[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 157 (2011), Part 2]
[House]
[Pages 2090-2091]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                 OPPOSITION TO CUTTING FUNDING TO FEMA

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from 
California (Ms. Richardson) for 5 minutes.
  Ms. RICHARDSON. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak in opposition to 
H.R. 1. First of all, I want to begin my comments by talking about last 
night, a couple issues that were so important to many of us. Number 
one, COPS grant funding, and also CDBG, which stands for Community 
Development Block Grants.
  Now, I don't know about many of you, but I started my legislative 
career in local government, and, for most of us, we know that COPS 
grant funding is what actually puts the police officers on the streets, 
in the neighborhoods, that can help protect the communities.

[[Page 2091]]

Now, I would ask you, do you want to take two police officers out of 
your neighborhood? I don't think so.
  I would ask the question, why are we willing to support police 
officers in Iraq and Afghanistan and to do nation building there, and 
yet we are not willing to do nation building in our own country? 
Something is wrong with this proposal today. We don't have the right 
priorities, and that is why I stand in opposition.
  Community Development Block Grants. When I was on the city council, 
what did that fund? Parks, housing, to help businesses. Do we want to 
say no to that? Is that what really this budget is about? Is that where 
the abuses have been, in the neighborhoods? I wouldn't say yes to that.
  So let me end with my last comments, which I am going to focus on, 
which is the committee of jurisdiction on which I serve. I am the 
ranking member of the Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and 
Response Subcommittee. I stand in opposition to Sections 1628 through 
1634 and 1648 of this bill, which cut funding to the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, also known as FEMA. I oppose these provisions 
because they are unwise, irresponsible, and they undermine what our 
Nation learned.
  Do we want to go back? How many of us remember watching on television 
when we looked at 9/11. How many of us remember Hurricane Katrina. It 
wasn't that long ago, and I know I don't want to go back.
  This bill that the Republicans have brought to the floor is reckless. 
It is not only reckless to our economy, it is reckless to the American 
workers, and, above all, it puts our national security in harm's way.
  The terrorist acts of September 11 revealed the catastrophic 
consequences of our inability to communicate. Have we forgotten? We 
just got interoperable radios in my district in Signal Hill just last 
year. They are not all connected, and it is a huge vulnerability for 
all of us. Communication glitches also occurred during the response to 
Hurricane Katrina, yet the Republicans want to step back and terminate 
those grants for interoperable emergency communications.
  Have we not learned anything? These draconian cuts will put our first 
responders at risk and slow down the response to terrorist attacks and 
natural disasters. I cannot in good conscience, and I don't think any 
of you can as well, accept these cuts to such vital pieces of emergency 
equipment that we all need and we depend upon.
  Further, this shortsighted Republican plan also puts our Nation's 
firefighting ability at risk. Now, I am from California. We know about 
fires. We know about the need for firefighters. This bill would 
eliminate the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants 
program. You tell the resident who has lost their home that, oh, we 
will deal with this next year. Fires aren't something you plan. They 
are an emergency that has to be responded to.
  So when we call upon our firefighters, the International Association 
of Firefighters, they are opposed to this. Why? Not because they are 
not being fiscally responsible, but because this bill would cut jobs, 
5,200 jobs on top of the 5,000 firefighters we have already lost. Is 
your community willing to lose more firefighters? I don't think so.
  The city of Compton in my district is the future home to an emergency 
operations communications center operated by FEMA. My district is home 
to several major oil refineries, gas treatment facilities, 
petrochemical facilities, and, of course, the challenges and 
opportunities of two ports, of both the ports of Los Angeles and Long 
Beach. These centralized major business economic engines thrive. But we 
also have problems sometimes, and that is why we need the appropriate 
support of fire and communications to protect them.
  This Republican bill seeks to destroy jobs, to end operation centers, 
all of the things that we have learned from the past. I can't support 
depriving first responders of the equipment they need to do their jobs. 
I can't support this bill and hurt our firefighters, our police 
officers and those who choose to serve us.
  So, Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 1, and I urge my 
colleagues to really look at this bill closely and make sure that our 
communities aren't paying. But the real abuses that got us here, that 
is where the cuts should begin.

                          ____________________