[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 155 (2009), Part 11]
[Senate]
[Pages 14756-14759]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




            TRAVEL PROMOTION ACT OF 2009--MOTION TO PROCEED


                             Cloture Motion

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I move to proceed to Calendar No. 71, S. 
1023, the Travel Promotion Act of 2009, and I send a cloture motion to 
the desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under 
rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

                             Cloture Motion

       We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the 
     provisions of rule XXII of the Standing rules of the Senate, 
     hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to 
     proceed to Calendar No. 71, S. 1023, the Travel Promotion Act 
     of 2009.
         Byron L. Dorgan, Tom Udall, Patrick J. Leahy, Barbara 
           Boxer, Kay R. Hagan, Kirsten E. Gillibrand, Robert P. 
           Casey, Jr., Roland W. Burris, Benjamin L. Cardin, Bill 
           Nelson, John D. Rockefeller, IV, Daniel K. Inouye, 
           Blanche L. Lincoln, Ron Wyden, Bernard Sanders, Sheldon 
           Whitehouse, Ben Nelson.

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I now ask unanimous consent that on Tuesday, 
June 16, following a period of morning business, the Senate resume 
consideration of the motion to proceed to S. 1023 and there be 1 hour 
of debate prior to a vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the motion 
to proceed, with the time equally divided and controlled between the 
leaders or their designees; that upon the use or yielding back of that 
time, the Senate proceed to a vote on the motion to invoke cloture on 
the motion to proceed, with the mandatory quorum waived.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The Senator from North Dakota.
  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, the legislation described by my colleague, 
the Travel Promotion Act, is legislation I wish to discuss. The Travel 
Promotion Act is a bipartisan piece of legislation I have introduced 
with Senators Ensign, Inouye, Martinez, Klobuchar, Reid, and many 
others. I believe in the last session of Congress, when we introduced 
this, we had over 50 cosponsors. Let me describe what its purpose is.
  Who can be against travel promotion? Here is what has happened to our 
country with respect to the jobs and economic growth that comes with a 
decline in foreigners traveling to the United States. Measures put in 
place quickly after the 2001 attack on 9/11 had a significant impact on 
travel to the United States by foreign travelers.
  We, obviously, wanted to be careful about whom we allowed into our 
country. We still do. But what happened following that is, instead of 
reaching out to the world to say: Visit the United

[[Page 14757]]

States, this is a great place, we encourage you to come here, to 
vacation here, to see what the United States is all about, we backed 
away from that. Other countries have not. Here is what we have 
experienced. I have a chart here showing overseas travel between 2000 
and 2008.
  Since 2000 and 2008, there has been a 3-percent decrease in foreign 
visitors to the United States. At the same time, there has been a 40-
percent increase in visitors to other countries around the world. Think 
of the consequences of that to our economy. A foreign visitor, overseas 
visitor, coming to our country spends on average $4,500 per visit--that 
is a lot of economic activity, a lot of economic growth and jobs. But 
inbound travel has decreased in our country and substantially increased 
in others. Why is that the case?
  The rest of the world is very anxious to attract destination visitors 
to their country, international travelers, to say: We want you to come 
to our country as a destination for your trip. Take India--one special 
reason to visit India is this advertisement saying:

       ``Incredible India, any time is a good time to visit the 
     land of Taj, but there is no time like now.''

  Not unusual to see this. It is not only India.

       Australia's says: ``Arrived looking for an experience to 
     remember. Departed with adventure we will never forget. 
     Australia, come to Australia.'' If you are an overseas 
     traveler, deciding where to visit, be sure and come to 
     Australia.
       Ireland says: ``Go where Ireland takes you.''

