[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 159 (2013), Part 5]
[Senate]
[Pages 6247-6248]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              HEALTH CARE

  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, following the leader's comments about 
the health care law, I found it interesting this morning to pick up the 
New York Times and see the headline above the fold, on the front page: 
``New Worries for Democrats on Health Law.'' In the very first 
sentence, it says:

       Democrats are worried that major snags will be exploited by 
     Republicans in next year's mid term elections.

  I would say Democrats ought to be worried about the fact there are 
going to be major problems with this health care law--a health care law 
that was forced through the Senate, forced through the House, without 
listening to the American people. That is the concern Democrats ought 
to have, because the American people's health is being jeopardized as a 
result of the law we are now facing.
  So I come to the floor today to talk a little about what we have 
learned about the President's health care law over the last week--the 
week we have been away traveling our States, visiting with people at 
home. It has been all over the headlines and it is also on the minds of 
the American people. It certainly was in Wyoming. As I talk to 
colleagues from around the country, they have heard a lot about this as 
they traveled their home States.
  When we go back home to our States, a lot of Senators hear from their 
constituents about how worried they are about how this specific law is 
going to affect their care, their jobs, and their paychecks. It is what 
I heard this last week, and it is no different than what I have heard 
week after week after week.
  I practiced medicine for 25 years, and I hear from patients who are 
worried about a new layer of Washington bureaucrats who are going to be 
sitting now between them and their doctor. I hear from families who are 
worried they won't be able to keep the insurance they have now, even 
though the President promised them they would be able to keep the 
insurance they have if they like it. I hear from employers who are 
worried they won't be able to afford all of the law's new requirements. 
That is what people are telling me when I travel the State of Wyoming.
  This is interesting. According to the newspaper ``The Hill,'' which 
came out last week, Wednesday, May 1, I am not the only one. Here is 
the headline on the front page of the paper recently: ``Botched 
ObamaCare Tops Dem Fears for '14.''
  Of course, that is a reference to the 2014 elections. The article 
talks about how anxious a lot of Washington Democrats are about the law 
they voted for. It talks about how, if the rest of the law's 
implementation doesn't go well, voters are going to know exactly who to 
blame.
  Democratic candidates across the country know about it. That is why 
we see a Democratic candidate running today in this special 
congressional election in South Carolina trying to distance herself 
from the health care law. How did she do it? Let's turn the tape back 
to last week's debate in a congressional race: Special election, South 
Carolina. Here is what she had to say.

       Obamacare is extremely problematic, it is expensive, it is 
     a $500 billion higher cost than we originally anticipated, 
     it's cutting into Medicare benefits, and it's having 
     companies lay off their employees because they are worried 
     about the cost of it. That is extremely problematic.

  That is a Democrat, running for Congress, who said that last week. 
The election is today.
  Another Democrat, the chairman of the Energy Committee, had this to 
say.

       There is a reason to be very concerned about what's going 
     to happen with young people. If their premiums shoot up, I 
     can tell you, that is going to wash into the United States 
     Senate in a hurry.

  Well, I agree with the chairman of the Senate Energy Committee. So 
what are the prospects for implementation? Well, one of the key 
architects of the law, another Democrat, says he sees ``a huge train 
wreck coming down.'' That is what Senator Baucus said, and I think he 
is right; we are headed for a train wreck. That is what concerns the 
people I talk to--all those patients, the employers, the families I 
mentioned.
  So what does the President have to say about this? Well, he was asked 
about it the other day at a press conference. The President's answer 
went on for more than 1,000 words, but it came down to one thing. He 
said:

       For the 85 to 90 percent of Americans who already have 
     health insurance, this thing has already happened. They do 
     not have to worry about anything else.

  Can that really be what the President thinks? He even repeated the 
idea a couple of times. He said 90 percent of Americans don't have to 
worry. I would say, with all due respect to the President, people are 
worried, and they have every right to worry. There are many parts of 
this law that still have not ``already happened,'' in spite of what the 
President says. Those things are going to give the American people a 
lot more to worry about.
  In fact, the Washington Post Fact Checker looked into what the 
President said--what the President claimed during his news conference. 
The Fact Checker found the President ignored the fact--completely 
ignored the fact--that 10 million people face the prospect of losing 
their current health care. The Fact Checker went on to cite a report 
from the Congressional Budget Office that said millions of people are 
going to be priced out of the insurance they have now--insurance that 
works for them. That is because of all the expensive extras the new 
government-approved insurance is going to have to cover, and which is 
also government mandated.
  The Post pointed out:

       . . . even unions, which were big supporters of the law, 
     have grown wary because it may drive up costs for their 
     health-care plans.

  Twenty million people are covered by those plans the unions are 
worried about. The Washington Post Fact Checker also cited $1 trillion 
in tax increases in the law, which is going to hurt a lot more people.
  The Medicare Actuary predicts 15 percent of hospitals, skilled 
nursing facilities, and home health agencies could leave the Medicare 
Program by 2019. These are our seniors. These are people who have 
continued to pay into the program. Yet we see these other groups saying 
we have had enough. Why? Because of the cuts to the programs and the 
payments the President is counting on under his health care plan. 
Health insurance costs are continuing to go up, and that affects a lot 
of people, even though President Obama says they have nothing to worry 
about.
  A leading Democratic Member of the Senate was interviewed the other 
day on New York television--his home State--and he conceded the health 
care law is contributing to those cost increases. But the President 
thinks it is nothing to worry about.
  Here is how the New York Times last week summed up the President's 
attitude, under the headline: ``Health Care Law Is `Working Fine,' 
Obama Says in Addressing Criticism.''
  Working fine? Mr. President, tell that to the 22 million Americans 
who can't find a job or who can't get the full-time work they want. 
Tell that to the businesses that have to cut back their workers' hours. 
Why? Because of the health care law. They have to do that because the 
law says companies with more than 50 full-time employees

