[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 155 (2009), Part 7]
[Senate]
[Pages 8291-8305]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                  NATIONAL SERVICE REAUTHORIZATION ACT

  Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that all 
postcloture time be yielded back, the motion to proceed be agreed to, 
and that after the bill is reported, I, Senator Mikulski, be recognized 
to call up the substitute amendment.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 1388) to reauthorize and reform the national 
     service laws.


                           amendment no. 687

                    (In the nature of a substitute)

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. I call up my amendment which is at the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       The Senator from Maryland [Ms. Mikulski] proposes an 
     amendment numbered 687.

  Ms. MIKULSKI. I ask unanimous consent that reading of the amendment 
be dispensed with.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  (The amendment is printed in today's Record under ``Text of 
Amendments.''
  Ms. MIKULSKI. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. CRAPO. I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call 
be dispensed with.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                 Amendment No. 688 to Amendment No. 687

  Mr. CRAPO. I send an amendment to the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       The Senator from Idaho [Mr. Crapo], for himself and Mr. 
     Corker, proposes an amendment numbered 688 to amendment No. 
     687.

  The amendment is as follows:

 (Purpose: To increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Deposit 
             Insurance Corporation, and for other purposes)

       At the appropriate place, add the following:

     SEC. __. INCREASED BORROWING AUTHORITY OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT 
                   INSURANCE CORPORATION.

       Section 14(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 
     U.S.C. 1824(a)) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$30,000,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$100,000,000,000'';
       (2) by striking ``The Corporation is authorized'' and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(1) In general.--The Corporation is authorized'';
       (3) by striking ``There are hereby'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(2) Funding.--There are hereby''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) Temporary increases authorized.--
       ``(A) Recommendations for increase.--During the period 
     beginning on the date of enactment of this paragraph and 
     ending on December 31, 2010, if, upon the written 
     recommendation of the Board of Directors (upon a vote of not 
     less than two-thirds of the members of the Board of 
     Directors) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
     System (upon a vote of not less than two-thirds of the 
     members of such Board), the Secretary of the Treasury (in 
     consultation with the President) determines that additional 
     amounts above the $100,000,000,000 amount specified in 
     paragraph (1) are necessary, such amount shall be increased 
     to the amount so determined to be necessary, not to exceed 
     $500,000,000,000.
       ``(B) Report required.--If the borrowing authority of the 
     Corporation is increased above $100,000,000,000 pursuant to 
     subparagraph (A), the Corporation shall promptly submit a 
     report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
     Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services 
     of the House of Representatives describing the reasons and 
     need for the additional borrowing authority and its intended 
     uses.''.

  Mr. CRAPO. Mr. President, today we face very difficult economic 
threats in our financial industries. It is important that we consider 
the possibility that our regulatory authorities do not have sufficient 
authority necessary to deal with potential financial institution 
failures. As a result, this is not an acknowledgment that anything like 
that will happen, but there is certainly the threat and concern in our 
financial markets as to whether we need to have additional protective 
authorities.
  The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation protects against the loss 
of insured deposits if a federally insured bank or savings institution 
fails. It is important to note, though, that depositors who have 
deposits at these institutions are protected by Federal guarantees, and 
these guarantees are, in the event of a bank failure, immediately 
protected by the FDIC. It is not the taxpayers but fees and assessments 
paid by the depository institutions themselves that cover the cost of 
this protection. However, the level of borrowing authority the FDIC has 
to provide this protection has not increased since 1991. At that time, 
the amount was set at $30 billion. The assets in the banking industry 
under protection have tripled since that time from $4.5 trillion to 
$13.6 trillion. Yet the borrowing authority of the FDIC has not been 
increased.
  This legislation does two significant things. It increases the 
borrowing authority of the FDIC from $30 billion to $100 billion, 
approximating the percentage increase of the assets under protection 
and the growth in the assets under protection since the original level 
was set in 1991. The bill also authorizes a temporary increase in 
borrowing authority from that $100 billion increased level up to but 
not to exceed $500 billion based on a process that would require the 
concurrence of the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board, and the Treasury 
Department, in consultation with the President. The reason for this 
additional authority is because of the extreme difficulties we are 
facing in our economy now, and we need to ensure

[[Page 8292]]

that the FDIC has the necessary capacity to deal with any such threats.
  This legislation is very important and urgent. The reason I bring it 
forth on this national service legislation is because we don't have 
time to wait to consider this legislation. It exists in a freestanding 
bill form on a bipartisan basis, with Republicans and Democrats in 
strong support of the legislation. I believe there is strong agreement 
throughout the financial industries that this kind of increased 
borrowing authority for the FDIC is helpful and an important piece of 
the solution to the problems we face today.
  As a matter of fact, one of the reasons it is urgent is not only 
because we need to be sure the FDIC is properly protected or in a 
position to properly protect depositors and financial institutions but 
also because in order to deal with this needed fund, the FDIC is 
currently considering significant increases in assessments to our 
Nation's banks. These increased assessments in many cases, in some of 
our smaller and midsize communities, are creating a terrific financial 
threat to the banks, which, in turn, then reduces the potential of 
these banks to engage in lending authority, the type of credit activity 
we want to see happening. So while Congress waits, we see credit being 
further restricted by the failure of Congress to take this action and 
free up the FDIC authority.
  Again, another one of the reasons I bring the amendment today is 
because this legislation, even though it is supported on a broad, 
bipartisan basis, is being caught up with other issues in the Senate 
that could delay its consideration and result in the imposition of 
significantly increased assessments on our Nation's banks. That is the 
cram-down legislation in terms of bankruptcy proposals that have been 
put forward.
  Everyone in this body and throughout Congress and the country 
recognizes that we are having a difficult time dealing with very 
controversial proposals about our bankruptcy laws which have become 
known as the cram-down provisions that may or may not gain support in 
this Senate for passage. I personally think it is unlikely that the 
cram-down legislation will ultimately gain sufficient support in the 
Senate to be passed, but regardless of whether that happens, it is a 
difficult, controversial issue. This legislation, which is not 
difficult and not controversial, is being slowed down by being tied 
with the bankruptcy cram-down provisions. Because of that, it is 
imperative that we move forward as expeditiously as possible, consider 
the amendment, and move forward with this piece of the important 
reforms necessary for us to properly address the credit crisis and the 
financial threats our Nation faces today.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who seeks recognition?
  Ms. MIKULSKI. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. CARPER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Kaufman). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. CARPER. I say to the Presiding Officer, it is kind of ironic that 
both of us, who are from Delaware, are in the Chamber right now, and I 
want to start off by telling a short story about the University of 
Delaware and a visit I had there not long ago. I was invited, as my 
colleague has been invited, to speak to students and to host and be a 
part of a townhall meeting a month or two ago.
  I opened up by talking to the students for a bit of the time, and 
then I took questions or comments from the students. I felt one of the 
most poignant questions was asked at the end of the session. Most of 
the students there were freshmen, sophomores, and juniors.
  One young lady, who asked a question at the end of the session, was a 
senior. She is going to be graduating in a couple months. The question 
on her mind is, frankly, on the minds of a lot of graduating seniors at 
colleges and universities inside of Delaware and throughout our 
country. I might also add, it is on the minds of a lot of folks who are 
about to finish high school or who have finished and are still looking 
for work.
  The young lady who spoke recently at our forum at the University of 
Delaware said: I am going to graduate in May. I am not sure what I am 
going to do. She said: There used to be a lot of employers who came to 
this campus and other campuses looking for people to hire, to come and 
join them at their companies or at their workplaces. She said: Not so 
much of that is going on this year, for reasons I think we all 
understand.
  While I am hopeful and encouraged this is not a permanent phenomenon 
but one that will be short lived, relatively speaking, her concerns are 
justified. I shared with her that when I graduated from Ohio State many 
a moon ago I entered a life of service for about 4\1/2\ or 5 years with 
the U.S. Navy. It was a deal I gladly entered into, Navy ROTC. The Navy 
helped put me through school at Ohio State, and when it was over, I 
owed the Navy some years of my life. I was very pleased to give that 
time, even in the middle of a hot war in Southeast Asia.
  What I suggested to the young woman that day at the University of 
Delaware is that if she decided she did not find the job she wants with 
a company she wants or some other employer she is excited about working 
for, she should consider spending maybe not just a couple of months but 
maybe a year or even two in serving.
  There are any number of opportunities to serve in Delaware and 
throughout the country. In fact, in some ways the need for people to 
serve is greater than it has been in a long time because nonprofits and 
others are cutting back and there is a need for those who will 
volunteer and step forward and say: Here am I. Send me. Or what can I 
do to help out?
  I am not sure to what extent she internalized that message and is 
going to go out and look for opportunities to serve, but I know there 
is a great need for people who will serve.
  For us, part of the challenge is trying to make sure those who want 
to serve can identify the opportunities to serve, those who want to 
make a difference in their lives are given some help and guidance in 
getting to places where they can make a difference with their lives.
  The thing I like most of all about this legislation--we talk a lot 
here about that we ought to be more bipartisan. And God knows I believe 
that. I know the Presiding Officer feels that way. But one of the great 
things about this legislation is that it is about as bipartisan as it 
gets.
  I want to take a moment to commend a couple of folks who are on the 
floor. I see Senator Hatch talking with Senator Dodd. Both of them have 
been very instrumental in this legislation. I commend Senator Mikulski, 
Senator Hatch, Senator Enzi, Senator McCain--I do not know if he is a 
cosponsor of this bill. He has been a big champion of service over the 
years. I commend Senator Kennedy, who I believe was here yesterday. He 
is a huge champion of this legislation. This legislation enjoys broad 
bipartisan support.
  I say to my friend from Connecticut: Good going. Thank you for being 
the wind under our wings on this issue for a long time and for 
continuing to inspire us and encouraging us to go forward.
  A couple years from now--maybe not even that long--I hope I run into 
that young woman again who asked that question at the University of 
Delaware a month or so ago. I hope she says to me: I took your advice. 
I looked around and I found a couple of opportunities where I could 
serve, and I decided to do that for a year or so. At the end of my year 
or so, the job market improved, the economy improved, and I went to 
work for some other employer and went on with the rest of my life.
  One of the things I look for as an employer, one of the things I look 
for when there is a downtime, like right now, a downtime in our 
economy--

