[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 159 (2013), Part 11]
[Senate]
[Pages 16780-16783]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




            DRUG QUALITY AND SECURITY ACT--MOTION TO PROCEED

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I move to proceed to Calendar No. 236.
  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will report the motion.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       Motion to proceed to the bill (H.R. 3204) to amend the 
     Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to human 
     drug compounding and drug supply chain security, and for 
     other purposes.


                   Recognition of the Minority Leader

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader is recognized.
  Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I thank the majority leader for giving 
me an opportunity to speak first this morning due to a commitment I 
have away from the Capitol.


                        tribute to billy graham

  Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I want to start out this morning by 
saying a few words about a man who has earned the respect and 
admiration of countless Americans for his energy, courage, and 
faithfulness to a calling that he first received about 75 years ago on 
a late-night walk around the Temple Terrace Golf Course in Tampa. The 
son of a North Carolina dairy farmer, Billy Graham turns 95 today. And 
I just want to join all the others across the country and around the 
world in thanking this good and humble servant for his decades of 
ministry and tireless preaching of the Gospel that he loves.
  In a career that spans generations, Billy Graham has walked the halls 
of power and counseled presidents and kings. But he has never forgotten 
his mission in life. And while he may not be able to preach at the 
giant rallies that made him a household name, he is still finding new 
ways to share his faith with a world in need of healing, hope, and 
purpose. Tonight, at the age of 95, Billy Graham will preach what's 
been called his final message to America.
  Growing up, Billy Graham wanted to be a baseball player. Thankfully, 
God had different plans. And ever since that night in Tampa, he's put 
his extraordinary natural talents and generosity of spirit at the 
service of others.
  Billy Graham's first crusade took place in the Civic Auditorium in 
Grand Rapids, MI, in September 1947. In the decades to come, more than 
400 crusades would follow in more than 185 countries and territories on 
six continents. At one memorable crusade in South Korea, more than one 
million people showed up to hear the powerful preaching and the hopeful 
message of the Reverend Billy Graham.
  Billy Graham may be the only preacher with a star on the Hollywood 
Walk of Fame. But he never let that celebrity get to his head. I am 
sure he would say that his beloved Ruth helped keep him focused. And it 
is a credit to both of them that all five of the Graham children are 
carrying on the family legacy today.
  As Billy Graham has receded from public life in recent years, we have 
missed the steady, reassuring presence that he lent to moments such as 
the Oklahoma City bombing and 9/11. But we have been consoled to know 
that he is still there on his mountain retreat in Montreat, NC. Billy 
Graham once said that ``God has given us two hands, one to receive with 
and the other to give with.'' So today, I join countless others in 
sending our own message of thanks to a man who has been called 
``America's pastor,'' and to say how grateful we are for the life and 
witness of the Reverend Billy Graham.


                               OBAMACARE

  Mr. President, on an entirely different matter, yesterday Secretary 
Sebelius came back to Capitol Hill to testify about ObamaCare. We did 
not learn much from her testimony, but some of the Q-and-A was actually 
pretty revealing. She admitted that the number of folks who have 
enrolled in ObamaCare is ``very low.''
  When pressed on the administration's promise that ObamaCare would 
drive down premiums, here is what she said about premium rates on the 
individual market: ``I didn't say they are going down.''
  When asked if convicted felons could become ObamaCare navigators and 
acquire Americans' sensitive information, here is what she said: ``It's 
possible.''
  These revelations are really concerning. Americans were counting on 
the President's claim that their families' premiums would go down, not 
up, under a new health regime. Americans who have lost their insurance 
and find themselves forced into the exchanges--the last thing they need 
is to worry about some felon stealing their identity.
  To many Americans the administration still seems more interested in 
deflecting blame than taking responsibility for the real harm this law 
is causing. Yesterday's hearing did little to dispel that notion.
  By now we have heard our friends on the left blame just about 
everyone and everything for the disaster they forced on our country--
everyone and everything, of course, except themselves. They have tried 
to blame the same contractors they hired. They blame the Republicans. 
They blame the tea party. I am sure they have even tried to pin this on 
George W. Bush. Of course, the administration has repeatedly tried to 
blame insurance companies for lost plans too. But here is what the 
Washington Post Fact Checker had to say about that:

       The administration's effort to pin the blame on insurance 
     companies is a classic case of misdirection.

