan, including an assessment of--
       (A) the undersea and surface warfare capabilities of the 
     People's Liberation Army Navy in the littoral areas in and 
     around the Taiwan Strait;
       (B) the amphibious and heavy sealift capabilities of the 
     People's Liberation Army Navy;
       (C) the capabilities of the People's Liberation Army Air 
     Force to establish air dominance over Taiwan; and
       (D) the capabilities of the People's Liberation Army Second 
     Artillery Corps to suppress or destroy the forces of Taiwan 
     necessary to defend the security of Taiwan.
       (2) A description and assessment of the posture and 
     readiness of elements of the armed forces of Taiwan expected 
     or available to maintain the maritime or territorial security 
     of Taiwan, including an assessment of--
       (A) the undersea and surface warfare capabilities of the 
     navy of Taiwan;
       (B) the land-based anti-ship cruise missile capabilities of 
     Taiwan; and
       (C) other anti-access or area-denial capabilities, such as 
     mines, that contribute to the deterrence of Taiwan against 
     actions taken to determine the future of Taiwan by other than 
     peaceful means.
       (b) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) may be 
     submitted in classified or unclassified form.
       (c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States, in accordance with the Taiwan 
     Relations Act (Public Law 96-8), should continue to make 
     available to Taiwan such defense articles and services as may 
     be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-
     defense capability;
       (2) the growth and modernization of the People's Liberation 
     Army, including its focus on ``preparing for potential 
     conflict in the Taiwan Strait [which] appears to remain the 
     principal focus and primary driver of China's military 
     investment'', as noted in the 2013 Office of the Secretary of 
     Defense Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security 
     Developments Involving the People's Republic of China, 
     requires greater attention to the needed defense capabilities 
     of Taiwan; and
       (3) the United States should consider opportunities to help 
     enhance the maritime capabilities and nautical skills of the 
     Taiwanese navy that can contribute to Taiwan's self-defense 
     and to regional peace and stability, including extending an 
     invitation to Taiwan to participate in the 2014 Rim of the 
     Pacific international maritime exercise in non-combat areas 
     such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief 
     operations.

     SEC. 1237. INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT ON COUNTERING ANTI-ACCESS 
                   AND AREA-DENIAL STRATEGIES AND CAPABILITIES IN 
                   THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION.

       (a) Assessment Required.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall enter into 
     an agreement with an independent entity to conduct an 
     assessment of anti-access and area-denial strategies and 
     capabilities that pose a threat to security in the Asia-
     Pacific region and strategies to mitigate such threats.
       (2) Matters to be included.--The assessment required under 
     paragraph (1) shall include--
       (A) identification of anti-access and area-denial 
     strategies and capabilities;
       (B) assessment of gaps and shortfalls in the ability of the 
     United States to address anti-access and area-denial 
     strategies and capabilities identified under subparagraph (A) 
     and plans of the Department of Defense to address such gaps 
     and shortfalls;
       (C) assessment of Department of Defense strategies to 
     counter or mitigate anti-access and area-denial strategies 
     and capabilities identified under subparagraph (A); and
       (D) any other matters the independent entity determines to 
     be appropriate.
       (b) Report Required.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report that includes the assessment and 
     strategies required under subsection (a) and any other 
     matters the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
       (2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
     annex if necessary.
       (c) Department of Defense Support.--The Secretary of 
     Defense shall provide the independent entity described in 
     subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, 
     data, and analysis so that the entity may conduct a thorough 
     and independent assessment as required under subsection (a).

     SEC. 1238. SENSE OF CONGRESS REAFFIRMING SECURITY COMMITMENT 
                   TO JAPAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States highly values its alliance with the 
     Government of Japan as a cornerstone of peace and security in 
     the region, based on shared values of democracy, the rule of 
     law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights in 
     order to promote peace, security, stability, and economic 
     prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region;
       (2) the United States welcomes Japan's determination to 
     contribute more proactively to regional and global peace and 
     security;
       (3) the United States supports recent increases in Japanese 
     defense funding, adoption of a National Security Strategy, 
     formation of security institutions such as the Japanese 
     National Security Council, and other moves that will enable 
     Japan to bear even greater alliance responsibilities;
       (4) the United States and Japan should continue to improve 
     joint interoperability and collaborate on developing future 
     capabilities with which to maintain regional stability in an 
     increasingly uncertain security environment;
       (5) the United States and Japan should continue efforts to 
     strengthen regional multilateral institutions that promote 
     economic and security cooperation based on internationally 
     accepted rules and norms;
       (6) the United States acknowledges that the Senkaku Islands 
     are under the administration of Japan and opposes any 
     unilateral actions that would seek to undermine such 
     administration and remains committed under the Treaty of 
     Mutual Cooperation and Security to respond to any armed 
     attack in the territories under the administration of Japan; 
     and
       (7) the United States reaffirms its commitment to the 
     Government of Japan under Article V of the Treaty of Mutual 
     Cooperation and Security that ``[e]ach Party recognizes that 
     an armed attack against either Party in the territories under 
     the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own 
     peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the 
     common danger in accordance with its constitutional 
     provisions and processes''.

     SEC. 1239. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON OPPORTUNITIES TO STRENGTHEN 
                   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE 
                   REPUBLIC OF KOREA.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the alliance between the United States and Republic of 
     Korea has served as an anchor for stability, security, and 
     prosperity on the Korean Peninsula, in the Asia-Pacific 
     region, and around the world;
       (2) the United States and Republic of Korea continue to 
     strengthen and adapt the alliance to serve as a linchpin of 
     peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, recognizing 
     the shared values of democracy, human rights, and the rule of 
     law as the foundations of the alliance;
       (3) the United States and Republic of Korea share deep 
     concerns that North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missiles 
     programs and its repeated provocations pose grave threats to 
     peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and Northeast 
     Asia and recognize that both nations are determined to 
     achieve the peaceful denuclearization of North Korea, and 
     remain fully committed to continuing close cooperation on the 
     full range of issues related to North Korea;
       (4) the United States supports the vision of a Korean 
     Peninsula free of nuclear weapons, free from the fear of war, 
     and peacefully reunited on the basis of democratic and free 
     market principles, as articulated in President Park's Dresden 
     address;
       (5) the United States and Republic of Korea are 
     strengthening the combined defense posture on the Korean 
     Peninsula;
       (6) the United States and Republic of Korea have decided 
     that due to the evolving security environment in the region, 
     including the enduring North Korean nuclear and missile 
     threat, the current timeline to the transition of wartime 
     operational control (OPCON) to a Republic of Korea-led 
     defense in 2015 can be reconsidered; and
       (7) the United States welcomes the Republic of Korea's 
     ratification of a new five-year Special Measures Agreement, 
     which establishes the framework for Republic of Korea 
     contributions to offset the costs associated with the 
     stationing of United States Forces Korea on the Korean 
     Peninsula.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

     SEC. 1241. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT OF SPECIAL 
                   OPERATIONS TO COMBAT TERRORISM.

       Section 1208(h) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375; 
     118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1203(c) 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended 
     by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2017''.

     SEC. 1242. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-
                   CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES.

       (a) Extension.--Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan 
     Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently 
     amended by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 920), 
     is further amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting 
     ``2016''.
       (b) Cross-reference Amendment.--Subsection (f) of such 
     section is amended by striking ``413b(e)'' and inserting 
     ``3093(e)''.

     SEC. 1243. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT 
                   OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF 
                   SECURITY COOPERATION IN IRAQ.

       Section 1215(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1631; 
     10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1214 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 906; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), 
     is further amended--
       (1) by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and inserting ``fiscal 
     year 2015'';
       (2) by striking ``non-operational''; and
       (3) by striking ``in an institutional environment'' and 
     inserting ``at a base or facility of the Government of 
     Iraq''.

[[Page 8650]]



     SEC. 1244. MODIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY PLANNING 
                   GUIDANCE TO DENY SAFE HAVENS TO AL-QAEDA AND 
                   ITS VIOLENT EXTREMIST AFFILIATES.

       (a) Modification.--Section 1032(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by redesignating subparagraph (C), (D), and (E) as 
     subparagraph (D), (E), and (F), respectively;
       (B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
       ``(C) For each specified geographic area, a description of 
     the following:
       ``(i) The feasibility of conducting multilateral programs 
     to train and equip the military forces of relevant countries 
     in the area.
       ``(ii) The authority and funding that would be required to 
     support such programs.
       ``(iii) How such programs would be implemented.
       ``(iv) How such programs would support the national 
     security priorities and interests of the United States and 
     complement other efforts of the United States Government in 
     the area and in other specified geographic areas.''; and
       (C) in subparagraph (F) (as redesignated), by striking 
     ``subparagraph (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (D)''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``paragraph (2)(C)'' 
     and inserting ``paragraph (2)(D)''.
       (b) Report.--Section 1032(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note), as amended by 
     subsection (a), is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
       ``(4) Report.--
       ``(A) In general.--Not later than October 1, 2014, the 
     President shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
     committees a report that contains the national security 
     planning guidance required under paragraph (1), including any 
     updates thereto.
       ``(B) Form.--The report may include a classified annex as 
     determined to be necessary by the President.
       ``(C) Definition.--In this paragraph, the term `appropriate 
     congressional committees' means--
       ``(i) the congressional defense committees; and
       ``(ii) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.''.

     SEC. 1245. ENHANCED AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE GOODS AND SERVICES 
                   OF DJIBOUTI IN SUPPORT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   ACTIVITIES IN UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND AREA 
                   OF RESPONSIBILITY.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States forces should continue to be forward 
     postured in Africa and in the Middle East;
       (2) Djibouti is in a strategic location to support United 
     States vital national security interests in the region;
       (3) the United States should take definitive steps to 
     maintain its basing access and agreements with the Government 
     of Djibouti to support United States vital national security 
     interests in the region;
       (4) the United States should devise and implement a 
     comprehensive governmental approach to engaging with the 
     Government of Djibouti to reinforce the strategic partnership 
     between the United States and Djibouti; and
       (5) the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the 
     United States Agency for International Development, in 
     conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, should take 
     concrete steps to advance and strengthen the relationship 
     between United States and the Government of Djibouti.
       (b) Authority.--In the case of a good or service to be 
     acquired in direct support of covered activities for which 
     the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in 
     subsection (c), the Secretary may conduct a procurement in 
     which--
       (1) competition is limited to goods of Djibouti or services 
     of Djibouti; or
       (2) a preference is provided for goods of Djibouti or 
     services of Djibouti.
       (c) Determination.--
       (1) In general.--A determination described in this 
     subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of 
     the following:
       (A) That the good or service concerned is to be used only 
     in support of covered activities.
       (B) That it is vital to the national security interests of 
     the United States to limit competition or provide a 
     preference as described in subsection (b) because such 
     limitation or preference is necessary--
       (i) to reduce--

       (I) United States transportation costs; or
       (II) delivery times in support of covered activities; or

       (ii) to promote regional security, stability, and economic 
     prosperity in Africa.
       (C) That the good or service is of equivalent quality of a 
     good or service that would have otherwise been acquired.
       (2) Additional requirement.--A determination under 
     paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a 
     limitation or preference under subsection (b) unless the 
     Secretary also determines that the limitation or preference 
     will not adversely affect--
       (A) United States military operations or stability 
     operations in the United States Africa Command area of 
     responsibility; or
       (B) the United States industrial base.
       (d) Reporting and Oversight.--In exercising the authority 
     under subsection (b) to procure goods or services in support 
     of covered activities, the Secretary of Defense--
       (1) in the case of the procurement of services, shall 
     ensure that the procurement is conducted in accordance with 
     the management structure implemented pursuant to section 
     2330(a) of title 10, United States Code;
       (2) shall ensure that such goods or services are identified 
     and reported under a single, joint Department of Defense-wide 
     system for the management and accountability of contractors 
     accompanying United States forces operating overseas or in 
     contingency operations (such as the synchronized 
     predeployment and operational tracker (SPOT) system); and
       (3) shall ensure that the United States Africa Command has 
     sufficiently trained staff and adequate resources to conduct 
     oversight of procurements carried out pursuant to subsection 
     (b), including oversight to detect and deter fraud, waste, 
     and abuse.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Covered activities.--The term ``covered activities'' 
     means Department of Defense activities in the United States 
     Africa Command area of responsibility.
       (2) Good of djibouti.--The term ``good of Djibouti'' means 
     a good wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of 
     Djibouti.
       (3) Service of djibouti.--The term ``service of Djibouti'' 
     means a service performed by a person that--
       (A)(i) is operating primarily in Djibouti; or
       (ii) is making a significant contribution to the economy of 
     Djibouti through payment of taxes or use of products, 
     materials, or labor of Djibouti, as determined by the 
     Secretary of State; and
       (B) is properly licensed or registered by authorities of 
     the Government of Djibouti, as determined by the Secretary of 
     State.
       (f) Termination.--The authority and requirements of this 
     section expire at the close of September 30, 2018.

     SEC. 1246. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR UNITED STATES SECURITY 
                   FORCE ASSISTANCE AND COOPERATION IN THE 
                   EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN REGIONS.

       (a) Strategic Framework.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
     with the Secretary of State, shall develop a strategic 
     framework for United States security force assistance and 
     cooperation in the European and Eurasian regions.
       (2) Elements.--The strategic framework required by 
     paragraph (1) shall include the following:
       (A) An evaluation of the extent to which the threat to 
     security and stability in the European and Eurasian regions 
     is a threat to the national security of the United States and 
     the security interests of the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization alliance.
       (B) An identification of the primary objectives, 
     priorities, and desired end-states of United States security 
     force assistance and cooperation programs in such regions and 
     of the resources required to achieve such objectives, 
     priorities, and end states.
       (C) A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of United 
     States security force assistance and cooperation programs in 
     such regions in making progress towards such objectives, 
     priorities, and end-states, including an identification of 
     key benchmarks for such progress.
       (D) Criteria for bilateral and multilateral partnerships in 
     such regions.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a report on the 
     strategic framework required by subsection (a).
       (2) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 
     submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.
       (3) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate 
     congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

     SEC. 1247. REQUIREMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO CONTINUE 
                   IMPLEMENTATION OF UNITED STATES STRATEGY TO 
                   PREVENT AND RESPOND TO GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 
                   GLOBALLY AND PARTICIPATION IN INTERAGENCY 
                   WORKING GROUP.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the most dangerous places to be a woman are some of the 
     most unstable and violent regions in the world and gender-
     based violence will impact one in three women worldwide and 
     this in turn has a direct impact on United States national 
     security, the stability of nations, the rule of law, 
     democracy, and peace-building processes;
       (2) combating violence against women and girls through the 
     implementation and integration of gender-based violence 
     prevention and response mechanisms throughout United States 
     overseas operations is a critical step toward promoting 
     regional and global stability and achieving sustainable peace 
     and security;
       (3) under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee 
     of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign 
     Operations, and

[[Page 8651]]

     Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055, One 
     Hundred Twelfth Congress), the Secretary of State and the 
     Administrator of the United States Agency for International 
     Development were directed in the matter relating to section 
     7061 to submit to Congress a multi-year strategy to prevent 
     and respond to violence against women and girls in countries 
     where it is common through achievable and sustainable goals, 
     benchmarks for measuring progress, and expected results, 
     including through regular engagement with men and boys as 
     community leaders and advocates in ending such violence;
       (4) Executive Order 13623 of August 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 
     49345) established the United States Strategy to Prevent and 
     Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally (in this section 
     referred to as the ``Strategy''), the first such strategy 
     submitted pursuant to the matter relating to section 7061 
     under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of 
     Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign 
     Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012;
       (5) Executive Order 13623 required the Department of 
     Defense to participate in an Interagency Working Group co-
     chaired by the Department of State and the United States 
     Agency for International Development to implement the 
     Strategy; and
       (6) since the authority for the Strategy was established 
     initially in the matter relating to section 7061 under the 
     Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference 
     accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
     Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012, it is important 
     for Congress to maintain its appropriate oversight over the 
     implementation of the Strategy.
       (b) Briefings Required.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     brief the appropriate congressional committees on efforts of 
     the Department of Defense relating to participation in the 
     Interagency Working Group to implement the Strategy.
       (2) Matters to be included.--As part of the briefings, the 
     Secretary shall describe specifically efforts of the 
     Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group to 
     implement international violence against women and girls 
     prevention and response strategies, funding allocations, 
     programming, and associated outcomes.
       (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this 
     subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
       (c) Requirement to Continue Implementation of Strategy and 
     Participation in Interagency Working Group.--The Secretary of 
     Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense--
       (1) during the current period of the Strategy, continues to 
     implement the Strategy as appropriate by reason of the role 
     of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working 
     Group; and
       (2) continues to participate in interagency collaborative 
     efforts to prevent and respond to violence against women and 
     girls.

     SEC. 1248. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS OF 
                   ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) There is a lack of situational awareness within the 
     Department of Defense concerning how state and non-state 
     adversaries and potential adversaries are interwoven into the 
     international financial and trading systems via legal and 
     licit activities and use such market activities to fund and 
     equip themselves and advance their interests.
       (2) There is a lack of capability within the Department of 
     Defense to formulate policy options within the interagency 
     process, or for consideration within the Department, 
     concerning whether state and non-state adversaries and 
     potential adversaries have key vulnerabilities associated 
     with their positioning within the global economic and 
     financial systems.
       (3) The Department of Defense would benefit from having 
     enhanced situational awareness regarding the commercial and 
     strategic interactions of state and non-state adversaries and 
     potential adversaries within the global economic and 
     financial systems and integrating relevant findings into 
     defense policy options, deterrence strategy, planning and 
     preparedness.
       (4) The state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds 
     of adversaries and potential adversaries represent, in some 
     cases, strategic tools of their controlling governments and 
     their global operations and therefore warrant increased 
     scrutiny and knowledge.
       (5) Without improved situational awareness of the business 
     transactions and financial activities of state and non-state 
     adversaries and potential adversaries, as well as entities 
     they own and control, current efforts and deterrence 
     strategies will continue to represent an underdeveloped 
     defense requirement that lacks strategic direction.
       (b) Enhanced Situational Awareness Required.--The Secretary 
     of Defense shall take such steps as may be necessary to 
     improve--
       (1) the situational awareness capabilities of the 
     Department of Defense regarding the legal and licit business 
     transactions and global market positioning of adversaries and 
     potential adversaries; and
       (2) the ability of the Department to translate such 
     situational awareness into the intelligence, planning, 
     deterrence, and capabilities and strategies of the 
     Department.

     SEC. 1249. TREATMENT OF THE KURDISTAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND 
                   THE PATRIOTIC UNION OF KURDISTAN UNDER THE 
                   IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

       (a) Discretion to Exclude Kurdistan Democratic Party and 
     Patriotic Union of Kurdistan From Treatment as Terrorist 
     Organizations.--The Secretary of State, after consultation 
     with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney 
     General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, after 
     consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney 
     General, may exclude the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the 
     Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from the definition of terrorist 
     organization in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the Immigration 
     and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)) for the 
     limited purpose of issuing a temporary visa to a member of 
     the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of 
     Kurdistan.
       (b) Prohibition on Judicial Review.--Notwithstanding any 
     other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory), 
     section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
     1252), sections 1361 and 1651 of title 28, United States 
     Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other habeas corpus 
     provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review 
     any determination made pursuant to subsection (a).

     SEC. 1250. PROHIBITION ON INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN MISSILE 
                   DEFENSE SYSTEMS.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the 
     Department of Defense or for United States contributions to 
     the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or 
     expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People's 
     Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United 
     States.

          Subtitle F--Reports and Sense of Congress Provisions

     SEC. 1261. REPORT ON ``NEW NORMAL'' AND GENERAL MISSION 
                   REQUIREMENTS OF UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States Africa Command should have sufficient 
     assigned military forces; intelligence, surveillance, and 
     reconnaissance assets; crisis response forces; and enablers 
     to support the crisis response forces to meet the ``New 
     Normal'' and general mission requirements in the area of 
     responsibility of the United States Africa Command;
       (2) with the current force posture and structure of the 
     United States Africa Command, the United States is accepting 
     a high level of risk in defending United States posts that 
     are ``high risk, high threat'' posts;
       (3) the United States should posture forces forward and 
     achieve the associated basing and access agreements to 
     support such forces across the Continent of Africa in order 
     to meet the ``New Normal'' and general mission requirements 
     in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa 
     Command;
       (4) the Department of Defense should consider reassigning 
     to the United States Africa Command enabler assets currently 
     assigned to, and shared with, the United States European 
     Command; and
       (5) the United States Africa Command requires more 
     intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets to meet 
     the ``New Normal'' and general mission requirements in its 
     area of responsibility.
       (b) Report.--Not later than January 15, 2015, the Secretary 
     of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and 
     the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to 
     the appropriate congressional committees a report on the 
     extent to which the ``New Normal'' requirements have changed 
     the force posture and structure required of the United States 
     Africa Command to meet the ``New Normal'' and general mission 
     requirements in its area of responsibility.
       (c) Elements.--The report required by subsection (b) shall 
     include the following:
       (1) A detailed description of the ``New Normal'' and 
     general mission requirements in the area of responsibility of 
     the United States Africa Command.
       (2) A description of any changes required for the United 
     States Africa Command to meet the ``New Normal'' and general 
     mission requirements in its area of responsibility, including 
     the gaps or shortfalls in capability, size, posture, 
     agreements, basing, and enabler support of all crisis 
     response forces and associated assets to access and defend 
     posts that are ``high risk, high threat'' posts.
       (3) An assessment of how the United States Africa Command 
     could employ permanently assigned military forces to support 
     all mission requirements of the United States Africa Command.
       (4) An estimate of the annual intelligence, surveillance, 
     and reconnaissance requirements of the United States Africa 
     Command and the shortfall, if any, in meeting such 
     requirements in fiscal year 2015.
       (d) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (e) Form.--The report required by subsection (b) may 
     include a classified annex.

[[Page 8652]]



     SEC. 1262. REPORT ON CONTRACTORS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE THAT HAVE CONDUCTED SIGNIFICANT 
                   TRANSACTIONS WITH IRANIAN PERSONS OR THE 
                   GOVERNMENT OF IRAN.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a 
     period not to exceed 3 years, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 
     that contains the following:
       (1) A list of each contractor with the Department of 
     Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the 
     contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the 
     contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has 
     conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person 
     (other than an Iranian person listed under paragraph (2)) or 
     the Government of Iran.
       (2) A list of each contractor with the Department of 
     Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the 
     contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the 
     contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has 
     conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person 
     whose property has been blocked pursuant to Executive Order 
     13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 49079) or Executive Order 13382 (70 Fed. 
     Reg. 38567) during the 5-year period preceding the date of 
     the submission of the report.
       (3) The value of each significant transaction described in 
     paragraphs (1) and (2).
       (b) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

     SEC. 1263. REPORTS ON NUCLEAR PROGRAM OF IRAN.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to 
     Congress a report on the interim agreement relating to the 
     nuclear program of Iran. Such report shall include--
       (1) verification of whether Iran is complying with such 
     agreement; and
       (2) an assessment of the overall state of the nuclear 
     program of Iran.
       (b) Additional Reports.--If the interim agreement described 
     in subsection (a) is renewed or if a comprehensive and final 
     agreement is entered into regarding the nuclear program of 
     Iran, by not later than 90 days after such renewal or final 
     agreement being entered into, the President shall submit to 
     Congress a report on such renewed or final agreement. Such 
     report shall include the matters described in paragraphs (1) 
     and (2) of subsection (a).

     SEC. 1264. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON UNITED STATES PRESENCE AND 
                   COOPERATION IN THE ARABIAN GULF REGION TO DETER 
                   IRAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States should maintain a robust forward 
     presence and posture in order to support United States allies 
     and partners in the Arabian Gulf region, including Gulf 
     Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Israel, and to deter 
     Iran;
       (2) the United States should seek ways to support the 
     security posture of GCC countries in the Arabian Gulf region 
     to deter Iran;
       (3) key strategic United States bases in the Arabian Gulf 
     region that are used to deter Iran and would be used for any 
     military operations in the Arabian Gulf region are entirely 
     financed by funds for overseas contingency operations which 
     is an unsustainable approach;
       (4) such key strategic United States bases in the Arabian 
     Gulf region should be funded through the base budget of the 
     Department of Defense;
       (5) the United States does not have status of forces 
     agreements and defense agreements with key GCC allies, which 
     would support the defense of the Arabian Gulf region and 
     would deter Iran, and the United States should seek to 
     complete these agreements immediately;
       (6) the interim agreement with Iran relating to Iran's 
     nuclear program does not address key aspects of Iran's 
     nuclear program, including the possible military dimensions 
     of Iran's nuclear program;
       (7) a comprehensive agreement with Iran relating to Iran's 
     efforts to develop a nuclear weapons capability should 
     address past and present issues of concern of the United 
     States, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the 
     United Nations Security Council;
       (8) the United States should continue to put significant 
     pressure on Iran's network of organizations that conduct 
     malign activities in the Arabian Gulf region, and around the 
     globe, even while the United States engages in negotiations 
     with Iran relating to Iran's nuclear program;
       (9) the United States Government should not enter into a 
     contract with any person or entity that is determined to have 
     violated United States sanctions laws with respect to 
     contracting with the Government of Iran and should encourage 
     United States allies, partners, and other countries to 
     maintain the same contracting standard; and
       (10) a comprehensive agreement with Iran relating to Iran's 
     efforts to develop or acquire a nuclear weapons capability 
     should be agreed to by the United States only if--
       (A) Iran ceases the enrichment of uranium;
       (B) Iran has ceased the pursuit, acquisition, and 
     development of, and has verifiably dismantled its nuclear, 
     biological, and chemical weapons and ballistic missiles and 
     ballistic missile launch technology; and
       (C) the Government of Iran has ceased providing support for 
     acts of international terrorism.

     SEC. 1265. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MODERNIZATION OF DEFENSE 
                   CAPABILITIES OF POLAND.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The efforts of Poland to modernize its defense 
     capabilities and restructure its armed forces have the 
     potential not only to enhance the national security of Poland 
     but also to strengthen the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     (NATO).
       (2) The main priority of Poland with respect to such 
     efforts is to procure anti-aircraft and missile defense 
     systems.
       (3) At a time when most NATO allies are cutting defense 
     spending, Poland has maintained a steady defense budget and 
     is making significant investment in procurement of new 
     defense systems.
       (4) The United States should recognize the efforts of 
     Poland to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure 
     its armed forces and promote such efforts as a positive 
     example for other NATO allies to follow.
       (5) The United States has enjoyed a close cultural, 
     economic, political, and military relationship with Poland 
     for many years and the efforts of Poland to modernize its 
     defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces provide 
     opportunities for the two countries to work together even 
     more closely.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the President should seek to work with Poland to ensure 
     that, as part of the efforts of Poland to modernize its 
     defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces--
       (A) Poland, to the maximum extent practicable, procures 
     defense systems that are interoperable with NATO defense 
     systems and will help fill critical NATO shortfalls; and
       (B) Poland, to the maximum extent practicable and to the 
     extent not inconsistent with the provisions of subparagraph 
     (A), procures United States defense systems that--
       (i) will strengthen the bilateral, strategic partnership 
     between the two countries;
       (ii) will provide Poland with proven defense systems 
     capabilities; and
       (iii) promote deeper and closer bilateral cooperation 
     between the two countries; and
       (2) the United States stands ready to assist Poland to 
     achieve its goals to modernize its defense capabilities and 
     restructure its armed forces.

                TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

     SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 
                   PROGRAMS AND FUNDS.

       (a) Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction 
     Programs.--For purposes of section 301 and other provisions 
     of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the 
     programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
       (b) Fiscal Year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds 
     Defined.--As used in this title, the term ``fiscal year 2015 
     Cooperative Threat Reduction funds'' means the funds 
     appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
     in section 301 and made available by the funding table in 
     section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
       (c) Availability of Funds.--Funds appropriated pursuant to 
     the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made 
     available by the funding table in section 4301 for 
     Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for 
     obligation for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.

     SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.

       (a) Funding for Specific Purposes.--Of the $365,108,000 
     authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense 
     for fiscal year 2015 in section 301 and made available by the 
     funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat 
     Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated 
     for the purposes specified:
       (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,000,000.
       (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $15,720,000.
       (3) For global nuclear security, $17,703,000.
       (4) For cooperative biological engagement, $254,342,000.
       (5) For proliferation prevention, $46,124,000.
       (6) For threat reduction engagement, $2,375,000.
       (7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/
     Administrative Costs, $27,844,000.
       (b) Report on Obligation or Expenditure of Funds for Other 
     Purposes.--No fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction 
     funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a 
     purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 
     (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of 
     Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which 
     the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of 
     funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding 
     sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or 
     expenditure of fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction 
     funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure 
     of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or 
     any other provision of law.
       (c) Limited Authority to Vary Individual Amounts.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in 
     which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is 
     necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary 
     may obligate

[[Page 8653]]

     amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for a purpose 
     listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in 
     excess of the specific amount authorized for that purpose.
       (2) Notice-and-wait required.--An obligation of funds for a 
     purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 
     (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such 
     purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph 
     (1) only after--
       (A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the 
     intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the 
     justification for doing so; and
       (B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the 
     notification.

     SEC. 1303. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
                   COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH 
                   RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for Cooperative Threat Reduction may be 
     obligated or expended for cooperative threat reduction 
     activities with the Russian Federation until the date that is 
     30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense 
     certifies, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to 
     the appropriate congressional committees that--
       (1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no 
     longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
       (2) the Russian Federation is no longer acting 
     inconsistently with the INF Treaty; and
       (3) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE 
     Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of 
     its treaty obligations.
       (b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
     limitation in subsection (a) if--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the 
     Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional 
     committees--
       (A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national 
     security interest of the United States and a description of 
     the national security interest covered by the waiver; and
       (B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot 
     make the certification under subsection (a); and
       (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the 
     report under paragraph (1)(B).
       (c) Exception for Certain Military Bases.--The 
     certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of 
     subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the 
     Russian Federation in Ukraine's Crimean peninsula operating 
     in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and 
     Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory 
     of Ukraine.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
     ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate.
       (2) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris 
     November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
       (3) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty 
     Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet 
     Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-
     Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the 
     Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at 
     Washington December 8, 1987 and entered into force June 1, 
     1988.
       (e) Effective Date.--This section takes effect on the date 
     of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to 
     funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of 
     such date of enactment.

                    TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

                     Subtitle A--Military Programs

     SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1402. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 
                   DEFENSE.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense 
     for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided 
     for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, 
     as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
       (b) Use.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated under 
     subsection (a) are authorized for--
       (1) the destruction of lethal chemical Agents and munitions 
     in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 
     Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
       (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 
     United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such 
     Act.

     SEC. 1403. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
                   DEFENSE-WIDE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-
     Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding 
     table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1404. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector 
     General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1405. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces 
     and other activities and agencies of the Department of 
     Defense in providing for the health of eligible 
     beneficiaries.

                 Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

     SEC. 1411. REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DISPOSALS FROM 
                   THE NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE.

       (a) Fiscal Year 1999 Disposal Authority.--Section 
     3303(a)(7) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261; 
     50 U.S.C. 98d note), as most recently amended by section 
     1412(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 
     4649), is further amended by striking ``1,386,000,000 by the 
     end of fiscal year 2016'' and inserting ``$1,436,000,000 by 
     the end of fiscal year 2019''.
       (b) Fiscal Year 2000 Disposal Authority.--Section 
     3402(b)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106-65; 50 U.S.C. 98d note), as 
     most recently amended by section 1412 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;125 
     Stat. 1654), is further amended by striking ``$830,000,000 by 
     the end of fiscal year 2016'' and inserting ``$850,000,000 by 
     the end of 2019''.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
                   AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR 
                   CAPTAIN JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, 
                   ILLINOIS.

       (a) Authority for Transfer of Funds.--Of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available 
     for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, 
     $146,857,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense 
     to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans 
     Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by 
     subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 
     123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such 
     section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as 
     amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the 
     purpose of such a transfer.
       (b) Use of Transferred Funds.--For the purposes of 
     subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for 
     which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are 
     operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care 
     Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs 
     Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and 
     supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal 
     medical facility under an operational agreement covered by 
     section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 
     122 Stat. 4500).

     SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 
                   RETIREMENT HOME.

       There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund 
     the sum of $63,400,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces 
     Retirement Home.

   TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS 
                         CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 1501. PURPOSE.

       The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations 
     for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 to provide 
     additional funds for overseas contingency operations being 
     carried out by the Armed Forces.

     SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and 
     the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities 
     in the amount of $6,180,000,000.

     SEC. 1503. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and 
     maintenance in the amount of $64,040,000,000. In addition to 
     the authorization of appropriations in the preceding 
     sentence, funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
     fiscal year 2015 for the Department of the Air Force for the 
     purpose of maintaining, operating, and upgrading the A-10 
     aircraft fleet in the amount of $635,000,000.

     SEC. 1504. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel 
     in the amount of $7,140,000,000.

     SEC. 1505. OTHER APPROPRIATIONS.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated

[[Page 8654]]

     for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Other 
     Authorizations in the amount of $1,450,000,000.
       (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Other 
     Authorizations'' means the Defense Health Program, Drug 
     Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, and 
     National Guard and Reserve Equipment.

                     Subtitle B--Financial Matters

     SEC. 1511. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS.

       The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 
     in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act.

     SEC. 1512. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

       (a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
       (1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of 
     Defense that such action is necessary in the national 
     interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of 
     authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in 
     this title for fiscal year 2015 between any such 
     authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions 
     thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be 
     merged with and be available for the same purposes as the 
     authorization to which transferred.
       (2) Limitations.--The total amount of authorizations that 
     the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this 
     subsection may not exceed $3,000,000,000.
       (b) Terms and Conditions.--Transfers under this section 
     shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as 
     transfers under section 1001.
       (c) Additional Authority.--The transfer authority provided 
     by this section is in addition to the transfer authority 
     provided under section 1001.

          Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters

     SEC. 1521. CONTINUATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF 
                   FUNDS IN THE AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND.

       Funds available to the Department of Defense for the 
     Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall 
     be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) 
     through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 
     122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike 
     Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4424).

     SEC. 1522. USE OF AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM JOINT IMPROVISED 
                   EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.

       Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 
     (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the 
     amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 
     110-417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds made 
     available to the Department of Defense for the Joint 
     Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015.

     TITLE XVI--STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, CYBER, AND INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

                      Subtitle A--Space Activities

     SEC. 1601. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that--
       (1) critical United States national security space systems 
     are facing a serious growing foreign threat;
       (2) the People's Republic of China and the Russian 
     Federation are both developing capabilities to disrupt the 
     use of space by the United States in a conflict, as recently 
     outlined by the Director of National Intelligence in 
     testimony before Congress; and
       (3) a fully-developed multi-faceted space security and 
     defense program is needed to deter and defeat any 
     adversaries' acts of space aggression.
       (b) Report on Ability of the United States to Deter and 
     Defeat Adversary Space Aggression.--Not later than 180 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
     a report containing an assessment of the ability of the 
     Department of Defense to deter and defeat any act of space 
     aggression by an adversary.
       (c) Study on Alternative Defense and Deterrence Strategies 
     in Response to Foreign Counterspace Capabilities.--
       (1) Study required.--The Secretary of Defense, acting 
     through the Office of Net Assessment, shall conduct a study 
     of potential alternative defense and deterrent strategies in 
     response to the existing and projected counterspace 
     capabilities of China and Russia. Such study shall include an 
     assessment of the congruence of such strategies with the 
     current United States defense strategy and defense programs 
     of record, and the associated implications of pursuing such 
     strategies.
       (2) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees the results of the 
     study required under paragraph (1).

     SEC. 1602. EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE NOTIFICATION.

       (a) Notification.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall 
     provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of 
     each change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle 
     acquisition plan and schedule from the plan and schedule 
     included in the budget submitted by the President under 
     section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 
     2015. Such notification shall include--
       (1) an identification of the change;
       (2) a national security rationale for the change;
       (3) the impact of the change on the evolved expendable 
     launch vehicle block buy contract;
       (4) the impact of the change on the opportunities for 
     competition for certified evolved expendable launch vehicle 
     launch providers; and
       (5) the costs or savings of the change.
       (b) Applicability.--The requirement under subsection (a) 
     shall apply to fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section, 
     the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) with respect to a change to the evolved expendable 
     launch vehicle acquisition schedule for an intelligence-
     related launch, the Permanent Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select 
     Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

     SEC. 1603. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS RESPONSIBILITIES OF 
                   EXECUTIVE AGENT FOR SPACE.

       The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 180 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, revise 
     Department of Defense directives and guidance to require the 
     Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space to ensure 
     that in developing space strategies, architectures, and 
     programs for satellite communications, the Executive Agent 
     shall--
       (1) conduct strategic planning to ensure the Department of 
     Defense is effectively and efficiently meeting the satellite 
     communications requirements of the military departments and 
     commanders of the combatant commands;
       (2) coordinate with the secretaries of the military 
     departments and the heads of Defense Agencies to eliminate 
     duplication of effort and to ensure that resources are used 
     to achieve the maximum effort in related satellite 
     communication science and technology; research, development, 
     test and evaluation; production; and operations and 
     sustainment;
       (3) coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief 
     Information Officer of the Department to ensure that 
     effective and efficient acquisition approaches are being used 
     to acquire military and commercial satellite communications 
     for the Department, including space, ground, and user 
     terminal integration; and
       (4) coordinate with the chairman of the Joint Requirements 
     Oversight Council to develop a process to identify the 
     current and projected satellite communications requirements 
     of the Department.

     SEC. 1604. LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     the Secretary of Defense should develop a next-generation 
     liquid rocket engine that--
       (1) is made in the United States;
       (2) meets the requirements of the national security space 
     community;
       (3) is developed by not later than 2019;
       (4) is developed using full and open competition; and
       (5) is available for purchase by all space launch providers 
     of the United States.
       (b) Development.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop a 
     next-generation liquid rocket engine that enables the 
     effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use 
     of non-allied space launch engines to a domestic alternative 
     for national security space launches.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--Of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 
     2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air 
     Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4201, 
     $220,000,000 shall be available for the Secretary of Defense 
     to develop a next-generation liquid rocket engine.
       (c) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate with the 
     Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
     Administration, to the extent practicable, to ensure that the 
     rocket engine developed under subsection (b) meets objectives 
     that are common to both the national security space community 
     and the space program of the United States.
       (d) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with 
     the Administrator, shall submit to the appropriate 
     congressional committees a report that includes--
       (1) a plan to carry out the development of the rocket 
     engine under subsection (b), including an analysis of the 
     benefits of using public-private partnerships;
       (2) the requirements of the program to develop such rocket 
     engine; and
       (3) the estimated cost of such rocket engine.
       (e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means the following:
       (1) The congressional defense committees.
       (2) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, 
     Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
       (3) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
     House of Representatives and the Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the Senate.

     SEC. 1605. PILOT PROGRAM FOR ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL 
                   SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SERVICES.

       (a) Pilot Program.--

[[Page 8655]]

       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may develop and 
     carry out a pilot program to determine the feasibility and 
     advisability of expanding the use of working capital funds by 
     the Secretary to effectively and efficiently acquire 
     commercial satellite capabilities to meet the requirements of 
     the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant 
     commanders.
       (2) Funding.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2020 for the Department 
     of Defense for the acquisition of commercial satellite 
     communications, not more than $50,000,000 may be obligated or 
     expended for such pilot program during such a fiscal year.
       (3) Certain authorities.--In carrying out the pilot program 
     under paragraph (1), the Secretary may not use the 
     authorities provided in sections 2208(k) and 2210(b) of title 
     10, United States Code.
       (b) Goals.--In developing and carrying out the pilot 
     program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall ensure 
     that the pilot program--
       (1) provides a cost effective and strategic method to 
     acquire commercial satellite services;
       (2) incentivizes private-sector participation and 
     investment in technologies to meet future requirements of the 
     Department of Defense with respect to commercial satellite 
     services;
       (3) takes into account the potential for a surge or other 
     change in the demand of the Department for commercial 
     satellite communications access in response to global or 
     regional events; and
       (4) ensures the ability of the Secretary to control and 
     account for the cost of programs and work performed under the 
     pilot program.
       (c) Duration.--If the Secretary commences the pilot program 
     under subsection (a)(1), the pilot program shall terminate on 
     October 1, 2020.
       (d) Reports.--
       (1) Initial report.--Not later than 150 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees a report that includes a 
     plan and schedule to carry out the pilot program under 
     subsection (a)(1).
       (2) Final report.--Not later than December 1, 2020, the 
     Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report on the pilot program under subsection 
     (a)(1). The report shall include--
       (A) an assessment of expanding the use of working capital 
     funds to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial 
     satellite capabilities to meet the requirements of the 
     military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant 
     commanders; and
       (B) a description of--
       (i) any contract entered into under the pilot program, the 
     funding used under such contract, and the efficiencies 
     realized under such contract;
       (ii) the advantages and challenges of using working capital 
     funds as described in subparagraph (A);
       (iii) any additional authorities the Secretary determines 
     necessary to acquire commercial satellite capabilities as 
     described in subsection (a)(1); and
       (iv) any recommendations of the Secretary with respect to 
     improving or extending the pilot program.

  Subtitle B--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

     SEC. 1611. ASSESSMENT AND LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS 
                   FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS OF 
                   UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND AND 
                   SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES.

       (a) Assessment.--
       (1) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense, acting through 
     the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the 
     Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low 
     Intensity Conflict, and the Director of the Defense 
     Intelligence Agency, shall submit to the appropriate 
     committees of Congress an assessment of the intelligence 
     activities and programs of United States Special Operations 
     Command and special operations forces.
       (2) Inclusions.--The assessment under paragraph (1) shall 
     include each of the following elements:
       (A) An overall strategy defining such intelligence 
     activities and programs, including definitions of 
     intelligence activities and programs unique to special 
     operations.
       (B) A validated strategy and roadmap of intelligence, 
     surveillance, and reconnaissance programs and requirements 
     for special operations across the future years defense 
     program.
       (C) A comprehensive description of current and anticipated 
     future Joint Staff validated requirements for the 
     intelligence activities and programs of each geographic 
     combatant commander within the respective geographic area of 
     such covered combatant commander to be fulfilled by special 
     operations forces, including those that can only be addressed 
     by special operations forces, programs, or capabilities.
       (D) Validated present and planned United States Special 
     Operations Command force structure requirements to meet 
     current and anticipated special operations intelligence 
     activities and programs of geographic combatant commanders.
       (E) A comprehensive review and assessment of statutory 
     authorities, and Department and interagency policies, 
     including limitations, for special operations forces 
     intelligence activities and programs.
       (F) An independent, comprehensive cost estimate of special 
     operations intelligence activities and programs by the 
     Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the 
     Department of Defense, including an estimate of the costs of 
     the period of the current future years defense program, 
     including a description of all rules and assumptions used to 
     develop the cost estimates.
       (G) A copy of any memoranda of understanding or memoranda 
     of agreement between the Department of Defense and other 
     departments or agencies of the United States Government, or 
     between components of the Department of Defense that are 
     required to implement objectives of special operations 
     intelligence activities and programs.
       (H) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
       (3) Form.--The assessment required under paragraph (1) 
     shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
     classified annex.
       (b) Limitations.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), not more than 50 
     percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
     Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for 
     procurement, Defense-wide, or research, development, test, 
     and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the major force program 11 
     of the United States Special Operations Command may be 
     obligated until the assessment required under subsection (a) 
     is submitted.
       (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect 
     to funds authorized to be appropriated for Overseas 
     Contingency Operations under title XV.
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Appropriate committees of congress.--The term 
     ``appropriate committees of congress'' means the 
     congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select 
     Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, 
     and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
       (2) Future years defense program.--The term ``future years 
     defense program'' means the future years defense program 
     under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
       (3) Geographic combatant commander.--The term ``geographic 
     combatant commander'' means a commander of a combatant 
     command (as defined in section 161(c) of title 10, United 
     States Code) with a geographic area of responsibility.

     SEC. 1612. ANNUAL BRIEFING ON THE INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, 
                   AND RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 
                   COMBATANT COMMANDS.

       At the same time that the President's budget is submitted 
     pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, 
     for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020--
       (1) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide 
     to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select 
     Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, 
     and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a 
     briefing on--
       (A) the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
     requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of 
     each of the combatant commands;
       (B) for the year preceding the year in which the briefing 
     is provided, the satisfaction rate of each of the combatant 
     commands with the intelligence, surveillance, and 
     reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence 
     capability type, of such combatant command; and
       (C) a risk analysis identifying the critical gaps and 
     shortfalls in such requirements in relation to such 
     satisfaction rate; and
       (2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall 
     provide to the congressional defense committees, the 
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the Senate a briefing on short-term, mid-term, and long-term 
     strategies to address the critical intelligence, surveillance 
     and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands.

     SEC. 1613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF REPORT ON IMAGERY 
                   INTELLIGENCE AND GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SUPPORT 
                   PROVIDED TO REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND SECURITY 
                   ALLIANCES.

       Section 921(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1878) is 
     amended by striking ``2014 and 2015'' and inserting ``2014 
     through 2016''.

     SEC. 1614. TACTICAL EXPLOITATION OF NATIONAL CAPABILITIES 
                   EXECUTIVE AGENT.

       Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 430. TENCAP executive agent

       ``(a) In General.--There is in the Department of Defense a 
     Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive 
     Agent who shall be appointed by the Under Secretary of 
     Defense for Intelligence. The Executive Agent shall report 
     directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. 
     The Executive Agent shall be responsible for working with the 
     combatant commands, military services, and the intelligence 
     community to develop methods to increase warfighter 
     effectiveness through the exploitation of national 
     capabilities and to promote cross-domain integration of such 
     capabilities into military operations, training, 
     intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance activities.
       ``(b) Annual Briefing.--At the same time as the budget 
     materials are submitted to Congress in connection with the 
     submission of the budget for each of fiscal years 2016 
     through 2020, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the 
     Executive Agent, in coordination with the commanders of the 
     combatant commands, the Secretaries of the

[[Page 8656]]

     military departments, and the heads of the Department of 
     Defense intelligence agencies and offices, shall provide to 
     the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Armed 
     Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
     of the House of Representatives a briefing on the 
     investments, activities, challenges, and opportunities of the 
     Executive Agent in carrying out the responsibilities under 
     paragraph (1). The briefings shall be coordinated with each 
     of the armed services, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the 
     National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-
     Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance 
     office.''.

     SEC. 1615. AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence 
     Center provides essential national expertise on foreign 
     aerospace system capabilities, including cyber, space 
     systems, missiles, and aircraft.
       (2) The Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence 
     Center is organizationally aligned to the Headquarters Air 
     Staff, through the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and 
     Reconnaissance Agency.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence 
     Center provides indispensable intelligence support to a 
     variety of customers, including the Air Force, the Department 
     of Defense, the intelligence community, and national 
     policymakers; and
       (2) to maintain operational effectiveness, the Air Force 
     organizational reporting structure of the Air Force National 
     Air and Space Intelligence Center should remain 
     organizationally aligned to the Headquarters Air Staff with 
     reporting through the Vice Chief of Staff.
       (c) Plan.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent 
     Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the Senate a strategic plan for the intelligence organization 
     of the Air Force, including maintaining the National Air and 
     Space Intelligence Center alignment to the Headquarters Air 
     Staff.

     SEC. 1616. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM 
                   CONSOLIDATION.

       (a) Prohibition.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated 
     or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 
     be used during the period beginning on the date of the 
     enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to 
     execute--
       (1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program 
     budget from the Department of Defense budget;
       (2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program 
     budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
       (3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or 
     appropriations account structure for the National 
     Intelligence Program budget.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) National intelligence program.--The term ``National 
     Intelligence Program'' has the meaning given the term in 
     section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
     3003).
       (2) National intelligence program budget.--The term 
     ``National Intelligence Program budget'' means the portions 
     of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the 
     National Intelligence Program.

                 Subtitle C--Cyberspace-Related Matters

     SEC. 1621. EXECUTIVE AGENT FOR CYBER TEST AND TRAINING 
                   RANGES.

       (a) Executive Agent.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall designate a senior official of the Department of 
     Defense to act as the executive agent for cyber and 
     information technology test and training ranges.
       (b) Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities.--
       (1) Establishment.--Not later than one year after the 
     enactment of this Act, and in accordance with Directive 
     5101.1, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the roles, 
     responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent 
     designated under subsection (a).
       (2) Specification.--The roles and responsibilities of the 
     executive agent designated under subsection (a) shall include 
     each of the following:
       (A) Developing and maintaining a comprehensive list of 
     cyber and information technology ranges, test facilities, 
     test beds, and other means of testing, training, and 
     developing software, personnel, and tools for accommodating 
     the mission of the Department.
       (B) Serving as a single entity to organize and manage 
     designated cyber and information technology test ranges, 
     including--
       (i) establishing the priorities for cyber and information 
     technology ranges to meet Department objectives;
       (ii) enforcing standards to meet requirements specified by 
     the United States Cyber Command, the training community, and 
     the research, development, testing, and evaluation community;
       (iii) identifying and offering guidance on the 
     opportunities for integration amongst the designated cyber 
     and information technology ranges regarding test, training, 
     and development functions;
       (iv) finding opportunities for cost reduction, integration, 
     and coordination improvements for the appropriate cyber and 
     information technology ranges;
       (v) adding or consolidating cyber and information 
     technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving 
     needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the 
     Department; and
       (vi) coordinating with interagency and industry partners on 
     cyber and information technology range issues.
       (C) Defining a cyber range architecture that--
       (i) may add or consolidate cyber and information technology 
     ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the 
     cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department;
       (ii) coordinates with interagency and industry partners on 
     cyber and information technology range issues;
       (iii) allows for integrated closed loop testing in a secure 
     environment of cyber and electronic warfare capabilities;
       (iv) supports science and technology development, 
     experimentation, testing and training; and
       (v) provides for interconnection with other existing cyber 
     ranges and other kinetic range facilities in a distributed 
     manner.
       (D) Certifying all cyber range investments of the 
     Department of Defense.
       (E) Performing such other roles and responsibilities as the 
     Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
       (c) Support Within Department of Defense.--In accordance 
     with Directive 5101.1, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
     that the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other 
     components of the Department of Defense provide the executive 
     agent designated under subsection (a) with the appropriate 
     support and resources needed to perform the roles, 
     responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``designated cyber and information technology 
     range'' includes the National Cyber Range, the Joint 
     Information Operations Range, the Defense Information 
     Assurance Range, and the C4 Assessments Division of J6 of the 
     Joint Staff.
       (2) The term ``Directive 5101.1'' means Department of 
     Directive 5101.1, or any successor directive relating to the 
     responsibilities of an executive agent of the Department of 
     Defense.
       (3) The term ``executive agent'' has the meaning given the 
     term ``DoD Executive Agent'' in Directive 5101.1.

                       Subtitle D--Nuclear Forces

     SEC. 1631. PREPARATION OF ANNUAL BUDGET REQUEST REGARDING 
                   NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

       Section 179(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
       ``(3)(A) With respect to the preparation of a budget for a 
     fiscal year to be submitted by the President to Congress 
     under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense 
     may not agree to a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear 
     budget request authority unless the Secretary of Defense 
     submits to the congressional defense committees a 
     certification described in subparagraph (B).
       ``(B) A certification described in this subparagraph is a 
     certification that includes the following:
       ``(i) Certification that, during the fiscal year prior to 
     the fiscal year covered by the budget for which the 
     certification is submitted, the Secretary of Energy obligated 
     or expended any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of 
     estimated nuclear budget request authority made for such 
     prior fiscal year in a manner consistent with a memorandum of 
     agreement that was developed by the Nuclear Weapons Council 
     and entered into by the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Energy.
       ``(ii) A detailed assessment by the Nuclear Weapons Council 
     regarding how the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
     implemented any agreements and decisions of the Council made 
     during such prior fiscal year.
       ``(iii) An assessment from each of the Vice Chairman of the 
     Joints Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of the United States 
     Strategic Command regarding any effects to the military 
     during such prior fiscal year that were caused by the delay 
     or failure of the Administrator to implement any agreements 
     or decisions described in clause (ii).
       ``(4) The Secretary of Defense shall include with the 
     defense budget materials for a fiscal year the memorandum of 
     agreement described in paragraph (3)(B)(i) that covers such 
     fiscal year.
       ``(5)(A) Not later than 30 days after the President submits 
     to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section 
     1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States 
     Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the Joint 
     Chiefs of Staff an assessment of--
       ``(i) whether such budget allows the Federal Government to 
     meet the nuclear stockpile and stockpile stewardship program 
     requirements during the fiscal year covered by the budget and 
     the four subsequent fiscal years; and
       ``(ii) if the Commander determines that such budget does 
     not allow the Federal Government to meet such requirements, a 
     description of the steps being taken to meet such 
     requirements.
       ``(B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the 
     Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment 
     of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under 
     subparagraph (A), the Chairman shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees--
       ``(i) such assessment as it was submitted to the Chairman; 
     and

[[Page 8657]]

       ``(ii) any comments of the Chairman.
       ``(6) In this subsection:
       ``(A) The term `budget' has the meaning given that term in 
     section 231(f) of this title.
       ``(B) The term `defense budget materials' has the meaning 
     given that term in section 231(f) of this title.
       ``(C) The term `proposed transfer of estimated nuclear 
     budget request authority' means, in preparing a budget, a 
     request for the Secretary of Defense to transfer an estimated 
     amount of the proposed budget authority of the Secretary to 
     the Secretary of Energy for purposes relating to nuclear 
     weapons.''.

     SEC. 1632. INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE PERSONNEL RELIABILITY 
                   PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE 
                   HUMAN RELIABILITY PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   ENERGY.

       (a) Review.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Energy shall jointly seek to enter into a 
     contract with a federally funded research and development 
     center to conduct an independent review of the personnel 
     reliability program of the Department of Defense and the 
     human reliability program of the Department of Energy.
       (2) Matters included.--The review under paragraph (1) shall 
     include the following:
       (A) An examination of the costs and benefits of each 
     program described in paragraph (1).
       (B) Examples of successes and failures for each such 
     program.
       (C) The reporting and administrative requirements of each 
     such program.
       (D) The authorities and responsibilities of the commanders 
     and managers of each such program.
       (E) Guidance for when certain positions must be included in 
     each such program.
       (F) Recommendations with respect to making each such 
     program more effective, more efficient, and, to the extent 
     appropriate, more consistent between the Departments.
       (G) Any other matters the Secretaries jointly determine 
     appropriate.
       (b) Report.--Not later than October 1, 2015, the 
     Secretaries shall jointly submit to the congressional defense 
     committees such review.

     SEC. 1633. ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPON SECONDARY 
                   REQUIREMENT.