  Pretty straightforward--makes you want to go to Ireland. Great 
Britain, Italy, Spain, France, Australia, India, Ireland, they say: 
Come to our country. Travel to our country. See what our country is 
about.
  We are not doing that.
  As a result, in the last 8 years, we have seen a 3-percent decrease 
in travel by foreign visitors to the United States, while the rest of 
the world has had a 40-percent increase in travelers destined to those 
other areas. It makes a big difference. It is very negative in terms of 
our country's economic opportunity that comes from travel and tourism.
  I showed the examples of what other countries are saying in their 
very explicit campaigns around the world, to say to people: If you are 
traveling abroad, if you are planning a vacation, a trip, come to our 
country. Come and see Italy, Great Britain, Ireland, India.
  Let me show you what is happening with respect to our country. 
Headlines such as these: The Sydney Sunday Morning Herald: ``Coming to 
America Isn't Easy.'' From The Guardian: ``America: More Hassle Than 
It's Worth?'' From The Sunday Times in London: ``Travel to America? No 
Thanks.''
  There is a perception that it is difficult to come to our country, 
hard to get a visa, and tourists will experience long waiting lines. 
Many of these problems have been corrected or improved. In the 
construction of this legislation, we address the need to better 
communicate our entry and exit procedures and their improvements. We 
don't want these negative headlines to be the message to the rest of 
the world--in fact, quite the opposite.
  What a large group of us in the Congress want is for our country to 
be engaged internationally, to say to people around the world: Come to 
our country. To see the United States is to understand the wonder of 
this great country. Come here. Stay here. Vacation here. Understand 
what America is about.
  I can't think of anything better, in terms of our position in the 
world and how people think of this great country, than to invite them 
and encourage them to come here. That is why we have introduced this 
bipartisan piece of legislation called the Travel Promotion Act of 
2009.
  Interestingly enough, the Congressional Budget Office has said this 
piece of legislation will reduce the Federal budget deficit by $425 
million between 2010 and 2019. We don't bring many pieces of 
legislation to the floor of the Senate in which the Congressional 
Budget Office says:
  This will make money. This is a net positive. This will reduce the 
Federal budget deficit. That is what this bill is about.
  Let me explain, for a moment, what we are trying to do with the 
legislation. The Travel Promotion Act will attempt to create 
international travel opportunities for people from all around the world 
to come to this country. It will set up a nationally coordinated travel 
promotion campaign run in a public-private partnership to communicate 
to the world our country's travel policies and, more importantly, 
communicate to the world: We want you here. We want you to explore what 
this great country has to offer. This public-private partnership is an 
ideal method for us to improve any negative perceptions out there, 
particularly as we work on visas and any remaining delays in entry 
procedures which we have corrected, in large part. This combines public 
sector accountability with private sector enterprise.
  This bill establishes a Corporation for Travel Promotion, an 
independent, nonprofit corporation, with an 11-member board of 
directors appointed by the Secretary of Commerce. It creates an Office 
of Travel Promotion in the Department of Commerce to work with that 
nonprofit corporation. It sets up a travel promotion fund, financed by 
a public-private matching program. Federal contributions will be 
financed by a $10 fee paid by foreign travelers from visa waiver 
countries and collected in what is called the Electronic System for 
Travel Authorization.
  Many other countries impose fees for people coming and going: 
Australia, $37 departure fee, an entry fee of $19 to $70; Mexico, an 
$11 departure fee, up to $38; New Zealand, $16 to $19 on the departure 
fee; United Kingdom, $80 to $160. There are a lot of fees around for 
people traveling internationally. We propose to fund this with a very 
modest fee of $10.
  This is very simple. It should be noncontroversial. There are many of 
us who have worked on this and worked very hard.
  My colleague from Minnesota is here, Senator Klobuchar, who has 
worked with us on this legislation. This is a piece of legislation 
Senator Reid has worked on. Senator Ensign is the lead Republican 
cosponsor. Other cosponsors include Senator Martinez and Senator Nelson 
of Florida. We have cosponsors across the political spectrum because 
this issue of asking people from around the world to come to America is 
not controversial and benefits every State. It cannot possibly be 
partisan, and it certainly is job creating.
  Now here is what some newspapers around the country have said about 
the legislation.
  The Sacramento Bee:

       This country needs to reclaim its status as a global magnet 
     for visitors . . . and Congress can help by passing the 
     Travel Promotion Act.

  The Los Angeles Times:

       Considering that the U.S. spends hundreds of millions of 
     dollars on public diplomacy with dubious results and nearly 
     nothing on promoting tourism, we might do well to invest a 
     little money in wooing travelers.

  The Detroit Free Press:

       Doesn't it make sense to encourage--at no cost to 
     taxpayers--foreign visitors to come here and leave us some 
     money? There's no good reason not to pass this bill.

  The Dallas Morning News:

       The Travel Promotion Act is a sensible first step toward 
     putting the welcome mat back on America's doorstep.