  That is the Washington Post--``a classic case of misdirection.'' They 
got three Pinocchios for that whopper.
  Unfortunately, that does not seem to have deterred our friends on the 
other side from indulging in the blame game. Within just the past week 
we have seen the White House lash out at the words of a cancer survivor 
and try to point a finger of blame at Texans. A few days ago--get this 
one--one of the President's political allies attacked the very kind of 
folks who are now losing their health coverage under ObamaCare. ``Free 
riders,'' he called them. ``Free riders.'' You know the folks he is 
talking about. These are not folks who

[[Page 16781]]

have done anything wrong. They are not free loaders or free riders or 
anything else; they are our neighbors, our constituents, and they are 
not looking for handouts from the government. In fact, these are folks 
who went out and spent their own hard-earned money--not taxpayer 
money--to purchase the kind of health protection that best suits their 
families. For this, the President's allies attacked them? Many just 
want the government to leave them alone. Many just want to be able to 
keep the plans they like instead of only the plans the President likes. 
They want to keep the plans they like, not the ones the President in 
effect picks for them.
  Here is what a small business owner in North Carolina said after his 
premiums shot up 400 percent: ``I just wish I could have my insurance 
back.'' That is what he said. ``I just wish I could have my insurance 
back.''
  I just read this morning about a constituent who lost his insurance 
and is finding that policies on the exchange will be more than double 
his premium and increase his annual deductible. That is partly because 
as a 31-year-old single male he will now be required to buy a policy 
with features he doesn't need, such as pediatric dental care and 
maternity care. ``It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me,'' he 
said.
  Another constituent from Caldwell County had this to say after 
learning of changes to her plan: ``My husband and I work hard, pay a 
lot in taxes and ask for little from our government. Is it asking too 
much for the government to stay out of my health insurance?''
  No, it is not asking too much. It is simply taking the President at 
his word for the promise he made over and over, the promise that so 
many Democrats here in Washington made to their constituents but that 
we now know is simply not true.
  I understand the White House is in a tight spot. They did a poor job 
preparing the country for this law, they wasted time making promises 
that simply could not pan out, and they chose to ignore the warnings 
from my party and experts across the country that these kinds of things 
would, indeed, happen. This is the result, and people are getting hurt. 
Premiums are rising, taxes are going up for millions in the middle 
class, folks are losing access to hospitals and doctors they like.
  At this point, more Americans have lost health coverage than have 
gained it. As I mentioned yesterday, more than 50 times as many 
Kentuckians have lost private health coverage as have signed up for 
private plans on the State exchange. That is 280,000 folks we are 
talking about in my State, 280,000 Kentuckians who have lost their 
insurance. In Louisiana we are talking about 80,000 folks; in Kentucky, 
280,000; up in Minnesota, 140,000 people; and close to half a million 
people in Georgia have lost their insurance.
  It is way past time for our Democratic friends to end the blame game. 
Instead, they need to start acknowledging the consequences of their law 
and actually do something about the mess they created. If they are 
ready to do so, Republicans are willing to help. Let's work together to 
undo the harm of ObamaCare and start over with real, bipartisan, cost-
saving reforms, reforms that will actually allow Americans to keep the 
health plans they like. That is the kind of reform Americans really 
want. If Democrats are ready to work with us, we can give them just 
that.


                   Recognition of the Majority leader

  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Booker). The majority leader is 
recognized.


                                Schedule

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, following my remarks the Senate will resume 
consideration of S. 815, which is the Employment Non-Discrimination 
Act. At 11:45 there will be two rollcall votes, first on the Toomey 
amendment and then a cloture vote on the bill. If cloture is invoked, 
there will be a third rollcall vote on passage of the Employment Non-
Discrimination Act.


                        Tribute to Billy Graham

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I am happy to join with my friend in happy 
birthday wishes for Billy Graham. I have not had the good fortune to 
meet this man, but I have read his book. I read a biography of him. He 
is such a personality I thought that was something I should do, and I 
did.
  I remember a lot of things about the book. The one thing I do 
remember is this: He is so scrupulous in making sure there is never any 
question about his integrity, his moral integrity. We have had a lot of 
problems with people preaching who do not turn out to be so good. But 
Billy Graham, among other things, would never meet a female in his 
office without the door being wide open so people could see everything 
that was going on in that room. That is just an indication of the kind 
of person he is.
  I join with my friend in congratulating Billy Graham in his 95th 
year.


