[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 158 (2012), Part 1]
[Senate]
[Pages 152-154]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                               THE BUDGET

  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I wish to observe that tomorrow night the 
President of the United States will make his annual State of the Union 
Address to Congress. This signals, of course, the beginning of the 
annual budget and appropriations process. But what has not happened for 
too long is the Senate passing a budget for the Federal Government. In 
fact, tomorrow, the same day the President will

[[Page 153]]

speak to the Nation, it will be the 1,000th day since the budget was 
passed by the Senate. That day was April 29, 2009. As the facts would 
reveal, it is our Democratic friends, led by the majority leader, 
Senator Reid, who have resisted bringing a budget to the floor for 
amendment and debate and a vote.
  I believe with all my heart that is one of the reasons why the 
American people hold the Congress in such low regard. It is because we 
have failed in our most basic responsibilities, now for more than 1,000 
days. None of us can imagine a family or small business operating 
without a budget. It is unthinkable. I suspect there are not many, if 
any, small businesses that do not sit down and do the hard work of 
working out a budget. A budget, after all, is a matter of priorities. 
As the distinguished occupant of the chair knows as a former Governor, 
there is no way a State, a city, a county, a small business, or a 
family can get by without a budget because it is the discipline that 
comes with a budget where you decide what is absolutely essential, you 
decide what you want to have that you maybe could put off for another 
day, and it forces you to reach the conclusion in some instances that 
things you would like to do are simply unaffordable. Unfortunately, the 
majority leader has simply resisted those hard decisions. That is 
regrettable.
  As a member of the Budget Committee, I was especially disappointed 
that the Budget Committee, the very purpose of which is to debate and 
pass a budget, did not debate one this last year. The majority leader, 
when asked about this in the press, said that it would be foolish for 
the majority to produce a budget. I suspect he wanted to protect his 
Democratic Members from some tough votes and tough decisions. But that 
is what we were sent here for, to make hard but important decisions on 
behalf of our constituents and the American people, even if they are 
tough votes and even if they are unpopular decisions. That is our 
responsibility. But under the leadership of Senator Reid the Senate has 
completely abdicated that responsibility for now 1,000 days.
  Nothing could be more foolish or foolhardy than refusing to provide 
the Nation's job creators, investors, and, yes, the taxpayers, with a 
blueprint for our fiscal future. How is it that the majority can 
continue to shrink from the most basic responsibilities of governing? I 
am amazed sometimes. People say they want to serve in public office. 
They like the prestige, perhaps, the visibility, the power that goes 
along with it. Yet when it comes to actually discharging their 
responsibilities and making tough decisions, they may say, no, I don't 
want to make anybody mad.
  But that is what we were sent here for. It is our responsibility. It 
is plain fact that the American people cannot afford to have this body 
continue paying just lip service to fiscal sanity while seeing our 
fiscal ship so off keel.
  It should come as no surprise that during this period of time we have 
not had a budget for the Federal Government, the Nation has spent $9.4 
trillion. And $4.1 trillion has been added to the national debt, if you 
account for the fact that the President recently asked for another $1.2 
trillion in additional borrowing authority. The national debt has grown 
to more than $15 trillion and is now larger than the whole U.S. 
economy, our gross domestic product. Government spending has reached a 
post-World War II record and now makes up 25 percent of the economy. 
That is just government spending alone. The average has been somewhere 
around 20 percent of our gross domestic product. Now it is up to about 
25 percent.
  Unfortunately, because the economy is so depressed, revenues are 
around 15 percent, hence a 10-percent annual budget deficit which, as 
