[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 159 (2013), Part 10]
[Senate]
[Pages 13899-13900]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              HEALTH CARE

  Mr. MURPHY. Mr. President, I read the papers down here and across the 
country. It makes it look as if the issue of whether we are going to 
move forward with the implementation of the health care bill passed a 
few years ago is just about politics. It is just a political football 
that is being tossed back and forth between the two sides.
  While the threats are empty, there is no way we are going to pass a 
continuing resolution that is not going to include funding of this 
vital health care law, it still gets an enormous amount of play out 
there. I think it is important for us to come down to the floor and 
explain to the American people that this issue is not political, that 
the health care law is not just a piece of paper.
  The health care law is a lifeline to millions of families out there 
across America who have been absolutely drowning in health care costs 
and an inability to access the system over the past several decades. We 
did not pass this law to score political points. We did not do it to 
make ourselves feel good. We did it because we saw almost immeasurable 
human suffering out on the streets of America to which this place 
needed to respond.
  It is not OK that in the most affluent, most powerful country in the 
world, about 15 percent of our society has the potential to go to bed 
sick every night simply because they cannot afford to see a doctor. It 
is certainly not OK that 50 percent of the bankruptcies in this country 
historically have been caused by the misfortune of an individual or a 
family member to get sick.
  So I think it is time that when we talk about the implementation of 
the health care law, ObamaCare, whatever you want to call it, we are 
talking about consequences that are not political. They are 
consequences related to life or death.
  That is not hyperbole. There are people out there every week dying 
because

[[Page 13900]]