  And the list goes on.
  I do not come from Hawaii or Florida or California, I come from the 
northern Great Plains. And we have a lot of tourist destinations: the 
Badlands in North Dakota, some of the most beautiful areas in our 
country. Tourism is North Dakota's second largest industry. There are 
so many destinations with such wonder to attract people to our region 
of the country.
  It is where Lewis and Clark, in their epic adventure, decided to 
spend the winter in area about 40 miles north of Bismarck, ND. We 
celebrated the 200th anniversary, the bicentennial, of the Lewis and 
Clark Expedition, and we had a lot of people come from around the world 
to see that.
  The fact is, every State in this country has something it is anxious 
to show

[[Page 14758]]

the world, to say: Look at us. Look at what we are doing here. Look how 
beautiful this part of America is.
  So what has happened is, we have been unilaterally disarmed since 9/
11, to say: Well, we are worried about who is going to come into this 
country. We certainly want to keep terrorists out. We sure do, 
absolutely. But that message ought not be mixed with a message that we 
do not want to encourage foreign travelers to come to this country to 
vacation and to experience America.
  So at long last a group of us, Republicans and Democrats, have said: 
If we disagree on so much, how about if we agree on tourism? Can we 
agree on promoting travel? To say to the English, the Italians, the 
Spaniards, the French, the folks from India and Thailand and China and 
elsewhere: You are welcome in this country. We want you to come to this 
country. We want you to see what our country is about?
  To experience this country is to have a sense of wonder about the 
greatest democracy, the most significant and longest surviving 
democracy on Earth. We want them to go home with that understanding of 
what a great country this is. That is what we want.
  By the way, we do not believe our nearest neighbors--Mexico and 
Canada--are irrelevant. We have a lot of people coming from Mexico and 
Canada, and God bless them. They are great neighbors. We welcome them. 
We are told they spend, on average, about $900 per trip.
  The foreign travelers from overseas, by contrast, spend about $4,500 
per trip. That is why this is such an unbelievable job generator. 
People who come here and spend significant money and purchase the hotel 
rooms and the rental cars and go to the tourist attractions and do the 
things people who want to experience America routinely do not only 
create a lot of jobs and boost economic activity, but their travel also 
gives us the opportunity to show the rest of the world this is an 
extraordinary place where they can go home and tell their neighbors 
they just went to one of the greatest places on Earth.
  So as to the Travel Promotion Act of 2009, my hope is--after having 
battled here on so many different issues, and having cloture votes on 
everything, and then 30 hours post-cloture while we all stand around 
with our hands in our pockets and shuffling our shoes--my hope is, 
perhaps this is the issue, this is the one time, this is the occasion 
where everybody might say: Do you know something. There is something we 
can agree on that is noncontroversial, that makes sense. It creates 
jobs, it expands the economy, and represents the best of sending 
American values abroad; and that is, the Travel Promotion Act.
  If, perhaps, next week we get to that point, I think the American 
people will have believed we have done something good. So I am pleased 
to be the lead sponsor. We introduced this in the last Congress and did 
not get it passed. In this Congress I believe we will.
  I give my commendation to the majority leader and thank him for 
putting this on the agenda. I give my thanks to Senator Ensign as the 
lead cosponsor on the Republican side. But so many Republicans and 
Democrats have said: Yes, this makes sense. Count us in. We want to be 
part of expanding this economy and creating jobs and giving an 
opportunity for the people in the rest of the world to understand we 
welcome them here.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Minnesota.
  Ms. KLOBUCHAR. Mr. President, I am here today to speak in support of 
the Travel Promotion Act, which is bipartisan legislation. I first want 
to thank Mr. Dorgan, the Senator from North Dakota. I have visited the 
Teddy Roosevelt Park, and I want to thank him for his great leadership 
on this bill over many years. I also want to thank Senator Ensign for 
his leadership. I believe this legislation will help our economy to do 
better, to create jobs without any taxpayer expense.
  As the chair of the Commerce Subcommittee that includes tourism, I 
recently held a hearing--a well-attended hearing--with many Senators 
and people there to examine the state of our tourism industry during 
these troubled economic times. I want to thank my ranking Republican 
member, Senator Martinez. We did it together. I also held a field 
hearing in Duluth, MN, to highlight the importance of tourism to 
midsize and smaller towns in the United States.
  During the hearings, we heard about the importance of tourism and 
travel to our economy and the urgent need to increase international 
travel to the United States.
  As the Presiding Officer, Senator Udall, knows, coming from Colorado, 
America has so much to offer our travelers: whether it is the mountains 
of Colorado or--Senator Kaufman is here--the beaches of Delaware or the 
stunning national landmarks, such as the Grand Canyon, Mount Rushmore, 
and the Statue of Liberty or the oceans, lakes, and rivers or our 
mountains, forests, and beaches or our scenic country towns or the 
bright lights of the big cities or centers of fun and entertainment 
such as Las Vegas or Disney World or Duluth.
  From the heartland to the coasts, every State has an economic stake 
in the tourism industry, which is now a major part of the American 
economy. Throughout the United States, many communities have discovered 
and developed the economic potential of travel and tourism.
  I keep using the example of Duluth because at some point in the 
1970s, the economy was so bad there they actually had a billboard, so 
when you drove out of town, it said: The last one to leave, please turn 
off the lights.
  Well, that billboard is not there anymore, as tourism is the biggest 
part of their economy, on beautiful Lake Superior, with beautiful 
museums and an aquarium and a children's museum. It has changed the 
life of that town. Tourism creates good jobs that cannot be outsourced.
  Mr. President, one out of every eight Americans is employed in our 
travel economy. Each year, travel and tourism contribute approximately 
$1.3 trillion to the American economy. International visitors, as 
Senator Dorgan just noted, spend an average of $4,500 per person.
  In economic terms, international tourism to the United States counts 
as an export. Instead of shipping our product to a customer overseas, 
the customer is coming here to spend money on our goods and our 
services.
  Last year, travel and tourism exports accounted for 8 percent of all 
U.S. exports and 26 percent of all U.S. services exports. In fact, 
tourism is one of the few economic sectors where we enjoy a substantial 
trade surplus.
  Travel is a part of the fabric of our State and our country. But over 
the past decade, we know it has been stretched to the brink. While more 
people around the world are traveling, a smaller percentage of them are 
visiting the United States.
  This is not just about our troubled economy right now. This was going 
on long before that. It actually started after 9/11, where, for good 
reasons, security measures were put in place. But some of those good 
reasons have turned into very difficult times for tourists to come to 
this country, and that needs to be fixed. That is part of this bill: to 
make it easier for tourists to visit our country.
  Since 2000, the U.S. share of the world travel market has decreased 
by nearly 20 percent, costing us hundreds of thousands of jobs and 
billions of dollars in revenue.
  Last year, nearly 200,000 travel-related jobs were lost. The Commerce 
Department predicts we will lose another 247,000 jobs this year. 
Remember, this is not about airport CEOs. This is about the janitors 
who work at the airports. This is about the maids who are doing the 
beds. This is about the waitresses who are working at the restaurants. 
This is about the people who do the flowers for the hotels and for the 
banquets and for the business travelers. These are real jobs in 
America.
  This has always been a country that has opened its arms to people 
from around the world. That is why we are so great. We have to bring 
that back. We have to bring people in to visit this country.
  The Travel Promotion Act will do just that. By boosting travel to the