       (a) Assessment.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
     with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United 
     States Strategic Command, shall assess the annual secondary 
     production requirement needed to sustain a safe, secure, 
     reliable, and effective nuclear deterrent.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander 
     of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report regarding the 
     assessment conducted under subsection (a).
       (2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
     include the following:
       (A) An explanation of the rationale and assumptions that 
     led to the current 50 to 80 secondaries per year production 
     requirement, including the factors considered in determining 
     such requirement.
       (B) An analysis of whether there are any changes to such 50 
     to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including 
     the reasons for any such changes.
       (C) A description of how the secondary production 
     requirement is affected by or related to--
       (i) the demands of stockpile modernization, including the 
     schedule for life extension programs;
       (ii) the requirement for a responsive infrastructure, 
     including the ability to hedge against technical failure and 
     geopolitical risk; and
       (iii) the number of secondaries held in reserve or the 
     inactive stockpile, and the likelihood such secondaries may 
     be reused.
       (E) The proposed time frame for achieving such 50 to 80 
     secondaries per year production requirement.
       (3) Form.--The report under paragraph (1) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.

     SEC. 1634. RETENTION OF MISSILE SILOS.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that 
     recent authorization and appropriations Acts passed by 
     Congress and signed by the President have promulgated a 
     national policy that it is in the national security interests 
     of the United States to retain the maximum number of land-
     based strategic missile silos and their associated 
     infrastructure to ensure that billions of dollars in prior 
     taxpayer investments for such silos and infrastructure are 
     not lost through precipitous actions which may be budget-
     driven, cyclical, and not in the long-term strategic 
     interests of the United States.
       (b) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall preserve 
     each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a 
     deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act 
     in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to--
       (1) remain a fully functioning element of the 
     interconnected and redundant command and control system of 
     the missile field; and
       (2) be made fully operational with a deployed missile.
       (c) Termination.--The requirement in subsection (b) shall 
     terminate on February 5, 2021.

     SEC. 1635. CERTIFICATION ON NUCLEAR FORCE STRUCTURE.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in 
     coordination with the Commander of the United States 
     Strategic Command, shall certify to the congressional defense 
     committees that the plan for implementation of the New START 
     Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, 
     United States Code) announced on April 8, 2014, will enable 
     the United States to meet its obligations under such treaty 
     in a manner that ensures the nuclear forces of the United 
     States--
       (1) are capable, survivable, and balanced; and
       (2) maintain strategic stability, deterrence and extended 
     deterrence, and allied assurance.

                  Subtitle E--Missile Defense Programs

     SEC. 1641. THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OF ALLIES OF THE 
                   UNITED STATES.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) A Patriot battery of the United States providing a 
     short-range air and missile defense capability has previously 
     been rotationally deployed to Poland, pursuant to an 
     agreement between the United States and the Government of 
     Poland, during a period occurring between 2010 to 2012.
       (2) The deployment of the Patriot battery did not include 
     operational missiles and was not replaced with another short-
     range air and missile defense system upon completion of the 
     deployment rotation in 2012.
       (b) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States that 
     available short-range air and missile defense systems and 
     terminal missile defense systems of the United States with 
     operational missiles be rotationally deployed to central and 
     eastern European allies, pursuant to agreements between the 
     United States and such allies, to strengthen the air and 
     missile defense capabilities of such allies, as appropriate.
       (c) Aegis Ashore System.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than December 31, 2016, and 
     pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the 
     Government of Poland, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
     the operational availability of the Aegis Ashore system site 
     in Poland.
       (2) Relocation of assets.--The Secretary may relocate the 
     necessary assets of the Aegis weapon system between and 
     within the DDG-51 Class Destroyer program and the Aegis 
     Ashore program to meet mission requirements.
       (3) Briefings.--The Secretary shall provide to the 
     appropriate congressional committees quarterly briefings to 
     update the status of the progress in carrying out paragraph 
     (1).
       (4) Transfer authority.--The Secretary may use the 
     authority provided under section 1001 to carry out this 
     subsection.
       (d) Missile Defense Capability of Poland.--
       (1) Deployment.--Not later than December 31, 2014, and 
     pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the 
     Government of Poland, the Secretary of Defense shall deploy 
     to Poland a system providing a short-range air and missile 
     defense capability or terminal missile defense capability, or 
     both, and the personnel required to operate and maintain such 
     system.
       (2) Removal.--No action may be taken to effect or implement 
     the removal of the system or the personnel described in 
     paragraph (1) unless--
       (A) at least 30 days before the removal, the Secretary of 
     Defense notifies the appropriate congressional committees 
     that such removal is in the national security interests of 
     the United States; or
       (B) the removal is requested by the Government of Poland in 
     the manner provided in the agreement between the United 
     States and the Government of Poland regarding the system and 
     personnel.
       (e) Notification.--The Secretary of Defense shall notify 
     the appropriate congressional committees by not later than 60 
     days after the date on which a NATO member state makes a 
     request that communicates to the Secretary the interest of 
     the member state in hosting missile defense capabilities 
     described in subsection (b) and the plan of the Secretary for 
     addressing such request.
       (f) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means the following:
       (1) The congressional defense committees.
       (2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1642. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF 
                   CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENT II EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL 
                   VEHICLE.

       It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 
     should not procure an additional capability enhancement II 
     exoatmospheric kill vehicle for deployment until after the 
     date on which a successful intercept flight test of the 
     capability enhancement II ground-based interceptor has 
     occurred, unless such procurement is for test assets or to 
     maintain a warm line for the industrial base.

   TITLE XVII--DEFENSE AUDIT ADVISORY PANEL ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                              AUDITABILITY

     SEC. 1701. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) Congress remains steadfast in supporting the continuing 
     efforts of the Department of Defense to produce auditable 
     financial statements. Such efforts are essential to ensure 
     taxpayers dollars are accounted for at the largest department 
     of the Federal Government
       (2) As the 2017 and 2019 statutory audit deadlines 
     approach, Congress believes an advisory panel is necessary to 
     better track the Department's progress.

[[Page 8658]]

       (b) Purposes.--The purposes of the Advisory Panel are--
       (1) to work on behalf of Congress to actively monitor the 
     audit readiness work of the Department of Defense and, after 
     September 30, 2017, the Department's 2018 audit; and
       (2) to regularly providing interim findings and 
     recommendations to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and the House of Representatives, with the purpose of 
     making the Department auditable and aiding in oversight of 
     the Department by such Committees.

     SEC. 1702. ESTABLISHMENT OF ADVISORY PANEL ON DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE AUDIT READINESS.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established the Advisory Panel 
     on Department of Defense Audit Readiness (in this title 
     referred to as the ``Advisory Panel'').
       (b) Membership.--
       (1) Composition.--The Advisory Panel shall be composed of 
     10 members, of whom--
       (A) two shall be appointed jointly by the Chairman of the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Chairman of 
     the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
     Representatives, in consultation with the Ranking Member of 
     each such Committee, from among members of different 
     political parties from each such Committee, to serve as Co-
     Chairmen of the Advisory Panel;
       (B) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee 
     on Armed Services of the Senate;
       (C) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
       (D) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee 
     on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
       (E) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
       (2) Appointment date.--The appointments of the members of 
     the Advisory Panel shall be made not later than 30 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (3) Qualifications.--Appointments to the Advisory Panel 
     shall be made from among individuals who are certified public 
     accountants and have work experience within the Department of 
     Defense or private financial management sectors. An 
     individual who is an officer or employee of the Federal 
     Government may not be appointed to the Advisory Panel.
       (c) Period of Appointment; Vacancies.--Members shall be 
     appointed for the life of the Advisory Panel. Any vacancy in 
     the Advisory Panel shall not affect its powers, but shall be 
     filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
       (d) Initial Meeting.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
     on which all members of the Advisory Panel have been 
     appointed, the Advisory Panel shall hold its first meeting.
       (e) Meetings.--The Advisory Panel shall meet regularly at 
     the call of the Co-Chairmen.
       (f) Quorum.--Five members of the Advisory Panel shall 
     constitute a quorum, but four members may hold hearings.

     SEC. 1703. DUTIES OF THE ADVISORY PANEL.

       (a) In General.--The duties of the Advisory Panel are as 
     follows:
       (1) To provide the Secretary of Defense, through the Under 
     Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), independent advice on the 
     Department's financial management, including the financial 
     reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit 
     process, and processes for monitoring compliance with 
     applicable laws and regulations.
       (2) To identify, review, and evaluate the work of the 
     Department of Defense (including the work of each military 
     department and Defense Agency) on auditability.
       (3) To identify problem areas and recommend solutions in 
     order to aid the Department in meeting the following 
     statutory deadlines:
       (A) By not later than September 30, 2017, validating the 
     financial statements of the Department of Defense as ready 
     for audit, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
     (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).
       (B) By not later than March 31, 2019, auditing the 
     financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal 
     year 2018, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(a)(iii) of such 
     Act (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note)
       (4) To provide briefings regularly to the Committees on 
     Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
     on the Advisory Panel's findings, analysis, and 
     recommendations.
       (b) Reports.--Not later than March 31 and September 30 of 
     each year during the life of the Advisory Panel, beginning 
     with March 31, 2015, the Advisory Panel shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees findings and conclusions of 
     the Advisory Panel as a result of its work under subsection 
     (a) during the period covered by the report, together with 
     such recommendations as it considers appropriate.
       (c) Authority of Under Secretary of Defense 
     (Comptroller).--In accordance with Department policy and 
     procedures, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is 
     authorized to act upon the advice emanating from the Advisory 
     Panel.

     SEC. 1704. POWERS OF THE ADVISORY PANEL.

       (a) Hearings.--The Advisory Panel may hold such hearings, 
     sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, 
     and receive such evidence as the Advisory Panel considers 
     advisable to carry out this title.
       (b) Information From Department of Defense.--The Advisory 
     Panel may secure directly from the Department of Defense such 
     information as the Advisory Panel considers necessary to 
     carry out this title. Upon request of the Co-Chairmen of the 
     Advisory Panel, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such 
     information to the Advisory Panel.
       (c) Postal Services.--The Advisory Panel may use the United 
     States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions 
     as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.

     SEC. 1705. ADVISORY PANEL PERSONNEL MATTERS.

       (a) Compensation of Members.--Members of the Advisory Panel 
     shall serve without compensation for such service.
       (b) Travel Expenses.--Each member of the Advisory Panel 
     shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu 
     of subsistence, in accordance with applicable provisions 
     under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States 
     Code.
       (c) Staff.--
       (1) Director.--The Advisory Panel may have a Director, who 
     shall be appointed by the Co-Chairmen.
       (2) Staff.--The Co-Chairmen may appoint such additional 
     staff as may be necessary to enable the Advisory Panel to 
     perform its duties, except that the number of staff may not 
     exceed the equivalent of five full-time employees.
       (3) Compensation.--The Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel 
     may fix the compensation of the Director and other personnel 
     without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 
     of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of 
     positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the 
     rate of pay for the Director and other personnel may not 
     exceed the rate payable for level IV of the Executive 
     Schedule under section 5315 of such title.
       (d) Detail of Government Employees.--Any Federal Government 
     employee may be detailed to the Advisory Panel without 
     reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption 
     or loss of civil service status or privilege.
       (e) Procurement of Temporary and Intermittent Services.--
     The Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel may procure temporary 
     and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, 
     United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not 
     exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay 
     prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under 
     section 5316 of such title.

     SEC. 1706. TERMINATION OF THE ADVISORY PANEL.

       The Advisory Panel shall terminate April 30, 2019.

            DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

     SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.

       This division may be cited as the ``Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015''.

     SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED 
                   TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW.

       (a) Expiration of Authorizations After Three Years.--Except 
     as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained 
     in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction 
     projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and 
     facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations 
     of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of--
       (1) October 1, 2017; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
     for military construction for fiscal year 2018.
       (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
     authorizations for military construction projects, land 
     acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and 
     contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     Security Investment Program (and authorizations of 
     appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
     been obligated before the later of--
       (1) October 1, 2017; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
     for fiscal year 2018 for military construction projects, land 
     acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or 
     contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     Security Investment Program.

     SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE.

       Titles XXI through XXVII shall take effect on the later 
     of--
       (1) October 1, 2014; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

                 TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

[[Page 8659]]



                     Army: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Installation or
             State                     Location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California....................  Concord...............       $15,200,000
                                Fort Irwin............       $45,000,000
Colorado......................  Fort Carson...........       $89,000,000
Hawaii........................  Fort Shafter..........       $83,000,000
Kentucky......................  Blue Grass Army Depot.       $15,000,000
                                Fort Campbell.........       $23,000,000
New York......................  Fort Drum.............       $27,000,000
Pennsylvania..................  Letterkenny Army Depot       $16,000,000
South Carolina................  Fort Jackson..........       $52,000,000
Texas.........................  Fort Hood.............       $46,000,000
Virginia......................  Fort Lee..............       $86,000,000
                                Joint Base Langley-           $7,700,000
                                 Eustis...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out the military construction project for 
     the installations or locations outside the United States, and 
     in the amount, set forth in the following table:

                     Army: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Country             Installation or Location       Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guantanamo Bay...............  Guantanamo Bay..........      $92,800,000
Japan........................  Kadena Air Base.........      $10,600,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.

       (a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts 
     appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
     in section 2103 and available for military family housing 
     functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
     the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family 
     housing units (including land acquisition and supporting 
     facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number 
     of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following 
     table:

                                              Army: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              State/Country                      Installation                    Units                Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illinois................................   Rock Island..............  Family Housing New             $19,500,000
                                                                       Construction.............
Korea...................................  Camp Walker...............  Family Housing New             $57,800,000
                                                                       Construction.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military family housing functions as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary 
     of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering 
     services and construction design activities with respect to 
     the construction or improvement of family housing units in an 
     amount not to exceed $1,309,000.

     SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
     after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land 
     acquisition, and military family housing functions of the 
     Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601.
       (b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
     Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 
     2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost 
     variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
     carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the 
     total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection 
     (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2104. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 
     117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for 
     construction of an Explosives Research and Development 
     Loading Facility at the installation, the Secretary of the 
     Army may use available unobligated balances of amounts 
     appropriated for military construction for the Army to 
     complete work on the project within the scope specified for 
     the project in the justification data provided to Congress as 
     part of the request for authorization of the project.

     SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECTS.

       (a) Fort Drum.--In the case of the authorization contained 
     in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for 
     construction of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the 
     installation, the Secretary of the Army may provide a capital 
     contribution to a public or private utility company in order 
     for the utility company to extend the utility company's gas 
     line to the installation boundary. Such capital contribution 
     is not a change in the scope of work of the project under 
     section 2853 of title 10, United States Code.
       (b) Fort Leonard Wood.--In the case of the authorization 
     contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division 
     B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Leonard 
     Wood, Missouri, for construction of Battalion Complex 
     Facilities at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may 
     construct the Battalion Headquarters with classrooms for a 
     unit other than a Global Defense Posture Realignment unit.
       (c) Fort McNair.--In the case of the authorization 
     contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division 
     B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort McNair, 
     District of Columbia, for construction of a Vehicle Storage 
     Building at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may 
     construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle storage.
       (d) Fort Belvoir.--The table in section 2101(a) of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) is amended 
     in the item relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, by striking 
     ``$94,000,000'' in the amount column and inserting 
     ``$183,000,000''.

     SEC. 2106. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECT.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437) and 
     extended by section 2109 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public 
     Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 988), shall remain in effect until 
     October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
     authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
     2016, whichever is later:
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

[[Page 8660]]



                                  Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 State                    Installation or Location             Project                Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia................................  Fort Benning..............  Land Acquisition..........      $12,200,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2012 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the 
     enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
     construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later:
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) as 
     follows:

                                 Army: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  State                    Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia.................................  Fort Benning..............  Land Acquisition..........      $5,100,000
                                          Fort Benning..............  Land Acquisition..........     $25,000,000
North Carolina..........................  Fort Bragg................  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle        $54,000,000
                                                                       Maintenance Hanger.
Texas...................................  Fort Bliss................  Applied Instruction             $8,300,000
                                                                       Building.
                                          Fort Bliss................  Vehicle Maintenance            $19,000,000
                                                                       Facility.
                                          Fort Hood.................  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle        $47,000,000
                                                                       Maintenance Hanger.
Virginia................................  Fort Belvoir..............  Road and Infrastructure        $25,000,000
                                                                       Improvements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2204 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                         Navy: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     State                                  Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona.......................................  Yuma...........................................      $16,608,000
California....................................  Bridgeport.....................................      $16,180,000
                                                San Diego......................................      $47,110,000
District of Columbia..........................  Naval Support Activity.........................      $31,735,000
Florida.......................................  Jacksonville...................................      $30,235,000
                                                Mayport........................................      $20,520,000
Guam..........................................  Joint Region Marianas..........................      $50,651,000
Hawaii........................................  Kaneohe Bay....................................      $53,382,000
                                                Pearl Harbor...................................       $9,698,000
Maryland......................................  Annanpolis.....................................     $120,112,000
                                                Indian Head....................................      $15,346,000
                                                Patuxent River.................................       $9,860,000
Nevada........................................  Fallon.........................................      $31,262,000
North Carolina................................  Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station..........      $41,588,000
Pennsylvania..................................   Philadelphia..................................      $23,985,000
South Carolina................................  Charleston.....................................      $35,716,000
Virginia......................................  Dahlgren.......................................      $27,313,000
                                                Norfolk........................................      $39,274,000
                                                Portsmouth.....................................       $9,743,000
                                                Quantico.......................................      $12,613,000
                                                Yorktown.......................................      $26,988,000
Washington....................................  Bremerton......................................      $16,401,000
                                                Port Angeles...................................      $20,638,000
                                                Whidbey Island.................................      $24,390,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2204 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installation or location outside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                         Navy: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                 Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain.......................................  South West Asia.................................     $27,826,000
Djibouti......................................  Camp Lemonier...................................      $9,923,000

[[Page 8661]]

 
Japan.........................................  Iwakuni.........................................      $6,415,000
                                                Kadena Air Base.................................     $19,411,000
                                                Marine Corps Air Station Futenma................      $4,639,000
                                                Okinawa.........................................     $35,685,000
Spain.........................................  Rota............................................     $20,233,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (c) Unspecified Worldwide.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2204 and available for military construction projects at 
     unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding 
     table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire 
     real property and carry out military construction projects 
     for unspecified locations, and in the amount, set forth in 
     the following table:

                                      Navy: Unspecified Worldwide Locations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                         Location                          Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unspecified Worldwide Locations...............  Unspecified Worldwide Locations.................     $38,985,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2204 and available for military 
     family housing functions as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out 
     architectural and engineering services and construction 
     design activities with respect to the construction or 
     improvement of family housing units in an amount not to 
     exceed $472,000.

     SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

       Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
     and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military 
     family housing functions as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing 
     military family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
     $15,940,000.

     SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
     after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land 
     acquisition, and military family housing functions of the 
     Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601.
       (b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
     Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 
     2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost 
     variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
     carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the 
     total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection 
     (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS.

       (a) Yuma.--In the case of the authorization contained in 
     the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for 
     construction of a Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the 
     Secretary of the Navy may construct up to approximately 
     70,000 square feet of additional apron to be utilized as a 
     taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
       (b) Camp Pendelton.--In the case of the authorization 
     contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division 
     B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Camp Pendelton, 
     California, for construction of an Infantry Squad Defense 
     Range, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to 9,000 
     square feet of vehicular bridge using amounts appropriated 
     for this project pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
       (c) Kings Bay.--In the case of the authorization contained 
     in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay, Georgia, for 
     construction of a Crab Island Security Enclave, the Secretary 
     of the Navy may expand the enclave fencing system to three 
     layers of fencing and construct two elevated fixed fighting 
     positions with associated supporting facilities using amounts 
     appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 
     1667).

     SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 989), for Yorktown, Virginia, for construction of 
     Small Arms Ranges, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 
     240 square meters of armory, 48 square meters of Safety 
     Officer/Target Storage Building, and 667 square meters of 
     Range Operations Building using appropriations available for 
     the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
     in section 2204 of such Act (127 Stat. 990).

     SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441) and 
     extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public 
     Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until 
     October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for 
     military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is 
     later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                                 Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              State/Country                Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain.................................  South West Asia...........  Navy Central Command           $89,280,000
                                                                       Ammunition Magazines.
Guam....................................  Naval Activities, Guam....  Defense Access Roads           $66,730,000
                                                                       Improvements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2208. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2012 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act 
     authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
     2016, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                                 Navy: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              State/Country                Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California..............................  Camp Pendelton............  North Area Waste Water         $78,271,000
                                                                       Conveyance...............

[[Page 8662]]

 
                                          Camp Pendelton............  Infantry Squad Defense         $29,187,000
                                                                       Range....................
                                          Twentynine Palms..........  Land Expansion............      $8,665,000
Florida.................................  Jacksonville..............  P-8A Hangar Upgrades......      $6,085,000
Georgia.................................  Kings Bay.................  Crab Island Security           $52,913,000
                                                                       Enclave..................
                                          Kings Bay.................  WRA Land/Water Interface..     $33,150,000
Maryland................................  Patuxent River............  Aircraft Prototype             $45,844,000
                                                                       Facility Phase 2.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2302 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                       Air Force: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      State                                 Installation or Location                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska..........................................  Clear Air Force Base.......................        $11,500,000
Arizona.........................................  Luke Air Force Base........................        $26,800,000
Guam............................................  Joint Region Marianas......................        $13,400,000
Kansas..........................................  McConnell Air Force Base...................        $34,400,000
Massachusetts...................................  Hanscom Air Force Base.....................        $13,500,000
Nevada..........................................  Nellis Air Force Base......................        $53,900,000
New Jersey......................................  Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst...........         $5,900,000
Oklahoma........................................  Tinker Air Force Base......................       $111,000,000
Texas...........................................  Joint Base San Antonio.....................         $5,800,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2302 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installation outside the United States, and in the amount, 
     set forth in the following table:

                                      Air Force: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                        Installation                       Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United Kingdom.................................  Croughton Royal Air Force Base.................     $92,223,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
     after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land 
     acquisition functions of the Department of the Air Force, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4601.
       (b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
     Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 
     2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost 
     variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
     carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the 
     total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection 
     (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2303. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110-181; 
     122 Stat. 515), for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, for 
     base infrastructure at that location, the Secretary of the 
     Air Force may acquire fee or lesser real property interests 
     in approximately 11.5 acres of land contiguous to Shaw Air 
     Force Base for the project using funds appropriated to the 
     Department of the Air Force for construction in years prior 
     to fiscal year 2015.

     SEC. 2304. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECT.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444) and 
     extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public 
     Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until 
     October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
     authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
     2016, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                               Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Country                   Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain.................................  Shaikh Isa Air Base.......  North Apron Expansion.....    $45,000,000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2305. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2012 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the 
     enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
     construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

[[Page 8663]]



                               Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              State/Country                Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska..................................  Eielson AFB...............  Dormitory (168 RM)........     $45,000,000
Italy...................................  Sigonella Naval Air         UAS SATCOM Relay Pads and      $15,000,000
                                           Station..................   Facility.................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

               Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

     SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                   Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      State                                 Installation or Location                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona.........................................  Fort Huachuca..............................         $1,871,000
California......................................  Camp Pendelton.............................        $11,841,000
                                                  Coronado...................................       $70, 340,000
                                                  Lemoore....................................        $52,500,000
Colorado........................................  Peterson Air Force Base....................        $15,200,000
Georgia.........................................  Hunter Army Airfield.......................         $7,692,000
                                                  Robins Air Force Base......................        $19,900,000
Hawaii..........................................  Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam.............        $52,900,000
Kentucky........................................  Fort Campbell..............................        $18,000,000
Maryland........................................  Fort Meade.................................        $54,207,000
                                                  Joint Base Andrews.........................        $18,300,000
Michigan........................................  Selfridge Air National Guard Base..........        $35,100,000
Mississippi.....................................  Stennis....................................        $27,547,000
Nevada..........................................  Fallon.....................................        $20,241,000
New Mexico......................................  Cannon Air Force Base......................        $23,333,000
North Carolina..................................  Camp Lejeune...............................        $52,748,000
                                                  Fort Bragg.................................        $93,136,000
                                                  Seymour Johnson AFB........................         $8,500,000
South Carolina..................................  Beaufort...................................        $40,600,000
South Dakota....................................  Ellsworth Air Force Base...................         $8,000,000
Texas...........................................  Joint Base San Antonio.....................        $38,300,000
Virginia........................................  Craney Island..............................        $36,500,000
                                                  Defense Distribution Depot Richmond........         $5,700,000
                                                  Fort Belvoir...............................         $7,239,000
                                                  Joint Base Langley-Eustis..................        $41,200,000
                                                  Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story        $39,588,000
                                                  Pentagon...................................        $15,100,000
CONUS Classified................................  Classified Location........................        $53,073,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations outside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                   Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Country                                Installation or Location                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Australia.......................................  Geraldton..................................         $9,600,000
Belgium.........................................  Brussels...................................        $79,544,000
Guantanamo Bay..................................  Guantanamo Bay.............................        $76,290,000
Japan...........................................  Misawa Air Base............................        $37,775,000
                                                  Okinawa....................................       $170,901,000
                                                  Sasebo.....................................        $37,681,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for energy conservation projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy 
     conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United 
     States Code, for the installations or locations inside the 
     United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
     table:

[[Page 8664]]



                             Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     State                                 Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.....................................  Edwards Air Force Base......................         $4,500,000
                                                 Fort Hunter Liggett.........................        $13,500,000
                                                 Vandenberg Air Force Base...................         $7,197,000
Colorado.......................................  Fort Carson.................................         $3,000,000
Florida........................................  Eglin Air Force Base........................         $3,850,000
Georgia........................................  Moody Air Force Base........................         $3,600,000
Hawaii.........................................  Marine Corps Base Hawaii....................         $8,460,000
Illinois.......................................  Great Lakes Naval Station...................         $2,190,000
Maine..........................................  Portsmouth Naval Shipyard...................         $2,740,000
Maryland.......................................  Fort Detrick................................         $2,100,000
North Dakota...................................  Offutt Air Force Base.......................         $2,869,000
Oklahoma.......................................  Tinker Air Force Base.......................         $3,609,000
Oregon.........................................  Oregon City Armory..........................         $6,600,000
Utah...........................................  Dugway Proving Ground.......................        $15,400,000
Virginia.......................................  Naval Station Norfolk.......................        $11,360,000
                                                 Pentagon....................................         $2,120,000
Various Locations..............................  Various Locations...........................        $23,679,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy 
     conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United 
     States Code, for the installations or locations outside the 
     United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
     table:

                             Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diego Garcia...................................  Naval Support Facility......................        $14,620,000
Japan..........................................  Fleet Activities Yokosuka...................         $8,030,000
Germany........................................  Spangdahlem.................................         $4,800,000
Various Locations..............................  Various Locations...........................         $5,776,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (c) Limitation on Set-aside of Facilities Restoration and 
     Modernization Program Funds for Energy Projects.--Amounts 
     appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriation 
     in section 301 for operation and maintenance and made 
     available for facilities restoration and modernization may 
     not be set-aside for the exclusive purpose of funding energy 
     projects on military installations. Installation energy 
     projects must compete in the normal process of determining 
     installation requirements.

     SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
     after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land 
     acquisition, and military family housing functions of the 
     Department of Defense (other than the military departments), 
     as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
       (b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
     Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 
     2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost 
     variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
     carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the 
     total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection 
     (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2401 of that Act (124 Stat. 4446), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act 
     authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
     2016, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                           Defense Agencies: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  State                    Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia....................  Bolling Air Force Base....  Cooling Tower Expansion...      $2,070,000
                                                                      DIAC Parking Garage.......     $13,586,000
                                                                      Electrical Upgrades.......      $1,080,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2405. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2012 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the 
     enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
     construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                           Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              State/Country                Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California..............................  Coronado..................  SOF Support Activity           $42,000,000
                                                                       Operations Facility......
Germany.................................  USAG Baumholder...........  Wetzel-Smith Elementary        $59,419,000
                                                                       School...................
Italy...................................  USAG Vicenza..............  Vicenza High School.......     $41,864,000
Japan...................................  Yokota Air Base...........  Yokota High School........     $49,606,000
Virginia................................  Pentagon Reservation......  Heliport Control Tower and      $6,457,000
                                                                       Fire Station.............
                                                                      Pedestrian Plaza..........      $2,285,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 8665]]

     SEC. 2406. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 
                   CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS PENDING 
                   SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED REPORTS.

       (a) Limitation.--No amounts may be obligated or expended 
     for the military construction projects described in 
     subsection (b) and otherwise authorized by section 2401(a) 
     until both of the reports described in subsection (c) have 
     been submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and the House of Representatives.
       (b) Covered Projects.--The limitation imposed by subsection 
     (a) applies to the following military construction projects:
       (1) The construction of a human performance center facility 
     at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story, Virginia.
       (2) The construction of a squadron operations facility at 
     Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico.
       (c) Reports Described.--The reports referred to in 
     subsection (a) are--
       (1) the report on the United States Special Operations 
     Command Preservation of the Force and Families initiative 
     requested under the heading ``U.S. Special Operations Command 
     Military Construction Requirements'' in the Joint Explanatory 
     Statement to Accompany the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014, as printed in the Congressional Record 
     on December 12, 2013 (page H7956); and
       (2) the report on the review of Department of Defense 
     efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among members of 
     United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents 
     required by section 581 of this Act.

          Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

     SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL 
                   DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
     after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land 
     acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in 
     the funding table in section 4601.
       (b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
     Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 
     2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost 
     variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
     carried out under subsection (a) may not exceed the total 
     amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2412. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECT.

       (a) Modification.--The table in section 2401(a) of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 
     (division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended 
     by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107-107; 
     115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public 
     Law 107-314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division 
     B of Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4450), is 
     amended--
       (1) in the item relating to Blue Grass Army Depot, 
     Kentucky, by striking ``$746,000,000'' in the amount column 
     and inserting ``$780,000,000''; and
       (2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the 
     amount column and inserting ``$1,237,920,000''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2405(b)(3) of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 
     (division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 839), as amended 
     by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107-107; 
     115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public 
     Law 107-314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division 
     B of Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4450), is 
     further amended by striking ``$723,200,000'' and inserting 
     ``$757,200,000''.

   TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT 
                                PROGRAM

     SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECTS.

       The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the 
     North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
     Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United 
     States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount 
     authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 
     2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization as a result of construction previously financed 
     by the United States.

     SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2014, for contributions 
     by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, 
     United States Code, for the share of the United States of the 
     cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4601.

            TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

 Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
                   LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and 
     in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

              Army National Guard: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             State                      Location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delaware.......................  Dagsboro..............      $10,800,000
Maine..........................   Augusta..............      $30,000,000
Maryland.......................  Havre De Grace........      $12,400,000
Montana........................  Helena................      $38,000,000
New Mexico.....................  Alamogordo............       $5,000,000
North Dakota...................  Valley City...........      $10,800,000
Vermont........................  North Hyde Park.......       $4,400,000
Washington.....................  Yakima................      $19,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the 
     amounts, set forth in the following table:

                              Army Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             State                      Location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.....................  Fresno................      $22,000,000
                                 March Air Force Base..      $25,000,000
Colorado.......................  Fort Carson...........       $5,000,000
Illinois.......................  Arlington Heights.....      $26,000,000
Mississippi....................  Starkville............       $9,300,000
New Jersey.....................  Joint Base McGuire-Dix-     $26,000,000
                                  Lakehurst.
New York.......................  Mattydale.............      $23,000,000

[[Page 8666]]

 
Virginia.......................  Fort Lee..............      $16,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
                   CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the 
     United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
     table:

                  Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            State                      Location               Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pennsylvania.................   Pittsburgh.............      $17,650,000
Washington...................  Whidbey Island..........      $27,755,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
                   LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                               Air National Guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     State                                          Location                          Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connecticut....................................   Bradley International Airport................      $16,306,000
Iowa...........................................  Des Moines Municipal Airport..................       $8,993,000
 Michigan......................................  W.K. Kellog Regional Airport..................       $6,000,000
New Hampshire..................................  Pease International Trade Port................      $41,902,000
Pennsylvania...................................  Willow Grove Air Reserve Field................       $5,662,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                            Air Force Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            State                      Location               Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia......................  Robins Air Force Base...      $27,700,000
North Carolina...............   Seymour Johnson Air           $9,800,000
                                Force Base.
Texas........................  Forth Worth.............       $3,700,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 
                   AND RESERVE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2014, for the costs of 
     acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and 
     construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, 
     and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 
     10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of 
     land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table 
     in section 4601.

                       Subtitle B--Other Matters

     SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY 
                   OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS.

       (a) Modification.--
       (1) Kansas city.--In the case of the authorization 
     contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division 
     B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Kansas City, 
     Kansas, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that 
     location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new 
     facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas, instead of 
     constructing a new facility in Kansas City.
       (2) Attleboro.--In the case of the authorization contained 
     in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, 
     for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, 
     the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the 
     vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts, instead of constructing 
     a new facility in Attleboro.
       (b) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the 
     authorizations set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in 
     effect until October 1, 2018, or the date of the enactment of 
     an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 
     year 2019, whichever is later.

     SEC. 2612. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 
     Stat. 2133) for Stormville, New York, for construction of a 
     Combined Support Maintenance Shop Phase I, the Secretary of 
     the Army may instead construct the facility at Camp Smith, 
     New York, and build a 53,760 square foot maintenance facility 
     in lieu of a 75,156 square foot maintenance facility.

     SEC. 2613. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECT.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2601 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452) and 
     extended by section 2612 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public 
     Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1003), shall remain in effect until 
     October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
     authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
     2016, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is a 
     follows:

[[Page 8667]]



                       Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  State                     Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puerto Rico.............................  Camp Santiago..............  Multipurpose Machine Gun       $9,200,000
                                                                        Range.....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
                   REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED 
                   THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE 
                   ACCOUNT.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2014, for base 
     realignment and closure activities, including real property 
     acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized 
     by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part 
     A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) 
     and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure 
     Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended 
     by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601.

            Subtitle B--Prohibition on Additional BRAC Round

     SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE 
                   REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND.

       Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an 
     additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 2721. FORCE-STRUCTURE PLANS AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY 
                   AND ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY TO 
                   SUPPORT THE FORCE STRUCTURE.

       (a) Preparation and Submission of Force-structure Plans and 
     Infrastructure Inventory.--As part of the budget 
     justification documents submitted to Congress in support of 
     the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 
     2016, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following:
       (1) Two force-structure plans for each of the Army, Navy, 
     Air Force, and Marine Corps for the 20-year period beginning 
     with fiscal year 2016, including the probable end-strength 
     levels and major military force units (including land force 
     divisions, carrier and other major combatant vessels, air 
     wings, and other comparable units) needed to meet anticipated 
     threats, and the anticipated levels of funding that will be 
     available for national defense purposes during such period. 
     One force-structure plan shall reflect the 2014 Quadrennial 
     Defense Review and the other force-structure plan shall 
     reflect the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act 
     of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.), as amended by title I of the 
     Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-25) and section 
     101 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-67).
       (2) A comprehensive inventory of military installations 
     world-wide for each military department, with specifications 
     of the number and type of facilities in the active and 
     reserve forces of each military department.
       (b) Relationship of Plans and Inventory.--Using the force-
     structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall prepare (and 
     include as part of the submission of such plans and 
     inventory) the following:
       (1) A description of the infrastructure necessary to 
     support the force structure described in each force-structure 
     plan.
       (2) A discussion of categories of excess infrastructure and 
     infrastructure capacity, and the Secretary's targets for the 
     reduction of such excess capacity.
       (3) An assessment of the excess infrastructure and the 
     value of retaining certain excess infrastructure to support 
     surge or reversibility requirements.
       (4) An economic analysis of the effect of the closure or 
     realignment of military installations to reduce excess 
     infrastructure.
       (c) Special Considerations.--In determining the level of 
     necessary versus excess infrastructure under subsection (b), 
     the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following:
       (1) The anticipated continuing need for and availability of 
     military installations outside the United States, taking into 
     account current restrictions on the use of military 
     installations outside the United States and the potential for 
     future prohibitions or restrictions on the use of such 
     military installations.
       (2) Any efficiencies that may be gained from joint tenancy 
     by more than one branch of the Armed Forces at a military 
     installation or the reorganization or association of two or 
     more military installations as a single military 
     installation.
       (d) Certification of Need for Further Closures and 
     Realignments.--
       (1) Certification required.--On the basis of the force-
     structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under 
     subsection (a) and the descriptions and economic analysis 
     prepared under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall 
     include as part of the submission of the plans and inventory 
     a certification regarding whether the need exists for the 
     closure or realignment of additional military installations.
       (2) Additional certification.--As a condition on the 
     certification under paragraph (1) that the need for an 
     additional round of closures and realignments exists, the 
     Secretary shall include an additional certification that 
     every recommendation for the closure or realignment of 
     military installations in the additional round of closures 
     and realignments will result in annual net savings for each 
     of the military departments within six years after the 
     initiation of the additional round of closures and 
     realignments.
       (e) Comptroller General Evaluation.--
       (1) Evaluation required.--If the certifications are 
     provided under subsection (d), the Comptroller General of the 
     United States shall prepare an evaluation of the following:
       (A) The force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory 
     prepared under subsection (a), including an evaluation of the 
     accuracy and analytical sufficiency of the plans and 
     inventory.
       (B) The need for the closure or realignment of additional 
     military installations.
       (2) Submission.--The Comptroller General shall submit the 
     evaluation to Congress not later than 60 days after the date 
     on which the force-structure plans and infrastructure 
     inventory are submitted to Congress.

     SEC. 2722. MODIFICATION OF PROPERTY DISPOSAL PROCEDURES UNDER 
                   BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE PROCESS.

       (a) Report on Excess Property.--Section 2905 of the Defense 
     Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title 
     XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended 
     by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(f) Report on Designation of Property as Excess Instead 
     of Surplus.--(1) Not later than 180 days after the date on 
     which real property located at a military installation closed 
     or realigned under this part is declared excess, but not 
     surplus, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report identifying the 
     property and including the information required by paragraph 
     (2). The Secretary shall update the report every 180 days 
     thereafter until the property is either declared surplus or 
     transferred to another Federal agency.
       ``(2) Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the 
     following elements:
       ``(A) The reason for the excess designation.
       ``(B) The nature of the contemplated transfer.
       ``(C) The proposed timeline for the transfer.
       ``(D) Any impediments to completing the Federal agency 
     screening process.''.
       (b) Effect of Lack of Recognized Redevelopment Authority.--
     Section 2910(9) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
     Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 
     U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``The term'' and inserting ``(A) The 
     term''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(B) If no redevelopment authority referred to in 
     subparagraph (A) exists with respect to a military 
     installation, the term shall include the following:
       ``(i) The local government in whose jurisdiction the 
     military installation is wholly located.
       ``(ii) A local government agency or State government agency 
     designated by the chief executive officer of the State in 
     which the military installation is located under subparagraph 
     (B) of section 2905(b)(3) for the purpose of the consultation 
     required by subparagraph (A) of such section.''.

     SEC. 2723. FINAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS REGARDING CARETAKER 
                   AGREEMENT FOR FORMER DEFENSE DEPOT OGDEN, UTAH.

       (a) Settlement of Claims.--Subject to the condition imposed 
     by subsection (b), any claim by the United States against the 
     City of Ogden, Utah, and the Ogden Local Redevelopment 
     Authority (as the recognized redevelopment authority for 
     former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah, which was closed pursuant 
     to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part 
     A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)) 
     related to the terms or execution of the Caretaker Agreement 
     originally signed and dated September 10, 1997, between the 
     Department of the Army and the City of Ogden and the Ogden 
     Local Redevelopment Authority is hereby declared to be 
     settled, the City of Ogden and the Ogden Local Redevelopment 
     Authority have no remaining financial obligation to the 
     United States arising from that agreement, and the Defense 
     Contract Management Agency shall cease any collection efforts 
     with respect to any such claim.
       (b) Condition.--The operation of subsection (a) is 
     conditioned on release by the City of Ogden and the Ogden 
     Local Redevelopment Authority of any remaining financial 
     claim against the United States raising from the Caretaker 
     Agreement described in subsection (a).

[[Page 8668]]



         TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

 Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 
                                Changes

     SEC. 2801. PREVENTION OF CIRCUMVENTION OF MILITARY 
                   CONSTRUCTION LAWS.

       Subsection (a) of section 2802 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, the 
     Secretary concerned may carry out only such military 
     construction projects, land acquisitions, and defense access 
     road projects (as described under section 210 of title 23) as 
     are specifically authorized in a Military Construction 
     Authorization Act.''.

     SEC. 2802. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT UNSPECIFIED 
                   MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

       (a) Unspecified Minor Military Construction Project 
     Described.--Subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``$2,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$3,000,000''; and
       (2) by striking the second sentence.
       (b) Increased Threshold for Application of Secretory 
     Approval and Congressional Notification Requirements.--
     Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by striking 
     ``$750,000'' and inserting ``$1,000,000''.
       (c) Maximum Amount of Operation and Maintenance Funds 
     Authorized to Be Used for Projects.--Subsection (c) of such 
     section is amended by striking ``$750,000'' and inserting 
     ``$1,000,000''.
       (d) Annual Location Adjustment of Dollar Limitations.--Such 
     section is further amended by adding at the end the following 
     new subsection:
       ``(f) Adjustment of Dollar Limitations for Location.--Each 
     fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar 
     limitations specified in this section applicable to an 
     unspecified minor military construction project to reflect 
     the area construction cost index for military construction 
     projects published by the Department of Defense during the 
     prior fiscal year for the location of the project.''.

     SEC. 2803. USE OF ONE-STEP TURN-KEY CONTRACTOR SELECTION 
                   PROCEDURES FOR ADDITIONAL FACILITY PROJECTS.

       Section 2862 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 
     read as follows:

     ``Sec. 2862. Turn-key selection procedures

       ``(a) Authority to Use for Certain Purposes.--The Secretary 
     concerned may use one-step turn-key selection procedures for 
     the purpose of entering into a contract for any of the 
     following purposes:
       ``(1) The construction of an authorized military 
     construction project.
       ``(2) A repair project (as defined in section 2811(e) of 
     this title) with an approved cost equal to or less than 
     $4,000,000.
       ``(3) The construction of a facility as part of an 
     authorized security assistance activity.
       ``(b) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `one-step turn-key selection procedures' 
     means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on 
     the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, 
     in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price 
     contract, both the design and construction of a facility 
     using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary 
     concerned.
       ``(2) The term `security assistance activity' means--
       ``(A) humanitarian and civic assistance authorized by 
     sections 401 and 2561 of this title;
       ``(B) foreign disaster assistance authorized by section 404 
     of this title;
       ``(C) foreign military construction sales authorized by 
     section 29 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2769);
       ``(D) foreign assistance authorized under sections 607 and 
     632 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2357, 
     2392); and
       ``(E) other international security assistance specifically 
     authorized by law.''.

     SEC. 2804. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 
                   IN EUROPEAN COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY.

       Section 2809 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127 
     Stat. 1013) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``or the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015'' after 
     ``this division''; and
       (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``the date of the 
     enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``December 27, 2013''.

        Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

     SEC. 2811. CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT IN CONNECTION WITH 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MAJOR LAND ACQUISITIONS.

       Section 2664(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``No military department'';
       (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following new 
     paragraph:
       ``(2) If the real property acquisition is a major land 
     acquisition inside a State, the District of Columbia, the 
     Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
     Mariana Islands, or any territory or possession of the United 
     States, the Secretary concerned shall consult with the chief 
     executive officer of the State, the District of Columbia, the 
     Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
     Mariana Islands, or the territory or possession in which the 
     land is located to determine options for completing the real 
     property acquisition.'';
       (3) by striking ``The foregoing limitation'' and inserting 
     the following:
       ``(3) The limitations imposed by paragraphs (1) and (2)''; 
     and
       (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(4) In this subsection, the term `major land acquisition' 
     means any land acquisition not covered by the authority to 
     acquire low-cost interests in land under section 2663(c) of 
     this title.''.

     SEC. 2812. RENEWALS, EXTENSIONS, AND SUCCEEDING LEASES FOR 
                   FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OPERATING ON MILITARY 
                   INSTALLATIONS.

       Section 2667(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(4)(A) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a renewal, 
     extension, or succeeding lease by the Secretary concerned 
     with a financial institution selected in accordance with the 
     Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 
     providing for the selection of financial institutions to 
     operate on military installations if each of the following 
     applies:
       ``(i) The on-base financial institution was selected before 
     the date of the enactment of this paragraph or competitive 
     procedures are used for the selection of any new financial 
     institutions.
       ``(ii) A current and binding operating agreement is in 
     place between the installation commander and the selected on-
     base financial institution.
       ``(B) The renewal, extension, or succeeding lease shall 
     terminate upon the termination of the operating agreement 
     described in subparagraph (A)(ii) associated with that 
     lease.''.

     SEC. 2813. ARSENAL INSTALLATION REUTILIZATION AUTHORITY.

       Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (h), (i), and (j) as 
     subsections (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new 
     subsection (h):
       ``(h) Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority.--(1) In 
     the case of a military manufacturing arsenal, the Secretary 
     concerned shall delegate, subject to paragraph (2), the 
     authority provided by this section to the commander of the 
     military manufacturing arsenal or, if part of a larger 
     military installation, the installation commander for the 
     purpose of--
       ``(A) helping to maintain the viability of military 
     manufacturing arsenals and any installations on which they 
     are located;
       ``(B) eliminating, or at least reducing, the cost of 
     Government ownership of military manufacturing arsenals, 
     including the costs of operations and maintenance, the costs 
     of environmental remediation, and other costs; and
       ``(C) leveraging private investment at military 
     manufacturing arsenals through long-term facility use 
     contracts, property management contracts, leases, or other 
     agreements that support and advance the preceding purposes.
       ``(2) The authority delegated under paragraph (1) does not 
     include the authority to enter into a lease or contract under 
     this section to carry out any activity covered by section 
     4544(b) of this title related to sale of articles 
     manufactured by a military manufacturing arsenal or services 
     performed by a military manufacturing arsenal or the 
     performance of manufacturing work at the military 
     manufacturing arsenal.
       ``(3) Both leases and contracts are authorized under this 
     section for a military manufacturing arsenal, and, 
     notwithstanding subsection (b)(1), the term of the lease or 
     contract may be for up to 25 years if a lease or contract of 
     that duration will promote the national defense or be in the 
     public interest.
       ``(4) In this subsection, the term `military manufacturing 
     arsenal' means a Government-owned, Government-operated 
     defense plant of the Department of the Defense that 
     manufactures weapons, weapon components, or both.''.

     SEC. 2814. DEPOSIT OF REIMBURSED FUNDS TO COVER 
                   ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RELATING TO CERTAIN 
                   REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS.

       (a) Authority to Credit Reimbursed Funds to Accounts 
     Currently Available.--Section 2695(c) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking the first sentence and inserting the 
     following: ``(1) Amounts collected by the Secretary of a 
     military department under subsection (a) for administrative 
     expenses shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary--
       ``(A) to the appropriation, fund, or account from which the 
     expenses were paid; or
       ``(B) to an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account 
     currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for 
     which the expenses were paid.''; and
       (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Amounts so 
     credited'' and inserting the following:
       ``(2) Amounts credited under paragraph (1)''.
       (b) Prospective Applicability.--The amendments made by 
     subsection (a) shall not apply to administrative expenses 
     related to a real property transaction referred to in section 
     2695(b) of title 10, United States Code, that were covered by 
     the Secretary of a military department using amounts 
     appropriated to the Secretary before the date of the 
     enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 2815. SPECIAL EASEMENT ACQUISITION AUTHORITY, PACIFIC 
                   MISSILE RANGE FACILITY, BARKING SANDS, KAUAI, 
                   HAWAII.

       (a) Easement Acquisition Authority.--The Secretary of the 
     Navy may use the authority provided by sections 2664 and 
     2684a of title 10,

[[Page 8669]]

     United States Code, to enter into agreements with or acquire 
     from willing sellers easements and other interests in real 
     property in the vicinity of the Pacific Missile Range 
     Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii, for the purpose of--
       (1) limiting encroachments on military training, testing, 
     and operations at that installation; or
       (2) facilitating such training, testing, and operations.
       (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the acquisition of 
     an easement or other interest in real property under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy may not pay an 
     amount in excess of the fair market value of the interest to 
     be acquired.
       (c) Conditions on Use of Authority.--
       (1) No use of condemnation.--An easement or other interest 
     in real property may be acquired under subsection (a) only 
     from a willing seller.
       (2) No acquisition of complete title.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of the 
     Navy to use this section as authority to acquire all right, 
     title, and interest in and to real property in the vicinity 
     of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands.
       (d) Vicinity Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``vicinity'' means the area within 30 miles of the boundaries 
     of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands.

     SEC. 2816. NATIONAL SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS FOR INCLUSION OF 
                   FEDERAL PROPERTY ON NATIONAL REGISTER OF 
                   HISTORIC PLACES OR DESIGNATION AS NATIONAL 
                   HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER THE NATIONAL HISTORIC 
                   PRESERVATION ACT.

       Section 101(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act 
     (16 U.S.C. 470a(a)) is amended as follows:
       (1) In paragraph (2)--
       (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``; and'' and 
     inserting a semicolon;
       (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and 
     inserting ``; and''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(G) notifying the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
     United States House of Representatives and the Committee on 
     Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate if the property is 
     owned by the Federal Government when the property is being 
     considered for inclusion on the National Register, for 
     designation as a National Historic Landmark, or for 
     nomination to the World Heritage List.''.
       (2) By redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8) as paragraphs 
     (8) and (9), respectively.
       (3) By inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
       ``(7) If the head of the agency managing any Federal 
     property objects to such inclusion or designation for reasons 
     of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or 
     designation would have on use of the property for military 
     training or readiness purposes, that Federal property shall 
     be neither included on the National Register nor designated 
     as a National Historic Landmark until the objection is 
     withdrawn.''.
       (4) By adding after paragraph (9) (as so redesignated by 
     paragraph (2) of this section) the following:
       ``(10) The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to allow 
     for expedited removal of Federal property listed on the 
     National Register of Historic Places if the managing agency 
     of that Federal property submits to the Secretary a written 
     request to remove the Federal property from the National 
     Register of Historic Places for reasons of national security, 
     such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on 
     use of the property for military training or readiness 
     purposes.''.

  Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

     SEC. 2831. REPEAL OR MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON 
                   REALIGNMENT OF MARINE CORPS FORCES IN ASIA-
                   PACIFIC REGION.

       Section 2822 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127 
     Stat. 1016) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsections (a), (b), (c), and (e);
       (2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (f) as subsections 
     (b) and (c), respectively; and
       (3) by inserting before subsection (b), as redesignated, 
     the following new subsection (a):
       ``(a) Restriction on Development of Public 
     Infrastructure.--
       ``(1) Restriction.--If the Secretary of Defense determines 
     that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to 
     another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in 
     fiscal year 2015 under Federal programs administered by 
     agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in 
     the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, 
     conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or 
     construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary 
     of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, 
     cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such 
     grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental 
     funding directly supports an infrastructure project agreed 
     upon in the March 2011 Programmatic Agreement signed by the 
     Department of Defense, the Advisory Council on Historic 
     Preservation, the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer, 
     and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands State 
     Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the Military 
     Relocation to the Islands of Guam and Tinian.
       ``(2) Public infrastructure defined.--In this subsection, 
     term `public infrastructure' means any utility, method of 
     transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the 
     control of a public entity or State or local government that 
     is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general 
     public.''.

                      Subtitle D--Land Conveyances

     SEC. 2841. LAND CONVEYANCE, MT. SOLEDAD VETERANS MEMORIAL, LA 
                   JOLLA, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense may 
     convey, without consideration, to the Mount Soledad Memorial 
     Association, Inc. (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Association''), all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in 
     La Jolla, California, for the purpose of permitting the 
     Association to maintain the property for public purposes. 
     Upon conveyance of all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to the property under this subsection, 
     the United States severs all involvement with the property 
     and, notwithstanding the condition imposed by subsection (c), 
     does not retain a reversionary interest for the enforcement 
     of such condition.
       (b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     require the Association to cover costs (except costs for 
     environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by 
     the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs 
     incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under 
     subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for 
     environmental documentation, and any other administrative 
     costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 
     from the Association in advance of the Secretary incurring 
     the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs 
     actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 
     conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 
     the Association.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (c) Conditions on Conveyance.--The conveyance of the Mt. 
     Soledad Veterans Memorial under subsection (a) shall be 
     subject to the condition that a memorial shall be maintained 
     and used as a veterans memorial in perpetuity.
       (d) Description of Property.--The legal description of the 
     Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial is provided in section 2(d) of 
     Public Law 109-272 (120 Stat. 771; 16 U.S.C. 431 note).
       (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of 
     Defense may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.

     SEC. 2842. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER WALTER REED ARMY HOSPITAL, 
                   DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     convey, without consideration, to Children's Hospital, 
     nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the 
     District of Columbia with its principal place of business in 
     the District of Columbia (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Children's Hospital''), all right, title, and interest of 
     the United States in and to a parcel of real property at 
     former Walter Reed Army Hospital in the District of Columbia 
     consisting of approximately 13.25 acres and including 
     building 54 (The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Building 
     and former Military Medical Museum), building 53 (former post 
     theater), building 52 (warehouse and outpatient clinic), and 
     building 3 (attached parking structure) for the purpose of 
     permitting Children's Hospital to use the parcel for public-
     benefit purposes.
       (b) Condition on Use of Revenues.--If the property conveyed 
     under subsection (a) is used for a public-benefit purpose 
     that results in the generation of revenue for Children's 
     Hospital, Children's Hospital shall agree to use the 
     generated revenue only for medical research purposes by 
     depositing the revenues in fund designated for medical 
     research use.
       (c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
     require Children's Hospital to cover costs (except costs for 
     environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by 
     the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs 
     incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under 
     subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for 
     environmental documentation, and any other administrative 
     costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 
     from Children's Hospital in advance of the Secretary 
     incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds 
     the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 
     conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 
     Children's Hospital.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
     description of the property to

[[Page 8670]]

     be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a 
     survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.
       (e) Relation to Other Laws.--Section 2905(b) of the Defense 
     Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (title XXIX of 
     Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and section 2696 of 
     title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect to 
     the real property authorized for conveyance under subsection 
     (a).
       (f) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary of the Army 
     determines at any time that the real property conveyed under 
     subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the 
     purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a) or that 
     Children's Hospital has violated the condition on the use of 
     revenues imposed by subsection (b), all right, title, and 
     interest in and to such real property, including any 
     improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, 
     revert to and become the property of the United States, and 
     the United States shall have the right of immediate entry 
     onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary 
     under this subsection shall be made on the record after an 
     opportunity for a hearing.
       (g) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the 
     Army may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers 
     appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

     SEC. 2843. TRANSFERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, CAMP 
                   FRANK D. MERRILL AND LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA.

