[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 157 (2011), Part 2]
[House]
[Pages 1836-1940]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




             FULL-YEAR CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2011

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 92 and rule 
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House 
on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill, H.R. 1.

                              {time}  1414


                     In the Committee of the Whole

  Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the 
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 1) making appropriations for the Department of Defense and other 
departments and agencies of the Government for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2011, and for other purposes, with Mr. Lucas in the 
chair.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The CHAIR. Pursuant to the rule, the bill is considered read the 
first time.
  The gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Rogers) and the gentleman from 
Washington (Mr. Dicks) each will control 30 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I 
may consume.
  The continuing resolution on the floor today represents the largest 
reduction in non-security discretionary spending in the history of the 
Nation. It funds the Federal Government for the remainder of the 2011 
fiscal year, but, most importantly, Mr. Chairman, it answers taxpayers' 
callings to right our Nation's fiscal ship, making specific, 
substantive and comprehensive spending reductions, cutting more than 
$100 billion, compared with the President's fiscal 2011 budget request.
  This CR reverses a trend of out-of-control Democrat spending over the 
last 2 years that has increased overall discretionary funding, 
including stimulus, by 84 percent in 2 years. Never before has Congress 
undertaken a task of this magnitude, but never before have we been 
faced with a deficit crisis of this scale. The government is borrowing 
over 40 cents of every dollar that it spends.
  Our constituents sent us a clear, decisive message in the last 
election. They want government to spend less, stop undue interference 
in American lives and businesses, and take action to create jobs and 
get our economy moving again. Through the Republican Pledge to America, 
we made the commitment to do just that, and today we offer the first 
step in fulfilling these promises by presenting a spending package to 
the American people that makes deep but manageable cuts in nearly every 
area of the government.
  This bill is about shared commitments and shared sacrifice. Make no 
mistake: These cuts will not be easy, and they will affect every 
congressional district. But they are necessary and long overdue. 
Although we recognize that every dollar we cut has a constituency of 
support, an association, an industry, individual citizens who will 
disagree with our decision, these cuts are the necessary difficult work 
by our subcommittees to make the smartest and fairest reductions 
possible.
  No stones were left unturned, no programs were held sacred. The 
Appropriations Committee went line by line to craft a responsible, 
judicious CR, one that will allow our economy to thrive, our businesses 
to create jobs and our national security to be strengthened. Our 
subcommittees scoured the budget for wasteful activities and cleaned 
out excessive and unnecessary spending, while prioritizing the most 
essential and effective programs, including $460 million for 
accelerating the process through which veterans resolve their health 
care claims and an additional $13 million for increased oversight of 
the Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP.
  The CR includes absolutely no earmark funding and eliminates all 
previous earmark funding from fiscal year 2010, saving taxpayers 
approximately $8.5 billion. Furthermore, it includes a provision to 
eliminate any unobligated stimulus funding approved in the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act, another $5 billion of taxpayer dollars 
saved.
  As we help put our Nation's budget back into balance, we are finding 
real savings that are justifiable to the American people and that will 
stop the dangerous spiral of unsustainable and irresponsible deficits.
  In addition, this CR is only the first of many appropriations bills 
this year that will significantly trim Federal

[[Page 1837]]

spending. It is hard-and-fast proof that we are serious about returning 
our Nation to a sustainable financial and fiscal path.

                              {time}  1420

  However, so that we can continue the important work of reducing 
spending in our regular budgetary work for this year, the House, 
Senate, and White House must come together to complete this process 
before March 4, when our current funding measure expires. It is 
critically important that the House move this CR to avoid a government 
shutdown and get these spending cuts passed by the House, over to the 
Senate, and let them act their will to avoid a shutdown, and then get 
the bill to the President. The American people expect no less.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 5 minutes.
  Mr. Chairman, it is clear that a debt crisis is looming. There is no 
denying that we need a comprehensive plan to reduce the debt over the 
long term. What the majority offers instead in this bill is a one-
dimensional focus on the smallest segment of spending in the Federal 
budget. We believe that at this time we should be putting everything on 
the table: discretionary spending, entitlements, and taxes. Without a 
more comprehensive approach to this debt crisis, we cannot effectively 
change the trajectory and begin to bring our public debt downward. 
Without a more comprehensive budgetary approach, what we would be 
offering to the American people would be what Alan Simpson has called 
``a sparrow's belch in the midst of a typhoon.''
  As we address the debt crisis, it is fundamental that we should first 
do no harm to the fragile economic recovery. Here I am just echoing 
what many others have said. As the bipartisan Fiscal Commission put it, 
``In order to avoid shocking the fragile economy, the Commission 
recommends waiting until 2012 to begin enacting programmatic spending 
cuts, and waiting until fiscal year 2013 before making large nominal 
cuts.''
  Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in his testimony last week to the House 
Budget Committee said, ``To the extent you can change programs that 
will have long-term effects on spending and revenues, that will be a 
more effective and credible program than one that focuses only on the 
current fiscal year. The right way to do this doesn't put too much 
pressure on the ongoing recovery.''
  As the Democratic leader just said, there is a recent analysis done 
by the Economic Policy Institute that says a full $100 billion cut to 
discretionary spending would likely result in job losses on the order 
of 994,000, using OMB's GDP projections and CBO projections based on 
current law, and assuming a fiscal multiplier of 1.5 percent.
  So this is a very serious matter. We Democrats support dealing with 
waste, fraud, and abuse. We want to see a program. I personally support 
President Obama's 5-year freeze on domestic spending, with puts and 
takes, because it doesn't cut as much in the first year. This is all 
about timing. And I recognize that my colleagues over on this side of 
the aisle believe and think that what they're doing is going to have a 
positive economic effect and that this will somehow create economic 
activity and lower the deficit, lower unemployment. I hope and pray 
they're right, because if what I think and most economists--reputable 
economists--think is true, this will have a negative effect and hurt 
the economy and hurt the people that are out there who are unemployed.
  So I think we need to think about this very, very carefully. And cuts 
of this magnitude, as the chairman said, have never been done before. 
We are in uncharted waters. We all recognize that we have to have a 
plan for the deficit. But the plan has to include entitlements, has to 
include taxes. Discretionary spending is one-third of the budget. You 
could cut and cut and cut, and you're still not going to solve the 
problem.
  So, hopefully, we can do what we did in the 1980s with Tip O'Neill 
and Bob Dole, and that is have a bipartisan approach, like they're 
doing in the Senate today, where Democrats and Republicans get together 
and work on all of these issues and come up with a credible plan. That 
is the way to do this.
  And I see my good friend, Mr. Young from Florida. I just want to say 
that I have enjoyed working with him for over 30 years, and I strongly 
support the defense part of this bill. The defense part of this bill 
has been worked out on a bipartisan basis by the Defense Subcommittee. 
It does make reductions in spending but it does it in a very careful 
and professional way. And I want to commend the gentleman from Florida 
for his leadership over the years on national security issues.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the 
chairman of the Republican Conference in the House, the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. Hensarling).
  Mr. HENSARLING. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, if we want to have jobs today, if we want to protect 
our children from bankruptcy tomorrow, we've got to quit spending money 
we don't have. There is a debt crisis in America, and it is spending 
driven, being led by the President and other friends from the other 
side of the aisle. It is a true crisis. The Chairman of the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, has said the biggest threat we 
have to our national security is our debt. One of these reputable 
economists that the previous gentleman spoke about, Robert Samuelson, 
has said this spending could trigger an economic and political death 
spiral. Democrat Erskine Bowles, who headed up the President's Fiscal 
Responsibility Commission, said the ``debt is like a cancer. It's truly 
going to destroy the country from within.'' And what do we have, Mr. 
Chairman? We have the President presenting a new budget that will again 
double the national debt in 5 years, triple it in 10, add $13 trillion 
worth of red ink to the Nation's debt. This is after expanding garden-
variety government 84 percent in 2 years, non-defense discretionary. 
Mr. Chairman, you can't spend money you don't have. Massive debts lead 
to massive tax increases. Massive tax increases lead to no jobs.
  The Chairman of the Federal Reserve has said one of the best ways 
that we can improve jobs today is to put our Nation on a sustainable 
fiscal course. And I heard the gentleman say that entitlement spending 
should be on the table. Clearly, the President hasn't gotten the 
message. It's not what we saw in his budget. We haven't seen it in any 
other Democrat budget. So it would be wonderful if we saw it. But we 
don't see it.
  I talk to business people in my own district, Mr. Chairman, like 
Diane Ford of Kaufman, Texas, a small business lady. When she stares in 
the face of this debt and she sees the tax increase, she writes, 
``Congressman, I couldn't hire any more employees. I couldn't expand my 
business. I would definitely have to close up shop. As a small business 
owner, I'm afraid of my future.'' Small business people all around the 
Nation know that massive debt leads to massive tax increases. It leads 
to no jobs. If we want to create jobs, we have to take care of this 
debt.
  And think about future generations, Mr. Chairman. I heard from one of 
my other constituents who said, ``I've never felt so embarrassed and 
ashamed about anything I've done in my life as I do about leaving this 
mess in the laps of Tyler and Caitlin, my precious grandkids.'' He's 
talking about the national debt.
  To protect future generations, to create jobs today, we've got to 
quit spending money we don't have. And I want to congratulate the 
chairman of the Appropriations Committee for his excellent work in 
turning the corner.
  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from 
Virginia (Mr. Moran), the ranking member of the Interior and 
Environment Appropriations Subcommittee.
  Mr. MORAN. Mr. Chairman, I have been on the Appropriations Committee 
for 17 years. Eleven of them were under Republican control, eight under 
a Republican President. And I'm proud of

[[Page 1838]]

the investments that we've made in this country during those 17 years. 
We were stronger, more secure, a more productive economy as a result of 
those investments.

                              {time}  1430

  We've improved the lives of Americans. We've cleaned up our water. 
We've invested in transportation, our national defense, our education 
system. That's why we have the strongest economy and why, in fact, we 
continue to be the very best place on the planet to live, to work, and 
to provide a better future for our children.
  What we are doing in this continuing resolution is targeting those 
programs that are called ``domestic discretionary.'' They represent 
about 4\1/2\ percent of the entire budget, and they have stayed pretty 
well even. During the Reagan administration, during the Clinton 
administration, during the Bush administration, which was when we had 
the lowest job growth ever, they were at about 7\1/2\ percent.
  The fact is we are not going to balance our budget by targeting that 
small amount of the budget. The reality is that, when President Reagan 
left office, tax receipts were about 18.2 percent. They went up a bit 
during the Clinton administration when we had the greatest expansion 
ever and when, in fact, people at the highest rate of income tax 
pocketed more money after taxes than at any time in American history. 
Right now, they are at 14.9 percent of GDP.
  I would suggest, Mr. Chairman, that the problem is not one of not 
investing enough in our country, but one of the revenue being brought 
in and its being grossly inadequate. In a historical context, we can 
prove that to be the case. When revenue goes down that low, our economy 
shrinks; and it becomes a self-defeating cycle.
  Now, in the Interior and the Environment appropriations bill, some of 
the things we do is take out the program that uses offshore oil 
revenues for the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which protects our 
Nation's precious lands. We are going to dramatically cut construction 
and maintenance at our national parks, refuges and forests. We are 
going to take the money away from the Governors and mayors throughout 
the country for the plumbing that goes underneath our land, what's 
called the Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Revolving Fund. That's 
money they desperately need to ensure the public's health. We take it 
for granted. We won't take it for granted anymore if we stop those 
grants.
  This bill will not create a single new job. In fact, we estimate it 
will cut about 800,000 jobs, both public and private. That's not worthy 
of this Congress on either side of the aisle to be cutting jobs. What 
we need to be doing is investing in jobs, investing in education, and 
making sure that children who have been born in particularly difficult 
social and economic conditions have access to Head Start.
  Don't cut $1 billion out of Head Start. Don't cut kindergarten 
through 12 education, which is the seed corn of our future. Those 
aren't investments. Those are arbitrary cuts. That's not what we have 
been about, and that's not how we enable this country to be as strong 
and as great as it is.
  I would suggest, Mr. Chairman, that when we do our budget analysis 
that it be done with a scalpel, like a surgeon would approach it, not 
with a meat ax. We should respect all of the good work that the 
appropriations committees have done over the years in making this a 
better country as a result.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield 4 minutes to the 
immediate past chairman of the committee, the now chairman emeritus of 
the committee, the gentleman from California (Mr. Lewis).
  Mr. LEWIS of California. I very much appreciate my colleague, the 
chairman, for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, some of my colleagues say they are shocked at the 
spending reductions we have proposed here. No one should be surprised. 
For the past several years, Congress and the administration have been 
spending like there is no tomorrow.
  Since FY '08, we have increased non-security discretionary spending 
by almost 25 percent. In some areas, it has jumped by nearly a third in 
2 years. Those were historic spending increases, and they don't even 
include the $800 billion that was in the massive failed stimulus 
package. That was such a huge amount of money that some agencies still 
have not been able to spend it 2 years later.
  Well, my colleagues, tomorrow is here. The bill is coming due; and if 
we do not find a way to stop spending, we are headed towards fiscal 
disaster.
  This absolutely should surprise no one. Republicans on the 
Appropriations Committee have been warning for 2 years that we cannot 
continue spending this way. We tried to stop it, to at least slow it 
down; but for the past 2 years we have not even been able to get an 
amendment to change the direction of our spendthrift ways.
  So now we are faced with record deficits. The President's budget 
predicts an all-time high of $1.65 trillion in red ink next year. We 
have been warned that the Federal debt limit of $14 trillion must be 
increased. Within a decade, our Federal debt could equal more than 70 
percent of our GDP.
  Without question, this kind of spending is going to run our Federal 
budget off a cliff, and it will do more harm to our economy than we've 
seen from the current terrible recession. At least a third of our 
national debt is owned by foreign nations and investors. What will they 
do if we cannot begin to pay it down?
  Last year, we paid nearly $415 billion in interest on our national 
debt. That is more than we spent on any discretionary government 
program other than defense. That is hundreds of billions of dollars not 
being spent to create jobs, not being spent to fix our roads, not being 
spent to secure our Nation; and it will continue to grow at an ever 
faster rate as long as we keep running up these huge deficits.
  The American people told us last November that it is time to stop. 
They were alarmed enough to raise questions all over the country. They, 
indeed, at the polls indicated that we needed to find a new direction. 
They want fiscal sanity. They want us to stop spending now before it is 
too late. The spending reductions in this package are extremely 
painful. The cuts will affect programs supported by every Member of 
this House. When Americans begin to understand what is being reduced, 
we will all be receiving calls from people who are asking us to change 
our minds.
  We must resist these calls for more spending. We cannot become 
Europe, where citizens believe that government can do everything. We 
cannot let the United States become another Greece or another Ireland 
or another Portugal--faced with fiscal collapse.
  We have to make the decision now. These cuts will seem harsh, but we 
cannot avoid them. We cannot settle for half measures in the hopes that 
in 5 or 10 years we will stop adding to this terrible Federal debt. 
This is just the down payment. We need to begin entitlement reform to 
really solve our fiscal problems, but we must start now and we must 
start here.
  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Connecticut, Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, who is the new ranking member 
on the Health and Human Services Appropriations Subcommittee and who 
was the former chairman and ranking member on Agriculture.
  Ms. DeLAURO. I rise in opposition to this continuing resolution.
  Mr. Chairman, Americans want us to work together to address their top 
priority--creating jobs, fostering economic recovery. Unfortunately, 
the majority's priorities are deeply out of touch with those of the 
country.
  Democrats are committed to reducing the deficit. We believe, as 
taxpayers do, that we should start by ending tax subsidies and special 
interest waste. We should be slashing oil companies' subsidies first. 
We must make programs accountable and end the ones that do not work. We 
can no longer afford to continue the tax breaks for the top 2 percent 
of the country. Republicans are in a reckless rush to slash without 
regard to the impact on our economy, on the businesses which create 
jobs or on middle class or working

[[Page 1839]]

families who are being responsible, doing the best for their families 
and educating for the future.

                              {time}  1440

  They are hitting ordinary, hardworking families with children, our 
young people trying to get an education, and the elderly. That is their 
starting point.
  Under their budget every student in America receiving a Pell Grant, 
close to 9 million people, will see their aid slashed by almost $850 a 
year; 1.3 million students will lose their supplemental education 
opportunity grants and, thus, the ability to pay for college. Their 
plan cuts more than 200,000 kids out of Head Start, kids who will 
forever lose the opportunity for an early childhood education. They cut 
aid to school districts and special education. They will cut 55,000 
Head Start teachers and close down 16,000 Head Start classrooms.
  As with education, so too with jobs. In the midst of a recession and 
a tough labor market, training and employment services, proven-to-work 
programs are cut now by $5 billion. That means 8.4 million job seekers, 
flesh and blood human beings, could lose access to this aid completely.
  In these tough economic times, it's our low-income seniors who are 
the most vulnerable. This budget eliminates at least 10 million new 
meals delivered to the homebound elderly, cuts fuel assistance for them 
as well. It will force seniors to either go hungry or move into nursing 
homes and others to have to choose whether to eat or to stay warm.
  The challenge is not whether we address the deficit and spending or 
not. The question is where do we start to cut. Do we start with 
slashing ineffective programs and special interest waste, like $40 
billion in oil company subsidies? Or do we start cutting those that 
help the middle class, our businesses, and working families with 
children, and seniors?
  Our job is to get this budget back to common sense, to create jobs, 
to get this economy running again for the people of this Nation. This 
continuing resolution offered by the Republicans will do neither.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. I yield 3 minutes to the chairman of the 
Labor-HHS Subcommittee on Appropriations, the gentleman from Montana 
(Mr. Rehberg).
  Mr. REHBERG. Thank you, Mr. Rogers.
  Members of this body, I have an obligation as chairman of the 
Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and 
Education to tell you the simple truth. We're bleeding cash, piling up 
liabilities, and trying to postpone the day of reckoning; and as a 
result, America is in a financial free-fall.
  In 4 quick years, Congress made what was a spending problem into a 
spending crisis. We on this side of the aisle wanted to create jobs; 
you wasted time on a health care reform bill that did not reform health 
care. While we wanted to build an economy, you wasted time building 
government. Unfortunately, many in Washington, D.C., especially on 
Capitol Hill, are in denial.
  My colleagues, it's time to stop pretending that the well of wealth 
in this country is bottomless. We must address spending now, or it will 
be worse next year.
  Two years ago, the Congress passed a stimulus bill totaling nearly $1 
trillion. Unfortunately, now we know it did not stimulate. And we know 
a lot of money went for programs, not necessarily bad programs, but 
programs that couldn't stimulate the economy. But the biggest travesty 
of Washington's stimulus spending spree is not that it was a waste of 
money; it's that the money has been stolen in plain sight from our 
children and grandchildren. That is what taxation without 
representation looks like in the 21st century, and it means our 
Nation's fiscal mess is not just a math problem. It's a moral problem, 
and we owe it to our children to have much better leadership.
  That's why I stand before you with a savings of $23 billion in the 
three Departments I have responsibility for. No program is immune from 
waste. So there are no more sacred cows. No law, regulation, or program 
is perfect or timeless. If something is not working, we will fix it or 
eliminate it. In my subcommittee, we want to help people, to help train 
people, to help educate people; but we've learned repeatedly that 
simply throwing more and more money at well-intentioned programs does 
not necessarily work.
  Those who want to spend money have the burden of proof; and with the 
debt crisis we face, that burden is a heavy one. Those seeking funding 
have to prove that the programs are working. Show us the results. Show 
us that the benefits outweigh the costs. Show us that government can do 
a better job with this money than the private sector.
  This continuing resolution is a change in direction, away from 
looking to bigger government solutions to empowering individuals and 
small businesses to create jobs and grow this economy. Anyone who 
relies on Federal funding has a patriotic duty to look for ways to get 
by on less for the sake of our country's future today and tomorrow.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished former chairman and 
now ranking member of the THUD Appropriations Subcommittee, the 
gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Olver).
  Mr. OLVER. I thank the gentleman for yielding time.
  Mr. Chairman, this continuing resolution clearly endangers the 
fragile recovery of America's economy. While I have the greatest 
respect for Chairman Latham, he has been saddled with an irrational 
task of cutting $15.5 billion, a 23 percent cut, from the 
``Transportation and Housing'' title of the resolution. I cannot fathom 
how the new majority, which proclaims to be all about jobs, could as 
their first piece of business impose deep cuts upon the very programs 
that have the greatest potential for creating jobs and that provide the 
necessary foundation for a strong economic recovery.
  Specifically, the continuing resolution cuts funding for the 
Community Development Block Grants program by more than 60 percent to 
by far the lowest level since the program was created in 1975 under a 
Republican President, President Gerald Ford. As a result, over 1,200 
cities and towns across all 50 States will be forced to shelve local 
economic development projects in every one of our districts, and the 
associated 45,000 jobs will be lost.
  In addition, the bill proposes to cut over $7 billion in 
transportation and infrastructure investments. This includes reductions 
that force Amtrak to lay off roughly 1,500 employees and will halt work 
on 76 TIGER grants already announced in 40 States and cancel the 
associated 25,000 construction jobs.
  Finally, as we consider the ongoing housing needs of our most 
vulnerable citizens, this bill reduces by $760 million, a 75 percent 
cut, programs serving elderly and disabled persons, handcuffing our 
ability to keep up with the support required to meet the needs of our 
expanding and aging senior population.
  In addition, the $75 million cut to our Veterans Affairs Supportive 
Housing, VASH, program is frankly appalling. Just last week, HUD 
released a report indicating that more than 76,000 veterans are 
homeless on any given night and that vets are 50 percent more likely to 
be homeless. Yet the majority's bill turns its back on our homeless 
vets, leaving them literally out in the cold.
  Mr. Chairman, while I'm glad this bill does not meet the Republican 
majority's pledge to cut $100 billion in non-security spending, it will 
still have a dramatic negative impact on American families, while 
making no more than a ripple in the ocean of additional national debt 
caused by the massive tax cuts adopted during the Bush administration, 
at the very time that America has engaged in two trillion-dollar wars 
in the Islamic world.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the 
chairman of the Transportation and HUD Subcommittee on Appropriations, 
the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Latham).
  Mr. LATHAM. I thank the gentleman from Kentucky.

[[Page 1840]]

  Mr. Chairman, I would just maybe respond a little bit to what the 
gentleman from Massachusetts just said. The fact of the matter is there 
will not be a veteran, a homeless vet, that will not get a voucher. The 
fact of the matter is there are 30,000 vouchers available today. Only 
19,000 of those have been used. There are 11,000 vouchers waiting; and 
the problem basically is with the Department, with HUD and VA, as far 
as trying to write the rules to actually get these people the vouchers 
they need.
  So any kind of characterization that we're putting vets out in the 
cold is absolutely untrue. You have your opinion, but the facts speak 
for themselves.

                              {time}  1450

  Now also we are not reducing any such section 8 vouchers. They will 
remain. No one is going to be put out anywhere. We maintain those 
programs for those folks, and to characterize it in any way differently 
simply is not factual.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield myself 1 minute.
  I would say to the gentleman, here is the problem: There are, I 
think, about 29,000 of these vouchers out there now. And you are 
correct; some of them haven't been able to find a place to live yet. 
Secretary Shinseki, who I talked to personally about this, and 
Secretary Donovan have said there are 60,000 of these veterans who need 
this voucher. So there are 30,000 more that we need to do. I was 
shocked when I saw on the list of terminations that your side decided 
to terminate this program. I hoped you would reconsider that.
  Mr. LATHAM. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. DICKS. I yield to the gentleman from Iowa.
  Mr. LATHAM. There are 11,000 vouchers sitting there unused today. 
There are 19,000 that have been issued. The gentleman knows that we are 
not cutting those. There are 11,000 still available under this bill. 
And we are going to review this as we go through for the next fiscal 
year, 2012.
  Mr. DICKS. That is what I was going to ask the gentleman. I would 
like to work with him on this. So if that's the gentleman's intent, 
then we will work together and try to get the job done.
  Mr. LATHAM. I appreciate that. I thank the gentleman.
  Mr. DICKS. I now yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. 
Serrano), the former chairman and now the ranking member of the 
Financial Services Committee.
  Mr. SERRANO. The continuing resolution that we are voting on today is 
irresponsible and extreme. We all recognize that we should take 
reasonable steps to address our deficit. However, what we are voting on 
today makes cuts that will harm our students, our public safety, our 
health, and our environment.
  When I served as chair of the Financial Services Subcommittee, I 
worked hard to make sure that we protected the consumer, the investor, 
and the taxpayer. The agencies funded by this subcommittee ensure that 
Americans can have confidence in the products that they use and the 
security of their investments. The CR that we are considering today, 
with its cuts to the IRS and the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
fails to provide sufficient resources to meet these challenges.
  IRS funding will be cut by $600 million, and this will have an 
immediate impact on taxpayer services as we approach the busy tax 
season. The IRS will be forced to cut as many as 4,100 employees, 
mainly enforcement agents, and this will harm the ability of the IRS to 
find tax cheaters. It is important to remember that if we reduce the 
government's ability to collect taxes, this will actually increase our 
deficit, since enforcement resources have a $7-to-$1 return on 
investment.
  The Securities and Exchange Commission will see a $41 million 
reduction from last year, which will prevent it from hiring the staff 
it needs to carry out the critical new Dodd-Frank financial oversight 
functions that it has been given. This will mean that hedge funds, 
credit rating agencies, and broker-dealers will continue to operate 
without regulation, adding to an increased risk of another fiscal 
meltdown.
  As chair of this subcommittee, I also worked hard to make sure that 
capital and other assistance went to small businesses and low-income 
communities. A key part of this was making sure that the Community 
Development Financial Institutions Fund had the resources it needed to 
support financial institutions making investments in disadvantaged 
communities. Under the continuing resolution which we are voting on 
today, the CDFI Fund will get slashed from $246 million last year to 
just $50 million this year. This will mean that more than 19,000 jobs 
will non-materialize, more than 14,000 affordable housing units will 
not be built, and more than 3,100 small businesses will not be 
assisted.
  I am particularly distressed that the majority party decided to 
meddle once again in the District of Columbia's local affairs. We 
should all be able to agree that D.C. should be left alone to decide 
how to spend its own locally derived funds. One local program that the 
majority has decided to ban is the syringe exchange program. The 
science on this is clear: Giving addicts clean needles does nothing to 
drive up drug use, but it does do wonders to prevent the spread of HIV/
AIDS. Even if you do not believe the science, you should not meddle in 
the District of Columbia.
  Another impact of the funding resolution we are voting on today will 
be a weakening of the equitable and efficient administration of justice 
in the Federal courts. The $476 million cut to the Judiciary will force 
the federal courts to lay off more than 2,400 support staff and stop 
payments to the attorneys who represent indigent criminal defendants.
  There are numerous other cuts across the range of Agencies that are 
included in the Financial Service and General Government section--some 
that would severely impact jobs and others that would negatively affect 
our election practices. For example, the General Services 
Administration (GSA) Federal Building Fund will see a cut of $1.7 
billion from FY2010, which will result in the elimination of nearly 
16,000 private sector construction jobs and as many as 40,000 
janitorial and maintenance jobs. The Election Assistance Commission 
will see a huge budget drop from $93 million last year to $10 million 
this year, effectively ending its work to help states improve their 
election practices and equipment.
  So let me conclude by saying that the deficit cutting approach that 
we are voting on today will not only result in significant harm to 
America's consumers, investors, taxpayers, workers, businesses in 
disadvantaged communities, and the security of our elections, but it 
will also impact education, housing, transportation, health, the 
environment and all facets of our economic recovery. I would urge my 
colleagues to vote no.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the 
chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee, the gentleman from 
Alabama (Mr. Alderholt).
  Mr. ADERHOLT. I thank the chairman for yielding.
  Mr. Chair, as many have said here today, our government has a 
spending problem, and the American people are demanding that we find a 
solution. This CR that is before the House today is a step towards 
finding a solution to that problem.
  The homeland security title of this CR strikes the right balance 
between funding priority programs that are essential to our Nation's 
security and at the same time keeping our discretionary spending in 
check. This CR provides a total of $41.5 billion in discretionary 
funding for the Department of Homeland Security. This funding level is 
$1 billion, or 2.4 percent, below FY 2010 and $2.1 billion, or 4.8 
percent, below the President's FY 2011 request.
  In contrast to previous annual spending bills, this CR provides 
funding for the annual costs of disasters from within the existing 
budget. So rather than relying upon emergency supplementals, the CR 
responsibly addresses the $1.6 billion shortfall in disaster relief 
costs that the President has failed to address in the 2011 budget 
request. Supporting the cost of security demands truth-in-budgeting, 
and we are delivering where the President and OMB have failed.
  Having said that, the Department of Homeland Security is not immune 
from fiscal discipline. Underperforming programs have been 
significantly cut in this CR that we are debating today.

[[Page 1841]]

Let me add, by implementing these cuts, we are not choosing between 
homeland security and fiscal responsibility. Both are serious national 
security issues, and they must be dealt with immediately. And through a 
series of tough choices, this CR achieves both. That is precisely why 
this CR includes sufficient funding to sustain critical operations in 
the front-line agencies such as the CBP, Coast Guard, ICE, the TSA, and 
the Department's Intelligence Office.
  Mr. Chair, homeland security is far too important to be subject to 
budget gimmicks and inadequate justifications. The homeland security 
title of this CR responsibly funds programs vital to our Nation's 
security, and it will help them get back on track from our Federal 
budget perspective.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from North Carolina 
(Mr. Price), who has been the chairman and now the ranking member of 
the Homeland Security Subcommittee.
  Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. Mr. Chair, if there ever were a case of 
overheated campaign rhetoric overtaking responsible governing, then we 
are seeing that case here today.
  Far from continuing to fund the government through to the end of the 
fiscal year, this measure would dramatically slash the investments in 
our economic recovery and undermine our national security in the 
process. I don't know why we even call it a continuing resolution--I 
guess to avoid a markup in the Appropriations Committee. But it's a 
brand new appropriations bill, and a very destructive one at that. It's 
a job-killer of all kinds of jobs but most especially of national 
security jobs.
  Let's talk about firefighters. We rely on our firefighters as our 
preeminent first responders. They arrive at the scene of all types of 
emergencies--attempted bombings, security incidents, medical, fire 
emergencies, all kinds of emergencies. But this bill eliminates the 
SAFER firefighter staffing program, guaranteeing that thousands of 
firefighters will lose their jobs this year, according to the Fire 
Chiefs Association. SAFER has enabled our local communities to avoid 
firefighter layoffs in tough economic times, to keep their fire 
departments at full strength. This Republican continuing resolution 
would just simply remove this protection.

                              {time}  1500

  Let's talk about law enforcement, funded in the Commerce-Justice 
appropriations bill. We rely on our local police officers, not only as 
first responders, but also as first detectors of homegrown terrorist 
activity. Yet this bill eliminates the Community Policing grant 
program, the COPS program, guaranteeing that local governments which 
are already laying off workers will have to fire between 1,300 and 
3,000 police officers.
  Now, these job losses could be prevented if we were attempting to 
govern seriously instead of appeasing the Republican tea party base. 
The best cure for our budget deficit is a recovered economy, not a bill 
that slashes and burns government services that are critical to our 
economic competitiveness and to our public safety.
  So I urge a ``no'' vote on this CR. Instead of a continuing 
resolution, we might say that CR in this case stands for ``Continuing 
the Recession,'' because that's really what this bill would achieve.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Texas (Ms. Granger), the chairman of the State, Foreign Operations 
Subcommittee on Appropriations.
  Ms. GRANGER. For too long we have seen unsustainable increases in 
spending. This bill before us today puts an end to that practice by 
making unprecedented cuts to the Federal budget. As chair of the State, 
Foreign Operations Subcommittee, I know the difficult tradeoffs that 
have to be made to achieve these levels of cuts, but we cannot continue 
to ignore our skyrocketing deficits and our debt.
  In the bill before us, we are taking our pledge to cut spending 
seriously. Since fiscal year 2008, the State, Foreign Operations budget 
has had dramatic increases. This bill begins to rein in the growth of 
many programs.
  The State, Foreign Operations title of the bill before us is $44.9 
billion. This represents a 21 percent reduction from the President's 
fiscal year 2011 request, an 8 percent reduction from the fiscal year 
2010 enacted level, and an 18 percent reduction from the fiscal year 
2010 level with supplemental appropriations.
  Let me be clear. While these are dramatic cuts, I support the goals 
and objectives of using civilian power to achieve our national security 
goals.
  To achieve the level of savings included for the remainder of FY11, 
reductions were made in areas that, while difficult, preserve important 
efforts and priorities. For example, the bill before us supports top 
national security priorities, maintains momentum in Iraq, Afghanistan 
and Pakistan, and fully funds the U.S.-Israel memorandum of 
understanding at $3 billion. It continues the fight against illegal 
drug trafficking in Mexico, Central America and Colombia.
  In order to do all of these things in this bill, new activities are 
paused, many programs are scaled back, and large administrative 
commitments like climate change are shelved. While these choices were 
difficult, they must be made in order to preserve our national security 
priorities.
  There is a need for continued oversight in our foreign aid, and for 
that reason, I've included language which provides additional oversight 
for countries like Afghanistan and Lebanon.
  I would like to thank Ranking Member Lowey for her dedication to the 
subcommittee as chair for the last 4 years, and I look forward to 
continuing to work together. We both agree that Members on both sides 
of the aisle deserve to be heard on the important foreign policy 
matters that come before our subcommittee.
  I hope this bill will move forward quickly to ensure important 
government operations are continued in a manner that is fiscally 
responsible and meets our foreign policy challenges around the world.
  The CHAIR. The Chair would note that the gentleman from Kentucky has 
9 minutes remaining; the gentleman from Washington has 9 minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from New York, 
the former chair of the State, Foreign Operations Subcommittee, now the 
ranking member, my good friend, Nita Lowey.
  Mrs. LOWEY. I thank the gentleman, our distinguished chair. It's been 
a pleasure working with you. And I just want to say to the current 
chair of our committee, we've always worked in a bipartisan way, and 
that's why I reluctantly rise in opposition to the State and Foreign 
Operations budget in the CR. But I look forward to continuing to work 
together.
  These are irresponsible cuts. These cuts would threaten global 
security and stability. Despite broad agreement that a three-legged 
stool of defense, diplomacy, and development is vital to our national 
security, this bill dramatically weakens diplomacy and development.
  On a positive note, I'm pleased with the inclusion of $3 billion 
pursuant to the MOU between the United States and Israel and continued 
commitments to Egypt and Jordan.
  However, especially given the ongoing development in Egypt, through 
the region, and around the world, the drastic cuts in democratic 
governance, alternate development options, international financial 
institutions, conflict mitigation, reconciliation, disaster assistance, 
and global health, would significantly impede our ability to achieve 
our security objectives.
  I'm really disappointed with the Republican leadership's partisan 
approach because, as I mentioned, during my 4 years as chair of the 
subcommittee, I worked closely with my ranking member, and we did not 
include divisive social issues in our bills. Yet this CR would 
reinstate the global gag rule and prohibit funds for the United Nations 
Population Fund, denying millions of women family planning and basic 
health services.
  Finally, while all these measures are brought to the floor under the 
guise of

[[Page 1842]]

fiscal responsibility, in my judgment, they endanger our long-term 
economic security and fail to create jobs. So I urge my colleagues to 
oppose this bill.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Indiana (Mr. Pence), former chairman of the Republican Conference in 
the House.
  Mr. PENCE. I want to thank the distinguished chairman for yielding 
time and for his leadership on this and so many issues.
  After years of runaway Federal spending by both political parties, 
last year House Republicans took the pledge. We said to the American 
people, give us another chance to lead this Congress, and the first 
thing we'll do is we'll reduce domestic spending to pre-bail out, pre-
stimulus levels, saving the American people at least $100 billion. And 
today, simply put, this new majority will keep our word with the 
American people. And in Washington, D.C., that's saying a lot.
  Now we'll consider H.R. 1, which will save at least $100 billion in 
this fiscal year. It is, in fact, the single largest rescission package 
in the history of this Congress. With a $14 trillion national debt and 
a $1.5 trillion deficit this year, cutting $100 billion will not solve 
our fiscal crisis, but it's a good start, and it's a promise kept. And 
here in Washington, D.C., that's really saying something.
  Now, to save our Nation from an avalanche of debt facing future 
generations, we must just do a couple of basic things. First, we've got 
to stop what we've been doing, piling a mountain range of debt on our 
children and grandchildren. We've got to turn around and we've got to 
begin to head in the other direction. We have to face our present 
fiscal crisis squarely and with courage. And today, this new Republican 
majority will do just that. We'll begin the process of turning our ship 
of state back toward that horizon of fiscal responsibility and fiscal 
solvency and sustainability for generations to come.
  I urge my colleagues in both political parties, join us in this 
important first step. Join us in this important promise kept. Work with 
us, and we will work with you to put our Nation on a pathway toward 
fiscal solvency and, ultimately, lay a foundation for real economic 
growth for generations to come.

                              {time}  1510

  Mr. DICKS. I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished Democratic Whip, 
the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), who has been a longtime member 
of the Appropriations Committee and a very good friend.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  I would say to the previous speaker, my friend Mr. Pence, we did 
that. In 1993 we looked the fiscal posture of our country in the eye. 
We had sustained $1.4 trillion of deficit spending under Mr. Reagan and 
$1.1 trillion of deficit spending under Mr. Bush, and we put 
legislation on this floor and said we need to meet our fiscal 
responsibilities. Not a single member, unfortunately, of the Republican 
Party voted for that legislation. But over the next 8 years, we had a 
net surplus in this country; the only time in the lifetime of anybody 
in this body that that has happened. We did it working together.
  Unfortunately, the last administration ran up $3.8 trillion of 
deficit, and we inherited an economy that was in substantial free fall. 
The President said that; Mr. Bernanke said that; Mr. Paulson said that. 
And so we adopted legislation that tried to stabilize that economy, and 
the good news is that we have. We haven't gotten to where we want to 
be. We want to create more jobs. As the President says, we want to 
invest in growing our economy and bringing jobs back.
  There will be some very tough decisions we will have to make moving 
forward; and, frankly, as the chairman of the Appropriations Committee 
knows and as the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee knows, 
you will not get there focused simply on 14 percent of the budget. It 
will not happen, my friends.
  You might want to delude yourself or delude our constituents and say 
that you can simply cut all 14 percent of non-defense discretionary 
spending, and you will still have an operating deficit this year if we 
cut out every nickel of discretionary spending.
  That discretionary spending of course educates our children. It 
promotes our health. It promotes our commerce. It promotes building the 
economy. That's what this issue is about.
  The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield the gentleman 1 additional minute.
  Mr. HOYER. So I rise to say to all of us, all 435 of us, it will take 
courage, cooperation, and common sense to address the deficit situation 
that confronts us.
  And it is a crisis. It must be met. We do not have an alternative. 
Because if we do not address it--all of you have heard about my three 
children, my three grandchildren, and my one great granddaughter. All 
of them will hold me and all of you responsible for the legacy of 
fiscal irresponsibility which we will leave them.
  We now have bipartisan responsibility. You are in charge of this 
House; the Democrats are in charge of the Senate, and we have a 
President who is a Democrat. It is a perfect opportunity for us all to 
take responsibility and, yes, part of the blame, because the decisions 
we will have to make will be tough; they will be agonizing, and they 
will be wrenching. And people will say, We're not sure you should have 
done it.
  If we do it together, we can do it. And we owe it to our country, our 
fellow citizens, and our children to do so.
  Cutting spending is part of the solution to our deficit. But we also 
have to cut wisely, making the distinction between spending we can do 
without, and investments that are vital to our future growth.
  But Republicans have brought to the floor a spending bill full of 
cuts that are short-sighted and indiscriminate. They endanger the 
investments we need to grow our economy and create jobs--to out-build, 
out-innovate, and out-educate our competitors. When we talk about 
cutting those investments, we are talking about cutting tomorrow's 
jobs.
  I wish that my Republican colleagues would listen to the business 
leaders who understand the importance of thoughtful investment.
  Listen to Tom Donohue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Richard 
Trumka of the AFL-CIO, who don't agree on very much: ``Whether it is 
building roads, bridges, high-speed broadband, energy systems and 
schools, these projects not only create jobs . . . they are an 
investment in building the modern infrastructure our country needs to 
compete.''
  But the Republican spending bill would cancel 76 transportation 
projects in 40 States, and leave us with roads, bridges, and an air 
traffic control system stuck in the last century.
  Listen to Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.com: ``The number 1 thing 
the government needs to do is increase research funding.''
  But the Republican spending bill would cut support for 20,000 
researchers at the National Science Foundation, cut $1.4 billion of 
energy research, and cut $2.5 billion of medical research.
  Listen to Bill Gates: ``If we don't start innovating in education to 
make it better and more accessible . . . our competitiveness will fall 
behind that of other countries.''
  But the Republican spending bill would kick 200,000 children out of 
Head Start and make it harder for Americans to afford college.
  By all means, let's take real action on the deficit--but not in a way 
that sacrifices America's competitive edge.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. I yield 2 minutes to a new Member of 
Congress, a freshman and a new member of the Appropriations Committee, 
the gentleman from a wonderful place in Arkansas called Rogers, 
Arkansas (Mr. Womack).
  Mr. WOMACK. Mr. Chair, I am glad the gentleman a few minutes ago from 
Virginia talked about the mayors of America and the county judges of 
America, because just a few weeks ago I was one of those mayors.
  Twelve years ago, when I sought that office, I inherited a city that 
was in terrible deficit spending, that had unreasonable government 
intrusion into the private sector, that was affecting the economic 
well-being of that city.
  I am pleased to say that, because we took the position of putting our 
fiscal house in order and because we changed the way government 
approaches its involvement in the private sector and because we limited 
the dependency of our

[[Page 1843]]

city on the Federal Government that we created a city of excellence, 
that we significantly enhanced the quality of life. We did $1 billion 
worth of investment; we created thousands of jobs, and Rogers, 
Arkansas, is the example the American people are looking for today.
  I realize that these are difficult times. They are times that are 
going to require great courage, a sense of duty, and shared sacrifice 
in order to put America on the right path. I believe in this America, 
and that's the way forward.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield 1\1/3\ minutes to my good friend, the 
distinguished gentleman from California (Mr. Farr), who has now become 
the ranking member on Agriculture.
  Mr. FARR. Mr. Chair, I thank my ranking chair, the gentleman from 
Washington (Mr. Dicks).
  I rise with serious concerns. I am the ranking member of the 
Agricultural Appropriations Committee. I come from the State that is 
the leading ag State in the Nation, California, and agriculture is the 
number one economy in California. We're a State that is really 
diversified, and we do it without subsidies and we do it by 
partnerships.
  The partnership is essentially a public-private partnership, and 
there is a major role to be able to make the private sector successful 
with that partnership.
  We all care about feeding people, all people, whether they are rich 
or poor. One thing they all have in common is that they want that food 
to be safe. They want the drink to be safe. They want the drugs that 
they buy in the stores to be safe. And the problem with this CR, which 
is very interestingly talked about on their side in the generic of the 
necessity of cutting the deficit, which we all agree on. But to take a 
meat axe approach to the USDA and the FDA cuts the safety net for food 
and drugs.
  For example, the Food and Safety Inspection Service would have to cut 
down on their inspectors who have to be in every one of the 6,300 
slaughter and processing facilities. If they are not there, there is no 
work. We would have to close these facilities for months at a time; 
therefore, putting a lot of people out of work, less jobs, and 
certainly no food safety.
  It goes on and on and on. We need to argue these details, not just 
the generics.


               Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS)

  FSIS is responsible for the safety of domestic and imported meat and 
poultry. It inspects nearly 6,300 slaughter and processing facilities. 
Its inspectors are required to be present continuously during the 
operation of slaughter plants and to inspect every meat and poultry 
processing plant in the U.S. every day. All imported meat and poultry 
must also be inspected by FSIS. The Republican proposal would hold 
funding for FSIS to the 2008 level. The administration estimates that 
this would require a furlough of all FSIS employees, including all 
inspectors, for 30-47 working days (which amounts to 20-30 percent of 
the working days left in the fiscal year assuming enactment on March 
4th.) Without inspectors available, meat and poultry plants would be 
legally required to stop operating. The administration estimates the 
economic loss from stopping plant operations at $11 billion. It also 
expects that consumer prices for meat and poultry would rise with the 
curtailed supply. That's a lot of jobs and food--not only up 
unemployment but also drive--up prices.


                   Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  FDA is responsible for the safety of food, drugs, medical devices, 
human blood products, vaccines, cosmetics, and many other products. 
Consumers spend about 20 cents of every dollar on products regulated by 
FDA. The Republican proposal would fund FDA at about 10 percent below 
the 2010 level. Coming this late in the fiscal year, much deeper cuts 
would be necessary to end fiscal year 2011 at the level appropriated in 
the Republican bill. The administration has estimated that under the 
Republican proposal there would be 2,000 fewer FDA inspections of firms 
that manufacture food and medical products; 10,000 fewer FDA import 
inspections to verify that imported foods and medical products meet 
safety standards; and analysis of 6,000 fewer food and medical product 
samples to identify safety problems. In addition, this level will 
likely lead to furloughs and/or  * * *
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. I yield 2 minutes to the chairman of the 
Legislative Branch Subcommittee on Appropriations, the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Crenshaw).
  Mr. CRENSHAW. I thank the gentleman for all the work that he has done 
in helping to put this continuing resolution together.
  This is a giant step forward in stopping the culture of spending that 
has gone on here in this town for a long time and begins a culture of 
savings.
  In the subcommittee which I have been asked to chair, the Legislative 
Branch only deals with maybe one-half of 1 percent of all the money 
that we're talking about, but we didn't think that we ought to be 
immune to all the pain that goes on as well. In fact, I think, when 
times are tough, leaders ought to lead. And so we can help save 
taxpayers dollars by spending less money on ourselves, and that's what 
we do in this bill.
  We cut the accounts of the leadership offices. We cut the accounts of 
all the Members' offices. We cut the accounts of the committee staff 
and their offices. In fact, the Appropriations Committee, which Mr. 
Rogers chairs, will reduce their spending by 9 percent. So certainly 
Congress is taking the budget axe to its own spending and leading by 
example, and I think that's important.
  So as we move forward, Mr. Chairman, I think that we can do a whole 
lot more with a whole lot less around this place. We want to lead by 
example. That's what we're trying to do, and I think we are taking a 
giant step forward.
  Mr. DICKS. I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the distinguished gentleman from 
Georgia (Mr. Bishop). He has become the new ranking member on Military 
Construction and VA.

                              {time}  1520

  Mr. BISHOP of Georgia. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  While the Military Construction/VA portion of this bill is not cut as 
much as some other parts of the continuing resolution, the cumulative 
effect of this CR is really to hurt our veterans. The bill provides 
$74.2 billion, which is $2.4 billion below the FY 2010; $1.8 billion 
below the President's request.
  Mr. Chairman, it's time to end the theatrics and get to work. This 
continuing resolution continues the heated rhetoric. If this bill is 
signed into law, it will hurt our economic recovery, which in turn will 
affect our veterans. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more 
than 15 percent of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans are unemployed, 
far higher than the national jobless rate. If we follow through with 
some of these disastrous cuts, we'll see that rate go higher as the 
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan wind down and our troops come home 
seeking employment.
  For example, as the gentleman from North Carolina pointed out, we're 
cutting aid that local governments use to hire police officers. Many of 
our local police officers are veterans and they are hired with the 
community oriented policing grants. This will be eliminated. If we cut 
money for firefighters, this cut will have the same effect as cutting 
money from the cops. Our veterans will have nowhere to go to continue 
to serve their communities.
  We can do better than this bill. We must be serious because we have 
serious issues. Veterans have paid the price for the freedoms we enjoy 
in this country, but freedom is not free. It has been paid for with the 
lives and the limbs of countless men and women who have served this 
country in uniform. We owe them better than this.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from Wisconsin, a brand new Member of this body, Mr. Duffy.
  Mr. DUFFY. I thank the chairman for yielding time to me to address 
the issue today with regard to unspent, unobligated stimulus money.
  Two years ago, this Congress voted to spend nearly a trillion dollars 
of stimulus money. They said that we could borrow and spend our way to 
prosperity. Well, 2 years later we are well aware that borrowing and 
spending doesn't lead to economic prosperity, growth and sustainable 
jobs. We know it comes from the private sector--people who invest in 
their businesses and ideas. And from there, they

[[Page 1844]]

expand and grow. That's how we create jobs in this great country.
  Now we are stuck with a $14 trillion debt. This year, we're going to 
borrow $1.5 trillion. More borrowing, more spending, is going to lead 
to job-crushing taxes and passing this debt on to our next generation. 
It's unacceptable.
  I am encouraged that we are working on sending all unobligated 
stimulus money back to the Fed so we can pay down our debt.
  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to the 
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Fattah), the new ranking member of the 
Commerce-Science-Justice Subcommittee.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 1\1/4\ minutes.
  Mr. FATTAH. I thank the gentleman and I thank him for his 
extraordinary leadership on this critical matter.
  The Economic Policy Institute says that the GOP plan will cost our 
country 800,000 jobs. The parts of the CR that relate to Commerce, 
Justice and Science relate to essentially four areas.
  International trade assistance exports. The President has a major 
initiative to create American jobs through exporting. They want to cut 
it by $93 million.
  They want to cut $1.3 billion out of law enforcement. So if you need 
a cop and you call 911, there may or may not be one available because 
if it's one of the 1,300 that will be cut under this bill, they'll be 
gone.
  In legal services, some 80,000 cases reduced--for seniors who will be 
fighting mortgage foreclosure that would be fraudulent in their case, 
or domestic abuse violence in their homes, through cuts to legal 
services.
  And a $150 million cut for the National Science Foundation.
  Now my colleagues have a tough job. They're in the majority. They've 
got to make rational decisions. Let me just say this. If spending was 
bad, we would eliminate all spending. Some spending is necessary. We 
should be cutting waste. We should not be cutting law enforcement and 
legal assistance and scientific analysis, and we shouldn't be cutting 
export opportunities for American workers. And we shouldn't be risking 
800,000 jobs in our country; not today, not on any day.
  The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman from Washington has expired.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Frelinghuysen), the chairman of the 
Energy and Water Subcommittee on Appropriations.
  Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Mr. Chairman, some suggested some time ago that we have to wait until 
2012 or 2013 to make these decisions. We need to make these tough 
decisions now, to cut spending and to create a climate where the 
private sector can go hire workers.
  The Energy and Water Development section of this bill totals $29.9 
billion, an 11 percent reduction from fiscal year 2010. That's a tough 
decision. This level more truly represents what should be the top 
priorities of the Department of Energy, the Army Corps of Engineers, 
the Bureau of Reclamation, and the other accounts funded under our 
subcommittee's purview.
  Far from the ``meat axe'' approach that some have suggested we're 
taking in H.R. 1, our product is one of careful, thoughtful, line-by-
line analysis. We have looked at which programs are must-haves, which 
have significant unobligated balances, and which are redundant. Above 
all, we've ensured that the core national security mandate of the 
Department is adequately funded. Frankly, other countries' nuclear 
stockpile programs aren't taking a time-out while we wrestle with our 
budget challenges. The stewardship of the nuclear stockpile is the 
foremost responsibility of the Department of Energy. In fact, weapons 
activities and naval reactors receive the only increases in our bill.
  We do, however, make major reductions in the Department of Energy; 
major cuts. We eliminate all earmarks. That's close to $500 million, 
just in the Department of Energy. And we cut out programs like 
weatherization, with billions and billions of unspent stimulus money. 
In fact, the Department of Energy received close to $39 billion in 
stimulus money.
  Finally, we've cut back on programs like biological and environmental 
research that are not core to the Department's historical 
responsibilities and focus. We do all of this so the Department of 
Energy can focus on what we need to do--to support the private sector 
in developing the next round of energy-related intellectual property 
and the jobs associated with it.
  We need to do it. I support the CR. I think we ought to move on with 
it.
  Ms. SLAUGHTER. Mr. Chair, I rise today in support of the life-saving 
work done by Title X family planning providers across the nation.
  In 2009, five million men and women received important preventive 
services from family planning providers, including 2.3 million breast 
exams, 2.2 million tests for cervical cancer, and nearly 1 million HIV 
tests. The proposed cuts in H.R. 1 would eviscerate these services, 
reducing family planning and cancer prevention services. Cuts to family 
planning would have devastating consequences to families nationwide.
  Why is the Republican leadership attacking proven health care 
services, instead of working with us to create jobs? This legislation 
does not move our country forward.
  By attacking family planning and pursuing an extreme social agenda, 
Republicans are dividing our country and distracting from the very real 
economic problems facing our nation.
  While these cuts to family planning were proposed under the auspices 
of being ``fiscally responsible'', that is far from the truth.
  For every dollar invested in Title X family planning services, 
taxpayers save just under $4. By preventing cancer, identifying cancer 
in early stages, and preventing HIV/AIDS, Title X providers are saving 
money, as well as lives. Cutting family planning is not fiscally 
responsible, and will not reduce the bottom line.
  Moreover, this cut has nothing to do with ending funding for 
abortions, despite claims to the contrary. Title X family planning 
funds simply do not fund abortions. If we want to reduce the number of 
abortions in this country, the methodology is clear--empower women to 
prevent unintended pregnancies through education and access to 
contraception. And, that is precisely what family planning funding 
does.
  Nationwide, this cut will impact family planning services for 5 
million women and men. In my home state of New York, cuts to Planned 
Parenthood would impact 209,410 patients. Just last year, Planned 
Parenthood provided 70,490 screenings for cervical cancer in New York, 
detecting 7,931 abnormal results requiring medical action. Another 
67,957 women received breast exams. 138,501 tests for Chlamydia helped 
to avert the leading cause of preventable infertility in America today. 
New Yorkers stand to lose valuable health services.
  These statistics represent real women, with real needs. Can we turn 
our back on them? No, we cannot.
  We need to work together to invest in the services that will help our 
country to be successful. We must focus on building our economy, rather 
than eliminating health care services.
  Mr. POLIS. Mr. Chair, Americans' top priority is creating jobs. But 
six weeks into the 112th Congress, the Republican leadership has yet to 
bring a single, solitary jobs bill to the floor.
  Once again, we are here today to exercise one of our primary 
constitutional responsibilities as members of Congress--to pass 
appropriations legislation to fund the many basic and essential 
programs the federal governments, on which millions of Americans rely. 
Today is an incredible opportunity, for Republicans and Democrats to 
work together--to bridge the gap between parties and talking points--
and pass a bill that meets our shared goals of creating jobs, building 
our infrastructure, and strengthening our economy.
  Sadly, the Republican leaders have brought to the floor a continuing 
resolution that jeopardizes American jobs and our economic future by 
rolling back investments that will help our private sector grow and put 
people back to work. It thoughtlessly makes extreme cuts to appease an 
extreme wing of their party, at the expense of the American people.


                               Education

  Mr. Chair, building an excellent public education system that 
provides each and every child the opportunity to succeed is the single 
greatest investment we can make to secure our nation's future--an 
investment that I have devoted much of my life to support and achieve. 
From Preschool to K-12 to Higher Education, Republican cuts would 
undermine our global economic standing by denying opportunity to 
students, who depend on the government for their education.

[[Page 1845]]

  As President Obama said in his state of the union address, it's not 
just about ``how we cut'' but ``what we cut.'' Education is an 
investment in our future, and we can't sacrifice our future. But 
Republicans--through this CR--seem willing to sacrifice our future to 
meet their arbitrary campaign pledge.
  They want to drastically reduce quality preschool for poor children 
with a $1 billion cut in Head Start, which has shown positive results. 
For K-12 students, Republicans are proposing to dismantle a wide range 
of essential school supports--literacy programs; teacher improvements; 
math and science partnerships; arts in education; parent education; 
counseling; and graduation promotion.
  Their proposal would also slash special education services and 
college preparation. And many more students would be blocked from going 
to college if the Republicans had their way--with about half a billion 
dollars less for Pell grants for disadvantaged youth.
  Education is how America can reclaim our edge in job creation, in 
business leadership, in providing a livable wage, and in economic 
innovation. Destroying this promise by attempting to balance the budget 
on the backs of poor children and youth is both unwise and unjust.
  By cutting to the heart of the learning needs of America's children 
and youth through these extraordinary and nonsensical measures, 
Republican lawmakers clearly don't understand the meaning of investing 
in our future.


                              Environment

  This CR arbitrarily kills jobs, hurts the public health and is a slap 
in the face of environmental protection. The CR will set our country 
back decades by curtailing scientific research, simply because 
Republican's don't like what the science says. It puts our children's 
health at risk by handcuffing the EPA to police polluters and simply 
keeps us addicted to foreign oil and discourages clean energy 
innovations. This is sound bite politics at its worst, the American 
public needs real solutions and thoughtful policy.
  The CR prohibits any funding from being used to carry out the EPA's 
power plant pollution safeguard rules. These rules are tailored to only 
the biggest polluting power plants, ensuring average Americans and 
small business aren't affected by any regulations.
  The Clean Air Act guards the most vulnerable Americans--those with 
asthma and other lung disease, children, older adults, and people with 
heart disease and diabetes--from the dangers of airborne pollutants, 
including the threats from growing carbon dioxide pollution. Each year 
the Act prevents tens of thousands of adverse health effects, including 
asthma attacks, heart attacks and even premature death. This year 
alone, the Clean Air Act will save more than 160,000 lives, according 
to preliminary estimates by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 
Yet Republicans plan to starve this life-saving agency of its funding 
based on purely ideological reasons.


                              Immigration

  The CR would cut all funding for immigrant integration. Republicans 
claim that they support legal immigration and want to reward immigrants 
who waited in line and did things the right way. But then they go and 
cut funding to critical programs that help those legal immigrants 
become proud American citizens and better integrated into our 
communities. If Republicans really want to support legal immigrants, 
they wouldn't cut important programs that emphasize the value of 
learning English, learning American history and civics, and becoming 
U.S. citizens. Regardless of what side of the aisle you sit on, these 
are commonsense programs that we can all support.
  It would also cut overseas refugee assistance and admissions and 
domestic refugee assistance funding. These cuts would severely diminish 
our country's ability to help refugees across the globe. The victims 
would be some of the world's most vulnerable people: refugees fleeing 
religious persecution from Iran, political persecution from Burma, etc. 
We are the global leader in refugee resettlement. This is a proud 
American legacy and it makes us a shining beacon for the world. 
Haphazard cuts like this endanger refugees, but also America.
  If Republicans truly claim to be committed to deficit reduction, then 
why as they cut millions from beneficial programs like head start and 
LIHEAP, do they continue to increase defense spending? Until 
Republicans get serious about controlling defense spending--the largest 
part of the discretionary budget--they will never achieve their goals 
of reducing our deficit.


                              Local/US 36

  Mr. Chair, at the state and local level, my home state of Colorado is 
getting slapped in the face by this CR.
  A year ago, US 36--the highway that connects Boulder to Denver--was 
awarded a $10 Million TIGER/TIFIA Challenge Grant through the recovery 
Act--to expand one of the most used and heavily congested highways in 
the state, creating jobs and fostering economic development. The $10 
million federal investment helps leverage the additional funds in the 
area, creating $276 million in employment income and 7,200 jobs. The 
project impacts 191,000 corridor employees--10% of the state's 
employment.
  To date, only $900k has been obligated, and because the Republican CR 
rescinds all `unobligated' ARRA funding across the board without 
thought to details or individual projects--the many state, regional, 
and local transportation groups that have invested in the project will 
never see the remaining $9.1 million they were promised.
  For the businesses and residents in my district--this is a slap in 
the face.
  Colorado's US 36 Corridor project won the TIGER Award because it was 
one of the most innovative projects in the country. Mr. Chair, Rome 
wasn't built in a day and we can all agree that we should not be 
punishing innovation.
  Mr. Chair, the President's budget release yesterday is an excellent 
example of cutting back in nearly every aspect of the federal 
government, while investing in the future. We must tighten our belts 
and make hard choices and tough changes. But we cannot do so at the 
expense of growth and innovation.
  With cuts like these, Republican leadership has made it very clear 
that they're not interested in helping families to get ahead in this 
economy. Instead, they're holding our economic recovery and global 
competitiveness hostage in an attempt to meet an arbitrary spending 
goal, to appease the fringe of their party--the same people who 
advocate for cutting the Department of Education and privatizing social 
security.
  The Republican's continuing resolution before us today is sound bite 
politics at its worst. The American Public need and deserve real 
solutions and thoughtful policy. We can and must do better. I encourage 
my colleagues to oppose the rule for this CR as well as the underlying 
CR to prevent the irresponsible impact of this Republican spending 
bill.
  Mr. Conyer, the Majority introduced H.R. 1, the ``Full Year 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011,'' which will make immediate and 
drastic cuts to the federal budget.
  These mindless proposed cuts will hurt jobs, undermine public safety 
and law enforcement, and restrict fundamental civil liberties.
  Below is an itemization of some of the funding decreases to areas of 
the federal budget that are within the Judiciary Committee's purview--
the dollar references being the amounts less than the Administration's 
requested 2011 budget.

                         Department of Justice


              Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)

     Funding Decrease: $600 Million/Complete Elimination of Hiring 
       Program

  COPS has funded the hiring of more than 122,000 state and local 
police officers and sheriff's deputies in communities across America. 
The Republican funding cut means that 3,000 fewer officers will be 
hired or rehired to be on the streets of our neighborhoods.


                                  FBI

     Funding Decrease: $74 Million

  The Republican funding cut will delay construction of badly needed 
training facilities at the FBI Academy in Quantico. This will impact 
the FBI's effort to update and strengthen training for agents and 
intelligence analysts to maintain the fight against terrorism, sexual 
exploitation of children, drugs and other major threats to the U.S. 
from foreign and domestic sources.


 Violence Against Women Act, Victims of Crime Act, and Family Violence 
                   Prevention and Services Act (VAWA)

     Funding Decrease: $26.5 Million

  VAWA programs support victims of domestic and sexual violence. It 
also has saved $14.8 billion in its first 6 years. If the Republican 
funding cut tracks FY 2008 levels, VAWA programs would lose an 
estimated $170 million. Any cuts to these critical programs would 
undermine law enforcement and victim protection services.


                        General Legal Activities

     Funding Decrease: $111.3 Million

  DOD's principal divisions, including the Civil Rights Division, the 
Antitrust Division, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and 
Civil Division are funded under the category of general legal 
activities.
  The Civil Rights Division, which was chronically underfunded by the 
Bush Administration, will have to play a critical role with respect to 
how states and localities redraw their district lines following the 
decennial Census. As required under section 5 of the Voting Rights

[[Page 1846]]

Act, the Department of Justice will have to ``pre-clear'' all voting 
changes. The Civil Rights Division is expecting more than 800 
submissions this year and next.
  The Republican budget cut will generally undermine the ability of 
these divisions to protect the civil rights and interests of all 
Americans.


      Various State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Programs

     Funding Decrease: $525 Million

  These reductions eliminate or essentially gut proven crime prevention 
and crime reduction programs that localities have used to keep crime 
rates down. The inevitable result of these cuts will be increased crime 
and victimizations, more unemployment and more resulting expenditures 
than these cuts save in federal, state and local law enforcement 
activities, imprisonments and other costs.


                   National Drug Intelligence Center

     Funding Decrease: $10.6 Million

  The Center plays a major role in the fight against international and 
national illegal drug proliferation. The Republican funding cut will 
force the Center to furlough valuable employees, which will harm the 
Center's ability to fight the war on illegal drugs.


         Office of Justice Programs, Juvenile Justice Programs

     Funding Decrease: $191,095,000

  The JJP strengthens community safety and reduces victimization by 
setting standards and performance measures for the nation's juvenile 
justice systems, supporting delinquency prevention and early 
intervention, and contributing to the prevention and reduction of youth 
crime and violence.
  The inevitable result of the proposed Republican cut to BP funding 
will be increased crime and victimization; greater substance abuse; 
exacerbated mental health conditions; increased unemployment and 
incarceration; and a net increase in long-term costs to federal, state, 
and local governments.


                Law Enforcement Wireless Communications

     Funding Decrease: $71.6 Million

  This program provides critical support to law enforcement officers 
and agents in major metropolitan areas across the Nation in responding 
to terrorist attacks or other catastrophic incidents. The Republican 
funding cut will reduce by more than half the money used by the program 
to eliminate interoperability issues with wireless communications, 
thereby jeopardizing officer and public safety and the safety of 
millions of Americans.


                      U.S. Marshals Service (USMS)

     Funding Decrease: $9.7 Million

  The USMS is responsible for protecting judges which is critically 
important in light of recent threats to federal judges. The USMS also 
secures courthouse detention facilities that hold defendants accused of 
drug, gun and immigration crimes. The Republican funding cut will delay 
and possibly eliminate over $100 million in needed upgrades in security 
and construction of courthouse detention areas and facilities, the 
impact of which will be most acutely felt on the Southwest Border.

                           Federal Judiciary


                Salaries and Expenses; Defender Services

     Funding Decrease: $613 Million

  The Republican cut will force the federal courts to lay off more than 
2,400 support staff and to stop payments to attorneys who represent 
indigent criminal defendants, which may raise constitutional concerns 
about the availability of adequate criminal defense services. These 
cuts undermine public safety and the effective administration of 
justice at a time when criminal caseloads and the workloads of 
probation and pretrial services offices have reached an all-time high.

     Department of Homeland Security (DHS) anD Department of State

  H.R. 1 makes huge cuts in funding to DHS. Around $160 million are cut 
from accounts that are used to protect our Nation's borders and to 
facilitate legitimate trade and travel that are vital to our country 
and its recovering economy.


     DHS: Customs and Border Protection--Border Security Fencing, 
                     Infrastructure, and Technology

     Funding Decrease: $124.2 Million

  The $124.2 million cut from Border Security Fencing, Infrastructure, 
and Technology will jeopardize the Administration's plan to increase 
the use of technologies that have proven effective at securing our 
border. Such technologies include mobile surveillance units, thermal 
imaging devices, mobile radios, and the like. Tens of millions of 
dollars of cuts to Customs and Facilities Management will inhibit our 
ability to build needed Border Patrol stations and forward operating 
bases, and to modernize our severely outdated land ports of entry.


 DHS: Office of Citizenship, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

     Funding Decrease: Complete de-funding

  H.R. 1 eliminates all funding for the Office of Citizenship within 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. De-funding the Office and 
the President's Integration Initiative means that no grants will be 
available for programs that fund state agencies and non-governmental 
organizations to help prepare lawful permanent residents to apply for 
and obtain citizenship. This will increase the burden on cash-strapped 
state and local governments and decrease the provision of civics-based 
English language classes that help aspiring citizens integrate into 
their communities. The President's budget request in Fiscal Year 2011 
was only $18 million. This small investment has a big payoff: it 
assists immigrants to become proud, new American citizens who have 
studied English and the fundamentals of our government and who 
understand the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. The 
President's proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2012 increases this 
investment to $20 million. The President is heading in the right 
direction of working to integrate immigrants into our country. The 
Republican CR takes us in the wrong directly entirely.


         Department of State: Migration and Refugee Assistance

     Funding Decrease: $582 Million

  H.R. 1 cuts one-third of the funds for the State Department's 
Migration and Refugee Assistance program, which is used to protect 
refugees overseas and to admit refugees to the United States. This 
irresponsible and severe cut may seriously jeopardize our ability to 
protect the world's most vulnerable people-people fleeing persecution 
and torture. The cut will diminish our ability to support the critical 
work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and 
the International Committee of the Red Cross, who provide on-the-ground 
protection to refugees fleeing persecution. A cut like this could 
increase the risk of sexual violence for refugee women in camps. This 
cut also may jeopardize our ability to meet the President's goal of 
resettling 80,000 refugees in the U.S. this fiscal year. We are the 
global leader in refugee resettlement. This is a proud American legacy 
and it makes us a shining beacon for the world. Haphazard cuts like 
this endanger refugees, but also America.

                      Other Agencies and Programs


                    Legal Services Corporation (LSC)

     Funding Decrease: $85 Million

  LSC provides grants to support access to justice to our fellow 
Americans in need. The Republican cut would reduce LSC's funding by 
nearly 20%, which will result in a layoff of at least 370 staff 
attorneys in local programs, closure of many rural offices, and less 
civil access to justice for 161,000 Americans who will go without the 
services of an attorney. This includes women seeking safety for 
themselves and their children from domestic violence, veterans 
returning to civilian life without a job, and senior citizens trying to 
save their homes from foreclosure.


         Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS)

     Funding Decrease: $1.7 Million

  ACUS is a recently established independent agency designed to save 
millions in taxpayer dollars by recommending ways to improve and 
streamline the regulatory and rulemaking process. Even though 
Republicans claim they support the same goals, the Republican funding 
cut will gut ACUS. It will cut ACUS's funding by 53%, which will result 
in freezing all research grants and causing staff cuts and furloughs.


                  United States Patent Office (USPTO)

     Funding Decrease: $400 Million

  The USPTO examines and approves applications for patents on claimed 
inventions and administers the registration of trademarks. It also aids 
in the protection of American intellectual property internationally. 
The USPTO is fully funded by user fees paid by customers.
  The Republican funding plan limits USPTO to 2010 user fee projected 
levels, which will deprive the overburdened patent office of 
approximately $200 million it collects in fees, and an additional $200 
million from a fee surcharge and supplemental amount in the 2011 
budget.
  This will exacerbate the over 700,000 application backlog the USPTO 
currently faces, prevent needed upgrades in technology to insure 
quality patents, and freeze hiring of additional examiners. Many of the 
improvements recently initiated to increase efficiency and decrease 
backlog will have to be abandoned. Of

[[Page 1847]]

the 700,000 patents pending, many are in the health related field or 
involve technological advancement.
  The proposed cut will stymie private sector patent reliant 
industries, undercut job growth and creation and further delay the 
development of potentially life-saving pharmaceuticals, as well as 
other technological improvements.


              Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

     Funding Decrease: $1.6 Million

  Established on the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, the purpose 
of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is to establish a 
watchdog group within the Executive Office of the President to help 
maintain an appropriate balance between national security and civil 
liberties.


                      Periodic Census and Programs

     Funding Decrease: $72.9 Million

  The Census Bureau is in the process of completing the decennial 
census as required by the Constitution. The results of the census will 
be used to enforce the requirements of the Voting Rights Act and the 
constitutional doctrine of ``one person, one vote.'' Curtailing the 
work of the Census at this moment would be injurious to the protection 
of the right to vote.


     Election Assistance Commission and Federal Election Commission

     Funding Decrease: $6 Million

  These commissions safeguard the election process, promote 
transparency, fight corruption, and protect our citizen's right to 
vote. The Republican budget cut undermines this critical process and 
fundamental right.


                        Family Planning Title X

     Funding Decrease: $317 Million

  Title X is the nation's cornerstone family-planning program for low-
income women. Currently, this program receives $317 million. H.R. 1 
would eliminate all funding for this essential program.

                         Restrictive Provisions


                    Reinstatement of Global Gag Rule

  H.R. 1 would reinstate the global gag rule that bars USAID funds from 
overseas health centers unless they agreed not to use their own, non-
U.S. funds for abortion services. President Obama repealed this harmful 
Bush-era policy during his first week in office, after eight years 
during which thousands of women and families in need of public-health 
services were turned away from underfunded clinics.
  H.R. 1 also contains various restrictive riders, including:
  1. a restriction on court review of regulations intended to protect 
endangered grey wolves
  2. a restriction on the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to 
regulate greenhouse gases and clean water
  3. a restriction that forbids the transfer of Guantanamo Bay 
detainees to the United States for prosecution
  This substantial list gives an idea of the broad-ranging adverse 
impact that these Republican cuts would impose on job growth, public 
health and safety, and basic American values that we should all hold 
dear. I hope that we can take a more sensible approach to the budget 
than the draconian and ill-conceived cuts contained in H.R. 1.
  Mr. BENISHEK. Mr. Chair, it is my strong belief that the pre-eminent 
reason a majority of Northern Michigan's citizens selected me to be 
their representative in Washington was to do everything possible to 
rein in out-of-control Federal spending. My focus has been to support 
such efforts while working to ensure that policies coming out of the 
Nation's Capital--tax, monetary, and regulatory--serve to encourage 
private enterprise so Northern Michigan has the chance to experience 
economic growth.
  My first 44 days in office have taught me a great deal about the 
budget process and the ``spending ways of Washington.'' Each day we 
have been in session I have typically had 5-10 meetings with 
organizations, companies and Washington reps all seeking to keep their 
programs free of any spending cuts. No one in Washington has asked me 
to spend less. In fact, it seems in every Washington meeting while 
there occasionally is a recognition of the doom America faces if the 
current spending continues, each meeting usually closes with an 
expected refrain ``. . . yes we need to spend less but not our 
program.''
  By contrast, during my first visit home, just about everyone in the 
First District asked me to make sure the Federal Government spends 
less. In Northern Michigan there seems to be a strong consensus that 
Federal budget red ink can no longer continue at record pace.
  Here are my guiding ``spend less'' principles in this 112th Congress:
  Shared Responsibility: Before there is any comprehensive entitlement 
reform effort, every Federal department should be prepared to live with 
less money in 2012 than it received in 2011.
  Sunlight and Transparency: All spending decisions should be made in a 
fully transparent legislative process. No backdoor earmarks, no special 
interest amendments. If a program has merit its supporters should 
defend the program in public floor debate.
  Tighten the Revenue Spigot: Simply sending more money to Washington 
is not going to solve the problem of unchecked spending; every year the 
U.S. Treasury receives more money; every year the Federal Government 
spends more than it takes in. Consequently, increasing taxes is not the 
answer.
  If not now, when? I have publicly promised to limit my career in 
Congress to just three terms. America's future is more important than 
any one of us in Congress, certainly more important than any political 
job. I'd rather do what I think is right than simply keep this 
position. I trust the voters.
  In my view, the debt is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. 
It is an American issue.
  The failure of previous Congresses to act means America now faces a 
$14 trillion debt. For every dollar Congress allocates the U.S. 
Treasury has to borrow up to $.40 to pay for it. That means indebting 
ourselves to countries like China and mortgaging our children's future.
  Let me be clear, this will not be easy. To stem the tide, many tough 
decisions will need to be made. Northern Michigan--like the entire 
country--has a backlog of worthy projects and its people have benefited 
from admirable public programs. The reductions in H.R. 1 affect every 
community in the nation. These are hard decisions for Congress to make, 
and not everyone will be happy with everything that has been proposed. 
This is understandable, but I believe these reductions are necessary to 
show that Congress is serious about returning our country to a 
sustainable financial path.
  The Continuing Resolution to be considered on the House Floor this 
week is just the first step. Fortunately, the President's budget 
proposal is merely a suggestion that Congress can improve upon. In my 
view, Congress needs to offer a more fiscally sound budget for FY 2012.
  Additionally, it is my view that Congress will need to consider 
reforming entitlements programs. Social Security and Medicare are 
important programs that millions of Americans depend on. Without 
reform, both of these programs face bankruptcy. In my opinion, Congress 
needs to consider solutions to avoid this crisis that ensures benefits 
under Social Security and Medicare are not reduced for those Americans 
currently receiving benefits.
  And I think most of my colleagues agree this is not a time to play 
politics. The inflamed rhetoric and scare attacks on cutting grandma's 
benefits have no place here. This week's vote will not take away 
benefits for anyone receiving benefits. Instead, Congress will have 
completed the first step and as the Constitution dictates, the Senate 
and the President will have their say.
  Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the Department of 
Defense Mentor-Protege Program. This successful program was created in 
fiscal year 1990 to develop the technical capabilities of small 
disadvantaged businesses by allowing major contractors to transfer and 
develop technology with them. The Mentor-Protege Program has been 
essential to diversifying our defense supplier industrial base by 
expanding the number of qualified small businesses that can 
realistically compete for DOD contracts.
  Current estimates show that protege businesses make up 12 percent of 
all small disadvantaged business awards from DOD. However, a sunset 
clause in the original bill set the program to expire in 2010, and 
language extending the authorization to 2015 was removed from the FY11 
National Defense Authorization Act. At a time when our small businesses 
and defense industrial base are both struggling, this program, which 
has a successful track record, is a critical tool for keeping our 
defense industrial base and our national security strong. I look 
forward to working with my colleagues in the House to ensure we 
reauthorize this critical program in fiscal year 2012.
  Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California. Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition 
to H.R. 1. While I agree with my Republican colleagues that we need to 
address our nation's deficit, the budget cuts being proposed would do 
more harm than good for our economy. Specifically, the legislation's 
cuts to science and technology research would impair our ability to 
compete globally.
  H.R. 1 would dramatically reduce investments in the Department of 
Energy's Office of Science, the National Science Foundation (NSF) and 
the National Institute for Standards

[[Page 1848]]

and Technology (NIST). These agencies conduct cutting-edge science and 
technology research that keeps America innovative and competitive. The 
budget cuts will not only create significant job losses today but also 
stagnate our economic growth in the future.
  As a resident of Silicon Valley, I know firsthand what investments in 
science research and development can do for our economy, and I urge my 
colleagues to join me in opposing H.R. 1.
  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, Congressional Republicans often assert that 
their aggressive budget cutting is in line with the desires of the 
American people. The cuts Republicans propose for the remainder of 
Fiscal Year 2011 include eliminating support for homeless veterans, 
cutting nearly a billion dollars from programs for law enforcement and 
first responders, and gutting environmental protections that keep our 
air, water and food safe. As House Republicans continue their march to 
weaken our communities, kill jobs, and make our most vulnerable 
citizens bear the burden for tax cuts for the wealthiest citizens, 
there is another target for cutting--the Corporation for Public 
Broadcasting, CPB.
  In this bill, House Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers (R-KY) is 
working to eradicate all funding for CPB and eliminate federal support 
for public media. This attack on unbiased reporting, cultural 
programming, and educational television and radio would have dire 
consequences in my home State for Minnesota Public Radio and Twin 
Cities Public Television, not to mention the Minnesota taxpayers who 
rely on public broadcasting every day.
  CPB's funding is directed to local public broadcasting stations, 
which provide commercial-free, high-quality programming to millions of 
Americans every day. Public broadcasting outlets target underserved 
audiences, children, minorities, and low-income Americans with non-
biased news and cultural programming.
  Public broadcasting is one of the most valuable community assets, and 
it is a prime example of the numerous benefits that come from 
investment from the federal government. Every month, over half of all 
Americans utilize public broadcasting--170 million people--through 368 
public television stations, 943 radio stations, and hundreds of online 
services. Federal funding for CPB costs $1.35 per American ever year, 
while the rest of the funding comes from private donations. Public 
broadcasting is a vital educational resource for teachers, parents, and 
children.
  In addition to providing a valuable community good, a majority of 
Americans value public media and advocate that the federal government 
continue its support. Last year, Americans rated public broadcasting as 
an ``excellent'' use of taxpayer dollars, coming in second to defense 
spending. Eighty percent of those who were surveyed believe that 
funding for public broadcasting is money ``well spent.''
  A vote in support of CPB funding is a vote for the American people. 
Public broadcasting is what our citizens want, and Chairman Rogers and 
the rest of the Republicans should listen.
  Members from the Fourth District have contacted me to speak out in 
support of public broadcasting and against this egregious attack.
  A St. Paul student, age 14, just called me today to tell me that she 
is the voice of the future and very supportive of the Corporation for 
Public Broadcasting.
  A resident from St. Paul told me, ``Thank you for standing up for 
public broadcasting. You are right when you say the Tea Party would 
like nothing better than to eliminate the one place where we go to find 
balanced reporting. I am a sustaining member of both public television 
and radio and find it to be a source of hope in this media-fallow 
country.''
  A college student in St. Paul wrote me to say, ``I am deeply 
concerned about proposed legislation in the House that would eliminate 
federal funding for PBS and NPR. It is vital to our country and our 
public discourse that we have some forms of independent journalism that 
are unbiased and free from corporate interests. Not only does public 
media provide a trusted news and entertainment source for adults around 
the Nation, but the educational children's programming helps get 
youngsters from all backgrounds off to a good start. I grew up watching 
Sesame Street, Mr. Rogers, and Nova on what was then Channel 2 (now 
TPT). Now, as a college student at the University of Minnesota-Morris, 
I still depend on PBS and NPR every day. I fear that cuts to federal 
funding for public media will have an especially adverse effect on 
smaller and rural stations, like Pioneer Public TV, which are more 
dependent on federal money. It pains me to imagine a time when public 
media isn't available to future generations of Americans as a source of 
nonpartisan information available to all.''
  Another St. Paul resident said, ``I am a current supporter of the MN 
TPT, and would hate to see this wonderful service eliminated because 
someone in Congress thinks it is unnecessary. Many people can't afford 
cable or satellite television--I can only afford the lowest basic 
service--and the programming on TPT is educational, entertaining and 
innovative. Please fight to keep the funding! Thank you!''
  As you can see, residents of the 4th District of Minnesota are strong 
supporters of this essential service. Federal support for CPB keeps our 
citizens informed, educates our children, and makes our communities 
stronger. I will fight against these ``dumb-cuts'' because Minnesota 
Public Radio and Twin Cities Public Television are critical community 
assets that deserve federal support.
  Given Republicans' frantic attempts to slash federal spending in even 
the most detrimental ways, eliminating CPB is a very real possibility. 
In my position on the House Appropriations Committee, I will do 
everything in my power to prevent public broadcasting stations 
nationwide from being forced to shut their doors, but I cannot do it 
alone. I urge my colleagues to protect this valuable public good and 
vote against H.R. 1.
  Ms. RICHARDSON. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to Sections 1628 
through 1634, and 1648 of the bill, which cuts funding to the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
  I oppose these provisions because they are unwise, irresponsible, and 
undermine our nation's ability to prepare, respond, or mitigate natural 
and man-made disasters and terrorist attacks. In short, I oppose the 
bill because it puts the security of our homeland at risk.
  This bill that the Republicans are bringing to the floor today is 
reckless not only to our economy and American workers, but also to our 
national security.
  The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 revealed the catastrophic 
consequences of the inability of first responders, fire, police, and 
rescue personnel to communicate with each other via radio during 
emergencies.
  Communication glitches also occurred during the response to Hurricane 
Katrina. Yet the Republicans want to terminate grants for interoperable 
emergency communications. Have we not learned anything from the 
communications failure during 9/11?
  These draconian cuts will put our first responders at risk and slow 
down the response to terrorist attacks and natural disasters. I cannot 
in good conscience accept these cuts to interoperable emergency 
communications.
  The irresponsible Republican plan also put our nation's fire fighting 
ability at risk. I am from California and we know about fires. The bill 
eliminates the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant 
program, (SAFER), which is why it is strongly opposed by the 
InternationalAssociation of Fire Fighters (IAAF).
  The IAAF estimates that these cuts will result in the loss of 5,200 
jobs on top of the 5,000 fire fighter jobs lost since 2008. These cuts 
will put our communities at risk.
  The City of Compton in my district is home to an Emergency Operations 
Center operated by FEMA. My district is also home to several major oil 
refineries, gas treatment facilities, and petro chemical facilities. 
California's 37th Congressional District is also home to the Port City 
of Long Beach and is located on the outskirts of Los Angeles. A 
centralized emergency response center is vital to my district and the 
surrounding communities.
  This Republican job-destroying continuing resolution seeks to 
eliminate these Emergency Operations Centers. Not only will the 
elimination of these centers result in the loss of jobs, they will put 
my constituents and other Americans across the country at risk. This 
Emergency Operations Centers are needed to coordinate the necessary 
resources during an emergency.
  I cannot support depriving first responders, firefighters, and police 
officers of the tools needed to respond to public emergencies, natural 
or man-made. Why would we want to risk a repeat of the disaster we 
witnessed in the response to Hurricane Katrina? How are we better off 
by depriving our first responders the ability to communicate with each 
other during an emergency? It defies common sense.
  Terrorists that are trying to attack our country are modifying their 
techniques to try to find our nation's vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, 
the Republican's bill reduces Federal, State, and tribal capabilities 
to secure our nation against terrorist and other catastrophic threats. 
This bill also diminishes our ability to protect our borders and 
significantly scales back our ability to detect chemical, biological, 
radiological, and nuclear threats.
  Mr. Chairman, H.R. 1 continues the Republican avoidance of bringing 
job creation bills to the floor. Since the Republican's have been in 
control of the House, they have not brought one job creating bill to 
the floor. Not one.

