[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 158 (2012), Part 1]
[House]
[Pages 877-881]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




          THE PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS: LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 5, 2011, the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Ellison) is 
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the minority leader.
  Mr. ELLISON. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  My name is Keith Ellison, and I am a cochair of the Progressive 
Caucus. The Progressive Caucus, for people just tuning in, Mr. Speaker, 
is a group of Members of Congress who believes that America is a place 
where the idea of liberty and justice for all must prevail.
  It has got to be more than the words that we say in the Pledge of 
Allegiance. It has got to be something we actually live.
  ``Liberty and justice for all,'' that means everyone. That means we 
don't exclude people based on their religion, and we don't demonize 
them because of it. We embrace people in all their racial and ethnic 
diversities. We say that Americans born in America and that those who 
have come here are Americans all the same. Whether you're straight or 
gay or whether you're male or female, we believe in all America--one 
America--indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
  We believe in civil rights. We believe in human rights. We believe in 
the importance of economic opportunity being wedded to social 
inclusion. For the working people every day--Americans of all 
backgrounds--that means, if you work every day and if you work hard, 
you ought to be able to put food on the table for your families.

                              {time}  1840

  You ought to be able to organize in a union on your job. You ought to 
be able to expect a good, decent retirement after a whole life's-long 
work. You ought to be able to expect that you can affordably put your 
kids through school. You ought to be able to expect that we will have a 
strong social safety net if you happen to hit hard times.
  This is the Progressive Caucus, the caucus that believes that it's 
better to talk it out than to shoot it out. Diplomacy is better than 
war. We should try to work out our differences with other nations, and 
saber rattling and investing in warfare armaments and outside and above 
protecting the American people is a problem.
  We should be talking about things like environmental protection. We 
should be protecting our natural world. We should be addressing the 
dangers of

[[Page 878]]