       (a) Transfers Required.--
       (1) Camp frank d. merrill.--Not later than September 30, 
     2015, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for 
     required Army force protection measures certain Federal land 
     administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest, 
     but permitted to the Secretary of the Army for Camp Frank D. 
     Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of approximately 
     282.304 acres identified in the permit numbered 0018-01.
       (2) Lake lanier property.--In exchange for the land 
     transferred under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Army 
     (acting through the Chief of Engineers) shall transfer to the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture 
     certain Federal land administered by the Army Corps of 
     Engineers and consisting of approximately 10 acres adjacent 
     to Lake Lanier at 372 Dunlap Landing Road, Gainesville, 
     Georgia.
       (b) Use of Transferred Land.--
       (1) Camp frank d. merrill.--Upon receipt of the land under 
     subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of the Army shall continue 
     to use the land for military purposes.
       (2) Lake lanier property.--Upon receipt of the land under 
     subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Agriculture shall use the 
     land for administrative purposes.
       (c) Protection of the Etowah Darter and Holiday Darter.--
     Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall 
     affect the prior designation of lands within the 
     Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the 
     Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter 
     (Etheostoma brevirostrum).
       (d) Legal Description and Map.--
       (1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the Army 
     and the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal 
     Register a legal description and map of both parcels of land 
     to be transferred under subsection (a).
       (2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed 
     under paragraph (1) for a parcel of land shall have the same 
     force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the 
     Secretaries may correct errors in the legal description and 
     map.
       (e) Reimbursements of Costs.--The transfers required by 
     subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except 
     that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary 
     of Agriculture for any costs incurred by the Secretary of 
     Agriculture to assist in the preparation of the legal 
     description and maps required by subsection (d).

     SEC. 2844. LAND CONVEYANCE, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, 
                   HAWAII.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may 
     convey, without consideration, to the Honolulu Authority for 
     Rapid Transportation (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Honolulu Authority''), all right, title, and interest of 
     the United States in and to a parcel of real property, 
     including any improvements thereon, consisting of 
     approximately 1.2 acres at or in the nearby vicinity of 
     Radford Drive and the Makalapa Gate of Joint Base Pearl 
     Harbor-Hickam, for the purpose of permitting the Honolulu 
     Authority to use the property for public purposes.
       (b) Condition on Use of Revenues.--If the property conveyed 
     under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such 
     subsection, for a public purpose that results in the 
     generation of revenue for the Honolulu Authority, the 
     Honolulu Authority shall agree to use the generated revenue 
     only for passenger rail transit purposes by depositing the 
     revenue in a fund designated for passenger rail transit use.
       (c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall 
     require the Honolulu Authority to cover costs to be incurred 
     by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such 
     costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance 
     under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for 
     environmental documentation, and any other administrative 
     costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 
     from the Honolulu Authority in advance of the Secretary 
     incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds 
     the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 
     conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 
     the Honolulu Authority.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
     description of the property to be conveyed under subsection 
     (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
     Secretary of the Navy.
       (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the 
     Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.

     SEC. 2845. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS ON LAND CONVEYANCE, 
                   JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT, ILLINOIS.

       Section 2922(c)(2) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (division B of Public 
     Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 605), as added by section 2842 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 
     (division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 863) is amended 
     in the second sentence, by striking ``23 years of operation'' 
     and inserting ``38 years of operation''.

     SEC. 2846. LAND CONVEYANCE, ROBERT H. DIETZ ARMY RESERVE 
                   CENTER, KINGSTON, NEW YORK.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     convey, without consideration, to the City of Kingston, New 
     York (in this section referred to as the ``City''), all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a 
     parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, 
     consisting of approximately 4 acres and containing the Robert 
     H. Dietz Army Reserve Center located at 144 Flatbush Avenue 
     in Kingston, New York, for the purpose of permitting the City 
     to use the parcel for public purposes.
       (b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary of the Army 
     determines at any time that the real property conveyed under 
     subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the 
     purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a), all 
     right, title, and interest in and to such real property, 
     including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of 
     the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the 
     United States, and the United States shall have the right of 
     immediate entry onto such real property. A determination by 
     the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the 
     record after an opportunity for a hearing.
       (c) Alternative Consideration Option.--
       (1) Fair market value.--In lieu of exercising the 
     reversionary interest under subsection (b) if the Secretary 
     of the Army determines that the conveyed property is not 
     being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance, 
     the Secretary may require the City to pay to the United 
     States an amount equal to the fair market value of the 
     property, as determined pursuant to paragraph (2).
       (2) Appraisal; adjustment.--The Secretary shall determine 
     the fair market value of the property through an appraisal 
     conducted by a licensed, independent appraiser acceptable to 
     the Secretary and the City. The fair market value of the 
     property shall be adjusted to exclude the value of any 
     improvements on the property constructed by the City.
       (d) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
     require the City to cover costs (except costs for 
     environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by 
     the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs 
     incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under 
     subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for 
     environmental documentation, and any other administrative 
     costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 
     from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the 
     actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs 
     actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 
     conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 
     the City.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the 
     Army may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.

     SEC. 2847. EXERCISE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, CAMP GRUBER, 
                   OKLAHOMA.

       (a) Business Case Analysis.--Not later than March 31, 2015, 
     the Secretary of the Army shall perform a business case 
     analysis to consider the merits of seeking, for use as 
     military maneuver

[[Page 8671]]

     space, the reversion of former Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, which--
       (1) consists of approximately 31,283.66 acres; and
       (2) was conveyed to the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife in 
     1948 subject to a reversionary clause that gives the United 
     States the right to reacquire the land if needed for national 
     defense purposes.
       (b) Exercise of Reversionary Right.--If, as a result of the 
     business case analysis required by subsection (a), the 
     Secretary of the Army determines that reacquisition of former 
     Camp Gruber is needed for national defense purposes, the 
     Secretary shall exercise the reversionary right and request 
     the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife to reconvey Camp Gruber 
     to the United States.
       (c) Conveyance to Oklahoma Military Department.--If Camp 
     Gruber is reacquired by the United States under subsection 
     (b), the Secretary of the Army shall convey, without 
     consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United 
     States in and to Camp Gruber to the Oklahoma Military 
     Department for the purpose of permitting the Oklahoma 
     Military Department to use Camp Gruber as military maneuver 
     space.
       (d) Consultation Requirement.--The Secretary of the Army 
     shall conduct the business case analysis required by 
     subsection (a) and make the determination under subsection 
     (b) in consultation with the Adjutant General of the Oklahoma 
     Military Department.
       (e) Structures and Improvements.--The reacquisition of Camp 
     Gruber under this section shall include the improvements, 
     structures, and fixtures located at Camp Gruber and related 
     personal property.
       (f) Costs.--
       (1) Costs of exercising reversion.--The Secretary of the 
     Army shall be responsible for all reasonable and necessary 
     costs associated with exercising the reversionary interest 
     under subsection (b) and reacquiring Camp Gruber, including 
     real estate transaction and environmental documentation 
     costs.
       (2) Costs of subsequent conveyance.--
       (A) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
     require the Oklahoma Military Department to cover costs to be 
     incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for 
     such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the 
     conveyance under subsection (c), including survey costs, 
     costs for environmental documentation, and any other 
     administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts 
     are collected from the Oklahoma Military Department in 
     advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the 
     amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the 
     Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall 
     refund the excess amount to the Oklahoma Military Department.
       (B) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under subparagraph (A) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (g) Prohibition on Use of Operation and Maintenance 
     Funds.--Notwithstanding subsection (f), the Secretary of the 
     Army may not use amounts appropriated for operation and 
     maintenance for the Army for the purpose of establishing, 
     reactivating, modernizing, or sustaining any portion of Camp 
     Gruber reacquired by the United States under subsection (b).
       (h) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the 
     Army may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance under subsection (c) as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.

     SEC. 2848. LAND CONVEYANCE, HANFORD SITE, WASHINGTON.

       (a) Conveyance Required.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than December 31, 2014, the 
     Secretary of Energy shall convey to the Community Reuse 
     Organization of the Hanford Site (in this section referred to 
     as the ``Organization'') all right, title, and interest of 
     the United States in and to two parcels of real property, 
     including any improvements thereon, consisting of 
     approximately 1,341 acres and 300 acres, respectively, of the 
     Hanford Reservation, as requested by the Organization on May 
     31, 2011, and October 13, 2011, and as depicted within the 
     proposed boundaries on the map titled ``Attachment 2-Revised 
     Map'' included in the October 13, 2011, letter.
       (2) Modification of conveyance.--Upon the agreement of the 
     Secretary and the Organization, the Secretary may adjust the 
     boundaries of one or both of the parcels specified for 
     conveyance under paragraph (1).
       (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance 
     under subsection (a), the Organization shall pay to the 
     United States an amount equal to the estimated fair market 
     value of the conveyed real property, as determined by the 
     Secretary of Energy, except that the Secretary may convey the 
     property without consideration or for consideration below the 
     estimated fair market value of the property if the 
     Organization--
       (1) agrees that the net proceeds from any sale or lease of 
     the property (or any portion thereof) received by the 
     Organization during at least the seven-year period beginning 
     on the date of such conveyance will be used to support the 
     economic redevelopment of, or related to, the Hanford Site; 
     and
       (2) executes the agreement for such conveyance and accepts 
     control of the real property within a reasonable time.
       (c) Expedited Notification to Congress.--Except as provided 
     in subsection (d)(2), the enactment of this section shall be 
     construed to satisfy any notice to Congress otherwise 
     required for the land conveyance required by this section.
       (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Energy may require such 
     additional terms and conditions in connection with the 
     conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary deems 
     necessary to protect the interests of the United States.
       (2) Congressional notification.--If the Secretary uses the 
     authority provided by paragraph (1) to impose a term or 
     condition on the conveyance, the Secretary shall submit to 
     Congress written notice of the term or condition and the 
     reason for imposing the term or condition.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

     SEC. 2861. MEMORIAL TO THE VICTIMS OF THE SHOOTING ATTACK AT 
                   THE WASHINGTON NAVY YARD.

       (a) Memorial Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may 
     establish on the grounds of the Washington Navy Yard in the 
     District of Columbia a memorial dedicated to the victims of 
     the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard that occurred 
     on September 16, 2013.
       (b) Establishment, Maintenance, and Repair.--The Secretary 
     of the Navy shall be responsible for the establishment, 
     maintenance, and repair of the memorial.
       (c) Acceptance of Contributions; Use.--
       (1) Acceptance of contributions.--The Secretary of the Navy 
     may solicit and accept monetary contributions and gifts of 
     property for the purpose of establishing, maintaining, and 
     repairing the memorial without regard to limitations 
     contained in section 2601 of title 10, United States Code.
       (2) Establishment of account.--There is established on the 
     books of the Treasury an account for the deposit of monetary 
     contributions received pursuant to paragraph (1).
       (3) Deposit and availability of contributions.--The 
     Secretary of the Navy shall deposit monetary contributions 
     accepted under paragraph (1) in the account. The funds in the 
     account shall be available to the Secretary, until expended 
     and without further appropriation, but only for the 
     establishment, maintenance, and repair of the memorial.

     SEC. 2862. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR 
                   SECURITY STUDIES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-
                   PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES.

       (a) Redesignation.--The Department of Defense regional 
     center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center 
     for Security Studies is hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye 
     Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
       (b) Conforming Amendments.--
       (1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies.--
     Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``Asia-Pacific Center for Security 
     Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific 
     Center for Security Studies''.
       (2) Acceptance of gifts and donations.--Section 
     2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking ``Asia-
     Pacific Center for Security Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel 
     K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
       (c) References.--Any reference to the Department of Defense 
     Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law, 
     regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 
     United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel 
     K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

     SEC. 2863. REDESIGNATION OF POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA IN HAWAII 
                   AS POHAKULOA TRAINING CENTER.

       (a) Redesignation.--The Pohakuloa Training Area in the 
     State of Hawaii is hereby renamed the ``Pohakuloa Training 
     Center''.
       (b) References.--Any reference to the Pohakuloa Training 
     Area in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 
     paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference 
     to the Pohakuloa Training Center.

     SEC. 2864. DESIGNATION OF DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS NATIONAL 
                   MEMORIAL IN RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The most reliable statistics regarding the number of 
     members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the 
     Distinguished Flying Cross indicate that 126,318 members of 
     the Armed Forces received the medal during World War II, 
     approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the 
     Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during 
     the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than 
     203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of 
     conflict.
       (2) The National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, 
     Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus many more recipients 
     of the Distinguished Flying Cross may be undocumented. 
     Currently, the Department of Defense continues to locate and 
     identify members of the Armed Forces who have received the 
     medal and are undocumented.
       (3) The United States currently lacks a national memorial 
     dedicated to the bravery and sacrifice of those members of 
     the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves by heroic 
     deeds performed in aerial flight.
       (4) An appropriate memorial to current and former members 
     of the Armed Forces is under construction at March Field Air 
     Museum in Riverside, California.
       (5) This memorial will honor all those members of the Armed 
     Forces who have distinguished

[[Page 8672]]

     themselves in aerial flight, whether documentation of such 
     members who earned the Distinguished Flying Cross exists or 
     not.
       (b) Designation.--The memorial to members of the Armed 
     Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, 
     located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, 
     is hereby designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross 
     National Memorial.
       (c) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial 
     designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park 
     System, and the designation of the national memorial shall 
     not be construed to require or permit Federal funds to be 
     expended for any purpose related to the national memorial.

     SEC. 2865. RENAMING SITE OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE 
                   NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, OHIO.

       Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
     Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended 
     by striking ``Aviation Center'' and inserting ``National 
     Museum''.

     SEC. 2866. MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

       (a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
       (1) to preserve and protect for the benefit of present and 
     future generations the nationally significant historic 
     resources associated with the Manhattan Project and which are 
     under the jurisdiction of the Department of Energy defense 
     environmental cleanup program under this title;
       (2) to improve public understanding of the Manhattan 
     Project and the legacy of the Manhattan Project through 
     interpretation of the historic resources associated with the 
     Manhattan Project;
       (3) to enhance public access to the Historical Park 
     consistent with protection of public safety, national 
     security, and other aspects of the mission of the Department 
     of Energy; and
       (4) to assist the Department of Energy, Historical Park 
     communities, historical societies, and other interested 
     organizations and individuals in efforts to preserve and 
     protect the historically significant resources associated 
     with the Manhattan Project.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Historical park.--The term ``Historical Park'' means 
     the Manhattan Project National Historical Park established 
     under subsection (c).
       (2) Manhattan project.--The term ``Manhattan Project'' 
     means the Federal military program to develop an atomic bomb 
     ending on December 31, 1946.
       (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
     of the Interior.
       (c) Establishment of Manhattan Project National Historical 
     Park.--
       (1) Establishment.--
       (A) Date.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this section, there shall be established as a 
     unit of the National Park System the Manhattan Project 
     National Historical Park.
       (B) Areas included.--The Historical Park shall consist of 
     facilities and areas listed under paragraph (2) as determined 
     by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of 
     Energy. The Secretary shall include the area referred to in 
     paragraph (2)(C)(i), the B Reactor National Historic 
     Landmark, in the Historical Park.
       (2) Eligible areas.--The Historical Park may only be 
     comprised of one or more of the following areas, or portions 
     of the areas, as generally depicted in the map titled 
     ``Manhattan Project National Historical Park Sites'', 
     numbered 540/108,834-C, and dated September 2012:
       (A) Oak ridge, tennessee.--Facilities, land, or interests 
     in land that are--
       (i) at Buildings 9204-3 and 9731 at the Department of 
     Energy Y-12 National Security Complex;
       (ii) at the X-10 Graphite Reactor at the Department of 
     Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory;
       (iii) at the K-25 Building site at the Department of Energy 
     East Tennessee Technology Park; and
       (iv) at the former Guest House located at 210 East Madison 
     Road.
       (B) Los alamos, new mexico.--Facilities, land, or interests 
     in land that are--
       (i) in the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory National 
     Historic Landmark District, or any addition to the Landmark 
     District proposed in the National Historic Landmark 
     Nomination--Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) NHL 
     District (Working Draft of NHL Revision), Los Alamos National 
     Laboratory document LA-UR 12-00387 (January 26, 2012);
       (ii) at the former East Cafeteria located at 1670 Nectar 
     Street; and
       (iii) at the former dormitory located at 1725 17th Street.
       (C) Hanford, washington.--Facilities, land, or interests in 
     land on the Department of Energy Hanford Nuclear Reservation 
     that are--
       (i) the B Reactor National Historic Landmark;
       (ii) the Hanford High School in the town of Hanford and 
     Hanford Construction Camp Historic District;
       (iii) the White Bluffs Bank building in the White Bluffs 
     Historic District;
       (iv) the warehouse at the Bruggemann's Agricultural 
     Complex;
       (v) the Hanford Irrigation District Pump House; and
       (vi) the T Plant (221-T Process Building).
       (3) Written consent of owner.--No non-Federal property may 
     be included in the Historical Park without the written 
     consent of the owner.
       (d) Agreement.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Secretary of 
     Energy (acting through the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and 
     Richland site offices) shall enter into an agreement 
     governing the respective roles of the Secretary and the 
     Secretary of Energy in administering the facilities, land, or 
     interests in land under the administrative jurisdiction of 
     the Department of Energy that is to be included in the 
     Historical Park under subsection (c)(2), including provisions 
     for enhanced public access, management, interpretation, and 
     historic preservation.
       (2) Responsibilities of the secretary.--Any agreement under 
     paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary shall--
       (A) have decisionmaking authority for the content of 
     historic interpretation of the Manhattan Project for purposes 
     of administering the Historical Park; and
       (B) ensure that the agreement provides an appropriate 
     advisory role for the National Park Service in preserving the 
     historic resources covered by the agreement.
       (3) Responsibilities of the secretary of energy.--Any 
     agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the 
     Secretary of Energy--
       (A) shall ensure that the agreement appropriately protects 
     public safety, national security, and other aspects of the 
     ongoing mission of the Department of Energy at the Oak Ridge 
     Reservation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Hanford 
     Site;
       (B) may consult with and provide historical information to 
     the Secretary concerning the Manhattan Project;
       (C) shall retain responsibility, in accordance with 
     applicable law, for any environmental remediation that may be 
     necessary in or around the facilities, land, or interests in 
     land governed by the agreement; and
       (D) shall retain authority and legal obligations for 
     historic preservation and general maintenance, including to 
     ensure safe access, in connection with the Department's 
     Manhattan Project resources.
       (4) Amendments.--The agreement under paragraph (1) may be 
     amended, including to add to the Historical Park facilities, 
     land, or interests in land within the eligible areas 
     described in subsection (c)(2) that are under the 
     jurisdiction of the Secretary of Energy.
       (e) Public Participation.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall consult with 
     interested State, county, and local officials, organizations, 
     and interested members of the public--
       (A) before executing any agreement under subsection (d); 
     and
       (B) in the development of the general management plan under 
     subsection (f)(2).
       (2) Notice of determination.--Not later than 30 days after 
     the date on which an agreement under subsection (d) is 
     entered into, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal 
     Register notice of the establishment of the Historical Park, 
     including an official boundary map.
       (3) Availability of map.--The official boundary map 
     published under paragraph (2) shall be on file and available 
     for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
     National Park Service. The map shall be updated to reflect 
     any additions to the Historical Park from eligible areas 
     described in subsection (c)(2).
       (4) Additions.--Any land, interest in land, or facility 
     within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) that 
     is acquired by the Secretary or included in an amendment to 
     the agreement under subsection (d)(4) shall be added to the 
     Historical Park.
       (f) Administration.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall administer the 
     Historical Park in accordance with--
       (A) this section; and
       (B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National 
     Park System, including--
       (i) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et 
     seq.); and
       (ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
       (2) General management plan.--Not later than 3 years after 
     the date on which funds are made available to carry out this 
     subsection, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the 
     Secretary of Energy, and in consultation and collaboration 
     with the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Richland Department of 
     Energy site offices, shall complete a general management plan 
     for the Historical Park in accordance with section 12(b) of 
     Public Law 91-383 (commonly known as the National Park 
     Service General Authorities Act; 16 U.S.C. 1a-7(b)).
       (3) Interpretive tours.--The Secretary may, subject to 
     applicable law, provide interpretive tours of historically 
     significant Manhattan Project sites and resources in the 
     States of Tennessee, New Mexico, and Washington that are 
     located outside the boundary of the Historical Park.
       (4) Land acquisition.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary may acquire land and 
     interests in land within the eligible areas described in 
     subsection (c)(2) by--
       (i) transfer of administrative jurisdiction from the 
     Department of Energy by agreement between the Secretary and 
     the Secretary of Energy;
       (ii) donation; or
       (iii) exchange.
       (B) No use of condemnation.--The Secretary may not acquire 
     by condemnation any land or interest in land under this 
     section or for the purposes of this section.
       (5) Donations; cooperative agreements.--
       (A) Federal facilities.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary may enter into one or more 
     agreements with the head of a Federal agency to provide 
     public access to, and management, interpretation, and 
     historic preservation of, historically significant Manhattan 
     Project resources under the jurisdiction or control of the 
     Federal agency.

[[Page 8673]]

       (ii) Donations; cooperative agreements.--The Secretary may 
     accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements 
     with, State governments, units of local government, tribal 
     governments, organizations, or individuals to further the 
     purpose of an interagency agreement entered into under clause 
     (i) or to provide visitor services and administrative 
     facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical 
     Park.
       (B) Technical assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
     technical assistance to State, local, or tribal governments, 
     organizations, or individuals for the management, 
     interpretation, and historic preservation of historically 
     significant Manhattan Project resources not included within 
     the Historical Park.
       (C) Donations to department of energy.--For the purposes of 
     this section, or for the purpose of preserving and providing 
     access to historically significant Manhattan Project 
     resources, the Secretary of Energy may accept, hold, 
     administer, and use gifts, bequests, and devises (including 
     labor and services).
       (g) Clarification.--
       (1) No buffer zone created.--Nothing in this section, the 
     establishment of the Historical Park, or the management plan 
     for the Historical Park shall be construed to create buffer 
     zones outside of the Historical Park. That an activity can be 
     seen and heard from within the Historical Park shall not 
     preclude the conduct of that activity or use outside the 
     Historical Park.
       (2) No cause of action.--Nothing in this section shall 
     constitute a cause of action with respect to activities 
     outside or adjacent to the established boundary of the 
     Historical Park.

    TITLE XXIX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT 
                         READINESS AND SECURITY

              Subtitle A--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

     SEC. 2901. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, NAVAL AIR 
                   STATION FALLON, NEVADA.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
     transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration, 
     the Federal land described in subsection (b).
       (b) Description of Federal Land.--The Federal land referred 
     to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres 
     of land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 
     Interior that--
       (1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill 
     County, Nevada; and
       (2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV-943-
     4214-10; N-37875).
       (c) Management.--On transfer of the Federal land described 
     under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the 
     Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdiction, custody, 
     and control of the Federal land.

     SEC. 2902. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 2903. WITHDRAWAL.

       Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land to be 
     transferred under section 2901 is withdrawn from all forms of 
     appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal 
     leasing laws, so long as the land remains under the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.

  Subtitle B--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, 
                               California

     SEC. 2911. REDESIGNATION OF JOHNSON VALLEY OFF-HIGHWAY 
                   VEHICLE RECREATION AREA, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Redesignation.--The Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle 
     Recreation Area in California is hereby redesignated as the 
     ``Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation 
     Area''.
       (b) Conforming Amendments.--Subtitle C of title XXIX of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 
     (division B of Public Law 113-66) is amended--
       (1) in section 2942(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1037), by striking 
     ``Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area''and 
     inserting ``Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle 
     Recreation Area''; and
       (2) in section 2945 (127 Stat. 1038)--
       (A) in the section heading, by inserting ``NATIONAL'' after 
     ``VALLEY'';
       (B) in subsection (a), by inserting ``National'' after 
     ``Valley'' in the matter preceding paragraph (1); and
       (C) in subsections (b), (c), and (d), by inserting 
     ``National'' after ``Valley'' each place it appears.
       (c) Relation to Authorized Navy Use.--The redesignation of 
     the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area as the 
     Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 
     does not alter or interfere with the rights and obligations 
     of the Navy regarding the use of portions of the Recreation 
     Area as provided in subtitle C of title XXIX of the Military 
     Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division 
     B of Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1034).
       (d) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, 
     document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to 
     the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area is 
     deemed to be a reference to the Johnson Valley National Off-
     Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.

    Subtitle C--Bureau of Land Management Withdrawn Military Lands 
                         Efficiency and Savings

     SEC. 2921. ELIMINATION OF TERMINATION DATE FOR PUBLIC LAND 
                   WITHDRAWALS AND RESERVATIONS UNDER MILITARY 
                   LANDS WITHDRAWAL ACT OF 1999.

       (a) Elimination of Termination Date.--Section 3015(a) of 
     the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of 
     Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 892) is amended by striking 
     ``shall'' the first place it appears and all that follows 
     through the period and inserting ``shall not terminate other 
     than by an election and determination of the Secretary of the 
     military department concerned or until such time as the 
     Secretary of the Interior can permanently transfer 
     administrative jurisdiction of the lands withdrawn and 
     reserved by this Act to the Secretary of the military 
     department concerned.''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3016 of the Military 
     Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106-65; 
     113 Stat. 893) is repealed.

      Subtitle D--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

     SEC. 2931. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND FOR 
                   NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Permanent Withdrawal and Reservation.--Section 2979 of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1047) is 
     amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 2979. PERMANENT WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.

       ``The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by 
     section 2971 shall not terminate, except pursuant to--
       ``(1) an election and determination by the Secretary of the 
     Navy to relinquish the land under section 2922; or
       ``(2) a transfer by the Secretary of the Interior of 
     permanent administrative jurisdiction over the land to the 
     Secretary of the Navy.''.
       (b) Withdrawal and Reservation of Additional Public Land.--
     Section 2971(b) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 1044) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``The public land'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) Initial withdrawal.--The public land''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) Additional withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing 
     rights, the public land (including interests in land) 
     referred to in subsection (a) also includes the approximately 
     26,313 acres of public land in San Bernardino County, 
     California, identified as `Proposed Navy Acquisition Area' 
     (but excluding the parcel identified as `AF Fee Simple') on 
     the map entitled `Cuddeback Land Area' and dated April 1, 
     2014, and filed in accordance with section 2912, except that 
     the withdrawal area specifically excludes any public land 
     included within the Grass Valley Wilderness and all private 
     lands otherwise located within the boundaries of the 
     withdrawal area. The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that 
     the owners of the excluded private land continue to have 
     reasonable access to their private land.''.
       (c) Management of Additional Public Land.--Section 2973 of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1045) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) Additional Management Considerations for Certain 
     Lands.--Subject to existing laws and to the extent possible 
     without compromising mission readiness, the Secretary of the 
     Navy shall manage the additional lands withdrawn by section 
     2971(b)(2) to protect existing historic, economic, cultural, 
     recreational, hunting, and scientific features and uses, 
     including access to existing roadways and trails.''.

           Subtitle E--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

     SEC. 2941. ADDITIONAL WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC 
                   LAND TO SUPPORT WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW 
                   MEXICO.

       Section 2951(b) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 
     127 Stat. 1039) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``The Federal land'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) Initial withdrawal.--The Federal land''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) Northern extension area.--The Federal land referred 
     to in subsection (a) also includes the Federal land under the 
     jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management located beneath 
     the boundaries of the Special Use Airspace Areas designated 
     as R-5107C and R-5107H for White Sands Missile Range, New 
     Mexico, as described in Federal Aviation Administration Order 
     JO 7400.8W dated February 16, 2014.''.

[[Page 8674]]



 DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND 
                          OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

      TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

         Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

     SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for 
     fiscal year 2015 for the activities of the National Nuclear 
     Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified 
     in the funding table in section 4701.
       (b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds 
     referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying 
     out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new 
     plant projects for the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration as follows:
       Project 15-D-613, Emergency Operations Center, Y-12 
     National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, $2,000,000.
       Project 15-D-612, Emergency Operations Center, Lawrence 
     Livermore National Laboratory, California, $2,000,000.
       Project 15-D-611, Emergency Operations Center, Sandia 
     National Laboratories, New Mexico, $4,000,000.
       Project 15-D-302, TA-55 Reinvestment Project Phase III, Los 
     Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 
     $16,062,000.
       Project 15-D-301, High Explosive Science and Engineering 
     Facility, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas, $11,800,000.
       Project 15-D-904, NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3, Naval 
     Reactors Facility, Idaho, $400,000.
       Project 15-D-903, KL Fire System Upgrade, Knolls Atomic 
     Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, $600,000.
       Project 15-D-902, KS Engineroom Team Trainer Facility, 
     Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York, $1,500,000.
       Project 15-D-901, KS Central Office and Prototype Staff 
     Building, Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York, 
     $24,000,000.

     SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for 
     fiscal year 2015 for defense environmental cleanup activities 
     in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4701.
       (b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds 
     referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying 
     out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, 
     for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following 
     new plant projects:
       Project 15-D-401, KW Basin Sludge Removal Project, Hanford, 
     Washington, $26,290,000.
        Project 15-D-402, Saltstone Disposal Unit #6, Savannah 
     River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, $34,642,000.
       Project 15-D-405, Sludge Processing Facility Build Out, Oak 
     Ridge, Tennessee, $4,200,000.
        Project 15-D-406, Hexavalent Chromium Pump and Treatment 
     Remedy Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 
     New Mexico, $28,600,000.
        Project 15-D-409, Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, 
     Hanford, Washington, $23,000,000.

     SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
     Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for other defense 
     activities in carrying out programs as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4701.

     SEC. 3104. ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
     Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for energy security 
     and assurance programs necessary for national security as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4701.

   Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

     SEC. 3111. DESIGN AND USE OF PROTOTYPES OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
                   FOR INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES.

       (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 4509 of the 
     Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2660) is amended to read 
     as follows:
       ``(a) Prototypes.--(1) Not later than the date on which the 
     President submits to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, 
     United States Code, the budget for fiscal year 2016, the 
     directors of the national security laboratories shall jointly 
     develop a multiyear plan to design and build prototypes of 
     nuclear weapons to further intelligence estimates with 
     respect to foreign nuclear weapons activities and 
     capabilities.
       ``(2) Not later than the date on which the President 
     submits to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United 
     States Code, the budget for an even-numbered fiscal year 
     occurring after fiscal year 2017, the directors shall jointly 
     develop an update to the plan developed under paragraph (1).
       ``(3)(A) The directors shall jointly submit to the 
     Secretary of Energy the plan and each update developed under 
     paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.
       ``(B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the 
     directors submit the plan and each update under subparagraph 
     (A), the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees such plan and each such 
     update, without change.
       ``(4)(A) The Secretary, in coordination with the directors 
     of the nuclear weapons laboratories, shall carry out the plan 
     developed under paragraph (1), including the updates to the 
     plan developed under paragraph (2).
       ``(B) The Secretary may determine the manner in which the 
     designing and building of prototypes of nuclear weapons is 
     carried out under such plan.
       ``(C) The Secretary shall promptly submit to the 
     congressional defense committees written notification of any 
     changes the Secretary makes to such plan pursuant to 
     subparagraph (B), including justifications for such 
     changes.''.
       (b) Matters Included.--Such section is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(b) Matters Included.--(1) The directors shall ensure 
     that the plan developed and updated under subsection (a) 
     provides increased information upon which to base 
     intelligence assessments and emphasizes the competencies of 
     the national security laboratories with respect to designing 
     and building prototypes of nuclear weapons.
       ``(2) To carry out paragraph (1), the plan developed and 
     updated under subsection (a) shall include the following:
       ``(A) Design and system engineering activities of full-
     scale engineering prototypes (using surrogate special nuclear 
     materials), including weaponization features as required.
       ``(B) Design, system engineering, and experimental testing 
     (using surrogate special nuclear materials) of above-ground 
     experiment test hardware.
       ``(C) Design and system engineering of scaled or 
     subcomponent experimental test articles (using special 
     nuclear materials) for conducting experiments at the Nevada 
     National Security Site.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (c) of such section, 
     as redesignated by subsection (b), is amended by striking 
     ``subsection (a), the Administrator'' and inserting ``this 
     section, the Secretary''.

     SEC. 3112. AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL LEVELS OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR 
                   SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) Full-time Equivalent Personnel Levels.--Subsection (a) 
     of section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) by striking ``2014'' and inserting ``2015''; and
       (B) by striking ``1,825'' and inserting ``1,650''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2016''; and
       (B) by striking ``1,825'' and inserting ``1,650''.
       (b) Definition.--Such section is further amended by adding 
     at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(e) Office of the Administrator Employees.--In this 
     section, the term `Office of the Administrator', with respect 
     to the employees of the Administration, includes employees 
     whose funding is derived from an account of the 
     Administration titled `Federal Salaries and Expenses'.''.

     SEC. 3113. COST CONTAINMENT FOR URANIUM CAPABILITIES 
                   REPLACEMENT PROJECT.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the April 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, a February 2011 
     letter from the President to the Senate, and many other 
     policy statements and documents have identified the Uranium 
     Capabilities Replacement Project as a critical nuclear 
     modernization priority;
       (2) the failure of the Department of Energy and the 
     National Nuclear Security Administration to successfully and 
     efficiently execute and oversee the Uranium Capabilities 
     Replacement Project undermines national security and 
     jeopardizes the long-term credibility of the nuclear 
     deterrent;
       (3) the April 8, 2014, testimony of the Acting 
     Administrator for Nuclear Security that ``close to half'' of 
     the $1,200,000,000 taxpayers have spent on the design of such 
     project has been wasted is a grievous misuse of limited 
     taxpayer funds, and the appropriate officials of the Federal 
     Government and contractors must be held accountable;
       (4) the uranium capabilities and modern infrastructure that 
     are to be provided by all three phases of the Uranium 
     Capabilities Replacement Project are critical to national 
     security and Congress fully supports efforts to deliver all 
     of these capabilities efficiently and expeditiously;
       (5) focused attention and robust leadership from the 
     highest levels of the executive branch and Congress are 
     required to ensure that such project delivers such critical 
     national security capabilities; and
       (6) the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator for 
     Nuclear Security must ensure that lines of responsibility, 
     authority, and accountability for such project are clear 
     going forward.
       (b) Cost and Oversight of Project.--Section 3123 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2178), as amended by section 
     3126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1063), is amended--
       (1) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows:
       ``(d) Cost of Phase I.--
       ``(1) Limitation.--The total cost of Phase I under 
     subsection (a) of the project referred to in such subsection 
     may not exceed $4,200,000,000.
       ``(2) Adjustment.--If the Secretary determines the total 
     cost of Phase I will exceed the

[[Page 8675]]

     amount set forth in paragraph (1), the Secretary may adjust 
     such amount if, by not later than March 1, 2015, the 
     Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a 
     detailed justification for such adjustment, including--
       ``(A) the amount of the adjustment and the proposed total 
     cost of Phase I;
       ``(B) a detailed justification for such adjustment, 
     including a description of the changes that would be required 
     to the project referred to in subsection (a) if Phase I were 
     to not exceed the total cost set forth in paragraph (1);
       ``(C) a detailed description of the actions taken to hold 
     appropriate contractors, employees of contractors, and 
     employees of the Federal Government accountable for the 
     repeated failures within the project;
       ``(D) a description of the clear lines of responsibility, 
     authority, and accountability for the project as the project 
     continues, including descriptions of the roles and 
     responsibilities for each key Federal and contractor 
     position; and
       ``(E) a detailed description of the structural reforms 
     planned or implemented by the Secretary to ensure Phase I is 
     executed on time and on schedule.
       ``(3) Annual certification.--Not later than March 1 of each 
     year through 2025, the Secretary shall certify in writing to 
     the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of 
     Defense that Phase I under subsection (a) of the project 
     referred to in such subsection will meet--
       ``(A) the total cost set forth in paragraph (1) (as 
     adjusted pursuant to paragraph (2) if so adjusted); and
       ``(B) a schedule that enables, by not later than 2025--
       ``(i) uranium operations in building 9212 to cease; and
       ``(ii) uranium operations in a new facility constructed 
     under such project to begin.
       ``(4) Report.--If the Secretary of Energy does not make a 
     certification by March 1 of any year in which a certification 
     is required under paragraph (3), by not later than May 1 of 
     such year, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report that 
     identifies the resources of the Department of Energy that the 
     Chairman determines should be redirected to enable the 
     Department of Energy to meet the total cost and schedule 
     described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of such paragraph.'';
       (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(3) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary 
     of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a report detailing 
     the implementation of paragraphs (1) and (2), including--
       ``(A) a description of the program management, oversight, 
     design, and other responsibilities for the project referred 
     to in subsection (a) that are provided to the Commander of 
     the Naval Facilities Engineering Command pursuant to 
     paragraph (1); and
       ``(B) a description of the funding used by the Secretary 
     under paragraph (2) to carry out paragraph (1).''; and
       (3) by striking subsections (g) and (h).

     SEC. 3114. PLUTONIUM PIT PRODUCTION CAPACITY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) In 2008, the Department of Defense and the Department 
     of Energy, acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council 
     established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, 
     agreed on a strategy to balance cost, risk, and stockpile 
     needs and established the requirement for the Department of 
     Energy to produce 50 to 80 plutonium pits per year.
       (2) In a memorandum of agreement dated May 3, 2010, entered 
     into by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, 
     the Secretaries agreed that the Department of Energy would 
     achieve a minimum pit production capacity of 50 to 80 pits 
     per year by 2022.
       (3) The current plans of the Secretary of Energy would 
     achieve a pit production capacity of 50 to 80 pits per year 
     by 2031, resulting in a delay of nearly a decade as compared 
     to the agreement described in paragraph (2).
       (4) In a report dated January 14, 2014, that the Secretary 
     of Defense submitted to Congress, the Secretary stated that 
     ``the Department of Defense has revalidated its requirement 
     for 50 - 80 pits per year based on the demands of stockpile 
     modernization, the commitments to a modern physical 
     infrastructure, and the ability to hedge against technical 
     failure or geopolitical risk.''.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the requirement to create a modern, responsive nuclear 
     infrastructure that includes the capability and capacity to 
     produce, at minimum, 50 to 80 pits per year, is a national 
     security priority;
       (2) delaying creation of a modern, responsive nuclear 
     infrastructure until the 2030s is an unacceptable risk to the 
     nuclear deterrent and the national security of the United 
     States; and
       (3) timelines for creating certain capacities for 
     production of plutonium pits and other nuclear weapons 
     components must be driven by the requirement to hedge against 
     technical and geopolitical risk and not solely by the needs 
     of life extension programs.
       (c) Pit Production.--
       (1) In general.--Title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by inserting after 
     the item relating to section 4218 the following new section:

     ``SEC. 4219. PLUTONIUM PIT PRODUCTION CAPACITY.

       ``(a) Requirement.--Consistent with the requirements of the 
     Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure 
     that the nuclear security enterprise--
       ``(1) during 2023, produces not less than 30 war reserve 
     plutonium pits;
       ``(2) during 2026, produces not less than 50 war reserve 
     plutonium pits; and
       ``(3) during a pilot period of not less than 90 days during 
     2027, demonstrates the capability to produce war reserve 
     plutonium pits at a rate sufficient to produce 80 pits per 
     year.
       ``(b) Annual Certification.--Not later than March 1, 2015, 
     and each year thereafter through 2027, the Secretary shall 
     certify to the congressional defense committees and the 
     Secretary of Defense that the programs and budget of the 
     Secretary will enable the nuclear security enterprise to meet 
     the requirements under subsection (a).
       ``(c) Plan.--If the Secretary does not make a certification 
     by March 1 of any year in which a certification is required 
     under subsection (b), by not later than May 1 of such year, 
     the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees a plan to enable the 
     nuclear security enterprise to meet the requirements under 
     subsection (b). Such plan shall include identification of the 
     resources of the Department of Energy that the Chairman 
     determines should be redirected to support the plan to meet 
     such requirements.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents for the 
     Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 4218 the following new item:
       ``Sec. 4219. Plutonium pit production capacity.''.

     SEC. 3115. DEFINITION OF BASELINE AND THRESHOLD FOR STOCKPILE 
                   LIFE EXTENSION PROJECT.

       Section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
     2753) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by adding after the period the 
     following new sentence: ``In addition to the requirement 
     under subparagraph (B), the cost and schedule baseline of a 
     nuclear stockpile life extension project established under 
     this subparagraph shall be the cost and schedule as 
     determined by the weapon design and cost report required 
     prior to the project entering into the development 
     engineering phase.''; and
       (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``200'' and inserting 
     ``150''.

     SEC. 3116. PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR WARHEAD FOR LONG-RANGE 
                   STANDOFF WEAPON.

       (a) First Production Unit.--The Secretary of Energy shall 
     deliver a first production unit for a nuclear warhead for the 
     long-range standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 
     2025.
       (b) Plan.--
       (1) Development.--The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary 
     of Defense shall jointly develop a plan to carry out 
     subsection (a).
       (2) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly 
     submit to the congressional defense committees the plan 
     developed under paragraph (1).
       (c) Notification and Assessment.--
       (1) Notification.--If at any time the Secretary of Energy 
     determines that the Secretary will not deliver a first 
     production unit for a nuclear warhead for the long-range 
     standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 2025, the 
     Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees, 
     the Secretary of Defense, and the Commander of the United 
     States Strategic Command of such determination, including an 
     explanation for why the delivery will be delayed.
       (2) Assessment.--If the Secretary of Energy makes a 
     notification under paragraph (1), the Commander of the United 
     States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees an assessment of the delay described in 
     the notification, including--
       (A) the effects of such delay to national security and 
     nuclear deterrence and assurance; and
       (B) any mitigation options available.
       (d) Briefing.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Commander of the United States 
     Strategic Command, shall provide to the congressional defense 
     committees a briefing on the justification of the long-range 
     standoff weapon, including--
       (1) why such weapon is needed, including any potential 
     redundancies with existing weapons;
       (2) the cost of such weapon; and
       (3) what warhead, existing or otherwise, is planned to be 
     used for such weapon.

     SEC. 3117. DISPOSITION OF WEAPONS-USABLE PLUTONIUM.

       (a) Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility.--
       (1) In general.--Of the funds described in paragraph (2), 
     the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and 
     program support activities relating to the MOX facility.
       (2) Funds described.--The funds described in this paragraph 
     are the following:
       (A) Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the 
     National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility 
     for construction and program support activities.
       (B) Funds authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year 
     prior to fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration for the MOX facility for construction and 
     program support activities that are unobligated as of the 
     date of the enactment of this Act.
       (b) Study.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall seek to enter 
     into a contract with a

[[Page 8676]]

     federally funded research and development center to conduct a 
     study to assess and validate the analysis of the Secretary of 
     Energy with respect to surplus weapon-grade plutonium 
     options.
       (2) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and 
     development center conducting the study under paragraph (1) 
     shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any 
     findings and recommendations.
       (c) Report.--
       (1) Plan.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the study 
     conducted under subsection (b)(1).
       (2) Elements included.--The report under paragraph (1) 
     shall include the following:
       (A) The study conducted by the federally funded research 
     and development center under subsection (b)(1), without 
     change.
       (B) Identification of the alternatives to the MOX facility 
     considered by the Secretary, including a life-cycle cost 
     analysis for each such alternative.
       (C) Identification of the portions of such life cycle cost 
     analyses that are common to all such alternatives.
       (D) Discussion on continuation of the MOX facility, 
     including a future funding profile or a detailed discussion 
     of selected alternatives determined appropriate by the 
     Secretary for such discussion.
       (E) Discussion of the issues regarding implementation of 
     such selected alternatives, including all regulatory and 
     public acceptance issues, including interactions with 
     affected States.
       (F) Explanation of how the alternatives to the MOX facility 
     conform with the Plutonium Disposition Agreement, and if an 
     alternative does not so conform, what measures must be taken 
     to ensure conformance.
       (G) Identification of steps the Secretary would have to 
     take to close out all MOX facility related activities, as 
     well as the associated cost.
       (H) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``MOX facility'' means the mixed-oxide fuel 
     fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South 
     Carolina.
       (2) The term ``Plutonium Disposition Agreement'' means the 
     Agreement Between the Government of the United States of 
     America and the Government of the Russian Federation 
     Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium 
     Designated As No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and 
     Related Cooperation, as amended.
       (3) The term ``program support activities'' means 
     activities that support the design, long-lead equipment 
     procurement, and site preparation of the MOX facility.

     SEC. 3118. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF 
                   THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY.

       (a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     for fiscal year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the 
     Office of the Administrator as specified in the funding table 
     in section 4701, or otherwise made available for that Office 
     for that fiscal year, not more than 75 percent may be 
     obligated or expended until--
       (1) the President transmits to Congress the matters 
     required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 
     4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
     2525(f)(2));
       (2) the President transmits to the congressional defense 
     committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 
     and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives the matters--
       (A) required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 
     1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1576); and
       (B) with respect to which the Secretary of Energy is 
     responsible;
       (3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense 
     committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 
     and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives the report required to be submitted during 
     2015 under section 3122(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1710); and
       (4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the 
     congressional defense committees the detailed report on the 
     stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan 
     required to be submitted during 2015 under section 4203(b)(2) 
     of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)).
       (b) Office of the Administrator Defined.--In this section, 
     the term ``Office of the Administrator'', with respect to 
     accounts of the National Nuclear Security Administration, 
     includes any account from which funds are derived for 
     ``Federal Salaries and Expenses''.

     SEC. 3119. ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
                   OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR 
                   SECURITY.

       (a) Limitation.--In addition to the limitation in section 
     3118, of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the 
     Administrator as specified in the funding table in section 
     4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that 
     fiscal year, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or 
     expended until the date on which the Administrator for 
     Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense 
     committees a report on the efficiencies proposed by the study 
     titled ``2012 Joint DOE/DoD Study on Potential NNSA 
     Management and Work Force Prioritization Efficiencies'' 
     conducted jointly by the Administrator and the Director of 
     Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. Such report shall 
     include details on how the Administrator will carry out 
     during fiscal year 2015 each efficiency measure proposed by 
     such joint study.
       (b) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the Nuclear 
     Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, 
     United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report that includes the following:
       (1) The efficiencies that the Council recommends the 
     Administrator to carry out during fiscal year 2016.
       (2) An assessment by the Council of--
       (A) the report submitted by the Administrator under 
     subsection (a)(1) of section 3123 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1711);
       (B) the report submitted by the Comptroller General of the 
     United States under subsection (b) of such section; and
       (C) each of the matters described in subparagraphs (A) 
     through (E) of subsection (a)(2) of such section.
       (c) Office of the Administrator Defined.--In this section, 
     the term ``Office of the Administrator'', with respect to 
     accounts of the National Nuclear Security Administration, 
     includes any account from which funds are derived for 
     ``Federal Salaries and Expenses''.

     SEC. 3120. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
                   NONPROLIFERATION ACTIVITIES BETWEEN THE UNITED 
                   STATES AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration may be used for any contact, cooperation, or 
     transfer of technology between the United States and the 
     Russian Federation until the Secretary of Energy, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 
     Defense, certifies to the appropriate congressional 
     committees that--
       (1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no 
     longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
       (2) the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of 
     all Ukrainian territory;
       (3) the Russian Federation is no longer acting 
     inconsistently with the INF Treaty; and
       (4) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE 
     Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of 
     its treaty obligations.
       (b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Energy may waive the 
     limitation in subsection (a) if--
       (1) the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the 
     Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, submits to 
     the appropriate congressional committees--
       (A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national 
     security interests of the United States and a description of 
     the national security interests covered by the waiver; and
       (B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Energy cannot 
     make a certification for such under subsection (a); and
       (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the Secretary submits the information in the report 
     under paragraph (1)(B).
       (c) Exception for Certain Military Bases.--The 
     certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of 
     subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the 
     Russian Federation in Ukraine's Crimean peninsula operating 
     in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and 
     Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory 
     of Ukraine.
       (d) Application.--The limitation in subsection (a) applies 
     with respect to funds described in such subsection that are 
     unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
     the following:
       (A) The congressional defense committees.
       (B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (2) The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty on 
     Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 
     19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
       (3) The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty Between the 
     United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist 
     Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and 
     Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the 
     Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at 
     Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 
     1988.

     SEC. 3121. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSE 
                   NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ACTIVITIES AT SITES IN 
                   THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 for defense nuclear nonproliferation 
     activities may be obligated or expended for such activities 
     at sites in the Russian Federation until a period of 30 days 
     has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of 
     Energy certifies to the appropriate congressional committees 
     that such sites are not actively engaged in Russian nuclear 
     weapons, intelligence, or defense activities.
       (b) Waiver.--The President, without delegation, may waive 
     the limitation in subsection (a) if a period of 30 days has 
     elapsed following the date on which the President submits to 
     the appropriate congressional committees--
       (1) notification that such a waiver is in the national 
     security interest of the United States; and
       (2) certification that none of the funds described in 
     subsection (a) will be contributed to the nuclear weapons 
     program of Russia.

[[Page 8677]]

       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means the following:
       (1) The congressional defense committees.
       (2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

                     Subtitle C--Plans and Reports

     SEC. 3131. COST ESTIMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION BY NATIONAL 
                   NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

       Section 3221(h) of the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2411) is amended by adding at 
     the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) Administration.--The term `Administration', with 
     respect to any authority, duty, or responsibility provided by 
     this section, does not include the Office of Naval 
     Reactors.''.

     SEC. 3132. ANALYSIS AND REPORT ON W88 ALT 370 PROGRAM HIGH 
                   EXPLOSIVES OPTIONS.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, the 
     Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the Chairman of the 
     Nuclear Weapons Council shall jointly submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the W88 Alt 370 
     program that contains analyses of the costs, benefits, risks, 
     and feasibility of each of the following options:
       (1) Incorporating a refresh of the conventional high 
     explosives of the W88 warhead as part of such program.
       (2) Not incorporating such a refresh as part of such 
     program.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include, for each option described in paragraphs (1) 
     and (2) of subsection (a), an analysis of the following:
       (1) Near-term and lifecycle cost estimates, including costs 
     to both the Navy and the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration.
       (2) Potential cost avoidance.
       (3) Operational effects to the Navy and to the capacity and 
     throughput of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in 
     section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
     2501) of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
       (4) The expected longevity of the W88 warhead.
       (5) Near-term and long-term safety and security risks and 
     potential risk-mitigation measures.
       (6) Any other matters the Secretary, the Administrator, or 
     the Chairman considers appropriate.

     SEC. 3133. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FACILITIES.

       (a) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     containing an analysis of using or modifying existing 
     facilities across the nuclear security enterprise (as defined 
     in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
     2501)) to support the plutonium strategy of the National 
     Nuclear Security Administration.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) An analysis of the costs, benefits, cost-savings, 
     risks, and effects of using or modifying existing facilities 
     of the nuclear security enterprise as compared to the current 
     plan of the Administrator for supporting the plutonium 
     strategy of the Administration, including all phases of the 
     plan.
       (2) Such other matters as the Administrator determines 
     appropriate.

                       Subtitle D--Other Matters

     SEC. 3141. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE 
                   ACT.

       (a) Definitions.--Section 4002(3) of the Atomic Energy 
     Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(3)) is amended by striking 
     ``Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 
     401 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 
     U.S.C. 435 note),'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 12333 
     of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 3001 note), Executive Order 
     No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note), Executive 
     Order No. 13526 of December 29, 2009 (50 U.S.C. 3161 
     note),''.
       (b) Management Structure.--Section 4102(b)(3) of such Act 
     (50 U.S.C. 2512(b)(3)) is amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
     ``for improving the'';
       (2) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``for improving the'' 
     before ``governance''; and
       (3) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``relating to'' 
     before ``any other''.
       (c) Stockpile Stewardship.--Section 4203(d)(4)(A)(i) of 
     such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(d)(4)(A)(i)) is amended by striking 
     ``50 U.S.C. 404a'' and inserting ``50 U.S.C. 3043''.
       (d) Reports on Stockpile.--Section 4205(b)(2) of such Act 
     (50 U.S.C. 2525(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``commander'' 
     and inserting ``Commander''.
       (e) Advice on Reliability of Stockpile.--Section 4218 of 
     such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``commander'' and 
     inserting ``Commander''; and
       (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``representatives'' 
     and inserting ``a representative''.
       (f) Disposition of Certain Plutonium.--Section 4306 of such 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2566) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(6)(C), by striking ``paragraph (A)'' 
     and inserting ``subparagraph (A)'';
       (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``2002'' and 
     inserting ``2002,''; and
       (3) in subsection (d)(3), by inserting ``of Energy'' after 
     ``Department''.
       (g) Limitation on Use of Funds in Relation to F-Canyon 
     Facility.--Section 4454 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2638) is 
     amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting ``of'' after 
     ``assessment''.
       (h) Inspections of Certain Facilities.--Section 4501(a) of 
     such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking ``nuclear 
     weapons facility'' and inserting ``national security 
     laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility''.
       (i) Notice Relating to Certain Failures.--Section 4505 of 
     such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b), by striking the subsection heading 
     and inserting the following: ``Significant Atomic Energy 
     Defense Intelligence Losses''; and
       (2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ``50 U.S.C. 413'' and 
     inserting ``50 U.S.C. 3091''.
       (j) Review of Certain Documents Before Declassification and 
     Release.--Section 4521(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671(b)) is 
     amended by striking ``Executive Order 12958'' and inserting 
     ``Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)''.
       (k) Protection Against Release of Restricted Data.--Section 
     4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Executive Order No. 
     12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note)'' and inserting ``Executive Order 
     No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)'';
       (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``Executive Order No. 
     12958'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 13526'';
       (3) in subsection (f)(2), by striking ``Executive Order No. 
     12958'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 13526''.
       (l) Identification of Declassification Activities in Budget 
     Materials.--Section 4525(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675(a)) 
     is amended by striking ``Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 
     435 note)'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 13526 (50 
     U.S.C. 3161 note)''.
       (m) Workforce Restructuring Plan.--Section 4604(f)(3) of 
     such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704(f)(3)) is amended by striking 
     ``Nevada and'' and inserting ``Nevada, and''.
       (n) Availability of Funds.--Section 4709(b) of such Act (50 
     U.S.C. 2749(b)) is amended by striking ``athorization'' and 
     inserting ``authorization''.
       (o) Transfer of Defense Environmental Cleanup Funds.--
     Section 4710(b)(3)(B) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750(b)(3)(B)) 
     is amended by striking ``management'' and inserting 
     ``cleanup''.
       (p) Restriction on Use of Funds to Pay Certain Penalties.--
     Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended--
       (1) by inserting an em dash after ``Department of Energy 
     if'';
       (2) by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be 
     indented two ems from the left margin; and
       (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, or'' and inserting 
     ``; or''.
       (q) Research and Development by Certain Facilities.--
     Section 4832(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2812(a)) is amended by 
     striking ``for Nuclear Security''.
       (r) Report on Hanford Tank Safety.--Section 4441 of such 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2621) is amended by striking subsection (d).
       (s) Critical Technology Partnerships.--Section 4813(a) of 
     such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794(a)) is amended by striking ``that 
     atomic energy defense activities research on, and development 
     of, any dual-use critical technology'' and inserting ``that 
     research on and development of dual-use critical technology 
     carried out through atomic energy defense activities''.
       (t) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for such Act 
     is amended by striking the item relating to section 4710 and 
     inserting the following:
       ``Sec. 4710. Transfer of defense environmental cleanup 
           funds.''.