[[Page 8293]]

when a lot of people are looking for employment opportunities and maybe 
not finding them, and they have some space to fill in their lives--how 
do they fill up that space? How do they fill up that dead time?
  I am always encouraged when I find someone who says: I decided to go 
out and work with young people to help make sure they were going to be 
successful in life. I worked with veterans. I worked with Boy Scouts or 
Girl Scouts. I worked in Boys & Girls Clubs. I mentored. I did all 
kinds of things.
  The idea behind this legislation is to better ensure that those who 
want to serve--maybe who do not have a lot to do in their lives right 
now; they have some free time they have not had for a long time because 
their studies are over--we want to make sure they will have some 
opportunities, good opportunities, to serve.
  I will close with this: These are the words I actually shared with 
the University of Delaware students the other day. I talked about the 
sources of joy. We always look for joy. Everybody wants to be happy. 
Almost everybody I know wants to be happy. There are any number of 
sources of joy people turn to from time to time.
  In my own life, I have always found the best source of joy--the one 
that never goes away, the one that never disappears, which always can 
be counted on--the best source of joy in our lives is helping other 
people, finding ways to give of ourselves to help other people.
  For those young people in this country who decide to seize on the 
opportunities that will be provided through this legislation's 
enactment, they will have the opportunity to get something. Maybe it 
will provide good letters of recommendation going forward. Maybe it 
will provide for a stronger resume going forward. I think even more 
importantly than that, they are going to do a lot of good for folks 
with their own lives. They are going to do a lot of good for folks. 
They are going to help those people who need to be helped, and maybe, 
as important as anything, the one who serves will enjoy a sense of 
satisfaction that, frankly, is sometimes hard to come by.
  So I again applaud those who provided leadership on this bill, and I 
look forward to supporting it as we go forward this week. Thank you 
very much.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Connecticut.
  Mr. DODD. Mr. President, let me begin by thanking my colleague from 
Delaware for his generous comments. He has been an advocate and strong 
supporter of the notion of service, and for that I thank him. I also 
commend my colleague from Maryland, Senator Mikulski, as well as 
Senator Hatch, Senator Ted Kennedy, and Senator Enzi, who have all been 
strong supporters, over the years, of the idea of providing venues and 
opportunities for people to serve our country in one capacity or 
another.
  I rise this afternoon to offer my support for the Kennedy-Hatch Serve 
America Act. Four and a half decades ago, I was with my parents on a 
very cold January 20, not very far from where I am standing today, 
watching a young man by the name of John F. Kennedy, at the age of 43, 
become the President of the United States on the east front of the 
Capitol. It was a bitter cold day--we had a terrible snowstorm on the 
day before that January 20, 1961. As a very young boy of 12 or 13 years 
of age, I listened to the President excite a generation to get involved 
in things larger than ourselves. I was so motivated by his remarks, as 
were millions of others, that a few years later when I finished 
college, I joined the Peace Corps. I traveled to the Dominican 
Republic, not far from the Haitian border, where I spent 2 years in the 
mountains of that country working with the people in the small village 
of Benito Moncion in the province of Santiago Rodriguez. It was a life-
changing experience. I came back from that experience a very different 
person than when I had left.
  I was joined by millions of others, who went off and joined VISTA, 
the military, and community action organizations all across the 
country. I have been asked so many times over the years why I joined 
the Peace Corps. Why did other people go into the Marine Corps, the 
Justice Department, and serve their country? The reason I have given 
over these last four and a half decades is, because an American 
President asked me to. It's not any more complicated than that. Someone 
asked me to serve, and the thought that someone believed I could do 
something to make a difference was a form of flattery, I suppose, but 
it also provided the opportunity for me to meet that challenge. It did 
so by creating the structures that allowed us to step into a program 
that gave us the opportunity to serve.
  That is what we are doing again here today: providing the structure 
that will allow for people today--who are no different from any other 
generation of Americans over our two centuries as a Republic--to be 
asked to serve. People today want to serve, and they have the same 
desires and ambitions to make a difference for our country in their 
local communities, in our States, and in our Nation.
  What Senator Mikulski, Senator Kennedy, Senator Hatch, and Senator 
Enzi have done with this bill is to create the architecture by which 
when we ask people to serve, they have a place to come. We have a spot 
for you. We have a place where you can make a difference in our 
country. That is the brilliance of this idea. This bill expands 
opportunities not only to college graduates or to those out of graduate 
school; we actually begin in this bill by offering you the opportunity 
to serve as a middle school student, a high school student, or someone 
who does want to go on to higher education. Maybe most exciting of all, 
we offer these opportunities to people who perhaps have the most to 
give--the retirees in our country. The individuals who have been at 
work providing for their families, engaged in business practices by 
which they developed their wisdom and expertise over the years, and who 
have now reached a point in their lives where they would like to share 
that. What a wonderful opportunity for our country to reach out to that 
generation of retirees and say: Here is an opportunity for you to 
continue to make a difference.
  After I finished the Peace Corps, I came back and served for 6 years 
in the Army Reserves, the National Guard. That was a good experience. 
It was very different, obviously, to go off to basic training at Fort 
Dix, NJ, but nonetheless a very worthwhile experience. So service 
covers a wide range of activities. In my case, it was the Peace Corps, 
then it was the Army Reserves, and then it was Big Brothers Big 
Sisters. I was a Big Brother in my State of Connecticut. So service has 
been a major part of my life.
  I would like to think today that to the extent I have made a 
difference in this job, it was affected certainly by my family, first 
and foremost, but also by the people, whose names will never be known 
by others, who had a huge influence on me. People in that small village 
in the Dominican Republic, people in my community in Connecticut, 
people I met in the military service--all have shaped me and taught me 
the lessons of how serving each other, making a difference in each 
other's lives, can make a significant difference for many more.
  In Connecticut, community members, both young and old, are giving 
their time.
  In Hamden, CT, older Americans such as Mozelle Vann, a retired social 
worker, are working to make sure elementary school students don't fall 
through the cracks--one example, one woman, making a difference, 
affecting the lives of students who are going to be enriched and lead 
better lives because Mozelle Vann is giving something back.
  High school students in Waterbury, CT, are giving back to their 
communities by taking part in the Youth Health Service Corps created by 
the Connecticut Area Health Education Center. This organization works 
with disadvantaged high school students interested in pursuing health 
careers. Lord knows we need people to move into professions relating to 
health care. These students complete rigorous training and dedicate 
their time to

[[Page 8294]]

working with nursing home residents. So these high school students, in 
the midst of determining what their futures will hold, are being 
offered the opportunity to learn about health care services, making a 
difference in a nursing home that is most likely shorthanded, and 
serving people in that community.
  This past year, residents worked with students to create a Martin 
Luther King, Jr., commemorative quilt and together discussed Dr. King's 
impact on our Nation.
  There are as many examples as there are communities and individuals 
whom we represent of people who want to serve and want to give 
something back.
  Senators Thad Cochran of Mississippi, my good friend, and I have 
offered four ideas to this bill, and I am very grateful to Senator 
Mikulski, Senator Hatch, Senator Kennedy, and Senator Enzi as well, for 
their willingness to accept these ideas. Representative Rosa DeLauro, 
the Congresswoman from New Haven, CT, is the author of these ideas in 
the House of Representatives.
  The first of these we call the semester of service, giving students a 
chance to give something back, learning early the benefit and the value 
of volunteering, of stepping up and serving your community. The 
Semester of Service Act is one that will allow the opportunity for 
children within the educational system to serve our communities. This 
service-learning will take place right alongside math problems and book 
reports. With a semester of service, we ask our students to not only 
consider themselves residents in their communities but resources to 
them. Just as mine did, I have no doubt that the younger generation 
will respond to that call.
  The Summer of Service Act is also a large part of the bill. The bill 
provides our middle and high school students unique opportunities to 
serve during the summer months. Already in Connecticut, more than 5,500 
students take part in community service activities linked to academic 
achievement. With this legislation, that is something we will be able 
to do across the country.
  The bill also includes many parts of the Encore Service Act, a bill 
Senator Cochran and I authored to help harness the enormous experience 
and wisdom older Americans have to offer in their communities, as I 
mentioned a moment ago. We have all heard about the challenges posed by 
the 78 million baby boomers nearing retirement age. Yet Americans are 
living longer and healthier lives than at any time in our history, and 
it is time to look at that growing population of experienced, capable 
Americans of different professions and backgrounds as the asset it is, 
and to realize what a difference it can make in our country.
  Together, the programs included in this bill will encourage older 
Americans to serve communities with the greatest need, whether through 
AmeriCorps or through the Silver Scholars Program. The legislation also 
offers Encore Fellowships for older Americans who have already had 
full, successful careers to lend their professional expertise and 
experience to the cause of community and public service. It expands the 
capacity and builds on the success of current senior programs. So I 
again commend my colleagues for including that language.
  And finally, we can't talk about expanding service opportunities 
without talking about the AmeriCorps program, which is the heart of 
national service in our country. The Serve America Act will expand 
AmeriCorps to include 250,000 members, allowing many more Americans to 
serve each other. Last year alone, 75,000 AmeriCorps members gave back 
to their communities, and they brought reinforcements. Those 75,000 
members--and this statistic can't be repeated often enough--those 
75,000 AmeriCorps members recruited 2.2 million community volunteers. 
You talk about a ripple effect--having 75,000 people across our country 
in AmeriCorps who then went out and recruited 2.2 million people in 
their communities to get deeply involved and serve those communities. 
That is the benefit. Some discuss the cost of the 75,000 AmeriCorps 
members, but the fact that they were able to attract 2.2 million people 
to also serve is tremendously worthwhile. Which is why I am pleased 
that in this bill, we increase the AmeriCorps education award and peg 
its increases to the Pell Grant.
  I again thank the authors of this bill, of which I am proud to be a 
leading cosponsor, for the accomplishments they have achieved. As I 
said a moment ago, this bill is creating the opportunity for Americans 
to serve. Just as when I was standing on the steps of the east front of 
the Capitol, 45 or 46 years ago, and heard an American President not 
only ask us to serve, but provided with opportunities to do so, today 
we need to provide that same structure, that same ability for people to 
serve. They want to. People are anxious to. It is something all 
Americans take pride in, and it transcends party, partisanship, 
politics and ideology. People want to serve our country. We are 
benefitting from it in ways we can't even imagine. We need to see to it 
that this generation is going to achieve or have the same opportunities 
to fulfill that desire as well.
  For all of the reasons I have mentioned, this bill is very worthy of 
our unanimous support, and I hope it will enjoy that. This is one of 
those moments when I think all of us, despite our political differences 
from time to time, recognize the value of this. Whether it is in faith-
based organizations, whether it is in community organizations, we are a 
richer, stronger, more vibrant nation because people have the 
opportunity to serve each other. There is nothing more gratifying, 
nothing you will ever do that will give you a greater sense of 
gratification than knowing you have helped another human being. 
Particularly in times such as these when people are struggling--losing 
jobs, homes, savings--they want to know if anybody can help. Every 
single one of us can make a difference in the life of somebody else. 
Providing that opportunity today, with the structure that Senator 
Mikulski, Senator Kennedy, Senator Hatch, and Senator Enzi have 
created, is just what we need. So I commend them for it.
  Let me mention as well that I know Mike Crapo, the Senator from 
Idaho, my good friend and a very valuable member of the Banking 
Committee, came to the floor and has offered an amendment, a proposal 
to deal with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Let me say that 
I support what Senator Crapo wants to do. This is an idea that I 
believe is necessary. The problem here is twofold.
  One is, obviously, for this bill, we are hoping to move through 
without amendments. Members have worked very closely together to 
construct this bipartisan bill. That in no way diminishes the point 
Senator Crapo is making. In fact, we are working on another bill that 
includes more than just the Crapo amendment, which will be an important 
addition over the next number of days. We are trying to work it out. I 
hear there are some differences. I would say respectfully to my 
colleague from Idaho that I would hope he might reconsider offering the 
amendment on this bill for the reasons I have mentioned, not because 
his idea lacks merit--I support the idea--but if we add amendments to 
this bill, then it is going to make it that much more difficult to get 
it done.
  Secondly, there is more to do than just what the Crapo amendment 
would suggest, and that is going to require a little more time to put 
that together. There is no immediate emergency here. I have been 
guaranteed by the FDIC, that although they would like it to get done, 
it is not something--I have been told--that in the next number of days 
or so that unless we act, there is a catastrophic event that could 
occur. But clearly we need to move on this. He and others have my 
commitment that we are going to achieve that, but at this hour, at this 
moment on this bill, I would respectfully urge my colleagues, if 
required, to table this amendment and preferably to have the amendment 
withdrawn so we wouldn't have to be in that situation.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, before the Senator from Connecticut 
leaves, I