[[Page 6248]]

have to provide this expensive one-size-fits-all health insurance. So 
we see small businesses have stopped hiring so they can stay below that 
number of employees. Other businesses are cutting full-time workers 
back to part-time status, and cutting their shifts to less than 30 
hours a week.
  Look at the latest jobs report that came out last Friday. In April, 
the number of people working part time because their hours have been 
cut back or because they can't find a full-time job across the country 
increased by 278,000. The shift to more part-time workers also means 
the average workweek is getting shorter. In April it dropped again. 
That is not good for our economy and it is not good for the workers. 
The statistics show we are going in the wrong direction.
  The anecdotal evidence is even worse. Recently, the Regal movie 
theater chain sent a memo to all its employees saying it would roll 
back shifts to keep nonsalaried workers below that 30-hour cutoff. The 
company explained it was forced to take this step ``to comply with the 
Affordable Care Act.''
  We are going to see more and more of this as employers start to 
figure out exactly how hard they are going to be hit by the expensive 
and burdensome health care law. Hiring during the past 4 years under 
President Obama has been weak, and it has also been concentrated in 
nonsalary fields such as retail.
  We saw more of this in the latest jobs report. Nearly 1 out of every 
13 jobs is now in ``food services and drinking places.'' These are the 
kinds of places saying they are going to have to limit hiring and cut 
back shifts to less than 30 hours. Why? Because of the health care law; 
otherwise, they could go bankrupt trying to pay for expensive 
Washington-mandated insurance--insurance much more than is actually 
needed by their workers but insurance that is mandated by the law.
  It is not just bars and restaurants. Let's look at the city of Long 
Beach in California. The Los Angeles Times reports the city of Long 
Beach is limiting most of its 1,600 part-time employees to less than 27 
hours a week, on average. The city says if it doesn't cut the hours, 
the new health benefits would cost up to $2 million more next year. The 
extra expense would trigger layoffs and cutbacks in city services.
  It may be, in the end, that not every one of those 1,600 people will 
have his or her hours cut. Some of the city employees are probably 
already under the 30-hour limit. But for everyone else there is the 
uncertainty of whether their hours are going to be cut and when. The 
uncertainty is part of what is causing employers to hesitate or to cut 
now because nobody knows how bad this train wreck will actually be.
  That is just one of the negative side effects of the President's 
health care law, but it is having ripple effects throughout our entire 
economy. We have seen wages continue to stagnate. We have seen awful 
economic growth. The new numbers for the first quarter GDP growth came 
out a few days ago. They show the economy grew at an annual rate of 
just 2\1/2\ percent. It has been nearly 4 years since the recession 
ended. We should have seen a much more robust economic recovery by now. 
The economy can't grow until we can get Americans back to work. People 
cannot get back to work if there are not more jobs, and employers 
cannot create enough jobs because of the health care law.
  Here is a third thing the President said. He said: ``Even if you do 
everything perfectly, there will still be glitches and bumps.''
  These are not glitches. These are people's jobs. These are people's 
lives. This is the health care of the American people. For a lot of 
American families, the President's health care law is not headed for a 
train wreck, it has already gone off the rails. They are not worried 
about what the health care law is going to do to them, they are busy 
worrying about what the health care law has already done. They know 
this law and the uncertainty it has created is an anchor on our 
economy. Here is how the Chicago Tribune put it in an editorial the 
other day. They asked the question:

       Glitches or a train wreck?

  Then they said:

       Bet on the wreck. We're hurtling toward this massive 
     restructuring of the health care insurance market, and no one 
     has confidence about what will happen. There will be massive 
     consequences, intended and unintended.

  That is what the Chicago Tribune said.
  The President says 90 percent of the American people have nothing to 
worry about from the health care law. He just doesn't get it. When I 
ask groups that I meet with back in Wyoming, I hear nearly 100 percent 
of the people say they expect to pay more under the President's health 
care law, and the care they get--they expect lower quality and less 
available health care as a result of the law.
  People are very concerned about what is going to happen, and they do 
not think it is going to be good for them or for their families.
  A new poll just came out from the Kaiser Family Foundation. It found 
that only 35 percent of Americans have a favorable view of the 
President's health care law. It is less popular now than it was when it 
first passed. It has gone down, actually, 8 percentage points since 
just last November's election. More and more people are realizing what 
is in this law and how it will hurt them personally and they are not 
happy about it. For the President to say otherwise is absurd. He is 
either not paying attention to what the American people are trying to 
tell him or he is intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
  The health care law is headed for a train wreck. Saying it is going 
fine is just the President's Washington spin. The American people 
deserve better than that. They deserve for the President to tell them 
the truth. They deserve to hear from the President, to have him come 
clean on how much his health care law is costing and how much damage it 
is doing to our economy.
  The American people deserve a vote in Congress to repeal this 
disastrous law. Until this law is repealed, we are going to continue to 
see weak economic growth and the American people are going to continue 
to pay the price.
  I yield the floor. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. FRANKEN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the order for the 
quorum call be rescinded.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________