[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 160 (2014), Part 4]
[Senate]
[Pages 5010-5011]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           MIDTERM ELECTIONS

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, yesterday the Democrats in the Senate held 
a news conference in which they rolled out their agenda, which has been 
described differently by different news organizations. The headline 
from the Washington Examiner said: ``Majority threatened, Democrats 
take up populace agenda to distract from ObamaCare.'' The Wall Street 
Journal headline said: ``Senate Democrats try to change subject from 
ObamaCare.'' The New York Times in reporting on that story, their 
headline was: ``Democrats, as Part of Midterm Strategy to Schedule 
Votes on Pocketbook Issues.'' So that was a little more, perhaps, 
flattering headline.
  In the story in the New York Times, it goes on to say:

       The proposals have little chance of passing. But Democrats 
     concede that making new laws is not really the point. Rather, 
     they are trying to force Republicans to vote against them.

  Later on in the story, the New York Times goes on to say:

       Part of the goal is to energize the Democratic base, which 
     will be crucial to turnout in the more conservative states 
     where the party needs to win this year.

  So everybody kind of gets the joke that this is really about the 
midterm elections. The agenda the Democrats are now rolling out is 
designed to try to create a distraction away from their economic record 
and from ObamaCare.
  It is interesting to me because the Democrats have been the majority 
in the Senate now for 8 years. So you would think by now this sort of 
an agenda would have been inactive. In fact, for a few years they had a 
filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. They had 60 votes and could do 
literally anything they wanted. Most of these items now are being 
rolled out because it is, as I said, an election year, and they are 
saying: These are things that we can do for the American people.
  Well, I think the American people are saying enough already. You have 
done enough to us. Please don't do any more.
  The agenda is being described as a fair shot for everyone. Well, I 
think the American people, perhaps, don't see it as a shot for them as 
they do a shot at them.
  If you look at the last several years as any indication of that, it 
hasn't worked very well. The agenda that has been advanced by the 
Democrats here in the Senate and by the President of the United States 
has left us with a sluggish economy, chronic high unemployment, massive 
amounts of debt, the lowest labor participation rate, literally, that 
we have seen in 35 years. In fact, last year the economy grew at 0.9 
percent. So you have this sluggish economy sputtering along, and the 
American people are asking: Where are the jobs? Where is the take-home 
pay?
  Since the President took office, household income in this country has 
gone down--not up--by $3,700 per family. If you look at all the 
policies put in place by the Democratic majority, there isn't really 
anything that you could point to that helps create jobs mainly because 
it is heavy handed, top-down management from Washington, DC.
  The American people need policies that will unleash the American free 
enterprise system and unleash the entrepreneurs and small businesses 
that would allow them to grow this economy and expand this economy. 
That is better for everyone. Every middle-class American in this 
country wants a better quality of life, a better standard of life for 
their children and grandchildren than what they have experienced. This 
may be the first generation of Americans where this is not true. Why? 
Because policies in Washington, DC, make it more difficult, more 
expensive, to create jobs.
  You can go down the list. If you look at ObamaCare, according to the 
Congressional Budget Office, ObamaCare is going to result in 2.5 
million fewer full-time workers. According to the CBO, there will be 
2.5 million fewer full-time workers over the next decade and $1 
trillion in lower wages. Fewer jobs and lower take-home pay is what we 
are seeing as a result of the policies that have been put in place by 
the Democratic majority in the Senate and by the President of the 
United States.
  Yesterday there was another announcement about yet another delay of 
ObamaCare--which will be, I think, the 30th delay that we have seen so 
far with regard to that legislation. In speaking about that delay, the 
majority leader of the Senate said yesterday that he thought the delay 
was necessary because people weren't educated enough about how to use 
the Internet. Only in Washington, DC--only in Washington, DC--do you 
see politicians blaming the American people for their failures because 
that is essentially what the ObamaCare legislation is. By and large I 
think most people would conclude it just isn't working. It didn't add 
up in the first place, and it is not working.
  It is creating fewer jobs, higher premiums, higher deductibles, lower 
take-home pay for the American people, fewer choices for doctors and 
hospitals, and the idea that it is the fault of the American people 
because they are not educated enough to use the Internet--my dad is 94 
years old. He lives in my hometown of Myrtle, SD, a town of about 500 
people. He uses the Internet every single day.
  I don't think the problem is the Internet or that people in this 
country aren't educated enough to use the Internet. I think it has a 
lot more to do with the fact that incompetence here in Washington, DC, 
led to a failed rollout that confused millions of Americans. That is 
not the responsibility of, nor should we blame, the American people for 
that. That is government trying to do big things and not doing them 
well. The government doesn't do complicated things very well.
  So when you hear of the new agenda coming out from the Democratic 
majority in the Senate, that we are going to do this for the American 
people; we are going to do that for the American people and talk about 
a minimum wage increase--again, you have a Congressional Budget Office 
saying that raising the minimum wage by 40 percent, which is what is 
being proposed, would, in fact, cost the economy up to a million jobs 
and also would raise prices.
  It is going to raise prices on the people that will be hurt the most 
by price increases--lower-income Americans. Instead of putting policies 
in place that cost the American economy jobs, we ought to be looking at 
things that actually create jobs.
  We have a proposal called the Keystone Pipeline which the President's 
own State Department has said would create 42,000 jobs. So those are 
real jobs, shovel-ready jobs that would be available today. Instead we 
want to put policies in place that are actually going to cost the 
economy jobs. If you're an American citizen out there and you hear 
Washington, DC, is going to do more for you, yet again, you have got to 
be saying: Whoa, you know, hold the phone. We have seen enough of that 
already. We have seen this picture before, and we have seen what 
results when the government tries to do big and complicated things. It 
just doesn't work very well.
  The Web site rollout is a perfect example of that, as is the 2,700-
page ObamaCare legislation followed by about 25,000 pages of 
regulations, which people in this country have to try and discern and 
figure out.
  I would submit that there are things that will create jobs. We know 
the Keystone Pipeline will create jobs. Passing trade promotion 
authority and allowing our trade negotiators to create more market 
opportunities for small businesses and farmers and ranchers and 
entrepreneurs in this country and around the world will create jobs. 
Passing trade promotion authority and getting the Trans-Pacific 
Partnership and the European trade agreement enacted they say will 
expose American businesses to 1 billion new consumers worldwide. Those 
are the types of things that do create jobs, and we know that.