[[Page 8295]]

wish to thank him for his contribution and remarks in two areas, both 
on the Serve America Act and his comments on the Crapo amendment.
  First, on the Serve America Act, I wish to say on the Senate floor 
that we really appreciate the contribution he has made to this bill. 
When Senator Kennedy and Senator Hatch were working on it, I know they 
had three goals: how we could reinvigorate national service, how we 
could refocus it in a contemporary way, as well as how we could 
reenergize it.
  I think the Senator's ideas were some of the best, involving middle 
school children and so on. They have been outstanding. That is no 
surprise because the Senator has been involved with this not only in 
his own personal life--walking his own talk as a Peace Corps volunteer. 
I remember when we were putting the original national service bill 
together, Senator Dodd was the Senator who reminded the committee that 
the poor needed to serve as well. They are not just passive 
beneficiaries. We always think maybe it is only the affluent and the 
young who can serve. The Senator from Connecticut was the one who said: 
Wait a minute. Everybody can serve. It doesn't matter what your age or 
your income is.
  I think the original bill was better because of the philosophy of the 
Senator. Now we can see that here. It is a philosophy about the 
empowerment of people. We thank the Senator for that.
  On the banking bill, I, too, agree with the Senator. He can offer the 
amendment, but this could sink the bill in the process. I hope he will 
withdraw this amendment and offer it on a more appropriate vehicle.
  Again, I thank the Senator for his work today and for his work as a 
Senator.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Udall of Colorado). The Senator from 
Georgia is recognized.
  Mr. ISAKSON. Mr. President, I am glad the Senator from Connecticut 
and the Senator from Utah are on the Senate floor. I rise to speak in 
favor of the National Service Act and to commend the Health, Education, 
Labor and Pensions Committee for the diligent work they did on this 
reauthorization.
  There are a lot of people who will poke fun at voluntarism or at 
programs or say we are always creating new things and spending more. 
This bill, with a bipartisan effort by Senators Enzi, Dodd, Mikulski, 
and others, is to ensure that the 40 programs we had under the National 
Service Act are brought down to 24 programs and to see that meaningful, 
good programs are empowered.
  This bill doesn't pay people to volunteer. It provides capital for 
the infrastructure for communities to develop the programs for 
volunteers; for example, Hands on Georgia and Hands on Atlanta. Hands 
on Atlanta is a program of volunteers that addresses the 52 percent of 
the young children in Atlanta elementary schools who are not reading at 
grade level. Volunteers have been mobilized over the last 4, 5 years to 
give the greatest gift of all--the gift of literacy--and improve the 
standing of our children.
  It is no small secret that one of the reasons our school 
superintendent in Atlanta was selected the superintendent of the year 
recently by the national association was because of the dramatic 
program of bringing people into the school system to help uplift our 
students. So voluntarism is important to us in the United States, and 
it is important to our reputation around the world.
  Secondly, I support this legislation because I have an affinity for a 
young lady named Michelle Nunn. A former U.S. Senator from Georgia, Sam 
Nunn, was a distinguished leader here for 24 years and served our State 
well. He is personally a good friend of mine. His daughter Michelle has 
dedicated her life to the organization of volunteer efforts in this 
country to improve the plight of other people. She now heads the Points 
of Light Foundation, started by George Herbert Walker Bush, which helps 
people around the country. For Michelle's everlasting support and 
contribution to voluntarism, I give her credit.
  I also want to take a minute--Senator Dodd served in the Peace Corps, 
and I wanted him to hear this because I want to acknowledge his support 
on this effort, along with Senators Hatch and Kennedy. This past 
Saturday, I attended one of the most moving ceremonies of my life--
moving in a sad way but also in an uplifting way.
  Unfortunately, a wonderful young lady, 24 years old, from Cumming, 
GA, Kate Puzey, was killed in Benin, Africa, on March 11. She was a 
Peace Corps worker who graduated first in her class in high school, was 
an honors graduate from William and Mary, and she studied French in 
Paris to learn the language that led her to be able to go to this part 
of the world and teach this poor African nation about agriculture and 
other skills. She served since July of 2007 and was in the last 2 
months of her service in Benin.
  I went to this service because I felt moved. I am ranking member of 
the African Subcommittee on Foreign Relations. Paul Coverdell, who 
served in the seat I now hold, was a director of the Peace Corps. I 
felt moved that morning when I got to go to the service and sit in the 
back of the room and pay my respects to a great American. I left having 
listened to 12 eulogies by young people whose lives were changed by 
Kate. The acting director of the Peace Corps, Ms. Jody Olsen, delivered 
a beautiful eulogy.
  I realized how much voluntarism means to the United States, not just 
on our shores but in Africa and on continents around the world. I 
commend people such as Senator Dodd who have given time in the Peace 
Corps. I ask the Senate to give its unanimous support to this 
legislation. I dedicate this speech in honor of Kate Puzey, to her 
life, and what she did as a Georgian and as a volunteer. She joined the 
Peace Corps and changed the plight, the lives, the hopes, and in fact 
the future of children in that small country on the west coast of 
Africa.
  God bless the Peace Corps and the life of Kate Puzey. And thanks to 
those who have volunteered and to the committee that has brought this 
National Service Act reauthorization to the floor of the Senate.
  Mr. DODD. If my colleague will yield.
  Mr. ISAKSON. Yes.
  Mr. DODD. I thank him for his gracious comments about this young 
woman. My nephew graduated from college a few years ago and was in 
Africa for approximately a year and a half. He spent 6 months in Guyana 
working with the people there, increasing awareness on issues such as 
HIV/AIDS. These are wonderful examples, like the young woman the 
Senator described, of people who make a difference.
  The great thing about the Peace Corps is not just helping people in a 
struggling country get back on their feet but it is the experience of 
returning home from service. It is the lessons learned that we bring 
back to our communities. There are 180,000 of us who are returned 
volunteers since the first group left from the south lawn of the White 
House to go to Ethiopia, and how blessed we are with the richness of 
opportunities here and the lessons learned.
  I commend my colleague for being at that ceremony and reflecting on 
the impact this one individual made, this young woman, in service of 
our country. I can't think of a more compelling argument on why this 
bill being offered by our colleagues deserves our unanimous support. 
Again, I thank the Senator for his comments.
  Mr. ISAKSON. Mr. President, the Senator and I are precisely the same 
age, and he and I were both inspired by President Kennedy's inaugural 
address and the establishment of the Peace Corps. It is ironic that the 
next President who embraced voluntarism in his office happened to be 
George Herbert Walker Bush. So we had a great Democrat and a great 
Republican who encouraged us to volunteer to help the plight of others. 
It is a great tribute to this bill and to America.
  Mr. DODD. It is also not widely known--Senator Isakson mentioned 
President Bush and the Thousand Points of Light Program, which he 
sponsored--that President Ronald Reagan was a strong supported of the 
Peace Corps, increasing the budget significantly. Loret Ruppe was the 
director. I served with her husband, who was

[[Page 8296]]

a Congressman from Michigan. She was a magnificent director of the 
Peace Corps. Every year of Ronald Reagan's Presidency, he supported the 
Peace Corps program. So it is a joy to see the bipartisan support that 
my colleague has mentioned.
  Mr. ISAKSON. I thank the Chair and yield back my time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah is recognized.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I thank the distinguished Senator from 
Georgia. He has been a prime sponsor of this legislation. There are 
very few people around here I admire any more than I admire him. He is 
a terrific addition to the Senate. I am honored that he would be on 
this bill and be willing to speak for it. That means a lot to me, and 
it is going to mean a lot to the folks in his home State and all over 
this country. It is the right thing to do. I thank him personally for 
being such a great Senator.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I wish to take a moment to discuss the role 
of the State service commissions under this bill and the existing 
national service system. One of the things that was very important to 
me when we drafted this legislation was to make sure the States were 
given a primary role in the program so we would have 50 State 
laboratories using this program. We didn't just want to add a level of 
Federal bureaucracy. Time and time again, it has been shown that State 
governments are more responsive and in tune with the needs of their 
communities and, with this bill, we will put that resource to good use.
  For those who do not know, State service commissions are Governor-
appointed public agencies or nonprofit organizations made up of more 
than 1,110 commissioners--private citizens helping lead the Nation's 
philanthropic movement. The Nation's 52 State service commissions 
currently grant more than $220 million in AmeriCorps funds and $28 
million in State-based initiatives with State or private funds to 
support citizen service and voluntarism in America.
  In Utah, this role is filled by the Utah Commission on Volunteers, 
which is overseen by our Lieutenant Governor, a great Lieutenant 
Governor named Gary Herbert. They oversee the work of more than 8,000 
Utahans who participate in national service programs, including the 
AmeriCorps, Learn and Serve, and, of course, Senior Corps programs, to 
mention a few.
  The Serve America Act will triple the oversight and programming for 
commissions over the course of the next 5 years, increasing 
participants from 75,000 to 250,000. Effective grants oversight and 
planning by commissions is essential to the integrity of these new 
programs. The State commissions will administer five new corps, five 
grant competitions, and the Serve America fellows program, which is an 
individual placement program that will be administratively intensive 
but vital to get members to rural communities and small organizations.
  Increasingly, State commissions take the lead role of managing 
volunteers and donations in response to natural disasters, which has 
been particularly important in the gulf coast hurricane recovery and 
Midwest flood relief.
  For example, the Iowa Commission on Volunteer Service last year set 
up eight volunteer reception centers, staffed with AmeriCorps members, 
that helped increase and better utilize traditional volunteers in 
Iowa's historic flooding and tornadoes of last summer. Those centers 
connected over 800,000 volunteer hours to families who called in for 
help. These centers became the central points for deployment for faith-
based groups, schools, and businesses that sent volunteers to help.
  AmeriCorps members often led teams of unaffiliated volunteers after 
training them to gut and muck out houses, as well as clear the miles of 
debris that littered the Iowa landscape. This effort was valued at over 
$13 million by FEMA in savings to the taxpayers, and it is still going 
on today. In fact, two of the centers are being run for the rebuilding 
phase and over 1,000 AmeriCorps members will help support the massive 
rebuilding efforts of this past summer.
  I think it is clear the State service commissions are up to the task 
of overseeing much of the work that will be done under the Serve 
America Act. I certainly will be glad to see them take on this much 
larger role that this bill gives them the opportunity to do.
  I am a firm believer of one reason why our economy has run so well in 
the past and one reason why we have a Federal Republic that has lasted 
all these years is because we recognize that with these 50 States, we 
have 50 State laboratories to test out these programs. Then we can pick 
and choose which ones are the most successful and why. It is great to 
have them competing against each other, having them setting examples 
for each other, having them open doors for each other. There is a lot 
to that. This bill basically turns over the effective running of all 
these funds to State representatives and to State volunteer movements 
and commissions, State service commissions, if you will.
  We will learn a lot from this. We have already learned a lot, but we 
will learn even more, and as we move toward 250,000 volunteers under 
this program, that will be extended to probably at least 7 million or 8 
million more volunteers, none of whom will be paid for giving this type 
of service--at least these 7 million or 8 million. We do pay people a 
small stipend that is less than the minimum wage, less than the poverty 
level, but that extrapolates into as many as 7 million people, maybe 
even more--we hope more--who will actually volunteer at no cost to the 
Government and save trillions of dollars over the years.
  This is a conservative program in many respects and it is a liberal 
program in the sense that it helps so many people. Conservatives want 
to help all these people too. I guess the best thing to say is it is 
neither conservative nor liberal, although it has the best instincts of 
both sides who come together in the best interest of helping their 
fellow men, women, and children in this great country.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I am sure there are others who wish to speak 
on the Crapo amendment. However, either speaking on the Crapo amendment 
or the bill, we ask people to come over and talk on it. In the 
meantime, we would be willing to set this amendment aside. If there are 
other amendments the minority wishes to offer, we are certainly not 
going to stop them from doing that. I think we should get all the 
amendments we can on this legislation.
  So if there are other amendments people have, there is no stopping 
them from offering them.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. KAUFMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the order for the 
quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. KAUFMAN. Mr. President, I would like to begin by thanking my 
distinguished colleague, Senator Mikulski, for her effective leadership 
steering this bill through the HELP Committee while gaining bipartisan 
support.
  The strong support this bill enjoys is not surprising given her 
stewardship and, of course, the hard work of Senator Kennedy who 
brought us to this point.
  I would also like to thank Senators Hatch and Enzi for their work on 
this bill.

