[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 157 (2011), Part 1]
[House]
[Pages 551-553]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                          A TIME FOR SACRIFICE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 5, 2011, the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf) is recognized 
for 30 minutes.
  Mr. WOLF. Mr. Speaker, ``On a blistering evening in Phoenix recently, 
a group of prominent civic leaders met to talk about America. It didn't 
take long for the conversation to get around to the fall of the Ottoman 
Empire.
  ``That's what happens when smart Americans get to talking about 
politics these days.
  ``Topic A is the growing sense that our best days as a Nation are 
behind us, that our kids won't live as well as we did, that China is in 
the driver's seat.''
  Those were the opening words of an October 2010 Time magazine piece, 
authored by veteran reporter Joe Klein, who canvassed the country 
during the height of the campaign season.
  Klein's assessment of the national mood was underscored by New York 
Times columnist David Brooks, who recently wrote: ``The current sour 
mood is not just caused by high unemployment. It emerges from the fear 
that America's best days are behind it.''
  I believe this foreboding national anxiety is born of certain 
realities--exploding debts and deficits, shuttered factories, rising 
unemployment, bloated government, and an acrimonious tenor to our 
national discourse. People fear that America's influence is waning and 
our ``shining city on a hill'' is dimming.
  I must admit to sharing these same anxieties as a father of five and 
grandfather of 15. I have never been more concerned about my country's 
future. Yet I do not believe that the realization of these fears is 
inevitable. We can walk back from the precipice. We have options. 
Sober-minded people believe that we must dramatically change course, 
especially as it relates to our ballooning national debt and deficit--
and I agree.
  Yet, are America and her leaders willing to make the tough decisions 
that are necessary?
  The lyrics in Simon and Garfunkel's song ``The Boxer''--``Man hears 
what he wants to hear and disregards the rest''--aptly describe the 
mood in Washington when it comes to addressing Federal spending.
  Within days of the President's fiscal commission report on the dire 
consequences of the failure to address growing mandatory spending, it 
was business as usual with Congress passing and the Obama 
administration supporting a tax and spending bill with an $857 billion 
price tag that included a yearlong ``payroll tax holiday,'' raiding the 
Social Security trust fund at a cost of $112 billion, without paying 
for it, thereby increasing the national debt.
  So the question before us is: Will Washington summon the courage and 
the fortitude to make the tough decisions, to govern based on principle 
and not politics, to lead the country toward a brighter tomorrow even 
if it means sacrificing in the short term?
  Historically, Americans are willing to sacrifice.
  Many of our countrymen have made the ultimate sacrifice on our own 
shores and in distant lands, in places like Antietam, Normandy, Saigon, 
Kandahar, and Baghdad.
  It is on their shoulders we stand--wobbly at times, but stand 
nonetheless. The Nation's future now falls to us. Will we step up to 
the plate or will we fail to act?
  For too long, routinely increasing the amount of money that 
government can borrow without taking any action to stem the country's 
growing debt has been standard operating procedure; but the storm 
warning signs have been posted, and I am heeding their ominous call.
  When Congress is asked to increase the statutory debt limit, which 
will likely happen in the next few months, I will vote ``no'' unless--
and let me be completely clear here--there is a firm commitment to deal 
with the larger issue or the vote itself is tied to a plan to put 
America on a path to financial responsibility.
  I have come to this decision based on a multitude of factors that I 
will explore in the remaining time. Consider these grim realities:
  Our Nation is now more than $14 trillion in debt. We have accumulated 
a $1 trillion deficit every year. Just last Thursday, both Moody's 
Investment Service and Standard & Poor's again cautioned the U.S. that 
its coveted AAA credit rating is at risk if the country's deteriorating 
fiscal situation is not corrected.
  The practical implications of a downgraded credit rating are severe. 
The cost to borrow money will rise. Everything from a home loan to a 
car loan to a student loan will increase. Interest on the debt was $202 
billion in 2010. That's nearly $4 billion a week. In 2021, interest on 
the debt is projected to be $1 trillion a year, or roughly $2.7 billion 
a day.
  Unsustainable debt in Europe and the resulting economic woes and 
austerity measures led to riots in the streets. Is it just a matter of 
time before we see that at home?
  If we are on the same trajectory as these countries, their 
unemployment numbers should give us pause. Spain was at a whopping 19.8 
percent in December.
  Noted historian Niall Ferguson authored a piece in the April 2010 
Foreign Affairs, exploring the theory that great empires often decline 
swiftly. From Rome to the Ming Dynasty to the British Empire, history 
is rife with examples of seemingly invincible world powers that 
collapse in a short period of time.
  Ferguson adds that, while there are varied theories about why each of 
these empires declined in such short order, he said, ``Most imperial 
falls are associated with fiscal crises.''
  If paying $202 billion a year in interest alone isn't a fiscal 
crisis, I don't know what is. Is America heading off a cliff?
  Consider that last year a report from the Congressional Budget Office 
revealed that for the first time in 25 years Social Security was taking 
in

