[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 159 (2013), Part 1]
[Senate]
[Pages 1272-1273]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           A CASE OF AMNESIA

  Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, after listening to President Obama's 
State of the Union speech last night, I was left scratching my head. 
Essentially, the President wants us to pretend the last 4 years never 
happened. He wants us to pretend his economic policies have delivered a 
strong recovery from the recession of 2008; he wants us to pretend his 
administration has made real progress on reducing the national debt; 
and he wants us to pretend that more taxes, more spending, and more 
debt are the key to middle-class prosperity. In other words, the 
President is hoping we all have a case of amnesia.
  He wants us to forget about $5.8 trillion in new debt that was racked 
up during his first term--$5.8 trillion. He wants us to forget our 
gross national debt is now larger than our entire economy--100 percent 
of our gross domestic product. He wants us to forget the debt is 
projected to grow even further, to $26 trillion, by 2023; and he wants 
us to forget his health care bill will increase taxes by $1 trillion 
over the next 10 years. He wants us to forget America's credit rating 
has been downgraded for the first time in our history.
  He also wants us to forget we have been suffering through the weakest 
economic recovery since the Great Depression, as well as the highest, 
longest period of high unemployment since the Great Depression.
  He wants us to forget that nearly 4 out of every 10 unemployed 
Americans have been jobless for at least 6 months. He wants us to 
forget that the average family median income has fallen by nearly 
$2,500 since the official end of the recession. He wants us to forget 
that the cost of health insurance for the average American family has 
increased by more than $2,300. And he wants us to forget that as part 
of the fiscal cliff negotiation, the payroll tax went back up, taking 
an additional bite out of the check of middle-class workers.
  Last night President Obama said we should ask ourselves three 
questions every day--those of us with the privilege of serving here in 
the Nation's Capital in the Congress and in the administration. He 
said: No. 1, how do we attract more jobs to our shores? No. 2, how do 
we equip people with the skills they need in order to get those jobs? 
And No. 3, how do we make sure hard work leads to a decent living? I 
may have my differences with President Obama on a number of policies, 
but I actually think those are really good questions.
  If the President is truly serious about finding the answers to those 
questions, this may not surprise my colleagues, but he need look only 
to the model reflected in my home State of Texas.
  I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record an article 
entitled ``The Texas Growth Machine'' at the end of my remarks.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  (See exhibit 1.)
  Mr. CORNYN. The fact is our State relies on a simple economic model 
the Federal Government could emulate if it would like to have similar 
positive results: lower taxes, limited government, sensible 
regulations, and progrowth energy policies.
  I know the occupant of the chair comes from a State that I believe is 
the second largest producer of oil and gas in the country--second only 
to Texas--and I know the Presiding Officer has seen the economic engine 
that is created when we unleash our potential when it comes to our 
energy resources. These are policies that recently helped Texas turn a 
$5 billion deficit during the recession into an $8.8 billion surplus. 
These are the policies that made our State a robust engine of job 
creation that is attracting Americans from all across the country. The 
total number of jobs in Texas since 1995 has grown at the rate of 32 
percent. When we compare that with the rate of growth of jobs in 
America nationwide, we see it is 12 percent--32 percent to 12 percent. 
That is not an accident.
  Texas is also a leader in the creation of high-paying jobs. Between 
2002 and 2012, our State accounted for close to one-third of all U.S. 
private sector job growth in industries that pay more than 150 percent 
of the average wage, even though we have only 8 percent of America's 
total population.
  Last night the President talked about, How do we get middle-class 
wages up? His prescription was an increase in the minimum wage, but I 
say why don't we look at ways to achieve a maximum wage by creating 
private sector, high-paying, good jobs, as we have been successful in 
doing in Texas and as a few other States have done as well.
  After 4 years of trillion-dollar deficits and historically high 
unemployment--right now our unemployment rate is roughly 7.9 percent, 
but that doesn't really account for all of the people who have since 
given up looking for work, and it is estimated that more than 20 
million Americans either are out of work or they are working part time 
when they would like to work full time, but they can't find those kinds 
of jobs.
  I believe it is time for the President and this Congress to try a new 
approach. The great thing about our system of government--of shared 
sovereignty between the States and the National Government--is that we 
have essentially laboratories of democracy all around our country where 
we can try different things to see what works and what does not work. I 
only hope the President and Congress will look at those places around 
the country where the policies actually work in creating jobs and 
economic growth.
  I believe it is time for the President to embrace policies that will 
encourage private entrepreneurship, private sector job creation, income 
growth, and greater domestic energy production. In short, it is time 
for him to embrace the Texas model.

                               Exhibit 1

                        The Texas Growth Machine

                            (By Wendell Cox)