[[Page 8297]]

  When we work together across the aisle, the end result is a better 
bill and good governance.
  I can think of no bill that better represents the values of America 
than the Serve America Act.
  It will expand the opportunities for Americans to serve their 
communities and their Nation.
  It makes me--and I think all of us here proud that each year over 60 
million Americans volunteer, donating over 8 billion hours of their own 
time, their own lives--to make our country--and the world--a better 
place.
  We are in a time of crisis. Right now, our country needs those 
volunteers at our schools, hospitals, and shelters more than ever. 
Nonprofits are doing all that they can to help those who have lost 
their jobs, their houses, their savings, their retirement.
  This bill recognizes the need to reinforce and strengthen this system 
in a number of ways.
  I recently spoke here in the Senate about the need for our country to 
reset its focus on how best to change the culture of our economy away 
from a Wall Street profit-first mentality to one that prioritizes jobs 
and careers that will help our Nation tackle the challenges it 
currently faces.
  I believe that the vitality of our economy rests with our ability to 
be the world's leader in innovation, and I believe this means that we 
must do more to attract the best and the brightest to careers in 
science and engineering.
  Those who have dedicated themselves to these fields have much to 
contribute beyond making our economy competitive; they also contribute 
to our communities' well-being.
  This bill, I am proud to say, recognizes the important role that 
engineers can play in bettering our communities.
  I would like to commend the HELP Committee for expanding the purpose 
of the bill to include providing service opportunities for our Nation's 
retiring professionals, including those retiring from the science, 
technical, engineering, and mathematics professions--also known as 
``STEM'' jobs.
  Not only will this allow us to tap the unique skills and knowledge of 
our retired STEM workforce, but it will allow us to strengthen the STEM 
education pipeline.
  This bill will send retired engineers into communities, classrooms, 
and after school programs, allowing them to share their wisdom and 
experience with students.
  Ultimately, they will help these young people understand not only the 
important role that science and math can play in their careers, but how 
they can use their expertise in those fields to solve our country's--
and the world's--greatest challenges.
  This bill also acknowledges that innovative, community-based service- 
learning programs that integrate STEM are a successful strategy to 
engage middle- and high-school students in meaningful hands-on learning 
opportunities that also help them meet their community's needs.
  It specifically allows funds to be used to integrate service-learning 
programs into STEM curricula at the elementary, secondary, and 
postsecondary schools levels and then draw on practicing or retired 
STEM professionals to work in these programs.
  In this case, electrical engineers might participate in a program 
that helps students apply lessons from their math and science classes 
to expand and improve broadband access in rural communities.
  Linking the classroom to real-world applications will help students 
better understand the role and responsibilities of engineers and 
scientists in the workplace.
  The third way that this bill draws on the expertise and knowledge of 
engineers is that it allows ``Professional Corps'' programs to be 
created. These ``Professional Corps'' programs will recruit and place 
qualified professionals, like engineers, in communities that don't have 
an adequate supply of these professionals.
  For example, an employer would sponsor an individual and pay their 
salary to be placed in an organization that works with the community to 
conduct green energy audits of local public buildings or homes in 
disadvantaged communities.
  This would not only reduce a community's carbon footprint; it would 
also help improve public awareness of engineering's critical role in 
solving our Nation's greatest challenges--like energy efficiency and 
energy dependence.
  We must--once again--capture the attention of our students and let 
them see the numerous ways that STEM contribute to our economy and can 
improve the lives of their fellow citizens--in America and abroad.
  Just as I decided to study engineering because I was inspired by 
``Sputnik'' and the race to put a man on the Moon, we must inspire our 
students to work on issues of critical need as well.
  The underrepresentation of so many groups in STEM fields is 
troubling, since diversity is widely acknowledged to spur innovation 
and creativity.
  Innovation and creativity in turn spur the development of new 
products and new markets, which are essential to maintaining a 
competitive economy.
  Engineers and scientists can have a tremendous impact on the lives of 
these traditionally underrepresented groups by serving as mentors in 
their communities.
  This bill will encourage our Nation's scientists and engineers to 
work in and with economically disadvantaged communities to ensure that 
these fields include rather than exclude, and encourage rather than 
discourage, traditionally underrepresented groups from pursuing a STEM 
education.
  The Serve America Act will help our young people identify those 
challenges and provide them with real opportunities to make a 
difference--opportunities like improving energy efficiency, working 
toward energy independence for America, bolstering disaster 
preparedness and response, promoting environmental sustainability, 
strengthening our education and health care infrastructure, and 
improving opportunities for economically disadvantaged individuals.
  These challenges are daunting, yet I know that if asked, a new 
generation of engineers and scientists will rise to the occasion.
  I stand in proud support of the Serve America Act, as it will inspire 
multiple generations to volunteer and to engage in national service.
  Their generosity will not only strengthen America--but the world. I 
appreciate my colleagues' allowing me the opportunity to explain how 
the service opportunities this bill creates are also opportunities for 
our practicing and retired engineers to serve their fellow citizens--
ensuring that that our country's future STEM workforce is strong 
enough, diverse enough, and motivated enough to tackle the greatest 
challenges facing America.
  I will close by once again thanking Senators Mikulski, Kennedy, 
Hatch, and Enzi for their leadership.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor and note the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. DeMINT. I ask unanimous consent the order for the quorum call be 
rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Nelson of Nebraska). Without objection, it 
is so ordered.
  Mr. DeMINT. Mr. President, I wish to speak for few minutes on the 
Serve America Act. I think this is a great opportunity to talk about 
what is good about a lot of the Members of the Senate. I certainly 
appreciate and applaud the sponsors of this bill for their good 
intentions and know their hearts are in the right place. Some of my 
best friends are supporting this bill. But I think, as we look at what 
is good about the hearts of many Members of the Senate, we need to 
recognize this bill does represent a lot of what is wrong with our 
Federal Government today--a lot of our philosophies, and a lot of our 
departures from a constitutional form of government.
  What works in America today is our civil society--a lot of the 
volunteer groups that many of us have been a part of. I know for years 
I spent more time in United Way and a lot of the

[[Page 8298]]

charity groups, being on their boards back in my community, and I saw 
what the volunteer arts groups and PTAs and health groups did to build 
a strong community. Civil society works in America. They are small 
groups. They are the true engines of character in our country. They 
promote service and patriotism. In this time where we have seen some of 
our economic institutions let us down, we have certainly seen our 
Government and our policies let us down, civil society does not let us 
down. It works in America today.
  It is understandable why Congress would want to get involved. We see 
that passion to serve, that desire to do something that is greater than 
yourselves. We look at that working in our civil society and we want to 
get involved and expand it.
  Unfortunately, our history shows us when Government gets involved, it 
tends to take something that is working and make it not work nearly as 
well. Civil society works because it is everything Government is not. 
It is small, it is personal, it is responsive, it is accountable. Civil 
society must be protected from any effort to make it more like 
Government.
  That is what we are doing with this bill today. This bill centralizes 
control of important functions of our civil society. There is a 
downside to good intentions here in Government. The Founders created a 
limited government and our oath to support and defend the Constitution 
means that is our focus here. Our oath is to a limited government. The 
Founders wanted the people to be free from our good intentions. 
Government charity is anathema to what our Founders intended and what 
our Constitution stands for. Despite our good intentions, where we try 
to implement those good intentions and our compassion through the force 
of Government, we are effectively violating our oath of office here.
  Well-intended legislation has left more than half of all Americans 
dependent on the Government. Today in America over half of Americans 
get their income from the government or a government source. About 20 
percent of the country works for the government or an entity that gets 
its primary source of revenue from government. Another 20 percent gets 
their income and health care from Medicare or Social Security. Once you 
add in welfare and other subsidies, you make it so over half of all 
Americans are already dependent on the Government. This bill proposes 
to spend nearly $6 billion over 5 years, which means it will be 
probably $10 billion, probably more, over a 10-year period. It will 
have nearly a quarter of Americans working for it, which means it will 
be the 14th largest company, as far as employees, in the entire world.
  What have we done here that suggests we can manage anything like 
that? Do you see anything in our history as a Federal Government that 
shows we have the ability to effectively manage something like that 
without extreme levels of waste and fraud and abuse? Look what we have 
done recently with the stimulus plan and the bailout plans. As soon as 
it comes to light what is actually happening with that money, people 
are outraged at what is going on. Despite the good intentions of this 
bill, we are creating a huge new government entity that will be 
unmanageable and violates some of the core principles of our civil 
society. Every time the Government steps in to solve a problem, it 
creates three new problems in its place.
  This bill is everything wrong with how Congress sees the world. 
Government will make service organizations less effective, less 
responsive, and less personal. When the French historian de Tocqueville 
came to the United States not long after we were founded, one of the 
things that amazed him about our country that was so different from 
France was that in his home country when there was a problem, people 
would say: Someone ought to do it and government should do it; but in 
America we were different. When someone saw a problem, they went and 
got a friend and formed a small group and solved the problem 
themselves. Much of that was motivated by religious convictions that 
our place in this world is not only to help ourselves but to love and 
help those around us. That was key.
  Jefferson called it little democracies, when he saw these little 
groups all around America voluntarily doing things to solve problems 
and make communities better. Burke called them little platoons. Most 
people who understand America know that those voluntary groups are what 
made our country great and what sustain us even today. Civil society 
binds communities, not by its fruits, but by its motives--charity, 
donations, giving without thought of getting anything in return. This 
is the selfless sacrifice that happens throughout America today. This 
is what works.
  What does not work is what we are doing right here. The big 
difference is private service organizations exist for the people who 
receive the aid. Government service organizations exist for the people 
who give it--in this case, for the people who are paid to do it. You 
cannot pay people to volunteer and expect the organization to remain 
focused on its mission. Charity is a private, moral impulse, not a 
government program.
  Government will not and, by definition, cannot strengthen and replace 
the civil society. Volunteerism is something that works in America. 
When we think of America, we do not think of Congress and Presidents, 
we think of Little League games and PTA meetings and bake sales.
  Civil society is America. It responds to needs, meets challenges, and 
solves problems because it is free from Government. Because volunteers 
donate their time and money, accountability is acute. I have seen it. I 
have sat on a United Way board. Every year we evaluate every program 
and every dollar we have given to someone, and we determine is it 
working or can we make it more efficient.
  If the program is not working, the money goes away immediately. That 
does not happen here. If the program does not work here, we add more 
money to it. That is going to happen with every program we start, 
including the one we are talking about today.
  Projects that do not work in a civil society get cut. Organizers who 
lose or abuse funds are dismissed. It is voluntary. So everyone is 
invested in its success. We know the large groups throughout America, 
the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, the United Way, the Salvation Army, 
the YMCA, Catholic Charities, fraternal orders, groups such as Kiwanis, 
Rotary, Knights of Columbus. These are large organizations, but they 
work because they are locally controlled.
  Smaller groups, local arts councils and community theatres, PTAs, 
youth sports leagues, the animal rescues, the book clubs, crisis 
pregnancy centers, soup kitchens, food and other clothes drives that go 
on, church service groups, they are everywhere.
  Those are the little platoons, the little democracies that make this 
country work. For us to presume, in the Congress, that somehow we are 
going to reach out into all these groups and make it work better is 
pretty presumptuous based on our history.
  Why now? Why at a time in economic crisis with unimaginable debt and 
spending do we come in and say: We need to spend another $10 billion 
over the next 10 years to create another Government program to do 
something that is already working.
  At the same time, we are talking about creating this new bureaucracy 
to replace private voluntarism with Government programming. We are 
actually cutting some of the incentives for people to give to charity 
and for the private sector to work. The President's budget actually 
cuts the charitable donations of the people who give the most to 
charity in this country. So look at what we are doing. We are making it 
harder for the private sector to work.
  You also look at what we have done over the years, forgetting that a 
lot of private charity and the motivation to serve God and community is 
a religious-based motivation. What have we done in this country?
  We have essentially tried to purge that motivation from our country. 
Most public schools, or at least a lot of them, used to sponsor Boy 
Scout

