[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 160 (2014), Part 11]
[House]
[Pages 16053-16055]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              IMMIGRATION

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 3, 2013, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr. 
Gohmert) for 30 minutes.
  Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Speaker, we got word earlier this afternoon that 
President Obama intends to issue an oral decree followed by a written 
decree--as any good monarch would--indicating that he has decided to 
change the law regarding immigration.
  An article here from The Washington Post has a quote from Secretary 
Jeh Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security, which he says:

       ``Legislative action is always preferable,'' Johnson said, 
     ``but we have waited for Congress to act, and the Congress 
     has not acted. The President has waited.''

  That is what leaders in places like Venezuela--many places 
historically where that statement has been made, we have waited for 
parliament or the legislature or Congress to change the law. They 
didn't do as we dictated to Congress they had to do, and therefore, we 
have decided to change the law.
  This President is creating a constitutional crisis, and it happens 
when a President is allowed to continue pushing the envelope and 
pushing the envelope and exceeding the envelope, and you have an 
incorrigible opinion written--as the majority for the Supreme Court did 
on ObamaCare--that is the height of hypocrisy.
  How the Supreme Court majority could say, on page 14 and 15, that the 
mandated penalty in ObamaCare was not a tax--the Supreme Court said if 
it were a tax, of course, under the anti-injunction statute many 
decades old, we would not have jurisdiction--plaintiffs wouldn't have 
standing.
  But since clearly the penalty is just that--it is a penalty--then it 
is not a tax because, if it were a tax, we wouldn't have jurisdiction, 
plaintiffs wouldn't have standing, and we would all be out of luck, and 
we wouldn't be able to issue an opinion, but since it is not a tax, it 
is a penalty, then we will go forward and be able to issue an opinion.
  Then you get over about 40 pages, and the opinion says, since it is a 
tax after all--even though 40 pages or so ago it wasn't--now, we found 
that it is, therefore, it is constitutional.
  So we have had all three branches help create a constitutional 
crisis. The President on one hand, by continuing to overstep the 
boundaries of the Constitution as he usurps more and more power; the 
Supreme Court by issuing decisions that are nonsensical; and Congress, 
if we continue not to use the powers of the purse to stop the 
lawlessness by this administration.
  The Supreme Court has had opportunities to stop it--they have stopped 
it on many occasions--set a record for numbers of Supreme Court 
opinions ruling against an administration unanimously, so the President 
does have that part of his legacy going, but apparently, the legacy 
continues to be stretched to the bounds of absurdity.
  The Washington Post said--this was from today:

       President Obama will announce Thursday that he will use his 
     executive authority to expand temporary protections to 
     millions of undocumented immigrants, according to several 
     individuals who have been briefed on the decision. Obama will 
     travel to Las Vegas on the heels of that announcement to 
     rally support for his initiative on Friday.

  It shouldn't be a surprise. While the President slept and four 
heros--including one ambassador--in Benghazi were killed, he got up and 
headed for Las Vegas.

                              {time}  1845

  Now, he is going to announce this constitutional crisis he is 
creating by deciding to legislate and then take off for Las Vegas 
again, gambling with the jobs of Americans as he goes.
  Getting back to the article again, it says:

       Congress will receive official details on the move 
     Thursday, according to a senior Democratic Party official.
       Even before final confirmation of the President's plans, 
     outside advocates began readying events to promote the 
     administration's immigration policy.
       ``We hear there will be a primetime Thursday evening 
     announcement, to preview, and full unveiling in Vegas on 
     Friday,'' immigration advocate Dawn Le wrote in an email to 
     other activists, which was later inadvertently sent to a 
     group of reporters Wednesday morning. ``Can folks begin to 
     work and plan watch parties for Thursday and/or Friday? 
     Unclear whether Thursday night content will be what is 
     `celebratory,' but Friday will be where we need a lot of 
     energy guaranteed.''

  That is, of course, while the President is in Las Vegas, gambling 
away American jobs.
  The article goes on:

       Obama launched his push for immigration reform in January 
     2013 in Las Vegas, outlining a plan that would allow many of 
     the Nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants to earn 
     citizenship.

  Now, it is important to note the article goes on to say:

       Johnson said the administration has concluded it has ``wide 
     latitude'' to take action.

[[Page 16054]]

     ``It can't be that we are not allowed to lift a finger to fix 
     our broken immigration system,'' he said. ``And we will.''

