[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 158 (2012), Part 1]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 1029-1030]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




  INTRODUCTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SPECIAL ELECTION REFORM ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON

                      of the district of columbia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Monday, February 6, 2012

  Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the District of Columbia 
Special Election Reform Act. I introduced similar legislation last 
Congress, which passed without objection by the House Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform and the full House. Final enactment of 
the bill was prevented, however, by an anonymous hold in the Senate, 
which is no longer allowed in that Chamber. This bill is of great 
importance to the District of Columbia, particularly now as the 
District of Columbia Council is faced with the sort of vacancy that 
this bill is meant to address. The District has to hold a special 
election just one month after the primary election, which will cost the 
city an estimated $318,000. Although this bill will not take effect 
before the upcoming special election, the bill will provide the 
District with the flexibility in the future to conduct fair elections 
without such redundancies and unnecessary costs. The District of 
Columbia Special Election Reform Act is of little concern to Congress, 
but the D.C. Council cannot amend the Home Rule Charter. All of the 
provisions in the bill have been passed or approved by the District of 
Columbia.
  The District of Columbia Special Election Reform Act makes minor 
changes to the District's Home Rule Charter to provide the city greater 
flexibility to conduct special elections for vacancies in the office of 
mayor, attorney general, Council chairman and other members of the 
District of Columbia Council. Current law requires that a special 
election be held on the first Tuesday occurring more than 114 days 
after a vacancy. The bill would establish

[[Page 1030]]

a range during which a special election may be conducted, between 70 
and 174 days, to reduce the gap in local representation, while also 
allowing the Board of Elections to take into account important factors 
when scheduling a special election, such as maximizing voter 
participation and avoiding conflicts with religious and culture 
observances.
  I very much appreciate the opportunity to work closely with the House 
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa to 
develop this bill, and look forward to the bill being signed into law.

                          ____________________