     SEC. 3142. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY 
                   ADMINISTRATION ACT.

       (a) Status of Certain Personnel.--Section 3220(c) of the 
     National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 
     2410(c)) is amended--
       (1) by inserting an em dash after ``activities between'';
       (2) by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be 
     indented two ems from the left margin; and
       (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, and'' and inserting 
     ``; and''.
       (b) Congressional Oversight of Certain Programs.--Section 
     3236(a)(2)(B)(iv) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2426(a)(2)(B)(iv)) 
     is amended--
       (1) by inserting an em dash after ``program for'';
       (2) by realigning subclauses (I), (II), and (III) so as to 
     be indented six ems from the left margin; and
       (3) in subclause (I), by striking ``year,'' and inserting 
     ``year;'' and
       (4) in subclause (II), by striking ``, and'' and inserting 
     ``; and''.

          TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

     SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION.

       There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
     2015, $30,150,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear 
     Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy 
     Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).

     SEC. 3202. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 
                   SAFETY BOARD.

       Subsection (a) of section 322 of the Atomic Energy Act of 
     1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286k(a)) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(a) In General.--The Inspector General of the Nuclear 
     Regulatory Commission shall serve as the Inspector General of 
     the Board, in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 
     1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).''.

[[Page 8678]]



     SEC. 3203. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 
                   SAFETY BOARD.

       (a) In General.--Section 313(b)(1)(A) of the Atomic Energy 
     Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286b(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 
     ``150 full-time employees'' and inserting ``120 full-time 
     employees''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
     shall take effect on October 1, 2015.

                 TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

     SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       (a) Amount.--There are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
     to the Secretary of Energy $19,950,000 for fiscal year 2015 
     for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 
     of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval 
     petroleum reserves.
       (b) Period of Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to 
     the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall 
     remain available until expended.

                  TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

     SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL 
                   SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2015.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2015, to be available without fiscal year limitation if 
     so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the 
     Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration 
     programs associated with maintaining national security 
     aspects of the merchant marine, as follows:
       (1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United 
     States Merchant Marine Academy, $79,790,000, of which--
       (A) $65,290,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     Academy operations;
       (B) $14,500,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     capital asset management at the Academy.
       (2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime 
     academies, $17,650,000, of which--
       (A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     student incentive payments;
       (B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     direct payments to such academies;
       (C) $11,300,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training 
     vessels; and
       (D) $350,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     improving the monitoring of graduates' service obligation.
       (3) For expenses necessary to support Maritime 
     Administration operations and programs, $50,960,000.
       (4) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the 
     National Defense Reserve Fleet, $4,800,000, to remain 
     available until expended.
       (5) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-
     flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of 
     the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United 
     States Code, $186,000,000.
       (6) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the 
     Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan 
     guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of 
     title 46, United States Code, $73,100,000, of which 
     $3,100,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     administrative expenses of the program.

     SEC. 3502. SPECIAL RULE FOR DD-17.

       (a) In General.--A vessel of the Navy transported in DD-17 
     (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) in the waters of the State of 
     Alabama shall not be treated as merchandise for purposes of 
     section 55102 of title 46, United States Code.
       (b) Limitation.--If DD-17 (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) is 
     sold after the date of the enactment of this Act, subsection 
     (a) shall cease to have effect unless the purchaser of DD-17 
     is an eligible owner described in section 12103(b) of title 
     46, United States Code.

     SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC MARITIME 
                   INDUSTRY IN NATIONAL SECURITY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) the United States domestic maritime industry carries 
     hundreds of million of tons of cargo annually, supports 
     nearly 500,000 jobs, and provides nearly 100 billion in 
     annual economic output;
       (2) the Nation's military sealift capacity will benefit 
     from one of the fastest growing segments of the domestic 
     trades, 14 domestic trade tankers that are on order to be 
     constructed at United States shipyards as of February 1, 
     2014;
       (3) the domestic trades' vessel innovations that 
     transformed worldwide maritime commerce include the 
     development of containerships, self-unloading vessels, 
     articulated tug-barges, trailer barges, chemical parcel 
     tankers, railroad-on-barge carfloats, and river flotilla 
     towing systems;
       (4) the national security benefits of the domestic maritime 
     industry are unquestioned as the Department of Defense 
     depends on United States domestic trades' fleet of container 
     ships, roll-on/roll-off ships, and product tankers to carry 
     military cargoes;
       (5) the Department of Defense benefits from a robust 
     commercial shipyard and ship repair industry and current 
     growth in that sector is particularly important as Federal 
     budget cuts may reduce the number of new constructed military 
     vessels; and
       (6) the domestic fleet is essential to national security 
     and was a primary source of mariners needed to crew United 
     States Government-owned sealift vessels activated from 
     reserve status during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi 
     Freedom in the period 2002 through 2010.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     United States coastwise trade laws promote a strong domestic 
     trade maritime industry, which supports the national security 
     and economic vitality of the United States and the efficient 
     operation of the United States transportation system.

                       DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

     SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES.

       (a) In General.--Whenever a funding table in this division 
     specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, 
     or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified 
     dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby 
     authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
       (b) Merit-based Decisions.--A decision to commit, obligate, 
     or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of 
     a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
       (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in 
     accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 
     of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive 
     procedures; and
       (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law.
       (c) Relationship to Transfer and Programming Authority.--An 
     amount specified in the funding tables in this division may 
     be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or 
     reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this 
     Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an 
     amount specified in such funding tables shall not count 
     against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under 
     section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other 
     provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would 
     move funds between appropriation accounts.
       (d) Applicability to Classified Annex.--This section 
     applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.
       (e) Oral and Written Communications.--No oral or written 
     communication concerning any amount specified in the funding 
     tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of 
     this section.

                         TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

     SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             FY 2015          House
      Line                 Item              Request        Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                   ARMY
                  FIXED WING
002               UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT.          13,617          13,617
003               AERIAL COMMON SENSOR          185,090         185,090
                   (ACS) (MIP).
004               MQ-1 UAV.............         190,581         239,581
                      Extended range                            [49,000]
                      modifications Per
                      Army UFR.
005               RQ-11 (RAVEN)........           3,964           3,964
                  ROTARY
006               HELICOPTER, LIGHT             416,617         416,617
                   UTILITY (LUH).
007               AH-64 APACHE BLOCK            494,009         494,009
                   IIIA REMAN.
008                  ADVANCE                    157,338         157,338
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
012               UH-60 BLACKHAWK M           1,237,001       1,335,401
                   MODEL (MYP).
                      ARNG                                      [98,400]
                      Modernization-6
                      additional UH-60M
                      aircraft.
013                  ADVANCE                    132,138         132,138
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
014               CH-47 HELICOPTER.....         892,504         892,504
015                  ADVANCE                    102,361         102,361
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
                  MODIFICATION OF
                   AIRCRAFT
016               MQ-1 PAYLOAD (MIP)...          26,913          26,913

[[Page 8679]]

 
018               GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP).          14,182          14,182
019               MULTI SENSOR ABN              131,892         131,892
                   RECON (MIP).
020               AH-64 MODS...........         181,869         181,869
021               CH-47 CARGO                    32,092          32,092
                   HELICOPTER MODS
                   (MYP).
022               UTILITY/CARGO                  15,029          15,029
                   AIRPLANE MODS.
023               UTILITY HELICOPTER             76,515          83,315
                   MODS.
                      ARNG                                       [6,800]
                      Modernization-UH-
                      60A to UH-60L
                      conversions.
025               NETWORK AND MISSION           114,182         114,182
                   PLAN.
026               COMMS, NAV                    115,795         115,795
                   SURVEILLANCE.
027               GATM ROLLUP..........          54,277          54,277
028               RQ-7 UAV MODS........         125,380         125,380
                  GROUND SUPPORT
                   AVIONICS
029               AIRCRAFT                       66,450          98,850
                   SURVIVABILITY
                   EQUIPMENT.
                      Army requested                            [32,400]
                      realignment.
030               SURVIVABILITY CM.....                           7,800
                      Army requested                             [7,800]
                      realignment.
031               CMWS.................         107,364          60,364
                      Army requested                           [-47,000]
                      reduction.
                  OTHER SUPPORT
032               AVIONICS SUPPORT                6,847           6,847
                   EQUIPMENT.
033               COMMON GROUND                  29,231          29,231
                   EQUIPMENT.
034               AIRCREW INTEGRATED             48,081          48,081
                   SYSTEMS.
035               AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL..         127,232         127,232
036               INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES           1,203           1,203
037               LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET           2,931           2,931
                       TOTAL AIRCRAFT         5,102,685       5,250,085
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       ARMY.
 
                  MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
                   ARMY
                  SURFACE-TO-AIR
                   MISSILE SYSTEM
002               LOWER TIER AIR AND            110,300         110,300
                   MISSILE DEFENSE
                   (AMD).
003               MSE MISSILE..........         384,605         384,605
                  AIR-TO-SURFACE
                   MISSILE SYSTEM
004               HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY.           4,452           4,452
                  ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
                   MISSILE SYS
005               JAVELIN (AAWS-M)               77,668          77,668
                   SYSTEM SUMMARY.
006               TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY.          50,368          50,368
007                  ADVANCE                     19,984          19,984
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
008               GUIDED MLRS ROCKET            127,145         127,145
                   (GMLRS).
009               MLRS REDUCED RANGE             21,274          21,274
                   PRACTICE ROCKETS
                   (RRPR).
                  MODIFICATIONS
012               PATRIOT MODS.........         131,838         131,838
013               STINGER MODS.........           1,355           1,355
014               AVENGER MODS.........           5,611           5,611
015               ITAS/TOW MODS........          19,676          19,676
016               MLRS MODS............          10,380          10,380
017               HIMARS MODIFICATIONS.           6,008           6,008
                  SPARES AND REPAIR
                   PARTS
018               SPARES AND REPAIR              36,930          36,930
                   PARTS.
                  SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                   FACILITIES
019               AIR DEFENSE TARGETS..           3,657           3,657
020               ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           1,522           1,522
                   (MISSILES).
021               PRODUCTION BASE                 4,710           4,710
                   SUPPORT.
                       TOTAL MISSILE          1,017,483       1,017,483
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       ARMY.
 
                  PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
                   ARMY
                  TRACKED COMBAT
                   VEHICLES
001               STRYKER VEHICLE......         385,110         385,110
                  MODIFICATION OF
                   TRACKED COMBAT
                   VEHICLES
002               STRYKER (MOD)........          39,683          89,683
                      Unfunded                                  [50,000]
                      requirement-
                      Fourth DVH
                      Brigade Set.
003               FIST VEHICLE (MOD)...          26,759          26,759
004               BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)         107,506         107,506
005               HOWITZER, MED SP FT            45,411          45,411
                   155MM M109A6 (MOD).
006               PALADIN INTEGRATED            247,400         247,400
                   MANAGEMENT (PIM).
007               IMPROVED RECOVERY              50,451          50,451
                   VEHICLE (M88A2
                   HERCULES).
008               ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD).           2,473           2,473
009               ASSAULT BREACHER               36,583          36,583
                   VEHICLE.
010               M88 FOV MODS.........           1,975          73,975
                      Unfunded                                  [72,000]
                      requirement-
                      Industrial Base
                      Initiative.
011               JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE.          49,462          49,462
012               M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD).         237,023         237,023
013               ABRAMS UPGRADE                                120,000
                   PROGRAM.
                      Industrial Base                          [120,000]
                      initiative.
                  SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                   FACILITIES
014               PRODUCTION BASE                 6,478           6,478
                   SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV).
                  WEAPONS & OTHER
                   COMBAT VEHICLES
016               MORTAR SYSTEMS.......           5,012           5,012
017               XM320 GRENADE                  28,390          28,390
                   LAUNCHER MODULE
                   (GLM).
018               COMPACT SEMI-                     148             148
                   AUTOMATIC SNIPER
                   SYSTEM.

[[Page 8680]]

 
019               CARBINE..............          29,366          20,616
                      Army requested                            [-8,750]
                      realignment.
021               COMMON REMOTELY                 8,409           8,409
                   OPERATED WEAPONS
                   STATION.
022               HANDGUN..............           3,957           1,957
                      Funding ahead of                          [-2,000]
                      need.
                  MOD OF WEAPONS AND
                   OTHER COMBAT VEH
024               M777 MODS............          18,166          18,166
025               M4 CARBINE MODS......           3,446           6,446
                      Army requested                             [3,000]
                      realignment.
026               M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN          25,296          25,296
                   MODS.
027               M249 SAW MACHINE GUN            5,546           5,546
                   MODS.
028               M240 MEDIUM MACHINE             4,635           2,635
                   GUN MODS.
                      Army requested                            [-2,000]
                      realignment.
029               SNIPER RIFLES                   4,079           4,079
                   MODIFICATIONS.
030               M119 MODIFICATIONS...          72,718          72,718
031               M16 RIFLE MODS.......           1,952               0
                      Army requested                            [-1,952]
                      realignment.
032               MORTAR MODIFICATION..           8,903           8,903
033               MODIFICATIONS LESS              2,089           2,089
                   THAN $5.0M (WOCV-
                   WTCV).
                  SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                   FACILITIES
034               ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           2,005           2,005
                   (WOCV-WTCV).
035               PRODUCTION BASE                 8,911           8,911
                   SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV).
036               INDUSTRIAL                        414             414
                   PREPAREDNESS.
037               SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT            1,682           1,682
                   (SOLDIER ENH PROG).
                       TOTAL                  1,471,438       1,701,736
                       PROCUREMENT OF
                       W&TCV, ARMY.
 
                  PROCUREMENT OF
                   AMMUNITION, ARMY
                  SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
                   AMMUNITION
001               CTG, 5.56MM, ALL               34,943          34,943
                   TYPES.
002               CTG, 7.62MM, ALL               12,418          12,418
                   TYPES.
003               CTG, HANDGUN, ALL               9,655           8,155
                   TYPES.
                      Funding ahead of                          [-1,500]
                      need.
004               CTG, .50 CAL, ALL              29,304          29,304
                   TYPES.
006               CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES.           8,181           8,181
007               CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES.          52,667          52,667
008               CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES.          40,904          40,904
                  MORTAR AMMUNITION
009               60MM MORTAR, ALL               41,742          41,742
                   TYPES.
010               81MM MORTAR, ALL               42,433          42,433
                   TYPES.
011               120MM MORTAR, ALL              39,365          39,365
                   TYPES.
                  TANK AMMUNITION
012               CARTRIDGES, TANK,             101,900         101,900
                   105MM AND 120MM, ALL
                   TYPES.
                  ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
013               ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES,          37,455          37,455
                   75MM & 105MM, ALL
                   TYPES.
014               ARTILLERY PROJECTILE,          47,023          47,023
                   155MM, ALL TYPES.
015               PROJ 155MM EXTENDED            35,672          35,672
                   RANGE M982.
016               ARTILLERY                      94,010          74,010
                   PROPELLANTS, FUZES
                   AND PRIMERS, ALL.
                      Precision Guided                         [-20,000]
                      Kits Schedule
                      Delay.
                  ROCKETS
019               SHOULDER LAUNCHED                 945             945
                   MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES.
020               ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL          27,286          27,286
                   TYPES.
                  OTHER AMMUNITION
021               DEMOLITION MUNITIONS,          22,899          22,899
                   ALL TYPES.
022               GRENADES, ALL TYPES..          22,751          22,751
023               SIGNALS, ALL TYPES...           7,082           7,082
024               SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES          11,638          11,638
                  MISCELLANEOUS
025               AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL            3,594           3,594
                   TYPES.
027               CAD/PAD ALL TYPES....           5,430           5,430
028               ITEMS LESS THAN $5              8,337           8,337
                   MILLION (AMMO).
029               AMMUNITION PECULIAR            14,906          14,906
                   EQUIPMENT.
030               FIRST DESTINATION              14,349          14,349
                   TRANSPORTATION
                   (AMMO).
031               CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES.             111             111
                  PRODUCTION BASE
                   SUPPORT
032               PROVISION OF                  148,092         146,192
                   INDUSTRIAL
                   FACILITIES.
                      Unjustified                               [-1,900]
                      request.
033               CONVENTIONAL                  113,881         113,881
                   MUNITIONS
                   DEMILITARIZATION.
034               ARMS INITIATIVE......           2,504           2,504
                       TOTAL                  1,031,477       1,008,077
                       PROCUREMENT OF
                       AMMUNITION, ARMY.
 
                  OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                   ARMY
                  TACTICAL VEHICLES
001               TACTICAL TRAILERS/              7,987           7,987
                   DOLLY SETS.
002               SEMITRAILERS,                     160             160
                   FLATBED:.
004               JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL          164,615         164,615
                   VEHICLE.
005               FAMILY OF MEDIUM                               50,000
                   TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
                      Additional FMTVs -                        [50,000]
                       Industrial Base
                      initiative.
006               FIRETRUCKS &                    8,415           8,415
                   ASSOCIATED
                   FIREFIGHTING EQUIP.
007               FAMILY OF HEAVY                28,425          78,425
                   TACTICAL VEHICLES
                   (FHTV).

[[Page 8681]]

 
                      Additional HEMTT                          [50,000]
                      ESP Vehicles-
                      Industrial Base
                      initiative.
008               PLS ESP..............          89,263          89,263
013               TACTICAL WHEELED               38,226          38,226
                   VEHICLE PROTECTION
                   KITS.
014               MODIFICATION OF IN             91,173          83,173
                   SVC EQUIP.
                      Early to need....                         [-8,000]
015               MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-         14,731          14,731
                   PROTECTED (MRAP)
                   MODS.
                  NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
016               HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN..             175             175
017               PASSENGER CARRYING              1,338           1,338
                   VEHICLES.
018               NONTACTICAL VEHICLES,          11,101          11,101
                   OTHER.
                  COMM--JOINT
                   COMMUNICATIONS
019               WIN-T--GROUND FORCES          763,087         638,087
                   TACTICAL NETWORK.
                      Unobligated                             [-125,000]
                      balances.
020               SIGNAL MODERNIZATION           21,157          21,157
                   PROGRAM.
021               JOINT INCIDENT SITE             7,915           7,915
                   COMMUNICATIONS
                   CAPABILITY.
022               JCSE EQUIPMENT                  5,440           5,440
                   (USREDCOM).
                  COMM--SATELLITE
                   COMMUNICATIONS
023               DEFENSE ENTERPRISE            118,085         118,085
                   WIDEBAND SATCOM
                   SYSTEMS.
024               TRANSPORTABLE                  13,999          13,999
                   TACTICAL COMMAND
                   COMMUNICATIONS.
025               SHF TERM.............           6,494           6,494
026               NAVSTAR GLOBAL                  1,635           1,635
                   POSITIONING SYSTEM
                   (SPACE).
027               SMART-T (SPACE)......          13,554          13,554
028               GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--            18,899          18,899
                   GBS.
029               MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP             2,849           2,849
                   (TAC SAT).
030               ENROUTE MISSION               100,000         100,000
                   COMMAND (EMC).
                  COMM--COMBAT
                   COMMUNICATIONS
033               JOINT TACTICAL RADIO          175,711         125,711
                   SYSTEM.
                      Unobligated                              [-50,000]
                      balances.
034               MID-TIER NETWORKING             9,692           4,692
                   VEHICULAR RADIO
                   (MNVR).
                      Unobligated                               [-5,000]
                      balances.
035               RADIO TERMINAL SET,            17,136          17,136
                   MIDS LVT(2).
037               AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--           22,099          22,099
                   OPA2.
038               TRACTOR DESK.........           3,724           3,724
039               SPIDER APLA REMOTE                969             969
                   CONTROL UNIT.
040               SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT               294             294
                   PROGRAM COMM/
                   ELECTRONICS.
041               TACTICAL                       24,354          24,354
                   COMMUNICATIONS AND
                   PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
042               UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE          17,445          17,445
043               RADIO, IMPROVED HF              1,028           1,028
                   (COTS) FAMILY.
044               FAMILY OF MED COMM             22,614          22,614
                   FOR COMBAT CASUALTY
                   CARE.
                  COMM--INTELLIGENCE
                   COMM
046               CI AUTOMATION                   1,519           1,519
                   ARCHITECTURE.
047               ARMY CA/MISO GPF               12,478          12,478
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  INFORMATION SECURITY
050               INFORMATION SYSTEM              2,113           2,113
                   SECURITY PROGRAM-
                   ISSP.
051               COMMUNICATIONS                 69,646          69,646
                   SECURITY (COMSEC).
                  COMM--LONG HAUL
                   COMMUNICATIONS
052               BASE SUPPORT                   28,913          28,913
                   COMMUNICATIONS.
                  COMM--BASE
                   COMMUNICATIONS
053               INFORMATION SYSTEMS..          97,091          97,091
054               DEFENSE MESSAGE                   246             246
                   SYSTEM (DMS).
055               EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT            5,362           5,362
                   MODERNIZATION
                   PROGRAM.
056               INSTALLATION INFO              79,965          79,965
                   INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
                   PROGRAM.
                  ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
                   REL ACT (TIARA)
060               JTT/CIBS-M...........             870             870
061               PROPHET GROUND.......          55,896          55,896
063               DCGS-A (MIP).........         128,207         128,207
064               JOINT TACTICAL GROUND           5,286           5,286
                   STATION (JTAGS).
065               TROJAN (MIP).........          12,614          12,614
066               MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP             3,901           3,901
                   (INTEL SPT) (MIP).
067               CI HUMINT AUTO                  7,392           7,392
                   REPRTING AND
                   COLL(CHARCS).
                  ELECT EQUIP--
                   ELECTRONIC WARFARE
                   (EW)
068               LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER            24,828          24,828
                   MORTAR RADAR.
070               AIR VIGILANCE (AV)...           7,000           7,000
072               COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/            1,285           1,285
                   SECURITY
                   COUNTERMEASURES.
                  ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
                   SURV. (TAC SURV)
075               SENTINEL MODS........          44,305          44,305
076               NIGHT VISION DEVICES.         160,901         160,901
078               SMALL TACTICAL                 18,520          18,520
                   OPTICAL RIFLE
                   MOUNTED MLRF.
080               INDIRECT FIRE                  68,296          68,296
                   PROTECTION FAMILY OF
                   SYSTEMS.
081               FAMILY OF WEAPON               49,205          34,205
                   SIGHTS (FWS).
                      Early to need....                        [-15,000]
082               ARTILLERY ACCURACY              4,896           4,896
                   EQUIP.
083               PROFILER.............           3,115           3,115
084               MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP             4,186           4,186
                   (FIREFINDER RADARS).
085               JOINT BATTLE COMMAND--         97,892          87,892
                   PLATFORM (JBC-P).
                      Schedule delay...                        [-10,000]
086               JOINT EFFECTS                  27,450          27,450
                   TARGETING SYSTEM
                   (JETS).
087               MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP            14,085          14,085
                   (LLDR).
088               MORTAR FIRE CONTROL            29,040          29,040
                   SYSTEM.

[[Page 8682]]

 
089               COUNTERFIRE RADARS...         209,050         159,050
                      Excessive LRIP/                          [-50,000]
                      concurrency costs.
                  ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
                   C2 SYSTEMS
092               FIRE SUPPORT C2                13,823          13,823
                   FAMILY.
095               AIR & MSL DEFENSE              27,374          27,374
                   PLANNING & CONTROL
                   SYS.
097               LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE             2,508           2,508
                   SUPPORT (LCSS).
099               NETWORK MANAGEMENT             21,524          21,524
                   INITIALIZATION AND
                   SERVICE.
100               MANEUVER CONTROL               95,455          95,455
                   SYSTEM (MCS).
101               GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT         118,600         118,600
                   SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A).
102               INTEGRATED PERSONNEL           32,970          32,970
                   AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY
                   (IPP.
104               RECONNAISSANCE AND             10,113          10,113
                   SURVEYING INSTRUMENT
                   SET.
                  ELECT EQUIP--
                   AUTOMATION
105               ARMY TRAINING                   9,015           9,015
                   MODERNIZATION.
106               AUTOMATED DATA                155,223         155,223
                   PROCESSING EQUIP.
107               GENERAL FUND                   16,581          16,581
                   ENTERPRISE BUSINESS
                   SYSTEMS FAM.
108               HIGH PERF COMPUTING            65,252          65,252
                   MOD PGM (HPCMP).
110               RESERVE COMPONENT              17,631          17,631
                   AUTOMATION SYS
                   (RCAS).
                  ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO
                   VISUAL SYS (A/V)
112               ITEMS LESS THAN $5M             5,437           5,437
                   (SURVEYING
                   EQUIPMENT).
                  ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
113               PRODUCTION BASE                   426             426
                   SUPPORT (C-E).
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
114A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..           3,707           3,707
                  CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
                   EQUIPMENT
115               FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL              937             937
                   EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
116               BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS            1,930           1,930
                   (BDS).
117               CBRN DEFENSE.........          17,468          17,468
                  BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
119               TACTICAL BRIDGE,                5,442           5,442
                   FLOAT-RIBBON.
120               COMMON BRIDGE                  11,013          11,013
                   TRANSPORTER (CBT)
                   RECAP.
                  ENGINEER (NON-
                   CONSTRUCTION)
                   EQUIPMENT
121               GRND STANDOFF MINE             37,649          33,249
                   DETECTN SYSM
                   (GSTAMIDS).
                      Early to need....                         [-4,400]
122               HUSKY MOUNTED                  18,545          18,545
                   DETECTION SYSTEM
                   (HMDS).
123               ROBOTIC COMBAT                  4,701           4,701
                   SUPPORT SYSTEM
                   (RCSS).
124               EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS            6,346           6,346
                   RECAPITALIZATION.
125               EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE             15,856          15,856
                   DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
                   EQPMT).
126               REMOTE DEMOLITION               4,485           4,485
                   SYSTEMS.
127                $5M, COUNTERMINE               4,938           4,938
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  COMBAT SERVICE
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
128               HEATERS AND ECU'S....           9,235           9,235
130               SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT..           1,677           1,677
131               PERSONNEL RECOVERY             16,728          16,728
                   SUPPORT SYSTEM
                   (PRSS).
132               GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM          84,761          84,761
134               FIELD FEEDING                  15,179          15,179
                   EQUIPMENT.
135               CARGO AERIAL DEL &             28,194          28,194
                   PERSONNEL PARACHUTE
                   SYSTEM.
137               FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT          41,967          41,967
                   AND CONSTRUCTION
                   SETS.
138               ITEMS LESS THAN $5M            20,090          20,090
                   (ENG SPT).
                  PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
139               QUALITY SURVEILLANCE            1,435           1,435
                   EQUIPMENT.
140               DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS,          40,692          40,692
                   PETROLEUM & WATER.
                  MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
141               COMBAT SUPPORT                 46,957          46,957
                   MEDICAL.
                  MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
142               MOBILE MAINTENANCE             23,758          23,758
                   EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.
143               ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           2,789           2,789
                   (MAINT EQ).
                  CONSTRUCTION
                   EQUIPMENT
144               GRADER, ROAD MTZD,              5,827           5,827
                   HVY, 6X4 (CCE).
145               SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING          14,926          14,926
147               COMPACTOR............           4,348           4,348
148               HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR..           4,938           4,938
149               TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED          34,071          34,071
150               ALL TERRAIN CRANES...           4,938           4,938
151               PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING             667             667
153               ENHANCED RAPID                 14,924          14,924
                   AIRFIELD
                   CONSTRUCTION CAPAP.
154               CONST EQUIP ESP......          15,933          15,933
155               ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           6,749           6,749
                   (CONST EQUIP).
                  RAIL FLOAT
                   CONTAINERIZATION
                   EQUIPMENT
156               ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP..          10,509          10,509
157               ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           2,166           2,166
                   (FLOAT/RAIL).
                  GENERATORS
158               GENERATORS AND                115,190         105,190
                   ASSOCIATED EQUIP.
                      Cost savings from                        [-10,000]
                      new contract.
                  MATERIAL HANDLING
                   EQUIPMENT
160               FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS..          14,327          14,327
                  TRAINING EQUIPMENT
161               COMBAT TRAINING                65,062          65,062
                   CENTERS SUPPORT.
162               TRAINING DEVICES,             101,295         101,295
                   NONSYSTEM.
163               CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL          13,406          13,406
                   TRAINER.

[[Page 8683]]

 
164               AVIATION COMBINED              14,440          14,440
                   ARMS TACTICAL
                   TRAINER.
165               GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN           10,165          10,165
                   SUPPORT OF ARMY
                   TRAINING.
                  TEST MEASURE AND DIG
                   EQUIPMENT (TMD)
166               CALIBRATION SETS                5,726           5,726
                   EQUIPMENT.
167               INTEGRATED FAMILY OF           37,482          37,482
                   TEST EQUIPMENT
                   (IFTE).
168               TEST EQUIPMENT                 16,061          16,061
                   MODERNIZATION
                   (TEMOD).
                  OTHER SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
170               RAPID EQUIPPING                 2,380           2,380
                   SOLDIER SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT.
171               PHYSICAL SECURITY              30,686          30,686
                   SYSTEMS (OPA3).
172               BASE LEVEL COMMON               1,008           1,008
                   EQUIPMENT.
173               MODIFICATION OF IN-            98,559          83,559
                   SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-
                   3).
                      Early to need--                          [-15,000]
                      watercraft C4ISR.
174               PRODUCTION BASE                 1,697           1,697
                   SUPPORT (OTH).
175               SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR          25,394          25,394
                   USER TESTING.
176               AMC CRITICAL ITEMS             12,975          12,975
                   OPA3.
                  OPA2
180               INITIAL SPARES--C&E..          50,032          50,032
                       TOTAL OTHER            4,893,634       4,701,234
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       ARMY.
 
                  JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE
                   DEV DEFEAT FUND
                  STAFF AND
                   INFRASTRUCTURE
004               OPERATIONS...........         115,058               0
                      Transfer of                              [-65,558]
                      JIEDDO to
                      Overseas
                      Contingency
                      Operations.
                      Unjustified                              [-49,500]
                      request.
                       TOTAL JOINT IMPR         115,058               0
                       EXPLOSIVE DEV
                       DEFEAT FUND.
 
                  AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                   NAVY
                  COMBAT AIRCRAFT
001               EA-18G...............          43,547         493,547
                      Additional EA-18G                        [450,000]
                      aircraft.
005               JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER          610,652         610,652
                   CV.
006                  ADVANCE                     29,400          29,400
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
007               JSF STOVL............       1,200,410       1,200,410
008                  ADVANCE                    143,885         143,885
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
009               V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)...       1,487,000       1,487,000
010                  ADVANCE                     45,920          45,920
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
011               H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/          778,757         778,757
                   AH-1Z).
012                  ADVANCE                     80,926          80,926
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
013               MH-60S (MYP).........         210,209         210,209
015               MH-60R (MYP).........         933,882         880,482
                      CVN 73 Refueling                         [-53,400]
                      and Complex
                      Overhaul (RCOH).
016                  ADVANCE                    106,686         106,686
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
017               P-8A POSEIDON........       2,003,327       2,003,327
018                  ADVANCE                     48,457          48,457
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
019               E-2D ADV HAWKEYE.....         819,870         819,870
020                  ADVANCE                    225,765         225,765
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
                  OTHER AIRCRAFT
023               KC-130J..............          92,290          92,290
026                  ADVANCE                     37,445          37,445
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
027               MQ-8 UAV.............          40,663          40,663
                  MODIFICATION OF
                   AIRCRAFT
029               EA-6 SERIES..........          10,993          10,993
030               AEA SYSTEMS..........          34,768          34,768
031               AV-8 SERIES..........          65,472          65,472
032               ADVERSARY............           8,418           8,418
033               F-18 SERIES..........         679,177         679,177
034               H-46 SERIES..........             480             480
036               H-53 SERIES..........          38,159          38,159
037               SH-60 SERIES.........         108,850         108,850
038               H-1 SERIES...........          45,033          45,033
039               EP-3 SERIES..........          32,890          50,890
                      Obsolescence                               [5,000]
                      issues.
                      SIGINT                                    [13,000]
                      Architecture
                      Modernization
                      Common
                      Configuration.
040               P-3 SERIES...........           2,823           2,823
041               E-2 SERIES...........          21,208          21,208
042               TRAINER A/C SERIES...          12,608          12,608
044               C-130 SERIES.........          40,378          40,378
045               FEWSG................             640             640
046               CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C             4,635           4,635
                   SERIES.
047               E-6 SERIES...........         212,876         212,876
048               EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS          71,328          71,328
                   SERIES.
049               SPECIAL PROJECT                21,317          21,317
                   AIRCRAFT.
050               T-45 SERIES..........          90,052          90,052
051               POWER PLANT CHANGES..          19,094          19,094
052               JPATS SERIES.........           1,085           1,085
054               COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT.         155,644         155,644
055               COMMON AVIONICS               157,531         157,531
                   CHANGES.
056               COMMON DEFENSIVE                1,958           1,958
                   WEAPON SYSTEM.
057               ID SYSTEMS...........          38,880          38,880

[[Page 8684]]

 
058               P-8 SERIES...........          29,797          29,797
059               MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION          14,770          14,770
060               MQ-8 SERIES..........           8,741           8,741
061               RQ-7 SERIES..........           2,542           2,542
062               V-22 (TILT/ROTOR              135,584         135,584
                   ACFT) OSPREY.
063               F-35 STOVL SERIES....         285,968         285,968
064               F-35 CV SERIES.......          20,502          20,502
                  AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
                   REPAIR PARTS
065               SPARES AND REPAIR           1,229,651       1,226,651
                   PARTS.
                      Program decrease.                         [-3,000]
                  AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
                   EQUIP & FACILITIES
066               COMMON GROUND                 418,355         418,355
                   EQUIPMENT.
067               AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL            23,843          23,843
                   FACILITIES.
068               WAR CONSUMABLES......          15,939          15,939
069               OTHER PRODUCTION                5,630           5,630
                   CHARGES.
070               SPECIAL SUPPORT                65,839          65,839
                   EQUIPMENT.
071               FIRST DESTINATION               1,768           1,768
                   TRANSPORTATION.
                       TOTAL AIRCRAFT        13,074,317      13,485,917
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       NAVY.
 
                  WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
                   NAVY
                  MODIFICATION OF
                   MISSILES
001               TRIDENT II MODS......       1,190,455       1,190,455
                  SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                   FACILITIES
002               MISSILE INDUSTRIAL              5,671           5,671
                   FACILITIES.
                  STRATEGIC MISSILES
003               TOMAHAWK.............         194,258         276,258
                      Minimum                                   [82,000]
                      sustaining rate
                      increase.
                  TACTICAL MISSILES
004               AMRAAM...............          32,165          22,165
                      Program decrease.                        [-10,000]
005               SIDEWINDER...........          73,928          73,928
006               JSOW.................         130,759         130,759
007               STANDARD MISSILE.....         445,836         445,836
008               RAM..................          80,792          80,792
011               STAND OFF PRECISION             1,810           1,810
                   GUIDED MUNITIONS
                   (SOPGM).
012               AERIAL TARGETS.......          48,046          48,046
013               OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT           3,295           3,295
                  MODIFICATION OF
                   MISSILES
014               ESSM.................         119,434         119,434
015               HARM MODS............         111,739         111,739
                  SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                   FACILITIES
016               WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL              2,531           2,531
                   FACILITIES.
017               FLEET SATELLITE COMM          208,700         199,700
                   FOLLOW-ON.
                      Excess to need...                         [-9,000]
                  ORDNANCE SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
018               ORDNANCE SUPPORT               73,211          73,211
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  TORPEDOES AND RELATED
                   EQUIP
019               SSTD.................           6,562           6,562
020               MK-48 TORPEDO........          14,153          14,153
021               ASW TARGETS..........           2,515           2,515
                  MOD OF TORPEDOES AND
                   RELATED EQUIP
022               MK-54 TORPEDO MODS...          98,928          98,928
023               MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP            46,893          46,893
                   MODS.
024               QUICKSTRIKE MINE.....           6,966           6,966
                  SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
025               TORPEDO SUPPORT                52,670          52,670
                   EQUIPMENT.
026               ASW RANGE SUPPORT....           3,795           3,795
                  DESTINATION
                   TRANSPORTATION
027               FIRST DESTINATION               3,692           3,692
                   TRANSPORTATION.
                  GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
028               SMALL ARMS AND                 13,240          13,240
                   WEAPONS.
                  MODIFICATION OF GUNS
                   AND GUN MOUNTS
029               CIWS MODS............          75,108          75,108
030               COAST GUARD WEAPONS..          18,948          18,948
031               GUN MOUNT MODS.......          62,651          62,651
033               AIRBORNE MINE                  15,006          15,006
                   NEUTRALIZATION
                   SYSTEMS.
                  SPARES AND REPAIR
                   PARTS
035               SPARES AND REPAIR              74,188          74,188
                   PARTS.
                       TOTAL WEAPONS          3,217,945       3,280,945
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       NAVY.
 
                  PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
                   NAVY & MC
                  NAVY AMMUNITION
001               GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS         107,069         107,069
002               AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL          70,396          70,396
                   TYPES.
003               MACHINE GUN                    20,284          20,284
                   AMMUNITION.
004               PRACTICE BOMBS.......          26,701          26,701
005               CARTRIDGES & CART              53,866          53,866
                   ACTUATED DEVICES.
006               AIR EXPENDABLE                 59,294          59,294
                   COUNTERMEASURES.
007               JATOS................           2,766           2,766

[[Page 8685]]

 
008               LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE           113,092         113,092
                   ATTACK PROJECTILE.
009               5 INCH/54 GUN                  35,702          35,702
                   AMMUNITION.
010               INTERMEDIATE CALIBER           36,475          36,475
                   GUN AMMUNITION.
011               OTHER SHIP GUN                 43,906          43,906
                   AMMUNITION.
012               SMALL ARMS & LANDING           51,535          51,535
                   PARTY AMMO.
013               PYROTECHNIC AND                11,652          11,652
                   DEMOLITION.
014               AMMUNITION LESS THAN            4,473           4,473
                   $5 MILLION.
                  MARINE CORPS
                   AMMUNITION
015               SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION          31,708          31,708
016               LINEAR CHARGES, ALL               692             692
                   TYPES.
017               40 MM, ALL TYPES.....          13,630          13,630
018               60MM, ALL TYPES......           2,261           2,261
019               81MM, ALL TYPES......           1,496           1,496
020               120MM, ALL TYPES.....          14,855          14,855
022               GRENADES, ALL TYPES..           4,000           4,000
023               ROCKETS, ALL TYPES...          16,853          16,853
024               ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES.          14,772          14,772
026               FUZE, ALL TYPES......           9,972           9,972
027               NON LETHALS..........             998             998
028               AMMO MODERNIZATION...          12,319          12,319
029               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             11,178          11,178
                   MILLION.
                       TOTAL                    771,945         771,945
                       PROCUREMENT OF
                       AMMO, NAVY & MC.
 
                  SHIPBUILDING &
                   CONVERSION, NAVY
                  OTHER WARSHIPS
001               CARRIER REPLACEMENT         1,300,000       1,300,000
                   PROGRAM.
002               VIRGINIA CLASS              3,553,254       3,553,254
                   SUBMARINE.
003                  ADVANCE                  2,330,325       2,330,325
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
004               CVN REFUELING                                 483,600
                   OVERHAULS.
                      CVN 73 Refueling                         [483,600]
                      and Complex
                      Overhaul (RCOH).
006               DDG 1000.............         419,532         365,532
                      DDG-1000.........                        [-54,000]
007               DDG-51...............       2,671,415       2,671,415
008                  ADVANCE                    134,039         134,039
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
009               LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.       1,427,049         977,049
                      Reduction of 1                          [-450,000]
                      LCS.
009A                 ADVANCE                                    100,000
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
                      Program                                  [100,000]
                      requirement.
                  AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
010               LPD-17...............          12,565         812,565
                      Incremental                              [800,000]
                      funding for LPD-
                      28.
014                  ADVANCE                     29,093          29,093
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
015               JOINT HIGH SPEED                4,590           4,590
                   VESSEL.
                  AUXILIARIES, CRAFT
                   AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM
                   COST
016               MOORED TRAINING SHIP.         737,268         517,268
                      Moored Training                         [-220,000]
                      Ship.
017                  ADVANCE                     64,388          64,388
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
018               OUTFITTING...........         546,104         546,104
019               SHIP TO SHORE                 123,233         123,233
                   CONNECTOR.
020               LCAC SLEP............          40,485          40,485
021               COMPLETION OF PY            1,007,285       1,007,285
                   SHIPBUILDING
                   PROGRAMS.
                       TOTAL                 14,400,625      15,060,225
                       SHIPBUILDING &
                       CONVERSION, NAVY.
 
                  OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                   NAVY
                  SHIP PROPULSION
                   EQUIPMENT
001               LM-2500 GAS TURBINE..           7,822           7,822
002               ALLISON 501K GAS                2,155           2,155
                   TURBINE.
003               HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE          22,704          15,704
                   (HED).
                      Hybrid Electric                           [-7,000]
                      Drive.
                  GENERATORS
004               SURFACE COMBATANT              29,120          22,120
                   HM&E.
                      Surface Combatant                         [-7,000]
                      HM&E.
                  NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
005               OTHER NAVIGATION               45,431          45,431
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  PERISCOPES
006               SUB PERISCOPES &               60,970          52,670
                   IMAGING EQUIP.
                      Submarine                                 [-8,300]
                      Periscopes and
                      Imaging Equipment.
                  OTHER SHIPBOARD
                   EQUIPMENT
007               DDG MOD..............         338,569         338,569
008               FIREFIGHTING                   15,486          15,486
                   EQUIPMENT.
009               COMMAND AND CONTROL             2,219           2,219
                   SWITCHBOARD.
010               LHA/LHD MIDLIFE......          17,928          17,928
011               LCC 19/20 EXTENDED             22,025          22,025
                   SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM.
012               POLLUTION CONTROL              12,607          12,607
                   EQUIPMENT.
013               SUBMARINE SUPPORT              16,492          16,492
                   EQUIPMENT.
014               VIRGINIA CLASS                 74,129          74,129
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
015               LCS CLASS SUPPORT              36,206          36,206
                   EQUIPMENT.
016               SUBMARINE BATTERIES..          37,352          37,352
017               LPD CLASS SUPPORT              49,095          49,095
                   EQUIPMENT.

[[Page 8686]]

 
018               ELECTRONIC DRY AIR...           2,996           2,996
019               STRATEGIC PLATFORM             11,558          11,558
                   SUPPORT EQUIP.
020               DSSP EQUIPMENT.......           5,518           5,518
022               LCAC.................           7,158           7,158
023               UNDERWATER EOD                 58,783          53,783
                   PROGRAMS.
                      Underwater EOD                            [-5,000]
                      programs.
024               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             68,748          68,748
                   MILLION.
025               CHEMICAL WARFARE                2,937           2,937
                   DETECTORS.
026               SUBMARINE LIFE                  8,385           8,385
                   SUPPORT SYSTEM.
                  REACTOR PLANT
                   EQUIPMENT
027               REACTOR POWER UNITS..                         298,200
                      CVN 73 Refueling                         [298,200]
                      and Complex
                      Overhaul (RCOH).
028               REACTOR COMPONENTS...         288,822         288,822
                  OCEAN ENGINEERING
029               DIVING AND SALVAGE             10,572          10,572
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  SMALL BOATS
030               STANDARD BOATS.......         129,784          80,784
                      Standard Boats...                        [-49,000]
                  TRAINING EQUIPMENT
031               OTHER SHIPS TRAINING           17,152          17,152
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  PRODUCTION FACILITIES
                   EQUIPMENT
032               OPERATING FORCES IPE.          39,409          39,409
                  OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
033               NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS..         118,129         118,129
034               LCS COMMON MISSION             37,413          37,413
                   MODULES EQUIPMENT.
035               LCS MCM MISSION                15,270          15,270
                   MODULES.
036               LCS ASW MISSION                 2,729           2,729
                   MODULES.
037               LCS SUW MISSION                44,208          44,208
                   MODULES.
038               REMOTE MINEHUNTING             42,276          42,276
                   SYSTEM (RMS).
                  SHIP SONARS
040               SPQ-9B RADAR.........          28,007          28,007
041               AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW             79,802          79,802
                   COMBAT SYSTEM.
042               SSN ACOUSTICS........         165,655         165,655
043               UNDERSEA WARFARE                9,487           9,487
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
044               SONAR SWITCHES AND             11,621          11,621
                   TRANSDUCERS.
                  ASW ELECTRONIC
                   EQUIPMENT
046               SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC             24,221          24,221
                   WARFARE SYSTEM.
047               SSTD.................          12,051          12,051
048               FIXED SURVEILLANCE            170,831         170,831
                   SYSTEM.
049               SURTASS..............           9,619           9,619
050               MARITIME PATROL AND            14,390          14,390
                   RECONNSAISANCE FORCE.
                  ELECTRONIC WARFARE
                   EQUIPMENT
051               AN/SLQ-32............         214,582         214,582
                  RECONNAISSANCE
                   EQUIPMENT
052               SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT.         124,862         124,862
053               AUTOMATED                         164             164
                   IDENTIFICATION
                   SYSTEM (AIS).
                  SUBMARINE
                   SURVEILLANCE
                   EQUIPMENT
054               SUBMARINE SUPPORT              45,362          45,362
                   EQUIPMENT PROG.
                  OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC
                   EQUIPMENT
055               COOPERATIVE                    33,939          33,939
                   ENGAGEMENT
                   CAPABILITY.
056               TRUSTED INFORMATION               324             324
                   SYSTEM (TIS).
057               NAVAL TACTICAL                 18,192          18,192
                   COMMAND SUPPORT
                   SYSTEM (NTCSS).
058               ATDLS................          16,768          16,768
059               NAVY COMMAND AND                5,219           5,219
                   CONTROL SYSTEM
                   (NCCS).
060               MINESWEEPING SYSTEM            42,108          42,108
                   REPLACEMENT.
062               NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS          15,232          15,232
                   (SPACE).
063               AMERICAN FORCES RADIO           4,524           4,524
                   AND TV SERVICE.
064               STRATEGIC PLATFORM              6,382           6,382
                   SUPPORT EQUIP.
                  TRAINING EQUIPMENT
065               OTHER TRAINING                 46,122          46,122
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  AVIATION ELECTRONIC
                   EQUIPMENT
066               MATCALS..............          16,999          16,999
067               SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC           9,366           9,366
                   CONTROL.
068               AUTOMATIC CARRIER              21,357          21,357
                   LANDING SYSTEM.
069               NATIONAL AIR SPACE             26,639          26,639
                   SYSTEM.
070               FLEET AIR TRAFFIC               9,214           9,214
                   CONTROL SYSTEMS.
071               LANDING SYSTEMS......          13,902          13,902
072               ID SYSTEMS...........          34,901          34,901
073               NAVAL MISSION                  13,950          13,950
                   PLANNING SYSTEMS.
                  OTHER SHORE
                   ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
074               DEPLOYABLE JOINT                1,205           1,205
                   COMMAND & CONTROL.
075               MARITIME INTEGRATED             3,447           3,447
                   BROADCAST SYSTEM.
076               TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I            16,766          16,766
                   SYSTEMS.
077               DCGS-N...............          23,649          23,649
078               CANES................         357,589         357,589
079               RADIAC...............           8,343           8,343
080               CANES-INTELL.........          65,015          65,015
081               GPETE................           6,284           6,284
082               INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM             4,016           4,016
                   TEST FACILITY.

[[Page 8687]]

 
083               EMI CONTROL                     4,113           4,113
                   INSTRUMENTATION.
084               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             45,053          45,053
                   MILLION.
                  SHIPBOARD
                   COMMUNICATIONS
085               SHIPBOARD TACTICAL             14,410          14,410
                   COMMUNICATIONS.
086               SHIP COMMUNICATIONS            20,830          20,830
                   AUTOMATION.
088               COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS           14,145          14,145
                   UNDER $5M.
                  SUBMARINE
                   COMMUNICATIONS
089               SUBMARINE BROADCAST            11,057          11,057
                   SUPPORT.
090               SUBMARINE                      67,852          67,852
                   COMMUNICATION
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  SATELLITE
                   COMMUNICATIONS
091               SATELLITE                      13,218          13,268
                   COMMUNICATIONS
                   SYSTEMS.
                      CVN 73 Refueling                              [50]
                      and Complex
                      Overhaul (RCOH).
092               NAVY MULTIBAND                272,076         272,076
                   TERMINAL (NMT).
                  SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
093               JCS COMMUNICATIONS              4,369           4,369
                   EQUIPMENT.
094               ELECTRICAL POWER                1,402           1,402
                   SYSTEMS.
                  CRYPTOGRAPHIC
                   EQUIPMENT
095               INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY         110,766         110,766
                   PROGRAM (ISSP).
096               MIO INTEL                         979             979
                   EXPLOITATION TEAM.
                  CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
097               CRYPTOLOGIC                    11,502          11,502
                   COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP.
                  OTHER ELECTRONIC
                   SUPPORT
098               COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT           2,967           2,967
                  SONOBUOYS
100               SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES.         182,946         182,946
                  AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
101               WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT          47,944          47,944
                   EQUIPMENT.
103               AIRCRAFT SUPPORT               76,683          76,683
                   EQUIPMENT.
106               METEOROLOGICAL                 12,575          12,875
                   EQUIPMENT.
                      CVN 73 Refueling                             [300]
                      and Complex
                      Overhaul (RCOH).
107               DCRS/DPL.............           1,415           1,415
109               AIRBORNE MINE                  23,152          23,152
                   COUNTERMEASURES.
114               AVIATION SUPPORT               52,555          52,555
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  SHIP GUN SYSTEM
                   EQUIPMENT
115               SHIP GUN SYSTEMS                5,572           5,572
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS
                   EQUIPMENT
118               SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT          165,769         165,769
                   EQUIPMENT.
123               TOMAHAWK SUPPORT               61,462          61,462
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126               STRATEGIC MISSILE             229,832         229,832
                   SYSTEMS EQUIP.
                  ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
127               SSN COMBAT CONTROL             66,020          66,020
                   SYSTEMS.
128               ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT           7,559           7,559
                  OTHER ORDNANCE
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
132               EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE             20,619          20,619
                   DISPOSAL EQUIP.
133               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             11,251          11,251
                   MILLION.
                  OTHER EXPENDABLE
                   ORDNANCE
137               TRAINING DEVICE MODS.          84,080          84,080
                  CIVIL ENGINEERING
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
138               PASSENGER CARRYING              2,282           2,282
                   VEHICLES.
139               GENERAL PURPOSE                   547             547
                   TRUCKS.
140               CONSTRUCTION &                  8,949           8,949
                   MAINTENANCE EQUIP.
141               FIRE FIGHTING                  14,621          14,621
                   EQUIPMENT.
142               TACTICAL VEHICLES....             957             957
143               AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT.           8,187           8,187
144               POLLUTION CONTROL               2,942           2,942
                   EQUIPMENT.
145               ITEMS UNDER $5                 17,592          17,592
                   MILLION.
146               PHYSICAL SECURITY               1,177           1,177
                   VEHICLES.
                  SUPPLY SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
147               MATERIALS HANDLING             10,937          10,937
                   EQUIPMENT.
148               OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT           10,374          10,374
                   EQUIPMENT.
149               FIRST DESTINATION               5,668           5,668
                   TRANSPORTATION.
150               SPECIAL PURPOSE                90,921          90,921
                   SUPPLY SYSTEMS.
                  TRAINING DEVICES
151               TRAINING SUPPORT               22,046          22,046
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  COMMAND SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
152               COMMAND SUPPORT                24,208          24,208
                   EQUIPMENT.
153               EDUCATION SUPPORT                 874             874
                   EQUIPMENT.
154               MEDICAL SUPPORT                 2,634           2,634
                   EQUIPMENT.
156               NAVAL MIP SUPPORT               3,573           3,573
                   EQUIPMENT.
157               OPERATING FORCES                3,997           3,997
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
158               C4ISR EQUIPMENT......           9,638           9,638
159               ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT          21,001          21,001
                   EQUIPMENT.
160               PHYSICAL SECURITY              94,957          94,957
                   EQUIPMENT.
161               ENTERPRISE                     87,214          87,214
                   INFORMATION
                   TECHNOLOGY.
                  OTHER
164               NEXT GENERATION               116,165         116,165
                   ENTERPRISE SERVICE.
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
164A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..          10,847          10,847

[[Page 8688]]

 
                  SPARES AND REPAIR
                   PARTS
165               SPARES AND REPAIR             325,084         325,134
                   PARTS.
                      CVN 73 Refueling                              [50]
                      and Complex
                      Overhaul (RCOH).
                       TOTAL OTHER            5,975,828       6,198,128
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       NAVY.
 