[[Page 552]]

less in taxes than it was spending on benefits. In addition, recent 
reports found that as 2011 opens, the first of the baby boomers will 
turn 65 at the rate of 10,000 a day for the next 19 years. Or consider 
that just over the past decade foreign ownership of U.S. debt has 
increased significantly from 5 percent 40 years ago to 46 percent 
today.
  If the U.S. does not begin to rein in spending, every penny of the 
Federal budget will go to interest on the debt and entitlement spending 
by 2028. This has grave implications for a host of national priorities.
  Ferguson is not alone in his warnings.
  In 2007, then-U.S. Comptroller General David Walker warned of 
``striking similarities'' between America's current situation and the 
fall of the Roman Empire.
  Respected business leader Norm Augustine, who chaired a National 
Academies' Commission on American Competitiveness that resulted in the 
landmark ``Gathering Storm'' report, captured well the situation in 
which America now finds itself when he said, ``In the technology-driven 
economy in which we live, Americans have come to accept leadership as 
the natural and enduring state of affairs; but leadership is highly 
perishable. It must be constantly re-earned.''

                              {time}  1350

  He went on to say, ``Unless we do things dramatically different, 
including strengthening our investments in research and education, the 
21st century will belong to China and India.''
  As America sinks deeper into debt, we seem satisfied to live utterly 
in the moment with no concern for the future. And as our own 
investments in the future lag, China is forging ahead, making critical 
gains in education while our children are left in the wake.
  One woman in Arizona who spoke to Klein during his heartland travel 
said pointedly, ``We seem to be mired in mediocrity while China is 
steaming ahead.'' Do we really want the 21st century, this century, to 
be the Chinese century? Do we really want to leave our children a 
country mired in mediocrity?
  Last year, a 5-year followup report titled ``Rising Above the 
Gathering Storm, Revisited'' noted that ``Almost one-third of U.S. 
manufacturing companies responding to a recent survey say they are 
suffering from some level of skills shortages.'' This failure to train 
the next generation of engineers and scientists has a direct bearing on 
our economy. The U.S. graduates only half the number--half the number--
of physicists today than we did in 1956.
  The Gathering Storm report determined that, for the first time in our 
Nation's history, the younger generation of Americans is less well 
educated than its parents, and warned that ``the United States appears 
to be on a course that will lead to a declining standard of living for 
our children and our grandchildren.''
  Against this backdrop, roughly half of America's outstanding publicly 
held debt is now foreign owned, with China and Saudi Arabia among the 
largest holders. Saudi Arabia was home to many of the 9/11 terrorists. 
Saudi Arabia's radical Wahhabism is taught in some of the most 
extremist mosques and madrassas, including up on the Afghan-Pakistan 
border. Their textbooks are filled with hateful messages about minority 
faiths, including Christians and Jews.
  A recent New York Times story reported that, ``Saudi donors remain 
the chief financiers of Sunni militant groups like al Qaeda.'' Is this 
a country we want to be beholden to financially? Or what about 
Communist China? It is well documented by the U.S. intelligence 
community that China's attempt to spy on U.S. agencies and businesses 
are the most aggressive of all foreign intelligence organizations and, 
according to the FBI, ``pose a significant threat to the national 
security'' and compromise U.S. critical national assets.
  China also routinely violates the basic human rights of its own 
people. Even this week, as Chinese President Hu Jintao is afforded the 
pomp and circumstance of a White House state dinner, Catholic bishops, 
Protestant pastors, and Tibetan monks are in Chinese jails for 
practicing their faith.
  I've seen how China plundered Tibet. China's abuses do not stop at 
home. They are a significant arms supplier to the genocidal regime in 
Khartoum, Sudan. Do we really want China to be our banker? All of these 
realities must prompt some soul-searching on the part of our Nation's 
leadership.
  Almost 5 years ago, during the last Republican majority, I came to 
the floor of the House proposing an independent bipartisan commission 
to address unsustainable Federal spending. It would put everything on 
the table--entitlements, all other spending, and tax policy. The SAFE 
