[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 159 (2013), Part 6]
[House]
[Pages 8898-9118]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




        NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that during further 
consideration of H.R. 1960, pursuant to House Resolution 260, amendment 
Nos. 18, 19, and 20 printed in part B of House Report 113-108 may be 
considered out of sequence.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from California?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 260 and rule 
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House 
on the state of the Union for the further consideration of the bill, 
H.R. 1960.
  Will the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Terry) kindly take the chair.

                              {time}  1436


                     In the Committee of the Whole

  Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 
for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military 
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal 
year, and for other purposes, with Mr. Terry (Acting Chair) in the 
chair.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The Acting CHAIR. When the Committee of the Whole rose on Wednesday, 
June 12, 2013, all time for general debate pursuant to House Resolution 
256 had expired.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 260, no further general debate shall be 
in order. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Armed Services, printed in the bill, it 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the 5-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the

[[Page 8899]]

text of Rules Committee Print 113-13, modified by the amendment printed 
in part A of House Report 113-108. The amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be considered as read.
  The text of the amendment in the nature of a substitute is as 
follows:

                               H.R. 1960

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014''.

     SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF 
                   CONTENTS.

       (a) Divisions.--This Act is organized into four divisions 
     as follows:
       (1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations.
       (2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations.
       (3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security 
     Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
       (4) Division D--Funding Tables.
       (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act 
     is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.

            DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

                          TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.

                       Subtitle B--Army Programs

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle 
              program.

                       Subtitle C--Navy Programs

Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for E-2D aircraft program.
Sec. 122. Cost limitation for CVN-78 aircraft carriers.

                     Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

Sec. 131. Multiyear procurement authority for multiple variants of the 
              C-130J aircraft program.
Sec. 132. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics 
              modernization program for C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 133. Retirement of KC-135R aircraft.
Sec. 134. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers.

       Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

Sec. 141. Multiyear procurement authority for ground-based 
              interceptors.
Sec. 142. Multiyear procurement authority for tactical wheeled 
              vehicles.
Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ-4 
              Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 144. Personal protection equipment procurement.
Sec. 145. Repeal of certain F-35 reporting requirements.
Sec. 146. Study on procurement of personal protection equipment.

         TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.

    Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 211. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle 
              engineering and manufacturing phase.
Sec. 212. Limitation on Milestone A activities for Unmanned Carrier-
              launched Surveillance and Strike system program.
Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics 
              transformation.
Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace 
              operations of the Air Force.
Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended 
              range munition program.
Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for the program manager 
              for biometrics of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 217. Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement.
Sec. 218. Long-range standoff weapon requirement.
Sec. 219. Review of software development for F-35 aircraft.
Sec. 220. Evaluation and assessment of the Distributed Common Ground 
              System.
Sec. 221. Requirement to complete individual carbine testing.
Sec. 222. Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for Navy 
              laser weapon system.
Sec. 223. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile 
              compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the 
              United Kingdom's Vanguard successor program.
Sec. 224. Sense of congress on counter-electronics high power microwave 
              missile project.

                  Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs

Sec. 231. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program.
Sec. 232. Additional missile defense site in the United States for 
              optimized protection of the homeland.
Sec. 233. Limitation on removal of missile defense equipment from East 
              Asia.
Sec. 234. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on 
              ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 235. Analysis of alternatives for successor to precision tracking 
              space system.
Sec. 236. Plan to improve organic kill assessment capability of the 
              ground-based midcourse defense system.
Sec. 237. Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket 
              defense program.
Sec. 238. NATO and the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in 
              Europe.
Sec. 239. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 
              exoatmospheric kill vehicle.
Sec. 240. Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic 
              Defense Initiative.

                          Subtitle D--Reports

Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat 
              vehicle acquisition program.
Sec. 252. Report on strategy to improve body armor.
Sec. 253. Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency initiative.
Sec. 254. Report on powered rail system.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 261. Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and 
              Advisory Board.
Sec. 262. Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in 
              defense experimental program to stimulate competitive 
              research.
Sec. 263. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for 
              defense laboratories for research and development of 
              technologies for military missions.
Sec. 264. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced 
              technology achievements.
Sec. 265. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology 
              protection features during research and development of 
              certain defense systems.
Sec. 266. Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university 
              affiliated research centers.

                  TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.

                   Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for 
              activities relating to operational energy strategy.
Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation 
              programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and 
              Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military 
              readiness activities.
Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act.
Sec. 314. Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management 
              related to Department of Defense readiness activities.
Sec. 315. Exclusions from definition of ``chemical substance'' under 
              Toxic Substances Control Act.
Sec. 316. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel 
              procurement requirement.
Sec. 317. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-
              air burn pits.
Sec. 318. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of 
              biofuels refineries.
Sec. 319. Limitation on procurement of biofuels.

                 Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

Sec. 321. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan.
Sec. 322. Review of critical manufacturing capabilities within Army 
              arsenals.
Sec. 323. Inclusion of Army arsenals capabilities in solicitations.

                          Subtitle D--Reports

Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and 
              unit readiness.
Sec. 332. Repeal of annual Comptroller General report on Army progress.
Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information 
              regarding information technology capital assets.

          Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

Sec. 341. Limitation on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force 
              Base, Azores.
Sec. 342. Prohibition on performance of Department of Defense flight 
              demonstration teams outside the United States.

                       Subtitle F--Other Matters

Sec. 351. Requirement to establish policy on joint combat uniforms.

              TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

                       Subtitle A--Active Forces

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.

[[Page 8900]]

Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum 
              levels.

                       Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the 
              reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status 
              technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on 
              active duty for operational support.

              Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 421. Military personnel.

                   TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

             Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

Sec. 501. Limitations on number of general and flag officers on active 
              duty.

                Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management

Sec. 511. Minimum notification requirements for members of reserve 
              components before deployment or cancellation of 
              deployment related to a contingency operation.
Sec. 512. Information to be provided to boards considering officers for 
              selective early removal from reserve active-status list.
Sec. 513. Temporary authority to maintain active status and inactive 
              status lists of members in the inactive National Guard.
Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve 
              component general and flag officers in an active status.
Sec. 515. Feasability study on establishing a unit of the National 
              Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the 
              Northern Mariana Islands.

                Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

Sec. 521. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System.
Sec. 522. Compliance requirements for organizational climate 
              assessments.
Sec. 523. Command responsibility and accountability for remains of 
              members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps 
              who die outside the United States.
Sec. 524. Contents of Transition Assistance Program.
Sec. 525. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel 
              decisions relating to correction of military records.
Sec. 526. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-
              neutral occupational standard for military career 
              designators.
Sec. 527. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to 
              protected communications of members of the Armed Forces 
              and prohibited retaliatory actions.
Sec. 528. Applicability of medical examination requirement regarding 
              post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury 
              to proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military 
              Justice.
Sec. 529. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to 
              close a prayer outside of a religious service according 
              to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises 
              of the endorsing faith group.
Sec. 530. Expansion and implementation of protection of rights of 
              conscience of members of the Armed Forces and chaplains 
              of such members.
Sec. 530A. Servicemembers' Accountability, Rights, and Responsibilities 
              Training.
Sec. 530B. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of 
              separation of members of the Armed Forces who made 
              unrestricted reports of sexual assault.
Sec. 530C. Report on data and information collected in connection with 
              Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and 
              regulations restricting service of female members of the 
              Armed Forces.
Sec. 530D. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service 
              Implementation Plan.

 Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and 
                                Response

Sec. 531. Limitations on convening authority discretion regarding 
              court-martial findings and sentence.
Sec. 532. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by 
              court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-
              related crimes.
Sec. 533. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and 
              trial of offenses by general courts-martial.
Sec. 534. Regulations regarding consideration of application for 
              permanent change of station or unit transfer by victims 
              of sexual assault.
Sec. 535. Consideration of need for, and authority to provide for, 
              temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a 
              member on active duty who is accused of committing a 
              sexual assault or related offense.
Sec. 536. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses and 
              related provisions.
Sec. 537. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory 
              personnel actions taken in response to making protected 
              communications regarding sexual assault.
Sec. 538. Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military 
              justice process.
Sec. 539. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense 
              investigative practices in response to allegations of 
              sex-related offenses.
Sec. 540. Uniform training and education programs for sexual assault 
              prevention and response program.
Sec. 541. Development of selection criteria for assignment as Sexual 
              Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual 
              Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim 
              Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
              Adolescent.
Sec. 542. Extension of crime victims' rights to victims of offenses 
              under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 543. Defense counsel interview of complaining witnesses in 
              presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a 
              Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.
Sec. 544. Participation by complaining witnesses in clemency phase of 
              courts-martial process.
Sec. 545. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to 
              unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim 
              is a member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 546. Amendment to Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate 
              considerations relating to character and military service 
              of accused in initial disposition of sex-related 
              offenses.
Sec. 547. Inclusion of letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of 
              reprimands and counseling statements.
Sec. 548. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members 
              of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and 
              training.
Sec. 549. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of 
              Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual 
              assault cases.
Sec. 550. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal 
              Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.

                 Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

Sec. 551. Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of 
              the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones.
Sec. 552. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are 
              members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 553. Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for 
              active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing.
Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of 
              members of the Armed Forces assigned to special 
              operations forces.

     Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness

Sec. 561. Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior 
              Reserve Officers' Training Corps program.
Sec. 562.  Improved climate assessments and dissemination and tracking 
              of results.
Sec. 563. Service-wide 360 assessments.
Sec. 564. Health welfare inspections.
Sec. 565. Review of security of military installations, including 
              barracks and multi-family residences.
Sec. 566. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training 
              for military occupational specialties with skills and 
              training required for civilian certifications and 
              licenses.
Sec. 567. Use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of 
              civilian certifications or licenses.

               Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational 
              agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed 
              Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 572. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and 
              transition of military dependent students.
Sec. 573. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary 
              and secondary education component of Department of 
              Defense education program.

                   Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

Sec. 581. Fraudulent representations about receipt of military 
              decorations or medals.
Sec. 582. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be 
              awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 583. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding 
              Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, 
              Air Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal.

[[Page 8901]]

Sec. 584. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and 
              Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements.
Sec. 585. Treatment of victims of the attacks at recruiting station in 
              Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas.
Sec. 586. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge.
Sec. 587. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to 
              Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael 
              Peralta.
Sec. 588. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross to 
              Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor 
              during the Korean War.

                       Subtitle I--Other Matters

Sec. 591. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect 
              consolidation of North Georgia College and State 
              University and Gainesville State College.
Sec. 592. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army 
              National Military Cemeteries.
Sec. 593. Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary 
              Issues.
Sec. 594. Commission on Service to the Nation.

          TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

                     Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates 
              of basic allowance for housing under certain 
              circumstances.

           Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay 
              authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay 
              authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for 
              nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 
              consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus 
              authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of 
              other title 37 bonuses and special pays.
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for 
              members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign 
              language proficiency.
Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen 
              enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

    Subtitle C--Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional 
                                Benefits

Sec. 621. Transitional compensation and other benefits for dependents 
              of certain members separated for violation of the Uniform 
              Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 622. Prevention of retired pay inversion for members whose retired 
              pay is computed using high-three average.

    Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 
                        Benefits and Operations

Sec. 631. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund 
              instrumentalities from reprisals.
Sec. 632. Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and 
              recyclable materials for resale in commissary and 
              exchange store systems.
Sec. 633. Correction of obsolete references to certain nonappropriated 
              fund instrumentalities.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 641. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and 
              disposition of human remains retained by the Department 
              of Defense for forensic pathology investigation.
Sec. 642. Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of 
              the reserve components as veterans.
Sec. 643. Survey of military pay and benefits preferences.

                   TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

              Subtitle A--Improvements to Health Benefits

Sec. 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 702. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed 
              Forces.

                 Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

Sec. 711. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain 
              beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime.
Sec. 712. Cooperative health care agreements between the military 
              departments and non-military health care entities.
Sec. 713. Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic 
              health record program.
Sec. 714. Pilot program on increased third-party collection 
              reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health 
              providers of the reserve components.
Sec. 722. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences 
              to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to 
              other nonprofit entities.
Sec. 723. Mental health support for military personnel and families.
Sec. 724. Research regarding hydrocephalus.
Sec. 725. Traumatic brain injury research.

  TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED 
                                MATTERS

             Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management

Sec. 801. Modification of reporting requirement for Department of 
              Defense business system acquisition programs when initial 
              operating capability is not achieved within five years of 
              Milestone A approval.
Sec. 802. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of 
              Defense laboratories.
Sec. 803. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available 
              for contract services.

Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, 
                            and Limitations

Sec. 811. Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations 
              relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit 
              electronic parts.
Sec. 812. Amendments relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit 
              electronic parts.
Sec. 813. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor 
              compensation.
Sec. 814. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain 
              reports.
Sec. 815.  Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving 
              suspension or debarment.
Sec. 816. Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be 
              given at least equal importance as technical or other 
              criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense 
              contracts.
Sec. 817. Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources.

Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency 
                   Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan

Sec. 821. Amendments relating to prohibition on contracting with the 
              enemy.
Sec. 822. Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and 
              Afghanistan.

                       Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 831. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose 
              nondevelopmental items.
Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services 
              produced in countries along a major route of supply to 
              Afghanistan.

      TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

              Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department 
              of the Navy and Marine Corps.
Sec. 902. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense 
              business enterprise architecture.

                      Subtitle B--Space Activities

Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy.
Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection.
Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy.
Sec. 914. Space control mission report.
Sec. 915. Responsive launch.

  Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in 
              commercial activities as security for intelligence 
              collection activities.
Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities.
Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service.
Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation.

                 Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters

Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of 
              Defense tactical data link systems.
Sec. 932. Defense Science Board assessment of United States Cyber 
              Command.
Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of 
              Defense.
Sec. 934. Notification of investigations related to compromise of 
              critical program information.
Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of 
              the Department of Defense.

                   Subtitle E--Total Force Management

Sec. 941. Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of Government 
              oversight of functions closely associated with inherently 
              Governmental functions.
Sec. 942. Five-year requirement for certification of appropriate 
              manpower performance.

                      TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                     Subtitle A--Financial Matters

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act.

[[Page 8902]]

Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial 
              statements.
Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security 
              Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization.

                  Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and 
              counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide 
              support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-
              terrorism activities.
Sec. 1013. Two-year extension of authority to provide additional 
              support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign 
              governments.
Sec. 1014. Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-
              Narcotic Program.

                Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Sec. 1021. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship 
              donations at no cost to the navy.
Sec. 1022. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of 
              Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.
Sec. 1023. Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards.
Sec. 1024. Sense of Congress regarding a balanced future naval force.
Sec. 1025. Authority for short-term extension or renewal of leases for 
              vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort 
              Program.

                      Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

Sec. 1030. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on 
              military commissions.
Sec. 1031. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism 
              Fellowship Program reporting requirement.
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify 
              facilities in the United States to house detainees 
              transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 
              Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1033. Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of 
              detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 
              Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities.
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release 
              of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, 
              Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1035. Unclassified summary of information relating to individuals 
              detained at Parwan, Afghanistan.
Sec. 1036. Assessment of affiliates and adherents of al-Qaeda outside 
              the United States.
Sec. 1037. Designation of Department of Defense senior official for 
              facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at 
              United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1038. Rank of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in 
              military commissions established to try individuals 
              detained at Guantanamo.
Sec. 1039. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, 
              rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at 
              Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen.
Sec. 1040. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at 
              Guantanamo if transferred to the United States.
Sec. 1040A. Summary of information relating to individuals detained at 
              Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist 
              groups.

               Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations

Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.
Sec. 1042. Report on process for determining targets of lethal 
              operations.
Sec. 1043. Counterterrorism operational briefings.

                       Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces

Sec. 1051. Prohibition on elimination of the nuclear triad.
Sec. 1052. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction of nuclear 
              forces.
Sec. 1053. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction or 
              consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe.
Sec. 1054. Statement of policy on implementation of any agreement for 
              further arms reduction below the levels of the New START 
              Treaty; limitation on retirement or dismantlement of 
              strategic delivery systems.
Sec. 1055. Sense of congress on compliance with nuclear arms control 
              agreements.
Sec. 1056. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently 
              targetable reentry vehicles.
Sec. 1057. Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People's 
              Republic of China.
Sec. 1058. Cost estimates for nuclear weapons.
Sec. 1059. Report on New START Treaty.

         Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

Sec. 1061. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to 
              analyze captured records.
Sec. 1062. Extension of authority to provide military transportation 
              services to certain other agencies at the Department of 
              Defense reimbursement rate.
Sec. 1063. Limitation on availability of funds for modification of 
              force structure of the Army.
Sec. 1064. Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation 
              activities.

                    Subtitle H--Studies and Reports

Sec. 1071. Oversight of combat support agencies.
Sec. 1072. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency 
              coordination relating to humanitarian demining 
              technology.
Sec. 1073. Extension of deadline for Comptroller General report on 
              assignment of civilian employees of the Department of 
              Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense.
Sec. 1074. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of 
              Department of Defense efficiencies.
Sec. 1075. Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 
              quadrennial defense review.
Sec. 1076. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations 
              Forces and United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 1077. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 1078. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress.
Sec. 1079. Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency 
              operation plan information to Congress.

                       Subtitle I--Other Matters

Sec. 1081. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1082. Transportation of supplies for the United States by aircraft 
              operated by United States air carriers.
Sec. 1083. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major 
              automated information system programs.
Sec. 1084. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to 
              issue non-premium aviation insurance.
Sec. 1085. Revision of compensation of members of the National 
              Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.
Sec. 1086. Protection of tier one task critical assets from 
              electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems.
Sec. 1087. Strategy for future military information operations 
              capabilities.
Sec. 1088. Compliance of military departments with minimum safe 
              staffing standards.
Sec. 1089. Determination and Disclosure of Transportation Costs 
              Incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips 
              outside the United States.

                  TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation 
              on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for 
              Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant 
              allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on 
              official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for 
              civilian employees of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments 
              to Department of Defense employees.
Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department 
              of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for 
              Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program.
Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology 
              personnel.
Sec. 1107. Defense Science Initiative for Personnel.

             TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

                  Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to 
              program to build the capacity of foreign military forces.
Sec. 1202. Three-year extension of authorization for non-conventional 
              assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1203. Global Security Contingency Fund.
Sec. 1204. Codification of National Guard State Partnership Program.
Sec. 1205. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of 
              certain foreign countries to respond to incidents 
              involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the 
              region.
Sec. 1206. One-year extension of authority to support foreign forces 
              participating in operations to disarm the Lord's 
              Resistance Army.

    Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

Sec. 1211. One-year extension and modification of authority for 
              reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support 
              provided to United States military operations.
Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for 
              reintegration activities in Afghanistan.

[[Page 8903]]

Sec. 1213. Extension of Commanders' Emergency Response Program in 
              Afghanistan.
Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to support operations and activities 
              of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program 
              to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in 
              Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. Special immigrant visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies.
Sec. 1217. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to 
              Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all 
              taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are 
              not reimbursed by Afghanistan.

         Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014

Sec. 1221. Modification of report on progress toward security and 
              stability in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1222. Sense of Congress on United States military support in 
              Afghanistan.
Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities 
              for Afghanistan.

                  Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran

Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf 
              Cooperation Council countries.
Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of 
              Iran.
Sec. 1233. Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf.

                 Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters

Sec. 1241. Report on posture and readiness of United States Armed 
              Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa 
              and the Middle East.
Sec. 1242. Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national 
              security.
Sec. 1243. Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean 
              peninsula.
Sec. 1244. Sense of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia.
Sec. 1245. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations 
              Forces Coordination Centers.
Sec. 1246. Additional reports on military and security developments 
              involving the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and 
              Disarmament Act.
Sec. 1248. Limitation on funds to provide the Russian Federation with 
              access to certain missile defense technology.
Sec. 1249. Reports on actions to reduce support of ballistic missile 
              programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea.
Sec. 1250. Congressional notifications relating to status of forces 
              agreements.
Sec. 1251. Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria.
Sec. 1252. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support 
              organizations and related NATO agreements.
Sec. 1253. Limitation on funds to implement executive agreements 
              relating to United States missile defense capabilities.
Sec. 1254. Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction 
              Engagement activities and United States contributions to 
              the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization.
Sec. 1255. Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation 
              between the United States and Burma.
Sec. 1256. Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces 
              in Europe.
Sec. 1257. Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People's 
              Republic of China.
Sec. 1258. Rule of construction.

                TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and 
              funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.
Sec. 1303. Extension for use of contributions to the Cooperative Threat 
              Reduction Program.

                    TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

                     Subtitle A--Military Programs

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. National defense sealift fund.
Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1404. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide.
Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program.

                 Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a 
              strategic and critical materials supply.
Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National 
              Defense Stockpile.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of 
              Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility 
              Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health 
              Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement 
              Home.
Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses.

   TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS 
                         CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

         Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations

Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1505. Military personnel.
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program.

                     Subtitle B--Financial Matters

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority.

               Subtitle C--Limitations and Other Matters

Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1532. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat 
              Organization.
Sec. 1533. Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
              support for Operation Observant Compass.
Sec. 1534. Report on United States force levels and costs of military 
              operations in Afghanistan.

                   TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector 
              General of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1602. Expansion of the procurement technical assistance program to 
              advance small business growth.
Sec. 1603. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance 
              Cooperative Agreement Program.
Sec. 1604. Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of 
              meals ready-to-eat.
Sec. 1605. Foreign commercial satellite services.
Sec. 1606. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program.

            DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be 
              specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.

                 TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 
              project.
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2010 project.
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2011 project.
Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 
              projects.
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 
              projects.

                 TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain 
              fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2011 project.
Sec. 2207. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2012 project.
Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 
              projects.

              TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition 
              projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2013 project.
Sec. 2306. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain 
              fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 
              project.

[[Page 8904]]

           TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

               Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.

          Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization 
              construction, defense-wide.

   TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT 
                                PROGRAM

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.

            TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

 Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition 
              projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
              construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land 
              acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.

                       Subtitle B--Other Matters

Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 
              2013 project.
Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 
              projects.

          TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and 
              closure activities funded through Department of Defense 
              Base Closure Account.

                       Subtitle B--Other Matters

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and 
              Closure (BRAC) round.
Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding 
              availability of military health care in National Capital 
              Region.

         TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

 Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 
                                Changes

Sec. 2801. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor 
              military construction.
Sec. 2802. Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room 
              patterns and floor areas for military family housing and 
              submission of net floor area information.
Sec. 2803. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited 
              partnerships with private developers of housing.
Sec. 2804. Military construction standards to reduce vulnerability of 
              structures to terrorist attack.
Sec. 2805. Treatment of payments received for providing utilities and 
              services in connection with use of alternative authority 
              for acquisition and improvement of military housing.
Sec. 2806. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of 
              military housing investment authority.
Sec. 2807. Additional element for annual report on military housing 
              privatization projects.
Sec. 2808. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation 
              and maintenance funds for construction projects in 
              certain areas outside the United States.

        Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

Sec. 2811. Codification of policies and requirements regarding closure 
              and realignment of United States military installations 
              in foreign countries.

                      Subtitle C--Energy Security

Sec. 2821. Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in 
              Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum 
              certification.

  Subtitle D--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

Sec. 2831. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year 
              for period covered by annual report of Interagency 
              Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam 
              Realignment.
Sec. 2832. Repeal of certain restrictions on realignment of Marine 
              Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region.

                      Subtitle E--Land Conveyances

Sec. 2841. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, 
              California.
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura 
              County, California.
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, 
              Pennsylvania.
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah.
Sec. 2845. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, 
              Wasatch Mountains, Utah.
Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia.
Sec. 2847. Land conveyance, Mifflin County United States Army Reserve 
              Center, Lewistown, Pennsylvania.

                       Subtitle F--Other Matters

Sec. 2861. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting 
              requirement.
Sec. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security 
              Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 
              Security Studies.
Sec. 2863. Redesignation of the Graduate School of Nursing at the 
              Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences as 
              the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing.
Sec. 2864. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National 
              Historical Park, Ohio.
Sec. 2865. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial 
              in Riverside, California.

   TITLE XXIX--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project.

TITLE XXX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT READINESS 
                              AND SECURITY

           Subtitle A--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana

Sec. 3001. Withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone 
              Hills Training Area, Montana.
Sec. 3002. Management of withdrawn and reserved lands.
Sec. 3003. Special rules governing minerals management.
Sec. 3004. Grazing.
Sec. 3005. Duration of withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 3006. Payments in lieu of taxes.
Sec. 3007. Hunting, fishing and trapping.
Sec. 3008. Water rights.
Sec. 3009. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression.
Sec. 3010. On-going decontamination.
Sec. 3011. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 3012. Limitation on subsequent availability of lands for 
              appropriation.
Sec. 3013. Relinquishment.

           Subtitle B--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

Sec. 3021. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, White Sands Missile 
              Range, New Mexico.
Sec. 3022. Water rights.
Sec. 3023. Withdrawal.

      Subtitle C--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

Sec. 3031. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Weapons 
              Station China Lake, California.
Sec. 3032. Water rights.
Sec. 3033. Withdrawal.

    Subtitle D--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California

Sec. 3041. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Chocolate Mountain 
              Aerial Gunnery Range, California.
Sec. 3042. Management and use of transferred land.
Sec. 3043. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title.
Sec. 3044. Effect of termination of military use.
Sec. 3045. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period.
Sec. 3046. Water rights.

  Subtitle E--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, 
                               California

Sec. 3051. Designation of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle 
              Recreation Area.
Sec. 3052. Limited biannual Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center 
              Twentynine Palms use of Johnson Valley National Off-
              Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.
Sec. 3053. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study 
              Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine 
              Palms, California.
Sec. 3054. Water rights.

              Subtitle F--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

Sec. 3061. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station 
              Fallon, Nevada.
Sec. 3062. Water rights.
Sec. 3063. Withdrawal.

 DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND 
                          OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

      TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

         Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.

[[Page 8905]]

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance.

   Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security 
              Administration.
Sec. 3112. Termination of Department of Energy employees to protect 
              national security.
Sec. 3113. Modification of independent cost estimates on life extension 
              programs and new nuclear facilities.
Sec. 3114. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank farm 
              waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3115. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.
Sec. 3116. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear 
              Security Administration.
Sec. 3117. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the 
              Administrator.
Sec. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Global Threat 
              Reduction Initiative.
Sec. 3119. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, 
              Testing, and Response.
Sec. 3120. Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and 
              operating contracts.
Sec. 3121. W88-1 warhead and W78-1 warhead life extension options.
Sec. 3122. Extension of principles of pilot program to additional 
              facilities of the nuclear security enterprise.

                          Subtitle C--Reports

Sec. 3131. Annual report and certification on status of the security of 
              the nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3132. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of 
              the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Sec. 3133. Repeal of certain reporting requirements.

                       Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 3141. Congressional advisory panel on the governance of the 
              nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3142. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries.
Sec. 3143. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

          TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Sec. 3202. Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

                 TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.

                  TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security 
              aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014.
Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program.
Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress.

                       DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.

                         TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

Sec. 4101. Procurement.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.

        TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas 
              contingency operations.

                 TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency 
              operations.

                     TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.

                    TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.

                   TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 4601. Military construction.

      TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.

     SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.

       In this Act, the term ``congressional defense committees'' 
     has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of 
     title 10, United States Code.

            DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

                          TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

        Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the 
     Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4101.

                       Subtitle B--Army Programs

     SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR STRYKER 
                   VEHICLE PROGRAM.

       (a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 
     for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the 
     procurement or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75 
     percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 
     days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of 
     the Army submits the report under subsection (b).
       (b) Report Required.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
     the status of the Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory 
     located in Auburn, Washington, cited in the report of the 
     Inspector General of the Department of Defense (number 2013-
     025) dated November 30, 2012. The report submitted under this 
     subsection shall include the following:
       (1) The status of the implementation by the Secretary of 
     the recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of the report 
     by the Inspector General.
       (2) The value of the parts remaining in warehouse that may 
     still be used by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or 
     reset of Stryker vehicles.
       (3) The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse that 
     are no longer usable by the Secretary for the repair, 
     upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles.
       (4) A cost estimate of the monthly cost of maintaining the 
     inventory of parts no longer usable by the Secretary.
       (5) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.

                       Subtitle C--Navy Programs

     SEC. 121. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR E-2D AIRCRAFT 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to 
     section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary 
     of the Navy may enter into--
       (1) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 
     fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of E-2D 
     aircraft; and
       (2) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 
     fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission 
     equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract 
     entered into under paragraph (1).
       (b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract 
     entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any 
     obligation of the United States to make a payment under the 
     contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject 
     to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for 
     such later fiscal year.

     SEC. 122. COST LIMITATION FOR CVN-78 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.

       (a) In General.--Section 122 of the John Warner National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 
     109-364; 120 Stat. 2104) is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 122. ADHERENCE TO NAVY COST ESTIMATES FOR CVN-78 CLASS 
                   OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.

       ``(a) Limitation.--
       ``(1) Lead ship.--The total amount obligated from funds 
     appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and 
     Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for 
     the aircraft carrier designated as CVN-78 may not exceed 
     $12,887,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).
       ``(2) Follow-on ships.--The total amount obligated from 
     funds appropriated or otherwise made available for 
     Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other 
     procurement account, for the construction of any ship that is 
     constructed in the CVN-78 class of aircraft carriers after 
     the lead ship of that class may not exceed $11,411,000,000 
     (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).
       ``(b) Adjustment of Limitation Amount.--The Secretary of 
     the Navy may adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) 
     for any ship constructed in the CVN-78 class of aircraft 
     carriers by the following:
       ``(1) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs 
     attributable to economic inflation after September 30, 2013.
       ``(2) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs 
     attributable to compliance with changes in Federal, State, or 
     local laws.
       ``(3) The amounts of outfitting costs and post-delivery 
     costs incurred for that ship.
       ``(4) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of 
     that ship that are attributable to insertion of new 
     technology into that ship, as compared to the technology 
     baseline as it was defined in the approved acquisition 
     program baseline estimate of December 2005.
       ``(5) The amounts of increases or decreases to nonrecurring 
     design and engineering cost attributable to achieving 
     compliance with the cost limitation.
       ``(6) The amounts of increases or decreases to cost 
     required to correct deficiencies that may affect the safety 
     of the ship and personnel or otherwise preclude the ship from 
     safe operations and crew certification.
       ``(7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as 
     CVN-78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of 
     that ship that are attributable to the shipboard test 
     program.
       ``(c) Limitation on Technology Insertion Cost Adjustment.--
     The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority under 
     paragraph (4) of subsection (b) to adjust the amount set 
     forth in

[[Page 8906]]

     subsection (a) for a ship referred to in that subsection with 
     respect to insertion of new technology into that ship only 
     if--
       ``(1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the 
     congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new 
     technology would lower the life-cycle cost of the ship; or
       ``(2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the 
     congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new 
     technology is required to meet an emerging threat and the 
     Secretary of Defense certifies to those committees that such 
     threat poses grave harm to national security.
       ``(d) Notice.--
       ``(1) Requirement.--The Secretary of the Navy shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees each year, at the 
     same time that the budget is submitted under section 1105(a) 
     of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year, 
     written notice of--
       ``(A) any change in the amount set forth in subsection (a) 
     during the preceding fiscal year that the Secretary has 
     determined to be associated with a cost referred to in 
     subsection (b); and
       ``(B) the most accurate estimate possible of the Secretary 
     with respect to the total cost compared to the amount set 
     forth in subsection (a), as adjusted by subsection (b), and 
     the steps the Secretary is taking to reduce the costs below 
     such amount.
       ``(2) Effective date.--The requirement in paragraph (1) 
     shall become effective with the budget request for the year 
     of procurement of the first ship referred to in subsection 
     (a).''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents at the 
     beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item 
     relating to section 122 and inserting the following:

``Sec. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN-78 class of 
              aircraft carriers.''.

                     Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

     SEC. 131. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR MULTIPLE 
                   VARIANTS OF THE C-130J AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.

       (a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to 
     section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary 
     of the Air Force may enter into--
       (1) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 
     fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of 
     multiple variants of C-130J aircraft for the Department of 
     the Navy and the Department of the Air Force; and
       (2) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 
     fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission 
     equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract 
     entered into under paragraph (1).
       (b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract 
     entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any 
     obligation of the United States to make a payment under the 
     contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject 
     to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for 
     such later fiscal year.

     SEC. 132. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF 
                   AVIONICS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C-130 
                   AIRCRAFT.

       (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of the Air Force may not 
     take any action to cancel or modify the avionics 
     modernization program of record for C-130 aircraft.
       (b) Conforming Repeal.--Section 143 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1662) is repealed.

     SEC. 133. RETIREMENT OF KC-135R AIRCRAFT.

       (a) Treatment of Retired KC-135R Aircraft.--Except as 
     provided by subsection (b) and (c), the Secretary of the Air 
     Force shall maintain each KC-135R aircraft that is retired by 
     the Secretary in a condition that would allow recall of that 
     aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air 
     National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force 
     structure.
       (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to a KC-135R 
     aircraft that the Secretary transfers or sells to allies or 
     partner nations of the United States.
       (c) Delivery of KC-46A Aircraft.--For each KC-46A aircraft 
     that is delivered to the Air Force and the Commander of the 
     Air Mobility Command initially certifies as mission capable, 
     the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (a) 
     with respect to one retired KC-135R aircraft.
       (d) Conforming Repeal.--Section 135 of the John Warner 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 
     (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2114) is repealed.

     SEC. 134. COMPETITION FOR EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE 
                   PROVIDERS.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The new acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable 
     launch vehicle program of the Air Force will maintain mission 
     assurance, reduce costs, and provide opportunities for 
     competition for certified launch providers.
       (2) The method in which the current and potential future 
     certified launch providers will be evaluated in a competition 
     is still under development.
       (b) Plan.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall 
     develop and implement a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of 
     competing contractors in awarding a contract to a certified 
     evolved expendable launch vehicle provider.
       (2) Comparison.--The plan under paragraph (1) shall include 
     a description of how the following areas will be addressed in 
     the evaluation:
       (A) The proposed cost, schedule, and performance.
       (B) Mission assurance activities.
       (C) The manner in which the contractor will operate under 
     the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
       (D) The effect of other contracts in which the contractor 
     is entered into with the Federal Government, such as the 
     evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability contract 
     and the space station commercial resupply services contracts.
       (E) Any other areas the Secretary determines appropriate.
       (c) Submission to Congress.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
       (A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
     report that includes the plan under subsection (b)(1); or
       (B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan.
       (2) GAO review.--The Comptroller General of the United 
     States shall--
       (A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
     review of the plan under subsection (b)(1); or
       (B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan.
       (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this 
     subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means the following:
       (A) The congressional defense committees.
       (B) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, 
     Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
       (C) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
     House of Representatives and the Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the Senate.

       Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

     SEC. 141. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR GROUND-BASED 
                   INTERCEPTORS.

       (a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to 
     section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Director 
     of the Missile Defense Agency may enter into one or more 
     multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 
     program year, for the procurement of 14 ground-based 
     interceptors.
       (b) Authority for Advance Procurement.--The Director may 
     enter into one or more contracts for advance procurement 
     associated with the ground-based interceptors for which 
     authorization to enter into a multiyear procurement contract 
     is provided under subsection (a).
       (c) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract 
     entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any 
     obligation of the United States to make a payment under the 
     contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject 
     to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for 
     such later fiscal year.

     SEC. 142. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR TACTICAL 
                   WHEELED VEHICLES.

       (a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--Subject to 
     section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary 
     of Defense may enter into one or more multiyear, multivehicle 
     contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, 
     for the procurement of core tactical wheeled vehicles.
       (b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract 
     entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any 
     obligation of the United States to make a payment under the 
     contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject 
     to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for 
     such later fiscal year.
       (c) Notification Required.--Not later than 180 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     notify the congressional defense committees of--
       (1) whether the Secretary will enter into a contract under 
     subsection (a); and
       (2) if not, an explanation for why the Secretary will not 
     enter into such a contract.
       (d) Annual Reports.--For each fiscal year in which the 
     Secretary is entered into a contract under this section, the 
     Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees, as part of the material submitted in support of 
     the budget of the President for such fiscal year, as 
     submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 
     31, United States Code, the following:
       (1) The status of procurements under such contract.
       (2) A detailed analysis of any cost savings achieved for 
     each class of vehicle procured under such contract.
       (3) A description of any challenges to the Secretary in 
     carrying out this section or in achieving any such cost 
     savings.
       (4) Any recommendations for future implementation of a 
     program for multiyear, multi-vehicle procurement.
       (e) Termination of Authority.--The Secretary may not enter 
     into a contract under this section after September 30, 2018. 
     During the five-year period beginning on October 1, 2018, the 
     Secretary may continue to carry out any contract entered into 
     under this section before such date using funds made 
     available to the Secretary for such purpose before such date.
       (f) Core Tactical Vehicles Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``core tactical wheeled vehicles'' means--
       (1) the family of medium tactical vehicles;
       (2) medium tactical wheeled vehicle replacements;
       (3) the family of heavy tactical vehicles; and
       (4) logistics vehicle system replacements.

[[Page 8907]]



     SEC. 143. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT 
                   OF RQ-4 GLOBAL HAWK UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be 
     obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place 
     in storage an RQ-4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft 
     system.
       (b) Maintained Levels.--During the period preceding 
     December 31, 2016, in supporting the operational requirements 
     of the combatant commands, the Secretary of the Air Force 
     shall maintain the operational capability of each RQ-4 Block 
     30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system belonging to the Air 
     Force or delivered to the Air Force during such period.
       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 154 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 1666) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``(a) Limitation.--''; and
       (2) by striking subsection (b).

     SEC. 144. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT.

       (a) Procurement.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
     that personal protection equipment is procured using funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by section 101 and available 
     for such purpose as specified in the funding table in 
     sections 4101 and 4102.
       (b) Procurement Line Item.--In the budget materials 
     submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in 
     connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to 
     section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget 
     for fiscal year 2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the 
     Secretary shall ensure that within each military department 
     procurement account, a separate, dedicated procurement line 
     item is designated for personal protection equipment.
       (c) Personal Protection Equipment Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``personal protection equipment'' means the 
     following:
       (1) Body armor components.
       (2) Combat helmets.
       (3) Combat protective eyewear.
       (4) Protective clothing.
       (5) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

     SEC. 145. REPEAL OF CERTAIN F-35 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

       Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4157) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (b); and
       (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

     SEC. 146. STUDY ON PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTION 
                   EQUIPMENT.

       (a) Study.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     enter into a contract with a federally funded research and 
     development center to conduct a study to identify and assess 
     alternative and effective means for stimulating competition 
     and innovation in the personal protection equipment 
     industrial base.
       (2) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and 
     development center conducting the study under paragraph (1) 
     shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any 
     findings and recommendations.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 270 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the study 
     conducted under subsection (a)(1).
       (2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
     include the following:
       (A) The study, findings, and recommendations submitted to 
     the Secretary under subsection (a)(2).
       (B) An assessment of current and future technologies that 
     could markedly improve body armor, including by decreasing 
     weight, increasing survivability, and making other relevant 
     improvements.
       (C) An analysis of the capability of the personal 
     protection equipment industrial base to leverage such 
     technologies to produce the next generation body armor.
       (D) An assessment of alternative body armor acquisition 
     models, including different types of contracting and 
     budgeting practices of the Department of Defense.
       (c) Personal Protection Equipment.--In this section, the 
     term ``personal protection equipment'' includes body armor.

         TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

        Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for 
     research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in 
     the funding table in section 4201.

    Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

     SEC. 211. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GROUND 
                   COMBAT VEHICLE ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 
                   PHASE.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army 
     may be obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering 
     and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground 
     combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed 
     following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits 
     to the congressional defense committees a report that 
     includes the following:
       (1) An independent assessment of the draft milestone B 
     documentation for the ground combat vehicle that--
       (A) is performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and 
     Program Evaluation, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
     Research and Engineering, or other similar official; and
       (B) analyzes whether there is a sufficient business case to 
     proceed with the engineering and manufacturing development 
     phase for the ground combat vehicle using only one 
     contractor.
       (2) A certification by the Secretary that the ground combat 
     vehicle program has--
       (A) feasible and fully-defined requirements;
       (B) fully mature technologies;
       (C) independent and high-confidence cost estimates;
       (D) available funding; and
       (E) a realistic and achievable schedule.

     SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON MILESTONE A ACTIVITIES FOR UNMANNED 
                   CARRIER-LAUNCHED SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE SYSTEM 
                   PROGRAM.

       The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
     and Logistics may not award a Milestone A technology 
     development contract with respect to the Unmanned Carrier-
     launched Surveillance and Strike system program until a 
     period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the 
     Under Secretary certifies to the congressional defense 
     committees that the software and system engineering designs 
     for the control system and connectivity and aircraft carrier 
     segments of such program can achieve, with low level of 
     integration risk, successful compatibility and 
     interoperability with the air vehicle segment selected for 
     contract award with respect to such program.

     SEC. 213. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIR FORCE 
                   LOGISTICS TRANSFORMATION.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 
     procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and 
     evaluation, Air Force, for logistics information technology, 
     including for the expeditionary combat support system, not 
     more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the 
     date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of 
     the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees 
     a report on how the Secretary will modernize and update the 
     logistics information technology systems of the Air Force 
     following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat 
     support system. Such report shall include--
       (1) strategies to--
       (A) in the near term, address any gaps in capability with 
     respect to logistics information technology; and
       (B) during the period covered by the current future-years 
     defense plan, provide for long-term modernization of 
     logistics information technology;
       (2) an analysis of the root causes leading to the failure 
     of the expeditionary combat support system program; and
       (3) a plan of action by the Secretary to ensure that the 
     lessons learned under such analysis are--
       (A) shared throughout the Department of Defense and the 
     military departments; and
       (B) considered in program planning for similar logistics 
     information technology systems.

     SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSIVE 
                   CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS OF THE AIR FORCE.

       (a) Limitation.-- Of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, or research, 
     development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for Defensive 
     Cyberspace Operations (Program Element 0202088F), not more 
     than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until a period 
     of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the 
     Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional 
     defense committees a report on the Application Software 
     Assurance Center of Excellence.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) A description of how the Application Software Assurance 
     Center of Excellence is used to support the software 
     assurance activities of the Air Force and other elements of 
     the Department of Defense, including pursuant to section 933 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (Public Law 112-239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note).
       (2) A description of the resources used to support the 
     Center of Excellence from the beginning of the Center through 
     fiscal year 2014.
       (3) The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the Center of 
     Excellence during the period covered by the future-years 
     defense program submitted in 2013 under section 221 of title 
     10, United States Code.

     SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PRECISION 
                   EXTENDED RANGE MUNITION PROGRAM.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be 
     obligated or expended for the precision extended range 
     munition program until the date on which the Under Secretary 
     of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits 
     to the congressional defense committees written certification 
     that--

[[Page 8908]]

       (1) such program is necessary to meet a valid operational 
     need that cannot be met by the existing precision guided 
     mortar munition of the Army, other indirect fire weapons, or 
     aerial-delivered joint fires; and
       (2) a sufficient business case exists to proceed with 
     development and production of such program.

     SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PROGRAM 
                   MANAGER FOR BIOMETRICS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE.

       (a) Limitation.-- Of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for research, development, test, and 
     evaluation for the Department of Defense program manager for 
     biometrics for future biometric architectures or systems, not 
     more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a 
     period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the 
     Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense 
     committees a report assessing the future program structure 
     for biometrics oversight and execution and architectural 
     requirements for biometrics enabling capability.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) An assessment of the roles and responsibilities of the 
     principal staff assistant for biometrics, the program manager 
     for biometrics, and the Biometrics Identity Management 
     Agency, including an analysis of alternatives to evaluate--
       (A) how to better align responsibilities for the multiple 
     elements of the military departments and the Department of 
     Defense with responsibility for biometrics, including the 
     Navy and the Marine Corps; the Office of the Provost Marshall 
     General, and the intelligence community; and
       (B) whether the program management responsibilities of the 
     Department of Defense program manager for biometrics should 
     be retained by the Army or transferred to another military 
     department or element of the Department based on the expected 
     future operating environment.
       (2) An assessment of the current requirements for the 
     biometrics enabling capability to ensure the capability 
     continues to meet the needs of the relevant military 
     departments and elements of the Department of Defense based 
     on the future operating environment after the drawdown in 
     Afghanistan.
       (3) An analysis of the need to merge the program management 
     structures and systems architecture and requirements 
     development process for biometrics and forensics 
     applications.

     SEC. 217. UNMANNED COMBAT AIR SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION TESTING 
                   REQUIREMENT.

       Not later than October 1, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy 
     shall demonstrate, with respect to the X-47B unmanned combat 
     air system aircraft, the following:
       (1) Unmanned autonomous rendezvous and aerial-refueling 
     operations using the receptacle and probe equipment of the X-
     47B aircraft.
       (2) The ability of such aircraft to on-load fuel from 
     airborne tanker aircraft using both the boom and drogue 
     equipment installed on the tanker aircraft.

     SEC. 218. LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON REQUIREMENT.

       The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a follow-on 
     air-launched cruise missile to the AGM-86 that--
       (2) achieves initial operating capability for both 
     conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030; and
       (3) is certified for internal carriage and employment for 
     both conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation 
     long-range strike bomber by not later than 2034.

     SEC. 219. REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F-35 AIRCRAFT.

       (a) Review.--The Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish an 
     independent team consisting of subject matter experts to 
     review the development of software for the F-35 aircraft 
     program (in this section referred to as the ``software 
     development program''), including by reviewing the progress 
     made in--
       (1) managing the software development program; and
       (2) delivering critical software capability in accordance 
     with current program milestones.
       (b) Report.--Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under 
     Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report on the review under subsection (a). Such 
     report shall include the following:
       (1) An assessment by the independent team with respect to 
     whether the software development program--
       (A) has been successful in meeting the key milestone dates 
     occurring before the date of the report; and
       (B) will be successful in meeting the established program 
     schedule.
       (2) Any recommendations of the independent team with 
     respect to improving the software development program to 
     ensure that, in support of the start of initial operational 
     testing, the established program schedule is met on time.
       (3) If the independent team determines that the software 
     development program will be unable to deliver the full 
     complement of software within the established program 
     schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent 
     team considers appropriate to deliver such software within 
     such schedule.

     SEC. 220. EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTED COMMON 
                   GROUND SYSTEM.

       (a) Project Codes for Budget Submissions.--In the budget 
     transmitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 
     of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and 
     each subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within 
     the distributed common ground system program shall be set 
     forth as a separate project code within the program element 
     line, and each covered official shall submit supporting 
     justification for the project code within the program element 
     descriptive summary.
       (b) Analysis.--
       (1) Requirement.--The Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an 
     analysis of commercial link analysis tools that are compliant 
     with the intelligence community data standards and could be 
     used to meet the requirements of the distributed common 
     ground system program.
       (2) Elements.--The analysis required under paragraph (1) 
     shall include the following:
       (A) Revalidation of the distributed common ground system 
     program requirements for link analysis tools based on current 
     program needs, recent operational experience, and the 
     requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-
     architecture principles.
       (B) Market research of current commercially available link 
     analysis tools to determine which tools, if any, could 
     potentially satisfy the requirements described in 
     subparagraph (A).
       (C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for any 
     commercially available link analysis tools identified in 
     subparagraph (B).
       (3) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees the results of the 
     analysis conducted under paragraph (1).
       (c) Competition Required.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (3), if 
     the Under Secretary identifies one or more commercial link 
     analysis tools under subsection (b) (other than such tools 
     offered by the current technology provider) that meet the 
     requirements for the distributed common ground system 
     program, including the requirement for nonproprietary 
     solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles, each 
     covered official shall initiate a request for proposals for 
     such link analysis tools by not later than 180 days after the 
     Under Secretary makes such identification. Such a request for 
     proposals shall be based on market research and competitive 
     procedures in accordance with applicable law and the Defense 
     Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement.
       (2) Notification.--Each covered official shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees written notification of 
     any request for proposals issued under paragraph (1) by not 
     later than 30 days after such request is issued.
       (3) Waiver of rfp timeline.--If a covered official 
     determines that issuing a request for proposals by the date 
     specified in paragraph (1) would not be aligned with the 
     acquisition or developmental milestones of the distributed 
     common ground station program, the covered official may waive 
     the requirement to issue such a request for proposals by such 
     date if the covered official submits to the congressional 
     defense committees a written notification of such waiver that 
     includes--
       (A) the reasons for making such a waiver; and
       (B) identification of when in the acquisition timeline of 
     such program that the covered official plans to issue the 
     request for proposals.
       (d) Covered Official Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``covered official'' means the following:
       (1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters 
     concerning the Army.
       (2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters 
     concerning the Navy.
       (3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters 
     concerning the Air Force.
       (4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to 
     matters concerning the Marine Corps.
       (5) The Commander of the United States Special Operations 
     Command, with respect to matters concerning the United States 
     Special Operations Command.

     SEC. 221. REQUIREMENT TO COMPLETE INDIVIDUAL CARBINE TESTING.

       The Secretary of the Army may not cancel the individual 
     carbine program unless the Secretary--
       (1) completes the Phase III down-select and user-evaluation 
     phase of the individual carbine competitors;
       (2) conducts the required comprehensive business case 
     analysis of such program; and
       (3) submits to the congressional defense committees--
       (A) the results of the down-select and user evaluation 
     described in paragraph (1); and
       (B) the business case analysis described in paragraph (2).

     SEC. 222. ESTABLISHMENT OF FUNDING LINE AND FIELDING PLAN FOR 
                   NAVY LASER WEAPON SYSTEM.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall ensure that each 
     future-years defense program submitted to Congress under 
     section 221 of title 10, United States Code, that covers any 
     of fiscal years 2018 through 2028 includes a funding line and 
     fielding plan for a Navy laser weapon system with respect to 
     such fiscal years.
       (b) Alternative Report.--If the Secretary determines that 
     the technology and maturation efforts of a Navy laser weapon 
     system conducted prior to fiscal year 2016 do not indicate 
     that suitable technology warranting a program of record for 
     such system will be available by 2018, the Secretary may 
     waive the requirements of

[[Page 8909]]

     subsection (a) if the Secretary submits to the congressional 
     defense committees written justification of such 
     determination, including a description of the technical 
     shortcomings of such system, by not later than March 30, 
     2016.

     SEC. 223. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPORTANCE OF ALIGNING COMMON 
                   MISSILE COMPARTMENT OF OHIO-CLASS REPLACEMENT 
                   PROGRAM WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM'S VANGUARD 
                   SUCCESSOR PROGRAM.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The Polaris Sales Agreement of 1963 formally arranged 
     for the Polaris missile system to be purchased by the United 
     Kingdom for its submarines. It was extended in 1982 to 
     include the Trident missile system and this agreement 
     continues to underpin the independent nuclear deterrent of 
     the United Kingdom.
       (2) April 2013 marked the 50-year anniversary of the 
     agreement.
       (3) Since the inception of the agreement, the agreement has 
     been a tremendous success and provided great benefits to both 
     nations by creating major cost savings, stronger nuclear 
     deterrence, and a stronger alliance.
       (4) The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement 
     of the United States and the Vanguard-class ballistic missile 
     successor of the United Kingdom will share a common missile 
     compartment and the Trident II/D5 strategic weapon system.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy should 
     make every effort to ensure that the common missile 
     compartment associated with the Ohio-class ballistic missile 
     submarine replacement program stays on schedule and is 
     aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of the United 
     Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill its 
     longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based 
     strategic deterrence.

     SEC. 224. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COUNTER-ELECTRONICS HIGH POWER 
                   MICROWAVE MISSILE PROJECT.

       It is the sense of the Congress that--
       (1) following the successful joint technology capability 
     demonstration that the counter-electronics high power 
     microwave missile project (in this section referred to as 
     ``CHAMP'') conducted last year, the Air Force should examine 
     the results of the demonstration and consider the 
     demonstration as a potential solution during any analysis of 
     alternatives conducted in 2014;
       (2) an analysis of alternatives is an important step in the 
     long term-term development of a high power microwave weapon;
       (3) additionally, a near-term option may be available to 
     get such capability to commanders of the combatant commands 
     should the capability be required;
       (4) the Secretary of the Air Force should pursue both near- 
     and long-term high power microwave weapon systems;
       (5) CHAMP could be developed as a cruise missile delivered 
     weapon with target availability to commanders of the 
     combatant commands by 2016; and
       (6) such development should not prohibit or divert 
     resources from an analysis of alternatives and long-term 
     development of a high power microwave weapon.

                  Subtitle C--Missile Defense Programs

     SEC. 231. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MEADS PROGRAM.

       (a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be 
     obligated or expended for the medium extended air defense 
     system.
       (b) Harvesting Technology.--
       (1) Notice and wait.--The Secretary of Defense may not 
     carry out actions described in paragraph (2) until a period 
     of 120 days has elapsed following the date on which the 
     Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of 
     the plans of the Secretary to carry out such actions.
       (2) Actions described.--Actions described in this paragraph 
     are actions relating to harvesting technology of the medium 
     extended air defense system.
       (c) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than February 15, 2014, the 
     Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report on the opportunities to harvest 
     technology of the medium extended air defense system to 
     modernize the various air and missile defense systems and 
     integrated architecture of the Army, based on the report 
     required by section 226 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 
     1678).
       (2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
     include the following:
       (A) A review of current Army and joint requirements to 
     which any harvested technology of the medium extended air 
     defense system might be applied.
       (B) The timeline of the Secretary for completion of an 
     analysis of alternatives to technologies and systems being 
     considered for harvesting.
       (C) An overview of the planned acquisition strategy for any 
     major systems being considered for harvesting and for 
     insertion into the integrated air and missile defense 
     architecture.
       (d) Application.--The prohibition in subsection (a) may not 
     be superseded except by a provision of law that specifically 
     supersedes, repeals, or modifies such subsection.

     SEC. 232. ADDITIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE SITE IN THE UNITED 
                   STATES FOR OPTIMIZED PROTECTION OF THE 
                   HOMELAND.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama 
     have each recognized the necessity for an additional measure 
     of protection-beyond missile defense sites in Alaska and 
     California-for defending the United States against 
     intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) threats emanating 
     from the Middle East.
       (2) General Jacoby, the Commander of the United States 
     Northern Command, testified before Congress that ``we should 
     consider that Iran has a capability within the next few years 
     of flight testing ICBM capable technologies'' and that ``the 
     Iranians are intent on developing an ICBM''.
       (3) General Kehler, the Commander of the United States 
     Strategic Command, testified before Congress that ``I am 
     confident that we can defend against a limited attack from 
     Iran, although we are not in the most optimum posture to do 
     that today. . .it doesn't provide total defense today''.
       (4) General Jacoby also testified before Congress that ``I 
     would agree that a third site, wherever the decision is to 
     build a third site, would give me better weapons access, 
     increased GBI inventory and allow us the battle space to more 
     optimize our defense against future threats from Iran and 
     North Korea''.
       (5) Section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1678) 
     directs the Missile Defense Agency--
       (A) to conduct environmental impact studies for three 
     potential locations for an additional missile defense site 
     capable of protecting the homeland; and
       (B) to develop a contingency plan in case the President 
     determines to proceed with deployment of such an additional 
     site.
       (6) According the Missile Defense Agency, the cost to 
     deploy up to 20 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) at a new 
     missile defense site on the East Coast of the United States 
     is approximately $3,000,000,000 and would require 
     approximately 5 to 6 years to complete.
       (b) Additional Missile Defense Site.--
       (1) In general.--The Missile Defense Agency shall construct 
     and make operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional 
     homeland missile defense site capable of protecting the 
     homeland, designed to complement existing sites in Alaska and 
     California, to deal more effectively with the long-range 
     ballistic missile threat from the Middle East.
       (2) Requirement in addition to other required activities 
     regarding missile defense sites.--The Missile Defense Agency 
     shall carry out the requirement in paragraph (1) to construct 
     and deploy an additional homeland missile defense site 
     (including any advance procurement and engineering and design 
     in connection with such site) while continuing to meet the 
     requirement to prepare environmental impact statements and a 
     contingency plan under section 227 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 for the missile 
     defense sites described in that section.
       (3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense 
     Agency shall submit to Congress a report on the missile 
     defense site required to be constructed and deployed under 
     paragraph (1). The report shall include a description of the 
     current estimate of the funding to be required for 
     construction and deployment of the missile defense site, 
     including for advance procurement, engineering and design, 
     materials and construction, interceptor missiles, and 
     sensors.

     SEC. 233. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL OF MISSILE DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 
                   FROM EAST ASIA.

       (a) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States that--
       (1) the missile defenses of the United States provide 
     defense against multiple threats, including threats to the 
     United States, allies of the United States, and the deployed 
     forces of the United States; and
       (2) the elimination of one threat, for example the illegal 
     nuclear weapons program of a rogue state, does not eliminate 
     the reason the United States deploys missile defenses to a 
     particular region, including to defend allies of the United 
     States and deployed forces of the United States from other 
     regional threats.
       (b) Limitation.--Except as provided by subsection (c) or 
     (d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
     Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any 
     fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended to remove 
     missile defense equipment of the United States from East Asia 
     until a period of 180 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the President certifies to the congressional defense 
     committees the following:
       (1) Each country in East Asia that poses a threat to allies 
     of the United States has verifiably dismantled the nuclear 
     weapons and ballistic missile programs of such country.
       (2) The President has consulted with such allies with 
     respect to the dismantlement described in paragraph (1) 
     that--
       (A) such dismantlement has occurred; and
       (B) the missile defense platforms of the United States 
     located in East Asia are no longer needed.
       (c) Waiver.--The President may waive the limitation in 
     subsection (b) with respect to removing missile defense 
     equipment of the United States from East Asia if--
       (1) the President submits to the congressional defense 
     committees--
       (A) a certification that such waiver is in the national 
     security interest of the United States; and

[[Page 8910]]

       (B) a report, in unclassified form, explaining--
       (i) why the President cannot make a certification for such 
     removal under subsection (b);
       (ii) the national security interest covered by the 
     certification made under subparagraph (A); and
       (iii) how the President will provide a commensurate level 
     of defense for the United States, allies of the United 
     States, and deployed forces of the United States, as provided 
     by such missile defense equipment being removed; and
       (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on 
     which the President submits the information under paragraph 
     (1).
       (d) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (b) shall not 
     apply to destroyers and cruisers of the Navy equipped with 
     the Aegis ballistic missile defense system.

     SEC. 234. IMPROVEMENTS TO ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS 
                   ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM.

       (a) In General.--Section 225 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(3)(A), by inserting ``comprehensive'' 
     before ``life-cycle''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(e) Quality of Cost Estimates.--(1) The Director shall 
     ensure that each cost estimate included in an acquisition 
     baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3) includes all operation 
     and support costs, regardless of funding source, for which 
     the Director is responsible.
       ``(2) In each such baseline submitted to the congressional 
     defense committees, the Director shall state whether the 
     underlying cost estimates in such baseline meet the criteria 
     of the Comptroller General of the United States to be 
     considered a high-quality estimate. If the Director states 
     that such estimates do not meet such criteria, the Director 
     shall include in such baseline the actions, including a 
     schedule, that the Director plans to carry out for the 
     estimates to meet such criteria.''.
       (b) Report.--Not later than February 15, 2014, the Director 
     of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report of the plans and 
     schedule of the Director with respect to when the Director 
     will meet the quality and criteria of cost estimates required 
     by section 225(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added 
     by subsection (a)(2).

     SEC. 235. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SUCCESSOR TO PRECISION 
                   TRACKING SPACE SYSTEM.

       (a) Analysis of Alternatives Required.--
       (1) In general.--The Director of the Missile Defense 
     Agency, in cooperation with the Director of Cost Assessment 
     and Program Evaluation and the Defense Space Council, shall 
     perform an analysis of alternatives for a successor to the 
     precision tracking space system.
       (2) Consideration.--The Director shall ensure that the 
     analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1) considers the 
     following:
       (A) Current and future terrestrial, airborne, and space 
     capabilities and capability gaps for missile defense sensing 
     requirements.
       (B) Current and planned overhead persistent infrared 
     architecture and the potential for the future exploitability 
     of such architecture.
       (C) Lessons learned from the space tracking and 
     surveillance system and precision tracking space system 
     technology development programs.
       (D) Opinions of private industry based on the experience of 
     such industry with delivering space capabilities.
       (E) Opportunities for such successor system to contribute 
     to nonmissile defense missions with unmet requirements, 
     including space situational awareness.
       (3) Role of other departments.--In conducting the analysis 
     of alternatives under paragraph (1), the Director shall 
     compare the advantages and disadvantages, including in terms 
     of costs, with respect to the Director--
       (A) developing a successor to the precision tracking space 
     system solely for the Missile Defense Agency; and
       (B) cooperating with other heads of departments and 
     agencies of the United States to develop space systems that 
     are multi-mission, including by hosting payloads.
       (b) Submission Required.--
       (1) Terms of reference.--Not later than 60 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees the terms of 
     reference of the analysis of alternatives performed under 
     subsection (a)(1).
       (2) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report including--
       (A) the analysis of alternatives for a successor to the 
     precision tracking space system performed under subsection 
     (a)(1); and
       (B) a description of the potential platforms on which a 
     hosted payload could be hosted.
       (3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (2) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.
       (c) Conforming Repeal.--Section 224 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1675) is repealed.

     SEC. 236. PLAN TO IMPROVE ORGANIC KILL ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY 
                   OF THE GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM.

       (a) Organic Kill Assessment Capability.--The Director of 
     the Missile Defense Agency and the Commander of the United 
     States Northern Command, in consultation with the Commander 
     of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly 
     develop--
       (1) options to achieve an organic kill assessment 
     capability for the ground-based midcourse defense system that 
     can be developed by not later than December 31, 2019, 
     including by improving the command, control, battle 
     management, and communications program and the sensor and 
     communications architecture of the Agency; and
       (2) a plan to carry out such options that gives priority to 
     including such capabilities in at least some of the 14 
     ground-based interceptors that will be procured by the 
     Director, as announced by the Secretary of Defense on March 
     15, 2013.
       (b) Improved Hit Assessment.--The Director and the 
     Commander of the United States Northern Command, in 
     consultation with the Commander of the United States 
     Strategic Command, shall jointly develop an interim 
     capability for improved hit assessment for the ground-based 
     midcourse defense system that can be integrated into near-
     term enhanced kill vehicle upgrades and refurbishment.
       (c) Submission to Congress.--Not later than March 15, 2014, 
     the Director and the Commander of the United States Northern 
     Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report on--
       (1) the development of an organic kill assessment 
     capability under subsection (a), including the plan developed 
     under paragraph (2) of such subsection; and
       (2) the development of an interim capability for improved 
     hit assessment under subsection (b).

     SEC. 237. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR IRON DOME SHORT-RANGE 
                   ROCKET DEFENSE PROGRAM.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
     2014 by section 201 for research, development, test, and 
     evaluation, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile 
     Defense Agency, $15,000,000 may be obligated or expended for 
     enhancing the capability for producing the Iron Dome short-
     range rocket defense program in the United States, including 
     for infrastructure, tooling, transferring data, special test 
     equipment, and related components.

     SEC. 238. NATO AND THE PHASED, ADAPTIVE APPROACH TO MISSILE 
                   DEFENSE IN EUROPE.

       (a) NATO Funding.--
       (1) Phase i of epaa.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the President shall consult 
     with the North Atlantic Council and the Secretary General of 
     the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section 
     referred to as ``NATO'') on--
       (A) the funding of the phased, adaptive approach to missile 
     defense in Europe; and
       (B) establishing a plan for NATO to provide at least 50 
     percent of the infrastructure and operations and maintenance 
     costs of phase I of the phased, adaptive approach to missile 
     defense in Europe.
       (2) Phases ii and iii of epaa.--The President shall use the 
     NATO Military Common-Funded Resources process to seek to fund 
     at least 50 percent of the costs for phases II and III of the 
     phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.
       (3) Reports.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, and each 180-day period thereafter, 
     the President shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of 
     the Senate a report on the funding provided by NATO pursuant 
     to paragraphs (1) and (2).
       (b) Interceptors.--If the Secretary of Defense determines 
     that it is useful to the interests of the United States, the 
     Secretary shall seek to engage with members of NATO to 
     establish a NATO common pool of Aegis standard missile-3 
     block IA, standard missile-3 block IB, and standard missile-3 
     block IIA interceptors to defend NATO members through the 
     phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.

     SEC. 239. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT OF CAPABILITY 
                   ENHANCEMENT II EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE.

       It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 
     should not procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric 
     kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a 
     successful operational flight test of the Capability 
     Enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred unless 
     such procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm 
     line for the industrial base.

     SEC. 240. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE 
                   STRATEGIC DEFENSE INITIATIVE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) President Ronald Reagan in March 1983, in a speech from 
     the oval office, laid the corner stone for a long-term 
     research and development program to begin to achieve our 
     ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic 
     nuclear missiles.
       (2) President Reagan stated, ``I've become more and more 
     deeply convinced that the human spirit must be capable of 
     rising above dealing with other nations and human beings by 
     threatening their existence. . . What if free people could 
     live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest 
     upon the threat of instant U.S. retaliation to deter a Soviet 
     attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic 
     ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that 
     of our allies?''.
       (3) The Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as ``Star 
     Wars'', challenged the nation to accomplish the impossible by 
     moving beyond the obvious possibilities of the day to set the 
     United States and our allies up for success.
       (4) In 1999, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization 
     (BMDO), National Missile Defense

[[Page 8911]]

     (NMD) prototype interceptor successfully demonstrated ``hit-
     to-kill'' technology intercepting a modified Minuteman 
     intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM).
       (5) Congress passed the National Missile Defense Act of 
     1999 (Public Law 106-38) (signed by President Clinton), which 
     stated, ``It is the policy of the United States to deploy, as 
     soon as is technologically possible, an effective National 
     Missile Defense system capable of defending the territory of 
     the United States against limited ballistic missile attack 
     (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate)''.
       (6) On December 13, 2001, President George W. Bush 
     announced ``I have concluded the ABM treaty hinders our 
     government's ability to develop ways to protect our people 
     from future terrorist or rogue state missile attacks''.
       (7) Russian President Vladimir Putin said the move was 
     ``not a threat to the security of the Russian Federation''.
       (8) Since 2001, the United States has deployed considerable 
     Missile Defense capability: 30 ground-based interceptors 
     defending the continental U.S. today; 32 Aegis BMD ships; 113 
     SM-3 IA interceptors; 25 SM-3 IB interceptors; 3 THAAD 
     batteries and 89 interceptors; and 8 AN/TPY-2 forward-based 
     sensors.
       (9) The United States has partnerships with 22 nations, and 
     the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), for missile 
     defense cooperation. Likewise, India and South Korea are 
     developing missile defenses and the Russian Federation and 
     People's Republic of China are also developing and improving 
     missile defenses.
       (10) Since 2001 when they began development, United States 
     missile defenses have had a test record of 58 of 73 hit-to-
     kill intercept attempts and have been successful across all 
     programs of the integrated system, including Aegis Ballistic 
     Missile Defense (BMD), Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD), 
     Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), and PATRIOT 
     Advanced Capability-3.
       (11) In July of 2004, the United States missile defense 
     system was declared operational with limited capability. 
     Since that time, it has offered defense against limited 
     threats to the continental United States.
       (12) The United States has cooperatively developed with our 
     Israeli allies a number of missile defense systems including 
     Arrow, Arrow 3 and David's Sling, systems which will 
     protector our Israeli allies and contribute technology and 
     expertise to U.S. systems.
       (13) The United States in support of NATO deployed a 
     Patriot missile battery to defend the population and 
     territory of Turkey and provide material support for Article 
     V of the North Atlantic Treaty in the event of spillover from 
     the Syrian civil war and has deployed Phase I of the European 
     Phased Adaptive Approach, which includes a transportable x-
     band radar array and an on-station AEGIS ballistic missile 
     defense ship armed with Standard Missile 3 block IA missile 
     interceptors.
       (14) When United States territory, deployed forces and 
     allies were threatened by North Korean ballistic missiles the 
     United States had the operational capability and national 
     will to deploy THAAD units to Guam to provide a defensive 
     shield.
       (15) The United States continues to work jointly with Japan 
     to improve the Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) 
     which in addition to providing missile defense in the Pacific 
     is also a keystone in the Phased Adaptive Approach for 
     European missile defense.
       (16) On-going research and development under the auspices 
     of the Missile Defense Agency will continue to expand the 
     technology envelope to deploy a layered missile defense 
     system capable of defending the homeland, our military forces 
     deployed overseas, friendly nations and our allies against 
     all ballistic missiles from launch and orbit to reentry.
       (17) A credible ballistic missile defense system is 
     critical to the national defense of the United States.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
       (1) recognizes the inspiring leadership of President Ronald 
     Reagan to ``maintain the peace through strength'';
       (2) recognizes the enduring obligation President as 
     Commander in Chief to`` preserve, protect, and defend the 
     Constitution'';
       (3) commemorates the vision of President Reagan on the 30th 
     anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative;
       (4) believes that it is imperative that the United States 
     continue fielding a robust missile defense system, including 
     additional ground based interceptors; and
       (5) commits to supporting continued investments in future 
     missile defense capabilities and emerging technologies such 
     as directed energy and railguns.

                          Subtitle D--Reports

     SEC. 251. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE AMPHIBIOUS 
                   COMBAT VEHICLE ACQUISITION PROGRAM.

       (a) Annual GAO Review.--During the period beginning on the 
     date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 
     2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 
     conduct an annual review of the amphibious combat vehicle 
     acquisition program.
       (b) Annual Reports.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than March 1 of each year 
     beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     on the review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition 
     program conducted under subsection (a).
       (2) Matters to be included.--Each report under paragraph 
     (1) shall include the following:
       (A) The extent to which the program is meeting development 
     and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and risk 
     mitigation goals.
       (B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational 
     capability and full operational capability dates for the 
     amphibious combat vehicle, the progress and results of--
       (i) developmental and operational testing of the vehicle; 
     and
       (ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in vehicle 
     performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, 
     suitability, and safety.
       (C) An assessment of procurement plans, production results, 
     and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier 
     performance.
       (D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the 
     amphibious combat vehicle, including whether such strategy is 
     in compliance with acquisition management best-practices and 
     the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of 
     Defense.
       (E) An assessment of the projected operations and support 
     costs and the viability of the Marine Corps to afford to 
     operate and sustain the amphibious combat vehicle.
       (3) Additional information.--In submitting to the 
     congressional defense committees the first report under 
     paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the 
     Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the 
     amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program, the 
     Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such 
     program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity 
     of--
       (A) the analysis of alternatives;
       (B) the initial capabilities document; and
       (C) the capabilities development document.

     SEC. 252. REPORT ON STRATEGY TO IMPROVE BODY ARMOR.

       (a) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a report on the 
     comprehensive research and development strategy of the 
     Secretary to achieve significant reductions in the weight of 
     body armor.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) A brief description of each solution for body armor 
     weight reduction that is being developed as of the date of 
     the report.
       (2) For each such solution--
       (A) the costs, schedules, and performance requirements;
       (B) the research and development funding profile;
       (C) a description of the materials being used in the 
     solution; and
       (D) the feasibility and technology readiness levels of the 
     solution and the materials.
       (3) A strategy to provide resources for future research and 
     development of body armor weight reduction.
       (4) An explanation of how the Secretary is using a modular 
     or tailorable solution to approach body armor weight 
     reduction.
       (5) A description of how the Secretary coordinates the 
     research and development of body armor weight reduction being 
     carried out by the military departments.
       (6) Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate.

     SEC. 253. REPORT ON MAIN BATTLE TANK FUEL EFFICIENCY 
                   INITIATIVE.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the investment 
     strategy to accelerate fuel efficiency improvements to the 
     current engine and transmission of the M1 Abrams series main 
     battle tank as part of the Army's Engineering Change Proposal 
     Phase I strategy.

     SEC. 254. REPORT ON POWERED RAIL SYSTEM.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
     the powered rail system compared to currently fielded 
     solutions. Such report shall include each of the following:
       (1) Verification of relevant studies previously conducted 
     by the Army, including that of the Maneuver Center of 
     Excellence, which show that a typical infantry platoon 
     requires approximately 430 pounds of batteries for a 72-hour 
     mission, or roughly 10 pounds per soldier, and that the per-
     soldier, per-year procurement, storage, transport and 
     disposal costs of these batteries are between $50,000 and 
     $65,000.
       (2) An assessment of the comparative total cost of 
     ownership, including procurement, fielding, training, and 
     sustainment of the existing rail system and associated rail-
     mounted devices with respect to battery types and usage, when 
     compared to that of a powered rail or intelligent rail system 
     with a consolidated power source.
       (3) An assessment of the specific effects of excessive 
     battery weight on soldier mobility, endurance and lethality 
     determined through side-by-side time, endurance, motion and 
     lethality tests between soldiers operating with existing 
     rail-mounted weapon accessories and soldiers using the 
     powered rail or intelligent rail solution.
       (4) An assessment of the advantages to the Army of 
     incorporating the high-speed communications capability 
     embedded in the powered rail or intelligent rail technology, 
     including the integration of existing Army devices and 
     devices in development such as the family of weapons sights 
     and the enhanced night vision goggles, with the powered rail 
     technology, and the connection of these previously 
     unconnected devices to the soldier network.
       (b) Testing.--Any testing conducted in order to produce the 
     report required by subsection (a)

[[Page 8912]]

     shall be supervised and validated by the Director of 
     Operational Test and Evaluation of the Department of Defense.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

     SEC. 261. ESTABLISHMENT OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODERNIZATION REVIEW 
                   AND ADVISORY BOARD.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory 
       Board

       ``(a) Establishment.--There shall be in the Department of 
     Defense a Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory 
     Board (in this section referred to as the `Board') to review 
     and assess the cryptographic modernization activities of the 
     Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect 
     to such activities pursuant to the roles and responsibilities 
     outlined in the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
     Instruction 6510.02D.
       ``(b) Members.--(1) The Secretary shall determine the 
     number of members of the Board.
       ``(2) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of 
     general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department 
     of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as 
     members of the Board.
       ``(c) Responsibilities.--The Board shall--
       ``(1) review compliance with cease-use dates for specific 
     cryptographic systems based on rigorous analysis of technical 
     and threat factors and issue guidance, as needed, to relevant 
     program executive offices and program managers;
       ``(2) monitor the overall cryptographic modernization 
     efforts of the Department, including while such efforts are 
     being executed;
       ``(3) convene in-depth technical program reviews, as 
     needed, for specific cryptographic modernization developments 
     with respect to validating current and in-draft requirements 
     of systems of the Department of Defense and identifying 
     programmatic risks;
       ``(4) develop a five-year cryptographic modernization plan 
     to--
       ``(A) make recommendations to the Joint Requirements 
     Oversight Council with respect to updating or modifying 
     requirements for cryptographic modernization; and
       ``(B) identify previously unidentified requirements;
       ``(5) develop a long-term roadmap to--
       ``(A) ensure synchronization with major planning documents;
       ``(B) anticipate risks and issues in 10- and 20-year 
     timelines; and
       ``(C) ensure that the expertise and insights of the 
     military departments, Defense Agencies, the combatant 
     commands, industry, academia, and key allies are included in 
     the course of developing and carrying out cryptographic 
     modernization activities;
       ``(6) develop a concept of operations for how cryptographic 
     systems should function in a system-of-systems environment; 
     and
       ``(7) advise the Secretary on the development of a 
     cryptographic asset visibility system.
       ``(d) Exclusion of Certain Programs.--The Board shall not 
     include programs funded under the National Intelligence 
     Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security 
     Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this 
     section.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item 
     relating to section 188 the following new item:

``189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board.''.

     SEC. 262. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF A STATE TO 
                   PARTICIPATE IN DEFENSE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM TO 
                   STIMULATE COMPETITIVE RESEARCH.

       Subparagraph (A) of section 257(d)(2) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 
     103-337; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(A) the State is eligible for the experimental program to 
     stimulate competitive research under section 113 of the 
     National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988 (42 
     U.S.C. 1862g); and''.

     SEC. 263. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE 
                   FUNDS FOR DEFENSE LABORATORIES FOR RESEARCH AND 
                   DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR MILITARY 
                   MISSIONS.

       (a) Clarification of Availability of Funds.--Section 219 of 
     the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
     (c) and (d), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsection (b):
       ``(b) Availability of Funds for Infrastructure 
     Revitalization Projects.--
       ``(1) In general.--Subject to the provisions of this 
     subsection, funds available under a mechanism under 
     subsection (a) for specific laboratory infrastructure 
     revitalization projects shall be available for such projects 
     until expended.
       ``(2) Prior notice of costs of projects.--Funds shall be 
     available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project 
     referred to in that paragraph only if the congressional 
     defense committees are notified of the total cost of the 
     project before the commencement of the project.
       ``(3) Accumulation of funds for projects.--Funds may 
     accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a 
     project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than five 
     years.
       ``(4) Limitation on total cost of project.--Funds shall be 
     available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project 
     referred to in that paragraph only if the cost of the project 
     does not exceed $4,000,000.''.
       (b) Extension.--Subsection (d) of such section, as 
     redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of this section, is amended 
     by striking ``September 30, 2016'' and inserting ``September 
     30, 2020''.
       (c) Application.--Subsection (b) of section 219 of the 
     Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as added by subsection 
     (a)(2), shall apply with respect to funds made available 
     under such section 219 after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act.

     SEC. 264. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD PRIZES FOR ADVANCED 
                   TECHNOLOGY ACHIEVEMENTS.

       Section 2374a(f) of chapter 139 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by striking ``September 30, 2013'' and 
     inserting ``September 30, 2018''.

     SEC. 265. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE 
                   TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION FEATURES DURING RESEARCH 
                   AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN DEFENSE SYSTEMS.

        Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking ``October 1, 
     2015'' and inserting ``October 1, 2020''.

     SEC. 266. BRIEFING ON POWER AND ENERGY RESEARCH CONDUCTED AT 
                   UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED RESEARCH CENTERS.

       (a) Briefing.--Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of 
     the Senate and the House of Representatives on power and 
     energy research conducted at the university affiliated 
     research centers.
       (b) Matters Included.--The briefing under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) A description of current and planned research on power 
     grid issues conducted with other university-based energy 
     centers.
       (2) A description of current and planned collaboration 
     efforts regarding power grid issues with university-based 
     research centers that have an expertise in energy efficiency 
     and renewable energy, including efforts with respect to--
       (A) system failure and losses, including--
       (i) utility logistics and supply chain management for 
     events resulting in system failure or other major damage;
       (ii) near real-time utility and law enforcement access to 
     damage assessment information during events resulting in 
     system failure or other major damage;
       (B) mitigation and response to disasters and attacks;
       (C) variable energy resource integration on the bulk power 
     system;
       (D) integration of high penetrations of distributed energy 
     technologies on the electric distribution system;
       (E) substation and asset hardening techniques appropriate 
     for use in civilian areas;
       (F) facilitating development of training programs to 
     support significant increase in required technical skills of 
     present and future utility field forces, including hands-on 
     training; and
       (G) facilitating increased consumer self-sufficiency.

                  TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and 
     maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 
     4301.

                   Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

     SEC. 311. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ON PROPOSED 
                   BUDGETS FOR ACTIVITIES RELATING TO OPERATIONAL 
                   ENERGY STRATEGY.

       Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``Not later than 30 days 
     after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is 
     submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, 
     the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on 
     the proposed budgets for that fiscal year'' and inserting 
     ``The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report 
     on the proposed budgets for a fiscal year''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal 
     year shall be submitted by the later of the following dates:
       ``(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the 
     budget for that fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant 
     to section 1105 of title 31.
       ``(B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year.''.

     SEC. 312. FACILITATION OF INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN 
                   CONSERVATION PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF 
                   DEFENSE, AGRICULTURE, AND INTERIOR TO AVOID OR 
                   REDUCE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS 
                   ACTIVITIES.

       (a) Use of Funds Under Certain Agreements.--Section 2684a 
     of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections 
     (i) and (j); and

[[Page 8913]]

       (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new 
     subsection (h):
       ``(h) Interagency Cooperation in Conservation Programs To 
     Avoid or Reduce Adverse Impacts on Military Readiness 
     Activities.--In order to facilitate interagency cooperation 
     and enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect 
     both the environment and military readiness, the recipient of 
     funds provided pursuant an agreement under this section or 
     under the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to 
     the lands and waters within the scope of the agreement, use 
     such funds to satisfy any matching funds or cost-sharing 
     requirement of any conservation program of the Department of 
     Agriculture or the Department of the Interior notwithstanding 
     any limitation of such program on the source of matching or 
     cost-sharing funds.''.
       (b) Sunset.--This section and subsection (h) of section 
     2684a of title 10, United States Code, as added by this 
     section, shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any 
     agreement referred to in such subsection that is entered into 
     on or before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to 
     its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.

     SEC. 313. REAUTHORIZATION OF SIKES ACT.

       Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended by 
     striking ``fiscal years 2009 through 2014'' each place it 
     appears and inserting ``fiscal years 2014 through 2019''.

     SEC. 314. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS UNDER SIKES ACT FOR LAND 
                   MANAGEMENT RELATED TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   READINESS ACTIVITIES.

       (a) Multiyear Agreements To Fund Long-Term Management.--
     Subsection (b) of section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 
     670c-1) is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Funds''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) In the case of a cooperative agreement under 
     subsection (a)(2), funds referred to in paragraph (1)--
       ``(A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount 
     intended to cover the future costs of the natural resource 
     maintenance and improvement activities provided for under the 
     agreement; and
       ``(B) may be invested by the recipient in accordance with 
     the recipient's own guidelines for the management and 
     investment of financial assets, and any interest or income 
     derived from such investment may be applied for the same 
     purposes as the principal.''.
       (b) Availability of Funds and Relation to Other Laws.--
     Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:
       ``(c) Availability of Funds and Relation to Other Laws.--
     (1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered 
     into under this section shall be subject to the availability 
     of funds.
       ``(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States 
     Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used 
     to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use 
     of the United States Government.
       ``(3) Amounts available to the Department of Defense that 
     are provided to any Federal, State, local, or nongovernmental 
     entity for conservation and rehabilitation of natural 
     resources in an area that is not on a military installation--
       ``(A) may only be used for payment of direct costs 
     associated with the management of such area; and
       ``(B) may be used to pay not more than 3 percent of total 
     project administrative costs, fees, and management charges.
       ``(4) Amounts available to the Department of Defense may 
     not be used under this Act to acquire fee title interest in 
     real property for natural resources projects that are not on 
     a military installation.''.
       (c) Annual Audits.--Such section is further amended by 
     adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(d) Annual Audits.--The Inspector General of the 
     Department of Defense shall annually audit each natural 
     resources project funded with amounts available to the 
     Department of Defense under this Act that is not on a 
     military installation.''.
       (d) Sunset.--This section and the provisions of law enacted 
     by the amendments made by this section shall expire on 
     October 1, 2019, except that any cooperative agreement 
     referred to in such provisions that is entered into on or 
     before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its 
     terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.

     SEC. 315. EXCLUSIONS FROM DEFINITION OF ``CHEMICAL 
                   SUBSTANCE'' UNDER TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT.

       Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 
     U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking ``, and'' and 
     inserting ``and any component of such an article (including, 
     without limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles, 
     propellants when manufactured for or used in such an article, 
     and primers), and''.

     SEC. 316. EXEMPTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FROM ALTERNATIVE 
                   FUEL PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENT.

        Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 
     2007 (Public Law 110-140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following: ``This section shall not 
     apply to the Department of Defense.''.

     SEC. 317. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF WASTE 
                   IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS.

       For the purposes of Department of Defense Instruction 
     4715.19, issued as required by section 317 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
     111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) or any successor instruction, 
     the term ``covered waste'' specifically includes, in addition 
     to the materials already specified in subparagraphs (A) and 
     (B) of subsection (c)(2) of such section, the following:
       (1) Tires.
       (2) Treated wood.
       (3) Batteries.
       (4) Plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic 
     remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover 
     plastic materials from the solid waste stream.
       (5) Munitions and explosives, the destruction of which is 
     covered in Department of Defense Instruction 6055.09-M 
     (Reference (i)).
       (6) Compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with valves 
     removed.
       (7) Fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its 
     contents.
       (8) Aerosol cans.
       (9) Polychlorinated biphenyls.
       (10) Petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other than 
     waste fuel for initial combustion).
       (11) Asbestos.
       (12) Mercury.
       (13) Foam tent material.
       (14) Any item containing any of the materials referred to 
     in a preceding paragraph.

     SEC. 318. LIMITATION ON PLAN, DESIGN, REFURBISHING, OR 
                   CONSTRUCTION OF BIOFUELS REFINERIES.

       Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary 
     of Defense may not enter into a contract for the planning, 
     design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery 
     any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels 
     unless such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction 
     is specifically authorized by law.

     SEC. 319. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF BIOFUELS.

       (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), none 
     of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be 
     used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the 
     following dates:
       (1) The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to 
     the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department.
       (2) The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011 
     (Public Law 112-25), and the sequestration in effect by 
     reason of such Act, are no longer in effect.
       (b) Exceptions.--The limitation under subsection (a) shall 
     not apply to biofuels purchased--
       (1) in limited quantities necessary to complete test and 
     certification; or
       (2) for the biofuel research and development efforts of the 
     Department.

                 Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

     SEC. 321. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP STRATEGIC SUSTAINMENT PLAN.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees and to the 
     Comptroller General of the United States a strategic 
     sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan 
     shall include each of the following:
       (1) An estimate of the cost and schedule of implementing 
     the plan.
       (2) An identification of the requirements and planning for 
     the long-term sustainment of the Littoral Combat Ship and its 
     mission modules in accordance with section 2366b of title 10, 
     United States Code, as amended by section 801 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81; 125 Stat. 1482).
       (3) A description of the current and future operating 
     environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified or 
     referred to in strategic guidance and planning documents of 
     the Department of Defense.
       (4) The facility, supply, and logistics systems 
     requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship when forward 
     deployed, and an estimate of the cost and personnel required 
     to conduct the necessary maintenance activities.
       (5) Any required updates to host-nation agreements to 
     facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of 
     the Littoral Combat Ship, including a discussion of overseas 
     management of Ship ordnance and hazardous materials and 
     delivery of equipment and spare parts needed for emergent 
     repair.
       (6) An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance 
     requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule of 
     pier-side maintenance timelines when forward-deployed, 
     including requirements for multiple ships and variants.
       (7) An assessment of the total quantity of equipment, spare 
     parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel, and size of 
     fly away teams required to support forward-deployed 
     maintenance requirements for the U.S.S. Freedom while in 
     Singapore, and estimates for follow-on deployments of 
     Littoral Combat Ships of both variants.
       (8) A detailed description of the continuity of operations 
     plans for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron and of any plans 
     to increase the number of Squadron personnel.
       (9) An identification of mission critical single point of 
     failure equipment for which a sufficient number spare parts 
     are necessary to have on hand, and determination of Littoral 
     Combat Ship forward deployed equipment and spare parts 
     locations and levels.
       (b) Form.--The plan required under subsection (a) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified 
     annex.

     SEC. 322. REVIEW OF CRITICAL MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES 
                   WITHIN ARMY ARSENALS.

       (a) Review.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 
     the Secretaries of the military

[[Page 8914]]

     departments and the directors of the Defense Agencies, shall 
     conduct a review of the current and expected manufacturing 
     requirements across the Department of Defense to identify 
     critical manufacturing competencies, supplies, components, 
     end items, parts, assemblies, and sub-assemblies for which no 
     or a limited domestic commercial source exists. In conducting 
     the review under this section, the Secretary--
       (1) shall assess which of the competencies for which no or 
     a limited domestic commercial source exists could be executed 
     by an arsenal owned by the United States; and
       (2) may review other manufacturing capabilities, as the 
     Secretary determines appropriate, to determine if such 
     capabilities could be executed by an arsenal owned by the 
     United States.
       (b) Congressional Briefing.--Not later than 180 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     brief the congressional defense committees on the results of 
     the review conducted under subsection (a).

     SEC. 323. INCLUSION OF ARMY ARSENALS CAPABILITIES IN 
                   SOLICITATIONS.

       (a) Determination of Use of Arsenals.--
       (1) Solicitation of information.--When undertaking a make-
     or-buy analysis, a Program Executive Officer or Program 
     Manager of a military service or Defense Agency shall solicit 
     information from an arsenal owned by the United States 
     regarding the capability of the arsenal to fulfill a 
     manufacturing requirement.
       (2) Submittal of material solution.--Upon a determination, 
     that an arsenal owned by the United States is capable of 
     fulfilling a manufacturing requirement, a Program Executive 
     Officer or Program Manager shall allow the arsenal to submit 
     a material solution in response to the requirement.
       (b) Notification of Solicitations.--When issuing a 
     solicitation, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager 
     shall notify each arsenal owned by the United States of any 
     manufacturing requirement that the arsenal has the capability 
     to fulfill and allow the arsenal to submit a proposal in 
     response to the requirement.

                          Subtitle D--Reports

     SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 
                   PERSONNEL AND UNIT READINESS.

       (a) Assessment of Assigned Missions and Contractor 
     Support.--Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (j); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new 
     subsections:
       ``(g) Combatant Command Assigned Mission Assessments.--(1) 
     Each report shall also include an assessment by each 
     commander of a geographic or functional combatant command of 
     the ability of the command to successfully execute each of 
     the assigned missions of the command. Each such assessment 
     for a combatant command shall also include a list of the 
     mission essential tasks for each assigned mission of the 
     command and an assessment of the ability of the command to 
     successfully complete each task within prescribed timeframes.
       ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `assigned 
     mission' means any contingency response program plan, theater 
     campaign plan, or named operation that is approved and 
     assigned by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
       ``(h) Risk Assessment of Dependence on Contractor 
     Support.--Each report shall also include an assessment by the 
     Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk 
     incurred by using contract support in contingency operations 
     as required under Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22, 
     `Policies and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix'.
       ``(i) Combat Support Agencies Assessment.--(1) Each report 
     shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense 
     of the military readiness of the combat support agencies, 
     including, for each such agency--
       ``(A) a determination with respect to the responsiveness 
     and readiness of the agency to support operating forces in 
     the event of a war or threat to national security, 
     including--
       ``(i) a list of mission essential tasks and an assessment 
     of the ability of the agency to successfully perform those 
     tasks;
       ``(ii) an assessment of how the ability of the agency to 
     accomplish the tasks referred to in subparagraph (A) affects 
     the ability of the military departments and the unified and 
     geographic combatant commands to execute operations and 
     contingency plans by number;
       ``(iii) any readiness deficiencies and actions recommended 
     to address such deficiencies; and
       ``(iv) key indicators and other relevant information 
     related to any deficiency or other problem identified;
       ``(B) any recommendations that the Secretary considers 
     appropriate.
       ``(2) In this subsection, the term `combat support agency' 
     means any of the following Defense Agencies:
       ``(A) The Defense Information Systems Agency.
       ``(B) The Defense Intelligence Agency.
       ``(C) The Defense Logistics Agency.
       ``(D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (but only 
     with respect to combat support functions that the agencies 
     perform for the Department of Defense).
       ``(E) The Defense Contract Management Agency.
       ``(F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
       ``(G) The National Reconnaissance Office.
       ``(H) The National Security Agency (but only with respect 
     to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the 
     Department of Defense) and Central Security Service.
       ``(I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat 
     support agency by the Secretary of Defense.''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Such section is further amended 
     in subsection (a), by striking ``and (f)'' and inserting 
     ``(f), (g), (h), and (i)''.

     SEC. 332. REPEAL OF ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON ARMY 
                   PROGRESS.

       Section 323 of the John Warner National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 
     120 Stat. 2146; 10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (d);
       (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
     (d) and (e), respectively; and
       (3) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``or 
     (d)''.

     SEC. 333. REVISION TO REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL SUBMISSION OF 
                   INFORMATION REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
                   CAPITAL ASSETS.

       Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314; 
     10 U.S.C. 221 note) is amended by striking ``in excess of 
     $30,000,000'' and all that follows and inserting ``(as 
     computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of 
     $32,000,000 or an estimated total cost for the future-years 
     defense program for which the budget is submitted (as 
     computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of 
     $378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments, 
     regardless of the appropriation and fund source, directly 
     related to the assets definition, design, development, 
     deployment, sustainment, and disposal.''.

          Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

     SEC. 341. LIMITATION ON REDUCTION OF FORCE STRUCTURE AT LAJES 
                   AIR FORCE BASE, AZORES.

       The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force 
     structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, relative to the 
     force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013, 
     until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense concludes the 
     European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by 
     the Secretary on January 25, 2013, and briefs the 
     congressional defense committees regarding such Assessment. 
     Such briefing shall include a specific assessment of the 
     efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in supporting the 
     United Stated overseas force posture.

     SEC. 342. PROHIBITION ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAMS OUTSIDE THE UNITED 
                   STATES.

       (a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated or otherwise available to the Secretary of 
     Defense for fiscal year 2014 or 2015 may be used for the 
     performance of flight demonstration teams under the 
     jurisdiction of the Secretary at any location outside the 
     United States.
       (b) United States.--In this section, the term ``United 
     States'' means the several States of the United States, the 
     District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and 
     possessions of the United States.

                       Subtitle F--Other Matters

     SEC. 351. REQUIREMENT TO ESTABLISH POLICY ON JOINT COMBAT 
                   UNIFORMS.

       (a) Establishment of Policy.--It is the policy of the 
     United States that by not later than October 1, 2018, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall require all military services to 
     use a joint combat camouflage uniform, including color and 
     pattern variants designed for specific combat environments.
       (b) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (c), 
     each military service shall be prohibited from adopting a new 
     combat camouflage uniform, unless--
       (1) the combat camouflage utility uniform will be a joint 
     uniform adopted by all military services; or
       (2) the military services adopt a uniform currently in use 
     by another military service.
       (c) Exceptions.--Nothing in subsection (b) shall be 
     construed as--
       (1) prohibiting the development or fielding of combat and 
     camouflage utility uniforms for use by personnel assigned to 
     or operating in support of the unified combatant command for 
     special operations forces described in section 167 of title 
     10, United States Code;
       (2) prohibiting the military services from fielding 
     ancillary uniform items, including headwear, footwear, or 
     other such items as determined by the Secretaries of the 
     military departments; or
       (3) prohibiting the military services from issuing working 
     or vehicle crew uniforms.
       (d) Guidance Required.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall issue guidance to implement this section. At a minimum, 
     such guidance shall--
       (1) require the Secretaries of the military departments to 
     collaborate on the development of joint criteria for the 
     design, development, fielding, and characteristics of combat 
     camouflage uniforms;
       (2) require the Secretaries of the military departments to 
     ensure that new combat and camouflage utility uniforms meet 
     the geographic and operational requirements of the commanders 
     of the combatant commands; and
       (3) require the Secretaries of the military departments to 
     ensure that all new combat and camouflage utility uniforms 
     achieve interoperability with other components of individual 
     war fighter systems, including organizational clothing and 
     individual equipment such as body armor and other individual 
     protective systems.
       (e) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
     prohibition in subsection (b) if the

[[Page 8915]]

     Secretary certifies to Congress that there are exceptional 
     operational circumstances that require the development or 
     fielding of a new combat camouflage uniform.
       (f) Repeal of Policy.--Section 352 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84, 
     123 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note prec.) is hereby repealed.

              TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

                       Subtitle A--Active Forces

     SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES.

       The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty 
     personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows:
       (1) The Army, 520,000.
       (2) The Navy, 323,600.
       (3) The Marine Corps, 190,200.
       (4) The Air Force, 327,600.

     SEC. 402. REVISION IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH 
                   MINIMUM LEVELS.

       Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the 
     following new paragraphs:
       ``(1) For the Army, 520,000.
       ``(2) For the Navy, 323,600.
       ``(3) For the Marine Corps, 190,200.
       ``(4) For the Air Force, 327,600.''.

                       Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

     SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE.

       (a) In General.--The Armed Forces are authorized strengths 
     for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as 
     of September 30, 2014, as follows:
       (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200.
       (2) The Army Reserve, 205,000.
       (3) The Navy Reserve, 59,100.
       (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600.
       (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400.
       (6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,400.
       (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000.
       (b) End Strength Reductions.--The end strengths prescribed 
     by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve 
     component shall be proportionately reduced by--
       (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to 
     serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component 
     which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end 
     of the fiscal year; and
       (2) the total number of individual members not in units 
     organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such 
     component who are on active duty (other than for training or 
     for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their 
     consent at the end of the fiscal year.
       (c) End Strength Increases.--Whenever units or individual 
     members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are 
     released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end 
     strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected 
     Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased 
     proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such 
     units and by the total number of such individual members.

     SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN 
                   SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES.

       Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the 
     reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of 
     September 30, 2014, the following number of Reserves to be 
     serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the 
     case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of 
     organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or 
     training the reserve components:
       (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060.
       (2) The Army Reserve, 16,261.
       (3) The Navy Reserve, 10,159.
       (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
       (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734.
       (6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,911.

     SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL 
                   STATUS).

       The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as 
     of the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve 
     components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding 
     section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the 
     following:
       (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 
     27,210.
       (2) For the Army Reserve, 8,395.
       (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 
     21,875.
       (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429.

     SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2014 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL 
                   STATUS TECHNICIANS.

       (a) Limitations.--
       (1) National guard.--Within the limitation provided in 
     section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the 
     number of non-dual status technicians employed by the 
     National Guard as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the 
     following:
       (A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 
     1,600.
       (B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
       (2) Army reserve.--The number of non-dual status 
     technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 
     2014, may not exceed 595.
       (3) Air force reserve.--The number of non-dual status 
     technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 
     30, 2014, may not exceed 90.
       (b) Non-dual Status Technicians Defined.--In this section, 
     the term ``non-dual status technician'' has the meaning given 
     that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States 
     Code.

     SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO 
                   BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT.

       During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members of 
     the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving 
     at any time on full-time operational support duty under 
     section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the 
     following:
       (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
       (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000.
       (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
       (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
       (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
       (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.

              Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of 
     the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 
     provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4401.
       (b) Construction of Authorization.--The authorization of 
     appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other 
     authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for 
     such purpose for fiscal year 2014.

                   TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

             Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

     SEC. 501. LIMITATIONS ON NUMBER OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS 
                   ON ACTIVE DUTY.

       (a) Per-service Limitations; Limited Joint Duty 
     Exclusions.--Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, as 
     amended by section 502 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1387) 
     and section 501(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1714), is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``231'' and inserting 
     ``226''
       (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``162'' and inserting 
     ``157''; and
       (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``198'' and inserting 
     ``193''; and
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``310'' and inserting 
     ``300''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2)--
       (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``85'' and inserting 
     ``81'';
       (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``61'' and inserting 
     ``59'';
       (iii) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``73'' and inserting 
     ``70''; and
       (iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``21'' and inserting 
     ``20''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect on October 1, 2014.

                Subtitle B--Reserve Component Management

     SEC. 511. MINIMUM NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
                   RESERVE COMPONENTS BEFORE DEPLOYMENT OR 
                   CANCELLATION OF DEPLOYMENT RELATED TO A 
                   CONTINGENCY OPERATION.

       Section 12301 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (e), by striking ``The period'' and 
     inserting ``Subject to subsection (i), the period''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(i)(1) The Secretary concerned shall provide not less 
     than 120 days advance notice to a unit of the reserve 
     components that--
       ``(A) will be ordered to active duty for deployment in 
     connection with a contingency operation; or
       ``(B) having been notified of such a deployment, has such 
     deployment canceled, postponed, or otherwise altered.
       ``(2) If a member of the reserve components is not assigned 
     to a unit organized to serve as a unit or is to be ordered to 
     active duty apart from the member's unit, the required notice 
     under paragraph (1) shall be provided directly to the member.
       ``(3) If the Secretary concerned fails to provide timely 
     notification as required by paragraph (1) or (2), the 
     Secretary concerned shall submit, within 30 days after the 
     date of the failure, written notification to the Committees 
     on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
     Senate explaining the reason for the failure and the units 
     and members of the reserve components affected.''.

     SEC. 512. INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO BOARDS CONSIDERING 
                   OFFICERS FOR SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL FROM 
                   RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.

       (a) Officers to Be Considered; Exclusions.--Section 
     14704(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Whenever'' ;
       (2) by striking ``all officers on that list'' and inserting 
     ``officers on the reserve active-status list'';
       (3) by striking ``the reserve active-status list, in the 
     number specified by the Secretary by each grade and 
     competitive category.'' and inserting ``that list.''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
       ``(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of 
     officers in a reserve component whose

[[Page 8916]]

     names are submitted to a board under paragraph (1) shall 
     include each officer on the reserve active-status list for 
     that reserve component in the same grade and competitive 
     category whose position on the reserve active-status list is 
     between--
       ``(A) that of the most junior officer in that grade and 
     competitive category whose name is submitted to the board; 
     and
       ``(B) that of the most senior officer in that grade and 
     competitive category whose name is submitted to the board.
       ``(3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may 
     not include an officer who--
       ``(A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or
       ``(B) is to be involuntarily retired under any provision of 
     law during the fiscal year in which the board is convened or 
     during the following fiscal year.''.
       (b) Specification of Number of Officers Who May Be 
     Recommended for Removal.--Such section is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
     (c) and (d), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(b) Specification of Number of Officers Who May Be 
     Recommended for Separation.--The Secretary of the military 
     department concerned shall specify the number of officers 
     described in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for 
     separation under subsection (c).''.

     SEC. 513. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO MAINTAIN ACTIVE STATUS AND 
                   INACTIVE STATUS LISTS OF MEMBERS IN THE 
                   INACTIVE NATIONAL GUARD.

       (a) Authority to Maintain Active and Inactive Status Lists 
     in the Inactive National Guard.--
       (1) Active and inactive status lists authorized.--The 
     Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force may 
     maintain an active status list and an inactive status list of 
     members in the inactive Army National Guard and the inactive 
     Air National Guard, respectively.
       (2) Total number on all lists at one time.--The total 
     number of members of the Army National Guard and members of 
     the Air National Guard on the active status lists and the 
     inactive status lists assigned to the inactive National Guard 
     may not exceed a total of 10,000 at any time.
       (3) Total number on active status lists at one time.--The 
     total number of members of the Army National Guard and 
     members of the Air National Guard on the active status lists 
     of the inactive National Guard may not exceed 4,000 at any 
     time.
       (4) Condition of implementation.--Before the authority 
     provided by this subsection is used to establish an active 
     status list and an inactive status list of members in the 
     inactive Army National Guard or the inactive Air National 
     Guard, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
     and the Senate a copy of the implementation guidance to be 
     used to execute this authority.
       (b) Additional Enlisted Member Transfer Authority.--In 
     addition to the transfer authority provided by section 303(b) 
     of title 32, United States Code, while an inactive status 
     list for the inactive National Guard exists--
       (1) an enlisted member of the active Army National Guard 
     may be transferred to the inactive Army National Guard 
     without regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in 
     the inactive Army National Guard; and
       (2) an enlisted member of the active Air National Guard may 
     be transferred to the inactive Air National Guard without 
     regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in the 
     inactive Air National Guard.
       (c) Removal of Restrictions on Transfer of Officers.--While 
     an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard 
     exists, nothing in chapter 3 of title 32, United States Code, 
     shall be construed to prevent any of the following:
       (1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a 
     vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National 
     Guard from being transferred from the active Army National 
     Guard to the inactive Army National Guard.
       (2) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a 
     vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Air National 
     Guard from being transferred from the active Air National 
     Guard to the inactive Air National Guard.
       (3) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred to 
     the inactive Army National Guard from being transferred from 
     the inactive Army National Guard to the active Army National 
     Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
       (4) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to the 
     inactive Air National Guard from being transferred from the 
     inactive Air National Guard to the active Air National Guard 
     to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
       (d) Status and Training Categories for Members in Inactive 
     Status.--While an inactive status list for the inactive Army 
     National Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists--
       (1) the first sentence of subsection (b) of section 10141 
     of title 10, United States Code, shall apply only with 
     respect to members of the reserve components assigned to the 
     inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard 
     who are assigned to such inactive status list; and
       (2) the exclusion of the Army National Guard of the United 
     States or Air National Guard of the United States under the 
     first sentence of subsection (c) of such section shall not 
     apply.
       (e) Eligibility for Inactive-duty Training Pay.--While an 
     inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists, 
     the limitation on pay for inactive-duty training contained in 
     section 206(c) of title 37, United States Code, shall apply 
     only to persons assigned to the inactive status list of the 
     inactive National Guard, rather than to all persons enlisted 
     in the inactive National Guard.
       (f) Conforming Amendments.--
       (1) Modification of active status definition.--Section 
     101(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new sentence: ``However, 
     while an inactive status list for the inactive Army National 
     Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists, such term means 
     the status of a member of the Army National Guard of the 
     United States or Air National Guard of the United States who 
     is not assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive 
     Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard, on 
     another inactive status list, or in the Retired Reserve.''.
       (2) Computation of years of service for entitlement to 
     retired pay.--Paragraph (3) of section 12732(b) of such title 
     is amended to read as follows:
       ``(3) Service in the inactive National Guard (for any 
     period other than a period in which an inactive status list 
     for the inactive National Guard exists) and service while 
     assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive National 
     Guard (for any period in which an inactive status list for 
     the inactive National Guard exists).''.
       (g) Evaluation of Use of Authority.--
       (1) Independent study required.--Before the end of the 
     period specified in subsection (h), the Secretary of Defense 
     shall commission an independent study to evaluate the 
     effectiveness of using an active status list for the inactive 
     National Guard to improve the readiness of the Army National 
     Guard and the Air National Guard.
       (2) Elements.--As part of the study required by this 
     subsection, the entity conducting the study shall determine, 
     for each year in which the temporary authority provided by 
     subsection (a) is used--
       (A) how many members of the Army National Guard and the Air 
     National Guard were transferred to the active status list of 
     the inactive National Guard;
       (B) how many of these vacancies were filled with personnel 
     new to the Army National Guard;
       (C) the additional cost of filling these positions; and
       (D) the impact on drill and annual training participation 
     rates.
       (3) Additional consideration.--The study required by this 
     subsection also shall include an assessment of the impact of 
     the use of the temporary authority provided by subsection (a) 
     on medical readiness category 3B personnel transferred to the 
     active status inactive National Guard, including--
       (A) how long it took them to complete the Integrated 
     Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process; and
       (B) how satisfied they were with their unit's management 
     and collaboration during the IDES process.
       (4) Submission of results.--Not later than 180 days after 
     completion of the study required by this subsection, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 
     Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 
     report containing the results of the study.
       (h) Duration of Authority.--The authority provided by 
     subsection (a) for the maintenance of both an active status 
     list and inactive status list of members in the inactive 
     National Guard exists only during the period beginning on 
     October 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2018.

     SEC. 514. REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZATIONS FOR 
                   RESERVE COMPONENT GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS IN 
                   AN ACTIVE STATUS.

       (a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     conduct a review of the general officer and flag officer 
     requirements for members of the reserve component in an 
     active status.
       (b) Purpose of Review.--The purpose of the review is to 
     ensure that the authorized strengths provided in section 
     12004 of title 10, United States Code, for reserve general 
     officers and reserve flag officers in an active status--
       (1) are based on an objective requirements process and are 
     sufficient for the effective management, leadership, and 
     administration of the reserve components;
       (2) provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which reserve 
     component general and flag officers can continue to be 
     assigned on active duty in joint duty and in-service military 
     positions;
       (3) reflect a review of the appropriateness and number of 
     exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of 
     section 12004 of title 10, United States Code;
       (4) reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved through 
     downgrading or elimination of reserve component general or 
     flag officer positions, including through the conversion of 
     certain reserve component general or flag officer positions 
     to senior civilian positions; and
       (5) are subjected to periodic review, control, and 
     adjustment.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
     House of Representatives a report containing the results of 
     the review, including such recommendations for changes in law 
     and policy related to authorized reserve general and flag 
     officers strengths as the Secretary considers to be 
     appropriate.

[[Page 8917]]



     SEC. 515. FEASABILITY STUDY ON ESTABLISHING A UNIT OF THE 
                   NATIONAL GUARD IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND IN THE 
                   COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.

       (a) Study Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 
     a study to determine the feasibility of establishing--
       (1) a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa; and
       (2) a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth of the 
     Northern Mariana Islands.
       (b) Force Structure Elements of Study.--In conducting the 
     study required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 
     shall consider the following:
       (1) The allocation of National Guard force structure and 
     manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the 
     Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the establishment of 
     a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the 
     Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the impact 
     of this allocation on existing National Guard units in the 50 
     states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, 
     Guam, and the District of Columbia.
       (2) The Federal funding that would be required to support 
     pay, benefits, training operations, and missions of members 
     of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the 
     Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, based on the 
     allocation derived from paragraph (1), and the equipment, 
     including maintenance, required to support such force 
     structure.
       (3) The presence of existing infrastructure to support a 
     unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the 
     Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the 
     requirement for additional infrastructure, including 
     information technology infrastructure, to support such force 
     structure, based on the allocation derived from paragraph 
     (1).
       (4) How a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and 
     the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island would 
     accommodate the National Guard Bureau's ``Essential Ten'' 
     homeland defense capabilities (i.e., aviation, engineering, 
     civil support teams, security, medical, transportation, 
     maintenance, logistics, joint force headquarters, and 
     communications) and reflect regional needs.
       (5) The manpower cadre, both military personnel and full-
     time support, including National Guard technicians, required 
     to establish, maintain, and sustain a unit of the National 
     Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern 
     Mariana Islands, and the ability of American Samoa and of the 
     Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to support 
     demographically a unit of the National Guard at each 
     location.
       (6) The ability of a unit of the National Guard in American 
     Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to 
     maintain unit readiness and the logistical challenges 
     associated with transportation, communications, supply/
     resupply, and training operations and missions.
       (c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 180 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
     a report containing the results of the study conducted under 
     subsection (a). The report shall also include the following:
       (1) A determination of whether the executive branch of 
     American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern 
     Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented statutory 
     authorization for an organized militia as a prerequisite for 
     establishing a unit of the National Guard, and a description 
     of any other steps that such executive branches must take to 
     request and carry out the establishment of a National Guard 
     unit.
       (2) A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and 37, 
     United States Code, that would have to be enacted by Congress 
     to provide for the establishment of a unit of the National 
     Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the 
     Northern Mariana Islands.
       (3) A description of any required Department of Defense 
     actions to establish a unit of the National Guard in American 
     Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
     Islands.
       (4) A suggested timeline for completion of the steps and 
     actions described in the preceding paragraphs.

                Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

     SEC. 521. REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM.

       (a) Review.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 
     review of--
       (1) the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated 
     Disability Evaluation System with respect to members of the 
     reserve components of the Armed Forces for the purpose of 
     addressing the matters specified in paragraph (1) of 
     subsection (b); and
       (2) the improvements to the Integrated Disability 
     Evaluation System specified in paragraph (2) of such 
     subsection.
       (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
     and the Senate a report on the review under subsection (a). 
     Such report shall include the following:
       (1) With respect to the reserve components of the Armed 
     Forces--
       (A) the number of pending cases that exist as of the date 
     of the report, listed by military department, component, and, 
     with respect to the National Guard, State;
       (B) as of the date of the report, the average time it takes 
     to process a case in the Integrated Disability Evaluation 
     System;
       (C) a description of the steps the Secretary will take to 
     resolve the backlog of cases in the Integrated Disability 
     Evaluation System; and
       (D) the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve such 
     backlog for each military department.
       (2) With respect to the regular components and reserve 
     components of the Armed Forces--
       (A) a description of the progress being made to transition 
     the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to an integrated 
     and readily accessible electronic format that a member of the 
     Armed Forces may access and see the status of the member 
     during each phase of the system;
       (B) an estimate of the cost to complete the transition to 
     an integrated and readily accessible electronic format; and
       (C) an assessment of the feasibility of improving in-
     transit visibility of pending cases, including by 
     establishing a method of tracking a pending case when a 
     military treatment facility is assigned a packet and pending 
     case for action regarding a member.
       (c) Pending Case Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``pending case'' means a case involving a member of the Armed 
     Forces who, as of the date of the review under subsection 
     (a), is within the Integrated Disability Evaluation System 
     and has been referred to a medical evaluation board.

     SEC. 522. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE 
                   ASSESSMENTS.

       (a) Verification and Tracking Requirements.--The Secretary 
     of Defense shall direct the Secretaries of the military 
     departments to verify and track the compliance of commanding 
     officers in conducting organizational climate assessments 
     required as part of the comprehensive policy for the 
     Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response 
     program pursuant to section 572(a)(3) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1753).
       (b) Implementation.--No later than 90 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     House of Representatives a report containing--
       (1) a description of the progress of the development of the 
     system that will verify and track the compliance of 
     commanding officers in conducting organizational climate 
     assessments; and
       (2) an estimate of when the system will be completed and 
     implemented.

     SEC. 523. COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR 
                   REMAINS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR 
                   FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS WHO DIE OUTSIDE THE 
                   UNITED STATES.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall take such steps as 
     may be necessary to ensure that there is continuous, 
     designated military command responsibility and accountability 
     for the care, handling, and transportation of the remains of 
     each deceased member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine 
     Corps who died outside the United States, beginning with the 
     initial recovery of the remains, through the defense mortuary 
     system, until the interment of the remains or the remains are 
     otherwise accepted by the person designated as provided by 
     section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, to direct 
     disposition of the remains.

     SEC. 524. CONTENTS OF TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--Section 1144 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(9) Provide information about disability-related 
     employment and education protections.''.
       (2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as 
     subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and
       (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
     subsection (c):
       ``(c) Additional Elements of Program.--The mandatory 
     program carried out by this section shall include--
       ``(1) for any such member who plans to use the member's 
     entitlement to educational assistance under title 38--
       ``(A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such 
     entitlement; and
       ``(B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for 
     the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible 
     with the member's education goals, and instruction on how to 
     finance the member's post-secondary education; and
       ``(2) instruction in the benefits under laws administered 
     by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects 
     determined by the Secretary concerned.''.
       (b) Deadline for Implementation.--The program carried out 
     under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall 
     comply with the requirements of subsections (b)(9) and (c) of 
     such section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 
     April 1, 2015.
       (c) Feasibility Study.--Not later than 270 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 
     Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs 
     and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
     Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the House of Representatives the results of a 
     study carried out by the Secretary to determine the 
     feasibility of providing the instruction described in 
     subsection (b) of section 1142 of title 10, United States 
     Code, at all overseas locations where such instruction is 
     provided by entering into a contract jointly with the 
     Secretary of Labor for the provision of such instruction.

[[Page 8918]]



     SEC. 525. PROCEDURES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MILITARY 
                   PERSONNEL DECISIONS RELATING TO CORRECTION OF 
                   MILITARY RECORDS.

       (a) Availability of Judicial Review; Limitations.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 79 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     section:

     ``Sec. 1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to 
       correction of military records

       ``(a) Availability of Judicial Review.--
       ``(1) In general.--Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of 
     title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5 any person adversely 
     affected by a records correction final decision may obtain 
     judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction 
     to hear the matter.
       ``(2) Records correction final decision defined.--In this 
     section, the term `records correction final decision' means 
     any of the following decisions:
       ``(A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned 
     pursuant to section 1552 of this title.
       ``(B) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned 
     pursuant to section 1034(f) of this title.
       ``(C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense 
     pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title.
       ``(b) Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies.--
       ``(1) General rule.--Except as provided in paragraphs (3) 
     and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to 
     correction under a provision of law specified in subsection 
     (a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other 
     provision of law unless--
       ``(A) the petitioner has requested a correction under 
     section 1552 of this title (including such a request in a 
     matter arising under section 1034 of this title); and
       ``(B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision 
     denying that correction in whole or in part.
       ``(2) Whistleblower cases.--When the final decision of the 
     Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of 
     Defense under section 1034(g) of this title, the petitioner 
     is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial 
     review, but if the petitioner does seek such review, judicial 
     review may not be sought until the earlier of the following 
     occurs:
       ``(A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the 
     matter.
       ``(B) The period specified in section 1034(g) of this title 
     for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires.
       ``(3) Class actions.--If judicial review of a records 
     correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for 
     such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with 
     respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a 
     correction under section 1552 of this title (including such a 
     request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title) 
     and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case, 
     paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the 
     certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to 
     any matter covered by a claim for which the class is 
     certified.
       ``(4) Timeliness.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the 
     records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned 
     is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on 
     which the petitioner requests a correction.
       ``(c) Statutes of Limitation.--
       ``(1) Six years from final decision.--A records correction 
     final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2) 
     applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section 
     or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition 
     for such review is filed in a court not later than six years 
     after the date of the records correction final decision.
       ``(2) Six years for certain claims that may result in 
     payment of money.--(A) In a case of a records correction 
     final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records 
     correction final decision (or the portion of such decision 
     described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial 
     review under this section or otherwise subject to review in 
     any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court 
     before the end of the six-year period that began on the date 
     of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death 
     while on active duty, of the person whose military records 
     are the subject of the correction request. Such six-year 
     period does not include any time between the date of the 
     filing of the request for correction of military records 
     leading to the records correction final decision and the date 
     of the final decision.
       ``(B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction 
     final decision or portion of the decision that involves a 
     denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the 
     court, would support, or result in, the payment of money, 
     other than payments made under chapter 73 of this title, 
     either under a court order or under a subsequent 
     administrative determination.
       ``(d) Habeas Corpus.--This section does not affect any 
     cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``1560. Judicial review of decisions.''.

       (b) Effect of Denial of Request for Correction of Records 
     When Prohibited Personnel Action Alleged.--
       (1) Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review.--
     Subsection (f) of section 1034 of such title is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(7) In any case in which the final decision of the 
     Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, 
     of any requested correction of the record of the member or 
     former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the 
     member or former member--
       ``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(B) a notification of the availability of judicial review 
     of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and 
     the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with 
     the applicable statute of limitations.''.
       (2) Secretary of defense review; notice of denial.--
     Subsection (g) of such section is amended--
       (A) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Upon the completion of 
     all''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense 
     by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be 
     made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former 
     member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military 
     department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the 
     final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial, 
     in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the 
     record of the member or former member, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall provide the member or former member--
       ``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(B) a notification of the availability of judicial review 
     of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and 
     the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with 
     the applicable statute of limitations.''.
       (3) Sole basis for judicial review.--Such section is 
     further amended--
       (A) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections 
     (i) and (j), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new 
     subsection (h):
       ``(h) Judicial Review.--(1) A decision of the Secretary of 
     Defense under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial 
     review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.
       ``(2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense 
     under subsection (g) was not sought, a decision of the 
     Secretary of a military department under subsection (f) shall 
     be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 
     1560 of this title.
       ``(3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security 
     under subsection (f) shall be subject to judicial review only 
     as provided in section 1560 of this title.''.
       (c) Effect of Denial of Other Requests for Correction of 
     Military Records.--Section 1552 of such title is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new subsections:
       ``(h) In any case in which the final decision of the 
     Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, 
     of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall 
     provide the claimant--
       ``(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the 
     decision; and
       ``(2) a notification of the availability of judicial review 
     of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and 
     the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with 
     the applicable statute of limitations.
       ``(i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this 
     section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided 
     in section 1560 of this title.''.
       (d) Effective Date and Application.--
       (1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall 
     take effect on January 1, 2015, and shall apply to all final 
     decisions of the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(g) 
     of title 10, United States Code, and of the Secretary of a 
     military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security 
     under sections 1034(f) or 1552 of such title rendered on or 
     after such date.
       (2) Treatment of existing cases.--This section and the 
     amendments made by this section do not affect the authority 
     of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was 
     properly before the court before the effective date specified 
     in paragraph (1).
       (e) Implementation.--The Secretary of a military department 
     and the Secretary of Homeland Security (in the case of the 
     Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the 
     Department of the Navy) may prescribe regulations, and 
     interim guidance before prescribing such regulations, to 
     implement the amendments made by this section. Regulations or 
     interim guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military 
     department may not take effect until approved by the 
     Secretary of Defense.

     SEC. 526. ESTABLISHMENT AND USE OF CONSISTENT DEFINITION OF 
                   GENDER-NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD FOR 
                   MILITARY CAREER DESIGNATORS.

       (a) Establishment of Definitions.--Section 543 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 
     (Public Law 103-160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding 
     at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(d) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) Gender-neutral occupational standard.--The term 
     `gender-neutral occupational standard', with respect to a 
     military career designator, means that all members of the 
     Armed Forces serving in or assigned to the military career 
     designator must meet the same physical and performance 
     outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of 
     the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the 
     qualifications and duties performed while serving in or 
     assigned to the military career designator.
       ``(2) Military career designator.--The term `military 
     career designator' refers to--

[[Page 8919]]

       ``(A) in the case of enlisted members and warrant officers 
     of the Armed Forces, military occupational specialties, 
     specialty codes, enlisted designators, enlisted 
     classification codes, additional skill identifiers, and 
     special qualification identifiers; and
       ``(B) in the case of commissioned officers (other than 
     commissioned warrant officers), officer areas of 
     concentration, occupational specialties, specialty codes, 
     additional skill identifiers, and special qualification 
     identifiers.''.
       (b) Use of Definitions.--Such section is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
     ``military occupational career field'' and inserting 
     ``military career designator''; and
       (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``common, relevant 
     performance standards'' and inserting ``an occupational 
     standard'';
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) in paragraph (1)--
       (i) by striking ``any military occupational specialty'' and 
     inserting ``any military career designator''; and
       (ii) by striking ``requirements for members in that 
     specialty and shall ensure (in the case of an occupational 
     specialty'' and inserting ``requirements as part of the 
     gender-neutral occupational standard for members in that 
     career designator and shall ensure (in the case of a career 
     designator''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2)--
       (i) by striking ``an occupational specialty'' and inserting 
     ``a military career designator'';
       (ii) by striking ``that occupational specialty'' and 
     inserting ``that military career designator''; and
       (iii) by striking ``that specialty'' and inserting ``that 
     military career designator''; and
       (3) in subsection (c)--
       (A) by striking ``the occupational standards for a military 
     occupational field'' and inserting ``the gender-neutral 
     occupational standard for a military career designator''; and
       (B) by striking ``that occupational field'' and inserting 
     ``that military career designator''.

     SEC. 527. EXPANSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES RELATING 
                   TO PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES AND PROHIBITED RETALIATORY 
                   ACTIONS.

       (a) Expansion of Prohibited Retaliatory Personnel 
     Actions.--Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)(B)--
       (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iv);
       (B) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi); and
       (C) by inserting after clause (iv) the following new clause 
     (v):
       ``(v) a court-martial proceeding; or''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``any favorable 
     action'' the following: ``, or a significant change in a 
     member's duties, responsibilities, or working conditions''.
       (b) Inspector General Investigations of Allegations.--
     Subsection (c) of such section is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (3)'' and 
     inserting ``paragraph (4)'';
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (A) and 
     inserting the following new subparagraph (A):
       ``(A) Any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, 
     including a law or regulation prohibiting rape, sexual 
     assault, or other sexual misconduct in sections 920 through 
     920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform 
     Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment or unlawful 
     discrimination.'';
       (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as 
     paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively;
       (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
     paragraph (3):
       ``(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not 
     be excluded from the protections provided in this section 
     because--
       ``(A) the communication was made to a person who 
     participated in an activity that the member reasonably 
     believed to be covered by paragraph (2);
       ``(B) the communication revealed information that had 
     previously been communicated;
       ``(C) of the member's motive for making the communication;
       ``(D) the communication was not made in writing;
       ``(E) the communication was made while the member was off 
     duty;
       ``(F) the communication was made during the normal course 
     of duties of the member.'';
       (5) in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (4), as redesignated 
     by paragraph (3) of this subsection, by inserting before the 
     period at the end of the second sentence the following: ``, 
     with the consent of the member'';
       (6) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated--
       (A) by striking ``paragraph (3)(A)'' and inserting 
     ``paragraph (4)(A)'';
       (B) by striking ``paragraph (3)(D)'' and inserting 
     ``paragraph (4)(D)''; and
       (C) by striking ``60 days'' and inserting ``one year''.
       (c) Inspector General Investigations of Underlying 
     Allegations.--Subsection (d) of such section is amended by 
     striking ``subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(2)'' and 
     inserting ``subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection 
     (c)(2)''.
       (d) Reports on Investigations.--Subsection (e) of such 
     section is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) by striking ``subsection (c)(3)(E)'' both places it 
     appears and inserting ``subsection (c)(4)(E)'';
       (B) by striking ``the Secretary of Defense'' and inserting 
     ``the Secretary of the military department concerned'';
       (C) by striking ``to the Secretary,'' and inserting ``to 
     such Secretary,'';
       (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``the Secretary of 
     Defense'' and inserting ``the Secretary of the military 
     department concerned'';
       (3) in paragraph (4), by striking the second sentence and 
     inserting the following new sentence: ``The report shall 
     include an explicit determination as to whether a personnel 
     action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred and a 
     recommendation as to the disposition of the complaint, 
     including appropriate corrective action for the member.''.
       (e) Action in Case of Violations.--Section 1034 of title 
     10, United States Code, is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j), as 
     redesignated by section 525(b) of this Act, as subsections 
     (k) and (l), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (h), as added by section 
     525(b), the following new subsection:
       ``(i) Action in Case of Violations.--(1) If an Inspector 
     General reports under subsection (e) that a personnel action 
     prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, not later than 30 
     days after receiving such report from the Inspector General, 
     the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the 
     military department concerned, as applicable, shall order 
     such action as is necessary to correct the record of a 
     personnel action prohibited by subsection (b), taking into 
     account the recommendations in the report by the Inspector 
     General. Such Secretary shall take any appropriate 
     disciplinary action against the individual who committed such 
     prohibited personnel action.
       ``(2) If the Secretary of Homeland Security or the 
     Secretary of the military department concerned, as 
     applicable, determines that an order for corrective or 
     disciplinary action is not appropriate, not later than 30 
     days after making the determination, such Secretary shall--
       ``(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense, the Committees 
     on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives, and the member or former member, a notice of 
     the determination and the reasons for not taking action; and
       ``(B) refer the report to the appropriate board for the 
     correction of military records for further review under 
     subsection (g).''.
       (f) Correction of Records.--Subsection (f) of such section 
     is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
     ``upon the request of the member or former member, after an 
     initial determination that a complaint is not frivolous and 
     has not previously been addressed by the board, shall''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
     ``board elects to hold'' and inserting ``board holds''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (A)--
       (i) by striking ``may be provided'' and inserting ``shall 
     be provided''; and
       (ii) in clause (ii), by striking ``the case is unusually 
     complex or otherwise requires'' and inserting ``the member or 
     former member would benefit from''.
       (g) Burdens of Proof.--Such section is further amended by 
     inserting after subsection (i), as added by subsection (e) of 
     this section, the following new subsection:
       ``(j) Burdens of Proof.--The burdens of proof specified in 
     section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation 
     conducted by an Inspector General, and any review conducted 
     by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland 
     Security, and any board for the correction of military 
     records, under this section.''.
       (h) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to 
     allegations pending or submitted under section 1034 of title 
     10, United States Code, on or after that date.

     SEC. 528. APPLICABILITY OF MEDICAL EXAMINATION REQUIREMENT 
                   REGARDING POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER OR 
                   TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE 
                   UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.

       Section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     striking subsection (c).

     SEC. 529. PROTECTION OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF MILITARY 
                   CHAPLAINS TO CLOSE A PRAYER OUTSIDE OF A 
                   RELIGIOUS SERVICE ACCORDING TO THE TRADITIONS, 
                   EXPRESSIONS, AND RELIGIOUS EXERCISES OF THE 
                   ENDORSING FAITH GROUP.

       (a) United States Army.--Section 3547 of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new subsection:
       ``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (b) United States Military Academy.--Section 4337 of such 
     title is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (c) United States Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6031 of 
     such title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, a chaplain shall have the

[[Page 8920]]

     prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, 
     expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith 
     group.''.
       (d) United States Air Force.--Section 8547 of such title is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
       (e) United States Air Force Academy.--Section 9337 of such 
     title is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a 
     religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to 
     close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, 
     and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.

     SEC. 530. EXPANSION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTION OF 
                   RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES AND CHAPLAINS OF SUCH MEMBERS.

       (a) Accommodation of Members' Beliefs, Actions, and 
     Speech.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``The Armed Forces shall accommodate the 
     beliefs'' and inserting ``Except in cases of military 
     necessity, the Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs, 
     actions, and speech''; and
       (2) by inserting ``, actions, or speech'' after ``such 
     beliefs''.
       (b) Narrow Exception.--Subsection (a)(2) of such section is 
     amended by striking ``that threaten'' and inserting ``that 
     actually harm''.
       (c) Deadline for Regulations; Consultation.--The 
     implementation regulations required by subsection (c) of such 
     section shall be issued not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act. In preparing such 
     regulations, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the 
     official military faith-group representatives who endorse 
     military chaplains.

     SEC. 530A. SERVICEMEMBERS' ACCOUNTABILITY, RIGHTS, AND 
                   RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING.

       (a) Responsibilities of Secretary of Defense.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, acting through 
     the Secretaries of the military departments, shall ensure 
     that all members of the Armed Forces understand and comply 
     with the rights and responsibilities specified in subsections 
     (b) and (c).
       (2) Implementation.--The Secretary of Defense shall have 
     discretion regarding the manner in which this information 
     will be disseminated to members, except that, at a minimum, 
     the Secretary shall require acknowledgment of these rights 
     and responsibilities by a member at these occurrences during 
     the military service of the member:
       (A) Recruitment.
       (B) Enlistment and reenlistment.
       (C) Commissioning.
       (D) Promotion in rank.
       (E) Selection for command.
       (b) Member Rights.--Each member of the Armed Forces has the 
     following rights:
       (1) To a workplace and battlespace free from the threat of 
     sexual violence, including harassment, abuse, assault, and 
     rape.
       (2) To have every instance of illegal activity 
     appropriately investigated. Law enforcement agencies will 
     investigate every allegation of criminal behavior, and 
     commanders will respond appropriately to every report of 
     wrongdoing.
       (3) To make a restricted or unrestricted report of a sex-
     based criminal act. Victims will have access to vital 
     services whether they pursue an investigation or not.
       (4) To use any and all reporting and prosecution avenues to 
     pursue an allegation of sexual assault.
       (5) To not face retaliation for reporting a criminal 
     offense or harmful behavior.
       (c) Member Responsibilities.--Each member of the Armed 
     Forces has the following responsibilities:
       (1) To responsibly intervene in any situation that involves 
     the presence or threat of criminal behavior.
       (2) To never leave another member behind in a situation of 
     risk to self or others, on the battlefield or anywhere else.
       (3) To immediately report observation or knowledge of 
     criminal behavior to appropriate officials.

     SEC. 530B. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   REVIEW OF SEPARATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES WHO MADE UNRESTRICTED REPORTS OF SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULT.

       (a) Review Required.--The Inspector General of the 
     Department of Defense shall conduct a review--
       (1) to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since 
     January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after 
     making an unrestricted report of sexual assault;
       (2) to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each 
     such separation, including--
       (A) whether the separation was in retaliation for or 
     influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted 
     report of sexual assault; and
       (B) whether the identified member requested an appeal; and
       (3) if an identified member was separated on the grounds of 
     having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine 
     whether the separation was carried out in compliance with 
     Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any other 
     applicable Department of Defense regulations, directives, and 
     policies.
       (b) Submission of Results and Recommendations.--Not later 
     than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
     the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     the House of Representatives the results of the review 
     conducted under subsection (a), including such 
     recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of 
     Defense considers necessary.

     SEC. 530C. REPORT ON DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTED IN 
                   CONNECTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REVIEW OF 
                   LAWS, POLICIES, AND REGULATIONS RESTRICTING 
                   SERVICE OF FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
     the House of Representatives a report containing the specific 
     results and data produced during the research programs, 
     tests, surveys, consultant reports, assessments, and similar 
     projects conducted to comply with the requirement of section 
     535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4217) to 
     review laws, policies, and regulations that may restrict the 
     service of female members of the Armed Forces.
       (b) Public Availability.--Subject to subsection (c), the 
     Secretary of Defense shall make the report required by 
     subsection (a) publically available.
       (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed as a request or authority for the Secretary of 
     Defense to provide in the report required by subsection (a) 
     any personal information that would identify, or violate the 
     privacy of, members of the Armed Forces, including members 
     who participated in the research programs, tests, surveys, 
     reports, assessments, and similar projects conducted 
     regarding the possible future assignments of female members 
     of the Armed Forces.

     SEC. 530D. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE WOMEN IN SERVICE 
                   IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) In February 2012, the Secretary of Defense notified 
     Congress of the intent of the Secretary to rescind the co-
     location restriction and to implement policy exceptions to 
     allow female members of the Armed Forces to be assigned to 
     specified positions in ground combat units at the battalion 
     level.
       (2) On January 24, 2013, the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Joint Chiefs of Staff issued guidance to rescind the direct 
     combat exclusion rule for female members of the Armed Forces 
     and eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to 
     service in the Armed Forces.
       (3) The Secretaries of the military departments were 
     required to develop and submit their plans for implementation 
     of the rescission of the direct combat exclusion rule by May 
     15, 2013.
       (4) As of 2013, there are approximately 202,000 female 
     members of the Armed Forces, approximately 20,000 female 
     members have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and more than 60 
     female members have been killed in combat.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     the Secretaries of the military departments--
       (1) no later than September 2015, should develop, review, 
     and validate individual occupational standards, using 
     validated gender-neutral occupational standards, so as to 
     assess and assign members of the Armed Forces to units, 
     including Special Operations Forces; and
       (2) no later than January 1, 2016, should complete all 
     assessments.

 Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and 
                                Response

     SEC. 531. LIMITATIONS ON CONVENING AUTHORITY DISCRETION 
                   REGARDING COURT-MARTIAL FINDINGS AND SENTENCE.

       (a) Elimination of Unlimited Command Prerogative and 
     Discretion.--Paragraph (1) of section 860(c) of title 10, 
     United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice) is amended by striking the first sentence.
       (b) Limitations on Discretion Regarding Court-martial 
     Findings.--Paragraph (3) of section 860(c) of title 10, 
     United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(3)(A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the 
     convening authority or by another person authorized to act 
     under this section is not required.
       ``(B) If the convening authority or another person 
     authorized to act under this section acts on the findings of 
     a court-martial, the convening authority or other person may 
     not--
       ``(i) dismiss any charge or specification, other than a 
     charge or specification for a qualifying offense, by setting 
     aside a finding of guilty thereto; or
       ``(ii) change a finding of guilty to a charge or 
     specification, other than a charge or specification for a 
     qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an offense that 
     is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the 
     charge or specification.
       ``(C) If the convening authority or another person 
     authorized to act under this section acts on the findings to 
     dismiss or change any charge

[[Page 8921]]

     or specification for a qualifying offense, the convening 
     authority or other person shall provide, at that same time, a 
     written explanation of the reasons for such action. The 
     written explanation shall be made a part of the record of the 
     trial and action thereon.
       ``(D)(i) In this paragraph, the term `qualifying offense' 
     means, except in the case of an offense specified in clause 
     (ii), an offense under this chapter for which--
       ``(I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be 
     adjudged does not exceed two years; and
       ``(II) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a 
     dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for 
     more than six months.
       ``(ii) Such term does not include the following:
       ``(I) An offense under section 920 of this title (article 
     120).
       ``(II) An offense under section 928 of this title (article 
     128), if such offense consisted of assault consummated by 
     battery upon child under 16 years of age.
       ``(III) An offense under section 934 of this title (article 
     134), if such offense consisted of indecent language 
     communicated to child under the age of 16 years.
       ``(IV) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may 
     exclude by regulation.''.
       (c) Limitations on Discretion to Modify an Adjudged 
     Sentence.--Section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code 
     (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``The convening 
     authority'' and inserting the following:
       ``(B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening 
     authority''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(4)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), 
     the convening authority or another person authorized to act 
     under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence of 
     confinement or a punitive discharge or disapprove, commute, 
     or suspend an adjudged sentence of confinement or a punitive 
     discharge in whole or in part.
       ``(B)(i) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, the 
     convening authority or another person authorized to act under 
     this section shall have the authority to impose a sentence 
     below a level established by statute as a minimum sentence, 
     to impose a sentence of confinement below the adjudged 
     confinement sentence, or to disapprove, commute, or suspend 
     the adjudged sentence in whole or in part in recognition of 
     the substantial assistance by the accused in the 
     investigation or prosecution of another person who has 
     committed an offense.
       ``(ii) If a mandatory minimum sentence exists for a charge, 
     the convening authority or another person authorized to act 
     under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence to 
     reduce the sentence to less than the mandatory minimum 
     sentence or disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged 
     mandatory minimum sentence in whole or in part. This 
     limitation does not restrict the discretion of the convening 
     authority or another person authorized to act under this 
     section to modify, disapprove, commute, or suspend any 
     portion of the adjudged sentence that is in addition to the 
     mandatory minimum sentence.
       ``(C) In addition, if a mandatory minimum sentence does not 
     exist for a charge and a pre-trial agreement has been entered 
     into by the convening authority and the accused, as 
     authorized by Rule for Court-Martial 705, the convening 
     authority or another person authorized to act under this 
     section may take action to reduce, dismiss, or suspend an 
     adjudged sentence of confinement in whole or in part pursuant 
     to the terms of the pre-trial agreement.''.
       (d) Explanation for Any Decision Disapproving, Commuting, 
     or Suspending Court-martial Sentence.--Section 860(c)(2) of 
     title 10, United States Code (article 60(c)(2) of the Uniform 
     Code of Military Justice), as amended by subsection (c)(1), 
     is further amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(C) If the convening authority or another person 
     authorized to act under this section acts to disapprove, 
     commute, or suspend the sentence in whole or in part, the 
     convening authority or other person shall provide, at that 
     same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such 
     action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the 
     record of the trial and action thereon.''.
       (e) Conforming Amendment to Other Authority for Convening 
     Authority to Suspend Sentence.--Section 871(d) of such title 
     (article 71(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
     ``Paragraphs (2) and (4) of subsection (c) of section 860 of 
     this title (article 60) shall apply to any decision by the 
     convening authority or such person to suspend the execution 
     of any sentence or part thereof under this subsection.''.
       (f) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act and shall apply with respect to findings and 
     sentences of courts-martial reported to convening authorities 
     under section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 
     of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by this 
     section, on or after that effective date.

     SEC. 532. ELIMINATION OF FIVE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON 
                   TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 
                   INVOLVING SEX-RELATED CRIMES.

       (a) Inclusion of Additional Offenses.--Section 843(a) of 
     title 10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform 
     Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ``rape, or 
     rape of a child'' and inserting ``rape or sexual assault, or 
     rape or sexual assault of a child''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 
     10, United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform 
     Code of Military Justice) is amended by inserting before the 
     period at the end the following: ``, unless the offense is 
     covered by subsection (a)''.
       (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
     and shall apply with respect to an offense covered by section 
     920(b) or 920b(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 
     120(b) or 120b(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) 
     that is committed on or after that date.

     SEC. 533. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED 
                   OFFENSES AND TRIAL OF OFFENSES BY GENERAL 
                   COURTS-MARTIAL.

       (a) Mandatory Discharge or Dismissal Required.--
       (1) Imposition.--Section 856 of title 10, United States 
     Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is 
     amended--
       (A) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The punishment''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is 
     found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall 
     be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such 
     punishment must include, at a minimum, dismissal or 
     dishonorable discharge.
       ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:
       ``(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of 
     section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)).
       ``(B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title 
     (article 125).
       ``(C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in 
     subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880 
     of this title (article 80).''.
       (2) Clerical amendments.--
       (A) Section heading.--The heading of such section is 
     amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits''.

       (B) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and 
     inserting the following new item:

``856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.''.

       (b) Jurisdiction Limited to General Courts-martial.--
     Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of 
     the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before the first sentence;
       (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``However, a general 
     court-martial'' and inserting the following:
       ``(b) A general court-martial''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this 
     title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-
     martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in 
     section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2)).''.
       (c) Additional Duties for Independent Panels.--
       (1) Response systems panel.--The independent panel 
     established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 
     (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) 
     shall assess the appropriateness of statutorily mandated 
     minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses under 
     the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The panel shall include 
     the results of the assessment in the report required by 
     subsection (c)(1) of such section.
       (2) Judicial proceedings panel.--The independent panel 
     established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 
     (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) 
     shall assess the implementation and effect of the mandatory 
     minimum sentences established by section 856(b) of title 10, 
     United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice), as added by subsection (a) of this 
     section. The panel shall include the results of the 
     assessment in one of the reports required by subsection 
     (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.
       (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 
     856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) 
     of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by 
     subsection (a)(1), committed after that date.

     SEC. 534. REGULATIONS REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION 
                   FOR PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION OR UNIT 
                   TRANSFER BY VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.

       Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by striking ``The Secretaries of the military departments'' 
     and inserting ``The Secretary concerned''.

     SEC. 535. CONSIDERATION OF NEED FOR, AND AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE 
                   FOR, TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATIVE REASSIGNMENT OR 
                   REMOVAL OF A MEMBER ON ACTIVE DUTY WHO IS 
                   ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A SEXUAL ASSAULT OR 
                   RELATED OFFENSE.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 39 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 673 the following 
     new section:

[[Page 8922]]



     ``Sec. 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal 
       of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual 
       assault or related offense

       ``(a) Guidance for Timely Consideration and Action.--The 
     Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines 
     provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders 
     regarding their authority to make a timely determination, and 
     to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed 
     forces serving on active duty who is alleged to have 
     committed a sexual assault or other sex-related offense 
     covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, or 920c of this title 
     (article 120, 120a, 120b, or 120c of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed 
     from a position of authority or assignment, not as a punitive 
     measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order 
     and discipline within the member's unit.
       ``(b) Time for Determinations.--A determination described 
     in subsection (a) may be made at any time after receipt of 
     notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or 
     other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an 
     alleged perpetrator.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 673 the following new item:

``674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on 
              active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or 
              related offense.''.

       (c) Additional Training Requirement for Commanders.--The 
     Secretary of Defense shall provide for inclusion of 
     information and discussion regarding the availability and use 
     of the authority provided by section 674 of title 10, United 
     States Code, as added by subsection (a), as part of the 
     training for new and prospective commanders at all levels of 
     command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 
     U.S.C. 1561 note).

     SEC. 536. VICTIMS' COUNSEL FOR VICTIMS OF SEX-RELATED 
                   OFFENSES AND RELATED PROVISIONS.

       (a) Designation and Duties.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 1044d the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related 
       offenses

       ``(a) Designation; Purposes.--The Secretary concerned shall 
     designate legal counsel (to be known as `Victims' Counsel') 
     for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an 
     individual eligible for military legal assistance under 
     section 1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged 
     sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that 
     offense is restricted or unrestricted.
       ``(b) Types of Legal Assistance Authorized.--The types of 
     legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the 
     following:
       ``(1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal 
     liability of the victim stemming from or in relation to the 
     circumstances surrounding the alleged sex-related offense and 
     the victim's right to seek military defense services.
       ``(2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness 
     Assistance Program, including--
       ``(A) the rights and benefits afforded the victim;
       ``(B) the role of the Victim Witness Assistance Program 
     liaison and what privileges do or do not exist between the 
     victim and the liaison; and
       ``(C) the nature of communication made to the liaison in 
     comparison to communication made to a Victims' Counsel or a 
     legal assistance attorney under section 1044 of this title.
       ``(3) Legal consultation regarding the responsibilities and 
     support provided to the victim by the Sexual Assault Response 
     Coordinator, a unit or installation Sexual Assault Victim 
     Advocate or domestic abuse advocate, to include any 
     privileges that may exist regarding communications between 
     those persons and the victim.
       ``(4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for civil 
     litigation against other parties (other than the Department 
     of Defense).
       ``(5) Legal consultation regarding the military justice 
     system, including--
       ``(A) the roles and responsibilities of the trial counsel, 
     the defense counsel, and investigators;
       ``(B) any proceedings of the military justice process in 
     which the victim may observe or participate as a witness or 
     other party;
       ``(C) the Government's authority to compel cooperation and 
     testimony; and
       ``(D) the victim's responsibility to testify, and other 
     duties to the court.
       ``(6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in 
     connection with the reporting, military investigation, and 
     military prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense.
       ``(7) Legal consultation regarding--
       ``(A) services available from appropriate agencies or 
     offices for emotional and mental health counseling and other 
     medical services;
       ``(B) eligibility for and requirements for obtaining any 
     available military and veteran benefits, such as transitional 
     compensation benefits found in section 1059 of this title and 
     other State and Federal victims' compensation programs; and
       ``(C) the availability of, and any protections offered by, 
     civilian and military restraining orders.
       ``(8) Legal consultation and assistance in personal civil 
     legal matters in accordance with section 1044 of this title.
       ``(9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of 
     Defense (or, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of 
     the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) may 
     authorize in the regulations prescribed under subsection (g).
       ``(c) Qualifications.--An individual may not be designated 
     as a Victims' Counsel under this section unless the 
     individual--
       ``(1) meets the qualifications specified in section 
     1044(d)(2) of this title; ; and
       ``(2) is certified as competent to be designated as a 
     Victims' Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the Armed 
     Force in which the judge advocate is a member or by which the 
     civilian attorney is employed.
       ``(d) Administrative Responsibility.--(1) Consistent with 
     the regulations prescribed under subsection (g), the Judge 
     Advocate General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title) 
     under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the 
     Marine Corps the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of 
     the Marine Corps, is responsible for the establishment and 
     supervision of individuals designated as Victims' Counsel.
       ``(2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the 
     Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the 
     Coast Guard is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation 
     of the Victims' Counsel programs operated under this section.
       ``(e) Availability of Victims' Counsel.--(1) An individual 
     eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of 
     this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related 
     offense shall be offered the option of receiving assistance 
     from a Victims' Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-related 
     offense or at the time the victim seeks assistance from a 
     Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim 
     Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness 
     liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare provider, or any other 
     personnel designated by the Secretary concerned for purposes 
     of this subsection.
       ``(2) The assistance of a Victims' Counsel under this 
     subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for 
     military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title 
     regardless of whether the individual elects unrestricted or 
     restricted reporting of the alleged sex-related offense. The 
     individual shall also be informed that the assistance of a 
     Victims' Counsel may be declined, in whole or in part, but 
     that declining such assistance does not preclude the 
     individual from subsequently requesting the assistance of a 
     Victims' Counsel.
       ``(f) Alleged Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this 
     section, the term `alleged sex-related offense' means any 
     allegation of--
       ``(1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 
     of ths title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the 
     Uniform Code of Military Justice); or
       ``(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a 
     paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this title 
     (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
       ``(g) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this 
     section.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 1044d the following new item:

``1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses.''.

       (3) Conforming amendments.--
       (A) Qualifications of persons providing legal assistance.--
     Section 1044(d)(2) of such title is amended by inserting 
     before the period at the end the following: ``and, for 
     purposes of service as a Victims' Counsel under section 1044e 
     of this title, meets the additional qualifications specified 
     in subsection (c)(2) of such section.''.
       (B) Inclusion in definition of military legal assistance.--
     Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking 
     ``and 1044d'' and inserting ``1044d, 1044e, and 
     1565b(a)(1)(A)''.
       (C) Access to legal assistance and services.--Section 
     1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking ``section 
     1044'' and inserting ``sections 1044 and 1044e''.
       (4) Implementation.--Section 1044e of title 10, United 
     States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be implemented 
     within six months after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act.
       (b) Enhanced Training Requirement.--The Secretary of each 
     military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security 
     with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a 
     service in the Department of the Navy, shall implement, 
     consistent with the guidelines provided under section 1044e 
     of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), 
     in-depth and advanced training for all military and civilian 
     attorneys providing legal assistance under section 1044 or 
     1044e of such to support victims of alleged sex-related 
     offenses.
       (c) Secretary of Defense Implementation Report.--
       (1) Report required.--Not later than 90 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security with 
     respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees on 
     Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of 
     the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives a report describing how the Armed Forces will 
     implement the requirements of section 1044e of title 10, 
     United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
       (2) Additional submission requirement.--The report required 
     by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to the independent 
     review panel established by the Secretary of Defense under 
     section 576(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law

[[Page 8923]]

     112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) and to the Joint Services Committee 
     on Military Justice.
       (c) Additional Duties for Independent Panels.--
       (1) Response systems panel.--The independent panel 
     established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 
     (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) 
     shall conduct an assessment regarding whether the roles, 
     responsibilities, and authorities of Victims' Counsel to 
     provide legal assistance under section 1044e of title 10, 
     United States Code, as added by subsection (a), to victims of 
     alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to include 
     legal standing to represent the victim during investigative 
     and military justice proceedings in connection with the 
     prosecution of the offense. The panel shall include the 
     results of the assessment in the report required by 
     subsection (c)(1) of such section.
       (2) Judicial proceedings panel.--The independent panel 
     established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 
     (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) 
     shall conduct an assessment of the implementation and effect 
     of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by 
     subsection (a), and make such recommendations for 
     modification of such section 1044e as the panel considers 
     appropriate. The panel shall include the results of the 
     assessment and its recommendations in one of the reports 
     required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.

     SEC. 537. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF 
                   RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE 
                   TO MAKING PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING 
                   SEXUAL ASSAULT.

       Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``sexual harassment or'' and inserting 
     ``rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in 
     violation of sections 920 through 920c of this title 
     (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military 
     Justice), sexual harassment, or''.

     SEC. 538. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON ROLE OF COMMANDERS 
                   IN MILITARY JUSTICE PROCESS.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives a report containing--
       (1) an assessment of the current role and authorities of 
     commanders in the administration of military justice and the 
     investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of offenses 
     under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and
       (2) a recommendation by the Secretary of Defense regarding 
     whether the role and authorities of commanders should be 
     further modified or repealed.

     SEC. 539. REVIEW AND POLICY REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   INVESTIGATIVE PRACTICES IN RESPONSE TO 
                   ALLEGATIONS OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.

       (a) Review.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct 
     a review of the practices of the military criminal 
     investigative organizations (Army Criminal Investigation 
     Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force 
     Office of Special Investigation) regarding the investigation 
     of alleged sex-related offenses involving members of the 
     Armed Forces, including the extent to which the military 
     criminal investigative organizations make a recommendation 
     regarding whether an allegation of a sex-related offense 
     appears founded or unfounded.
       (b) Policy.--After conducting the review required by 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a 
     uniform policy for the Armed Forces, to the extent 
     practicable, regarding the use of case determinations to 
     record the results of the investigation of a sex-related 
     offense. In developing the policy, the Secretary shall 
     consider the feasibility of adopting case determination 
     methods, such as the uniform crime report, used by 
     nonmilitary law enforcement agencies.
       (c) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``sex-related offense'' includes--
       (1) any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, 
     or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a, 
     120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); 
     or
       (2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a 
     paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title 
     (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

     SEC. 540. UNIFORM TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM.

       Section 585(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 
     U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``Not later than one 
     year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary of each military department shall develop a 
     curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response 
     training and education for members of the Armed Forces under 
     the jurisdiction of the Secretary and civilian employees of 
     the military department'' and inserting ``Not later than June 
     30, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform 
     curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response 
     training and education for members of the Armed Forces and 
     civilian employees of the Department of Defense''; and
       (B) in the second sentence, by inserting ``including lesson 
     plans to achieve core competencies and learning objectives,'' 
     after ``curriculum,''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) by striking ``Consistent training.--The Secretary of 
     Defense shall ensure'' and inserting ``Uniform training.--The 
     Secretary of Defense shall require''; and
       (B) by striking ``consistent'' and inserting ``uniform''.

     SEC. 541. DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNMENT AS 
                   SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE AND PREVENTION PROGRAM 
                   MANAGERS, SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS, 
                   SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES, AND SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS-ADULT/ADOLESCENT.

       (a) Qualifications for Assignment.--Section 1602(e)(2) of 
     the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 
     4431) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 
     and
       (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
     following new subparagraphs:
       ``(A) the qualifications necessary for a member of the 
     Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department of 
     Defense to be selected for assignment to duty as a Sexual 
     Assault Response and Prevention Program Manager, Sexual 
     Assault Response Coordinator, or Sexual Assault Victim 
     Advocate, whether assigned to such duty on a full-time or 
     part-time basis;
       ``(B) consistent with section 584(c) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1433), the training, 
     certification, and status of members of the Armed Forces and 
     civilian employees of the department assigned to duty as 
     Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, 
     Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and Sexual Assault 
     Victim Advocates for the Armed Forces; and''.
       (b) Assignment of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
     Adolescent to Certain Military Units.--
       (1) Assignment to certain military units.--Section 584 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended--
       (A) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
     (d) and (e), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
     subsection (c):
       ``(c) Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent.--
       ``(1) Assignment requirements.--The Secretary of each 
     military department shall assign at least one Sexual Assault 
     Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent 
     unit level of each armed force under the jurisdiction of that 
     Secretary unless assignment to other units is determined to 
     be more practicable and effective by the Secretary of 
     Defense. The Secretary of the military department concerned 
     may assign additional Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
     Adolescent as necessary based on the demographics or needs of 
     a military unit. The Secretary of the military department 
     concerned may waive the assignment requirement for a specific 
     unit level if that Secretary determines that compliance will 
     impose an undue burden, except that the Secretary shall 
     notify Congress of each waiver and explain how compliance 
     would impose an undue burden.
       ``(2) Eligible persons.--On and after October 1, 2015, only 
     members of the armed forces and civilian employees of the 
     Department of Defense may be assigned to duty as a Sexual 
     Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent. The Secretary of the 
     military department concerned may satisfy paragraph (1) 
     through the assignment of additional personnel to a unit or 
     by assigning the duties of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-
     Adult/Adolescent to current personnel of the unit, so long as 
     such personnel meet the training and certification 
     requirements of subsection (d).''.
       (2) Training and certification.--Subsection (d) of such 
     section, as redesignated by paragraph (1)(A), is amended--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``assigned under 
     subsection (a) and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates assigned 
     under subsection (b)'' and inserting ``, Sexual Assault 
     Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/
     Adolescent assigned under this section'';
       (B) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following 
     new sentence: ``In the case of the curriculum and other 
     components of the program for certification of Sexual Assault 
     Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall utilize the most recent guidelines and standards as 
     outlined by the Department of Justice, Office on Violence 
     Against Women, in the National Training Standards for Sexual 
     Assault Medical Forensic Examiners.''; and
       (C) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following 
     new sentence: ``On and after October 1, 2015, before a member 
     or civilian employee may be assigned to duty as a Sexual 
     Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent under subsection (c), 
     the member or employee must have completed the training 
     program required by paragraph (1) and obtained the 
     certification.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 584 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1432) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``who satisfy the 
     selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of 
     the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2011

[[Page 8924]]

     (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431)'' 
     after ``Defense''; and
       (2) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``who satisfy the 
     selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of 
     the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2011'' after ``Defense''.
       (d) Clerical Amendment.--The heading of section 584 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended to read 
     as follows:

     ``SEC. 584. SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS, SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES, AND SEXUAL ASSAULT 
                   NURSE EXAMINERS-ADULT/ADOLESCENT.''.

     SEC. 542. EXTENSION OF CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS TO VICTIMS OF 
                   OFFENSES UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY 
                   JUSTICE.

       (a) Victims' Rights.--
       (1) In general.--Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title 10, 
     United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new section 
     (article):

     ``Sec. 806b. Art. 6b. Rights of victims of offenses under 
       this chapter

       ``(a) Rights of a Victim of a Military Crime.--A victim of 
     a military crime has the following rights:
       ``(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the 
     accused.
       ``(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice 
     of any public proceeding in an investigation under section 
     832 of this title (article 32), court-martial, involuntary 
     plea hearing, pre-sentencing hearing, or parole hearing 
     involving the offense or of any release or escape of the 
     accused.
       ``(3) The right not to be excluded from any such public 
     proceeding, referred to in paragraph (2) unless the military 
     judge, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, 
     determines that testimony by the victim of a military crime 
     would be materially altered if the victim of a military crime 
     heard other testimony at that proceeding.
       ``(4) The reasonable right to confer with the trial counsel 
     in the case.
       ``(5) The right to full and timely restitution as provided 
     in law.
       ``(6) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable 
     delay.
       ``(7) The right to be treated with fairness and with 
     respect for the dignity and privacy of the victim of a 
     military crime.
       ``(b) Duty of Military Judge.--In any court-martial 
     proceeding involving an offense against a victim of a 
     military crime, the military judge shall ensure that the 
     victim of a military crime is afforded the rights described 
     in subsection (a). Before making a determination described in 
     subsection (a)(3), the military judge shall make every effort 
     to permit the fullest attendance possible by the victim of a 
     military crime and shall consider reasonable alternatives to 
     the exclusion of the victim of a military crime from the 
     criminal proceeding. The reasons for any decision denying 
     relief under this subsection shall be clearly stated on the 
     record.
       ``(c) Best Efforts Required.--(1) Military judges, trial 
     and defense counsel, military criminal investigation 
     organizations, services, and personnel, and other members and 
     personnel of the Department of Defense engaged in the 
     detection, investigation, or prosecution of offenses under 
     this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) shall 
     make their best efforts to see that a victim of a military 
     crime is notified of, and accorded, the rights described in 
     subsection.
       ``(2) The trial counsel in a case shall advise a victim of 
     a military crime that the victim of a military crime can seek 
     the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights 
     described in subsection (a).
       ``(3) Notice of release otherwise required pursuant to this 
     chapter shall not be given if such notice may endanger the 
     safety of any person.
       ``(d) Victim of a Military Crime Defined.--
       ``(1) Definition.--In this section, the term `victim of a 
     military crime' means a person who has suffered direct 
     physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the 
     commission of a crime in violation of this chapter (the 
     Uniform Code of Military Justice) or in violation of the law 
     of another jurisdiction if any portion of the investigation 
     of the violation of that law was conducted primarily by a 
     military criminal investigative organization (Army Criminal 
     Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, 
     or Air Force Office of Special Investigation). The term shall 
     include, at a minimum, the following:
       ``(A) Members of the armed forces and their dependents.
       ``(B) Civilian employees of the Department of Defense and 
     contractor employees stationed outside the continental United 
     States and their dependents residing with them.
       ``(C) Such other individuals as the Secretary of Defense 
     determines should be included.
       ``(2) Treatment of certain victims.--In the case of a 
     victim of a military crime who is under 18 years of age, 
     incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the term shall also 
     include an individual acting on behalf of the victim who is 
     (in order of precedence) a spouse, parent, legal guardian, 
     child, sibling, or another dependent of the victim or another 
     person designated by the military judge, but in no event 
     shall an accused be designated or included.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title (the 
     Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the 
     end the following new item:

``806b. Art. 6b. Victims' rights of victims of offenses under this 
              chapter.''.