climate change, and we should be affecting that change to make sure 
that America is greener and cleaner and more sustainable.
  That's the Progressive Caucus, Mr. Speaker. We're the ones who could 
be found standing up for the Constitution, standing up for the idea of 
freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of the press. We 
will be found standing up for the idea the government must have the 
proper authorization and justification to violate people's right to be 
left alone.
  We also want to stand up and say that we believe that the progressive 
motion in America is what has made America this great Nation. We 
recognize our wonderful Nation, our great Nation had a dream. From the 
very beginning we had a dream, but we also had a reality. The dream was 
liberty and justice for all, land of the free, home of the brave. The 
dream was that all Americans and all men will be created equal, endowed 
by their creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life, 
liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That was the dream. But the 
reality was America held slaves. The reality was women couldn't vote. 
The reality was the original people were relegated to an inferior 
status.
  So people who believed in that dream, people like Martin Luther King, 
people like Harriet Tubman, people like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and 
people like Susan B. Anthony, people like Eugene Debs, and people like 
Walter Reuther and other great Americans, they believed that that dream 
was worth fighting for and got out there, Mr. Speaker, and made the 
dream reality.
  We weren't trying to conserve the old order and status quo; we were 
trying to progress toward a better America that really reflected that 
dream that I was just talking about. The dream was that all Americans 
are created equal. The reality was segregation.
  But Americans who had a progressive vision said we're not going to 
stay, we're not going to conserve segregation. We're not going to 
conserve robber barons who controlled all the wealth in the 1890s. 
We're not going to conserve the abuse of our environment.
  Rachel Carson said, we're not going to conserve that. We're not 
conservatives. We're trying to make America better. We believe in the 
greatness of this country, and we are not going to stop until we get 
it.
  So people like Rachel Carson said we're going to have a clean 
environment, and she wrote about it and she fought for it. And people 
like Martin Luther King fought for civil rights, and people like Walter 
Reuther fought for the right to organize. And sometimes people who were 
in these movements gave their lives for the changes that they stood 
for, and other times they were able to survive.
  But the fact is they were all united in one progressive vision of 
what America should be about, not trying to preserve racism, slavery, 
segregation, gender oppression. The progressive movement is what we 
stand for, not conservatism. That's not us, we're not them and don't 
want to be confused with them.
  So tonight we're here for a progressive message, and we're going to 
be talking about jobs and unemployment, but I did want to take a 
moment, Mr. Speaker, just to let everybody know who the Progressive 
Caucus was, because we don't want anybody to think that we're something 
else than what we are, the people who embrace the American Dream and 
believe that America is such a great country we can overcome all the 
sins of the past and don't want to conserve any of them.
  Mr. Speaker, we want to go into a few key points tonight. We won't be 
here the whole hour, but we want to be strong while we are. And so 
today we bring the people, Mr. Speaker, the progressive message to 
illustrate what's at stake in America today. What are the things that 
we're competing for? What are we contesting for? We come down, we watch 
the events on the House floor and all across the America, but what is 
the fight all about?
  Working families are getting crushed and our middle class is 
shrinking every day. The working people of America are fighting to 
preserve a quality of life because a set of ideas has prevailed in 
America which basically says that any regulation is bad, and what we 
say is that regulations, if they're protecting life, protecting the 
environment, and they're helping the rules be fair and allowing 
Americans to succeed and have opportunity, they're not bad.
  But there are some people who never saw a regulation that they liked. 
We believe protecting health and safety is a good thing. We believe 
that getting rid of bad regulation or old regulation is just fine, but 
these folks over here have an ideological commitment to any, to ending 
any regulation, and we recognize that this is exactly what has ruined 
our environment, exactly what has caused global climate change, and 
exactly what caused the financial disaster.
  What's at stake in America?
  Here in America some folks believe that if the economy is going 
really, really well, what they need to do is have a tax cut for the 
wealthy. If the economy is doing really, really bad, well, what they 
need is a tax cut.
  If the economy is doing sort of good and sort of bad, what we need is 
a tax cut. In other words, the guys on the other side of the aisle, 
they don't believe in taxes. We in the Progressive Caucus believe that 
you shouldn't tax Americans any more than is necessary, but we believe 
that taxes are the dues that we pay to live in a civilized society.
  We believe that if our taxes go so that there can be Head Start for 
our poor kids to be able to have a chance in life, that's all right. 
That if we have to pay taxes for police officers and firefighters and 
people who work on our roads to make them safe and make sure bridges 
are safe to cross, we're all right with that.
  We're not these folks who believe that you want to cut, slash, and 
burn, and act like public workers and public employees are just, you 
know, not valuable. We recognize they are valuable, and I'm talking 
about people who work in parks and rec, the police, the firefighters, 
but also the people who make sure that our water is clean and our 
environment is safe. Also, people who make sure that our economic and 
financial system is safe, people who make sure that when people, that 
when some folks want to cut corners and just want to make a quick buck, 
that they're not going to be allowed to do that.
  You need a cop on the beat, a financial cop on the beat to make sure 
that good actors are rewarded and bad ones are punished. So people who 
say, oh, we don't want any regulation because it would hurt jobs, we 
don't agree with that. We believe that jobs are going to come when we 
have middle class people having enough money to spend, and then the 
businesses of our country have enough customers so that they can then 
add new people.
  Whereas our friends on the other side of the aisle believe that if 
you give people like Mitt Romney a lot of money, maybe, just maybe, it 
might trickle down to the rest of us. Something might land on our 
heads. Well, something has landed on our heads, but it's not rain or a 
good job; it's hard times economically.
  Trickle-down economics, supply-side economics is a failed policy. It 
never worked. They always want to say Reagan, well, look at Reagan. 
Reagan raised taxes plenty of times, and so they even misappropriate 
his legacy. But the fact is the Progressive Caucus is here to talk 
about what's at stake in America today.
  Now, if you want to know what's really going on, you could just look 
at this week. Here we are in Washington, supposed to be working hard on 
people's business. It's not like a lot of big things aren't going on. 
We've got a payroll tax that's about to expire.
  Did we take that up on the House floor today? No.
  Did we make sure that Americans don't end up with a thousand dollars 
extra to pay over the course of a year as the payroll tax deduction 
goes up? No.
  Oh, this summer student loans are going to go up, are going to double 
if we don't extend the law that would allow them to stay lower. Did we 
work on that? No, didn't touch that. But