                              Health Care

  The remarks of my friend, the Republican leader, kind of remind me of 
a joke that is not very funny, but it is a joke and I think it makes 
the point. Prison setting--these people run out of material for jokes. 
They are there together all the time and hear the same joke day after 
day. So they decided what they would do is they would list the best 
jokes from 1 to 50, and rather than tell the joke over and over, they 
would just yell a number and people would laugh.
  That is what we have here. Why don't our Republican colleagues just 
number from 1 through 50 their criticisms of ObamaCare, and rather than 
coming and giving these speeches, I think we would be much better off 
if they would just give us a number and we would all--because we have 
heard these speeches so many times--immediately laugh because basically 
they are jokes too.
  It is too bad that the Republican leader and many of his Republican 
colleagues want to keep fighting an old fight. Four years ago we passed 
the health care reform bill. The President signed it, the Supreme Court 
upheld it, and it is the law of the land. Of course, we want to make it 
better, and certainly with what has happened with the rollout of the 
Web site, we need to do that. But I wish our Republican colleagues 
would stop trying to scare people out of participating in this program. 
If they would stop fighting last year's fights and move on and try to 
do the business of the American people, we would all be better off.
  We can look back at the big changes we have made in legislation and 
we have made some big changes over the years in this body and some of 
those matters dealt with health care.
  I was not here when Medicare passed, but I remember how important it 
was, because at the time it passed, I was the chairman of the board of 
trustees--an elected official in Nevada--with the biggest hospital 
district in Nevada. They had lots of beds and lots of patients. So I 
remember the impact of Medicare. We also know Medicare did not become 
popular overnight. There were a lot of criticisms about it.
  Although not nearly as big as ObamaCare or Medicare, I was here when 
we passed--under the leadership of President Bush No. 2--the Medicare 
drug benefit bill. A number of us didn't like that. We thought it 
didn't go far enough and that it should have been done differently, but 
it passed in this body and became the law of the land. It was difficult 
to get that up and running, but we did not come to the floor and say: 
Get rid of this bill. We believed, as imperfect as it was, it was the 
beginning of building support and doing something about health care in 
America.
  I wish my Republican colleagues would do something constructive 
regarding health care. We have not heard one positive remark about what 
they would do to change what we have already done. I think we would all 
be better off if that were, in fact, the case. This legislation is 
working, and it will work even better when we get the issues regarding 
the Web site worked out.
  There are people in Nevada, there are people in New Jersey, there are 
people in Indiana, and there are people all over America today who are 
benefiting as a result of what happened 4 years ago in the Senate and 
the House of Representatives when the President signed the bill.

[[Page 16782]]

  I am sure the Presiding Officer, and other people who are listening 
to this speech, can identify with someone who has or had a preexisting 
disability. Under the old law, if you were a woman, it was a 
preexisting disability. You could be charged differently because you 
were a woman. A child born with diabetes, an adult with diabetes, 
someone who had been in an automobile accident, someone who was--my 
friend Tony Coelho, who was one of the leaders when I served in the 
House with him, was an epileptic. He had a preexisting disability, and 
that is an understatement.
  We could go on and on. If you are under age 18, it doesn't matter if 
you have a preexisting disability. At the first of the year, you can be 
an adult and have a preexisting disability and you can get insurance. 
In many States we extended the preexisting disability exemption to 
adults. It is already in effect in a number of States because under the 
law the States had the authority to do that, and the Federal Government 
will help them.
  The Bush drug benefit was flawed. What did we do with it? We didn't 
try to get rid of it, we improved it. The so-called doughnut hole is 
being filled and millions of senior citizens, and Americans over the 
last 4 years, have received millions and millions of dollars in 
benefits because our drugs are cheaper.
  I have talked on this floor before, and I will say it again--in my 
hometown of Searchlight, NV, there was a young man who was in college 
and on his parents' insurance. In Nevada you could stay on your 
parents' insurance until you were 23 years old. Within a matter of 
weeks of turning 23, he started getting very sick. He had testicular 
cancer. His parents had no money. One of my friends who is a 
neurologist did the surgery for free, but he had two other surgeries 
that were not free.
  His parents had no money; one was a retired operating engineer and 
one worked part-time in a post office there in Searchlight. They 
struggled, and their son Jeff has been taken care of. Many people don't 
have the benefit of his parents who sacrificed a great deal for their 
boy. That is no longer a problem. Children can stay on their parents' 
insurance for 3 more years, and that would have allowed Jeff, and other 
men and women just like him, to get out of school.
  ObamaCare is a wonderful piece of legislation for America. Let's make 
it better. Stop carping about this. Get over it. It is the law. It is 
the legacy of Barack Obama and always will be. Let's make it better and 
stop the mischievous, unfortunate speeches out here every day about how 
bad it is. Talk about the good things in this bill and help us work to 
make it better.