       (b) Procedures To Promote Compliance.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     recommend to the President changes to the Manual for Courts-
     Martial, and prescribe such other regulations as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate, to implement section 806b of 
     title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code 
     of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a).
       (2) Elements.--The modifications and regulations issued 
     pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:
       (A) The designation of an administrative authority within 
     the Department of Defense to oversee the implementation of 
     such section 806(b), and within each Armed Force, an 
     authority to receive and investigate complaints relating to 
     the provision or violation of the rights of victims of 
     military crimes.
       (B) A requirement for a course of training for judge 
     advocates and other appropriate members of the Armed Forces 
     and personnel of the Department to promote compliance with 
     and implementation of such section 806b and assist such 
     personnel in responding more effectively to the needs of 
     victims of military crimes.
       (C) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed Forces 
     and other personnel of the Department of Defense, including 
     suspension or termination from employment in the case of 
     employees of the Department, who willfully or wantonly fail 
     to comply with such section 806b.
       (D) Mechanisms to ensure that the Secretary of Defense 
     shall be the final arbiter of a complaint authorized pursuant 
     to subparagraph (A) by a victim of a military crime that the 
     victim was not afforded a right under such section 806b.
       (c) Additional Duty for Response Systems Independent 
     Panel.--The independent panel established by the Secretary of 
     Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the 
     feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of 
     military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim 
     in civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection 
     (a)(4) of section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and 
     the legal standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights 
     provided by subsection (d) of such section. The panel shall 
     include the results of the assessment in the report required 
     by subsection (c)(1) of such section.

     SEC. 543. DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF COMPLAINING WITNESSES 
                   IN PRESENCE OF COUNSEL FOR THE COMPLAINING 
                   WITNESS OR A SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE.

       Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of 
     the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a) Opportunity To Obtain Witnesses and 
     Other Evidence.--''before ``The trial counsel'';
       (2) by striking ``Process issued'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(c) Process.--Process issued''; and
       (3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by 
     paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b):
       ``(b) Interview of Complaining Witnesses by Defense 
     Counsel.--(1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense counsel 
     of the name and address of the complaining witness or 
     witnesses trial counsel intends to call to testify in any 
     portion of an investigation under section 832 of this title 
     (article 32) or a court-martial under this chapter, defense 
     counsel shall make all requests to interview any such 
     complaining witness through trial counsel.
       ``(2) If requested by a complaining witness subject to a 
     request for interview under paragraph (1), any interview of 
     the witness by defense counsel shall take place only in the 
     presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual 
     Assault Victim Advocate.
       ``(3) In this subsection, the term `complaining witness' 
     means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, 
     or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense 
     under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).''.

     SEC. 544. PARTICIPATION BY COMPLAINING WITNESSES IN CLEMENCY 
                   PHASE OF COURTS-MARTIAL PROCESS.

       Section 860(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 
     60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(b)(1)'';
       (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as 
     subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively, and, in such 
     subparagraphs as so redesignated, by striking ``paragraph 
     (1)'' each place it appears and inserting ``subparagraph 
     (A)''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
       ``(2)(A) In any case in which findings and sentence have 
     been adjudged for an offense involving a complaining witness, 
     the complaining witness shall be provided an opportunity to 
     submit matters for consideration by the convening authority 
     or by another person authorized to act under this section 
     before the convening authority or such other person takes 
     action under this section. Such a submission shall be made 
     within 10 days after the complaining witness has been given 
     an authenticated record of trial and, if applicable, the 
     recommendation of the staff judge advocate or legal officer 
     under subsection (d).

[[Page 8925]]

       ``(B) If a complaining witness shows that additional time 
     is required for submission of matters under subparagraph (A), 
     the convening authority or other person taking action under 
     this section, for good cause, may extend the submission 
     period for not more than an additional 20 days.
       ``(C) In this paragraph, the term `complaining witness' 
     means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, 
     or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense 
     under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
       ``(3) The convening authority shall not consider under this 
     section any submitted matters that go to the character of a 
     complaining witness unless such matters were presented at the 
     trial.''.

     SEC. 545. EIGHT-DAY INCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN 
                   RESPONSE TO UNRESTRICTED REPORT OF SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULT IN WHICH THE VICTIM IS A MEMBER OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Incident Reporting Policy Requirement.--The Secretary 
     of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the 
     Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a 
     policy to require the submission by a designated person of a 
     written incident report not later than eight days after an 
     unrestricted report of sexual assault has been made in which 
     a member of the Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum, 
     this incident report shall be provided to the following:
       (1) The installation commander, if such incident occurred 
     on or in the vicinity of a military installation.
       (2) The first officer in the grade of 0-6 in the chain of 
     command of the victim.
       (3) The first general officer or flag officer in the chain 
     of command of the victim.
       (b) Purpose of the Report.--The purpose of the required 
     incident report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions 
     taken or in progress to provide the necessary care and 
     support to the victim of the assault, to refer the allegation 
     of sexual assault to the appropriate investigatory agency, 
     and to provide initial notification of the serious incident 
     when that notification has not already taken place.
       (c) Elements of Report.--
       (1) In general.--The report of an incident under subsection 
     (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
       (A) Time/Date/Location of incident.
       (B) Type of offense allegation.
       (C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the 
     victim.
       (D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the 
     alleged offender, including information regarding whether the 
     alleged offender has been temporarily transferred or removed 
     from an assigned billet or ordered to pretrial confinement or 
     otherwise restricted, if applicable.
       (E) Post-incident actions taken in connection with the 
     incident, including the following:
       (i) Referral of the victim to medical services and all 
     other services available for members of the Armed Forces who 
     are victims of sexual assault, including the date of each 
     such referral.
       (ii) Receipt and processing status of a request for 
     expedited victim transfer, if applicable.
       (iii) Notification of incident to appropriate investigatory 
     offices, including the organization notified and date of such 
     notification.
       (iv) Issuance of any military protective orders in 
     connection with the incident.
       (2) Modification.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may modify the 
     elements required in a report under this section regarding an 
     incident involving a member of the Armed Forces (including 
     the Coast Guard when it is operating as service in the 
     Department of the Navy) if the Secretary determines that such 
     modification will facilitate compliance with best practices 
     for such reporting as identified by the Sexual Assault 
     Prevention and Response Office of the Department of Defense.
       (B) Coast guard.--The Secretary of the Department in which 
     the Coast Guard is operating may modify the elements required 
     in a report under this section regarding an incident 
     involving a member of the Coast Guard if the Secretary 
     determines that such modification will facilitate compliance 
     with best practices for such reporting as identified by the 
     Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs.
       (3) For official use only.--A report under this section 
     shall be intended for official use only and shall not be 
     distributed beyond the requirements listed above.
       (d) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after enactment, 
     The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department 
     in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe 
     regulations to carry out this section.

     SEC. 546. AMENDMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL TO ELIMINATE 
                   CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO CHARACTER AND 
                   MILITARY SERVICE OF ACCUSED IN INITIAL 
                   DISPOSITION OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.

       (a) Amendment Required.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the President a proposed amendment to rule 
     306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial (relating to policy on 
     initial disposition of offenses) to eliminate the character 
     and military service of the accused from the list of factors 
     that may be considered by the disposition authority in 
     disposing of a sex-related offense.
       (b) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, a ``sex-
     related offense'' includes--
       (1) any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, 
     or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a, 
     120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); 
     or
       (2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a 
     paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title 
     (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

     SEC. 547. INCLUSION OF LETTER OF REPRIMANDS, NONPUNITIVE 
                   LETTER OF REPRIMANDS AND COUNSELING STATEMENTS.

       (a) Inclusion in Performance Evaluation Reports.--The 
     Secretary of Defense shall require commanders to include 
     letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of actions and 
     counseling statements involving substantiated cases of sexual 
     harassment or sexual assault in the performance evaluation 
     report of a member of the Armed Forces for the purpose of--
       (1) providing commanders increased visibility of the 
     background information of members of the unit;
       (2) identifying and preventing trends of bad behavior early 
     and effectively disciplining repeated actions which hinder 
     units from fostering a healthy climate; and
       (3) preventing the transfer of sexual offenders.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``sexual harassment'' has the meaning given 
     such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, 
     Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program.
       (2) The term ``sexual assault'' means any of the offenses 
     described in section 920 of title 10, United States Code 
     (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

     SEC. 548. ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS AND 
                   NEW MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING ENTRY-
                   LEVEL PROCESSING AND TRAINING.

       (a) Defining Inappropriate and Prohibited Relationships, 
     Communication, Conduct, and Contact Between Certain 
     Members.--
       (1) Policy required.--The Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating shall establish and maintain a policy to uniformly 
     define and prescribe, for the persons described in paragraph 
     (2), what constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited 
     relationship, communication, conduct, or contact, including 
     when such an action is consensual, between a member of the 
     Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective 
     member or member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph 
     (2)(B).
       (2) Covered members.--The policy required by paragraph (1) 
     shall apply to--
       (A) a member of the Armed Forces who is superior in rank 
     to, exercises authority or control over, or supervises a 
     person described in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level 
     processing or training of the person; and
       (B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a member of 
     the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level processing or 
     training.
       (3) Inclusion of certain members required.--The members of 
     the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall include, 
     at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached to 
     duty--
       (A) for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons for 
     enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, warrant 
     officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces;
       (B) at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or
       (C) at an entry-level training facility or school of an 
     Armed Force.
       (b) Effect of Violations.--A member of the Armed Forces who 
     violates the policy established pursuant to subsection (a) 
     shall be subject to prosecution under the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice.
       (c) Processing for Administrative Separation.--
       (1) In general.--(A) The Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating shall require the processing for administrative 
     separation of any member of the Armed Forces described in 
     subsection (a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated 
     violation by the member of the policy established pursuant to 
     subsection (a), when the member is not otherwise punitively 
     discharged or dismissed from the Armed Forces for that 
     violation.
       (B) The Secretary of each military department shall revise 
     regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the 
     jurisdiction of the Secretary as necessary to ensure 
     compliance with the requirement under subparagraph (A).
       (2) Required elements.--(A) In imposing the requirement 
     under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any 
     separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces is 
     based on the full facts of the case and that due process 
     procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or 
     additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the 
     Secretaries, pursuant to subsection (f).
       (B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not be 
     interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary 
     of a military department and the Secretary of the Department 
     in which the Coast Guard is operating to process members of 
     the Armed Forces for administrative separation--
       (i) for reasons other than a substantiated violation of the 
     policy established pursuant to subsection (a); or
       (ii) under other provisions of law or regulation.
       (3) Substantiated violation.--For purposes of paragraph 
     (1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described in 
     subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy established pursuant to 
     subsection (a) shall be treated as substantiated if--

[[Page 8926]]

       (A) there has been a court-martial conviction for violation 
     of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not include 
     discharge or dismissal; or
       (B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 815 of 
     title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code 
     of Military Justice) has determined that a member has 
     committed an offense in violation of the policy and imposed 
     nonjudicial punishment upon the member.
       (d) Proposed Uniform Code of Military Justice Punitive 
     Article.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
     House of Representatives--
       (1) a proposed amendment to chapter 47 of title 10, United 
     States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) to create 
     an additional article under subchapter X of such chapter 
     regarding violations of the policy required by subsection 
     (a); and
       (2) the conforming changes to part IV, punitive articles, 
     in the Manual for Courts-Martial that will be necessary upon 
     adoption of such article.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``entry-level processing or training'', with 
     respect to a member of the Armed forces, means the period 
     beginning on the date on which the member became a member of 
     the Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the member 
     physically arrives at that member's first duty assignment 
     following completion of initial entry training (or its 
     equivalent), as defined by the Secretary of the military 
     department concerned or the Secretary of the Department in 
     which the Coast Guard is operating.
       (2) The term ``prospective member of the Armed Forces'' 
     means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a 
     member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty 
     described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member 
     of the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person 
     eventually becomes a member of the Armed Forces.
       (f) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to 
     carry out this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
     that, to the extent practicable, the regulations are uniform 
     for each armed force under the jurisdiction of that 
     Secretary.

     SEC. 549. INDEPENDENT REVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS OF UNIFORM CODE 
                   OF MILITARY JUSTICE AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF 
                   SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES.

       (a) Additional Duties for Response Systems Panel Regarding 
     Disposition Authority.--
       (1) In general.--The independent panel established by the 
     Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall--
       (A) conduct an assessment of the impact, if any, that 
     removing from the chain of command any disposition authority 
     regarding charges preferred under the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice would have on overall reporting and 
     prosecution of sexual assault cases; and
       (B) review and provide comment on the report of the 
     Secretary of Defense on the role of military commanders in 
     the military justice process, which is required pursuant to 
     section 538 of this Act.
       (2) Submission of results.--The panel shall include the 
     results of the assessment and review and its recommendations 
     and comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of 
     such section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this 
     section.
       (b) Earlier Submission Deadline for Report of the Response 
     Systems Panel.--Subsection (c) of section 576 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) is amended by striking paragraph (1) 
     and inserting the following new paragraph:
       ``(1) Response systems panel.--Not later than one year 
     after the date of the first meeting of the panel established 
     under subsection (a)(1), the panel shall submit a report of 
     its findings and recommendations, through the Secretary of 
     Defense, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 
     and the House of Representatives. The panel shall terminate 
     30 days after submission of such report.''.

     SEC. 550. REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND 
                   EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT 
                   CASES.

       (a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     conduct a review of the Office of Diversity Management and 
     Equal Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection 
     (b).
       (b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the review under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall--
       (1) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps 
     in the Office;
       (2) identify and evaluate the role of the Office in sexual 
     harassment cases; and
       (3) evaluate how the Office works with the Sexual Assault 
     Prevention and Response Office to address sexual harassment 
     in the Armed Forces.
       (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``sexual 
     harassment'' has the meaning given such term in Department of 
     Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military 
     Equal Opportunity Program.

                 Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

     SEC. 551. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RECOGNITION OF SPOUSES OF 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO SERVE IN COMBAT 
                   ZONES.

       (a) Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons.--
     Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     inserting after section 1126 the following new section:

     ``Sec. 1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: 
       eligibility and presentation

       ``(a) Design and Eligibility.--A lapel button, to be known 
     as the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be 
     designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to 
     identify and recognize the spouse of a member of the armed 
     forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a 
     period of more than 30 days.
       ``(b) Presentation.--The Secretary concerned may authorize 
     the use of appropriated funds to procure spouse-of-a-combat-
     veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their presentation 
     to eligible spouses of members.
       ``(c) Exception to Time-period Requirement.--The 30-day 
     period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the 
     member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the 
     expiration the period.
       ``(d) License to Manufacture and Sell Lapel Buttons.--
     Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the 
     spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this 
     section.
       ``(e) Combat Zone Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `combat zone' has the meaning given that term in section 
     112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
       ``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall issue 
     such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this 
     section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are 
     uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 1126 the following new item:

``1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and 
              presentation.''.

       (c) Sense of Congress Regarding Implementation.--It is the 
     sense of Congress that, as soon as practicable once the 
     spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button becomes available, 
     the Secretary of Defense should--
       (1) widely announce the availability of spouse-of-a-combat-
     veteran lapel buttons through military and public information 
     channels; and
       (2) encourage commanders at all levels to conduct 
     ceremonies recognizing the support provided by spouses of 
     members of the Armed Forces and to use the ceremonies as an 
     opportunity for members to present their spouses with a 
     spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button.

     SEC. 552. PROTECTION OF CHILD CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS FOR 
                   PARENTS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Child Custody Protection.--Title II of the 
     Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 208. CHILD CUSTODY PROTECTION.

       ``(a) Restriction on Temporary Custody Order.--If a court 
     renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a 
     child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment 
     of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall 
     require that, upon the return of the servicemember from 
     deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately 
     preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the 
     court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best 
     interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be 
     subject to subsection (b).
       ``(b) Limitation on Consideration of Member's Deployment in 
     Determination of Child's Best Interest.--If a motion or a 
     petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the 
     custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may 
     consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of 
     deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole 
     factor in determining the best interest of the child.
       ``(c) No Federal Jurisdiction or Right of Action or 
     Removal.--Nothing in this section shall create a Federal 
     right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal 
     jurisdiction or create a right of removal.
       ``(d) Preemption.--In any case where State law applicable 
     to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as 
     contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of 
     protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying 
     servicemember than the rights provided under this section 
     with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court 
     shall apply the higher State standard.
       ``(e) Deployment Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `deployment' means the movement or mobilization of a 
     servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 
     days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or 
     permanent official orders--
       ``(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;
       ``(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or
       ``(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family 
     members to that location.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 
     1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items 
     relating to title II the following new item:

``208. Child custody protection.''.

     SEC. 553. TREATMENT OF RELOCATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES FOR ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSES OF MORTGAGE 
                   REFINANCING.

       (a) In General.--Title III of the Servicemembers Civil 
     Relief Act is amended by inserting after section 303 (50 
     U.S.C. App. 533) the following new section:

[[Page 8927]]



     ``SEC. 303A. TREATMENT OF RELOCATION OF SERVICEMEMBERS FOR 
                   ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSES OF MORTGAGE 
                   REFINANCING.

       ``(a) Treatment of Absence From Residence Due to Active 
     Duty.--While a servicemember who is the mortgagor under an 
     existing mortgage does not reside in the residence that 
     secures the existing mortgage because of a relocation 
     described in subsection (c)(1)(B), if the servicemember 
     inquires about or applies for a covered refinancing mortgage, 
     the servicemember shall be considered, for all purposes 
     relating to the covered refinancing mortgage (including such 
     inquiry or application and eligibility for, and compliance 
     with, any underwriting criteria and standards regarding such 
     covered refinancing mortgage) to occupy the residence that 
     secures the existing mortgage to be paid or prepaid by such 
     covered refinancing mortgage as the principal residence of 
     the servicemember during the period of such relocation.
       ``(b) Limitation.--Subsection (a) shall not apply with 
     respect to a servicemember who inquires about or applies for 
     a covered refinancing mortgage if, during the 5-year period 
     preceding the date of such inquiry or application, the 
     servicemember entered into a covered refinancing mortgage 
     pursuant to this section.
       ``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) Existing mortgage.--The term `existing mortgage' 
     means a mortgage that is secured by a 1- to 4-family 
     residence, including a condominium or a share in a 
     cooperative ownership housing association, that was the 
     principal residence of a servicemember for a period that--
       ``(A) had a duration of 13 consecutive months or longer; 
     and
       ``(B) ended upon the relocation of the servicemember caused 
     by the servicemember receiving military orders for a 
     permanent change of station or to deploy with a military 
     unit, or as an individual in support of a military operation, 
     for a period of not less than 18 months that did not allow 
     the servicemember to continue to occupy such residence as a 
     principal residence.
       ``(2) Covered refinancing mortgage.--The term `covered 
     refinancing mortgage' means any mortgage that--
       ``(A) is made for the purpose of paying or prepaying, and 
     extinguishing, the outstanding obligations under an existing 
     mortgage or mortgages; and
       ``(B) is secured by the same residence that secured such 
     existing mortgage or mortgages.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 
     1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item 
     relating to section 303 the following new item:

``303A. Treatment of relocation of servicemembers for active duty for 
              purposes of mortgage refinancing.''.

     SEC. 554. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR IMMEDIATE FAMILY 
                   MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ASSIGNED 
                   TO SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES.

       (a) Pilot Programs Authorized.--Consistent with such 
     regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to 
     carry out this section, the Commander of the United States 
     Special Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot 
     programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing 
     family support activities for the immediate family members of 
     members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations 
     forces.
       (b) Selection of Programs.--In selecting the pilot programs 
     to be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall--
       (1) identify family support activities that have a direct 
     and concrete impact on the readiness of special operations 
     forces, but that are not being provided to the immediate 
     family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to 
     special operations forces by the Secretary of a military 
     department; and
       (2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family support 
     activity proposed to be included in a pilot program.
       (c) Evaluation.--The Commander shall develop outcome 
     measurements to evaluate the success of each family support 
     activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a).
       (d) Additional Authority.--The Commander may expend up to 
     $5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection 
     (f) to carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a).
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``Commander'' means the Commander of the 
     United States Special Operations Command.
       (2) The term ``immediate family members'' has the meaning 
     given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10, United States 
     Code.
       (3) The term ``special operations forces'' means those 
     forces of the Armed Forces identified as special operations 
     forces under section 167(i) of such title.
       (f) Duration of Pilot Program Authority.--The authority 
     provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander 
     during fiscal years 2014 through 2016.
       (g) Report.--Not later than 180 days after completing a 
     pilot program under subsection (a), the Commander shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     describing the results of the pilot program.

     Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness

     SEC. 561. INCLUSION OF FREELY ASSOCIATED STATES WITHIN SCOPE 
                   OF JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS 
                   PROGRAM.

       Section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) If a secondary educational institution in the 
     Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall 
     Islands, or the Republic of Palau otherwise meets the 
     conditions imposed by subsection (b) on the establishment and 
     maintenance of units of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training 
     Corps, the Secretary of a military department may establish 
     and maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training 
     Corps at the secondary educational institution even though 
     the secondary educational institution is not a United States 
     secondary educational institution.''.

     SEC. 562. IMPROVED CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS AND DISSEMINATION AND 
                   TRACKING OF RESULTS.

       (a) Improved Dissemination of Results in Chain of 
     Command.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the 
     results of command climate assessments are provided to the 
     relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of 
     command.
       (b) Performance Tracking.--
       (1) Evidence of compliance.--The Secretary of each military 
     department shall include in the performance evaluations and 
     assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction 
     of the Secretary a designated form where senior commanders 
     can indicate whether the commander has conducted the required 
     climate assessments.
       (2) Effect of failure to conduct assessment.--If a 
     commander is found to not have conducted the required climate 
     assessments, the failure shall be noted in the commander's 
     performance evaluation and be considered a serious factor 
     during consideration for any subsequent promotion.
       (c) Tracking System.--The Inspector General of the 
     Department of Defense shall develop a system to track whether 
     commanders are conducting command climate assessments.
       (d) Unit Compliance Reports.--Working with the Inspector 
     General of the Department of Defense, unit commanders shall 
     gather all the climate assessments from the unit and develop 
     a compliance report that, at a minimum, shall include the 
     following:
       (1) A comprehensive overview of the concerns members of the 
     unit expressed in the climate assessments.
       (2) Data showing how leadership is perceived in the unit.
       (3) A detailed strategic plan on how leadership plans to 
     address the expressed concerns.

     SEC. 563. SERVICE-WIDE 360 ASSESSMENTS.

       (a) Adoption of 360-degree Approach.--The Secretary of each 
     military department shall develop an assessment program 
     modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source 
     Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) Program, known in this section 
     as the ``360-degree approach''.
       (b) Report on Inclusion in Performance Evaluation 
     Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to Congress a report containing the results of an assessment 
     of the feasibility of including the 360-degree approach as 
     part of the performance evaluation reports.
       (c) Individual Counseling.--The Secretary of each military 
     department shall include individual counseling as part of the 
     performance evaluation process.

     SEC. 564. HEALTH WELFARE INSPECTIONS.

       The Secretary of each military department shall conduct 
     health welfare inspections on a monthly basis in order to 
     ensure and maintain security, military readiness, good order, 
     and discipline of all units of the Armed Forces under the 
     jurisdiction of the Secretary. Results of the Health Welfare 
     Inspections shall be provided to both the commander and 
     senior commander.

     SEC. 565. REVIEW OF SECURITY OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, 
                   INCLUDING BARRACKS AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES.

       (a) Review of Security Measures.--The Secretary of Defense 
     shall conduct a review of security measures on United States 
     military installations, specifically with regard to barracks 
     and multi-family residences on military installations, for 
     the purpose of ensuring the safety of members of the Armed 
     Forces and their dependents who reside on military 
     installations.
       (b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the review under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall--
       (1) identify security gaps on military installations; and
       (2) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using 24-
     hour electronic monitoring or placing security personnel at 
     all points of entry into barracks and multi-family residences 
     on military installation.
       (c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 90 days after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the 
     results of the study conducted under subsection (a), 
     including an estimate of the costs--
       (1) to eliminate all security gaps identified under 
     subsection (b)(1); and
       (2) to provide 24-hour security monitoring as evaluated 
     under subsection (b)(2).

     SEC. 566. ENHANCEMENT OF MECHANISMS TO CORRELATE SKILLS AND 
                   TRAINING FOR MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES 
                   WITH SKILLS AND TRAINING REQUIRED FOR CIVILIAN 
                   CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES.

       (a) Improvement of Information Available to Members of the 
     Armed Forces About Correlation.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretaries of the military 
     departments, in coordination with the

[[Page 8928]]

     Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 
     shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make information on 
     civilian credentialing opportunities available to members of 
     the Armed Forces beginning with, and at every stage of, 
     training of members for military occupational specialties, in 
     order to permit members--
       (A) to evaluate the extent to which such training 
     correlates with the skills and training required in 
     connection with various civilian certifications and licenses; 
     and
       (B) to assess the suitability of such training for 
     obtaining or pursuing such civilian certifications and 
     licenses.
       (2) Coordination with transition goals plans success 
     program.--Information shall be made available under paragraph 
     (1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals Plans 
     Success (GPS) program.
       (3) Types of information.--The information made available 
     under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited to, the 
     following:
       (A) Information on the civilian occupational equivalents of 
     military occupational specialties (MOS).
       (B) Information on civilian license or certification 
     requirements, including examination requirements.
       (C) Information on the availability and opportunities for 
     use of educational benefits available to members of the Armed 
     Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, or continuing 
     education that leads to a certification exam in order to 
     provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities.
       (4) Use and adaptation of certain programs.--In making 
     information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of 
     the military departments may use and adapt appropriate 
     portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-Line (COOL) 
     programs of the Army and the Navy and the Credentialing and 
     Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the Air Force.
       (b) Improvement of Access of Accredited Civilian 
     Credentialing Agencies to Military Training Content.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretaries of the military 
     departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of 
     Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum 
     extent practicable consistent with national security 
     requirements, make available to accredited civilian 
     credentialing agencies that issue certifications or licenses, 
     upon request of such agencies, information such as military 
     course training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of 
     military advancement attained, and professional skills 
     developed.
       (2) Central repository.--The actions taken pursuant to 
     paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central 
     repository of information on training and training materials 
     provided members in connection with military occupational 
     specialities that is readily accessible by accredited 
     civilian credentialing agencies described in that paragraph 
     in order to meet requests described in that paragraph.

     SEC. 567. USE OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR COURSES IN 
                   PURSUIT OF CIVILIAN CERTIFICATIONS OR LICENSES.

       (a) Courses Under Department of Defense Educational 
     Assistance Authorities.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 101 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 2015 the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of 
       educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian 
       certifications or licenses

       ``(a) Limitation on Use of Assistance.--In the case of a 
     member of the armed forces who is enrolled in an educational 
     institution in a State for purposes of obtaining employment 
     in an occupation or profession requiring the approval or 
     licensure of a board or agency of that State, educational 
     assistance specified in subsection (b) may be used by the 
     member for a course offered by the educational institution 
     that is a required element of the curriculum to be satisfied 
     to obtain employment in that occupation or profession only 
     if--
       ``(1) the successful completion of the curriculum fully 
     qualifies a student to--
       ``(A) take any examination required for entry into the 
     occupation or profession, including satisfying any State or 
     professionally mandated programmatic and specialized 
     accreditation requirements; and
       ``(B) be certified or licensed or meet any other 
     academically related pre-conditions that are required for 
     entry into the occupation or profession; and
       ``(2) in the case of State licensing or professionally 
     mandated requirements for entry into the occupation or 
     profession that require specialized accreditation, the 
     curriculum meets the requirement for specialized 
     accreditation through its accreditation or pre-accreditation 
     by an accrediting agency or association recognized by the 
     Secretary of Education or designated by that State as a 
     reliable authority as to the quality or training offered by 
     the institution in that program.
       ``(b) Covered Educational Assistance.--The educational 
     assistance specified in this subsection is educational 
     assistance as follows:
       ``(1) Educational assistance for members of the armed 
     forces under section 2007 and 2015 of this title.
       ``(2) Educational assistance for persons enlisting for 
     active duty under chapter 106A of this title.
       ``(3) Educational assistance for members of the armed 
     forces held as captives under section 2183 of this title.
       ``(4) Educational assistance for members of the Selected 
     Reserve under chapter 1606 of this title.
       ``(5) Educational assistance for reserve component members 
     supporting contingency operations and other operations under 
     chapter 1607 of this title.
       ``(6) Such other educational assistance provided members of 
     the armed force under the laws the administered by the 
     Secretary of Defense or the Secretaries of the military 
     departments as the Secretary of Defense shall designate for 
     purposes of this section.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by 
     inserting after the item relating to section 2015 the 
     following new item:

``2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of educational 
              assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian 
              certifications or licenses.''.

       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect on August 1, 2014, and shall apply with 
     respect to courses pursued on or after that date.

               Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

     SEC. 571. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL 
                   EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.

       (a) Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of 
     Military Dependent Students.--Of the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and 
     available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide 
     activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, 
     $20,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of 
     providing assistance to local educational agencies under 
     subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-163; 
     20 U.S.C. 7703b).
       (b) Assistance to Schools With Enrollment Changes Due to 
     Base Closures, Force Structure Changes, or Force 
     Relocations.--
       (1) Extension of authority to provide assistance.--Section 
     572(b)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b(b)(4)) is amended by 
     striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30, 
     2015''.
       (2) Amount of assistance authorized.--Of the amount 
     authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 
     301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-
     wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 
     4301, $5,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of 
     providing assistance to local educational agencies under 
     subsection (b) of section 572 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b).
       (c) Local Educational Agency Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``local educational agency'' has the meaning given that 
     term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary 
     Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

     SEC. 572. SUPPORT FOR EFFORTS TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT 
                   AND TRANSITION OF MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.

       The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit 
     organizations that provide services to improve the academic 
     achievement of military dependent students, including those 
     nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the 
     civic responsibility of military dependent students and their 
     understanding of the Federal Government through direct 
     exposure to the operations of the Federal Government.

     SEC. 573. TREATMENT OF TUITION PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR VIRTUAL 
                   ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COMPONENT OF 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM.

       (a) Crediting of Payments.--Section 2164(l) of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new paragraph:
       ``(3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense 
     under this subsection shall be credited to the account 
     designated by the Secretary for the operation of the virtual 
     educational program under this subsection. Payments so 
     credited shall be merged with other funds in the account and 
     shall be available, to the extent provided in advance in 
     appropriation Acts, for the same purposes and the same period 
     as other funds in the account.''.
       (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by 
     subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition 
     payments received under section 2164(l) of title 10, United 
     States Code, for enrollments authorized by such section, 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, in the virtual 
     elementary and secondary education program of the Department 
     of Defense education program.

                   Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

     SEC. 581. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF 
                   MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.

       (a) In General.--Section 704 of title 18, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``wears,''; and
       (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows:
       ``(b) Fraudulent Representations About Receipt of Military 
     Decorations or Medals.--Whoever, with intent to obtain money, 
     property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds 
     oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal 
     described in subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under 
     this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both.''.
       (b) Addition of Certain Other Medals.--Section 704(d) of 
     title 18, United States Code, is amended--

[[Page 8929]]

       (1) by striking ``If a decoration'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--If a decoration'';
       (2) by inserting ``a combat badge,'' after ``1129 of title 
     10,''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) Combat badge defined.--In this subsection, the term 
     `combat badge' means a Combat Infantryman's Badge, Combat 
     Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or 
     Combat Action Medal.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 704 of title 18, United 
     States Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) 
     by striking ``or (b)''.

     SEC. 582. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF MEDALS OF HONOR 
                   THAT MAY BE AWARDED TO THE SAME MEMBER OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Army.--Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by striking ``medal of honor, distinguished-
     service cross,'' and inserting ``distinguished-service 
     cross''.
       (b) Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6247 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended by striking ``medal of 
     honor,''.
       (c) Air Force.--Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by striking ``medal of honor, Air Force 
     cross,'' and inserting ``Air Force Cross''.

     SEC. 583. STANDARDIZATION OF TIME-LIMITS FOR RECOMMENDING AND 
                   AWARDING MEDAL OF HONOR, DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE 
                   CROSS, NAVY CROSS, AIR FORCE CROSS, AND 
                   DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE MEDAL.

       (a) Army.--Section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``three years'' and 
     inserting ``five years''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``two years'' and 
     inserting ``three years''.
       (b) Air Force.--Section 8744(b) of such title is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``three years'' and 
     inserting ``five years''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``two years'' and 
     inserting ``three years''.

     SEC. 584. RECODIFICATION AND REVISION OF ARMY, NAVY, AIR 
                   FORCE, AND COAST GUARD MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL 
                   REQUIREMENTS.

       (a) Automatic Enrollment and Furnishing of Certificate.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 57 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 1134 the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and 
       Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll

       ``(a) Establishment.--There shall be in the Department of 
     the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the 
     Air Force, and the Department in which the Coast Guard is 
     operating a roll designated as the `Army, Navy, Air Force, 
     and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll'.
       ``(b) Enrollment.--The Secretary concerned shall enter and 
     record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of 
     Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active 
     duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of 
     honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title 
     or section 491 of title 14.
       ``(c) Issuance of Enrollment Certificate.--Each living 
     person whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, 
     and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a 
     certificate of enrollment on the roll.
       ``(d) Entitlement to Special Pension; Notice to Secretary 
     of Veterans Affairs.--The Secretary concerned shall deliver 
     to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each 
     certificate of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The 
     copy of the certificate shall authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay the special pension provided by 
     section 1562 of title 38 to the person named in the 
     certificate.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 1134 the following new item:

``1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal 
              of Honor Roll.''.

       (b) Special Pension.--
       (1) Automatic entitlement.--Subsection (a) of section 1562 
     of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
       (A) by striking ``each person'' and inserting ``each living 
     person'';
       (B) by striking ``Honor roll'' and inserting ``Honor 
     Roll'';
       (C) by striking ``subsection (c) of section 1561 of this 
     title'' and inserting ``subsection (d) of section 1134a of 
     title 10''; and
       (D) by striking ``date of application therefor under 
     section 1560 of this title'' and inserting ``date on which 
     the person's name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, 
     and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection (b) of 
     such section''.
       (2) Election to decline special pension.--Such section is 
     further amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(g)(1) A person who is entitled to special pension under 
     subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by 
     notifying the Secretary of such election in writing.
       ``(2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under 
     paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary 
     shall cease payments of special pension to the person.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendments.--
       (1) Repeal of recodified provisions.--Sections 1560 and 
     1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed.
       (2) Clerical amendments.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking 
     the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561.
       (d) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this 
     section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded 
     on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 585. TREATMENT OF VICTIMS OF THE ATTACKS AT RECRUITING 
                   STATION IN LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AND AT FORT 
                   HOOD, TEXAS.

       (a) Award of Purple Heart Required.--The Secretary of the 
     military department concerned shall award the Purple Heart to 
     the members of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded in 
     the attacks that occurred at the recruiting station in Little 
     Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas, on 
     November 5, 2009.
       (b) Exception.--This section shall not apply to a member of 
     the Armed Forces whose death or wound in an attack described 
     in subsection (a) was the result of the willful misconduct of 
     the member.

     SEC. 586. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

       (a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of 
     the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of 
     the Army Letter 600-05-1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person 
     who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat 
     during which the person personally engaged, or was personally 
     engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning 
     on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the 
     date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity 
     for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary 
     determines that the person has not been previously recognized 
     in an appropriate manner for such participation.
       (b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action 
     Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action 
     Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge 
     directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least 
     substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to 
     carry out this section.

     SEC. 587. REPORT ON NAVY REVIEW, FINDINGS, AND ACTIONS 
                   PERTAINING TO MEDAL OF HONOR NOMINATION OF 
                   MARINE CORPS SERGEANT RAFAEL PERALTA.

       Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 
     Representatives a report describing the Navy review, 
     findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor 
     nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The 
     report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard 
     to the case.

     SEC. 588. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED-
                   SERVICE CROSS TO SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ROBERT F. 
                   KEISER FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE KOREAN WAR.

       (a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations 
     specified in section 3144 of title 10, United States Code, or 
     any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of 
     certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the 
     Secretary of the Army is authorized and requested to award 
     the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such 
     title to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for the acts 
     of valor referred to in subsection (b) during the Korean War.
       (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to 
     in subsection (a) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser's on 
     November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d Military Police 
     Company, 2d Infantry Division, United States Army, during the 
     Division's successful withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon 
     Pass.

                       Subtitle I--Other Matters

     SEC. 591. REVISION OF SPECIFIED SENIOR MILITARY COLLEGES TO 
                   REFLECT CONSOLIDATION OF NORTH GEORGIA COLLEGE 
                   AND STATE UNIVERSITY AND GAINESVILLE STATE 
                   COLLEGE.

       Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(6) The University of North Georgia.''.

     SEC. 592. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONCESSIONS CONTRACTS AT 
                   ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 446 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     section:

     ``Sec. 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts

       ``(a) Contracts Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the 
     provision of transportation, interpretative, or other 
     necessary or appropriate concession services to visitors at 
     the Army National Military Cemeteries.
       ``(b) Special Requirements.--(1) The Secretary of the Army 
     shall establish and include in each concession contract such 
     requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to 
     ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery 
     at which services are provided under the contract.
       ``(2) A concession contract shall not include operation of 
     the gift shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the 
     specific prior authorization by an Act of Congress.
       ``(c) Term of Contracts.--(1) Except as provided in 
     paragraph (2), a concession contract

[[Page 8930]]

     may be awarded for a period of not more than 10 years.
       ``(2)(A) If the Secretary of the Army determines that the 
     terms and conditions of a concession contract to be entered 
     into under this section, including any required construction 
     of capital improvements, warrant entering into the contract 
     for a period of greater than 10 years, the Secretary may 
     award the contract for a period of up to 20 years.
       ``(B) If a concession contract is intended solely for the 
     provision of transportation services, the Secretary may enter 
     into the contract for a period of not more than five years 
     and may extend the period of the contract for one or more 
     successive five-year periods pursuant to an option included 
     in the contract or a modification of the contract. The 
     aggregate period of any such contract, including extensions, 
     may not exceed 10 years.
       ``(d) Franchise Fees.--A concession contract shall provide 
     for payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such 
     other monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary 
     of the Army. The Secretary shall ensure that the objective of 
     generating revenue for the United States is subordinate to 
     the objectives of honoring the service and sacrifices of the 
     deceased members of the armed forces and of providing 
     necessary and appropriate services for visitors to the 
     Cemeteries at reasonable rates.
       ``(e) Special Account.--All franchise fees (and other 
     monetary consideration) collected by the United States under 
     subsection (d) shall be deposited into a special account 
     established in the Treasury of the United States. The funds 
     deposited in such account shall be available for expenditure 
     by the Secretary of the Army, to the extent authorized and in 
     such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations 
     Acts, to support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds 
     deposited into the account shall remain available until 
     expended.
       ``(f) Concession Contract Defined.--In this section, the 
     term `concession contract' means a contract authorized and 
     entered into under this section.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``4727. Cemetery concessions contracts.''.

     SEC. 593. COMMISSION ON MILITARY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND 
                   DISCIPLINARY ISSUES.

       (a) Establishment of Commission.--There is established the 
     Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary 
     Issues (in this section referred to as the ``Commission'').
       (b) Membership.--
       (1) Composition.--The Commission shall be composed of 10 
     members, of whom--
       (A) two shall be appointed by the President;
       (B) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee 
     on Armed Services of the Senate;
       (C) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
       (D) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee 
     on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
       (E) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
       (2) Appointment date.--The appointments of the members of 
     the Commission shall be made not later than 30 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act. If one or more 
     appointments under a subparagraph of paragraph (1) is not 
     made by such appointment date, the authority to make such 
     appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of 
     members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number 
     equal to the number of appointments not made.
       (3) Expertise.--In making appointments under this 
     subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with 
     expertise in service-connected mental disorders, post-
     traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury 
     (TBI), psychiatry, behavioral health, neurology, as well as 
     disciplinary matters and military justice.
       (4) Period of appointment; vacancies.--Members shall be 
     appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the 
     Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled 
     in the same manner as the original appointment.
       (5) Initial meeting.--Not later than 30 days after the 
     appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the Commission 
     shall hold its first meeting.
       (6) Meetings.--The Commission shall meet at the call of the 
     Chair. A majority of the members of the Commission shall 
     constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold 
     hearings.
       (7) Chair and vice chairman.--The Commission shall select a 
     Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
       (c) Study and Report.--
       (1) Study required.--The Commission shall undertake a 
     comprehensive study of whether--
       (A) the Department of Defense mechanisms for disciplinary 
     action adequately address the impact of service-connected 
     mental disorders and TBI on the basis for the disciplinary 
     action; and
       (B) whether the disciplinary mechanisms should be revisited 
     in light of new information regarding the connection between 
     service-connected mental disorders and TBI, behavioral 
     problems, and disciplinary action.
       (2) Considerations.--In considering the Department of 
     Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action, the Commission 
     shall give particular consideration to evaluating a structure 
     that examines those members diagnosed with or reasonably 
     asserting post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain 
     injury that have been deployed overseas in support of a 
     contingency operation during the previous 24 months and how 
     that injury or deployment may constitute matters in 
     extenuation that relate to the basis for administrative 
     separation under conditions other than honorable or the 
     overall characterization of service of the member as other 
     than honorable.
       (3) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2014, the Commission 
     shall submit to the President and the congressional defense 
     committees a report containing a detailed statement of the 
     findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the 
     study required by this subsection, together with its 
     recommendations for such legislation and administrative 
     actions it may consider appropriate in light of the results 
     of the study.
       (d) Powers of the Commission.--
       (1) Hearings.--The Commission may hold such hearings, sit 
     and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and 
     receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable 
     to carry out this section.
       (2) Information from federal agencies.--The Commission may 
     secure directly from any Federal department or agency such 
     information as the Commission considers necessary to carry 
     out this section. Upon request of the Chair of the 
     Commission, the head of such department or agency shall 
     furnish such information to the Commission.
       (e) Commission Personnel Matters.--
       (1) Compensation of members.--All members of the Commission 
     who are officers or employees of the United States shall 
     serve without compensation in addition to that received for 
     their services as officers or employees of the United States.
       (2) Travel expenses.--The members of the Commission shall 
     be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of 
     subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies 
     under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States 
     Code, while away from their homes or regular places of 
     business in the performance of services for the Commission.
       (3) Staff.--The Chair of the Commission may, without regard 
     to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and 
     terminate an executive director and such other additional 
     personnel from as may be necessary to enable the Commission 
     to perform its duties. The employment of an executive 
     director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission. 
     The staff members should be officers or employees of the 
     United States.
       (f) Termination Date.--The Commission shall terminate 30 
     days after the date on which the Commission submits its 
     report.

     SEC. 594. COMMISSION ON SERVICE TO THE NATION.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established a commission to be 
     known as the ``Commission on Service to the Nation''.
       (b) Duties.--
       (1) Study.--The Commission shall carry out a study of the 
     following:
       (A) The effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and 
     conflicts, on members of the Armed Forces, the families of 
     members, and the communities of members.
       (B) The outgoing experience and transition between military 
     and civilian life.
       (C) The gaps between the military and those Americans who 
     do not participate directly in the military community.
       (2) Testimony and research.--In carrying out the study 
     under paragraph (1), the Commission shall--
       (A) hear testimony from all aspects of military and 
     civilian life, including public, private, individual and 
     institutional stakeholders, with personal testimony, expert 
     testimony, academic testimony, as well as testimony from 
     association and community leaders, and other testimony as 
     appropriate;
       (B) hear and accept testimony in an open and public manner, 
     accepting testimony in a wide variety of ways for each 
     hearing, including submissions made through a public internet 
     website, and testimony heard remotely if appropriate;
       (C) retain the records of all hearings and artifacts of 
     testimony for the purposes of historical documentation and 
     research;
       (D) assess the social, mental, and physical effects of war 
     on active members of the Armed Forces, the families of 
     members, and the communities of members and the preparation 
     they receive for transitioning out of the military; and
       (E) assess the existing academic and social science 
     research and analysis on transition from active military to 
     civilian life.
       (3) Recommendations.--The Commission shall make 
     recommendations, based on the analyses in subparagraphs (A) 
     through (C) of paragraph (1), on how to better--
       (A) support the transition to civilian life of a member of 
     the Armed Forces;
       (B) support the families and communities of the member; and
       (C) better connect the military community and civilians.
       (4) Website.--The Commission shall maintain an Internet 
     website available to the public to--
       (A) share the schedule of the Commission;
       (B) notify the public of events;
       (C) accept feedback; and
       (D) post records of events and other information to inform 
     the public in a manner consistent with the mission of the 
     Commission.
       (c) Composition.--
       (1) Members.--The Commission shall be composed of 15 
     members appointed as follows:
       (A) Four members appointed by Majority Leader of the 
     Senate, in consultation with the chairman of the Committee on 
     Armed Services of the Senate.

[[Page 8931]]

       (B) Four members appointed by the Speaker of the House of 
     Representatives, in consultation with the chairman of the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
       (C) Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the 
     Senate, in consultation with the ranking minority member of 
     the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.
       (D) Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the 
     House of Representatives, in consultation with the ranking 
     minority member of the Committee on Armed Service of the 
     House of Representatives.
       (E) Three members appointed by the President.
       (2) Qualifications.--The members of the Commission shall be 
     appointed from among persons who have knowledge and expertise 
     in the following areas:
       (A) The effects of war on members of the Armed Forces, 
     their families, and society.
       (B) The process of transitioning out of the Armed Forces.
       (C) The resources available to members and their families 
     as members transition out of the Armed Forces and into 
     society.
       (D) Personnel benefits, including healthcare and job 
     training, available to members.
       (E) Policy making and policy analysis.
       (3) Service requirement.--Not less than one member of the 
     Commission appointed under each of subparagraphs (A) through 
     (E) of paragraph (1) shall have served in the Armed Forces.
       (4) Duration and vacancies.--Members of the Commission 
     shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. A vacancy 
     in the membership of the Commission shall not affect the 
     powers of the Commission, but shall be filled in the same 
     manner as the original appointment.
       (5) Chairman.--The President shall designate a member of 
     the Commission to serve as chairman of the Commission.
       (6) Deadline for appointment.--The members shall be 
     appointed by not later than 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act
       (d) Procedures.--
       (1) Initial meeting.--The Commission shall hold its initial 
     meeting not later than 30 days after the date on which all 
     members of the Commission have been appointed.
       (2) Meetings.--After the initial meeting under paragraph 
     (1), the Commission shall meet at the call of the chairman.
       (3) Quorum.--Four members of the Commission shall 
     constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold 
     hearings.
       (4) Procedure.--The Commission shall act by resolution 
     agreed to by a majority of the members of the Commission.
       (5) Panels.--The Commission may establish panels composed 
     of less than the full membership of the Commission for the 
     purpose of carrying out the Commission's duties. The actions 
     of each such panel shall be subject to the review and control 
     of the Commission. Any findings and determinations made by 
     such a panel shall not be considered the findings and 
     determinations of the Commission unless approved by the 
     Commission.
       (e) Compensation and Staff.--
       (1) Pay.--Each member of the Commission shall be paid at a 
     rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of 
     basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule 
     under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code, for each 
     day (including travel time) during which the member is 
     engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. 
     All members of the Commission who are officers or employees 
     of the United States shall serve without pay in addition to 
     that received for their services as officers or employees of 
     the United States.
       (2) Travel expenses.--The members of the Commission shall 
     be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of 
     subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies 
     under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States 
     Code, while away from their homes or regular places of 
     business in the performance of services for the Commission.
       (3) Executive director.--The Commission shall appoint and 
     fix the rate of basic pay for an Executive Director in 
     accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
       (4) Staff.--The Executive Director, with the approval of 
     the Commission, may appoint and fix the rate of basic pay for 
     additional personnel as staff of the Commission in accordance 
     with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
       (5) Detail of government employees.--Upon request of the 
     chairman of the Commission, the head of any Federal 
     department or agency may detail, on a nonreimbursable basis, 
     any personnel of that department or agency to the Commission 
     to assist it in carrying out its duties.
       (f) Powers.--
       (1) Hearings.--For the purpose of carrying out this Act, 
     the Commission (or on the authority of the Commission, any 
     subcommittee or member) may hold such hearings and forums, 
     and sit and act at such times and places, take such 
     testimony, receive such evidence, and administer such oaths 
     as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission shall 
     hold not less than one hearing in each State and the District 
     of Columbia, and may hold hearings and forums in any 
     commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States 
     as the Commission determines appropriate.
       (2) Information from federal agencies.--The Commission, or 
     designated staff member, may secure directly from any 
     department or agency of the United States information 
     necessary to enable it to carry out this Act. Upon request of 
     the chairman of the Commission, the chairman of any 
     subcommittee created by a majority of the Commission, or any 
     member designated by a majority of the Commission, the head 
     of that department or agency shall furnish that information 
     to the Commission.
       (3) Miscellaneous administrative and support services.--The 
     Secretary of Defense shall furnish the Commission, on a 
     reimbursable basis, any administrative and support services 
     requested by the Commission.
       (4) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services.--
     The chairman of the Commission may procure temporary and 
     intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, 
     United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not 
     exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay 
     payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 
     5316 of such title.
       (5) Gifts.--The Commission may accept, use, and dispose of 
     gifts, bequests, or devises of services or property, both 
     real and personal, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating 
     the work of the Commission. Gifts, bequests, or devises of 
     money and proceeds from sales of other property received as 
     gifts, bequests, or devises shall be deposited in the 
     Treasury and shall be available for disbursement upon order 
     of the chairman, vice chairman, or designee.
       (g) Reports.--
       (1) Initial report.--Not later than 90 days after the 
     initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall 
     submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives, and release to the public, a report setting 
     forth--
       (A) a strategic plan for the work of the Commission;
       (B) a discussion of the activities of the Commission; and
       (C) any initial findings of the Commission.
       (2) Final report.--Not later than 18 months after the 
     initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall 
     submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives, and release to the public, a final report. 
     Such report shall include any recommendations developed under 
     subsection (b)(3) that the Commission determines appropriate, 
     including any recommended legislation, policies, regulations, 
     directives, and practices.
       (h) Termination.--The Commission shall terminate 90 days 
     after the date on which the final report is submitted under 
     subsection (g)(2).

          TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

                     Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

     SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY 
                   INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR 
                   HOUSING UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

       Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2014''.

           Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

     SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2014'':
       (1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve 
     reenlistment bonus.
       (2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve 
     affiliation or enlistment bonus.
       (3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted 
     members assigned to certain high-priority units.
       (4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve 
     enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
       (5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 
     and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
       (6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve 
     enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior 
     service.
       (7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel 
     expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal 
     commuting distance.
       (8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments 
     for reserve component members experiencing extended and 
     frequent mobilization for active duty service.

     SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS.

       (a) Title 10 Authorities.--The following sections of title 
     10, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December 
     31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'':
       (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer 
     candidate accession program.
       (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education 
     loans for certain health professionals who serve in the 
     Selected Reserve.
       (b) Title 37 Authorities.--The following sections of title 
     37, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December 
     31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014'':
       (1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention 
     bonuses for psychologists.
       (2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for 
     registered nurses.
       (3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay 
     for nurse anesthetists.
       (4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected 
     Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime 
     specialties.
       (5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for 
     dental officers.
       (6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for 
     pharmacy officers.
       (7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for 
     medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.

[[Page 8932]]

       (8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental 
     specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

     SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2014'':
       (1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-
     qualified officers extending period of active service.
       (2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession 
     bonus.
       (3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual 
     incentive bonus.

     SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 
                   37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND 
                   BONUS AUTHORITIES.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2014'':
       (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for 
     enlisted members.
       (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for 
     officers.
       (3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive 
     pay authorities for nuclear officers.
       (4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive 
     pay and bonus authorities for officers.
       (5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive 
     pay authorities for officers in health professions.
       (6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
       (7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special 
     duty pay.
       (8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or 
     proficiency bonus.
       (9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for 
     members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to 
     high priority units.

     SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO 
                   PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL 
                   PAYS.

       The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
     amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2014'':
       (1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention 
     bonus.
       (2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
       (3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for 
     active members.
       (4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
       (5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new 
     officers in critical skills.
       (6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for 
     conversion to military occupational specialty to ease 
     personnel shortage.
       (7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for 
     transfer between armed forces.
       (8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer 
     candidates.

     SEC. 616. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE 
                   INCENTIVE PAY FOR MEMBERS OF PRECOMMISSIONING 
                   PROGRAMS PURSUING FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY.

       Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended 
     by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 
     31, 2014''.

     SEC. 617. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE BONUS TO CERTAIN CADETS AND 
                   MIDSHIPMEN ENROLLED IN THE SENIOR RESERVE 
                   OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS.

       (a) Bonus Authorized.--Chapter 5 of title 37, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following 
     new section:

     ``Sec. 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen 
       enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps

       ``(a) Contracting Bonus Authorized.--The Secretary 
     concerned may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or 
     midshipman enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training 
     Corps who executes a written agreement described in 
     subsection (c).
       ``(b) Amount of Bonus.--The amount of a bonus under 
     subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000.
       ``(c) Agreement.--A written agreement referred to in 
     subsection (a) is a written agreement by the cadet or 
     midshipman--
       ``(1) to complete field training or a practice cruise under 
     section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10;
       ``(2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103 of 
     title 10;
       ``(3) to accept a commission or appointment as an officer 
     of the armed forces; and
       ``(4) to serve on active duty.
       ``(d) Payment Method.--Upon acceptance of a written 
     agreement under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned, 
     the total amount of the bonus payable under the agreement 
     becomes fixed. The agreement shall specify when the bonus 
     will be paid and whether the bonus will be paid in a lump sum 
     or in installments.
       ``(e) Repayment.--A person who, having received all or part 
     of a bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms 
     of the written agreement required by such subsection for 
     receipt of the bonus shall be subject to the repayment 
     provisions of section 373 of this title.
       ``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary concerned shall issue 
     such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this 
     section.
       ``(g) Termination of Authority.--No agreement under this 
     section may be entered into after December 31, 2015.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 335 the following new item:

``336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the 
              Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.''.

    Subtitle C--Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional 
                                Benefits

     SEC. 621. TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS FOR 
                   DEPENDENTS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR 
                   VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY 
                   JUSTICE.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 1059 the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for 
       Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses: transitional 
       compensation; commissary and exchange benefits

       ``(a) Authority To Pay Compensation.--The Secretary of 
     Defense, with respect to the armed forces (other than the 
     Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the 
     Navy), and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect 
     to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in 
     the Navy, may each establish a program under which the 
     Secretary may pay monthly transitional compensation in 
     accordance with this section to dependents or former 
     dependents of a member of the armed forces described in 
     subsection (b) who is under the jurisdiction of the 
     Secretary.
       ``(b) Members and Punitive Actions Covered.--This section 
     applies in the case of a member of the armed forces who, 
     after completing more than 20 years of active service or more 
     than 20 years of service computed under section 12732 of this 
     title--
       ``(1) is convicted by court-martial of an offense under 
     chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military 
     Justice);
       ``(2) is separated from active duty pursuant to the 
     sentence of the court-martial; and
       ``(3) forfeits all pay and allowances pursuant to the 
     sentence of the court-martial.
       ``(c) Recipient of Payments.--(1) In the case of a member 
     of the armed forces described in subsection (b), the 
     Secretary may pay compensation under this section to 
     dependents or former dependents of the member as follows:
       ``(A) If the member was married at the time of the 
     commission of the offense resulting in separation from the 
     armed forces, such compensation may be paid to the spouse or 
     former spouse to whom the member was married at that time, 
     including an amount for each, if any, dependent child of the 
     member who resides in the same household as that spouse or 
     former spouse.
       ``(B) If there is a spouse or former spouse who is or, but 
     for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible for compensation 
     under this section and if there is a dependent child of the 
     member who does not reside in the same household as that 
     spouse or former spouse, compensation under this section may 
     be paid to each such dependent child of the member who does 
     not reside in that household.
       ``(C) If there is no spouse or former spouse who is or, but 
     for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible under this section, 
     compensation under this section may be paid to the dependent 
     children of the member.
       ``(2) A dependent or former dependent of a member described 
     in subsection (b) is not eligible for transitional 
     compensation under this section if the Secretary concerned 
     determines (under regulations prescribed under subsection 
     (g)) that the dependent or former dependent was an active 
     participant in the conduct constituting the offense under 
     chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military 
     Justice) for which the member was convicted and separated 
     from the armed forces.
       ``(d) Commencement and Duration of Payment.--(1) If 
     provided under this section, the payment of transitional 
     compensation under this section shall commence--
       ``(A) as of the date the court-martial sentence is adjudged 
     if the sentence, as adjudged, includes--
       ``(i) a dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct 
     discharge; and
       ``(ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances; or
       ``(B) if there is a pretrial agreement that provides for 
     disapproval or suspension of the dismissal, dishonorable 
     discharge, bad conduct discharge, or forfeiture of all pay 
     and allowances, as of the date of the approval of the court-
     martial sentence by the person acting under section 860(c) of 
     this title (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military 
     Justice) if the sentence, as approved, includes--
       ``(i) an unsuspended dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or 
     bad conduct discharge; and
       ``(ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
       ``(2) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (e), paragraphs 
     (1) and (2) of subsection (g), and subsections (f) and (h) of 
     section 1059 of this title shall apply in determining--
       ``(A) the amount of transitional compensation to be paid 
     under this section;
       ``(B) the period for which such compensation may be paid; 
     and
       ``(C) the circumstances under which the payment of such 
     compensation may or will cease.
       ``(e) Commissary and Exchange Benefits.--A dependent or 
     former dependent who receives transitional compensation under 
     this section shall, while receiving such payments, be 
     entitled to use commissary and exchange stores in the same 
     manner as provided in subsection (j) of section 1059 of this 
     title.
       ``(f) Coordination of Benefits.--The Secretary concerned 
     may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both 
     this section and section 1059 or 1408(h)(1) of this title. In 
     the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order 
     provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to section 
     1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers 
     payments

[[Page 8933]]

     under this section or section 1059, the spouse or former 
     spouse shall elect which payments to receive.
       ``(g) Regulations.--If the Secretary of Defense (or the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast 
     Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) 
     establishes a program to provide transitional compensation 
     under this section, that Secretary shall prescribe 
     regulations to carry out the program.
       ``(h) Dependent Child Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `dependent child', with respect to a member or former member 
     of the armed forces referred to in subsection (b), has the 
     meaning given such term in subsection (l) of section 1059 of 
     this title, except that status as a `dependent child' shall 
     be determined as of the date on which the member described in 
     subsection (b) is convicted of the offense concerned.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting 
     after the item relating to section 1059 the following new 
     item:

``1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for Uniform Code of 
              Military Justice offenses: transitional compensation; 
              commissary and exchange benefits.''.

       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (i) of section 1059 
     of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as 
     follows:
       ``(i) Coordination of Benefits.--The Secretary concerned 
     may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both 
     this section and section 1059a or 1408(h)(1) of this title. 
     In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court 
     order provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to 
     section 1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary 
     offers payments under this section or section 1059a, the 
     spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to 
     receive.''.

     SEC. 622. PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSION FOR MEMBERS 
                   WHOSE RETIRED PAY IS COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE 
                   AVERAGE.

       (a) Clarification of Rule for Members Who Became Members on 
     or After September 8, 1980.--Section 1401a(f)(1) of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, the monthly retired pay of a member or a former member 
     of an armed force'' and inserting the following:
       ``(A) Members with retired pay computed using final basic 
     pay.--The monthly retired pay of a member or former member of 
     an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed 
     service before September 8, 1980, and''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(B) Members with retired pay computed using high-three.--
     Subject to subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay 
     of a member or former member of an armed force who first 
     became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 
     8, 1980, may not be less, on the date on which the member or 
     former member initially becomes entitled to such pay, than 
     the monthly retired pay to which the member or former member 
     would be entitled on that date if the member or former member 
     had become entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, 
     adjusted to reflect any applicable increases in such pay 
     under this section. However, in the case of a member or 
     former member whose retired pay is computed subject to 
     section 1407(f) of this title, subparagraph (A) (rather than 
     the preceding sentence) shall apply in the same manner as if 
     the member or former member first became a member of a 
     uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but only with 
     respect to a calculation as of the date on which the member 
     or former member first became entitled to retired pay.''.
       (b) Applicability.--Subparagraph (B) of section 1401a(f)(1) 
     of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection 
     (a)(2), applies to the computation of retired pay or retainer 
     pay of any member or former member of an Armed Force who 
     first became a member of a uniformed service on or after 
     September 8, 1980, regardless of the date on which the member 
     first becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay.

    Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 
                        Benefits and Operations

     SEC. 631. EXPANSION OF PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES OF 
                   NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES FROM 
                   REPRISALS.

       Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by striking ``take or fail to take'' and inserting ``take, 
     threaten to take, or fail to take''.

     SEC. 632. PURCHASE OF SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS, LOCAL FOOD 
                   PRODUCTS, AND RECYCLABLE MATERIALS FOR RESALE 
                   IN COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE SYSTEMS.

       (a) Improved Purchasing Efforts.--Section 2481(c) of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new paragraph:
       ``(3)(A) The governing body established pursuant to 
     paragraph (2) shall endeavor to increase the purchase for 
     resale at commissary stores and exchange stores of 
     sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable 
     materials.
       ``(B) As part of its efforts under subparagraph (A), the 
     governing body shall develop--
       ``(i) guidelines for the identification of fresh meat, 
     poultry, seafood, and fish, fresh produce, and other products 
     raised or produced through sustainable methods; and
       ``(ii) goals, applicable to all commissary stores and 
     exchange stores world-wide, to maximize, to the maximum 
     extent practical, the purchase of sustainable products, local 
     food products, and recyclable materials by September 30, 
     2018.''.
       (b) Deadline for Establishment and Guidelines.--The initial 
     guidelines required by paragraph (3)(B)(i) of section 2481(c) 
     of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), 
     shall be issued not later than two years after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 633. CORRECTION OF OBSOLETE REFERENCES TO CERTAIN 
                   NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES.

       Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 
     by striking ``Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service, Navy 
     Ship's Stores Ashore'' and inserting ``Navy Ships Stores 
     Program''.

                       Subtitle E--Other Matters

     SEC. 641. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR CARE AND 
                   DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS RETAINED BY THE 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FORENSIC PATHOLOGY 
                   INVESTIGATION.

       (a) Disposition of Remains of Persons Whose Death Is 
     Investigated by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner.--
       (1) Covered decedents.--Section 1481(a) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of 
     this title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding 
     paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been 
     retained by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a 
     forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical 
     Examiner under section 1471 of this title.''.
       (2) Authorized expenses relating to care and disposition of 
     remains.--Section 1482 of such title is amended by adding at 
     the end the following new subsection:
       ``(g)(1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery, 
     care, and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by 
     section 1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those 
     expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by 
     the Secretary of Defense, would not have been incurred but 
     for the retention of those remains for purposes of a forensic 
     pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner 
     under section 1471 of this title. The Secretary concerned 
     shall pay all other expenses authorized to be paid under this 
     section only on a reimbursable basis. Amounts reimbursed to 
     the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be 
     credited to appropriations available at the time of 
     reimbursement for the payment of such expenses.
       ``(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person 
     designated under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the 
     remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the 
     remains that were retained for the forensic pathology 
     investigation, the Secretary may pay for the transportation 
     of those remains to, and interment or inurnment of those 
     remains in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary, 
     in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid under 
     subsection (a)(8).
       ``(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may 
     be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort 
     under subsection (a)(8), whether or not on a reimbursable 
     basis.''.
       (b) Clarification of Coverage of Inurnment.--Section 
     1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting ``or 
     inurnment'' after ``Interment''.
       (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 1482(f) of such title is 
     amended in the third sentence by striking ``this subsection'' 
     and inserting ``this section''.

     SEC. 642. PROVISION OF STATUS UNDER LAW BY HONORING CERTAIN 
                   MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS AS VETERANS.

       (a) Veteran Status.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 38, United States Code, 
     is amended by inserting after section 107 the following new 
     section:

     ``Sec. 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who 
       performed service in the reserve components

       ``Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of title 10 
     to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for age, would 
     be entitled under such chapter to retired pay for nonregular 
     service shall be honored as a veteran but shall not be 
     entitled to any benefit by reason of this section.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 107 the following new item:

``107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in 
              the reserve components.''.

       (b) Clarification Regarding Benefits.--No person may 
     receive any benefit under the laws administered by the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of section 
     107A of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection 
     (a).

     SEC. 643. SURVEY OF MILITARY PAY AND BENEFITS PREFERENCES.

       (a) Survey Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry 
     out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces 
     regarding military pay and benefits.
       (b) Content of Survey.--A survey under this section shall 
     be conducted for the purpose of soliciting information on the 
     following:
       (1) The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the 
     following forms of compensation relative to one another:
       (A) Basic pay.
       (B) Allowances for housing and subsistence.

[[Page 8934]]

       (C) Bonuses and special pays.
       (D) Dependent healthcare benefits.
       (E) Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old.
       (F) Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees.
       (G) Retirement pay.
       (2) How the members value different levels of pay or 
     benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles 
     on the value of benefits.
       (3) Any other issues related to military pay and benefits 
     as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
       (4) How information collected pursuant to a previous 
     paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and other 
     factors the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
       (c) Submission of Results.--Upon the completion of a survey 
     conducted under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to Congress and make publicly available a report 
     containing the results of the survey, including both the 
     analyses and the raw data collected.

                   TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

              Subtitle A--Improvements to Health Benefits

     SEC. 701. MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES.

       (a) In General.--Section 1074m of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
       (A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as 
     subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
       ``(B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member 
     is deployed.''; and
       (2) in subsection (c)(1)(A)--
       (A) in clause (i), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
     semicolon;
       (B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
       (C) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
       ``(ii) by personnel in deployed units whose 
     responsibilities include providing unit health care services 
     if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel 
     for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such 
     personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended by striking ``subparagraph (B) 
     and (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (C) and (D)''.

     SEC. 702. PERIODIC MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
                   THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members 
       of the armed forces

       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall provide 
     periodic, person-to-person mental health assessments to each 
     member of the armed forces serving on active duty.
       ``(b) Frequency.--The Secretary shall determine the 
     frequency of the mental health assessments provided under 
     subsection (a).
       ``(c) Elements.--(1) The mental health assessments provided 
     under subsection (a) shall meet the requirements for mental 
     health assessments as described in section 1074m(c)(1) of 
     this title.
       ``(2) The Secretary may treat health assessments and other 
     person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of 
     the armed forces, including examinations under sections 1074f 
     and 1074m of this title, as meeting the requirements for 
     mental health assessments required under subsection (a) if 
     the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-
     person assessments meet the requirements for mental health 
     assessments established by this section.
       ``(d) Sharing of Information.--Section 1074m(e) of this 
     title, regarding the sharing of information with the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall apply to mental health 
     assessments provided under subsection (a).
       ``(e) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense, in 
     consultation with the other administering Secretaries, shall 
     prescribe regulations for the administration of this 
     section.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 1074m the following new item:

``1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the armed 
              forces.''.

                 Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

     SEC. 711. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME FOR CERTAIN 
                   BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN TRICARE PRIME.

       Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1816) is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
       (2) by inserting the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Access to TRICARE Prime.--
       ``(1) One-time election.--Subject to paragraph (3), the 
     Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible 
     beneficiary who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September 
     30, 2013, may make a one-time election to continue such 
     enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a contract 
     described in subsection (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such 
     enrollment based on the location in which such beneficiary 
     resides. The beneficiary may continue such enrollment in 
     TRICARE Prime so long as the beneficiary resides in the same 
     ZIP code as the ZIP Code in which the beneficiary resided at 
     the time of such election.
       ``(2) Enrollment in tricare standard.--If an affected 
     eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under 
     paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll 
     in TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance with a contract 
     described in subsection (a)(2)(A).
       ``(3) Residence at time of election.--An affected eligible 
     beneficiary may not make the one-time election under 
     paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the 
     beneficiary does not reside in a ZIP code that is in a region 
     described in subsection (c)(1)(B).''.

     SEC. 712. COOPERATIVE HEALTH CARE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE 
                   MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND NON-MILITARY HEALTH 
                   CARE ENTITIES.

       Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 
     2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary of Defense'' 
     and inserting ``Secretary concerned'';
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) by striking ``Secretary shall'' and inserting 
     ``Secretary concerned shall'';
       (B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``if the Secretary 
     establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense'' 
     before the semicolon; and
       (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or the military 
     department concerned'' after ``the Department of Defense''; 
     and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(e) Secretary Concerned Defined.--In this section, the 
     term `Secretary concerned' means--
       ``(1) the Secretary of a military department; or
       ``(2) the Secretary of Defense.''.

     SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INTEGRATED 
                   ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD PROGRAM.

       (a) Limitation.-- Of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for procurement or research, development, 
     test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense for the 
     integrated electronic health record program, not more than 75 
     percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 
     days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of 
     Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a 
     report detailing an analysis of alternatives for the plan of 
     the Secretary to proceed with such program.
       (b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) A description of the key performance requirements for 
     the integrated electronic health record program capability.
       (2) An analysis of alternatives for how to acquire and 
     implement an integrated electronic health record capability 
     that meets such requirements.
       (3) An assessment of the budgetary resources and timeline 
     required for each of the evaluated alternatives.
       (4) A recommendation by the Secretary with respect to the 
     alternative preferred by the Secretary.

     SEC. 714. PILOT PROGRAM ON INCREASED THIRD-PARTY COLLECTION 
                   REIMBURSEMENTS IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT 
                   FACILITIES.

       (a) Pilot Program.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
     with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall carry 
     out a pilot program to demonstrate and assess the feasibility 
     of implementing processes described in paragraph (2) to 
     increase the amounts collected under section 1095 of title 
     10, United States Code, from a third-party payer for charges 
     for health care services incurred by the United States at a 
     military medical treatment facility.
       (2) Processes described.--The processes described in this 
     paragraph are revenue-cycle management processes, including 
     cash-flow management and accounts-receivable processes.
       (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the pilot program under 
     subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall--
       (1) identify and analyze the best practice option, 
     including commercial best practices, with respect to the 
     processes described in subsection (a)(2) that are used in 
     nonmilitary health care facilities; and
       (2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess measurable 
     results of the pilot program, including an analysis of--
       (A) the different processes used in the pilot program;
       (B) the amount of third-party collections that resulted 
     from such processes;
       (C) the cost to implement and sustain such processes; and
       (D) any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate 
     to assess the pilot program.
       (c) Locations.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot 
     program under subsection (a)(1)--
       (1) at military installations that have a military medical 
     treatment facility with inpatient and outpatient 
     capabilities;
       (2) at a number of such installations at different military 
     departments that the Secretary determines sufficient to fully 
     assess the results of the pilot program.
       (d) Duration.--The Secretary shall commence the pilot 
     program under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall carry 
     out such program for three years.
       (e) Report.--Not later than 180 days after completing the 
     pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     describing the results of the program, including--
       (1) a comparison of--
       (A) the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that were 
     used in the military medical treatment facilities 
     participating in the program; and
       (B) the third-party collection processes used by military 
     medical treatment facilities not included in the program;

[[Page 8935]]

       (2) a cost analysis of implementing the processes described 
     in subsection (a)(2) for third-party collections at military 
     medical treatment facilities; and
       (3) an assessment of the program, including any 
     recommendations to improve third-party collections.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 721. DISPLAY OF BUDGET INFORMATION FOR EMBEDDED MENTAL 
                   HEALTH PROVIDERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve 
       components: display of budget information

       ``The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a 
     part of the documentation that supports the President's 
     annual budget for the Department of Defense, a budget 
     justification display with respect to embedded mental health 
     providers within each reserve component, including the amount 
     requested for each such component.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: 
              display of budget information.''.

     SEC. 722. AUTHORITY OF UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF 
                   HEALTH SCIENCES TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS AND 
                   AGREEMENTS AND MAKE GRANTS TO OTHER NONPROFIT 
                   ENTITIES.

       Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (B)--
       (A) by inserting ``, or any other nonprofit entity'' after 
     ``Military Medicine''; and
       (B) by inserting ``, or nonprofit entity,'' after ``such 
     Foundation''; and
       (2) in subparagraph (C)--
       (A) by inserting ``, or any other nonprofit entity,'' after 
     ``Military Medicine''; and
       (B) by inserting ``, or nonprofit entity,'' after ``such 
     foundation''.

     SEC. 723. MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORT FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL AND 
                   FAMILIES.

       The Secretary of Defense may carry out collaborative 
     programs to--
       (1) respond to the escalating suicide rates and combat 
     stress related arrest rates of members of the Armed Forces; 
     and
       (2) train active duty members to recognize and respond to 
     combat stress disorder, suicide risk, substance addiction, 
     risk-taking behaviors, and family violence.

     SEC. 724. RESEARCH REGARDING HYDROCEPHALUS.

       In conducting the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program, 
     the Secretary of Defense may consider selecting medical 
     research projects relating to hydrocephalus.

     SEC. 725. TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY RESEARCH.

       The Secretary of Defense shall carry out research, 
     development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to 
     traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including 
     activities regarding drug development to halt 
     neurodegeneration following traumatic brain injury.

  TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED 
                                MATTERS

             Subtitle A--Acquisition Policy and Management

     SEC. 801. MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM 
                   ACQUISITION PROGRAMS WHEN INITIAL OPERATING 
                   CAPABILITY IS NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN FIVE YEARS OF 
                   MILESTONE A APPROVAL.

       (a) Submission to Pre-certification Authority.--Subsection 
     (b) of section 811 of the John Warner National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 
     120 Stat. 2316; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by striking 
     ``the system shall be deemed to have undergone'' and all that 
     follows through the period and inserting ``the appropriate 
     official shall report such failure, along with the facts and 
     circumstances surrounding the failure, to the appropriate 
     pre-certification authority for that system under section 
     2222 of title 10, United States Code, and the information so 
     reported shall be considered by the pre-certification 
     authority in the decision whether to recommend certification 
     of obligations under that section.''.
       (b) Covered Systems.--Subsection (c) of such section is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``3542(b)(2) of title 44'' and inserting 
     ``section 2222(j)(2) of title 10''; and
       (2) by inserting ``, and that is not designated in section 
     2445a of title 10, United States Code, as a `major automated 
     information system program' or an `other major information 
     technology investment program''' before the period at the 
     end.
       (c) Updated References to DOD Issuances.--Subsection (d) of 
     such section is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Department of Defense 
     Instruction 5000.2'' and inserting ``Department of Defense 
     Directive 5000.01''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Department of Defense 
     Instruction 5000.2, dated May 12, 2003'' and inserting 
     ``Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, dated December 
     3, 2008''.

     SEC. 802. ENHANCED TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED AT 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORIES.

       (a) Definitions.--As used in this section:
       (1) The term ``military department'' has the meaning 
     provided in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.
       (2) The term ``DOD laboratory'' or ``laboratory'' means any 
     facility or group of facilities that--
       (A) is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise used by the 
     Department of Defense; and
       (B) meets the definition of ``laboratory'' as provided in 
     subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler 
     Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).
       (b) Authority.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
     of a military department each may authorize the heads of DOD 
     laboratories to grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially 
     exclusive licenses, royalty free or for royalties or for 
     rights to other intellectual property, for computer software 
     and its related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory, 
     but only if--
       (A) the computer software and related documentation would 
     be a trade secret under the meaning of section 552(b)(4) of 
     title 5, United States Code, if the information had been 
     obtained from a non-Federal party;
       (B) the public is notified of the availability of the 
     software and related documentation for licensing and 
     interested parties have a fair opportunity to submit 
     applications for licensing;
       (C) such licensing activities and licenses comply with the 
     requirements under section 209 of title 35, United States 
     Code; and
       (D) the software originally was developed to meet the 
     military needs of the Department of Defense.
       (2) Protections against unauthorized disclosure.--The 
     Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military 
     department each shall provide appropriate precautions against 
     the unauthorized disclosure of any computer software or 
     documentation covered by paragraph (1)(A), including 
     exemption from section 552 of title 5, United States Code, 
     for a period of up to 5 years after the development of the 
     computer software by the DOD laboratory.
       (c) Royalties.--
       (1) Use of royalties.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
     any royalties or other payments received by the Department of 
     Defense or a military department from licensing computer 
     software or documentation under paragraph (b)(1) shall be 
     retained by the Department of Defense or the military 
     department and shall be disposed of as follows:
       (A)(i) The Department of Defense or the military department 
     shall pay each year the first $2,000, and thereafter at least 
     15 percent, of the royalties or other payments, to be divided 
     among the employees who developed the computer software.
       (ii) The Department of Defense or the military department 
     may provide appropriate lesser incentives, from the royalties 
     or other payments, to laboratory employees who are not 
     developers of such computer software but who substantially 
     increased the technical value of the software.
       (iii) The Department of Defense or the military department 
     shall retain the royalties and other payments received until 
     it makes payments to employees of a DOD laboratory under 
     clause (i) or (ii).
       (iv) The Department of Defense or the military department 
     may retain an amount reasonably necessary to pay expenses 
     incidental to the administration and distribution of 
     royalties or other payments under this section by an 
     organizational unit of the Department of Defense or military 
     department other than its laboratories.
       (B) The balance of the royalties or other payments shall be 
     transferred by the Department of Defense or the military 
     department to its laboratories, with the majority share of 
     the royalties or other payments going to the laboratory where 
     the development occurred. The royalties or other payments so 
     transferred to any DOD laboratory may be used or obligated by 
     that laboratory during the fiscal year in which they are 
     received or during the 2 succeeding fiscal years--
       (i) to reward scientific, engineering, and technical 
     employees of the DOD laboratory, including developers of 
     sensitive or classified technology, regardless of whether the 
     technology has commercial applications;
       (ii) to further scientific exchange among the laboratories 
     of the agency;
       (iii) for education and training of employees consistent 
     with the research and development missions and objectives of 
     the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD 
     laboratory, and for other activities that increase the 
     potential for transfer of the technology of the laboratories;
       (iv) for payment of expenses incidental to the 
     administration and licensing of computer software or other 
     intellectual property made at that DOD laboratory, including 
     the fees or other costs for the services of other agencies, 
     persons, or organizations for intellectual property 
     management and licensing services; or
       (v) for scientific research and development consistent with 
     the research and development missions and objectives of the 
     DOD laboratory.
       (C) All royalties or other payments retained by the 
     Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory 
     after payments have

[[Page 8936]]

     been made pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B) that are 
     unobligated and unexpended at the end of the second fiscal 
     year succeeding the fiscal year in which the royalties and 
     other payments were received shall be paid into the Treasury 
     of the United States.
       (2) Exception.--If, after payments under paragraph (1)(A), 
     the balance of the royalties or other payments received by 
     the Department of Defense or the military department in any 
     fiscal year exceed 5 percent of the funds received for use by 
     the DOD laboratory for research, development, engineering, 
     testing, and evaluation or other related administrative, 
     processing or value-added activities for that year, 75 
     percent of such excess shall be paid to the Treasury of the 
     United States and the remaining 25 percent may be used or 
     obligated under paragraph (1)(B). Any funds not so used or 
     obligated shall be paid into the Treasury of the United 
     States.
       (3) Status of payments to employees.--Any payment made to 
     an employee under this section shall be in addition to the 
     regular pay of the employee and to any other awards made to 
     the employee, and shall not affect the entitlement of the 
     employee to any regular pay, annuity, or award to which the 
     employee is otherwise entitled or for which the employee is 
     otherwise eligible or limit the amount thereof except that 
     the monetary value of an award for the same project or effort 
     shall be deducted from the amount otherwise available under 
     this paragraph. Payments, determined under the terms of this 
     paragraph and made to an employee developer as such, may 
     continue after the developer leaves the DOD laboratory or the 
     Department of Defense or military department. Payments made 
     under this section shall not exceed $75,000 per year to any 
     one person, unless the President approves a larger award 
     (with the excess over $75,000 being treated as a Presidential 
     award under section 4504 of title 5, United States Code).
       (d) Information in Report.--The report required by section 
     2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include 
     information regarding the implementation and effectiveness of 
     this section.
       (e) Expiration.--The authority provided in this section 
     shall expire on December 31, 2018.

     SEC. 803. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL AMOUNT 
                   AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES.

       Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or 2013'' each place it 
     appears and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or 
     2015''; and
       (2) by striking ``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' each place 
     it appears and inserting ``fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 
     2015''.

Subtitle B--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, 
                            and Limitations

     SEC. 811. ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES IN 
                   REGULATIONS RELATING TO DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE 
                   OF COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC PARTS.

       Section 818(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1493; 
     10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended--
       (1) in clause (i), by inserting ``electronic'' after 
     ``avoid counterfeit''; and
       (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``were provided'' and 
     inserting the following: ``were--

       ``(I) procured from an original manufacturer or its 
     authorized dealer or from a trusted supplier in accordance 
     with regulations described in paragraph (3); or
       ``(II) provided''.

     SEC. 812. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE OF 
                   COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC PARTS.

       Section 818(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) 
     is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in subparagraph (B), at the end of clause (iii), by 
     striking the period and inserting ``; and''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(C) the cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect 
     counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or 
     corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or 
     inclusion of obsolete parts are not allowable costs under 
     Department contracts, unless--
       ``(i) the offeror's proposal in response to a Department of 
     Defense solicitation for maintenance, refurbishment, or 
     remanufacture work identifies obsolete electronic parts and 
     includes a plan to ensure trusted sources of supply for 
     obsolete electronic parts, or to implement design 
     modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts;
       ``(ii) the Department elects not to fund design 
     modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts; and
       ``(iii) the contractor applies inspections and tests 
     intended to detect counterfeit electronic parts and suspect 
     counterfeit electronic parts when purchasing electronic parts 
     from other than the original manufacturers or their 
     authorized dealers, pursuant to paragraph (3).''.

     SEC. 813. GOVERNMENT-WIDE LIMITATIONS ON ALLOWABLE COSTS FOR 
                   CONTRACTOR COMPENSATION.

       (a) Defense Contracts.--
       (1) Amendments relating to contractor employees.--
     Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(P) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for 
     a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to 
     the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted 
     annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment 
     Cost Index for total compensation for private industry 
     workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally 
     adjusted, except that the Secretary of Defense may establish 
     narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science, 
     technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and 
     manufacturing fields upon a determination that such 
     exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of 
     Defense has continued access to needed skills and 
     capabilities.''.
       (2) Amendments relating to senior executives of certain 
     contractors.--Section 2324(e)(1) of such title is further 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(Q) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a 
     covered contractor.''.
       (3) Definitions.--Section 2324(l) of such title is 
     amended--
       (A) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 
     paragraph (5):
       ``(5) The term `senior executives', with respect to a 
     covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated 
     employees of the contractor. In determining the five most 
     highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with 
     components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the 
     determination shall be made using the five most highly 
     compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each 
     component.''; and
       (B) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new 
     paragraph (7):
       ``(7) The term `covered contractor', with respect to a 
     fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal 
     contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during 
     the previous fiscal year.''.
       (b) Civilian Agency Contracts.--
       (1) Amendments relating to contractor employees.--Paragraph 
     (16) of section 4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(16) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for 
     a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to 
     the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted 
     annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment 
     Cost Index for total compensation for private industry 
     workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally 
     adjusted, except that the executive agency may establish 
     narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science, 
     technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and 
     manufacturing fields upon a determination that such 
     exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive agency has 
     continued access to needed skills and capabilities.''.
       (2) Amendments relating to senior executives of certain 
     contractors.--Section 4304(a) of such title is further 
     amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(17) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a 
     covered contractor.''.
       (3) Definitions.--Section 4301 of such title is amended by 
     striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new 
     paragraphs (4) and (5):
       ``(4) The term `senior executives', with respect to a 
     covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated 
     employees of the contractor. In determining the five most 
     highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with 
     components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the 
     determination shall be made using the five most highly 
     compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each 
     component.
       ``(5) The term `covered contractor', with respect to a 
     fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal 
     contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during 
     the previous fiscal year.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendments.--Chapter 11 of title 41, United 
     States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking section 1127; and
       (2) by striking the item relating to that section in the 
     table of sections at the beginning of such chapter.
       (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred 
     under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 
     days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 814. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATE INFORMATION 
                   IN CERTAIN REPORTS.

       (a) Additional Cost Estimate Information Required to Be 
     Included in Selected Acquisition Reports.--Section 2432(c)(1) 
     of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C) and (D) as 
     subparagraphs (C), (D), and (F), respectively;
       (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 
     subparagraph (B):
       ``(B) for each major defense acquisition program or 
     designated major subprogram included in the report--
       ``(i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in 
     section 2433(a)(2) of this title), along with the associated 
     risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate;
       ``(ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as that term is 
     defined in section 2435(d)(1) of this title), along with the 
     associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate;
       ``(iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was adjusted or 
     revised pursuant to section 2435(d)(2) of this title, such 
     adjusted or revised estimate, along with the associated risk 
     curve and sensitivity of that estimate; and
       ``(iv) the primary risk parameters associated with the 
     current procurement cost for the program (as that term is 
     used in section 2432(e)(4) of this title);'';

[[Page 8937]]

       (3) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking 
     ``and'' at the end; and
       (4) by inserting after subparagraph (D), as so 
     redesignated, the following new subparagraph (E):
       ``(E) estimated contract termination costs; and''.
       (b) Additional Duties of Director of Cost Assessment and 
     Program Evaluation With Respect to SAR.--
       (1) Review required.--Section 2334(a) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended--
       (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (6);
       (B) by striking the period and inserting ``; and'' at the 
     end of paragraph (7); and
       (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (8):
       ``(8) annually review the cost estimates and associated 
     information required to be included, by section 2432(c)(1)(B) 
     of this title, in the Selected Acquisition Reports required 
     by that section.''.
       (2) Additional information required in annual report.--
     Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended--
       (A) by striking ``report, an assessment of--'' and 
     inserting ``report--'';
       (B) in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by 
     inserting ``an assessment of'' before the first word of the 
     text;
       (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (D) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (E) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(D) a summary of the cost estimate information reviewed 
     under subsection (a)(8), an identification of any trends in 
     that information, an aggregation of the cumulative risk of 
     the portfolio of systems reviewed under that subsection, and 
     recommendations for improving cost estimates on the basis of 
     the review under that subsection.''.

     SEC. 815. AMENDMENT RELATING TO COMPELLING REASONS FOR 
                   WAIVING SUSPENSION OR DEBARMENT.

       Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by inserting after the first sentence the following: ``The 
     Secretary of Defense shall also make the determination 
     described in subsection (a)(2) available on a publicly 
     accessible website.''.

     SEC. 816. REQUIREMENT THAT COST OR PRICE TO THE FEDERAL 
                   GOVERNMENT BE GIVEN AT LEAST EQUAL IMPORTANCE 
                   AS TECHNICAL OR OTHER CRITERIA IN EVALUATING 
                   COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS FOR DEFENSE CONTRACTS.

       (a) Requirement.--Subparagraph (A) of section 2305(a)(3) of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
     ``proposals; and'' at the end of clause (ii) and all that 
     follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting the 
     following: ``proposals and that must be assigned importance 
     at least equal to all evaluation factors other than cost or 
     price when combined.''.
       (b) Waiver.--Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further 
     amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(B) The requirement of subparagraph (A)(ii) relating to 
     assigning at least equal importance to evaluation factors of 
     cost or price may be waived by the head of the agency.''.
       (c) Report.--Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(C) Not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal 
     year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, and 
     post on a publicly available website of the Department of 
     Defense, a report containing a list of each waiver issued by 
     the head of an agency under subparagraph (B) during the 
     preceding fiscal year.''.

     SEC. 817. REQUIREMENT TO BUY AMERICAN FLAGS FROM DOMESTIC 
                   SOURCES.

       Section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) A flag of the United States of America (within the 
     meaning of chapter 1 of title 4).''.

Subtitle C--Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency 
                   Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan

     SEC. 821. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING 
                   WITH THE ENEMY.

       (a) Amendments Relating to Prohibition.--Section 841(a)(1) 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012 (Public Law 112-81; 126 Stat. 1510) is amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
     ``Commander of the United States Central Command'' and 
     inserting ``commander of a covered combatant command'';
       (2) in subparagraph (A)--
       (A) by striking ``Commander of the United States Central 
     Command'' and inserting ``commander of the covered combatant 
     command''; and
       (B) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of 
     operations'' and inserting ``theater of operations of that 
     command'';
       (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``United States 
     Central Command theater of operations'' and inserting 
     ``theater of operations of the covered combatant command''; 
     and
       (4) in subparagraph (C)--
       (A) by striking ``Commander of the United States Central 
     Command'' and inserting ``commander of the covered combatant 
     command''; and
       (B) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of 
     operations'' and inserting ``theater of operations of that 
     command''.
       (b) Amendments Relating to Contract Clause.--Section 
     841(b)(3) of such Act is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$100,000'' and inserting ``$50,000''; and
       (2) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of 
     operations'' and inserting ``theater of operations of a 
     covered combatant command''.
       (c) Amendments Relating to Identification of Contracts.--
     Section 841(c) of such Act is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) by striking ``, acting through the Commander of the 
     United States Central Command,''; and
       (B) by striking ``United States Central Command theater of 
     operations'' and inserting ``theaters of operations of 
     covered combatant commands'';
       (2) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by striking ``Commander of the United States Central 
     Command'' and inserting ``commander of a covered combatant 
     command''; and
       (B) by striking ``Commander may notify'' and inserting 
     ``commander may notify''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``Commander of the United 
     States Central Command'' and inserting ``commander of a 
     covered combatant command''.
       (d) Amendments Relating to Nondelegation of 
     Responsibilities.--Section 841(d)(2) of such Act is amended 
     by striking ``Commander of the United States Central 
     Command'' and inserting ``commander of a covered combatant 
     command''.
       (e) Amendments Relating to Definitions.--Section 841(f) of 
     such Act is amended--
       (1) by striking the subsection heading and inserting 
     ``Definitions.--'';
       (2) by striking ``In this section, the term'' and inserting 
     the following: ``In this section:
       ``(1) Contingency operation.--The term''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) Covered combatant command.--The term `covered 
     combatant command' means the United States Central Command, 
     the United States European Command, the United States 
     Southern Command, and the United States Pacific Command.''.
       (f) Repeal of Sunset.--Subsection (g) of section 841 of 
     such Act is repealed.
       (g) Technical Amendments.--
       (1) Conforming amendment to section heading.--
       (A) The heading of section 841 of such Act is amended by 
     striking ``IN THE UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND THEATER OF 
     OPERATIONS''.
       (B) The item relating to section 841 in the table of 
     sections at the beginning of title VIII and in section 2 of 
     such Act is amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 841. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy.''.

       (2) Repeal of superseded deadlines.--Paragraph (1) of each 
     of subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 841 of such Act 
     is amended by striking ``Not later than 30 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and inserting 
     ``The''.
       (h) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall apply to contracts entered into on or after the date 
     that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 822. COLLECTION OF DATA RELATING TO CONTRACTS IN IRAQ 
                   AND AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) Penalties.--Section 861 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 
     10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new subsection:
       ``(e) Penalties for Failure to Comply.--Any contract in 
     Afghanistan entered into or modified after the date of the 
     enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2014 may include a clause requiring the 
     imposition of a penalty on any contractor that does not 
     comply with the policies or guidance issued or the 
     regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c). Compliance 
     with such policies, guidance, or regulations may be 
     considered as a factor in the determination of award and 
     incentive fees.''.
       (b) Penalty Information Covered in Report.--Section 863(c) 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(4) Any penalties imposed on contractors for failing to 
     comply with requirements under section 861(e), including 
     requirements to provide information for the common databases 
     identified under section 861(b)(4).''.

                       Subtitle D--Other Matters

     SEC. 831. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM ON ACQUISITION OF 
                   MILITARY PURPOSE NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS.

       Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4296; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking 
     ``the date that is five years after the date of the enactment 
     of this Act.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2019.''.

     SEC. 832. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PRODUCTS AND 
                   SERVICES PRODUCED IN COUNTRIES ALONG A MAJOR 
                   ROUTE OF SUPPLY TO AFGHANISTAN.

       Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2399), as 
     amended by section 841(a) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1845), is amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' 
     and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.

[[Page 8938]]



      TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

              Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

     SEC. 901. REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AS THE 
                   DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.

       (a) Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the 
     Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.--
       (1) Redesignation of military department.--The military 
     department designated as the Department of the Navy is 
     redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
       (2) Redesignation of secretary and other statutory 
     offices.--
       (A) Secretary.--The position of the Secretary of the Navy 
     is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine 
     Corps.
       (B) Other statutory offices.--The positions of the Under 
     Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the 
     Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy 
     are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and 
     Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and 
     Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of 
     the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively.
       (b) Conforming Amendments to Title 10, United States 
     Code.--
       (1) Definition of ``military department''.--Paragraph (8) 
     of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     to read as follows:
       ``(8) The term `military department' means the Department 
     of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and 
     the Department of the Air Force.''.
       (2) Organization of department.--The text of section 5011 
     of such title is amended to read as follows: ``The Department 
     of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under 
     the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.''.
       (3) Position of secretary.--Section 5013(a)(1) of such 
     title is amended by striking ``There is a Secretary of the 
     Navy'' and inserting ``There is a Secretary of the Navy and 
     Marine Corps''.
       (4) Chapter headings.--
       (A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to 
     read as follows:

       ``CHAPTER 503--DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS''.

       (B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to 
     read as follows:

  ``CHAPTER 507--COMPOSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE 
                                CORPS''.

       (5) Other amendments.--
       (A) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
     ``Department of the Navy'' and ``Secretary of the Navy'' each 
     place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1), 
     (2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection 
     captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and 
     inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and 
     ``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively, in 
     each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface 
     and typestyle as the matter stricken.
       (B)(i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 
     5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking 
     ``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy'' and inserting 
     ``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps''.
       (ii) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the 
     item relating to such section in the table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by 
     inserting ``and Marine Corps'' after ``of the Navy'', with 
     the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface 
     and typestyle as the matter amended.
       (c) Other Provisions of Law and Other References.--
       (1) Title 37, united states code.--Title 37, United States 
     Code, is amended by striking ``Department of the Navy'' and 
     ``Secretary of the Navy'' each place they appear and 
     inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and 
     ``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively.
       (2) Other references.--Any reference in any law other than 
     in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any 
     regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 
     States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to 
     be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine 
     Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in 
     subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to 
     that office as redesignated by that section.
       (d) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made 
     by this section shall take effect on the first day of the 
     first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 902. REVISIONS TO COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN FOR 
                   DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.

       Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``defense business 
     enterprise architecture'' and inserting ``target defense 
     business systems computing environment described in 
     subsection (d)(3)'';
       (2) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by striking ``existing as of September 30, 2011 (known 
     as `legacy systems') that will not be part of the defense 
     business enterprise architecture'' and inserting ``that will 
     be phased out of the defense business systems computing 
     environment within three years after review and certification 
     as `legacy systems' by the investment management process 
     established under subsection (g)''; and
       (B) by striking ``that provides for reducing the use of 
     those legacy systems in phases''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``legacy systems 
     (referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the 
     target defense business systems computing environment 
     described in subsection (d)(3)'' and inserting ``existing 
     systems that are part of the target defense business systems 
     computing environment''.

                      Subtitle B--Space Activities

     SEC. 911. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SATELLITE REPORTING POLICY.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Department of Defense depends on national security 
     space programs to support, among other critical 
     capabilities--
       (A) communications;
       (B) missile warning;
       (C) position, navigation, and timing;
       (D) intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; and
       (E) environmental monitoring; and
       (2) foreign threats to national security space systems are 
     increasing.
       (b) Notification of Foreign Interference of National 
     Security Space.--Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national 
       security space

       ``(a) Notice Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall, 
     with respect to each attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, 
     degrade, or destroy a United States national security space 
     capability, provide to the appropriate congressional 
     committees--
       ``(1) not later than 48 hours after the Secretary 
     determines that there is reason to believe such attempt 
     occurred, notice of such attempt; and
       ``(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the 
     Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such 
     attempt occurred, a notification described in subsection (b) 
     with respect to such attempt.
       ``(b) Notification Description.--A notification described 
     in this subsection is a notification that includes--
       ``(1) the name and a brief description of the national 
     security space capability that was impacted by an attempt by 
     a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United 
     States national security space capability;
       ``(2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign 
     actor, the date and time of such attempt, and any related 
     capability outage and the mission impact of such outage; and
       ``(3) any other information the Secretary considers 
     relevant.
       ``(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--The 
     term `appropriate congressional committees' means--
       ``(1) the congressional defense committees; and
       ``(2) with respect to a notice or notification related to 
     an attempt by a foreign entity to disrupt, degrade, or 
     destroy a United States national security space capability 
     that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee 
     on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the 
     Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.''.
       (c) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections at 
     the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end 
     the following item:

``2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security 
              space.''.

     SEC. 912. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE DEFENSE AND PROTECTION.

       (a) Review.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall enter 
     into an arrangement with the National Research Council to--
       (1) in response to the near-term and long-term threats to 
     the national security space systems of the United States, 
     conduct a review of--
       (A) the range of strategic options available to address 
     such threats, in terms of deterring hostile actions, 
     defeating hostile actions, or surviving hostile actions until 
     such actions conclude;
       (B) strategies and plans to counter such threats, including 
     resilience, reconstitution, disaggregation, and other 
     appropriate concepts; and
       (C) existing and planned architectures, warfighter 
     requirements, technology development, systems, workforce, or 
     other factors related to addressing such threats; and
       (2) identify recommend courses of action to address such 
     threats, including potential barriers or limiting factors in 
     implementing such courses of action.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the National Research Council 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the 
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the Senate a report containing the results of the review 
     conducted pursuant to the arrangement under subsection (a) 
     and the recommended courses of action identified pursuant to 
     such arrangement.
       (2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.
       (c) Space Protection Strategy.--Section 911(f)(1) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 
     U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by striking ``including each of 
     the matters required by subsection (c).'' and inserting the 
     following: ``including--
       ``(A) each of the matters required by subsection (c); and
       ``(B) a description of how the Department of Defense and 
     the intelligence community plan to

[[Page 8939]]

     provide necessary national security capabilities, through 
     alternative space, airborne, or ground systems, if a foreign 
     actor degrades, denies access to, or destroys United States 
     national security space capabilities.''.

     SEC. 913. SPACE ACQUISITION STRATEGY.

       (a) Strategy Required.--The Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with 
     the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, 
     shall establish a strategy to enable the multi-year 
     procurement of commercial satellite services.
       (b) Basis.--The strategy required under subsection (a) 
     shall include and be based on--
       (1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to acquiring 
     satellite services through multi-year acquisition approaches;
       (2) an analysis of the risks associated with such 
     acquisition approaches;
       (3) an identification of methods to address planning, 
     programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to such 
     approaches, including methods to address potential 
     termination liability or cancellation costs generally 
     associated with multi-year contracts;
       (4) an identification of any changes needed in the 
     requirements development and approval processes of the 
     Department of Defense to facilitate effective and efficient 
     implementation of such strategy, including an identification 
     of any consolidation of requirements for such services across 
     the Department that may achieve increased buying power and 
     efficiency; and
       (5) an identification of any necessary changes to policies, 
     procedures, regulations, or statutes.
       (c) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with 
     the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees the 
     strategy required under subsection (a), including the 
     elements required under subsection (b).

     SEC. 914. SPACE CONTROL MISSION REPORT.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the space 
     control mission of the Department of Defense. Such report 
     shall include--
       (1) an identification of existing offensive and defensive 
     space control systems, policies, and technical possibilities 
     of future systems;
       (2) an identification of any gaps or risks in existing 
     space control system architecture and possibilities for 
     improvement or mitigation of such gaps or risks;
       (3) a description of existing and future sensor coverage 
     and ground processing capabilities for space situational 
     awareness;
       (4) an explanation of the extent to which all relevant and 
     available information is being utilized for space situational 
     awareness to detect, track, and identify objects in space;
       (5) a description of existing space situational awareness 
     data sharing practices, including what information is being 
     shared and what the benefits and risks of such sharing are to 
     the national security of the United States; and
       (6) plans for the future space control mission.

     SEC. 915. RESPONSIVE LAUNCH.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) United States Strategic Command has identified three 
     needs as a result of dramatically increased demand and 
     dependence on space capabilities as follows:
       (A) To rapidly augment existing space capabilities when 
     needed to expand operational capability.
       (B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space 
     capabilities to preserve continuity of operations capability.
       (C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space technological or 
     operational innovations to increase the advantage of the 
     United States.
       (2) Operationally responsive low cost launch could assist 
     in addressing such needs of the combatant commands.
       (b) Study.--The Department of Defense Executive Agent for 
     Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch 
     efforts. Such study shall include--
       (1) a review of existing and past operationally responsive, 
     low-cost launch efforts by domestic or foreign governments or 
     industry;
       (2) a technology assessment of various methods to develop 
     an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and
       (3) an assessment of the viability of greater utilization 
     of innovative methods, including the use of secondary payload 
     adapters on existing launch vehicles.
       (c) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive 
     Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report containing--
       (1) the results of the study conducted under subsection 
     (b); and
       (2) a consolidated plan for development within the 
     Department of Defense of an operationally responsive, low-
     cost launch capability.

  Subtitle C--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

     SEC. 921. REVISION OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY TO 
                   ENGAGE IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS SECURITY FOR 
                   INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES.

       (a) Period for Required Audits.--Section 432(b)(2) of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``annually'' and 
     inserting ``biennially''; and
       (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``the intelligence 
     committees'' and all that follows and inserting ``the 
     congressional defense committees and the congressional 
     intelligence committees (as defined in section 437(c)).''
       (b) Repeal of Designation of Defense Intelligence Agency as 
     Required Oversight Authority Within Department of Defense.--
     Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``Defense Intelligence Agency'' and 
     inserting ``Department of Defense''; and
       (2) by striking ``management and supervision'' and 
     inserting ``oversight''.
       (c) Congressional Oversight.--Section 437 of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the intelligence 
     committees'' and inserting ``congressional defense committees 
     and the congressional intelligence committees'';
       (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``the intelligence 
     committees'' and inserting ``congressional defense committees 
     and the congressional intelligence committees''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) Congressional Intelligence Committees Defined.--In 
     this section, the term `congressional intelligence 
     committees' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of 
     the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).''.

     SEC. 922. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIES.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
       (1) establish a written policy governing the internal 
     coordination and prioritization of intelligence priorities of 
     the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the 
     combatant commands, and the military departments to improve 
     identification of the intelligence needs of the Department of 
     Defense;
       (2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of the 
     Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the 
     combatant commands, and the military departments; and
       (3) provide to the congressional defense committees, the 
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the Senate a briefing on the policy established under 
     paragraph (1) and the gaps identified under paragraph (2).

     SEC. 923. DEFENSE CLANDESTINE SERVICE.

       (a) Certification Required.--Not more than 50 percent of 
     the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise available to the Department of Defense for the 
     Defense Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may be 
     obligated or expended for the Defense Clandestine Service 
     until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the 
     covered congressional committees that--
       (1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed primarily 
     to--
       (A) fulfill priorities of the Department of Defense that 
     are unique to the Department of Defense or otherwise unmet; 
     and
       (B) provide unique capabilities to the intelligence 
     community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National 
     Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))); and
       (2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics that will 
     be used to ensure that the Defense Clandestine Service is 
     employed as described in paragraph (1).
       (b) Annual Assessments.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter 
     for five years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     covered congressional committees a detailed assessment of 
     Defense Clandestine Service employment and performance based 
     on the metrics referred to in subsection (a)(2).
       (c) Notification of Future Changes to Design.--Following 
     the submittal of the certification referred to in subsection 
     (a), in the event that any significant change is made to the 
     Defense Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly 
     notify the covered congressional committees of the nature of 
     such change.
       (d) Quarterly Briefings.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a 
     briefing on the deployments and collection activities of 
     personnel of the Defense Clandestine Service.
       (e) Covered Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``covered congressional committees'' means 
     the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select 
     Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, 
     and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

     SEC. 924. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM 
                   CONSOLIDATION.

       (a) Prohibition.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated 
     or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 
     be used during the period beginning on the date of the 
     enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to 
     execute--
       (1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program 
     budget from the Department of Defense budget;
       (2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program 
     budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
       (3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or 
     appropriations account structure for the National 
     Intelligence Program budget.
       (b) Briefing Requirement.--Not later than 30 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly 
     provide to the congressional defense committees, the 
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the

[[Page 8940]]

     House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the Senate a briefing regarding any planning 
     relating to the future execution of the activities described 
     in subsection (a) that has occurred during the two-year 
     period ending on such date and any anticipated future 
     planning relating to such execution or related efforts.
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) National intelligence program.--The term ``National 
     Intelligence Program'' has the meaning given the term in 
     section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
     3003).
       (2) National intelligence program budget.--The term 
     ``National Intelligence Program budget'' means the portions 
     of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the 
     National Intelligence Program.

                 Subtitle D--Cyberspace-Related Matters

     SEC. 931. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR INVENTORY OF 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TACTICAL DATA LINK 
                   SYSTEMS.

       Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2225 note; Public Law 112-
     239; 126 Stat. 1885) is amended by inserting ``and an 
     assessment of vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access 
     or area-denial environments'' before the semicolon.

     SEC. 932. DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES 
                   CYBER COMMAND.

       (a) Assessment.--The Defense Science Board shall conduct an 
     assessment of the organization, missions, and authorities of 
     the United States Cyber Command.
       (b) Elements.--The assessment required by subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) A review of the existing organizational structure of 
     the United States Cyber Command, including--
       (A) the positive and negative impact on the Command 
     resulting from a single individual simultaneously serving as 
     the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the 
     Director of the National Security Agency;
       (B) the oversight activities undertaken by the Commander 
     and the Director with regard to the Command and the Agency, 
     respectively, including how the respective oversight 
     activities affect the ability of each entity to complete the 
     respective missions of such entity;
       (C) the dependencies of the Command and the Agency on one 
     another under the existing management structure of both 
     entities, including an examination of the advantages and 
     disadvantages attributable to the unity of command and unity 
     of effort resulting from a single individual simultaneously 
     serving as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command 
     and the Director of the National Security Agency;
       (D) the ability of the existing management structure of the 
     Command and the Agency to identify and adequately address 
     potential conflicts of interest between the roles of the 
     Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director 
     of the National Security Agency; and
       (E) the ability of the Department of Defense to train and 
     develop, through professional assignment, individuals with 
     the appropriate subject-matter expertise and management 
     experience to support both the cyber operations missions of 
     the Command and the signals intelligence missions of the 
     Agency.
       (2) A review of the missions of the Command, including 
     whether the reliance of the Command on the Agency for 
     critical warfighting infrastructure, organization, and 
     personnel contributes to or detracts from the ability of the 
     Command to achieve the missions of the Command.
       (3) A review of how the Commander of the United States 
     Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security 
     Agency implement authorities where missions intersect to 
     ensure that the activities of each entity are conducted only 
     pursuant to the respective authorities of each entity.
       (c) Report.--
       (1) Report required.--Not later than 300 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Science Board 
     shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Director of 
     National Intelligence, the congressional defense committees, 
     the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House 
     of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 
     of the Senate a report containing--
       (A) the results of the assessment required by subsection 
     (a); and
       (B) recommendations for improvements or changes to the 
     organization, missions, or authorities of the United States 
     Cyber Command.
       (2) Additional evaluation required.--Not later than 60 days 
     after the date on which the committees referred to in 
     paragraph (1) receive the report required by such paragraph, 
     the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National 
     Intelligence shall jointly submit to such committees an 
     evaluation of the findings and recommendations contained in 
     such report.
       (3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.
       (d) Intelligence Community Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``intelligence community'' has the meaning given the 
     term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 
     U.S.C. 3003(4)).

     SEC. 933. MISSION ANALYSIS FOR CYBER OPERATIONS OF DEPARTMENT 
                   OF DEFENSE.

       (a) Mission Analysis Required.--Not later than one year 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     Defense shall conduct a mission analysis of the cyber 
     operations of the Department of Defense.
       (b) Elements.--The mission analysis under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       (1) The concept of operations and concept of employment for 
     cyber operations forces.
       (2) An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber 
     operations forces, including military requirements for both 
     active and reserve components and civilian requirements.
       (3) A description of the alignment of the organization and 
     reporting chains of the Department, the military departments, 
     and the combatant commands.
       (4) An assessment of the current, as of the date of the 
     analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber operations 
     forces.
       (5) An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of cyber 
     operations, depends upon organizations outside of the 
     Department, including industry and international partners.
       (6) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission assurance, and 
     continuity of operations for cyber operations.
       (7) An evaluation of the potential roles of the reserve 
     components in the concept of operations and concept of 
     employment for cyber operations forces required under 
     paragraph (1).
       (c) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the 
     completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the 
     Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report containing--
       (1) the results of the mission analysis; and
       (2) recommendations for improving or changing the roles, 
     organization, missions, concept of operations, or authorities 
     related to the cyber operations of the Department.
       (d) National Guard Assessment.--Not later than 30 days 
     after the date on which the Secretary submits the report 
     required under subsection (c), the Chief of the National 
     Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees an assessment of the role of the National Guard in 
     supporting the cyber operations mission of the Department of 
     Defense as such mission is described in such report.
       (e) Form.--The report under subsection (c) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.

     SEC. 934. NOTIFICATION OF INVESTIGATIONS RELATED TO 
                   COMPROMISE OF CRITICAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

       (a) Notification of Investigation Initiation.--
       (1) Notification.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
     the initiation of any investigation related to the potential 
     compromise of Department of Defense critical program 
     information related to a weapons system or other 
     developmental activity, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a written 
     notification of such investigation including the elements 
     required under paragraph (2).
       (2) Elements.--The written notification required under 
     paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to an investigation 
     described in such subsection, the following elements:
       (A) A statement of the reason for such investigation.
       (B) An identification of each party affected by such 
     investigation.
       (C) An identification of the party responsible for 
     conducting such investigation.
       (D) Any preliminary observations, findings, or 
     recommendations related to such investigation.
       (E) A timeline and methodology for conducting such 
     investigation.
       (b) Notification of Completion of Certain Investigations.--
     Not later than 30 days after the date of the completion of 
     any investigation conducted or overseen by the Damage 
     Assessment Management Office of the Department of Defense, 
     the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a written notification of such 
     investigation, including a summary of the findings and 
     recommendations of such investigation.
       (c) Report on Intrusions After January 1, 2000.--Not later 
     than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report detailing the known network cyber 
     intrusions that occurred on or after January 1, 2000, and 
     before August 1, 2013, and resulted in the compromise of 
     critical program information related to a weapons system, 
     information system development, or another research and 
     development initiative of the Department of Defense. Such 
     report shall include a description of the critical program 
     information that was compromised, the source of each network 
     that was compromised, the systems or developmental activities 
     that were compromised, and the suspected origin of each cyber 
     intrusion.

     SEC. 935. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SOFTWARE 
                   LICENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

       (a) Updated Plan.--
       (1) Update.--The Chief Information Officer of the 
     Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with the 
     chief information officers of the military departments and 
     the Defense Agencies, update the plan for the inventory of 
     selected software licenses of the Department of Defense 
     required under section 937 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 10 U.S.C. 
     2223 note) to include a plan for the inventory of all 
     software licenses of the Department of Defense for which a 
     military department spends more than $5,000,000 annually on 
     any individual title, including a comparison of licenses 
     purchased with licenses installed and of those uninstalled 
     and then reinstalled.
       (2) Elements.--The update required under paragraph (1) 
     shall--

[[Page 8941]]

       (A) be done in a comprehensive and auditable format that is 
     verified by an independent third party;
       (B) include details on the process and business systems 
     necessary to regularly perform reviews, a procedure for 
     validating and reporting deregistering and registering new 
     software, and a mechanism and plan to relay that information 
     to the enterprise provider; and
       (C) a proposed timeline for implementation of the updated 
     plan in accordance with paragraph (3).
       (3) Implementation.--Not later than September 30, 2013, the 
     Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall 
     implement the updated plan required under paragraph (1).
       (b) Performance Plan.--If the Chief Information Officer of 
     the Department of Defense determines through the update 
     required by subsection (a) that the number of software 
     licenses of the Department for an individual title for which 
     a military department spends greater than $5,000,000 annually 
     exceeds the needs of the Department for such software 
     licenses, or the inventory discloses that there is a 
     discrepancy between the number of software licenses purchased 
     and those in actual use, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     implement a plan to bring the number of such software 
     licenses into balance with the needs of the Department and 
     the terms of any relevant contract.

                   Subtitle E--Total Force Management

     SEC. 941. REQUIREMENT TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT LEVELS OF 
                   GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT OF FUNCTIONS CLOSELY 
                   ASSOCIATED WITH INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL 
                   FUNCTIONS.

       (a) Requirement.--Section 129a of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(g) Requirement for Oversight or Appropriate Corrective 
     Actions.--For purposes of subsection (f)(3)(B), if 
     insufficient levels of Government oversight are found, the 
     Secretary of the military department or head of the Defense 
     Agency responsible shall provide such oversight or take 
     appropriate corrective actions, including potential 
     conversion to Government performance, consistent with this 
     section and sections 129 and 2463 of this title.''.
       (b) Amendment Relating to Review of Certain Contracts.--
     Subsection (e)(2)(C) of section 2330a of such title is 
     amended by adding after ``governmental functions'' the 
     following: ``in which there is inadequate oversight of the 
     contractor personnel performing such functions''.

     SEC. 942. FIVE-YEAR REQUIREMENT FOR CERTIFICATION OF 
                   APPROPRIATE MANPOWER PERFORMANCE.

       Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections 
     (h) and (i), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new 
     section (g):
       ``(g) Certifications of Appropriate Manpower Performance.--
     (1) Beginning in fiscal year 2014 and continuing through 
     fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense, or an official 
     designated personally by the Secretary, no later than 
     February 1 of each reporting year, shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees the findings of the reviews 
     required under subsection (e) and certify in writing that--
       ``(A) all Department of Defense contractor positions 
     identified as being responsible for the performance of 
     inherently governmental functions have been eliminated;
       ``(B) each Department of Defense contract that is a 
     personal services contract has been entered into, and is 
     being performed, in accordance with applicable laws and 
     regulations; and
       ``(C) any contract for services that includes any functions 
     that are closely associated with inherently governmental 
     functions or designated as critical have been reviewed to 
     determine if those activities should be--
       ``(i) subject to action pursuant to section 2463 of this 
     title; or
       ``(ii) converted to an acquisition approach that would be 
     more advantageous to the Department of Defense.
       ``(2) If the certifications required in paragraph (1) are 
     not submitted by the date required in a reporting year, the 
     Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall assess 
     the Department's compliance with subsection (e) and determine 
     why the Secretary could not make the certifications required 
     in paragraph (1). The Inspector General shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees, not later than May 1 of the 
     reporting year, a report on such assessment and 
     determination.
       ``(3) Not later than May 1 of each reporting year, the 
     Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report containing the 
     Comptroller General's assessment of the reviews conducted 
     under subsection (e) and the actions taken to resolve the 
     findings of the reviews.''.

                      TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                     Subtitle A--Financial Matters

     SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

       (a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
       (1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of 
     Defense that such action is necessary in the national 
     interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of 
     authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in 
     this division for fiscal year 2014 between any such 
     authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions 
     thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be 
     merged with and be available for the same purposes as the 
     authorization to which transferred.
       (2) Limitation.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 
     total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may 
     transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed 
     $3,500,000,000.
       (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel 
     authorizations.--A transfer of funds between military 
     personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted 
     toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
       (b) Limitations.--The authority provided by subsection (a) 
     to transfer authorizations--
       (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that 
     have a higher priority than the items from which authority is 
     transferred; and
       (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that 
     has been denied authorization by Congress.
       (c) Effect on Authorization Amounts.--A transfer made from 
     one account to another under the authority of this section 
     shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the 
     account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal 
     to the amount transferred.
       (d) Notice to Congress.--The Secretary shall promptly 
     notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

     SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT.

       The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
     complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall 
     be determined by reference to the latest statement titled 
     ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, 
     submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the 
     Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
     Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted 
     prior to the vote on passage of this Act.

     SEC. 1003. AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2018 
                   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
       (1) reaffirms the findings of the Panel on Defense 
     Financial Management and Auditability Reform of the Committee 
     on Armed Services of the House of Representatives;
       (2) points to the Government Accountability Office's most 
     recent High Risk List recommendations;
       (3) is encouraged by the important progress the Department 
     of Defense has made in achieving auditability; and
       (4) stands ready to continue helping in this effort.
       (b) Sense of Congress on DOD Financial Management Reform.--
     It is the sense of Congress that, in the aftermath of the 
     effects of sequestration as enacted by the Budget Control Act 
     of 2011 (Public Law 112-25), financial management reform is 
     imperative, and the Department of Defense should place 
     continued importance on, and remain vigilant in, its 
     financial management reform efforts.
       (c) Audit of DOD Financial Statements.--In addition to the 
     requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
     111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement 
     and Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be 
     taken and the costs associated with ensuring that the 
     financial statements of the Department of Defense are 
     validated as ready for audit by not later than September 30, 
     2017, upon the conclusion of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall ensure that a full audit is performed on the 
     financial statements of the Department of Defense for such 
     fiscal year. The Secretary shall submit to Congress the 
     results of that audit by not later than March 31, 2019.

     SEC. 1004. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL 
                   NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN 
                   NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION.

       (a) Transfer Authorized.--If the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated for the weapons activities of the National 
     Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 is less than 
     $8,400,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such 
     activities in fiscal year 2014 as specified in the report 
     under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2549)), 
     the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts 
     authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense 
     for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary 
     of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be 
     available only for weapons activities of the National Nuclear 
     Security Administration.
       (b) Notice to Congress.--In the event of a transfer under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly 
     notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such 
     notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from 
     which funds are transferred.
       (c) Transfer Mechanism.--Any funds transferred under this 
     section shall be transferred in accordance with established 
     procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor 
     provisions of law.
       (d) Construction of Authority.--The transfer authority 
     provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other 
     transfer authority provided under this Act.

                  Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

     SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED COUNTER-
                   DRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN COLOMBIA.

       Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375; 
     118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal

[[Page 8942]]

     Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
     ``2014''; and
       (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
     ``2014''.

     SEC. 1012. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT TASK FORCES TO 
                   PROVIDE SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 
                   CONDUCTING COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES.

       Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10 
     U.S.C. 371 note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking 
     ``2013'' and inserting ``2014''.

     SEC. 1013. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE 
                   ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES 
                   OF CERTAIN FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.

       Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 
     111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1006(a) 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1557), is amended by 
     striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2015''.

     SEC. 1014. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE NATIONAL GUARD 
                   COUNTER-NARCOTIC PROGRAM.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program is a 
     valuable tool to counter-drug operations across the United 
     States, especially on the southwest border;
       (2) the National Guard has an important role in combating 
     drug trafficking into the United States; and
       (3) the program should received continued funding.

                Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

     SEC. 1021. CLARIFICATION OF SOLE OWNERSHIP RESULTING FROM 
                   SHIP DONATIONS AT NO COST TO THE NAVY.

       (a) Clarification of Transfer Authority.--Subsection (a) of 
     section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 
     read as follows:
       ``(a) Authority to Make Transfer.--The Secretary of the 
     Navy may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest 
     to any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any 
     captured vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public 
     display in the United States, to--
       ``(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth 
     or possession of the United States, or any municipal 
     corporation or political subdivision thereof; or
       ``(2) any nonprofit entity.''.
       (b) Clarification of Limitations on Liability and 
     Responsibility.--Subsection (b) of such section is amended to 
     read as follows:
       ``(b) Limitations on Liability and Responsibility.--(1) The 
     United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and 
     their officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or 
     in equity for any injury or damage to any person or property 
     occurring on a vessel donated under this section.
       ``(2) Notwithstanding any other law, the United States and 
     all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and 
     employees, shall have no responsibility or obligation to 
     make, engage in, or provide funding for, any improvement, 
     upgrade, modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair 
     to a vessel donated under this section.''.
       (c) Clarification That Transfers to Be Made at No Cost to 
     United States.--Subsection (c) of such section is amended by 
     inserting after ``under this section'' the following: ``, the 
     maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a museum or 
     memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that vessel, including 
     demilitarization of Munitions List items at the end of the 
     useful life of the vessel as a museum or memorial,''.
       (d) Application of Environmental Laws; Definitions.--Such 
     section is further amended by adding at the end the following 
     new subsections:
       ``(e) Application of Environmental Laws.--Nothing in this 
     section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, 
     interstate, and local environmental laws and regulations, 
     including the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et 
     seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
     Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et 
     seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee.
       ``(f) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `nonprofit entity' means any entity 
     qualifying as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) 
     of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
       ``(2) The term `Munitions List' means the United States 
     Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the 
     Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).
       ``(3) The term `donee' means any entity receiving a vessel 
     pursuant to subsection (a).''.
       (e) Clerical Amendments.--
       (1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is 
     amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; 
       captured vessels: conveyance by donation''.

       (2) Table of sections.--The item relating to such section 
     in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of 
     such title is amended to read as follows:

``7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: 
              conveyance by donation.''''.

     SEC. 1022. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR 
                   INACTIVATION OF TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR 
                   DOCK LANDING SHIPS.

       (a) Limitation on Availability of Funds.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), none 
     of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, 
     prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser 
     or dock landing ship.
       (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the funds 
     referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended 
     to retire the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9.
       (b) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
       (1) Authority.--Subject to the availability of 
     appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Defense may 
     transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013 specifically for 
     the modernization of vessels referred to in subsection 
     (a)(1). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be 
     merged with and be available for the same purposes as the 
     authorization to which transferred.
       (2) Limitation.--The total amount of authorizations that 
     the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this 
     subsection may not exceed $914,676,000.
       (3) Additional authority.--The transfer authority provided 
     by this subsection is in addition to the transfer authority 
     provided under section 1001 of this Act and under section 
     1001 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1902).

     SEC. 1023. REPAIR OF VESSELS IN FOREIGN SHIPYARDS.

       (a) Nonhomeported Vessels.--Subsection (a) of section 7310 
     of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``A naval'' and inserting ``(1) A naval''; 
     and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) For purposes of this section, a naval vessel that 
     does not have a designated homeport shall be treated as being 
     homeported in the United States or Guam.''.
       (b) Voyage Repair.--Such section is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (c)(3)(C), by striking ``as defined in 
     Commander Military Sealift Command Instruction 4700.15C 
     (September 13, 2007) or Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual 
     (Commander Fleet Forces Command Instruction 4790.3 Revision 
     A, Change 7), Volume III''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(d) Voyage Repair Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `voyage repair' has the meaning given such term in Navy 
     Instruction COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3B.''.

     SEC. 1024. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING A BALANCED FUTURE 
                   NAVAL FORCE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) The battle force of the Navy must be sufficiently sized 
     and balanced in capability to meet current and anticipated 
     future national security objectives.
       (2) A robust and balanced naval force is required for the 
     Department of Defense to fully execute the President's 
     National Security Strategy.
       (3) To develop and sustain required capabilities the Navy 
     must balance investment and maintenance costs across various 
     ship types, including--
       (A) aircraft carriers;
       (B) surface combatants;
       (C) submarines;
       (D) amphibious assault ships; and
       (E) other auxiliary vessels, including support vessels 
     operated by the Military Sealift Command.
       (4) Despite a Marine Corps requirement for 38 amphibious 
     assault ships, the Navy possesses only 30 amphibious assault 
     ships with an average of 22 ships available for surge 
     deployment.
       (5) The inadequate level of investment in Navy shipbuilding 
     over the last 20 years has resulted in--
       (A) a fragile shipbuilding industrial base, both in the 
     construction yards and secondary suppliers of materiel and 
     equipment; and
       (B) increased costs per vessel stemming from low production 
     volume.
       (6) The Department of Defense, Military Construction and 
     Veterans Affairs, and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 provided $263,000,000 towards the 
     advance procurement of materiel and equipment required to 
     continue the San Antonio LPD 17 amphibious transport dock 
     class to a total of 12 ships, a key first step in rebalancing 
     the amphibious assault ship force structure.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Department of Defense and the Department of the 
     Navy must prioritize funding towards increased shipbuilding 
     rates to enable the Navy to meet the full-range of combatant 
     commander requests;
       (2) the Department of the Navy's future budget requests and 
     the Long Range Plan for the Construction of Naval Forces must 
     realistically anticipate and reflect the true investment 
     necessary to meet stated force structure goals;
       (3) without modification to Long Range Plan for the 
     Construction of Naval Forces shipbuilding plan, the future of 
     the industrial base that enables construction of large, 
     combat-survivable amphibious assault ships is at significant 
     risk; and

[[Page 8943]]

       (4) the Department of Defense and Congress should act 
     expeditiously to restore the force structure and capability 
     balance of the Navy fleet as quickly as possible.

     SEC. 1025. AUTHORITY FOR SHORT-TERM EXTENSION OR RENEWAL OF 
                   LEASES FOR VESSELS SUPPORTING THE TRANSIT 
                   PROTECTION SYSTEM ESCORT PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2401 of title 10, 
     United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may extend or 
     renew the lease of not more than four blocking vessels 
     supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program after 
     the date of the expiration of the lease of such vessels, as 
     in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Such an 
     extension shall be for a term that is the shorter of--
       (1) the period beginning on the date of the expiration of 
     the lease in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 
     and ending on the date on which the Secretary determines that 
     a substitute is available for the capabilities provided by 
     the lease, or that the capabilities provided by the vessel 
     are no longer required; or
       (2) 180 days.
       (b) Funding.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
     section 301 and available for operation and maintenance, 
     Navy, as specified in the funding tables in section 4301, may 
     be available for the extension or renewal of a lease under 
     subsection (a).
       (c) Notice to Congress.--Prior to extending or renewing a 
     lease under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees notification 
     of the proposed extension or renewal. Such notification shall 
     include--
       (1) a detailed description of the term of the proposed 
     contract for the extension or renewal of the lease and a 
     justification for extending or renewing the lease rather than 
     obtaining the capability provided for by the lease, charter, 
     or services involved through purchase of the vessel; and
       (2) a plan for meeting the capability provided for by the 
     lease upon the completion of the term of the lease contract, 
     as extended or renewed under subsection (a).

                      Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

     SEC. 1030. CLARIFICATION OF PROCEDURES FOR USE OF ALTERNATE 
                   MEMBERS ON MILITARY COMMISSIONS.

       (a) Primary and Alternate Members.--
       (1) Number of members.--Subsection (a) of section 948m of 
     title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (A) in paragraph (1)--
       (i) by striking ``at least five members'' and inserting 
     ``at least five primary members and as many alternate members 
     as the convening authority shall detail''; and
       (ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
     ``Alternate members shall be designated in the order in which 
     they will replace an excused primary member.'' and
       (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``primary'' after ``the 
     number of''.
       (2) General rules.--Such section is further amended--
       (A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections 
     (d) and (e), respectively; and
       (B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsections (b) and (c):
       ``(b) Primary Members.--Primary members of a military 
     commission under this chapter are voting members.
       ``(c) Alternate Members.--(1) A military commission may 
     include alternate members to replace primary members who are 
     excused from service on the commission.
       ``(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on 
     the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall 
     replace the excused primary member and the trial may 
     proceed.''.
       (3) Excuse of members.--Subsection (d) of such section, as 
     redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended--
       (A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting 
     ``primary or alternate'' before ``member'';
       (B) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (2),
       (C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and 
     inserting ``; or''; and
       (D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to 
     reduce the number of alternate members required for service 
     on the commission, as determined by the convening 
     authority.''.
       (4) Absent and additional members.--Subsection (e) of such 
     section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended--
       (A) in the first sentence--
       (i) by inserting ``the number of primary members of'' after 
     ``Whenever'';
       (ii) by inserting ``primary'' before ``members required 
     by''; and
       (iii) by inserting ``and there are no remaining alternate 
     members to replace the excused primary members'' after 
     ``subsection (a)''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``An 
     alternate member who was present for the introduction of all 
     evidence shall not be considered to be a new or additional 
     member.''.
       (b) Challenges.--Section 949f of such title is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``primary or 
     alternate'' before ``member''; and
       (2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following 
     new sentence: ``Nothing in this section prohibits the 
     military judge from awarding to each party such additional 
     peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of 
     justice.''.
       (c) Number of Votes Required.--Section 949m of such title 
     is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``primary'' before ``members'' each place 
     it appears; and
       (2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence 
     need not be the same primary members who voted on the 
     conviction if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this 
     title are met.''.

     SEC. 1031. MODIFICATION OF REGIONAL DEFENSE COMBATING 
                   TERRORISM FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM REPORTING 
                   REQUIREMENT.

       (a) In General.--Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``, including engagement 
     activities for program alumni,'' after ``effectiveness of the 
     program'';
       (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ``program'' the 
     following: ``, including a list of any unfunded or unmet 
     training requirements and requests''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(5) A discussion and justification of how the program 
     fits within the theater security priorities of each of the 
     commanders of the geographic combatant commands.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
     shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal 
     year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1032. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY 
                   FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE 
                   DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 
                   STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

       (a) In General.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated 
     or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 
     be used during the period beginning on the date of the 
     enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to 
     construct or modify any facility in the United States, its 
     territories, or possessions to house any individual detained 
     at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment 
     in the custody or under the control of the Department of 
     Defense unless authorized by Congress.
       (b) Exception.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not 
     apply to any modification of facilities at United States 
     Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
       (c) Individual Detained at Guantanamo Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' has 
     the meaning given that term in section 1033(f)(2).

     SEC. 1033. REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE 
                   TRANSFER OF DETAINEES AT UNITED STATES NAVAL 
                   STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FOREIGN 
                   COUNTRIES AND OTHER FOREIGN ENTITIES.

       (a) Certification Required Prior to Transfer.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2) and 
     subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any 
     amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available 
     to the Department of Defense to transfer, during the period 
     beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 
     on December 31, 2014, any individual detained at Guantanamo 
     to the custody or control of the individual's country of 
     origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign 
     entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the 
     certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30 
     days before the transfer of the individual.
       (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action 
     taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at 
     Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition 
     of the individual that is issued by a court or competent 
     tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction 
     (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after 
     issuance).
       (b) Certification.--A certification described in this 
     subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary 
     of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State 
     and in consultation with the Director of National 
     Intelligence, that--
       (1) the government of the foreign country or the recognized 
     leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual 
     detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred--
       (A) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a 
     designated foreign terrorist organization;
       (B) maintains control over each detention facility in which 
     the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be 
     housed in a detention facility;
       (C) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a 
     threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to 
     exercise control over the individual;
       (D) has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure 
     that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United 
     States, its citizens, or its allies in the future;
       (E) has taken or agreed to take such actions as the 
     Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that 
     the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist 
     activity; and
       (F) has agreed to share with the United States any 
     information that--
       (i) is related to the individual or any associates of the 
     individual; and
       (ii) could affect the security of the United States, its 
     citizens, or its allies; and
       (2) includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified 
     form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if 
     applicable) of the foreign

[[Page 8944]]

     country or entity in relation to the Secretary's 
     certifications.
       (c) Prohibition in Cases of Prior Confirmed Recidivism.--
       (1) Prohibition.--Except as provided in paragraph (2) and 
     subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any 
     amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available to the Department of Defense to transfer any 
     individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control 
     of the individual's country of origin, any other foreign 
     country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed 
     case of any individual who was detained at United States 
     Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after 
     September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign 
     country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist 
     activity.
       (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action 
     taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at 
     Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition 
     of the individual that is issued by a court or competent 
     tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction 
     (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after 
     issuance).
       (d) National Security Waiver.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
     applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification 
     requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of 
     subsection (b)(1) or the prohibition in subsection (c), if 
     the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by 
     subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by subsection (c) 
     and, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in 
     consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, 
     determines that--
       (A) alternative actions will be taken to address the 
     underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be 
     waived;
       (B) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of 
     subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the 
     risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been 
     completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under 
     subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with 
     regard to the individual to be transferred;
       (C) in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the 
     Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an 
     individual who was transferred to the country subsequently 
     engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken 
     under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk 
     of recidivism with regard to the individual to be 
     transferred; and
       (D) the transfer is in the national security interests of 
     the United States.
       (2) Reports.--Whenever the Secretary makes a determination 
     under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the 
     appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days 
     before the transfer of the individual concerned, the 
     following:
       (A) A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned.
       (B) A statement of the basis for the determination, 
     including--
       (i) an explanation why the transfer is in the national 
     security interests of the United States;
       (ii) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of 
     subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not possible to 
     certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be 
     waived have been completely eliminated; and
       (iii) a classified summary of--

       (I) the individual's record of cooperation while in the 
     custody of or under the effective control of the Department 
     of Defense; and
       (II) the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for 
     continuing cooperation.

       (C) A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to 
     address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks 
     addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived.
       (D) The assessment required by subsection (b)(2).
       (e) Record of Cooperation.--In assessing the risk that an 
     individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist 
     activity or other actions that could affect the security of 
     the United States if released for the purpose of making a 
     certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under 
     subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable 
     consideration to any such individual--
       (1) who has substantially cooperated with United States 
     intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a 
     pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the 
     effective control of the Department of Defense; and
       (2) for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in 
     place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for 
     continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law 
     enforcement authorities.
       (f) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the 
     Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the 
     Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (2) The term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' means 
     any individual located at United States Naval Station, 
     Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who--
       (A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of 
     the Armed Forces of the United States; and
       (B) is--
       (i) in the custody or under the control of the Department 
     of Defense; or
       (ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval 
     Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
       (3) The term ``foreign terrorist organization'' means any 
     organization so designated by the Secretary of State under 
     section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
     1189).

     SEC. 1034. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER 
                   OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 
                   STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

       No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available to the Department of Defense may be used during the 
     period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
     ending on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist 
     in the transfer or release to or within the United States, 
     its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or 
     any other detainee who--
       (1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed 
     Forces of the United States; and
       (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United 
     States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department 
     of Defense.

     SEC. 1035. UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF INFORMATION RELATING TO 
                   INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT PARWAN, AFGHANISTAN.

       Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly 
     available an unclassified summary of information relating to 
     the individuals detained by the Department of Defense at the 
     Detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, pursuant to the 
     Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 
     50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who have been determined to represent an 
     enduring security threat to the United States. Such summary 
     shall cover any individual detained at such facility as of 
     the date of the enactment of this Act and any individual so 
     detained during the two-year period preceding the date of the 
     enactment of this Act. Such summary shall include for each 
     such covered individual--
       (1) a description of the relevant organization or 
     organizations with which the individual is affiliated;
       (2) whether the individual had ever been in the custody or 
     under the effective control of the United States at any time 
     before being detained at such facility and, if so, where the 
     individual had been in such custody or under such effective 
     control; and
       (3) whether the individual has been directly linked to the 
     death of any member of the United States Armed Forces or any 
     United States Government employee.

     SEC. 1036. ASSESSMENT OF AFFILIATES AND ADHERENTS OF AL-QAEDA 
                   OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

       Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary of 
     Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
     an assessment containing each of the following:
       (1) An identification of any group operating outside the 
     United States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or 
     otherwise related to, al-Qaeda.
       (2) A summary of relevant information relating to each such 
     group, including--
       (A) the extent to which members or leaders of the group 
     have--
       (i) conducted or planned to conduct lethal or significant 
     operations outside the borders of the state or states in 
     which the group ordinarily operates;
       (ii) conducted fundraising or recruiting outside the 
     borders of such state or states; and
       (iii) have demonstrated any interest in conducting 
     activities described in clauses (i) and (ii) outside the 
     borders of such state or states;
       (B) the extent to which the connection of the group to the 
     senior leadership of al-Qaeda has changed over time; and
       (C) whether the group has attacked or planned to 
     purposefully attack United States citizens, members of Armed 
     Forces of the United States, or other representatives of the 
     United States, or is likely to do so in the future.
       (3) An assessment of whether each group is part of or 
     substantially supporting al-Qaeda or the Taliban, or 
     constitutes an associated force that is engaged in 
     hostilities against the United States or its coalition 
     partners.
       (4) The criteria used to determine the nature and extent of 
     each group's relationship to al-Qaeda.

     SEC. 1037. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR 
                   OFFICIAL FOR FACILITATING THE TRANSFER OF 
                   INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL 
                   STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
       (1) designate a senior official of the Department of 
     Defense as the official with principal responsibility for 
     coordination and management of the transfer of individuals 
     detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 
     Cuba; and
       (2) set forth the responsibilities of that senior official 
     with respect to such transfers.

     SEC. 1038. RANK OF CHIEF PROSECUTOR AND CHIEF DEFENSE COUNSEL 
                   IN MILITARY COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED TO TRY 
                   INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO.

       For purposes of any military commission established under 
     chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to try an alien 
     unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in 
     section 948a of such title) who is detained at United

[[Page 8945]]

     States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief defense 
     counsel and the chief prosecutor shall have the same rank.

     SEC. 1039. REPORT ON CAPABILITY OF YEMENI GOVERNMENT TO 
                   DETAIN, REHABILITATE, AND PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS 
                   DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO WHO ARE TRANSFERRED TO 
                   YEMEN.

       Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State 
     shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of 
     the Senate a report on the capability of the government of 
     Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals 
     detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 
     1033(f)(2)) who are transferred to Yemen. Such report shall 
     include an assessment of any humanitarian issues that may be 
     encountered in transferring individuals detained at 
     Guantanamo to Yemen.

     SEC. 1040. REPORT ON ATTACHMENT OF RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUALS 
                   DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO IF TRANSFERRED TO THE 
                   UNITED STATES.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General 
     shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, 
     the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the 
     Senate a report that includes each of the following:
       (1) A description of the extent to which an individual 
     detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to the United States, 
     could become eligible, by reason of such transfer, for--
       (A) relief from removal from the United States, including 
     pursuant to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, 
     Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;
       (B) any required release from immigration detention, 
     including pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in 
     Zadvydas v. Davis;
       (C) asylum or withholding of removal; or
       (D) any additional constitutional right.
       (2) For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for which 
     the Secretary and Attorney General determine such an 
     individual could become eligible if so transferred, a 
     description of the reasoning behind such determination and an 
     explanation of the nature of the right.

     SEC. 1040A. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION RELATING TO INDIVIDUALS 
                   DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO WHO BECAME LEADERS OF 
                   FOREIGN TERRORIST GROUPS.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     make publicly available a summary of information relating to 
     individuals who were formerly detained at United States Naval 
     Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who have, since being 
     transferred or released from such detention, have become 
     leaders or involved in the leadership structure of a foreign 
     terrorist group.
       (b) Form of Summary.--The summary required under subsection 
     (a) shall be in unclassified form, but may contain a 
     classified annex.

               Subtitle E--Sensitive Military Operations

     SEC. 1041. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE MILITARY 
                   OPERATIONS.

       (a) Notification Required.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military 
       operations

       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall promptly 
     submit to the congressional defense committees notice in 
     writing of any sensitive military operation following such 
     operation.
       ``(b) Procedures.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall 
     establish and submit to the congressional defense committees 
     procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection 
     (a) consistent with the national security of the United 
     States and the protection of operational integrity.
       ``(2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure 
     that committee procedures designed to protect from 
     unauthorized disclosure classified information relating to 
     national security of the United States are sufficient to 
     protect the information that is submitted to the committees 
     pursuant to this section.
       ``(c) Sensitive Military Operation Defined.--The term 
     `sensitive military operation' means a lethal operation or 
     capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the 
     United States pursuant to--
       ``(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public 
     Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or
       ``(2) any other authority except--
       ``(A) a declaration of war; or
       ``(B) a specific statutory authorization for the use of 
     force other than the authorization referred to in paragraph 
     (1).
       ``(d) Exception.--The notification requirement under 
     subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive 
     military operation executed within the territory of 
     Afghanistan pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military 
     Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
       ``(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall 
     be construed to provide any new authority or to alter or 
     otherwise affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et 
     seq.), the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public 
     Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any requirement under 
     the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et 
     seq.).''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 130e the following new item:

``130f. Congressional notification regarding sensitive military 
              operations.''.

       (b) Effective Date.--Section 130f of title 10, United 
     States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with 
     respect to any sensitive military operation (as defined in 
     subsection (c) of such section) executed on or after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act.
       (c) Deadline for Submittal of Procedures.--The Secretary of 
     Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
     the procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10, 
     United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later 
     than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1042. REPORT ON PROCESS FOR DETERMINING TARGETS OF 
                   LETHAL OPERATIONS.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report containing an 
     explanation of the legal and policy considerations and 
     approval processes used in determining whether an individual 
     or group of individuals could be the target of a lethal 
     operation or capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces 
     of the United States outside the United States.

     SEC. 1043. COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONAL BRIEFINGS.

       (a) Briefings Required.--Chapter 23 of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new section:

     ``Sec. 492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations

       ``(a) Briefings Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly 
     briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism 
     operations and related activities.
       ``(b) Elements.--Each briefing under subsection (a) shall 
     include each of the following:
       ``(1) A global update on activity within each geographic 
     combatant command.
       ``(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues including 
     limitations.
       ``(3) An outline of interagency activities and initiatives.
       ``(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers 
     appropriate.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations.''.

                       Subtitle F--Nuclear Forces

     SEC. 1051. PROHIBITION ON ELIMINATION OF THE NUCLEAR TRIAD.

       (a) Prohibition on Triad Reductions.--None of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 
     available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense 
     may be obligated or expended to reduce, convert, or 
     decommission any strategic delivery system if such reduction, 
     conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the 
     nuclear triad.
       (b) Nuclear Triad Defined.--The term ``nuclear triad'' 
     means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States 
     composed of the following:
       (1) Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles.
       (2) Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and associated 
     ballistic missile submarines.
       (3) Nuclear-certified strategic bombers.

     SEC. 1052. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR REDUCTION 
                   OF NUCLEAR FORCES.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense or the 
     National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or 
     expended to carry out reductions to the nuclear forces of the 
     United States required by the New START Treaty until--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate 
     congressional committees the plan required by section 1042(a) 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1575); and
       (2) the President certifies to the appropriate 
     congressional committees that any further reductions to such 
     forces that result in such forces being reduced below the 
     level required by the New START Treaty will be carried out 
     only pursuant to--
       (A) a treaty or international agreement specifically 
     approved with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant 
     to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution; or
       (B) an Act of Congress specifically authorizing such 
     reductions.
       (b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not 
     apply to the following:
       (1) Reductions made to ensure the safety, security, 
     reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons stockpile 
     and strategic delivery systems, including activities related 
     to surveillance, assessment, certification, testing, and 
     maintenance of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery 
     systems.
       (2) Nuclear warheads that are retired or awaiting 
     dismantlement on the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (3) Inspections carried out pursuant to the New START 
     Treaty.
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
     the following:
       (A) The congressional defense committees.

[[Page 8946]]

       (B) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
     Senate.
       (2) The term ``New START Treaty'' means the Treaty between 
     the United States of America and the Russian Federation on 
     Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of 
     Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and 
     entered into force on February 5, 2011.

     SEC. 1053. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR REDUCTION 
                   OR CONSOLIDATION OF DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT BASED 
                   IN EUROPE.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be used to 
     reduce or consolidate the basing of dual-capable aircraft of 
     the United States that are based in Europe until a period of 
     90 days has elapsed after the date on which the Secretary of 
     Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees 
     that--
       (1) the Russian Federation has carried out similar 
     reductions or consolidations with respect to dual-capable 
     aircraft of Russia;
       (2) the Secretary has consulted with the member states of 
     the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with respect to the 
     planned reduction or consolidation of the Secretary; and
       (3) there is a consensus among such member states in 
     support of such planned reduction or consolidation.
       (b) Dual-capable Aircraft Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``dual-capable aircraft'' means aircraft that can 
     perform both conventional and nuclear missions.

     SEC. 1054. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY 
                   AGREEMENT FOR FURTHER ARMS REDUCTION BELOW THE 
                   LEVELS OF THE NEW START TREATY; LIMITATION ON 
                   RETIREMENT OR DISMANTLEMENT OF STRATEGIC 
                   DELIVERY SYSTEMS.

       (a) Finding; Statement of Policy.--
       (1) Finding.--Congress finds that it was the Declaration of 
     the United States Senate in its Resolution of Advice and 
     Consent to the New START Treaty that ``[t]he Senate declares 
     that further arms reduction agreements obligating the United 
     States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of 
     the United States in any militarily significant manner may be 
     made only pursuant to the treaty-making power of the 
     President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of 
     the Constitution of the United States''.
       (2) Statement of policy.--Congress reaffirms the 
     Declaration described in paragraph (1) and states that any 
     agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the 
     New START Treaty, including those that may seek to use the 
     Treaty's verification regime, may only be made pursuant to 
     the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in 
     Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the 
     United States or by Act of Congress, as set forth in the Arms 
     Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et seq.).
       (b) Limitation.--
       (1) In general.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, 
     dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or 
     deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle if such 
     action reduces the number of covered strategic delivery 
     vehicles to less than the 800 required to implement the New 
     START Treaty.
       (2) Waiver.--In accordance with subsection (c), the 
     President may waive the limitation under paragraph (1) with 
     respect to a fiscal year if the President submits to the 
     appropriate congressional committees written notification 
     that--
       (A) the Senate has given its advice and consent to 
     ratification of a nuclear arms reduction treaty with the 
     Russian Federation that requires Russia to significantly and 
     proportionally reduce its number of nonstrategic nuclear 
     warheads, or an international agreement for such purpose is 
     entered into pursuant to an Act of Congress as set forth in 
     the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et 
     seq.);
       (B) such treaty or agreement has entered into force; and
       (C) such waiver is required during such fiscal year to 
     implement such treaty or agreement.
       (c) Additional Limitations.--
       (1) Certain compliance of nuclear arms control 
     agreements.--If the President makes a waiver under subsection 
     (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 
     this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or 
     any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may 
     be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, 
     or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered 
     strategic delivery vehicle until 30 days elapses following 
     the date on which the President submits to the appropriate 
     congressional committees and the congressional intelligence 
     committees written certification that the Russian Federation 
     is in compliance with its nuclear arms control agreements and 
     obligations with the United States.
       (2) Certain intelligence.--If the President makes a waiver 
     under subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, 
     dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or 
     deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle in 
     accordance with a treaty or international agreement entered 
     into pursuant to an Act of Congress requiring such actions 
     unless the President submits to the appropriate congressional 
     committees and the congressional intelligence committees 
     written certification that the intelligence community has 
     high confidence judgments with respect to--
       (A) the nuclear weapons production capacity of the People's 
     Republic of China;
       (B) the nature, number, location, and targetability of the 
     nuclear weapons and strategic delivery systems of China; and
       (C) the nuclear doctrine of China.
       (d) Exception.--The limitations in subsection (b) and (c) 
     shall not apply to reductions made to ensure the safety, 
     security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons 
     stockpile and strategic delivery systems of the United 
     States, including activities related to surveillance, 
     assessment, certification, testing, and maintenance of 
     nuclear warheads and strategic delivery system.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
     the following:
       (A) The congressional defense committees.
       (B) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
     Senate.
       (2) The term ``congressional intelligence committees'' 
     means the following:
       (A) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
     House of Representatives.
       (B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
       (3) The term ``covered strategic delivery vehicle'' means 
     the following:
       (A) B-52H bomber aircraft.
       (B) B-2 Spirit bomber aircraft.
       (C) Trident ballistic missile submarines.
       (D) Trident II D5 submarine launched ballistic missiles.
       (E) Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles.
       (4) The term ``New START Treaty'' means the Treaty between 
     the United States of America and the Russian Federation on 
     Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of 
     Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and 
     entered into force on February 5, 2011.

     SEC. 1055. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH NUCLEAR ARMS 
                   CONTROL AGREEMENTS.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) President Obama stated in Prague in April 2009 that 
     ``Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words 
     must mean something.''.
       (2) President Obama's Nuclear Posture Review of 2010 
     stated, ``it is not enough to detect non-compliance; 
     violators must know that they will face consequences when 
     they are caught.''.
       (3) The July 2010 Verifiability Assessment released by the 
     Department of State on the New START Treaty stated, ``The 
     costs and risks of Russian cheating or breakout, on the other 
     hand, would likely be very significant. In addition to the 
     financial and international political costs of such an 
     action, any Russian leader considering cheating or breakout 
     from the New START Treaty would have to consider that the 
     United States will retain the ability to upload large numbers 
     of additional nuclear warheads on both bombers and missiles 
     under the New START, which would provide the ability for a 
     timely and very significant U.S. response.''.
       (4) Subsection (a) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent 
     to Ratification of the New START Treaty of the Senate, agreed 
     to on December 22, 2010, listed conditions of the Senate to 
     the ratification of the New START Treaty that are binding 
     upon the President, including the condition under paragraph 
     (1)(B) of such subsection that requires the President to take 
     certain actions in response to actions by the Russian 
     Federation that are in violation of or inconsistent with such 
     treaty, including to ``seek on an urgent basis a meeting with 
     the Russian Federation at the highest diplomatic level with 
     the objective of bringing the Russian Federation into full 
     compliance with its obligations under the New START Treaty''.
       (5) The Obama Administration demonstrated that violations 
     of treaty obligations by other parties require corresponding 
     action by the United States when, on November 22, 2011, the 
     Department of State announced that the United States would 
     ``cease carrying out certain obligations under the 
     Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty with regard 
     to Russia. This announcement in the CFE Treaty's 
     implementation group comes after the United States and NATO 
     Allies have tried over the past 4 years to find a diplomatic 
     solution following Russia's decision in 2007 to cease 
     implementation with respect to all other 29 CFE States. Since 
     then, Russia has refused to accept inspections and ceased to 
     provide information to other CFE Treaty parties on its 
     military forces as required by the Treaty.''.
       (6) On October 17, 2012, the Chairman of the Committee on 
     Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
     Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the House of Representatives wrote a classified letter to the 
     President stating their concerns about a major arms control 
     violation by the Russian Federation.
       (7) The Chairmen followed up their classified letter with 
     unclassified letters on February 14 and April 12, 2013--in 
     their latest letter, the Chairmen stated that they expect the 
     Administration to ``directly confront the Russian violations 
     and circumventions of this and other treaties. . .[we] 
     further ask, again, for your engagement in correcting this 
     behavior. We also seek your commitment not to undertake 
     further reductions to the U.S. nuclear deterrent or extended 
     deterrent until this Russian behavior is

[[Page 8947]]

     corrected. We are in full agreement with your policy as you 
     articulated it in Prague four years ago this month, `rules 
     must be binding, Violations must be punished. Words must mean 
     something.'''.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     the President should consider not seeking to further limit or 
     reduce the nuclear forces of the United States, including by 
     negotiation, with a foreign country that remains in active 
     noncompliance with existing nuclear arms obligations, such as 
     the Russian Federation.
       (c) Obligations of the President in the Event of 
     Noncompliance.--If the President determines that a foreign 
     country is not in compliance with its obligations under a 
     nuclear arms control agreement, treaty, or commitment to 
     which the United States is a party or in which the United 
     States is a participating government, including the Missile 
     Technology Control Regime, the President shall--
       (1) immediately consult with Congress regarding the 
     implications of such noncompliance for--
       (A) the viability of such agreement, treaty, or commitment; 
     and
       (B) the national security interests of the United States 
     and the allies of the United States;
       (2) submit to Congress a plan concerning the diplomatic 
     strategy of the President to engage such foreign country at 
     the highest diplomatic level with the objective of bringing 
     such country into full compliance with such obligations; and
       (3) at the earliest date practicable following the 
     submission of the plan under paragraph (2), submit to 
     Congress a report detailing--
       (A) whether adherence by the United States to such 
     obligation remains in the national security interests of the 
     United States or the allies of the United States; and
       (B) how the United States will redress the effect of such 
     noncompliance to the national security interests of the 
     United States or such allies.

     SEC. 1056. RETENTION OF CAPABILITY TO REDEPLOY MULTIPLE 
                   INDEPENDENTLY TARGETABLE REENTRY VEHICLES.

       (a) Deployment Capability.--The Secretary of the Air Force 
     shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of--
       (1) deploying multiple independently targetable reentry 
     vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic 
     missiles, and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on 
     to such missiles; and
       (2) commencing such deployment not later than 270 days 
     after the date on which the President determines such 
     deployment necessary.
       (b) Warhead Capability.--The Nuclear Weapons Council 
     established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, 
     shall ensure that--
       (1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a sufficient 
     number of nuclear warheads that are capable of being deployed 
     as multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles with 
     respect to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, 
     and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such 
     missiles; and
       (2) such deployment is capable of being commenced not later 
     than 270 days after the date on which the President 
     determines such deployment necessary.

     SEC. 1057. ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM OF THE 
                   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

       Section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1933) is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``August 15, 2013'' and 
     inserting ``August 15, 2014''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(5) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2014 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 
     2014 for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel, 
     not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a 
     period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the 
     Secretary of Defense notifies the appropriate congressional 
     committees that the Secretary has entered into an agreement 
     under paragraph (1) with a federally funded research and 
     development center.''.

     SEC. 1058. COST ESTIMATES FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

       Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1576), as 
     amended by section 1041 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 
     1931), is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2)(F), by inserting ``personnel,'' after 
     ``maintenance,''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period at the 
     end the following: ``, including how and which locations were 
     counted''.

     SEC. 1059. REPORT ON NEW START TREATY.

       Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense 
     and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly 
     submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee 
     on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on 
     whether the New START Treaty (as defined in section 
     494(a)(2)(D)(ii)) of title 10, United States Code) is in the 
     national security interests of the United States.

         Subtitle G--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

     SEC. 1061. ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY OF THE UNITED STATES 
                   GOVERNMENT TO ANALYZE CAPTURED RECORDS.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 21 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 426 the following 
     new section:

     ``Sec. 427. Conflict Records Research Center

       ``(a) Center Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense may 
     establish a center to be known as the `Conflict Records 
     Research Center' (in this section referred to as the 
     `Center').
       ``(b) Purposes.--The purposes of the Center shall be the 
     following:
       ``(1) To establish a digital research database including 
     translations and to facilitate research and analysis of 
     records captured from countries, organizations, and 
     individuals, now or once hostile to the United States, with 
     rigid adherence to academic freedom and integrity.
       ``(2) Consistent with the protection of national security 
     information, personally identifiable information, and 
     intelligence sources and methods, to make a significant 
     portion of these records available to researchers as quickly 
     and responsibly as possible while taking into account the 
     integrity of the academic process and risks to innocents or 
     third parties.
       ``(3) To conduct and disseminate research and analysis to 
     increase the understanding of factors related to 
     international relations, counterterrorism, and conventional 
     and unconventional warfare and, ultimately, enhance national 
     security.
       ``(4) To collaborate with members of academic and broad 
     national security communities, both domestic and 
     international, on research, conferences, seminars, and other 
     information exchanges to identify topics of importance for 
     the leadership of the United States Government and the 
     scholarly community.
       ``(c) Concurrence of the Director of National 
     Intelligence.--The Secretary of Defense shall seek the 
     concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence to the 
     extent the efforts and activities of the Center involve the 
     entities referred to in subsection (b)(4).
       ``(d) Support From Other United States Government 
     Departments or Agencies.--The head of any non-Department of 
     Defense department or agency of the United States Government 
     may--
       ``(1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services, 
     including personnel support, to support the operations of the 
     Center; and
       ``(2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to support 
     the operations of the Center.
       ``(e) Acceptance of Gifts and Donations.--(1) Subject to 
     paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any 
     source specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for 
     purposes of defraying the costs or enhancing the operations 
     of the Center.
       ``(2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the 
     following:
       ``(A) The government of a State or a political subdivision 
     of a State.
       ``(B) The government of a foreign country.
       ``(C) A foundation or other charitable organization, 
     including a foundation or charitable organization that is 
     organized or operates under the laws of a foreign country.
       ``(D) Any source in the private sector of the United States 
     or a foreign country.
       ``(3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under 
     this subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would 
     compromise or appear to compromise--
       ``(A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any 
     employee of the Department, or any member of the armed forces 
     to carry out the responsibility or duty of the Department in 
     a fair and objective manner; or
       ``(B) the integrity of any program of the Department or of 
     any person involved in such a program.
       ``(4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting 
     forth the criteria to be used in determining the 
     applicability of paragraph (3) to any proposed gift or 
     donation under this subsection.
       ``(f) Crediting of Funds Transferred or Accepted.--Funds 
     transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under 
     this section shall be credited to appropriations available to 
     the Department of Defense for the Center, and shall be 
     available for the same purposes, and subject to the same 
     conditions and limitations, as the appropriations with which 
     merged. Any funds so transferred or accepted shall remain 
     available until expended.
       ``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `captured record' means a document, audio 
     file, video file, or other material captured during combat 
     operations from countries, organizations, or individuals, now 
     or once hostile to the United States.
       ``(2) The term `gift or donation' means any gift or 
     donation of funds, materials (including research materials), 
     real or personal property, or services (including lecture 
     services and faculty services).''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by 
     inserting after the item relating to section 426 the 
     following new item:

``427. Conflict Records Research Center.''.

     SEC. 1062. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MILITARY 
                   TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO CERTAIN OTHER 
                   AGENCIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   REIMBURSEMENT RATE.

       (a) In General.--Section 2642(a) of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``airlift'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``transportation''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) by striking ``October 28, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2019'';
       (B) by inserting and ``military transportation services 
     provided in support of foreign military sales'' after 
     ``Department of Defense''; and
       (C) by striking ``air industry'' and inserting 
     ``transportation industry''.

[[Page 8948]]

       (b) Technical Amendment.--The heading for such section is 
     amended by striking ``Airlift'' and inserting 
     ``Transportation''.
       (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking 
     the item relating to section 2642 and inserting the following 
     new item:

``2642. Transportation services provided to certain other agencies: use 
              of Department of Defense reimbursement rates''.

     SEC. 1063. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
                   MODIFICATION OF FORCE STRUCTURE OF THE ARMY.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     Department of the Army may be used to modify the force 
     structure or basing strategy of the Army until the Secretary 
     of the Army--
       (1) submits to Congress the report on force structure 
     required by section 1066 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 1943); and
       (2) provides to the congressional defense committees a 
     briefing on the most recent force mix analysis conducted by 
     the Secretary, including--
       (A) the assumptions and scenarios used to determine the 
     type and mix of Brigade Combat Teams;
       (B) the rationale for the recommended force mix; and
       (C) the risks involved with the recommended force mix.

     SEC. 1064. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE 
                   COOPERATION ACTIVITIES.

       No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available to the Department of Defense by this Act or any 
     other Act may be obligated or expended on any public-private 
     cooperation activity undertaken by a combatant command until 
     the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of 
     the House of Representatives the report on the conclusions of 
     the Defense Business Board that the Secretary was directed to 
     provide under the Report of the Committee on Armed Services 
     to accompany H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress (H. Rept. 112-
     479).

                    Subtitle H--Studies and Reports

     SEC. 1071. OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES.

       Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting 
     ``and the congressional defense committees'' after ``the 
     Secretary of Defense''.

     SEC. 1072. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL REPORT OF DESCRIPTION OF 
                   INTERAGENCY COORDINATION RELATING TO 
                   HUMANITARIAN DEMINING TECHNOLOGY.

       Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting 
     ``; and''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(5) a description of interagency efforts to coordinate 
     and improve research, development, test, and evaluation for 
     humanitarian demining technology and mechanical clearance 
     methods, including the transfer of relevant counter-
     improvised explosive device technology with potential 
     humanitarian demining applications.''.

     SEC. 1073. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL 
                   REPORT ON ASSIGNMENT OF CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF 
                   THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AS ADVISORS TO 
                   FOREIGN MINISTRIES OF DEFENSE.

       Section 1081(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law. 112-81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 
     U.S.C. 168 note) is amended by striking ``December 30, 2013'' 
     and inserting ``December 30, 2014''.

     SEC. 1074. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL 
                   ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   EFFICIENCIES.

       Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1582) is 
     repealed.

     SEC. 1075. MATTERS FOR INCLUSION IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE 
                   2013 QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.

       (a) In General.--For purposes of conducting the assessment 
     of the 2013 quadrennial defense review under section 118 of 
     title 10, United States Code, the National Defense Panel 
     established under subsection (f) of such section (hereinafter 
     in this section referred to as the ``Panel'') shall--
       (1) conduct an assessment of the recommendation included in 
     the assessment of the 2009 quadrennial defense review under 
     such section regarding the establishment of a standing, 
     independent strategic review panel;
       (2) include in the report required by paragraph (7) of such 
     subsection the recommendations of the Panel regarding the 
     establishment of such a standing panel; and
       (3) take into consideration the Strategic Choices and 
     Management Review directed by the Secretary of Defense during 
     2013, particularly in carrying out the responsibilities of 
     the Panel under clauses (i), (ii), and (v) of paragraph (5) 
     of such subsection.
       (b) Updates From Secretary of Defense.--In providing 
     updates to the panel regarding the 2013 quadrennial defense 
     review under paragraph (8) of such subsection, or providing 
     information requested by the panel pursuant to paragraph 
     (9)(A) of such subsection, the Secretary of Defense or head 
     of the department or agency, as appropriate, shall also 
     provide information related to the Strategic Choices and 
     Management Review.

     SEC. 1076. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES SPECIAL 
                   OPERATIONS FORCES AND UNITED STATES SPECIAL 
                   OPERATIONS COMMAND.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 
     review of the United States Special Operations Forces 
     organization, capabilities, and structure.
       (b) Report.--Not later than the date on which the budget of 
     the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) 
     of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report on the review conducted under 
     subsection (a). Such report shall include an analysis of each 
     of the following:
       (1) The organizational structure of the United States 
     Special Operations Command and each subordinate component, as 
     in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (2) The policy and civilian oversight structures for 
     Special Operations Forces within the Department of Defense, 
     as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act, 
     including the statutory structures and responsibilities of 
     the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Special Operations 
     and Low Intensity Conflict within the Department.
       (3) The roles and responsibilities of United States Special 
     Operations Command and Special Operations Forces under 
     section 167 of title 10, United States Code.
       (4) Current and future special operations peculiar 
     requirements of the commanders of the geographic combatant 
     commands, Theater Special Operations Commands, and command 
     relationships between United States Special Operations 
     Command and the geographic combatant commands.
       (5) The funding authorities, uses, and oversight mechanisms 
     of Major Force Program-11.
       (6) Changes to structure, authorities, oversight 
     mechanisms, Major Force Program-11 funding, roles, and 
     responsibilities assumed in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense 
     Review.
       (7) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines 
     are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and 
     assessment.
       (c) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date on 
     which the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the 
     Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such 
     review shall include an assessment of United States Special 
     Operations Forces organization, capabilities, and force 
     structure with respect to conventional force structures and 
     national military strategies.

     SEC. 1077. REPORTS ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

       (a) Report on Collaboration, Demonstration, and Use Cases 
     and Data Sharing.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the 
     Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal 
     Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the 
     National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of 
     the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit jointly to the 
     appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the 
     following:
       (1) The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial fielding 
     of unmanned aircraft systems at test sites within and outside 
     of restricted airspace.
       (2) The progress being made to develop public and civil 
     sense-and-avoid and command-and-control technology.
       (3) An assessment on the sharing of operational, 
     programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned aircraft 
     systems operations by the Federal Aviation Administration, 
     the Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and 
     Space Administration to help the Federal Aviation 
     Administration establish civil unmanned aircraft systems 
     certification standards, pilot certification and licensing, 
     and air traffic control procedures, including identifying the 
     locations selected to collect, analyze, and store the data.
       (b) Report on Resource Requirements Needed for Unmanned 
     Aircraft Systems Described in the Five-year Roadmap.--Not 
     later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive 
     Committee, shall submit to the appropriate committees of 
     Congress a report setting forth the resource requirements 
     needed to meet the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems 
     integration described in the five-year roadmap under section 
     332(a)(5) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act (Public Law 
     112-95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Committee on 
     Appropriations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Science, 
     Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations of 
     the House of Representatives.

[[Page 8949]]

       (2) The term ``UAS Executive Committee'' means the 
     Department of Defense-Federal Aviation Administration 
     executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the 
     Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4596) established by 
     the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the Federal 
     Aviation Administration.

     SEC. 1078. ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS SUBMITTED TO 
                   CONGRESS.

       (a) In General.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 122a of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(1) made available on a publicly accessible Internet 
     website of the Department of Defense; and''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
     shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1079. PROVISION OF DEFENSE PLANNING GUIDANCE AND 
                   CONTINGENCY OPERATION PLAN INFORMATION TO 
                   CONGRESS.

       (a) In General.--Section 113(g) of title 10, United States 
     Code is amended by adding at the end, the following new 
     paragraph:
       ``(3) At the time of the budget submission by the President 
     for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
     the congressional defense committees an annual report 
     containing summaries of the guidance developed under 
     paragraphs (1) and (2), as well as summaries of any plans 
     developed in accordance with the guidance developed under 
     paragraph (2). Such summaries shall be sufficient to allow 
     the congressional defense committees to evaluate fully the 
     requirements for military forces, acquisition programs, and 
     operations and maintenance funding in the President's annual 
     budget request for the Department of Defense.''.
       (b) Report Required.--Notwithstanding the requirement under 
     paragraph (3) of section 113(g) of title 10, United States 
     Code, as added by subsection (a), that the Secretary of 
     Defense submit reports under that paragraph at the time of 
     the President's annual budget submission, the Secretary shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees the first 
     report required under that paragraph by not later than 120 
     days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
       (c) Limitation on Obligation of Funds Pending Report.--Of 
     the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for 
     Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for the office of 
     the Secretary of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be 
     obligated or expended before the date that is 15 days after 
     the date on which the Secretary submits the report described 
     in subsection (b).

                       Subtitle I--Other Matters

     SEC. 1081. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.

       (a) Title 10.--Title 10, United States Code, is amended as 
     follows:
       (1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, 
     and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each 
     amended by striking the item relating to chapter 24 and 
     inserting the following:

24. Nuclear Posture.............................................491....

       (2) Section 122a(a) is amended by striking ``subsection (b) 
     is'' and inserting ``subsection (b) is--''.
       (3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 130e and 
     inserting the following new item:

``130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical 
              infrastructure security information.''.

       (4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and 
     inserting the following new item:

``231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and 
              certification.''.

       (5) Section 231a(a) is amended by striking ``fiscal year of 
     Defense'' and inserting ``fiscal year, the Secretary of 
     Defense''.
       (6) Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the end of 
     the enumerator of section 498.
       (7) Section 494(c) is amended by striking ``the date of the 
     enactment of this Act'' each place it appears and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2011''.
       (8) Section 673(a) is amended by inserting ``of the Uniform 
     Code of Military Justice'' after ``120c''.
       (9) Section 1401a is amended by striking ``before the 
     enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2008'' in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting 
     ``before January 28, 2008''.
       (10) Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a period 
     at the end.
       (11) Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking ``the 
     a'' and inserting ``the''.
       (b) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013.--Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included 
     therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) is amended as 
     follows:
       (1) Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by 
     striking ``Section 2366b(A)(3)(F)'' and inserting ``Section 
     2366b(a)(3)(F)''.
       (2) Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by 
     striking ``subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and 
     (h), respectively'' and inserting ``subsection (f) as 
     subsection (g)''.
       (3) Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking 
     ``Section 408a(e)'' and inserting ``Section 478a(e)''.
       (4) Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by striking 
     ``such Act'' and inserting ``such section''.
       (5) Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat.1918) is amended by 
     striking the subclause (III) immediately below clause (iv).
       (6) Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat.1919) is amended by 
     striking ``Section 1031(b)'' and inserting ``Section 
     1041(b)''.
       (7) Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat.1969) is amended by 
     striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``paragraph (2)''.
       (8) Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by 
     striking ``fiscal'' both places it appears and inserting 
     ``Fiscal''.
       (9) Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended--
       (A) in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking ``inserting `; 
     and';'' and inserting ``inserting a semicolon;''; and
       (B) in subsection (i), by inserting after ``it appears'' 
     the following: ``(except in those places in which 
     `Administrator of FEMA' already appears)''.
       (c) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012.--Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included 
     therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) is amended as 
     follows:
       (1) Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended by 
     striking ``subsection (D)'' and inserting ``subsection (d)''.
       (2) Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) 
     is amended ``experts sexual'' and inserting ``experts in 
     sexual''.
       (d) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2004.--Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 10 U.S.C. 5013 
     note), as most recently amended by section 321 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1694), is amended by striking 
     ``subsection 4703'' and inserting ``section 4703''.
       (e) Amendment to Title 41.--Section 4712(i) is amended by 
     inserting before ``the enactment'' the following: ``that is 
     180 days after the date''.
       (f) Coordination With Other Amendments Made by This Act.--
     For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of 
     this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this 
     section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately 
     before any amendment made by other provisions of this Act.

     SEC. 1082. TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES FOR THE UNITED STATES 
                   BY AIRCRAFT OPERATED BY UNITED STATES AIR 
                   CARRIERS.

       (a) Department of Defense.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 157 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the 
     following new section:

     ``Sec. 2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft

       ``(a) Preference.--Only aircraft owned by the United 
     States, or aircraft operated by or under the supervision of 
     United States air carriers holding a certificate under 
     section 41102 of title 49 and registered in the Civil Reserve 
     Air Fleet, may be used for the transportation by air of 
     supplies on behalf of any component of the Department of 
     Defense. However, if the President finds that the rates 
     charged for the use of those aircraft is excessive or 
     otherwise unreasonable, contracts for transportation may be 
     made as otherwise provided by law. Charges made for the 
     transportation of those supplies by those aircraft may not be 
     higher than the charges made for transporting like goods for 
     private persons.
       ``(b) Outsize and Oversize Cargoes.--(1) The preference 
     under subsection (a) shall not apply to outsize or oversize 
     cargoes if no air carrier registered in the Civil Reserve Air 
     Fleet nor any aircraft owned by the United States is capable 
     and available of transporting such a cargo.
       ``(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the 
     maximum extent practicable, outsize and oversize cargoes are 
     transported by aircraft owned and operated by the United 
     States or by air carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
       ``(3) Not later than March 30 of each year, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees a report on outsize and oversize cargo flights. 
     Each such report shall include, for the year covered by the 
     report, each of the following:
       ``(A) The number of outsize and oversize cargo flights, 
     including the number of flights and tonnage of each flight, 
     flown both by aircraft owned and operated by the United 
     States and by carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
       ``(B) For any cargo carried by aircraft that is neither 
     owned and operated by the United States nor by an air carrier 
     in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, an explanation for the use of 
     such a carrier.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 2631a the following new item:

``2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft.''.

       (b) Other Departments and Agencies.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 401 of title 49, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     section:

     ``Sec. 40131. Air transportation procured by the United 
       States Government

       ``(a) Guarantee.--Consistent with the provisions of section 
     40118 of title 49, when the United States procures, enters 
     into a contract for, or otherwise obtains for its own 
     account, or furnishes to or for the account of a foreign 
     country, organization, or person without provision for 
     reimbursement, any equipment, materials, or commodities, or 
     provides financing in

[[Page 8950]]

     any way with Federal funds for the account of any person 
     unless otherwise exempted, within or without the United 
     States, or advances funds or credits, or guarantees the 
     convertibility of foreign currencies in connection with the 
     furnishing or obtaining of the equipment, materials, or 
     commodities, the appropriate agencies shall take steps 
     necessary and practicable to ensure that at least 50 percent 
     of the gross tonnage of the equipment, materials, or 
     commodities which may be transported on fixed wing aircraft 
     are transported on privately-owned commercial aircraft that 
     are owned, operated, or otherwise supervised by air carriers 
     holding a certificate under section 41102 of this title and 
     registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, to the extent 
     those aircraft are appropriate and available at fair and 
     reasonable rates.
       ``(b) Exception.--
       ``(1) In general.--The requirements of this section shall 
     not apply to any equipment, materials, or commodities 
     transported for the use of the military services of the 
     United States or to respond to a humanitarian disaster.
       ``(2) Humanitarian disaster defined.--For purposes of this 
     subsection, the term `humanitarian disaster' means a man-made 
     or natural occurrence that causes loss of life, health, 
     property, or livelihood, inflicting severe destruction and 
     distress.
       ``(c) Waiver.--
       ``(1) In general.--The President, the Secretary of 
     Transportation, or the Secretary of State, in coordination 
     with the Secretary of Defense, as appropriate, may issue a 
     temporary waiver of this section--
       ``(A) to respond to an emergency; or
       ``(B) if such a waiver is in the national interests of the 
     United States.
       ``(2) Committee notice.--The President, the Secretary of 
     Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as appropriate, 
     shall notify the following Committees within 30 days of 
     exercising a waiver under paragraph (1):
       ``(A) The Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations 
     of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
       ``(B) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
     Transportation of the Senate.
       ``(C) The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
     the House of Representatives.
       ``(D) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
       ``(E) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.
       ``(3) Expiration and renewal of waiver.--Any waiver issued 
     under paragraph (1) shall expire not later than 180 days 
     after the date on which it is issued. The President, the 
     Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as 
     appropriate, may renew an expired or expiring waiver as long 
     as the President or Secretary provides notice to the 
     committees referred to in paragraph (2) in accordance with 
     that paragraph.
       ``(d) Regulations.--Each department or agency of the 
     Government shall administer its air transport operations 
     according to regulations and guidance issued by the Secretary 
     of Transportation.
       ``(e) Enforcement.--The Secretary of Transportation may 
     impose on any person violating this section, or a regulation 
     issued under this section, a civil penalty of up to $25,000 
     for each violation knowingly committed, with each day of a 
     continuing violation following the initial shipment to be a 
     separate violation.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new item:

``40131. Air transportation procured by the United States 
              Government.''.

     SEC. 1083. REDUCTION IN COSTS TO REPORT CRITICAL CHANGES TO 
                   MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS.

       (a) Extension of a Program Defined.--Section 2445a of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new subsection:
       ``(g) Extension of a Program.--In this chapter, the term 
     `extension of a program' means, with respect to a major 
     automated information system program or other major 
     information technology investment program, the further 
     deployment or planned deployment to additional users of the 
     system which has already been found operationally effective 
     and suitable by an independent test agency or the Director of 
     Operational Test and Evaluation, beyond the scope planned in 
     the original estimate or information originally submitted on 
     the program.''.
       (b) Reports on Critical Changes in MAIS Programs.--
     Subsection (d) of section 2445c of such title is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and 
     inserting ``paragraph (3)'';
       (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
       (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
     paragraph (2):
       ``(2) Notification when variance due to congressional 
     action or extension of program.--If a senior Department of 
     Defense official who, following receipt of a quarterly report 
     described in paragraph (1) and making a determination 
     described in paragraph (3), also determines that the 
     circumstances resulting in the determination described in 
     paragraph (3) either (A) are primarily the result of 
     congressional action, or (B) are primarily due to an 
     extension of a program, the official may, in lieu of carrying 
     out an evaluation and submitting a report in accordance with 
     paragraph (1), submit to the congressional defense 
     committees, within 45 days after receiving the quarterly 
     report, a notification that the official has made those 
     determinations. If such a notification is submitted, the 
     limitation in subsection (g)(1) does not apply with respect 
     to that determination under paragraph (3).''.
       (c) Conforming Cross-reference Amendment.--Subsection 
     (g)(1) of such section is amended by striking ``subsection 
     (d)(2)'' and inserting ``subsection (d)(3)''.
       (d) Total Acquisition Cost Information.--Title 10, United 
     States Code, is further amended--
       (1) in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking ``development 
     costs'' and inserting ``total acquisition costs''; and
       (2) in section 2445c--
       (A) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2), by striking 
     ``program development cost'' and inserting ``total 
     acquisition cost''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3) (as 
     redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by striking ``program 
     development cost'' and inserting ``total acquisition cost''.
       (e) Clarification of Cross-reference.--Section 2445c(g)(2) 
     of such title is amended by striking ``in compliance with the 
     requirements of subsection (d)(2)'' and inserting ``under 
     subsection (d)(1)(B)''.

     SEC. 1084. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF 
                   TRANSPORTATION TO ISSUE NON-PREMIUM AVIATION 
                   INSURANCE.

        Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
     authority'';
       (2) by striking ``this chapter'' and inserting ``any 
     provision of this chapter other than section 44305''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Insurance of United States Government Property.--The 
     authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide 
     insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or 
     instrumentality of the United States Government under section 
     44305 is not effective after December 31, 2018.''.

     SEC. 1085. REVISION OF COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF THE 
                   NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE AIR 
                   FORCE.

       (a) Revision.--Section 365(a) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat.1705) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``shall be compensated'' and inserting 
     ``may be compensated'';
       (2) by striking ``equal to'' and inserting ``not to 
     exceed''; and
       (3) by inserting ``of $155,400'' after ``annual rate''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
     shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty performed 
     on or after April 2, 2013.

     SEC. 1086. PROTECTION OF TIER ONE TASK CRITICAL ASSETS FROM 
                   ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE AND HIGH-POWERED 
                   MICROWAVE SYSTEMS.

       (a) Certification Required.--Not later than June 1, 2014, 
     the Secretary of the Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees certification that defense 
     critical assets designated as tier one task critical assets 
     (hereinafter referred to as ``TCAs'') are protected from the 
     adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring 
     electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. Any 
     such assets found not to be so protected shall be included in 
     the plan required under subsection (b).
       (b) Plan Required.--Not later than January 1, 2015, the 
     Secretary of the Defense shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a plan for tier one TCAs to receive 
     electricity by means that are protected from the adverse 
     effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic 
     pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. The plan shall 
     include the following elements:
       (1) An analysis of how the Department of Defense plans to 
     mitigate any risks to mission assurance for non-certified 
     tier one TCAs, including any steps that may be needed for 
     remediation.
       (2) The development or adoption by the Department of a 
     standard of resistance or protection against man-made and 
     natural electromagnetic threats for electricity sources that 
     supply electricity to tier one TCAs.
       (3) The development by the Department of a strategy to 
     certify by December 31, 2015, that all electricity sourced to 
     tier one TCAs is provided by facilities that meet the 
     standard developed under paragraph (2).
       (c) Preparation of Plan.--In preparing the plan required by 
     subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall use the 
     guidance and recommendations of the Commission to Assess the 
     Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack 
     established by section 1401 of the Floyd D. Spence National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted 
     into law by Public Law 106-398; 114. Stat. 1654A-345).
       (d) Form of Submission.--The plan required by subsection 
     (b) shall be submitted in classified form.
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``task critical asset'' means an asset of such 
     extraordinary importance to operations in peace, crisis, and 
     war that its incapacitation or destruction would have a 
     debilitating effect on the ability of the Department of 
     Defense to fulfill its missions.
       (2) The term ``tier one'' with respect to a task critical 
     asset means such an asset the loss, incapacitation, or 
     disruption of which could result

[[Page 8951]]

     in mission (or function) failure at the Department of 
     Defense, military department, combatant command, sub-unified 
     command, Defense Agency, or defense infrastructure sector 
     level.

     SEC. 1087. STRATEGY FOR FUTURE MILITARY INFORMATION 
                   OPERATIONS CAPABILITIES.

       (a) Strategy Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     develop and implement a strategy for developing and 
     sustaining military information operations capabilities for 
     future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such 
     strategy to the congressional defense committees by not later 
     than February 1, 2014.
       (b) Contents of Strategy.--The strategy required in 
     subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
       (1) A plan for the sustainment of existing capabilities 
     that have been developed during the ten-year period prior to 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, including such 
     capabilities developed using funds authorized to be 
     appropriated for overseas contingency operations.
       (2) A discussion of how the capabilities referred to in 
     paragraph (1) are being integrated into both operational 
     plans (OPLANS) and contingency plans (CONPLANS).
       (3) An assessment of the force structure that is necessary 
     to support operational planning and potential contingency 
     operations, including the relative balance across the active 
     and reserve components.
       (4) Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to 
     support the force structure referred to in paragraph (3), as 
     well as estimates for resources that might be needed based on 
     selected OPLANS and CONPLANS.
       (5) A description of how new and emerging technologies can 
     be incorporated into the projected force structure and future 
     OPLANS and CONPLANS.
       (6) A description of new capabilities that may be needed to 
     fill any identified gaps and programs that might be required 
     to develop such capabilities.

     SEC. 1088. COMPLIANCE OF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS WITH MINIMUM 
                   SAFE STAFFING STANDARDS.

       In implementing the sequester required by section 251A of 
     the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
     1985, as ordered on March 1, 2013, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall ensure that all military departments remain fully 
     compliant with minimum safe staffing standards, as outlined 
     in the Department of Defense Fire and Emergency Services 
     Program (DoD Instruction 6055.06).

     SEC. 1089. DETERMINATION AND DISCLOSURE OF TRANSPORTATION 
                   COSTS INCURRED BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR 
                   CONGRESSIONAL TRIPS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

       (a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary.--In 
     the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of 
     the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out 
     official duties outside the United States for which the 
     Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall--
       (1) determine the cost of the transportation provided with 
     respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
       (2) not later than 10 days after completion of the trip 
     involved, provide a written statement of the cost--
       (A) to the Member, officer, or employee involved, and
       (B) to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
     Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, 
     officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a 
     Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
       (3) upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), 
     make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary's 
     official public website until the expiration of the 4-year 
     period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
       (b) Exceptions.--
       (1) Exceptions described.--This section does not apply with 
     respect to any trip for which any of the following applies:
       (A) The purpose of the trip is to visit one or more United 
     States military installations or to visit United States 
     military personnel in a war zone (or both).
       (B) The use of transportation provided by the Department of 
     Defense is necessary to protect the safety and security of 
     the individuals taking the trip.
       (2) Consultation.--In determining whether or not a trip is 
     described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall 
     consult with the Speaker of the House of Representatives (in 
     the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of 
     the House) or the Majority Leader of the Senate (in the case 
     of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the 
     Senate).
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Member.--The term ``Member'', with respect to the House 
     of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident 
     Commissioner to the Congress.
       (2) United states.--The term ``United States'' means the 
     several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of 
     Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
     Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any 
     other territory or possession of the United States.
       (d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect 
     to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to 
     any trip which began prior to such date.

                  TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

     SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 
                   LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE 
                   LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN 
                   EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS.

       Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan 
     Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently 
     amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 
     1973), is further amended by striking ``through 2013'' and 
     inserting ``through 2014''.

     SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO 
                   GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO 
                   PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE.

       Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency 
     Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War 
     on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234; 
     120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 
     (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently 
     amended by section 1104 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 125 Stat. 
     1973), is further amended by striking ``2014'' and inserting 
     ``2015''.

     SEC. 1103. EXTENSION OF VOLUNTARY REDUCTION-IN-FORCE 
                   AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF DEPARTMENT 
                   OF DEFENSE.

       Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``September 30, 2015''.

     SEC. 1104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE LUMP-SUM SEVERANCE 
                   PAYMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES.

       Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``October 1, 2014'' and inserting 
     ``October 1, 2018''.

     SEC. 1105. REVISION TO AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND 
                   RESEARCH FOR TRANSFORMATION (SMART) DEFENSE 
                   EDUCATION PROGRAM.

       Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of title 10, United 
     States Code, is amended by striking ``the amount determined'' 
     and all that follows through ``room and board'' and inserting 
     ``an amount determined by the Secretary of Defense''.

     SEC. 1106. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION-
                   TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL.

       (a) In General.--Section 1110(d) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) 
     is amended by striking ``2013.'' and inserting ``2023.''.
       (b) Reporting Requirement.--Section 1110(i) of such Act is 
     amended by striking ``2015,'' and inserting ``2024,''.

     SEC. 1107. DEFENSE SCIENCE INITIATIVE FOR PERSONNEL.

       (a) Statement of Policy.--It is the policy of the United 
     States to assure the scientific and technological preeminence 
     of its defense laboratories, which are essential to the 
     national security, by requiring the Department of Defense to 
     provide to its science and technology laboratories--
       (1) the personnel and support services needed to carry out 
     their mission; and
       (2) decentralized management authority.
       (b) Establishment of Initiative.--There is hereby 
     established within the Department of Defense a program to be 
     known as the Defense Science Initiative for Personnel 
     (hereinafter in this section referred to as the 
     ``Initiative'').
       (c) Laboratories Covered by Initiative.--The laboratories 
     covered by the Initiative--
       (1) shall be those designated as Science and Technology 
     Reinvention Laboratories (hereinafter in this section 
     referred to as ``STRLs'') by the Secretary or by paragraph 
     (2); and
       (2) shall include the laboratories enumerated in section 
     1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), which laboratories are 
     hereby designated as STRLs.
       (d) Science and Engineering Degreed and Technical Positions 
     at STRLs.--
       (1) In general.--The director of any STRL may appoint 
     qualified candidates, without regard to sections 3309-3319 of 
     title 5, United States Code, directly to scientific, 
     technical, engineering, mathematical, or medical positions 
     within such STRL, on either a temporary, term, or permanent 
     basis.
       (2) Qualified candidate defined.--Notwithstanding any 
     provision of chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code, for 
     purposes of this subsection, the term ``qualified candidate'' 
     means an individual who is--
       (A) a candidate who has earned a bachelor's or master's 
     degree;
       (B) a student enrolled in a program of undergraduate or 
     graduate instruction leading to a bachelor's or master's 
     degree in a scientific, technical, engineering, mathematical, 
     or medical course of study at an institution of higher 
     education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the 
     Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)); or
       (C) a veteran, as defined in section 2108 of title 5, 
     United States Code, who served in the armed forces in an 
     engineering, scientific, or medical technician occupational 
     specialty.

[[Page 8952]]

       (3) Rule of construction.--Any exercise of authority under 
     paragraph (1) shall be considered to satisfy section 
     2301(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
       (e) Exclusion From Personnel Limitations, etc.--The 
     director of any STRL shall manage the workforce strength of 
     such STRL--
       (1) without regard to any limitation on appointments or any 
     allocation of positions with respect to such STRL, subject to 
     paragraph (2); and
       (2) in a manner consistent with the budget available with 
     respect to such STRL.
       (f) Senior Executive Service Rotation Authority.--Section 
     3131 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``mission;'' and 
     inserting ``mission, subject to paragraph (15);'';
       (2) in paragraph (13), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (3) in paragraph (14), by striking the period and inserting 
     ``; and''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(15) permit the director of each Science and Technology 
     Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014) 
     to determine the duration of appointments for senior 
     executives (which shall in no event be less than 5 years), 
     consistent with carrying out the mission of that 
     laboratory.''.
       (g) Senior Scientific Technical Managers.--
       (1) Establishment.--There is hereby established in each 
     STRL a category of senior professional scientific positions, 
     the incumbents of which shall be designated as ``senior 
     scientific technical managers'' and which shall be positions 
     classified above GS-15 of the General Schedule pursuant to 
     section 5108 of title 5, United States Code. The primary 
     functions of such positions shall be--
       (A) to engage in research and development in the physical, 
     biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or another 
     field closely related to the mission of such STRL; and
       (B) to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities.
       (2) Appointments.--The positions described in paragraph (1) 
     may be filled, and shall be managed, by the director of the 
     STRL involved, under criteria established pursuant to section 
     342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to 
     personnel demonstration projects at laboratories of the 
     Department of Defense, except that the director of the 
     laboratory involved shall determine the number of such 
     positions at such laboratory, not to exceed 3 percent of the 
     number of scientists and engineers (determined on a full-time 
     equivalent basis) employed at such laboratory at the end of 
     the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which any 
     appointments subject to that numerical limitation are made.
       (h) Selection and Compensation of Specially-qualified 
     Scientific and Professional Personnel.--Section 3104 of title 
     5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
     following new subsection:
       ``(d) In addition to the number of positions authorized by 
     subsection (a), the director of each Science and Technology 
     Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014), 
     may establish, without regard to the second sentence of 
     subsection (a), such number of scientific or professional 
     positions as may be necessary to carry out the research and 
     development functions of the laboratory and which require the 
     services of specially-qualified personnel. The selection 
     process governing appointments made under this subsection 
     shall be determined by the director of the laboratory 
     involved, and the rate of basic pay for the employee holding 
     any such position shall be set by the laboratory director at 
     a rate not to exceed the rate for level II of the Executive 
     Schedule.''.

             TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

                  Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

     SEC. 1201. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING 
                   TO PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF FOREIGN 
                   MILITARY FORCES.

       (a) Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 
     (Public Law 109-163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently 
     amended by section 1206 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 
     122 Stat. 4625), is further amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the end;
       (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; or''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(C) support the theater security priorities of a 
     Geographic Combatant Commander.''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country's security 
     forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.''.
       (b) Annual Funding Limitation.--Subsection (c)(1) of 
     section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2006, as so amended, is further amended by 
     striking ``$350,000,000'' and inserting ``$425,000,000''.
       (c) Notification of Planning and Execution of Funds.--
     Subsection (e) of section 1206 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most recently 
     amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 
     1979), is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4);
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
     paragraph:
       ``(3) Notification of planning and execution of funds.--In 
     the budget materials submitted to the President by the 
     Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to 
     Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States 
     Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2016, and each subsequent 
     fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall include the 
     following:
       ``(A) For programs to be conducted or supported under 
     subsection (a) (other than subsection (a)(1)(C)) for such 
     fiscal year, a description of the proposed planning and 
     execution of not less than 50 percent of the total amount of 
     funds to be made available for such programs.
       ``(B) For programs to be conducted or supported under 
     subsection (a)(1)(C) for such fiscal year, a description of 
     the proposed planning and execution of 100 percent of the 
     total amount of funds to be made available for such 
     programs.''; and
       (3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), as so 
     redesignated, by striking ``Committee on International 
     Relations'' and inserting ``Committee on Foreign Affairs''.
       (d) Termination of Program.--Subsection (g) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most 
     recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended by 
     striking ``2014'' each place it appears and inserting 
     ``2016''.
       (e) Repeal of Authority to Build the Capacity of Certain 
     Counterterrorism Forces in Yemen and East Africa.--Section 
     1203 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1980) is hereby 
     repealed.

     SEC. 1202. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-
                   CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES.

       Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 
     122 Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by 
     striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2016''.

     SEC. 1203. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND.

       (a) Authority.--Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is 
     amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting 
     ``or regions'' after ``countries''; and
       (2) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
     ``and other national security forces'' and inserting ``or 
     other national security forces''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (A)--
       (i) by striking ``and counterterrorism operations'' and 
     inserting ``or counterterrorism operations''; and
       (ii) by striking ``and'' at the end and inserting ``or''.
       (b) Notices to Congress.--Subsection (l) of such section is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(l) Notices to Congress.--Not less than 30 days before 
     initiating an activity under a program of assistance under 
     subsection (b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 
     Defense shall jointly submit to the specified congressional 
     committees a notification that includes the following:
       ``(1) A request for the transfer of funds into the Fund 
     under subsection (f) or any other authority, including the 
     original source of the funds.
       ``(2) A detailed justification for the total anticipated 
     program plan for each country to include total anticipated 
     costs and the specific activities contained therein.
       ``(3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and 
     anticipated completion date for the activity.
       ``(4) A list of other security-related assistance or 
     justice sector and stabilization assistance that the United 
     States is currently providing the country concerned and that 
     is related to or supported by the activity.
       ``(5) Such other information relating to the program or 
     activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense 
     considers appropriate.''.
       (c) Transitional Authorities; Annual Reports; Guidance and 
     Processes for Exercise of Authority.--Such section, as so 
     amended, is further amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (n);
       (2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n); and
       (3) by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended, the 
     following new subsection:
       ``(m) Guidance and Processes for Exercise of Authority.--
     The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall 
     jointly submit a report to the specified congressional 
     committees 15 days after the date on which the necessary 
     guidance has been issued and processes for implementation of 
     the authority in subsection (b). The Secretary of State and 
     Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit additional reports 
     not later than 15 days after the date on which any future 
     modifications to the guidance and processes for 
     implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are 
     issued.''.
       (d) Funding.--Subsection (o) of such section is amended by 
     striking ``(o) Funding.--'' and all that follows through 
     ``(2) fiscal years 2013 and after.--'' and inserting ``(o) 
     Funding.--''.

[[Page 8953]]



     SEC. 1204. CODIFICATION OF NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) State Partnership Program.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, 
     is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 116. State Partnership Program

       ``(a) Purposes of Program.--The purposes of the State 
     Partnership Program of the National Guard are the following:
       ``(1) To support the objectives of the commander of the 
     combatant command for the theater of operations in which such 
     contacts and activities are conducted.
       ``(2) To support the objectives of the United States chief 
     of mission of the partner nation with which contacts and 
     activities are conducted.
       ``(3) To build international partnerships and defense and 
     security capacity.
       ``(4) To strengthen cooperation between the departments and 
     agencies of the United States Government and agencies of 
     foreign governments to support building of defense and 
     security capacity.
       ``(5) To facilitate intergovernmental collaboration between 
     the United States Government and foreign governments in the 
     areas of defense and security.
       ``(6) To facilitate and enhance the exchange of information 
     between the United States Government and foreign governments 
     on matters relating to defense and security.
       ``(b) Availability of Appropriated Funds for Program.--(1) 
     Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense, including 
     funds appropriated for the Air and Army National Guard, shall 
     be available for the payment of costs incurred by the 
     National Guard to conduct activities under the State 
     Partnership Program, whether those costs are incurred inside 
     or outside the United States.
       ``(2) Costs incurred by the National Guard and covered 
     under paragraph (1) may include the following:
       ``(A) Costs of pay and allowances of members of the 
     National Guard.
       ``(B) Travel and necessary expenses of United States 
     personnel outside of the Department of Defense in support of 
     the State Partnership Program.
       ``(C) Travel and necessary expenses of foreign participants 
     directly supporting activities under the State Partnership 
     Program.
       ``(c) Limitations on Use of Funds.--(1) Funds shall not be 
     available under subsection (b) for activities conducted in a 
     foreign country unless jointly approved by--
       ``(A) the commander of the combatant command concerned; and
       ``(B) the chief of mission concerned, with the concurrence 
     of the Secretary of State.
       ``(2) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for 
     the participation of a member of the National Guard in 
     activities in a foreign country unless the member is on 
     active duty in the armed forces at the time of such 
     participation.
       ``(3) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for 
     interagency activities involving United States civilian 
     personnel or foreign civilian personnel unless the 
     participation of such personnel in such activities--
       ``(A) contributes to responsible management of defense 
     resources;
       ``(B) fosters greater respect for and understanding of the 
     principle of civilian control of the military;
       ``(C) contributes to cooperation between the United States 
     armed forces and civilian governmental agencies and foreign 
     military and civilian government agencies; or
       ``(D) improves international partnerships and capacity on 
     matters relating to defense and security.
       ``(d) Reimbursement.--(1) In the event of the participation 
     of United States Government participants (other than 
     personnel of the Department of Defense) in activities for 
     which payment is made under subsection (b), the head of the 
     department or agency concerned shall reimburse the Secretary 
     of Defense for the costs associated with the participation of 
     such personnel in such contacts and activities.
       ``(2) Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall be 
     deposited in the appropriation or account from which amounts 
     for the payment concerned were derived. Any amounts so 
     deposited shall be merged with amounts in such appropriation 
     or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such appropriation or account.
       ``(e) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `State Partnership Program' means a program 
     that establishes a defense and security relationship between 
     the National Guard of a State or territory and the military 
     and security forces, and related disaster management, 
     emergency response, and security ministries, of a foreign 
     country.
       ``(2) The term `activities', for purposes of the State 
     Partnership Program, means any military-to-military 
     activities or interagency activities for a purpose set forth 
     in subsection (a)(1).
       ``(3) The term `interagency activities' means the 
     following:
       ``(A) Contacts between members of the National Guard and 
     foreign civilian personnel outside the ministry of defense of 
     the foreign country concerned on a matter within the core 
     competencies of the National Guard.
       ``(B) Contacts between United States civilian personnel and 
     members of the military and security forces of a foreign 
     country or foreign civilian personnel on a matter within the 
     core competencies of the National Guard.
       ``(4) The term `matter within the core competencies of the 
     National Guard' means matters with respect to the following:
       ``(A) Disaster response and mitigation.
       ``(B) Defense support to civil authorities.
       ``(C) Consequence management and installation protection.
       ``(D) Response to a chemical, biological, radiological, 
     nuclear, or explosives (CBRNE) event.
       ``(E) Border and port security and cooperation with 
     civilian law enforcement.
       ``(F) Search and rescue.
       ``(G) Medicine.
       ``(H) Counter-drug and counter-narcotics activities.
       ``(I) Public affairs.
       ``(J) Employer support and family support for reserve 
     forces.
       ``(5) The term `United States civilian personnel' means the 
     following:
       ``(A) Personnel of the United States Government (including 
     personnel of departments and agencies of the United States 
     Government other than the Department of Defense) and 
     personnel of State and local governments of the United 
     States.
       ``(B) Members and employees of the legislative branch of 
     the United States Government.
       ``(C) Non-governmental individuals.
       ``(6) The term `foreign civilian personnel' means the 
     following:
       ``(A) Civilian personnel of a foreign government at any 
     level (including personnel of ministries other than 
     ministries of defense).
       ``(B) Non-governmental individuals of a foreign country.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 1 of such title is amended by adding at 
     the end the following new item:

``116. State Partnership Program.''.

       (b) Repeal of Superseded Authority.--Section 1210 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
     (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is 
     repealed.

     SEC. 1205. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE 
                   CAPABILITY OF CERTAIN FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO 
                   RESPOND TO INCIDENTS INVOLVING WEAPONS OF MASS 
                   DESTRUCTION IN SYRIA AND THE REGION.

       (a) Authority.--The Secretary of Defense, with the 
     concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide assistance 
     to the military and civilian response organizations of 
     Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, 
     Turkey, and other countries in the region of Syria in order 
     for such countries to respond effectively to incidents 
     involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the 
     region.
       (b) Authorized Elements.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may include training, equipment, and supplies.
       (c) Availability of Funds for Activities Across Fiscal 
     Years.--The Secretary of Defense may use up to $4,000,000 of 
     the funds made available to the Department of Defense for 
     operation and maintenance for a fiscal year to carry out the 
     program authorized in subsection (a) and may provide 
     assistance under such program that begins in that fiscal year 
     but ends in the next fiscal year.
       (d) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the date on which 
     the authority of subsection (a) is first exercised, and 
     annually thereafter through December 31, 2015, the Secretary 
     of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives 
     an annual report to include at least the following:
       (1) A detailed description by country of assistance 
     provided.
       (2) An overview of how such assistance fits into, and is 
     coordinated with, other United States efforts to build the 
     capability and capacity of countries in the region of Syria 
     to counter the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Syria 
     and the region.
       (3) A listing of equipment and supplies provided to 
     countries in the region of Syria.
       (4) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of State determine appropriate.
       (e) Expiration.--The authority provided under subsection 
     (a) may not be exercised after September 30, 2015.

     SEC. 1206. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT FOREIGN 
                   FORCES PARTICIPATING IN OPERATIONS TO DISARM 
                   THE LORD'S RESISTANCE ARMY.

       (a) Funding.--Subsection (c)(1) of section 1206 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1624) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' and 
     inserting ``fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014''; and
       (2) by striking ``for operation and maintenance'' and 
     inserting ``to provide additional operation and maintenance 
     funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out 
     by the Armed Forces as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4302''.
       (b) Expiration.--Subsection (h) of such section is amended 
     by striking ``September 30, 2013'' and inserting ``September 
     30, 2014''.

    Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

     SEC. 1211. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY 
                   FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS 
                   FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY 
                   OPERATIONS.

       (a) Extension of Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1233 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2008 (Public Law

[[Page 8954]]

     110-181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 
     1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2000), is further 
     amended by striking ``for fiscal year 2013'' and inserting 
     ``for fiscal year 2014''.
       (b) Limitation on Amounts Available.--Subsection (d) of 
     such section, as so amended, is further amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``during fiscal year 2013 
     may not exceed $1,650,000,000'' and inserting ``during fiscal 
     year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``Fiscal Year 2013'' and 
     inserting ``Fiscal Year 2014''.
       (c) Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan in Fiscal Year 
     2014 Pending Certification on Pakistan.--
       (1) In general.--Effective as of the date of the enactment 
     of this Act, no amounts authorized to be appropriated by this 
     Act, and no amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years before fiscal year 2014 that remain available for 
     obligation, may be used for reimbursements of Pakistan under 
     the authority in subsection (a) of section 1233 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, as 
     amended by this section, until the Secretary of Defense 
     certifies to the congressional defense committees each of the 
     following:
       (A) That Pakistan is maintaining security and is not 
     through its actions or inactions at any level of government 
     limiting or otherwise restricting the movement of United 
     States equipment and supplies along the Ground Lines of 
     Communications (GLOCs) through Pakistan to Afghanistan so 
     that such equipment and supplies can be transshipped and such 
     equipment and supplies can be retrograded out of Afghanistan.
       (B) That Pakistan is taking demonstrable steps to--
       (i) support counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda, 
     Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremists 
     groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura 
     Taliban located in Pakistan;
       (ii) disrupt the conduct of cross-border attacks against 
     United States, coalition, and Afghanistan security forces 
     located in Afghanistan by such groups (including the Haqqani 
     Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban) from bases in Pakistan;
       (iii) counter the threat of improvised explosive devices, 
     including efforts to attack improvised explosive device 
     networks, monitor known precursors used in improvised 
     explosive devices, and systematically address the misuse of 
     explosive materials (including calcium ammonium nitrate) and 
     accessories and their supply to legitimate end-users in a 
     manner that impedes the flow of improvised explosive devices 
     and improvised explosive device components into Afghanistan; 
     and
       (iv) conduct cross-border coordination and communication 
     with Afghan security forces and United States Armed Forces in 
     Afghanistan.
       (2) Waiver authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     the limitation in paragraph (1) if the Secretary certifies to 
     the congressional defense committees in writing that the 
     waiver is in the national security interests of the United 
     States and includes with such certification a justification 
     for the waiver.

     SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR 
                   REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN.

       Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1218 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1990), is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$25,000,000''; and
       (B) by striking ``for fiscal year 2013'' and inserting 
     ``for fiscal year 2014''; and
       (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``December 31, 2013'' 
     and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.

     SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF COMMANDERS' EMERGENCY RESPONSE 
                   PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) One Year Extension.--
       (1) In general.--Section 1201 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 1992), is amended by striking ``fiscal 
     year 2013'' each place it appears and inserting ``fiscal year 
     2014''.
       (2) Conforming amendment.--The heading of subsection (a) of 
     such section is amended by striking ``Fiscal Year 2013'' and 
     inserting ``Fiscal Year 2014''.
       (b) Amount of Funds Available During Fiscal Year 2014.--
     Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking 
     ``$200,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.

     SEC. 1214. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND 
                   ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF SECURITY 
                   COOPERATION IN IRAQ.

       (a) Limitation on Amount.--Subsection (c) of section 1215 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1631), as amended by 
     section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1982), is 
     further amended by striking ``fiscal year 2012'' and all that 
     follows and inserting ``fiscal year 2014 may not exceed 
     $209,000,000.''.
       (b) Source of Funds.--Subsection (d) of such section, as so 
     amended, is further amended--
       (1) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013'' 
     and inserting ``fiscal year 2014''; and
       (2) by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may 
     be,'' and inserting ``that fiscal year''.
       (c) Additional Authority for the Activities of the Office 
     of Security Cooperation in Iraq.--Subsection (f) of such 
     section, as so amended, is further amended--
       (1) by striking ``fiscal year 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal 
     year 2014''; and
       (2) by striking ``and Counter Terrorism Service''.

     SEC. 1215. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY 
                   FOR PROGRAM TO DEVELOP AND CARRY OUT 
                   INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFGHANISTAN.

       Section 1217(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended by section 1219 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following 
     new subparagraph:
       ``(C) Up to $279,000,000 made available to the Department 
     of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 
     2014.'';
       (2) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
       (i) by striking ``fiscal year 2011'' and inserting ``fiscal 
     year 2013''; and
       (ii) by inserting ``, or phase of a project,'' after ``each 
     project'';
       (B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); 
     and
       (C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
     subparagraph:
       ``(C) An assessment of the capability of the Afghan 
     National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide security for such 
     project after January 1, 2015, including ANSF force levels 
     required to secure the project. Such assessment should 
     include the estimated costs of providing security and whether 
     or not the Government of Afghanistan is committed to 
     providing such security.''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following 
     new subparagraph:
       ``(D) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2014, until 
     September 30, 2015.''.

     SEC. 1216. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISAS FOR CERTAIN IRAQI AND 
                   AFGHAN ALLIES.

       (a) Protection for Afghan Allies.--Section 602(b) of the 
     Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C.1101 note) is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ``on or after 
     October 7, 2001,'' and inserting ``during the period 
     beginning on October 7, 2001, and ending on December 31, 
     2014,'';
       (2) in paragraph (2)(D), by adding at the end the 
     following: ``A principal alien described in subparagraph (A) 
     seeking special immigrant status under this section shall 
     apply for an approval described in this subparagraph not 
     later than September 30, 2015.''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``2013.'' and 
     inserting ``2013, and may not exceed 435 for each of fiscal 
     years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.''.
       (b) Special Immigrant Status for Certain Iraqis.--Section 
     1244(a)(1) of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 
     U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended by striking the semicolon at the 
     end and inserting ``on or before the date of the enactment of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2014;''.

     SEC. 1217. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT 
                   TO 100 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY 
                   AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH TAXES ARE NOT 
                   REIMBURSED BY AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) Requirement to Withhold Assistance to Afghanistan.--An 
     amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes assessed 
     during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on 
     all Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the 
     Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated 
     for such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that 
     the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to 
     the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
     of Representatives that such taxes have not been reimbursed 
     by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense 
     or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned.
       (b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines 
     that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States 
     goals in Afghanistan.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
     House of Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed 
     during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on 
     all Department of Defense assistance.
       (d) Department of Defense Assistance Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``Department of Defense assistance'' means 
     funds provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the 
     Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees, 
     contractors, or subcontractors.

         Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014

     SEC. 1221. MODIFICATION OF REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD SECURITY 
                   AND STABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) In General.--Section 1230 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 
     122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended by section 1214(a) 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal

[[Page 8955]]

     Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1986), is further 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as 
     subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(f) Matters to Be Included: Redeployment of United States 
     Armed Forces From Afghanistan.--The report required under 
     subsection (a) shall include a detailed description of the 
     following matters relating to the redeployment of United 
     States Armed Forces from Afghanistan:
       ``(1) The number and a description of United States Armed 
     Forces redeployed, vehicles and equipment redeployed, and 
     bases closed during the reporting period.
       ``(2) A summary of tasks and functions conducted by the 
     United States Armed Forces or the Department of Defense that 
     have been transferred to other United States Government 
     departments and agencies, Afghan Government ministries and 
     agencies, other foreign governments, or nongovernmental 
     organizations, or discontinued during the reporting period. 
     The summary shall include a discussion of the formal and 
     informal arrangements and working groups that have been 
     established to coordinate and execute the transfer of such 
     tasks and functions.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made this section apply 
     with respect to any report required to be submitted under 
     section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 385) on or 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1222. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON UNITED STATES MILITARY 
                   SUPPORT IN AFGHANISTAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) since the United States engagement in Afghanistan 
     beginning in 2001, United States and coalition forces have 
     achieved substantial progress toward security and stability 
     in Afghanistan, including the training of the Afghan National 
     Security Forces;
       (2) a stable and secure Afghanistan with a credible 
     government is in the long-term national security interests of 
     the United States and would contribute to the overall 
     stability and security in the region;
       (3) as the United States accelerates transfer of the lead 
     for security to the Afghan National Security Forces by the 
     spring of 2013, the United States should assist the Afghan 
     National Security Forces to maintain gains in security and 
     should continue to evaluate the capability and capacity of 
     the Afghan National Security Forces through the fighting 
     season in 2013;
       (4) following the duration of the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization (NATO) mission on December 31, 2014, the United 
     States should continue efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and 
     defeat al Qaeda;
       (5) the Haqqani Network continues to be the most important 
     enabler of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan;
       (6) the operational requirements of the Afghan National 
     Security Forces, in part due to the threat to the Government 
     of Afghanistan from the Haqqani Network, al Qaeda, and other 
     associated groups, necessitate that the Afghan Security 
     National Forces have sufficient operational capacity to 
     maintain the security of Afghanistan, including enabler 
     capabilities such as aviation, casualty evacuation, 
     logistics, intelligence, and indirect fire;
       (7) the United States, with its Afghan partners, should 
     provide assistance to the Government of Afghanistan so that 
     the Taliban, the Haqqani Network, and associated terrorist 
     and insurgent groups cannot militarily overthrow the 
     Government of Afghanistan or plan and launch attacks against 
     United States and Afghan interests from safe havens in 
     Afghanistan;
       (8) the United States military's transition to 
     counterterrorism and advise and assist missions should occur 
     consistent with agreements between the United States, 
     Afghanistan, and international partners as well as conditions 
     on the ground;
       (9) a bilateral security agreement that preserves vital 
     United States interests between the United States and the 
     Government of Afghanistan, achieved at the earliest 
     practicable time, is critical to the long-term stability of 
     Afghanistan as well as United States' long term interests; 
     however, the United States should not sign a bilateral 
     security agreement that is antithetical to United States 
     national security interests or commits to funding not 
     directly linked to achieving those interests;
       (10) the United States should support the achievement of a 
     bilateral security agreement between NATO and the Government 
     of Afghanistan because such a bilateral security agreement 
     also will contribute to the long term stability and security 
     of Afghanistan;
       (11) the United States should conduct the required 
     oversight and audits of United States stability programs to 
     ensure that the activities are in line with the intended 
     purpose of these programs;
       (12) the United States should assist the Government of 
     Afghanistan to provide security for the Afghan elections 
     scheduled for 2014 and provide such assistance as requested 
     by Afghan Government entities overseeing the elections and 
     judged necessary by the United States to help guarantee a 
     credible and legitimate election; and
       (13) significant uncertainty exists within Afghanistan 
     regarding the level of future United States military support 
     following the end of the NATO mission on December 31, 2014, 
     and therefore in order to reduce such uncertainty and promote 
     further stability and security in Afghanistan following the 
     end of the NATO mission, the President should--
       (A) publicly support a residual United States military 
     presence in Afghanistan consistent with United States 
     national security interests;
       (B) as part of the announcement of residual force levels, 
     publicly define the mission sets and the support that the 
     United States will provide to the Afghan National Security 
     Forces; and
       (C) publicly support sufficient funding for the Afghan 
     National Security Forces until the Government of Afghanistan 
     is able to independently sustain the security of Afghanistan 
     consistent with United States national security interests.

     SEC. 1223. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PLAN.

       (a) Plan Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent 
     Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
     Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the Senate a Department of Defense plan regarding covered 
     defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of 
     the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such plan 
     shall include--
       (1) a description of the covered defense intelligence 
     assets;
       (2) a description of any such assets to remain in 
     Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, to continue to support 
     military operations;
       (3) a description of any such assets that will be or have 
     been reallocated to other locations outside of the United 
     States in support of the Department of Defense;
       (4) the defense intelligence priorities that will be or 
     have been addressed with the reallocation of such assets from 
     Afghanistan;
       (5) the necessary logistics, operations, and maintenance 
     plans to operate in the locations where such assets will be 
     or have been reallocated, including personnel, basing, and 
     any host country agreements; and
       (6) a description of any such assets that will be or have 
     been returned to the United States.
       (b) Covered Defense Intelligence Assets Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``covered defense intelligence assets'' 
     means Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel 
     supporting military operations in Afghanistan at any time 
     during the one-year period ending on the date of the 
     enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 
                   AUTHORITIES FOR AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) Reintegration Activities and Infrastructure Projects in 
     Afghanistan.--
       (1) In general.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended to 
     carry out the provisions of law described in paragraph (2) 
     until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of 
     Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the 
     certification described in subsection (d).
       (2) Provisions of law.--The provisions of law referred to 
     in paragraph (1) are the following:
       (A) Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4392; relating to authority to use funds for 
     reintegration activities in Afghanistan).
       (B) Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4393; relating to authority for program to develop 
     and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan).
       (b) Commanders' Emergency Response Program in 
     Afghanistan.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 
     this Act to carry out section 1201 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1619; relating to the Commanders' Emergency 
     Response Program in Afghanistan), $45,000,000 may not be 
     obligated or expended until 15 days after the date on which 
     the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified 
     congressional committees the certification described in 
     subsection (d).
       (c) Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.--Of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Afghanistan 
     Security Forces Fund, $2,615,000,000 may not be obligated or 
     expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary 
     of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees 
     the certification described in subsection (d).
       (d) Certification Described.--The certification referred to 
     in subsections (a), (b), and (c) is a certification of the 
     Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of 
     State, that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a 
     bilateral security agreement that--
       (1) protects the Department of Defense, its military and 
     civilian personnel, and contractors from liability to pay any 
     tax, or similar charge, associated with efforts to carry out 
     missions in the territory of Afghanistan that have been 
     agreed to by both the Government of the United States and the 
     Government of Afghanistan;
       (2) ensures exclusive jurisdiction for the United States 
     over United States Armed Forces located in Afghanistan;
       (3) ensures that there is no infringement on the right of 
     self-defense of the United States military mission or United 
     States military personnel in Afghanistan;
       (4) ensures that the United States military in Afghanistan 
     is permitted to take the efforts deemed necessary to protect 
     other United States Government offices and personnel in 
     Afghanistan as may be required;
       (5) ensures that the United States military mission in 
     Afghanistan has sufficient access to

[[Page 8956]]

     bases and basing rights as may be necessary to carry out the 
     activities in Afghanistan that the President has assigned to 
     the military; and
       (6) ensures that the United States has the freedom of 
     movement to carry out those military missions as may be 
     required to continue the effort to defeat al Qaeda and its 
     associated forces.
       (e) Specified Congressional Committees.--In this section, 
     the term ``specified congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

                  Subtitle D--Matters Relating to Iran

     SEC. 1231. REPORT ON UNITED STATES MILITARY PARTNERSHIP WITH 
                   GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COUNTRIES.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
     the United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 
     Council countries.
       (b) Matters to Be Included.--The report required by 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) An explanation of the steps that the Department of 
     Defense is taking to improve the interoperability of United 
     States-Gulf Cooperation Council countries missile defense 
     systems.
       (2) An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf 
     Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and 
     restrictions on United States operations.
       (3) An outline of United States efforts in Gulf Cooperation 
     Council countries that are funded by overseas contingency 
     operations funding, an explanation of overseas contingency 
     operations funding for such efforts, and a plan to transition 
     overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts to 
     long-term, sustainable funding sources.
       (c) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
     annex, if necessary.

     SEC. 1232. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 
                   POWER OF IRAN.

       (a) In General.--Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 
     123 Stat. 2542) is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
       ``(E) a description of the strategy and structure of the 
     global Iranian Threat Network and an assessment of the 
     capability of such Network and how such Network operates to 
     reinforce Iran's grand strategy; and
       ``(F) a description of the gaps in intelligence of the 
     Department of Defense with respect to Iran and a 
     prioritization of those gaps in intelligence by operational 
     need.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 
     and shall apply with respect to reports required to be 
     submitted under section 1245 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as so amended, on or 
     after that date.

     SEC. 1233. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE DEFENSE OF THE ARABIAN 
                   GULF.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) In response to U.S. Central Command requirements, the 
     United States Navy has maintained, on average, more than one 
     aircraft carrier in the Arabian Gulf for more than five 
     years.
       (2) In February 2013, the senior leadership of the 
     Department of Defense elected to reduce the number of 
     aircraft carriers deployed to the Arabian Gulf in light of 
     budget constraints and limitation of the overall carrier 
     force structure to support the two aircraft carrier 
     requirement.
       (3) In reference to the decision to indefinitely delay the 
     deployment of the USS Harry Truman, CVN 75, and the USS 
     Gettysburg, its cruiser escort, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, 
     General Martin Dempsey stated, ``We're trying to stretch our 
     readiness out by keeping this particular carrier in homeport 
     in our global response force, so if something happens 
     elsewhere in the world, we can respond to it. Had we deployed 
     it and `consumed' that readiness, we could have created a 
     situation where downstream we wouldn't have a carrier present 
     in certain parts of the world at all.''.
       (4) Highlighting the risks of having only one aircraft 
     carrier in the region and relying on land-based aircraft, 
     General Dempsey stated, ``When you have carrier-based 
     aircraft, you have complete autonomy and control over when 
     you use them. When you use land-based aircraft, you often 
     have to have host-nation permission to use them.''.
       (5) Addressing the perception of the United States 
     commitment to the region, General James Mattis, Commander of 
     U.S. Central Command, testified in March 2013, ``Perhaps the 
     greatest risk to U.S. interests in the region is a perceived 
     lack of an enduring U.S. commitment to collective interests 
     and the security of our regional partners.''. He went on to 
     testify that, ``The drawdown of our forces can be 
     misinterpreted as a lack of attention, a lack of commitment 
     to the region.''.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) maintaining only one aircraft carrier battle group in 
     the Arabian Gulf constrains United States' options and could 
     put at risk the ability to have diversified platforms from 
     which to defend the Arabian Gulf and, if necessary, to 
     conduct military operations to prevent Iran from threatening 
     the United States, United States allies, or Iran's neighbors 
     with nuclear weapons;
       (2) it is in the interests of the United States to maintain 
     both land-based and sea-based capabilities in the region to 
     project force;
       (3) land-based locations in the region could restrict 
     United States military options and critically impact the 
     operational capability if required to conduct a defense of 
     the Arabian Gulf because the United States has not finalized 
     bilateral security agreements with key Gulf Cooperation 
     Council countries;
       (4) as a result of these and other critical limitations 
     associated with maintaining one aircraft carrier battle group 
     in the Arabian Gulf, United States military commanders have 
     expressed concerns about the operational constraints, the 
     increasing uncertainty among United States allies, and the 
     emboldening of potential adversaries such as Iran;
       (5) regarding the ability of the United States Navy to 
     maintain a two aircraft carrier presence in the Arabian Gulf, 
     the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan Greenert, 
     stated, ``We need 11 carriers to do the job. That's been 
     pretty clearly written, and that's underwritten in our 
     defense strategic guidance.''.
       (6) the United States should construct and sufficiently 
     sustain a fleet of at least eleven aircraft carriers and 
     associated battle force ships in order to meet current and 
     future requirements and to support at least a two aircraft 
     carrier battle group presence in the Arabian Gulf, in 
     addition to meeting other operational requirements; and
       (7) the United States should finalize bilateral agreements 
     with key Gulf Cooperation Council countries that support the 
     Defense of the Arabian Gulf requirements, at the earliest 
     possible date.

                 Subtitle E--Reports and Other Matters

     SEC. 1241. REPORT ON POSTURE AND READINESS OF UNITED STATES 
                   ARMED FORCES TO RESPOND TO FUTURE TERRORIST 
                   ATTACKS IN AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 
     11, 2012, may have never occurred or could have been 
     prevented had there been an international stabilizing force 
     following NATO-led operations in order to help stabilize the 
     country, build capacity within the security forces, and 
     pursue terrorist groups that threaten the local government as 
     well as United States interests;
       (2) the attack also highlighted the limitations of the 
     United States military to alert, deploy, and decisively 
     counter a no-notice terrorist attack such as the one in 
     Benghazi, or another security contingency, due to the 
     limitations stemming from United States military posture in 
     Africa and the Middle East and when there is a lack of a 
     layered defense at United States diplomatic facilities;
       (3) the United States military is more effectively able to 
     respond to terrorist attacks on United States facilities 
     outside of the United States if the responding United States 
     military assets are forward deployed;
       (4) when an intelligence threat assessment determines that 
     a United States facility overseas is vulnerable to attack, 
     such facility should have robust force protection measures 
     sufficient to safeguard personnel and assets until a United 
     States military response can arrive;
       (5) the continually evolving terrorist threat to United 
     States interests on the Continent of Africa and the Middle 
     East necessitates that the United States military maintains a 
     forward deployed posture in Europe, Middle East, and Africa 
     in order to be able to respond to terrorist events, or other 
     security contingencies, and to effectively evacuate and 
     recover United States personnel;
       (6) the United States military, in conjunction with the 
     Department of State and the intelligence community, should 
     continue to evaluate the assumptions underpinning the 
     terrorist threat in order to ensure that it is effectively 
     able to respond globally to future terrorist attacks;
       (7) the United States military should regularly re-evaluate 
     the posture and alert status requirements of its crisis 
     response elements in order to be more responsive to the 
     evolving and global nature of the terrorist threat, and all 
     United States military crisis response elements should be 
     fully equipped with the required supporting capabilities to 
     conduct their missions;
       (8) on April 16, 2013, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
     Staff, General Martin Dempsey, testified before the House 
     Appropriations Committee that the military is, ``. . 
     .adapting our force posture to a new normal of combustible 
     violence in North Africa and in the Middle East'';
       (9) The President stated in a press conference on May 16, 
     2013, ``I have directed the Defense Department to ensure that 
     our military can respond lightening quick in times of 
     crisis.'';
       (10) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs should continue to 
     evaluate the posture of United States forces to respond to 
     the global terrorist threat, including an evaluation of 
     whether United States Africa Command should have forces and 
     necessary equipment permanently assigned to the command to 
     respond more promptly to this ``new normal''; and
       (11) although the Department of State-initiated 
     Accountability Review Board found that the Marine Security 
     Guard program should be expanded and that there should be 
     greater coordination between the Department of Defense and 
     the Department of State to identify additional resources for 
     security at high risk posts,

[[Page 8957]]

     the United States military may be challenged to provide 
     additional security to Department of State facilities due to 
     budget shortfalls, on-going force structure constraints, and 
     increasing operational requirements for the Department of 
     Defense.
       (b) Report Required.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 
     shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
     report on the posture and readiness of United States Armed 
     Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and 
     the Middle East.
       (2) Matters to be included.--The plan required under 
     paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
       (A) An assessment of terrorist groups and other non-state 
     groups that threaten United States interests and facilities 
     in Africa, including a description of the key assumptions 
     underpinning such assessment.
       (B) A description of the readiness, posture, and alert 
     status of relevant United States Armed Forces in Europe, the 
     Middle East, Africa, and the United States and any changes 
     implemented or planned to be implemented since the terrorist 
     attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, to respond 
     to the ``new normal'' and President Obama's directive for the 
     military to respond ``lightening quick'' in times of crisis.
       (C) In consultation with the Secretary of State, a 
     description of new or modified requirements of the Department 
     of State, if any, for--
       (i) United States Marine Security Guard Detachments;
       (ii) any other Department of Defense assets to provide 
     enhanced security at Department of State facilities;
       (iii) an explanation of how any new requirements for Marine 
     Security Detachments or other Department of Defense assets 
     affect the capacity of the Armed Forces, including 
     specifically the capacity of the Marine Corps, to fulfill 
     Department of Defense operational requirements; and
       (iv) an explanation of how any unfulfilled requirements for 
     Marine Security Detachments would adversely impact security 
     at Department of State facilities.
       (3) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate 
     congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
       (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

     SEC. 1242. ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF EGYPT TO UNITED STATES 
                   NATIONAL SECURITY.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) Egypt is undergoing a significant political transition 
     and the ultimate outcome of this political process and its 
     implications for United States national security interests 
     remain uncertain;
       (2) the United States continues to have considerable 
     concerns about the intentions and actions of the Egyptian 
     Muslim Brotherhood and whether the government of President 
     Morsi is committed to a pluralistic, democratic Egypt;
       (3) the United States has a stake in Egypt becoming a 
     mature, pluralistic democracy in which the rights of Egyptian 
     citizens, including women and minorities, are protected;
       (4) the United States should continue to closely monitor 
     President Morsi's support for the peace treaty with the 
     Government of Israel, which has been a stabilizing force in 
     the region for over 30 years;
       (5) the United States military relationship with the 
     Egyptian military is long-standing and should remain a key 
     pillar to, and component of, United States engagement with 
     Egypt;
       (6) the close military-to-military relationship between the 
     United States and Egypt has been a critical component in 
     enabling counterterrorism cooperation between the two 
     governments to ensure the United States military has freedom 
     of movement throughout the region in order to deter 
     aggression and respond to threats to United States national 
     security interests, particularly in light of the security 
     situation in Libya and the Sinai;
       (7) the Egyptian military has exercised restraint and 
     professionalism during the unrest in Egypt over the last two 
     years and hopefully will remain a key mechanism through which 
     the United States can support the people of Egypt in 
     achieving their goals for a representative and democratic 
     political system, while promoting peace and security in the 
     region; and
       (8) therefore, with appropriate vetting, United States 
     military assistance and support to the Egyptian military 
     should continue, even as civilian aid to Egypt receives 
     greater scrutiny as a result of the uncertainty associated 
     with Egypt's current political leadership and economic 
     policies.
       (b) Plan Required.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a 
     comprehensive plan for United States military assistance and 
     cooperation with Egypt.
       (2) Matters to be included.--The plan required under 
     paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, a detailed 
     description of the following:
       (A) How United States security assistance and cooperation 
     enables--
       (i) freedom of movement for the United States military 
     throughout the region; and
       (ii) the Government of Egypt to disrupt, dismantle, and 
     defeat al Qaeda, affiliated groups, and other terrorist 
     organizations, whether based in and operating from Egyptian 
     territory or the region.
       (B) The capacity of the Government of Egypt to prevent the 
     illicit movement of terrorists, criminals, weapons, and other 
     dangerous material across Egypt's borders or administrative 
     boundaries, including through tunnels and other illicit 
     points of entry into Gaza.
       (C) The extent to which the Egyptian military is--
       (i) supporting the protection of the political, economic, 
     and religious freedoms and human rights of all citizens and 
     residents in Egypt;
       (ii) supporting credible and legitimate elections in Egypt;
       (iii) supporting the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty;
       (iv) taking effective steps to eliminate smuggling networks 
     and to detect and destroy tunnels between Egypt and Gaza; and
       (v) supporting action to combat terrorism in the Sinai.
       (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this 
     subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (A) the congressional defense committees; and
       (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1243. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE MILITARY DEVELOPMENTS ON 
                   THE KOREAN PENINSULA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (``North 
     Korea'') has escalated regional tensions with hostile 
     rhetoric and provocative actions.
       (2) North Korea threatened a nuclear attack on the United 
     States and a resumption of open war against the Republic of 
     Korea (``South Korea'').
       (3) North Korea's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile 
     programs constitute a threat to the national security of the 
     United States and to regional stability.
       (4) On April 14, 2009, North Korea halted negotiations 
     regarding its nuclear weapons program when it abandoned the 
     Six-Party Talks with the People's Republic of China 
     (``China''), Japan, the Russian Federation (``Russia''), 
     South Korea, and the United States.
       (5) On May 25, 2009, North Korea detonated a nuclear device 
     in an underground explosive test.
       (6) On March 26, 2010, North Korea sank a South Korean 
     naval vessel, the Cheonan, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
       (7) On November 23, 2010, North Korea shelled the border 
     island of Yeonpyeong-do, killing four people. This was the 
     first direct artillery attack on South Korean territory since 
     the signing of the 1953 armistice.
       (8) On April 13, 2012, North Korea conducted a rocket 
     launch that failed to send a satellite into orbit. This 
     launch violated United Nations Security Council (UNSC) 
     Resolutions 1718 and 1874.
       (9) On December 12, 2012, North Korea used banned long-
     range missile technology to launch an earth observation 
     satellite into orbit. In response, the UNSC unanimously 
     adopted Resolution 2087, condemning the launch.
       (10) On February 12, 2013, North Korea conducted a third 
     underground nuclear test in violation of UNSC Resolution 
     1718, 1874, and 2087. The test also contravened North Korea's 
     commitments under the September 2005 Joint Statement of the 
     Six-Party Talks.
       (11) On March 7, 2013, the UNSC unanimously adopted 
     Resolution 2094, condemning North Korea's third nuclear test 
     and imposed additional sanctions against the regime.
       (12) On March 28, 2013, North Korea unilaterally nullified 
     the armistice agreement with the United States that suspended 
     military conflict on the Korean peninsula.
       (13) On March 30, 2013, North Korea declared a state of war 
     with South Korea.
       (14) On April 4, 2013, North Korea placed two intermediate-
     range Musudan missiles on mobile launchers and temporarily 
     relocated them to the eastern coast of the Korean peninsula 
     before removing them a month later from the launch sites.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States and its allies, South Korea and 
     Japan, share the goal of a stable and peaceful Korean 
     Peninsula, free of nuclear weapons;
       (2) the United States remains committed to defending its 
     allies in the Asia-Pacific region and stability in Northeast 
     Asia requires restraint by all parties from activities that 
     would complicate international relations or escalate 
     international tensions, and international disputes should be 
     mitigated in a constructive manner consistent with 
     established principles of international law;
       (3) Congress supports--
       (A) the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula 
     in a peaceful manner,
       (B) North Korea's abandonment of its nuclear programs and 
     return to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear 
     Weapons and to International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards; 
     and
       (C) North Korea's full acceptance of and compliance with 
     the terms of the 1953 Armistice Agreement;
       (4) the United States has national interests in security 
     and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, the implementation 
     of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, nuclear non-
     proliferation efforts, the promotion of respect for the 
     fundamental human rights of the North Korean people, 
     international cyber-security cooperation, and full 
     implementation of United States and multilateral sanctions 
     against illicit activities;

[[Page 8958]]

       (5) the United States encourages China and Russia to fully 
     implement and enforce United States and United Nations 
     Security Council sanctions against North Korea; and
       (6) the President, the Secretary of State, and the 
     Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully informed on 
     security developments on the Korean Peninsula.

     SEC. 1244. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH 
                   GEORGIA.

       It is the sense of Congress that the United States should 
     enhance its defense cooperation efforts with Georgia and 
     support the efforts of the Government of Georgia to provide 
     for the defense of its government, people, and sovereign 
     territory.

     SEC. 1245. LIMITATION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL SPECIAL 
                   OPERATIONS FORCES COORDINATION CENTERS.

       (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be 
     obligated or expended to plan, prepare, establish, or 
     implement any ``Regional Special Operations Forces 
     Coordination Center'' (RSCC) or similar regional coordination 
     entities.
       (b) Exclusion.--The limitation contained in subsection (a) 
     shall not apply with respect to any RSCC or similar regional 
     coordination entity authorized by statute, including the 
     North Atlantic Treaty Organization Special Operations 
     Headquarters authorized under section 1244 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
     111-84; 123 Stat. 2541).
       (c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the 
     congressional committees specified in subsection (d) a report 
     on the following:
       (1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose of the 
     RSCC concept.
       (2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the 
     establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each 
     geographic combatant command, to include how such centers 
     have been coordinated and de-conflicted with existing 
     regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches.
       (3) An explanation of why existing regional centers and 
     multilateral frameworks cannot satisfy the requirements and 
     needs of the Department of Defense and geographic combatant 
     commands.
       (4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Program 
     for such centers, to include estimates of contributions of 
     nations participating in such centers.
       (5) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or 
     Secretary of State determines appropriate.
       (d) Specified Congressional Committees.--The congressional 
     committees referred to in subsection (c) are--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.

     SEC. 1246. ADDITIONAL REPORTS ON MILITARY AND SECURITY 
                   DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S 
                   REPUBLIC OF KOREA.

       (a) Report.--Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
     (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by 
     striking ``November 1, 2012, and November 1, 2013,'' and 
     inserting ``November 1, 2013, November 1, 2015, and November 
     1, 2017,''.
       (b) Update.--Section 1236 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(c) Update.--The Secretary of Defense shall revise or 
     supplement the most recent report submitted pursuant to 
     subsection (a) if, in the Secretary's estimation, interim 
     events or developments occurring in a period between reports 
     required under subsection (a) warrant revision or 
     supplement.''.

     SEC. 1247. AMENDMENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT UNDER ARMS CONTROL AND 
                   DISARMAMENT ACT.

       (a) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--Section 403 of 
     the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the Speaker of the 
     House of Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee 
     on Foreign Relations of the Senate'' and inserting ``the 
     appropriate congressional committees''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In 
     this section, the term `appropriate congressional committees' 
     means--
       ``(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on 
     Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
     the Senate; and
       ``(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 
     Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the House of Representatives.''.
       (b) Congressional Briefing.--Section 403 of the Arms 
     Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by 
     subsection (a) of this section, is further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(e) Congressional Briefing.--Not later than May 15 of 
     each year, the President shall provide to such committees a 
     briefing on such report.''.

     SEC. 1248. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO PROVIDE THE RUSSIAN 
                   FEDERATION WITH ACCESS TO CERTAIN MISSILE 
                   DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
     otherwise made available for each of the fiscal years 2014 
     through 2018 for the Department of Defense may be used to 
     provide the Russian Federation with access to information 
     regarding--
       (1) missile defense technology of the United States 
     relating to hit-to-kill technology; or
       (2) telemetry data with respect to missile defense 
     interceptors or target vehicles.

     SEC. 1249. REPORTS ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE SUPPORT OF BALLISTIC 
                   MISSILE PROGRAMS OF CHINA, SYRIA, IRAN, AND 
                   NORTH KOREA.

       (a) Disclosure of and Report on Russian Support of 
     Ballistic Missile Programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North 
     Korea.--
       (1) In general.--The President shall seek to encourage the 
     Government of the Russian Federation to disclose any support 
     by the Russian Federation or Russian entities for the 
     ballistic missile programs of the People's Republic of China, 
     Syria, Iran, or North Korea.
       (2) Report required.--The President shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a semi-annual report on any 
     disclosure by the Government of the Russian Federation of any 
     such support during the preceding six-month period.
       (3) Initial report.--The initial report required by 
     paragraph (2) shall be submitted not later than 180 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act and in addition 
     to addressing any such support during the preceding six-month 
     period shall also address any such support during the 10-year 
     period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (b) Cooperation of Russia and China to Reduce Technology 
     and Expertise That Supports the Ballistic Missile Programs of 
     Syria, Iran, North Korea, and Other Countries.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of State, in coordination 
     with the Secretary of Defense, shall develop a plan to seek 
     and secure the cooperation of the Russian Federation and the 
     People's Republic of China to verifiably reduce the spread of 
     technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile 
     programs of the Syria, Iran, North Korea, or any other 
     country that the Secretary of State determines has a 
     ballistic missile program.
       (2) Report and briefings required.--The Secretary of State, 
     in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees not later than 180 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act a report 
     describing the plan required in paragraph (1) and provide 
     briefings to such committees annually thereafter until 2018 
     on the progress and results of these efforts.
       (3) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate 
     congressional committees'' means--
       (A) the congressional defense committees;
       (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
     House of Representatives and the Select Committee on 
     Intelligence of the Senate; and
       (C) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
     Senate.
       (c) Form.--Each report required by this section shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
     annex, if necessary.

     SEC. 1250. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATIONS RELATING TO STATUS OF 
                   FORCES AGREEMENTS.

       (a) In General.--With respect to an agreement on the status 
     of forces between the United States and a foreign country, 
     the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 
     of State, shall notify the appropriate congressional 
     committees not later than 15 days after the date on which the 
     agreement is signed, renewed, amended or otherwise revised, 
     or terminated.
       (b) Briefings Required.--Not later than February 1 of each 
     calendar year, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 
     the Secretary of State, shall provide a briefing to the 
     appropriate congressional committees on the following:
       (1) Status of forces agreements that the United States will 
     seek to enter into in such calendar year.
       (2) Status of forces agreements that have expired and which 
     the United States will seek to renew in such calendar year.
       (3) Amendments to status of forces agreements that the 
     Secretary of Defense determines to be substantial and are 
     likely to be negotiated in such calendar year.
       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section, 
     the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the congressional defense committees; and
       (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (d) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the 
     date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with 
     respect to an agreement described in subsection (a) that is 
     signed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 1251. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE CONFLICT IN SYRIA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:

[[Page 8959]]

       (1) The conflict in Syria began in March 2011.
       (2) As of February 2013, the United Nations High 
     Commissioner for Human Rights estimated that approximately 
     70,000 Syrians have been killed during the conflict.
       (3) According to the United Nations High Commissioner for 
     Refugees, over 1,200,000 Syrians are registered refugees or 
     persons of concern including, over 66,000 in Egypt, over 
     145,000 in Iraq, over 461,000 in Jordan, over 462,000 in 
     Lebanon, and over 329,000 in Turkey.
       (4) Jabhat al-Nusra, a group located in Syria and 
     categorized as an affiliate of al-Qaeda by the intelligence 
     community, presents a direct threat to the interests of the 
     United States and could present a direct threat to the United 
     States.
       (5) On August 19, 2011, President Obama stated: ``The 
     future of Syria must be determined by its people, but 
     President Bashar al-Assad is standing in their way. We have 
     consistently said that President Assad must lead a democratic 
     transition or get out of the way. He has not led. For the 
     sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President 
     Assad to step aside.''.
       (6) The United States is deploying 200 military personnel 
     from the headquarters of the 1st Armored Division to Jordan 
     in order to ``improve readiness and prepare for a number of 
     scenarios''.
       (7) In a letter from Miguel Rodriguez, the Assistant to the 
     President for Legislative Affairs, to Senators McCain and 
     Levin, dated April 25, 2013, it stated that ``our 
     intelligence community does assess with varying degrees of 
     confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons 
     on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent 
     sarin. . .We do believe that any use of chemical weapons in 
     Syria would very likely have originated with the Assad 
     regime. . .the President has made it clear that the use of 
     chemical weapons--or the transfer of chemical weapons to 
     terrorist groups--is a red line for the United States of 
     America''.
       (8) In a press conference with Israel Prime Minister, 
     Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama stated: ``I have made 
     clear that the use of chemical weapons is a game-changer''.
       (9) In August 2012, during a White House press conference, 
     President Obama stated: ``We have been very clear to the 
     Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a 
     redline for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical 
     weapons moving around or being utilized.''.
       (10) It is a threat to the vital national security interest 
     of the United States if terrorist groups, such as al-Qaeda, 
     obtain chemical or biological material or weapons in Syria.
       (11) At a Pentagon press conference on May 2, 2013, 
     Secretary Hagel confirmed that the Obama Administration is 
     re-thinking its opposition to arming the rebels.
       (12) On April 11, 2013, responding to a question about the 
     need for a supplemental funding request for any potential 
     United States military effort in Syria, Secretary Hagel 
     stated: ``Yes, I think it is pretty clear that a supplemental 
     would be required.''.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) President Obama should have a comprehensive policy and 
     should ensure robust contingency planning to secure United 
     States' interests in Syria;
       (2) President Obama should fully consider all courses of 
     action to remove President Bashar al-Assad from power;
       (3) the conflict in Syria threatens the vital national 
     security interests of Israel, which should be sufficiently 
     weighed by the President when considering policy approaches 
     towards the conflict in Syria;
       (4) the President should fully consider all courses of 
     action to reinforce his stated ``redline'' regarding the use 
     of weapons of mass destruction by the Assad regime in Syria, 
     which could threaten the credibility of the United States 
     with its allies in the region and embolden the Assad regime;
       (5) the United States should continue to conduct rigorous 
     planning and operational preparation to support any efforts 
     to secure the chemical and biological stockpiles and 
     associated weapons;
       (6) the United States should have a policy that supports 
     the stability of countries on Syria's border, including 
     Jordan, Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, and Israel;
       (7) the United States should continue to support Syrian 
     opposition forces with non-lethal aid;
       (8) the President, the Department of Defense, the 
     Department of State, and the intelligence community, in 
     cooperation with European and regional allies, should ensure 
     that the risks of all courses of action or inaction regarding 
     Syria are fully explored and understood and that Congress is 
     kept fully informed of such risks;
       (9) the President should fully consider, and the Department 
     of Defense should conduct prudent planning for, the provision 
     of lethal aid and relevant operational training to vetted 
     Syrian opposition forces, including an analysis of the risks 
     of the provision of such aid and training; and
       (10) should the President decide to employ any military 
     assets in Syria, the President should provide a supplemental 
     budget request to Congress.

     SEC. 1252. REVISION OF STATUTORY REFERENCES TO FORMER NATO 
                   SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATED NATO 
                   AGREEMENTS.

       (a) Title 10, United States Code.--Section 2350d of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``NATO Maintenance and Supply 
     Organization'' each place it appears and inserting ``NATO 
     Support Organization and its executive agencies'';
       (2) in subsection (a)(1)--
       (A) by striking ``Weapon System Partnership Agreements'' 
     and inserting ``Support Partnership Agreements''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``a specific weapon 
     system'' and inserting ``activities''; and
       (3) in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by striking 
     ``Weapon System Partnership Agreement'' each place it appears 
     and inserting ``Support Partnership Agreement''.
       (b) Arms Export Control Act.--Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms 
     Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended--
       (1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking 
     ``Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization'' and inserting ``North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its executive 
     agencies'';
       (2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``weapon system 
     partnership agreement'' and inserting ``support partnership 
     agreement''; and
       (3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking ``a specific 
     weapon system'' and inserting ``activities''.

     SEC. 1253. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT EXECUTIVE 
                   AGREEMENTS RELATING TO UNITED STATES MISSILE 
                   DEFENSE CAPABILITIES.

       (a) Statement of Policy.--Congress reaffirms, with respect 
     to executive agreements relating to the missile defense 
     capabilities of the United States, including basing, 
     locations, capabilities and numbers of missiles with respect 
     to such missile defense capabilities, that section 303(b) of 
     the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2573(b)) 
     provides the following: ``No action shall be taken pursuant 
     to this or any other Act that would obligate the United 
     States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of 
     the United States in a militarily significant manner, except 
     pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set 
     forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution 
     or unless authorized by the enactment of further affirmative 
     legislation by the Congress of the United States.''.
       (b) Limitation on Funds.--None of the funds authorized to 
     be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 
     2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of 
     Defense may be used--
       (1) to implement any executive agreement relating to the 
     missile defense capabilities of the United States, including 
     basing, locations, capabilities, and numbers of missiles with 
     respect to such missile defense capabilities; or
       (2) to implement rules of engagement or Guidance for 
     Employment of Force relating to such executive agreement.
       (c) Rule of Construction.--Subsection (b) shall not apply 
     with respect to the use of funds to negotiate or implement 
     any executive agreement with a country with respect to which 
     the United States has entered into a treaty of alliance or 
     has a security guarantee.
       (d) Executive Agreement Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``executive agreement'' means an international agreement 
     other than--
       (1) an agreement that is in the form of a treaty under 
     article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the 
     United States; or
       (2) an agreement that requires implementing legislation to 
     be enacted into law for the agreement to enter into force 
     with respect to the United States.

     SEC. 1254. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THREAT 
                   REDUCTION ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND UNITED 
                   STATES CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE 
                   NUCLEAR-TEST-BAN TREATY ORGANIZATION.

       (a) In General.--None of the funds made available for 
     fiscal year 2014 for Threat Reduction Engagement activities 
     may be obligated or expended for such purposes until the 
     President certifies to Congress that no state party to the 
     Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty has undertaken nuclear 
     weapons test activities in fiscal year 2013 that are 
     inconsistent with United States interpretations regarding 
     obligations under such Treaty.
       (b) Lobbying or Advocacy Activities.--None of the funds 
     made available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions of the 
     United States to the CTBTO entities may be used for lobbying 
     or advocacy in the United States relating to the 
     Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
       (c) CTBTO Entities.--In subsection (b), the term ``CTBTO 
     entities'' means--
       (1) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization 
     International Monitoring System; and
       (2) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization 
     Preparatory Commission-Special Contributions.

     SEC. 1255. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MILITARY-TO-MILITARY 
                   COOPERATION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND 
                   BURMA.

       It is the sense of the Congress that--
       (1) as the United States policy rebalances towards Asia, it 
     is critical that the United States military comprehensively 
     evaluate its engagement with Burma;
       (2) the future of the military-to-military relationship 
     between the United States and Burma should take into account 
     the current ethnic conflict in Burma and persecution of 
     ethnic and religious minorities;
       (3) while the United States has national security interests 
     in Burma's peace and stability, the

[[Page 8960]]

     peaceful settlement of armed conflicts with the ethnic 
     minority groups requires the Burmese military to respect 
     ceasefire agreements, laws of war, and human rights 
     provisions; and
       (4) the Department of Defense should fully consider and 
     assess the Burmese military's efforts to implement reforms, 
     end impunity for human rights abuses, and increase 
     transparency and accountability before expanding military-to-
     military cooperation beyond initial dialogue and isolated 
     engagements.

     SEC. 1256. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE STATIONING OF UNITED 
                   STATES FORCES IN EUROPE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) During the past several years, over 700 kinetic terror 
     incidents have occurred in the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) 
     area of operations. Rising tensions in the region due to 
     unemployment, fiscal insolvency, ethnic strife, hegemonic 
     desires, and terrorism, pose risks to the security and 
     stability of Europe.
       (2) Arab Spring uprisings in Middle Eastern and North 
     African countries, including the Republic of Mali, the Arab 
     Republic of Egypt, Libya, and the Syrian Arab Republic 
     (Syria), have presented emerging strategic challenges that 
     present significant implications for regional stability, the 
     security of the State of Israel (Israel), and the national 
     security interests of the United States and many European 
     allies.
       (3) U.S. Africa Command does not have formally assigned 
     Army or Marine Corps units assigned to it and it continues to 
     share Air Force and Navy component commands with EUCOM. 
     Consequently, United States forces stationed in Europe have 
     been deployed to support contingencies associated with the 
     Arab Spring in North Africa.
       (4) The Commander of U.S. European Command is responsible 
     for developing operational plans for the defense of Israel. 
     Moreover, forces stationed in Europe would be deployed to 
     defend Israel in the event of such a contingency.
       (5) Regimes, including the Islamic Republic of Iran and 
     Syria, continue efforts to procure, develop, and proliferate 
     advanced ballistic missile technologies that pose a serious 
     threat to United States forces and installations in the 
     theater, as well as to the territory, populations, and forces 
     of Israel and European allies. United States missile defense 
     capabilities in Europe seek to mitigate these threats.
       (6) Violent extremist organizations, including Kongra-Gel, 
     al Qaida, Lebanese Hizballah, and Iranian Qods Force, may 
     utilize Europe as an important venue for recruitment, 
     logistical support, financing, and the targeting of the 
     United States and Western interests.
       (7) Congress has lacked sufficient data to compare the 
     strategic benefits and the costs associated with permanently 
     stationing forces in Europe. The Government Accountability 
     Office (GAO) has found that the combatant commands do not 
     completely and consistently report cost data in their theater 
     posture plans. In particular, GAO reported in February 2011 
     that EUCOM lacks comprehensive cost data in its theater 
     posture plans and therefore decision makers lack critical 
     information that could be used to make fully informed posture 
     decisions. Additionally, in June 2012, GAO found that the 
     Department of Defense has taken steps to align posture 
     initiatives with strategy and cost, but continues to lack 
     comprehensive and consistent cost estimates of initiatives.
       (8) The Department of Defense has reported that the cost of 
     permanently stationing forces in the United States rather 
     than overseas is often offset by such factors as increased 
     rotational costs.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) an enduring United States presence and engagement 
     across Europe and Eurasia provides the critical access and 
     infrastructure necessary to accomplish United States 
     strategic priorities, expand United States global reach to 
     Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East, Africa, as well as the 
     Mediterranean and Atlantic Oceans, and facilitates a rapid 
     United States response for complex contingencies;
       (2) the United States continues to have an interest in 
     supporting the stability and security of Europe, especially 
     in a dynamic and challenging global security environment;
       (3) forward-stationed active duty service members, forward-
     deployed rotational units, and reserve forces assigned to 
     U.S. European Command remain essential for United States 
     planning, logistics, and operations in support of U.S. 
     Central Command, U.S. Africa Command, U.S. Transportation 
     Command, U.S. Special Operations Command, and U.S. Strategic 
     Command, as well as fulfilling commitments under Article V of 
     the North Atlantic Charter;
       (4) in light of the benefits associated with defense of the 
     homeland forward and strategic access, as well as the 
     potential for rotational deployments to increase cost to the 
     Department of Defense, the Department of Defense should 
     implement the recommendations of the Government 
     Accountability Office with regard to improved cost estimation 
     to enable informed force posture decisions prior to making 
     any further significant changes to the United States force 
     posture in Europe that could increase risk for the United 
     States; and
       (5) the Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully and 
     currently informed regarding the requirements of the United 
     States force posture in Europe and the costs associated with 
     maintaining such force.

     SEC. 1257. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MILITARY CAPABILITIES OF THE 
                   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

       Congress--
       (1) notes the People's Republic of China (PRC) continues to 
     rapidly modernize and expand its military capabilities across 
     the land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace domains;
       (2) is concerned by the rate and scope of PRC military 
     developments, including its military-focused cyber espionage, 
     which indicate a desire to constrain or prevent the peaceful 
     activities of the United States and its allies in the Western 
     Pacific;
       (3) concurs with Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S. 
     Pacific Command, that ``China's rapid development of advanced 
     military capabilities, combined with its unclear intentions, 
     certainly raises strategic and security concerns for the U.S 
     and the region'';
       (4) notes the United States remains committed to a robust 
     forward military-presence in the Asia-Pacific and will 
     continue to vigorously support mutual defense arrangements 
     with treaty allies while also building deeper relationships 
     with other strategic partners in the region; and
       (5) urges the Government of the PRC to work peacefully to 
     resolve existing territorial disputes and to adopt a maritime 
     code of conduct with relevant parties to guide all forms of 
     maritime interaction and communications in the Asia-Pacific.

     SEC. 1258. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

       Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the 
     use of force against Syria.

                TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

     SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 
                   PROGRAMS AND FUNDS.

       (a) Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction 
     Programs.--For purposes of section 301 and other provisions 
     of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the 
     programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
       (b) Fiscal Year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds 
     Defined.--As used in this title, the term ``fiscal year 2014 
     Cooperative Threat Reduction funds'' means the funds 
     appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
     in section 301 and made available by the funding table in 
     section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
       (c) Availability of Funds.--Funds appropriated pursuant to 
     the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made 
     available by the funding table in section 4301 for 
     Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for 
     obligation for fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016.

     SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.

       (a) Funding for Specific Purposes.--Of the $528,455,000 
     authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense 
     for fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the 
     funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat 
     Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated 
     for the purposes specified:
       (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $5,655,000.
       (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000.
       (3) For global nuclear security, $32,793,000.
       (4) For cooperative biological engagement, $293,142,110.
       (5) For proliferation prevention, $149,314,890.
       (6) For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000.
       (7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/
     Administrative Costs, $28,175,000.
       (b) Report on Obligation or Expenditure of Funds for Other 
     Purposes.--No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction 
     funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a 
     purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 
     (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of 
     Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which 
     the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of 
     funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding 
     sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or 
     expenditure of fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction 
     funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure 
     of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or 
     any other provision of law.
       (c) Limited Authority to Vary Individual Amounts.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in 
     which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is 
     necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary 
     may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a 
     purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 
     (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that 
     purpose.
       (2) Notice-and-wait required.--An obligation of funds for a 
     purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 
     (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such 
     purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph 
     (1) only after--
       (A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the 
     intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the 
     justification for doing so; and
       (B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the 
     notification.

     SEC. 1303. EXTENSION FOR USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE 
                   COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM.

       Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note) 
     is amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2018''.

[[Page 8961]]



                    TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

                     Subtitle A--Military Programs

     SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     fiscal year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 
                   DEFENSE.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense 
     for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided 
     for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, 
     as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
       (b) Use.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated under 
     subsection (a) are authorized for--
       (1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
     in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 
     Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
       (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 
     United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such 
     Act.

     SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
                   DEFENSE-WIDE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-
     Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding 
     table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector 
     General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4501.

     SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces 
     and other activities and agencies of the Department of 
     Defense in providing for the health of eligible 
     beneficiaries.

                 Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

     SEC. 1411. USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE FOR THE 
                   CONSERVATION OF A STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL 
                   MATERIALS SUPPLY.

       (a) Presidential Responsibility for Conservation of 
     Stockpile Materials.--Section 98e(a) of title 50, United 
     States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs 
     (6) and (7), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 
     paragraph (5):
       ``(5) provide for the recovery of any strategic and 
     critical material from excess materials made available for 
     recovery purposes by other Federal agencies;''.
       (b) Uses of National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund.--
     Section 98h(b)(2) of title 50, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as 
     subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 
     subparagraph (D):
       ``(D) Encouraging the conservation of strategic and 
     critical materials.''.
       (c) Development of Domestic Sources.--Section 98h-6(a) of 
     title 50, United States Code, is amended, in the matter 
     preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ``and conservation'' 
     after ``development''.

     SEC. 1412. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE 
                   NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE.

       (a) Acquisition Authority.--Using funds available in the 
     National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National 
     Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials 
     determined to be strategic and critical materials required to 
     meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of 
     the United States:
       (1) Ferroniobium.
       (2) Dysprosium Metal.
       (3) Yttrium Oxide.
       (4) Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials.
       (5) Lithium Ion Precursors.
       (6) Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High Explosive 
     Molding Powders.
       (b) Amount of Authority.--The National Defense Stockpile 
     Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile 
     Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified 
     in subsection (a).
       (c) Fiscal Year Limitation.--The authority under this 
     section is available for purchases during fiscal year 2014 
     through fiscal year 2019.

                       Subtitle C--Other Matters

     SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
                   AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR 
                   CAPTAIN JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, 
                   ILLINOIS.

       (a) Authority for Transfer of Funds.--Of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated for section 507 and available 
     for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, 
     $143,087,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense 
     to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans 
     Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by 
     subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 
     123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such 
     section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as 
     amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the 
     purpose of such a transfer.
       (b) Use of Transferred Funds.--For the purposes of 
     subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for 
     which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are 
     operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care 
     Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs 
     Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and 
     supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal 
     medical facility under an operational agreement covered by 
     section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 
     122 Stat. 4500).

     SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 
                   RETIREMENT HOME.

       There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund 
     the sum of $67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces 
     Retirement Home.

     SEC. 1423. CEMETERIAL EXPENSES.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, in the amount of 
     $45,800,000.

   TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS 
                         CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

         Subtitle A--Authorization of Additional Appropriations

     SEC. 1501. PURPOSE.

       The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations 
     for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide 
     additional funds for overseas contingency operations being 
     carried out by the Armed Forces.

     SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and 
     the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, 
     as specified in the funding table in section 4102.

     SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for 
     research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in 
     the funding table in section 4202.

     SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and 
     maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 
     4302.

     SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, 
     as specified in the funding table in section 4402.

     SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other 
     activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for 
     providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4502.

     SEC. 1507. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
                   DEFENSE-WIDE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-
     Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding 
     table in section 4502.

     SEC. 1508. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector 
     General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4502.

     SEC. 1509. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not 
     otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4502.

                     Subtitle B--Financial Matters

     SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS.

       The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 
     in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act.

     SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

       (a) Authority To Transfer Authorizations.--
       (1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of 
     Defense that such action is necessary in the national 
     interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of 
     authorizations made

[[Page 8962]]

     available to the Department of Defense in this title for 
     fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that 
     fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of 
     authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be 
     available for the same purposes as the authorization to which 
     transferred.
       (2) Limitation.--The total amount of authorizations that 
     the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this 
     subsection may not exceed $3,000,000,000.
       (b) Terms and Conditions.--Transfers under this section 
     shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as 
     transfers under section 1001.
       (c) Additional Authority.--The transfer authority provided 
     by this section is in addition to the transfer authority 
     provided under section 1001.

               Subtitle C--Limitations and Other Matters

     SEC. 1531. AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND.

       (a) Continuation of Existing Limitations on Use of Funds in 
     Fund.--Funds available to the Department of Defense for the 
     Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall 
     be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) 
     through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 
     122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike 
     Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4424).
       (b) Revision of Plan for Use of Afghanistan Security Forces 
     Fund.--
       (1) Revision and purpose.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use of the Afghanistan 
     Security Forces Fund through September 30, 2017, to ensure 
     that an office or official of the Department of Defense is 
     identified as responsible for each program or activity 
     supported using funds available to the Department of Defense 
     through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
       (2) Submission.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional committees the plan as revised 
     pursuant to paragraph (1).
       (c) Promotion of Recruitment and Retention of Women.--Of 
     the funds available to the Department of Defense for the 
     Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014, no 
     less than $47,300,000 shall be used for the recruitment and 
     retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security 
     Forces. This requirement does not modify the distribution of 
     funds for programs and activities supported using the 
     Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, but will ensure attention 
     to recruitment and retention of women within each program and 
     activity.

     SEC. 1532. FUTURE ROLE OF JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE 
                   DEFEAT ORGANIZATION.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
     the future plans of the Department of Defense for the Joint 
     Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO).
       (b) Required Elements.--The report required by subsection 
     (a) shall include the following elements:
       (1) An analysis of alternatives considered in determining 
     the future plans for JIEDDO.
       (2) If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue 
     JIEDDO--
       (A) a description of how JIEDDO's major programs and 
     capabilities will be integrated into other components within 
     the Department of Defense or discontinued; and
       (B) a statement of the estimated costs to other components 
     of the Department for any JIEDDO programs and capabilities 
     that are reassigned to such components.
       (3) If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue JIEDDO--
       (A) a statement of the expected mission of JIEDDO;
       (B) a description of the expected organizational structure 
     for JIEDDO, including the reporting structure and lines of 
     authority within the Department and personnel strength, 
     including contractors; and
       (C) a statement of the estimated costs and budgetary 
     impacts related to implementing any changes to the mission of 
     JIEDDO and its organizational structure.
       (4) A timeline for implementation of the selected 
     alternative described in paragraph (2) or (3).
       (5) A description on how the Department will identify and 
     incorporate lessons learned from establishing and managing 
     JIEDDO and its programs.

     SEC. 1533. LIMITATION ON INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND 
                   RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT FOR OPERATION OBSERVANT 
                   COMPASS.

       None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for 
     operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in 
     the funding table in section 4302, may be obligated or 
     expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
     support for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary 
     of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a 
     report on Operation Observant Compass, including the specific 
     goals of the campaign to counter the Lord Resistance Army, 
     the precise metrics used to measure progress in such 
     campaign, and the required steps that will be taken to 
     transition such campaign if it is determined that it is no 
     longer necessary for the United States to support the mission 
     of such campaign.

     SEC. 1534. REPORT ON UNITED STATES FORCE LEVELS AND COSTS OF 
                   MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.

       Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House 
     of Representatives and Senate a report on the following:
       (1) The estimated United States force levels in Afghanistan 
     for each of years 2015 through 2020.
       (2) The estimated costs of United States military 
     operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal years 2015 
     through 2020.

                   TITLE XVI--INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

     SEC. 1601. PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING COMPLIANCE BY 
                   INSPECTOR GENERAL OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

       (a) Requirement for Periodic Audits of Contracting 
     Compliance.--The Inspector General of the Department of 
     Defense shall conduct periodic audits of contracting 
     practices and policies related to procurement under section 
     2533a of title 10, United States Code. Such an audit shall be 
     conducted at least once every three years.
       (b) Requirement for Additional Information in Semiannual 
     Reports.--The Inspector General of the Department of Defense 
     shall ensure that findings and other information resulting 
     from audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included 
     in the semiannual report transmitted to congressional 
     committees under section 8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act 
     of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App).

     SEC. 1602. EXPANSION OF THE PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 
                   PROGRAM TO ADVANCE SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH.

       (a) Advancing Small Business Growth.--
       (1) In general.--Chapter 142 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (A) by redesignating section 2419 as section 2420; and
       (B) by inserting after section 2418 the following new 
     section 2419:

     ``Sec. 2419. Advancing small business growth

       ``(a) Identification of Recommended Business Capabilities 
     and Characteristics.--(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for 
     Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall publish in the 
     Federal Register and on the website of the Office of Small 
     Business Programs of the Department of Defense a list of 
     capabilities and characteristics recommended for the 
     successful transition of a qualified small business concern 
     to become competitive as an other-than-small business for 
     contracts awarded by the Department of Defense. The 
     capabilities and characteristics on the list shall be set 
     forth by North American Industry Classification System 
     sector.
       ``(2) The list shall be reviewed and updated appropriately 
     on an annual basis.
       ``(b) Contract Clause Required.--(1) The Under Secretary 
     shall require the clause described in paragraph (2) to be 
     included in each covered contract awarded by the Department 
     of Defense.
       ``(2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause 
     that--
       ``(A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that 
     acceptance of the contract may cause the business to exceed 
     the applicable small business size standards (established 
     pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act) for the 
     industry concerned and that the contractor may no longer 
     qualify as a small business concern for that industry; and
       ``(B) encourages the contractor to develop capabilities and 
     characteristics identified in the list required by subsection 
     (a) if the contractor intends to remain competitive as an 
     other-than-small business in that industry.
       ``(c) Assistance for Advancing Certain Small Businesses.--
     Eligible small businesses may be provided specific assistance 
     with developing the capabilities and characteristics 
     identified in the list required by subsection (a), as part of 
     any procurement technical assistance furnished pursuant to 
     this chapter.
       ``(d) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `covered contract' means a contract--
       ``(A) awarded to a qualified small business concern as 
     defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act; 
     and
       ``(B) with an estimated annual value--
       ``(i) that will exceed the applicable receipt-based small 
     business size standard; or
       ``(ii) if the contract is in an industry with an employee-
     based size standard, that will exceed $70,000,000.
       ``(2) The term `eligible small business' means a qualified 
     small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of 
     the Small Business Act that has entered into a contract with 
     the Department of Defense that includes a contract clause 
     described in subsection (b)(2).''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections as the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item 
     relating to section 2419 and inserting the following:

``2419. Advancing small business growth.
``2420. Regulations.''.

       (b) Exception to Limitation on Funding.--Section 2414 of 
     such title is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The value'' and 
     inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (c), the 
     value''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection (c):
       ``(c) Exception.--The value of the assistance provided in 
     accordance with section 2419(c) of this title is not subject 
     to the limitations in subsection (a).''.

[[Page 8963]]

       (c) Revisions to Cooperative Agreements.--
       (1) Full funding allowed for certain assistance.--Section 
     2413(b) of such title is amended--
       (A) by striking ``except that in the case'' and inserting: 
     ``except that--
       ``(1) in the case'';
       (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
     and''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an entity 
     that provides specific assistance for eligible small 
     businesses pursuant to section 2419(c) of this title, the 
     Secretary may agree to furnish the full cost of such 
     assistance.''.
       (2) Additional considerations.--Section 2413 of such title 
     is further amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(e) In determining the level of funding to provide under 
     an agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
     consider the forecast by the eligible entity of demand for 
     procurement technical assistance, and, in the case of an 
     established program under this chapter, the outlays and 
     receipts of such program during prior years of operation.''.
       (3) Conforming amendment.--Section 2413(d) of such title is 
     amended by striking ``and in determining the level of funding 
     to provide under an agreement under subsection (b),''.
       (d) Report Required.--Not later than March 15 of 2015, 
     2016, and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on the 
     implementation of the amendments made by this section, along 
     with any recommendations for improving the Procurement 
     Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program.

     SEC. 1603. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL 
                   ASSISTANCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM.

       (a) Increase in Government Share.--Section 2413(b) of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by striking ``one-half'' both places it appears and 
     inserting ``65 percent''; and
       (2) by striking ``three-fourths'' and inserting ``75 
     percent''.
       (b) Increase in Limitations on Value of Assistance.--
     Section 2414(a) of such title is amended--
       (1) in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking ``$600,000'' and 
     inserting ``$750,000'';
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$300,000'' and 
     inserting ``$450,000''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$150,000'' and 
     inserting ``$300,000''.

     SEC. 1604. STRATEGIC PLAN FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR WAR RESERVE 
                   STOCKS OF MEALS READY-TO-EAT.

       (a) Limitation; Strategic Plan.--The Administrator of the 
     Defense Logistics Agency may not make any reductions in the 
     requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat 
     until the Administrator and the heads of the military 
     services, in consultation with manufacturers of meals ready-
     to-eat, develop a comprehensive strategic plan to address--
       (1) the aggregate meals ready-to-eat requirements for each 
     of the military departments;
       (2) industrial base sustainment and war-time surge capacity 
     requirements for meals ready-to-eat; and
       (3) timely rotation of the war reserves of meals-ready-to-
     eat.
       (b) Briefing Required.--The Administrator shall brief the 
     congressional defense committees on the strategic plan 
     developed under subsection (a) before making any reductions 
     in the requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-
     eat.

     SEC. 1605. FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SATELLITE SERVICES.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 135 of title 10, United States 
     Code, as amended by section 911(b) of this Act, is further 
     amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``Sec. 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services

       ``(a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of Defense may not enter 
     into a contract for satellite services with a foreign entity 
     if--
       ``(1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the 
     government of a covered foreign country has an ownership 
     interest; or
       ``(2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to provide 
     launch or other satellite services under the contract from a 
     covered foreign country.
       ``(b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     subsection (a) for a particular contract if the Secretary, in 
     consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, 
     submits to the congressional defense committees a national 
     security assessment for such contract that includes the 
     following:
       ``(1) The projected period of performance (including any 
     period covered by options to extend the contract), the 
     financial terms, and a description of the services to be 
     provided under the contract.
       ``(2) To the extent practicable, a description of the 
     ownership interest that a covered foreign country has in the 
     foreign entity providing satellite services to the Department 
     of Defense under the contract and the launch or other 
     satellite services that will be provided in a covered foreign 
     country under the contract.
       ``(3) A justification for entering into a contract with 
     such foreign entity and a description of the actions 
     necessary to eliminate the need to enter into such a contract 
     with such foreign entity in the future.
       ``(4) A risk assessment of entering into a contract with 
     such foreign entity, including an assessment of mission 
     assurance and security of information and a description of 
     any measures necessary to mitigate risks found by such risk 
     assessment.
       ``(c) Delegation of Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of 
     Defense may only delegate the authority under subsection (b) 
     to waive subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, 
     the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the Under 
     Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 
     Logistics and such authority may not be further delegated.
       ``(d) Form of Waiver Assessments.--Each assessment under 
     subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 
     may include a classified annex.
       ``(e) Covered Foreign Country Defined.--In this section, 
     the term `covered foreign country' means a country described 
     in section 1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 
     2019).''.
       (b) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections at 
     the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 911(c) 
     of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the 
     following item:

``2279. Foreign commercial satellite services.''.

     SEC. 1606. PROOF OF CONCEPT COMMERCIALIZATION PILOT PROGRAM.

       (a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary of Defense, acting 
     through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and 
     Engineering, shall establish and implement a pilot program, 
     to be known as the ``Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot 
     Program'', in accordance with this section.
       (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the pilot program is to 
     accelerate the commercialization of basic research 
     innovations from qualifying institutions.
       (c) Awards.--
       (1) In general.--Under the pilot program, the Secretary 
     shall make financial awards to qualifying institutions in 
     accordance with this subsection.
       (2) Competitive, merit-based process.--An award under the 
     pilot program shall be made using a competitive, merit-based 
     process.
       (3) Eligibility.--A qualifying institution shall be 
     eligible for an award under the pilot program if the 
     institution agrees to--
       (A) use funds from the award for the uses specified in 
     paragraph (5); and
       (B) oversee the use of the funds through--
       (i) a rigorous, diverse review board comprised of experts 
     in translational and proof of concept research, including 
     industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, 
     and business experts and university technology transfer 
     officials;
       (ii) technology validation milestones focused on market 
     feasibility;
       (iii) simple reporting on program progress; and
       (iv) a process to reallocate funding from poor performing 
     projects to those with more potential.
       (4) Criteria.--An award may be made under the pilot program 
     to a qualifying institution in accordance with the following 
     criteria:
       (A) The extent to which a qualifying institution--
       (i) has an established and proven technology transfer or 
     commercialization office and has a plan for engaging that 
     office in the program's implementation or has outlined an 
     innovative approach to technology transfer that has the 
     potential to increase or accelerate technology transfer 
     outcomes and can be adopted by other qualifying institutions;
       (ii) can assemble a project management board comprised of 
     industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, 
     and business experts;
       (iii) has an intellectual property rights strategy or 
     office; and
       (iv) demonstrates a plan for sustainability beyond the 
     duration of the funding from the award.
       (B) Such other criteria as the Secretary determines 
     necessary.
       (5) Use of award.--
       (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the funds 
     from an award may be used to evaluate the commercial 
     potential of existing discoveries, including activities that 
     contribute to determining a project's commercialization path, 
     including technical validations, market research, clarifying 
     intellectual property rights, and investigating commercial 
     and business opportunities.
       (B) Limitations.--
       (i) The amount of an award may not exceed $500,000 a year.
       (ii) Funds from an award may not be used for basic 
     research, or to fund the acquisition of research equipment or 
     supplies unrelated to commercialization activities.
       (d) Report.--Not later than one year after the 
     establishment of the pilot program, the Secretary shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees and to the 
     Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
     Transportation of the Senate a report evaluating the 
     effectiveness of the activities of the pilot program. The 
     report shall include--
       (1) a detailed description of the pilot program, including 
     incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts;
       (2) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program;
       (3) a detailed description of the institutional selection 
     process;
       (4) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the pilot 
     program; and
       (5) an analysis of the program's effectiveness, with data 
     supporting the analysis.
       (e) Qualifying Institution Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``qualifying institution'' means

[[Page 8964]]

     a nonprofit institution, as defined in section 4(3) of the 
     Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 
     3703(3)), or a Federal laboratory, as defined in section 4(4) 
     of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 
     U.S.C. 3703(4)).
       (f) Termination.--The pilot program conducted under this 
     section shall terminate on September 30, 2018.

            DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

     SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.

        This division may be cited as the ``Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014''.

     SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED 
                   TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW.

       (a) Expiration of Authorizations After Three Years.--Except 
     as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained 
     in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX of this division 
     for military construction projects, land acquisition, family 
     housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the 
     North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
     Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall 
     expire on the later of--
       (1) October 1, 2016; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
     for military construction for fiscal year 2017.
       (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
     authorizations for military construction projects, land 
     acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and 
     contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     Security Investment Program (and authorizations of 
     appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
     been obligated before the later of--
       (1) October 1, 2016; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
     for fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land 
     acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or 
     contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     Security Investment Program.

     SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE.

       Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect 
     on the later of--
       (1) October 1, 2013; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

                 TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                     Army: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Installation or
             State                     Location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska........................  Fort Wainwright.......      $103,000,000
Colorado......................  Fort Carson, Colorado.      $242,200,000
Florida.......................  Eglin AFB.............        $4,700,000
Georgia.......................  Fort Gordon...........       $61,000,000
Hawaii........................  Fort Shafter..........       $65,000,000
Kansas........................  Fort Leavenworth......       $17,000,000
Kentucky......................  Fort Campbell,                $4,800,000
                                 Kentucky.............
Maryland......................  Aberdeen Proving             $21,000,000
                                 Ground...............
                                Fort Detrick..........        $7,100,000
Missouri......................  Fort Leonard Wood.....       $90,700,000
North Carolina................  Fort Bragg............        $5,900,000
Texas.........................  Fort Bliss............       $46,800,000
Virginia......................  Joint Base Langley-          $50,000,000
                                 Eustis...............
Washington....................  Joint Base Lewis-           $144,000,000
                                 Mcchord..............
                                Yakima................         $9,100,00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out the military construction project for 
     the installation or location outside the United States, and 
     in the amount, set forth in the following table:

                     Army: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Country             Installation or Location       Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marshall Islands.............  Kwajalein Atoll.........      $63,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (c) Unspecified Worldwide.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military construction projects at 
     unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding 
     table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire 
     real property and carry out military construction projects 
     for unspecified installations or locations in the amounts set 
     forth in the following table:


                                                Army: Unspecified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Location                                  Location or Installation                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worldwide Unspecified..........................  Unspecified Worldwide Locations..................   $33,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.

       (a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts 
     appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations 
     in section 2103 and available for military family housing 
     functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 
     the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family 
     housing units (including land acquisition and supporting 
     facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number 
     of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following 
     table:

                                              Army: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Country                         Installation                    Units                Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany.................................  South Camp Vilseck........  29........................     $16,600,000

[[Page 8965]]

 
Wisconsin...............................  Fort McCoy................  56........................     $23,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (a) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2103 and available for military family housing functions as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary 
     of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering 
     services and construction design activities with respect to 
     the construction or improvement of family housing units in an 
     amount not to exceed $4,408,000.

     SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military 
     construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
     functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2104. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 
                   YEAR 2004 PROJECT.

       (a) Project Authorization.--In connection with the 
     authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1697) for 
     Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of a Research 
     and Development Loading Facility, the Secretary of the Army 
     may carry out a military construction project in the amount 
     of $4,500,000 to complete work on the facility within the 
     initial scope of the project.
       (b) Use of Unobligated Prior-year Army Military 
     Construction Funds.--For the project described in subsection 
     (a), the Secretary of the Army shall use unobligated Army 
     military construction funds that were appropriated for a 
     fiscal year before fiscal year 2014 and are available because 
     of savings resulting from favorable bids.
       (c) Congressional Notification.--The Secretary of the Army 
     shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) 
     of title 10, United States Code, regarding the project 
     described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to 
     exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall 
     utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title 
     regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations.

     SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111-84; 
     123 Stat. 2629) for Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of 
     APS Warehouses, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 
     74,976 square meters of hardstand parking, 22,741 square 
     meters of access roads, a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724 
     square meters of humidity-controlled warehouses.

     SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2101(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 
     4437) for Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Washington, for 
     construction of a Regional Logistics Support Complex, the 
     Secretary of the Army may construct up to 98,381 square yards 
     of Organizational Vehicle Parking.

     SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2010 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extensions.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
     (division B of Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2627), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2628) and 
     extended by section 2106 of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall remain in effect until 
     October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act 
     authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 
     2015, whichever is later:
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                                 Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                State                  Installation or Location             Project                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia.............................  Fort Belvoir............  Road and Access Control              $9,500,000
                                                                  Point......................
Washington...........................  Fort Lewis..............  Fort Lewis-McChord AFB Joint         $9,000,000
                                                                  Access.....................
Kuwait...............................  Camp Arifjian...........  APS Warehouses..............        $82,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extensions.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the 
     enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
     construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later:
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                                 Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 State                    Installation or Location              Project                Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California............................  Presidio of Monterey.......  Advanced Individual Training    $63,000,000
                                                                      Barracks....................
Georgia...............................  Fort Benning...............  Land Acquisition.............   $12,200,000
New Mexico............................  White Sands Missile Range..  Barracks.....................   $29,000,000
Germany...............................  Wiesbaden Air Base.........  Access Control Point.........    $5,100,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2204 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                         Navy: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     State                                  Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California....................................  Barstow........................................      $14,998,000
                                                Camp Pendleton, California.....................      $13,124,000
                                                Coronado.......................................       $8,910,000
                                                Point Mugu.....................................      $24,667,000

[[Page 8966]]

 
                                                Port Hueneme...................................      $33,600,000
                                                San Diego......................................      $34,331,000
                                                Twentynine Palms, California...................      $33,437,000
Florida.......................................  Jacksonville...................................      $20,752,000
                                                Key West.......................................      $14,001,000
                                                Mayport........................................      $16,093,000
Georgia.......................................  Albany.........................................      $16,610,000
                                                Savannah.......................................      $61,717,000
Guam..........................................  Joint Region Marianas..........................     $318,377,000
Hawaii........................................  Kaneohe Bay....................................     $236,982,000
                                                Pearl City.....................................      $30,100,000
                                                Pearl Harbor...................................      $57,998,000
Illinois......................................  Great Lakes....................................      $35,851,000
Maryland......................................  Fort Meade.....................................      $83,988,000
Maine.........................................  Bangor.........................................      $13,800,000
                                                Kittery........................................      $11,522,000
North Carolina................................  Camp Lejeune, North Carolina...................      $77,999,000
                                                New River......................................      $45,863,000
Nevada........................................  Fallon.........................................      $11,334,000
Oklahoma......................................  Tinker Air Force Base..........................      $14,144,000
Rhode Island..................................  Newport........................................      $12,422,000
South Carolina................................  Charleston.....................................      $73,932,000
Virginia......................................  Dam Neck.......................................      $10,587,000
                                                Norfolk........................................       $3,380,000
                                                Quantico.......................................      $38,374,000
                                                Yorktown.......................................      $18,700,000
Washington....................................  Bremerton......................................      $18,189,000
                                                Whidbey Island.................................     $117,649,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2204 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installation or location outside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                         Navy: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                 Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Djibouti......................................  Camp Lemonier...................................     $29,000,000
Japan.........................................  Camp Butler.....................................      $5,820,000
Japan.........................................  Yokosuka........................................      $7,568,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.

        Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military 
     family housing functions as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out 
     architectural and engineering services and construction 
     design activities with respect to the construction or 
     improvement of family housing units in an amount not to 
     exceed $4,438,000.

     SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

        Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
     and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military 
     family housing functions as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing 
     military family housing units in an amount not to exceed 
     $68,969,000.

     SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military 
     construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
     functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2205. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 
                   CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.

       The Secretary of the Navy may not obligate or expend any 
     funds authorized in this title for land acquisition related 
     to the Townsend Bombing Range near Savannah, Georgia, until 
     the Secretary certifies in writing to the congressional 
     defense committees that the Secretary has entered into 
     mutually-acceptable agreements with the governments of Long 
     and McIntosh Counties, Georgia, that--
       (1) include specific arrangements to mitigate any economic 
     hardships to be incurred by the counties as a result of 
     revenue loss caused by the acquisition; or
       (2) affirm that no compensation is required from the 
     Secretary before the acquisition proceeds.

     SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 
     124 Stat. 4441) for Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction 
     of Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary 
     of the Navy may construct additional Type C earth covered 
     magazines (to provide a project total of eighteen), ten new 
     modular storage magazines, an inert storage facility, a 
     maintenance and ground support equipment facility, concrete 
     pads for portable ready service lockers, and associated 
     supporting facilities using appropriations available for the 
     project.

     SEC. 2207. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT.

       In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1666) for Kitsap, Washington, for construction of 
     Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy 
     may construct new hardened facilities in lieu of hardening 
     existing structures and a new facility to replace the 
     existing Coast Guard Maritime Force Protection Unit and the 
     Naval Undersea Warfare Command unhardened facilities using 
     appropriations available for the project.

[[Page 8967]]



     SEC. 2208. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the 
     enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
     construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                                 Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              State/Country                Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain.................................  Southwest Asia............  Navy Central Command           $89,280,000
                                                                       Ammunition Magazines.....
Guam....................................  Naval Activities..........  Defense Access Roads           $66,730,000
                                                                       Improvements.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2304 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                       Air Force: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      State                                 Installation or Location                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona.........................................  Luke Air Force Base........................        $26,900,000
California......................................  Beale Air Force Base.......................        $62,000,000
Florida.........................................  Tyndall Air Force Base.....................         $9,100,000
Guam............................................  Joint Region Marianas......................       $176,230,000
Hawaii..........................................  Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam.............         $4,800,000
Kansas..........................................  McConnell Air Force Base...................       $219,120,000
Kentucky........................................  Fort Campbell, Kentucky....................         $8,000,000
Mariana Islands.................................  Saipan.....................................        $29,300,000
Maryland........................................  Fort Meade.................................       $358,000,000
                                                  Joint Base Andrews.........................        $30,000,000
Missouri........................................  Whiteman Air Force Base....................         $5,900,000
North Dakota....................................  Minot Air Force Base.......................        $23,830,000
New Mexico......................................  Cannon Air Force Base......................        $34,100,000
                                                  Holloman Air Force Base....................         $2,250,000
                                                  Kirtland Air Force Base....................        $30,500,000
Nevada..........................................  Nellis Air Force Base......................        $78,500,000
Oklahoma........................................  Altus Air Force Base.......................        $30,850,000
                                                  Tinker Air Force Base......................         $8,600,000
Texas...........................................  Fort Bliss.................................         $3,350,000
Utah............................................  Hill Air Force Base........................        $32,000,000
Virginia........................................  Joint Base Langley-Eustis..................         $4,800,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2304 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations outside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                      Air Force: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                        Installation                       Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenland......................................  Thule AB.......................................     $43,904,000
United Kingdom.................................  RAF Lakenheath.................................     $22,047,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.

        Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military 
     family housing functions as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out 
     architectural and engineering services and construction 
     design activities with respect to the construction or 
     improvement of family housing units in an amount not to 
     exceed $4,267,000.

     SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

        Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, 
     and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military 
     family housing functions as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve 
     existing military family housing units in an amount not to 
     exceed $72,093,000.

     SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military 
     construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
     functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in 
     the funding table in section 4601.

     SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT.

        The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating 
     to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, for construction of a 
     hangar by striking ``$58,000,000'' in the amount column and 
     inserting ``$128,000,000''.

[[Page 8968]]



     SEC. 2306. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 
                   CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.

       The Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate or expend 
     any funds authorized in this title for the construction of a 
     maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport 
     storage facility at Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern 
     Mariana Islands, until the Secretary certifies to Congress 
     that the Secretary will purchase an interest in the real 
     estate associated with these military construction projects.

     SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECT.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall 
     remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the 
     enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
     construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                               Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 State                   Installation or Location             Project                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain...............................  Southwest Asia...........  North Apron Expansion.......      $45,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

               Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

     SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for military construction projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations inside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                   Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      State                                 Installation or Location                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska..........................................  Clear Air Force Base.......................        $17,204,000
                                                  Fort Greely................................        $82,000,000
California......................................  Brawley....................................        $23,095,000
                                                  Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy...........        $37,554,000
                                                  Miramar....................................         $6,000,000
Colorado........................................  Fort Carson, Colorado......................        $22,282,000
Florida.........................................  Hurlburt Field.............................         $7,900,000
                                                  Jacksonville...............................         $7,500,000
                                                  Panama City................................         $2,600,000
                                                  Tyndall Air Force Base.....................         $9,500,000
Georgia.........................................  Fort Benning...............................        $43,335,000
                                                  Fort Stewart, Georgia......................        $44,504,000
                                                  Hunter Army Airfield.......................        $13,500,000
                                                  Moody Air Force Base.......................         $3,800,000
Hawaii..........................................  Ford Island................................         $2,615,000
                                                  Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam.............         $2,800,000
Kentucky........................................  Fort Campbell, Kentucky....................       $124,211,000
                                                  Fort Knox..................................       $303,023,000
Massachusetts...................................  Hanscom Air Force Base.....................        $36,213,000
Maryland........................................  Aberdeen Proving Ground....................       $210,000,000
                                                  Bethesda Naval Hospital....................        $66,800,000
North Carolina..................................  Camp Lejeune...............................        $28,977,000
                                                  Fort Bragg.................................       $172,065,000
North Dakota....................................  Minot Air Force Base.......................         $6,400,000
New Jersey......................................  Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst...........        $10,000,000
New Mexico......................................  Holloman Air Force Base....................        $81,400,000
Oklahoma........................................  Altus Air Force Base.......................         $2,100,000
                                                  Tinker Air Force Base......................        $36,000,000
Pennsylvania....................................  Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland..         $9,000,000
South Carolina..................................  Beaufort...................................        $41,324,000
Tennessee.......................................  Arnold Air Force Base......................         $2,200,000
Texas...........................................  Joint Base San Antonio.....................        $12,600,000
Virginia........................................  Defense Distribution Depot Richmond........        $87,000,000
                                                  Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek -            $30,404,000
                                                   Story.....................................
                                                  Pentagon...................................        $59,450,000
                                                  Quantico...................................        $40,586,000
Washington......................................  Whidbey Island.............................        $10,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for military construction projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     installations or locations outside the United States, and in 
     the amounts, set forth in the following table:

[[Page 8969]]



                                   Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Country                                Installation or Location                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain Island..................................  Southwest Asia.............................        $45,400,000
Belgium.........................................  Brussels...................................        $67,613,000
Germany.........................................  Kaiserlautern Air Base.....................        $49,907,000
                                                  Ramstein Air Base..........................        $98,762,000
                                                  Weisbaden..................................       $109,655,000
Japan...........................................  Atsugi.....................................         $4,100,000
                                                  Iwakuni....................................        $34,000,000
                                                  Kadena Air Base............................        $38,792,000
                                                  Torri Commo Station........................        $63,621,000
                                                  Yokosuka...................................        $10,600,000
Korea, Republic Of..............................  Camp Walker................................        $52,164,000
United Kingdom..................................  Raf Mildenhall.............................        $84,629,000
                                                  Royal Air Force Lakenheath.................        $69,638,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (c) Unspecified Classified.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for military construction projects at 
     unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding 
     table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire 
     real property and carry out military construction projects 
     for unspecified installations or locations in the amounts set 
     forth in the following table:


                                          Defense Agencies: Classified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Location                                  Location or Installation                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worldwide Classified...........................  Classified Worldwide Locations...................   $15,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.

       (a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for energy conservation projects inside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy 
     conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United 
     States Code, for the installations or locations inside the 
     United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
     table:

                             Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     State                                 Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................  Anniston Army Depot.........................         $2,700,000
California.....................................  MCAS Miramar................................        $17,968,000
                                                 Parks DRTA..................................         $4,150,000
Florida........................................  NAS Jacksonville............................         $2,840,000
Hawaii.........................................  Camp Smith..................................         $7,966,000
                                                 Hickam......................................         $3,100,000
                                                 Hickam......................................         $3,000,000
Indiana........................................  Mt. Home....................................         $2,630,000
Kansas.........................................  Tokepka Readiness Center....................         $2,050,000
Massachusetts..................................  Devens......................................         $2,600,000
New York.......................................  US Military Academy.........................         $3,200,000
South Carolina.................................  Shaw........................................         $2,500,000
Texas..........................................  NAS Corpus Christi..........................         $2,340,000
                                                 Sheppard....................................         $3,779,000
                                                 Laughlin....................................         $2,800,000
Utah...........................................  Dugway Proving Ground.......................         $9,966,000
                                                 Tooele Army Depot...........................         $5,900,000
                                                 Tooele Army Depot...........................         $5,500,000
                                                 Tooele Army Depot...........................         $4,300,000
Virginia.......................................  NSA Hampton Roads...........................         $4,060,000
                                                 Pentagon....................................         $2,120,000
Various Locations..............................  Various Locations...........................        $20,476,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated 
     pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
     2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside 
     the United States as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy 
     conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United 
     States Code, for the installations or locations outside the 
     United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
     table:

                             Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                Installation or Location                  Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Italy..........................................  NAS Sigonella...............................         $3,300,000
Japan..........................................  CFA Sasebo..................................        $14,766,000
Japan..........................................  Yokota......................................         $5,674,000
Germany........................................  Ramstein....................................         $2,140,000
Greenland......................................  Thule.......................................         $5,175,000
Various Locations..............................  Various Locations...........................         $3,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 8970]]

     SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military 
     construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 
     functions of the Department of Defense (other than the 
     military departments), as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601.

          Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

     SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL 
                   DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military 
     construction and land acquisition for chemical 
     demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601.

   TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT 
                                PROGRAM

     SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECTS.

        The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the 
     North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
     Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United 
     States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount 
     authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 
     2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty 
     Organization as a result of construction previously financed 
     by the United States.

     SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.

        Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for contributions 
     by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, 
     United States Code, for the share of the United States of the 
     cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
     Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4601.

            TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

 Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
                   LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and 
     in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

              Army National Guard: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             State                      Location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................  Decatur...............       $4,000,000
Arkansas.......................  Fort Chaffee..........      $21,000,000
Florida........................  Pinellas Park.........       $5,700,000
Illinois.......................  Kankakee..............      $42,000,000
Massachusetts..................  Camp Edwards..........      $19,000,000
Michigan.......................  Camp Grayling.........      $17,000,000
Minnesota......................  Stillwater............      $17,000,000
Missouri.......................  Macon.................       $9,100,000
                                 Whiteman AFB..........       $5,000,000
Mississippi....................  Camp Shelby...........       $3,000,000
                                 Pascagoula............       $4,500,000
New York.......................  New York..............      $31,000,000
Ohio...........................  Ravenna Army                 $5,200,000
                                  Ammunition Plant.
Pennsylvania...................  Fort Indiantown Gap...      $40,000,000
Puerto Rico....................  Camp Santiago.........       $5,600,000
South Carolina.................  Greenville............      $26,000,000
Texas..........................  Fort Worth............      $14,270,000
Wyoming........................  Afton.................      $10,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the 
     amounts, set forth in the following table:

                              Army Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             State                      Location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.....................  Camp Parks............      $17,500,000
                                 Fort Hunter Liggett...      $16,500,000
Maryland.......................  Bowie.................      $25,500,000
North Carolina.................  Fort Bragg............      $24,500,000
New Jersey.....................  Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-     $36,200,000
                                  Lakehurst.
New York.......................  Bullville.............      $14,500,000
Wisconsin......................  Fort Mccoy............      $23,400,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
                   CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

       Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 
     Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real 
     property and carry out military construction projects for the 
     Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the 
     United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
     table:

[[Page 8971]]



                  Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            State                      Location               Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California...................  March Air Force Base....      $11,086,000
Missouri.....................  Kansas City.............      $15,020,000
Tennessee....................  Memphis.................       $4,330,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
                   LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

        Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the 
     National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table 
     in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire 
     real property and carry out military construction projects 
     for the Air National Guard locations inside the United 
     States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                                               Air National Guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     State                                          Location                          Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................  Birmingham International Airport..............       $8,500,000
Indiana........................................  Hulman Regional Airport.......................       $7,300,000
Montana........................................  Great Falls International Airport.............      $22,000,000
New York.......................................  Fort Drum, New York...........................       $4,700,000
Ohio...........................................  Springfield Beckley-Map.......................       $7,200,000
Pennsylvania...................................  Fort Indiantown Gap...........................       $7,700,000
Rhode Island...................................  Quonset State Airport.........................       $6,000,000
Tennessee......................................  Mcghee-Tyson Airport..........................      $18,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
                   ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

        Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the 
     National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table 
     in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire 
     real property and carry out military construction projects 
     for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, 
     and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

                            Air Force Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            State                      Location               Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California...................  March Air Force Base....      $19,900,000
Florida......................  Homestead Air Reserve          $9,800,000
                                Base.
Oklahoma.....................  Tinker Air Force Base...      $12,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 
                   AND RESERVE.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for the costs of 
     acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and 
     construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, 
     and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 
     10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of 
     land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table 
     in section 4601.

                       Subtitle B--Other Matters

     SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT.

        In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
     section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 
     Stat. 2135) for Fort Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a 
     Joint Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the 
     Navy may, instead of constructing a new facility at Camp 
     Dodge, acquire up to approximately 20 acres to construct a 
     Joint Reserve Center and associated supporting facilities in 
     the greater Des Moines, Iowa, area using amounts appropriated 
     for the project pursuant to the authorization of 
     appropriations in section 2606 of such Act (126 Stat. 2136).

     SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
                   2011 PROJECTS.

       (a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the 
     Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
     (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the 
     authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as 
     provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2604 of that Act (124 
     Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454), shall remain in effect until October 
     1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 
     funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, 
     whichever is later.
       (b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as 
     follows:

                       Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  State                     Installation or Location             Project               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puerto Rice.............................  Camp Santiago..............  Multi Purpose Machine Gun      $9,200,000
                                                                        Range.....................
Tennessee...............................  Nashville International      Intelligence Group and         $5,500,000
                                           Airport...................   Remotely Piloted Aircraft
                                                                        Remote Split Operations
                                                                        Group.....................
Virginia................................  Fort Story.................  Army Reserve Center........   $11,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 8972]]

          TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

              Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

     SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE 
                   REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED 
                   THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE 
                   ACCOUNT.

        Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2013, for base 
     realignment and closure activities, including real property 
     acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized 
     by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part 
     A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) 
     and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure 
     Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended 
     by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in 
     section 4601.

                       Subtitle B--Other Matters

     SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE 
                   REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND.

       Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an 
     additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round, and 
     none of the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization 
     of appropriations contained in this Act may be used to 
     propose, plan for, or execute an additional BRAC round.

     SEC. 2712. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT 
                   REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HEALTH CARE 
                   IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.

       Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of 
     Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking 
     ``on a quarterly basis''.

         TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

 Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 
                                Changes

     SEC. 2801. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT UNSPECIFIED 
                   MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

       (a) Increased Threshold for Application of Secretory 
     Approval and Congressional Notification Requirements.--
     Subsection (b)(1) of section 2805 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by striking ``$750,000'' and inserting 
     ``$1,000,000''.
       (b) Increase in Maximum Amount of Operation and Maintenance 
     Funds Authorized to Be Used for Certain Projects.--Subsection 
     (c)(1)(B) of such section is amended by striking ``$750,000'' 
     and inserting ``$1,000,000''.
       (c) Annual Location Adjustment of Dollar Limitations.--Such 
     section is further amended by adding at the end the following 
     new subsection:
       ``(f) Adjustment of Dollar Limitations for Location.--Each 
     fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar 
     limitations specified in this section applicable to an 
     unspecified minor military construction project to reflect 
     the area construction cost index for military construction 
     projects published by the Department of Defense during the 
     prior fiscal year for the location of the project.''.

     SEC. 2802. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL COMPARABILITY OF 
                   ROOM PATTERNS AND FLOOR AREAS FOR MILITARY 
                   FAMILY HOUSING AND SUBMISSION OF NET FLOOR AREA 
                   INFORMATION.

       (a) Repeal.--Section 2826 of title 10, United States Code, 
     is repealed.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 2826.

     SEC. 2803. REPEAL OF SEPARATE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LIMITED 
                   PARTNERSHIPS WITH PRIVATE DEVELOPERS OF 
                   HOUSING.

       (a) Repeal.--
       (1) In general.--Section 2837 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is repealed.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 2837.
       (b) Effect on Existing Contracts.--The repeal of section 
     2837 of title 10, United States Code, shall not affect the 
     validity or terms of any contract in connection with a 
     limited partnership under subsection (a) or a collateral 
     incentive agreement under subsection (b) of such section 
     entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (c) Effect on Defense Housing Investment Account.--Any 
     unobligated amounts remaining in the Defense Housing 
     Investment Account on the date of the enactment of this Act 
     shall be transferred to the Department of Defense Family 
     Housing Improvement Fund. Amounts transferred shall be merged 
     with amounts in such fund and shall be available for the same 
     purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, 
     as amounts in such fund.

     SEC. 2804. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS TO REDUCE 
                   VULNERABILITY OF STRUCTURES TO TERRORIST 
                   ATTACK.

       Section 2859(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``develop construction standards 
     designed'' and inserting ``develop construction standards 
     that, taking into consideration the probability of a 
     terrorist attack, are designed''.

     SEC. 2805. TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR PROVIDING 
                   UTILITIES AND SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH USE 
                   OF ALTERNATIVE AUTHORITY FOR ACQUISITION AND 
                   IMPROVEMENT OF MILITARY HOUSING.

       (a) Crediting of Payments.--Section 2872a(c)(2) of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``from which 
     the cost of furnishing the utilities or services concerned 
     was paid'' and inserting ``available to the Secretary 
     concerned to furnish utilities or services under subsection 
     (a)''.
       (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by 
     subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to cash payments 
     received under subsection (c)(1) of section 2872a of title 
     10, United States Code, as reimbursement for utilities or 
     services furnished, after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, under subsection (a) of such section.

     SEC. 2806. REPEAL OF ADVANCE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR USE 
                   OF MILITARY HOUSING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY.

       Section 2875 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     striking subsection (e).

     SEC. 2807. ADDITIONAL ELEMENT FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 
                   HOUSING PRIVATIZATION PROJECTS.

       Section 2884(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
     following: ``, to specifically include any variances 
     associated with litigation costs''.

     SEC. 2808. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHORITY TO USE 
                   OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR 
                   CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN CERTAIN AREAS OUTSIDE 
                   THE UNITED STATES.

       Section 2808(h) of the Military Construction Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 
     117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2149), is 
     further amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``September 30, 2013'' 
     and inserting ``September 30, 2014''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and 
     inserting ``fiscal year 2015''.

        Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

     SEC. 2811. CODIFICATION OF POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS 
                   REGARDING CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF UNITED 
                   STATES MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN FOREIGN 
                   COUNTRIES.

       (a) Redesignation of Existing Reporting Requirement.--
     Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
     (a) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
       (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of 
     subsection (b) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), 
     respectively, and in subparagraph (A), as redesignated, by 
     striking ``subsection (a)(2)'' and inserting ``paragraph 
     (1)(B)'';
       (3) by striking ``(b) Report Elements.--A report under 
     subsection (a)'' and inserting ``(2) A report under paragraph 
     (1)''; and
       (4) by striking ``(a) Annual Status Report.--''and 
     inserting ``(b) Annual Report on Status of Overseas Closures 
     and Realignments and Master Plans.--(1)''.
       (b) Transfer of Provisions.--
       (1) Sense of congress.--Subsection (a) of section 2921 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 
     (Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)--
       (A) is transferred to section 2687a of title 10, United 
     States Code; and
       (B) is inserted after the heading of such section as 
     subsection (a).
       (2) Other provisions.--Subsections (c), (d), (f), and (g) 
     of such section 2921--
       (A) are transferred to section 2687a of title 10, United 
     States Code;
       (B) are inserted at the end of such section in that order; 
     and
       (C) are redesignated as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) 
     of such section; respectively.
       (3) Definitions.--Section 2687a of title 10, United States 
     Code, is further amended by adding after subsection (f), as 
     added and redesignated by paragraph (2), the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `fair market value of the improvements' 
     means the value of improvements determined by the Secretary 
     of Defense on the basis of their highest use.
       ``(2) The term `improvements' includes new construction of 
     facilities and all additions, improvements, modifications, or 
     renovations made to existing facilities or to real property, 
     without regard to whether they were carried out with 
     appropriated or nonappropriated funds.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 2687a of title 10, 
     United States Code, is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (c), as transferred and redesignated by 
     subsection (b)(2)--
       (A) in paragraph (1)--
       (i) by striking ``Establishment of'';
       (ii) by striking the first sentence; and
       (iii) in the second sentence, by striking ``such account'' 
     and inserting ``the Department of Defense Overseas Military 
     Facility Investment Recovery Account''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``Armed Forces'' and 
     inserting ``armed forces'';
       (2) in subsection (d), as transferred and redesignated by 
     subsection (b)(2)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``(Public Law 100-526; 
     10 U.S.C. 2687 note)'' after ``Realignment Act''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2)--
       (i) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``section 2685 of 
     title 10, United States Code'' and inserting ``section 2685 
     of this title''; and

[[Page 8973]]

       (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Armed Forces'' both 
     places it appears and inserting ``armed forces''; and
       (3) in subsection (f), as transferred and redesignated by 
     subsection (b)(2), by striking ``section 480 of title 10, 
     United States Code'' in paragraph (3) and inserting ``section 
     480 of this title 10''.
       (d) Repeal of Superseded Provisions.--
       (1) Repeal.--Section 2921 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510; 
     10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is repealed.
       (2) Treatment of special account.--The repeal of such 
     section shall not affect the Department of Defense Overseas 
     Military Facility Investment Recovery Account established by 
     subsection (c)(1) of such section, amounts in such account, 
     or the continued use of such account as provided in section 
     2687a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this 
     section.

                      Subtitle C--Energy Security

     SEC. 2821. CONTINUATION OF LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR 
                   LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 
                   (LEED) GOLD OR PLATINUM CERTIFICATION.

       Section 2830(b)(1) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public 
     Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1695), as amended by section 2823(b) of 
     the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2153), is 
     amended by striking ``or 2013'' and inserting ``, 2013, or 
     2014''.

  Subtitle D--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

     SEC. 2831. CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR TO PREVIOUS 
                   FISCAL YEAR FOR PERIOD COVERED BY ANNUAL REPORT 
                   OF INTERAGENCY COORDINATION GROUP OF INSPECTORS 
                   GENERAL FOR GUAM REALIGNMENT.

       Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 
     U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended in the first sentence by 
     striking ``calendar year'' and inserting ``fiscal year''.

     SEC. 2832. REPEAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON REALIGNMENT OF 
                   MARINE CORPS FORCES IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION.

       Section 2832 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
     for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 
     Stat. 2155) is repealed.

                      Subtitle E--Land Conveyances

     SEC. 2841. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION, NAVAL BASE VENTURA 
                   COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Authority.--The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all 
     right, title, and interest in and to real property, including 
     improvements thereon, located at Naval Base Ventura County, 
     California, that was initially constructed under the former 
     section 2828(g) of title 10, United States Code (commonly 
     known as the ``Build to Lease program''), as added by section 
     801 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 
     (Public Law 98-115; 97 Stat 782).
       (b) Use.--Upon acquiring the real property under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary of the Navy may use the improvements as 
     provided in sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United 
     States Code.

     SEC. 2842. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER OXNARD AIR FORCE BASE, 
                   VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may 
     convey, without consideration, to Ventura County, California 
     (in this section referred to as the ``County''), all right, 
     title, and interest of the United States in and to the real 
     property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of 
     former Oxnard Air Force Base for the purpose of permitting 
     the County to use the property for public purposes.
       (b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall 
     require the County to cover costs (except costs for 
     environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by 
     the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs 
     incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under 
     subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for 
     environmental documentation, and any other administrative 
     costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 
     from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring the 
     actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs 
     actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 
     conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 
     the County.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (c) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
     description of the property to be conveyed under subsection 
     (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
     Secretary of the Navy.
       (d) Additional Terms.--The Secretary of the Navy may 
     require such additional terms and conditions in connection 
     with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
     protect the interests of the United States.

     SEC. 2843. LAND CONVEYANCE, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL SHIPYARD, 
                   PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may 
     convey to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (in this 
     section referred to as the ``Port Authority'') all right, 
     title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel 
     of real property, including any improvements thereon, 
     consisting of approximately .595 acres located at the 
     Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The 
     Secretary may void any land use restrictions associated with 
     the property to be conveyed under this subsection.
       (b) Consideration.--
       (1) Amount and determination.--As consideration for the 
     conveyance under subsection (a), the Port Authority shall pay 
     to the Secretary of the Navy an amount that is not less than 
     the fair market value of the property conveyed, as determined 
     by the Secretary. The Secretary's determination of fair 
     market value shall be final. In lieu of all or a portion of 
     cash payment of consideration, the Secretary may accept in-
     kind consideration.
       (2) Treatment of cash consideration.--The Secretary shall 
     deposit any cash payment received under paragraph (1) in the 
     special account in the Treasury established for that 
     Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, 
     United States Code. The entire amount deposited shall be 
     available for use in accordance with paragraph (1)(D) of such 
     subsection.
       (c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall 
     require the Port Authority to reimburse the Secretary to 
     cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of 
     the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to 
     reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, 
     to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including 
     survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, 
     and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. 
     If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary 
     incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds 
     the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 
     conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 
     the Port Authority.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account 
     and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to 
     the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund 
     or account.
       (d) Compliance With Environmental Laws.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed to affect or limit the application 
     of, or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, 
     including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
     Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et 
     seq.) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et 
     seq.).
       (e) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
     description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed 
     under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey 
     satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.
       (f) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the 
     Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.

     SEC. 2844. LAND CONVEYANCE, CAMP WILLIAMS, UTAH.

       (a) Conveyance Required.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
     Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land Management, shall 
     convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
     certain lands comprising approximately 420 acres, as 
     generally depicted on a map entitled ``Proposed Camp Williams 
     Land Transfer'' and dated June 14, 2011, which are located 
     within the boundaries of the public lands currently withdrawn 
     for military use by the Utah National Guard and known as Camp 
     Williams, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the Utah 
     National Guard to use the conveyed land as provided in 
     subsection (c).
       (b) Supersedence of Executive Order.--Executive Order No. 
     1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by section 907 of the Camp 
     W.G. Williams Land Exchange Act of 1989 (title IX of Public 
     Law 101-628; 104 Stat. 4501), is hereby superseded, only 
     insofar as it affects the lands identified for conveyance to 
     the State of Utah under subsection (a).
       (c) Reversionary Interest.--The lands conveyed to the State 
     of Utah under subsection (a) shall revert to the United 
     States if the Secretary of Defense determines that the land, 
     or any portion thereof, is sold or attempted to be sold, or 
     that the land, or any portion thereof, is used for non-
     National Guard or non-national defense purposes.
       (d) Hazardous Materials.--With respect to any portion of 
     the land conveyed under subsection (a) that the Secretary of 
     Defense determines is subject to reversion under subsection 
     (c), if the Secretary of Defense also determines that the 
     portion of the conveyed land contains hazardous materials, 
     the State of Utah shall pay the United States an amount equal 
     to the fair market value of that portion of the land, and the 
     reversionary interest shall not apply to that portion of the 
     land.

[[Page 8974]]



     SEC. 2845. CONVEYANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD RADAR SITE, FRANCIS 
                   PEAK, WASATCH MOUNTAINS, UTAH.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Air Force 
     may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah (in 
     this section referred to as the ``State''), all right, title, 
     and interest of the United States in and to the structures, 
     including equipment and any other personal property related 
     thereto, comprising the Air National Guard radar site located 
     on Francis Peak, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the 
     State to use the structures to support emergency public 
     safety communications, including 911 emergency response 
     service for Northern Utah.
       (b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Air Force may 
     require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the 
     Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred 
     by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under 
     subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to 
     environmental documentation, and other administrative costs 
     related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary 
     in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the 
     Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall 
     refund the excess amount to the State.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by 
     the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (c) Description of Property.--The exact inventory of 
     equipment and other personal property to be conveyed under 
     subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary of the 
     Air Force.
       (d) Time of Conveyance.--The conveyance under this section 
     shall occur as soon as practicable after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act. Until such time as the conveyance 
     occurs, the Secretary of the Air Force shall take no action 
     with regard to the structures described in subsection (a) 
     that will result in the likely disruption of emergency 
     communications by the State and local authorities.
       (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the 
     Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in 
     connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.
       (f) Continuation of Land Use Permit.--The conveyance of the 
     structures under subsection (a) shall not affect the validity 
     and continued applicability of the land use permit, in effect 
     on the date of the enactment of this Act, that was issued by 
     the Forest Service for placement and use of the structures.
       (g) Duration of Authority.--The authority to make a 
     conveyance under this section shall expire on the later of--
       (1) September 30, 2014; or
       (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
     for military construction for fiscal year 2015.

     SEC. 2846. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER FORT MONROE, HAMPTON, 
                   VIRGINIA.

       (a) Sense of Congress Regarding Need for Conveyance.--It is 
     the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the historic features of former Fort Monroe in Hampton, 
     Virginia, are being degraded because of the lack of 
     Department of the Army facility sustainment associated with 
     the former Fort Monroe; and
       (2) it is in the best interest of the Secretary of the Army 
     and the Commonwealth of Virginia (in this section referred to 
     as the ``Commonwealth'') to expeditiously convey, consistent 
     with the Fort Monroe Reuse Plan and the Programmatic 
     Agreement dated April 27, 2009, certain portions of former 
     Fort Monroe to the Commonwealth.
       (b) Conveyance Authorized.--Pursuant to 2905(b)(4) of the 
     Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of 
     title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), the 
     Secretary of the Army shall convey to the Commonwealth all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
     approximately 70.431 acres of real property at former Fort 
     Monroe depicted as areas 4-1 and 4-2 on the map titled ``Plat 
     Showing 8 Parcels of Land Totaling +/-564.519 Acres Situated 
     on Fort Monroe, Virginia, Boundary Survey'', prepared by the 
     Norfolk District, Army Corps of Engineers, and dated August 
     17, 2009 (in this section referred to as the ``Map'').
       (c) Timing of Conveyance.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
     exercise the authority provided by subsection (b) only 
     concurrent, as near in time as possible, with the reversion 
     to the Commonwealth of approximately 371.77 acres of property 
     depicted as areas 3 and 5 on the Map.
       (d) Conditions of Conveyance.--As a condition of the 
     conveyance of real property under subsection (b)--
       (1) the Commonwealth shall enter into an agreement with the 
     Secretary of the Army to share equally with the United 
     States, after conveyance of property areas 4-1 and 4-2, the 
     net proceeds derived from any subsequent conveyance of these 
     parcels to third-party buyers or from any lease of areas 4-1 
     or 4-2, payable over a period of seven years following the 
     conveyance by the Secretary;
       (2) the parties shall agree to transfer authority over the 
     utility systems at Fort Monroe to the Commonwealth in return 
     for receiving service on the same relative terms and 
     conditions that the Department of the Army provided service 
     during its ownership of the utilities; and
       (3) the Secretary will resolve all issues with Dominion 
     Virginia Power and will be responsible for maintaining 
     electrical service in its name until such resolution has been 
     obtained.
       (e) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed to affect or limit the application of, or any 
     obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including 
     the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
     Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and the Solid 
     Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).
       (f) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The parties may agree 
     to such additional terms and conditions in connection with 
     the conveyance under this section as the parties consider 
     appropriate to protect their respective interests.

     SEC. 2847. LAND CONVEYANCE, MIFFLIN COUNTY UNITED STATES ARMY 
                   RESERVE CENTER, LEWISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may 
     convey, without consideration, to Derry Township, 
     Pennsylvania (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Township''), all right, title, and interest of the United 
     States in and to a parcel of real property, including any 
     improvements thereon and improvements related thereto, 
     consisting of approximately 4.52 acres and containing the 
     Mifflin County Army Reserve Center located at 73 Reserve 
     Lane, Lewistown, Pennsylvania (parcel number 16,01-0113J), 
     for the purpose of permitting the Township to use the parcel 
     for a regional police headquarters or other public purposes.
       (b) Interim Lease.--Until such time as the real property 
     described in subsection (a) is conveyed to the Township, the 
     Secretary may lease the property to the Township.
       (c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
       (1) Payment required.--The Secretary shall require the 
     Township to cover costs (except costs for environmental 
     remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, 
     or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the 
     Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), 
     including survey costs, costs for environmental 
     documentation, and any other administrative costs related to 
     the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Township in 
     advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the 
     amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the 
     Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall 
     refund the excess amount to the Township.
       (2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as 
     reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 
     fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
     by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so 
     credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
     account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
     subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in 
     such fund or account.
       (d) Conditions of Conveyance.--The conveyance of the real 
     property under subsection (a) shall be subject to the 
     condition that the Township not use any Federal funds to 
     cover--
       (1) any portion of the conveyance costs required by 
     subsection (c) to be paid by the Township; or
       (2) to cover the costs for the design or construction of 
     any facility on the property.
       (e) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
     description of the property to be conveyed under subsection 
     (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
     Secretary.
       (f) Additional Terms.--The Secretary may require such 
     additional terms and conditions in connection with the 
     conveyance under this section as the Secretary considers 
     appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

                       Subtitle F--Other Matters

     SEC. 2861. REPEAL OF ANNUAL ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE 
                   REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

       Subsection (d) of section 4004 of the Defense Economic 
     Adjustment, Diversification, Conversion, and Stabilization 
     Act of 1990 (division D of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2391 
     note), as amended by section 4212(b) of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484; 
     106 Stat. 2664), is further amended--
       (1) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1);
       (2) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (2) and 
     inserting a period; and
       (3) by striking paragraph (3).

     SEC. 2862. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR 
                   SECURITY STUDIES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-
                   PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES.

       (a) Redesignation.--The Department of Defense regional 
     center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center 
     for Security Studies is hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye 
     Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
       (b) Conforming Amendments.--
       (1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies.--
     Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by striking ``Asia-Pacific Center for Security 
     Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific 
     Center for Security Studies''.
       (2) Acceptance of gifts and donations.--Section 
     2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking ``Asia-
     Pacific Center for Security Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel 
     K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
       (c) References.--Any reference to the Department of Defense 
     Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law, 
     regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 
     United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel 
     K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

[[Page 8975]]



     SEC. 2863. REDESIGNATION OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NURSING AT 
                   THE UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH 
                   SCIENCES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE GRADUATE 
                   SCHOOL OF NURSING.

       (a) Redesignation.--The Graduate School of Nursing at the 
     Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences is 
     hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of 
     Nursing''.
       (b) References.--Any reference to the Graduate School of 
     Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health 
     Sciences in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
     other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a 
     reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing.

     SEC. 2864. RENAMING SITE OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE 
                   NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, OHIO.

       Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
     Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended 
     by striking ``Aviation Center'' and inserting ``National 
     Museum''.

     SEC. 2865. DESIGNATION OF DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS NATIONAL 
                   MEMORIAL IN RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The most reliable statistics regarding the number of 
     members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the 
     Distinguished Flying Cross indicate that 126,318 members of 
     the Armed Forces received the medal during World War II, 
     approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the 
     Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during 
     the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than 
     203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of 
     conflict.
       (2) The National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, 
     Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus many more recipients 
     of the Distinguished Flying Cross may be undocumented. 
     Currently, the Department of Defense continues to locate and 
     identify members of the Armed Forces who have received the 
     medal and are undocumented.
       (3) The United States currently lacks a national memorial 
     dedicated to the bravery and sacrifice of those members of 
     the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves by heroic 
     deeds performed in aerial flight.
       (4) An appropriate memorial to current and former members 
     of the Armed Forces is under construction at March Field Air 
     Museum in Riverside, California.
       (5) This memorial will honor all those members of the Armed 
     Forces who have distinguished themselves in aerial flight, 
     whether documentation of such members who earned the 
     Distinguished Flying Cross exists or not.
       (b) Designation.--The memorial to members of the Armed 
     Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, 
     located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, 
     is hereby designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross 
     National Memorial.
       (c) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial 
     designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park 
     System, and the designation of the national memorial shall 
     not be construed to require or permit Federal funds to be 
     expended for any purpose related to the national memorial.

   TITLE XXIX--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 2901. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
                   PROJECT.

       (a) Outside the United States.--The Secretary of the Army 
     may acquire real property and carry out the military 
     construction project for the installation outside the United 
     States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

                                         Army: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Country                                        Installation                       Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuba...........................................  Guantanamo Bay.................................    $247,400,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       (b) Use of Unobligated Prior-year Military Construction 
     Funds.--To carry out the military construction project set 
     forth in the table in subsection (a), the Secretary of 
     Defense may make available to the Secretary of the Army 
     available, unobligated military construction funds 
     appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2014.
       (c) Congressional Notification.--The Secretary of the Army 
     shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) 
     of title 10, United States Code, regarding the military 
     construction project set forth in the table in subsection 
     (a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated project 
     cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by 
     section 2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and 
     scope of work variations.
       (d) Briefing on Infrastructure to Support Joint Task Force, 
     Guantanamo.--
       (1) Briefing required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     brief the congressional defense committees on each of the 
     following:
       (A) A description of each of the following costs, broken 
     down by fiscal year, for each of fiscal years 2002 through 
     2013:
       (i) The costs of constructing the permanent and temporary 
     infrastructure to support the detention operations at such 
     Naval Station.
       (ii) The costs of facility repair, sustainment, 
     maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure supporting 
     the detention operations at such Naval Station.
       (iii) The costs of military personnel, civilian personnel, 
     and contractors associated with the detention operations at 
     such Naval Station.
       (iv) The costs of operation and maintenance, shown for each 
     military department and account, associated with carrying out 
     military commissions for individuals detained at such Naval 
     Station.
       (v) The costs associated with the Office of the Deputy 
     Assistant Secretary of Defense (Rule of Law and Detainee 
     Policy), the Periodic Review Services, and studies and task 
     forces funded by the Department of Defense that relate to the 
     detention operations at such Naval Station.
       (vi) Any other costs associated with supporting the 
     detention operations at such Naval Station.
       (B) A master plan for the continuation of detention 
     operations by Joint Task Force Guantanamo, at United States 
     Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, during the time period 
     beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 
     on the date of the 66th birthday of the youngest individual 
     who is detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 
     Bay, Cuba, on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
     including--
       (i) a description of any infrastructure projects that the 
     Secretary determines are required for the continuation of 
     such detention operations, including new requirements and 
     replacement of existing infrastructure;
       (ii) an estimate of the total military personnel, civilian 
     personnel, and contractor costs associated with the 
     continuation of such detention operations;
       (iii) an estimate of the total operation and maintenance 
     costs associated with the continuation of such detention 
     operations;
       (iv) an estimate of the total costs associated with 
     carrying out military commissions for individuals detained at 
     such Naval Station; and
       (v) an estimate of any other costs associated with the 
     continuation of such detention operations.
       (C) A cost estimate, itemized by construction project, of 
     the infrastructure investments identified in the master plan 
     described in subparagraph (B).
       (D) A detailed estimate of the annual costs projected to 
     repair, sustain, and maintain the facilities that are in use 
     by Joint Task Force, Guantanamo, as of the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, or are identified in the master plan 
     described in subparagraph (B).
       (2) Presidential plan.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees a plan describing 
     each of the following:
       (A) The locations to which the President seeks to transfer 
     individuals detained at Guantanamo who have been identified 
     for continued detention or prosecution.
       (B) The individuals detained at Guantanamo who the 
     President seeks to transfer to overseas locations, the 
     overseas locations to which the President seeks to transfer 
     such individuals, and the conditions under which the 
     President would transfer such individuals to such locations.
       (C) The proposal of the President for the detention and 
     treatment of individuals captured overseas in the future who 
     are suspected of being terrorists.
       (D) The proposal of the President regarding the disposition 
     of the individuals detained at the detention facility at 
     Parwan, Afghanistan, who have been identified as enduring 
     security threats to the United States.
       (E) For any location in the United States to which the 
     President seeks to transfer such an individual, estimates of 
     each of the following costs:
       (i) The costs of constructing infrastructure to support 
     detention operations or prosecution at such location.
       (ii) The costs of facility repair, sustainment, 
     maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure supporting 
     detention operations or prosecution at such location.
       (iii) The costs of military personnel, civilian personnel, 
     and contractors associated with the detention operations or 
     prosecution at such location, including any costs likely to 
     be incurred by other Federal departments or agencies or State 
     or local governments.
       (iv) Any other costs associated with supporting the 
     detention operations or prosecution at such location.

TITLE XXX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT READINESS 
                              AND SECURITY

           Subtitle A--Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana

     SEC. 3001. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LANDS FOR 
                   LIMESTONE HILLS TRAINING AREA, MONTANA.

       (a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights and 
     except as provided in this subtitle,

[[Page 8976]]

     the public lands and interests in lands described in 
     subsection (c), and all other areas within the boundaries of 
     such lands as depicted on the map provided for by subsection 
     (d) that may become subject to the operation of the public 
     land laws, are hereby withdrawn from all forms of 
     appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing 
     laws.
       (b) Reservation; Purpose.--Subject to the limitations and 
     restrictions contained in section 3003, the public lands 
     withdrawn by subsection (a) are reserved for use by the 
     Secretary of the Army for the following purposes:
       (1) The conduct of training for active and reserve 
     components of the Armed Forces.
       (2) The construction, operation, and maintenance of 
     organizational support and maintenance facilities for 
     component units conducting training.
       (3) The conduct of training by the Montana Department of 
     Military Affairs, except that any such use may not interfere 
     with purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2).
       (4) The conduct of training by State and local law 
     enforcement agencies, civil defense organizations, and public 
     education institutions, except that any such use may not 
     interfere with military training activities.
       (5) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the 
     purposes specified in the preceding paragraphs.
       (c) Land Description.--The public lands and interests in 
     lands withdrawn and reserved by this section comprise 
     approximately 18,644 acres in Broadwater County, Montana, as 
     generally depicted as ``Proposed Land Withdrawal'' on the map 
     titled ``Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal'', 
     dated April 10, 2013.
       (d) Legal Description and Map.--
       (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
     shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description of 
     the public land withdrawn under subsection (a) and a copy of 
     a map depicting the legal description of the withdrawn land.
       (2) Force of law.--The legal description and map published 
     under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as 
     if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the 
     Interior may correct errors in the legal description.
       (3) Reimbursement of costs.--The Secretary of the Army 
     shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs 
     incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in implementing 
     this subsection.
       (e) Indian Tribes.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed as altering any rights reserved for an Indian tribe 
     for tribal use of lands within the military land withdrawal 
     by treaty or Federal law. The Secretary of the Army shall 
     consult with any Indian tribes in the vicinity of the 
     military land withdrawal before taking action within the 
     military land withdrawal affecting tribal rights or cultural 
     resources protected by treaty or Federal law.