[[Page 879]]

here's what we did do. This week in Congress the Republican majority 
didn't bring up a single bill to create jobs, none of that.

                              {time}  1850

  They didn't bring up a single bill to help Americans stay in their 
homes as we are in the midst of this foreclosure crisis that seems to 
never end. They didn't bring up any bills to make sure that our air was 
clean and our water was safe to drink. Nor did they bring up any bills 
to rebuild our country. No, instead, they were busy playing politics 
while people are hurting.
  Yesterday, they brought up a bill to repeal an effort to help seniors 
get health care called the CLASS Act. Now, the CLASS Act was a piece of 
the Affordable Care Act. Some good-faith people working in our 
government said, you know, there are some things that we need to fix 
with this bill before it works the way we want it to.
  Anybody who has ever made anything knows that sometimes that happens. 
Sometimes you've got to mend the thing that you're working on. If 
you've ever cooked a meal, sometimes, you know, you've got to put a 
little more sugar or salt or add a little more water. Legislation is 
exactly the same way. You pass a law, you think it can do certain 
things, but when you get into the actual operation of it, sometimes it 
doesn't work like you thought.
  With this long-term care bill, some good public servants said, you 
know, there are some kinks we've got to work out. But instead of 
working out those kinks, the Republican majority just decided to strip 
the whole thing away. So seniors who need long-term care, the 
Republican majority didn't say, You know what, here's our fix. They 
just said, Get rid of what was already done. We say build on what was 
done. They say strip it away. It's too bad that's the position that 
they took, but that's the position they took.
  Let me tell a few things about long-term care and why we need to 
strengthen long-term care and not strip away what's already been 
passed. We have a long-term crisis in the United States today that the 
Republicans, who are in the majority in the House, are not dealing 
with.
  Do you know, 10 million Americans, Mr. Speaker, need long-term care. 
Over the next decade, another 5 million Americans will require this 
care, bringing the total to about 15 million people, Mr. Speaker. The 
problem is only getting worse, and we've got to do something about it. 
I wish my friends on the Republican side would help us. But even though 
they are in the majority, they're not.
  Nearly 70 percent of all people will need some level of long-term 
care after turning 65 years old, Mr. Speaker. That means anybody lucky 
enough to get to 65, there is approximately a seven in 10 chance you're 
going to need some long-term care assistance. The number of Americans 
62 years and older is 20 percent higher than 10 years ago, so America 
is aging. And you know what, this is a good sign. We want Americans to 
be healthy. We want our seniors to be healthy, and we want them to be 
strong. And when they get into a health crisis, we want them to have 
the care that they need.
  And, Mr. Speaker, it's also important to point out here that about 62 
million unpaid family caregivers, about 62 million unpaid family 
caregivers, that's adult children of seniors, about 62 million of these 
families provide care which, if you put a dollar figure on it, would 
amount to $450 billion in 2009, more than the total spending on 
Medicare that year. So families are stepping up, but families need a 
little help. I can tell you, Mr. Speaker, people are coming into my 
office every day. People my age, I'm 48, and they say, My mom is 
getting older. She needs help. Or she got sick, something's going on. 
We need a fix for the long-term care.
  And so, Mr. Speaker, with all of these problems that we're facing, 
with 70 percent of people who will need some level of long-term care by 
the time they turn 65, with the number of Americans 62 years of age and 
older being 20 percent higher than 10 years ago, with all of these 
issues, Mr. Speaker, you would think that the Republican majority would 
step up and do something about it. They're in the majority.
  But what has been their response? An attempt to score political 
points, not solutions. They haven't come with any solution. They 
haven't come with a proposal to fix long-term care. They just want to 