[[Page 1849]]

Worse, the bill before us today will actually kill jobs. Thousands of 
Americans will lose jobs under this Republican bill. Instead of our 
keeping our economy moving forward as was the case during the Clinton 
Administration and during the 111th Congress, this bill will reverse 
the economic progress we have seen for the last several months.
  I urge my colleagues to vote against H.R. 1. Let's work together to 
ensure our first responders have the tools and resources needed to 
respond to natural and man-made disasters and terrorist attacks.
  Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chair, I rise today in strong 
opposition to H.R. 1, which takes America a step backward, jeopardizes 
our fragile economic recovery, and does absolutely nothing to create 
jobs.
  This funding plan leaves American working families behind.
  You'll hear promises of ``fiscal discipline'' and ``down payment on 
the debt'' from my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, but these 
promises are empty. This bill does little more than strike at the heart 
of critical programs that invest in our communities, our workers, and 
our children.
  Moreover, by irresponsibly taking a slash and burn approach to budget 
cutting, this bill fails to present a thoughtful blueprint that we can 
use to slowly but surely chip away at the budget deficit while still 
allowing us to out-educate, out-innovate, and out-build our foreign 
competitors.
  We often compare building the federal budget to balancing a family 
budget. There are certainly some relevant similarities. But I know one 
thing, if I found my family's budget in as serious trouble as the 
federal budget, I would not simply take a machete to my various 
expenditures.
  I would carefully study them, and continue most or all of my 
productive and useful investments while eliminating unnecessary items 
and carefully paring back in other areas until I knew enough about how 
the cuts would affect my future income.
  Would a family with money troubles immediately pull their children 
out of college? I don't think so. Then why does this proposal reduce 
Pell grants that make college more affordable and kick 200,000 children 
out of Head Start?
  Why does it reduce investments in science research, job-creating 
high-speed rail, and the popular COPS program to assist local police?
  Why does it cut worker training when unemployed Americans--especially 
those in places like Lynwood and South Gate in my district--need new 
skills now more than ever?
  It is shameful that the House Republican Majority proposes to 
eliminate a program for homeless veterans, those who have selflessly 
served our nation.
  Certainly, to get the federal budget on the path toward balance, we 
must find cuts we can all agree on. Tough decisions will have to be 
made. But these are not those cuts. Just as our economy is starting to 
recover is no time to leave our children, our veterans, or our workers 
behind.
  I urge my colleagues to oppose this funding bill and reject its 
priorities. We must do better for American families.
  Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Mr. Chair, I rise to speak against language 
in the underlying bill that would prevent HUD from spending money on a 
Sustainable Communities Initiative. The language in the bill would end 
a very successful HUD program that has helped communities plan for 
growth and halt a successful partnership between HUD, DOT, and EPA that 
promotes redevelopment and new transportation infrastructure. 
Secretaries Donovan, LaHood, and Administrator Jackson and their 
agencies have spent the last year cutting red tape and coordinating 
investments to meet multiple economic, environmental, and community 
objectives. Northern Virginia is already benefitting from these 
investments, by winning a TIGER grant to expand bus service 
dramatically, including in the congested I-95 and Route 7 corridors. 
The Sustainable Communities Initiative actually represents a 
conservative principle, because it emulates longstanding efforts by 
developers and local governments around the country. In Northern 
Virginia, Fairfax and Arlington counties have led the way with Transit 
Oriented Development years before the Federal Government figured it 
out. In Northern Virginia, developers led the way with visionary 
replanning proposals for Tysons Corner Center Mall, Merrifield Town 
Center, and numerous other Transit-Oriented Development proposals. 
These grants go to communities all around the country, large and small, 
urban and rural. The interest in these has been extraordinary. In 2010, 
when HUD announced their challenge grants, to be awarded jointly with 
DOT, a total of 630 communities requested $1.2 billion in funding. HUD 
was able to award 61 grants worth $69 million. HUD's sustainable 
communities regional planning grants were as popular: 225 regions 
applied for $450 million, and HUD was able to award 45 regions a total 
of $98 million. It is high time the Federal Government emulated our 
local efforts in Northern Virginia, and I therefore strongly oppose 
Republican efforts to repeal this program and prevent federal support 
of our local programs.
  Mr. FARR. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the dangerous and 
irresponsible cuts to the State and Foreign Operations budget. This 
short-sighted budget slashing generates petty savings at the expense of 
America's long-term national security and economic growth.
  There are no two ways about it: Our national security depends on 
investments in development, diplomacy, and defense. As Department of 
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said, ``The challenges confronting 
our nation can't be dealt with by military means alone.'' But this 
legislation and many of the amendments to it are tone deaf to this 
common sense.
  Mr. Speaker, this fiscal negligence will come back to haunt us if we 
cripple our efforts to prevent conflict, promote rule of law, and 
support the creation of stable allies.
  I am particularly upset that the Peace Corps, one of our government's 
most cost-effective tools of peacebuilding, is slashed by $70 million. 
Do you know what Peace Corps could do with that money? Send 1,400 
Americans to high-priority countries in the Middle East, Africa, and 
around the globe to work on critical projects like education, 
agricultural development, and HIV/AIDs relief, while promoting goodwill 
towards America.
  Similarly, I am concerned about amendments to defund the U.S. 
Institute of Peace. Our country is fighting a multi-billion dollar war. 
And as General Petraeus affirmed, USIP works closely with the military 
in both Afghanistan and Iraq to promote on-the-ground peacebuilding 
efforts and bring an end to conflict. Yet, as my colleagues propose to 
increase funding for the war, some have also proposed to eliminate 
funding for USIP, the only independent government actor that is 
dedicated solely to conflict prevention and resolution. That makes 
absolutely no economic sense.
  Rather than make smart investments in civilian instruments of 
security, this bill and a lot of the amendments to it cut many other 
excellent foreign assistance programs with strong returns on 
investment. These include international family planning, poverty and 
infectious disease alleviation, and the Inter-American Foundation.
  As Secretary Gates said, ``Development is a lot cheaper than sending 
in soldiers.'' If we want to be better stewards of taxpayer dollars, 
then why are we ripping resources away from the low-cost, high-return 
international programs that create strategic alliances and prevent 
multi-billion dollar wars?
  The foreign aid budget is less than two percent of our total federal 
budget. This boils down to about $126 per American. That's about $100 
bucks less than an army service uniform. So, for just $126 a head, 
America remains the beacon of democracy in the world. Now, that makes 
good economic sense.
  Our job in this body is to serve the American people. But what kind 
of public servants are we if we vote to jeopardize America's national 
security so we can save a few bucks this year?
  These cuts to foreign assistance masquerade as fiscal responsibility. 
But the reality is that this is a short-sighted proposal that endangers 
our long-term security, stability, and economic health. I strongly 
oppose this misguided legislation.
  Mr. REYES. Mr. Chair, I rise today to express my strong opposition to 
the significant cuts to community health centers included in this bill. 
The Continuing Resolution proposes to reduce funding to community 
health centers by $1 billion, a nearly sixty percent reduction from 
FY2010 levels. Over the past few years, millions of families lost their 
health insurance due to job losses, and they now depend on community 
health centers to receive health care. If these cuts are signed into 
law, 192,834 people in Texas alone would lose access to health care.
  These cuts are especially harmful to the people of my district. 
Border communities face unique health concerns and challenges, and 
community health centers play a critical role. The cuts will have 
devastating effects on the communities and patients who most need 
access to care--patients with diabetes, heart disease, and HIV/AIDS, as 
well as children and pregnant women. Community health centers provide 
access to quality health care to those who would otherwise forgo a 
doctor's visit or seek treatment in an emergency when it's too late.
  In my congressional district for example, Centro San Vicente, one of 
many community health centers, provides health services for over 10,000 
people a year. The irresponsible

[[Page 1850]]

cuts contained in the Continuing Resolution will merely shift the 
burden to local communities, such as the district I represent, where 
local property taxpayers have already spent more than $500,000,000 
since 1998 to pay for those who could not afford to pay for health care 
at our public hospital.
  Republicans cannot merely ignore the problems that arise when 50 
million people in the United States lack basic health coverage. They 
have voted to repeal the health insurance reform law, and now want to 
cut the very clinics that help lower health care costs by encouraging 
uninsured patients to seek treatment in a doctor's office, not in an 
emergency room, where the costs are substantially higher.
  I understand the need for fiscal discipline, but drastically funding 
to a cost-effective program that has improved countless lives makes 
little sense from both a moral and fiscal perspective.
  I urge my colleagues to vote against this bill which strips funding 
for community health centers.
  Ms. BORDALLO. Mr. Chair, I rise today to oppose the drastic and 
reckless cuts my colleagues in the Majority have included in H.R. 1. 
This legislation includes cuts that will destroy jobs, pollute our 
environment, damage our schools, threaten public safety and impact 
nearly every aspect of our economy. They will not strengthen our 
nation, they will negatively impact our natural resources and inhibit 
future generation's ability to compete and innovate in the global 
economy.
  Specifically, H.R. 1 would reduce NOAA's operating budget by more 
than $450 million dollars, severely diminishing NOAA's ability to 
protect marine ecosystems, manage our nation's fisheries and provide 
weather monitoring data to weather sensitive industries. In addition, 
it will cut programs that provide life-saving services in every state 
and district. These irresponsible cuts will jeopardize thousands of 
jobs, threaten public safety and have lasting effects on our national 
and regional economies.
  Of particular concern to coastal regions like Guam, are threats to 
coral reef ecosystems and the fisheries and tourism industries they 
support. The US commercial fisheries industry alone accounts for more 
than $100 billion in annual sales and supports 1.5 million jobs, while 
the coastal recreation and tourism industry serves as one of the 
nation's largest employers. These industries are critical to the long-
term economic success of coastal regions however they are significantly 
threatened by coral reef degradation due to pollution, and climate 
change. Without healthy coral reefs, fishery levels plummet, and 
tourism declines.
  Reducing NOAA's operating budget will further jeopardize these 
important industries. Without sufficient funding, NOAA cannot 
adequately protect our coral reef resources and could be forced to 
reduce public access to National Marine Sanctuaries and other 
recreational areas. In addition, H.R. 1 would significantly deteriorate 
NOAA's law enforcement abilities against illegal, unregulated and 
unreported fishing. The weakening of these programs would cause both 
immediate and long term job losses within the commercial fisheries and 
tourism industries. I strongly oppose all proposed cuts to NOAA's 
operating budget, it is too important to our economy and preserving our 
marine resources for future generations.
  Another reckless cut included in H.R. 1 is more than $217 million to 
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and 
Agriculture (NIFA). NIFA provides critical grants to universities 
around the nation, supporting food and agriculture research promoting 
economic growth and environmental protections. The research yields 
national value and is especially significant to food security, 
nutritional health, and increased agricultural production.
  Specifically important to Guam, is the Tropical and Subtropical 
Research program, T-STAR. In 2010, the T-STAR program supported 46 
research projects at the University of Florida, the University of 
Hawaii, the University of Puerto Rico, the University Guam, the 
University of the Virgin Islands, and at American Samoa Community 
College. These projects are critical to sustainable agriculture, pest 
control, and disease research. Funds provided by T-STAR are leveraged 
by a commitment of local resources, further improving public health, 
protecting agro-ecosystems, and saving taxpayer dollars over time. They 
offer a high yield on investment and funding for the NIFA and T-STAR 
programs should be made a priority. I strongly oppose the majority's 
irresponsible cuts to these programs.
  Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the amendment offered 
by Mr. Stearns, an amendment which seeks to hamstring the EPA's ability 
to do its job.
  A job which Congress determined was the responsibility of the EPA.
  A job which the Supreme Court ruled was the responsibility of the 
EPA.
  And, a job, which is necessary to save thousands of lives, and 
millions in healthcare costs.
  Contrary to what some of my colleagues have been saying on the House 
floor, Americans support the mission of the EPA.
  Americans also support the tenets of the Clean Air Act.
  Recently, polls have been conducted in Congressional districts across 
the country, in districts that are home to coal and power plants, that 
are in the heart of steel towns and industry.
  When questioned, 60 and 70 percent of people in these districts 
answered with a resounding, ``yes, the EPA can and should do more to 
hold polluters accountable and to protect our land, air and water.''
  Those same folks did not support Congress deciding how those rules 
should be promulgated, as this amendment strives to do.
  There's a reason that rules are written by agencies--they've got the 
resources, and the knowledge, to write regulations that will do what's 
best for American citizens and communities.
  Our job is to support these rules.
  I stand here in support of the EPA, the EPA's ability to regulate 
coal combustion wastes and against the proposed amendment.
  Our lives depend on it.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chair, America has always been at the 
forefront of medical innovation--with the National Institutes of Health 
(NIH) making us the leader at creating life-saving technology.
  Millions of Americans live healthier, more productive lives as a 
result of our medical research funding
  The innovative and cutting-edge research funded by the NIH has also 
given the United States thousands of good jobs and contributed to 
creating a strong middle class.
  Now we're voting on a budget that will cut over $1.5 billion from one 
of the key engines of American innovation.
  H.R. 1 is a set back to medical research and a set back to our 
economic recovery.
  Vote for amendment number 213 to preserve critical NIH funding.
  Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Chair, I rise today with an amendment that would, 
quite simply, allow the President to continue to consult an Advisor on 
Energy and Climate Change.
  Section 1535 of this bill, which forbids the President from hiring 
such an advisor, wouldn't save taxpayers a penny.
  Section 1535, which my amendment would strike, is a misguided attempt 
to tell the President who he can and cannot consult.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask you, would any member of this body allow us to 
deny them counsel on energy and climate issues?
  This is NOT a rhetorical question--every member of this body that 
employs a staffer on energy or climate issues should carefully consider 
whether they would deny the President that same counsel.
  Whether or not you agree with the President on energy and climate 
issues, I would ask you--is it appropriate to silence those with whom 
you disagree?
  I would also remind my colleagues that Section 1535 of this bill, 
which my amendment would strike, does not save taxpayers any money at 
all--not even a penny.
  All it does is deny the President the ability to consult with a 
certain type of advisor.
  Section 1535 is an unprecedented intrusion into the President's 
ability to retain and consult advisors on issues of national 
importance.
  And energy and climate change are issues of national importance.
  In light of recent catastrophes like the BP oil spill, ongoing 
efforts to prevent the EPA from doing its job, and rising rates of 
mortality and morbidity due to unhealthy air, land, and water--it is 
more important than ever that we support increased resources for the 
President and the Administration to do their job of keeping us, and our 
environment, safe and healthy.
  I've stood on this House floor many times, some of them in recent 
days, and talked about decreasing wasteful government spending.
  I've written whitepaper reports, both in Congress and while a Cook 
County Commissioner, detailing the importance of streamlining and 
reinventing government.
  But, the crux of those arguments is predicated on the fact that I 
believe that what the government does matters--that government's 
mission matters.
  What we do here today, and tomorrow, and the day after that, matters.
  But this CR, which combines ideologically driven cuts with pretend 
cuts, like Section 1535, is not the answer.
  Taking a sledgehammer to non-defense discretionary spending is not 
the answer.

[[Page 1851]]

  We've got to talk about what programs are working and support them at 
the same time we cut the ones that don't work.
  We're facing a climate crisis--a climate crisis that has become 
political and polarizing, pushing leaders into opposite corners of this 
debate.
  But the facts aren't a debate if they're based on science.
  And science says that for decades and centuries to come we're going 
to be dealing with rising temperatures, acidic oceans, extinct species, 
and skyrocketing healthcare costs due to dirty air.
  In these trying times, we're trying to tell the President of the 
United States he doesn't have the right to counsel on energy and 
climate change?
  With all due respect, Section 1535 is an unserious attempt to achieve 
some measure of fiscal responsibility.
  But the truth is, it hacks away at the constitutional separation of 
powers and doesn't save taxpayers any money at all.
  How we address energy and climate change issues will matter for our 
children, and our children's children.
  We must not hamstring our ability to do so.
  I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
  Ms. SLAUGHTER. Madam Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment 
(Garrett 34).
  NEA funding is an investment in the arts, but it's also an investment 
in communities and jobs. The arts have an incredible ability to enrich 
our communities and strengthen our cultural diversity, while positively 
impacting local economies and spurring billions in economic activity.
  A strong arts sector is an economic engine that stimulates 
businesses, generating $166.2 billion annually in economic activity, 
supports 5.7 million full-time jobs, and returns $12.6 billion in 
Federal income taxes.
  The NEA provides grants to communities across the country, supporting 
our national progress and scholarship in the arts. For each Federal 
dollar spent on the arts, it creates 9 dollars in economic activity for 
local communities.
  The arts creates jobs in every Congressional District across the 
country. In Representative Garrett's district alone, there are 2,042 
arts-related businesses that employ 8,473 people, according to 
Americans for the Arts. And yet, Representative Garrett is proposing to 
completely eliminate funding for the NEA, which will threaten jobs and 
businesses in his district.
  The arts also generates tourism revenue. Arts audiences spend more 
than $100 billion annually boosting local economies. Every year, 78-
percent of U.S. travelers take arts and heritage trips with their 
families, contributing more than $192 billion annually to the U.S. 
economy.
  In my district, the 28th District of New York, we have impressive 
institutions that attract tourists from far and wide, like the Shea's 
Performing Arts Center in Buffalo and the Memorial Art Gallery in 
Rochester.
  Americans embrace the arts on a personal level. Both military and 
civilian populations have long relied on the arts for inspiration, to 
raise morale, to fight anxiety, and to express our democratic values.
  This amendment represents the Republicans' commitment to killing jobs 
and stifling economic activity. It's flawed ideas like this one that 
have created zero jobs with a Republican Majority.
  I strongly urge my colleagues to oppose this job killing, economy 
stifling amendment.
  Mr. CARSON. Mr. Chair, as we continue to debate the Continuing 
Resolution and slowly whittle away funds for important programs, I rise 
to express my sincere regret over cuts to Community Health Centers.
  In my State of Indiana, these health centers serve nearly half a 
million Hoosiers, and at a time when American families continue to 
struggle to afford basic healthcare, I believe this is not the time to 
defund this valuable program.
  Not only will patients lose access to care, but jobs will be lost, as 
well. It will have a devastating impact on communities and patients who 
need the care most--patients with diabetes, heart disease, HIV/AIDS, 
pregnant women, and children--and leave them with literally nowhere to 
turn for care.
  This is no way to treat our Nation's most vulnerable populations.
  Ms. RICHARDSON. Mr. Chair, I rise today in strong opposition to 
Sections 2202 through 2214 of the bill, which cuts funding for needed 
investments in transportation and infrastructure. These are reckless 
cuts to important programs and place our country's economic recovery in 
jeopardy.
  Specifically, the cuts to transportation and infrastructure funding 
will not only cut jobs, but will curtail investment in our country's 
long-term economic growth.
  Mr. Chair, the best way to reduce the deficit is to put Americans 
back to work. The Republican CR is a job-killing bill that would do 
nothing more than wreak havoc on the American economy and will put us 
at an overall competitive disadvantage.
  The Republican CR cuts almost $18 billion from transportation and 
infrastructure investments alone. Investing in our crumbling 
infrastructure keeps our economy moving forward and puts Americans back 
to work by creating desperately needed jobs in the hard-hit 
construction industry.
  Adopting the GOP Continuing Resolution would result in the loss of 
nearly 300,000 private-sector jobs a figure that is in stark contrast 
to the GOP's commitment to keep job creation their number one priority.
  These reckless cuts to investments in roads, bridges, transit and 
rail will have tremendous consequences to our economic recovery and 
will render us uncompetitive in the global market.
  The cuts to transportation and infrastructure projects include: a cut 
of $1.4 billion in the Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund program; a 
$6.3 billion cut in high-speed/intercity rail; a cut of $613 million in 
the Tiger II program; and a cut of $75 million in the Tigger II 
program.
  These draconian cuts to the transportation and infrastructure budget 
will have a tremendous impact on the health and stability of our 
economy. Democrats and Republicans both agree that the Federal 
Government needs to tighten its belt when it comes to spending.
  However, cutting funding to transportation and infrastructure 
programs will curtail the investments that are desperately needed to 
sustain our long-term economic recovery.
  These divisive cuts to critical transportation and infrastructure 
projects will compromise programs that are invaluable to increasing 
efficiency of commerce, reducing fuel consumption, and creating jobs.
  The Republican proposal to cut key funding from the transportation 
and infrastructure budget will undermine the stability that is required 
of long-term transportation projects that require a steady source of 
funding and will eliminate key investments in roads and bridges that 
foster private sector job growth.
  The job-killing Republican Continuing Resolution will rescind $2.5 
billion for high-speed rail projects that have already been awarded. 
These are critical investments for our future.
  Creating efficient and affordable high speed rail line in popular 
transportation corridors, such as the Los Angeles to San Francisco will 
create thousands of jobs, protect our environment and reduce our 
dependence on foreign oil. In California alone, the GOP CR rescinds 
over $1 billion in funding for high-speed/intercity rail. This is 
absolutely unacceptable.
  In addition, the GOP Continuing Resolution would cancel 76 projects 
in 40 states and would cut $234 million that would be used to improve 
our nation's air traffic control system. The Republican proposal also 
threatens adequate funding to wastewater treatment facilities and sewer 
lines putting 40,000 American jobs in jeopardy.
  In California alone, the Republican CR would cut over 40,000 
transportation related jobs. Hundreds, if not thousands, of those jobs 
are sure to be lost in my district.
  This Continuing Resolution would also cut almost $100 million in 
funding to keep our water clean and would reduce funding to the state 
of California for transportation projects by over $1.2 billion.
  This bill does not create jobs, stifles long-term economic growth, 
and puts our country at a competitive disadvantage. This is not what 
the American people want.
  I urge my colleagues to stand with me in opposition to this bill.
  Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. Mr. Chair, as Ranking Member of the 
Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, rise to discuss the 
impact this bill will have on our Nation's security.
  I am talking, in part, about its impact on the efforts directly 
managed by the Department of Homeland Security. But I am also talking 
about our security in a broader sense: about what makes us strong, 
secure, and prosperous as a Nation.
  As for the bill's Homeland Security title, I want to commend Chairman 
Aderholt for doing what he could to shield several critical programs 
from the ill-advised cuts throughout this bill. Our border security, 
disaster relief, immigration enforcement, and transportation security 
efforts--for the most part--are protected.
  Unfortunately, these investments offer little consolation when we 
look at other areas of the DHS budget. This bill would severely cut 
federal support for state and local first responders, which is 
particularly troubling when we consider the fiscal restraints that 
state and local governments are facing right now.

[[Page 1852]]

  The elimination of firefighter grants is especially galling. That cut 
is guaranteed to result in thousands of firefighter layoffs across the 
United States.
  But while I am concerned about the problems with the homeland 
security section of this bill, I know that these cuts pale in 
comparison to other critical domestic services and investments.
  And that is exactly my point: the strength and security of our 
country are about so much more than how much we spend on weapons 
systems or how thoroughly we police the border. They are about the 
investments we make in our people, in our Nation's ability to recover 
from the current economic downturn and compete in the global economy.
  By this measure, this Republican proposal would dangerously weaken 
our security by undermining the things that make us strong--from 
education to scientific research to infrastructure--in an effort to 
achieve an arbitrary level of cuts dictated by the most extreme 
elements of the Republican Conference.
  As an illustration, look no further than my own congressional 
district, the Research Triangle of North Carolina. In just a few 
decades, the Triangle has become one of the leading centers of 
research, education, and innovation in the world--an engine of economic 
growth whose impact extends well beyond state lines.
  But now my Republican colleagues are threatening to undermine the 
very basis of our economic success
  This bill would gut higher education by slashing the maximum Pell 
Grant award by 17 percent. In my district, over 27,000 students receive 
Pell Grants--over 249,000 students in North Carolina overall.
  We cannot possibly ``out-educate'' our competitors by denying a 
college education to thousands of American students and allowing the 
most disadvantaged children to fall even further behind.
  Nor can we ``out-build'' our competitors by slashing funding for 
high-speed rail, clean energy technologies, and other investments in 
the infrastructure that will be necessary to sustain the industries of 
the 21st Century--as this Republican proposal would do. Cuts to 
transportation and infrastructure in this bill would directly result in 
the loss of over 20,000 jobs in North Carolina alone.
  Indeed, the enactment of this measure could sound the final death 
knell for any hope that the United States will become the global market 
leader in ``green'' technologies. Instead, we will only fall further 
behind as China and other countries develop the energy sources that 
will fuel our economy as the price of oil soars.
  Finally, this Republican plan would eviscerate our investments in 
scientific research--in the source of so much of our economic success, 
especially in the Research Triangle.
  It would cut cancer research and other NIH funding by nearly $1.6 
billion. It would cut National Science Foundation research and 
education by over $800 million. And it would cut $400 million from 
agricultural research that keeps our farmers competitive in the global 
market.
  These are just a few of the dozens of initiatives which have built 
the foundation for our Nation's economic prosperity--and, by extension, 
our Nation's security. To take a wrecking ball to this foundation at a 
time when we are struggling to recover from a financial crisis and 
compete again in the modern global economy would be both reckless and 
reprehensible.
  We shouldn't even be calling this bill a Continuing Resolution. The 
``CR'' could more accurately stand for ``Continuing the Recession'', or 
``Choking the Recovery''--because that's exactly what this bill will 
do.
  I urge my colleagues to oppose this dangerous measure.
  Ms. BORDALLO. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of amendment #488 pre-
printed in the Congressional Record. My amendment is simple and 
straightforward. It would fence off 24 million dollars for the ground-
based augmentation system (GBAS) which is a critical component of the 
Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) next generation air traffic 
control system.
  GBAS is in the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) National 
Airspace System Enterprise Architecture and the Next Generation 
(NextGen) Implementation Plan and is a foundational operational 
capability for international aviation. Over time, as aircraft equipage 
increases, GBAS will allow the FAA to decommission other ground based 
precision landing aids. It also facilitates the publication of safer, 
more efficient and highly accurate terminal arrival, departure and 
approach procedures. These more efficient terminal procedures will help 
to reduce CO2 emissions and fuel burn over the long run. 
Further, because of the operational flexibility of a system it will 
allow airports to quickly recover from natural disasters that can 
greatly deteriorate those airports landing approach vectors. But, we 
need to invest in this technology to get it to a Category 3 operational 
standard and this takes a commitment from the Congress, the FAA and the 
airlines.
  Since we are passing a year-long Continuing Resolution this will give 
the FAA a considerable amount of discretion in how it obligates funding 
for its facilities and equipment account. The significant cuts of 
almost $400 million to the facilities and equipment account could 
greatly hamper any true investment in GBAS or other critical components 
of the NextGen system. It is important for us to invest in the future 
safety of our skies now rather than later. To date, the FAA has shown a 
poor track record of supporting this critical part of the NextGen 
program and we want to ensure that the FAA knows Congress supports this 
important part of the program. I commend Congressman Tom Latham and 
Congressman John Olver, Chairman and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee 
on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies 
for their support of this program in the Omnibus bill. I look forward 
to working with them to ensure GBAS gets the support it deserves from 
the FAA.
  Mr. NUNES. Mr. Chair, after four years of complete neglect by the 
Democratic majority, the San Joaquin Valley of California is in utter 
shambles. The previous Congress inexplicably and utterly failed to 
comprehend that shutting off the water supply to an agricultural 
economy would create economic devastation. As a result, unemployment 
rates rose to 20% and are as high as 40% in some parts of the Valley.
  For the past several years, I have fought to restore the water flow 
and bring back the lost jobs. Every attempt I made to offer legislation 
was rebuffed by the Democrat majority. Instead, they chose poverty over 
prosperity and environmental activists over farm workers. The message 
sent to families in the San Joaquin Valley was that Congress doesn't 
care that hungry people stand for hours in food lines. It was more 
important to nourish a fish than nourish a child. In a final insult to 
the people of the San Joaquin Valley, carrots from China were among the 
food products provided in those lines.
  Those dark days are coming to an end. A new dawn has come in the 
House of Representatives--one that will bring jobs and water back to 
the parched San Joaquin Valley. The bill before us today is the first 
step in that direction.
  Over the last three years, the San Joaquin Valley has seen water 
supply cuts imposed and justified by draconian biological opinions on 
the delta smelt and salmon developed by the Fish and Wildlife Service 
(FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS). The United 
States District Court for the Eastern District of California has held 
that these opinions are unlawful and illogical; the National Academy of 
Sciences has said those opinions are not supported by science.
  With respect to the delta smelt biological opinion issued by the FWS 
on December 15, 2008, it has been remanded to the agency for 
preparation of a new biological opinion. The Court's December 14, 2010 
decision identified an overarching legal flaw in the ``reasonable and 
prudent alternative actions'' proposed by FWS. Specifically, the Court 
found that the FWS failed to comply with its own regulations that 
govern the development and evaluation of reasonable and prudent 
alternatives. The Court held that ``the RPA Actions manifestly 
interdict the water supply for domestic human consumption and 
agricultural use for over twenty million people who depend on the 
Projects for their water supply,'' and commented that, ```Trust us' is 
not acceptable. FWS has shown no inclination to fully and honestly 
address water supply needs beyond the species, despite the fact that 
its own regulation requires such consideration.''
  The language that was included in Section 1475 of the bill (H.R. 1) 
before the House today was specifically addressed by the Court. The 
Court found that the delta smelt reasonable and prudent alternative 
Actions 1, 2 and 3 are scientifically flawed because of FWS's use of 
raw salvage numbers without accounting for changes in population 
abundance across years, was ``scientifically inappropriate.'' The Court 
further found that ``the PTM study does not justify the imposition of 
-5,000 cfs as an upper limit in Actions 1, 2, or 3,'' and directed FWS 
``to perform an accurate scientific analysis and justify its ultimate 
decision regarding the imposition of a water flow ceiling.''
  Additionally, the Court found that FWS's finding that project pumping 
reduces delta smelt prey, despite serious criticism of the underlying 
analysis by FWS's own peer review panel ``suggests another unlawful, 
results-driven choice, ignoring best available science.'' The Court 
said that FWS's attempt to blame

[[Page 1853]]

the Central Valley Project and State Water Project for essentially all 
other stressors on the delta smelt population ``has not been justified, 
nor is it logical or explained by any science.'' The Court also said 
the entire modeling method employed by FWS in the delta smelt 
biological opinion was flawed, arbitrary and capricious, and ignored 
the best available science, all of which indicated that ``a bias was 
present.'' The Court concluded that because ``the impacts of regulating 
Project Operations are so consequential, such unsupported attributions 
(a result in search of a rationale) are unconscionable.''
  With respect to the salmon biological opinion issued by the NMFS, on 
June 4, 2009, the Court granted a preliminary injunction against 
implementation of reasonable and prudent alternative Actions IV.2.1 and 
IV.2.3--both of which are addressed in Section 1475 of H.R. 1. In its 
May 18, 2010 findings, the Court declared ``there is little to no 
justification in the record for the exact flow ratios chosen for RPA 
Action IV.2.1.'' It explained that ``the record does not support a 
finding that the specific Vernalis flow to export ratios imposed by 
Action IV.2.1. . . . are necessary to avoid jeopardy and/or adverse 
modification to any of the Listed Species.''
  In addressing Action IV.2.3, the Court found ``NMFS did not address 
relative population impacts in developing or explaining RPA Action 
IV.2.3.'' The Court ruled that ``salvage data was not scaled for 
population size, which any prudent and competent fish biologist and 
statistician would have done, making NMFS' reliance on the salvage data 
scientifically erroneous.'' Also, the Court found that ``[t]here are 
serious questions whether there is support in the record for the 
general proposition that exports reduce survival of salmonids in the 
interior Delta.''
  Last year, the National Academy of Science (NAS) issued a report on 
both of these biological opinions, including the reasonable and prudent 
alternatives imposed by each; the report was titled a ``Scientific 
Assessment of Alternatives for Reducing Water Management Effects on 
Threatened and Endangered Fishes in California's Bay Delta.'' In 
particular, regarding the delta smelt biological opinion, the NAS found 
that ``there is substantial uncertainty regarding the amount of flow 
that should trigger a reduction in exports.'' It also found ``the 
historical distribution of smelt on which the relationship with OMR 
flows was established no longer exists. Delta smelt are now sparsely 
distributed in the central and southern delta . . . and pump salvage 
has been extremely low, less than four percent of the 50-year average 
index.''
  Regarding Action IV.2.3 in the salmon biological opinion, the report 
concluded that ``the threshold levels needed to protect fish is not 
definitively established.'' The report counseled that ``[u]ncertainty 
in the effect of the flow triggers needs to be reduced, and more 
flexible triggers that might require less water should be evaluated.'' 
The report also found that ``there is little direct evidence to support 
the position that this action alone will benefit the San Joaquin 
salmon'' absent increased San Joaquin River flows. In reference to 
Action IV.2.1, the report found that while flows may help out 
migration, reducing the ``effectiveness of reducing exports to improve 
steelhead smolt survival is less certain,'' and that there is a ``weak 
influence of exports in all survival relationships.''
  As a final criticism of the reasonable and prudent alternatives in 
the two biological opinions, the report decried the lack of a 
``quantitative analytical framework that ties them together within 
species, between smelt and salmonid species, and across the watershed. 
This type of systematic, formalized analysis is necessary to provide an 
objective determination of the net effect of the actions on the listed 
species and on water users.'' The report found the lack of any such 
analysis to be ``a serious deficiency.'' As the NAS report observed, 
``[t]his issue has been raised repeatedly in peer reviews, but still 
has not been incorporated in the NMFS and FWS analyses.''
  Despite what the opponents of turning on the pumps say, Section 1475 
of H.R. 1 will not prevent the Bureau of Reclamation from complying 
with the Endangered Species Act in carrying out its vital function to 
deliver water supplies. Instead, Section 1475 is intended to enable the 
Central Valley Project to operate unencumbered by the proposed agency 
alternatives that the Court has already found do not comply with law 
and therefore should not be enforced.
  Furthermore, the bill will ban federal funding for the restoration of 
the San Joaquin River during the 2011 fiscal year. This is the first 
step in efforts to replace the flawed billion dollar salmon run. It 
also demonstrates Congressional intent to suspend restoration flows for 
2011, thereby keeping the water on the east side of the valley. Through 
the replacement of the existing restoration plan, we will be able to 
establish both an environmentally and economically responsible San 
Joaquin River restoration. This will include a year-round, live river 
on the San Joaquin but will also ensure a robust east side agriculture 
economy.
  I call on my colleagues to support this bill and these vital 
provisions which will ensure that farmers in the San Joaquin Valley 
have water to irrigate their fields, grow crops that feed this nation, 
and put thousands of people back to work.
  Mr. CARSON of Indiana. Mr. Chair, I am deeply troubled by the latest 
attacks on healthcare organizations such as Planned Parenthood that 
provide preventive and family planning care for millions of women and 
men across this country.
  These centers play key roles in the lives of many who cannot always 
acquire preventive services elsewhere.
  At a time when Americans continue to struggle to afford basic 
healthcare, eliminating Title X funding would have a devastating impact 
on women, men and teens in our communities.
  As one of the nation's leading advocates for reproductive health, 
providing access to contraception to breast and cervical cancer 
screenings, Planned Parenthood serves a very important purpose. I vow 
to continue my strong support for these vital healthcare services.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to language in H.R. 1 
that would prevent the Department of Housing and Urban Development from 
spending money on the Sustainable Communities Initiative. The language 
in the bill is short-sighted and represents a missed opportunity for 
communities around the country. Not only will it end a very successful 
HUD program that has helped communities large and small plan for growth 
and coordinate economic development investments, but it could halt a 
very successful partnership between HUD, the Department of 
Transportation, and the Environmental Protection Agency that promotes 
interagency coordination.
  Despite the obvious connections between housing, transportation, and 
land use, these three agencies have not always worked well together in 
the past. But Secretaries Donovan, LaHood, and Administrator Jackson 
and their agencies have spent the last year cutting down red tape and 
coordinating investments to meet multiple economic, environmental, and 
community objectives.
  These efforts not only save money, but they make government more 
efficient and ensure that the federal government is a better partner to 
local communities. As we reduce federal investments and watch our 
communities struggle, this seems like something all members of the 
House can get behind.
  The Sustainable Communities Initiative at HUD provides resources to 
help communities realize their own visions for more economically 
competitive communities that generate more jobs, lower housing and 
transportation costs, and use limited public funds more wisely. Another 
important function of the Sustainable Communities Initiative at HUD is 
to provide competitive grant funding. Working with the DOT and EPA, the 
Initiative offers grants to communities to integrate transportation, 
housing, land use and energy planning using state of the art data and 
tools.
  These grants go to communities all around the country, large and 
small, urban and rural. The interest in these has been extraordinary. 
In 2010, when HUD announced the challenge grants, a total of 630 
communities requested $1.2 billion in funding. HUD was only able to 
award 61 grants worth $69 million. HUD's sustainable communities 
regional planning grants were as popular: 225 regions applied for $450 
million, and HUD was able to award 45 regions a total of $98 million. 
This funding is helping to create jobs, drive economic development, 
provide housing and transportation choices, increase walkability, and 
improve quality of life.
  Eliminating the Sustainable Communities Initiative will deprive the 
communities who weren't awarded funding in the last round from the 
opportunity to have their projects funded next time. Because the bill 
also rescinds unobligated funds, projects that were awarded grants and 
are already in the pipeline could be cancelled. Even though the grants 
have been awarded, many of the final contracts have not been signed.
  I'd like to highlight a number of the 2010 Community Challenge 
Planning Grant projects that could be threatened as a result of the 
bill we have on the Floor today.
  The City of Augusta, GA, Augusta State University, and other partners 
will be awarded $1.8 million for the Augusta Sustainable Development 
Implementation Program, which will help plan the redevelopment of the 
Priority Development Corridor, a 4.5 mile north-south

[[Page 1854]]

``spine'' in the core of Augusta. The project will include a multi-
modal transportation corridor; a revision of current codes to 
facilitate a vibrant, mixed-use, mixed-income development; and a plan 
for green, affordable housing in Georgia's second-largest city.
  The City of Covington, KY, will be awarded $359,000 to create a 
Downtown Action Plan with the active involvement of citizens and 
stakeholders. Among other things, the plan will increase the number of 
workers who live downtown near jobs, decreasing traffic and pollution. 
Partners in the project include the National Development Council, 
Northern Kentucky University Center for Economic Analysis and 
Development, Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky, Ohio Kentucky 
Indiana Regional Council of Governments, Northern Kentucky Area 
Planning Council and the Covington Business Council.
  The City of Flint, MI will be awarded $1.5 million to replace its 
existing city master plan with an integrated plan for sustainable 
development. The outreach process will include neighborhood-level 
discussion about residents' vision for the plan. Among others, project 
partners include the Genesee County Chamber of Commerce, University of 
Michigan-Flint, Hurley Medical Center, and the Community Foundation of 
Greater Flint.
  If this language passes, Grand Traverse County, MI could lose a 
$400,000 grant to create a Housing Inventory and Assessment, a County 
Master Plan, neighborhood revitalization, and affordable housing. The 
City of Hattiesburg, MS could lose $150,000 for a plan to lay the 
foundation for a commercial and residential mixed-use, mixed-income 
housing district. The City of Claremont, NH could lose $58,000 to 
undertake a comprehensive zoning analysis that will identify tools to 
maintain its historic cityscape, encourage development to maximize use 
of existing infrastructure, drive private investment and economic 
development to downtown, and improve the quantity and quality of 
housing. Oklahoma City could lose $500,000 to develop a plan that 
provides an inventory and analysis of existing land availability, 
identify additional lands that may be designated for industrial use, 
assess infrastructure needs of that land, set priorities to help guide 
investment, and facilitate new industrial development.
  Many more communities, which I don't have time to list now, have 
received funding and assistance from the Sustainable Communities 
Initiatives.
  Keep in mind that this is a voluntary grant program. These 
communities have approached HUD to seek funding to support their own 
visions for economic revitalization. The grant applications are created 
from the ground up by local governments in partnership with community 
and business organizations. An important aspect of each of these 
projects is citizen outreach and public engagement.
  I hope my colleagues will join me in rejecting this short-sighted 
proposal.
  Ms. HARMAN. Mr. Chair, I am pleased that Mr. Akin plans to withdraw 
his amendment #181 to defund the bipartisan indoor lighting provision 
of the historic Energy Independence and Security Act, which President 
Bush signed into law in 2007.
  Let me underscore a few facts:
  First, Chairman Upton plans to hold an oversight hearing on this 
provision in the near future--so action today would have been 
premature.
  Second, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, which 
represents the domestic manufacturers of light bulbs and includes GE, 
Sylvania and Phillips, urges a ``no'' vote.
  Third, the law does not ban incandescent light bulbs, or force 
Americans to buy Chinese-made compact fluorescent bulbs that contain 
small traces of mercury.
  Fourth, what the law does is set a glide path to US manufacture of 
more efficient light bulbs--which are already saving consumers an 
average of $200 per family per year. Manufacturing facilities in 
Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Florida and Torrance, CA--in my 
district--are creating thousands of new jobs right now.
  Finally, when the law passed by a strong bipartisan vote my co-author 
Rep. Upton said: ``. . . it is a bipartisan effort in every way . . . 
this is where we need to be . . . where the world needs to be.''
  And then-Ranking Member on Energy and Commerce Rep. Barton added: ``. 
. . this is one of the few areas where there has been constructive 
dialogue and bipartisanship . . .''
  Withdrawing this amendment is the proper thing to do and I commend 
Rep. Akin for doing so.
  Ms. RICHARDSON. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to Section 2226 of 
the bill, which will cut funding for the Community Development Block 
Grant (CDBG) program from the current level $3.948 billion to $1.5 
billion, a 62 percent decrease.
  This drastic reduction would have a devastating impact on communities 
all across America, including my district, and hinder our ability to 
continue doing our part in aiding the Nation's economic recovery.
  CDBG works. In Los Angeles County, for example, CDBG funding has 
provided a direct benefit to low- and moderate-income residents and 
their neighborhoods, something that simply would not have been possible 
without this federal-local partnership.
  Over the past five years, Los Angeles County's CDBG program has 
accomplished the following: 1. created or retained 1,109 jobs; 2. 
provided loans and technical assistance to over 14,000 businesses; 3. 
provided assistance to over four million individuals in unincorporated 
areas and participating cities in Los Angeles County; 4. preserved 
6,217 housing units; 5. provided improvements to almost 23,000 
facilities; and 6. removed over 28 million square feet of graffiti.
  Mr. Chair, reducing CDBG funding would mean curtailing or cancelling 
the following types of activities in my district and countless others 
across the Nation: 1. Housing Rehabilitation Loans and Grants for 
families the elderly and disabled persons; 2. Commercial Facade 
Improvements in distressed areas; 3. Youth Programs providing 
afterschool, child care, gang prevention, and intervention services; 4. 
Senior Programs that offer meals, housing placement, and recreation; 5. 
Construction and improvement of critical public facilities and 
infrastructure; and 6. Business Loan Programs to bring development and 
jobs into our communities.
  Mr. Chair, the federal budget is not merely a ledger documenting 
receipts and expenditures but a reflection of our national values. And 
certainly nothing is more central to our national character than its 
strong, healthy, and vibrant local communities. The CDBG program is 
indispensable if we are to continue the important community and 
economic development initiatives needed to revitalize our economy, 
create jobs, and put people back to work in homes they own and can 
afford.
  Mrs. CAPPS. Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 1.
  This deeply flawed bill does nothing to create jobs or promote 
economic growth. In fact, it actually undercut these critical 
priorities, threatening to destabilize our fragile economic recovery.
  The bill cuts billions of dollars from programs that increase 
transportation and housing choices, reduce traffic on our highways, and 
lower energy costs for American families. It cuts Community Development 
Block Grants that empower local cities and counties to prioritize the 
housing and infrastructure projects that make the most sense for them. 
And it eliminates funding for the Sustainable Communities Initiative--a 
program that strengthens local economic competitiveness and reduces 
commutes to jobs, shops and schools.
  These proven programs are already creating jobs and stimulating 
economic growth. They help local communities attract new businesses and 
jumpstart their economies. They help improve local business districts 
and provide affordable housing options nearby. And rather than build 
expensive new roads and highways, these programs focus on fixing what 
we already have.
  In short, these programs create jobs. High tech jobs. Clean energy 
jobs. Construction jobs. High quality, local jobs that pay well and 
can't be shipped overseas.
  Rather than enhancing these proven job creators, the Majority is 
eliminating them. The irrational spending cuts in this bill completely 
undermine these proven programs and threaten to cripple our fragile 
economic recovery. It makes no sense.
  But I suppose we shouldn't be surprised, given the Majority's record 
on the issue. It's been nearly two months and we have not voted on a 
single bill to create jobs or promote economic growth. Not one.
  Mr. Chair, we can't simply cut our way to economic prosperity.
  This CR is nothing more than a negligent political gimmick. But this 
gimmick has real consequences. Real consequences for our local 
communities whose crumbling infrastructure will only deteriorate 
further; real consequences for the millions of unemployed Americans 
whose search for a job will only get longer; and real consequences for 
Middle Class families whose struggle to stay afloat will only get 
tougher.
  It's time this Congress starts doing what our constituents sent us 
here to do--create jobs. I urge my colleagues to support jobs creation 
and oppose H.R. 1.
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chair, I strongly oppose this bill's 
elimination of funding for Title X family planning services.

[[Page 1855]]

  This extremely successful program helps both men and women access 
lifesaving preventative healthcare, including breast exams, cancer 
screenings, and HIV tests.
  The proposed cuts in H.R. 1 would eliminate these, which is 
unconscionable.
  If my colleagues across the aisle really want to reduce the number of 
abortions in this country, they should support Title X funding which 
helps prevent unintended pregnancies through education and access to 
contraception.
  In my home state of California, Title X helps more than 200,000 women 
avoid unintended pregnancies.
  The birth rate among California teenagers has decreased by more than 
half since 1992. Without Title X funding it would be 37 percent higher!
  Eliminating the $2.2 million in Title X funds that San Diego County 
receives every year will mean taking away care in a state already 
struggling with limited resources.
  I will not let San Diego families lose these valuable health 
services.
  When women have better access to family planning, it leads to 
healthier outcomes for both mother and child.
  Leadership proposes these cuts under the guise of being ``fiscally 
responsible,'' but that is far from reality, particularly for states 
that are in budget crises like California.
  The contraceptive and other reproductive health services provided at 
Title X--supported centers in my state saved $581,890,000 in public 
funds in 2008 alone.
  Cutting family planning is fiscally irresponsible.
  Eliminating it doesn't save taxpayers any money; in fact, it puts 
their health and potentially their lives at risk. That is a cost we 
cannot afford.
  Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina. Mr. Chair, with the federal budget 
deficit soaring past $1.5 trillion dollars, our national debt is no 
longer simply a pressing economic problem. It is a looming catastrophe. 
If we do not reduce government spending immediately and by massive 
amounts America will never recover. The annual deficit alone equates to 
nearly $5,000 for every man woman and child. That means we are spending 
$5,000 per person more than we take in each year. The amount of total 
debt our government has accumulated is much too great for our citizens 
to even fathom at $14 trillion.
  I agree with the nonpartisan Eagle Forum citizen advocacy group which 
recently stated that if we do not drastically reduce spending now, the 
problem won't simply be that our children and grandchildren will be 
saddled with debt. Our currency will become worthless, economic growth 
will become nearly impossible and our nation will be plunged into a 
modern equivalent of the dark ages. Our only choice is to drastically 
reduce the size and cost of our government. It is not possible to raise 
taxes high enough to pay for all the spending the President wants. 
Despite the tremendous work ethic and resourcefulness of the American 
people, it is no longer even possible for the United States to grow our 
way out of this mess. Freezing spending is not enough. Merely trimming 
spending is not enough. We need to cut and cut deeply. Representatives 
Jim Jordan and Scott Garrett and Senator Jim DeMint have proposed $173 
billion of discretionary spending cuts over the next two years, $16.1 
billion in cuts to Medicaid, ending the ``stimulus'' program which will 
save $45 billion, and ending government ownership of Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac, saving another $30 billion. This proposal is an excellent 
start. It is necessary. And it may be America's only hope if we wish to 
avoid an economic calamity.
  Mrs. MALONEY. Mr. Chair, this week, the House is debating a 
Continuing Resolution (H.R. 1) that includes the dangerous elimination 
of funding to a key organization, UNFPA, that provides life-saving 
services to women, children and families around the world in over 150 
countries--more than any other organization in the world.
  The work UNFPA does recognizes that there is a direct connection 
between a woman's ability to plan her family, space her pregnancies, 
and give birth safely and her ability to get an education, work outside 
the home, support her family, and participate fully in her community. 
UNFPA knows that when we ignore the health of women, there is a 
measurable cost in terms of lost productivity, lost resources, and lost 
lives. The CR works against these efforts which is why I urge you to 
vote against it.
  Recent natural disasters remind us that the needs of women must not 
be forgotten in times of emergency. The devastating earthquake in Haiti 
did not stop the need for access to good maternal health care. Haiti 
already had the highest rate of maternal death in the Western 
Hemisphere before the earthquake, with the lifetime risk of dying in 
childbirth equaling 1 in 47.
  Since the earthquake, UNFPA has delivered reproductive health 
supplies, including clean delivery kits and other maternal and neonatal 
health care products.
  UNFPA helps to ensure women and their health care needs are not 
ignored in the wake of a disaster. But we can't wait until times of 
emergency to act. Each year more than 536,000 women die due to 
complications developed during pregnancy and childbirth, and another 10 
million suffer debilitating illnesses and lifelong disabilities and 
UNFPA works to help prevent these deaths and complications.
  Every step of the way, UNFPA is working to help women, prevent death, 
and support healthy families. This bill will cut funding to the basic 
work UNFPA does as well as the work in does in times of emergency, 
including Haiti, the Southeast Asia tsunami in 2004, and Afghanistan in 
2001, among other times.
  For this, and scores of other reasons, I encourage you to vote ``no'' 
on H.R. 1.
  Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the cuts to the 
Agriculture and FDA budget in H.R. 1. They are rashly made, and they 
will endanger both our food supply and our families.
  During my time as Chair of this subcommittee, we worked hard to 
provide the resources to better improve the safety of food, drugs and 
devices. We expanded access to fundamental nutrition and hunger 
programs. And we invested wisely in key areas like conservation and 
rural development. This continuing resolution threatens to undo all of 
our hard work.
  Instead of cutting special interest waste, like the subsidies that go 
to high-income farmers and corporate farms, this continuing resolution 
hurts everyone else. It hurts the economy, will cost us jobs, and it 
threatens the middle-class and working families we were elected to 
represent.
  We are already playing a dangerous game in terms of food safety--Far 
too many of the dishes on our kitchen table get there uninspected. But 
under this continuing resolution, there would be 2000 fewer firm 
inspections--and 10,000 fewer import inspections--conducted by the FDA.
  In fact, both the FDA and USDA would have to furlough thousands of 
inspectors under this plan. That is more than just a food safety 
problem. It means the nearly 6,300 meat and poultry plants across 
America would be legally required to stop operating--costing 
approximately $11 billion. And it would mean, by the basic principles 
of the market, that the price of meat and poultry would increase for 
every single family in America.
  In addition, this CR rolls back the budget of the Farm Service 
Agency--forcing a 40 day furlough of all employees and meaning long 
delays and less help for farmers and ranchers.
  In cuts food aid to the lowest it has been in a decade, 15 million 
people would lose desperately-needed emergency food assistance, which 
will endanger our war efforts and the security of our troops in 
Afghanistan. And 2.5 million more women and children lose the vital aid 
provided by McGovern-Dole, a program with long bipartisan support.
  There are many terrible ideas in this CR, but perhaps the unkindest 
cut of all is what will be done to the Commodity Supplemental Food 
Program and the Women with Infant Children feeding program. Instead of 
slashing subsidies for oil companies and saving $40 billion, the 
majority has decided to deny over 100,000 low-income seniors from 
receiving food packages, and cut almost $750 million from WIC, a 
program serving our most vulnerable citizens.
  They are quite literally taking food from hungry seniors and 
children's mouths, and giving it to the special interests--corporate 
farms and oil companies--who write their checks. It is unconscionable.
  I urge my colleagues to vote against these reckless and irresponsible 
cuts, and to work together on a budget that better reflects our 
priorities as a nation.
  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Chair, I wish to express my strong support for the 
Sustainable Communities Initiative and oppose any cuts to this 
important economic development program in H.R. 1.
  The Sustainable Communities Initiative illustrates a successful 
partnership among government agencies to invest in our local economies. 
At a time when there's so much talk of making government work better, 
this initiative is a shining example of cutting red tape and fostering 
collaboration among similar community interests.
  Through this initiative, the Departments of Transportation, Housing 
and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency award 
competitive grants to communities for innovative projects that connect 
the creation of good jobs, sustainable housing and efficient modes of 
transportation.

[[Page 1856]]

  In just the short time that this initiative has been in existence, it 
has awarded numerous competitive grants to communities across the 
country.
  In 2010, a total of 630 communities requested $1.2 billion in finding 
and HUD awarded 61 grants worth $69 million. Clearly, communities see 
the great potential benefits for the projects funded by this unique 
initiative.
  Although my hometown of Worcester, Massachusetts was not a grantee in 
the last round of awards, it earned the designation of ``preferred 
sustainability status.'' Eliminating funding for the Sustainable 
Communities Initiative would prevent Worcester and dozens of 
communities across the country from having the opportunity to receive 
grants to meet their multiple economic, environmental and community 
needs.
  Furthermore, language in H.R. 1 to rescind unobligated funds would 
threaten projects in communities that were recently awarded grants.
  Mr. Chair, cutting funding for the Sustainable Communities Initiative 
would be harmful to job creation efforts and would take away a vital 
tool to help communities transition to a 21st century economy.
  I urge my colleagues to support the Sustainable Communities 
Initiative and oppose any cuts to this program.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition to the C.R. put 
forward by my Republican colleagues, and specifically to the defunding 
of Title X family planning programs authorized under the Public Health 
Service Act.
  Begun in 1970 by President Nixon, Title X funding provides for 
voluntary family planning projects, and is essential to protecting 
women's health services. Currently, Title X is our Nation's only 
program dedicated to providing low-income Americans with family 
planning and reproductive health services.
  My colleagues on the other side of the aisle are attempting to 
misconstrue Title X as federal subsidizing of abortion. However, Title 
X does not provide for abortion services. But it does cover essential 
health care for millions of families and women. From birth control to 
cancer screenings, approximately five million Americans rely upon Title 
X programs every year.
  We simply cannot afford to cut lifesaving and preventive care 
services for those who would not otherwise have access to such care, 
especially in our current economic climate.
  I urge my colleagues to vote against the defunding of these vital 
health programs contained in Title X by voting against the C.R.
  Mr. SHERMAN. Mr. Chair, Congressman Frank and Congressman Holt 
offered amendments reducing funding for the Internal Revenue Service, 
and increasing funding for the SEC and the Consumer Financial 
Protection Bureau, respectively.
  I do not support a reduction in the budget of the Internal Revenue 
Service, nor do I support the rather modest cut to the General Services 
Administration included in the Frank Amendment
  I believe that if the House adopts the Frank and Holt Amendments that 
the Senate will provide the funds to the Securities and Exchange 
Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau indicated in 
those amendments, and will also restore the funds to the IRS and the 
GSA. Accordingly, I did not vote for these amendments as if they were 
the last word that Congress would utter regarding the funding of the 
SEC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the IRS, and the GSA. 
Rather, I believe that in the Senate, and in the Conference committee, 
the support registered for the Frank and Holt Amendments will bolster 
the claim of those trying to provide adequate funding for the SEC and 
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, but will not undercut those 
of us seeking adequate funding for the IRS and GSA.
  My support for IRS funding does not mean that I do not think that 
there needs to be significant reform of the IRS, its operations, and in 
some hopefully rare cases, the manner in which it treats tax payers.
  Mr. PIERLUISI. Mr. Chair, I rise to express my strong opposition to 
the Continuing Resolution, which would make devastating cuts to vital 
programs that can help America win the future.
  I recognize the need to reduce our nation's deficit in a thoughtful 
and deliberate manner. But, as a recent editorial stated, ``these are 
the wrong cuts, to the wrong programs, at the wrong time.'' To sharply 
scale back or to eliminate programs that are critical to our nation's 
future in an effort to achieve an arbitrary level of deficit reduction 
is unwise. Although I disagree with many of the cuts included in this 
bill, I will focus my remarks on three programs whose long-term 
benefits far outweigh their short-term costs: the Pell Grant Program, 
COPS funding, and the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving 
Funds.
  Pell Grants give nearly ten million disadvantaged students, who might 
otherwise be unable to afford college, the ability to obtain a 
university education. As the cost of college rises, and economic 
challenges persist, many more families are struggling to pay their 
child's tuition bill. Yet, the legislation we are considering today 
would reduce annual Pell Grant funding for students by nearly $690 on 
average--and by nearly $720 in my district, Puerto Rico. Many students 
who are currently attending college with the help of a Pell Grant, or 
who plan to attend college with the help of a Pell Grant, will be 
unable to do so if this cut is implemented.
  Whatever one's political affiliation, it should be clear that a 
college education opens doors for our young men and women that would 
otherwise remain sealed shut. College graduates earn significantly more 
than those without college degrees and have a broader range of career 
options available to them. And when our students are better educated, 
our economy is more prosperous and our nation is more competitive. Our 
nation will not be able to keep pace with China and other countries if 
we do not increase the number of Americans who graduate from college. 
To decrease Pell Grants in the present environment is not just bitter 
medicine; it is bad medicine.
  Another proposed funding cut that would cost our country dearly in 
the long term is the bill's elimination of the COPS Hiring Program. 
This program puts officers on the streets, protects communities, and 
saves lives. No matter what part of the country you are from, you 
deserve to feel secure in your home. As Attorney General of Puerto Rico 
in the 1990s, I worked with the Clinton Administration to help secure 
passage of the bill that created the COPS program. Since the mid-1990s, 
Puerto Rico has received over $160 million in COPS grants. This funding 
has translated into over 3,500 new police officers in our communities. 
I can attest that programs funded by COPS have been a key ingredient in 
Puerto Rico's fight against crime. If the COPS Hiring Program is 
eliminated and crime increases, it will produce economic and emotional 
costs that far exceed the investment we could make to COPS today. To 
propose the elimination of the COPS Hiring Program--especially at a 
time when states and territories are least able to find the funding 
necessary to safeguard their citizens--is profoundly irresponsible.
  Finally, I have deep concerns about proposed cuts to air and water 
quality improvement programs administered by the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency. The proposed reductions to the Clean 
Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds will be especially 
difficult to bear on water and wastewater systems across the country. 
Reliable 24-hour delivery of safe drinking water is essential to the 
public health, economic opportunity, and quality of life of my 
constituents and all Americans. The state and tribal grants 
administered by the Environmental Protection Agency through these 
revolving funds are important investments in this infrastructure 
nationwide.
  I am concerned not only with these reductions, but also with 
reductions to the part of the agency that addresses air quality. As a 
result of action late in the 111th Congress, Puerto Rico and the 
territories are--for the first time--eligible for the Diesel Emissions 
Reduction grants program. The program, however, would be sliced in half 
by this bill, limiting its reach and effect toward reducing harmful 
particulate matter emissions. Puerto Rico is challenged with poor air 
quality, and I am concerned with its linkage to asthma and other 
chronic respiratory illnesses. We cannot make progress toward improving 
respiratory health without proper funding for air quality programs.
  Because H.R. 1 proposes cuts to these and many other important 
programs, I urge my colleagues to oppose the bill.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of Amendment 64 offered by 
my friend, Mr. Thompson of California.
  This amendment would require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, not later 
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to adopt 
standards consistent with the Property Assessed Clean Energy Program of 
the Department of Energy.
  In my hometown of Sacramento, our economy is struggling with 
unacceptably high unemployment, and furloughs of State employees have 
erased tens of millions of dollars from the economy.
  Since July 6 of last year, I have worked diligently with my 
colleagues, specifically Representatives Thompson, Israel, Perlmutter, 
and Sarbanes, to restore the promise of the job creation program known 
as PACE.
  The PACE program is an extremely important component in our nation's 
transition to a

[[Page 1857]]

clean energy economy. It would upgrade thousands of homes with energy 
efficiency products, and create thousands of jobs in California alone.
  Unfortunately, our efforts to expand and support the PACE program 
have been extremely difficult because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and 
the Federal Housing Finance Agency, are not holding up their end of the 
bargain.
  I have heard from clean tech and business leaders about the 
importance of the PACE program for economic growth, achieving energy 
independence, and reducing our emissions. One company CEO told me that, 
``The only thing worse than absence of jobs, is the illusion of 
jobs.''And that is exactly what has happened as a result of the 
inaction of Fannie and Freddie Mac, and the ill-advised actions from 
Federal Housing Finance Agency.
  Today's amendment can once again make those jobs a reality.
  We have seen the job creation benefits from the PACE programs in 
Sonoma and Placer County, and I know my hometown of Sacramento is eager 
to take advantage of the program.
  I am pleased to support my colleague's amendment to require the 
reinstatement of the program as intended.
  I will continue to fight for the PACE program, which will reduce 
energy bills, promote a cleaner environment, and put hard-working 
Americans back to work. lt is important for Sacramento, and for our 
economy as a whole.
  I urge my colleagues to vote in support of Amendment 64.
  Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition to the CR put forward by my 
Republican colleagues, and specifically to the amendment offered by Mr. 
Garrett of New Jersey and Mr. Mack of Florida, and a separate amendment 
by Mr. Walberg of Michigan, which would either eliminate or drastically 
reduce funding for the National Endowment for the Arts.
  In tough economic times, funding for the arts may appear to be an 
easy area to cut. But we cannot forget that the arts industry is an 
active and crucial part of the American economy.
  The non-profit arts industry generates $166.2 billion annually, and 
supports 5.7 million full-time jobs across the United States. Spending 
in the arts stimulates local economies, creates attractive communities, 
and supports tourism. Cultural tourism alone contributes $192 billion 
annually to our country's economy.
  And the federal government is not the lone supporter of these 
projects, but the federal funding is critical to leveraging local, 
state and private dollars. The direct grants from the National 
Endowment for the Arts that reach each and every congressional district 
around the country are often matched by other resources.
  In my hometown of Sacramento, California, NEA funding is helping to 
support a thriving arts scene that is putting our city on the map. In 
addition to bringing intellectual diversity to the region, it is 
helping to support young artists, smaller museums, and cultural 
programs. NEA funding supports galleries and exhibits that are part an 
extended classroom for our students.
  As a former docent of the Crocker Art Museum, I can tell you 
firsthand the effect that an individual piece of art, or a trip to a 
museum, can have on a child. Many children would never have the 
opportunity otherwise to participate in these inspiring experiences.
  And the commitment of federal funding for our local artists and art 
venues sends a strong signal that we are a nation that thinks art is 
important, and that symbol's influence cannot be overstated.
  We must make tough choices. But the question is where. I do not 
believe gutting our nation's cultural institutions is the place to do 
so. We cannot afford to stifle the creativity of our students and our 
citizens.
  I urge my colleagues to vote against these harmful amendments and 
against this CR.
  Ms. HIRONO. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this continuing 
resolution, which endangers our fragile economic recovery by throwing 
more Americans out of jobs. Rather than focusing on the creation and 
retention of jobs, this bill gives the pink slip to hundreds of 
thousands of Americans. Who's getting the pink slip? Nurses, teachers, 
police officers, and firefighters, among others. At the same time, 
states and counties are having to lay off these essential personnel as 
they struggle to balance their budgets. How will putting more people in 
the unemployment line create jobs? These job cuts strike at the heart 
of the middle class in America.
  At a recent press conference in Washington DC, Speaker John Boehner's 
response to the job losses (later estimated at nearly 1 million jobs) 
caused by the bill was, ``So be it,'' in apparent resignation or 
indifference to the pain these cuts will cause to individuals and 
communities across our country.
  In addition to increasing the ranks of the unemployed, the Republican 
leadership is making the cuts on the backs of the most vulnerable among 
us. At the same time, they are damaging our nation's long-term economic 
prospects by cutting needed investments in education, innovation, and 
infrastructure.
  No vulnerable group is safe from the Republican cuts. Head Start is 
slashed by $1 billion and child care by $39 million, ending at least 
50,000 jobs nationwide and ending services to more than 200,000 
children. In Hawaii, newly opened Head Start classrooms serving 700 
children would need to close their doors, giving these children no 
place to go for quality early education to prepare for success in 
school and in life.
  This bill cuts basic K-12 education services for all low-income 
schools by $700 million nationwide and cuts after-school programs by 
$100 million. This anti-education bill also bursts students' dreams of 
college success, reducing Pell grants by an average of $700 for some 
19,000 low-income college students in Hawaii, and Direct Loans to 
30,000 Hawaii college students.
  The Republicans' budget cuts would completely eliminate all Native 
Hawaiian Education programs. I joined with Representative Don Young of 
Alaska to offer an amendment to reinstate funding eligibility for 
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian education programs. We worked hard to 
explain the importance of these programs to our colleagues, and the 
Young-Hirono Amendment passed 331 to 117.
  In fact, this bill as introduced reflects a particular bias against 
Native Hawaiians in that it also eliminates funding for Native Hawaiian 
health care and Native Hawaiian housing programs.
  The backbone of our health care system is dismantled by drastically 
cutting funding for community health centers. These centers, which 
serve the most vulnerable in our population, are cut by $1.3 billion. 
In my rural district, spread over 7 inhabited islands, community health 
centers are used by everyone in the community due to the shortage of 
primary care physicians. In Hawaii our network of community health 
centers serve nearly 127,000 patients, one-third of whom are Medicaid 
eligible.
  H.R. 1 threatens women's health by eliminating a safety net program 
that provides family planning services and lifesaving preventive care 
to 3 million Americans every year. By eliminating funding for the Title 
X Family Planning Program, the only dedicated sexual and reproductive 
health clinic on Hawaii Island may have to close its doors. The Planned 
Parenthood health centers on Oahu and Maui would be forced to reduce 
their clinic hours.
  I hope seniors in our country are taking note. This bill dramatically 
cuts funding available to the Social Security Administration by $1.7 
billion below what they need to maintain promised service levels. 
Social Security already operates at very low cost. Overhead is less 
than 2 percent of the total budget for Social Security. The bill 
eliminates 3,500 jobs in the Social Security Administration and delays 
payment of earned benefits for hundreds of thousands of retirees, 
survivors, and disabled workers.
  I've heard Democrats and Republicans alike acknowledge their support 
for infrastructure spending. Yet this Republican bill cuts funding for 
transportation infrastructure and housing by 24 percent compared with 
the President's budget. These cuts to infrastructure are the largest 
cuts on a percentage basis in the bill--cuts to programs that we know 
create jobs and improve the quality of life in our communities. These 
short-sighted, short-term deficits cuts will lead to long-term 
continuing deterioration of our infrastructure, which will cost us more 
to fix down the road.
  Under this bill, Hawaii would lose $11 million in desperately needed 
funding to upgrade our sewers and wastewater treatment plants. Hawaii 
would also lose $5 million for new energy-efficient circulator buses 
recently awarded by the Federal Transit Administration.
  These deep cuts in infrastructure funding are opposed by groups as 
diverse as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO. The Republican 
majority hasn't brought a single measure to the floor this Congress 
that will help create jobs. Instead they are focused on cutting jobs. 
When you cut billions from programs, you are cutting jobs. No amount of 
rhetoric will cover up that fact.
  We should be eliminating billions in tax breaks for the oil and gas 
industries. Instead, the Republican Majority has cut research in energy 
efficiency and renewable energy programs. And because many on the other 
side of the aisle choose to ignore science that contradicts their 
preferred view of the world, the bill makes radical cuts to funding for 
entities such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 
climate and ocean monitoring programs.

[[Page 1858]]

  The bill also cuts funding for medical research and for small 
business and economic development assistance programs. These cuts will 
stifle innovation, limit job creation, and threaten our competitiveness 
in the global economy.
  I've only cited a few of the short-sighted, anti-middle class, anti-
senior, anti-woman, and anti-education provisions in the bill. I'll be 
voting no, and I urge all my colleagues to do the same. We need to 
focus on creating, not eliminating, jobs; on sparking, not depressing, 
innovation; and on investing, not disinvesting, in education for our 
next generation.
  Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the Quayle-Broun amendment.
  This amendment would strip away Davis-Bacon wage protections in 
Hawaii and nationwide.
  Enacted in 1931, the Davis-Bacon Act ensures that workers on federal 
construction contracts receive at least the prevailing wage for 
construction jobs.
  The Davis-Bacon Act ensures projects are built by skilled and 
experienced workers who know what they're doing. Prevailing wages and 
higher-skilled work result in greater productivity and lower cost.
  In industries without Davis-Bacon protections, we have seen 
unscrupulous contractors engage in a ``race to the bottom,'' trying to 
undercut each other to perform shoddy work, with less-skilled workers, 
at sub-par wages. These projects often end up costing more in the long-
run due to repairs, revisions, and delays.
  Some claim that Davis-Bacon costs the federal government more. On the 
contrary, studies show that higher-wage workers are more productive, 
saving hundreds of millions of dollars in the long run.
  Construction workers who build highways, homes, or buildings should 
be able to earn enough to feed their families, put a roof over their 
heads, and send their kids to college. Beyond just helping workers and 
their families, prevailing wages improve local economies. Workers spend 
their income in local businesses and pay local taxes.
  Workers participate in building trades training programs and health 
care programs and are not dependent on benefits from other social 
programs. One study found that local prevailing wage law generated 2.4 
times the economic benefit of the cost of the construction project.
  I strongly support Davis-Bacon protections and oppose this misguided 
amendment. I urge my colleagues to do the same.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the C.R. put forward 
by my Republican colleagues, and specifically to Amendment 450, offered 
by Mr. Mack of Florida. This amendment and the C.R. would eliminate 
funding for the Corporation for National and Community Service and all 
of the programs it supports.
  As Americans, we share a common belief that volunteerism and 
community service make our country stronger. But we cannot be a leader 
in the world, if we are not leaders in our own communities.
  And as we speak, tens of thousands of Americans are involved in 
service projects across the country through one of several AmeriCorps 
programs. These volunteers are building houses, helping young people 
learn to read, collecting food and clothing, and much, much more.
  Through programs such as Learn and Serve, VISTA, Teach for America, 
Experience Corps, Youth Build, Habitat for Humanity, City Year, and 
Jumpstart, volunteers are using evidence-based research to make a 
tremendous impact in their communities.
  But federal funding for each one of these programs would be shut down 
if Amendment 450 and this C.R. were to be enacted.
  In my district of Sacramento, California--home to the NCCC Pacific 
Region--300 AmeriCorps*NCCC volunteers would be sent home. Although 
these volunteers have already committed to a year of service--and they 
have all already been deployed--this amendment would require the 
Corporation for National and Community Service to buy their plane 
tickets home. That process alone would make this a deficient program, 
and leave the federal government liable for the costs.
  Put simply: Amendment 450 and the cuts for AmeriCorps in the C.R. are 
ill-conceived.
  We see an enormous return in our investments in our national service 
programs. For every volunteer we help to support, we recruit another 10 
volunteers. And for every dollar the federal government invests, the 
organizations are able to leverage a matching dollar through local and 
private funding.
  Mr. Chair, under current law, the Lifeline program provides Americans 
struggling to climb out of poverty and get back on their feet a choice 
to receive a landline phone or a mobile phone subsidized by the 
Universal Service Fund. In my district of Sacramento, we have 25,000, 
and in the State of California we have approximately 2 million, 
residents who benefit from this service.
  Low income people use Lifeline service to look for a job, call their 
doctors, reach their child care providers, or contact their family in 
an emergency.
  But Amendment No. 468 would eliminate USF funding for mobile phone 
service for the poorest Americans, and maintain it only for landline 
phones, forcing poor people to stay at home waiting for important 
calls, rather than getting out of their homes to look for a job.
  I have heard from many of my constituents in Sacramento who are 
concerned about the high costs of services, and would be impacted by 
these cuts to Lifeline services.
  I have heard from a woman who is living off a fixed income and is 
counting her pennies each month to make ends meet. If her bill goes up 
``by one cent'', she says she will have to drop her service. The 
Lifeline program allows her to stay connected in an increasingly 
connected society.
  Another one of my constituents, who is disabled, can't afford in-home 
broadband services, and is forced to commute miles to the nearest 
library to access the Internet. But these all day excursions means that 
he misses important calls, and if something were to happen to him while 
he was out without a mobile phone, he would have no ability to call a 
friend, family member, or 911 for help. This Amendment would take that 
cell phone away.
  Moreover, this Amendment would not return any monies to the U.S. 
Treasury. The Universal Service Fund is supported entirely by telephone 
users--not taxpayers.
  In short, this Amendment picks technological winners and losers. It 
ignores input from legislators who have expertise on these issues. The 
House Energy and Commerce Committee plans to hold hearings on the 
Universal Service Fund this year, and the Federal Communications 
Commission announced its intention to review the Lifeline program.
  Finally, the amendment limits both economic opportunity and 
discourages employment security. Studies by the Opinion Research 
Corporation and MIT have found that cell phones are extremely important 
to an individual's economic productivity and earning power. Having 
access to a cell phone in order to get a ``call back'' is essential for 
Americans who are out of work. When the rest of America is cutting 
their landlines, this amendment is forcing the poorest among us to rely 
on a dying technology, which the free market has rejected.
  We should be expanding the lifeline program to broadband and mobile 
phones, technologies that are in high demand, and empower consumers to 
pursue a job, an education, or new career training.
  For all of these reasons, I strongly oppose this Amendment, and urge 
my colleagues to do the same.
  Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition to the FY 2011 
Continuing Resolution, which severely cuts critical funding for State 
and USAID and, if enacted would severely undermine U.S. development 
programs in Africa, U.S. National Security, and our domestic economy. 
The House bill provides State and USAID $43.2 billion.
  Development and diplomacy are the United States' first line of 
defense. Stable democracies and prosperous communities are less likely 
to pose a threat to their neighbors or to the United States.
  State and USAID work to help countries and communities in Africa and 
across the world to become more stable, democratic, and prosperous. 
When conflicts do arise, State and USAID work to transition countries 
from violence to stability to long-term development and to prevent 
struggling states from becoming failed states. Doing so reduces the 
burden on our military and enhances our diplomacy.
  The House bill would cut humanitarian assistance accounts by more 
than 40 percent below 2010 levels, devastating our ability to help 
victims of natural disasters and undermining U.S. leadership around the 
world.
  The International Disaster Assistance account allows us to respond to 
international disasters like the earthquake in Haiti and the flood in 
Pakistan. The House bill provides $429 million, taking this account 
back to 2008 levels--a 50 percent reduction to the 2010 level. This 
significant reduction will severely limit our ability to respond to 
natural disasters; we will simply be unable to respond to earthquakes 
and other disasters the way we did in Haiti.
  In Sudan, more than 1.6 million Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) 
in Darfur would not receive critical health care, access to water, or 
support with livelihood activities. Instead of reintegrating 
approximately 300,000 returnees to South Sudan in the wake of the 
referendum, USAID would be able to assist fewer than 150,000.
  In West Africa, proposed budget cuts would significantly hamper 
efforts to reduce and

[[Page 1859]]

maintain acute malnutrition rates below emergency levels in drought-
affected areas of Burkina Faso and Niger.
  The House mark will also end a cost-effective local and regional 
purchase program which enables the U.S. to feed hungry people by 
purchasing food locally at a significantly lower cost to the U.S. 
taxpayer.
  U.S. food aid continues to plays a critical role by helping people in 
need and supporting broader U.S. national security objectives by 
demonstrating the goodwill of the United States, especially in 
Afghanistan and Pakistan. U.S. food aid also supports domestic 
interests by the purchase of agricultural commodities from American 
farmers and the shipping of commodities abroad on U.S. ships.
  Reducing Title II food aid from the FY 2011 request of $1.690 billion 
to $1.003 billion forces dramatic cuts in food aid programs around the 
world, as well as decreasing purchases from U.S. farmers and the use of 
U.S. ships.
  This cut would require reductions in the largest emergency food aid 
programs, to include Sudan, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Given 
the average cost of emergency food aid of $44 per beneficiary, this 
would mean up to 15 million people might not receive such life-saving 
assistance due to the proposed reduction.
  The bill reduces funding for refugee relief by $670 million or 40 
percent below 2010 levels, representing a shift in U.S. policy of 
historical, unprecedented and devastating proportions. This reduction 
will drastically reduce the U.S. ability to protect and assist refugees 
in places of critical national security, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, 
Iraq and the Horn of Africa.
  For example, a reduction of this magnitude jeopardizes U.S. support 
for 1.6 million Afghan refugees living in Pakistan and another 100,000 
Afghan refugees returning to Afghanistan this year alone. Also, some 
230,000 Burmese refugees in Thailand, Malaysia, Bangladesh and India 
would be at risk. And, security in the Horn of Africa and supporting 
peace in Sudan would also be at risk as some 3,000-5,000 Somalis are 
fleeing into Kenya each month and 270,000 Darfuris in Sudan and Chad 
will go largely unassisted.
  The House proposal also makes deep cuts in Global Health programs and 
Development Assistance. Disease knows no borders. As such, USAID's 
programs to prevent and treat infectious diseases not only benefit the 
most vulnerable overseas, but also protect American citizens at home. 
Moreover, this Continuing Resolution would disproportionately cut 
programs that help the neediest people around the world by 25 percent 
versus an 11 percent reduction overall.
  The proposed CR level cuts the Global Health Initiative by $834 
million from 2010 levels. While these cuts would have miniscule value 
in the goal of balancing the budget, they will have real, immediate, 
and devastating impact on the poorest.
  I am deeply disappointed by the Appropriators' choice to step away 
from America's long-term humanitarian interests in improving and 
preserving lives around the world by helping people lift themselves out 
of poverty. There is living proof across the world that less than 1 
percent of the total federal budget has helped poor farmers learn to 
grow more food more efficiently, provided a lifeline to millions with 
HIV--including pregnant women whose babies can now be born HIV-free--
put millions of children under malaria-fighting bed nets by night and 
into schools by day, and strengthened America's friendships with 
millions of people, thus strengthening our own national security.
  The cut to the PEPFAR program is $513 million below 2010, a 10 
percent reduction. At this level, the U.S. will be unable to provide 
treatment to more than 700,000 people in desperate need of life-saving 
HIV/AIDS treatment.
  The House bill cuts USAID health programs by $320 million (-13 
percent) from 2010 levels and nearly 30 percent below the 2011 request. 
Reducing the USAID Global Health and Child Survival by this magnitude 
will have devastating effects on men, women, and children worldwide.
  Under the proposed CR levels, 5 million children and family members 
will be denied treatment or preventative interventions for malaria, 
leaving millions to die. Moreover, 43,000 children and family members 
with tuberculosis will be denied treatment, of which 12,000 will likely 
die.
  More than 16 million persons will be denied treatment for such 
debilitating conditions as blinding trachoma and onchocerciasisis. 
Efforts would be scaled back in at least 10 countries where we were on 
track to interrupt transmission within five years of up to four of the 
NTDs. USAID will be forced to sever agreements with four major 
pharmaceutical companies that donate hundreds of millions worth of 
drugs for NTD treatment programs.
  The bill would force USAID to scale back efforts in the 24 countries 
which collectively account for approximately one-half of all maternal 
and child deaths. 3,500 mothers will die, and more than 40,000 children 
under five--of which 16,000 are newborns--will perish in the absence of 
highly effective child survival interventions.
  More than 500 thousand undernourished children will be deprived of 
highly effective nutrition interventions (e.g., community management of 
acute malnutrition, micronutrient supplementation, and nutrition 
education leading to dietary diversity).
  Placing an all-account ceiling of $440 million on family planning and 
reproductive health in 2011 amounts to a 32 percent cut from FY 2010 
levels. This would result in 1.2 million more abortions, 28,000 
additional newborn deaths, and 4,000 additional maternal deaths--all 
stemming from denying 8.5 million women access to family planning 
services and by extension, 2.5 million additional unintended 
pregnancies.
  The House FY 2011 Continuing Resolution would reduce the Development 
Assistance account by nearly $750 million from 2010 levels, a 30 
percent reduction, and $1.2 billion from the 2011 request (-40 
percent).
  Absent deep cuts to other ongoing programs, in areas such as 
education, microfinance, and water, the House bill would virtually 
eliminate funding for the Feed the Future Initiative and the Global 
Climate Change Initiative.
  With world food prices at their highest since the 2007/2008 global 
food riots, and in view of the political volatility that food prices 
recently helped spark in the Middle East, it is more important than 
ever that the U.S. engage to improve long-term food security, and 
assist countries to avert short-term food crises. The recent events in 
Egypt that continue throughout the Middle East are a stark example of 
food insecurity's effect on stability.
  Decimating the President's Feed the Future (FtF) Initiative will mean 
that more than 4 million women, children, and family members--most 
small farmers--will go hungry this year, remaining desperately mired in 
poverty. More than 18 million will be at risk of chronic hunger over a 
five-year period. Ending funding for research and development under FtF 
will expose wheat crops--including here in the United States, and in 
Afghanistan and Pakistan--to the threats of U.G. 99 wheat stem rust 
strain.
  In just five out of our 20 focus countries, nearly 6.5 million small 
farmers, mostly poor and mostly women, will remain in the grips of 
hunger and poverty, unable to grow enough food to feed themselves and 
their families.
  Alternatively, spreading the 30 percent reduction across the 
Development Assistance Account would have significant negative effects 
on many congressional priorities including interventions in basic and 
higher education, microfinance, rule of law and governance, trade, and 
financial sector reform.
  Microfinance institutions in nearly 30 countries around the world 
will be forced to significantly scale back operations or shut their 
doors as funding dries up, resulting in 600,000 fewer women accessing 
financial services to sustain their businesses and contribute to the 
economic livelihoods of their families and communities.
  Over 20,000 Afghans will no longer have the tools they need to begin 
or sustain a microenterprise in the midst of the conflict, increasing 
the risk that they will turn to other, illicit economic livelihoods, 
like poppy production, to feed their families.
  As many as 300,000 rural microenterprises and over 600,000 
smallholder farmers will no longer be able to access the vital services 
and growing markets they need to generate cash income, break the cycle 
of subsistence agriculture, and chart a pathway out of poverty.
  A 30 percent cut in Development Assistance for water would mean that 
than 700,000 persons will be deprived access to clean drinking water 
and sanitation which, according to WHO, is one of the largest causes of 
mortality in the world--diarrhea-related disease kills nearly 2 million 
every year, 90 percent of whom are children under 5.
  Out of the approximately 64 million children benefitting from our 
education assistance worldwide, over 19 million will lose access to 
schooling opportunities. 10 million girls will be deprived access to 
basic education, causing further social and financial marginalization.
  I urge my colleagues to vote NO on the Continuing Resolution and any 
amendments that would strip critical and life saving programs in Africa 
and the developing world.
  Mr. CONNELLY of Virginia. Mr. Chair, I rise to strike the last word. 
This Continuing Resolution would cripple our Nation's transportation 
infrastructure and terminate crucial investments in public safety. It 
also would close

[[Page 1860]]

down community health centers across America, leaving many children and 
the elderly without vital health care. For example, in my district this 
proposed cut could close the Prince William Community Health Center. 
That would eliminate necessary health care for 19,000 of my 
constituents. In Louisa County, Virginia, which is represented by the 
new Majority Leader, this proposal could close the lone health facility 
where residents can receive care. Statewide, 93,000 Virginians would 
lose health care while 163 employees of community health clinics would 
lose their jobs. These clinics do not provide optional or cosmetic 
care. They offer the most basic services necessary for survival. These 
clinics, which serve virtually every Congressional district, serve some 
of the hardest working Americans who have been victims of long-term 
increases in health insurance premiums, which have put affordable care 
out of their reach.
  This Continuing Resolution demonstrates extraordinary callousness and 
hypocrisy on the part of the Republican leadership. They claim to be 
interested in the sanctity of human life while cutting off the only 
source of health care for tens of thousands of Virginians. Incredibly, 
the Republican leadership blocked an amendment by Representative 
Baldwin which would have restored $1 billion in funding for community 
health centers.
  I urge my colleagues to reject the unconscionable cuts in community 
health center funding and defeat this Continuing Resolution.
  Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Chair, I rise today to oppose amendment #380, proposed 
by our colleagues Mr. Reed and Mr. Graves, which eliminate the State 
Department Democracy Fund and the Human Rights and Democracy Fund 
(HRDF).
  The Human Rights and Democracy Fund funded by the Democracy Fund 
appropriation, finances innovative projects across the world to support 
the long-standing bipartisan U.S. foreign policy goals of defending 
human rights and advancing democratic values. Continued HRDF 
programming is vital to U.S. national security because democratic 
governance fosters more stable countries and regions, and free nations 
are more peaceful towards other democracies. Democracy promotion 
funding, started under President Reagan, has grown to its current 
consistent level of $70 million. Sustained congressional support for 
HRDF is critical.
  Promoting democracy and human rights is a cornerstone of U.S. foreign 
policy goals and the advancement of our national interests because it 
is the most effective long-term way to strengthen international 
stability. By reducing regional conflicts, countering terrorism and 
terror-supporting extremism, and extending peace and prosperity, the 
U.S. protects liberty and justice and the non-negotiable demands of 
human dignity.
  The Human Rights and Democracy Fund is the foundation for U.S. 
support for democracy and human rights across the globe. With HRDF, the 
U.S. addresses the most egregious of human rights abuses, open 
political space in struggling and nascent democracies and authoritarian 
regimes, promote religious freedom and tolerance, support civil 
society, protect at risk populations, and further global internet 
freedom and corporate social responsibility throughout the world. With 
HRDF, the United States was able to help counter extremism by 
supporting at risk populations in the Middle East, thereby reducing 
breeding grounds of future terrorists. DRL was able to provide 
thousands of Haitians with internet and radio access in the immediate 
aftermath of the Hurricane there.
  The Human Rights and Democracy Fund is enabling the U.S. to implement 
innovative programs across Africa. In Morocco, the Democracy Fund 
supports justice sector institutions to develop alternatives to pre-
trial detention of youth offenders that enable rehabilitation outside 
of prison. To stem gender-based violence (GBV) in the war-torn region 
of eastern Congo, the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human 
Rights, and Labor (DRL) initiative provided legal assistance to victims 
of sexual violence. As a result, 296 GBV survivors received legal 
counseling and 212 survivors received psychological counseling; 98 
criminal complaints were filed against suspected perpetrators; and an 
unprecedented 25 rape convictions were secured. In Sudan, in response 
to widespread violence against women in Darfur, DRL used Democracy Fund 
appropriations to provide critical services and community outreach to 
survivors of gender-based violence. Through the establishment of women 
centers, tens of thousands of women received an array of services, 
including literacy classes, health education, income-generating 
activities and treatment for sexual violence including medical, 
psychosocial, and case management services.
  Without HRDF, victims will lose valuable avenues for recourse, civil 
society activists will become increasingly isolated, women will become 
more vulnerable, and truth-telling journalists will be quieted. DRL 
would not be able to support efforts to push the Chinese government to 
more actively disclose food and drug safety information that directly 
affects the well-being of the American public; foster critical advances 
in the rule law, including criminal justice reform; support the growth 
of the NGO sector and its advocacy on behalf of the marginalized in 
society; or widen space for religious freedom. Without HRDF, DRL would 
not be able to help male civic and religious leaders be a powerful 
voice for the rights of women in Afghanistan.
  I urge my colleagues to support democracy and human rights in the 
developing world by voting NO on the Reed/Graves amendment #380.
  Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 1, the 
Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011. This ill conceived 
bill imposes draconian spending cuts that harm working families and, if 
implemented, could cause 1 million Americans to lose their jobs. Even 
worse, this bill hampers our country's ability to compete with other 
rising world powers, like China and India, by imposing draconian cuts 
to education, research, and infrastructure investments.
  At a time when education is critical to thriving in our global 
economy, the Republican led House is undermining America's future. 
Specifically, today's legislation would reduce the Pell Grants award by 
$845, causing over 9.4 million college students to suffer from 
increased levels of educational debt. Additionally, 218,000 children 
will be immediately dropped from Head Start program and 7,000 special 
education teachers will lose their jobs. House Republicans also want to 
reduce job training programs by $3.6 billion, cutting training for more 
the 200,000 Americans who lost their jobs in this ``Great Recession.''
  H.R. 1 will cut $740 million in WIC nutrition assistance and thus 
cause thousands of low-income children to lose access to nutritional 
foods and health coverage. During one of the coldest winters in memory, 
Republicans propose to cut $400 million to the low-Income Home Energy 
Assistance Program--literally leaving many of our fellow citizens out 
in the cold. They also would abolish Title X funding, thus cutting 
life-saving health services such as HIV testing, cancer screening, 
blood-pressure testing, and contraceptive services to more than five 
million low-income women, the majority of whom are uninsured. $1.3 
billion is cut from Community Health Centers, which would deny care to 
over 3.2 million Americans. Lastly, 75,000 homeless veterans would lose 
their housing vouchers under this bill.
  With the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the 
Democrats boldly showed that investing in America's infrastructure 
could put America to work, while laying the groundwork for future 
private sector investment. With this measure, Republicans would seek to 
undo that commitment and move our country backwards with billions in 
cuts to transportation funding. H.R. 1 would cut $2.5 from high speed 
rail projects that have been already awarded and eliminate funding for 
High Speed Rail Corridors. It would also eliminate 750 fewer wastewater 
and drinking water projects. 25,000 TIGER Surface Transportation 
Projects would be terminated.
  During the Great Depression, conservatives advocated for reduced 
spending at a time when the government needed greater investments in 
job creation. This unfortunate decision prolonged that economic malaise 
and resulted in untold levels of human suffering by millions of 
Americans. With H.R. 1, today's conservatives are simply repeating 
these failed economic policies. We cannot allow this. Republican ``No 
Jobs Agenda'' to succeed. I encourage my colleagues to oppose this 
legislation.
  Mr. BISHOP of Georgia. Mr. Chair, I rise today to oppose Rep. Scott 
Garrett's amendment to the FY2011 Continuing Resolution. His proposal 
to erase funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services will 
effectively eliminate all specific federal funding for libraries. Doing 
so would cut off access to information for millions of Americans.
  I believe our government needs to be more fiscally responsible, but 
as the son a librarian, I know the high cost these cuts will have in 
the long term. If we are serious about competing in a global economy, 
we must provide our children with the tools and resources to succeed, 
and cutting funds for our libraries will only hinder our chance to win 
the future.
  As a nation, we cannot afford to cut ourselves off from such 
necessary tools for economic recovery as books, periodicals, 
newspapers, the internet, and the bevy of information our public 
libraries provide. If funding for public libraries is removed, the 
Georgia Public Library Service will no longer be able to provide the 
following:

[[Page 1861]]

  The statewide network of high-speed Internet data lines providing 
access to all 400+ libraries in Georgia
  The award-winning, nationally-recognized PINES network and statewide 
library card system, which is used by more than 2.4 million Georgians 
and provides statewide lending via a shared database of more than 10 
million items
  A Statewide daily courier service for interlibrary loans to the 
headquarters of all 61 public library systems in Georgia--nearly 1 
million books shared in this way
  ``Talking book'' library services for the blind and other Georgians 
whose physical abilities require the use of books and magazines in 
audio format or in Braille--encompassing more than 1 million annual 
circulations
  The GALILEO online databases, which contain essential quality digital 
resources for students (kindergarten through higher education), 
teachers, professors and public library users
  The statewide Summer Reading Program, which served approximately 
450,000 children in 2010--an increase of more than 10 percent from 2009
  Shared services that provide necessary OCLC cataloging information 
and interlibrary loan access to every library in the state
  Continuing education programs and training for library staff who work 
in all types of libraries--public, university, K-12 and specialized--
and for trustees
  Consulting services to assist in improving local library operations 
in technology, governance, services to children, and other areas.
  As we bounce back from the recession, it is clear that more Georgians 
are turning to our public libraries for informational and educational 
needs. Libraries play a critical role in workforce recovery and 
economic development throughout our state. These funds allow Georgia's 
libraries to take advantage of economies of scale that benefit all 
libraries. The loss of these critical funds would force the elimination 
of services essential to Georgia residents of all ages--and this, Mr. 
Chair, is at a cost we cannot afford!
  Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Chair, I've come to the floor 
today to talk about a crisis our country is facing. I'm not here to 
talk about the deficit, which is also a problem, but one which pales in 
importance to the crisis of America's declining economic 
competitiveness.
  I say that the deficit problem pales in comparison to our declining 
competitiveness because without a robust and innovative economy, it 
will be next to impossible to ever truly reduce our national deficit.
  For some time, important leaders in our business and academic 
community have warned us about this crisis.
  In 2005, a National Academies panel chaired by former Lockheed Martin 
CEO Norm Augustine released the report, ``Rising Above the Gathering 
Storm.''
  This report warned that without a focused effort by the Federal 
Government, the future of American competitiveness was bleak.
  It recommended increased efforts in science, technology, engineering, 
and mathematics education, also referred to as STEM education, and 
increased federal investment in research and development.
  It's not a mystery why that distinguished group made those 
recommendations: it has long been clear that technological innovation 
creates jobs, and that Federal investments in R&D have had a major 
positive impact on innovation in this country.
  Our economic rivals understand all too well that America's great 
economic success has been a direct result of our innovation. And these 
competitors have begun to pour their resources into research and 
development and into STEM education.
  Those investments are bearing fruit:
  In 2004 China overtook the United States to become the world's 
leading exporter of information and communications technology goods.
  China, Japan, India, and South Korea all graduate more engineers each 
year than the United States.
  U.S. student scores in STEM achievement continue to decline in 
worldwide comparisons.
  So what do we do about it? Once the problem was identified, the 
Democratically-controlled Congress immediately focused on coming up 
with solutions.
  Over the past four years, we passed bills like the America COMPETES 
Act, which put NSF, NIST, and the Department of Energy's Office of 
Science on a doubling path.
  We've been changing the way America's children are taught science and 
math by putting in classrooms teachers who actually have a background 
and training in those fields, and we've been working to increase 
opportunities for minorities to contribute their talents to our 
scientific and technological initiatives.
  And we've been investing in clean energy technology development so 
that America can one day be an energy exporter instead of an energy 
importer.
  Unfortunately, all that work, and all that progress in keeping 
America competitive is about to be undone. My Republican colleagues 
have proposed a budget for the rest of 2011 which will severely wound 
our country's research and development capabilities, and stifle our 
innovation engine.
  Let me cite just a few of the consequences that would flow from 
enactment of this ill-considered CR:
  At the Department of Energy:
  Cuts to the Department of Energy will slow down the progress the 
country has made in demonstrating and deploying carbon capture and 
sequestration technologies, solar energy and cost-saving energy 
efficiency technologies.
  The cuts in the CR will force a number of world-class labs, which 
undertake research on cutting edge energy technologies to solve 
economic and environmental problems, to shut down.
  Thousands of scientific and technical staff at the national labs, 
universities and companies will be laid off, or worse, go to our 
competitors for support.
  This could lead to the United States being even more dependent on 
other countries for clean energy technologies.
  STEM education programs will be cut or eliminated at a time when 
China is graduating six engineers for every one of ours. We need to 
capitalize on the interests of our students who are ready and willing 
to solve our country's energy and environment problems.
  At the EPA:
  A reduction on the order of $3 billion to EPA's science programs will 
negatively impact our ability to find new and innovative solutions to 
21st century environmental and public health challenges.
  The proposed water research reductions will impact EPA's ability to 
ensure the Nation's water infrastructure is capable of the sustained 
delivery of safe water as well as the safe and sustainable removal and 
treatment of waste water.
  At NOAA:
  NOAA's weather satellite programs are already in trouble during this 
difficult economic time.
  Without proper additional funding of our satellite programs, we will 
be faced with less accurate and timely weather predictions. We are not 
just talking about taking our country back to 2008. We are talking 
about rewinding the clock two decades. We could soon be relying on 20 
year ago weather forecasting capabilities.
  I think we are all very well aware that over 70 percent of airplane 
flight delays are caused by weather. If FAA doesn't have the weather 
information it needs to safely and efficiently control the nation's air 
traffic, we face both increased delays and risks to the flying public.
  We are potentially putting our lives, property, and critical 
infrastructure in danger. Without accurate and timely information, we 
would no longer see the 2-3 day advance warnings of extreme weather 
events on which we depend.
  This will also make it extremely difficult to conduct safe and 
strategic evacuations of American people during extreme weather events, 
which have been faced by many regions of our country in recent years.
  I could go on and on and cite some of the adverse consequences to 
each of our agencies and to vital governmental activities that will 
occur if this CR is adopted, but I think Members now have an idea of 
what is at stake.
  And make no mistake, this is job-killing CR.
  What makes this bill so dangerous is that it won't just kill jobs 
today. It won't just kill jobs this year. These cuts to our research 
and development funding will kill jobs for years to come.
  As President Obama noted in his State of the Union address, if an 
airplane is overloaded, you don't lighten the load by cutting off the 
engines.
  That's exactly what this Republican budget plan does: it cuts the 
engine off of our economy.
  Unfortunately, our children and our grandchildren will be the ones 
who ultimately pay the price for these efforts when they inherit an 
America that is no longer the world leader in innovation.
  I urge my colleagues to reject the cuts being proposed in the 
Republican CR. We can do better.
  Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Chair, I rise to express my strong opposition to 
amendment #287, introduced by our colleague Rep. McClintock of 
California. Amendment #287 would eliminate all funding for the Inter 
American Foundation in the proposed FY2011 Continuing Resolution. This 
devastating cut would have severe

[[Page 1862]]

immediate and long term impacts on the most vulnerable communities who 
share the same hemisphere as the United States.
  The United States has a vested interest in assuring that the poorest 
communities have the resources to organize, develop, and advance. The 
IAF works to promote economic opportunity, reduce poverty and foster 
civic and social inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean, 
consistent with U.S. foreign policy and national security interests.
  Without such proactive measures in international economic opportunity 
and development, the United States would cripple its own internal 
interest in the areas of drug trafficking, immigration, and maintaining 
its role as a promoter of democracy globally. There are many adverse 
consequences if programs like IAF ceases to exist. Studies show that 
farmers and agricultural workers of poverty-stricken communities 
migrate far from their families to make a living, and in many Latin 
American countries, like Colombia, this often means driving small 
farmers into illicit coca cultivation. Cutting IAF funds will aid in 
forcing men and women into the dangerous, yet lucrative work of 
narcotics production just to provide basic needs for their families.
  There is a myth that foreign assistance using public funds is 
ineffective and inefficient. That is farther from the truth. IAF is a 
conduit to creating future allies; future business partners, and future 
collaborators. Investing in self-help solutions which enable the poor 
to help themselves ultimately creates an intimate bond between nations. 
As our world becomes more competitive in everything from education to 
science to defense, we must not cut ourselves off from future 
relationships by cutting developing countries off from aid today.
  One of the many countries that would be affected by this cut is 
Haiti. Haiti is a nation that suffered one of the greatest devastations 
in history, with a 7.4 magnitude earthquake that killed over 200,000 
people, affected over 2 million Haitians, and destroyed their capitol, 
Port au Prince. While much aid has gone towards immediate disaster 
relief, the United States seeks to gain enormously by supporting 
sustainable solutions that IAF currently helps fund.
  IAF provides grants for the Haitian Partners for Christian 
Development--an organization that continues its services as a business 
incubator, which includes reaching women entrepreneurs and supporting 
them with business endeavors. Such seed money literally produces 
economic leaders which are necessary to shape the Haiti of tomorrow.
  Through a single grant, IAF also has a project which provides farmers 
displaced by the 2010 earthquake with agricultural training and 
technical assistance, as well as give education scholarships to 100 
displaced children, and distributes food to another 150 quake victims.
  With all the tremors the people of Haiti still are enduring, IAF is 
essential to ensuring these survivors do not experience a social 
aftershock due to cutting funding that ultimately has long-term 
benefits for both Haiti and the United States.
  Being the leaders in international economic empowerment today is a 
wise investment for tomorrow.
  I urge you to join me in opposing this amendment.
  Mr. HOLT. Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition to the amendments 
offered by Representative Garrett to eliminate funding for the National 
Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, 
as well as the amendments by Representatives Walberg and Canseco to 
decrease such funding.
  As a member of the Congressional Arts Caucus, I believe that the arts 
play a crucial role in our society, enhancing our creativity, promoting 
critical aspects of education, and providing Americans with the 
opportunity to view works of beauty and personal expression. 
Furthermore, the arts inspire our children to explore their own 
creativity and encourage positive development in the course of their 
educational careers. The arts are a fundamental component of our 
society and warrant federal funding.
  As noted by Americans for the Arts in its report Arts and Economic 
Prosperity III, across the county ``nonprofit arts and culture industry 
generates $166.2 billion in economic activity every year.'' The report 
also details that the arts support 5.7 million jobs and generate $29.6 
billion in government revenue. In my district in New Jersey alone, as 
of January 2010, there were 1,841 arts-related businesses employing 
almost 10,000 people. So not only are the arts good for our cultural 
development as a society, they are good for our economic development as 
well.
  I have heard from hundreds of my constituents on this matter, and 
nearly every one has pleaded with me to preserve as much funding as 
possible for the arts. As one of them said, poignantly, ``a nation 
without culture is a nation without a soul.''
  I strongly oppose any cuts to the National Endowment for the Arts and 
the National Endowment for the Humanities, and I urge my colleagues to 
oppose the amendments offered by Representatives Garrett, Walberg and 
Canseco on this subject.
  Mrs. LUMMIS. Mr. Chair, I along with Representative Gwen Moore from 
Wisconsin, submit the following statement on H.R. 1, the Full-Year 
Continuing Appropriations Act for 2011.
  As Co-Chairs of the bipartisan Women's Caucus, the Special 
Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is 
important to us. It is a program that has and continues to serve over 9 
million women, infants, and children monthly, providing food, education 
and access to health care. Many of the women and children who use these 
services are at-risk for poor nutritional diets and WIC provides them 
with greater access to nutritious foods as well as preventative 
services to improve their families' health over the long-term.
  At caucus meetings, we have discussed this program and the impact of 
reduced spending on women across the nation. It is important for this 
Congress to advance ways in the upcoming budget that can ensure 
benefits are provided to constituencies with the greatest need.
  WIC is the largest discretionary program under the United States 
Department of Agriculture (USDA), and as such has been targeted for 
cuts in the continuing resolution. For the pregnant, postpartum and 
breast-feeding women who participate in WIC, as well as for their 
under-five children, we look forward to working together on solutions 
acceptable to both sides of the aisle.
  Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Chair, I rise today to oppose the Barletta amendments 
and the Weiner-Chaffetz-Cravaack amendment to eliminate funding for the 
U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP), should they be offered during floor 
consideration of H.R. 1.
  The elimination of USIP would have strong, adverse impact on 
America's security interests. USIP is an important national security 
actor. The U.S. Government must have options for resolving 
international conflict other than military action. USIP--created by 
Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan--is the only 
independent U.S. Government actor that is dedicated solely to conflict 
prevention and resolution.
  USIP is the critical bridge between governmental and non-governmental 
actors to promote peace in volatile conflicts. Their Center for 
Mediation and Conflict Resolution conducts work in a number of critical 
conflict zones in Africa, Middle East, and across the globe:
  USIP is addressing a series of challenges and opportunities facing 
the parties to the Arab-Israeli conflict, with a focus on institutional 
capacity to make compromises, the capacity of the Israeli and 
Palestinian publics to build consensus and support for a negotiated 
agreement, and the role of U.S. policymakers in encouraging and 
supporting these efforts toward a peaceful resolution.
  USIP is addressing several issues in Nigeria, a country rife with 
conflicts over petroleum resources and religion. Amidst this situation, 
the Center is working on peace efforts for the Niger Delta region, 
including working collaboratively with local governments, oil 
companies, and Nigerian NGOs.
  For nearly two decades, the United States Institute of Peace has been 
working in Sudan on peace processes. Its knowledge and expertise has 
helped shape the environment that has contributed, so far, to a 
relatively peaceful outcome of the referendum. USIP's work on 
prevention, power-sharing, constitutional reform and natural resources 
has made a critical difference in the country's local capacity.
  USIP produces timely expert analysis on issues critical to 
policymakers and conflict prevention practitioners. Just last week USIP 
published the attached PEACE Brief report on the political stalemate in 
Cote d'Ivoire following the November 28, 2010 election and the broader 
issue of preventing electoral violence in Africa.
  USIP is a small, agile center of innovation in support of America's 
national security interests in supporting peace and democracy in Africa 
and across the globe. USIP has been a very useful resource to 
policymakers for decades, we can not eliminate this critical 
institution.
  I urge my colleagues to join me in voting ``no'' on these amendments.

 [From the PeaceBrief--United States Institute of Peace, Feb. 7, 2011]

    Cote d'Ivoire's Political Stalemate: A Symptom of Africa's Weak 
                         Electoral Institutions

                           (By Dorina Bekoe)


                                Summary

       The political stalemate in Cote d'Ivoire following the 
     November 28, 2010, presidential

[[Page 1863]]

     election continues. The majority of the international 
     community recognizes Alassane Ouattara as the winner, but 
     Laurent Gbagbo, the sitting president, insists he won. 
     Financial and diplomatic sanctions imposed on the Gbagbo 
     administration have thus far not forced Gbagbo from power.
       Maintaining international pressure and focus is critical to 
     resolving the Ivorian crisis, but African states are 
     increasingly divided on how to proceed.
       The power-sharing arrangement settled on by five African 
     nations in recent elections sets a dangerous precedent. 
     Losers with a strong militia may find it easier to use 
     threats of violence or actual violence to retain a critical 
     power role, thus subverting the intent of the election.
       African states will continue to experience violence during 
     elections until the security sector is reformed, states 
     refrain from holding elections while militias remain 
     mobilized and armed, elections can be clearly and 
     independently verified, institutions are politically 
     independent, and policies exist to discourage the violent 
     acquisition of power.
       Following the November 28, 2010, presidential runoff 
     election, the United Nations, charged with validating the 
     electoral process, along with the Independent Electoral 
     Commission, proclaimed Alassane Ouattara the winner, with 
     54.1 percent of the vote, over Laurent Gbagbo, the sitting 
     president, who had received 45.9 percent of the vote. 
     However, the Constitutional Council, headed by a Gbagbo 
     supporter, annulled results in 13 departments, alleging 
     fraud, and proclaimed Gbagbo the winner, with 51.4 percent of 
     the vote; Ouattara was given 48.5 percent.\1\ Both Ouattara 
     and Gbagbo were sworn in as president by their supporters.
       Most in the international and regional communities 
     recognized Ouattara as the winner, and the Economic Community 
     of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union (AU) 
     suspended Cote d'Ivoire from membership. Gbagbo's calls to 
     investigate election fraud, recount the ballots, and craft a 
     power-sharing arrangement have been rejected by the 
     international and regional institutions. Instead, ECOWAS and 
     AU envoys have urged Gbagbo to step down, financial and 
     travel sanctions have been placed on him and his associates, 
     and ECOWAS threatened military intervention.\2\ With the 
     military and the Young Patriots militia supporting Gbagbo and 
     the Forces Nouvelles rebels supporting Ouattara, many fear 
     that the failure of diplomacy and sanctions will reignite the 
     2002 civil war. While the central conundrum is how to 
     convince Gbagbo to leave office, larger questions loom about 
     the role of elections, the state of democratization, and the 
     strength of institutions in Africa.


            Power sharing in response to electoral violence

       In 2010, opposition candidates claimed electoral fraud and 
     irregularities in every presidential election in Africa--in 
     Guinea, Togo, Sudan, Burundi, Burkina Faso, Egypt, Comoros, 
     Tanzania, and Rwanda. Historically, in many cases of 
     electoral fraud, the challenger urges demonstrations or 
     refuses to recognize the results. In prolonged and violent 
     standoffs mediators have been dispatched, as occurred in 
     Guinea 2010, or a power-sharing agreement has been 
     negotiated, as occurred in Kenya and Zimbabwe in 2008, in 
     Togo in 2005, in Madagascar in 2002, and in Zanzibar in 2001.
       While the power-sharing arrangements in those five cases 
     aimed to stop the violence and address some of its underlying 
     causes, such arrangements could have longlasting 
     implications, and shorter, transitional measures might be 
     considered instead. Granted, an electorate can vote for a 
     power-sharing or proportionally representative government. 
     The problems arise when power sharing is imposed as a 
     solution when there is a clear winner (it weakens the purpose 
     of an election), when the winner cannot be determined (it can 
     encourage fraud and other obfuscation), or when there is 
     postelection violence (it may demonstrate that violence 
     pays). In this sense, Gbagbo's power-sharing proposal is 
     troubling and presents a critical philosophical decision for 
     Africa's institutions: how to react to candidates who respond 
     violently to election results. More broadly, how can leaders 
     be encouraged to accept defeat? How should the international 
     community respond to leaders who use violence to hold on to 
     power? For the remainder of 2011, Africa faces nearly 40 
     elections and referenda in 23 countries, including some that 
     have a history of violence and weak democratic institutions, 
     such as Nigeria, Zimbabwe, and the Democratic Republic of 
     Congo. A power-sharing norm, in the event of violently 
     contested election results, will be a dangerous precedent.


                    lessons from madagascar and togo

       In 2003, a disputed first-run election left Madagascar 
     divided between the supporters of incumbent president Didier 
     Ratsiraka and challenger Marc Ravalomanana. The Organization 
     of African Unity brokered the Dakar Agreement to pave the way 
     for a resolution.\3\ But when Ratsiraka refused to concede, 
     confrontations between the two escalated, and Ratsiraka fled 
     to France.\4\ Six years later the mayor of Antananarivo, 
     Andry Rajoelina, accused Ravalomanana's administration of 
     corruption and mismanagement and, with the military's 
     backing, assumed the presidency. Ravalomanana fled to South 
     Africa. Despite the absence of both Ratsiraka and 
     Ravalomanana, the political situation in Madagascar remains 
     unresolved. Efforts at resolution have floundered as the 
     international community, once united in bringing Rajoelina 
     and the former presidents together, has splintered, with 
     different countries considering their own national and 
     regional interests. Resolving the crisis is made more 
     difficult as the efforts of mediators are uncoordinated and 
     therefore weakened.\5\
       The response in Togo differed markedly. After long-serving 
     Gnassingbe Eyadema died in 2005, the parliament swore in his 
     son, Faure Gnassingbe, contravening the constitution. ECOWAS 
     and the International Organization of the Francophonie 
     suspended Togo. After an enormous amount of international 
     pressure and mediation, Gnassingbe stepped aside to allow 
     elections, as required by the constitution. In this case, the 
     concerted pressure of the international and regional 
     communities provided space for the resolution of the crisis.
       The Ivorian situation must not slip from international 
     attention. The financial and travel sanctions have begun to 
     constrain Gbagbo and his administration, but he remains in 
     place. Only resolute diplomatic pressure and adherence to 
     sanctions will eventually dislodge Gbagbo and avert conflict. 
     Yet the AU's reversal on military intervention, the refusal 
     by Ghana and South Africa to take a stance for one candidate 
     or the other, and Uganda's Yoweri Museveni's statement that 
     the votes should be investigated show a divided region. 
     Furthermore, other African countries are receiving Gbagbo's 
     representatives, in a break with the initial practice of 
     recognizing only Ouat-tara's representatives; they were 
     recently in Kenya to explain their reasons for rejecting 
     Ouattara's victory claims. These developments threaten a 
     swift resolution to this stalemate and portend a long period 
     of instability.


         the role of ivorian civil society in reducing tension

       Political and geographic divisions make it difficult for 
     Ivoirian civil society to act as a joint force for peace. 
     Moderate voices, willing to bridge regional and political 
     divides, are not being heard.\6\ It is important to note that 
     Ouattara did not obtain a landslide victory. A substantial 
     number of voters, nearly 46 percent, supported Gbagbo. Their 
     reasons for supporting Gbagbo reflect the existing regional, 
     ethnic, and religious divisions in Cote d'Ivoire. Whether 
     Gbagbo or Ouattara emerges as winner from the current 
     stalemate, the next president will face a sharply divided 
     electorate that challenges his rule. Thus, this election, 
     which was meant to repair the divisions between the north and 
     the south, will have failed to do so. At the very least, a 
     key ingredient for avoiding war in Cote d'Ivoire is to 
     reconcile these divided communities. Civil society's moderate 
     voices can play a critical role in starting the 
     reconciliation process.\7\ Moderates can also make joint 
     statements and appearances and participate in the current 
     mediation process between Gbagbo and Ouattara. The 
     international community should help by emphasizing the 
     importance of moderates and building their capacity and 
     infrastructure to succeed.


               preventing violence in electoral disputes

       Cote d'Ivoire's crisis, as well as others, could have been 
     avoided if the militias had demobilized and if clear rules 
     for the security services had existed, methods for verifying 
     elections were clear and disputes could have been credibly 
     resolved, and Africa's institutions had implementable tools 
     for discouraging electoral violence.


                    the role of the security forces

       In many countries, security services remain politicized and 
     are used to crush demonstrations and intimidate the 
     opposition. This was clearly seen in the postelection 
     demonstrations in Ethiopia in 2005, where approximately 
     30,000 opposition members were arrested.\8\ In Cote d'Ivoire 
     as many as 30 demonstrators died at the hands of state 
     security services during a public demonstration.\9\ Reform 
     and depoliticization of the security forces would reduce the 
     chances of violence.


               disarmament and demobilization of militias

       Repeated attempts to disarm the militia ahead of the 
     elections in Cote d'Ivoire failed. The program was poorly 
     funded, and there were identifiable security, financial, and 
     political benefits for the militia to remain intact. Removing 
     those incentives would have spurred demobilization. Now, with 
     Ouattara and Gbagbo in control of arms, the prospect of 
     violence increases dramatically should diplomacy fail. A 
     similar outcome occurred in the Republic of Congo after the 
     1993 parliamentary elections when the three political party 
     leaders each claimed victory while still in charge of their 
     respective militias. The clashes in the ensuing several 
     months left 2,000 dead.\10\ Elections should not proceed 
     while candidates remain in control of militias.


               clear, independent verification of results

       The UN Mission in Cote d'Ivoire (ONUCI) was charged with 
     certifying the electoral

[[Page 1864]]

     process. It was to ``ensure that all stages of the electoral 
     process are carried out in accordance with recognized 
     standards . . . [and] not allow the results to be contested 
     in a non-democratic way or to be compromised.''\11\ This 
     language left room for contestation, which is exactly what 
     happened, when the electoral commission, which is charged 
     with announcing the provisional results, and the 
     Constitutional Council, which is charged with verifying the 
     electoral commission's results, disagreed. ONUCI's role as 
     certifier does not explicitly state that its judgment is 
     final. This ambiguity has been exploited in the Ivorian 
     crisis. Similarly, in Kenya the procedures in place could not 
     determine which candidate had won or whether the electoral 
     process had been fair, fueling the tension. Strengthening and 
     clarifying the processes and institutions that verify an 
     election will greatly reduce the chances and claims of fraud.


                      fair hearings for grievances

       Credible means of assessing an election should be 
     buttressed by independent institutions for addressing 
     grievances. Cote d'Ivoire's politically biased institutions 
     do not foster this confidence. In Kenya's 2007 elections and 
     Togo's 2010 elections, opposition leaders refused to use 
     existing institutions, which they deemed biased, to resolve 
     their grievances, opting instead for street protests. Without 
     independent institutions, public protests will increase the 
     chances of violence, especially when security forces are 
     politicized.


              sanctions for violence in electoral disputes

       There is currently no continental stance or policy on 
     discouraging electoral violence. Politicians in Kenya, 
     Zimbabwe, Togo, and Zanzibar were all rewarded with power-
     sharing agreements when they contested elections violently. 
     Elsewhere, violent perpetrators were not prosecuted when the 
     country returned to political normalcy. This sends a message 
     that violence is costless and sometimes pays. Africa's 
     institutions must develop clear and implementable sanctions 
     against politicians who use violence to secure elections.


                               conclusion

       Other, country-specific ways to increase an election's 
     credibility and transparency certainly exist. However, basic 
     measures such as depoliticizing the security services, 
     disarming militias, clearly and independently verifying 
     elections, establishing independent institutions for 
     redressing grievances, and discouraging the use of violence 
     in elections can help prevent violent responses to electoral 
     results. Cote d'Ivoire had none of these measures in place. 
     Now, with the threat of violence looming, the international 
     and regional communities must remain unified in their 
     approach and push for the inclusion of moderate civil society 
     voices to ensure the resolution of the crisis.


                                endnotes

       \1\West Africa Network for Peacebuilding--Cote d'Ivoire, 
     ``Troisieme Rapport de l'Observatoire de la Vie Politique et 
     des Medias en Periode Electorale'' (Abidjan: WANEP--Cote 
     d'Ivoire, January 8, 2011).
       \2\ This threat was reversed at the African Union's summit 
     on January 28-31, 2011.
       \3\ Dakar Agreement, http://www.afrol.com/Countries/
Madagascar/documents/accord_
     dakar.htm.
       \4\Ofeibea Quist-Arcton, ``Africa: OAU Stands Aloof on 
     Madagascar, Despite Departure of Ratsiraka,'' Allafrica.com, 
     July 5, 2002, http://allafrica.com/stories/200207050825.html.
       \5\ International Crisis Group, ``Madagascar: Le Crise a un 
     Tournant Critique?,'' Africa Report 166, November 18, 2010, 
     4-6.
       \6\ ``Cote d'Ivoire: Voices of Reason Sidelined in the 
     Crisis,'' IRINNews.org, January 26, 2011, http://
www.irinnews.org/report.spx?ReportID=91733.
       \7\ Ibid.
       \8\ Lahra Smith, ``Political Violence and Uncertainty In 
     Ethiopia,'' U.S. Institute of Peace Special Report no. 192 
     (Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace, August 2007), 7.
       \9\ Amnesty International, ``Cote d'Ivoire: Injured 
     Protestors Denied Medical Care,'' Allafrica.com, December 20, 
     2010, http://allafrica.com/stories/201012200899.html.
       \10\ U.S. Department of State, ``Congo Human Rights 
     Practices, 1994'' (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, 
     February 1995), sect. 1(a), http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/erc/
democracy/1994_hrp_report/94hrp_report_africa/Congo.html.
       \11\ UN Mission in Cote d'Ivoire (ONUCI), ``The 
     Certification of Elections in Cote d'Ivoire,'' Resolution 
     1765, adopted by the UN Security Council on July 16, 2007, 
     http://www.onuci.org/pdf/faqcertificationen.pdf.

  Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chair, both supporters and opponents of H.R. 1 claim 
that is a serious attempt to reduce federal spending, however, an 
examination of the details of the bill call that claim into question. 
For one thing, the often-cited assertion that H.R. 1 reduces spending 
by $99 billion is misleading as the $99 billion figure represents the 
amount that H.R. 1 reduces spending from the President's proposed 
Fiscal Year 2011 budget, not reductions in actual spending. Trying to 
claim credit for a reduction in spending based on cuts in proposed 
spending is like claiming someone is following a diet because he had 5 
pieces of pizza when he intended to have 10 pieces.
  In fact, H.R. 1 reduces federal spending by $66 billion. This may 
seem like a lot to the average American but in the context of an 
overwhelming trillion-dollar budget and a national debt that could 
exceed 100 percent of GNP in September, this cut is barely even a drop 
in the bucket.
  One reason that H.R. 1 does not cut spending enough is that too many 
fiscal conservatives continue to embrace the fallacy that we can 
balance the budget without reducing spending on militarism. Until 
Congress realizes the folly of spending trillions in a futile attempt 
to impose democracy on the world we will never be able to seriously 
reduce spending.
  Congress must not only reject the warfare state, it must also reject 
the welfare state. H.R. 1 is more aggressive in ending domestic 
spending than foreign spending, and does zero out some objectionable 
federal programs such as AmeriCorps. However, H.R. 1 leaves most of the 
current functions of the federal government undisturbed. This bill thus 
continues the delusion that we can have a fiscally responsible and 
efficient welfare state.
  Mr. Chair, the failure to even attempt to address the serious threat 
the welfare-warfare state poses to American liberty and prosperity is 
the main reason why supporters of limited government and individual 
liberty should ultimately find H.R. 1 unsatisfactory. Only a rejection 
of the view that Congress can run the economy, run our lives, and run 
the world will allow us to make the spending reductions necessary to 
avert a serious financial crisis. This does not mean we should not 
prioritize and discuss how to gradually transition away from the 
welfare state in a manner that does not harm those currently relying on 
these programs. However, we must go beyond balancing the budget to 
transitioning back to a free society, and that means eventually placing 
responsibility for social welfare back in the hands of individuals and 
private institutions. Despite the overheated rhetoric heard during the 
debate, H.R. 1 is a diversion from the difficult task of restoring 
constitutional government and a free economy and society.
  Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition to Amendment No. 
262, introduced by our colleague Representative Latta of Ohio, should 
it be offered during floor consideration of H.R. 1. Amendment No. 262 
would eliminate all funding for international family planning programs 
in the proposed FY 2011 Continuing Resolution. This devastating cut 
would have severe immediate and long term impacts on women and their 
families in the world's poorest countries.
  Contrary to the rhetoric we are hearing from some of our colleagues, 
U.S. international family planning assistance in fact helps to reduce 
unintended pregnancies and abortions in the developing world. According 
to Population Action International, cutting this funding would result 
in: 7.8 million more unintended pregnancies; 3.7 million more 
abortions; 87,000 additional newborn deaths; and 12,000 additional 
maternal deaths.
  Moreover, this amendment would turn back the clock on U.S. 
investments in the global fight against HIV/AIDS. The integration of 
family planning and HIV/AIDS services is a vital and cost-effective way 
to prevent HIV infection, including through mother-to-child 
transmission. At the same cost, family planning services can avert 
nearly 30 percent more HIV-positive births than use of the nevirapine 
prophylaxis by HIV-positive pregnant women. A recent study found that, 
although PEPFAR has been associated with a reduction in HIV-related 
deaths, trends of increasing adult prevalence rates continue unabated. 
However, preventing unintended pregnancies, which is an international 
pillar of preventing mother to child transmission (PMTCT) programming, 
continues to receive insufficient attention in AIDS programs. The 
Guttmacher Institute noted in their report Hiding in Plain Sight: The 
Role of Contraception in Preventing HIV that helping HIV-positive women 
avoid unwanted pregnancies not only lowers the rate of new infections, 
but does so at a relatively low cost.
  I hope that you will join me in opposing this amendment, should it be 
offered.

            [From the Guttmacher Policy Review, Winter 2008]

   Hiding in Plain Sight: The Role of Contraception in Preventing HIV

                          (By Susan A. Cohen)

       As Congress embarks on the process of reauthorizing the 
     U.S. program to fight HIV and AIDS, and as other global 
     donors recalibrate levels and allocations of funding for HIV/
     AIDS programs, prevention seems to be making a comeback. At 
     the inception of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS 
     Relief (PEPFAR) five years ago, both the funding and the 
     programmatic emphasis tilted heavily toward treatment. Yet, 
     the rate of new

[[Page 1865]]

     HIV infection continues to outpace the world's ability to 
     deliver antiretroviral therapy, despite recent advances in 
     access to such medications. A public health consensus is 
     emerging, therefore, in favor of realigning the balance 
     between treatment and prevention efforts.
       Refocusing the priority on prevention is long overdue, as 
     is an acknowledgment, especially within Congress, that HIV 
     prevention cannot be accomplished with a disproportionate 
     emphasis on abstinence. Indeed, preventing the sexual 
     transmission of HIV requires going beyond the necessary but 
     hardly sufficient strategy of ABC: abstain, be faithful, use 
     condoms. It also requires increasing AIDS awareness through 
     counseling and testing programs, investing in programs 
     promoting the empowerment of women and girls, and increasing 
     access to male circumcision. Other critical prevention 
     interventions include ensuring a clean blood supply and clean 
     medical injections, needle exchange programs for intravenous 
     drug users and preventing the ``vertical'' transmission of 
     HIV from a pregnant woman to her newborn infant.
       Largely overlooked as an HIV prevention strategy, however, 
     is the simple and low-cost act of helping HIV-positive women 
     who do not want to have a child to avoid an unintended 
     pregnancy through increased access to contraceptive services. 
     Ward Cates, president for research of Family Health 
     International (FHI), has dubbed contraception the ``best-kept 
     secret in HIV prevention,'' and certainly, the significant 
     contribution of unintended pregnancy prevention toward 
     reducing the perinatal transmission of HIV has gone virtually 
     unrecognized. Yet, a revitalized and more robust effort 
     focused on HIV prevention cannot afford not to fully 
     capitalize on the critical role of contraceptive services in 
     fighting AIDS.


                  The Need for Progress on Prevention

       Women of reproductive age comprise more than half of the 33 
     million people currently living with HIV around the world. 
     The vast majority of these women live in Sub-Saharan Africa, 
     and thus, it is not surprising that 90% of the 2.5 million 
     children younger than 15 living with HIV live there as well. 
     Almost all of these children became infected through their 
     mothers during pregnancy, birth or breastfeeding.
       An HIV-positive woman about to give birth can dramatically 
     reduce the likelihood of transmitting the virus to her 
     newborn by delivering in a hospital or a primary care setting 
     where she and her infant can receive even a single dose of 
     the anti-retroviral drug nevirapine. However, the challenges 
     to delivering even this seemingly simple prevention of 
     mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) service are substantial, 
     especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Pregnancy itself does not 
     usually drive women, especially those in rural areas, to 
     facilities where they could receive pre-natal care and, 
     potentially, an HIV test. In addition, many pregnant women 
     may not want to know their HIV status for fear of public 
     disclosure and the stigma that often results. Considering the 
     difficulties of delivering services to HIV-positive pregnant 
     women, and the simple fact that most women who are HIV-
     positive do not know it, it is not entirely surprising that 
     only 11% of all theoretically eligible women in poor 
     countries are benefiting from any PMTCT intervention. And 
     without intervention, about one-third of babies born to HIV-
     positive women likely will become infected.
       A long-standing goal of global prevention efforts, 
     therefore, is to ramp up PMTCT efforts so that more pregnant 
     women are tested and that those who are positive receive the 
     treatment that they and their infant will need. PMTCT 
     programs justifiably enjoy broad political support and are 
     certain to continue to be a funding priority within the U.S. 
     global AIDS effort.
       The United States does recognize the importance of at least 
     establishing linkages between PMTCT and family planning 
     programs, since PEPFAR requires family planning counseling 
     and referral as one of four elements comprising the minimum 
     package of services for preventing mother-to-child 
     transmission. However, a high-level consultation sponsored by 
     the World Health Organization (WHO} and the United Nations 
     Population Fund in 2004 went considerably further, concluding 
     that investing solely in narrowly defined PMTCT programs will 
     not succeed in dramatically reducing the incidence of 
     perinatal transmission. Rather, the Glion [Switzerland] Call 
     to Action on Family Planning and HIV/AIDS in Women and 
     Children emphasized that all four elements of the WHO 
     approach to preventing HIV infection in infants are 
     essential. PMTCT programs are key, but so are primary 
     prevention of HIV infection in women; the provision of care, 
     treatment and support for women living with HIV and their 
     families; and prevention of unintended pregnancies among 
     women living with HIV. Of these, the significant role that 
     unintended pregnancy prevention already plays--and the much 
     greater role it potentially could play--in averting new cases 
     of HIV has been least recognized and supported.
       According to a 2007 Guttmacher Institute study, one in four 
     married women in Sub-Saharan Africa is sexually active and 
     does not want to have a child or another child in the next 
     two years, but is not using any method of contraception. As a 
     result, unintended births are common, and occur in the very 
     countries that are a focus of PEPFAR--countries in which HIV 
     prevalence is high and 60% of all adults living with HIV are 
     women (see table).
       Indeed, research into the HIV/AIDS health care system 
     reveals that the unmet need for contraception among HIV-
     positive women and women at high risk of HIV is even greater 
     than among women in the general population. According to a 
     study published in JAMA in 2006, 84% of the pregnancies among 
     women in three PMTCT programs in South Africa were 
     unintended. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and 
     Prevention reported earlier this year that 93% of the 
     pregnancies among pregnant women receiving antiretroviral 
     therapy in Uganda were unintended. And according to FHI 
     research from 2006 of women in HIV counseling and testing 
     clinics (where most women are HIV-negative but are at high 
     risk for HIV), substantial majorities in Kenya (59%), 
     Tanzania (66%), Zimbabwe (77%) and Haiti

                                          HIV AND UNINTENDED PREGNANCY
 [In PEPFAR countries, high HIV/AIDS rates coexist with a high unmet need for contraceptive services and a high
                                         incidence of unplanned births.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Unmet Need for     Unplanned         HIV/AIDS
              PEPFAR Focus Countries (selected)                 Contraception,  Births (as % of     Prevalence
                                                                Married Women    total births)     (ages 15-49)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cote d'Ivoire................................................               28               28                7
Ethiopia.....................................................               34               35              1-3
Kenya........................................................               25               44                6
Mozambique...................................................               18               19               16
Namibia......................................................               22               45               20
Nigeria......................................................               17               14                4
Rwanda.......................................................               38               39                3
South Africa.................................................               15               53               19
Tanzania.....................................................               22               22                7
Uganda.......................................................               35               38                7
Zambia.......................................................               27               39               17
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Guttmacher Institute, 2007, and PEPFAR, 2007. (92%) said they did not want another child in the next two
  years.

                    Contraception as HIV Prevention

       To be sure, many women living with HIV do want to have a 
     child or another child, notwithstanding pressure to forego 
     childbearing from family members, people in their community 
     and health care providers. And, in fact, HIV-positive women 
     are likely to be able to sustain a healthy pregnancy and 
     safely deliver a healthy baby if they can avail themselves of 
     appropriate therapy (related article, Fall 2006, page 17). 
     Nonetheless, many HIV-positive women who know their HIV 
     status seek out contraceptive services specifically because 
     of their status--because they fear infecting their baby if 
     they become pregnant or leaving behind children, whether HIV-
     positive or not, as orphans. And many more women seeking 
     contraceptives services are, in fact, HIV-positive but do not 
     know it.
       FHI researchers estimate that if the HIV-positive women in 
     Sub-Saharan Africa who are currently using modern 
     contraceptive methods to prevent unintended pregnancy were 
     not able to do so, the number of HIV-positive births in the 
     region would be 31% higher than it is now. This would 
     translate to 153,000 more HIV-infected unplanned births each 
     year--or 419 more per day. Researchers at the Johns Hopkins 
     University Bloomberg School of Public Health and WHO 
     published an analysis in AIDS in 2004 demonstrating that even 
     a modest decline in the number of unintended pregnancies 
     among HIV-positive women in Botswana, Cote d'lvoire, Kenya, 
     Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe could lead to 
     the prevention of the same number of births of HIV-positive 
     infants as prevented by the current PMTCT programs in these 
     countries. ``It is clear from this analysis,'' they wrote, 
     ``that only a combined approach utilizing all three 
     intervention components simultaneously [reducing HIV 
     infection among women, reducing unintended pregnancy and 
     increasing the reach of PMTCT programs] will result in 
     significant reductions'' in new HIV infections among infants.
       Helping HIV-positive women avoid unwanted pregnancies not 
     only lowers the rate of new infections, but does so at a 
     relatively low cost. The U.S. Agency for International 
     Development (USAID) examined PMTCT programs in the 14 
     countries comprising the Bush administration's original 
     initiative starting in 2002 aimed at preventing mother-to-
     child transmission. USAID projected that over a five-year 
     period, adding family planning services to PMTCT programs 
     could prevent almost twice the number of infections to 
     children, and nearly four times the number of deaths to 
     children, as PMTCT alone could prevent (see chart). In 
     addition, a 2006 analysis by FHI concluded that for the same 
     cost, voluntary family planning services can avert not nearly 
     30% more HIV-positive births--that would have been 
     unintended--than averted by identifying HIV-positive women 
     during their pregnancy and providing nevirapine.
       Greater access to contraceptive services then--whether 
     among women in HIV treatment programs, PMTCT programs or 
     counseling and testing programs, or among women in 
     traditional family planning programs in high-HIV-prevelence 
     countries--is a

[[Page 1866]]

     ``win-win-win situation.'' it increases the chances that 
     women living with HIV can prevent future pregnancies they do 
     not want, thereby reducing the incidence of perinatal 
     transmission and the number of potential child deaths, and it 
     achieves these humanitarian ends in a highly cost-effective 
     way.


                   Implications for Prevention Policy

       Outside the context of HIV prevention, it is indisputable 
     that the health, social and economic benefits of investing in 
     contraceptive services--for women, their families and their 
     communities--are multiple and varied. By preventing 
     pregnancies that are too early, too late or too closely 
     spaced, contraception reduces the likelihood of infant 
     mortality. And by helping women to avoid high-risk 
     pregnancies and the need for unsafe abortions, it decreases 
     the risk of maternal death or disability. A woman who can 
     determine the timing and spacing of her children increases 
     her own and her existing family's opportunities for 
     educational, social and economic advancement. Moreover, the 
     evidence is compelling that increasing access to family 
     planning programs also amplifies the overall effort to slow 
     the rate of new HIV infection.
       Yet, despite the ever-rising demand for contraceptive 
     services and the fact that a woman's ability to control her 
     own fertility is integrally linked to almost all other 
     aspects of health and development, U.S. funding for family 
     planning has been lagging. Funding for family planning 
     programs in developing countries through USAID peaked at 
     about $550 million at the time of the international 
     Conference on Population and Development in Cairo in 1994 and 
     early 1995. It dropped precipitously in 1997, after control 
     of Congress shifted to lawmakers hostile to sexual and 
     reproductive health programs, plummeting to below $400 
     million. By 2001, the final year of the Clinton 
     administration, funding had regained some ground ($446 
     million), but that level has remained essentially constant 
     ever since.
       Clearly, USAID funding for family planning programs should 
     be increased--both on their traditional merits and, in high-
     prevalence countries, as an HIV strategy. At the same time, 
     as global donors to the fight against AIDS reconsider the new 
     priority emphasis on prevention, particularly the United 
     States through the reauthorization of PEPFAR, it would be an 
     opportune moment to legitimize contraceptive services as the 
     core HIV prevention intervention they are. This would mean 
     ensuring that HIV treatment programs, where women already 
     predominate, also provide contraceptive services directly or 
     by referral to make it easier for HIV-positive women to 
     coordinate their treatment regimen with their pregnancy 
     prevention goals. Similarly, it would mean making family 
     planning services more widely available through PMTCT 
     programs, because many HIV-positive new mothers wish to delay 
     or prevent a subsequent pregnancy. Finally, in high-
     prevalence countries, it would mean promoting greater 
     integration of HIV counseling and testing services into 
     family planning programs, so that more sexually active women 
     at risk of HIV are likely to be tested and to receive 
     appropriate counseling and treatment.
       These strategies are more than academic. The Elizabeth 
     Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, the largest provider of 
     PMTCT services under PEPFAR, has been striving to incorporate 
     contraceptive services into its programs because ``care and 
     treatment staff members are uniquely positioned to address 
     HIV-positive women's needs concerning future pregnancy plans 
     and counsel them based on their social circumstances, health 
     status, and ART regimen.'' Indeed, as negotiations in 
     Congress got underway last month to reauthorize PEPFAR, the 
     Foundation wrote to the House Foreign Affairs Committee to 
     urge broadening the use of PEPFAR funds in order to support 
     these ``essential prevention services. . . . As implementers, 
     we cannot overstate the importance of [integration] to the 
     work we do on the ground to prevent the spread of HIV.''
       For individual women who live where HIV is rampant, the 
     interrelatedness of HIV prevention and unintended pregnancy 
     prevention is a practical reality. Yet most international 
     program donors, including the United States government, have 
     viewed them as complementary goals but separate and unrelated 
     outcomes. All along, the fact of contraception as HIV 
     prevention has been hiding in plain sight. It is time to seek 
     it.

  Ms. RICHARDSON. Mr. Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  I rise to oppose any effort, including the Paul Amendment (No. 523), 
which would terminate International Security Assistance Funding. I 
oppose any such attempt because cutting international security funding 
is unwise and short-sighted, and would undercut U.S. interests in the 
Middle East.
  Given the turmoil in the Middle East, it is essential that the United 
States keep its commitment to Israel's security by fully funding the $3 
billion in U.S. aid pledged to Israel for Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012.
  The dramatic events in Egypt and Tunisia underscore the importance of 
Israel to the United States and the fragility of Israel's security 
situation. At a time when Israel is facing increased security threats, 
cutting U.S. aid to Israel would send exactly the wrong message to 
Israel and its potential adversaries about the strength and reliability 
of America's commitment to Israel's security.
  Mr. Chair, international security assistance funding is not a 
``handout'' or ``giveaway'' to Israel, Egypt, Jordan, or to Pakistan. 
Rather, this investment provides several tangible benefits to the 
United States: by helping Israel maintain its qualitative military 
edge, QME, American assistance has promoted peace with Egypt and 
Jordan, and made Israel secure enough to make significant concessions 
in peace agreements with these countries and dramatic peace overtures 
to the Palestinians and to Syria; Israel's battlefield use of American 
equipment and shared know-how has helped the United States improve both 
its equipment and tactics especially while fighting two wars in Iraq 
and Afghanistan; aid to Israel also fuels economic growth here at home 
since Israel is required to spend 74 percent of U.S. aid in the United 
States, which helps create American jobs.
  Mr. Chair, while other countries in the Middle East wrestle with 
change and instability, the United States can count on Israel as our 
trusted, reliable, and democratic ally. Israel in turn must be able to 
count on the United States. Nothing will send a clearer message to 
Israel and any potential adversaries of America's unshakeable 
commitment than defeating any and all attempts to terminate security 
funding for Israel.
  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Chair, I rise today in opposition to this 
legislation. All of us recognize the need for fiscal restraint, but we 
should not be doing so at the expense of working families.
  Governing is about making difficult choices, making wise investments 
where we can, while recognizing the fiscal pressures our nation faces. 
This legislation is an abdication of that responsibility. It would harm 
our most vulnerable citizens, fail to invest in economic recovery and 
cost American jobs. For our economy to recover over the long term, 
American workers need training and education that will enable them to 
compete in a new global economy. However, the Republican spending bill 
makes drastic cuts to education, putting a college degree out of reach 
for more working families.
  In my district, this bill will deprive 22,000 working families of 
nearly $1,000 in financial assistance from the Pell Grant program. Many 
of these New Yorkers will have to pay more in tuition. For some, this 
shortfall may prevent them from completing their degree, altogether.
  The cuts to the Pell program are just one way education suffers. 
Spread throughout my district, there are thirty-two Head Start centers 
that offer early education to the children of working families. New 
York City Head Start will lose almost $30 million in funding. As we 
look for ways to strengthen our country's economy, cutting services 
that prepare children for the future seems not just unconscionable, but 
unwise.
  Just as children and young people would be penalized by this 
legislation, some of our oldest and most vulnerable citizens would be 
harmed. In the middle of winter, New York City would lose $4.4 million 
in funding from the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, forcing 
seniors and working families to choose between keeping the heat on and 
purchasing groceries.
  Meanwhile, important services that help seniors stay in their home 
would be slashed. Job training for workers dislocated by the recession 
would face cuts. New York City would see a loss of $14 million in 
Community Block Service Grants, which fund these valuable initiatives.
  In New York, where working families already struggle to make rent, 
this bill slashes housing services. HUD's public housing capital fund 
would be reduced by 40%. The New York City Housing Authority relies on 
this fund for almost three-fourths of its resources. That money ensures 
elevators work, broken windows get repaired and hallways stay lit. New 
York City would also lose $129 million in Community Development Funds. 
As a result of these cuts, the City's Department of Housing, 
Preservation and Development, which helps ensure housing is safe and 
livable, would have to let 1,200 hardworking employees go.
  Mr. Chair, the American economy is just now turning the corner, 
showing early signs of resurgence. As recovery takes hold, this is not 
the time to cause another wave of job losses, with shortsighted cuts. 
Instead, we should choose wisely, creating jobs now, while investing 
for the long term.
  If we crafted the right spending bill it could accomplish these 
goals, funding our government in a way that meets our responsibilities, 
contributes to growth, and reduces the deficit.
  This is not that bill. I urge my colleagues to oppose it.

[[Page 1867]]

  Mrs. CAPPS. Mr. Chair, I move to strike the last word in strong 
opposition to the Price Amendment and the underlying bill.
  This amendment would make this atrocious CR even worse. Section 1517 
of the CR already cuts the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection by 
40 percent. And as if that wasn't enough to cripple this new bureau, 
the Price Amendment would prohibit funding for salaries and expenses--
ending the agency as it's just getting started.
  Although, I guess we shouldn't be surprised. Mr. Price and his 
colleagues have fought long and hard for their friends on Wall Street 
to allow them to continue gouging families and small businesses with 
predatory mortgages and credit cards.
  But last year the Democratic majority overcame their corporate 
lobbyists and special interests to finally bring an end to these Wall 
Street abuses. We enacted historic credit card reforms and established 
the new independent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau tasked 
specifically with protecting consumers--the first of its kind. This new 
Bureau will finally ensure that mortgage and credit card agreements are 
safe for the families and small businesses most vulnerable to predatory 
practices. The Bureau's Office of Service Member Affairs, led by Holly 
Petraeus, is specifically tasked with protecting our men and women in 
uniform who all too often are preyed upon by unscrupulous lenders.
  No more hidden fees. No more arbitrary interest rate hikes. No more 
twisted contracts that lawyers can't even understand. This is the type 
of protection the American people expect from their government. 
Reasonable, responsible measures to ensure out troops and consumers 
aren't taken advantage of.
  But, for some reason, Mr. Price and those who support this amendment 
believe our troops and the American people don't deserve these 
protections. They're unabashedly trying to destroy the Consumer 
Financial Protection Bureau before it even gets started. They're trying 
to return to the days when Wall Street ran amok and did as it pleased. 
They're trying to return to the same failed policies of the past that 
caused the financial crisis we're still climbing out of.
  One would think that such a ridiculous maneuver would at least be 
disguised as something less destructive. But then again, the Majority 
has made no secret of its pursuit of political gimmicks over 
substantive measures to create jobs.
  Just look at this CR--hundreds and hundreds of pages that do nothing 
but undercut our fragile economic recovery and destroy jobs. Nothing 
but page after page of absurd cuts to proven programs that protect 
consumers, stimulate growth and create jobs.
  Not to mention that we have yet to consider a single bill on the 
House floor that would actually create jobs. Not one.
  Mr. Chair, the American people expect better. They sent us here to 
create jobs, not destroy them.
  I urge my colleagues to oppose the Price Amendment and the underlying 
bill. I yield back.
  Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chair, my amendment, amendment number 504, would 
restore the cuts made to the defense appropriations section of H.R. 1. 
I am pleased that so many of my Republican colleagues in the House 
Armed Services Committee supported this amendment and are willing to 
stand with me against these cuts. HASC Chairman McKeon, Ms. Hartzler, 
Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Wilson of South 
Carolina, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Turner, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Rigell 
and Mr. Schilling should all be recognized for their commitment to our 
men and women in uniform.
  We cannot in good conscience stand by while this body takes an ax to 
the defense budget.
  My amendment restores cuts to the Department of Defense to the level 
authorized by Congress in the National Defense Authorization Act of 
2011. The C.R. contains approximately $516 billion in defense 
appropriations found in Division A, about $14 billion below the defense 
appropriations authorized in the 2011 NDAA. We should honor that budget 
authorization with this amendment.
  We have watched the Obama Administration develop a pattern of raiding 
the defense accounts first, not last, as it should be. We have a 
Constitutional responsibility to provide for the common defense and 
yet, the Administration sees defense as an account that can be gutted 
at the expense of our national security. The government has already 
asked the Pentagon to find $100 billion in efficiencies and to cut $78 
billion over the next five years. The cuts proposed in H.R. 1 are just 
the beginning of a downward spiral.
  Our government has a constitutional mandate to protect the American 
people. America must retain her qualitative edge in the world. Weakness 
will invite aggression and lead to instability throughout the world.
  As I have said before, I wholeheartedly support finding cost savings 
through efficiencies in all areas of the Federal Government. In the 
area of national defense, I believe we must reinvest those savings in 
other defense priorities such as an effective and robust homeland 
missile defense system, equipment that increases protection and combat 
effectiveness for our servicemembers, and modernizing our aging defense 
infrastructure. As vital as it is to cut our national budget so we can 
live within our means, my hope and desire is that we do so in a way 
that does not sacrifice our military capability.
  Again, I thank my colleagues who have vocally supported this 
amendment and I ask other Members in the House to do the same.
  Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the Gohmert amendment 
that would prohibit any United States assistance to a country that 
opposed the position of the United States in the United Nations. If 
passed tomorrow, this amendment would prohibit assistance to over 130 
countries including Cote D'Ivoire, Rwanda, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and 
Jordan. (It prohibits assistance to countries whose recorded votes at 
the UN were the same as the United States less than 50 percent of the 
time.
  This amendment does not take into account the voting realities of the 
UN. It only focuses on recorded votes or non-consensus issues. But the 
fact is, similar to the workings our own Senate, a significant amount 
of votes--or consensus resolutions--are adopted by the UN. According to 
the State Department's Voting Practices in the United Nations, when 
consensus resolutions are factored in as votes identical to those of 
the United States, average overall General Assembly voting coincidence 
of all UN members with the United States in 2009 was 84.3%. So, in 
reality, most member states are agreeing with the position of the 
United States.
  Finally, if the logic of this bill was utilized in our own Congress, 
how could we ever reach bipartisan agreement? Because a Member does not 
support your bill, would that mean you would never work with them on 
anything again? Or, if the Texas delegation to the House voted against 
a transportation appropriation, should they receive no money to build 
roads?
  I urge my colleagues to vote NO on this amendment.

              Voting Practices in the United Nations 2009

 (Report to Congress submitted pursuant to Public Laws 101-246 and 108-
                          447, Mar. 31, 2010.)

                            I: Introduction

       This publication is the 27th annual Report to the Congress 
     on Voting Practices at the United Nations. It is submitted in 
     accordance with Section 406 of Public Law 101-246. This law 
     provides, in relevant part:
       ``The Secretary of State shall transmit to the Speaker of 
     the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a full and 
     complete annual report which assesses for the preceding 
     calendar year, with respect to each foreign country member of 
     the United Nations, the voting practices of the governments 
     of such countries at the United Nations, and which evaluates 
     General Assembly and Security Council actions and the 
     responsiveness of those governments to United States policy 
     on issues of special importance to the United States.''
       This report reviews voting practices in the UN Security 
     Council and General Assembly (UNGA) in calendar year 2009 and 
     presents data in a variety of formats. All Security Council 
     resolutions for the entire year are described, and voting on 
     them is tabulated (Section II). The report also statistically 
     measures the overall voting of UN member states at the 64th 
     General Assembly in the autumn of 2009 in comparison with the 
     U.S. voting record (Section III). It also lists and describes 
     UNGA resolutions selected as particularly important to U.S. 
     interests, again with tables for regional and political 
     groupings (Section IV). It then presents all data by country 
     (Section V). Finally, an annex is included to present the 
     voting patterns on General Assembly resolutions relating to 
     Israel and opposed by the United States.
       The Security Council and the General Assembly deal with a 
     full spectrum of issues--including threats to peace and 
     security, disarmament, economic and social development, 
     humanitarian relief, and human rights--that are considered 
     critical to U.S. interests. A country's behavior at the 
     United Nations is always relevant to its bilateral 
     relationship. Nevertheless, a country's voting record in the 
     United Nations is only one dimension of its relations with 
     the United States. Bilateral economic, strategic, and 
     political issues are at times more directly important to U.S. 
     interests.


               VoTING COINCIDENCE WITH THE UNITED STATES

       On non-consensus issues, i.e., those on which a vote was 
     taken, the average overall

[[Page 1868]]

     General Assembly voting coincidence of all UN members with 
     the United States in 2009 was 39 percent, up significantly 
     from 2008, when it was 25.6 percent, and more than twice the 
     figure from 2007 (18.3 percent).
       When consensus resolutions are factored in as votes 
     identical to those of the United States, a much higher 
     measure of agreement with U.S. positions is reached--84.3 
     percent in 2009. (See Section III--General Assembly--Overall 
     Votes for additional comparisons.)


                         FORMAT AND METHODOLOGY

       The format and presentation of this report are consistent 
     with provisions of Public Law 101-246 as amended by Public 
     Law 108-447, and the methodology employed is the same as that 
     used since the report's inception.
       The tables in this report provide a measurement of the 
     voting coincidence of UN member countries with the United 
     States. However, readers are cautioned about interpreting 
     voting coincidence percentages. In Section III (General 
     Assembly Overall Votes), Section IV (General Assembly 
     Important Votes and Consensus Actions), and the Annex, the 
     percentages in the last column of the tables, under ``votes 
     only,'' are calculated using only votes on which both the 
     United States and the other country in question voted Yes or 
     No; not included are those instances when either state 
     abstained or was absent. Abstentions and absences are often 
     difficult to interpret, but they make a mathematical 
     difference, sometimes significant, in the percentage results. 
     The inclusion of the number of abstentions and absences in 
     the tables of this report enables the reader to consider them 
     in calculating voting coincidence percentages.
       The percentages in the second-to-last column of the tables, 
     under ``including consensus,'' offer another perspective on 
     General Assembly activity. These figures, by presenting the 
     percentage of voting coincidence with the United States after 
     including consensus resolutions as additional identical 
     votes, more accurately reflect the extent of cooperation and 
     agreement in the General Assembly. Since not all states are 
     equally active at the United Nations, the report credits to 
     each country a portion of the 184 consensus resolutions based 
     on its participation in the 84 recorded Plenary votes. Each 
     country's participation rate was calculated by dividing the 
     number of Yes/No/Abstain votes it cast in the Plenary (i.e., 
     the number of times it was not absent) by the total number of 
     Plenary votes). However, this calculation assumes, for want 
     of an attendance record, that all countries were present or 
     absent for consensus resolutions in the same ratio as for 
     recorded votes.
       Questions about this report may be directed to the Bureau 
     of International Organization Affairs in the Department of 
     State.

  Mr. CUMMINGS. Mr. Chair, I oppose the continuing resolution put 
before us by the Republican leadership, which proposes to cut $100 
billion in spending below the funding levels President Obama requested 
in his budget for fiscal year 2011.
  According to a summary developed by the House Appropriations 
Committee, these cuts are ``a massive down payment on the new 
Republican majority's commitment to drastically decrease discretionary 
funding in order to help our economy thrive and spur job creation.''
  Sadly, there does not appear to be any accompanying material that 
specifies exactly how cutting funds from programs that make essential 
investments in our communities and in our Nation's infrastructure will 
spur economic growth. Specifically, I would like to know how many jobs 
will be created by cutting $581 million from state and local law 
enforcement assistance or by cutting billions in funding for the high 
speed rail program.
  I would also like to know how cutting hundreds of millions of dollars 
from each of the HUD community development fund, the clean water and 
drinking water state revolving funds, or from transit capital 
investment grants will support job creation.
  Frankly, I don't believe these cuts will create any jobs--nor do I 
believe they will support the economic growth that will move our 
country out of the recession created by an appalling combination of 
regulatory failure and corporate recklessness.
  Mr. Chair, while I agree that the current deficit is not sustainable, 
we are also not going to create jobs by cutting aid programs for the 
poor.
  According to an October 2010 report released by the Congressional 
Research Service, 3.7 million more persons fell below the poverty line 
in 2009 compared to the number below the poverty line in 2008. These 
3.7 million people were pushed into poverty by a recession they did not 
create.
  As a result, in 2009, a total of 43.6 million persons had incomes 
below the poverty line--more than at any time since we began tracking 
this measure in 1959.
  Within that figure, 1 in every 5 children in this country lived in 
poverty in this Nation in 2009.
  These figures can only be described as appalling.
  And yet we are told that cutting billions from job training programs, 
cutting a billion dollars from community health centers, cutting a 
billion from Head Start, and cutting $747 million from nutritional 
programs for mothers and infants will help eliminate our $14 trillion 
dollar national debt and will also ``help our economy thrive and spur 
job creation.''
  Mr. Chair, these cuts will not contribute to a thriving economy or 
create a single job--but they will take essential aid from the millions 
in our Nation who have the least.
  If we are serious about cutting our debt, we must understand what has 
created that debt.
  Poor people did not create this debt.
  However, an analysis developed by the Center on Budget and Policy 
Priorities in mid-2010 found that ``just two policies dating from the 
Bush Administration--tax cuts and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan--
accounted for over $500 billion of the deficit in 2009 and will account 
for almost $7 trillion in deficits in 2009 through 2019, including the 
associated debt-service costs.''
  Despite the central role that tax cuts for the wealthy have had in 
increasing national debt, Congress voted just a few months ago to 
extend the Bush-era tax cuts, adding billions more to the national 
debt, including more than $80 billion for the tax cuts provided to the 
highest 2 percent of earners.
  Given this choice, it should not come as a surprise that our national 
debt is continuing to grow.
  Since we appear to be unable to consider serious proposals that will 
cut the deficit while truly supporting economic recovery, I urge my 
colleagues to vote against this amendment and to vote no on the 
continuing resolution.
  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to H.R. 1--legislation 
introduced by the House Republican majority that would cut over $60 
billion in essential funding to America's communities without making a 
significant impact on this year's federal deficit.
  The number one priority for Congress is to keep America's economic 
recovery moving forward by creating jobs today and building a 
foundation for sustained, long-term growth. This will require strategic 
investments by the federal government in education, infrastructure, 
research and other areas that promote innovation and enable America to 
compete in the global economy. Tackling rising federal deficits are 
also part of the broader economic challenge. Federal deficits must be 
reduced with ``smart cuts'' to outdated or unnecessary federal programs 
including taxpayer-sponsorship of NASCAR, duplicative weapons programs 
at the Pentagon, and broadcasting to Cuba that never reaches its 
intended audience. I offered amendments to H.R. 1 to make some of these 
``smart cuts.'' Unfortunately, my Republican colleagues voted to 
protect taxpayer subsidies for NASCAR and instead slashed funding to 
homeless veterans, heating assistance for the poor, neighborhood 
schools, road and bridge repair, and hundreds of other critical 
community investments.
  Because H.R. 1 undermines vital services and key long-term 
investments, professional economists believe the bill will put 
America's fragile economic recovery at risk. The Economic Policy 
Institute estimates that enactment of H.R. 1 would result in the 
destruction of 800,000 jobs nationwide. This week, Goldman Sachs 
economic forecaster Alec Phillips concluded that the Republicans' 
budget plan could slow economic growth by up to 2 percent.
  If my Republican colleagues were serious about deficit reduction they 
would support amendments like mine to reduce wasteful programs wherever 
they occur in the federal government--including the Pentagon. They 
would end their political fixation on ``earmarks'' in annual spending 
bills that totaled $16 billion last year and instead focus on special 
interest earmarks in the tax code that cost the government more than $1 
trillion in revenue every year. And if Republicans in Congress really 
wanted to reduce federal deficits they would not have voted in December 
2010 for a bloated $858 billion tax cut package that included $140 
billion in tax cuts for the richest 2 percent of Americans--every cent 
of this package was borrowed and added to federal deficits. I believe 
it is wrong to ask middle class families to sacrifice the quality of 
their schools, roads and health clinics so the richest Americans 
receive a tax cut they do not need.
  America's economy recovery and serious federal budget challenges 
require difficult choices in federal spending and taxation. But 
difficult choices can be made without threatening economic recovery or 
undermining the future competitiveness of our nation.
  I urge my colleagues to join me in rejecting H.R. 1 and instead, get 
to work on a budget that will create jobs and lead to renewed economic 
growth. I was unavailable to vote the following amendments to H.R. 1 
because of a longstanding obligation with the Pentagon's National 
Defense University in the Middle East.

[[Page 1869]]

  Representative McCollum (MN) Amendment No. 50: Prohibits funds from 
being used for the Department of Defense to sponsor NASCAR race cars. 
Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``yes'' on Amendment No. 50.
  Representative Nadler (NY)/Representative Lee (CA)/Representative 
Stark (CA) Amendment No. 232: Would limit funds for military operations 
in Afghanistan to $10 billion. Had Representative McCollum been present 
to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 232.
  Representative Kline (MN) Amendment No. 214: Prohibits funds from 
being used to implement regulations on ``Program Integrity: Gainful 
Employment--New Programs'' published by the Department of Education. 
Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 214.
  Representative Pence (IN) Amendment No. 11: Prohibits any federal 
funds from being used by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. 
Planned Parenthood is already prevented by federal law from using 
federal dollars for abortion services. This amendment takes away the 
money they use to provide for family planning, birth control, medical 
and preventive services. Had Representative McCollum been present to 
vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 11.
  Representative Young (AK) Amendment No. 533: Would block the 
Environmental Appeals Board from reviewing air pollution permits 
related to drilling in the Arctic Ocean. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 533.
  Representative Nadler (NY)/Representative Conyers (MI)/Representative 
Paul (TX)/Representative Jones (NC) Amendment No. 524: Prohibits funds 
to make a FISA application for an order requiring the production of 
library circulation records, library patron lists, book sales records, 
or book customer lists. Had Representative McCollum been present to 
vote she would have voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 524.
  Representative Poe (TX) Amendment No. 466: Prohibits funds from being 
used by EPA to implement and enforce any requirements or issue permits 
for stationary source emissions of six pollutants that cause smog and 
global warming. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she 
would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 466.
  Representative Rehberg (MT) Amendment No. 575: Prohibits any funds 
from being paid to any employee, officer, contractor, or grantee of any 
department or agency funded by the Labor, Health and Human Services, 
Education, and related agencies to implement the Affordable Care Act. 
Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 575.
  Representative King (IA) Amendment No. 267: Prohibits any funds from 
being used to implement any provision of the Affordable Care Act. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 267.
  Representative King (IA) Amendment No. 268: Prohibits any funds from 
being used to pay the salary of employees of any Federal department or 
agency with respect to implementing any provision of the Affordable 
Care Act. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 268.
  Representative Emerson (MO) Amendment No. 83: Prohibits funds from 
being used for enforcement of the individual mandate. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 83.
  Representative Kind (WI) Amendment No. 89: Prohibits a $147 million 
payment to the Brazil Cotton Institute for Brazilian farmers, part of 
an Administration-brokered settlement to avoid retaliation by Brazil 
pursuant to a WTO ruling in Brazil's favor. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 89.
  Representative Kind (WI) Amendment No. 88: Prohibits funds to be used 
to research, develop, test, evaluate, or procure the Expeditionary 
Fighting Vehicle or the Surface-Launched Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-
Air Missile program. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote 
she would have voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 88.
  Representative Blackburn (TN)/Representative Jordan (OH) Amendment 
No. 104: Would cut an additional $22 billion on top of the $100 billion 
in cuts in the CR, reducing Legislative Branch appropriations by an 
additional 11%, and by reducing all other appropriations by 5.5%, 
exempting Defense, Homeland Security, and Military Construction-
Veterans, and funding for Israel. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 104.
  Representative Bishop (NY) Amendment No. 414: Prohibits the use of 
funds for the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, 
Kansas. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have 
voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 414.
  Representative Campbell (CA) Amendment No. 519: Reduces funds by 3.5% 
for the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``yes'' on Amendment No. 519.
  Representative Broun (GA) Amendment No. 246: Prohibits funds from 
being used for beach replenishment projects by the Army Corps of 
Engineers. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 246.
  Representative Broun (GA) Amendment No. 263: Prohibits the use of 
funds to pay any dues to the United Nations. Had Representative 
McCollum been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment 
No. 263.
  Representative Wu (OR) Amendment No. 526: Prohibits the use of funds 
by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) from spending any 
money on oversight of all import and export liquefied natural gas (LNG) 
facilities. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 526.
  Representative Markey (MA) Amendment No. 27: Requires oil companies 
that hold royalty-free leases allowing them to drill for free on the 
public's offshore lands to renegotiate those leases so that the public 
is paid the standard royalty charged for drilling. Had Representative 
McCollum been present to vote she would have voted ``yes'' on Amendment 
No. 27.
  Representative Price (GA) Amendment No. 409: Prohibits funds from 
implementing or enforcing the Affordable Care Act. Had Representative 
McCollum been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment 
No. 409.
  Representative McClintock (CA) Amendment No. 296: Would prevent the 
Department of the Interior from completing a science-based process on 
the Klamath River and deprive the public of information about whether 
dam removal is in the public interest. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 296.
  Representative McDermott (WA) Amendment No. 99: Prohibits the use of 
funds to be used to plan for, begin, continue, finish, process, or 
approve the relocation of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration's Marine Operations Center-Pacific from Seattle, 
Washington, to Newport, Oregon. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on amendment No. 99.
  Representative Herger (CA) Amendment No. 177: Stops all funding to 
complete the USDA Forest Service from finishing a 6-year locally 
oriented planning process for designation of roads, trails and off-road 
use of National Forests. Had Representative McCollum been present to 
vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 177.
  Representative Blumenauer (OR) Amendment No. 323: Prohibits funds 
from being used to make farm commodity payments to people or entities 
in excess of $250,000. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote 
she would have voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 323.
  Representative Boren (OK) Amendment No. 566: Prohibits reporting of 
multiple sales of rifles and shotguns. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 566.
  Representative Forbes (VA) Amendment No. 146: Prohibits the use of 
funds for the Office of the Secretary of Defense to be used for 
official representation purposes. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 146.
  Representative Kaptur (OH) Amendment No. 333: Reduces the amount made 
available in the Payment in Lieu of Taxes program by 75%. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 104.
  Representative Polis (CO) Amendment No. 46: Limits the end strength 
level of U.S. Armed Forces in Europe to 35,000; limits the end strength 
level for active duty Army to 565,275; limits the end strength level 
for active duty Navy to 328,250; limits the end strength level for 
active duty Air Force to 329,275; and reduces the corresponding 
military personnel accounts by $292,451,213. Had Representative 
McCollum been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment 
No. 46.

[[Page 1870]]

  Representative Johnson (OH) Amendment No. 498: Prohibits Interior 
Department's Office of Surface Mining from implementing regulations 
that protect streams from mining waste and other pollution. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 104.
  Representative Goodlatte (VA) Amendment No. 467: Prohibits the use of 
funds to develop, evaluate, or provide oversight to, or backstop total 
maximum daily loads or watershed implementation plans for the 
Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Had Representative McCollum been present to 
vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 467.
  Representative Gardner (CO) Amendment No. 79: Prohibits the use of 
funds for health insurance exchanges. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 79.
  Representative Neugebauer (TX) Amendment No. 151: Prohibits the use 
of funds for repair, alteration, or improvement of the Executive 
Residence at the White House. Had Representative McCollum been present 
to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 151.
  Representative Rooney (FL) Amendment No. 13: Prohibits the use of 
funds by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement or 
enforce water quality standards to protect the State of Florida's lakes 
and waters. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 13.
  Representative Stearns (FL) Amendment No. 8: Prohibits the use of 
funds for the design, renovation, construction, or rental of any 
headquarters for the United Nations. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 8.
  Representative Flake (AZ) Amendment No. 377: Prohibits the use of 
funds for the construction of ethanol blender pumps or ethanol storage 
facilities. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have ``yes'' voted on Amendment No. 377.
  Representative Guinta (NH) Amendment No. 166: Prohibits the use of 
funds for a government contract that requires a project labor 
agreement. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have voted ``no'' Amendment No. 166.
  Representative Hall (TX) Amendment No. 495: Would block scientific 
research efforts at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA) to understand the domestic and international impacts of climate 
change. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have 
voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 495.
  Representative Lee (CA)/Representative Stark (CA) Amendment No. 141: 
Would reduce DoD funding to 2008 levels excluding funding for military 
personnel and the defense health program. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 141.
  Representative Griffith (VA) Amendment No. 109: Would seek to stop 
federal agencies from regulating mountain top removal mining. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 109.
  Representative Jones (NC) Amendment No. 548: Would prohibit the 
development of approval of fisheries catch shares programs under the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, which are an 
important tool for rebuilding fish stocks, and aiding recovery and 
sustainability of ocean fisheries. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 548.
  Representative Luetkemeyer (MO) Amendment No. 47: Would bar funding 
for the study of the Missouri River Projects authorized by the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2009. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 47.
  Representative Luetkemeyer (MO) Amendment No. 149: Would block U.S. 
contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 
limiting domestic and international scientific research efforts to 
understand the impacts of climate change. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 149.
  Representative Issa (CA) Amendment No. 569: Prohibits federal 
agencies from awarding pay raises to employees who move to a higher pay 
grade and assume greater responsibilities. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have ``no'' on Amendment No. 569.
  Representative Sullivan (OK) Amendment No. 94: No funds for 
implementation of decision by EPA administrator to increase ethanol 
content in gas to 15 percent. Had Representative McCollum been present 
to vote she would have voted ``no'' Amendment No. 94.
  Representative McKinley (WV) Amendment No. 216: Would bar EPA from 
exercising or implementing Sec. 404(c) of the Clean Water Act EPA under 
which the agency regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material 
into U.S. wetlands and waters. Had Representative McCollum been present 
to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 216.
  Representative McKinley (WV) Amendment No. 217: Eliminates funding 
for regulating coal ash as a hazardous waste. Had Representative 
McCollum been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment 
No. 217.
  Representative Pompeo (KS) Amendment No. 545: Prohibits the use of 
federal funds for the public, searchable consumer product safety 
database the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act directs the CPSC 
to create. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would 
have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 545.
  Representative Burgess (TX) Amendment No. 200: Prohibits funds from 
being used to pay the salary of any employee of the Center for Consumer 
Information and Insurance Oversight in the Department of Health and 
Human Services. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she 
would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 200.
  Representative Heller (NV) Amendment No. 482: Prohibits the use of 
funds for monument designations. Had Representative McCollum been 
present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 482.
  Representative Noem (SD) Amendment No. 563: Prohibits the use of 
funds by EPA to issue air quality standards for soot (coarse 
particulate matter). Had Representative McCollum been present to vote 
she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 104.
  Representative Pitts (PA) Amendment No. 430: Prohibits the use of 
funds to be used to pay the salary of any officer or employee of the 
Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, or 
the Department of the Treasury who takes any action to specify or 
define, through regulations, guidelines, or otherwise, essential 
benefits under section 1302 of the Affordable Care Act. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 430.
  Representative Carney (DE) Amendment No. 241: Prohibits funds for the 
oil and gas research and development program at the department of 
energy. Had Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have 
voted ``yes'' on Amendment No. 241.
  Representative Mulvaney (SC) Amendment No. 164: Cuts all funds in the 
bill back to 2006 levels, except for the Department of Defense, 
Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 164.
  Representative King (IA) Amendment No. 273: Prohibits the use of 
funds to administer the wage-rate requirements (Davis-Bacon) of 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, with 
respect to any project or program funded by this Act. Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on Amendment No. 273.
  Representative Burgess (TX) Amendment No. 154: Prohibits the 
Department of Education from using FY 2011 funds to execute a provision 
in the Education Jobs Fund which required the Governor of Texas to 
provide certain assurances of State effort to maintain elementary and 
secondary education funding. Had Representative McCollum been present 
to vote she would have voted ``no'' on Amendment No. 154.
  Democratic Motion to Recommit H.R. 1. Had Representative McCollum 
been present to vote she would have ``yes'' on the Democratic Motion to 
Recommit.
  Final Passage of H.R. 1--Fiscal Year Continuing Appropriations Act 
for FY 2011 (Representative Rogers (KY)--Appropriations). Had 
Representative McCollum been present to vote she would have voted 
``no'' on H.R. 1.
  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chair, pursuant to section 8119 of 
Division A of H.R. 1 as passed the House on February 18, 2011 I submit 
the following explanatory statement:


                         reprogramming guidance

       For fiscal year 2011, the Department of Defense is directed 
     to adhere to the definition of Program, Project and Activity, 
     and to follow the guidance for Congressional Special Interest 
     Items, Reprogrammings, Reprogramming Reporting Requirements, 
     and Funding Increases, as specified in the Explanatory 
     Statement, Division A, Department of Defense Appropriations 
     Act Fiscal Year 2010, Public Law 111-118.


                            classified annex

       A classified annex accompanying this Act will be forwarded 
     under separate cover.

[[Page 1871]]



                             (Rescissions)

       Language is included that rescinds $1,113,536,000 from the 
     following programs:
2009 Appropriations:
                             Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
    Future Combat Systems...................................$86,300,000
                                               Other Procurement, Army:
    Armored Security Vehicles................................55,000,000
    Force XXII Battle Command Brigade and Below..............30,600,000
    Semi-trailers, Flatbed...................................62,000,000
                                            Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
    KC-130J..................................................12,000,000
    F/A-18E/F................................................14,100,000
                                       Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
    Global Hawk excess funds.................................49,000,000
    C-130 AMP................................................31,900,000
    HC/MC updated pricing....................................36,000,000
2010 Appropriations:
                                            Aircraft Procurement, Army:
    Tactical SIGINT Payload..................................14,000,000
                             Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
    Future Combat Systems spin-outs..........................19,600,000
    Improved Recovery Vehicle.................................8,700,000
    MK-19 Grenade Machine Gun Modifications...................7,700,000
                                             Missile Procurement, Army:
    GMLRS.....................................................9,171,000
                                            Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
    EA-18G MYP savings.......................................89,120,000
    F/A-18E/F MYP savings....................................72,727,000
    F-18 Series ECO..........................................17,000,000
    E-6 Series................................................6,000,000
                      Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps:
    General Purpose Bombs....................................11,576,000
                                     Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy:
    DDG-51 main reduction gear savings.......................22,000,000
                                               Other Procurement, Navy:
    Minesweeping System Replacement...........................5,400,000
    Aircraft Launch Recovery..................................3,642,000
                                       Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
    B-2A......................................................5,900,000
    B-52.....................................................39,300,000
    C-17 Modifications.......................................12,200,000
    C-130J updated pricing....................................7,000,000
    C-130 AP updated pricing.................................15,100,000
    HC/MC-130 AP.............................................46,900,000
    HC/MC-130 updated pricing................................13,200,000
    Initial Spares--Joint Stars Re-engining..................11,700,000
                                          Other Procurement, Air Force:
    FAB-T....................................................36,600,000
                      Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army:
    Aircraft Avionics--JTRS AMF..............................10,200,000
    HFDS.....................................................15,000,000
    Future Combat System--Class IV UAV Program of Record.....12,000,000
    TUAV--TSP................................................16,300,000
                 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force:
    B-2......................................................90,000,000
    Classified Program.......................................10,000,000
    Alternative Fuels........................................10,000,000
    Small Diameter Bomb......................................22,000,000
    Engine CIP...............................................15,000,000
    JSTARS...................................................14,600,000
    RQ-4 UAV.................................................18,000,000
    C-5 Airlift Squadrons....................................19,000,000
              Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide:
    BMD Hercules.............................................10,000,000

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          M-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                            MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                6,392,861                6,392,861
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                2,088,308                2,088,308
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                1,854,718                1,854,718
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  255,925                  255,925
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                   97,698                   97,698
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  300,939                  300,939
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  198,601                  198,601
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                   61,798                   61,798
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  487,469                  487,469
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................               11,738,317               11,738,317
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................               13,682,488               13,682,488
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                4,470,859                4,470,859
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                4,395,850                4,395,850
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                  102,851                  102,851
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                1,269,047                1,129,047
                         Enlistment Bonuses--Excess to          .......................                  -40,000
                          Requirement.
                         Re-enlistment Bonuses--Excess to       .......................                 -100,000
                          Requirement.
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  806,471                  806,471
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                  255,127                  255,127
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                1,046,710                1,046,710
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................               26,029,403               25,889,403
 
                         BA-3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS...  .......................  .......................
                         ACADEMY CADETS.......................                   74,773                   74,773
                         TOTAL, BA-3..........................                   74,773                   74,773
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                1,313,309                1,313,309
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                  817,691                  817,691
                         FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL                            748                      748
                          ALLOWANCE.
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                2,131,748                2,131,748
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                  202,699                  202,699
                         TRAINING TRAVEL......................                  142,749                  142,749
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                  494,937                  494,937
                         ROTATIONAL TRAVEL....................                  674,831                  674,831
                         SEPARATION TRAVEL....................                  198,439                  198,439
                         TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............                   12,137                   12,137
                         NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................                   12,639                   12,639
                         TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............                   38,931                   38,931
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                1,777,362                1,777,362
 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS...                    2,233                    2,233
                         INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES                             648                      648
                          SAVINGS.
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                   45,500                   45,500
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                  188,778                  188,778
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                   30,879                   30,879
                         ADOPTION EXPENSES....................                      610                      610
                         TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY...............                    8,007                    8,007
                         PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........                      338                      338
                         RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS                        138,731                  138,731
                          (ROTC).
                         JUNIOR ROTC..........................                   50,201                   50,201
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                  465,925                  465,925
 
                         LESS REIMBURSABLES...................                 -245,251                 -245,251
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............                        0                 -789,624

[[Page 1872]]

 
                         Undistributed Transfer to Title IX...  .......................                 -789,624
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY......               41,972,277               41,042,653
 
                                            MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                3,680,703                3,680,703
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                1,202,462                1,202,462
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                1,263,675                1,263,675
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  143,344                  143,344
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                  155,148                  155,148
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  355,821                  355,821
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  104,291                  104,291
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                   25,353                   25,353
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  278,666                  278,666
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                7,209,463                7,209,463
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                8,257,803                8,257,803
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                2,700,204                2,700,204
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                3,682,915                3,682,915
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                  100,499                  100,499
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  839,787                  814,787
                         Re-enlistment Bonuses--Excess to       .......................                   -5,000
                          Requirement.
                         Enlistment Bonuses--Excess to          .......................                  -20,000
                          Requirement.
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  498,621                  498,621
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                  127,343                  127,343
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  631,722                  631,722
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................               16,838,894               16,813,894
 
                         BA-3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF            .......................  .......................
                          MIDSHIPMEN.
                         MIDSHIPMEN...........................                   74,950                   74,950
                         TOTAL, BA-3..........................                   74,950                   74,950
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  685,085                  685,085
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                  419,333                  419,333
                         FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL                             12                       12
                          ALLOWANCE.
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                1,104,430                1,104,430
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                   76,220                   76,220
                         TRAINING TRAVEL......................                   71,814                   71,814
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                  219,685                  219,685
                         ROTATIONAL TRAVEL....................                  354,275                  354,275
                         SEPARATION TRAVEL....................                  103,806                  103,806
                         TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............                   39,368                   39,368
                         NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................                    5,760                    5,760
                         TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............                    6,386                    6,386
                         OTHER................................                    6,406                    6,406
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                  883,720                  883,720
 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS...                      261                      261
                         INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES                           1,427                    1,427
                          SAVINGS.
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                   17,700                   17,700
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                   88,350                   88,350
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                   21,515                   21,515
                         ADOPTION EXPENSES....................                      271                      271
                         TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY...............                    8,030                    8,030
                         PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........                      190                      190
                         RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS                         27,345                   27,345
                          (ROTC).
                         JUNIOR R.O.T.C.......................                   14,093                   14,093
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                  179,182                  179,182
 
                         LESS REIMBURSABLES...................                 -339,690                 -339,690
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............                        0                  -13,500
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                  -13,500
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY......               25,950,949               25,912,449
 
                                        MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                1,433,200                1,433,200
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                  465,072                  465,072
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                  462,438                  462,438
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                   59,613                   59,613
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                   50,011                   50,011
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   27,921                   27,921
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                   34,404                   34,404
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                   13,299                   13,299
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  109,014                  109,014
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                2,654,972                2,654,972
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                4,910,560                4,910,560
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                1,591,322                1,591,322
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                1,660,161                1,660,161
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                    9,158                    9,158
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  288,654                  288,654
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  278,060                  278,060
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                   65,101                   65,101
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  372,411                  372,411
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................                9,175,427                9,175,427
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  489,789                  489,789
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                  324,565                  324,565
                         FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL                            750                      750
                          ALLOWANCE.
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                  815,104                  815,104
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                   79,378                   79,378
                         TRAINING TRAVEL......................                   10,079                   10,079
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                  239,442                  239,442
                         ROTATIONAL TRAVEL....................                  115,330                  115,330
                         SEPARATION TRAVEL....................                   55,528                   55,528
                         TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............                      742                      742
                         NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................                    6,305                    6,305
                         TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............                   13,818                   13,818
                         OTHER................................                    2,683                    2,683
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                  523,305                  523,305
 

[[Page 1873]]

 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS...                    1,823                    1,823
                         INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES                              19                       19
                          SAVINGS.
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                   17,200                   17,200
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                   69,359                   69,359
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                    4,249                    4,249
                         ADOPTION EXPENSES....................                      159                      159
                         TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY...............                    2,853                    2,853
                         PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........                      278                      278
                         JUNIOR R.O.T.C.......................                    5,573                    5,573
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                  101,513                  101,513
 
                         LESS REIMBURSABLES...................                  -20,160                  -20,160
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............                        0                  -40,000
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                  -40,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE                   13,250,161               13,210,161
                          CORPS.
 