                   Employment Non-discrimination Act

  This afternoon the Senate will vote to advance the Employment Non-
Discrimination Act. It is legislation that will protect all Americans 
from workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender 
identity. The vote on cloture on the bill will take place before lunch 
and vote on final passage will take place before the caucus adjourns. 
We will start voting at 1:45 this afternoon.
  I do hope and expect a bipartisan vote, a good one, to extend 
safeguards against workplace harassment and discrimination to every 
American. The time has come for Congress to pass a Federal law that 
ensures all citizens, regardless of where they live, can go to work 
unafraid of being who they are.
  More than 80 percent of the American people think that is already the 
law. It is not already the law, but that is what they think, so let's 
just do what the American people think already exists.
  I appreciate Chairman Harkin. He is a devoted person for people who 
need help. If you ever wondered how C-SPAN has closed captioning, it is 
because Tom Harkin led the fight here for many years in the Senate to 
provide closed captioning. He has a brother who is hearing impaired, 
and because of that, he was focused on providing closed captioning. We 
have all kinds of good things for the disabled thanks to Tom Harkin. 
The disabilities act, which is so important for our country, is now the 
law. So I appreciate Chairman Harkin's work on this legislation. It is 
a shame for Iowa and the country that he has decided not to run for 
reelection. What a good man.
  Jeff Merkley, from Oregon, also worked on this legislation. He has 
devoted huge amounts of time to this legislation, and I admire and 
respect him so very much. I respect and appreciate the leadership of 
these two fine Senators.
  I hope Speaker Boehner will reconsider his decision not to bring this 
up for a vote in the House of Representatives. This legislation would 
pass by a nice margin in the House if the Speaker would allow a vote on 
it.
  I can't understand what is going on in the House of Representatives. 
Legislation the American people want is held up over there. The farm 
bill would save this country $23 billion, and they will not bring it 
up. The American people want this. There are reforms in the legislation 
that Senator Stabenow and others have worked so hard to put in place 
for decades. They are in this bill. The House is holding this up.
  Immigration reform. America wants immigration reform. They are going 
to get it, but it is just too bad that it is being fought every step of 
the way by my friend, the Speaker. Comprehensive immigration reform is 
something that is needed in this body; it is needed in the House. We 
have already passed it. It should be the law of the land. They seem to 
be so focused on debt reduction. Well, immigration reform saves $1 
trillion of debt.
  Marketplace fairness would allow little strip mall operators and 
small businesses to have the same benefits others have. It is unfair 
that brick-and-mortar businesses that pay rent cannot be competitive 
with the businesses on the Internet that pay no sales tax. The House is 
holding that up, and now they are holding this up. That is just another 
piece of legislation that people around America support and the House 
is holding up. I hope the Speaker will reconsider his position.


                     D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

  I will also file cloture today on the nomination of a highly 
qualified jurist to serve on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The 
D.C. Circuit is often called the second highest court in the land. No 
one has debated that in any other way. It is so important. It is no 
wonder why. Here is what former D.C. Circuit Chief Judge Patricia Wald 
said of the court's caseload: ``The D.C. Circuit hears the most 
complex, time-consuming, labyrinthine disputes over regulations with 
the greatest impact on ordinary Americans' lives.''
  It is unfortunate that Republicans are filibustering another talented 
and dedicated public servant nominated to service on this crucial 
court.
  Georgetown law professor Nina Pillard is the next victim of what the 
Republicans are doing. She graduated magna cum laude from Yale and 
attended Harvard Law School. For 5 years she litigated individual and 
class action racial discrimination cases as an attorney for the NAACP 
Legal Defense Fund.
  She served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General and Assistant 
Solicitor General. Support for her confirmation is bipartisan. Two top 
Justice Department officials from the Bush era, Assistant Attorney 
General Viet Dinh and former FBI Director William Sessions, have 
supported her nomination.
  Professor Pillard is also faculty codirector of the Supreme Court 
Institute at Georgetown, which helps attorneys to argue cases before 
the High Court. She brings a wealth of knowledge to the job. She has 
argued nine cases before the Supreme Court and has written briefs for 
another 25. Her arguments helped open the Virginia Military Institute 
to women in 1997 and beat back a constitutional challenge of the Family 
and Medical Leave Act.
  She is qualified and dedicated. It is truly a shame that Republicans 
would filibuster this nomination for unrelated political reasons. The 
D.C. Circuit is currently operating with only 8 of its 11 seats. While 
Senate Republicans are blocking President Obama's nominees to this 
vital court, they were happy to confirm judges to the D.C. Circuit when 
President Reagan and both President Bushes were in office.
  Republicans have already blocked two exceedingly qualified nominees 
to the D.C. Circuit, Caitlin Halligan and

[[Page 16783]]

Patricia Millett. I hope my Republican colleagues will not block 
another qualified nominee when we vote on cloture on this matter next 
week. This nominee deserves a fair confirmation process and a simple 
up-or-down vote.


                       Reservation of Leader Time

  Mr. REID. Would the Chair announce the business of the day.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, leadership time is 
reserved.

                          ____________________