strip what President Obama and the Democratic majority did, and I think 
that's too bad.
  Now, that was what we did yesterday. We messed around. They tried to 
embarrass the President. It didn't work because Americans know that 
President Obama cares. In fact, I think Republicans know it, that's why 
they call it ObamaCare. Well, he does care, so they can say whatever 
they want.
  But my point is today they were back up to their old tricks. Today, 
we in Congress voted on a budget gimmick bill--that's all you can 
really call it--a bill to make it easier for Republicans to pass more 
tax giveaways to the top 1 percent. They call it the Pro-Growth 
Budgeting Act. And, Mr. Speaker, if I had a dime for every deceptively 
named piece of legislation during this 112th Congress, I think I'd be a 
wealthy man right now.
  This legislation would rig the rules, play games with the rules, 
funny accounting, Mr. Speaker, to make it easier for the GOP budget 
priorities to pass, like the Ryan budget, which included deficit-
busting tax cuts for the wealthy and cuts in job-creating investments 
like education, estimated to cost about 1.7 million jobs by 2014.
  This bill, this funny-math bill, this bill requires the Congressional 
Budget Office to use what they call dynamic scoring--that's the word 
they like to use--as part of a macroeconomic impact analysis of tax 
provisions. That's a whole lot of long words, Mr. Speaker, which 
basically says that they want to score it in a way that makes them look 
good. That's what they're trying to do. And what they want to do is 
include calculating their effect on the economy like GDP--that's all of 
the goods and services in a year domestically, investments and 
employment--which past budget analysts have said are really not going 
to be an accurate reflection of what's going on when preparing 
supplemental cost estimates for major legislation.
  Such an analysis is designed to hide the impact of tax cuts on the 
budget deficit, making tax cuts easier to enact or extending by masking 
their true costs. This bill, this funny-math bill, injects supply-side 
economics into the Congressional Budget Office scoring, which has been 
discredited time and time again. It has no place in the nonpartisan 
analysis provided to Congress. You see, Mr. Speaker, the CBO was set up 
so that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats, the conservatives or 
the progressives, none of us with our points of view could get in and 
mess around with the way the Congressional Budget Office scored a bill.
  What it means to score a bill, Mr. Speaker, is to analyze the costs 
of the bill, or analyze the financial impact of the bill. So it might 
be how much taxes is this going to generate. The CBO, the Congressional 
Budget Office, would give us an estimate. Or how much is this program 
going to cost. The CBO tells us what are the budgetary implications of 
what we're doing. Historically, Republicans and Democrats have just had 
to live with the CBO score because it's a nonpartisan office, meaning 
neither party controls it. But now what the Republicans want to do is 
come up with this dynamic scoring thing to make their estimates look 
better. This is wrong. They shouldn't do it. They shouldn't do it.
  The underlying assumption behind the bill is that tax cuts pay for 
themselves. This is obviously wrong. The reason we are in this 
monumental debt and deficit situation that Republicans like to talk 
about, they're always going on about we're leaving debt on our children 
and grandchildren. They always say it like that in a real dramatic way, 
Mr. Speaker.
  The reason we're in this mess is because we got two unpaid-for wars 
under a Republican administration and huge tax cuts under a Republican 
administration. They cut taxes during a war. When you're really 
supposed to be raising taxes to pay for the war, they cut taxes during 
the war which exploded all this debt. That's the truth. If they

[[Page 880]]

come down here and tell you the truth, that's what they would say. That 
two unpaid-for wars and the Bush tax cuts are what exploded the debt 
and the deficit. It's why we're in the situation that we're in.
  They always want to say, oh, ObamaCare. That's not the cause of it. 
They want to say, oh, oh, the stimulus. That's not the cause of it 
because that was an expenditure in a short period of time that didn't 
have long, long tails like these tax cuts do or these wars.

