[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 156 (2010), Part 1]
[Senate]
[Pages 247-249]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                       LESSON FROM MASSACHUSETTS

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, what did we learn yesterday in 
Massachusetts? I guess many things about the feeling of the American 
people. When you take a look at the polls, it is interesting. It is not 
as if it is a very partisan feeling among most Americans. They are not 
happy with either political party, when it comes right down to it, and 
if given a third-party choice, a lot of folks tend to move in that 
direction. It reflects a number of feelings. The first is, we have a 
weak economy and a lot of people unemployed and there is a lot of 
uncertainty. I think that has created anxiety, if not anger. I think 
also it is an issue about whether this Congress

[[Page 248]]

and this administration can respond to the issues that count, that 
matter in people's lives, and do it in a timely fashion. There is a 
frustration that many of the issues we take up seem to take forever, 
and most of them take forever right here in this room because the 
Senate was designed to slow things down and sometimes bring them to a 
halt. That is even adding to the frustration and maybe the anger across 
America.
  When you ask people in polls about the situation in Washington, they 
say two things that are not necessarily consistent. They say: No. 1, I 
am concerned about the debt of this Nation. How much more debt can we 
pile up on future generations and how much more can we mortgage our 
future to foreign lenders such as China that will buy up our debt and 
buy a bigger piece of control of our economy? A legitimate point. But 
the second thing they will say is: Listen, I hope the President and 
Congress will do something to help create jobs to get this country 
moving forward--which, of course, would involve the expenditure of 
Federal funds. They do not always give consistent answers, but it is 
easy to look behind the results in Massachusetts and in other States 
and see that the American people are upset and concerned about the 
current situation. What will we take from this?
  There will be a realignment in the Senate, in terms of going forward. 
There will be 59 Democratic Senators and 41 Republican Senators after 
the new Senator from Massachusetts, Mr. Brown, is sworn into this body. 
But still we will face the issues people want us to deal with.
  When I went home to Illinois, I didn't shy away from health care. I 
took it on the road and went to South Suburban Chamber of Commerce in 
Cook County. That is right near the city of Chicago. Yesterday, I went 
to the Chicago Chamber of Commerce and invited in small businesses to 
talk about health care. What I heard from them I heard in letters and 
e-mails and messages from all over the State; that is, people are 
genuinely concerned. They may feel at least some satisfaction with 
their current health insurance, but they are worried about the future. 
When small businesses stand, as they did yesterday, and say: Our 
premiums went up 17 percent, 20 percent each year and it is 
unsustainable, that is a reality. If we play to a draw here and do 
nothing, it is understandable people will be even more frustrated and 
angry.
  I understand the shortcomings of our effort to reform health care. I 
am humble enough to realize that even our best work may not be perfect 
and may need to be changed in the future. But it is not enough to just 
stop the debate and ignore the problem. I would engage and invite my 
colleagues from the other side of the aisle, if they truly want to 
govern, if they truly want to work with us, please step forward. Show 
us you are willing to sit down and work together; we are and we have 
tried and we will continue to. We should. It is not just a matter of 
health care. It also goes to the question of creating jobs.
  We have an opportunity now to breathe life back into this economy, to 
get more people back to work. Like one of my friends, a Congressman 
from Illinois, Phil Hare, said recently: I get personally ill when I 
hear the term ``jobless recovery.''
  I share his angst and nausea, if that is what it is, over that term. 
There will be no jobless recovery. Until people get back to work, we 
are still in recovery and have not reached our goal yet, which is to 
end the recession with a strong economy and people back to work.
  How will we reach that goal? We need to do something this year, and 
we need to do it quickly so we do not miss a construction season, so we 
can create new opportunities for jobs in building bridges and highways 
and airports and water projects all across America--investment in our 
infrastructure that pays off over the long run and creates jobs 
immediately. That is something we need to do. It will take money to do 
it.
  Fortunately, there is a source. President Bush had his Troubled Asset 
Relief Program and took hundreds of billions of dollars and loaned them 
to financial institutions and companies to get through the worst of the 
recession. Many of those companies are paying us back, some with 
interest. We wish to take the money that is being paid back there and 
invest it back into this economy to get it moving forward.
  This sounds to me like something that Democrats and Republicans 
should agree on. I think we both share the goal of getting out of this 
recession and begin moving forward, but we need a cooperative, 
bipartisan effort for that to be achieved. I hope we can find it. I 
hope we can reach common ground there.
  I believe most of the Senators from most of the States represented 
here have heard from their Governors. My State is struggling. Others 
are as well. There will be layoffs of key personnel--firefighters, 
policemen, and teachers, for example. We should find a way to help 
those States get through this tough patch they have run into because of 
a recession and downturn in revenues. We don't want to see our children 
suffer because teachers are laid off and there are more kids in the 
classroom. We certainly do not want to endanger our communities by 
laying off firefighters or policemen, if that means our safety is 
compromised in our homes and neighborhoods. So there ought to be some 
common ground we can find, both sides of the aisle.
  At the same time, there is a meaningful discussion underway with 
Senators Conrad and Gregg, Democrat and Republican, on long-term 
deficit reduction. In the midst of a recession it is hard, I think 
terribly hard, to argue we will not be adding to the national debt as 
we try to bring ourselves out of the recession. But we clearly need to 
have a plan--a direction and a long-term goal--of reducing our deficit. 
We can reach that goal, and I think we should. We need to do this on a 
bipartisan basis.
  I hope in the days ahead, when the President gives the State of the 
Union Address, he will speak to this and he will try to help us in 
reaching that common goal.
  So whatever the result in Massachusetts, it will, of course, make the 
news today, will diminish in importance as other stories replace it. 
But at the end of the day, we still have responsibilities. We still 
need to deal with the rising cost of health care. We need to deal with 
the fact that 50 million Americans do not have health insurance. We 
need to confront the health insurance companies that are turning down 
people when they need help the most with their health insurance plan. 
We certainly need to address the job situation, making sure our 
government is funding and inspiring new job growth across our country. 
We need to deal with a long-term deficit with a plan that starts to 
bring us out of our national debt or at least reduce our national debt.
  That, to me, represents at least three immediate and attainable goals 
that should be done on a bipartisan basis. Whether we have 60 votes or 
59 votes, those issues still challenge us. So the lesson from 
Massachusetts is the American people are expecting responsible results 
in Washington. We have to deliver them. We can deliver them. But to do 
it, we need a bipartisan approach. We need both Republicans and 
Democrats to work together toward these goals.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor and I suggest the absence of a 
quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Burris). The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. CHAMBLISS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. CHAMBLISS. Mr. President, is the Senate still in morning 
business?
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senate is in morning business.
  Mr. CHAMBLISS. I ask unanimous consent that all time be yielded back 
and that we move to the nomination of Beverly Martin.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

[[Page 249]]



                          ____________________