[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 160 (2014), Part 11]
[Senate]
[Pages 16076-16077]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                      PRESIDENT'S HEALTH CARE LAW

  Mr. BARRASSO. Madam President, this past Saturday the open enrollment 
period for the Obama health care law opened in terms of the health care 
exchange. People who bought health insurance through healthcare.gov or 
through their State's exchange are finally allowed to see how much 
their insurance is going to cost next year. Things were pushed back 
beyond the election so people wouldn't be able to find out before the 
election what it was going to cost. So the Obama administration had all 
of this information for awhile, but they intentionally kept it secret 
until after election day. Now people get to see the prices, and many 
people across the country are absolutely in shock at the increased 
costs of the health care law.
  Millions of Americans are learning their health insurance is going to 
cost them a lot more. As a matter of fact, when the exchanges opened 
November 15, on the front page of the New York Times: ``Cost of 
Coverage Under Care Act Set to Increase.'' The article says:

       The Obama administration on Friday unveiled data showing 
     that many Americans

[[Page 16077]]

     with health insurance bought under the Affordable Care Act 
     could face substantial price increases next year--in some 
     cases as much as 20 percent.

  Substantial price increases, 20 percent.
  For some people it is going to be even higher than that.
  The Wall Street Journal took a look at it and they had a large story 
with a picture on Friday and the headline is: ``Consumers Still 
Confused Ahead of Insurance Sign-ups.''
  The article describes a man named Bob Sorey, who is a real estate 
salesperson in Mount Juliet, TN. He had a plan through Blue Cross Blue 
Shield, and he says his premiums are going up nearly 25 percent next 
year. He told the newspaper, ``I just can't absorb that.''
  President Obama promised the American people they would save $2,500 
per year per family under his health care law. Nancy Pelosi, the former 
Speaker of the House, went on ``Meet the Press'' at one point and said 
everyone's rates would go down--everyone, she said. What does the 
President have to say now? What will he tell those people whose rates 
have continued to go up? What does he say to this real estate broker in 
Tennessee who can't absorb a 20-percent increase?
  In Anchorage, AK, a typical plan is going to cost 28 percent more 
next year. That is for the second cheapest silver plan, what they call 
the benchmark plan.
  In Minneapolis rates are going up almost 19 percent, and that is just 
for the premiums. For many people their copays are going up and their 
deductibles are going up as well. In some parts of Georgia 70 percent 
of the plans sold on the exchange have deductibles of at least $2,500. 
Is that affordable for people? Millions of Americans will be paying 
more in premiums as well as more out of their pocket--millions of 
people such as Bob Sorey, the real estate broker in Tennessee, who, as 
he said, just can't absorb the cost.
  These skyrocketing premiums may explain why the President's health 
care law is more unpopular right now than ever before.
  According to the latest Gallup poll, only 37 percent of Americans 
approve of the law. It was supposed to get more popular. That is what 
the Democrats on this floor told people across the country and told us. 
Instead, the opposite has happened. People see how much their costs 
have increased because of the law, and many people are learning that 
having coverage under the law is not the same as having care. There is 
a difference between coverage and care.
  That is what USA Today found out. They had a front-page article last 
Friday with the headline: ``Rural Hospitals in Critical Condition.''
  So not just the cost of coverage under the care act set to increase, 
but rural hospitals are in critical condition.
  Obama critics say the law is speeding up the demise of rural 
facilities, of rural hospitals. That is the problem.
  The article talks about a small hospital in Georgia that had to close 
in the spring of last year because of all the new burdens of the health 
care law. People in that town now have to travel many miles to get to 
another hospital in another town. One of those people was Bill Jones. 
He was a peanut and cotton farmer who lived about 9 miles away from the 
old hospital. Bill suffered a heart attack 1 month after the hospital 
had to close. The ambulance had to take him to another hospital in a 
town further away. I can tell my colleagues, as a doctor who practiced 
medicine for 25 years, when someone has a heart attack, every minute 
counts. Bill Jones didn't survive his heart attack. Maybe he wouldn't 
have survived a trip to a closer hospital; we won't know that. But the 
hospital is gone now and it is gone because of the President's health 
care law. For people living in rural States such as Georgia and my own 
State of Wyoming, this is a terrifying prospect.
  The article says that since January of 2010, more than 40 rural 
hospitals have closed across the country. There is a map of the country 
of all the places where hospitals have closed. Ezekiel Emanuel, who 
worked on the health care law, says that 40 hospitals is not enough. He 
is one of the architects of course of the President's health care law. 
He says that over the next 6 years, more than 1,000 hospitals will 
close. In more than 1,000 American communities, people will be further 
away from medical care. That is precious lost time for people who have 
heart attacks or for women with high-risk pregnancies who are further 
from the help they need to deliver a healthy baby. They may have 
coverage under the President's health care law, but that is not the 
same as getting the care they need.
  We are also seeing that for people whom the law has pushed into 
Medicaid--because Medicaid, of course--the President's goal was to push 
more and more people into Medicaid--that pays less for services than 
traditional insurance companies pay. A lot of doctors and other 
providers can't afford to take new Medicaid patients.
  There was a front-page story in the Wall Street Journal last Friday 
that says as more join Medicaid, health care systems feel strained.
  As more join Medicaid--the President's goal--health systems feel the 
strain. The article says that about one-third of all primary care 
physicians aren't taking new Medicaid patients. One of them is Dr. 
Holly Abernathy. She is a family physician in Farmington, NM, and she 
says she just can't afford to take any new patients under the program. 
She says: ``I would love to see every Medicaid patient that comes 
through my door.'' She also says: ``If you give people coverage, they 
should be able to utilize it.''
  Premiums are going up, out-of-pocket costs are going up. Hospitals 
are closing. Doctors are having to turn away patients--all because of 
the President's health care law.
  ObamaCare was too long, too complicated, too expensive, and it took 
away too much from the people who like the care and the coverage they 
had before the law was passed. That is why Republicans are going to 
vote to repeal the entire health care law.
  Meanwhile, we will also vote to strip away the worst and most 
destructive parts of the law--parts such as the employer mandate, the 
arbitrary 30-hour workweek, that has been devastating to part-time 
workers across the country and others such as the unfair medical device 
tax that sends American jobs overseas and threatens lifesaving 
innovation.
  Republicans are going to keep fighting for Americans who have been 
harmed by the President's health care law. We are going to keep 
offering the real solutions that people wanted all along--access to the 
care they need from a doctor they choose at lower cost. That is what 
the American people are demanding, and that is what they deserve. It is 
what Republicans are going to give them.
  I thank the Presiding Officer, I yield the floor, and I suggest the 
absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. HATCH. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________