[[Page 8299]]

groups. But after being sued for years because the Boy Scouts have God 
in their pledge and they set standards for their leaders that some do 
not agree with, the threat of lawsuits essentially means our Government 
schools have thrown out the Boy Scouts.
  More than half our astronauts, half our FBI agents, a lot of the most 
successful people in this country were trained in the Boy Scouts to 
serve their community, where their character was developed. But this 
Federal Government has forced them out of public places. For years we 
purged religion from our society. Religion was the primary motivation 
for a lot of civic groups, a lot of services, a lot of charities, a lot 
of hospitals that were formed, a lot of schools.
  But we have said that has no place. Because we have unleashed the 
ACLU and other groups to constantly sue and intimidate groups, that 
religious motivation has been moved, has been purged in many cases.
  Now we are going to come in and help solve the problem we have 
created. We want to promote voluntarism, we want to promote community 
service, when what we have done over the last several decades is 
essentially tried to destroy the motivation for people to serve a cause 
that is greater than themselves.
  We cannot replace private charity with Government programs. If we 
try, a lot of people are going to miss meals, suffer cold winters, and 
leaky roofs. I wish to go back to where I started. I appreciate the 
motivation, the heartfelt sense of compassion and the patriotism that I 
know my colleagues feel in sponsoring this legislation.
  But I think we need to come to a point as a government that we 
recognize we cannot do everything. That is why we take the oath to the 
Constitution to defend and protect the very limited form of Government. 
This Congress, this Government, does not need to start or expand an 
organization to a quarter million people, when we are paying people to 
do work that we decided needs to be done and take those decisions out 
of the hands of millions of Americans who look around every day and see 
what they can do to make their families, their communities, and their 
country a better place to live.
  These are not Government decisions. We need to focus on what we were 
set up to do and do it much better than we are doing, instead of every 
week coming in here, bringing our good intentions and our compassion 
and every problem we see across the country we say something needs to 
be done. Then we say: The Government needs to do it.
  That is the fatal flaw of the Congress today, is we forget that 
sacred oath of office that says: We will protect and defend the 
Constitution which says this Federal Government has a very limited 
function. And those functions that are not prescribed in the 
Constitution are left to individuals and to the States.
  This is a huge well-intended mistake we are making. It serves a point 
that we need to realize this Government needs to stop spending and stop 
borrowing, stop taxing, and let America work.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah is recognized.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, almost every group that the distinguished 
Senator from South Carolina has mentioned is helped by this bill, and 
every one of them wants this bill. This bill is basically run by the 
States. I agree with the Senator, they do it better than anybody else.
  As we close today's debate, I want to take this opportunity to focus 
on the economic case for national and community service, to articulate 
why the Serve America Act makes sense from an economic standpoint, and 
to highlight why the bill will generate a good return on investment 
right when the country and so many individuals need it most.
  In today's environment, every bill we consider must be viewed through 
an economic lens. What role does the legislation play in fueling our 
economic recovery? How can we cost-efficiently make Government a 
partner with the private and nonprofit sectors? How can we ensure we 
support efforts that are effective and shut down those that are not? 
What are the short- and long-term effects of what we do?
  Unfortunately, the economic recession has had a dramatic effect on 
our nonprofit sector and civil society. In the wake of the downturn, 
senior centers, soup kitchens, nursing homes, nursery schools, and 
other nonprofit organizations serving the vulnerable have seen a 
threefold crisis. As the markets have fallen, wealth has evaporated and 
decimated charitable donations. By the way, I do not agree with the 
President's recommendation to cut back on tax benefits to those who 
give to charity. The State and local budget crunch has hit the 
nonprofit sector especially hard. And the human need for help from 
community-serving institutions is skyrocketing right at a time when 
their resources are shrinking. One report called it America's ``Quiet 
Crisis.'' I believe that we here in the Senate should give this crisis 
more public attention and ensure that our civil society and our 
Nation's volunteers, which are the bedrock of efforts to meet needs in 
our country, remain strong. We need to help give more Americans 
opportunities to do good works in hard times.
  Research has uncovered disturbing evidence of civil society's growing 
troubles. Churches, which are typically our Nation's great engines of 
compassion, deliver social services to the poor and needy. Our country 
depends on faith-based institutions to meet needs that they are 
uniquely equipped to meet, far better than distant Government 
bureaucracies. Unfortunately, churches raised $3 to $5 billion less 
than anticipated in the last quarter of 2008, crippling efforts to keep 
pace with growing humanitarian needs. Other nonprofit budgets are 
shrinking. Chicago's Meals on Wheels, which delivers hot meals to 
homebound seniors, trimmed its budget by 35 percent; and half of all 
Michigan nonprofits say their financial support has dropped.
  Meals on Wheels is a Federal program. It would not exist without 
support from the Federal Government. It is handled very well at the 
local level.
  These trends are occurring just as need for help is rising. United 
Way call centers saw a 68-percent increase over the past year in the 
number of calls for basic needs, such as securing food, shelter, and 
warm clothing, and is receiving 10,000-15,000 more calls every month 
than in 2007.
  Lorna L. Koci, services director for the Utah Food Bank, recently 
visited my office to talk about increasing needs in my home State. The 
top three reasons people dial 2-1-1 in Utah to reach the United Way 
call center is for emergency food assistance followed by health care 
and housing needs. In the past 6 months, calls requesting food 
assistance have doubled and food pantry visits by Utah families are up 
at least 30 percent. Now you can imagine what that is in other States. 
Utah takes care of our people. My own church has a church welfare plan. 
No one in my faith should go without food, shelter or clothing. Most of 
the people served are the working poor, but many families are seeking 
assistance for the first time. These people were contributors and are 
now recipients. At alarming rates, needs are growing in Utah and across 
the Nation.
  Addressing this quiet crisis in our civil society is a matter of 
jobs, not just charity. The nonprofit sector accounts for 5 percent of 
GDP and 11 percent of the American workforce, with 9.4 million 
employees and 4.7 million volunteers nationwide. For perspective, the 
nonprofit sector is greater than the auto and financial industries 
combined. It contributes more than $322 billion in wages and its 
workforce outnumbers the combined workforces of the utility, wholesale 
trade, and construction industries. What happens to our nonprofit 
sector will have a big effect on our country, both from the standpoint 
of employment and meeting needs of the most vulnerable in our society.
  We have spent a lot of time on the floor of this Senate discussing 
ways to ``bailout'' industries and to get our economy moving again. I 
certainly have not agreed with the levels of spending, and I worry 
about the long-term effects of our actions on the Federal deficit and 
the national debt. I

[[Page 8300]]