     SEC. 3002. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LANDS.

       During the period of the withdrawal and reservation 
     specified in section 3005, the Secretary of the Army shall 
     manage the public lands withdrawn by section 3001 for the 
     purposes specified in subsection (b) of such section, subject 
     to the limitations and restrictions contained in section 
     3003.

     SEC. 3003. SPECIAL RULES GOVERNING MINERALS MANAGEMENT.

       (a) Indian Creek Mine.--
       (1) In general.--Of the lands withdrawn by section 3001, 
     locatable mineral activities in the approved Indian Creek 
     Mine plan of operations, MTM-78300, shall be regulated 
     pursuant to subparts 3715 and 3809 of title 43, Code of 
     Federal Regulations. Of the lands withdrawn by section 3001, 
     the land area subject to the approved plan of operations 
     shall permanently remain open to the amendment or relocation 
     of mining claims (or both) under the Act of May 10, 1872 
     (commonly known as the General Mining Act of 1872; 30 U.S.C. 
     22 et seq.) to the extent necessary to preserve the mining 
     operations described in the approved plan of operations.
       (2) Restrictions on secretary of the army.--The Secretary 
     of the Army shall make no determination that the disposition 
     of or exploration for minerals as provided for in the 
     approved plan of operations is inconsistent with the defense-
     related uses of the lands covered by the military land 
     withdrawal. The coordination of such disposition of and 
     exploration for minerals with defense-related uses of such 
     lands shall be determined pursuant to procedures in an 
     agreement provided for under subsection (c).
       (b) Removal of Unexploded Ordnance on Lands To Be Mined.--
       (1) Removal activities.--Subject to the availability of 
     funds appropriated for such purpose, the Secretary of the 
     Army shall remove unexploded ordnance on lands withdrawn by 
     section 3001 that are subject to mining under subsection (a), 
     consistent with applicable Federal and State law. The 
     Secretary of the Army may engage in such removal of 
     unexploded ordnance in phases to accommodate the development 
     of the Indian Creek Mine pursuant to subsection (a).
       (2) Report on removal activities.--The Secretary of the 
     Army shall annually submit to the Secretary of the Interior a 
     report regarding the unexploded ordnance removal activities 
     for the previous fiscal year performed pursuant to this 
     subsection. The report shall include--
       (A) the amounts of funding expended for unexploded ordnance 
     removal on the lands withdrawn by section 3001; and
       (B) the identification of the lands cleared of unexploded 
     ordnance and approved for mining activities by the Secretary 
     of the Interior.
       (c) Implementation Agreement for Mining Activities.--The 
     Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall 
     enter into an agreement to implement this section with regard 
     to coordination of defense-related uses and mining and the 
     ongoing removal of unexploded ordnance. The duration of the 
     agreement shall be the same as the period of the withdrawal 
     under section 3001, but may be amended from time to time. The 
     agreement shall provide the following:
       (1) That Graymont Western US, Inc., or any successor or 
     assign of the approved Indian Creek Mine mining plan of 
     operations, MTM-78300, is invited to be a party to the 
     agreement.
       (2) Provisions regarding the day-to-day joint-use of the 
     Limestone Hills Training Area.
       (3) Provisions addressing when military and other 
     authorized uses of the withdrawn lands will occur.
       (4) Provisions regarding when and where military use or 
     training with explosive material will occur.
       (5) Provisions regarding the scheduling of training 
     activities conducted within the withdrawn area that restrict 
     mining activities and procedures for deconfliction with 
     mining operations, including parameters for notification and 
     sanction of anticipated changes to the schedule.
       (6) Provisions regarding liability and compensation for 
     damages or injury caused by mining or military training 
     activities.
       (7) Provisions for periodic review of the agreement for its 
     adequacy, effectiveness, and need for revision.
       (8) Procedures for access through mining operations covered 
     by this section to training areas within the boundaries of 
     the Limestone Hills Training Area.
       (9) Procedures for scheduling of the removal of unexploded 
     ordnance.
       (d) Existing Memorandum of Agreement.--Until such time as 
     the agreement required under subsection (c) becomes 
     effective, the compatible joint use of the lands withdrawn 
     and reserved by section 3001 shall be governed, to the extent 
     compatible, by the terms of the 2005 Memorandum of Agreement 
     among the Montana Army National Guard, Graymont Western US 
     Inc. and the Bureau of Land Management.

     SEC. 3004. GRAZING.

       (a) Issuance and Administration of Permits and Leases.--The 
     issuance and administration of grazing permits and leases, 
     including their renewal, on the public lands withdrawn by 
     section 3001 shall be managed by the Secretary of the 
     Interior consistent with all applicable laws, regulations, 
     and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to 
     such permits and leases.
       (b) Safety Requirements.--With respect to any grazing 
     permit or lease issued after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act for lands withdrawn by section 3001, the Secretary 
     of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly 
     establish procedures that are consistent with Department of 
     the Army explosive and range safety standards and that 
     provide for the safe use of any such lands.
       (c) Assignment.--The Secretary of the Interior may, with 
     the agreement of the Secretary of the Army, assign the 
     authority to issue and to administer grazing permits and 
     leases to the Secretary of the Army, except that such an 
     assignment may not include the authority to discontinue 
     grazing on the lands withdrawn by section 3001.

     SEC. 3005. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.

       The military land withdrawal made by section 3001 shall 
     terminate on March 31, 2039.

     SEC. 3006. PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES.

       The lands withdrawn by section 3001 shall remain eligible 
     as entitlement land under section 6901 of title 31, United 
     States Code.

     SEC. 3007. HUNTING, FISHING AND TRAPPING.

       All hunting, fishing and trapping on the lands withdrawn by 
     section 3001 shall be conducted in accordance with section 
     2671 of title 10, United States Code.

     SEC. 3008. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     withdrawn by section 3001; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     withdrawn by section 3001, except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 3009. BRUSH AND RANGE FIRE PREVENTION AND SUPPRESSION.

       (a) Required Activities.--The Secretary of the Army shall, 
     consistent with any applicable land management plan, take 
     necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, 
     brush and range fires occurring as a result of military 
     activities on the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 
     3001, including fires outside those lands that spread from 
     the withdrawn land and which occurred as a result of such 
     activities.
       (b) Cooperation of Secretary of the Interior.--At the 
     request of the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the 
     Interior shall provide assistance in the suppression of such 
     fires and shall be reimbursed for such assistance by the 
     Secretary of the Army. Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 
     10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may 
     transfer to the Secretary

[[Page 8977]]

     of the Interior, in advance, funds to reimburse the costs of 
     the Department of the Interior in providing such assistance.

     SEC. 3010. ON-GOING DECONTAMINATION.

       During the withdrawal and reservation authorized by section 
     3001, the Secretary of the Army shall maintain, to the extent 
     funds are available for such purpose, a program of 
     decontamination of contamination caused by defense-related 
     uses on such lands consistent with applicable Federal and 
     State law. The Secretary of Defense shall include a 
     description of such decontamination activities in the annual 
     report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States 
     Code.

     SEC. 3011. APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A WITHDRAWAL AND 
                   RESERVATION.

       (a) Notice.--To the extent practicable, no later than five 
     years before the termination of the withdrawal and 
     reservation made by section 3001, the Secretary of the Army 
     shall notify the Secretary of the Interior whether the 
     Secretary of the Army will have a continuing defense-related 
     need for any of the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 
     3001 after the termination date of such withdrawal and 
     reservation. The Secretary of the Army shall provide a copy 
     of the notice to the Committee on Armed Services and the 
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Natural 
     Resources of the House of Representatives.
       (b) Filing for Extension.--If the Secretary of the Army 
     concludes that there will be a continuing defense-related 
     need for any of the withdrawn and reserved lands after the 
     termination date, the Secretary of the Army shall file an 
     application for extension of the withdrawal and reservation 
     of such needed lands in accordance with the regulations and 
     procedures of the Department of the Interior applicable to 
     the extension of withdrawals and reservations.

     SEC. 3012. LIMITATION ON SUBSEQUENT AVAILABILITY OF LANDS FOR 
                   APPROPRIATION.

       At the time of termination of a withdrawal and reservation 
     made by section 3001, the previously withdrawn lands shall 
     not be open to any form of appropriation under the public 
     land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing 
     and geothermal leasing laws, until the Secretary of the 
     Interior publishes in the Federal Register an appropriate 
     order specifying the date upon which such lands shall be 
     restored to the public domain and opened for such purposes.

     SEC. 3013. RELINQUISHMENT.

       (a) Notice of Intention to Relinquish.--If, during the 
     period of withdrawal and reservation under section 3001, the 
     Secretary of the Army decides to relinquish any or all of the 
     lands withdrawn and reserved, the Secretary of the Army shall 
     file a notice of intention to relinquish with the Secretary 
     of the Interior.
       (b) Determination of Contamination.--As a part of the 
     notice under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall 
     include a written determination concerning whether and to 
     what extent the lands that are to be relinquished are 
     contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous 
     substances.
       (c) Public Notice.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
     publish in the Federal Register the notice of intention to 
     relinquish, including the determination concerning the 
     contaminated state of the lands.
       (d) Decontamination of Lands to Be Relinquished.--
       (1) Conditions requiring decontamination.--If land subject 
     of a notice of intention to relinquish pursuant to subsection 
     (a) is contaminated, and the Secretary of the Interior, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of the Army, determines that 
     decontamination is practicable and economically feasible 
     (taking into consideration the potential future use and value 
     of the land) and that, upon decontamination, the land could 
     be opened to operation of some or all of the public land 
     laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and 
     geothermal leasing laws, the Secretary of the Army shall 
     decontaminate the land to the extent that funds are 
     appropriated for such purpose.
       (2) Discretion if conditions not met.--If the Secretary of 
     the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary of the 
     Army, concludes that decontamination of land subject of a 
     notice of intention to relinquish pursuant to subsection (a) 
     is not practicable or economically feasible, or that the land 
     cannot be decontaminated sufficiently to be opened to 
     operation of some or all of the public land laws, or if 
     Congress does not appropriate sufficient funds for the 
     decontamination of such land, the Secretary of the Interior 
     shall not be required to accept the land proposed for 
     relinquishment.
       (3) Response.--If the Secretary of the Interior declines to 
     accept the lands that have been proposed for relinquishment 
     because of their contaminated state, or if at the expiration 
     of the withdrawal and reservation made by section 3001 the 
     Secretary of the Interior determines that some of the lands 
     withdrawn and reserved are contaminated to an extent which 
     prevents opening such contaminated lands to operation of the 
     public land laws--
       (A) the Secretary of the Army shall take appropriate steps 
     to warn the public of the contaminated state of such lands 
     and any risks associated with entry onto such lands;
       (B) after the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation, 
     the Secretary of the Army shall undertake no activities on 
     such lands except in connection with decontamination of such 
     lands; and
       (C) the Secretary of the Army shall report to the Secretary 
     of the Interior and to the Congress concerning the status of 
     such lands and all actions taken in furtherance of this 
     paragraph.
       (e) Revocation Authority.--Upon deciding that it is in the 
     public interest to accept the lands proposed for 
     relinquishment pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of 
     the Interior may order the revocation of the withdrawal and 
     reservation made by section 3001 as it applies to such lands. 
     The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal 
     Register the revocation order, which shall--
       (1) terminate the withdrawal and reservation;
       (2) constitute official acceptance of the lands by the 
     Secretary of the Interior; and
       (3) state the date upon which the lands will be opened to 
     the operation of some or all of the public land laws, 
     including the mining laws.
       (f) Acceptance by Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in 
     this section shall be construed to require the Secretary of 
     the Interior to accept the lands proposed for relinquishment 
     if the Secretary determines that such lands are not suitable 
     for return to the public domain. If the Secretary makes such 
     a determination, the Secretary shall provide notice of the 
     determination to Congress.

           Subtitle B--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

     SEC. 3021. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, WHITE 
                   SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO.

       (a) Transfer Required.--Not later than September 30, 2014, 
     the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army 
     certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land 
     Management in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, consisting of 
     approximately 5,100 acres depicted as ``Parcel 1'' on the map 
     titled ``White Sands Missile Range Land Reservation'' and 
     dated January 4, 2013.
       (b) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall include 
     the land as part of White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, 
     and authorize use of the land for military purposes.
       (c) Legal Description and Map.--
       (1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the 
     Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal 
     description and map of the public land to be transferred 
     under subsection (a).
       (2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed 
     under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as 
     if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the 
     Interior may correct errors in the legal description.
       (d) Reimbursement of Costs.--The transfer required by 
     subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except 
     that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary 
     of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of 
     the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under 
     subsection (c).
       (e) Treatment of Grazing Leases.--If a grazing permit or 
     lease exists on the date of the enactment of this Act for any 
     portion of the public land to be transferred under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer or relocate 
     the grazing allotments associated with the permit or lease to 
     other public land, acceptable to the permit or lease holder, 
     so that the grazing continues to have the same value to the 
     holder.

     SEC. 3022. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 3023. WITHDRAWAL.

       Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be 
     transferred under section 3021 is withdrawn from all forms of 
     appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the lands 
     remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary 
     of the Army.

      Subtitle C--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

     SEC. 3031. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, NAVAL AIR 
                   WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Transfer Required.--Not later than September 30, 2014, 
     the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy 
     certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land 
     Management in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, 
     California, consisting of approximately 1,045,000 acres in 
     Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, as 
     generally depicted on the map titled ``Naval Air Weapons 
     Station China Lake Withdrawal - Renewal'' and dated 2012.
       (b) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall include 
     the land as part of the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, 
     California, and authorize use of the land for military 
     purposes.
       (c) Legal Description and Map.--
       (1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the 
     Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal 
     description and map of the

[[Page 8978]]

     public land to be transferred under subsection (a).
       (2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed 
     under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as 
     if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the 
     Interior may correct errors in the legal description and map.
       (d) Reimbursement of Costs.--The transfer required by 
     subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except 
     that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary 
     of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of 
     the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under 
     subsection (c).

     SEC. 3032. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 3033. WITHDRAWAL.

       Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be 
     transferred under section 3031 is withdrawn from all forms of 
     appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the lands 
     remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary 
     of the Navy.

    Subtitle D--Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California

     SEC. 3041. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, CHOCOLATE 
                   MOUNTAIN AERIAL GUNNERY RANGE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Transfer Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
     transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary 
     of the Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of 
     Land Management in Imperial and Riverside Counties, 
     California, consisting of approximately 226,711 acres, as 
     generally depicted on the map titled ``Chocolate Mountain 
     Aerial Gunnery Range Proposed-Withdrawal'' dated 1987 
     (revised July 1993), and identified as WESTDIV Drawing No. C-
     102370, which was prepared by the Naval Facilities 
     Engineering Command of the Department of the Navy and is on 
     file with the California State Office of the Bureau of Land 
     Management.
       (b) Valid Existing Rights.--The transfer of administrative 
     jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any 
     valid existing rights, including any property, easements, or 
     improvements held by the Bureau of Reclamation and 
     appurtenant to the Coachella Canal. The Secretary of the Navy 
     shall provide for reasonable access by the Bureau of 
     Reclamation for inspection and maintenance purposes not 
     inconsistent with military training.
       (c) Time for Conveyance.--The transfer of administrative 
     jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a 
     schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the 
     Secretary of the Navy, but in no case later than the date of 
     the completion of the boundary realignment required by 
     section 3043.
       (d) Map and Legal Description.--
       (1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the 
     Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal 
     description of the public land to be transferred under 
     subsection (a).
       (2) Submission to congress.--The Secretary of the Interior 
     shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 
     of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
     House of Representatives--
       (A) a copy of the legal description prepared under 
     paragraph (1); and
       (B) a map depicting the legal description of the 
     transferred public land.
       (3) Availability for public inspection.--Copies of the 
     legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be 
     available for public inspection in the appropriate offices 
     of--
       (A) the Bureau of Land Management;
       (B) the Office of the Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air 
     Station Yuma, Arizona;
       (C) the Office of the Commander, Navy Region Southwest; and
       (D) the Office of the Secretary of the Navy.
       (4) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed 
     under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as 
     if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the 
     Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the 
     legal description or map.
       (5) Reimbursement of costs.--The transfer required by 
     subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except 
     that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary 
     of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of 
     the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under 
     this subsection.

     SEC. 3042. MANAGEMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND.

       (a) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land 
     under section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall 
     administer the land as the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery 
     Range, California, and continue to authorize use of the land 
     for military purposes.
       (b) Protection of Desert Tortoise.--Nothing in the transfer 
     required by section 3041 shall affect the prior designation 
     of certain lands within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery 
     Range as critical habitat for the desert tortoise (Gopherus 
     Agassizii).
       (c) Withdrawal of Mineral Estate.--Subject to valid 
     existing rights, the mineral estate of the land to be 
     transferred under section 3041 are withdrawn from all forms 
     of appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws and the mineral and geothermal leasing laws, for 
     as long as the land is under the administrative jurisdiction 
     of the Secretary of the Navy.
       (d) Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan.--Not 
     later than one year after the transfer of the land under 
     section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy, in cooperation with 
     the Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated 
     natural resources management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act 
     (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.) for the transferred land and for 
     land that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is 
     under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy 
     underlying the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range.

     SEC. 3043. REALIGNMENT OF RANGE BOUNDARY AND RELATED TRANSFER 
                   OF TITLE.

       (a) Realignment; Purpose.--The Secretary of the Interior 
     and the Secretary of the Navy shall realign the boundary of 
     the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, as in effect on 
     the date of the enactment of this Act, to improve public 
     safety and management of the Range, consistent with the 
     following:
       (1) The northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain 
     Aerial Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the 
     Bradshaw Trail so that the Trail is entirely on public land 
     under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior.
       (2) The centerline of the Bradshaw Trail shall be 
     delineated by the Secretary of the Interior in consultation 
     with the Secretary of the Navy, beginning at its western 
     terminus at Township 8 South, Range 12 East, Section 6 
     eastward to Township 8 South, Range 17 East, Section 32 where 
     it leaves the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range.
       (b) Transfers Related to Realignment.--The Secretary of the 
     Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall make such 
     transfers of administrative jurisdiction as may be necessary 
     to reflect the results of the boundary realignment carried 
     out pursuant to subsection (a).
       (c) Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act of 
     1969.--The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
     U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer of land 
     made under subsection (b) or any decontamination actions 
     undertaken in connection with such a transfer.
       (d) Decontamination.--The Secretary of the Navy shall 
     maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose 
     and consistent with applicable Federal and State law, a 
     program of decontamination of any contamination caused by 
     defense-related uses on land transferred under subsection 
     (b). The Secretary of Defense shall include a description of 
     such decontamination activities in the annual report required 
     by section 2711 of title 10, United States Code.
       (e) Timeline.--The delineation of the Bradshaw Trail under 
     subsection (a) and any transfer of land under subsection (b) 
     shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary 
     of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case 
     later than two years after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act.

     SEC. 3044. EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF MILITARY USE.

       (a) Notice and Effect.--Upon a determination by the 
     Secretary of the Navy that there is no longer a military need 
     for all or portions of the land transferred under section 
     3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall notify the Secretary of 
     the Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections 
     (b), (c), and (d), the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer 
     the land subject to such a notice back to the administrative 
     jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.
       (b) Contamination.--Before transmitting a notice under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall prepare a 
     written determination concerning whether and to what extent 
     the land to be transferred are contaminated with explosive, 
     toxic, or other hazardous materials. A copy of the 
     determination shall be transmitted with the notice. Copies of 
     the notice and the determination shall be published in the 
     Federal Register.
       (c) Decontamination.--The Secretary of the Navy shall 
     decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a 
     notice under subsection (a) if--
       (1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of the Navy, determines that--
       (A) decontamination is practicable and economically 
     feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use 
     and value of the land); and
       (B) upon decontamination, the land could be opened to 
     operation of some or all of the public land laws, including 
     the mining laws; and
       (2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination.
       (d) Alternative.--The Secretary of the Interior is not 
     required to accept land proposed for transfer under 
     subsection (a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to 
     make the determinations under subsection (c)(1) or if 
     Congress does not appropriate a sufficient amount of funds 
     for the decontamination of the land.

     SEC. 3045. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXISTING WITHDRAWAL PERIOD.

       Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the 
     California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 
     1994 (title VIII of Public Law 103-433; 108 Stat. 4505), the 
     withdrawal and reservation of the land transferred under 
     section 3041 shall not terminate until the date on which the 
     land transfer required by section 3041 is executed.

[[Page 8979]]



     SEC. 3046. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

  Subtitle E--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, 
                               California

     SEC. 3051. DESIGNATION OF JOHNSON VALLEY NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY 
                   VEHICLE RECREATION AREA.

       (a) Designation.--The approximately 188,000 acres of public 
     land and interests in land administered by the Secretary of 
     the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management in San 
     Bernardino County, California, as generally depicted as the 
     ``Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area'' on the 
     map titled ``Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle 
     Recreation Area and Transfer of the Southern Study Area'' and 
     dated April 11, 2013, are hereby designated as the ``Johnson 
     Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area''.
       (b) Recreational and Conservation Use.--The Johnson Valley 
     National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area is designated 
     for the following purposes:
       (1) Public recreation (including off-highway vehicle use, 
     camping, and hiking) when the lands are not used for military 
     training as authorized by section 3052.
       (2) Natural resources conservation.
       (c) Withdrawal.--The public land and interests in land 
     included in the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle 
     Recreation Area are hereby withdrawn from all forms of 
     appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing 
     laws.
       (d) Treatment of Existing Rights.--The designation of the 
     Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 
     and the withdrawal of the public land and interests in land 
     included in the Recreation Area are subject to valid existing 
     rights.

     SEC. 3052. LIMITED BIANNUAL MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT 
                   CENTER TWENTYNINE PALMS USE OF JOHNSON VALLEY 
                   NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION AREA.

       (a) Use for Military Purposes Authorized.--Subject to 
     subsection (b), the Secretary of the Interior shall authorize 
     the Secretary of the Navy to utilize portions of Johnson 
     Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area twice in 
     each calendar year for up to a total of 60 days per year for 
     the following purposes:
       (1) Sustained, combined arms, live-fire, and maneuver field 
     training for large-scale Marine air-ground task forces.
       (2) Individual and unit live-fire training ranges.
       (3) Equipment and tactics development.
       (4) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the 
     purposes specified in the preceding paragraphs.
       (b) Conditions on Military Use.--
       (1) Consultation and public participation requirements.--
     Before the Secretary of the Navy requests the two time 
     periods for military use of the Johnson Valley National Off-
     Highway Vehicle Recreation Area in a calendar year, the 
     Secretary of the Navy shall--
       (A) consult with the Secretary of the Interior regarding 
     the best times for military use to reduce interference with 
     or interruption of nonmilitary activities authorized by 
     section 3051(b); and
       (B) provide for public awareness of and participation in 
     the selection process.
       (2) Public notice.--The Secretary of the Navy shall provide 
     advance, wide-spread notice before any closure of public 
     lands for military use under this section.
       (3) Public safety.--Military use of the Johnson Valley 
     National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area during the 
     biannual periods authorized by subsection (a) shall be 
     conducted in the presence of sufficient range safety officers 
     to ensure the safety of military personnel and civilians.
       (4) Certain types of ordnance prohibited.--The Secretary of 
     the Navy shall prohibit the use of dud-producing ordnance in 
     any military training conducted under subsection (a).
       (c) Implementing Agreement.--
       (1) Agreement required; required terms.--The Secretary of 
     the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into a 
     written agreement to implement this section. The agreement 
     shall include a provision for periodic review of the 
     agreement for its adequacy, effectiveness, and need for 
     revision.
       (2) Additional terms.--The agreement may provide for--
       (A) the integration of the management plans of the 
     Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy;
       (B) delegation to civilian law enforcement personnel of the 
     Department of the Navy of the authority of the Secretary of 
     the Interior to enforce the laws relating to protection of 
     natural and cultural resources and of fish and wildlife; and
       (C) the sharing of resources in order to most efficiently 
     and effectively manage the lands.
       (d) Duration.--Any agreement for the military use of the 
     Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 
     shall terminate not later than March 31, 2039.

     SEC. 3053. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, SOUTHERN 
                   STUDY AREA, MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT 
                   CENTER TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Transfer Required.--Not later than September 30, 2014, 
     the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer, without 
     reimbursement, to the administrative jurisdiction of the 
     Secretary of the Navy certain public land administered by the 
     Bureau of Land Management consisting of approximately 20,000 
     acres in San Bernardino County, California, as generally 
     depicted as the ``Southern Study Area'' on the map referred 
     to in section 3051.
       (b) Use of Transferred Land.--Upon the receipt of the land 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall include 
     the land as part of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center 
     Twentynine Palms, California, and authorize use of the land 
     for military purposes.
       (c) Legal Description and Map.--
       (1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the 
     Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal 
     description and map of the public land to be transferred 
     under subsection (a).
       (2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed 
     under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as 
     if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the 
     Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the 
     legal description and map.
       (d) Reimbursement of Costs.--The Secretary of the Navy 
     shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs 
     incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this 
     section.

     SEC. 3054. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

              Subtitle F--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

     SEC. 3061. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, NAVAL AIR 
                   STATION FALLON, NEVADA.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
     transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration, 
     the Federal land described in subsection (b).
       (b) Description of Federal Land.--The Federal land referred 
     to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres 
     of land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 
     Interior that--
       (1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill 
     County, Nevada; and
       (2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV-943-
     4214-10; N-37875).
       (c) Management.--On transfer of the Federal land described 
     under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the 
     Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdiction, custody, 
     and control of the Federal land.

     SEC. 3062. WATER RIGHTS.

       (a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be 
     construed--
       (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United 
     States with respect to any water or water right on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle; or
       (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands 
     transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with 
     applicable State law.
       (b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water 
     Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any 
     water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before 
     the date of the enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 3063. WITHDRAWAL.

       Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land to be 
     transferred under section 3061 is withdrawn from all forms of 
     appropriation under the public land laws, including the 
     mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the land 
     remains under the administrative jurisdiction of the 
     Secretary of the Navy.

 DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND 
                          OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

      TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

         Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

     SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby 
     authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for 
     fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear 
     Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified 
     in the funding table in section 4701.
       (b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds 
     referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying 
     out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new 
     plant projects for the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration as follows:
       Project 14-D-710, Device Assembly Facility Argus 
     Installation Project, Nevada National Security Site, Las 
     Vegas, Nevada, $14,000,000
       Project 14-D-901, Spent Fueling Handling Recapitalization 
     Project, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $45,400,000.

[[Page 8980]]

       Project 14-D-902, KL Materials Characterization Laboratory, 
     Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, 
     $1,000,000.

     SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
     Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense 
     environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4701.

     SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
     Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense 
     activities in carrying out programs as specified in the 
     funding table in section 4701.

     SEC. 3104. ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE.

        Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the 
     Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for energy security 
     and assurance programs necessary for national security as 
     specified in the funding table in section 4701.

   Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

     SEC. 3111. CLARIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR 
                   SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

       Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear 
     Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to 
     read as follows:
       ``(c) Operations and Activities to Be Carried Out 
     Consistent With Certain Principles.--In carrying out the 
     mission of the Administration, the Administrator shall ensure 
     that all operations and activities of the Administration are 
     consistent with the principles of--
       ``(1) protecting the environment;
       ``(2) safeguarding the safety and health of the public and 
     of the workforce of the Administration; and
       ``(3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons, nuclear 
     material, and classified information in the custody of the 
     Administration.''.

     SEC. 3112. TERMINATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EMPLOYEES TO 
                   PROTECT NATIONAL SECURITY.

       (a) In General.--Subtitle C of the National Nuclear 
     Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441 et seq.) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 3245. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES TO PROTECT NATIONAL 
                   SECURITY.

       ``(a) Termination Authority.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary of Energy may terminate an 
     employee of the Administration or any element of the 
     Department of Energy that involves nuclear security if the 
     Secretary--
       ``(1) determines that the employee acted in a manner that 
     endangers the security of special nuclear material or 
     classified information;
       ``(2) considers the termination to be in the interests of 
     the United States; and
       ``(3) determines that the procedures prescribed in other 
     provisions of law that authorize the termination of the 
     employment of such employee cannot be invoked in a manner 
     that the Secretary considers consistent with national 
     security.
       ``(b) Statements and Affidavits.--(1) To the extent that 
     the Secretary determines that the interests of national 
     security permit, the Secretary shall notify an employee whose 
     employment is terminated under this section of the reasons 
     for the termination.
       ``(2) During the 30-day period beginning on the date on 
     which a terminated employee is notified under paragraph (1), 
     the employee may submit to the Secretary statements or 
     affidavits to show why the employee should be restored to 
     duty.
       ``(3) If a terminated employee submits statements and 
     affidavits under paragraph (2), the Secretary--
       ``(A) shall provide a written response to the employee; and
       ``(B) may restore the employment of the employee.
       ``(c) Finality.--A decision by the Secretary to terminate 
     the employment of an employee under this section is final and 
     may not be appealed or reviewed outside the Department.
       ``(d) Notification to Congressional Committees.--Whenever 
     the Secretary terminates the employment of an employee under 
     the authority of this section, the Secretary shall promptly 
     notify the congressional defense committees of such 
     termination.
       ``(e) Preservation of Right to Seek Other Employment.--Any 
     termination of employment under this section does not affect 
     the right of the employee involved to seek or accept 
     employment with any other department or agency of the United 
     States if that employee is declared eligible for such 
     employment by the Director of the Office of Personnel 
     Management.
       ``(f) Prohibition on Delegation.--The authority of the 
     Secretary under this section may not be delegated.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the 
     beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item 
     relating to section 3244 the following new item:

``Sec. 3245. Termination of employees to protect national security.''.

     SEC. 3113. MODIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATES ON LIFE 
                   EXTENSION PROGRAMS AND NEW NUCLEAR FACILITIES.

       (a) In General.--Section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2537) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(2), by adding after the period at the 
     end the following: ``Such cost estimates shall be conducted 
     by the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of 
     Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. The Director may 
     delegate carrying out such a cost estimate to another element 
     of the Department of Defense.''; and
       (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows:
       ``(c) Authority for Further Assessments.--(1) In 
     consultation with the Administrator, the Secretary of 
     Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and 
     Program Evaluation, may conduct an independent cost 
     assessment of any initiative or program of the Administration 
     that is estimated to cost more than $500,000,000. The 
     Director may delegate carrying out such a cost estimate to 
     another element of the Department of Defense.
       ``(2) The Secretary, acting through the Administrator, 
     shall request an appropriate official or entity to conduct an 
     independent review of each--
       ``(A) guidance for the analysis of alternatives for each 
     covered system or facility before such analysis is conducted; 
     and
       ``(B) results of such analysis.
       ``(3) The Secretary, acting through the Administrator, 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the 
     Nuclear Weapons Council each independent review conducted 
     under paragraph (2).
       ``(4) In this subsection:
       ``(A) The term `appropriate official or entity' means the 
     following:
       ``(i) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
     Evaluation.
       ``(ii) An organization selected by the Director of Cost 
     Assessment and Program Evaluation.
       ``(iii) The JASON Defense Advisory Panel.
       ``(B) The term `covered system or facility' means the 
     following:
       ``(i) Each nuclear weapon system undergoing life extension 
     at the completion of phase 6.2A, relating to design 
     definition and cost study.
       ``(ii) Each new nuclear facility within the nuclear 
     security enterprise (as defined in section 4002(5) of the 
     Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) that is 
     estimated to cost more than $500,000,000 before such facility 
     achieves critical decision 2 in the acquisition process.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection 
     (a)(2) shall expire on the date that is three years after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act. Effective on the day after 
     such expiration date, subsection (c) of section 4217 of the 
     Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537), as in effect on 
     the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, is 
     hereby revived.
       (c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     Congress encourages the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
     and the Nuclear Weapons Council to follow the results of the 
     analysis of alternatives of a life extension program or a 
     defense nuclear facility construction project when selecting 
     a final option.

     SEC. 3114. PLAN FOR RETRIEVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSITION OF 
                   TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION.

       (a) In General.--Subtitle D of title XLIV of the Atomic 
     Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new section:

     ``SEC. 4445. PLAN FOR RETRIEVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSITION 
                   OF TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR 
                   RESERVATION.

       ``(a) Plan.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of 
     Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 
     comprehensive plan through 2025 for the safe and effective 
     retrieval, treatment, and disposition of nuclear waste 
     contained in the tank farms of Hanford Nuclear Reservation, 
     Richland, Washington.
       ``(b) Matters Included.--The plan under subsection (a) 
     shall include the following:
       ``(1) A list of all requirements, assumptions, and criteria 
     needed to design, construct, and operate the Waste Treatment 
     and Immobilization Plant and any required infrastructure 
     facilities at the Hanford Tank Farms.
       ``(2) A schedule of activities, construction, and 
     operations at the Hanford Tank Farms and Waste Treatment and 
     Immobilization Plant required before 2025 to carry out the 
     safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and disposition of 
     waste in the Hanford Tank Farms.
       ``(3) Actions required to accelerate, to the extent 
     possible, the retrieval and treatment of lower-risk, low-
     activity waste while continuing efforts to accelerate the 
     resolution of technical challenges associated with higher-
     risk, high-activity waste.
       ``(4) A description of how the Secretary will--
       ``(A) provide adequate protection to workers and the public 
     under the plan; and
       ``(B) incorporate into the plan any new science and 
     technical information that was not available before the 
     development of the plan, including new science and technical 
     information not available as of March 2014.
       ``(c) Determinations.--(1) For each requirement, 
     assumption, or criterion identified by the Secretary under 
     subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall include in the plan 
     under subsection (a) a determination regarding whether such 
     requirement, assumption or criterion is finalized and will be 
     used to inform planning, design, construction, and operations 
     of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project.
       ``(2) For each requirement, assumption, or criterion that 
     the Secretary cannot make a finalized determination for under 
     paragraph (1) by the date the plan under subsection (a) is 
     submitted to the congressional defense committees, the 
     Secretary shall--
       ``(A) include in the plan--
       ``(i) a description of the requirement, assumption, or 
     criterion;

[[Page 8981]]

       ``(ii) a list of activities required for the Secretary to 
     make such determination; and
       ``(iii) the date on which the Secretary anticipates making 
     such determination; and
       ``(B) once the Secretary makes the finalized determination 
     with respect to the requirement, assumption, or criterion, 
     submit to such committees notification that the requirement, 
     assumption, or criterion is finalized and will be used to 
     inform the planning, design, construction, and operations of 
     the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project.
       ``(3)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary may 
     authorize a change to a requirement, assumption, or criterion 
     that the Secretary determines as finalized under paragraph 
     (1) or (2)(B).
       ``(B) The Secretary shall make changes to a requirement, 
     assumption, or criterion under subparagraph (A) if the 
     Secretary cannot provide adequate protection without making 
     such changes.
       ``(C) If the Secretary authorizes a change to a 
     requirement, assumption, or criterion under subparagraph (A) 
     or (B) that will have a material effect on any aspect of the 
     schedule or cost of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization 
     Plant project, the Secretary shall promptly notify the 
     congressional defense committees of such change.
       ``(D) The authority of the Secretary under this paragraph 
     may be delegated only to the Deputy Secretary of Energy.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the 
     beginning of the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by 
     inserting after the item relating to section 4444 the 
     following new item:

``Sec. 4445. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank 
              farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.''.

     SEC. 3115. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY 
                   CHAIN RISK.

       (a) In General.--Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic 
     Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:

     ``SEC. 4806. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY 
                   CHAIN RISK.

       ``(a) Authority.--Subject to subsection (b), a covered 
     official may--
       ``(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and
       ``(2) notwithstanding any other provision of law, limit, in 
     whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to 
     the basis for carrying out a covered procurement action.
       ``(b) Determination and Notification.--Before exercising 
     the authority under subsection (a), a covered official 
     shall--
       ``(1) obtain a joint recommendation by the Deputy Secretary 
     of Energy and the Chief Information Officer of the Department 
     of Energy, on the basis of a risk assessment conducted by the 
     Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence of the 
     Department of Energy, that there is a significant supply 
     chain risk to a covered system;
       ``(2) make a determination in writing, with the concurrence 
     of the Deputy Secretary of Energy, that--
       ``(A) carrying out a covered procurement action under 
     subsection (a)(1) is necessary to protect national security 
     by reducing supply chain risk;
       ``(B) less intrusive measures are not reasonably available 
     to reduce such supply chain risk; and
       ``(C) if the covered official plans to limit disclosure of 
     information under subsection (a)(2), the risk to national 
     security that may result from the disclosure of such 
     information is greater than such risk that may result from 
     not disclosing such information; and
       ``(3) submit to the congressional defense committees, the 
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and 
     the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
     Representatives written notification of--
       ``(A) the joint recommendation under paragraph (1), 
     including a summary of the risk assessment by the Office of 
     Intelligence and Counterintelligence that serves as the basis 
     for such joint recommendation;
       ``(B) the determination under paragraph (2), including--
       ``(i) a summary of the basis for such determination; and
       ``(ii) a discussion of the less intrusive measures that 
     were considered under subparagraph (B) of such paragraph and 
     the reason that the official determined such measures to not 
     be reasonably available; and
       ``(C) the information required by section 2304(f)(3) of 
     title 10, United States Code.
       ``(c) Limitation on Disclosure.--If a covered official 
     exercises the authority under subsection (a), the covered 
     official shall--
       ``(1) notify appropriate parties of the covered procurement 
     action and the basis for such action only to the extent 
     necessary to carry out the covered procurement action;
       ``(2) notify other elements of the Department of Energy or 
     other departments or agencies of the United States that are 
     responsible for procurement that may be subject to the same 
     or similar supply chain risk of the covered procurement 
     action, consistent with the requirements of national 
     security; and
       ``(3) ensure the confidentiality of any notification made 
     under paragraph (1) or (2).
       ``(d) Delegation.--A covered official may not delegate the 
     authority provided under this section to an official of the 
     Department of Energy below the level of the Deputy Assistant 
     Secretary of Energy.
       ``(e)  Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) The term `covered item of supply' means an item that 
     is purchased for inclusion in a covered system, and the loss 
     of integrity of which could result in a supply chain risk for 
     a covered system.
       ``(2) The term `covered official' means any of the 
     following:
       ``(A) The Under Secretary of Energy.
       ``(B) The Under Secretary of Energy for Science.
       ``(C) The Administrator for Nuclear Security.
       ``(D) The Administrator of the Energy Information 
     Administration.
       ``(E) The Administrator of the Bonneville Power 
     Administration.
       ``(F) The Administrator of the Southeastern Power 
     Administration.
       ``(G) The Administrator of the Southwestern Power 
     Administration.
       ``(H) The Administrator of the Western Area Power 
     Administration.
       ``(I) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of 
     Energy.
       ``(3) The term `covered procurement' means--
       ``(A) a source selection for a covered system or a covered 
     item of supply involving either a performance specification, 
     as described in paragraph (1)(C)(ii) of section 2305(a) of 
     title 10, United States Code, or an evaluation factor, as 
     described in paragraph (2)(A) of such section, relating to 
     supply chain risk;
       ``(B) the consideration of proposals for and issuance of a 
     task or delivery order for a covered system or a covered item 
     of supply if the task or delivery order contract concerned 
     includes a contract clause establishing a requirement 
     relating to supply chain risk; or
       ``(C) any contract action involving a contract for a 
     covered system or a covered item of supply if such contract 
     includes a clause establishing requirements relating to 
     supply chain risk.
       ``(4) The term `covered procurement action' means, with 
     respect to an action that occurs in the course of conducting 
     a covered procurement, any of the following:
       ``(A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet 
     qualification standards established in accordance with the 
     requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States Code, 
     for the purpose of reducing supply chain risk in the 
     acquisition of covered systems.
       ``(B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve an 
     acceptable rating with respect to an evaluation factor 
     providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in the 
     evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract or the 
     issuance of a task or delivery order.
       ``(C) The withholding of consent for a contractor to 
     subcontract with a particular source or the direction to a 
     contractor for a covered system to exclude a particular 
     source from consideration for a subcontract under the 
     contract.
       ``(5) The term `covered system' means--
       ``(A) nuclear weapons;
       ``(B) components of nuclear weapons;
       ``(C) items associated with the design, development, 
     production, and maintenance of nuclear weapons or components 
     of nuclear weapons; and
       ``(D) items associated with the surveillance of the nuclear 
     weapon stockpile; and
       ``(E) any national security system (as defined in section 
     3542(b)(2) of title 44, United States Code).
       ``(6) The term `supply chain risk' means the risk that an 
     adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce an unwanted 
     function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, 
     manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, 
     operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to 
     surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, 
     use, or operation of such system.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the 
     beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item 
     relating to section 4805 the following new item:

``Sec. 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain 
              risk.''.

       (c) Effective Date.--Section 4806 of the Atomic Energy 
     Defense Act, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with 
     respect to--
       (1) contracts that are awarded on or after the date that is 
     180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
       (2) task and delivery orders that are issued on or after 
     the date that is 180 days after such date of enactment under 
     contracts awarded before, on, or after such date of 
     enactment.

     SEC. 3116. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NATIONAL 
                   NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) Limitation.--Except as provided by subsection (c), of 
     the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     National Nuclear Security Administration, $139,500,000 may 
     not be obligated or expended until the date on which the 
     Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the 
     congressional defense committees--
       (1) a detailed plan to realize the planned efficiencies; 
     and
       (2) written certification that the planned efficiencies 
     will be achieved during fiscal year 2014.
       (b) Unrealized Efficiencies.--If the Administrator does not 
     submit to the congressional defense committees the matters 
     described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) by the 
     date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this 
     Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional 
     defense committees a report on--
       (1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not be 
     realized during fiscal year 2014; and
       (2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned 
     efficiencies to the programs funded under the directed 
     stockpile work and nuclear programs accounts.

[[Page 8982]]

       (c) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall 
     not--
       (1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for 
     directed stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval Reactors; 
     or
       (2) affect the authority of the Secretary under sections 
     4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 
     U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751).
       (d) Planned Efficiencies Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``planned efficiencies'' means the $106,800,000, with 
     respect to directed stockpile work, and $32,700,000, with 
     respect to nuclear programs, that the Administrator plans to 
     save during fiscal year 2014 through management efficiency 
     and workforce restructuring reductions, as described in the 
     budget request for fiscal year 2014 that the President 
     submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, 
     United States Code.

     SEC. 3117. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF 
                   THE ADMINISTRATOR.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Office 
     of the Administrator, not more than 75 percent may be 
     obligated or expended until--
       (1) the President transmits to Congress the matters 
     required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 
     4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
     2525(f)(2));
       (2) the President transmits to the congressional defense 
     committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 
     and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives the matters required to be transmitted during 
     2013 and 2014 under section 1043 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1576) with respect to such matters for which the 
     Secretary of Energy is responsible;
       (3) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the 
     congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign 
     Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
     of the House of Representatives the reports required to be 
     submitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 3122(b)(1) of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 
     (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1710); and
       (4) the Administrator submits to the congressional defense 
     committees--
       (A) the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship, 
     management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted 
     during 2013 under paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) of the 
     Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)); and
       (B) the summary of the plan required to be submitted during 
     2014 under paragraph (1) of such section.

     SEC. 3118. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GLOBAL 
                   THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that, 
     particularly in the current constrained budget environment, 
     the National Nuclear Security Administration should--
       (1) prioritize its primary mission of sustaining and 
     modernizing the nuclear weapons stockpile; and
       (2) shift funding from secondary missions if required to 
     ensure critical nuclear weapons modernization programs stay 
     on schedule and deliver nuclear warheads needed to support 
     the military requirements of the United States.
       (b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 
     by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 
     for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative of the National 
     Nuclear Security Administration, not more than 80 percent may 
     be obligated or expended unless, by not later than 60 days 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
     Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies to the 
     congressional defense committees that the B61 life extension 
     program will deliver a first production unit in fiscal year 
     2019.
       (c) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (b) shall not 
     affect the authority of the Secretary under Section 4702 of 
     the AEDA (50 U.S.C. 2742).

     SEC. 3119. ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, 
                   ANALYSIS, TESTING, AND RESPONSE.

       (a) Establishment.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security 
     shall establish within the nuclear security enterprise (as 
     defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 
     (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) a Center for Security Technology, 
     Analysis, Testing, and Response.
       (b) Duties.--The center established under subsection (a) 
     shall carry out the following:
       (1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of Defense 
     Nuclear Security, and the management and operating 
     contractors of the nuclear security enterprise a wide range 
     of objective expertise on security technologies, systems, 
     analysis, testing, and response forces.
       (2) Assist the Administrator in developing standards, 
     requirements, analysis methods, and testing criteria with 
     respect to security.
       (3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons learned with 
     respect to security.
       (4) Support inspections and oversight activities with 
     respect to security.
       (5) Promote professional development and training for 
     security professionals.
       (6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement for security-
     related acquisitions that affect multiple facilities of the 
     nuclear security enterprise.
       (7) Advocate for continual improvement and security 
     excellence throughout the nuclear security enterprise.

     SEC. 3120. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF 
                   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS.

       (a) Bid Protest.--Subsection (a) of section 3121 of the 
     National Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 
     112-239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended by inserting ``or the 
     date on which a protest with respect to such a contract is 
     resolved'' before the period at the end.
       (b) Expected Cost Savings.--Subsection (b)(1) of such 
     section is amended by inserting ``, including a description 
     of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to determine 
     such expected cost savings'' before the semicolon.
       (c) Naval Reactors.--Subsection (d) of such section is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) Naval reactors.--The requirement for reports under 
     subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a management 
     and operations contract for a Naval Reactor facility.''.

     SEC. 3121. W88-1 WARHEAD AND W78-1 WARHEAD LIFE EXTENSION 
                   OPTIONS.

       In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A of the Joint W78/
     88-1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the Secretary of Defense 
     and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Nuclear 
     Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, 
     United States Code, shall include during such phases a full 
     analysis of feasibility, design definition, and cost 
     estimation for each of the following life extension options:
       (1) A separate life extension option to produce a W78-1 
     warhead.
       (2) A separate life extension option to produce a W88-1 
     warhead.
       (3) An interoperable W78/88-1 life extension option.
       (4) Any other option that the Nuclear Weapons Council 
     considers appropriate.

     SEC. 3122. EXTENSION OF PRINCIPLES OF PILOT PROGRAM TO 
                   ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY 
                   ENTERPRISE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) In April 2006, the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
     initiated a pilot program to improve and streamline oversight 
     of the Kansas City Plant of the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration.
       (2) In a memorandum initiating the pilot, the Administrator 
     cited slow progress in implementing previous efforts to 
     streamline such oversight, saying that such slow progress 
     ``is a reflection of excessive risk aversion''.
       (3) The pilot program shifted away from reliance on 
     directives of the Department of Energy and toward third-party 
     certification and industrial standards whenever possible--but 
     the pilot program specifically exempted certain high-hazard 
     operations from its scope.
       (4) An independent assessment conducted one year after 
     initiation of the pilot found approximately $14,000,000 had 
     been saved in fiscal year 2007 because of the pilot program.
       (5) The independent assessment found that ``the replacement 
     of Department of Energy prescriptive requirements with site 
     specific standards and operating systems was observed to be a 
     significant cost reduction driver. . .in several business 
     areas, this reduction was accomplished by moving toward the 
     use of metrics and benchmarks rather than transactional 
     oversight.''.
       (6) The independent assessment further found that ``no 
     immediate or negative impacts were observed as a result'' of 
     the pilot program and that ``the lessons learned at [the 
     Kansas City Plant] can and should be applied at other NNSA 
     and DOE sites'', while acknowledging that application of such 
     lessons would be limited by the presence of high-risk, high-
     hazard activities at such locations.
       (7) The independent assessment concluded, ``it is our 
     opinion that these elements can be encouraged and developed 
     over time at each NNSA facility, subject to the limitations 
     made necessary by the nature of the site.''.
       (b) Extension of Policies.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (2), the 
     Administrator for Nuclear Security shall--
       (A) ensure that the principles of the pilot program are 
     permanently implemented at the Kansas City Plant of the 
     National Nuclear Security Administration; and
       (B) in accordance with paragraph (3), extend such 
     principles of the pilot program, with modifications as the 
     Administrator determines appropriate, to not less than two 
     additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise (as 
     defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 
     (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)), with such principles commencing at each 
     facility not later than one year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act.
       (2) Exemption.--In carrying out the extension of the 
     principles of the pilot program pursuant to subparagraph (A) 
     and (B) of paragraph (1), the Administrator--
       (A) may exempt high-hazard or high-risk activities from 
     such extension;
       (B) shall exempt nuclear operations from such extension; 
     and
       (C) shall focus the initial extension of such principles on 
     low-risk, high-reward initiatives.
       (3) Implementation.--
       (A) In extending the principles of the pilot program to not 
     less than two facilities under paragraph (1)(B), the 
     Administrator shall certify to the appropriate congressional 
     committees that--
       (i) the management and operating contractor for such a 
     facility has sufficiently mature processes, as well as high 
     performance, to enable the extension without undue risk; and
       (ii) Federal oversight mechanisms are in place and 
     sufficiently mature to enable the extension without undue 
     risk.
       (B) If the Administrator cannot make a certification under 
     subparagraph (A) with respect to a facility--

[[Page 8983]]

       (i) the Administrator shall delay the extension of the 
     principles of the pilot program to such facility until the 
     date on which the Administrator makes such certification; and
       (ii) not later than one year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a report regarding--

       (I) the improvements to processes, procedures, and 
     performance that are required to make such certification;
       (II) a plan with respect to the activities that the 
     Administrator will carry out to make such improvements; and
       (III) the date by which the Administrator expects to make 
     such certification and extend the principles of the pilot 
     program.

       (4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
       (A) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
     the following:
       (i) The congressional defense committees.
       (ii) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 
     Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House 
     of Representatives.
       (B) The term ``principles of the pilot program'' means the 
     principles regarding the use of third-party certification, 
     industrial standards, best business practices, and 
     verification of internal procedures and performance to 
     improve and streamline oversight, as demonstrated in the 
     pilot program at the Kansas City Plant of the Administration 
     described in subsection (a)(1).

                          Subtitle C--Reports

     SEC. 3131. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF THE 
                   SECURITY OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.

       (a) In General.--Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 4506. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF THE 
                   SECURITY OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.

       ``Not later than September 30 of each year, the 
     Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of Energy and to 
     the congressional defense committees--
       ``(1) a report detailing the status of the security of the 
     nuclear security enterprise, including the status of the 
     security of special nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and 
     classified information at each nuclear weapons production 
     facility and national security laboratory; and
       ``(2) written certification that the special nuclear 
     material, nuclear weapons, and classified information in the 
     custody of the Administration are secure.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents at the 
     beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item 
     relating to section 4506 and inserting the following new 
     item:

``Sec. 4506. Annual report and certification on status of the security 
              of the nuclear security enterprise.''.

     SEC. 3132. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORTS REGARDING THE 
                   CONDITION OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.

       (a) Report on Assessments.--Subsection (e) of section 4205 
     of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``; and'' and 
     inserting a semicolon;
       (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(E) a concise summary of any significant finding 
     investigations initiated or active during the previous year 
     for which the head of the national security laboratory has 
     full or partial responsibility.''; and
       (2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:
       ``(4) In the case of a report submitted by the Commander of 
     the United States Strategic Command--
       ``(A) a discussion of the relative merits of other nuclear 
     weapon types (if any), or compensatory measures (if any) that 
     could be taken, that could enable accomplishment of the 
     missions of the nuclear weapon types to which the assessments 
     relate, should such assessments identify any deficiency with 
     respect to such nuclear weapon types; and
       ``(B) a summary of all major assembly releases in place as 
     of the date of the report for the active and inactive nuclear 
     weapon stockpiles.''.
       (b) Reports Submitted to the President and Congress.--
     Subsection (f) of such section is amended by adding at the 
     end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) If the President does not forward to Congress the 
     matters required under paragraph (2) by the date required 
     under such paragraph, each official specified in subsection 
     (b) shall submit to the congressional defense committees the 
     report, without change, that the official submitted to the 
     Secretary concerned under subsection (e).''.

     SEC. 3133. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

       (a) Report on Counterintelligence and Security Practices at 
     National Laboratories.--
       (1) In general.--Section 4507 of the Atomic Energy Defense 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is repealed.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents at the 
     beginning of the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by 
     striking the item relating to section 4507.
       (b) Reports on Advanced Supercomputer Sales to Certain 
     Foreign Nations.--Section 3157 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 50 
     U.S.C. App. 2404 note) is repealed.

                       Subtitle D--Other Matters

     SEC. 3141. CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY PANEL ON THE GOVERNANCE OF 
                   THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.

       Section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2208) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (d)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``180 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``October 1, 
     2013''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``February 1, 2014'' and 
     inserting ``March 1, 2014''; and
       (2) by amending subsection (f) to read as follows:
       ``(f) Termination.--
       ``(1) In general.--The advisory panel shall terminate not 
     later than September 30, 2014.
       ``(2) Final report.--Before terminating, the advisory panel 
     may submit to the officials and committees specified in 
     subsection (d)(1) a final report that includes a summary of 
     the activities and recommendations of the advisory panel and 
     such other matters as the advisory panel considers 
     appropriate.''.

     SEC. 3142. STUDY OF POTENTIAL REUSE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON 
                   SECONDARIES.

       (a) Study.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
     shall conduct a study of the potential reuse of nuclear 
     weapon secondaries that includes an assessment of the 
     potential for reusing secondaries in future life extension 
     programs, including--
       (1) a description of which secondaries could be reused;
       (2) the number of such secondaries available in the 
     stockpile as of the date of the study; and
       (3) the number of such secondaries that are planned to be 
     available after such date as a result of the dismantlement of 
     nuclear weapons.
       (b) Matters Included.--The study under subsection (a) shall 
     include the following:
       (1) The feasibility and practicability of potential full or 
     partial reuse options with respect to nuclear weapon 
     secondaries.
       (2) The benefits and risks of reusing such secondaries.
       (3) A list of technical challenges that must be resolved to 
     certify aged materials under dynamic loading conditions and 
     the full stockpile-to-target sequence of weapons, including a 
     program plan and timeline for resolving such technical 
     challenges and an assessment of the importance of resolving 
     outstanding materials issues on certifying aged secondaries.
       (4) The potential costs and cost savings of such reuse.
       (5) The effects of such reuse on the requirements for 
     secondaries manufacturing.
       (6) An assessment of how such reuse affects plans to build 
     a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure.
       (c) Submission.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the 
     Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense 
     committees the study under subsection (a).

     SEC. 3143. CLARIFICATION OF ROLE OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY.

       The amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 2169) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense 
     Act (50 U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed as affecting the 
     authority of the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out 
     national security programs, with respect to the management, 
     planning, and oversight of the National Nuclear Security 
     Administration or as affecting the delegation by the 
     Secretary of Energy of authority to carry out such 
     activities, as set forth under subsection (a) of such section 
     4102 as it existed before the amendment made by such section 
     3113.

     SEC. 3144. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954.

       Chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 
     et seq.), as amended by section 3176 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 
     126 Stat. 2215), is amended in the matter following section 
     111 by inserting before ``a. The Commission'' the following: 
     ``SEC. 112. DOMESTIC MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION.--''.

          TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

     SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION.

       There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 
     $29,915,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear 
     Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy 
     Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).

     SEC. 3202. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 
                   SAFETY BOARD.

       (a) Cost-benefit Analysis.--Subsection (a) of section 315 
     of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286d(a)) is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
     paragraph (3):
       ``(3) The Secretary may request an analysis from the Board 
     regarding the costs and benefits of any draft or final 
     recommendation. If the Secretary requests such an analysis, 
     the Board shall transmit to the Secretary such analysis by 
     not later than 30 days after the date of the request. The 
     Board shall make such analysis available to the public when 
     the associated recommendation is made available to the public 
     under subsection (b) or promptly thereafter. Additionally, if 
     the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Secretary shall 
     conduct an analysis of the costs and benefits of the 
     recommendation and make such analysis available

[[Page 8984]]

     to the public together with the response of the Secretary to 
     the Board under subsection (c).''.
       (b) Recommendations.--Paragraph (5) of section 312(b) of 
     such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286a(b)(5)) is amended to read as 
     follows:
       ``(5) Recommendations.--The Board shall make such 
     recommendations to the Secretary of Energy with respect to 
     Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities, including 
     operations of such facilities, standards, and research needs, 
     as the Board determines are necessary to ensure adequate 
     protection of public health and safety. In making its 
     recommendations, the Board shall--
       ``(A) use rigorous, quantitative analysis;
       ``(B) specifically assess risk (whenever sufficient data 
     exists);
       ``(C) specifically assess the use of various 
     administrative, passive, and engineered controls for 
     implementing the recommended measures; and
       ``(D) specifically assess the technical and economic 
     feasibility of implementing the recommended measures.''.

                 TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

     SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       (a) Amount.--There are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
     to the Secretary of Energy $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 
     for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 
     of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval 
     petroleum reserves.
       (b) Period of Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to 
     the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall 
     remain available until expended.

                  TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

     SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL 
                   SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR 
                   FISCAL YEAR 2014.

       Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
     year 2014, to be available without fiscal year limitation if 
     so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the 
     Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration 
     programs associated with maintaining national security 
     aspects of the merchant marine, as follows:
       (1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United 
     States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,268,000, of which--
       (A) $67,268,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     Academy operations; and
       (B) $14,000,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     capital asset management at the Academy.
       (2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime 
     academies, $17,100,000, of which--
       (A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     student incentive payments;
       (B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     direct payments to such academies; and
       (C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training 
     vessels.
       (3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the 
     National Defense Reserve Fleet, $2,000,000, to remain 
     available until expended.
       (4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-
     flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of 
     the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United 
     States Code, $183,000,000.
       (5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the 
     Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan 
     guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of 
     title 46, United States Code, $72,655,000, of which 
     $2,655,000 shall remain available until expended for 
     administrative expenses of the program.

     SEC. 3502. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF VESSEL WAR RISK 
                   INSURANCE PROGRAM.

       Section 53912 of title 46, United States Code, is amended 
     by striking ``December 31, 2015'' and inserting ``December 
     31, 2020''.

     SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) It is in the interest of United States national 
     security that the United States merchant marine, both ships 
     and mariners, serve as a naval auxiliary in times of war or 
     national emergency.
       (2) The readiness of the United States merchant fleet 
     should be augmented by a Government-owned reserve fleet 
     comprised of ships with national defense features that may 
     not be available immediately in sufficient numbers or types 
     in the active United States-owned, United States-flagged, and 
     United States-crewed commercial industry.
       (3) The Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime Administration, 
     a component of the National Defense Reserve Fleet, plays an 
     important role in United States national security by 
     providing necessary readiness and efficiency in the form of a 
     Government-owned sealift fleet.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) maintaining a United States shipbuilding base is 
     critical to meeting United States national security 
     requirements;
       (2) it is of vital importance that the Ready Reserve Force 
     of the Maritime Administration remains capable, modern, and 
     efficient in order to best serve the national security needs 
     of the United States in times of war or national emergency;
       (3) Federal agencies must consider investment options for 
     replacing aging vessels within the Ready Reserve Force to 
     meet future operational commitments;
       (4) investment in recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force 
     may include--
       (A) construction of dual-use vessels, based on need, for 
     use in the America's Marine Highway Program of the Department 
     of Transportation, as a recent study performed under a 
     cooperative agreement between the Maritime Administration and 
     the Navy demonstrated that dual-use vessels transporting 
     domestic freight between United States ports could be called 
     upon to supplement sealift capacity;
       (B) construction of tanker vessels to meet military 
     transport needs; and
       (C) construction of vessels for use in transporting 
     potential new energy exports; and
       (5) the Department of Transportation, in consultation with 
     the Navy, should pursue the most cost-effective means of 
     recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force, including by 
     promoting the building of new vessels that are militarily 
     useful and commercially viable.

                       DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

     SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES.

       (a) In General.--Whenever a funding table in this division 
     specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, 
     or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified 
     dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby 
     authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
       (b) Merit-based Decisions.--A decision to commit, obligate, 
     or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of 
     a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
       (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in 
     accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 
     of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive 
     procedures; and
       (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law.
       (c) Relationship to Transfer and Programming Authority.--An 
     amount specified in the funding tables in this division may 
     be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or 
     reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this 
     Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an 
     amount specified in such funding tables shall not count 
     against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under 
     section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other 
     provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would 
     move funds between appropriation accounts.
       (d) Applicability to Classified Annex.--This section 
     applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.
       (e) Oral and Written Communications.--No oral or written 
     communication concerning any amount specified in the funding 
     tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of 
     this section.

                         TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

     SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
            SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2014          House
       Line                 Item              Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                    ARMY
                   FIXED WING
001                UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT.          19,730          19,730
002                AERIAL COMMON SENSOR          142,050         142,050
                    (ACS) (MIP).
003                MQ-1 UAV.............         518,460         518,460
004                RQ-11 (RAVEN)........          10,772          10,772
                   ROTARY
005                HELICOPTER, LIGHT              96,227         231,327
                    UTILITY (LUH).
                       Program increase                        [115,100]
                       for additional
                       aircraft.
                       Program increase                         [20,000]
                       for fielding.
006                AH-64 APACHE BLOCK            608,469         608,469
                    IIIA REMAN.
007                   ADVANCE                    150,931         150,931
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
011                UH-60 BLACKHAWK M           1,046,976       1,046,976
                    MODEL (MYP).
012                   ADVANCE                    116,001         116,001
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).

[[Page 8985]]

 
013                CH-47 HELICOPTER.....         801,650         801,650
014                   ADVANCE                     98,376          98,376
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
                   MODIFICATION OF
                    AIRCRAFT
015                MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS....          97,781          97,781
016                GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP).          10,262          10,262
017                MULTI SENSOR ABN               12,467          12,467
                    RECON (MIP).
018                AH-64 MODS...........          53,559          53,559
019                CH-47 CARGO                   149,764         149,764
                    HELICOPTER MODS
                    (MYP).
020                UTILITY/CARGO                  17,500          17,500
                    AIRPLANE MODS.
021                UTILITY HELICOPTER             74,095          74,095
                    MODS.
022                KIOWA MODS WARRIOR...         184,044         184,044
023                NETWORK AND MISSION           152,569         152,569
                    PLAN.
024                COMMS, NAV                     92,779          92,779
                    SURVEILLANCE.
025                GATM ROLLUP..........          65,613          65,613
026                RQ-7 UAV MODS........         121,902         121,902
                   GROUND SUPPORT
                    AVIONICS
027                AIRCRAFT                       47,610          47,610
                    SURVIVABILITY
                    EQUIPMENT.
028                SURVIVABILITY CM.....           5,700           5,700
029                CMWS.................         126,869         126,869
                   OTHER SUPPORT
030                AVIONICS SUPPORT                6,809           6,809
                    EQUIPMENT.
031                COMMON GROUND                  65,397          65,397
                    EQUIPMENT.
032                AIRCREW INTEGRATED             45,841          45,841
                    SYSTEMS.
033                AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL..          79,692          79,692
034                INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES           1,615           1,615
035                LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET           2,877           2,877
                        TOTAL AIRCRAFT         5,024,387       5,159,487
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        ARMY.
 
                   MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
                    ARMY
                   SURFACE-TO-AIR
                    MISSILE SYSTEM
002                MSE MISSILE..........         540,401         540,401
                   AIR-TO-SURFACE
                    MISSILE SYSTEM
003                HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY.           4,464           4,464
                   ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
                    MISSILE SYS
004                JAVELIN (AAWS-M)              110,510         110,510
                    SYSTEM SUMMARY.
005                TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY.          49,354          49,354
006                   ADVANCE                     19,965          19,965
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
007                GUIDED MLRS ROCKET            237,216         237,216
                    (GMLRS).
008                MLRS REDUCED RANGE             19,022          19,022
                    PRACTICE ROCKETS
                    (RRPR).
                   MODIFICATIONS
010                PATRIOT MODS.........         256,438         256,438
011                STINGER MODS.........          37,252          37,252
012                ITAS/TOW MODS........          20,000          20,000
013                MLRS MODS............          11,571          11,571
014                HIMARS MODIFICATIONS.           6,105           6,105
                   SPARES AND REPAIR
                    PARTS
015                SPARES AND REPAIR              11,222          11,222
                    PARTS.
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                    FACILITIES
016                AIR DEFENSE TARGETS..           3,530           3,530
017                ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           1,748           1,748
                    (MISSILES).
018                PRODUCTION BASE                 5,285           5,285
                    SUPPORT.
                        TOTAL MISSILE          1,334,083       1,334,083
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        ARMY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
                    ARMY
                   TRACKED COMBAT
                    VEHICLES
001                STRYKER VEHICLE......         374,100         374,100
                   MODIFICATION OF
                    TRACKED COMBAT
                    VEHICLES
002                STRYKER (MOD)........          20,522          20,522
003                FIST VEHICLE (MOD)...          29,965          29,965
004                BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)         158,000         158,000
005                HOWITZER, MED SP FT             4,769           4,769
                    155MM M109A6 (MOD).
006                PALADIN INTEGRATED            260,177         260,177
                    MANAGEMENT (PIM).
007                IMPROVED RECOVERY             111,031         186,031
                    VEHICLE (M88A2
                    HERCULES).
                       Program increase.                        [75,000]
008                ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD).           2,500           2,500
009                ASSAULT BREACHER               62,951          93,951
                    VEHICLE.
                       Program increase.                        [31,000]
010                M88 FOV MODS.........          28,469          28,469
011                JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE.           2,002           2,002
012                M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD).         178,100         178,100
013                ABRAMS UPGRADE                                168,000
                    PROGRAM.
                       Program increase.                       [168,000]
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                    FACILITIES
014                PRODUCTION BASE                 1,544           1,544
                    SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV).
                   WEAPONS & OTHER
                    COMBAT VEHICLES
015                INTEGRATED AIR BURST           69,147           8,147
                    WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY.
                       Funding ahead of                        [-50,000]
                       need.
                       Transfer to PE                          [-11,000]
                       64601A per Army's
                       request.
018                MORTAR SYSTEMS.......           5,310           5,310

[[Page 8986]]

 
019                XM320 GRENADE                  24,049          24,049
                    LAUNCHER MODULE
                    (GLM).
021                CARBINE..............          70,846          48,846
                       Funding ahead of                        [-22,000]
                       need.
023                COMMON REMOTELY                56,580          56,580
                    OPERATED WEAPONS
                    STATION.
024                HANDGUN..............             300             300
                   MOD OF WEAPONS AND
                    OTHER COMBAT VEH
026                M777 MODS............          39,300          39,300
027                M4 CARBINE MODS......          10,300          10,300
028                M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN          33,691          33,691
                    MODS.
029                M249 SAW MACHINE GUN            7,608           7,608
                    MODS.
030                M240 MEDIUM MACHINE             2,719           2,719
                    GUN MODS.
031                SNIPER RIFLES                   7,017           7,017
                    MODIFICATIONS.
032                M119 MODIFICATIONS...          18,707          18,707
033                M16 RIFLE MODS.......           2,136           2,136
034                MODIFICATIONS LESS              1,569           1,569
                    THAN $5.0M (WOCV-
                    WTCV).
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                    FACILITIES
035                ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           2,024           2,024
                    (WOCV-WTCV).
036                PRODUCTION BASE                10,108          10,108
                    SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV).
037                INDUSTRIAL                        459             459
                    PREPAREDNESS.
038                SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT            1,267           1,267
                    (SOLDIER ENH PROG).
                        TOTAL                  1,597,267       1,788,267
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        W&TCV, ARMY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF
                    AMMUNITION, ARMY
                   SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
                    AMMUNITION
002                CTG, 5.56MM, ALL              112,167          87,167
                    TYPES.
                       Unit cost                               [-25,000]
                       efficiencies--Arm
                       y requested
                       reduction.
003                CTG, 7.62MM, ALL               58,571          53,571
                    TYPES.
                       Unit cost                                [-5,000]
                       efficiencies--Arm
                       y requested
                       reduction.
004                CTG, HANDGUN, ALL               9,858           9,858
                    TYPES.
005                CTG, .50 CAL, ALL              80,037          55,037
                    TYPES.
                       Unit cost                               [-25,000]
                       efficiencies--Arm
                       y requested
                       reduction.
007                CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES.          16,496          16,496
008                CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES.          69,533          50,033
                       Unit cost                               [-19,500]
                       efficiencies--Arm
                       y requested
                       reduction.
009                CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES.          55,781          55,781
                   MORTAR AMMUNITION
010                60MM MORTAR, ALL               38,029          38,029
                    TYPES.
011                81MM MORTAR, ALL               24,656          24,656
                    TYPES.
012                120MM MORTAR, ALL              60,781          60,781
                    TYPES.
                   TANK AMMUNITION
013                CARTRIDGES, TANK,             121,551         121,551
                    105MM AND 120MM, ALL
                    TYPES.
                   ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014                ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES,          39,825          39,825
                    75MM & 105MM, ALL
                    TYPES.
015                ARTILLERY PROJECTILE,          37,902          37,902
                    155MM, ALL TYPES.
016                PROJ 155MM EXTENDED            67,896          67,896
                    RANGE M982.
017                ARTILLERY                      71,205          71,205
                    PROPELLANTS, FUZES
                    AND PRIMERS, ALL.
                   ROCKETS
020                SHOULDER LAUNCHED               1,012           1,012
                    MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES.
021                ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL         108,476         108,476
                    TYPES.
                   OTHER AMMUNITION
022                DEMOLITION MUNITIONS,          24,074          24,074
                    ALL TYPES.
023                GRENADES, ALL TYPES..          33,242          33,242
024                SIGNALS, ALL TYPES...           7,609           7,609
025                SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES           5,228           5,228
                   MISCELLANEOUS
026                AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL           16,700          16,700
                    TYPES.
027                NON-LETHAL                      7,366           7,366
                    AMMUNITION, ALL
                    TYPES.
028                CAD/PAD ALL TYPES....           3,614           3,614
029                ITEMS LESS THAN $5             12,423          12,423
                    MILLION (AMMO).
030                AMMUNITION PECULIAR            16,604          16,604
                    EQUIPMENT.
031                FIRST DESTINATION              14,328          14,328
                    TRANSPORTATION
                    (AMMO).
032                CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES.             108             108
                   PRODUCTION BASE
                    SUPPORT
033                PROVISION OF                  242,324         242,324
                    INDUSTRIAL
                    FACILITIES.
034                CONVENTIONAL                  179,605         179,605
                    MUNITIONS
                    DEMILITARIZATION.
035                ARMS INITIATIVE......           3,436           3,436
                        TOTAL                  1,540,437       1,465,937
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        AMMUNITION, ARMY.
 
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                    ARMY
                   TACTICAL VEHICLES
001                TACTICAL TRAILERS/              4,000           4,000
                    DOLLY SETS.
002                SEMITRAILERS,                   6,841           6,841
                    FLATBED:.
003                FAMILY OF MEDIUM              223,910         223,910
                    TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
004                FIRETRUCKS &                   11,880          11,880
                    ASSOCIATED
                    FIREFIGHTING EQUIP.
005                FAMILY OF HEAVY                14,731          14,731
                    TACTICAL VEHICLES
                    (FHTV).
006                PLS ESP..............          44,252          44,252
009                HVY EXPANDED MOBILE            39,525          39,525
                    TACTICAL TRUCK EXT
                    SERV.
011                TACTICAL WHEELED               51,258          25,958
                    VEHICLE PROTECTION
                    KITS.
                       Funding ahead of                        [-25,300]
                       need.

[[Page 8987]]

 
012                MODIFICATION OF IN             49,904          49,904
                    SVC EQUIP.
013                MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-          2,200           2,200
                    PROTECTED (MRAP)
                    MODS.
                   NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
014                HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN..             400             400
015                PASSENGER CARRYING                716             716
                    VEHICLES.
016                NONTACTICAL VEHICLES,           5,619           5,619
                    OTHER.
                   COMM--JOINT
                    COMMUNICATIONS
018                WIN-T--GROUND FORCES          973,477         973,477
                    TACTICAL NETWORK.
019                SIGNAL MODERNIZATION           14,120          14,120
                    PROGRAM.
020                JOINT INCIDENT SITE             7,869           7,869
                    COMMUNICATIONS
                    CAPABILITY.
021                JCSE EQUIPMENT                  5,296           5,296
                    (USREDCOM).
                   COMM--SATELLITE
                    COMMUNICATIONS
022                DEFENSE ENTERPRISE            147,212         147,212
                    WIDEBAND SATCOM
                    SYSTEMS.
023                TRANSPORTABLE                   7,998           7,998
                    TACTICAL COMMAND
                    COMMUNICATIONS.
024                SHF TERM.............           7,232           7,232
025                NAVSTAR GLOBAL                  3,308           3,308
                    POSITIONING SYSTEM
                    (SPACE).
026                SMART-T (SPACE)......          13,992          13,992
028                GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--            28,206          28,206
                    GBS.
029                MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP             2,778           2,778
                    (TAC SAT).
                   COMM--C3 SYSTEM
031                ARMY GLOBAL CMD &              17,590          17,590
                    CONTROL SYS (AGCCS).
                   COMM--COMBAT
                    COMMUNICATIONS
032                ARMY DATA                         786             786
                    DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
                    (DATA RADIO).
033                JOINT TACTICAL RADIO          382,930         382,930
                    SYSTEM.
034                MID-TIER NETWORKING            19,200          19,200
                    VEHICULAR RADIO
                    (MNVR).
035                RADIO TERMINAL SET,             1,438           1,438
                    MIDS LVT(2).
036                SINCGARS FAMILY......           9,856           9,856
037                AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--           14,184          14,184
                    OPA2.
038                TRACTOR DESK.........           6,271           6,271
040                SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT             1,030           1,030
                    PROGRAM COMM/
                    ELECTRONICS.
041                TACTICAL                       31,868          31,868
                    COMMUNICATIONS AND
                    PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
042                UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE          18,000          18,000
044                RADIO, IMPROVED HF              1,166           1,166
                    (COTS) FAMILY.
045                FAMILY OF MED COMM             22,867          22,867
                    FOR COMBAT CASUALTY
                    CARE.
                   COMM--INTELLIGENCE
                    COMM
048                CI AUTOMATION                   1,512           1,512
                    ARCHITECTURE.
049                ARMY CA/MISO GPF               61,096          61,096
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   INFORMATION SECURITY
050                TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT             13,890          13,890
                    SYS (AKMS).
051                INFORMATION SYSTEM             23,245          23,245
                    SECURITY PROGRAM-
                    ISSP.
052                BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE           3,800           3,800
053                COMMUNICATIONS                 24,711          24,711
                    SECURITY (COMSEC).
                   COMM--LONG HAUL
                    COMMUNICATIONS
055                BASE SUPPORT                   43,395          43,395
                    COMMUNICATIONS.
                   COMM--BASE
                    COMMUNICATIONS
057                INFORMATION SYSTEMS..         104,577         104,577
058                DEFENSE MESSAGE                   612             612
                    SYSTEM (DMS).
059                EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT           39,000          39,000
                    MODERNIZATION
                    PROGRAM.
060                INSTALLATION INFO             248,477         248,477
                    INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
                    PROGRAM.
                   ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
                    REL ACT (TIARA)
064                JTT/CIBS-M...........             824             824
065                PROPHET GROUND.......          59,198          59,198
067                DCGS-A (MIP).........         267,214         267,214
068                JOINT TACTICAL GROUND           9,899           9,899
                    STATION (JTAGS).
069                TROJAN (MIP).........          24,598          24,598
070                MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP             1,927           1,927
                    (INTEL SPT) (MIP).
071                CI HUMINT AUTO                  6,169           6,169
                    REPRTING AND
                    COLL(CHARCS).
072                MACHINE FOREIGN                 2,924           2,924
                    LANGUAGE TRANSLATION
                    SYSTEM-M.
                   ELECT EQUIP--
                    ELECTRONIC WARFARE
                    (EW)
074                LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER            40,735          40,735
                    MORTAR RADAR.
075                EW PLANNING &                      13              13
                    MANAGEMENT TOOLS
                    (EWPMT).
076                ENEMY UAS............           2,800           2,800
079                COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/            1,237           1,237
                    SECURITY
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
080                CI MODERNIZATION.....           1,399           1,399
                   ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
                    SURV. (TAC SURV)
082                SENTINEL MODS........          47,983          47,983
083                SENSE THROUGH THE                 142             142
                    WALL (STTW).
084                NIGHT VISION DEVICES.         202,428         202,428
085                LONG RANGE ADVANCED             5,183           5,183
                    SCOUT SURVEILLANCE
                    SYSTEM.
086                NIGHT VISION, THERMAL          14,074          14,074
                    WPN SIGHT.
087                SMALL TACTICAL                 22,300          22,300
                    OPTICAL RIFLE
                    MOUNTED MLRF.
089                GREEN LASER                     1,016           1,016
                    INTERDICTION SYSTEM
                    (GLIS).
090                INDIRECT FIRE                  55,354          55,354
                    PROTECTION FAMILY OF
                    SYSTEMS.
091                ARTILLERY ACCURACY                800             800
                    EQUIP.
092                PROFILER.............           3,027           3,027
093                MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP             1,185           1,185
                    (FIREFINDER RADARS).
094                JOINT BATTLE COMMAND--        103,214         103,214
                    PLATFORM (JBC-P).
096                MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP            26,037          26,037
                    (LLDR).
097                MORTAR FIRE CONTROL            23,100          23,100
                    SYSTEM.

[[Page 8988]]

 
098                COUNTERFIRE RADARS...         312,727         312,727
                   ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
                    C2 SYSTEMS
101                FIRE SUPPORT C2                43,228          43,228
                    FAMILY.
102                BATTLE COMMAND                 14,446          14,446
                    SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT
                    SYSTEM.
103                FAAD C2..............           4,607           4,607
104                AIR & MSL DEFENSE              33,090          33,090
                    PLANNING & CONTROL
                    SYS.
105                IAMD BATTLE COMMAND            21,200          21,200
                    SYSTEM.
107                LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE             1,795           1,795
                    SUPPORT (LCSS).
109                NETWORK MANAGEMENT             54,327          54,327
                    INITIALIZATION AND
                    SERVICE.
110                MANEUVER CONTROL               59,171          59,171
                    SYSTEM (MCS).
111                GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT          83,936          83,936
                    SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A).
113                LOGISTICS AUTOMATION.          25,476          25,476
114                RECONNAISSANCE AND             19,341          19,341
                    SURVEYING INSTRUMENT
                    SET.
                   ELECT EQUIP--
                    AUTOMATION
115                ARMY TRAINING                  11,865          11,865
                    MODERNIZATION.
116                AUTOMATED DATA                219,431         219,431
                    PROCESSING EQUIP.
117                GENERAL FUND                    6,414           6,414
                    ENTERPRISE BUSINESS
                    SYSTEMS FAM.
118                HIGH PERF COMPUTING            62,683          62,683
                    MOD PGM (HPCMP).
120                RESERVE COMPONENT              34,951          34,951
                    AUTOMATION SYS
                    (RCAS).
                   ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO
                    VISUAL SYS (A/V)
121                ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           7,440           7,440
                    (A/V).
122                ITEMS LESS THAN $5M             1,615           1,615
                    (SURVEYING
                    EQUIPMENT).
                   ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
123                PRODUCTION BASE                   554             554
                    SUPPORT (C-E).
124                BCT EMERGING                   20,000          20,000
                    TECHNOLOGIES.
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
124A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..           3,558           3,558
                   CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
                    EQUIPMENT
126                FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL              762             762
                    EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
127                BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS           20,630          20,630
                    (BDS).
128                CBRN DEFENSE.........          22,151          22,151
                   BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
130                TACTICAL BRIDGING....          14,188          14,188
131                TACTICAL BRIDGE,               23,101          23,101
                    FLOAT-RIBBON.
132                COMMON BRIDGE                  15,416          15,416
                    TRANSPORTER (CBT)
                    RECAP.
                   ENGINEER (NON-
                    CONSTRUCTION)
                    EQUIPMENT
134                GRND STANDOFF MINE             50,465          50,465
                    DETECTN SYSM
                    (GSTAMIDS).
135                ROBOTIC COMBAT                  6,490           6,490
                    SUPPORT SYSTEM
                    (RCSS).
136                EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS            1,563           1,563
                    RECAPITALIZATION.
137                EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE             20,921          20,921
                    DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
                    EQPMT).
138                REMOTE DEMOLITION                 100             100
                    SYSTEMS.
139                < $5M, COUNTERMINE              2,271           2,271
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   COMBAT SERVICE
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
140                HEATERS AND ECU'S....           7,269           7,269
141                LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS                200             200
                    AND LATRINES.
142                SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT..           1,468           1,468
143                PERSONNEL RECOVERY             26,526          26,526
                    SUPPORT SYSTEM
                    (PRSS).
144                GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM          81,680          71,680
                       Unjustified unit                        [-10,000]
                       cost growth.
147                FIELD FEEDING                  28,096          28,096
                    EQUIPMENT.
148                CARGO AERIAL DEL &             56,150          56,150
                    PERSONNEL PARACHUTE
                    SYSTEM.
149                MORTUARY AFFAIRS                3,242           3,242
                    SYSTEMS.
150                FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT          38,141          38,141
                    AND CONSTRUCTION
                    SETS.
151                ITEMS LESS THAN $5M             5,859           5,859
                    (ENG SPT).
                   PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152                DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS,          60,612          60,612
                    PETROLEUM & WATER.
                   MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
153                COMBAT SUPPORT                 22,042          22,042
                    MEDICAL.
154                MEDEVAC MISSON                 35,318          35,318
                    EQUIPMENT PACKAGE
                    (MEP).
                   MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
155                MOBILE MAINTENANCE             19,427          19,427
                    EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.
156                ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           3,860           3,860
                    (MAINT EQ).
                   CONSTRUCTION
                    EQUIPMENT
157                GRADER, ROAD MTZD,              2,000           2,000
                    HVY, 6X4 (CCE).
159                SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING          36,078          36,078
160                MISSION MODULES--               9,721           9,721
                    ENGINEERING.
162                HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR..          50,122          50,122
163                TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED          28,828          28,828
164                ALL TERRAIN CRANES...          19,863          19,863
166                HIGH MOBILITY                  23,465          23,465
                    ENGINEER EXCAVATOR
                    (HMEE).
168                ENHANCED RAPID                 13,590          13,590
                    AIRFIELD
                    CONSTRUCTION CAPAP.
169                CONST EQUIP ESP......          16,088          16,088
170                ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M           6,850           6,850
                    (CONST EQUIP).
                   RAIL FLOAT
                    CONTAINERIZATION
                    EQUIPMENT
171                ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP..          38,007          19,007
                       Funding ahead of                        [-19,000]
                       need.
172                ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M          10,605          10,605
                    (FLOAT/RAIL).
                   GENERATORS
173                GENERATORS AND                129,437         129,437
                    ASSOCIATED EQUIP.

[[Page 8989]]

 
                   MATERIAL HANDLING
                    EQUIPMENT
174                ROUGH TERRAIN                   1,250           1,250
                    CONTAINER HANDLER
                    (RTCH).
175                FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS..           8,260           8,260
                   TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176                COMBAT TRAINING               121,710         121,710
                    CENTERS SUPPORT.
177                TRAINING DEVICES,             225,200         225,200
                    NONSYSTEM.
178                CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL          30,063          30,063
                    TRAINER.
179                AVIATION COMBINED              34,913          34,913
                    ARMS TACTICAL
                    TRAINER.
180                GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN            9,955           9,955
                    SUPPORT OF ARMY
                    TRAINING.
                   TEST MEASURE AND DIG
                    EQUIPMENT (TMD)
181                CALIBRATION SETS                8,241           8,241
                    EQUIPMENT.
182                INTEGRATED FAMILY OF           67,506          67,506
                    TEST EQUIPMENT
                    (IFTE).
183                TEST EQUIPMENT                 18,755          18,755
                    MODERNIZATION
                    (TEMOD).
                   OTHER SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
184                M25 STABILIZED                  5,110           5,110
                    BINOCULAR.
185                RAPID EQUIPPING                 5,110           5,110
                    SOLDIER SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT.
186                PHYSICAL SECURITY              62,904          62,904
                    SYSTEMS (OPA3).
187                BASE LEVEL COMMON               1,427           1,427
                    EQUIPMENT.
188                MODIFICATION OF IN-            96,661          96,661
                    SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-
                    3).
189                PRODUCTION BASE                 2,450           2,450
                    SUPPORT (OTH).
190                SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR          11,593          11,593
                    USER TESTING.
191                AMC CRITICAL ITEMS              8,948           8,948
                    OPA3.
192                TRACTOR YARD.........           8,000           8,000
                   OPA2
195                INITIAL SPARES--C&E..          59,700          59,700
                        TOTAL OTHER            6,465,218       6,410,918
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        ARMY.
 
                   AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                    NAVY
                   COMBAT AIRCRAFT
001                EA-18G...............       2,001,787       1,956,787
                       Program                                 [-45,000]
                       adjustment.
003                F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER)           206,551         206,551
                    HORNET.
004                   ADVANCE                                     75,000
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
                       Program increase.                        [75,000]
005                JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER        1,135,444       1,135,444
                    CV.
006                   ADVANCE                     94,766          94,766
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
007                JSF STOVL............       1,267,260       1,267,260
008                   ADVANCE                    103,195         103,195
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
009                V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)...       1,432,573       1,432,573
010                   ADVANCE                     55,196          55,196
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
011                H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/          749,962         749,962
                    AH-1Z).
012                   ADVANCE                     71,000          71,000
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
013                MH-60S (MYP).........         383,831         383,831
014                   ADVANCE                     37,278          37,278
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
015                MH-60R (MYP).........         599,237         599,237
016                   ADVANCE                    231,834         231,834
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
017                P-8A POSEIDON........       3,189,989       3,189,989
018                   ADVANCE                    313,160         313,160
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
019                E-2D ADV HAWKEYE.....         997,107         962,107
                       Unjustified CRI                         [-35,000]
                       Funding.
020                   ADVANCE                    266,542         266,542
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
                   TRAINER AIRCRAFT
021                JPATS................         249,080         249,080
                   OTHER AIRCRAFT
022                KC-130J..............         134,358         134,358
023                   ADVANCE                     32,288          32,288
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
025                   ADVANCE                     52,002          52,002
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
026                MQ-8 UAV.............          60,980          60,980
028                OTHER SUPPORT                  14,958          14,958
                    AIRCRAFT.
                   MODIFICATION OF
                    AIRCRAFT
029                EA-6 SERIES..........          18,577          18,577
030                AEA SYSTEMS..........          48,502          48,502
031                AV-8 SERIES..........          41,575          41,575
032                ADVERSARY............           2,992           2,992
033                F-18 SERIES..........         875,371         875,371
034                H-46 SERIES..........           2,127           2,127
036                H-53 SERIES..........          67,675          67,675
037                SH-60 SERIES.........         135,054         135,054
038                H-1 SERIES...........          41,706          41,706
039                EP-3 SERIES..........          55,903          77,903
                       12th Aircraft                             [8,000]
                       Spiral 3 Upgrade.
                       Multi-INT Sensor                         [14,000]
                       Kits &
                       Installation.
040                P-3 SERIES...........          37,436          37,436
041                E-2 SERIES...........          31,044          31,044
042                TRAINER A/C SERIES...          43,720          43,720
043                C-2A.................             902             902
044                C-130 SERIES.........          47,587          47,587
045                FEWSG................             665             665
046                CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C            14,587          14,587
                    SERIES.

[[Page 8990]]

 
047                E-6 SERIES...........         189,312         189,312
048                EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS          85,537          85,537
                    SERIES.
049                SPECIAL PROJECT                 3,684          16,684
                    AIRCRAFT.
                       Engineering and                           [8,000]
                       Technical
                       Services Support.
                       Multi-INT Sensor                          [5,000]
                       Kits &
                       Installation.
050                T-45 SERIES..........          98,128          98,128
051                POWER PLANT CHANGES..          22,999          22,999
052                JPATS SERIES.........           1,576           1,576
053                AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT           6,267           6,267
                    MODS.
054                COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT.         141,685         141,685
055                COMMON AVIONICS               120,660         120,660
                    CHANGES.
056                COMMON DEFENSIVE                3,554           3,554
                    WEAPON SYSTEM.
057                ID SYSTEMS...........          41,800          41,800
058                P-8 SERIES...........           9,485           9,485
059                MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION          14,431          14,431
060                MQ-8 SERIES..........           1,001           1,001
061                RQ-7 SERIES..........          26,433          26,433
062                V-22 (TILT/ROTOR              160,834         160,834
                    ACFT) OSPREY.
063                F-35 STOVL SERIES....         147,130         147,130
064                F-35 CV SERIES.......          31,100          31,100
                   AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
                    REPAIR PARTS
065                SPARES AND REPAIR           1,142,461       1,142,461
                    PARTS.
                   AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
                    EQUIP & FACILITIES
066                COMMON GROUND                 410,044         410,044
                    EQUIPMENT.
067                AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL            27,450          27,450
                    FACILITIES.
068                WAR CONSUMABLES......          28,930          28,930
069                OTHER PRODUCTION                5,268           5,268
                    CHARGES.
070                SPECIAL SUPPORT                60,306          60,306
                    EQUIPMENT.
071                FIRST DESTINATION               1,775           1,775
                    TRANSPORTATION.
                        TOTAL AIRCRAFT        17,927,651      17,957,651
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        NAVY.
 
                   WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
                    NAVY
                   MODIFICATION OF
                    MISSILES
001                TRIDENT II MODS......       1,140,865       1,126,765
                       Equipment related                       [-14,100]
                       to New START
                       treaty
                       implementation.
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                    FACILITIES
002                MISSILE INDUSTRIAL              7,617           7,617
                    FACILITIES.
                   STRATEGIC MISSILES
003                TOMAHAWK.............         312,456         312,456
                   TACTICAL MISSILES
004                AMRAAM...............          95,413          95,413
005                SIDEWINDER...........         117,208         117,208
006                JSOW.................         136,794         136,794
007                STANDARD MISSILE.....         367,985         367,985
008                RAM..................          67,596          67,596
009                HELLFIRE.............          33,916          33,916
010                STAND OFF PRECISION             6,278           6,278
                    GUIDED MUNITIONS
                    (SOPGM).
011                AERIAL TARGETS.......          41,799          41,799
012                OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT           3,538           3,538
                   MODIFICATION OF
                    MISSILES
013                ESSM.................          76,749          76,749
014                HARM MODS............         111,902         111,902
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
                    FACILITIES
015                WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL              1,138           1,138
                    FACILITIES.
016                FLEET SATELLITE COMM           23,014          23,014
                    FOLLOW-ON.
                   ORDNANCE SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
017                ORDNANCE SUPPORT               84,318          84,318
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   TORPEDOES AND RELATED
                    EQUIP
018                SSTD.................           3,978           3,978
019                ASW TARGETS..........           8,031           8,031
                   MOD OF TORPEDOES AND
                    RELATED EQUIP
020                MK-54 TORPEDO MODS...         125,898         125,898
021                MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP            53,203          53,203
                    MODS.
022                QUICKSTRIKE MINE.....           7,800           7,800
                   SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
023                TORPEDO SUPPORT                59,730          59,730
                    EQUIPMENT.
024                ASW RANGE SUPPORT....           4,222           4,222
                   DESTINATION
                    TRANSPORTATION
025                FIRST DESTINATION               3,963           3,963
                    TRANSPORTATION.
                   GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
026                SMALL ARMS AND                 12,513          12,513
                    WEAPONS.
                   MODIFICATION OF GUNS
                    AND GUN MOUNTS
027                CIWS MODS............          56,308          56,308
028                COAST GUARD WEAPONS..          10,727          10,727
029                GUN MOUNT MODS.......          72,901          72,901
030                CRUISER MODERNIZATION           1,943           1,943
                    WEAPONS.
031                AIRBORNE MINE                  19,758          19,758
                    NEUTRALIZATION
                    SYSTEMS.
                   SPARES AND REPAIR
                    PARTS
033                SPARES AND REPAIR              52,632          52,632
                    PARTS.

[[Page 8991]]

 
                        TOTAL WEAPONS          3,122,193       3,108,093
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        NAVY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
                    NAVY & MC
                   NAVY AMMUNITION
001                GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS          37,703          37,703
002                AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL          65,411          65,411
                    TYPES.
003                MACHINE GUN                    20,284          20,284
                    AMMUNITION.
004                PRACTICE BOMBS.......          37,870          37,870
005                CARTRIDGES & CART              53,764          53,764
                    ACTUATED DEVICES.
006                AIR EXPENDABLE                 67,194          67,194
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
007                JATOS................           2,749           2,749
008                LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE             3,906           3,906
                    ATTACK PROJECTILE.
009                5 INCH/54 GUN                  24,151          24,151
                    AMMUNITION.
010                INTERMEDIATE CALIBER           33,080          33,080
                    GUN AMMUNITION.
011                OTHER SHIP GUN                 40,398          40,398
                    AMMUNITION.
012                SMALL ARMS & LANDING           61,219          61,219
                    PARTY AMMO.
013                PYROTECHNIC AND                10,637          10,637
                    DEMOLITION.
014                AMMUNITION LESS THAN            4,578           4,578
                    $5 MILLION.
                   MARINE CORPS
                    AMMUNITION
015                SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION          26,297          26,297
016                LINEAR CHARGES, ALL             6,088           6,088
                    TYPES.
017                40 MM, ALL TYPES.....           7,644           7,644
018                60MM, ALL TYPES......           3,349           3,349
020                120MM, ALL TYPES.....          13,361          13,361
022                GRENADES, ALL TYPES..           2,149           2,149
023                ROCKETS, ALL TYPES...          27,465          27,465
026                FUZE, ALL TYPES......          26,366          26,366
028                AMMO MODERNIZATION...           8,403           8,403
029                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              5,201           5,201
                    MILLION.
                        TOTAL                    589,267         589,267
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        AMMO, NAVY & MC.
 
                   SHIPBUILDING &
                    CONVERSION, NAVY
                   OTHER WARSHIPS
001                CARRIER REPLACEMENT           944,866         944,866
                    PROGRAM.
003                VIRGINIA CLASS              2,930,704       3,422,704
                    SUBMARINE.
                       Increase to                             [492,000]
                       Virginia class.
004                   ADVANCE                  2,354,612       2,354,612
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
005                CVN REFUELING               1,705,424       1,705,424
                    OVERHAULS.
006                   ADVANCE                    245,793         245,793
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
007                DDG 1000.............         231,694         310,994
                       Increase to DDG                          [79,300]
                       1000.
008                DDG-51...............       1,615,564       1,615,564
009                   ADVANCE                    388,551         388,551
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
010                LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.       1,793,014       1,793,014
                   AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
012                AFLOAT FORWARD                524,000         524,000
                    STAGING BASE.
014                JOINT HIGH SPEED                2,732           2,732
                    VESSEL.
                   AUXILIARIES, CRAFT
                    AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM
                    COST
016                   ADVANCE                    183,900         183,900
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
017                OUTFITTING...........         450,163         450,163
019                LCAC SLEP............          80,987          80,987
020                COMPLETION OF PY              625,800         988,800
                    SHIPBUILDING
                    PROGRAMS.
                       DDG-51...........                       [332,000]
                       Joint High Speed                          [7,600]
                       Vessel.
                       MTS..............                        [23,400]
                        TOTAL                 14,077,804      15,012,104
                        SHIPBUILDING &
                        CONVERSION, NAVY.
 
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                    NAVY
                   SHIP PROPULSION
                    EQUIPMENT
001                LM-2500 GAS TURBINE..          10,180          10,180
002                ALLISON 501K GAS                5,536           5,536
                    TURBINE.
003                HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE          16,956          16,956
                    (HED).
                   GENERATORS
004                SURFACE COMBATANT              19,782          19,782
                    HM&E.
                   NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
005                OTHER NAVIGATION               39,509          39,509
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   PERISCOPES
006                SUB PERISCOPES &               52,515          52,515
                    IMAGING EQUIP.
                   OTHER SHIPBOARD
                    EQUIPMENT
007                DDG MOD..............         285,994         285,994
008                FIREFIGHTING                   14,389          14,389
                    EQUIPMENT.
009                COMMAND AND CONTROL             2,436           2,436
                    SWITCHBOARD.
010                LHA/LHD MIDLIFE......          12,700          12,700
011                LCC 19/20 EXTENDED             40,329          40,329
                    SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM.
012                POLLUTION CONTROL              19,603          19,603
                    EQUIPMENT.
013                SUBMARINE SUPPORT               8,678           8,678
                    EQUIPMENT.
014                VIRGINIA CLASS                 74,209          74,209
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
015                LCS CLASS SUPPORT              47,078          47,078
                    EQUIPMENT.
016                SUBMARINE BATTERIES..          37,000          37,000

[[Page 8992]]

 
017                LPD CLASS SUPPORT              25,053          25,053
                    EQUIPMENT.
018                STRATEGIC PLATFORM             12,986          12,986
                    SUPPORT EQUIP.
019                DSSP EQUIPMENT.......           2,455           2,455
020                CG MODERNIZATION.....          10,539          10,539
021                LCAC.................          14,431          14,431
022                UNDERWATER EOD                 36,700          36,700
                    PROGRAMS.
023                ITEMS LESS THAN $5            119,902         119,902
                    MILLION.
024                CHEMICAL WARFARE                3,678           3,678
                    DETECTORS.
025                SUBMARINE LIFE                  8,292           8,292
                    SUPPORT SYSTEM.
                   REACTOR PLANT
                    EQUIPMENT
027                REACTOR COMPONENTS...         286,744         286,744
                   OCEAN ENGINEERING
028                DIVING AND SALVAGE              8,780           8,780
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   SMALL BOATS
029                STANDARD BOATS.......          36,452          36,452
                   TRAINING EQUIPMENT
030                OTHER SHIPS TRAINING           36,145          36,145
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   PRODUCTION FACILITIES
                    EQUIPMENT
031                OPERATING FORCES IPE.          69,368          69,368
                   OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
032                NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS..         106,328         106,328
033                LCS COMMON MISSION             45,966          45,966
                    MODULES EQUIPMENT.
034                LCS MCM MISSION                59,885          59,885
                    MODULES.
035                LCS SUW MISSION                37,168          37,168
                    MODULES.
                   LOGISTIC SUPPORT
036                LSD MIDLIFE..........          77,974          77,974
                   SHIP SONARS
038                SPQ-9B RADAR.........          27,934          27,934
039                AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW             83,231          83,231
                    COMBAT SYSTEM.
040                SSN ACOUSTICS........         199,438         199,438
041                UNDERSEA WARFARE                9,394           9,394
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
042                SONAR SWITCHES AND             12,953          12,953
                    TRANSDUCERS.
043                ELECTRONIC WARFARE              8,958           8,958
                    MILDEC.
                   ASW ELECTRONIC
                    EQUIPMENT
044                SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC             24,077          24,077
                    WARFARE SYSTEM.
045                SSTD.................          11,925          11,925
046                FIXED SURVEILLANCE             94,338          94,338
                    SYSTEM.
047                SURTASS..............           9,680           9,680
048                MARITIME PATROL AND            18,130          18,130
                    RECONNSAISANCE FORCE.
                   ELECTRONIC WARFARE
                    EQUIPMENT
049                AN/SLQ-32............         203,375         203,375
                   RECONNAISSANCE
                    EQUIPMENT
050                SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT.         123,656         123,656
051                AUTOMATED                         896             896
                    IDENTIFICATION
                    SYSTEM (AIS).
                   SUBMARINE
                    SURVEILLANCE
                    EQUIPMENT
052                SUBMARINE SUPPORT              49,475          49,475
                    EQUIPMENT PROG.
                   OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC
                    EQUIPMENT
053                COOPERATIVE                    34,692          34,692
                    ENGAGEMENT
                    CAPABILITY.
054                TRUSTED INFORMATION               396             396
                    SYSTEM (TIS).
055                NAVAL TACTICAL                 15,703          15,703
                    COMMAND SUPPORT
                    SYSTEM (NTCSS).
056                ATDLS................           3,836           3,836
057                NAVY COMMAND AND                7,201           7,201
                    CONTROL SYSTEM
                    (NCCS).
058                MINESWEEPING SYSTEM            54,400          54,400
                    REPLACEMENT.
059                SHALLOW WATER MCM....           8,548           8,548
060                NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS          11,765          11,765
                    (SPACE).
061                AMERICAN FORCES RADIO           6,483           6,483
                    AND TV SERVICE.
062                STRATEGIC PLATFORM              7,631           7,631
                    SUPPORT EQUIP.
                   TRAINING EQUIPMENT
063                OTHER TRAINING                 53,644          53,644
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   AVIATION ELECTRONIC
                    EQUIPMENT
064                MATCALS..............           7,461           7,461
065                SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC           9,140           9,140
                    CONTROL.
066                AUTOMATIC CARRIER              20,798          20,798
                    LANDING SYSTEM.
067                NATIONAL AIR SPACE             19,754          19,754
                    SYSTEM.
068                FLEET AIR TRAFFIC               8,909           8,909
                    CONTROL SYSTEMS.
069                LANDING SYSTEMS......          13,554          13,554
070                ID SYSTEMS...........          38,934          38,934
071                NAVAL MISSION                  14,131          14,131
                    PLANNING SYSTEMS.
                   OTHER SHORE
                    ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
072                DEPLOYABLE JOINT                3,249           3,249
                    COMMAND & CONTROL.
073                MARITIME INTEGRATED            11,646          11,646
                    BROADCAST SYSTEM.
074                TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I            18,189          18,189
                    SYSTEMS.
075                DCGS-N...............          17,350          17,350
076                CANES................         340,567         340,567
077                RADIAC...............           9,835           9,835
078                CANES-INTELL.........          59,652          59,652
079                GPETE................           6,253           6,253
080                INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM             4,963           4,963
                    TEST FACILITY.
081                EMI CONTROL                     4,664           4,664
                    INSTRUMENTATION.

[[Page 8993]]

 
082                ITEMS LESS THAN $5             66,889          66,889
                    MILLION.
                   SHIPBOARD
                    COMMUNICATIONS
084                SHIP COMMUNICATIONS            23,877          23,877
                    AUTOMATION.
086                COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS           28,001          28,001
                    UNDER $5M.
                   SUBMARINE
                    COMMUNICATIONS
087                SUBMARINE BROADCAST             7,856           7,856
                    SUPPORT.
088                SUBMARINE                      74,376          74,376
                    COMMUNICATION
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   SATELLITE
                    COMMUNICATIONS
089                SATELLITE                      27,381          27,381
                    COMMUNICATIONS
                    SYSTEMS.
090                NAVY MULTIBAND                215,952         215,952
                    TERMINAL (NMT).
                   SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
091                JCS COMMUNICATIONS              4,463           4,463
                    EQUIPMENT.
092                ELECTRICAL POWER                  778             778
                    SYSTEMS.
                   CRYPTOGRAPHIC
                    EQUIPMENT
094                INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY         133,530         133,530
                    PROGRAM (ISSP).
095                MIO INTEL                       1,000           1,000
                    EXPLOITATION TEAM.
                   CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
096                CRYPTOLOGIC                    12,251          12,251
                    COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP.
                   OTHER ELECTRONIC
                    SUPPORT
097                COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT           2,893           2,893
                   SONOBUOYS
099                SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES.         179,927         179,927
                   AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
100                WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT          55,279          55,279
                    EQUIPMENT.
101                EXPEDITIONARY                   8,792           8,792
                    AIRFIELDS.
102                AIRCRAFT REARMING              11,364          11,364
                    EQUIPMENT.
103                AIRCRAFT LAUNCH &              59,502          59,502
                    RECOVERY EQUIPMENT.
104                METEOROLOGICAL                 19,118          19,118
                    EQUIPMENT.
105                DCRS/DPL.............           1,425           1,425
106                AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT          29,670          29,670
107                AIRBORNE MINE                 101,554         101,554
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
108                LAMPS MK III                   18,293          18,293
                    SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT.
109                PORTABLE ELECTRONIC             7,969           7,969
                    MAINTENANCE AIDS.
110                OTHER AVIATION                  5,215           5,215
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
111                AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS             4,827           4,827
                    INFORMATION SYSTEM
                    (ALIS).
                   SHIP GUN SYSTEM
                    EQUIPMENT
112                NAVAL FIRES CONTROL             1,188           1,188
                    SYSTEM.
113                GUN FIRE CONTROL                4,447           4,447
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS
                    EQUIPMENT
114                NATO SEASPARROW......          58,368          58,368
115                RAM GMLS.............             491             491
116                SHIP SELF DEFENSE              51,858          51,858
                    SYSTEM.
117                AEGIS SUPPORT                  59,757          59,757
                    EQUIPMENT.
118                TOMAHAWK SUPPORT               71,559          71,559
                    EQUIPMENT.
119                VERTICAL LAUNCH                   626             626
                    SYSTEMS.
120                MARITIME INTEGRATED             2,779           2,779
                    PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS.
                   FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
121                STRATEGIC MISSILE             224,484         198,565
                    SYSTEMS EQUIP.
                       New START treaty                        [-25,919]
                       implementation.
                   ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
122                SSN COMBAT CONTROL             85,678          85,678
                    SYSTEMS.
123                SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT           3,913           3,913
                    EQUIPMENT.
124                SURFACE ASW SUPPORT             3,909           3,909
                    EQUIPMENT.
125                ASW RANGE SUPPORT              28,694          28,694
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   OTHER ORDNANCE
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126                EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE             46,586          46,586
                    DISPOSAL EQUIP.
127                ITEMS LESS THAN $5             11,933          11,933
                    MILLION.
                   OTHER EXPENDABLE
                    ORDNANCE
128                ANTI-SHIP MISSILE              62,361          62,361
                    DECOY SYSTEM.
129                SURFACE TRAINING               41,813          41,813
                    DEVICE MODS.
130                SUBMARINE TRAINING             26,672          26,672
                    DEVICE MODS.
                   CIVIL ENGINEERING
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
131                PASSENGER CARRYING              5,600           5,600
                    VEHICLES.
132                GENERAL PURPOSE                 3,717           3,717
                    TRUCKS.
133                CONSTRUCTION &                 10,881          10,881
                    MAINTENANCE EQUIP.
134                FIRE FIGHTING                  14,748          14,748
                    EQUIPMENT.
135                TACTICAL VEHICLES....           5,540           5,540
136                AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT.           5,741           5,741
137                POLLUTION CONTROL               3,852           3,852
                    EQUIPMENT.
138                ITEMS UNDER $5                 25,757          25,757
                    MILLION.
139                PHYSICAL SECURITY               1,182           1,182
                    VEHICLES.
                   SUPPLY SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
140                MATERIALS HANDLING             14,250          14,250
                    EQUIPMENT.
141                OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT            6,401           6,401
                    EQUIPMENT.
142                FIRST DESTINATION               5,718           5,718
                    TRANSPORTATION.
143                SPECIAL PURPOSE                22,597          22,597
                    SUPPLY SYSTEMS.
                   TRAINING DEVICES
144                TRAINING SUPPORT               22,527          22,527
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   COMMAND SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT

[[Page 8994]]

 
145                COMMAND SUPPORT                50,428          50,428
                    EQUIPMENT.
146                EDUCATION SUPPORT               2,292           2,292
                    EQUIPMENT.
147                MEDICAL SUPPORT                 4,925           4,925
                    EQUIPMENT.
149                NAVAL MIP SUPPORT               3,202           3,202
                    EQUIPMENT.
151                OPERATING FORCES               24,294          24,294
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
152                C4ISR EQUIPMENT......           4,287           4,287
153                ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT          18,276          18,276
                    EQUIPMENT.
154                PHYSICAL SECURITY             134,495         134,495
                    EQUIPMENT.
155                ENTERPRISE                    324,327         324,327
                    INFORMATION
                    TECHNOLOGY.
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
156A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..          12,140          12,140
                   SPARES AND REPAIR
                    PARTS
157                SPARES AND REPAIR             317,234         316,959
                    PARTS.
                       New START treaty                           [-275]
                       implementation.
                        TOTAL OTHER            6,310,257       6,284,063
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        NAVY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT, MARINE
                    CORPS
                   TRACKED COMBAT
                    VEHICLES
001                AAV7A1 PIP...........          32,360          32,360
002                LAV PIP..............           6,003           6,003
                   ARTILLERY AND OTHER
                    WEAPONS
003                EXPEDITIONARY FIRE                589             589
                    SUPPORT SYSTEM.
004                155MM LIGHTWEIGHT               3,655           3,655
                    TOWED HOWITZER.
005                HIGH MOBILITY                   5,467           5,467
                    ARTILLERY ROCKET
                    SYSTEM.
006                WEAPONS AND COMBAT             20,354          20,354
                    VEHICLES UNDER $5
                    MILLION.
                   OTHER SUPPORT
007                MODIFICATION KITS....          38,446          38,446
008                WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT             4,734           4,734
                    PROGRAM.
                   GUIDED MISSILES
009                GROUND BASED AIR               15,713          15,713
                    DEFENSE.
010                JAVELIN..............          36,175          36,175
012                ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS              1,136           1,136
                    SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-
                    H).
                   OTHER SUPPORT
013                MODIFICATION KITS....          33,976          33,976
                   COMMAND AND CONTROL
                    SYSTEMS
014                UNIT OPERATIONS                16,273          16,273
                    CENTER.
                   REPAIR AND TEST
                    EQUIPMENT
015                REPAIR AND TEST                41,063          41,063
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
016                COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM           2,930           2,930
                   COMMAND AND CONTROL
                    SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
018                ITEMS UNDER $5                  1,637           1,637
                    MILLION (COMM &
                    ELEC).
019                AIR OPERATIONS C2              18,394          18,394
                    SYSTEMS.
                   RADAR + EQUIPMENT
                    (NON-TEL)
020                RADAR SYSTEMS........         114,051         114,051
021                RQ-21 UAS............          66,612          66,612
                   INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
                    (NON-TEL)
022                FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM..           3,749           3,749
023                INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT           75,979          75,979
                    EQUIPMENT.
026                RQ-11 UAV............           1,653           1,653
027                DCGS-MC..............           9,494           9,494
                   OTHER COMM/ELEC
                    EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
028                NIGHT VISION                    6,171           6,171
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
                    TEL)
029                COMMON COMPUTER               121,955         121,955
                    RESOURCES.
030                COMMAND POST SYSTEMS.          83,294          83,294
031                RADIO SYSTEMS........          74,718          74,718
032                COMM SWITCHING &               47,613          47,613
                    CONTROL SYSTEMS.
033                COMM & ELEC                    19,573          19,573
                    INFRASTRUCTURE
                    SUPPORT.
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
033A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..           5,659           5,659
                   ADMINISTRATIVE
                    VEHICLES
034                COMMERCIAL PASSENGER            1,039           1,039
                    VEHICLES.
035                COMMERCIAL CARGO               31,050          31,050
                    VEHICLES.
                   TACTICAL VEHICLES
036                5/4T TRUCK HMMWV               36,333          36,333
                    (MYP).
037                MOTOR TRANSPORT                 3,137           3,137
                    MODIFICATIONS.
040                FAMILY OF TACTICAL             27,385          27,385
                    TRAILERS.
                   OTHER SUPPORT
041                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              7,016           7,016
                    MILLION.
                   ENGINEER AND OTHER
                    EQUIPMENT
042                ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL          14,377          14,377
                    EQUIP ASSORT.
043                BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT          24,864          24,864
044                TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS          21,592          21,592
045                POWER EQUIPMENT                61,353          61,353
                    ASSORTED.
046                AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT              4,827           4,827
                    EQUIPMENT.
047                EOD SYSTEMS..........          40,011          40,011
                   MATERIALS HANDLING
                    EQUIPMENT
048                PHYSICAL SECURITY              16,809          16,809
                    EQUIPMENT.

[[Page 8995]]

 
049                GARRISON MOBILE                 3,408           3,408
                    ENGINEER EQUIPMENT
                    (GMEE).
050                MATERIAL HANDLING              48,549          48,549
                    EQUIP.
051                FIRST DESTINATION                 190             190
                    TRANSPORTATION.
                   GENERAL PROPERTY
052                FIELD MEDICAL                  23,129          23,129
                    EQUIPMENT.
053                TRAINING DEVICES.....           8,346           8,346
054                CONTAINER FAMILY.....           1,857           1,857
055                FAMILY OF                      36,198          36,198
                    CONSTRUCTION
                    EQUIPMENT.
056                RAPID DEPLOYABLE                2,390           2,390
                    KITCHEN.
                   OTHER SUPPORT
057                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              6,525           6,525
                    MILLION.
                   SPARES AND REPAIR
                    PARTS
058                SPARES AND REPAIR              13,700          13,700
                    PARTS.
                        TOTAL                  1,343,511       1,343,511
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        MARINE CORPS.
 
                   AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                    AIR FORCE
                   TACTICAL FORCES
001                F-35.................       3,060,770       3,060,770
002                   ADVANCE                    363,783         363,783
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
                   OTHER AIRLIFT
005                C-130J...............         537,517         537,517
006                   ADVANCE                    162,000         162,000
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
007                HC-130J..............         132,121         132,121
008                   ADVANCE                     88,000          88,000
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
009                MC-130J..............         389,434         389,434
010                   ADVANCE                    104,000         104,000
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
                   HELICOPTERS
015                CV-22 (MYP)..........         230,798         230,798
                   MISSION SUPPORT
                    AIRCRAFT
017                CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C.           2,541           2,541
                   OTHER AIRCRAFT
020                TARGET DRONES........         138,669         138,669
022                AC-130J..............         470,019         470,019
024                RQ-4.................          27,000          27,000
027                MQ-9.................         272,217         352,217
                       Program increase.                        [80,000]
028                RQ-4 BLOCK 40 PROC...           1,747           1,747
                   STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
029                B-2A.................          20,019          20,019
030                B-1B.................         132,222         132,222
031                B-52.................         111,002         110,502
                       B-52 conversions                           [-500]
                       related to New
                       START treaty
                       implementation.
032                LARGE AIRCRAFT                 27,197          27,197
                    INFRARED
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
                   TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
033                A-10.................          47,598          47,598
034                F-15.................         354,624         354,624
035                F-16.................          11,794          11,794
036                F-22A................         285,830         285,830
037                F-35 MODIFICATIONS...         157,777         157,777
                   AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
038                C-5..................           2,456           2,456
039                C-5M.................       1,021,967       1,021,967
042                C-17A................         143,197         143,197
043                C-21.................             103             103
044                C-32A................           9,780           9,780
045                C-37A................             452             452
046                C-130 AMP............                          47,300
                       LRIP Kit                                 [47,300]
                       Procurement.
                   TRAINER AIRCRAFT
047                GLIDER MODS..........             128             128
048                T-6..................           6,427           6,427
049                T-1..................             277             277
050                T-38.................          28,686          28,686
                   OTHER AIRCRAFT
052                U-2 MODS.............          45,591          45,591
053                KC-10A (ATCA)........          70,918          70,918
054                C-12.................           1,876           1,876
055                MC-12W...............           5,000           5,000
056                C-20 MODS............             192             192
057                VC-25A MOD...........             263             263
058                C-40.................           6,119           6,119
059                C-130................          58,577          74,277
                       C-130H Propulsion                        [15,700]
                       System Engine
                       Upgrades.
061                C-130J MODS..........          10,475          10,475
062                C-135................          46,556          46,556
063                COMPASS CALL MODS....          34,494          34,494
064                RC-135...............         171,813         171,813
065                E-3..................         197,087         197,087
066                E-4..................          14,304          14,304

[[Page 8996]]

 
067                E-8..................          57,472          57,472
068                H-1..................           6,627           6,627
069                H-60.................          27,654          27,654
070                RQ-4 MODS............           9,313           9,313
071                HC/MC-130                      16,300          16,300
                    MODIFICATIONS.
072                OTHER AIRCRAFT.......           6,948           6,948
073                MQ-1 MODS............           9,734           9,734
074                MQ-9 MODS............         102,970         102,970
076                RQ-4 GSRA/CSRA MODS..          30,000          30,000
077                CV-22 MODS...........          23,310          23,310
                   AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
                    REPAIR PARTS
078                INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR         463,285         639,285
                    PARTS.
                       F100-229 spare                          [165,000]
                       engine shortfall.
                       MQ-9 spares......                        [11,000]
                   COMMON SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
079                AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT           49,140          49,140
                    SUPPORT EQUIP.
                   POST PRODUCTION
                    SUPPORT
081                B-1..................           3,683           3,683
083                B-2A.................          43,786          43,786
084                B-52.................           7,000           7,000
087                C-17A................          81,952          81,952
089                C-135................           8,597           8,597
090                F-15.................           2,403           2,403
091                F-16.................           3,455           3,455
092                F-22A................           5,911           5,911
                   INDUSTRIAL
                    PREPAREDNESS
094                INDUSTRIAL                     21,148          21,148
                    RESPONSIVENESS.
                   WAR CONSUMABLES
095                WAR CONSUMABLES......          94,947          94,947
                   OTHER PRODUCTION
                    CHARGES
096                OTHER PRODUCTION            1,242,004       1,242,004
                    CHARGES.
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
101A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..          75,845          67,545
                       Program Decrease.                        [-8,300]
                        TOTAL AIRCRAFT        11,398,901      11,709,101
                        PROCUREMENT, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
                    AIR FORCE
                   MISSILE REPLACEMENT
                    EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
001                MISSILE REPLACEMENT            39,104          39,104
                    EQ-BALLISTIC.
                   TACTICAL
002                JASSM................         291,151         291,151
003                SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X)..         119,904         119,904
004                AMRAAM...............         340,015         340,015
005                PREDATOR HELLFIRE              48,548          48,548
                    MISSILE.
006                SMALL DIAMETER BOMB..          42,347          42,347
                   INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
007                INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/             752             752
                    POL PREVENTION.
                   CLASS IV
009                MM III MODIFICATIONS.          21,635          21,635
010                AGM-65D MAVERICK.....             276             276
011                AGM-88A HARM.........             580             580
012                AIR LAUNCH CRUISE               6,888           6,888
                    MISSILE (ALCM).
013                SMALL DIAMETER BOMB..           5,000           5,000
                   MISSILE SPARES AND
                    REPAIR PARTS
014                INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR          72,080          71,377
                    PARTS.
                       Spares and repair                          [-703]
                       parts related to
                       New START treaty
                       implementation.
                   SPACE PROGRAMS
015                ADVANCED EHF.........         379,586         379,586
016                WIDEBAND GAPFILLER             38,398          38,398
                    SATELLITES(SPACE).
017                GPS III SPACE SEGMENT         403,431         403,431
018                   ADVANCE                     74,167          74,167
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
019                SPACEBORNE EQUIP                5,244           5,244
                    (COMSEC).
020                GLOBAL POSITIONING             55,997          55,997
                    (SPACE).
021                DEF METEOROLOGICAL             95,673          95,673
                    SAT PROG(SPACE).
022                EVOLVED EXPENDABLE          1,852,900       1,852,900
                    LAUNCH VEH(SPACE).
023                SBIR HIGH (SPACE)....         583,192         583,192
                   SPECIAL PROGRAMS
029                SPECIAL UPDATE                 36,716          36,716
                    PROGRAMS.
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
029A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..         829,702         829,702
                        TOTAL MISSILE          5,343,286       5,342,583
                        PROCUREMENT, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF
                    AMMUNITION, AIR
                    FORCE
                   ROCKETS
001                ROCKETS..............          15,735          15,735
                   CARTRIDGES
002                CARTRIDGES...........         129,921         129,921
                   BOMBS
003                PRACTICE BOMBS.......          30,840          30,840

[[Page 8997]]

 
004                GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS         187,397         187,397
005                JOINT DIRECT ATTACK           188,510         188,510
                    MUNITION.
                   OTHER ITEMS
006                CAD/PAD..............          35,837          35,837
007                EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE              7,531           7,531
                    DISPOSAL (EOD).
008                SPARES AND REPAIR                 499             499
                    PARTS.
009                MODIFICATIONS........             480             480
010                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              9,765           9,765
                    MILLION.
                   FLARES
011                FLARES...............          55,864          55,864
                   FUZES
013                FUZES................          76,037          76,037
                   SMALL ARMS
014                SMALL ARMS...........          21,026          21,026
                        TOTAL                    759,442         759,442
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        AMMUNITION, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                    AIR FORCE
                   PASSENGER CARRYING
                    VEHICLES
001                PASSENGER CARRYING              2,048           2,048
                    VEHICLES.
                   CARGO AND UTILITY
                    VEHICLES
002                MEDIUM TACTICAL                 8,019           8,019
                    VEHICLE.
003                CAP VEHICLES.........             946             946
004                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              7,138           7,138
                    MILLION.
                   SPECIAL PURPOSE
                    VEHICLES
005                SECURITY AND TACTICAL          13,093          13,093
                    VEHICLES.
006                ITEMS LESS THAN $5             13,983          13,983
                    MILLION.
                   FIRE FIGHTING
                    EQUIPMENT
007                FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH            23,794          23,794
                    RESCUE VEHICLES.
                   MATERIALS HANDLING
                    EQUIPMENT
008                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              8,669           8,669
                    MILLION.
                   BASE MAINTENANCE
                    SUPPORT
009                RUNWAY SNOW REMOV &             6,144           6,144
                    CLEANING EQUIP.
010                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              1,580           1,580
                    MILLION.
                   COMM SECURITY
                    EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
012                COMSEC EQUIPMENT.....         149,661         149,661
013                MODIFICATIONS                     726             726
                    (COMSEC).
                   INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
014                INTELLIGENCE TRAINING           2,789           2,789
                    EQUIPMENT.
015                INTELLIGENCE COMM              31,875          31,875
                    EQUIPMENT.
016                ADVANCE TECH SENSORS.             452             452
017                MISSION PLANNING               14,203          14,203
                    SYSTEMS.
                   ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
018                AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL &          46,232          46,232
                    LANDING SYS.
019                NATIONAL AIRSPACE              11,685          11,685
                    SYSTEM.
020                BATTLE CONTROL                 19,248          19,248
                    SYSTEM--FIXED.
021                THEATER AIR CONTROL            19,292          19,292
                    SYS IMPROVEMENTS.
022                WEATHER OBSERVATION            17,166          17,166
                    FORECAST.
023                STRATEGIC COMMAND AND          22,723          22,723
                    CONTROL.
024                CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN              27,930          27,930
                    COMPLEX.
025                TAC SIGNIT SPT.......             217             217
                   SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS
                    PROJECTS
027                GENERAL INFORMATION            49,627          49,627
                    TECHNOLOGY.
028                AF GLOBAL COMMAND &            13,559          13,559
                    CONTROL SYS.
029                MOBILITY COMMAND AND           11,186          11,186
                    CONTROL.
030                AIR FORCE PHYSICAL             43,238          43,238
                    SECURITY SYSTEM.
031                COMBAT TRAINING                10,431          10,431
                    RANGES.
032                C3 COUNTERMEASURES...          13,769          13,769
033                GCSS-AF FOS..........          19,138          19,138
034                THEATER BATTLE MGT C2           8,809           8,809
                    SYSTEM.
035                AIR & SPACE                    26,935          26,935
                    OPERATIONS CTR-WPN
                    SYS.
                   AIR FORCE
                    COMMUNICATIONS
036                INFORMATION TRANSPORT          80,558          80,558
                    SYSTEMS.
038                AFNET................          97,588          97,588
039                VOICE SYSTEMS........           8,419           8,419
040                USCENTCOM............          34,276          34,276
                   SPACE PROGRAMS
041                SPACE BASED IR SENSOR          28,235          28,235
                    PGM SPACE.
042                NAVSTAR GPS SPACE....           2,061           2,061
043                NUDET DETECTION SYS             4,415           4,415
                    SPACE.
044                AF SATELLITE CONTROL           30,237          30,237
                    NETWORK SPACE.
045                SPACELIFT RANGE                98,062          98,062
                    SYSTEM SPACE.
046                MILSATCOM SPACE......         105,935         105,935
047                SPACE MODS SPACE.....          37,861          37,861
048                COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM..           7,171           7,171
                   ORGANIZATION AND BASE
049                TACTICAL C-E                   83,537          83,537
                    EQUIPMENT.
050                COMBAT SURVIVOR                11,884          11,884
                    EVADER LOCATER.
051                RADIO EQUIPMENT......          14,711          14,711
052                CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL               10,275          10,275
                    EQUIPMENT.

[[Page 8998]]

 
053                BASE COMM                      50,907          50,907
                    INFRASTRUCTURE.
                   MODIFICATIONS
054                COMM ELECT MODS......          55,701          55,701
                   PERSONAL SAFETY &
                    RESCUE EQUIP
055                NIGHT VISION GOGGLES.          14,524          14,524
056                ITEMS LESS THAN $5             28,655          28,655
                    MILLION.
                   DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS
                    HANDLING EQ
057                MECHANIZED MATERIAL             9,332           9,332
                    HANDLING EQUIP.
                   BASE SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
058                BASE PROCURED                  16,762          16,762
                    EQUIPMENT.
059                CONTINGENCY                    33,768          33,768
                    OPERATIONS.
060                PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL            2,495           2,495
                    INVESTMENT.
061                MOBILITY EQUIPMENT...          12,859          12,859
062                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              1,954           1,954
                    MILLION.
                   SPECIAL SUPPORT
                    PROJECTS
064                DARP RC135...........          24,528          24,528
065                DCGS-AF..............         137,819         137,819
067                SPECIAL UPDATE                479,586         479,586
                    PROGRAM.
068                DEFENSE SPACE                  45,159          45,159
                    RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..      14,519,256      14,519,256
                   SPARES AND REPAIR
                    PARTS
069                SPARES AND REPAIR              25,746          25,746
                    PARTS.
                        TOTAL OTHER           16,760,581      16,760,581
                        PROCUREMENT, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
                    WIDE
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
038                MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD.          37,345          37,345
039                MAJOR EQUIPMENT,               16,678          16,678
                    INTELLIGENCE.
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
037                INFORMATION SYSTEMS            14,363          14,363
                    SECURITY PROGRAM
                    (ISSP).
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
041                MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS.          35,259          35,259
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
008                INFORMATION SYSTEMS            16,189          16,189
                    SECURITY.
011                TELEPORT PROGRAM.....          66,075          66,075
012                ITEMS LESS THAN $5             83,881          83,881
                    MILLION.
013                NET CENTRIC                     2,572           2,572
                    ENTERPRISE SERVICES
                    (NCES).
014                DEFENSE INFORMATION           125,557         125,557
                    SYSTEM NETWORK.
016                CYBER SECURITY                 16,941          16,941
                    INITIATIVE.
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
017                MAJOR EQUIPMENT......          13,137          13,137
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
021                MAJOR EQUIPMENT......           5,020           5,020
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
001                ITEMS LESS THAN $5              1,291           1,291
                    MILLION.
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
040                MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS.          14,792          14,792
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                    MISSILE DEFENSE
                    AGENCY
025                THAAD................         581,005         581,005
026                AEGIS BMD............         580,814         580,814
027                BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS.          62,000          62,000
028                AEGIS ASHORE PHASE            131,400         131,400
                    III.
030                IRON DOME............         220,309         220,309
032                   ADVANCE                                    107,000
                      PROCUREMENT (CY).
                       Advanced                                [107,000]
                       Procurement of 14
                       GBIs, beginning
                       with booster
                       motor sets.
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
003                PERSONNEL                      47,201          47,201
                    ADMINISTRATION.
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                    DEFENSE THREAT
                    REDUCTION AGENCY
022                VEHICLES.............             100             100
023                OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT          13,395          13,395
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                    DEFENSE SECURITY
                    COOPERATION AGENCY
020                EQUIPMENT............             978             978
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                    DODEA
019                AUTOMATION/                     1,454           1,454
                    EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT
                    & LOGISTICS.
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
002                MAJOR EQUIPMENT......           5,711           5,711
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
                    DMACT
018                MAJOR EQUIPMENT......          15,414          15,414
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
041A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..         544,272         544,272
                   AVIATION PROGRAMS
043                ROTARY WING UPGRADES          112,456         112,456
                    AND SUSTAINMENT.
044                MH-60 MODERNIZATION            81,457          81,457
                    PROGRAM.
045                NON-STANDARD AVIATION           2,650           2,650
046                U-28.................          56,208          56,208
047                MH-47 CHINOOK........          19,766          19,766
048                RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL             850             850
                    VEHICLE.
049                CV-22 MODIFICATION...          98,927          98,927

[[Page 8999]]

 
050                MQ-1 UNMANNED AERIAL           20,576          20,576
                    VEHICLE.
051                MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL            1,893           1,893
                    VEHICLE.
053                STUASL0..............          13,166          13,166
054                PRECISION STRIKE              107,687         107,687
                    PACKAGE.
055                AC/MC-130J...........          51,870          51,870
057                C-130 MODIFICATIONS..          71,940          71,940
                   SHIPBUILDING
059                UNDERWATER SYSTEMS...          37,439          37,439
                   AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
061                ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M..         159,029         159,029
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT
                    PROGRAMS
064                INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.          79,819          79,819
066                DISTRIBUTED COMMON             14,906          14,906
                    GROUND/SURFACE
                    SYSTEMS.
068                OTHER ITEMS <$5M.....          81,711          81,711
069                COMBATANT CRAFT                35,053          35,053
                    SYSTEMS.
072                SPECIAL PROGRAMS.....          41,526          41,526
073                TACTICAL VEHICLES....          43,353          43,353
074                WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M.         210,540         210,540
076                COMBAT MISSION                 20,000          20,000
                    REQUIREMENTS.
080                GLOBAL VIDEO                    6,645           6,645
                    SURVEILLANCE
                    ACTIVITIES.
081                OPERATIONAL                    25,581          25,581
                    ENHANCEMENTS
                    INTELLIGENCE.
087                OPERATIONAL                   191,061         191,061
                    ENHANCEMENTS.
                   CBDP
089                INSTALLATION FORCE             14,271          14,271
                    PROTECTION.
090                INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION         101,667         101,667
092                JOINT BIO DEFENSE              13,447          13,447
                    PROGRAM (MEDICAL).
093                COLLECTIVE PROTECTION          20,896          20,896
094                CONTAMINATION                 144,540         144,540
                    AVOIDANCE.
                        TOTAL                  4,534,083       4,641,083
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        DEFENSE-WIDE.
 
                   JOINT URGENT
                    OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                    FUND
                   JOINT URGENT
                    OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                    FUND
001                JOINT URGENT                   98,800               0
                    OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                    FUND.
                       Program reduction                       [-98,800]
                        TOTAL JOINT               98,800               0
                        URGENT
                        OPERATIONAL
                        NEEDS FUND.
 
                        TOTAL                 98,227,168      99,666,171
                        PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands
                               of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2014          House
       Line                 Item              Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                    ARMY
                   FIXED WING
001A               SATURN ARCH (MIP)....          48,000          48,000
003                MQ-1 UAV.............          31,988          31,988
                   ROTARY
008                AH-64 APACHE BLOCK            142,000         142,000
                    IIIB NEW BUILD.
010                KIOWA WARRIOR WRA....         163,800         163,800
013                CH-47 HELICOPTER.....         386,000         386,000
                        TOTAL AIRCRAFT           771,788         771,788
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        ARMY.
 
                   MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
                    ARMY
                   SURFACE-TO-AIR
                    MISSILE SYSTEM
002                MSE MISSILE..........                          25,887
                       Restoral of funds                        [25,887]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   AIR-TO-SURFACE
                    MISSILE SYSTEM
003                HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY.          54,000          54,000
                   ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
                    MISSILE SYS
007                GUIDED MLRS ROCKET             39,045          39,045
                    (GMLRS).
009A               ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS          35,600          35,600
                    (ATACMS)--SYS SUM.
                        TOTAL MISSILE            128,645         154,532
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        ARMY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
                    ARMY
                   MOD OF WEAPONS AND
                    OTHER COMBAT VEH
033                M16 RIFLE MODS.......                          15,422
                       Restoral of funds                        [15,422]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                        TOTAL                                     15,422
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        W&TCV, ARMY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF
                    AMMUNITION, ARMY
                   SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
                    AMMUNITION
002                CTG, 5.56MM, ALL                4,400           4,400
                    TYPES.
004                CTG, HANDGUN, ALL               1,500           1,500
                    TYPES.

[[Page 9000]]

 
005                CTG, .50 CAL, ALL               5,000          10,000
                    TYPES.
                       Restoral of funds                         [5,000]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
008                CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES.          60,000          60,000
                   MORTAR AMMUNITION
010                60MM MORTAR, ALL                5,000           5,000
                    TYPES.
                   ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
014                ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES,          10,000          30,000
                    75MM & 105MM, ALL
                    TYPES.
                       Restoral of funds                        [20,000]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
015                ARTILLERY PROJECTILE,          10,000          10,000
                    155MM, ALL TYPES.
016                PROJ 155MM EXTENDED            11,000          11,000
                    RANGE M982.
                   MINES
018                MINES & CLEARING                                9,482
                    CHARGES, ALL TYPES.
                       Restoral of funds                         [9,482]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   ROCKETS
021                ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL          57,000          57,000
                    TYPES.
                   OTHER AMMUNITION
022                DEMOLITION MUNITIONS,           4,000           4,000
                    ALL TYPES.
023                GRENADES, ALL TYPES..           3,000           3,000
024                SIGNALS, ALL TYPES...           8,000           8,000
                   MISCELLANEOUS
028                CAD/PAD ALL TYPES....           2,000           2,000
                        TOTAL                    180,900         215,382
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        AMMUNITION, ARMY.
 
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                    ARMY
                   TACTICAL VEHICLES
003                FAMILY OF MEDIUM                                2,500
                    TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
                       Restoral of funds                         [2,500]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
005                FAMILY OF HEAVY                                 2,050
                    TACTICAL VEHICLES
                    (FHTV).
                       Restoral of funds                         [2,050]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
013                MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-        321,040         562,596
                    PROTECTED (MRAP)
                    MODS.
                       Restoral of funds                       [241,556]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   COMM--BASE
                    COMMUNICATIONS
060                INSTALLATION INFO              25,000          25,000
                    INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
                    PROGRAM.
                   ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
                    REL ACT (TIARA)
067                DCGS-A (MIP).........           7,200           7,200
071                CI HUMINT AUTO                  5,980           5,980
                    REPRTING AND
                    COLL(CHARCS).
                   ELECT EQUIP--
                    ELECTRONIC WARFARE
                    (EW)
074                LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER            57,800          83,255
                    MORTAR RADAR.
                       Restoral of funds                        [25,455]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
078                FAMILY OF PERSISTENT           15,300          15,300
                    SURVEILLANCE
                    CAPABILITIE.
079                COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/            4,221           4,221
                    SECURITY
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
                   ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
                    SURV. (TAC SURV)
091                ARTILLERY ACCURACY              1,834           1,834
                    EQUIP.
093                MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP                             8,400
                    (FIREFINDER RADARS).
                       Restoral of funds                         [8,400]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
096                MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP            21,000          21,000
                    (LLDR).
098                COUNTERFIRE RADARS...          85,830          85,830
                   ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
                    C2 SYSTEMS
110                MANEUVER CONTROL                                3,200
                    SYSTEM (MCS).
                       Restoral of funds                         [3,200]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
112                SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS                           5,160
                    ENTERPRISE (SALE).
                       Restoral of funds                         [5,160]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
                    EQUIPMENT
126                FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL                           15,000
                    EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
                       Restoral of funds                        [15,000]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
127                BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS                           24,932
                    (BDS).
                       Restoral of funds                        [24,932]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   ENGINEER (NON-
                    CONSTRUCTION)
                    EQUIPMENT
137                EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE                              3,565
                    DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
                    EQPMT).
                       Restoral of funds                         [3,565]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   COMBAT SERVICE
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
146                FORCE PROVIDER.......          51,654          51,654
147                FIELD FEEDING                   6,264           6,264
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
152                DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS,                           2,119
                    PETROLEUM & WATER.
                       Restoral of funds                         [2,119]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                   TRAINING EQUIPMENT
176                COMBAT TRAINING                                 7,000
                    CENTERS SUPPORT.
                       Restoral of funds                         [7,000]
                       based on offsets
                       used for April
                       2013
                       reprogramming.
                        TOTAL OTHER              603,123         944,060
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        ARMY.
 
                   JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE
                    DEV DEFEAT FUND
                   NETWORK ATTACK
001                ATTACK THE NETWORK...         417,700         417,700
                   JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT
002                DEFEAT THE DEVICE....         248,886         248,886
                   FORCE TRAINING
003                TRAIN THE FORCE......         106,000         106,000
                   STAFF AND
                    INFRASTRUCTURE

[[Page 9001]]

 
004                OPERATIONS...........         227,414         227,414
                        TOTAL JOINT IMPR       1,000,000       1,000,000
                        EXPLOSIVE DEV
                        DEFEAT FUND.
 
                   AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                    NAVY
                   COMBAT AIRCRAFT
011                H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/           29,520          29,520
                    AH-1Z).
                   OTHER AIRCRAFT
026                MQ-8 UAV.............          13,100          13,100
                   MODIFICATION OF
                    AIRCRAFT
031                AV-8 SERIES..........          57,652          57,652
033                F-18 SERIES..........          35,500          35,500
039                EP-3 SERIES..........           2,700           2,700
049                SPECIAL PROJECT                 3,375           3,375
                    AIRCRAFT.
054                COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT.          49,183          49,183
055                COMMON AVIONICS                 4,190           4,190
                    CHANGES.
059                MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION          20,700          20,700
                   AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
                    REPAIR PARTS
065                SPARES AND REPAIR              24,776          24,776
                    PARTS.
                        TOTAL AIRCRAFT           240,696         240,696
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        NAVY.
 
                   WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
                    NAVY
                   TACTICAL MISSILES
009                HELLFIRE.............          27,000          27,000
009A               LASER MAVERICK.......          58,000          58,000
010                STAND OFF PRECISION             1,500           1,500
                    GUIDED MUNITIONS
                    (SOPGM).
                        TOTAL WEAPONS             86,500          86,500
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        NAVY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
                    NAVY & MC
                   NAVY AMMUNITION
001                GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS          11,424          11,424
002                AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL          30,332          30,332
                    TYPES.
003                MACHINE GUN                     8,282           8,282
                    AMMUNITION.
006                AIR EXPENDABLE                 31,884          31,884
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
011                OTHER SHIP GUN                    409             409
                    AMMUNITION.
012                SMALL ARMS & LANDING           11,976          11,976
                    PARTY AMMO.
013                PYROTECHNIC AND                 2,447           2,447
                    DEMOLITION.
014                AMMUNITION LESS THAN            7,692           7,692
                    $5 MILLION.
                   MARINE CORPS
                    AMMUNITION
015                SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION          13,461          13,461
016                LINEAR CHARGES, ALL             3,310           3,310
                    TYPES.
017                40 MM, ALL TYPES.....           6,244           6,244
018                60MM, ALL TYPES......           3,368           3,368
019                81MM, ALL TYPES......           9,162           9,162
020                120MM, ALL TYPES.....          10,266          10,266
021                CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES..           1,887           1,887
022                GRENADES, ALL TYPES..           1,611           1,611
023                ROCKETS, ALL TYPES...          37,459          37,459
024                ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES.             970             970
025                DEMOLITION MUNITIONS,             418             418
                    ALL TYPES.
026                FUZE, ALL TYPES......          14,219          14,219
                        TOTAL                    206,821         206,821
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        AMMO, NAVY & MC.
 
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                    NAVY
                   CIVIL ENGINEERING
                    SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
135                TACTICAL VEHICLES....          17,968          17,968
                        TOTAL OTHER               17,968          17,968
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        NAVY.
 
                   PROCUREMENT, MARINE
                    CORPS
                   GUIDED MISSILES
010                JAVELIN..............          29,334          29,334
011                FOLLOW ON TO SMAW....             105             105
                   OTHER SUPPORT
013                MODIFICATION KITS....          16,081          16,081
                   REPAIR AND TEST
                    EQUIPMENT
015                REPAIR AND TEST                16,081          16,081
                    EQUIPMENT.
                   OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
017                MODIFICATION KITS....           2,831           2,831
                   COMMAND AND CONTROL
                    SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
018                ITEMS UNDER $5                  8,170           8,170
                    MILLION (COMM &
                    ELEC).
                   INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
                    (NON-TEL)
023                INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT            2,700           2,700
                    EQUIPMENT.
026                RQ-11 UAV............           2,830           2,830
                   OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
                    TEL)
029                COMMON COMPUTER                 4,866           4,866
                    RESOURCES.
030                COMMAND POST SYSTEMS.             265             265
                   ENGINEER AND OTHER
                    EQUIPMENT
042                ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL             114             114
                    EQUIP ASSORT.
043                BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT             523             523
044                TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS             365             365

[[Page 9002]]

 
045                POWER EQUIPMENT                 2,004           2,004
                    ASSORTED.
047                EOD SYSTEMS..........          42,930          42,930
                   GENERAL PROPERTY
055                FAMILY OF                         385             385
                    CONSTRUCTION
                    EQUIPMENT.
                        TOTAL                    129,584         129,584
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        MARINE CORPS.
 
                   AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
                    AIR FORCE
                   STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
032                LARGE AIRCRAFT                 94,050          94,050
                    INFRARED
                    COUNTERMEASURES.
                   OTHER AIRCRAFT
052                U-2 MODS.............          11,300          11,300
059                C-130................           1,618           1,618
064                RC-135...............           2,700           2,700
                   COMMON SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
079                AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT            6,000           6,000
                    SUPPORT EQUIP.
                        TOTAL AIRCRAFT           115,668         115,668
                        PROCUREMENT, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
                    AIR FORCE
                   TACTICAL
005                PREDATOR HELLFIRE              24,200          24,200
                    MISSILE.
                        TOTAL MISSILE             24,200          24,200
                        PROCUREMENT, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   PROCUREMENT OF
                    AMMUNITION, AIR
                    FORCE
                   ROCKETS
001                ROCKETS..............             326             326
                   CARTRIDGES
002                CARTRIDGES...........          17,634          17,634
                   BOMBS
004                GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS          37,514          37,514
005                JOINT DIRECT ATTACK            84,459          84,459
                    MUNITION.
                   FLARES
011                FLARES...............          14,973          14,973
012                FUZES................           3,859           3,859
                   SMALL ARMS
014                SMALL ARMS...........           1,200           1,200
                        TOTAL                    159,965         159,965
                        PROCUREMENT OF
                        AMMUNITION, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT,
                    AIR FORCE
                   ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
022                WEATHER OBSERVATION             1,800           1,800
                    FORECAST.
                   SPACE PROGRAMS
046                MILSATCOM SPACE......           5,695           5,695
                   BASE SUPPORT
                    EQUIPMENT
059                CONTINGENCY                    60,600          60,600
                    OPERATIONS.
061                MOBILITY EQUIPMENT...          68,000          68,000
                   SPECIAL SUPPORT
                    PROJECTS
068                DEFENSE SPACE                  58,250          58,250
                    RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
068A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..       2,380,501       2,380,501
                        TOTAL OTHER            2,574,846       2,574,846
                        PROCUREMENT, AIR
                        FORCE.
 
                   PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
                    WIDE
                   MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
011                TELEPORT PROGRAM.....           4,760           4,760
                   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
041A               CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..          78,986          78,986
                   AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
060                ORDNANCE                        2,841           2,841
                    REPLENISHMENT.
                   OTHER PROCUREMENT
                    PROGRAMS
064                INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.          13,300          13,300
082                SOLDIER PROTECTION              8,034           8,034
                    AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS.
087                OPERATIONAL                     3,354           3,354
                    ENHANCEMENTS.
                        TOTAL                    111,275         111,275
                        PROCUREMENT,
                        DEFENSE-WIDE.
 
                   JOINT URGENT
                    OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                    FUND
                   JOINT URGENT
                    OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                    FUND
001                JOINT URGENT                   15,000               0
                    OPERATIONAL NEEDS
                    FUND.
                       Program reduction                       [-15,000]
                        TOTAL JOINT               15,000         -15,000
                        URGENT
                        OPERATIONAL
                        NEEDS FUND.
 
                   NATIONAL GUARD &
                    RESERVE EQUIPMENT
                   UNDISTRIBUTED
999                MISCELLANEOUS                                 400,000
                    EQUIPMENT.
                       Program increase.                       [400,000]
                        TOTAL NATIONAL                           400,000
                        GUARD & RESERVE
                        EQUIPMENT.
 
                        TOTAL                  6,366,979       7,168,707
                        PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 9003]]

        TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

     SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
 SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (In Thousands of
                                Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Program                          FY 2014          House
  Line       Element           Item           Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          ARMY
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601101A        IN-HOUSE                 21,803          21,803
                          LABORATORY
                          INDEPENDENT
                          RESEARCH.
   002   0601102A        DEFENSE                 221,901         221,901
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
   003   0601103A        UNIVERSITY               79,359          79,359
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
   004   0601104A        UNIVERSITY AND          113,662         113,662
                          INDUSTRY
                          RESEARCH
                          CENTERS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             436,725         436,725
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   005   0602105A        MATERIALS                26,585          26,585
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   006   0602120A        SENSORS AND              43,170          43,170
                          ELECTRONIC
                          SURVIVABILITY.
   007   0602122A        TRACTOR HIP....          36,293          36,293
   008   0602211A        AVIATION                 55,615          55,615
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   009   0602270A        ELECTRONIC               17,585          17,585
                          WARFARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   010   0602303A        MISSILE                  51,528          51,528
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   011   0602307A        ADVANCED                 26,162          26,162
                          WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   012   0602308A        ADVANCED                 24,063          24,063
                          CONCEPTS AND
                          SIMULATION.
   013   0602601A        COMBAT VEHICLE           64,589          64,589
                          AND AUTOMOTIVE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   014   0602618A        BALLISTICS               68,300          68,300
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   015   0602622A        CHEMICAL, SMOKE           4,490           4,490
                          AND EQUIPMENT
                          DEFEATING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   016   0602623A        JOINT SERVICE             7,818           7,818
                          SMALL ARMS
                          PROGRAM.
   017   0602624A        WEAPONS AND              37,798          37,798
                          MUNITIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   018   0602705A        ELECTRONICS AND          59,021          59,021
                          ELECTRONIC
                          DEVICES.
   019   0602709A        NIGHT VISION             43,426          43,426
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   020   0602712A        COUNTERMINE              20,574          20,574
                          SYSTEMS.
   021   0602716A        HUMAN FACTORS            21,339          21,339
                          ENGINEERING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   022   0602720A        ENVIRONMENTAL            20,316          20,316
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   023   0602782A        COMMAND,                 34,209          34,209
                          CONTROL,
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   024   0602783A        COMPUTER AND             10,439          10,439
                          SOFTWARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   025   0602784A        MILITARY                 70,064          70,064
                          ENGINEERING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   026   0602785A        MANPOWER/                17,654          17,654
                          PERSONNEL/
                          TRAINING
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   027   0602786A        WARFIGHTER               31,546          31,546
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   028   0602787A        MEDICAL                  93,340          93,340
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             885,924         885,924
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   029   0603001A        WARFIGHTER               56,056          56,056
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   030   0603002A        MEDICAL                  62,032          62,032
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   031   0603003A        AVIATION                 81,080          81,080
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   032   0603004A        WEAPONS AND              63,919          63,919
                          MUNITIONS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   033   0603005A        COMBAT VEHICLE           97,043          97,043
                          AND AUTOMOTIVE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   034   0603006A        SPACE                     5,866           5,866
                          APPLICATION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   035   0603007A        MANPOWER,                 7,800           7,800
                          PERSONNEL AND
                          TRAINING
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   036   0603008A        ELECTRONIC               40,416          40,416
                          WARFARE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   037   0603009A        TRACTOR HIKE...           9,166           9,166
   038   0603015A        NEXT GENERATION          13,627          13,627
                          TRAINING &
                          SIMULATION
                          SYSTEMS.
   039   0603020A        TRACTOR ROSE...          10,667          10,667
   040   0603105A        MILITARY HIV
                          RESEARCH.
   041   0603125A        COMBATING                15,054          15,054
                          TERRORISM--TEC
                          HNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   042   0603130A        TRACTOR NAIL...           3,194           3,194
   043   0603131A        TRACTOR EGGS...           2,367           2,367
   044   0603270A        ELECTRONIC               25,348          25,348
                          WARFARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   045   0603313A        MISSILE AND              64,009          64,009
                          ROCKET
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   046   0603322A        TRACTOR CAGE...          11,083          11,083
   047   0603461A        HIGH                    180,662         180,662
                          PERFORMANCE
                          COMPUTING
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   048   0603606A        LANDMINE                 22,806          22,806
                          WARFARE AND
                          BARRIER
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   049   0603607A        JOINT SERVICE             5,030           5,030
                          SMALL ARMS
                          PROGRAM.
   050   0603710A        NIGHT VISION             36,407          36,407
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   051   0603728A        ENVIRONMENTAL            11,745          11,745
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
   052   0603734A        MILITARY                 23,717          23,717
                          ENGINEERING
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   053   0603772A        ADVANCED                 33,012          33,012
                          TACTICAL
                          COMPUTER
                          SCIENCE AND
                          SENSOR
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             882,106         882,106
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          PROTOTYPES
   054   0603305A        ARMY MISSLE              15,301          15,301
                          DEFENSE
                          SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION.
   055   0603308A        ARMY SPACE               13,592          13,592
                          SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION.
   056   0603619A        LANDMINE                 10,625          10,625
                          WARFARE AND
                          BARRIER--ADV
                          DEV.
   057   0603627A        SMOKE,
                          OBSCURANT AND
                          TARGET
                          DEFEATING SYS-
                          ADV DEV.
   058   0603639A        TANK AND MEDIUM          30,612          30,612
                          CALIBER
                          AMMUNITION.
   059   0603653A        ADVANCED TANK            49,989          49,989
                          ARMAMENT
                          SYSTEM (ATAS).
   060   0603747A        SOLDIER SUPPORT           6,703           6,703
                          AND
                          SURVIVABILITY.
   061   0603766A        TACTICAL                  6,894           6,894
                          ELECTRONIC
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM--ADV
                          DEV.
   062   0603774A        NIGHT VISION              9,066           9,066
                          SYSTEMS
                          ADVANCED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   063   0603779A        ENVIRONMENTAL             2,633           2,633
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY--DE
                          M/VAL.

[[Page 9004]]

 
   064   0603782A        WARFIGHTER              272,384         272,384
                          INFORMATION
                          NETWORK-
                          TACTICAL--DEM/
                          VAL.
   065   0603790A        NATO RESEARCH             3,874           3,874
                          AND
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   066   0603801A        AVIATION--ADV             5,018           5,018
                          DEV.
   067   0603804A        LOGISTICS AND            11,556          11,556
                          ENGINEER
                          EQUIPMENT--ADV
                          DEV.
   068   0603805A        COMBAT SERVICE
                          SUPPORT
                          CONTROL SYSTEM
                          EVALUATION AND
                          ANALYSIS.
   069   0603807A        MEDICAL                  15,603          15,603
                          SYSTEMS--ADV
                          DEV.
   070   0603827A        SOLDIER                  14,159          14,159
                          SYSTEMS--ADVAN
                          CED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   071   0603850A        INTEGRATED                   79              79
                          BROADCAST
                          SERVICE.
   072   0604115A        TECHNOLOGY               55,605          55,605
                          MATURATION
                          INITIATIVES.
   073   0604131A        TRACTOR JUTE...
   074   0604319A        INDIRECT FIRE            79,232          79,232
                          PROTECTION
                          CAPABILITY
                          INCREMENT 2-
                          INTERCEPT
                          (IFPC2).
   075   0604785A        INTEGRATED BASE           4,476           4,476
                          DEFENSE
                          (BUDGET
                          ACTIVITY 4).
   076   0305205A        ENDURANCE UAVS.          28,991             991
         ..............      LEMV                              [-28,000]
                             program
                             reduction.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             636,392         608,392
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            & PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          DEMONSTRATION
   077   0604201A        AIRCRAFT                 76,588          76,588
                          AVIONICS.
   078   0604220A        ARMED,                   73,309          73,309
                          DEPLOYABLE
                          HELOS.
   079   0604270A        ELECTRONIC              154,621         154,621
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   080   0604280A        JOINT TACTICAL           31,826          31,826
                          RADIO.
   081   0604290A        MID-TIER                 23,341          23,341
                          NETWORKING
                          VEHICULAR
                          RADIO (MNVR).
   082   0604321A        ALL SOURCE                4,839           4,839
                          ANALYSIS
                          SYSTEM.
   083   0604328A        TRACTOR CAGE...          23,841          23,841
   084   0604601A        INFANTRY                 79,855          90,855
                          SUPPORT
                          WEAPONS.
         ..............      Transfer                           [11,000]
                             from WTCV
                             line 15--
                             XM25
                             development.
   085   0604604A        MEDIUM TACTICAL           2,140           2,140
                          VEHICLES.
   086   0604611A        JAVELIN........           5,002           5,002
   087   0604622A        FAMILY OF HEAVY          21,321          21,321
                          TACTICAL
                          VEHICLES.
   088   0604633A        AIR TRAFFIC                 514             514
                          CONTROL.
   089   0604641A        TACTICAL
                          UNMANNED
                          GROUND VEHICLE
                          (TUGV).
   090   0604642A        LIGHT TACTICAL
                          WHEELED
                          VEHICLES.
   091   0604661A        FCS SYSTEMS OF
                          SYSTEMS ENGR &
                          PROGRAM MGMT.
   092   0604663A        FCS UNMANNED
                          GROUND
                          VEHICLES.
   093   0604710A        NIGHT VISION             43,405          43,405
                          SYSTEMS--ENG
                          DEV.
   094   0604713A        COMBAT FEEDING,           1,939           1,939
                          CLOTHING, AND
                          EQUIPMENT.
   095   0604715A        NON-SYSTEM               18,980          18,980
                          TRAINING
                          DEVICES--ENG
                          DEV.
   096   0604716A        TERRAIN
                          INFORMATION--E
                          NG DEV.
   097   0604741A        AIR DEFENSE              18,294          18,294
                          COMMAND,
                          CONTROL AND
                          INTELLIGENCE--
                          ENG DEV.
   098   0604742A        CONSTRUCTIVE             17,013          17,013
                          SIMULATION
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   099   0604746A        AUTOMATIC TEST            6,701           6,701
                          EQUIPMENT
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   100   0604760A        DISTRIBUTIVE             14,575          14,575
                          INTERACTIVE
                          SIMULATIONS
                          (DIS)--ENG DEV.
   101   0604780A        COMBINED ARMS            27,634          27,634
                          TACTICAL
                          TRAINER (CATT)
                          CORE.
   102   0604798A        BRIGADE                 193,748         193,748
                          ANALYSIS,
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND EVALUATION.
   103   0604802A        WEAPONS AND              15,721          15,721
                          MUNITIONS--ENG
                          DEV.
   104   0604804A        LOGISTICS AND            41,703          41,703
                          ENGINEER
                          EQUIPMENT--ENG
                          DEV.
   105   0604805A        COMMAND,                  7,379           7,379
                          CONTROL,
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS--ENG
                          DEV.
   106   0604807A        MEDICAL                  39,468          39,468
                          MATERIEL/
                          MEDICAL
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          EQUIPMENT--ENG
                          DEV.
   107   0604808A        LANDMINE                 92,285          92,285
                          WARFARE/
                          BARRIER--ENG
                          DEV.
   108   0604814A        ARTILLERY                 8,209           8,209
                          MUNITIONS--EMD.
   109   0604818A        ARMY TACTICAL            22,958          22,958
                          COMMAND &
                          CONTROL
                          HARDWARE &
                          SOFTWARE.
   110   0604820A        RADAR                     1,549           1,549
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   111   0604822A        GENERAL FUND             17,342          17,342
                          ENTERPRISE
                          BUSINESS
                          SYSTEM (GFEBS).
   112   0604823A        FIREFINDER.....          47,221          47,221
   113   0604827A        SOLDIER                  48,477          48,477
                          SYSTEMS--WARRI
                          OR DEM/VAL.
   114   0604854A        ARTILLERY                80,613          80,613
                          SYSTEMS--EMD.
   115   0604869A        PATRIOT/MEADS
                          COMBINED
                          AGGREGATE
                          PROGRAM (CAP).
   116   0604870A        NUCLEAR ARMS
                          CONTROL
                          MONITORING
                          SENSOR NETWORK.
   117   0605013A        INFORMATION              68,814          68,814
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   118   0605018A        INTEGRATED              137,290         137,290
                          PERSONNEL AND
                          PAY SYSTEM-
                          ARMY (IPPS-A).
   119   0605028A        ARMORED MULTI-          116,298         116,298
                          PURPOSE
                          VEHICLE (AMPV).
   120   0605030A        JOINT TACTICAL           68,148          68,148
                          NETWORK CENTER
                          (JTNC).
   121   0605380A        AMF JOINT                33,219          33,219
                          TACTICAL RADIO
                          SYSTEM (JTRS).
   122   0605450A        JOINT AIR-TO-            15,127          15,127
                          GROUND MISSILE
                          (JAGM).
   123   0605455A        SLAMRAAM.......
   124   0605456A        PAC-3/MSE                68,843          68,843
                          MISSILE.
   125   0605457A        ARMY INTEGRATED         364,649         364,649
                          AIR AND
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          (AIAMD).
   126   0605625A        MANNED GROUND           592,201         592,201
                          VEHICLE.
   127   0605626A        AERIAL COMMON            10,382          10,382
                          SENSOR.
   128   0605766A        NATIONAL                 21,143          21,143
                          CAPABILITIES
                          INTEGRATION
                          (MIP).
   129   0605812A        JOINT LIGHT              84,230          84,230
                          TACTICAL
                          VEHICLE (JLTV)
                          ENGINEERING
                          AND
                          MANUFACTURING
                          DEVELOPMENT PH.
   130   0303032A        TROJAN--RH12...           3,465           3,465
   131   0304270A        ELECTRONIC               10,806          10,806
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           2,857,026       2,868,026
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            &
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  RDT&E
                          MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   132   0604256A        THREAT                   16,934          16,934
                          SIMULATOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   133   0604258A        TARGET SYSTEMS           13,488          13,488
                          DEVELOPMENT.