                                          MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                4,687,593                4,687,593
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                1,522,644                1,522,644
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                1,347,403                1,347,403
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  182,253                  182,253
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                  239,121                  239,121
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  322,642                  322,642
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  128,157                  128,157
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                   64,974                   64,974
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  355,711                  355,711
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                8,850,498                8,850,498
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                8,540,083                8,540,083
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                2,781,402                2,781,402
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                3,038,904                3,038,904
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                   36,980                   36,980
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  396,103                  380,103
                         Re-enlistment Bonuses--Excess to       .......................                  -16,000
                          Requirement.
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  570,857                  570,857
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                  124,411                  124,411
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  653,317                  653,317
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................               16,142,057               16,126,057
 
                         BA-3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS...  .......................  .......................
                         ACADEMY CADETS.......................                   75,383                   75,383
                         TOTAL, BA-3..........................                   75,383                   75,383
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  872,055                  872,055
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                  169,924                  169,924
                         FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL                             37                       37
                          ALLOWANCE.
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                1,042,016                1,042,016
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION....  .......................  .......................
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                   87,377                   87,377
                         TRAINING TRAVEL......................                   72,521                   72,521
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                  296,604                  296,604
                         ROTATIONAL TRAVEL....................                  505,198                  505,198
                         SEPARATION TRAVEL....................                  176,549                  176,549
                         TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............                   23,561                   23,561
                         NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................                   40,772                   40,772
                         TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............                   28,936                   28,936
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                1,231,518                1,231,518
 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS...                      131                      131
                         INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES                           2,179                    2,179
                          SAVINGS.
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                   19,900                   19,900
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                   49,143                   49,143
                         SURVIVOR BENEFITS....................                    1,760                    1,760
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                      484                      484
                         ADOPTION EXPENSES....................                      395                      395
                         TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY...............                    6,903                    6,903
                         PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........                    1,578                    1,578
                         RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS                         45,571                   45,571
                          (ROTC).
                         JUNIOR ROTC..........................                   16,185                   16,185
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                  144,229                  144,229
 
                         LESS REIMBURSABLES...................                 -363,946                 -363,946
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE.               27,121,755               27,105,755
 
                                             RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY
 
                         BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND   .......................  .......................
                          SUPPORT.
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                    1,249,133                1,249,133
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR                      44,460                   36,460
                          ACTIVE DUTY).
                         Projected Underexecution.............  .......................                   -8,000
                         PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)......                  268,215                  268,215
                         PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE                           8,830                    8,830
                          RECRUITS).
                         MOBILIZATION TRAINING................                   21,460                   10,460
                         Projected Underexecution.............  .......................                  -11,000
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                  177,121                  177,121
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                  293,439                  283,439
                         Excessive Growth.....................  .......................                  -10,000
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                2,129,646                2,129,646
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                   57,633                   57,633
                         HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP........                   66,940                   66,940
                         OTHER PROGRAMS.......................                   80,288                   80,288
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                4,397,165                4,368,165
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............                        0                  -35,000
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                  -35,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY.......                4,397,165                4,333,165
 
                                             RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY
 
                         BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND   .......................  .......................
                          SUPPORT.
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                      626,657                  626,657
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR                       9,070                    9,070
                          ACTIVE DUTY).
                         PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)......                   45,603                   45,603
                         MOBILIZATION TRAINING................                    8,434                    8,434

[[Page 1874]]

 
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                   45,930                   45,930
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                   89,647                   89,647
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                1,061,128                1,061,128
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                    3,780                    3,780
                         HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP........                   53,942                   53,942
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                1,944,191                1,944,191
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............                        0                   -4,000
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                   -4,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY.......                1,944,191                1,940,191
 
                                         RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
 
                         BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND   .......................  .......................
                          SUPPORT.
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                      196,974                  196,974
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR                      36,116                   36,116
                          ACTIVE DUTY).
                         PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)......                   96,138                   96,138
                         MOBILIZATION TRAINING................                    3,724                    3,724
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                   16,810                   16,810
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                   27,688                   27,688
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                  216,537                  216,537
                         PLATOON LEADER CLASS.................                   12,256                   12,256
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                   11,198                   11,198
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                  617,441                  617,441
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............                        0                   -5,250
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                   -1,250
                         MIP Marine Corps Reserve Intelligence  .......................                   -4,000
                          Program.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE                       617,441                  612,191
                          CORPS.
 
                                          RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
 
                         BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND   .......................  .......................
                          SUPPORT.
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                      670,341                  670,341
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR                     101,951                  101,951
                          ACTIVE DUTY).
                         PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)......                   54,850                   54,850
                         PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE                              50                       50
                          RECRUITS).
                         MOBILIZATION TRAINING................                      447                      447
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                  163,272                  163,272
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                  243,233                  243,233
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                  378,772                  378,772
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                   18,295                   18,295
                         HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP........                   51,331                   51,331
                         OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMINISTRATION and                       4,255                    4,255
                          SUPPORT).
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                1,686,797                1,686,797
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............                        0                  -36,000
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                  -15,000
                         Below Budgeted End Strength..........  .......................                  -21,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE..                1,686,797                1,650,797
 
                                         NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY
 
                         BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND   .......................  .......................
                          SUPPORT.
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                    2,010,867                1,980,867
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -30,000
                         PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)......                  510,859                  510,859
                         PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE                          71,222                   71,222
                          RECRUITS).
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                  577,600                  577,600
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                  534,954                  521,954
                         Recruiter Mandays--Excess to           .......................                  -13,000
                          Requirement.
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                3,788,954                3,788,954
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                  129,840                  129,840
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                7,624,296                7,581,296
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............                        0                  -70,000
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                  -70,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY                7,624,296                7,511,296
 
                                       NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
 
                         BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND   .......................  .......................
                          SUPPORT.
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                      939,636                  931,636
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         Inactive Duty Training--Unjustified    .......................                   -8,000
                          Growth.
                         PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)......                   99,839                   99,839
                         PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE                             298                      298
                          RECRUITS).
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                  209,944                  209,944
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                  131,226                  131,226
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                1,692,112                1,682,112
                         Bonuses--Unjustified Requirement.....  .......................                  -10,000
                         EDUCATION BENEFITS...................                   30,543                   30,543
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                3,103,598                3,085,598
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............                        0                  -25,500
                         Unobligated/Unexpended Balances......  .......................                  -17,500
                         Lower than Budgeted Pay Grade Mix....  .......................                   -8,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR                 3,103,598                3,060,098
                          FORCE.
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL............              127,668,630              126,378,756
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          O-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY
 
111....................  MANEUVER UNITS.......................                1,087,321                1,087,321
112....................  MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.............                  114,448                  113,790
                         Deployment Offset....................                        -                     -658
113....................  ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES..............                  773,540                  769,338
                         Deployment Offset....................                        -                   -4,202
114....................  THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.................                  794,806                  767,727
                         Aircraft Lease for Casualty                                  -                  -18,500
                          Evacuation Funded in fiscal year
                          2011 OCO.
                         Transfer to Title IX--Chemical                               -                   -8,579
                          Defense Equipment Sustainment.
115....................  LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.......                1,399,332                1,392,912
                         Transfer to Title IX--MRAP Vehicle                           -                   -6,420
                          Sustainment at Combat Training
                          Centers.
116....................  AVIATION ASSETS......................                  897,666                  867,666
                         Deployment Offset....................                        -                  -30,000
121....................  FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT...                2,520,995                2,314,041
                         Unjustified Increase for Travel......                        -                  -91,000
                         Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010                         -                  -35,000
                          Costs.

[[Page 1875]]

 
                         Transfer to Title IX--Body Armor                             -                  -71,660
                          Sustainment.
                         Transfer to Title IX--Rapid Equipping                        -                   -9,294
                          Force Readiness.
122....................  LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS........                  596,117                  574,946
                         Transfer to Title IX--Fixed Wing Life  .......................                  -21,171
                          Cycle Contract Support.
123....................  LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE........                  890,122                  950,122
                         UH-60 A to L Conversions.............                        -                  +60,000
131....................  BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT..............                7,563,566                7,281,191
                         Transfer from the Defense Health                             -                  +30,625
                          Program for Centralized Management
                          of the Substance Abuse Program.
                         Army Tenant Pentagon Rent                                    -                  -33,000
                          Requirements.
                         Reduced Requirement for Collateral                           -                  -50,000
                          Equipment in fiscal year 2011.
                         Transfer to Title IX--Overseas                               -                 -200,000
                          Security Guards.
                         Transfer to Title IX--Senior Leader                          -                  -30,000
                          Initiative--Comprehensive Soldier
                          Fitness Program.
132....................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION,                 2,500,892                2,500,892
                          & MODERNIZATION.
133....................  MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL                             390,004                  390,004
                          HEADQUARTERS.
134....................  COMBATANT COMMANDER'S CORE OPERATIONS                  167,758                  167,758
138....................  COMBATANT COMMANDER'S DIRECT MISSION                   464,851                  464,851
                          SUPPORT.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........               20,161,418               19,642,559
 
211....................  STRATEGIC MOBILITY...................                  333,266                  333,266
212....................  ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS............                  102,240                  102,240
213....................  INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS..............                    5,736                    5,736
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2..........                  441,242                  441,242
 
311....................  OFFICER ACQUISITION..................                  129,902                  129,902
312....................  RECRUIT TRAINING.....................                   74,705                   74,705
313....................  ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING............                   63,223                   63,223
314....................  SENIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS                  479,343                  479,343
321....................  SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING...........                1,082,517                1,027,334
                         Unjustified Growth in Supply and       .......................                  -40,000
                          Equipment Purchases.
                         Transfer to Title IX--Survivability    .......................                  -15,183
                          and Maneuverability Training.
322....................  FLIGHT TRAINING......................                1,046,124                1,032,124
                         Budget Justification Does not Match    .......................                  -14,000
                          Summary of Price and Program Changes.
323....................  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION...                  163,607                  163,607
324....................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                  695,200                  695,200
331....................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                  544,014                  524,014
                         Budget Justification Does not Match    .......................                  -20,000
                          Summary of Price and Program Changes.
332....................  EXAMINING............................                  153,091                  153,091
333....................  OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.....                  241,170                  241,170
334....................  CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING......                  220,771                  220,771
335....................  JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS                  175,347                  183,347
                         Program Increase--Junior ROTC........  .......................                   +8,000
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3..........                5,069,014                4,987,831
 
411....................  SECURITY PROGRAMS....................                1,030,355                1,030,355
421....................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                  587,952                  557,826
                         First Destination Transportation Cost  .......................                  -30,126
                          of New Equipment is Financed in the
                          Cost of Equipment.
422....................  CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES............                  669,853                  669,853
423....................  LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES..........                  503,876                  503,876
424....................  AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT................                  435,020                  435,020
431....................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                  912,355                  902,355
                         Unjustified Growth for Headquarters    .......................                  -10,000
                          Accounts.
432....................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                1,528,371                1,528,371
433....................  MANPOWER MANAGEMENT..................                  368,480                  328,480
                         Unsupported Request for 712 Temporary  .......................                  -40,000
                          Hires.
434....................  OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT..............                  261,829                  261,829
435....................  OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT................                1,145,902                1,149,822
                         Capitol 4th..........................  .......................                   +3,920
436....................  ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES...............                  205,967                  205,967
437....................  REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT...............                  168,664                  168,664
441....................  INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS..                  462,488                  476,888
                         Outfitting of NATO SOF Headquarters    .......................                  +14,400
                          Building.
442....................  MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT OF OTHER                          19,179                   16,179
                          NATIONS.
                         Information Operations...............  .......................                   -3,000
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                8,300,291                8,235,485
 
                         FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR          .......................                   -1,000
                          INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
                          PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
                          RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                   33,971,965               33,306,117
                          ARMY.
 
                                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY
 
1A1A...................  MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS..                4,429,832                4,429,832
1A2A...................  FLEET AIR TRAINING...................                   81,345                1,605,720
                         Transfer of Fleet Air Training         .......................                 +958,200
                          funding from SAG 3B2K.
                         Unjustified Administrative Overhead    .......................                   -4,225
                          Cost Growth.
                         Transfer of Chief of Naval Air         .......................                 +570,400
                          Training from SAG 3B2K.
1A3A...................  AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND                             38,932                   38,932
                          ENGINEERING SERVICES.
1A4A...................  AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT....                  100,485                  100,485
1A4N...................  AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT..................                  355,520                  355,520
1A5A...................  AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE...........                1,221,410                1,221,410
1A6A...................  AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT....                   27,448                   27,448
1B1B...................  MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS....                3,696,913                3,666,913
                         Unjustified Growth in Per Diem Days..  .......................                  -30,000
1B2B...................  SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING.                  728,983                  728,983
1B4B...................  SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE...............                4,761,670                4,761,670
1B5B...................  SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT........                1,344,844                1,338,844
                         Transfer to RDTE, DW per Memorandum    .......................                   -1,500
                          of Agreement.
                         NAVSEA Process Requirements and        .......................                   -4,500
                          Improvement Office Budget
                          Realignment and Consolidation
                          Justified as Program Growth.
1C1C...................  COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................                  615,069                  550,069
                         Overstatement of DISA Pricing          .......................                  -65,000
                          Adjustment.
1C2C...................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE...................                   89,340                   89,340
1C3C...................  SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE.......                  177,397                  177,397
1C4C...................  WARFARE TACTICS......................                  416,068                  416,068
1C5C...................  OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND                            316,525                  316,525
                          OCEANOGRAPHY.
1C6C...................  COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................                1,083,618                  870,817
                         Unjustified Growth for Naval           .......................                  -20,000
                          Expeditionary Combat Command.
                         Transfer to Title IX - Naval           .......................                 -192,801
                          Expeditionary Combat Command
                          Increases.
1C7C...................  EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................                  165,985                  165,985
1C8C...................  DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.............                    2,836                    2,836
1CCH...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS.                  208,250                  208,250
1CCM...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION                    274,071                  274,071
                          SUPPORT.
1D1D...................  CRUISE MISSILE.......................                  130,219                  130,219
1D2D...................  FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE..............                1,138,418                1,138,418
1D3D...................  IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT...                   89,184                   89,184
1D4D...................  WEAPONS MAINTENANCE..................                  459,561                  459,561
1D7D...................  OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.........                  366,751                  361,751
                         Civilian Personnel Over-Pricing......  .......................                   -5,000
BSIT...................  ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY....                  820,507                1,031,207
                         Requested Transfer from OP,N line 147  .......................                 +217,700
                          for NGEN Funding.
                         Overstatement of DISA Pricing          .......................                   -7,000
                          Adjustment.
BSM1...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                1,900,386                1,900,386
                          MODERNIZATION.
BSS1...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                4,502,857                4,452,857

[[Page 1876]]

 
                         Transfer to Title IX - Regional/       .......................                  -50,000
                          Emergency Operations Center.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........               29,544,424               30,910,698
 
2A1F...................  SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE........                  424,047                  424,047
2B1G...................  AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS...                    7,593                    7,593
2B2G...................  SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS.......                  177,482                  180,682
                         Program Increase - Ship Disposal       .......................                   +3,200
                          Program.
2C1H...................  FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM...............                   70,990                   70,990
2C2H...................  INDUSTRIAL READINESS.................                    2,707                    2,707
2C3H...................  COAST GUARD SUPPORT..................                   23,845                   23,845
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2..........                  706,664                  709,864
 
3A1J...................  OFFICER ACQUISITION..................                  141,057                  141,057
3A2J...................  RECRUIT TRAINING.....................                   10,853                   10,853
3A3J...................  RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS......                  143,504                  143,504
3B1K...................  SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING...........                  533,004                  530,004
                         Transfer to Title IX - NAVSEA VSSS/    .......................                   -3,000
                          EOD Training.
3B2K...................  FLIGHT TRAINING......................                1,538,171                    9,571
                         Transfer of Fleet Air Training         .......................                 -958,200
                          funding to SAG 1A2A.
                         Transfer of Chief of Naval Air         .......................                 -570,400
                          Training to SAG 1A2A.
3B3K...................  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION...                  162,844                  162,844
3B4K...................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                  171,153                  171,153
3C1L...................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                  261,287                  261,922
                         Program Increase - Naval Sea Cadet     .......................                     +635
                          Corps.
3C3L...................  OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.....                  145,560                  145,560
3C4L...................  CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING......                  109,865                  109,865
3C5L...................  JUNIOR ROTC..........................                   50,369                   53,369
                         Program Increase - Junior ROTC.......  .......................                   +3,000
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3..........                3,267,667                1,739,702
 
4A1M...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                  829,010                  829,010
4A2M...................  EXTERNAL RELATIONS...................                    7,632                    7,632
4A3M...................  CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL                        118,838                  111,838
                          MANAGEMENT.
                         Overstated Requirement for Other       .......................                   -7,000
                          Intragovernmental Purchases.
4A4M...................  MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL                        194,775                  194,775
                          MANAGEMENT.
4A5M...................  OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT..............                  282,580                  282,580
4A6M...................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                  503,067                  496,089
                         Nuclear Command, Control and           .......................                   -6,978
                          Communications Systems Budget
                          Realignment and Consolidation
                          Justified as Program Growth.
4B1N...................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                  230,294                  230,294
4B2N...................  PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN.....                  259,990                  259,990
4B3N...................  ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT...                  868,069                  856,069
                         Civilian Personnel Over-Pricing......  .......................                  -12,000
4B5N...................  HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL                         55,217                   55,217
                          SUPPORT.
4B6N...................  COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS...............                   19,053                   19,053
4B7N...................  SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS.                   77,702                   77,702
4C1P...................  NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE..........                  549,484                  546,484
                         Civilian Personnel Over-Pricing......  .......................                   -3,000
4D1Q...................  INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND                           5,567                    5,567
                          AGENCIES.
999....................  OTHER PROGRAMS.......................                  614,275                  607,475
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                   -6,800
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                4,615,553                4,579,775
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                 -127,200
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                         FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR          .......................                   -3,600
                          INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
                          PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
                          RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                   38,134,308               37,809,239
                          NAVY.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
 
1A1A...................  OPERATIONAL FORCES...................                  745,678                  745,678
1A2A...................  FIELD LOGISTICS......................                  658,616                  658,616
1A3A...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                   78,891                   78,891
1B1B...................  MARITIME PREPOSITIONING..............                   72,344                   72,344
BSM1...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  594,904                  594,904
                          MODERNIZATION.
BSS1...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                2,206,137                2,198,437
                         Collateral Equipment Decrease in       .......................                   -7,700
                          fiscal year 2011 not Properly
                          Accounted for in Budget
                          Documentation.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                4,356,570                4,348,870
 
3A1C...................  RECRUIT TRAINING.....................                   16,096                   16,096
3A2C...................  OFFICER ACQUISITION..................                      420                      420
3B1D...................  SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING..........                   91,197                   91,197
3B3D...................  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION...                   32,379                   32,379
3B4D...................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                  319,742                  319,742
3C1F...................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                  233,663                  233,663
3C2F...................  OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.....                   61,980                   61,980
3C3F...................  JUNIOR ROTC..........................                   19,497                   19,497
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3..........                  774,974                  774,974
 
4A3G...................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                   29,569                   29,569
4A4G...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                  341,657                  335,657
                         Administrative Efficiencies..........  .......................                   -6,000
4B3N...................  ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT...                   87,570                   87,570
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                  458,796                  452,796
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                  -34,400
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                         FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR          .......................                   -2,500
                          INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
                          PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
                          RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    5,590,340                5,539,740
                          MARINE CORPS.
 
                                      OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
 
011A...................  PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES................                4,261,115                4,218,222
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -34,408
                          Execution.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                   -8,485
                          Personnel.
011C...................  COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES............                2,995,278                2,933,353
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -61,925
                          Execution.
011D...................  AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING..............                1,573,602                1,508,352
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -13,598
                          Execution.
                         Transfer of Range Maintenance funding  .......................                  -33,652
                          to SAG 011R.
                         Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010   .......................                  -18,000
                          Cost for F-35A Beddown Costs.
011M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                2,189,481                2,176,793
                         Program Increase--Warner Robins Air    .......................                   +4,000
                          Logistics Center Aircraft Depot
                          Maintenance.
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to        .......................                  -10,879
                          OM,ANG for C-130s.
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to        .......................                   -5,809
                          OM,AFR for C-130s.
011R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                1,556,234                1,664,886
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         Transfer of Range Maintenance from     .......................                  +33,652
                          SAG 011D.
                         Adjustments to Meet Life, Health,      .......................                  +75,000
                          Safety and ADA Compliance Standards.
011Z...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                3,088,003                2,937,621
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -91,675
                          Execution.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -58,707
                          Personnel.
012A...................  GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING.........                1,511,243                1,450,927
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -16,013
                          Personnel.
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -44,303
                          Execution.
012C...................  OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT                      1,035,291                1,020,300
                          PROGRAMS.

[[Page 1877]]

 
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -12,268
                          Execution.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                   -2,723
                          Personnel.
012F...................  TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL                      595,028                  595,028
                          ACTIVITIES.
013A...................  LAUNCH FACILITIES....................                  342,355                  342,355
013C...................  SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS................                  811,022                  811,022
015A...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION                    797,754                  791,754
                          SUPPORT.
                         Information Operations...............  .......................                   -6,000
015B...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS.                  233,021                  225,865
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                   -7,156
                          Personnel.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........               20,989,427               20,676,478
 
021A...................  AIRLIFT OPERATIONS...................                2,975,663                2,975,663
021D...................  MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS............                  158,647                  158,647
021M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  140,286                  140,286
021R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  348,231                  348,231
                          MODERNIZATION.
021Z...................  BASE SUPPORT.........................                  683,286                  635,231
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -45,577
                          Personnel.
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                   -2,478
                          Execution.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2..........                4,306,113                4,258,058
 
031A...................  OFFICER ACQUISITION..................                  114,403                  114,403
031B...................  RECRUIT TRAINING.....................                   28,195                   28,195
031D...................  RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)                   90,453                   90,453
031R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  411,570                  400,652
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -10,918
                          Personnel.
031Z...................  BASE SUPPORT (ACADEMIES ONLY)........                  902,323                  845,576
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -16,216
                          Execution.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -40,531
                          Personnel.
032A...................  SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING...........                  510,065                  470,584
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -11,481
                          Personnel.
                         Growth in Overhead Expenses not        .......................                  -28,000
                          Justified by Increases to Training
                          Metrics.
032B...................  FLIGHT TRAINING......................                1,012,816                1,012,816
032C...................  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION...                  221,553                  221,553
032D...................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                  126,784                  123,260
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                   -3,524
                          Personnel.
032M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                      619                      619
033A...................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                  150,222                  143,635
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                   -1,487
                          Personnel.
                         Air Force Recruiting Information       .......................                   -5,100
                          Support System--Air Force Requested
                          Transfer to RDTE,AF.
033B...................  EXAMINING............................                      409                      409
033C...................  OFF DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.....                  172,643                  172,643
033D...................  CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING......                  208,872                  208,872
033E...................  JUNIOR ROTC..........................                   77,692                   81,692
                         Program Increase--Junior ROTC........  .......................                   +4,000
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3..........                4,028,619                3,915,362
 
041A...................  LOGISTICS OPERATIONS.................                1,110,471                1,082,427
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -28,044
                          Personnel.
041B...................  TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.........                  949,018                  937,913
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                   -5,866
                          Execution.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                   -5,239
                          Personnel.
041M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                    7,365                    7,365
041R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  368,349                  367,651
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                     -698
                          Personnel.
041Z...................  BASE SUPPORT.........................                1,363,230                1,292,621
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -30,609
                          Personnel.
                         Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Fund  .......................                  -40,000
                          Pricing.
042A...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                  657,268                  657,268
042B...................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                  693,379                  672,562
                         Unjustified Growth for Programming/    .......................                  -20,817
                          Execution.
042G...................  OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.........                1,152,877                1,138,670
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -22,207
                          Personnel.
                         Analytical Support for the Executive   .......................                   +8,000
                          Agent for Space--Transfer from
                          RDTE,AF line 216.
042I...................  CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION.........                   22,848                   27,048
                         Civil Air Patrol Program Increase....  .......................                   +4,200
043A...................  SECURITY PROGRAMS....................                1,159,342                1,141,160
                         Unsupported Request for Civilian       .......................                  -18,182
                          Personnel.
044A...................  INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT................                   36,206                   36,206
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                7,520,353                7,360,891
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                 -134,300
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                         FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR          .......................                  -13,500
                          INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
                          PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
                          RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR               36,844,512               36,062,989
                          FORCE.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
 
                         JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF................                  420,940                  420,940
                         SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND...........                3,944,330                3,930,330
                         Non-Standard Aviation Platforms        .......................                   -5,000
                          Sustainment and Logistical Support.
                         Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010   .......................                   -9,000
                          Congressional Increases.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                4,365,270                4,351,270
 
                         DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY.......                  145,896                  145,896
                         NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY..........                   97,633                   97,633
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3..........                  243,529                  243,529
 
                         CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS..............                  156,043                  164,043
                         STARBASE Youth Program...............  .......................                   +8,000
                         BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION AGENCY.......                  143,441                  143,441
                         DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY........                  486,143                  482,643
                         Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010   .......................                   -3,500
                          Cost for Renewing Three Year License
                          for Software.
                         DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING                           1,593                    1,593
                          SERVICE.
                         DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY...                1,384,450                1,374,450
                         Multinational Information Sharing      .......................                  -10,000
                          Programs.
                         DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY........                   42,404                   42,404
                         DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY.............                  448,043                  396,395
                         Facilities Sustainment...............  .......................                  -58,848
                         Procurement Technical Assistance       .......................                   +7,200
                          Program.
                         DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY...............                  255,878                  255,878
                         DEFENSE POW /MISSING PERSONS OFFICE..                   24,155                   24,155
                         DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY...                   37,624                   37,624
                         DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY......                  463,522                  445,682
                         Core Operational Support Activities--  .......................                  -17,840
                          unnecessary increase.
                         DEFENSE DEPENDENTS EDUCATION.........                2,514,537                2,679,537
                         Military Spouse Career Advancement     .......................                 +165,000
                          Accounts.
                         DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY.....                  824,153                  794,353
                         Joint Advertising, Market Research     .......................                  -29,800
                          and Studies.
                         DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY...                1,112,849                1,107,849
                         Overstatement of NSPS to GS            .......................                   -5,000
                          Conversion.
                         DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY..                  683,853                  539,369
                         Global Train and Equip (1206)........  .......................                 -139,507
                         Stability Operations Fellowship        .......................                   -4,977
                          Program--not authorized.

[[Page 1878]]

 
                         DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE.............                  518,743                  518,743
                         OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT........                   50,811                   50,811
                         OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE...                2,245,300                2,232,986
                         Battlefield Information Collection     .......................                  -15,000
                          and Exploitation System.
                         Combatant Commander's Exercise         .......................                  -26,500
                          Engagement and Training
                          Transformation (CE2T2).
                         Readiness and Environmental            .......................                  +60,186
                          Protection Initiative.
                         Overstatement of Civilian Personnel    .......................                  -24,500
                          Pay Requirements.
                         AT&L--Integrated Acquisition           .......................                   -6,500
                          Environment Internal Realignment not
                          Properly Accounted for in Budget
                          Documentation.
                         WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES.....                  604,130                  594,330
                         Overstatement of Civilian Personnel    .......................                   -9,800
                          Pay Requirements.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........               11,997,672               11,886,286
 
                         OTHER PROGRAMS.......................               13,977,425               13,685,725
                         Classified Adjustments...............  .......................                 -291,700
                         IMPACT AID...........................  .......................                   40,000
                         IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE    .......................                    4,000
                          DISABILITIES.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                   30,583,896               30,210,810
                          DEFENSE-WIDE.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE
 
111....................  MANEUVER UNITS.......................                    1,282                    1,282
112....................  MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.............                   12,413                   12,413
113....................  ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES..............                  460,814                  460,814
114....................  THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.................                  168,020                  168,020
115....................  LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.......                  555,944                  555,944
116....................  AVIATION ASSETS......................                   70,378                   70,378
121....................  FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT..                  391,326                  381,326
  .....................  Decrease Requested Growth for Travel.  .......................                  -10,000
122....................  LAND FORCES SYSTEM READINESS.........                  108,093                  108,093
123....................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  136,854                  136,854
131....................  BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT..............                  577,146                  567,146
  .....................  Unjustified Increase in Motor Pool     .......................                  -10,000
                          Operations Costs.
132....................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  234,486                  234,486
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                2,716,756                2,696,756
 
421....................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                   12,717                   12,717
431....................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                   74,685                   74,685
432....................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                    3,797                    3,797
433....................  PERSONNEL/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION...                    9,245                    9,245
434....................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                   61,877                   61,877
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                  162,321                  162,321
 
  .....................  UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                  -18,650
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    2,879,077                2,840,427
                          ARMY RESERVE.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE
 
1A1A...................  MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS..                  599,649                  599,649
1A3A...................  INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE.............                   13,209                   13,209
1A4A...................  AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT....                    2,668                    2,668
1A5A...................  AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE...........                  140,377                  140,377
1A6A...................  AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT....                      309                      309
1B1B...................  MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS....                   65,757                   62,757
                         Mismatch of OPTEMPO and Steaming Day   .......................                   -3,000
                          Performance Data.
1B2B...................  SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING                      587                      587
1B4B...................  SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE...............                   91,054                   91,054
1C1C...................  COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................                   15,882                   15,882
1C6C...................  COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................                  140,186                  140,186
1D4D...................  WEAPONS MAINTENANCE..................                    5,492                    5,492
BSIT...................  ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY....                   56,046                   56,046
BSMR...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                   81,407                   81,407
                          MODERNIZATION.
BSSR...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                  131,988                  131,988
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                1,344,611                1,341,611
 
4A1M...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                    3,276                    3,276
4A4M...................  MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL........                   13,698                   13,698
4A6M...................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                    2,628                    2,628
4B3N...................  ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT...                    3,551                    3,551
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                   23,153                   23,153
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                  -20,500
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    1,367,764                1,344,264
                          NAVY RESERVE.
 
                                 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE
 
1A1A...................  OPERATING FORCES.....................                  104,566                  104,566
1A3A...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                   16,392                   16,392
BSM1...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                   38,762                   38,762
                          MODERNIZATION.
BSS1...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                   99,924                   92,424
                         Eliminate Growth in Administrative     .......................                   -7,500
                          Costs.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                  259,644                  252,144
 
BSM1...................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                      835                      835
BSS1...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                   15,871                   15,871
3A1C...................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                    8,884                    8,884
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                   25,590                   25,590
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                   -2,250
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                           TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    285,234                  275,484
                          MARINE CORPS RESERVE.
 
                                  OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE
 
011A...................  PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES................                2,275,407                2,276,450
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to        .......................                   -2,017
                          OM,ANG for C-130s.
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                   +3,060
                          OM,AF for C-130s.
011G...................  MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS...........                  111,742                  111,742
011M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  415,687                  418,436
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                   +2,749
                          OM,AF for C-130s.
011R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                   88,822                   88,822
                          MODERNIZATION.
011Z...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                  277,985                  277,985
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                3,169,643                3,173,435
 
042A...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                   80,526                   80,526
042J...................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                   24,353                   24,353
042K...................  MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL                         19,716                   19,716
                          MANAGEMENT.
042L...................  OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT..............                    6,071                    6,071
042M...................  AUDIOVISUAL..........................                      726                      726
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                  131,392                  131,392
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                   13,800
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                           TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                  3,301,035                3,291,027
                          AIR FORCE RESERVE.
 
                                 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
 
111....................  MANEUVER UNITS.......................                  807,193                  807,193

[[Page 1879]]

 
112....................  MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.............                  166,474                  166,474
113....................  ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE...............                  607,567                  607,567
114....................  THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.................                  249,930                  249,930
115....................  LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.......                   35,657                   35,657
116....................  AVIATION ASSETS......................                  838,895                  854,895
                         Aircraft Maintenance Program Increase  .......................                  +16,000
121....................  FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT...                  570,119                  544,119
                         Distance Learning--Transfer from OCO   .......................                   +9,000
                          OM,ARNG SAG 135.
                         Realignment of Funding for the         .......................                  -35,000
                          Organizational Clothing and
                          Equipment Enterprise Environment not
                          Properly Accounted for in Budget
                          Documentation.
122....................  LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS........                  121,980                  121,980
123....................  LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE........                  380,789                  380,789
131....................  BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT..............                  933,514                  853,514
                         Unjustified Growth for Information     .......................                  -80,000
                          Management Systems.
132....................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  621,843                  661,843
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         Army National Guard Program Increase.  .......................                  +40,000
133....................  MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL                             540,738                  549,626
                          HEADQUARTERS.
                         Transfer from Defense Health Program   .......................                   +8,888
                          for Psychological Health--State
                          Directors for the National Guard.
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                5,874,699                5,833,587
 
421....................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                   17,771                   17,771
431....................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                  183,781                  151,463
                         Pay and Benefits Mismatch Between Op-  .......................                  -32,318
                          5 and Op-32.
432....................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                   48,188                   48,188
433....................  MANPOWER MANAGEMENT..................                    8,020                    8,020
434....................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                  440,245                  440,245
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                  698,005                  665,687
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                  -36,650
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                         FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR          .......................                   -8,000
                          INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
                          PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
                          RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                           TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                  6,572,704                6,454,624
                          ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.
 
                                  OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD
 
011F...................  AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS..................                3,519,452                3,525,525
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                   +2,017
                          OM,AFR for C-130s.
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                   +4,056
                          OM,AF for C-130s.
011G...................  MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS...........                  762,937                  762,937
011M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  598,779                  605,602
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                   +6,823
                          OM,AF for C-130s.
011R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  315,210                  355,210
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         Air National Guard Program Increase..  .......................                  +40,000
011Z...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                  668,176                  668,176
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1..........                5,864,554                5,917,450
 
042A...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                   41,930                   41,930
042J...................  RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING...........                   34,659                   34,659
                         SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4..........                   76,589                   76,589
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO         .......................                  -30,200
                          HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR                5,941,143                5,963,839
                          NATIONAL GUARD.
 
                                                  MISCELLANEOUS
 
                         OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS                          5,000                        0
                          TRANSFER ACCOUNT.
                         Unjustified Request..................  .......................                   -5,000
                         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED                     14,068                   14,068
                          FORCES.
                         ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY......                  444,581                  464,581
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                  +20,000
                         ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY......                  304,867                  304,867
                         ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE.                  502,653                  502,653
                         ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-                     10,744                   10,744
                          WIDE.
                         ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FUDS......                  276,546                  316,546
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                  +40,000
                         OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND                   108,032                  108,032
                          CIVIC AID.
                         COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM.                  522,512                  522,512
                         ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT                      217,561                  217,561
                          FUND.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.....              167,878,542              165,560,124
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          P-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
 
3......................  AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP).....                   88,483                        0
                         Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip.  .......................                  -88,483
4......................  MQ-1 UAV.............................                  459,310                  434,310
                         Contract Savings.....................  .......................                  -25,000
5......................  RQ-11 (RAVEN)........................                   20,152                   20,152
6......................  BCT UNMANNED AERIAL VEH (UAVS) INCR 1                   44,206                   26,568
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -17,638
8......................  HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)......                  305,272                  305,272
9......................  AH-64 APACHE BLOCK III...............                  332,681                  332,681
10.....................  AH-64 APACHE BLOCK III (AP-CY).......                  161,150                  161,150
11.....................  UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP)................                1,250,566                1,250,566
12.....................  UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) (AP-CY)........                  100,532                  100,532
13.....................  CH-47 HELICOPTER.....................                1,101,293                1,101,293
14.....................  CH-47 HELICOPTER (AP-CY).............                   57,756                   57,756
15.....................  HELICOPTER NEW TRAINING..............                    9,383                        0
                         Unjustified Request..................  .......................                   -9,383
17.....................  MQ-1 PAYLOAD - UAS...................                  100,413                   80,413
                         Tactical SIGINT Payload Schedule       .......................                  -20,000
                          Adjustment.
18.....................  MQ-1 WEAPONIZATION - UAS.............                   14,729                   14,729
19.....................  GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP).................                   29,899                   25,799
                         Airborne Precision Geolocation.......  .......................                   -4,100
20.....................  MULTI SENSOR AIRBORNE RECON (MIP)....                   16,981                   16,981
21.....................  AH-64 MODS...........................                  393,769                  393,769
23.....................  CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS..........                   66,207                   66,207
25.....................  UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS..........                   13,716                   13,716
26.....................  AIRCRAFT LONG RANGE MODS.............                      814                      814
27.....................  UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS..............                   63,085                   80,085
                         UH-60 A to L conversions.............  .......................                  +17,000
28.....................  KIOWA WARRIOR........................                   94,400                   42,300
                         Cockpit and Sensor Upgrade Program     .......................                  -52,100
                          Funding Ahead of Need.
29.....................  AIRBORNE AVIONICS....................                  219,425                  207,425
                         Contract Savings.....................  .......................                  -12,000
30.....................  GATM ROLLUP..........................                  100,862                  100,862
31.....................  RQ-7 UAV MODS........................                  505,015                    2,515
                         Funding Ahead of Need for              .......................                   -5,000
                          Installation.
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -497,500
34.....................  SPARE PARTS (AIR)....................                    7,328                    9,956
                         Transfer from OP,A line 195 at Army    .......................                   +2,628
                          request.

[[Page 1880]]

 
35.....................  AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT.....                   24,478                   24,478
36.....................  ASE INFRARED COUNTER MEASURES........                  174,222                  163,722
                         Excess to Requirement................  .......................                  -10,500
37.....................  AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........                    4,885                    4,885
38.....................  COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT..............                   76,129                   76,129
39.....................  AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS...........                   52,423                   52,423
40.....................  AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL..................                   82,844                   82,844
41.....................  INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES................                    1,567                    1,567
42.....................  LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET................                    2,892                    2,892
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY....                5,976,867                5,254,791
 
                                            MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
 
1......................  PATRIOT SYSTEM SUMMARY...............                  480,247                  613,847
                         PAC-3 Launchers and Missiles - Army    .......................                 +133,600
                          UFR.
2......................  SURFACE-LAUNCHED AMRAAM SYS SUMMARY..                  116,732                  102,732
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -14,000
4......................  HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY.................                   31,881                   31,881
5......................  JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY......                  163,929                  163,929
6......................  TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY.................                   30,326                   24,326
                         Program Adjustment for Growth in       .......................                   -6,000
                          Management and Administration Costs.
7......................  TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (AP-CY).........                   48,355                        0
                         Excess to Requirement................  .......................                  -48,355
8......................  BCT NON LINE OF SIGHT LAUNCH SYSTEM..                  350,574                        0
                         Program Termination..................  .......................                 -350,574
9......................  GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)...........                  291,041                  266,041
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -25,000
10.....................  MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS                     15,886                   15,886
                          (RRPR).
11.....................  HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM                  211,517                  204,517
                         Program Adjustment, Carriers Procured  .......................                   -7,000
                          in fiscal year 2010.
12.....................  PATRIOT MODS.........................                   57,170                   57,170
13.....................  ITAS/TOW MODS........................                   13,281                   13,281
14.....................  MLRS MODS............................                    8,217                    8,217
15.....................  HIMARS MODIFICATIONS.................                   39,371                   39,371
16.....................  HELLFIRE MODIFICATIONS...............                       10                       10
17.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                   19,569                   19,569
18.....................  AIR DEFENSE TARGETS..................                    3,613                    3,613
19.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES).....                    1,208                    1,208
20.....................  PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT..............                    4,510                    4,510
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY.....                1,887,437                1,570,108
 
                            PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES, ARMY
 
4......................  STRYKER VEHICLE......................                  299,545                  350,945
                         Transfer from OP,A line 9............  .......................                  +61,300
                         Adjust Program Management Costs......  .......................                   -9,900
9......................  STRYKER (MOD)........................                  146,352                   85,052
                         Transfer to OP,A line 4..............  .......................                  -61,300
10.....................  FIST VEHICLE (MOD)...................                   31,083                   31,083
11.....................  BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)................                  215,133                  204,133
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -11,000
12.....................  HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6                       105,277                    5,277
                          (MOD).
                         Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip.  .......................                  -70,000
                         Transfer to RDTE,A line 116 for        .......................                  -30,000
                          Paladin PIM.
13.....................  IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2                        69,609                   69,609
                          HERCULES).
14.....................  ARMORED BREACHER VEHICLE.............                   77,930                   77,930
15.....................  M88 FOV MODS.........................                    9,157                    9,157
16.....................  JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE.................                   44,133                        0
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -44,133
17.....................  M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD).................                  230,907                  230,907
18.....................  ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM...............                  183,000                  183,000
19.....................  PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)...                    3,145                    3,145
20.....................  HOWITZER, LIGHT, TOWED, 105MM, M119..                    5,575                        0
                         Funds Excess to Requirement..........  .......................                   -5,575
21.....................  M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM).....                   28,179                   20,479
                         Pricing Correction...................  .......................                   -7,700
22.....................  MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL.........                   79,496                        0
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                  -79,496
23.....................  LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN..                   18,941                   18,941
25.....................  MK-19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN (40MM).....                    4,465                    4,465
26.....................  MORTAR SYSTEMS.......................                   17,082                   17,082
27.....................  M107, CAL. 50, SNIPER RIFLE..........                      235                      235
28.....................  XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)..                   16,282                   16,282
29.....................  M110 SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM                        5,159                    5,159
                          (SASS).
30.....................  M4 CARBINE...........................                   20,180                   20,180
31.....................  SHOTGUN, MODULAR ACCESSORY SYSTEM                        7,153                    7,153
                          (MASS).
33.....................  HANDGUN..............................                    3,371                        0
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                   -3,371
35.....................  MK-19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS.......                    4,286                    2,986
                         Tactical Engagement Simulator          .......................                   -1,300
                          Terminated.
36.....................  M4 CARBINE MODS......................                   14,044                   14,044
38.....................  M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS............                    5,922                    5,922
39.....................  M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS.........                   15,852                   15,852
40.....................  M119 MODIFICATIONS...................                   39,810                   39,810
41.....................  M16 RIFLE MODS.......................                    3,855                    3,855
43.....................  MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-                     6,083                    6,083
                          WTCV).
45.....................  PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)..                    7,869                    7,869
46.....................  INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS..............                      409                      409
47.....................  SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH                        4,042                    4,042
                          PROG).
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY....                1,723,561                1,461,086
 
                                         PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
 
1......................  CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES...............                  195,406                  195,406
2......................  CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES...............                   79,622                   79,622
3......................  CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES..............                    5,377                    5,377
4......................  CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES..............                  160,712                  160,712
6......................  CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES.................                   15,887                   15,887
7......................  CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES.................                   95,222                   95,222
8......................  CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES.................                  167,632                  167,632
9......................  60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES...............                   14,340                   14,340
10.....................  81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES...............                   24,036                   24,036
11.....................  CTG, MORTAR, 120MM, ALL TYPES........                   96,335                   67,735
                         APMI Unit Cost Savings...............  .......................                  -28,600
12.....................  CTG TANK 105MM: ALL TYPES............                    7,794                    7,794
13.....................  CTG, TANK, 120MM, ALL TYPES..........                  114,798                  114,798
14.....................  CTG, ARTY, 75MM: ALL TYPES...........                    7,329                    7,329
15.....................  CTG, ARTY, 105MM: ALL TYPES..........                   76,658                   76,658
16.....................  CTG, ARTY, 155MM, ALL TYPES..........                   45,752                   45,752
17.....................  PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982......                   62,114                   30,700

[[Page 1881]]

 
                         Exceeds Revised Requirement..........  .......................                  -31,414
18.....................  MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGE SYSTEM                         29,309                   21,909
                          (MACS), ALL T.
                         Decrease to Reduce Backlog in MACS     .......................                   -7,400
                          M232 Production.
19.....................  ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES...........                   25,047                   15,047
                         Program Delay, Precision Guidance Kit  .......................                  -10,000
20.....................  MINES, ALL TYPES.....................                      817                      817
21.....................  MINE, CLEARING CHARGE, ALL TYPES.....                    8,000                    8,000
22.....................  ANTIPERSONNEL LANDMINE ALTERNATIVES..                   53,005                    8,317
                         FRD Slipped to fiscal year 2012......  .......................                  -44,688
23.....................  INTELLIGENT MUNITIONS SYSTEM (IMS),                     10,246                        0
                          ALL TYPES.
                         Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip.  .......................                  -10,246
24.....................  SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL                        43,873                   43,873
                          TYPES.
25.....................  ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES..........                  120,628                  120,628
26.....................  DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES......                   19,824                   19,824
27.....................  GRENADES, ALL TYPES..................                   41,803                   41,803
28.....................  SIGNALS, ALL TYPES...................                   39,472                   39,472
29.....................  SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES................                   11,389                   11,389
30.....................  AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES...........                   17,499                   17,499
31.....................  NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES.....                    5,266                    5,266
32.....................  CAD/PAD ALL TYPES....................                    5,322                    5,322
33.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                    9,768                    9,768
34.....................  AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT........                   12,721                   12,721
35.....................  FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION                        11,786                   11,786
                          (AMMO).
36.....................  CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES.................                      100                      100
37.....................  PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES...                  144,368                  144,368
38.....................  LAYAWAY OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES.....                    9,504                    9,504
39.....................  MAINTENANCE OF INACTIVE FACILITIES...                    9,025                    9,025
40.....................  CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS                                 178,367                  178,367
                          DEMILITARIZATION, ALL.
41.....................  ARMS INITIATIVE......................                    3,261                    3,261
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION,                    1,979,414                1,847,066
                          ARMY.
 
                                             OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
 
1......................  TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS.........                   25,560                        0
                         Army Requested Program Adjustment....  .......................                  -25,560
2......................  SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:...............                   38,713                        0
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -38,713
5......................  FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).                  918,195                  693,495
                         Pricing Adjustment...................  .......................                 -224,700
6......................  FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING                    21,317                   21,317
                          EQUIPMEN.
7......................  FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES                      549,741                  549,741
                          (FHTV).
8......................  PALLETIZED LOAD SYS--EXTENDED SERVICE                  100,108                   56,208
                          PGM.
                         Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip.  .......................                  -43,900
9......................  ARMORED SECURITY VEHICLES (ASV)......                  114,478                  114,478
10.....................  MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY.......                  230,978                        0
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -230,978
12.....................  TRUCK, TRACTOR, LINE HAUL, M915/M916.                   37,519                   21,519
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -16,000
13.....................  HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK                     173,565                  173,565
                          EXT SERV.
15.....................  MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP.........                  349,256                        0
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -56,300
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -292,956
17.....................  TOWING DEVICE-FIFTH WHEEL............                      234                      234
18.....................  AMC CRITICAL ITEMS, OPA1.............                      746                      746
19.....................  HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN..................                    1,875                        0
                         Slow Execution.......................  .......................                   -1,875
20.....................  PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES..........                    3,323                    1,323
                         Slow Execution.......................  .......................                   -2,000
21.....................  NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER..........                   19,586                   19,586
23.....................  JOINT COMBAT IDENTIFICATION MARKING                     11,411                   11,411
                          SYSTEM.
24.....................  WIN-T--GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK                  421,798                  391,798
                         Program Adjustment, Increment 2 Slow   .......................                  -20,000
                          Execution.
                         Program Adjustment, Area Common User   .......................                  -10,000
                          System Modernization Slow Execution.
25.....................  JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)............                    4,690                    4,690
26.....................  DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM                     115,744                  115,744
                          SYSTEMS.
27.....................  SHF TERM.............................                   14,198                   14,198
28.....................  SAT TERM, EMUT (SPACE)...............                      662                      662
29.....................  NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM                       32,193                   32,193
                          (SPACE).
30.....................  SMART-T (SPACE)......................                   10,285                   10,285
31.....................  SCAMP (SPACE)........................                      930                      930
32.....................  GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--GBS...............                    4,586                    4,586
33.....................  MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)........                    1,506                    1,506
34.....................  MOD-IN-SERVICE PROFILER..............                      938                      938
35.....................  ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS)                   20,387                   20,387
36.....................  ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA                        700                      700
                          RADIO).
37.....................  JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM..........                  209,568                  159,468
                         Program Reduction in Small Form        .......................                   -5,000
                          Factor-C Radio.
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -45,100
38.....................  RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)......                    5,796                    5,796
39.....................  SINCGARS FAMILY......................                   14,504                   12,604
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                   -1,900
40.....................  AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--OPA2.............                    3,860                    3,860
41.....................  MULTI-PURPOSE INFORMATION OPERATIONS                     9,501                    9,501
                          SYSTEMS.
42.....................  COMMS-ELEC EQUIP FIELDING............                    5,965                    5,965
43.....................  SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT......                   26,358                    6,758
                         Army Requested Program Adjustment....  .......................                  -19,600
44.....................  INTELLIGENT MUNITIONS SYSTEM REMOTE                      6,603                        0
                          CONTROL UNIT.
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -6,603
45.....................  SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM AND                     5,125                    5,125
                          ELECTRONICS.
46.....................  COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR (CSEL)                    2,397                    2,397
47.....................  RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY.....                    9,983                    9,983
48.....................  MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE                      23,606                   23,606
                          (MC4).
49.....................  CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP).....                    1,465                    1,465
50.....................  TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS)........                   25,959                   25,959
51.....................  INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-                    63,340                   54,858
                          ISSP.
                         Protected Information--Biometrics--    .......................                   -8,482
                          Transfer to OP,A line 51x.
51x....................  FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS.................                        0                    8,482
                         Non-MIP Biometrics--Transfer from      .......................                   +8,482
                          OP,A line 51.
52.....................  TERRESTRIAL TRANSMISSION.............                      137                      137
53.....................  BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS..........                   28,406                   28,406
54.....................  WW TECH CON IMP PROG (WWTCIP)........                   11,566                   11,566
55.....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS..................                  201,081                  201,081
56.....................  DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS).........                    6,264                    6,264
57.....................  INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD                   178,242                  178,242
                          PROGRAM.
58.....................  PENTAGON INFORMATION MGT AND TELECOM.                   10,427                   10,427
64.....................  JTT/CIBS-M (MIP).....................                    3,321                    3,321
65.....................  PROPHET GROUND (MIP).................                   71,517                   71,517
68.....................  DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC SPT SYS (DTSS)                         441                      441
                          (MIP).
70.....................  DCGS-A (MIP).........................                  137,424                        0
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -137,424

[[Page 1882]]

 
71.....................  JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)                    9,279                    9,279
72.....................  TROJAN (MIP).........................                   28,345                   28,345
73.....................  MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)                    7,602                    7,602
74.....................  CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND                              7,416                    7,416
                          COLL(CHARCS)(MIP).
75.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP)..........                   18,721                   18,721
76.....................  LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR.....                   32,980                   80,080
                         Program Adjustment...................  .......................                  +47,100
77.....................  WARLOCK..............................                   24,127                   16,127
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                   -8,000
78.....................  BCT UNATTENDED GROUND SENSOR.........                   29,718                   14,718
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -15,000
79.....................  COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY                             1,394                    1,394
                          COUNTERMEASURES.
80.....................  CI MODERNIZATION (MIP)...............                    1,263                    1,263
81.....................  FORWARD AREA AIR DEFENSE--GROUND                        91,467                   91,467
                          BASED SENSOR.
82.....................  SENTINEL MODS........................                   30,976                   30,976
83.....................  SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW)........                   24,939                   24,939
84.....................  NIGHT VISION DEVICES.................                   70,528                   70,528
85.....................  LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT                              255,641                  230,641
                          SURVEILLANCE SYS.
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -25,000
86.....................  NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT......                  248,899                  248,899
87.....................  SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED                     8,520                    8,520
                          MLRF.
89.....................  COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR...                    2,088                    2,088
91.....................  ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP.............                    6,042                        0
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -6,042
94.....................  PROFILER.............................                    4,408                    4,408
95.....................  MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER                          2,843                    2,843
                          RADARS).
96.....................  FORCE XXI BATTLE CMD BRIGADE & BELOW                    39,786                   39,786
                          (FBCB2).
97.....................  JOINT BATTLE COMMAND--PLATFORM (JBC-                       147                      147
                          P).
98.....................  LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/                           65,970                   65,970
                          RANGEFINDER.
99.....................  COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32......                      815                      815
100....................  MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM...........                   16,475                   16,475
101....................  COUNTERFIRE RADARS...................                  275,867                        0
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -275,867
102....................  ENHANCED SENSOR & MONITORING SYSTEM..                    2,062                    2,062
103....................  TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS..........                   53,768                   43,768
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -10,000
104....................  FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY...............                   49,077                   49,077
105....................  BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT                      25,866                   25,866
                          SYSTEM.
106....................  FAAD C2..............................                   42,511                   32,511
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -10,000
107....................  AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL                    57,038                   57,038
                          SYS.
108....................  KNIGHT FAMILY........................                  120,723                  120,723
109....................  LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)...                    1,710                    1,710
110....................  AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY..                   10,858                   10,858
111....................  TC AIMS II...........................                   10,457                   10,457
113....................  TACTICAL INTERNET MANAGER............                    1,594                    1,594
114....................  NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND                   18,492                   18,492
                          SERVICE.
115....................  MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)........                   96,162                   96,162
116....................  SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE                        99,819                   99,819
                          (SALE).
117....................  RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING                            15,466                   15,466
                          INSTRUMENT SET.
119....................  GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS                        97,858                   97,858
                          SYSTEM.
120....................  ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION..........                   36,158                   36,158
121....................  AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT..                  203,864                  203,864
122....................  CSS COMMUNICATIONS...................                   39,811                   39,811
123....................  RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS                        39,360                   39,360
                          (RCAS).
124....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V)..........                      663                      663
125....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING                           6,467                    6,467
                          EQUIPMENT).
128....................  PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)........                      542                      542
129....................  BCT NETWORK..........................                  176,543                  136,543
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -40,000
130....................  PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS...................                    2,489                    2,489
131....................  FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)                    9,305                    9,305
132....................  CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION..............                  180,351                  180,351
133....................  SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON                         831                      831
                          AAO ITEM).
134....................  TACTICAL BRIDGING....................                   62,817                   62,817
135....................  TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON........                  105,837                  105,837
136....................  HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION                   43,871                   43,871
                          SYS.
137....................  GROUND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM                   35,002                   35,002
138....................  EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT                   54,093                   54,093
139....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M, COUNTERMINE                         3,655                    3,655
                          EQUIPMENT.
141....................  HEATERS AND ECU'S....................                   20,610                   20,610
143....................  SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT..................                    5,416                    5,416
146....................  PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM                        7,813                    7,813
                          (PRSS).
147....................  GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM................                  110,524                   96,024
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -14,500
148....................  MOUNTED SOLDIER SYSTEM...............                   38,872                   38,872
149....................  FORCE PROVIDER.......................                   41,539                   41,539
150....................  FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT..............                   23,826                   23,826
151....................  CARGO AERIAL DELIVERY AND PERSONNEL                     69,496                   69,496
                          PARACHUTE SYSTEM.
152....................  MOBILE INTEGRATED REMAINS COLLECTION                    26,532                   26,532
                          SYSTEM.
153....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENGINEER                           31,420                   31,420
                          SUPPORT).
154....................  DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM AND                    175,069                  164,369
                          WATER.
                         Program Adjustment...................  .......................                  -10,700
155....................  WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS...........                    3,597                        0
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -3,597
156....................  COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL...............                   30,365                   30,365
157....................  MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.                  159,285                  139,985
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -19,300
158....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ).....                    3,702                    3,702
159....................  GRADER, ROAD MOTORIZED, HVY, 6X4                        48,379                   48,379
                          (CCE).
160....................  SKID STEER LOADER (SSL) FAMILY OF                       17,498                   17,498
                          SYSTEM.
161....................  SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING................                   12,452                   12,452
163....................  MISSION MODULES--ENGINEERING.........                   62,111                   54,111
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                   -8,000
164....................  LOADERS..............................                    7,205                    7,205
165....................  HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR..................                    8,458                    8,458
166....................  TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED................                   64,032                   64,032
167....................  PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING................                   10,783                   10,783
168....................  HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR                        64,959                   60,959
                          (HMEE) FOS.
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                   -4,000
169....................  CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ESP...........                   11,063                   11,063
170....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONSTRUCTION                     20,565                   17,565
                          EQUIP).
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                   -3,000
171....................  JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV).......                  202,764                  202,764
172....................  HARBORMASTER COMMAND AND CONTROL                        37,683                   37,683
                          CENTER(HCCC).
173....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)...                    8,052                    8,052
174....................  GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT..                  113,573                  113,573
175....................  ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER                         29,460                   29,460
                          (RTCH).
176....................  FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS..................                   12,936                   12,936
177....................  ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM......                   17,352                   17,352

[[Page 1883]]

 
178....................  COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT......                   23,400                   23,400
179....................  TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM..........                  297,200                  322,200
                         Training Range Upgrades..............  .......................                  +25,000
180....................  CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER........                   64,912                   64,912
181....................  AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL                         26,120                   26,120
                          TRAINER.
182....................  GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY                     4,964                    4,964
                          TRAINING.
183....................  CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT...........                   38,778                   38,778
184....................  INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT                    104,472                  104,472
                          (IFTE).
185....................  TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD).                   19,166                   18,166
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -1,000
186....................  RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT                         42,229                   21,229
                          EQUIPMENT.
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -21,000
187....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3).....                   56,195                   56,195
188....................  BASE LEVEL COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT......                    1,873                    1,873
189....................  MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-                 103,046                   82,046
                          3).
                         Program Adjustment...................  .......................                  -21,000
190....................  PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)........                    2,233                    2,233
192....................  SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING...                   44,483                   44,483
193....................  AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3..............                   13,104                   13,104
194....................  MA8975...............................                    3,894                    3,894
195....................  BCT UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE..........                   20,046                   20,046
196....................  BCT TRAINING/LOGISTICS/MANAGEMENT....                   61,581                   31,581
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -30,000
197....................  INITIAL SPARES--C&E..................                   38,707                   36,079
                         Transfer to AP,A line 34 at Army       .......................                   -2,628
                          request.
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                    2,560                    2,560
xx.....................  PROCUREMENT INNOVATION...............                        0                   15,000
                         Procurement Innovation...............  .......................                  +15,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY.......                9,765,808                8,145,665
 
                                           AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
 
1......................  EA-18G...............................                1,028,801                  971,241
                         Multi-year Procurement Savings.......  .......................                  -49,836
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -7,724
2......................  EA-18G (AP-CY).......................                   55,081                   55,081
3......................  F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP).....                1,784,894                1,684,086
                         Multi-year Procurement Savings.......  .......................                  -92,746
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -8,062
4......................  F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) (AP-                    2,295                    2,295
                          CY).
5......................  JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER.................                1,667,093                1,653,093
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                  -14,000
6......................  JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER ADVANCE                           219,895                  219,895
                          PROCUREMENT (CY).
7......................  JSF STOVL............................                2,289,816                  555,716
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                  -42,500
                         Delete Two Aircraft..................  .......................                 -391,600
                         Transfer Eight Aircraft to CTOL        .......................               -1,300,000
                          Variant.
8......................  JSF STOVL (AP-CY)....................                  286,326                  286,326
9......................  V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)...................                2,121,036                2,121,036
10.....................  V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP-CY)...........                   81,875                   81,875
11.....................  UH-1Y/AH-1Z..........................                  738,709                  738,709
12.....................  UH-1Y/AH-1Z (AP-CY)..................                   69,360                   58,560
                         Unjustified Cost Growth..............  .......................                  -10,800
13.....................  MH-60S (MYP).........................                  478,591                  478,591
14.....................  MH-60S (MYP) (AP-CY).................                   70,080                   66,280
                         Unexecutable EOQ.....................  .......................                   -3,800
15.....................  MH-60R...............................                  897,933                  897,933
16.....................  MH-60R (AP-CY).......................                  162,006                  129,006
                         Unexecutable EOQ.....................  .......................                  -33,000
17.....................  P-8A POSEIDON........................                1,824,437                1,820,560
                         Operational Flight Trainer Cost        .......................                   -2,155
                          Growth.
                         Weapons Tactics Trainer Cost Growth..  .......................                   -1,722
18.....................  P-8A POSEIDON (ADVANCED PROCUREMENT).                  166,153                  147,653
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -18,500
19.....................  E-2C (EARLY WARNING) HAWKEYE (MYP)...                  819,184                  819,184
20.....................  E-2C (EARLY WARNING) HAWKEYE (MYP)                     118,619                  118,619
                          (AP-CY).
21.....................  C-40A................................  .......................                   74,100
                         Add One Aircraft.....................  .......................                  +74,100
22.....................  JPATS................................                  266,065                   26,274
                         Contract Delay.......................  .......................                 -234,849
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -4,942
26.....................  MQ-8 UAV.............................                   47,484                   43,984
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -3,500
27.....................  STUASLO UAV..........................                   23,912                        0
                         Program Delay........................  .......................                  -23,912
29.....................  EA-6 SERIES..........................                   14,891                        0
                         Unjustified Request in Avionics and    .......................                   -8,900
                          Structural Improvements OSIP.
                         ICAP III OSIP Unjustified Request....  .......................                   -5,991
30.....................  AEA SYSTEMS..........................                   33,772                   29,972
                         Low Band Transmitter Modification Kit  .......................                   -1,400
                          Pricing.
                         ECO growth...........................  .......................                   -2,400
31.....................  AV-8 SERIES..........................                   19,386                   19,386
32.....................  F-18 SERIES..........................                  492,821                  443,806
                         ECP 904 Modification Kit Cost Growth.  .......................                   -2,310
                         ECP 583R2 Installation Equipment Kit   .......................                   -3,780
                          Cost Growth.
                         ATFLIR Installation Equipment Kit      .......................                  -11,745
                          Cost Growth.
                         Mission Planning/Unique Planning       .......................                   -2,400
                          Component Growth.
                         OSIP 002-07 Excess ECO Funding.......  .......................                   -9,000
                         ECP6279 Radar Modification Kits Ahead  .......................                   -7,880
                          of Need.
                         OSIP 001-10 Integrated Logistics       .......................                   -2,500
                          Support Growth.
                         Unjustified Cost Growth..............  .......................                   -9,400
33.....................  H-46 SERIES..........................                   17,685                   17,685
34.....................  AH-1W SERIES.........................                   11,011                   11,011
35.....................  H-53 SERIES..........................                   25,871                   25,871
36.....................  SH-60 SERIES.........................                   67,779                   67,779
37.....................  H-1 SERIES...........................                    3,060                    3,060
38.....................  EP-3 SERIES..........................                   90,323                   90,323
39.....................  P-3 SERIES...........................                  221,982                  186,982
                         Unjustified Cost Growth..............  .......................                  -35,000
40.....................  E-2 SERIES...........................                   47,046                   67,046
                         Reliability Enhancements for E-2C....  .......................                  +20,000
41.....................  TRAINER A/C SERIES...................                   23,999               23,9990634
42.....................  C-2A.................................                   16,020                   16,020
43.....................  C-130 SERIES.........................                   17,839                   17,839
44.....................  FEWSG................................                   21,928                   16,696
                         AN/ALQ-167 Modification Kit Cost       .......................                   -5,232
                          Growth.
45.....................  CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES...........                   16,092                   16,092
46.....................  E-6 SERIES...........................                  149,164                  121,194
                         Block 1 Upgrade Training Kit Cost      .......................                   -5,040
                          Growth.
                         Block 1 Upgrade OSIP Support Funding   .......................                   -3,000
                          Growth.

[[Page 1884]]

 
                         SLEP Installation Delay..............  .......................                   -2,630
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -17,300
47.....................  EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES.........                   43,443                   43,443
48.....................  SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT.............                   14,679                   14,679
49.....................  T-45 SERIES..........................                   61,515                   46,215
                         Engine Surge OSIP Installation         .......................                     -500
                          Funding Ahead of Need.
                         Engine Surge OSIP Contract Delay.....  .......................                   -2,800
                         Required Avionics Modernization        .......................                   -3,900
                          Program Modification Kit Cost Growth.
                         Synthetic Aperture Radar OSIP          .......................                   -8,100
                          Contract Delay.
50.....................  POWER PLANT CHANGES..................                   19,948                   19,948
51.....................  JPATS SERIES.........................                    1,831                    1,831
52.....................  AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS...........                    8,084                    2,984
                         Transfer to RDTE,N line 93 for Common  .......................                   -5,100
                          Mobile Aircrew Restraint System.
53.....................  COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT.................                   21,947                   21,947
54.....................  COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES..............                  101,120                   79,820
                         CNS/ATM Installation Equipment         .......................                  -12,400
                          Contract Savings.
                         CNS/ATM Installation Funding Ahead of  .......................                   -1,400
                          Need.
                         Tactical Moving Map Capability         .......................                   -7,500
                          Modifications Funding Ahead of Need.
56.....................  ID SYSTEMS...........................                   20,397                   20,397
57.....................  RQ-7 SERIES..........................                   18,121                   18,121
58.....................  V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY........                   21,985                   21,985
59.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                1,244,673                1,234,084
                         JPATS Contract Delay.................  .......................                  -10,589
60.....................  COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT..............                  322,063                  322,063
61.....................  AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES.......                   17,998                   17,998
62.....................  WAR CONSUMABLES......................                   25,248                   25,248
63.....................  OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES.............                    7,579                    7,579
64.....................  SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............                   45,916                   45,916
65.....................  FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION.....                    1,752                    1,752
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY....               18,508,613               16,170,868
 
                                            WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
 
1......................  TRIDENT II MODS......................                1,106,911                1,106,911
2......................  MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES........                    3,446                    3,446
3......................  TOMAHAWK.............................                  300,178                  288,278
                         Production Engineering Support Growth  .......................                   -1,900
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                  -10,000
4......................  AMRAAM...............................                  155,553                  145,553
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                  -10,000
5......................  SIDEWINDER...........................                   52,293                   52,293
6......................  JSOW.................................                  131,141                  129,641
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,500
7......................  STANDARD MISSILE.....................                  295,922                  248,222
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -5,700
                         Smooth Production Ramp--SM 6.........  .......................                  -42,000
8......................  RAM..................................                   74,976                   68,046
                         Contract Savings.....................  .......................                   -1,930
                         Program Rebaselined--Milestone C Slip  .......................                   -5,000
                          for Block II.
9......................  HELLFIRE.............................                   43,495                   41,995
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,500
10.....................  AERIAL TARGETS.......................                   43,988                   42,888
                         ECM/Emitter Equipment Cost Growth....  .......................                   -1,100
11.....................  OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT................                    3,981                    3,981
12.....................  ESSM.................................                   48,152                   45,515
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -2,637
13.....................  HARM MODS............................                   53,543                   52,191
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,352
14.....................  STANDARD MISSILES MODS...............                   61,896                   61,896
15.....................  WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES........                    3,281                    3,281
16.....................  FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON.......                  505,734                  505,734
18.....................  ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........                   52,152                   52,152
19.....................  ASW TARGETS..........................                   10,123                    5,197
                         Contract Delay.......................  .......................                   -4,926
20.....................  MK-46 TORPEDO MODS...................                   42,144                   42,144
21.....................  MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS.............                   43,559                   29,859
                         Contract Delay - Funds for 15 kits     .......................                  -13,700
                          and NRE.
22.....................  QUICKSTRIKE MINE.....................                    6,090                    6,090
23.....................  TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............                   43,766                   43,766
24.....................  ASW RANGE SUPPORT....................                    9,557                    9,557
25.....................  FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION.....                    3,494                    3,494
26.....................  SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS...............                   14,316                   14,316
27.....................  CIWS MODS............................                   41,408                   29,022
                         Block 1B Systems Ahead of Need.......  .......................                  -12,386
28.....................  COAST GUARD WEAPONS..................                   20,657                   13,259
                         CIWS Ahead of Need...................  .......................                   -5,698
                         MK160 Ahead of Need..................  .......................                   -1,700
29.....................  GUN MOUNT MODS.......................                   43,991                   40,791
                         Installation Funding Ahead of Need...  .......................                   -3,200
30.....................  LCS MODULE WEAPONS...................                    9,808                        0
                         NLOS Program Termination.............  .......................                   -9,808
31.....................  CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS........                   52,426                   50,626
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,800
32.....................  AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS.                   23,007                   23,007
35.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                   58,806                   58,806
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY.....                3,359,794                3,221,957
 
                                    PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS
 
1......................  GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS................                   80,028                   77,928
                         Direct Attack Moving Target            .......................                   -2,100
                          Capability Program Cost Growth.
3......................  AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES..........                   38,721                   23,171
                         MK 66 Rocket Motor (Mod 4) Unit Cost   .......................                   -6,000
                          Efficiencies.
                         2.75'' Launcher Unit Cost              .......................                   -9,550
                          Efficiencies.
4......................  MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION...............                   21,003                   21,003
5......................  PRACTICE BOMBS.......................                   33,666                   31,666
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -2,000
6......................  CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES...                   53,667                   52,167
                         Program Execution Delays.............  .......................                   -1,500
7......................  AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES.......                   59,626                   59,626
8......................  JATOS................................                    2,869                    2,869
9......................  5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION.............                   34,492                   33,492
                         Product Improvement Growth...........  .......................                   -1,000
10.....................  INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION..                   37,234                   37,234
11.....................  OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION............                   36,275                   36,275
12.....................  SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO......                   46,192                   46,192
13.....................  PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION...........                   11,310                   10,079
                         MK-62 Firing Device Contract Delay...  .......................                   -1,231
14.....................  AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION......                    4,105                    4,105
15.....................  SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION................                   64,839                   64,839

[[Page 1885]]

 
16.....................  LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES............                   15,329                   15,329
17.....................  40 MM, ALL TYPES.....................                   62,835                   62,835
18.....................  60MM, ALL TYPES......................                   17,877                   17,877
19.....................  81MM, ALL TYPES......................                   41,053                   41,053
20.....................  120MM, ALL TYPES.....................                    6,458                    6,458
21.....................  CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES..................                    2,937                    2,937
22.....................  GRENADES, ALL TYPES..................                    9,298                    8,092
                         Funded Ahead of Need for Scorpion....  .......................                   -1,206
23.....................  ROCKETS, ALL TYPES...................                   13,995                   13,995
24.....................  ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES.................                   70,423                   67,546
                         Decrease to Reduce Backlog in MACS     .......................                   -2,877
                          M232 Production.
25.....................  DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES......                   19,464                   19,464
26.....................  FUZE, ALL TYPES......................                   18,032                   18,032
27.....................  NON LETHALS..........................                    3,009                    3,009
28.....................  AMMO MODERNIZATION...................                    8,985                    8,985
29.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                    4,269                    4,269
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY &                     817,991                  790,527
                          MARINE CORPS.
 
                                         SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY
 
1......................  CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM..........                1,731,256                1,721,969
                         Consolidated Afloat Navy Enterprise    .......................                   -2,600
                          System Increment 1.
                         Surface Electronic Warfare             .......................                   -4,900
                          Improvement.
                         AN/UPX-29............................  .......................                   -1,787
2......................  CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (AP-CY)..                  908,313                  908,313
3......................  VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE.............                3,441,452                3,430,343
                         Sonar System Hardware Cost Growth....  .......................                   -5,795
                         Modular Mast Cost Growth.............  .......................                   -1,430
                         Propulsor Cost Growth................  .......................                   -3,884
4......................  VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP-CY).....                1,691,236                1,691,236
5......................  CVN REFUELING OVERHAUL...............                1,255,799                1,248,999
                         SSDS Program Management Excess.......  .......................                   -1,800
                         SSDS Software Growth.................  .......................                   -2,000
                         CEC Testing and Evaluation Excess....  .......................                   -3,000
6......................  CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS (AP-CY)......                  408,037                  408,037
9......................  DDG 1000.............................                  186,312                   77,512
                         Volume Search Radar..................  .......................                 -108,800
10.....................  DDG-51...............................                2,922,190                2,868,454
                         MK-12 IFF Cost Growth................  .......................                   -4,986
                         CIWS Block 1B Cost Growth............  .......................                   -2,256
                         Exterior Communication System Cost     .......................                   -6,294
                          Growth.
                         Main Reduction Gear Systems            .......................                  -10,200
                          Engineering Growth.
                         Main Reduction Gear Contract Savings.  .......................                  -30,000
11.....................  DDG-51 (AP-CY).......................                   47,984                   47,984
12.....................  LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.................                1,230,984                1,168,984
                         Cost Savings.........................  .......................                  -62,000
13.....................  LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (AP-CY).........                  278,351                  190,351
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                  -88,000
16.....................  LHA REPLACEMENT (AP-CY)..............                  949,897                  942,837
                         C4ISR Cost Growth....................  .......................                   -5,174
                         Rolling Airframe Missile System Cost   .......................                   -1,886
                          Growth.
18.....................  INTRATHEATER CONNECTOR...............                  180,703                  180,703
19.....................  OCEANOGRAPHIC SHIPS..................                   88,561                   88,561
20.....................  OUTFITTING...........................                  306,640                  295,570
                         JHSV-1 Outfitting Funding Phasing....  .......................                   -3,426
                         LPD-25 Outfitting Funding Phasing....  .......................                   -2,500
                         DDG-1000 Post-Delivery Phasing.......  .......................                   -1,757
                         LPD-23 Post-Delivery Phasing.........  .......................                   -3,387
21.....................  SERVICE CRAFT........................                   13,770                   13,770
22.....................  LCAC SLEP............................                   83,035                   83,035
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION,                   15,724,520               15,366,658
                          NAVY.
 
                                             OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
 
1......................  LM-2500 GAS TURBINE..................                   12,137                   10,525
                         Turbine Digital Fuel Controls Cost     .......................                   -1,612
                          Growth.
2......................  ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE.............                   14,923                   14,923
4......................  OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT...........                   23,167                   23,167
5......................  SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP.......                   85,619                   73,559
                         AN/BVS-1 Mast Tech Insertion Spares..  .......................                   -1,849
                         ISIS Tech Insertion Kits Ahead of      .......................                   -2,769
                          Need.
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,700
                         Contractor Repair Funding Growth.....  .......................                   -5,742
6......................  DDG MOD..............................                  296,691                  289,691
                         Multi-Mission BMD Capability Upgrade   .......................                   -1,000
                          Kits Cost Growth.
                         Engineering Services Unjustified Cost  .......................                   -6,000
                          Growth.
7......................  FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT...............                   11,974                    9,304
                         Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus     .......................                   -1,570
                          Kits Excess to Requirements.
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,100
8......................  COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD......                    3,962                    2,362
                         Unjustified Request..................  .......................                   -1,600
9......................  POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT..........                   25,614                   25,614
10.....................  SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........                    7,730                    7,730
11.....................  VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.....                  132,039                  130,039
                         Spare Main Propulsion Shaft Ahead of   .......................                   -2,000
                          Need.
12.....................  SUBMARINE BATTERIES..................                   44,057                   31,057
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,500
                         Excess Installation Funding..........  .......................                  -11,500
13.....................  STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP.....                   22,811                   22,811
14.....................  DSSP EQUIPMENT.......................                    3,869                    3,869
15.....................  CG-MODERNIZATION.....................                  356,958                  350,958
                         Engineering Services Unjustified Cost  .......................                   -6,000
                          Growth.
16.....................  LCAC.................................                    9,142                    2,642
                         Personnel Transport Module Contract    .......................                   -6,500
                          Delay.
18.....................  UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS..............                   15,908                   15,908
19.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                  126,842                  119,698
                         LCS Waterjets Spares Ahead of Need...  .......................                   -5,296
                         Voltage Regulators Ahead of Need.....  .......................                   -1,848
20.....................  CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS...........                    7,470                    7,470
21.....................  SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM........                   13,016                   13,016
22.....................  REACTOR POWER UNITS..................                  438,503                  438,503
23.....................  REACTOR COMPONENTS...................                  266,469                  266,469
24.....................  DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT.........                   10,227                   10,227
25.....................  STANDARD BOATS.......................                   27,725                   49,225
                         Range Support Craft..................  .......................                  +21,500
26.....................  OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT.......                   16,094                   16,094
27.....................  OPERATING FORCES IPE.................                   49,856                   91,476
                         Program Increase - Shipyard Capital    .......................                  +41,620
                          Investment Program.
28.....................  NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS..................                  116,829                  116,829
29.....................  LCS MODULES..........................                   82,951                   41,369

[[Page 1886]]

 
                         MCM Module Production Support Growth.  .......................                   -6,000
                         Consulting Services Growth...........  .......................                   -3,064
                         Excess Remote Multi-Mission Vehicle    .......................                   -7,600
                          Funding.
                         Mission Package Computer Environment   .......................                   -2,268
                          Units Ahead of Need.
                         AN/AQS-20A - Ahead of Need...........  .......................                  -22,650
30.....................  LSD MIDLIFE..........................                  106,612                  102,612
                         60-ton Deck Crane Contract Delay.....  .......................                   -1,000
                         Boat Davit and Ballast Control System  .......................                   -3,000
                          Installations Ahead of Need.
31.....................  RADAR SUPPORT........................                   12,030                    7,000
                         Periscope Detection Radar              .......................                   -3,500
                          Installation Funding Ahead of Need.
                         Excess Miscellaneous Funding.........  .......................                   -1,530
32.....................  SPQ-9B RADAR.........................                    8,887                    5,687
                         Excess Antenna Funding...............  .......................                   -2,200
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,000
33.....................  AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM.....                   87,219                   85,219
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -2,000
34.....................  SSN ACOUSTICS........................                  237,015                  234,015
                         Installation Costs Unjustified Growth  .......................                   -3,000
35.....................  UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...                   29,641                   27,241
                         Common Data Link Modification          .......................                   -2,400
                          Installation Funding Ahead of Need.
36.....................  SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS.......                   14,056                   13,056
                         TR-317 Module Cost Growth............  .......................                   -1,000
37.....................  SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM....                   20,739                   18,539
                         Next Generation Countermeasure         .......................                   -2,200
                          Funding Ahead of Need.
38.....................  SSTD.................................                    2,206                        0
                         AN/SLQ-25D Ahead of Need.............  .......................                   -2,206
39.....................  FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM............                   57,481                   57,481
40.....................  SURTASS..............................                    8,468                    8,468
41.....................  TACTICAL SUPPORT CENTER..............                   18,586                   18,586
42.....................  AN/SLQ-32............................                   49,677                   23,257
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -2,000
                         Block 1B3 Incremental Funding........  .......................                   -7,520
                         Block 2 Incremental Funding..........  .......................                  -16,900
43.....................  SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT.................                  105,624                  105,624
44.....................  AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)                    1,299                    1,299
45.....................  SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG.....                   71,558                   70,108
                         ESM Capability Insertion (CI-06) Kits  .......................                   -1,450
                          Ahead of Need.
46.....................  COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY....                   31,091                   25,691
                         Planar Antenna Funding Ahead of Need.  .......................                   -5,400
47.....................  TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS).....                      338                      338
48.....................  NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM                   33,358                   33,358
                          (NTCSS).
49.....................  ATDLS................................                    2,273                    2,273
50.....................  NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM                          8,920                    8,920
                          (NCCS).
51.....................  MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT......                   81,441                   60,710
                         Remote Minehunting System (RMS)......  .......................                   -5,027
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -2,272
                         Expendable Mine Neutralization System  .......................                  -12,432
                          Funding Ahead of Need.
                         Assessment and Identification of Mine  .......................                   -1,000
                          Susceptibility Growth.
52.....................  SHALLOW WATER MCM....................                    9,236                    1,261
                         Cobra Block 1 Contract Delay.........  .......................                   -7,975
53.....................  NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)........                    9,319                    9,319
54.....................  ARMED FORCES RADIO AND TV............                    3,328                    3,328
55.....................  STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP.....                    4,248                    4,248
56.....................  OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT.............                   29,061                   27,761
                         COTS Obsolescence Growth.............  .......................                   -1,300
57.....................  MATCALS..............................                   16,747                   14,747
                         ASPARCS Cost Growth..................  .......................                   -2,000
58.....................  SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL........                    7,658                    7,658
59.....................  AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM.....                   15,169                   10,782
                         AN/SPN-46 Radar Modification Kits      .......................                   -4,387
                          Ahead of Need.
60.....................  NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM............                   17,531                   17,531
61.....................  AIR STATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........                    6,851                    6,851
62.....................  MICROWAVE LANDING SYSTEM.............                    8,551                    8,551
63.....................  ID SYSTEMS...........................                   29,572                   23,122
                         AN/URN-25 TACAN Upgrade Kits Ahead of  .......................                   -2,450
                          Need.
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -4,000
64.....................  TAC A/C MISSION PLANNING SYS(TAMPS)..                    9,098                    7,798
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,300
65.....................  DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT....                    8,542                    8,542
66.....................  TADIX-B..............................                    6,909                    2,944
                         AN/USC-151 Upgrade Kit Ahead of Need.  .......................                   -3,965
67.....................  GCCS-M EQUIPMENT TACTICAL/MOBILE.....                    9,832                    9,832
68.....................  DCGS-N...............................                   16,634                   16,634
69.....................  CANES................................                   34,398                   10,264
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -24,134
70.....................  RADIAC...............................                    6,104                    5,197
                         Air Particulate Detector Contract      .......................                     -907
                          Delay.
71.....................  CANES-INTELL.........................                   10,432                    3,140
                         Ahead of Need........................  .......................                   -7,292
72.....................  GPETE................................                    5,861                    5,861
73.....................  INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY....                    4,445                    4,445
74.....................  EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION..........                    4,737                    4,737
75.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                   51,048                   29,307
                         SPS-73 Tech Refresh/Obsolescence       .......................                     -741
                          Growth.
                         SPS-48 ECO and Support Cost Growth...  .......................                   -3,000
                         SPS-48 Upgrade Kits Ahead of Need....  .......................                  -13,600
                         Installation Funding Ahead of Need...  .......................                   -4,400
78.....................  SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION.......                  260,551                  230,174
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,500
                         ISNS Upgrade Kits Installation         .......................                   -9,000
                          Funding Ahead of Need.
                         CENTRIXS Installation Funding Ahead    .......................                   -1,425
                          of Need.
                         SCI Network Installation Funding       .......................                   -2,100
                          Ahead of Need.
                         ADNS Units Ahead of Need.............  .......................                  -16,352
79.....................  MARITIME DOMAIN AWARENESS (MDA)......                    9,250                    7,650
                         CENTRIXS Modification Kit              .......................                   -1,600
                          Installation Funding Ahead of Need.
80.....................  COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M.......                   39,846                   31,169
                         Battle Force Tactical Network Ahead    .......................                   -8,677
                          of Need.
82.....................  SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT....                   59,013                   55,737
                         Common Submarine Radio Room            .......................                   -1,029
                          Modification Kit Cost Growth.
                         CSSR Seawolf Ahead of Need...........  .......................                   -2,247
83.....................  SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.....                   28,665                   28,665
84.....................  NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)........                  161,021                  161,021
85.....................  JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT.........                    2,256                    2,256
86.....................  ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS.............                    1,309                    1,309
87.....................  NAVAL SHORE COMMUNICATIONS...........                    3,422                    3,422
88.....................  INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP).                  120,529                  114,357
                         SV-21 Unit Cost Growth...............  .......................                   -1,672
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -2,000
                         CND Increment 2 Ahead of Need........  .......................                   -2,500
89.....................  CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP.....                   18,322                   18,322

[[Page 1887]]

 
90.....................  COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT................                   20,189                   20,189
92.....................  SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES.................                   87,846                   83,846
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -4,000
93.....................  WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT......                   51,742                   59,700
                         East Coast USWTR Support Funding       .......................                   -3,500
                          Carryover.
                         East Coast USWTR Ahead of Need.......  .......................                   -8,542
                         Training Range Upgrades..............  .......................                  +20,000
94.....................  EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS..............                    8,429                    8,429
95.....................  AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT..........                   11,134                   11,134
96.....................  AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT.                   37,063                   28,881
                         Advanced Recovery Control and          .......................                   -1,782
                          Aviation Data Management and Control
                          Systems Cost Growth.
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -1,400
                         Production Engineering Unjustified     .......................                   -5,000
                          Cost Growth.
97.....................  METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT.............                   25,581                   25,581
98.....................  OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT.........                    1,573                    1,573
99.....................  AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT................                   40,696                   24,796
                         JHMCS Ahead of Need..................  .......................                  -15,900
100....................  AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES........                   35,855                   35,855
101....................  LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT.....                   20,662                   16,382
                         Units Ahead of Need..................  .......................                   -4,280
102....................  PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS.                   12,812                   10,612
                         Production Support Growth............  .......................                   -2,200
103....................  OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.....                   12,018                   12,018
104....................  NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM...........                    1,086                    1,086
105....................  GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT...........                    8,076                    8,076
106....................  NATO SEASPARROW......................                   11,121                   10,161
                         ECP and Production Support Growth....  .......................                     -960
107....................  RAM GMLS.............................                   11,805                    6,800
                         GMLS Ordalts Contract Delay..........  .......................                   -5,005
108....................  SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM.............                   54,290                   45,902
                         Ship Self Defense System Modification  .......................                   -8,388
                          Kits Ahead of Need.
109....................  AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..............                  162,307                   82,307
                         COTS Tech Refresh Growth.............  .......................                   -3,000
                         Ship Change Documentation Growth.....  .......................                   -4,500
                         Navy Requested Transfer to RDTE,DW     .......................                  -72,500
                          line 84 for Ballistic Missile
                          Defense.
110....................  TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........                   88,698                   88,698
111....................  VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS..............                    5,698                    5,698
112....................  STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP......                  184,034                  159,034
                         Fire Control Tech Refresh Growth.....  .......................                   -5,000
                         Contract Delays......................  .......................                  -20,000
113....................  SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS...........                   88,004                   77,390
                         TI-04 Modification Contract Savings..  .......................                   -2,214
                         Excess TI-04 and Out Modification      .......................                   -8,400
                          Installation Funding.
114....................  SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT......                    5,282                    5,282
115....................  SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........                    8,323                    8,323
116....................  ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........                    7,121                    7,121
117....................  EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP....                   58,288                   58,288
118....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                    3,546                    2,480
                         Industrial Facilities Contract Delay.  .......................                   -1,066
119....................  ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM.......                   36,588                   36,588
120....................  SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS.........                    7,337                    7,337
121....................  SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS.......                   34,519                   34,519
122....................  PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES..........                    3,719                    3,719
123....................  GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS...............                      584                      584
124....................  CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP.....                   13,935                   10,435
                         Contract Delays......................  .......................                   -3,500
125....................  FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT..............                   12,853                   12,853
126....................  TACTICAL VEHICLES....................                   31,741                   25,241
                         FMTV Contract Savings................  .......................                   -2,300
                         Energy Initiative Unjustified          .......................                   -4,200
                          Requirement.
127....................  AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT.................                    3,132                    3,132
128....................  POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT..........                    5,154                    5,154
129....................  ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION...............                   24,770                   24,770
130....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES...........                    1,128                    1,128
131....................  MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT.........                   15,504                   14,030
                         General Purpose Forklift Cost Growth.  .......................                   -1,474
132....................  OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.......                    6,655                    6,655
133....................  FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION.....                    6,315                    6,315
134....................  SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS.......                   66,549                   66,549
135....................  TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........                   11,429                   11,429
137....................  COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............                   47,306                   37,840
                         BUPERS Software Cost Growth..........  .......................                   -2,500
                         SPAWAR Hardware Items Cost Growth....  .......................                   -1,080
                         ERP Kits Cost Growth.................  .......................                     -900
                         JFCOM National Small Unit Center.....  .......................                   -3,075
                         Future Pay and Personnel System Ahead  .......................                   -1,911
                          of Need.
138....................  EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........                    2,067                    2,067
139....................  MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............                    7,679                    5,679
                         Fleet Allowance List Outfitting Cost   .......................                   -2,000
                          Growth.
141....................  NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........                    1,433                    1,433
143....................  OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...                   12,754                   12,754
144....................  C4ISR EQUIPMENT......................                    5,317                    5,317
145....................  ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT......                   20,033                   20,033
146....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT..........                  154,805                  141,475
                         Shipboard Protection System            .......................                   -5,500
                          Installation Costs Excess to Need.
                         Shipboard Protection System Support    .......................                   -6,000
                          Cost Growth.
                         Biometrics Ahead of Need.............  .......................                   -1,830
XX.....................  PROCUREMENT INNOVATION...............  .......................                   15,000
                         Procurement Innovation...............  .......................                  +15,000
147....................  ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY....                  377,353                  159,653
                         Navy Requested Transfer to OM,N AGSAG  .......................                 -217,700
                          BSIT for NGEN.
149....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                  215,906                  215,906
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                   19,767                   19,767
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY.......                6,450,208                5,804,963
 
                                            PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
 
1......................  AAV7A1 PIP...........................                    7,749                    7,749
2......................  LAV PIP..............................                   41,277                   41,277
4......................  EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM....                    9,723                    9,723
5......................  155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER.....                   10,356                   10,356
6......................  HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM                   22,230                   22,230
7......................  WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5                    26,091                   26,091
                          MILLION.
9......................  MODIFICATION KITS....................                   40,916                   30,559
                         Unexecutable Program--M1A1             .......................                  -10,357
                          Survivability Kits.
10.....................  WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM..........                   13,115                   13,115
11.....................  GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE.............                    5,175                    3,855
                         Program Adjustment...................  .......................                   -1,320
13.....................  FOLLOW ON TO SMAW....................                   21,570                   21,570
14.....................  ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-                  20,315                   20,315
                          H).