don't think many of our actions have been wise, in the short term and 
certainly not for the long term. Thomas Jefferson warned of the moral 
problem of leaving a crippling debt to future generations. With the 
changing demographics in this country and the growth of entitlements, 
we are setting ourselves up for a fiscal crisis of tremendous 
significance.
  Yet the economic debate has almost completely ignored the platoons of 
civil society, those individuals, volunteers and nonprofit institutions 
in local neighborhoods and communities that do most of the social 
service work in our country to meet vital needs and do it at low cost 
to governments and society.
  There also has been so much talk of ``bailouts'' in our debates, 
let's just bail out this industry or that industry. We need to move 
from talk of bailouts to a spirit of challenge in our country. Where is 
the personal responsibility? Where is the support for efforts that 
truly enlist Americans in local communities to step forward to lend a 
hand? Our answers are not going to be found in the Federal Government. 
Our Government can offer resources, but it cannot love a needy child, 
offer the hand of compassion to help the elderly live independently in 
their homes with dignity, or help provide the deft human touch that 
gives hope in times of despair.
  So our debates on this floor should no longer exclude our nonprofit 
sector and civil society and the citizens who stand ready to help in 
times of trouble. No sector, quite frankly, offers more bang for the 
buck and generates a better return on investment than investments in 
our Nation's most precious asset--the talents and skills and enterprise 
of our people.
  Let's first talk about the important task of getting Americans into 
productive work. Community and national service efforts target two 
populations that have been hit particularly hard by the economic 
downturn--our Nation's young people, including college graduates, and 
older Americans. While unemployment rose for all age groups during 
2008, the increase was dramatic for America's young people. And we know 
from research that youth unemployment rates are a good barometer of the 
overall health of the economy, since young people typically face the 
greatest difficulties in finding steady employment, due to their lack 
of experience. By February 2008, the overall unemployment rate had 
reached 8.1 percent. The youth unemployment rate for individuals 16 to 
19 years old was nearly triple that at 21.6 percent. In particular, 
African-American youth were the most likely to be unemployed at a rate 
of more than 36 percent. Remember, during the Great Depression, we saw 
rates of unemployment for the adult population hovering around 25 
percent.
  High rates of youth unemployment are detrimental not only to jobless 
youth but to our economy as a whole. An individual who experiences 
early unemployment is more likely to have lower future earnings as well 
as repeated spells of joblessness. This is not the future we want for 
our young people. The demoralizing effects of long-term unemployment 
may lead to risky behaviors, such as crime and drug use.
  Unemployment rates for college graduates are increasing. In fact, the 
college graduate unemployment rate has broken the record for college 
graduates, and some researchers predict the rate, which is at 4.1 
percent, will exceed 5 percent in 2009.
  Our economic troubles are not just affecting the young. Many older 
Americans are quickly finding themselves out of work. In January 2009, 
5.2 percent of workers 55 and older were unemployed, an increase of 63 
percent from last year, with 1.5 million older workers now facing 
joblessness. In October 2008, one out of every three jobless Americans 
age 55 and older had been out of work for at least 27 weeks. A decline 
in the value of retirement funds--nearly $3 trillion from America's 
retirement accounts over the past 14 months, with the average American 
losing 34 percent on retirement holdings--has forced many older 
Americans to return to the job market.
  Investing in community and national service to put America--
particularly younger and older Americans--into productive work is a 
low-cost solution to fight unemployment and a vital bridge to 
permanent, higher paying employment in the private sector. Since the 
beginning of full-time and part-time national and community service in 
1993, an initiative that began with the Commission on National and 
Community Service under President George H.W. Bush, more than 540,000 
Americans have tackled the Nation's most challenging problems, not 
through Government, but through an extensive network of nonprofit 
organizations working at the local level. Well known nonprofits such as 
Habitat for Humanity that builds homes for low-income Americans, Teach 
for America, which sends bright teachers to the highest need 
communities, and City Year, which puts young Americans into productive 
work meeting needs in our Nation's cities.
  Every year since 2004, thanks to President George W. Bush's 
commitment to ramp up national and community service through his USA 
Freedom Corps after 9/11, our Government has offered 75,000 
opportunities to adults of all ages to serve not through some 
government bureaucracy, but through nonprofit organizations created by 
the innovation of our people. These public-spirited Americans who give 
a year of their lives in service to community and country are given a 
below-poverty monthly living stipend and receive a small award to help 
defray the costs of college at the end of their year of service.
  In addition to creating jobs at lower cost to Government or the 
private sector, national and community service programs and members 
leverage impressive resources within their communities. These 75,000 
national service participants leveraged 2.2 million traditional 
volunteers who receive nothing from government to work on behalf of 
meeting the needs of a nation. As I stated earlier, that is nearly a 1 
to 30 ratio of national servicemembers to traditional volunteers. In 
fact, this is the power of so many nonprofit partnerships today.
  It bothers me when I hear comments such as those recently made on the 
floor: We are forcing Government into everybody's lives. My gosh, we 
are providing a means of support for people--without making it the 
minimum wage or without giving them welfare--by helping them become 
servants and servers to the community at a lower cost. Millions are 
served without any pay at all because of these programs. How can 
anybody find fault with these programs?
  Imagine placing one national servicemember in a Habitat for Humanity 
build. That individual, who organizes the building project, recruits, 
trains and puts to work volunteers, dozens of them at no cost to 
Government, to ensure home after home rises to meet the needs of low-
income Americans. It is a great model. And it is not only about 
increasing the number of volunteers. In 2007, our national service 
programs leveraged an impressive $231 million in financial resources to 
meet local needs. It is a successful model of a public-private 
partnership, where the private participation in the form of resources 
and volunteers together outpaces the public.
  National service programs also have been shown to meet critical needs 
in communities. Independent evaluations have shown that teachers in 
Teach for America have made greater gains in math among their students 
compared to other teachers; participants in Citizen Schools show higher 
school attendance, a significant predictor of whether a student will 
stay on track to graduate from high school, and higher math and English 
grades; and third graders working with Experience Corps members scored 
higher in reading tests and exhibited better behavior in schools than 
children in control schools. African-American men in Youth Corps 
programs were more likely to have experienced more employment and 
higher earnings, to have voted in the last election, and scored higher 
on measures of personal and social responsibility than members in a 
control group. And 75 percent of former participants in the YouthBuild 
program, most of whom are high school

[[Page 8301]]

dropouts, had found gainful employment, were going to school, or were 
training for jobs. Research has also shown that participants in Youth 
Corps programs were more likely to secure better employment after 
completing their service and that former members, particularly African-
American and Hispanic males, had higher wages than their peers not in 
the program.
  These are the programs we are helping; programs that are doing all 
this work for free and making a difference in the lives of children and 
families. These are the programs that enlist seniors who would like to 
give back to the community. How can the argument be made that these 
programs should not be in effect?
  The economic benefits of traditional volunteering are also 
significant. In 2007, more than 60 million Americans--or more than 26 
percent of the adult population over 16--gave 8.1 billion hours of 
volunteer service. The cost of that service, had it been done by paid 
workers, would have amounted to approximately $158 billion. 
Volunteering in America rose significantly after 9/11, I believe thanks 
in no small measure to the leadership of President George W. Bush, who 
asked every American to give 2 years of service to the country over 
their lifetimes. Volunteering rose from 59.8 million Americans the year 
after 9/11, which was a very high baseline, given that we knew 
volunteering would rise in this year, to 65.4 million Americans from 
2004 to 2005. The story here is that America did respond to 9/11 and 
sustained the wave of service and patriotism for which the President 
and we in the Congress had hoped. The Mormon mission--which is often 
for a period of 2 years in service abroad or domestically--was one of 
the inspirations for the President's 2-year call to service. Almost 
every young Mormon male serves, as do many adults and females. They 
learn to care for people and give to communities. The spirit of service 
remains strong today at around 61 million volunteers within the last 
year.
  We clearly have room to grow the pool of volunteers and the 
ServiceNation coalition, consisting of more than 125 organizations from 
the AARP to Colin Powell's America's Promise Alliance for Youth, has 
endorsed this effort to increase our volunteer base from 61 million to 
100 million every year. According to a recent report by AARP, entitled 
``More to Give: Tapping the Talents of the Baby Boomer, Silent and 
Greatest Generations,'' a majority of older Americans are healthy and 
free of caregiving obligations, and tens of millions of them are 
prepared to increase their volunteer service in a world they believe 
they are leaving in worse condition than they inherited. This may be 
the first generation to believe this and they want to make it right. 
They have the capacity to do so. The 77 million baby boomers are the 
longest-living, best educated, healthiest, and most highly skilled 
generation in our history and represent enormous potential to meet 
significant needs throughout our country. We should be more creative in 
enabling more of them to serve.
  As the Nation's economy continues to sputter and organizations 
continue to operate on shrinking budgets, volunteers will become even 
more essential to the Nation's work. We need to do all we can to 
harness this productive capacity in these difficult times, and 
Americans seem very willing to shoulder more responsibilities to get 
the country moving again.
  The Serve America Act gives our country a hat trick--it puts 
Americans into productive work at low cost to Government, meeting the 
needs of the Nation, and with no new bureaucracy, since volunteers work 
through an established network of well-known and trusted nonprofit 
organizations created by the social enterprise of innovative people. 
The legislation also targets the two populations most in trouble from 
the economic downturn--our young people and older Americans. A new 
volunteer generation fund will tap, train and help deploy more 
traditional volunteers to meet needs identified by local communities. 
We saw the wellspring of American compassion in the aftermath of 
Hurricane Katrina. We need more of those efforts every day, not just in 
times of disaster.
  The bill also creates 175,000 more opportunities for full-time and 
part-time national and community service, mobilizing our people to 
tackle problems like the high school dropout epidemic and growing 
poverty. These 175,000 members, if current leverage ratios continue, 
would mobilize approximately 5.25 million traditional volunteers to 
help in these and other vital efforts. Together with the 75,000 who 
already leverage 2.2 million Americans, we could have around 8 million 
Americans participating every year in efforts to address specific 
challenges in education, healthcare, poverty, energy, and the 
environment. In hard times, we could use their good works.
  The Serve America Act also fosters a culture of service among younger 
and older Americans. Service-learning opportunities in our Nation's 
schools have been shown to boost student attendance and engagement, 
which in turn have a positive effect on keeping students on track to 
graduate from high school. On the other end of the spectrum, the bill 
also provides Encore Fellowships to older Americans who want to use 
their lifetime of skills and talents to help meet the country's needs. 
And national and community service programs will engage not just the 
young, but older Americans in their full-time and part-time efforts.
  Times of trial have always summoned the greatness of the American 
people. These are such times. Putting millions of Americans into 
productive work, not through the instrument of the government, but 
through the innovation of nonprofit and other community serving 
organizations, is a smart way to foster a spirit of challenge in the 
country and tap the innovation and expertise of our people. Government 
cannot stand on the sideline; it has an important role to play in 
partnering with the private and nonprofit sectors to further enable 
this innovation and release the energy of more Americans to give back 
in times of trouble. By putting hundreds of thousands of Americans to 
work in full-time and part-time national and community service; 
leveraging millions of additional volunteers to help meet urgent 
community needs; fostering innovation among the next generation of 
social entrepreneurs; and engaging nonprofit institutions in helping to 
meet challenges in key areas, we can help strengthen our economy and do 
something this country has always done well since its founding--release 
the energy of millions of Americans to do more good works in hard 
times.
  Mr. President, the distinguished Senator from Colorado is in the 
Chamber. I know he wishes to speak, so I will turn the time over to the 
distinguished Senator from Colorado.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Colorado.
  Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, will the Senator yield?
  Mr. UDALL of Colorado. Mr. President, I am happy to yield to the 
Senator from Oklahoma.
  Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, I have a unanimous consent request.
  I ask unanimous consent that at the conclusion of the remarks of the 
Senator from Colorado the Senator from Nebraska, Mr. Johanns, be 
recognized, then I be recognized, and then the Senator from Hawaii, Mr. 
Akaka, be recognized.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. UDALL of Colorado. Mr. President, I presided over the last hour 
and listened to the speeches about this important Serve America Act, 
and I felt compelled to rise and express my strong support for the 
legislation as well.
  I am a proud cosponsor of this legislation, and I want to 
particularly thank my colleagues--Senators Kennedy, Hatch, Mikulski, 
and Enzi--for working in a bipartisan manner to bring this important 
legislation to the Senate floor.
  During these challenging times, we forget that every day millions of 
volunteers give their time and energy to help others and to make their 
communities more livable. Thousands of recent college graduates help 
educate