[[Page 9005]]

 
   134   0604759A        MAJOR T&E                46,672          46,672
                          INVESTMENT.
   135   0605103A        RAND ARROYO              11,919          11,919
                          CENTER.
   136   0605301A        ARMY KWAJALEIN          193,658         193,658
                          ATOLL.
   137   0605326A        CONCEPTS                 37,158          37,158
                          EXPERIMENTATIO
                          N PROGRAM.
   138   0605502A        SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH.
   139   0605601A        ARMY TEST               340,659         340,659
                          RANGES AND
                          FACILITIES.
   140   0605602A        ARMY TECHNICAL           66,061          66,061
                          TEST
                          INSTRUMENTATIO
                          N AND TARGETS.
   141   0605604A        SURVIVABILITY/           43,280          43,280
                          LETHALITY
                          ANALYSIS.
   142   0605605A        DOD HIGH ENERGY
                          LASER TEST
                          FACILITY.
   143   0605606A        AIRCRAFT                  6,025           6,025
                          CERTIFICATION.
   144   0605702A        METEOROLOGICAL            7,349           7,349
                          SUPPORT TO
                          RDT&E
                          ACTIVITIES.
   145   0605706A        MATERIEL                 19,809          19,809
                          SYSTEMS
                          ANALYSIS.
   146   0605709A        EXPLOITATION OF           5,941           5,941
                          FOREIGN ITEMS.
   147   0605712A        SUPPORT OF               55,504          55,504
                          OPERATIONAL
                          TESTING.
   148   0605716A        ARMY EVALUATION          65,274          65,274
                          CENTER.
   149   0605718A        ARMY MODELING &           1,283           1,283
                          SIM X-CMD
                          COLLABORATION
                          & INTEG.
   150   0605801A        PROGRAMWIDE              82,035          82,035
                          ACTIVITIES.
   151   0605803A        TECHNICAL                33,853          33,853
                          INFORMATION
                          ACTIVITIES.
   152   0605805A        MUNITIONS                53,340          53,340
                          STANDARDIZATIO
                          N,
                          EFFECTIVENESS
                          AND SAFETY.
   153   0605857A        ENVIRONMENTAL             5,193           5,193
                          QUALITY
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          MGMT SUPPORT.
   154   0605898A        MANAGEMENT HQ--          54,175          54,175
                          R&D.
   155   0909999A        FINANCING FOR
                          CANCELLED
                          ACCOUNT
                          ADJUSTMENTS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,159,610       1,159,610
                            RDT&E
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
   156   0603778A        MLRS PRODUCT            110,576         110,576
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   157   0607141A        LOGISTICS                 3,717           3,717
                          AUTOMATION.
   158   0607665A        FAMILY OF
                          BIOMETRICS.
   159   0607865A        PATRIOT PRODUCT          70,053          70,053
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   160   0102419A        AEROSTAT JOINT           98,450          68,450
                          PROJECT OFFICE.
         ..............      JLENS                             [-30,000]
                             program
                             reduction.
   161   0203726A        ADV FIELD                30,940          30,940
                          ARTILLERY
                          TACTICAL DATA
                          SYSTEM.
   162   0203735A        COMBAT VEHICLE          177,532         177,532
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAMS.
   163   0203740A        MANEUVER                 36,495          36,495
                          CONTROL SYSTEM.
   164   0203744A        AIRCRAFT                257,187         257,187
                          MODIFICATIONS/
                          PRODUCT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAMS.
   165   0203752A        AIRCRAFT ENGINE             315             315
                          COMPONENT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   166   0203758A        DIGITIZATION...           6,186           6,186
   167   0203801A        MISSILE/AIR               1,578           1,578
                          DEFENSE
                          PRODUCT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   168   0203802A        OTHER MISSILE            62,100          62,100
                          PRODUCT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAMS.
   169   0203808A        TRACTOR CARD...          18,778          18,778
   170   0208053A        JOINT TACTICAL            7,108           7,108
                          GROUND SYSTEM.
   171   0208058A        JOINT HIGH
                          SPEED VESSEL
                          (JHSV).
   173   0303028A        SECURITY AND              7,600           7,600
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   174   0303140A        INFORMATION               9,357           9,357
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   175   0303141A        GLOBAL COMBAT            41,225          41,225
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   176   0303142A        SATCOM GROUND            18,197          18,197
                          ENVIRONMENT
                          (SPACE).
   177   0303150A        WWMCCS/GLOBAL            14,215          14,215
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM.
   179   0305204A        TACTICAL                 33,533          33,533
                          UNMANNED
                          AERIAL
                          VEHICLES.
   180   0305208A        DISTRIBUTED              27,622          27,622
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   181   0305219A        MQ-1C GRAY               10,901          10,901
                          EAGLE UAS.
   182   0305232A        RQ-11 UAV......           2,321           2,321
   183   0305233A        RQ-7 UAV.......          12,031          12,031
   184   0305235A        VERTICAL UAS...
   185   0307665A        BIOMETRICS               12,449          12,449
                          ENABLED
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   186   0708045A        END ITEM                 56,136          56,136
                          INDUSTRIAL
                          PREPAREDNESS
                          ACTIVITIES.
  186A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED                4,717           4,717
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,131,319       1,101,319
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL            7,989,102       7,942,102
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, ARMY.
         ..............
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          NAVY
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601103N        UNIVERSITY              112,617         122,617
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
         ..............      Program                            [10,000]
                             increase.
   002   0601152N        IN-HOUSE                 18,230          18,230
                          LABORATORY
                          INDEPENDENT
                          RESEARCH.
   003   0601153N        DEFENSE                 484,459         484,459
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             615,306         625,306
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   004   0602114N        POWER                   104,513         104,513
                          PROJECTION
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   005   0602123N        FORCE                   145,307         145,307
                          PROTECTION
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   006   0602131M        MARINE CORPS             47,334          47,334
                          LANDING FORCE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   007   0602235N        COMMON PICTURE           34,163          34,163
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   008   0602236N        WARFIGHTER               49,689          49,689
                          SUSTAINMENT
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   009   0602271N        ELECTROMAGNETIC          97,701          97,701
                          SYSTEMS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   010   0602435N        OCEAN                    45,685          63,685
                          WARFIGHTING
                          ENVIRONMENT
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
         ..............      AGOR mid                           [18,000]
                             life refit.
   011   0602651M        JOINT NON-                6,060           6,060
                          LETHAL WEAPONS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   012   0602747N        UNDERSEA                103,050         103,050
                          WARFARE
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.

[[Page 9006]]

 
   013   0602750N        FUTURE NAVAL            169,710         169,710
                          CAPABILITIES
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   014   0602782N        MINE AND                 31,326          31,326
                          EXPEDITIONARY
                          WARFARE
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             834,538         852,538
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   015   0603114N        POWER                    48,201          48,201
                          PROJECTION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   016   0603123N        FORCE                    28,328          28,328
                          PROTECTION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   017   0603235N        COMMON PICTURE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   018   0603236N        WARFIGHTER
                          SUSTAINMENT
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   019   0603271N        ELECTROMAGNETIC          56,179          56,179
                          SYSTEMS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   020   0603640M        USMC ADVANCED           132,400         132,400
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATION
                          (ATD).
   021   0603651M        JOINT NON-               11,854          11,854
                          LETHAL WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   022   0603673N        FUTURE NAVAL            247,931         247,931
                          CAPABILITIES
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   023   0603729N        WARFIGHTER                4,760           4,760
                          PROTECTION
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   024   0603747N        UNDERSEA
                          WARFARE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   025   0603758N        NAVY                     51,463          51,463
                          WARFIGHTING
                          EXPERIMENTS
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
   026   0603782N        MINE AND                  2,000           2,000
                          EXPEDITIONARY
                          WARFARE
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             583,116         583,116
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          PROTOTYPES
   027   0603207N        AIR/OCEAN                42,246          42,246
                          TACTICAL
                          APPLICATIONS.
   028   0603216N        AVIATION                  5,591           5,591
                          SURVIVABILITY.
   029   0603237N        DEPLOYABLE                3,262           3,262
                          JOINT COMMAND
                          AND CONTROL.
   030   0603251N        AIRCRAFT                     74              74
                          SYSTEMS.
   031   0603254N        ASW SYSTEMS               7,964           7,964
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   032   0603261N        TACTICAL                  5,257           5,257
                          AIRBORNE
                          RECONNAISSANCE.
   033   0603382N        ADVANCED COMBAT           1,570           1,570
                          SYSTEMS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   034   0603502N        SURFACE AND             168,040         168,040
                          SHALLOW WATER
                          MINE
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S.
   035   0603506N        SURFACE SHIP             88,649          88,649
                          TORPEDO
                          DEFENSE.
   036   0603512N        CARRIER SYSTEMS          83,902          83,902
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   037   0603525N        PILOT FISH.....         108,713         108,713
   038   0603527N        RETRACT LARCH..           9,316           9,316
   039   0603536N        RETRACT JUNIPER          77,108          77,108
   040   0603542N        RADIOLOGICAL                762             762
                          CONTROL.
   041   0603553N        SURFACE ASW....           2,349           2,349
   042   0603561N        ADVANCED                852,977         874,977
                          SUBMARINE
                          SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............      Unmanned                           [22,000]
                             Underwater
                             Vehicle
                             Development.
   043   0603562N        SUBMARINE                 8,764           8,764
                          TACTICAL
                          WARFARE
                          SYSTEMS.
   044   0603563N        SHIP CONCEPT             20,501          20,501
                          ADVANCED
                          DESIGN.
   045   0603564N        SHIP                     27,052          27,052
                          PRELIMINARY
                          DESIGN &
                          FEASIBILITY
                          STUDIES.
   046   0603570N        ADVANCED                428,933         428,933
                          NUCLEAR POWER
                          SYSTEMS.
   047   0603573N        ADVANCED                 27,154          27,154
                          SURFACE
                          MACHINERY
                          SYSTEMS.
   048   0603576N        CHALK EAGLE....         519,140         519,140
   049   0603581N        LITTORAL COMBAT         406,389         406,389
                          SHIP (LCS).
   050   0603582N        COMBAT SYSTEM            36,570          36,570
                          INTEGRATION.
   051   0603609N        CONVENTIONAL              8,404           8,404
                          MUNITIONS.
   052   0603611M        MARINE CORPS            136,967         136,967
                          ASSAULT
                          VEHICLES.
   053   0603635M        MARINE CORPS              1,489           1,489
                          GROUND COMBAT/
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   054   0603654N        JOINT SERVICE            38,422          38,422
                          EXPLOSIVE
                          ORDNANCE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   055   0603658N        COOPERATIVE              69,312          69,312
                          ENGAGEMENT.
   056   0603713N        OCEAN                     9,196           9,196
                          ENGINEERING
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   057   0603721N        ENVIRONMENTAL            18,850          18,850
                          PROTECTION.
   058   0603724N        NAVY ENERGY              45,618          45,618
                          PROGRAM.
   059   0603725N        FACILITIES                3,019           3,019
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   060   0603734N        CHALK CORAL....         144,951         144,951
   061   0603739N        NAVY LOGISTIC             5,797           5,797
                          PRODUCTIVITY.
   062   0603746N        RETRACT MAPLE..         308,131         308,131
   063   0603748N        LINK PLUMERIA..         195,189         195,189
   064   0603751N        RETRACT ELM....          56,358          56,358
   065   0603764N        LINK EVERGREEN.          55,378          55,378
   066   0603787N        SPECIAL                  48,842          48,842
                          PROCESSES.
   067   0603790N        NATO RESEARCH             7,509           7,509
                          AND
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   068   0603795N        LAND ATTACK               5,075           5,075
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   069   0603851M        JOINT NON-               51,178          51,178
                          LETHAL WEAPONS
                          TESTING.
   070   0603860N        JOINT PRECISION         205,615         205,615
                          APPROACH AND
                          LANDING
                          SYSTEMS--DEM/
                          VAL.
   071   0603889N        COUNTERDRUG
                          RDT&E PROJECTS.
   072   0604272N        TACTICAL AIR             37,227          37,227
                          DIRECTIONAL
                          INFRARED
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S (TADIRCM).
   073   0604279N        ASE SELF-                   169             169
                          PROTECTION
                          OPTIMIZATION.
   074   0604653N        JOINT COUNTER            20,874          10,874
                          RADIO
                          CONTROLLED IED
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE
                          (JCREW).
         ..............      Schedule                          [-10,000]
                             delay.
   075   0604659N        PRECISION                 2,257           2,257
                          STRIKE WEAPONS
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   076   0604707N        SPACE AND                38,327          38,327
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE (SEW)
                          ARCHITECTURE/
                          ENGINEERING
                          SUPPORT.
   077   0604786N        OFFENSIVE ANTI-         135,985         135,985
                          SURFACE
                          WARFARE WEAPON
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   078   0605812M        JOINT LIGHT              50,362          50,362
                          TACTICAL
                          VEHICLE (JLTV)
                          ENGINEERING
                          AND
                          MANUFACTURING
                          DEVELOPMENT PH.
   079   0303354N        ASW SYSTEMS               8,448           8,448
                          DEVELOPMENT--M
                          IP.
   080   0304270N        ELECTRONIC                  153             153
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT--M
                          IP.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           4,641,385       4,653,385
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            & PROTOTYPES.
         ..............

[[Page 9007]]

 
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          DEMONSTRATION
   081   0604212N        OTHER HELO               40,558          40,558
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   082   0604214N        AV-8B AIRCRAFT--         35,825          35,825
                          ENG DEV.
   083   0604215N        STANDARDS                99,891          99,891
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   084   0604216N        MULTI-MISSION            17,565          17,565
                          HELICOPTER
                          UPGRADE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   085   0604218N        AIR/OCEAN                 4,026           4,026
                          EQUIPMENT
                          ENGINEERING.
   086   0604221N        P-3                       1,791           1,791
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   087   0604230N        WARFARE SUPPORT          11,725          11,725
                          SYSTEM.
   088   0604231N        TACTICAL                 68,463          68,463
                          COMMAND SYSTEM.
   089   0604234N        ADVANCED                152,041         152,041
                          HAWKEYE.
   090   0604245N        H-1 UPGRADES...          47,123          47,123
   091   0604261N        ACOUSTIC SEARCH          30,208          30,208
                          SENSORS.
   092   0604262N        V-22A..........          43,084          43,084
   093   0604264N        AIR CREW                 11,401          11,401
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   094   0604269N        EA-18..........          11,138          11,138
   095   0604270N        ELECTRONIC               34,964          34,964
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   096   0604273N        VH-71A                   94,238          94,238
                          EXECUTIVE HELO
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   097   0604274N        NEXT GENERATION         257,796         257,796
                          JAMMER (NGJ).
   098   0604280N        JOINT TACTICAL            3,302           3,302
                          RADIO SYSTEM--
                          NAVY (JTRS-
                          NAVY).
   099   0604307N        SURFACE                 240,298         240,298
                          COMBATANT
                          COMBAT SYSTEM
                          ENGINEERING.
   100   0604311N        LPD-17 CLASS              1,214           1,214
                          SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION.
   101   0604329N        SMALL DIAMETER           46,007          46,007
                          BOMB (SDB).
   102   0604366N        STANDARD                 75,592          75,592
                          MISSILE
                          IMPROVEMENTS.
   103   0604373N        AIRBORNE MCM...         117,854         117,854
   104   0604376M        MARINE AIR               10,080          10,080
                          GROUND TASK
                          FORCE (MAGTF)
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE (EW)
                          FOR AVIATION.
   105   0604378N        NAVAL                    21,413          21,413
                          INTEGRATED
                          FIRE CONTROL--
                          COUNTER AIR
                          SYSTEMS
                          ENGINEERING.
   106   0604404N        UNMANNED                146,683         146,683
                          CARRIER
                          LAUNCHED
                          AIRBORNE
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          AND STRIKE
                          (UCLASS)
                          SYSTEM.
   107   0604501N        ADVANCED ABOVE          275,871         275,871
                          WATER SENSORS.
   108   0604503N        SSN-688 AND              89,672          89,672
                          TRIDENT
                          MODERNIZATION.
   109   0604504N        AIR CONTROL....          13,754          13,754
   110   0604512N        SHIPBOARD                69,615          69,615
                          AVIATION
                          SYSTEMS.
   111   0604518N        COMBAT
                          INFORMATION
                          CENTER
                          CONVERSION.
   112   0604558N        NEW DESIGN SSN.         121,566         121,566
   113   0604562N        SUBMARINE                49,143          49,143
                          TACTICAL
                          WARFARE SYSTEM.
   114   0604567N        SHIP CONTRACT           155,254         155,254
                          DESIGN/ LIVE
                          FIRE T&E.
   115   0604574N        NAVY TACTICAL             3,689           3,689
                          COMPUTER
                          RESOURCES.
   116   0604601N        MINE                      5,041           5,041
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   117   0604610N        LIGHTWEIGHT              26,444          26,444
                          TORPEDO
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   118   0604654N        JOINT SERVICE             8,897           8,897
                          EXPLOSIVE
                          ORDNANCE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   119   0604703N        PERSONNEL,                6,233           6,233
                          TRAINING,
                          SIMULATION,
                          AND HUMAN
                          FACTORS.
   120   0604727N        JOINT STANDOFF              442             442
                          WEAPON SYSTEMS.
   121   0604755N        SHIP SELF               130,360         130,360
                          DEFENSE
                          (DETECT &
                          CONTROL).
   122   0604756N        SHIP SELF                50,209          50,209
                          DEFENSE
                          (ENGAGE: HARD
                          KILL).
   123   0604757N        SHIP SELF               164,799         164,799
                          DEFENSE
                          (ENGAGE: SOFT
                          KILL/EW).
   124   0604761N        INTELLIGENCE              1,984           1,984
                          ENGINEERING.
   125   0604771N        MEDICAL                   9,458           9,458
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   126   0604777N        NAVIGATION/ID            51,430          51,430
                          SYSTEM.
   127   0604800M        JOINT STRIKE            512,631         512,631
                          FIGHTER (JSF)--
                          EMD.
   128   0604800N        JOINT STRIKE            534,187         534,187
                          FIGHTER (JSF)--
                          EMD.
   129   0605013M        INFORMATION               5,564           5,564
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   130   0605013N        INFORMATION              69,659          69,659
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   131   0605018N        NAVY INTEGRATED
                          MILITARY HUMAN
                          RESOURCES
                          SYSTEM (N-
                          IMHRS).
   132   0605212N        CH-53K RDTE....         503,180         503,180
   133   0605450N        JOINT AIR-TO-             5,500           5,500
                          GROUND MISSILE
                          (JAGM).
   134   0605500N        MULTI-MISSION           317,358         317,358
                          MARITIME
                          AIRCRAFT (MMA).
   135   0204202N        DDG-1000.......         187,910         187,910
   136   0304231N        TACTICAL                  2,140           2,140
                          COMMAND
                          SYSTEM--MIP.
   137   0304785N        TACTICAL                  9,406           9,406
                          CRYPTOLOGIC
                          SYSTEMS.
   138   0305124N        SPECIAL                  22,800          22,800
                          APPLICATIONS
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           5,028,476       5,028,476
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            &
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   139   0604256N        THREAT                   43,261          43,261
                          SIMULATOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   140   0604258N        TARGET SYSTEMS           71,872          71,872
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   141   0604759N        MAJOR T&E                38,033          38,033
                          INVESTMENT.
   142   0605126N        JOINT THEATER             1,352           1,352
                          AIR AND
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          ORGANIZATION.
   143   0605152N        STUDIES AND               5,566           5,566
                          ANALYSIS
                          SUPPORT--NAVY.
   144   0605154N        CENTER FOR               48,345          48,345
                          NAVAL ANALYSES.
   145   0605502N        SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH.
   146   0605804N        TECHNICAL                   637             637
                          INFORMATION
                          SERVICES.
   147   0605853N        MANAGEMENT,              76,585          76,585
                          TECHNICAL &
                          INTERNATIONAL
                          SUPPORT.
   148   0605856N        STRATEGIC                 3,221           3,221
                          TECHNICAL
                          SUPPORT.
   149   0605861N        RDT&E SCIENCE            72,725          72,725
                          AND TECHNOLOGY
                          MANAGEMENT.
   150   0605863N        RDT&E SHIP AND          141,778         141,778
                          AIRCRAFT
                          SUPPORT.
   151   0605864N        TEST AND                331,219         331,219
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   152   0605865N        OPERATIONAL              16,565          16,565
                          TEST AND
                          EVALUATION
                          CAPABILITY.
   153   0605866N        NAVY SPACE AND            3,265           3,265
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE (SEW)
                          SUPPORT.
   154   0605867N        SEW                       7,134           7,134
                          SURVEILLANCE/
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SUPPORT.

[[Page 9008]]

 
   155   0605873M        MARINE CORPS             24,082          24,082
                          PROGRAM WIDE
                          SUPPORT.
   156   0305885N        TACTICAL                    497             497
                          CRYPTOLOGIC
                          ACTIVITIES.
   157   0909999N        FINANCING FOR
                          CANCELLED
                          ACCOUNT
                          ADJUSTMENTS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             886,137         886,137
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
   159   0604227N        HARPOON                     699             699
                          MODIFICATIONS.
   160   0604402N        UNMANNED COMBAT          20,961          40,961
                          AIR VEHICLE
                          (UCAV)
                          ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT AND
                          PROTOTYPE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............      X-47B                              [20,000]
                             Aerial
                             Refueling
                             Test &
                             Evaluation.
   161   0604717M        MARINE CORPS
                          COMBAT
                          SERVICES
                          SUPPORT.
   162   0604766M        MARINE CORPS                 35              35
                          DATA SYSTEMS.
   163   0605525N        CARRIER ONBOARD           2,460           2,460
                          DELIVERY (COD)
                          FOLLOW ON.
   164   0605555N        STRIKE WEAPONS            9,757           9,757
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   165   0101221N        STRATEGIC SUB &          98,057         121,957
                          WEAPONS SYSTEM
                          SUPPORT.
         ..............      Reentry                            [23,900]
                             System
                             Application
                             s and
                             Strategic
                             Guidance
                             Application
                             s.
   166   0101224N        SSBN SECURITY            31,768          31,768
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
   167   0101226N        SUBMARINE                 1,464           1,464
                          ACOUSTIC
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   168   0101402N        NAVY STRATEGIC           21,729          21,729
                          COMMUNICATIONS.
   169   0203761N        RAPID                    13,561          13,561
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          TRANSITION
                          (RTT).
   170   0204136N        F/A-18                  131,118         131,118
                          SQUADRONS.
   171   0204152N        E-2 SQUADRONS..           1,971           1,971
   172   0204163N        FLEET                    46,155          46,155
                          TELECOMMUNICAT
                          IONS
                          (TACTICAL).
   173   0204228N        SURFACE SUPPORT           2,374           2,374
   174   0204229N        TOMAHAWK AND             12,407          12,407
                          TOMAHAWK
                          MISSION
                          PLANNING
                          CENTER (TMPC).
   175   0204311N        INTEGRATED               41,609          41,609
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM.
   176   0204413N        AMPHIBIOUS                7,240           7,240
                          TACTICAL
                          SUPPORT UNITS
                          (DISPLACEMENT
                          CRAFT).
   177   0204460M        GROUND/AIR TASK          78,208          78,208
                          ORIENTED RADAR
                          (G/ATOR).
   178   0204571N        CONSOLIDATED             45,124          45,124
                          TRAINING
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   179   0204574N        CRYPTOLOGIC               2,703           2,703
                          DIRECT SUPPORT.
   180   0204575N        ELECTRONIC               19,563          19,563
                          WARFARE (EW)
                          READINESS
                          SUPPORT.
   181   0205601N        HARM                     13,586          13,586
                          IMPROVEMENT.
   182   0205604N        TACTICAL DATA           197,538         197,538
                          LINKS.
   183   0205620N        SURFACE ASW              31,863          31,863
                          COMBAT SYSTEM
                          INTEGRATION.
   184   0205632N        MK-48 ADCAP....          12,806          12,806
   185   0205633N        AVIATION                 88,607          88,607
                          IMPROVEMENTS.
   186   0205658N        NAVY SCIENCE
                          ASSISTANCE
                          PROGRAM.
   187   0205675N        OPERATIONAL             116,928         116,928
                          NUCLEAR POWER
                          SYSTEMS.
   188   0206313M        MARINE CORPS            178,753         178,753
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS.
   189   0206623M        MARINE CORPS            139,594         113,794
                          GROUND COMBAT/
                          SUPPORTING
                          ARMS SYSTEMS.
         ..............      Marine                            [-20,800]
                             personnel
                             carrier--fu
                             nding ahead
                             of need.
         ..............      Precision                          [-5,000]
                             extended
                             range
                             munition
                             program
                             reduction.
   190   0206624M        MARINE CORPS             42,647          42,647
                          COMBAT
                          SERVICES
                          SUPPORT.
   191   0206625M        USMC                     34,394          34,394
                          INTELLIGENCE/
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE
                          SYSTEMS (MIP).
   192   0207161N        TACTICAL AIM             39,159          39,159
                          MISSILES.
   193   0207163N        ADVANCED MEDIUM           2,613           2,613
                          RANGE AIR-TO-
                          AIR MISSILE
                          (AMRAAM).
   194   0208058N        JOINT HIGH                  986             986
                          SPEED VESSEL
                          (JHSV).
   199   0303109N        SATELLITE                66,231          66,231
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          (SPACE).
   200   0303138N        CONSOLIDATED             24,476          24,476
                          AFLOAT NETWORK
                          ENTERPRISE
                          SERVICES
                          (CANES).
   201   0303140N        INFORMATION              23,531          23,531
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   202   0303150M        WWMCCS/GLOBAL
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM.
   203   0303238N        CONSOLIDATED
                          AFLOAT NETWORK
                          ENTERPRISE
                          SERVICES
                          (CANES)--MIP.
   205   0305149N        COBRA JUDY.....
   206   0305160N        NAVY                        742             742
                          METEOROLOGICAL
                          AND OCEAN
                          SENSORS-SPACE
                          (METOC).
   207   0305192N        MILITARY                  4,804           4,804
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          PROGRAM (MIP)
                          ACTIVITIES.
   208   0305204N        TACTICAL                  8,381           8,381
                          UNMANNED
                          AERIAL
                          VEHICLES.
   209   0305206N        AIRBORNE
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SYSTEMS.
   210   0305207N        MANNED
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SYSTEMS.
   211   0305208M        DISTRIBUTED               5,535           5,535
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   212   0305208N        DISTRIBUTED              19,718          19,718
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   213   0305220N        RQ-4 UAV.......         375,235         375,235
   214   0305231N        MQ-8 UAV.......          48,713          48,713
   215   0305232M        RQ-11 UAV......             102             102
   216   0305233N        RQ-7 UAV.......             710             710
   217   0305234N        SMALL (LEVEL 0)           5,013           5,013
                          TACTICAL UAS
                          (STUASL0).
   218   0305237N        MEDIUM RANGE
                          MARITIME UAS.
   219   0305239M        RQ-21A.........          11,122          11,122
   220   0305241N        MULTI-                   28,851          28,851
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SENSOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   221   0308601N        MODELING AND              5,116           5,116
                          SIMULATION
                          SUPPORT.
   222   0702207N        DEPOT                    28,042          28,042
                          MAINTENANCE
                          (NON-IF).
   223   0708011N        INDUSTRIAL               50,933          50,933
                          PREPAREDNESS.
   224   0708730N        MARITIME                  4,998           4,998
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (MARITECH).
  224A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED            1,185,132       1,185,132
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           3,385,822       3,403,922
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           15,974,780      16,032,880
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, NAVY.
         ..............
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          AF
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH

[[Page 9009]]

 
   001   0601102F        DEFENSE                 373,151         373,151
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
   002   0601103F        UNIVERSITY              138,333         138,333
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
   003   0601108F        HIGH ENERGY              13,286          13,286
                          LASER RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVES.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             524,770         524,770
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   004   0602102F        MATERIALS......         116,846         116,846
   005   0602201F        AEROSPACE               119,672         119,672
                          VEHICLE
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   006   0602202F        HUMAN                    89,483          89,483
                          EFFECTIVENESS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   007   0602203F        AEROSPACE               197,546         197,546
                          PROPULSION.
   008   0602204F        AEROSPACE               127,539         127,539
                          SENSORS.
   009   0602601F        SPACE                   104,063         104,063
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   010   0602602F        CONVENTIONAL             81,521          81,521
                          MUNITIONS.
   011   0602605F        DIRECTED ENERGY         112,845         112,845
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   012   0602788F        DOMINANT                138,161         138,161
                          INFORMATION
                          SCIENCES AND
                          METHODS.
   013   0602890F        HIGH ENERGY              40,217          40,217
                          LASER RESEARCH.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,127,893       1,127,893
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   014   0603112F        ADVANCED                 39,572          49,572
                          MATERIALS FOR
                          WEAPON SYSTEMS.
         ..............      Program                            [10,000]
                             increase.
   015   0603199F        SUSTAINMENT              12,800          12,800
                          SCIENCE AND
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (S&T).
   016   0603203F        ADVANCED                 30,579          30,579
                          AEROSPACE
                          SENSORS.
   017   0603211F        AEROSPACE                77,347          77,347
                          TECHNOLOGY DEV/
                          DEMO.
   018   0603216F        AEROSPACE               149,321         149,321
                          PROPULSION AND
                          POWER
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   019   0603270F        ELECTRONIC               49,128          49,128
                          COMBAT
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   020   0603401F        ADVANCED                 68,071          68,071
                          SPACECRAFT
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   021   0603444F        MAUI SPACE               26,299          26,299
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM (MSSS).
   022   0603456F        HUMAN                    20,967          20,967
                          EFFECTIVENESS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   023   0603601F        CONVENTIONAL             33,996          33,996
                          WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   024   0603605F        ADVANCED                 19,000          19,000
                          WEAPONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   025   0603680F        MANUFACTURING            41,353          41,353
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
   026   0603788F        BATTLESPACE              49,093          49,093
                          KNOWLEDGE
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATION.
   027   0603924F        HIGH ENERGY
                          LASER ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             617,526         627,526
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          PROTOTYPES
   028   0603260F        INTELLIGENCE              3,983           3,983
                          ADVANCED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   029   0603287F        PHYSICAL                  3,874           3,874
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT.
   030   0603430F        ADVANCED EHF
                          MILSATCOM
                          (SPACE).
   031   0603432F        POLAR MILSATCOM
                          (SPACE).
   032   0603438F        SPACE CONTROL            27,024          27,024
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   033   0603742F        COMBAT                   15,899          15,899
                          IDENTIFICATION
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   034   0603790F        NATO RESEARCH             4,568           4,568
                          AND
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   035   0603791F        INTERNATIONAL               379             379
                          SPACE
                          COOPERATIVE
                          R&D.
   036   0603830F        SPACE                    28,764          28,764
                          PROTECTION
                          PROGRAM (SPP).
   037   0603850F        INTEGRATED
                          BROADCAST
                          SERVICE--DEM/
                          VAL.
   038   0603851F        INTERCONTINENTA          86,737          86,737
                          L BALLISTIC
                          MISSILE--DEM/
                          VAL.
   039   0603854F        WIDEBAND GLOBAL
                          SATCOM RDT&E
                          (SPACE).
   040   0603859F        POLLUTION                   953             953
                          PREVENTION--DE
                          M/VAL.
   041   0603860F        JOINT PRECISION
                          APPROACH AND
                          LANDING
                          SYSTEMS--DEM/
                          VAL.
   042   0604015F        LONG RANGE              379,437         379,437
                          STRIKE.
   043   0604283F        BATTLE MGMT COM
                          & CTRL SENSOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   044   0604317F        TECHNOLOGY                2,606           2,606
                          TRANSFER.
   045   0604327F        HARD AND DEEPLY             103             103
                          BURIED TARGET
                          DEFEAT SYSTEM
                          (HDBTDS)
                          PROGRAM.
   046   0604330F        JOINT DUAL ROLE
                          AIR DOMINANCE
                          MISSILE.
   047   0604337F        REQUIREMENTS             16,018          16,018
                          ANALYSIS AND
                          MATURATION.
   048   0604422F        WEATHER SYSTEM
                          FOLLOW-ON.
   049   0604458F        AIR & SPACE OPS          58,861          58,861
                          CENTER.
   050   0604618F        JOINT DIRECT              2,500           2,500
                          ATTACK
                          MUNITION.
   051   0604635F        GROUND ATTACK            21,175          21,175
                          WEAPONS FUZE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   052   0604857F        OPERATIONALLY
                          RESPONSIVE
                          SPACE.
   053   0604858F        TECH TRANSITION          13,636          13,636
                          PROGRAM.
   054   0105921F        SERVICE SUPPORT           2,799           2,799
                          TO STRATCOM--
                          SPACE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   055   0207455F        THREE                    70,160          70,160
                          DIMENSIONAL
                          LONG-RANGE
                          RADAR (3DELRR).
   056   0305164F        NAVSTAR GLOBAL          137,233         137,233
                          POSITIONING
                          SYSTEM (USER
                          EQUIPMENT)
                          (SPACE).
   057   0305178F        NATIONAL POLAR-
                          ORBITING
                          OPERATIONAL
                          ENVIRONMENTAL
                          SATELLITE
                          SYSTEM
                          (NPOESS).
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             876,709         876,709
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            & PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT &
                          DEMONSTRATION
   058   0603260F        INTELLIGENCE                977             977
                          ADVANCED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   059   0603840F        GLOBAL
                          BROADCAST
                          SERVICE (GBS).
   060   0604222F        NUCLEAR WEAPONS
                          SUPPORT.
   061   0604233F        SPECIALIZED               3,601           3,601
                          UNDERGRADUATE
                          FLIGHT
                          TRAINING.
   062   0604270F        ELECTRONIC                1,971           1,971
                          WARFARE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   063   0604280F        JOINT TACTICAL
                          RADIO.
   064   0604281F        TACTICAL DATA            51,456          51,456
                          NETWORKS
                          ENTERPRISE.
   065   0604287F        PHYSICAL                     50              50
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT.

[[Page 9010]]

 
   066   0604329F        SMALL DIAMETER          115,000         115,000
                          BOMB (SDB)--
                          EMD.
   067   0604421F        COUNTERSPACE             23,930          23,930
                          SYSTEMS.
   068   0604425F        SPACE SITUATION         400,258         400,258
                          AWARENESS
                          SYSTEMS.
   069   0604429F        AIRBORNE                  4,575           4,575
                          ELECTRONIC
                          ATTACK.
   070   0604441F        SPACE BASED             352,532         372,532
                          INFRARED
                          SYSTEM (SBIRS)
                          HIGH EMD.
         ..............      Space Based                        [20,000]
                             Infrared
                             Systems
                             (SBIRS)
                             Data
                             Exploitatio
                             n.
   071   0604602F        ARMAMENT/                16,284          16,284
                          ORDNANCE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   072   0604604F        SUBMUNITIONS...           2,564           2,564
   073   0604617F        AGILE COMBAT             17,036          17,036
                          SUPPORT.
   074   0604706F        LIFE SUPPORT              7,273           7,273
                          SYSTEMS.
   075   0604735F        COMBAT TRAINING          33,200          33,200
                          RANGES.
   076   0604740F        INTEGRATED
                          COMMAND &
                          CONTROL
                          APPLICATIONS
                          (IC2A).
   077   0604750F        INTELLIGENCE
                          EQUIPMENT.
   078   0604800F        F-35--EMD......         816,335         816,335
   079   0604851F        INTERCONTINENTA         145,442         145,442
                          L BALLISTIC
                          MISSILE--EMD.
   080   0604853F        EVOLVED                  27,963          27,963
                          EXPENDABLE
                          LAUNCH VEHICLE
                          PROGRAM
                          (SPACE)--EMD.
   081   0604932F        LONG RANGE                5,000           5,000
                          STANDOFF
                          WEAPON.
   082   0604933F        ICBM FUZE               129,411         129,411
                          MODERNIZATION.
   083   0605213F        F-22                    131,100         131,100
                          MODERNIZATION
                          INCREMENT 3.2B.
   084   0605221F        KC-46..........       1,558,590       1,558,590
   085   0605229F        CSAR HH-60              393,558         393,558
                          RECAPITALIZATI
                          ON.
   086   0605278F        HC/MC-130 RECAP           6,242           6,242
                          RDT&E.
   087   0605431F        ADVANCED EHF            272,872         272,872
                          MILSATCOM
                          (SPACE).
   088   0605432F        POLAR MILSATCOM         124,805         124,805
                          (SPACE).
   089   0605433F        WIDEBAND GLOBAL          13,948          13,948
                          SATCOM (SPACE).
   090   0605931F        B-2 DEFENSIVE           303,500         303,500
                          MANAGEMENT
                          SYSTEM.
   091   0101125F        NUCLEAR WEAPONS          67,874          67,874
                          MODERNIZATION.
   092   0207100F        LIGHT ATTACK
                          ARMED
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          (LAAR)
                          SQUADRONS.
   093   0207604F        READINESS
                          TRAINING
                          RANGES,
                          OPERATIONS AND
                          MAINTENANCE.
   094   0207701F        FULL COMBAT               4,663           4,663
                          MISSION
                          TRAINING.
   095   0305230F        MC-12..........
   096   0401138F        C-27J AIRLIFT
                          SQUADRONS.
   097   0401318F        CV-22..........          46,705          46,705
   098   0401845F        AIRBORNE SENIOR
                          LEADER C3
                          (SLC3S).
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           5,078,715       5,098,715
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            &
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   099   0604256F        THREAT                   17,690          17,690
                          SIMULATOR
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   100   0604759F        MAJOR T&E                34,841          34,841
                          INVESTMENT.
   101   0605101F        RAND PROJECT             32,956          32,956
                          AIR FORCE.
   102   0605502F        SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATION
                          RESEARCH.
   103   0605712F        INITIAL                  13,610          13,610
                          OPERATIONAL
                          TEST &
                          EVALUATION.
   104   0605807F        TEST AND                742,658         742,658
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   105   0605860F        ROCKET SYSTEMS           14,203          14,203
                          LAUNCH PROGRAM
                          (SPACE).
   106   0605864F        SPACE TEST               13,000          13,000
                          PROGRAM (STP).
   107   0605976F        FACILITIES               44,160          44,160
                          RESTORATION
                          AND
                          MODERNIZATION-
                          -TEST AND
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   108   0605978F        FACILITIES               27,643          27,643
                          SUSTAINMENT--T
                          EST AND
                          EVALUATION
                          SUPPORT.
   109   0606323F        MULTI-SERVICE            13,935          13,935
                          SYSTEMS
                          ENGINEERING
                          INITIATIVE.
   110   0606392F        SPACE AND               192,348         192,348
                          MISSILE CENTER
                          (SMC) CIVILIAN
                          WORKFORCE.
   111   0702806F        ACQUISITION AND          28,647          28,647
                          MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT.
   112   0804731F        GENERAL SKILL               315             315
                          TRAINING.
   113   0909999F        FINANCING FOR
                          CANCELLED
                          ACCOUNT
                          ADJUSTMENTS.
   114   1001004F        INTERNATIONAL             3,785           3,785
                          ACTIVITIES.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,179,791       1,179,791
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
   115   0603423F        GLOBAL                  383,500         383,500
                          POSITIONING
                          SYSTEM III--
                          OPERATIONAL
                          CONTROL
                          SEGMENT.
   116   0604263F        COMMON VERTICAL
                          LIFT SUPPORT
                          PLATFORM.
   117   0604445F        WIDE AREA                 5,000           5,000
                          SURVEILLANCE.
   118   0605018F        AF INTEGRATED            90,097          90,097
                          PERSONNEL AND
                          PAY SYSTEM (AF-
                          IPPS).
   119   0605024F        ANTI-TAMPER              32,086          32,086
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          EXECUTIVE
                          AGENCY.
   121   0101113F        B-52 SQUADRONS.          24,007          24,007
   122   0101122F        AIR-LAUNCHED                450             450
                          CRUISE MISSILE
                          (ALCM).
   123   0101126F        B-1B SQUADRONS.          19,589          19,589
   124   0101127F        B-2 SQUADRONS..         100,194         100,194
   125   0101313F        STRAT WAR                37,448          37,448
                          PLANNING
                          SYSTEM--USSTRA
                          TCOM.
   126   0101314F        NIGHT FIST--
                          USSTRATCOM.
   128   0102326F        REGION/SECTOR             1,700           1,700
                          OPERATION
                          CONTROL CENTER
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   129   0102823F        STRATEGIC
                          AEROSPACE
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SYSTEM
                          ACTIVITIES.
   130   0203761F        WARFIGHTER                3,844           3,844
                          RAPID
                          ACQUISITION
                          PROCESS (WRAP)
                          RAPID
                          TRANSITION
                          FUND.
   131   0205219F        MQ-9 UAV.......         128,328         128,328
   132   0207040F        MULTI-PLATFORM
                          ELECTRONIC
                          WARFARE
                          EQUIPMENT.
   133   0207131F        A-10 SQUADRONS.           9,614           9,614
   134   0207133F        F-16 SQUADRONS.         177,298         177,298
   135   0207134F        F-15E SQUADRONS         244,289         244,289
   136   0207136F        MANNED                   13,138          13,138
                          DESTRUCTIVE
                          SUPPRESSION.
   137   0207138F        F-22A SQUADRONS         328,542         328,542
   138   0207142F        F-35 SQUADRONS.          33,000          33,000
   139   0207161F        TACTICAL AIM             15,460          15,460
                          MISSILES.

[[Page 9011]]

 
   140   0207163F        ADVANCED MEDIUM          84,172          84,172
                          RANGE AIR-TO-
                          AIR MISSILE
                          (AMRAAM).
   141   0207170F        JOINT HELMET
                          MOUNTED CUEING
                          SYSTEM (JHMCS).
   142   0207224F        COMBAT RESCUE             2,582           2,582
                          AND RECOVERY.
   143   0207227F        COMBAT RESCUE--             542             542
                          PARARESCUE.
   144   0207247F        AF TENCAP......          89,816          89,816
   145   0207249F        PRECISION                 1,075           1,075
                          ATTACK SYSTEMS
                          PROCUREMENT.
   146   0207253F        COMPASS CALL...          10,782          10,782
   147   0207268F        AIRCRAFT ENGINE         139,369         139,369
                          COMPONENT
                          IMPROVEMENT
                          PROGRAM.
   148   0207277F        ISR INNOVATIONS
   149   0207325F        JOINT AIR-TO-             6,373           6,373
                          SURFACE
                          STANDOFF
                          MISSILE
                          (JASSM).
   150   0207410F        AIR & SPACE              22,820          22,820
                          OPERATIONS
                          CENTER (AOC).
   151   0207412F        CONTROL AND               7,029           7,029
                          REPORTING
                          CENTER (CRC).
   152   0207417F        AIRBORNE                186,256         186,256
                          WARNING AND
                          CONTROL SYSTEM
                          (AWACS).
   153   0207418F        TACTICAL                    743             743
                          AIRBORNE
                          CONTROL
                          SYSTEMS.
   154   0207423F        ADVANCED
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS.
   156   0207431F        COMBAT AIR                4,471           4,471
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SYSTEM
                          ACTIVITIES.
   157   0207438F        THEATER BATTLE
                          MANAGEMENT
                          (TBM) C4I.
   158   0207444F        TACTICAL AIR             10,250          10,250
                          CONTROL PARTY-
                          MOD.
   159   0207448F        C2ISR TACTICAL            1,431           1,431
                          DATA LINK.
   160   0207449F        COMMAND AND               7,329           7,329
                          CONTROL (C2)
                          CONSTELLATION.
   161   0207452F        DCAPES.........          15,081          15,081
   162   0207581F        JOINT                    13,248          13,248
                          SURVEILLANCE/
                          TARGET ATTACK
                          RADAR SYSTEM
                          (JSTARS).
   163   0207590F        SEEK EAGLE.....          24,342          24,342
   164   0207601F        USAF MODELING            10,448          10,448
                          AND SIMULATION.
   165   0207605F        WARGAMING AND             5,512           5,512
                          SIMULATION
                          CENTERS.
   166   0207697F        DISTRIBUTED               3,301           3,301
                          TRAINING AND
                          EXERCISES.
   167   0208006F        MISSION                  62,605          62,605
                          PLANNING
                          SYSTEMS.
   168   0208021F        INFORMATION
                          WARFARE
                          SUPPORT.
   169   0208059F        CYBER COMMAND            68,099          68,099
                          ACTIVITIES.
   170   0208087F        AF OFFENSIVE             14,047          14,047
                          CYBERSPACE
                          OPERATIONS.
   171   0208088F        AF DEFENSIVE              5,853           5,853
                          CYBERSPACE
                          OPERATIONS.
   179   0301400F        SPACE                    12,197          12,197
                          SUPERIORITY
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   180   0302015F        E-4B NATIONAL            18,267          18,267
                          AIRBORNE
                          OPERATIONS
                          CENTER (NAOC).
   181   0303131F        MINIMUM                  36,288          36,288
                          ESSENTIAL
                          EMERGENCY
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          NETWORK
                          (MEECN).
   182   0303140F        INFORMATION              90,231          90,231
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   183   0303141F        GLOBAL COMBAT               725             725
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   184   0303150F        GLOBAL COMMAND
                          AND CONTROL
                          SYSTEM.
   185   0303601F        MILSATCOM               140,170         140,170
                          TERMINALS.
   187   0304260F        AIRBORNE SIGINT         117,110         117,110
                          ENTERPRISE.
   190   0305099F        GLOBAL AIR                4,430           4,430
                          TRAFFIC
                          MANAGEMENT
                          (GATM).
   191   0305103F        CYBER SECURITY            2,048           2,048
                          INITIATIVE.
   192   0305105F        DOD CYBER CRIME             288             288
                          CENTER.
   193   0305110F        SATELLITE                35,698          35,698
                          CONTROL
                          NETWORK
                          (SPACE).
   194   0305111F        WEATHER SERVICE          24,667          24,667
   195   0305114F        AIR TRAFFIC              35,674          35,674
                          CONTROL,
                          APPROACH, AND
                          LANDING SYSTEM
                          (ATCALS).
   196   0305116F        AERIAL TARGETS.          21,186          21,186
   199   0305128F        SECURITY AND                195             195
                          INVESTIGATIVE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   200   0305145F        ARMS CONTROL              1,430           1,430
                          IMPLEMENTATION.
   201   0305146F        DEFENSE JOINT               330             330
                          COUNTERINTELLI
                          GENCE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   203   0305164F        NAVSTAR GLOBAL
                          POSITIONING
                          SYSTEM (USER
                          EQUIPMENT)
                          (SPACE).
   204   0305165F        NAVSTAR GLOBAL
                          POSITIONING
                          SYSTEM (SPACE
                          AND CONTROL
                          SEGMENTS).
   206   0305173F        SPACE AND                 3,696           3,696
                          MISSILE TEST
                          AND EVALUATION
                          CENTER.
   207   0305174F        SPACE                     2,469           2,469
                          INNOVATION,
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND RAPID
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   208   0305179F        INTEGRATED                8,289           8,289
                          BROADCAST
                          SERVICE (IBS).
   209   0305182F        SPACELIFT RANGE          13,345          13,345
                          SYSTEM (SPACE).
   210   0305193F        CYBER
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   211   0305202F        DRAGON U-2.....          18,700          18,700
   212   0305205F        ENDURANCE                 3,000           3,000
                          UNMANNED
                          AERIAL
                          VEHICLES.
   213   0305206F        AIRBORNE                 37,828          37,828
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SYSTEMS.
   214   0305207F        MANNED                   13,491          13,491
                          RECONNAISSANCE
                          SYSTEMS.
   215   0305208F        DISTRIBUTED               7,498           7,498
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   216   0305219F        MQ-1 PREDATOR A           3,326           3,326
                          UAV.
   217   0305220F        RQ-4 UAV.......         134,406         134,406
   218   0305221F        NETWORK-CENTRIC           7,413           7,413
                          COLLABORATIVE
                          TARGETING.
   219   0305236F        COMMON DATA              40,503          40,503
                          LINK (CDL).
   220   0305238F        NATO AGS.......         264,134         264,134
   221   0305240F        SUPPORT TO DCGS          23,016          23,016
                          ENTERPRISE.
   222   0305265F        GPS III SPACE           221,276         221,276
                          SEGMENT.
   223   0305614F        JSPOC MISSION            58,523          58,523
                          SYSTEM.
   224   0305881F        RAPID CYBER               2,218           2,218
                          ACQUISITION.
   225   0305887F        INTELLIGENCE
                          SUPPORT TO
                          INFORMATION
                          WARFARE.
   226   0305913F        NUDET DETECTION          50,547          50,547
                          SYSTEM (SPACE).
   227   0305940F        SPACE SITUATION          18,807          18,807
                          AWARENESS
                          OPERATIONS.
   228   0307141F        INFORMATION
                          OPERATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          INTEGRATION &
                          TOOL
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   229   0308699F        SHARED EARLY              1,079           1,079
                          WARNING (SEW).
   230   0401115F        C-130 AIRLIFT               400          26,400
                          SQUADRON.
         ..............      C-130H                             [26,000]
                             Propulsion
                             System
                             Propeller
                             Upgrades.
   231   0401119F        C-5 AIRLIFT              61,492          61,492
                          SQUADRONS (IF).
   232   0401130F        C-17 AIRCRAFT           109,134         109,134
                          (IF).

[[Page 9012]]

 
   233   0401132F        C-130J PROGRAM.          22,443          22,443
   234   0401134F        LARGE AIRCRAFT            4,116           4,116
                          IR
                          COUNTERMEASURE
                          S (LAIRCM).
   235   0401139F        LIGHT MOBILITY
                          AIRCRAFT
                          (LIMA).
   236   0401218F        KC-135S........
   237   0401219F        KC-10S.........
   238   0401314F        OPERATIONAL              44,553          44,553
                          SUPPORT
                          AIRLIFT.
   239   0408011F        SPECIAL TACTICS           6,213           6,213
                          / COMBAT
                          CONTROL.
   240   0702207F        DEPOT                     1,605           1,605
                          MAINTENANCE
                          (NON-IF).
   241   0708012F        LOGISTICS
                          SUPPORT
                          ACTIVITIES.
   242   0708610F        LOGISTICS                95,238          95,238
                          INFORMATION
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (LOGIT).
   243   0708611F        SUPPORT SYSTEMS          10,925          10,925
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   244   0804743F        OTHER FLIGHT              1,347           1,347
                          TRAINING.
   245   0808716F        OTHER PERSONNEL              65              65
                          ACTIVITIES.
   246   0901202F        JOINT PERSONNEL           1,083           1,083
                          RECOVERY
                          AGENCY.
   247   0901218F        CIVILIAN                  1,577           1,577
                          COMPENSATION
                          PROGRAM.
   248   0901220F        PERSONNEL                 5,990           5,990
                          ADMINISTRATION.
   249   0901226F        AIR FORCE                   786             786
                          STUDIES AND
                          ANALYSIS
                          AGENCY.
   250   0901279F        FACILITIES                  654             654
                          OPERATION--ADM
                          INISTRATIVE.
   251   0901538F        FINANCIAL               135,735         135,735
                          MANAGEMENT
                          INFORMATION
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   252   0902998F        MANAGEMENT HQ--
                          ADP SUPPORT
                          (AF).
  252A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED           11,874,528      11,894,528
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Program                            [20,000]
                             Increase.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL          16,297,542      16,343,542
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           25,702,946      25,778,946
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, AF.
         ..............
         ..............  RESEARCH,
                          DEVELOPMENT,
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          DW
         ..............  BASIC RESEARCH
   001   0601000BR       DTRA BASIC               45,837          45,837
                          RESEARCH
                          INITIATIVE.
   002   0601101E        DEFENSE                 315,033         315,033
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCES.
   003   0601110D8Z      BASIC RESEARCH           11,171          11,171
                          INITIATIVES.
   004   0601117E        BASIC                    49,500          49,500
                          OPERATIONAL
                          MEDICAL
                          RESEARCH
                          SCIENCE.
   005   0601120D8Z      NATIONAL                 84,271          89,271
                          DEFENSE
                          EDUCATION
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Restore PK-                         [5,000]
                             12 funding.
   006   0601228D8Z      HISTORICALLY             30,895          35,895
                          BLACK COLLEGES
                          AND
                          UNIVERSITIES/
                          MINORITY
                          INSTITUTIONS.
         ..............      Program                             [5,000]
                             increase.
   007   0601384BP       CHEMICAL AND             51,426          51,426
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             588,133         598,133
                            BASIC
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  APPLIED
                          RESEARCH
   008   0602000D8Z      JOINT MUNITIONS          20,065          13,565
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............      Decrease to                        [-6,500]
                             insensitive
                             munitions
                             program.
   009   0602115E        BIOMEDICAL              114,790         114,790
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   010   0602228D8Z      HISTORICALLY
                          BLACK COLLEGES
                          AND
                          UNIVERSITIES
                          (HBCU) SCIENCE.
   011   0602234D8Z      LINCOLN                  46,875          46,875
                          LABORATORY
                          RESEARCH
                          PROGRAM.
   012   0602250D8Z      SYSTEMS 2020
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   013   0602251D8Z      APPLIED                  45,000          45,000
                          RESEARCH FOR
                          THE
                          ADVANCEMENT OF
                          S&T PRIORITIES.
   014   0602303E        INFORMATION &           413,260         413,260
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   015   0602304E        COGNITIVE                16,330          16,330
                          COMPUTING
                          SYSTEMS.
   016   0602305E        MACHINE
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   017   0602383E        BIOLOGICAL               24,537          24,537
                          WARFARE
                          DEFENSE.
   018   0602384BP       CHEMICAL AND            227,065         217,065
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Program                           [-10,000]
                             decrease.
   019   0602663D8Z      DATA TO
                          DECISIONS
                          APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   020   0602668D8Z      CYBER SECURITY           18,908          18,908
                          RESEARCH.
   021   0602670D8Z      HUMAN, SOCIAL
                          AND CULTURE
                          BEHAVIOR
                          MODELING
                          (HSCB) APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   022   0602702E        TACTICAL                225,977         225,977
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   023   0602715E        MATERIALS AND           166,654         166,654
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   024   0602716E        ELECTRONICS             243,469         243,469
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   025   0602718BR       WEAPONS OF MASS         175,282         175,282
                          DESTRUCTION
                          DEFEAT
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   026   0602751D8Z      SOFTWARE                 11,107          11,107
                          ENGINEERING
                          INSTITUTE
                          (SEI) APPLIED
                          RESEARCH.
   027   1160401BB       SPECIAL                  29,246          29,246
                          OPERATIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           1,778,565       1,762,065
                            APPLIED
                            RESEARCH.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
   028   0603000D8Z      JOINT MUNITIONS          26,646          26,646
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   029   0603121D8Z      SO/LIC ADVANCED          19,420          19,920
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............      Program                               [500]
                             increase
                             for future
                             information
                             operations
                             strategy.
   030   0603122D8Z      COMBATING                77,792          77,792
                          TERRORISM
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          SUPPORT.
   031   0603160BR       COUNTERPROLIFER         274,033         274,033
                          ATION
                          INITIATIVES--P
                          ROLIFERATION
                          PREVENTION AND
                          DEFEAT.
   032   0603175C        BALLISTIC               309,203         239,203
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............      Decrease in                       [-70,000]
                             funding of
                             Common Kill
                             Vehicle
                             Technology
                             Program.
   033   0603200D8Z      JOINT ADVANCED
                          CONCEPTS.
   034   0603225D8Z      JOINT DOD-DOE            19,305          19,305
                          MUNITIONS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   035   0603264S        AGILE                     7,565           7,565
                          TRANSPORTATION
                          FOR THE 21ST
                          CENTURY
                          (AT21)--THEATE
                          R CAPABILITY.
   036   0603274C        SPECIAL                  40,426          40,426
                          PROGRAM--MDA
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   037   0603286E        ADVANCED                149,804         149,804
                          AEROSPACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   038   0603287E        SPACE PROGRAMS          172,546         172,546
                          AND TECHNOLOGY.
   039   0603384BP       CHEMICAL AND            170,847         170,847
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM--ADVAN
                          CED
                          DEVELOPMENT.

[[Page 9013]]

 
   040   0603618D8Z      JOINT                     9,009           9,009
                          ELECTRONIC
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   041   0603648D8Z      JOINT                   174,428         167,428
                          CAPABILITY
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
         ..............      Decrease to                        [-7,000]
                             Strategic
                             Capabilitie
                             s Office
                             efforts.
   042   0603662D8Z      NETWORKED                20,000          20,000
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          CAPABILITIES.
   043   0603663D8Z      DATA TO
                          DECISIONS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   044   0603665D8Z      BIOMETRICS
                          SCIENCE AND
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   045   0603668D8Z      CYBER SECURITY           19,668          19,668
                          ADVANCED
                          RESEARCH.
   046   0603670D8Z      HUMAN, SOCIAL
                          AND CULTURE
                          BEHAVIOR
                          MODELING
                          (HSCB)
                          ADVANCED
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   047   0603680D8Z      DEFENSE-WIDE             34,041          34,041
                          MANUFACTURING
                          SCIENCE AND
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          PROGRAM.
   048   0603699D8Z      EMERGING                 61,971          53,971
                          CAPABILITIES
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............      Decrease to                        [-8,000]
                             Strategic
                             Capabilitie
                             s Office
                             efforts.
   049   0603711D8Z      JOINT ROBOTICS
                          PROGRAM/
                          AUTONOMOUS
                          SYSTEMS.
   050   0603712S        GENERIC                  20,000          20,000
                          LOGISTICS R&D
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
   051   0603713S        DEPLOYMENT AND           30,256          30,256
                          DISTRIBUTION
                          ENTERPRISE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   052   0603716D8Z      STRATEGIC                72,324          72,324
                          ENVIRONMENTAL
                          RESEARCH
                          PROGRAM.
   053   0603720S        MICROELECTRONIC          82,700          82,700
                          S TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND SUPPORT.
   054   0603727D8Z      JOINT                     8,431           8,431
                          WARFIGHTING
                          PROGRAM.
   055   0603739E        ADVANCED                117,080         117,080
                          ELECTRONICS
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   056   0603755D8Z      HIGH
                          PERFORMANCE
                          COMPUTING
                          MODERNIZATION
                          PROGRAM.
   057   0603760E        COMMAND,                239,078         239,078
                          CONTROL AND
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          SYSTEMS.
   058   0603765E        CLASSIFIED
                          DARPA PROGRAMS.
   059   0603766E        NETWORK-CENTRIC         259,006         259,006
                          WARFARE
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   060   0603767E        SENSOR                  286,364         286,364
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   061   0603769SE       DISTRIBUTED              12,116          12,116
                          LEARNING
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   062   0603781D8Z      SOFTWARE                 19,008          19,008
                          ENGINEERING
                          INSTITUTE.
   063   0603826D8Z      QUICK REACTION           78,532          78,532
                          SPECIAL
                          PROJECTS.
   064   0603828D8Z      JOINT
                          EXPERIMENTATIO
                          N.
   065   0603828J        JOINT                    12,667          12,667
                          EXPERIMENTATIO
                          N.
   066   0603832D8Z      DOD MODELING             41,370          41,370
                          AND SIMULATION
                          MANAGEMENT
                          OFFICE.
   067   0603901C        DIRECTED ENERGY
                          RESEARCH.
   068   0603902C        NEXT GENERATION
                          AEGIS MISSILE.
   069   0603941D8Z      TEST &                   92,508          92,508
                          EVALUATION
                          SCIENCE &
                          TECHNOLOGY.
   070   0604055D8Z      OPERATIONAL              52,001          60,001
                          ENERGY
                          CAPABILITY
                          IMPROVEMENT.
         ..............      Operational                         [8,000]
                             Energy
                             Capability
                             Improvement
                             Fund.
   071   0303310D8Z      CWMD SYSTEMS...          52,053          52,053
   072   1160402BB       SPECIAL                  46,809          46,809
                          OPERATIONS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   073   1160422BB       AVIATION
                          ENGINEERING
                          ANALYSIS.
   074   1160472BB       SOF INFORMATION
                          AND BROADCAST
                          SYSTEMS
                          ADVANCED
                          TECHNOLOGY.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           3,109,007       3,032,507
                            ADVANCED
                            TECHNOLOGY
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............  ADVANCED
                          COMPONENT
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND PROTOTYPES
   075   0603161D8Z      NUCLEAR AND              63,641          63,641
                          CONVENTIONAL
                          PHYSICAL
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT
                          RDT&E ADC&P.
   076   0603527D8Z      RETRACT LARCH..          19,152          19,152
   077   0603600D8Z      WALKOFF........          70,763          70,763
   078   0603709D8Z      JOINT ROBOTICS
                          PROGRAM.
   079   0603714D8Z      ADVANCED                 17,230          17,230
                          SENSORS
                          APPLICATION
                          PROGRAM.
   080   0603851D8Z      ENVIRONMENTAL            71,453          71,453
                          SECURITY
                          TECHNICAL
                          CERTIFICATION
                          PROGRAM.
   081   0603881C        BALLISTIC               268,990         268,990
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          TERMINAL
                          DEFENSE
                          SEGMENT.
   082   0603882C        BALLISTIC             1,033,903       1,174,303
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          MIDCOURSE
                          DEFENSE
                          SEGMENT.
         ..............      Planning                           [50,000]
                             and Design
                             (35% to
                             100%
                             design).
         ..............      RDT&E                              [70,000]
                             Ground
                             Systems
                             Development.
         ..............      RDT&E Site                         [20,400]
                             Activities,
                             including
                             EIS.
  082A   0603XXXC        COMMON KILL                              70,000
                          VEHICLE
                          TECHNOLOGY AND
                          CAPABILITY
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Common Kill                        [70,000]
                             Vehicle
                             Technology
                             Program.
   083   0603884BP       CHEMICAL AND            196,237         196,237
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM--DEM/
                          VAL.
   084   0603884C        BALLISTIC               315,183         315,183
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          SENSORS.
   085   0603888C        BALLISTIC
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE TEST &
                          TARGETS.
   086   0603890C        BMD ENABLING            377,605         377,605
                          PROGRAMS.
   087   0603891C        SPECIAL                 286,613         286,613
                          PROGRAMS--MDA.
   088   0603892C        AEGIS BMD......         937,056         937,056
   089   0603893C        SPACE TRACKING           44,947          44,947
                          & SURVEILLANCE
                          SYSTEM.
   090   0603895C        BALLISTIC                 6,515           6,515
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE SYSTEM
                          SPACE PROGRAMS.
   091   0603896C        BALLISTIC               418,355         418,355
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          COMMAND AND
                          CONTROL,
                          BATTLE
                          MANAGEMENT AND
                          COMMUNICATI.
   092   0603898C        BALLISTIC                47,419          47,419
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE JOINT
                          WARFIGHTER
                          SUPPORT.
   093   0603904C        MISSILE DEFENSE          52,131          52,131
                          INTEGRATION &
                          OPERATIONS
                          CENTER (MDIOC).
   094   0603906C        REGARDING                13,864          13,864
                          TRENCH.
   095   0603907C        SEA BASED X-             44,478          44,478
                          BAND RADAR
                          (SBX).
   096   0603913C        ISRAELI                  95,782         283,782
                          COOPERATIVE
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............      Development                        [15,000]
                             of
                             increased
                             capabilitie
                             s for Iron
                             Dome.
         ..............      Increase                          [173,000]
                             Israeli
                             Cooperative
                             Programs.
   097   0603914C        BALLISTIC               375,866         375,866
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE TEST.
   098   0603915C        BALLISTIC               495,257         495,257
                          MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          TARGETS.
   099   0603920D8Z      HUMANITARIAN             11,704          11,704
                          DEMINING.
   100   0603923D8Z      COALITION                 9,842           9,842
                          WARFARE.
   101   0604016D8Z      DEPARTMENT OF             3,312          13,312
                          DEFENSE
                          CORROSION
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Corrosion                          [10,000]
                             Prevention,
                             Control,
                             and
                             Mitigation.
   102   0604250D8Z      ADVANCED                130,000          25,000
                          INNOVATIVE
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
         ..............      Decrease to                      [-105,000]
                             SCO efforts.

[[Page 9014]]

 
   103   0604400D8Z      DEPARTMENT OF             8,300           8,300
                          DEFENSE (DOD)
                          UNMANNED
                          AIRCRAFT
                          SYSTEM (UAS)
                          COMMON
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   104   0604445J        WIDE AREA                30,000          30,000
                          SURVEILLANCE.
   105   0604670D8Z      HUMAN, SOCIAL
                          AND CULTURE
                          BEHAVIOR
                          MODELING
                          (HSCB)
                          RESEARCH AND
                          ENGINEERING.
   106   0604775D8Z      DEFENSE RAPID                           250,000
                          INNOVATION
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Rapid                             [250,000]
                             Innovation
                             Program.
   107   0604787D8Z      JOINT SYSTEMS
                          INTEGRATION
                          COMMAND (JSIC).
   108   0604787J        JOINT SYSTEMS             7,402           7,402
                          INTEGRATION.
   109   0604828D8Z      JOINT FIRES
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY TEAM.
   110   0604828J        JOINT FIRES               7,506           7,506
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY TEAM.
   111   0604880C        LAND-BASED SM-3         129,374         129,374
                          (LBSM3).
   112   0604881C        AEGIS SM-3              308,522         308,522
                          BLOCK IIA CO-
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   113   0604883C        PRECISION
                          TRACKING SPACE
                          SYSTEM.
   114   0604886C        ADVANCED REMOTE
                          SENSOR
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          (ARST).
   115   0303191D8Z      JOINT                     3,169           3,169
                          ELECTROMAGNETI
                          C TECHNOLOGY
                          (JET) PROGRAM.
   116   0305103C        CYBER SECURITY              946             946
                          INITIATIVE.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           5,902,517       6,455,917
                            ADVANCED
                            COMPONENT
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            AND
                            PROTOTYPES.
         ..............
         ..............  SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATION
   117   0604051D8Z      DEFENSE
                          ACQUISITION
                          CHALLENGE
                          PROGRAM (DACP).
   118   0604161D8Z      NUCLEAR AND               8,155           8,155
                          CONVENTIONAL
                          PHYSICAL
                          SECURITY
                          EQUIPMENT
                          RDT&E SDD.
   119   0604165D8Z      PROMPT GLOBAL            65,440          65,440
                          STRIKE
                          CAPABILITY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   120   0604384BP       CHEMICAL AND            451,306         451,306
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM--EMD.
   121   0604709D8Z      JOINT ROBOTICS
                          PROGRAM--EMD.
   122   0604764K        ADVANCED IT              29,138          29,138
                          SERVICES JOINT
                          PROGRAM OFFICE
                          (AITS-JPO).
   123   0604771D8Z      JOINT TACTICAL           19,475          19,475
                          INFORMATION
                          DISTRIBUTION
                          SYSTEM (JTIDS).
   124   0605000BR       WEAPONS OF MASS          12,901          12,901
                          DESTRUCTION
                          DEFEAT
                          CAPABILITIES.
   125   0605013BL       INFORMATION              13,812          13,812
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   126   0605021SE       HOMELAND                    386             386
                          PERSONNEL
                          SECURITY
                          INITIATIVE.
   127   0605022D8Z      DEFENSE                   3,763           3,763
                          EXPORTABILITY
                          PROGRAM.
   128   0605027D8Z      OUSD(C) IT                6,788           6,788
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          INITIATIVES.
   129   0605070S        DOD ENTERPRISE           27,917          27,917
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          AND
                          DEMONSTRATION.
   130   0605075D8Z      DCMO POLICY AND          22,297          22,297
                          INTEGRATION.
   131   0605080S        DEFENSE AGENCY           51,689          51,689
                          INTIATIVES
                          (DAI)--FINANCI
                          AL SYSTEM.
   132   0605210D8Z      DEFENSE-WIDE              6,184           6,184
                          ELECTRONIC
                          PROCUREMENT
                          CAPABILITIES.
   133   0303141K        GLOBAL COMBAT            12,083          12,083
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
   134   0305304D8Z      DOD ENTERPRISE            3,302           3,302
                          ENERGY
                          INFORMATION
                          MANAGEMENT
                          (EEIM).
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             734,636         734,636
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
                            AND
                            DEMONSTRATIO
                            N.
         ..............
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   135   0604774D8Z      DEFENSE                   6,393           6,393
                          READINESS
                          REPORTING
                          SYSTEM (DRRS).
   136   0604875D8Z      JOINT SYSTEMS             2,479           2,479
                          ARCHITECTURE
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   137   0604940D8Z      CENTRAL TEST            240,213         240,213
                          AND EVALUATION
                          INVESTMENT
                          DEVELOPMENT
                          (CTEIP).
   138   0604942D8Z      ASSESSMENTS AND           2,127           2,127
                          EVALUATIONS.
   139   0604943D8Z      THERMAL VICAR..           8,287           8,287
   140   0605100D8Z      JOINT MISSION            31,000          31,000
                          ENVIRONMENT
                          TEST
                          CAPABILITY
                          (JMETC).
   141   0605104D8Z      TECHNICAL                24,379          24,379
                          STUDIES,
                          SUPPORT AND
                          ANALYSIS.
   142   0605110D8Z      USD(A&T)--
                          CRITICAL
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          SUPPORT.
   143   0605117D8Z      FOREIGN                  54,311          54,311
                          MATERIEL
                          ACQUISITION
                          AND
                          EXPLOITATION.
   144   0605126J        JOINT                    47,462          47,462
                          INTEGRATED AIR
                          AND MISSILE
                          DEFENSE
                          ORGANIZATION
                          (JIAMDO).
   145   0605128D8Z      CLASSIFIED
                          PROGRAM USD(P).
   146   0605130D8Z      FOREIGN                  12,134          12,134
                          COMPARATIVE
                          TESTING.
   147   0605142D8Z      SYSTEMS                  44,237          44,237
                          ENGINEERING.
   148   0605151D8Z      STUDIES AND               5,871           5,871
                          ANALYSIS
                          SUPPORT--OSD.
   149   0605161D8Z      NUCLEAR MATTERS-          5,028           5,028
                          PHYSICAL
                          SECURITY.
   150   0605170D8Z      SUPPORT TO                6,301           6,301
                          NETWORKS AND
                          INFORMATION
                          INTEGRATION.
   151   0605200D8Z      GENERAL SUPPORT           6,504           6,504
                          TO USD
                          (INTELLIGENCE).
   152   0605384BP       CHEMICAL AND             92,046          92,046
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          PROGRAM.
   153   0605502BR       SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATION
                          RESEARCH.
   154   0605502C        SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATION
                          RESEARCH--MDA.
   155   0605502D8Z      SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH.
   156   0605502E        SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH.
   157   0605502S        SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH.
   158   0605790D8Z      SMALL BUSINESS            1,868           1,868
                          INNOVATION
                          RESEARCH
                          (SBIR)/ SMALL
                          BUSINESS
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          TRANSFER (S.
   159   0605798D8Z      DEFENSE                   8,362           8,362
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          ANALYSIS.
   160   0605801KA       DEFENSE                  56,024          56,024
                          TECHNICAL
                          INFORMATION
                          CENTER (DTIC).
   161   0605803SE       R&D IN SUPPORT            6,908           6,908
                          OF DOD
                          ENLISTMENT,
                          TESTING AND
                          EVALUATION.
   162   0605804D8Z      DEVELOPMENT              15,451          19,451
                          TEST AND
                          EVALUATION.
         ..............      Program                             [4,000]
                             increase.
   163   0605897E        DARPA AGENCY
                          RELOCATION.
   164   0605898E        MANAGEMENT HQ--          71,659          71,659
                          R&D.
   165   0606100D8Z      BUDGET AND                4,083           4,083
                          PROGRAM
                          ASSESSMENTS.
   166   0606301D8Z      AVIATION SAFETY
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
   167   0203345D8Z      DEFENSE                   5,306           5,306
                          OPERATIONS
                          SECURITY
                          INITIATIVE
                          (DOSI).
   168   0204571J        JOINT STAFF               2,097           2,097
                          ANALYTICAL
                          SUPPORT.
   171   0303166D8Z      SUPPORT TO
                          INFORMATION
                          OPERATIONS
                          (IO)
                          CAPABILITIES.
   172   0303166J        SUPPORT TO                8,394           8,394
                          INFORMATION
                          OPERATIONS
                          (IO)
                          CAPABILITIES.

[[Page 9015]]

 
   173   0303169D8Z      INFORMATION
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          RAPID
                          ACQUISITION.
   174   0305103E        CYBER SECURITY
                          INITIATIVE.
   175   0305193D8Z      CYBER                     7,624           7,624
                          INTELLIGENCE.
   177   0305400D8Z      WARFIGHTING AND
                          INTELLIGENCE-
                          RELATED
                          SUPPORT.
   178   0804767D8Z      COCOM EXERCISE           43,247          43,247
                          ENGAGEMENT AND
                          TRAINING
                          TRANSFORMATION
                          (CE2T2).
   179   0901598C        MANAGEMENT HQ--          37,712          37,712
                          MDA.
   180   0901598D8W      MANAGEMENT                  607             607
                          HEADQUARTERS
                          WHS.
   181   0909999D8Z      FINANCING FOR
                          CANCELLED
                          ACCOUNT
                          ADJUSTMENTS.
  181A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED               54,914          54,914
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             913,028         917,028
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEM
                          DEVELOPMENT
   182   0604130V        ENTERPRISE                7,552           7,552
                          SECURITY
                          SYSTEM (ESS).
   183   0605127T        REGIONAL                  3,270           3,270
                          INTERNATIONAL
                          OUTREACH (RIO)
                          AND
                          PARTNERSHIP
                          FOR PEACE
                          INFORMATION
                          MANA.
   184   0605147T        OVERSEAS                    287             287
                          HUMANITARIAN
                          ASSISTANCE
                          SHARED
                          INFORMATION
                          SYSTEM
                          (OHASIS).
   185   0607210D8Z      INDUSTRIAL BASE          14,000          14,000
                          ANALYSIS AND
                          SUSTAINMENT
                          SUPPORT.
   186   0607310D8Z      OPERATIONAL               1,955           1,955
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   187   0607327T        GLOBAL THEATER           13,250          13,250
                          SECURITY
                          COOPERATION
                          MANAGEMENT
                          INFORMATION
                          SYSTEMS (G-
                          TSCMIS).
   188   0607384BP       CHEMICAL AND             13,026          13,026
                          BIOLOGICAL
                          DEFENSE
                          (OPERATIONAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT).
   189   0607828D8Z      JOINT
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY.
   190   0607828J        JOINT                    12,652          12,652
                          INTEGRATION
                          AND
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY.
   191   0208043J        PLANNING AND              3,061           3,061
                          DECISION AID
                          SYSTEM (PDAS).
   192   0208045K        C4I                      72,726          72,726
                          INTEROPERABILI
                          TY.
   194   0301144K        JOINT/ALLIED              6,524           6,524
                          COALITION
                          INFORMATION
                          SHARING.
   201   0302016K        NATIONAL                    512             512
                          MILITARY
                          COMMAND SYSTEM-
                          WIDE SUPPORT.
   202   0302019K        DEFENSE INFO             12,867          12,867
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          ENGINEERING
                          AND
                          INTEGRATION.
   203   0303126K        LONG-HAUL                36,565          36,565
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          -DCS.
   204   0303131K        MINIMUM                  13,144          13,144
                          ESSENTIAL
                          EMERGENCY
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          NETWORK
                          (MEECN).
   205   0303135G        PUBLIC KEY                1,060           1,060
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          (PKI).
   206   0303136G        KEY MANAGEMENT           33,279          33,279
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          (KMI).
   207   0303140D8Z      INFORMATION              10,673          10,673
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   208   0303140G        INFORMATION             181,567         179,291
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
         ..............      Excess to                          [-2,276]
                             need.
   209   0303140K        INFORMATION
                          SYSTEMS
                          SECURITY
                          PROGRAM.
   210   0303150K        GLOBAL COMMAND           34,288          34,288
                          AND CONTROL
                          SYSTEM.
   211   0303153K        DEFENSE                   7,741           7,741
                          SPECTRUM
                          ORGANIZATION.
   212   0303170K        NET-CENTRIC               3,325           3,325
                          ENTERPRISE
                          SERVICES
                          (NCES).
   213   0303260D8Z      DEFENSE                   1,246           1,246
                          MILITARY
                          DECEPTION
                          PROGRAM OFFICE
                          (DMDPO).
   214   0303610K        TELEPORT                  5,147           5,147
                          PROGRAM.
   216   0304210BB       SPECIAL                  17,352          17,352
                          APPLICATIONS
                          FOR
                          CONTINGENCIES.
   220   0305103K        CYBER SECURITY            3,658           3,658
                          INITIATIVE.
   221   0305125D8Z      CRITICAL                  9,752           9,752
                          INFRASTRUCTURE
                          PROTECTION
                          (CIP).
   225   0305186D8Z      POLICY R&D                3,210           3,210
                          PROGRAMS.
   227   0305199D8Z      NET CENTRICITY.          21,602          21,602
   230   0305208BB       DISTRIBUTED               5,195           5,195
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   233   0305208K        DISTRIBUTED               3,348           3,348
                          COMMON GROUND/
                          SURFACE
                          SYSTEMS.
   235   0305219BB       MQ-1 PREDATOR A             641             641
                          UAV.
   237   0305231BB       MQ-8 UAV.......
   238   0305387D8Z      HOMELAND                  2,338           2,338
                          DEFENSE
                          TECHNOLOGY
                          TRANSFER
                          PROGRAM.
   239   0305600D8Z      INTERNATIONAL             4,372           4,372
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          TECHNOLOGY AND
                          ARCHITECTURES.
   244   0305889G        COUNTERDRUG
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SUPPORT.
   247   0708011S        INDUSTRIAL               24,691          24,691
                          PREPAREDNESS.
   248   0708012S        LOGISTICS                 4,659           4,659
                          SUPPORT
                          ACTIVITIES.
   249   0902298J        MANAGEMENT HQ--           3,533           3,533
                          OJCS.
   250   1105219BB       MQ-9 UAV.......           1,314           1,314
   251   1105232BB       RQ-11 UAV......
   252   1105233BB       RQ-7 UAV.......
   253   1160279BB       SMALL BUSINESS
                          INNOVATIVE
                          RESEARCH/SMALL
                          BUS TECH
                          TRANSFER PILOT
                          PROG.
   254   1160403BB       AVIATION                156,561         156,561
                          SYSTEMS.
   255   1160404BB       SPECIAL
                          OPERATIONS
                          TACTICAL
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   256   1160405BB       SPECIAL                   7,705           7,705
                          OPERATIONS
                          INTELLIGENCE
                          SYSTEMS
                          DEVELOPMENT.
   257   1160408BB       SOF OPERATIONAL          42,620          42,620
                          ENHANCEMENTS.
   258   1160421BB       SPECIAL
                          OPERATIONS CV-
                          22 DEVELOPMENT.
   259   1160427BB       MISSION
                          TRAINING AND
                          PREPARATION
                          SYSTEMS (MTPS).
   260   1160429BB       AC/MC-130J.....
   261   1160431BB       WARRIOR SYSTEMS          17,970          17,970
   262   1160432BB       SPECIAL                   7,424           7,424
                          PROGRAMS.
   263   1160474BB       SOF
                          COMMUNICATIONS
                          EQUIPMENT AND
                          ELECTRONICS
                          SYSTEMS.
   264   1160476BB       SOF TACTICAL
                          RADIO SYSTEMS.
   265   1160477BB       SOF WEAPONS
                          SYSTEMS.
   266   1160478BB       SOF SOLDIER
                          PROTECTION AND
                          SURVIVAL
                          SYSTEMS.
   267   1160479BB       SOF VISUAL
                          AUGMENTATION,
                          LASERS AND
                          SENSOR SYSTEMS.
   268   1160480BB       SOF TACTICAL              2,206           2,206
                          VEHICLES.
   269   1160481BB       SOF MUNITIONS..
   270   1160482BB       SOF ROTARY WING
                          AVIATION.
   271   1160483BB       MARITIME                 18,325          18,325
                          SYSTEMS.
   272   1160484BB       SOF SURFACE
                          CRAFT.

[[Page 9016]]

 
   273   1160488BB       SOF MILITARY
                          INFORMATION
                          SUPPORT
                          OPERATIONS.
   274   1160489BB       SOF GLOBAL                3,304           3,304
                          VIDEO
                          SURVEILLANCE
                          ACTIVITIES.
   275   1160490BB       SOF OPERATIONAL          16,021          16,021
                          ENHANCEMENTS
                          INTELLIGENCE.
  275A   9999999999      CLASSIFIED            3,773,704       3,773,704
                          PROGRAMS.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL           4,641,222       4,638,946
                            OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           17,667,108      18,139,232
                              RESEARCH,
                              DEVELOPMEN
                              T, TEST &
                              EVAL, DW.
         ..............
         ..............  OPERATIONAL
                          TEST & EVAL,
                          DEFENSE
         ..............  MANAGEMENT
                          SUPPORT
   001   0605118OTE      OPERATIONAL              75,720          75,720
                          TEST AND
                          EVALUATION.
   002   0605131OTE      LIVE FIRE TEST           48,423          48,423
                          AND EVALUATION.
   003   0605814OTE      OPERATIONAL              62,157          62,157
                          TEST
                          ACTIVITIES AND
                          ANALYSES.
         ..............     SUBTOTAL             186,300         186,300
                            MANAGEMENT
                            SUPPORT.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL              186,300         186,300
                              OPERATIONA
                              L TEST &
                              EVAL,
                              DEFENSE.
         ..............
         ..............       TOTAL           67,520,236      68,079,460
                              RDT&E.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR 
                   OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
   SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS
            CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               FY 2014         House
  Line    Program Element        Item          Request      Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         ................  SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT &
                            DEMONSTRATION
   087   0604622A          FAMILY OF HEAVY         7,000           7,000
                            TACTICAL
                            VEHICLES.
         ................     SUBTOTAL             7,000           7,000
                              SYSTEM
                              DEVELOPMENT &
                              DEMONSTRATION.
         ................
         ................       TOTAL              7,000           7,000
                                RESEARCH,
                                DEVELOPMENT
                                , TEST &
                                EVAL, ARMY.
         ................
         ................  OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT
  224A   9999999999        CLASSIFIED             34,426          34,426
                            PROGRAMS.
         ................     SUBTOTAL            34,426          34,426
                              OPERATIONAL
                              SYSTEMS
                              DEVELOPMENT.
         ................
         ................       TOTAL             34,426          34,426
                                RESEARCH,
                                DEVELOPMENT
                                , TEST &
                                EVAL, NAVY.
         ................
         ................  OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEMS
                            DEVELOPMENT
  252A   9999999999        CLASSIFIED              9,000           9,000
                            PROGRAMS.
         ................     SUBTOTAL             9,000           9,000
                              OPERATIONAL
                              SYSTEMS
                              DEVELOPMENT.
         ................
         ................       TOTAL              9,000           9,000
                                RESEARCH,
                                DEVELOPMENT
                                , TEST &
                                EVAL, AF.
         ................
         ................  OPERATIONAL
                            SYSTEM
                            DEVELOPMENT
  275A   9999999999        CLASSIFIED             66,208          66,208
                            PROGRAMS.
         ................     SUBTOTAL            66,208          66,208
                              OPERATIONAL
                              SYSTEM
                              DEVELOPMENT.
         ................
         ................       TOTAL             66,208          66,208
                                RESEARCH,
                                DEVELOPMENT
                                , TEST &
                                EVAL, DW.
         ................
         ................       TOTAL RDT&E      116,634         116,634
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

     SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      FY 2014          House
    Line                                     Item                                     Request       Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS.....................................................         888,114       1,096,714
                 Missile Defense Deployment to Guam.............................                        [13,100]
                 Restore Army OPTEMPO to 90%....................................                       [195,500]
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...........................................          72,624          72,624
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.............................................         617,402         617,402
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...............................................         602,262         602,262
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....................................       1,032,484       1,032,484
       060   AVIATION ASSETS....................................................       1,287,462       1,303,262
                 Restore Army Flying Hour Program to 90%........................                        [15,800]
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................       3,559,656       3,559,656
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS......................................         454,477         454,477

[[Page 9017]]

 
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................       1,481,156       1,481,156
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................       7,278,154       7,278,154
       110   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................       2,754,712       3,011,712
                 Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations..........                       [-25,000]
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                       [282,000]
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S....................................         425,271         425,271
       130   COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS...............................         185,064         185,064
       170   COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS............................         463,270         456,594
                 Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations.................                         [3,100]
                 Unjustified EUCOM Growth.......................................                        [-9,776]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................      21,102,108      21,576,832
 
             MOBILIZATION
       180   STRATEGIC MOBILITY.................................................         360,240         360,240
       190   ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS.........................................         192,105         192,105
       200   INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS............................................           7,101           7,101
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..........................................         559,446         559,446
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       210   OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................         115,992         115,992
       220   RECRUIT TRAINING...................................................          52,323          52,323
       230   ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING..........................................          43,589          43,589
       240   SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS.............................         453,745         453,745
       250   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.........................................       1,034,495       1,034,495
       260   FLIGHT TRAINING....................................................       1,016,876       1,016,876
       270   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION.................................         186,565         186,565
       280   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................         652,514         652,514
       290   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................         485,500         485,500
       300   EXAMINING..........................................................         170,912         170,912
       310   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION...................................         251,523         251,523
       320   CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING....................................         184,422         184,422
       330   JUNIOR ROTC........................................................         181,105         181,105
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................       4,829,561       4,829,561
 
             ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
       350   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................         690,089         690,089
       360   CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES..........................................         774,120         779,120
                 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation..................                         [5,000]
       370   LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES........................................         651,765         651,765
       380   AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT..............................................         453,051         453,051
       390   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................         487,737         487,737
       400   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................       1,563,115       1,563,115
       410   MANPOWER MANAGEMENT................................................         326,853         326,853
       420   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT............................................         234,364         234,364
       430   OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT..............................................       1,212,091       1,212,091
       440   ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES.............................................         243,540         243,540
       450   REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT.............................................         241,101         241,101
       460   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................         226,291         226,291
       470   SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS.........................................         426,651         457,851
                 Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M                           [31,200]
                 Defense-wide...................................................
       480   MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS.....................................          27,248          24,148
                 Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations.................                        [-3,100]
       525   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................       1,023,946       1,023,946
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES............................       8,581,962       8,615,062
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       530   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                        -740,300
                 Average civilian end strength above projection.................                      [-284,300]
                 Unobligated balances...........................................                      [-456,000]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                        -740,300
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY...........................      35,073,077      34,840,601
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS.....................................................           1,621           1,621
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...........................................          24,429          24,429
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.............................................         657,099         657,099
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...............................................         122,485         122,485
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....................................         584,058         584,058
       060   AVIATION ASSETS....................................................          79,380          79,380
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................         471,616         471,616
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS......................................          74,243          74,243
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................          70,894          70,894
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................         569,801         569,801
       110   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         294,145         323,245
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                        [29,100]
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S....................................          51,853          51,853
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       3,001,624       3,030,724

[[Page 9018]]

 
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       130   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................          10,735          10,735
       140   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................          24,197          24,197
       150   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................          10,304          10,304
       160   MANPOWER MANAGEMENT................................................          10,319          10,319
       170   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................          37,857          37,857
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................          93,412          93,412
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES.......................       3,095,036       3,124,136
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS.....................................................         800,880         800,880
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...........................................         178,650         178,650
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.............................................         771,503         771,503
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...............................................          98,699          98,699
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....................................          38,779          38,779
       060   AVIATION ASSETS....................................................         922,503         922,503
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................         761,056         761,056
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS......................................          62,971          62,971
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................         233,105         233,105
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................       1,019,059       1,019,059
       110   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         712,139         786,339
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                        [74,200]
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S....................................       1,013,715       1,013,715
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       6,613,059       6,687,259
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       130   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................          10,812          10,812
       140   REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT.............................................           1,551           1,551
       150   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................          78,284          78,284
       160   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................          46,995          46,995
       170   MANPOWER MANAGEMENT................................................           6,390           6,390
       180   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................         297,105         297,105
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................         441,137         441,137
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG...........................       7,054,196       7,128,396
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS................................       4,952,522       4,952,522
       020   FLEET AIR TRAINING.................................................       1,826,404       1,826,404
       030   AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES.....................          38,639          38,639
       040   AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT..................................          90,030          90,030
       050   AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT................................................         362,700         362,700
       060   AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE.........................................         915,881         915,881
       070   AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................          35,838          35,838
       080   AVIATION LOGISTICS.................................................         379,914         448,414
                 CLS for AVN Logistics..........................................                        [68,500]
       090   MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS..................................       3,884,836       3,884,836
       100   SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING.................................         734,852         734,852
       110   SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............................................       5,191,511       5,191,511
       120   SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT......................................       1,351,274       1,351,274
       130   COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS..............................................         701,316         691,722
                 New START treaty implementation, excluding verification and                            [-9,594]
                 inspection activities..........................................
       140   ELECTRONIC WARFARE.................................................          97,710          97,710
       150   SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE.....................................         172,330         172,330
       160   WARFARE TACTICS....................................................         454,682         454,682
       170   OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY...........................         328,406         328,406
       180   COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES..............................................         946,429         946,429
       190   EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE..............................................         142,249         148,249
                 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation..................                         [6,000]
       200   DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT...........................................           2,603           2,603
       210   COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS...............................         102,970         102,970
       220   COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT........................         199,128         199,128
       230   CRUISE MISSILE.....................................................          92,671          92,671
       240   FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE............................................       1,193,188       1,193,188
       250   IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT.................................         105,985         105,985
       260   WEAPONS MAINTENANCE................................................         532,627         532,627
       270   OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.......................................         304,160         304,160
       280   ENTERPRISE INFORMATION.............................................       1,011,528       1,011,528
       290   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION.........................       1,996,821       2,182,021
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                       [185,200]
       300   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................       4,460,918       4,460,918
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................      32,610,122      32,860,228
 
             MOBILIZATION
       310   SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE......................................         331,576         331,576

[[Page 9019]]

 
       320   AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS.................................           6,638           6,638
       330   SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS.....................................         222,752         222,752
       340   EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS..............................          73,310          73,310
       350   INDUSTRIAL READINESS...............................................           2,675           2,675
       360   COAST GUARD SUPPORT................................................          23,794          23,794
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..........................................         660,745         660,745
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       370   OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................         148,516         148,516
       380   RECRUIT TRAINING...................................................           9,384           9,384
       390   RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS....................................         139,876         139,876
       400   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.........................................         630,069         630,069
       410   FLIGHT TRAINING....................................................           9,294           9,294
       420   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION.................................         169,082         169,082
       430   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................         164,368         164,368
       440   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................         241,733         242,833
                 Naval Sea Cadets...............................................                         [1,100]
       450   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION...................................         139,815         139,815
       460   CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING....................................          94,632          94,632
       470   JUNIOR ROTC........................................................          51,373          51,373
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................       1,798,142       1,799,242
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       480   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................         886,088         886,088
       490   EXTERNAL RELATIONS.................................................          13,131          13,131
       500   CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........................         115,742         115,742
       510   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........................         382,150         382,150
       520   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT............................................         268,403         268,403
       530   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................         317,293         317,293
       550   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................         207,128         207,128
       570   PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN...................................         295,855         295,855
       580   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.................................       1,140,484       1,140,484
       590   HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT............................          52,873          52,873
       600   COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS.............................................          27,587          27,587
       610   SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS...............................          75,728          75,728
       620   NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE........................................         543,026         543,026
       680   INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES............................           4,965           4,965
       705   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................         545,775         545,775
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................       4,876,228       4,876,228
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       710   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                        -278,200
                 Average civilian end strength above projection.................                       [-38,500]
                 Unobligated balances...........................................                      [-239,700]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                        -278,200
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY...........................      39,945,237      39,918,243
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   OPERATIONAL FORCES.................................................         837,012         902,012
                 Crisis Response Force..........................................                        [30,000]
                 Marine Security Guard..........................................                        [35,000]
       020   FIELD LOGISTICS....................................................         894,555         898,555
                 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation..................                         [4,000]
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................         223,337         221,337
                 Unjustified Growth HUMVEE Modifications........................                        [-2,000]
       040   MARITIME PREPOSITIONING............................................          97,878          97,878
       050   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION...........................         774,619         781,719
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                         [7,100]
       060   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................       2,166,661       2,166,661
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       4,994,062       5,068,162
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       070   RECRUIT TRAINING...................................................          17,693          17,693
       080   OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................             896             896
       090   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.........................................         100,806         100,806
       100   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION.................................          46,928          46,928
       110   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................         356,426         356,426
       120   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................         179,747         179,747
       130   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION...................................          52,255          52,255
       140   JUNIOR ROTC........................................................          23,138          23,138
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................         777,889         777,889
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       150   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................          43,816          43,816
       160   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................         305,107         305,107
       180   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.................................          87,500          87,500
       185   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................          46,276          46,276

[[Page 9020]]

 
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................         482,699         482,699
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       190   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                         -50,000
                 Unobligated balances...........................................                       [-50,000]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                         -50,000
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS...................       6,254,650       6,278,750
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS................................         586,620         586,620
       020   INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE...........................................           7,008           7,008
       040   AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE.........................................         100,657         100,657
       050   AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................             305             305
       060   AVIATION LOGISTICS.................................................           3,927           3,927
       070   MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS..................................          75,933          75,933
       080   SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING.................................             601             601
       090   SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............................................          44,364          44,364
       100   COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS..............................................          15,477          15,477
       110   COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES..............................................         115,608         115,608
       120   WEAPONS MAINTENANCE................................................           1,967           1,967
       130   ENTERPRISE INFORMATION.............................................          43,726          43,726
       140   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION.........................          69,011          74,011
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                         [5,000]
       150   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................         109,604         109,604
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       1,174,808       1,179,808
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       160   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................           2,905           2,905
       170   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........................          14,425          14,425
       180   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................           2,485           2,485
       190   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.................................           3,129           3,129
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................          22,944          22,944
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES.......................       1,197,752       1,202,752
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   OPERATING FORCES...................................................          96,244          96,244
       020   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................          17,581          19,081
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance.............................                         [1,500]
       030   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION.........................          32,438          32,738
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                           [300]
       040   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................          95,259          95,259
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................         241,522         243,322
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       050   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................             894             894
       060   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................          11,743          11,743
       070   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................           9,158           9,158
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................          21,795          21,795
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE.....................         263,317         265,117
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES..............................................       3,295,814       3,295,814
       020   COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES..........................................       1,875,095       1,875,095
       030   AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS).....................       1,559,109       1,559,109
       040   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................       5,956,304       5,961,304
                 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation..................                         [5,000]
       050   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................       1,834,424       2,224,454
                 Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls..                       [170,530]
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                       [219,500]
       060   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................       2,779,811       2,779,811
       070   GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING.......................................         913,841         913,841
       080   OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS......................................         916,837         916,837
       100   TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES........................         720,349         720,349
       110   LAUNCH FACILITIES..................................................         305,275         305,275
       120   SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS..............................................         433,658         433,658
       130   COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT........................       1,146,016       1,147,116
                 NORTHCOM VOICE program.........................................                         [1,100]
       140   COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS...............................         231,830         231,830
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................      21,968,363      22,364,493
 
             MOBILIZATION
       150   AIRLIFT OPERATIONS.................................................       2,015,902       2,015,902
       160   MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS..........................................         147,216         147,216

[[Page 9021]]

 
       170   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................       1,556,232       1,556,232
       180   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         167,402         167,402
       190   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................         707,040         707,040
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..........................................       4,593,792       4,593,792
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       200   OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................         102,334         102,334
       210   RECRUIT TRAINING...................................................          17,733          17,733
       220   RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC).............................          94,600          94,600
       230   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         217,011         217,011
       240   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................         800,327         800,327
       250   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.........................................         399,364         399,364
       260   FLIGHT TRAINING....................................................         792,275         792,275
       270   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION.................................         248,958         248,958
       280   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................         106,741         106,741
       290   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................         319,331         319,331
       300   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................         122,736         122,736
       310   EXAMINING..........................................................           3,679           3,679
       320   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION...................................         137,255         137,255
       330   CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING....................................         176,153         176,153
       340   JUNIOR ROTC........................................................          67,018          67,018
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................       3,605,515       3,605,515
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       350   LOGISTICS OPERATIONS...............................................       1,103,684       1,103,684
       360   TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.......................................         919,923         919,923
       370   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................          56,601          52,601
                 Heavy bomber eliminations related to New START treaty                                    [-400]
                 implementation.................................................
                 ICBM reductions related to New START implementation............                        [-3,600]
       380   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         281,061         281,061
       390   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................       1,203,305       1,203,305
       400   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................         593,865         593,865
       410   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................         574,609         574,609
       420   OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.......................................       1,028,600       1,013,200
                 De-MIRVing ICBMs related to New START treaty implementation....                          [-700]
                 ICBM eliminations and Environmental Impact Study related to New                       [-14,700]
                 START treaty implementation....................................
       430   CIVIL AIR PATROL...................................................          24,720          24,720
       460   INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT..............................................          89,008          89,008
       465   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................       1,227,796       1,222,996
                 Classified Adjustment..........................................                        [-4,800]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................       7,103,172       7,078,972
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       470   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                        -205,100
                 Average civilian end strength above projection.................                       [-18,700]
                 Unobligated balances...........................................                      [-186,400]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                        -205,100
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE......................      37,270,842      37,437,672
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES..............................................       1,857,951       1,857,951
       020   MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS.........................................         224,462         224,462
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................         521,182         521,182
       040   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................          89,704          98,804
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                         [9,100]
       050   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................         360,836         360,836
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       3,054,135       3,063,235
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
       060   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................          64,362          64,362
       070   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................          15,056          15,056
       080   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC).............................          23,617          23,617
       090   OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)...............................           6,618           6,618
       100   AUDIOVISUAL........................................................             819             819
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.............         110,472         110,472
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE.....................       3,164,607       3,173,707
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS................................................       3,371,871       3,371,871
       020   MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS.........................................         720,305         720,305
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................       1,514,870       1,514,870
       040   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         296,953         323,853
                 Sustainment to 90%.............................................                        [26,900]
       050   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................         597,303         597,303
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       6,501,302       6,528,202

[[Page 9022]]

 
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES
       060   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................          32,117          32,117
       070   RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING.........................................          32,585          32,585
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES............          64,702          64,702
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG............................       6,566,004       6,592,904
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF..............................................         472,239         472,239
       020   SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.........................................       5,261,463       5,230,711
                 AFSOC Flying Hour Program......................................                        [70,100]
                 International SOF Information Sharing System...................                        [-7,017]
                 Ongoing baseline contingency operations........................                       [-35,519]
                 Pilot program for SOF family members...........................                         [5,000]
                 Preserve the force and families--human performance program.....                       [-16,605]
                 Preserve the force and families--resiliency....................                        [-8,786]
                 Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M,                           [-31,200]
                 Army...........................................................
                 Regional SOF Coordination Centers..............................                       [-14,725]
                 SOCOM National Capitol Region..................................                       [-10,000]
                 USASOC Flying Hour Program.....................................                        [18,000]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       5,733,702       5,702,950
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       040   DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY.....................................         157,397         157,397
       050   NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY........................................          84,899          84,899
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................         242,296         242,296
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
       060   CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS............................................         144,443         165,443
                 STARBASE.......................................................                        [21,000]
       080   DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY......................................         612,207         612,207
       090   DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY.................................       1,378,606       1,378,606
       110   DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY...................................         763,091         763,091
       120   DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY.................................       1,326,243       1,326,243
       140   DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY......................................          29,933          29,933
       150   DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY...........................................         462,545         462,545
       160   DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY.............................................         222,979         222,979
       170   DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE.............................................          21,594          21,594
       180   DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY................................         788,389         788,389
       190   DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE...........................................         546,603         546,603
       210   DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.........................          35,151          35,151
       220   DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY....................................         438,033         438,033
       240   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY...........................       2,713,756       2,713,756
       250   MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY.............................................         256,201         256,201
       270   OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT......................................         371,615         217,715
                 Program reduction..............................................                      [-153,900]
       280   OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.................................       2,010,176       1,992,676
                 BRAC 2015 Initiative...........................................                        [-8,000]
                 Combatant Commanders Exercise Engagement Training                                      [90,500]
                 Transformation.................................................
                 Procurement Technical Assistance Program--Enhanced Business                            [10,000]
                 Support........................................................
                 Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories.........                       [-35,000]
                 Reduction to Building Partnership Capacity authories...........                       [-75,000]
       290   WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES...................................         616,572         616,572
       295   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................      14,283,558      14,287,648
                 Classified adjustment..........................................                         [4,090]
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.............      27,021,695      26,875,385
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       305   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                        -320,000
                 Section 514. Study of Reserve Component General and Flag                                [3,000]
                 Officers.......................................................
                 Section 551. Department of Defense Recognition of Spouses of                            [5,000]
                 Members of Armed Forces who Serve in Combat Zones..............
                 Section 571 .DOD Supplementary Impact Aid......................                        [25,000]
                 Section 621. Expand the victims transitional compensation                              [10,000]
                 benefit........................................................
                 Unobligated balances...........................................                      [-363,000]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                        -320,000
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE...................      32,997,693      32,500,631
 
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
       050   OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID......................         109,500         109,500
       060   COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION.......................................         528,455         528,455
       080   ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD...............................................         256,031         256,031
       090   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY....................................         298,815         298,815
       160   OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND......................           5,000               0
                 Program reduction..............................................                        [-5,000]

[[Page 9023]]

 
                 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS..........................       1,197,801       1,192,801
 
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
       100   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY....................................         316,103         316,103
                 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS..........................         316,103         316,103
 
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
       110   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE...............................         439,820         439,820
                 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS..........................         439,820         439,820
 
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
       040   US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE..................          13,606          12,626
                 Unjustified Growth.............................................                          [-980]
       120   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE.................................          10,757          10,757
                 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS..........................          24,363          23,383
 
             MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
       130   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES......................         237,443         237,443
                 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS..........................         237,443         237,443
 
                  TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS............................       2,215,530       2,209,550
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE.................................     175,097,941     174,672,459
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 
                   OPERATIONS.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      FY 2014          House
    Line                                     Item                                     Request       Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS.....................................................         217,571         247,571
                 Missile Defense Deployment--Other..............................                        [15,000]
                 Missile Defense Deployment to Turkey...........................                        [15,000]
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...........................................           8,266           8,266
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.............................................          56,626          56,626
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...............................................       4,209,942       4,209,942
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....................................         950,567         950,567
       060   AVIATION ASSETS....................................................         474,288         474,288
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................       1,349,152       1,349,152
       080   LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS......................................         655,000         655,000
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................         301,563         796,563
                 Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance........................                       [495,000]
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................         706,214         706,214
       140   ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES..............................................      11,519,498      11,519,498
       150   COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM..............................          60,000          60,000
       160   RESET..............................................................       2,240,358       3,740,358
                 Restore Critical Army Reset....................................                     [1,500,000]
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................      22,749,045      24,774,045
 
             ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
       350   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................       4,601,356       4,601,356
       380   AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT..............................................          17,418          17,418
       400   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................         110,000         110,000
       420   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT............................................          94,820          94,820
       430   OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT..............................................          54,000          54,000
       450   REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT.............................................         250,000         250,000
       525   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................       1,402,994       1,402,994
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES............................       6,530,588       6,530,588
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       530   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                          91,100
                 Increase to support higher fuel rates..........................                        [91,100]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                          91,100
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY...........................      29,279,633      31,395,733
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
             OPERATING FORCES
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.............................................           6,995           6,995
       050   LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.....................................           2,332           2,332
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................             608             608
       090   LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE......................................                          75,800
                 Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance........................                        [75,800]

[[Page 9024]]

 
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................          33,000          33,000
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................          42,935         118,735
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES.......................          42,935         118,735
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MANEUVER UNITS.....................................................          29,314          29,314
       020   MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES...........................................           1,494           1,494
       030   ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE.............................................          15,343          15,343
       040   THEATER LEVEL ASSETS...............................................           1,549           1,549
       060   AVIATION ASSETS....................................................          64,504          64,504
       070   FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................          31,512          31,512
       100   BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT............................................          42,179          42,179
       120   MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S....................................          11,996          11,996
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................         197,891         197,891
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       160   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................           1,480           1,480
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................           1,480           1,480
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG...........................         199,371         199,371
 
             AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND
             MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
       010   SUSTAINMENT........................................................       2,735,603       2,735,603
       020   INFRASTRUCTURE.....................................................         278,650         278,650
       030   EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION.......................................       2,180,382       2,180,382
       040   TRAINING AND OPERATIONS............................................         626,550         626,550
                 SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE...................................       5,821,185       5,821,185
 
             MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
       060   SUSTAINMENT........................................................       1,214,995       1,214,995
       080   EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION.......................................          54,696          54,696
       090   TRAINING AND OPERATIONS............................................         626,119         626,119
                 SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR..................................       1,895,810       1,895,810
 
             DETAINEE OPS
       110   SUSTAINMENT........................................................           7,225           7,225
       140   TRAINING AND OPERATIONS............................................           2,500           2,500
                 SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS..........................................           9,725           9,725
 
                  TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND........................       7,726,720       7,726,720
 
             AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
             AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
       010   POWER..............................................................         279,000         279,000
                 SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND.......................         279,000         279,000
 
                  TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND.........................         279,000         279,000
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS................................         845,169         845,169
       030   AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES.....................             600             600
       040   AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT..................................          17,489          17,489
       050   AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT................................................          78,491          78,491
       060   AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE.........................................         162,420         202,420
                 Restore critical depot maintenance.............................                        [40,000]
       070   AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................           2,700           2,700
       080   AVIATION LOGISTICS.................................................          50,130          50,130
       090   MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS..................................         949,539         960,939
                 Spares.........................................................                        [11,400]
       100   SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING.................................          20,226          20,226
       110   SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............................................       1,679,660       1,843,660
                 Program increase...............................................                       [164,000]
       120   SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT......................................                         126,000
                 Program increase...............................................                       [126,000]
       130   COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS..............................................          37,760          37,760
       160   WARFARE TACTICS....................................................          25,351          25,351
       170   OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY...........................          20,045          20,045
       180   COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES..............................................       1,212,296       1,665,296
                 Combat forces equipment........................................                       [148,000]
                 Combat forces shortfall........................................                       [305,000]
       190   EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE..............................................          10,203          10,203
       250   IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT.................................         127,972         127,972
       260   WEAPONS MAINTENANCE................................................         221,427         221,427
       290   SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION.........................          13,386          13,386
       300   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................         110,940         110,940

[[Page 9025]]

 
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       5,585,804       6,380,204
 
             MOBILIZATION
       340   EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS..............................          18,460          18,460
       360   COAST GUARD SUPPORT................................................         227,033         227,033
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..........................................         245,493         245,493
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       400   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.........................................          50,269          50,269
       430   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................           5,400           5,400
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................          55,669          55,669
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       480   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................           2,418           2,418
       490   EXTERNAL RELATIONS.................................................             516             516
       510   MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.........................           5,107           5,107
       520   OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT............................................           1,411           1,411
       530   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................           2,545           2,545
       550   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................         153,427         153,427
       580   ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.................................           8,570           8,570
       620   NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE........................................           1,425           1,425
       705   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................           5,608           5,608
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................         181,027         181,027
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       710   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                         155,400
                 Increase to support higher fuel rates..........................                       [155,400]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                         155,400
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY...........................       6,067,993       7,017,793
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   OPERATIONAL FORCES.................................................         992,190         992,190
       020   FIELD LOGISTICS....................................................         559,574         559,574
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................         570,000         626,000
                 Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance........................                        [56,000]
       060   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................          69,726          69,726
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       2,191,490       2,247,490
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       110   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................         108,270         108,270
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................         108,270         108,270
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       150   SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION.........................................         365,555         365,555
       160   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................           3,675           3,675
       185   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................             825             825
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................         370,055         370,055
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       190   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                           5,400
                 Increase to support higher fuel rates..........................                         [5,400]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                           5,400
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS...................       2,669,815       2,731,215
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS................................          17,196          17,196
       020   INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE...........................................             200             200
       040   AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE.........................................           6,000           6,000
       070   MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS..................................          12,304          12,304
       090   SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE.............................................           6,790           6,790
       110   COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES..............................................          13,210          13,210
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................          55,700          55,700
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES.......................          55,700          55,700
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
             OPERATING FORCES
       010   OPERATING FORCES...................................................          11,124          11,124
       040   BASE OPERATING SUPPORT.............................................           1,410           1,410
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................          12,534          12,534
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE.....................          12,534          12,534
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
             OPERATING FORCES

[[Page 9026]]

 
       010   PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES..............................................       1,712,393       1,782,393
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance.............................                        [70,000]
       020   COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES..........................................         836,104         836,104
       030   AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS).....................          14,118          14,118
       040   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................       1,373,480       1,473,480
                 Program increase...............................................                       [100,000]
       050   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................         122,712         122,712
       060   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................       1,520,333       1,520,333
       070   GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING.......................................          31,582          31,582
       080   OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS......................................         147,524         147,524
       110   LAUNCH FACILITIES..................................................             857             857
       120   SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS..............................................           8,353           8,353
       130   COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT........................          50,495          50,495
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       5,817,951       5,987,951
 
             MOBILIZATION
       150   AIRLIFT OPERATIONS.................................................       3,091,133       3,141,133
                 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance.............................                        [50,000]
       160   MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS..........................................          47,897          47,897
       170   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................         387,179         887,179
                 Program increase...............................................                       [500,000]
       180   FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION................           7,043           7,043
       190   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................          68,382          68,382
                 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION..........................................       3,601,634       4,151,634
 
             TRAINING AND RECRUITING
       200   OFFICER ACQUISITION................................................             100             100
       210   RECRUIT TRAINING...................................................             478             478
       240   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................          19,256          19,256
       250   SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING.........................................          12,845          12,845
       260   FLIGHT TRAINING....................................................             731             731
       270   PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION.................................             607             607
       280   TRAINING SUPPORT...................................................             720             720
       320   OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION...................................             152             152
                 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING...............................          34,889          34,889
 
             ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
       350   LOGISTICS OPERATIONS...............................................          86,273          86,273
       360   TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.......................................           2,511           2,511
       390   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................          19,887          19,887
       400   ADMINISTRATION.....................................................           3,493           3,493
       410   SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS.........................................         152,086         152,086
       420   OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.......................................         269,825         269,825
       460   INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT..............................................             117             117
       465   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................          16,558          16,558
                 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES..............................         550,750         550,750
 
             UNDISTRIBUTED
       470   UNDISTRIBUTED......................................................                         284,000
                 Increase to support higher fuel rates..........................                       [284,000]
                 SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED.........................................                         284,000
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE......................      10,005,224      11,009,224
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
             OPERATING FORCES
       030   DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................................          26,599          26,599
       050   BASE SUPPORT.......................................................           6,250           6,250
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................          32,849          32,849
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE.....................          32,849          32,849
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
             OPERATING FORCES
       020   MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS.........................................          22,200          22,200
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................          22,200          22,200
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG............................          22,200          22,200
 
             OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
             OPERATING FORCES
       020   SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.........................................       2,222,868       2,222,868
                 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES......................................       2,222,868       2,222,868
 
             ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
       080   DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY......................................          27,781          27,781
       090   DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY.................................          45,746          45,746
       120   DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY.................................          76,348          76,348
       140   DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY......................................          99,538          99,538

[[Page 9027]]

 
       160   DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY.............................................           9,620           9,620
       180   DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY................................       1,950,000       1,950,000
       240   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY...........................         100,100         100,100
       280   OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.................................          38,227          73,227
                 Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories.........                        [35,000]
       290   WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES...................................           2,784           2,784
       295   CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................................................       1,862,066       1,862,066
                 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.............       4,212,210       4,247,210
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE...................       6,435,078       6,470,078
 
                  TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE.................................      62,829,052      67,071,152
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

     SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            FY 2014           House
                 Item                       Request         Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations.....     130,399,881      130,219,281
     Flight Paramedic Training Pay and                           [4,500]
     Allowances--Army Guard...........
     Flight Paramedic Training Pay and                             [900]
     Allowances--Army Reserve.........
     Military Personnel unobligated                           [-186,000]
     balances.........................
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund        6,676,750        6,676,750
 Contributions........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 
                   OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In
                          Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2014          House
                  Item                        Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations.......      9,689,307       9,689,307
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund           164,033         164,033
 Contributions..........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

     SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2014          House
                  Item                        Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS........         25,158          25,158
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY.....         25,158          25,158
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL).         61,731          61,731
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE         61,731          61,731
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)..........         46,428          46,428
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-          46,428          46,428
   WIDE.................................
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA..............      1,412,510       1,412,510
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA.....      1,412,510       1,412,510
 
NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
MPF MLP.................................        134,917         134,917
POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING............         43,404          43,404
LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE............        116,784         116,784
DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS............         60,703          60,703
TAH MAINTENANCE.........................         19,809          19,809
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................         56,058          56,058
READY RESERVE FORCE.....................        299,025         299,025
   TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND..        730,700         730,700
 
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
IN-HOUSE CARE...........................      8,880,738       8,880,738

[[Page 9028]]

 
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE.....................     15,842,732      15,842,732
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT.............      2,505,640       2,505,640
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT..................      1,450,619       1,450,619
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES...................        368,248         368,248
EDUCATION AND TRAINING..................        733,097         733,097
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS..........      1,872,660       1,872,660
R&D RESEARCH............................          9,162           9,162
R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT..............         47,977          47,977
R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT................        291,156         291,156
R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION............        132,430         132,430
R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT.............        161,674         161,674
R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT..............         72,568          72,568
R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT............         14,646          14,646
PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING.................         89,404          89,404
PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION........        377,577         377,577
PROC IEHR...............................        204,200         204,200
UNDISTRIBUTED...........................                       -276,800
     DHP Unobligated....................                      [-440,800]
     Section 711. Future Availability of                       [164,000]
     TRICARE Prime for Certain
     Beneficiaries Enrolled in TRICARE
     Prime..............................
   TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.........     33,054,528      32,777,728
 
CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE.................        451,572         451,572
RDT&E...................................        604,183         604,183
PROCUREMENT.............................          1,368           1,368
   TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS              1,057,123       1,057,123
   DESTRUCTION..........................
 
DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
 DEF
OPERATING FORCES........................        815,965         815,965
DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM...........        122,580         122,580
   TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG           938,545         938,545
   ACTIVITIES, DEF......................
 
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE...............        311,131         311,131
PROCUREMENT.............................          1,000           1,000
   TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL        312,131         312,131
 
   TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS...........     37,638,854      37,362,054
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 
                   OPERATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (In
                          Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2014          House
                  Item                        Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY..............
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS........         44,732          44,732
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY.....         44,732          44,732
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
C-17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR..................         78,500          78,500
TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES............         10,000          10,000
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE         88,500          88,500
 
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)..........        131,678         131,678
   TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-         131,678         131,678
   WIDE.................................
 
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
IN-HOUSE CARE...........................        375,958         375,958
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE.....................        382,560         382,560
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT.............        132,749         132,749
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT..................          2,238           2,238
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES...................            460             460
EDUCATION AND TRAINING..................         10,236          10,236
   TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.........        904,201         904,201
 
DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
 DEF
OPERATING FORCES........................        376,305         376,305
   TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG           376,305         376,305
   ACTIVITIES, DEF......................
 
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE...............         10,766          10,766
   TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL         10,766          10,766

[[Page 9029]]

 
 
   TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS...........      1,556,182       1,556,182
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

     SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                State/Country and                                     Budget          House
          Account                 Installation               Project Title            Request       Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Alaska
Army                          Fort Wainwright         Aviation Battalion Complex.        45,000           45,000
Army                          Fort Wainwright         Aviation Storage Hangar....        58,000           58,000
                            Colorado
Army                          Fort Carson             Aircraft Maintenance Hangar        66,000           66,000
Army                          Fort Carson             Aircraft Maintenance Hangar        73,000           73,000
Army                          Fort Carson             Central Energy Plant.......        34,000           34,000
Army                          Fort Carson             Fire Station...............        12,000           12,000
Army                          Fort Carson             Headquarters Building......        33,000           33,000
Army                          Fort Carson             Runway.....................        12,000           12,000
Army                          Fort Carson             Simulator Building.........        12,200           12,200
                            Florida
Army                          Eglin AFB               Automated Sniper Field Fire         4,700            4,700
                                                       Range.
                            Georgia
Army                          Fort Gordon             Adv Individual Training            61,000           61,000
                                                       Barracks Cplx, Ph2.
                            Hawaii
Army                          Fort Shafter            Command and Control                75,000           65,000
                                                       Facility--Admin.
                            Kansas
Army                          Fort Leavenworth        Simulations Center.........        17,000           17,000
                            Kentucky
Army                          Fort Campbell           Battlefield Weather Support         4,800            4,800
                                                       Facility.
                            Maryland
Army                          Aberdeen Proving        Operations and Maintenance         21,000           21,000
                               Ground                  Facilities.
Army                          Fort Detrick            Entry Control Point........         2,500            2,500
Army                          Fort Detrick            Hazardous Material Storage          4,600            4,600
                                                       Building.
                            Missouri
Army                          Fort Leonard Wood       Adv Individual Training            86,000           86,000
                                                       Barracks Cplx, Ph1.
Army                          Fort Leonard Wood       Simulator Building.........         4,700            4,700
                            New York
Army                          U.S. Military Academy   Cadet Barracks, Incr 2.....        42,000           42,000
                            North Carolina
Army                          Fort Bragg              Command and Control                 5,900            5,900
                                                       Facility.
                            Texas
Army                          Fort Bliss              Control Tower..............        10,800           10,800
Army                          Fort Bliss              Unmanned Aerial Vehicle            36,000           36,000
                                                       Complex.
                            Virginia
Army                          Joint Base Langley-     Adv Individual Training            50,000           50,000
                               Eustis                  Barracks Cplx, Ph3.
                            Washington
Army                          Joint Base Lewis-       Aircraft Maintenance Hangar        79,000           79,000
                               Mcchord
Army                          Joint Base Lewis-       Airfield Operations Complex        37,000           37,000
                               Mcchord
Army                          Joint Base Lewis-       Aviation Battalion Complex.        28,000           28,000
                               Mcchord
Army                          Yakima                  Automated Multipurpose              9,100            9,100
                                                       Machine Gun Range.
                            Worldwide Classified
Army                          Classified Location     Company Operations Complex.        33,000           33,000
                            Kwajalein
Army                          Kwajalein Atoll         Pier.......................        63,000           63,000
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Army                          Unspecified Worldwide   Host Nation Support Fy14...        33,000           23,000
                               Locations
Army                          Unspecified Worldwide   Minor Construction Fy14....        25,000           25,000
                               Locations
Army                          Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design Fy14...        41,575           41,575
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Army                                              1,119,875        1,099,875
                              ......................
                            California
Navy                          Barstow                 Engine Dynamometer Facility        14,998           14,998
Navy                          Camp Pendleton          Ammunition Supply Point            13,124           13,124
                                                       Upgrade.
Navy                          Coronado                H-60 Trainer Facility......         8,910            8,910
Navy                          Point Mugu              Aircraft Engine Test Pads..         7,198            7,198
Navy                          Point Mugu              Bams Consolidated                  17,469           17,469
                                                       Maintenance Hangar.
Navy                          Port Hueneme            Unaccompanied Housing              33,600           33,600
                                                       Conversion.
Navy                          San Diego               Steam Plant                        34,331           34,331
                                                       Decentralization.
Navy                          Twentynine Palms        Camp Wilson Infrastructure         33,437           33,437
                                                       Upgrades.
                            Florida

[[Page 9030]]

 
Navy                          Jacksonville            P-8a Training & Parking            20,752           20,752
                                                       Apron Expansion.
Navy                          Key West                Aircraft Crash/Rescue &            14,001           14,001
                                                       Fire Headquarters.
Navy                          Mayport                 Lcs Logistics Support              16,093           16,093
                                                       Facility.
                            Georgia
Navy                          Albany                  Cers Dispatch Facility.....         1,010            1,010
Navy                          Albany                  Weapons Storage and                15,600           15,600
                                                       Inspection Facility.
Navy                          Savannah                Townsend Bombing Range Land        61,717           61,717
                                                       Acq--Phase 1.
                            Guam
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Aircraft Maintenance               85,673           85,673
                                                       Hangar--North Ramp.
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Bams Forward Operational &         61,702           61,702
                                                       Maintenance Hangar.
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Dehumidified Supply Storage        17,170           17,170
                                                       Facility.
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Emergent Repair Facility           35,860           35,860
                                                       Expansion.
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Modular Storage Magazines..        63,382           63,382
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   Sierra Wharf Improvements..         1,170            1,170
Navy                          Joint Region Marianas   X-Ray Wharf Improvements...        53,420           53,420
                            Hawaii
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/          25,336           25,336
                                                       Operations Complex.
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Aircraft Maintenance               16,968           16,968
                                                       Expansion.
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Aircraft Maintenance Hangar        31,820           31,820
                                                       Upgrades.
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Armory Addition and                12,952           12,952
                                                       Renovation.
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Aviation Simulator                 17,724           17,724
                                                       Modernization/Addition.
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Mv-22 Hangar...............        57,517           57,517
Navy                          Kaneohe Bay             Mv-22 Parking Apron and            74,665           74,665
                                                       Infrastructure.
Navy                          Pearl City              Water Transmission Line....        30,100           30,100
Navy                          Pearl Harbor            Drydock Waterfront Facility        22,721           22,721
Navy                          Pearl Harbor            Submarine Production               35,277           35,277
                                                       Support Facility.
                            Illinois
Navy                          Great Lakes             Unaccompanied Housing......        35,851           35,851
                            Maine
Navy                          Bangor                  Nctams Vlf Commercial Power        13,800           13,800
                                                       Connection.
Navy                          Kittery                 Structural Shops                   11,522           11,522
                                                       Consolidation.
                            Maryland
Navy                          Fort Meade              Marforcybercom HQ-Ops              83,988           83,988
                                                       Building.
                            Nevada
Navy                          Fallon                  Wastewater Treatment Plant.        11,334           11,334
                            North Carolina
Navy                          Camp Lejeune            Landfill--Phase 4..........        20,795           20,795
Navy                          Camp Lejeune            Operations Training Complex        22,515           22,515
Navy                          Camp Lejeune            Steam Decentralization--BEQ        18,679           18,679
                                                       Nodes.
Navy                          Camp Lejeune            Steam Decentralization--            2,620            2,620
                                                       Camp Johnson.
Navy                          Camp Lejeune            Steam Decentralization--           13,390           13,390
                                                       Hadnot Point.
Navy                          New River               Ch-53k Maintenance Training        13,218           13,218
                                                       Facility.
Navy                          New River               Corrosion Control Hangar...        12,547           12,547
Navy                          New River               Regional Communication             20,098           20,098
                                                       Station.
                            Oklahoma
Navy                          Tinker AFB              Tacamo E-6B Hangar.........        14,144           14,144
                            Rhode Island
Navy                          Newport                 Hewitt Hall Research Center        12,422           12,422
                            South Carolina
Navy                          Charleston              Nuclear Power Operational          73,932           73,932
                                                       Training Facility.
                            Virginia
Navy                          Dam Neck                Aerial Target Operation            10,587           10,587
                                                       Consolidation.
Navy                          Norfolk                 Pier 11 Power Upgrades for          3,380            3,380
                                                       Cvn-78.
Navy                          Quantico                Academic Instruction               25,731           25,731
                                                       Facility Tecom Schools.
Navy                          Quantico                Atc Transmitter/Receiver            3,630            3,630
                                                       Relocation.
Navy                          Quantico                Fuller Road Improvements...         9,013            9,013
Navy                          Yorktown                Small Arms Ranges..........        18,700           18,700
                            Washington
Navy                          Bremerton               Integrated Water Treatment         18,189           18,189
                                                       Sys Dry Docks 3&4.
Navy                          Kitsap                  Explosives Handling Wharf          24,880           24,880
                                                       #2 (Inc).
Navy                          Whidbey Island          Ea-18g Facility                    32,482           32,482
                                                       Improvements.
Navy                          Whidbey Island          P-8a Hangar and Training           85,167           85,167
                                                       Facilities.
                            Djibouti
Navy                          Camp Lemonier           Armory.....................         6,420            6,420
Navy                          Camp Lemonier           Unaccompanied Housing......        22,580           22,580
                            Japan
Navy                          Camp Butler             Airfield Security Upgrades.         5,820            5,820
Navy                          Yokosuka                Communication System                7,568            7,568
                                                       Upgrade.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Navy                          Unspecified Worldwide   Mcon Design Funds..........        89,830           89,830
                               Locations
Navy                          Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                  19,740           19,740
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Navy                                              1,700,269        1,700,269
                              ......................
                            Arizona
AF                            Luke AFB                F-35 Field Training                 5,500            5,500
                                                       Detachment.
AF                            Luke AFB                F-35 Sq Ops/Aircraft               21,400           21,400
                                                       Maintenance Unit #3.

[[Page 9031]]

 
                            California
AF                            Beale AFB               Distributed Common Ground          62,000           62,000
                                                       Station Ops Bldg.
                            Florida
AF                            Tyndall AFB             F-22 Munitions Storage              9,100            9,100
                                                       Complex.
                            Guam
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Par--Fuel Sys Hardened             20,000           20,000
                                                       Bldgs.
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Par--Strike Tactical               10,530           10,530
                                                       Missile Mxs Facility.
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Par--Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/         132,600          132,600
                                                       AMU/Sqd Ops.
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Prtc Red Horse Airfield             8,500            8,500
                                                       Operations Facility.
AF                            Joint Region Marianas   Prtc Sf Fire Rescue &               4,600            4,600
                                                       Emergency Mgt.
                            Kansas
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a 2-Bay Corrosion                  0           82,000
                                                       Control/Fuel Cell Hangar.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a 3-Bay General                    0           80,000
                                                       Purpose Maintenance Hangar.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Aircraft Parking                 0            2,200
                                                       Apron Alteration.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Aprons Fuels                     0           12,800
                                                       Distribution System.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Flight Simulator                 0            2,150
                                                       Facility Phase 1.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a General Maintenance              0           32,000
                                                       Hangar.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Miscellaneous                    0              970
                                                       Facilities Alteration.
AF                            Mcconnell AFB           KC-46a Pipeline Student                 0            7,000
                                                       Dormatory.
                            Hawaii
AF                            Joint Base Pearl        C-17 Modernize Hgr 35,              4,800            4,800
                               Harbor-Hickam           Docks 1&2.
                            Kentucky
AF                            Fort Campbell           19th Air Support Operations         8,000            8,000
                                                       Sqdrn Expansion.
                            Maryland
AF                            Fort Meade              Cybercom Joint Operations          85,000           85,000
                                                       Center, Increment 1.
AF                            Joint Base Andrews      Helicopter Operations              30,000           30,000
                                                       Facility.
                            Missouri
AF                            Whiteman AFB            Wsa Mop Igloos and Assembly         5,900            5,900
                                                       Facility.
                            Nebraska
AF                            Offutt AFB              Usstratcom Replacement            136,000          136,000
                                                       Facility, Incr 3.
                            Nevada
AF                            Nellis AFB              Add Rpa Weapons School             20,000           20,000
                                                       Facility.
AF                            Nellis AFB              Dormitory (240 Rm).........        35,000           35,000
AF                            Nellis AFB              F-35 Alt Mission Equip              5,000            5,000
                                                       (Ame) Storage.
AF                            Nellis AFB              F-35 Fuel Cell Hangar......         9,400            9,400
AF                            Nellis AFB              F-35 Parts Store...........         9,100            9,100
                            New Mexico
AF                            Cannon AFB              Airmen and Family Readiness         5,500            5,500
                                                       Center.
AF                            Cannon AFB              Dormitory (144 Rm).........        22,000           22,000
AF                            Cannon AFB              Satellite Dining Facility..         6,600            6,600
AF                            Holloman AFB            F-16 Aircraft Covered               2,250            2,250
                                                       Washrack and Pad.
AF                            Kirtland AFB            Nuclear Systems Wing &             30,500           30,500
                                                       Sustainment Center (Ph.
                            North Dakota
AF                            Minot AFB               B-52 Adal Aircraft                 15,530           15,530
                                                       Maintenance Unit.
AF                            Minot AFB               B-52 Munitions Storage              8,300            8,300
                                                       Igloos.
                            Oklahoma
AF                            Altus AFB               KC-46a Ftu Adal Fuel                    0            3,350
                                                       Systems Maintenance Dock.
AF                            Altus AFB               KC-46a Ftu Adal Squad Ops/              0            7,400
                                                       AMU.
AF                            Altus AFB               KC-46a Ftu Flight Training              0           12,600
                                                       Center Simulators Facility
                                                       Phase 1.
AF                            Altus AFB               KC-46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer             0            6,300
                                                       Phase 1.
AF                            Altus AFB               KC-46a Ftu Renovate                     0            1,200
                                                       Facility.
AF                            Tinker AFB              KC-46a Land Acquisition....         8,600            8,600
                            Texas
AF                            Fort Bliss              F-16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft             3,350            3,350
                                                       Arresting System.
                            Utah
AF                            Hill AFB                F-35 Aircraft Mx Unit              13,500           13,500
                                                       Hangar 45e Ops #1.
AF                            Hill AFB                Fire Crash Rescue Station..        18,500           18,500
                            Virginia
AF                            Joint Base Langley-     4-Bay Conventional                  4,800            4,800
                               Eustis                  Munitions Inspection Bldg.
                            Greenland
AF                            Thule Ab                Thule Consolidation, Phase         43,904           43,904
                                                       2.
                            Mariana Islands
AF                            Saipan                  Par--Airport Pol/Bulk              18,500           18,500
                                                       Storage Ast.
AF                            Saipan                  Par--Hazardous Cargo Pad...         8,000            8,000
AF                            Saipan                  Par--Maintenance Facility..         2,800            2,800
                            United Kingdom
AF                            Croughton Raf           Main Gate Complex..........        12,000                0
AF                            Royal Air Force         Guardian Angel Operations          22,047           22,047
                               Lakenheath              Facility.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
AF                            Unspecified Worldwide   KC-46a Ftu Facility                63,000                0
                               Locations               Projects.
AF                            Unspecified Worldwide   KC-46a Mob #1 Facility            192,700                0
                               Locations               Projects.
AF                            Unspecified Worldwide   Planning & Design..........        11,314           11,314
                               Locations
AF                            Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                  20,448           20,448
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Air Force                                         1,156,573        1,138,843

[[Page 9032]]

 
                              ......................
                            Alaska
Def-Wide                      Clear AFS               Bmds Upgrade Early Warning         17,204           17,204
                                                       Radar.
Def-Wide                      Fort Greely             Mechanical-Electrical Bldg         82,000           82,000
                                                       Missile Field #1.
                            California
Def-Wide                      Brawley                 SOF Desert Warfare Training        23,095           23,095
                                                       Center.
Def-Wide                      Defense Distribution    General Purpose Warehouse..        37,554           37,554
                               Depot-Tracy
Def-Wide                      Miramar                 Replace Fuel Pipeline......         6,000            6,000
                            Colorado
Def-Wide                      Fort Carson             SOF Group Support Battalion        22,282           22,282
                            Florida
Def-Wide                      Hurlburt Field          SOF Add/Alter Operations            7,900            7,900
                                                       Facility.
Def-Wide                      Jacksonville            Replace Fuel Pipeline......         7,500            7,500
Def-Wide                      Key West                SOF Boat Docks.............         3,600                0
Def-Wide                      Panama City             Replace Ground Vehicle              2,600            2,600
                                                       Fueling Facility.
Def-Wide                      Tyndall AFB             Replace Fuel Pipeline......         9,500            9,500
                            Georgia
Def-Wide                      Fort Benning            Faith Middle School                 6,031            6,031
                                                       Addition.
Def-Wide                      Fort Benning            White Elemtary School              37,304           37,304
                                                       Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Fort Stewart            Diamond Elementary School          44,504           44,504
                                                       Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Hunter Army Airfield    Replace Fuel Island........        13,500           13,500
Def-Wide                      Moody AFB               Replace Ground Vehicle              3,800            3,800
                                                       Fueling Facility.
                            Hawaii
Def-Wide                      Ford Island             DISA Pacific Facility               2,615            2,615
                                                       Upgrades.
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Pearl        Alter Warehouse Space......         2,800            2,800
                               Harbor-Hickam
                            Kentucky
Def-Wide                      Fort Campbell           Fort Campbell High School          59,278           59,278
                                                       Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Fort Campbell           Marshall Elementary School         38,591           38,591
                                                       Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Fort Campbell           SOF Group Special Troops           26,342           26,342
                                                       Battalion.
Def-Wide                      Fort Knox               Ambulatory Health Center...       265,000          265,000
Def-Wide                      Fort Knox               Consolidate/Replace Van            38,023           38,023
                                                       Voorhis-Mudge Es.
                            Maryland
Def-Wide                      Aberdeen Proving        Public Health Command Lab         210,000          110,000
                               Ground                  Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Bethesda Naval          Mech & Electrical                  46,800           46,800
                               Hospital                Improvements.
Def-Wide                      Bethesda Naval          Parking Garage.............        20,000           20,000
                               Hospital
Def-Wide                      Fort Detrick            USAMRIID Replacement Stage         13,000                0
                                                       1, Incr 8.
Def-Wide                      Fort Meade              High Performance Computing        431,000          431,000
                                                       Capacity Inc 3.
Def-Wide                      Fort Meade              NSAW Recapitalize Building         58,000           58,000
                                                       #1/Site M Inc 2.
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Andrews      Ambulatory Care Center Inc         76,200           63,800
                                                       2.
                            Massachusetts
Def-Wide                      Hanscom AFB             Hanscom Primary School             36,213           36,213
                                                       Replacement.
                            New Jersey
Def-Wide                      Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Replace Fuel Distribution          10,000           10,000
                               Lakehurst               Components.
                            New Mexico
Def-Wide                      Holloman AFB            Medical Clinic Replacement.        60,000           60,000
Def-Wide                      Holloman AFB            Replace Hydrant Fuel System        21,400           21,400
                            North Carolina
Def-Wide                      Camp Lejeune            SOF Performance Resiliency         14,400                0
                                                       Center.
Def-Wide                      Camp Lejeune            SOF Sustainment Training           28,977           28,977
                                                       Complex.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              Consolidate/Replace Pope           37,032           37,032
                                                       Holbrook Elementary.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Civil Affairs Battalion        37,689           37,689
                                                       Annex.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Combat Medic Skills             7,600            7,600
                                                       Sustain. Course Bldg.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Engineer Training              10,419           10,419
                                                       Facility.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Language and Cultural          64,606           64,606
                                                       Center.
Def-Wide                      Fort Bragg              SOF Upgrade Training               14,719           14,719
                                                       Facility.
                            North Dakota
Def-Wide                      Minot AFB               Replace Fuel Pipeline......         6,400            6,400
                            Oklahoma
Def-Wide                      Altus AFB               Replace Refueler Parking...         2,100            2,100
Def-Wide                      Tinker AFB              Replace Fuel Distribution          36,000           36,000
                                                       Facilities.
                            Pennsylvania
Def-Wide                      Def Distribution Depot  Upgrade Hazardous Material          3,100            3,100
                               New Cumberland          Warehouse.
Def-Wide                      Def Distribution Depot  Upgrade Public Safety               5,900            5,900
                               New Cumberland          Facility.
                            South Carolina
Def-Wide                      Beaufort                Bolden Elementary/Middle           41,324           41,324
                                                       School Replacement.
                            Tennessee
Def-Wide                      Arnold Air Force Base   Replace Ground Vehicle              2,200            2,200
                                                       Fueling Facility.
                            Texas
Def-Wide                      Fort Bliss              Hospital Replacement Incr 5       252,100          152,100
Def-Wide                      Joint Base San Antonio  Sammc Hyperbaric Facility          12,600           12,600
                                                       Addition.
                            Virginia
Def-Wide                      Dam Neck                SOF Human Performance              11,147                0
                                                       Center.
Def-Wide                      Def Distribution Depot  Operations Center Phase 1..        87,000           87,000
                               Richmond
Def-Wide                      Joint Expeditionary     SOF Logsu Two Operations           30,404           30,404
                               Base Little Creek--     Facility.
                               Story

[[Page 9033]]

 
Def-Wide                      Pentagon                Boundary Channel Access             6,700            6,700
                                                       Control Point.
Def-Wide                      Pentagon                Pentagon South Pedestrian           1,850            1,850
                                                       Safety Project.
Def-Wide                      Pentagon                Pfpa Support Operations            14,800           14,800
                                                       Center.
Def-Wide                      Pentagon                Raven Rock Administrative          32,000           32,000
                                                       Facility Upgrade.
Def-Wide                      Pentagon                Raven Rock Exterior Cooling         4,100            4,100
                                                       Tower.
Def-Wide                      Quantico                Quantico Middle/High School        40,586           40,586
                                                       Replacement.
                            Washington
Def-Wide                      Whidbey Island          Replace Fuel Pier                  10,000           10,000
                                                       Breakwater.
                            Worldwide Classified
Def-Wide                      Classified Location     an/Tpy-2 Radar Site........        15,000           15,000
                            Bahrain Island
Def-Wide                      Sw Asia                 Medical/Dental Clinic              45,400           45,400
                                                       Replacement.
                            Belgium
Def-Wide                      Brussels                NATO Headquarters Facility.        38,513           38,513
Def-Wide                      Brussels                NATO Headquarters Fit-Out..        29,100           29,100
                            Germany
Def-Wide                      Kaiserlautern Ab        Kaiserslautern Elementary          49,907           49,907
                                                       School Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Ramstein Ab             Ramstein High School               98,762           98,762
                                                       Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Rhine Ordnance          Medical Center Replacement,       151,545          151,545
                               Barracks                Incr 3.
Def-Wide                      Weisbaden               Hainerberg Elementary              58,899           58,899
                                                       School Replacement.
Def-Wide                      Weisbaden               Wiesbaden Middle School            50,756           50,756
                                                       Replacement.
                            Japan
Def-Wide                      Atsugi                  Replace Ground Vehicle              4,100            4,100
                                                       Fueling Facility.
Def-Wide                      Iwakuni                 Construct Hydrant Fuel             34,000           34,000
                                                       System.
Def-Wide                      Kadena Ab               Kadena Middle School               38,792           38,792
                                                       Addition/Renovation.
Def-Wide                      Torri Commo Station     SOF Facility Augmentation..        71,451           64,071
Def-Wide                      Yokosuka                Upgrade Fuel Pumps.........        10,600           10,600
                            Korea
Def-Wide                      Camp Walker             Daegu Middle/High School           52,164           52,164
                                                       Replacement.
                            Romania
Def-Wide                      Deveselu                Aegis Ashore Missile Def           85,000           80,000
                                                       Sys Cmplx, Increm. 2.
                            United Kingdom
Def-Wide                      Raf Mildenhall          Replace Fuel Storage.......        17,732           17,732
Def-Wide                      Raf Mildenhall          SOF Airfield Pavements and              0           48,448
                                                       Hangar/AMU.
Def-Wide                      Raf Mildenhall          SOF Airfiled Pavements.....        24,077                0
Def-Wide                      Raf Mildenhall          SOF Hangar/AMU.............        24,371                0
Def-Wide                      Raf Mildenhall          SOF Mrsp and Parts Storage.         6,797            6,797
Def-Wide                      Raf Mildenhall          SOF Squadron Operations            11,652           11,652
                                                       Facility.
Def-Wide                      Royal Air Force         Lakenheath High School             69,638           69,638
                               Lakenheath              Replacement.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Contingency Construction...        10,000                0
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Energy Conservation               150,000          150,000
                               Locations               Investment Program.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Exercise Related Minor              9,730            9,730
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning & Design..........        10,891           10,891
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........        75,905           75,905
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........        36,866           36,866
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........         6,931            6,931
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........        50,192           50,192
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........        57,053           57,053
                               Locations
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   2,000            2,000
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   7,430            7,430
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   5,170            5,170
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   5,409            5,409
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   1,500            1,500
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   9,578            9,578
                               Locations               Construction.
Def-Wide                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   3,000            3,000
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide                                      3,985,300        3,708,373
                              ......................
                            Kentucky
Chem Demil                    Blue Grass Army Depot   Ammunition Demilitarization       122,536          122,536
                                                       Facility, Ph Xiv.
                            ........................
       Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense                            122,536          122,536

[[Page 9034]]

 
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
NATO                          NATO Security           NATO Security Investment          239,700          199,700
                               Investment Program      Program.
                            ........................
       Total NATO Security Investment Program                                           239,700          199,700
                              ......................
                            Alabama
Army NG                       Decatur                 National Guard Readiness            4,000            4,000
                                                       Center Add/Alt.
                            Arkansas
Army NG                       Fort Chaffee            Scout/Recce Gunnery Complex        21,000           21,000
                            Florida
Army NG                       Pinellas Park           Ready Building.............         5,700            5,700
                            Illinois
Army NG                       Kankakee                Aircraft Maintenance Hangar        28,000           28,000
Army NG                       Kankakee                Readiness Center...........        14,000           14,000
                            Massachusetts
Army NG                       Camp Edwards            Enlisted Barracks,                 19,000           19,000
                                                       Transient Training Add.
                            Michigan
Army NG                       Camp Grayling           Enlisted Barracks,                 17,000           17,000
                                                       Transient Training.
                            Minnesota
Army NG                       Stillwater              Readiness Center...........        17,000           17,000
                            Mississippi
Army NG                       Camp Shelby             Water Supply/Treatment              3,000            3,000
                                                       Building, Potable.
Army NG                       Pascagoula              Readiness Center...........         4,500            4,500
                            Missouri
Army NG                       Macon                   Vehicle Maintenance Shop...         9,100            9,100
Army NG                       Whiteman AFB            Aircraft Maintenance Hangar         5,000            5,000
                            New York
Army NG                       New York                Readiness Center Add/Alt...        31,000           31,000
                            Ohio
Army NG                       Ravenna Army            Sanitary Sewer.............         5,200            5,200
                               Ammunition Plant
                            Pennsylvania
Army NG                       Fort Indiantown Gap     Aircraft Maintenance               40,000           40,000
                                                       Instructional Building.
                            Puerto Rico
Army NG                       Camp Santiago           Maneuver Area Training &            5,600            5,600
                                                       Equipment Site Addit.
                            South Carolina
Army NG                       Greenville              Readiness Center...........        13,000           13,000
Army NG                       Greenville              Vehicle Maintenance Shop...        13,000           13,000
                            Texas
Army NG                       Fort Worth              Armed Forces Reserve Center        14,270           14,270
                                                       Add.
                            Wyoming
Army NG                       Afton                   National Guard Readiness           10,200           10,200
                                                       Center.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Army NG                       Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........        29,005           24,005
                               Locations
Army NG                       Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                  12,240           12,240
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Army National Guard                                 320,815          315,815
                              ......................
                            California
Army Res                      Camp Parks              Army Reserve Center........        17,500           17,500
Army Res                      Fort Hunter Liggett     Tass Training Center (Ttc).        16,500           16,500
                            Maryland
Army Res                      Bowie                   Army Reserve Center........        25,500           25,500
                            New Jersey
Army Res                      Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Automated Multipurpose              9,500            9,500
                               Lakehurst               Machine Gun (Mpmg).
Army Res                      Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Central Issue Facility.....         7,900            7,900
                               Lakehurst
Army Res                      Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Consolidated Dining                13,400           13,400
                               Lakehurst               Facility.
Army Res                      Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Modified Record Fire Range.         5,400            5,400
                               Lakehurst
                            New York
Army Res                      Bullville               Army Reserve Center........        14,500           14,500
                            North Carolina
Army Res                      Fort Bragg              Army Reserve Center........        24,500           24,500
                            Wisconsin
Army Res                      Fort Mccoy              Access Control Point/Mail/         17,500           17,500
                                                       Freight Center.
Army Res                      Fort Mccoy              Nco Academy Dining Facility         5,900            5,900
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Army Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........        14,212           14,212
                               Locations
Army Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Unspecified Minor                   1,748            1,748
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................

[[Page 9035]]

 
       Total Military Construction, Army Reserve                                        174,060          174,060
                              ......................
                            California
N/MC Res                      March AFB               NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve         11,086           11,086
                                                       Training Center.
                            Missouri
N/MC Res                      Kansas City             Reserve Training Center--          15,020           15,020
                                                       Belton, Missouri.
                            Tennessee
N/MC Res                      Memphis                 Reserve Boat Maintenance            4,330            4,330
                                                       and Storage Facility.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
N/MC Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Mcnr Planning & Design.....         1,500            1,500
                               Locations
N/MC Res                      Unspecified Worldwide   Usmcr Planning and Design..         1,040            1,040
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve                        32,976           32,976
                              ......................
                            Alabama
Air NG                        Birmingham IAP          Add to and Alter                    8,500            8,500
                                                       Distributed Ground Station
                                                       F.
                            Indiana
Air NG                        Hulman Regional         Add/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist          7,300            7,300
                               Airport                 Common Ground Sta.
                            Maryland
Air NG                        Fort Meade              175th Network Warfare               4,000                0
                                                       Squadron Facility.
Air NG                        Martin State Airport    Cyber/ISR Facility.........         8,000                0
                            Montana
Air NG                        Great Falls IAP         Intra-Theater Airlift              22,000           22,000
                                                       Conversion.
                            New York
Air NG                        Fort Drum               Mq-9 Flight Training Unit           4,700            4,700
                                                       Hangar.
                            Ohio
Air NG                        Springfield Beckley-    Alter Intelligence                  7,200            7,200
                               Map                     Operations Facility.
                            Pennsylvania
Air NG                        Fort Indiantown Gap     Communications Operations           7,700            7,700
                                                       and Training Facili.
                            Rhode Island
Air NG                        Quonset State Airport   C-130J Flight Simulator             6,000            6,000
                                                       Training Facility.
                            Tennessee
Air NG                        Mcghee-Tyson Airport    Tec Expansion- Dormitory &         18,000           18,000
                                                       Classroom Facility.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
Air NG                        Various Worldwide       Planning and Design........        13,400           13,400
                               Locations
Air NG                        Various Worldwide       Unspecified Minor                  13,000           13,000
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Air National Guard                                  119,800          107,800
                              ......................
                            California
AF Res                        March AFB               Joint Regional Deployment          19,900           19,900
                                                       Processing Center,.
                            Florida
AF Res                        Homestead AFS           Entry Control Complex......         9,800            9,800
                            Oklahoma
AF Res                        Tinker AFB              Air Control Group Squadron         12,200           12,200
                                                       Operations.
                            Worldwide Unspecified
AF Res                        Various Worldwide       Planning and Design........         2,229            2,229
                               Locations
AF Res                        Various Worldwide       Unspecified Minor                   1,530            1,530
                               Locations               Construction.
                            ........................
       Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve                                    45,659           45,659
                              ......................
                            Wisconsin
FH Con Army                   Fort Mccoy              Family Housing New                 23,000           23,000
                                                       Construction (56 Units).
                            Germany
FH Con Army                   South Camp Vilseck      Family Housing New                 16,600           16,600
                                                       Construction (29 Units).
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Family Housing P & D.......         4,408            4,408
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Construction, Army                                           44,008           44,008
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings................        33,125           33,125
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Leased Housing.............       180,924          180,924
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real               107,639          107,639
                               Locations               Property Facilities.
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account.........        54,433           54,433
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Military Housing                   25,661           25,661
                               Locations               Privitization Initiative.
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Miscellaneous..............           646              646
                               Locations

[[Page 9036]]

 
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Services...................        13,536           13,536
                               Locations
FH Ops Army                   Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities..................        96,907           96,907
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army                               512,871          512,871
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Improvements...............        72,093           72,093
                               Locations
FH Con AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Planning and Design........         4,267            4,267
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force                                      76,360           76,360
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account........        39,470           39,470
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Housing Privatization......        41,436           41,436
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing....................        54,514           54,514
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance (Rpma Rpmc)....       110,786          110,786
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account.........        53,044           53,044
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Miscellaneous Account......         1,954            1,954
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Services Account...........        16,862           16,862
                               Locations
FH Ops AF                     Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account..........        70,532           70,532
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force                          388,598          388,598
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Design.....................         4,438            4,438
                               Locations
FH Con Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Improvements...............        68,969           68,969
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps                          73,407           73,407
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account........        21,073           21,073
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing....................        74,962           74,962
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                90,122           90,122
                               Locations               Property.
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account.........        60,782           60,782
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Miscellaneous Account......           362              362
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Privatization Support Costs        27,634           27,634
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Services Account...........        20,596           20,596
                               Locations
FH Ops Navy                   Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account..........        94,313           94,313
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps              389,844          389,844
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account........            67               67
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account........            20               20
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Furnishings Account........         3,196            3,196
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing....................        10,994           10,994
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Leasing....................        40,433           40,433
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                   311              311
                               Locations               Property.
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Maintenance of Real                    74               74
                               Locations               Property.

[[Page 9037]]

 
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Management Account.........           418              418
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Services Account...........            32               32
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account..........           288              288
                               Locations
FH Ops DW                     Unspecified Worldwide   Utilities Account..........            12               12
                               Locations
                            ........................
       Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide                        55,845           55,845
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
FHIF                          Unspecified Worldwide   Family Housing Improvement          1,780            1,780
                               Locations               Fund.
                            ........................
       Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund                                          1,780            1,780
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC                          Base Realignment &      Base Realignment and              180,401          180,401
                               Closure, Army           Closure.
BRAC                          Base Realignment &      Base Realignment & Closure.       108,300          108,300
                               Closure, Navy
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Dod BRAC Activities--Air          126,376          126,376
                               Locations               Force.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-100: Planing, Design            7,277            7,277
                               Locations               and Management.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-101: Various Locations.        20,988           20,988
                               Locations
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-138: NAS Brunswick, ME.           993              993
                               Locations
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-157: Mcsa Kansas City,             40               40
                               Locations               MO.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-172: NWS Seal Beach,            5,766            5,766
                               Locations               Concord, CA.
BRAC                          Unspecified Worldwide   Don-84: JRB Willow Grove &          1,216            1,216
                               Locations               Cambria Reg Ap.
                            ........................
       Total Base Realignment and Closure--Army                                         451,357          451,357
                              ......................
                            Worldwide Unspecified
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--ANG                 0          -45,623
                               Locations               Unspecified Minor
                                                       Construction.
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--Army                0          -14,000
                               Locations               Bid Savings.
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--Army                0          -50,000
                               Locations               Planning and Design Fy12.
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--Defense             0         -358,400
                               Locations               Wide Bid Savings.
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--Defense             0          -16,470
                               Locations               Wide Unspecified Minor
                                                       Construction.
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--Navy                0          -49,920
                               Locations               Bid Savings.
PYS                           Unspecified Worldwide   Prior Year Savings--Section             0          -50,000
                               Locations               1013 of the Demonstration
                                                       Cities and Metropolitan
                                                       Development Act of 1966,
                                                       As Amended.
                            ........................
       Total Prior Year Savings                                                               0         -584,413
                              ......................
      Total Military Construction                                                    11,011,633       10,055,563
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

     SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS (In Thousands
                               of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              FY 2014          House
                 Program                      Request       Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
  Energy And Water Development, And
   Related Agencies
  Appropriation Summary:
    Energy Programs
      Electricity delivery and energy            16,000               0
       reliability......................
      Nuclear Energy....................         94,000          94,000
 
    Atomic Energy Defense Activities

[[Page 9038]]

 
      National nuclear security
       administration:
        Weapons activities..............      7,868,409       8,088,409
        Defense nuclear nonproliferation      2,140,142       2,140,142
        Naval reactors..................      1,246,134       1,246,134
        Office of the administrator.....        397,784         389,784
  Total, National nuclear security           11,652,469      11,864,469
   administration.......................
 
      Environmental and other defense
       activities:
        Defense environmental cleanup...      5,316,909       4,958,909
        Other defense activities........        749,080         749,080
  Total, Environmental & other defense        6,065,989       5,707,989
   activities...........................
  Total, Atomic Energy Defense               17,718,458      17,572,458
   Activities...........................
  Total, Discretionary Funding..........     17,828,458      17,666,458
 
Electricity Delivery & Energy
 Reliability
  Electricity Delivery & Energy
   Reliability
    Infrastructure security & energy             16,000               0
     restoration (HS)...................
 
Nuclear Energy
  Idaho sitewide safeguards and security         94,000          94,000
 
Weapons Activities
    Life extension programs and major
     alterations
      B61 Life extension program........        537,044         581,044
      W76 Life extension program........        235,382         245,082
      W78/88-1 Life extension program...         72,691          78,291
      W88 ALT 370.......................        169,487         169,487
  Total, Stockpile assessment and design      1,014,604       1,073,904
 
    Stockpile systems
      B61 Stockpile systems.............         83,536          83,536
      W76 Stockpile systems.............         47,187          47,187
      W78 Stockpile systems.............         54,381          54,381
      W80 Stockpile systems.............         50,330          50,330
      B83 Stockpile systems.............         54,948          60,948
      W87 Stockpile systems.............        101,506         101,506
      W88 Stockpile systems.............         62,600          62,600
  Total, Stockpile systems..............        454,488         460,488
 
    Weapons dismantlement and
     disposition
      Operations and maintenance........         49,264          49,264
 
    Stockpile services
      Production support................        321,416         351,016
      Research and development support..         26,349          29,549
      R&D certification and safety......        191,259         209,559
      Management, technology, and               214,187         214,187
       production.......................
      Plutonium sustainment.............        156,949         166,449
  Total, Stockpile services.............        910,160         970,760
  Total, Directed stockpile work........      2,428,516       2,554,416
 
  Campaigns:
    Science campaign
      Advanced certification............         54,730          54,730
      Primary assessment technologies...        109,231         109,231
      Dynamic materials properties......        116,965         116,965
      Advanced radiography..............         30,509          30,509
      Secondary assessment technologies.         86,467          86,467
  Total, Science campaign...............        397,902         397,902
 
    Engineering campaign
      Enhanced surety...................         51,771          54,271
      Weapon systems engineering                 23,727          23,727
       assessment technology............
      Nuclear survivability.............         19,504          19,504
      Enhanced surveillance.............         54,909          58,909
  Total, Engineering campaign...........        149,911         156,411
 
    Inertial confinement fusion ignition
     and high yield campaign
      Ignition..........................         80,245          80,245
      Support of other stockpile                 15,001          15,001
       programs.........................
      Diagnostics, cryogenics and                59,897          59,897
       experimental support.............
      Pulsed power inertial confinement           5,024           5,024
       fusion...........................
      Joint program in high energy                8,198           8,198
       density laboratory plasmas.......
      Facility operations and target            232,678         232,678
       production.......................
  Total, Inertial confinement fusion and        401,043         401,043
   high yield campaign..................
 
    Advanced simulation and computing           564,329         564,329
     campaign...........................
 
    Readiness Campaign

[[Page 9039]]

 
      Component manufacturing                   106,085         106,085
       development......................
      Tritium readiness.................         91,695          91,695
  Total, Readiness campaign.............        197,780         197,780
  Total, Campaigns......................      1,710,965       1,717,465
 
  Nuclear programs
    Nuclear operations capability.......        265,937         265,937
    Capabilities based investments......         39,558          39,558
    Construction:
      12-D-301 TRU waste facilities,             26,722          26,722
       LANL.............................
      11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment                30,679          30,679
       project Phase 2, LANL............
      07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste          55,719          55,719
       treatment facility upgrade
       project, LANL....................
      06-D-141 PED/Construction, Uranium        325,835         325,835
       Capabilities Replacement Project
       Y-12.............................
  Total, Construction...................        438,955         438,955
  Total, Nuclear programs...............        744,450         744,450
 
  Secure transportation asset
    Operations and equipment............        122,072         122,072
    Program direction...................         97,118          97,118
  Total, Secure transportation asset....        219,190         219,190
 
  Site stewardship
    Nuclear materials integration.......         17,679          17,679
    Corporate project management........         13,017          13,017
 
    Minority serving institution                 14,531          14,531
     partnerships program...............
 
    Enterprise infrastructure
      Site Operations...................      1,112,455       1,112,455
      Site Support......................        109,561         109,561
      Sustainment.......................        433,764         498,864
      Facilities disposition............          5,000           5,000
  Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure...      1,660,780       1,725,880
  Total, Site stewardship...............      1,706,007       1,771,107
 
 
  Defense nuclear security
    Operations and maintenance..........        664,981         664,981
    Construction:
      14-D-710 DAF Argus, NNSS..........         14,000          14,000
  Total, Defense nuclear security.......        678,981         678,981
 
  NNSA CIO activities...................        148,441         170,941
 
  Legacy contractor pensions............        279,597         279,597
  Subtotal, Weapons activities..........      7,916,147       8,136,147
 
  Adjustments
    Use of prior year balances..........        -47,738         -47,738
  Total, Adjustments....................        -47,738         -47,738
  Total, Weapons Activities.............      7,868,409       8,088,409
 
 
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
  Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
   Programs
    Global threat reduction initiative..        424,487         447,487
 
    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
      Operations and maintenance........        388,838         388,838
 
    Nonproliferation and international          141,675         141,675
     security...........................
 
    International material protection           369,625         346,625
     and cooperation....................
 
    Fissile materials disposition
      U.S. surplus fissile materials
       disposition
        Operations and maintenance
          U.S. plutonium disposition....        157,557         157,557
          U.S. uranium disposition......         25,000          25,000
  Total, Operations and maintenance.....        182,557         182,557
        Construction:
          99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel             320,000         320,000
           fabrication facility,
           Savannah River, SC...........
  Total, Construction...................        320,000         320,000
  Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials         502,557         502,557
   disposition..........................
  Total, Fissile materials disposition..        502,557         502,557
 
    Legacy contractor pensions..........         93,703          93,703
  Total, Defense Nuclear                      1,920,885       1,920,885
   Nonproliferation Programs............
 

[[Page 9040]]

 
  Nuclear counterterrorism incident             181,293         181,293
   response program.....................
 
  Counterterrorism and                           74,666          74,666
   counterproliferation programs........
  Subtotal, Defense Nuclear                   2,176,844       2,176,844
   Nonproliferation.....................
 
  Adjustments
    Use of prior year balances..........        -36,702         -36,702
  Total, Adjustments....................        -36,702         -36,702
  Total, Defense Nuclear                      2,140,142       2,140,142
   Nonproliferation.....................
 
 
Naval Reactors
  Naval reactors operations and                 455,740         453,740
   infrastructure.......................
  Naval reactors development............        419,400         419,400
  Ohio replacement reactor systems              126,400         126,400
   development..........................
  S8G Prototype refueling...............        144,400         144,400
  Program direction.....................         44,404          44,404
  Construction:
    14-D-902 KL Materials                         1,000           1,000
     characterization laboratory
     expansion, KAPL....................
    14-D-901 Spent fuel handling                 45,400          45,400
     recapitalization project, NRF......
    13-D-905 Remote-handled low-level            21,073          21,073
     waste facility, INL................
    13-D-904 KS Radiological work and               600           2,600
     storage building, KSO..............
    Naval Reactor Facility, ID..........          1,700           1,700
  Total, Construction...................         69,773          71,773
  Subtotal, Naval Reactors..............      1,260,117       1,260,117
 
  Adjustments:
    Use of prior year balances (Naval           -13,983         -13,983
     reactors)..........................
  Total, Naval Reactors.................      1,246,134       1,246,134
 
 
Office Of The Administrator
  Office of the administrator...........        397,784         389,784
  Total, Office Of The Administrator....        397,784         389,784
 
 
Defense Environmental Cleanup
  Closure sites:
    Closure sites administration........          4,702           4,702
 
  Hanford site:
    River corridor and other cleanup            393,634         393,634
     operations.........................
    Central plateau remediation.........        513,450         513,450
    Richland community and regulatory            14,701          14,701
     support............................
  Total, Hanford site...................        921,785         921,785
 
  Idaho National Laboratory:
    Idaho cleanup and waste disposition.        362,100         362,100
    Idaho community and regulatory                2,910           2,910
     support............................
  Total, Idaho National Laboratory......        365,010         365,010
 
  NNSA sites
    Lawrence Livermore National                   1,476           1,476
     Laboratory.........................
    Nuclear facility D & D Separations           23,700          23,700
     Process Research Unit..............
    Nevada..............................         61,897          61,897
    Sandia National Laboratories........          2,814           2,814
    Los Alamos National Laboratory......        219,789         219,789
  Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites        309,676         309,676
 
  Oak Ridge Reservation:
    OR Nuclear facility D & D...........         73,716          73,716
    OR cleanup and disposition..........        115,855         115,855
    OR reservation community and                  4,365           4,365
     regulatory support.................
  Total, Oak Ridge Reservation..........        193,936         193,936
 
  Office of River Protection:
    Waste treatment and immobilization
     plant
      01-D-416 A-E/ORP-0060 / Major             690,000         690,000
       construction.....................
 