[[Page 1888]]

 
15.....................  MODIFICATION KITS....................                    3,798                    3,798
16.....................  COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER.............                   10,776                   10,776
17.....................  REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT............                   25,636                   25,636
18.....................  COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM................                   32,877                   32,877
20.....................  ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC).                    3,405                    3,405
21.....................  AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS............                   67,568                   67,568
22.....................  RADAR SYSTEMS........................                      860                      860
23.....................  FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM..................                    3,906                    3,906
24.....................  INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.......                   92,377                   92,377
25.....................  RQ-11 UAV............................                   32,490                   16,490
                         Program Delay--Tier 2 UAS............  .......................                  -16,000
26.....................  DCGS-MC..............................                    4,582                        0
                         DCGS-MC Program Delay................  .......................                   -4,582
28.....................  COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES............                  258,947                  218,947
                         Unjustified Request--MC Intranet.....  .......................                  -40,000
29.....................  COMMAND POST SYSTEMS.................                   33,021                   33,021
30.....................  RADIO SYSTEMS........................                   40,551                   20,051
                         Program Delay--JTRS handheld.........  .......................                  -20,500
31.....................  COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS.....                   32,279                   22,279
                         Execution Delay--WNS-T...............  .......................                  -10,000
32.....................  COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT...                   15,278                   15,278
33.....................  COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES........                    1,157                    1,157
34.....................  COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES............                   12,696                   12,696
35.....................  5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)...............                    4,849                        0
                         Service Requested Reduction..........  .......................                   -4,849
36.....................  MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS........                    5,253                    5,253
37.....................  MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT..                   11,721                   11,721
38.....................  LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT.                  133,827                  133,827
39.....................  FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS..........                   19,156                   19,156
40.....................  TRAILERS.............................                    8,075                    8,075
41.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                    6,016                    6,016
42.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT...                    5,110                    5,110
43.....................  BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT................                   10,743                   10,743
44.....................  TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS................                   29,330                   29,330
45.....................  POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED.............                   19,419                   19,419
46.....................  AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.........                   11,718                   11,718
47.....................  EOD SYSTEMS..........................                   64,093                   64,093
48.....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT..........                   16,419                   16,419
49.....................  GARRISON MOBILE ENGR EQUIP...........                   10,976                   10,976
50.....................  MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP..............                   24,376                   24,376
51.....................  FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION.....                    2,748                    2,748
52.....................  FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT..............                    6,722                    6,722
53.....................  TRAINING DEVICES.....................                    5,668                    5,668
54.....................  CONTAINER FAMILY.....................                      897                      897
55.....................  FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT.....                   18,261                   18,261
57.....................  BRIDGE BOATS.........................                   12,567                   12,567
58.....................  RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN.............                    4,283                    4,283
59.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION...........                    7,572                    7,572
60.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                   13,524                   13,524
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS.....                1,344,044                1,236,436
 
                                         AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
 
1......................  F-35.................................                3,729,242                4,064,442
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from AP,  .......................                  +29,700
                          AF line 43.
                         Production Support Carryover.........  .......................                  -60,000
                         Delete Five Aircraft.................  .......................                 -608,500
                         Transfer Eight Aircraft from STOVL     .......................                  974,000
                          Variant.
2......................  F-35 (AP-CY).........................                  257,000                  257,000
3......................  F-22A................................                  158,039                  158,039
5......................  C-17A (MYP)..........................                   14,283                   48,683
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from AP,  .......................                 +114,400
                          AF line 88.
                         Slow Execution.......................  .......................                  -80,000
6......................  C-130J...............................                  463,267                  455,267
                         Updated Pricing......................  .......................                   -8,000
7......................  C-130J ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)......                   48,000                   40,000
                         Updated Pricing......................  .......................                   -8,000
8......................  HC-130J..............................                  349,300                  307,800
                         Updated Pricing......................  .......................                  -41,500
9......................  HC-130J (AP-CY)......................                   10,000                   10,000
10.....................  MC-130J..............................                  467,465                  415,465
                         Updated Pricing......................  .......................                  -52,000
11.....................  MC-130J (AP-CY)......................                   60,000                   60,000
14.....................  JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT.................                  351,200                  351,200
15.....................  LIGHT MOBILITY AIRCRAFT..............                   65,699                   65,699
16.....................  USAFA POWERED FLIGHT PROGRAM.........                    4,099                    4,099
18.....................  COMM VERT LIFT SPT PLATFORM (UH-1N)..                    6,432                        0
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to RDTE,  .......................                   -6,432
                          AF line 113.
19.....................  V-22 OSPREY..........................                  393,098                  393,098
20.....................  V-22 OSPREY (AP-CY)..................                   13,621                   13,621
24.....................  CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C.................                    2,424                    2,424
25.....................  HH-60M OPERATIONAL LOSS REPLACEMENT..                  104,447                  104,447
27.....................  STUASLO..............................                    3,253                    3,253
28.....................  TARGET DRONES........................                   85,505                   85,505
29.....................  C-37A................................                   52,000                   52,000
30.....................  RQ-4 UAV.............................                  649,629                  503,029
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to AP,    .......................                  -25,600
                          AF line 31.
                         Unjustified Cost Increase, Sensors...  .......................                  -11,000
                         Unjustified Request, Spares..........  .......................                 -110,000
31.....................  RQ-4 UAV (AP-CY).....................                   90,200                   72,300
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from AP,  .......................                  +25,600
                          AF line 30.
                         Air Force Adjustment.................  .......................                  -43,500
32.....................  MC 130 IN BA 04......................                    9,932                        0
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to AC-    .......................                   -9,932
                          130 Recap Program.
xx.....................  AC-130 Recap.........................  .......................                    9,932
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from MC-  .......................                   +9,932
                          130 program.
34.....................  MQ-9.................................                  863,595                  318,131
                         Spares...............................  .......................                 -167,788
                         Support Equipment--Forward Funding...  .......................                  -42,000
                         Production Support--Forward Funding..  .......................                  -98,376
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -21,300
                         Transfer 12 Aircraft to Title IX.....  .......................                 -216,000
35.....................  B-2A.................................                   63,371                   63,371
37.....................  B-1B.................................                  200,090                  200,090
38.....................  B-52.................................                   69,074                   21,074
                         CONECT--Funded Ahead of Need.........  .......................                  -35,000
                         Transfer to RDTE, AF line 117 for      .......................                  -13,000
                          Internal Weapons Bay.
39.....................  A-10.................................                  165,361                  187,361
                         Program Increase--Helmet Mounting      .......................                  +22,000
                          Cueing System.
40.....................  F-15.................................                  302,235                  337,041

[[Page 1889]]

 
                         C/D Flight Data Recorder--Early to     .......................                  -11,408
                          Need.
                         E-model Flight Data Recorder--Early    .......................                  -11,786
                          to Need.
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                   -4,000
                         AESA Radar for ANG F-15Cs............  .......................                  +62,000
41.....................  F-16.................................                  167,188                  167,188
42.....................  F-22A................................                  492,199                  437,739
                         Unjustified Request..................  .......................                  -54,460
43.....................  F-35 MODIFICATIONS...................                  123,936                    4,636
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -82,000
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to AP,    .......................                  -29,700
                          AF line 1.
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to RDTE,  .......................                   -7,600
                          AF line 81 for Auto GCAS.
44.....................  C-5..................................                  740,369                   37,252
                         Block Upgrade--Ahead of Need.........  .......................                  -21,260
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -5,400
                         Transfer C-5 RERP to New AP, AF Line.  .......................                 -676,457
45.....................  C-5 (AP-CY)..........................                  166,900                  106,900
                         Funded with fiscal year 2009 and 2010  .......................                  -60,000
                          funds.
xx.....................  C-5 RERP.............................  .......................                  676,457
                         Transfer C-5 RERP from AP, AF line 44  .......................                 +676,457
46.....................  C-9C.................................                       10                        0
                         Program Terminated...................  .......................                      -10
47.....................  C-17A................................                  351,614                  217,547
                         OBIGGS Kits--Reduction of Four kits..  .......................                  -13,800
                         Extended Range Retrofits Kits--        .......................                   -5,267
                          Reduction of One Kit.
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -98,000
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -17,000
48.....................  C-21.................................                      339                      339
49.....................  C-32A................................                   12,113                   12,113
50.....................  C-37A................................                   12,162                   12,162
51.....................  GLIDER MODS..........................                      120                      120
52.....................  T6...................................                   24,644                   24,644
53.....................  T-1..................................                       83                       83
54.....................  T-38.................................                   28,288                   26,288
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -2,000
56.....................  KC-10A (ATCA)........................                   13,777                   11,777
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -2,000
57.....................  C-12.................................                    7,645                    7,645
58.....................  MC-12W...............................                   10,826                   10,826
59.....................  C-20 MODS............................                      736                      736
60.....................  VC-25A MOD...........................                   13,175                   13,175
61.....................  C-40.................................                   10,697                   10,697
62.....................  C-130................................                  257,339                  296,939
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                  +65,000
                          RDTE, AF line 220 for Avionics
                          Upgrades to Special Mission Aircraft.
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -25,400
63.....................  C-130 MODS INTEL.....................                    3,963                    3,963
64.....................  C130J MODS...........................                   80,205                   64,205
                         Contract Slip--Crashworthy Seats.....  .......................                  -16,000
65.....................  C-135................................                   44,228                   37,428
                         Block 45 Contract Delay..............  .......................                   -8,400
                         Low Cost Modifications...............  .......................                   +1,600
66.....................  COMPASS CALL MODS....................                  176,558                  101,558
                         EC-130 Program Full Funding Violation  .......................                  -75,000
67.....................  DARP.................................                  105,540                  105,540
68.....................  E-3..................................                  195,163                  195,163
69.....................  E-4..................................                   37,526                   37,526
70.....................  E-8..................................                  188,504                    6,397
                         E-8 Reengining--Ahead of Need........  .......................                 -120,407
                         Engine Installs--Ahead of Need.......  .......................                   -5,000
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -56,700
71.....................  H-1..................................                    2,457                    2,457
72.....................  H-60.................................                   11,630                   41,930
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -1,700
                         Simulators and Low Cost Modifications  .......................                  +32,000
73.....................  RQ-4 UAV MODS........................                  119,415                  116,415
                         Unjustified Cost Increase--ASIP        .......................                   -3,000
                          sensors.
74.....................  HC/MC-130 MODIFICATIONS..............                    1,944                    1,944
75.....................  OTHER AIRCRAFT.......................                  159,423                   15,723
                         Transfer FAB-T Funds to RDTE, AF line  .......................                 -119,700
                          180.
                         Delete FAB-T Funds--Early to Need....  .......................                  -24,000
76.....................  MQ-1 MODS............................                  208,213                   20,213
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                 -188,000
77.....................  MQ-9 MODS............................                  108,922                        0
                         Contract Delay--GCS..................  .......................                  -50,884
                         Contract Delay--Reaper Retrofits.....  .......................                  -58,038
78.....................  MQ-9 PAYLOAD--UAS....................                  115,383                        0
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -115,383
79.....................  CV-22 MODS...........................                   13,964                   13,964
80.....................  INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS..........                  622,020                  698,220
                         Unjustified Request--Joint Stars Re-   .......................                  -11,700
                          engining Spares.
                         Program Increase--F-22 Engine Spares.  .......................                 +100,000
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -12,100
81.....................  AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP...                   91,701                   58,301
                         Underexecution.......................  .......................                  -20,000
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -13,400
82.....................  B-1..................................                    6,791                    6,791
83.....................  B-2A.................................                   26,217                   26,217
84.....................  B-52.................................                    3,443                    1,743
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -1,700
85.....................  C-5..................................                      195                      195
87.....................  KC-10A (ATCA)........................                    5,702                    5,702
88.....................  C-17A................................                  153,347                   20,947
                         Air Force Requested Transfer to AP,    .......................                 -114,400
                          AF line 5.
                         Unjustified Funding for Shutdown       .......................                  -18,000
                          Activities.
89.....................  C-130................................                   28,295                   28,295
91.....................  F-15 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT.........                   21,599                   17,599
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                   -4,000
92.....................  F-16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT.........                   17,838                   12,738
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                   -5,100
93.....................  T-6..................................                    9,450                    9,450
94.....................  OTHER AIRCRAFT.......................                   53,953                   53,953
96.....................  INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS..............                   24,619                   24,619
97.....................  WAR CONSUMABLES......................                   92,939                   92,939
98.....................  OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES.............                1,079,742                  912,372
                         Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -6,732
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -160,638
99.....................  OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES--MQ-1.......                   37,500                   37,500
104....................  DARP.................................                   19,117                   19,117
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                   12,981                   12,981
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR                    15,366,508               13,483,739
                          FORCE.
 

[[Page 1890]]

 
                                         MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
 
1......................  MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC.....                   60,647                   60,647
2......................  JASSM................................                  215,825                  215,825
3......................  SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X)..................                   64,523                   64,523
4......................  AMRAAM...............................                  355,358                  348,358
                         Support Funding Carryover............  .......................                   -7,000
5......................  PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE............                   44,570                   44,570
6......................  SMALL DIAMETER BOMB..................                  134,884                  119,884
                         Accounting Error.....................  .......................                  -15,000
7......................  INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POLLUTION                          833                      833
                          PREVENTION.
8......................  ADVANCED CRUISE MISSILE..............                       48                       48
9......................  MM III MODIFICATIONS.................                  123,378                  133,178
                         Air Force Requested Transfer from      .......................                   +9,800
                          RDTE, AF line 175 for MEECN.
10.....................  AGM-65D MAVERICK.....................                      260                      260
11.....................  AGM-88A HARM.........................                    4,079                    4,079
12.....................  AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE............                   10,795                   10,795
13.....................  INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS..........                   43,192                   43,192
14.....................  ADVANCED EHF.........................                   38,078                   38,078
15.....................  ADVANCED EHF (AP-CY).................                  208,520                  208,520
16.....................  WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES........                  517,601                  517,601
17.....................  WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES (AP-CY)                   58,110                   58,110
18.....................  GPS III SPACE SEGMENT................                  122,490                  122,490
19.....................  SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)............                   14,894                   14,894
20.....................  GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)...........                   64,609                   64,609
23.....................  DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG (SPACE)..                   88,719                   88,719
24.....................  EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (SPACE)                1,153,976                1,153,976
26.....................  SBIR HIGH (SPACE)....................                  700,704                  700,704
27.....................  SBIR HIGH (SPACE) (AP-CY)............                  270,000                  270,000
28.....................  NATL POLAR-ORBITING OP ENV SATELLITE.                   26,308                        0
                         Program Termination-Early to Need....  .......................                  -26,308
33.....................  SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS..............                  247,584                  247,584
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                  893,287                  893,287
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE                5,463,272                5,424,764
 
                                      PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
 
1......................  ROCKETS..............................                   19,106                   19,106
2......................  CARTRIDGES...........................                  141,049                  141,049
3......................  PRACTICE BOMBS.......................                   34,094                   23,442
                         BDU-56A/B CDI Program Delay..........  .......................                  -10,652
4......................  GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS................                  183,845                  183,845
5......................  JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION.........                  104,642                  179,361
                         Additional JDAM for War Reserve        .......................                  +74,719
                          Stockpile.
6......................  CAD/PAD..............................                   37,016                   37,016
7......................  EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)....                    3,383                    3,383
8......................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                    1,000                    1,000
9......................  MODIFICATIONS........................                    1,112                    1,112
10.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000...........                    5,015                    5,015
11.....................  FLARES...............................                   72,758                   72,758
12.....................  FUZES................................                   57,337                   57,337
13.....................  SMALL ARMS...........................                    7,063                    7,063
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR                  667,420                  731,487
                          FORCE.
 
                                          OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
 
1......................  PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE...........                   29,207                   29,207
2......................  FAMILY MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE.......                   45,618                   37,618
                         Contract Savings.....................  .......................                   -8,000
3......................  CAP VEHICLES.........................                      902                      902
4......................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (CARGO)..........                   31,773                   31,773
5......................  SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES.......                   52,867                   48,867
                         Up-Armored HMMWV Unjustified Cost      .......................                   -4,000
                          Growth.
6......................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M..................                   18,358                   18,358
7......................  FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES..                   26,924                   26,924
9......................  ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000...........                   14,501                   14,501
10.....................  RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EQUIP.                   25,404                   25,404
11.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M..................                   54,570                   54,570
13.....................  COMSEC EQUIPMENT.....................                  216,381                  180,381
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -36,000
14.....................  MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)...............                    1,582                        0
                         Undefined Requirement................  .......................                   -1,582
15.....................  INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT......                    2,634                    2,634
16.....................  INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP..............                   30,685                   30,685
17.....................  TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANDING..............                    6,517                    6,517
18.....................  NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM.............                  112,056                   88,940
                         Site Activation Ahead of Need........  .......................                  -23,116
19.....................  THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPRO........                   55,326                   55,326
20.....................  WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST.........                   21,018                   18,045
                         OS-21 Contract Delays................  .......................                   -2,973
21.....................  STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL........                   28,164                   28,164
22.....................  CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX............                   18,416                   15,716
                         Contract Delays......................  .......................                   -2,700
23.....................  TAC SIGINT SPT.......................                      377                      377
25.....................  GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.......                   74,285                   74,285
26.....................  AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM...                    9,210                    9,210
27.....................  MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL.........                    8,688                    7,388
                         Contract Delays......................  .......................                   -1,300
28.....................  AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM...                   99,281                   99,281
29.....................  COMBAT TRAINING RANGES...............                   29,637                   49,637
                         Training Range Enhancements..........  .......................                  +20,000
30.....................  C3 COUNTERMEASURES...................                   11,112                   11,112
31.....................  GCSS-AF FOS..........................                   53,349                   31,335
                         ECSS Ahead of Need...................  .......................                  -20,914
                         CMOS Excess to Need..................  .......................                   -1,100
32.....................  THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYS............                   20,525                   20,525
33.....................  AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)..........                   58,284                   38,534
                         Technical Refresh Unjustified Growth.  .......................                  -15,000
                         Recurring Events Unjustified Growth..  .......................                   -4,750
34.....................  INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS........                  101,993                   56,993
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -45,000
35.....................  BASE INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE......                  193,830                  113,830
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -80,000
36.....................  AFNET................................                  151,643                   91,643
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -60,000
37.....................  VOICE SYSTEMS........................                   25,399                   15,399
                         Unjustified Growth...................  .......................                  -10,000
38.....................  USCENTCOM............................                   36,020                   36,020
39.....................  SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PROG SPACE.....                   24,804                   24,804
40.....................  NAVSTAR GPS SPACE....................                    5,279                    5,279

[[Page 1891]]

 
41.....................  NUDET DETECTION SYS (NDS) SPACE......                    5,926                    5,926
42.....................  AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE...                   60,383                   60,383
43.....................  SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE.........                   91,004                   91,004
44.....................  MILSATCOM SPACE......................                  221,545                  190,717
                         FAB-T Early to Need..................  .......................                   -7,538
                         AFWET Modernization Enterprise         .......................                  -23,290
                          Terminal Ahead of Need.
45.....................  SPACE MODS SPACE.....................                   18,384                   18,384
46.....................  COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM..................                   18,801                   18,801
47.....................  TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT...............                  268,140                  242,995
                         JTC Training and Rehearsal System      .......................                  -25,145
                          Ahead of Need.
48.....................  COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER.......                   34,925                   34,925
49.....................  RADIO EQUIPMENT......................                   14,541                    7,041
                         Contract Delays......................  .......................                   -7,500
50.....................  CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT...........                   11,613                   11,613
51.....................  BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE.............                  108,308                  108,308
52.....................  COMM ELECT MODS......................                   74,356                   68,538
                         ILS Ahead of Need....................  .......................                   -2,300
                         BMEWS Ahead of Need..................  .......................                   -2,000
                         OS-21 Contract Delays................  .......................                   -1,518
53.....................  NIGHT VISION GOGGLES.................                   20,873                   14,573
                         Night Vision Cueing and Display        .......................                   -6,300
                          Contract Delays.
54.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY)..                   14,292                   14,292
55.....................  MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING.........                   12,853                   12,853
56.....................  BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT..............                    4,788                    4,788
57.....................  CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS...............                   28,390                   27,190
                         Rapid Airfield Damage Assessment       .......................                   -1,200
                          System Ahead of Need.
58.....................  PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT......                    1,879                    1,879
59.....................  MOBILITY EQUIPMENT...................                   38,558                   38,558
60.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE SUPPORT)...                    4,989                    4,989
62.....................  DARP RC135...........................                   23,296                   23,296
63.....................  DISTRIBUTED GROUND SYSTEMS...........                  271,015                  264,015
                         Program Reduction....................  .......................                   -7,000
65.....................  SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM...............                  489,680                  439,680
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                  -50,000
66.....................  DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM.                   32,668                   32,668
XX.....................  PROCUREMENT INNOVATION...............  .......................                   15,000
                         Procurement Innovation...............  .......................                  +15,000
70.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                   19,046                   19,046
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................               14,258,508               14,396,445
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                 +137,937
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE..               17,845,380               17,568,091
 
                                            PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
 
1......................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, BTA.................                    4,000                    4,000
2......................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCCA, ITEMS LESS                        1,477                    1,477
                          THAN $5M.
3......................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA................                    2,052                    2,052
4......................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA, PERSONNEL                        32,263                   32,263
                          ADMINISTRATION.
17.....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY.........                   14,625                   14,625
18.....................  GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS.......                    5,275                    5,275
19.....................  GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM.........                    2,803                    2,803
20.....................  TELEPORT PROGRAM.....................                   78,227                   78,227
21.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5M..................                  153,288                  153,288
22.....................  NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES                          4,391                    4,391
                          (NCES).
23.....................  DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK..                   86,206                   86,206
24.....................  PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE............                    1,710                    1,710
27.....................  CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............                   22,493                   22,493
28.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA.................                    4,846                    4,846
29.....................  COST.................................                   10,478                   10,478
30.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA, AUTOMATION/                      1,451                    1,451
                          EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS.
31.....................  VEHICLES.............................                       50                       50
32.....................  OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT................                   12,007                   12,007
34.....................  TERMINAL HIGH ALTITUDE AREA DEFENSE                    858,870                  586,870
                          FIELDING.
                         Production Delay Due to Investigation  .......................                 -272,000
                          of Failed Safety Component.
35.....................  AEGIS FIELDING.......................                   94,080                   94,080
35A....................  ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS.........                        0                  205,000
                         Iron Dome Program....................  .......................                 +205,000
45.....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM                     2,546                    2,546
                          (ISSP).
50.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD.................                  124,050                  124,050
51.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE........                   20,138                   20,138
53.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS.................                   11,526                   11,526
54.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS.................                   27,179                   27,179
55.....................  SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND                            79,840                   79,840
                          SUSTAINMENT.
55A....................  MH-47G...............................                        0                  100,449
                         SOCOM Requested Transfer from P,DW     .......................                 +100,449
                          line 56.
56.....................  MH-47 SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM.                  107,934                    7,485
                         SOCOM Requested Transfer to P,DW line  .......................                 -100,449
                          55A.
57.....................  MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION PROGRAM......                  179,375                  137,875
                         SOCOM Requested Transfer to RDTE,DW    .......................                  -25,100
                          line 268.
                         Quantity Reduction Due to Program      .......................                  -16,400
                          Delay.
58.....................  NON-STANDARD AVIATION................                  179,949                   58,681
                         Medium NSAV - Transfer to Title IX...  .......................                 -121,268
60.....................  SOF TANKER RECAPITALIZATION..........                   19,996                    4,996
                         Contract Delays......................  .......................                  -15,000
61.....................  SOF U-28.............................                      404                      404
62.....................  RQ-11 UAV............................                    2,090                    2,090
63.....................  CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION...............                  124,035                  124,035
64.....................  MQ-1 UAV.............................                    1,948                    1,948
65.....................  MQ-9 UAV.............................                    1,965                    1,965
66.....................  STUASLO..............................                   12,148                   12,148
67.....................  C-130 MODIFICATIONS..................                   22,500                    9,261
                         Low Cost Modifications - Execution...  .......................                   -7,039
                         Aircrew Situational Awareness System.  .......................                   -6,200
68.....................  AIRCRAFT SUPPORT.....................                      489                      489
69X....................  PROCUREMENT INNOVATION...............                        0                   15,000
                         Procurement Innovation...............  .......................                  +15,000
70.....................  MK VIII MOD 1 - SEAL DELIVERY VEH....                      823                      823
71.....................  SOF ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT...........                   79,608                   79,608
72.....................  SOF ORDNANCE ACQUISITION.............                   24,215                   24,215
73.....................  COMM EQUIPMENT & ELECTRONICS.........                   58,390                   44,390
                         SOF Deployable Node Delays Due to      .......................                  -14,000
                          Protests.
74.....................  SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.............                   75,892                   81,092
                         Program Increase - Unfunded            .......................                   +5,200
                          Requirement.
75.....................  SMALL ARMS & WEAPONS.................                   30,094                   30,094
76.....................  DCGS-SOF.............................                    5,225                    5,225
77.....................  MARITIME EQUIPMENT MODS..............                      206                      206
79.....................  SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS..........                   11,706                    8,306
                         Unvalidated Requirement - Large SFA    .......................                   -3,400
                          Craft.
80.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS..............                      977                      977
81.....................  TACTICAL VEHICLES....................                   30,965                   33,365

[[Page 1892]]

 
                         Program Increase - AFSOC Unfunded      .......................                   +2,400
                          Requirement.
82.....................  MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATIONS                       28,354                   18,354
                          SYSTEMS.
                         MH-60M Simulator Modernization         .......................                  -10,000
                          Program.
83.....................  COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS..........                   20,000                   20,000
84.....................  MILCON COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT..........                  102,556                  102,556
88.....................  SOF AUTOMATION SYSTEMS...............                   52,353                   52,353
89.....................  SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE                            9,714                    9,714
                          ACTIVITIES.
90.....................  SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS                            30,900                   30,900
                          INTELLIGENCE.
91.....................  SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL                        221                    5,661
                          SYSTEMS.
                         Program Increase - Unfunded            .......................                   +5,440
                          Requirement.
92.....................  SOF VISUAL AUGMENTATION, LASERS AND                     18,626                   18,626
                          SENSOR SYSTEM.
93.....................  SOF TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS...........                   35,234                   37,554
                         Program Increase - Unfunded            .......................                   +2,320
                          Requirement.
94.....................  SOF MARITIME EQUIPMENT...............                      804                      804
96.....................  MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT..............                    7,774                    7,774
97.....................  SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS.........                  269,182                  263,182
                         Program Increase - HSAC Unfunded       .......................                   +4,000
                          Requirement.
                         Program Adjustment...................  .......................                  -10,000
98.....................  PSYOP EQUIPMENT......................                   25,266                   25,266
99.....................  INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION........                   90,635                   90,635
100....................  INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION................                   74,686                   74,686
101....................  DECONTAMINATION......................                   21,570                   21,570
102....................  JOINT BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM.....                   19,389                   10,389
                         Reduction for Anthrax Vaccine          .......................                   -9,000
                          Purchased by HHS.
103....................  COLLECTIVE PROTECTION................                   27,542                   27,542
104....................  CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE..............                  136,114                  136,114
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                  682,643                  681,643
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                   -1,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE.....                4,280,368                4,009,321
 
                                             DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT
 
                         GALLIUM NITRIDE X-BAND MONOLITHIC                        2,000                    2,000
                          MICROWAVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS.
                         GALLIUM NITRIDE RADAR AND ELECTRONIC                     8,579                    8,579
                          WARFARE MONOLITHIC MICROWAVE
                          INTEGRATED CIRCUITS.
                         GALLIUM NITRIDE ADVANCED ELECTRONIC                      2,000                    2,000
                          WARFARE MONOLITHIC MICROWAVE
                          INTEGRATED CIRCUITS.
                         BERYLLIUM SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL BASE.....                    6,897                    6,897
                         SPACE................................                      770                      770
                         NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE INDUSTRIAL                       8,500                   10,900
                          AND SUPPLY BASE RISK MITIGATION
                          PROGRAM.
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                   +2,400
                         ALTERNATIVE ENERGY FROM ORGANIC        .......................                    3,200
                          SOURCES.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT........                   28,746                   34,346
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, PROCUREMENT...................              111,189,951              102,121,873
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          R-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY
 
1......................  IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT                         21,780                   21,780
                          RESEARCH.
2......................  DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............                  195,845                  195,845
3......................  UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES......                   91,161                   87,561
  .....................  V72-Transfer to D55..................  .......................                   -3,300
  .....................  D55-Transfer from V72................  .......................                   +3,300
  .....................  V72-Non-Department of Defense funding  .......................                   -3,600
4......................  UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH                        98,087                   98,087
                          CENTERS.
5......................  MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY.................                   29,882                   29,882
6......................  SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY.                   48,929                   48,929
7......................  TRACTOR HIP..........................                   14,624                   14,624
8......................  AVIATION TECHNOLOGY..................                   43,476                   43,476
9......................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY........                   17,330                   17,330
10.....................  MISSILE TECHNOLOGY...................                   49,525                   49,525
11.....................  ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY..........                   18,190                   18,190
12.....................  ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION.....                   20,582                   20,582
13.....................  COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE                           64,740                   64,740
                          TECHNOLOGY.
14.....................  BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY................                   60,342                   60,342
15.....................  CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT                            5,324                   10,924
                          DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY.
  .....................  Emerging Chemical Agent Threat.......  .......................                   +5,600
16.....................  JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM.....                    7,893                    7,893
17.....................  WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY.....                   42,645                   42,645
18.....................  ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES...                   60,859                   60,859
19.....................  NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY..............                   40,228                   40,228
20.....................  COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS..................                   19,118                   19,118
21.....................  HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY.                   21,042                   21,042
22.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY.....                   18,364                   22,364
  .....................  Research, Development and Engineering  .......................                   +4,000
                          Command.
23.....................  COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS                        25,573                   25,573
                          TECHNOLOGY.
24.....................  COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY.....                    6,768                    6,768
25.....................  MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY......                   79,189                   75,184
  .....................  Joint Integrated Base Defense Program  .......................                   -4,005
                          Office transfer to line 60 at
                          request of the Army.
26.....................  MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING                             22,198                   22,198
                          TECHNOLOGY.
27.....................  WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY................                   27,746                   27,746
28.....................  MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY...................                   96,797                   96,797
29.....................  WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.......                   37,364                   37,364
30.....................  MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY..........                   71,510                  115,510
  .....................  Peer-Reviewed Neurotoxin Exposure      .......................                  +20,000
                          Treatment Parkinsons Research
                          Program.
  .....................  Neurofibromatosis Research...........  .......................                  +16,000
  .....................  Military Burn Trauma Research Program  .......................                   +8,000
31.....................  AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.........                   57,454                   57,454
32.....................  WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED                          64,438                   64,438
                          TECHNOLOGY.
33.....................  COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADV                       89,499                  125,819
                          TECHNOLOGY.
  .....................  Alternative Energy...................  .......................                  +36,320
34.....................  COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADV                     8,102                    8,102
                          TECH.
35.....................  MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADV                     7,921                    7,921
                          TECH.
36.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED                             50,359                   50,359
                          TECHNOLOGY.
37.....................  TRACTOR HIKE.........................                    8,015                    8,015
38.....................  NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION                   15,334                   15,334
                          SYSTEMS.
39.....................  TRACTOR ROSE.........................                   12,309                   12,309
41.....................  MILITARY HIV RESEARCH................                    6,688                   26,688
  .....................  HIV Research.........................  .......................                  +20,000
42.....................  COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY                         10,550                   10,550
                          DEVELOPMENT.
43.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY........                   18,350                   18,350
44.....................  MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED                             84,553                   79,053
                          TECHNOLOGY.
  .....................  P 704 excessive growth without         .......................                   -5,500
                          strategy.
45.....................  TRACTOR CAGE.........................                    9,986                    9,986
46.....................  LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED                   26,953                   26,953
                          TECH.
47.....................  JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM.....                    9,151                    9,151

[[Page 1893]]

 
48.....................  NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.....                   39,912                   39,912
49.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMO                   15,878                   15,878
50.....................  MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED                           27,393                   24,393
                          TECHNOLOGY.
  .....................  Program reduction....................  .......................                   -3,000
51.....................  ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE                      24,873                   24,873
                          AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.
53.....................  ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS                            11,455                   11,455
                          INTEGRATION.
54.....................  ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS                            27,551                   27,551
                          INTEGRATION (SPACE).
56.....................  LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER-ADV DEV.                   15,596                   15,596
57.....................  SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING                    2,425                    2,425
                          SYS-ADV DEV.
58.....................  TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION...                   42,183                   37,183
  .....................  AKE 120mm cartridge EMD Phase II       .......................                   -5,000
                          contract award delay.
59.....................  ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS).                  136,302                  207,702
  .....................  S-MOD milestone B delay..............  .......................                  -57,000
  .....................  Stryker DVH..........................  .......................                 +128,400
60.....................  SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY....                   18,556                    8,239
  .....................  Joint Integrated Base Defense Program  .......................                   +4,005
                          Office-Transfer from line 25 at
                          request of the Army.
  .....................  REF funded in Title IX...............  .......................                  -14,322
61.....................  TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE                        17,962                   12,162
                          SYSTEM-AD.
  .....................  Unsustained growth...................  .......................                   -5,800
62.....................  NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED                                0                    5,159
                          DEVELOPMENT.
  .....................  CSP-Transfer from line 177 at request  .......................                   +5,159
                          of the Army.
63.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY.....                    4,695                    4,695
64.....................  WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-                        190,903                  190,903
                          TACTICAL.
65.....................  NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........                    5,060                    5,060
66.....................  AVIATION-ADV DEV.....................                    8,355                    8,355
67.....................  LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT-ADV                    80,490                   65,315
                          DEV.
  .....................  JLTV EMD contract award delay........  .......................                  -15,175
68.....................  COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT CONTROL SYSTEM                   14,290                   14,290
                          EVALUATION.
69.....................  MEDICAL SYSTEMS-ADV DEV..............                   28,132                   28,132
70.....................  SOLDIER SYSTEMS-ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.                   48,323                   48,323
71.....................  INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE.........                      970                      970
72.....................  ENDURANCE UAVS.......................                   93,000                   93,000
73.....................  AIRCRAFT AVIONICS....................                   89,210                   74,210
  .....................  SOSCOE Apache Block III integration    .......................                  -15,000
                          change in requirements.
74.....................  ARMED, DEPLOYABLE OH-58D.............                   72,550                   72,550
75.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT.......                  172,269                  149,755
  .....................  CIRCM test and evaluation funds        .......................                  -22,514
                          requested ahead of need.
76.....................  JOINT TACTICAL RADIO.................                      784                      784
77.....................  ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM...........                   22,574                   18,074
  .....................  EMD contract award delay.............  .......................                   -4,500
78.....................  TRACTOR CAGE.........................                   23,194                   23,194
79.....................  INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS.............                   80,337                   70,337
  .....................  S62 - Milestone B delay..............  .......................                  -10,000
80.....................  MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES.............                    3,710                    3,710
81.....................  SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING                    5,335                    5,335
                          SYS-SDD.
82.....................  JAVELIN..............................                    9,999                        0
  .....................  Lack of acquisition strategy.........  .......................                   -9,999
83.....................  FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES....                    3,519                    3,519
84.....................  AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL..................                    9,892                    9,892
85.....................  LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES......                    1,990                    1,990
86.....................  NON-LINE OF SIGHT LAUNCH SYSTEM......                   81,247                        0
  .....................  Program termination..................  .......................                  -81,247
89.....................  FCS SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS ENGR & PROGRAM                  568,711                  498,711
                          MGMT.
  .....................  Program reduction....................  .......................                  -70,000
90.....................  FCS RECONNAISSANCE (UAV) PLATFORMS...                   50,304                   50,304
91.....................  FCS UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES.........                  249,948                  200,000
  .....................  Program reduction....................  .......................                  -49,948
92.....................  FCS UNATTENDED GROUND SENSORS........                    7,515                    7,515
93.....................  FCS SUSTAINMENT & TRAINING R&D.......                  610,389                  610,389
95.....................  NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS-SDD.............                   52,549                   52,549
96.....................  COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND                            2,118                    2,118
                          EQUIPMENT.
97.....................  NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES-SDD......                   27,756                   27,756
98.....................  AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND                        34,209                   34,209
                          INTELLIGENCE-SDD.
99.....................  CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS                         30,291                   30,291
                          DEVELOPMENT.
100....................  AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT.                   14,041                   14,041
101....................  DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS                    15,547                   15,547
                          (DIS)-SDD.
103....................  COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT)                   27,670                   27,670
                          CORE.
105....................  WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS-SDD............                   24,345                   15,345
  .....................  PGK Increment II EMD delay...........  .......................                   -9,000
106....................  LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT-SDD.                   41,039                   41,039
107....................  COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS                        90,736                   75,736
                          SYSTEMS - SDD.
  .....................  JBC-P unsustained growth.............  .......................                  -15,000
108....................  MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL                     34,474                   34,474
                          DEFENSE EQUIPMENT.
109....................  LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER-SDD.........                   95,577                   49,577
  .....................  Project 016-Scorpion acceleration      .......................                  -16,000
                          funded in prior approval
                          reprogramming.
  .....................  Project 415-ASTAMIDS/GSTAMIDS lack of  .......................                  -30,000
                          acquisition strategy.
110....................  ARTILLERY MUNITIONS..................                   26,371                   26,371
111....................  COMBAT IDENTIFICATION................                   29,884                    3,000
  .....................  Unexecutable request.................  .......................                  -26,884
112....................  ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL                         60,970                   60,970
                          HARDWARE & SOFTWARE.
113....................  GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS                        13,576                   13,576
                          SYSTEM (GFEBS).
114....................  FIREFINDER...........................                   24,736                   24,736
115....................  SOLDIER SYSTEMS--WARRIOR DEM/VAL.....                   20,886                   20,886
116....................  ARTILLERY SYSTEMS....................                   53,624                  103,624
  .....................  Program Increase.....................  .......................                  +20,000
  .....................  Transfer from WTCV,A line 12 for       .......................                  +30,000
                          Paladin PIM.
117....................  PATRIOT/MEADS COMBINED AGGREGATE                       467,139                  467,139
                          PROGRAM.
118....................  NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL MONITORING                          7,276                    7,276
                          SENSOR NETWORK.
119....................  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT...                   23,957                   23,957
120....................  ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN                         100,500                   60,500
                          RESOURCES SYSTEM (A-IMH.
  .....................  Excessive growth without acquisition   .......................                  -40,000
                          strategy.
121....................  JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)...                  130,340                  130,340
122....................  SLAMRAAM.............................                   23,700                   23,700
123....................  PAC-2/MSE MISSILE....................                   62,500                   62,500
124....................  ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE                        251,124                  251,124
                          DEFENSE (AIAMD).
125....................  MANNED GROUND VEHICLE................                  934,366                  461,100
  .....................  Program adjustment...................  .......................                 -473,266
126....................  AERIAL COMMON SENSOR.................                  211,500                  211,500
127....................  TROJAN-RH12..........................                    3,697                    3,697
128....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT.......                   21,571                   13,571
  .....................  EW5-Unsustained growth...............  .......................                   -8,000
129....................  THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT.........                   26,158                   26,158
130....................  TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT...........                    8,614                    8,614
131....................  MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT.................                   42,102                   42,102
132....................  RAND ARROYO CENTER...................                   20,492                   20,492
133....................  ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL.................                  163,788                  163,788
134....................  CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM.....                   17,704                   17,704
136....................  ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES......                  393,937                  412,257
  .....................  Army Test Range Infrastructure         .......................                  +18,320
                          unfunded requirement.
137....................  ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION                     59,040                   67,760
                          AND TARGETS.

[[Page 1894]]

 
  .....................  Test and Evaluation Instrumentation    .......................                   +8,720
                          unfunded requirement.
138....................  SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS.....                   41,812                   43,412
  .....................  Test and Evaluation Instrumentation    .......................                   +1,600
                          unfunded requirement.
139....................  DOD HIGH ENERGY LASER TEST FACILITY..                    4,710                    4,710
140....................  AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION...............                    5,055                    5,055
141....................  METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E                          7,185                    7,185
                          ACTIVITIES.
142....................  MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS............                   18,078                   19,278
  .....................  Test and Evaluation Instrumentation    .......................                   +1,200
                          unfunded requirement.
143....................  EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS........                    5,460                    5,460
144....................  SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING.......                   68,191                   68,191
145....................  ARMY EVALUATION CENTER...............                   61,450                   64,090
  .....................  Test and Evaluation Instrumentation    .......................                   +2,640
                          unfunded requirement.
146....................  SIMULATION & MODELING FOR ACQ, RQTS,                     3,926                    3,926
                          & TNG (SMART).
147....................  PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES...............                   73,685                   73,685
148....................  TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES.....                   48,309                   48,309
149....................  MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION,                              53,338                   44,042
                          EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY.
  .....................  Project 862-155mm HE projectile        .......................                   -9,296
                          underfunded new start.
150....................  ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT                    3,195                    3,195
                          SUPPORT.
151....................  MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH AND                   16,154                   16,154
                          DEVELOPMENT).
153....................  MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.....                   51,619                   25,619
  .....................  GMLRS AW EMD contract award delay....  .......................                  -26,000
154....................  AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE........                  372,493                  372,493
155....................  INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO CYBER (ISC)                      2,360                    2,360
                          MIP.
156....................  ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA                       24,622                   24,622
                          SYSTEM.
157....................  COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS..                  204,481                  204,481
158....................  MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM..............                   25,540                   25,540
159....................  AIRCRAFT MODS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT                      134,999                  124,856
                          PROGRAMS.
  .....................  P430 - Chinook RW crashworthy seating  .......................                  -10,143
                          previously fully funded.
160....................  AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT                      710                      710
                          PROG.
161....................  DIGITIZATION.........................                    6,329                    6,329
162....................  FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND                    3,935                    3,935
                          BELOW (FBCB2).
163....................  MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT                             24,280                   24,280
                          IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
165....................  TRACTOR CARD.........................                   14,870                   14,870
167....................  JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM.........                   12,403                   12,403
168....................  JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV).......                    3,153                    3,153
171....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM.                   54,784                   11,905
  .....................  Protected Information - Biometrics -   .......................                  -42,879
                          Transfer to line 171x.
171x...................  FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS.................                        0                   42,879
  .....................  Protected Information - Biometrics -   .......................                  +42,879
                          Transfer from line 171.
172....................  GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM.........                  125,569                  125,569
173....................  SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)....                   33,694                   33,694
174....................  WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS                   13,024                   13,024
177....................  TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES....                   54,300                   49,141
  .....................  CSP - Transfer of HD IR funds to line  .......................                   -5,159
                          62 at request of the Army for
                          execution.
178....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE                      103,002                  103,002
                          SYSTEMS.
179....................  MQ-1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV...............                  123,156                  123,156
180....................  RQ-11 UAV............................                    1,599                    1,599
181....................  RQ-7 UAV.............................                    7,805                    7,805
183....................  BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE......                   14,114                    2,114
  .....................  Protected Information - Biometrics...  .......................                  -12,000
185....................  END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS                        61,098                   61,098
                          ACTIVITIES.
xx.....................  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION..                        0                  105,000
  .....................  Research and Development Innovation..  .......................                 +105,000
  .....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                    4,447                    4,447
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                10,333,392                9,710,998
                          EVALUATION, ARMY.
 
                                 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY
 
1......................  UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES......                  108,679                  108,679
2......................  IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT                         17,979                   17,979
                          RESEARCH.
3......................  DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............                  429,767                  429,767
4......................  POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH....                   98,150                   98,150
5......................  FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH....                  107,448                  147,448
  .....................  Alternative Energy...................  .......................                  +40,000
6......................  MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY                   43,776                   43,776
8......................  COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH......                   70,168                   70,168
9......................  WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED                         113,724                  113,724
                          RESEARCH.
10.....................  RF SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH..........                   83,902                   83,902
11.....................  OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED                   49,491                   49,491
                          RESEARCH.
12.....................  JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED                         6,002                    6,002
                          RESEARCH.
13.....................  UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH....                   69,186                   69,186
14.....................  MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE                          36,833                   36,833
                          APPLIED RESEARCH.
15.....................  POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.                  117,908                  117,908
16.....................  FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.                   61,877                   61,877
17.....................  COMMON PICTURE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY...                   96,720                   96,720
18.....................  WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT ADVANCED                         98,261                   98,261
                          TECHNOLOGY.
19.....................  ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED                        82,143                   82,143
                          TECHNOLOGY.
20.....................  MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY                       115,089                  115,089
                          DEMONSTRATION (ATD).
21.....................  JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY                     11,131                   11,131
                          DEVELOPMENT.
22.....................  WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED                          18,076                   55,336
                          TECHNOLOGY.
  .....................  C.W Bill Young Bone Marrow Donor       .......................                  +31,500
                          Recruitment and Research Program.
  .....................  Program Increase - Tactical Athlete    .......................                   +5,760
                          Program.
23.....................  UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.                   49,276                   53,276
  .....................  Program Increase - ASW Research......  .......................                   +4,000
24.....................  NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND                        53,177                   53,177
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
25.....................  MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE                          21,941                   21,941
                          ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.
XX.....................  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION..                        0                  105,000
  .....................  Research and Development Innovation..  .......................                 +105,000
26.....................  AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS......                  123,331                  118,331
  .....................  JMAPS program delay..................  .......................                   -5,000
27.....................  AVIATION SURVIVABILITY...............                    9,480                    9,480
28.....................  DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL.                    4,275                    4,275
29.....................  ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT..............                    8,249                    8,249
30.....................  TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE.....                    6,452                    6,452
31.....................  ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY...                    1,658                    1,658
32.....................  SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE                          81,347                   79,247
                          COUNTERMEASURES.
  .....................  Unmanned Surface Sweep System program  .......................                   -2,100
                          delay.
33.....................  SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE.........                   57,796                   50,796
  .....................  Milestone B delay....................  .......................                   -7,000
34.....................  CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT..........                   93,830                   91,830
  .....................  Navy requested transfer to line 49     .......................                   -2,000
                          for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
35.....................  SHIPBOARD SYSTEM COMPONENT                                  51                       51
                          DEVELOPMENT.
36.....................  PILOT FISH...........................                   81,784                   81,784
37.....................  RETRACT LARCH........................                  142,858                  142,858
38.....................  RETRACT JUNIPER......................                  134,497                  134,497
39.....................  RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL.................                    1,358                    1,358
40.....................  SURFACE ASW..........................                   21,673                   21,673
41.....................  ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT                  608,566                  559,266
  .....................  Execution delays.....................  .......................                  -49,300
42.....................  SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS...                    5,590                    5,590

[[Page 1895]]

 
43.....................  SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN.........                   17,883                   17,883
44.....................  SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY                    1,796                    1,796
                          STUDIES.
45.....................  ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS.......                  366,509                  366,509
46.....................  ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS...                    5,459                    5,459
47.....................  CHALK EAGLE..........................                  447,804                  447,804
48.....................  LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)...........                  226,288                  189,588
  .....................  LCS-2 post shakedown availability      .......................                  -15,800
                          delay.
  .....................  LCS-1 post shakedown availability      .......................                     -500
                          planning funding excess.
  .....................  NLOS missile termination.............  .......................                  -15,400
  .....................  Program Increase - Mine Warfare        .......................                   +4,000
                          Testing Disruption.
  .....................  Navy requested transfer to line 49     .......................                   -2,000
                          for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
  .....................  Program Increase - Small Business      .......................                   +8,000
                          Technology Insertion (Mine Warfare
                          Modules).
  .....................  Savings from accelerated DT..........  .......................                  -15,000
49.....................  COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION............                   24,344                   34,344
  .....................  Navy requested transfer from lines     .......................                  +10,000
                          34, 48, 107, 122 and 136 for
                          Automatic Test and Re-Test.
50.....................  CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS...............                    5,388                    5,388
51.....................  MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES........                  242,765                  222,765
  .....................  Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle.......  .......................                 -165,000
  .....................  Termination Liability, or SDD if       .......................                 +145,000
                          certified by the Secretary.
52.....................  MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT                      40,505                   28,505
                          SYSTEM.
  .....................  JLTV EMD contract award delay........  .......................                  -12,000
53.....................  JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE                        25,873                   25,873
                          DEVELOPMENT.
54.....................  COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT...............                   52,282                   52,282
55.....................  OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY                            13,560                   13,560
                          DEVELOPMENT.
56.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.............                   20,207                   20,207
57.....................  NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM..................                   30,403                   34,403
  .....................  Program Increase - Alternative Energy  .......................                   +4,000
                          from Organic Sources.
58.....................  FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT...............                    3,746                    3,746
59.....................  CHALK CORAL..........................                   71,920                   71,920
60.....................  NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY...........                    4,139                    4,139
61.....................  RETRACT MAPLE........................                  219,463                  219,463
62.....................  LINK PLUMERIA........................                   58,030                   58,030
63.....................  RETRACT ELM..........................                  183,187                  183,187
64.....................  SHIP SELF DEFENSE....................                    4,385                    4,385
65.....................  LINK EVERGREEN.......................                   41,433                   41,433
66.....................  SPECIAL PROCESSES....................                   36,457                   36,457
67.....................  NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........                    9,196                    9,196
68.....................  LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY...............                      905                      905
69.....................  NONLETHAL WEAPONS....................                   43,272                   43,272
70.....................  JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING                   159,151                  159,151
                          SYSTEMS.
73.....................  DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON    .......................                    8,000
                          SYSTEMS.
  .....................  Directed Energy Development and Test.  .......................                   +8,000
74.....................  TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED                       51,693                   51,693
                          COUNTERMEASURES.
75.....................  JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED                      56,542                   50,242
                          ELECTRONIC WARFARE.
  .....................  Program delay........................  .......................                   -6,300
76.....................  PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT                    25,121                   25,121
                          PROGRAM.
77.....................  SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW)                        34,793                   34,793
                          ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE.
78.....................  ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT - MIP........                    2,161                    2,161
79.....................  SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS -                     4,253                    4,253
                          MIP.
80.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT - MIP.                      663                      663
81.....................  OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT...............                   44,329                   44,329
82.....................  AV-8B AIRCRAFT - ENG DEV.............                   22,867                   22,867
83.....................  STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT................                   45,667                   45,667
84.....................  MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE                        55,792                   55,792
                          DEVELOPMENT.
85.....................  AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING......                    5,735                    5,735
86.....................  P-3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM............                    3,574                    3,574
87.....................  WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM...............                    3,733                    3,733
88.....................  TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM..............                   89,955                   87,955
  .....................  Systems engineering growth...........  .......................                   -2,000
89.....................  ADVANCED HAWKEYE.....................                  171,132                  171,132
90.....................  H-1 UPGRADES.........................                   60,498                   60,498
91.....................  ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS..............                   64,834                   64,834
92.....................  V-22A................................                   46,070                   44,425
  .....................  Fuel forward funded in fiscal year     .......................                   -1,645
                          2010 supplemental.
93.....................  AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.........                    8,689                   11,189
  .....................  Transfer from AP,N line 52 for Common  .......................                   +2,500
                          Mobile Aircrew Restraint System.
94.....................  EA-18................................                   22,042                   21,773
  .....................  Fuel forward funded in fiscal year     .......................                     -269
                          2010 supplemental.
95.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT.......                   80,819                   80,819
96.....................  VH-71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT....                  159,785                  159,785
97.....................  NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ).........                  120,602                   90,602
  .....................  Technology development contract delay  .......................                  -30,000
98.....................  JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM - NAVY                     687,723                  627,723
                          (JTRS-NAVY).
  .....................  Airborne Maritime Fixed unjustified    .......................                  -60,000
                          increase.
100....................  SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM                        193,933                  193,933
                          ENGINEERING.
101....................  LPD-17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION.....                    1,373                    1,373
102....................  SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)............                   44,091                   24,091
  .....................  Program delay........................  .......................                  -20,000
103....................  STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS........                   96,186                   96,186
104....................  AIRBORNE MCM.........................                   45,885                   45,885
105....................  NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER                   21,517                   21,517
                          AIR SYSTEMS ENG.
106....................  ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS.........                  274,371                  274,371
107....................  SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION....                  118,897                  112,197
  .....................  Navy requested transfer to line 49     .......................                   -2,000
                          for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
  .....................  Communications at Speed and Depth....  .......................                   -4,700
108....................  AIR CONTROL..........................                    5,665                    5,665
109....................  SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS...........                   70,117                   70,117
110....................  COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION.                    5,044                    5,044
111....................  NEW DESIGN SSN.......................                  155,489                  171,489
  .....................  Program Increase - Small Business      .......................                  +16,000
                          Technology Insertion.
112....................  SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM....                   50,537                   50,537
113....................  SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E...                  153,686                  166,686
  .....................  Full Ship Shock Trial Alternative      .......................                  +13,000
                          transfer from line 136.
114....................  NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES.....                    4,443                    4,443
115....................  MINE DEVELOPMENT.....................                    5,455                    5,455
116....................  LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT......                   25,282                   25,282
117....................  JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE                        10,489                   10,489
                          DEVELOPMENT.
118....................  PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND                    10,759                   10,759
                          HUMAN FACTORS.
119....................  JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS........                   12,567                   12,567
120....................  SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL).                   45,930                   45,930
121....................  SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)                    5,860                    5,860
122....................  SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/                   84,525                   82,525
                          EW).
                         Navy requested transfer to line 49     .......................                   -2,000
                          for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
123....................  INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING.............                    6,820                    6,820
124....................  MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT..................                   12,337                   29,137
  .....................  Wound Care Research..................  .......................                  +10,400
  .....................  Military Dental Research.............  .......................                   +6,400
125....................  NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM.................                   66,636                   66,636
126....................  JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)--EMD......                  667,916                  613,864
                         Block IV capabilities funding ahead    .......................                  -29,052
                          of need.

[[Page 1896]]

 
                         Underexecution of test program.......  .......................                  -25,000
127....................  JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)...........                  707,791                  676,806
                         Block IV capabilities funding ahead    .......................                  -29,000
                          of need.
                         Fuel forward funded in fiscal year     .......................                   -1,985
                          2010 supplemental.
128....................  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT...                   22,783                   22,783
129....................  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT...                   28,280                   28,280
130....................  NAVY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN                          27,444                   15,444
                          RESOURCES SYSTEM.
  .....................  Reduction to pre-development           .......................                  -12,000
                          activities.
131....................  CH-53K...............................                  577,435                  577,435
133....................  JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)...                  100,846                  100,846
134....................  MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)                  929,240                  941,240
  .....................  Program Increase--Small Business       .......................                  +12,000
                          Technology Insertion.
136....................  DDG-1000.............................                  549,241                  534,241
                         Navy requested transfer to line 49     .......................                   -2,000
                          for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
                         Full Ship Shock Trial Alternative      .......................                  -13,000
                          transfer to line 113.
137....................  TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM--MIP.........                    1,318                    1,318
138....................  SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION--                      1,415                    1,415
                          MIP.
139....................  TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS.........                   17,019                   12,387
  .....................  Execution delays.....................  .......................                   -4,632
140....................  THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT.........                   18,755                   18,755
141....................  TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT...........                   66,066                   66,066
142....................  MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT.................                   37,522                   37,522
143....................  STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT--NAVY...                    8,149                    8,149
144....................  CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES............                   49,165                   49,165
146....................  TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES.......                      662                      662
147....................  MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL                   58,329                   58,329
                          SUPPORT.
148....................  STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT..........                    3,451                    3,451
149....................  RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY                            72,094                   72,094
                          MANAGEMENT.
150....................  RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT......                   95,332                   93,871
                         Fuel forward funded in fiscal year     .......................                   -1,461
                          2010 supplemental.
151....................  TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT..........                  376,418                  376,418
152....................  OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION                         15,746                   15,746
                          CAPABILITY.
153....................  NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE                        4,013                    4,013
                          (SEW) SUPPORT.
154....................  SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE                         19,700                   19,700
                          SUPPORT.
155....................  MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT....                   17,721                   17,721
156....................  TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES......                    1,859                    1,859
157....................  SERVICE SUPPORT TO JFCOM, JNTC.......                    4,260                    4,260
161....................  UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV)                     266,368                  266,368
                          ADVANCED COMPONENT.
162....................  STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM                          81,184                   71,184
                          SUPPORT.
                         Conventional Trident Modification....  .......................                  -10,000
163....................  SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.....                   34,997                   34,997
164....................  SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE                               6,815                    6,815
                          DEVELOPMENT.
165....................  NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS........                   10,331                   10,331
166....................  RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)....                   35,120                   35,120
167....................  F/A-18 SQUADRONS.....................                  148,438                  148,438
168....................  E-2 SQUADRONS........................                   19,011                   19,011
169....................  FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)..                   26,894                   26,894
170....................  TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION                           10,587                   10,587
                          PLANNING CENTER (TMPC).
171....................  INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM.......                   23,464                   23,464
172....................  AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS....                    4,357                    4,357
173....................  CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS                           50,750                   50,750
                          DEVELOPMENT.
174....................  CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT...........                    1,519                    1,519
175....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS                       39,398                   39,398
                          SUPPORT.
176....................  HARM IMPROVEMENT.....................                   14,207                   12,207
                         Systems engineering growth...........  .......................                   -2,000
177....................  TACTICAL DATA LINKS..................                   28,854                   28,854
178....................  SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION                   32,877                   36,877
  .....................  Program Increase--Small Business       .......................                   +4,000
                          Technology Insertion.
179....................  MK-48 ADCAP..........................                   26,234                   34,234
                         Program Increase--Small Business       .......................                   +8,000
                          Technology Insertion.
180....................  AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS................                  133,611                  100,890
                         F-135 engine ahead of need...........  .......................                  -27,000
                         Multi-purpose bomb rack program delay  .......................                   -5,721
181....................  NAVY SCIENCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM......                    3,535                    3,535
182....................  OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS....                   74,229                   74,229
183....................  MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS..                  245,298                  232,898
                         Joint Cooperative Target               .......................                  -12,400
                          Identification--Ground.
184....................  MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING                  100,424                   76,424
                          ARMS SYSTEMS.
                         Marine personnel carrier program       .......................                  -20,000
                          delay.
                         LAV-AT contract delay................  .......................                   -4,000
185....................  MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT.                   19,466                   19,466
186....................  USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE                    20,316                   20,316
                          SYSTEMS (MIP).
187....................  TACTICAL AIM MISSILES................                      912                      912
188....................  ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR                         2,633                    2,633
                          MISSILE (AMRAAM).
189....................  JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV).......                    3,586                    3,586
194....................  SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE).....                  422,268                  422,268
195....................  CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK                             63,563                   44,563
                          ENTERPRISE SERVICES.
                         Increment 1 transition contract delay  .......................                  -19,000
196....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM.                   25,934                   25,934
199....................  CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK                              8,375                    8,375
                          ENTERPRISE SERVICES--MIP.
201....................  COBRA JUDY...........................                   36,527                   36,527
202....................  NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-                  63,878                   63,878
                          SPACE (METOC).
203....................  JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS.                    4,435                    4,435
204....................  TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES....                   35,212                   18,912
                         Marinized UAS........................  .......................                  -16,300
206....................  AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS......  .......................                   50,200
                         Program increase.....................  .......................                   +5,200
                         EP-3/SPA systems development.........  .......................                  +45,000
207....................  MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS........                   19,263                   19,263
208....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/                       8,377                    8,377
                          SURFACE SYSTEMS.
209....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/                      16,665                   16,665
                          SURFACE SYSTEMS.
210....................  RQ-4 UAV.............................                  529,250                  529,250
211....................  MQ-8 UAV.............................                   10,665                   10,665
212....................  RQ-11 UAV............................                      512                      512
213....................  RQ-7 UAV.............................                      934                      934
214....................  SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS                            26,209                   26,209
                          (STUASL0).
215....................  SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS                            18,098                   12,710
                          (STUASL0).
                         STUAS Lite termination...............  .......................                   -5,388
218....................  MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT......                    8,158                    8,158
219....................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)...........                   18,649                   18,649
220....................  AVIONICS COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT                           3,250                    3,250
                          PROGRAM.
221....................  INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS..............                   46,173                   46,173
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                1,284,901                1,499,901
                         Classified adjustment................  .......................                 +215,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                17,693,496               17,736,303
                          EVALUATION, NAVY.
 
                               RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, AIR FORCE
 
1......................  DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............                  350,978                  350,978
2......................  UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES......                  136,297                  136,297

[[Page 1897]]

 
3......................  HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH                              13,198                   13,198
                          INITIATIVES.
4......................  MATERIALS............................                  137,273                  137,273
5......................  AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES.......                  144,699                  144,699
6......................  HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH.                   87,452                   87,452
7......................  AEROSPACE PROPULSION.................                  207,049                  204,049
                         Unjustified program growth...........  .......................                   -3,000
8......................  AEROSPACE SENSORS....................                  157,497                  159,897
                         Program Increase--Materials for        .......................                   +2,400
                          Structures, Propulsion, and
                          Subsystems.
9......................  SPACE TECHNOLOGY.....................                  111,857                  111,857
10.....................  CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS...............                   61,330                   61,330
11.....................  DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY...........                  103,596                  114,896
                         Re-alignment of funding for ground     .......................                  +11,300
                          optical imaging research and
                          technology.
13.....................  DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND                      117,283                  115,783
                          METHODS.
                         Transfer to line 11..................  .......................                   -1,500
14.....................  HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH...........                   53,384                   53,384
15.....................  ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS                   33,414                   40,414
                         Transfer to line 11..................  .......................                   -1,000
                         Metals Affordability Initiative......  .......................                   +8,000
16.....................  SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY                       2,935                    2,935
                          (S&T).
17.....................  ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS...........                   44,677                   44,677
18.....................  AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO........                   53,588                   52,588
                         Transfer to line 11..................  .......................                   -1,000
19.....................  AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER                         136,135                  134,135
                          TECHNOLOGY.
                         Transfer to line 11..................  .......................                   -2,000
21.....................  ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY.........                   16,992                   16,992
22.....................  ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY.......                   83,705                   80,115
                         Transfer to line 11..................  .......................                   -3,590
23.....................  MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)                    5,899                   13,399
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                   +7,500
24.....................  HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED                            24,814                   24,814
                          TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
25.....................  CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY......                   15,755                   15,755
26.....................  ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY..........                   17,461                   17,461
27.....................  MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.....                   39,701                   47,701
                         Program Increase--Best Industrial      .......................                   +8,000
                          Process for Department of Defense
                          Depots.
28.....................  BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT &                     32,382                   32,382
                          DEMONSTRATION.
30.....................  HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY                    1,847                    1,847
                          PROGRAM.
XX.....................  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION..                        0                  105,000
                         Research and Development Innovation..  .......................                 +105,000
31.....................  INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT....                    5,019                    5,019
32.....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT..........                    3,576                    1,000
                         Unjustified program request..........  .......................                   -2,576
33.....................  GPS III--OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT.                        0                  356,867
                         Operational Control Segment (OCX)--    .......................                 +356,867
                          Transfer from line 212.
34.....................  ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE).......                  351,817                  394,817
                         Program Increase--Capabilities         .......................                  +43,000
                          Insertion Program.
35.....................  POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)..............                  164,232                  164,232
36.....................  SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY.............                   45,012                   45,012
37.....................  COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY.....                   26,172                   36,172
                         Program Increase--Automatic Dependent  .......................                  +10,000
                          Surveillance--Broadcast.
38.....................  NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........                    4,372                    4,372
39.....................  INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D..                      635                      635
40.....................  SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP).......                    8,349                    8,349
42.....................  INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE.........                   20,580                   20,580
43.....................  INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE...                   66,745                   66,745
44.....................  WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SYSTEM RDT&E                         36,123                   79,123
                          (SPACE).
                         Program Increase--Capabilities         .......................                  +43,000
                          Insertion Program.
45.....................  POLLUTION PREVENTION (DEM/VAL).......                    2,534                    2,534
46.....................  JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING                    13,952                   13,952
                          SYSTEMS.
47.....................  NEXT GENERATION BOMBER...............                  198,957                  198,957
48.....................  BATTLE MGMT COM & CTRL SENSOR                                0                   12,000
                          DEVELOPMENT.
                         Program Increase--GMTI Radar           .......................                  +12,000
                          Development.
49.....................  HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT                    22,389                   22,389
                          SYSTEM.
50.....................  JOINT DUAL ROLE AIR DOMINANCE MISSILE                    9,799                    9,799
51.....................  REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION.                   34,339                   34,339
52.....................  NEXT-GENERATION MILSATCOM TECHNOLOGY                         0                   20,000
                          DEVELOPMENT.
                         Program Increase--Acquisition          .......................                  +20,000
                          Planning and Studies.
53.....................  GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE                              32,513                   22,513
                          DEVELOPMENT.
                         Program delay........................  .......................                  -10,000
54.....................  ALTERNATIVE FUELS....................                   24,064                   24,064
55.....................  AUTOMATED AIR-TO-AIR REFUELING.......                       85                       85
56.....................  OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE.......                   93,978                  125,978
  .....................  Program Increase - Responsive Launch   .......................                  +32,000
                          Capabilities.
57.....................  TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM..............                   12,260                   12,260
58.....................  NATIONAL POLAR-ORBITING OPERATIONAL                    325,505                  100,000
                          ENVIRONMENTAL SAT.
  .....................  Program Reduction....................  .......................                 -225,505
58A....................  DEFENSE WEATHER SATELLITE SYSTEM       .......................                   75,000
                          (DWSS).
  .....................  DWSS-only for defense sensor           .......................                  +75,000
                          development.
59.....................  GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS).......                   18,171                   18,171
60.....................  NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT..............                   60,545                   60,545
62.....................  SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT                         8,066                    8,066
                          TRAINING.
64.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT.......                   89,966                   89,966
65.....................  JOINT TACTICAL RADIO.................                      631                      631
66.....................  TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE....                  102,941                  102,941
67.....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT..........                       50                       50
68.....................  SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)............                  153,505                  100,505
  .....................  SDB II-Contract Award Delay..........  .......................                  -53,000
69.....................  COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS.................                   40,276                   40,276
70.....................  SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS....                  426,525                  350,425
  .....................  SBSS Follow On.......................  .......................                  -45,100
  .....................  Space Fence..........................  .......................                  -35,000
  .....................  Integration of Missile Defense Agency  .......................                   +4,000
                          radar systems into Space
                          Surveillance Network.
71.....................  AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK...........                   25,937                   25,937
72.....................  SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS)                    530,047                  530,047
                          HIGH EMD.
74.....................  ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT........                    6,693                    6,693
75.....................  SUBMUNITIONS.........................                    1,622                    1,622
76.....................  AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT.................                   37,987                   37,987
77.....................  LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS.................                   10,650                   10,650
78.....................  COMBAT TRAINING RANGES...............                   36,905                   36,905
79.....................  INTEGRATED COMMAND & CONTROL                                10                       10
                          APPLICATIONS (IC2A).
80.....................  INTELLIGENCE EQUIPMENT...............                    1,364                    1,364
81.....................  JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)...........                  883,773                1,051,210
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer from      .......................                 +159,837
                          line 135.
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer for Auto  .......................                   +7,600
                          GCAS from AP,AF line 43.
82.....................  INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE...                   71,843                   71,843
83.....................  EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE                       30,245                   55,245
                          PROGRAM (SPACE).
  .....................  Program Increase - EELV Common Upper   .......................                  +25,000
                          Stage.
85.....................  NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING                       863,875                        0
                          AIRCRAFT.
  .....................  Transfer to Tanker Transfer Fund.....  .......................                 -863,875
86.....................  CSAR HH-60 RECAPITALIZATION..........                   12,584                        0
  .....................  Program Termination..................  .......................                  -12,584

[[Page 1898]]

 
86A....................  HH-60 RDT&E..........................                        0                    1,934
  .....................  Terrain and Traffic Avoidance Systems- .......................                   +1,934
                          Transfer from line 86.
88.....................  HC/MC-130 RECAP RDT&E................                   15,536                   15,536
91.....................  SINGLE INTEGRATED AIR PICTURE (SIAP).                    1,832                        0
  .....................  Program termination..................  .......................                   -1,832
92.....................  FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING.........                   57,393                   57,393
94.....................  JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT (JCA)...........                   26,407                   26,407
95.....................  CV-22................................                   18,270                   18,270
96.....................  AIRBORNE SENIOR LEADER C3 (SLC3S)....                   15,826                    7,826
  .....................  Contract award delay for SLC3S-A       .......................                   -8,000
                          Communications Program (SCP).
97.....................  THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT.........                   21,245                   21,245
98.....................  MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT.................                   61,587                   61,587
99.....................  RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE...............                   26,752                   26,752
101....................  INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION                   20,665                   20,665
102....................  TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT..........                  759,868                  759,868
103....................  ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)                   23,551                   23,551
104....................  SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP).............                   47,623                   47,623
105....................  FACILITIES RESTORATION &                                46,327                   46,327
                          MODERNIZATION - TEST & EVAL.
106....................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT - TEST AND                       27,579                   27,579
                          EVALUATION SUPPORT.
107....................  MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING                       18,901                   18,901
                          INITIATIVE.
108....................  ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT...                   24,968                   24,968
109....................  GENERAL SKILL TRAINING...............                    1,544                    1,544
111....................  INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES.............                    3,764                    3,764
113....................  COMMON VERTICAL LIFT SUPPORT PLATFORM                        0                    4,000
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer from      .......................                   +4,000
                          AP,AF line 18.
114....................  AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN                     43,300                   23,300
                          RESOURCES SYSTEM.
  .....................  Funding ahead of need................  .......................                  -20,000
115....................  ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE                        42,255                   42,255
                          AGENCY.
117....................  B-52 SQUADRONS.......................                  146,096                  140,896
  .....................  EHF Request - early to need..........  .......................                  -24,700
  .....................  Program Increase to continue advanced  .......................                   +6,500
                          targeting pod integration.
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer from      .......................                  +13,000
                          AP,AF line 38 for Internal Weapons
                          Bay.
118....................  AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)...                    3,631                    3,631
119....................  B-1B SQUADRONS.......................                   33,234                   33,234
120....................  B-2 SQUADRONS........................                  260,466                  276,466
  .....................  Program Increase-Mixed Loads and       .......................                  +16,000
                          Other Capabilities.
121....................  STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM -                             28,441                   28,441
                          USSTRATCOM.
122....................  NIGHT FIST-USSTRATCOM................                    5,359                    5,359
125....................  REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL                         23,732                   23,732
                          CENTER MODERNIZATION.
126....................  STRATEGIC AEROSPACE INTELLIGENCE                            15                       15
                          SYSTEM ACTIVITIES.
127....................  WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS                    10,580                   10,580
                          (WRAP) RAPID TRAN.
128....................  MQ-9 UAV.............................                  125,427                  125,427
129....................  MULTI-PLATFORM ELECTRONIC WARFARE                       15,574                   15,574
                          EQUIPMENT.
130....................  A-10 SQUADRONS.......................                    5,661                    5,661
131....................  F-16 SQUADRONS.......................                  129,103                  129,103
132....................  F-15E SQUADRONS......................                  222,677                  207,677
  .....................  Contract award delays................  .......................                  -15,000
133....................  MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION.......                   12,937                   12,937
134....................  F-22 SQUADRONS.......................                  576,330                  511,330
  .....................  Modernization program................  .......................                 -100,000
  .....................  MADL-Transfer from line 155..........  .......................                  +35,000
135....................  F-35 SQUADRONS.......................                  217,561                        0
  .....................  Block 4 Development..................  .......................                  -57,724
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer to line   .......................                 -159,837
                          81.
136....................  TACTICAL AIM MISSILES................                    6,040                    6,040
137....................  ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR                        62,922                   62,922
                          MISSILE (AMRAAM).
138....................  JOINT HELMET MOUNTED CUEING SYSTEM                       2,407                    2,407
                          (JHMCS).
139....................  COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY...........                      944                      944
140....................  COMBAT RESCUE-PARARESCUE.............                    2,921                    2,921
141....................  AF TENCAP............................                   11,648                   11,648
142....................  PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT.                    3,017                    3,017
143....................  COMPASS CALL.........................                   20,652                   20,652
144....................  AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT                  147,396                  120,626
                          PROGRAM.
  .....................  F-135 Component Improvement Program-   .......................                  -26,770
                          premature request.
146....................  JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE                   20,000                   20,000
                          (JASSM).
147....................  AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)                   93,102                   93,102
148....................  CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)...                   58,313                   58,313
149....................  AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM                    239,755                  229,755
                          (AWACS).
  .....................  Contract award and schedule delays     .......................                  -10,000
                          for Block 40/45 EMD and DRAGON.
151....................  ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS......                   67,532                   67,532
153....................  COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM                           3,310                    3,310
                          ACTIVITIES.
154....................  THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I..                   15,170                   15,170
155....................  FIGHTER TACTICAL DATA LINK...........                   85,492                   23,992
  .....................  MADL-Transfer to line 134............  .......................                  -61,500
157....................  C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK.............                    1,584                    1,584
158....................  COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2)                                24,229                   24,229
                          CONSTELLATION.
159....................  JOINT SURVEILLANCE AND TARGET ATTACK                   168,917                  168,917
                          RADAR SYSTEM.
160....................  SEEK EAGLE...........................                   19,263                   19,263
161....................  USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION.........                   21,638                   21,638
162....................  WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS.....                    6,020                    6,020
163....................  DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES...                    2,863                    2,863
164....................  MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS.............                   79,112                   79,112
165....................  INFORMATION WARFARE SUPPORT..........                    2,294                    2,294
166....................  CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES.............                    1,117                    1,117
173....................  SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE.......                   10,006                   10,006
174....................  E-4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS                       12,532                   12,532
                          CENTER (NAOC).
175....................  MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY                             78,784                   68,984
                          COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK.
  .....................  MMPU Production-Air Force requested    .......................                   -9,800
                          transfer to MP,AF line 9.
176....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM.                  140,017                  140,017
177....................  GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM.........                    3,393                    3,393
178....................  GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM....                    3,055                    5,212
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer from      .......................                   +2,157
                          line 179.
179....................  JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL PROGRAM                        2,157                        0
                          (JC2).
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer to line   .......................                   -2,157
                          178.
180....................  MILSATCOM TERMINALS..................                  186,582                  306,282
  .....................  FAB-T-Air Force requested transfer     .......................                 +119,700
                          from AP,AF line 75.
182....................  AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE...........                  149,268                  144,268
  .....................  Program execution....................  .......................                   -5,000
185....................  GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM).                    5,708                    5,708
186....................  CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............                    2,030                    2,030
187....................  DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER...............                      279                      279
188....................  SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)....                   21,667                   21,667
189....................  WEATHER SERVICE......................                   32,373                   32,373
190....................  AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, &                        33,268                   33,268
                          LANDING SYSTEM (ATC).
191....................  AERIAL TARGETS.......................                   63,573                   58,573
  .....................  Program execution....................  .......................                   -5,000
194....................  SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES                      469                      469
196....................  DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE                           40                       40
                          ACTIVITIES.
198....................  NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM                      165,936                  165,936
                          (USER EQUIPMENT).
199....................  NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM                       34,471                   34,471
                          (SPACE AND CONTROL).

[[Page 1899]]

 
201....................  SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION                    4,572                    4,572
                          CENTER.
202....................  SPACE WARFARE CENTER.................                    2,929                    2,929
203....................  SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE).......                    9,933                    9,933
204....................  INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION                      1,254                    1,254
                          OPERATIONS.
206....................  AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS......                  168,963                   90,263
  .....................  Wide Area Airborne Surveillance        .......................                  -78,700
                          Program of Record - ahead of need.
207....................  MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS........                   15,337                   15,337
208....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE                       93,398                   85,898
                          SYSTEMS.
  .....................  Program Reduction....................  .......................                   -7,500
209....................  PREDATOR UAV (JMIP)..................                   28,913                   23,913
  .....................  Program execution....................  .......................                   -5,000
210....................  RQ-4 UAV.............................                  251,318                  220,318
  .....................  Execution adjustment.................  .......................                  -31,000
211....................  NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET                     7,267                    7,267
                          (TIARA).
212....................  GPS III SPACE SEGMENT................                  828,171                  446,304
  .....................  Operational Control Segment (OCX)-     .......................                 -381,867
                          Transfer to line 33.
213....................  JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM.................                  132,706                  109,506
  .....................  JSPOC Mission System.................  .......................                  -28,000
  .....................  Karnac...............................  .......................                   +4,800
214....................  INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION                      5,512                    5,512
                          WARFARE.
215....................  NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE).......                   72,199                   72,199
216....................  NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE OFFICE.......                   10,630                        0
  .....................  Program termination-Funding            .......................                  -10,630
                          transferred to Executive Agent for
                          Space, OM,AF.
217....................  SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS.                   43,838                   43,838
218....................  INFORMATION OPS TECHNOLOGY                              21,912                   21,912
                          INTEGRATION & TOOL DEVELOP.
219....................  SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)...........                    2,952                    2,952
220....................  C-130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON...............                  113,107                   43,472
  .....................  Air Force requested transfer to AP,AF  .......................                  -69,635
                          line 61.
221....................  C-5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS................                   58,990                   58,990
222....................  C-17 AIRCRAFT........................                  177,212                  162,212
  .....................  Contract award delays................  .......................                  -15,000
223....................  C-130J PROGRAM.......................                   26,770                   26,770
224....................  LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES                       17,227                   17,227
                          (LAIRCM).
225....................  KC-135S..............................                   20,453                   20,453
226....................  KC-10S...............................                   56,669                   41,669
  .....................  Milestone B slip.....................  .......................                  -15,000
227....................  OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT..........                    4,988                    4,988
228....................  C-STOL AIRCRAFT......................                    1,283                    1,283
230....................  SPECIAL TACTICS/COMBAT CONTROL.......                    7,345                    7,345
231....................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)...........                    1,514                    1,514
234....................  LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY                       227,614                  227,614
                          (LOGIT).
235....................  SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT..........                    6,141                   38,141
                         Alternative energy research and        .......................                  +32,000
                          integration.
235A...................  AIR FORCE RECRUITING INFORMATION                             0                    5,100
                          SUPPORT SYSTEM.
                         Air Force Recruiting Information       .......................                   +5,100
                          Support System--Air Force requested
                          transfer from OM, AF.
236....................  OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING................                      667                      667
237....................  JOINT NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER.......                        9                        9
239....................  OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES...........                      116                      116
240....................  JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY......                    6,107                    6,107
242....................  CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM........                    7,811                    7,811
243....................  PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION.............                   11,179                   11,179
244....................  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION                        49,816                   49,816
                          SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.
                         CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................               12,406,781               12,915,571
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                 +508,790
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                27,247,302               26,517,405
                          EVALUATION, AIR FORCE.
 