[[Page 8302]]

young people in poor and rural schools through the Teach for America 
program. Millions of men and women join together to build affordable 
homes or improve health services for those in need throughout America 
through the AmeriCorps program. Tens of thousands of seniors are foster 
grandparents to our young people or companions to those who need help 
with everyday tasks through the Senior Corps program.
  These volunteers, as we have been hearing most of this afternoon, are 
the best of what our country has to offer and the very essence of the 
American spirit. By working together to pass this bill, we are doing 
honor to their commitment to civic engagement and public service.
  Service to community and country is something that has been an 
important part of my life. Prior to my career in politics, I served as 
the executive director of the Colorado Outward Bound School. Outward 
Bound provides participants with opportunities to test themselves--both 
physically and mentally--by confronting obstacles and surviving the 
elements. At the same time, the school teaches participants to rely on 
each other for support, assistance, and to work better as a team to 
meet all the challenges that Mother Nature can throw at you.
  As part of the Outward Bound program, we considered it important to 
promote volunteering because we believed it helped strengthen our 
communities.
  Voluntarism also enables young people to develop personal confidence 
and self-respect, to avoid the temptation to utilize violence to settle 
differences by instead learning skills and helping others.
  I also had the opportunity to work in the House of Representatives 
with my fellow House Member Tom Udall, where we introduced legislation 
to promote volunteer efforts on our public lands. The goal of our piece 
of legislation called the SERVE Act was to enhance the stewardship of 
the natural and cultural resources for the millions of people who visit 
them for recreation and education every year.
  We also worked together to give the Peace Corps the resources to 
expand their ranks. After more than 40 years, the Peace Corps remains 
one of the most admired and successful initiatives ever put in place. 
The Peace Corps offers an avenue to better understand other cultures 
and to do a better job of promoting an understanding of American values 
by citizens abroad.
  Many Coloradans have dedicated themselves to community and national 
service. For example, Colorado has one of the highest levels of 
recruitment of Peace Corps volunteers nationwide, including my mother, 
who served in the Peace Corps in Nepal from the age of 56 to 61.
  So we have a great volunteer spirit in this country, and we can do 
more to expand the opportunities for people who would like to give 
their time to help others in our communities. The bill before us today, 
the Serve America Act, does that by building on the very strong 
foundation built by AmeriCorps and other service programs.
  Let me discuss a couple of the important elements of this important 
piece of legislation.
  First, it establishes the Youth Engagement Zone to Strengthen 
Communities program and the Campus of Service program. By engaging high 
school students and out-of-school youth in community opportunities, we 
can instill a spirit of service in our young people that will stay with 
them for a lifetime.
  Secondly, the Campus of Service program recognizes colleges and 
universities with outstanding service-learning programs, and provides 
resources to support students who want to pursue careers in public 
service. So many adults who work in Government, nonprofits, and other 
public service careers got started because of opportunities they had 
when they were in school. This program will expand the options 
available to students, so more young people can find rewarding 
volunteer experiences, and so we can increase the number of young 
people who want to pursue careers in public service.
  Third, the bill creates a set of focused corps: the Education Corps, 
the Healthy Futures Corps, the Clean Energy Futures Corps, the Veterans 
Corps, and the Opportunity Corps.
  I wish to take a minute to address one, the Clean Energy Futures 
Corps. In this program, the participants would do a variety of jobs to 
help make our communities more energy efficient and to preserve our 
country's natural beauty. These volunteers might help weatherize low-
income households to help residents save money or to help clean and 
improve parks, trails, and rivers.
  I was fortunate I was born into a family with a long tradition of 
working to protect our country's majestic public lands so future 
generations could enjoy the spectacular scenery and outdoor recreation 
activities we appreciate today. So I am pleased that Senators Kennedy, 
Hatch, Mikulski, and Enzi included preserving our national treasures as 
a core principle of the Clean Energy Futures Corps.
  I am also very pleased the corps will encourage energy efficiency and 
weatherization efforts. Energy efficiency must play a key role in 
helping us use energy in a more responsible and sustainable way. If you 
think about it, the most affordable kilowatt of energy is the one that 
is not used. This is important, especially for families struggling to 
get by each week. Energy efficiency and weatherization efforts will 
help ensure these families do not have to choose between paying their 
heating bill and putting food on their table.
  Community service enriches everyone who participates--those who are 
being helped and those who are offering their service. Volunteers can 
change a neighbor's life or transform our entire country.
  I support the mission of this bill. I commend President Obama as the 
driving force in promoting service opportunities for Americans of all 
ages.
  Mr. President, as I conclude, I want to offer some additional remarks 
that amplify what my good friend from Utah, Senator Hatch, said in 
response to our good friend from South Carolina.
  The Senator from South Carolina came to the floor and expressed his 
concerns about this important legislation. He suggested that civil 
society is everything government is not. Well, with all due respect to 
my friend from South Carolina, I could not disagree more. I think civil 
society and government are not mutually exclusive. In fact, the 
Founders designed our formal democratic government systems based on 
what they learned in the civil society of the early days of our 
country.
  Lincoln--probably our greatest President, the founder of the 
Republican Party--if I can paraphrase him--said: What we cannot do 
alone, we do together in self-government to accomplish.
  There is an increasing demand clearly in our society that Senator 
Mikulski, Senator Kennedy, Senator Enzi, and Senator Hatch have heard 
and want to tap into. Senator Isakson was on the floor earlier talking 
about creating an infrastructure of volunteers that this bill would so 
importantly promote. He talked about that the corps' participants are 
only paid stipends and small, cover-your-expenses salaries. So this is 
not an expensive program for the benefits that are generated.
  The Senator from Utah talked about how this is the best of the 
liberal and conservative philosophies combined. The Senator from South 
Carolina talked about the great French historian de Tocqueville who 
identified this wonderful spirit in America of voluntarism way back in 
the 1820s and suggested somehow that could only be pursued through what 
he called the civil society. Well, that spirit is unique to America, I 
believe, and it is alive and well, and it can be promoted by civil 
society, by private society, as well as by this private-public 
partnership that is envisioned in this important legislation.
  In closing, I cannot help but think of my friend, a mentor, a leader, 
the Senator from Arizona, Mr. McCain, who, in expressing the lessons he 
had learned in his life, talked about why he joined the military. And 
he put it simply. He said in order to build his self-respect, he wanted 
to dedicate himself to a

[[Page 8303]]

cause greater than his own self-interest. That is what this important 
legislation will do, and it will allow millions of Americans to have 
that opportunity, to dedicate themselves to causes greater than their 
own self-interests.
  I urge swift passage so we can go to work.
  Mr. President, I thank you and yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Nebraska.


                 Amendment No. 693 To Amendment No. 687

  Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to send an 
amendment to the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       The Senator from Nebraska [Mr. Johanns] proposes an 
     amendment numbered 693 to amendment No. 687.

  Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the reading 
of the amendment be dispensed with.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The amendment is as follows:

 (Purpose: to ensure that organizations promoting competitive and non-
competitive sporting events involving individuals with disabilities may 
 receive direct and indirect assistance to carry out national service 
                               programs)

       On page 115, line 15, strike ``1 percent'' and insert ``2 
     percent''.
       On page 115, line 20, strike ``$10,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$20,000,000''.
       On page 213, after line 21, insert the following:

     SEC. 1613. AVAILABILITY OF ASSISTANCE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) Special Olympics is a nonprofit movement with the 
     mission to provide year-round sports training and athletic 
     competition in a variety of Olympic-type sports for children 
     and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them 
     continuing opportunities to develop physical fitness, 
     demonstrate courage, experience joy, and participate in a 
     sharing of gifts, skills, and friendship with their families, 
     other Special Olympics athletes and the community.
       (2) With sports at the core, Special Olympics is a leader 
     in the field of intellectual disability, and is making 
     impressive strides in the areas of health, education, family 
     support, research, and policy change for people with 
     intellectual disabilities.
       (b) Amendment.--Subtitle F of title I is further amended by 
     inserting after section 184 the following:

     ``SEC. 184A. AVAILABILITY OF ASSISTANCE.

       ``Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act relating 
     to eligibility, a reference in subtitle C, D, E, or H of 
     title I regarding an entity eligible to receive direct or 
     indirect assistance to carry out a national service program 
     shall include an organization promoting competitive and non-
     competitive sporting events involving individuals with 
     disabilities (including the Special Olympics), which promote 
     the quality of life for individuals with disabilities.''.

  Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, I rise today to speak about the need to 
support programs which help individuals with developmental disabilities 
such as Special Olympics. The care and treatment of people with 
developmental disabilities has always been a priority of mine. In fact, 
it is probably the major reason I am in public service today.
  When I was Governor of Nebraska, I made it a priority to reform a 
piece of the system delivery in our State. Many of these citizens had 
mental illness and developmental disabilities. One of my major 
achievements was signing a bill into law which increased the use of 
community-based services for these citizens.
  In Nebraska today, these citizens are much more likely to receive 
care at a specialized day treatment program or other local residential 
facility. This legislation was a victory for those Nebraskans and their 
loved ones who suffer from mental illness, giving them a chance to more 
fully participate in everyday life and to make a contribution to their 
communities.
  Our efforts to aid the most vulnerable among us, though, must be a 
national as well as a local goal. And Government is only a part of the 
solution. There are many impressive private organizations which assist 
people with disabilities, but perhaps none as impressive as the Special 
Olympics.
  Special Olympics is a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping 
this population become physically fit and productive by participating 
in sports training and competition. For over 40 years, Special Olympics 
has used sports to help bring people together and provide a venue for 
athletes with disabilities to compete with each other as equals.
  But as anyone who has been involved with Special Olympics can tell 
you, it is much more than just the competition. The camaraderie and the 
sense of accomplishment felt by these very special citizens and 
athletes gives them self-confidence in every aspect of their lives. 
This is critically important work.
  Special Olympics and similar organizations are vital to our 
fundamental national principles of human equality and our basic common 
dignity. It takes many volunteers to drive the success of an 
organization such as Special Olympics. In fact, when the National Games 
come to Nebraska next year, they are going to need 8,000 volunteers to 
serve 3,000 athletes, 15,000 family and friends, and 30,000 fans who 
will attend.
  I am very proud our home State is taking on the challenges associated 
with this sporting event. Special Olympics has raised $1.5 million in 
private local funding for the 2010 National Games, which should 
indicate the State's level of enthusiasm for the event. To encourage 
the American volunteer spirit and help Special Olympics reach its goal 
of 8,000 volunteers for the 2010 games, I am very pleased to introduce 
an amendment which would increase the funding authorization for service 
programs assisting people with disabilities. I can think of no more 
worthwhile endeavor.
  My amendment would double the amount of funding authorized under the 
National and Community Service Act that is set aside for such purposes 
and double the limit of such funding to $20 million. It must be the 
task of all of us to care for those most at risk. Helping people with 
developmental disabilities lead productive and fulfilling lives 
benefits our entire Nation and should thus be a national priority. I 
hope the Senate will agree with me on this and vote to pass my 
amendment.
  Thank you, and I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, first of all, I say to the Senator from 
Nebraska, I wish to thank him for his compassion. This side of the 
aisle, and I know the other cosponsors of the Serve America Act, are 
very much interested in working with him to accomplish the goal he so 
eloquently stated in his very compassionate statement. I would ask 
respectfully if we could--before I make a request--lay the amendment 
aside, and the staff on both sides of the aisle would like to work with 
the Senator to achieve these objectives. We want to be sure we don't 
inadvertently negatively impact either senior programs or some other 
programs for the disabled. Would the Senator be agreeable to that?
  Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, may I inquire as to whether the esteemed 
Senator from Maryland would be willing to guarantee a determination on 
the amendment so we get a resolution of the issue?
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Absolutely. The Senator will get a determination on his 
amendment. I give him my word. Is that agreeable?
  Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, that is agreeable. We will work together 
and make sure we are not displacing another program and work toward a 
determination.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Johanns 
amendment on the Special Olympics be temporarily laid aside.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is 
so ordered.
  The Senator from Oklahoma is recognized.
  Mr. INHOFE. I thank the Chair.
  (The remarks of Mr. Inhofe pertaining to the introduction of S. 680 
are printed in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced Bills 
and Joint Resolutions.'')
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Hawaii is recognized.
  Mr. AKAKA. Mr. President, it is my great honor and privilege to speak 
in support of the Serve America Act. I