                              {time}  1900

  That's what has exploded the deficit. And now, instead of owning up 
to it and saying we need to tax Americans more fairly, not just take 
care of the rich people, but take care of everybody and make sure the 
burden is shared and not just the rich get to escape with not doing 
anything, or not doing much. Some folks running for President are worth 
hundreds of millions of dollars and only pay 13.9 percent on it; 
whereas if you make 50,000, 60,000, you're going to pay 25 percent, 28 
percent or 35 percent, depending on exactly how much you make. It's 
unfair. What the Republicans want to do is instead of just owning up 
and saying, yeah, we were fiscally irresponsible, they just want to 
have dynamic scoring so it doesn't look so obvious.
  Now, I talked about what we did yesterday, which is try to do nothing 
about long-term care except embarrass the President and strip the CLASS 
Act out. Today, we played games with the budget again with budget-
counting measures trying to interfere with how the nonpartisan 
Congressional Budget Office does the scoring. Well, what are we going 
to do tomorrow, Mr. Speaker? Certainly, tomorrow must be better than 
the last 2 days, particularly given the fact that we got the payroll 
tax deduction running out and other things, important things, going on. 
Are we going to take up the payroll tax deduction issue tomorrow? No.
  Tomorrow, we're going to do something else, another budgeting gimmick 
bill, this time called the Baseline Reform Act. This is another one to 
try to hide the reality. It requires the Congressional Budget Office--
and, Mr. Speaker, you'll recall I explained that Congressional Budget 
Office is sometimes referred to as the CBO--it requires the CBO to 
unrealistically assume in its baseline that spending in the future will 
stay the same and not grow to keep pace with inflation, thereby 
facilitating cuts in real terms in job-creating investments.
  This bill ignores the impact of inflation on the discretionary budget 
which gives an unrealistic picture of what it will take to maintain 
basic services. So, understand it this way, Mr. Speaker, if inflation 
is making everything cost more but you try to hold the line, then the 
cost of things will not be accurately reflected if you don't account 
for inflation. But this is exactly what they don't want to do.
  Republicans want to starve these programs, and they could lead to 
long backlogs for services and other types of problems such as the 
major issues at the Walter Reed Hospital during the last decade. 
Relative to the traditional baseline, a freeze would reduce investment 
for long-range programs such as rebuilding and educating America by 
over 20 percent and by the 10th year.
  So there you have it, Mr. Speaker. Three days of not dealing with 
what we need to deal with, 3 days of playing games, 3 days of not 
dealing with the people's business, 3 days of not focusing on what 
America needs us to focus on.
  So, Mr. Speaker, let's talk about the American people. They have 
rejected the Republican budget scheme that ends the Medicare guarantee 
to pay for tax breaks for Big Oil millionaires and corporations that 
ship jobs overseas. For the last year, if you're not a CEO or a wealthy 
special interest, the Republican Party of the 1 percent says you're on 
your own. I often wonder what they meant when they said the ``ownership 
society.'' What they really mean is the ``you're on your own society.'' 
They mean, hey, we got to cut cities and towns, and we got to cut 
States, and we can't be there for you anymore. You are on your own. 
We're going to lay off teachers, we're going to not give the cities 
enough to make sure there's enough police, water, fire, all that stuff. 
You're on your own.
  But Mitt Romney is not on his own. If you need a bailout, you're not 
on your own. But if your house is underwater, don't look to the 
majority for help. If you're a father who lost your job through no 
fault of your own, a mother struggling to make ends meet, or a family 
kicked out of your home, the majority of the 1 percent says you're on 
your own. Turning their backs on ordinary Americans may pad the profits 
of corporate donors and hedge funds of billionaires bankrolling their 
campaigns, but it won't grow the middle class.
  It used to be that working hard and playing by the rules meant you 
got a fair shot. We've got to restore that dream. We're not talking 
about an American fantasy where everybody is--you see it on TV 
sometimes, Mr. Speaker, where you're going to be living in some lavish 
place and fancy this and fancy that and lifestyles of the rich and 