    Tank farm activities
      Rad liquid tank waste                     520,216         520,216
       stabilization and disposition....
  Total, Office of River protection.....      1,210,216       1,210,216
 
  Savannah River sites:
    Savannah River risk management              432,491         432,491
     operations.........................
    SR community and regulatory support.         11,210          11,210
 
    Radioactive liquid tank waste:
      Radioactive liquid tank waste             552,560         647,560
       stabilization and disposition....

[[Page 9041]]

 
      Construction:
        05-D-405 Salt waste processing           92,000          92,000
         facility, Savannah River.......
  Total, Construction...................         92,000          92,000
  Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste..        644,560         739,560
  Total, Savannah River site............      1,088,261       1,183,261
 
  Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
    Waste isolation pilot plant.........        203,390         203,390
  Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant....        203,390         203,390
 
  Program direction.....................        280,784         280,784
  Program support.......................         17,979          17,979
 
  Safeguards and Security:
    Oak Ridge Reservation...............         18,800          18,800
    Paducah.............................          9,435           9,435
    Portsmouth..........................          8,578           8,578
    Richland/Hanford Site...............         69,078          69,078
    Savannah River Site.................        121,196         121,196
    Waste Isolation Pilot Project.......          4,977           4,977
    West Valley.........................          2,015           2,015
  Technology development................         24,091          34,091
  Subtotal, Defense environmental             4,853,909       4,958,909
   cleanup..............................
 
  Uranium enrichment D&D fund                   463,000               0
   contribution.........................
 
  Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup..      5,316,909       4,958,909
 
 
Other Defense Activities
  Health, safety and security
    Health, safety and security.........        143,616         143,616
    Program direction...................        108,301         108,301
  Total, Health, safety and security....        251,917         251,917
 
  Specialized security activities.......        196,322         196,322
 
  Office of Legacy Management
    Legacy management...................        163,271         163,271
    Program direction...................         13,712          13,712
  Total, Office of Legacy Management....        176,983         176,983
 
  Defense-related activities
  Defense related administrative support
    Chief financial officer.............         38,979          38,979
    Chief information officer...........         79,857          79,857
  Total, Defense related administrative         118,836         118,836
   support..............................
 
  Office of hearings and appeals........          5,022           5,022
  Subtotal, Other defense activities....        749,080         749,080
  Total, Other Defense Activities.......        749,080         749,080
------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The Acting CHAIR. No amendment to that amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be in order except those printed in part B of House 
Report 113-108 and amendments en bloc described in section 3 of House 
Resolution 260.
  Except as provided by the order of the House of today, each amendment 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108 shall be considered only by 
the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 
amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question.
  It shall be in order at any time for the chair of the Committee on 
Armed Services or his designee to offer amendments en bloc consisting 
of amendments printed in part B of House Report 113-108 not earlier 
disposed of. Amendments en bloc shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services or their 
designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject 
to a demand for division of the question. The original proponent of an 
amendment included in such amendments en bloc may insert a statement in 
the Congressional Record immediately before the disposition of the 
amendments en bloc.

                              {time}  1440


                 Amendment No. 1 Offered by Mr. McKeon

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 1 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the manager's 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 400, line 15, after ``committees'' insert the 
     following: ``the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
     Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives''.
       Page 405, line 9, after the period insert the following: 
     ``The Secretary of Defense shall submit any such classified 
     annex to the congressional defense committees.''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.

[[Page 9042]]


  Mr. McKEON. This is the manager's amendment, and it has been worked 
on and agreed to by the minority. It contains technical and conforming 
changes, and it's noncontroversial.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, although I'm not in 
opposition, I rise to claim the time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman is recognized for 
5 minutes.
  There was no objection.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself the balance of my time just 
to say I agree with the chairman. These are technical corrections that 
we have agreed to, and I urge support.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I ask our colleagues to support this 
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The amendment was agreed to.


               Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 2 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle C of title I, insert the following 
     new section:

     SEC. 123. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN NUMBER OF 
                   AIRCRAFT CARRIERS OF THE NAVY.

       (a) In General.--Section 5062(b) of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by striking ``11'' and inserting ``10''.
       (b) Conforming Repeal.--Section 1023 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
     111-84; 123 Stat. 2447) is repealed.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Oregon.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
  I appreciate the hard work that the committee has undertaken. We have 
before you a bipartisan amendment also offered by my colleagues Mr. 
Mulvaney and Mr. Bentivolio. The purpose of the amendment is simple: it 
will help make the naval fleet stronger and more sustainable by 
allowing the Navy to decide the level of aircraft carriers in the 
future; stay at the current level of 10 at some point in the future 
instead of going back to a congressionally mandated level. It does not 
eliminate any aircraft carriers.
  The entire Department of Defense is in the midst of a major reality 
check as budgets shrink, priorities change, and new technologies 
emerge. I don't pretend to be a naval expert, but our Navy is being 
pushed into shallow waters as a result of sequestration. And now more 
than ever, we should allow them to make the decisions.
  I have been a little concerned that some people in opposition say 
that this amendment would make a 10-carrier fleet permanent. Nothing 
could be further from the truth. It simply will allow the Navy to 
decide if it wants 10 aircraft carriers at some point in the next three 
decades. Now, if they're afraid that this will happen, then it means 
they think that the Navy 5 years, 10 years, 20 years from now will 
decide that they have higher strategic needs.
  The history of the 12-carrier requirement was imposed for the first 
time in two centuries by Congress in 2006. That number, being 
unsustainable, was reduced to 11 in 2007. That cap still being too 
high, the Navy had to seek a waiver from the Congress to temporarily 
drop it to 10.
  If the amendment passes, the Navy will still go back to 11 carriers 
in 2016 when the Ford is commissioned. But at that point, we should 
allow the Navy to decide, not people in Congress.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the 5 minutes in 
opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina 
(Mr. McIntyre).
  Mr. McINTYRE. I rise to oppose this amendment. The Navy is already 
down to 11 aircraft carriers from a high of 15 during the Cold War. We 
clearly need these 11 aircraft carriers to maintain a continuous 
presence in the Middle East, the western Pacific, and wherever else we 
may be called upon to go. Protecting our national security interests 
with our allies, such as Israel and Japan, and keeping trade lanes 
open, require the fleet of carriers that we have today.
  Also, these carriers allow the U.S. to maintain influence without 
having a base in a foreign country. Talk about saving money; carriers 
are, in reality, mobile bases. This is a critical military capability 
for the United States, and it must be maintained. Keeping aircraft 
carrier production on track is also a major jobs issue. We know that 
tens of thousands of skilled workers support building and maintaining 
our aircraft carriers, and without them, we would soon lose our ability 
to build large ships of any kind.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Virginia (Mr. Wittman), a subcommittee chairman on the Armed Services 
Committee.
  Mr. WITTMAN. Simply put, this amendment seriously jeopardizes 
national security and also our ability to project power and maintain a 
forward presence in an ever-growing dangerous world. The backbone of 
our Navy is our carrier strike force. In order to have seven carriers, 
we need to have 11. There are carriers that are in port to be refueled, 
sailors that have to rest. Eleven equals seven.
  Today we see in the Central Command, they request two aircraft 
carriers. They're only provided one in the most dangerous area of the 
world, the Middle East. If we can't meet the requirements that our 
commanders are asking for, then why would we want to be reducing the 
number of carriers? That just doesn't make sense.
  There's a misconception, too, that because we're moving out of 
Afghanistan, that somehow there won't be a need for a presence of an 
aircraft carrier there in the Arabian Gulf. That is absolutely wrong. 
We need that presence there. The way we maintain that presence is to 
make sure that we have a minimum of 11 aircraft carriers.
  Our forward presence is needed today, and we want to make sure that 
this is done, especially with the reposturing to the Asian Pacific.
  With that, Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote against this 
amendment.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from South 
Carolina (Mr. Mulvaney).
  Mr. MULVANEY. Mr. Chairman, you can imagine my surprise when I found 
out that for the last 7 years, Congress has been dictating the number 
of carriers that are in the Navy. For 230 years we were satisfied to 
let the Navy make that decision. I was just stunned to find that this 
was actually happening. I wish I had known. I could have offered an 
amendment to simply get rid of the requirement entirely, but I applaud 
my friend from Oregon for at least offering this small improvement.
  I would respectfully disagree with my friend from Virginia--this 
amendment has no impact at all on national security or national 
defense. Again, there's no impact on national security or national 
defense.
  If the amendment passes, the Navy could have 20 carriers next year if 
the Navy decided that that's what it wanted to do. All we're doing is 
taking the congressional mandate down from 11 to 10.
  I go back to the words of former Secretary Gates in 2010 to the Navy 
League. I thought it was interesting what he said. He said:

       Our current plan is to have 11 carrier strike groups 
     through 2040 to be sure the need to project power across the 
     seas will never go away, but consider the massive overmatch 
     the U.S. already enjoys. Consider, too, the growing anti-ship 
     capabilities of adversaries. Do we really need 11 carrier 
     strike groups for another 30 years when no other

[[Page 9043]]

     country has more than one? Any future plans must address 
     these realities.

  That's all we are doing, Mr. Chairman, is simply giving the Navy more 
control over how many carriers the Navy has.
  With all due respect to all of my colleagues here, I am perfectly 
willing to trust the Navy with the operations of our naval warfare, 
more so than I am Congress. With that, I ask my friends to support this 
amendment, which has no impact on national defense but gives more 
control to the Navy, to the experts in the field.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Courtney).
  Mr. COURTNEY. Mr. Chairman, as long as we are on the subject of the 
Navy, the Navy actually did report to Congress in February 2013 with 
their force structure assessment, which called for 11 carriers to be in 
the force, which followed the strategic review which President Obama 
and Secretary Gates conducted in 2011, reported in early 2012, which 
talked about the repositioning to the Asian Pacific, which my friend, 
Mr. Wittman, talked about. And, in fact, articulated the fact that we 
are going to need more naval projection with that shift in strategy and 
focus for our country's future national security needs.
  Strategy should drive decisions here in Congress, both in terms of 
the defense bill and our budgets. The Navy has spoken, in fact, as 
recently as February of this year, with a report which I would be happy 
to share with any of my colleagues, which clearly articulated an 11-
carrier force is what we need today and fits within the strategic 
review, which we have just exhaustively conducted under the leadership 
of Secretary Gates and President Obama. I urge a ``no'' vote on the 
amendment.

                              {time}  1450

  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 30 seconds just to say 
the Navy is going to have 11 carriers when the one under construction 
goes into operation. Nothing in this amendment denies them that.
  What it says is that, subsequently, going out 20 or 30 years, the 
decision about the minimum level will be left to the Navy, not 
Congress.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, who has the right to close?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has the right to 
close and has 2 minutes remaining.
  Mr. McKEON. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the remainder of the 
time.
  The notion here that somehow, unless we impose a permanent mandate on 
the Navy, they are not going to do what my friends from Connecticut and 
Virginia say they're going to do, I think, is ludicrous.
  This is a symbol of Congress micromanaging, substituting its judgment 
for that of the command structure. It is, I think, important for us to, 
in a small way, express confidence in them. They will have their 11 
aircraft carriers, as the Gerald Ford is commissioned. They'll be back 
at 11.
  The question is, are we going to have a mandate in perpetuity to 
substitute our judgment for the realities of the Navy in 5 years, 10 
years, 30 years, regardless of force structure, threats or technology?
  This is a small symbol of what's wrong with the process here and why 
we can't get control over many of the budget issues.
  I'd respectfully suggest support for this bipartisan amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of our time to the 
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Forbes), subcommittee chairman on the 
Armed Services Committee.
  Mr. FORBES. I thank the chairman.
  Mr. Chairman, one of the things that unites Republicans and Democrats 
in opposition to this amendment, that's why you've heard them take this 
floor, is that the Constitution of the United States mandates Congress 
to build strong navies. It doesn't mandate the Pentagon, it doesn't 
mandate the White House, it doesn't mandate anybody. It mandates us, 
and we will not walk away from that mandate.
  And if you look at every independent analysis, every QDR since 2001 
says we need 11 carriers. If you really believe the Navy's going to 
come in here and say they don't need them, that's not the truth. What's 
going to happen is somebody's going to give them a budget figure and 
say the budget needs to drive the strategy, and that's why you need to 
cut it down. And we're not going to put them in that position.
  Three things: they talk about costs. The reality is it could cost 
more to have fewer carriers because they don't take into consideration 
the deployment times we're going to put on the backs of our sailors, or 
the turnaround time we're going to have, or the increased maintenance 
cost.
  The second thing they don't look at is the fact that, in 2007, we 
were able to meet 90 percent of our combatant commanders' needs through 
the Navy. This year we'll only meet 51 percent because of cuts we've 
placed on their backs.
  But the final thing, Mr. Chairman--and this is the essence of all of 
it--they will come in here, and the people who advocate that will say 
this is acceptable risk.
  Do you know what acceptable risk means to them?
  It means how many ships we can lose, how many men and women we can 
lose, how much equipment we can lose in a conflict and still have the 
potential of winning if every other assumption we've made holds true.
  Mr. Chairman, we're committed to changing the definition of 
acceptable risk, and saying this: when one of our men and women go into 
battle, we're going to make sure we've done everything we can 
reasonably do to make sure they have the highest probability possible 
of returning to the country they're fighting for and the families that 
they love. And you can't do it with fewer than 11 carriers.
  That's why we're standing with this, and that's why I hope we will 
reject soundly this amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon will 
be postponed.


                 Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mrs. Lummis

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 3 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 79, after line 23, insert the following:

     SEC. 241. READINESS OF INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE 
                   FORCE.

       The Secretary of Defense shall preserve each 
     intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a 
     deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act 
     in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to--
       (1) remain a fully functioning element of the 
     interconnected and redundant command and control system of 
     the missile field; and
       (2) be made fully operational with a deployed missile.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentlewoman 
from Wyoming (Mrs. Lummis) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Wyoming.
  Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, my amendment is cosponsored by Mr. Daines 
of Montana and Mr. Cramer of North Dakota. It would require DOT to 
maintain all current 450 intercontinental ballistic missile silos in 
warm status.
  This amendment would maintain our nuclear triad, where ICBMs, along 
with submarines and bombers, work together to complicate and deter any 
attempts at a successful first strike on our country and our allies.

[[Page 9044]]

  China's nuclear arsenal is expanding. Russia and other nuclear states 
like Pakistan are modernizing. With inexperienced leaders like Kim Jung 
Un in North Korea, now is the time not to reduce our most reliable and 
transparent deterrence.
  President Obama continues to suggest further reductions in U.S. 
nuclear forces beyond the New START Treaty levels and is now bypassing 
Congress to negotiate directly with President Putin on additional 
unilateral reductions.
  It's important for Congress to legislatively require that any final 
force structure decisions occur in FY15, as currently planned, and not 
be prematurely executed.
  The ICBM force is in the final stages of more than a decade-long 
effort to replace and modernize critical-mission components. This makes 
it extremely cost effective to maintain the Minuteman III fleet over 
the next two decades.
  This amendment is budget-neutral. It simply keeps silos in warm 
status, so as not to take steps backward that would be costly to 
reverse at a later date, especially if we encountered unforeseen 
geopolitical changes.
  Congress needs to weigh in on the importance of maintaining our land-
based forces so the decision is not made without us.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Dakota 
(Mr. Cramer).
  Mr. CRAMER. Mr. Chairman, George Washington said:

       To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means 
     of preserving peace.

  Besides the United States and the United Kingdom, the rest of the 
world has never seriously considered entertaining the idea of 
eliminating their nuclear weapons. China, France, India, Iran, North 
Korea, Pakistan, and Russia are all engaged in maintaining, expanding, 
or modernizing their weapons programs.
  We should not continue down the path of reduction and degradation of 
our nuclear programs, including this important ICBM force. The cost of 
maintaining this force is minor compared to the price tag associated 
with rebuilding it should we judge incorrectly.
  Now, some will argue that the U.S. taxpayer is funding the 
maintenance of weapons never used. I submit, Mr. Chairman, that the 
U.S. taxpayer is funding the maintenance of weapons being used every 
day, successfully deterring our enemies from launching their own 
nuclear weapons.
  Mr. Chairman, this amendment will save money and may very well save 
our country.
  Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Chairman, I have the highest regard for the gentlelady from 
Wyoming. She is an outstanding Member of this body. She is doing a 
superb job of representing her constituents in Wyoming.
  I haven't had the pleasure of really getting to know the other 
gentlemen, but it is no secret that these three, the sponsors of the 
amendment, each represent an ICBM missile silo field. And these are 
wonderful bases in our fine country, but these are also bases that we 
should not give a blank check to and allow to flourish in perpetuity.
  The Cold War is over. Our men and women in uniform, led by our 
generals and admirals, are making some very important decisions about 
the best way to structure our triad, not to, in any way, give up on the 
triad, but to accommodate such things as, for example, the New START 
Treaty, which was overwhelmingly ratified by the other body just a few 
years ago.

                              {time}  1500

  There are lots of technical factors having to do with the silo fields 
and with the capability of Minuteman III missiles. There are lots of 
technical factors having to do with the other elements of our triad. 
But I would urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment despite the 
fine qualities of the sponsors of this amendment because what's good 
for a missile base in Wyoming is not necessarily good for American 
defense policy. And while I have the highest admiration for the 
gentlelady from Wyoming, we really need to put this in perspective.
  This should be seriously considered by our colleagues; and I would 
urge them, at this point, to reject the amendment overwhelmingly.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chairman, I yield 90 seconds to the gentleman from 
Montana (Mr. Daines).
  Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank Representative Lummis for 
her leadership on this critically important issue and show my strong 
support for this amendment which I have joined her and our friend from 
North Dakota in introducing today.
  Our Nation's intercontinental ballistic missiles are a vital 
component of our nuclear deterrence strategy to keep the American 
people safe from mankind's most dangerous threat. And for several 
decades, this ``peace through strength'' policy has worked.
  Malmstrom Air Force Base in Great Falls, Montana, is home to 150 of 
our Nation's ICBMs. I recently visited Malmstrom and met with the 
leaders of the 341st Missile Wing to discuss the importance of our ICBM 
mission to our national security. In fact, at the conclusion of the 
visit, Colonel Robert Stanley, the commander at Malmstrom, gave me this 
commander's coin. The motto embossed on it summarizes why our defense 
strategy is effective. And let me read it. It says this:

       Scaring the hell out of America's enemies since 1962.

  I am grateful for their role in keeping America secure and their 
enormous contributions to Montana. I believe it will be deeply unwise 
to rewrite our effective policy for peace. Our potential adversaries in 
the 21st century may differ from those during the Cold War, but a 
comprehensive nuclear deterrence capability will remain crucial to our 
national security.
  Our amendment requires the Pentagon to keep our ICBM silos in warm 
status even as adjustments pursuant to the New START Treaty are made. 
It will keep potential adversaries at bay and ensure that our crucial 
nuclear force remains flexible and responsive.
  I urge all my colleagues to vote for it.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the ranking member of 
the Armed Services Committee, Mr. Smith of Washington.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, there are two very compelling 
reasons to oppose this amendment.
  First of all, this is, again, not recognizing the reality of 
sequestration and the defense budget. The way Congress seems to have 
reacted to the reality of the fact that the defense budget has already 
been cut substantially and that because of sequestration--which nobody 
seems to want to put forward a plan to get rid of or certainly won't 
pass the House and the Senate--the defense budget is going to be cut. 
So the way Congress reacts is, okay, fine, but I have to protect mine. 
Don't close my base, don't shut down a ship, don't shut down a plane, 
and don't move anything out of the National Guard.
  All of this is an effort to preserve, in these three States, their 
military presence, which means money. And I get that. But the Pentagon 
is going to have to reduce their budget. Every time we pass one of 
these things that says you can't do this and you can't save money here 
and you can't save money there, we are creating a hollow force. The 
Pentagon will not have the funds necessary to train our troops to be 
ready to perform the missions that we need to if they can't save money 
anywhere because Congress has stepped in and said you can't because 
it's mine and I don't want to give it up.
  The second reason is we have well over 5,000 nuclear weapons. We will 
be amply able to scare the living crap out of everybody in the world 
for a very long time even if we reduce that somewhat and sensibly.
  This amendment just cramps the ability of the Pentagon to make those

[[Page 9045]]

types of sensible decisions. It will not eliminate our nuclear 
deterrence. Our nuclear deterrence is overwhelming. There is money to 
be saved in the nuclear programs. The Pentagon can sensibly do that. 
But here comes Congress, again, to say, I have to protect my own, and I 
don't care what it does to the budget.
  Fiscal conservatives should not support this amendment. We've got to 
get our budget in order. We've got to do it logically, and logically is 
not ``protect mine and I don't care about the big picture.'' That's not 
the way to approach this budget if we're going to have an adequate 
national security.
  Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from 
Alabama (Mr. Rogers).
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the gentlelady.
  As chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, I rise in support 
of this amendment, and I don't have any silos in Alabama, although I 
would like to have some.
  One of the things I want people to be cognizant of is we need to 
maintain our resiliency as we go through these negotiations. The New 
START Treaty does not require these silos be demolished. The fact is, 
as we just learned with our ground-based interceptors which President 
Obama decided 4 years ago to reduce from 44 to 30, he reversed course 
when the world got a little bit more dangerous, and now we're going 
back to put those additional 14 GBIs in Fort Greeley.
  We never know when the world's landscape is going to change. It is 
much more expensive and cumbersome to try to put new silos in than it 
is to keep these warm. I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this 
amendment.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Hultgren). The gentleman from Tennessee has 
1\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentlewoman from Wyoming's time has 
expired.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, let me close.
  Again, I have the highest regard for the gentlelady from Wyoming, but 
this is an issue of national importance. We should not allow parochial 
concerns to dominate here. She is doing an extraordinary job of 
representing her constituents, particularly those of that base. But I 
would urge, particularly my colleague from North Dakota, to be aware 
that to the extent he preserves these ICBM missile fields, he may be 
hurting, unintentionally, his nuclear-capable bomber force. So watch 
out. If you're going to be parochial, let's go all the way and be 
thoroughly parochial and don't leave part out.
  So this is a very important thing. We realize, as Members, we should 
put the national interests first. Let's listen to the Air Force, let's 
listen to STRATCOM, and let's not make pork-barrel decisions back home 
that may benefit us politically but are not in the national interest. 
We're all for a strong national defense, and I think there is 
overwhelming and bipartisan opposition to this amendment.
  So I urge my colleagues to strongly and forcefully oppose it.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentlewoman from Wyoming (Mrs. Lummis).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Wyoming 
will be postponed.


                 Amendment No. 4 Offered by Mr. Pearce

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 4 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 93, after line 7, insert the following:

     SEC. 267. APPROVAL OF CERTAIN NEW USES OF RESEARCH, 
                   DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION LAND.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, the Secretary of Defense, or the head of any other 
     department or agency of the Federal Government, may not 
     finalize any decision regarding new land use activity on 
     covered land unless the Secretary concerned approves such 
     activity in writing.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``covered land'' means ranges, test areas, or 
     other land in the contiguous United States used by the 
     Secretary of Defense for activities related to research, 
     development, test, and evaluation that the Secretary 
     determines, for purposes of this section, to be critical to 
     national security.
       (2) The term ``new land use activity'' means an activity 
     regarding the use of covered land that--
       (A) as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is not 
     carried out on covered land; and
       (B) is carried out by, or in cooperation with, a department 
     or agency of the Federal Government other than the Department 
     of Defense.
       (3) The term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given 
     that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States 
     Code.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from New Mexico (Mr. Pearce) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New Mexico.
  Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1\1/2\ minutes.
  Right now, emerging technologies critical to our readiness and the 
safety of our soldiers has developed 23 major range and test facilities 
within DOD. Recently, a problem has come to our attention, and that 
problem plays out in the White Sands Missile Range that's in my 
district.
  Basically, this center piece of the range is controlled by DOD, the 
land and the air above it. These pieces here, the north and the south, 
the air is controlled by the Department of Defense, the Secretary of 
the Army, but the land is controlled by the BLM. And the BLM recently 
has approved an encroachment across this land which threatens 33 
percent of the missions in White Sands.
  There's a launch facility that is up in this very northern corner, 
and we use the entire 140-mile length. It's the largest overland test 
base, and we use that to test these new emerging technologies. With the 
encroachment, then it endangers fully one-third of the missions of the 
base.
  So our amendment simply says that no Secretary of any agency should 
be able to come in here and put at risk these tests of the 23 different 
sites located with DOD and with a split jurisdiction like we have here. 
It's a very simple amendment. It simply says that you've got to go 
through the process and ask the people here.
  With that, I reserve the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1510

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  While I understand the importance of the Department of Defense's role 
in all this, there are other agencies that also have an important role.
  The National Resources Committee minority has expressed concerns 
about this because the Bureau of Land Management has their interests, 
as well as a bunch of other Federal agencies. So this basically gives 
the Department of Defense a veto power over land use. I want to make 
sure that the Department of Defense's interests are looked after, but 
they're not the only interests that exists in our country. So a proper 
balance of those interests I think would be a proper approach.
  This amendment just says Department of Defense basically gets the 
ultimate veto, and I think that gives it too much power. So I'd prefer 
to see a more balanced approach and oppose the amendment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. PEARCE. I yield the gentlewoman from Tennessee (Mrs. Black) 1\1/
2\ minutes.
  Mrs. BLACK. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, as a cochairman of the Congressional Range and Testing

[[Page 9046]]

Center Caucus, I rise in support of Congressman Pearce's amendment to 
the National Defense Authorization Act.
  The Major Range and Test Facility Base is made up of 23 installations 
across the country, including the Arnold Air Force Base based in 
Tullahoma, Tennessee. The critical testing and evaluation capabilities 
of the installations are truly a national asset vital to our security. 
The testing and evaluation performed at these facilities, though often 
done behind the scenes, helps to ensure that our men and women in 
uniform have the equipment and the technologies they need to defend our 
country.
  It is vital that we protect these facilities against the various 
forms of encroachment that can undermine the effectiveness of their 
operation. My colleague's amendment would ensure that any new use of 
lands already owned by the Federal Government around these 
installations be approved by the Department of Defense.
  I urge my colleagues to join me in support of this commonsense 
amendment that strengthens our national security.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Utah 
(Mr. Bishop).
  Mr. BISHOP of Utah. I appreciate the invitation from Mr. Pearce.
  This problem illustrates a couple of overwhelming problems we have. 
One is that agencies don't talk one with another. When the FAA closed 
towers down, they put three military bases in a difficult situation 
because they didn't talk. When NASA changed its policy on manned space 
flight, it increased the cost of our missile defense system because the 
agencies flat out didn't talk.
  Here is another situation of agencies that simply are not working 
together, which illustrates a second reason why, in this bill, when we 
try to talk about land, we're not talking about withdrawing land so 
that two different agencies have the same land. We're trying to do 
transfers of land so one agency can make the decision--in this case, it 
should be the military.
  Now, as subcommittee chairman for the Public Lands Subcommittee in 
the Resources, I want to say I support this amendment, and I would ask 
that people would pass this amendment. There may be some areas of 
trying to change some of the language to limit the scope of what we are 
doing here, which could easily be done in conference if this amendment 
is placed on the table in the first place. We already have language in 
there that deals with White Sands, but this amendment would have to be 
in addition to that.
  So I would urge my colleagues to actually vote in favor of this. If 
there are some areas that we need to scope down again, we can easily 
accomplish that if we have the opportunity of doing so in a conference.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I continue to reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. PEARCE. Mr. Chairman, again, the situation is quite simple and 
quite transparent. We're just trying to resolve who can make the 
decisions on land that is owned by one agency and aerospace owned by 
the other.
  Nowhere else in the U.S., nowhere else in the world do we have this 
long, uninterrupted range in which we can test weapons. The recovery of 
the bodies of those weapons gives us great insight into the failures or 
the successes. So if we're going to preserve this national asset, this 
ability to test new and different weapons, then let's get a clear line 
of understanding.
  I would urge passage of the amendment and yield back the balance of 
my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of 
my time and just say I think the gentleman from Utah makes a very 
reasonable point. Certainly, one agency shouldn't be shutting something 
down that has a negative impact on another without consulting them. 
Perhaps if we work on this amendment to figure out some way where 
consultation is required, there is some sort of balance. It's just the 
way this amendment is written, it gives the Department of Defense the 
ability to do what the gentleman from Utah just said the other agency 
did, which is just whack it and not talk to anybody else.
  So we're happy to continue to work on this going forward. In its 
present form, I am still opposed to it.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from New Mexico (Mr. Pearce).
  The amendment was agreed to.


                 Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Coffman

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 5 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       In section 301, strike ``Funds are hereby authorized'' and 
     insert the following:
       (a) In General.--Funds are hereby authorized
       In section 301, add at the end the following:
       (b) Funding.--
       (1) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts specified in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 301 for operation and maintenance, as 
     specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, 
     is hereby increased by a total of $250,000,000, to alleviate 
     training and readiness shortfalls, to be derived as follows:
       (A) Operation and Maintenance, Army, for Maneuver Units, 
     Line 010, $85,000,000.
       (B) Operation and Maintenance, Army, for Aviation Assets, 
     Line 060, $35,000,000.
       (C) Operation and Maintenance, Navy, for Mission and Other 
     Flight Operations, Line 010, $32,500,000.
       (D) Operation and Maintenance, Navy, for Fleet Air 
     Training, Line 020, $7,500,000.
       (E) Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps, for 
     Operational Forces, Line 010, $25,000,000.
       (F) Operation and Maintenance, Air Force, for Primary 
     Combat Forces, Line 010, $65,000,000.
       (2) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts specified in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 201 for Research, Development, Test, 
     and Evaluation, Defensewide, as specified in the 
     corresponding funding table in section 4201 for the Defense 
     Rapid Innovation Program, is hereby reduced by $250,000,000.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Colorado (Mr. Coffman) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, my amendment, No. 208, cuts $250 million 
from the Defense Rapid Innovation Program--or commonly called DRIP--and 
moves the money to alleviate training and readiness shortfalls.
  The DRIP program is a relatively new program started by Congress in 
the wake of the earmark ban in 2010. The funding was not requested by 
the Department of Defense, and Congress uses the program through DOD to 
provide grants to small businesses. The funding can be better applied.
  Yesterday, Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter said the sequester 
hits particularly hard in the operations and maintenance accounts. As a 
result, training is hurt and our Nation's military readiness plummets. 
This is unacceptable.
  But we can't just bemoan this fact; we have to address it. It is our 
duty to our men and women in uniform and our Nation's security to 
ensure that we spend our defense dollars in the most efficient and 
critical way possible. A quarter billion dollars for the DRIP program 
is not the wisest use of our tax dollars.
  As a former small business owner, I am naturally very protective of 
our Nation's small businesses. I understand the pressures they operate 
under.
  But I am also aware of the effect sequestration is having on our 
military's operations and maintenance accounts. We are seeing across-
the-board cuts to vital operational funding. The Air Force grounded 13 
squadrons for the year. The Navy has canceled ship deployments and 
deferred maintenance. The Army has canceled major training exercises 
for the year.
  While I am sure that there have been good results from some of the 
spending in the DRIP program, I am sure that this program is 
duplicative of many other efforts in the Department of Defense.
  There is already $76 million for quick reaction special projects, $62 
million

[[Page 9047]]

for emerging capabilities technology development, $174 million for 
joint capability technology demonstrations, and $34 million for the 
Defense-Wide Manufacturing Science & Technology program.
  There is over $1 billion for Department of Defense Small Business 
Innovation Research funding, and so on, DARPA, joint programs, and 
technical support programs. Transferring this money will not leave 
small businesses or technology development without funding. What it 
will do is signal to the American people that we are willing to make 
the hard choices necessary to prioritize our men and women in uniform 
by supporting the operations and maintenance accounts they rely on, 
which are a higher priority than the potential DRIP results.
  I repeat, the DRIP program was set up in 2010 as a way to get around 
the ban on earmarks. In today's restrictive fiscal climate, we have 
higher defense spending priorities that we should fund instead. I ask 
for your support for this amendment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I rise in opposition to the amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, if this amendment passes, we 
will strip away one of the main tools that we have in the defense 
budget to ensure that small businesses continue to be part of the 
defense industrial base.

                              {time}  1520

  The Rapid Innovation Fund was created a couple of years ago in order 
to ensure that small businesses that had technology, that had resources 
to help the war fighter could get funding to develop that technology to 
develop those resources and get service to the warfighter sooner rather 
than later.
  In 2011 alone, over 3,500 white papers were submitted and evaluated--
proposals for the Rapid Innovation Fund--3,500. Two hundred final 
proposals were invited. Out of that total 3,500, 177 awards were made, 
95 percent of which went to small businesses, 80 percent to current or 
prior SBIR participants; and the average product value of $2.2 million, 
awards to companies in 32 States and in the District of Columbia.
  This is an important program to help small businesses continue to be 
part of the defense industrial base. We should not strip RIF funding 
out of the bill. If we are going to deal with operations and 
maintenance, let's do what everybody on the committee wants to do: 
let's stop the sequester, replace the sequester with something more 
balanced to ensure that the O&M accounts, as well as great programs 
like RIF, are funded.
  With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, every dollar wasted in the defense budget 
is a dollar not spent on defending this country. This is not a program 
that was ever requested by the Department of Defense. This is a jobs 
program. I think, given the fact that the Defense Department is under 
incredible stress, that we've got to fund the priorities that our men 
and women on the front lines need. And that is putting this $250 
million to operations and maintenance--$250 million to the spending 
program that is already duplicated in other parts of the Department of 
Defense budget.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I would like to request how 
much time I have remaining.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington has 3\1/2\ minutes. 
The gentleman from Colorado has 1\1/2\ minutes.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield 1 
minute to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Shuster).
  Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  I just want to echo what the gentleman from Washington said. This is 
an extremely important program to small business that operates in the 
defense industrial base. We are making it more and more difficult for 
them to operate. This fund, the Rapid Innovation Fund, is just the 
solution to keeping them involved in the innovation and coming out with 
new products, faster products. So in the long run, this is going to 
save money. It is going to have new products the warfighters need. This 
fund has been very important to them.
  Mr. Larsen and I chaired a panel on this, a panel on business 
challenges in the defense industry. We traveled the country listening 
to small businesses. This was what they asked for. It was so important 
to the development of their products. In fact, when we started this, we 
had Secretary Rumsfeld come before the committee and say, when I asked 
him, What would you recommend to businesses doing business with the 
Department of Defense? And he said, I recommend they don't do business. 
It's so difficult. In fact, he said, It's like sleeping with a 
hippopotamus. Eventually, it's going to roll over and crush you, and it 
will never know that it did it.
  This is extremely important to the small business community to keep 
them engaged. The big defense contractors need the small folks there 
developing and innovating.
  I urge a ``no'' vote on the Coffman amendment.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, the question before us, in an environment 
of limited resources, is whether we fund an economic development 
program for small business. And as a former small business owner, I 
certainly would think under normal circumstances that would be 
important. But we're doing it out of the Department of Defense budget, 
and we're doing it at the expense of priorities within the Department 
of Defense.
  The Department of Defense is not asking for this program. What the 
Department of Defense is saying is that there are shortages in funding 
operations and maintenance. So I believe that it's critically important 
to take this $250 million that the Department of Defense is now 
requesting and put it into an area where they are requesting.
  Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the 
gentlelady from California (Ms. Sanchez).
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition 
to this amendment. I understand my colleague's concern with the 
shortfall in the Department's operations and maintenance accounts, but 
that's really a product of sequestration.
  What we are really talking about is innovation here. Innovation 
generally doesn't happen in the big companies. It happens in the small 
companies, the companies that are able to move quickly so that we get 
what we need. That's what the RIF program is about. This is not an 
earmark. In fact, just yesterday, the pre-notification for the fiscal 
year '13 process was released. It said: ``Any and all companies can put 
forward proposals.'' That's not an earmark.
  The RIF process contributes to cost savings to the services' training 
activities. In fact, the Navy added ``cost reduction'' as a critical 
focus area in the fiscal year '12 Rapid Innovation Fund broad agency 
announcement. Several of these selected RIF projects actually seek to 
reduce operations and maintenance costs to include the cost of 
training.
  I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado has 30 seconds 
remaining.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, in this bill, there's already $76 million 
for Quick Reaction Special Projects, $62 million for emerging 
capabilities technology development, $174 million for joint capability 
technology demonstrations, and $34 million for the Defense-Wide 
Manufacturing Science and Technology program. The Department of Defense 
Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology 
Transfer programs spend about $1 billion per year in research and 
development funding for our Nation's small technology companies. The 
issues that they're talking about are already addressed in multiple 
ways; and this is,

[[Page 9048]]

unfortunately, wasteful Pentagon spending that should be cut.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, could I request how much time 
I have remaining.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington has 1\1/2\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute 
to the gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin).
  (Mr. LANGEVIN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  While I fully understand and appreciate the gentleman from Colorado's 
intention, I must strongly disagree with his amendment, specifically 
its choice of offset. Cutting our future to pay for the present is the 
very definition of penny-wise and pound-foolish. This amendment would 
have a severe negative impact on small businesses in the defense 
industry.
  The Rapid Innovation Fund was created by the Armed Services 
Committee. It is a fully competitive program to facilitate the rapid 
insertion of innovative small business technologies and processes into 
military systems or programs that meet critical national security needs 
of the warfighter. Projects are under way now, and just yesterday the 
pre-notification for the FY 13 process was released.
  The Rapid Innovation Fund process contributes to the cost savings of 
the services' training activities. In fact, the Navy added cost 
reduction as a critical focus area in its FY 12 Rapid Innovation Fund 
broad agency announcement. Several of the selected RIF projects 
actually seek to reduce O&M costs, to include the cost of training. 
According to the Department:

       RIF has a high return on investment while providing a venue 
     for the timely, innovative solutions from small businesses to 
     our near-term challenges.

  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 30 
seconds.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
  In conclusion, I would ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this 
amendment. I think we have made a good case. I think folks have heard 
the argument.
  Just a final note. The defense business panel that Mr. Shuster of 
Pennsylvania spoke of, we did travel around the country, talking to 
small businesses all around the country in many States; and everywhere 
we heard that this is the program, the Rapid Innovation Fund is the 
program that they see as most valuable. They want us to keep this in 
place.
  I would ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment, and with 
that I yield back the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1530

  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Coffman).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado 
will be postponed.


             Amendments En Bloc No. 1 Offered by Mr. McKeon

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments 
en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 1 consisting of amendment Nos. 7, 8, 16, 17, 
24, 26, 30, 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, 48, 62, 94, 111, 113, 130, 154, and 
159, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of 
California:


           amendment no. 7 offered by ms. frankel of florida

       At the end of section 549, add the following new 
     subsections:
       (c) Additional Duty for Response Systems Panel Regarding 
     Instances of Members' Abusing Chain of Command Position to 
     Gain Access to or Coerce Another Person for a Sex-related 
     Offense.--
       (1) In general.--The independent panel established by the 
     Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an 
     assessment of instances in the Armed Forces in which a member 
     of the Armed Forces has committing a sexual act upon another 
     person by abusing one's position in the chain of command of 
     the other person to gain access to or coerce the other 
     person.
       (2) Submission of results.--The panel shall include the 
     results of the assessment and its recommendations and 
     comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such 
     section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this section.
       (d) Additional Duty for Judicial Proceedings Panel 
     Regarding Additional Revision of Definition of Article 120 
     Sex-related Offenses.--The independent panel established by 
     the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 
     576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the 
     likely consequences of amending of definition of rape and 
     sexual assault under article 120 of the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice to expressly cover a situation in which a 
     person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice 
     commits a sexual act upon another person by abusing one's 
     position in the chain of command of the other person to gain 
     access to or coerce the other person. The panel shall include 
     the results of the assessment in one of the reports required 
     by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.


        amendment no. 8 offered by mr. pierluisi of puerto rico

       Page 110, after line 15, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 334. ORDNANCE RELATED RECORDS REVIEW AND REPORTING 
                   REQUIREMENT FOR VIEQUES AND CULEBRA ISLANDS, 
                   PUERTO RICO.

       (a) Identification of Military Munitions and Navy 
     Operational History.--
       (1) Records review.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 
     a review of all existing Department of Defense records to 
     determine and describe the historical use of military 
     munitions and military training on the islands of Vieques and 
     Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The 
     review shall, to the extent practicable and based on 
     historical documents available, identify the type of 
     munitions, the quantity of munitions, and the location where 
     such munitions may have potentially been used or may be 
     remaining on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, 
     and in the nearby cays or waters. The historical review shall 
     also determine the type of various military training 
     exercises that occurred on each island and in the nearby cays 
     and waters.
       (2) Cooperation and consultation.--The Secretary of Defense 
     may request the assistance of other Federal agencies and may 
     consult the Governor of Puerto Rico as may be deemed 
     appropriate in conducting the review required by this 
     subsection and in preparing the report required by subsection 
     (b).
       (b) Report.--Not later than 450 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of 
     Representatives and the Senate, and shall make publicly 
     available, a report detailing the findings and determinations 
     of the review required by subsection (a). The report shall be 
     organized to include the information detailed in subsection 
     (a) in addition to site history, site description, real 
     estate ownership information, and any other information about 
     known military munitions and military training that occurred 
     historically on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto 
     Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The report shall 
     include any information and recommendations that the 
     Secretary deems appropriate about the potential hazards to 
     the public associated with unexploded ordnance on the islands 
     of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays 
     and waters.
       (c) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``military munitions'' has the meaning given 
     that term in section 101(e)(4) of title 10, United States 
     Code.
       (2) The term ``unexploded ordnance'' has the meaning given 
     that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States 
     Code.


          amendment no. 16 offered by mr. huelskamp of kansas

       At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following:

     SEC. 5__. MEETINGS WITH RESPECT TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY.

       (a) Notice.--
       (1) In general.--The Department of Defense shall provide to 
     the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the 
     Senate advance written notice of any meeting to be held 
     between Department employees and civilians for the purpose of 
     writing, revising, issuing, implementing, enforcing, or 
     seeking advice, input, or counsel regarding military policy 
     related to religious liberty.
       (2) Contents of notice.--Notice provided under paragraph 
     (1) shall include information on the time, date, location, 
     and anticipated attendees of the meeting and information on 
     who initiated the meeting.
       (3) Verbal notice.--If a meeting to which this subsection 
     applies is scheduled less than

[[Page 9049]]

     24 hours in advance of the meeting, the notice requirement 
     under paragraph (1) may be satisfied by a phone call if 
     Committee staff provide verbal confirmation of receipt of the 
     notice.
       (b) Reports.--Not later than 72 hours after the conclusion 
     of a meeting to which subsection (a) applies, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of 
     the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate a report on the meeting, which shall 
     include information on the time, date, location, duration, 
     and attendees of the meeting and information on who initiated 
     the meeting.


      amendment no. 17 offered by mr. fitzpatrick of pennsylvania

       Page 243, after line 8, insert the following:

     SEC. 568. REQUIREMENT TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF TUITION 
                   ASSISTANCE FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

       The Secretary of each military department shall carry out 
     tuition assistance programs for members of an Armed Force 
     under the jurisdiction of that Secretary during fiscal year 
     2014 using an amount not less than the sum of any amounts 
     appropriated or otherwise made available for tuition 
     assistance for members of that Armed Force for fiscal year 
     2014.


           amendment no. 24 offered by mr. grayson of florida

       Beginning on page 270, strike line 23 and all that follows 
     through page 271, line 2.
       Page 270, line 22, after ``State'' insert ``, the District 
     of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, 
     Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and 
     American Samoa.''


          amendment no. 26 offered by mr. bilirakis of florida

       At the end of title VI, add the following new section:

     SEC. 6__. TRANSPORTATION ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT ON A SPACE-
                   AVAILABLE BASIS FOR DISABLED VETERANS WITH A 
                   SERVICE-CONNECTED, PERMANENT DISABILITY RATED 
                   AS TOTAL.

       (a) Availability of Transportation.--Section 2641b of title 
     10, United States Code, as amended by section 622 of National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
     subsection (f):
       ``(f) Special Priority for Certain Disabled Veterans.--(1) 
     The Secretary of Defense shall provide, at no additional cost 
     to the Department of Defense and with no aircraft 
     modification, transportation on scheduled and unscheduled 
     military flights within the continental United States and on 
     scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility 
     Command on a space-available basis for any veteran with a 
     service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.
       ``(2) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1), in establishing 
     space-available transportation priorities under the travel 
     program, the Secretary shall provide transportation under 
     paragraph (1) on the same basis as such transportation is 
     provided to members of the armed forces entitled to retired 
     or retainer pay.
       ``(3) The requirement to provide transportation on 
     Department of Defense aircraft on a space-available basis on 
     the priority basis described in paragraph (2) to veterans 
     covered by this subsection applies whether or not the travel 
     program is established under this section.
       ``(4) In this subsection, the terms `veteran' and `service-
     connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 
     of title 38.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (f) of section 2641b of 
     title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), 
     shall take effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning 
     on the date of the enactment of this Act.


           amendment no. 30 offered by mr. grayson of florida

       At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

     SEC. 833. REPORT ON PROCUREMENT SUPPLY CHAIN VULNERABILITIES.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and the House of Representatives a report on how sole 
     source suppliers of components to the Department of Defense 
     procurement supply chain create vulnerabilities to military 
     attack, terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock, 
     financial crisis, or geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo 
     of key raw materials or industrial inputs.
       (b) Matters Covered.--The report required by subsection (a) 
     shall include, at a minimum, the following:
       (1) A list of the components in the Department of Defense 
     procurement supply chain for which there is a supplier that 
     controls over 50 percent of the global market.
       (2) A list of parts of the supply chain where there is 
     inadequate information to ascertain whether there is a single 
     source supplier of components.
       (3) The Secretary's recommendations on which single source 
     suppliers create vulnerabilities, as well recommendations on 
     how to reduce those vulnerabilities.
       (c) Form of Report.--The report required by subsection (a) 
     may be classified.


            amendment no. 34 offered by mr. cuellar of texas

       At the end of subtitle G of title X, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. __. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING AND USAGE PLAN.

       (a) Methods.--The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 
     Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal 
     Aviation Administration jointly shall develop and implement 
     plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing 
     and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems 
     with other appropriate departments and agencies of the 
     Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose of 
     providing capabilities to the Department of Defense to meet 
     the future requirements of combatant commanders and 
     domestically to strengthen international border security.
       (b) Report.--Not later than 270 days after date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the 
     Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to 
     Congress a report on the status of the development of the 
     plans and procedures required under subsection (a), including 
     a cost benefit analysis of the shared expenses between the 
     Department of Defense and other appropriate departments and 
     agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans.


            amendment no. 35 offered by mr. mccaul of texas

       At the end of subtitle I of title X, add the following:

     SEC. 1090. TRANSFER OR LOAN OF EQUIPMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF 
                   HOMELAND SECURITY RELATING TO BORDER SECURITY.

       The Secretary of Defense may coordinate with the Secretary 
     of Homeland Security to identify and provide for the transfer 
     or long-term loan to the Department of Homeland Security of 
     equipment the Secretary of Defense determines to be excess 
     and the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be 
     appropriate in order to increase situational awareness and 
     achieve operational control of the international borders of 
     the United States.


         amendment no. 40 offered by ms. duckworth of illinois

       Page 582, insert after line 25 the following (and conform 
     the table of contents accordingly):

     SEC. 1607. REPORTING ON GOALS FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS 
                   AWARDED TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.

       Subsection (h) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 
     U.S.C. 644) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(h) Reporting on Goals for Procurement Contracts Awarded 
     to Small Business Concerns.--
       ``(1) Agency reports.--At the conclusion of each fiscal 
     year, the head of each Federal agency shall submit to the 
     Administrator a report describing--
       ``(A) the extent of the participation by small business 
     concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by 
     veterans (including service-disabled veterans), qualified 
     HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns 
     owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned 
     and controlled by women in the procurement contracts of such 
     agency during such fiscal year;
       ``(B) whether the agency achieved the goals established for 
     the agency under subsection (g)(2) with respect to such 
     fiscal year;
       ``(C) any justifications for a failure to achieve such 
     goals; and
       ``(D) a remediation plan with proposed new practices to 
     better meet such goals, including analysis of factors leading 
     to any failure to acheive such goals.
       ``(2) Reports by administrator.--Not later than 60 days 
     after receiving a report from each Federal agency under 
     paragraph (1) with respect to a fiscal year, the 
     Administrator shall submit to the President and Congress, and 
     to make available on a public Web site, an annual report that 
     includes--
       ``(A) a copy of each report submitted to the Administrator 
     under paragraph (1);
       ``(B) a determination of whether each goal established by 
     the President under subsection (g)(1) for such fiscal year 
     was achieved;
       ``(C) a determination of whether each goal established by 
     the head of a Federal agency under subsection (g)(2) for such 
     fiscal year was achieved;
       ``(D) the reasons for any failure to achieve a goal 
     established under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (g) for 
     such fiscal year and a description of actions planned by the 
     applicable agency to address such failure, including the 
     Administrator's comments and recommendations on the proposed 
     remediation plan; and
       ``(E) for the Federal Government and each Federal agency, 
     an analysis of the number and dollar amount of prime 
     contracts awarded during such fiscal year to--
       ``(i) small business concerns--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;

[[Page 9050]]

       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns; and
       ``(IV) through unrestricted competition;

       ``(ii) small business concerns owned and controlled by 
     service-disabled veterans--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans; 
     and
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition;

       ``(iii) qualified HUBZone small business concerns--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted to qualified HUBZone 
     small business concerns;
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition where a price 
     evaluation preference was used; and
       ``(VI) through unrestricted competition where a price 
     evaluation preference was not used;

       ``(iv) small business concerns owned and controlled by 
     socially and economically disadvantaged individuals--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals;
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition; and
       ``(VI) by reason of that concern's certification as a small 
     business owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals;

       ``(v) small business concerns owned by an Indian tribe (as 
     such term is defined in section 8(a)(13)) other than an 
     Alaska Native Corporation--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals; and
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition;

       ``(vi) small business concerns owned by a Native Hawaiian 
     Organization--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals; and
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition;

       ``(vii) small business concerns owned by an Alaska Native 
     Corporation--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through sole source contracts;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals; and
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition; and

       ``(viii) small business concerns owned and controlled by 
     women--

       ``(I) in the aggregate;
       ``(II) through competitions restricted to small business 
     concerns;
       ``(III) through competitions restricted using the authority 
     under section 8(m)(2);
       ``(IV) through competitions restricted using the authority 
     under section 8(m)(2) and in which the waiver authority under 
     section 8(m)(3) was used; and
       ``(V) through unrestricted competition; and

       ``(F) for the Federal Government, the number, dollar 
     amount, and distribution with respect to the North American 
     Industry Classification System of subcontracts awarded during 
     such fiscal year to small business concerns, small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, 
     qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business 
     concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned 
     and controlled by women, provided that such information is 
     publicly available through data systems developed pursuant to 
     the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 
     2006 (Public Law 109-282), or otherwise available as provided 
     in paragraph (3).
       ``(3) Access to data.--
       ``(A) Federal procurement data system.--To assist in the 
     implementation of this section, the Administration shall have 
     access to information collected through the Federal 
     Procurement Data System, Federal Subcontracting Reporting 
     System, or any new or successor system.
       ``(B) Agency procurement data sources.--To assist in the 
     implementation of this section, the head of each contracting 
     agency shall provide, upon request of the Administration, 
     procurement information collected through agency data 
     collection sources in existence at the time of the request. 
     Contracting agencies shall not be required to establish new 
     data collection systems to provide such data."''.


           amendment no. 41 offered by mr. murphy of florida

       At the end of subtitle B of title XXVIII, add the following 
     new section:

     SEC. 28__. REPORT ON UTILIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
                   REAL PROPERTY.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to Congress a report on the utilization of real 
     property across the Department of Defense.
       (b) Elements of Report.--The report required by subsection 
     (a) shall describe the following:
       (1) The strategy of the Department of Defense for 
     maximizing utilization of existing facilities, progress 
     implementing this strategy, and obstacles to implementing 
     this strategy.
       (2) The efforts of the Department of Defense to 
     systematically collect, process, and analyze data on real 
     property utilization to aid in the planning and 
     implementation of the strategy referred to in paragraph (1).
       (3) The number of underutilized Department facilities, to 
     be defined as facilities rated less than 66 percent 
     utilization, and unutilized Department facilities, to be 
     defined as facilities rated at zero percent utilization, in 
     the Real Property Inventory Database of the Department of 
     Defense.
       (4) The annual cost of maintaining and improving such 
     underutilized and unutilized Department facilities.
       (5) The efforts of the Department of Defense to dispose of 
     underutilized and unutilized facilities.
       (c) Classified Annex.--The report required by subsection 
     (a) may include a classified annex if necessary to fully 
     describe the matters required by subsection (b).


            amendment no. 42 offered by mr. mccaul of texas

       At the end of subtitle I of title X, add the following:

     SEC. 1090. TRANSFER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY OF 
                   THE TETHERED AEROSTAT RADAR SYSTEM.

       Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 
     September 30, 2013, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to 
     transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to accept from 
     the Secretary of Defense, full contract ownership and 
     management responsibilities for the existing Tethered 
     Aerostat Radar System (TARS) program and contracts. Neither 
     the Department of Defense nor the Department of Homeland 
     Security shall be required to reimburse the other agency for 
     any services under the TARS program.


         amendment no. 48 offered by ms. brownley of california

       At the end of subtitle B of title III, add the following 
     new section:

     SEC. 3__. MILITARY READINESS AND SOUTHERN SEA OTTER 
                   CONSERVATION.

       (a) Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military 
     Readiness Areas.--Chapter 631 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     section:

     ``Sec. 7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military 
       Readiness Areas

       ``(a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
     establish areas to be known as `Southern Sea Otter Military 
     Readiness Areas' for national defense purposes. Such areas 
     shall include each of the following:
       ``(1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San 
     Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and 
     surrounding waters within the following coordinates:
       ``N. Latitude/W. Longitude
       ``3327.8'/11934.3'
       ``3320.5'/11915.5'
       ``3313.5'/11911.8'
       ``3306.5'/11915.3'
       ``3302.8'/11926.8'
       ``3308.8'/11946.3'
       ``3317.2'/11956.9'
       ``3330.9'/11954.2';
       ``(2) That area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San 
     Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters 
     running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high 
     tide line designated by 33 C.F.R. part 165 on May 20, 2010, 
     as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.
       ``(b) Activities Within the Southern Sea Otter Military 
     Readiness Areas.--
       ``(1) Incidental takings under endangered species act of 
     1973.--Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
     (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the 
     incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern 
     Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of 
     conducting a military readiness activity.
       ``(2) Incidental takings under marine mammal protection act 
     of 1972.--Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal 
     Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply 
     with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea 
     otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in 
     the course of conducting military readiness activities.

[[Page 9051]]

       ``(3) Treatment as species proposed to be listed.--For 
     purposes of any military readiness activity, any southern sea 
     otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness 
     Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the 
     Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member 
     of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered 
     species or a threatened species under section 4 of the 
     Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533).
       ``(c) Removal.--Nothing in this section or any other 
     Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern 
     sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military 
     Readiness Areas as of the effective date of this section or 
     thereafter be removed from the Areas.
       ``(d) Revision or Termination of Exceptions.--The Secretary 
     of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of 
     subsection (b) if the Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of the Navy, determines that military activities 
     authorized under subsection (b) are impeding southern sea 
     otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to 
     optimum sustainable population levels.
       ``(e) Monitoring.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct 
     monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter 
     Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military 
     readiness activities on the growth or decline of the sea 
     otter population and on the near-shore eco-system. Monitoring 
     and research parameters and methods shall be determined in 
     consultation with the service.
       ``(2) Reports.--Within 24 months after the effective date 
     of this section and every three years thereafter, the 
     Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public 
     on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).
       ``(f) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) Incidental taking.--The term `incidental taking' 
     means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, 
     and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise 
     lawful activity.
       ``(2) Optimum sustainable population.--The term `optimum 
     sustainable population' means, with respect to any population 
     stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum 
     productivity of the population or the species, keeping in 
     mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of 
     the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.
       ``(3) Southern sea otter.--The term `southern sea otter' 
     means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.
       ``(4) Take.--The term `take'--
       ``(A) when used in reference to activities subject to 
     regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
     1531-1544) shall have the meaning given such term in that 
     statute; and
       ``(B) when used in reference to activities subject to 
     regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 
     U.S.C. 1361-1423h), shall have the meaning given such term in 
     that statute.
       ``(5) Military readiness activity.--The term `military 
     readiness activity' has the meaning given that term in 
     section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314; 
     116 Stat. 2509; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), and includes all 
     training and operations of the Armed Forces that relate to 
     combat, and the adequate and realistic testing of military 
     equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper 
     operation and suitability for combat use.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
``7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness 
              Areas.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1 of Public Law 99-625 
     (16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed.


         amendment no. 62 offered by ms. brownley of california

       Page 232, after line 18, insert the following:

     SEC. 555. TRANSITION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THEIR 
                   FAMILIES FROM MILITARY TO CIVILIAN LIFE.

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds the following:
       (1) Members of the Armed Forces and their families make 
     great sacrifices on behalf of the United States, and, when 
     their active duty service is successfully concluded, members 
     deserve the opportunity to also make a successful transition 
     to the civilian labor force.
       (2) When transitioning from active duty in the Armed Forces 
     to civilian employment, members often face barriers that make 
     it difficult to fully utilize the skills and training they 
     gained during their military service.
       (3) Members and veterans are too often required to repeat 
     education or training in order to receive industry 
     certifications and State occupational licenses, even though 
     their military training and experience often overlaps with 
     the certification or licensing requirements.
       (4) When members are transferred from military assignment 
     to military assignment, their spouses often face barriers to 
     transferring their credentials and to securing employment in 
     their new location.
       (5) More than one million members will make the transition 
     to civilian life in the coming years.
       (6) The Department of Defense established the Military 
     Credentialing and Licensing Task Force in 2012.
       (7) The Joining Forces program, a national initiative to 
     mobilize all sectors of society to give members of the Armed 
     Forces and their families the opportunities and support they 
     have earned, will make it easier for members and their 
     families to transfer skills learned while the member was 
     serving in the Armed Forces to civilian employment.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Federal Government and State governments should 
     make the transition of a member of the Armed Forces and the 
     member's spouse from military to civilian life as seamless as 
     possible by creating opportunities for the member and spouse 
     to earn, while the member is in the Armed Forces, civilian 
     occupational credentials and licenses, with an emphasis on 
     well-paying industries and occupations that have a high 
     demand for skilled workers, including: manufacturing, 
     information technology, transportation and logistics, health 
     care, and emergency medical services;
       (2) the Federal Government should assist State governments 
     in translating military training and experience into credit 
     towards professional licensure; and
       (3) State governments should streamline approaches for 
     assessing the equivalency of military training and 
     experience, and accelerate occupational licensing processes 
     for members, veterans, and their spouses.


      amendment no. 94 offered by mr. fitzpatrick of pennsylvania

       Page 335, after line 12, insert the following:

     SEC. 833. STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF CONTRACTING WITH VETERAN-
                   OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
     coordination with the Administrator of the Small Business 
     Administration and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall 
     issue a report that includes--
       (1) a description of the impacts of Department of Defense 
     contracting with small business concerns owned and controlled 
     by veterans and small business concerns owned and controlled 
     by service-disabled veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and 
     veteran unemployment;
       (2) a description of the effect that increased economic 
     opportunity for veterans has on issues such as veteran 
     suicide and veteran homelessness; and
       (3) an analysis of the feasibility and expected impacts of 
     the implementation within the Department of Defense of a 
     contracting program modeled on the program authorized under 
     section 8127 of title 38, United States Code.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section--
       (1) the term ``veteran'' has the meaning given the term 
     under section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code; and
       (2) the terms ``small business concern owned and controlled 
     by veterans'' and ``small business concern owned and 
     controlled by service-disabled veterans'' have the meanings 
     given such terms under section 3 of the Small Business Act 
     (15 U.S.C. 632).


            amendment no. 111 offered by mr. mccaul of texas

       At the end of subtitle I of title X, add the following:

     SEC. 1090. SALE OR DONATION OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR 
                   BORDER SECURITY ACTIVITIES.

       Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``border security 
     activities and'' before ``law enforcement activities''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``, the Secretary of 
     Homeland Security,'' after ``Attorney General''; and
       (2) in subsection (d), by inserting ``border security 
     activities or'' before ``counter-drug''.


            amendment no. 113 offered by mr. turner of ohio

       Page 463, after line 6, insert the following:

     SEC. 10__. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND NATIONAL AIRSPACE.

       (a) Memoranda of Understanding.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a 
     memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense 
     entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized 
     under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 
     of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access 
     nonregulatory special use airspace if such access--
       (1) is used by the entity as part of such test range 
     program; and
       (2) does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary 
     or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the 
     Department of Defense.
       (b) Established Procedures.--The Secretary shall carry out 
     subsection (a) using the established procedures of the 
     Department of Defense with respect to entering into a 
     memorandum of understanding.
       (c) Construction.--A memorandum of understanding entered 
     into under subsection

[[Page 9052]]

     (a) between the Secretary and a non-Department of Defense 
     entity shall not be construed as establishing the Secretary 
     as a partner, proponent, or team member of such entity in the 
     test range program specified in such subsection.


            amendment no. 130 offered by mr. turner of ohio

       Amend section 1244 to read as follows:

     SEC. 1244. STATEMENT OF CONGRESS ON DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH 
                   GEORGIA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The Republic of Georgia is a highly valued ally of the 
     United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment 
     to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, 
     including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the 
     NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in 
     Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq.
       (2) The peaceful transfer of power as the result of the 
     free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in October 
     2012 represents a major accomplishment toward the Georgian 
     people's creation of a free society and full democracy.
       (3) However, since the October 2012 parliamentary elections 
     the new Georgian Government has taken a series of measures 
     against former officials and members of the current political 
     opposition that appear to be motivated by political 
     considerations.
       (4) Over 100 former Georgian Government officials have been 
     charged with criminal violations since the October 2012 
     parliamentary elections.
       (5) Similar charges have been filed against members of the 
     political opposition, including Vano Merabishvili, the 
     Secretary General of the United National Movement.
       (6) The arrest of the leader of an opposition party is 
     especially troubling, particularly its chilling effect on 
     political freedom prior to the presidential election 
     scheduled for October 2013.
       (7) The Georgian Government has taken insufficient action 
     to prevent further violence against members of the United 
     National Movement and to punish offenders.
       (8) These actions call into question the Georgian 
     Government's continued progress toward the creation of a free 
     and democratic society in which basic freedoms, including 
     freedom for political opposition, are guaranteed.
       (b) Statement of Congress.--Congress declares that--
       (1) the United States remains committed to assisting the 
     people of Georgia in establishing a free and democratic 
     society in their country;
       (2) the measures taken by the Georgian Government against 
     former officials and political opponents, apparently in part 
     motivated by political considerations, may have a significant 
     negative impact on cooperation between the United States and 
     Georgia, including efforts to build a stronger relationship 
     in political, economic, and security matters, as well as 
     progress on integrating Georgia into international 
     organizations;
       (3) the United States must be unambiguous when democratic 
     backsliding occurs in a key ally after a peaceful and 
     democratic transfer of power between political parties; and
       (4) the people of the United States and the Members of 
     Congress express their deepest condolences to the Georgian 
     people on the tragic loss of seven soldiers of Georgia in a 
     suicide bombing on June 6, 2013, and the deaths of three 
     soldiers killed in another suicide bombing on May 13, 2013, 
     while they were supporting United States and NATO forces in 
     Afghanistan.


            amendment no. 154 offered by mr. turner of ohio

       At the end of section 2801, add the following new 
     subsection:
       (d) Modification and Extension of Authority for Laboratory 
     Revitalization Projects.--
       (1) In general.--Subsection (d) of section 2805 of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended--
       (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``not more than 
     $2,000,000'' and inserting ``not more than $4,000,000, 
     notwithstanding subsection (c)'';
       (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the first sentence and 
     inserting the following: ``For purposes of this subsection, 
     an unspecified minor military construction project is a 
     military construction project that (notwithstanding 
     subsection (a)) has an approved cost equal to or less than 
     $4,000,000.''
       (C) in paragraph (5), by striking ``2016'' and inserting 
     ``2020''.
       (2) Application to current projects.--The amendments made 
     by paragraph (1) do not apply to any laboratory 
     revitalization project for which the design phase has been 
     completed as of the date of the enactment of this Act.


         amendment no. 159 offered by mr. bilirakis of florida

       At the end of title XXVIII, add the following new section:

     SEC. 28__. ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY DIVERS MEMORIAL AT 
                   WASHINGTON NAVY YARD.

       (a) Memorial Authorized.--Consistent with the sense of the 
     Congress expressed in section 2855 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, the Secretary of the 
     Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain, at a 
     suitable location at the former Navy Dive School at the 
     Washington Navy Yard in the District of Columbia, a memorial 
     to honor the members of the United States Armed Forces who 
     have served as divers and whose service in defense of the 
     United States has been carried out beneath the waters of the 
     world.
       (b) Location and Design of Monument.--The actual location 
     at the Washington Navy Yard for the memorial authorized by 
     subsection (a) and the final design of the memorial shall be 
     subject to the approval of the Secretary. In selecting the 
     site to serve as the location for the memorial, the Secretary 
     shall seek to maximize visitor access to the memorial.
       (c) Military Support.--The Secretary shall provide military 
     ceremonial support at the dedication of the memorial 
     authorized by subsection (a).
       (d) Use of Federal Funds Prohibited.--Federal funds may not 
     be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the 
     memorial authorized by subsection (a), but the Secretary may 
     accept and expend contributions of non-Federal funds and 
     resources for such purposes.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Smith) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I urge the committee to adopt the 
amendments en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the 
majority and the minority.
  At this time, I yield 1 minute to my friend and colleague, the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis).
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
  I rise today in support of my amendment, which would allow disabled 
veterans with a service-connected permanent disability rated as 
``total'' to travel on military aircraft on a space-available basis.
  My amendment would allow disabled veterans, who have bravely served 
our country and who have made enormous personal sacrifices that follow 
them in their daily lives, to travel through the Space-A program at no 
additional cost to the Department of Defense. The space-available 
program is a DOD program which allows Active Duty servicemembers, their 
families, retirees, and certain others to fill empty seats on DOD 
flights. While Active Duty members and their families will remain the 
primary beneficiaries of this program in order to assist them with the 
rigors of military life, my amendment allows these veterans the same 
benefit.
  I would like to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith and 
their staffs for their assistance in the amendment process.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the 
gentlelady from Illinois (Ms. Duckworth).
  Ms. DUCKWORTH. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which 
will strengthen small business participation in government contracts.
  In my district and across the country, small businesses are the 
backbone of our economy. Small businesses innovate, know how to operate 
on a tight budget and know how to create good-paying jobs. I want small 
businesses in places like Elgin, Illinois, to be able to win government 
contracts from the Department of Defense because I know they will do 
more with taxpayer dollars and provide superior products and services 
for our men and women in uniform.
  However, the government is lagging behind on awarding contracts to 
small businesses. We are not meeting our goal of 23 percent of 
contracts going to small businesses, and 23 percent is a pretty low bar 
that we should be raising even higher, not be struggling to meet. It is 
even more unfortunate that we are also failing to award enough 
contracts to women- and veteran-owned small businesses.
  My amendment seeks to remedy this problem by asking the Small 
Business Administration and Federal agencies to include remediation 
plans in their annual reports on small business contracting goals. The 
government should explain why it is not meeting its small business 
goals. It should identify faulty past practices and propose new 
practices to increase small business participation. We need an action 
plan to support our small businesses, and my amendment will do just 
that.

[[Page 9053]]

  I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith and the committee 
staffs for their help on this amendment, and I urge my colleagues to 
support this amendment and our small businesses.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fitzpatrick).
  Mr. FITZPATRICK. I thank the chairman for the opportunity to address 
two amendments which are part of this package.
  The first is my amendment to protect military tuition assistance, an 
important tool for members of the armed services to obtain the 
necessary professional development education and to prepare themselves 
for the civilian job market upon leaving the service. Last year, 
approximately 300,000 servicemembers used tuition assistance to pursue 
their educational goals. Unfortunately, last March, the administration 
chose to end this program, and it took congressional action to overturn 
that decision.
  This amendment would prevent even the specter of ending this benefit 
from ever happening again. Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines 
deserve better.
  Second, included in this package is an amendment requiring the 
Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on veteran-owned small business 
contracting and to examine the feasibility of putting a priority on 
meeting veteran-owned small business contracting goals first, similar 
to a successful program in the VA. They will be examining how fair 
contracting practices for veteran-owned small businesses could 
positively affect veteran unemployment, homelessness and even suicide.
  Mr. Chairman, the fact is there are 250,000 servicemembers 
transitioning each year from military life to civilian life. One in 
seven is self-employed or is a small business owner, and about a 
quarter of our veterans say they are interested in starting or in 
buying their own small businesses.
  They play an important role in our economy. This Congress needs to 
help them in the transition and in getting America back to work. So I 
would like to thank the chairman and ranking member on the bill, and I 
urge support of these amendments.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 2 minutes to the gentlelady from 
Florida (Ms. Frankel).
  Ms. FRANKEL of Florida. I am the mother of a United States marine war 
veteran, and I remember well the pride my son felt when he put on his 
uniform. My constituent, Elisha Morrow, felt the same pride when at age 
22 she joined the United States Coast Guard. She started boot camp full 
of hope for her future.
  That hope quickly turned into humiliation and sorrow as her company 
commander became her enemy. First, he ordered her to clean his office, 
and he later harassed her with sexual innuendoes and advances night 
after night. Feeling hopeless and fearing retribution, Elisha stayed 
silent until the commander became more emboldened. He again ordered 
another female recruit to his office at night. This time, he ordered 
her to remove her clothes and engage in unwanted sex.
  Thankfully, the victimized servicewoman was brave enough to pursue 
charges, but because it was determined that she was not under physical 
threat and that she did not fear for her life, her assailant got away 
with the lesser offenses of cruelty and maltreatment and adultery, 
instead of being charged with rape.
  This is not full justice. When our daughters and our sons put on the 
uniform to protect us, the United States, they must be protected to the 
utmost extent from such an abuse of power. Mr. Chair, the intention of 
this amendment is to do just that.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Huelskamp).
  Mr. HUELSKAMP. I want to thank the chairman for yielding to me. I 
appreciate, especially, his efforts on the NDAA last year in which we 
were able to add language that would require the Department of Defense 
to adopt new regulations to protect the religious liberties of our 
military personnel, especially of our brave chaplains.
  However, since March and since the adoption of that law, we have sent 
three letters to the Department of Defense, asking for progress 
updates. The Department has only responded with an acknowledgment that 
it has received our letters, but, to date, we are unaware of any 
progress. Instead, it seems that secretive meetings continue with 
individuals actually opposed to religious liberties.
  In light of this delay, my amendment is very simple. It would require 
the Department to provide Congress with a report of meetings between 
employees and civilians with respect to the development of military 
policy related to religious liberty. I encourage my colleagues to 
support this amendment.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas 
(Mr. Cuellar).
  Mr. CUELLAR. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to encourage my colleagues to 
support my amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act. This 
amendment will bring the Department of Defense and other Federal, State 
and local agencies together to map out the futures of UAVs.
  I first want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith and 
their staffs for their assistance on this important issue. I also want 
to thank those who have cosponsored this amendment--Representative Gene 
Green, Representative Ted Poe and Chairman Michael McCaul.

                              {time}  1540

  This amendment calls for the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 
with the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Aviation 
Administration, to develop and implement plans to review the potential 
of joint testing training that might serve the dual purpose of 
providing capabilities to the Department of Defense to protect us 
abroad and on the international border. This amendment will go a long 
way to make sure we utilize all available resources and not waste 
taxpayers' money.
  I urge all my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Bridenstine).
  Mr. BRIDENSTINE. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to thank my friend from 
Kansas (Mr. Huelskamp) for offering amendment No. 236. He is a champion 
for religious freedom.
  As a Navy pilot with Iraq and Afghanistan combat tours, I am 
concerned that senior Air Force officials have taken advice from an 
anti-Christian zealot when drafting guidance on culture and standards.
  The president of the badly misnamed Military Religious Freedom 
Foundation, Mr. Mikey Weinstein, has described Christians as human 
monsters and monstrously savage, responsible for racism, bigotry, and 
prejudice. He even called the presence of committed Christians in the 
military a national security threat comparable to al Qaeda.
  Mr. Chairman, we're not asking to approve the military's calendar 
appointments, but given this situation, Congress needs to know when the 
military meets with anti-Christian fanatics on issues regarding 
religious liberty.
  With that, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, we have no further speakers.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. As I have no further speakers either, I 
yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. I encourage our colleagues to support the en bloc 
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. MURPHY of Florida. Mr. Chair, I rise today to offer an amendment 
to the National Defense Authorization Act that would address wasteful 
government spending on unused and underutilized facilities. The 
Department of Defense has hundreds, possibly thousands, of buildings 
and structures that it has rated at zero percent utilization. This is 
an incredible number of useless facilities that taxpayers are paying to 
maintain.

[[Page 9054]]

  The extent of this wasteful spending, however, is not currently 
known, even by the Department itself. My amendment would fix that, 
requiring the Department of Defense to disclose just how many of its 
facilities are unused or underutilized and how much it is costing 
American taxpayers to maintain these facilities. The Department of 
Defense would be required to report back to Congress in six months, 
explaining what they are doing either to dispose of these wasteful 
facilities or increase their utilization.
  By forcing the Department of Defense to take a serious look at its 
facilities, gather data on how these facilities are managed, and 
develop a coherent plan for reducing costs and improving efficiency, my 
amendment seeks to eliminate this wasteful government spending.
  Unfortunately, the Department of Defense is not the only federal 
agency that is currently wasting taxpayer money on maintaining unused 
or underutilized facilities. As a whole, the federal government must do 
a better job at managing its facilities. At times of record debt, 
taxpayers should not continue paying for unused and underused 
buildings. That is not good government, and that is not smart spending.
  That is why I recently introduced the SAVE Act to root out up to $200 
billion in wasteful and duplicative government spending over the next 
10 years. This amendment is an extension of one of the 11 common-sense 
solutions included in the bipartisan SAVE Act, holding the Department 
of Defense accountable for spending taxpayer money on facilities the 
Department itself has found to be unused or underutilized.
  We all agree that we need to reduce government spending. We should 
also all agree that the best place to start is by rooting out waste. 
This is a common-sense solution to do just that and I urge my 
colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.


                 Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Turner

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 6 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL, AND CONFINEMENT REQUIRED 
                   FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES COMMITTED BY 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Mandatory Punishments.--
       (1) Imposition.--Section 856 of title 10, United States 
     Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is 
     amended--
       (A) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The punishment''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is 
     found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall 
     be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such 
     punishment must include, at a minimum--
       ``(A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and
       ``(B) confinement for two years.
       ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:
       ``(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of 
     section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)).
       ``(B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title 
     (article 125).
       ``(C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in 
     subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880 
     of this title (article 80).''.
       (2) Clerical amendments.--
       (A) Section heading.--The heading of such section is 
     amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits''.

       (B) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is 
     amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and 
     inserting the following new item:

``856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.''.

       (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 
     856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) 
     of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by 
     subsection (a)(1), committed after that date.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Ohio (Mr. Turner) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  I want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Adam Smith for 
their efforts. They had given to Representative Tsongas and myself the 
task of doing a bipartisan package to address the issue of sexual 
assault in the military.
  We all know and people have spoken on this House floor eloquently of 
the tragedy of the issue of sexual assault in the military. We have to 
do something both to change the culture and to change the legislative 
regime that affects the prosecution and the prevention of sexual 
assault and the protection of victims.
  Many times victims report they are revictimized by the system. It is 
our effort in changing the system so that the perpetrator fears the 
system, not the victim.
  There is one other thing that we need to address. Mr. Chairman, many 
people have taken this House floor and say we need to go further. The 
Turner amendment is what we need to do to go further.
  We have put in this bill currently a mandatory minimum, meaning if 
you commit a sexual assault, you are subject to a statutory minimum. 
That minimum in this bill, unfortunately, is only that you're out of 
the military. We want to increase that to include 2 years of 
confinement.
  Mr. Chairman, 22 States have mandatory minimums that include 
confinement, incarceration. Of those 22 States, we took the minimum of 
those so that we're not going higher than any State.
  But here is the issue, Mr. Chairman, that we need to remedy: 
unfortunately, under current law, if you commit a sexual assault on a 
base that's in a State that has a mandatory minimum, you might actually 
avoid a mandatory minimum. That has happened.
  In the case of Marine Corps Gunnery Sergeant Nicholas Howard, he 
committed a rape on a 23-year-old woman. He was a recruiter in Alaska. 
He was convicted of sexual assault due to DNA testing, and he was found 
guilty of first degree sexual assault. He was given a dishonorable 
discharge but no jail time. In Alaska, he would have been subject to 
incarceration.
  Mr. Chairman, we should not have people who are in uniform or on base 
committing sexual assaults actually avoid jail time because they're in 
the military. We shouldn't have a lower standard.
  With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to Mrs. Walorski.
  Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to thank Representative Turner 
for giving me this opportunity to speak in favor of his amendment. He's 
been a leader on this issue, and I applaud his efforts and commitment 
to this cause.
  Currently, there's no minimum punishment required when someone is 
convicted of military sexual assault. This means a servicemember can be 
convicted of a serious crime and receive no punishment. The amendment 
will impose a mandatory minimum sentence of 2 years confinement and a 
dishonorable discharge for conviction of rape and sexual assault.
  Right now, 22 States have mandatory minimum sentences for those 
convicted of rape and sexual assault. My State, Indiana, is one of 
those States. In Indiana, there's a mandatory sentence of not less than 
6 years for rape.
  It's inexcusable that servicemembers guilty of the most heinous crime 
should be allowed to remain in the military, allowing them to coexist 
with victims and potentially commit repeated offenses. Criminals must 
receive the full weight of justice for their wrongdoings.
  America's sons and daughters deserve protection while serving in the 
military and should never feel vulnerable or revictimized after 
suffering from any form of sexual assault or misconduct. This amendment 
is a much-needed reform that ensures victims receive the justice they 
deserve.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I really respect the 
gentleman and what he's bringing forward, but the

[[Page 9055]]

reality is that mandatory minimums have been shown to actually reduce 
the incidence of reporting.
  Judges and juries need the ability to decide with discretion and not 
strictly by its appearance. Sometimes--and we've seen this many times--
mandatory minimums can have the opposite effect: encouraging jurors to 
make a decision based on the potential sentence as opposed to the 
facts.
  That's why I'm standing in opposition, because we also know that 
organizations who have worked very hard to look at this issue worry 
that this could go in the wrong direction. Protect our Defenders, which 
has been a very strong advocacy group for victims, worries that when a 
jury knows that a perpetrator will automatically be dishonorably 
discharged, that the jury will be less likely to assign confinement 
charges in addition. They need to see the full picture.
  So we must take caution to judge every case individually.
  As we have additional speakers, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. TURNER. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. I'm pleased to yield 3 minutes to the 
gentlewoman from Massachusetts (Ms. Tsongas).
  Ms. TSONGAS. Mr. Chairman, I value my partnership with Congressman 
Turner as cochairs of the Military Sexual Assault Prevention Caucus and 
with the legislation we have crafted on combating the horrific crime of 
sexual assault in the military.
  This year, our work together on the Better Enforcement for Sexual 
Assault Free Environments Act, otherwise known as BE SAFE, led to its 
incorporation into the NDAA before us today. However, I must take 
exception to the amendment before us.
  I do agree that we must make sure that all individuals who are 
convicted of sexual assault in the military are punished with 
confinement--absolutely--but there are many different ideas about the 
best way to do that. Some argue that a better approach would be a 
system similar to Federal sentencing guidelines, and that's why Mr. 
Turner and I wrote a provision in the defense authorization before us 
that requires the Secretary of Defense to provide Congress with a 
report on sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentencing 
provisions under the UCMJ.
  Before we make additional changes to the UCMJ, we need to see this 
report. Since we've introduced the BE SAFE Act, we have heard from many 
groups. One letter from the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence 
says:

       Long mandatory minimum sentences can have a chilling effect 
     on reporting and prosecuting sexual assault in the civilian 
     system, and the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence does 
     not recommend them.

  We have to listen to these various voices. We cannot afford to take 
this risk in the military. Reporting of sexual assault in the military 
already happens at abysmal rates. We need more reporting, not less. 
Less reporting equals fewer prosecutions, which ultimately will fail to 
deter the perpetrators from carrying out this heinous crime.
  I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment.

                              {time}  1550

  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Ohio has 2 minutes remaining.
  Mr. TURNER. Do I have the right to close, Mr. Chairman?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California has the right to 
close.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the concern that I have heard 
from the other side of the aisle. The issue, I think, comes down to 
being in a military uniform should not be a get-out-of-jail-free card. 
Basically the state of the law is that if you're in a State that has a 
mandatory minimum and you commit a sexual assault or a rape, you're 
going to jail. But yet under our law, you could be a member of the 
military and commit a sexual assault or rape and be free from 
incarceration even if you commit the assault or rape off base.
  When we talk about wanting to make certain that we uphold the victims 
and make certain that the perpetrator is the person who feels insecure 
and threatened by the system, you can't have a system that threatens 
the perpetrator when the perpetrator knows that being a man or woman in 
uniform or by being on base and a member of the military that you're 
subject to a lower standard in conviction and sentencing.
  The case we have in Alaska where a member of our military, a member 
of the Marine Corps, committed a rape and then received no jail time 
whatsoever--no jail time whatsoever--and if he had been off base or if 
he been a civilian in Alaska, he would have been subject to a 
significant mandatory minimum of incarceration.
  When people ask what's different in the military, this is different. 
We need a mandatory minimum that says if you commit a sexual assault 
and you're convicted, you are out of the military, you are dishonorably 
discharged, and you are going to jail. And that mandatory minimum will 
be at least 2 years of incarceration.
  I was just at a facility where I asked the commanders what had 
occurred on their facility with sexual assault, and they reported there 
had been a sexual assault and there was currently someone in jail, in 
the brig for 7 months. They didn't get a dishonorable discharge. That's 
all they got, 7 months. They were going to be out walking among their 
fellow men and women, and they will have committed a sexual assault. 
That has a chilling effect both on reporting, and it also creates an 
environment where people who are perpetrators feel they could be safe.
  Our law, this amendment, would make it: you're out, mandatory, 
dishonorable discharge, 2 years in prison, and that's it. We urge 
support for the Turner amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. I yield 1 minute to the gentlelady from 
California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez).
  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I thank the ranking 
member.
  I rise in opposition to this amendment. Congress is of course 
outraged over the ongoing cases of sexual assault and sexual harassment 
occurring in our military. There's no one in this Chamber who doesn't 
believe that criminals should pay for such violent and atrocious crime, 
and so I understand why my good colleague on the other side would offer 
such an amendment.
  I'll say several things. First, I'm pretty much opposed to mandatory 
minimum sentences in general. But this base bill, the base bill that 
we're considering today, the committee requires the Department of 
Defense to provide a report on mandatory minimums and sentencing 
guidelines in order to make sure that such sentencing reforms will not 
discourage the victims from reporting.
  And in addition to that, in the base bill, if you are convicted of 
these crimes, you will be dishonorably discharged. So in order to avoid 
imposing laws that may harm victims, I urge my colleagues to vote 
against this amendment.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of 
my time.
  This is a complex issue. We know that. I think what we feel is this 
further complicates it. I think my colleague has introduced with 
Congresswoman Tsongas a bill that does much of what we're talking about 
here, but there is an exception in terms of the way that the jury is 
able to move forward here. We think that this actually makes sense so 
that the decisions that are made are absolutely based on an individual 
case and what we can offer in terms of making certain that the 
perpetrator is held accountable.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner).
  The amendment was agreed to.


                 Amendment No. 9 Offered by Mr. Rigell

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 9 
printed in Part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.

[[Page 9056]]

  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of title III, insert the following:

     SEC. 352. MODIFICATION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF PUBLIC-
                   PRIVATE COMPETITIONS FOR CONVERSION OF 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR 
                   PERFORMANCE.

       (a) Modification.--Section 325 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 
     123 Stat. 2253) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary of Defense 
     submits to the congressional defense committees the 
     certification required under subsection (d)'' and inserting 
     ``Comptroller General submits to the congressional defense 
     committees the assessment required under subsection (c)''; 
     and
       (2) by striking subsection (d).
       (b) Exemption of Public-private Partnerships.--The 
     Secretary of Defense may exempt from study or competition 
     pursuant to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 
     those functions or workloads which are the subject of an 
     existing public-private partnership.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Virginia (Mr. Rigell) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Virginia.
  Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, these are very, very challenging fiscal 
times. Our deficit continues to grow, and that is putting pressure on 
every single line of our Federal budget, including defense. And yet the 
world has not become a safer place. So what's clear is we have a duty, 
an absolute duty, to invest each and every dollar of our defense 
dollars wisely, and that's exactly what my amendment does. It does that 
by eliminating a regulation that's holding back competition; and in 
doing so, it's hurting the American taxpayer.
  When it comes to understanding the value of introducing competition 
into things, the American people get it. From groceries to computers, 
we know when competition is introduced, good things happen. The prices 
go down and the quality goes up.
  The same is true, or it should be true, when it comes to the 
Department of Defense and the ability of the private sector and the 
public sector to compete. President Obama put it this way. He said:

       Taxpayers may receive more value for their dollars if not 
     inherently governmental activities that can be provided 
     commercially are subject to the forces of competition.

  In my service to my district, I'm always looking for commonsense 
ideas and common ground. On this particular issue, I see both in the 
President's statement.
  My amendment moves competition forward by eliminating a full 
moratorium that Congress has put in place. The Department of Defense 
said in 2011 that it wanted that particular moratorium removed so it 
could meet its statutory obligation. What is that statutory obligation? 
It's this, and this comes right out of their own report and 
recommendations:

       The Secretary of Defense shall use the least costly form of 
     personnel consistent with military requirements and other 
     needs of the Department.

  Well, we know that some activities are inherently governmental. For 
example, criminal investigations. My amendment has nothing to do with 
those types of activities. They should be performed by the Federal 
Government. But other activities, Mr. Chairman, for example, janitorial 
services, that's not inherently governmental and should be subject to 
competition. That's what this amendment opens up. It really isn't 
effecting what's known as the 50/50 rule and those core services that 
are provided by depots. I believe that the amendment represents both 
common sense and common ground. I urge my colleagues to vote for it.
  I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Coffman).
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, over the past few years, the prevailing 
trend within the Department of Defense has been an overreliance on 
Federal employees to perform commercial services. Given our Nation's 
need for fiscal austerity, a problem made more acute by mandated 
sequester cuts, it is important that Congress provide the Pentagon with 
the necessary tools to drive efficiencies and cost savings. Public-
private competitions are one such tool.
  Public-private competitions are an effective way of injecting 
performance and accountability into government operations. The private 
sector constantly competes for new business opportunities. When the 
Federal Government performs commercial functions, they, too, should be 
required to compete. Unfortunately, Congress has placed a moratorium on 
public-private cost competitions, effectively granting monopoly power 
to the Federal Government when it comes to providing commercially 
available goods and services. We all know that without competition, 
both innovation and quality suffer.
  The amendment does not mandate the use of public-private 
competitions. It simply unlocks an essential tool that the Defense 
Department can use to drive cost effectiveness and efficiencies, and 
save valuable taxpayer dollars.
  Mr. RIGELL. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition to 
the Rigell amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Hawaii is recognized for 5 
minutes.

                              {time}  1600

  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute.
  Mr. Chairman, the Rigell amendment would lift the current moratorium 
on the public-private competition to the A-76 process. Unfortunately, 
it is based on very faulty assumptions.
  Lifting the moratorium will eliminate the incentives the Department 
needs to fix the A-76 process, as well as finish the service contracts 
inventory. It's based on the following assumption, which has been 
proven to be faulty, that the private contractors, for some reason, 
save money; and we know from the program reports that that is not true.
  As DOD evaluates the correct balance between civilian and contractor 
personnel, it is critical to make sure that our Federal employees, the 
strength of our country, the backbone of defense, are protected. 
Efficient government requires focused attention on supporting and 
strengthening our dedicated Federal workforce and making sure that they 
have the tools they need to complete our mission.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  I just would respond to the gentlelady. I appreciate her comments. 
And I, too, am a strong supporter of our Federal workforce. I just 
believe that they can compete and should compete.
  This is good for America, good for our ability to defend our great 
country, and good for the American taxpayer.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Pennsylvania (Mr. Cartwright).
  Mr. CARTWRIGHT. Thank you, Representative Hanabusa.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment and in support 
of the over 5,000 men and women who work at the Tobyhanna Army Depot 
who support our warfighters.
  The OMB circular A-76 process, which this amendment seeks to 
reinstate, has been prohibited because it's unfair to Federal employees 
and wasteful of taxpayer dollars.
  The OMB and the Pentagon, who have historically been the biggest 
boosters of this process, both acknowledge that A-76 is flawed and they 
oppose its revival.
  The DOD acknowledges it's still improving its statutorily required 
improvements, and it would be rash for us to jump past their internal 
procedures for improvement.
  Lifting the moratorium would eliminate the incentives the Department 
needs to fix the A-76 process, and we would not be doing our jobs if we 
rushed to allow a flawed procedure to lay off our dedicated civilian 
workforce and, in many cases, hurt the taxpayers in the process.
  Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I just refuse to agree with the gentleman's 
proposition there about laying Federal employees off. This does not 
state that, has nothing to do with that, in fact. It just simply says 
that this is a tool for

[[Page 9057]]

the Department of Defense to use. It does not require public-private 
competitions to go forward.
  I just believe in the Federal worker. I believe in the free market as 
well, that competition is a good thing, and it needs to be introduced, 
because this is how we will make our defense dollars go as far as they 
can possibly go.
  I see this as a duty to the American people to advance this 
amendment. I ask my colleagues to support it.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Utah (Mr. Bishop).
  Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Mr. Chairman, even though I appreciate the 
efforts and the goals of the gentlemen who are introducing this 
amendment, the experience at most of our air logistics centers simply 
means that A-76 has brought along delays; and those delays, even if 
they're in the form of a study, have caused the work to delay, meaning 
the product given to the warfighter is delayed, and the fixed cost 
overhead that our depots obviously have faced have to be paid from some 
source, which is, indeed, the taxpayer.
  A-76 is about low cost and not necessarily best value, which means if 
you're dealing with a market system where something goes out there, you 
see if it sells or not, that's okay. But you're dealing with military 
equipment which must be performed and must be prepared on a timely 
basis and in a specific way. And that is why the Department of Defense 
and the Office of Management and Budget are both opposing this 
amendment, as well as why they halted the process in the first place, 
because they found there are structural flaws inherent in this process.
  It is better to go about finding a better solution to this, and that 
is public-private partnerships, which we are already doing at the air 
logistics centers. By taking the creativity of the private sector with 
the stability of the public workforce, we actually get the best of both 
worlds. That would be far better than tearing this open for a food 
fight that would affect the quality of military equipment which is at 
stake.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
North Carolina (Mr. Jones).
  Mr. JONES. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. We 
fought this issue of the A-76 several years ago in a bipartisan way and 
we were able to put it on the shelf for a period of time, and I think 
trying to activate it and bring it back is absolutely the wrong thing 
to do.
  I have Cherry Point Marine Air Station in my district. I have a depot 
there with over 4,000 workers. They pick up and go overseas and fight 
these wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, leave their families back home, and 
stand right there with the warfighter.
  We need to kill this amendment because it is opposed by the OMB, by 
the DOD, and there is no reason to reactivate the A-76. It should be 
dead and buried.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Utah (Mr. Stewart).
  Mr. STEWART. Mr. Chairman, I had the honor of serving as a B-1 pilot 
in the United States Air Force for 14 years. My last assignment was 
working as a liaison between the Air Force and a multitude of private 
contractors. And because of this, I saw firsthand the struggles that 
the military had in successfully implementing A-76 contract 
requirements. I saw it lead to a slowdown in work that was being 
performed and, in some cases, actual complete work stoppage.
  As a conservative, and I want to be clear on this, I have always 
supported free markets and open competition. But markets can only be 
free when there's a level playing field, and that is not possible under 
the current rules regarding A-76 contracting.
  Neither the military nor the private contractors are well-served by a 
flawed process that leads to a flawed result, which is the reason why 
the Department of Defense has spoken out so strongly against this 
amendment.
  The Department appreciates the value of A-76 public-private 
competition as a tool to help the Department's workforce, and I do as 
well. However, the Department has also identified a number of 
improvements in policy changes that could lead to implementation before 
the moratorium is removed. The Department is working hard to put these 
processes in place. Let's give them a little more time to do that.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Chairman, it is faulty to assume, when the Department of Defense 
has not resolved longstanding problems in the A-76 process that have 
been identified by the GAO and the DOD, that this is the way to 
proceed. We must keep that moratorium on until we are certain that, in 
fact, this is in the best interest of the people of our great Nation.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. LOEBSACK. Mr. Chair, I rise today in strong opposition to this 
amendment.
  The current moratorium on the use of A-76 competitions was put in 
place under President Bush after the Department of Defense Inspector 
General and the non-partisan GAO found significant flaws with the A-76 
process, including that the costs of A-76 competitions often exceeded 
the estimated savings. Those flaws have not been fixed.
  Put simply--lifting the moratorium on A-76 would not save taxpayer 
dollars, would not be in the best interest of our military readiness, 
and is not supported by the Department of Defense.
  In fact, the Department of Defense opposes lifting this moratorium 
until the significant problems with these competitions are addressed.
  Moreover, as co-chair of the Depot Caucus, I appreciate that this 
amendment would exempt public-private partnerships but I'm deeply 
concerned that lifting the A-76 moratorium and putting back into place 
a severely flawed system would do significant damage to our organic 
industrial base, including our arsenals and depots, at a time when it 
is critical that we maintain these facilities' capabilities to equip 
our troops.
  I proudly represent Rock Island Arsenal, where thousands of highly 
skilled people work every day to equip our troops. Our organic 
industrial base has time and again shown their critical importance to 
our men and women in uniform. When our troops on the ground needed 
improved armor on their vehicles, it was Rock Island Arsenal that was 
able to rapidly produce and field that life-saving armor to protect our 
troops. As a military parent, I am thankful that the workforce at Rock 
Island Arsenal and in organic industrial base facilities across our 
country is there to equip our men and women in uniform.
  In addition, I strongly support public-private partnerships between 
our organic industrial base and the private sector because they 
leverage the skills and capabilities from both sectors to equip our 
troops and improve our national security readiness while benefiting the 
taxpayer and supporting the highly skilled workforce at our arsenals 
and depots.
  Conversely, A-76 competitions do not produce best value for the 
Department of Defense and our service men and women.
  The deeply flawed A-76 process should not be reinstated and I 
strongly oppose lifting the moratorium.
  For these reasons, I oppose this amendment and urge my colleagues to 
join me in voting against it.
  Mr. O'ROURKE. Mr. Chair, the Federal Government is facing some of the 
most complex challenges in our Nation's history and dealing with 
serious budget constraints. In order to do more with less, it is 
critical that we have a first class Federal workforce. The government 
must make the proper investments in its employees and take the steps 
necessary to recruit, retain, and develop its talent.
  The media often focuses on what goes wrong in government, but today I 
want to take a moment to recognize the important work of the more than 
800,000 Department of Defense (DoD) civil servants who provide 
essential services to help keep our country safe. DoD civilians are 
partners in our national defense and integral to the success of DoD 
military operations.
  I represent Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas and to echo the words of 
Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta when he visited the 
installation, ``let me be clear--Fort Bliss is the premier post in 
America.'' The critical role this post plays in our national defense is 
supported by more than 11,000 full-time civilian employees. We live in 
a world where the threats to our freedoms are diverse and we must 
ensure that our civilian workforce is up to the task of protecting the 
American people. To succeed in carrying out the complex tasks of the 
Department, Congress must enable all these employees to excel in their 
jobs. We must compensate them commensurate with their responsibilities; 
provide them with a quality of

[[Page 9058]]

work life that fosters long-term growth; and work to ensure that labor-
management relationships remain strong.
  This year Congress debated multiple amendments to the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 that aimed to weaken the 
civilian workforce at DoD. These amendments would greatly expand the A-
76 process and direct the Department to contract out any function not 
considered to be ``inherently governmental''--regardless of policy, 
risk, or cost to DoD. The Congress outlawed the use of the A-76 process 
during the Bush Administration after the finding by DoD Inspector 
General that it was biased against federal employees, and by the 
Government Accountability Office that the costs of associated with the 
process often exceeded estimated savings. Additionally, in testimony 
before the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, DoD Comptroller 
Robert Hale acknowledged that contractors are twice as expensive as 
civilian employees stating that ``if you're going to have a job over a 
long period of time . . . it's probably cheaper to have a civilian 
government employee to do it.'' For these reasons, I voted against 
these amendments.
  As the Nation's largest employer, I believe that the federal 
government has a responsibility to lead by example to be a model 
employer. This is especially true for the Department of Defense. Since 
being elected to Congress, I have met and worked with many civilian 
employees at DoD and am inspired by their dedication. Our military and 
country are stronger because of them, and I will continue to support 
efforts that strengthen our federal workforce.
  The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Simpson). The question is on the amendment 
offered by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Rigell).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. RIGELL. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia 
will be postponed.


                Amendment No. 10 Offered by Mr. McGovern

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 10 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Strike section 1222 and insert the following:

     SEC. 1222. COMPLETION OF ACCELERATED TRANSITION OF UNITED 
                   STATES COMBAT AND MILITARY AND SECURITY 
                   OPERATIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AFGHANISTAN.

       (a) In General.--It is the policy of the United States 
     that, in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, 
     North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries, 
     and other allies in Afghanistan, the President shall--
       (1) complete the accelerated transition of United States 
     combat operations to the Government of Afghanistan by not 
     later than December 31, 2013;
       (2) complete the accelerated transition of United States 
     military and security operations to the Government of 
     Afghanistan and redeploy United States Armed Forces from 
     Afghanistan (including operations involving military and 
     security-related contractors) by not later than December 31, 
     2014; and
       (3) pursue robust negotiations leading to a political 
     settlement and reconciliation of the internal conflict in 
     Afghanistan, to include the Government of Afghanistan, all 
     interested parties within Afghanistan and with the observance 
     and support of representatives of donor nations active in 
     Afghanistan and regional governments and partners in order to 
     secure a secure and independent Afghanistan and regional 
     security and stability.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     should the President determine the necessity to maintain 
     United States troops in Afghanistan to carry out missions 
     after December 31, 2014, and such presence and missions 
     should be authorized by a separate vote of Congress not later 
     than June 1, 2014.
       (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the 
     President to--
       (1) modify the military strategy, tactics, and operations 
     of United States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces redeploy 
     from Afghanistan;
       (2) attack Al Qaeda forces wherever such forces are 
     located;
       (3) provide financial support and equipment to the 
     Government of Afghanistan for the training and supply of 
     Afghanistan military and security forces; or
       (4) gather, provide, and share intelligence with United 
     States allies operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) and a Member opposed each will 
control 5 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Massachusetts.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute.
  Mr. Chairman, the war in Afghanistan has gone on for more than 12 
years, the longest war in American history. 2,235 U.S. military 
personnel have been killed, over 17,000 have been wounded, and more 
will fall before our troops finally come home. The human and financial 
costs are staggering; $778 billion on Operation Enduring Freedom, 
nearly all of that in Afghanistan, $7.2 billion each and every month.
  The President has announced and is implementing a timetable to wind 
down U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. He's carrying it out.
  This amendment requires the President to stick to his timetable, 
accelerate it if he can. And depending on your point of view, this 
amendment puts the wind at the President's back, or holds his feet to 
the fire, to fulfill the promises he made to our brave troops, their 
families, and the American people.
  More importantly, it expresses that should U.S. troops be asked to 
remain in Afghanistan beyond 2014, then Congress needs to take its 
constitutional responsibility seriously and hold a specific vote to 
authorize that mission and troop presence.
  The future and fate of tens of thousands of uniformed men and women 
deserve a vote. I ask all my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to 
vote ``yes'' on the McGovern-Jones-Smith-Lee-Garamendi amendment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1610

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition, 
although I will not oppose the amendment in its current form.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  This amendment is a reflection of the President's current policy in 
Afghanistan. My concerns about the President's Afghanistan policy are 
well documented. I do not believe we should have given our enemies the 
comfort of a date certain for our withdrawal. I believe the commander 
in chief should only commit our troops to combat if he is committed to 
getting the job done right.
  Notwithstanding my underlying concerns, I must acknowledge the 
amendment articulates a policy that reflects the President's current 
policy.
  I look forward to working with the sponsors of this amendment to 
further perfect the language going forward. In particular, I note that 
the amendment expresses the sense of Congress that a post-2014 troop 
presence should be authorized by a vote in Congress. This Congressman 
does not agree with that assertion. The Congress does not vote on 
Status of Forces Agreements with other countries. They are not defense 
treaties. It would be bad policy and a bad precedent to treat 
Afghanistan any differently. Moreover, the underlying bill takes 
meaningful steps to ensure any Bilateral Security Agreement with 
Afghanistan protects U.S. interests and our troops' ability to defend 
themselves.
  This is not a trivial issue. Our vital national security interests 
are at stake during this delicate time period in Afghanistan. My 
position is unchanged. The transition of the mission should be based 
upon the conditions on the ground and the input of our commanders. I, 
for one, hope that the President's decisionmaking process is not based 
on a non-binding restatement of his current policies. Rather, I hope 
his decisionmaking is commensurate with the national security interests 
at stake.
  I look forward to working with the gentleman further and reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, at this time, it's my pleasure to yield 
1\1/2\

[[Page 9059]]

minutes to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Jones), a cosponsor.
  Mr. JONES. Mr. Chairman, it's been said before, we have been in 
Afghanistan for 12 years. We in Congress should have the opportunity to 
vote ``yes'' or ``no'' on any commitment of troops after 2014.
  As a former Commandant of the United States Marine Corps who agrees 
with my opinion that we should withdraw our troops from Afghanistan 
said to me, and I quote the Commandant:

       What do we say to the mother and father--to the wife--of 
     the last marine or soldier killed to support a corrupt 
     government and a corrupt leader in a war that cannot be won?

  Mr. Chairman, Congress has neglected this war for far too long. We 
should not allow another American to die in Afghanistan unless we vote 
on the policy.
  The American people want our troops out. The American people know 
that Afghanistan is a failed policy. The American people do not want 
any more blood or any more treasure to be spent in Afghanistan.
  I join my friend from Massachusetts and my other friends: please vote 
for this amendment offered by Mr. McGovern, myself, and others. It is 
the right thing to do for our military, it's the right thing to do for 
our Nation, and it is our constitutional responsibility.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I'm privileged to now yield 1\1/2\ 
minutes to the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, Mr. 
Smith.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts for 
his leadership on this issue.
  My opinion is that we have done what we can do in Afghanistan. A 
substantial portion of the mission, which was very clear, was to try to 
contain the Taliban and contain al Qaeda so they could never again use 
it as a base to attack our country. And it is not easy work. As Mr. 
Jones pointed out, and others, there are many, many problems and 
challenges in Afghanistan, not the least of which is the corruption 
within the government.
  Our goal has always been clear: whatever the minimum is to get a 
government that can stand and deny a safe haven to those who threaten 
America. That was a fight worth doing. But we have done what we can do. 
We have trained hundreds of thousands of Afghan national security 
forces, and it is time to turn that responsibility over to Afghanistan.
  It will always be a challenging part of the world. In both 
Afghanistan and Pakistan, violent extremists are abundant, and we'll 
have to keep an eye on it. But we do not need to have the troop levels 
that we have now. We need to draw down in a very responsible way, and I 
think the gentleman's amendment lays out a plan to do that.
  Therefore, I support it, and, again, I support him for his efforts to 
get us out of Afghanistan as soon as we responsibly can.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, how much time remains?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 1\3/4\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. McGOVERN. I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from California 
(Mr. Rohrabacher).
  Mr. ROHRABACHER. Keeping our troops in Afghanistan any longer than 
they have to absolutely be there is a disservice to those people who 
are protecting our country. They are now doing what we said they would 
do once we have announced that we were leaving: they're picking our 
people off. How do we explain to those parents who are losing their 
children in the next few months?
  Let's not send any more over there, and if we do, let's make sure 
that it's a decision made by the House of the people rather than just 
by a clique someplace in the Pentagon or elsewhere. We need to make 
sure that we're watching out for our troops, and I think that this is 
the best amendment that would do just that.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I will close. I yield myself the 
remaining time.
  Mr. Chairman, hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of thousands 
of U.S.-NATO allies and Afghan lives have been lost. It is time to end 
the war in Afghanistan, bring our troops home, and take seriously our 
duty as a Congress to specifically authorize any mission and troop 
presence beyond 2014.
  We are not bystanders in this war. We are responsible for sending 
thousands and thousands of men and women over into Afghanistan. The 
least we can do is take seriously our duty as a Congress and authorize 
any mission and troop presence beyond 2014.
  Members of Congress ought to go on record as to where they stand on 
this. We owe it to our troops, and we owe it to their families and the 
American people. I urge my colleagues to support the McGovern-Jones-
Smith amendment on Afghanistan and send a signal to the administration 
and to others that we take our responsibility in this matter very 
seriously. We will have a vote if this war goes beyond what the 
President has stated.
  With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield the balance of my 
time to the gentleman from Texas, the vice chairman of the committee, 
Mr. Thornberry.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. I thank the chairman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, I would simply want to point out that Members have a 
variety of opinions about Afghanistan, and a number of Members have 
come to the floor to voice their opinion that we ought to leave 
Afghanistan. I understand that. That's not what this amendment says. 
This amendment basically restates the President's policy with regard to 
Afghanistan, and then, as the gentleman from Massachusetts said, it 
says Congress ought to exercise its responsibilities under the 
Constitution.
  Now, we can do that in a variety of ways. We can have oversight 
hearings, and we can have amendments dealing with funding. And we've 
had those sorts of things before. But the point is that some of the 
rhetoric doesn't match the amendment. As the chairman pointed out, the 
underlying bill tries to encourage a Bilateral Security Agreement so 
that looking ahead beyond 2014, it is very important to many of us that 
any American troops who are remaining in Afghanistan have the 
protections that they should have under such an agreement. So the 
underlying bill has a fence on some of the funding going to Afghanistan 
until there is that sort of Bilateral Security Agreement.
  So the point is, moving ahead beyond 2014, there are lots of unknowns 
at this stage. We're trying to help shape it in a way that is 
beneficial for our security but also protects our troops. But the 
underlying amendment, to get back to what's before us, basically 
restates the President's position and says that Congress ought to 
exercise its responsibilities. I think that's true. Meanwhile, Members 
can have their own opinions about Afghanistan and what should happen 
between now and then.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from 
Massachusetts will be postponed.


               Amendment No. 11 Offered by Mr. Goodlatte

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 11 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I offer amendment No. 11.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle D of title X, add the following:

     SEC. 10__. PROCEDURES GOVERNING UNITED STATES CITIZENS 
                   APPREHENDED INSIDE THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT 
                   TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

       (a) Availability of Writ of Habeas Corpus.--Nothing in the 
     Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 
     50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any other law, shall be

[[Page 9060]]

     construed to deny the availability of the writ of habeas 
     corpus to any United States citizen apprehended inside the 
     United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of 
     Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
       (b) Procedures.--In any habeas proceeding brought by a 
     United States citizen apprehended inside the United States 
     pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force 
     (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), the government 
     shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing 
     evidence that such citizen is an unprivileged enemy 
     belligerent and there shall be no presumption that any 
     evidence presented by the government as justification for the 
     apprehension and subsequent detention is accurate and 
     authentic.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Virginia.

                              {time}  1620

  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  On September 18, 2001, Congress enacted the Authorization for the Use 
of Military Force, which empowered the President to ``use all necessary 
and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons 
he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist 
attacks,'' in order to prevent ``any future acts of international 
terrorism against the United States.''
  Section 1021 of the fiscal year 2012 National Defense Authorization 
Act reaffirms the President's authority to detain so-called ``enemy 
combatants'' by ``affirming that the authority of the President to use 
all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for 
Use of Military Force includes the authority for the Armed Forces of 
the United States to detain covered persons pending disposition under 
the law of war.''
  A number of Members from both sides of the aisle have expressed 
extreme discomfort and even outrage at the notion that a United States 
citizen apprehended on United States soil can potentially be held 
indefinitely under this act. To that end, I supported an amendment to 
the fiscal year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act that reaffirmed 
the availability of the writ of habeas corpus for any person detained 
in the United States pursuant to the 2001 AUMF or the fiscal year 2012 
NDAA.
  While this provision was a step in the right direction, many would 
view the current habeas proceedings as unfair to the petitioner. For 
instance, the government enjoys a rebuttable presumption that its 
evidence is accurate and authentic, and it must only prove its case by 
a preponderance of the evidence. To most Americans, this would not seem 
to be a fair fight. For United States citizens, the burden should be on 
the government to prove that the detainee is an enemy belligerent. U.S. 
citizens should not be put in a position to prove that they are not a 
terrorist.
  Today, with this amendment, I want to make clear that nothing in the 
AUMF or the fiscal year 2012 NDAA--or any other law for that matter--
can be construed to deny the great writ of habeas corpus.
  Further, this amendment requires that in habeas proceedings for 
United States citizens apprehended in the United States pursuant to the 
AUMF, the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that 
the citizen is an unprivileged enemy combatant, and there is no 
presumption that the government's evidence is accurate and authentic.
  This is an important amendment that should alleviate any of the well-
founded concerns of the American people concerning the possibility of 
indefinite detention of United States citizens. The presumption of 
innocence until proven guilty will be preserved by adopting this 
amendment.
  I want to thank the chairman of the Armed Services Committee for 
supporting this amendment. I appreciate his commitment to ensuring that 
this language stays in the bill as it moves through the legislative 
process.
  I urge my colleagues to support this amendment, and I reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I rise to claim the time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself 2 minutes.
  Mr. Chairman, make no mistake about it, even with this amendment, the 
President of the United States and the Department of Justice will still 
have the ability to indefinitely detain people captured in the U.S.--be 
they U.S. citizens or not--without the normal due process of law. 
Habeas will be available, but even with this increased standard, it is 
a very minimum standard; and it does not afford the normal article III 
court rights that are in the Constitution for everybody else. The 
President will still have the ability to indefinitely detain people 
here in the U.S.
  This amendment is insufficient, first of all, to deal with the 
concerns that I think people legitimately have about excessive 
executive power over people in the U.S. The Executive will continue to 
maintain, under the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, the 
ability to indefinitely detain anyone who is deemed to be a covered 
person, an enemy combatant; and, yes, it is a slightly higher standard, 
but it is not the beyond-a-reasonable standard that is normally 
required to incarcerate somebody.
  The President doesn't need this power. President Obama has never 
exercised it. President Bush only briefly exercised it in three 
instances. He doesn't need the power. But to keep it on the books is a 
threat to liberty and a threat to freedom here in the U.S.
  The specific problem with this amendment is it carves out U.S. 
citizens, whereas the constitutional protections--and deliberately--
were for any person. If you read the Constitution and the Bill of 
Rights, it doesn't say any U.S. citizen. It says any person.
  Now, on habeas, you will have two different standards. You will have 
the standard to hold a noncitizen--which will be, I gather, still the 
preponderance of the evidence. The government will still have the 
presumption that what they're saying is true, but for a U.S. citizen 
you will have a different standard. That really messes with the 
Constitution.
  There's a very simple way to do this. I will have an amendment in a 
couple of amendments that gets rid of the ability to indefinitely 
detain anyone captured in the U.S.--straight forward, no question, no 
weasel words, no back and forth between U.S. citizens and not. It gets 
rid of indefinite detention.
  I would urge support for that amendment and opposition to this one, 
and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute. I want to 
respond to the gentleman.
  First of all, the contention that there is no distinction drawn 
between United States citizens and noncitizens in the context of the 
Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court 
has held that the Fourth Amendment does not operate to protect all 
citizens regardless of their
connections to American society. So the 9/11 hijackers are not in the 
same status as individuals in this country who are citizens of the 
United States. Rather, the Fourth Amendment operates only to protect 
the class of persons who are part of a national community or who have 
otherwise developed sufficient connection with this country to be 
considered part of that community. The farther that an individual is 
removed from such community, then the weaker the claim he has to 
constitutional protection.
  I agree with the gentleman that rewriting the Authorization for Use 
of Military Force and extending this protection, particularly as it 
pertains to the United States citizens, greater should be done; but 
what the gentleman wants to do does not have the kind of strong 
bipartisan support that's necessary to pass the House. This amendment 
does, and I urge my colleagues to support it.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler).
  Mr. NADLER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment. Mr.

[[Page 9061]]

Goodlatte and Chairman Smith and I are in agreement, I think, on the 
goal, though I think the three of us mutually disagree on elements of 
this amendment.
  The amendment, while intended to enhance protections for U.S. 
citizens, in fact does the opposite. Right now, Americans on U.S. soil 
cannot be detained indefinitely without charge or trial. Rather than 
affirming this fundamental principle, the amendment implicitly 
authorizes the military to detain Americans on U.S. soil indefinitely 
by premising its protection on the mistaken assertion that the AUMF, 
the Authorization for Military Force, allows such detention--which I 
disagree with Chairman Smith, it does not. No such authority exists.
  The AUMF does not grant this authority, and we should do nothing to 
suggest otherwise. In fact, we should be taking clear and immediate 
steps to ban indefinite military detention altogether. The Smith-Gibson 
amendment, which I support, takes a good first step in doing this by 
prohibiting the detention without charge of any person arrested or 
detained in the United States.
  We should also pass my No Detention Without Charge Act, which would 
cure the problem altogether by preventing indefinite detention without 
charge or trial for all persons in U.S. custody, at home or overseas.
  Secondly, this amendment would create greater uncertainty in habeas 
corpus cases and raises significant constitutional concerns. The 
amendment seeks to raise the burden on the U.S. Government to prove 
that a U.S. citizen is an unprivileged enemy belligerent. But that is 
not the same as requiring proof that the person is being lawfully 
detained, which is what habeas corpus is designed to do.
  The creation of a two-tiered habeas system with one set of standards 
for U.S. citizens and different, lesser standards for noncitizens 
raises very troubling constitutional concerns. Our Constitution simply 
does not permit us to permit greater basic due process rights based 
solely on citizenship.
  Although the chairman, Mr. Goodlatte, is right in citing the case 
that he cited, he talked about connection with the United States. 
Someone who is in the United States--physically in the United States--
and is arrested there has the same constitutional Fourth Amendment 
protections as an American citizen.
  Any changes to habeas protections should be studied carefully through 
regular order, not through rushed attachments to the defense 
authorization act. Passing this amendment would be a serious and 
dangerous mistake. I urge my colleagues to vote against it.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, may I ask how much time each side has 
remaining.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Virginia has 1 minute remaining. 
The gentleman from Washington has 1 minute remaining.
  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time to 
say to the gentleman from New York, you cause the Members of the 
Congress to have a Hobson's choice of having to choose to give the 
protection to every single person in the United States--including the 
9/11 hijackers and others--or you have the opportunity to choose to 
give it clearly to United States citizens who clearly are entitled to 
have it.
  You do not have the ability, with your amendment, to draw that line 
between those who are lawfully present in the United States and would 
be entitled, and those who do not. As a result of that, I would urge my 
colleagues to oppose the amendment that the gentleman describes and 
support this amendment, which will advance the cause of giving United 
States citizens greater protections, reversing the burden of proof, 
putting that burden on the government--which is, after all, the 
American way. It is, after all, what the Bill of Rights provides.
  You have to show that in order to convict a United States citizen in 
our courts--or certainly in an article III court--and it should be in 
these military tribunals--the burden of proof on government to do that 
and do it by a higher standard than they have to under the law that 
exists right now in the AUMF, which is only reasonable proof, not clear 
and convincing as this amendment requires.
  I urge my colleagues to support this amendment as the best way to 
move forward in protecting the rights of American citizens.
  I yield back the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1630

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time 
to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews).
  Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Chairman, I share with the author of this amendment 
the goal of clarifying and strengthening the time-honored writ of 
habeas corpus for all American citizens. But my concern is that 
sometimes by omission we limit people's rights.
  This amendment is very carefully, but narrowly, drawn in such a way 
it begs questions about the exclusion of those outside the ambit of 
this amendment and their rights. The gentleman, I know in good faith, 
is trying to promulgate an amendment that broadens the right of the 
writ of habeas corpus. But I think when compared with the Smith-Gibson 
language that this modifies, that it raises by omission an intention of 
the Congress to narrow the right of habeas corpus. So although it is 
not the gentleman's intent, I believe it is the effect of this 
amendment.
  Those who believe that the right of habeas should be strengthened and 
broadened, I believe should oppose this amendment and support the 
underlying language as I, in fact, do.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington 
will be postponed.


                 Amendment No. 12 Offered by Mr. Radel

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 12 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. RADEL. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 442, after line 9, insert the following:

     SEC. 1080. REPORT ON UNITED STATES CITIZENS SUBJECT TO 
                   MILITARY DETENTION.

       (a) Report Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to Congress an annual report on United States citizens 
     subject to military detention. Such report shall include, for 
     the period covered by the report, each of the following:
       (1) The name of each United States citizen subject to 
     military detention during such period.
       (2) The legal justification for such detention of such 
     citizen.
       (3) The steps taken to provide judicial process for or to 
     release each such citizen.
       (b) Form of Report.--The report required by subsection (a) 
     shall be in unclassified form but may contain a classified 
     annex.
       (c) Availability of Report.--The report submitted under 
     subsection (a) shall be made available to all members of 
     Congress.
       (d) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed to authorize or express approval for subjecting 
     United States citizens to military detention.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Florida (Mr. Radel) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.
  Mr. RADEL. Mr. Chairman, for too long, and at the hands of both 
parties, the White House has been operating with secret memos and 
behind closed doors hidden from you. This is why we are offering this 
amendment requiring the Department of Defense to submit an annual 
report to Congress which basically goes over who, why, and what.
  Who? The names of any U.S. citizens subject to military detention.
  Why? The legal justification for their detention.
  What? The steps the executive branch is taking to either provide them 
some sort of judicial process or the path of possible release.
  Now, this amendment requires that an unclassified version of the 
report be

[[Page 9062]]

made available to every Member of Congress. This amendment shines light 
where there has been darkness in this country, ensuring freedom, 
liberty, and justice for all.
  While there is a legitimate need that we recognize that the 
government protects us from terrorism, we almost always must ensure--we 
must ensure--that Americans' rights to their due process and their day 
in court are always, always protected. You need to be guaranteed that 
your government is looking out for your rights.
  Upon our founding, every American was guaranteed fundamental God-
given rights that cannot be taken away by the government. These 
amendments ensure that these rights are safeguarded.
  I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Arizona 
(Mr. Salmon).
  Mr. SALMON. Mr. Chairman, this little document here, the Constitution 
of the United States, is something that we all cherish, something when 
we were all sworn in we raised our right arm to the square and we said 
that we would uphold this document. It is the framework this Nation is 
built upon. There are certain unalienable rights that are created in 
that document that we just can't waive away.
  Some concerns about these rights are embedded in this bill. I have 
real concerns about American citizens being detained for an unspecified 
amount of time. I believe that this amendment goes a long way toward 
shedding the light, the light of transparency, on how these American 
citizens are handled. I think that's the very least that we can do as a 
body to make sure that our people's fundamental rights of freedom are 
protected.
  One of the great leaders and Founding Fathers of this Nation, 
Benjamin Franklin, once said:

       Those who are willing to trade their freedom for security 
     deserve neither and shall probably lose both.

  Mr. RADEL. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.


                         Parliamentary Inquiry

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I have a parliamentary 
inquiry.
  The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman will state it.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. This has happened a couple of times.
  Isn't it the normal order that one person speaks, then they reserve, 
and then the opposition speaks? A couple of times they just moved on to 
their next speaker and have gone through. As I understand it 
parliamentarily, that is not the way it is supposed to happen.
  The ACTING CHAIR. That is the normal pattern of alternation, but 
recognition is within the discretion of the Chair.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. At the discretion of the Chair. That's fine.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition, even though I 
am not in opposition to the amendment.
  The ACTING CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman is recognized for 
5 minutes.
  There was no objection.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the opportunity 
to speak. I think it is very straightforward. Certainly we should 
acknowledge and have this bit of information made available to us, and 
I don't oppose that.
  I just want to take the time to raise the issue of the next 
amendment--the Smith-Gibson amendment--that's coming up on this whole 
broader issue. This is a very simple, straightforward debate, that is, 
the militarization of U.S. law enforcement.
  That's really what we're concerned about with indefinite detention. 
There are some who believe that any terrorist act committed within the 
U.S., that the U.S. military should basically take over. You should 
have indefinite detention; you should basically get rid of the normal 
due process contained in the Constitution.
  I think that is dangerous, wrong, and wholly unnecessary. I think the 
U.S. Constitution and the Department of Justice have proven themselves 
more than capable of investigating, capturing, prosecuting, trying, 
convicting, and incarcerating all the terrorists in the U.S.; and I 
think it is a dangerous step towards executive and military power to 
allow things like indefinite detention under military control within 
the U.S.
  That's the heart and the essence of this issue. We are dancing around 
the U.S. citizen question. I take Mr. Goodlatte at his word. I believe 
that the Constitution doesn't apply to everybody, but it doesn't just 
apply to U.S. citizens either, as he acknowledged. It applies to U.S. 
persons, broadly speaking, people who have a connection to this 
country. We shouldn't just protect U.S. citizens; we should protect 
U.S. persons under that constitutional definition.
  In a very straightforward way, do you believe the President of the 
United States should have the power to indefinitely detain people 
captured within the U.S. without the normal due process of law? I 
don't, and honestly I don't think most Americans do, and I don't think 
most Members of Congress do. We have gotten bogged down in different 
little subpieces of the debate and U.S. citizens and who counts and who 
doesn't count.
  But the fundamental question is, Do you believe that the President 
should have the power to indefinitely detain people captured in the 
U.S. without normal due process of law? If you don't, if you are 
concerned about that executive power, then the only way to take that 
out of our law is to vote for Smith-Gibson. The rest of this just sort 
of moves it around on the edges, but very clearly leaves that power 
with the President, a power I don't think that he should have.
  With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Radel).
  The amendment was agreed to.


          Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Smith of Washington

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 13 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:
       Page 405, after line 9, insert the following:

     SEC. 1040B. DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED IN THE 
                   UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR 
                   USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

       (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Due 
     Process and Military Detention Amendments Act''.
       (b) Disposition.--Section 1021 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 
     125 Stat. 1562; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``The disposition'' and 
     inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (g), the 
     disposition''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
       ``(g) Disposition of Persons Detained in the United 
     States.--
       ``(1) Persons detained pursuant to the authorization for 
     use of military force or the fiscal year 2012 national 
     defense authorization act.--In the case of a covered person 
     who is detained in the United States, or a territory or 
     possession of the United States, pursuant to the 
     Authorization for Use of Military Force or this Act, 
     disposition under the law of war shall occur immediately upon 
     the person coming into custody of the Federal Government and 
     shall only mean the immediate transfer of the person for 
     trial and proceedings by a court established under Article 
     III of the Constitution of the United States or by an 
     appropriate State court. Such trial and proceedings shall 
     have all the due process as provided for under the 
     Constitution of the United States.
       ``(2) Prohibition on transfer to military custody.--No 
     person detained, captured, or arrested in the United States, 
     or a territory or possession of the United States, may be 
     transferred to the custody of the Armed Forces for detention 
     under the Authorization for Use of Military Force or this 
     Act.
       ``(h) Rule of Construction.--This section shall not be 
     construed to authorize the detention of a person within the 
     United States, or a territory or possession of the United 
     States, under the Authorization for Use of Military Force or 
     this Act.''.
       (c) Repeal of Requirement for Military Custody.--
       (1) Repeal.--Section 1022 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is hereby repealed.
       (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 1029(b) of such Act is 
     amended by striking ``applies to'' and all that follows 
     through ``any other person'' and inserting ``applies to any 
     person''.


[[Page 9063]]


  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Washington (Mr. Smith) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Washington.

                              {time}  1640

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler).
  Mr. NADLER. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  I rise in strong support of the Smith-Gibson amendment.
  When we considered the fiscal year 2012 version of this bill, I 
argued in opposition to sections 1021 and 1022. I argued then--and I 
still believe now--that these provisions go far beyond the AUMF to 
suggest that the President has the authority to detain even U.S. 
citizens without charge indefinitely. The AUMF gives the President no 
such authority.
  Clearly, we must roll back these provisions. The Smith-Gibson 
amendment prohibits the detention without charge of any person arrested 
or detained in the United States, and it is the first step towards 
restoring the due process of law. It is a good first step, but the 
scope is limited to U.S. soil and to the present AUMF. We should do 
more.
  That's why I've introduced the No Detention Without Charge Act, which 
would apply to all persons in U.S. custody--at home and overseas--and 
to all Authorizations to Use Military Force--present and future. It not 
only prohibits detention without charge of people arrested in the 
United States, but it also prohibits the detention of any person 
anywhere, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution and the 
law of war, and it restores a meaningful right of action for detainees 
to challenge the legality of the detentions.
  The notion that the United States ought to conduct itself according 
to the Constitution and the law of war should not be controversial. 
Smith-Gibson takes the first step, and I have proposed the next, which 
is towards affirming our values and securing our liberty. This 
clarifies that the AUMF does not give any President the authority to 
detain people without the due process of law and to detain them 
indefinitely.
  I urge my colleagues to support this amendment and to sign on as 
cosponsors of my bill but to, right now, support the Smith-Gibson 
amendment.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I rise to claim the time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and 
colleague, the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. McCaul).
  Mr. McCAUL. I thank the gentleman from California, my fellow 
chairman.
  I rise in opposition to this amendment. As the terrorist attacks in 
Benghazi and Boston demonstrate, our fight against those who mean us 
harm and those they inspire is far from over.
  This amendment is of questionable constitutional standing as it seeks 
to deprive any President of lawful options that he needs to protect 
America; it hinders our ability to gather information; and it actually 
provides an incentive for terrorists to come here to attack us. It 
prohibits the President from ever detaining anyone in the United 
States, including a foreign terrorist, under the authority of the 2001 
Authorization for Use of Military Force.
  This amendment requires that foreign terrorists could only be 
prosecuted in civilian courts. But what if they could not be 
successfully prosecuted? Currently, there are detainees in Guantanamo 
who are too dangerous to release but who are not prosecutable. Under 
this amendment, if similarly situated terrorists were captured here at 
home, they would have to be released. Our experience in trying to 
deport illegal aliens whose native lands refuse to accept their return 
demonstrates the untenable position this amendment would leave us in.
  If we can't use the AUMF to hold detainees and if we can't 
successfully prosecute them in a civilian court, then what can we do? 
The amendment ignores the reality of the threats that we face every 
day.
  Consistent with the laws of war, we have long recognized the 
authority to detain enemy combatants for the duration of hostilities. 
In the 2004 Hamdi decision, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the authority 
to detain a U.S. citizen captured fighting with the Taliban and who was 
later detained in the United States, and that such detainees have the 
right to challenge their detentions. Then the 2012 NDAA reaffirmed the 
detention authority provided by the 2001 AUMF as well as the right to 
habeas corpus determinations.
  The amendment overturns established legal precedent as well as 
undermines the statutory support for the AUMF. It does not make us 
safer, and it increases our peril. I urge my colleagues to vote against 
it.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Gibson).
  Mr. GIBSON. I thank the gentleman from Washington. I am honored to be 
offering this amendment with him.
  From our Bill of Rights, the Fifth Amendment: no person shall be 
deprived of life, liberty or property without due process. From our 
Sixth Amendment: the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and 
public trial.
  That is the supreme law of the land.
  Evidently, we have some ambiguity based out of the 2001 AUMF. So, 
clearly, we need to offer this amendment here today, and I rise in 
strong support of it.
  We think about the founding in that period, shortly after the 
Revolution, and remember the fact that we had Americans who at the time 
did not support the Revolution. There were a lot of hard feelings in 
the immediate aftermath of the war, but the one thing that united 
everyone was the way that we arrayed our institutions--to check 
absolute power--and, further, to check the power between the Federal 
and the State governments. Of course, underpinning all of that was the 
Bill of Rights, the Bill of Rights that unites all of us--united us 
then, unites us now.
  That's why I think it is very important that we bring clarity to this 
matter, that we pass Smith-Gibson and that we ensure that we bring 
clarity to the situation, which is that our Bill of Rights is the 
supreme law of the land.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Cotton).
  Mr. COTTON. Thank you.
  When I was a child, I played a game called hide-and-seek, as I 
suspect many of you might have played. There was a phrase in that game 
called ``ollie ollie oxen free,'' which meant you could come out, that 
you were safe, that you no longer had to hide.
  This amendment is the ``ollie ollie oxen free'' amendment of the war 
on terrorism. It invites al Qaeda and associated forces to send 
terrorists to the United States and to recruit terrorists on U.S. soil.
  Think about what happens if you're detained in the U.S. for 
committing an act of terrorism: you will not be detained while you are 
interrogated; you cannot be used to stop future attacks. Think about 
what will happen: you will get your Miranda warnings; you will get an 
attorney at taxpayer expense; and you will, if acquitted and not 
accepted by your home country, be released into the streets of the 
United States. We are encouraging al Qaeda to send terrorists here if 
we adopt this amendment.
  Consider also about an illegal alien crossing our border. If he does 
so to get a job, Customs and Border Patrol can detain him and summarily 
deport him. If he is detained by intelligence or military 
professionals, what happens? He goes into the court system, and he gets 
all the rights due to a common burglar.
  The concerns that we have about due process are misplaced. The law 
plainly lets every person--a citizen or foreigner--file a petition for 
the writ of habeas corpus to challenge his detention. I strongly oppose 
this amendment.

[[Page 9064]]


  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the 
gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Amash).
  Mr. AMASH. In 2011, Congress enacted a provision of the NDAA that 
authorizes the indefinite detention of Americans caught on U.S. soil. 
That provision, which is permanent law and continues to apply to this 
day, authorizes the President to detain persons who ``substantially 
supported'' forces ``associated'' with terrorists.
  It is important to note that ``substantial support'' and being 
``associated'' with terrorists were not defined in 2011 and still have 
not been defined by Congress. There is a good argument that this 
provision is unconstitutionally vague. In fact, a Federal court has 
already ruled that the provision is unconstitutional because it chills 
First Amendment association and free speech.
  Our Constitution does not permit the Federal Government to detain 
anyone in the United States indefinitely without charge or trial. I 
strongly believe in protecting the country's security and in equipping 
our Armed Forces with the tools they need to defeat our enemies, but 
the American people cannot support measures that, in the name of 
security, violate our constitutionally protected rights.
  The Constitution entitles all people to be charged with a crime and 
to be given a trial when the government detains them in the United 
States. Join me in affirming this right by voting for Smith-Gibson, 
which is the only amendment that protects the rights of those of you 
watching at home.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from New York (Mr. King).
  Mr. KING of New York. I thank my good friend, the chairman, for 
yielding, and I rise in opposition to the Smith-Gibson amendment.
  Let me express my deepest respect for the ranking member, Mr. Smith, 
and for my colleague from New York, Mr. Gibson, who has served his 
Nation long and well and who certainly acts with the very best of 
intentions. I certainly admire his patriotism and dedication.
  Having said that, I strongly identify with the remarks of Chairman 
McCaul and of Congressman Cotton. I think the ultimate fact here is 
that we would be giving terrorists more rights if they come to the 
United States than if they'd been captured overseas. To say that 
everyone captured in the United States is entitled to the full rights 
of a citizen or of a person lawfully in this country takes away from 
the fact that if a Nazi soldier had attacked the United States during 
World War II, would he have been entitled to all the rights of a 
citizen?

                              {time}  1650

  In fact, the Supreme Court ruled on that. We had Nazi saboteurs land 
in New York during World War II. They were arrested, tried before a 
military commission, and executed with the approval of the United 
States Supreme Court.
  In the Hamdi decision several years ago, the plurality of the Court 
said:

       There is no bar to this Nation's holding one of its own 
     citizens as an enemy combatant. A citizen, no less than an 
     alien, can be part of supporting forces hostile to the United 
     States or coalition partners and engage in an armed conflict 
     against the United States.

  The fact is we should not be saying there's an incentive for a 
terrorist to come from Afghanistan and come to the United States to 
fight because if he's captured here, he gets more rights than if he was 
captured in Afghanistan. This goes against, to me, common sense, and it 
in no way is what is happening under the AUMF and in any way a 
violation of the Constitution.
  With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield myself the balance of my time.
  There is no incentive for U.S. terrorists to come here. They are 
trying to attack us. But we capture them successfully, try them, and 
prosecute them.
  Abdulmutallab came here. He was captured. Yes, he was Mirandized. 
Even after he was Mirandized, he gave out an enormous amount of 
information that was very helpful. We convicted him.
  What this is essentially saying is that we don't trust the Department 
of Justice to do their job, so therefore we have to give the President 
the power to detain someone whether they have any evidence of a crime 
or not. If they come here, the Department of Justice does its job.
  We have tried and convicted over 400 terrorists in this country 
successfully. The only incentive to come here is if they're not going 
to commit a crime. All of the inmates down at Guantanamo were not 
captured in the U.S. No one who has been captured in the U.S. as a 
terrorist have we failed to convict.
  Let's trust the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't threaten us. 
The Constitution protects us. Let us use it, and use it to bring these 
terrorists to justice, as every single time we have successfully done.
  I urge support for the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of amendment No. 13 to 
H.R. 1960, ``National Defense Authorization Act for FY2014,'' offered 
by Ranking Member Smith and Congressman Gibson of New York.
  The amendment strikes Section 1022 of the FY2012 National Defense 
Authorization Act and amends Section 1021 of same law to eliminate 
indefinite military detention of any person detained under AUMF 
authority in the United States and its territories and possessions by 
providing immediate transfer to trial and proceedings by a court 
established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States 
or by an appropriate State court.
  This amendment would bar any President or any other government 
official from ordering the military to put anyone in the United States, 
or its territories or possessions, into indefinite detention without 
charge or trial, or to put anyone in the United States on trial before 
a military commission.
  Federal criminal courts are open, operating, experienced, and 
secure--and are the appropriate venue for any proceedings here in the 
United States itself.
  The Bill of Rights applies to all persons within the United States 
and its territories, this amendment is consistent with 233 years of 
constitutional precedent as it does not pick and choose between which 
persons on located on U.S. soil will receive constitutional 
protections.
  Further, the amendment bars the transfer of anyone in the United 
States to the military for indefinite detention without charge or 
trial. This provision is consistent with the Posse Comitatus Act, and 
would provide an additional protection against any misuse of civilian 
law enforcement as a way to put suspects into military detention 
without charge or trial.
  It is fully consistent with the Constitution, with the Posse 
Comitatus Act of 1878, and with the Non-Detention Act of 1971. It will 
reinforce the protections that most Americans assume apply--and do 
apply--within the United States.
  Since 2001, this executive power has only been utilized 3 times which 
makes it clear that it is not necessary to protect our national 
security; however, creates a gap in our civil liberties.
  This amendment would repeal section 1022 of the FY2012 NDAA. Section 
1022 requires the military to put some civilian suspects into military 
detention.
  The current Administration has waived application of section 1022 to 
many groups of potential suspects, but it has not foreclosed the 
possibility of section 1022 being applied to all categories of 
civilians, including even within the United States itself. To ensure 
this provision will not be used against those living in the United 
States, we must repeal section 1022.
  Our military is designed to fight and win our battles overseas and to 
protect our borders; it is not designed to enforce domestic laws.
  The military has not been required to enforce domestic laws since the 
Civil War. We have a Department of Justice, State and Federal 
Prosecutors, and local law enforcement that have been successful for 
hundreds of years.
  The amendment reaffirms the importance and availability of due 
process protections for all persons within the United States. It 
prohibits the NDAA detention provisions from providing any authority 
for the military to detain persons under any claim of authority under 
the NDAA or the Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001.
  I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting civil liberties and 
upholding the constitution by supporting this amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Smith).

[[Page 9065]]

  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington 
will be postponed.


             Amendments En Bloc No. 2 Offered by Mr.McKeon

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments 
en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 2 consisting of amendment Nos. 27, 31, 38, 43, 
44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 54, 81, 84, 85, 95, 96, 97, 114, 143, 164, and 165, 
printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of 
California:


         Amendment No. 27 Offered by Mr. Larson of Connecticut

       Page 299, after the matter following line 23, insert the 
     following:

     SEC. 703. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TREATMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL 
                   DISABILITIES UNDER TRICARE.

       (a) In General.--Section 1077 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(g)(1) Subject to paragraph (3)(A), in providing health 
     care under subsection (a), the treatment of developmental 
     disabilities (as defined by section 102(8) of the 
     Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 
     of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002(8))), including autism spectrum 
     disorder, shall include behavioral health treatment, 
     including applied behavior analysis, when prescribed by a 
     physician.
       ``(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall 
     ensure that--
       ``(A) except as provided by subparagraph (B), a person who 
     is authorized to provide behavioral health treatment is 
     licensed or certified by a State or accredited national 
     certification board; and
       ``(B) applied behavior analysis or other behavioral health 
     treatment may be provided by an employee, contractor, or 
     trainee of a person described in subparagraph (A) if the 
     employee, contractor, or trainee meets minimum 
     qualifications, training, and supervision requirements as set 
     forth by the Secretary.
       ``(3)(A) This subsection shall not apply to--
       ``(i) a medicare eligible beneficiary (as defined in 
     section 1111(b) of this title); or
       ``(ii) a covered beneficiary who is a beneficiary by reason 
     of being a retired member of the Coast Guard, the 
     Commissioned Corp of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
     Administration, or the Commissioned Corp of the Public Health 
     Service, or by being a dependent of such a retired member.
       ``(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (A), nothing in 
     this subsection shall be construed as limiting or otherwise 
     affecting the benefits otherwise provided to a covered 
     beneficiary under--
       ``(i) this chapter;
       ``(ii) title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
     1395 et seq.); or
       ``(iii) any other law.''.
       (b) Funding.--
       (1) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program, 
     as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 
     4501, for Private Sector Care is hereby increased by 
     $60,000,000.
       (2) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, 
     as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 
     4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Line 280) 
     is hereby reduced by $60,000,000.


            Amendment No. 31 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

       At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

     SEC. 833. REVISIONS TO REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO JUSTIFICATION 
                   AND APPROVAL OF SOLE-SOURCE DEFENSE CONTRACTS.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall modify the 
     provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement to the 
     Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section 811 of 
     the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
     (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2401) to clarify that the 
     authority of the head of an agency (as defined in section 
     811(c)(2)(A) of such section) to make an award pursuant to 
     such section is delegable.


         Amendment No. 38 Offered by Mr. Bentivolio of Michigan

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII, add the following:

     SEC. 1259. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING RELATIONS WITH TAIWAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that the United States should--
       (1) allow all high-level officials of Taiwan to enter into 
     the United States or its embassies and consulates under 
     conditions which demonstrate appropriate respect for the 
     dignity of such leaders;
       (2) allow meetings between all high-level Taiwan and United 
     States officials in United States executive departments;
       (3) allow the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative 
     Office and all other instrumentalities established in the 
     United States by Taiwan to conduct business activities, 
     including activities which involve participation by Members 
     of Congress and other representatives of Federal, State, and 
     local governments, and all high-level Taiwan officials, 
     without obstruction from the United States Government or any 
     foreign power; and
       (4) adopt a policy of allowing high-ranking Taiwan leaders 
     to make official visits with high-ranking officials of the 
     United States, including official visits by Taiwan's 
     democratically elected president, and allowing for visits 
     between these officials in Washington, D.C.


          Amendment No. 43 Offered by Mr. Lamborn of Colorado

       Page 59, after line 12, insert the following:

     SEC. 225. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SPACE-BASED 
                   INFRARED SYSTEMS SPACE PROGRAM.

       Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 
     Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be 
     obligated or expended for the space-based infrared systems 
     space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view testbed 
     until the Executive Agent for Space of the Department of 
     Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees 
     that the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the 
     Operationally Responsive Space Program Office in accordance 
     with section 2273a of title 10, United States Code.


           Amendment No. 44 Offered by Mr. Holt of New Jersey

       At the end of subtitle D of title II, insert the following:

     SEC. 255. REPORT ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND 
                   MATHEMATICS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report that assesses 
     whether the Science, Mathematics and Research for 
     Transformation (SMART) scholarship program, or related 
     scholarship or fellowship programs within the Department of 
     Defense, are providing the necessary number of undergraduate 
     and graduate students in the fields of science, technology, 
     engineer, and mathematics to meet the recommendations 
     contained in the report of the Commission on Research and 
     Development in the United States Intelligence Community, as 
     well as recommendation for how SMART and similar program 
     might be improved to better satisfy those recommendations.


        Amendment No. 45 Offered by Mr. Hudson of North Carolina

       At the end of subtitle E of title II, add the following:

     SEC. 2__. CANINES AS STAND-OFF DETECTION OF EXPLOSIVES AND 
                   EXPLOSIVE PRECURSORS.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
     Technology, and Logistics shall provide to the Committee on 
     Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that--
       (1) describes how the Department of Defense intends to 
     maintain the capability and infrastructure required to 
     support canines as stand-off detection of explosives and 
     explosive precursors;
       (2) specifies the appropriate office to oversee the 
     acquisition process, research and development, technology 
     advancement, testing and evaluation, and production and 
     procurement with respect to canines as stand-off detection of 
     explosives and explosive precursors;
       (3) specifies the plan to sustain and enhance the 
     partnerships and relationships of the Department of Defense 
     with service laboratories, private sector companies, and 
     academic institutions to ensure that the latest data and 
     information regarding canine capabilities are distributed 
     throughout the Department and other Federal agencies that 
     could benefit from such information; and
       (4) specifies any technologies capable of replacing the 
     canine as a stand-off detection capability during the next 2 
     years.


         Amendment No. 46 Offered by Mrs. Bachmann of Minnesota

       Page 93, after line 18, insert the following:

     SEC. 302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR MARINE SECURITY 
                   GUARD.

       (a) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as 
     specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, 
     for Marine Security Guard is hereby increased by $13,400,000.
       (b) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance,

[[Page 9066]]

     Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4301, is hereby reduced by $13,400,000, to be derived 
     from the Maneuver Units.


         Amendment No. 47 Offered by Mrs. Bachmann of Minnesota

       Page 93, after line 18, insert the following:

     SEC. 302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE 
                   FORCE.

       (a) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as 
     specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, 
     for the Crisis Response Force is hereby increased by 
     $10,600,000.
       (b) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the 
     funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be 
     appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, 
     Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4301, is hereby reduced by $10,600,000, to be derived 
     from the Maneuver Units.


          Amendment No. 49 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

       Page 106, after line 8, insert the following:

     SEC. 324. ASSESSMENT OF OUTREACH FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS 
                   OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY WOMEN AND MINORITIES 
                   REQUIRED BEFORE CONVERSION OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS 
                   TO CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE.

        No Department of Defense function that is performed by 
     Department of Defense civilian employees and is tied to a 
     certain military base may be converted to performance by a 
     contractor until the Secretary of Defense conducts an 
     assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has 
     carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small 
     business concerns owned and controlled by women (as such term 
     is defined in section 8(d)(3)(D) of the Small Business Act) 
     and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially 
     and economically disadvantaged individuals (as such term is 
     defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act) that 
     are located in the geographic area near the military base.


          Amendment No. 54 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

       Page 223, after line 23, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 550A. ENHANCEMENT TO REQUIREMENTS FOR AVAILABILITY OF 
                   INFORMATION ON SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND 
                   RESPONSE RESOURCES.

       (a) Required Posting of Information on Sexual Assault 
     Prevention and Response Resources.--
       (1) Posting.--The Secretary of Defense shall require that 
     there be prominently posted, in accordance with paragraph 
     (2), notice of the following information relating to sexual 
     assault prevention and response, in a form designed to ensure 
     visibility and understanding:
       (A) Resource information for members of the Armed Forces, 
     military dependents, and civilian personnel of the Department 
     of Defense with respect to prevention of sexual assault and 
     reporting of incidents of sexual assault.
       (B) Contact information for personnel who are designated as 
     Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault 
     Victim Advocates.
       (C) The Department of Defense ``hotline'' telephone number, 
     referred to as the Safe Helpline, for reporting incidents of 
     sexual assault, or any successor operation.
       (2) Posting placement.--Posting under subsection (a) shall 
     be at the following locations, to the extent practicable:
       (A) Any Department of Defense duty facility.
       (B) Any Department of Defense dining facility.
       (C) Any Department of Defense multi-unit residential 
     facility.
       (D) Any Department of Defense health care facility.
       (E) Any Department of Defense commissary or exchange.
       (F) Any Department of Defense Community Service Agency.
       (G) Any Department of Defense website.
       (b) Notice to Victims of Available Assistance.--The 
     Secretary of Defense shall require that procedures in the 
     Department of Defense for responding to a complaint or 
     allegation of sexual assault submitted by or against a member 
     of the Armed Forces include prompt notice to the person 
     making the complaint or allegation of the forms of assistance 
     available to that person from the Department of Defense and, 
     to the extent known to the Secretary, through other 
     departments and agencies, including State and local agencies, 
     and other sources.


           Amendment No. 81 Offered by Mr. Holt of New Jersey

       At the end of subtitle C of title VII, insert the 
     following:

     SEC. 726. DATA SHARING WITH STATE ADJUTANT GENERALS TO 
                   FACILITATE SUICIDE PREVENTION EFFORTS.

       Upon the request of any adjutant general of a State, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall share the contact information of 
     members of the Individual Ready Reserve and individual 
     mobilization augmentees who reside in the State of such 
     adjutant general for the purpose of conducting suicide 
     prevention outreach efforts.


          Amendment No. 84 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

       Page 308, after line 21, add the following new section:

     SEC. 726. INCREASED COLLABORATION WITH NIH TO COMBAT TRIPLE 
                   NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER.

       The Office of Health of the Department of Defense shall 
     work in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health 
     to--
       (1) identify specific genetic and molecular targets and 
     biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer; and
       (2) provide information useful in biomarker selection, drug 
     discovery, and clinical trials design that will enable both--
       (A) triple negative breast cancer patients to be identified 
     earlier in the progression of their disease; and
       (B) the development of multiple targeted therapies for the 
     disease.


          Amendment No. 85 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 726. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELORS FOR 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THEIR FAMILIES.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to 
     ensure a sustainable flow of qualified counselors to meet the 
     long-term needs of members of the Armed Forces and their 
     families for counselors; and
       (2) the plan should include the participation of accredited 
     schools and universities, health care providers, professional 
     counselors, family service or support centers, chaplains, and 
     other appropriate resources of the Department of Defense.


          Amendment No. 95 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas

       Page 335, after line 12, insert the following:

     SEC. 833. IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF DEFENSE EQUIPMENT AND 
                   SUPPLIES THROUGH AUTOMATED INFORMATION AND DATA 
                   CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES.

       The Secretary of Defense shall improve the management of 
     defense equipment and supplies throughout their life cycles 
     by adopting and implementing Item Unique Identification 
     (IUID), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), biometrics, 
     and other automated information and data capture (AIDC) 
     technologies for the tracking, management, and accountability 
     for assets deployed across the Department of Defense.


            Amendment No. 96 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

       At the end of subtitle A of title IX, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 9__. REPORT ON STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF UNITED STATES 
                   MILITARY INSTALLATION OF THE U.S. PACIFIC 
                   COMMAND.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 
     in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     on the strategic value of each major installation that 
     supports operations in the United States Pacific Command.
       (b) Content of Report.--The report required by subsection 
     (a) shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of the 
     following with respect to each major installation covered by 
     the report:
       (1) The strategic value of the operations of the 
     installation in the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility, 
     including the strategic value of the installation for the 
     global deployment of airpower, military personnel, and 
     logistical support.
       (2) The usefulness of the installation for potential future 
     missions, including military, search and rescue, and 
     humanitarian missions in a changing Pacific and Arctic 
     region.
       (3) The suitability of the installation for basing of F-35 
     aircraft and other future weapons systems in the Pacific 
     Command Area of Responsibility.
       (4) The suitability of the installation for mission growth, 
     including relocation of combat-coded aircraft, Army units, 
     naval vessels, and Marine Corps units from overseas bases.
       (5) How critical the installation is in maintaining and 
     expanding the North and Southern Pacific air refueling 
     bridge.
       (6) The availability of the installation for basing 
     remotely piloted aircraft.
       (7) The proximity of the installation to scoreable, 
     instrumented training ranges, with an emphasis on joint-
     training.
       (8) The impact of urban encroachment on the installation 
     and its training ranges.
       (c) Classified Annex.--The report required by subsection 
     (a) may include a classified annex if necessary to fully 
     describe the matters required by subsection (b).


            Amendment No. 97 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

       At the end of subtitle A of title IX, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 9__. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON POTENTIAL RELOCATION 
                   OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TENANTS ON ASIA-PACIFIC 
                   AND ARCTIC-ORIENTED UNITED STATES MILITARY 
                   INSTALLATIONS.

       (a) Report Required.--Not later than March 1, 2014, the 
     Comptroller General of the

[[Page 9067]]

     United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of 
     Congress a report containing the results of a review of the 
     potential for--
       (1) effectively consolidating underused facilities on 
     military installations; or
       (2) vacating costly leased space by relocating Federal 
     Government agency tenants, activities, missions, and 
     personnel onto such installations.
       (b) Specific Consideration of Asia-Pacific and Arctic-
     oriented Installations.--As a result of the Federal 
     Government's decision to emphasize Asia-Pacific security 
     issues and changes in the Arctic environment, the Comptroller 
     General shall specifically evaluate potential consolidation 
     of Federal tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented 
     installations, focusing on Federal entities with homeland 
     security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other 
     national security-related functions that are compatible with 
     the missions of the military installations.


        Amendment No. 114 Offered by Mrs. Bachmann of Minnesota

       Page 463, after line 6, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 1090. DAYS ON WHICH THE POW/MIA FLAG IS DISPLAYED ON 
                   CERTAIN FEDERAL PROPERTY.

       Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by 
     striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(c) Days for Flag Display.--For the purposes of this 
     section, POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the 
     flag of the United States is displayed.''.


          Amendment No. 143 Offered by Mr. Lamborn of Colorado

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE THREAT POSED BY HEZBOLLAH.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) Hezbollah has been designated a foreign terrorist 
     organization by the Department of State since October 8, 
     1997.
       (2) Hezbollah has been responsible for numerous terrorist 
     attacks and attempted terrorist attacks around the world, 
     including attacks against United States citizens.
       (3) Hezbollah is active in Europe and has been linked to a 
     July 18, 2012, suicide bombing in Bulgaria which killed five 
     people.
       (4) Hezbollah operatives have been captured around the 
     world attacking or attempting to attack Western and Israeli 
     targets.
       (5) The United States is working with its European allies 
     to combat terrorism through a variety of means, including 
     through NATO's Partnership Action Plan against Terrorism and 
     the Defence Against Terrorism Programme of Work.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States should continue to use all necessary 
     means to fight against terrorism, including Hezbollah;
       (2) President Obama should strongly encourage his European 
     counterparts to publicly condemn Hezbollah;
       (3) European allies should seek to officially recognize 
     Hezbollah as a terrorist organization;
       (4) any attempt to distinguish between military and 
     civilian wings in Hezbollah is meaningless; and
       (5) all countries should work together to fight radical 
     terrorist organizations like Hezbollah.


            Amendment No. 164 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

       At the end of title XXXV, add the following new section:

     SEC. 35__. TREATMENT OF FUNDS FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION 
                   MARITIME FACILITY, PORT OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA.

       Section 10205 of Public Law 109-59 (119 Stat. 1934) is 
     amended by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may''.


            Amendment No. 165 Offered by Mr. Young of Alaska

       At the end of title XXXV (page 730, after line 19) add the 
     following:

     SEC. 350_. STRATEGIC SEAPORTS.

       (a) Priority.--
       (1) In general.--Under the port infrastructure development 
     program established under section 50302(c) of title 46, 
     United States Code, the Maritime Administrator, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may give priority 
     to providing funding to strategic seaports in support of 
     national security requirements.
       (2) Strategic seaport defined.--In this subsection the term 
     ``strategic seaport'' means a military port or and commercial 
     port that is subject to a port planning order or Basic 
     Ordering Agreement (or both) that is projected to be used for 
     the deployment of forces and shipment of ammunition or 
     sustainment supplies in support of military operations.
       (b) Financial Assistance.--Section 50302(c)(2)(D) of title 
     46, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``and 
     financial assistance, including grants,'' after ``technical 
     assistance''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Smith) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to my friend and 
colleague, the gentlelady from Minnesota (Mrs. Bachmann).
  Mrs. BACHMANN. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in support of this 
amendment package which includes three amendments which I've offered to 
protect and honor America's brave men and women in uniform.
  The first and the second amendments would both properly train and 
equip and staff the Marine Embassy Security Group and the Crisis 
Response Task Force. In the wake of Benghazi and the tragedy there, 
protecting our Nation's Embassy personnel and classified materials has 
never been more important.
  The third amendment requires certain Federal buildings that are 
already required to fly the POW/MIA flags on Federal holidays to fly 
those flags every day. We owe it to the memory of those who serve, to 
honor their commitment and give them the funding and the support that 
they need.
  I urge my colleagues to support this package, and I want to thank Mr. 
McKeon.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 4 minutes to the 
gentlelady from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee).
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Let me thank the gentleman from Washington for his 
leadership and the gentleman from California for their work and their 
work with my office and staff.
  One of the efforts that we have been working on--when I say that, 
Congress and individual Members--is to approach and to continue to work 
on the issue of breast cancer that impacts women throughout this 
country, and certainly women and men in the United States military.
  I'm very pleased in this en bloc to have an amendment by Jackson Lee 
that really cements the collaboration between the Department of Defense 
Office of Health to collaborate with the National Institutes of Health 
to provide resources, to identify specific genetic and molecular 
targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer, often not 
heard of.
  I will tell you, in the course of my involvement, I've had daughters 
of those who lost their lives--triple negative breast cancer is a 
particularly negative but deadly form of breast cancer where the victim 
does not last very long. I've lost dear friends. And this highlighting 
the biomarker will bring down the cost of treatment, but more 
importantly will help to stem the tide of those who quickly die because 
there is no treatment because it accelerates so quickly and lives are 
lost.
  I also am grateful that we are beginning to make some steps. Though I 
indicated my support for the Speier and Gabbard amendment, I am pleased 
to be able to have in this language, a board, a place where sexual 
assault prevention information and resources bring it out in the open 
and let people know, men and women, how they can access resources. 
Let's put it forward so that people are safe, so that we can stop it 
and get in the gap. I think honoring our men and women in the United 
States military is particularly important.
  Over the years, I have supported increased funding for PTSD and 
recognized the crises that many of our soldiers are facing in the need 
for mental health services. We can see some of the impact of those in 
terms of family situations and violence, domestic violence. So I have 
in this en bloc an amendment that will provide more mental health 
counselors, or focus on more mental health counselors, to ensure that 
the 200,000 veterans of military service and Active Duty soldiers will 
have the ability to be able to get that kind of service.
  It is also important to be fiscally responsible, and I have an 
amendment that improves the management of defense equipment and 
supplies through automated information data-captured technology. This 
will support the work of the DOD to adopt a proven private sector 
method for more efficiently

[[Page 9068]]

managing inventory, and that's inventory going from what we have in 
Afghanistan to left over in Iraq and to many other places. We want to 
save money.
  I also am very grateful that there is a manager's amendment in this 
en bloc, something very close and near and dear to my heart, and that 
is the outreach by the Department of Defense to small businesses, 
minority-owned businesses and women-owned businesses. I can tell you 
that they are the backbone of America. Even though we are downsizing on 
some of the contractual relationships, I can tell you that obviously 
they bring about $537 billion as obligated by Federal agencies. These 
small businesses can benefit. They create jobs. And the outreach is 
going to be vital beyond where the bases are, beyond where the areas 
where you would likely think.
  Let me also say this. I want to thank the committee for working with 
me on an amendment that I thought was very important, and that is the 
study of the procurement practices of our intelligence assets and to be 
able to improve how we deal with intelligence. I know that we will work 
together on that going forward, and I believe that it is important that 
we do work together.
  These are amendments that I believe will improve the conditions of 
our very important military personnel. And again, to all of them, Happy 
Father's Day.
  Mr. McKEON. At this time, Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young) for the purpose of a colloquy.
  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise to 
thank my good friend and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee 
for including my amendment on section 811 of the fiscal year 2010 
National Defense Authorization Act in one of today's en bloc packages 
and to ask if he is concerned, as I am, that implementation by Federal 
agencies of section 811 of the FY10 National Defense Authorization Act 
has been inconsistent and contrary to the congressional intent.
  Mr. McKEON. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I yield to the gentleman from California.