                  PROCUREMENT, MARINE
                   CORPS
                  TRACKED COMBAT
                   VEHICLES
001               AAV7A1 PIP...........          16,756          16,756
002               LAV PIP..............          77,736          77,736
                  ARTILLERY AND OTHER
                   WEAPONS
003               EXPEDITIONARY FIRE              5,742             642
                   SUPPORT SYSTEM.
                      Per Marine Corps                          [-5,100]
                      excess to need.
004               155MM LIGHTWEIGHT               4,532           4,532
                   TOWED HOWITZER.
005               HIGH MOBILITY                  19,474          19,474
                   ARTILLERY ROCKET
                   SYSTEM.
006               WEAPONS AND COMBAT              7,250           7,250
                   VEHICLES UNDER $5
                   MILLION.
                  OTHER SUPPORT
007               MODIFICATION KITS....          21,909          21,909
008               WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT             3,208           3,208
                   PROGRAM.
                  GUIDED MISSILES
009               GROUND BASED AIR               31,439          31,439
                   DEFENSE.
010               JAVELIN..............             343             343
011               FOLLOW ON TO SMAW....           4,995           4,995
012               ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS              1,589           1,589
                   SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-
                   H).
                  OTHER SUPPORT
013               MODIFICATION KITS....           5,134           5,134
                  COMMAND AND CONTROL
                   SYSTEMS
014               UNIT OPERATIONS                 9,178           9,178
                   CENTER.
015               COMMON AVIATION                12,272          12,272
                   COMMAND AND CONTROL
                   SYSTEM (C.
                  REPAIR AND TEST
                   EQUIPMENT
016               REPAIR AND TEST                30,591          30,591
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
017               COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM           2,385           2,385
                  COMMAND AND CONTROL
                   SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
019               ITEMS UNDER $5                  4,205           4,205
                   MILLION (COMM &
                   ELEC).
020               AIR OPERATIONS C2               8,002           8,002
                   SYSTEMS.
                  RADAR + EQUIPMENT
                   (NON-TEL)
021               RADAR SYSTEMS........          19,595          19,595
022               U....................          89,230          89,230
023               RQ-21 UAS............          70,565          70,565
                  INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
                   (NON-TEL)
024               FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM..          11,860          11,860
025               INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT           44,340          44,340
                   EQUIPMENT.
028               RQ-11 UAV............           2,737           2,737
030               DCGS-MC..............          20,620          20,620
                  OTHER COMM/ELEC
                   EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
031               NIGHT VISION                    9,798           9,798
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
                   TEL)
032               NEXT GENERATION                 2,073           2,073
                   ENTERPRISE NETWORK
                   (NGEN).
033               COMMON COMPUTER                33,570          33,570
                   RESOURCES.
034               COMMAND POST SYSTEMS.          38,186          38,186
035               RADIO SYSTEMS........          64,494          64,494
036               COMM SWITCHING &               72,956          72,956
                   CONTROL SYSTEMS.
037               COMM & ELEC                    43,317          43,317
                   INFRASTRUCTURE
                   SUPPORT.
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
037A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..           2,498           2,498
                  ADMINISTRATIVE
                   VEHICLES
038               COMMERCIAL PASSENGER              332             332
                   VEHICLES.
039               COMMERCIAL CARGO               11,035          11,035
                   VEHICLES.
                  TACTICAL VEHICLES
040               5/4T TRUCK HMMWV               57,255          37,255
                   (MYP).
                      Early to need....                        [-20,000]
041               MOTOR TRANSPORT                   938             938
                   MODIFICATIONS.
044               JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL            7,500           7,500
                   VEHICLE.
045               FAMILY OF TACTICAL             10,179          10,179
                   TRAILERS.
                  OTHER SUPPORT
046               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             11,023          11,023
                   MILLION.
                  ENGINEER AND OTHER
                   EQUIPMENT
047               ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL             994             994
                   EQUIP ASSORT.
048               BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT           1,256           1,256
049               TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS           3,750           3,750
050               POWER EQUIPMENT                 8,985           8,985
                   ASSORTED.
051               AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT              4,418           4,418
                   EQUIPMENT.
052               EOD SYSTEMS..........           6,528           6,528
                  MATERIALS HANDLING
                   EQUIPMENT
053               PHYSICAL SECURITY              26,510          26,510
                   EQUIPMENT.
054               GARRISON MOBILE                 1,910           1,910
                   ENGINEER EQUIPMENT
                   (GMEE).
055               MATERIAL HANDLING               8,807           8,807
                   EQUIP.
056               FIRST DESTINATION                 128             128
                   TRANSPORTATION.
                  GENERAL PROPERTY

[[Page 8689]]

 
058               TRAINING DEVICES.....           3,412           3,412
059               CONTAINER FAMILY.....           1,662           1,662
060               FAMILY OF                       3,669           3,669
                   CONSTRUCTION
                   EQUIPMENT.
                  OTHER SUPPORT
062               ITEMS LESS THAN $5              4,272           4,272
                   MILLION.
                  SPARES AND REPAIR
                   PARTS
063               SPARES AND REPAIR              16,210          16,210
                   PARTS.
                       TOTAL                    983,352         958,252
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       MARINE CORPS.
 
                  AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                   AIR FORCE
                  TACTICAL FORCES
001               F-35.................       3,553,046       3,553,046
002                  ADVANCE                    291,880         291,880
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
                  TACTICAL AIRLIFT
003               KC-46A TANKER........       1,582,685       1,356,585
                      LRIP 1 Ramp Rate.                       [-226,100]
                  OTHER AIRLIFT
004               C-130J...............         482,396         482,396
005                  ADVANCE                    140,000         140,000
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
006               HC-130J..............         332,024         332,024
007                  ADVANCE                     50,000          50,000
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
008               MC-130J..............         190,971         190,971
009                  ADVANCE                     80,000          80,000
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
                  MISSION SUPPORT
                   AIRCRAFT
012               CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C.           2,562           2,562
                  OTHER AIRCRAFT
013               TARGET DRONES........          98,576          98,576
016               RQ-4.................          54,475          44,475
                      MPRTIP Sensor                            [-10,000]
                      Trainer reduction.
017               AC-130J..............               1               1
018               MQ-9.................         240,218         360,218
                      Program increase.                        [120,000]
                  STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
020               B-2A.................          23,865          23,865
021               B-1B.................         140,252         140,252
022               B-52.................         180,148         180,148
023               LARGE AIRCRAFT                 13,159          13,159
                   INFRARED
                   COUNTERMEASURES.
                  TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
025               F-15.................         387,314         387,314
026               F-16.................          12,336          12,336
027               F-22A................         180,207         180,207
028               F-35 MODIFICATIONS...         187,646         187,646
029                  ADVANCE                     28,500          28,500
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
                  AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
030               C-5..................          14,731          14,731
031               C-5M.................         331,466         281,466
                      Program execution                        [-50,000]
                      delay.
033               C-17A................         127,494         127,494
034               C-21.................             264             264
035               C-32A................           8,767           8,767
036               C-37A................          18,457          18,457
                  TRAINER AIRCRAFT
038               GLIDER MODS..........             132             132
039               T-6..................          14,486          14,486
040               T-1..................           7,650           7,650
041               T-38.................          34,845          34,845
                  OTHER AIRCRAFT
044               KC-10A (ATCA)........          34,313          34,313
045               C-12.................           1,960           1,960
048               VC-25A MOD...........           1,072           1,072
049               C-40.................           7,292           7,292
050               C-130................          35,869         109,671
                      8.33kHz radios...                         [-7,447]
                      C-130 8-Bladed                            [30,000]
                      Propeller upgrade.
                      C-130 AMP........                         [35,800]
                      CVR/DVR..........                         [-7,151]
                      T-56 3.5 Engine                           [22,600]
                      Mod.
051               C-130J MODS..........           7,919           7,919
052               C-135................          63,568          63,568
053               COMPASS CALL MODS....          57,828          57,828
054               RC-135...............         152,746         152,746
055               E-3..................          16,491          29,348
                      Program increase.                         [12,857]
056               E-4..................          22,341          22,341
058               AIRBORNE WARNING AND          160,284         160,284
                   CONTROL SYSTEM.
059               FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-         32,026          32,026
                   OF-SIGHT TERMINALS.
060               H-1..................           8,237           8,237
061               H-60.................          60,110          60,110
062               RQ-4 MODS............          21,354          21,354

[[Page 8690]]

 
063               HC/MC-130                       1,902           1,902
                   MODIFICATIONS.
064               OTHER AIRCRAFT.......          32,106          32,106
065               MQ-1 MODS............           4,755           1,555
                      Program reduction                         [-3,200]
066               MQ-9 MODS............         155,445         155,445
069               CV-22 MODS...........          74,874          74,874
069A              EJECTION SEAT                                   7,000
                   RELIABILITY
                   IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
                      Initial aircraft                           [7,000]
                      installation.
                  AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
                   REPAIR PARTS
070               INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR         466,562         424,532
                   PARTS.
                      Program decrease.                        [-42,030]
                  COMMON SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
071               AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT           22,470          22,470
                   SUPPORT EQUIP.
                  POST PRODUCTION
                   SUPPORT
074               B-2A.................          44,793          44,793
075               B-52.................           5,249           5,249
077               C-17A................          20,110          15,110
                      Program execution                         [-5,000]
                      delay.
078               CV-22 POST PRODUCTION          16,931          16,931
                   SUPPORT.
080               C-135................           4,414           4,414
081               F-15.................           1,122           1,122
082               F-16.................          10,994          10,994
083               F-22A................           5,929           5,929
084               OTHER AIRCRAFT.......              27              27
                  INDUSTRIAL
                   PREPAREDNESS
085               INDUSTRIAL                     21,363          21,363
                   RESPONSIVENESS.
                  WAR CONSUMABLES
086               WAR CONSUMABLES......          82,906          82,906
                  OTHER PRODUCTION
                   CHARGES
087               OTHER PRODUCTION            1,007,276       1,007,276
                   CHARGES.
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
087A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..          69,380          69,380
                       TOTAL AIRCRAFT        11,542,571      11,419,900
                       PROCUREMENT, AIR
                       FORCE.
 
                  MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
                   AIR FORCE
                  MISSILE REPLACEMENT
                   EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
001               MISSILE REPLACEMENT            80,187          80,187
                   EQ-BALLISTIC.
                  TACTICAL
003               JOINT AIR-SURFACE             337,438         337,438
                   STANDOFF MISSILE.
004               SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X)..         132,995         132,995
005               AMRAAM...............         329,600         329,600
006               PREDATOR HELLFIRE              33,878          33,878
                   MISSILE.
007               SMALL DIAMETER BOMB..          70,578          70,578
                  INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
008               INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/             749             749
                   POL PREVENTION.
                  CLASS IV
009               MM III MODIFICATIONS.          28,477          28,477
010               AGM-65D MAVERICK.....             276             276
011               AGM-88A HARM.........             297             297
012               AIR LAUNCH CRUISE              16,083          16,083
                   MISSILE (ALCM).
013               SMALL DIAMETER BOMB..           6,924           6,924
                  MISSILE SPARES AND
                   REPAIR PARTS
014               INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR          87,366          87,366
                   PARTS.
                  SPACE PROGRAMS
015               ADVANCED EHF.........         298,890         298,890
016               WIDEBAND GAPFILLER             38,971          35,971
                   SATELLITES(SPACE).
                      Unjustified                               [-3,000]
                      growth.
017               GPS III SPACE SEGMENT         235,397         235,397
018                  ADVANCE                     57,000          57,000
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
019               SPACEBORNE EQUIP               16,201          16,201
                   (COMSEC).
020               GLOBAL POSITIONING             52,090          52,090
                   (SPACE).
021               DEF METEOROLOGICAL             87,000          87,000
                   SAT PROG(SPACE).
022               EVOLVED EXPENDABLE            750,143         750,143
                   LAUNCH VEH
                   (INFRAST.).
023               EVOLVED EXPENDABLE            630,903         765,903
                   LAUNCH VEH(SPACE).
                      DMSP 20 launch/                          [135,000]
                      Additional
                      competition
                      launch.
024               SBIR HIGH (SPACE)....         450,884         450,884
                  SPECIAL PROGRAMS
028               SPECIAL UPDATE                 60,179          60,179
                   PROGRAMS.
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
028A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..         888,000         888,000
                       TOTAL MISSILE          4,690,506       4,822,506
                       PROCUREMENT, AIR
                       FORCE.
 
                  PROCUREMENT OF
                   AMMUNITION, AIR
                   FORCE
                  ROCKETS
001               ROCKETS..............           4,696           4,696
                  CARTRIDGES
002               CARTRIDGES...........         133,271         133,271
                  BOMBS
003               PRACTICE BOMBS.......          31,998          31,998

[[Page 8691]]

 
004               GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS         148,614         148,614
005               JOINT DIRECT ATTACK           101,400         101,400
                   MUNITION.
                  OTHER ITEMS
006               CAD/PAD..............          29,989          29,989
007               EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE              6,925           6,925
                   DISPOSAL (EOD).
008               SPARES AND REPAIR                 494             494
                   PARTS.
009               MODIFICATIONS........           1,610           1,610
010               ITEMS LESS THAN $5              4,237           4,237
                   MILLION.
                  FLARES
011               FLARES...............          86,101          86,101
                  FUZES
012               FUZES................         103,417         103,417
                  SMALL ARMS
013               SMALL ARMS...........          24,648          24,648
                       TOTAL                    677,400         677,400
                       PROCUREMENT OF
                       AMMUNITION, AIR
                       FORCE.
 
                  OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                   AIR FORCE
                  PASSENGER CARRYING
                   VEHICLES
001               PASSENGER CARRYING              6,528           2,528
                   VEHICLES.
                      Program reduction                         [-4,000]
                  CARGO AND UTILITY
                   VEHICLES
002               MEDIUM TACTICAL                 7,639           2,639
                   VEHICLE.
                      Program reduction                         [-5,000]
003               CAP VEHICLES.........             961             961
004               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             11,027           5,027
                   MILLION.
                      Program reduction                         [-6,000]
                  SPECIAL PURPOSE
                   VEHICLES
005               SECURITY AND TACTICAL           4,447           4,447
                   VEHICLES.
006               ITEMS LESS THAN $5                693             693
                   MILLION.
                  FIRE FIGHTING
                   EQUIPMENT
007               FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH            10,152          10,152
                   RESCUE VEHICLES.
                  MATERIALS HANDLING
                   EQUIPMENT
008               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             15,108           5,108
                   MILLION.
                      Program reduction                        [-10,000]
                  BASE MAINTENANCE
                   SUPPORT
009               RUNWAY SNOW REMOV &            10,212           6,212
                   CLEANING EQUIP.
                      Program reduction                         [-4,000]
010               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             57,049          32,049
                   MILLION.
                      Program reduction                        [-25,000]
                  COMM SECURITY
                   EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
011               COMSEC EQUIPMENT.....         106,182         106,182
012               MODIFICATIONS                   1,363           1,363
                   (COMSEC).
                  INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
013               INTELLIGENCE TRAINING           2,832           2,832
                   EQUIPMENT.
014               INTELLIGENCE COMM              32,329          32,329
                   EQUIPMENT.
016               MISSION PLANNING               15,649          15,649
                   SYSTEMS.
                  ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
017               AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL &          42,200          42,200
                   LANDING SYS.
018               NATIONAL AIRSPACE               6,333           6,333
                   SYSTEM.
019               BATTLE CONTROL                  2,708           2,708
                   SYSTEM--FIXED.
020               THEATER AIR CONTROL            50,033          40,033
                   SYS IMPROVEMENTS.
                      Program reduction                        [-10,000]
021               WEATHER OBSERVATION            16,348          16,348
                   FORECAST.
022               STRATEGIC COMMAND AND         139,984         139,984
                   CONTROL.
023               CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN              20,101          20,101
                   COMPLEX.
026               INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN           9,060           9,060
                   & ANALY NETWORK
                   (ISPAN).
                  SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS
                   PROJECTS
027               GENERAL INFORMATION            39,100          39,100
                   TECHNOLOGY.
028               AF GLOBAL COMMAND &            19,010          19,010
                   CONTROL SYS.
029               MOBILITY COMMAND AND           11,462          11,462
                   CONTROL.
030               AIR FORCE PHYSICAL             37,426          37,426
                   SECURITY SYSTEM.
031               COMBAT TRAINING                26,634          26,634
                   RANGES.
032               MINIMUM ESSENTIAL               1,289           1,289
                   EMERGENCY COMM N.
033               C3 COUNTERMEASURES...          11,508          11,508
034               GCSS-AF FOS..........           3,670           3,670
035               DEFENSE ENTERPRISE             15,298          15,298
                   ACCOUNTING AND MGMT
                   SYSTEM.
036               THEATER BATTLE MGT C2           9,565           9,565
                   SYSTEM.
037               AIR & SPACE                    25,772          25,772
                   OPERATIONS CTR-WPN
                   SYS.
                  AIR FORCE
                   COMMUNICATIONS
038               INFORMATION TRANSPORT          81,286         112,586
                   SYSTEMS.
                      Air Force                                 [31,300]
                      requested program
                      transfer from
                      AFNET.
039               AFNET................         122,228          90,928
                      Air Force                                [-31,300]
                      requested program
                      transfer to BITI.
041               USCENTCOM............          16,342          16,342
                  SPACE PROGRAMS
042               FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-         60,230          60,230
                   OF-SIGHT TERMINALS.
043               SPACE BASED IR SENSOR          26,100          26,100
                   PGM SPACE.
044               NAVSTAR GPS SPACE....           2,075           2,075
045               NUDET DETECTION SYS             4,656           4,656
                   SPACE.

[[Page 8692]]

 
046               AF SATELLITE CONTROL           54,630          54,630
                   NETWORK SPACE.
047               SPACELIFT RANGE                69,713          69,713
                   SYSTEM SPACE.
048               MILSATCOM SPACE......          41,355          41,355
049               SPACE MODS SPACE.....          31,722          31,722
050               COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM..          61,603          61,603
                  ORGANIZATION AND BASE
051               TACTICAL C-E                   50,335          50,335
                   EQUIPMENT.
053               RADIO EQUIPMENT......          14,846          14,846
054               CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL                3,635           3,635
                   EQUIPMENT.
055               BASE COMM                      79,607          79,607
                   INFRASTRUCTURE.
                  MODIFICATIONS
056               COMM ELECT MODS......         105,398         105,398
                  PERSONAL SAFETY &
                   RESCUE EQUIP
057               NIGHT VISION GOGGLES.          12,577          12,577
058               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             31,209          31,209
                   MILLION.
                  DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS
                   HANDLING EQ
059               MECHANIZED MATERIAL             7,670           7,670
                   HANDLING EQUIP.
                  BASE SUPPORT
                   EQUIPMENT
060               BASE PROCURED                  14,125          14,125
                   EQUIPMENT.
061               CONTINGENCY                    16,744          16,744
                   OPERATIONS.
062               PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL            2,495           2,495
                   INVESTMENT.
063               MOBILITY EQUIPMENT...          10,573          10,573
064               ITEMS LESS THAN $5              5,462           5,462
                   MILLION.
                  SPECIAL SUPPORT
                   PROJECTS
066               DARP RC135...........          24,710          24,710
067               DCGS-AF..............         206,743         206,743
069               SPECIAL UPDATE                537,370         537,370
                   PROGRAM.
070               DEFENSE SPACE                  77,898          77,898
                   RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
070A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..      13,990,196      13,990,196
                  SPARES AND REPAIR
                   PARTS
072               SPARES AND REPAIR              32,813          32,813
                   PARTS.
                       TOTAL OTHER           16,566,018      16,502,018
                       PROCUREMENT, AIR
                       FORCE.
 
                  PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
                   WIDE
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
001               ITEMS LESS THAN $5              1,594           1,594
                   MILLION.
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
002               MAJOR EQUIPMENT......           4,325           4,325
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
003               PERSONNEL                      17,268          17,268
                   ADMINISTRATION.
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
008               INFORMATION SYSTEMS            10,491          10,491
                   SECURITY.
010               TELEPORT PROGRAM.....          80,622          80,622
011               ITEMS LESS THAN $5             14,147          14,147
                   MILLION.
012               NET CENTRIC                     1,921           1,921
                   ENTERPRISE SERVICES
                   (NCES).
013               DEFENSE INFORMATION            80,144          80,144
                   SYSTEM NETWORK.
015               CYBER SECURITY                  8,755           8,755
                   INITIATIVE.
016               WHITE HOUSE                    33,737          33,737
                   COMMUNICATION AGENCY.
017               SENIOR LEADERSHIP              32,544          32,544
                   ENTERPRISE.
018               JOINT INFORMATION              13,300          13,300
                   ENVIRONMENT.
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
020               MAJOR EQUIPMENT......           7,436           7,436
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                   DMACT
021               MAJOR EQUIPMENT......          11,640          11,640
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                   DODEA
022               AUTOMATION/                     1,269           1,269
                   EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT
                   & LOGISTICS.
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
024               VEHICLES.............           1,500           1,500
025               MAJOR EQUIPMENT......           1,039           1,039
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                   DEFENSE THREAT
                   REDUCTION AGENCY
026               VEHICLES.............              50              50
027               OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT           7,639           7,639
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                   MISSILE DEFENSE
                   AGENCY
028                  ADVANCE                     68,880          68,880
                     PROCUREMENT (CY).
029               THAAD................         464,424         464,424
030               AEGIS BMD............         435,430         435,430
031               BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS.          48,140          48,140
032               AEGIS ASHORE PHASE            225,774         225,774
                   III.
034               IRON DOME............         175,972         351,972
                      Program increase                         [176,000]
                      for Iron Dome.
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
041               INFORMATION SYSTEMS             3,448           3,448
                   SECURITY PROGRAM
                   (ISSP).
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
042               MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD.          43,708          43,708
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
044               MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS.          10,783          10,783
                  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
046               MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS.          29,599          29,599

[[Page 8693]]

 
                  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
046A              CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..         540,894         540,894
                  AVIATION PROGRAMS
047               MC-12................          40,500          40,500
048               ROTARY WING UPGRADES          112,226         112,226
                   AND SUSTAINMENT.
049               MH-60 MODERNIZATION             3,021           3,021
                   PROGRAM.
050               NON-STANDARD AVIATION          48,200          48,200
052               MH-47 CHINOOK........          22,230          22,230
053               RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL           6,397           6,397
                   VEHICLE.
054               CV-22 MODIFICATION...          25,578          25,578
056               MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL           15,651          15,651
                   VEHICLE.
057               STUASL0..............           1,500           1,500
058               PRECISION STRIKE              145,929         145,929
                   PACKAGE.
059               AC/MC-130J...........          65,130          65,130
061               C-130 MODIFICATIONS..          39,563          39,563
                  SHIPBUILDING
063               UNDERWATER SYSTEMS...          25,459          25,459
                  AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
065               ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M..         144,336         144,336
                  OTHER PROCUREMENT
                   PROGRAMS
068               INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.          81,001          81,001
070               DISTRIBUTED COMMON             17,323          13,423
                   GROUND/SURFACE
                   SYSTEMS.
                      Reduction of PED                          [-3,900]
                      Ground Systems.
071               OTHER ITEMS <$5M.....          84,852          84,852
072               COMBATANT CRAFT                51,937          51,937
                   SYSTEMS.
074               SPECIAL PROGRAMS.....          31,017          31,017
075               TACTICAL VEHICLES....          63,134          63,134
076               WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M.         192,448         192,448
078               COMBAT MISSION                 19,984          19,984
                   REQUIREMENTS.
081               GLOBAL VIDEO                    5,044           5,044
                   SURVEILLANCE
                   ACTIVITIES.
082               OPERATIONAL                    38,126          38,126
                   ENHANCEMENTS
                   INTELLIGENCE.
088               OPERATIONAL                   243,849         243,849
                   ENHANCEMENTS.
                  CBDP
095               CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL           170,137         170,137
                   SITUATIONAL
                   AWARENESS.
096               CB PROTECTION &               150,392         150,392
                   HAZARD MITIGATION.
                       TOTAL                  4,221,437       4,393,537
                       PROCUREMENT,
                       DEFENSE-WIDE.
 
                  JOINT URGENT
                   OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                   FUND
001               JOINT URGENT                   20,000               0
                   OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                   FUND.
                      Unjustified                              [-20,000]
                      request.
                       TOTAL JOINT               20,000               0
                       URGENT
                       OPERATIONAL
                       NEEDS FUND.
 
                  PRIOR YEAR
                   RESCISSIONS
001               PRIOR YEAR                   -265,685               0
                   RESCISSIONS.
                      Denied Prior Year                        [265,685]
                      Rescission
                      request.
                       TOTAL PRIOR YEAR        -265,685               0
                       RESCISSIONS.
 
                  UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL
                   PROVISIONS
001               UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL                        -265,685
                   PROVISIONS.
                      Undistributed                           [-265,685]
                      FY15 reduction.
                       TOTAL                                   -265,685
                       UNDISTRIBUTED
                       GENERAL
                       PROVISIONS.
 
                       TOTAL                 89,508,034      90,983,703
                       PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

        TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

     SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (In Thousands of
                                Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Program                          FY 2015          House
  Line       Element           Item           Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          ARMY
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601101A        IN-HOUSE                 13,464          13,464
                          LABORATORY
                          INDEPENDENT
                          RESEARCH.
   002   0601102A        DEFENSE                 238,167         238,167
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
   003   0601103A        UNIVERSITY               69,808          69,808
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
   004   0601104A        UNIVERSITY AND          102,737         102,737
                          INDUSTRY
                          RESEARCH
                          CENTERS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             424,176         424,176
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   005   0602105A        MATERIALS                28,006          28,006
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   006   0602120A        SENSORS AND              33,515          33,515
                          ELECTRONIC
                          SURVIVABILITY.
   007   0602122A        TRACTOR HIP....          16,358          16,358
   008   0602211A        AVIATION                 63,433          63,433
                          TECHNOLOGY.

[[Page 8694]]

 
   009   0602270A        ELECTRONIC               18,502          18,502
                          WARFARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   010   0602303A        MISSILE                  46,194          46,194
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   011   0602307A        ADVANCED                 28,528          28,528
                          WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   012   0602308A        ADVANCED                 27,435          27,435
                          CONCEPTS AND
                          SIMULATION.
   013   0602601A        COMBAT VEHICLE           72,883          72,883
                          AND AUTOMOTIVE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   014   0602618A        BALLISTICS               85,597          85,597
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   015   0602622A        CHEMICAL, SMOKE           3,971           3,971
                          AND EQUIPMENT
                          DEFEATING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   016   0602623A        JOINT SERVICE             6,853           6,853
                          SMALL ARMS
                          PROGRAM.
   017   0602624A        WEAPONS AND              38,069          38,069
                          MUNITIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   018   0602705A        ELECTRONICS AND          56,435          56,435
                          ELECTRONIC
                          DEVICES.
   019   0602709A        NIGHT VISION             38,445          38,445
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   020   0602712A        COUNTERMINE              25,939          25,939
                          SYSTEMS.
   021   0602716A        HUMAN FACTORS            23,783          23,783
                          ENGINEERING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   022   0602720A        ENVIRONMENTAL            15,659          15,659
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   023   0602782A        COMMAND,                 33,817          33,817
                          CONTROL,
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   024   0602783A        COMPUTER AND             10,764          10,764
                          SOFTWARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   025   0602784A        MILITARY                 63,311          63,311
                          ENGINEERING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   026   0602785A        MANPOWER/                23,295          23,295
                          PERSONNEL/
                          TRAINING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   027   0602786A        WARFIGHTER               25,751          28,330
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............      Joint                               [2,579]
                             Service
                             Combat
                             Feeding
                             Technology.
   028   0602787A        MEDICAL                  76,068          76,068
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             862,611         865,190
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   029   0603001A        WARFIGHTER               65,139          65,813
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............      Joint                                 [674]
                             Service
                             Combat
                             Feeding
                             Tech Demo.
   030   0603002A        MEDICAL                  67,291          67,291
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   031   0603003A        AVIATION                 88,990          88,990
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   032   0603004A        WEAPONS AND              57,931          57,931
                          MUNITIONS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   033   0603005A        COMBAT VEHICLE          110,031         110,031
                          AND AUTOMOTIVE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   034   0603006A        SPACE                     6,883           6,883
                          APPLICATION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   035   0603007A        MANPOWER,                13,580          13,580
                          PERSONNEL AND
                          TRAINING
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   036   0603008A        ELECTRONIC               44,871          44,871
                          WARFARE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   037   0603009A        TRACTOR HIKE...           7,492           7,492
   038   0603015A        NEXT GENERATION          16,749          16,749
                          TRAINING &
                          SIMULATION
                          SYSTEMS.
   039   0603020A        TRACTOR ROSE...          14,483          14,483
   041   0603125A        COMBATING                24,270          24,270
                          TERRORISM--TEC
                          HNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   042   0603130A        TRACTOR NAIL...           3,440           3,440
   043   0603131A        TRACTOR EGGS...           2,406           2,406
   044   0603270A        ELECTRONIC               26,057          26,057
                          WARFARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   045   0603313A        MISSILE AND              44,957          44,957
                          ROCKET
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   046   0603322A        TRACTOR CAGE...          11,105          11,105
   047   0603461A        HIGH                    181,609         181,609
                          PERFORMANCE
                          COMPUTING
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   048   0603606A        LANDMINE                 13,074          13,074
                          WARFARE AND
                          BARRIER
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   049   0603607A        JOINT SERVICE             7,321           7,321
                          SMALL ARMS
                          PROGRAM.
   050   0603710A        NIGHT VISION             44,138          44,138
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   051   0603728A        ENVIRONMENTAL             9,197           9,197
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
   052   0603734A        MILITARY                 17,613          17,613
                          ENGINEERING
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   053   0603772A        ADVANCED                 39,164          39,164
                          TACTICAL
                          COMPUTER
                          SCIENCE AND
                          SENSOR
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             917,791         918,465
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          PROTOTYPES
   054   0603305A        ARMY MISSLE              12,797          12,797
                          DEFENSE
                          SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION.
   055   0603308A        ARMY SPACE               13,999          13,999
                          SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION.
   058   0603639A        TANK AND MEDIUM          29,334          29,334
                          CALIBER
                          AMMUNITION.
   060   0603747A        SOLDIER SUPPORT           9,602          11,189
                          AND
                          SURVIVABILITY.
         ..............      Food                                [1,587]
                             Advanced
                             Development.
   061   0603766A        TACTICAL                  8,953           8,953
                          ELECTRONIC
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM--ADV
                          DEV.
   062   0603774A        NIGHT VISION              3,052           3,052
                          SYSTEMS
                          ADVANCED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   063   0603779A        ENVIRONMENTAL             7,830           7,830
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY--DE
                          M/VAL.
   065   0603790A        NATO RESEARCH             2,954           2,954
                          AND
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   067   0603804A        LOGISTICS AND            13,386          13,386
                          ENGINEER
                          EQUIPMENT--ADV
                          DEV.
   069   0603807A        MEDICAL                  23,659          23,659
                          SYSTEMS--ADV
                          DEV.
   070   0603827A        SOLDIER                   6,830           9,830
                          SYSTEMS--ADVAN
                          CED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............      Army                                [3,000]
                             requested
                             realignment
                             -Caliber
                             Config
                             Study.
   072   0604100A        ANALYSIS OF               9,913           9,913
                          ALTERNATIVES.
   073   0604115A        TECHNOLOGY               74,740          74,740
                          MATURATION
                          INITIATIVES.
   074   0604120A        ASSURED                   9,930           9,930
                          POSITIONING,
                          NAVIGATION AND
                          TIMING (PNT).
   076   0604319A        INDIRECT FIRE            96,177          71,177
                          PROTECTION
                          CAPABILITY
                          INCREMENT 2-
                          INTERCEPT
                          (IFPC2).
         ..............      Schedule                          [-25,000]
                             delay.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             323,156         302,743
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            & PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          DEMONSTRATION
   079   0604201A        AIRCRAFT                 37,246          37,246
                          AVIONICS.
   081   0604270A        ELECTRONIC                6,002           6,002
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   082   0604280A        JOINT TACTICAL            9,832           9,832
                          RADIO.
   083   0604290A        MID-TIER                  9,730           9,730
                          NETWORKING
                          VEHICULAR
                          RADIO (MNVR).
   084   0604321A        ALL SOURCE                5,532           5,532
                          ANALYSIS
                          SYSTEM.
   085   0604328A        TRACTOR CAGE...          19,929          19,929

[[Page 8695]]

 
   086   0604601A        INFANTRY                 27,884          34,586
                          SUPPORT
                          WEAPONS.
         ..............      Army                                [6,702]
                             requested
                             realignment.
   087   0604604A        MEDIUM TACTICAL             210             210
                          VEHICLES.
   088   0604611A        JAVELIN........           4,166           4,166
   089   0604622A        FAMILY OF HEAVY          12,913          12,913
                          TACTICAL
                          VEHICLES.
   090   0604633A        AIR TRAFFIC              16,764          16,764
                          CONTROL.
   091   0604641A        TACTICAL                  6,770           6,770
                          UNMANNED
                          GROUND VEHICLE
                          (TUGV).
   092   0604710A        NIGHT VISION             65,333          65,333
                          SYSTEMS--ENG
                          DEV.
   093   0604713A        COMBAT FEEDING,           1,335           1,897
                          CLOTHING, AND
                          EQUIPMENT.
         ..............      Military                              [562]
                             Subsistence
                             Systems.
   094   0604715A        NON-SYSTEM                8,945           8,945
                          TRAINING
                          DEVICES--ENG
                          DEV.
   096   0604741A        AIR DEFENSE              15,906          15,906
                          COMMAND,
                          CONTROL AND
                          INTELLIGENCE--
                          ENG DEV.
   097   0604742A        CONSTRUCTIVE              4,394           4,394
                          SIMULATION
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   098   0604746A        AUTOMATIC TEST           11,084          11,084
                          EQUIPMENT
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   099   0604760A        DISTRIBUTIVE             10,027          10,027
                          INTERACTIVE
                          SIMULATIONS
                          (DIS)--ENG DEV.
   100   0604780A        COMBINED ARMS            42,430          42,430
                          TACTICAL
                          TRAINER (CATT)
                          CORE.
   101   0604798A        BRIGADE                 105,279         105,279
                          ANALYSIS,
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND EVALUATION.
   102   0604802A        WEAPONS AND              15,006          15,006
                          MUNITIONS--ENG
                          DEV.
   103   0604804A        LOGISTICS AND            24,581          24,581
                          ENGINEER
                          EQUIPMENT--ENG
                          DEV.
   104   0604805A        COMMAND,                  4,433           4,433
                          CONTROL,
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS--ENG
                          DEV.
   105   0604807A        MEDICAL                  30,397          30,397
                          MATERIEL/
                          MEDICAL
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          EQUIPMENT--ENG
                          DEV.
   106   0604808A        LANDMINE                 57,705          57,705
                          WARFARE/
                          BARRIER--ENG
                          DEV.
   108   0604818A        ARMY TACTICAL            29,683          29,683
                          COMMAND &
                          CONTROL
                          HARDWARE &
                          SOFTWARE.
   109   0604820A        RADAR                     5,224           5,224
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   111   0604823A        FIREFINDER.....          37,492          37,492
   112   0604827A        SOLDIER                   6,157           6,157
                          SYSTEMS--WARRI
                          OR DEM/VAL.
   113   0604854A        ARTILLERY                 1,912           1,912
                          SYSTEMS--EMD.
   116   0605013A        INFORMATION              69,761          69,761
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   117   0605018A        INTEGRATED              138,465         138,465
                          PERSONNEL AND
                          PAY SYSTEM-
                          ARMY (IPPS-A).
   118   0605028A        ARMORED MULTI-           92,353          92,353
                          PURPOSE
                          VEHICLE (AMPV).
   119   0605030A        JOINT TACTICAL            8,440           8,440
                          NETWORK CENTER
                          (JTNC).
   120   0605031A        JOINT TACTICAL           17,999          17,999
                          NETWORK (JTN).
   121   0605035A        COMMON INFRARED         145,409         145,409
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S (CIRCM).
   122   0605350A        WIN-T INCREMENT         113,210         113,210
                          3--FULL
                          NETWORKING.
   123   0605380A        AMF JOINT                 6,882           6,882
                          TACTICAL RADIO
                          SYSTEM (JTRS).
   124   0605450A        JOINT AIR-TO-            83,838          83,838
                          GROUND MISSILE
                          (JAGM).
   125   0605456A        PAC-3/MSE                35,009          35,009
                          MISSILE.
   126   0605457A        ARMY INTEGRATED         142,584         142,584
                          AIR AND
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          (AIAMD).
   127   0605625A        MANNED GROUND            49,160          49,160
                          VEHICLE.
   128   0605626A        AERIAL COMMON            17,748          17,748
                          SENSOR.
   129   0605766A        NATIONAL                 15,212          15,212
                          CAPABILITIES
                          INTEGRATION
                          (MIP).
   130   0605812A        JOINT LIGHT              45,718          45,718
                          TACTICAL
                          VEHICLE (JLTV)
                          ENGINEERING
                          AND
                          MANUFACTURING
                          DEVELOPMENT PH.
   131   0605830A        AVIATION GROUND          10,041          10,041
                          SUPPORT
                          EQUIPMENT.
   132   0210609A        PALADIN                  83,300          83,300
                          INTEGRATED
                          MANAGEMENT
                          (PIM).
   133   0303032A        TROJAN--RH12...             983             983
   134   0304270A        ELECTRONIC                8,961           8,961
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,719,374       1,726,638
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            &
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  RDT&E
                          MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   135   0604256A        THREAT                   18,062          18,062
                          SIMULATOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   136   0604258A        TARGET SYSTEMS           10,040          10,040
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   137   0604759A        MAJOR T&E                60,317          60,317
                          INVESTMENT.
   138   0605103A        RAND ARROYO              20,612          20,612
                          CENTER.
   139   0605301A        ARMY KWAJALEIN          176,041         176,041
                          ATOLL.
   140   0605326A        CONCEPTS                 19,439          19,439
                          EXPERIMENTATIO
                          N PROGRAM.
   142   0605601A        ARMY TEST               275,025         275,025
                          RANGES AND
                          FACILITIES.
   143   0605602A        ARMY TECHNICAL           45,596          45,596
                          TEST
                          INSTRUMENTATIO
                          N AND TARGETS.
   144   0605604A        SURVIVABILITY/           33,295          33,295
                          LETHALITY
                          ANALYSIS.
   145   0605606A        AIRCRAFT                  4,700           4,700
                          CERTIFICATION.
   146   0605702A        METEOROLOGICAL            6,413           6,413
                          SUPPORT TO
                          RDT&E
                          ACTIVITIES.
   147   0605706A        MATERIEL                 20,746          20,746
                          SYSTEMS
                          ANALYSIS.
   148   0605709A        EXPLOITATION OF           7,015           7,015
                          FOREIGN ITEMS.
   149   0605712A        SUPPORT OF               49,221          49,221
                          OPERATIONAL
                          TESTING.
   150   0605716A        ARMY EVALUATION          55,039          55,039
                          CENTER.
   151   0605718A        ARMY MODELING &           1,125           1,125
                          SIM X-CMD
                          COLLABORATION
                          & INTEG.
   152   0605801A        PROGRAMWIDE              64,169          64,169
                          ACTIVITIES.
   153   0605803A        TECHNICAL                32,319          32,319
                          INFORMATION
                          ACTIVITIES.
   154   0605805A        MUNITIONS                49,052          49,052
                          STANDARDIZATIO
                          N,
                          EFFECTIVENESS
                          AND SAFETY.
   155   0605857A        ENVIRONMENTAL             2,612           2,612
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          MGMT SUPPORT.
   156   0605898A        MANAGEMENT HQ--          49,592          49,592
                          R&D.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,000,430       1,000,430
                            RDT&E
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
   158   0603778A        MLRS PRODUCT             17,112          17,112
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   159   0607141A        LOGISTICS                 3,654           3,654
                          AUTOMATION.
   160   0607664A        BIOMETRIC                 1,332           1,332
                          ENABLING
                          CAPABILITY
                          (BEC).
   161   0607865A        PATRIOT PRODUCT         152,991         152,991
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   162   0102419A        AEROSTAT JOINT           54,076          29,076
                          PROJECT OFFICE.

[[Page 8696]]

 
         ..............      Unobligated                       [-25,000]
                             balances.
   163   0203726A        ADV FIELD                22,374          22,374
                          ARTILLERY
                          TACTICAL DATA
                          SYSTEM.
   164   0203728A        JOINT AUTOMATED          24,371          24,371
                          DEEP OPERATION
                          COORDINATION
                          SYSTEM
                          (JADOCS).
   165   0203735A        COMBAT VEHICLE          295,177         321,177
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Stryker ECP                        [26,000]
                             risk
                             mitigation.
   166   0203740A        MANEUVER                 45,092          45,092
                          CONTROL SYSTEM.
   167   0203744A        AIRCRAFT                264,887         264,887
                          MODIFICATIONS/
                          PRODUCT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAMS.
   168   0203752A        AIRCRAFT ENGINE             381             381
                          COMPONENT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   169   0203758A        DIGITIZATION...          10,912          10,912
   170   0203801A        MISSILE/AIR               5,115           5,115
                          DEFENSE
                          PRODUCT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   171   0203802A        OTHER MISSILE            49,848          44,848
                          PRODUCT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Contract                           [-5,000]
                             delay for
                             ATACMS.
   172   0203808A        TRACTOR CARD...          22,691          22,691
   173   0205402A        INTEGRATED BASE           4,364           4,364
                          DEFENSE--OPERA
                          TIONAL SYSTEM
                          DEV.
   174   0205410A        MATERIALS                   834             834
                          HANDLING
                          EQUIPMENT.
   175   0205412A        ENVIRONMENTAL               280             280
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY--OP
                          ERATIONAL
                          SYSTEM DEV.
   176   0205456A        LOWER TIER AIR           78,758          78,758
                          AND MISSILE
                          DEFENSE (AMD)
                          SYSTEM.
   177   0205778A        GUIDED MULTIPLE-         45,377          45,377
                          LAUNCH ROCKET
                          SYSTEM (GMLRS).
   178   0208053A        JOINT TACTICAL           10,209          10,209
                          GROUND SYSTEM.
   181   0303028A        SECURITY AND             12,525          12,525
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   182   0303140A        INFORMATION              14,175          14,175
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   183   0303141A        GLOBAL COMBAT             4,527           4,527
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   184   0303142A        SATCOM GROUND            11,011          11,011
                          ENVIRONMENT
                          (SPACE).
   185   0303150A        WWMCCS/GLOBAL             2,151           2,151
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM.
   187   0305204A        TACTICAL                 22,870          22,870
                          UNMANNED
                          AERIAL
                          VEHICLES.
   188   0305208A        DISTRIBUTED              20,155          20,155
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   189   0305219A        MQ-1C GRAY               46,472          46,472
                          EAGLE UAS.
   191   0305233A        RQ-7 UAV.......          16,389          16,389
   192   0307665A        BIOMETRICS                1,974           1,974
                          ENABLED
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   193   0310349A        WIN-T INCREMENT           3,249           3,249
                          2--INITIAL
                          NETWORKING.
   194   0708045A        END ITEM                 76,225          76,225
                          INDUSTRIAL
                          PREPAREDNESS
                          ACTIVITIES.
  194A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED                4,802           4,802
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,346,360       1,342,360
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL            6,593,898       6,580,002
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, ARMY.
         ..............
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          NAVY
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601103N        UNIVERSITY              113,908         118,908
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
         ..............      DURIP                               [5,000]
                             program
                             increase.
   002   0601152N        IN-HOUSE                 18,734          18,734
                          LABORATORY
                          INDEPENDENT
                          RESEARCH.
   003   0601153N        DEFENSE                 443,697         443,697
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             576,339         581,339
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   004   0602114N        POWER                    95,753          95,753
                          PROJECTION
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   005   0602123N        FORCE                   139,496         139,496
                          PROTECTION
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   006   0602131M        MARINE CORPS             45,831          45,831
                          LANDING FORCE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   007   0602235N        COMMON PICTURE           43,541          43,541
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   008   0602236N        WARFIGHTER               46,923          46,923
                          SUSTAINMENT
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   009   0602271N        ELECTROMAGNETIC         107,872         107,872
                          SYSTEMS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   010   0602435N        OCEAN                    45,388          65,388
                          WARFIGHTING
                          ENVIRONMENT
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
         ..............      Service                            [20,000]
                             Life
                             extension
                             for the
                             AGOR ships.
   011   0602651M        JOINT NON-                5,887           5,887
                          LETHAL WEAPONS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   012   0602747N        UNDERSEA                 86,880          86,880
                          WARFARE
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   013   0602750N        FUTURE NAVAL            170,786         170,786
                          CAPABILITIES
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   014   0602782N        MINE AND                 32,526          32,526
                          EXPEDITIONARY
                          WARFARE
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             820,883         840,883
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   015   0603114N        POWER                    37,734          37,734
                          PROJECTION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   016   0603123N        FORCE                    25,831          25,831
                          PROTECTION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   017   0603271N        ELECTROMAGNETIC          64,623          64,623
                          SYSTEMS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   018   0603640M        USMC ADVANCED           128,397         128,397
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATION
                          (ATD).
   019   0603651M        JOINT NON-               11,506          11,506
                          LETHAL WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   020   0603673N        FUTURE NAVAL            256,144         256,144
                          CAPABILITIES
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   021   0603729N        WARFIGHTER                4,838           4,838
                          PROTECTION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   022   0603747N        UNDERSEA                  9,985           9,985
                          WARFARE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   023   0603758N        NAVY                     53,956          53,956
                          WARFIGHTING
                          EXPERIMENTS
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
   024   0603782N        MINE AND                  2,000           2,000
                          EXPEDITIONARY
                          WARFARE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             595,014         595,014
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          PROTOTYPES
   025   0603207N        AIR/OCEAN                40,429          40,429
                          TACTICAL
                          APPLICATIONS.
   026   0603216N        AVIATION                  4,325           4,325
                          SURVIVABILITY.
   027   0603237N        DEPLOYABLE                2,991           2,991
                          JOINT COMMAND
                          AND CONTROL.
   028   0603251N        AIRCRAFT                 12,651          12,651
                          SYSTEMS.
   029   0603254N        ASW SYSTEMS               7,782           7,782
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   030   0603261N        TACTICAL                  5,275           5,275
                          AIRBORNE
                          RECONNAISSANCE.

[[Page 8697]]

 
   031   0603382N        ADVANCED COMBAT           1,646           1,646
                          SYSTEMS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   032   0603502N        SURFACE AND             100,349         100,349
                          SHALLOW WATER
                          MINE
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S.
   033   0603506N        SURFACE SHIP             52,781          52,781
                          TORPEDO
                          DEFENSE.
   034   0603512N        CARRIER SYSTEMS           5,959           5,959
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   035   0603525N        PILOT FISH.....         148,865         148,865
   036   0603527N        RETRACT LARCH..          25,365          25,365
   037   0603536N        RETRACT JUNIPER          80,477          80,477
   038   0603542N        RADIOLOGICAL                669             669
                          CONTROL.
   039   0603553N        SURFACE ASW....           1,060           1,060
   040   0603561N        ADVANCED                 70,551          70,551
                          SUBMARINE
                          SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   041   0603562N        SUBMARINE                 8,044           8,044
                          TACTICAL
                          WARFARE
                          SYSTEMS.
   042   0603563N        SHIP CONCEPT             17,864          17,864
                          ADVANCED
                          DESIGN.
   043   0603564N        SHIP                     23,716          23,716
                          PRELIMINARY
                          DESIGN &
                          FEASIBILITY
                          STUDIES.
   044   0603570N        ADVANCED                499,961         499,961
                          NUCLEAR POWER
                          SYSTEMS.
   045   0603573N        ADVANCED                 21,026          21,026
                          SURFACE
                          MACHINERY
                          SYSTEMS.
   046   0603576N        CHALK EAGLE....         542,700         542,700
   047   0603581N        LITTORAL COMBAT          88,734          88,734
                          SHIP (LCS).
   048   0603582N        COMBAT SYSTEM            20,881          20,881
                          INTEGRATION.
   049   0603595N        OHIO                    849,277         849,277
                          REPLACEMENT.
   050   0603596N        LCS MISSION             196,948         196,948
                          MODULES.
   051   0603597N        AUTOMATED TEST            8,115           8,115
                          AND RE-TEST
                          (ATRT).
   052   0603609N        CONVENTIONAL              7,603           7,603
                          MUNITIONS.
   053   0603611M        MARINE CORPS            105,749         190,849
                          ASSAULT
                          VEHICLES.
         ..............      Acceleratio                        [85,100]
                             n of the
                             ACV
                             Increment
                             1.1 Program.
   054   0603635M        MARINE CORPS              1,342           1,342
                          GROUND COMBAT/
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   055   0603654N        JOINT SERVICE            21,399          21,399
                          EXPLOSIVE
                          ORDNANCE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   056   0603658N        COOPERATIVE              43,578          43,578
                          ENGAGEMENT.
   057   0603713N        OCEAN                     7,764           7,764
                          ENGINEERING
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   058   0603721N        ENVIRONMENTAL            13,200          13,200
                          PROTECTION.
   059   0603724N        NAVY ENERGY              69,415          69,415
                          PROGRAM.
   060   0603725N        FACILITIES                2,588           2,588
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   061   0603734N        CHALK CORAL....         176,301         176,301
   062   0603739N        NAVY LOGISTIC             3,873           3,873
                          PRODUCTIVITY.
   063   0603746N        RETRACT MAPLE..         376,028         376,028
   064   0603748N        LINK PLUMERIA..         272,096         272,096
   065   0603751N        RETRACT ELM....          42,233          42,233
   066   0603764N        LINK EVERGREEN.          46,504          46,504
   067   0603787N        SPECIAL                  25,109          25,109
                          PROCESSES.
   068   0603790N        NATO RESEARCH             9,659           9,659
                          AND
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   069   0603795N        LAND ATTACK                 318             318
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   070   0603851M        JOINT NON-               40,912          40,912
                          LETHAL WEAPONS
                          TESTING.
   071   0603860N        JOINT PRECISION          54,896          27,896
                          APPROACH AND
                          LANDING
                          SYSTEMS--DEM/
                          VAL.
         ..............      Program                           [-27,000]
                             delay.
   073   0603925N        DIRECTED ENERGY          58,696          58,696
                          AND ELECTRIC
                          WEAPON SYSTEMS.
   074   0604112N        GERALD R. FORD           43,613          43,613
                          CLASS NUCLEAR
                          AIRCRAFT
                          CARRIER (CVN
                          78--80).
   075   0604122N        REMOTE                   21,110          21,110
                          MINEHUNTING
                          SYSTEM (RMS).
   076   0604272N        TACTICAL AIR              5,657           5,657
                          DIRECTIONAL
                          INFRARED
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S (TADIRCM).
   077   0604279N        ASE SELF-                 8,033           8,033
                          PROTECTION
                          OPTIMIZATION.
   078   0604454N        LX (R).........          36,859          36,859
   079   0604653N        JOINT COUNTER            15,227          15,227
                          RADIO
                          CONTROLLED IED
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE
                          (JCREW).
   081   0604707N        SPACE AND                22,393          22,393
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE (SEW)
                          ARCHITECTURE/
                          ENGINEERING
                          SUPPORT.
   082   0604786N        OFFENSIVE ANTI-         202,939         202,939
                          SURFACE
                          WARFARE WEAPON
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   083   0605812M        JOINT LIGHT              11,450          11,450
                          TACTICAL
                          VEHICLE (JLTV)
                          ENGINEERING
                          AND
                          MANUFACTURING
                          DEVELOPMENT PH.
   084   0303354N        ASW SYSTEMS               6,495           6,495
                          DEVELOPMENT--M
                          IP.
   085   0304270N        ELECTRONIC                  332             332
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT--M
                          IP.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           4,591,812       4,649,912
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            & PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          DEMONSTRATION
   086   0603208N        TRAINING SYSTEM          25,153          25,153
                          AIRCRAFT.
   087   0604212N        OTHER HELO               46,154          46,154
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   088   0604214N        AV-8B AIRCRAFT--         25,372          25,372
                          ENG DEV.
   089   0604215N        STANDARDS                53,712          53,712
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   090   0604216N        MULTI-MISSION            11,434          11,434
                          HELICOPTER
                          UPGRADE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   091   0604218N        AIR/OCEAN                 2,164           2,164
                          EQUIPMENT
                          ENGINEERING.
   092   0604221N        P-3                       1,710           1,710
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   093   0604230N        WARFARE SUPPORT           9,094           9,094
                          SYSTEM.
   094   0604231N        TACTICAL                 70,248          70,248
                          COMMAND SYSTEM.
   095   0604234N        ADVANCED                193,200         193,200
                          HAWKEYE.
   096   0604245N        H-1 UPGRADES...          44,115          44,115
   097   0604261N        ACOUSTIC SEARCH          23,227          23,227
                          SENSORS.
   098   0604262N        V-22A..........          61,249          61,249
   099   0604264N        AIR CREW                 15,014          15,014
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   100   0604269N        EA-18..........          18,730          18,730
   101   0604270N        ELECTRONIC               28,742          28,742
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   102   0604273N        EXECUTIVE HELO          388,086         388,086
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   103   0604274N        NEXT GENERATION         246,856         246,856
                          JAMMER (NGJ).
   104   0604280N        JOINT TACTICAL            7,106           7,106
                          RADIO SYSTEM--
                          NAVY (JTRS-
                          NAVY).
   105   0604307N        SURFACE                 189,112         189,112
                          COMBATANT
                          COMBAT SYSTEM
                          ENGINEERING.