famous and all this kind of stuff. We're not talking about an American 
fantasy. We're talking about an American Dream, which is realistic 
because it's not too much to ask that if you're willing to work hard in 
this country that this country should work for you.
  But many Americans out there are under a lot of stress, and it's 
because from a policy standpoint, their elected leadership is catering 
to the people who have the most under the philosophy, Mr. Speaker, that 
if you give it all to the rich, they will invest in plants and 
equipment, and then it will trickle down to everybody else. That 
philosophy has failed, and it's time for them to admit it.
  We need leaders who understand that when we all do better, we all do 
better. Americans have got to have a better shake. And we in the 
Progressive Caucus are standing up for hardworking taxpayers of the 
great American middle class and working class and poor. We in the 
Progressive Caucus are not ashamed to stand up for the poor, Mr. 
Speaker. We believe that poor people, low-income people, what you call 
poor people, are poor if they're too old to work or too sick to work or 
too young to work. Anyone else might be poor by circumstance, but they 
would love to join that great American middle class if they could just 
get a chance. And that means an education, that means job retraining, 
and that means an economy where we're literally trying to do something 
to protect the American worker from off-shoring by investing in our 
infrastructure, putting people back to work, and by doing things to 
make this economy strong.
  The best way to get our economy going is to put America back to work. 
There's a lot of work to be done. The best way to cut spending is to 
cut spending on tax handouts to millionaires, billionaires, and 
corporate special interests, while we give $4 billion to the oil 
industry while they're making the most money they ever made, and they 
still come down here and scream, oh, don't take away our subsidies.
  The American people know that the best way to cut spending is to cut 
spending on big special interests like Wall Street and Big Oil. But 
instead, Republicans would rather make the rest of us pay for tax 
giveaways for millionaires and Republican corporate donors like big oil 
and pharmaceutical companies.
  So we want an America where the burdens are shared and where the 
benefits are also shared. We want an America where there is true 
economic opportunity and inclusion. We want an America where it doesn't 
matter whether if you're born here or you came here, it doesn't matter 
what color you are, it doesn't matter what religion you are, it doesn't 
matter whether you're male or female or who you want to be married to, 
that all of us can have a good, prosperous life based on an economy 
that works for everybody.
  And so I just want to say, Mr. Speaker, as I begin to wind up my 
remarks, that this Progressive Caucus is going to be here standing up 
for the American people. We will be there for the 99

[[Page 881]]

percent. We will work to get money out of politics, as we're pushing 
constitutional amendments to do so. We will stand up to Citizens 
United. We believe that corporations are not people, money is not 
speech. And in America, democracy is not for sale.
  We believe unemployment insurance should be there for people who have 
fallen on hard times. And we believe that the social safety net is 
something that's important so that when people need help, they can get 
back up on their feet.
  Mr. Speaker, as I wind down, I just want to point out that, with 
nearly 14 million people unemployed today, they deserve an opportunity 
in an America that really works for them. They deserve leaders who care 
about their plight. They need leaders who care about their plight and 
are willing to stand up and push policy that will make the American 
Dream attainable for anybody who wants to work for it.
  I just want to say, as I close out, America is a wonderful idea. And 
the American Dream should be in the grasp of every American. And great 
Americans have overcome some of the bad things in the past as they 
reached out to build the American Dream for all.
  And when I say liberty and justice for all, Mr. Speaker, I mean it. 
And I just don't mean social equality, I mean economic opportunity too. 
And it's going to have to start with asking everybody to pay their fair 
share, recognizing that trickle down never worked and never will, and 
that we've got to invest in America, educate America, and protect 
America so we can get this economy working again.
  With that, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________