  That is what creates the constitutional crisis, Mr. Speaker. 
Jefferson once recommended that we shouldn't bring up a bill for a vote 
until it has had a year on file for people to review. That would 
eliminate all these legislating-by-crises situations, but we have seen 
crises generated.
  We know the former Chief of Staff for the President of the United 
States once quipped that you never want to let a good emergency go to 
waste; obviously, there is a feeling that this would be the time to 
usurp congressional authority.
  Now, the sad thing is the crisis is not as bad right now as it has 
been in the past. Any time the President talked about amnesty or legal 
status, Border Patrolmen--some on the record, some in articles--have 
pointed out any time the President--or anybody in Washington, but 
especially the President--talks about amnesty or legal status, the 
numbers of people coming in illegally, the number of people dying 
trying to get in, increases.
  The number of people wishing to get lost in the masses from Central 
America and Mexico coming in from countries where radical Islamic 
activities abound are coming in, in greater numbers.
  Interestingly, the White House has shown it has the ability to foment 
a crisis unilaterally, and then by fomenting the crisis unilaterally, 
justify the crisis they created to usurp congressional authority 
granted to Congress and no one else in the Constitution.
  There is an article from my dear friend, Senator Ted Cruz. ``The 
Constitution designs a system of checks and balances for our Nation, 
and executive amnesty for illegal immigrants unilaterally decreed by 
the White House would seriously undermine the rule of law.
  ``Our Founders repeatedly warned about the dangers of unlimited power 
within the executive branch. Congress should heed those words as the 
President threatens to grant amnesty to millions of people who have 
come to our country illegally.
  ``To be clear, the dispute over executive amnesty is not between 
President Obama and Republicans in Congress; it is a dispute between 
President Obama and the American people. The Democrats suffered 
historic losses in the midterm elections largely over the prospects of 
the President's executive amnesty. President Obama was correct: his 
policies were on the ballot across the Nation in 2014. The elections 
were a referendum on amnesty, and the voters soundly rejected it. There 
was no ambiguity.
  ``Undeterred, President Obama appears to be going forward. It is 
lawless. It is unconstitutional. He is defiant and angry at the 
American people. If he acts by executive diktat, President Obama will 
not be acting as a President, he will be acting as a monarch.
  ``Thankfully, the Framers of our Constitution, wary of the dangers of 
monarchy, gave the Congress tools to rein in abuses of power. They 
believed if the President wants to change the law, he cannot act alone; 
he must work with Congress.
  ``He may not get everything he wants, but the Constitution requires 
compromise between the branches.
  ``A monarch, however, does not compromise. As Alexander Hamilton 
explains in Federalist 69, a monarch decrees, dictates, and rules 
through fiat power, which''--as Ted Cruz points out--``is what 
President Obama is attempting. When the President embraces the tactics 
of a monarch, it becomes incumbent on Congress to wield the 
constitutional power it has to stop it.''
  He goes on to make good points.
  It is important that someone speak for the tens of millions of 
American citizens who had a dream, who hoped to have work, who hoped to 
provide for their families, who hoped to have enough to pay back 
student loans, who hoped to buy their children bicycles for Christmas, 
but they are out of work. They lost work.
  Oh, I know the books have gotten cooked, and we are told that the 
unemployment rate is dramatically better, but a big reason that the 
American voters did not indicate that at the polls is they don't feel 
it, and the reason they don't feel that the employment numbers are 
better is because they personally know they are not. They are not 
better.
  In fact, this article is from September 5 from CNS News:

       A record 92,269 million Americans 16 and older did not 
     participate in the labor force in August, as the labor force 
     participation rate matched a 36-year low of 62.8 percent, 
     according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics.

  The labor force participation rate has been as low as 62.8 percent in 
6 of the last 12 months, but prior to last October had not fallen that 
low since 1978, which, hypothetically or parenthetically, was during 
the august--I say sarcastically for those on the left that don't know 
sarcasm--days of the American economy during President Carter's 
glorious years as President.
  This article goes on:

       BLS employment statistics are based on the civilian 
     noninstitutional population, which consists of all people 16 
     or older who are not in the military or an institution such 
     as a prison, mental hospital, or nursing home.
       In August, the civilian noninstitutional population was 
     248,229 million, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 
     Of that 248 million, 155,959 million, or 62.8 percent, 
     participate in the labor force, meaning they either had a job 
     or had actively sought one in the past 4 weeks.
       The 92,269 million who did not participate in the labor 
     force are those in the civilian noninstitutional population 
     who did not have a job and did not actively seek one in the 
     last 4 weeks. Because they did not seek a job, then the 
     administration did not count them as unemployed.

  Mr. Speaker, as the President intends to announce tomorrow--and party 
in Las Vegas--going into more detail about how many Americans are going 
to be displaced from their jobs by people the President is going to 
provide amnesty to, somebody needs to be speaking up for that union 
member that would love to pay union dues if he just had a job, or for 
the single moms that have approached me in tears, saying they got 
forced into part-time work because of ObamaCare and the change in the 
law that was entailed in the ObamaCare bill.
  There are people hurting across America that are American citizens 
that once had a dream. Maybe we should label the President's 
unconstitutional actions as the American citizen dream killer, instead 
of any type of DREAMer act.
  We have seen statistics that indicate that possibly less than 10 
percent of people who have come into this country illegally are 
actually working, so the President provides amnesty for millions of 
people who are illegally here.
  I hope that he will also provide an apology to the Hispanics and 
people from different places around the world that my office is trying 
to help achieve visas, achieve citizenship legally, some taking years.
  I am sure the President is not going to feel like apologizing. 
Apparently, the indication is he wants to celebrate the 
unconstitutional actions he is going to announce in Las Vegas, but 
somebody with the government needs to apologize to the American people 
that 92 million-plus Americans are not even looking for a job any more 
when they are eligible for jobs, they could have jobs, most of them 
would like to have jobs, but they have given up. They have lost their 
dreams under this administration.
  As the President announces making millions of more people who have 
come illegally eligible to take American citizens' jobs in the next 2 
days, I hope that our Congress on both sides of the aisle will do what 
is right and say, ``Wait a minute. Secure the border, Mr. President. 
That is what is exclusively within your control.''
  The Supreme Court has said States and local authorities can't secure 
the border. It is up to the administration, and the mere fact is that 
this administration has turned their back on protecting Americans from 
the illegal aliens that have come in and killed Americans, raped 
Americans. Thank God most of them don't do those things.