[[Page 8698]]

 
   106   0604311N        LPD-17 CLASS                376             376
                          SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION.
   107   0604329N        SMALL DIAMETER           71,849          71,849
                          BOMB (SDB).
   108   0604366N        STANDARD                 53,198          53,198
                          MISSILE
                          IMPROVEMENTS.
   109   0604373N        AIRBORNE MCM...          38,941          38,941
   110   0604376M        MARINE AIR                7,832           7,832
                          GROUND TASK
                          FORCE (MAGTF)
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE (EW)
                          FOR AVIATION.
   111   0604378N        NAVAL                    15,263          15,263
                          INTEGRATED
                          FIRE CONTROL--
                          COUNTER AIR
                          SYSTEMS
                          ENGINEERING.
   112   0604404N        UNMANNED                403,017         200,017
                          CARRIER
                          LAUNCHED
                          AIRBORNE
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          AND STRIKE
                          (UCLASS)
                          SYSTEM.
         ..............      Program                          [-203,000]
                             delay.
   113   0604501N        ADVANCED ABOVE           20,409          20,409
                          WATER SENSORS.
   114   0604503N        SSN-688 AND              71,565          71,565
                          TRIDENT
                          MODERNIZATION.
   115   0604504N        AIR CONTROL....          29,037          29,037
   116   0604512N        SHIPBOARD               122,083         122,083
                          AVIATION
                          SYSTEMS.
   118   0604522N        ADVANCED                144,706         144,706
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE RADAR
                          (AMDR) SYSTEM.
   119   0604558N        NEW DESIGN SSN.          72,695          72,695
   120   0604562N        SUBMARINE                38,985          38,985
                          TACTICAL
                          WARFARE SYSTEM.
   121   0604567N        SHIP CONTRACT            48,470          48,470
                          DESIGN/ LIVE
                          FIRE T&E.
   122   0604574N        NAVY TACTICAL             3,935           3,935
                          COMPUTER
                          RESOURCES.
   123   0604580N        VIRGINIA                132,602         132,602
                          PAYLOAD MODULE
                          (VPM).
   124   0604601N        MINE                     19,067          19,067
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   125   0604610N        LIGHTWEIGHT              25,280          25,280
                          TORPEDO
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   126   0604654N        JOINT SERVICE             8,985           8,985
                          EXPLOSIVE
                          ORDNANCE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   127   0604703N        PERSONNEL,                7,669           7,669
                          TRAINING,
                          SIMULATION,
                          AND HUMAN
                          FACTORS.
   128   0604727N        JOINT STANDOFF            4,400           4,400
                          WEAPON SYSTEMS.
   129   0604755N        SHIP SELF                56,889          56,889
                          DEFENSE
                          (DETECT &
                          CONTROL).
   130   0604756N        SHIP SELF                96,937          96,937
                          DEFENSE
                          (ENGAGE: HARD
                          KILL).
   131   0604757N        SHIP SELF               134,564         134,564
                          DEFENSE
                          (ENGAGE: SOFT
                          KILL/EW).
   132   0604761N        INTELLIGENCE                200             200
                          ENGINEERING.
   133   0604771N        MEDICAL                   8,287           8,287
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   134   0604777N        NAVIGATION/ID            29,504          29,504
                          SYSTEM.
   135   0604800M        JOINT STRIKE            513,021         513,021
                          FIGHTER (JSF)--
                          EMD.
   136   0604800N        JOINT STRIKE            516,456         516,456
                          FIGHTER (JSF)--
                          EMD.
   137   0605013M        INFORMATION               2,887           2,887
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   138   0605013N        INFORMATION              66,317          66,317
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   139   0605212N        CH-53K RDTE....         573,187         573,187
   140   0605220N        SHIP TO SHORE            67,815          67,815
                          CONNECTOR
                          (SSC).
   141   0605450N        JOINT AIR-TO-             6,300           6,300
                          GROUND MISSILE
                          (JAGM).
   142   0605500N        MULTI-MISSION           308,037         323,037
                          MARITIME
                          AIRCRAFT (MMA).
         ..............      Wideband                           [15,000]
                             Communicati
                             on
                             Development.
   143   0204202N        DDG-1000.......         202,522         202,522
   144   0304231N        TACTICAL                  1,011           1,011
                          COMMAND
                          SYSTEM--MIP.
   145   0304785N        TACTICAL                 10,357          10,357
                          CRYPTOLOGIC
                          SYSTEMS.
   146   0305124N        SPECIAL                  23,975          23,975
                          APPLICATIONS
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           5,419,108       5,231,108
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            &
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   147   0604256N        THREAT                   45,272          45,272
                          SIMULATOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   148   0604258N        TARGET SYSTEMS           79,718          79,718
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   149   0604759N        MAJOR T&E               123,993         123,993
                          INVESTMENT.
   150   0605126N        JOINT THEATER             4,960           4,960
                          AIR AND
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          ORGANIZATION.
   151   0605152N        STUDIES AND               8,296           8,296
                          ANALYSIS
                          SUPPORT--NAVY.
   152   0605154N        CENTER FOR               45,752          45,752
                          NAVAL ANALYSES.
   154   0605804N        TECHNICAL                   876             876
                          INFORMATION
                          SERVICES.
   155   0605853N        MANAGEMENT,              72,070          72,070
                          TECHNICAL &
                          INTERNATIONAL
                          SUPPORT.
   156   0605856N        STRATEGIC                 3,237           3,237
                          TECHNICAL
                          SUPPORT.
   157   0605861N        RDT&E SCIENCE            73,033          73,033
                          AND TECHNOLOGY
                          MANAGEMENT.
   158   0605863N        RDT&E SHIP AND          138,304         138,304
                          AIRCRAFT
                          SUPPORT.
   159   0605864N        TEST AND                336,286         336,286
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   160   0605865N        OPERATIONAL              16,658          16,658
                          TEST AND
                          EVALUATION
                          CAPABILITY.
   161   0605866N        NAVY SPACE AND            2,505           2,505
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE (SEW)
                          SUPPORT.
   162   0605867N        SEW                       8,325           8,325
                          SURVEILLANCE/
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SUPPORT.
   163   0605873M        MARINE CORPS             17,866          17,866
                          PROGRAM WIDE
                          SUPPORT.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             977,151         977,151
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
   168   0604402N        UNMANNED COMBAT          35,949          35,949
                          AIR VEHICLE
                          (UCAV)
                          ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT AND
                          PROTOTYPE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   169   0604766M        MARINE CORPS                215             215
                          DATA SYSTEMS.
   170   0605525N        CARRIER ONBOARD           8,873           8,873
                          DELIVERY (COD)
                          FOLLOW ON.
   172   0101221N        STRATEGIC SUB &          96,943          96,943
                          WEAPONS SYSTEM
                          SUPPORT.
   173   0101224N        SSBN SECURITY            30,057          30,057
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
   174   0101226N        SUBMARINE                 4,509           4,509
                          ACOUSTIC
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   175   0101402N        NAVY STRATEGIC           13,676          13,676
                          COMMUNICATIONS.
   176   0203761N        RAPID                    12,480          12,480
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          TRANSITION
                          (RTT).
   177   0204136N        F/A-18                   76,216          76,216
                          SQUADRONS.
   179   0204163N        FLEET                    27,281          27,281
                          TELECOMMUNICAT
                          IONS
                          (TACTICAL).
   180   0204228N        SURFACE SUPPORT           2,878           2,878
   181   0204229N        TOMAHAWK AND             32,385          32,385
                          TOMAHAWK
                          MISSION
                          PLANNING
                          CENTER (TMPC).
   182   0204311N        INTEGRATED               39,371          39,371
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM.

[[Page 8699]]

 
   183   0204413N        AMPHIBIOUS                4,609           4,609
                          TACTICAL
                          SUPPORT UNITS
                          (DISPLACEMENT
                          CRAFT).
   184   0204460M        GROUND/AIR TASK          99,106          89,106
                          ORIENTED RADAR
                          (G/ATOR).
         ..............      Unjustified                       [-10,000]
                             cost growth.
   185   0204571N        CONSOLIDATED             39,922          39,922
                          TRAINING
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   186   0204574N        CRYPTOLOGIC               1,157           1,157
                          DIRECT SUPPORT.
   187   0204575N        ELECTRONIC               22,067          22,067
                          WARFARE (EW)
                          READINESS
                          SUPPORT.
   188   0205601N        HARM                     17,420          17,420
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   189   0205604N        TACTICAL DATA           151,208         151,208
                          LINKS.
   190   0205620N        SURFACE ASW              26,366          26,366
                          COMBAT SYSTEM
                          INTEGRATION.
   191   0205632N        MK-48 ADCAP....          25,952          25,952
   192   0205633N        AVIATION                106,936         106,936
                          IMPROVEMENTS.
   194   0205675N        OPERATIONAL             104,023         104,023
                          NUCLEAR POWER
                          SYSTEMS.
   195   0206313M        MARINE CORPS             77,398          77,398
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS.
   196   0206335M        COMMON AVIATION          32,495          32,495
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM
                          (CAC2S).
   197   0206623M        MARINE CORPS            156,626         156,626
                          GROUND COMBAT/
                          SUPPORTING
                          ARMS SYSTEMS.
   198   0206624M        MARINE CORPS             20,999          20,999
                          COMBAT
                          SERVICES
                          SUPPORT.
   199   0206625M        USMC                     14,179          14,179
                          INTELLIGENCE/
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE
                          SYSTEMS (MIP).
   200   0207161N        TACTICAL AIM             47,258          47,258
                          MISSILES.
   201   0207163N        ADVANCED MEDIUM          10,210          10,210
                          RANGE AIR-TO-
                          AIR MISSILE
                          (AMRAAM).
   206   0303109N        SATELLITE                41,829          41,829
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          (SPACE).
   207   0303138N        CONSOLIDATED             22,780          22,780
                          AFLOAT NETWORK
                          ENTERPRISE
                          SERVICES
                          (CANES).
   208   0303140N        INFORMATION              23,053          23,053
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   209   0303150M        WWMCCS/GLOBAL               296             296
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM.
   212   0305160N        NAVY                        359             359
                          METEOROLOGICAL
                          AND OCEAN
                          SENSORS-SPACE
                          (METOC).
   213   0305192N        MILITARY                  6,166           6,166
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          PROGRAM (MIP)
                          ACTIVITIES.
   214   0305204N        TACTICAL                  8,505           8,505
                          UNMANNED
                          AERIAL
                          VEHICLES.
   216   0305208M        DISTRIBUTED              11,613          11,613
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   217   0305208N        DISTRIBUTED              18,146          18,146
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   218   0305220N        RQ-4 UAV.......         498,003         530,403
         ..............      Triton                             [32,400]
                             Sensor
                             Development
                             Acceleratio
                             n.
   219   0305231N        MQ-8 UAV.......          47,294          47,294
   220   0305232M        RQ-11 UAV......             718             718
   221   0305233N        RQ-7 UAV.......             851             851
   222   0305234N        SMALL (LEVEL 0)           4,813           4,813
                          TACTICAL UAS
                          (STUASL0).
   223   0305239M        RQ-21A.........           8,192           8,192
   224   0305241N        MULTI-                   22,559          22,559
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SENSOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   225   0305242M        UNMANNED AERIAL           2,000           2,000
                          SYSTEMS (UAS)
                          PAYLOADS (MIP).
   226   0308601N        MODELING AND              4,719           4,719
                          SIMULATION
                          SUPPORT.
   227   0702207N        DEPOT                    21,168          21,168
                          MAINTENANCE
                          (NON-IF).
   228   0708011N        INDUSTRIAL               37,169          37,169
                          PREPAREDNESS.
   229   0708730N        MARITIME                  4,347           4,347
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (MARITECH).
  229A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED            1,162,684       1,162,684
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           3,286,028       3,308,428
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           16,266,335      16,183,835
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, NAVY.
         ..............
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          AF
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601102F        DEFENSE                 314,482         314,482
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
   002   0601103F        UNIVERSITY              127,079         127,079
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
   003   0601108F        HIGH ENERGY              12,929          12,929
                          LASER RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             454,490         454,490
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   004   0602102F        MATERIALS......         105,680         105,680
   005   0602201F        AEROSPACE               105,747         105,747
                          VEHICLE
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   006   0602202F        HUMAN                    81,957          81,957
                          EFFECTIVENESS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   007   0602203F        AEROSPACE               172,550         369,550
                          PROPULSION.
         ..............      RD-180                            [220,000]
                             replacement.
         ..............      Reduction                         [-23,000]
                             for liquid
                             engine
                             combustion
                             technologie
                             s and
                             advanced
                             liquid
                             engine
                             technologie
                             s.
   008   0602204F        AEROSPACE               118,343         118,343
                          SENSORS.
   009   0602601F        SPACE                    98,229          98,229
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   010   0602602F        CONVENTIONAL             87,387          87,387
                          MUNITIONS.
   011   0602605F        DIRECTED ENERGY         125,955         125,955
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   012   0602788F        DOMINANT                147,789         147,789
                          INFORMATION
                          SCIENCES AND
                          METHODS.
   013   0602890F        HIGH ENERGY              37,496          37,496
                          LASER RESEARCH.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,081,133       1,278,133
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   014   0603112F        ADVANCED                 32,177          42,177
                          MATERIALS FOR
                          WEAPON SYSTEMS.
         ..............      Metals                             [10,000]
                             Affordabili
                             ty
                             Initiative.
   015   0603199F        SUSTAINMENT              15,800          15,800
                          SCIENCE AND
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (S&T).
   016   0603203F        ADVANCED                 34,420          34,420
                          AEROSPACE
                          SENSORS.
   017   0603211F        AEROSPACE                91,062          91,062
                          TECHNOLOGY DEV/
                          DEMO.
   018   0603216F        AEROSPACE               124,236         124,236
                          PROPULSION AND
                          POWER
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   019   0603270F        ELECTRONIC               47,602          47,602
                          COMBAT
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   020   0603401F        ADVANCED                 69,026          69,026
                          SPACECRAFT
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   021   0603444F        MAUI SPACE               14,031          14,031
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM (MSSS).
   022   0603456F        HUMAN                    21,788          21,788
                          EFFECTIVENESS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.

[[Page 8700]]

 
   023   0603601F        CONVENTIONAL             42,046          42,046
                          WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   024   0603605F        ADVANCED                 23,542          33,542
                          WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............      Program                            [10,000]
                             increase.
   025   0603680F        MANUFACTURING            42,772          42,772
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
   026   0603788F        BATTLESPACE              35,315          35,315
                          KNOWLEDGE
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATION.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             593,817         613,817
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          PROTOTYPES
   027   0603260F        INTELLIGENCE              5,408           5,408
                          ADVANCED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   031   0603438F        SPACE CONTROL             6,075           6,075
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   032   0603742F        COMBAT                   10,980          10,980
                          IDENTIFICATION
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   033   0603790F        NATO RESEARCH             2,392           2,392
                          AND
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   034   0603791F        INTERNATIONAL               833             833
                          SPACE
                          COOPERATIVE
                          R&D.
   035   0603830F        SPACE SECURITY           32,313          32,313
                          AND DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
   037   0603851F        INTERCONTINENTA          30,885          30,885
                          L BALLISTIC
                          MISSILE--DEM/
                          VAL.
   039   0603859F        POLLUTION                 1,798           1,798
                          PREVENTION--DE
                          M/VAL.
   040   0604015F        LONG RANGE              913,728         913,728
                          STRIKE.
   042   0604317F        TECHNOLOGY                2,669           2,669
                          TRANSFER.
   045   0604422F        WEATHER SYSTEM           39,901           5,001
                          FOLLOW-ON.
         ..............      Realigned                         [-34,900]
                             to DMSP-20
                             launch.
   049   0604800F        F-35--EMD......           4,976           4,976
   050   0604857F        OPERATIONALLY                            30,000
                          RESPONSIVE
                          SPACE.
         ..............      ORS Office                         [30,000]
                             and ORS-5
                             Competition
                             Launch.
   051   0604858F        TECH TRANSITION          59,004          59,004
                          PROGRAM.
   054   0207110F        NEXT GENERATION          15,722          15,722
                          AIR DOMINANCE.
   055   0207455F        THREE                    88,825          88,825
                          DIMENSIONAL
                          LONG-RANGE
                          RADAR (3DELRR).
   056   0305164F        NAVSTAR GLOBAL          156,659         156,659
                          POSITIONING
                          SYSTEM (USER
                          EQUIPMENT)
                          (SPACE).
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,372,168       1,367,268
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            & PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          DEMONSTRATION
   059   0604233F        SPECIALIZED              13,324          13,324
                          UNDERGRADUATE
                          FLIGHT
                          TRAINING.
   060   0604270F        ELECTRONIC                1,965           1,965
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   061   0604281F        TACTICAL DATA            39,110          39,110
                          NETWORKS
                          ENTERPRISE.
   062   0604287F        PHYSICAL                  3,926           3,926
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT.
   063   0604329F        SMALL DIAMETER           68,759          68,759
                          BOMB (SDB)--
                          EMD.
   064   0604421F        COUNTERSPACE             23,746          23,746
                          SYSTEMS.
   065   0604425F        SPACE SITUATION           9,462          19,462
                          AWARENESS
                          SYSTEMS.
         ..............      Program                            [10,000]
                             increase.
   066   0604426F        SPACE FENCE....         214,131         214,131
   067   0604429F        AIRBORNE                 30,687          30,687
                          ELECTRONIC
                          ATTACK.
   068   0604441F        SPACE BASED             319,501         319,501
                          INFRARED
                          SYSTEM (SBIRS)
                          HIGH EMD.
   069   0604602F        ARMAMENT/                31,112          31,112
                          ORDNANCE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   070   0604604F        SUBMUNITIONS...           2,543           2,543
   071   0604617F        AGILE COMBAT             46,340          46,340
                          SUPPORT.
   072   0604706F        LIFE SUPPORT              8,854           8,854
                          SYSTEMS.
   073   0604735F        COMBAT TRAINING          10,129          10,129
                          RANGES.
   075   0604800F        F-35--EMD......         563,037         563,037
   078   0604932F        LONG RANGE                4,938           4,938
                          STANDOFF
                          WEAPON.
   079   0604933F        ICBM FUZE                59,826          59,826
                          MODERNIZATION.
   080   0605030F        JOINT TACTICAL               78              78
                          NETWORK CENTER
                          (JTNC).
   081   0605213F        F-22                    173,647         173,647
                          MODERNIZATION
                          INCREMENT 3.2B.
   082   0605214F        GROUND ATTACK             5,332           5,332
                          WEAPONS FUZE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   083   0605221F        KC-46..........         776,937         776,937
   084   0605223F        ADVANCED PILOT            8,201           8,201
                          TRAINING.
   086   0605278F        HC/MC-130 RECAP           7,497           7,497
                          RDT&E.
   087   0605431F        ADVANCED EHF            314,378         314,378
                          MILSATCOM
                          (SPACE).
   088   0605432F        POLAR MILSATCOM         103,552         103,552
                          (SPACE).
   089   0605433F        WIDEBAND GLOBAL          31,425          31,425
                          SATCOM (SPACE).
   090   0605458F        AIR & SPACE OPS          85,938          85,938
                          CENTER 10.2
                          RDT&E.
   091   0605931F        B-2 DEFENSIVE            98,768          98,768
                          MANAGEMENT
                          SYSTEM.
   092   0101125F        NUCLEAR WEAPONS         198,357         198,357
                          MODERNIZATION.
   094   0207701F        FULL COMBAT               8,831           8,831
                          MISSION
                          TRAINING.
   095   0307581F        NEXTGEN JSTARS.          73,088          73,088
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           3,337,419       3,347,419
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            &
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   097   0604256F        THREAT                   24,418          24,418
                          SIMULATOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   098   0604759F        MAJOR T&E                47,232          47,232
                          INVESTMENT.
   099   0605101F        RAND PROJECT             30,443          30,443
                          AIR FORCE.
   101   0605712F        INITIAL                  12,266      12,2666333
                          OPERATIONAL
                          TEST &
                          EVALUATION.
   102   0605807F        TEST AND                689,509         689,509
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   103   0605860F        ROCKET SYSTEMS           34,364          34,364
                          LAUNCH PROGRAM
                          (SPACE).
   104   0605864F        SPACE TEST               21,161          21,161
                          PROGRAM (STP).
   105   0605976F        FACILITIES               46,955          46,955
                          RESTORATION
                          AND
                          MODERNIZATION-
                          -TEST AND
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   106   0605978F        FACILITIES               32,965          32,965
                          SUSTAINMENT--T
                          EST AND
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   107   0606017F        REQUIREMENTS             13,850          13,850
                          ANALYSIS AND
                          MATURATION.
   108   0606116F        SPACE TEST AND           19,512          19,512
                          TRAINING RANGE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   110   0606392F        SPACE AND               181,727         181,727
                          MISSILE CENTER
                          (SMC) CIVILIAN
                          WORKFORCE.
   111   0308602F        ENTEPRISE                 4,938           4,938
                          INFORMATION
                          SERVICES (EIS).

[[Page 8701]]

 
   112   0702806F        ACQUISITION AND          18,644          18,644
                          MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT.
   113   0804731F        GENERAL SKILL             1,425           1,425
                          TRAINING.
   114   1001004F        INTERNATIONAL             3,790           3,790
                          ACTIVITIES.
  114A   XXXXXXXF        EJECTION SEAT                             3,500
                          RELIABILITY
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Initial                             [3,500]
                             Aircraft
                             Qualificati
                             on.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,183,199       1,186,699
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
   115   0603423F        GLOBAL                  299,760         299,760
                          POSITIONING
                          SYSTEM III--
                          OPERATIONAL
                          CONTROL
                          SEGMENT.
   116   0604445F        WIDE AREA                                 2,000
                          SURVEILLANCE.
         ..............      Implementat                         [2,000]
                             ion of the
                             Secretary's
                             Cruise
                             Missile
                             Defense
                             Program.
   118   0604618F        JOINT DIRECT              2,469           2,469
                          ATTACK
                          MUNITION.
   119   0605018F        AF INTEGRATED            90,218          90,218
                          PERSONNEL AND
                          PAY SYSTEM (AF-
                          IPPS).
   120   0605024F        ANTI-TAMPER              34,815          34,815
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          EXECUTIVE
                          AGENCY.
   122   0101113F        B-52 SQUADRONS.          55,457          55,457
   123   0101122F        AIR-LAUNCHED                450             450
                          CRUISE MISSILE
                          (ALCM).
   124   0101126F        B-1B SQUADRONS.           5,353           5,353
   125   0101127F        B-2 SQUADRONS..         131,580         102,180
         ..............      Flexible                          [-29,400]
                             Strike
                             execution
                             delay.
   126   0101213F        MINUTEMAN               139,109         139,109
                          SQUADRONS.
   127   0101313F        STRAT WAR                35,603          35,603
                          PLANNING
                          SYSTEM--USSTRA
                          TCOM.
   128   0101314F        NIGHT FIST--                 32              32
                          USSTRATCOM.
   130   0102326F        REGION/SECTOR             1,522           1,522
                          OPERATION
                          CONTROL CENTER
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   131   0105921F        SERVICE SUPPORT           3,134           3,134
                          TO STRATCOM--
                          SPACE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   133   0205219F        MQ-9 UAV.......         170,396         170,396
   136   0207133F        F-16 SQUADRONS.         133,105         133,105
   137   0207134F        F-15E SQUADRONS         261,969         261,969
   138   0207136F        MANNED                   14,831          14,831
                          DESTRUCTIVE
                          SUPPRESSION.
   139   0207138F        F-22A SQUADRONS         156,962         156,962
   140   0207142F        F-35 SQUADRONS.          43,666          43,666
   141   0207161F        TACTICAL AIM             29,739          29,739
                          MISSILES.
   142   0207163F        ADVANCED MEDIUM          82,195          82,195
                          RANGE AIR-TO-
                          AIR MISSILE
                          (AMRAAM).
   144   0207171F        F-15 EPAWSS....          68,944          53,444
         ..............      EPAWSS                            [-15,500]
                             contract
                             delays.
   145   0207224F        COMBAT RESCUE             5,095           5,095
                          AND RECOVERY.
   146   0207227F        COMBAT RESCUE--             883             883
                          PARARESCUE.
   147   0207247F        AF TENCAP......           5,812          15,812
         ..............      Program                            [10,000]
                             increase.
   148   0207249F        PRECISION                 1,081           1,081
                          ATTACK SYSTEMS
                          PROCUREMENT.
   149   0207253F        COMPASS CALL...          14,411          14,411
   150   0207268F        AIRCRAFT ENGINE         109,664         109,664
                          COMPONENT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   151   0207325F        JOINT AIR-TO-            15,897          15,897
                          SURFACE
                          STANDOFF
                          MISSILE
                          (JASSM).
   152   0207410F        AIR & SPACE              41,066          41,066
                          OPERATIONS
                          CENTER (AOC).
   153   0207412F        CONTROL AND                 552             552
                          REPORTING
                          CENTER (CRC).
   154   0207417F        AIRBORNE                180,804         180,804
                          WARNING AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM
                          (AWACS).
   155   0207418F        TACTICAL                  3,754           3,754
                          AIRBORNE
                          CONTROL
                          SYSTEMS.
   157   0207431F        COMBAT AIR                7,891           7,891
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SYSTEM
                          ACTIVITIES.
   158   0207444F        TACTICAL AIR              5,891           5,891
                          CONTROL PARTY-
                          MOD.
   159   0207448F        C2ISR TACTICAL            1,782           1,782
                          DATA LINK.
   161   0207452F        DCAPES.........             821             821
   163   0207590F        SEEK EAGLE.....          23,844          23,844
   164   0207601F        USAF MODELING            16,723          16,723
                          AND SIMULATION.
   165   0207605F        WARGAMING AND             5,956           5,956
                          SIMULATION
                          CENTERS.
   166   0207697F        DISTRIBUTED               4,457           4,457
                          TRAINING AND
                          EXERCISES.
   167   0208006F        MISSION                  60,679          60,679
                          PLANNING
                          SYSTEMS.
   169   0208059F        CYBER COMMAND            67,057          67,057
                          ACTIVITIES.
   170   0208087F        AF OFFENSIVE             13,355          13,355
                          CYBERSPACE
                          OPERATIONS.
   171   0208088F        AF DEFENSIVE              5,576           5,576
                          CYBERSPACE
                          OPERATIONS.
   179   0301400F        SPACE                    12,218          12,218
                          SUPERIORITY
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   180   0302015F        E-4B NATIONAL            28,778          28,778
                          AIRBORNE
                          OPERATIONS
                          CENTER (NAOC).
   181   0303131F        MINIMUM                  81,035          81,035
                          ESSENTIAL
                          EMERGENCY
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          NETWORK
                          (MEECN).
   182   0303140F        INFORMATION              70,497          70,497
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   183   0303141F        GLOBAL COMBAT               692             692
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   185   0303601F        MILSATCOM                55,208          55,208
                          TERMINALS.
   187   0304260F        AIRBORNE SIGINT         106,786         106,786
                          ENTERPRISE.
   190   0305099F        GLOBAL AIR                4,157           4,157
                          TRAFFIC
                          MANAGEMENT
                          (GATM).
   193   0305110F        SATELLITE                20,806          20,806
                          CONTROL
                          NETWORK
                          (SPACE).
   194   0305111F        WEATHER SERVICE          25,102          25,102
   195   0305114F        AIR TRAFFIC              23,516          23,516
                          CONTROL,
                          APPROACH, AND
                          LANDING SYSTEM
                          (ATCALS).
   196   0305116F        AERIAL TARGETS.           8,639           8,639
   199   0305128F        SECURITY AND                498             498
                          INVESTIGATIVE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   200   0305145F        ARMS CONTROL             13,222          13,222
                          IMPLEMENTATION.
   201   0305146F        DEFENSE JOINT               360             360
                          COUNTERINTELLI
                          GENCE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   206   0305173F        SPACE AND                 3,674           3,674
                          MISSILE TEST
                          AND EVALUATION
                          CENTER.
   207   0305174F        SPACE                     2,480           2,480
                          INNOVATION,
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND RAPID
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   208   0305179F        INTEGRATED                8,592           8,592
                          BROADCAST
                          SERVICE (IBS).
   209   0305182F        SPACELIFT RANGE          13,462          13,462
                          SYSTEM (SPACE).
   210   0305202F        DRAGON U-2.....           5,511           5,511

[[Page 8702]]

 
   212   0305206F        AIRBORNE                 28,113          38,113
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SYSTEMS.
         ..............      Per Air                            [10,000]
                             Force UFR.
   213   0305207F        MANNED                   13,516          13,516
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SYSTEMS.
   214   0305208F        DISTRIBUTED              27,265          27,265
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   215   0305219F        MQ-1 PREDATOR A           1,378           1,378
                          UAV.
   216   0305220F        RQ-4 UAV.......         244,514         244,514
   217   0305221F        NETWORK-CENTRIC          11,096          11,096
                          COLLABORATIVE
                          TARGETING.
   218   0305236F        COMMON DATA              36,137          36,137
                          LINK (CDL).
   219   0305238F        NATO AGS.......         232,851         232,851
   220   0305240F        SUPPORT TO DCGS          20,218          20,218
                          ENTERPRISE.
   221   0305265F        GPS III SPACE           212,571         212,571
                          SEGMENT.
   222   0305614F        JSPOC MISSION            73,779          73,779
                          SYSTEM.
   223   0305881F        RAPID CYBER               4,102           4,102
                          ACQUISITION.
   225   0305913F        NUDET DETECTION          20,468          20,468
                          SYSTEM (SPACE).
   226   0305940F        SPACE SITUATION          11,596          11,596
                          AWARENESS
                          OPERATIONS.
   227   0306250F        CYBER                     4,938           4,938
                          OPERATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   228   0308699F        SHARED EARLY              1,212           1,212
                          WARNING (SEW).
   230   0401119F        C-5 AIRLIFT              38,773          38,773
                          SQUADRONS (IF).
   231   0401130F        C-17 AIRCRAFT            83,773          83,773
                          (IF).
   232   0401132F        C-130J PROGRAM.          26,715          26,715
   233   0401134F        LARGE AIRCRAFT            5,172           5,172
                          IR
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S (LAIRCM).
   234   0401219F        KC-10S.........           2,714           2,714
   235   0401314F        OPERATIONAL              27,784          27,784
                          SUPPORT
                          AIRLIFT.
   236   0401318F        CV-22..........          38,719          38,719
   237   0401319F        PRESIDENTIAL             11,006          11,006
                          AIRCRAFT
                          REPLACEMENT
                          (PAR).
   238   0408011F        SPECIAL TACTICS           8,405           8,405
                          / COMBAT
                          CONTROL.
   239   0702207F        DEPOT                     1,407           1,407
                          MAINTENANCE
                          (NON-IF).
   241   0708610F        LOGISTICS               109,685         109,685
                          INFORMATION
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (LOGIT).
   242   0708611F        SUPPORT SYSTEMS          16,209          16,209
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   243   0804743F        OTHER FLIGHT                987             987
                          TRAINING.
   244   0808716F        OTHER PERSONNEL             126             126
                          ACTIVITIES.
   245   0901202F        JOINT PERSONNEL           2,603           2,603
                          RECOVERY
                          AGENCY.
   246   0901218F        CIVILIAN                  1,589           1,589
                          COMPENSATION
                          PROGRAM.
   247   0901220F        PERSONNEL                 5,026           5,026
                          ADMINISTRATION.
   248   0901226F        AIR FORCE                 1,394           1,394
                          STUDIES AND
                          ANALYSIS
                          AGENCY.
   249   0901279F        FACILITIES                3,798           3,798
                          OPERATION--ADM
                          INISTRATIVE.
   250   0901538F        FINANCIAL               107,314         107,314
                          MANAGEMENT
                          INFORMATION
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
  250A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED           11,441,120      11,363,920
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Classified                         [25,000]
                             program
                             increase.
         ..............      Classified                       [-102,200]
                             program
                             reduction.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL          15,717,666      15,617,566
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           23,739,892      23,865,392
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, AF.
         ..............
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          DW
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601000BR       DTRA BASIC               37,778          37,778
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVE.
   002   0601101E        DEFENSE                 312,146         312,146
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
   003   0601110D8Z      BASIC RESEARCH           44,564          34,564
                          INITIATIVES.
         ..............      National                          [-10,000]
                             Security
                             Science and
                             Engineering
                             Faculty
                             Fellowship
                             program.
   004   0601117E        BASIC                    49,848          49,848
                          OPERATIONAL
                          MEDICAL
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCE.
   005   0601120D8Z      NATIONAL                 45,488          55,488
                          DEFENSE
                          EDUCATION
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Pre-                               [10,000]
                             Kindergarte
                             n to 12th
                             Grade STEM
                             Programs.
   006   0601228D8Z      HISTORICALLY             24,412          34,412
                          BLACK COLLEGES
                          AND
                          UNIVERSITIES/
                          MINORITY
                          INSTITUTIONS.
         ..............      Historicall                        [10,000]
                             y Black
                             Colleges
                             and
                             Universitie
                             s.
   007   0601384BP       CHEMICAL AND             48,261          48,261
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             562,497         572,497
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   008   0602000D8Z      JOINT MUNITIONS          20,065          20,065
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   009   0602115E        BIOMEDICAL              112,242         112,242
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   011   0602234D8Z      LINCOLN                  51,875          51,875
                          LABORATORY
                          RESEARCH
                          PROGRAM.
   012   0602251D8Z      APPLIED                  41,965          41,965
                          RESEARCH FOR
                          THE
                          ADVANCEMENT OF
                          S&T PRIORITIES.
   013   0602303E        INFORMATION &           334,407         334,407
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   015   0602383E        BIOLOGICAL               44,825          44,825
                          WARFARE
                          DEFENSE.
   016   0602384BP       CHEMICAL AND            226,317         226,317
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
   018   0602668D8Z      CYBER SECURITY           15,000          15,000
                          RESEARCH.
   020   0602702E        TACTICAL                305,484         305,484
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   021   0602715E        MATERIALS AND           160,389         160,389
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   022   0602716E        ELECTRONICS             179,203         179,203
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   023   0602718BR       WEAPONS OF MASS         151,737         151,737
                          DESTRUCTION
                          DEFEAT
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   024   0602751D8Z      SOFTWARE                  9,156           9,156
                          ENGINEERING
                          INSTITUTE
                          (SEI) APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   025   1160401BB       SOF TECHNOLOGY           39,750          39,750
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,692,415       1,692,415
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   026   0603000D8Z      JOINT MUNITIONS          26,688          26,688
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   027   0603121D8Z      SO/LIC ADVANCED           8,682           8,682
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   028   0603122D8Z      COMBATING                69,675          89,675
                          TERRORISM
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          SUPPORT.

[[Page 8703]]

 
         ..............      Program                            [20,000]
                             emphasis
                             for CT and
                             Irregular
                             Warfare
                             Programs.
   029   0603133D8Z      FOREIGN                  30,000          24,000
                          COMPARATIVE
                          TESTING.
         ..............      Program                            [-6,000]
                             decrease.
   030   0603160BR       COUNTERPROLIFER         283,694         283,694
                          ATION
                          INITIATIVES--P
                          ROLIFERATION
                          PREVENTION AND
                          DEFEAT.
   032   0603176C        ADVANCED                  8,470           8,470
                          CONCEPTS AND
                          PERFORMANCE
                          ASSESSMENT.
   033   0603177C        DISCRIMINATION           45,110          45,110
                          SENSOR
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   034   0603178C        WEAPONS                  14,068          27,416
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............      MDA DE                             [13,348]
                             Ballistic
                             Missile
                             Kill
                             Capability
                             Development.
   035   0603179C        ADVANCED C4ISR.          15,329          15,329
   036   0603180C        ADVANCED                 16,584          16,584
                          RESEARCH.
   037   0603225D8Z      JOINT DOD-DOE            19,335          19,335
                          MUNITIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   038   0603264S        AGILE                     2,544           2,544
                          TRANSPORTATION
                          FOR THE 21ST
                          CENTURY
                          (AT21)--THEATE
                          R CAPABILITY.
   039   0603274C        SPECIAL                  51,033          51,033
                          PROGRAM--MDA
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   040   0603286E        ADVANCED                129,723         129,723
                          AEROSPACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   041   0603287E        SPACE PROGRAMS          179,883         179,883
                          AND TECHNOLOGY.
   042   0603288D8Z      ANALYTIC                 12,000          12,000
                          ASSESSMENTS.
   043   0603289D8Z      ADVANCED                 60,000          50,000
                          INNOVATIVE
                          ANALYSIS AND
                          CONCEPTS.
         ..............      Program                           [-10,000]
                             decrease.
   044   0603294C        COMMON KILL              25,639          25,639
                          VEHICLE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   045   0603384BP       CHEMICAL AND            132,674         132,674
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM--ADVAN
                          CED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   046   0603618D8Z      JOINT                    10,965          10,965
                          ELECTRONIC
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   047   0603648D8Z      JOINT                   131,960         121,960
                          CAPABILITY
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
         ..............      Program                           [-10,000]
                             decrease.
   052   0603680D8Z      DEFENSE-WIDE             91,095          91,095
                          MANUFACTURING
                          SCIENCE AND
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
   053   0603699D8Z      EMERGING                 33,706          33,706
                          CAPABILITIES
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   054   0603712S        GENERIC                  16,836          16,836
                          LOGISTICS R&D
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
   055   0603713S        DEPLOYMENT AND           29,683          29,683
                          DISTRIBUTION
                          ENTERPRISE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   056   0603716D8Z      STRATEGIC                57,796          57,796
                          ENVIRONMENTAL
                          RESEARCH
                          PROGRAM.
   057   0603720S        MICROELECTRONIC          72,144          72,144
                          S TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND SUPPORT.
   058   0603727D8Z      JOINT                     7,405           7,405
                          WARFIGHTING
                          PROGRAM.
   059   0603739E        ADVANCED                 92,246          92,246
                          ELECTRONICS
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   060   0603760E        COMMAND,                243,265         243,265
                          CONTROL AND
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS.
   062   0603766E        NETWORK-CENTRIC         386,926         386,926
                          WARFARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   063   0603767E        SENSOR                  312,821         312,821
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   064   0603769SE       DISTRIBUTED              10,692          10,692
                          LEARNING
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   065   0603781D8Z      SOFTWARE                 15,776          15,776
                          ENGINEERING
                          INSTITUTE.
   066   0603826D8Z      QUICK REACTION           69,319          64,319
                          SPECIAL
                          PROJECTS.
         ..............      Program                            [-5,000]
                             decrease.
   068   0603832D8Z      DOD MODELING              3,000           3,000
                          AND SIMULATION
                          MANAGEMENT
                          OFFICE.
   071   0603941D8Z      TEST &                   81,148          81,148
                          EVALUATION
                          SCIENCE &
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   072   0604055D8Z      OPERATIONAL              31,800          31,800
                          ENERGY
                          CAPABILITY
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   073   0303310D8Z      CWMD SYSTEMS...          46,066          46,066
   074   1160402BB       SOF ADVANCED             57,622          57,622
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           2,933,402       2,935,750
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND PROTOTYPES
   077   0603161D8Z      NUCLEAR AND              41,072          41,072
                          CONVENTIONAL
                          PHYSICAL
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT
                          RDT&E ADC&P.
   079   0603600D8Z      WALKOFF........          90,558          90,558
   080   0603714D8Z      ADVANCED                 15,518          15,518
                          SENSORS
                          APPLICATION
                          PROGRAM.
   081   0603851D8Z      ENVIRONMENTAL            51,462          51,462
                          SECURITY
                          TECHNICAL
                          CERTIFICATION
                          PROGRAM.
   082   0603881C        BALLISTIC               299,598         299,598
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          TERMINAL
                          DEFENSE
                          SEGMENT.
   083   0603882C        BALLISTIC             1,003,768       1,043,768
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          MIDCOURSE
                          DEFENSE
                          SEGMENT.
         ..............      BMD program                        [40,000]
                             increase.
   084   0603884BP       CHEMICAL AND            179,236         179,236
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM--DEM/
                          VAL.
   085   0603884C        BALLISTIC               392,893         392,893
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          SENSORS.
   086   0603890C        BMD ENABLING            410,863         410,863
                          PROGRAMS.
   087   0603891C        SPECIAL                 310,261         310,261
                          PROGRAMS--MDA.
   088   0603892C        AEGIS BMD......         929,208         929,208
   089   0603893C        SPACE TRACKING           31,346          31,346
                          & SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM.
   090   0603895C        BALLISTIC                 6,389           6,389
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE SYSTEM
                          SPACE PROGRAMS.
   091   0603896C        BALLISTIC               443,484         443,484
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL,
                          BATTLE
                          MANAGEMENT AND
                          COMMUNICATI.
   092   0603898C        BALLISTIC                46,387          46,387
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE JOINT
                          WARFIGHTER
                          SUPPORT.
   093   0603904C        MISSILE DEFENSE          58,530          58,530
                          INTEGRATION &
                          OPERATIONS
                          CENTER (MDIOC).
   094   0603906C        REGARDING                16,199          16,199
                          TRENCH.
   095   0603907C        SEA BASED X-             64,409          64,409
                          BAND RADAR
                          (SBX).
   096   0603913C        ISRAELI                  96,803         268,803
                          COOPERATIVE
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Program                           [172,000]
                             increase
                             for Israeli
                             Cooperative
                             Programs.
   097   0603914C        BALLISTIC               386,482         386,482
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE TEST.
   098   0603915C        BALLISTIC               485,294         485,294
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          TARGETS.
   099   0603920D8Z      HUMANITARIAN             10,194          10,194
                          DEMINING.
   100   0603923D8Z      COALITION                10,139          10,139
                          WARFARE.
   101   0604016D8Z      DEPARTMENT OF             2,907           2,907
                          DEFENSE
                          CORROSION
                          PROGRAM.
   102   0604250D8Z      ADVANCED                190,000         170,000
                          INNOVATIVE
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
         ..............      Program                           [-20,000]
                             decrease.
   103   0604400D8Z      DEPARTMENT OF             3,702           3,702
                          DEFENSE (DOD)
                          UNMANNED
                          AIRCRAFT
                          SYSTEM (UAS)
                          COMMON
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   104   0604445J        WIDE AREA                53,000          53,000
                          SURVEILLANCE.
   107   0604787J        JOINT SYSTEMS             7,002           7,002
                          INTEGRATION.

[[Page 8704]]

 
   108   0604828J        JOINT FIRES               7,102           7,102
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY TEAM.
   109   0604880C        LAND-BASED SM-3         123,444         123,444
                          (LBSM3).
   110   0604881C        AEGIS SM-3              263,695         263,695
                          BLOCK IIA CO-
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   113   0605170D8Z      SUPPORT TO               12,500          12,500
                          NETWORKS AND
                          INFORMATION
                          INTEGRATION.
   114   0303191D8Z      JOINT                     2,656           2,656
                          ELECTROMAGNETI
                          C TECHNOLOGY
                          (JET) PROGRAM.
   115   0305103C        CYBER SECURITY              961             961
                          INITIATIVE.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           6,047,062       6,239,062
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            AND
                            PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATION
   116   0604161D8Z      NUCLEAR AND               7,936           7,936
                          CONVENTIONAL
                          PHYSICAL
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT
                          RDT&E SDD.
   117   0604165D8Z      PROMPT GLOBAL            70,762          70,762
                          STRIKE
                          CAPABILITY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   118   0604384BP       CHEMICAL AND            345,883         345,883
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM--EMD.
   119   0604764K        ADVANCED IT              25,459          25,459
                          SERVICES JOINT
                          PROGRAM OFFICE
                          (AITS-JPO).
   120   0604771D8Z      JOINT TACTICAL           17,562          17,562
                          INFORMATION
                          DISTRIBUTION
                          SYSTEM (JTIDS).
   121   0605000BR       WEAPONS OF MASS           6,887           6,887
                          DESTRUCTION
                          DEFEAT
                          CAPABILITIES.
   122   0605013BL       INFORMATION              12,530          12,530
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   123   0605021SE       HOMELAND                    286             286
                          PERSONNEL
                          SECURITY
                          INITIATIVE.
   124   0605022D8Z      DEFENSE                   3,244           3,244
                          EXPORTABILITY
                          PROGRAM.
   125   0605027D8Z      OUSD(C) IT                6,500           6,500
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          INITIATIVES.
   126   0605070S        DOD ENTERPRISE           15,326          15,326
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATION.
   127   0605075D8Z      DCMO POLICY AND          19,351          19,351
                          INTEGRATION.
   128   0605080S        DEFENSE AGENCY           41,465          41,465
                          INTIATIVES
                          (DAI)--FINANCI
                          AL SYSTEM.
   129   0605090S        DEFENSE RETIRED          10,135          10,135
                          AND ANNUITANT
                          PAY SYSTEM
                          (DRAS).
   130   0605210D8Z      DEFENSE-WIDE              9,546           9,546
                          ELECTRONIC
                          PROCUREMENT
                          CAPABILITIES.
   131   0303141K        GLOBAL COMBAT            14,241          14,241
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   132   0305304D8Z      DOD ENTERPRISE            3,660           3,660
                          ENERGY
                          INFORMATION
                          MANAGEMENT
                          (EEIM).
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             610,773         610,773
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            AND
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   133   0604774D8Z      DEFENSE                   5,616           5,616
                          READINESS
                          REPORTING
                          SYSTEM (DRRS).
   134   0604875D8Z      JOINT SYSTEMS             3,092           3,092
                          ARCHITECTURE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   135   0604940D8Z      CENTRAL TEST            254,503         254,503
                          AND EVALUATION
                          INVESTMENT
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          (CTEIP).
   136   0604942D8Z      ASSESSMENTS AND          21,661          21,661
                          EVALUATIONS.
   138   0605100D8Z      JOINT MISSION            27,162          27,162
                          ENVIRONMENT
                          TEST
                          CAPABILITY
                          (JMETC).
   139   0605104D8Z      TECHNICAL                24,501          24,501
                          STUDIES,
                          SUPPORT AND
                          ANALYSIS.
   142   0605126J        JOINT                    43,176          43,176
                          INTEGRATED AIR
                          AND MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          ORGANIZATION
                          (JIAMDO).
   145   0605142D8Z      SYSTEMS                  44,246          44,246
                          ENGINEERING.
   146   0605151D8Z      STUDIES AND               2,665           2,665
                          ANALYSIS
                          SUPPORT--OSD.
   147   0605161D8Z      NUCLEAR MATTERS-          4,366           4,366
                          PHYSICAL
                          SECURITY.
   148   0605170D8Z      SUPPORT TO               27,901          27,901
                          NETWORKS AND
                          INFORMATION
                          INTEGRATION.
   149   0605200D8Z      GENERAL SUPPORT           2,855           2,855
                          TO USD
                          (INTELLIGENCE).
   150   0605384BP       CHEMICAL AND            105,944         105,944
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
   156   0605502KA       SMALL BUSINESS              400             400
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH.
   159   0605790D8Z      SMALL BUSINESS            1,634           1,634
                          INNOVATION
                          RESEARCH
                          (SBIR)/ SMALL
                          BUSINESS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          TRANSFER.
   160   0605798D8Z      DEFENSE                  12,105          12,105
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          ANALYSIS.
   161   0605801KA       DEFENSE                  50,389          50,389
                          TECHNICAL
                          INFORMATION
                          CENTER (DTIC).
   162   0605803SE       R&D IN SUPPORT            8,452           8,452
                          OF DOD
                          ENLISTMENT,
                          TESTING AND
                          EVALUATION.
   163   0605804D8Z      DEVELOPMENT              15,187          19,187
                          TEST AND
                          EVALUATION.
         ..............      Program                             [4,000]
                             increase.
   164   0605898E        MANAGEMENT HQ--          71,362          71,362
                          R&D.
   165   0606100D8Z      BUDGET AND                4,100           4,100
                          PROGRAM
                          ASSESSMENTS.
   166   0203345D8Z      DEFENSE                   1,956           1,956
                          OPERATIONS
                          SECURITY
                          INITIATIVE
                          (DOSI).
   167   0204571J        JOINT STAFF              10,321          10,321
                          ANALYTICAL
                          SUPPORT.
   170   0303166J        SUPPORT TO               11,552          11,552
                          INFORMATION
                          OPERATIONS
                          (IO)
                          CAPABILITIES.
   172   0305193D8Z      CYBER                     6,748           6,748
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   174   0804767D8Z      COCOM EXERCISE           44,005          44,005
                          ENGAGEMENT AND
                          TRAINING
                          TRANSFORMATION
                          (CE2T2).
   175   0901598C        MANAGEMENT HQ--          36,998          36,998
                          MDA.
   176   0901598D8W      MANAGEMENT                  612             612
                          HEADQUARTERS
                          WHS.
  177A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED               44,367          44,367
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             887,876         891,876
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT
   178   0604130V        ENTERPRISE                3,988           3,988
                          SECURITY
                          SYSTEM (ESS).
   179   0605127T        REGIONAL                  1,750           1,750
                          INTERNATIONAL
                          OUTREACH (RIO)
                          AND
                          PARTNERSHIP
                          FOR PEACE
                          INFORMATION
                          MANA.
   180   0605147T        OVERSEAS                    286             286
                          HUMANITARIAN
                          ASSISTANCE
                          SHARED
                          INFORMATION
                          SYSTEM
                          (OHASIS).
   181   0607210D8Z      INDUSTRIAL BASE          14,778          14,778
                          ANALYSIS AND
                          SUSTAINMENT
                          SUPPORT.
   182   0607310D8Z      OPERATIONAL               2,953           2,953
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   183   0607327T        GLOBAL THEATER           10,350          10,350
                          SECURITY
                          COOPERATION
                          MANAGEMENT
                          INFORMATION
                          SYSTEMS (G-
                          TSCMIS).
   184   0607384BP       CHEMICAL AND             28,496          28,496
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          (OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT).
   185   0607828J        JOINT                    11,968          11,968
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY.
   186   0208043J        PLANNING AND              1,842           1,842
                          DECISION AID
                          SYSTEM (PDAS).
   187   0208045K        C4I                      63,558          63,558
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY.
   189   0301144K        JOINT/ALLIED              3,931           3,931
                          COALITION
                          INFORMATION
                          SHARING.
   193   0302016K        NATIONAL                    924             924
                          MILITARY
                          COMMAND SYSTEM-
                          WIDE SUPPORT.
   194   0302019K        DEFENSE INFO              9,657           9,657
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          ENGINEERING
                          AND
                          INTEGRATION.
   195   0303126K        LONG-HAUL                25,355          25,355
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          -DCS.