                              {time}  1700

  Mr. McKEON. I thank the gentleman from Alaska for raising concern 
over inconsistency in implementation of section 811 and bringing it to 
our attention.
  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I thank the gentleman and ask the distinguished 
chairman of the Armed Services Committee if he agrees with me that 
section 811 was not intended to be a cap or bar on sole-source awards 
above $20 million, and to also ask if he is concerned about the growing 
number of reports that agencies are treating the threshold requiring 
sole-source justification as a prohibition on such awards.
  Mr. McKEON. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I yield to the gentleman.
  Mr. McKEON. I agree that section 811 was intended to provide 
increased oversight of sole-source contract awards but was not intended 
to be a prohibition on such contracts.
  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. Mr. Chairman, I ask you to join me and my 
colleague from Hawaii (Ms. Hanabusa) in continued oversight of Federal 
agency implementation of section 811 and in requesting the Comptroller 
General provide us a full report with respect to any inconsistencies in 
the ways agencies are implementing section 811, the negative impacts 
such section is having on Native American contractors, and provide 
recommendations on how the provision should be better implemented. Such 
a report will aid Congress in ensuring that section 811 is implemented 
so as to make clear that the provision does not impose a cap or limit 
on awards covered by the provision, so long as the justifications and 
approval are obtained pursuant to provision, and that the provision is 
intended to provide a level of oversight and approval, not act as a 
prohibition or limit on awards.
  Mr. McKEON. I will be happy to work with the gentleman and with our 
colleague from Hawaii to send a joint letter to the Comptroller General 
in the manner he suggests and to continue oversight on this issue.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
California (Ms. Hahn).
  Ms. HAHN. Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of amendment 246, 
which is a bipartisan amendment that I cosponsored with my good friend 
and colleague, Congressman Don Young.
  Despite the vital role they play to our economic strength and 
national security, our ports, unlike nearly every other mode of 
transportation, still do not have a dedicated source of Federal funding 
for infrastructure projects.
  Ensuring ports have the infrastructure funding they need is not only 
critical to strengthening our economy, but also to making sure that our 
ports can handle the sudden needs of rapid deployment in the outbreak 
of war or during a national emergency.
  This amendment would allow the Maritime Administration to provide 
infrastructure grants to our Nation's ports and prioritize funding for 
our strategic seaports.
  By finally giving MARAD the tools that they need to successfully 
mitigate congestion and increase the flow of goods at U.S. ports, we 
will ensure our ports will be fully prepared to serve our national 
defense and continue to be the strong economic engine that drives our 
Nation's prosperity.
  I want to thank Congressman Young for working with me on this 
amendment, as well as my colleague from California, Chairman McKeon, 
and Ranking Member Smith for accepting this amendment en bloc.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Alaska (Mr. Young).
  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. I thank the chairman for including my amendment 
in this package.
  My amendment is very simple. It asks the Department of Defense to 
report on what actually makes an installation in the Pacific 
strategically important. In my many meetings with military leaders, I'm 
always told about the strategic importance of various installations in 
Alaska and all across this country; however, ``strategic'' is never 
fully defined. My amendment merely asks the Department of Defense to 
qualify and quantify exactly what makes an installation strategic.
  As every Alaskan knows, Alaska has numerous strategic installations 
that proudly protect this country from harm. Among those bases is 
Eielson Air Force Base in Fairbanks, which is the home to the 18th 
Aggressor Squadron. This squadron provides our Nation's pilots with 
real-life training they need to be the best in the world. Throughout 
the year, but especially during Red Flag-Alaska, the F-16 Aggressors 
fight realistic mock battles in the largest training range in the 
United States, and it's one of the most terrain diverse training areas 
in the world.
  Eielson Air Force Base is also home to the strategically important 
168th Air Guard Refueling Wing. These KC-135s provide legs for our 
Nation's northern air bridge, which allows us to project power into the 
Arctic and the Northern Pacific. I have confidence that my amendment 
and the following DOD report will show what General Billy Mitchell 
recognized in 1935, namely, that Alaska is the most strategic place in 
the world.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Hawaii (Ms. Hanabusa).
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of en bloc 
amendment 244, the Young-Hanabusa amendment.
  Section 811 of the fiscal year 2010 NDAA required that any 8(a) 
Native American sole-source contract in excess of $20 million go 
through a heightened justification and approval.
  The justification and approval is often interpreted to be approved by 
a ``head of agency.'' This requirement is shown by a recent GAO report 
to cause a 60 percent decline in revenue from these contracts. It has 
resulted in a

[[Page 9069]]

loss of jobs, reduced benefits to Native Americans, and has led to a 
large amount of unintended discrimination against Native community-
owned firms. What the amendment does is it makes it a delegable 
authority.
  In my home State of Hawaii, there are numerous 8(a) enterprises known 
as Native Hawaiian Organizations. These entities are conducting 
critical research for our defense industry and other sectors of 
government while also supporting critical programs within the 
community. It makes no sense to place onerous requirements on these 
successful organizations that significantly decrease the ability to 
conduct business.
  Further, I support a letter to the GAO requesting a full and detailed 
report with respect to any inconsistencies in the way the agencies are 
implementing section 811, the negative impacts such section is having 
on Native American contractors, along with recommendations of how the 
provisions should be implemented.
  Mr. Chairman, I would also like to thank the chairman, the ranking 
member, and my colleague Mr. Young from Alaska for this amendment and 
for placing it in the en bloc package.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to highlight my amendment No. 
143, which expresses the sense of Congress highlighting the threat 
posed by Hezbollah.
  Hezbollah is one of the world's most dangerous terrorist 
organizations. After al Qaeda, it is responsible for the most deaths of 
American citizens. Hezbollah is behind a series of terrorist attacks 
around the world, including the foiled plot to assassinate the Saudi 
Ambassador here in Washington.
  Hezbollah is backed by the Iranian regime and has now joined the 
fight to protect another Iranian proxy, the Assad regime in Syria.
  Hezbollah was behind an attack last summer in Bulgaria that killed 
five people. Unfortunately, the European Union has not yet listed 
Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.
  My amendment calls on the EU to recognize that Hezbollah is a 
terrorist organization. Please vote ``yes'' on this amendment to stand 
against terrorism.
  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, we have no further speakers. I urge 
adoption of the en bloc amendment, and I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking 
Member Smith and the Rules Committee for making in order and including 
in En Bloc Amendment #1 Amendment Number 35 and Amendment Number 111 to 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
  These amendments are offered by the House Committee on Homeland 
Security's Chairman McCaul, Ranking Member Bennie Thompson, as well as 
the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security's Chairwoman Miller 
and Ranking Member Jackson Lee.
  In addition to the Jackson Lee amendments offered to this bill, I 
joined my Colleagues on the Committee on Homeland Security in 
supporting an amendment to promote collaboration and cooperation 
between the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security 
regarding the identification of equipment, either declared excess, or 
made available to DHS on a long-term loan basis that will help increase 
security along the border.
  I also request that my colleagues support another amendment that I 
joined in sponsoring along with the leadership of the House Committee 
on Homeland Security, which would allow the transfer of technology from 
DOD to state and local law enforcement. Before the creation of DHS a 
program was created to facilitate this type of equipment transfer and 
this amendment adds the Secretary of Homeland Security in a 
consultative role in the equipment transfer process. This amendment 
also gives applicants seeking DOD equipment for use in border security 
preference in this statute. This will facilitate expedited transfer of 
equipment that Federal, state and local first responders can use to 
strengthen our border security efforts.
  I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for including these 
amendments in the En Bloc Amendment #1 and I urge all members to vote 
in favor of this amendment.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking 
Member Smith and the Rules Committee for making in order and including 
in En Bloc Amendment #2 three amendments that I offered to the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
  The Jackson Lee Amendments are simple and if adopted would improve 
the final bill.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #81 calls for the 
collaboration between the Department of Defense and the National 
Institutes of Health to combat Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The 
Amendment directs the Department of Defense Office of Health to 
collaborate with the National Institutes of Health to provide resources 
to identify specific genetic and molecular targets and biomarkers for 
TNBC.


                  Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

  Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a term used to describe 
breast cancers whose cells do not have estrogen receptors and 
progesterone receptors, and do not have an excess of the ``HER2'' 
protein on their cell membrane of tumor cells.
  Between 10-17% of female breast cancer patients have the triple 
negative subtype.
  Three times more likely to cause death than the most common form of 
breast cancer, 70% of women with metastatic triple negative breast 
cancer do not live more than five years after being diagnosed.
  There is no targeted treatment available for TNBC. The American 
Cancer Society calls this particular strain of breast cancer ``an 
aggressive subtype associated with lower survival rates.''
  Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) cells are usually of a higher 
grade and size; onset at a younger age; more aggressive; and more 
likely to metastasize.
  TNBC is in fact a heterogeneous group of cancers with varying 
differences in prognosis and survival rate between various subtypes. 
This has led to a lot of confusion amongst both physicians and 
patients.
  Apart from surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy is the only available 
treatment; targeted molecular treatments, while being investigated, are 
not accepted treatment.


                      Populations Affected by TNBC

  TNBC disproportionately impacts younger women, African American 
women, Hispanic/Latina women, and women with a ``BRCA1'' genetic 
mutation, which is prevalent in Jewish women.
  TNBC usually affects women under 50 years of age.
  More than 30% of all breast cancer diagnoses in African American are 
of the triple negative variety. Black women are far more susceptible to 
this dangerous subtype than white or Hispanic women.
  Women with TNBC are more likely to have distant metastases in the 
brain and lung than more common subtypes of breast cancer.
  Breast cancers with specific, targeted treatment methods, such as 
hormone and gene based strains, have higher survival rates than the 
triple negative subtype, highlighting the need for a targeted 
treatment.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #88 directs the Department of 
Defense to post information on sexual assault prevention and response 
resources online for ease of access by men and women in the armed 
services.
  There is no greater crime that an individual can commit than the 
crime of sexual molestation and sexual assault. The perpetrators of 
these crimes rob victims of their dignity and sense of wellbeing. 
Victimization is not easily relieved by treating the immediate physical 
injuries that may result, but can last for years. Moreover, victims of 
sexual assault are profoundly affected for the rest of their lives, 
often with PTSD or other medical conditions. As elected officials, we 
have an obligation to condemn this violence, work for stronger 
enforcement of laws and provide adequate funding for programs to assist 
individuals who may have experienced such abuse.
  When the victim is a member of the armed forces, the crime is much 
more traumatic because the assailant may be a superior officer or the 
location of the crime far from our shores. Further, the mechanisms in 
place to support civilians who are victims of sexual violence are often 
not available to men and women in the military.
  In 2012, the Department of Defense estimates that 26,000 men and 
women in the armed forces are victims of some type of unwanted sexual 
contact. This reflects a 40 percent increase over a two year period. 
The report provided by the Defense Department suggests that the 
majority of the crimes involved rape, aggravated sexual assault or 
nonconsensual sodomy.
  We know that victims of sexual violence or abuse among civilians are 
routinely underreported. The Defense Department report

[[Page 9070]]

states that of the 26,000 estimated victims only 3,374 crimes were 
reported and just 302 of the 2,558 incidents pursued by victims were 
prosecuted.
  This crime is not limited to women who are victims of men, but 
include men who are victims of other men. The Defense Department report 
states that 81 percent of sexual violence against men goes unreported 
and just 5 percent of attacks are reported to civilian law enforcement. 
The stigma is great for any victim of sexual violence, but it may be 
more so for men because civilian society has accepted the reality of 
sexual violence against women and children but is just becoming aware 
of crimes against men.
  In 2011, the Journal of Trauma and Dissociation reports that men in 
the military face barriers to reporting sexual crimes that include 
avoidance/blocking the incident, fear of retribution, fear of facing 
charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for associated 
behavior like drinking, fear that reporting will damage their military 
career and fear of not being believed.
  Sexual assault can be verbal, visual, or anything that forces a 
person to join in unwanted sexual contact or attention. Examples of 
this are voyeurism (when someone watches private sexual acts), 
exhibitionism (when someone exposes him/herself in public), incest 
(sexual contact between family members), and sexual harassment. It can 
happen in different situations, by a stranger in an isolated place, on 
a date, or in the place where a person sleeps by someone they know.
  The negative impacts of sexual assault go beyond the physical trauma 
of the attack itself. The victims suffer psychological trauma, 
emotional scarring, shame, anger, the stigma of being victimized. 
Victims often suffer in silence for years before they can gain the 
courage to seek help.
  Unfortunately, sexual assault is an issue that has plagued the Nation 
and we are learning that men and women in the armed forces cannot 
escape its effects. In my home state of Texas, nearly 2 million adult 
Texans, or 12.6% of the population, have been sexually assaulted, and 
more than half of all sexual assaults are committed against children 
under age 18.
  An estimated 82% of rapes go unreported. The vast majority of rape 
victims--nearly 80%--know the person who rapes them.


                        Purpose of my Amendment

  The goal of the amendment is to make sure that information is 
available and easily accessible to military personnel for the purpose 
of raising awareness, promoting education and the long term goal of 
influencing organizational culture around the issue of sexual violence.
  Many in the military are just learning that there is a huge 
difference between sex and sexual violence. My amendment would educate 
both victims, potential victims, witnesses or victimizers that these 
are acts of violence and should be treated as such. It may also help 
influence thinking among military leaders on the nature of these crimes 
and promote changes in policy to aggressively provide support to 
victims and judicial remedies to prosecute and punish criminal 
behavior.
  It will take more than just stronger prevention and enforcement of 
the law to prevent sexual molestation and other forms of sexual 
assault. It is also raising awareness, which is what my amendment does. 
In order to end this serious epidemic that plagues the American Armed 
forces, all segments of the military from the most junior to the most 
senior officers should be aware of what a sexual crime is and how to 
reduce the incidents or them. Victims are not at fault--victimizers are 
criminals who intend to subjugate, humiliate, dominate and hurt their 
victims. They are predators among those who honorably serve in defense 
of our nation. They should not be tolerated, condoned, protected, given 
refuge or enabled in any way.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #82 expresses the sense of 
the Congress that the Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to 
ensure a sustainable flow of qualified mental health counselors to meet 
the long-term needs of members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and their 
families.
  I have always been a supporter of the men and women in the military, 
visiting every combat zone, including Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, with 
numerous visits to Afghanistan and Iraq.
  Houston is home to one of the largest populations of military service 
members and their families in the nation. There are over 200,000 
veterans of military service who live and work in Houston; more than 
13,000 are veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. For the brave men and 
women who have been wounded in combat, help is on the way.
  Although some of a soldier's wounds are invisible to the naked eye 
they are still wounds that should be properly treated. One of the best 
ways to increase access to treatment is to increase the number of 
medical facilities and mental health professionals who are available to 
serve the needs of men and women currently serving and those who have 
become veterans.
  The current conflict in Afghanistan is the most continuous combat 
operations since Vietnam.
  One study published in the American Journal of Medicine indicated 
that 94% of soldiers returning from Iraq reported receiving small-arms 
fire.
  In addition, 86% of soldiers in Iraq reported knowing someone who was 
seriously injured or killed, 68% reported seeing dead or seriously 
injured Americans, and 51% reported handling or uncovering human 
remains.
  The majority, 77%, of soldiers deployed to Iraq reported shooting or 
directing fire at the enemy, 48% reported being responsible for the 
death of an enemy combatant, and 28% reported being responsible for the 
death of a noncombatant. (Hoge et al., 2004).
  In addition to these Jackson Lee Amendments, I joined my Colleagues 
on the Committee on Homeland Security in supporting an amendment to 
promote collaboration between the Department of Defense and Department 
of Homeland security regarding the identification of equipment, either 
declared excess, or made available to DHS on a long-term loan basis 
that will help increase security along the border.
  This is a common-sense way to leverage equipment the taxpayer has 
already paid for and is coming back from overseas and no longer needed 
for military purposes is a wise use of these resources.
  I also request that my colleagues support another amendment that I 
joined in sponsoring along with the leadership of the House Committee 
on Homeland Sec, which would allow the transfer of technology from DOD 
to state and local law enforcement. Before the creation of DHS, a 
program was created to facilitate this type of equipment transfer, and 
this amendment adds the Secretary of Homeland Security in a 
consultative role in the equipment transfer process. This amendment 
also gives applicants seek DOD equipment for use in border security 
preference in this statute. This will facilitate expedited transfer of 
equipment that Federal, state and local first responders can use to 
strengthen our border security efforts.
  I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for including these 
amendments in the En Bloc Amendment #2 and I urge all members to vote 
in favor of this amendment.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, the Rules Committee made several 
amendments I offered to the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2014 in order.
  The Jackson Lee Amendments are simple and if adopted would improve 
the final bill.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #95 provides for the improved 
management of defense equipment and supplies through automated 
information and data capture technologies. The private sector has 
leaped forward in using inventory tracking technology to monitor large 
and small products from the time they leave manufacturing facilities 
until they are sold at retail or wholesale stores.
  Adoption and implementation of DOD's Item Unique Identification 
(IUID) policy for serialized asset control will make several asset 
management and supply chain management improvements. Once fully 
implemented, if an item is in the inventory of any DOD facility 
anywhere in the world, it would be easy to locate and deliver where and 
when it is needed. This happens every day in retail settings and it 
should be the standard way DOD inventory is managed. My amendment would 
support the work of the DOD to adopt a proven private sector method for 
more efficiently managing inventory.
  The most advanced warehouse inventory management systems are fully 
automated and biometrically controlled to track items and create 
records of people who make request to transport items from storage to 
use. These systems make sure that persons seeking to move items have 
the authority to do so and that the requests create records that can be 
tracked as well as track the items moved. These fully automated 
warehouses have no staff, but rely upon technology that is designed to 
store and retrieve items in the most cost effective and efficient 
manner possible.
  The automated warehouse systems are in use in the private sector and 
are one of the many innovations that may assist the DOD in improving 
efficiency of equipment management while saving potentially millions of 
dollars in labor and acquisition costs.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #49 requires outreach by the 
DOD to small business concerns owned and controlled by women and 
minorities before conversion of certain functions to contractor 
performance.

[[Page 9071]]

Federal contracting can be an important revenue source for businesses 
of any size. In fiscal year 2011, federal agencies obligated a total of 
around $537 billion in government contracts to businesses. However, 
federal agencies' goal for contracting with women and minority owned 
businesses is five percent.
  The Department of Defense is a major consumer of products and 
services that range from office products to military specific 
equipment. The wide ranges of business opportunities provide ample 
reasons to engage women and minority owned businesses as contractors or 
subcontractors.
  This Amendment requires outreach by the DOD to small business 
concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities before conversion 
of certain functions to contractor performance. Federal contracting can 
be an important revenue source for businesses of any size. In fiscal 
year 2011, federal agencies obligated a total of around $537 billion in 
government contracts to businesses. However, federal agencies' goal for 
contracting with women and minority owned businesses is five percent.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment designated as #95 provides an improved 
management of defense equipment and supplies through automated 
information and data capture technologies. The private sector has 
leaped forward in using inventory tracking technology to monitor large 
and small products from the time they leave manufacturing facilities 
until they are sold at retail or wholesale stores.
  Adoption and implementation of DOD's Item Unique Identification 
(IUID) policy for serialized asset control will make several asset 
management and supply chain management improvements. Once fully 
implemented, if an item is in the inventory of any DOD facility 
anywhere in the world, it would be easy to locate and deliver where and 
when it is needed. This happens every day in retail settings and it 
should be the standard way DOD inventory is managed. My amendment would 
support the work of the DOD to adopt a proven private sector method for 
more efficiently managing inventory.
  The most advanced warehouse inventory management systems are fully 
automated and biometrically controlled to track items and create 
records of people who make request to transport items from storage to 
use. These systems make sure that persons seeking to move items have 
the authority to do so and that the requests create records that can be 
tracked as well as track the items moved. These fully automated 
warehouses have no staff, but rely upon technology that is designed to 
store and retrieve items in the most cost effective and efficient 
manner possible.
  Fully automated warehouse systems, such as the ones operated by 
Genco, are in use in the private sector and are one of the many 
innovations that may assist the DOD in improving efficiency of 
equipment management while saving potentially millions of dollars in 
labor and acquisition costs.
  I urge all members to support these amendments.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Chair, I rise to speak on House consideration of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
  I thank Chairman McKeon, Ranking Member Smith and the Rules 
Committee, and the Armed Services Committee for their work on the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
  The National Defense Authorization Act's purpose is to address the 
threats our nation must deal with not just today, but into the future. 
This makes our work vital to our national interest and it should 
reflect our strong commitment to ensure that the men and women of our 
Armed Services receive the benefits and support that they deserve for 
their faithful service.
  This is the 52nd consecutive National Defense Authorization Act, 
which speaks to the long-term commitment of the Congress and successive 
Administrations to provide for National Defense. This bill encompasses 
a number of initiatives designed to confront sexual assault in the 
military, making more efficient the work of protecting America, 
addresses the mental health needs of men and women in the armed 
services, and extends economic opportunity to small minority and women 
owned businesses.
  We do live in a dangerous world, where threats are not always easily 
identifiable, and our enemies are not bound by borders. The recent 
Boston terrorist attack reminds us of how fragile our nation's security 
could be without a well trained and equipped military.
  The definition of war has changed and with it our understanding about 
what is needed to combat a unique type of enemy that fights under no 
flag or for any nation.
  U.S. Special Operations Command, a vital part of our military, 
provides much of the special skills needed to defend our nation today. 
This legislation continues to build on previous efforts to support 
their important work.
  I am still deeply concerned about the President's authority, as 
stipulated by the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, 
AUMF, to indefinitely detain individuals apprehended in the United 
States--including citizens of the United States--without due process 
and with little independent review or oversight. As a senior member of 
the House Judiciary Committee, I am committed to making sure that the 
Constitution and its protections are enforced. The purpose to defend 
this nation is not just on the grounds of this Capitol, but also the 
foundation that supports the principles of liberty, freedom and 
democratic values.
  The bill includes several provisions that recognize the strain of 
more than a decade of war has placed on our troops and the equipment, 
technology, and tools that they use. It supports a 1.8 percent pay 
raise. I had wanted a 2 percent raise for our troops.
  This Congress must communicate its wholehearted support for the 
security of the nation by addressing mindless cuts created by 
sequestration, the $174.6 billion in operation and maintenance funding 
the bill provides will help mend some of the damage that has been done 
to overused equipment and neglected facilities. It also strengthens our 
ability to confront cyber threats, and provides important authorities 
to protect vital information. The bill also continues to lay the 
foundation for enabling competition in military space launch.
  I am also pleased that so much has occurred to improve the bill 
during its consideration on the House Floor, including the adoption of 
seven amendments that I offered. Combined, these amendments will help 
our military families have access to mental health counseling when 
needed and that contracting opportunities with the Department of 
Defense are extended to women and minority owned businesses. In 
addition, the bill has been improved to include provisions that are 
critically important to women, including provisions to prevent and 
respond to sexual assault and research to combat Triple Negative Breast 
Cancer.
  The bill amended on the House floor now also contains provisions that 
will help secure our borders and make the defense logistics management 
system more efficient.
  Let me discuss briefly the amendments I offered that were adopted by 
the House and included in the final version of the bill.
  Jackson Lee Amendment #1 directs the DoD and NIH to collaborate to 
combat Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The amendment directs the 
Department of Defense to identify specific genetic and molecular 
targets and biomarkers for TNBC.
  Triple Negative Breast Cancer is a term used to describe breast 
cancers whose cells do not have estrogen receptors and progesterone 
receptors, and do not have an excess of the ``HER2'' protein on their 
cell membrane of tumor cells. This makes commonly used test and methods 
to detect breast cancer not as effective.
  This is a serious illness that effects between 10-17 percent of 
female breast cancer patients and this condition is more likely to 
cause death than the most common form of breast cancer. Seventy percent 
of women with metastatic triple negative breast cancer do not live more 
than five years after being diagnosed.
  Jackson Lee Amendment #1 will help to save lives. TNBC 
disproportionately impacts younger women, African American women, 
Hispanic/Latina women, and women with a ``BRCA1'' genetic mutation, 
which is prevalent in Jewish women. TNBC usually affects women under 50 
years of age and makes up more than 30 percent of all breast cancer 
diagnoses in African American. Black women are far more susceptible to 
this dangerous subtype than white or Hispanic women
  Jackson Lee Amendment that #2 directs the Department of Defense to 
post information on sexual assault prevention and response resources 
online for ease of access by men and women in the armed services.
  There is no greater crime that an individual can commit than the 
crime of sexual molestation and sexual assault. The perpetrators of 
these crimes rob victims of their dignity and sense of wellbeing. 
Victimization is not easily relieved by treating the immediate physical 
injuries that may result, but can last for years. Moreover, victims of 
sexual assault are profoundly affected for the rest of their lives 
often with PTSD or other medical conditions. As elected officials, we 
have an obligation to condemn this violence, work for stronger 
enforcement of laws and provide adequate funding for programs to assist 
individuals who may have experienced such abuse.
  In 2012, we know that victims of sexual violence or abuse among 
civilians are routinely under reported. The Defense Department report 
states that of the 26,000 estimated victims only 3,374 crimes were 
reported and just

[[Page 9072]]

302 of the 2,558 incidents pursued by victims were prosecuted.
  Jackson Lee Amendment #2 will make sure that information is available 
and easily accessible to military personnel for the purpose of raising 
awareness, promoting education and the long term goal of influencing 
organizational culture around the issue of sexual violence.
  Many in the military are just learning that there is a huge 
difference between sex and sexual violence. Jackson Lee Amendment #3 
would educate both victims, potential victims, witnesses or victimizers 
that these are acts of violence and should be treated as such. It may 
also help influence thinking among military leaders on the nature of 
these crimes and promote changes in policy to aggressively provide 
support to victims and judicial remedies to prosecute and punish 
criminal behavior.
  Jackson Lee Amendment #4 expresses the sense of the Congress that the 
Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to ensure a sustainable flow 
of qualified mental health counselors to meet the long-term needs of 
members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and their families.
  Houston is home to one of the largest populations of military service 
members and their families in the nation. There are over 200,000 
veterans of military service who live and work in Houston; more than 
13,000 are veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. For the brave men and 
women who have been wounded in combat, help is on the way.
  Although some of a soldier's wounds are invisible to the naked eye 
they are still wounds that should be properly treated. One of the best 
ways to increase access to treatment is to increase the number of 
medical facilities and mental health professionals who are available to 
serve the needs of men and women currently serving and those who have 
become veterans.
  Jackson Lee Amendment #5 will improve the efficiency of the 
management system and how the Department of Defense inventory will 
support modernization that uses technology to tag and track items 
purchased to increase transparency to the agency on what it has and 
where it is located. This change could mean tens of millions in savings 
if implemented DoD wide by reducing labor cost for tracking and moving 
equipment, but more important prevent repurchasing of items that agency 
already owns, but may not be able to locate.
  The private sector has leaped forward in using inventory tracking 
technology and protocols to monitor large and small products from the 
time they leave manufacturing facilities until they are sold at retail 
or wholesale stores.
  The DoD is one of the largest customers for products in the nation 
and should have the benefit of the best knowledge and technology 
available to more efficiently manage its inventory.
  The most advanced warehouse inventory management systems are fully 
automated and biometrically controlled to track items and create 
records of people who make request to transport items from storage to 
use. These systems make sure that persons seeking to move items have 
the authority to do so and that the requests create records that can be 
tracked as well as track the items moved. These fully automated 
warehouses have no staff, but rely upon technology that is designed to 
store and retrieve items in the most cost effective and efficient 
manner possible.
  Jackson Lee Amendment #5 will extend economic opportunity to small 
businesses by requiring DoD to small business concerns owned and 
controlled by women and minorities before conversion of certain 
functions to contractor performance would aid the economy. Federal 
contracting can be an important revenue source for businesses of any 
size. In fiscal year 2011, federal agencies obligated a total of around 
$537 billion in government contracts to businesses. However, federal 
agencies' goal for contracting with women and minority owned businesses 
is five percent.
  The Department of Defense is a major consumer of products and 
services that range from office products to military specific 
equipment. The wide ranges of business opportunities provide ample 
reasons to engage women and minority owned businesses as contractors or 
subcontractors.
  In addition to the Jackson Lee Amendments offered to this bill, I 
joined my Colleagues on the Committee on Homeland Security in 
supporting an amendment to promote collaboration and cooperation 
between the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security 
regarding the identification of equipment, either declared excess, or 
made available to DHS on a long-term loan basis that will help increase 
security along the border.
  I also request that my colleagues support another amendment that I 
joined in sponsoring along with the leadership of the House Committee 
on Homeland Security which would allow the transfer of technology from 
DoD to state and local law enforcement. Before the creation of DHS a 
program was created to facilitate this type of equipment transfer and 
this amendment adds the Secretary of Homeland Security in a 
consultative role in the equipment transfer process. This amendment 
also gives applicants who seek DoD equipment for use in border security 
preference in this statute. This will facilitate expedited transfer of 
equipment that Federal, state and local first responders can use to 
strengthen our border security efforts.
  I do have grave concerns about some features of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. For example this bill assumes 
adoption of the House Budget Resolution framework, which would hurt our 
economy and require draconian cuts to middle-class priorities. This is 
a serious concern for me because of how it would impact my constituents 
in the 18th Congressional District.
  The Administration has communicated that it would veto this bill in 
its current form and I hope that the conference process will resolve 
the issues that are the most troubling like the treatment of the 
Guantanamo detainees. This issue is a mark against everything the 
United States stands for and it is damaging our reputation and 
credibility around the world.
  The detentions should end and people properly processed to other 
facilities or tried in courts of law to address charges or crimes 
against the United States. My hope is that this provision will be 
dropped from the bill as the legislative process goes forward.
  We must continue to direct our efforts as a body to ensure that our 
troops remain the best equipped and prepared military force in the 
world. They are not just soldiers they are sons and daughters, husbands 
and wives, brothers and sisters--they are some of the people we 
represent as members of Congress. Support of them is a sacred 
obligation of Congress both to those who are at risk on battlefields 
and serving as the guard against threats around the world, but they are 
also those who have returned home from war.
  I thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for their work on 
this bill.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.


                    Announcement by the Acting Chair

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, proceedings 
will now resume on those amendments printed in part B of House Report 
113-108 on which further proceedings were postponed, in the following 
order:
  Amendment No. 2 by Mr. Blumenauer of Oregon.
  Amendment No. 3 by Mrs. Lummis of Wyoming.
  Amendment No. 5 by Mr. Coffman of Colorado.
  Amendment No. 9 by Mr. Rigell of Virginia.
  Amendment No. 10 by Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts.
  Amendment No. 11 by Mr. Goodlatte of Virginia.
  Amendment No. 12 by Mr. Smith of Washington.
  The Chair will reduce to 2 minutes the minimum time for any 
electronic vote after the first vote in this series.


               Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon 
(Mr. Blumenauer) on which further proceedings were postponed and on 
which the noes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 106, 
noes 318, not voting 10, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 222]

                               AYES--106

     Amash
     Bass
     Becerra
     Benishek
     Bentivolio
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Braley (IA)
     Capps
     Capuano
     Carson (IN)
     Castor (FL)
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Cohen
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Davis, Danny
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Duncan (TN)
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Eshoo
     Farr
     Foster
     Garamendi
     Griffith (VA)
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Hahn
     Hastings (FL)

[[Page 9073]]


     Higgins
     Himes
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Huffman
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kind
     Labrador
     Lee (CA)
     Lipinski
     Loebsack
     Lofgren
     Lowenthal
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Massie
     Matsui
     McClintock
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McNerney
     Meeks
     Meng
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Mulvaney
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Nolan
     O'Rourke
     Pallone
     Peterson
     Petri
     Polis
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rangel
     Rohrabacher
     Roybal-Allard
     Rush
     Sanford
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schrader
     Sensenbrenner
     Serrano
     Sherman
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Speier
     Stutzman
     Swalwell (CA)
     Thompson (CA)
     Tierney
     Titus
     Van Hollen
     Velazquez
     Walz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Welch
     Wilson (FL)
     Yarmuth
     Yoho

                               NOES--318

     Aderholt
     Alexander
     Amodei
     Andrews
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barber
     Barletta
     Barr
     Barrow (GA)
     Barton
     Beatty
     Bera (CA)
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boustany
     Brady (PA)
     Brady (TX)
     Bridenstine
     Brooks (AL)
     Brooks (IN)
     Broun (GA)
     Brown (FL)
     Brownley (CA)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Burgess
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Calvert
     Camp
     Cantor
     Capito
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carter
     Cartwright
     Cassidy
     Castro (TX)
     Chabot
     Chaffetz
     Cicilline
     Clyburn
     Coble
     Coffman
     Cole
     Collins (GA)
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Connolly
     Cook
     Costa
     Cotton
     Courtney
     Cramer
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Cummings
     Daines
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Rodney
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Denham
     Dent
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Deutch
     Diaz-Balart
     Dingell
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Ellmers
     Engel
     Enyart
     Esty
     Farenthold
     Fincher
     Fitzpatrick
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Frankel (FL)
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Gallego
     Garcia
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gibson
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (GA)
     Graves (MO)
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanabusa
     Hanna
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Heck (WA)
     Hensarling
     Herrera Beutler
     Hinojosa
     Holding
     Hoyer
     Hudson
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Hurt
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson Lee
     Jenkins
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones
     Jordan
     Joyce
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kelly (PA)
     Kilmer
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kirkpatrick
     Kline
     Kuster
     LaMalfa
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Langevin
     Lankford
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     Latta
     Levin
     LoBiondo
     Long
     Lowey
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lummis
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Sean
     Marchant
     Marino
     Matheson
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     Meadows
     Meehan
     Messer
     Mica
     Michaud
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Moran
     Mullin
     Murphy (FL)
     Murphy (PA)
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Paulsen
     Pearce
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Perry
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Pingree (ME)
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Pocan
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Radel
     Rahall
     Reed
     Reichert
     Renacci
     Ribble
     Rice (SC)
     Richmond
     Rigell
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Royce
     Ruiz
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Ryan (OH)
     Ryan (WI)
     Salmon
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Scalise
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schock
     Schwartz
     Schweikert
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, Austin
     Scott, David
     Sessions
     Sewell (AL)
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sinema
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Southerland
     Stewart
     Stivers
     Stockman
     Takano
     Terry
     Thompson (MS)
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tipton
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Upton
     Valadao
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Visclosky
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walorski
     Wasserman Schultz
     Weber (TX)
     Webster (FL)
     Wenstrup
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                             NOT VOTING--10

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Kaptur
     Lewis
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Payne
     Shea-Porter

                              {time}  1734

  Messrs. FRANKS of Arizona, HARPER, GENE GREEN of Texas, LUETKEMEYER, 
BARROW of Georgia, MEADOWS, BISHOP of Utah, CICILLINE, GARCIA, DELANEY, 
UPTON, LARSON of Connecticut, CLYBURN, THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms. 
EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, and Mrs. 
KIRKPATRICK changed their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
  Messrs. STUTZMAN, DOYLE, MEEKS, and Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD changed their 
vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


                 Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mrs. Lummis

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Wyoming 
(Mrs. Lummis) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 235, 
noes 189, not voting 10, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 223]

                               AYES--235

     Aderholt
     Alexander
     Amodei
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barletta
     Barr
     Barton
     Benishek
     Bentivolio
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Bridenstine
     Brooks (AL)
     Brooks (IN)
     Broun (GA)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Burgess
     Calvert
     Camp
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Chaffetz
     Coble
     Coffman
     Cole
     Collins (GA)
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Cook
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Culberson
     Daines
     Davis, Rodney
     Denham
     Dent
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellmers
     Farenthold
     Fincher
     Fitzpatrick
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gibson
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (GA)
     Graves (MO)
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Griffith (VA)
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanna
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Hensarling
     Herrera Beutler
     Holding
     Hudson
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Hurt
     Issa
     Jenkins
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones
     Jordan
     Joyce
     Kelly (PA)
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kline
     Labrador
     LaMalfa
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Lankford
     Latham
     Latta
     LoBiondo
     Long
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lummis
     Marchant
     Marino
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McClintock
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     Meadows
     Meehan
     Messer
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Mullin
     Murphy (PA)
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Palazzo
     Paulsen
     Pearce
     Perry
     Peterson
     Petri
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Radel
     Reed
     Reichert
     Renacci
     Ribble
     Rice (SC)
     Rigell
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Royce
     Ruiz
     Runyan
     Ryan (OH)
     Ryan (WI)
     Salmon
     Sanford
     Scalise
     Schock
     Schweikert
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Sewell (AL)
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Southerland
     Stewart
     Stivers
     Stockman
     Stutzman
     Terry
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tipton
     Turner
     Upton
     Valadao
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walorski
     Weber (TX)
     Webster (FL)
     Wenstrup
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Yoho
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                               NOES--189

     Amash
     Andrews
     Barber
     Barrow (GA)
     Bass
     Beatty
     Becerra
     Bera (CA)
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Brown (FL)
     Brownley (CA)
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Cartwright
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Cicilline
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Connolly

[[Page 9074]]


     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Courtney
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Danny
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Engel
     Enyart
     Eshoo
     Esty
     Farr
     Foster
     Frankel (FL)
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Gallego
     Garamendi
     Garcia
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Grijalva
     Hahn
     Hanabusa
     Hastings (FL)
     Heck (WA)
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinojosa
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Hoyer
     Huffman
     Israel
     Jackson Lee
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kind
     Kirkpatrick
     Kuster
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lipinski
     Loebsack
     Lowenthal
     Lowey
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Maloney, Sean
     Massie
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McNerney
     Meeks
     Meng
     Michaud
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (FL)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Nolan
     O'Rourke
     Owens
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Payne
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Pingree (ME)
     Pocan
     Polis
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Richmond
     Rohrabacher
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Serrano
     Sinema
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (WA)
     Speier
     Swalwell (CA)
     Takano
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Tierney
     Titus
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Van Hollen
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Welch
     Wilson (FL)
     Yarmuth

                             NOT VOTING--10

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Gutierrez
     Lewis
     Lofgren
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Shea-Porter


                    Announcement by the Acting Chair

  The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining.

                              {time}  1739

  Ms. SINEMA changed her vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
  So the amendment was agreed to.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


                 Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Coffman

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado 
(Mr. Coffman) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 206, 
noes 220, not voting 8, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 224]

                               AYES--206

     Alexander
     Amash
     Amodei
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barletta
     Barr
     Barton
     Bentivolio
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Bridenstine
     Brooks (IN)
     Broun (GA)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Burgess
     Calvert
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Cartwright
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Chaffetz
     Coble
     Coffman
     Cole
     Collins (GA)
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Cook
     Cooper
     Costa
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crawford
     Culberson
     Daines
     Davis, Rodney
     Denham
     Dent
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellmers
     Farenthold
     Fincher
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Frankel (FL)
     Franks (AZ)
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (GA)
     Griffin (AR)
     Griffith (VA)
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanna
     Hartzler
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Hensarling
     Himes
     Holding
     Hudson
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hurt
     Issa
     Jenkins
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones
     Jordan
     Kelly (PA)
     King (IA)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kline
     Labrador
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Lankford
     Latham
     Latta
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lummis
     Marchant
     Massie
     Matheson
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McClintock
     McHenry
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     Meadows
     Messer
     Mica
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Mullin
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (PA)
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Paulsen
     Pearce
     Perlmutter
     Petri
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Radel
     Reichert
     Ribble
     Rice (SC)
     Rigell
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Royce
     Runyan
     Ryan (WI)
     Salmon
     Sanford
     Scalise
     Schock
     Schweikert
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Southerland
     Speier
     Stewart
     Stockman
     Stutzman
     Terry
     Thompson (PA)
     Tipton
     Upton
     Valadao
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walorski
     Walz
     Weber (TX)
     Webster (FL)
     Wenstrup
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Yoho
     Young (AK)
     Young (IN)

                               NOES--220

     Aderholt
     Andrews
     Barber
     Barrow (GA)
     Bass
     Beatty
     Becerra
     Benishek
     Bera (CA)
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Brooks (AL)
     Brown (FL)
     Brownley (CA)
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Camp
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Cicilline
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Connolly
     Conyers
     Courtney
     Crenshaw
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Danny
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Engel
     Enyart
     Eshoo
     Esty
     Farr
     Fitzpatrick
     Flores
     Foster
     Frelinghuysen
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Gallego
     Garamendi
     Garcia
     Gibson
     Graves (MO)
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Hahn
     Hanabusa
     Harper
     Harris
     Hastings (FL)
     Heck (WA)
     Herrera Beutler
     Higgins
     Hinojosa
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Hoyer
     Huffman
     Hunter
     Israel
     Jackson Lee
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Joyce
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kind
     King (NY)
     Kirkpatrick
     Kuster
     LaMalfa
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Lofgren
     Long
     Lowenthal
     Lowey
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Maloney, Sean
     Marino
     Matsui
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McIntyre
     McNerney
     Meehan
     Meeks
     Meng
     Michaud
     Miller (FL)
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Murphy (FL)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Nolan
     O'Rourke
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Payne
     Pelosi
     Perry
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Peterson
     Pingree (ME)
     Pocan
     Polis
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Reed
     Renacci
     Richmond
     Rogers (AL)
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruiz
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Serrano
     Sewell (AL)
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sinema
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (WA)
     Stivers
     Swalwell (CA)
     Takano
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tierney
     Titus
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Van Hollen
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Welch
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Wilson (FL)
     Yarmuth
     Young (FL)

                             NOT VOTING--8

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Lewis
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Shea-Porter

                              {time}  1747

  Mr. DeFAZIO changed his vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
  Mr. COLLINS of New York changed his vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


                 Amendment No. 9 Offered by Mr. Rigell

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia 
(Mr. Rigell) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.

[[Page 9075]]

  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 178, 
noes 248, not voting 8, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 225]

                               AYES--178

     Aderholt
     Alexander
     Amash
     Amodei
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barr
     Benishek
     Bentivolio
     Bilirakis
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Brooks (AL)
     Brooks (IN)
     Broun (GA)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Calvert
     Camp
     Cantor
     Carter
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Coble
     Coffman
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Connolly
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crawford
     Culberson
     Daines
     Denham
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellmers
     Fincher
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gibbs
     Goodlatte
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (MO)
     Griffin (AR)
     Griffith (VA)
     Guthrie
     Hanna
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Hensarling
     Herrera Beutler
     Holding
     Hudson
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Hurt
     Jenkins
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, Sam
     Jordan
     Kelly (PA)
     King (IA)
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kline
     Labrador
     LaMalfa
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Latham
     Latta
     Long
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lummis
     Marchant
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McClintock
     McHenry
     McKeon
     McMorris Rodgers
     Meadows
     Messer
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Mulvaney
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Palazzo
     Paulsen
     Perry
     Petri
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Posey
     Radel
     Reed
     Renacci
     Ribble
     Rigell
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Royce
     Ryan (WI)
     Salmon
     Sanford
     Scalise
     Schock
     Schweikert
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (TX)
     Southerland
     Stivers
     Stockman
     Stutzman
     Terry
     Thornberry
     Upton
     Valadao
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walorski
     Weber (TX)
     Webster (FL)
     Wenstrup
     Whitfield
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Yoho
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                               NOES--248

     Andrews
     Barber
     Barletta
     Barrow (GA)
     Barton
     Bass
     Beatty
     Becerra
     Bera (CA)
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Bishop (UT)
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Bridenstine
     Brown (FL)
     Brownley (CA)
     Burgess
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Capito
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Cartwright
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Chaffetz
     Cicilline
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Cole
     Collins (GA)
     Conyers
     Cook
     Cooper
     Costa
     Courtney
     Crenshaw
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Danny
     Davis, Rodney
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Dent
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Engel
     Enyart
     Eshoo
     Esty
     Farenthold
     Farr
     Fitzpatrick
     Forbes
     Foster
     Frankel (FL)
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Gallego
     Garamendi
     Garcia
     Gerlach
     Gibson
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Graves (GA)
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Grijalva
     Grimm
     Gutierrez
     Hahn
     Hall
     Hanabusa
     Hastings (FL)
     Heck (WA)
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinojosa
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Hoyer
     Huffman
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson Lee
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Jones
     Joyce
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kind
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kirkpatrick
     Kuster
     Langevin
     Lankford
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Lofgren
     Lowenthal
     Lowey
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Maloney, Sean
     Marino
     Massie
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McIntyre
     McKinley
     McNerney
     Meehan
     Meeks
     Meng
     Michaud
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Mullin
     Murphy (FL)
     Murphy (PA)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Nolan
     O'Rourke
     Owens
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Payne
     Pearce
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Peterson
     Pingree (ME)
     Pocan
     Polis
     Price (GA)
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Reichert
     Rice (SC)
     Richmond
     Rogers (AL)
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruiz
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, Austin
     Scott, David
     Serrano
     Sewell (AL)
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sinema
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (WA)
     Speier
     Stewart
     Swalwell (CA)
     Takano
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Thompson (PA)
     Tiberi
     Tierney
     Tipton
     Titus
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Van Hollen
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Welch
     Westmoreland
     Wilson (FL)
     Wolf
     Yarmuth
     Young (AK)

                             NOT VOTING--8

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Lewis
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Shea-Porter

                              {time}  1750

  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


                Amendment No. 10 Offered by Mr. McGovern

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from 
Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) on which further proceedings were 
postponed and on which the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 305, 
noes 121, not voting 8, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 226]

                               AYES--305

     Alexander
     Amash
     Amodei
     Andrews
     Bachus
     Barber
     Barton
     Bass
     Beatty
     Becerra
     Benishek
     Bentivolio
     Bera (CA)
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Bonner
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Bridenstine
     Brooks (AL)
     Broun (GA)
     Brownley (CA)
     Buchanan
     Burgess
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Calvert
     Camp
     Capito
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Cartwright
     Cassidy
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Chaffetz
     Cicilline
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Coble
     Coffman
     Cohen
     Cole
     Connolly
     Conyers
     Cook
     Cooper
     Costa
     Courtney
     Crawford
     Crowley
     Cummings
     Daines
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Danny
     Davis, Rodney
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Duffy
     Duncan (TN)
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Engel
     Eshoo
     Esty
     Farr
     Fitzpatrick
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foster
     Frankel (FL)
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Garamendi
     Garcia
     Garrett
     Gibson
     Graves (GA)
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Griffith (VA)
     Grijalva
     Guthrie
     Gutierrez
     Hahn
     Hanabusa
     Hanna
     Harper
     Hartzler
     Hastings (FL)
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Heck (WA)
     Herrera Beutler
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinojosa
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Hoyer
     Huelskamp
     Huffman
     Hultgren
     Hurt
     Israel
     Jackson Lee
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones
     Jordan
     Joyce
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kind
     King (IA)
     Kingston
     Kirkpatrick
     Kline
     Kuster
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Lofgren
     Lowenthal
     Lowey
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lummis
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Maloney, Sean
     Massie
     Matsui
     McClintock
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     McNerney
     Meadows
     Meeks
     Meng
     Mica
     Michaud
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (FL)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Neugebauer
     Nolan
     Nugent
     Nunnelee
     O'Rourke
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Paulsen
     Payne
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Peterson
     Petri
     Pingree (ME)
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Pocan
     Poe (TX)
     Polis
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Reed
     Reichert
     Ribble
     Richmond
     Rigell
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rohrabacher
     Rooney
     Roybal-Allard
     Royce
     Ruiz
     Runyan
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Ryan (WI)
     Salmon
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sanford
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Sensenbrenner
     Serrano
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sinema
     Sires
     Slaughter

[[Page 9076]]


     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (WA)
     Southerland
     Speier
     Stivers
     Swalwell (CA)
     Takano
     Terry
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tierney
     Tipton
     Titus
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Upton
     Valadao
     Van Hollen
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walden
     Walorski
     Walz
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Webster (FL)
     Welch
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Wilson (FL)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yarmuth
     Yoho
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)

                               NOES--121

     Aderholt
     Bachmann
     Barletta
     Barr
     Barrow (GA)
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Brooks (IN)
     Brown (FL)
     Bucshon
     Cantor
     Carter
     Chabot
     Collins (GA)
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crenshaw
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Denham
     Dent
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Duncan (SC)
     Ellmers
     Enyart
     Farenthold
     Fincher
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gallego
     Gardner
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (MO)
     Grimm
     Hall
     Harris
     Hensarling
     Holding
     Hudson
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hunter
     Issa
     Jenkins
     Kelly (PA)
     King (NY)
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Labrador
     LaMalfa
     Lankford
     Latta
     Long
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Marchant
     Marino
     Matheson
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McHenry
     Meehan
     Messer
     Mullin
     Murphy (PA)
     Noem
     Nunes
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Pearce
     Perry
     Pompeo
     Radel
     Renacci
     Rice (SC)
     Roby
     Rogers (MI)
     Rokita
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Ruppersberger
     Scalise
     Schock
     Schweikert
     Scott, Austin
     Sessions
     Sewell (AL)
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (TX)
     Stewart
     Stockman
     Stutzman
     Thompson (PA)
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Weber (TX)
     Wenstrup
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Yoder
     Young (IN)

                             NOT VOTING--8

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Lewis
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Shea-Porter

                              {time}  1754

  So the amendment was agreed to.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


               Amendment No. 11 Offered by Mr. Goodlatte

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia 
(Mr. Goodlatte) on which further proceedings were postponed and on 
which the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 214, 
noes 211, not voting 9, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 227]

                               AYES--214

     Aderholt
     Alexander
     Amodei
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barletta
     Barr
     Barrow (GA)
     Barton
     Benishek
     Bentivolio
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Bridenstine
     Brooks (AL)
     Brooks (IN)
     Broun (GA)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Burgess
     Calvert
     Camp
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Coble
     Coffman
     Cole
     Collins (GA)
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Cook
     Cramer
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Culberson
     Daines
     Davis, Rodney
     Denham
     Dent
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellmers
     Fincher
     Fitzpatrick
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (GA)
     Graves (MO)
     Griffin (AR)
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanna
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Hensarling
     Herrera Beutler
     Holding
     Hudson
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Hurt
     Issa
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, Sam
     Jordan
     Joyce
     Kelly (PA)
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kline
     LaMalfa
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Lankford
     Latham
     Latta
     LoBiondo
     Long
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lummis
     Marchant
     Marino
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McHenry
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     Meadows
     Meehan
     Messer
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Mullin
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (PA)
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Paulsen
     Pearce
     Perry
     Petri
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Poe (TX)
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Rahall
     Reed
     Reichert
     Renacci
     Ribble
     Rice (SC)
     Rigell
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Royce
     Runyan
     Ryan (WI)
     Scalise
     Schock
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Southerland
     Stewart
     Stivers
     Stutzman
     Terry
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tipton
     Turner
     Upton
     Valadao
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walorski
     Weber (TX)
     Webster (FL)
     Wenstrup
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                               NOES--211

     Amash
     Andrews
     Barber
     Bass
     Beatty
     Becerra
     Bera (CA)
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Brown (FL)
     Brownley (CA)
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Cartwright
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Chaffetz
     Cicilline
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Connolly
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Cotton
     Courtney
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Danny
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Engel
     Enyart
     Eshoo
     Esty
     Farenthold
     Farr
     Foster
     Frankel (FL)
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Gallego
     Garamendi
     Garcia
     Gibson
     Gosar
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffith (VA)
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Hahn
     Hanabusa
     Hastings (FL)
     Heck (WA)
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinojosa
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Hoyer
     Huelskamp
     Huffman
     Israel
     Jackson Lee
     Jeffries
     Jenkins
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Jones
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kind
     Kirkpatrick
     Kuster
     Labrador
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lipinski
     Loebsack
     Lofgren
     Lowenthal
     Lowey
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Maloney, Sean
     Massie
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McClintock
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McIntyre
     McNerney
     Meeks
     Meng
     Michaud
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Murphy (FL)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Nolan
     O'Rourke
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Payne
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Peterson
     Pingree (ME)
     Pocan
     Polis
     Pompeo
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Radel
     Rangel
     Richmond
     Rohrabacher
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruiz
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Salmon
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sanford
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Schweikert
     Scott (VA)
     Serrano
     Sewell (AL)
     Sherman
     Sinema
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (WA)
     Speier
     Stockman
     Swalwell (CA)
     Takano
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Tierney
     Titus
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Van Hollen
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Vela
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Welch
     Wilson (FL)
     Yarmuth
     Yoho

                             NOT VOTING--9

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Lewis
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Scott, David
     Shea-Porter

                              {time}  1758

  So the amendment was agreed to.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


          Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Smith of Washington

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington 
(Mr. Smith) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.

[[Page 9077]]

  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 200, 
noes 226, not voting 8, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 228]

                               AYES--200

     Amash
     Andrews
     Barber
     Bass
     Beatty
     Becerra
     Bentivolio
     Bera (CA)
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Bonamici
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Broun (GA)
     Brown (FL)
     Brownley (CA)
     Bustos
     Butterfield
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardenas
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Cartwright
     Castor (FL)
     Castro (TX)
     Cicilline
     Clarke
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Connolly
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Courtney
     Crowley
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis, Danny
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delaney
     DeLauro
     DelBene
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Doyle
     Duckworth
     Duncan (TN)
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Engel
     Enyart
     Eshoo
     Esty
     Farr
     Foster
     Frankel (FL)
     Fudge
     Gabbard
     Garamendi
     Garcia
     Gibson
     Gosar
     Grayson
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffith (VA)
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Hahn
     Hanabusa
     Hastings (FL)
     Heck (WA)
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinojosa
     Holt
     Honda
     Horsford
     Hoyer
     Huelskamp
     Huffman
     Israel
     Jackson Lee
     Jeffries
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Jones
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly (IL)
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilmer
     Kind
     Kirkpatrick
     Kuster
     Labrador
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee (CA)
     Loebsack
     Lofgren
     Lowenthal
     Lowey
     Lujan Grisham (NM)
     Lujan, Ben Ray (NM)
     Lynch
     Maffei
     Maloney, Carolyn
     Massie
     Matsui
     McClintock
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McNerney
     Meeks
     Meng
     Michaud
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Murphy (FL)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Negrete McLeod
     Nolan
     O'Rourke
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Payne
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters (CA)
     Peters (MI)
     Peterson
     Petri
     Pingree (ME)
     Pocan
     Polis
     Posey
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Ribble
     Richmond
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruiz
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanford
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schneider
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Serrano
     Sewell (AL)
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Sinema
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (WA)
     Speier
     Swalwell (CA)
     Takano
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Tierney
     Tipton
     Titus
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Van Hollen
     Vargas
     Veasey
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Welch
     Wilson (FL)
     Yarmuth
     Yoho

                               NOES--226

     Aderholt
     Alexander
     Amodei
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barletta
     Barr
     Barrow (GA)
     Barton
     Benishek
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Bridenstine
     Brooks (AL)
     Brooks (IN)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Burgess
     Calvert
     Camp
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Chaffetz
     Coble
     Coffman
     Cole
     Collins (GA)
     Collins (NY)
     Conaway
     Cook
     Costa
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Daines
     Davis, Rodney
     Denham
     Dent
     DeSantis
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Ellmers
     Farenthold
     Fincher
     Fitzpatrick
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gallego
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (GA)
     Graves (MO)
     Griffin (AR)
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanna
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck (NV)
     Hensarling
     Herrera Beutler
     Holding
     Hudson
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Hurt
     Issa
     Jenkins
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, Sam
     Jordan
     Joyce
     Kelly (PA)
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kline
     LaMalfa
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Lankford
     Latham
     Latta
     Levin
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Long
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lummis
     Maloney, Sean
     Marchant
     Marino
     Matheson
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     Meadows
     Meehan
     Messer
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Mullin
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (PA)
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Paulsen
     Pearce
     Perry
     Pittenger
     Pitts
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Price (GA)
     Radel
     Reed
     Reichert
     Renacci
     Rice (SC)
     Rigell
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross
     Rothfus
     Royce
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Ryan (WI)
     Salmon
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Scalise
     Schock
     Schweikert
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Smith (MO)
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Southerland
     Stewart
     Stivers
     Stockman
     Stutzman
     Terry
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Turner
     Upton
     Valadao
     Vela
     Wagner
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walorski
     Weber (TX)
     Webster (FL)
     Wenstrup
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Williams
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                             NOT VOTING--8

     Campbell
     Chu
     Fattah
     Lewis
     Markey
     McCarthy (NY)
     Neal
     Shea-Porter

                              {time}  1803

  Ms. WATERS and Mr. CUMMINGS changed their vote from ``no'' to 
``aye.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee do now rise.
  The motion was agreed to.
  Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Poe 
of Texas) having assumed the chair, Mr. Simpson, Acting Chair of the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported that 
that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 1960) to 
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military activities 
of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to 
prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for 
other purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that, during further 
consideration of H.R. 1960 pursuant to House Resolution 260, amendments 
14 and 23 printed in part B of House Report 113-108 may be considered 
out of sequence.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Simpson). Is there objection to the 
request of the gentleman from California?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 260 and rule 
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House 
on the state of the Union for the further consideration of the bill, 
H.R. 1960.
  Will the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Poe) kindly assume the chair.

                              {time}  1809


                     In the Committee of the Whole

  Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of 
the bill (H.R. 1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 
for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military 
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal 
year, and for other purposes, with Mr. Poe of Texas (Acting Chair) in 
the chair.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The Acting CHAIR. When the Committee of the Whole rose earlier today, 
the second set of en bloc amendments offered by the gentleman from 
California (Mr. McKeon) had been disposed of.

                              {time}  1810


                 Amendment No. 15 Offered by Mr. Denham

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 15 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. DENHAM. I rise to offer my amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SECTION 530E. AUTHORITY TO ENLIST IN THE ARMED FORCES CERTAIN 
                   ALIENS WHO ARE UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED 
                   STATES AND LEGAL STATUS OF SUCH ENLISTEES BY 
                   REASON OF HONORABLE SERVICE IN THE ARMED 
                   FORCES.

       (a) Certain Aliens Authorized for Enlistment.--Subsection 
     (b)(1) of section 504 of title 10, United States Code, is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
       ``(D) An alien who was unlawfully present in the United 
     States on December 31, 2011, who has been unlawfully and 
     continuously present in the United States since that date, 
     who was younger than 15 years of age on the date the alien 
     intially entered the United States, and who, disregarding 
     such unlawful status, is otherwise eligible for original 
     enlistment in a regular component of the Army, Navy, Air 
     Force, Marine Corps, or

[[Page 9078]]

     Coast Guard under section 505(a) of this title and 
     regulations issued to implement such section.''.
       (b) Conditional Admission to Permanent Residence of Alien 
     Enlistees.--Such section is further amended by adding at the 
     end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) Conditional Admission to Permanent Residence of Alien 
     Enlistees.--(1) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
     adjust the status of an alien described in subsection 
     (b)(1)(D) who enlists in a regular component of the Army, 
     Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard to the status 
     of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence under 
     the provisions of section 249 of the Immigration and 
     Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1259), except that the alien does 
     not have to--
       ``(A) establish that he or she entered the United States 
     prior to January 1, 1972; or
       ``(B) comply with section 212(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 
     1182(e)).
       ``(2) The lawful permanent resident status of an alien 
     described in subsection (b)(1)(D) who enlisted in a regular 
     component of the armed forces and whose status was adjusted 
     under paragraph (1) is automatically rescinded, by operation 
     of law, if the alien is separated from the armed forces under 
     other than honorable conditions before the alien serves the 
     term of enlistment of such alien. Such grounds for rescission 
     are in addition to any other grounds for rescission provided 
     by law. Proof of separation from the armed forces under other 
     than honorable conditions shall be established by a duly 
     authenticated certification from the armed force in which the 
     alien last served.
       ``(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to 
     alter--
       ``(A) the process prescribed by sections 328, 329, and 329A 
     of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1439, 1440, 
     1440-1) by which a person may naturalize through service in 
     the armed forces; or
       ``(B) the qualifications for original enlistment in the 
     armed forces described in section 505(a) of this title and 
     regulations issued to implement such section.''.
       (c) Offset and Delayed Effective Date.--
       (1) Budgetary effects.--Not later than 30 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit 
     to Congress an analysis of the budgetary effects of enactment 
     of this section and a determination regarding whether such 
     enactment would result in an increase in the deficit in the 
     current year, the budget year, or the subsequent nine fiscal 
     years.
       (2) Delayed effective date.--With the exception of 
     paragraph (1), this section and the amendments made by this 
     section shall become effective only upon enactment of an Act 
     referencing this section and the title of which is as 
     follows: ``An Act to provide budgetary treatment of changes 
     to enlistment policies of the Armed Forces.''.
       (d) Clerical Amendments.--
       (1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is 
     amended to read as follows:

     ``Sec. 504. Persons not qualified; citizenship or residency 
       requirements; exceptions''.

       (2) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 31 of such title is amended by striking 
     the item relating to section 504 and inserting the following 
     new item:

``504. Persons not qualified; citizenship or residency requirements; 
              exceptions.''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. Denham) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, thank you for giving me an opportunity to 
speak on behalf of my amendment to authorize the enlistment in the 
Armed Forces of undocumented immigrants who entered the U.S. under 15 
years of age, who entered the country on or before December 31, 2011, 
and who are otherwise qualified for enlistment.
  This amendment will also provide a way for this group of undocumented 
immigrants to be lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent 
residence by reason of their honorable service and sacrifice in the 
United States military.
  As a Nation, we have never made citizenship a requirement for service 
in our Armed Forces. Half of the U.S. military enlistees in the 1840s 
were immigrants, and more than 660,000 military veterans sought 
naturalization between 1862 and 2000.
  Mr. Chairman, I have worn the uniform. I have served with many 
immigrants in Desert Storm and Somalia. My uncle and godfather served 
with immigrants during Vietnam. My grandfather and grandmother served 
in Korea, where Europeans were encouraged to sign up for the United 
States military. Filipinos from 1947 to 2000 were encouraged to sign up 
and serve in the military.
  This is one opportunity for those that have gone to school here, that 
have graduated from high school, that are in our communities, to show 
their ultimate support for this great Nation and are willing to 
sacrifice in support of our country.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield to the gentleman from California 
(Mr. Becerra).
  Mr. BECERRA. Mr. Chairman, I would like to engage the gentleman from 
California in a colloquy, if I may.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington controls the time.
  Mr. BECERRA. I would like to engage in a colloquy with the gentleman 
from California (Mr. Denham), and what I'd like to ask is, in 
conversations that have taken place between Members on this particular 
amendment, there is obviously quite a bit of support on this side of 
the House for legislation that would honor the service of any American, 
including those Americans who have come to this country through no 
fault of their own without documentation, have essentially become 
Americans through their time as youngsters in this country, and then 
wanted to fulfill service to this Nation by applying to serve in our 
Armed Forces.
  This amendment, however, has some flaws in it that make it very 
difficult for the very people that the gentleman is trying to help to 
actually receive the opportunity to serve our country and then be able 
to adjust their status to lawful permanent residents, and ultimately, 
we hope, to become United States citizens.
  There is also a further flaw in the bill that would prevent any part 
of this from ever taking effect unless the gentleman were able to find 
the resources to implement this. As he and I discussed before this 
amendment was put on the floor, that would be very difficult unless we 
were prepared to make some substantial changes to the current funding 
of some very important mandatory programs, including retirement pay for 
our soldiers; TRICARE, which is health care services for our military 
servicemembers; mortgage refinancing for our servicemembers.
  So I would ask the gentleman if the gentleman was intent on pursuing 
this amendment today, or if he was prepared to withdraw and have 
further conversation to see if these flaws could be corrected.
  I would also note that for many of us who have been working for over 
20 years to try to reform a broken immigration system, this is 
certainly one aspect of a broken immigration system that must be fixed. 
There are any number of hardworking individuals in this country who we 
believe, through a comprehensive fix of our broken immigration system, 
would have an opportunity to show all American citizens that they have 
tried to work very hard to earn a chance to become tax-paying American 
citizens.
  So while many of us prefer to be able to deal with all aspects of a 
broken immigration system, this is certainly one that truly needs to be 
dealt with and deserves attention. But this amendment has two very 
substantial flaws, and I would ask the gentleman what his intentions 
are with regard to pursuing this amendment on the floor this evening?
  With the permission of our ranking member, I would ask that Mr. 
Denham be yielded time to respond.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield to the gentleman from California 
(Mr. Denham).
  Mr. DENHAM. In addressing his concern about the cost of this bill, it 
is yet to be defined. It's something that we will need the 
administration to define the cost of, as we would with any bill that 
goes through the appropriations process. We look forward to working not 
only with the gentleman from California on the amendment, but certainly 
working with the administration to define an unknown cost that we are 
realizing today.

[[Page 9079]]


  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have 
remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte).
  Mr. GOODLATTE. I thank the gentleman very much for yielding. I also 
want to tell him how much I appreciate him raising this very important 
issue.
  There is no doubt that individuals brought to the United States as 
young children by their illegal immigrant parents are the most 
sympathetic group of people not lawfully present in the United States 
today, and that is particularly true of those who desire to serve in 
the Armed Forces of the United States. We should embrace these 
individuals whose goal it is to integrate into American society and 
live and work by the rules of our Nation.
  This is an issue that we plan to look at in the Judiciary Committee, 
and so I want to thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Becerra) also 
for raising the issue in the context of our overall efforts to deal 
with immigration reform, and if the gentleman from California would 
withdraw his amendment, I would commit to him to work with him in 
addressing the situation and immigration status of these individuals. 
This should and can be done in the broad spectrum of the entire 
immigration debate, which as you know we are fully engaged in in the 
House Judiciary Committee.
  Mr. DENHAM. I look forward to working with the gentleman, but at this 
time I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I continue to reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. DENHAM. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Diaz-
Balart).
  Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Chairman, actually I rise to thank you, Mr. 
Denham, for bringing up this very important issue. The gentleman 
mentioned historically the great contributions that the folks that he 
mentioned today, people just like that, have made throughout our 
history. Let me tell you, Mr. Denham, you are bringing up an issue 
which I am glad finally someone has brought up, and I know you're going 
to continue to, as you have, show the leadership on this issue that 
you've had from day one.
  I just want to tell you that I'm willing to do whatever I can to be 
of help because I think the issue that you have brought up today is 
essential not only for a group of individuals, but more importantly, 
for the national security interests of the United States. So again, 
thank you, sir, for bringing this up.

                              {time}  1820

  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, do I understand that we have 
the right to close?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is correct.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Becerra).
  Mr. BECERRA. I thank the gentleman for yielding. And I appreciate the 
gentleman from California being willing to withdraw the amendment, and 
certainly appreciate the work of the chairman of the Judiciary 
Committee, Mr. Goodlatte, in proposing that we try to resolve this in 
this Chamber.
  I think we want to make it very clear. As I think every one of my 
colleagues who has spoken on this amendment has said, this is an 
important issue because we have a lot of young Americans who are 
trapped in a situation where they have to live in the shadows. And 
especially for those who wish to provide service to our country in 
uniform, I think all of us believe, if you're willing to give that 
highest calling of service, that we want to be there to be not only 
appreciative of your service, but recognizing the valor involved.
  And so I want to make sure we're very clear. We all support the 
notion of trying to help these young Americans, who are Americans in 
everything but legal title, the opportunity to serve this country. This 
amendment, unfortunately, would not accomplish that if it were to go 
forward, and that's why I think it's so important, as Mr. Goodlatte, 
our chairman of the Judiciary Committee pointed out, that we withdraw 
the amendment and try to make corrections so we can get to the point of 
dealing with immigration reform.
  Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 1\1/2\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. DENHAM. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. 
Coffman).
  Mr. COFFMAN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from California for 
yielding and for bringing up this critical issue.
  My father was a veteran of both World War II and Korea, and he taught 
me, growing up, that there's no greater demonstration of American 
citizenship than serving one's country in the military. And in my 
congressional district, there are a lot of young people who came to 
this country by their parents illegally, who grew up in the United 
States, who went to school here, and who want to serve this country in 
the military. It is the only country that they've known, and so they 
ought to be afforded the right to do that and to demonstrate what is 
the greatest, I think, form of citizenship, and that is service in the 
United States military.
  So I think that this is something that we've got to accomplish as a 
part of comprehensive immigration reform and something, certainly, that 
will make our country a better place.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chair, I continue to reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. DENHAM. Mr. Chairman, let me just finish by saying the precedence 
is here. Legal permanent residents are already serving in our military 
from American Samoa, from Micronesia, from Palau. We have a long 
history of over 660,000 immigrants serving in our military from other 
countries.
  This seems like something that should be a bipartisan, commonsense 
way to address this problem, allowing people to not only be able to 
serve in the military, that great opportunity that they have, but, 
ultimately, the ultimate sacrifice, giving your life for a great 
country like this.
  With that, Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to withdraw my 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is withdrawn.
  There was no objection.


                 Amendment No. 21 Offered by Mr. Turner

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 21 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 79, after line 23, insert the following:

     SEC. 241. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NEGOTIATIONS AFFECTING THE 
                   MISSILE DEFENSES OF THE UNITED STATES.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) On April 15, 2013, the National Security Advisor to the 
     President, Tom Donilon, conveyed a personal letter from 
     President Obama to the President of the Russian Federation, 
     Vladimir Putin.
       (2) Press reports indicate that in this letter the 
     President proposed, ``developing a legally-binding agreement 
     on transparency, which would include exchange of information 
     to confirm that our programs do not pose a threat to each 
     other's deterrence forces,'' through ``a so-called executive 
     agreement, for which [the President] does not need to seek 
     the consent of Congress.''.
       (3) The Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergei Ryabkov, 
     stated in response to the letter that, ``the proposals of the 
     U.S. side on the issue are quite concrete and are related in 
     a certain way to the discussions our countries had at various 
     levels in the past years. And it cannot be said from this 
     point of view that the offers are decorative and not serious. 
     No, I want to emphasize that we are committing to the 
     seriousness of these proposals but we note their 
     insufficiency.''.
       (4) Press reports indicate that the Secretary of the 
     Russian Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, conveyed a 
     response to the letter from President Putin.
       (5) President Obama's proposed deal with Russian President 
     Putin has been kept secret from Congress and the American 
     people.
       (6) The Administration has systematically denied Congress 
     information about past offers of U.S. missile defense 
     concessions to

[[Page 9080]]

     Russia, including written requests from Members of the House 
     of Representatives.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the President should promptly convey to Congress the 
     details of any proposed deals with the Russian Federation 
     concerning the missile defenses or nuclear arms of the United 
     States; and
       (2) the missile defenses of the United States are central 
     to the defense of the homeland from ballistic missile 
     threats, particularly if nuclear deterrence fails, thus such 
     defenses are not something that the President should continue 
     to trade away for the prospects of nuclear arms reductions 
     with Russia, the People's Republic of China, or any other 
     foreign country.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Ohio (Mr. Turner) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, last year I stood here on the House floor 
and I asked the President of the United States to make available to us, 
to Congress and the American public, the details of what I believe is, 
and many have seen is, a secret deal that the President has with the 
Russians concerning the United States missile defense.
  Everyone is very much aware that the President had an open mic 
incident where he didn't expect the American public to hear what he was 
saying when he was meeting in Seoul, South Korea, with then-President 
Medvedev of Russia, and he said to him that he needed some space from 
the Russians.
  He said to him, as we all are familiar with now, ``This is my last 
election,'' Obama told Medvedev during the two-day nuclear summit. He 
said, ``After my election, I will have more flexibility.''
  You don't have to take my word for it. You can see this on YouTube, 
where the President offers the issue of missile defense as one that's 
negotiable with the Russians after he's no longer answering to the 
American public through the election.
  What's troubling is that, as we stood on the House floor and demanded 
the President make public the terms of this secret deal that he was 
talking about with Medvedev, the President didn't make any of those 
details available. But, instead, after the election, with the stroke of 
his pen, abandoned phase IV of his own phased adaptive approach missile 
defense plan that would have provided missile defense protection for 
the United States homeland. It was a portion of the missile defense 
shield that was objected to by the Russians.
  So here we have the President sitting with Medvedev saying wait till 
after the election, I'll have more flexibility, and then subsequent to 
the election, abandoning a portion of the missile defense shield that 
was intended to protect the homeland.
  But what's more troubling is Russian press reports indicate that 
President Putin says that they have received from the United States 
indications of a further deal and further negotiations, further offers 
from this administration to what I believe weaken and diminish our 
missile defense shield.
  The President needs to make these public. We are asking for a sense 
of Congress demanding that the President of the United States make 
public the details of the terms of what he is offering President Putin.
  The President has said he's going to be the most open, most 
transparent administration; and yet this is an area where not only did 
the administration deny negotiations are ongoing, which we know to be 
the case, but he even denies the American public and us the terms of 
those negotiations.
  Our sense of Congress says, Mr. President, make these public.
  As we know, South Korea is incredibly vulnerable to North Korea. Now 
the United States is vulnerable, as North Korea has taken missiles and 
put them on a launch pad. We have Iran that's emerging. We have real 
concerns and threats to the United States. This President should not be 
negotiating away our missile defense shield, especially not in a manner 
that's not open and transparent to the Members of Congress.
  With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I claim time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chair, I'd encourage our colleagues to 
vote ``no'' on this amendment. The amendment implies that the President 
is negotiating some secret deal with Russia that would weaken U.S. 
security for the ideological pursuit of nuclear weapons reductions.
  Now, we know the President has the constitutional power to conduct 
formulations, and Congress has the authority to provide advice and 
consent to ratification and to deny funding for any implementation of 
any treaty. The administration has provided regular briefings and has 
supplied senior State and Defense officials over here to our committee 
and to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and informed us on talks on 
Russia.
  This amendment also is not necessary. The bill already contains 
numerous provisions asking for information on U.S.-Russian missile 
defense cooperation and blocking nuclear weapons reductions. So I'd ask 
my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Ohio has 2 minutes remaining.
  Mr. TURNER. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. 
Bridenstine).
  Mr. BRIDENSTINE. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to support the Turner 
amendment.
  The President, as everybody remembers, told then-Russian President 
Medvedev that we would have more flexibility to cut a secret deal--of 
course, he didn't use the word ``secret,'' but I think we all 
understand that's what it was--on missile defense after the 2012 
elections.
  We also know that the National Security Adviser, Tom Donilon, 
conveyed a letter from the President to Russian President Putin that 
reportedly proposed a missile defense agreement that would avoid 
congressional review and consent. Given this administration's lack of 
transparency, I have no confidence in the President's abilities to 
negotiate on missile defense or on nuclear weapons.
  Mr. Chairman, missile defenses protect our Nation. They protect our 
deployed forces and our allies from attack. Our nuclear deterrent is a 
stabilizing force that promotes restraint and assures our allies of 
security.

                              {time}  1830

  Given our economic and military superiority currently, we have 
military dominance when compared to Russia. I personally don't trust 
this President to negotiate it away. And I think it's important that 
we, as Members of Congress, should have oversight here.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews).
  Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Chairman, I think virtually everyone on our side of 
the aisle in this Chamber would agree that if the President wants to 
submit a treaty, he has to follow the Constitution to get it approved. 
I think all of us should agree that if the President wants to implement 
a so-called executive agreement not subject to treaty confirmation that 
we should vigorously exercise our power of the purse and our oversight 
authority to make sure that that's in the best interest of the American 
people, and if it's not, we shouldn't fund it, as the Constitution 
gives us the prerogative.
  The problem with this amendment is, if it's said that we call on the 
President to give us complete information about what's going on between 
us and Russia, I would vote for it; but I can't vote for an amendment 
that has findings that are hearsay at best and inaccurate at worst.
  But the word ``finding'' in the operation of this institution implies 
that there's been a sober, thorough, and factual inquiry as to what's 
gone on. These findings are pure hearsay. They say that certain Members 
have read newspaper articles. Well, that's interesting, but that's not 
a finding. It then characterizes--characterizes--the President as 
trading away for the prospect of nuclear arms reductions certain

[[Page 9081]]

weapons system or defense systems. And I would really ask anyone on the 
other side if they could cite to us any instance where the President 
has, in fact, made an agreement where he has traded away any defense 
system to the Russians or anyone else. I don't think they can.
  The right vote on this is ``no.'' We should exercise oversight. We 
should not engage in science fiction.
  Mr. TURNER. I yield the balance of my time to the chairman of the 
Strategic Forces Subcommittee, the gentleman from Alabama, Mike Rogers.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Turner 
amendment.
  This administration must be transparent with the Congress on 
negotiating proposals with foreign states, especially on something as 
important to U.S. security as missile defense. Numerous members of the 
HASC, including Chairman McKeon, have written asking questions of DOD 
and the President as to the content of proposals that the 
administration is and may be making with the Russians.
  We see over and over again Russian officials, after visits by U.S. 
officials, referencing proposals that have been made on U.S. missile 
defenses. We know from these press reports that the President is 
proposing ``executive agreements'' and drafting executive orders to 
provide ``legally binding'' constraints on our missile defenses. When 
we, as Members of Congress, ask about these proposals, we're told next 
to nothing.
  It's unacceptable for this administration to stiff-arm the Congress 
when negotiating over U.S. missile defenses. I urge my colleagues to 
vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, again, I would ask my 
colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment.
  We have heard from this side not just the content of this amendment 
being sort of out of whack with reality, but also when we consider 
whether or not it's necessary to commit a case, this is not a necessary 
amendment given the provisions that are already in H.R. 1960.
  So I ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment and yield 
back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio will be 
postponed.


             Amendments En Bloc No. 3 Offered by Mr.McKeon

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments 
en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 3 consisting of amendment Nos. 29, 50, 51, 52, 
55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 68, 71, 75, 80, and 160, 
printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of 
California:


           Amendment No. 29 Offered by Mr. Rigell of Virginia

       Page 317, line 20, strike ``and'' at the end.
       Page 317, line 23, strike the period at the end and insert 
     a semicolon.
       Page 317, insert after line 23 the following new 
     paragraphs:
       (3) by striking subsection (c);
       (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c); and
       (5) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) 
     (as so redesignated) and redesignating paragraph (4) as 
     paragraph (2).


          Amendment No. 50 Offered by Mr. McKeon of California

       Page 136, after line 24, insert the following:

     SEC. 1065. DESIGNATION OF STATE STUDENT CADET CORPS AS 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS.

       Section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (14) as paragraph (15); and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following new 
     paragraph (14):
       ``(14) Any State student cadet corps authorized under State 
     law.''.


           Amendment No. 51 Offered by Mr. Heck of Washington

       Page 170, after line 4, insert the following:

     SEC. 530F. PROOF OF PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE FOR PURPOSES 
                   OF INTEREST RATE LIMITATION UNDER THE 
                   SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

       Section 207(b)(1) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 
     (50 U.S.C. App 527(b)(1)) is amended by inserting after 
     ``calling the servicemember to military service'' the 
     following: ``, or other appropriate indicator of military 
     service, including a certified letter from a commanding 
     officer or information from the Defense Manpower Database 
     Center,''.


           Amendment No. 52 Offered by Mr. Kline of Minnesota

       At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. POLICY ON MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF 
                   GRADUATES OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS.

       (a) Conditions on Use of Test, Assessment, or Screening 
     Tools.--In the case of any test, assessment, or screening 
     tool utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment 
     required by subsection (b) of section 532 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81; 125 Stat. 1403; 10 U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose 
     of identifying persons for recruitment and enlistment in the 
     Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall--
       (1) implement a means for ensuring that graduates of a 
     secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the 
     Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
     7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection 
     (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2012, are required to meet the same 
     standard on the test, assessment, or screening tool; and
       (2) use uniform testing requirements and grading standards.
       (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in section 532(b) of the 
     National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or 
     this section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of 
     Defense or the Secretary of a military department to create 
     or use a different grading standard on any test, assessment, 
     or screening tool utilized for the purpose of identifying 
     graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 
     9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
     1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in 
     subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and 
     enlistment in the Armed Forces.


         Amendment No. 55 Offered by Ms. Velazquez of New York

       At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. MILITARY HAZING PREVENTION OVERSIGHT PANEL.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established a panel to be 
     known as the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel (in 
     this section referred to as the ``Panel'').
       (b) Membership.--The Panel shall be composed of the 
     following members:
       (1) The Secretary of the Army or the Secretary's designee.
       (2) The Secretary of the Navy or the Secretary's designee.
       (3) The Secretary of the Air Force or the Secretary's 
     designee.
       (4) The Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the 
     Coast Guard) or the Secretary's designee.
       (5) Members appointed by the Secretary of Defense from 
     among individuals who are not officers or employees of any 
     government and who have expertise in advocating for--
       (A) women;
       (B) racial or ethnic minorities;
       (C) religious minorities; or
       (D) gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender individuals.
       (c) Duties.--The Panel shall--
       (1) make recommendations to the Secretary concerned (as 
     defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code) 
     on the development of the policies, programs, and procedures 
     to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces; and
       (2) monitor any policies, programs, and procedures in place 
     to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces and make 
     recommendations to the Secretary concerned on ways to improve 
     such policies, programs, and procedures.
       (d) Initial Meeting.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Panel shall hold its 
     initial meeting.
       (e) Meetings.--The Panel shall meet not less than annually.


           Amendment No. 56 Offered by Mrs. Lowey of New York

       At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following:

     SEC. 550A. PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AT MILITARY SERVICE 
                   ACADEMIES.

       The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each of the 
     military service academies adds a section in the ethics 
     curricula of such academies that outlines honor, respect, and 
     character development as such pertain to the issue of 
     preventing sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula 
     shall include a

[[Page 9082]]

     brief history of the problem of sexual assault in the Armed 
     Forces, a definition of sexual assault, information relating 
     to reporting a sexual assault, victims' rights, and dismissal 
     and dishonorable discharge for offenders. Such ethics 
     training shall be provided within 60 days after the initial 
     arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at a military services 
     academy and repeated in annual ethics training requirements.


            Amendment No. 57 Offered by Ms. Pingree of Maine

       At the end of subtitle D of title V of the bill, add the 
     following:

     SEC. 550A. ENSURING AWARENESS OF POLICY TO INSTRUCT VICTIMS 
                   OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SEEKING SECURITY CLEARANCE TO 
                   ANSWER ``NO'' TO QUESTION 21.

       (a) Ensuring Awareness of Policy.--The Secretary of Defense 
     shall inform members of the United States Armed Forces of the 
     policy described in subsection (b)--
       (1) at the earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment 
     and commissioning; and
       (2) during sexual assault awareness training and service 
     member interactions with sexual assault response 
     coordinators.
       (b) Policy Described.--The policy described in this 
     subsection is the policy of instructing an individual to 
     answer ``no'' to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the 
     Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to 
     consultation with a health care professional if--
       (1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and
       (2) the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional 
     or mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual 
     assault.


           Amendment No. 58 Offered by Ms. Lee of California

       At the end of subtitle D of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 550A. REPORT ON POLICIES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING 
                   SERVICE MEMBERS LIVING WITH OR AT RISK OF 
                   CONTRACTING HIV.

       (a) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report 
     on the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the 
     Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive 
     articles, and regulations with regard to service members 
     living with or at risk of contracting HIV.
       (b) Contents.--The report shall include the following:
       (1) An assessment of whether the Uniform Code of Military 
     Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, 
     punitive articles, and regulations are exercised in a way 
     that demonstrates an evidence-based, medically accurate 
     understanding of--
       (A) the multiple factors that lead to HIV transmission;
       (B) the relative risk of HIV transmission routes;
       (C) the associated benefits of treatment and support 
     services for people living with HIV; and
       (D) the impact of HIV-specific policies and regulations on 
     public health and on people living with or at risk of 
     contracting HIV.
       (2) A review of court-martial decisions in recent years 
     preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
       (3) Recommendations for adjustments to the Uniform Code of 
     Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related 
     policies, punitive articles, and regulations, as may be 
     necessary, in order to ensure that policies and regulations 
     regarding service members living with or at risk of 
     contracting HIV are in accordance with a contemporary 
     understanding of HIV transmission routes and associated 
     benefits of treatment.
       (c) Definition of HIV.--In this section, the term ``HIV'' 
     means infection with the human immunodeficiency virus.


        Amendment No. 59 Offered by Ms. DeLauro of Connecticut.

       At the end subtitle D of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. ADDITIONAL MODIFICATION OF ANNUAL DEPARTMENT OF 
                   DEFENSE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING SEXUAL 
                   ASSAULTS AND PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM.

       (a) Additional Elements of Each Report.--Section 1631(b) of 
     the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
     Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4433; 10 U.S.C. 1561 
     note) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     paragraphs:
       ``(11) A description of the implementation of the 
     comprehensive policy on the retention of and access to 
     evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving 
     members of the Armed Forces required to comply with section 
     586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 
     note).
       ``(12) The policies, procedures, and processes implemented 
     by the Secretary concerned to ensure detailed evidence and 
     records are transmitted to the Department of Veterans 
     Affairs, including medical records of sexual assault victims 
     that accurately and completely describe the physical and 
     emotional injuries resulting from a sexual trauma that 
     occurred during active duty service.''.
       (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendment made by this 
     section shall apply beginning with the report regarding 
     sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces 
     required to be submitted by March 1, 2014, under section 1631 
     of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2011.


          Amendment No. 60 Offered by Mr. Cummings of Maryland

       Page 232, after line 18, insert the following:

     SEC. 555. MORTGAGE PROTECTION FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES, SURVIVING SPOUSES, AND CERTAIN VETERANS 
                   AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SERVICEMEMBERS 
                   CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

       (a) Members of the Armed Forces, Surviving Spouses, and 
     Certain Disabled Veterans.--
       (1) In general.--Title III of the Servicemembers Civil 
     Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.) is amended by 
     inserting after section 303A, as added by section 553, the 
     following new section:

     ``SEC. 303B. MORTGAGES AND TRUST DEEDS OF CERTAIN 
                   SERVICEMEMBERS, SURVIVING SPOUSES, AND DISABLED 
                   VETERANS.

       ``(a) Mortgage as Security.--This section applies only to 
     an obligation on real or personal property owned by a covered 
     individual that--
       ``(1) originated at any time and for which the covered 
     individual is still obligated; and
       ``(2) is secured by a mortgage, trust deed, or other 
     security in the nature of a mortgage.
       ``(b) Stay of Proceedings.--
       ``(1) In general.--In accordance with subsection (d)(1), in 
     a judicial action pending or in a nonjudicial action 
     commenced during a covered time period to enforce an 
     obligation described in subsection (a), a court--
       ``(A) may, after a hearing and on its own motion, stay the 
     proceedings until the end of the covered time period; and
       ``(B) shall, upon application by a covered individual, stay 
     the proceedings until the end of the covered time period.
       ``(2) Obligation to stop proceedings.--Upon receipt of 
     notice provided under subsection (d)(1), a mortgagee, 
     trustee, or other creditor seeking to foreclose on real 
     property secured by an obligation covered by this section 
     using any judicial or nonjudicial proceedings shall 
     immediately stop any such proceeding until the end of the 
     covered time period.
       ``(c) Sale or Foreclosure.--A sale, judicial or nonjudicial 
     foreclosure, or seizure of property for a breach of an 
     obligation described in subsection (a) that is not stayed 
     under subsection (b) shall not be valid during a covered time 
     period except--
       ``(1) upon a court order granted before such sale, judicial 
     or nonjudicial foreclosure, or seizure with a return made and 
     approved by the court; or
       ``(2) if made pursuant to an agreement as provided in 
     section 107.
       ``(d) Notice Required.--
       ``(1) In general.--To be covered under this section, a 
     covered individual shall provide to the mortgagee, trustee, 
     or other creditor written notice that such individual is so 
     covered.
       ``(2) Manner.--Written notice under paragraph (1) may be 
     provided electronically.
       ``(3) Time.--Notice provided under paragraph (1) shall be 
     provided during the covered time period.
       ``(4) Contents.--With respect to a servicemember described 
     in subsection (g)(1)(A), notice shall include--
       ``(A) a copy of the servicemember's official military 
     orders, or any notification, certification, or verification 
     from a servicemember's commanding officer that provides 
     evidence of servicemember's eligibility for special pay as 
     described in subsection (g)(1)(A); or
       ``(B) an official notice using a form designed under 
     paragraph (5).
       ``(5) Official forms.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall design 
     and distribute an official Department of Defense form that 
     can be used by an individual to give notice under paragraph 
     (1).
       ``(B) Use of official form not required.--Failure by any 
     individual to use a form designed or distributed under 
     subparagraph (A) to provide notice shall not make such 
     provision of notice invalid.
       ``(e) Aggregate Duration.--The aggregate duration for which 
     a covered individual (except a servicemember described in 
     subsection (g)(1)(A)) may be covered under this section is 
     one year.
       ``(f) Misdemeanor.--A person who knowingly makes or causes 
     to be made a sale, foreclosure, or seizure of property that 
     is prohibited by subsection (c), or who knowingly attempts to 
     do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States 
     Code, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
       ``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) Covered individual.--The term `covered individual' 
     means the following individuals:
       ``(A) A servicemember who is or was eligible for hostile 
     fire or imminent danger special pay under section 310 of 
     title 37, United States Code, during a period of military 
     service.

[[Page 9083]]

       ``(B) A servicemember placed on convalescent status, 
     including a servicemember transferred to the temporary 
     disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 
     10, United States Code.
       ``(C) A veteran who was medically discharged and retired 
     under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, except for 
     a veteran described in section 1207 of such title.
       ``(D) A surviving spouse (as defined in section 101(3) of 
     title 38, United States Code, and in accordance with section 
     103 of such title) of a servicemember who died while in 
     military service if such spouse is the successor in interest 
     to property covered under subsection (a).
       ``(2) Covered time period.--The term `covered time period' 
     means the following time periods:
       ``(A) With respect to a servicemember who is or was 
     eligible for hostile fire or imminent danger special pay 
     under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, during a 
     period of military service, during the period beginning on 
     the first day on which the servicemember is or was eligible 
     for such special pay during such period of military service 
     and ending on the date that is one year after the last day of 
     such period of military service.
       ``(B) With respect to a servicemember described in 
     paragraph (1)(B), during the one-year period beginning on the 
     date on which the servicemember is placed on convalescent 
     status or transferred to the temporary disability retired 
     list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 10, United States 
     Code.
       ``(C) With respect to a veteran described in paragraph 
     (1)(C), during the one-year period beginning on the date of 
     the retirement of such veteran.
       ``(D) With respect to a surviving spouse of a servicemember 
     as described in paragraph (1)(D), during the one-year period 
     beginning on the date on which the spouse receives notice of 
     the death of the servicemember.''.
       (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents in section 
     1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item 
     relating to section 303 the following new item:

``Sec. 303B. Mortgages and trust deeds of certain servicemembers, 
              surviving spouses, and disabled veterans.''.

       (3) Conforming amendment.--Section 107 of the 
     Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 517) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(e) Other Individuals.--For purposes of this section, the 
     term `servicemember' includes any covered individual under 
     section 303B.''.
       (b) Increased Civil Penalties for Mortgage Violations.--
     Paragraph (3) of section 801(b) of the Servicemembers Civil 
     Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 597(b)(3)) is amended to read as 
     follows:
       ``(3) to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil 
     penalty--
       ``(A) with respect to a violation of section 207, 303, or 
     303B regarding real property--
       ``(i) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for a first 
     violation; and
       ``(ii) in an amount not exceeding $220,000 for any 
     subsequent violation; and
       ``(B) with respect to any other violation of this Act--
       ``(i) in an amount not exceeding $55,000 for a first 
     violation; and
       ``(ii) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for any 
     subsequent violation.''.
       (c) Credit Discrimination.--Section 108 of such Act (50 
     U.S.C. App. 518) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``Application by'' and inserting ``(a) 
     Application or Receipt.--Application by''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Eligibility.--In addition to the protections under 
     subsection (a), an individual who is entitled to any right or 
     protection provided under this Act may not be denied or 
     refused credit or be subject to any other action described 
     under paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) solely by 
     reason of such entitlement.''.
       (d) Requirements for Lending Institutions That Are 
     Creditors for Obligations and Liabilities Covered by the 
     Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.--Section 207 of the 
     Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527) is 
     amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections 
     (e) and (f), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
     subsection (d):
       ``(d) Lending Institution Requirements.--
       ``(1) Compliance officers.--Each lending institution 
     subject to the requirements of this section shall designate 
     an employee of the institution as a compliance officer who is 
     responsible for ensuring the institution's compliance with 
     this section and for distributing information to 
     servicemembers whose obligations and liabilities are covered 
     by this section.
       ``(2) Toll-free telephone number.--During any fiscal year, 
     a lending institution subject to the requirements of this 
     section that had annual assets for the preceding fiscal year 
     of $10,000,000,000 or more shall maintain a toll-free 
     telephone number and shall make such telephone number 
     available on the primary Internet website of the 
     institution.''.
       (e) Pension for Certain Veterans Covered by Medicaid Plans 
     for Services Furnished by Nursing Facilities.--Section 
     5503(d)(7) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
     striking ``November 30, 2016'' and inserting ``March 1, 
     2017''.
       (f) Effective Date.--Section 303B of the Servicemembers 
     Civil Relief Act, as added by subsection (a), and the 
     amendments made by this section (other than the amendment 
     made by subsection (e)), shall take effect on the date that 
     is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.


  Amendment No. 61 Offered by Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico

       Page 232, after line 18, insert the following:

     SEC. 555. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RECOGNITION OF DEPENDENTS OF 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO SERVE IN COMBAT 
                   ZONES.

       (a) Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons.--
     Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
     inserting after section 1126 the following new section:

     ``Sec. 1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: 
       eligibility and presentation

       ``(a) Design and Eligibility.--A lapel button, to be known 
     as the dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be 
     designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to 
     identify and recognize the dependent of a member of the armed 
     forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a 
     period of more than 30 days.
       ``(b) Presentation.--The Secretary concerned may authorize 
     the use of appropriated funds to procure dependent-of-a-
     combat-veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their 
     presentation to eligible dependents of members.
       ``(c) Exception to Time-period Requirement.--The 30-day 
     period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the 
     member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the 
     expiration the period.
       ``(d) License to Manufacture and Sell Lapel Buttons.--
     Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the 
     dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this 
     section.
       ``(e) Combat Zone Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `combat zone' has the meaning given that term in section 
     112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
       ``(f) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall issue 
     such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this 
     section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are 
     uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
     item relating to section 1126 the following new item:

       ``1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: 
           eligibility and presentation.''.


          Amendment No. 63 Offered by Mr. Gene Green of Texas

       Page 243, after line 8, insert the following:

     SEC. 568. INTERNET ACCESS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR 
                   FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS SERVING IN COMBAT 
                   ZONES.

       (a) Provision of Internet Access Requirement.--The 
     Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that 
     members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who 
     are deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay or 
     hazardous duty pay is authorized under section 310 or 351 of 
     title 37, United States Code, have reasonable access to the 
     Internet in order to permit the members--
       (1) to engage in video-conferencing and other communication 
     with their families and friends; and
       (2) to enjoy the educational and recreational capabilities 
     of the Internet via websites approved by the Secretary 
     concerned.
       (b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of a military 
     department may waive the requirement imposed by subsection 
     (a) for an area, or for certain time periods in an area, if 
     the Secretary determines that the security environment of the 
     area does not reasonably allow for recreational Internet use.
       (c) No Charge for Access and Use.--Internet access and use 
     shall be provided to members under this section without 
     charge.
       (d) Effective Date.--The requirement imposed by subsection 
     (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2014.


        Amendment No. 65 Offered by Mrs. Blackburn of Tennessee

       At the end of subtitle F of title V, insert the following:

     SEC. 568. REPORT ON THE TROOPS TO TEACHERS PROGRAM.

       Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and House of Representatives a report on the Troops to 
     Teachers program that includes each of the following:
       (1) An evaluation of whether there is a need to broaden 
     eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a 
     bachelor's degree admission into the program and whether the 
     program can be strengthened.
       (2) An evaluation of whether a pilot program should be 
     established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an 
     institutional based award for troops to teachers, as long as 
     any such pilot maximizes benefits to soldiers

[[Page 9084]]

     and minimizes administrative and other overhead costs at the 
     participating academic institutions.


           Amendment No. 66 Offered by Mr. Culberson of Texas

       Page 255, after line 9, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 589. REQUIRED GOLD CONTENT FOR MEDAL OF HONOR.

       (a) Army.--
       (1) Gold content.--Section 3741 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a) 
     Award.--The President''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of 
     Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
       (2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 3754 of such 
     title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     sentence: ``Section 3741(b) of this title shall not apply to 
     the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this 
     section.''.
       (b) Navy.--
       (1) Gold content.--Section 6241 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a) 
     Award.--The President''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of 
     Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
       (2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 6256 of such 
     title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     sentence: ``Section 6241(b) of this title shall not apply to 
     the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this 
     section.''.
       (c) Air Force.--
       (1) Gold content.--Section 8741 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a) 
     Award.--The President''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of 
     Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
       (2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 8754 of such 
     title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     sentence: ``Section 8741(b) of this title shall not apply to 
     the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this 
     section.''.
       (d) Coast Guard.--
       (1) Gold content.--Section 491 of title 14, United States 
     Code, is amended--
       (A) by striking ``The President'' and inserting ``(a) 
     Award.--The President''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(b) Gold Content.--The metal content of the Medal of 
     Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.''.
       (2) Exception for duplicate medal.--Section 504 of such 
     title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     sentence: ``Section 491(b) of this title shall not apply to 
     the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this 
     section.''.
       (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act.


          Amendment No. 68 Offered by Mr. Hunter of California

       At the end of subtitle H of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 589. CONSIDERATION OF SILVER STAR AWARD NOMINATIONS.

       The Secretary of the Army shall consider the nominations 
     for the Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for 
     retired Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes, 
     Gilbert Magallanes, and Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr.


       Amendment No. 71 Offered by Mr. McKinley of West Virginia

       Page 273, after line 10, insert the following:

     SEC. 595. ELECTRONIC TRACKING OF CERTAIN RESERVE DUTY.

       The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic 
     means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed 
     Forces can track their operational active-duty service 
     performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a), 
     12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United 
     States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early 
     retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of 
     active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement 
     credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such 
     title.


           Amendment No. 75 Offered by Mr. Terry of Nebraska

       At the end of title V, add the following new section:

     SEC. 5__. MILITARY SALUTE DURING RECITATION OF PLEDGE OF 
                   ALLEGIANCE BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES NOT 
                   IN UNIFORM AND BY VETERANS.

       Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
     adding at the end the following new sentence: ``Members of 
     the Armed Forces not in uniform and veterans may render the 
     military salute in the manner provided for persons in 
     uniform.''.


           Amendment No. 80 Offered by Mr. Terry of Nebraska

       Page 306, after line 10, insert the following new 
     subsection:
       (f) Additional Report.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     on the methods, as of the date of the report, employed by the 
     military departments to collect charges from third-party 
     payers incurred at military medical treatment facilities, 
     including specific data with respect to the dollar amount of 
     third-party collections that resulted from each method 
     currently being used throughout the military departments. The 
     Secretary shall take into account the results of such report 
     in evaluating the results of the pilot program under 
     subsection (a)(1).


      Amendment No. 160 Offered by Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico

       At the end of subtitle B of title XXXI, insert the 
     following new section:

     SEC. 3123. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY TO 
                   ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
                   RESEARCH PROJECTS.

       Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization 
     Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking 
     ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting ``September 30, 2020''.

  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent that amendment No. 
29 be modified in the form I have placed at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the modification.
  Modification to amendment No. 29 offered by Mr. McKeon of California:

       Page 317, strike lines 15 to 23 and insert the following:
       Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
     Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ``fiscal year 
     2012 or 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 
     or 2015'';
       (2) in subsection (c)--
       (A) by striking ``during fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' in 
     the matter preceding paragraph (1);
       (B) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and redesignating 
     paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), 
     respectively; and
       (C) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking 
     ``fiscal years 2012 and 2013'' and inserting ``fiscal years 
     2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015'';
       (3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``fiscal year 2012 or 
     2013'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or 
     2015''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
       ``(e) Carryover of Reductions Required.--If the reductions 
     required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 
     are not implemented, the amounts remaining for those 
     reductions in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented 
     in fiscal years 2014 and 2015.
       ``(f) Anti-Deficiency Act Violation.--Failure to comply 
     with subsections (a) and (e) shall be considered violations 
     of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code (popularly 
     referred to as the Anti-Deficiency Act).''.

  Mr. McKEON (during the reading). Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous 
consent that the reading of the modification be dispensed with.
  The Acting CHAIR. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman 
from California?
  There was no objection.
  The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is modified.
  There was no objection.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Smith) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I urge the committee to adopt the 
amendments en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the 
majority and the minority.
  At this time, I yield 1 minute to my friend and colleague, the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Culberson).
  Mr. CULBERSON. Mr. Chairman, my amendment No. 66 in the bill is very 
straightforward.
  The Medal of Honor is our Nation's highest award, given only to those 
soldiers who have performed personal acts of valor above and beyond the 
call of duty. The medal has been made of brass. My amendment today 
would ensure that from this day forward, the Medal of Honor be made of 
gold. It's the least we can do for our bravest soldiers who have earned 
America's highest award, and I would move passage.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Cardenas).
  Mr. CARDENAS. Mr. Chairman, I'd also like to thank Chairman McKeon 
and Ranking Member Smith for their

[[Page 9085]]

leadership in bringing this bill to the floor. I also want to thank 
them for allowing me to speak on my amendments, even though they will 
be considered later on today.
  The three amendments that I have offered will strengthen our Nation's 
cybersecurity so we can effectively defend our Nation, economy, and 
innovation.
  We all know that cyber-based terrorism, espionage, computer 
intrusions, and fraud are not going away any time soon. These attacks 
occur far more frequently and far more rapidly and are more 
sophisticated than most people would care to know. Anonymity makes it 
difficult to trace the origin of these attacks and prosecute criminals.
  These attacks are not only intended to steal defense secrets and 
technology, but are also targeted at some of our most critical 
industries. According to a Mandiant study, those industries include 
construction and manufacturing; media, advertisement, and 
entertainment; financial services; health care; food and agriculture; 
and education. This is not only a national security issue but also an 
economic issue as well.
  My first amendment strengthens our preparedness and ability to fend 
off attacks by expanding our understanding of the economic impact of 
cyber intrusions on the U.S. defense industry. It also requires the 
Department of Defense to identify ways to protect our intellectual 
property when attacks occur.
  My second amendment directs the Secretary of Defense to establish an 
outreach and education program to educate small businesses on cyber 
threats and assist them in developing plans to protect intellectual 
property and their networks.
  My third amendment ensures that the comprehensive mission analysis of 
cyber operations mandated in this bill also includes an assessment of 
the retention, recruitment, and management of the cyber workforce.
  The Department of Defense must provide appropriate incentives, 
opportunities, and professional development paths that will encourage 
civilians and servicemembers to enter and hone their technical skills 
that they need to be part of this cyber field.
  These amendments will strengthen our national security, and I urge 
their passage.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Young) for the purpose of a colloquy.
  Mr. YOUNG of Indiana. I thank the distinguished gentleman for 
yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise to commend the Armed Services Committee on their 
excellent work here, and I want to take this opportunity to highlight 
an issue addressed in last year's NDAA which required the Secretary of 
Defense to produce a report this fall that examines an issue of great 
importance.
  During my prior service on the Armed Services Committee, I learned of 
a discrepancy in the law where military facilities closed outside of 
the BRAC process are not given the same indemnification against 
liabilities that are a result of hazardous substances left over from 
any previous DOD activities.
  Several Army ammunition plants were closed outside of the BRAC 
process, and because DOD is not required to maintain responsibility for 
potential problems related to military use, we are hindering 
redevelopment of these properties.

                              {time}  1840

  Last year, I wrote a bill called the Base Redevelopment and 
Indemnification Correction Act, or the BRIC Act, that would extend the 
same BRAC protections to non-BRAC closed facilities. It was included in 
the House-passed NDAA but was removed during conference. However, 
language was adopted that requires a DOD assessment of the status of 
these former defense facilities as well as recommendations to 
facilitate their redevelopment. Local redevelopers should not be held 
responsible for any lingering issues that were a result of DOD 
operations.
  I anticipate the Secretary's report on this matter will provide a 
path forward for these former military installations that remain 
disadvantaged without these important indemnification protections. I 
thank the chairman for his continued support to address this ongoing 
issue and look forward to working with the committee after the report 
is released to address this glaring anomaly.
  I yield to the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. I thank the gentleman.
  Reuse of former military installations is essential for the local 
communities and in many circumstances represents a real opportunity to 
amortize the initial costs of a new development.
  I also look forward to receiving a copy of the Secretary's report and 
I hope it will inform Congress so that we may address this important 
issue in a deliberate and thoughtful manner. I specifically look 
forward to hearing the Secretary's recommendations in dealing with this 
important matter.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Takano).
  Mr. TAKANO. I thank the gentleman from Washington for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise today to express my strong support for the 
amendments submitted by the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Cummings), 
known previously as H.R. 1842, the Military Family Home Protection Act.
  As a member of the Veterans Affairs Committee and the ranking member 
of the Economic Opportunity Subcommittee, taking care of our 
servicemembers and their families is one of my top priorities. This 
legislation does just that: it takes care of our heroes.
  By staying foreclosures when servicemembers are receiving hostile 
fire or when they are medically discharged, by doubling the civil 
penalties for mortgage-related violations, and by prohibiting banks 
from discriminating against servicemembers, veterans or surviving 
spouses, the Military Family Home Protection Act no longer allows our 
heroes and their families to be taken advantage of.
  Since the economic downturn, more than 700 servicemembers have been 
wrongfully foreclosed on, and more than 1,500 servicemembers have been 
subjected to illegal practices by mortgage providers. The men and women 
who fight bravely for our Nation deserve better.
  The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Holding). The time of the gentleman has 
expired.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I yield an additional 15 seconds to the 
gentleman.
  Mr. TAKANO. We owe it to them not to allow their families to be 
thrown out of their houses when they are putting their lives on the 
line in the name of freedom.
  I urge my colleagues to support our military families.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield to the chairman of the Foreign 
Affairs Committee for the purpose of a colloquy.
  Mr. ROYCE. Mr. Chairman, I have a colloquy on an amendment I intend 
to withdraw.
  Mr. Chairman, we are facing a serious and growing national security 
threat in central Africa. Rebel groups, long active in the region, have 
taken on a new form of illicit activity to fill their coffers, and that 
form is poaching. On the black market, ivory from elephant tusks runs 
over $1,000 per kilo. Rhino horns are worth more than their weight in 
gold--$30,000 per pound.
  The black market for wildlife is now in the league of drug smuggling. 
The low risk and high reward of poaching makes it ideal for criminal 
groups, but also for extremist groups. Indeed, groups like the Lord's 
Resistance Army, which the U.S. military is helping Africans to track 
down, and the al Qaeda-linked al-Shabaab are reaping the benefits by 
brutally slaughtering these majestic, defenseless animals.
  These aren't your poor man's poachers either. Many poachers today are 
outfitted with night-vision goggles and sophisticated GPS equipment. 
They fly helicopters, slaughtering these endangered species from above.
  A recent U.N. report cites an increase in advanced weapons used in 
poaching, which can be traced back to the fall of Qadhafi in Libya.
  Earlier this year, testifying on worldwide threats, the head of our 
intelligence community noted that the

[[Page 9086]]

multibillion-dollar industry of illicit wildlife trade ``threats to 
disrupt the rule of law in important countries around the world,'' and 
that this trade involves ``disparate actors--from government and 
military personnel to members of insurgent groups and transnational 
organized crime organizations.''
  Unfortunately, African nations trying to fight off transnational 
poachers lack the capacity to address the problem. With relatively few 
security resources dedicated to combating them, poachers operate 
freely.
  This amendment would have provided authority for the Defense 
Department to advise and assist Africans to suppress this illicit 
wildlife trade. AFRICOM is rightly involved in many of these regions, 
focusing on counterterrorism and on counternarcotics. Since these 
illicit activities are interwoven, this is an ideal area to further our 
cooperation with African partners, helping their stability, our 
security, and the chances that magnificent species aren't extinguished.
  The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield the gentleman 1 additional minute.
  The Acting CHAIR. The chairman's time has expired.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the 
gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Lowey).
  Mrs. LOWEY. Mr. Chairman, the sexual assault epidemic plaguing our 
military has taken hold at the academies, which reported 80 cases of 
sexual assault last year--a 23 percent increase--and these are just the 
cases that were reported. My amendment would require the service 
academies to incorporate sexual assault prevention into their ethics 
curricula.
  Cadets and midshipmen enter academies at an impressionable age. Using 
ethics as an avenue to teach sexual assault prevention can strengthen 
the core messages of honor and respect in character development. It 
would also put discussion of this essential policy at the center of the 
service's culture, which must be changed to stop sexual assault in the 
military.
  I thank the chair and the ranking member for including my amendment 
in the en bloc.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire how much time is remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon) has 5 
minutes remaining on the en bloc amendments.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume, 
and I yield to the gentleman from California to finish when we were so 
rudely interrupted.
  Mr. ROYCE. I thank the gentleman.
  Chairman McKeon, I know you share my concern with this growing 
transnational threat of poaching. And I am hopeful that, looking ahead, 
we can work together to address any concerns that may exist and support 
a more aggressive U.S. commitment to this problem.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I hope you appreciate my weak attempt at 
humor.
  The Acting CHAIR. Indeed.
  Mr. McKEON. I would like to start off first by acknowledging the 
longstanding work that Chairman Royce has done on this issue.
  The gentleman from California spelled out the growing links between 
poaching and terrorist groups in Africa. I share his concern. He is 
also correct that AFRICOM is continuing to engage with our African 
partners in a variety of ways.
  Under Chairman Royce's leadership, I understand that the Foreign 
Affairs Committee will be continuing to look into illegal wildlife 
trafficking in Africa and the national security consequences. I fully 
support that effort. I believe that we should seek a greater 
understanding of the linkages between these illicit activities and find 
an interagency approach to counter this threat.
  The U.S. military has a role to play in countering terrorist groups 
and their networks that would target our national interests in this 
region. So I look forward to our two committees continuing to work 
together.
  Mr. ROYCE. I appreciate the Chairman's comments.
  Mr. McKEON. I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt).
  Mr. HOLT. I thank the gentleman.
  I just wanted to describe two amendments that I have that the 
chairman and the leadership were kind enough to include en bloc.
  I am a member of the United States commission on research and 
development in the intelligence community. I won't go through the whole 
report--in fact, it's being declassified in part now--but we talk about 
the great looming threat to our technological advantage in the 
intelligence arena--the shortage of scientists, engineers, and 
mathematicians.

                              {time}  1850

  I have an amendment directing the Secretary of Defense to report to 
Congress within 60 days from this bill on whether the science, 
mathematics, and research transformation of the SMART scholarship 
program is providing adequate help to undergraduate and graduate 
students to meet our scientific and technical needs.
  Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the Rules Committee making this amendment 
in order, My amendment's purpose is to ensure that the United States 
defense and intelligence communities have the necessary scientific and 
technical talent in the years ahead so that our nation maintains its 
ability to avoid strategic surprise and preserve our technological edge 
against known or potential opponents.
  For the last 18 months, I have served as a member of the United 
States Commission on Research and Development in the Intelligence 
Community. Although the Commission was created in law as part of the 
annual Intelligence Authorization Act passed a decade ago, it was not 
funded and no Commissioners were appointed until the Fiscal Year 2012 
budget was passed. Indeed, funding for the Commission was blocked for 
several years by the then chairman of HPSCI. The Commission did not 
formally start meeting until early 2012. My colleague from Texas, Rep. 
Conaway, is also a member of the Commission, as are Senators Mark 
Warner of Virginia and Dan Coats of Indiana. The balance of the 
commission is made up of former government officials with S&T 
expertise, a former NSC official, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, 
a Wall Street banker, and a university president with a deep scientific 
background, among others.
  Our mandate was to examine the current state of the IC's R&D efforts 
& make recommendations for changes where necessary. Classified and 
unclassified versions of our report were delivered to the House 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence just before Memorial Day, 
and the unclassified version will be released soon, most likely before 
the July 4th holiday. I encourage all Members to take the time to 
review the full classified report at their earliest convenience.
  Because the unclassified version remains under an embargo for the 
moment, I cannot discuss directly our key findings. However, I can and 
will give you this Commissioner's view on the single greatest looming 
threat to our technological advantage in the intelligence arena: a 
potential shortage of scientists, engineers, and mathematicians.
  My amendment seeks to address that potential shortage by directing 
the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress within 60 days of the 
enactment of this bill on whether the Science, Mathematics and Research 
for Transformation or SMART scholarship program is providing the 
necessary number of undergraduate students to meet our scientific and 
technical needs, specifically in the defense and intelligence 
communities. If the Secretary assess that the existing SMART program 
will not be sufficient, he is to make recommendations to Congress on 
what measures would be necessary to ensure our scientific and technical 
talent pipeline is sufficient to meet our projected needs.
  I offer this amendment because I have already seen evidence that such 
an assessment is overdue and urgently needed.
  At a recent cyber briefing on the Hill, CYBERCOM officials told my 
staff that NSA is seeing a marked increase in employees asking to have 
resumes undergo clearance reviews so they can look for other jobs. 
During my own visit to some other NSA facilities in the DC metro area 
last year, I heard from NSA officials that some universities are now 
telling NSA--in writing--that their pay scales

[[Page 9087]]

are not sufficiently competitive. These are warning signs of a 
potential skilled personnel shortage in the S&T components of the IC, 
and the Commission found others as you will see in our report. If 
adopted, this amendment will allow us to take a much needed step 
towards assessing our defense and intelligence personnel needs in the 
areas of science, technology, mathematics and engineering. Accordingly, 
I urge adoption of my amendment.
  I have another amendment that grew out of a suicide tragedy in my 
district. This amendment would allow any State adjutant general to 
request information for any Individual Ready Reserve or any individual 
mobilization augmentee living in the State so that the adjutant general 
can provide suicide prevention and outrage services for such 
Reservists.
  Mr. Chairman, I thank the Rules Committee for making this amendment 
in order. The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that suicide 
outreach and prevention programs reach specific at-risk populations of 
Reservists.
  Sergeant Coleman Bean of East Brunswick, New Jersey did two combat 
tours in Iraq. In between and after those tours, he sought treatment 
for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Because Sgt. Bean was a 
member of the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)--a pool of Reserve 
soldiers not assigned to any unit but available for mobilization if 
needed--he could not get treatment for his condition because the 
Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs refused to take ownership 
of Sgt. Bean and the thousands like him. Since his death in the fall of 
2008, I have worked in a bipartisan way to secure additional funding 
for suicide prevention and outreach services for our active duty, Guard 
and Reserve members, and for our veterans. One component of that 
outreach effort must involve our state National Guard Adjutant 
Generals.
  My amendment would allow any state AG to request contact information 
for any IRR or Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) living in their 
state so that the AG can provide suicide prevention and outreach 
services to such Reservists.
  Within my own state, our extremely successful Vet2Vet and the 
national Vets4Warriors program have been providing peer-to-peer 
counseling services for years. Its success was so great--no 
servicemember who used the program took his or her life--that the 2010 
DoD Task Force on the Prevention of Suicide by Members of the Armed 
Forces recommended that Vet2Vet should be examined as a potential 
national model. In December 2011, the National Guard Bureau decided to 
support a parallel, national program to Vet2Vet, named Vets4Warriors to 
denote its national character, and designated it as the program of 
record for Guard personnel nationwide who were seeking counseling 
services.
  The key reason these programs work so well is that every person who 
takes a call from a servicemember or veteran is also a former 
servicemember. This peer-to-peer connection is vital in building the 
trust necessary to get a soldier or veteran with a problem to open up 
about their experiences, fears, needs and hopes. Both Vet2Vet and 
Vets4Warriors work in direct partnership with the New Jersey Department 
of Military and Veterans Affairs, and thus passing this amendment would 
allow all Adjutant Generals, including New Jersey's, to conduct 
targeted suicide prevention and outreach to IRR and IMA members in 
their states.
  Mr. Chairman, the suicide epidemic sweeping our armed forces can only 
be eliminated if we utilize every tool at our disposal to reach every 
servicemember or veteran who may be at risk. Passing this amendment 
would give us one more such tool, I urge my colleagues to support this 
amendment.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I continue to reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, we have no more speakers on 
the en bloc, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, how much time do I have remaining?
  The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 3\3/4\ minutes.
  Mr. McKEON. Thank you very much. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the 
balance of that time.
  Just an hour ago, the President confirmed chemical weapons, including 
sarin gas, have been used by the Assad regime against Syrian civilians. 
The President has stated that a red line has been crossed. But I would 
observe that red lines are meaningless unless they are backed by 
action.
  The underlying bill reflects a sense of Congress that any red line 
should be backed with substantive measures. The White House stated this 
evening that President Obama agrees with this sentiment.
  Tonight, representatives of the National Security Council stated:

       The President has made the decision to support Syrian 
     opposition. That includes military support.

  I expect to see more details in the coming days from the White House 
and the Department of Defense.
  I am, however, deeply concerned about our ability to honor and uphold 
red lines. Our military readiness and our ability to respond is 
degraded today. Seventeen combat coded Air Force squadrons are grounded 
due to budget cuts. A carrier battle group should be in the Middle 
East, but instead is in port. We just pulled the last A-10 ground 
attack squadron out of Germany because some felt that a forward-
operating presence was unnecessary for a so-called Cold War mission.
  Yet we have an amendment here this evening that would cut $5 billion 
that, in addition to funding the troops in Afghanistan, provides 
support to help alleviate deep readiness problems that are porting our 
ships and grounding our fighter jets.
  Another amendment this evening would strike the very sense of 
Congress that all courses of action, not just military, should be 
considered in Syria and that our red lines must have meaning.
  Reality has overwhelmed both of these proposals.
  To my friends who think there is no risk to ever-deeper cuts, I ask 
you to tell that to the airman and the sailor who may well face down 
Syrian missiles in the coming weeks. To my friends who are 
contemplating further cuts when they vote tomorrow, consider that you 
may be denying that warfighter the hour of training or the piece of 
hardware that means the difference between life and death. None of us 
is comfortable in putting them into harm's way at this time, or in that 
place; but that does not mean that they may not have to go. And that 
does not mean we shouldn't give them all they need.
  Here Congress and the White House agree in principle. Boundaries are 
useless unless they are enforced and resourced.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. KLINE. Mr. Chair, I rise today in support of my bipartisan 
amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act. The Kline-Hunter-
Andrew-Polis amendment ensures the students I serve in Minnesota and 
throughout classrooms around the Nation are treated equally and given 
the same opportunities to enlist in the Armed Forces.
  Currently, students who earn a high school diploma from charter 
schools, home schools, schools that use blended learning models, and 
other means of virtual education are required to score significantly 
higher on the Armed Forces Qualification Test than students enrolled in 
traditional secondary schools.
  This policy, continued by the Department of Defense, disregards 
congressional intent established in the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2012.
  Mr. Chair, as you know it is imperative that the recruiting and 
selection policies for enlistment are not only fair and consistent, but 
also in step with the evolution of the way our nation's students 
achieve a high school diploma.
  Despite studies that show education credential tiers do not 
consistently reflect the attrition patterns of recruits, DOD continues 
to insist where you receive your education is the single best predictor 
of your ability to successfully adapt to service.
  The bipartisan Kline-Hunter-Andrews-Polis amendment would put DOD 
back in line with the law and require them to set recruitment and 
enlistment policies that end this discriminatory requirement.
  As Chairman of the House Committee on Education and Workforce, a 
member of the Armed Services Committee, and a retired Marine Colonel, I 
have a unique and fortunate position to ensure the young men and women 
enlisting in our Armed Forces have the best opportunity to support the 
defense of our nation.
  Mr. Chair, the continuous innovation in education requires the 
adaptation of our recruiting policies. I urge my colleagues to support 
the dream of military service for all patriotic Americans who simply 
want the chance to be able to raise their hand and pledge to defend our 
nation without unnecessary burdens.
  I urge my colleagues to support the Kline-Hunter-Andrews-Polis 
amendment.
  Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of my amendment 
(#63), to the

[[Page 9088]]

National Defense Authorization Act, which would require the Army, Navy, 
Air Force, and Marine Corps to provide free Internet access for 
servicemembers serving in a combat zone.
  This amendment comes as a response to several servicemembers from our 
district who, while serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, found the 
distribution and pricing of recreational Internet usage for 
servicemembers to be unequal and exorbitant.
  For the vast majority of our nation's servicemembers serving 
overseas, the Internet has become the best means to communicate with 
spouses, children, parents, and other loved ones. It is the key link to 
staying connected with home and provides a much needed boost in morale 
for our nation's warriors who have had to endure multiple tours of duty 
in some of the most difficult terrain in the world.
  It is imperative that as the people's elected representatives, we 
make sure that this important service is provided to those who have 
answered the call of duty and are putting their lives in harm's way at 
the lowest cost for our servicemembers.
  For situations in which the local security environment does not allow 
for recreational Internet usage, this amendment provides for a 
temporary waiver.
  I ask for my colleagues to stand with our servicemembers and their 
families and vote in support of my amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.


                  Amendment No. 22 Offered by Mr. Holt

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 22 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. HOLT. I have an amendment at the desk, Mr. Chairman.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Strike page 59, line 15, and all that follows through page 
     72, line 12.
       Strike page 72, line 23, and all that follows through page 
     79, line 23.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from New Jersey (Mr. Holt) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New Jersey.
  Mr. HOLT. I thank the Chair, and I thank the Rules Committee and the 
leadership of the Armed Services Committee for making this amendment in 
order.
  Mr. Chairman, the amendment's purpose is simple: to eliminate the 
missile defense-related portions of the bill with the exception of the 
relatively successful Iron Dome program.
  As some of you may know, I have been involved with arms control 
issues for decades, since I was a part of the U.S. Geneva delegation 
sent to investigate the then-Soviet phased array radar in Krasnoyarsk 
in the early 1980s. My training as a physicist, as well as the decades 
I've spent dealing with these issues, long ago led me to conclude a 
couple of things: effective strategic ballistic missile defense systems 
have not been and are not likely to be technically feasible; and, 
second, attempting to build them only fuels the international arms 
race.
  If you don't believe the latter point, let me quote from a Russian 
Television story on June 8 of this year:

       Russia's Strategic Missile Forces have reported a 
     successful launch of a next-generation ICBM that can 
     supposedly pierce any antiballistic missile system. The test 
     came after the U.S. announced it would resume its ABM program 
     in Europe.

  That is a description of the arms race that should have ended years 
ago.
  The article goes on to quote Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry 
Rogozin who says that the new Russian ICBM was a ``missile defense 
killer. Neither current nor future American missile defense systems 
will be able to prevent that missile from hitting the target dead on.''
  Yes, arms race.
  Just as it has for over 30 years, our continued pursuit of a 
strategic ballistic missile defense system is perpetuating the arms 
race, in this case between the United States and Russia, and would 
perpetuate arms races between the United States and China or others. It 
is also an expense we cannot afford.
  The Missile Defense Agency itself estimates that since fiscal year 
1985, Congress has appropriated $149.5 billion for strategic ballistic 
missile defense programs, and the system has still never been tested 
successfully against any of the kind of real-world threats offered by 
missiles equipped with decoys, jammers, and so on.
  This bill proposes to continue throwing good money after bad, with 
one exception: the tactical Iron Dome missile defense system. Our 
Israeli allies, with funding approved by this Congress and that I have 
supported, and many here have supported, have developed what is 
arguably the best, and certainly most well-tested, tactical missile 
defense system in the world. It is not perfect, and the missile defense 
experts, both here and in Israel, continue to debate the exact kill 
rate, which Israeli officials claim is 84 percent. What is clear is 
that this system is more practical and more immediately useful for the 
defense of Israel than our strategic defense system is for us.
  What my amendment would do is stop the United States from throwing 
more money at a failed, politically destabilizing strategic missile 
defense system and instead would allow continuing funding for further 
development of efforts for Iron Dome and tactical systems like that--
the kind of systems that may help save lives in Israel and save lives 
of deployed American troops should they face opponents like North Korea 
or Iran.
  Accordingly, I urge my colleagues to support this, and I reserve the 
balance of my time.

                              {time}  1900

  Mr. McKEON. I rise to claim time in opposition to the amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield 3 minutes to my 
friend and colleague, the chairman of the Strategic Forces 
Subcommittee, the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Rogers).
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the chairman.
  I rise in vigorous opposition to Mr. Holt's amendment. At a time when 
the technical and strategic case for missile defense has never been 
stronger, the gentleman's amendment would strike bipartisan provisions 
that will improve our missile defenses.
  For example, the amendment would strike a provision the committee 
adopted that would improve the kill assessment capability of the 
Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Why would the gentleman want a 
national missile defense system with a less robust kill assessment 
capability than is technically possible?
  The amendment would strike a provision dealing with an Analysis of 
Alternatives on the future space sensor architecture for our missile 
defense system. Does the gentleman not want an informed judgment and 
study on a persistent overhead space sensor system? The gentleman may 
be laboring under misimpressions of missile defense.
  I know there are so-called ``experts'' in the disarmament community 
who labor to create doubts about our missile defense system, but I ask, 
How many of these ``experts'' have been briefed on what the system 
does, on the incredibly technically demanding tests that the 
warfighters create? I would say none.
  I urge the gentleman to withdraw his amendment, to come get some 
classified briefings; and let's see if we can't add him to the 
overwhelming bipartisan group of policymakers that supports a strong 
and robust national and regional missile defense system.
  With that, Mr. Chairman, I ask the Members to vote ``no.''
  Mr. HOLT. Mr. Chairman, may I ask the time remaining.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New Jersey has 45 seconds 
remaining.
  Mr. HOLT. I thank the Chair.
  I will just quickly say then, in closing, that the desire for a 
strategic missile defense system may be as strong as it ever has been; 
but the demonstrations, the accomplishments of the work

[[Page 9089]]

towards such a system are no further along than they have been for 
decades.
  We can repeal legislation--we could repeal, perhaps, ObamaCare if the 
other side had its way--but we cannot repeal the laws of physics, and 
long experience with this tells me this is a wasteful program. The Iron 
Dome tactical system and systems like that, on the other hand, are 
worth pursuing, and I propose keeping that funding intact.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 3\1/2\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to my friend 
and colleague, the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
  Mr. LAMBORN. I thank the chairman of the full committee. I also 
appreciate what the chairman of the subcommittee, the gentleman from 
Alabama (Mr. Rogers), has said. I totally agree with what he has 
already put forward.
  Against this amendment, I would have to add that one of the other 
things it does which is harmful to our national defense is to stop the 
progress we are making on creating a third site on the eastern coast of 
the United States for missile defense.
  The gentleman quoted some Russian television commentator. That has no 
relevance to what Ground-Based Midcourse Defense is all about. Ground-
Based Midcourse Defense is against a rogue missile fired from a North 
Korea or an Iran or from some country like that or is an accidental 
single launch from another country. It is not to fight against the 
Russians or the Chinese. That's not it at all. We have some 
interceptors already in place in Alaska and in California. The eastern 
site would add that same capability of defense against a rogue missile 
on the east coast.
  I happen to believe that we should be protecting the east coast 
better than we are today. I think the people of New Jersey, let's say, 
deserve just as much protection as the people of California, and we 
have that capability.
  You said it hasn't defeated jammers and decoys. The North Koreans 
don't have jammers and decoys. The Iranians aren't even that far along. 
They're not as far along as the North Koreans.
  We don't have to have the perfect. In this case, the perfect would be 
the enemy of the good. We have had missiles in tests like a bullet 
shooting down a bullet. We have had many successful tests, and we could 
stop a North Korean or an Iranian missile. We have that on the west 
coast. We should have that on the east coast. This Congress in last 
year's NDAA put in language calling for an environmental assessment and 
study of the east coast site. That should go forward. Unfortunately, 
this amendment, should it pass, would stop this progress in its tracks.
  So for that reason and for the reasons already stated by 
Representative Rogers, I would urge a strong ``no.'' This would be 
destructive of missile defense. This would be destructive of our 
national defense. Please vote ``no.''
  Mr. THORNBERRY. I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. HOLT. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New Jersey 
will be postponed.


                Amendment No. 25 Offered by Ms. McCollum

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 25 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of title V, add the following new section:

     SEC. 5__. PROHIBITION ON ARMY NATIONAL GUARD SPONSORSHIPS OF 
                   PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT OR MOTOR 
                   SPORTS.

       Section 503(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
     by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(3) Recruiting and advertising campaigns authorized by 
     paragraphs (1) and (2) or by any other provision of law, 
     including section 561(b) of the Floyd D. Spence National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted 
     into law by Public Law 106-398; 114 Stat. 1654A-129; 10 
     U.S.C. 503 note), for the purposes of branding or marketing 
     of, or promoting enlistment in, the Army National Guard may 
     not include payments for professional wrestling entertainment 
     sponsorships or motor sports sponsorships. Nothing in this 
     paragraph shall be construed to prohibit recruiters from 
     making direct, personal contact with secondary school 
     students and other prospective recruits.''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentlewoman 
from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Minnesota.
  Ms. McCOLLUM. The Army National Guard is spending over $53 million in 
taxpayer funds this year to sponsor World Wrestling Entertainment and 
motor sports racing.
  That's right. At a time of enormous Federal budget deficits, endless 
borrowing from China, sequestration's harming military readiness, and 
deep cuts to services for vulnerable children, seniors and people with 
disabilities, the Army National Guard is spending over $53 million to 
have its logo highlighted at World Wrestling Entertainment events and 
to sponsor NASCAR racing and IndyCar racing. After years of 
congressional debate, the Army National Guard still cannot provide any 
data--zero statistics--to demonstrate anyone has signed a recruiting 
contract as a result of this program.
  This amendment can bring both liberals and Tea Party conservatives 
together. The fact that $53 million in taxpayer funds is going to 
sponsor some of the most violent and sexist entertainment on television 
and NASCAR racing teams that result in zero recruits is a waste of 
money, and it should be stopped.
  As a member of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, over and over 
these past 3 months, our subcommittee has heard from military leaders 
that sequestration is causing a crisis: military readiness is 
diminished; hundreds of thousands of critical civilian Pentagon 
employees are being furloughed; and vital services, like access to 
mental health care, are being cut. In fact, the National Guard 
testified that, because of sequestration, 115,000 traditional National 
Guard forces will not receive their annual medical or dental 
examinations.
  The Guard says: ``This reduction in examinations will bring total 
force medical readiness down by 39 percent.''
  Yet the National Guard can afford to pay one NASCAR race car driver 
$29 million and to pay another driver $14 million for IndyCar racing?
  Clearly, this is a case of misplaced priorities. Congress has to make 
tough choices and smart cuts. Terminating this wasteful, ineffective 
program is an easy choice unless you want to protect government 
handouts to millionaire race car drivers and owners.
  In the past, some of my conservative friends have made the claim that 
cutting this wasteful spending was micromanaging the Pentagon.

                              {time}  1910

  My job is not to protect race car track owners and millionaire race 
car drivers. Cutting government waste and protecting taxpayer dollars 
is not micromanaging. It is our job.
  In recent years, the Army, Navy, and the Marine Corps have all 
terminated NASCAR sponsorships because these sponsorships failed to 
meet their recruiting goals. They're making other more effective 
investments in recruiting dollars.
  The Army is sponsoring high school football, the All-American Bowl. 
That's fantastic. They're also sponsoring robotic competitions to 
engage with and help our young people develop the skills to best 
service our Nation and to serve in the Armed Forces.
  The very best marketing and branding the Army National Guard gets is 
not from a logo on a race car or a violent wrestling performance. It is 
from the lifesaving work that our National

[[Page 9090]]

Guardsmen and -women perform during times of crisis in our communities 
during the floods, during the forest fires, and during national 
disasters.
  I am so proud of the service and sacrifice of the Minnesota National 
Guardsmen and -women who have served our Nation in Kosova, Iraq, 
Afghanistan, and at home in Minnesota over the past decade. They are 
heroes.
  The opponents of my amendment believe that a $29 million taxpayer-
funded logo on a race car results in National Guard recruits and 
reenlistments. Based on what? The National Guard has failed to prove 
any data, no program measures, that this program has resulted in any 
recruits--zero data, zero recruits.
  This Republican Congress is cutting children off of school lunch 
programs and kicking them off of Head Start to save money. This 
Congress is willing to inflict sequestration on our military, and it 
undermines our readiness. This amendment gives Members an opportunity 
to cut real waste.
  Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I claim time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished 
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Hudson).
  Mr. HUDSON. Mr. Chairman, I rise amongst a broad bipartisan coalition 
to oppose this misguided amendment offered by my colleague from 
Minnesota.
  Mr. Chairman, facts are a stubborn thing. The National Guard has 
reiterated time and time again the immense value of their recruiting 
and retention programs in professional motor sports. The facts of this 
program show a successful return on investment for the taxpayers.
  To demonstrate the success of this program, I would like to cite 
three crystal clear numbers which support strong opposition to this 
amendment:
  First, 90 percent. In the June 4 letter to House Appropriations, the 
National Guard Association of the United States and their counterpart, 
the Enlisted Association of the National Guard, stated that a recent 
independent study found that 90 percent of the Army National Guard 
soldiers who enlisted or reenlisted were exposed to the Guard from 
recruiting or retention materials featuring NASCAR drivers and their 
cars. That's a real return on your investment, a return on the invest 
of the American people;
  Second, 85 percent. Of those who enlisted or reenlisted during that 
time period, 85 percent agree that professional sports are beneficial 
to attracting and retaining good soldiers. That's, again, a good return 
on your investment;
  And the last number is 400,000. Since embarking on a more robust use 
of professional sport sponsorships in fiscal year 2007, the Army 
National Guard has added more than 400,000 new soldiers. That, Mr. 
Chairman, is a return on your investment.
  Mr. Chairman, these facts come from sound research and independent 
study which the National Guard has shared with us, and I will enter 
into the Record my remarks here today.
  I submit these facts to my colleagues and encourage them to consider 
the tremendous return on investment we would be stealing from our 
Nation's military and hardworking taxpayers if this amendment were to 
pass. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no.''

         National Guard Association of the United States, Enlisted 
           Association of the National Guard of the United States,
                                                     June 4, 2013.
     Hon. Bill Young,
     Chairman, House Appropriations Committee, Defense 
         Subcommittee, Washington, DC.
     Hon. Pete Visclosky,
     Ranking Member, House Appropriations Committee, Defense 
         Subcommittee, Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman and Ranking Member of the House 
     Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense: As you may be aware, 
     there have been proposals in Congress to restrict the 
     Department of Defense's ability to utilize sports 
     sponsorships as part of recruitment and retention campaigns. 
     We would urge you to oppose any effort to restrict DoD 
     leadership's ability to utilize creative and innovative 
     tactics to ensure that the National Guard is able to promote 
     their career opportunities.
       Recruiting for the all-volunteer force isn't what it used 
     to be. Only one in every four young people today is even 
     eligible to join. Today, you have to know how smart, fit 
     young people think, where they live and play, and go to them. 
     Innovative techniques such as sports sponsorships help the 
     National Guard do just that.
       The enhanced use of sponsorships was a direct response to 
     specific recruiting challenges faced during the height of the 
     wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2006 and 2007, when 
     traditional and more expensive recruiting efforts were 
     failing to attract enough quality applicants. It was during 
     this time period that recruiting goals were reached, partly, 
     by lowering minimum entrance requirements and accepting 
     enlistees who lacked high school diplomas, had low scores on 
     the military's aptitude test, or received waivers for 
     criminal and medical problems. However, since embarking on a 
     more robust use of professional sports sponsorships in fiscal 
     year 2007, the Army National Guard has added more than 
     400,000 new soldiers.
       A recent study has found that 90 percent of Army National 
     Guard soldiers who enlisted or re-enlisted since 2007 were 
     exposed to the Guard through recruiting or retention 
     materials featuring NASCAR cars and/or drivers. Of those who 
     enlisted or re-enlisted during that time period, 85 percent 
     agree that professional sports are beneficial to attracting 
     and retaining good soldiers. The survey also found that 
     racing fans are an especially receptive group for National 
     Guard recruiting. NASCAR enthusiasts aged 18-34, the National 
     Guard's target age demographic, are twice as likely to 
     consider a military career than non-fans.
       For the National Guard, marketing through sports is a 
     direct appeal to our target audience and their influencers, 
     providing the opportunity to reach individuals who are like-
     minded. Any limitations or bans on this may look good on the 
     surface in a tight fiscal environment, but, in reality, it 
     would provide no savings and hinder the National Guard's 
     effort to reach the most qualified potential recruits.
       Sponsorships provide the Guard a national platform to build 
     relationships, promote our image and aid in recruiting 
     efforts. The recruiting and retention dollars spent through 
     sports sponsorships increase the National Guard's prestige 
     and visibility, as well as help generate recruiting leads at 
     events.
       But these sport sponsorships go beyond a race or match. 
     They extend into the community, creating partnerships to 
     develop a national effort to address issues affecting 
     military personnel and their spouses, including providing 
     education assistance, combating unemployment, fostering 
     technology sharing and innovation, and sharing the story of 
     the National Guard.
       Pro sports sponsorships are not just a matter of money. 
     They are an effective and important marketing platform for 
     awareness and development to target future potential 
     recruits, while also working to improve the lives of our 
     Guardsmen and women.
       I ask that you please support the National Guard's 
     continued efforts to partner with professional sports 
     programs and create lasting community partnerships that 
     positively impact our National Guard.
       Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
     Gus Hargett,
       Major General, USA, (Ret.), President, NGAUS.
     John Helbert,
       CSM, ARNG, President, EANGUS.

   New Research: Sports Sponsorships Valuable to Military Recruitment

       New research paints a clear picture of the value 
     sponsorships and marketing around professional sports provide 
     the U.S. military and its efforts to recruit and retain 
     soldiers. Conducted by respected independent firm Alan Newman 
     Research, the empirical study was deployed through a joint 
     initiative by the Enlisted Association of the National Guard 
     of the United States (EANGUS) and the National Guard 
     Association of the United States (NGAUS). The effort surveyed 
     thousands of Americans, including general population, sports 
     fans and, for the first time, more than 1,300 currently 
     serving and retired National Guard soldiers and airmen.


                        NASCAR Drives Recruiting

       The Army National Guard has added more than 400,000 new 
     soldiers since fiscal year 2007 when the Department of 
     Defense embarked on a more robust use of professional sports 
     sponsorships for recruiting purposes. During this time, the 
     National Guard has leveraged NASCAR as a key platform to 
     promote its career opportunities, reporting a three-to-one 
     return on the current sponsorship program while routinely 
     meeting and exceeding recruiting targets. Most recently, the 
     Army National Guard exceeded fiscal-year-to-date 2013 
     accession goal by more than 1,000 recruits (or 104 percent). 
     Ninety percent of Army National Guard soldiers who enlisted 
     or re-enlisted from 2007-2013 said they have been exposed to 
     the Guard through recruiting or retention materials that 
     incorporated NASCAR. Of those who enlisted or re-enlisted 
     since 2007, 85 percent

[[Page 9091]]

     agree that professional sports are beneficial to the National 
     Guard's overall efforts to attract and retain soldiers. More 
     than six of ten of all National Guard respondents have seen 
     NASCAR leveraged at a recruiting center or event.


                   Fans Advocate for Military Careers

       Research confirms the NASCAR audience is tailor-made for 
     programs promoting career opportunities in the U.S. military. 
     Young fans (age 18-34) of NASCAR are twice as likely as non-
     fans in the same age group to consider the military as a 
     career option. In addition, NASCAR fans are more passionate 
     advocates for military careers. They are 20 percent more 
     likely than non-fans to be ``very likely'' to support a 
     friend or family members choice to pursue military service.


                        The Power of Patriotism

       National Guard members consider NASCAR, which hosts 
     swearing-in ceremonies for hundreds of new recruits each 
     year, the most patriotic of all major professional sports. In 
     a powerful statement for recruiting and retention programs 
     that utilize NASCAR, a nearly unanimous 92 percent of 
     National Guard respondents say they are more likely to engage 
     with an organization that they perceive as pathetic over 
     competitors.


                 Americans Support Military Recruitment

       Americans clearly support the ability of the U.S. military 
     to recruit where it sees fit. An overwhelming 83 percent 
     believe military branches should be able to promote career 
     opportunities where the branches feel a receptive audience 
     will be found. Just 12 percent of Americans do not feel that 
     fans of professional sports represent a reasonable target 
     audience for recruiting programs.


                    Opportunities Across Pro Sports

       Nearly all members of the National Guard are avid fans of 
     at least one major professional sport, notably the National 
     Football League, Major League Baseball and NASCAR. Guard 
     soldiers are similarly interested in pro sports in their home 
     areas--such as minor league baseball and hockey, arena 
     football and local short-track racing--indicating 
     opportunities for recruiting and retention programs at the 
     grassroots level in hundreds of communities around the 
     country. A majority of Americans--64 percent--are more likely 
     to engage with organizations that, like the National Guard, 
     are affiliated with a favorite sport, team or athlete.


             Conclusion: Sponsorships Work for the Military

       For the same reasons they are a preferred venue for 
     corporate advertising, NASCAR and other professional sports 
     are a prime place for recruitment advertising due to wide and 
     devoted fan bases and demographics ideal for messaging 
     regarding military careers. For the National Guard, 
     participation in NASCAR allows the opportunity to leverage 
     the largest American spectator sport with a massive and loyal 
     fan base of 75 million. Sports marketing is a widely accepted 
     and important piece of the marketing mix for the most 
     successful brands and organizations in the world, and it 
     should remain so for the U.S. military.

  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  The Army decided to end its 10-year NASCAR sponsorship, calling it 
``not a good investment'' because 5 percent of NASCAR viewers weren't 
even the age for recruitment.
  Let's end this wasteful program. Let's put the money to work to 
recruit and keep a strong military. I ask for the Members to support my 
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Name                  Contract No.          Prime            2013 cost             End date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Army National Guard
 
NASCAR.........................  W9133L08D0100....  LM&O under               $29,962,425  30-Nov-13
                                                     marketing IDIQ.
Indy Race League...............  W9133L08D0100....  LM&O under               $14,496,424  28-Sep-13
                                                     marketing IDIQ.
American Motorcycle Association  W9133L09D0002....  MPSC.............         $3,960,100  17-Oct-13
World Wrestling Entertainment..  W9133L11C0057....  WWE, INC.........         $5,150,000  25-Sep-13
 
    Total......................  .................  .................        $53,568,949
 
                                               Air National Guard
 
MOTOCROSS......................  W9133L-08-D-0100-  Lucas Oil........           $380,000  30-Sep-13
                                  0092.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished 
gentlelady from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx).
  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding and for 
his leadership on this issue.
  NASCAR is a vital part of the National Guard's outreach to young 
Americans. NASCAR fans between the age of 18 and 34 are twice as likely 
as their peers to consider the military. Their fellow fans are more 
likely to support their friends and family members choosing the 
military as a career option.
  Advertising through NASCAR gives the military a cost-effective way to 
reach 75 million patriotic fans. That's why it is has reported a 3-to-1 
return on the program's investment.
  NASCAR support of the military goes beyond mere sponsorship 
opportunities. NASCAR holds swearing in ceremonies for hundreds of new 
recruits each year, giving the fans a real-life example of the 
patriotism they support. NASCAR is a real part of hundreds of American 
communities.
  The National Guard has chosen to use its limited recruiting budget 
through the means it feels are most effective. We should not force it 
to turn its back on a proven means of leveraging that budget and 
introducing millions of potential heroes to their opportunity to serve.
  I urge my fellow Americans to oppose this amendment and thank the 
chairman for the opportunity to speak.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Collins).
  Mr. COLLINS of New York. Mr. Chairman, this amendment wrongly targets 
one of our best recruiting practices of the National Guard.
  Motor sports sponsorship programs have helped the Guard add 400,000 
new citizen soldiers since it was begun in 2007, many of whom were 
sworn in right at the track. Why would we want to cut something that's 
working?
  Every season, the National Guard emblem is seen by millions on the 
hood of Dale Earnhardt, Jr.'s car, one of the most popular drivers 
during the last 10 years.
  Since the National Guard is prohibited from advertising on broadcast 
television, motor sports sponsorships are one of the few ways the Guard 
can market to a national audience while still interacting with local 
communities.
  This amendment takes a strong program proven valuable to our military 
readiness and arbitrarily cuts it for the sake of political posturing. 
This amendment does not save any money. It does not address any 
government excess or impropriety. It unnecessarily attacks our National 
Guard, and it shackles their best opportunity to recruit and retain the 
very best for national security.
  As in the previous two defense authorization acts, I urge Members to 
hold strong and continue to oppose this amendment.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished 
subcommittee chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, Mr. Rogers 
of Alabama.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the chairman.
  I rise in strong opposition to the McCollum amendment. The McCollum 
amendment would prohibit the Army National Guard from sponsoring and 
advertising in professional motor sports. This amendment would have a 
negative impact on the recruiting of soldiers to enlist or reenlist in 
the National Guard.
  Recent studies have shown that around 90 percent of the Army National 
Guard soldiers who enlisted or reenlisted since 2007 were exposed to 
this form of advertising. Additionally, these creative advertising 
techniques reach a sport with over 75 million loyal viewers, many of 
whom are between the age of 18 and 34 years old, the target audience to 
recruit quality soldiers for the Army National Guard.
  I fully recognize the need for Congress to cut unnecessary spending, 
and I have voted many times to rein in government spending; however, I 
see no

[[Page 9092]]

need to prohibit this successful form of advertising which works to 
recruit quality men and women to help protect and defend our Nation.
  I urge a ``no'' vote on McCollum amendment No. 25.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Minnesota 
will be postponed.
  The Chair understands that amendment No. 28 will not be offered.


                 Amendment No. 32 Offered by Mr. Nolan

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 32 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Chairman, I offer the amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       At the end of subtitle A of title X, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 10_. ACROSS-THE-BOARD FUNDING REDUCTION.

       Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables 
     in division D, the total amount authorized to be appropriated 
     in this Act is hereby reduced by 9.4 percent.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Minnesota (Mr. Nolan) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Minnesota.

                              {time}  1920

  Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Chairman, I rise today on a matter of the highest priority 
critical to the future of our great Nation and our people. It is time 
to put an end to the wars of choice and nation-building abroad, and to 
start rebuilding America. Daily we are reminded of our Nation's fiscal 
crises, massive deficits, and unemployment, and shortage of revenue for 
the things that we know we need to do. The simple truth is, the 
trillions of dollars spent on the wars of choice and nation-building 
abroad are the primary cause of our current financial crises, not 
Social Security and Medicare as some would have us believe.
  The sad fact is our own bridges are falling down. Our infrastructure 
is crumbling, and our education system is struggling, while millions 
more middle class men and women are unemployed or underemployed.
  Mr. Chairman, I strongly support a strong national defense, but I 
also agree completely with my Republican colleague, Congressman Mo 
Brooks of Alabama, who recently said:

       I don't believe America can financially afford to be the 
     police cop on every street corner in the world. We no longer 
     have the financial resources to do that.

  In fact, the $652 billion we spent on the military last year amounts 
to 57 percent of our discretionary budget. Mind you, education is at 6 
percent; agriculture at 1 percent; transportation at 2 percent.
  Moreover, that $652 billion spent last year accounts for more than 
the next 10-largest military budgets in the world combined--China, 
Russia, U.K., Japan, France, Saudi, India, Germany, Italy, Brazil--we 
spent more than all of them combined. This $60 billion cut that is 
proposed in this amendment, or a 9.4 percent cut that I propose, is not 
an unreasonable amount. In fact, it is exactly the same amount the 
Commission on Wartime Contracting estimates to have been wasted through 
fraud and abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  Understand that my amendment is not an across-the-board cut from 
every line item as in sequestration, which makes no sense at all. My 
proposed cut is a cut from the bottom line that would give the 
Appropriations Committee the authority to decide where the cuts can 
most prudently be made. And to me, those categories are crystal clear. 
We want to cut our excessive network of military bases in every nook 
and cranny of the world. We need to cut the failed infrastructure and 
investments in nation-building abroad. We need to cut assistance to the 
armed combatants in every sectional and civil war in the world. We need 
to cut discretionary funds to initiate new programs not authorized by 
the Congress. We need to cut funds for the extravagant compensation of 
CEOs for giant defense contractors. We need to cut military weapons 
systems that were not requested by our military. We need to cut funds 
maintaining unnecessary facilities in Guantanamo, and we need to cut 
funding maintaining out-of-date weapons systems and naval vessels.
  Now, let me be clear where we must not cut. We must not cut veterans 
benefits. We must not cut the National Guard. It's our most efficient 
bang for the dollar that we get in our national defense. We must not 
cut compensation to soldiers and their families. We must not cut 
assistance to Israel and our other strategic allies. We should not cut 
funds to the teams and other elite units that can respond to crises 
abroad. And we cannot cut efforts to fund reform of military justice 
and reduce sexual assaults in the military.
  Moreover, it is my recommendation that the savings achieved here can 
be used for deficit reduction and used for investment in our own 
infrastructure--our roads, our bridges, our ports, our education, and 
the unmet human development needs in this country. We can use this 
money to improve the quality of American lives, to stimulate our 
economy, to strengthen our power as a Nation, and to help restore 
America's confidence in the future.
  Finally, Mr. Chairman, my amendment is entirely consistent with the 
spirit of the bipartisan Budget Control Act of 2011, which recommended 
$1 trillion in defense cuts over the next decade, and consistent as 
well with the significant cuts recommended across the spectrum by 
liberal policy groups such as the Center for American Progress, as well 
as conservative and libertarian groups.
  Mr. Chairman, we all support a strong national defense. We support 
our troops, and we are committed to our veterans. This amendment is not 
politics, it is commonsense economics.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. I yield myself 2 minutes.
  Mr. Chairman, in some ways I admire the gentleman from Minnesota 
because he states clearly what he believes. In my opinion, his 
argument, however, is dangerous, and it will mean a very much more 
dangerous world for the United States and many of the people around the 
world who depend upon us.
  If we're going to talk numbers, we ought to just remind everybody 
that in 1960 the defense budget was about half of the total budget of 
the United States Government. Today, it's 17 percent of the budget for 
the United States budget. Now it's true it's most of the discretionary 
spending, but that completely leaves out the entitlements or the 
mandatory spending programs which are a vast majority of the 
government.
  In more recent history, let's think about that defense already took a 
reduction of $487 billion over a 10-year period. In the current fiscal 
year, it was cut another $55 billion. And now this amendment would take 
another $60 billion on top of that.
  Mr. Chairman, I think defense has been cut enough. If anyone has been 
listening to some of the debates we've been having today, you'd hear 
about readiness being down, about training not occurring, and about 
more expensive procurements because we can't buy at the most efficient 
rate. And this amendment would take another $60 billion on top of the 
other things, and would include the personnel accounts which were 
exempt under sequestration.
  But the ironic thing, Mr. Chairman, is that after you take this $60 
billion out of defense, it would get hit again once sequestration kicks 
in. So in effect this doubles the cuts that come on defense from 
sequestration. It is mistaken. It is tragically mistaken, and I think 
it should be rejected.

[[Page 9093]]

  Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from 
Alabama (Mr. Rogers).
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I never ceased to be amazed in 
this Chamber. The only time I see my colleagues on the other side of 
the aisle concerned about fiscal restraint and cutting spending is when 
it comes to national defense. You know, one of the most knuckle-headed 
things this Congress has done is the sequestration framework that I, 
unfortunately, was a part of setting into place. But as you just heard 
my colleague from Texas state, we had already cut $480 billion out of 
defense before sequestration comes into play. Now we have sequestration 
coming into play.
  The thought that we could be in a war, defend against potential areas 
of war that are emerging around the world with further cuts is mindless 
and irresponsible. We owe it to the men and women in this country who 
serve in uniform and their families to make sure they have everything 
they need to be safe and successful when we send them into a theater of 
war.
  This amendment is dangerous, and I urge my colleagues to reject it.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  I appreciate my colleague from Alabama and I would just conclude with 
two points. One, is that it is in the Constitution where it clearly 
provides that a primary, and I believe the primary responsibility of 
the Federal Government, is to defend the country. You can't do that on 
the cheap. Obviously, you have to be efficient. You shouldn't waste 
money, but the first job of the Federal Government is to defend the 
country.

                              {time}  1930

  The second point I'd want to make is this: there are some people who 
seem to want to stick their head in the sand and believe that all the 
threats have gone away.
  As a matter of fact, the President seemed to say a few weeks ago in 
his speech that the war on terrorism was over. And then today, the 
President acknowledges that there is evidence that is clear, at least 
in his mind, that chemical weapons have been used in Syria.
  So, whether you think about al Qaeda and its affiliates spreading out 
all over the world or whether you think about the very real dangers of 
chemical weapons in Syria, not just being used against Syrians, but 
potentially getting in the hands of terrorists and being used against 
us, or whether you think about the new domain of warfare, which is 
cybersecurity, or warfare in space, whether you think about the 
potential military rise of China and what that means for the United 
States and its interests, as you just wrap your mind around the 
headlines and the news of the world, my point is, the threats have not 
gone away. This is a dangerous world.
  Only the United States is a super power to maintain stability and to 
protect the lives and freedoms of Americans. That takes some resources.
  We've already cut defense. We've already cut defense enough, and 
certainly, we should not cut defense again.
  This amendment, as I say, Mr. Chairman, is dangerous. It should be 
rejected.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Nolan).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. NOLAN. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Minnesota 
will be postponed.


           Amendments En Bloc No. 4 Offered by Mr. Thornberry

  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, as a designee of the chairman, and 
pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 4 consisting of amendment Nos. 64, 67, 69, 70, 
72, 74, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83, 102, 107, and 126, printed in House Report 
No. 113-108, offered by Mr. Thornberry of Texas:


         Amendment No. 64 Offered by Mr. Andrews of New Jersey

       At the end of subtitle F of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF 
                   REQUIRING AUTOMATIC OPERATION OF CURRENT 
                   PROHIBITION ON ACCRUAL OF INTEREST ON DIRECT 
                   STUDENT LOANS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
                   FORCES.

       Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with 
     relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to Congress a report 
     addressing the following:
       (1) Whether application of the benefits provided under 
     section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
     1087e(o)) could occur automatically for members of the Armed 
     Forces eligible for the benefits.
       (2) How the Department of Defense would implement the 
     automatic operation of the current prohibition on the accrual 
     of interest on direct student loans of certain members, 
     including the Federal agencies with which the Department of 
     Defense would coordinate.
       (3) If the Secretary determines that automatic operation is 
     not feasible, an explanation of the reasons for that 
     determination.


          Amendment No. 67 Offered by Mrs. Bustos of Illinois

       At the end of subtitle H of title V (page 255, after line 
     9), insert the following new section:

     SEC. 589. REPORT ON ARMY REVIEW, FINDINGS, AND ACTIONS 
                   PERTAINING TO MEDAL OF HONOR NOMINATION OF 
                   CAPTAIN WILLIAM L. ALBRACHT.

       Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the 
     Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a 
     report describing the Army's review, findings, and actions 
     pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain 
     William L. Albracht. The report shall account for all 
     evidence submitted with regard to the case.


          Amendment No. 69 Offered by Ms. Esty of Connecticut

       At the end of subtitle H of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 5__. REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS.

       (a) Prompt Replacement Required; Annual Report.--Section 
     1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
     subsections:
       ``(b) Prompt Replacement Required.--When a request for the 
     replacement of a military decoration is received under this 
     section or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this 
     title, the Secretary concerned shall ensure that--
       ``(1) all actions to be taken with respect to the request, 
     including verification of the service record of the recipient 
     of the military decoration, are completed within one year; 
     and
       ``(2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the 
     person requesting the replacement military decoration within 
     60 days after verification of the service record.
       ``(c) Annual Report.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit 
     to the congressional defense committees an annual report 
     regarding compliance by the military departments with the 
     performance standards imposed by subsection (b). Each report 
     shall include--
       ``(1) for the one-year period covered by the report--
       ``(A) the average number of days it took to verify the 
     service record and entitlement of members and former members 
     of the armed forces for replacement military decorations;
       ``(B) the average number of days between receipt of a 
     request and the date on which the replacement military 
     decoration was mailed; and
       ``(C) the average number of days between verification of a 
     service record and the date on which the replacement military 
     decoration was mailed; and
       ``(2) an estimate of the funds necessary for the next 
     fiscal year to meet or exceed such performance standards.''.
       (b) Plan Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in 
     section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a plan to 
     implement the amendments made by subsection (a), including an 
     estimate of the funds necessary for fiscal year 2015 to meet 
     or exceed the performance standards imposed by such 
     amendments.


           Amendment No. 70 Offered by Mr. Kind of Wisconsin

       At the end of subtitle H of title V, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 589. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO 
                   FIRST LIEUTENANT ALONZO H. CUSHING FOR ACTS OF 
                   VALOR DURING THE CIVIL WAR.

       (a) Authorization.--Subject to subsection (c), 
     notwithstanding the time limitations

[[Page 9094]]

     specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or 
     any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of 
     certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the 
     President is authorized and requested to award the Medal of 
     Honor under section 3741 of such title to then First 
     Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for conspicuous acts of 
     gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life and beyond the 
     call of duty in the Civil War, as described in subsection 
     (b).
       (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to 
     in subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant 
     Alonzo H. Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United 
     States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg, 
     Pennsylvania, on July 3, 1863, during the American Civil War.
       (c) Report Submission.--Subsection (a) shall take effect 
     upon receipt by the Committees on Armed Services of the 
     Senate and House of Representatives of the report, as 
     required in House Report 112-705, providing information on 
     the process and materials used by review boards for the 
     consideration of Medal of Honor recommendations for acts of 
     heroism that occurred during the Civil War.


        Amendment No. 72 Offered by Mrs. Kirkpatrick of Arizona

       Page 273, after line 10, insert the following:

     SEC. 595. PROVISION OF SERVICE RECORDS.

       (a) In General.--In accordance with subsection (b), the 
     Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered records of each 
     member of the Armed Forces available to the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
       (b) Timeline.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 
     the covered records of members are made available to the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs as follows:
       (1) With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who was 
     discharged or released from the Armed Forces during the 
     period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on the day 
     before the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 
     120 days after the date of such discharge or release.
       (2) With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who is 
     discharged or released from the Armed Forces on or after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 90 days 
     after the date of such discharge or release.
       (c) Certification.--For each member of the Armed Forces 
     whose covered records are made available under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary of Defense shall transmit to the Secretary 
     of Veterans Affairs a letter certifying that--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense thoroughly reviewed the 
     records of the member;
       (2) the information provided in the covered records of such 
     member is complete as of the date of the letter;
       (3) no other information that should be included in such 
     covered records exist as of such date; and
       (4) if other information is later discovered--
       (A) such other information will be added to such covered 
     records; and
       (B) the Secretary of Defense will notify the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs of such addition.
       (d) Sharing of Protected Health Information.--For purposes 
     of the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the 
     Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
     (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note), making medical records available to 
     the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection (a) shall 
     be treated as a permitted disclosure.
       (e) Currently Available Records.--The Secretary of Veterans 
     Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall 
     ensure that the covered records of members of the Armed 
     Forces that are available to the Secretary as of the date of 
     the enactment of this Act are made electronically accessible 
     and available in real-time to the Veterans Benefits 
     Administration.
       (f) Covered Records Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``covered records'' means, with respect to a member of the 
     Armed Forces--
       (1) service treatment records;
       (2) accompanying personal records;
       (3) relevant unit records; and
       (4) medical records created by reason of treatment or 
     services received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United 
     States Code.