[[Page 5011]]

  Instead of having an election year agenda that is transparently 
stated to be that, why don't we actually talk about things that will 
create jobs and will improve the overall standard of living for people 
in this country?
  I would make one other observation, and that is another thing coming 
out of the administration right now, which will be incredibly harmful 
to the economy and make it very difficult for lower income and middle-
class Americans to make ends meet, are policies coming out of the EPA 
that are going to drive the cost of energy. Energy is an important 
input. It is a huge factor in places such as South Dakota where we have 
a cold-weather climate and an agricultural-based economy. We travel 
long distances to get places. When you talk about raising the cost of 
energy in a State such as South Dakota, you are significantly 
increasing the cost of doing business in a way that will make it more 
difficult and more expensive to create the jobs we need, get people 
back to work, and get the economy growing at a faster rate. These 
things are harmful to job growth.
  I talked to a bunch of small businesses in my State last week and 
asked them about some of these policies. I asked them: What are the 
biggest obstacles right now to your success and what are things that 
could be done that would actually be helpful?
  Of course, ObamaCare is something that immediately comes up, but also 
the whole issue of the minimum wage. The smallest business owner I 
talked to I believe had 30 employees and the largest had maybe a little 
over 200 employees. They said, look, this is a job killer. What that 
means is we are not going to be able to hire as many people. It adds 
significant higher operating costs every year to our businesses and 
makes it more difficult to create the jobs for the people who actually 
need those jobs, most of whom, in a lot of these places, are going to 
be young people who are trying to get that first job and make their way 
up the economic ladder.
  There are lots of things we could talk about that do address the 
problem rather than just addressing the symptoms, and we want to vote 
on an extension. We are going to vote on an extension of unemployment 
insurance, which will be the thirteenth time we have done that. When 
you go through an economic downturn, obviously there is a need to help 
people who have lost jobs and been displaced in the economy. But when 
are we going to start focusing on the problem rather than the symptom?
  The problem is we have almost 4 million Americans who have been 
unemployed for more than 6 months. We ought to be looking at what we 
can do to create jobs for the people who don't have jobs in our 
economy. I have introduced an amendment to the unemployment insurance 
legislation, which I don't think is going to get voted on, that has 
some simple solutions.
  One of those things is to waive the employer mandate for any employer 
who hires somebody who has been unemployed for more than 6 months. So 
if you are a long-term unemployed person and an employer hires that 
person, you get a waiver from the employer mandate which could save an 
employer several thousand dollars a year. It also calls for a 6-month 
payroll tax holiday for employers, which if you have a $40,000-a-year 
employee on your payroll, you would save about $2,400. You could save 
$4,000, $5,000, or $6,000 a year in the cost of hiring someone with 
those two suggestions. Another suggestion is to allow people to have 
access to low-interest loans--up to $10,000--to relocate to places 
where there is lower unemployment.
  My State of South Dakota is looking for workers. When I travel 
through my communities, we can't find workers. One of the biggest 
obstacles for people to get to jobs is to relocate. If we gave them a 
low-interest loan that would allow them to move to places where there 
is low unemployment and where there are jobs, it would make a lot of 
sense.
  Finally, it adopts the SKILLS Act that has passed the House of 
Representatives, which consolidates 35 Federal programs into 9 programs 
so you don't have all of this duplication and overlap in all of these 
Federal programs for worker training and shifts that resource out to 
the States where States can design programs that actually prepare and 
equip the people in their States for the jobs that are available.
  Those are the types of solutions we ought to be talking about rather 
than top-down, heavyhanded, government-driven solutions that make it 
more difficult to create jobs and is equivalent to throwing a big wet 
blanket on the American economy at the time we can least afford it.
  My State of South Dakota is a good example. We have balanced our 
budget every year since 1889. We have zero personal income tax, zero 
corporate income tax, and we have a very well-trained, hard-working, 
educated workforce. We have a good climate for doing business with a 
light regulatory touch. We have a low unemployment rate and a vibrant 
economy mainly because we understand that it isn't the government that 
creates jobs.
  When the Senate Democrats and the President come out with the 
election-year, poll-tested agenda, which is clearly driven simply to 
try to generate votes in the midterm elections rather than actually 
solve the problems--and it says that in the stories. The stories are 
very transparent about what they are trying to do. We ought to be 
focused on things that actually create jobs, such as passing the 
Keystone Pipeline, passing trade promotion authority, and looking at 
real solutions that do more than just treat symptoms, and actually get 
at the problems.
  The problem is we have too many people in this economy who have been 
unemployed for a long period of time. We need to get them back to work 
and get the economy growing faster than 1.9 percent a year. If we get 
growth back up to 3 or 4 percent a year, it will dramatically change 
the future for middle-class families in this country, and that is what 
we ought to be focused on.
  I yield the floor.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Washington.
  Mrs. MURRAY. I thank the Chair.
  (The remarks of Mrs. MURRAY pertaining to the introduction of S. 2164 
are printed in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced Bills 
and Joint Resolutions.'')
  Mrs. MURRAY. Thank you, Mr. President.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________