Commission--short for Securing America's Future Economy--would operate 
in a transparent way, holding public meetings across the country to 
hear from the American people and give them a vested interest in the 
outcome. Further, it would require Congress to vote on its 
recommendations.
  I reintroduced this legislation with Congressman Jim Cooper in the 
110th and 111th Congresses. Senators Kent Conrad and Judd Gregg 
introduced a similar bill calling for a deficit commission that became 
the blueprint for the President's National Commission on Fiscal 
Responsibility and Reform, or the Simpson-Bowles Commission.
  I give credit to the deficit commission. I certainly didn't agree 
with every part of its report, but the commission's work was an 
important step in moving the national conversation forward. It put 
forth serious ideas rather than just kicking the can down the road. And 
had I been appointed to the commission, while supporting some changes, 
I would have voted for its final report. I commend its members who 
voted yes, such as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, a 
champion of low taxes, for having the courage to do so.
  The plan set forth by the Simpson-Bowles Commission--supported by a 
majority of the commission's 18 members--makes it clear that addressing 
the debt and the deficit isn't just a simple exercise in rooting out 
waste, fraud, and abuse. It is all well and good to eliminate earmarks, 
fraud, waste, and abuse and rein in discretionary spending, but these 
things alone do not come close to solving the debt and the deficit.
  The infamous bank robber Willie Sutton reportedly said he robbed 
banks ``because that's where the money is.'' In our government, the 
money is in entitlements--Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Let 
me say it again: If we do not deal with Medicare, Medicaid and Social 
Security, we cannot solve this problem. We need to do it in a way that 
really fixes the problem for us and for the next generation. We need to 
do it in a way that strengthens America, creating economic growth and 
jobs. This will be difficult and at times controversial, but the longer 
we wait we can be certain that it will become more difficult and more 
controversial.
  The commission's forthright assessment about what is necessary to put 
us in good fiscal standing was a step in the right direction. The 
success of any endeavor, however, is predicated on actively involving 
the American people and must require an up-or-down vote in Congress. 
The President's commission came up short in that regard.
  We have a divided government, which necessitates a bipartisan 
solution, something that can be passed and be enacted into law, and the 
sooner the better. If we neglect to do this, America will decline, and 
it will decline on our watch. We will have failed our children and 
grandchildren. We will have broken faith with the Founding Fathers and 
past generations who have sacrificed greatly to make this Nation, our 
Nation, a shining city on a hill.
  We can no longer ignore the albatross of debt around our collective 
necks. That is why, unless there is a firm commitment to deal with the 
larger financial crisis or the vote itself is tied to a possible debt 
solution, I will vote against the debt limit increase. And again, I 
urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to consider doing the 
same.
  I don't say this lightly. I am fully aware of the implications. In a 
recent

[[Page 553]]

letter to congressional leadership, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner 
spoke in near apocalyptic terms about the consequences of default. Even 
if just a fraction of his analysis is accurate, it is clear that this 
isn't a decision to be made casually. It is precisely because the 
stakes are so high that I believe the debt limit vote can serve as a 
trigger to force congressional action that otherwise will not be taken.
  The country does not currently have a credit card limit, and we need 
one in order to stop the mortgaging of our country's future. Failure to 
act now on fiscal problems will ensure that in the future there will be 
tax increases and drastic entitlement reductions, and no money for 
important discretionary spending such as infrastructure, national 
security, medical research, and education. The longer it takes to 
address this issue, the more draconian the options will be when the 
Nation is forced to change course, as it most assuredly will be.
  If you are on Social Security or Medicare, you should insist that the 
Congress and the administration act. If you are a young adult, you 
should be worried that your generation will be significantly less well 
off than your parents' generation.

