[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 155 (2009), Part 19]
[Senate]
[Pages 25726-25727]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                    UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS

  Mr. REED. Mr. President, I again rise to urge my colleagues, 
particularly from the other side, to join us in passing an extension of 
unemployment insurance, to stop blocking a program that is so necessary 
to every person in this country, not just those who are losing jobs but 
those who are fearful their jobs might be taken away.
  This is a national issue, an emergency. It requires attention and 
action now, not weeks from now. For the last several weeks, we have 
been trying to get an agreement to proceed. Last week, Leader Reid 
justifiably filed the first of what could be three cloture motions that 
some on the other side would insist we must proceed through until we 
can enact this important effort and benefit for 15.1 million unemployed 
Americans.
  Everyone in Congress, regardless of party affiliation, is concerned 
about jobs. There is no unemployment crisis just in red States or in 
blue States or in purple States or any color States. This is a 
nationwide problem. It requires a nationwide solution, and one of the 
first steps is simply extending unemployment benefits for the people 
who are running out of these benefits or who may, in fact, lose their 
employment and need these benefits.
  We have to create jobs. That is the ultimate solution to the current 
economic crisis. We must have a sustainable and robust recovery. We are 
receiving some encouraging signs. It is estimated that when the gross 
domestic product for this quarter is reported, it will be about 3 
percent, the first time GDP since the second quarter of 2008. But 
positive GDP is not the answer for people who are looking for work 
unsuccessfully. They need the benefits of extended unemployment 
compensation.
  This legislation is very straightforward. It ensures that out-of-work 
Americans can provide for their families, can stay in their homes, and 
can maintain a sense of dignity while they continue to search for 
employment in a very difficult market.
  Not only is it simply the right thing to do because it demonstrates 
some degree of recognition of the extraordinarily difficult situation 
facing so many in this Nation, but unemployment compensation insurance 
helps to aid the economy. You don't have to be an economist to 
understand that getting money to people who will spend it quickly on 
basic necessities spurs demand and helps prevent further erosion of the 
economy. Yet my colleagues on the Republican side continue to ignore 
the urgency of the situation.
  As stated, last week the distinguished majority leader had to file a 
cloture motion to proceed to the House-passed unemployment insurance 
extension. This is unprecedented.
  Congress has acted eight times--in 1958, 1961, 1971, 1974, 1982, 
1991, 2002, and 2008--to establish temporary programs that provided 
additional weeks of unemployment compensation benefits beyond regular 
unemployment compensation and any extended benefits.
  Let's take a moment to look back at the recent unemployment insurance 
extensions under both Democratic and Republican administrations.
  President George Herbert Walker Bush signed an unemployment insurance 
bill into law that passed the Senate with near unanimous support. Not 
once, but twice--in November 1991 and February 1992, when the 
unemployment rate was 7 percent and 7.4 percent, respectively. And we 
are at a much more serious moment in our economic history today than 
those years ago.
  In July 1992, President Clinton signed an unemployment insurance bill 
into law that passed with unanimous support in the Senate. The 
unemployment rate was 7.7 percent.
  In March and November 1993, President Clinton signed two more bills 
into law that passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. The 
unemployment rate was 7 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively.
  In the 1980s, President Reagan signed an unemployment insurance bill 
into law that unanimously passed a majority Republican Senate. The 
unemployment rate was 8.8 percent. Months earlier, it was double 
digits.
  These past votes, under Republican and Democratic Presidents and 
majorities of both parties in the Senate, demonstrate the nonpartisan 
nature of extending unemployment insurance when the economy is weak and 
unemployment is high. It is that simple.
  In fact, further reinforcing this notion is that the national 
unemployment rate has now risen to 9.8 percent and may not stabilize 
until next summer--much higher than the preceding incidents in which, 
on a bipartisan basis, under Republican and Democratic Presidents, we 
moved expeditiously to extend unemployment benefits.
  Nearly 2 million Americans will exhaust their benefits by the end of 
the year, but as I speak on the Senate floor, hundreds of thousands of 
Americans have already exhausted their benefits.
  Mr. President, 3,800 Rhode Islanders will benefit immediately from a 
Federal extension, a majority of whom have already exhausted their 
benefits going back, in some cases, several months. Hundreds more in my 
State exhaust their benefits each passing week.
  So why are the Republicans sidetracking this legislation? Let's take 
a look at the list of amendments.
  We all, as Senators, have a right to propose amendments, but when 
they are proposed simply to delay and not to constructively advance an 
issue, we have to look very skeptically at the amendments. There is an 
amendment concerning ACORN on which we have already voted. This seems 
to be just an attempt to delay not an attempt to responsibly legislate.
  It is my understanding that Majority Leader Reid has made many offers 
to the other side of the aisle so that the Senate can proceed to the 
immediate consideration of this critical legislation. It is 
disappointing these offers have been rejected.
  This bill is about stabilizing our economy. It is about helping 
Americans who, through no fault of their own, cannot find work. It is 
about this body, the Senate, taking action on behalf of people.
  I urge immediate consideration of this extension. I hope we can pass 
it tonight rather than be forced to another series of pointless and 
political cloture motions.
  I want to briefly mention another proposal related to this issue that 
is important to consider which would help in this terrible crisis of 
unemployment.
  I have introduced the Keep Americans Working Act to strengthen and

[[Page 25727]]

expand work share programs. These are programs in which 16 States, at 
the moment, pay a portion of unemployment benefits if the employer 
keeps the person on the payroll but reduces their hours to reduce costs 
and continues to pay their benefits--their pension and health care.
  So far this year, approximately 137,000 layoffs have been averted in 
States that have this program. We have a breakdown of the 16 States. In 
2008, 58,000 Americans were taking advantage of the work share program. 
They would work for 3 days a week, for example, and they would be off 2 
days. They would receive unemployment compensation pro rata for those 2 
days. The employer would keep benefits flowing, in terms of health 
care. They would have valuable workers not sent away from the firm but 
still engaged in productive activities.
  I visited a firm in Rhode Island that has this program. It is wildly 
popular with not only the workers but also with the managers. In Rhode 
Island, we have jumped from 2,800 last year to 5,400 this year, and it 
is rising.
  When I was at this plant, one of the workers said: This is the only 
way I can keep paying for my mortgage; this is the only way I can keep 
paying for the food we put on the table for our children. And the plant 
manager said: This is the only way I can keep a valuable worker so I 
can keep producing. I think it is a program that deserves close 
attention. This program in Rhode Island has helped many people avoid 
being completely laid off, and it has also helped the drain on the 
unemployment compensation fund because paying a pro rata share is a 
much better deal for the fund than paying the full benefits when 
someone is laid off completely.
  There are 16 States, as indicated here. They rank from Arizona, 
California, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, 
Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, 
Vermont, and Washington. Again, this program is not a one-State, one-
region, one-area program. This is a national program which I hope can 
be emulated by the other States. It is a win-win, and I hope we can 
move forward and take up this legislation as a complement to what we 
are proposing in the extension of unemployment benefits.
  The real key, though, ultimately is to get the jobs flowing again, 
and that is something we have to work on. That is something on which we 
have made some progress but not sufficient progress. We can't rest 
until there is confidence again that throughout this land people have a 
job, they feel confident they can keep it, they can provide for their 
families, and they can contribute to this great Nation.
  I yield the floor.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Illinois.

                          ____________________