[[Page 14759]]

United States it will also give a boost to our economy. So it is a win-
win for the tourism industry, for jobs for America, and for the 
American people.
  Senator Dorgan went through the bill. I do want to emphasize that not 
only will this consist of travel promotion and promoting our country, 
like other countries have been doing for years that have been 
leapfrogging us in this market, additionally, this legislation will 
establish the Office of Travel Promotion in the Department of Commerce 
to work with the Corporation for Travel Promotion and the Secretaries 
of State and Homeland Security to encourage travel and to make sure 
international visitors are processed efficiently.
  It does not cost taxpayers a cent, as Senator Dorgan pointed out, and 
economists expect it to generate billions for our economy.
  According to an analysis by Oxford Economics, this tourism program is 
estimated to attract 1.6 million new international visitors annually 
and create $4 billion in new spending in our country, creating 40,000 
new jobs.
  We know we need to bring back business travel. We should not let a 
few bad actors influence the decisions of good companies around this 
country. We know we have to look, this summer, for affordable deals for 
our families, and people are staying close to home. We want our 
Minnesotans to go fishing in Minnesota.
  I say to the Presiding Officer, I would love to ask you if you know 
how much money people spend alone in Minnesota on bait and worms every 
year. I will tell you the answer. It has probably never been uttered 
before in this Chamber: $50 million a year. Minnesotans and visitors to 
our State spend $50 million a year on bait and worms for recreational 
fishing--just to give you an idea of what we are talking about when we 
talk about tourism spending.
  I strongly urge my colleagues to support this important piece of 
legislation. I am proud to be a cosponsor. I look forward to working on 
this bill on the floor in the days to come.

                          ____________________