it accumulates, adds to our national debt.
  As we all know, our Nation has lost its triple-A credit rating from 
Standard & Poor's, casting further doubt about the solvency of the U.S. 
Government and our commitment to pay our debts. All three major rating 
agencies have assigned a negative outlook, something short of a 
downgrade, but they have issued a warning to those who lend money to 
the U.S. Government that they have a negative outlook on the Nation's 
long-term rating. This is a signal too that future downgrades are more 
likely in the near future. You know what happens when the rating 
agencies downgrade our debt; it is more expensive for the Federal 
Government to borrow money.
  Indeed, I have read that over a 10-year period of time, a 1-percent 
increase in the cost of paying China or somebody to buy our debt, in 
terms of a return on that investment, a 1-percent increase over 10 
years is roughly $1.3 trillion. So even if we were to cut $1.3 
trillion, suffering a 1.3-percent increase in the cost of persuading 
somebody to buy our debt would negate and wipe out any savings by a 
cut.
  I fear the failure to pass a budget is simply a recipe for more debt 
and more out-of-control spending. While the majority has abdicated its 
responsibility to pass a budget, as required by law, and even refused 
to bring it to the floor, the House has acted responsibly and has 
passed its own budget. But instead of offering their own blueprint in 
the Senate, the majority leader and the majority party have simply 
demagogued the House budget.
  We have seen that from the President of the United States. 
Ultimately, Senator Reid brought the House budget up for a vote on the 
floor, knowing it would fail because it actually reduced spending, it 
continued much-needed tax relief, and it put the Government on a diet, 
something the Federal Government sorely needs.
  The Senate also had an opportunity to finally vote on the budget 
submitted by the President last year. This was something that was 
prompted by action of Senator McConnell, the Republican leader, because 
our friends across the aisle did not, apparently, even want to vote on 
the President's proposed budget. But while there was support for the 
House budget, not one Senator on either side of the aisle supported the 
President's budget. It went down 97 to 0, which was quite a remarkable 
vote. Even my colleagues on the other side of the aisle realized that 
the budget submitted by the President was an irresponsible budget, one 
that would increase taxes, increase spending, and increase debt.
  We know that higher debt leads to slower economic growth. Economic 
studies have shown that high levels of government debt inhibit economic 
growth by creating economic uncertainty about the economy, about tax 
increases, and it actually crowds out or displaces investment in the 
private sector. Slower economic growth means fewer jobs. According to 
Christina Romer, former chair of the White House Council of Economic 
Advisers, a 1-percent change in gross domestic product growth is 
equivalent to 1 million jobs a year.
  I would recall, back during the time the administration proposed its 
stimulus to try to get the economy moving again--$787 billion plus 
interest, roughly $1 trillion--they projected growth of the economy 
during 2011-2012 to be roughly 4.3 percent of gross domestic product, a 
4.3-percent growth. Unfortunately, in the third quarter of 2010, which 
is the last quarter for which some numbers are available, the economy 
grew at a rate of 1.8 percent--not 4.3 percent but 1.8 percent.
  So the warning sound has clearly been heard. The fiscal tsunami that 
many budget experts predicted could suddenly arise is fast approaching. 
It is a challenge that faces the country today, not tomorrow, and we 
need solutions today. But it takes leadership and it takes courage. All 
we have to do is look across the Atlantic Ocean and watch what many of 
our European friends are going through today to see what happens when 
government spending and debt are allowed to grow unchecked. When 
governments and nations live beyond their means and continue to rack up 
debt, passing it on to their children and grandchildren, at some point 
the creditors of that nation, the holders of that sovereign debt, lose 
confidence in the ability of those nations to actually pay it back and 
we see the kind of sovereign debt crisis like we are seeing in Europe 
today.