                             RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE
 
1......................  DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP                   47,412                   47,412
                          BASIC RESEARCH.
2......................  DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............                  328,195                  295,695
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                  -32,500
5......................  NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM...                  109,911                   94,311
                         Unexecutable growth..................  .......................                  -15,600
6......................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                         49,508                   49,508
                          PROGRAM.
7......................  INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS--EXPLORATORY                      22,448                   20,448
                          DEVELOPMENT.
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                   -2,000
8......................  HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV                      15,067                   23,067
                          (HBCU) SCIENCE.
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                   +8,000
9......................  LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM..                   32,830                   32,830
10.....................  INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS                         281,262                  253,262
                          TECHNOLOGY.
                         DISCOVER contract award delays.......  .......................                  -10,000
                         Extreme Computing contract award       .......................                  -18,000
                          delays.
11.....................  COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS..........                   90,143                   90,143
12.....................  MACHINE INTELLIGENCE.................                   44,682                   44,682
13.....................  BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE...........                   32,692                   32,692
14.....................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                        169,287                  174,287
                          PROGRAM.
                         TMTI BA 5 unexecutable funding         .......................                   +5,000
                          transferred back to S&T at request
                          of the Department.
15.....................  JOINT DATA MANAGEMENT ADVANCED                           3,261                        0
                          DEVELOPMENT.
                         Duplicate effort.....................  .......................                   -3,261
16.....................  CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH..............                   10,000                    5,000
                         Lack of authorization................  .......................                   -5,000
17.....................  HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR                       9,499                    7,999
                          MODELING (HSCB) APP.
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                   -1,500
18.....................  TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY..................                  224,378                  224,378
19.....................  MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY..                  312,586                  307,586
                         Unsustained growth...................  .......................                   -5,000
20.....................  ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY...............                  286,936                  266,936
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                  -20,000
21.....................  WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT                     212,742                  212,742
                          TECHNOLOGIES.
22.....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY                           26,545                   36,745
                          DEVELOPMENT.
                         Program Increase--Unfunded             .......................                  +15,200
                          Requirement.
                         Unexecutable growth..................  .......................                   -5,000
24.....................  JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH                           20,556                   15,556
                          INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS AD.
                         Unjustified growth...................  .......................                   -5,000
25.....................  SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT..........                   44,423                   44,423
26.....................  COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY                          85,299                   85,299
                          SUPPORT.
27.....................  COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES--                     295,163                  295,163
                          PROLIF PREV & DEFEAT.
28.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY.                  132,220                   92,220
                         SM-3 Block IIB Development transfer    .......................                  -40,000
                          to line 84, AEGIS BMD.
29.....................  JOINT ADVANCED CONCEPTS..............                    6,808                    6,808
30.....................  JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY                      22,700                   22,700
                          DEVELOPMENT.
31.....................  AGILE TRANSPO FOR THE 21ST CENTURY                         750                      750
                          (AT21)--THEATER CA.
32.....................  ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS...........                  303,078                  241,378
                         ArcLight.............................  .......................                   -5,000
                         ISIS lack of transition partner......  .......................                  -21,700
                         MoTr program delays..................  .......................                  -15,000
                         Vulture program descope and delays...  .......................                  -20,000
33.....................  SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY........                   98,130                   98,130
34.....................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                        177,113                  222,713
                          PROGRAM--ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.
                         TMTI BA 5 unexecutable funding         .......................                  +45,600
                          transferred back to S&T at request
                          of the Department.

[[Page 1900]]

 
35.....................  JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.                    8,386                    8,386
36.....................  JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY                            206,917                  191,917
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
                         Unjustified growth...................  .......................                  -15,000
37.....................  NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES                   30,035                   25,035
                         Unjustified growth...................  .......................                   -5,000
38.....................  JOINT DATA MANAGEMENT RESEARCH.......                    6,289                    4,289
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                   -2,000
39.....................  BIOMETRICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY....                   11,416                   11,416
40.....................  CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH.....                   10,000                    5,000
                         Lack of authorization................  .......................                   -5,000
41.....................  HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR                      11,510                   10,510
                          MODELING (HSCB) ADV.
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                   -1,000
42.....................  DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE                      18,916                   42,916
                          AND TECHNOLOGY PROG.
                         Industrial Base Innovation Fund......  .......................                  +24,000
43.....................  JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM/AUTONOMOUS                        9,943                    9,943
                          SYSTEMS.
44.....................  GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY                        20,542                   20,542
                          DEMONSTRATIONS.
45.....................  DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION                             29,109                   29,109
                          ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY.
46.....................  STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH                        68,021                   64,021
                          PROGRAM.
                         Unexecutable growth..................  .......................                   -4,000
47.....................  MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY                              26,878                   26,878
                          DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT.
48.....................  JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM............                   10,966                   10,966
49.....................  ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES....                  197,098                  197,098
52.....................  HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING                             200,986                  240,986
                          MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.
                         Program adjustment...................  .......................                  +40,000
53.....................  COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS                    219,809                  219,809
                          SYSTEMS.
54.....................  CLASSIFIED DARPA PROGRAMS............                  167,008                  150,308
                         Poor justification materials.........  .......................                  -16,700
55.....................  NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY...                  234,985                  227,985
                         Unsustained growth...................  .......................                   -7,000
56.....................  SENSOR TECHNOLOGY....................                  205,032                  205,032
58.....................  DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED                           13,986                   13,986
                          TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
59.....................  SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE.......                   30,910                   30,910
61.....................  QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS......                   78,244                   58,244
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                  -13,000
                         P826--Excess to Quick Reaction Fund    .......................                   -7,000
                          requirements.
62.....................  JOINT EXPERIMENTATION................                  111,946                   91,946
                         Excessive growth.....................  .......................                  -20,000
63.....................  MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT                      38,140                   33,140
                          OFFICE.
                         Unexecutable growth..................  .......................                   -5,000
64.....................  DIRECTED ENERGY RESEARCH.............                   98,688                  123,688
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                  +25,000
65.....................  TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE &                             97,642                   97,642
                          TECHNOLOGY.
66.....................  TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER..................                   23,310                   17,310
                         Unjustified growth...................  .......................                   -6,000
67.....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED                             30,806                   38,806
                          TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
                         SOF ACTD Programs....................  .......................                   +8,000
68.....................  AVIATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS........                    4,234                    4,234
69.....................  SOF INFORMATION & BROADCAST SYSTEMS                      4,942                    4,942
                          ADVANCED TECHNOLOG.
69X....................  INNOVATIVE RESEARCH..................                        0                  124,200
                         Program adjustment...................  .......................                 +124,200
70.....................  NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL                       32,132                   32,132
                          SECURITY EQUIPMENT.
71.....................  RETRACT LARCH........................                   21,592                   21,592
72.....................  JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM...............                    9,878                    9,878
73.....................  ADVANCE SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM..                   18,060                   18,060
74.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL                        30,419                   30,419
                          CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.
75.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL                     436,482                  431,482
                          DEFENSE SEGMENT.
                         Funding no longer required for         .......................                   -5,000
                          transition to Reagan Test Site.
76.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE                  1,346,181                1,311,181
                          DEFENSE SEGMENT.
                         Excess Award Fee and Test and          .......................                  -35,000
                          Integration Delays.
78.....................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                        277,062                  271,062
                          PROGRAM.
                         Improved Nerve Agent Treatment         .......................                   -5,000
                          System--slow obligation rate in
                          fiscal year 2010.
                         Lightweight Chemical/Biological        .......................                   -1,000
                          Ensemble execution delays.
79.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS....                  454,859                  392,159
                         Transfer to line 88 for Concurrent     .......................                  -35,900
                          Test, Training and Operations.
                         Transfer to line 88 for TPY-2 C2BMC    .......................                  -13,000
                          Fielding.
                         Transfer to line 88 for BMDS Radars    .......................                  -13,800
                          Communications Sustainment (TPY-2).
81.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST &                     1,113,425                1,008,525
                          TARGETS.
                         Transfer to lines 82 and 88..........  .......................                  -94,900
                         Funding no longer required for move    .......................                   -5,000
                          to Reagan Test Site.
                         Program Growth in Program Operations   .......................                   -5,000
                          Systems Engineering and Systems
                          Management.
82.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING                     402,769                  406,269
                          PROGRAMS.
                         Transfer from line 81................  .......................                  +43,500
                         Excessive contractor support,          .......................                  -40,000
                          advisory services and program growth.
83.....................  SPECIAL PROGRAMS--MDA................                  270,189                  245,189
                         Transfer to higher priority near-term  .......................                  -25,000
                          MDA procurement programs.
84.....................  AEGIS BMD............................                1,467,278                1,569,278
                         Program growth.......................  .......................                  -12,000
                         Navy requested transfer from OP,N      .......................                  +72,500
                          line 109.
                         Aegis BMD Ships--Navy requested        .......................                   +1,500
                          transfer from OM,N line 1B5B.
                         SM-3 Block IIB Development--transfer   .......................                  +40,000
                          from line 28.
85.....................  SPACE SURVEILLANCE & TRACKING SYSTEM.                  112,678                  112,678
87.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM                        10,942                   10,942
                          SPACE PROGRAMS.
88.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE C2BMC......                  342,625                  456,725
                         Transfer from line 81 for Concurrent   .......................                  +51,400
                          Test, Training and Operations.
                         Transfer from line 79 for Concurrent   .......................                  +35,900
                          Test, Training and Operations.
                         Transfer from line 79 for TPY-2 C2BMC  .......................                  +13,000
                          Fielding.
                         Transfer from line 79 for BMDS Radar   .......................                  +13,800
                          Communications Sustainement (TPY-2).
90.....................  BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT                         68,726                   58,726
                          WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
                         Duplication of effort with MDA core    .......................                  -10,000
                          programs.
91.....................  CENTER (MDIOC).......................                   86,198                   86,198
92.....................  REGARDING TRENCH.....................                    7,529                    7,529
93.....................  SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX).........                  153,056                  153,056
98.....................  ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS.........                  121,735                  209,935
                         David's Sling Weapons Program........  .......................                  +38,000
                         Arrow System Improvement Program       .......................                  +42,000
                          (ASIP).
                         Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor         .......................                   +8,200
                          Program.
99.....................  HUMANITARIAN DEMINING................                   14,735                   14,735
100....................  COALITION WARFARE....................                   13,786                   13,786
101....................  DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION                          4,802                   39,502
                          PROGRAM.
                         Department of Defense Corrosion        .......................                  +34,700
                          Prevention and Control Program.
102....................  DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS)                      49,292                   49,292
                          COMMON DEVELOPMENT.
104....................  HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR                       7,459                    7,459
                          MODELING (HSCB) RES.
105....................  JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION COMMAND                       19,413                   19,413
                          (JSIC).
106....................  JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION &                               16,637                   16,637
                          INTEROPERABILITY TEAM.
107....................  LAND-BASED SM-3 (LBSM3)..............                  281,378                  281,378
108....................  AEGIS SM-3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT..                  318,800                  318,800
109....................  PRECISION TRACKING SPACE SYSTEM RDT&E                   66,969                   36,969
  .....................  Transfer to higher priority near-term  .......................                  -30,000
                          MDA procurement programs.
110....................  AIRBORNE INFRARED (ABIR).............                  111,671                   76,671
  .....................  Transfer to higher priority near-term  .......................                  -35,000
                          MDA procurement programs.

[[Page 1901]]

 
111....................  REDUCTION OF TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST....                   20,310                   20,310
112....................  JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY                         4,027                    4,027
                          (JET) PROGRAM.
113....................  DEFENSE ACQUISITION CHALLENGE PROGRAM                   24,344                   24,344
                          (DACP).
114....................  NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL                        7,973                    7,973
                          SECURITY EQUIPMENT.
115....................  PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY                        239,861                  239,861
                          DEVELOPMENT.
116....................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                        407,162                  300,562
                          PROGRAM.
  .....................  Plague Vaccine - slow obligation rate  .......................                   -5,000
                          in fiscal year 2010.
  .....................  TMTI BA 5 unexecutable funding         .......................                  -65,600
                          transferred back to S&T at request
                          of the Department.
  .....................  Bioscavenger Increment II schedule     .......................                  -12,000
                          delays.
  .....................  Decontamination Family of Systems      .......................                   -9,000
                          schedule delays.
  .....................  Next Generation Chemical Standoff      .......................                   -9,000
                          Detection schedule delays.
  .....................  SSI NBCRS growth without acquisition   .......................                   -6,000
                          strategy.
117....................  JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM...............                    4,155                    4,155
118....................  ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM                      49,364                   23,695
                          OFFICE (AITS-JPO).
  .....................  Technology Initiatives Investment      .......................                  -25,669
                          Fund.
119....................  JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION                              20,954                   20,954
                          DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS).
120....................  WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT                       7,307                    7,307
                          CAPABILITIES.
121....................  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT...                   11,937                   11,937
122....................  DEFENSE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN                       11,800                   11,800
                          RESOURCES SYSTEM.
123....................  BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION AGENCY R&D                     184,131                  181,166
                          ACTIVITIES.
  .....................  VIPS Increment II contract award in    .......................                   -2,965
                          fiscal year 2012.
124....................  HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY                                391                      391
                          INITIATIVE.
125....................  OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES...                    5,000                    5,000
126....................  TRUSTED FOUNDRY......................                   35,512                   35,512
128....................  GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM.........                   17,842                   17,842
130....................  WOUNDED ILL AND INJURED SENIOR                           1,590                    1,590
                          OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.
132....................  DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM                       5,113                    5,113
                          (DRRS).
133....................  JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE                               8,052                    8,052
                          DEVELOPMENT.
134....................  CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION                            162,286                  162,286
                          INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT.
135....................  ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS..........                    2,500                    2,500
136....................  THERMAL VICAR........................                    8,851                    8,851
137....................  JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST                          10,287                   10,287
                          CAPABILITY (JMETC).
138....................  TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND                          49,282                   49,282
                          ANALYSIS.
139....................  USD(A&T)--CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT                    4,743                    4,743
140....................  FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND                        95,520                   95,520
                          EXPLOITATION.
141....................  JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE                   94,577                   94,577
                          ORGANIZATION.
142....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P)............                        0                  106,000
  .....................  Classified Program USD(P)............  .......................                 +106,000
143....................  FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING..........                   32,755                   27,755
  .....................  Unjustified growth...................  .......................                   -5,000
144....................  SYSTEMS ENGINEERING..................                   29,824                   37,024
  .....................  Sustainment of fiscal year 2010 level  .......................                   +7,200
145....................  NUCLEAR MATTERS - PHYSICAL SECURITY..                    6,264                    6,264
146....................  SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION                     15,091                   15,091
                          INTEGRATION.
147....................  GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)                    6,227                    6,227
147X...................  DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT                          0                   12,000
                          CAPACITY.
  .....................  Program Increase - contract            .......................                  +12,000
                          management services program.
148....................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                        120,995                  120,995
                          PROGRAM.
155....................  SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/                      2,189                    2,189
                          CHALLENGE ADMINISTR.
156....................  DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS..........                   13,858                   11,158
  .....................  P796 - Technical Grand Challenge       .......................                   -2,700
                          Program.
157....................  FORCE TRANSFORMATION DIRECTORATE.....                   19,701                   19,701
158....................  DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER                    61,054                   58,554
                          (DTIC).
  .....................  Excessive growth.....................  .......................                   -2,500
159....................  R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT,                       64,737                   64,737
                          TESTING & EVALUATION.
160....................  DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION......                   18,688                   25,888
  .....................  Sustainment of fiscal year 2010 level  .......................                   +7,200
161....................  DARPA AGENCY RELOCATION..............                   11,000                   11,000
162....................  MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH &                     56,257                   56,257
                          DEVELOPMENT).
163....................  BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS.......                    6,099                    6,099
164....................  AVIATION SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES.........                   10,900                   10,900
165....................  JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT.......                   23,081                    8,081
  .....................  Growth without acquisition strategy..  .......................                  -15,000
168....................  SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS                       31,500                   31,500
                          (IO) CAPABILITIES.
169....................  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RAPID                             5,135                    5,135
                          ACQUISITION.
170....................  CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............                   10,000                   10,000
171....................  INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION                     21,272                   21,272
                          OPERATIONS (IO).
173....................  WARFIGHTING AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED                       845                      845
                          SUPPORT.
174....................  COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND                           92,253                   48,688
                          TRAINING TRANSFORMATION.
  .....................  P 754 - Initiatives funded by          .......................                  -33,315
                          Services.
  .....................  P 764 - NPSUE funding without program  .......................                  -10,250
175....................  PENTAGON RESERVATION.................                   20,482                   20,482
176....................  MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS - MDA........                   29,754                   29,754
177....................  IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES..........                      278                      278
  .....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                   61,577                   61,577
178....................  DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR                           5,522                    1,000
                          SECURITY (DISS).
  .....................  Unjustified program..................  .......................                   -4,522
179....................  REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH &                        2,139                    2,139
                          PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE.
180....................  OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE                           290                      290
                          SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM.
181....................  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE                          6,634                    6,634
                          (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT).
183....................  JOINT INTEGRATION AND                                   44,139                   44,139
                          INTEROPERABILITY.
185....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                    2,288                    2,288
186....................  C4I INTEROPERABILITY.................                   74,023                   74,023
188....................  JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION                       9,379                    9,379
                          SHARING.
195....................  NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE                      467                      467
                          SUPPORT.
196....................  DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE                             16,629                   36,629
                          ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION.
  .....................  Cyber Security Pilot Programs........  .......................                  +20,000
197....................  LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS (DCS).......                    9,130                    9,130
198....................  MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY                              9,529                    9,529
                          COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK.
199....................  PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)......                    8,881                    8,881
200....................  KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)..                   45,941                   45,941
201....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM.                   14,077                   14,077
202....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM.                  388,827                  388,827
205....................  C4I FOR THE WARRIOR..................                    2,261                    2,261
206....................  GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM....                   26,247                   25,047
  .....................  Fiscal year 2012 testing.............  .......................                   -1,200
207....................  JOINT SPECTRUM CENTER................                   20,991                   20,991
208....................  NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES                          3,366                    3,366
                          (NCES).
209....................  JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE..                    1,161                    1,161
210....................  TELEPORT PROGRAM.....................                    6,880                    6,880
211....................  SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR                                16,272                   16,272
                          CONTINGENCIES.
214....................  CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............                      501                      501
216....................  CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............                    2,251                    2,251
217....................  CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............                   10,486                   10,486
221....................  POLICY R&D PROGRAMS..................                    9,136                    9,136
223....................  NET CENTRICITY.......................                   29,831                   14,831
  .....................  Unjustified growth...................  .......................                  -15,000
227....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE                        1,290                    1,290
                          SYSTEMS.
230....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE                        3,513                    3,513
                          SYSTEMS.
232....................  MQ-1 PREDATOR A UAV..................                       98                       98

[[Page 1902]]

 
234....................  HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER                     2,988                    2,988
                          PROGRAM.
235....................  INT'L INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY                            1,416                    1,416
                          ASSESSMENT, ADVANCEMENT.
245....................  INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS..............                   21,798                   21,798
246....................  LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.........                    2,813                    2,813
247....................  MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS)........                    2,807                    2,807
249....................  NATO AGS.............................                   93,885                   93,885
250....................  MQ-9 UAV.............................                       98                       98
252....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS                     68,691                   68,691
                          ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.
253....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS TACTICAL SYSTEMS                      1,582                    1,582
                          DEVELOPMENT.
254....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE                         23,879                   25,479
                          SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.
  .....................  Program Increase - Unfunded            .......................                   +1,600
                          Requirement.
255....................  SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS.........                   62,592                   63,692
  .....................  Program Increase - Unfunded            .......................                   +4,000
                          Requirement.
  .....................  Program termination..................  .......................                   -2,900
256....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS CV-22 DEVELOPMENT.                   14,406                   14,406
257....................  JOINT MULTI-MISSION SUBMERSIBLE......                   14,924                        0
  .....................  SOCOM requested transfer to line 269.  .......................                  -14,924
259....................  MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATION                         2,915                    2,915
                          SYSTEMS (MTPS).
261....................  MC130J SOF TANKER RECAPITALIZATION...                    7,624                    7,624
262....................  SOF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND                         1,922                      922
                          ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS.
  .....................  Execution delays.....................  .......................                   -1,000
263....................  SOF TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS...........                    2,347                    2,347
264....................  SOF WEAPONS SYSTEMS..................                      479                      479
265....................  SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL                        593                      593
                          SYSTEMS.
267....................  SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES................                    1,994                      994
  .....................  Change in requirements...............  .......................                   -1,000
268....................  SOF ROTARY WING AVIATION.............                   14,473                   33,715
  .....................  SOCOM requested transfer from P,DW     .......................                  +19,242
                          line 57.
269....................  SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS...............                   13,986                   28,910
  .....................  SOCOM requested transfer from line     .......................                  +14,924
                          257.
270....................  SOF SURFACE CRAFT....................                    2,933                   18,933
  .....................  Program Increase - CCM Unfunded        .......................                  +16,000
                          Requirement.
271....................  SOF PSYOP............................                    4,193                    4,193
272....................  SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE                            5,135                    5,135
                          ACTIVITIES.
273....................  SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS                             9,167                    9,167
                          INTELLIGENCE.
  .....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                3,832,019                4,011,571
  .....................  Classified adjustment................  .......................                 +179,552
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                20,661,600               20,797,412
                          EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE.
 
                                     OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE
 
1......................  OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION......                   59,430                   59,430
2......................  LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION........                   12,899                   12,899
3......................  OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND                        122,581                  122,581
                          ANALYSES.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION,                  194,910                  194,910
                          DEFENSE.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                76,130,700               74,957,028
                          EVALUATION.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          P-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                          NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
 
                         STRATEGIC SHIP ACQUISITION...........                  411,202                  911,202
                         Program Increase--Accelerate Mobile    .......................  .......................
                          Landing Platform.
                         Additional Mobile Landing Platform...  .......................                  500,000
                         DoD MOBILIZATION ASSETS..............                  158,647                  158,647
                         STRATEGIC SEALIFT SUPPORT............                    4,875                    4,875
                         SEALIFT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.....                   28,012                   28,012
                         READY RESERVE FORCE OPERATIONS AND                     332,130                  332,130
                          MAINTENANCE.
                         MARITIME ADMINISTRATION SHIP           .......................                   40,000
                          FINANCING GUARANTEE PROGRAM.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND.                  934,866                1,474,866
 
                                             DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
 
                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............               29,915,277               29,671,764
                         IN-HOUSE CARE........................                7,781,877                7,791,077
                         Army Substance Abuse Program-Transfer                    2,800                   -2,800
                          to OM,A line 131.
                         Pain Management Task Force...........  .......................                  +12,000
                         PRIVATE SECTOR CARE..................               16,034,745               15,673,745
                         TRICARE Underexecution...............  .......................                 -236,000
                         Global Deployment of the Force         .......................                 -125,000
                          medical research funding-DOD
                          requested transfer to maintain full
                          funding for the program.
                         CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CARE.............                2,122,483                2,085,770
                         Army Substance Abuse Program-Transfer                   27,825                  -27,825
                          to OM,A line 131.
                         Psychological Health-State Directors   .......................                   -8,888
                          for the National Guard-Transfer to
                          OM,ARNG line 133.
                         INFORMATION MANAGEMENT/IT............                1,452,330                1,452,330
                         MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS..............                  293,698                  288,698
                         MHS Strategic Communications           .......................                   -5,000
                          efficiencies.
                         EDUCATION AND TRAINING...............                  632,534                  632,534
                         BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS...                1,597,610                1,747,610
                         Medical Facilities Sustainment,        .......................                 +150,000
                          Restoration and Modernization.
                         PROCUREMENT..........................                  519,921                  534,921
                         Procurement of Medical Equipment and   .......................                  +15,000
                          IO&T--Navy.
                         RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.............                  499,913                1,175,513
                         ALS..................................  .......................                   +8,000
                         Armed Forces Institute of              .......................                   +4,800
                          Regenerative Medicine.
                         Autism Research......................  .......................                   +6,400
                         Bone Marrow Failure Disease Research   .......................                   +4,000
                          Program.
                         Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy..........  .......................                   +4,000
                         Global HIV/AIDS Prevention...........  .......................                  +10,000
                         Traumatic Brain Injury and             .......................                 +100,000
                          Psychological Health.
                         Global Deployment of the Force         .......................                 +125,000
                          medical research funding--Department
                          of Defense requested transfer to
                          maintain full funding for the
                          program.
                         Gulf War Illness Peer-Reviewed         .......................                   +8,000
                          Research Program.
                         Multiple Sclerosis...................  .......................                   +4,800
                         Peer-Reviewed Alzheimer Research.....  .......................                  +15,000
                         Peer-Reviewed Breast Cancer Research   .......................                 +150,000
                          Program.
                         Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Program  .......................                  +16,000
                         Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research     .......................                  +12,800
                          Program.
                         Peer-Reviewed Orthopedic Research      .......................                  +24,000
                          Program.
                         Peer-Reviewed Ovarian Cancer Research  .......................                  +20,000
                          Program.
                         Peer Reviewed Vision research in       .......................                   +4,000
                          conjunction with the DoD Vision
                          Center of Excellence.
                         Peer-Reviewed Prostate Cancer          .......................                  +80,000
                          Research Program.
                         Peer-Reviewed Spinal Cord Research     .......................                  +12,000
                          Program.
                         Research in Alcohol and Substance Use  .......................                   +5,200
                          Disorders.
                         SBIR to the core funded RDT&E........  .......................                   +1,200
                         Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC).....  .......................                   +6,400
                         Pain Management Task Force Research..  .......................                   +4,000

[[Page 1903]]

 
                         Peer Reviewed Medical Research         .......................                  +50,000
                          Program.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM........               30,935,111               31,382,198
 
                               CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE
 
                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............                1,067,364                1,067,364
                         PROCUREMENT..........................                    7,132                    7,132
                         RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND                        392,811                  392,811
                          EVALUATION.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS                 1,467,307                1,467,307
                          DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE.
 
                             DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE
 
PC1293.................  Supplies and Materials (non-fund)--    .......................                   -1,000
                          NSA.
PC1329.................  Other Intra-Governmental Purchases--   .......................                   -2,500
                          Navy.
PC6501.................  Other Intra-Governmental Purchases--   .......................                   -2,000
                          OSD.
PC9206.................  Other Intra-Governmental Purchases--   .......................                   -4,000
                          OSD.
PC9205.................  EUCOM Counternarcotics Operations      .......................                   -3,000
                          Support excessive growth.
PC1293.................  International crime and narcotics      .......................                   -1,000
                          analytic tools excessive growth.
PC2360.................  EUCOM Tactical Analysis Team Support   .......................                   -1,500
                          unauthorized new Start.
                         FFRDC cost growth and CN indicated no  .......................                  -11,394
                          need.
                         National Guard Counter-Drug Program-   .......................                  +50,000
                          State Plans.
                         Young Marines-Drug Demand Reduction..  .......................                   +2,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-                1,131,351                1,156,957
                          DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE.
 
                                  JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND
 
4......................  STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE.............                  215,868                        0
                         Transfer to Title IX.................  .......................                 -215,868
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE                      215,868                        0
                          DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.
 
                                         OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
 
                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............                  282,354                  305,794
                         Program Increase.....................  .......................                  +23,440
                         PROCUREMENT..........................                    1,000                    1,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         .....................................  .......................  .......................
                         TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR                         283,354                  306,794
                          GENERAL.
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE                  34,032,991               34,313,256
                          PROGRAMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          M-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                1,237,779                1,237,779
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                  313,278                  313,278
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                  349,839                  349,839
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                   44,752                   44,752
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                    2,835                    2,835
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  159,261                  159,261
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                   56,632                   56,632
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                    1,303                    1,303
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                   94,650                   94,650
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                2,260,329                2,260,329
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                2,708,271                2,708,271
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                  693,325                  693,325
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                1,113,877                1,113,877
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                    6,714                    6,714
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                  574,120                  574,120
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                  241,921                  241,921
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                   26,276                   26,276
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                  207,174                  207,174
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................                5,571,678                5,571,678
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                  329,046                  329,046
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                1,871,805                1,871,805
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                2,200,851                2,200,851
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                   45,512                   45,512
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                  107,025                  107,025
                         ROTATIONAL TRAVEL....................                   45,514                   45,514
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                  198,051                  198,051
 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES                          16,102                   16,102
                          SAVINGS.
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                   66,220                   66,220
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                  192,223                  192,223
                         RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM...                    1,895                    1,895
                         SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS...........                  171,060                  171,060
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                  447,500                  447,500
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                  789,624
                         Undistributed Transfer from Title I..  .......................                 +789,624
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY......               10,678,409               11,468,033
 
                                            MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                  213,340                  213,340
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                   59,067                   59,067
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                   67,023                   67,023
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                    7,315                    7,315
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                    1,543                    1,543
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   16,667                   16,667
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                   16,754                   16,754
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                       14                       14
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                   16,320                   16,320
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                  398,043                  398,043
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                  262,656                  262,656
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                   74,338                   74,338
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                  121,913                  121,913
                         INCENTIVE PAYS.......................                      325                      325

[[Page 1904]]

 
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   80,007                   80,007
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                   27,692                   27,692
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                    3,535                    3,535
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                   20,093                   20,093
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................                  590,559                  590,559
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                   28,639                   28,639
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                   14,546                   14,546
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                   43,185                   43,185
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                    5,214                    5,214
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                   23,903                   23,903
                         ROTATIONAL TRAVEL....................                   30,110                   30,110
                         SEPARATION TRAVEL....................                    3,132                    3,132
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                   62,359                   62,359
 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                    3,800                    3,800
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                   29,662                   29,662
                         SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS...........                   51,111                   51,111
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                   84,573                   84,573
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                  130,000
                         Higher than Budgeted Mobilization      .......................                 +110,000
                          Levels.
                         Increased Deployment Levels..........  .......................                  +20,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY......                1,178,719                1,308,719
 
                                        MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                   40,079                   40,079
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                   13,308                   13,308
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                   18,565                   18,565
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                    1,760                    1,760
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   10,747                   10,747
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                    4,805                    4,805
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                    4,176                    4,176
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                   93,440                   93,440
 
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                  190,013                  190,013
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                   43,090                   43,090
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                   45,977                   45,977
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   95,395                   95,395
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                   40,431                   40,431
                         SEPARATION PAY.......................                    3,017                    3,017
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                   13,435                   13,435
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................                  431,358                  431,358
 
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                   21,420                   21,420
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                   21,420                   21,420
 
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         ACCESSION TRAVEL.....................                    3,270                    3,270
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                    3,270                    3,270
 
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                   27,000                   27,000
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                   19,942                   19,942
                         SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS...........                   48,345                   48,345
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                   95,287                   95,287
 
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                   88,145
                         Over Budgeted End Strength...........  .......................                  +88,145
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE                      644,775                  732,920
                          CORPS.
 
                                          MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
 
                         BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS.  .......................  .......................
                         BASIC PAY............................                  188,334                  188,334
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                   45,953                   45,953
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                   58,889                   58,889
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                    7,320                    7,320
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   13,613                   13,613
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                    5,760                    5,760
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                   14,408                   14,408
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                  334,277                  334,277
                         BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED   .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC PAY............................                  472,896                  472,896
                         RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL..................                  115,387                  115,387
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING..........                  177,545                  177,545
                         SPECIAL PAYS.........................                   49,964                   49,964
                         ALLOWANCES...........................                   16,254                   16,254
                         SOCIAL SECURITY TAX..................                   36,177                   36,177
                         TOTAL, BA-2..........................                  868,223                  868,223
                         BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED          .......................  .......................
                          PERSONNEL.
                         BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE......                   39,090                   39,090
                         SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND..................                   61,805                   61,805
                         TOTAL, BA-4..........................                  100,895                  100,895
                         BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION      .......................  .......................
                          TRAVEL.
                         OPERATIONAL TRAVEL...................                    5,957                    5,957
                         TOTAL, BA-5..........................                    5,957                    5,957
                         BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS.  .......................  .......................
                         DEATH GRATUITIES.....................                    2,000                    2,000
                         UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................                   27,978                   27,978
                         SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS...........                   67,057                   67,057
                         TOTAL, BA-6..........................                   97,035                   97,035
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                  654,055
                         Higher than Budgeted Mobilization      .......................                 +378,000
                          Levels.
                         Over Budgeted End Strength...........  .......................                 +276,055
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE.                1,406,387                2,060,442
 
                                             RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY
 
                         BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING...  .......................  .......................
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                      104,230                  104,230
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                    9,886                    9,886
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                  153,915                  153,915
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                  268,031                  268,031
                                                               -------------------------------------------------

[[Page 1905]]

 
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY.......                  268,031                  268,031
 
                                             RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY
 
                         BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING...  .......................  .......................
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                    7,019                    7,019
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                   38,683                   38,683
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                    3,210                    3,210
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                   48,912                   48,912
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY.......                   48,912                   48,912
 
                                         RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
 
                         BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING...  .......................  .......................
                         SCHOOL TRAINING......................                    5,467                    5,467
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                   24,797                   24,797
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                      373                      373
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                   30,637                   30,637
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                   14,800
                         Over Budgeted End Strength...........  .......................                  +14,800
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE                        30,637                   45,437
                          CORPS.
 
                                          RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
 
                         BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING...  .......................  .......................
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                   27,002                   27,002
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                   27,002                   27,002
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE..                   27,002                   27,002
 
                                         NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY
 
                         BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING...  .......................  .......................
                         PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and                      231,547                  231,547
                          DRILLS 24/48).
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                  550,090                  550,090
                         ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT...........                   46,485                   46,485
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                  828,122                  828,122
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                   24,900
                         Support to Southwest Border..........  .......................                  +24,900
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY                  828,122                  853,022
 
                                       NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
 
                         BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING...  .......................  .......................
                         SPECIAL TRAINING.....................                   21,060                   11,060
                         Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -10,000
                         TOTAL, BA-1..........................                   21,060                   11,060
                         UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT.............  .......................                    5,800
                         Support to Southwest Border..........  .......................                   +5,800
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR                    21,060                   16,860
                          FORCE.
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL............               15,132,054               16,829,378
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          O-1                                                            Budget               Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY
 
131....................  BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT..............                        0                1,000,000
                         Increased Peacetime Base Operations    .......................               +1,000,000
                          Support Costs to Redeployment of
                          Soldiers from Iraq.
135....................  ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES................               47,638,208               44,608,615
                         Reduced Deployment Level.............  .......................               -2,500,000
                         Transfer to SAG 421 for Subsistence    .......................               -1,013,000
                          Transportation Costs.
                         Transfer from Overseas Contingency     .......................                  +80,000
                          Operations Transfer Fund for
                          Detainee Operations.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Synchronization  .......................                   +3,200
                          and Integration WTI Cell.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Thermal Station  .......................                  +13,000
                          (National IED Exploitation Facility
                          (NIEF)).
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Beachcomber....  .......................                   +3,000
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Counter Bomber.  .......................                   +1,500
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--CREW-SSM         .......................                   +3,000
                          Universal Test Set.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Subtle Magnetic  .......................                   +1,000
                          Anomaly Detection Network Systems.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Technical        .......................                  +16,400
                          Collection Training Program.
                         Transfer from Title II--Chemical       .......................                   +8,579
                          Defense Equipment Sustainment.
                         Transfer from Title II--MRAP Vehicle   .......................                   +6,420
                          Sustainment at Combat Training
                          Centers.
                         Transfer from Title II--Body Armor     .......................                  +71,660
                          Sustainment.
                         Transfer from Title II--Rapid          .......................                   +9,294
                          Equipping Force Readiness.
                         Transfer from Title II--Fixed Wing     .......................                  +21,171
                          Life Cycle Contract Support.
                         Transfer from Title II--Overseas       .......................                 +200,000
                          Security Guards.
                         Transfer from Title II--Senior Leader  .......................                  +30,000
                          Initiative-- Comprehensive Soldier
                          Fitness Program.
                         Transfer from Title II--Survivability  .......................                  +15,183
                          and Maneuverability Training.
136....................  COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM                1,300,000                  500,000
                         Program reduction....................  .......................                 -400,000
                         Transfer to Afghanistan                .......................                 -400,000
                          Infrastructure Fund.
137....................  RESET................................                7,840,211                6,261,568
                         Army-Identified Excess Reset           .......................               -1,578,643
                          Requirement.
411....................  SECURITY PROGRAMS....................                2,358,865                2,364,265
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Air Vigilance..  .......................                   +5,400
421....................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                3,465,334                4,478,334
                         Transfer from SAG 135 for Subsistence  .......................               +1,013,000
                          Transportation Costs.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                   62,602,618               59,212,782
                          ARMY.
 
                                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY
 
1A1A...................  MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS..                1,839,918                1,839,918
1A2A...................  FLEET AIR TRAINING...................                    3,453                    3,453
1A3A...................  AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING                    1,400                    1,400
                          SVCS.
1A4A...................  AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT....                   26,837                   26,837
1A4N...................  AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT..................                   44,567                   44,567
1A5A...................  AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE...........                  233,114                  281,114
                         Aircraft Depot Maintenance Increase..  .......................                  +48,000
1B1B...................  MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS....                1,151,465                1,151,465
1B2B...................  SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING...                   27,472                   27,472
1B4B...................  SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE...............                1,266,556                1,290,556
                         Ship Depot Maintenance Increase......  .......................                  +24,000
1C1C...................  COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................                   38,468                   38,468
1C4C...................  WARFARE TACTICS......................                   82,801                   32,801
                         Navy Identified Excess to Requirement  .......................                  -50,000
                          for CENTCOM Operations.
1C5C...................  OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND                             24,855                   24,855
                          OCEANOGRAPHY.
1C6C...................  COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................                2,737,727                2,930,528
                         Transfer from Title II--Naval          .......................                 +192,801
                          Expeditionary Combat Command
                          Increases.

[[Page 1906]]

 
1C7C...................  EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................                    3,677                    3,677
1CCH...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS.                    7,000                    7,000
1CCM...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION                      7,455                    7,455
                          SUPPORT.
1D3D...................  IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT...                   99,118                  100,118
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--CREW-SSM         .......................                   +1,000
                          Universal Test Set.
1D4D...................  WEAPONS MAINTENANCE..................                   82,519                   82,519
1D7D...................  OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.........                   16,938                   16,938
BSIT...................  ENTERPRISE INFORMATION...............                   10,350                        0
                         ONE-NET Baseline Budget Requirement..  .......................                  -10,350
BSM1...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                   28,250                   49,250
                          MODERNIZATION.
                         Continuing Operations at Guantanamo    .......................                  +21,000
                          Bay--Transfer from Overseas
                          Contingency Operations Transfer Fund.
BSS1...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                  381,749                  436,249
                         Continuing Operations at Guantanamo    .......................                   +4,000
                          Bay--Transfer from Overseas
                          Contingency Operations Transfer Fund.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Counter Bomber.  .......................                     +500
                         Transfer from Title II--Regional/      .......................                  +50,000
                          Emergency Operations Center.
2A1F...................  SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE........                   27,300                   27,300
2C1H...................  FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM...............                    4,400                    4,400
2C3H...................  COAST GUARD SUPPORT..................                  254,461                        0
                         Transfer to Department of Homeland     .......................                 -254,461
                          Security.
3B1K...................  SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING...........                   81,454                   84,454
                         Transfer from Title II--NAVSEA VSSS/   .......................                   +3,000
                          EOD Training.
3B4K...................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                    5,400                        0
                         Training Support Baseline Budget       .......................                   -5,400
                          Requirement.
4A1M...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                    4,265                    4,265
4A2M...................  EXTERNAL RELATIONS...................                      467                      467
4A3M...................  CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL                            450                      450
                          MANAGEMENT.
4A4M...................  MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL                         11,214                   11,214
                          MANAGEMENT.
4A5M...................  OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT..............                    2,706                    2,706
4A6M...................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                   28,671                   28,671
4B1N...................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                  300,868                  300,868
4B3N...................  ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT...                    6,091                    6,091
4B7N...................  SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS.                    2,153                    2,153
4C1P...................  NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE..........                   78,464                   78,464
9999...................  OTHER PROGRAMS.......................                   22,581                   22,581
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    8,946,634                8,970,724
                          NAVY.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
 
1A1A...................  OPERATIONAL FORCES...................                2,448,572                2,317,572
                         Excess to Requirement for Cargo UAS..  .......................                  -90,400
                         Transfer to RDTE,N for Cargo UAS.....  .......................                  -36,000
                         Transfer to OP,N for AM-2 Matting....  .......................                   -4,600
1A2A...................  FIELD LOGISTICS......................                  514,748                  517,248
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Counter Bomber.  .......................                   +1,000
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--CREW-SSM         .......................                   +1,000
                          Universal Test Set.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Subtle Magnetic  .......................                     +500
                          Anomaly Detection Network Systems.
1A3A...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  523,250                  523,250
1B1B...................  MARITIME PREPOSITIONING..............                    7,808                    7,808
BSS1...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                   55,301                   55,301
3B4D...................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                  223,071                  223,071
4A3G...................  SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION...........                  360,000                  360,000
4A4G...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                    3,772                    3,772
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    4,136,522                4,008,022
                          MARINE CORPS.
 
                                      OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
 
011A...................  PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES................                1,896,647                1,896,647
011C...................  COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES............                1,954,759                1,954,759
011D...................  AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING..............                  113,948                  113,948
011M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  297,623                  399,983
                         Weapons System Sustainment...........  .......................                 +102,360
011R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                  704,463                  504,463
                          MODERNIZATION.
                           Unjustified Growth from fiscal year  .......................                 -200,000
                          2010 Baseline.
011Z...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                1,780,052                1,780,052
012A...................  GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING.........                  128,632                  128,632
012C...................  OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS........                  397,894                  397,894
013A...................  LAUNCH FACILITIES....................                   28,975                   28,975
013C...................  SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS................                   34,091                   34,091
015A...................  COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION                    127,861                  127,861
                          SUPPORT.
021A...................  AIRLIFT OPERATIONS...................                4,403,800                4,403,800
021D...................  MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS............                  240,394                  240,394
021M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  217,023                  217,023
021R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                   20,360                   20,360
                          MODERNIZATION.
021Z...................  BASE SUPPORT.........................                   57,362                   57,362
031R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                    1,948                    1,948
                          MODERNIZATION.
031Z...................  BASE SUPPORT.........................                    6,088                    6,088
032A...................  SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING...........                   45,893                   45,893
032B...................  FLIGHT TRAINING......................                   20,277                   20,277
032C...................  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION...                    1,500                    1,500
032D...................  TRAINING SUPPORT.....................                    1,820                    1,820
041A...................  LOGISTICS OPERATIONS.................                  292,030                  292,030
041R...................  FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION &                   10,500                   10,500
                          MODERNIZATION.
041Z...................  BASE SUPPORT.........................                   31,985                   31,985
042A...................  ADMINISTRATION.......................                    5,438                    5,438
042B...................  SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS...........                  247,149                  247,149
042G...................  OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES.........                  113,082                  113,082
043A...................  SECURITY PROGRAMS....................                  305,689                  305,689
                         REDUCED DEPLOYMENT LEVELS............  .......................                 -400,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR               13,487,283               12,989,643
                          FORCE.
 
                                      OPERATION AND MAINTENCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
 
1PL1...................  JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF................                   20,500                   20,500
1PL2...................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND...........                3,012,026                2,903,126
                         Information Operations...............  .......................                  -49,400
                         Leased Aircraft--Unjustified Request.  .......................                  -65,500
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Wolfhound II...  .......................                   +6,000
ES18...................  DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY...............                   14,799                   14,799
4GT6...................  DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY........                   27,000                   27,000
4GT9...................  DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY...                  136,316                  144,316
                         Increase Afghanistan FOB Fiber         .......................                   +8,000
                          Connectivity.
4GTJ...................  DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY...                   74,862                   74,862
4GTA...................  DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY........                  120,469                  116,969
                         Overstatement of Habeas Corpus         .......................                   -3,500
                          Civilian Personnel Pricing.
4GTJ...................  DEFENSE DEPENDENTS EDUCATION.........                  485,769                  501,769
                         Additional Funding for Outreach and    .......................                  +16,000
                          Reintegration Services Under the
                          Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program.
4GTD...................  DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY..                2,000,000                2,000,000
4GTI...................  DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY......                    1,218                    1,218
4GTN...................  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE...                  188,099                  173,099
                         Knowledge Management.................  .......................                  -15,000

[[Page 1907]]

 
9999...................  OTHER PROGRAMS.......................                3,345,300                3,299,332
                         Classified Adjustments...............  .......................                  -49,168
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Synchronization  .......................                   +3,200
                          and Integration WTI Cell.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                    9,426,358                9,276,990
                          DEFENSE-WIDE.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE
 
135....................  ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES................                  286,950                  206,784
                         Army Reserve Identified Excess to      .......................                  -80,166
                          Requirement.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                      286,950                  206,784
                          ARMY RESERVE.
 
                                     OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE
 
1A1A...................  MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS..                   49,089                   49,089
1A3A...................  INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE.............                      400                      400
1A5A...................  AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE...........                   17,760                   17,760
1B1B...................  MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS....                    9,395                    9,395
1B4B...................  SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE...............                      497                      497
1C1C...................  COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................                    3,185                    3,185
1C6C...................  COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................                   12,169                   12,169
4A4M...................  MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL                          1,064                    1,064
                          MANAGEMENT.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                       93,559                   93,559
                          NAVY RESERVE.
 
                                 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE
 
1A1A...................  OPERATING FORCES.....................                   23,571                   23,571
BSS1...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                    6,114                    6,114
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                       29,685                   29,685
                          MARINE CORPS RESERVE.
 
                                  OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE
 
011M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  116,924                  191,124
                         Weapons System Sustainment...........  .......................                  +74,200
011Z...................  BASE OPERATING SUPPORT...............                   12,683                   12,683
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR                  129,607                  203,807
                          FORCE RESERVE.
 
                                 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
 
135....................  ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES................                  544,349                  497,849
                         Distance Learning--Transfer to         .......................                   -9,000
                          Baseline OM,ARNG SAG 121.
                         Air OPTEMPO Duplicate Request........  .......................                  -44,000
                         Support to Southwest Border..........  .......................                   +6,500
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,                      544,349                  497,849
                          ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.
 
                                  OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD
 
011F...................  AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS..................                  152,896                  152,896
011G...................  MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS...........                   57,800                   59,400
                         Support to Southwest Border..........  .......................                   +1,600
011M...................  DEPOT MAINTENANCE....................                  140,127                  205,687
                         Weapons System Sustainment...........  .......................                  +65,560
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR                  350,823                  417,983
                          NATIONAL GUARD.
 
                                  OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND
 
                         OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS                      1,551,781                        0
                          TRANSFER FUND.
                         Transfer to OM,A SAG 135.............  .......................                  -80,000
                         Transfer to OM,N SAGs BSS1 and BSM1..  .......................                  -25,000
                         Unjustified Program Change...........  .......................               -1,446,781
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY                          1,551,781                        0
                          OPERATIONS TRANSFER ACCOUNT.
 
                                         AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
 
                         Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund--      .......................                 +400,000
                          Transfer from CERP.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN INFRASTUCTURE FUND                        0                  400,000
 
                                        AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND
 
                         Afghan National Army.................                7,467,014                7,467,014
                         Infrastructure.......................                1,790,933                1,790,933
                         Equipment and Transportation.........                1,846,623                1,846,623
                         Training and Operations..............                  836,842                  836,842
                         Sustainment..........................                2,992,616                2,992,616
                         Afghan National Police...............                4,085,437                4,085,437
                         Infrastructure.......................                1,078,413                1,078,413
                         Equipment and Transportation.........                  917,966                  917,966
                         Training and Operations..............                  990,213                  990,213
                         Sustainment..........................                1,098,845                1,098,845
                         Related Activities...................                   66,832                   66,832
                         Detainee Operations--Sustainment.....                    6,037                    6,037
                         Detainee Operations--Training and                        1,530                    1,530
                          Operations.
                         Detainee Operations--Infrastructure..                   58,265                   58,265
                         COIN Activities......................                    1,000                    1,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES                  11,619,283               11,619,283
                          FUND.
 
                                            IRAQ SECURITY FORCES FUND
 
                         Defense Security Forces..............                1,656,906                1,656,906
                         Equipment and Transportation.........                1,067,706                1,067,706
                         Training.............................                  248,075                  248,075
                         Sustainment..........................                  341,125                  341,125
                         Interior Security Forces.............                  268,094                  268,094
                         Equipment and Transportation.........                  220,469                  220,469
                         Sustainment..........................                   47,625                   47,625
                         Related Activities...................                   75,000                   75,000
                         Authorization Reduction..............  .......................                 -500,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, IRAQ SECURITY FORCES FUND.....                2,000,000                1,500,000
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.....              115,205,452            1,109,427,111
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          P-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                           AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
 
2......................  C-12 CARGO AIRPLANE (OCO)............                   78,060                   78,060
4......................  MQ-1 UAV (OCO).......................                   47,000                   24,000
  .....................  Reduction to Projected Battle Losses.  .......................                  -23,000
5......................  RQ-11 (RAVEN) (OCO)..................                   17,430                   17,430
9......................  AH-64 APACHE BLOCK III...............  .......................                   34,600

[[Page 1908]]

 
                         War Replacement Aircraft.............  .......................                  +34,600
11.....................  UH-60 BLACKHAWK (OCO)................                   40,500                  373,400
  .....................  Program Increase for Army National     .......................                  +80,000
                          Guard.
  .....................  Three Combat Loss UH-60..............  .......................                  +52,500
  .....................  Accelerate 12 Aircraft...............  .......................                 +200,400
13.....................  CH-47 HELICOPTER (OCO)...............                   70,600                  258,400
  .....................  Accelerate Six Aircraft..............  .......................                 +187,800
16.....................  C12 AIRCRAFT MODS (OCO)..............                  122,340                  122,340
17.....................  MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS (OCO)..............                    3,600                    3,600
19.....................  GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) (OCO)...........                   30,200                    6,000
  .....................  Authorization Adjustment.............  .......................                  -24,200
20.....................  MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) (OCO)...                   86,200                   86,200
21.....................  AH-64 MODS (OCO).....................                  199,200                  654,200
  .....................  AH-64A to AH-64D Conversion for the    .......................                 +455,000
                          Texas and Mississippi National Guard.
23.....................  CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (OCO)....                   82,900                   66,900
  .....................  Cargo On/Off Loading System (COOLS)    .......................                  -16,000
                          ahead of need.
27.....................  UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS (OCO)........                   14,530                   14,530
28.....................  KIOWA WARRIOR (OCO)..................                  187,288                  160,378
  .....................  Fielded Fleet Upgrades...............  .......................                  +20,000
  .....................  Limit Ramp Rate on Replacement         .......................                  -46,910
                          Aircraft.
29.....................  AIRBORNE AVIONICS (OCO)..............                   24,983                   24,983
31.....................  RQ-7 UAV MODS (OCO)..................                   97,800                  546,500
  .....................  Funding Ahead of Need................  .......................                   -1,000
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +497,500
  .....................  Ahead of Need........................  .......................                  -47,800
36.....................  ASE INFRARED CM (OCO)................                  197,990                  182,990
  .....................  Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -15,000
38.....................  COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT (OCO)........                   65,627                   65,627
40.....................  AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (OCO)............                    7,555                        0
  .....................  Unjustified Request..................  .......................                   -7,555
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY....                1,373,803                2,720,138
 
                                            MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
 
4......................  HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY (OCO)...........                  190,459                  190,459
6......................  TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (OCO)...........                  112,769                  112,769
13.....................  ITAS/TOW MODS (OCO)..................                   40,600                   40,600
 
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY.....                  343,828                  343,828
 
                                           PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
 
4......................  STRYKER VEHICLE (OCO)................  .......................                  545,000
  .....................  Transfer from Stryker Modifications,   .......................                 +445,000
                          line 9.
  .....................  Increase for Stryker Double V Hull...  .......................                 +100,000
9......................  STRYKER VEHICLE MODS (OCO)...........                  445,000                        0
  .....................  Transfer to Stryker Vehicle, line 4..  .......................                 -445,000
22.....................  MACHINE GUN, CAL .50, M2 ROLL........  .......................                   79,496
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                  +79,496
26.....................  MORTAR SYSTEMS (OCO).................                    8,600                    8,600
28.....................  XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (OCO)..                   22,500                   22,500
32.....................  COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS                       100,000                  100,000
                          STATION (OCO).
34.....................  HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) (OCO).......                   62,000                   62,000
36.....................  M4 CARBINE MODS (OCO)................                   12,900                   42,900
  .....................  Program Increase.....................  .......................                  +30,000
37.....................  M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS (OCO).....                   15,000                   15,000
40.....................  M119 MODIFICATIONS (OCO).............                   21,500                   21,500
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY....                  687,500                  896,996
 
                                         PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
 
2......................  CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES (OCO).........                   32,604                   13,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -19,604
4......................  CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES (OCO)........                  128,876                   47,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -81,876
5......................  CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)...........                   20,056                   10,500
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                   -9,556
7......................  CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)...........                   23,826                    9,500
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -14,326
8......................  CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)...........                   62,700                   25,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -37,700
11.....................  120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES (OCO)........                  120,160                   26,900
  .....................  APMI Unit Cost Savings...............  .......................                  -50,100
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -43,160
15.....................  CTG, ARTY, 105MM: ALL TYPES (OCO)....                   37,620                   15,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -22,620
16.....................  CTG, ARTY, 155MM: ALL TYPES (OCO)....                   37,620                   15,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -22,620
18.....................  MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGE SYS, ALL                       15,048                    6,000
                          TYPES (OCO).
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                   -9,048
19.....................  ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES (OCO).....                   12,540                    5,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                   -7,540
24.....................  SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, AL TYPES                   17,556                        0
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -17,556
25.....................  ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES (OCO)....                  139,285                  139,285
26.....................  DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES (OCO)  .......................                   20,000
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  +20,000
27.....................  GRENADES, ALL TYPES (OCO)............                    2,000                        0
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                   -2,000
31.....................  NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES                        15,000                        0
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Per Army Request.....................  .......................                  -15,000
40.....................  CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS                                  37,700                   37,700
                          DEMILITARIZATION, ALL TYPES (OCO).
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION,                      702,591                  369,885
                          ARMY.
 
                                             OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
 
5......................  FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)                   516,350                  398,925
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Battle Loss Replacement..............  .......................                   +8,875
  .....................  Contract Savings.....................  .......................                 -126,300
7......................  FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES                      188,677                  199,809
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Battle Loss Replacement..............  .......................                  +11,132
9......................  ARMORED SECURITY VEHICLES (ASV) (OCO)                   52,780                   52,780
10.....................  MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY (OCO).                  136,700                  367,678
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +230,978
14.....................  HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM (OCO).                  989,067                  989,067
15.....................  MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP (OCO)...                   20,000                  312,956
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +292,956
24.....................  WIN-T-GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK                     8,163                    8,163
                          (OCO).
27.....................  SHF TERM (OCO).......................                   62,415                   62,415
29.....................  NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM                       13,500                   63,500
                          (OCO).

[[Page 1909]]

 
  .....................  Additional DAGRs.....................  .......................                  +50,000
40.....................  AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--OPA2 (OCO).......                    3,946                    3,946
47.....................  RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY                        78,253                   78,253
                          (OCO).
48.....................  MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE                      15,000                   15,000
                          (OCO).
51x....................  FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS.................  .......................                   38,172
  .....................  Non-MIP Biometrics--Transfer from      .......................                  +38,172
                          RDTE,A line 171.
53.....................  BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS (OCO)....                   70,000                   47,500
  .....................  Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -22,500
55.....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS (OCO)............  .......................                   55,000
  .....................  Program Adjustment for Tactical Local  .......................                  +55,000
                          Area Network (TACLAN).
57.....................  INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD                   413,200                  413,200
                          (OCO).
65.....................  PROPHET GROUND (OCO).................                   18,900                   18,900
70.....................  DCGS-A (MIP) (OCO)...................                  197,092                  334,516
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +137,424
74.....................  CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL                        52,277                   47,377
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Excess to Need.......................  .......................                   -4,900
75.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP) (OCO)....                    5,400                    5,400
76.....................  LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR                        25,000                   10,000
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Program Decrease.....................  .......................                  -15,000
77.....................  WARLOCK (OCO)........................                  225,682                  225,682
79.....................  COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY                           455,639                  455,639
                          COUNTERMEASURES (OCO).
81.....................  FAAD GBS (OCO).......................                  167,460                  167,460
84.....................  NIGHT VISION DEVICES (OCO)...........                    5,019                    5,019
89.....................  COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C-                 291,400                  251,200
                          RAM) (OCO).
  .....................  Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -40,200
90.....................  BASE EXPEDITIONARY TARGETING & SURV                    486,050                  408,050
                          SYS (OCO).
  .....................  Program Decrease.....................  .......................                  -78,000
95.....................  MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER                         69,800                   69,800
                          RADARS) (OCO).
96.....................  FORCE XXI BATTLE CMD BRIGADE & BELOW                   135,500                  135,500
                          (OCO).
98.....................  LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/                           22,371                   22,371
                          RANGEFINDER.
99.....................  COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 (OCO)                    1,800                    1,800
101....................  COUNTERFIRE RADARS (OCO).............                   20,000                  285,867
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +275,867
  .....................  Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -10,000
103....................  TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS (OCO)....                   43,800                   43,800
104....................  FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY (OCO).........                      566                   13,566
  .....................  Advanced Field Artillery Tactical      .......................                  +13,000
                          Data System.
105....................  BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT                         420                      420
                          SYS.
108....................  KNIGHT FAMILY (OCO)..................                   49,744                   49,744
110....................  AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY                      2,222                    2,222
                          (OCO).
114....................  NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION &                      5,000                    5,000
                          SERVICE (OCO).
115....................  MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (OCO)........                   60,111                   60,111
121....................  AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP (OCO)                   10,500                   10,500
130....................  PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS (OCO).............                    5,690                    5,690
135....................  TACTICAL BRIDGING, FLOAT RIBBON (OCO)                    3,220                    3,220
136....................  HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION                        0                   28,000
                          SYSTEM.
  .....................  Transfer from JIEDDO for Proper        .......................                  +28,000
                          Execution.
137....................  GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM                    191,000                  191,000
                          (OCO).
141....................  HEATERS AND ECU'S (OCO)..............                    8,708                    8,708
149....................  FORCE PROVIDER (OCO).................                  261,599                   52,499
  .....................  Excess to Need.......................  .......................                 -209,100
150....................  FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT (OCO)........                   29,903                   29,903
154....................  DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM &                       55,105                   55,105
                          WATER (OCO).
155....................  WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS (OCO).....                   12,086                        0
  .....................  Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                  -12,086
156....................  COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL (OCO).........                    8,680                    8,680
157....................  MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS                    41,398                   41,398
                          (OCO).
159....................  GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)                        3,390                    3,390
                          (OCO).
161....................  SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING (OCO)..........                    3,195                    3,195
164....................  LOADERS (OCO)........................                    1,157                    1,157
168....................  HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR FOS                     3,750                    3,750
                          (OCO).
170....................  ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)                      4,140                    4,140
                          (OCO).
174....................  GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP (OCO)                   37,480                   37,480
175....................  ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (OCO)                    4,562                    4,562
177....................  ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM (OCO)                   56,609                   58,049
  .....................  Battle Loss Replacement..............  .......................                   +1,440
179....................  TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM (OCO)....                   28,624                   28,624
180....................  CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER (OCO)..                    8,200                        0
  .....................  Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -8,200
184....................  INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT                        622                      622
                          (OCO).
186....................  RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPT                            58,590                   38,590
                          EQUIPMENT (OCO).
  .....................  Excess to Need.......................  .......................                  -20,000
187....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)                        77,000                   77,000
                          (OCO).
192....................  SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING                       1,987                    1,987
                          (OCO).
  .....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS (OCO)............                      775                      775
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY.......                5,827,274                6,423,832
 
                                           AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
3......................  F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP).....  .......................                  495,000
  .....................  Strike Fighter Shortfall Mitigation -  .......................                 +495,000
                          Nine Aircraft.
11.....................  UH-1Y/AH-1Z (OCO)....................                   88,500                   88,500
19.....................  E-2C (EARLY WARNING) HAWKEYE (MYP)...  .......................                  175,000
  .....................  Program Increase - Combat Loss         .......................                 +175,000
                          Replacement.
29.....................  EA-6 SERIES (OCO)....................                   15,000                   12,700
  .....................  Install Equipment Program Adjustment.  .......................                   -2,300
31.....................  AV-8 SERIES (OCO)....................                   72,100                   65,371
  .....................  Pod Upgrade Kits Cost Growth.........  .......................                   -1,529
  .....................  GEN4 Pod Cost Growth.................  .......................                   -5,200
32.....................  F-18 SERIES (OCO)....................                   43,250                   43,250
34.....................  AH-1W SERIES (OCO)...................                   35,510                   35,510
35.....................  H-53 SERIES (OCO)....................                   36,248                   27,148
  .....................  Funded Ahead of Need.................  .......................                   -9,100
36.....................  SH-60 SERIES (OCO)...................                    6,430                    6,430
39.....................  P-3 SERIES (OCO).....................                    6,000                    6,000
48.....................  SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT (OCO).......                    6,100                    6,100
53.....................  COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT (OCO)...........                   38,700                   31,020
  .....................  Directed Infrared Countermeasures      .......................                   -7,680
                          Installation Kit Cost Growth.
54.....................  COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES (OCO)........                   14,100                   14,100
55.....................  COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM (OCO).                   10,500                   10,500
57.....................  RQ-7 SERIES (OCO)....................                    8,000                    8,000
58.....................  V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY (OCO)..                   36,420                   36,420
59.....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (OCO)........                    3,500                  208,500
  .....................  Aviation Spares......................  .......................                 +205,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY....                  420,358                1,269,549
 
                                            WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
 
5......................  SIDEWINDER (OCO).....................                    2,923                        0
  .....................  Non-combat Expenditures..............  .......................                   -2,923

[[Page 1910]]

 
9......................  HELLFIRE (OCO).......................                   85,504                   85,504
26.....................  SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS (OCO).........                    4,998                    4,998
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY.....                   93,425                   90,502
 
                                    PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS
 
1......................  GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS (OCO)..........                    6,060                        0
  .....................  Contract Delay.......................  .......................                   -6,060
3......................  AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES (OCO)....                   76,043                   76,043
4......................  MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION (OCO).........                   69,660                   68,660
  .....................  20mm Linked TP, PGU-27 Cost Growth...  .......................                   -1,000
7......................  AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES (OCO).                   33,632                   33,632
11.....................  OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION (OCO)......                      455                      455
12.....................  SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO (OCO)                    7,757                    7,757
13.....................  PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION (OCO).....                    1,209                    1,209
15.....................  SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION (OCO)..........                   19,498                   19,498
16.....................  LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES (OCO)......                    4,677                    4,677
17.....................  40 MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)...............                   11,307                   11,307
18.....................  60MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)................                   17,150                   17,150
19.....................  81MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)................                   27,738                   27,738
20.....................  120MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)...............                   96,895                   96,895
21.....................  CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)............                      990                      990
22.....................  GRENADES, ALL TYPES (OCO)............                    6,137                    6,137
23.....................  ROCKETS, ALL TYPES (OCO).............                   13,543                   13,543
24.....................  ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES (OCO)...........                  137,118                  137,118
25.....................  DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES (OCO)                    9,296                    9,296
26.....................  FUZE, ALL TYPES (OCO)................                   25,888                   25,888
27.....................  NON LETHALS (OCO)....................                       31                       31
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY &                     565,084                  558,024
                          MARINE CORPS.
 
                                             OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
 
25.....................  STANDARD BOATS (OCO).................                   30,706                   23,706
  .....................  Riverine Patrol Boats - Unjustified    .......................                   -7,000
                          Request.
57.....................  MATCALS (OCO)........................                   27,080                   25,080
  .....................  ASPARCS - Unjustified Cost Growth....  .......................                   -2,000
74.....................  EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION (OCO)....                    1,800                    1,800
94.....................  EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS (OCO)........                        0                    4,600
  .....................  AM-2 Matting Expeditionary Airfield -  .......................                   +4,600
                          Requested Transfer from OM,MC.
99.....................  AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT (OCO)..........                   26,024                   10,024
  .....................  CSEL Excess to Need..................  .......................                  -16,000
117....................  EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP                      132,386                   10,386
                          (OCO).
  .....................  JCREW - Funding No Longer Required...  .......................                 -122,000
122....................  PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES (OCO)....                    1,234                    1,234
123....................  GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS (OCO).........                      420                      420
124....................  CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP                        55,474                   41,474
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Contract Delays......................  .......................                  -14,000
126....................  TACTICAL VEHICLES (OCO)..............                   91,802                   91,802
129....................  ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (OCO).........                   26,016                   26,016
131....................  MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT (OCO)...                   33,659                   33,659
137....................  COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (OCO)......                    2,775                    2,775
146....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT (OCO)....                   46,417                   38,917
  .....................  ATFP Afloat--Ahead of Need...........  .......................                   -7,500
149....................  SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (OCO)........                    4,942                    4,942
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY.......                  480,735                  316,835
 
                                            PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
 
2......................  LAV PIP (OCO)........................                  152,333                   37,573
  .....................  Baseline Budget Requirement..........  .......................                 -114,760
5......................  155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER                       103,600                  103,600
                          (OCO).
6......................  HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM                  145,533                  145,533
                          (OCO).
7......................  WEAPONS & COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 M                     7,329                    7,329
                          (OCO).
9......................  MODIFICATION KITS (OCO)..............                   12,000                   12,000
10.....................  WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (OCO)....                   18,571                   18,571
16.....................  UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER (OCO).........                  112,424                  112,424
17.....................  REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT (OCO)......                   15,962                   38,762
  .....................  OCO Shortfall--ETMS and Obsolescence   .......................                  +22,800
                          Upgrades.
19.....................  MODIFICATION KITS (OCO)..............                   18,545                    3,345
  .....................  Unexecutable Funding--CESAS..........  .......................                  -15,200
20.....................  ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)                    11,549                   11,549
                          (OCO).
21.....................  AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS (OCO)......                   41,031                   41,031
22.....................  RADAR SYSTEMS (OCO)..................                    5,493                   10,993
  .....................  OCO Shortfall--TPS-59................  .......................                   +5,500
23.....................  FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM (OCO)............                    4,710                    4,710
24.....................  INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (OCO).                   82,897                   82,897
26.....................  DCGS-MC (OCO)........................                   21,789                   21,789
28.....................  COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES (OCO)......                   29,412                   29,412
29.....................  COMMAND POST SYSTEMS (OCO)...........                   36,256                   36,256
30.....................  RADIO SYSTEMS (OCO)..................                  155,545                  110,545
  .....................  E-LMR--Not an OCO Requirement........  .......................                  -45,000
31.....................  COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS                        63,280                   28,280
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Previously Funded UUNS...............  .......................                  -35,000
35.....................  5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) (OCO).........                   12,994                        0
  .....................  Service Requested Reduction..........  .......................                  -12,994
37.....................  MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT                     80,559                   80,559
                          (OCO).
38.....................  LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REP (OCO)...                  109,100                  109,100
39.....................  FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS (OCO)....                   22,130                   22,130
42.....................  ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT                      17,799                   27,399
                          (OCO).
  .....................  OCO Shortfall--ECU and SFRS..........  .......................                   +9,600
43.....................  BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT (OCO)..........                    1,628                   16,758
  .....................  OCO Shortfall--Tank and Pump Modules.  .......................                  +15,130
44.....................  TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS (OCO)..........                   83,698                   89,498
  .....................  OCO Shortfall--Liquid Fuel Storage...  .......................                   +5,800
45.....................  POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED (OCO).......                   41,536                   41,536
47.....................  EOD SYSTEMS (OCO)....................                  213,985                  188,985
  .....................  Excess to Requirement................  .......................                  -25,000
48.....................  PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT (OCO)....                    5,200                    5,200
50.....................  MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP (OCO)........                   58,264                   58,264
53.....................  TRAINING DEVICES (OCO)...............                   55,864                   55,864
54.....................  CONTAINER FAMILY (OCO)...............                    8,826                    8,826
56.....................  FAMILY OF INTERNALLY TRANSPORTABLE                      28,401                   28,401
                          VEHICLE (OCO).
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS.....                1,778,243                1,589,119
 
                                         AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
 
1......................  F-35 (OCO)...........................                  204,900                        0
  .....................  Unjustified Request..................  .......................                 -204,900
19.....................  CV-22 (OCO)..........................  .......................                   70,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Provides for One     .......................                  +70,000
                          Additional Combat Loss Aircraft.

[[Page 1911]]

 
25.....................  HH-60M OPERATIONAL LOSS REPLACEMENT                    114,000                  417,400
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Program Increase (Adds 10 Aircraft,    .......................                 +303,400
                          Not Less Than Four for the Air
                          National Guard).
26.....................  RQ-11 (OCO)..........................                    9,380                    9,380
34.....................  MQ-9 (OCO)...........................                  216,000                  376,814
  .....................  Spares...............................  .......................                  -55,186
  .....................  Transfer 12 Aircraft from Title III..  .......................                 +216,000
37.....................  B-1B (OCO)...........................                    8,500                    8,500
39.....................  A-10 (OCO)...........................                   16,500                   16,500
44.....................  C-5 (OCO)............................                   73,400                   73,400
47.....................  C-17A (OCO)..........................                  224,450                  176,450
  .....................  Program Decrease.....................  .......................                  -48,000
56.....................  KC-10A (ATCA) (OCO)..................                    3,540                    3,540
62.....................  C-130 (OCO)..........................                  166,720                  166,720
63.....................  C-130 MODS INTEL (OCO)...............                   10,900                   10,900
66.....................  COMPASS CALL MODS....................                   10,000                   10,000
72.....................  H-60 (OCO)...........................                   81,000                  153,200
  .....................  Excess to Need for Radars............  .......................                  -61,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Transportable        .......................                  +92,800
                          Blackhawk Operation Simulators.
  .....................  Program Increase--Control Display      .......................                  +12,500
                          Unit Mission Processors.
  .....................  Program Increase--GPS/Inertial         .......................                  +27,900
                          Navigation Units.
75.....................  OTHER AIRCRAFT (OCO).................                   61,600                   61,600
78.....................  MQ-9 PAYLOAD--UAS....................                   45,000                  160,383
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +115,383
79.....................  CV-22 MODS (OCO).....................                      830                      830
80.....................  INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS..........                   10,900                   10,900
98.....................  OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES (OCO).......                   57,500                  218,138
  .....................  Transfer from Title III..............  .......................                 +160,638
104....................  DARP (OCO)...........................                   47,300                   47,300
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR                     1,362,420                1,991,955
                          FORCE.
 
                                         MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
 
5......................  PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE (OCO)......                   41,621                   41,621
10.....................  AGM-65D MAVERICK (OCO)...............                   15,000                   15,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE                   56,621                   56,621
 
                                      PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
 
2......................  CARTRIDGES (OCO).....................                   30,801                   30,801
4......................  GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS (OCO)..........                   53,192                   53,192
5......................  JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION (OCO)...                  147,991                  147,991
11.....................  FLARES (OCO).........................                   20,486                   20,486
12.....................  FUZES (OCO)..........................                   24,982                   24,982
13.....................  SMALL ARMS (OCO).....................                   15,507                   15,507
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR                  292,959                  292,959
                          FORCE.
 
                                          OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
 
2......................  MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE (OCO)........                    7,350                    5,350
  .....................  Contract Savings.....................  .......................                   -2,000
5......................  SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES (OCO).                   15,540                   13,540
  .....................  Uparmored HMMWV--Unjustified Cost      .......................                   -2,000
                          Growth.
11.....................  ITEMS LESS THAN                                            690                      690
                          $5,000,000(VEHICLES)(OCO).
16.....................  INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT (OCO)....                    1,400                    1,400
19.....................  THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMEN...                    4,354                    4,354
20.....................  WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST (OCO)...                    9,825                        0
  .....................  OS-21 Contract Delays................  .......................                   -9,825
28.....................  AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM                       6,100                    6,100
                          (OCO).
38.....................  USCENTCOM (OCO)......................                   28,784                   28,784
44.....................  MILSATCOM SPACE (OCO)................                    4,300                    4,300
46.....................  COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM (OCO)............                    8,200                    8,200
47.....................  TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT (OCO).........                    2,552                    2,552
52.....................  COMM ELECT MODS (OCO)................                      470                      470
53.....................  NIGHT VISION GOGGLES (OCO)...........                    8,833                    4,433
  .....................  NVCD-NSL Contract Delays.............  .......................                   -4,400
57.....................  CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO).........                  131,559                   16,759
  .....................  JCREW Ahead of Need..................  .......................                 -114,800
56.....................  BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT (OCO)........                    9,070                    9,070
59.....................  MOBILITY EQUIPMENT (OCO).............                   16,588                   16,588
66.....................  DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG                        9,700                    9,700
                          (OCO).
  .....................  OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO).................                2,822,166                2,736,303
  .....................  Classified Adjustment................  .......................                  -85,863
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE..                3,087,481                2,868,593
 
                                            PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
 
5......................  DIA SUPT TO CENTCOM INTELLIGENCE ACT                    27,702                   27,702
                          (OCO).
18.....................  GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS (OCO).                    1,000                    1,000
20.....................  TELEPORT PROGRAM (OCO)...............                    6,191                    6,191
23.....................  DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK                         520                      520
                          (OCO).
35.....................  AEGIS FIELDING.......................                        0                  189,720
  .....................  SM-3 Block IA--Additional 20           .......................                 +189,720
                          Interceptors.
50.....................  MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD (OCO)...........                    5,700                    5,700
52.....................  UNDISTRIBUTED, INTELLIGENCE..........                   15,000                   15,000
XX.....................  OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO).................                  323,486                  333,675
  .....................  Classified Adjustment................  .......................                  +10,189
55.....................  ROTARY WING UPGRADES &SUSTAINMENT                        5,600                    5,600
                          (OCO).
55A....................  MH-47G...............................                        0                   28,500
  .....................  Combat Loss Replacement Aircraft.....  .......................                  +28,500
56.....................  MH-47 SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROG                        4,222                   15,222
                          (OCO).
  .....................  Modifications for Combat Loss          .......................                  +11,000
                          Replacement Aircraft.
57.....................  MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION (OCO)........                        0                    7,800
  .....................  Modifications for Combat Loss          .......................                   +7,800
                          Replacement Aircraft.
58.....................  NON-STANDARD AVIATION................                        0                  121,268
  .....................  Medium NSAV -- Transfer from Title     .......................                 +121,268
                          III.
63.....................  CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION...............                        0                   15,000
  .....................  Modifications for Combat Loss          .......................                  +15,000
                          Replacement Aircraft.
64.....................  MQ-1 UAS(OCO)........................                    8,202                    8,202
65.....................  MQ-9 UAV (OCO).......................                    4,368                    4,368
71.....................  SOF ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT (OCO).....                   75,878                   65,878
  .....................  Execution Delays.....................  .......................                  -10,000
72.....................  SOF ORDNANCE ACQUISITION (OCO).......                   49,776                   49,776
73.....................  COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT &                               9,417                   31,817
                          ELECTRONICS (OCO).
  .....................  Program Increase--Unfunded             .......................                   22,400
                          Requirement.
74.....................  SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (OCO).......                  149,406                   81,306
  .....................  Leased Aircraft--Unjustified Request.  .......................                  -42,800
  .....................  HF-TTL Baseline Budget Requirement...  .......................                  -25,300
81.....................  TACTICAL VEHICLES (OCO)..............                   36,262                   91,262
  .....................  Program Increase--Unfunded             .......................                  +55,000
                          Requirement.
83.....................  COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS (OCO)....                   30,000                        0

[[Page 1912]]

 
  .....................  OCO Program Growth...................  .......................                  -30,000
88.....................  SOF AUTOMATION SYSTEMS (OCO).........                    1,291                    1,291
90.....................  SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS                            25,000                   25,000
                          INTELLIGENCE (OCO).
92.....................  SOF VISUAL AUGMENTATION, LASERS &                        3,200                   22,700
                          SENSORS (OCO).
  .....................  Program Increase--Unfunded             .......................                  +19,500
                          Requirement.
93.....................  SOF TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS (OCO).....                    3,985                    3,985
96.....................  MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (OCO)........                    5,530                    5,530
97.....................  SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS (OCO)...                   79,869                   95,545
  .....................  Program Increase--Unfunded             .......................                  +51,376
                          Requirement.
  .....................  Requirement Addressed by               .......................                  -35,700
                          Reprogramming.
  .....................  CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS..................                    2,941                    2,941
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE.....                  874,546                1,262,499
 
                                      NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT
 
  .....................  NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT.                        0                  850,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Army Reserve.......  .......................                 +140,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Navy Reserve.......  .......................                  +70,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Marine Corps         .......................                  +70,000
                          Reserve.
  .....................  Program Increase--Air Force Reserve..  .......................                  +70,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Army National Guard  .......................                 +250,000
  .....................  Program Increase--Air National Guard.  .......................                 +250,000
 
                                  MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTED VEHICLE FUND
 
  .....................  MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTED                      3,415,000                3,415,000
                          VEHICLE FUND.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
  .....................  TOTAL, PROCUREMENT...................               21,361,868               25,316,335
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          R-1                                                        Budget Request           Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, ARMY
 
48.....................  NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY                             0                   23,100
                          (OCO).
                         Program increase--Aviation night and   .......................                  +23,100
                          limited visibility sensor
                          demonstration.
60.....................  SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY                       57,900                   14,900
                          (OCO).
                         HFDS--Transfer to line 75 for          .......................                  -48,000
                          execution at request of the Army.
                         REF--Transfer from Title IV for OCO    .......................                   +5,000
                          requirement.
61.....................  TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE                             0                    7,800
                          SYSTEM--ADV DEV.
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Air Vigilance..  .......................                   +7,800
75.....................  ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT (OCO).                    5,400                   48,000
                         HFDS--Transfer from line 60 for        .......................                  +48,000
                          execution at request of the Army.
                         Long-term development effort.........  .......................                   -5,400
77.....................  ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM (OCO).....                    8,100                    8,100
171....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM                    63,306                        0
                          (OCO).
                         Protected Information--Biometrics--    .......................                  -25,134
                          Transfer to line 171x.
                         Transfer to OP,A line 51 at request    .......................                  -38,172
                          of the Army.
171x...................  FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS.................                        0                   25,134
                         Non-MIP Biometrics--Transfer from      .......................                  +25,134
                          line 171.
178....................  DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE                       16,200                   16,200
                          SYSTEMS (OCO).
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                   150,906                  143,234
                          EVALUATION, ARMY.
 
                                 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY
 
19.....................  ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED                        14,100                   10,680
                          TECHNOLOGY (OCO).
                         Unjustified request..................  .......................                   -3,420
53.....................  JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE                         1,000                    1,000
                          DEVELOPMENT (OCO).
75.....................  JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED                           0                   11,800
                          ELECTRONIC WARFARE (OCO).
                         Network Enabled EW--Transfer from      .......................                  +11,800
                          JIEDDO.
124....................  MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT (OCO)............                      300                      300
153....................  NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE                        5,200                    5,200
                          (SEW) SUPPORT (OCO).
204....................  TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES....                        0                   36,000
                         Transfer from OM,MC for Qualitative    .......................                  +36,000
                          Risk Assessment.
213....................  RQ-7 UAV (OCO).......................                    6,900                    6,900
999....................  OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO).................                   32,901                   32,901
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                    60,401                  104,781
                          EVALUATION, NAVY.
 
                               RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, AIR FORCE
 
17.....................  ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS...........                        0                   56,000
                         Blue Devil Block 2--Transfer from      .......................                  +56,000
                          JIEDDO.
36.....................  SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (OCO).......                   16,000                   16,000
66.....................  TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE                       30,000                   30,000
                          (OCO).
128....................  MQ9 UAV (OCO)........................                        0                   88,500
                         VADER/DDR on MQ-9--Transfer from       .......................                  +88,500
                          JIEDDO.
145....................  CSAF INNOVATION PROGRAM (OR ISR                              0                  112,000
                          INNOVATIONS).
                         ISR Sensor Pilot Program.............  .......................                 +112,000
164....................  MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS (OCO).......                    4,443                    4,443
211....................  NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE                            6,100                    6,100
                          TARGETING (OCO).
230....................  SPECIAL TACTICS/COMBAT CONTROL (OCO).                   10,325                   10,325
999....................  OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO).................                  199,373                  161,014
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                  -38,359
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                   266,241                  484,382
                          EVALUATION, AIR FORCE.
 
                             RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE
 
56.....................  DARPA SENSOR TECHNOLOGY..............                        0                   40,000
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Wide Area        .......................                  +40,000
                          Surveillance Development Roadmap.
197....................  LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS DCS (OCO)...                   23,125                   23,125
202....................  INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM                       750                      750
                          (OCO).
254....................  SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE                          9,440                    9,440
                          SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT (OCO).
255....................  SOF Operational Enhancements.........                        0                   14,500
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--EW Family of     .......................                  +14,500
                          Systems.
999....................  OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO).................                  123,925                  134,801
                         Classified Adjustment................  .......................                   +3,376
                         Transfer from JIEDDO--Wallaby........  .......................                   +7,500
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                   157,240                  222,616
                          EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE.
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &                   634,788                  955,013
                          EVALUATION.
 
                                             DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
 
                         OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............                1,398,092                1,398,092
                         IN-HOUSE CARE........................                  709,004                  709,004
                         PRIVATE SECTOR CARE..................                  538,376                  538,376
                         CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CARE.............                  128,412                  128,412
                         INFORMATION MANAGEMENT/IT............                    2,286                    2,286
                         MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS..............                      518                      518

[[Page 1913]]

 
                         EDUCATION AND TRAINING...............                   18,061                   18,061
                         BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS...                    1,435                    1,435
                         RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.............                        0                   24,000
                         Blast Recovery Monitors--Transfer      .......................                   +8,000
                          from JIEDDO.
                         Body Blood Flow Monitor--Transfer      .......................                   +9,000
                          from JIEDDO.
                         EMF Blast Pulse Effects--Transfer      .......................                   +7,000
                          from JIEDDO.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM........                1,398,092                1,422,092
 
                             DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE
 
                         AFGHANISTAN AIR MOBILITY.............                  141,634                  141,634
                         AFGHANISTAN BORDER FACILITIES........                    5,000                    5,000
                         AFGHANISTAN BORDER POLICE EQUIP......                   19,500                   19,500
                         AFGHANISTAN BORDER TRAINING..........                   20,000                   20,000
                         CENTCOM SUPPORT--AFGHANISTAN.........                    3,000                    3,000
                         COUNTER NARCOTICS POLICE AFGHANISTAN                    25,295                   25,295
                          FACILITIES.
                         COUNTER NARCOTICS POLICE AFGHANISTAN                    50,250                   50,250
                          TRAINING.
                         COUNTER NARCOTICS POLICE AFGHANISTAN                     1,241                    1,241
                          (CNP-A) EQUIPMENT.
                         INTELLIGENCE AND TECHNOLOGY..........                   61,500                   56,900
                         Program Adjustment...................  .......................                   -4,600
                         PAKISTAN.............................                   49,590                   49,590
                         KAZAKHSTAN...........................                    7,850                    7,850
                         KYRGYZSTAN...........................                   27,900                   27,900
                         TAJIKISTAN...........................                    8,500                    8,500
                         TURKMENISTAN.........................                   10,350                   10,350
                         UZBEKISTAN...........................                    8,500                    8,500
                         YEMEN................................                   17,000                   17,000
                         PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT...................  .......................                  -12,000
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-                  457,110                  440,510
                          DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE.
 
                                  JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND
 
1......................  ATTACK THE NETWORK...................                1,434,400                  765,200
                         Transfer to Staff and Infrastructure   .......................                 -238,800
                          for proper execution.
                         Air Vigilance--outside JIEDDO          .......................                  -13,200
                          mission--Transfer to RDTE,A line 61
                          and OM,A line 411 for proper
                          execution.
                         Blue Devil Block 2--Transfer to        .......................                  -56,000
                          RDTE,AF line 17 for proper execution.
                         Copperhead--program terminated.......  .......................                 -125,000
                         Electronic Warfare Family of Systems   .......................                  -14,500
                          (EW FoS)--Transfer to SOCOM, RDTE,DW
                          for proper execution.
                         JUON Reserve.........................  .......................                 +100,000
                         Solar ISE--outside JIEDDO mission....  .......................                   -7,000
                         Synchronization and Integration WTI    .......................                   -6,400
                          Cell--Transfer to OM,A SAG 135 and
                          OM,DW for proper execution.
                         Thermal Station (National IED          .......................                  -13,000
                          Exploitation Facility (NIEF))--
                          Transfer to OM,A SAG 135 for proper
                          execution.
                         VADER development--Transfer $88.5      .......................                 -241,800
                          million to RDTE,AF line 128.
                         Wallaby--Transfer to RDTE,DW for       .......................                   -7,500
                          proper execution.
                         Wide Area Surveillance Development     .......................                  -40,000
                          Roadmap (WASDP)--Transfer to DARPA
                          for proper execution.
                         Wolfhound II--Transfer to OM,DW for    .......................                   -6,000
                          proper execution.
2......................  DEFEAT THE DEVICE....................                1,529,390                1,223,090
                         ACES HY Roadmap--Program terminated..  .......................                  -28,000
                         Transfer to Staff and Infrastructure   .......................                 -105,000
                          for proper execution.
                         Beachcomber--Transfer to OM,A SAG 135  .......................                   -3,000
                          for proper execution.
                         Counter Bomber--Transfer to OM,A SAG   .......................                   -3,000
                          135, OM,N, OM,MC and OM,AF for
                          proper execution.
                         CREW-SSM--Universal Test Set--         .......................                   -5,000
                          Transfer to OM,A SAG 135, OM,N and
                          OM,MC for proper execution.
                         JUON Reserve.........................  .......................                 -105,000
                         Networked Enabled EW--Transfer to      .......................                  -11,800
                          RDTE,N line 75 for proper execution.
                         Personnel Borne IED/Vehicle Borne IED  .......................                  -28,000
                          (PBIED/VBIED)--Transfer to OP,A line
                          136 for proper execution.
                         Starlite Development Program--Program  .......................                  -16,000
                          terminated.
                         Subtle Magnetic Anomaly Detection      .......................                   -1,500
                          Networked Systems--Transfer to OM,A
                          SAG 135 and OM,MC for proper
                          execution.
3......................  TRAIN THE FORCE......................                  286,210                  170,410
                         Transfer to Staff and Infrastructure   .......................                  -75,400
                          for proper execution.
                         Blast Recovery Monitors--Transfer to   .......................                   -8,000
                          DHP RDTE for proper execution.
                         Body Blood Flow Monitor--Transfer to   .......................                   -9,000
                          DHP RDTE for proper execution.
                         EMF Blast Pulse Effects--Transfer to   .......................                   -7,000
                          DHP RDTE for proper execution.
                         Technical Collection Training          .......................                  -16,400
                          Program--Transfer to OM,A SAG 135
                          for proper execution.
4......................  STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE.............                        0                  635,068
                         Transfer from Title VI...............  .......................                 +215,868
                         Transfer from Attack the Network for   .......................                 +238,800
                          proper execution.
                         Transfer from Defeat the Device for    .......................                 +105,000
                          proper execution.
                         Transfer from Train the Force for      .......................                  +75,400
                          proper execution.
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE                    3,250,000                2,793,768
                          DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.
 