they do not have access to our Nation's health care system which, if 
you can find it, is and can be the best health care system in the 
world.
  The problem is there are far too many people who have no insurance 
and no way to access it or who are vastly underinsured and cannot get 
the right access to it. So I just want to talk for a minute about what 
this is going to mean to our constituents, to your neighbors, and what 
it would mean if, by some miracle of politics, the tea party gets its 
way and this bill was no longer the law of the land come next month.
  Let me tell you what it already means for a senior citizen who is 
living on $20,000 a year in New Britain, CT. Today, that senior citizen 
gets to walk in to their doctor to get a wellness visit. They do not 
have to pay anything out of pocket any longer. Previously they did. You 
would think that is not a lot of money. But for someone in Connecticut 
who is living on a fixed income or somebody in Delaware who is taking 
home a pretty meager Social Security check every month, the costs 
escalate when you are just trying to pay your rent or your mortgage, 
put food on the table, be able to put gas in your car to get back and 
forth to see your grandkids.
  That extra expense of having to pay for preventive costs can actually 
make a difference.
  For those seniors who have pretty high drug costs, one of the worst 
things this Congress did over the last 10 years was pass a prescription 
drug bill that had this doughnut hole sitting in the middle of it. If 
you paid for a bunch of drugs through the Medicare benefit, eventually 
you would have to start paying out of your own pocket. That could be 
thousands of dollars that senior citizens don't have.
  This health care bill closes the doughnut hole, eliminates half of it 
almost overnight and then essentially eliminates it over time. That is 
thousands of dollars in savings for seniors. That is medication that, 
frankly, a lot of seniors would never have been able to buy but they 
will now be able to access because of this law.
  Those things go away if Republicans get their way and ObamaCare is 
defunded. All of a sudden, if that happens, tomorrow senior citizens 
have to pay out of pocket for preventive costs. Seniors who have high 
drug costs all of a sudden have to go back to paying 100 percent of the 
cost of generics versus 50 percent, which is what they are paying now.
  What about the average family of four who today in Connecticut is 
paying about $605 a month for health care? Probably the health care 
plan is not that good to begin with. It probably has some significant 
holes in it in terms of what it will cover.
  If this health care bill is implemented, which it will be, that 
number goes down from $605 a month to $286 a month for the average 
family of four in Connecticut.
  Let me tell you, the average family of four in Connecticut living in 
Stamford, Bridgeport, Norwalk, or Norwich, could use that extra $300 in 
savings to help save for college, to help put a bit more nutritious 
meal on the table, maybe to pay some back credit card bills. Three 
hundred dollars is a big deal. That is the big difference this health 
care bill will make, $605 a month down to $286 in Connecticut. It is a 
big difference. It is an even bigger difference because the health care 
plan they are going to get for $286 a month is going to be a good one.
  We are going to finally have some standardization when it comes to 
the benefits you are getting. When you buy the health care plan in 
Connecticut or wherever you are, you are going to know what you are 
getting. There is going to be a minimum set of benefits that is going 
to be covered. You are going to be able to know that when you buy 
insurance you are getting ambulatory patient services, coverage for 
hospitalization, coverage for maternity and newborn care, your 
prescription drugs are covered, lab services, and rehab benefits. Every 
plan is going to be able to cover these things, but not if the health 
care law were magically repealed.
  All of a sudden people who were counting on that number going from 
$600 to $300 in Connecticut will be paying $600, probably $700, $800, 
and they will continue to have to deal with a dizzying array of benefit 
packages, many of which simply don't measure up to what families need.
  What about for Betty Berger? What does this mean for her? She is a 
constituent of mine in Meriden. She doesn't want anyone to ever have to 
go through what she went through. She and her husband had health care 
coverage for themselves and their kids through her husband's plan. Her 
husband switched jobs. In the week of time between when he was at his 
first job and his second job, their son was diagnosed with cancer. Her 
husband's second job identified it as a preexisting condition and 
effectively refused to cover the son.
  The Bergers lost everything. They lost their house, they lost their 
car, they lost their savings simply because their son was diagnosed 
with cancer during the 1 week in which the husband wasn't employed. 
That will never, ever happen again after this bill is implemented. No 
insurance plan regulated under this bill can deny a family access for 
health care simply because one of their family members is sick. It is 
unconscionable that ever happened in this country, and it will not 
happen again if this bill is implemented. But if the Republicans get 
what they want and this bill is defunded, if this bill is repealed in 
that magical fantasy world, the example of the Bergers happens hundreds 
of thousands of times over across the country.
  Lastly, what about the McCullough family, another family in 
Connecticut? Little Kyle McCullough, when I first met him, was 8. He is 
probably now 10 or 11 years old. He has a very complicated disease for 
which he has to take $3,000 injections. He will hit his lifetime limit 
in a matter of years and his family will be on the hook for every 
expense thereafter. The health care bill says no more annual, no more 
lifetime limits for health care coverage. You could have health care 
insurance that is going to take care of little Kyle McCullough for as 
long as he needs those injections, at whatever cost it is going to be.
  It is insurance. Because for people who have a bad lot in life and 
have a big, complicated, expensive, illness they are going to be 
covered. If the health care bill is repealed, defunded, or whatever 
Republicans want to do, Kyle McCullough's family has to pay for that 
out of pocket for the rest of their life, as will thousands of other 
families like them.
  That is what the stakes are. It is not a piece of paper. It is not a 
political football. It is life and death. It is hundreds, if not 
thousands, of dollars that hard-working families throughout this 
country desperately need and a health care system they need to be much 
more fair and much more compassionate.
  It is not going to happen. It is political fantasy that Republicans 
are going to be able to defund or repeal the health care law as a 
consequence of the budget debates we are going to have over the next 
few weeks.
  Let's be honest about what they are asking. They are asking for 
higher costs for seniors; they are asking for higher costs for middle-
class families; they are asking for more bankruptcies; and they are 
asking for more misery for the thousands of families who are struggling 
to keep their heads above water when they deal with a complicated 
illness. That is the true reality of what is happening out there today 
in our health care system that is getting better by the day and will 
get even better if we move forward with the implementation of the 
health care law.
  I yield the floor, and I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________