[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 158 (2012), Part 3]
[Senate]
[Pages 3653-3654]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

  Mr. GRAHAM. Mr. President, this is a defining moment for the Senate 
in a couple of ways. The Democratic Senators have an alternative to the 
House-

[[Page 3654]]

passed JOBS bill that will get a vote on their alternative. That is 
good. I believe the House-passed JOBS bill had overwhelming bipartisan 
support. It is a good document. I will support that version over my 
Senate Democratic colleagues. But let me tell you what our Senate 
Democratic colleagues have done that I think is very constructive.
  Ex-Im Bank is trying to be made part of the JOBS bill in the Senate. 
This Export-Import Bank, what does this mean? This is a financing 
ability by American companies that are selling overseas in volatile or 
emerging markets. It is a financing system that has been available 
since 1934. If you are going to try to sell a product made in America 
to a place in the world where traditional banking is hard to obtain, 
you can go to the Ex-Im Bank and they will give a letter of credit, 
they will sometimes give a direct loan to people who want to buy 
American products. The bank itself made $3.5 billion for the taxpayer I 
think since 2005 and 2006.
  Here is the reality: Every country we compete with has their version 
of Ex-Im Bank. We financed $32 billion worth of American-made products 
sold overseas through our Ex-Im system last year. Canada, one-tenth our 
size, financed $100 billion. France has three Ex-Im Banks. China has 
more Ex-Im activity than the United States, France, and Germany 
combined. Every country American manufacturing competes with that 
produces products has their version of Ex-Im Bank.
  At the end of May, our Ex-Im Bank's authorization runs out. Our loan 
limits run out a few weeks earlier. This would be devastating. Small 
companies throughout this country depend on the Ex-Im Bank in order to 
sell American-made products overseas.
  Let me give you one good example that has been the topic of 
conversation. Boeing Aircraft makes airplanes in America, the 787 
Dreamliner. It was voted the best new airplane in a long time here 
recently, something that Boeing is proud of. They make it in Washington 
and now in South Carolina. The first airplane to be made in South 
Carolina will roll out in about a month from now. The facility is under 
budget and ahead of schedule, and we are proud of that airplane.
  Eight out of the 10 airplanes being made in South Carolina in the 
first year were Ex-Im financed. There was a deal between Boeing and Air 
India where a letter of credit was issued by Ex-Im Bank to allow 
traditional financing to occur, and Boeing was able to sell a big order 
of American-made jets to Air India. That is just one example.
  GE makes gas turbines to generate power for emerging areas such as 
Afghanistan, Iraq, the Middle East, Africa. All these distressed areas 
are going to grow and they are going to need power. One-third of the 
sales coming out of Greenville, SC, for the gas turbines made in 
America and creating American jobs goes through Ex-Im financing.
  Here is the issue. If America allows our Ex-Im financing system to go 
away in May, if that is the will of the Congress, then you have 
destroyed the ability of many companies in this country to grow their 
business. As the economy has been weak and stagnant here at home, here 
is the good news: In terms of exports, we have increased our export 
sales 20 percent.
  Imagine an America that could not continue to increase export sales. 
Imagine a Boeing manufacturer that could never sell an American-made 
airplane in a volatile or emerging market because China is now making 
airplanes and Airbus has access to three or four Ex-Im Banks. It would 
be an ill-conceived idea. This program has been around a long time. It 
has helped create thousands of jobs in the United States. Everybody we 
compete with has a more aggressive form of Ex-Im financing than we do.
  To my colleagues who want to eliminate this, I don't understand how 
American business could ever successfully compete in these emerging 
markets if we unilaterally disarm.
  To my Democratic colleagues, thank you for bringing up Ex-Im Bank. To 
our majority leader, Senator Reid, this is a good idea. What is a bad 
idea is to not let anybody on the Republican side offer one amendment 
to this bill. Some of the ideas to reform Ex-Im Bank I would agree to. 
I think any organization, any entity, can be made better. I want to be 
able to get back to being in a body called the United States Senate, 
where people with different ideas on important topics can actually 
vote.
  To my colleagues on this side, I may vigorously oppose some of you 
who decide the Export-Import Bank should go away because I think that 
would be the worst thing you could do for the American economy, 
particularly export jobs being created in this country, and it would be 
unilaterally surrendering in the world marketplace. Whether you like it 
or not, other countries are Export-Import Bank on steroids. If we just 
get out of this business, companies like Boeing will be unable to sell 
their airplanes, and you will shut down facilities such as those in 
South Carolina--not a very good idea.
  At the end of the day, you do have a right to have your say, and we 
will have the debate and I am looking forward to the debate about what 
we should or should not do. But under the process we have now, not one 
amendment can be offered on our side. We have to do better. We had a 
transportation bill pass with 74 votes. We have had a good exchange 
here lately with judges. I am very proud of what our minority and 
majority leader worked out on judges.
  I want to get the Senate back to being the Senate. I think Ex-Im 
reauthorization should be an integral part of any jobs bill. I want to 
put it in the Senate bill. I will gladly vote for it. There are a bunch 
of Republicans over here who will support extension of Ex-Im financing 
with reforms, but none of us want to be put in a situation where our 
colleagues cannot have a say where they disagree with us or that we 
cannot reform the bill. That is not the way to go.
  I hope that between now and 4 o'clock, the minority leader and the 
majority leader can find a way to bring up the JOBS bill, allowing it 
to be amended in an appropriate way and taking votes some of us don't 
like, but it is part of democracy--have a robust debate on a jobs 
package that could not come at a better time, and include in that 
debate Ex-Im reauthorization at a time when America needs more jobs 
here at home.
  The economy here at home is weak. The one good thing about what is 
happening here at home is that our export sales have gone up. The way 
to create export jobs in America is to allow American businesses to 
compete on a level playing field throughout the world. I wish the world 
were different. I wish we had completely free markets. Every American 
business could do fine in that world, but that is not the way it is.
  The Ex-Im Bank doesn't cost the taxpayers one dime. It makes money 
for the Treasury, and it allows American companies to make money. It 
allows American businesses to be competitive.
  I am urging the two leaders of the Senate to allow a jobs bill to 
come forward, let us have our say, have our differences, let's vote, 
let's amend, and let's create jobs in America.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________