                                         OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
 
                         OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL......                   10,529                   10,529
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR                          10,529                   10,529
                          GENERAL.
                                                               =================================================
                         TOTAL, OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE                   5,115,731                4,666,899
                          PROGRAMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  The CHAIR. All time for general debate has expired.
  Pursuant to the rule, the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the 5-minute rule.
  No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those received for 
printing in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose dated at least 1 day before the day of consideration of the 
amendment (but no later than February 15, 2011) and pro forma 
amendments for the purpose of debate.
  Each amendment so received may be offered only by the Member who 
submitted it for printing or a designee and shall be considered as read 
if printed.
  The Clerk will read.
  The Clerk read as follows:

                                 H.R. 1

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

       The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

Division A--Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2011
Division B--Full-Year Continuing Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011
Division C--Stimulus Rescissions
Division D--Miscellaneous Provisions.

     SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

       Except as expressly provided otherwise, any reference to 
     ``this Act'' contained in division A of this Act shall be 
     treated as referring only to the provisions of that division.

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Chairman, Chairman Rogers deserves an awful 
lot of credit for having been able to put together this H.R. 1, that 
saves $100 billion over what many expected we would spend this year. 
The largest part of this bill is the defense part. The defense part of 
this bill is not a CR. It is not a continuing resolution. It is an 
actual, honest-to-God appropriations bill, one that under the 
leadership of Chairman Dicks during last year we put together; the 
subcommittee worked hard, many hearings, a really

[[Page 1914]]

good bill. We worked with our Senate counterparts and we had agreement 
on this bill.

                              {time}  1530

  We had agreement on this bill from the Defense Department, and we 
were just really disappointed that here we are 5 months into the fiscal 
year and we are just now getting this bill to the floor. It is no fault 
of Chairman Dicks. He worked hard, and I know the pressures that he 
tried to apply and that I tried to apply to get permission to put this 
bill on the floor. But, anyway, here it is and we have it today.
  It is a good defense bill. It is $516 billion. It is a lot of money; 
but our warfighters, they need training, they need salaries, they need 
pay, they need medical care, they need weapons, they need equipment, 
they need technology; and this bill, for the most part, provides that.
  The $516 billion is $14.8 billion less than was requested for this 
fiscal year. That $14.8 billion didn't come about easily. We saved that 
by going line by line the best that we could in the time that we had to 
find program changes, to find budget changes, to find slush funds that 
we didn't think were necessary, and a lot of other ways that we saved 
the $14.8 billion. But we have a good bill here, and I am hopeful that 
the House will support this today.
  One thing that is different from the bill that we thought we were 
going to have on the floor is 1,200 earmarks aren't there any more. We 
took out the earmarks, nearly $3 billion worth of earmarks.
  So we have a very clean Defense bill here for you today. I know that 
there are many who would like to have more, and there are more things 
we could do. We could reach out into the future, but the world we live 
in today shows a growing deficit, and it is important that we are 
willing to contribute to solving it. It is crucial to the future of 
this Nation that we solve this deficit problem, because if we don't, I 
hate to think what might happen to our economy, what might happen to 
our currency, what might happen to our standing in the economy of the 
world.
  I would ask the Members, if this bill came on the floor during Jack 
Murtha's chairmanship, we would have probably passed this bill in about 
10 minutes. That is the way that he did business when he was in the 
majority. We didn't quite do that. We have an open rule. We have an 
open rule here that anybody can offer an amendment that is germane to 
the bill. If it makes it better, fine, we will agree to it. If it 
doesn't make it better, we will not agree to it. We understand that 
there are some that will be subject to a point of order, and we will 
raise those points of order, but we will allow the Member that offers 
the amendment to discuss it before we raise the point of order as a 
courtesy to them.
  Anyway, again, I want to congratulate Mr. Dicks for the work that he 
did during the time that he was chairman. As he said in the general 
debate, he and I have worked together for over 30 years on the national 
security and intelligence affairs of our Nation. He is very honorable, 
a very hardworking individual, very much determined to do a good job 
for our Nation; and he shares the same feeling that I have here that 
while we may have to make reductions and have to come up with savings, 
we will not approve anything that has an adverse effect on the 
warfighter. We will not do anything that has an adverse effect on the 
readiness of our national security effort.
  It is a commitment that I made many years ago and that Mr. Dicks made 
many years ago. When we made these cuts we did not affect the 
warfighter. We didn't cut his pay. One of the largest portions of our 
Defense bill is military personnel, the cost of salaries. We did not 
cut that. We didn't get into that at all.
  The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  The Clerk will read.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2011

        The following sums are appropriated, out of any money in 
     the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year 
     ending September 30, 2011, for military functions 
     administered by the Department of Defense and for other 
     purposes, namely:

                                TITLE I

                           MILITARY PERSONNEL

                        Military Personnel, Army

       For pay, allowances, individual clothing, subsistence, 
     interest on deposits, gratuities, permanent change of station 
     travel (including all expenses thereof for organizational 
     movements), and expenses of temporary duty travel between 
     permanent duty stations, for members of the Army on active 
     duty, (except members of reserve components provided for 
     elsewhere), cadets, and aviation cadets; for members of the 
     Reserve Officers' Training Corps; and for payments pursuant 
     to section 156 of Public Law 97-377, as amended (42 U.S.C. 
     402 note), and to the Department of Defense Military 
     Retirement Fund, $41,042,653,000.

                        Military Personnel, Navy

       For pay, allowances, individual clothing, subsistence, 
     interest on deposits, gratuities, permanent change of station 
     travel (including all expenses thereof for organizational 
     movements), and expenses of temporary duty travel between 
     permanent duty stations, for members of the Navy on active 
     duty (except members of the Reserve provided for elsewhere), 
     midshipmen, and aviation cadets; for members of the Reserve 
     Officers' Training Corps; and for payments pursuant to 
     section 156 of Public Law 97-377, as amended (42 U.S.C. 402 
     note), and to the Department of Defense Military Retirement 
     Fund, $25,912,449,000.

                    Military Personnel, Marine Corps

       For pay, allowances, individual clothing, subsistence, 
     interest on deposits, gratuities, permanent change of station 
     travel (including all expenses thereof for organizational 
     movements), and expenses of temporary duty travel between 
     permanent duty stations, for members of the Marine Corps on 
     active duty (except members of the Reserve provided for 
     elsewhere); and for payments pursuant to section 156 of 
     Public Law 97-377, as amended (42 U.S.C. 402 note), and to 
     the Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund, 
     $13,210,161,000.

                     Military Personnel, Air Force

       For pay, allowances, individual clothing, subsistence, 
     interest on deposits, gratuities, permanent change of station 
     travel (including all expenses thereof for organizational 
     movements), and expenses of temporary duty travel between 
     permanent duty stations, for members of the Air Force on 
     active duty (except members of reserve components provided 
     for elsewhere), cadets, and aviation cadets; for members of 
     the Reserve Officers' Training Corps; and for payments 
     pursuant to section 156 of Public Law 97-377, as amended (42 
     U.S.C. 402 note), and to the Department of Defense Military 
     Retirement Fund, $27,105,755,000.

                        Reserve Personnel, Army

       For pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, 
     travel, and related expenses for personnel of the Army 
     Reserve on active duty under sections 10211, 10302, and 3038 
     of title 10, United States Code, or while serving on active 
     duty under section 12301(d) of title 10, United States Code, 
     in connection with performing duty specified in section 
     12310(a) of title 10, United States Code, or while undergoing 
     reserve training, or while performing drills or equivalent 
     duty or other duty, and expenses authorized by section 16131 
     of title 10, United States Code; and for payments to the 
     Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund, 
     $4,333,165,000.

                        Reserve Personnel, Navy

       For pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, 
     travel, and related expenses for personnel of the Navy 
     Reserve on active duty under section 10211 of title 10, 
     United States Code, or while serving on active duty under 
     section 12301(d) of title 10, United States Code, in 
     connection with performing duty specified in section 12310(a) 
     of title 10, United States Code, or while undergoing reserve 
     training, or while performing drills or equivalent duty, and 
     expenses authorized by section 16131 of title 10, United 
     States Code; and for payments to the Department of Defense 
     Military Retirement Fund, $1,940,191,000.

                    Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps

       For pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, 
     travel, and related expenses for personnel of the Marine 
     Corps Reserve on active duty under section 10211 of title 10, 
     United States Code, or while serving on active duty under 
     section 12301(d) of title 10, United States Code, in 
     connection with performing duty specified in section 12310(a) 
     of title 10, United States Code, or while undergoing reserve 
     training, or while performing drills or equivalent duty, and 
     for members of the Marine Corps platoon leaders class, and 
     expenses authorized by section 16131 of title 10, United 
     States Code; and for payments to the Department of Defense 
     Military Retirement Fund, $612,191,000.

                      Reserve Personnel, Air Force

       For pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, 
     travel, and related expenses for personnel of the Air Force 
     Reserve on active duty under sections 10211, 10305, and 8038 
     of title 10, United States Code, or while serving on active 
     duty under section 12301(d) of title 10, United States Code, 
     in connection with performing duty specified in section 
     12310(a)

[[Page 1915]]

     of title 10, United States Code, or while undergoing reserve 
     training, or while performing drills or equivalent duty or 
     other duty, and expenses authorized by section 16131 of title 
     10, United States Code; and for payments to the Department of 
     Defense Military Retirement Fund, $1,650,797,000.

                     National Guard Personnel, Army

       For pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, 
     travel, and related expenses for personnel of the Army 
     National Guard while on duty under section 10211, 10302, or 
     12402 of title 10 or section 708 of title 32, United States 
     Code, or while serving on duty under section 12301(d) of 
     title 10 or section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, 
     in connection with performing duty specified in section 
     12310(a) of title 10, United States Code, or while undergoing 
     training, or while performing drills or equivalent duty or 
     other duty, and expenses authorized by section 16131 of title 
     10, United States Code; and for payments to the Department of 
     Defense Military Retirement Fund, $7,511,296,000.

                  National Guard Personnel, Air Force

       For pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, 
     travel, and related expenses for personnel of the Air 
     National Guard on duty under section 10211, 10305, or 12402 
     of title 10 or section 708 of title 32, United States Code, 
     or while serving on duty under section 12301(d) of title 10 
     or section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, in 
     connection with performing duty specified in section 12310(a) 
     of title 10, United States Code, or while undergoing 
     training, or while performing drills or equivalent duty or 
     other duty, and expenses authorized by section 16131 of title 
     10, United States Code; and for payments to the Department of 
     Defense Military Retirement Fund, $3,060,098,000.

                                TITLE II

                       OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

                    Operation and Maintenance, Army

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance of the Army, as authorized by law; 
     and not to exceed $12,478,000 can be used for emergencies and 
     extraordinary expenses, to be expended on the approval or 
     authority of the Secretary of the Army, and payments may be 
     made on his certificate of necessity for confidential 
     military purposes, $33,306,117,000.

                    Operation and Maintenance, Navy

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance of the Navy and the Marine Corps, 
     as authorized by law; and not to exceed $14,804,000 can be 
     used for emergencies and extraordinary expenses, to be 
     expended on the approval or authority of the Secretary of the 
     Navy, and payments may be made on his certificate of 
     necessity for confidential military purposes, 
     $37,809,239,000.

                Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance of the Marine Corps, as authorized 
     by law, $5,539,740,000.

                  Operation and Maintenance, Air Force

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance of the Air Force, as authorized by 
     law; and not to exceed $7,699,000 can be used for emergencies 
     and extraordinary expenses, to be expended on the approval or 
     authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, and payments may 
     be made on his certificate of necessity for confidential 
     military purposes, $36,062,989,000.

                Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance of activities and agencies of the 
     Department of Defense (other than the military departments), 
     as authorized by law, $30,210,810,000:  Provided, That not 
     more than $50,000,000 may be used for the Combatant Commander 
     Initiative Fund authorized under section 166a of title 10, 
     United States Code:  Provided further, That not to exceed 
     $36,000,000 can be used for emergencies and extraordinary 
     expenses, to be expended on the approval or authority of the 
     Secretary of Defense, and payments may be made on his 
     certificate of necessity for confidential military purposes:  
     Provided further, That of the funds provided under this 
     heading, not less than $31,659,000 shall be made available 
     for the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative 
     Agreement Program, of which not less than $3,600,000 shall be 
     available for centers defined in 10 U.S.C. 2411(1)(D):  
     Provided further, That none of the funds appropriated or 
     otherwise made available by this Act may be used to plan or 
     implement the consolidation of a budget or appropriations 
     liaison office of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the 
     office of the Secretary of a military department, or the 
     service headquarters of one of the Armed Forces into a 
     legislative affairs or legislative liaison office:  Provided 
     further, That $8,251,000, to remain available until expended, 
     is available only for expenses relating to certain classified 
     activities, and may be transferred as necessary by the 
     Secretary of Defense to operation and maintenance 
     appropriations or research, development, test and evaluation 
     appropriations, to be merged with and to be available for the 
     same time period as the appropriations to which transferred:  
     Provided further, That any ceiling on the investment item 
     unit cost of items that may be purchased with operation and 
     maintenance funds shall not apply to the funds described in 
     the preceding proviso:  Provided further, That the transfer 
     authority provided under this heading is in addition to any 
     other transfer authority provided elsewhere in this Act.


                 Amendment No. 370 Offered by Mr. Flake

  Mr. FLAKE. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
  The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 9, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $18,750,000)''.
       Page 359, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(increased by $18,750,000)''.

  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. FLAKE. I thank the chairman. I just want to say a few words about 
the process here.
  It is refreshing to so many of us to come to the House with an open 
rule. There are some Members who have been part of this body for 4 
years now and have not been allowed the opportunity to offer one 
amendment on the floor because of the absence of open rules. So we are 
going to have a number of amendments offered here, and this is just a 
great process.
  I also want to commend the Appropriations Committee for the hard work 
that it took to get the level of savings that we are in the legislation 
and what a positive step, as was mentioned, it was to cut out the 
earmarks. There are no earmarks in this bill. That is a wonderful 
thing. We can actually talk more about the substance and less about 
just pet projects on the side.
  This amendment would reduce by $18.75 million the operations and 
maintenance defense-wide account. It would send the money to the 
spending reduction account. We are often told that when we offer 
amendments like this on the floor, it is not going to save any money. 
This one does. The money that is saved here will go to the spending 
reduction account.
  Last August, Secretary Gates ordered a review of all outside boards 
and commissions that provide advice and studies to the Defense 
Department with an eye toward eliminating unnecessary entities and 
cutting funding for the studies that they produce by 25 percent.
  According to CRS, the Department of Defense funds 65 boards and 
commissions at a cost of about $75 million. This amendment would 
achieve the approximate savings that Secretary Gates sought for FY 2011 
that would equal $18.75 million. That is 25 percent of the $75 million 
over time. I certainly don't have any problems with the various panels 
from which the Defense Department seeks counsel, but I am sure there is 
some waste there. That is why Secretary Gates has targeted a 25 percent 
reduction.
  I realize the amount of savings in this amendment is relatively small 
compared to the overall defense budget, but I think the point has to be 
made here that the defense budget is not sacrosanct. We can't say if it 
is defense, it is all good; that there is no waste here, we can't cut 
any. So it is important to look for ways we can actually save.
  In fiscal year 2010, more than $1 trillion was spent on discretionary 
spending. The Department of Defense received more than $508 billion of 
that. Certainly in a Federal agency that requires the largest budget, 
this is the Federal agency that has the largest budget, there is going 
to be some waste and inefficiencies.

                              {time}  1540

  This is a great place to start. This is a proposal that came from the 
Defense Secretary himself, one that wasn't included in the underlying 
bill, and one that will be addressed in the FY 2012 budget, according 
the documents released yesterday. In fact, according to the Defense 
Department, it intends to achieve a savings of more than a billion 
dollars in FY 2012 simply by eliminating internally produced reports 
and reducing funding for the types of studies that I'm talking about 
here.
  I applaud the Department's willingness to talk about cuts in its own 
budget. I urge my colleagues to adopt the

[[Page 1916]]

same willingness here. If the Defense Department is willing to find 
savings, we ought to be able to do that here as well. We need to reduce 
this account which funds boards and commissions and the studies they 
produce by $18.75 million.
  Again, passing this amendment will reduce funding that will not 
impact the warfighter. It won't impact the war in Afghanistan or the 
war still going on in Iraq. This would simply signal that this body is 
willing to cut where we can cut without affecting the necessary 
protections that we have in the Department of Defense.
  The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
gentleman's amendment.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mainly, what I'm opposed to is the fact we're 
not sure what boards or commissions this amendment would deal with. I 
think it's probably a good idea, but I think the subcommittee will 
really like to have an opportunity to investigate whether or not a 
board is necessary or is doing some positive function for the 
Department of Defense. We'd like to have time to look into that.
  We agree with the gentleman that we should find all the savings, all 
the waste we can, and we did. We reduced the request for this year by 
the $14.8 billion. I think we did a pretty good job.
  On the gentleman's comment about the process, I had the privilege of 
serving as chairman of this Appropriations Committee for 6 years. I 
never brought an appropriations bill to the floor under a closed rule. 
It was 6 years that any germane amendment could be offered.
  Mr. DICKS. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. I yield to the gentleman.
  Mr. DICKS. I, first of all, want to thank the gentleman for his very 
kind comments earlier.
  This amendment cuts $18.75 million from operations and maintenance 
Defense-wide to reduce boards and commissions. Well, I think things 
like the Defense Science Board are very important. We have a number of 
commissions that are looking into acquisition reform that are trying to 
help us save money, help us get our acquisition straightened out.
  So I agree with the gentleman. I think we should strongly oppose this 
amendment, and I yield back to the gentleman.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. I thank the gentleman for his comments. Like I 
said, the subcommittee would really like an opportunity to really 
review this to make sure that we don't make a mistake and cut something 
that is important.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. LEE. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Ms. LEE. I rise today in support of the bipartisan Flake amendment, 
No. 370, to cut $18.75 million from the Defense-wide operations and 
maintenance budget at the Pentagon.
  In my opinion, any discussion about getting our fiscal house in order 
must begin with a real discussion about reducing the bloated size of 
the Pentagon budget and ending the war in Afghanistan. And if we are 
really serious about reducing the deficit, we should be cutting Defense 
to the 2008 levels rather than cutting domestic discretionary spending 
to 2008 levels.
  We're talking about a $750 billion budget. But the Republican 
continuing resolution fails to cut the Pentagon budget, and it really 
increases it by more than $8 billion this year. This will put families 
and teachers and cops and children out on the street. These cuts will 
not come close to ending the deficit, will only hurt our economy, won't 
create any jobs, and given the fact that our economy is on the verge of 
recovery, we should be doing everything in our power to create jobs. A 
nearly $700 million cut to food for women, infants, and children during 
the height of a recession is really heartless and cold. This cut will 
not balance the budget and it will certainly not magically reduce the 
number of hungry children and families across the country.
  Republicans want to cut billions of dollars in education programs 
that impact students at every level, from preschool to graduate school, 
starting with $1.1 billion in terms of a cut for Head Start. That's 
going to hurt millions of needy preschoolers. Gutting the Federal 
Supplemental Education Opportunity Grants by $757 million will really 
end the dreams of needy college students to be first in their families 
to earn a college or university degree. Republicans are willing to risk 
the futures of millions of needy students.
  Republican cuts to cost-effective and critical programs like 
Community Health Centers are a prime example of what is really wrong 
with this one-sided approach to the budget. Smart investments in 
improving access to primary care and preventive health services, 
especially through low-cost programs like the Community Health Centers, 
are the most effective way to reduce the long-term costs of health care 
in our country and to reduce the deficit. Republican attempts to cut 
support for maternal and child health, $50 million; family planning, 
$317 million; State funds for Health Access Grants, $75 million, 
worsens the health of children and families, increases the rates of 
chronic diseases, and does nothing to reduce the deficit.
  As a member of the Appropriations Committee, we see these budgets 
come to us each and every day, and we know the impact of what these 
cuts will do to the majority of Americans who are just struggling to 
survive through this downturn. We're in the middle of a housing crisis, 
and we are struggling to correct this. We're seeing unprecedented 
demand for housing assistance and a near standstill in private 
construction of affordable housing. Republicans somehow believe that 
this would be a good time to make massive cuts to rental assistance 
that keeps countless families from suffering homelessness. They want to 
dramatically cut Community Development Funds and the Public Housing 
Capital Fund, which invests Federal dollars in creating desperately 
needed new affordable housing.
  Worse, these cuts will do nothing to create jobs or jump-start the 
economy. They are the wrong prescription for what ails our country, and 
we need to go back to the drawing board. The Flake amendment will cut 
over $18 million from Defense, which is an excellent beginning, but 
only a beginning.
  So, in closing, let me just remind our friends on the other side of 
the aisle that budgets really are moral documents. They reflect our 
values and who we are as Americans. Proposing these deep and painful 
cuts reflects an unfortunate reality that we are putting bombs and 
missiles and wasteful Pentagon spending first rather than creating jobs 
for people who deserve to live the American Dream.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. POMPEO. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of 
words.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Kansas is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. POMPEO. I yield to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Flake).
  Mr. FLAKE. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Let me just say it was asked which boards and commissions are there 
which this would cut. There are some 65 boards and commissions. Some 
are blue ribbon panels. The biggest three are the Defense Policy Board, 
the Defense Science Board, and the Defense Business Board.
  But let me say, again, what this amendment does is simply moves 
forward what the Secretary of Defense has already identified as savings 
that he would like to achieve. He has said that they want to cut 25 
percent of the budget for these boards and commissions.
  The Secretary put this report out in August of last year, so it seems 
that he intended this for the FY 2011 cycle. That's what we're in right 
now. We're simply doing what, in my view, the Secretary of Defense has 
asked us to do or what he is going to carry through.

[[Page 1917]]

  If we can't do this on Defense or on other wasteful spending, where 
can we do it? This is a great place to start. We should get this done 
now because it's going to be tackled later on. Why not get a head start 
and do it in the FY 2011 budget. If we're trying to realize the savings 
that we're trying to realize, let's take these boards and commissions 
that the Secretary of Defense has already said we should cut by 25 
percent and give them what he asked for.

                              {time}  1550

  Mr. POMPEO. Reclaiming my time, it is the case that Mr. Flake's 
amendment addresses a very important issue, and that's duplicative 
processes and duplicative agencies. As a former soldier, there is 
nothing I care more about than making sure we take care of our airmen, 
our sailors, our marines. I think it is a great place to start to make 
sure we do just that by eliminating this from the Department of Defense 
appropriations bill.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. HONDA. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. HONDA. I rise in support of this amendment. I am opposed to this 
continuing resolution and to the Republicans' ``no jobs'' agenda.
  Mr. Chairman, the American people want a recovery that supports jobs. 
Republicans have controlled the House for 41 days and have brought up 
zero bills to create jobs. These mindless cuts mean 1 million job cuts: 
no jobs for nurses, no jobs for teachers, no jobs for police, no jobs 
for firefighters, no jobs for manufacturing, and no jobs for small 
businesses.
  Even worse than what the Republicans are doing to American workers is 
what they are doing to America's children. This bill will cut funding 
for education programs by over $10 billion, or 16 percent, which is the 
largest education cut in history.
  The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, IDEA, State grants 
will be slashed by $557 million, shifting to States and local districts 
the costs of educating 324,000 students with disabilities, therefore 
increasing local tax burdens and killing over 7,000 education jobs.
  Pell Grants. Pell Grants will be cut by $5.6 billion, making it more 
difficult for low- and middle-income families to pay for college. These 
cuts would eliminate or reduce aid for almost 1.5 million students.
  Head Start. Head Start would be cut by over $1 billion, leading to 
the elimination of enrollment slots for 127,000 poor children and the 
potential loss of over 14,000 jobs.
  No one who votes for this bill could ever have the audacity to say 
they care about our children.
  Republicans are wearing their hearts on their sleeves a day after 
Valentine's Day, but they don't care about children. They don't care 
about working middle class families, and they don't care to follow the 
rules of the road. Instead, Republicans want to make you pay. They want 
to make you pay for Big Oil's $1 billion subsidies, make you pay for 
higher drug prices, make you pay taxes to start your small business, 
make you pay for CEO salaries, and make you and your children go it 
alone.
  So, Mr. Chairman, in closing, I oppose this bill. Republicans want 
you to keep paying for their war and tax cuts for the ultra-rich while 
they cut jobs, services, and schools. This is not fiscal discipline. 
This is fiscal insanity.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. GRIJALVA. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The CHAIR. The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. GRIJALVA. I rise in support of the amendment that Mr. Flake has 
proposed, and I rise in strong opposition to the underlying CR.
  Mr. Chairman, the consequence of this whole discussion about dealing 
with the deficit and the budget reduction that is being recommended by 
the Republicans is going to be jobs. If you look at what is being 
proposed, the other side has had nearly 2 months but has brought zero 
bills that create jobs. These cuts amount to 1 million jobs that will 
be lost.
  There will be no jobs for nurses. $51 million will be cut from the 
National Park Service; that is a loss of jobs. $256 million will be cut 
from State and Federal law enforcement; that is the local police that 
will be cut. $889 million will be cut from renewable energy programs; 
those are jobs creating solar panels and outfitting and retrofitting 
homes so they will be energy-efficient. $1 billion will be cut from the 
National Institutes of Health, which will be a loss of jobs in research 
and in providing direct public health care to the American citizens. 
$1.3 billion will be cut from community health centers; that means no 
jobs and increased costs in the emergency rooms, where people with very 
acute illnesses will be--people who will not be able to find health 
care because they will have nowhere else to go. There will be cuts in 
rural development--a loss of jobs. There will be a $1.6 billion cut for 
the Environmental Protection Agency--a loss of jobs. There will be a 
$96 million cut for substance abuse and mental health services--a loss 
of jobs.
  One of the realities is that we must invest. It has been said over 
and over again that the point of dealing with this deficit that we have 
in this country has to be a pragmatic, measured process. It has taken 
us 10 years to get into the hole that we are in, and we need to plan to 
get out of that with the same amount of time, if not more.
  We also need to talk about revenue generation. We are not going to 
cut our way out of this deficit, and you are certainly not going to cut 
your way out of this deficit when you are only concentrating on 14 or 
15 percent of the Federal budget, which is why I support this amendment 
as it is an attempt to deal with defense.
  We must create revenues. We must quit giving huge subsidies to Big 
Oil and Big Gas. We must ask mining companies, for once, to begin to 
pay royalties on the extractions provided them by the public lands. We 
must close the corporate loopholes that exist that created the 
financial collapse of housing in this country, and we must ask Wall 
Street to pay its fair share through a transaction fee, which will 
generate billions and billions of dollars for the taxpayers of this 
country.
  In order to deal with this deficit, there must be a corresponding 
generation of revenue so we can continue to invest in the things that 
are important to the American people: their families, their lives, 
their education, their health care, their futures. That is an 
investment, and with additional revenue we will be able to begin to cut 
the deficit.
  The continuing resolution is not an effort to deal with the deficit. 
It is a calculation to deal with programs and projects that have helped 
the middle class succeed, poor people survive, the disabled endure. 
They are programs and projects that have made this country stronger 
with their support for education and health care.
  I urge all of my colleagues to vote against the continuing 
resolution.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. FUDGE. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Ohio is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Ms. FUDGE. I rise to support Mr. Flake's amendment because saving $18 
million from defense is a great start; but I do, indeed, oppose the 
underlying Republican continuing resolution.
  Mr. Chairman, this resolution threatens jobs, American innovation, 
and jeopardizes investments that will rebuild America.
  As a member of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, I 
believe that innovation will lead our Nation and our economy forward. 
We all know that basic research and technology development create jobs 
and will help America to win the future. The Republicans have this 
thing backwards. They have proposed cutting $2.5 billion to fund the 
National Institutes of Health. This $2.5 billion to NIH funding will be 
devastating to the biomedical industry that serves as the backbone of 
Cleveland and so many other communities across the country.
  The innovative ways that scientists are pursuing solutions to human 
suffering with neuroimaging, genomics,

[[Page 1918]]

and the development of novel treatments that arise from basic findings 
will improve life for all of us. Innovation will cut down on the costs 
of these illnesses, lost productivity in the workplace, and it will 
create important avenues for new investigations that will create new 
jobs, new ventures, and new industries.
  We must continue to make investments in America. Our future is in 
innovation and technology development, and these cuts are not something 
we can afford. The loss of funding also means the loss of jobs.
  Where are the jobs?
  According to a new analysis by the nonpartisan Economic Policy 
Institute, the Republican CR will cost more than 800,000 private and 
public jobs. Republicans have controlled the House for 41 days, nearly 
2 months, and have brought up zero bills to create jobs. Republicans 
want to cut Social Security and Medicare. When Republicans say they're 
cutting costs, they mean cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid 
until they don't exist.
  The American people want leadership that will create jobs and jump-
start our Nation's economy. This careless resolution cuts jobs and 
damages the economy.
  Again, I do support the amendment by Mr. Flake, but the Republican CR 
is bad for the American economy, and it is bad for Americans. I urge my 
colleagues to oppose the Republican CR and help put Americans back to 
work.

                              {time}  1600

  Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Ms. WOOLSEY. I too rise in support of Mr. Flake's amendment. I see it 
as a small beginning, a very small beginning, to cutting wasteful 
Pentagon spending. But Mr. Chair, this entire continuing resolution is 
bad for the economy and bad for this country. It's all a part of the 
Republican no jobs for America agenda.
  The majority has no interest in doing anything whatsoever to help the 
9 percent of Americans who are out of work. They've controlled the 
House for just about 6 weeks, and they've not brought up a single bill 
that would create a single job. They've brought up a bill that would 
continue to shred our civil liberties. They've brought up a bill that 
will infuse our campaigns with even more corrupting special interest 
money. They've brought up a bill that would take away guaranteed 
affordable health care. But nothing to address persistent joblessness. 
Nothing at all to fix the devastating recession that they caused in the 
first place.
  Their mindless cuts don't do anything to strengthen America. They're 
not cutting spending; they're cutting jobs. Their agenda means cutting 
jobs for nurses, cutting jobs for teachers, police officers, small 
businesses, the very people who form the backbone of the middle class 
of the United States of America. The Speaker of the House himself said 
this morning that if some jobs are lost as a result of their cuts, ``so 
be it.'' He might as well have added, ``Let them eat cake.''
  The best way to reduce the deficit is to put Americans back to work, 
Mr. Chairman, but the Republicans' no-jobs plan is all about cutting 
the very spending that sustains middle class families. When they say 
they want to cut costs, what they really mean is they want to cut 
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid right out of existence, and on 
top of cutting their hard-earned benefits, the Republicans want to make 
the middle class pay--pay for Big Oil's big subsidies, pay for higher 
drug prices, pay for astronomical CEO salaries, for higher taxes to 
start a small business.
  The chairman of the House Budget Committee said yesterday, and I 
quote him, ``What we're doing here is we're having a great debate in 
Congress about how much spending we should cut. I mean, how cool is 
that?'' Well, I'd like to tell him it's not cool at all, Mr. Chairman, 
not when you're asking struggling families to shoulder the sacrifice. 
Giving a sweetheart deal to corporate special interests and asking the 
middle class to pay for it--not cool at all.
  The Republicans' continuing resolution and no-jobs agenda--bad for 
America, totally uncool.
  Ms. SCHAKOWSKY. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR (Mrs. Miller of Michigan). The gentlewoman from 
Illinois is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Ms. SCHAKOWSKY. Madam Chair, I rise in support of the Flake 
amendment, and I strongly oppose the underlying Republican no-jobs 
continuing resolution.
  If people out there have the gnawing feel that the rich are getting 
richer and the poor are getting poorer, and they're stuck in the middle 
and stuck getting the bill, the fact of the matter is they're right. 
This bill is just another example of the Republicans' true agenda, 
which is helping out big business and the rich while sticking it to the 
middle class and those who aspire to it.
  The cuts that they're proposing would actually cause a devastating 
wave of unemployment at the State and local level, particularly in the 
public sector. The Economic Policy Institute has estimated that passage 
would cost us nearly 1 million jobs. Who are we talking about? You 
know, it's cool these days to go after public sector workers, but what 
we're talking about are the teachers--I was one once a long time ago--
the teachers who teach our children and grandchildren, the very police 
who keep our streets safe and put their lives on the line, and the 
firefighters who answer our 9/11 emergency call. We're talking about 
workers who are the backbone of our communities.
  Over the last 2 years, the Democratic Congress and President Obama 
were successfully able to stave off a second Great Depression, but 
we're still in the early stages of recovery, unemployment is still too 
high at 9 percent, and American families are still suffering. The 
proposed cuts would cost us 1 million more jobs, be devastating to our 
recovery, and hurt Americans trying to take care of their families and 
make ends meet.
  Let's just take a look at some of the things they want to cut. How 
about the National Institutes of Health would be cut $1.6 billion? This 
is funding that goes to vital medical research, including cures and 
improved treatments for devastating diseases. High speed rail 
development, which would provide desperately needed jobs, but beyond 
that, reinvigorate a keystone of the American infrastructure, it faces 
$2.5 billion in cuts.
  In addition to the important jobs program, what really hurts is 
Republicans want to put assistance to poor families on the cutting 
board. They want to cut $1 billion for community health centers, the 
only access to health care for many poor families. And how about $747 
million for the Women, Infants and Children, the WIC program? That's 
food assistance for low-income pregnant women and their children. The 
300,000 beneficiaries in my State of Illinois receive a grand average 
benefit of $44.62 a month. That's it, per person, per month, and that 
minimal subsidy would be cut.
  House Republicans' proposals to slash Federal spending programs are 
irresponsible and indiscriminate, eliminating programs that create jobs 
and cutting assistance for low-income and middle class families. There 
is another way to deal with the deficit and to balance our budget.
  We need to enact a Democratic initiative to make it in America. We 
should be making things here. We should revive our manufacturing sector 
rather than providing tax breaks that encourage companies to go 
offshore.
  I offered a plan last year as part of President Obama's 18-member 
National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform to make 
investments that get us out of the economic doldrums, boost job 
creation, and reduce the deficit--and not on the backs of low-income 
and middle-income Americans.
  We can do it. We need to stop the Republican efforts and protect job-
creating programs that benefit the middle class and the safety net 
programs that help the most vulnerable in our society because that's 
who we are as Americans.
  The Republicans refuse to make the investments necessary to get 
people

[[Page 1919]]

back to work because they refuse to give up tax cuts for millionaires 
and billionaires. Their policies are a prescription for disaster, one 
that puts families, communities, and our Nation at risk.
  Mr. FILNER. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. FILNER. I'm a little disappointed in the amendment by my friend 
from Arizona. This is our biggest deficit hawk in the House. He wants 
to cut $18 million from the Defense budget. Did I get that number 
right, Mr. Flake, $18 million? I mean, we've got a $612 billion Defense 
budget. What are you, .000001 percent of the budget? Not good for a 
Senator from Arizona, Mr. Flake.
  I would say let's really get at this. Man, you want to cut the 
budget? Republican President and Republican Congress funded a whole two 
wars off the budget. We're talking about trillions of dollars added to 
our deficit. You don't go after those, Mr. Flake. We need you to go 
after those. We will gladly support you. Eighteen million out of a $612 
billion budget? I'll vote for the amendment, and you know, whenever I 
vote for one, you win.
  But let's go after some real stuff in that Pentagon budget, and let's 
not go after jobs as this underlying bill does. Come on. You know, you 
talked about jobs the whole campaign. I haven't seen a pro-job bill yet 
from the Republicans in this Congress, and yet this bill, H.R. 1, cuts 
millions of jobs.

                              {time}  1610

  I am on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Mr. Flake. I 
don't know if you know about it, but the cuts to the clean water 
moneys--


                    Announcement by the Acting Chair

  The Acting CHAIR. Members are advised to address their comments to 
the Chair, and not to other Members in the second person.
  Mr. FILNER. Madam Chair, did you know that the bill cuts millions of 
jobs from our economy, the cuts to the Clean Water Act, the cuts to the 
High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program, and other infrastructure 
cuts? In my State of California, we are losing, just on this bill, 
almost 50,000 jobs; the total jobs around the country, almost 300,000. 
Come on. This is not a way to both cut the deficit and keep our economy 
going.
  I happen to represent a border district. I represent the whole 
Mexican border with California. Madam Chair, I'm sure Mr. Flake knows 
very well the border in Arizona, and he knows that in this bill, the 
GSA construction and acquisition funding line has been eliminated--
eliminated--$894 million worth.
  I don't know about in the State that Mr. Flake represents, but I'll 
tell you, in California, you are eliminating the several-hundred-
million-dollar modernization of two of the biggest border crossings in 
our country and the biggest one in the world.
  In my district, 300,000 people cross the border every day legally--
legally--and they're crossing mainly for jobs and for shopping. We all 
know we need to make that far more efficient, that crossing, so people 
can spend money in our country and create jobs. You have eliminated the 
whole modernization moneys out of this budget, and I'm sure it affects 
Arizona.
  The Otay Mesa crossing where we have all the commercial crossings in 
California, gone. The biggest border crossing in the world in San 
Ysidro, gone. Another big one in my district, Calexico, California, 
gone.
  We are leaving billions of dollars on the table, Madam Chair, for 
jobs in our economy. If we don't have efficient border crossings, we 
don't have trade. We don't have shopping. We don't have the crossings 
that are legal that we all want to encourage. These modernization 
programs went directly at that, not only in California but in Texas, in 
New Mexico, and I'm sure in Arizona. And yet all those jobs that are 
created by more efficient crossings are now thrown away.
  So the gentleman from Arizona who wants to give up efficient border 
crossings in his State, you might tell him, Madam Chairman, I don't 
think that's a good way to run for the Senate. Taking $18 million out 
of a defense budget of $612 billion is pretty miserly stuff. It's not 
even a good symbol for a guy running for Senate in the United States.
  We should really go after what the Republicans said they are going 
after. Let's end the war in Afghanistan, save trillions of dollars off 
the deficit. But more importantly, the cuts that we have seen in 
infrastructure in this country, the cuts we have seen in GSA are 
costing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of jobs. This is a job 
buster. It should be defeated.
  I yield back the balance of my time, Madam Chair.
  Mr. TONKO. Madam Chair, I rise to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. TONKO. Madam Chair, while I support the Flake amendment, I oppose 
the underlying continuing resolution.
  The Republicans are here today offering another piece of their ``no 
jobs'' agenda, and they are in disarray and are hastily pushing an 
irresponsible and dangerous spending bill that threatens jobs, 
undercuts American innovation, and jeopardizes investments in 
rebuilding America.
  Creating jobs, protecting the middle class, and reducing the deficit 
are, indeed, my top priorities. We should be working together to 
accomplish these very valid goals. However, Republicans have controlled 
this House for 41 days, nearly 2 months, and brought up zero bills to 
create jobs. The mindless cuts that are on this floor today mean 1 
million jobs cut, 1 million jobs cut from our economy--no jobs for 
nurses, no jobs for teachers, no jobs for police, no jobs for 
firefighters, no jobs for manufacturing, no jobs for small businesses.
  You cut the deficit by putting America back to work, not by cutting 
Social Security. Republicans aim to cut Social Security and Medicare. 
When Republicans say they are cutting costs, they mean cutting Social 
Security, Medicare, and Medicaid until they don't exist. Ask my seniors 
in the 21st Congressional District of New York, and they'll tell you to 
leave alone the Social Security system that has served them well.
  Republicans want to make you pay, make you pay for Big Oil's billion-
dollar subsidies, make you pay for higher drug prices, make you pay 
taxes to start a small business, make you pay for CEO salaries, let 
Main Street take a hit while Wall Street gets a bonus. The American 
people want Republican leaders to look out for constituents first, not 
their corporate friends. This careless resolution cuts jobs and damages 
our economy.
  Just 6 weeks after taking charge of the House, Republicans are not 
just ignoring jobs; they are cutting them, and they admit it. This 
morning, our Speaker, Speaker Boehner, had a response to our concern 
that this bill destroys--destroys--American jobs. And he said, ``So be 
it.'' Well, I guess that he meant, so be it if there are 1,300 fewer 
cops on the beat, because this bill terminates the COPS hiring program. 
So be it if there are 2,400 fewer firefighters on the job protecting 
their communities, because this bill eliminates funding for SAFER 
grants. So be it if there are 20,000 fewer researchers at the National 
Science Foundation. So be it if there are 25,000 lost construction jobs 
and 76 construction projects are canceled in 40 States. So be it if 
there are 200,000 children kicked out of Head Start programs, and so be 
it if thousands of teachers will lose their jobs.
  Mr. Speaker, ``so be it'' isn't a good enough answer for the 
hardworking middle class of our country.
  I agree with the President that we must out-innovate, out-educate, 
and out-build the rest of the world. We will continue to measure every 
effort by whether it creates jobs, strengthens the middle class, and 
reduces the deficit.
  I have submitted eight amendments to this irresponsible Republican 
spending bill to protect and grow jobs, out-innovate other countries in 
clean energy, protect our seniors, and ensure quality education for our 
children.

[[Page 1920]]

  I support efforts to balance the budget. However, I will not support 
a spending bill that threatens our economic recovery, that cuts 1 
million jobs just after we have created 1.2 million private sector jobs 
since last March, and is achieved on the backs of senior citizens, 
children, and the working middle class.
  Republicans have gone too far, sacrificing Americans' health, safety, 
and future in order to protect their special interests while offering 
no real plan to create jobs.
  Madam Chair, the American people are united, and they are saying one 
thing: Show us the jobs.
  I urge defeat of this bill.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from the Virgin Islands is 
recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Madam Chair, I rise in opposition to the Flake 
amendment and also to the underlying bill, and I join Leader Pelosi and 
my colleagues on this side of the aisle in calling this an 
irresponsible spending bill that threatens job and economic growth, 
hampers our global competitiveness, and harms the people who are 
hurting the most: the working families, the middle class, and the poor.
  This CR targets vulnerable Americans because it would cut funding for 
the things they most desperately need, like food stamps, Head Start, 
and funding to heat their homes, all to keep a reckless tea party-
driven campaign spending cuts goal. And at the end of the day, these 
kinds of hurtful cuts will never get us a balanced budget, and they 
certainly will not secure the kind of future we want for our children 
and grandchildren.
  As one of the five representatives of the people of the U.S. offshore 
territories as well as the ranking member of the subcommittee that has 
jurisdiction over the territories, I am particularly troubled by the 
painful cuts this CR will make to the important programs that the 
people of the territories rely on.
  The bill slashes 8.33 percent from the general technical assistance 
account of the Office of Insular Affairs. Madam Chair, the technical 
assistance program provides support not otherwise available to the 
insular areas to fight such things as the deteriorating fiscal 
conditions which are facing all of the islands and our ability to 
maintain the momentum that has been made in making and sustaining 
systemic changes.

                              {time}  1620

  These funds also support student training programs for high school 
and college students, as well as training for insular professionals in 
financial management, accounting and auditing, as well as other 
programs.
  The program also provides funds to assist the islands in maintaining 
accreditation for our colleges and universities. What is critical about 
this meager program, which has not seen an increase in its budget in 
more than a decade, is that it is funding that the territories could 
not get anywhere else in the Federal Government. Sparing this very 
small but essential program from the majority's indiscriminate, meat 
cleaver approach to budgeting would do infinitely more good than any 
harm it might cause to the budget. After all, the small amount of money 
we're talking about here does not move the meter one blip.
  Madam Chair, the people of the territories recognize that the Federal 
budget cannot sustain the path that it's on, and that reductions in 
spending must be made. But we have done our part and will continue to 
do our part to reduce Federal spending.
  As you look at the budget for the territories, it has not increased 
in several years, and it has been cut for a number of those years. But 
the cuts we're talking about in the CR do not only affect the 
territories. In addition to cutting jobs, there are also disastrous 
cuts that the Republicans are proposing to health-related programs that 
are critical to millions of Americans and are integral to all of our 
efforts to achieve health equity and to eliminate health disparities. 
These health disparities, which we know leave millions of people of 
color, rural Americans, and low-income Americans in poorer health, 
without reliable access to adequate health care, and at greater risk 
for premature death from preventive causes, also cost the Nation a 
great deal from an economic point of view. In fact, we know that 
between 2003 and 2006, the combined direct and indirect cost of health 
disparities and the subsequent premature deaths that often result, the 
cost was $1.24 trillion.
  Rather than base budget cuts on measures that will save human lives 
in addition to precious Federal resources, the Republicans are instead 
proposing cuts that will achieve the exact opposite. We all know from 
their efforts to repeal the landmark health care reform law, a law that 
has already begun to expand access to affordable high quality health 
care to more than 30 million Americans who were in the ranks of the 
uninsured, the Republicans either do not care about the importance of 
ensuring that every American and their families have health care 
coverage, or they do not understand the value of such coverage in 
promoting health, wellness, and thus improving life opportunities, or 
maybe it's both.
  And now, we also know that they don't care about or understand the 
benefits and the needs for the programs and efforts that will 
significantly improve the health and wellness of some of our Nation's 
most vulnerable residents by reducing the very health disparities that 
cost this Nation so much in human lives and in money. In fact, they 
want to cut more than $1 billion from the Nation's community health 
centers, the very centers that provide medical homes to millions of 
hardworking Americans whose health care needs would be poorly addressed 
without them, and to cut $210 million from maternal and child health 
block grant programs, more than $300 million from family planning, and 
$758 million from the WIC program, all of which would have a 
detrimental impact on the health and wellness of women and children and 
young families across this country.
  I urge my colleagues to reject this budget CR which does nothing to 
improve the economy and hurts vulnerable Americans.
  Mr. HINCHEY. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. HINCHEY. Yesterday, as we know, was Valentine's Day, but the 
majority here in Washington is showing no love for the families 
throughout the district that I represent and all across the rest of 
this country.
  The new majority said they would cut wasteful spending. But instead 
they're slashing jobs for police officers, jobs for firefighters, jobs 
for teachers, and many other jobs, all across the country.
  They told us they would work to eliminate needless layers of 
bureaucracy, but instead they're cutting heating assistance for the 
elderly, food aid for young mothers and infants, and college aid for 
15,000 students in the district that I represent and hundreds of 
thousands of other students all across the country.
  They said they would focus on the economy, but instead, they're 
eliminating energy research and development that we need to create 
green jobs and compete with other countries around the world. They're 
sending the workers home on 76 high-speed rail projects underway in 40 
states, all very necessary. This hurts real people. It does nothing to 
address our long-term deficit, and middle class families are the ones 
who pay the price. The American people don't want more hidden cuts and 
budgets tricks. We need a plan. We need a solid, secure positive plan.
  The national debt we hold today was not created over the last 2 
years, as some people are saying. The fiscal crisis we are facing today 
was inherited from the Bush administration. Under the previous 
administration, annual budget surpluses were turned into annual 
deficits. It was Vice President Dick Cheney who said deficits don't 
matter. Clearly, that's a lesson the new

[[Page 1921]]

majority has learned well because while they do cut spending with this 
CR, this bill will undoubtedly worsen our budget deficit. Why? Because 
it will kill hundreds of thousands of jobs. That means more people 
unemployed.
  The people didn't send us here to tend to the needs of Wall Street 
and oil company CEOs. So why does the majority stand against the plan 
to end special tax earmarks that would actually cut the deficit?
  We could be discussing how to end government redtape. For instance, 
in 5 years we could save many billions of dollars by allowing Medicare 
to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for seniors. But instead, 
the majority here wants to cut the administrative budget for Social 
Security. This plan hurts New Yorkers and others all across the 
country. And it hurts the district that I represent. Fifteen thousand 
college students in places like Ithaca and New Paltz will get hurt with 
the maximum Pell Grant falling by $800 as the cost of college continues 
to go up for students all across America.
  And 123,000 low-income pregnant women and new moms in New York will 
get less assistance with the pre- and postnatal nutrition they need. 
That will happen to thousands and thousands of others all across the 
country.
  Nearly 2 million New Yorkers who apply for LIHEAP this year will find 
it harder to heat their homes next year, as will so many thousands of 
others across the country.
  Job training programs like Job Corps in Sullivan County, which will 
help high school dropouts get the training they need to get good jobs, 
will get cut out too.
  Like a blindfolded child at a pinata party, this continuing 
resolution takes a bat to all the wrong things at exactly the wrong 
time. I would urge my colleagues to oppose it.
  Stand up for the American people. Stand up for a real plan to reduce 
the deficit, and fight to save the jobs this country needs so 
desperately.
  Mr. DOLD. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. DOLD. Madam Chair, I appreciate the opportunity to be here. I 
rise in support of the Flake amendment and know that we, at this point 
in time, the American public has asked us to tighten our belt. We have 
to do so. And I believe we have to talk and look at every single 
department, including the Department of Defense. This specific 
amendments deals with a very small amount in the Department of Defense, 
one that Secretary Gates has already outlined and determined that they 
do not need. This will not jeopardize those that are in harm's way. 
This will not jeopardize military preparedness. This is yet one small 
step.
  We have, I think, over 400 amendments today, and I'm delighted that 
those on the other side of the aisle are in support of the Flake 
amendment, and so we certainly look for its passage.
  This right now, what we're talking about in terms of reining in 
spending, is absolutely what the American people demand. Yes, we've had 
spending on both sides of the aisle. Washington has a spending problem. 
We need to cut back on spending. We're spending $1.48 trillion in 
deficit spending, and I think the President's budget actually brings it 
up to $1.6 trillion. That's over $3 million a minute in deficit 
spending.

                              {time}  1630

  I come from the private sector. I run a small business. I understand 
what is going on in the private sector, and I can tell you that out-of-
control spending in Washington does not send the right signal and in 
fact does hurt jobs.
  We have to get our fiscal house in order. This is what this is going 
to attempt to do, and we certainly know that out-of-control spending 
has not been the answer. I urge my colleagues to support the Flake 
amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. WATERS. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Ms. WATERS. Madam Chair, I rise to address what I consider very 
serious problems with this continuing resolution and this defense 
budget and the lack of attention to jobs.
  I am going to talk about something that's quite unpopular. We all 
know that we have 9 percent unemployment in this country, which is 
significant. We all know that communities all over America are 
suffering, not simply rural communities, not simply suburban areas, not 
simply inner cities. But people are hurting, having lost their jobs, 
all over America.
  In some communities, it's not 9 percent, it's not 10 percent, it's 
not even 15 or 20 percent. We have communities in America where there 
is 30 and 40 percent unemployment.
  There are those who would like to say, well, that's in those urban 
areas. No, it is not simply in urban areas. We have poor rural 
communities that have Representatives who come here every day talking 
about they are representing them, when in fact they never speak to the 
needs of those communities. They don't talk about the lack of health 
care that people have had to endure for so many years, the inability 
for people in these rural communities to access clinics. Some of us are 
fighting for all people, not only the cities and the towns, but these 
rural areas that are being hurt so badly.
  Now, it is not popular to even use the word ``poor.'' As a matter of 
fact, you hear over and over again about concerns for the middle class. 
Of course, we are all concerned for the middle class. But who 
represents the poor people in America these days? There are some of us 
who do, and proudly so, and we are referred to as ``big spenders.'' Tax 
and spend, they say. And they don't talk about the poverty in their own 
community.
  But let me just tell you, with this continuing resolution the CDBG, 
Community Development Block Grant, money is going to hurt all of these 
communities across America. Many of these Representatives who support 
cutting CDBG from $4.45 billion down to $1.5 billion are going to hurt 
their cities. Their mayors are absolutely going nuts about what is 
happening with the cutting of CDBG, the last block grant funding that 
they can depend on to assist with economic development that helps to 
create jobs in America.
  You hear a lot about that we care about jobs. Well, we know what 
people care about jobs based on where they place their priorities. My 
friends are cutting in areas where we could be creating jobs and have 
demonstrated that they have zero bills to create jobs. The mindless 
cuts that they are proposing means 1 million job cuts: no jobs for 
nurses, teachers, police, firefighters, manufacturing, small 
businesses.
  We need to put America back to work, and we can do this if we are 
sensible, if we are targeting the cuts in areas that can take it.
  Why are we spending the amount that we are spending on the military 
budget and defense budget when we have those who are telling us--for 
example, Secretary Gates announced his intention to terminate the 
expeditionary fighting vehicle program and the surface launch medium-
range air-to-air missile system. Why are we trying to disregard what we 
have been told by the very people who understand this defense budget 
better than anybody else?
  No, we want to continue to fund a budget that doesn't need any 
funding, not talking about how we reduce and eliminate the funding for 
Afghanistan and bring our soldiers home and put that money into our own 
domestic needs. We are talking about somehow cutting in ways that they 
would have people believe that they are helping them when in fact they 
are hurting them.
  This continuing resolution does nothing for strengthening the 
economy. It does nothing for creating jobs. It does nothing for support 
of those cities who are fighting desperately to hold on to 
opportunities for people who have nowhere else to turn. Not only do we 
have the cuts in areas that would create jobs, but also many of these 
areas are faced with foreclosures.
  Ms. CHU. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.

[[Page 1922]]

  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Ms. CHU. Madam Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment because 
it doesn't do anything to create jobs. Of course, I shouldn't be 
surprised. Over the last 6 weeks since the Republicans took over 
control of the House, they haven't created a single job. In fact, they 
haven't even put a single jobs bill on the House floor.
  With this mindless job-killing Republican spending bill, they are 
hurting the American people. This bill senselessly cuts over 1 million 
jobs at a time when we need them most, at a time when we can least 
afford it. This is nothing more than a Republican pink slip for 
America.
  This bill doesn't get our broken American economy back on track. 
Instead, Republicans are hitting American workers where it hurts. These 
merciless Republican cuts mean, if you work in manufacturing, no jobs; 
if you are a cop, no jobs; if you are a nurse, no jobs; if you are a 
teacher, no jobs; if you are a firefighter, no jobs; if you are a 
construction worker, no jobs.
  Republicans aren't just ignoring jobs. They are slashing them. And 
that means pink slips for Americans across the country and across 
almost every industry. If we aren't helping real Americans, where is 
this money going? Right into the pockets of big defense contractors.
  While Americans across the country are finding themselves out of work 
due to mindless Republican spending cuts, the military industrial 
complex will actually be making more money.
  While they slash jobs and safety net programs, Republicans are 
actually increasing funding to the Department of Defense by $10 
billion. This spending is excessive and way out of proportion with the 
needs of the American people.
  Even Defense Secretary Gates has found $100 billion in cuts and 
savings to the Department of Defense while still keeping America safe. 
That's the entire cost of the job-killing cuts Republicans are asking 
for here today.
  Instead of expanding our economy and growing the middle class, 
Republicans want to make you, the American people, pay. They want to 
make you pay to line the pockets of defense contractors, make you pay 
for Big Oil's billion-dollar subsidies, make you pay for higher drug 
prices, make you pay taxes to start a small business, make you pay for 
CEO salaries, make you take a hit while Wall Street gets a bonus. We 
need to look out for constituents first, not corporate friends.
  And this bill isn't even about reducing deficits, because we all know 
that the best way to reduce the deficit is to put Americans to work, 
not carelessly gut government programs. Instead, we need to rebuild 
America and focus on winning the future.
  Today's bill is a choice between cutting the deficit or putting 
Americans back to work, and I am voting for jobs. We need to invest in 
our Nation so that we can out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the 
rest of the world. I want to see the words ``Made in America'' again.
  The American people voted for jobs, and all they are getting with 
this gutting and slashing funding proposal are pink slips. This is a 
heartless and careless plan that cuts real American jobs and hurts real 
American families.
  I yield back the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1640

  Mr. GARAMENDI. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. GARAMENDI. Madam Chair, the amendment before us is a start. 
Eighteen million dollars out of $720 billion is a start. You might take 
it one step forward and let's end the war in Afghanistan where we're 
spending $120 billion and another $30 billion or so in Iraq. Now we've 
got some real money to talk about.
  Because this is a start, I find that it's an unworthy start, and, 
therefore, I oppose the amendment. However, the real issue before 
America is not how we can slash and burn in foolish ways that actually 
lose tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, indeed a million jobs in 
the next 7 months, which is the proposal before us with this continuing 
resolution that the Republican Caucus has put on the floor. It seems to 
me that if we wanted to create jobs, we certainly wouldn't, as a first 
step, lose a million jobs in virtually every sector of the economy:
  Teachers that are providing services for the early childhood 
education programs, Head Start, they'll lose their jobs.
  Firefighters; 2,400 or more of them will lose their job across the 
Nation. The COPS program, which has provided jobs for police in our 
cities, they'll lose their jobs, some 1,300. They just had men and 
women from my own district come in and say, Why would they want to do 
that? Why would they want to take cops off the street? I told them, I 
don't know. I don't understand.
  I don't understand this CR. It is the most foolish, nonsensical 
slash-and-burn I have ever seen. I was in the Department of the 
Interior in the mid nineties when we actually reduced in a thoughtful 
way over a 4-year period of time the number of employees by some 
12,000--from 90,000 down to the 70,000 range. We did it. And we 
continued to do the services. But you don't slash and burn. You don't 
just in a wholesale manner carry out a political promise of $100 
billion and foist it upon the American public in this way where we lose 
a million jobs, where we lose critical services.
  California has been in a water war for generations. We rely upon the 
Bureau of Reclamation. We rely upon recycling. We rely upon these 
programs. And yet you slash those, and those are real jobs and real 
programs to deal with the water problems in the West. Why would you do 
that? What's the point of that? Why would you go into programs where we 
need to educate?
  My daughter is a second grade teacher. She now has 32 kids in her 
elementary program; an almost impossible situation. And your cuts that 
you're proposing will make that situation worse. She cried out to me 
this week, Why are they doing that, Dad? I said, for some political 
promise made in a campaign without any thinking about the impact that 
it has on real human beings, real students, who are trying to get an 
education.
  My final point is this. There are five things that lead to true 
economic growth. The best education system in the world, and so this CR 
cuts education. The best research in the world, and so this CR cuts 
research programs in science, in energy, in health care. The best 
infrastructure, and this CR cuts infrastructure expenditures. 
Manufacturing matters; we have to make it in America. You cut out those 
programs that assist manufacturing. And, finally, we know that we have 
to have an energy policy and you destroy the beginnings of a green 
energy, self-sustaining energy program in this Nation.
  Why would you do so many foolish things? I don't get it. Perhaps it's 
because your real agenda is the no-jobs agenda.
  Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Thank you, Madam Chair.
  Madam Chair, we've had promise after promise after promise after 
promise that the Republicans were going to pay attention to what the 
people wanted. And what the people want is jobs, jobs, jobs.
  I rise in opposition to this amendment, Madam Chair. I want to point 
out that these Republican cuts that have been proposed are draconian, 
they are extremist, they are bad for America. They are bad for our 
economic recovery. Everybody knows that we just came out of the worst 
recession since the Great Depression. We call it the Great Recession. 
We're just coming out of it, even though most Americans don't feel it 
yet. Certainly those folk up on Wall Street who got the bailouts, they 
feel the recovery, and they are back to the huge bonuses and salaries. 
They are looking at this Republican Congress to release them from all 
of the regulatory measures that the Democrats put in place over the 
last 2 years so that they can continue to party. And while they party, 
their

[[Page 1923]]

friends here in Congress on the Republican side of the aisle are busy 
trying to balance the budget on the backs of working men and women in 
this country. That's what the CR proposal is all about.
  It came out on Friday at 8 p.m.; they issued their plan, and here we 
are on Tuesday arguing the merits--or demerits, actually--of this plan 
that is nothing other than a plan that undermines America's future. 
This plan is going to cause severe job cuts which will hurt our 
economic recovery.
  It is ironic that as reported in the Wall Street Journal, a new Wall 
Street Journal survey of economists shows that they expect the economy 
to expand at the fastest pace since 2003--a recovery that would be 
certainly jeopardized, snuffed out, by this GOP plan. This is going to 
cut at least 300,000 private sector jobs, according to an analysis by 
staff at the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. These cuts, 
by the way, these 300,000 cuts are less than half of the total 
infrastructure cuts in the bill. These Republican cuts in investments 
in roads, bridges, transit and rail include a cut of $1.4 billion in 
clean water State revolving loan fund moneys, which is $23 million for 
Georgia; and include a cut of $6.3 billion in high-speed intercity rail 
funding. That's going to cause people to not be able to go out and work 
to make that investment in America's future a reality.

                              {time}  1650

  A $75 million cut in the TIGER II Program, those are transit 
projects, is what will happen in Georgia, just in the State of Georgia. 
So we are talking about massive job losses, 300,000 just with 
transportation and infrastructure projects, Madam Chairman. The 
consequence of that extends into our future. It is actually strangling 
the future of millions of Americans, both working and poor people.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. CAMPBELL. Madam Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number 
of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. CAMPBELL. Madam Chairman, I won't take anywhere near that time, 
just simply to get back to the amendment offered by the gentleman from 
Arizona, Mr. Flake, which is the matter before us right now, and to say 
that I support this amendment, Madam Chairman.
  The gentleman has very properly, I think, brought up something that 
the Secretary of Defense has said is one of the areas in which the 
defense budget can be reduced and we can save money. The greatest 
threat to the national security of this country today is our debt. The 
Secretary of Defense has said that. He has said certainly it is a 
national security threat, as has the Secretary of State. So we need to 
get this debt down, we need to get this deficit down, we need to do it 
in every single area of the budget.
  I think the gentleman from Arizona's amendment is very proper and a 
very appropriate one, and I support it.
  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Madam Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number 
of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Madam Chairman, I rise to, first of all, support the 
Flake amendment but also to oppose the underlying bill and the drastic 
cuts that will devastate the most vulnerable citizens in our Nation.
  Just to highlight some of these cuts, the bill will cut $25 million 
from the Ryan White HIV-AIDS Program and the Aides Drug Assistance 
Program, ADAP. Now, ADAP is a program of last resort for the poorest 
Americans who don't qualify for Medicaid or Medicare. Currently there 
is a waiting list of over 6,000 people in 10 States to receive benefits 
from this program.
  And $850 million in reductions to the CDC, an organization whose 
first task is to defend us against disease and infection, $850 million. 
That is smart. Let's just cut and make America more vulnerable.
  The bill cuts $1.6 billion in funding for NIH, so I guess we won't 
need any research since we are going to let the diseases run rampant in 
America.
  It goes so far as to say in the District of Columbia, we are even 
going to tell you how to spend your very last dollar.
  But it gets better. Community Health Centers, Community Health 
Centers, where the most vulnerable are treated for their health, $1.3 
billion in cuts. Community Health Centers will lose the capacity to 
serve 11 million patients over the next year, and well over 3.3 million 
current patients will lose their care within the next few months.
  The bill cuts $5 billion from the Pell Grants. I did hear that there 
were a lot of new millionaires elected to the Congress of the United 
States, so I imagine they can pay for their children's education. But 
maybe we should think about people that don't have the median income of 
Members of Congress, people who don't make $175,000 a year, which puts 
all of us in the top 1 percent of wage earners.
  What about the most humble and the poorest and those who wish to 
aspire one day to lead this great Nation of ours? Shouldn't they be 
given an opportunity? Not under this program. Let's cut the program, 
the basic program that allows young men and women to seek a college 
education, the Pell Grant. Let's eliminate billions of dollars from 
there also.
  But wait, $25 billion to the Federal TRIO Program. That is for the 
first generation. That is the first kid in a family where nobody has 
gone to college. Let's cut from that program too.
  The program cuts $25 million from GEAR UP. And, wait, $1 billion from 
Head Start?
  I am just going to end with this. I want the public to understand 
this. We get great health care here, excellent health care. It is not 
free, but we get great health care. About $400, that is what they 
deduct from my check. My wife gets good health care, my daughter gets 
good health care, and so do every one of you get good health care. 
Shame on anybody that would adopt this kind of budget, knowing very 
well the kind of great health care that we get. Cut your health care 
first before you cut the health care of the most poorest, the most 
vulnerable in this Nation.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. ELLISON. I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Minnesota is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. ELLISON. Madam Chairman, I rise in support of Mr. Flake's 
amendment to cut wasteful defense spending. Unfortunately, the 
underlying bill is just another part of the Republican no jobs agenda. 
Since the Republican caucus has taken over the majority, they haven't 
put one jobs bill on. I mean, they haven't done a poor job--they 
haven't done anything. It is as if they are not in favor of Americans 
having jobs. We know they are, but they haven't demonstrated it in 
anything they have done, which is the important thing.
  Instead, as part of the Republican no jobs agenda, they bring up a 
bill to cut 1 million jobs, cut 1 million jobs from the American middle 
class. These cuts are Republican answers for the job crisis that they 
created. Cutting 1 million jobs. If you are a nurse, no jobs. If you 
are a teacher, no jobs. If you are a firefighter or police officer, no 
jobs. If your jobs are from American manufacturing, no jobs. And if you 
are a small business person, who is going to have any money to even go 
into your store? No jobs for them either. The list goes on and on.
  If you want to know how we cut the deficit, it is by putting America 
to work, not by cutting Social Security. Make no mistake: When the 
Republicans say they are cutting costs, they are cutting Social 
Security, they are cutting Medicare, they are cutting Medicaid, until 
they cease to exist. Republicans want working Americans to shoulder the 
whole burden, the burden of a taxpayer-funded spending spree for the 
rich while protecting millionaires and billionaires who refuse to pay 
their fair share.
  The Republican answer to the crisis they created is, you pay, 
American people. They must make you pay for

[[Page 1924]]

Big Oil's billion dollar subsidies. They want to make you pay for 
higher drug prices. They want to make you pay for taxes to start a 
small business. They want to make you pay for CEO bonuses. They want 
Main Street to take the hit while Wall Street gets a bonus.
  While Democrats work to create jobs, reduce the deficit, and rebuild 
America, Republican Speaker John Boehner said, so be it if we lose 
hundreds of thousands of jobs.
  Is that what the American people said they wanted in November? The 
American people want Republican leaders to look out for constituents 
first, not corporate friends. And now the American people are saying, 
show us the jobs.
  We have been seeing a no jobs agenda, a jobless agenda. Forty days in 
the majority, and nothing to create jobs. No jobs for the American 
people. Madam Chairman, we need to make this change.
  Will the Republican caucus even today, Madam Chairman, say you know 
what, we are not going to cut 1 million people, 1 million public 
employees out of work. We are going to actually do something to create 
jobs? It appears not, Madam Chairman.
  What we need to do is withdraw some of these massive oil subsidies. 
What we need to do is save some money by not rewarding the wealthiest 
among us and industries who have not been responsible corporate 
citizens and actually use it to put Americans back to work so that they 
can pay some taxes and actually reduce this deficit.
  Make no mistake about it, Madam Chairman, we are concerned about the 
deficit: $200 billion of it goes to interest on the debt. That money 
could be going to programs that help people, to help children, to help 
seniors, that can make and strengthen and improve our infrastructure 
and our country. But instead it goes to this massive debt, built up by 
Republicans with their massive tax cuts to the rich, two wars and a big 
pharma giveaway. They created the problem. Now when we try to solve it, 
they want to put us back in the hole.

                              {time}  1700

  So, Madam Chair, I want to say that if this country--our country--has 
a deficit to fix, let's fix it by a bold, creative, courageous vision 
of America where we create infrastructure, we create work, we create 
jobs, rather than just cutting back the social safety net and taking 
away what little people have. We need to stop the Republican no-jobs 
agenda.
  I yield back.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas. Madam Chair, I move to strike the requisite 
number of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas. Madam Chair, sometimes this is a complex 
debate when we hear words like ``CR'' to a lot of our voters and others 
who are paying attention to the work that they have sent us here to do. 
And a lot of times they try to ensure that we use vernacular that, what 
does it mean? We're in the budget year of 2012 or budget year 2011 or 
we're doing a CR. I think the plain and simple of it is we're trying to 
ensure that what you are getting now if you're on a job, if you're a 
police officer, that we don't turn the lights out on you. And my 
concern is to let you know that we have been steadily improving. The 
private sector has been creating jobs under the Democratic policies 
under President Obama's guidance and, frankly, under this new budget 
that we'll debate--that is not what we're debating today--that speaks 
about competitiveness and speaks about infrastructure rebuild, putting 
Americans to work.
  So my gripe with the CR that my friends on the other side of the 
aisle have now put forward is that they originally came up with a $60- 
to $74 billion--maybe a thoughtful analysis of what we could cut. 
Remember, this is in the middle of you working and all of a sudden 
somebody comes and gives you a pink slip. But rather than stick with 
what might have been a thoughtful analysis--and, again, I had not 
studied it; it had not been introduced--all of a sudden they go by the 
``We have to be dominated by voices of which force us, without thought, 
to now make it a hundred billion dollars.''
  I'm as angry about the deficit and want a strong budget, which we're 
not doing right now, and want to work with my good ranking member, 
chairman of the Defense Subcommittee in the last Congress, Mr. Dicks, 
on a thoughtful passage going forward, but I want to make sure we stay 
on a pathway of creating jobs.
  There is something to cutting spending. You have my commitment. We 
came out with a compromise 2 months ago, in December. Some of us 
agreed; some of us did not. But there were sizable tax cuts. I voted 
for tax cuts before. But let me tell you why what we're doing today is 
enormously dangerous: 1,330 cops will be off the street; 2,400 fewer 
firefighters will be off the street; we will take teachers out of 
classrooms and lose 25,000 new construction jobs.
  There is a provision in the CR that wants to rescind stimulus 
dollars--sounds like a bad thing--but those dollars are in the pipeline 
for construction projects where men and women of America are working 
and feeding their families. Does that make sense, dollars that they pay 
taxes back to this country?
  I don't understand a plan that takes from the working man and woman 
in this country. I don't understand a plan, for example, that takes 
$2.5 billion away from high-speed rail, which all over America there 
has been a sense of inspiration about moving us to more efficient 
transportation. But the number of jobs to be created cannot be counted. 
That's an investment in this country. Or do you want to undermine the 
air traffic control system and begin to trouble America's airways? I 
sit on the Homeland Security Committee, chair the Transportation 
Security Committee. I am very hesitant to make a willy-nilly cut to the 
FAA.
  And so what disturbs me is: Why could we jump or why did we jump or 
how do we jump in 48 hours from $60 million to $74 million of which 
they said they were cutting? This is a continuing resolution, which 
means it allows the government, in essence, to keep going on what we 
are ongoing with. It means people are out there working, doing the 
bidding of the American people. And, before you know it, because there 
were complaints and people talking about what they campaigned on, and 
all of a sudden it's a $100 billion cut with no thought.
  Now, I respect people being elected by their constituents, but it is 
interesting when you read polling numbers from individuals who happen 
to come from that background of the tea party that want to cut 
everything, and you ask them about something in their jurisdiction. 
Say, for example, an Air Force base. The polling numbers show, Don't 
cut my Air Force base, but you can cut somebody else's.
  So here's my concern, Madam Chair. How do you cut Juvenile Justice 
and the COPS program? How do you cut the Justice Department for all of 
the voting rights enforcement?
  I want to stay on a path. This CR is not a pathway of creating jobs; 
it's no jobs, and it stops America in her tracks. Let's stay on track 
and keep investing in jobs in America.
  Ms. EDWARDS. Madam Chair, I rise to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Maryland is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Ms. EDWARDS. Madam Chair, I rise today because I want to express my 
concern that I think of the House of Representatives as a place that 
involves a lot of critical thinking about the work that we do, but the 
continuing resolution in front of us is neither critical nor 
thoughtful. It eliminates the COPS program.
  Let me tell you about the COPS program, not just around the country 
where it's going to result in firing 1,330 law enforcement officers, 
but in one of the counties that I represent where we have had, 
unfortunately, 18 homicides since the beginning of the year, where we 
need every law enforcement officer on the beat. Fifty of those officers 
come from the COPS program. We would lose those officers under this 
continuing resolution.

[[Page 1925]]

  Looking at the firing of our firefighters, these are firefighters, 
first responders out there whenever they're called in every one of our 
communities across the country, 2,400 of them.
  Sometimes, Madam Chair, we speak in numbers that are so extraordinary 
that ordinary Americans don't understand them. But I think with respect 
to this continuing resolution, ordinary Americans understand that under 
the resolution 200,000 students--that's pre-kindergartners--will be 
kicked out of Head Start just when we need to give these students a 
start so that we can grow them and educate them so they're competitive 
in the 21st century. We're not doing that. Instead, 200,000 students in 
every State of this country kicked out of Head Start, thousands of 
teachers who teach them.
  This brings me to another cut, a number that the American people 
understands, Madam Chair--$845. $845 is the amount that would be cut 
from the Pell Grant program; $845, for those of us who sent a child to 
college, is the cost of books for the semester.
  Madam Chair, I am so shocked by these cuts that I think across this 
country, the students, if they're not going to get their $845 to buy 
their books, maybe they should send the bill to Speaker Boehner, send 
their book bill to the Speaker.
  I am challenged to understand these cuts, because when I think about 
an $845 cut to Pell Grants, in my State that's 123,000 students. Madam 
Chair, in Michigan, it's 646,000 students; in Arizona, it's 340,000 
students; millions of students across the country who lose $845 that 
allows them to buy their biology books, their economics books, their 
math books, the things that will enable them to be competitive in this 
century. So, like many Americans, I really don't get that. It is 
neither thoughtful nor critical.
  This cut would mean $2.5 billion in cuts to the National Institutes 
of Health for cancer research and for other diseases that plague our 
country and send our health care costs skyrocketing. We want to cut 
scientists and researchers and medical professionals who are trying to 
cure the great diseases of our time?

                              {time}  1710

  I don't understand it, and I don't think the American public 
understands it.
  And $1.4 billion in cuts for science and energy research, the very 
thing that will make us competitive in this next generation. The 
American people don't understand that.
  Children, 200,000 of them, in Head Start. Firefighters, 2,400 of 
them. Police officers, 1,330 of them; 123,000 students in the State of 
Maryland losing their 845 lousy dollars to buy their books.
  Madam Chair, I have to tell you that I think, like many of us in this 
Congress, we know that we need to bring spending under control, but it 
cannot be at the expense of working people. It cannot be at the expense 
of poor people. So it is a sad day in the United States when this 
Congress has exercised neither critique nor thought in bringing cuts 
that will devastate the American people and result in no job creation 
yet again for the last 45 days of this Congress.
  With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. DICKS. Madam Chair, I want to remind everyone that we are on the 
Defense appropriations bill. This is the Flake amendment, and we have 
cut approximately $15 billion from this defense bill. I understand that 
there is a lot of concern about the other items here, but I just wanted 
to make that point.
  I yield to the gentleman from Florida if he has anything he wants to 
say at this point.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Madam Chair, America is at war. We have soldiers fighting, losing 
their lives, having serious injuries not only in Afghanistan but in 
Iraq and, before that, in Kosova and in Bosnia. We have known war for a 
long time, and cutting the defense budget was unheard of. Yet the 
subcommittee has been able to recommend $14.8 billion in a very short 
period of time that we don't think has any negative effect on the 
national defense.
  The idea of the Flake amendment may be a good idea. The subcommittee 
would like to be able to analyze it to make sure that it doesn't have 
any kind of a negative effect. It may be, as we go through our process 
for this year, that we would include that, but the subcommittee would 
very much like to have an opportunity to review this recommendation by 
the Flake amendment.
  Mr. SARBANES. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. SARBANES. I wanted to speak to the underlying CR, H.R. 1.
  Madam Chair, in particular I want to speak to the fact that the 
American people have been very clear in their understanding that what 
we need to do is rebuild the country and that we need to rebuild 
America. Yet everything that is being proposed by the Republicans in 
this continuing resolution undermines that goal.
  Rebuilding America means rebuilding our infrastructure, and we can 
talk about that infrastructure in a number of different ways. We can 
talk about rebuilding and investing in our physical infrastructure. 
That's roads, bridges, tunnels, highways, and building up the strength 
of our physical infrastructure, which we all know we have to do. All 
you have to do is look at the newspaper or watch television, and you 
will see examples every day of the crumbling infrastructure out there. 
So we have got to commit to that, but the Republican budget would 
undermine that objective.
  We have to rebuild the civic infrastructure of this country and keep 
it strong. What do I mean by the ``civic infrastructure''? I am talking 
about service programs like AmeriCorps and the Corporation for National 
and Community Service, which creates an infrastructure that says to 
those people who want to volunteer and serve their country--1,000 
points of light--we are here to partner with you in doing that. Yet the 
Republican proposal would zero out that civic infrastructure.
  It's about investing in human infrastructure and building up human 
capital. That's education and health care and job training and 
innovation and technology. That's what human capital and human 
infrastructure is about. Yet we can look through this budget and find 
examples of cutting those priorities as well.
  How does that build up America? That tears America down. It doesn't 
build it up.
  As for the last piece of this, if you're going to make America strong 
and keep it strong, you've got to preserve the natural resources of 
this country. I looked at a couple of the numbers here in terms of 
what's being done that would hurt our environment under the proposal. 
I'll just mention a couple of them.
  Cutting the Environmental Protection Agency by 29 percent, a $3 
billion proposed cut. Now, how are you going to protect the environment 
if you cut by almost a third the agency whose mission it is to do that? 
That's essentially giving a free license to the polluters of America. 
That's an unconscionable proposal.
  I come from Maryland. We care about the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. 
It has been a national commitment to preserve this national treasure, 
the Chesapeake Bay. Last year, through an executive order, the 
President made it a priority. There are partnerships at the Federal, 
State and local levels and with the private sector to try to save and 
protect the Chesapeake Bay, but these proposals would undermine that.
  Cutting over $1.7 billion from the Clean Water and Drinking Water 
State Revolving Funds. In Maryland, that would cost 1,000 jobs. This is 
an important source of financing for people to implement best practices 
to clean up the Chesapeake Bay. Why would we undermine that?
  There are other elements with respect to our natural resources. We've 
got to enforce pollution standards. The EPA is in a position to do 
that, but not if we cut their funding. This would endanger rivers and 
streams that feed the Chesapeake Bay.

[[Page 1926]]

  The last observation I would make, and this is sort of the 
overarching concern that I have, is that I really believe in the idea 
of citizen stewardship, in the idea that ordinary citizens step forward 
every day and decide they're going to commit themselves to cleaning up 
the environment. Our young people are committed to that, the next 
generation; but they want to see that the Federal Government is going 
to be a real partner in that effort. If we abdicate that 
responsibility, then there are going to be a lot of young people, a lot 
of ordinary citizens, who are going to get disillusioned in terms of 
their own commitment to cleaning up the environment.
  We need to step forward. We need to stay strong and be a partner in 
protecting our environment; but what the Republicans have proposed in 
this continuing resolution would completely undermine that.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. NORTON. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from the District of Columbia is 
recognized for 5 minutes.
  Ms. NORTON. Madam Chair, the underlying bill is a special insult to 
the Americans who voted for the new majority on the promise of jobs. 
They might forgive that the mjority does not know how to produce jobs 
or that they haven't produced jobs yet, but they will never understand 
a bill that will make history on the number of jobs it affirmatively 
destroys.
  The deficit commission warned about cuts that are at the centerpiece 
of the majority's bill, cuts that don't distinguish between short-term 
and long-term deficits, between the job-producing role of government 
investment during an economic turndown and the needed savings to reduce 
the long-term deficit, which must go on simultaneously; but the 
majority loses its focus entirely with its obsession on snatching local 
authority, over local funds from the District of Columbia.
  While the majority wants to make draconian cuts in most Federal 
programs, putting at high risk the economy itself, it simultaneously 
expands Federal power into the local funds and affairs of a local 
jurisdiction, the District of Columbia. Three riders in this bill are 
anti-self-government, having nothing to do with the underlying bill or 
the Federal Government.

                              {time}  1720

  Particularly cruel, apart from the home-rule violation, is the 
attempt to reimpose a provision that would keep the District of 
Columbia from spending its own local funds on needle exchange programs. 
If this is reimposed, a rider I got off during the last few years, it 
will cost lives and spread HIV, as it did for the prior 10 years.
  But they're not through there. The majority takes a hard-line 
approach, even when I asked for and was denied the right to testify 
before the Judiciary Committee on yet another rider, a rider that would 
keep local District of Columbia funds from being spent on abortions for 
poor women. What business is it of any Member of this body how the 
District of Columbia spends its own money, which it raises from its own 
residents and businesses?
  Madam Chair, they go further. They try to reestablish a voucher 
program in the District, ignoring a compromise reached last Congress to 
allow every child now with a private school voucher to remain in the 
program until graduation. It disregards the fact that the District has 
the largest public charter school alternative in the United States. 
Almost half of our children attend these schools. If the majority wants 
to give money for alternatives to public schools, then they've got to 
respect our choice.
  Republican support for vouchers--only in the District of Columbia--
exposes them for where they really stand on vouchers and school choice. 
There is wholesale support in this body for public charter schools. 
They will not bring a voucher bill for the Nation to the floor because 
polls and referenda in the States show there is zero national support 
for private school vouchers. Instead, Republicans single out the 
District and only the District, ignoring the city's own extraordinary, 
flowering public charter school program. Our choice, not someone else's 
who has nothing to do with us.
  You cannot try on this floor to slash Federal power while dictating 
local policy and how local money should be spent. Those two don't go 
together.
  Mr. COHEN. Madam Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. COHEN. I rise in opposition to this amendment.
  I could spend my time talking about the cuts to the Low Income 
Heating and Energy Program, LIHEAP, and that's important because there 
are many people in my district suffering through the worst winter in 
Memphis' recent history and one of the worst winters in the country's 
history that need help with their utility bills more than ever. And 
that's, I think, an awful thing when people are suffering from the 
inability to pay their utility bills that we're cutting LIHEAP.
  I could talk about what we're doing to law enforcement, cutting the 
COPS program that puts police on the street and helps local government 
put new policemen on the street to protect our people, and cuts to 
State law enforcement spending.
  I could talk about the many calls and letters I've gotten from people 
concerned about title X cuts that will affect 5,500 in my community, 
women that won't be able to get family planning services, which include 
cancer screenings, annual exams in my city.
  I could talk about cuts to NPR, cuts to the National Institutes of 
Health, where they're looking for cures for cancer and Alzheimer's and 
diabetes and other illnesses that affect our populace which we need to 
cure as soon as possible. Or cuts to the FDA, $241 million to keep our 
food safe and preserve public health.
  Or cuts to Social Security and Medicaid. A gentleman stopped me 
Saturday and said, please, you tell the people in Washington, don't 
mess with our Social Security and Medicaid, but there are great cuts 
there as well.
  Or the $18 billion cut to transportation--and Memphis is a 
transportation hub with rails and roadways and runways and river 
transportation, and $18 billion in cuts to transportation is going to 
hurt the growth of our economy and sending goods to market.
  I could talk about any of those items. I could talk about the cuts to 
legal services and the fact that more and more people need legal 
services in these economic times. The housing crisis hasn't left us, 
and people need representation.
  I could talk about cuts to education in historically black colleges 
and universities and Head Start programs. How are we going to compete, 
which we are not doing well in science and math, with the Chinese and 
the Indians if we cut these programs? I could talk about any and all 
those programs.
  But one thing I want to do is I want to read a column called ``Eat 
the Future,'' and Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, wrote 
this. So I just think it's worthy to listen and have it heard on this 
floor what Mr. Krugman said yesterday, Nobel Prize-winning economist.
  ``On Friday, House Republicans unveiled their proposal for immediate 
cuts in Federal spending. Characteristically, they failed to accompany 
the release with a catchy slogan. So I'd like to propose one: Eat the 
Future.
  ``I'll explain in a minute. First, let's talk about the dilemma the 
GOP faces.
  ``Republican leaders like to claim that the midterms gave them a 
mandate for sharp cuts in government spending. Some of us believe that 
the elections were less about spending than they were about persistent 
high unemployment, but whatever. The key point to understand is that 
while many voters say that they want lower spending, press the issue a 
bit further and it turns out that they only want to cut spending on 
other people.
  ``That's the lesson from a new survey by the Pew Research Center, in 
which Americans were asked whether they favored higher or lower 
spending in a variety of areas. It turns out that they want more, not 
less, spending on most things, including education and Medicare. 
They're evenly divided about

[[Page 1927]]

spending on aid to the unemployed and--surprise--defense.
  ``The only thing they clearly want to cut is foreign aid, which most 
Americans believe, wrongly, accounts for a large share of the Federal 
budget.
  ``Pew also asked people how they would like to see the States close 
their budget deficits. Do they favor cuts in either education or health 
care, the main expenses States face? No. Do they favor tax increases? 
No. The only deficit-reduction measure with significant support was 
cuts in public-employee pensions--and even there the public was evenly 
divided.
  ``The moral is clear. Republicans don't have a mandate to cut 
spending; they have a mandate to repeal the laws of arithmetic.
  ``How can voters be so ill informed? In their defense, bear in mind 
that they have jobs, children to raise, parents to take care of. They 
don't have the time or the incentive to study the Federal budget, let 
alone State budgets . . . So they rely on what they hear from seemingly 
authoritative figures.
  ``And what they've been hearing ever since Ronald Reagan is their 
hard-earned dollars are going to waste, paying for vast armies of 
useless bureaucrats--payroll is only 5 percent of Federal spending''--
and others.
  The bottom line is they've been hearing lies about the Federal 
budget. They've been hearing lies about the Federal bureaucracy. 
PolitiFact said that the biggest lie in 2009 was death panels. In 2010, 
it was government takeover of health care. If the Republicans get 
PolitiFact's Lie of the Year this year, they will get the Irving 
Thalberg lifetime achievement award. I hope they don't get it.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Madam Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Hawaii is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Ms. HANABUSA. Madam Chair, I don't believe there's anyone in this 
body who doesn't believe we must get ahold of our budget. I don't 
believe that there's anyone in this body who doesn't feel that when we 
do that, we've got to keep in mind that we serve the people, and we 
also must keep in mind that the one thing that we all are here to do is 
not to make their lives worse but to try to make their lives better, 
and in addition to that, we are here to try to build that public 
confidence which is the only way we will see the rise in our economy.
  Madam Chair, when I looked at the amendment, the thing that struck me 
the most is that in my district, there was a provision in here that 
zeros out what is called the Native Hawaiian Housing Block Grant. It 
goes to zero. It's at $13 million now. In that same section, it also 
zeros out the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Public and 
Indian Housing revitalization of severely distressed public housing. It 
zeros out the Department of Housing and Urban Development's public and 
Indian housing. It zeros out the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development's community planning and development brownfields 
redevelopment, just to name some of the programs that have been zeroed 
out.