[[Page 8705]]

 
   196   0303131K        MINIMUM                  12,671          12,671
                          ESSENTIAL
                          EMERGENCY
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          NETWORK
                          (MEECN).
   197   0303135G        PUBLIC KEY                  222             222
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          (PKI).
   198   0303136G        KEY MANAGEMENT           32,698          32,698
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          (KMI).
   199   0303140D8Z      INFORMATION              11,304          11,304
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   200   0303140G        INFORMATION             125,854         145,854
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Accelerate                         [20,000]
                             SHARKSEER
                             deployment.
   202   0303150K        GLOBAL COMMAND           33,793          33,793
                          AND CONTROL
                          SYSTEM.
   203   0303153K        DEFENSE                  13,423          13,423
                          SPECTRUM
                          ORGANIZATION.
   204   0303170K        NET-CENTRIC               3,774           3,774
                          ENTERPRISE
                          SERVICES
                          (NCES).
   205   0303260D8Z      DEFENSE                     951             951
                          MILITARY
                          DECEPTION
                          PROGRAM OFFICE
                          (DMDPO).
   206   0303610K        TELEPORT                  2,697           2,697
                          PROGRAM.
   208   0304210BB       SPECIAL                  19,294          19,294
                          APPLICATIONS
                          FOR
                          CONTINGENCIES.
   212   0305103K        CYBER SECURITY            3,234           3,234
                          INITIATIVE.
   213   0305125D8Z      CRITICAL                  8,846           8,846
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          PROTECTION
                          (CIP).
   217   0305186D8Z      POLICY R&D                7,065           7,065
                          PROGRAMS.
   218   0305199D8Z      NET CENTRICITY.          23,984          23,984
   221   0305208BB       DISTRIBUTED               5,286           5,286
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   224   0305208K        DISTRIBUTED               3,400           3,400
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   229   0305327V        INSIDER THREAT.           8,670           8,670
   230   0305387D8Z      HOMELAND                  2,110           2,110
                          DEFENSE
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          TRANSFER
                          PROGRAM.
   239   0708011S        INDUSTRIAL               22,366          22,366
                          PREPAREDNESS.
   240   0708012S        LOGISTICS                 1,574           1,574
                          SUPPORT
                          ACTIVITIES.
   241   0902298J        MANAGEMENT HQ--           4,409           4,409
                          OJCS.
   242   1105219BB       MQ-9 UAV.......           9,702           9,702
   243   1105232BB       RQ-11 UAV......             259             259
   245   1160403BB       AVIATION                164,233         164,233
                          SYSTEMS.
   247   1160405BB       INTELLIGENCE              9,490           9,490
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   248   1160408BB       OPERATIONAL              75,253          75,253
                          ENHANCEMENTS.
   252   1160431BB       WARRIOR SYSTEMS          24,661          24,661
   253   1160432BB       SPECIAL                  20,908          20,908
                          PROGRAMS.
   259   1160480BB       SOF TACTICAL              3,672           3,672
                          VEHICLES.
   262   1160483BB       MARITIME                 57,905          57,905
                          SYSTEMS.
   264   1160489BB       GLOBAL VIDEO              3,788           3,788
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   265   1160490BB       OPERATIONAL              16,225          16,225
                          ENHANCEMENTS
                          INTELLIGENCE.
  265A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED            3,118,502       3,113,502
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Classified                         [-5,000]
                             adjustment.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           4,032,059       4,047,059
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           16,766,084      16,989,432
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, DW.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          DEFENSE
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   001   0605118OTE      OPERATIONAL              74,583          74,583
                          TEST AND
                          EVALUATION.
   002   0605131OTE      LIVE FIRE TEST           45,142          45,142
                          AND EVALUATION.
   003   0605814OTE      OPERATIONAL              48,013          53,013
                          TEST
                          ACTIVITIES AND
                          ANALYSES.
         ..............      Information                         [5,000]
                             Assurance
                             Testing and
                             Exercises.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             167,738         172,738
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL              167,738         172,738
                              OPERATIONA
                              L TEST &
                              EVAL,
                              DEFENSE.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           63,533,947      63,791,399
                              RDT&E.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

     SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     FY 2015          House
    Line                                    Item                                     Request        Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS....................................................         969,281       1,069,281
                 Restore Critical Operations Tempo.............................                        [100,000]
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES..........................................          61,990          61,990
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................         450,987         450,487
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS..............................................         545,773         543,773
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT....................................       1,057,453       1,046,453
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-10,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
       060   AVIATION ASSETS...................................................       1,409,347       1,547,947
                 Restore Critical Aviation Readiness...........................                        [100,000]
                 UH-60A to UH-60L Conversions/ARNG Modernization...............                         [38,600]

[[Page 8706]]

 
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................       3,592,334       3,567,334
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-19,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-5,500]
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS.....................................         411,388         411,388
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE.....................................       1,001,232       1,100,732
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................                        [100,000]
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT...........................................       7,428,972       7,346,972
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-27,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-55,000]
       110   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............       2,066,434       1,976,434
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-7,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-58,000]
                 Transfer to Arlington National Cemetery.......................                        [-25,000]
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS...........................         411,863         411,363
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       130   COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS..............................         179,399         178,899
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       170   COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT.........................         432,281         429,781
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................      20,018,734      20,142,834
 
             MOBILIZATION
       180   STRATEGIC MOBILITY................................................         316,776         315,776
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       190   ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS.........................................         187,609         186,109
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       200   INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS...........................................           6,463          86,463
                 Industrial Base Intiative-Body Armor..........................                         [80,000]
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION.........................................         510,848         588,348
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       210   OFFICER ACQUISITION...............................................         124,766         123,766
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       220   RECRUIT TRAINING..................................................          51,968          51,468
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       230   ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING.........................................          43,735          43,735
       240   SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS............................         456,563         456,063
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       250   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................         886,529         876,029
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-8,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
       260   FLIGHT TRAINING...................................................         890,070         890,070
       270   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................         193,291         190,291
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       280   TRAINING SUPPORT..................................................         552,359         551,359
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       290   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................         466,927         461,427
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-5,500]
       300   EXAMINING.........................................................         194,588         194,588
       310   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..................................         205,782         197,782
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-8,000]
       320   CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING...................................         150,571         149,071
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       330   JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS.............................         169,784         162,784
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-7,000]
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING..............................       4,386,933       4,348,433
 
             ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
       350   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................         541,877         541,877
       360   CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES.........................................         722,291         722,291
       370   LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.......................................         602,034         604,034
                 Corrosion Mitigation Activities...............................                          [5,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       380   AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT.............................................         422,277         419,777
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
       390   ADMINISTRATION....................................................         405,442         404,942
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       400   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................       1,624,742       1,622,742
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,500]
       410   MANPOWER MANAGEMENT...............................................         289,771         289,271
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       420   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT...........................................         390,924         385,424

[[Page 8707]]

 
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-5,500]
       430   OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT.............................................       1,118,540       1,117,040
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       440   ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES............................................         241,234         239,734
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       450   REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............................................         243,509         242,509
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       460   FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS..........................         200,615         199,115
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       470   INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS...............................         462,591         462,091
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       480   MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS....................................          27,375          27,375
      520A   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS...............................................       1,030,411       1,029,411
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES...........................       8,323,633       8,307,633
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       530   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                        -516,200
                 Civilian personnel underexecution.............................                        [-80,000]
                 Foreign Currency adjustments..................................                        [-48,900]
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                       [-387,300]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                        -516,200
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY..........................      33,240,148      32,871,048
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
             OPERATING FORCES
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES..........................................          15,200          15,200
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................         502,664         532,164
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Restore Critical Operations Tempo.............................                         [30,000]
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS..............................................         107,489         107,489
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT....................................         543,989         543,989
       060   AVIATION ASSETS...................................................          72,963          72,963
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................         360,082         358,082
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS.....................................          72,491          72,491
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE.....................................          58,873          93,873
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................                         [35,000]
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT...........................................         388,961         386,461
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
       110   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............         228,597         219,097
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-9,000]
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS...........................          39,590          39,590
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................       2,390,899       2,441,399
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       130   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................          10,608          10,608
       140   ADMINISTRATION....................................................          18,587          18,587
       150   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................           6,681           6,681
       160   MANPOWER MANAGEMENT...............................................           9,192           9,192
       170   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................          54,602          54,102
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................          99,670          99,170
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       180   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                         -38,700
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                        [-38,700]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                         -38,700
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES......................       2,490,569       2,501,869
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS....................................................         660,648         909,748
                 National Guard combat training center rotations activities....                         [70,000]
                 National Guard critical operations tempo activities...........                         [99,600]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Restore Critical Operations Tempo.............................                         [80,000]
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES..........................................         165,942         165,942
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................         733,800         733,800
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS..............................................          83,084          83,084
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT....................................          22,005          22,005
       060   AVIATION ASSETS...................................................         920,085         920,085
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................         680,887         673,887
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-5,000]

[[Page 8708]]

 
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS.....................................          69,726          69,726
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE.....................................         138,263         185,863
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,500]
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................                         [49,600]
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT...........................................         804,517         792,017
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-10,000]
       110   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............         490,205         471,705
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-18,500]
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS...........................         872,140         871,140
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................       5,641,302       5,899,002
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       130   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................           6,690           6,690
       140   REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............................................           1,765           1,765
       150   ADMINISTRATION....................................................          63,075          65,075
                 National Guard State Partnership Program......................                          [2,000]
       160   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................          37,372          37,372
       170   MANPOWER MANAGEMENT...............................................           6,484           6,484
       180   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT...........................................         274,085         269,585
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-4,500]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................         389,471         386,971
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       190   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                         -72,400
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                        [-72,400]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                         -72,400
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG..........................       6,030,773       6,213,573
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS...............................       4,947,202       5,002,202
                 FHP Unit Level Maintenance....................................                         [56,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       020   FLEET AIR TRAINING................................................       1,647,943       1,659,443
                 FHP Unit Level Maintenance....................................                         [12,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       030   AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES....................          37,050          37,050
       040   AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT.................................          96,139          95,639
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       050   AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT...............................................         363,763         362,763
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       060   AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........................................         814,770         935,870
                 Aviation Depot Maintenance....................................                        [111,000]
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                         [10,100]
       070   AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................          36,494          36,494
       080   AVIATION LOGISTICS................................................         350,641         473,141
                  Aviation Logistics...........................................                        [123,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       090   MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.................................       3,865,379       3,959,879
                  Joint High Speed Vessel Operations...........................                         [10,000]
                 CLF steaming days.............................................                         [13,000]
                 Corrosion Mitigation Activities...............................                          [5,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-5,500]
                 T-AKEs to Full Operational Status.............................                         [72,000]
       100   SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING................................         711,243         709,743
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
       110   SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............................................       5,296,408       5,327,608
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                         [33,700]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       120   SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....................................       1,339,077       1,335,877
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                            [300]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-3,500]
       130   COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS.............................................         708,634         706,634
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
       140   ELECTRONIC WARFARE................................................          91,599          91,099
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       150   SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE....................................         207,038         206,538
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       160   WARFARE TACTICS...................................................         432,715         431,715
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       170   OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY..........................         338,116         337,616
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]

[[Page 8709]]

 
       180   COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES.............................................         892,316         891,316
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       190   EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.............................................         128,486         128,486
       200   DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT..........................................           2,472           2,472
       210   COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS..............................         101,200         100,700
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       220   COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT.......................         188,920         186,420
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
       230   CRUISE MISSILE....................................................         109,911         109,911
       240   FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE...........................................       1,172,823       1,172,823
       250   IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT................................         104,139         104,139
       260   WEAPONS MAINTENANCE...............................................         490,911         490,411
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       270   OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT......................................         324,861         323,861
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       290   ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............................................         936,743         934,243
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
       300   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION........................       1,483,495       1,422,995
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-60,500]
       310   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................       4,398,667       4,364,167
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-34,500]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................      31,619,155      31,941,255
 
             MOBILIZATION
       320   SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE.....................................         526,926         526,926
       330   READY RESERVE FORCE...............................................             195             195
       340   AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS................................           6,704           6,704
       350   SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS....................................         251,538         205,538
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                        [-46,000]
       360   EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS.............................         124,323         124,323
       370   INDUSTRIAL READINESS..............................................           2,323           2,323
       380   COAST GUARD SUPPORT...............................................          20,333          20,333
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION.........................................         932,342         886,342
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       390   OFFICER ACQUISITION...............................................         156,214         155,714
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       400   RECRUIT TRAINING..................................................           8,863           8,963
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                            [100]
       410   RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS...................................         148,150         148,150
       420   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................         601,501         604,201
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                          [7,200]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-4,500]
       430   FLIGHT TRAINING...................................................           8,239           8,239
       440   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................         164,214         165,362
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                          [1,000]
                 Naval Sea Cadets..............................................                          [1,148]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       450   TRAINING SUPPORT..................................................         182,619         183,019
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                            [900]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       460   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................         230,589         230,089
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       470   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..................................         115,595         114,095
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       480   CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING...................................          79,606          79,106
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       490   JUNIOR ROTC.......................................................          41,664          39,664
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING..............................       1,737,254       1,736,602
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       500   ADMINISTRATION....................................................         858,871         852,871
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-6,000]
       510   EXTERNAL RELATIONS................................................          12,807          12,807
       520   CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT........................         119,863         119,863
       530   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT........................         356,113         353,013
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                            [900]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-4,000]
       540   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT...........................................         255,605         255,105
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       550   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................         339,802         337,802
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
       570   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................         172,203         172,203
       590   PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN..................................         283,621         282,621
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       600   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................       1,111,464       1,110,464
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]

[[Page 8710]]

 
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       610   HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT...........................          43,232          43,232
       620   COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS............................................          25,689          25,689
       630   SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS..............................          73,159          72,659
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       640   NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE.......................................         548,640         548,140
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       700   INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES...........................           4,713           4,713
      720A   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS...............................................         531,324         530,324
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................       4,737,106       4,721,506
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       730   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                        -402,900
                 Civilian personnel underexecution.............................                        [-80,000]
                 Foreign Currency adjustments..................................                        [-74,200]
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                       [-248,700]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                        -402,900
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY..........................      39,025,857      38,882,805
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   OPERATIONAL FORCES................................................         905,744         944,044
                 Corrosion Mitigation Activities...............................                          [5,000]
                 Crisis Response Operations Unfunded Requirement...............                         [33,800]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       020   FIELD LOGISTICS...................................................         921,543         920,543
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................         229,058         280,058
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................                         [51,000]
       040   MARITIME PREPOSITIONING...........................................          87,660          87,660
       050   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION..........................         573,926         556,926
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-16,000]
       060   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................       1,983,118       1,977,618
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-4,000]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................       4,701,049       4,766,849
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       070   RECRUIT TRAINING..................................................          18,227          18,227
       080   OFFICER ACQUISITION...............................................             948             948
       090   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................          98,448          98,448
       100   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................          42,305          42,305
       110   TRAINING SUPPORT..................................................         330,156         328,156
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,500]
       120   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................         161,752         161,752
       130   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..................................          19,137          18,637
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       140   JUNIOR ROTC.......................................................          23,277          23,277
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING..............................         694,250         691,750
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       150   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................          36,359          36,359
       160   ADMINISTRATION....................................................         362,608         352,508
                 Marine Museum Unjustified Growth..............................                         [-9,100]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       180   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................          70,515          70,515
      180A   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS...............................................          44,706          44,706
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................         514,188         504,088
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       190   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                        -109,900
                 Foreign Currency adjustments..................................                        [-28,400]
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                        [-81,500]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                        -109,900
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS..................       5,909,487       5,852,787
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS...............................         565,842         573,742
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                          [7,900]
       020   INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE..........................................           5,948           5,948
       040   AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........................................          82,636          84,936

[[Page 8711]]

 
                 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)..................                          [2,300]
       050   AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................             353             353
       060   AVIATION LOGISTICS................................................           7,007           7,007
       070   MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.................................           8,190           8,190
       080   SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING................................             556             556
       090   SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............................................           4,571           4,571
       100   COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS.............................................          14,472          14,472
       110   COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES.............................................         119,056         119,056
       120   WEAPONS MAINTENANCE...............................................           1,852           1,852
       130   ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............................................          25,354          25,354
       140   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION........................          48,271          46,271
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
       150   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................         101,921         101,421
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................         986,029         993,729
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       160   ADMINISTRATION....................................................           1,520           1,520
       170   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT........................          12,998          12,998
       180   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................           3,395           3,395
       190   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................           3,158           3,158
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................          21,071          21,071
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       210   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                         -10,500
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                        [-10,500]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                         -10,500
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES......................       1,007,100       1,004,300
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   OPERATING FORCES..................................................          93,093          93,093
       020   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................          18,377          18,377
       030   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION........................          29,232          27,732
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,500]
       040   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................         106,447         105,447
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................         247,149         244,649
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       050   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................             914             914
       060   ADMINISTRATION....................................................          11,831          11,831
       070   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................           8,688           8,688
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................          21,433          21,433
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       080   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                            -100
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                           [-100]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                            -100
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE....................         268,582         265,982
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES.............................................       3,163,457       3,256,557
                 Corrosion Prevention..........................................                          [5,000]
                 Cyber Weapon System Ops.......................................                         [50,000]
                 Cyberspace Defense Weapon System and Cyber Mission Forces.....                         [30,000]
                 Nuclear Force Improvement Program--Security Forces............                          [8,600]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       020   COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES.........................................       1,694,339       1,686,339
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-8,000]
       030   AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)....................       1,579,178       1,574,678
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,500]
       040   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................       6,119,522       6,111,522
                 RC/OC-135 Contractor Logistics Support Unjustified Growth.....                         [-8,000]
       050   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............       1,453,589       1,447,989
                 Nuclear Force Improvement Program--Installation Surety........                          [3,400]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-9,000]
       060   BASE SUPPORT......................................................       2,599,419       2,587,419
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-10,000]
       070   GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING......................................         908,790         919,861
                 Program increase..............................................                         [14,571]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
       080   OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS.....................................         856,306         862,906

[[Page 8712]]

 
                 Nuclear Force Improvement Program--ICBM Training Hardware.....                          [9,600]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-3,000]
       090   TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES.......................         800,689         800,189
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       100   LAUNCH FACILITIES.................................................         282,710         282,710
       110   SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS.............................................         397,818         397,318
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       120   COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT.......................         871,840         884,440
                 PACOM Prepositioned Munition Shortfall Mitigation.............                         [19,100]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-6,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       130   COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS..............................         237,348         237,348
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................      20,965,005      21,049,276
 
             MOBILIZATION
       140   AIRLIFT OPERATIONS................................................       1,968,810       1,966,310
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,500]
       150   MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS.........................................         139,743         139,243
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       160   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................       1,534,560       1,534,560
       170   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............         173,627         171,627
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
       180   BASE SUPPORT......................................................         688,801         686,301
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,000]
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION.........................................       4,505,541       4,498,041
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       190   OFFICER ACQUISITION...............................................          82,396          82,396
       200   RECRUIT TRAINING..................................................          19,852          19,852
       210   RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)............................          76,134          73,134
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-3,000]
       220   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............         212,226         208,726
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-3,500]
       230   BASE SUPPORT......................................................         759,809         754,309
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-4,500]
       240   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................         356,157         356,157
       250   FLIGHT TRAINING...................................................         697,594         694,594
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,500]
       260   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................         219,441         218,441
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       270   TRAINING SUPPORT..................................................          91,001          91,001
       280   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................         316,688         316,688
       290   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................          73,920          73,920
       300   EXAMINING.........................................................           3,121           3,121
       310   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..................................         181,718         174,218
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-7,500]
       320   CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING...................................         147,667         147,167
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       330   JUNIOR ROTC.......................................................          63,250          60,250
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-3,000]
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING..............................       3,300,974       3,273,974
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       340   LOGISTICS OPERATIONS..............................................       1,003,513       1,044,013
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
                 SDT Program...................................................                         [41,000]
       350   TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES......................................         843,449         841,449
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
       360   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................          78,126          78,126
       370   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............         247,677         244,177
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-3,500]
       380   BASE SUPPORT......................................................       1,103,442       1,096,442
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-5,500]
       390   ADMINISTRATION....................................................         597,234         596,234
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       400   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................         506,840         506,840
       410   OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES......................................         892,256         889,256
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-2,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
       420   CIVIL AIR PATROL..................................................          24,981          24,981
       450   INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT.............................................          92,419          91,919
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
      450A   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS...............................................       1,169,736       1,159,236
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-9,500]

[[Page 8713]]

 
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES.............................       6,559,673       6,572,673
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       460   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                        -242,900
                 Civilian personnel underexecution.............................                        [-80,000]
                 Foreign Currency adjustments..................................                        [-51,900]
                 Readiness support.............................................                        [221,500]
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                       [-332,500]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                        -242,900
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE.....................      35,331,193      35,151,064
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES.............................................       1,719,467       1,719,467
       020   MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........................................         211,132         211,132
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................         530,301         530,301
       040   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............          85,672          84,672
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
       050   BASE SUPPORT......................................................         367,966         365,466
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-2,500]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................       2,914,538       2,911,038
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
       060   ADMINISTRATION....................................................          59,899          59,899
       070   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................          14,509          14,509
       080   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)............................          20,345          20,345
       090   OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)..............................           6,551           6,551
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES............         101,304         101,304
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       110   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                         -13,400
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                        [-13,400]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                         -13,400
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE....................       3,015,842       2,998,942
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS...............................................       3,367,729       3,366,729
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       020   MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........................................         718,295         717,295
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................................................       1,528,695       1,528,695
       040   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...............         137,604         133,604
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-4,000]
       050   BASE SUPPORT......................................................         581,536         569,036
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-12,500]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................       6,333,859       6,315,359
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES
       060   ADMINISTRATION....................................................          27,812          27,812
       070   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................          31,188          30,688
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES...........          59,000          58,500
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       080   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                            -800
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                           [-800]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                            -800
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG...........................       6,392,859       6,373,059
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.............................................         462,107         460,607
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       020   SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES.......................       4,762,245       4,707,945
                 MSV--USSOCOM Maritime Support Vessel..........................                        [-20,300]
                 NCR--USSOCOM National Capitol Region Office...................                         [-5,000]
                 POTFF--Human Performance......................................                        [-23,300]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-26,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-5,000]
                 RSCC--Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers.                         [-3,600]
                 USSOCOM Flight Operations (Flight Hours)......................                         [31,460]
                 USSOCOM Joint Special Operations University...................                         [-2,560]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES.....................................       5,224,352       5,168,552
 

[[Page 8714]]

 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       030   DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY....................................         135,437         135,437
       040   NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY.......................................          80,082          80,082
       050   SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING................         371,620         371,620
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING..............................         587,139         587,139
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
       060   CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS...........................................         119,888         140,888
                 STARBASE......................................................                         [21,000]
       080   DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY.....................................         556,493         556,493
       090   DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY................................       1,340,374       1,339,874
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       100   DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY..................................         633,300         613,300
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-20,000]
       110   DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY................................       1,263,678       1,258,678
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-4,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-1,000]
       130   DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY.....................................          26,710          26,710
       140   DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY..........................................         381,470         380,470
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
       150   DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY............................................         194,520         183,020
                 Program decrease..............................................                        [-10,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,500]
       160   DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE............................................          21,485          21,485
       170   DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY...............................         544,786         523,786
                 Global Security Contingency Fund..............................                        [-30,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
                 Warsaw Initiative Fund/Partnership For Peace..................                         [10,000]
       180   DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE..........................................         527,812         527,312
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       200   DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION........................          32,787          32,787
       230   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY..........................       2,566,424       2,551,924
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-6,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                         [-8,500]
       240   MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY............................................         416,644         415,144
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                           [-500]
       260   OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT.....................................         186,987         106,391
                 Office of Economic Adjustment.................................                        [-80,596]
       265   OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT..........................................                          18,944
                 Program increase..............................................                         [10,000]
                 Transfer from line 270........................................                          [8,944]
       270   OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE................................       1,891,163       1,790,419
                 BRAC 2015 Round Planning and Analyses.........................                         [-4,800]
                 Corrosion Prevention Program Office...........................                          [5,000]
                 DOD Rewards Program Underexecution............................                         [-4,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-51,500]
                 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance.....                        [-36,500]
                 Transfer funding for Office of Net Assessment to new line 265.                         [-8,944]
       280   SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES............          87,915          87,915
       290   WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES..................................         610,982         609,982
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-1,000]
      290A   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS...............................................      13,983,323      13,987,323
                 Classified adjustment.........................................                         [10,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-6,000]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES............      25,386,741      25,172,845
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       300   UNDISTRIBUTED.....................................................                        -280,400
                 Civilian personnel underexecution.............................                        [-75,000]
                 Foreign Currency adjustments..................................                        [-17,500]
                 Impact Aid....................................................                         [25,000]
                 Unobligated balances..........................................                       [-212,900]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................                        -280,400
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE..................      31,198,232      30,648,136
 
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
       010   US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE.................          13,723          13,723
       020   OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID.....................         100,000         104,500
                 Humanitarian Mine Action......................................                          [5,000]
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
       030   COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION......................................         365,108         354,608
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                        [-10,500]
       040   ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD..............................................         212,875         209,375
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                         [-3,500]
       050   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY...................................         201,560         201,560
       060   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY...................................         277,294         277,294
       070   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE..............................         408,716         408,716

[[Page 8715]]

 
       080   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE................................           8,547           8,547
       090   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES.....................         208,353         208,353
       100   OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND.....................           5,000               0
                 Program decrease..............................................                         [-5,000]
       110   SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS, DEFENSE...........          10,000           5,200
                 Reduction in contracts for Other Services.....................                           [-500]
                 Unjustified program increase..................................                         [-4,300]
                 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS.........................       1,811,176       1,791,876
 
                  TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS...........................       1,811,176       1,791,876
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE................................     165,721,818     164,555,441
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

     SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            FY 2015           House
                 Item                       Request         Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations.....     128,957,593      129,007,023
     Air Force airborne warning and                              12,200
     control system personnel.........
     CVN 73 Refueling and Complex                               [48,000]
     Overhaul (RCOH)..................
     Foreign Currency Adjustments.....                        [-193,200]
     Military Personnel unobligated                           [-360,470]
     balances.........................
     Recalculation from CPI-1 to CPI..                         [534,900]
     Special training and exercises                              [8,000]
     for National Guard State
     Partnership Program..............
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund        6,236,092        6,237,092
 Contributions........................
     CVN 73 Refueling and Complex                                [1,000]
     Overhaul (RCOH)..................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

     SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2015          House
                  Item                        Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS........         13,727          13,727
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY.....         13,727          13,727
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL).         61,717          61,717
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE         61,717          61,717
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)..........         44,293          44,293
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-          44,293          44,293
   WIDE.................................
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA..............      1,114,731       1,214,731
     Working Capital Fund, DECA.........                       [100,000]
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA.....      1,114,731       1,214,731
 
CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE.................        222,728         222,728
RDT&E...................................        595,913         595,913
PROCUREMENT.............................         10,227          10,227
   TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS                828,868         828,868
   DESTRUCTION..........................
 
DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
 DEF
DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG              719,096         719,096
 ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE....................
DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM...........        101,591         101,591
   TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG           820,687         820,687
   ACTIVITIES, DEF......................
 
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE...............        310,830         310,830
PROCUREMENT.............................          1,000           1,000
   TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL        311,830         311,830
 
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
IN-HOUSE CARE...........................      8,799,086       8,884,386
     Implementation of Benefit Reform                          [-30,000]
     Proposal...........................

[[Page 8716]]

 
     Restoration of MHS Modernization...                        [92,000]
     USSOCOM Behavioral Health and                              [23,300]
     Warrior Care Management Program....
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE.....................     15,412,599      15,354,599
     Implementation of Benefit Reform                          [-58,000]
     Proposal...........................
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT.............      2,462,096       2,462,096
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT..................      1,557,347       1,557,347
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES...................        366,223         366,223
EDUCATION AND TRAINING..................        750,866         750,866
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS..........      1,683,694       1,683,694
 
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
R&D RESEARCH............................         10,317          20,317
     Surgical Critical Care Research....                        [10,000]
R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT..............         49,015          49,015
R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT................        226,410         226,410
R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION............         97,787          97,787
R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT.............        217,898         217,898
R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT..............         38,075          38,075
R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT............         15,092          15,092
 
PROCUREMENT
PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING.................         13,057          13,057
PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION........        283,030         283,030
PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM          3,145           3,145
PROC IEHR...............................          9,181           9,181
 
UNDISTRIBUTED
UNDISTRIBUTED...........................       -161,857        -586,557
     Foreign Currency adjustments.......                       [-13,100]
     Unobligated balances...............                      [-411,600]
   TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.........     31,833,061      31,445,661
 
   TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS...........     35,028,914      34,741,514
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                State/Country and                                     Budget           House
          Account                 Installation               Project Title            Request        Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            California
Army                          Concord                 Access Control Point......           9,900           9,900
Army                          Concord                 General Purpose                      5,300           5,300
                                                       Maintenance Shop.
Army                          Fort Irwin              Unmanned Aerial Vehicle             45,000          45,000
                                                       Hangar.
                            Colorado
Army                          Fort Carson, Colorado   Aircraft Maintenance                60,000          60,000
                                                       Hangar.
Army                          Fort Carson, Colorado   Unmanned Aerial Vehicle             29,000          29,000
                                                       Hangar.
                            Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Army                          Guantanamo Bay          Dining Facility...........          12,000          12,000
Army                          Guantanamo Bay          Health Clinic.............          11,800          11,800
Army                          Guantanamo Bay          High Value Detainee                      0          69,000
                                                       Complex.
                            Hawaii
Army                          Fort Shafter            Command and Control                 96,000          83,000
                                                       Facility (Scif).
                            Japan
Army                          Kadena Ab               Missile Magazine..........          10,600          10,600
                            Kentucky
Army                          Blue Grass Army Depot   Shipping and Receiving                   0          15,000
                                                       Building.
Army                          Fort Campbell,          Unmanned Aerial Vehicle             23,000          23,000
                               Kentucky                Hangar.
                            New York
Army                          Fort Drum, New York     Unmanned Aerial Vehicle             27,000          27,000
                                                       Hangar.
Army                          U.S. Military Academy   Cadet Barracks, Incr 3....          58,000          58,000
                            Pennsylvania
Army                          Letterkenny Army Depot  Rebuild Shop..............          16,000          16,000
                            South Carolina
Army                          Fort Jackson            Trainee Barracks Complex            52,000          52,000
                                                       3, Ph1.
                            Texas
Army                          Fort Hood               Simulations Center........               0          46,000
                            Virginia
Army                          Fort Lee                Adv. Individual Training                 0          86,000
                                                       Barracks Complex, Phase 3.
Army                          Joint Base Langley-     Tactical Vehicle Hardstand           7,700           7,700
                               Eustis
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Army                          Unspecified Worldwide   Host Nation Support Fy15..          33,000          33,000
                               Locations
Army                          Unspecified Worldwide   Minor Construction Fy15...          25,000          25,000
                               Locations

[[Page 8717]]

 
Army                          Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design Fy15..          18,127          18,127
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Army                                                 539,427         742,427
                              ......................
                            Arizona
Navy                          Yuma                    Aviation Maintenance and            16,608          16,608
                                                       Support Complex.
                            Bahrain Island
Navy                          Sw Asia                 P-8a Hangar...............          27,826          27,826
                            California
Navy                          Bridgeport              E-Lmr Communications                16,180          16,180
                                                       Towers.
Navy                          San Diego               Steam Distribution System           47,110          47,110
                                                       Decentralization.
                            District of Columbia
Navy                          District of Columbia    Electronics Science and             31,735          31,735
                                                       Technology Laboratory.
                            Djibouti
Navy                          Camp Lemonier,          Entry Control Point.......           9,923           9,923
                               Djibouti
                            Florida
Navy                          Jacksonville            Mh60 Parking Apron........           8,583           8,583
Navy                          Jacksonville            P-8a Runway Thresholds and          21,652          21,652
                                                       Taxiways.
Navy                          Mayport                 Lcs Operational Training            20,520          20,520
                                                       Facility.
                            Guam
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Gse Shops at North Ramp...          21,880          21,880
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Mwss Facilities at North            28,771          28,771
                                                       Ramp.
                            Hawaii
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Facility Modifications for          51,182          51,182
                                                       Vmu, Mwsd, & Ch53e.
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Road and Infrastructure              2,200           2,200
                                                       Improvements.
Navy                          Pearl Harbor            Submarine Maneuvering Room           9,698           9,698
                                                       Trainer Facility.
                            Japan
Navy                          Iwakuni                 Security Mods Dpri Mc167-T           6,415           6,415
                                                       (Cvw-5 E2d Ea-18g).
Navy                          Kadena Ab               Aircraft Maint Hangar               19,411          19,411
                                                       Alterations and Sap-F.
Navy                          MCAS Futenma            Hangar & Rinse Facility              4,639           4,639
                                                       Modernizations.
Navy                          Okinawa                 Lhd Practice Site                   35,685          35,685
                                                       Improvements.
                            Maryland
Navy                          Annapolis               Center for Cyber Security          120,112         100,112
                                                       Studies Building.
Navy                          Indian Head             Advanced Energetics                 15,346          15,346
                                                       Research Lab Complex Ph 2.
Navy                          Patuxent River          Atlantic Test Range                  9,860           9,860
                                                       Facility.
                            Nevada
Navy                          Fallon                  Air Wing Training Facility          27,763          27,763
Navy                          Fallon                  Facility Alteration for F-           3,499           3,499
                                                       35 Training Mission.
                            North Carolina
Navy                          Cherry Point Marine     Water Treatment Plant               41,588          41,588
                               Corps Air Station       Replacement.
                            Pennsylvania
Navy                          Philadelphia            Ohio Replacement Power &            23,985          23,985
                                                       Propulsion Facility.
                            South Carolina
Navy                          Charleston              Nuclear Power Operational           35,716          35,716
                                                       Support Facility.
                            Spain
Navy                          Rota                    Ship Berthing Power                 20,233          20,233
                                                       Upgrades.
                            Virginia
Navy                          Dahlgren                Missile Support Facility..          27,313          27,313
Navy                          Norfolk                 EOD Consolidated Ops &              39,274          39,274
                                                       Logistics Facilities.
Navy                          Portsmouth              Submarine Maintenance                9,743           9,743
                                                       Facility.
Navy                          Quantico                Ammunition Supply Point             12,613          12,613
                                                       Expansion.
Navy                          Yorktown                Bachelor Enlisted Quarters          19,152          19,152
Navy                          Yorktown                Fast Company Training                7,836           7,836
                                                       Facility.
                            Washington
Navy                          Bremerton               Integrated Water Treatment          16,401          16,401
                                                       Syst. Dd 1, 2, & 5.
Navy                          Kitsap                  Explosives Handling Wharf           83,778          83,778
                                                       #2 (Inc).
Navy                          Port Angeles            Tps Port Angeles Forward            20,638          20,638
                                                       Operating Location.
Navy                          Whidbey Island          P-8a Aircraft Apron and             24,390          24,390
                                                       Supporting Facilities.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Navy                          Unspecified Worldwide   F-35c Facility Addition             16,594          16,594
                               Locations               and Modification.
Navy                          Unspecified Worldwide   F-35c Operational Training          22,391          22,391
                               Locations               Facility.
Navy                          Unspecified Worldwide   Mcon Design Funds.........          33,366          33,366
                               Locations
Navy                          Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    7,163           7,163
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Navy                                               1,018,772         998,772
                              ......................
                            Alaska
AF                            Clear AFS               Emergency Power Plant Fuel          11,500          11,500
                                                       Storage.
                            Arizona
AF                            Luke AFB                F-35 Aircraft Mx Hangar--           11,200          11,200
                                                       Sqdn #2.
AF                            Luke AFB                F-35 Flightline Fillstands          15,600          15,600
                            Guam
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Guam Strike Fuel Systems            64,000          64,000
                                                       Maint.hangar Inc 2.

[[Page 8718]]

 
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Prtc--Combat Comm Infrastr           3,750           3,750
                                                       Facility.
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Prtc--Red Horse Logistics            3,150           3,150
                                                       Facility.
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Prtc--Satellite Fire                 6,500           6,500
                                                       Station.
                            Kansas
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Adal Mobility Bag             2,300           2,300
                                                       Strg Expansion.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Adal Regional Mx             16,100          16,100
                                                       Tng Facility.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Alter Composite Mx            4,100           4,100
                                                       Shop.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Alter Taxiway                 5,500           5,500
                                                       Foxtrot.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Fuselage Trainer...           6,400           6,400
                            Maryland
AF                            Fort Meade              Cybercom Joint Operations          166,000         166,000
                                                       Center, Increment 2.
                            Massachusetts
AF                            Hanscom AFB             Dormitory (72 Rm).........          13,500          13,500
                            Nebraska
AF                            Offutt AFB              Usstratcom Replacement             180,000         180,000
                                                       Facility- Incr 4.
                            Nevada
AF                            Nellis AFB              F-22 Flight Simulator               14,000          14,000
                                                       Facility.
AF                            Nellis AFB              F-35 Aircraft Mx Unit--4            31,000          31,000
                                                       Bay Hangar.
AF                            Nellis AFB              F-35 Weapons School                  8,900           8,900
                                                       Facility.
                            New Jersey
AF                            Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Fire Station..............           5,900           5,900
                               Lakehurst
                            Oklahoma
AF                            Tinker AFB              KC-46a Depot Maint Complex          48,000          48,000
                                                       Spt Infrastr.
AF                            Tinker AFB              KC-46a Two-Bay Depot Mx             63,000          63,000
                                                       Hangar.
                            Texas
AF                            Joint Base San Antonio  Fire Station..............           5,800           5,800
                            United Kingdom
AF                            Croughton Raf           Jiac Consolidation--Phase           92,223          92,223
                                                       1.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
AF                            Various Worldwide       Planning and Design.......          10,738          10,738
                               Locations
AF                            Various Worldwide       Unspecified Minor Military          22,613          22,613
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Air Force                                            811,774         811,774
                              ......................
                            Arizona
Def-Wide                      Fort Huachuca           Jitc Building 52120                  1,871           1,871
                                                       Renovation.
                            Australia
Def-Wide                      Geraldton               Combined Communications              9,600           9,600
                                                       Gateway Geraldton.
                            Belgium
Def-Wide                      Brussels                Brussells Elementary/High           41,626          41,626
                                                       School Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Brussels                NATO Headquarters Facility          37,918          37,918
                            California
Def-Wide                      Camp Pendleton,         SOF Comm/Elec Maintenance           11,841          11,841
                               California              Facility.
Def-Wide                      Coronado                SOF Logistics Support Unit          41,740          41,740
                                                       1 Ops Facility #1.
Def-Wide                      Coronado                SOF Support Activity Ops            28,600          28,600
                                                       Facility #2.
Def-Wide                      Lemoore                 Replace Fuel Storage &              52,500          52,500
                                                       Distribution Fac..
                            Colorado
Def-Wide                      Peterson AFB            Dental Clinic Replacement.          15,200          15,200
                            Conus
Def-Wide                      Various Locations       East Coast Missile Site                  0          20,000
                                                       Planning and Design.
                            Conus Classified
Def-Wide                      Classified Location     SOF Skills Training                 53,073          53,073
                                                       Facility.
                            Georgia
Def-Wide                      Hunter Army Airfield    SOF Company Operations               7,692           7,692
                                                       Facility.
Def-Wide                      Robins AFB              Replace Hydrant Fuel                19,900          19,900
                                                       System.
                            Germany
Def-Wide                      Rhine Ordnance          Medical Center Replacement         259,695         189,695
                               Barracks                Incr 4.
                            Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Def-Wide                      Guantanamo Bay          Replace Fuel Tank.........          11,100          11,100
Def-Wide                      Guantanamo Bay          W.t. Sampson E/M and Hs             65,190          65,190
                                                       Consolid./Replacement.
                            Hawaii
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Pearl        Replace Fuel Tanks........           3,000           3,000
                               Harbor-Hickam
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Pearl        Upgrade Fire Supression &           49,900          49,900
                               Harbor-Hickam           Ventilation Sys..
                            Japan
Def-Wide                      Misawa Ab               Edgren High School                  37,775          37,775
                                                       Renovation.
Def-Wide                      Okinawa                 Killin Elementary                   71,481          71,481
                                                       Replacement/Renovation.
Def-Wide                      Okinawa                 Kubasaki High School                99,420          99,420
                                                       Replacement/Renovation.
Def-Wide                      Sasebo                  E.j. King High School               37,681          37,681
                                                       Replacement/Renovation.
                            Kentucky
Def-Wide                      Fort Campbell,          SOF System Integration              18,000          18,000
                               Kentucky                Maintenance Office Fac.
                            Maryland
Def-Wide                      Fort Meade              NSAW Campus Feeders Phase           54,207          54,207
                                                       1.
Def-Wide                      Fort Meade              NSAW Recapitalize Building          45,521          45,521
                                                       #1/Site M Inc 3.
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Andrews      Construct Hydrant Fuel              18,300          18,300
                                                       System.
                            Michigan
Def-Wide                      Selfridge ANGB          Replace Fuel Distribution           35,100          35,100
                                                       Facilities.
                            Mississippi
Def-Wide                      Stennis                 SOF Applied Instruction             10,323          10,323
                                                       Facility.

[[Page 8719]]

 
Def-Wide                      Stennis                 SOF Land Acquisition                17,224          17,224
                                                       Western Maneuver Area.
                            Nevada
Def-Wide                      Fallon                  SOF Tactical Ground Mob.            20,241          20,241
                                                       Vehicle Maint Fac..
                            New Mexico
Def-Wide                      Cannon AFB              SOF Squadron Operations             23,333          23,333
                                                       Facility (Sts).
                            North Carolina
Def-Wide                      Camp Lejeune, North     Lejeune High School                 41,306          41,306
                               Carolina                Addition/Renovation.
Def-Wide                      Camp Lejeune, North     SOF Intel/Ops Expansion...          11,442          11,442
                               Carolina
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Battalion Operations            37,074          37,074
                                                       Facility.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Tactical Equipment               8,000           8,000
                                                       Maintenance Facility.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Training Command                48,062          48,062
                                                       Building.
Def-Wide                      Seymour Johnson AFB     Replace Hydrant Fuel                 8,500           8,500
                                                       System.
                            South Carolina
Def-Wide                      Beaufort                Replace Fuel Distribution           40,600          40,600
                                                       Facilities.
                            South Dakota
Def-Wide                      Ellsworth AFB           Construct Hydrant System..           8,000           8,000
                            Texas
Def-Wide                      Fort Bliss              Hospital Replacement Incr          131,500         201,500
                                                       6.
Def-Wide                      Joint Base San Antonio  Medical Clinic Replacement          38,300          38,300
                            Virginia
Def-Wide                      Craney Island           Replace & Alter Fuel                36,500          36,500
                                                       Distribution Facilities.
Def-Wide                      Def Distribution Depot  Replace Access Control               5,700           5,700
                               Richmond                Point.
Def-Wide                      Fort Belvoir            Parking Lot...............           7,239           7,239
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Langley-     Hopsital Addition/Cup               41,200          41,200
                               Eustis                  Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Joint Expeditionary     SOF Human Performance               11,200          11,200
                               Base Little Creek--     Center.
                               Story
Def-Wide                      Joint Expeditionary     SOF Indoor Dynamic Range..          14,888          14,888
                               Base Little Creek--
                               Story
Def-Wide                      Joint Expeditionary     SOF Mobile Comm Det                 13,500          13,500
                               Base Little Creek--     Support Facility.
                               Story
Def-Wide                      Pentagon                Redundant Chilled Water             15,100          15,100
                                                       Loop.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Contingency Construction..           9,000               0
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Ecip Design...............          10,000          10,000
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Energy Conservation                150,000         150,000
                               Locations               Investment Program.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Exercise Related Minor               8,581           8,581
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......             745             745
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......          38,704          18,704
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......           1,183           1,183
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......          42,387          42,387
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......             599             599
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......          24,425           4,425
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    5,932           5,932
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    6,846           6,846
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   10,334          10,334
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    2,700           2,700
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    2,000           2,000
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    4,100           4,100
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor Milcon..           2,994           2,994
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Various Worldwide       Planning and Design.......          24,197          24,197
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide                                       2,061,890       2,032,890
                              ......................
                            Kentucky
Chem Demil                    Blue Grass Army Depot   Ammunition                          38,715          38,715
                                                       Demilitarization Ph Xv.
                            ........................
       Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense                              38,715          38,715
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
NATO                          NATO Security           NATO Security Investment           199,700         199,700
                               Investment Program      Program.

[[Page 8720]]

 
                            ........................
       Total NATO Security Investment Program                                            199,700         199,700
                              ......................
                            Delaware
Army NG                       Dagsboro                National Guard Vehicle                   0          10,800
                                                       Maintenance Shop.
                            Maine
Army NG                       Augusta                 National Guard Reserve              30,000          30,000
                                                       Center.
                            Maryland
Army NG                       Havre DE Grace          National Guard Readiness            12,400          12,400
                                                       Center.
                            Montana
Army NG                       Helena                  National Guard Readiness            38,000          38,000
                                                       Center Add/Alt.
                            New Mexico
Army NG                       Alamogordo              National Guard Readiness                 0           5,000
                                                       Center.
                            North Dakota
Army NG                       Valley City             National Guard Vehicle              10,800          10,800
                                                       Maintenance Shop.
                            Vermont
Army NG                       North Hyde Park         National Guard Vehicle               4,400           4,400
                                                       Maintenance Shop.
                            Washington
Army NG                       Yakima                  Enlisted Barracks,                       0          19,000
                                                       Transient Training.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Army NG                       Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......          17,600          17,600
                               Locations
Army NG                       Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   13,720          13,720
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Army National Guard                                  126,920         161,720
                              ......................
                            California
Army Res                      Fresno                  Army Reserve Center/AMSA..          22,000          22,000
Army Res                      March (Riverside)       Army Reserve Center.......               0          25,000
                            Colorado
Army Res                      Fort Carson, Colorado   Training Building Addition           5,000           5,000
                            Illinois
Army Res                      Arlington Heights       Army Reserve Center.......               0          26,000
                            Mississippi
Army Res                      Starkville              Army Reserve Center.......               0           9,300
                            New Jersey
Army Res                      Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Army Reserve Center.......          26,000          26,000
                               Lakehurst
                            New York
Army Res                      Mattydale               Army Reserve Center/AMSA..          23,000          23,000
                            Virginia
Army Res                      Fort Lee                Tass Training Center......          16,000          16,000
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Army Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design.......           8,337           8,337
                               Locations
Army Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                    3,609           3,609
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Army Reserve                                         103,946         164,246
                              ......................
                            Pennsylvania
N/MC Res                      Pittsburgh              Reserve Training Center--           17,650          17,650
                                                       Pittsburgh, PA.
                            Washington
N/MC Res                      Whidbey Island          C-40 Aircraft Maintenance           27,755          27,755
                                                       Hangar.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
N/MC Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Mcnr Planning & Design....           2,123           2,123
                               Locations
N/MC Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Mcnr Unspecified Minor               4,000           4,000
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve                         51,528          51,528
                              ......................
                            Connecticut
Air NG                        Bradley IAP             Construct C-130 Fuel Cell           16,306          16,306
                                                       and Corrosion Contr.
                            Iowa
Air NG                        Des Moines Map          Remotely Piloted Aircraft            8,993           8,993
                                                       and Targeting Group.
                            Michigan
Air NG                        W. K. Kellog Regional   Rpa Beddown...............           6,000           6,000
                               Airport
                            New Hampshire
Air NG                        Pease International     KC-46a Adal Airfield                 7,100           7,100
                               Trade Port              Pavements & Hydrant Syst.
Air NG                        Pease International     KC-46a Adal Fuel Cell               16,800          16,800
                               Trade Port              Building 253.
Air NG                        Pease International     KC-46a Adal Maint Hangar            18,002          18,002
                               Trade Port              Building 254.
                            Pennsylvania
Air NG                        Willow Grove Arf        Rpa Operations Center.....           5,662           5,662
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Air NG                        Various Worldwide       Planning and Design.......           7,700           7,700
                               Locations
Air NG                        Various Worldwide       Unspecified Minor                    8,100           8,100
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................

[[Page 8721]]

 
       Total Military Construction, Air National Guard                                    94,663          94,663
                              ......................
                            Georgia
AF Res                        Robins AFB              Afrc Consolidated Mission           27,700          27,700
                                                       Complex, Ph I.
                            North Carolina
AF Res                        Seymour Johnson AFB     KC-135 Tanker Parking                9,800           9,800
                                                       Apron Expansion.
                            Texas
AF Res                        Fort Worth              EOD Facility..............           3,700           3,700
                            Worldwide Unspecified
AF Res                        Various Worldwide       Planning and Design.......           6,892           6,892
                               Locations
AF Res                        Various Worldwide       Unspecified Minor Military           1,400           1,400
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve                                     49,492          49,492
                              ......................
                            Illinois
FH Con Army                   Rock Island             Family Housing New                  19,500          19,500
                                                       Construction.
                            Korea
FH Con Army                   Camp Walker             Family Housing New                  57,800          57,800
                                                       Construction.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Family Housing P & D......           1,309           1,309
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Construction, Army                                            78,609          78,609
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings...............          14,136          14,136
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Leased Housing............         112,504         112,504
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                 65,245          65,245
                               Locations               Property Facilities.
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account........          43,480          43,480
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account........           3,117           3,117
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Military Housing                    20,000          20,000
                               Locations               Privitization Initiative.
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Miscellaneous.............             700             700
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Services..................           9,108           9,108
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities.................          82,686          82,686
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army                                350,976         350,976
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account.......          38,543          38,543
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Housing Privatization.....          40,761          40,761
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing...................          43,651          43,651
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance...............          99,934          99,934
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account........          47,834          47,834
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Miscellaneous Account.....           1,993           1,993
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Services Account..........          12,709          12,709
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account.........          42,322          42,322
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force                                      327,747         327,747
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Design....................             472             472
                               Locations
FH Con Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Improvements..............          15,940          15,940
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps                           16,412          16,412
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account.......          17,881          17,881
                               Locations

[[Page 8722]]

 
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing...................          65,999          65,999
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                 97,612          97,612
                               Locations               Property.
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account........          55,124          55,124
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Miscellaneous Account.....             366             366
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Privatization Support               27,876          27,876
                               Locations               Costs.
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Services Account..........          18,079          18,079
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account.........          71,092          71,092
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps               354,029         354,029
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account.......           3,362           3,362
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account.......              20              20
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account.......             746             746
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing...................          11,179          11,179
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing...................          42,083          42,083
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                  2,128           2,128
                               Locations               Property.
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                    344             344
                               Locations               Property.
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account........             378             378
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Services Account..........              31              31
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account.........             170             170
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account.........             659             659
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide                         61,100          61,100
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FHIF                          Unspecified Worldwide   Family Housing Improvement           1,662           1,662
                               Locations               Fund.
                            ........................
       Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund                                           1,662           1,662
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC                          Base Realignment &      Base Realignment and                84,417          84,417
                               Closure, Army           Closure.
BRAC                          Base Realignment &      Base Realignment & Closure          57,406          57,406
                               Closure, Navy
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Dod BRAC Activities--Air            90,976          90,976
                               Locations               Force.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-100: Planing, Design             7,682           7,682
                               Locations               and Management.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-101: Various Locations          21,416          21,416
                               Locations
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-138: NAS Brunswick, ME             904             904
                               Locations
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-157: Mcsa Kansas City,              40              40
                               Locations               MO.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-172: NWS Seal Beach,             6,066           6,066
                               Locations               Concord, CA.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-84: JRB Willow Grove &           1,178           1,178
                               Locations               Cambria Reg Ap.
                            ........................
       Total Base Realignment and Closure Account                                        270,085         270,085
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   42 Usc 3374...............               0        -100,000
                               Locations
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Army......................               0         -79,577
                               Locations
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   NATO Security Investment                 0         -25,000
                               Locations               Program.
                            ........................

[[Page 8723]]

 
       Total Prior Year Savings                                                                0        -204,577
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
GR                            Unspecified Worldwide   General Reductions........               0         -69,000
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total General Reductions                                                                0         -69,000
                              ......................
      Total Military Construction                                                      6,557,447       6,532,970
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

     SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS (In Thousands
                               of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 FY 2015        House
                   Program                       Request     Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
  Energy And Water Development, And Related
   Agencies
  Appropriation Summary:
    Energy Programs
      Nuclear Energy........................       104,000       104,000
 
    Atomic Energy Defense Activities
      National nuclear security
       administration:
        Weapons activities..................     8,314,902     8,462,602
        Defense nuclear nonproliferation....     1,555,156     1,565,156
        Naval reactors......................     1,377,100     1,387,100
        Federal salaries and expenses.......       410,842       386,842
  Total, National nuclear security              11,658,000    11,801,700
   administration...........................
 
      Environmental and other defense
       activities:
        Defense environmental cleanup.......     5,327,538     4,870,538
        Other defense activities............       753,000       758,300
  Total, Environmental & other defense           6,080,538     5,628,838
   activities...............................
  Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities...    17,738,538    17,430,538
  Total, Discretionary Funding..............    17,842,538    17,534,538
 
Nuclear Energy
  Idaho sitewide safeguards and security....       104,000       104,000
 
Weapons Activities
  Directed stockpile work
    Life extension programs
      B61 Life extension program............       643,000       643,000
      W76 Life extension program............       259,168       273,768
      W88 Alt 370...........................       165,400       166,600
      Cruise missile warhead life extension          9,418        17,018
       program..............................
  Total, Life extension programs............     1,076,986     1,100,386
 
    Stockpile systems
      B61 Stockpile systems.................       109,615       109,615
      W76 Stockpile systems.................        45,728        45,728
      W78 Stockpile systems.................        62,703        66,403
      W80 Stockpile systems.................        70,610        70,610
      B83 Stockpile systems.................        63,136        63,136
      W87 Stockpile systems.................        91,255        91,255
      W88 Stockpile systems.................        88,060        88,060
  Total, Stockpile systems..................       531,107       534,807
 
    Weapons dismantlement and disposition
      Operations and maintenance............        30,008        30,008
 
    Stockpile services
      Production support....................       350,942       363,242
      Research and development support......        29,649        29,649
      R&D certification and safety..........       201,479       212,479
      Management, technology, and production       241,805       241,805
      Plutonium sustainment.................       144,575       172,875
      Tritium readiness.....................       140,053       140,053
  Total, Stockpile services.................     1,108,503     1,160,103
  Total, Directed stockpile work............     2,746,604     2,825,304
 

[[Page 8724]]

 
  Campaigns:
    Science campaign
      Advanced certification................        58,747        58,747
      Primary assessment technologies.......       112,000       112,000
      Dynamic materials properties..........       117,999       117,999
      Advanced radiography..................        79,340        79,340
      Secondary assessment technologies.....        88,344        88,344
  Total, Science campaign...................       456,430       456,430
 
    Engineering campaign
      Enhanced surety.......................        52,003        54,403
      Weapon systems engineering assessment         20,832        20,832
       technology...........................
      Nuclear survivability.................        25,371        25,371
      Enhanced surveillance.................        37,799        41,399
  Total, Engineering campaign...............       136,005       142,005
 
    Inertial confinement fusion ignition and
     high yield campaign
      Ignition..............................        77,994        77,994
      Support of other stockpile programs...        23,598        23,598
      Diagnostics, cryogenics and                   61,297        61,297
       experimental support.................
      Pulsed power inertial confinement              5,024         5,024
       fusion...............................
      Joint program in high energy density           9,100         9,100
       laboratory plasmas...................
      Facility operations and target               335,882       335,882
       production...........................
  Total, Inertial confinement fusion and           512,895       512,895
   high yield campaign......................
 
    Advanced simulation and computing              610,108       610,108
     campaign...............................
 
    Nonnuclear Readiness Campaign...........       125,909       125,909
  Total, Campaigns..........................     1,841,347     1,847,347
 
  Readiness in technical base and facilities
   (RTBF)
    Operations of facilities
    Kansas City Plant.......................       125,000       125,000
      Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory        71,000        71,000
      Los Alamos National Laboratory........       198,000       198,000
      Nevada National Security Site.........        89,000        89,000
      Pantex................................        75,000        75,000
      Sandia National Laboratory............       106,000       106,000
      Savannah River Site...................        81,000        81,000
      Y-12 National security complex........       151,000       151,000
  Total, Operations of facilities...........       896,000       896,000
 
    Program readiness.......................       136,700       136,700
    Material recycle and recovery...........       138,900       138,900
    Containers..............................        26,000        26,000
    Storage.................................        40,800        40,800
    Maintenance and repair of facilities....       205,000       220,000
    Recapitalization........................       209,321       248,321
  Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and        756,721       810,721
   facilities...............................
 
    Construction:
      15-D-613 Emergency Operations Center,          2,000         2,000
       Y-12.................................
      15-D-612 Emergency Operations Center,          2,000         2,000
       LLNL.................................
      15-D-611 Emergency Operations Center,          4,000         4,000
       SNL..................................
      15-D-301 HE Science & Engineering             11,800        11,800
       Facility, PX.........................
      15-D-302, TA-55 Reinvestment project,         16,062        16,062
       Phase 3, LANL........................
      12-D-301 TRU waste facilities, LANL...         6,938         6,938
      11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project           10,000        10,000
       Phase 2, LANL........................
      07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste             15,000        15,000
       treatment facility upgrade project,
       LANL.................................
      06-D-141 PED/Construction, Uranium           335,000       335,000
       Capabilities Replacement Project Y-12
  Total, Construction.......................       402,800       402,800
  Total, Readiness in technical base and         2,055,521     2,109,521
   facilities...............................
 
  Secure transportation asset
    Operations and equipment................       132,851       132,851
    Program direction.......................       100,962       100,962
  Total, Secure transportation asset........       233,813       233,813
 
  Nuclear counterterrorism incident response       173,440       182,440
 
  Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation         76,901        76,901
   Programs.................................
 
  Site stewardship
    Environmental projects and operations...        53,000        53,000
    Nuclear materials integration...........        16,218        16,218
    Minority serving institution                    13,231        13,231
     partnerships program...................
  Total, Site stewardship...................        82,449        82,449
 

[[Page 8725]]

 
  Defense nuclear security
    Operations and maintenance..............       618,123       618,123
  Total, Defense nuclear security...........       618,123       618,123
 
  Information technology and cybersecurity..       179,646       179,646
 
  Legacy contractor pensions................       307,058       307,058
  Total, Weapons Activities.................     8,314,902     8,462,602
 
 
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
  Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs
    Global threat reduction initiative......       333,488       413,488
 
    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
      Operations and maintenance............       360,808       430,808
 
    Nonproliferation and international             141,359       177,759
     security...............................
 
    International material protection and          305,467       129,067
     cooperation............................
 
    Fissile materials disposition
      U.S. surplus fissile materials
       disposition
        Operations and maintenance
          U.S. plutonium disposition........        85,000        85,000
          U.S. uranium disposition..........        25,000        25,000
  Total, Operations and maintenance.........       110,000       110,000
        Construction:
          99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel                196,000       196,000
           fabrication facility, Savannah
           River, SC........................
          99-D-141-02 Waste Solidification           5,125         5,125
           Building, Savannah River, SC.....
  Total, Construction.......................       201,125       201,125
  Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials            311,125       311,125
   disposition..............................
      Russian surplus fissile materials
       disposition
  Total, Fissile materials disposition......       311,125       311,125
  Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation        1,452,247     1,462,247
   Programs.................................
 
  Legacy contractor pensions................       102,909       102,909
  Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation...     1,555,156     1,565,156
 
 
Naval Reactors
  Naval reactors operations and                    412,380       422,380
   infrastructure...........................
  Naval reactors development................       425,700       425,700
  Ohio replacement reactor systems                 156,100       156,100
   development..............................
  S8G Prototype refueling...................       126,400       126,400
  Program direction.........................        46,600        46,600
  Construction:
    15-D-904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion            400           400
     3......................................
    15-D-903 KL Fire System Upgrade.........           600           600
    15-D-902 KS Engineroom team trainer              1,500         1,500
     facility...............................
    15-D-901 KS Central office building and         24,000        24,000
     prototype staff facility...............
    14-D-901 Spent fuel handling                   141,100       141,100
     recapitalization project, NRF..........
    13-D-905 Remote-handled low-level waste         14,420        14,420
     facility, INL..........................
    13-D-904 KS Radiological work and               20,100        20,100
     storage building, KSO..................
    10-D-903, Security upgrades, KAPL.......         7,400         7,400
    08-D-190 Expended Core Facility M-290              400           400
     receiving/discharge station, Naval
     Reactor Facility, ID...................
  Total, Construction.......................       209,920       209,920
  Total, Naval Reactors.....................     1,377,100     1,387,100
 
 
Federal Salaries And Expenses
  Program direction.........................       410,842       386,842
  Total, Office Of The Administrator........       410,842       386,842
 
 
Defense Environmental Cleanup
  Closure sites:
    Closure sites administration............         4,889         4,889
 
  Hanford site:
    River corridor and other cleanup               332,788       332,788
     operations.............................
    Central plateau remediation:
      Central plateau remediation...........       474,292       474,292
    Construction:
      15-D-401 Containerized sludge (Rl-            26,290        26,290
       0012)................................
  Total, Central plateau remediation........       500,582       500,582
    Richland community and regulatory               14,701        14,701
     support................................
  Total, Hanford site.......................       848,071       848,071

[[Page 8726]]

 
 
  Idaho National Laboratory:
    Idaho cleanup and waste disposition.....       364,293       364,293
    Idaho community and regulatory support..         2,910         2,910
  Total, Idaho National Laboratory..........       367,203       367,203
 
  NNSA sites
    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory..         1,366         1,366
    Nevada..................................        64,851        64,851
    Sandia National Laboratories............         2,801         2,801
    Los Alamos National Laboratory..........       196,017       196,017
    Construction:
      15-D-406 Hexavalent chromium D & D (Vl-       28,600        28,600
       Lanl-0030)...........................
  Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites....       293,635       293,635
 
  Oak Ridge Reservation:
    OR Nuclear facility D & D
      OR Nuclear facility D & D.............        73,155        73,155
      Construction:
        14-D-403 Outfall 200 Mercury                 9,400         9,400
         Treatment Facility.................
  Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D..........        82,555        82,555
 
    U233 Disposition Program................        41,626        41,626
 
    OR cleanup and disposition:
      OR cleanup and disposition............        71,137        71,137
      Construction:
        15-D-405--Sludge Buildout...........         4,200         4,200
  Total, OR cleanup and disposition.........        75,337        75,337
 
  OR reservation community and regulatory            4,365         4,365
   support..................................
  Solid waste stabilization and disposition,         3,000         3,000
   Oak Ridge technology development.........
  Total, Oak Ridge Reservation..............       206,883       206,883
 
  Office of River Protection:
    Waste treatment and immobilization plant
      01-D-416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major                575,000       575,000
       construction.........................
      01-D-16E Pretreatment facility........       115,000       115,000
  Total, Waste treatment and immobilization        690,000       690,000
   plant....................................
 
