[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 157 (2011), Part 4]
[House]
[Pages 5271-5272]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




               ONE-WEEK CONTINUING RESOLUTION/2012 BUDGET

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
Maryland (Mr. Hoyer) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. HOYER. Madam Speaker, budgets are not simply about dollars and 
cents. They are about values and priorities. And the debate over 
spending has revealed Republican priorities, in my opinion, in the 
worst possible light.
  First, Republicans passed a spending plan for the remainder of the 
fiscal year that would cripple America's ability to out-innovate, out-
educate, and out-build its competitors. That spending plan would cut 
billions in medical and energy research, cut out support for 20,000 
research scientists, kick 200,000 children out of Head Start, put 
college out of reach for millions of middle class students, and end 
vital infrastructure projects in 40 States, infrastructure projects 
which provide American jobs.
  A consensus of nonpartisan economists has found that the plan will 
cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. And Mark Zandi, Moody's 
Analytics chief economist and an adviser to Senator McCain's 
Presidential campaign, said that it would cost almost 700,000 jobs.
  In addition to these skewed priorities, Republicans are insisting 
that any bill, any bill to keep the government open must also include 
controversial social policy provisions that have little, if anything, 
to do with the deficit, even though their own Pledge to America 
promised to ``end the practice of packaging unpopular bills with 'must-
pass' legislation,'' bills that should pass on their merits, not as 
related to some extraneous issue.
  Rather than compromise with President Obama, with the Democrats in 
the Senate and the House, Republicans are threatening, once again, to 
shut down government as they did in 1995.
  Now they tell us that they will back off on their threat but only if 
we pass a partisan, 1-week spending bill that triples the ransom to 
keep the government open. In other words, this bill contains three 
times the weekly cuts as the last week-to-week bill did. It also takes 
all cuts from only a small slice of the budget.
  Frankly, Madam Speaker, that makes this latest bill a mockery of 
fiscal responsibility, especially because it leaves entirely untouched 
for the rest of the year what the Secretary of Defense himself has 
called the Pentagon's ``culture of endless money.'' This partisan patch 
contradicts Republicans' own promises to put everything on the table, 
defense spending included.
  Listen to their own words, as reported by the Associated Press on 
January 23: ``The House's new majority leader, Representative Eric 
Cantor of Virginia, has said defense programs could join others on the 
cutting board.'' But, of course, they haven't done that.
  New York Times, January 27: ``Representative Chris Gibson, a tea 
party-endorsed freshman Republican and retired Army colonel, made it 
clear that no part of the Pentagon's $550 billion budget, some $700 
billion including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, was immune. `This 
deficit that we have threatens our very way of life, and everything 
needs to be on the table.''' However, they have not done that.
  Congressman Mike Pence, on January 7, said: ``If we are going to put 
our fiscal house in order, we have to be able to look at defense.'' We 
need a strong defense. I am a supporter of a strong defense. But to 
take those dollars off the table is irresponsible and inconsistent with 
the representations that our Republican friends have made.
  Those words are sounding very hollow, however, today. Why are 
Republicans breaking their word, Madam Speaker? Because, in my opinion, 
they know that the only way to get their conference to support this 
spending bill is to bribe it with a year of defense spending left 
untouched and a divisive

[[Page 5272]]

social policy provision as well, which is what they said they would not 
do.
  What we need to do is sit down and over the next 72 hours, now over 
the next 48 hours, frankly, come to compromise. That's our job. ``My 
way or the highway'' is never going to get it done.
  Finally, Republicans showed their priorities in their budget for the 
upcoming fiscal year. We will have a lot to say about that in the days 
ahead.
  Their budget ends Medicare as we know it. Seniors thought that they 
were going to protect Medicare. Well, their way of protecting it is 
ending it. It dismantles Medicaid and other vital programs for our 
seniors. We will talk a lot about that in the coming days.
  And on top of that, it includes yet trillions more in tax cuts for 
the wealthiest Americans.
  We can do better. Rather than using our debt as an excuse to pass a 
nakedly partisan agenda, we need to take a bipartisan approach that 
puts everything on the table:
  Keeping our entitlement programs solvent; scrutinizing our spending, 
defense and non-defense, for waste and low priorities; and passing 
deficit-reducing tax reform.
  Those are the hard choices and shared sacrifices that Americans have 
a right to expect.

                          ____________________