[[Page 8304]]

want to thank my dear friend and colleague Senator Kennedy, as well as 
Senators Hatch, Mikulski, and Enzi, for their commitment and dedication 
to this legislation, which celebrates our national legacy of service 
and volunteerism--a legacy which has made this country great.
  In my home State of Hawaii, children are taught from an early age the 
importance of nurturing and strengthening bonds between people. Each 
member of an `Ohana--or extended family--is expected to make a 
contribution--no matter how great or small--and to use their unique 
talents to benefit the community. Through this legislation we can 
increase this same sense of community responsibility throughout the 
Nation.
  In my role as chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on the 
Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the 
District of Columbia, I have advocated for programs and policies that 
encourage talented young people to join the Federal workforce. As we 
work to increase opportunities for national and community service, it 
is worth emphasizing that Federal Government service is a valuable way 
to contribute.
  I am pleased that this bill includes language that encourages post-
secondary students to pursue careers in public service through the 
Campuses of Service program. By supporting efforts to develop and 
implement models of service-learning, the Campuses of Service programs 
will help us build a new generation of public servants in the Federal 
workforce. This will help us prevent a future leadership gap as more of 
our Nation's long-serving, dedicated Federal employees become 
retirement eligible.
  As chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee, I am supportive of the 
provision in this Serve America Act that creates a Veterans Corps. This 
program will help our nation's veterans--members of our Armed 
Services--and their families through the creation of community-based 
programs designed to address their unique needs. This is a great way to 
give back to the community: to assist the men and women who have 
bravely risked their lives in defense of our Nation, by providing 
comfort to their families while their loved ones are deployed, or by 
helping disabled veterans back home. I am also pleased that the 
Veterans Corps will encourage our veterans to become volunteers 
themselves. As former members of our military, these dedicated men and 
women have gained experience and skills that can be used to benefit our 
Nation through community service.
  In Hawaii, we have a saying, 'a'ohe hana nui ke alu 'ia, which means 
that no task is too big when done together by all. This bill helps 
create opportunities for all of us to work together now and to teach 
the value of collaboration to younger generations. Please join me in 
voting in favor of passage of the Serve America Act. mahalo--Thank you.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Montana is recognized.
  Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, in a few moments, I will ask that an 
amendment be pending. First, I will speak on the amendment.
  Mr. President, I rise today to offer an amendment that will 
strengthen small charities around our country, especially in places 
where resources are scarce.
  My amendment will create a ``Nonprofit Capacity Building Program.'' I 
am pleased to have worked with my colleague Senator Grassley to develop 
this program. I have worked with Senator Grassley for several years on 
oversight of tax-exempt organizations and efforts to strengthen the 
nonprofit sector.
  Our amendment will connect Government funds with private-sector funds 
to provide education and training to small and midsize charities.
  Small charities around our country serve people in need of food or 
clothing, run afterschool programs, provide housing counseling, and 
other services that are vital to our communities. But in many cases, 
these small charities lack access to education opportunities where they 
might learn how to manage the charity's finances, fundraise 
effectively, accurately file tax forms, adopt new computer programs or 
plan a long-term budget.
  In nonprofit circles, folks would say these small nonprofits lack 
``capacity,'' and training in these areas is called ``capacity-
building.''
  Our amendment will add $5 million per year over 5 years to the budget 
of the Corporation for National and Community Service to make matching 
grants to larger organizations so they will, in turn, provide training 
to small and midsize charities throughout their State or region.
  These kinds of training opportunities are especially rare for 
charities located in rural areas. Folks running a charity in a rural 
area may never have the chance to attend a grant-writing training or a 
class on nonprofit budget management.
  That is why our amendment states that nonprofit training 
opportunities should be targeted at charities in areas with these 
resource challenges.
  The amendment also requires the grants to be dollar-for-dollar 
matching grants. The match must come from non-Federal sources, such as 
private foundations or corporate giving programs. It is important that 
both the Federal Government and the private sector pitch in to provide 
this support.
  Government and private giving must coordinate better in support of 
people and communities. The underlying bill, the Serve America Act, 
supports the development of public-private solutions to problems facing 
our country. Some of my colleagues believe that the private sector must 
solve every problem facing our communities. Many others believe that 
Government is essential to solve the same problems. I believe that we 
need a combination of the best ideas from both. That is the spirit 
behind this amendment.
  I hear from folks in my home State of Montana on a weekly basis in 
support of this idea.
  The National Council of Nonprofits, Independent Sector, and the 
Alliance for Children and Families have voiced their strong support for 
this amendment.
  I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of the Baucus-Grassley 
nonprofit capacity building amendment.


                 Amendment No. 692 to Amendment No. 687

  Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the pending amendment be 
temporarily set aside so I may call up my amendment No. 692.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The clerk will report.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       The Senator from Montana [Mr. Baucus], for himself and Mr. 
     Grassley, proposes an amendment numbered 692 to amendment No. 
     687.

  Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that reading of 
the amendment be dispensed with.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The amendment is as follows:

     (Purpose: To establish a Nonprofit Capacity Building Program)

       On page 297, between lines 16 and 17, insert the following:

     SEC. __. NONPROFIT CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM.

       Subtitle H of title I (42 U.S.C. 12653 et seq.) is amended 
     by adding at the end the following:

             ``PART V--NONPROFIT CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM

     ``SEC. 198S. NONPROFIT CAPACITY BUILDING.

       ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) Intermediary nonprofit grantee.--The term 
     `intermediary nonprofit grantee' means an intermediary 
     nonprofit organization that receives a grant under subsection 
     (b).
       ``(2) Intermediary nonprofit organization.--The term 
     `intermediary nonprofit organization' means an experienced 
     and capable nonprofit entity with meaningful prior experience 
     in providing organizational development assistance, or 
     capacity building assistance, focused on small and midsize 
     nonprofit organizations.
       ``(3) Nonprofit.--The term `nonprofit', used with respect 
     to an entity or organization, means--
       ``(A) an entity or organization described in section 
     501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt 
     from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code; and
       ``(B) an entity or organization described in paragraph (1) 
     or (2) of section 170(c) of such Code.

[[Page 8305]]

       ``(4) State.--The term `State' means each of the several 
     States, and the District of Columbia.
       ``(b) Grants.--The Corporation shall establish a Nonprofit 
     Capacity Building Program to make grants to intermediary 
     nonprofit organizations to serve as intermediary nonprofit 
     grantees. The Corporation shall make the grants to enable the 
     intermediary nonprofit grantees to pay for the Federal share 
     of the cost of delivering organizational development 
     assistance, including training on best practices, financial 
     planning, grantwriting, and compliance with the applicable 
     tax laws, for small and midsize nonprofit organizations, 
     especially those nonprofit organizations facing resource 
     hardship challenges. Each of the grantees shall match the 
     grant funds by providing a non-Federal share as described in 
     subsection (f).
       ``(c) Amount.--To the extent practicable, the Corporation 
     shall make such a grant to an intermediary nonprofit 
     organization in each State, and shall make such grant in an 
     amount of not less than $200,000.
       ``(d) Application.--To be eligible to receive a grant under 
     this section, an intermediary nonprofit organization shall 
     submit an application to the Corporation at such time, in 
     such manner, and containing such information as the 
     Corporation may require. The intermediary nonprofit 
     organization shall submit in the application information 
     demonstrating that the organization has secured sufficient 
     resources to meet the requirements of subsection (f).
       ``(e) Preference and Considerations.--
       ``(1) Preference.--In making such grants, the Corporation 
     shall give preference to intermediary nonprofit organizations 
     seeking to become intermediary nonprofit grantees in areas 
     where nonprofit organizations face significant resource 
     hardship challenges.
       ``(2) Considerations.--In determining whether to make a 
     grant the Corporation shall consider--
       ``(A) the number of small and midsize nonprofit 
     organizations that will be served by the grant;
       ``(B) the degree to which the activities proposed to be 
     provided through the grant will assist a wide number of 
     nonprofit organizations within a State, relative to the 
     proposed amount of the grant; and
       ``(C) the quality of the organizational development 
     assistance to be delivered by the intermediary nonprofit 
     grantee, including the qualifications of its administrators 
     and representatives, and its record in providing services to 
     small and midsize nonprofit organizations.
       ``(f) Federal Share.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost as 
     referenced in subsection (b) shall be 50 percent.
       ``(2) Non-federal share.--
       ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost as 
     referenced in subsection (b) shall be 50 percent and shall be 
     provided in cash.
       ``(B) Third party contributions.--
       ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in clause (ii), an 
     intermediary nonprofit grantee shall provide the non-Federal 
     share of the cost through contributions from third parties. 
     The third parties may include charitable grantmaking entities 
     and grantmaking vehicles within existing organizations, 
     entities of corporate philanthropy, corporations, individual 
     donors, and regional, State, or local government agencies, or 
     other non-Federal sources.
       ``(ii) Exception.--If the intermediary nonprofit grantee is 
     a private foundation (as defined in section 509(a) of the 
     Internal Revenue Code of 1986), a donor advised fund (as 
     defined in section 4966(d)(2) of such Code), an organization 
     which is described in section 4966(d)(4)(A)(i) of such Code, 
     or an organization which is described in section 
     4966(d)(4)(B) of such Code, the grantee shall provide the 
     non-Federal share from within that grantee's own funds.
       ``(iii) Maintenance of effort, prior year third-party 
     funding levels.--For purposes of maintaining private sector 
     support levels for the activities specified by this program, 
     a non-Federal share that includes donations by third parties 
     shall be composed in a way that does not decrease prior 
     levels of funding from the same third parties granted to the 
     nonprofit intermediary grantee in the preceding year.
       ``(g) Reservation.--Of the amount authorized to provide 
     financial assistance under this subtitle, there shall be made 
     available to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of 
     fiscal years 2010 through 2014.''.

  Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, I hope Senators will support this at the 
appropriate time. Pending that moment, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland is recognized.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I compliment the Senator from Montana on 
his amendment. I understand his amendment is also a bipartisan 
amendment; is that correct?
  Mr. BAUCUS. Yes, that is correct.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Both he and the Senator from Iowa, Mr. Grassley, are 
cosponsors. I believe the Senator's amendment has identified a very 
specific need, particularly for the small, primarily rural 
organizations that sometimes are not looked at when we do a big 
national framework. I want to be as supportive as I can of the 
Senator's amendment. I want to examine it more closely. In order to 
follow the framework, I need to discuss it with my colleague, Senator 
Hatch, and also Senator Enzi of Wyoming. As many know, Senator Enzi has 
been trapped in a snowstorm. He will be here tomorrow. We will have a 
chance to review this and determine our ability to work with the 
Senator from Montana and the Senator from Iowa to see whether we can 
find some comity to adopt the amendment. I thank them for their spirit 
of bipartisanship. We will continue to follow that same framework.
  Mr. BAUCUS. I deeply thank the Senator from Maryland, who is a strong 
advocate for Serve America, a wonderful program. I think this will make 
it a little better. It is bipartisan, as she said. This helps more 
people. I thank the Senator.
  I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Ms. MIKULSKI. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. McCaskill). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________