[[Page 154]]

  All of these challenges require Presidential leadership, but I am 
confident we will not hear the President talking about these issues 
tomorrow. The President has had multiple opportunities to embrace 
bipartisan fiscal overhaul plans such as the one produced by his own 
bipartisan debt commission, the Simpson-Bowles commission. 
Unfortunately, the President has chosen to ignore the work of his own 
debt commission.
  Over the past 2 years we have also noted an explosion in the number 
of Federal regulations which have further created uncertainty in the 
economy and caused the entrepreneurs and job creators to sit on the 
sidelines not knowing what the cost is going to be of their doing 
business, whether their business model will actually work or whether in 
addition to taxes, regulation, and the cost of health care they can 
actually break even, much less make a profit. Well, it is no 
coincidence because of the higher debt, runaway regulations, and the 
threat of higher taxes that we have experienced the weakest economic 
recovery since World War II, leaving millions of Americans without 
jobs.
  My constituents--all 25 million of them in Texas--and everyone in 
America deserve better, and they are telling us in unequivocal terms 
that they think the country is on the wrong track. How could they 
possibly believe otherwise? When my constituents know Washington 
borrows 40 cents out of every dollar it spends and knows the national 
debt is a job-killing economic liability for the country, how would 
they say the country is on the right track when clearly it is not. 
Every man, woman, and child in my State and across the country is 
roughly $49,000 in debt, and that has increased by almost 40 percent 
since President Obama took office in 2009.
  The unemployment rate in Texas, while, thankfully, is lower than the 
national rate, consistently remains above what it was since the last 
time the Senate passed a budget. The unemployment rate in Texas is 20 
percent higher than it was when the administration told Texans that its 
stimulus plan would make sure the national rate would not go above 8 
percent.
  Well, if we go back and look at the projections--they said it would 
not go above 8 percent, and by the first quarter in 2012 it would be 6 
percent--clearly, they were off the mark, and the stimulus failed to 
meet the administration's own stated goals.
  My constituents also believe, with some justification, the national 
debt is a national security risk. ADM Mike Mullen, former Chairman of 
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the debt is the single biggest threat 
to our national security. It struck me as unusual to hear the Chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff saying it is our financial condition that 
is our national security threat. But when we think about it, if America 
cannot pay its debt back, if we experience a sovereign debt crisis, if 
the interest demanded by our creditors goes through the roof--as we 
have seen for Italian bonds and other bonds over in Europe--it means we 
will not have the money to pay not only for the safety net programs 
that are important for the most vulnerable of Americans and keep our 
commitments for Social Security and Medicare, it means we will not be 
able to protect the national security of the United States, which is 
the No. 1 responsibility of the Federal Government.
  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said the debt ``undermines our 
capacity to act in our own interest . . . and it also sends a message 
of weakness internationally.''
  My constituents know that successful debt reduction measures must 
rely on spending cuts, not tax increases, and that economic growth is 
one of the main goals. Right now, if we don't act before the end of the 
year, due to expiring tax provisions we will see the single highest tax 
bill in American history, almost $5 trillion more by some estimates.
  For example, the State and local sales tax deduction--my State 
doesn't have an income tax, and income taxes are deductible under 
Federal tax law, but State sales taxes are not right now but for the 
provision that will expire by the end of the year. This is an important 
issue to my constituents and a matter of fundamental fairness.
  In 2009, 2.1 million taxpayers in Texas claimed almost $4 billion in 
deductions. According to tax comptroller Susan Combs, extending the 
sales tax deduction will benefit millions of Texans who are working 
hard to keep our Nation's economy vibrant.
  I am proud my State has been a beacon from the economic standpoint of 
opportunity where people have voted with their feet, and they have 
moved from places where they don't have jobs and don't have 
opportunities to Texas where they do. It is no coincidence that as a 
result of the most recent reapportionment, Texas got four new 
congressional seats. This is primarily due to people moving to where 
the opportunity is. It makes perfect sense.
  Why would we want to do anything that would threaten the economy of 
Texas or any other State of the Union? We know the President will give 
another speech to the American people tomorrow night, and he will send 
his budget--as required by law--to Congress early next month. At this 
time, the American people will be able to see for themselves if we have 
a leader who possesses the audacity to bring us together to right the 
ship or one who will lead us down a path that has brought the economies 
of Europe to the brink of economic disaster and a permanent lower 
standard of life.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Minnesota.
  Ms. KLOBUCHAR. Mr. President, I ask to speak as if in morning 
business for 2 minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________