[[Page 16055]]



                              {time}  1900

  But for the millions of people who have been the victims of crimes by 
people who have come in illegally, those crimes would never have 
occurred if we had had an administration that secured the border so 
people who came across with criminal records in their past in the 
countries they came from would not be allowed in here, and those crimes 
they committed in America would not have been committed.
  Those that have been deported and come back in after they committed 
crimes here and commit more crimes, as I personally saw as a judge 
happen in Smith County, Texas, those wouldn't be happening if we had an 
administration that would properly secure the border.
  The Clinton administration didn't do it. The Bush administration 
didn't do it. And now, this administration has set records for how 
poorly they have prevented people from coming in illegally, the damage 
that has been done to American citizens, crushing dreams, taking 
dreams.
  I hope and pray the President will remember his oath, that this 
precursor that was released today about the damage the President wants 
to do to American citizens who are trying to find jobs, that he will 
have second thoughts and not do it.
  Mr. Speaker, I hope the American people who spoke very loudly and 
clearly when they came out to vote will let the President know, in 
person, through email, through phone calls, that American citizens 
still need jobs.
  Why don't you help the economy get going stronger so that we need 
more people to come in and have those jobs?
  Our oath is to the American people, and when you have nearly a third 
of the United States, or getting close to half of people eligible to 
work that have even completely given up on looking for jobs, the 
economy is not good. Americans are suffering.
  Now the President wants to bring in, just provide amnesty to people 
who will then be able to compete and put American citizens out of work. 
It really is heartbreaking.
  Now, if you stay aboard, say, an Air Force One and you only go to 
rallies or golf courses where everybody is doing great, wealthy, you 
only talk to high-tech industry people that are just knocking down 
billions of dollars, it is easy to start feeling like things are going 
great. But if you go to Sabine County, Texas; San Augustine, Texas; 
Shelby County, Texas; Angelina County; Nacogdoches County; Rusk County; 
Panola County; Harrison County; Gregg County; Smith County; Wood 
County; Upshur County--those are counties all within my district. And 
in some of those counties, people are really getting desperate. They 
don't need to compete with 5 million more people for jobs. They would 
just like a job themselves.
  If the Obama administration will take the foot off of the throat of 
this economy, will help us roll back and repeal ObamaCare.
  I got notice again of another hospital in my district this week, 
there in Gilmer where my nephew was born. Gilmer hospital, where my 
nephew was born, is now going to be closed. They are not going to be 
able to handle the continued cuts that ObamaCare has created. There are 
numerous reasons, but that is a death knell.
  Hospitals are closing. People are hurting. So for the 92, between 92 
and 93 million people that have given up hope, how sad, because the 
Obama administration will not secure our borders.
  I want immigrants coming in. I love the fact that we allow more legal 
immigrants in than anybody. I love that. That is wonderful. But when 
you don't have secure borders and millions come in, millions upon 
millions, then you are moving toward a day when nobody is going to want 
to come in because you didn't have a logical immigration process. They 
overwhelmed the system. They broke the system, and now that shining 
light on a hill has gone out.
  We are moving in that direction: the military becoming too small to 
adequately protect us, people around the world in hostile environments 
deciding that America can be pushed around, radical Islamists deciding 
this is the time to move, Iran figuring out that they have an 
administration that can be duped over and over again until they have 
the atomic weapons and the ability to carry them, which they have 
already got. They can do it with ships, enough to take out the Great 
Satan, which is the United States, according to them, and the Little 
Satan, Israel.
  And this President is going to have a good time out in Las Vegas. Las 
Vegas can be fun, but not when the President says he is going to sign a 
law--wouldn't it be ironic if he decided to sign it at Caesars Palace, 
because the real Caesar's palace used to see that kind of thing on a 
regular basis, you know, a dictator, or Caesar just signing a law as he 
saw fit.
  But in this case, you would think a Caesar would not sign a law that 
would provide the ability to displace millions of Americans who have 
jobs and force them into the eventuality where 92 million Americans 
are. They have given up hope. They have given up on their dreams.
  If you believe the Bible, as I do, it makes clear that the government 
is here to protect people, to protect against evil, to encourage good 
conduct. That means following the law. You provide a protected 
environment in which people can be peacemakers and be meek and loving 
and kind and turn the other cheek.
  But that is not for the government. The government's role is to 
enforce the law as it is. And may God plant the seeds of wisdom in the 
right people in this administration so they will quit harming Americans 
who just want a job.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________