[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 158 (2012), Part 2]
[House]
[Pages 2066-2067]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                         PAYROLL TAX DECEPTION

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Canseco). Under the Speaker's announced 
policy of January 5, 2011, the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Brooks) is 
recognized for the remainder of the hour, 15 minutes, as the designee 
of the majority leader.
  Mr. BROOKS. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  In the House today, H.R. 3630, the so-called ``payroll tax holiday,'' 
passed. Later it passed the United States Senate, meaning it passed the 
United States Congress. But on the House floor today, I joined 91 other 
Republican budget hawks, each of whom shares my concern for the 
financial stability of our Nation and a risk of a Federal Government 
insolvency and bankruptcy. Each of us budget hawks voted ``no.''
  In December of 2011, Alabama Senators Richard Shelby and Jeff 
Sessions and I voted ``no'' on the deceptively named payroll tax bill. 
I am pleased today that I was part of a united Republican delegation 
from the State of Alabama to vote ``no'' on H.R. 3630.
  Robert Aderholt, Republican from Haleyville, voted ``no.'' Spencer 
Bachus, Republican from Birmingham, voted ``no.'' Mike Rogers, 
Republican from Anniston, voted ``no.'' Martha Roby, Republican from 
Montgomery, voted ``no.'' And Jo Bonner, Republican from Mobile, voted 
``no.''
  On the Senate side, Alabama Senator Richard Shelby voted ``no,'' and 
Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions voted ``no.'' Each of these individual 
Congressmen and Senators voted ``no,'' again because they share a deep-
rooted concern for the financial stability of our country and the 
impact this legislation can have on that.
  In sum, I voted against H.R. 3630 for a variety of reasons, but I'm 
going to mention three. First, H.R. 3630 disproportionately targets and 
burdens American Federal workers, takes their hard-earned money and 
diverts it to those who don't work for it. That's not fair, and that's 
not good policy.
  Second, America's seniors have asked me to protect Social Security 
and Medicare benefits because they paid for and earned them during 
their working lifetimes. Americans support Social Security because 
everyone contributes their fair share to their own Social Security 
retirement benefits. Social Security is not welfare. Social Security is 
an earned entitlement.
  H.R. 3630 undermines Social Security's and Medicare's foundation by 
threatening 10 percent funding cuts totaling $120 billion per year, 
which will, if continued beyond this fiscal year, breach America's 
commitment to our elderly and will force significant Social Security 
and Medicare benefit cuts. We cannot expect the benefits while cutting 
the revenue that provides those benefits.
  Third, and most importantly, the name ``Middle Class Tax Relief,'' 
which is on the title of H.R. 3630, is deceptive and it is false. There 
is no tax cut. Rather, Mr. Speaker, I want the American people to 
understand that it is 100 percent a loan. Let me delve into that a 
little bit deeper. But as I do so, let me mention this: in the private 
sector, if a commercial institution had done what Congress did today, 
it would constitute flagrant violations of truth in advertising, truth 
in lending, and deceptive practice statutes. But as we all know, 
Washington is all too often immune from such constraints. H.R. 3630 is 
false advertising and deceptive because it is not a tax cut. H.R. 3630 
is a loan that risks America's solvency and which the American people 
must pay back with interest.
  In this regard, the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee 
on Taxation reports revealed two troubling aspects of H.R. 3630: first, 
according to the CBO's and JCT's estimates, enacting H.R. 3630 would 
change revenues and direct spending to produce increases in the deficit 
of $101.1 billion in fiscal year 2012--$101.1 billion in fiscal year 
2012--and we are already 4 or 5 months through with this fiscal year. 
So that gives you an idea of what it's like for the remainder.
  Further, H.R. 3630 would direct the Office of Management and Budget 
to exclude the budgetary effects of H.R. 3630 from its scorecard of 
balances under its Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. So what is H.R. 
3630 doing? Well, it's instructing the Office of Management and Budget 
to not count the

[[Page 2067]]

deficit impact of this legislation on its full scorecard of balances.
  In sum, the Congressional Budget Office report confirms that every 
penny of the so-called ``tax cut'' must be paid back with interest. 
Now, where I come from, if you're given money that you have to pay back 
with interest, that is called a loan; and that is exactly what the 
American people will have to do.
  My parents taught me about debt. Debt never rests. Debt is working 
against you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year for however 
many years it takes you to pay it off in full. Too much debt enslaves 
you. Your creditors and your debt become your masters, and you become 
their servant.
  This is what debt does to every American family, and it is doing that 
slowly but surely to America. As you all know, we blew through the $15 
trillion mark in November of 2011, and sometime this year we are going 
to blow by the $16 trillion debt mark. That debt is not free. There is 
no free lunch.
  According to the CBO report, H.R. 3630 racks up debt at the rate of 
over $12 billion per month in FY 2012. Now, if I had a printed copy of 
H.R. 3630--but the speed of this place sometimes does not empower you 
to have that--according to the CBO report, if we were to have printed 
H.R. 3630 on sheets of gold--which we probably should have done because 
it costs American taxpayers roughly $500 million per page in additional 
debt burden and payments--that's the cost of that bill per page.

                              {time}  1300

  Why would Washington do this to America? What is Washington's motive 
for this deception? Why don't we call things what they are? Why don't 
we call a payroll tax a payroll tax rather than a Social Security and 
Medicare funding tax, which is what it really is? The answer is simple: 
poll data, pandering to voters, and the 2012 elections.
  Why does Washington use the phrase ``payroll tax'' rather than what 
so-called ``payroll taxes'' are--Social Security and Medicare funding 
taxes? Because polls show voters don't understand what the payroll tax 
is, but by golly they know what Social Security and Medicare funding 
taxes are. Yet, 100 percent of the so-called ``tax cuts'' in H.R. 3630 
are cuts to Social Security and Medicare funding taxes. In other words, 
Washington politicians use the phrase ``payroll tax'' because they know 
using the more accurate phrase ``Social Security tax'' would cause 
American voters to rise up to protect our Social Security and Medicare 
system.
  Worse yet, H.R. 3630 deceives America's working families into 
believing they are reaping a windfall when in fact they are being 
saddled with a burden, a burden that will hamstring our children, 
grandchildren, and America's future with another layer of heavy, 
taxing, onerous debt. What Washington won't tell the American people is 
that H.R. 3630 is another debt-busting bill that further empowers China 
and other American predators to become our master while enslaving 
America and the American people with generations of oppressive debt 
burden payments.
  Mr. Speaker, America yearns for leadership, leadership that involves 
adult, mature conversations with American voters about the financial 
condition we are in and what H.R. 3630 is really about.
  There are simply too many in Washington who pander to voters in an 
election year for political gain. H.R. 3630, Mr. Speaker, I would 
submit, represents the worst of Washington, not the best, and not what 
the people deserve.
  I cannot speak for other Congressmen, but as for me, today I and 90 
other Republican budget hawks stood strong for America's future. We 
voted to kill H.R. 3630, stop the deception, stop pandering to voters, 
and save America from another mountain of oppressive debt that 
threatens us with insolvency and bankruptcy.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________