[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 155 (2009), Part 7]
[Senate]
[Page 8967]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




CALLING ON BRAZIL TO COMPLY WITH THE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF 
                     INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION

  On Tuesday, March 24, 2009, the Senate agreed to S. Res. 37, as 
amended, with its preamble, as amended, as follows:

                               S. Res. 37

       Whereas Sean Goldman is the son of David Goldman and Bruna 
     Goldman, and is a United States citizen and a resident of 
     Tinton Falls, New Jersey;
       Whereas Bruna Goldman took Sean Goldman to Brazil on June 
     16, 2004;
       Whereas after Bruna and Sean Goldman arrived in Brazil, 
     Bruna Goldman informed David Goldman that she would remain 
     permanently in Brazil and would not return Sean Goldman to 
     David Goldman in New Jersey;
       Whereas on August 26, 2004, the Superior Court of New 
     Jersey issued a ruling awarding David Goldman physical and 
     legal custody of Sean Goldman and ordering that Sean Goldman 
     be immediately returned to the United States;
       Whereas David Goldman initiated judicial proceedings in the 
     Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro, under the Convention on the 
     Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at the 
     Hague October 25, 1980 (TIAS 11670) (the ``Convention''), to 
     which both the United States and Brazil are parties;
       Whereas the Convention requires that a child who is a 
     habitual resident of a country that is a party to the 
     Convention, and who has been removed from or retained in a 
     country that is also a party to the Convention in violation 
     of the custodial rights of a parent of that child, be 
     returned to the country of habitual residence;
       Whereas despite the petition filed in the Federal Court of 
     Rio de Janeiro by David Goldman for the return of his child, 
     less than one year after Sean Goldman was taken to Brazil, 
     David Goldman was prevented from exercising his legal custody 
     of Sean Goldman by rulings of the Federal Regional Court and 
     the 3rd Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil;
       Whereas Bruna Goldman passed away in August 2008, and her 
     new husband filed a petition to replace the name of David 
     Goldman with his own name on the birth certificate of Sean 
     Goldman;
       Whereas the new husband of Bruna Goldman filed a petition 
     for custody of Sean Goldman with the 2nd Family Court of 
     Brazil on August 28, 2008;
       Whereas the 2nd Family Court of Brazil granted temporary 
     custody to the new husband of Bruna Goldman, despite specific 
     provisions in the Convention that prohibit action by a family 
     court while a case brought under the Convention is pending;
       Whereas Sean Goldman remains in the temporary custody of 
     the new husband of Bruna Goldman;
       Whereas the Convention requires the Government of Brazil to 
     ``take all appropriate measures to secure within [its 
     territory] the implementation of the objects of the 
     Convention'' and ``to use the most expeditious procedures 
     available'';
       Whereas the Goldman case has been pending in the courts of 
     Brazil since 2004;
       Whereas the Department of State reported in the 2008 report 
     on compliance with the Convention, as required under section 
     2803 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
     1998 (42 U.S.C. 11611), that the judicial authorities of 
     Brazil ``continued to demonstrate patterns of noncompliance 
     with the Convention'';
       Whereas the Special Secretariat for Human Rights of the 
     Presidency of the Republic of Brazil, the central authority 
     for carrying out the Convention in Brazil, wrote to the 
     Office of the Attorney General of Brazil to express concern 
     with the manner in which the 2d Family Court of Brazil 
     conducted the case of Sean Goldman and to state that the 
     issuance of temporary custody rights by the 2d Family Court 
     of Brazil was a violation of the Convention;
       Whereas Sean Goldman is being deprived of his rightful 
     opportunity to live with and be raised by his biological 
     father, David Goldman; and
       Whereas it is consistent with international law that Sean 
     Goldman be reunited with his father, David Goldman, in New 
     Jersey: Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the Senate calls on Brazil--
       (1) to fulfill its obligations under the Convention on the 
     Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at the 
     Hague October 25, 1980 (TIAS 11670); and
       (2) to assist in the safe return of Sean Goldman to his 
     father, David Goldman, in the United States.

                          ____________________