       The American economy has had little to cheer about since 
     the 2008 financial meltdown and the resulting recession. 
     Recovery has been feeble, and many states continue to 
     struggle. One bright spot in the general gloom, however, is 
     Texas, which began shining long before 2008. Not only has 
     Texas created jobs at a stunning rate; it has also--pace 
     critics like the New York Times's Paul Krugman--created lots 
     of good jobs. Indeed, the rest of the nation could turn to 
     the Lone Star State as a model for dynamic growth, as a close 
     look at employment data shows.
       The first thing to point out is that Texan job creation has 
     far outpaced the national average. The number of jobs in 
     Texas has grown by a truly impressive 31.5 percent since 
     1995, compared with just 12 percent nationwide, according to 
     Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Texas has also lapped 
     California, an important economic rival and the only state 
     with a larger population. The Texas employment situation 
     after the financial crisis was far less spectacular, of 
     course, with the number of jobs growing just 2.4 percent from 
     2009 through 2011. But that was still six times the anemic 
     0.4 percent growth rate of the overall American economy.
       The National Establishment Time-Series (NETS) Database, 
     which provides detailed information on job creation and loss 
     for firms headquartered in each state, can tell us more about 
     Texas's employment growth. NETS data are divided into two 
     periods--the first from 1995 to 2002, the second from 2002 to 
     2009. During the 2002-09 period, small businesses of fewer 
     than ten employees were the Texas employment engine, adding 
     nearly 800,000 new jobs; of those, about three-quarters were 
     in firms with two to nine employees. Larger Texas companies--
     those with 500 or more employees--lost a significant number 
     of jobs over this span, and medium-size firms likewise 
     shrank, trends that also showed up on the national level.
       Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows that many of the new 
     Texas jobs paid well. Indeed, Texas did comparatively better 
     than the rest of the United States from 2002 through 2011. 
     For industries paying over 150 percent of the average 
     American wage, Texas

[[Page 1273]]

     could claim 216,000 extra jobs; the rest of the country added 
     495,000. In other words, the Lone Star State, with 8 percent 
     of the U.S. population, created nearly a third of the 
     country's highest-paying positions. Texas also added 49,000 
     positions paying 125 percent to 150 percent of the U.S. 
     average; the rest of the country lost 174,000 jobs in that 
     category. Two sectors in which Texas employment did 
     particularly well during the same period were natural-
     resource extraction (in fact, the state gained 80 percent of 
     all new jobs in the country in that field) and professional, 
     scientific, and technical positions. Both job categories 
     boast average wages far higher than the national overall 
     average. As happens whenever an economy grows, Texas also 
     added hundreds of thousands of positions in food services, 
     health care, and other lower-paid fields, in addition to the 
     more lucrative jobs. Texas did lose 10,000 construction jobs, 
     but that was a modest downturn, in light of the massive 
     national slowdown in building caused by the crisis of 2008.
       Vital to the economic health of Texas is that people are 
     moving to its cities in droves. In 2011, Houston surpassed 
     Philadelphia in population and became the country's fifth-
     biggest metropolitan region, with 6.1 million people. Dallas-
     Fort Worth, with 6.5 million, was already the country's 
     fourth-biggest. The two cities trail only New York City, Los 
     Angeles, and Chicago, marking the first time that a single 
     state has had two metros in the country's top five since the 
     Census Bureau began designating these areas a century ago. 
     Meanwhile, of all metropolitan areas in the country with more 
     than 1 million residents, the fastest-growing from 2010 to 
     2011 was Austin.
       Though the national downturn has slowed job creation in 
     Texas's cities, they're still adding jobs, sometimes briskly, 
     unlike many other American metropolitan regions. Austin's 
     strong information-technology sector and government-related 
     work (the city is Texas's state capital) helped propel 4.3 
     percent job growth from 2009 through 2011 (and 15.3 percent 
     growth from 2002 through 2009). The number of jobs in 
     McAllen, which benefits from increased trade with Mexico 
     under the North American Free Trade Agreement, grew 3.7 
     percent. Job growth in economically diverse Houston has 
     matched or exceeded the state rate since 1995.
       What accounts for the resilience of the Texas economy, 
     which has outperformed the rest of the country not only over 
     the long term but during the Great Recession as well? A pro-
     business climate has unquestionably been a substantial 
     advantage. In its annual ranking of business environments, 
     Chief Executive has named Texas the most growth-friendly 
     state for eight years in a row. (California has been last for 
     the same eight years.) The reasons included low taxes and 
     sensible regulations; a high-quality workforce (Texas ranked 
     second only to Utah in that category in 2012); and a pleasant 
     living environment (an eighth-place finish, slightly below 
     sixth-place Florida but, perhaps surprisingly, far better 
     than 28th-place California).
       Part of the explanation for the high living-environment 
     score is doubtless Texas's low cost of living. In 2011, the 
     U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis put Texas's ``regional price 
     parity,'' a measurement of the price level of goods in an 
     area, at 97.1, a bit lower than the national level of 100 and 
     far lower than the California level of 114.8. Adjusted for 
     cost of living, Texas's per-capita income is higher than 
     California's and nearly as high as New York's. Factor in 
     state and local taxes, and Texas pulls ahead of New York.
       More than three-quarters of the cost-of-living difference 
     between Texas and California can be explained by housing 
     costs. Texas mostly dodged the real-estate bubble of the 
     2000s: the affordability of houses in large metro areas 
     spiked in America as a whole but rose only modestly in Texas. 
     A major reason that Texas real estate is so affordable is 
     that the state lacks the draconian land-use restrictions that 
     drive California housing prices into the stratosphere. The 
     affordable housing attracts both people and businesses. Since 
     2000, 1 million more people have moved to Texas from other 
     states than have left.
       All these considerations suggest that Texas is poised for 
     further growth. And a final reason for Texans to be 
     optimistic is that a major expansion of the Panama Canal will 
     be completed in 2014. That could bolster the Lone Star 
     State's success by rerouting Asian commerce from West Coast 
     ports to Texas alternatives, which are closer to the nation's 
     major markets.

  Mr. CORNYN. With that, Madam President, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as in 
morning business.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________