                              {time}  1730

  Let me tell you about the program of native Hawaiians. This is a 
program that, in our difficult economic times, managed to build, 
managed to build roads, managed to build programs. This is a program 
that was leveraged, leveraged so we had construction projects going, so 
we had housing developments going, and we have zeroed them out, $13 
million, zeroed them out.
  When we start to look at the budget and we start to think about what 
we must cut, the one thing I would like to think that we put a lot of 
credence in is which one of these programs is being leveraged and doing 
what we want.
  In addition to that, Madam Chair, look at community health systems. 
Everyone knows the Hawaiian Islands are islands. The only mode of 
transportation for our people between islands is expensive airfare. We 
don't have a ferry system. We definitely don't have roads that join our 
islands. It's airlines. For the underserved, they have to fly for 
health care. So community health systems, when we cut $1 billion out of 
that budget, $1 billion, imagine what that means for the provision of 
one of the most essential, essential parts of a person's life, the 
feeling of knowing that you have health care, and we have cut that out 
of the budget. It's not only Hawaii; it's elsewhere. But think about 
what that means.
  And for small communities who rely on CDBG, the Community Development 
Block Grant program, we've cut it approximately $2.5 billion. Why? That 
is what gets services to the people. This is what we have.
  We have already discussed the fact many times that we are cutting 
Head Start. There are 200,000 young kids who are not going to get that 
opportunity.
  We are cutting the Pell Grants, and that, of course, is going to make 
a reduction of about $800 per middle class family.
  These are all part of this amendment as well.
  But for myself, as someone who represents this State that's gotten 
zeroed out on a program that has done exactly--exactly--what government 
wants to see done, which is to make jobs, to give opportunities, we 
have cut it. Now, why would we do that? That is because we have not 
taken into consideration or remembered what we are here to do. We are 
here to serve the people, Madam Chair.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. CICILLINE. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Rhode Island is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. CICILLINE. I rise in support of this amendment but to oppose the 
underlying Republican continuing resolution.
  The spending bill before us is born out of an ideology that cuts 
right to the heart of our values as a country, and our priorities, too. 
Because that is what a budget is supposed to reflect: our values and 
priorities as a nation. Our priorities are to strengthen the middle 
class, to reduce the deficit, and to create jobs.
  And we can see very clearly where my colleagues on the other side of 
the aisle have placed their priorities. It's not in the well-being of 
our workforce, not in the effectiveness of our classrooms, not in the 
safety of our neighborhoods. The priorities of the majority party are 
not with the people who have worked hard all of their lives to earn a 
decent wage, buy a decent home, put their kids through school, and do 
what they can to keep their families and communities strong.
  The priorities of my friends on the other side of the aisle lay with 
America's most successful: the hedge fund managers, Wall Street 
financiers, and the investment bankers. Our Republican colleagues are 
pushing a spending bill that is irresponsible and ignores the needs of 
a healing nation. It cuts jobs, threatens American innovation, and 
diminishes investments in rebuilding America. And to what extent? Well, 
I can tell you, as a former mayor, I have seen firsthand the 
consequences of what is being proposed. Some of the most egregious cuts 
come at the expense of our most vulnerable and some of the most 
immediate job creators and economic growth engines that I know of.
  Our colleagues are gutting more than $340 million from the Community 
Service Block Grants and nearly $3 billion from the Community 
Development Block Grant program. These are real dollars that are 
putting Americans back to work and helping small businesses in 
communities all across this Nation.
  In addition, this budget slashes $1.6 billion in job training and 
cuts $120 million in alternative youth training that prepares kids for 
work in construction and other trades, critical skills that are 
necessary to help us make things again here in America.
  Our colleagues, since assuming the majority last month, haven't 
offered one single piece of legislation that would create jobs. My 
friends on the other side of the aisle, at the same time that they are 
cutting billions of dollars in jobs programs that will help put 
Americans back to work, are continuing to support hundreds of billions

[[Page 1928]]

of dollars in tax breaks to companies that are shipping our jobs 
overseas. While they cut 200,000 children from receiving early 
childhood education through Head Start, they are giving $43 billion in 
subsidies to the oil and gas companies.
  This Republican proposal cuts Pell Grants for 9 million students, 
making it difficult and, for some, impossible to continue to go to 
college while at the same time continuing to give large agricultural 
corporations billions of dollars in Federal subsidies.
  This is a question of priorities, and it's clear what the priorities 
of my friends on the other side of the aisle are. The Republicans are 
moving forward with a dangerous spending bill, one that continues to 
give rewards to the rich and literally guts the initiatives most 
meaningful to middle class families.
  The work of reducing our deficit and controlling spending will be 
hard, to be sure. The fact of the matter is that we have to cut 
spending and we have to be serious about it, but we have to do it 
responsibly. We cannot cut what makes us competitive and what helps us 
to innovate, succeed in the global economy, and ultimately create jobs.
  I know that the priorities that we have set are the priorities of 
getting people back to work. My friends, we owe it to the hardworking 
people of our Nation who are struggling to get by, who are playing by 
the rules but just waiting for someone to stand up for them rather than 
stand up for the rich guy on Wall Street. We owe it to America's 
hardworking people to have a serious and thoughtful debate with the 
hopes of producing a smart and sensible budget for our country. And 
that's why it's critical we ask our Republican friends: Just what are 
your priorities? Do we have the courage to stand with our country's 
greatest assets, our hardworking people? Or do we stand with the people 
who have enjoyed the most at the expense of everyone else?
  America's future depends on harnessing the innovation, education, and 
entrepreneurship of our fellow Americans. This budget proposal 
undermines that opportunity, endangers our recovery, and makes our 
future less certain.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Flake).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. DICKS. Madam Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Arizona will 
be postponed.
  The Clerk will read.
  The Clerk read as follows:

                Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance, including training, organization, 
     and administration, of the Army Reserve; repair of facilities 
     and equipment; hire of passenger motor vehicles; travel and 
     transportation; care of the dead; recruiting; procurement of 
     services, supplies, and equipment; and communications, 
     $2,840,427,000.

                Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance, including training, organization, 
     and administration, of the Navy Reserve; repair of facilities 
     and equipment; hire of passenger motor vehicles; travel and 
     transportation; care of the dead; recruiting; procurement of 
     services, supplies, and equipment; and communications, 
     $1,344,264,000.

            Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance, including training, organization, 
     and administration, of the Marine Corps Reserve; repair of 
     facilities and equipment; hire of passenger motor vehicles; 
     travel and transportation; care of the dead; recruiting; 
     procurement of services, supplies, and equipment; and 
     communications, $275,484,000.

              Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve

       For expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance, including training, organization, 
     and administration, of the Air Force Reserve; repair of 
     facilities and equipment; hire of passenger motor vehicles; 
     travel and transportation; care of the dead; recruiting; 
     procurement of services, supplies, and equipment; and 
     communications, $3,291,027,000.

             Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard

       For expenses of training, organizing, and administering the 
     Army National Guard, including medical and hospital treatment 
     and related expenses in non-Federal hospitals; maintenance, 
     operation, and repairs to structures and facilities; hire of 
     passenger motor vehicles; personnel services in the National 
     Guard Bureau; travel expenses (other than mileage), as 
     authorized by law for Army personnel on active duty, for Army 
     National Guard division, regimental, and battalion commanders 
     while inspecting units in compliance with National Guard 
     Bureau regulations when specifically authorized by the Chief, 
     National Guard Bureau; supplying and equipping the Army 
     National Guard as authorized by law; and expenses of repair, 
     modification, maintenance, and issue of supplies and 
     equipment (including aircraft), $6,454,624,000.

             Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard

       For expenses of training, organizing, and administering the 
     Air National Guard, including medical and hospital treatment 
     and related expenses in non-Federal hospitals; maintenance, 
     operation, and repairs to structures and facilities; 
     transportation of things, hire of passenger motor vehicles; 
     supplying and equipping the Air National Guard, as authorized 
     by law; expenses for repair, modification, maintenance, and 
     issue of supplies and equipment, including those furnished 
     from stocks under the control of agencies of the Department 
     of Defense; travel expenses (other than mileage) on the same 
     basis as authorized by law for Air National Guard personnel 
     on active Federal duty, for Air National Guard commanders 
     while inspecting units in compliance with National Guard 
     Bureau regulations when specifically authorized by the Chief, 
     National Guard Bureau, $5,963,839,000.

          United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

       For salaries and expenses necessary for the United States 
     Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, $14,068,000, of which 
     not to exceed $5,000 may be used for official representation 
     purposes.

                    Environmental Restoration, Army

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For the Department of the Army, $464,581,000, to remain 
     available until transferred:  Provided, That the Secretary of 
     the Army shall, upon determining that such funds are required 
     for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of 
     hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris of 
     the Department of the Army, or for similar purposes, transfer 
     the funds made available by this appropriation to other 
     appropriations made available to the Department of the Army, 
     to be merged with and to be available for the same purposes 
     and for the same time period as the appropriations to which 
     transferred:  Provided further, That upon a determination 
     that all or part of the funds transferred from this 
     appropriation are not necessary for the purposes provided 
     herein, such amounts may be transferred back to this 
     appropriation:  Provided further, That the transfer authority 
     provided under this heading is in addition to any other 
     transfer authority provided elsewhere in this Act.

                    Environmental Restoration, Navy

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For the Department of the Navy, $304,867,000, to remain 
     available until transferred:  Provided, That the Secretary of 
     the Navy shall, upon determining that such funds are required 
     for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of 
     hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris of 
     the Department of the Navy, or for similar purposes, transfer 
     the funds made available by this appropriation to other 
     appropriations made available to the Department of the Navy, 
     to be merged with and to be available for the same purposes 
     and for the same time period as the appropriations to which 
     transferred:  Provided further, That upon a determination 
     that all or part of the funds transferred from this 
     appropriation are not necessary for the purposes provided 
     herein, such amounts may be transferred back to this 
     appropriation:  Provided further, That the transfer authority 
     provided under this heading is in addition to any other 
     transfer authority provided elsewhere in this Act.

                  Environmental Restoration, Air Force

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For the Department of the Air Force, $502,653,000, to 
     remain available until transferred:  Provided, That the 
     Secretary of the Air Force shall, upon determining that such 
     funds are required for environmental restoration, reduction 
     and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings 
     and debris of the Department of the Air Force, or for similar 
     purposes, transfer the funds made available by this 
     appropriation to other appropriations made available to the 
     Department of the Air Force, to be merged with and to be 
     available for the same purposes and for the same time period 
     as the appropriations to which transferred:  Provided 
     further, That upon a determination that all

[[Page 1929]]

     or part of the funds transferred from this appropriation are 
     not necessary for the purposes provided herein, such amounts 
     may be transferred back to this appropriation:  Provided 
     further, That the transfer authority provided under this 
     heading is in addition to any other transfer authority 
     provided elsewhere in this Act.

                Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For the Department of Defense, $10,744,000, to remain 
     available until transferred:  Provided, That the Secretary of 
     Defense shall, upon determining that such funds are required 
     for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of 
     hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris of 
     the Department of Defense, or for similar purposes, transfer 
     the funds made available by this appropriation to other 
     appropriations made available to the Department of Defense, 
     to be merged with and to be available for the same purposes 
     and for the same time period as the appropriations to which 
     transferred:  Provided further, That upon a determination 
     that all or part of the funds transferred from this 
     appropriation are not necessary for the purposes provided 
     herein, such amounts may be transferred back to this 
     appropriation:  Provided further, That the transfer authority 
     provided under this heading is in addition to any other 
     transfer authority provided elsewhere in this Act.

         Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For the Department of the Army, $316,546,000, to remain 
     available until transferred:  Provided, That the Secretary of 
     the Army shall, upon determining that such funds are required 
     for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of 
     hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris at 
     sites formerly used by the Department of Defense, transfer 
     the funds made available by this appropriation to other 
     appropriations made available to the Department of the Army, 
     to be merged with and to be available for the same purposes 
     and for the same time period as the appropriations to which 
     transferred:  Provided further, That upon a determination 
     that all or part of the funds transferred from this 
     appropriation are not necessary for the purposes provided 
     herein, such amounts may be transferred back to this 
     appropriation:  Provided further, That the transfer authority 
     provided under this heading is in addition to any other 
     transfer authority provided elsewhere in this Act.

             Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid

       For expenses relating to the Overseas Humanitarian, 
     Disaster, and Civic Aid programs of the Department of Defense 
     (consisting of the programs provided under sections 401, 402, 
     404, 407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code), 
     $108,032,000, to remain available until September 30, 2012.

                  Cooperative Threat Reduction Account

       For assistance to the republics of the former Soviet Union 
     and, with appropriate authorization by the Department of 
     Defense and Department of State, to countries outside of the 
     former Soviet Union, including assistance provided by 
     contract or by grants, for facilitating the elimination and 
     the safe and secure transportation and storage of nuclear, 
     chemical and other weapons; for establishing programs to 
     prevent the proliferation of weapons, weapons components, and 
     weapon-related technology and expertise; for programs 
     relating to the training and support of defense and military 
     personnel for demilitarization and protection of weapons, 
     weapons components and weapons technology and expertise, and 
     for defense and military contacts, $522,512,000, to remain 
     available until September 30, 2013:  Provided, That of the 
     amounts provided under this heading, not less than 
     $13,500,000 shall be available only to support the 
     dismantling and disposal of nuclear submarines, submarine 
     reactor components, and security enhancements for transport 
     and storage of nuclear warheads in the Russian Far East and 
     North.

      Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund

       For the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce 
     Development Fund, $217,561,000.

                              {time}  1740

  Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Madam Chairman, I move to strike the last 
word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Madam Chair, I will not use 5 minutes.
  The United States imports over 60 percent of all the oil we consume, 
most of which is used for vehicles. OPEC alone exports 2 billion 
barrels per year to the United States. At a cost of $90 per barrel, 
approximate current price, this represents a $180 billion tax that our 
oil dependence imposes on American consumers.
  Some OPEC countries that profit from our oil dependence are listed by 
the State Department as sponsors of terrorism, Madam Chairman. 
Fortunately, we're using Clean Air Act amendments to reduce our 
dependence on foreign oil. In April, automakers joined auto workers and 
President Obama to announce a landmark fuel efficiency standard that 
will improve auto efficiency 30 percent by 2016. These standards will 
save Americans $3,000 per vehicle for each car purchased in 2016 or 
later and reduce our oil dependence by 77 billion gallons over the life 
of the vehicles produced between 2012 and 2016. This efficiency 
improvement will keep $9.9 billion from being sent to OPEC countries.
  In section 1746 of this continuing resolution, the Republicans have 
proposed cutting off funding for implementation of the Clean Air Act, 
which is the law that has made these vehicle efficiency investments 
possible. Americans cannot afford, Madam Chairman, to send more money 
to Libya and Iran.
  I urge my colleagues to reject this attack on the Clean Air Act.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will continue to read.
  The Clerk read as follows:

                               TITLE III

                              PROCUREMENT

                       Aircraft Procurement, Army

       For construction, procurement, production, modification, 
     and modernization of aircraft, equipment, including ordnance, 
     ground handling equipment, spare parts, and accessories 
     therefor; specialized equipment and training devices; 
     expansion of public and private plants, including the land 
     necessary therefor, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; 
     and procurement and installation of equipment, appliances, 
     and machine tools in public and private plants; reserve plant 
     and Government and contractor-owned equipment layaway; and 
     other expenses necessary for the foregoing purposes, 
     $5,254,791,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

                       Missile Procurement, Army

       For construction, procurement, production, modification, 
     and modernization of missiles, equipment, including ordnance, 
     ground handling equipment, spare parts, and accessories 
     therefor; specialized equipment and training devices; 
     expansion of public and private plants, including the land 
     necessary therefor, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; 
     and procurement and installation of equipment, appliances, 
     and machine tools in public and private plants; reserve plant 
     and Government and contractor-owned equipment layaway; and 
     other expenses necessary for the foregoing purposes, 
     $1,570,108,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

        Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army

       For construction, procurement, production, and modification 
     of weapons and tracked combat vehicles, equipment, including 
     ordnance, spare parts, and accessories therefor; specialized 
     equipment and training devices; expansion of public and 
     private plants, including the land necessary therefor, for 
     the foregoing purposes, and such lands and interests therein, 
     may be acquired, and construction prosecuted thereon prior to 
     approval of title; and procurement and installation of 
     equipment, appliances, and machine tools in public and 
     private plants; reserve plant and Government and contractor-
     owned equipment layaway; and other expenses necessary for the 
     foregoing purposes, $1,461,086,000, to remain available for 
     obligation until September 30, 2013.

                    Procurement of Ammunition, Army

       For construction, procurement, production, and modification 
     of ammunition, and accessories therefor; specialized 
     equipment and training devices; expansion of public and 
     private plants, including ammunition facilities, authorized 
     by section 2854 of title 10, United States Code, and the land 
     necessary therefor, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; 
     and procurement and installation of equipment, appliances, 
     and machine tools in public and private plants; reserve plant 
     and Government and contractor-owned equipment layaway; and 
     other expenses necessary for the foregoing purposes, 
     $1,847,066,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

                        Other Procurement, Army

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For construction, procurement, production, and modification 
     of vehicles, including tactical, support, and non-tracked 
     combat vehicles; the purchase of passenger motor vehicles for 
     replacement only; communications and electronic equipment; 
     other support equipment; spare parts, ordnance, and 
     accessories therefor; specialized equipment and training 
     devices; expansion of public and private plants, including 
     the land necessary

[[Page 1930]]

     therefor, for the foregoing purposes, and such lands and 
     interests therein, may be acquired, and construction 
     prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; and 
     procurement and installation of equipment, appliances, and 
     machine tools in public and private plants; reserve plant and 
     Government and contractor-owned equipment layaway; and other 
     expenses necessary for the foregoing purposes, 
     $8,145,665,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013:  Provided, That of the funds made 
     available in this paragraph, $15,000,000 shall be made 
     available to procure equipment, not otherwise provided for, 
     and may be transferred to other procurement accounts 
     available to the Department of the Army, and that funds so 
     transferred shall be available for the same purposes and the 
     same time period as the account to which transferred.


                 Amendment No. 87 Offered by Mr. Pompeo

  Mr. POMPEO. Madam Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 22, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 22, line 20, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 27, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 27, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 31, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 31, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 32, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 32, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $15,000,000)''.
       Page 33, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $105,000,000)''.
       Page 33, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $105,000,000)''.
       Page 34, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $105,000,000)''.
       Page 34, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $124,200,000)''.
       Page 34, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $3,200,000)''.
       Page 34, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $3,200,000)''.
       Page 359, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(increased by $502,400,000)''.

  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Kansas is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. POMPEO. Madam Chairman, let me begin by thanking Chairman Rogers 
and Ranking Member Dicks for the hard work that they did on the Defense 
appropriations bill. It was yeoman's work in difficult and challenging 
fiscal times to present a defense budget that makes sense for America. 
And there is no one who's come to Congress as a Member of this new 
freshman class who believes more strongly in making sure we have a 
strong national defense. It's for that reason that I move to reduce 
spending in that budget by $502 million with the amendment that I am 
proposing. This $502 million is spread among various procurement and 
research and innovation programs, and it is money that was not 
requested by the Department of Defense. This $502 million could 
certainly go to some program that they had asked for, but it's in a 
place that used to be reserved for earmarks. There is no particular 
program to which this $502 million is attributed. It goes assertedly 
for innovation. But we all know that innovation occurs in the private 
sector. And that's what this new majority is about. It's wrong to add 
$500 million to our deficit for a series of programs with no particular 
purpose except for the needs of businesses that once survived on those 
very earmarks.
  And so, while I am very pleased with the fact that this piece of 
legislation has removed earmarks and has moved us towards a great deal 
more transparency, I would urge my fellow Members to vote for this 
amendment so that we can continue to get rid of the very vestiges of 
earmarks that voters asked us to get rid of.
  I yield back.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Madam Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. The amendment sounds good. But unlike the Flake 
amendment, which sounded good, and we'll learn more about it, that was 
a small amount of money. This is a half a billion dollars.
  A lot of people are of the opinion that government has the answer to 
everything. Government doesn't even have the questions to everything, 
let alone the answers.
  And how many people in this Chamber have any idea how much technology 
our warfighters are using today? Whether it's on the battlefield or 
whether it's in training, whatever it might be, how many people know 
how much was created by small business or large business?
  American industry produces good ideas most of the time. And much of 
what we see on the battlefield today and in the Armed Services came 
about because of innovations from small business and big business. Who 
knows?
  If somebody can tell me how much of those great systems that we 
create for our soldiers, how much of that came from innovation, how 
much of it came from the government, then I might change my mind.
  But we don't know today. You give the committee an opportunity, we'll 
find out. We'll find out how much this innovative, the SBIR, how much 
it provides compared to industry, large and small. But today we don't 
know the answer. And for a half a billion dollars, we need to know the 
answer.
  So I don't object to the gentleman offering the amendment, really. 
But I do object to the gentleman's amendment because we don't know what 
the effect of it would be. We'd like to find out, and we think we owe 
it to the Members of this House who are responsible for the national 
defense to find out for them.
  I yield back.
  Mr. DICKS. I move to strike the requisite number of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. DICKS. I rise in very strong opposition to this amendment. The 
amendment deletes $60 million from procurement and $502.4 million from 
research and development. The sum of this funding is for innovative 
research and procurement from small businesses and unsolicited 
proposals.
  And the gentleman from Florida and myself, and the gentleman from 
California, we've been here a long time. We have seen time after time 
when weapon systems like Predator and ScanEagle, I mean, there's all 
kinds of things that have happened because of small businesses. And 
when we made a decision to cut out earmarks for for-profit companies, 
one of the things that our committee did on a bipartisan basis, with 
unanimity on both sides, was to say let's put some more money into this 
competitive program, the Small Business Innovation and Research 
Program, which is at NIH, and at a number of agencies, I think DOE has 
one. This is a way to bring small businesses into the Defense 
Department on a competitive basis. And they do things that the 
Department needs to have done.
  So I rise with my chairman, Mr. Young, in strong opposition to this 
amendment. This was done to try to help the small business sector still 
make the contribution in the future for innovative new defense 
technologies. It's a good program and one that we should support.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. FLAKE. I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. FLAKE. I won't take the 5 minutes. I just want to rise in strong 
support of this amendment. The gentleman is right; this was not asked 
for by the Department of Defense. And if we could save a half billion 
dollars, money that will not affect the war or the warfighter--but we 
see these kind of programs all the time. And it's more a way to 
generate economic activity than actually respond to any need. It 
assumes that the private sector out there, and small businesses aren't 
innovating on their own unless we ask them to do it.

                              {time}  1750

  Unless we specifically direct them or provide money for them to do 
it, they won't do it at all. That's just a false assumption.
  So I commend the gentleman for bringing the amendment to the floor.
  I yield to the gentleman from Kansas.

[[Page 1931]]


  Mr. POMPEO. Madam Chair, I would just like to add that I came from 
that very sector, small business. Until 45 days ago, I was running one, 
and I understand how small business works.
  What we don't need is government taking our money and handing it back 
to folks. What we need is to be left alone. We need smaller government. 
That's my core problem with the legislation for SBIRs. Government 
doesn't do a very good job of picking out which of those small 
businesses will be successful and which piece of technology will prove 
to be the one that will be good for our warfighters.
  If it will shrink government, if it will reduce taxes, then those 
small businesses will be successful. They will provide those 
technologies, and they will take wonderful care of every one of our 
soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines.
  Mr. FLAKE. Reclaiming my time, I just want to say, in closing, the 
gentleman is exactly right. Any dollar that we provide in this program 
has to be taken from a small business or an individual through taxes. 
That is money that they can't use to innovate on their own. And to 
actually go out and to respond to an RFP or to respond to needs of the 
Defense Department or to contract with them, they can do that without 
us having the specific program for them. So I urge support for the 
amendment.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Madam Chair, I move to strike the last 
word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. I welcome this amendment.
  I am struck when I hear some of my colleagues on the more 
conservative side, although this is not uniformly them, some on the 
conservative side are offering this amendment. We have this interesting 
dichotomy about whether or not the Federal Government can ever create 
jobs. In general, the conservative view is the Federal Government never 
creates jobs. In the military area, somehow there's an exception.
  We are told here that there is a constructive relationship that can 
exist between small businesses and the military that we are told 
doesn't exist elsewhere; but the major reason for cutting this is we 
are, at this point, overextended militarily.
  Of course, there is unanimity here that we want Americans to be the 
strongest Nation in the world. We are of course the strongest Nation in 
the world, and no one is second. We are overcommitted in a number of 
areas.
  The military has become not the instrument of self-defense by the 
United States, but the instrument to protecting political influence, 
and protecting influence militarily is often inefficient so that 
reducing this spending, as reducing other forms of military spending, 
is essential if we are to begin to hold down the deficit.
  Now, I am going to be talking tomorrow, and we're only talking in 
military terms of half a billion dollars. In terms of the defense 
budget, that appears to be relatively small, but it is more than enough 
than would be needed to fund the Security and Exchange Commission and 
the Commodities Futures Trading Commission at the full level they need 
to regulate derivatives and hedge funds.
  We have a massive disproportion in which we overspend militarily far 
beyond what is needed to protect ourselves. Our military budget is the 
largest foreign aid program in the history of the world. It exists to 
provide subsidies to our wealthier allies who face no threat. And to 
the extent that we can reduce that, particularly in an area where the 
Defense Department itself did not even ask for the funds, we curb 
unnecessary spending.
  As I said, tomorrow I will be offering an amendment to try to give 
the Securities and Exchange Commission the ability to regulate hedge 
funds, or at least to keep track of them. We will be trying to offer 
funding to protect consumers from credit card abuse and trying to 
provide funding to regulate derivatives.
  Taken together, those three agencies are being cut by an amount 
smaller than one-half billion, and we will be told that we can't afford 
that. So I welcome the gentleman pointing out the inconsistency between 
those who say that the private sector should be left to its own and the 
public sector does not become the job creator here in this way, and I 
welcome also the chance to begin, as I will be supporting the amendment 
of the gentleman of Arizona, this massive disproportion in which we 
overspend militarily. And I say ``overspend,'' because it is far beyond 
what is needed for the legitimate defense of the United States. It has 
become a form of staking our political interests, and it comes at very 
great cost to virtually everything else we want to do, as well as 
constraining the deficit reduction.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. MORAN. Madam Chair, I move to strike the requisite number of 
words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Virginia is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. MORAN. I rise in opposition to this amendment, in support of what 
the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee has said as well as 
Chairman Young both of whom have substantial years of experience behind 
them.
  Now, what Mr. Frank has suggested has merit, but to support this 
amendment is a non sequitur to that argument. As for the gentleman from 
Arizona, at least he is consistent. As for the gentleman offering the 
amendment, well, let me try to explain why it is counterproductive. It 
defines the phrase ``penny wise and pound foolish.''
  In fact, where we have made our greatest strides within the defense 
budget is in small business innovation. There are half a dozen very 
large defense contractors. They serve our country well. They take good 
ideas, they hire people, they develop them, they achieve major 
procurement contracts with the Defense Department. But, for the most 
part, they don't come up with the innovations. It's the small 
businesses throughout the country, that more often than not, come up 
with those innovations.
  For example, the predator drone that has been the most successful 
weapon in Afghanistan was an earmark for small businesses with an 
innovative idea. An idea, incidentally, that was initially opposed by 
the Defense Dept. Much of our IED success in saving lives has come from 
small businesses.
  Much of the simulation training that we provide our troops so they 
don't have to put their lives at risk, but rather can achieve the kind 
of training that gives them the skill set to represent us with such 
courage and effectiveness on the battlefield, that comes from small 
business innovation.
  And what we are trying to do now is to put a relatively small sum of 
money together so that thousands of small businesses throughout the 
country can compete for those small grants.
  Now, the fact is, as much as I respect the defense contractors, it is 
not necessarily in their interests to innovate, to come up with cost-
cutting efficiencies, because it means that you have to reduce 
personnel and contract costs. Oftentimes, it exposes the fact that 
we're paying more than we need to for innovative approaches to securing 
our country. It is the small businesses of this country that really 
provide the ability for us to find the highest level of efficiency and 
effectiveness within our Defense Department.
  For half a billion dollars, we will find more ways to save thousands 
of lives and we know we will save tens of billions of dollars in the 
long run. That's what this program is all about. It's a departure from 
the way we have done things. It's all about saving money, not relying 
upon Big Business or Big Government, but letting small businesses 
flourish who otherwise couldn't get the capital, wouldn't have the 
investors, couldn't pull the personnel together and pay them long 
enough to be able to adequately develop the potential of a great idea.
  So this small pool of innovative research money will fund great 
ideas, ideas that make our troops safer, that enable us to let our 
dollars go further, and in fact enable our Nation to be far more 
secure. This is just the kind of program we ought to be funding more

[[Page 1932]]

of in the Defense Department. That's why I would strongly urge defeat 
of this amendment.

                              {time}  1800

  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Pompeo).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. DICKS. Madam Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kansas will 
be postponed.
  The Clerk will read.
  The Clerk read as follows:

                       Aircraft Procurement, Navy

       For construction, procurement, production, modification, 
     and modernization of aircraft, equipment, including ordnance, 
     spare parts, and accessories therefor; specialized equipment; 
     expansion of public and private plants, including the land 
     necessary therefor, and such lands and interests therein, may 
     be acquired, and construction prosecuted thereon prior to 
     approval of title; and procurement and installation of 
     equipment, appliances, and machine tools in public and 
     private plants; reserve plant and Government and contractor-
     owned equipment layaway, $16,170,868,000, to remain available 
     for obligation until September 30, 2013.

  Mr. GUTIERREZ. I move to strike the requisite number of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Madam Chair, I rise today to introduce my amendment to 
cut funding for the V-22, a hybrid helicopter/airplane that was in 
development for more than 25 years, cost the lives of 30 individuals 
before it ever saw combat, and still does not meet operational 
requirements in Iraq. Cost overruns have plagued the V-22 since its 
development. Initial estimates projected $40 million per plane. But 
today it has exploded to $120 million per plane--a threefold increase. 
This amendment would save $415 million for the remainder of fiscal year 
2011 by cutting funding for the V-22 from the Air Force and Navy's 
aircraft procurement accounts.
  In 2009, the GAO found that the Marine Corps received 105 V-22s. Of 
those, fewer than half--only 47--were considered combat deployable. But 
on any given day, there are an estimated 22--fewer than one in four--
ready for any combat. This is largely due to unreliable parts and 
maintenance challenges. It was reported that 13 of the V-22's parts 
lasted only 30 percent of their life expectancy and six lasted less 
than 10 percent. In addition, the GAO found that the V-22 did not have 
weather radar and its ice protection system was unreliable. Not me. 
GAO. So that flying through icy conditions is prohibited on this plane. 
Can't do it. Icy conditions are often found in Afghanistan. Oddly 
enough, the V-22 also had problems in dusty conditions, which, 
coincidentally, also exist and is common in Afghanistan.
  So I ask my colleagues, why do we continue to fund this boondoggle? 
The majority claims to have made some tough choices in this bill. 
Apparently this includes continuing to fund a plane that Dick Cheney 
called, a, quote, turkey and tried to kill four times when he was 
Secretary of Defense. It should also be noted that Dick Cheney did not 
often meet a defense program he didn't like, so this should be very 
telling to everyone here. In order to continue funding this plane, this 
Congress proposes steep cuts to be made on the backs of the most 
vulnerable citizens.
  H.R. 1 puts the safety of American families at risk. The bill 
eliminates COPS hiring, a program that will put 1,330 fewer cops on our 
streets. The bill cuts the SAFER program, which means there are 2,400 
fewer firefighters protecting our communities; so that we can build a 
plane that can't fly under icy conditions, can't fly when there's sand, 
and only one out of four is ever used at any given time?
  The majority has made the shortsighted choice to cut $1.3 billion 
from community health centers which, according to the CEO of the 
National Association of Community Health Centers, is equivalent to 
terminating health care to the entire population of Chicago, or to 
everyone living in the States of Wyoming, Vermont, North and South 
Dakota and Alaska combined. Why? For a plane that cannot fly when it's 
icy, which cannot fly when it's dusty. And where are we at? In a combat 
situation where we need it to do both things.
  Look. If this weren't enough, the bill also eliminates title X 
funding which provides services for cancer screenings, annual exams, 
STD testing and contraceptives.
  H.R. 1 would also cut $5 billion from Federal Pell Grants. In 
Illinois, this will reduce financial aid to 61,000 poor students. And 
as I had suggested earlier here today, maybe as Members of Congress, 
maybe because we are in the top 1 percent of wage earners in the United 
States of America, people of America understand we make $175,000, each 
and every one of us, and there are over 150 millionaires in this body, 
maybe we don't care. Maybe you can cut the Pell Grant program because 
you don't care whether kids get ahead and are able to go to college. 
But some of us should, especially those of us that have been blessed 
with the riches of wealth in this Nation and allowed to be able to 
serve in this body.
  And so I simply say, Let the kids go to school. Let there be health 
care for the most vulnerable of Americans. And all we will be missing 
is this boondoggle of a hybrid helicopter that does not serve the 
purpose for which it was proposed.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. MEEHAN. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word and to speak 
in opposition to the amendment that was just proposed by the gentleman 
from Illinois.


                         Parliamentary Inquiry

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman.
  The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Thornberry). The gentleman will state his 
inquiry.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Do we have an amendment before the House at the 
present time?
  The Acting CHAIR. We do not.
  Mr. MEEHAN. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Pennsylvania is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. MEEHAN. I appreciate the opportunity to speak on behalf of this 
very, very significant and important piece of military hardware, the V-
22 Osprey. Notwithstanding the discussion in which the GAO has made a 
report, the fact of the matter is this is an instrument which has 
proven itself in the theater of war. Those who have been the most 
significant advocates for this very, very important airplane have been 
those who have used it in the theater of war, the United States Marine 
Corps. This has been used successfully in 14 different deployments, 
most recently in Iraq and Afghanistan, and has proven itself time and 
time again; proven itself to have the flexibility to be able to 
accommodate the new challenge that the Marines are facing in these 
dramatically challenging circumstances; the functionality to be able to 
respond quickly to moving troops, not just to insert most effectively 
in a time fashion but to be also able to get there as quickly as 
possible, in real-world combat situations that are changing as we 
speak.
  Day and night raids. This is the instrument that the Air Force, 
Special Forces, and the Marines have identified as among the most 
important; the instrument that rushes to the front and medevacs the 
soldiers. I just visited Walter Reed just about a month ago, and the 
ability to get soldiers who are injured from the front lines back to 
the United States in time is remarkable. This is one of those 
instruments that allows them to do it. It's a technology which has been 
proven, not just in the battlefield but has also been proven by its 
performance. They have worked out the kinks. They have paid for it. 
This is the thing that the Marine Corps is asking for that's 
consistently within the boundaries of the existing defense budget. The 
soldiers on the front line are asking for the V-22 Osprey because it 
helps them do their job. We must stand in support of the soldiers who 
are

[[Page 1933]]

doing the work defending our Nation most effectively. They are the ones 
who are proving that it works.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.


               Amendment No. 63 Offered by Mr. Gutierrez

  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 23, line 12, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $21,985,000)''.
       Page 28, line 20, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $393,098,000)''.
       Page 359, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(increased by $415,083,000)''.

  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. GUTIERREZ. I have already used my 5 minutes prior, so I yield 
back the balance of my time.
  Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado. I move to strike the requisite number of 
words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.

                              {time}  1810

  Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
Gutierrez amendment.
  The amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois would do an 
across-the-board general reduction to the aircraft procurement accounts 
for the Navy and the Air Force. The total reduction at $405.1 million 
would be transferred to the spending reduction account.
  Let me just say, he spoke to the V-22 aircraft that the United States 
Marine Corps uses today in Iraq and Afghanistan. Let me tell you, as a 
former infantry officer in the United States Marine Corps, I can't 
speak highly enough of the V-22 aircraft.
  There is no replacement right now if that aircraft were suspended in 
service. The CH-46 aircraft was put in the fleet in 1964 and retired in 
2004, and the CH-53, I believe, in 1966. These old air frames are 
retiring. They need to be replaced. The V-22 is an effective aircraft, 
serving our Marines in the field in places like Afghanistan and Iraq 
with the kind of effort that our troops deserve.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of 
words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. DICKS. The amendment would remove $415 million total from Navy 
and Air Force procurement accounts. This funding would reduce the 
number of V-22 Ospreys from the DOD portion of the bill. The Osprey has 
proven itself under combat conditions to be safe, effective, 
survivable, and maintainable and is meeting all operational taskings. I 
have actually flown on the Osprey and I feel it is a very safe 
airplane. Today, flight-hours are increasing rapidly and will exceed 
100,000 flight-hours in the first quarter of calendar year 2011. Forty-
six percent of these hours have been flown in the last 2 years.
  The first combat deployment was September 2007. From that time to the 
present, the V-22 has been in the following deployments: three 
deployments in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, three deployments in 
support of Operation Enduring Freedom, and three Marine Expeditionary 
Unit deployments.
  The Marine Corps has procured nearly two-thirds of the required fleet 
of aircraft, 250 out of a total of 360. The program is currently in the 
4th year of a 5-year multiyear procurement, and we only give multiyear 
procurements on programs that we think are highly stable.
  This is a proven aircraft, and I urge rejection of this amendment.
  This is an important program, one that the Special Forces are going 
to use, and I think we have to be very careful. For the Marine Corps, 
this is one of their essential programs that they have strongly 
supported for many, many years, and it would be a devastating blow to 
them not to finish this procurement.
  I yield back my time.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite 
number of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment.
  Some of our Members have made some very eloquent statements why this 
is not a good amendment, so I am going to be very brief and just say 
very simply, this amendment could possibly have a serious adverse 
effect on the soldiers and the Marines who are operating in and around 
the mountains of Afghanistan who need what the V-22 can provide them. 
If it is not available, if it is not there, they could be in serious 
trouble.
  So this is not a good amendment, and I don't think we should support 
it in any way.
  I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise to support the amendment introduced 
by my colleague from Illinois (Mr. Gutierrez). If we are truly serious 
about reducing our long-term deficits, we must look at the whole 
picture, a picture that includes defense. There can be no sacred cows 
or pork.
  Today, defense spending, including security-related programs, 
comprises almost 20 percent of Federal spending, yet it is the only 
part of this budget that is exempt from the tough cuts facing all other 
Departments.
  The Osprey is one of the most egregious examples of waste in the 
defense budget, yet DOD continues to request this costly, ineffective 
machine. And with due respect, the only threat this amendment poses if 
it doesn't pass, it could kill our own troops. Even worse, Congress 
continues to fund it.
  The Osprey was originally created to allow Marines to carry troops 
and cargo faster, higher and farther than a traditional helicopter. Now 
the Osprey is 186 percent over budget, costs $100 million per unit to 
produce, it is not suited to fly safely in extreme heat, excessive sand 
or under fire, and, sadly, this aircraft has killed 30 Marines in 
accidents.
  The Government Accountability Office recommended DOD reconsider 
procurement of the Osprey, and experts argue a helicopter could achieve 
many of the objectives of the Osprey at a much lower cost. Let's show 
our constituents we are serious about cutting the deficit by looking at 
all parts of the budget. Waste is waste; bloat is bloat. The fact that 
it comes under the Department of Defense doesn't change anything.
  I urge adoption of this amendment because eliminating funding for 
procurement of a costly, inefficient and over-budget V-22 Osprey will 
prove to our constituents that we are serious about reducing spending. 
It will help realign our military strategy to meet today's needs, and 
it will save the taxpayers $415 million this year alone.
  I yield back.
  Mr. MORAN. Mr. Chair, I move to strike the requisite number of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Virginia is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. MORAN. Mr. Chairman, I can understand why our colleagues from 
Illinois have offered this amendment. Assertions recently surfaced 
about the inability of the Osprey to operate in hot conditions, high 
altitudes or from U.S. Navy ships. But the fact is that these charges 
have been disproven repeatedly in daily operations. The fact is that 
the Osprey provides unparalleled flexibility for Marines and Air Force 
Special Forces in combat operations.
  We have had 14 fully successful deployments to date. No aircraft in 
the U.S. inventory has been subjected to as extensive a series of live-
fire testing as the V-22. It is the most survivable rotorcraft ever 
built for the Marine Corps and Air Force. When the enemy has been able 
to hit the V-22, the aircraft has absorbed the damage and returned to 
base without injuries to passengers or crew on every single occasion.
  Many of the initial readiness challenges stem from deploying the 
aircraft into combat before a supply chain

[[Page 1934]]

and depot maintenance infrastructure was adequately in place. The 
reason it cost more was that the Special Forces felt they needed to 
bring it into combat operation immediately because it was such a 
successful rotorcraft. They needed it for the safety and effectiveness 
of our troops.
  The fact is that major studies from both government and industry have 
shown that the V-22 is more operationally effective and cost efficient 
than any helicopter alternative. It requires fewer aircraft, fewer 
personnel and support than conventional rotorcraft. That results in a 
reduced footprint and, what we all need to be concerned about, 
particularly in this context, a lower total life-cycle costs.
  For that reason, I think that we ought to reject this amendment and 
enable the Defense Department to choose its own priorities for cost 
cutting, and certainly Secretary Gates is in the process of doing that.
  I yield back.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Gutierrez).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois 
will be postponed.
  The Clerk will read.
  The Clerk read as follows:

                       Weapons Procurement, Navy

       For construction, procurement, production, modification, 
     and modernization of missiles, torpedoes, other weapons, and 
     related support equipment including spare parts, and 
     accessories therefor; expansion of public and private plants, 
     including the land necessary therefor, and such lands and 
     interests therein, may be acquired, and construction 
     prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; and 
     procurement and installation of equipment, appliances, and 
     machine tools in public and private plants; reserve plant and 
     Government and contractor-owned equipment layaway, 
     $3,221,957,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

            Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps

       For construction, procurement, production, and modification 
     of ammunition, and accessories therefor; specialized 
     equipment and training devices; expansion of public and 
     private plants, including ammunition facilities, authorized 
     by section 2854 of title 10, United States Code, and the land 
     necessary therefor, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; 
     and procurement and installation of equipment, appliances, 
     and machine tools in public and private plants; reserve plant 
     and Government and contractor-owned equipment layaway; and 
     other expenses necessary for the foregoing purposes, 
     $790,527,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

                   Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy

       For expenses necessary for the construction, acquisition, 
     or conversion of vessels as authorized by law, including 
     armor and armament thereof, plant equipment, appliances, and 
     machine tools and installation thereof in public and private 
     plants; reserve plant and Government and contractor-owned 
     equipment layaway; procurement of critical, long lead time 
     components and designs for vessels to be constructed or 
     converted in the future; and expansion of public and private 
     plants, including land necessary therefor, and such lands and 
     interests therein, may be acquired, and construction 
     prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title, as follows:
       Carrier Replacement Program, $1,721,969,000;
       Carrier Replacement Program (AP), $908,313,000;
       NSSN, $3,430,343,000;
       NSSN (AP), $1,691,236,000;
       CVN Refueling, $1,248,999,000;
       CVN Refuelings (AP), $408,037,000;
       DDG-1000 Program, $77,512,000;
       DDG-51 Destroyer, $2,868,454,000;
       DDG-51 Destroyer (AP), $47,984,000;
       Littoral Combat Ship, $1,168,984,000;
       Littoral Combat Ship (AP), $190,351,000;
       LHA-R, $942,837,000;
       Joint High Speed Vessel, $180,703,000;
       Oceanographic Ships, $88,561,000;
       LCAC Service Life Extension Program, $83,035,000;
       Service Craft, $13,770,000; and
       For outfitting, post delivery, conversions, and first 
     destination transportation, $295,570,000.
       In all: $15,366,658,000, to remain available for obligation 
     until September 30, 2015:  Provided, That additional 
     obligations may be incurred after September 30, 2015, for 
     engineering services, tests, evaluations, and other such 
     budgeted work that must be performed in the final stage of 
     ship construction:  Provided further, That none of the funds 
     provided under this heading for the construction or 
     conversion of any naval vessel to be constructed in shipyards 
     in the United States shall be expended in foreign facilities 
     for the construction of major components of such vessel:  
     Provided further, That none of the funds provided under this 
     heading shall be used for the construction of any naval 
     vessel in foreign shipyards.

                        Other Procurement, Navy

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For procurement, production, and modernization of support 
     equipment and materials not otherwise provided for, Navy 
     ordnance (except ordnance for new aircraft, new ships, and 
     ships authorized for conversion); the purchase of passenger 
     motor vehicles for replacement only, and the purchase of 
     seven vehicles required for physical security of personnel, 
     notwithstanding price limitations applicable to passenger 
     vehicles but not to exceed $250,000 per vehicle; expansion of 
     public and private plants, including the land necessary 
     therefor, and such lands and interests therein, may be 
     acquired, and construction prosecuted thereon prior to 
     approval of title; and procurement and installation of 
     equipment, appliances, and machine tools in public and 
     private plants; reserve plant and Government and contractor-
     owned equipment layaway, $5,804,963,000, to remain available 
     for obligation until September 30, 2013:  Provided,  That of 
     the funds made available in this paragraph, $15,000,000 shall 
     be made available to procure equipment, not otherwise 
     provided for, and may be transferred to other procurement 
     accounts available to the Department of the Navy, and that 
     funds so transferred shall be available for the same purposes 
     and the same time period as the account to which transferred.

                       Procurement, Marine Corps

       For expenses necessary for the procurement, manufacture, 
     and modification of missiles, armament, military equipment, 
     spare parts, and accessories therefor; plant equipment, 
     appliances, and machine tools, and installation thereof in 
     public and private plants; reserve plant and Government and 
     contractor-owned equipment layaway; vehicles for the Marine 
     Corps, including the purchase of passenger motor vehicles for 
     replacement only; and expansion of public and private plants, 
     including land necessary therefor, and such lands and 
     interests therein, may be acquired, and construction 
     prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title, 
     $1,236,436,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

                    Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

       For construction, procurement, and modification of aircraft 
     and equipment, including armor and armament, specialized 
     ground handling equipment, and training devices, spare parts, 
     and accessories therefor; specialized equipment; expansion of 
     public and private plants, Government-owned equipment and 
     installation thereof in such plants, erection of structures, 
     and acquisition of land, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; 
     reserve plant and Government and contractor-owned equipment 
     layaway; and other expenses necessary for the foregoing 
     purposes including rents and transportation of things, 
     $13,483,739,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013:  Provided, That none of the funds 
     provided in this Act for modification of C-17 aircraft, 
     Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and F-22 aircraft may be 
     obligated until all C-17, Global Hawk and F-22 contracts 
     funded with prior year ``Aircraft Procurement, Air Force'' 
     appropriated funds are definitized unless the Secretary of 
     the Air Force certifies in writing to the congressional 
     defense committees that each such obligation is necessary to 
     meet the needs of a warfighting requirement or prevents 
     increased costs to the taxpayer, and provides the reasons for 
     failing to definitize the prior year contracts along with the 
     prospective contract definitization schedule:  Provided 
     further, That the Secretary of the Air Force shall expand the 
     current HH-60 Operational Loss Replacement program to meet 
     the approved HH-60 Recapitalization program requirements.

                     Missile Procurement, Air Force

       For construction, procurement, and modification of 
     missiles, spacecraft, rockets, and related equipment, 
     including spare parts and accessories therefor, ground 
     handling equipment, and training devices; expansion of public 
     and private plants, Government-owned equipment and 
     installation thereof in such plants, erection of structures, 
     and acquisition of land, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon prior to approval of title; 
     reserve plant and Government and contractor-owned equipment 
     layaway; and other expenses necessary for the foregoing 
     purposes including rents and transportation of things, 
     $5,424,764,000, to remain available for obligation until 
     September 30, 2013.

                  Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force

       For construction, procurement, production, and modification 
     of ammunition, and accessories therefor; specialized 
     equipment and training devices; expansion of public and 
     private plants, including ammunition facilities, authorized 
     by section 2854 of title 10,

[[Page 1935]]

     United States Code, and the land necessary therefor, for the 
     foregoing purposes, and such lands and interests therein, may 
     be acquired, and construction prosecuted thereon prior to 
     approval of title; and procurement and installation of 
     equipment, appliances, and machine tools in public and 
     private plants; reserve plant and Government and contractor-
     owned equipment layaway; and other expenses necessary for the 
     foregoing purposes, $731,487,000, to remain available for 
     obligation until September 30, 2013.

                      Other Procurement, Air Force

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For procurement and modification of equipment (including 
     ground guidance and electronic control equipment, and ground 
     electronic and communication equipment), and supplies, 
     materials, and spare parts therefor, not otherwise provided 
     for; the purchase of passenger motor vehicles for replacement 
     only, and the purchase of two vehicles required for physical 
     security of personnel, notwithstanding price limitations 
     applicable to passenger vehicles but not to exceed $250,000 
     per vehicle; lease of passenger motor vehicles; and expansion 
     of public and private plants, Government-owned equipment and 
     installation thereof in such plants, erection of structures, 
     and acquisition of land, for the foregoing purposes, and such 
     lands and interests therein, may be acquired, and 
     construction prosecuted thereon, prior to approval of title; 
     reserve plant and Government and contractor-owned equipment 
     layaway, $17,568,091,000, to remain available for obligation 
     until September 30, 2013:  Provided, That of the funds made 
     available in this paragraph, $15,000,000 shall be made 
     available to procure equipment, not otherwise provided for, 
     and may be transferred to other procurement accounts 
     available to the Department of the Air Force, and that funds 
     so transferred shall be available for the same purposes and 
     the same time period as the account to which transferred.

                       Procurement, Defense-Wide

                     (including transfer of funds)

       For expenses of activities and agencies of the Department 
     of Defense (other than the military departments) necessary 
     for procurement, production, and modification of equipment, 
     supplies, materials, and spare parts therefor, not otherwise 
     provided for; the purchase of passenger motor vehicles for 
     replacement only; expansion of public and private plants, 
     equipment, and installation thereof in such plants, erection 
     of structures, and acquisition of land for the foregoing 
     purposes, and such lands and interests therein, may be 
     acquired, and construction prosecuted thereon prior to 
     approval of title; reserve plant and Government and 
     contractor-owned equipment layaway, $4,009,321,000, to remain 
     available for obligation until September 30, 2013:  Provided, 
     That of the funds made available in this paragraph, 
     $15,000,000 shall be made available to procure equipment, not 
     otherwise provided for, and may be transferred to other 
     procurement accounts available to the Department of Defense, 
     and that funds so transferred shall be available for the same 
     purposes and the same time period as the account to which 
     transferred.

                    Defense Production Act Purchases

       For activities by the Department of Defense pursuant to 
     sections 108, 301, 302, and 303 of the Defense Production Act 
     of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2078, 2091, 2092, and 2093), 
     $34,346,000, to remain available until expended.

                              {time}  1820


                 Amendment No. 86 Offered by Mr. Pompeo

  Mr. POMPEO. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
  The text of the amendment is as follows:

       Page 32, line 21, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $3,200,000)''.
       Page 33, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $36,320,000)''.
       Page 33, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $40,000,000)''.
       Page 33, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(reduced by $4,000,000)''.
       Page 34, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced 
     by $32,000,000)''.
       Page 359, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert 
     ``(increased by $115,520,000)''.

  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Kansas is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. POMPEO. Mr. Chairman, I rise to amend the Defense appropriations 
bill by cutting $115 million of additional funding. This $115 million 
is aimed at alternative energy inside the Defense Department 
appropriations budget. I will assure you that with the President having 
advocated in his budget for billions of dollars of alternative energy 
research, development, and other types of research, that we don't need 
$115 million of that in our Department of Defense budget.
  This funding is wasteful, it's duplicative, and won't help our 
soldiers. It's in five different parts of the appropriations 
legislation in small amounts, and this is new money. It's above and 
beyond that which the President had requested.
  We are not underfunding alternative energy research. Just this week, 
the Rand Corporation came out with a study talking about alternative 
energy research in the defense budget and they concluded it was not 
helping our soldiers, our sailors, our airmen, and our fighters.
  So I would urge support of this amendment reducing by $115 million 
the deficit that our Nation faces.
  Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite 
number of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New Jersey is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the 
amendment. The Defense Subcommittee has spent much time over the past 2 
years looking into the effects of the services--all the services--to 
reduce their dependence on fossil fuel. The Department of Defense, 
which consumes 93 percent of all the fuel consumed by the U.S. 
Government, has made significant strides in reducing its consumption, 
but the associated logistics of moving fuel for vehicles, aircraft, 
forward operating bases remain massive and costly. It has also been 
shown that for every 24 fuel convoys in Afghanistan, an American 
soldier is wounded or killed.
  The Defense Subcommittee has made a conscious and dedicated effort to 
advance the Department's efforts, searching for better ways to reduce 
consumption and alleviate the costly and complicated logistics. This 
amendment, however, would unnecessarily erase that progress and further 
the Department's dependence on fossil fuels. For this, and many other 
reasons, I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment.
  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to the 
amendment.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. DICKS. The amendment cuts $115.5 million in funding for 
development of alternative energy. The bill includes funding based in 
part on the Defense Science Board's February 2008 report on DOD energy 
strategy. The DSB report made numerous recommendations to improve DOD 
energy efficiency. In addition, the committee held a formal briefing 
with officials from the Military Services, the Defense Logistic Agency, 
and OSD to review energy efficiency and energy technology programs.
  DOD is the largest single consumer of energy in the United States. In 
2006, it spent $13.6 billion to buy 110 million barrels of petroleum 
fuel--about 300,000 barrels of oil each day--and 3.8 billion kilowatt 
hours of electricity. This represents about eight-tenths of 1 percent 
of total U.S. energy consumption and 78 percent of energy consumption 
by the Federal Government.
  In combat operations such as Iraq and Afghanistan, moving fuel to 
deployed forces has proven to be a high-risk operation. Reducing 
operational fuel demand is the single best means to reduce that risk. 
However, the Defense Science Board concluded that DOD is not currently 
equipped to make decision on the most effective way to do so.
  The DSB recommended increased investment in energy efficient and 
alternative energy technologies to a level commensurate with their 
operational and financial value. The Defense Science Board recommended 
that the Department of Defense invest in basic research to develop new 
fuel technologies that are too risky for private investments and to 
partner with private sector fuel users to leverage efforts and share 
burdens. The bill emphasizes funding these types of initiatives.
  I strongly urge rejection of this amendment.
  Mr. LYNCH. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. LYNCH. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
  I don't come here to argue that we don't have to make serious cuts 
and reduce our spending. I'm sure that we do--and we will. But I do 
find it remarkable that I stood in this place a

[[Page 1936]]

matter of weeks ago and fought to have a small increase in taxes for 
millionaires that would have eased the burden that we face today, but 
the argument was made--and made loudly from my colleagues across the 
aisle--that we couldn't afford to make millionaires pay more taxes. We 
were talking about increasing the tax rate on amounts over $250,000 
from 36 percent to 39 percent, and we were told that we could not do 
that.
  Yet here we are today and we're talking about cutting low-income 
heating assistance for families in the Northeast in New England that 
are suffering from the worst winter in decades. We're talking about 
cutting WIC for single moms who are trying to raise kids. We're talking 
about cutting education and funds for kids.
  It seems that our priorities are misplaced here. Save the tax cuts 
for the millionaires but cut everything for people who have nowhere 
else to turn. It's reverse Robin Hood. We're robbing from the poor to 
make sure the rich keep their tax cuts. I can't believe it. In that 
bill not many weeks ago--just a few weeks ago, we actually--I didn't, 
but those who voted for it did--cut $119 billion out of Social 
Security, but we kept those tax cuts for those millionaires.
  With all due respect to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle 
from the tea party, I actually represent the city of Boston, the port 
of Boston. When you visit the Tea Party Memorial, that's in my 
district. Just for the record, I want to make sure people understand 
when the colonists at the tea party revolted, they threw the tea 
overboard. They didn't throw senior citizens overboard. They didn't 
throw kids overboard. They didn't throw young mothers on WIC overboard. 
We have a challenge before us about where our priorities are going to 
be going forward.
  I'm proud to say that I grew up in the housing projects in south 
Boston. I'm not ashamed to say that we struggled as a family when I was 
a kid. I'm too old to be a WIC baby; but if they had had it, I'm sure 
my family would have been on it. As my dad used to say, there were 
times in our family where we had to save up to be poor.

                              {time}  1830

  But we have a moral obligation here to get our priorities right. I 
hope that at some point in this process that ideology is set aside and 
that we really do tackle in a fair way the problems that this country 
faces. I've been here long enough to understand that fairness does not 
always carry the day in these debates.
  Then you see the cuts to people who have nowhere else to turn. You 
see cuts to Social Security. There was $119 billion cut out of Social 
Security several weeks ago, and we diverted that out. I'm sure at some 
point we're going to hear that it's unsustainable, that Social Security 
is unsustainable, because we cut $119 billion out of it; but we've got 
seniors in this country who have nowhere else to turn. They're on fixed 
incomes.
  We cut Social Security rather than ask millionaires to give a little 
bit more. I think that is not consistent with what this country is all 
about. I hope at some point that common sense and mutual interests on 
behalf of what's really important in this country do prevail in this 
Chamber, that ideology, both far right and far left, is tossed aside, 
and that we can actually get down to the business of moving this 
country forward.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number 
of words.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Oregon is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. I rise in opposition to the amendment. I strongly 
support the comments from the gentlemen from New Jersey and the State 
of Washington. In fact, they understated the case.
  Mr. Chairman, the United States Department of Defense is the largest 
consumer of energy in the world. These, I think, ill-advised efforts to 
undercut important research areas have significant implications, first 
and foremost, for the operational activities of the Department of 
Defense. The Iraq war was four times more energy intense than the first 
gulf war given what has happened in terms of changing tactics; and, 
frankly, the danger to our troops was understated. Those tankers might 
as well have great big bull's-eyes painted on them because they were 
targets for terrorists, and they put our soldiers at risk; and all of 
us represent States that lost people because of that vulnerability. It 
costs over $100 a gallon to deliver this fuel to the front.
  I seriously hope that people take a deep breath and listen to the 
counsel of the people from the committee. This is a long-term threat to 
our men and women in the field. It is also a long-term threat to the 
budget of the Department of Defense. If you plot what their energy 
costs have been over time, it probably rivals only the cost of health 
care for our troops.
  I would hope that we understand the opportunities here. As my friend 
from the State of Washington pointed out, it is research that isn't 
going to happen from the private sector. This is the sort of investment 
that government needs to make up front. It's the same thing that led to 
the development of the Internet.
  It will have important economic benefits going forward because this 
will not be exclusively the province of the Department of Defense. The 
extent to which these technologies work and can be brought to scale, 
they will be developed by private companies. It will make a difference 
as to how we as Americans live, because, after all, we as a country 
waste more energy than anybody in the world.
  This is a very serious point. I deeply appreciate the wise counsel of 
the committee leadership, and I strongly urge that this amendment be 
rejected.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BARTLETT. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. BARTLETT. Last week, there was WikiLeaks activity that pointed 
out a huge problem that we in the world face. WikiLeaks released some 
confidential emails that indicated that the Saudis had only 60 percent 
of the oil that they had advertised they had. I think this is probably 
true of most of the OPEC countries that were incentivized to exaggerate 
their oil reserves when they were permitted to pump a percentage of the 
oil reserves.
  Mr. Chairman, there is almost nobody now who doesn't agree that the 
world reached its maximum production of conventional oil in 2006. We've 
been stuck now for about 5 years at 84, 85 million barrels a day of 
oil. Increasingly, the difference between conventional oils, which are 
now falling off in production, and that 84, 85 million barrels a day is 
that it is made up by unconventional oil, like the heavy sour of 
Venezuela and the tar sands of Alberta, Canada.
  Our military has been very wisely pursuing a goal that the rest of us 
should have been involved in. Maybe they read Hyman Rickover's speech 
from 1957 where he noted that, in the 8,000-year recorded history of 
man, the age of oil would be but a blip. He didn't know then how long 
it would last, but he said how long it lasted was important in only one 
regard--the longer it lasted, the more time we would have to plan an 
orderly transition to other sources of energy.
  Of course we have done none of that in spite of the fact that we have 
known for 31 years with absolute certainty that we were going to get 
here today, because by 1980, we were already 10 years down the other 
side of Hubbert's peak as predicted by M. King Hubbert in 1956.
  The military has been attuned to this problem much more than any 
other part of our society, and they have been very wisely pursuing 
alternative fuels because, as we wind down on the available fossil 
fuels, the world will ultimately, of course, move to alternative fuels. 
The military has several reasons for doing this. It is a very 
aggressive program, a very wise program; and I

[[Page 1937]]

think that it would just be tragic if we were to eliminate the funds 
for this.
  They increasingly need to move to alternatives for all of those 
reasons; and the rest of us need to move to alternatives for an 
additional reason, that they now are moving to alternatives that they 
can produce on site to reduce the long supply trails that create so 
many casualties over there.
  They ought to have been doing this earlier. I am delighted they're 
doing it now, and I think it would be a national security tragedy if we 
were to deny them the funds to continue doing this.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
  The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of the 
amendment before this one, Congressman Gutierrez's amendment, to reduce 
funding for the V-22 Osprey.
  This program has been highly troubled since its inception. In fact, 
it was almost canceled several times. As my friend Mr. Gutierrez noted, 
former Defense Secretary Cheney actually called for its cancellation 
several times. During its testing, the V-22 killed 30 people; and in 
April 2010, a V-22 crashed in Afghanistan, killing four more people. 
The GAO has noted that this plane has trouble flying over 8,000 feet or 
in extreme heat.
  You know what? There's more.
  This plane has a problem carrying troops, transporting cargo, and 
operating off naval vessels. No wonder the Pentagon wants to cancel the 
program in its entirety.
  Mr. DICKS. Will the gentlewoman yield?
  Ms. WOOLSEY. I yield to the gentleman from Washington.
  Mr. DICKS. The Pentagon does not want to kill this program. I just 
want to make sure that you understand that, because this is one of the 
highest priorities for the Marine Corps, the Air Force and Special 
Operations. Most of the problems you're talking about have been taken 
care of.
  Ms. WOOLSEY. All right. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. That is my 
understanding of what the Pentagon wanted to do, but I yield to your 
wisdom.
  I do believe that canceling the V-22 and saving $10 billion to $12 
billion over 10 years would be real fiscal savings.
  Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the 
gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Pompeo).
  The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes 
appeared to have it.
  Mr. POMPEO. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further 
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kansas will 
be postponed.

                              {time}  1840


                    Announcement by the Acting Chair

  The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, proceedings 
will now resume on those amendments printed in the Congressional Record 
on which further proceedings were postponed, in the following order:
  Amendment No. 370 by Mr. Flake of Arizona.
  Amendment No. 87 by Mr. Pompeo of Kansas.
  Amendment No. 63 by Mr. Gutierrez of Illinois.
  Amendment No. 86 by Mr. Pompeo of Kansas.
  The Chair will reduce to 2 minutes the time for any electronic vote 
after the first vote in this series.


                 Amendment No. 370 Offered by Mr. Flake

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Arizona 
(Mr. Flake) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 207, 
noes 223, not voting 3, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 41]

                               AYES--207

     Alexander
     Amash
     Baca
     Bachmann
     Baldwin
     Barton (TX)
     Bass (CA)
     Bass (NH)
     Berkley
     Berman
     Bishop (NY)
     Blackburn
     Bono Mack
     Boswell
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Braley (IA)
     Broun (GA)
     Burgess
     Campbell
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardoza
     Carnahan
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Cassidy
     Castor (FL)
     Chabot
     Chaffetz
     Chandler
     Chu
     Cicilline
     Clarke (MI)
     Clarke (NY)
     Clay
     Coble
     Cohen
     Cooper
     Costa
     Crowley
     Cummings
     Davis (IL)
     DeFazio
     DeLauro
     Dent
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Dold
     Donnelly (IN)
     Doyle
     Duffy
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellison
     Ellmers
     Engel
     Eshoo
     Fattah
     Filner
     Fitzpatrick
     Flake
     Flores
     Fortenberry
     Frank (MA)
     Franks (AZ)
     Garrett
     Gibson
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Graves (GA)
     Griffith (VA)
     Grijalva
     Guinta
     Gutierrez
     Hanna
     Harman
     Harris
     Hayworth
     Heinrich
     Heller
     Hensarling
     Herger
     Herrera Beutler
     Himes
     Hirono
     Holt
     Honda
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hurt
     Inslee
     Jackson Lee (TX)
     Jenkins
     Johnson (IL)
     Jones
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kind
     Kucinich
     Labrador
     Landry
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lipinski
     Loebsack
     Lofgren, Zoe
     Lowey
     Lujan
     Lummis
     Lungren, Daniel E.
     Lynch
     Mack
     Manzullo
     Markey
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McClintock
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     Mica
     Michaud
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (CT)
     Myrick
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Neal
     Neugebauer
     Olver
     Pallone
     Pastor (AZ)
     Paul
     Paulsen
     Payne
     Pearce
     Pelosi
     Pence
     Perlmutter
     Peters
     Peterson
     Petri
     Pingree (ME)
     Pitts
     Platts
     Poe (TX)
     Polis
     Pompeo
     Quayle
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Rehberg
     Reichert
     Richardson
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Rokita
     Ross (AR)
     Roybal-Allard
     Royce
     Ryan (OH)
     Ryan (WI)
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schrader
     Schweikert
     Scott (SC)
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Serrano
     Shimkus
     Shuler
     Smith (NE)
     Speier
     Stark
     Stearns
     Stutzman
     Sutton
     Terry
     Thompson (CA)
     Tierney
     Tonko
     Towns
     Tsongas
     Upton
     Van Hollen
     Velazquez
     Walberg
     Walsh (IL)
     Waxman
     Weiner
     Welch
     Wilson (FL)
     Woodall
     Woolsey
     Wu
     Yarmuth
     Yoder
     Young (AK)

                               NOES--223

     Ackerman
     Adams
     Aderholt
     Akin
     Altmire
     Andrews
     Austria
     Bachus
     Barletta
     Barrow
     Bartlett
     Becerra
     Benishek
     Berg
     Biggert
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blumenauer
     Bonner
     Boren
     Brady (PA)
     Brooks
     Brown (FL)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Buerkle
     Burton (IN)
     Butterfield
     Calvert
     Camp
     Canseco
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Coffman (CO)
     Cole
     Conaway
     Connolly (VA)
     Conyers
     Costello
     Courtney
     Cravaack
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Critz
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (KY)
     DeGette
     Denham
     DesJarlais
     Deutch
     Diaz-Balart
     Dicks
     Dreier
     Duncan (SC)
     Edwards
     Emerson
     Farenthold
     Farr
     Fincher
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Forbes
     Foxx
     Frelinghuysen
     Fudge
     Gallegly
     Garamendi
     Gardner
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gonzalez
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (MO)
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanabusa
     Harper
     Hartzler
     Hastings (FL)
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck
     Higgins
     Hinchey
     Hinojosa
     Holden
     Hoyer
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson (IL)
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Jordan
     Kelly
     Kildee
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kissell
     Kline
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Langevin
     Lankford
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Latta
     Lewis (CA)
     LoBiondo
     Long
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Maloney
     Marchant
     Marino
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCaul
     McCotter
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     McNerney
     Meehan
     Meeks
     Miller (NC)
     Moran
     Murphy (PA)
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Pascrell
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Price (NC)
     Reed
     Renacci
     Reyes
     Ribble
     Richmond
     Rigell
     Rivera
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross (FL)
     Rothman (NJ)
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Scalise

[[Page 1938]]


     Schiff
     Schilling
     Schmidt
     Schock
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Sessions
     Sewell
     Sherman
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Southerland
     Stivers
     Sullivan
     Thompson (MS)
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tipton
     Turner
     Visclosky
     Walden
     Walz (MN)
     Wasserman Schultz
     Watt
     Webster
     West
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                             NOT VOTING--3

     Giffords
     Lewis (GA)
     Waters

                              {time}  1908

  Messrs. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, ROTHMAN of New Jersey, GOSAR, Mrs. NOEM, 
Messrs. ROGERS of Alabama, ALTMIRE, OLSON, Ms. EDWARDS, Messrs. LATHAM, 
BECERRA and HINOJOSA changed their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
  Messrs. CLARKE of Michigan, CARDOZA, ROSS of Arkansas, TIERNEY, NEAL, 
ROGERS of Michigan, ALEXANDER, COHEN, LANDRY, FATTAH, INSLEE, CASSIDY, 
Ms. TSONGAS, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mrs. 
BACHMANN, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Messrs. RYAN of Ohio, THOMPSON of 
California, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. SUTTON, Messrs. ENGEL, FORTENBERRY, MILLER 
of Florida, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. DeLAURO, Messrs. ELLISON, MURPHY of 
Connecticut and ROKITA changed their vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


                 Amendment No. 87 Offered by Mr. Pompeo

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kansas 
(Mr. Pompeo) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 72, 
noes 358, not voting 3, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 42]

                                AYES--72

     Alexander
     Amash
     Bass (NH)
     Blackburn
     Broun (GA)
     Burgess
     Burton (IN)
     Campbell
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Coble
     Dold
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellmers
     Fitzpatrick
     Flake
     Frank (MA)
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gibson
     Goodlatte
     Gowdy
     Graves (GA)
     Griffith (VA)
     Heller
     Hensarling
     Herrera Beutler
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hurt
     Jenkins
     Johnson (IL)
     Labrador
     Lummis
     Mack
     Marchant
     McCaul
     McClintock
     McKinley
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Mulvaney
     Myrick
     Neugebauer
     Paul
     Pence
     Petri
     Pitts
     Pompeo
     Quayle
     Rehberg
     Ribble
     Royce
     Ryan (WI)
     Scalise
     Schweikert
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Shimkus
     Smith (NE)
     Stearns
     Stutzman
     Upton
     Walsh (IL)
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Young (IN)

                               NOES--358

     Ackerman
     Adams
     Aderholt
     Akin
     Altmire
     Andrews
     Austria
     Baca
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Baldwin
     Barletta
     Barrow
     Bartlett
     Barton (TX)
     Bass (CA)
     Becerra
     Benishek
     Berg
     Berkley
     Berman
     Biggert
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blumenauer
     Bonner
     Bono Mack
     Boren
     Boswell
     Boustany
     Brady (PA)
     Brady (TX)
     Braley (IA)
     Brooks
     Brown (FL)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Buerkle
     Butterfield
     Calvert
     Camp
     Canseco
     Cantor
     Capito
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardoza
     Carnahan
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Carter
     Castor (FL)
     Chaffetz
     Chandler
     Chu
     Cicilline
     Clarke (MI)
     Clarke (NY)
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Coffman (CO)
     Cohen
     Cole
     Conaway
     Connolly (VA)
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Costello
     Courtney
     Cravaack
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Critz
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (IL)
     Davis (KY)
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     DeLauro
     Denham
     Dent
     DesJarlais
     Deutch
     Diaz-Balart
     Dicks
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Donnelly (IN)
     Doyle
     Dreier
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Emerson
     Engel
     Eshoo
     Farenthold
     Farr
     Fattah
     Filner
     Fincher
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Fudge
     Gallegly
     Garamendi
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Gonzalez
     Gosar
     Granger
     Graves (MO)
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Grijalva
     Grimm
     Guinta
     Guthrie
     Gutierrez
     Hall
     Hanabusa
     Hanna
     Harman
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (FL)
     Hastings (WA)
     Hayworth
     Heck
     Heinrich
     Herger
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinchey
     Hinojosa
     Hirono
     Holden
     Holt
     Honda
     Hoyer
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Inslee
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson (IL)
     Jackson Lee (TX)
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones
     Jordan
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly
     Kildee
     Kind
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kissell
     Kline
     Kucinich
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Landry
     Langevin
     Lankford
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Latta
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lewis (CA)
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Lofgren, Zoe
     Long
     Lowey
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lujan
     Lungren, Daniel E.
     Lynch
     Maloney
     Manzullo
     Marino
     Markey
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCollum
     McCotter
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McMorris Rodgers
     McNerney
     Meehan
     Meeks
     Mica
     Michaud
     Miller (NC)
     Miller, Gary
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Murphy (CT)
     Murphy (PA)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Neal
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Olver
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Paulsen
     Payne
     Pearce
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peters
     Peterson
     Pingree (ME)
     Platts
     Poe (TX)
     Polis
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Reed
     Reichert
     Renacci
     Reyes
     Richardson
     Richmond
     Rigell
     Rivera
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross (AR)
     Ross (FL)
     Rothman (NJ)
     Roybal-Allard
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schilling
     Schmidt
     Schock
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (SC)
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Serrano
     Sewell
     Sherman
     Shuler
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Southerland
     Speier
     Stark
     Stivers
     Sullivan
     Sutton
     Terry
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tierney
     Tipton
     Tonko
     Towns
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Van Hollen
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walz (MN)
     Wasserman Schultz
     Watt
     Waxman
     Webster
     Weiner
     Welch
     West
     Wilson (FL)
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woolsey
     Wu
     Yarmuth
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)

                             NOT VOTING--3

     Giffords
     Lewis (GA)
     Waters

                              {time}  1913

  Messrs. LYNCH and WEINER changed their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


               Amendment No. 63 Offered by Mr. Gutierrez

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois 
(Mr. Gutierrez) on which further proceedings were postponed and on 
which the noes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 105, 
noes 326, not voting 2, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 43]

                               AYES--105

     Amash
     Baldwin
     Bass (CA)
     Bass (NH)
     Becerra
     Berkley
     Berman
     Blumenauer
     Bono Mack
     Boswell
     Braley (IA)
     Campbell
     Capuano
     Cardoza
     Castor (FL)
     Chabot
     Chu
     Clarke (MI)
     Clarke (NY)
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Coble
     Cohen
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Deutch
     Dingell
     Duncan (TN)
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Eshoo
     Farr
     Filner
     Frank (MA)
     Fudge
     Garamendi
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Heller
     Hinchey
     Hirono

[[Page 1939]]


     Holt
     Honda
     Jackson (IL)
     Keating
     Kildee
     Kind
     Kucinich
     Lee (CA)
     Lofgren, Zoe
     Lummis
     Lynch
     Maloney
     Markey
     Matsui
     McCollum
     McDermott
     McGovern
     Michaud
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Myrick
     Nadler
     Neal
     Olver
     Pallone
     Paul
     Payne
     Perlmutter
     Peters
     Petri
     Pingree (ME)
     Polis
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Richmond
     Rohrabacher
     Roybal-Allard
     Royce
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schrader
     Sensenbrenner
     Serrano
     Slaughter
     Speier
     Stark
     Thompson (CA)
     Tierney
     Towns
     Upton
     Velazquez
     Walden
     Walz (MN)
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Weiner
     Welch
     Woolsey
     Wu
     Yarmuth

                               NOES--326

     Ackerman
     Adams
     Aderholt
     Akin
     Alexander
     Altmire
     Andrews
     Austria
     Baca
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Barletta
     Barrow
     Bartlett
     Barton (TX)
     Benishek
     Berg
     Biggert
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Bishop (UT)
     Black
     Blackburn
     Bonner
     Boren
     Boustany
     Brady (PA)
     Brady (TX)
     Brooks
     Broun (GA)
     Brown (FL)
     Buchanan
     Bucshon
     Buerkle
     Burgess
     Burton (IN)
     Butterfield
     Calvert
     Camp
     Canseco
     Cantor
     Capito
     Capps
     Carnahan
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Carter
     Cassidy
     Chaffetz
     Chandler
     Cicilline
     Clyburn
     Coffman (CO)
     Cole
     Conaway
     Connolly (VA)
     Costello
     Courtney
     Cravaack
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Critz
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (IL)
     Davis (KY)
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     DeLauro
     Denham
     Dent
     DesJarlais
     Diaz-Balart
     Dicks
     Doggett
     Dold
     Donnelly (IN)
     Doyle
     Dreier
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Ellmers
     Emerson
     Engel
     Farenthold
     Fattah
     Fincher
     Fitzpatrick
     Flake
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gallegly
     Gardner
     Garrett
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gibson
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Gonzalez
     Goodlatte
     Gosar
     Gowdy
     Granger
     Graves (GA)
     Graves (MO)
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Griffith (VA)
     Grimm
     Guinta
     Guthrie
     Hall
     Hanabusa
     Hanna
     Harman
     Harper
     Harris
     Hartzler
     Hastings (FL)
     Hastings (WA)
     Hayworth
     Heck
     Heinrich
     Hensarling
     Herger
     Herrera Beutler
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinojosa
     Holden
     Hoyer
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Hurt
     Inslee
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson Lee (TX)
     Jenkins
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson (IL)
     Johnson (OH)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones
     Jordan
     Kaptur
     Kelly
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kissell
     Kline
     Labrador
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Landry
     Langevin
     Lankford
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Latta
     Levin
     Lewis (CA)
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Long
     Lowey
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lujan
     Lungren, Daniel E.
     Mack
     Manzullo
     Marchant
     Marino
     Matheson
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCaul
     McClintock
     McCotter
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McKinley
     McMorris Rodgers
     McNerney
     Meehan
     Meeks
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller (NC)
     Miller, Gary
     Moran
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (CT)
     Murphy (PA)
     Napolitano
     Neugebauer
     Noem
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Nunnelee
     Olson
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Paulsen
     Pearce
     Pelosi
     Pence
     Peterson
     Pitts
     Platts
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Posey
     Price (GA)
     Price (NC)
     Quayle
     Reed
     Rehberg
     Reichert
     Renacci
     Reyes
     Ribble
     Richardson
     Rigell
     Rivera
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rokita
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross (AR)
     Ross (FL)
     Rothman (NJ)
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Ryan (WI)
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Scalise
     Schiff
     Schilling
     Schmidt
     Schock
     Schwartz
     Schweikert
     Scott (SC)
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, Austin
     Scott, David
     Sessions
     Sewell
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Shuler
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sires
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Southerland
     Stearns
     Stivers
     Stutzman
     Sullivan
     Sutton
     Terry
     Thompson (MS)
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tipton
     Tonko
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Van Hollen
     Visclosky
     Walberg
     Walsh (IL)
     Wasserman Schultz
     Webster
     West
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Wilson (FL)
     Wilson (SC)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)
     Young (IN)

                             NOT VOTING--2

     Giffords
     Lewis (GA)

                              {time}  1918

  Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California changed her vote from ``aye'' to 
``no.''
  Messrs. CLEAVER, RICHMOND, and DEUTCH changed their vote from ``no'' 
to ``aye.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.


                 Amendment No. 86 Offered by Mr. Pompeo

  The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a 
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kansas 
(Mr. Pompeo) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which 
the noes prevailed by voice vote.
  The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
  The Clerk redesignated the amendment.


                             Recorded Vote

  The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The Acting CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 109, 
noes 320, not voting 4, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 44]

                               AYES--109

     Adams
     Altmire
     Amash
     Bachus
     Barton (TX)
     Benishek
     Bishop (UT)
     Blackburn
     Bono Mack
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Broun (GA)
     Bucshon
     Burgess
     Burton (IN)
     Camp
     Campbell
     Cassidy
     Chabot
     Chaffetz
     Coble
     Conaway
     Costello
     Dent
     Duffy
     Duncan (SC)
     Duncan (TN)
     Ellmers
     Flake
     Garrett
     Gingrey (GA)
     Gohmert
     Goodlatte
     Gowdy
     Graves (GA)
     Griffith (VA)
     Guinta
     Hall
     Harris
     Hayworth
     Heller
     Hensarling
     Herger
     Herrera Beutler
     Huelskamp
     Huizenga (MI)
     Hurt
     Jenkins
     Johnson (IL)
     Johnson (OH)
     Jones
     Jordan
     Labrador
     Landry
     Lankford
     Lummis
     Mack
     Manzullo
     McClintock
     McKinley
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Mulvaney
     Murphy (CT)
     Myrick
     Neugebauer
     Nugent
     Nunes
     Olson
     Paul
     Pence
     Peters
     Pitts
     Platts
     Poe (TX)
     Pompeo
     Posey
     Quayle
     Reed
     Renacci
     Ribble
     Rokita
     Royce
     Ryan (WI)
     Scalise
     Schakowsky
     Schweikert
     Scott (SC)
     Scott, Austin
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Smith (NE)
     Southerland
     Stearns
     Stutzman
     Tipton
     Upton
     Walberg
     Walden
     Walsh (IL)
     Webster
     Whitfield
     Wilson (SC)
     Woodall
     Yoder
     Young (AK)
     Young (IN)

                               NOES--320

     Ackerman
     Aderholt
     Akin
     Alexander
     Andrews
     Austria
     Baca
     Bachmann
     Baldwin
     Barletta
     Barrow
     Bartlett
     Bass (CA)
     Bass (NH)
     Becerra
     Berg
     Berkley
     Berman
     Biggert
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Black
     Blumenauer
     Bonner
     Boren
     Boswell
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Brooks
     Brown (FL)
     Buchanan
     Buerkle
     Butterfield
     Calvert
     Canseco
     Cantor
     Capito
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardoza
     Carnahan
     Carney
     Carson (IN)
     Carter
     Castor (FL)
     Chandler
     Chu
     Cicilline
     Clarke (MI)
     Clarke (NY)
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Coffman (CO)
     Cohen
     Cole
     Connolly (VA)
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Courtney
     Cravaack
     Crawford
     Crenshaw
     Critz
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Culberson
     Cummings
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (IL)
     Davis (KY)
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     DeLauro
     Denham
     DesJarlais
     Deutch
     Diaz-Balart
     Dicks
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Dold
     Donnelly (IN)
     Doyle
     Dreier
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Emerson
     Engel
     Eshoo
     Farenthold
     Farr
     Fattah
     Filner
     Fincher
     Fitzpatrick
     Fleischmann
     Fleming
     Flores
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Foxx
     Frank (MA)
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Fudge
     Gallegly
     Garamendi
     Gardner
     Gerlach
     Gibbs
     Gibson
     Gonzalez
     Gosar
     Granger
     Graves (MO)
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Griffin (AR)
     Grijalva
     Grimm
     Guthrie
     Gutierrez
     Hanabusa
     Hanna
     Harman
     Harper
     Hartzler
     Hastings (FL)
     Hastings (WA)
     Heck
     Heinrich
     Higgins
     Himes
     Hinchey
     Hinojosa
     Hirono
     Holden
     Holt
     Honda
     Hoyer
     Hultgren
     Hunter
     Inslee
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson (IL)
     Jackson Lee (TX)
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Kaptur
     Keating
     Kelly
     Kildee
     Kind
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kinzinger (IL)
     Kissell
     Kline
     Kucinich
     Lamborn
     Lance
     Langevin
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Latta
     Lee (CA)
     Levin
     Lewis (CA)
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Lofgren, Zoe
     Long
     Lowey
     Lucas
     Luetkemeyer
     Lujan
     Lungren, Daniel E.
     Lynch
     Maloney
     Marchant
     Marino
     Markey
     Matheson
     Matsui

[[Page 1940]]


     McCarthy (CA)
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCaul
     McCollum
     McCotter
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McHenry
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McMorris Rodgers
     McNerney
     Meehan
     Meeks
     Michaud
     Miller (NC)
     Miller, George
     Moore
     Moran
     Murphy (PA)
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Neal
     Noem
     Nunnelee
     Olver
     Owens
     Palazzo
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor (AZ)
     Paulsen
     Payne
     Pearce
     Pelosi
     Perlmutter
     Peterson
     Petri
     Pingree (ME)
     Polis
     Price (GA)
     Price (NC)
     Quigley
     Rahall
     Rangel
     Rehberg
     Reichert
     Reyes
     Richardson
     Richmond
     Rigell
     Rivera
     Roby
     Roe (TN)
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Rooney
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Ross (AR)
     Ross (FL)
     Rothman (NJ)
     Roybal-Allard
     Runyan
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schiff
     Schilling
     Schmidt
     Schock
     Schrader
     Schwartz
     Scott (VA)
     Scott, David
     Serrano
     Sewell
     Sherman
     Shimkus
     Shuler
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Sires
     Slaughter
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Speier
     Stark
     Stivers
     Sullivan
     Sutton
     Terry
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Thompson (PA)
     Thornberry
     Tiberi
     Tierney
     Tonko
     Towns
     Tsongas
     Turner
     Van Hollen
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz (MN)
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watt
     Waxman
     Weiner
     West
     Westmoreland
     Wilson (FL)
     Wittman
     Wolf
     Womack
     Woolsey
     Wu
     Yarmuth
     Young (FL)

                             NOT VOTING--4

     Giffords
     King (IA)
     Lewis (GA)
     Welch

                              {time}  1924

  Mrs. McMORRIS RODGERS changed her vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
  So the amendment was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
  The Acting CHAIR. The Committee will rise informally.
  The Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Fleischmann) assumed the chair.

                          ____________________