                              {time}  1400

  If you care about America's global leadership, if you yearn for our 
country to have the resources to combat global scourges, if you hope 
for the day when there is a cure for cancer and Alzheimer's, you should 
press Congress and the administration to step up to the plate now.
  We must all ask ourselves: Do we want to make a point or do we want 
to make a difference? If the answer is the latter, then it is clear 
that this is a conversation we need to be having today. We must not put 
it off.
  At his 1796 farewell address, George Washington admonished his fellow 
countrymen, ``We should avoid ungenerously throwing upon posterity the 
burden of which we ourselves ought to bear.'' An apt charge for today's 
political leadership.
  A brief word to America's faith community, who should be intimately 
concerned with the moral component of this crisis. If we say we care 
about the poor, we must speak up, for they will be the hardest hit if 
we fail to act. If we say we are passionate about justice, then we must 
not be complicit in committing a massive generational injustice.
  Not only is our current course immoral, it is un-American. 
Generations past have always passed the torch of the American Dream to 
their children and their grandchildren. Presently, we're poised to hand 
off the struggling flicker of a flame.
  The implications of an America on decline also has ripple effects the 
world over.
  In a December 5 Washington Post Outlook piece, author Robert Kaplan 
hauntingly writes, ``America's ability to bring a modicum of order to 
the world is simply fading in slow motion.'' A look at the daily 
headlines and we are reminded that the world is a much more dangerous 
place when our Nation is perceived as weak, or worse yet, when that 
perception becomes a reality.
  Surely we can agree on the enormity of what is at stake. The precise 
blueprint for how to move forward may seem blurry at times, but the 
implications of doing nothing must propel us onward.
  If we summon the courage to act, I believe we can see a rebirth in 
America marked by grand innovations in science and technology that are 
the wonders of the world, advances in medical research that save 
millions of lives, and further exploration into the remaining frontier 
of space and much more.
  Columnist Tony Blankley wrote recently, ``America has become a great 
Nation because we have been an optimistic people who insist on both 
success and liberty. America's can-do spirit has been the wonder of the 
ages. It has raised us from a handful of farmers to the colossus of the 
planet. And if we can regain that spirit, there is not a reason in the 
world that the 21st century will not be the American century--just as 
the 20th century was.''
  I was reminded once again of that unique American spirit on Election 
Day when I stopped by the Snow White Grill in Winchester, Virginia. 
While I was there, one man said to me, ``We are ready! We are prepared 
to sacrifice. We're ready to do what's right.'' And several others at 
the lunch counter echoed the same.
  But the question remains: Are America's leaders prepared to 
sacrifice? Are America's leaders prepared to do what's right?
  Battle lines have been drawn on both sides.
  The MoveOn.orgs of the left and the Americans for Tax Reform of the 
right have wielded their political influence with remarkable effect, 
only to paralyze the Congress and the Obama administration on arguably 
the most important issue of our time. I am not prepared to continue to 
let that happen.
  In 1787, on the final day of the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin 
Franklin was said to have wept when he signed the document. James 
Madison wrote in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, ``Whilst the last 
members were signing it,'' he said, ``Dr. Franklin, looking towards the 
President's chair, at the back of which a rising sun happened to be 
painted, observed to a few members near him that painters had found it 
difficult to distinguish in their art a rising sun from a setting 
sun.''
  And then Dr. Franklin remarked that during the course of the session, 
``I have often looked at that picture . . . without being able to tell 
whether it was a rising or setting sun.'' And then Franklin continues, 
``Now . . . I have the happiness to know that it is indeed a rising, 
not a setting sun.''
  Every politician loves to say that the sun has barely begun to rise 
on America and that America's best days are yet ahead.
  If we steel ourselves for tough decisions and commit to doing the 
right thing, if we work for economic and moral rebirth, then we will 
honestly be able to join the chorus of voices reaching back to our 
Nation's founding and echoing across the ages which enjoin us to 
believe that the sun has indeed barely begun to rise on our country and 
that America's best days are yet to come.
  This is a call to action. We are Americans, and we can prevail.

                          ____________________