    Tank farm activities
      Rad liquid tank waste stabilization          522,000       522,000
       and disposition......................
      Construction:
        15-D-409 Low Activity Waste                 23,000        23,000
         Pretreatment System, Hanford.......
  Total, Tank farm activities...............       545,000       545,000
  Total, Office of River protection.........     1,235,000     1,235,000
 
  Savannah River sites:
    Savannah River risk management                 416,276       416,276
     operations.............................
    SR community and regulatory support.....        11,013        11,013
 
    Radioactive liquid tank waste:
      Radioactive liquid tank waste                553,175       553,175
       stabilization and disposition........
      Construction:
        15-D-402--Saltstone Disposal Unit #6        34,642        34,642
        05-D-405 Salt waste processing             135,000       135,000
         facility, Savannah River...........
  Total, Construction.......................       169,642       169,642
  Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste......       722,817       722,817
  Total, Savannah River site................     1,150,106     1,150,106
 
  Waste isolation pilot plant...............       216,020       216,020
 
  Program direction.........................       280,784       280,784
  Program support...........................        14,979        14,979
 
  Safeguards and Security:
    Oak Ridge Reservation...................        16,382        16,382
    Paducah.................................         7,297         7,297
    Portsmouth..............................         8,492         8,492
    Richland/Hanford Site...................        63,668        63,668
    Savannah River Site.....................       132,196       132,196
    Waste Isolation Pilot Project...........         4,455         4,455
    West Valley.............................         1,471         1,471
  Technology development....................        13,007        19,007
  Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup...     4,864,538     4,870,538
 
  Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution..       463,000             0
 

[[Page 8727]]

 
  Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup......     5,327,538     4,870,538
 
 
Other Defense Activities
  Specialized security activities...........       202,152       207,452
 
  Environment, health, safety and security
    Environment, health, safety and security       118,763       118,763
    Program direction.......................        62,235        62,235
  Total, Environment, Health, safety and           180,998       180,998
   security.................................
 
  Independent enterprise assessments
    Independent enterprise assessments......        24,068        24,068
    Program direction.......................        49,466        49,466
  Total, Independent enterprise assessments.        73,534        73,534
 
  Office of Legacy Management
    Legacy management.......................       158,639       158,639
    Program direction.......................        13,341        13,341
  Total, Office of Legacy Management........       171,980       171,980
 
  Defense-related activities
  Defense related administrative support
    Chief financial officer.................        46,877        46,877
    Chief information officer...............        71,959        71,959
  Total, Defense related administrative            118,836       118,836
   support..................................
 
  Office of hearings and appeals............         5,500         5,500
  Subtotal, Other defense activities........       753,000       758,300
  Total, Other Defense Activities...........       753,000       758,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The Acting CHAIR. No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall 
be in order except those printed in House Report 113-455. Each such 
further amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered read, 
shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject 
to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for the division of 
the question.


               Amendment No. 1 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 1 
printed in House Report 113-455.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle D of title I, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 136. PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN RADARS FOR F-15C/D AIRCRAFT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall 
     procure not fewer than 10 active electronically scanned array 
     radars for F-15C/D aircraft of the Air National Guard.
       (b) Funding.--
       (1) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 101 for aircraft procurement, Air 
     Force, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4101, for F-15 APG-63(V)3 upgrades (Line 025) is 
     hereby increased by $100,000,000.
       (2) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amounts authorized to be 
     appropriated in division C for atomic energy defense 
     activities, as specified in the corresponding funding table 
     in section 4701, are reduced for the following purposes 
     relating to weapons activities by the following amounts:
       (A) W76 Life extension program, by $7,900,000.
       (B) W88 Alt 370, by $1,200,000.
       (C) Cruise missile warhead life extension program, by 
     $7,600,000.
       (D) W78 Stockpile systems, by $3,700,000.
       (E) Production support, by $12,300,000.
       (F) Plutonium sustainment, by $28,300,000.
       (G) Recapitalization, by $39,000,000.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman 
from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Oregon.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, as I have been listening to the debate 
this evening following the process, I, too, would offer my 
congratulations to the chair of the committee and the committee itself 
dealing with a very difficult situation. There are lots of pressures. 
They are not just faceless special interests, but we are dealing with 
businesses, with unions, with the military itself, concerns for their 
family, the armed services, and the traditions. All of these things 
make for a very complicated situation.
  But I relate to something Mr. Smith said a moment ago, the ranking 
member, talking about the really hard questions are not really being 
addressed. We are sort of pushing them down the road when the 
administration and the Pentagon offered them forward.
  I am concerned that we have yet to come to grips with the costs of 
between a half-trillion and two-thirds of a trillion dollars for our 
nuclear capacity over the next 10 years. Well, I am offering tonight an 
easy opportunity to deal with something that can make a big difference 
to support thousands of brave men and women who make up the Air 
National Guard, who have proven themselves, especially over the last 13 
years, answering the call of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition 
to protecting the homeland without wavering, they have responded time 
and time again when disaster strikes.
  But I want to focus on one particular area dealing with the Air Guard 
and Reserves' capacity to be able to meet their challenges. My 
amendment would call the question of whether the House is ready to make 
a modest change in other funding levels to support the Air Guard.
  The amendment would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to 
procure 10 Active Electronically Scanned Array radar upgrades for the 
Air Guard's F-15 fleet. We have around the country people who are 
relying upon a variation of the oldest radars, which are late 1970s 
technology that went out of production in 1986. It limits their 
capacity to meet even the most basic of threats and has serious 
maintenance--not just capacity--but maintenance and operational 
problems.

[[Page 8728]]

  I would like to include for the Record this letter of support from 
the National Guard Association of the United States, which shows why 
they so strongly support this amendment.

                                        National Guard Association


                                         of the United States,

                                     Washington, DC, May 19, 2014.
     Hon. Earl Blumenauer,
     Longworth House Office Building,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Congressman Blumenauer: On behalf of the members of 
     the National Guard Association of the United States (NGAUS), 
     I would like to thank you for introducing an amendment to the 
     National Defense Authorization Act of 2015 to increase 
     funding for Air National Guard (ANG) F-15 Active Electronic 
     Scanned Array (AESA) radar upgrade.
       As you may know, the Air Force currently possesses 248 F-
     15C/D aircraft worldwide, with the ANG maintaining 130 (52 
     percent) of those aircraft. Of the 130 F-15 aircraft the ANG 
     maintains, 74 possess the oldest APG-63v(0) radar system. 
     This V(0) radar is a mechanically scanned system and has 
     significant limitations in capability against most threats 
     across the globe.
       Upgrading the F-15 with the APG-63(V)3 AESA radar provides 
     a significant technological advantage for both homeland 
     defense and world-wide operations.
       Additionally, the V(3) is dramatically easier and cheaper 
     to maintain due to its sold state electronics. Studies 
     indicate that the AESA radar generates approximately 800 
     percent more reliability than the V(0) radar. It also allows 
     for true and effective multi-track and attack capability and 
     increased capability against advanced electronic attack and 
     small radar cross section targets.
       Though the President's budget this year provides for $32.5 
     million for ANG radar upgrades, NGAUS believes additional 
     funding on top of this request will help to maintain parity 
     amongst the Combat Air Force's F-15 in the Active and the 
     National Guard. Considering the Air Force will have to 
     maintain F-15s for the foreseeable future, we believe it is 
     paramount to ensure additional upgrades to the ANG fleet.
       NGAUS supports your efforts in the House to increase 
     funding for ANG F-15 AESA radar upgrades.
       Thank you for your leadership and strong support on this 
     issue and of our National Guard.
           Sincerely,

                                                  Gus Hargett,

                                        Major General, USA, (Ret),
                                                  NGAUS President.

  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, an upgrade for these 10 operating 
systems would not only provide significant technological advantage for 
both homeland defense and worldwide operation, but it would--and this 
is very important--it is actually going to save money over the next 10 
years. It is much easier and cheaper than to maintain the current 
outmoded radars. A small, upfront investment makes our F-15 fighter 
pilots safer and more effective and saves money in the long run.
  Looking for offsets is obviously difficult to do, but what we have 
done is identify modest reductions in areas that are already far in 
excess of what the President has requested. In some cases, they are 
even an additional increment above that which has been offered by the 
committee in its proposal.
  I would hope that the House would approve this modest reduction in 
these seven accounts. It is not going to undercut our nuclear 
deterrent, but it will make a huge difference for the men and women who 
serve in the Air National Guard in terms of their safety, their 
effectiveness, and in the long run will save money.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
  Mr. Chairman, this amendment is part of a long running effort to 
reduce funding for an already chronically underfunded nuclear 
deterrent. Advocates of unilateral U.S. disarmament try unsuccessfully 
each year to cut nuclear weapons funding. We see it on the NDAA, we see 
it on the appropriations bills, and we see it in stand-alone bills.
  For instance, in February, the gentleman from Oregon introduced H.R. 
4107, the REIN-IN Act. The bill would devastate our nuclear deterrent 
by mandating the following: reducing the number of ICBMs from 450 to 
150 and delay development of follow-on systems, cutting the number of 
ballistic missile submarines from 12 to eight, delaying development of 
the nuclear-capable, long-range bomber, prohibiting the F-35 from being 
nuclear capable, and terminating several nuclear infrastructure 
modernization construction projects.
  The amendment we are considering today is part of the broader effort 
that you will see reflected in that bill. It is part of the Disarm-
America agenda that is so dangerous to U.S. nuclear security and our 
international stability. Let's call this amendment what it is: a sly 
attempt to undercut and undermine our nuclear deterrent by pitting us 
against the Air National Guard. It is a unilateral disarmament, and I 
stand here in firm opposition.
  The offset of this amendment is also bad policy. Over the last 3 
years, the Department of Energy's nuclear weapons program is already a 
total of $2 billion short of the funding the administration committed 
in 2010. The administration committed to this funding to win 
ratification of the New START treaty. Now that it is a treaty, it is 
unwilling to request the money the nuclear deterrent needs.
  We must hold the administration to its commitment, provide the money, 
and oppose this amendment. I strongly urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' 
on this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. May I inquire as to the amount of time I have 
remaining?
  The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Oregon has 1 minute 
remaining.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio 
(Mr. Turner), my friend and colleague.
  Mr. TURNER. I want to join Chairman Rogers in his effort to oppose 
this amendment.
  Mr. Chair, as we know, this is one of the annual reoccurring 
Representative Blumenauer's reductions of nuclear weapons efforts. And 
I would support reducing spending on nuclear weapons if we were talking 
about Mr. Putin's reducing his funding on nuclear weapons or Russia 
reducing their funding on nuclear weapons, which we know they are not 
going to do.
  So this is a continued unfortunate exercise of discussing unilateral 
reductions in the United States' funding its nuclear weapon deterrent, 
which is a dangerous thing to do, especially as Mr. Putin is continuing 
his efforts to escalate conflict throughout the world and also is 
looking to increase his overall nuclear weapons capability.
  Now, the other thing is, this isn't even needed. The bill already 
provides the budget request level of $117.5 million to purchase 17 of 
these radars that would be purchased under this amendment, 15 of which 
will go to the Air Guard, and it is certainly a prudent and efficient 
investment, but, additionally, the HASC bill also funds the National 
Guard and Reserve equipment account, which, if the Air Guard really 
thought they needed these radars, they could go buy them from that 
without turning to our nuclear deterrent.
  So why would this be damaging? Well, already, the DOD nuclear 
activities are $2 billion short of their 2010 commitment, and our 
deferred maintenance across the DOD, the deferred maintenance--stuff 
that we need to be fixing that we are not fixing--has a backlog of $3.5 
billion, and this amendment would take another $39 million out of that 
effort to satisfy that backlog.
  This should, as Chairman Rogers said, be seen exactly for what it is, 
another effort to unilaterally reduce the nuclear deterrent of the 
United States. I think this would be a better focus if it was focused 
on Russia, and it certainly does nothing to improve the overall 
capability of our Air National Guard. They have all the resources that 
they would need.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. It is laughable to say that our Air National Guard 
has all the resources they need. It is not true. And I have entered 
into the Record argument to the contrary from the people who are 
actually administering it.
  I am happy to debate our REIN-IN legislation, which would be $100 
billion. We have far more than we need and can afford. But what I am 
talking about is $100 million for items that are specified that are 
modest reductions that aren't

[[Page 8729]]

going to cripple us and will give the Air National Guard a modern, 
updated radar system that makes them safer and more efficient.
  This is an example of the tradeoffs, sadly, that are not part of this 
bill that we do need to make. Sooner or later, the day of reckoning 
will come. In the meantime, this is a small gesture to help approve the 
capacity of the Air National Guard, and I urge its adoption.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield 15 seconds 
to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner) to respond.
  Mr. TURNER. As Mr. Blumenauer knows, my comment is that they have all 
the resources they need to make a decision to purchase these radars. 
Everyone knows that this bill is underfunded, and it certainly 
underfunded nuclear weapons, and your bill, your amendment would only 
further reduce our nuclear weapons capability.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas 
(Mr. Thornberry).
  Mr. THORNBERRY. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, the centerpiece of our national security is our nuclear 
deterrent, and we have neglected it terribly for years, both in the 
administration and in Congress, and we have got a lot of catching up to 
do.
  So as the gentleman from Ohio said and the administration itself 
says, we have a $3.5 billion maintenance backlog on our facilities. 
Thirty percent of the facilities we are using were built during the 
Manhattan Project, and 50 percent of the facilities we are using are 
more than 40 years old.
  Now, we are fortunate that we have got some engineers and other 
highly skilled workers who are willing to work in those conditions, but 
they are not going to be willing to work in it forever. And so this 
bill doesn't solve that problem by any stretch of the imagination, but 
at least this extra $39 billion helps it from getting too much worse. 
It takes a step in the right direction.
  These nuclear weapons are aging machines, just like the facilities 
are aging machines, and they require care and trading out parts if the 
people who have to work around them are going to be safe. That is why 
it is a mistake to take away from this central element of our facility.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon will 
be postponed.

                              {time}  2045


                 Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Gohmert

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 2 
printed in House Report 113-455.
  Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. AUTHORIZING COMMANDERS TO PERMIT MEMBERS OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES TO CARRY A FIREARM ON A MILITARY 
                   INSTALLATION.

       (a) General Authorization.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, regulation, or directive, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall--
       (1) authorize DoD personnel to openly carry a loaded 
     firearm for the purpose of providing 24-hour security 
     monitoring in order to ensure the safety of DoD military and 
     civilian personnel and their dependents who reside on 
     military installations; or
       (2) establish and carry out a procedure to permit qualified 
     military personnel to openly carry a loaded firearm on a 
     military installation for personal protection.
       (b) Commander Control Over Authorization.--Commanders at 
     all levels will exercise sufficient control over 
     authorizations involving the carrying of firearms in 
     accordance with subsection (a).
       (c) Security Monitoring Duty Roster Program.--The 
     authorization described in subsection (a)(1)--
       (1) is in addition to other programs that permit DoD 
     personnel to perform law enforcement and security duties;
       (2) shall be carried out as a program on the duty roster; 
     and
       (3) at a minimum, include placing security personnel at all 
     points of entry into barracks and multi-family residences on 
     military installation.
       (d) Qualified Military Personnel Defined.--For purposes of 
     subsection (a)(2), the term ``qualified military personnel'' 
     means a member of the armed forces on active duty who--
       (1) has passed a gun safety course that is certified by any 
     State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or 
     possession of the United States as providing adequate 
     training to enable the member to carry a concealed handgun in 
     such State, the District of Columbia, or such territory or 
     possession;
       (2) is not the subject of any disciplinary action under the 
     Uniform Code of Military Justice for an assaultive offense 
     that could result in incarceration or separation from the 
     Armed Forces under other than honorable conditions;
       (3) meets annual eligibility requirements for use of any 
     military firearm, as established by the Secretary of the 
     military department concerned;
       (4) passes a background check, as established by the 
     Secretary of the military department concerned;
       (5) passes a psychological evaluation, as established by 
     the Secretary of the military department concerned;
       (6) is not under the influence of alcohol or another 
     intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and
       (7) is not prohibited by Federal law from receiving a 
     firearm.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman 
from Texas (Mr. Gohmert) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.
  Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield to the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon), the chairman of the committee, for a 
colloquy.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank the gentleman. We just had 
a little discussion. The amendment he plans on presenting tonight is 
something that we have not in the committee been able to hold hearings 
on and to really discuss fully in the committee.
  It didn't come up at the full committee or the subcommittee level, 
but he has an issue that is very important to him, it is very important 
to his State, it is very important to many people around this Nation.
  What I told him is that this is the start of a process. It is a 
continuation of a process that we started in January with hearings, 
with subcommittee hearings, with subcommittee markups, and full 
committee markups, but we are not even halfway through the process yet.
  After we pass our bill on the floor, the Senate is marking their bill 
up this week, and at some point, they will mark it on the floor, and 
then there will be a conference, so there is much to do between now and 
the end.
  Mr. GOHMERT. Reclaiming my time, my concern has been when we had a 
second shooting without the administration having done anything after 
the first Fort Hood shooting and then we have a second Fort Hood 
shooting 4\1/2\ years later, it made no sense not to do something.
  My own feeling was we should just allow all of our military members, 
they may be carrying automatic weapons, they may be authorized to shoot 
RPGs, drop bombs, all kinds of weapons in a foreign theater, why 
shouldn't they be able to carry weapons on military installations here 
in the United States?
  So my first amendment was simply to just allow every military member 
to carry, and then the issue came open or concealed. There are some 
commanders that have an issue both ways.
  In talking to other commanders, some commanders have said: look, 
there are some people overseas we don't let carry weapons, and we know 
from experience that some have returned where you have someone 
suffering potentially from PTSD that needs to be checked out.
  So commanders have encouraged that: gee, if that is going to happen, 
we ought to be able to check them out.

[[Page 8730]]

  Everybody knows nobody stands stronger for Second Amendment rights 
than me, but when you are in the military, you do give up certain 
rights, including free speech and freedom of assembly; and so it 
shouldn't be inappropriate to have someone go through an extra check 
before they were allowed to carry.
  Then bowing further to current commanders and former commanders like 
Jerry Boykin--former Delta Force--thought, gee, we can give them a 
choice, either have a duty roster where people walk around with 
weapons, and that would discourage further shooting because, clearly, 
as an article by Arthur Berg says in The Wall Street Journal, these 
people want to conclude it themselves. If they are afraid someone will 
shoot them before they conclude it, then that would not be--they 
wouldn't be going through it.
  So those are all things that motivate my amendment being filed, and 
the chairman here tells me that this is an issue that they would like 
to push in conference with the Senate bill that will be brought 
through.
  Since there is an ongoing concern about what would be the best way to 
do this, as I have experienced with commanders I have talked to, I have 
been encouraged--and not in a bad way--that this would be a way that we 
could do it, I would be consulted on what was being done in conference 
and that it would be brought up there.
  As a result, based on the assurances of my friend, the chairman, I 
ask unanimous consent to withdraw my amendment at this time.
  The Acting CHAIR. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman 
from Texas?
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Reserving the right to object, I just want 
to talk for a moment or two. I hear all that, and I am happy to have 
the amendment withdrawn. I think this is a bad idea from our side of 
the aisle. I have talked to a lot of people in the military, and they 
are deeply concerned about the notion of allowing people to be armed on 
base at all times. The command structure issues that you mentioned and 
the rights that are given up, this is something that we would strongly 
oppose.
  I just want to make sure for the Record a colloquy doesn't put 
something in conference, okay? I don't know what the Senate is going to 
do. There is nothing in our bill on this. If there is nothing in the 
Senate bill, it ain't in conference. So, if you want to withdraw it and 
keep working on the Senate, that is fine. I just want to make sure that 
we don't have some record here that thinks that, with this colloquy, it 
makes this a conference issue.
  The Acting CHAIR. Does the gentleman from Washington withdraw his 
reservation?


                         Parliamentary Inquiry

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, point of parliamentary 
inquiry, a colloquy does not put an issue in a position to be in 
conference, does it? It has to be in either the House or the Senate 
bill?
  The Acting CHAIR. That is a matter for debate.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. All right. Well, if the purpose is to 
withdraw the amendment, I will withdraw my reservation of objection.
  The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is withdrawn.
  There was no objection.


      Amendment No. 3 Offered by Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 3 
printed in House Report 113-455.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment 
at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 270, line 11, strike ``REACTORS.'' and insert 
     ``REACTORS, AND DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION.''.
       Page 270, line 20, insert ``or for other national security 
     purposes,'' before ``the Secretary of Defense may''.
       Page 270, line 25, insert ``, defense nuclear 
     nonproliferation programs,'' before ``or weapons 
     activities''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentlewoman 
from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez) and a Member opposed each will 
control 5 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from California.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such 
time as I may consume.
  Mr. Chairman, every day, the United States faces an extremely urgent 
and dangerous threat, and this threat goes beyond the traditional 
dangers of states possessing nuclear weapons.
  What I am talking about right now is the very real possibility of 
these dangerous materials landing in the hands of terrorist 
organizations. Because of this real threat, I know that there is no one 
in this Chamber who will deny the importance of nonproliferation 
programs and how effective they are in combating one of the greatest 
threats to the United States' security.
  For example, just imagine if Ukraine still had its nuclear materials 
today. Imagine the disaster we would be in as the administration 
endeavored to accelerate the removal of nuclear materials from Ukraine, 
but the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, an incredibly important 
nonproliferation program, could not adequately respond because it 
required additional funds, but the Department of Defense could not 
transfer those necessary funds.
  This is exactly the type of situation we are trying to avoid by 
passing my amendment. Fortunately, the United States removed over 235 
kilograms of highly enriched uranium over 2 years from the two 
remaining sites in Ukraine in 2012. This is enough highly enriched 
uranium to develop more than nine nuclear weapons.
  We do not have the ability to predict the future, especially with 
challenges and threats we will face. This is why we need the ability to 
be flexible. This is essential, and that is exactly what my amendment 
provides.
  The Department of Defense has been transferring approximately $1 
billion per year to NNSA weapons programs, and over the next 5 years, 
DOD will be providing around $1.5 billion annually for NNSA weapons and 
Naval Reactor programs.
  What the Sanchez amendment would do is to allow the Department of 
Defense to have the option of transferring funds to nonproliferation 
programs. It does not remove funding from weapons programs or Naval 
Reactor Program, but it provides DOD the flexibility to allocate 
funding to areas which they believe will effectively secure dangerous 
nuclear material and to respond to emergencies and threats as they may 
arise.
  Nuclear weapons materials remain dangerously vulnerable, so terrorist 
groups continue to seek these weapons and material every day.
  I would like to ask my colleagues from both sides of the aisle, if 
there was a loose nuclear weapon or missing fissile material or the 
risk of these materials landing in the hands of terrorists, why would 
we not want the Department of Defense to have the flexibility to engage 
nuclear weapons experts from NNSA? That is exactly what my amendment 
provides.
  Once again, my amendment doesn't take any funding away from weapons 
nor from Naval Reactors, but it simply removes the barriers and 
provides the Department of Defense the flexibility to use all of its 
resources to effectively address such nuclear threats.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, this is the fourth year in a row 
this amendment or something similar to it has been offered. Once again, 
I am going to ask that this be rejected.
  The DOD has asked for the authority to transfer funds to NNSA's 
nuclear weapons activities and Naval Reactors. It has not asked to move 
limited resources to pay for NNSA nonproliferation activities.
  The Navy may need to utilize authority in FY 2015 to support Naval 
Reactors, which has taken major funding cuts in recent years, including 
23 percent in FY 2014.

[[Page 8731]]

  As Admiral Richardson, director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion Programs 
at NNSA said at our hearing on April 8:

       A 23 percent shortfall in my operations and infrastructure 
     requirements resulted in insufficient funds to do required 
     maintenance on one of my land-based prototypes, and without 
     relief, I will have no choice but to shut down that reactor, 
     resulting in 450 nuclear-trained operators not reporting to 
     the fleet, putting a greater burden on sailors and families 
     that are already sustaining 9- to 10-month deployments.

  Keeping the underlying language sends a clear message to NNSA that 
nuclear weapons activities and Naval Reactors are the NNSA's primary 
mission and that it must prioritize those missions and deliver what the 
military needs.
  Any defense funds transferred out of DOD should only be used for 
activities in line with DOD priorities, so I urge opposition to the 
gentlelady's amendment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, may I ask how much 
time I have left?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California has 1\1/2\ minutes 
remaining.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I reserve my time to 
close.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield such time as he may consume to the 
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chair, I thank the subcommittee chairman for 
yielding, and I do want to applaud my friend and colleague from 
California for her desire to fund nonproliferation.
  That is a worthy goal that we all agree with, but right now, NNSA is 
going to be spending in the bill that we are debating $1.6 billion for 
that worthy goal, and to allow the Department of Defense to go in that 
direction also would dilute the money that they need so badly for 
readiness and training, paying our men and women in uniform, providing 
them the food and weapons that they need.
  So for that reason, I, too, oppose this amendment and ask for a 
``no'' vote.
  Nuclear nonproliferation efforts simply don't need more money, and if 
you don't believe me, believe General Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff. At our March 16 hearing, he said, in response to a 
question of my colleague from California, Ms. Sanchez:

       I speak in this regard on behalf of the Joint Chiefs 
     because, of course, we have discussed and debated this among 
     ourselves, and I think we have allocated an appropriate and 
     adequate amount of money into nonproliferation in our budget.

  So simply put, our senior military officials agree that the 
nonproliferation budget is already sufficient, and therefore, this 
amendment is unnecessary.
  This is the fourth year in a row we have debated it, and I would just 
ask that we stop the debate on this amendment and vote ``no.''
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I would like to 
correct my colleague. It was not the fourth year in a row we have 
debated it. For example, we didn't debate this last year.
  I would further like to say that one of the reasons we have asked for 
Naval Reactor moneys is because of the shortfall that they had this 
past year that they weren't able to react to because they didn't have 
the flexibility.
  So with all of these issues going on with terrorists, in particular 
looking for nuclear arms or material, I think that it is important for 
us to give the Department of Defense that flexibility.
  The same type of thing that they found themselves in a bind for with 
the reactors this past year, it would be important not to find 
ourselves in a bind if we would need it for this year.

                              {time}  2100

  And I would also like to remind my colleagues that yes, we put some 
more money into nonproliferation this year after many years of cutting 
it, but we put a significantly more amount of money into the nuclear 
armament piece.
  Mr. Chairman, I would just ask my colleagues to vote for the 
flexibility for the Department of Defense. I have no further speakers, 
and I urge my colleagues to support my amendment with the underlying 
bill.
  Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chair, I respect my friend from 
California. She is very knowledgeable on the subject, but she is wrong 
on this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote.
  Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez).
  The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded 
vote.
  The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on 
the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be 
postponed.


                 Amendment No. 4 Offered by Mr. Lamborn

  The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 4 printed in 
House Report 113-455.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       In section 1215, redesignate subsections (d) and (e) as 
     subsections (e) and (f), respectively.
       In section 1215, insert after subsection (c) the following:
       (d) Process for Reimbursement.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall request 
     submission of claims for reimbursement, including full 
     documentation, from each grantee, contractor, or 
     subcontractor that paid to the Government of Afghanistan 
     taxes assessed on Department of Defense assistance during 
     fiscal year 2014 for an amount equal to the amount the 
     grantee, contractor, or subcontractor paid to the Government 
     of Afghanistan in such taxes.
       (2) Plan for reimbursement.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     seek to establish a plan in conjunction with the Government 
     of Afghanistan to address claims for reimbursement described 
     in paragraph (1) and to provide for reimbursement by the 
     Government of Afghanistan of such claims. The Secretary shall 
     submit any such plan established under this paragraph to the 
     congressional defense committees in a timely manner.
       (3) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary of Defense does not 
     submit the plan described in paragraph (2) to the 
     congressional defense committees by not later than March 1, 
     2015, any funds withheld from the Government of Afghanistan 
     pursuant to subsection (a) shall be used to reimburse each 
     grantee, contractor, or subcontractor that submits a claim 
     for reimbursement under paragraph (1) by the amount specified 
     in such claim and verified by the Secretary.

  The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from 
Colorado (Mr. Lamborn) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, when our soldiers, sailors, airmen, 
marines, and Defense civilians deploy overseas, the Department of 
Defense enters into agreements with the host nation to prohibit the 
taxation of the assistance provided by U.S. companies to support their 
missions.
  We have entered into such agreements with Afghanistan, but in the 
last 6 years, the Afghan Government has chosen to ignore these 
agreements. It has levied more than $1 billion in illegal taxes against 
our U.S. businesses which are supporting our warfighters.
  Last year we took action to withhold assistance funding in response 
to this illegal taxation, yet the Afghan Government continues to submit 
tax bills to our companies. If the firms refuse to pay, Afghan 
officials threaten to deny them permits and visas, to arrest company 
workers, and to prohibit them from moving mission essential equipment 
into and throughout the country. Though our committee has now increased 
the amount of funding to be withheld, I propose this amendment to 
hopefully end this wrong practice altogether.
  This amendment would require two important steps forward: first the 
Secretary of Defense would take a full account of illegal taxes levied 
by the Afghan Government against American companies; second, the 
Secretary will establish a plan for the Afghan Government to reimburse 
the illegally levied taxes.

[[Page 8732]]

  In short, no U.S. company should be threatened or financially 
punished for supporting our troops and Department of Defense civilians 
in Afghanistan. This amendment strikes at the root of the problem, and 
I urge its adoption.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chair, I am very sympathetic to the 
problem. This is certainly something that the Afghan Government should 
not be doing. As I understand the amendment, however, this would 
require the U.S. Government to reimburse those private companies and 
then seek reimbursement from the Afghan Government.
  At the end of the day, that is the problem and concern that we have 
on our side is that if we want to take all the deliberate steps that we 
can to try and require the Afghans to repay this money, that is great--
I can see the little gathering of staff over there that disagrees with 
me, so maybe we will have to work on this. But as I understand it, if 
that reimbursement cannot be achieved from the Afghan Government, this 
would require the U.S. Government, the U.S. taxpayers to reimburse 
these companies. For that reason, I would be opposed unless someone can 
convince me otherwise.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, in response, and I appreciate the 
gentleman's comments, the bookkeeping trouble that this would involve 
is first put on the Afghan Government in an attempt to save the trouble 
to our own Department of Defense folks.
  On your second point, I don't believe U.S. taxpayer dollars would be 
at risk because this would only be money withheld that would otherwise 
go to the Afghan Government and is committed for that purpose is my 
understanding.
  So you raise good questions, but I think both of those objections are 
satisfied by this amendment.
  At this point, Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield as much time as he 
may consume to the gentleman from California, Representative McKeon, 
the chairman of the full committee.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank the gentleman for his 
concern and for bringing this issue to the floor.
  We did address this in the underlying bill. DOD contractors are 
providing very important services. It supports the ISAF mission in 
Afghanistan, and they should not be illegally taxed.
  We need to address this. I think the gentleman's amendment will move 
the process forward. I think we have time between now and the Senate 
passage and conference to resolve the issue. Also, hopefully there will 
be a new President in Afghanistan that will have a whole different way 
of addressing the situation. So what I would ask is that we do continue 
to work together on this as we move the process forward through 
conference.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, how much time is left on our side of the 
issue?
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado has 2 minutes remaining.
  Mr. LAMBORN. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chair, I yield myself the balance of my 
time.
  The problems are there in the drafting of this amendment. Yes, first 
it does ask for the Afghan Government to step up and find money and do 
this; but if they don't, it does put DOD in the position of reimbursing 
them. You can say that would just come from money that they would give 
to Afghanistan anyway, but that money they are giving to Afghanistan, I 
am not sure if that is true, first of all. Second of all, whatever 
money we are giving Afghanistan, we are giving it to them for a reason. 
So I think there is a problem here.
  There is also the problem of do we have a list of these contractors 
who have been illegally taxed versus legally taxed? How do we sort 
through all of that?
  I am not going to belabor the point. I am going to oppose the 
amendment. I know how this works. I am going to lose. We will work it 
out in conference. I do have serious concerns about this amendment and 
the way it is written and urge a ``no'' vote.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, to summarize, these are legitimate 
questions that the ranking member has raised. I appreciate his 
comments, and there are valid issues in that it is not a clean or 
perfect situation. But the trouble is a billion dollars is a lot of 
money to our defense contractors, and to not try to address it would do 
a really big disservice to them. So I think it is worth tackling the 
difficulty that might be entailed in getting the paperwork done 
properly because the goal is worth doing. A billion dollars is a lot of 
money. Some of these companies might be big contractors; some of them 
might be small contractors.
  So I would urge the adoption of this amendment, and Mr. Chairman, I 
yield back the balance of my time.
  The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman 
from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
  The amendment was agreed to.


                Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Garamendi

  The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 5 printed in 
House Report 113-455.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the appropriate place in subtitle E of title XII of 
     division A, insert the following:

     SEC. _. MATTERS RELATING TO COMBATING WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING.

       (a) Additional Requirements Under Executive Order 13648.--
       (1) In general.--If the President continues to implement 
     Executive Order 13648 (78 Fed. Reg. 40619; relating to 
     combating wildlife trafficking), or any related or successor 
     executive order, on or after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the President shall take the actions described in 
     paragraphs (2) and (3) with respect to such Executive Order.
       (2) Co-chairs of task force.--The President shall direct 
     the addition of the Secretary of Defense as a Co-Chair of the 
     Task Force.
       (3) Functions.--The President shall direct the Task Force 
     to perform the following functions:
       (A) Address the important role the military can play in 
     fulfilling the goals of the Strategy and address the national 
     security concerns presented by wildlife trafficking networks.
       (B) Coordinate with the Department of Defense to evaluate 
     the effectiveness and distribution of funds to foreign 
     countries for wildlife trafficking assistance.
       (C) Update the 2012 strategy of the Department of State and 
     the United States Agency for International Development to 
     integrate information systems from the Department of Defense 
     and other relevant Federal agencies that can provide further 
     expertise on transnational crime networks involved in 
     wildlife trafficking.
       (D) Carry out a follow-up initiative on the National 
     Intelligence Estimate regarding wildlife trafficking security 
     threats that incorporates the Department of Defense and the 
     potential role of the military and intelligence community in 
     combating wildlife trafficking.
       (E) Combine data from the Department of Defense, the 
     Department of State, the United States Agency for 
     International Development, the Fish and Wildlife Service of 
     the Department of the Interior, and the National Marine 
     Fisheries Service of the Department of Commerce for a more 
     successful international information system relating to 
     wildlife trafficking.
       (F) Investigate technologies that the Department of Defense 
     can supply to foreign governments to combat poaching and 
     submit to the President a report on progress to achieve this 
     objective.
       (4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
       (A) Strategy.--The term ``Strategy'' means the National 
     Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking developed and 
     implemented pursuant to Executive Order 13648 (78 Fed. Reg. 
     40619; relating to combating wildlife trafficking).
       (B) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means Presidential 
     Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking established pursuant to 
     section 2 of Executive Order 13648.
       (C) Wildlife trafficking.--The term ``wildlife 
     trafficking'' has the meaning given the term in section 1 of 
     Executive Order 13648.
       (b) Incorporating Wildlife Trafficking as a United States 
     National Security Concern.--The President shall take such 
     actions as may be necessary to--
       (1) expand the Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized 
     Crime (July 2011) to cover wildlife trafficking terrorist and 
     insurgent networks and authorize the consideration of such 
     networks as a security priority;
       (2) authorize the Department of Defense to evaluate 
     wildlife trafficking as a non-traditional security issue that 
     threatens United

[[Page 8733]]

     States national security and require the Department of 
     Defense to submit to Congress a report regarding progress 
     during and the results after evaluating the threat of 
     wildlife trafficking as a non-traditional human security 
     issue;
       (3) authorize the Department of Defense to establish and 
     carry out a grant program to transfer excess defense articles 
     to allied countries that are combating wildlife trafficking;
       (4) authorize the Department of Defense to target financial 
     and asset flows of organized criminal syndicates, insurgents, 
     and terrorist networks that are involved in any aspect of 
     wildlife trafficking; and
       (5) authorize the expansion of security cooperation 
     programs to include funds for wildlife trafficking training 
     and equipment.
       (c) Additional Programs Under Training and Education.--
       (1) Regional defense combating terrorism fellowship 
     program.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the 
     Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Program includes 
     instruction on targeting the security threats of terrorist 
     groups engaged in illegal wildlife trafficking.
       (2) Partnership for integrated logistics operations and 
     tactics.--The Secretary of Defense shall expand the 
     Partnership for Integrated Logistics Operations and Tactics 
     to build long-term operational logistics between the Armed 
     Forces of the United States and the Afghan Security Forces to 
     include cooperation for operations combating wildlife 
     trafficking networks.

        Modification to Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Garamendi

  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent that my 
amendment be modified with what I have placed at the desk.
  The CHAIR. The Clerk will report the modification.
  The Clerk read as follows:
  Modification offered by Mr. Garamendi to amendment No. 5:

       On page 5, line 14 replace ``Afghan Security Forces'' with 
     ``African Union Standby Force (ASF)''

  The CHAIR. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from 
California?
  There was no objection.
  The CHAIR. The amendment is modified.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Garamendi) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, for some time, like more than an hour 
today, this House debated and discussed the issue of Boko Haram and the 
terror that they are enacting throughout Nigeria and the southern Sahel 
of Africa. This is not a new issue. This is an issue that has been 
ongoing among several violent extreme organizations operating in that 
area. We have seen this in Sudan. We have heard about the Lord's 
Resistance Army. We know this problem also of violent extreme 
organizations in the Somalia area.
  The question arises: How do these organizations finance themselves? 
Well, over the years previously it was blood diamonds and things of 
that sort. In recent years, it has now become an issue of killing 
elephants and selling their tusks.
  This amendment deals with the violent extreme organizations and 
attempts to deal with the way in which they have been able to finance 
themselves, that is, illegally poaching animals, particularly elephants 
in Africa.
  If we are going to deal with this, we are going to have to use some 
of the assets that are available through the American military. AFRICOM 
has shown that they can provide ISR assets. This happened in Mali with 
the violent extreme organization that eventually was dealt with in 
Mali. AFRICOM provided the use of the ISR Global Hawk to identify and 
to support the French troops.
  What this amendment would do would be to authorize the military, the 
Department of Defense, to work with African countries to provide 
support as they attempt to deal with these violent extreme 
organizations that are illegally poaching animals and using that 
revenue from that poaching, particularly the sale of ivory, to support 
themselves.
  The amendment also provides for the opportunity for the African Union 
forces to receive assistance from the American military in how to 
position themselves to have the correct military units in place, how to 
use various intelligence sources that are available. It also provides 
for the Department of Defense to become part of the organization that 
we now have in place to deal with illegal poaching throughout Africa. 
That is basically what it is.
  Had this been in place for the last couple of years, would Boko Haram 
have been successful? Well, they would be less successful. They would 
have less opportunity to poach the very valuable elephants and their 
tusks.
  So I ask for support of this amendment, and I reserve the balance of 
my time.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chair, I yield myself 2 minutes.
  Mr. Chairman, this issue has been a longstanding concern of the 
gentleman from California as well as other Members. There is certainly 
evidence that terrorists and criminal organizations use a variety of 
illegal methods to fund their organizations. That includes wildlife 
trafficking. It includes human trafficking. It includes drug 
trafficking. It includes kidnapping for ransom. A whole variety of 
illegal methods are used to fund these organizations.
  Now, in last year's NDAA, we expanded the authority of the military 
to deal with Ministries of Interior so that in fighting terrorism they 
can have more options available to them. It is also those Ministries of 
Interior that deal with these wildlife trafficking issues.
  Last year's bill also added 15 countries in Africa to the list of 
those countries with which DOD can partner on transnational criminal 
organizations involving drugs.

                              {time}  2115

  For Boko Haram they already designated a terrorist organization. For 
them or for drugs those authorities already exist.
  The question is: Do we want to make it a priority of the military to 
focus on this illegal poaching as a priority in itself? My concern is 
that the military is already stretched thin. If it is terrorism, fine. 
If it is these transnational organizations, fine. But to give the 
military poaching as a priority would be a mistake.
  The other point I would make is that the President's budget for the 
State Department cut funding for this very purpose this year. Last 
year, they spent about $54 billion. This year the President asked for 
less than $30 million.
  So my suggestion to the Member is that perhaps he could focus on the 
President's budget request for the State Department, the Department of 
the Interior, law enforcement agencies, all of which are engaged in 
this, and that would be a better use of resources.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from Texas makes a very 
useful and interesting argument, but neglects to focus on one of the 
principal ways in which these organizations do support themselves, and 
that is with illegal poaching, particularly of elephants, and the use 
of their tusks to support themselves. It is about an $8 billion 
business.
  This does not in any way deter the current power that the Department 
of Defense has, but rather, it allows them to engage with those 
organizations in these governments that deal specifically with the 
conservation of the species in those countries. It does not prioritize. 
It simply gives an additional role and augments the military's use of 
their equipment, particularly the ISR equipment, to focus specifically, 
but not only, on the poaching issue.
  It is very clear from studies that have been done by conservation 
organizations throughout the Sahel of Africa and in other parts of 
Africa, that this is a significant source of revenue for these violent 
extreme organizations. We ought not ignore that.
  I would ask for a positive vote on this matter in that it does not 
deter in any way from what the gentleman from Texas says the military 
is already doing, but adds to it.
  With that, I yield back the balance of my time.

[[Page 8734]]


  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlelady 
from Indiana (Mrs. Walorski), a valuable member of the Armed Services 
Committee.
  Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from Texas.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise to oppose the amendment. While I appreciate the 
good intention of the gentleman from California, I believe we have 
immense security challenges in Africa and limited defense resources.
  Defense has been cut over $1 trillion in recent years, the military 
is facing shortfalls in readiness, and terrorism threats across Africa 
are evolving and expanding.
  Given that the military cannot meet our current requirements in 
Africa, I don't think it is wise to add new requirements at this time. 
Military commanders in Africa have testified about shortfalls in 
intelligence, crisis response forces, and enablers to meet the ``new 
normal'' security requirements in Africa.
  No military commander has highlighted wildlife trafficking as a key 
issue in their area of responsibility, nor have they recommended it be 
prioritized before this committee.
  Combating wildlife trafficking should not be a core DOD mission. DOD 
and the administration recognize that combating wildlife trafficking is 
not a core DOD function, and thus the national strategy for combating 
wildlife trafficking does not set forth any DOD requirements.
  In an era of declining budgets, the DOD should not be duplicating 
efforts that are already occurring within the interagency, including 
the intelligence community, the law enforcement community, and the 
State Department, all of which are already working on and collecting 
information on this issue.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, the bottom line is if there is a 
terrorism connection to this illegal poaching, the military has full 
authority to go after it and try to stop it, just like other forms of 
terrorist financing. But as an independent objective for the military, 
we are stretched too thin already, and for that reason I recommend that 
the Members reject this amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment, as modified, offered by 
the gentleman from California (Mr. Garamendi).
  The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on 
the amendment, as modified, offered by the gentleman from California 
will be postponed.


                 Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Daines

  The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 6 printed in 
House Report 113-455.
  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 515, strike lines 19 and 20.

  The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from 
Montana (Mr. Daines) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Montana.
  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Chairman, our country's intercontinental ballistic missiles make 
the world safer. They are an integral part of the nuclear triad that 
advances the cause of peace and promotes our national security 
interests around the world.
  The Defense Department recently put forward a nuclear force structure 
plan under the New START Treaty. It is committed to maintaining 450 
nuclear launchers in at least a warm status. In doing so, the Pentagon 
recognized the strategic value of preserving our robust nuclear 
deterrent capability.
  The base bill would sunset the warm status requirement in 2021. I 
believe this is unwise and it is premature.
  First and foremost, we don't know what the future holds and whether 
it will be in our strategic and security interests to shut down some of 
our silos 7 years from now.
  On the other hand, what we do know is that maintaining our nuclear 
launchers provides our commanders with maximum flexibility to respond 
to potential nuclear threats against the American people and our 
allies. And we know that preserving this capability complicates our 
adversaries' ability to target our nuclear assets.
  Further, we know that maintaining our current silos is in the best 
interest of taxpayers because rebuilding them would be very expensive.
  In short, there is simply no justification for deciding today how 
many silos will be needed to safeguard our security interests in 2021.
  I urge House passage of my amendment to strike the ill-advised sunset 
provision in the underlying.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, this amendment violates a bipartisan 
agreement that was reached in the House Armed Services Committee.
  I wish that the gentleman would focus on the fact that micromanaging 
our Nation's nuclear defenses is really not in the best interest of our 
country. I also urge the gentleman to realize that this is a highly 
technical issue. We have some 450 Minuteman-III missile silos. This 
would change the status of about 50 of those 450.
  These are probably the least survivable of all our nuclear weapons. 
They have been targeted by the Russians and probably others for 
decades. It is very important that we have an appropriate and flexible 
and survivable nuclear deterrent. As I mentioned, these land-based 
missiles are probably the least survivable.
  It is also important to recognize that, as I understand the way the 
amendment is drafted, this could even prevent testing and routine 
maintenance of these silos. I know that is not the gentleman's intent, 
but we need to make sure that we are not overreaching here and 
hamstringing our military and their nuclear defenses.
  It is no secret that the sponsors of this amendment happen to be from 
the States of North Carolina, Montana, and Wyoming, and also a 
gentleman from Colorado. That leads one to think that this might 
perhaps be a parochial amendment more than a nuclear defense amendment. 
I hope that is not the case, but it does lead one to think in that 
direction.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, while the President is the Commander in 
Chief--this is the issue of micromanaging--the Constitution gives 
Congress the power to raise and support armies and to provide and 
maintain a Navy. It is our duty and responsibility to help shape our 
Nation's defense policy.
  Regarding the ICBMs, they are deployed in hardened silos. That would 
tend to force an opponent to exhaust his own nuclear forces to disarm 
U.S. ICBMs, leaving the opponent vulnerable to a U.S. retaliatory 
strike. Without ICBMs, as few as five nuclear warheads could 
successfully disarm the U.S.
  Now I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Dakota, Kevin 
Cramer, my friend.
  Mr. CRAMER. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  With regard to the claims of parochialism, there is no question that 
those of us from the States that host these ICBMs are technical experts 
in the field. It only makes sense that we would know a lot about it.
  Mr. Chairman, while I am content with the Department of Defense's 
recent force structure announcement on complying with the New START 
Treaty to maintain 454 ICBM silos in warm status, I too strongly oppose 
the hard stop date that maintains these missile silos in warm status no 
later than 2021. Members of this body, Members of the Senate, the 
Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 
many others have said the

[[Page 8735]]

sustainment of our nuclear triad is essential and that any further 
reductions ought not be done in unilateral fashion.
  Maintaining and investing in the modernization of this weapon system 
is just as important as any other leg of the nuclear triad. From what I 
can tell and from what the people of North Dakota know, it is a lot 
cheaper to maintain them than to rebuild them should we err in our 
judgment currently.
  I urge passage of the amendment.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Washington (Mr. Smith), the distinguished ranking member of the 
committee.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose this 
amendment. It really doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
  What the bill does is it says you can't touch these things since 
until 2021. Now, we don't like that in the first place because this is 
micromanaging, again, DOD's ability to make decisions about how best to 
make sure that we maintain our nuclear deterrence. This is a fine 
example of why DOD is going to be in so much trouble down the road. Any 
effort they make to save money is going to be blocked by parochial 
interest. The people who are from there will rise up and say: No, you 
can't do that, basically because it negatively impacts my constituents.
  The thing that is truly awful about this one is it doesn't negatively 
impact constituents. It says 2021 sunset. And it is not a hard stop 
date, regrettably. It is 2021 when it sunsets, and any Congress that 
wants to extend it between now and, I guess that is 7 years from now, 
can go ahead and extend it.
  DOD should not be forced into a position of saying if a silo exists 
it has to be maintained forever, which is basically what this amendment 
says. It says it is completely impossible that under any set of 
circumstances might it be in the best interest of the Department of 
Defense and the national security of this Nation to get rid of even one 
silo. That doesn't make any sense.
  The underlying bill more than protects the parochial interests of the 
sponsors here by making sure that DOD can't touch it until 2021. But 
that is not enough. They have got to offer an amendment to strip it out 
so that it goes on forever. That simply doesn't make any sense. This 
is, again, micromanaging for parochial interests. It is just like when 
DOD wants to move five C-130s from somewhere. The people from there 
rise up and say we have to stop them. No, we don't. We have to let DOD 
make intelligent decisions to spend money wisely to best protect 
national security. At a minimum, we ought to be able to have a sunset 7 
years from now without having to remove even that tiny little 
possibility that a sensible decision might be allowed to be made by the 
Department of Defense.
  I urge opposition of the amendment.
  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I continue to reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. COOPER. May I inquire as to how much time I have remaining, Mr. 
Chairman.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Garamendi).
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, I took up an amendment a moment ago and 
people were talking about how we use our resources to keep these 
missile silos open when they are not needed and questioning whether 
missiles are needed. We are talking about billions and billions of 
dollars. So if we are really, really concerned about how we deploy our 
precious money, then we ought not be doing this amendment.

                              {time}  2130

  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I continue to reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to oppose this 
amendment.
  As I mentioned, it is poorly drafted, and it probably prevents even 
the routine testing and maintenance of the silos, which could not 
possibly be an intention of the authors. It also micromanages the 
Defense Department.
  For them to renege on the deal that was made in committee--the 
bipartisan deal--in order to give you 7 more years of leeway is really 
a pretty remarkable thing. This sets a new level for parochialism and 
greed, unfortunately, in this body. I hope the Members will reject this 
amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I am prepared to close.
  Again, I urge support for my amendment, which is to protect our 
country's nuclear deterrent capability by striking this unwise and 
premature sunset language in the underlying bill.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman 
from Montana (Mr. Daines).
  The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on 
the amendment offered by the gentleman from Montana will be postponed.


                 Amendment No. 7 Offered by Mr. Lamborn

  The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 7 printed in 
House Report 113-455.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle B of title XXVIII, add the following 
     new section:

     SEC. 28__. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC 
                   LANDS.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) national defense should be the top priority for all 
     aspects of the Federal Government; and
       (2) national security functions, such as military training 
     and exercises, should be the top priority, particularly with 
     regard to the use of land owned by the United States.

  The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from 
Colorado (Mr. Lamborn) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, most Americans do not realize that 28 
percent of the land across our great country is owned by the Federal 
Government. In the 11 most western States, the Federal Government owns 
a staggering 47 percent of all land.
  In my State of Colorado, the Federal Government owns 36 percent of 
the land. Over one-third of all land in Colorado is owned and operated 
here, out of Washington, D.C.
  The management of these lands is often controversial, particularly 
when the Federal Government owns such a significant portion of the land 
of a State or of a locality. There are often situations where there are 
competing and conflicting uses of this publicly-owned land.
  This Federal ownership of public land is administered through a 
variety of Federal agencies and bureaus, making things potentially even 
more difficult for States and localities.
  This public land serves many functions, including, in some cases, as 
a prime training ground for the U.S. military. In Colorado, for 
example, the new Combat Aviation Brigade at Fort Carson flies their 
helicopters up into the mountains around Colorado Springs for training.
  To practice high altitude landings in rugged terrain, which is a 
crucial skill for combat in countries like Afghanistan, the Army must 
get permission from the various parts of the Federal Government that 
own the land.
  Over the last few years, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land 
Management and other agencies have reduced the number of landing sites 
that are permissible. In the latest permit, they told the Army that 
Congress has not made national security a priority for public lands.
  Unfortunately, this is not just isolated to Colorado. Across the 
country, military bases are continually fighting with other government 
agencies to maintain their access to public lands.
  Today, my amendment will help set the record straight. National 
security should be the top priority for our government, and that most 
certainly includes the ownership of public land--land owned and 
operated by the Federal Government. We should apply the rule of common 
sense.

[[Page 8736]]

  Unless there is an obvious reason not to, public land should, of 
course, be available so that men and women in uniform can receive 
realistic, effective training that will save lives in combat. As we 
stand here tonight, we must remember that the first job of the Federal 
Government is to protect our Nation.
  I urge support for my amendment, resolving that national security 
should be a top priority for public lands.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in 
opposition.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, there are a lot of competing 
interests for public lands. Certainly, national security is one of 
them, but it is not the only one. There is domestic aviation, and there 
are all kinds of considerations.
  This is not terribly binding, as it is a sense of Congress, and so it 
does not change the law. I do, however, think it sets a bad precedent 
that, somehow, the Department of Defense is going to hold sway over 
public lands over all of their interests, regardless of what they are.
  We have had many, many interests in our public lands. Certainly, 
defense is one of them. I don't think it should be paramount. 
Therefore, I oppose the amendment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I just don't want it to happen again that 
the Forest Service or any other bureaucracy can tell the men and women 
who are training to protect our country that they can't train and that 
Congress has never even addressed this situation.
  I at least want to have a resolution on record expressing the sense 
of Congress that national defense is a priority. That is the way our 
Constitution is written. I think this makes all kinds of sense, and I 
would urge its adoption.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I 
may consume.
  It sort of depends on why the Forest Service wants to limit that use. 
If there are other legitimate interests in the area and if the Forest 
Service doesn't want them test-firing whatever it is they are test-
firing, I think we need to have a balance between those interests.
  It is conceivable that the Forest Service might have something they 
are trying to protect that the DOD has not thought about, and I think a 
balance of those interests is better than making one agency paramount 
over others.
  The Forest Service does not know much about the Department of 
Defense, but I would submit that the Department of Defense doesn't know 
much about what the Forest Service is trying to protect. It is a matter 
of both sides doing their jobs and striking the proper balance, so I 
would simply urge a ``no'' vote.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire as to how much time is 
remaining?
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado has 2 minutes remaining.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, in conclusion, I would just say that there 
are balancing interests and that there are competing interests that 
should be, many times, debated and weighed. That is, actually, what the 
Army at Fort Carson does.
  They have entered into the permitting agreements with the Forest 
Service and with the Bureau of Land Management, agreeing with the 
concerns raised by those two bureaucracies, so they have worked 
together in a cooperative fashion.
  What I am addressing, though, is when the Forest Service comes out 
and says that Congress has never addressed this issue. I think that 
that is wrong. Now is the time to set the record straight, and this 
amendment does set the record straight.
  We are expressing that national security is a priority. That is what 
the Constitution says, and that is what we are stating right here. I 
ask for an ``aye'' vote.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman 
from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
  The amendment was agreed to.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee do now rise.
  The motion was agreed to.
  Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. 
Daines) having assumed the chair, Mr. Stewart, Chair of the Committee 
of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported that that 
Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 4435) to 
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for military activities 
of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to 
prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for 
other purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.

                          ____________________