           Amendment No. 74 Offered by Mr. Bishop of New York

       At the end of title V, add the following new section:

     SEC. 5__. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE RECOVERY OF THE 
                   REMAINS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 
                   KILLED IN THURSTON ISLAND, ANTARCTICA.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) Commencing August 26, 1946, though late February 1947 
     the United States Navy Antarctic Developments Program Task 
     Force 68, codenamed ``Operation Highjump'' initiated and 
     undertook the largest ever-to-this-date exploration of the 
     Antarctic continent.
       (2) The primary mission of the Task Force 68 organized by 
     Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. USN, (Ret) and led by Rear 
     Admiral Richard H. Cruzen, USN, was to do the following:
       (A) Establish the Antarctic research base Little America 
     IV.
       (B) In the defense of the United States of America from 
     possible hostile aggression from abroad - to train personnel 
     test equipment, develop techniques for establishing, 
     maintaining and utilizing air bases on ice, with 
     applicability comparable to interior Greenland, where 
     conditions are similar to those of the Antarctic.
       (C) Map and photograph a full two-thirds of the Antarctic 
     Continent during the classified, hazardous duty/volunteer-
     only operation involving 4700 sailors, 23 aircraft and 13 
     ships including the first submarine the U.S.S. Sennet, and 
     the aircraft carrier the U.S.S. Philippine Sea, brought to 
     the edge of the ice pack to launch (6) Navy ski-equipped, 
     rocket-assisted R4Ds.
       (D) Consolidate and extend United States sovereignty over 
     the largest practicable area of the Antarctic continent.
       (E) Determine the feasibility of establishing, maintaining 
     and utilizing bases in the Antarctic and investigating 
     possible base sites.
       (3) While on a hazardous duty/all volunteer mission vital 
     to the interests of National Security and while over the 
     eastern Antarctica coastline known as the Phantom Coast, the 
     PBM-5 Martin Mariner ``Flying Boat'' ``George 1'' entered a 
     whiteout over Thurston Island. As the pilot attempted to 
     climb, the aircraft grazed the glacier's ridgeline and 
     exploded within 5 seconds instantly killing Ensign Maxwell 
     Lopez, Navigator and Wendell ``Bud'' Hendersin, Aviation 
     Machinists Mate 1st Class while Frederick Williams, Aviation 
     Radioman 1st Class died several hours later. Six other 
     crewmen survived including the Captain of the ``George 1's'' 
     seaplane tender U.S.S. Pine Island.
       (4) The bodies of the dead were protected from the 
     desecration of Antarctic scavenging birds (Skuas) by the 
     surviving crew wrapping the bodies and temporarily burying 
     the men under the starboard wing engine nacelle.
       (5) Rescue requirements of the ``George-1'' survivors 
     forced the abandonment of their crewmates' bodies.
       (6) Conditions prior to the departure of Task Force 68 
     precluded a return to the area to the recover the bodies.
       (7) For nearly 60 years Navy promised the families that 
     they would recover the men: ``If the safety, logistical, and 
     operational prerequisites allow a mission in the future, 
     every effort will be made to bring our sailors home.''.
       (8) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command twice offered to 
     recover the bodies of this crew for Navy.
       (9) A 2004 NASA ground penetrating radar overflight 
     commissioned by Navy relocated the crash site three miles 
     from its crash position.
       (10) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command offered to 
     underwrite the cost of an aerial ground penetrating radar 
     (GPR) survey of the crash site area by NASA.
       (11) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command studied the 
     recovery with the recognized recovery authorities and 
     national scientists and determined that the recovery is only 
     ``medium risk''.
       (12) National Science Foundation and scientists from the 
     University of Texas, Austin, regularly visit the island.
       (13) The crash site is classified as a ``perishable site'', 
     meaning a glacier that will calve into the Bellingshausen 
     Sea.
       (14) The National Science Foundation maintains a presence 
     in area - of the Pine Island Glacier.
       (15) The National Science Foundation Director of Polar 
     Operations will assist and provide assets for the recovery 
     upon the request of Congress.
       (16) The United States Coast Guard is presently pursuing 
     the recovery of 3 WWII air crewmen from similar circumstances 
     in Greenland.
       (17) On Memorial Day, May 25, 2009, President Barak Obama 
     declared: ``. . .the support of our veterans is a sacred 
     trust. . .we need to serve them as they have served us. . 
     .that means bringing home all our POWs and MIAs. . .''.
       (18) The policies and laws of the United States of America 
     require that our armed service personnel be repatriated.
       (19) The fullest possible accounting of United States 
     fallen military personnel means repatriating living American 
     POWs and MIAs, accounting for, identifying, and recovering 
     the remains of military personnel who were killed in the line 
     of duty, or providing convincing evidence as to why such a 
     repatriation, accounting, identification, or recovery is not 
     possible.
       (20) It is the responsibility of the Federal Government to 
     return to the United States for proper burial and respect all 
     members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty who 
     lie in lost graves.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--In light of the findings under 
     subsection (a), Congress--
       (1) reaffirms its support for the recovery and return to 
     the United States, the remains and bodies of all members of 
     the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty, and for the 
     efforts by the Joint POW-MIA Accounting Command to recover 
     the remains of members of the Armed Forces from all wars, 
     conflicts and missions;

[[Page 9095]]

       (2) recognizes the courage and sacrifice of all members of 
     the Armed Forces who participated in Operation Highjump and 
     all missions vital to the national security of the United 
     States of America;
       (3) acknowledges the dedicated research and efforts by the 
     US Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, the 
     Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, the Fallen American 
     Veterans Foundation and all persons and organizations to 
     identify, locate, and advocate for, from their temporary 
     Antarctic grave, the recovery of the well-preserved frozen 
     bodies of Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Naval Aviator, Frederick 
     Williams, Aviation Machinist's Mate 1ST Class, Wendell 
     Hendersin, Aviation Radioman 1ST Class of the ``George 1'' 
     explosion and crash; and
       (4) encourages the Department of Defense to review the 
     facts, research and to pursue new efforts to undertake all 
     feasible efforts to recover, identify, and return the well-
     preserved frozen bodies of the ``George 1'' crew from 
     Antarctica's Thurston Island.


        Amendment No. 77 Offered by Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania

       Page 299, after the matter following line 23, insert the 
     following:

     SEC. 703. EXTENSION OF TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) Telemedicine.--In carrying out the Transitional 
     Assistance Management Program, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     extend the coverage of such program to individuals by an 
     additional 180 days for treatment provided through 
     telemedicine.
       (b) Mental Health Care and Behavioral Services.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall extend the coverage of 
     the Transitional Assistance Management Program for covered 
     treatment to covered individuals for a period determined 
     necessary by a health care professional treating the covered 
     individual.
       (2) Definitions.--In this subsection:
       (A) The term ``covered individual'' means an individual 
     who--
       (i) during the initial 180-day period of being enrolled in 
     the Transitional Assistance Management Program, received any 
     mental health care treatment or covered treatment; or
       (ii) during the one-year period preceding separation or 
     discharge from the Armed Forces, received any mental health 
     care treatment.
       (B) The term ``covered treatment'' means behavioral 
     services provided through telemedicine.
       (3) Sunset.--The authority of the Secretary to carry out 
     paragraph (1) shall terminate on December 31, 2018, if the 
     Secretary determines that by that date the suicide rates for 
     both members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and 
     for members of a reserve component are 50 percent less than 
     such rates as of December 31, 2012.
       (c) Telemedicine Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``telemedicine'' means the use by a health care provider of 
     telecommunications to assist in the diagnosis or treatment of 
     a patient's medical condition, including for behavioral 
     services.


          Amendment No. 78 Offered by Mr. Guthrie of Kentucky

       Page 299, after the matter following line 23, insert the 
     following:

     SEC. 703. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON IMPROVEMENTS TO CARE AND 
                   TRANSITION OF SERVICE MEMBERS WITH UROTRAUMA.

       (a) Comprehensive Policy Required.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than January 1, 2014, the 
     Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
     shall jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on 
     improvements to the care, management, and transition of 
     recovering service members with urotrauma.
       (2) Scope of policy.--The policy shall cover each of the 
     following:
       (A) The care and management of the specific needs of 
     service members who are urotrauma patients, including 
     eligibility for the Recovery Care Coordinator Program 
     pursuant to the Wounded Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
       (B) The return of service members who have recovered to 
     active duty when appropriate.
       (C) The transition of recovering service members from 
     receipt of care and services through the Department of 
     Defense to receipt of care and services through the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs.
       (3) Consultation.--The Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall develop the policy in 
     consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments 
     and agencies of the Federal Government, with representatives 
     of military service organizations representing the interests 
     of service members who are urotrauma patients and with 
     appropriate nongovernmental organizations having an expertise 
     in matters relating to the policy.
       (b) Report.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to Congress a report 
     that includes a review identifying and options for responding 
     to gaps in the care of service members who are urotrauma 
     patients.


            Amendment No. 79 Offered by Mr. Gallego of Texas

       Page 308, line 7, strike ``and'' after the semicolon.
       Page 308, line 11, strike the period and insert ``; and''.
       Page 308, after line 11, insert the following:
       (3) determine the effectiveness of the efforts of the 
     Department of Defense in reducing suicide rates of members of 
     the Armed Forces.


        Amendment No. 82 Offered by Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire

       At the end of subtitle C of title VII, insert the 
     following:

     SEC. 726. REPORT ON ROLE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS IN 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to 
     the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans' Affairs of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services 
     and Veterans' Affairs of the Senate a report on the centers 
     of excellence established under sections 1621, 1622, and 1623 
     of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
     2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). Such report 
     shall include each of the following:
       (1) The amount of resources that have been obligated by 
     Department of Veterans Affairs in support of each of the 
     centers since the dates on which they were established, 
     including the amount of personnel, time, money, and function 
     provided in support of the centers.
       (2) An estimate of the amount of resources the Secretary 
     expects the Department to dedicate to each of the centers 
     during each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018.
       (3) A description of the role of the Department within each 
     of the centers.


        Amendment No. 83 Offered by Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 726. PRELIMINARY MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS.

       Before any individual enlists in the Armed Forces or is 
     commissioned as an officer in the Armed Forces, the Secretary 
     of Defense shall provide the individual with a mental health 
     assessment. The Secretary shall use such results as a 
     baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations, 
     including such examinations provided under sections 1074f and 
     1074m of title 10, United States Code, and section 1074n of 
     such title, as added by section 702.


          Amendment No. 102 Offered by Mr. DeSantis of Florida

       At the end of subtitle D of title IX, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. __. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 
                   COLLABORATIVE CYBERSECURITY ACTIVITIES WITH 
                   CHINA.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     may be used for collaborative cybersecurity activities with 
     the People's Republic of China or any entity owned or 
     controlled by China, including cybersecurity war games, 
     cybersecurity working groups, the exchange of classified 
     cybersecurity technologies or methods, and the exchange of 
     procedures for investigating cyber intrusions.


           Amendment No. 107 Offered by Mr. Broun of Georgia

       At the end of subtitle H of title X, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 1080. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF 
                   THE PALOMARES NUCLEAR WEAPONS ACCIDENT REVISED 
                   DOSE EVALUATION REPORT.

        Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the 
     Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
     Representatives a report on the implementation of the 
     recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident 
     Revised Dose Evaluation Report released in April by the Air 
     Force in 2001.


           Amendment No. 126 Offered by Mr. Conaway of Texas

       At the end of subtitle D of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS AT 
                   TRAINING LOCATIONS IN SOUTHWEST ASIA.

       Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 
     U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence, by inserting after ``programs'' 
     the following: ``and integrated air and missile defense 
     programs''; and
       (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``post-
     undergraduate flying and tactical leadership'' and inserting 
     ``such''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Texas (Mr. Thornberry) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Larsen) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I urge the committee to adopt the 
amendments en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the 
majority and the minority.
  I reserve the balance of my time.

[[Page 9096]]


  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the en 
bloc amendment and encourage our colleagues to support it.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Posey).
  Mr. POSEY. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  I am pleased that my bipartisan bill, the Deployed Troops Support 
Act, is part of an en bloc amendment later this evening.
  My amendment simply allows the Department of Defense to transport, on 
a space-available basis, goods supplied by nonprofit organizations to 
members of the armed services who are deployed overseas.
  We ensure that the Secretary has the authority to determine that 
there is a legitimate need for the goods being shipped, and that the 
supplies are suitable for distribution, and that adequate arrangements 
have been made for the distribution when the shipment arrives.
  This legislative idea was brought to me by veterans in my 
congressional district, specifically, AVET Project. If enacted into 
law, it would give our troops the same consideration on a space 
available as currently granted to foreigners under the Denton Program.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentlewoman from Connecticut (Ms. Esty).
  Ms. ESTY. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of this en bloc amendment, 
which includes my amendment to add the Proper Replacement of Medals and 
Performance Tracking, the PROMPT Act, to the underlying legislation.
  I want to first thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for 
their leadership and cooperation. And I'd also like to thank my 
colleague, Dr. Joe Heck, for making the PROMPT Act a bipartisan effort 
aimed at improving our service to veterans, servicemembers, and their 
families.
  I drafted this legislation after working with several veterans in my 
district to replace medals and decorations that they've been waiting 
months, and sometimes years, to receive.
  One constituent, a Korean War veteran, has grandchildren that want to 
see his medals and document his service as part of the family history. 
He should not have to wait indefinitely for the medals he earned in 
service to this country.
  Nor should Paul Sypek, the Vietnam veteran in my district seeking to 
replace his Army Commendation Medal. He first had to correct a clerical 
error that omitted the decoration from his separation papers. More than 
2 years later, he's still waiting for the replacement medal he 
requested.
  The PROMPT Act creates performance standards to ensure that requests 
are fulfilled in a timely and organized fashion. We can and we must do 
better for those who served our country with distinction. Adding the 
PROMPT Act to H.R. 1960 ensures that we will. I urge support for the en 
bloc amendment.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
New York (Mr. Collins).
  Mr. COLLINS of New York. I rise tonight to speak on behalf of an 
amendment to be offered later. This amendment provides a sense of 
Congress to the Secretary of Defense and urges my colleagues to support 
this amendment, which will help maintain a strong National Guard and 
Reserve.
  We've seen, time and again, whether it's Superstorm Sandy or other 
national catastrophes, the National Guard and the Reserve that have 
come to the Nation and helped support us in a time of need. September 
11 it was the members of the Air National Guard that flew jets over New 
York City and this Nation's Capitol.
  Many members of both the Guard and Reserve have fought and died for 
this country in Iraq and Afghanistan. Time and again we have called on 
them to support us, and this proposed amendment just urges the 
Secretary of Defense to make sure that we send the message that he 
should make every effort to ensure our military Reserve and National 
Guard forces are fully manned and fully funded to help the United 
States fulfill its longstanding commitment to the unyielding defense of 
this country.
  Mr. Chairman, the brave men and women who fill the ranks of both the 
National Guard and Reserve deserve nothing else.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gallego).
  Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. Chairman, I too would like to thank the chairman and 
the ranking member as I rise today in support of the en bloc 
amendments. These amendments include two amendments which I have 
authored to support the men and women who serve in our armed services, 
and to support their families.
  The first amendment ensures that the Department of Defense can 
continue to fast-track and to expedite the hiring of critical health 
care workers who treat our wounded warriors and provide care to 
military families. Members of our armed services make incredible 
sacrifices, and taking care of them, and taking care of their loved 
ones, is one of the most sacred promises that our country can make.
  This amendment helps folks who receive medical attention at places 
like Brooke Army Medical Center and Fort Bliss William Beaumont Army 
Medical Center.
  The amendment would designate critical health care workers as part of 
a special ``shortage category'' and thus make them eligible for 
salaries that are competitive with the higher salaries that are offered 
by the VA for similar positions.
  We need to ensure the highest standard of treatment for the men and 
the women who have given so much to our country.
  There is no increase in costs associated. The Department of Defense 
has already budgeted for this proposal.
  The second amendment helps ensure that the Secretary of Defense can 
take measures, as he sees fit, to determine the effectiveness of our 
efforts to reduce suicide by members of our armed services.
  The military suicide rate hit a record high last year with 349 people 
who took their own lives across the four branches. That averages out to 
1 every 25 hours.

                              {time}  1940

  We must take any and all measures to help reduce the suicide rates 
among those who serve our country. As a member of the Armed Services 
Committee, again, I thank the chairman and the ranking member and all 
of the members of the committee for their hard work on a very vital 
piece of legislation, including these provisions to treat wounded 
warriors and to reduce suicide rates.
  Mr. Chairman, I encourage passage of the en bloc amendments.
  Mr. TURNER. We have no further speakers, and I yield back the balance 
of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of 
my time.
  Mrs. BUSTOS. Mr. Chair, I am here to ask that you support my 
amendment requesting the Secretary of the Army to review and provide a 
report on the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht 
of Moline, Illinois.
  Many, including the Vietnam Veterans of America, strongly believe 
that after reviewing all of the documentation that the Silver Star is 
not commensurate with Captain Albracht's actions during the five days 
of the siege of Firebase Kate in South Vietnam.
  It is the belief that the Army performed a cursory review of the 
nomination, given the length of time between Captain Albracht's heroic 
actions and his initial Medal of Honor nomination.
  Forty-three years ago, Captain Albracht, then a 21-year-old Green 
Beret, was in charge of a U.S. military evacuation at Firebase Kate.
  Captain Albracht's strong leadership, calm under extreme duress, and 
care for countless other soldiers was exemplary. He was responsible for 
saving 150 lives.
  Outnumbered 40-to-1 and vulnerable, conditions grew more dire. 
Albracht took shrapnel to the arm. The wound easily could have landed 
him aboard one of the last medevac helicopters that dared approach 
Firebase Kate.
  But he chose to stay.
  He led these 150 men off the base, despite being wounded, surrounded 
and constantly

[[Page 9097]]

targeted by the enemy. After long nights, Captain Albracht's escape 
plan worked.
  After arriving safely at a nearby outpost, word came that there would 
be a ceremony to honor their heroic actions. A helicopter was sent to 
pick up Captain Albracht, despite poor flying conditions that had 
grounded many other aircraft.
  Upon arrival of the helicopter, Captain Albracht noted that there 
were several wounded soldiers who could not be airlifted due to weather 
conditions. He told the aircrew of his helicopter to get the men to a 
hospital. Giving up his seat caused him to miss the ceremony. His 
actions went unrecognized for four decades.
   Others under Captain Albracht's command and guidance were awarded 
Silver Stars for their actions that day. However, Captain Albracht was 
not recognized for leading his soldiers to safety through the dense 
Vietnamese jungle while repeatedly facing extreme enemy fire.
   Many believe that every man at Firebase Kate would have died if not 
for Captain Albracht. There was no one else capable of calling in an 
airstrike and no one there capable of inspiring these men to follow him 
into that jungle.
   This is why I am requesting that the Army review and provide a 
report on why Captain Albracht's heroic actions and Medal of Honor 
nomination was downgraded two levels.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Thornberry).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.


          Amendment No. 33 Offered by Mr. Larsen of Washington

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 33 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I rise to offer amendment 33 
as the designee of Mr. Cooper.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 425, after line 23, insert the following:

     SEC. 1060. NEW START TREATY FUNDING.

       (a) Reduction.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in 
     the funding tables in division D--
       (1) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 
     201, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4201, for research, development, test, and 
     evaluation, defense-wide, Space Programs and Technology, is 
     decreased by $50,000,000; and
       (2) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 
     301, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4301, for operation and maintenance, defense-wide, 
     Office of the Secretary of Defense is decreased by 
     $20,491,000.
       (b) Increases.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in 
     the funding tables in division D:
       (1) The amount authorized to be appropriated in section 
     101, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4101, for procurement is increased as follows:
       (A) Weapons Procurement, Navy, Trident II Modifications by 
     $14,100,000.
       (B) Other Procurement, Navy, Strategic Missiles System 
     Equipment by $25,919,000.
       (C) Other Procurement, Navy, Spares and repair Parts by 
     $275,000.
       (D) Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, B52 by $500,000.
       (2) The amount authorized to be appropriated in section 
     201, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4201, for Missile Procurement, Air Force, Initial 
     Spares/Repair Parts is increased by $703,000.
       (3) The amount authorized to be appropriated in section 
     301, as specified in the corresponding funding table in 
     section 4301, for operation and maintenance is increased as 
     follows:
       (A) Combat Communications by $9,594,000.
       (B) Depot Maintenance by $4,000,000.
       (C) Other Service-wide Activities by $15,400,000.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Washington (Mr. Larsen) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Washington.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, this amendment would restore 
funding for commonsense nuclear weapons reductions that have already 
been approved with the advice and consent of the Senate and that the 
Navy and the Air Force have planned for fiscal year 2014.
  The $70 million cut in the bill keeps nuclear weapons at Cold War 
levels, and denying fiscal year '14 funding risks the United States 
missing the deadline for treaty compliance as there will be 
insufficient lead time for procurement and installation to support 
conversion efforts to implement the reductions required by 2018, the 
date of entry into force.
  This amendment is funded by an offset of $50 million from DARPA's 
space technology program due to the recently terminated System F6, 
which was aimed to distribute functions of big satellites into several 
small ones orbiting in tight formation--so this funding is available--
and $20 million from the $2.1 billion in the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense O&M funds which pays OSD staff. This is a 1 percent cut with 
minimal impact, as the Secretary of Defense has indicated that he 
intends to make cuts to overhead.
  So I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
  With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I claim time in opposition.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished 
gentleman from Alabama, the chairman of the Strategic Forces 
Subcommittee.
  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I thank the chairman.
  Today I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by my good friend 
and colleague from Tennessee (Mr. Cooper) as well as my good friend 
from Washington State.
  The committee zeroed out these funds because the administration 
appears to be expecting a blank check from the Congress to implement 
this treaty. The House, through the appropriation power, must have a 
chance to evaluate whether the implementation of a treaty and the 
manner in which an administration intends to implement a treaty is in 
the U.S. national security interest. That's the reason the 1042 report 
was required in the FY12 NDAA in the first place.
  I remind the House, this report is mandated by law. Are we really 
comfortable in this House with letting the President ignore the law of 
the land as he sees fit?
  Additionally, while the gentleman from Tennessee withdrew the 
amendment at the full committee level because the offset he selected 
was of concern, the offset he has now is also a problem. It takes a 
program in DARPA that has been eliminated recently, and the funds for 
that program are planned to support transition activities to two other 
DARPA programs. Diverting $50 million from this effort now would 
significantly slow down the schedule for these two programs.
  Additionally, we expect President Obama to announce, likely next week 
in Berlin, that he will seek to reduce our deployed nuclear forces by 
one-third--beyond the New START treaty reductions we have yet to put in 
place. We need to put the brakes on this rush to zero. This President 
is proposing dangerous and irreversible changes to our nuclear forces.
  I urge my colleagues to reject the amendment.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, how much time remains?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington has 3\3/4\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to 
yield the balance of the time to the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. 
Cooper).
  The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from Tennessee 
will control the remainder of the time.
  There was no objection.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, it's a shame that President Ronald Reagan 
would have a hard time getting nominated in today's Republican Party. 
If you look back at what President Reagan said, he called for the 
abolition of ``all nuclear weapons.'' Furthermore, he went on to say 
that these weapons are ``totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for 
nothing but killing, possibly destructive of life on Earth and 
civilization.''
  Now, no one on this side of the aisle is calling for abolition, but 
we are calling for the United States of America to live up to its 
legitimate treaty commitments as passed by an overwhelming majority of 
the United

[[Page 9098]]

States Senate. Now, I know there is very little love lost for the other 
body, but it was an overwhelming vote, and it was just 2 or 3 years 
ago.
  The treaty is supposed to be implemented in 2018. Why the other side 
of the aisle is not more interested in reducing Russian nuclear 
weapons, I do not know, but this just simply allows us to live up to 
our legitimate and legal treaty commitments.
  The other side is welcome to have suspicions of all sorts of things, 
but we should obey the treaties that we have ratified. So this calls 
for $70 million to do that.
  We can always question offsets. I've worked very hard with the other 
side to try to find appropriate offsets. But the key is let's restore 
the $70 million that our own military wants so that we can implement 
this treaty which could reduce nuclear risk in this world as President 
Reagan called for.
  This is an opportunity. This is a necessity if we're going to live up 
to our legal obligations. I have the utmost respect for my friend from 
Alabama, the chairman of the subcommittee. This is a fixable problem. 
This is a needless political fight. In the full committee, as the 
gentleman knows, we try to work very closely with folks on the other 
side of the aisle. This is just $70 million to live up to our existing 
treaty commitments.
  I would urge my colleagues of good faith on both sides of the aisle, 
we can do this. We must do this. Let's follow what President Reagan 
would have wanted and let's support this treaty commitment.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished 
chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee, the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner).
  Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, let's be clear. It has been misstated that 
if this amendment doesn't pass that we would leave nuclear weapons at 
the Cold War level. Our nuclear weapons have already been reduced by 90 
percent since the peak of the Cold War and 75 percent since the end of 
the Cold War.
  Ronald Reagan never said that the United States should disarm itself 
at its disadvantage. He saw a world where no one would have nuclear 
weapons, not that we would place ourselves at a disadvantage. I 
certainly believe that, as Ronald Reagan would look around the world 
today, he would have never foreseen a nuclear-capable North Korea, and 
he certainly wouldn't have seen the world watch as Iran marches to 
become a nuclear state.
  This amendment actually would take money from programs that are 
important, but it would put money toward something that is just not 
ready. We know we're not ready for New START treaty implementation, and 
we also know that we are certainly not going to be in breach.
  This is not an issue of our walking away from a treaty obligation. 
This is not at all an issue of saying that Russia should not reduce 
their nuclear weapons. In fact, we believe that Russia ought to further 
reduce especially their tactical nuclear weapons, the overwhelming 
thousands that they have pointed at Europe that are in greater numbers 
than Europe or the United States would ever imagine.
  We believe that we should stand up to the treaty obligations. But to 
fulfill those, we have to look to what the President promised, which, 
as the President said, in order for us to go to the New START treaty 
levels, that America has work to do. That work needs to be done.
  While the President walks away from his commitments to nuclear 
modernization of our infrastructure and our weapons and fails to turn 
in the 1042 report that would give us the understanding of what our 
overall strategy is, the President wants to continue down this path of 
dismantling nuclear weapons when we're just not ready. New START can 
wait until we satisfy the convictions that even the President had put 
forward.

                              {time}  1950

  But even further, we have to look at what the President currently is 
doing. The President has signaled that he wants to reduce nuclear 
weapons further even before we've gone to New START. The problem is 
that obviously North Korea has just recently marched a weapon to the 
launch pad that could threaten the United States. This is not the time 
to do this.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire as to how much time I have 
remaining.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee has 1\3/4\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, let me speak very briefly, and then I will 
yield the balance of my time to my friend from California.
  My colleagues on the other side of the aisle, no one can know for 
sure what President Reagan would have done today. But read what Henry 
Kissinger is writing today, George Shultz--keepers, I think, of the 
Reagan legacy. They are working with Sam Nunn and others to do what we 
can to have enforceable, reliable treaties with the former Soviet 
Union, with Russia. And I would urge my colleagues to do what our own 
military is requesting, to give them the means to implement this 
treaty.
  I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Garamendi).
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Trust and verify. Wow. In the New START treaty, it's 
trust and verify. But to get to the trust and verify, we're going to 
have to begin the process--$70 million requested by the military to 
begin the process.
  I know the gentleman on the other side of this question has spent 
days and days working through this budget. The military plans years 
ahead; And in order to carry out the New START treaty and see the 
reductions that we need to make on our side, as obligated by that 
treaty, we need to begin that planning process now.
  It's not a matter of throwing the weapons out or disposing of these 
weapons today. It's how we go about getting to that point, and the $70 
million is essential for that.
  We'll delay by one whole year the process of carrying out our treaty 
obligations. Russia is in the process of carrying out their treaty 
obligations, and we should too.
  It's very simple, guys. It's about carrying out an obligation that we 
have. It's about giving the military the money that they need today to 
begin the planning, to do the early parts of that process.
  Trust and verify. The Russians want us--they trust us, maybe, but 
they want verification. We want verification from them also. This is 
all about carrying out a treaty obligation, getting it going.
  Mr. COOPER. I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. FORTENBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Chairman, none of us of course could know what President Reagan 
would have done. I would suggest, however, that if we had a Reagan 
approach to defense, we would not still be arguing about missile 
defense, and we certainly wouldn't be debating $60 billion cuts to 
defense.
  The other point I would make is ratification of the New START treaty 
was conditioned in the Senate upon certain investments to our nuclear 
deterrent infrastructure. Unfortunately, those investments have not 
been forthcoming.
  Let me talk about the offset for just a second. The most cutting-edge 
done for our military is done at DARPA. DARPA funding is flat, and 
there are a number of us who are concerned about that. But what they do 
at DARPA is they evaluate the projects they have; and if one seems less 
promising than others, they move that money around. So what this 
amendment does is punish them for doing that, because as they are 
moving money from one project to another that seems more promising, it 
takes that money away. When you're looking at funding research, it 
seems to me we want to encourage that sort of flexibility towards the 
most promising avenues of the research, and yet this amendment takes 
exactly the opposite approach.
  For a variety of reasons, Mr. Chairman, I think this amendment is not 
a good idea, and I would recommend Members vote against it.
  I yield back the balance of my time.

[[Page 9099]]

  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Larsen).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Washington 
will be postponed.


                 Amendment No. 36 Offered by Mr. Gibson

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 36 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. GIBSON. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Strike section 1251.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from New York (Mr. Gibson) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New York.
  Mr. GIBSON. Mr. Chairman, this amendment is very simple. It strikes 
the language in section 1251, which pertains to Syria--a very serious 
subject that's been talked about here this evening. In my view, we 
should be debating this in regular order, and there should be a stand-
alone resolution that deals with Syria.
  You know, this language that we have in the underlying bill, the 
intent of it I understand, it was supposed to deal with the weapons of 
mass destruction in Syria, the control of them. That would be one 
thing. But I just want every Member to understand what's in the 
underlying language.
  Subsection b, subsection 1:

       President Obama should fully consider all courses of action 
     to remove President Assad from power.

  That sounds a lot like unilateral action for regime change to me.
  Subsection 5:

       The United States should continue to support Syrian 
     opposition forces with nonlethal aid.

  I don't remember authorizing any aid to begin with, much less 
continuing.
  Subsection 8:

       Should the President decide to employ any military assets 
     in Syria, the President should provide a supplemental budget 
     request to Congress.

  Well, yes on the supplemental budget request if it ever comes to it. 
But should the President decide to employ any military assets, that's 
for us to decide, not for the President.
  So, Mr. Chairman, I have concerns. I certainly understand the initial 
intent. It is my strongest recommendation that we strike this language, 
that we work together on language that is more suitable for an NDAA, 
and then, if desired, to have broader discussion with a separate 
resolution if somebody wants to move forward with regard to action in 
Syria.
  I would say that I oppose military action in Syria, but I certainly 
think there should be voices. We should have Representatives speaking 
for their people.
  And I hope that we learn. You know, in 2011, I came here very 
concerned about Libya. I spoke out against military action. We ended up 
taking military action. I was concerned that we would empower forces 
hostile to us. And I regret to say on September 11 of last year, we 
ended up with a situation in Benghazi that we all are very saddened by. 
I want to see us learn from this, and I certainly want to see us strike 
this language.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. I rise to claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, at this time I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to my 
friend and colleague, the gentlelady from Indiana (Mrs. Walorski).
  Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, while I greatly respect the author of 
this amendment, I must rise in opposition.
  This amendment does, in fact, strike section 1251 of the underlying 
bill that expresses a sense of Congress in regard to Syria. Section 
1251 says the President should have a plan in place to secure U.S. 
interests in Syria; that the U.S. should support the stability of our 
allies like Israel--our strongest ally in the region; and that the U.S. 
should continue to conduct rigorous planning to secure any chemical and 
biological stockpiles. It does not say that the U.S. should intervene 
in Syria. And it requires the President to provide a supplemental 
budget should military action be necessary.
  Although much delayed, the confirmation from the Obama administration 
just a few hours ago that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons 
against rebel forces demonstrates why section 1251 is needed. It's time 
to get serious about addressing Syria and develop a plan to protect 
American interests in the region.
  According to the President, Assad has crossed a red line. By turning 
a blind eye to this civil war that has already claimed more than 90,000 
lives, we lose credibility within the region and embolden bad actors 
like Iran and Hezbollah.
  I would ask my colleagues to vote against this amendment.
  Mr. GIBSON. Mr. Chairman, I'll yield myself about 20 seconds, and 
then I'm going to yield to my good friend from California.
  I just want to say in response that, with regard to planning, 
absolutely. I know our military forces are always in the process of 
planning.
  Standing with Israel, absolutely. But I just would remind my 
colleagues to read the language in here. This is inappropriate for an 
NDAA. It is not in our interest to be affirming this language.
  At this point, I'd like to yield to my good friend from California 
(Mr. Garamendi).

                              {time}  2000

  Mr. GARAMENDI. May I inquire as to the time available?
  The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman has 2\1/4\ minutes remaining.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
  A lot of analogies come to mind: slippery slopes, camel's nose under 
the tent.
  Syria is an extremely serious matter, and the role of the United 
States in the serious issue of Syria needs to be fully vetted by the 
Congress and the Senate. We are debating; 435 of us are given 10 
minutes, 10 minutes of time to this issue, plus perhaps another 5 
minutes in the committee hearing, to this matter of what is the role of 
the United States in the serious Syrian issue.
  Slippery slope, red lines, military aid, nonlethal aid. What does it 
all mean? Where is the House Foreign Affairs Committee on this matter? 
And by the way, how did this slip by the requirement of dual 
referencing? It did. We're here.
  Ten minutes, 10 minutes on a matter that could very easily suck the 
United States into another war in the Middle East. We need time. We 
need to debate this. We need to understand all the ramifications of 
this. The language in this particular section is really serious 
language. It's far more than has been stated on the floor. Put it 
aside, step back, take our time, understand what all the ramifications 
are.
  Mr. GIBSON. I would like to yield my remaining time to my colleague 
from Minnesota.
  Mr. NOLAN. Madam Chairman, I rise in support of the Gibson-Garamendi 
amendment. I'm using this time to express my regret that a resolution 
that I presented to the Rules Committee requiring the Congress to 
decide on whether or not we should send arms and troops to the rebels 
was denied an opportunity to be heard today.
  The fact is, this is a centuries old conflict between the Sunnis and 
the Shiites. We have no friends in this fight. Believe me, I've lived 
in the Middle East, I've done business in the Middle East, I've studied 
the language, I've studied the culture. We have no friends in this 
conflict. The rebels--make no mistake about it--are the al Mazraa 
affiliated with al Qaeda.
  The Acting CHAIR (Ms. Ros-Lehtinen). The time of the gentleman has 
expired.

[[Page 9100]]


  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, at this time, I yield the balance of my time 
to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
  Mr. LAMBORN. Madam Chairman, I thank the chairman of the full 
committee for yielding me time.
  I have total respect for my colleague and friend from New York who 
authored this amendment, but I believe on this one this amendment is 
misguided and we should defeat it. This does not call for a declaration 
of war or any kinds of the, I think exaggerated responses I've heard in 
favor of this amendment. This says that the President should have a 
course of action.
  The President earlier stated that there are red lines concerning 
weapons of mass destruction. I believe, if the news today is correct, 
then belatedly maybe there is a step toward recognizing that and taking 
some action for red lines just in the last few hours.
  But we've been working on this amendment, we debated it in committee, 
because up until now, and even going forward--I'm not sure how much--
there hasn't been very much planning. There hasn't been a stated plan 
or a course of action by the administration. We need to have that in 
place.
  We can and should and will debate this further. But the 
administration, I believe, has been lacking in leadership--too much 
leading from behind, as we've seen in other places. There needs to be 
leadership.
  This is a volatile area of the world--there's no question about that. 
That doesn't mean, though, that we can be disengaged. We can't just 
throw our hands up and withdraw and put our heads in the sand.
  We have allies in the region, especially Israel. Israel needs to be 
supported and defended. We are the most powerful country in the world. 
We need to take a role of at least planning for what's happening.
  That's what this sense of Congress language does. Section 1251, the 
amendment offered by my friend and colleague from New York, would 
strike the language.
  I would urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment. Let's have some 
planning for once by this administration on this important issue.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Gibson).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. GIBSON. Madam Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York 
will be postponed.


                Amendment No. 37 Offered by Mr. Coffman

  The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 37 
printed in part B of House Report 113-108.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Madam Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       After section 1256, insert the following new section (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections accordingly):

     SEC. 1257. REMOVAL OF BRIGADE COMBAT TEAMS FROM EUROPE.

       (a) Finding.--Congress finds that, because defense spending 
     among European NATO countries fell 12% since 2008, from $314 
     billion to $275 billion, so that currently only 4 out of the 
     28 NATO allies of the United States are spending the widely 
     agreed-to standard of 2% of their GDP on defense, the United 
     States must look to more wisely allocate scarce resources to 
     provide for the national defense.
       (b) Removal Required.--The President shall end the 
     permanent basing of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (2CR) in 
     Vilseck, Germany and return that Brigade Combat Team 
     currently stationed in Europe to the United States, without 
     permanent replacement, leaving one Brigade Combat Team and 
     one Combat Aviation Brigade.
       (c) Use of Rotational Forces to Satisfy Security Needs.--It 
     is the policy of the United States that the deployment of 
     units of the United States Armed Forces on a rotational basis 
     at military installations in European member nations of the 
     North Atlantic Treaty Organization pursuant to the Army Force 
     Generation (ARFORGEN) process is a force-structure 
     arrangement sufficient to permit the United States--
       (1) to satisfy the commitments undertaken by United States 
     pursuant to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at 
     Washington, District of Columbia, on April 4, 1949, and 
     entered into force on August 24, 1949 (63 Stat. 2241; TIAS 
     1964);
       (2) to address the current security environment in Europe; 
     and
       (3) to contribute to peace and stability in Europe.
       (d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed so as to require the removal of Landstuhl Regional 
     Medical Center or to prohibit the utilization of the 82nd 
     Airborne's Division Readiness Brigade, Marine Corps Fleet 
     Anti-Terrorism Security Teams, Marine Corps Special-Purpose 
     Marine Air-Ground Task Forces, Marine Corps expeditionary 
     units, Special Operations Command forces, or other quick-
     response forces to respond to threats in Europe and in the 
     vicinity of the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) area.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from Colorado (Mr. Coffman) and a Member opposed each will control 5 
minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Madam Chairman, I am proud to be joined by 
Representatives Polis, Griffith, and Blumenauer in offering an 
amendment to move away from our Cold War posture to meet the challenges 
of the future. This bipartisan amendment will end the permanent basing 
of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Germany and return that brigade combat 
team to the United States, without permanent replacement. There is no 
longer a strategic reason to maintain our current troop numbers in 
Europe.
  This action will still leave one brigade combat team and one combat 
aviation brigade in Europe. Nothing in this amendment demands the 
removal of our European medical facilities or rapid response forces.
  Should a crisis occur, it is not the BCTs that will be called to 
respond. In fact, just last month, the U.S. moved marines from a 
crisis-response force to Italy in anticipation that it could be needed 
to respond to growing unrest in Libya. In an emergency, expeditionary 
forces, such as the Marine Corp Special MAG Task Force and FAST teams, 
or even the Army's 82nd Airborne, would be called to action, not the 
BCTs in Germany.
  Only 4 out of 28 NATO allies spend even the required 2 percent of 
their GDP on defense. The U.S. spends 4.7 percent. Our allies keep 
defense spending low because they take for granted that we will 
guarantee their security. This is an unfair burden to U.S. taxpayers. 
We should reprioritize our commitments while meeting our security 
obligations to our NATO allies by utilizing rotational forces.
  I ask my colleagues to join in supporting this amendment to better 
deal with the strategic challenges of the future.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Chairman, I rise to claim time in 
opposition.
  The ACTING CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
  First of all, this is, a very dangerous, dangerous amendment. I am a 
member of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. I am also the vice chairman 
of the Science and Technology Committee of NATO. I have been a member 
of NATO for 11 years. That means I get to travel across the world two 
or three times each year into this region. I can tell you firsthand 
that this is a dangerous amendment, it is very dangerous at this time.
  Now, you have mentioned about some of our NATO colleagues. And yes, 
we are having a challenge. Each nation is going through economic 
challenges. But let me tell you, they are increasing their input and 
their financial resources each year.

                              {time}  2010

  One thing is for certain: the wrong message that we should send to 
them now and to encourage them to contribute more is for us to cut and 
run and contribute less, and that's exactly what this amendment that 
you are offering will do.

[[Page 9101]]

  The other point as to why it is dangerous is that we would sit here 
in Congress and force the hand of President Obama--or, for that matter, 
of any President or future President--to publicly state that he is 
going to remove a contingent of a brigade like the 2nd Cavalry Regiment 
in Vilseck, Germany, and then return that brigade to the United States 
and not put anything in its place. Europe and the Mediterranean and the 
Middle East--there is no more volatile, unpredictable place on this 
planet. At the same time, there is no place on this planet that we have 
the strength of alliances as we have here.
  With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. COFFMAN. I think we both have experience in NATO. You serve on 
this parliamentary committee, and I served in the United States Army in 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in the very type of unit that 
we are talking about today.
  That unit was designed to defend the border between what was West 
Germany and Czechoslovakia against Warsaw Pact forces that were on the 
other side. That border no longer exists. The Warsaw Pact no longer 
exists. Yet we still maintain a regiment there, which is not an 
expeditionary unit, to do the very things that you're talking about. We 
also have the capability to move our forces when needed over there.
  When I was in Europe during the height of the Cold War, protecting 
the very border in the same units that we are talking about today, we 
did the Reforger exercise on an annual basis in which U.S. forces would 
come over to Europe, in about the middle of western Germany, to 
reinforce our positions and to push those Warsaw Pact forces back.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Will the gentleman yield 10 seconds?
  Mr. COFFMAN. I yield to the gentleman.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Even today, yes, you are absolutely 
right; but what did they do in Europe when we asked them to stand with 
us in Afghanistan? They stood with us. What did they do when we asked 
in Iraq? All I am simply saying is that we have an obligation today and 
in the future.
  Mr. COFFMAN. I reclaim my time.
  There is nothing in the NATO charter that says we have to maintain 
permanent bases in Europe. I certainly support rotational forces. I 
support our involvement and our obligations to the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization, but it doesn't say we need to have a unit that is 
not an expeditionary force in the middle of Europe protecting a border 
that no longer exists.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. I yield 2 minutes to my dear friend, the 
gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Mike Turner.
  Mr. TURNER. This amendment is unlike anything that you're going to 
see in the National Defense Authorization Act. That's because this is 
not a function of Congress.
  This amendment says the President shall end the permanent basing of 
the 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Germany and return them to the United 
States.
  We don't move troops. There is a reason we don't move troops. There 
is nowhere in this bill you're going to find any provision that we move 
troops. That's because, in 10 minutes, we shouldn't have a debate about 
where troops would be.
  The gentleman is absolutely, dangerously incorrect. These troops are 
not like the troops with whom he served in the early seventies. These 
troops are active in defending the United States and our allies. They 
are absolutely necessary for forward deployment. We need the 3 to 5 
days it would take for these troops to make it to the important areas 
of Afghanistan, Israel, the Middle East, and it would take 20 days from 
the United States.
  Mr. COFFMAN. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. TURNER. No, I will not yield to the gentleman.
  Here is the most important thing:
  The gentleman says that these troops need to be reduced. We've 
reduced troops. Mind you, the gentleman served in the early seventies. 
Here is 1989. We had 213,000 troops. We've already drastically reduced 
them. They're already down to one-sixth of what they were. We are 
headed towards 30,000 troops in 2013.
  You have to think about what it is that these troops do--they do 
regional security; they do international cooperation; they do partner 
nation training; they're part of our ISAF support in Afghanistan; 
they're part of NATO cooperation. These troops are active. If you go 
and meet with any of our troops who are currently in Europe, they are 
actively working--our men and women in uniform--on our operations now.
  No one since the seventies has been staring down the bad Soviet 
Union. They are there protecting the United States and the United 
States' interests. They are our active men and women in uniform, and we 
have them forward-based because they help the United States in its 
functions of being able to deliver forces and our men and women to the 
important areas of where there are conflicts.
  General Breedlove of the European Command says that this is as far as 
we can go. He vehemently opposes this. Even those people who might be 
for reducing troops should not be for this. Congress should not be 
specifically telling the Commander in Chief where troops should be and 
how to move them. This is dangerously wrong. If the gentleman wants to 
move troops, he should apply for a job at the DOD if he is qualified.
  The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  The gentleman from Colorado has 1 minute remaining.
  Mr. COFFMAN. In closing, I did apply and work for the DOD. In fact, I 
served in both the Army and the Marine Corps, and in the 1980s, I 
served in NATO as well as in the 1970s.
  The mission has changed. Times have changed. We need to change. In 
doing so, we've got a unit there that really has no tactical purpose at 
this time. It is not an expeditionary force that can be readily moved. 
It would have to be moved to a railhead and then to a port facility and 
then be brought by ship in the most cost-effective manner.
  We are at a time when we have excess capacity in the United States in 
terms of the United States Army. The last report was in 2004 of 20 
percent excess capacity for the United States, and the administration 
wants to do another Base Realignment and Closure Commission. We ought 
to bring that unit home to the United States. It can deploy as needed, 
where needed, and not be in a country that's spending less than 2 
percent of its GDP on defense when we're at 4.7 percent.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Chair, how much time do I have 
remaining?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Georgia has 1 minute remaining.
  Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia. I would like to say this very quickly.
  How things have changed. Messages that go out from this floor go out 
around the world. As we speak, just at our most recent NATO meeting, we 
were able to get 27 nations out of the 28 nations of NATO to pass a 
resolution supporting the United States' and Israel's position against 
Iran's acquiring a nuclear bomb. That's how relevant we are today.
  With that, Madam Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to the 
gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Bridenstine).
  Mr. BRIDENSTINE. I would just like to make a couple of points.
  Number one, these troops are not for NATO. These troops are for the 
European Command. These troops are for the United States of America. 
I'm a Navy pilot myself. I've been a part of units that deploy, that 
rotate. What I can say is that, when units rotate, the training that we 
get with our allies is less robust and is just not as good as if you 
have a permanent presence where you can integrate with our NATO allies. 
It's true that we are integrated with our NATO allies, but it is also 
true that these troops are for European Command.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Coffman).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.

[[Page 9102]]


  Mr. COFFMAN. Madam Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado 
will be postponed.

                              {time}  2020


             Amendments En Bloc No. 5 Offered by Mr. McKeon

  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer 
amendments en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 5 consisting of amendment Nos. 86, 87, 88, 89, 
90, 91, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 104, 105, 109, 112, 115, 119, 121, and 
142, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of 
California:


         AMENDMENT NO. 86 OFFERED BY MR. PASCRELL OF NEW JERSEY

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 726. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY 
                   PLAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) section 739(b) of the National Defense Authorization 
     Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1822) 
     requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan to 
     Congress to improve the coordination and integration of the 
     programs of the Department of Defense that address traumatic 
     brain injury and the psychological health of members of the 
     Armed Forces not later than 180 days after the date of the 
     enactment of such Act;
       (2) the requirement to submit the plan is still in effect 
     and the contents of the plan are still important; and
       (3) the Secretary of Defense should deliver the report 
     within the required time frame.


         AMENDMENT NO. 87 OFFERED BY MR. PASCRELL OF NEW JERSEY

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 726. REPORT ON MEMORANDUM REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN 
                   INJURIES.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     congressional defense committees a report on how the 
     Secretary will identify, refer, and treat traumatic brain 
     injuries with respect to members of the Armed Forces who 
     served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi 
     Freedom before the date in June 2010 on which the memorandum 
     regarding using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as a 
     criterion to properly identify, refer, and treat members for 
     potential traumatic brain injury took effect.


            AMENDMENT NO. 88 OFFERED BY MR. SESSION OF TEXAS

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 726. PILOT PROGRAM FOR INVESTIGATIONAL TREATMENT OF 
                   MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN 
                   INJURY AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.

       (a) Process.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a 
     five-year pilot program under which the Secretary shall 
     establish a process through which the Secretary shall provide 
     payment for investigational treatments (including diagnostic 
     testing) of traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress 
     disorder received by members of the Armed Forces in health 
     care facilities other than military treatment facilities. 
     Such process shall provide that payment be made directly to 
     the health care facility furnishing the treatment.
       (b) Conditions for Approval.--The approval by the Secretary 
     for payment for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall 
     be subject to the following conditions:
       (1) Any drug or device used in the treatment must be 
     approved or cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for 
     any purpose and its use must comply with rules of the Food 
     and Drug Administration applicable to investigational new 
     drugs or investigational devices.
       (2) The treatment must be approved by the Secretary 
     following approval by an institutional review board operating 
     in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of 
     Health and Human Services.
       (3) The patient receiving the treatment must demonstrate an 
     improvement under criteria approved by the Secretary, as a 
     result of the treatment on one or more of the following:
       (A) Standardized independent pre-treatment and post-
     treatment neuropsychological testing.
       (B) Accepted survey instruments including, such instruments 
     that look at quality of life.
       (C) Neurological imaging.
       (D) Clinical examination.
       (4) The patient receiving the treatment must be receiving 
     the treatment voluntarily and based on informed consent.
       (5) The patient receiving the treatment may not be a 
     retired member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to 
     benefits under part A, or eligible to enroll under part B, of 
     title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
       (c) Additional Restrictions Authorized.--The Secretary may 
     establish additional restrictions or conditions for 
     reimbursement as the Secretary determines appropriate to 
     ensure the protection of human research subjects, appropriate 
     fiscal management, and the validity of the research results.
       (d) Authority.--The Secretary shall make payments under 
     this section for treatments received by members of the Armed 
     Forces using the authority in subsection (c)(1) of section 
     1074 of title 10, United States Code.
       (e) Amount.--A payment under this section shall be made at 
     the equivalent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 
     reimbursement rate in effect for appropriate treatment codes 
     for the State or territory in which the treatment is 
     received. If no such rate is in effect, payment shall be made 
     on a cost-reimbursement basis, as determined by the 
     Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and 
     Human Services.
       (f) Data Collection and Availability.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop and maintain a 
     database containing data from each patient case involving the 
     use of a treatment under this section. The Secretary shall 
     ensure that the database preserves confidentiality and that 
     any use of the database or disclosures of such data are 
     limited to such use and disclosures permitted by law and 
     applicable regulations.
       (2) Publication of qualified institutional review board 
     studies.--The Secretary shall ensure that an Internet website 
     of the Department of Defense includes a list of all civilian 
     institutional review board studies that have received a 
     payment under this section.
       (g) Assistance for Members to Obtain Treatment.--
       (1) Assignment to temporary duty.--The Secretary of a 
     military department may assign a member of the Armed Forces 
     under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to temporary duty or 
     allow the member a permissive temporary duty in order to 
     permit the member to receive treatment for traumatic brain 
     injury or post-traumatic stress disorder, for which payments 
     shall be made under subsection (a), at a location beyond 
     reasonable commuting distance of the permanent duty station 
     of the member.
       (2) Per diem.--A member who is away from the permanent 
     station of the member may be paid a per diem in lieu of 
     subsistence in an amount not more than the amount to which 
     the member would be entitled if the member were performing 
     travel in connection with a temporary duty assignment.
       (3) Gift rule waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive 
     any rule of the Department of Defense regarding ethics or the 
     receipt of gifts with respect to any assistance provided to a 
     member of the Armed Forces for travel or per diem expenses 
     incidental to receiving treatment under this section.
       (h) Memoranda of Understanding.--The Secretary shall enter 
     into memoranda of understandings with civilian institutions 
     for the purpose of providing members of the Armed Forces with 
     treatment carried out by civilian health care practitioners 
     under treatment--
       (1) approved by and under the oversight of civilian 
     institutional review boards; and
       (2) that would qualify for payment under this section.
       (i) Outreach.--The Secretary of Defense shall establish a 
     process to notify members of the Armed Forces of the 
     opportunity to receive treatment pursuant to this section.
       (j) Report to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after the 
     last day of each fiscal year during which the Secretary is 
     authorized to make payments under this section, the Secretary 
     shall submit to Congress an annual report on the 
     implementation of this section and any available results on 
     investigational treatment studies authorized under this 
     section.
       (k) Termination.--The authority to make a payment under 
     this section shall terminate on the date that is five years 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act.
       (l) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for 
     each fiscal year during which the Secretary is authorized to 
     make payments under this section.
       (m) Funding Increase and Offsetting Reduction.--
       (1) In general.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in 
     the funding tables in division D, to carry out this section 
     during fiscal year 2014--
       (A) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 
     1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the 
     corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby 
     increased by $10,000,000, with the amount of the increase 
     allocated to the Defense Health Program, as set forth in the 
     table under section 4501, to carry out this section; and
       (B) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 
     for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in 
     the corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby 
     reduced by $10,000,000, with the amount of the reduction to 
     be derived from Line 280, Office of the Secretary of Defense 
     as set forth in the table under section 4301.
       (2) Merit-based or competitive decisions.--A decision to 
     commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to in paragraph 
     (1)(A) with or to a specific entity shall--

[[Page 9103]]

       (A) be based on merit-based selection procedures in 
     accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k), 2361, 
     and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive 
     procedures; and
       (B) comply with other applicable provisions of law.


          AMENDMENT NO. 89 OFFERED BY MR. McKEON OF CALIFORNIA

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 726. INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD OF THE 
                   DEPARTMENTS OF DEFENSE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) despite repeated attempts at cooperation over the past 
     20 years, the Department of Defense and the Department of 
     Veterans Affairs have failed to implement a solution that 
     allows for seamless electronic sharing of medical health care 
     data;
       (2) the recent decision by the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs to abandon their earlier 
     agreement and pursue separate paths to integration 
     jeopardizes the stated goal of providing ``a patient-centered 
     health care system that delivers excellent quality, access, 
     satisfaction, and value, consistently across the 
     Departments'';
       (3) despite the repeated concerns and objections of the 
     congressional committees of jurisdiction, the Department of 
     Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs seem to be on 
     a continued path to fail in achieving the goal of creating a 
     seamless health record that integrates data across the 
     Departments; and
       (4) the President should make the necessary leadership 
     changes to assure timely completion of this requirement.
       (b) Implementation.--The Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall--
       (1) implement an integrated electronic health record to be 
     used by each of the Secretaries; and
       (2) deploy such record by not later than October 1, 2016.
       (c) Design Principles.--The integrated electronic health 
     record established under subsection (b) shall adhere to the 
     following principles:
       (1) To the extent practicable, efforts to establish such 
     record shall be based on objectives, activities, and 
     milestones established by the Joint Executive Committee Joint 
     Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2013-2015, including any 
     requirements, definition, documents, or analyses previously 
     developed to satisfy said Joint Strategic Plan.
       (2) Principles with respect to open architecture standards, 
     including--
       (A) modular designs based on standards with loose coupling 
     and high cohesion that allow for independent acquisition of 
     system components;
       (B) if existing national standards do not exist as of the 
     date on which the record is being established, the 
     Secretaries shall agree upon and adopt a standard for 
     purposes of the record until such time as national standards 
     are established;
       (C) enterprise investment strategies that maximize reuse of 
     proven system designs;
       (D) implementation of aggressive life-cycle sustainment 
     planning that uses proven technology insertion strategies and 
     product upgrade techniques;
       (E) enforcement of system design transparency, continuous 
     design disclosure and improvement, and peer reviews that 
     include government, academia, and industry; and
       (F) strategies for data-use rights to ensure a level 
     competitive playing field and access to alternative solutions 
     and sources across the life-cycle of the program.
       (3) By the point of full deployment decision, such record 
     must be at a generation 3 level or better for a health 
     information technology system.
       (d) Program Plan.--Not later than January 31, 2014, the 
     Secretaries shall jointly develop and submit to the 
     appropriate congressional committees a program plan for the 
     oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health 
     record program established under this section. This plan 
     shall include--
       (1) program objectives;
       (2) organization;
       (3) responsibilities of the Departments;
       (4) technical system requirements;
       (5) milestones, including a schedule for industry 
     competitions for capabilities needed to satisfy the technical 
     system requirements;
       (6) technical system standards being adopted by the 
     program;
       (7) outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the 
     performance and effectiveness of the program; and
       (8) level of funding for fiscal years 2014 through 2017.
       (e) Assessment.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretaries shall jointly commission 
     an independent assessment of the program plan under 
     subsection (d).
       (2) Submission.--Not later than 60 days after the date on 
     which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to 
     the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretaries 
     shall jointly submit to such committees the independent 
     assessment conducted under paragraph (1).
       (f) Limitation of Funds.--Not more than 25 percent of the 
     amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
     otherwise made available for development, modernization, or 
     enhancement of the integrated electronic health record within 
     the Department of Veterans Affairs or for operation and 
     maintenance for the Defense Health Agency of the Department 
     of Defense may be obligated or expended until the date on 
     which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to 
     the appropriate congressional committees.
       (g) Monthly Reporting.--On a monthly basis, the Secretary 
     of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans affairs shall each 
     submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 
     on the expenditures incurred by the Secretary in the 
     development of an integrated electronic health record under 
     this section. Such reports shall include obligations by major 
     categories of spending and by support of milestones 
     identified in the program plan required under subsection (d).
       (h) Requirements.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than October 1, 2014, all health 
     care information contained in the Department of Defense AHLTA 
     and the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA systems shall be 
     available and actionable in real-time to health care 
     providers in each Department through shared technology.
       (2) Certification.--At such time as the operational 
     capability described in paragraph (1) is achieved, the 
     Secretaries shall jointly certify to the appropriate 
     congressional committees that the Secretaries have 
     implemented such operational capability.
       (3) Limitation of funds.--Neither the Secretary of Defense 
     or the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may obligate or expend 
     more than 10 percent of the amounts authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the 
     research, development, test, and evaluation, or procurement 
     for the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record until the date on 
     which the certification is made under paragraph (2).
       (4) Responsible official.--The Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall each identify a senior 
     official to be responsible for the electronic health record 
     established under this section, including the operational 
     capability described in paragraph (1). Such official shall 
     have included within their performance evaluation performance 
     metrics related to the execution of the responsibilities 
     under this paragraph. Not later than 30 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary shall submit to 
     the appropriate congressional committees the name of the 
     senior official selected under this paragraph.
       (5) Accountability review.--If the Secretary of Defense and 
     the Secretary of Veterans Affairs fail to meet the 
     requirements under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall 
     jointly conduct an accountability review to identify the 
     following:
       (A) The root cause of the failure and if the failure is a 
     result of technology or human performance.
       (B) The work sections responsible for the failure.
       (C) The milestones and resource investment required to 
     achieve such requirements.
       (D) The recommendations for corrective actions, to include 
     personnel actions, to achieve such requirements.
       (6) Submission of accountability review.--If the 
     Secretaries conduct a review under paragraph (5), the 
     Secretaries shall jointly submit to the appropriate 
     congressional committees a report of the results of the 
     review by not later than November 30, 2014.
       (i) Advisory Panel.--
       (1) Establishment.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly 
     establish an advisory panel to support the development and 
     validation of requirements, programmatic assessment, and 
     other actions, as needed by the Secretaries, with respect to 
     the integrated electronic health record established under 
     subsection (b). The panel shall certify to the appropriate 
     congressional committees that such record meets the 
     definition of ``integrated'' as specified in subsection 
     (j)(4).
       (2) Membership.--The panel established under paragraph (1) 
     shall consist of not more than 14 members, appointed by the 
     Secretaries as follows:
       (A) Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of the 
     Secretaries.
       (B) The chief information officer of the Department of 
     Defense and the chief information officer of the Department 
     of Veterans Affairs.
       (C) One member from the acquisition community of the 
     Department of Defense and one member from such community of 
     the Department of Veterans Affairs.
       (D) Two members from the academic community appointed by 
     the Secretary of Defense.
       (E) Two members from the academic community appointed by 
     the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
       (F) Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of 
     Defense.
       (G) Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs.
       (3) Reporting.--The Advisory panel established under 
     paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
     committees a quarterly report on the activities of the panel. 
     The panel shall submit the first report by not later than 
     December 31, 2013.

[[Page 9104]]

       (j) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``actionable'' means information that is 
     directly useful to customers for immediate use in clinical 
     decision making.
       (2) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (A) the congressional defense committees; and
       (B) the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and 
     the House of Representatives.
       (3) The term ``generation 3'' means, with respect to an 
     electronic health systems, a system that has the technical 
     capability to bring evidence-based medicine to the point of 
     care and provide functionality for multiple care venues.
       (4) The term ``integrated'' means one single core 
     technology or an inherent cross-platform capability without 
     the need for additional patch development to accomplish this 
     capability.


        AMENDMENT NO. 90 OFFERED BY MR. WILSON OF SOUTH CAROLINA

       Page 308, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 726. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON RECOVERY AUDIT 
                   PROGRAM FOR TRICARE.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report that 
     evaluates the similarities and differences in the approaches 
     to identifying and recovering improper payments across 
     Medicare and TRICARE. The report shall contain an evaluation 
     of the following:
       (1) Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to 
     prevent improper payments by denying claims prior to payment.
       (2) Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to 
     correct improper payments post-payment.
       (3) The effectiveness of Medicare and TRICARE post-payment 
     audit programs in place to identify and correct improper 
     payments that are returned to the government plans.


          AMENDMENT NO. 91 OFFERED BY MR. SARBANES OF MARYLAND

       At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

     SEC. 833. REVISION OF DEFENSE SUPPLEMENT TO THE FEDERAL 
                   ACQUISITION REGULATION TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT 
                   SOURCING LAWS.

       Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal 
     Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to implement the 
     requirements imposed by sections 129, 129a, 2330a, 2461, and 
     2463 of title 10, United States Code.


         AMENDMENT NO. 98 OFFERED BY MR. CARDENAS OF CALIFORNIA

       Page 360, after line 8, insert the following new paragraph:
       (3) An assessment of the mechanisms for improving 
     recruitment, retention, and management of cyber operations 
     forces, including through focused recruiting; educational, 
     training, or certification scholarships; bonuses; or the use 
     of short-term or virtual deployments without the need for 
     permanent relocation.


         AMENDMENT NO. 99 OFFERED BY MR. CARDENAS OF CALIFORNIA

       Page 363, line 10, insert after ``investigation'' the 
     following: ``, an estimate of the economic losses from the 
     intrusion, and any additional actions needed to improve the 
     protection of intellectual property''.
       Page 363, line 24, insert after ``compromised,'' the 
     following: ``an estimate of the economic losses from the 
     intrusion,''.


          AMENDMENT NO. 100 OFFERED BY MR. RUIZ OF CALIFORNIA

       Page 365, after line 22, insert the following:

     SEC. 936. SMALL BUSINESS CYBERSECURITY SOLUTIONS OFFICE.

       (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit a 
     report to the Congress on the feasibility of establishing a 
     small business cyber technology office to assist small 
     business concerns in providing cybersecurity solutions to the 
     Federal Government.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``small 
     business concern'' has the meaning given such term in section 
     3 of the Small Business Act.


        AMENDMENT NO. 101 OFFERED BY MR. CARDENAS OF CALIFORNIA

       Page 365, after line 22, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 936. SMALL BUSINESS CYBER EDUCATION.

       The Secretary of Defense shall establish an outreach and 
     education program to assist small businesses (as defined in 
     section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) 
     contracted by the Department of Defense to assist such 
     businesses to--
       (1) understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats;
       (2) develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and
       (3) develop a plan to protect the networks of such 
     businesses.


       AMENDMENT NO. 103 OFFERED BY MR. LANGEVIN OF RHODE ISLAND

       Page 385, after line 2, insert the following:

     SEC. 1035. REPORT COMPARING COSTS OF DDG 1000 AND DDG 51 
                   FLIGHT III SHIPS.

        Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy 
     shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     providing an updated comparison of the costs and risks of 
     acquiring DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for 
     enhanced ballistic missile defense capability. The report 
     shall include each of the following:
       (1) An updated estimate of the total cost to develop, 
     procure, operate, and support ballistic missile defense 
     capable DDG 1000 destroyers equipped with the air and missile 
     defense radar that would be procured in addition to the three 
     prior-year-funded DDG 1000 class ships, and in lieu of Flight 
     III DDG-51 destroyers.
       (2) The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost of the 
     current plan to develop, procure, operate, and support Flight 
     III DDG 51 destroyers.
       (3) Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense 
     requirements and construction schedules for both the DDG 1000 
     and DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to in paragraphs 
     (1) and (2), respectively.
       (4) An updated comparison of the program risks and the 
     resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not just 
     ballistic missile defense) of the options referred to in 
     paragraphs (1) and (2).
       (5) Any other information the Secretary determines 
     appropriate.


          AMENDMENT NO. 104 OFFERED BY MR. CONYERS OF MICHIGAN

       Page 401, line 23, add at the end before the period the 
     following: ``for purposes of interpreting the scope of 
     section 2 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force 
     (Public Law 107-40; 115 Stat. 224; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note)''.


            AMENDMENT NO. 105 OFFERED BY MR. ROSS OF FLORIDA

       Page 405, after line 9, insert the following:

     SEC. 1040B. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR RECREATIONAL 
                   FACILITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT 
                   GUANTANAMO.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
     otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be used 
     to provide additional or upgraded recreational facilities for 
     individuals detained at United States Naval Station, 
     Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


           AMENDMENT NO. 109 OFFERED BY MR. POSEY OF FLORIDA

       Page 452, after line 6, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 1082A. TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES TO MEMBERS OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES FROM NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Chapter 20 of title 10, United States 
     Code, is amended by inserting after section 402 the following 
     new section:

     ``Sec. 403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit 
       organizations

       ``(a) Authorization of Transportation.--Notwithstanding any 
     other provision of law, and subject to subsection (b), the 
     Secretary of Defense may transport to any country, without 
     charge, supplies that have been furnished by a nonprofit 
     organization and that are intended for distribution to 
     members of the armed forces. Such supplies may be transported 
     only on a space available basis.
       ``(b) Limitations.--(1) The Secretary may not transport 
     supplies under subsection (a) unless the Secretary determines 
     that--
       ``(A) the transportation of the supplies is consistent with 
     the policies of the United States;
       ``(B) the supplies are suitable for distribution to members 
     of the armed forces and are in usable condition;
       ``(C) there is a legitimate need for the supplies by the 
     members of the armed forces for whom they are intended; and
       ``(D) adequate arrangements have been made for the 
     distribution and use of the supplies.
       ``(2) Procedures.--The Secretary shall establish procedures 
     for making the determinations required under paragraph (1). 
     Such procedures shall include inspection of supplies before 
     acceptance for transport.
       ``(3) Preparation.--It shall be the responsibility of the 
     nonprofit organization requesting the transport of supplies 
     under this section to ensure that the supplies are suitable 
     for transport.
       ``(c) Distribution.--Supplies transported under this 
     section may be distributed by the United States Government or 
     a nonprofit organization.
       ``(d) Definition of Nonprofit Organization.--In this 
     section, the term `nonprofit organization' means an 
     organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) 
     of such Code.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
     beginning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by inserting 
     after the item relating to section 402 the following new 
     item:

``403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit organizations.''.


           AMENDMENT NO. 112 OFFERED BY MR. HANNA OF NEW YORK

       Page 463, after line 6, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the use of improvised explosive devices (in this 
     section referred to as ``IEDs'') against members of the Armed 
     Forces or

[[Page 9105]]

     people of the United States should be condemned;
       (2) unwavering support for members of the Armed Forces, 
     first responders, and explosive ordnance disposal personnel 
     of the United States who face the threat of IEDs and put 
     their lives on the line to defeat them should be expressed;
       (3) all relevant agencies of the Government should be 
     called on to coordinate with international partners and other 
     responsible entities to reduce the use of IEDs and curb their 
     proliferation; and
       (4) the exchange of blast trauma research data should be 
     facilitated between all relevant agencies of the Government.


          AMENDMENT NO. 115 OFFERED BY MR. COLLINS OF NEW YORK

       Page 463, after line 6, insert the following:

     SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS TO MAINTAIN A STRONG NATIONAL 
                   GUARD AND MILITARY RESERVE FORCE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) The first volunteer militia unit in America was formed 
     in 1636 in Massachusetts Bay, followed by other units in the 
     colonies of Virginia and Connecticut. the American founding 
     fathers wrote article I, section 8, of the United States 
     Constitution to keep the militia model, authorizing a 
     standing military force that could organize, train, and equip 
     militia volunteers when needed.
       (2) In World War I, nearly all National Guardsmen were 
     mobilized into Federal service, and while they represented 
     only 15 percent of the total United States Army, they 
     comprised 40 percent of the American divisions sent to France 
     and sustained 43 percent of the casualties in combat. In 
     World War II, the National Guard comprised 19 Army divisions 
     and 29 observation squadrons with aircraft assigned to the 
     United States Army Air Forces.
       (3) On September 11, 2001, the first fighter jets over New 
     York City and Washington, DC, were Air National Guard F-15 
     and F-16 aircraft from Massachusetts and North Dakota, with 
     over 400 more Air National Guard fighter aircraft on alert by 
     that afternoon. Over 600,000 Air and Army National Guard 
     soldiers and airmen have deployed in the many campaigns since 
     9/11.
       (4) Air and Army National Guard soldiers and airmen have 
     been involved in countless domestic response missions, 
     including missions in response to hurricanes, tornadoes, 
     floods, and forest fires including the more recent events of 
     Superstorm Sandy and the tornados in Oklahoma.
       (5) The volunteer National Guard and Reserve have time and 
     again demonstrated their readiness to meet operational 
     requirements through cost-effective means.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the Secretary of Defense should make every effort to 
     ensure the Military Reserve and National Guard forces are 
     sustained by a fully manned and fully funded force and that 
     the United States fulfill its longstanding commitment to 
     unyielding readiness in terms of defense;
       (2) the Secretary of Defense should act with the knowledge 
     that the National Guard and Reserve are critical components 
     to the Armed Forces, particularly as means of preserving 
     combat power during a time of budget austerity; and
       (3) Congress repudiates proposals to diminish the National 
     Guard or Reserve and affirms the growth of these components 
     as circumstances warrant.


       AMENDMENT NO. 119 OFFERED BY MR. LANGEVIN OF RHODE ISLAND

       At the end of title XI, add the following new section:

     SEC. 1108. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF 
                   FUNDING FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL.

       (a) Regulations.--No later than 45 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
     prescribe regulations implementing the authority in 
     subsection (a) of section 1111 of the National Defense 
     Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 
     U.S.C. 1580 note prec.).
       (b) Coordination.--The Under Secretary of Defense 
     (Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of 
     Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for 
     coordinating the preparation of the regulations required 
     under subsection (a).
       (c) Limitations.--The regulations required under subsection 
     (a) shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time 
     equivalent or end-strength limitation, nor shall such 
     regulations require offsetting civilian pay funding, civilian 
     full-time equivalents, or end-strength.


       AMENDMENT NO. 121 OFFERED BY MR. ROHRABACHER OF CALIFORNIA

       Page 490, after line 6, add the following new subparagraph:
       (C) That Pakistan is not using its military or any funds or 
     equipment provided by the United States to persecute minority 
     groups for their legitimate and nonviolent political and 
     religious beliefs, including the Balochi, Sindhi, and Hazara 
     ethnic groups and minority religious groups, including 
     Christian, Hindu, and Ahmadiyya Muslim.


        AMENDMENT NO. 142 OFFERED BY MS. ROS-LEHTINEN OF FLORIDA

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII (page 551, after line 
     12), add the following new section:

     SEC. 1259. COMBATING CRIME THROUGH INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES.

       The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy assets, 
     personnel, and resources to the Joint Interagency Task Force 
     South, in coordination with SOUTHCOM, to combat the following 
     by supplying sufficient intelligence capabilities:
       (1) Transnational criminal organizations.
       (2) Drug trafficking.
       (3) Bulk shipments of narcotics or currency.
       (4) Narco-terrorism.
       (5) Human trafficking.
       (6) The Iranian presence in the Western Hemisphere.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Larsen) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I urge the committee to adopt the amendments 
en bloc, all of which have been examined by the majority and the 
minority.
  At this time I yield 2 minutes to my friend and colleague, the 
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Kelly).
  Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania. I rise today with an amendment that will 
be considered later tonight that creates a 1-year ban on the use of 
funds by the Department of Defense to implement the U.N. Arms Trade 
Treaty, unless the ATT fulfills all constitutional and legal 
requirements needed to take domestic legal effect, including the 
passage of implementing legislation.
  Over the last year, I have been joined by over 140 bipartisan Members 
of this body to express deep concerns with the United Nations Arms 
Trade Treaty and to urge its rejection.
  First, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty undermines our Second 
Amendment rights by omitting the fundamental, individual right to keep 
and bear arms and imposing a national responsibility to prevent 
firearms diversion, thus opening the door to new gun control measures.
  Secondly, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty undermines our 
sovereignty by imposing vague, readily politicized requirements on the 
United States and inviting United Nations-led investigations into what 
U.S. policymakers knew or should have known regarding arms transfers 
that allegedly violate the United Nations arms trade treaty.
  Ultimately, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty will stop the good 
from doing good without stopping the bad from doing bad. As then-
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton once said, the U.S. maintains the 
``gold standard'' of arms export controls.
  My amendment upholds our current policies, as well as our enduring 
values.
  I would like to thank the chairman and the ranking member for 
including this amendment in the en bloc amendments.
  With that, I urge adoption of this amendment.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I too, encourage my colleagues 
to support this en bloc, and I now yield 3 minutes to Mr. Ellison from 
Minnesota.
  Mr. ELLISON. Madam Chairman, allow me to thank the ranking member and 
the chair of the committee.
  This graphic I have in front of me, Madam Chairman, was taken in 
Tahrir Square a few years ago now when the people were peacefully 
demonstrating to overcome the Mubarak regime which had oppressed them 
for so many years. They're holding up tear gas, and it says ``Made in 
America'' on it.
  When our government transferred those riot and anti-riot materials to 
that government, I believe we didn't have any reason to know that it 
would be misused by a tyrannical regime to oppress and down press 
peaceful demonstrators. I propose, though, that when our government has 
reason to know that there is a tyrannical regime using repressive 
techniques to put down their peaceful demonstrators, that our 
government should withhold exports of that nature.
  The fact is that the tyranny that people lived under under Hosni 
Mubarak was not made in America. It was

[[Page 9106]]

made by Hosni Mubarak. But we should not be implicated in the kind of 
oppression if we know about it, and therefore I think we should have 
the authority in our government to withhold those kinds of transfers 
when they come to our attention.
  So the young man holding up this tear gas canister that police fired 
at the pro-democracy demonstrators is labeled ``Made in the USA.'' This 
is a misrepresentation because it was Mubarak who oppressed his own 
people, but we should not be implicated in this, particularly if we 
have reason to know.
  Madam Chairman, this is not the message we should be sending. Whether 
it's being sent deliberately or not, it's not the message we should 
send to the people who are seeking nothing more than what we want in 
the United States, which is to democratically control their own 
country. It's not in our interest, and we should have the authority to 
stop it.
  The United States should not supply tear gas to governments that use 
it to repress democracy, and my amendment helps us to move to that 
goal.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, at this time, we have no further speakers.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, we yield back the balance of 
our time.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I ask that all of our colleagues support 
this group of en bloc amendments, and I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. ROSS. Madam Chair, I rise today to thank Chairman McKeon and 
Ranking Member Smith for their hard work on this important legislation, 
and to speak in support of my amendment to the National Defense 
Authorization Act.
  My amendment is very simple and straightforward--it would prohibit 
the Department of Defense from using taxpayer funds to provide 
additional or upgraded recreational facilities for detainees at U.S. 
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
  I cannot help but remember that the federal government wasted 
$750,000 last year to build a recreational soccer field in Guantanamo 
Bay for detainees. I thought it was a ridiculous idea then, and I think 
it is a ridiculous idea now.
  At a time when we have an out-of-control backlog of Veterans claims 
pending a decision--taxpayer funding was wasted building a soccer field 
for terrorists?
  At a time when the President's Administration is proposing to 
drastically raise TRICARE fees on service members and their families--
$750,000 were spent to improve the recreational facilities for 
terrorist detainees?
  At a time when we can't give seniors a fair cost-of-living increase 
in benefits?
  Or at a time when families across the country are making tough 
cutbacks in their own budgets, we're building soccer fields in Cuba?
  Guantanamo Bay is a detention facility for terrorists captured on the 
battlefield or apprehended actively planning to do harm to Americans.
  As such, Guantanamo Bay should not be a place of comfort; rather, it 
should house the world's most dangerous terrorists in a humane way, 
providing only the bare essentials.
  Our Founding Fathers made it clear that the federal government has no 
higher duty than to ``provide for the common defense.''
  Rather than balancing the budget on the backs of our military, 
Department of Defense employees, seniors, and families, Congress should 
prevent wasteful projects like this--period.
  Once again, I want to thank the Chair and Ranking Member for their 
work on this legislation, and encourage my colleagues to join me in 
passing this fiscally responsible amendment to ensure taxpayer's funds 
are not used to construct or upgrade recreational facilities for 
terrorist detainees.
  Mr. CONYERS. Madam Chair, I rise to discuss my amendment, number 104, 
to H.R. 1960, the ``National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2014.'' I would like to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith 
for accepting this amendment in en bloc amendment number five.
  This technical amendment would improve Section 1036 of the underlying 
bill, which requires the President to provide information to Congress 
as to which organizations it believes are affiliates or adherents of 
Al-Qaeda, the reasoning justifying such designation, and whether each 
group constitutes an associated force that is engaged in hostilities 
against the United States or its coalition partners. My amendment 
addresses the latter part of this assessment dealing with so-called 
``associated forces'' affiliated with Al-Qaeda or the Taliban.
  The 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force passed shortly 
after the 9/11 attacks has been interpreted by the last two 
Administrations as authorizing war between the United States and Al-
Qaeda, the Taliban, and co-belligerent ``associated forces.'' Although 
we clearly know who Al-Qaeda or the Taliban are, it is unclear which 
organizations the Executive Branch is referring to when referencing 
``associated forces.'' This absence of transparency as to the 
government's application of this legal concept allows for the 
possibility that the United States could rely on the AUMF as a broad, 
nearly limitless source of authority for military operations, including 
drone strikes, against groups that have little to no connection to the 
September 11 attacks in places like Mali, Somalia, or even Syria.
  It is my understanding that Section 1036 of the bill attempts to 
address this ambiguity by attempting to discern the Administration's 
thinking about which groups it considers engaged in hostilities against 
our country. Unfortunately, it is unclear if Section 1036 is asking for 
information about ``associated forces'' for the purposes of 
interpreting the 2001 AUMF or simply seeking information about groups 
that affiliate with Al-Qaeda or the Taliban in a different context. 
This distinction is critically important, because the United States is 
only technically at war with ``associated forces'' covered by the 2001 
AUMF and not with groups that have some other affiliation with Al-Qaeda 
or the Taliban.
  My amendment eliminates this ambiguity by explicitly requiring the 
President to provide information about organizations it considers to be 
``associated forces'' for the purposes of interpreting this war 
authorization. In doing so, it should help the Congress understand the 
scope of this outdated law, which has been interpreted by the Executive 
Branch and the courts in an overbroad manner, and ensure that it is not 
being used to justify uses of force unauthorized by and inconsistent 
with Congress, the Constitution, and international law.
  Again, I thank my colleagues for supporting my amendment.
  Mr. PASCRELL. Madam Chair, it has been over 10 years since the start 
of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and I fear we are still not 
properly addressing traumatic brain injury, also known as ``the 
signature injury of the war.'' I would like to thank Chairman McKeon 
and Ranking Member Smith for their commitment to this issue in recent 
authorizations. I would also like to thank Mr. Thompson for his 
cosponsorship of my first amendment.
  Over the last few years, Congress has continued to emphasize the 
importance of this issue and has made funds available for the 
identification and treatment of brain injuries in our soldiers. It is 
important these funds be used wisely to ensure that our men and women 
in uniform are getting timely and proper care. A January 2012 GAO 
report highlighted the need to coordinate TBI and psychological health 
activities within the Department.
  In the National Defense Authorization for FY 2013, Congress mandated 
that the Secretary of Defense submit a plan to Congress that would 
improve coordination and integration of the programs that address 
traumatic brain injury and psychological health of members of the Armed 
Forces. Specifically, this report would require the identification of 
gaps in services and treatments, a plan for addressing any gaps or 
redundancies and identifying an official to lead the implementation of 
any changes. This report is due in July of this year, and my amendment 
underscores the importance of this mandated report, and strongly urges 
the Secretary to deliver it to Congress within the appropriate 
timeframe.
  My second amendment addresses the continuing issue of identification 
of traumatic brain injuries. Although the Department of Defense has 
made a strong commitment to identifying, and treating those men and 
women who have suffered a traumatic brain injury while serving our 
Nation, there are still problems with screening our troops.
  In June 2010, a memorandum issued by the Department of Defense made a 
50-meter distance from an explosion the criterion to identify, refer, 
and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury in theater. 
However, the Department of Defense has yet to address those service 
members who may have been exposed to a blast prior to that time. Many 
of these soldiers remain on active duty and we must ensure they are 
tested and treated. My amendment mandates a report on how the Secretary 
of Defense will identify, refer, and treat possible traumatic brain 
injuries with respect to members of the Armed Forces who served in 
Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom prior to June 
2010. This is a vitally important report for ensuring the health of our 
troops. I ask that my colleagues support these amendments for those 
service

[[Page 9107]]

members who are struggling with invisible wounds.
  Mr. ROHRABACHER. Madam Chair, included in this en bloc package is an 
amendment I offered that relates to Pakistan. It adds, as a condition 
of aid to Pakistan, that Islamabad must not use the funding we provide 
to its security forces for purposes of domestic repression of ethnic 
and religious minority groups as it has in the past.
  The State Department's 2012 Country Report on Human Rights in 
Pakistan states, ``The most serious human rights problems were 
extrajudicial and targeted killings, forced disappearances, and 
torture, which affected thousands of citizens in nearly all parts of 
the country.'' Members of the Pakistani military as well as police are 
involved in these lethal abuses of human rights.
  Repression of minority groups is systemic. Human rights organizations 
have reported that many Sindhi and Baloch nationalists were among those 
missing. Non-Sunni religious practitioners, Christians, Ahmadis, and 
Shia Muslims, are attacked with impunity.
  There are already four conditions in the core bill and my amendment 
simply adds a fifth requirement to prevent the misuse of our aid. Thank 
you, Madam Chair, for accepting my amendment.
  Mr. POSEY. Madam Chair, I'm pleased to rise today in support of my 
bipartisan bill, the Deployed Troops Support Act, which has been 
accepted as an Amendment to H.R. 1960, the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
  I would like to thank House Armed Services Committee Chairman McKeon 
and Ranking Member Smith for their support in helping this important 
Amendment to move forward. I would also like to thank the cosponsors of 
H.R. 1756, the Deployed Troops Support Act for their support: Frederica 
Wilson of Florida, Dennis Ross of Florida, Louis Gohmert of Texas, 
William Enyart of Illinois, Christopher Gibson of New York, Kerry 
Bentivolio of Mississippi, Donna Christensen of the U.S. Virgin 
Islands, Larry Bucshon of Indiana, and Derek Kilmer of Washington.
  Mr. Chairman, when our soldiers are deployed to defend our Nation, 
many patriotic Americans show their support for our brave men and women 
in uniform by putting together care packages. This Amendment simply 
allows the Department of Defense to transport, on a space available 
basis, goods supplied by nonprofit organizations to members of the 
Armed Services who are deployed overseas.
  This Amendment gives veterans' nonprofits and other private 
charitable organizations that support our troops the same consideration 
that organizations are already given for transporting humanitarian 
goods to foreign nationals overseas. In this Amendment, we extend the 
same courtesy for our own troops that we have granted to foreigners 
under the ``Denton Program'' since 1985.
  We also ensure that the Secretary has the authority to determine that 
there is a legitimate need for the goods being shipped, that supplies 
are suitable for distribution, and that adequate arrangements have been 
made for distribution.
  This legislative idea was brought to my attention by veterans in my 
congressional district, specifically AVET Project in Brevard County. I 
especially commend Garren and Kim Cone and the members of AVET for 
their service to our Nation and their support for our soldiers. Again, 
thanks to everyone involved for helping to advance this common sense 
Amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.


             Amendments En Bloc No. 6 Offered by Mr.McKeon

  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chairman, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer 
amendments en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 6 consisting of amendment Nos. 106, 108, 110, 
116, 117, 118, 120, 127, 128, 129, 132, 133, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140 
and 145, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of 
California:


            Amendment No. 106 Offered by Mr. Braley of Iowa

       At the end of subtitle H of title X, insert the following:

     SEC. 1080. REPORT ON LONG-TERM COSTS OF OPERATION IRAQI 
                   FREEDOM AND OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM.

       (a) Report Requirement.--Not later than 90 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the President, with 
     contributions from the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 
     State, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit to 
     Congress a report containing an estimate of previous costs of 
     Operation New Dawn (the successor contingency operation to 
     Operation Iraqi Freedom) and the long-term costs of Operation 
     Enduring Freedom for a scenario, determined by the President 
     and based on current contingency operation and withdrawal 
     plans, that takes into account expected force levels and the 
     expected length of time that members of the Armed Forces will 
     be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
       (b) Estimates to Be Used in Preparation of Report.--In 
     preparing the report required by subsection (a), the 
     President shall make estimates and projections through at 
     least fiscal year 2023, adjust any dollar amounts 
     appropriately for inflation, and take into account and 
     specify each of the following:
       (1) The total number of members of the Armed Forces 
     expected to be deployed in support of Operation Enduring 
     Freedom, including--
       (A) the number of members of the Armed Forces actually 
     deployed in Southwest Asia in support of Operation Enduring 
     Freedom;
       (B) the number of members of reserve components of the 
     Armed Forces called or ordered to active duty in the United 
     States for the purpose of training for eventual deployment in 
     Southwest Asia, backfilling for deployed troops, or 
     supporting other Department of Defense missions directly or 
     indirectly related to Operation Enduring Freedom; and
       (C) the break-down of deployments of members of the regular 
     and reserve components and activation of members of the 
     reserve components.
       (2) The number of members of the Armed Forces, including 
     members of the reserve components, who have previously served 
     in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or 
     Operation Enduring Freedom and who are expected to serve 
     multiple deployments.
       (3) The number of contractors and private military security 
     firms that have been used and are expected to be used during 
     the course of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, 
     and Operation Enduring Freedom.
       (4) The number of veterans currently suffering and expected 
     to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic 
     brain injury, or other mental injuries.
       (5) The number of veterans currently in need of and 
     expected to be in need of prosthetic care and treatment 
     because of amputations incurred during service in support of 
     Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation 
     Enduring Freedom.
       (6) The current number of pending Department of Veterans 
     Affairs claims from veterans of military service in Iraq and 
     Afghanistan, and the total number of such veterans expected 
     to seek disability compensation from the Department of 
     Veterans Affairs.
       (7) The total number of members of the Armed Forces who 
     have been killed or wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan, including 
     noncombat casualties, the total number of members expected to 
     suffer injuries in Afghanistan, and the total number of 
     members expected to be killed in Afghanistan, including 
     noncombat casualties.
       (8) The amount of funds previously appropriated for the 
     Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the 
     Department of Veterans Affairs for costs related to Operation 
     Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring 
     Freedom, including an account of the amount of funding from 
     regular Department of Defense, Department of State, and 
     Department of Veterans Affairs budgets that has gone and will 
     go to costs associated with such operations.
       (9) Previous, current, and future operational expenditures 
     associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and, when 
     applicable, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn, 
     including--
       (A) funding for combat operations;
       (B) deploying, transporting, feeding, and housing members 
     of the Armed Forces (including fuel costs);
       (C) activation and deployment of members of the reserve 
     components of the Armed Forces;
       (D) equipping and training of Iraqi and Afghan forces;
       (E) purchasing, upgrading, and repairing weapons, 
     munitions, and other equipment consumed or used in Operation 
     Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring 
     Freedom; and
       (F) payments to other countries for logistical assistance 
     in support of such operations.
       (10) Past, current, and future costs of entering into 
     contracts with private military security firms and other 
     contractors for the provision of goods and services 
     associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, 
     and Operation Enduring Freedom.
       (11) Average annual cost for each member of the Armed 
     Forces deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, 
     including room and board, equipment and body armor, 
     transportation of troops and equipment (including fuel 
     costs), and operational costs.
       (12) Current and future cost of combat-related special pays 
     and benefits, including reenlistment bonuses.
       (13) Current and future cost of calling or ordering members 
     of the reserve components

[[Page 9108]]

     to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
       (14) Current and future cost for reconstruction, embassy 
     operations and construction, and foreign aid programs for 
     Iraq and Afghanistan.
       (15) Current and future cost of bases and other 
     infrastructure to support members of the Armed Forces serving 
     in Afghanistan.
       (16) Current and future cost of providing health care for 
     veterans who served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, 
     Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom, 
     including--
       (A) the cost of mental health treatment for veterans 
     suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic 
     brain injury, and other mental problems as a result of such 
     service; and
       (B) the cost of lifetime prosthetics care and treatment for 
     veterans suffering from amputations as a result of such 
     service.
       (17) Current and future cost of providing Department of 
     Veterans Affairs disability benefits for the lifetime of 
     veterans who incur disabilities while serving in support of 
     Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation 
     Enduring Freedom.
       (18) Current and future cost of providing survivors' 
     benefits to survivors of members of the Armed Forces killed 
     while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, 
     Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
       (19) Cost of bringing members of the Armed Forces and 
     equipment back to the United States upon the conclusion of 
     Operation Enduring Freedom, including the cost of 
     demobilization, transportation costs (including fuel costs), 
     providing transition services for members of the Armed Forces 
     transitioning from active duty to veteran status, 
     transporting equipment, weapons, and munitions (including 
     fuel costs), and an estimate of the value of equipment that 
     will be left behind.
       (20) Cost to restore the military and military equipment, 
     including the equipment of the reserve components, to full 
     strength after the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom.
       (21) Amount of money borrowed to pay for Operation Iraqi 
     Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, 
     and the sources of that money.
       (22) Interest on money borrowed, including interest for 
     money already borrowed and anticipated interest payments on 
     future borrowing, for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New 
     Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.


         Amendment No. 108 Offered by Mr. Andrews of New Jersey

       Page 447, line 20, strike ``is capable and available'' and 
     insert ``are available and capable''.
       Page 449, line 5, insert ``or subcontract'' after 
     ``contract''.


         Amendment No. 110 Offered by Ms. Speier of California

       Add at the end of subtitle I of title X the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 1090. ACCESS OF EMPLOYEES OF CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT 
                   OFFICES TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES.

       (a) Finding.--Congress finds that Congressional support 
     offices perform a critical role in enabling Congress to carry 
     out its Constitutionally mandated task of performing 
     oversight of the executive branch.
       (b) Access in Same Manner as Employees of Defense 
     Committees.--The Secretary of Defense shall provide employees 
     of any Congressional support office who work on issues 
     related to national security with access to facilities of the 
     Department of Defense in the same manner, and subject to the 
     same terms and conditions, as employees of the Committees on 
     Armed Services of the House of Representatives and Senate.
       (c) Congressional Support Offices Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``Congressional support office'' means any 
     of the following:
       (1) The Congressional Budget Office.
       (2) The Congressional Research Service of the Library of 
     Congress.
       (3) The Government Accountability Office.


           Amendment No. 116 Offered by Mr. Lewis of Georgia

       At the end of title X, add the following new section:

     SEC. 10__. COST OF WARS.

       The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 
     Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Director 
     of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, shall post on the public 
     Web site of the Department of Defense the costs, including 
     the relevant legacy costs, to each American taxpayer of each 
     of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.


          Amendment No. 117 Offered by Mr. Farr of California

       At the end of title X, insert the following:

     SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF 
                   FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES IN THE BUILDING 
                   OF PARTNER CAPACITY.

       It is the sense of Congress that the head of each element 
     of the Department of Defense should take into consideration 
     foreign languages and cultures during the development by such 
     element of the Department of training, tools, and 
     methodologies to engage in military-to-military activities 
     and in the building of partner capacity.


           Amendment No. 118 Offered by Mr. Gallego of Texas

       At the end of title XI, add the following new section:

     SEC. 11__. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED APPOINTMENT AND COMPENSATION 
                   AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL FOR CARE AND 
                   TREATMENT OF WOUNDED AND INJURED MEMBERS OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Extension.--Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 
     10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``December 31, 
     2015'' both places it appears and inserting ``December 31, 
     2020''.
       (b) Repeal of Fulfilled Requirement.--Such section is 
     further amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (b); and
       (2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by 
     subsection (a), as subsection (b).
       (c) Repeal of References to Certain Title 5 Authorities.--
     Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended--
       (1) by striking ``sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title 
     5'' and inserting ``section 3304 of title 5''; and
       (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``the authorities in such 
     sections'' and inserting ``the authority in such section''.


         Amendment No. 120 Offered by Mr. Connolly of Virginia

       At the end of subtitle A of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, 
                   DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID PROGRAMS OF THE 
                   DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

       (a) In General.--Of the amounts authorized to be 
     appropriated by this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404, 
     407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code, up to 5 
     percent of such amounts may be made available to conduct 
     monitoring and evaluation of programs conducted pursuant to 
     such authorities during fiscal year 2014.
       (b) Briefing.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide 
     a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on 
     mechanisms to evaluate the programs conducted pursuant to the 
     authorities listed in subsection (a). The briefing shall 
     include the following:
       (1) A description of how the Department of Defense 
     evaluates program and project outcomes and impact, including 
     cost effectiveness and extent to which programs meet 
     designated goals.
       (2) An analysis of steps taken to implement the 
     recommendations from the following reports:
       (A) The Government Accountability Office's Report entitled 
     ``Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed 
     to Manage the Military's Efforts''.
       (B) The Department of Defense Inspector General Report 
     numbered ``DODIG-2012-119''.
       (C) The RAND Corporation's Report prepared for the Office 
     of the Secretary of Defense entitled ``Developing a Prototype 
     Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense 
     Humanitarian Assistance Projects''.
       (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``appropriate 
     congressional committees'' means the following:
       (1) The congressional defense committees.
       (2) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
     Senate.


           Amendment No. 127 Offered by Mr. Grimm of New York

       At the end of subtitle D of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON CONDEMNING THE GOVERNMENT OF 
                   IRAN FOR ITS STATE-SPONSORED PERSECUTION OF ITS 
                   BAHA'I MINORITY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) In 1982, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 2000, 
     2006, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2013, Congress declared that it 
     deplored the religious persecution by the Government of Iran 
     of the Baha'i community and would hold the Government of Iran 
     responsible for upholding the rights of all Iranian 
     nationals, including members of the Baha'i faith.
       (2) The United States Commission on International Religious 
     Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``The Baha'i community has long 
     been subject to particularly severe religious freedom 
     violations in Iran. Baha'is, who number at least 300,000, are 
     viewed as `heretics' by Iranian authorities and may face 
     repression on the grounds of apostasy.''.
       (3) The United States Commission on International Religious 
     Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``Since 1979, Iranian government 
     authorities have killed more than 200 Baha'i leaders in Iran 
     and dismissed more than 10,000 from government and university 
     jobs.''.
       (4) The United States Commission on International Religious 
     Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``Baha'is may not establish 
     places of worship, schools, or any independent religious 
     associations in Iran.''.
       (5) The United States Commission on International Religious 
     Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``Baha'is are barred from the 
     military and denied government jobs and pensions as well as 
     the right to inherit property. Their marriages and divorces 
     also are not recognized, and they have difficulty obtaining

[[Page 9109]]

     death certificates. Baha'i cemeteries, holy places, and 
     community properties are often seized or desecrated, and many 
     important religious sites have been destroyed.''.
       (6) The United States Commission on International Religious 
     Freedom 2012 Report stated, ``The Baha'i community faces 
     severe economic pressure, including denials of jobs in both 
     the public and private sectors and of business licenses. 
     Iranian authorities often pressure employers of Baha'is to 
     dismiss them from employment in the private sector.''.
       (7) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated, ``The government prohibits Baha'is 
     from teaching and practicing their faith and subjects them to 
     many forms of discrimination that followers of other 
     religions do not face.''.
       (8) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated, ``According to law, Baha'i blood is 
     considered `mobah', meaning it can be spilled with 
     impunity.''.
       (9) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated that ``members of religious minorities, 
     with the exception of Baha'is, can serve in lower ranks of 
     government employment'', and ``Baha'is are barred from all 
     leadership positions in the government and military''.
       (10) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated, ``Baha'is suffered frequent government 
     harassment and persecution, and their property rights 
     generally were disregarded. The government raided Baha'i 
     homes and businesses and confiscated large amounts of private 
     and commercial property, as well as religious materials 
     belonging to Baha'is.''.
       (11) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated, ``Baha'is also are required to 
     register with the police''.
       (12) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated that ``[p]ublic and private 
     universities continued to deny admittance to and expelled 
     Baha'i students'' and ``[d]uring the year, at least 30 
     Baha'is were barred or expelled from universities on 
     political or religious grounds''.
       (13) The Department of State 2011 International Religious 
     Freedom Report stated, ``Baha'is are regularly denied 
     compensation for injury or criminal victimization.''.
       (14) On March 6, 2012, the United Nations Special 
     Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic 
     Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/19/66), which stated 
     that ``the Special Rapporteur continues to be alarmed by 
     communications that demonstrate the systemic and systematic 
     persecution of members of unrecognized religious communities, 
     particularly the Baha'i community, in violation of 
     international conventions'' and expressed concern regarding 
     ``an intensive defamation campaign meant to incite 
     discrimination and hate against Baha'is''.
       (15) On May 23, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-General 
     issued a report, which stated that ``the Special Rapporteur 
     on freedom of religion or belief . . . pointed out that the 
     Islamic Republic of Iran had a policy of systematic 
     persecution of persons belonging to the Baha'i faith, 
     excluding them from the application of freedom of religion or 
     belief by simply denying that their faith had the status of a 
     religion''.
       (16) On August 22, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-
     General issued a report, which stated, ``The international 
     community continues to express concerns about the very 
     serious discrimination against ethnic and religious 
     minorities in law and in practice, in particular the Baha'i 
     community. The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human 
     rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran expressed alarm about 
     the systemic and systematic persecution of members of the 
     Baha'i community, including severe socioeconomic pressure and 
     arrests and detention. He also deplored the Government's 
     tolerance of an intensive defamation campaign aimed at 
     inciting discrimination and hate against Baha'is.''.
       (17) On September 13, 2012, the United Nations Special 
     Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic 
     Republic of Iran issued a report (A/67/369), which stated, 
     ``Reports and interviews submitted to the Special Rapporteur 
     also continue to portray a disturbing trend with regard to 
     religious freedom in the country. Members of both recognized 
     and unrecognized religions have reported various levels of 
     intimidation, arrest, detention and interrogation that focus 
     on their religious beliefs.'', and stated, ``At the time of 
     drafting the report, 105 members of the Baha'i community were 
     reported to be in detention.''.
       (18) On November 27, 2012, the Third Committee of the 
     United Nations General Assembly adopted a draft resolution 
     (A/C.3/67/L.51), which noted, ``[I]ncreased persecution and 
     human rights violations against persons belonging to 
     unrecognized religious minorities, particularly members of 
     the Baha'i faith and their defenders, including escalating 
     attacks, an increase in the number of arrests and detentions, 
     the restriction of access to higher education on the basis of 
     religion, the sentencing of twelve Baha'is associated with 
     Baha'i educational institutions to lengthy prison terms, the 
     continued denial of access to employment in the public 
     sector, additional restrictions on participation in the 
     private sector, and the de facto criminalization of 
     membership in the Baha'i faith.''.
       (19) On December 20, 2012, the United Nations General 
     Assembly adopted a resolution (A/RES/67/182), which called 
     upon the government of Iran ``[t]o eliminate discrimination 
     against, and exclusion of . . . members of the Baha'i Faith, 
     regarding access to higher education, and to eliminate the 
     criminalization of efforts to provide higher education to 
     Baha'i youth denied access to Iranian universities,'' and 
     ``to accord all Baha'is, including those imprisoned because 
     of their beliefs, the due process of law and the rights that 
     they are constitutionally guaranteed''.
       (20) On February 28, 2013, the United Nations Special 
     Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic 
     Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/22/56), which stated, 
     ``110 Bahai's are currently detained in Iran for exercising 
     their faith, including two women, Mrs. Zohreh Nikayin and 
     Mrs. Taraneh Torabi, who are reportedly nursing infants in 
     prison''.
       (21) In March and May of 2008, intelligence officials of 
     the Government of Iran in Mashhad and Tehran arrested and 
     imprisoned Mrs. Fariba Kamalabadi, Mr. Jamaloddin Khanjani, 
     Mr. Afif Naeimi, Mr. Saeid Rezaie, Mr. Behrouz Tavakkoli, 
     Mrs. Mahvash Sabet, and Mr. Vahid Tizfahm, the seven members 
     of the ad hoc leadership group for the Baha'i community in 
     Iran.
       (22) In August 2010, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran 
     sentenced the seven Baha'i leaders to 20-year prison terms on 
     charges of ``spying for Israel, insulting religious 
     sanctities, propaganda against the regime and spreading 
     corruption on earth''.
       (23) The lawyer for these seven leaders, Mrs. Shirin Ebadi, 
     the Nobel Laureate, was denied meaningful or timely access to 
     the prisoners and their files, and her successors as defense 
     counsel were provided extremely limited access.
       (24) These seven Baha'i leaders were targeted solely on the 
     basis of their religion.
       (25) Beginning in May 2011, Government of Iran officials in 
     four cities conducted sweeping raids on the homes of dozens 
     of individuals associated with the Baha'i Institute for 
     Higher Education (BIHE) and arrested and detained several 
     educators associated with BIHE.
       (26) In October 2011, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran 
     sentenced seven of these BIHE instructors and administrators, 
     Mr. Vahid Mahmoudi, Mr. Kamran Mortezaie, Mr. Mahmoud 
     Badavam, Ms. Nooshin Khadem, Mr. Farhad Sedghi, Mr. Riaz 
     Sobhani, and Mr. Ramin Zibaie, to prison terms for the crime 
     of ``membership of the deviant sect of Baha'ism, with the 
     goal of taking action against the security of the country, in 
     order to further the aims of the deviant sect and those of 
     organizations outside the country''.
       (27) Six of these educators remain imprisoned, with Mr. 
     Mortezaie serving a 5-year prison term and Mr. Badavam, Ms. 
     Khadem, Mr. Sedghi, Mr. Sobhani, and Mr. Zibaie serving 4-
     year prison terms.
       (28) Since October 2011, four other BIHE educators, Ms. 
     Faran Hessami, Mr. Kamran Rahimian, Mr. Kayvan Rahimian, and 
     Mr. Shahin Negari have been sentenced to 4-year prison terms, 
     which they are now serving.
       (29) The efforts of the Government of Iran to collect 
     information on individual Baha'is have recently intensified 
     as evidenced by a letter, dated November 5, 2011, from the 
     Director of the Department of Education in the county of 
     Shahriar in the province of Tehran, instructing the directors 
     of schools in his jurisdiction to ``subtly and in a 
     confidential manner'' collect information on Baha'i students.
       (30) The Baha'i community continues to undergo intense 
     economic and social pressure, including an ongoing campaign 
     in the town of Semnan, where the Government of Iran has 
     harassed and detained Baha'is, closed 17 Baha'i owned 
     businesses in the last three years, and imprisoned several 
     members of the community, including three mothers along with 
     their infants.
       (31) Ordinary Iranian citizens who belong to the Baha'i 
     faith are disproportionately targeted, interrogated, and 
     detained under the pretext of national security.
       (32) The Government of Iran is party to the International 
     Covenants on Human Rights and is in violation of its 
     obligations under the Covenants.
       (b) Statement of Policy.--Congress--
       (1) condemns the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored 
     persecution of its Baha'i minority and its continued 
     violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights;
       (2) calls on the Government of Iran to immediately release 
     the seven imprisoned leaders, the ten imprisoned educators, 
     and all other prisoners held solely on account of their 
     religion; and
       (3) calls on the President and Secretary of State, in 
     cooperation with responsible nations, to immediately condemn 
     the Government of Iran's continued violation of human rights 
     and demand the immediate release of prisoners held solely on 
     account of their religion.

[[Page 9110]]




         Amendment No. 128 Offered by Mr. Connolly of Virginia

       Page 522, line 8, insert before the semicolon the 
     following: ``, including those involved in Egyptian civil 
     society and democratic promotion efforts through 
     nongovernmental organizations''.


        Amendment No. 129 Offered by Ms. Ros-Lehtinen of Florida

       Page 522, after line 18, insert the following:
       (D) A description of the strategic objectives of the United 
     States regarding the provision of United States security 
     assistance to the Government of Egypt.
       (E) A description of biennial outlays of United States 
     security assistance to the Government of Egypt for the 
     purposes of strategic planning, training, provision of 
     equipment, and construction of facilities, including funding 
     streams.
       (F) A description of vetting and end-user monitoring 
     systems in place by both Egypt and the United States for 
     defense articles and training provided by the United States, 
     including human rights vetting.
       (G) A description of actions that the Government of Egypt 
     is taking to--
       (i) repudiate, combat, and stop incitement to violence 
     against the United States and United States citizens and 
     prohibit the transmission within its domains of satellite 
     television or radio channels that broadcast such incitement; 
     and
       (ii) adopt and implement legal reforms that protect the 
     religious and democratic freedoms of all citizens and 
     residents of Egypt.
       (H) Recommendations, including with respect to required 
     resources and actions, to maximize the effectiveness of 
     United States security assistance provided to Egypt.

       Page 523, after line 3, insert the following:

       (c) GAO Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     the submission of the report required under subsection (b), 
     the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to 
     the appropriate congressional committees a report that--
       (1) reviews and comments on the report required under 
     subsection (b); and
       (2) provides recommendations regarding additional actions 
     with respect to the provision of United States security 
     assistance to Egypt, if necessary.


          Amendment No. 132 Offered by Mr. Lamborn of Colorado

       Page 539, after line 7, insert the following new paragraph:

       (4) the sale or transfer of advanced anti-aircraft weapons 
     systems to Syria poses a grave risk to Israel and the United 
     States supports Israel's right to respond to this grave 
     threat as needed;

       Page 539, line 8, through page 540, line 12, redesignate 
     paragraphs (4) through (10) as paragraphs (5) through (11), 
     respectively.


         Amendment No. 133 Offered by Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT 
                   THE ARMS TRADE TREATY.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any 
     fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be 
     obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or 
     to make any change to existing programs, projects, or 
     activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, 
     pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, 
     unless the Arms Trade Treaty has been signed by the 
     President, received the advice and consent of the Senate, and 
     has been the subject of implementing legislation by the 
     Congress.


          Amendment No. 134 Offered by Mr. Rigell of Virginia

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. WAR POWERS OF CONGRESS.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) In 1793, George Washington said, ``The constitution 
     vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no 
     offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until 
     after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and 
     authorized such a measure.''.
       (2) In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1798, James Madison 
     wrote: ``The constitution supposes, what the History of all 
     Governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of 
     power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has 
     accordingly with studied care vested the question of war to 
     the Legislature.''
       (3) In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution 
     which states in section 2: ``The constitutional powers of the 
     President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States 
     Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where 
     imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by 
     the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a 
     declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or 
     (3) national emergency created by attack upon the United 
     States, its territories or possessions, or its armed 
     forces.''.
       (4) In its April 1, 2011, Memorandum to President Obama, 
     the Office of Legal Counsel concluded: ``President Obama 
     could rely on his constitutional power to safeguard the 
     national interest by directing the anticipated military 
     operations in Libya--which were limited in their nature, 
     scope, and duration--without prior congressional 
     authorization.''.
       (5) On June 15, 2011, in a letter to the Speaker of the 
     House of Representatives from the Department of Defense and 
     Department of State, the Departments informed Congress that 
     ``The President is of the view that the current U.S. military 
     operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers 
     Resolution and do not under that law require further 
     congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations 
     are distinct from the kind of `hostilities contemplated by 
     the Resolution's 60 day termination provision'.''.
       (6) The precedence set by the Executive Branch in its 
     assertion that Congress plays no role in military actions 
     like those taken in Libya is contrary to the intent of the 
     Framers and of the Constitution which vests sole authority to 
     declare war in the Legislative Branch.
       (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
     construed to authorize any use of military force.


           Amendment No. 136 Offered by Mr. Broun of Georgia

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DRONES TO KILL UNITED STATES 
                   CITIZENS.

       (a) Prohibition.--The Department of Defense may not use a 
     drone to kill a citizen of the United States.
       (b) Exception.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall 
     not apply to an individual who is actively engaged in combat 
     against the United States.
       (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``drone'' means 
     an unmanned aircraft (as defined in section 331 of the FAA 
     Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)).


         Amendment No. 138 Offered by Mr. Connolly of Virginia

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. SALE OF F-16 AIRCRAFT TO TAIWAN.

       The President shall carry out the sale of no fewer than 66 
     F-16C/D multirole fighter aircraft to Taiwan.


          Amendment No. 139 Offered by Mr. Roskam of Illinois

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. STATEMENT OF POLICY AND REPORT ON THE INHERENT 
                   RIGHT OF ISRAEL TO SELF-DEFENSE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
       (1) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation 
     Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) established the policy 
     of the United States to support the inherent right of Israel 
     to self-defense.
       (2) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation 
     Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) expressed the sense of 
     Congress that the Government of the United States should 
     transfer to the Government of Israel defense articles and 
     defense services such as air refueling tankers, missile 
     defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.
       (3) The inherent right of Israel to self-defense 
     necessarily includes the possession and maintenance by Israel 
     of an independent capability to remove existential threats to 
     its security and defend its vital national interests.
       (b) Policy of the United States.--It is the policy of the 
     United States to take all necessary steps to ensure that 
     Israel possesses and maintains an independent capability to 
     remove existential threats to its security and defend its 
     vital national interests.
       (c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     air refueling tankers and advanced bunker-buster munitions 
     should immediately be transferred to Israel to ensure our 
     democratic ally has an independent capability to remove any 
     existential threat posed by the Iranian nuclear program and 
     defend its vital national interests.
       (d) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the 
     President shall submit to the House and Senate Armed Services 
     committees, the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Senate 
     Foreign Relations Committee, and the House and Senate 
     Appropriations committees a report that--
       (1) identifies all aerial refueling platforms, bunker-
     buster munitions, and other capabilities and platforms that 
     would contribute significantly to the maintenance by Israel 
     of a robust independent capability to remove existential 
     security threats, including nuclear and ballistic missile 
     facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests;
       (2) assesses the availability for sale or transfer of items 
     necessary to acquire the capabilities and platforms described 
     in paragraph (1) as well as the legal authorities available 
     for making such transfers; and
       (3) describes the steps the President is taking to 
     immediately transfer the items described in paragraph (1) 
     pursuant to the policy described in subsection (b).


        Amendment No. 140 Offered by Mr. Bridenstine of Oklahoma

       Add at the end of subtitle E of title XII the following:

[[Page 9111]]



     SEC. 1259. REPORT ON COLLECTIVE AND NATIONAL SECURITY 
                   IMPLICATIONS OF CENTRAL ASIAN AND SOUTH 
                   CAUCASUS ENERGY DEVELOPMENT.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) Assured access to stable energy supplies is an enduring 
     concern of both the United States and the North Atlantic 
     Treaty Organization (NATO).
       (2) Adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, the new NATO 
     Strategic Concept declares that ``[s]ome NATO countries will 
     become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some 
     cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for 
     their energy needs''.
       (3) The report required by section 1233 of the National 
     Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 
     112-81) reaffirmed the Strategic Concept's assessment of 
     growing energy dependence of some members of the NATO 
     alliance and also noted there is value in the assured access, 
     protection, and delivery of energy.
       (4) Development of energy resources and transit routes in 
     the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea can diversify sources 
     of supply for members of the NATO alliance, particularly 
     those in Eastern Europe.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 
     Energy, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 
     detailed report on the implications of new energy resource 
     development and distribution networks, both planned and under 
     construction, in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea for 
     energy security strategies of the United States and NATO.
       (2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall 
     include the following:
       (A) An assessment of the dependence of NATO members on a 
     single oil or natural gas supplier or distribution network.
       (B) An assessment of the potential of energy resources of 
     the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea to mitigate such 
     dependence on a single supplier or distribution network.
       (C) Recommendations, if any, for ways in which the United 
     States can help support increased energy security for NATO 
     members.
       (3) Submission of classified information.--The report under 
     this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 
     may contain a classified annex.
       (c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
     means--
       (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
       (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate.


        Amendment No. 145 Offered by Mr. Bridenstine of Oklahoma

       Page 551, after line 12, insert the following:

     SEC. 1259. REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS 
                   INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

       (a) Report.--Not later than June 1, 2014, and June 1 of 
     each year thereafter through 2017, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall submit to the specified congressional committees a 
     report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the 
     current and future military power of the Russian Federation 
     (in this section referred to as ``Russia''). The report shall 
     address the current and probable future course of military-
     technological development of the Russian military, the tenets 
     and probable development of Russian security strategy and 
     military strategy, and military organizations and operational 
     concepts, for the 20-year period following submission of such 
     report.
       (b) Matters to Be Included.--A report required under 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) An assessment of the security situation in regions 
     neighboring Russia.
       (2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy 
     and military strategy.
       (3) Trends in Russian security and military behavior that 
     would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with, 
     the goals described in paragraph (2).
       (4) An assessment of Russia's global and regional security 
     objectives, including objectives that would affect the North 
     Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Middle East, and the 
     People's Republic of China.
       (5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and 
     capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land, 
     sea, and air forces.
       (6) Developments in Russian military doctrine and training.
       (7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia 
     and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, 
     technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or 
     other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
       (8) Developments in Russia's asymmetric capabilities, 
     including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy 
     cyberwarfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on 
     the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from 
     Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and 
     associated activities originating or suspected of originating 
     from Russia.
       (9) The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and 
     counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional 
     activities, the involvement of military and civilian 
     organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic 
     institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to 
     develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies 
     that would enhance Russian military capabilities.
       (10) Developments in Russia's nuclear program, including 
     the size and state of Russia's stockpile, its nuclear 
     strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military 
     production capacities, and projections of its future 
     arsenals.
       (11) A description of Russia's anti-access and area denial 
     capabilities.
       (12) A description of Russia's command, control, 
     communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and 
     reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for 
     Russia's precision guided weapons.
       (13) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the 
     Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-
     Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
       (14) The current state of United States military-to-
     military contacts with the Russian Federation Armed Forces, 
     which shall include the following:
       (A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such 
     military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy.
       (B) A summary of all such military-to-military contacts 
     during the one-year period preceding the report, including a 
     summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the 
     Russian participants in those contacts.
       (C) A description of such military-to-military contacts 
     scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and 
     the plan for future contacts.
       (D) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Russians 
     expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts.
       (E) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the 
     Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-
     military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts.
       (F) The Secretary's assessment of how such military-to-
     military contacts fit into the larger security relationship 
     between the United States and the Russian Federation.
       (15) A description of Russian military-to-military 
     relationships with other countries, including the size and 
     activity of military attache offices around the world and 
     military education programs conducted in Russia for other 
     countries or in other countries for the Russians.
       (16) Other military and security developments involving 
     Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to 
     United States national security.
       (c) Definition.--In this section the term ``specified 
     congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
       (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations of the Senate.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Larsen) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I urge the committee to adopt the amendments 
en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the majority and the 
minority.
  At this time, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and colleague, the 
gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Gingrey).
  Mr. GINGREY of Georgia. Madam Chairman, I thank the chairman for 
recognizing me, and I rise in strong support of the Connolly-Granger-
Diaz-Balart-Gingrey-Sires-Carter amendment No. 185 to H.R. 1960 that 
was included in the en bloc amendment No. 6.
  As a former cochair of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus, I believe 
this amendment embodies the spirit of the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 
in providing assistance to Taiwan for its own defense.
  Through the Taiwan Relations Act, we are able to conduct arms sales 
to Taipei. Over the past 30 years, we have done this time and time 
again. Unfortunately, the Obama administration has failed to proceed on 
Taiwan's top request: the F-16/CD aircraft.
  Taiwan has an aging fixed-wing aircraft fleet; and with the growing 
military gap across the Taiwan Strait, it is critical that we sell them 
this aircraft.
  Our bipartisan amendment does just that by requiring the President to 
move forward on the sale of no fewer than 66 F-16/CDs. And I urge my 
colleagues to uphold our commitment to Taiwan and support the Connolly-

[[Page 9112]]

Granger-Diaz-Balart-Gingrey-Sires-Carter amendment.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, at this time I yield 2 minutes to my friend 
and colleague, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Bridenstine).
  Mr. BRIDENSTINE. Madam Chair, I rise in support of my amendments, No. 
116 and No. 158, in the en bloc package.
  My first amendment requires the Department of Defense to annually 
assess military and security developments involving the Russian 
Federation.
  To be quite frank, the Obama administration's so-called ``reset 
policy'' with Russia is in shambles. Moscow has been intransigent on 
Iran, continues to supply Syria with weapons, occupies Georgia, has 
repeatedly threatened our NATO allies with nuclear strikes, and 
continually seeks to undermine the political independence of former 
Soviet satellite states.
  Vladimir Putin announced plans to spend about $750 billion to 
modernize the Russian military. The Putin build-up envisions modernized 
and robust nuclear, space and cyber forces. By the way, Madam Chairman, 
not too long ago Putin called the Soviet Union's collapse ``the 
greatest geopolitical catastrophe for the century.''

                              {time}  2030

  Russian military modernization concerns us and our allies and our 
friends, particularly those in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. It is 
imperative that Congress understand the implications of Russia's 
military buildup for our bilateral relationship and regional stability.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I continue to reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. How much time do we have left?
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 7 minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and 
colleague, the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Broun).
  Mr. BROUN of Georgia. I thank the chairman for yielding.
  I am pleased to support this en bloc amendment which includes 
important language to put a stop to the practice of using drones to 
kill Americans and prevent any administration in the future from doing 
so as well. The only exception would be if a citizen is actively 
engaged in combat against the United States. Not plotting, not 
suspected, but currently engaging in combat.
  Attorney General Eric Holder made it perfectly clear in a recent 
white paper that the administration believes that they have the right 
to be judge, jury and executioner of any and all American citizens.
  My amendment would correct this dangerous overreach and defend 
Americans' God-given constitutionally protected rights.
  However, while this will curtail the threat of drones, I'm 
disappointed that another of my amendments was not made in order to 
address another overarching issue.
  Along with my colleague from California, Congresswoman Lee, I 
sponsored an amendment to sunset the Authorization for Use of Military 
Force in Afghanistan, a provision that has outrageously expanded the 
powers of the Federal Government. This law has allowed our government 
to engage in indefinite detention, extrajudicial targeted killing, 
warrantless surveillance and wiretapping activities, and the open-ended 
expansion of military operations abroad.
  It's time for this provision to go. And if we need additional war 
authorizations, they should be narrow and clear, as our Founders 
intended. It's time to end this abuse of power by our Federal 
Government. I will continue working with my colleagues on both sides of 
the aisle to meet that goal and to restore liberty in America.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I continue to reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I yield 1 minute to my good friend from 
Georgia, Dr. Phil Gingrey.
  Mr. GINGREY of Georgia. Madam Chair, I rise today to urge my 
colleagues to support my commonsense amendment that was included in one 
of the en bloc amendments to be considered tomorrow that would express 
the sense of Congress that Active Duty military personnel who live in 
or are stationed in Washington, D.C., should be exempt from existing 
District of Columbia firearms restrictions.
  It is no secret that the District of Columbia has historically had 
some of the most restrictive firearm regulations in the Nation, even 
after the victory for Second Amendment rights in the 2008 ruling by the 
Supreme Court in the District of Columbia v. Heller. With approximately 
40,000 servicemen and -women across all branches of the Armed Forces 
either living in or actually stationed on Active Duty within the 
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, these individuals are subject to 
the very laws of the District of Columbia that make the lawful 
possession of firearms nearly impossible.
  My amendment would recognize that the D.C. handgun law, especially in 
regard to trained servicemen and -women, punishes individuals.
  The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentleman.
  Mr. GINGREY of Georgia. I thank the gentleman.
  Madam Chairman, my amendment would recognize that the D.C. handgun 
law, especially in regard to trained servicemen and -women, punishes 
individuals well-equipped to protect themselves and others while 
emboldening perpetrators of violent crime.
  I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this 
amendment.
  Mr. McKEON. We have no further speakers.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. McKEON. I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. FARR. Madam Chair, I rise today to express my appreciation for 
the House Armed Services Committee's acceptance of my amendment on the 
importance of foreign language and cultural education in the military. 
While the concept of military-to-military engagement is not new, it has 
an increasing level of importance in our contemporary operating 
environment. While most military training focuses on servicemembers 
being able to engage with the enemy, it is equally important to educate 
servicemembers on cultures and foreign language so that when we partner 
with foreign militaries and engage in capacity building, we can speak 
their language and understand their culture.
  The Chief of Staff of the Army, General Odierno, and the Supreme 
Allied Commander Europe, Admiral Stavridis, have argued that the future 
of our defense strategy requires strong relationships with capable 
partners. Unfortunately, there is a language and cultural capability 
gap in the Department of Defense, an organization that operates 
globally to accomplish its mission yet has less than 10% whom speak a 
second language. Effective partner capacity building requires the kind 
of relationships that cannot be built through using an interpreter 
alone.
  Our military's ability to understand cultures and languages in Iraq 
and Afghanistan has taken a long and costly road. That road's most 
valuable lesson is that our military personnel need the capacity to 
understand foreign cultures and languages before they are deployed. The 
ability of our junior and senior military leaders to build partnerships 
and partner capacity requires training in culture and languages not 
only in times of conflict but also in times of peace.
  Two world class military installations in my district provide this 
critically needed education to all the Services. The Defense Language 
Institute Foreign Language Center and the Naval Postgraduate School 
educate military personnel in the languages and cultures of our 
partners. Investment in language and culture enhances readiness for 
military intelligence, Special Forces, and general-purpose forces at a 
low cost. This capability enables servicemembers to connect with our 
partnering countries at the unit level where the mission is executed.
  America's strategic challenges, including a pivot to the Pacific 
region that has more than 70 countries and more than 100 regional and 
national languages, will generate additional requirements for language 
and put additional strain on the current capacity for skilled foreign 
language analysts, Foreign Area Officers, military intelligence 
personnel, and attaches.

[[Page 9113]]

We must meet the demand and respond proactively.
  Madam Chair, again, I am appreciative of the committee's support of 
foreign language capability and cultural understanding in the military 
and look forward to working with them in the future to ensure our 
military is resourced to meet the strategic demands of the future.
  Mr. CONNOLLY. Madam Chair, I am pleased to offer this simple 
bipartisan amendment with Reps. Wolf and Schneider to expand an 
existing report required by Section 1242 of the bill. The amendment 
clarifies that the report ought to include information on how the 
Egyptian military is supporting the rights of individuals involved in 
civil society and democratic promotion efforts through non-governmental 
organizations or NGOs.
  This a timely issue, given the guilty verdict rendered by an Egyptian 
court June 4th against 43 NGO workers--including 17 Americans--because 
of their involvement with pro-democracy groups. The guilty verdict 
renews concerns about Egypt's commitment to democratic principles. In 
fact, I am circulating a bipartisan letter with my Virginia colleague, 
Rep. Wolf, urging Egyptian President Morsi to immediately reconsider 
this action and permit the NGOs to continue their important work. So 
far, more than 50 Members of Congress have signed our bipartisan 
letter, including Rep. Schneider, who also cosponsored this amendment.
  The United States supports the aspirations of the Egyptian people to 
become a free and fair society, in which all NGOs--regardless of their 
nation of origin--are allowed to operate freely. I hope that Egyptian 
officials will come to this same realization and return property 
confiscated from the NGOs 18 months ago, remove their staff from the 
no-fly list, and permit them to continue their work supporting a fair 
and open election process and helping to improve the lives of all 
Egyptians.
  If the U.S. government and the American people are to have any 
confidence that the Egyptian government is undertaking a genuine 
transition to a democratic state, under civilian control, where the 
freedoms of assembly, association, religion, and expression are 
guaranteed and the rule of law is upheld, then we must see a swift and 
satisfactory resolution to this case.
  As my colleagues will recall, this ordeal began a year and a half 
ago, when Egyptian forces raided both American and non-American NGO 
offices. During the raids, Egyptian forces seized records, computers, 
other electronic equipment, and hard currency. At every turn Egyptian 
authorities assured the NGOs and U.S. authorities that the situation 
would be appropriately resolved, only to renege on their word. For 
example, three days after the raids, U.S. NGOs were waiting for the 
return of their confiscated property as promised by Field Marshal 
Tantawi while simultaneously, another Egyptian official--Fayza Abou 
Naga, the government minister in charge of coordinating foreign aid--
was holding a press conference saying the property would not be 
returned. Abou Naga also accused the NGOs of illicitly funneling money 
to the April 6th Youth Movement.
  When I traveled to Egypt in March of last year, my colleagues and I 
raised the issue of the NGOs with General Tantawi. During that trip, we 
also met with the Egyptian staffers who were facing charges. They were 
in a precarious position, and their situation has only worsened with 
the June 4th verdict.
  We cannot in good conscience ignore the results of the recent trial, 
which comes on the heels of a draft law that further restricts NGOs, 
fails to meet Egypt's international commitments with respect to freedom 
of association, and lends credence to the opinion that there is an 
ongoing war against civil society in Egypt.
  U.S. law with regard to this issue is clear in the restrictions 
placed on the $1.3 billion in military aid for Egypt:

       Prior to the obligation of funds appropriated by this Act 
     under the heading `Foreign Military Financing Program,' the 
     Secretary of State shall certify to the Committees on 
     Appropriations that the Government of Egypt is supporting the 
     transition to civilian government including holding free and 
     fair elections; implementing policies to protect freedom of 
     expression, association, and religion, and due process of 
     law.

  With the current state of affairs in Egypt, any such certification 
that Egypt is, in fact, implementing policies to guarantee the pillars 
of a free society would be met with skepticism. That is why news 
reports of Sec. Kerry's recent action to waive the restrictions on that 
military aid are of particular concern. It is not too late to include 
these important NGO issues in a larger discussion about releasing (or 
withholding) other tranches of money to Egypt.
  Our amendment would further support the transition to democracy by 
requiring the Pentagon report on how Egyptian military activities 
contribute to an atmosphere where pro-democracy NGOs can operate 
freely. I encourage my colleagues to support the Connolly/Wolf/
Schneider amendment and to sign the related letter to President Morsi 
of Egypt.
  Mr. CONNOLLY. Madam Chair, I am pleased to offer this bipartisan 
amendment on behalf of my fellow co-chairs of the Congressional Taiwan 
Caucus: Reps. Diaz-Balart, Carter, and Sires. We also have two other 
notable cosponsors: Rep. Gingrey, the former co-chair of the Caucus, 
and Rep. Granger. Our amendment would affirm the United States' 
longstanding economic and defensive partnership with Taiwan, which 
dates back to the 1940s.
  This amendment reflects the same language adopted by voice vote in 
the House during consideration of the FY13 National Defense 
Authorization Act. In the 112th Congress, 181 Members of the House of 
Representatives sent a letter to the Administration citing the 
``critical'' need for the United States ``to sell the government of 
Taiwan all the F-16 C/D [aircraft] it requires.'' The letter urged the 
Administration to ``move quickly'' on this matter and cited the Taiwan 
Relations Act of 1979 (TRA) as the statutory basis for such a sale.
  The Administration's announcement to sell only a retrofit package for 
Taiwan's older fighter jets disappointed Taiwan's supporters. After 
all, U.S. policy with regard to the defensive capabilities of Taiwan is 
clearly outlined in the TRA, which states it is the policy of the U.S. 
``to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character.''
  Moreover, three joint communiques between the U.S. and the People's 
Republic of China (PRC), and the ``Six Assurances'' to Taipei offered 
by President Reagan, add additional context to the U.S.-Taiwan 
relationship. The defensive weapons provision in the TRA has been an 
irritant in the relationship with Beijing, but this provision is 
necessary for Taiwan's defense.
  It should be no surprise that advocates for Taipei's defensive needs 
continue to push for the sale of the 66 F-16 C/D planes. It is 
important that U.S. obligations to provide for Taiwan's defenses--
codified in and by the TRA--be dictated by our assessments of Taiwan's 
needs and not by the threat, implied or otherwise, of Taiwan's big 
neighbor. Beyond this defense relationship, the United States has 
strong economic ties with Taiwan. In 2010 total U.S. trade with Taiwan 
was $61.9 billion, making it the 9th largest U.S. trading partner.
  I encourage my colleagues to vote for this bipartisan amendment 
directing the President to sell 66 F-16 C/D aircraft to Taiwan.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.


             Amendments En Bloc No. 7 Offered by Mr. McKeon

  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, pursuant to H. Res. 260, I offer amendments 
en bloc.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc.
  Amendments en bloc No. 7 consisting of amendment Nos. 76, 92, 93, 
122, 124, 125, 131, 135, 141, 144, 147, 148, 151, 155, 162, 167, 168, 
and 169, printed in House Report No. 113-108, offered by Mr. McKeon of 
California:


         Amendment No. 76 Offered by Ms. Schakowsky of Illinois

       At the end of subtitle D of title VI, add the following new 
     section:

     SEC. 6__. EXCHANGE STORE SYSTEM PARTICIPATION IN THE ACCORD 
                   ON FIRE AND BUILDING SAFETY IN BANGLADESH.

       (a) Special Procurement Guidance for Garments Manufactured 
     in Bangladesh.--The senior official of the Department of 
     Defense designated pursuant to section 2481(c) to oversee the 
     defense commissary system and the exchange store system shall 
     require, consistent with applicable international agreements, 
     that the exchange store system--
       (1) for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh 
     for the private label brands of the exchange store system, 
     becomes a signatory of or otherwise complies with applicable 
     requirements set forth in the Accord on Fire and Building 
     Safety in Bangladesh;
       (2) for the purchase of licensed apparel manufactured in 
     Bangladesh, gives a preference to licensees that are 
     signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in 
     Bangladesh; and
       (3) for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh 
     from retail suppliers, gives a preference to retail suppliers 
     that are signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building 
     Safety in Bangladesh.

[[Page 9114]]

       (b) Notice of Exceptions.--If any garments manufactured in 
     Bangladesh are purchased from suppliers that are not 
     signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in 
     Bangladesh, the Department of Defense official referred to in 
     subsection (a) shall notify Congress of the purchase and the 
     reasons therefor.
       (c) Effective Date.--The requirements imposed by this 
     section shall take effect 90 days after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act or as soon after that date as the 
     Secretary of Defense determines to be practicable so as to 
     avoid disruption in garment supplies for the exchange store 
     system.


           Amendment No. 92 Offered by Mr. Rigell of Virginia

       At the end of title VIII, add the following new section:

     SEC. 833. PROHIBITION ON PURCHASE OF MILITARY COINS NOT MADE 
                   IN UNITED STATES.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     may be used to purchase military coins that are not produced 
     in the United States.


        Amendment No. 93 Offered by Ms. Tsongas of Massachusetts

       At the end of title VIII, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 833. COMPLIANCE WITH DOMESTIC SOURCE REQUIREMENTS FOR 
                   FOOTWEAR FURNISHED TO ENLISTED MEMBERS OF THE 
                   ARMED FORCES UPON THEIR INITIAL ENTRY INTO THE 
                   ARMED FORCES.

       (a) Requirement.--Section 418 of title 37, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
     subsection:
       ``(d)(1) In the case of athletic footwear needed by members 
     of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their 
     initial entry into the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense 
     shall furnish such footwear directly to the members instead 
     of providing a cash allowance to the members for the purchase 
     of such footwear.
       ``(2) In procuring athletic footwear to comply with 
     paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall comply with the 
     requirements of section 2533a of title 10, without regard to 
     the applicability of any simplified acquisition threshold 
     under chapter 137 of title 10 (or any other provision of 
     law).--
       ``(3) This subsection does not prohibit the provision of a 
     cash allowance to a member described in paragraph (1) for the 
     purchase of athletic footwear if such footwear--
       ``(A) is medically required to meet unique physiological 
     needs of the member; and
       ``(B) cannot be met with athletic footwear that complies 
     with the requirements of this subsection.''.
       (b) Certification.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
     shall not take effect until the Secretary of Defense 
     certifies that there are at least two sources that can 
     provide athletic footwear to the Department of Defense that 
     is 100 percent compliant with section 2533a of title 10, 
     United States Code.


        Amendment No. 122 Offered by Mr. Lynch of Massachusetts

       Page 497, line 13, strike ``(g), (h), and (i)'' and insert 
     ``(h), (i), and (j)''.
       Page 497, line 15, strike ``subsection'' and insert 
     ``subsections''.
       Page 498, line 11, before the closing quotation marks 
     insert the following:
       ``(g) Matters to Be Included: Assessment of Capability of 
     ANSF to Provide Operations and Maintenance Functions.--The 
     report required under subsection (a) shall include a detailed 
     assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security 
     Forces (ANSF) to provide operations and maintenance functions 
     for infrastructure projects constructed for the ANSF after 
     January 1, 2015, including--
       ``(1) a description of training provided to the ANSF by the 
     United States and the International Security Assistance 
     Force;
       ``(2) a comprehensive evaluation of operations and 
     maintenance capabilities and skills; and
       ``(3) the Government of Afghanistan's financial wherewithal 
     to perform or contract out such functions.


          Amendment No. 124 Offered by Mr. Johnson of Georgia

       At the end of subtitle C of title XII, add the following 
     new section:

     SEC. 12_. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO ESTABLISH PERMANENT MILITARY 
                   INSTALLATIONS OR BASES IN AFGHANISTAN.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     may be obligated or expended by the United States Government 
     to establish any military installation or base for the 
     purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United 
     States Armed Forces in Afghanistan.


         Amendment No. 125 Offered by Mr. Schneider of Illinois

       Page 509, line 7, strike ``and'' at the end.
       Page 509, line 11, strike the first period, the closing 
     quotation marks, and the second period and insert ``; and''.
       Page 509, after line 11, add the following new 
     subparagraph:
       ``(G) an analysis of how sanctions on Iran are effecting 
     its military capability and its ability to export terrorism 
     to proxy groups within its Threat Network.''.


         Amendment No. 131 Offered by Mr. Schneider of Illinois

       Page 539, strike lines 4 through 7 and insert the 
     following:
       (3) the conflict in Syria threatens the vital national 
     security interests of Israel and the stability of Jordan, 
     Lebanon, and Turkey, the implications of which should be 
     sufficiently weighed by the President when considering policy 
     approaches towards the conflict in Syria;
       Page 540, line 11, strike ``and'' at the end.
       Page 540, line 14, strike the period at the end and insert 
     ``; and''.
       Page 540, after line 14, insert the following new 
     paragraph:
       (11) the President should use all diplomatic means to 
     disrupt the flow of arms into Syria, including efforts to 
     dissuade Russia from further arms sales with Syria, the 
     influx of weapons and fighters from Hezbollah, and the 
     infiltration of weapons and fighters from Iran.


         Amendment No. 135 Offered by Mr. Ellison of Minnesota

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A of the 
     bill, add the following:

     SEC. 12XX. LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE TO PROVIDE TEAR GAS OR 
                   OTHER RIOT CONTROL ITEMS.

       None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
     may be used to provide tear gas or other riot control items 
     to the government of a country undergoing a transition to 
     democracy in the Middle East or North Africa unless the 
     Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committee on Armed 
     Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of 
     the House of Representatives that the security forces of such 
     government are not using excessive force to repress peaceful, 
     lawful, and organized dissent.


           Amendment No. 141 Offered by Mr. Welch of Vermont

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII, add the following:

     SEC. 1259. REPORT ON CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO AFGHAN 
                   MILITARY.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a 
     report on measures to monitor and ensure that United States 
     financial assistance to the Afghan National Security Forces 
     to purchase fuel is not used to purchase fuel from Iran in 
     violation of United States sanctions.


           Amendment No. 144 Offered by Mr. Gosar of Arizona

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A, add 
     the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. ISRAEL'S RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE.

       Congress fully supports Israel's lawful exercise of self-
     defense, including actions to halt regional aggression.


          Amendment No. 147 Offered by Mr. Walorski of Indiana

       At the appropriate place in title XII insert the following 
     new section:

     SEC. 12_. SENSE OF CONGRESS STRONGLY SUPPORTING THE FULL 
                   IMPLEMENTATION OF UNITED STATES AND 
                   INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS ON IRAN AND URGING THE 
                   PRESIDENT TO CONTINUE TO STRENGTHEN ENFORCEMENT 
                   OF SANCTIONS LEGISLATION.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) On May 14, 1948, the people of Israel proclaimed the 
     establishment of the sovereign and independent State of 
     Israel.
       (2) On March 28, 1949, the United States Government 
     recognized the establishment of the new State of Israel and 
     established full diplomatic relations.
       (3) Since its establishment nearly 65 years ago, the modern 
     State of Israel has rebuilt a nation, forged a new and 
     dynamic democratic society, and created a thriving economic, 
     political, cultural, and intellectual life despite the heavy 
     costs of war, terrorism, and unjustified diplomatic and 
     economic boycotts against the people of Israel.
       (4) The people of Israel have established a vibrant, 
     pluralistic, democratic political system, including freedom 
     of speech, association, and religion; a vigorously free 
     press; free, fair, and open elections; the rule of law; a 
     fully independent judiciary; and other democratic principles 
     and practices.
       (5) Since the 1979 revolution in Iran, the leaders of the 
     Islamic Republic of Iran have repeatedly made threats against 
     the existence of the State of Israel and sponsored acts of 
     terrorism and violence against its citizens.
       (6) On October 27, 2005, President of Iran Mahmoud 
     Ahmadinejad called for a world without America and Zionism.
       (7) In February 2012, Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei 
     said of Israel, ``The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor 
     on this region that should be cut off. And it definitely will 
     be cut off.''.
       (8) In August 2012, Supreme Leader Khamenei said of Israel, 
     ``This bogus and fake Zionist outgrowth will disappear off 
     the landscape of geography.''.
       (9) In August 2012, President Ahmadinejad said that ``in 
     the new Middle East . . . there will be no trace of the 
     American presence and the Zionists'';
       (10) The Department of State has designated the Islamic 
     Republic of Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 
     and has

[[Page 9115]]

     characterized the Islamic Republic of Iran as the ``most 
     active state sponsor of terrorism'' in the world.
       (11) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has 
     provided weapons, training, funding, and direction to 
     terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hizballah, and Shiite 
     militias in Iraq that are responsible for the murder of 
     hundreds of United States service members and innocent 
     civilians.
       (12) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has 
     provided weapons, training, and funding to the regime of 
     Bashar al Assad that has been used to suppress and murder its 
     own people.
       (13) Since at least the late 1980s, the Government of the 
     Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged in a sustained and well-
     documented pattern of illicit and deceptive activities to 
     acquire a nuclear weapons capability.
       (14) Since September 2005, the Board of Governors of the 
     International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found the 
     Islamic Republic of Iran to be in non-compliance with its 
     safeguards agreement with the IAEA, which Iran is obligated 
     to undertake as a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the 
     Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at 
     Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into 
     force March 5, 1970 (NPT).
       (15) The United Nations Security Council has adopted 
     multiple resolutions since 2006 demanding of the Government 
     of the Islamic Republic of Iran its full and sustained 
     suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing 
     activities and its full cooperation with the IAEA on all 
     outstanding issues related to its nuclear activities, 
     particularly those concerning the possible military 
     dimensions of its nuclear program.
       (16) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has 
     refused to comply with United Nations Security Council 
     resolutions or to fully cooperate with the IAEA.
       (17) In November 2011, the IAEA Director General issued a 
     report that documented ``serious concerns regarding possible 
     military dimensions to Iran's nuclear programme'', and 
     affirmed that information available to the IAEA indicates 
     that ``Iran has carried out activities relevant to the 
     development of a nuclear explosive device'' and that some 
     activities may be ongoing.
       (18) The Government of Iran stands in violation of the 
     Universal Declaration of Human Rights for denying its 
     citizens basic freedoms, including the freedoms of 
     expression, religion, peaceful assembly and movement, and for 
     flagrantly abusing the rights of minorities and women.
       (19) In his State of the Union Address on January 24, 2012, 
     President Barack Obama stated, ``Let there be no doubt: 
     America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear 
     weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve 
     that goal.''.
       (20) Congress has passed and the President has signed into 
     law legislation imposing significant economic and diplomatic 
     sanctions on Iran to encourage the Government of Iran to 
     abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and end its support 
     for terrorism.
       (21) These sanctions, while having significant effect, have 
     yet to persuade Iran to abandon its illicit pursuits and 
     comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions.
       (22) More stringent enforcement of sanctions legislation, 
     including elements targeting oil exports and access to 
     foreign exchange, could still lead the Government of Iran to 
     change course.
       (23) In his State of the Union Address on February 12, 
     2013, President Obama reiterated, ``The leaders of Iran must 
     recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution, 
     because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet 
     their obligations. And we will do what is necessary to 
     prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon.''.
       (24) On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, ``Iran's 
     leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of 
     containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a 
     nuclear weapon.''.
       (25) On October 22, 2012, President Obama said of Iran, 
     ``The clock is ticking . . . And we're going to make sure 
     that if they do not meet the demands of the international 
     community, then we are going to take all options necessary to 
     make sure they don't have a nuclear weapon.''.
       (26) On May 19, 2011, President Obama stated, ``Every state 
     has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to 
     defend itself, by itself, against any threat.''.
       (27) On September 21, 2011, President Obama stated, 
     ``America's commitment to Israel's security is unshakeable. 
     Our friendship with Israel is deep and enduring.''.
       (28) On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, ``And 
     whenever an effort is made to delegitimize the state of 
     Israel, my administration has opposed them. So there should 
     not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I 
     have Israel's back.''.
       (29) On October 22, 2012, President Obama stated, ``Israel 
     is a true friend. And if Israel is attacked, America will 
     stand with Israel. I've made that clear throughout my 
     presidency . . . I will stand with Israel if they are 
     attacked.''.
       (30) In December 2012, 74 United States Senators wrote to 
     President Obama ``As you begin your second term as President, 
     we ask you to reiterate your readiness to take military 
     action against Iran if it continues its efforts to acquire a 
     nuclear weapon. In addition, we urge you to work with our 
     European and Middle Eastern allies to demonstrate to the 
     Iranians that a credible and capable multilateral coalition 
     exists that would support a military strike if, in the end, 
     this is unfortunately necessary.''.
       (31) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation 
     Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-150) stated that it is United 
     States policy to support Israel's inherent right to self-
     defense.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
       (1) reaffirms the special bonds of friendship and 
     cooperation that have existed between the United States and 
     the State of Israel for more than sixty years and that enjoy 
     overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress and among the 
     people of the United States;
       (2) strongly supports the close military, intelligence, and 
     security cooperation that President Obama has pursued with 
     Israel and urges this cooperation to continue and deepen;
       (3) deplores and condemns, in the strongest possible terms, 
     the reprehensible statements and policies of the leaders of 
     the Islamic Republic of Iran threatening the security and 
     existence of Israel;
       (4) recognizes the tremendous threat posed to the United 
     States, the West, and Israel by the Government of Iran's 
     continuing pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability;
       (5) reiterates that the policy of the United States is to 
     prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon capability and 
     to take such action as may be necessary to implement this 
     policy;
       (6) reaffirms its strong support for the full 
     implementation of United States and international sanctions 
     on Iran and urges the President to continue and strengthen 
     enforcement of sanctions legislation;
       (7) declares that the United States has a vital national 
     interest in, and unbreakable commitment to, ensuring the 
     existence, survival, and security of the State of Israel, and 
     reaffirms United States support for Israel's right to self-
     defense; and
       (8) urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to 
     take military action in legitimate self-defense against 
     Iran's nuclear weapons program, the United States Government 
     should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with 
     United States law and the constitutional responsibility of 
     Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, 
     military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in 
     its defense of its territory, people, and existence.
       (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed as an authorization for the use of force or a 
     declaration of war.


        Amendment No. 148 Offered by Mr. Fortenberry of Nebraska

       At the end of title XIII, add the following new section:

     SEC. 13_. STRATEGY TO MODERNIZE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 
                   AND PREVENT THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF 
                   MASS DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS IN THE 
                   MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA REGION.

       (a) Strategy Required.--The Secretary of Defense, in 
     consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 
     Energy, shall establish a comprehensive and broad 
     nonproliferation strategy to modernize cooperative threat 
     reduction and advance cooperative efforts with international 
     partners to reduce the threat from the proliferation of 
     weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the 
     Middle East and North Africa region.
       (b) Elements.--The strategy required by subsection (a) 
     shall--
       (1) build upon the current activities of the Departments of 
     Defense, State, and Energy's nonproliferation programs that 
     aim to mitigate the range of threats in the Middle East and 
     North Africa region posed by weapons of mass destruction;
       (2) review issues relating to the threat from the 
     proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related 
     materials in the Middle East and North Africa region on a 
     regional basis as well as on a country-by-country basis;
       (3) review the activities and achievements in the Middle 
     East and North Africa region of the Department of Defense 
     Cooperative Threat Reduction Program and the nonproliferation 
     programs at the Department of State and Department of Energy 
     and other United States Government agencies and departments 
     designed to address nuclear, radiological, chemical, and 
     biological safety and security issues;
       (4) ensure the continued coordination of cooperative 
     nonproliferation efforts within the United States Government 
     and further mobilize and leverage additional resources from 
     partner nations, nongovernmental and multilateral 
     organizations, and international institutions;
       (5) include an assessment of what countries are 
     financially, materially, or technologically supporting 
     proliferation in this region and how the strategy will 
     prevent, stop or interdict the support;
       (6) include an estimate of associated costs required to 
     plan and execute the proposed cooperative threat reduction 
     activities in order

[[Page 9116]]

     to execute the comprehensive strategy to prevent the 
     proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related 
     materials; and
       (7) include a discussion of the metrics to measure the 
     strategy's and activities' success in reducing the regional 
     threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
       (c) Integration and Coordination.--The strategy required by 
     subsection (a) shall include an assessment of gaps in current 
     cooperative nonproliferation efforts, an articulation of 
     agencies' threat reduction priorities in the Middle East and 
     North Africa region, the establishment of appropriate metrics 
     for determining success in the region, and steps to ensure 
     that the strategy fits in broader United States efforts to 
     reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction.
       (d) Consultation.--In establishing the strategy required by 
     subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may consult with 
     both governmental and nongovernmental experts from a diverse 
     set of views.
       (e) Strategy and Implementation Plan.--Not later than March 
     31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
     specified congressional committees the cooperative threat 
     reduction modernization strategy required by subsection (a), 
     as well as a plan for the implementation of the strategy 
     required by subsection (a).
       (f) Form.--The strategy required by subsection (a) shall be 
     submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 
     annex.
       (g) Specified Congressional Committees.--In this section, 
     the term ``specific congressional committees'' means--
       (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
     House of Representatives; and
       (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
     Senate.


          Amendment No. 151 Offered by Mr. Schrader of Oregon

       At the end of title XVI, insert the following new section:

     SEC. 1607. PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FEDERAL CONTRACTS TO EARLY 
                   STAGE SMALL BUSINESSES.

       (a) In General.--The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et 
     seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

     ``SEC. 48. PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FEDERAL CONTRACTS TO EARLY 
                   STAGE SMALL BUSINESSES.

       ``(a) Establishment.--The Administrator shall establish and 
     carry out a program in accordance with the requirements of 
     this section to provide improved access to Federal contract 
     opportunities for early stage small business concerns.
       ``(b) Procurement Contracts.--
       ``(1) In general.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
     Administrator, in consultation with other Federal agencies, 
     shall identify procurement contracts of Federal agencies for 
     award under the program.
       ``(2) Contract awards.--Under the program established 
     pursuant to this section, the award of a procurement contract 
     of a Federal agency identified by the Administrator pursuant 
     to paragraph (1) shall be made by the agency to an eligible 
     program participant selected, and determined to be 
     responsible, by the agency.
       ``(3) Competition.--
       ``(A) Sole source.--A contracting officer may award a sole 
     source contract under this program if such concern is 
     determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to 
     performance of such contract opportunity and the contracting 
     officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more 
     early stage small business concerns will submit offers for 
     the contracting opportunity and in the estimation of the 
     contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair 
     and reasonable price.
       ``(B) Restricted competition.--A contracting officer may 
     award contracts on the basis of competition restricted to 
     early stage small business concerns if the contracting 
     officer has a reasonable expectation that not less than 2 
     early stage small business concerns will submit offers and 
     that the award can be made at a fair market price.
       ``(4) Contract value.--Contracts shall be awarded under 
     this program if its value is greater than $3,000 and less 
     than half the upper threshold of section 15(j)(1) of the 
     Small Business Act.
       ``(c) Eligibility.--Only an early stage small business 
     concern shall be eligible to compete for a contract to be 
     awarded under the program. The Administrator shall certify 
     that a small business concern is an early stage small 
     business concern, or the Administrator shall approve a 
     Federal agency, a State government, or a national certifying 
     entity to certify that the business meets the eligibility 
     criteria of an early stage small business concern.
       ``(d) Technical Assistance.--The Administrator shall 
     provide early stage small business concerns with technical 
     assistance and counseling with regard to--
       ``(1) applying for and competing for Federal contracts; and
       ``(2) fulfilling the administrative responsibilities 
     associated with the performance of a Federal contract.
       ``(e) Attainment of Contract Goals.--All contract awards 
     made under the program shall be counted toward the attainment 
     of the goals specified in section 15(g) of the Small Business 
     Act.
       ``(f) Regulations.--The Administrator shall--
       ``(1) issue proposed regulations to carry out this section 
     not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
     Act; and
       ``(2) issue final regulations to carry out this section not 
     later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
       ``(g) Report to Congress.--Not later than April 30, 2015, 
     the Administrator shall transmit to the Congress a report on 
     the performance of the program.
       ``(h) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the 
     following definitions shall apply:
       ``(1) Program.--The term `program' means a program 
     established pursuant to subsection (a).
       ``(2) Early stage small business concern.--The term `early 
     stage small business concern' means a small business concern 
     that--
       ``(A) has not more than 15 employees; and
       ``(B) has average annual receipts that total not more than 
     $1,000,000, except if the concern is in an industry with an 
     average annual revenue standard that is less than $1,000,000, 
     as defined by the North American Industry Classification 
     System.''.
       (b) Repeal of Similar Program.--Section 304 of the Small 
     Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 
     1994 (15 U.S.C. 644 note) is repealed.


           Amendment No. 155 Offered by Mr. Garcia of Florida

       Page 617, after line 7, insert the following:

     SEC. 2807A. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT ON MILITARY HOUSING 
                   PRIVATIZATION INITIATIVE.

       Not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary of Defense shall issue a report to Congress on the 
     Military Housing Privatization Initiative under subchapter IV 
     of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code. The report 
     shall include the details of any project where the project 
     owner has outstanding local, county, city, town or State tax 
     obligations dating back over 12 months, as determined by a 
     final judgment by a tax authority.


         Amendment No. 162 Offered by Mr. Pearce of New Mexico

       Page 723, after line 23, insert the following:

     SEC. 3145. GOVERNMENT WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT EXTENSION.

       (a) Extension of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Mission.--The 
     Secretary of Energy shall manage WIPP in such a way as to 
     include, in addition to the disposal of wastes authorized by 
     section 213 of the Department of Energy National Security and 
     Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 
     1980 (Public Law 96-164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265), the 
     transportation and disposal of any non-defense Federal 
     Government-owned transuranic waste that can be shown to meet 
     the applicable criteria described in the document entitled 
     ``Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria For The Waste 
     Isolation Pilot Plant'', published by the Department of 
     Energy on April 21, 2011, or any successor document.
       (b) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Disposal; transuranic waste.--The terms ``disposal'' 
     and ``transuranic waste'' have the meanings given those terms 
     in section 2 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land 
     Withdrawal Act (Public Law 102-579; 106 Stat. 4777).
       (2) WIPP.--The term ``WIPP'' means the Waste Isolation 
     Pilot Plant project authorized under section 213 of the 
     Department of Energy National Security and Military 
     Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 
     (Public Law 96-164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265).


         Amendment No. 167 Offered by Mr. Whitfield of Kentucky

       Add at the end of subtitle C of title X the following:

     SEC. 1090. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADVISORY 
                   BOARD ON TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND WORKER HEALTH.

       It is the sense of Congress that the President should 
     establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker 
     Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General 
     of the United States titled ``Energy Employees Compensation: 
     Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would 
     Improve Program's Credibility'', numbered GAO-10-302, to--
       (1) advise the President concerning the review and approval 
     of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix;
       (2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical 
     guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the 
     weighing of a claimant's medical evidence;
       (3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary 
     requirements for part B claims related to lung disease 
     regardless of approval;
       (4) provide oversight over industrial hygienists, 
     Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of 
     Labor's consulting physicians and their reports to ensure 
     quality, objectivity, and consistency; and
       (5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the 
     Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to the extent 
     necessary (under section 3624 the Energy Employees 
     Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 
     U.S.C. 7384o).

[[Page 9117]]




           Amendment No. 168 Offered by Mr. Franks of Arizona

       At the end of subtitle E of title XII of division A of the 
     bill, add the following new section:

     SEC. 12_. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE ILLEGAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
                   PROGRAMS OF IRAN AND NORTH KOREA.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the paramount security concern of the United States is 
     the ongoing and illegal nuclear weapons programs of the 
     Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic People's Republic 
     of Korea;
       (2) it should be the primary objective of the President of 
     the United States to ensure that North Korea's nuclear 
     program is completely and verifiably eliminated and that 
     Iran, and its terrorist proxies, are not allowed to develop 
     nuclear weapons capability and the means to deliver them;
       (3) the continuing failure to compel Iran and North Korea 
     to comply with their respective obligations under 
     international law risks greater nuclear proliferation 
     throughout already unstable regions by states that have 
     chosen, but not irreversibly so, to refrain from developing 
     or acquiring their own nuclear weapons capability;
       (4) nuclear arms reductions by the United States and the 
     Russian Federation have not persuaded or otherwise 
     incentivized Iran and North Korea to halt or reverse their 
     destabilizing and dangerous nuclear weapons programs, nor 
     have they resulted in increased cooperation by other states 
     to deal with these threats; and
       (5) the President should use all international fora 
     available to the President to pursue the complete and 
     verifiable elimination of the nuclear weapons programs of 
     Iran and North Korea as the President's paramount obligation 
     to the security of the American people.


           Amendment No. 169 Offered by Mr. Franks of Arizona

       Page 456, line 12, strike ``Secretary of the Defense'' and 
     insert ``Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy 
     Regulatory Commission,''.
       Page 456, line 15, after ```TCAs')'' insert the following: 
     ``that receive power supply from commercial or other non-
     military sources''.
       Page 456, line 21, strike ``Secretary of the Defense'' and 
     insert ``Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy 
     Regulatory Commission,''.
       Page 457, lines 3 through 4, after ``Department of 
     Defense'' insert the following: ``, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy 
     Regulatory Commission,''.
       Page 457, line 8, after ``Department'' insert the 
     following: ``, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland 
     Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,''.
       Page 457, line 12, after ``Department'' insert the 
     following: ``, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland 
     Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,''.
       Page 457, line 18, after ``Secretary of Defense'' insert 
     the following: ``, in consultation with the Secretary of 
     Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory 
     Commission,''.

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 260, the gentleman 
from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Larsen) each will control 10 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I urge the committee to adopt the amendments 
en bloc, all of which have been examined by both the majority and the 
minority. We have no speakers on these amendments.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Chair, we have no speakers, and I 
yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. MICHAUD. Madam Chair, I rise today to support the Tsongas-Michaud 
amendment, which will strengthen the Department of Defenses' (DOD) Buy 
America requirements.
  According to the Berry Amendment, the Department of Defense (DOD) 
cannot procure clothing items unless they are produced in the United 
States. In recent years, however, DOD has circumvented this policy by 
issuing cash allowances to soldiers for their own purchase of physical 
training shoes.
  The amendment that Representative Tsongas and I sponsored to the 
Defense Authorization bill would require that any footwear furnished or 
provided by cash allowance to members of the Armed Forces upon initial 
entry be Berry compliant. Two major, domestic athletic footwear 
brands--New Balance and Wolverine World Wide--are already prepared to 
produce 100% Berry compliant athletic shoes for the U.S. military. And 
at least one of those companies can do so at a lower price than the 
value of the cash allowances DOD gives soldiers now.
  If DOD started complying with the Berry Amendment, I feel confident 
many more companies would jump into the market as well. This would be 
good for our troops and good for our economy. This amendment makes 
Congress' intent of the Berry Amendment explicit and will ensure that 
all components of our troops' PT uniforms are made in the U.S.A.
  Madam Chair, this amendment will guarantee our troops fight and train 
in American-made uniforms from head to toe.
  Ms. SCHAKOWSKY. Madam Chair, I rise in support of the Schakowsky/
Miller amendment, included in this en bloc. I want to thank the 
Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Armed Services Committee for 
including this amendment.
  Last November, the world was shocked by a horrific fire at 
Bangladesh's Tazreen Fashions garment factory. 112 workers were killed 
in the blaze; survivors recounted terrifying conditions, including 
locked exits and workers forced to jump from 4th story windows.
  The Tazreen fire is far from an isolated incident. Many of 
Bangladesh's 4 million garment workers--most of whom are women--risk 
their lives every day they go to work in extremely unsafe factories. 
While governments and corporations alike have spoken of their 
dedication to improving conditions and protecting workers rights, the 
fact remains that many Bangladeshi garment factories are literally 
death traps.
  In the rubble of the Tazreen fire, activists found evidence 
suggesting that, among other apparel, the factory produced products 
with Marine insignias. Photographs taken in the ashes of Tazreen show 
patterns and orders for sweatshirts and pants with the Marine Corps 
logo, the motto ``Semper Fi,'' and even the tagline ``The Few. The 
Proud.''
  According to public data, the Army-Air Force Exchange imported some 
124,000 pounds of garments last year from factories in Bangladesh.
  Madam Chair, apparel made for our brave men and women in uniform 
should not be made in needlessly dangerous factories. Workers making 
clothing for our military exchanges shouldn't face daily threats of 
deadly fire, building collapse, and other preventable tragedies. They 
shouldn't be fired for refusing to work in unsafe conditions, nor 
should they be denied basic, internationally-recognized worker rights.
  The Schakowsky/Miller would require that garments made in Bangladesh 
and sold at DoD base retail stores and exchanges comply with an 
enforceable fire and building safety accord. Specifically, the 
amendment would help the United States government save lives in 
Bangladesh by requiring that military exchanges which sell their own 
branded garments made in Bangladesh must join or abide by the 
conditions of the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. It 
also states that military exchanges that license production of their 
own brands or sell at retail other branded garments shall provide a 
preference to vendors which are signatories to the Accord on Fire and 
Building Safety in Bangladesh.
  The accord is a major improvement on non-binding and voluntary social 
compliance programs that have failed to protect workers from mortal 
workplace dangers. The Accord has widespread support, and signatories 
include fifty major global apparel companies and retailers (including 
U.S. companies Abercrombie & Fitch, Sean John Apparel, and PVH 
Corporation). It has also received the support of civil society and 
international organizations, including the European Parliament, the 
United Nations, and the International Labour Organization.
  The military exchanges should represent the best of American values--
including those of fairness, justice, and commitment to human rights. 
This amendment is an important step toward ensuring that the United 
States military commissaries and exchanges are not unintentionally 
supporting abuses against garment workers in Bangladesh.
  Mr. LYNCH. Madam Chair, this en bloc includes my amendment to address 
a critical aspect of oversight for U.S funds being spent in 
Afghanistan. It requires an assessment of the Afghan National Security 
Forces' (ANSF) capability to operate and manage the facilities 
currently being built for the Afghan National Police and Afghan 
National Army.
  As we speak, the United States is undertaking a process whereby our 
servicemembers, as well as those of our allies, are redeploying. By the 
end of 2014, the Afghans will be fully responsible for their security. 
In the meantime, our efforts are now primarily focused on training the 
Afghans to take on their new role.
  However, we are not only providing training: we are also investing 
millions in constructing facilities to be used by the Afghan Army and 
Police forces. In order to ensure the best use of this funding, we need 
to make sure that the structures will be able to serve the Afghans

[[Page 9118]]

long after we leave. Proper operations and maintenance is the key.
  Unfortunately, there is a serious deficit in this capability. In 
October 2012, the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction, 
or SIGAR, published an audit in which it noted a significant lack of 
trained personnel with the skills to operate and maintain ANSF critical 
facilities. They include vital systems such as water supply, waste 
water treatment and power generation.
  The amendment will require the Department of Defense to assess, and 
report on, Afghan capability to address these needs and what is being 
done to prepare them to be able to do so. It is the best way to ensure 
that our investment will result in a national security force that will 
be able to meet Afghanistan's future security needs.
  I would like to thank the Rules Committee for making this amendment 
in order and the Armed Services Committee for including it in this en 
bloc amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered 
by the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon).
  The en bloc amendments were agreed to.
  Mr. McKEON. Madam Chair, I move that the Committee do now rise.
  The motion was agreed to.
  Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. 
Thornberry) having assumed the chair, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Acting Chair of 
the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported 
that that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 
1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, 
to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for 
other purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.

                          ____________________