[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 159 (2013), Part 10]
[House]
[Pages 13795-13796]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              {time}  1015
                                  SNAP

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from 
Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky) for 5 minutes.
  Ms. SCHAKOWSKY. Mr. Speaker, I think each one of us 435 has to ask 
ourselves, Is this really what we were sent here to do, to take food 
out of the mouths of hungry people, nearly half of them children? 
That's what's at stake this week when we are asked to vote on 
legislation that would cut $39 billion from one of our Nation's most 
successful and important programs, the Supplemental Nutrition 
Assistance Program, SNAP. It used to be called food stamps.
  As a Jew, we just came through the Jewish holidays, and we talked 
about what it means to be a human being in this world, in this country. 
Every major religion in this world and represented in this House 
teaches that you feed the hungry. Not as charity, but as a mandate, 
because that's what it is to be a human being in our world. All the 
religions have written letters and implored us not to do this.
  I participated three times in the congressional food stamp challenge 
in which we eat on $31.50 for an entire week. I'm not complaining about 
it because I knew it was just a week and it would end, but that's the 
average SNAP benefit. You know what? You can get the calories. That's 
pretty easy if you're lucky enough to live near a grocery store and not 
in a food desert. The reality for 48 million people is that you can get 
the calories, but it's really hard to get the nutrition. By the time 
you get to the fruits and vegetables, which are quite expensive, it's 
hard to do it. It's not comfortable to rely on SNAP benefits, and many 
people line up at the end of the month at food pantries that are 
everywhere in this country, including some of the richest districts. 
But the SNAP program, which has a bipartisan history, is the last line

[[Page 13796]]

of defense between 48 million Americans and chronic hunger.
  The House already voted down a farm bill that included $20 billion in 
SNAP cuts, and it would have taken benefits away from up to a million 
children and would have prevented 200,000 hungry children from getting 
the school lunches that they rely on so much. Now this bill is back but 
on steroids. In addition to all of the devastating cuts that have been 
proposed, those that were rejected earlier, the new bill would prevent 
any able-bodied adult from getting more than 3 months of SNAP benefits 
during a 3-year period, even if they're unable to find work. Up to 
170,000 of those who are veterans who served our country would be 
denied. This is at a time when unemployment among low-income Americans 
is over 20 percent and the average time of unemployment is about 9 
months. Those numbers don't add up. It means that passage of this bill 
could nearly starve those looking for work, and no one can deny that 
fact.
  I know how SNAP benefits my constituents, and I know what would 
happen if those benefits were lost. I've attended several events at 
food pantries and community centers, and each time I've heard 
resounding support for SNAP. In just one day, I received 242 postcards 
from my constituents urging me to oppose these dangerous cuts to the 
SNAP program. They have my vote, and I'm imploring my colleagues that 
it should have the vote of every Member of this body to reject those 
cuts.
  A constituent who previously wrote to my office summed up her 
thoughts about the importance of funding the SNAP program this way. 
Here's what she said:

       Hungry thoughts every waking day are my constant companion 
     here in the supposedly wealthiest country on Earth. Please 
     have compassion for your low-income and fixed-income 
     constituents who are loyal, patriotic Americans and who are 
     in dire need of nutritious and affordable food.

  A former SNAP beneficiary, a woman named Dresden Shumaker, described 
the program as a trampoline rather than a safety net. Because of SNAP, 
she was able to make ends meet for her young family during a period of 
time of great need. Her story is similar to most SNAP beneficiaries who 
no longer need food assistance within one year of receiving benefits.
  I'm begging my colleagues, please, don't support these cuts. Let's be 
the value-driven country that we are and vote ``no'' to the $40 billion 
cut to SNAP.

                          ____________________