[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 154 (2008), Part 6]
[Senate]
[Pages 7991-7992]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                         FLOOD INSURANCE REFORM

  Mr. DODD. Mr. President, before reading the concluding comments here, 
I wish to take a minute or so to summarize what happened today 
regarding the flood insurance bill.
  I express my gratitude, first of all, to Senator Reid, the majority 
leader, for insisting that this flood insurance matter come before the 
Senate. This is an important bill. There are a lot of issues that our 
constituents are facing,--the housing issue, on which I am spending a 
great deal of time, the economic issues generally, the price of 
gasoline, and the price of oil at $120 a barrel, causing staggering 
problems across our country. The flood insurance issue, as we enter 
hurricane season coming up, could make a great deal of difference for 
people in this country who are concerned about that issue and what 
could happen with the cost of premiums, whether they are going to have 
that coverage at all.
  Senator Shelby of Alabama, my ranking member and former chairman of 
the committee, along with Senator Bunning and others actually passed 
this legislation in a previous Congress and weren't able to get it 
adopted. We adopted it again out of the Banking Committee earlier this 
year, and I am optimistic that we will be able to bring final closure 
to this issue.
  In light of the fact that there is a tremendous amount of debt, 
FEMA--the Federal Emergency Management Agency--had to borrow $17 
billion from the Federal Treasury to meet the claims of people who 
faced the devastating loss as a result of the flooding that occurred 
with the major natural disasters. Borrowing that money had an interest 
payment due on it, and that cost alone was raising the cost of 
premiums. This bill, which I hope we complete tomorrow, will forgive 
that debt. That will remove that cost that is added to the premiums, 
which are not inexpensive but absolutely necessary if you are going to 
have a flood insurance program.
  I point out that the program generates about $2.5 billion worth of 
revenues each year with the premiums collected. About a billion dollars 
of that is administrative costs.
  When you have demands, as we did out of 2005 of $17 billion just in 
the flood insurance area, you get some idea of how expensive this 
program can be if it is not well managed and actuarially sound. So we 
have made this significant effort, which I think will be valuable to 
people across the country and make a difference.
  We still have major work to do on the housing issue. I would be 
remiss if I didn't say how disappointed I was earlier today to listen 
to the President of the United States standing with the Republican 
leadership of the House of Representatives, announcing that he intended 
to veto the housing legislation. Congressman Franks and his Republican 
counterparts are working on it in the House, and we are working on it 
in the Banking Committee. We are nowhere near having a bill per se, so 
I was shocked to hear the President saying he was vetoing something 
that doesn't exist yet. We are making an effort to have a bipartisan 
bill. I would have hoped he would say: I am watching what you are doing 
and I am interested, and I have ideas about what ought to be included, 
or excluded, and I invite the leadership in Congress to make sure we 
are involved. That would have been appropriate because we have dealt 
with the leadership of the administration's agencies that have been 
deeply involved in helping us craft the Hope for Homeowners Act. It 
was, therefore, shocking to have the President of the United States, 
despite the advice and counsel of some of the key economic advisers of 
the administration who have been constructive in working with us on a 
way to keep people in their own homes, announce he intended to veto 
something even before we have had a chance to put it together.
  The good news is that I believe my colleagues on the Banking 
Committee, who are working on this, from the minority and Republican 
side, are still interested in hearing some ideas and working on this. 
That is not to suggest they have agreed to anything. They have not. But 
we are working--and our staffs are--to develop that compromise bill. 
They haven't been cowed by the announcement by the administration that 
they will veto anything we might do to keep hundreds of thousands of 
people in their homes.
  I would be remiss if I didn't note that it was only about a month ago 
or a month and a half ago that the Federal

[[Page 7992]]

Government committed $29 billion, without ever a vote occurring here, 
to make the merger between Bear Stearns and JPMorgan occur. That $29 
billion the Federal Government put into that deal made it possible for 
it to actually be accomplished.
  I happen to think they probably did the right thing that Sunday night 
of March 16. But I find it somewhat shocking that the President of the 
United States had little or nothing to say about that commitment of 
Federal dollars, and yet the idea that we might do something to make it 
possible for middle-income, hard-working families to stay in that most 
important possession, their home, he objects to--a bill before it 
exists that might accomplish that goal, done in a bipartisan fashion, 
involving his administration, key regulators from his own Government. 
That he would announce a veto of it is alarming to me, knowing how 
damaging this mortgage crisis is in so many aspects of our lives: 
commercial lending, student loans--they are all being adversely 
affected because of the mortgage crisis. The fact the President said, I 
am going to veto this bill no matter what you do up there, is 
disappointing.
  My hope is in the coming days, as we move toward a markup in the 
Banking Committee on this issue, that we will get cooperation and 
support. I cannot guarantee what we are doing will work, but I know 
inaction is not an option and failure is not an option. Too many of our 
fellow citizens are hurting with rising energy prices, health care 
costs, the cost of higher education, not to mention all these other 
costs, commodity increases and the like, and they need to know their 
Government is making an effort to make it possible for them to stay in 
their homes. That is why I feel so strongly about it.
  Although we are dealing with flood insurance today, I did not want to 
have people believe we are unmindful of what needs to be done in the 
area of home foreclosure. Mr. President, 7,000 to 8,000 foreclosures 
are filed every day, by 7,000 to 8,000 of our fellow citizens, and if 
you add our next door neighbors who are adversely affected, that is 
more than 20,000 people a day who have their life savings, their best 
investment put in jeopardy.
  For those reasons, I am hopeful we can get more cooperation on that 
issue.

                          ____________________